WEBVTT - Julia Louis-Dreyfus: Women in the White House

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:08.920
<v Speaker 1>I am a woman. Hear me roar in numbers too

0:00:08.920 --> 0:00:11.600
<v Speaker 1>big to ignore, and I know too much to go

0:00:11.680 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>back and pretend because I've heard it all before and

0:00:14.840 --> 0:00:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I've been down there on the floor. No one's ever

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:22.080
<v Speaker 1>going to keep me down again. I am strong, I

0:00:22.120 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 1>am invincible, I am woman. That song from Helen Ready

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:38.960
<v Speaker 1>came out in ninety one. I was fourteen years old,

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and Brian, that was the beginning of my ursioning feminism.

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:48.240
<v Speaker 1>That's exciting. I was negative ten when it came out. Wait, really,

0:00:48.440 --> 0:00:52.000
<v Speaker 1>it was a really meaningful moment. This was ten years

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:54.800
<v Speaker 1>before you were born. It was I'm sorry to report

0:00:54.880 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to reach across this desk and slap you. Yeah,

0:00:57.440 --> 0:01:00.720
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't be the first time anyway. But yeah, that's

0:01:00.720 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>equal rights, isn't it. But you know, I think that

0:01:03.960 --> 0:01:07.119
<v Speaker 1>that song was so important to me in my formative years.

0:01:07.200 --> 0:01:10.240
<v Speaker 1>That and the Mary Tyler Moore Show, because let's face it, Brian,

0:01:10.440 --> 0:01:12.920
<v Speaker 1>she could take a nothing day and suddenly make it

0:01:12.959 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>all seem worthwhile. Why are we talking about all of this? Well,

0:01:17.520 --> 0:01:21.440
<v Speaker 1>at the convention in Philadelphia, we saw the first female

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:25.880
<v Speaker 1>nominee for President of the United States in history, and

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:29.080
<v Speaker 1>no matter what your politics are. That's a pretty big deal.

0:01:29.520 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 1>So we wanted to get a take on what this means,

0:01:33.319 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>how people feel about it. We went out to Times

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Square to talk to women and men, boys and girls

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:44.520
<v Speaker 1>about the prospect of the first female president, female president.

0:01:44.640 --> 0:01:46.679
<v Speaker 1>Do you want to talk to me? So? And here's

0:01:46.680 --> 0:01:48.080
<v Speaker 1>some of the things they had to say. Where are

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:51.840
<v Speaker 1>you from New York? Oh? You were, Well, how do

0:01:51.880 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 1>you feel about potentially having a female president? It's everything,

0:01:57.560 --> 0:02:00.960
<v Speaker 1>it's everything that we need. Doesn't mean anything to you,

0:02:01.080 --> 0:02:07.040
<v Speaker 1>but I mean it's kind of surprising. Why because like

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 1>if it's like the first girl, I mean, it's always

0:02:11.320 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 1>a new thing. So how old are you? Okay, So,

0:02:18.440 --> 0:02:20.919
<v Speaker 1>how do you think you'll feel if, in fact Hillary

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:26.600
<v Speaker 1>Clinton's elected and you watch her being inaugurated? Proud? Kind

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:28.840
<v Speaker 1>of like we could all do it too. They give

0:02:28.880 --> 0:02:32.680
<v Speaker 1>you one day I could be president. Um. I think

0:02:32.680 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 1>it's more significant of the person and the character rather

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:39.840
<v Speaker 1>than the person's gender. Um. When I'm looking at voting

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:44.959
<v Speaker 1>for somebody, I'm not looking at sex, race, religion, anything,

0:02:45.360 --> 0:02:47.000
<v Speaker 1>looking at what they stand for and what they're doing.

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:51.120
<v Speaker 1>And so, how do you feel about you? Can you

0:02:51.120 --> 0:02:53.959
<v Speaker 1>tell me who you're voting for UM, I'm winning much

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:57.080
<v Speaker 1>more towards Trump than than through for Hillary. How do

0:02:57.120 --> 0:02:58.920
<v Speaker 1>you feel about it, I don't think. I don't really

0:02:59.000 --> 0:03:02.200
<v Speaker 1>it's a matter. I think it's a your opportunity. Personally,

0:03:02.240 --> 0:03:04.760
<v Speaker 1>I feel like how the female president will probably change

0:03:04.800 --> 0:03:08.400
<v Speaker 1>the standards of you know, I don't know. I feel

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:10.440
<v Speaker 1>like it's kind of an equal in the world of

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:13.600
<v Speaker 1>men and women. We get paid less, men get paid more.

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:16.520
<v Speaker 1>So if Hillary does become president, maybe those rules were

0:03:16.600 --> 0:03:19.359
<v Speaker 1>changed when everyone is kind of equal. It's not. As

0:03:19.400 --> 0:03:22.440
<v Speaker 1>she's a good president, then it would be great. So

0:03:22.520 --> 0:03:27.760
<v Speaker 1>her ability matters more to you than her gender. Half

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:38.680
<v Speaker 1>in half, we're excited to have the fictional feminist heroin

0:03:39.520 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 1>Julia Louis dryfe is akj or anti heroin Selina Meyer,

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:47.520
<v Speaker 1>who is currently running the country, at least on HBO.

0:03:48.200 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Like so many Americans, I have a massive girl crush

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>on Julia Louis dreyfuss. I first met her as Elaine

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:59.640
<v Speaker 1>on Seinfeld and I did a story on the final

0:03:59.680 --> 0:04:02.600
<v Speaker 1>episode of Seinfeld, so I went to the set. We

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 1>had so much fun, and in fact, she taught me

0:04:05.360 --> 0:04:07.840
<v Speaker 1>some of her moves on the dance floor, which is

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 1>my favorite Seinfeld episode explained so much about you on

0:04:11.440 --> 0:04:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the dance floor. Hey wait a second, I'm a really

0:04:13.360 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 1>good dancer. I have to work hard to look like

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:18.800
<v Speaker 1>a bad dancer. Actually, Brian, come on, but we I

0:04:18.880 --> 0:04:20.840
<v Speaker 1>just I don't know. We just hit it off. And

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:24.440
<v Speaker 1>of course I'm so thrilled for her success on V

0:04:24.600 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 1>because I think the show is brilliant and she is

0:04:27.120 --> 0:04:29.920
<v Speaker 1>brilliant in it, and she was nice enough to let

0:04:30.000 --> 0:04:33.839
<v Speaker 1>us give her a call at her house in l A. Hi, Julia,

0:04:33.920 --> 0:04:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Louis Dreyfus, Hi, Katie Kurt. It's very exciting to have

0:04:36.960 --> 0:04:40.080
<v Speaker 1>you joined our podcast. And by the way, it's because

0:04:40.080 --> 0:04:42.559
<v Speaker 1>we're in my house. It's possible things are gonna happen

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 1>while we're talking. That's okay. Like my teenager is still

0:04:46.040 --> 0:04:49.400
<v Speaker 1>sleep upstairs, and so he may come down and ask

0:04:49.440 --> 0:04:53.880
<v Speaker 1>for breakfast. Okay, this is a good time to teach

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:57.400
<v Speaker 1>him how to boil an egg exactly. This is Brian Goldsmith,

0:04:57.440 --> 0:04:59.520
<v Speaker 1>who's a huge fan of yours I am and a

0:04:59.600 --> 0:05:02.600
<v Speaker 1>huge fan of the show. Thank you, thank you, thank you.

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:05.760
<v Speaker 1>So welcome to our little podcast. Well, thanks for having

0:05:05.760 --> 0:05:09.960
<v Speaker 1>me on your little podcasts. You listen to podcasts, I do. Yeah,

0:05:10.160 --> 0:05:13.920
<v Speaker 1>I I think they're amazing actually, and I listened to

0:05:14.000 --> 0:05:16.840
<v Speaker 1>them when I have a long drive or on a plane.

0:05:17.040 --> 0:05:20.719
<v Speaker 1>What's your favorite podcast? Well, I'm a big Iro Glass

0:05:20.760 --> 0:05:23.880
<v Speaker 1>and uh, this American Life fan. That's sort of what

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:26.599
<v Speaker 1>I usually go to. And then the like the Moth

0:05:26.800 --> 0:05:30.000
<v Speaker 1>Series and stuff like that. Yeah, well there's so many.

0:05:30.080 --> 0:05:32.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. You know, there's so much material out

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:35.800
<v Speaker 1>there that's actually really worthy. I don't know how people

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:41.280
<v Speaker 1>ingest all the incoming good quality stuff, right, no kidding,

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:45.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean between podcasts and all the good television that's

0:05:45.600 --> 0:05:47.919
<v Speaker 1>out there on on cave boy, I don't know. I

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:49.760
<v Speaker 1>guess we should never get out of bed. I think

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:53.000
<v Speaker 1>you're right. That's how I feel sometime, honestly. But talking

0:05:53.000 --> 0:05:56.840
<v Speaker 1>about good television, we have to talk about Viev. I mean, listen,

0:05:57.080 --> 0:06:01.280
<v Speaker 1>it is so hilarious, Julia, and I know the creator left,

0:06:01.520 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 1>and you were very insistent that you wanted to keep

0:06:04.040 --> 0:06:07.719
<v Speaker 1>the show going. I feel like it's better than ever. Thanks.

0:06:07.800 --> 0:06:10.159
<v Speaker 1>That's so nice of you to say, And apparently you're

0:06:10.360 --> 0:06:13.960
<v Speaker 1>extremely involved in every bit of it, the writing, and

0:06:14.040 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 1>when you shoot a scene, you say, why don't we

0:06:16.520 --> 0:06:18.160
<v Speaker 1>do it this way or that way? In other words,

0:06:18.160 --> 0:06:21.280
<v Speaker 1>you're a control freak in the best possible way. Yes,

0:06:21.360 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that's why you and I like each other.

0:06:23.680 --> 0:06:27.120
<v Speaker 1>I think you're right, But I mean, obviously I think

0:06:27.520 --> 0:06:31.039
<v Speaker 1>you're having still having a fantastic time. And the C word,

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 1>I think was one of my favorite episodes ever. Oh really,

0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh you know what my husband directed that? I know

0:06:37.200 --> 0:06:42.920
<v Speaker 1>he did, which made me like it even more. Isn't

0:06:42.920 --> 0:06:45.359
<v Speaker 1>that funny that that's the episode he directed? Well, I

0:06:45.400 --> 0:06:48.599
<v Speaker 1>think everybody was talking about it and people just loved

0:06:48.640 --> 0:06:51.080
<v Speaker 1>it so much. And when you look ahead, I mean,

0:06:51.120 --> 0:06:54.520
<v Speaker 1>have have you started shooting for next season? We have

0:06:54.680 --> 0:06:57.599
<v Speaker 1>started writing for next season, but not shooting yet. And

0:06:57.680 --> 0:06:59.599
<v Speaker 1>so where do you you know, how do you figure

0:06:59.600 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 1>out where going to take the show? Because I think

0:07:01.800 --> 0:07:04.039
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people worried when she became president it

0:07:04.080 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 1>was going to lose its edge because so much of

0:07:07.440 --> 0:07:10.200
<v Speaker 1>the comedy was based on her being a second banana,

0:07:10.480 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>and yet it got funnier and funnier. And and have

0:07:14.000 --> 0:07:17.880
<v Speaker 1>can you give us, without a spoiler alert, any indication

0:07:17.960 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 1>of how the show is going to move forward? Well? Yeah,

0:07:21.480 --> 0:07:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I can, in in broad terms, I mean I can

0:07:24.400 --> 0:07:28.160
<v Speaker 1>say that Selina Meyer is a political animal, I mean

0:07:28.360 --> 0:07:32.480
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally in her core and so that's not going anywhere.

0:07:33.120 --> 0:07:36.679
<v Speaker 1>And um, and she was present for a very short

0:07:36.680 --> 0:07:38.920
<v Speaker 1>period of time, and you can even make the argument

0:07:38.960 --> 0:07:43.480
<v Speaker 1>that she wasn't even quite elected, you know, and so um,

0:07:43.520 --> 0:07:49.200
<v Speaker 1>it's very important to her. A top priority for her

0:07:49.360 --> 0:07:53.760
<v Speaker 1>is to remain relevant. Relevancy is the name of the game.

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:57.920
<v Speaker 1>So um, you know, you haven't seen the last of her,

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:00.240
<v Speaker 1>let's just put it that way. And and I think

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, this woman is always trying to get

0:08:04.080 --> 0:08:09.160
<v Speaker 1>uphill and uh, and that will remain in place because

0:08:09.200 --> 0:08:11.520
<v Speaker 1>even when she was president, she was campaigning to try

0:08:11.520 --> 0:08:14.560
<v Speaker 1>to stay president, and in fact campaigning to get elected

0:08:14.560 --> 0:08:18.440
<v Speaker 1>president because she wasn't. She sort of fell into it

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:21.440
<v Speaker 1>the first go round. You know, it's remarkable to me

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 1>how many people I know in politics who say that

0:08:23.680 --> 0:08:27.840
<v Speaker 1>VEEP is actually the most accurate depiction of what real

0:08:28.000 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 1>life in elected office is actually like, not House of Cards,

0:08:31.880 --> 0:08:35.679
<v Speaker 1>not the West Wing. But Veep does that thrill you

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:38.520
<v Speaker 1>or scare you or some combination of the two. I

0:08:38.559 --> 0:08:40.720
<v Speaker 1>guess it's a sort of a cocktail of the two,

0:08:41.120 --> 0:08:43.480
<v Speaker 1>but more thrilled me than anything else, because I feel

0:08:43.480 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 1>as if we've worked very hard. I mean, we've worked

0:08:46.880 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 1>really hard to keep to make a show funny first

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:52.480
<v Speaker 1>and foremost, but we've also worked really hard to keep

0:08:52.640 --> 0:08:57.200
<v Speaker 1>it plausible. So so much of the behavior and storylines

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:01.760
<v Speaker 1>goes through sort of a sieve in which we say, Okay,

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:06.080
<v Speaker 1>is this plausible? Would this happen? Can this happen? Is

0:09:06.160 --> 0:09:11.640
<v Speaker 1>this too broad? Is it just the right of small? Um?

0:09:11.720 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 1>You know? And so I I'm I'm thrilled at that,

0:09:14.880 --> 0:09:16.839
<v Speaker 1>and I do believe you know, I know it may

0:09:16.880 --> 0:09:19.320
<v Speaker 1>seem as if I'm very cynical about politics and so on,

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:23.959
<v Speaker 1>it actually has, in a weird way, kind of um

0:09:24.120 --> 0:09:26.960
<v Speaker 1>made me have even more respect for those people in

0:09:27.080 --> 0:09:30.400
<v Speaker 1>politics who I think have remained true to their core

0:09:30.640 --> 0:09:34.439
<v Speaker 1>and who haven't sort of an an elevated sense of

0:09:34.800 --> 0:09:38.120
<v Speaker 1>of and correctly so, of of doing the right thing

0:09:38.240 --> 0:09:43.040
<v Speaker 1>and and and sort of following an idea as opposed

0:09:43.080 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 1>to just um, a single person or an ego and

0:09:46.360 --> 0:09:49.960
<v Speaker 1>and and those people exist and so um, and I've

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:52.880
<v Speaker 1>had the good fortune to run into them. And of

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:55.040
<v Speaker 1>course there are plenty of people in politics who don't

0:09:56.080 --> 0:09:58.360
<v Speaker 1>fall into that category, but I think there are plenty

0:09:58.400 --> 0:10:02.360
<v Speaker 1>who do. So I'm not. I'm not undone by the

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:05.880
<v Speaker 1>the reality of the show. You have real political or

0:10:05.880 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 1>form of political prose who contribute to the show. You

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:12.760
<v Speaker 1>have also great journalists like Frank Rich who you know,

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:15.679
<v Speaker 1>had a great proximity to power and wrote about it

0:10:15.760 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 1>through the years. Um. I can't help but wonder how

0:10:20.000 --> 0:10:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the juxtaposition of the Trump campaign and the craziest campaign season.

0:10:24.720 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 1>I think that you and I and most people can

0:10:27.640 --> 0:10:31.440
<v Speaker 1>remember how that is kind of playing out in terms

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:34.320
<v Speaker 1>of how VEEP is developing as well. Can you talk

0:10:34.360 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 1>about that a little bit, Julia, Yeah, Well, I'll tell

0:10:37.160 --> 0:10:41.960
<v Speaker 1>you something. What's going on in the Trump campaign. I

0:10:42.000 --> 0:10:45.120
<v Speaker 1>am telling you if you were to take the actual

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:50.679
<v Speaker 1>his language, his his the sentences that he speaks and

0:10:50.800 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 1>put them down on paper, or there's certain reality the

0:10:55.320 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 1>realities that occurred at the Republican Convention, I e. Uh,

0:11:00.920 --> 0:11:06.720
<v Speaker 1>Milania Trump plagiarizing the speech um, either wittingly or unwittingly whatever.

0:11:06.800 --> 0:11:10.720
<v Speaker 1>But it's a fact. Uh, it's too broad for our show.

0:11:11.040 --> 0:11:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Real life is crazier than it's too big. I'm telling you,

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:17.880
<v Speaker 1>if they had said that, I would have said, no, guys,

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:20.040
<v Speaker 1>we're not going to do this. Is this is ah,

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:23.360
<v Speaker 1>this is broad. This is like a cartoon when you

0:11:23.400 --> 0:11:26.920
<v Speaker 1>come up with stuff like that slogan continuity with change,

0:11:26.920 --> 0:11:29.440
<v Speaker 1>which is sort of a parody of a political consult

0:11:29.480 --> 0:11:32.160
<v Speaker 1>of a slogan, And it turns out the Prime Minister

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:37.400
<v Speaker 1>of Australia basically copied it. His was continuity and change. Yeah,

0:11:37.559 --> 0:11:41.320
<v Speaker 1>so he changed the uh what is that conjunction or whatever?

0:11:41.679 --> 0:11:43.720
<v Speaker 1>And then he got a lot of shipped for it,

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:45.960
<v Speaker 1>and then I guess he made it. He made he

0:11:46.040 --> 0:11:50.920
<v Speaker 1>changed it again. But isn't that remarkable? That's one of

0:11:50.920 --> 0:11:54.720
<v Speaker 1>my favorite UM moments, Julia. I mean, what do you

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:57.600
<v Speaker 1>think of this whole Trump campaign when you see it

0:11:57.840 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>just as an American citizen? And who on the show

0:12:01.080 --> 0:12:04.400
<v Speaker 1>is most like Donald Trump? You think, um on the show?

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:06.400
<v Speaker 1>I guess the person who's the most like Donald Trump

0:12:06.440 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 1>on our show is Jonah Ryan, only because played by

0:12:10.400 --> 0:12:16.480
<v Speaker 1>the wonderful Tim Simmons, only because he's completely um ill

0:12:16.600 --> 0:12:21.120
<v Speaker 1>suited for the job of congressman and um and unfit

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:26.520
<v Speaker 1>is the word of choice these days, and and potentially

0:12:26.600 --> 0:12:29.640
<v Speaker 1>mentally unstable all in one. So I would say that

0:12:29.720 --> 0:12:32.319
<v Speaker 1>Jonah Ryan is as close as we can get to Trump.

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:35.120
<v Speaker 1>But he certainly wasn't fashioned after Trump? Are you being

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:37.400
<v Speaker 1>inspired by some of the things you're watching on the

0:12:37.440 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 1>campaign trail? And I don't mean inspired as a person,

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:42.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean inspired as a writer and someone in the

0:12:42.720 --> 0:12:46.000
<v Speaker 1>field of comedy. Well, I mean yes and no. I

0:12:46.040 --> 0:12:49.560
<v Speaker 1>mean the show obviously isn't a parody. And we've created

0:12:49.559 --> 0:12:53.840
<v Speaker 1>this alternate universe on our show so that parties aren't

0:12:53.960 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 1>aren't defined. Uh. And that's really been an advantage, particularly nowadays,

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:04.120
<v Speaker 1>when everything is so seemingly polarized. Um, I think it

0:13:04.960 --> 0:13:07.560
<v Speaker 1>gives us the opportunity to have sort of everybody can

0:13:07.640 --> 0:13:10.400
<v Speaker 1>join in on the fun. I mean. The truth is

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:16.080
<v Speaker 1>is that when we meet with insiders uh and politicians

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:18.880
<v Speaker 1>and so on in d C, no matter what side

0:13:18.920 --> 0:13:21.800
<v Speaker 1>of the aisle they're on, they think we're making fun

0:13:21.840 --> 0:13:25.840
<v Speaker 1>of the other side. That's convenient. Yeah, it's very convenient.

0:13:26.080 --> 0:13:31.319
<v Speaker 1>So um, I mean, yeah, sure, we're all uh keenly

0:13:31.600 --> 0:13:36.440
<v Speaker 1>involved and watching, of course as all I would think

0:13:36.480 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 1>I would hope most American citizens are, but also as

0:13:40.720 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 1>comedy writers and as and given the fact that the

0:13:43.240 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 1>show is political, but our goal is not to sort

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:50.520
<v Speaker 1>of scoop that stuff up and and and we never

0:13:50.600 --> 0:13:53.600
<v Speaker 1>have sort of put it directly into a show. Um,

0:13:53.640 --> 0:13:57.440
<v Speaker 1>although it seems to things seem to sort of parallel

0:13:57.520 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 1>a lot in a weird way, almost by coincidence, as

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:06.840
<v Speaker 1>in the continuity uh, continuity with change slogan. Let's talk

0:14:06.880 --> 0:14:10.160
<v Speaker 1>about your sort of political leans. I know you had

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 1>your supporting Hillary Clinton. Um, and I'm curious about how

0:14:15.240 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 1>you feel she's being portrayed out there in the world,

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:24.160
<v Speaker 1>and if you feel that she's being portrayed fairly, because

0:14:24.680 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 1>there is you know, I'm sure you've talked a lot

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:31.960
<v Speaker 1>about sexes and both professionally, politically, etcetera. And do you

0:14:32.000 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>think that's entering into the conversation even in a subtle way.

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:39.840
<v Speaker 1>I think it's in the conversation. And we don't even

0:14:39.880 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 1>know it. For instance, we're talking about it right now,

0:14:43.400 --> 0:14:48.080
<v Speaker 1>right and um, we wouldn't be talking about it if

0:14:48.120 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't an issue. Um, there is, there's no avoiding it.

0:14:53.080 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's it's it's an extraordinary achievement that she's

0:14:56.600 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 1>a first female candidate for for president dominated Canada, I

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>should say. And and at the same time, she is

0:15:04.320 --> 0:15:09.360
<v Speaker 1>being seen through a lens as such. Um. And you

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:14.000
<v Speaker 1>know people talk about those pants suits and people talk about, uh, well, look,

0:15:14.080 --> 0:15:16.640
<v Speaker 1>let's put it this way, a man who is I've

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:20.560
<v Speaker 1>said this before, but a man who is decisive and stern,

0:15:21.920 --> 0:15:26.520
<v Speaker 1>uh is. I would say Garners a certain amount of respect,

0:15:27.680 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 1>but I can't say that's the same necessarily for a woman.

0:15:31.200 --> 0:15:32.760
<v Speaker 1>And I really think that's all you need to know.

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:37.320
<v Speaker 1>And you play the first female president on your show,

0:15:38.640 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 1>how do you think about portraying that character You're trying

0:15:42.920 --> 0:15:45.760
<v Speaker 1>to send a message in any way about now, I'm

0:15:45.800 --> 0:15:50.280
<v Speaker 1>trying to be funny period, I'm not on a soapbox

0:15:50.320 --> 0:15:52.960
<v Speaker 1>on this show. Having said that, though we're making fun

0:15:53.000 --> 0:15:55.960
<v Speaker 1>of this reality, I mean, there has been more than

0:15:56.360 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 1>more than one occasion in which uh A Meyer has

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:04.840
<v Speaker 1>said things like I don't want to identify myself as

0:16:04.840 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 1>a woman because people don't like women, and as a woman,

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:13.520
<v Speaker 1>you know that, and I know that we don't like women.

0:16:13.960 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 1>So I mean, I'm completely botching what the line was,

0:16:17.200 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 1>but we've said a variation on that line multiple times

0:16:21.720 --> 0:16:24.760
<v Speaker 1>throughout the seasons, and the word lady balls has used

0:16:24.760 --> 0:16:27.280
<v Speaker 1>many times on the show. Yeah, lady balls for sure.

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I was asking Brian about, gee, does the show really

0:16:31.960 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of take on sexism? Uh, in a in a

0:16:36.400 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 1>in a in a significant way, and we were scratching

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:43.280
<v Speaker 1>our heads and saying, not so much. It seems to

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:47.320
<v Speaker 1>be somewhat gender neutral in terms of the comedy that's

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 1>part and parcel of the show. Would you agree with

0:16:49.400 --> 0:16:51.880
<v Speaker 1>that except for those some exceptions, I think we do

0:16:52.040 --> 0:16:53.880
<v Speaker 1>take it on. But I think we take it on.

0:16:54.240 --> 0:17:01.400
<v Speaker 1>It's it's um, it's between the lines, um, And I

0:17:01.440 --> 0:17:04.879
<v Speaker 1>think the very concept of the show takes it on.

0:17:06.240 --> 0:17:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Now we should say there are a lot of female

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 1>conservatives who are not supporting Hillary, having nothing to do

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:16.119
<v Speaker 1>with sexism, but because they fundamentally disagree with her. Oh listen,

0:17:16.160 --> 0:17:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm not even suggesting that people aren't supporting her only

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:21.480
<v Speaker 1>because she's a woman. For those who aren't supporting her,

0:17:21.520 --> 0:17:27.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm not suggesting that. I'm just saying that people, Um,

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:31.120
<v Speaker 1>it's a different kind of judgment period, That's what I think. Right.

0:17:31.240 --> 0:17:33.840
<v Speaker 1>In fact, she said as much talked about sort of

0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Hillary standards, right, and think she's been very open about that.

0:17:38.040 --> 0:17:41.280
<v Speaker 1>And and do you feel like that exists obviously for

0:17:41.320 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 1>women in Hollywood still, there's been so much discussion in

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:48.560
<v Speaker 1>recent years about the dearth of great roles. You did

0:17:48.560 --> 0:17:52.400
<v Speaker 1>a very funny skit with Tina Fey and Patricia Arquette

0:17:52.760 --> 0:17:56.879
<v Speaker 1>and Amy Schumer comes up as your last effable Day,

0:17:57.080 --> 0:18:00.159
<v Speaker 1>And and I think that was also about agents not

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:02.840
<v Speaker 1>allowed to swear on your podcast. Well, I don't know.

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:05.600
<v Speaker 1>You did say it the other day, and that got

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:08.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of attention on social media. It did, did it? Really?

0:18:09.400 --> 0:18:12.000
<v Speaker 1>So if I correct you and say it's called the

0:18:12.040 --> 0:18:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Last fuckuble Day, maybe it'll get more bucket. Anyway, what

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:22.480
<v Speaker 1>was the question? The question was about the video? Oh, yes, yeah,

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:25.440
<v Speaker 1>And I was just gonna say, um, is it still

0:18:25.640 --> 0:18:31.159
<v Speaker 1>very frustrating to be a woman in Hollywood? Sure? I know,

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:34.360
<v Speaker 1>is that's a stupid question. I know that's it sounds stupid.

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 1>But I feel like things are starting to change a

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:40.679
<v Speaker 1>little bit, or are they not. I don't know, It

0:18:40.760 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 1>really depends. I mean, no, no, I mean I guess

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:46.199
<v Speaker 1>they are, just because we're sort of talking about it.

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:52.000
<v Speaker 1>And and I think there's certainly been um more movement

0:18:52.080 --> 0:18:56.399
<v Speaker 1>in the world of television and cable, movement in the

0:18:56.480 --> 0:19:00.879
<v Speaker 1>right direction for more gender equality and also versification. I

0:19:00.920 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 1>would say, but um, certainly not in film. I don't think.

0:19:06.320 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think that's the case. In film, and it's

0:19:09.840 --> 0:19:14.480
<v Speaker 1>definitely harder to age in in show business as a

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:16.880
<v Speaker 1>woman than it is for a man. But I would

0:19:16.880 --> 0:19:21.200
<v Speaker 1>say that there's a there's plenty, plenty room for improvement. Yeah,

0:19:21.240 --> 0:19:23.240
<v Speaker 1>how can we change that? You know, as somebody who's

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 1>about to turn sixty? Uh, that would be me, not you.

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:30.439
<v Speaker 1>I think about it. Will it ever change? Because it

0:19:30.600 --> 0:19:35.960
<v Speaker 1>seems to me the preferred age of actors or newscasters

0:19:36.040 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>even or is in their thirties and forties, right, So

0:19:40.040 --> 0:19:44.919
<v Speaker 1>how do you change that? By continuing to work and

0:19:45.000 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 1>setting an example, you know, and uh and having some

0:19:48.920 --> 0:19:53.240
<v Speaker 1>ladyballs because um, as much as as as you can

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 1>or feels appropriate. I mean, I executive produce my show

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and I uh call a lot of the shots and um,

0:20:03.359 --> 0:20:06.760
<v Speaker 1>but that hasn't always been the case, and I'm glad

0:20:06.800 --> 0:20:10.440
<v Speaker 1>it is now. And I try to hire as many

0:20:11.119 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 1>capable women as as we can and and uh, but

0:20:17.040 --> 0:20:20.760
<v Speaker 1>it's not easy there. I mean, it took a long

0:20:20.840 --> 0:20:23.919
<v Speaker 1>time for me to get into this position, and uh,

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:26.479
<v Speaker 1>I've had to work hard to get to this moment.

0:20:26.600 --> 0:20:28.240
<v Speaker 1>But maybe I'm happy to be here. I was going

0:20:28.320 --> 0:20:30.520
<v Speaker 1>to say maybe because of you, though it will be

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:34.879
<v Speaker 1>easier for the women who are coming after you. And yeah,

0:20:34.920 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 1>I feel that for me too. Yeah, you know that

0:20:38.160 --> 0:20:40.960
<v Speaker 1>I had to put up with so much BS when

0:20:41.000 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 1>I anchored the CBS Evening News that I feel like

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:47.359
<v Speaker 1>the women behind me don't have to deal with quite

0:20:47.359 --> 0:20:50.199
<v Speaker 1>as much. I mean, there's still a certain amount of

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:52.080
<v Speaker 1>it that they're going to have to tolerate, but it

0:20:52.200 --> 0:20:54.880
<v Speaker 1>just sort of gets easier. The less novel it is,

0:20:54.960 --> 0:20:58.000
<v Speaker 1>the easier it becomes. Yeah, I think that's exactly right,

0:20:58.040 --> 0:21:02.600
<v Speaker 1>the less novel. And uh, you know, assuming that Hillary

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:05.560
<v Speaker 1>gets elected. You know, think if you're a little kid

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:09.119
<v Speaker 1>right now, think if you're ten or twelve years old

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:12.920
<v Speaker 1>and the first president in your memories that is an

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:17.760
<v Speaker 1>African American man, and the next president is is a

0:21:17.760 --> 0:21:21.760
<v Speaker 1>a female. I mean, I think how that changes your

0:21:21.800 --> 0:21:26.080
<v Speaker 1>point of view on life generally. Um, I think it's enormous.

0:21:26.240 --> 0:21:28.920
<v Speaker 1>We should talk about for a second your own relationship

0:21:28.960 --> 0:21:32.679
<v Speaker 1>with Hillary Clinton, because she sent you a note in

0:21:32.880 --> 0:21:39.440
<v Speaker 1>early Can you tell that story? I can. Well. Um,

0:21:39.480 --> 0:21:43.920
<v Speaker 1>it turns out that when we we shot Veep in Baltimore,

0:21:43.960 --> 0:21:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Maryland for the first four years, and um, someone who

0:21:50.160 --> 0:21:54.000
<v Speaker 1>was in our makeup department also did the makeup for

0:21:54.080 --> 0:21:56.879
<v Speaker 1>Hillary Clinton. And this was back when she was Secretary

0:21:56.960 --> 0:22:03.920
<v Speaker 1>State and so uh for Christmas. Uh, the hair make

0:22:04.280 --> 0:22:07.879
<v Speaker 1>folks who are all good friends of mine gave to

0:22:07.960 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 1>me a buck slip that's a secretary stayed on it

0:22:12.119 --> 0:22:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and it's from Hillary Clinton and hold on him in

0:22:15.560 --> 0:22:21.840
<v Speaker 1>my office. I'm gonna get it. And it says, uh, Julia,

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:24.880
<v Speaker 1>you're a great VEEP. Hope you can get gun control,

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:28.440
<v Speaker 1>immigration reform, and job creation this season. All the best

0:22:29.000 --> 0:22:34.359
<v Speaker 1>Hillary Rodham Clinton. And this was in January of two thirteen,

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:37.280
<v Speaker 1>so you can imagine how thrilled I was to get

0:22:37.320 --> 0:22:40.400
<v Speaker 1>this was such just amazing and you thought, wow, this

0:22:40.400 --> 0:22:45.119
<v Speaker 1>show is really breaking through, Yes, exactly, And so I

0:22:45.240 --> 0:22:52.359
<v Speaker 1>had it framed and loved it. And then her emails

0:22:52.640 --> 0:22:56.000
<v Speaker 1>came out and uh, and a bunch of them, you know,

0:22:56.040 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 1>we're put out there for public record or whatever the

0:22:58.560 --> 0:23:02.640
<v Speaker 1>word is. And somebody tweeted to me, did you see this,

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:05.920
<v Speaker 1>which I had not because I really not interested in

0:23:06.000 --> 0:23:11.560
<v Speaker 1>really for emails and uh, and the email is from

0:23:11.640 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Hillary to somebody who worked for her, saying, a friend

0:23:14.560 --> 0:23:18.479
<v Speaker 1>wants me to sign something for Julia. Lewis drce Dryfe

0:23:18.520 --> 0:23:20.639
<v Speaker 1>is for VEEP any ideas Lewis by the way, it

0:23:20.720 --> 0:23:23.679
<v Speaker 1>is spelled l e w. I s that's not how

0:23:23.720 --> 0:23:25.560
<v Speaker 1>I spelled my last name. So she's a huge fan

0:23:26.280 --> 0:23:30.760
<v Speaker 1>and and her guy wrote back, let me brainstorm on

0:23:30.880 --> 0:23:34.119
<v Speaker 1>this one, do some research. I confess I haven't seen

0:23:34.200 --> 0:23:41.159
<v Speaker 1>the show, so it was just perfect. And so I

0:23:41.200 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 1>printed this up and then I reframed this so that

0:23:44.000 --> 0:23:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the buck slip and the email are next to each other,

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:51.239
<v Speaker 1>because it's it's just quintessentially, it's everything about this I

0:23:51.320 --> 0:23:53.680
<v Speaker 1>love to be honest with you, and it's and and

0:23:53.800 --> 0:23:57.840
<v Speaker 1>it's nothing against Hillary at all, but it does speak to, frankly,

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 1>what our show Veep is very much about. And uh

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:04.560
<v Speaker 1>so it's but I was thrilled to be I mean,

0:24:04.600 --> 0:24:06.840
<v Speaker 1>to have this connection and then to have this buck

0:24:06.880 --> 0:24:09.560
<v Speaker 1>slip from her. It's just crazy, isn't it? When it's

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:12.439
<v Speaker 1>so funny when you say what our show is really about?

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 1>What would you say your show is really about? It's

0:24:15.800 --> 0:24:19.760
<v Speaker 1>obviously about not not about nothing. It's about Is it

0:24:19.840 --> 0:24:24.919
<v Speaker 1>about sort of the difference between appearances and what people

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:28.280
<v Speaker 1>what's really going on behind the scenes. Yeah, I guess

0:24:28.280 --> 0:24:33.080
<v Speaker 1>it's about the real huge human behavior in politics as

0:24:33.080 --> 0:24:38.000
<v Speaker 1>opposed to the lofty idea of human behavior in politics.

0:24:38.280 --> 0:24:44.040
<v Speaker 1>And Uh, it's what's behind the curtain. That's what it's about. Well,

0:24:44.040 --> 0:24:47.520
<v Speaker 1>one small thing that the show accomplishes is it is

0:24:47.520 --> 0:24:51.200
<v Speaker 1>it exposes the culture of the body man in Washington,

0:24:51.400 --> 0:24:53.520
<v Speaker 1>which I think a lot of people not in politics

0:24:54.040 --> 0:24:57.639
<v Speaker 1>didn't know about. Um. The Gary character is kind of

0:24:57.680 --> 0:25:01.320
<v Speaker 1>the body man to the to the tenth our Um,

0:25:01.359 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 1>can you sort of describe for people who haven't seen

0:25:03.560 --> 0:25:07.159
<v Speaker 1>the show what that person does. Well, bodyman is a

0:25:07.160 --> 0:25:11.280
<v Speaker 1>real position. It's a guy or a woman who travels

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:13.920
<v Speaker 1>to the president and sort of attends to the president

0:25:14.119 --> 0:25:18.240
<v Speaker 1>every moment, so knows the president's schedule or vice president schedule,

0:25:18.560 --> 0:25:22.640
<v Speaker 1>knows where what they need when they want their snack,

0:25:22.760 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 1>what if they if what kind of snack they would want. Uh,

0:25:27.119 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 1>they have Kleenex, they have anything is in a bag

0:25:31.640 --> 0:25:38.199
<v Speaker 1>that they carry with them, throat lozenges, throat loenges, Purell, Taan, Pax,

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:42.119
<v Speaker 1>whatever you need, they've got it and it's in a bag.

0:25:42.160 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 1>And it's a very very uh I'm going to say

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:52.440
<v Speaker 1>intimate position. Uh. Doug Band was body man to Clinton

0:25:52.480 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 1>for many years and rose rose up to to run

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:59.160
<v Speaker 1>the Clinton foundation. At first glance, I guess you could

0:25:59.160 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 1>say seemingly me ne old job, but in fact it's

0:26:01.680 --> 0:26:04.439
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of just the opposite. And Tony Hale plays

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:09.240
<v Speaker 1>my body man on Veep and we have so much

0:26:09.280 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 1>fun together. You have no idea. He's a great, Katie.

0:26:11.600 --> 0:26:15.000
<v Speaker 1>If you manhim, I have. He is so funny. He's

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:17.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of he is that guy. He is the great

0:26:17.520 --> 0:26:20.520
<v Speaker 1>And it's funny because we're very close and in a

0:26:20.600 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 1>strange way, uh like, when we're working together, he's sort

0:26:25.280 --> 0:26:28.640
<v Speaker 1>of that same guy to me in a weird way.

0:26:28.640 --> 0:26:30.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, not that he follows me around with the bags,

0:26:30.880 --> 0:26:35.679
<v Speaker 1>but there was exactly the levivan, but there's sort of

0:26:35.680 --> 0:26:38.960
<v Speaker 1>an intimacy there that is comfortable in the house to

0:26:39.000 --> 0:26:41.719
<v Speaker 1>say it. Well, you have such an incredible group of

0:26:41.760 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 1>people on that show, I mean every last one of them.

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:48.280
<v Speaker 1>It is such a true ensemble. And the people behind

0:26:48.320 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 1>the scenes, as Katie mentioned earlier, are political pros who

0:26:51.640 --> 0:26:54.359
<v Speaker 1>who have been in these positions. Do they kind of

0:26:54.440 --> 0:26:57.280
<v Speaker 1>go through this script writing process with you and say, well,

0:26:57.560 --> 0:27:01.280
<v Speaker 1>this could happen, this doesn't happen my past. Yes, we

0:27:01.320 --> 0:27:04.080
<v Speaker 1>have these We have these political consultants who work on

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the show from both sides of the aisle, by the way,

0:27:07.320 --> 0:27:13.680
<v Speaker 1>and uh vet our scripts so um, which is fantastic,

0:27:13.840 --> 0:27:16.959
<v Speaker 1>And they go through and say exactly that this isn't plausible.

0:27:17.080 --> 0:27:20.560
<v Speaker 1>You would need more secret service in this scene. Uh,

0:27:20.600 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 1>there's no way this person would be allowed to enter

0:27:22.880 --> 0:27:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the oval all that kind of stuff. And they've been there,

0:27:25.560 --> 0:27:28.639
<v Speaker 1>They've lived and breathed it, so they know and a

0:27:28.720 --> 0:27:30.760
<v Speaker 1>lot and most of the time, I would say, we

0:27:30.760 --> 0:27:33.960
<v Speaker 1>we follow their advice. Sometimes we don't for the sake

0:27:34.000 --> 0:27:37.480
<v Speaker 1>of comedy or telling of a story, but for the

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:39.600
<v Speaker 1>most part, we really do because it's important to us

0:27:39.640 --> 0:27:42.480
<v Speaker 1>to make the things seem grounded, you know. I mean,

0:27:42.680 --> 0:27:45.720
<v Speaker 1>but but with this election season, it seems like the

0:27:45.760 --> 0:27:48.320
<v Speaker 1>sky is literally the limit. I mean, you have Scott

0:27:48.400 --> 0:27:51.600
<v Speaker 1>bo standing in front of a sign that says count

0:27:52.200 --> 0:27:55.320
<v Speaker 1>at the Republican National Convention, and he's standing in front

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:58.119
<v Speaker 1>of the Oh. I mean, that would have been a

0:27:58.320 --> 0:28:02.480
<v Speaker 1>perfect end van for favorite episode. Yes, it would have

0:28:02.520 --> 0:28:05.560
<v Speaker 1>been an ideal ending, and we may have to revisit

0:28:05.640 --> 0:28:08.240
<v Speaker 1>that moment. And then you have Donald Trump being handed

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:11.000
<v Speaker 1>a purple heart and saying, I've always wanted one of these.

0:28:11.040 --> 0:28:13.320
<v Speaker 1>And this is a lot easier. I mean, can't you

0:28:13.359 --> 0:28:17.239
<v Speaker 1>see a character in veep doing something like that? To me,

0:28:17.320 --> 0:28:21.200
<v Speaker 1>that sounds like Selena Meyer, Yeah, exactly, who, by the way,

0:28:21.280 --> 0:28:24.560
<v Speaker 1>is also unfit to be president. Um, but that would

0:28:24.600 --> 0:28:28.200
<v Speaker 1>be something she might say. It's incredibly narcissistic and insensitive

0:28:28.240 --> 0:28:33.640
<v Speaker 1>and and and there's there's zero understanding of the circumstances

0:28:33.760 --> 0:28:37.200
<v Speaker 1>or the realities of a purple heart, but a lot

0:28:37.240 --> 0:28:39.400
<v Speaker 1>like Selena Meyer. When Hillary Clinton tried to get on

0:28:39.440 --> 0:28:42.920
<v Speaker 1>the subway in New York, and that was a brilliant moment. Yeah,

0:28:43.120 --> 0:28:45.640
<v Speaker 1>and I'm just that MetroCard to work. Oh, it's just

0:28:45.720 --> 0:28:47.920
<v Speaker 1>too favy exactly because for those of us who actually

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:50.479
<v Speaker 1>do take the subway, there's a there's a particular rhythm

0:28:50.560 --> 0:28:53.400
<v Speaker 1>with which you have to swipe, and for those people

0:28:53.400 --> 0:28:55.480
<v Speaker 1>who don't take the subway, it's it's kind of hard

0:28:55.520 --> 0:28:57.560
<v Speaker 1>to master on your first go. And it was kind

0:28:57.560 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 1>of a modern moment, a modern replay of George Herpert

0:29:01.360 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Walker Bush at the grocery store scanner right where he

0:29:06.440 --> 0:29:09.000
<v Speaker 1>couldn't figure out sort of how much melt cost Wright

0:29:09.000 --> 0:29:12.480
<v Speaker 1>being marveled at the at the scanner and its ability

0:29:12.520 --> 0:29:17.080
<v Speaker 1>to detect immediately what sort of food was coming across

0:29:17.200 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 1>the table, right, Well, I mean, these guys live in

0:29:19.800 --> 0:29:22.600
<v Speaker 1>a bubble. Let's not let's not kid ourselves. Do you

0:29:22.600 --> 0:29:24.840
<v Speaker 1>think we expect too much of our leaders. We want

0:29:24.840 --> 0:29:27.160
<v Speaker 1>them to be in touch and down to earth, and

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:30.240
<v Speaker 1>we also want them to make these big decisions about

0:29:30.240 --> 0:29:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Warren Peace. Um, yeah, I'm not sure down to earth matters.

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:43.720
<v Speaker 1>I think intelligence and wisdom is really the name of

0:29:43.720 --> 0:29:46.080
<v Speaker 1>the game. Um, but I don't know how that cells.

0:29:46.200 --> 0:29:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I was going to say, and this in this day

0:29:48.160 --> 0:29:51.520
<v Speaker 1>and age, and you watch what happened with Brexit, it

0:29:51.640 --> 0:29:57.080
<v Speaker 1>seems like anti intellectualism is so profoundly popular now. The

0:29:57.080 --> 0:30:01.880
<v Speaker 1>guy who said don't listen to experts, expert don't know anything. Um,

0:30:01.920 --> 0:30:06.880
<v Speaker 1>it's been very It's been fascinating and also unsettling to

0:30:06.960 --> 0:30:12.720
<v Speaker 1>watch people dismiss anybody with any level of expertise or experience.

0:30:12.720 --> 0:30:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Why do you think that's happening? I don't know. But

0:30:15.880 --> 0:30:18.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not a good sign. I mean, it's happened in

0:30:18.160 --> 0:30:21.880
<v Speaker 1>other times in world history, and it's it's never a

0:30:21.920 --> 0:30:31.120
<v Speaker 1>good thing. So UM, striving for UM, I don't know.

0:30:31.200 --> 0:30:33.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what to say. I'm kind of despondent

0:30:33.360 --> 0:30:37.360
<v Speaker 1>about it. Actually, I think, let me just put it

0:30:37.400 --> 0:30:39.320
<v Speaker 1>this way. Let's get out the vote. We got to

0:30:39.320 --> 0:30:41.240
<v Speaker 1>get out the vote. This is what this election is

0:30:41.240 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 1>all about. If we can get out the vote, I

0:30:43.320 --> 0:30:46.880
<v Speaker 1>think I think Hillary will win and I'm going to

0:30:47.480 --> 0:30:51.760
<v Speaker 1>um work really really hard to help get that in place. Well,

0:30:51.760 --> 0:30:55.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe if she wins, she'll be a guest on the

0:30:55.320 --> 0:30:59.840
<v Speaker 1>next the next veep. What do you think of that? Now,

0:31:00.040 --> 0:31:02.680
<v Speaker 1>that won't work. I love her to death, but she's

0:31:02.720 --> 0:31:04.760
<v Speaker 1>not getting into VIEP and neither as Donald or any

0:31:04.760 --> 0:31:06.400
<v Speaker 1>of these other people. We don't put any real life

0:31:06.440 --> 0:31:10.160
<v Speaker 1>people in our shows. U. We we created this alternate

0:31:10.240 --> 0:31:16.560
<v Speaker 1>universe very very specifically, uh and intentionally so that um

0:31:17.280 --> 0:31:18.840
<v Speaker 1>so we don't have any of that. We don't even

0:31:18.880 --> 0:31:23.440
<v Speaker 1>have real journalists or or anything on our show. We've create.

0:31:23.520 --> 0:31:28.000
<v Speaker 1>We've just completely made another world altogether, which I'm actually

0:31:28.040 --> 0:31:32.960
<v Speaker 1>quite glad about. Otherwise we'd we'd fall into fall into

0:31:32.960 --> 0:31:36.120
<v Speaker 1>areas we wouldn't want to go to. I think communically, well,

0:31:36.160 --> 0:31:43.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe Larry David could be a Bernie Sanders like character. No, Katie, no, okay,

0:31:43.160 --> 0:31:46.400
<v Speaker 1>if he's already done that, that's true. Brilliantly, I might

0:31:46.440 --> 0:31:50.400
<v Speaker 1>add brilliantly. Obviously, I could never work for for a

0:31:50.480 --> 0:31:53.360
<v Speaker 1>show like yours. I just don't have any new ideas. No,

0:31:53.600 --> 0:31:56.520
<v Speaker 1>you're coming, You're you're pitching terrible ideas. But I'm my

0:31:56.640 --> 0:31:58.680
<v Speaker 1>door is open if you want to pitch me other ones,

0:31:58.720 --> 0:32:01.280
<v Speaker 1>I'll listen. I don't think I'm going to give you

0:32:01.280 --> 0:32:05.040
<v Speaker 1>the job. I'm glad at least you're honest. Well, thank

0:32:05.080 --> 0:32:07.560
<v Speaker 1>you for talking with us. This was really It's always

0:32:07.600 --> 0:32:09.720
<v Speaker 1>great to talk to you. And hopefully I'll see you soon.

0:32:09.920 --> 0:32:12.440
<v Speaker 1>Oh I hope so and um, thanks for having me

0:32:12.480 --> 0:32:14.520
<v Speaker 1>on your show. Good luck with it. I'm psyched that

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:17.479
<v Speaker 1>you've got it. Thanks. Nice to meet you, too, Nice

0:32:17.520 --> 0:32:22.320
<v Speaker 1>to meet you. Brilliant Oh my god, we created a monster,

0:32:23.040 --> 0:32:28.160
<v Speaker 1>fucking monster if by you guys, talk to you. Okay,

0:32:28.200 --> 0:32:32.800
<v Speaker 1>but Brian, that was so fun. I don't know about you,

0:32:32.840 --> 0:32:34.880
<v Speaker 1>but I just love her. You must have a crush

0:32:34.920 --> 0:32:36.800
<v Speaker 1>on her now too, right, I've always had a crush

0:32:36.880 --> 0:32:38.760
<v Speaker 1>until you, Louis Drive when I was getting ready to

0:32:38.800 --> 0:32:41.080
<v Speaker 1>do this interview. By the way, I think I read

0:32:41.160 --> 0:32:43.560
<v Speaker 1>that all the twenty five and twenty six year old

0:32:43.600 --> 0:32:47.120
<v Speaker 1>writers who are working on Seinfeld we're in love with her.

0:32:47.200 --> 0:32:50.000
<v Speaker 1>So you can understand why, of course, but it's also

0:32:50.080 --> 0:32:53.840
<v Speaker 1>great because I think that sometimes things happen on television

0:32:54.400 --> 0:32:57.240
<v Speaker 1>and they get us ready for things happening in real life.

0:32:57.240 --> 0:33:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Whether we're talking about The Huxtables, pre Bill Cosby, Controversy

0:33:01.680 --> 0:33:05.560
<v Speaker 1>PS or other shows. You know, I think you've got

0:33:05.560 --> 0:33:07.280
<v Speaker 1>to see it to be it, and so when you

0:33:07.320 --> 0:33:10.760
<v Speaker 1>see it on television, it normalizes it. We're going to

0:33:10.880 --> 0:33:13.960
<v Speaker 1>talk more about women in politics, but first we're going

0:33:14.000 --> 0:33:16.120
<v Speaker 1>to take a quick break. But after that we'll talk

0:33:16.120 --> 0:33:19.280
<v Speaker 1>with a reporter who's gotten some of the closest access

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:22.960
<v Speaker 1>possible to Hillary Clinton, New York Magazine writer Rebecca tray Star.

0:33:23.360 --> 0:33:30.240
<v Speaker 1>But first, a word from our sponsors. Thanks so much

0:33:30.240 --> 0:33:32.680
<v Speaker 1>to our sponsors. Now let's get back to the show.

0:33:34.360 --> 0:33:37.760
<v Speaker 1>So we have Rebecca Treyster coming up next, and she's

0:33:37.800 --> 0:33:41.000
<v Speaker 1>covering the real life version of the story on Veep

0:33:41.040 --> 0:33:42.800
<v Speaker 1>of a woman running for president. And when you think

0:33:42.800 --> 0:33:47.120
<v Speaker 1>about it, Selena Meyer is a little bit Hillary and

0:33:47.200 --> 0:33:50.400
<v Speaker 1>a little Donald Trump. She probably has the worst qualities

0:33:50.440 --> 0:33:53.720
<v Speaker 1>of both of them. How lovely and charming, But that's

0:33:53.760 --> 0:33:56.920
<v Speaker 1>what makes the show so good because she's just on

0:33:57.000 --> 0:34:00.720
<v Speaker 1>so many levels intensely unlikable, but This ain't cannot be

0:34:00.800 --> 0:34:06.120
<v Speaker 1>said for Rebecca Tracer. She's so smart, so nice, and

0:34:06.200 --> 0:34:08.799
<v Speaker 1>a great reporter for New York Magazine. She spent a

0:34:08.800 --> 0:34:11.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of time on the campaign trail with Hillary Clinton,

0:34:11.000 --> 0:34:13.600
<v Speaker 1>and she's written a couple of books about women in

0:34:13.680 --> 0:34:17.440
<v Speaker 1>politics and women in society. And the latest is called

0:34:17.520 --> 0:34:19.960
<v Speaker 1>All the Single Ladies, All the Single Ladies, but it's

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:25.120
<v Speaker 1>only just one, All the Single Yes, I'm so happy

0:34:25.160 --> 0:34:27.319
<v Speaker 1>to have you here. Hi, Rebecca, Hi, I'm happy to

0:34:27.360 --> 0:34:30.000
<v Speaker 1>be here. Before we talk about the great work that

0:34:30.080 --> 0:34:33.040
<v Speaker 1>you've done. Um, tell me a little bit about yourself,

0:34:33.160 --> 0:34:36.080
<v Speaker 1>because you are a generation younger than me. I hate

0:34:36.120 --> 0:34:39.239
<v Speaker 1>to admit, what do you satan so quickly? Rebecca? I

0:34:39.280 --> 0:34:43.840
<v Speaker 1>hate that? But your forty one Tell me about how

0:34:44.040 --> 0:34:48.680
<v Speaker 1>you came to be interested in women's issues and why

0:34:48.760 --> 0:34:51.160
<v Speaker 1>you really wanted to focus on this in your writing

0:34:51.200 --> 0:34:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and your journalism. Well, I never imagined that I would

0:34:54.040 --> 0:34:57.000
<v Speaker 1>focus on it professionally because the era in which I

0:34:57.040 --> 0:34:58.600
<v Speaker 1>came of age. If you came of age in the

0:34:58.719 --> 0:35:01.400
<v Speaker 1>Helen Ready era, I came of age in the deep

0:35:01.600 --> 0:35:04.839
<v Speaker 1>frozen backlash tundra that followed. Right. So I was born

0:35:04.880 --> 0:35:07.680
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen seventy five, you were like in Susan Falut

0:35:08.080 --> 0:35:11.239
<v Speaker 1>I was. I was in Susan Faluti Land, honestly, and

0:35:11.320 --> 0:35:13.480
<v Speaker 1>so and you know, the year I went to college

0:35:13.520 --> 0:35:15.600
<v Speaker 1>was the year that Katie roy Fe's book The Morning After,

0:35:15.680 --> 0:35:18.360
<v Speaker 1>which sort of like you know, attacked the on campus

0:35:18.480 --> 0:35:22.160
<v Speaker 1>anti date rape movement. Um, it was a very profound

0:35:22.200 --> 0:35:24.880
<v Speaker 1>anti feminist moment in which I came of age and

0:35:24.920 --> 0:35:26.879
<v Speaker 1>was a teenager, and it never occurred to me then.

0:35:26.920 --> 0:35:29.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I did go to the two marches in

0:35:29.600 --> 0:35:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Washington two when I was a junior in high school

0:35:32.520 --> 0:35:35.000
<v Speaker 1>around reproductive rights, but somehow that was cut off from

0:35:35.040 --> 0:35:37.879
<v Speaker 1>any sense of a larger women's movement. There just wasn't

0:35:37.920 --> 0:35:41.600
<v Speaker 1>a sense of any kind of feminist cohesion. Um. In

0:35:41.680 --> 0:35:43.719
<v Speaker 1>feminism has never been a cohesive movement. But on the

0:35:43.760 --> 0:35:45.719
<v Speaker 1>other hand, there just wasn't a women's movement and it

0:35:45.800 --> 0:35:49.160
<v Speaker 1>never I actually couldn't have imagined that it would come

0:35:49.160 --> 0:35:52.959
<v Speaker 1>back in the way that it has wonderful ten years.

0:35:53.239 --> 0:35:55.200
<v Speaker 1>It is wonderful. I mean, I'm just waiting now for

0:35:55.239 --> 0:35:57.600
<v Speaker 1>the next wave of backlash. I have to say. It

0:35:57.760 --> 0:36:01.799
<v Speaker 1>is wonderful. Um want want, Yeah, I know, well, it's true,

0:36:01.840 --> 0:36:07.560
<v Speaker 1>it's coming. Prepare everybody gird um. Uh. It was really

0:36:07.640 --> 0:36:11.040
<v Speaker 1>around two thousand three when I took a job writing

0:36:11.040 --> 0:36:14.640
<v Speaker 1>for Salon, which was an internet publication. UM that I

0:36:14.680 --> 0:36:17.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of just took on a flyer as I started

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:19.920
<v Speaker 1>to write a little bit from a feminist perspective on

0:36:20.000 --> 0:36:23.359
<v Speaker 1>women's issues, and so there was this sort of um

0:36:23.600 --> 0:36:26.520
<v Speaker 1>blossoming of a new generation of feminism. But that didn't

0:36:26.520 --> 0:36:29.439
<v Speaker 1>happen until I was really in my mid to late twenties. Um,

0:36:29.480 --> 0:36:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I believe I wrote some pieces about you. I believe

0:36:31.600 --> 0:36:35.160
<v Speaker 1>you did. You should go back and review those pieces

0:36:35.160 --> 0:36:37.400
<v Speaker 1>and I can see if I'm actually happy to have

0:36:37.480 --> 0:36:41.920
<v Speaker 1>you here. I think you would be, I think, um.

0:36:41.960 --> 0:36:48.000
<v Speaker 1>And but then you know, suddenly women in presidential politics

0:36:48.840 --> 0:36:51.799
<v Speaker 1>became a very real reality. So I found myself in

0:36:51.840 --> 0:36:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the in the during the two thousand and eight election

0:36:54.080 --> 0:36:57.080
<v Speaker 1>writing about Hillary Clinton, which was the mother load, so

0:36:57.160 --> 0:37:00.680
<v Speaker 1>to speak, when it came to great material. I'm curious,

0:37:00.719 --> 0:37:03.879
<v Speaker 1>how is it different the coverage of Hillary Clinton from

0:37:03.880 --> 0:37:07.040
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and eight to this campaign, because I've been

0:37:07.040 --> 0:37:09.800
<v Speaker 1>thinking a lot about that, Rebecca. Because I was anchoring

0:37:09.840 --> 0:37:13.800
<v Speaker 1>the CBS Evening News, I remember being hyper vigilant and

0:37:14.320 --> 0:37:19.400
<v Speaker 1>hyper aware of sexism creeping in to the copy, creeping

0:37:19.440 --> 0:37:22.480
<v Speaker 1>into the pieces, and I was sort of like the

0:37:22.480 --> 0:37:26.720
<v Speaker 1>the safety patrol for feminists at CBS, at least during

0:37:26.760 --> 0:37:31.319
<v Speaker 1>my tenure. And I remember feeling outraged when I don't

0:37:31.320 --> 0:37:34.040
<v Speaker 1>know if you remember that one video clip where they

0:37:34.080 --> 0:37:38.560
<v Speaker 1>strung together all of the really obnoxious comments about Hillary

0:37:38.560 --> 0:37:40.959
<v Speaker 1>Clinton about her blouse or about her pants, or about

0:37:40.960 --> 0:37:43.160
<v Speaker 1>her weight, or about her laugh or about this, that

0:37:43.280 --> 0:37:46.960
<v Speaker 1>and the other thing. And I got so incensed, and

0:37:47.000 --> 0:37:49.880
<v Speaker 1>I remember actually saying to her, why does Sarah Palin

0:37:50.280 --> 0:37:54.759
<v Speaker 1>have an action figure and you have a nutcracker? She

0:37:54.880 --> 0:37:58.879
<v Speaker 1>laughed so loud. But do you think it's changed now

0:37:58.920 --> 0:38:01.439
<v Speaker 1>with the coverage of this campaign. I don't think it's

0:38:01.480 --> 0:38:05.000
<v Speaker 1>been entirely ameliorated. I think it's I think it is different.

0:38:05.239 --> 0:38:07.239
<v Speaker 1>You know, one of the clips that's very famous from

0:38:07.239 --> 0:38:10.120
<v Speaker 1>two thousand eight is somebody on Fox News saying, she's

0:38:10.160 --> 0:38:13.760
<v Speaker 1>like your ex wife standing outside of probate court. Um,

0:38:13.760 --> 0:38:17.400
<v Speaker 1>somebody to take out the garbage, you know, the hectoring wife.

0:38:17.640 --> 0:38:20.120
<v Speaker 1>It's like we've sharpened. There's a lot less commentary about

0:38:20.120 --> 0:38:23.520
<v Speaker 1>her clothes. In many ways, I think the media has

0:38:23.840 --> 0:38:26.920
<v Speaker 1>sharpened its vocabulary around sexism. I think two was a

0:38:26.920 --> 0:38:29.359
<v Speaker 1>tremendous learning experience for a lot of people in the media,

0:38:29.360 --> 0:38:31.600
<v Speaker 1>where they were like, oh right, those are code words

0:38:31.640 --> 0:38:33.960
<v Speaker 1>for bitch the place you still see it, and people

0:38:34.000 --> 0:38:36.080
<v Speaker 1>just can't help themselves. And I understand why, and we

0:38:36.120 --> 0:38:38.799
<v Speaker 1>can talk about it. It's her voice. We do hear

0:38:38.880 --> 0:38:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Hillary Clinton screaming into a microphone. A. She's not a

0:38:41.520 --> 0:38:46.520
<v Speaker 1>completely natural order. B. We are simply not used to

0:38:46.600 --> 0:38:49.840
<v Speaker 1>hearing this higher register. That's what I just read. I

0:38:49.920 --> 0:38:52.400
<v Speaker 1>just read a piece about this, saying that she needs

0:38:52.440 --> 0:38:55.439
<v Speaker 1>to speak less from her lungs and more have more

0:38:55.520 --> 0:38:58.840
<v Speaker 1>air in her stomach. And I know about this because

0:38:58.920 --> 0:39:01.520
<v Speaker 1>I had to learn it as well as a broadcaster.

0:39:02.000 --> 0:39:04.920
<v Speaker 1>But after an election where we have had Donald Trump

0:39:05.040 --> 0:39:09.920
<v Speaker 1>and Bernie Sanders like kings of yelling that we all

0:39:09.960 --> 0:39:12.959
<v Speaker 1>are sitting around wondering how we can make Hillary sound

0:39:13.040 --> 0:39:16.960
<v Speaker 1>better at a microphone. So there it's both based in

0:39:17.000 --> 0:39:19.600
<v Speaker 1>a kind of in a reality, which is that we

0:39:19.840 --> 0:39:24.239
<v Speaker 1>that tone doesn't comfort us, right, and we need to

0:39:24.280 --> 0:39:26.960
<v Speaker 1>address that. At the same time that it's like, well,

0:39:27.000 --> 0:39:30.120
<v Speaker 1>men can scream at us or comforter or speak softly

0:39:30.160 --> 0:39:32.480
<v Speaker 1>and warmly like Barack Obama, or slowly or they can

0:39:32.520 --> 0:39:35.120
<v Speaker 1>scream and we can still find them reassuring. It was interesting.

0:39:35.120 --> 0:39:38.160
<v Speaker 1>I think that there's been a reclamation project around her laugh.

0:39:38.239 --> 0:39:40.560
<v Speaker 1>I noticed was that Barack Obama, who in Philadelphia last

0:39:40.560 --> 0:39:43.080
<v Speaker 1>week said was I can't remember what the context was,

0:39:43.120 --> 0:39:45.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe it was in his speech and he was talking

0:39:45.040 --> 0:39:47.960
<v Speaker 1>about her laugh, her big laugh, and she's got this wonderful,

0:39:48.000 --> 0:39:54.400
<v Speaker 1>infectious laugh uh that uh carries quite far. And sometimes

0:39:54.400 --> 0:39:58.480
<v Speaker 1>it'll be surprising because you'll be in the middle and

0:39:58.600 --> 0:40:02.040
<v Speaker 1>there's a joy in a earth that I think sometimes

0:40:02.080 --> 0:40:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Bubba doesn't always see. Because that's one of the features

0:40:04.160 --> 0:40:06.040
<v Speaker 1>of Hillary Clinton that actually people talk about all the

0:40:06.040 --> 0:40:08.799
<v Speaker 1>time is how readily and how loudly she laughs. And

0:40:08.800 --> 0:40:11.759
<v Speaker 1>that's what's been cast as the cackle that you know,

0:40:12.200 --> 0:40:14.200
<v Speaker 1>all of it. But in fact, I think there's been

0:40:14.239 --> 0:40:17.279
<v Speaker 1>a decided project amongst her friends and colleagues to say, wait,

0:40:17.320 --> 0:40:21.680
<v Speaker 1>we gotta recast this laugh, branding the branding the laugh

0:40:21.760 --> 0:40:25.160
<v Speaker 1>as one of the like warm and appealing and you know,

0:40:25.440 --> 0:40:27.279
<v Speaker 1>one of the one of the appealing things about her,

0:40:27.320 --> 0:40:29.400
<v Speaker 1>instead of something that that we're going to only hear

0:40:29.400 --> 0:40:31.640
<v Speaker 1>about his off putting. So but yeah, all of this,

0:40:32.160 --> 0:40:34.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the big issue here is, and this is

0:40:34.920 --> 0:40:37.239
<v Speaker 1>part of what's radical, and it was radical with the

0:40:37.280 --> 0:40:39.719
<v Speaker 1>presidency of Barack Obama and will continue to be. It

0:40:39.880 --> 0:40:43.640
<v Speaker 1>is trading in all our models for what presidents look like,

0:40:43.719 --> 0:40:47.759
<v Speaker 1>for what political leadership looks like. And that really does

0:40:47.800 --> 0:40:50.680
<v Speaker 1>mean a national adjustment of our norms. As you say,

0:40:50.800 --> 0:40:52.759
<v Speaker 1>what went through your mind, Rebecca when she came out

0:40:52.800 --> 0:40:57.920
<v Speaker 1>in Philadelphia and there was this moment where it was

0:40:58.200 --> 0:41:03.480
<v Speaker 1>everyone had to acknowledge this was a new chapter in

0:41:03.520 --> 0:41:06.719
<v Speaker 1>American history. And just two days before that she talked

0:41:06.760 --> 0:41:09.359
<v Speaker 1>about the significance of her candidacy when she was on

0:41:09.400 --> 0:41:13.480
<v Speaker 1>that big jumbo screen. I'm happy for boys and men

0:41:13.960 --> 0:41:19.080
<v Speaker 1>because when any barrier falls in America, it clears the

0:41:19.200 --> 0:41:24.640
<v Speaker 1>way for everyone. In two thousand and eight, it seems

0:41:24.680 --> 0:41:29.720
<v Speaker 1>that she really wanted to deny her gender in many ways,

0:41:30.760 --> 0:41:35.160
<v Speaker 1>directly by the advice, was it pen or Dick Morris,

0:41:35.160 --> 0:41:37.200
<v Speaker 1>what Mark Penn? Yeah, by a lot of people, I mean,

0:41:37.320 --> 0:41:40.440
<v Speaker 1>and that wasn't a crazy piece of advice, given that

0:41:40.520 --> 0:41:42.279
<v Speaker 1>we again have no model for how to run a

0:41:42.280 --> 0:41:46.000
<v Speaker 1>woman successfully for the presidency and um, but it turned

0:41:46.000 --> 0:41:49.240
<v Speaker 1>out to be very bad advice for two eight. Of course,

0:41:49.280 --> 0:41:52.680
<v Speaker 1>we'll never forget that moment in New Hampshire when she

0:41:52.920 --> 0:41:56.240
<v Speaker 1>showed some emotion in that dinner talking about how challenging

0:41:56.320 --> 0:41:58.400
<v Speaker 1>it it was for her to run for president or

0:41:58.400 --> 0:42:02.400
<v Speaker 1>to be criticized or something. Um, And that was completely

0:42:02.520 --> 0:42:06.680
<v Speaker 1>against type and against what she was being advised to do.

0:42:07.320 --> 0:42:10.399
<v Speaker 1>And that was the moment where she seemed to catapult

0:42:11.120 --> 0:42:15.440
<v Speaker 1>higher up, you know, at a higher standing, right, yes, um.

0:42:15.680 --> 0:42:17.920
<v Speaker 1>Part of what was happening in that period in New

0:42:17.920 --> 0:42:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Hampshire was it was the most sexist media coverage that

0:42:20.920 --> 0:42:23.160
<v Speaker 1>she had gotten. She had lost Iowa and it's like

0:42:23.200 --> 0:42:25.960
<v Speaker 1>all of these guys, I'm using guys loosely, but it

0:42:26.000 --> 0:42:30.680
<v Speaker 1>was mostly guys in television media who like had to

0:42:30.719 --> 0:42:33.120
<v Speaker 1>be respectful. Ever for all this time, suddenly she was losing,

0:42:33.160 --> 0:42:34.920
<v Speaker 1>and there was like a dancing on her grave. I mean,

0:42:34.920 --> 0:42:36.400
<v Speaker 1>if you go back and listen to the way that

0:42:36.719 --> 0:42:39.200
<v Speaker 1>for example, Chris Matthews, who I like and respect very much,

0:42:39.200 --> 0:42:41.200
<v Speaker 1>and I you know, I detail this in the book

0:42:41.200 --> 0:42:43.879
<v Speaker 1>that I wrote about it. A lot of people were

0:42:43.920 --> 0:42:45.920
<v Speaker 1>just thrilled that Hillary was not only gonna lose, she

0:42:45.960 --> 0:42:47.680
<v Speaker 1>was gonna lose early, and she was going to be humiliated.

0:42:47.719 --> 0:42:50.920
<v Speaker 1>And there was all of this really premature grave dancing

0:42:50.920 --> 0:42:53.560
<v Speaker 1>in those days between Iowa and New Hampshire and the

0:42:53.640 --> 0:42:56.360
<v Speaker 1>moment that she cried. I mean, at the time, I

0:42:56.440 --> 0:42:58.960
<v Speaker 1>was somebody who was not terrifically sympathetic to Hillary Clinton,

0:42:59.239 --> 0:43:01.880
<v Speaker 1>and I had become so enraged listening to the media

0:43:01.920 --> 0:43:05.239
<v Speaker 1>get excited about her impending doom, and it's it's like

0:43:05.360 --> 0:43:08.080
<v Speaker 1>it had all come into focus for me. It obviously

0:43:08.120 --> 0:43:10.600
<v Speaker 1>made her more vulnerable, and I think powerful women become

0:43:10.640 --> 0:43:13.600
<v Speaker 1>more palatable and more appealing when they show us their vulnerabilities.

0:43:13.880 --> 0:43:16.360
<v Speaker 1>But there's something else about women and crying, which is

0:43:16.520 --> 0:43:18.239
<v Speaker 1>crying for many of us, is the way that we

0:43:18.280 --> 0:43:20.799
<v Speaker 1>expressed that we're incredibly piste off. I mean, I think

0:43:20.800 --> 0:43:24.239
<v Speaker 1>the relationship between showing emotion and anger. And by the way,

0:43:24.280 --> 0:43:26.239
<v Speaker 1>I should also clarify, she didn't cry. There's not a

0:43:26.239 --> 0:43:31.640
<v Speaker 1>single tear that fell from her eyes. She gets stuffy, okay,

0:43:31.640 --> 0:43:34.719
<v Speaker 1>But but there was something about that. I'm not sure

0:43:34.760 --> 0:43:36.840
<v Speaker 1>that it was just that we all, like our sisters,

0:43:36.840 --> 0:43:38.799
<v Speaker 1>weep be right, which was sort of the red of

0:43:38.800 --> 0:43:41.120
<v Speaker 1>the media. I think it was there were a lot

0:43:41.120 --> 0:43:42.799
<v Speaker 1>of women in New Hampshire and they're the voters who

0:43:42.880 --> 0:43:45.200
<v Speaker 1>surprisingly put her over the top. In New Hampshire, and

0:43:45.239 --> 0:43:48.360
<v Speaker 1>she staged a huge surprise win in New Hampshire like

0:43:48.400 --> 0:43:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the next day, and I actually think it was a

0:43:51.000 --> 0:43:53.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of angry women. I sort of see it that

0:43:53.480 --> 0:43:57.600
<v Speaker 1>moment as being more about anger than about like a

0:43:57.680 --> 0:44:01.440
<v Speaker 1>sort of soggy vulnerability. But it is true that the

0:44:01.480 --> 0:44:04.000
<v Speaker 1>moments in two thousand eight when she successfully talked about

0:44:04.000 --> 0:44:06.120
<v Speaker 1>her place in history, and that she was able to

0:44:06.120 --> 0:44:08.720
<v Speaker 1>do so in a way that was compelling and inspiring

0:44:08.719 --> 0:44:11.680
<v Speaker 1>to people, were the moments of loss. So the greatest

0:44:11.719 --> 0:44:14.560
<v Speaker 1>speech she gave in two thousand eight was the concession

0:44:14.560 --> 0:44:17.200
<v Speaker 1>speech about the glass, about the glass ceiling, and about

0:44:17.239 --> 0:44:19.320
<v Speaker 1>for me, I mean the parts of it that about

0:44:19.320 --> 0:44:21.880
<v Speaker 1>shooting fifty women into space, which was an is incredible

0:44:21.880 --> 0:44:24.759
<v Speaker 1>piece of speech writing the fiftie woman to leave this

0:44:25.000 --> 0:44:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Earth is orbiting overhead. If we can blast fifty women

0:44:29.520 --> 0:44:33.120
<v Speaker 1>into space, we will someday launch a woman into the

0:44:33.120 --> 0:44:47.239
<v Speaker 1>White House. And although we weren't able, the shadow that

0:44:47.520 --> 0:44:51.960
<v Speaker 1>highest hardest glass ceiling this time, thanks to you, it's

0:44:52.000 --> 0:45:01.480
<v Speaker 1>got about eighteen million tracks in it, and the light

0:45:01.840 --> 0:45:06.560
<v Speaker 1>is shining through like never before, filling us all with

0:45:06.600 --> 0:45:09.759
<v Speaker 1>the hope and the sure knowledge that the path will

0:45:09.800 --> 0:45:12.719
<v Speaker 1>be a little easier next time. Um. That was a

0:45:12.719 --> 0:45:15.240
<v Speaker 1>beautiful speech, and she really marked her place in history.

0:45:15.719 --> 0:45:18.920
<v Speaker 1>And but that was also a moment where she was

0:45:18.960 --> 0:45:21.799
<v Speaker 1>no longer a threat. We do not like women who

0:45:21.840 --> 0:45:24.160
<v Speaker 1>talk about how great they are, but of course that

0:45:24.280 --> 0:45:27.319
<v Speaker 1>is the job of a politician running for office. And

0:45:27.360 --> 0:45:29.160
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that she was free to do

0:45:29.239 --> 0:45:31.560
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and eight when she lost was sort

0:45:31.560 --> 0:45:33.319
<v Speaker 1>of talk about how great she was, or at least

0:45:33.320 --> 0:45:36.040
<v Speaker 1>how historical she was in a way that wasn't threatening

0:45:36.040 --> 0:45:38.040
<v Speaker 1>anymore because she wasn't up for the job. But don't

0:45:38.040 --> 0:45:40.919
<v Speaker 1>we dislike when men talk about how great they are too?

0:45:40.920 --> 0:45:44.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean I I get turned off by conceited people

0:45:44.719 --> 0:45:47.560
<v Speaker 1>in general, right well, and then in a political context

0:45:47.600 --> 0:45:49.719
<v Speaker 1>they're supposed to be running for office. There of course

0:45:49.760 --> 0:45:51.880
<v Speaker 1>they're out there telling us that they're better than their opponent.

0:45:52.400 --> 0:45:55.000
<v Speaker 1>But that's still disconcerting and hard for us to hear,

0:45:55.440 --> 0:45:57.520
<v Speaker 1>or at least hard for us to feel warmly about

0:45:57.840 --> 0:46:00.799
<v Speaker 1>when it's a woman. And I think it's especially true

0:46:00.800 --> 0:46:02.160
<v Speaker 1>by the way. I think it's going to get easier

0:46:02.200 --> 0:46:04.080
<v Speaker 1>for her now that she's in the general. That was

0:46:04.239 --> 0:46:07.520
<v Speaker 1>especially true when the people she's addressing or people who

0:46:07.600 --> 0:46:10.440
<v Speaker 1>are divided in their loyalties between her and Bernie Sanders

0:46:10.440 --> 0:46:13.120
<v Speaker 1>in this past race, and between her and Barack Obama

0:46:13.200 --> 0:46:16.320
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand eight, another person who has good politics.

0:46:16.360 --> 0:46:19.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean, she you're you're dividing your natural base because

0:46:20.200 --> 0:46:23.200
<v Speaker 1>everybody sort of has the same ideas about policy and ideology.

0:46:23.280 --> 0:46:25.880
<v Speaker 1>And you have these two candidates who probably many of

0:46:25.960 --> 0:46:28.400
<v Speaker 1>us felt warmly about in one way or another. And

0:46:28.440 --> 0:46:30.759
<v Speaker 1>it's even harder to hear the woman saying I am

0:46:30.840 --> 0:46:34.399
<v Speaker 1>essentially saying I'm the better candidate for this job than

0:46:34.440 --> 0:46:37.960
<v Speaker 1>that guy. That is still very discomfiting for us. I

0:46:38.000 --> 0:46:41.879
<v Speaker 1>would say this time around, she embraced her gender much

0:46:41.880 --> 0:46:47.239
<v Speaker 1>more enthusiastically. Why well, I think she realized it had

0:46:47.239 --> 0:46:49.440
<v Speaker 1>been a mistake in two thousand eight. I mean, there

0:46:49.520 --> 0:46:52.439
<v Speaker 1>was there are lessons that I think she drew from

0:46:52.640 --> 0:46:57.040
<v Speaker 1>Barack Obama's campaign correctly. Um. He also was very careful

0:46:57.080 --> 0:46:58.839
<v Speaker 1>and had to be in terms of how he talked

0:46:58.880 --> 0:47:02.120
<v Speaker 1>about race. But what he was very successful at was

0:47:02.200 --> 0:47:04.879
<v Speaker 1>making this kind of emotional compact with voters, like we're

0:47:04.880 --> 0:47:07.719
<v Speaker 1>making history together, We're doing this important thing. We can

0:47:07.760 --> 0:47:11.240
<v Speaker 1>all feel good about ourselves because we are working towards

0:47:11.280 --> 0:47:15.200
<v Speaker 1>something that is very overdue and a grave injustice in

0:47:15.239 --> 0:47:17.560
<v Speaker 1>the United States, and we're working towards a small correction

0:47:17.600 --> 0:47:21.239
<v Speaker 1>of it that will actually be a big correction of it. Um,

0:47:21.320 --> 0:47:24.319
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't work, it's it's not a parallel set of

0:47:24.520 --> 0:47:28.120
<v Speaker 1>strategies around around women's progress in the United States. But

0:47:28.160 --> 0:47:29.840
<v Speaker 1>I think that she took some lesson, which is that

0:47:29.880 --> 0:47:33.400
<v Speaker 1>people want to feel celebratory and good about making history,

0:47:33.760 --> 0:47:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and this is making history. This country has a hard

0:47:37.200 --> 0:47:44.200
<v Speaker 1>time unambivalently celebrating milestones and women's rights. It's very complicated,

0:47:44.239 --> 0:47:46.239
<v Speaker 1>and it's and it's very fraught, and Hillary is walking

0:47:46.320 --> 0:47:48.799
<v Speaker 1>right into that. It's also fraught because of who she

0:47:49.000 --> 0:47:52.839
<v Speaker 1>is and the baggage she brings to the conversation. Absolutely

0:47:52.920 --> 0:47:55.600
<v Speaker 1>she brings. But on the other hand, taking apart who

0:47:55.680 --> 0:47:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Hillary is and who she's become and how she's become

0:47:58.239 --> 0:48:01.280
<v Speaker 1>that way, you can't do that with also without looking

0:48:01.320 --> 0:48:05.759
<v Speaker 1>at her as somebody who is formed, um by being

0:48:05.840 --> 0:48:12.279
<v Speaker 1>this rather anomalous woman in an extremely male world. I mean,

0:48:12.280 --> 0:48:14.320
<v Speaker 1>there's which is not to make excuses. That's not the

0:48:14.360 --> 0:48:18.719
<v Speaker 1>same thing as making excuses for the various negative things

0:48:18.719 --> 0:48:21.239
<v Speaker 1>about Hillary Clinton and and there are many of them. Um.

0:48:21.280 --> 0:48:23.880
<v Speaker 1>But it is to say that it's not an accident

0:48:23.960 --> 0:48:27.080
<v Speaker 1>that this is the candidate we got right, we didn't.

0:48:27.120 --> 0:48:29.799
<v Speaker 1>It's not a passive, you know, sort of quirk of

0:48:29.920 --> 0:48:32.080
<v Speaker 1>nature that this is the person who bubbled up to

0:48:32.120 --> 0:48:35.080
<v Speaker 1>be the first woman president. Right to some degree, Hillary

0:48:35.080 --> 0:48:38.200
<v Speaker 1>Clinton was also made by the very history that she

0:48:38.320 --> 0:48:41.920
<v Speaker 1>is now campaigning to change. If that makes any sense,

0:48:42.000 --> 0:48:44.880
<v Speaker 1>it does, it does, and it doesn't because I think

0:48:46.880 --> 0:48:50.319
<v Speaker 1>you have to also consider the Clinton legacy and the

0:48:50.360 --> 0:48:54.799
<v Speaker 1>Clinton baggage in general. It's not just Hillary Clinton. It's

0:48:55.800 --> 0:48:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I understand what you're saying on one level, but I

0:48:58.200 --> 0:49:03.920
<v Speaker 1>also wonder if there would be the possibility of a

0:49:04.000 --> 0:49:07.279
<v Speaker 1>woman without quite this much baggage, with the kind of

0:49:07.360 --> 0:49:10.080
<v Speaker 1>choices and judgments that had been made in the past,

0:49:10.239 --> 0:49:12.880
<v Speaker 1>to rise to the surface. Sure there will be a

0:49:12.920 --> 0:49:15.719
<v Speaker 1>woman who comes after her who has none of this baggage, right,

0:49:15.840 --> 0:49:18.759
<v Speaker 1>or who has a different set of baggage. But but

0:49:18.800 --> 0:49:20.840
<v Speaker 1>if you look at the history of women in American politics,

0:49:20.960 --> 0:49:24.040
<v Speaker 1>the first women, the first mayors, the first representatives, the

0:49:24.040 --> 0:49:28.120
<v Speaker 1>first governors, um, almost all of them arrived there in

0:49:28.160 --> 0:49:30.880
<v Speaker 1>one way or another via the widows mandate or taking

0:49:30.920 --> 0:49:35.120
<v Speaker 1>over their father's Here, I mean, historically speaking, it was

0:49:35.280 --> 0:49:39.080
<v Speaker 1>practically inevitable that the first female president was probably going

0:49:39.120 --> 0:49:43.400
<v Speaker 1>to have a strong relationship to a male president. In

0:49:43.400 --> 0:49:47.600
<v Speaker 1>in our history, proximity to power has been the closest

0:49:47.600 --> 0:49:49.759
<v Speaker 1>that most women have gotten to power, and therefore the

0:49:49.760 --> 0:49:52.279
<v Speaker 1>first women to actually break through have been the ones

0:49:52.320 --> 0:49:55.680
<v Speaker 1>who started with proximal power and necessary rung on the

0:49:55.719 --> 0:49:58.120
<v Speaker 1>ladder if you will, I mean, I think even if

0:49:58.160 --> 0:50:02.960
<v Speaker 1>she doesn't get elected, h the mark of her political

0:50:03.040 --> 0:50:05.440
<v Speaker 1>legacy is so big, both between two thousand and eight

0:50:05.800 --> 0:50:08.600
<v Speaker 1>and this year, that it is already readjusted. She's helped

0:50:08.600 --> 0:50:11.640
<v Speaker 1>already to readjust our eyes and ears to the idea

0:50:11.760 --> 0:50:13.680
<v Speaker 1>of what somebody could look like on a presidential stage.

0:50:13.680 --> 0:50:15.279
<v Speaker 1>He's not a white guy. I have to ask you

0:50:15.280 --> 0:50:18.760
<v Speaker 1>about the white pants suit, because I didn't realize until

0:50:19.120 --> 0:50:24.000
<v Speaker 1>recently how symbolic that was that Geraldine Ferraro wore white.

0:50:24.160 --> 0:50:28.040
<v Speaker 1>For example, and there have been other examples, the Suffragets.

0:50:28.120 --> 0:50:30.440
<v Speaker 1>It was it was the color of the suffragists. These

0:50:30.480 --> 0:50:35.560
<v Speaker 1>suffragists wore white with gold and purple um sashes. So

0:50:35.640 --> 0:50:38.160
<v Speaker 1>that was probably no mistake. Wasn't that she wore a

0:50:38.160 --> 0:50:40.560
<v Speaker 1>white pant suit, which I thought looked really nice. By

0:50:40.560 --> 0:50:42.600
<v Speaker 1>the way, is that wrong for me to say I'm

0:50:42.600 --> 0:50:44.279
<v Speaker 1>all by the way, I should say. We we talked

0:50:44.360 --> 0:50:48.080
<v Speaker 1>earlier about sort of being critical about clothes. I'm on

0:50:48.120 --> 0:50:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the bandwagon for discussing clothes because that's part of the history. Again,

0:50:51.719 --> 0:50:55.080
<v Speaker 1>we've never had a president who wore pant suits, who

0:50:55.239 --> 0:50:57.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, had to worry about cleavage. And in two

0:50:57.800 --> 0:50:59.520
<v Speaker 1>thousand eight, there was an article in the Washington Post

0:50:59.520 --> 0:51:03.080
<v Speaker 1>about Hillary is clevange, but she never really bugged me,

0:51:03.160 --> 0:51:05.040
<v Speaker 1>by the way, I'm glad you brought that up, because

0:51:05.080 --> 0:51:09.040
<v Speaker 1>that really annoyed me, the tone and angle of that story.

0:51:09.080 --> 0:51:12.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't mind sort of discussing it because it's something

0:51:12.760 --> 0:51:16.200
<v Speaker 1>that people notice and think about and contemplate. But I

0:51:16.239 --> 0:51:19.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't like. I just don't. I didn't like the way

0:51:19.400 --> 0:51:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the person wrote that piece. That's very fair. The thing

0:51:22.680 --> 0:51:26.000
<v Speaker 1>I would defend is the noting, for example, that she

0:51:26.080 --> 0:51:29.080
<v Speaker 1>wore white when she accepted the nomination. And we can't

0:51:29.080 --> 0:51:32.200
<v Speaker 1>be so uptight that we can't talk about it. I

0:51:32.239 --> 0:51:37.680
<v Speaker 1>just wish men had more interesting garments to sport, because

0:51:37.719 --> 0:51:40.880
<v Speaker 1>they're so boring. There's nothing to really talk about, and

0:51:40.920 --> 0:51:43.000
<v Speaker 1>that's why, you know, when I did the CBS Evening News,

0:51:43.040 --> 0:51:46.359
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people commented on my clothes and my

0:51:46.440 --> 0:51:49.360
<v Speaker 1>hair and my makeup and the way I held my hands,

0:51:49.560 --> 0:51:54.320
<v Speaker 1>and it was you know, there's a fine line of noticing, appreciating,

0:51:54.680 --> 0:51:59.520
<v Speaker 1>even discussing, and having that be the prevalent thing that

0:51:59.680 --> 0:52:02.400
<v Speaker 1>is coming for people, right And the amount of energy

0:52:02.440 --> 0:52:04.800
<v Speaker 1>that you I mean, I imagine that you spent having

0:52:04.840 --> 0:52:08.240
<v Speaker 1>even to listen to that stuff compared to your male predecessors,

0:52:08.320 --> 0:52:10.319
<v Speaker 1>to your male colleagues. I'm sure that was also true

0:52:10.320 --> 0:52:12.799
<v Speaker 1>on the Today Show. I mean, I'm pretty sure you

0:52:12.800 --> 0:52:16.720
<v Speaker 1>think anybody is Do you think anybody discusses what Scott

0:52:16.800 --> 0:52:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Pelley is wearing during an interview? Ever? Ever? But anyway,

0:52:21.200 --> 0:52:25.080
<v Speaker 1>enough about me, Let's talk about Hillary and how she

0:52:25.239 --> 0:52:27.239
<v Speaker 1>was able to just to put a button on this

0:52:27.360 --> 0:52:33.160
<v Speaker 1>clothing conversation neutralize the whole discussion about what she was wearing.

0:52:33.200 --> 0:52:35.440
<v Speaker 1>I read. I mean, it's so interesting to me, Rebucca,

0:52:35.440 --> 0:52:37.920
<v Speaker 1>I just read a whole piece on how pants suit?

0:52:38.040 --> 0:52:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Why are women wearing pants suits and men wearing suits?

0:52:41.640 --> 0:52:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Pant suits? The term started to be used in the

0:52:44.239 --> 0:52:47.719
<v Speaker 1>eighteen sixties, when little boys were shorts with their jackets,

0:52:48.040 --> 0:52:53.280
<v Speaker 1>and there is something slightly demeaning about pants in santalizing rights,

0:52:53.480 --> 0:52:55.399
<v Speaker 1>which is what we That's one of the ways we

0:52:55.680 --> 0:52:57.840
<v Speaker 1>deal with women is we treat them like their children

0:52:58.360 --> 0:53:00.440
<v Speaker 1>if we're going to indulge the clothes thing for more. Second,

0:53:00.480 --> 0:53:04.520
<v Speaker 1>I have to say that my very favorite sartorial period

0:53:04.680 --> 0:53:08.120
<v Speaker 1>for Rillery was when she was Secretary of State. She

0:53:08.200 --> 0:53:10.840
<v Speaker 1>started wearing these big pattern dresses. I thought about it, like,

0:53:10.880 --> 0:53:13.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean, kind of move moves I mean, and it's like,

0:53:13.480 --> 0:53:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the thing about that period was that the

0:53:15.160 --> 0:53:17.760
<v Speaker 1>way she was dressing and handling herself, she was so busy,

0:53:17.800 --> 0:53:19.640
<v Speaker 1>and it seemed like she was so powerful and like

0:53:19.719 --> 0:53:22.759
<v Speaker 1>she just didn't give a ship for me. It was

0:53:22.800 --> 0:53:26.440
<v Speaker 1>her at her most sort of beautiful. If I'm going

0:53:26.480 --> 0:53:29.399
<v Speaker 1>to evaluate the sartorial choices, but now I think she's

0:53:29.400 --> 0:53:31.839
<v Speaker 1>so busy it's just as easy to have a set

0:53:31.840 --> 0:53:33.839
<v Speaker 1>of pants suits. And she knew that if she wore

0:53:33.880 --> 0:53:36.240
<v Speaker 1>a big pattern dress right now on the presidential trail,

0:53:36.719 --> 0:53:39.680
<v Speaker 1>I would never hear the end of it. It would

0:53:39.680 --> 0:53:43.600
<v Speaker 1>be armageddon. So you know, Hillary has very bad numbers

0:53:43.600 --> 0:53:47.480
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to trustworthiness, no surprise and likability, but

0:53:47.640 --> 0:53:51.359
<v Speaker 1>so does Donald Trump on the likability front. How much

0:53:51.360 --> 0:53:56.480
<v Speaker 1>of the I don't trust her is a proxy for

0:53:57.120 --> 0:54:01.759
<v Speaker 1>good old fashioned sexism in your view, well a lot

0:54:01.800 --> 0:54:04.480
<v Speaker 1>of it. Um. I'm actually in the midst of writing

0:54:04.520 --> 0:54:08.720
<v Speaker 1>a piece, um that delves into the history of distrust

0:54:08.960 --> 0:54:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and women and the way that we can talk about

0:54:11.680 --> 0:54:16.920
<v Speaker 1>women is fundamentally unreliable, as deceptive, um, as a way

0:54:17.000 --> 0:54:21.440
<v Speaker 1>of diminishing their potential power of the history and that

0:54:21.760 --> 0:54:23.680
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. I mean, I I interviewed somebody, so

0:54:23.760 --> 0:54:26.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm I'm writing this piece, and I interviewed a professor

0:54:27.200 --> 0:54:29.239
<v Speaker 1>who said to me for and it was such a

0:54:29.239 --> 0:54:32.440
<v Speaker 1>great point. She said, whenever we talk about our dislike

0:54:32.520 --> 0:54:34.879
<v Speaker 1>for women, so often it comes down to the fact

0:54:34.880 --> 0:54:36.400
<v Speaker 1>that you just can't trust them in a way that

0:54:36.440 --> 0:54:38.640
<v Speaker 1>goes back to the Bible. I mean, this sense that

0:54:38.719 --> 0:54:43.640
<v Speaker 1>women are fundamentally deceptive and duplicitous is an extremely old

0:54:43.920 --> 0:54:46.560
<v Speaker 1>theme with Hillary Clinton. You have somebody if you're just

0:54:46.600 --> 0:54:50.239
<v Speaker 1>going to compare Clinton and Trump on this on this ground, right,

0:54:50.960 --> 0:54:54.440
<v Speaker 1>they're all these like PolitiFact rates, you know, people's truthfulness,

0:54:54.440 --> 0:54:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and if you look at the charts of sort of

0:54:56.239 --> 0:54:59.279
<v Speaker 1>twenty of the most powerful politicians in the country, right now,

0:54:59.480 --> 0:55:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Hillary come is in second, right below Barack Obama and

0:55:04.360 --> 0:55:07.680
<v Speaker 1>just above Bernie Sanders and Jeb Bush. Interestingly as a

0:55:07.719 --> 0:55:11.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of most truthful politician. Jill Abramson, who was another

0:55:11.080 --> 0:55:13.480
<v Speaker 1>female first and she was the former editor of the

0:55:13.480 --> 0:55:15.560
<v Speaker 1>New York Times, wrote a big piece in The Guardian

0:55:15.640 --> 0:55:18.600
<v Speaker 1>about as somebody who had been in charge of all

0:55:18.640 --> 0:55:23.280
<v Speaker 1>these investigations into Hillary Clinton's purported malfeasance. What she found,

0:55:23.400 --> 0:55:27.279
<v Speaker 1>after having reported on it and edited pieces about these

0:55:27.440 --> 0:55:31.800
<v Speaker 1>massive investigations, was that she was a fundamentally honest person. Um.

0:55:31.840 --> 0:55:36.000
<v Speaker 1>And yet these allegations that she's that she's duplicit as

0:55:36.120 --> 0:55:38.080
<v Speaker 1>stick to her. We just can't trust her. There's something

0:55:38.080 --> 0:55:40.640
<v Speaker 1>about her we can't trust. It is irrational based on

0:55:40.719 --> 0:55:43.040
<v Speaker 1>what we actually know. And we can take one story

0:55:43.120 --> 0:55:45.840
<v Speaker 1>like the emails, um, you know, the fact that she

0:55:45.880 --> 0:55:48.799
<v Speaker 1>did her own she set up our own server and

0:55:48.800 --> 0:55:51.960
<v Speaker 1>went around and that can be our evidence, um and

0:55:52.040 --> 0:55:55.600
<v Speaker 1>fair enough, except that Colin Powell also, you know, operated

0:55:55.640 --> 0:55:59.040
<v Speaker 1>in similar ways with regard to the emails there. I mean,

0:55:59.080 --> 0:56:03.040
<v Speaker 1>but in fairness, wasn't the FBI investigation. She didn't say

0:56:03.120 --> 0:56:07.320
<v Speaker 1>I never sent classified information where there was classified information.

0:56:07.320 --> 0:56:10.279
<v Speaker 1>According to COMI on seven of those email changes. I

0:56:10.280 --> 0:56:14.520
<v Speaker 1>mean it's it's not quite. It's not as cut and

0:56:14.560 --> 0:56:19.560
<v Speaker 1>dried as that. And that's why, in many ways, I

0:56:19.560 --> 0:56:23.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know that Hillary Clinton's um dishonesty, which is and

0:56:24.000 --> 0:56:25.960
<v Speaker 1>there are moments of it. I don't know that that

0:56:26.000 --> 0:56:30.280
<v Speaker 1>sets her apart from politicians. Politicians are known to be dishonest,

0:56:30.280 --> 0:56:33.080
<v Speaker 1>and Hillary Clinton is a politician who is sometimes dishonest.

0:56:33.280 --> 0:56:34.840
<v Speaker 1>The way in which it is blown up to be

0:56:34.880 --> 0:56:37.880
<v Speaker 1>the most salient feature of Hillary Clinton, I think flies

0:56:37.880 --> 0:56:40.320
<v Speaker 1>in the face of rationality. Then you look at somebody

0:56:40.320 --> 0:56:43.680
<v Speaker 1>like Donald Trump. Donald Trump delights in lying to us

0:56:43.800 --> 0:56:46.759
<v Speaker 1>every day. He takes pleasure in it. He contradicts the

0:56:46.760 --> 0:56:48.799
<v Speaker 1>thing he said the day before. He tells you something

0:56:48.840 --> 0:56:52.560
<v Speaker 1>that is easily disprovable with like four seconds on Google.

0:56:53.080 --> 0:56:57.600
<v Speaker 1>He it's like he practically enjoys getting away with the stuff.

0:56:57.600 --> 0:57:00.520
<v Speaker 1>And when we talk when when when voters talk positively

0:57:00.520 --> 0:57:02.440
<v Speaker 1>about what they like about Donald Trump, what is it?

0:57:02.480 --> 0:57:05.160
<v Speaker 1>He's a straight talker. He tells it like it is.

0:57:05.640 --> 0:57:08.799
<v Speaker 1>He says the things we're thinking and can't say. Right

0:57:09.080 --> 0:57:13.200
<v Speaker 1>he is. There's something transparent and even though he's disliked,

0:57:13.239 --> 0:57:16.360
<v Speaker 1>you're right. He also has very bad favorability numbers. The

0:57:16.720 --> 0:57:19.000
<v Speaker 1>reason that people one of the reasons people say they

0:57:19.000 --> 0:57:21.920
<v Speaker 1>like him is because there's something just straightforward about him.

0:57:22.000 --> 0:57:26.320
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I think it's probably gendered in ways that

0:57:26.400 --> 0:57:31.120
<v Speaker 1>are very deep and very complicated. Conversely, what we're seeing

0:57:31.400 --> 0:57:35.720
<v Speaker 1>happen in the Trump campaign is fascinating in terms of

0:57:35.760 --> 0:57:40.880
<v Speaker 1>it's I would say cluelessness about women's issues, as evidenced

0:57:41.280 --> 0:57:45.520
<v Speaker 1>by the comments he has made recently about sexual harassment.

0:57:45.840 --> 0:57:48.120
<v Speaker 1>I would say I got into television when harass was

0:57:48.160 --> 0:57:51.400
<v Speaker 1>two words instead of one. It's a very good line,

0:57:51.440 --> 0:57:53.720
<v Speaker 1>thank you. It always gets a laugh. I also say

0:57:53.720 --> 0:57:57.720
<v Speaker 1>that gravitas is Latin for testicles. So obviously I come

0:57:57.880 --> 0:58:01.560
<v Speaker 1>to this from a very unique and probably specific point

0:58:01.600 --> 0:58:07.040
<v Speaker 1>of view. But I thought watching this conversation about sexual

0:58:07.080 --> 0:58:09.960
<v Speaker 1>harassment of the workplace has been fascinating because I feel

0:58:10.040 --> 0:58:12.200
<v Speaker 1>that I have been in a time machine and taken

0:58:12.240 --> 0:58:15.360
<v Speaker 1>back to a Mad Men episode in terms of the

0:58:15.440 --> 0:58:19.600
<v Speaker 1>understanding of sexual harassment by Donald Trump, when he says

0:58:19.840 --> 0:58:22.840
<v Speaker 1>if Ivanka was treated like that, I think she wouldn't

0:58:22.880 --> 0:58:24.959
<v Speaker 1>put up with it, or she would go get another job,

0:58:25.080 --> 0:58:28.720
<v Speaker 1>or she right Um and even her brother saying similar

0:58:28.760 --> 0:58:32.600
<v Speaker 1>things too tough and strong that would never happen to her. So, um,

0:58:33.680 --> 0:58:36.040
<v Speaker 1>what do you think of those comments? My perspective on

0:58:36.120 --> 0:58:38.800
<v Speaker 1>them is that they're probably not as clueless as we think.

0:58:39.320 --> 0:58:42.919
<v Speaker 1>You know, you think they're playing Yeah, well, I think

0:58:42.960 --> 0:58:45.880
<v Speaker 1>their cluelessness is part of their appeal to the audience.

0:58:45.960 --> 0:58:50.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that Donald Trump takes a pride in and

0:58:50.400 --> 0:58:53.360
<v Speaker 1>understands that part of his popularity is based on the

0:58:53.360 --> 0:58:56.360
<v Speaker 1>fact that his worldview when it comes to gender and

0:58:56.440 --> 0:59:01.000
<v Speaker 1>race is rooted in a madman or uh that is.

0:59:01.320 --> 0:59:02.880
<v Speaker 1>I thought at the beginning of his campaign that there

0:59:02.880 --> 0:59:05.520
<v Speaker 1>would be corrections of this stuff, And the more I

0:59:05.560 --> 0:59:08.720
<v Speaker 1>see it continue, and you know, these kind of comments

0:59:08.760 --> 0:59:12.480
<v Speaker 1>grow worse, the more I suspect that this is in

0:59:12.520 --> 0:59:14.880
<v Speaker 1>fact what he's running on. He's not going to correct

0:59:14.920 --> 0:59:18.040
<v Speaker 1>it because it's part of what makes his base love him.

0:59:18.280 --> 0:59:19.800
<v Speaker 1>There was a video published on the New York Times

0:59:19.800 --> 0:59:25.840
<v Speaker 1>website that that shows unedited comments from Trump supporters, and

0:59:26.000 --> 0:59:29.320
<v Speaker 1>it is clear that part and they are racist epithets,

0:59:29.760 --> 0:59:33.280
<v Speaker 1>sexist epithets. And what becomes clear watching at least the

0:59:33.360 --> 0:59:35.520
<v Speaker 1>enthusiasm at those rallies, which are of course part of

0:59:35.520 --> 0:59:39.840
<v Speaker 1>what's powering his popularity that there's excitement that there is

0:59:39.880 --> 0:59:42.840
<v Speaker 1>a guy who would still be clueless about sexual harassment

0:59:42.840 --> 0:59:45.000
<v Speaker 1>and take a perverse kind of pride in it, who

0:59:45.120 --> 0:59:50.320
<v Speaker 1>doesn't care about sexual harassment, who does view women and

0:59:50.640 --> 0:59:54.439
<v Speaker 1>black people um as subsidiary populations in some way over

0:59:54.480 --> 0:59:58.120
<v Speaker 1>whom he exerts a kind of authority. That is part

0:59:58.240 --> 1:00:02.800
<v Speaker 1>And so I have, yes, maybe clueless, but the expression

1:00:02.800 --> 1:00:05.280
<v Speaker 1>of his cluelessness I don't think is an error on

1:00:05.360 --> 1:00:07.680
<v Speaker 1>his part. I think it is part of what he

1:00:07.720 --> 1:00:11.479
<v Speaker 1>is running on. Sometimes I wonder about the women's vote

1:00:11.520 --> 1:00:16.360
<v Speaker 1>because I think about the wives and many of these disenfranchised, alienated,

1:00:16.480 --> 1:00:22.160
<v Speaker 1>working class voters who are perhaps more traditional and live

1:00:22.200 --> 1:00:25.880
<v Speaker 1>in areas that are less urban. Are we discounting the

1:00:25.920 --> 1:00:30.720
<v Speaker 1>possibility that in some cases women adapt the political positions

1:00:30.840 --> 1:00:34.280
<v Speaker 1>of their husbands. No, that's real. Married women vote Republican.

1:00:34.960 --> 1:00:37.800
<v Speaker 1>So white women vote Republican. So is it too big

1:00:37.800 --> 1:00:40.360
<v Speaker 1>a stretch to say that women are gonna come out

1:00:40.400 --> 1:00:42.560
<v Speaker 1>for Hillary and she's going to do super well? Too

1:00:42.560 --> 1:00:45.360
<v Speaker 1>big a stretch? The populations of women who come out

1:00:45.400 --> 1:00:48.760
<v Speaker 1>for who are likely, based on past polling data and

1:00:48.800 --> 1:00:51.560
<v Speaker 1>past elections, to come out for Hillary, are young women,

1:00:52.480 --> 1:00:55.640
<v Speaker 1>women of color, a single lady. Married women who have

1:00:55.680 --> 1:00:59.040
<v Speaker 1>just written a book about unmarried women are perhaps one

1:00:59.040 --> 1:01:01.360
<v Speaker 1>of the more powerful vote blocks in the country, and

1:01:01.400 --> 1:01:05.960
<v Speaker 1>one of the biggest in they were of the electorate. Um.

1:01:06.040 --> 1:01:11.080
<v Speaker 1>They by many measures one Barack Obama reelection UM, and

1:01:11.120 --> 1:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>they are predicted in it's predicted that of women voters

1:01:16.360 --> 1:01:21.560
<v Speaker 1>more will be unmarried than married, and they vote very left.

1:01:21.760 --> 1:01:24.000
<v Speaker 1>They need a new compact with their government. They need

1:01:24.000 --> 1:01:26.520
<v Speaker 1>a new set of social policies. They need things like

1:01:26.640 --> 1:01:31.360
<v Speaker 1>paid leave, higher minimum wage, subsidized childcare, equal pay protections,

1:01:31.360 --> 1:01:35.000
<v Speaker 1>all kinds of things that Democrats are promising. Um. Single

1:01:35.000 --> 1:01:37.600
<v Speaker 1>women are likely to vote for Hillary Clinton, especially over

1:01:37.640 --> 1:01:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump, who's like a sexist ogre um, by a

1:01:40.840 --> 1:01:42.960
<v Speaker 1>huge margin, probably much larger than what we saw in

1:01:43.000 --> 1:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>twelve if I were to guess, UM. But married women

1:01:46.840 --> 1:01:50.120
<v Speaker 1>still tend to vote Republican by a smaller margin. Having

1:01:50.160 --> 1:01:53.680
<v Speaker 1>said that, has Donald Trump changed that he may There

1:01:53.720 --> 1:01:56.400
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of people who the female distaste for

1:01:56.440 --> 1:01:59.520
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump seems really high. UM. And it's hard to

1:01:59.560 --> 1:02:01.560
<v Speaker 1>know and how we actually see how until we get

1:02:01.560 --> 1:02:03.640
<v Speaker 1>more polling and until we see how people actually act

1:02:03.680 --> 1:02:06.320
<v Speaker 1>when they go into a voting booth. Um, because I

1:02:06.360 --> 1:02:11.040
<v Speaker 1>think there are some hardcore female Donald Trump supporters. She's

1:02:13.040 --> 1:02:16.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, they are angry about some of the same

1:02:16.080 --> 1:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>things his male supporters are angry about. And I think

1:02:19.080 --> 1:02:23.600
<v Speaker 1>that they're being underestimated. Yeah, I mean, I think that

1:02:23.640 --> 1:02:26.080
<v Speaker 1>they are being underestimated. I think they're going to be

1:02:26.160 --> 1:02:28.520
<v Speaker 1>very vocal, very loud, And yes, I do think. I

1:02:28.680 --> 1:02:30.600
<v Speaker 1>certainly think that there's going to be a big percentage

1:02:30.600 --> 1:02:33.160
<v Speaker 1>of women who vote for Donald Trump. I don't think

1:02:33.160 --> 1:02:36.959
<v Speaker 1>it probably is going to be as big um as

1:02:37.040 --> 1:02:39.800
<v Speaker 1>it might have been were it Marco Rubio or Jeb

1:02:39.800 --> 1:02:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Bush that Hillary Clinton was running against. Let's talk about

1:02:43.040 --> 1:02:45.880
<v Speaker 1>your time with Hillary Clinton on the trail and bring

1:02:45.920 --> 1:02:48.720
<v Speaker 1>it full circle. You spent a lot of time with

1:02:48.720 --> 1:02:50.959
<v Speaker 1>the Clinton campaign. You wrote a piece for New York

1:02:51.000 --> 1:02:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Magazine all about her. Tell us something about Hillary Clinton

1:02:54.480 --> 1:02:59.440
<v Speaker 1>that we don't know. Well, you know, the thing that

1:02:59.480 --> 1:03:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I will say, having spent time with her is something

1:03:01.280 --> 1:03:04.800
<v Speaker 1>that you probably you may not feel it, but you

1:03:04.880 --> 1:03:06.400
<v Speaker 1>may have also heard it from other people have spent

1:03:06.400 --> 1:03:08.800
<v Speaker 1>time with her. She's very funny, and she's immensely warm,

1:03:08.840 --> 1:03:12.240
<v Speaker 1>and she's quite relaxed. And I think that those things

1:03:12.760 --> 1:03:15.520
<v Speaker 1>are I just heard people putting on their brakes all

1:03:15.560 --> 1:03:20.680
<v Speaker 1>over America and going what Yes. I was really struck

1:03:20.680 --> 1:03:22.600
<v Speaker 1>by because for years, as somebody who had written about

1:03:22.640 --> 1:03:24.880
<v Speaker 1>Hillary and written and read everything that's ever been written

1:03:24.880 --> 1:03:27.320
<v Speaker 1>about her, um, I knew that there was this split

1:03:27.480 --> 1:03:30.480
<v Speaker 1>between how people who know her say she is, Oh,

1:03:30.520 --> 1:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>she's funny, she has a great sense of humor, she

1:03:32.280 --> 1:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>laughs all the time, she loves her friends, versus her

1:03:34.920 --> 1:03:39.840
<v Speaker 1>public perception, which is like cold, driving, ambitious, calculating, you know,

1:03:39.960 --> 1:03:44.120
<v Speaker 1>can't communicate with anybody. I knew that there was this dichotomy.

1:03:44.200 --> 1:03:46.600
<v Speaker 1>And then when I, you know, sort of got in

1:03:46.880 --> 1:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and got to spend time with her, sure enough, I

1:03:49.040 --> 1:03:51.000
<v Speaker 1>was like, wow, it really is true. But I think

1:03:51.040 --> 1:03:53.560
<v Speaker 1>the thing that surprised me so I was like, right,

1:03:53.600 --> 1:03:55.080
<v Speaker 1>she is funny, and she does laugh, and she has

1:03:55.080 --> 1:03:57.040
<v Speaker 1>a great sense of humor and clearly has a terrifically

1:03:57.040 --> 1:03:59.000
<v Speaker 1>warm relationship with the people who are who are in

1:03:59.040 --> 1:04:01.760
<v Speaker 1>her in her circle. The thing that I didn't know

1:04:03.080 --> 1:04:05.840
<v Speaker 1>was how calm she'd seen. The other thing is that

1:04:05.880 --> 1:04:07.880
<v Speaker 1>she was so good at the basics of campaigning. We

1:04:07.880 --> 1:04:09.480
<v Speaker 1>hear all the time about Hillary Clinton is not a

1:04:09.520 --> 1:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>natural candidate, and it's true She's not a natural orator,

1:04:12.240 --> 1:04:15.880
<v Speaker 1>but the sort of handshaking, remembering everybody's name, remembering a detail,

1:04:16.280 --> 1:04:18.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh I remember when we saw each other, however many

1:04:18.960 --> 1:04:21.760
<v Speaker 1>days ago, how's your kid doing, how's that? Kind of

1:04:21.760 --> 1:04:26.360
<v Speaker 1>glad handing retail politics. She was just absolutely smooth and capable,

1:04:26.480 --> 1:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>and it was like watching an Olympic athlete. That was

1:04:29.360 --> 1:04:32.320
<v Speaker 1>also surprising to me. There was nothing awkward or chilly

1:04:32.400 --> 1:04:34.840
<v Speaker 1>about her one on one or with the people that

1:04:34.880 --> 1:04:37.040
<v Speaker 1>she was talking to on the trail. Are they going

1:04:37.080 --> 1:04:40.720
<v Speaker 1>to unleash this? Hillary Clinton? Will she allow herself to

1:04:40.760 --> 1:04:43.480
<v Speaker 1>be unleash Like Aladdin comes out of that little lamp

1:04:43.520 --> 1:04:46.120
<v Speaker 1>and suddenly you're going to say, oh my gosh, she's

1:04:46.160 --> 1:04:48.160
<v Speaker 1>so much different than I thought. I think that they

1:04:48.200 --> 1:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>would like to unleash her, but I don't know if

1:04:50.240 --> 1:04:52.880
<v Speaker 1>it's possible on a large scale. I mean, this is

1:04:52.880 --> 1:04:55.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the challenges. All this stuff is in one

1:04:55.000 --> 1:04:57.560
<v Speaker 1>on one campaigning or in small groups. As soon as

1:04:57.560 --> 1:04:59.480
<v Speaker 1>you put her on a stage in front of a

1:04:59.520 --> 1:05:02.160
<v Speaker 1>large crowd, it becomes much more difficult. She's capable of it,

1:05:02.520 --> 1:05:05.800
<v Speaker 1>but it's a much more difficult project. They won't let

1:05:05.800 --> 1:05:10.320
<v Speaker 1>her talk to enough reporters to press. It's insane. Let

1:05:10.360 --> 1:05:12.440
<v Speaker 1>me talk to her, let me do an interview with her.

1:05:12.440 --> 1:05:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I've known her since nineteen two. I did her first

1:05:14.920 --> 1:05:20.800
<v Speaker 1>interview as first lady. I'm like, just let her be herself. Obviously,

1:05:20.800 --> 1:05:24.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to ask tough questions, duh. But I think

1:05:24.320 --> 1:05:26.840
<v Speaker 1>she needs to to show that side of her. And

1:05:26.840 --> 1:05:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I just don't understand why they're so reticent. I think

1:05:29.920 --> 1:05:31.760
<v Speaker 1>he has put her in a put her in a

1:05:31.880 --> 1:05:34.320
<v Speaker 1>venue where it will come out. I have. I have

1:05:34.400 --> 1:05:36.640
<v Speaker 1>had the same frustrations for many years. I mean it's

1:05:36.680 --> 1:05:38.000
<v Speaker 1>been many years that I've been asking to talk to

1:05:38.080 --> 1:05:39.840
<v Speaker 1>Hillary Clinton in one capass or another, and it took

1:05:39.840 --> 1:05:43.040
<v Speaker 1>a really long time. Um. I think she has an

1:05:43.080 --> 1:05:46.680
<v Speaker 1>antipathy toward the press, and I think, though I may

1:05:46.760 --> 1:05:49.040
<v Speaker 1>understand some of it, she's had. You know, she's had

1:05:49.040 --> 1:05:51.880
<v Speaker 1>a rough time of it. I always say I hate

1:05:51.920 --> 1:05:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the press, that I am one, But this is an

1:05:54.600 --> 1:05:56.960
<v Speaker 1>instance in which I think it would be good for

1:05:57.000 --> 1:05:58.920
<v Speaker 1>everybody if she could figure out a way to get

1:05:58.920 --> 1:06:00.880
<v Speaker 1>over it. And I don't. I don't see that happening.

1:06:01.120 --> 1:06:05.120
<v Speaker 1>And to bring it full circle, how does she are

1:06:05.200 --> 1:06:07.920
<v Speaker 1>white men of a certain age just a lost cause?

1:06:07.920 --> 1:06:10.840
<v Speaker 1>At this point, Well, there's certainly not a loss cause

1:06:10.880 --> 1:06:13.520
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the policies that she's putting forth. I mean,

1:06:13.560 --> 1:06:15.760
<v Speaker 1>one of the interesting things about the platform and the

1:06:15.760 --> 1:06:18.240
<v Speaker 1>way she's campaigning is that she's working hard for them,

1:06:18.280 --> 1:06:21.240
<v Speaker 1>and you know, college educated white men are actually breaking

1:06:21.280 --> 1:06:24.120
<v Speaker 1>for her. I'm talking about working classing class white men.

1:06:24.280 --> 1:06:27.280
<v Speaker 1>She's having a very hard time with UM, and there

1:06:27.280 --> 1:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>are all kinds of arguments about why that might be.

1:06:29.160 --> 1:06:31.760
<v Speaker 1>One of the interesting things about her campaign is that

1:06:31.840 --> 1:06:34.160
<v Speaker 1>while strategically, I think there is an argument that she

1:06:34.200 --> 1:06:36.800
<v Speaker 1>could sort of cut the losses on that because her base,

1:06:37.080 --> 1:06:41.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, of voters of color women that that strategically

1:06:41.000 --> 1:06:43.000
<v Speaker 1>the best move is to turn out the vote in

1:06:43.040 --> 1:06:47.280
<v Speaker 1>those areas, she is actually choosing to really work hard

1:06:47.400 --> 1:06:49.720
<v Speaker 1>for the for the working class white vote. I mean,

1:06:49.720 --> 1:06:51.800
<v Speaker 1>this is she picked Tim Kane, and there are there

1:06:51.800 --> 1:06:54.240
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of arguments for picking a running mate

1:06:54.240 --> 1:06:56.800
<v Speaker 1>who would be both more progressive and in many ways

1:06:56.840 --> 1:07:01.600
<v Speaker 1>appeal to other to other populations, to our constituencies. Um,

1:07:01.720 --> 1:07:04.640
<v Speaker 1>she picked the white guy, the southern white guy. UM.

1:07:04.640 --> 1:07:09.480
<v Speaker 1>Talking about raising the minimum wage, infrastructure jobs, green jobs, UM.

1:07:09.520 --> 1:07:12.480
<v Speaker 1>These are all economic issues that would have a profound

1:07:12.640 --> 1:07:15.840
<v Speaker 1>impact on America's white working class, whether or not she

1:07:15.920 --> 1:07:19.320
<v Speaker 1>wins their votes. It is true that she's proposing policy

1:07:20.240 --> 1:07:24.160
<v Speaker 1>that would hopefully be good for them, but Donald Trump

1:07:24.200 --> 1:07:28.240
<v Speaker 1>is tapping into a feeling, and those are two very

1:07:28.280 --> 1:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>different things. What about Bernie bros. You know, we hear

1:07:33.600 --> 1:07:37.920
<v Speaker 1>and young feminists or young women in general. Um, Madeline

1:07:37.920 --> 1:07:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Albright got into a lot of trouble when she said

1:07:40.560 --> 1:07:43.360
<v Speaker 1>her famous line, which I've often quoted, there's a special

1:07:43.400 --> 1:07:46.400
<v Speaker 1>place in hell for women who help don't help other women.

1:07:46.800 --> 1:07:49.480
<v Speaker 1>And I think young women felt that was a real affront,

1:07:49.600 --> 1:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>saying we're not going to vote for Hillary simply because

1:07:51.800 --> 1:07:54.400
<v Speaker 1>she is female. Do you think that they've come around?

1:07:54.560 --> 1:07:59.120
<v Speaker 1>And what about male supporters of Bernie Sanders under the

1:07:59.160 --> 1:08:01.560
<v Speaker 1>age of thirty, for example, Well, by this I haven't

1:08:01.600 --> 1:08:04.520
<v Speaker 1>seen the numbers post convention, but at this going into

1:08:04.560 --> 1:08:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the convention, more former Bernie supporters had said that they

1:08:08.520 --> 1:08:11.480
<v Speaker 1>were going to vote for Hillary Clinton than Hillary supporters

1:08:11.480 --> 1:08:13.000
<v Speaker 1>said they were going to vote for Barack Obama going

1:08:13.040 --> 1:08:15.840
<v Speaker 1>into the two thousand eight conventions. So I don't have

1:08:15.880 --> 1:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>a tremendous worry um that they're not going to come around.

1:08:19.560 --> 1:08:21.880
<v Speaker 1>What about women under the age of thirty. You know,

1:08:22.080 --> 1:08:25.160
<v Speaker 1>there there was this generational divide when it came to

1:08:25.240 --> 1:08:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Hillary Clinton, at least in the primaries. Uh, what are

1:08:29.720 --> 1:08:32.840
<v Speaker 1>you hearing from some of them? My impression is that

1:08:32.920 --> 1:08:36.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of young women are actually and I've heard

1:08:36.040 --> 1:08:38.639
<v Speaker 1>from a lot of them who are Bernie supporters, who

1:08:38.720 --> 1:08:40.479
<v Speaker 1>are going to vote for Hillary Clinton. I think young

1:08:40.479 --> 1:08:42.679
<v Speaker 1>women are going to move to Hillary Clinton fairly quickly.

1:08:42.720 --> 1:08:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I think many of them already have, and I think

1:08:44.240 --> 1:08:46.479
<v Speaker 1>some of them actually were excited. Many of many of

1:08:46.520 --> 1:08:49.720
<v Speaker 1>the Bernie supporting young women didn't hate Hillary Clinton. A

1:08:49.720 --> 1:08:51.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of people, and it's it's very natural for young

1:08:51.760 --> 1:08:54.479
<v Speaker 1>people to lean more left than older people. I mean,

1:08:54.479 --> 1:08:56.439
<v Speaker 1>that's and that's part of what was being presented by

1:08:56.439 --> 1:08:59.360
<v Speaker 1>the Bernie Hillary choice is that Bernie the perception was

1:08:59.400 --> 1:09:02.280
<v Speaker 1>that Bernie had left or politics more radical politics. And

1:09:02.320 --> 1:09:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I think it's very natural and healthy for young people

1:09:04.800 --> 1:09:08.160
<v Speaker 1>to prefer radical politics. It's likewise natural and healthy for

1:09:08.280 --> 1:09:10.960
<v Speaker 1>older people who have seen some of the sausage made

1:09:11.240 --> 1:09:16.240
<v Speaker 1>to have perhaps a more moderate take on on the approach.

1:09:16.280 --> 1:09:19.759
<v Speaker 1>And so I didn't find that generational divide a sign

1:09:19.800 --> 1:09:23.000
<v Speaker 1>of like feminisms imminent demise or anything. And I do

1:09:23.040 --> 1:09:26.920
<v Speaker 1>think that a vastly large percentage of all Bernie voters,

1:09:27.000 --> 1:09:32.280
<v Speaker 1>and especially young women, never felt intense antipathy towards Hillary.

1:09:32.320 --> 1:09:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Some of them did, some of them did, and some

1:09:34.000 --> 1:09:35.920
<v Speaker 1>of them may change their minds on that, or may

1:09:35.960 --> 1:09:39.200
<v Speaker 1>reluctantly vote for her, or may abstain. But and then

1:09:39.200 --> 1:09:41.439
<v Speaker 1>we'll see how they feel about her if she becomes

1:09:41.439 --> 1:09:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the president. You know, we'll see how everybody feels power

1:09:44.280 --> 1:09:47.360
<v Speaker 1>she becomes the president. UM. But I'm not worried that

1:09:47.439 --> 1:09:50.759
<v Speaker 1>young women as a population are going to stay away

1:09:50.760 --> 1:09:55.439
<v Speaker 1>from the polls um in November. I actually think that

1:09:56.840 --> 1:10:00.040
<v Speaker 1>many people who think they don't care, many people to

1:10:00.080 --> 1:10:03.639
<v Speaker 1>assume young women don't care about electing a woman president.

1:10:03.840 --> 1:10:07.400
<v Speaker 1>I believe they'll be surprised, this is my guests, by

1:10:07.400 --> 1:10:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the number of women who wind up turning out to

1:10:09.200 --> 1:10:12.679
<v Speaker 1>vote for her and feel pretty excited about it. Rebecca Trast,

1:10:12.840 --> 1:10:14.840
<v Speaker 1>it's so fun to talk to you. It was really

1:10:14.840 --> 1:10:19.120
<v Speaker 1>fun to be here. Thanks for having me. Thanks to

1:10:19.560 --> 1:10:23.479
<v Speaker 1>Gretta Cone and the right Reverend John Delor for producing

1:10:23.479 --> 1:10:27.160
<v Speaker 1>the show. Reverend, I wonder how many shows before you

1:10:27.160 --> 1:10:30.960
<v Speaker 1>stop doing that. Thanks to Mark Phillips for our theme

1:10:31.040 --> 1:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>music and Thank you for listening. If you want to

1:10:34.000 --> 1:10:36.400
<v Speaker 1>leave us a message, please do so. At let me

1:10:36.439 --> 1:10:41.160
<v Speaker 1>do this part nine to four, four six, three seven.

1:10:41.840 --> 1:10:46.000
<v Speaker 1>Please subscribe, rate and review the podcast. It helps other

1:10:46.080 --> 1:10:48.960
<v Speaker 1>listeners to find the show. And we'll talk to you

1:10:49.040 --> 1:10:59.599
<v Speaker 1>next time. Bye. We adjusted Katie's medicine this morning. It's

1:10:59.600 --> 1:11:05.040
<v Speaker 1>really the single. It is the single. It is you're

1:11:05.080 --> 1:11:11.280
<v Speaker 1>doing it like as Liza Vanelli. Where is that Todd

1:11:11.439 --> 1:11:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the New God? Okay, I'll stop. I'm gonna be reviewing

1:11:16.200 --> 1:11:17.479
<v Speaker 1>my contract right after this