WEBVTT - Sweep the Deer

0:00:00.320 --> 0:00:04.280
<v Speaker 1>This crowd rises to its me what Carlos slamming it?

0:00:04.360 --> 0:00:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Oh Carlo, left wing free ball perfect, darl then Hellift

0:00:10.480 --> 0:00:13.400
<v Speaker 1>lock the shot at the rim, pow in the left

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:16.720
<v Speaker 1>hand and of fowl. Welcome to Chase Doown podcast, part

0:00:16.720 --> 0:00:18.640
<v Speaker 1>of the Cave Media Family. I'm your host, Justin Browan.

0:00:18.800 --> 0:00:21.239
<v Speaker 1>The Chase Down is presented by Fubo, the official streaming

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:23.479
<v Speaker 1>partner of the Calves. Watch over three hundred and fifty

0:00:23.560 --> 0:00:26.480
<v Speaker 1>channels of live sports and TV, including Vanduel Sports Network

0:00:26.480 --> 0:00:29.560
<v Speaker 1>without cable. There's no cost and no commitment. Try for

0:00:29.680 --> 0:00:33.120
<v Speaker 1>free at foobotv dot com Slash Calves. The Cleveland Cavaliers

0:00:33.159 --> 0:00:37.160
<v Speaker 1>have won their fourteenth consecutive game with a comfortable win

0:00:37.240 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>over the Milwaukee Bucks. A good test for them, one

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:44.080
<v Speaker 1>of the few teams that they are still measuring themselves

0:00:44.159 --> 0:00:47.760
<v Speaker 1>up against, a potential second round matchup for them, and they.

0:00:47.720 --> 0:00:49.479
<v Speaker 2>Got the win in Milwaukee.

0:00:49.840 --> 0:00:53.199
<v Speaker 1>Joining me today to discuss that and the upcoming stretch

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:56.040
<v Speaker 1>is my co host Carter Rodriguez. Carter, how you doing, Buddy,

0:00:56.200 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm doing great. It is a really one of the

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:03.320
<v Speaker 1>first really lovely day of the burgeoning spring in Columbus, Ohio.

0:01:04.240 --> 0:01:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Kids were out without their coats on, playing with a

0:01:07.000 --> 0:01:11.120
<v Speaker 1>bubble machine going down the slide. It was absolutely wonderful.

0:01:11.600 --> 0:01:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm sipping on a Mystic Mama from Jackie O's I'm

0:01:16.080 --> 0:01:19.240
<v Speaker 1>in a great mood, and the Cavs certainly have done

0:01:19.280 --> 0:01:23.000
<v Speaker 1>nothing to hurt that fourteen wins in a row, and

0:01:23.240 --> 0:01:27.119
<v Speaker 1>it felt to me justin I don't know if the

0:01:27.160 --> 0:01:31.120
<v Speaker 1>matchup mattered as much as much as their approach to

0:01:31.200 --> 0:01:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the matchup mattered. You know, I think they've proven everything

0:01:35.800 --> 0:01:39.560
<v Speaker 1>they probably want to prove against the Bucks in the

0:01:39.560 --> 0:01:43.200
<v Speaker 1>first couple games of the year. But they you know,

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 1>we joked on our last podcast that admit it. You know,

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 1>a thirteen game win streak. Were they slumping a little?

0:01:51.040 --> 0:01:57.600
<v Speaker 1>And I felt like this game really was a demonstration

0:01:58.680 --> 0:02:01.240
<v Speaker 1>of what a focused Cavs team can do even when

0:02:01.280 --> 0:02:04.320
<v Speaker 1>they're not playing that well, because I thought they outplayed

0:02:04.320 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the Milwaukee Bucks for forty eight minutes last night. Do

0:02:08.000 --> 0:02:10.520
<v Speaker 1>you feel that they didn't play that well last night

0:02:10.600 --> 0:02:11.639
<v Speaker 1>or they didn't shoot that well?

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 2>But yeah, that's what I meant.

0:02:12.600 --> 0:02:15.919
<v Speaker 1>I meant even when things aren't firing on all cylinders,

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:20.800
<v Speaker 1>like their attention to detail and their their system and

0:02:20.840 --> 0:02:25.000
<v Speaker 1>their connectedness, all those things were going for them, and

0:02:25.440 --> 0:02:30.480
<v Speaker 1>even when they're not shooting particularly well, they're still just better.

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Like I thought, Jannis brought an a game and you know,

0:02:36.280 --> 0:02:39.760
<v Speaker 1>he probably had six dunks through two and a half quarters.

0:02:40.320 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 1>And I jumped on to the Fear of the Sword

0:02:42.360 --> 0:02:45.400
<v Speaker 1>playback a live stream just to kind of react to

0:02:45.440 --> 0:02:47.920
<v Speaker 1>the game in real time with Tony Pesta talking about,

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:50.240
<v Speaker 1>oh man, yeah, it's having a great game, and all

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 1>of a sudden, I look at the box scorers, like

0:02:52.280 --> 0:02:56.360
<v Speaker 1>twenty six points on twenty shots. Oh, it's not that good.

0:02:56.639 --> 0:03:00.280
<v Speaker 1>You know, like they really trusted their own process us

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:04.520
<v Speaker 1>in this game, and it made it. They just kind

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 1>of ground Milwaukee down to a dust until and then

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Jarrett kind of puts the puts the finishing touch with

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:17.960
<v Speaker 1>that poster on Brook Lopez and and it looks it's

0:03:18.040 --> 0:03:21.160
<v Speaker 1>just a walk away victory, even when Donovan goes four

0:03:21.160 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 1>to fifteen, Darius goes four to thirteen, combined two of

0:03:24.360 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>fifteen from three from those guys, and it just didn't

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:28.160
<v Speaker 1>really matter.

0:03:29.000 --> 0:03:29.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:03:29.320 --> 0:03:32.240
<v Speaker 1>It's really funny because when I reflect back on kind

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 1>of the four games that we've had against Milwaukee this season,

0:03:36.120 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 1>normally the formula when you play the bucks is, hey,

0:03:38.600 --> 0:03:41.840
<v Speaker 1>when Giannie has got it going, you want to play

0:03:41.840 --> 0:03:44.680
<v Speaker 1>that to a draw, right like you want to you know,

0:03:45.720 --> 0:03:47.720
<v Speaker 1>hang around and then when he goes to the bench,

0:03:47.800 --> 0:03:49.200
<v Speaker 1>you can make a little bit of a run and

0:03:49.240 --> 0:03:50.040
<v Speaker 1>you can pull.

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 2>Away at that time.

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it's fair to say that Jannis is the

0:03:53.720 --> 0:03:57.400
<v Speaker 1>best player in the Eastern Conference. Like when I look

0:03:57.520 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of at the best players on the best team

0:04:00.120 --> 0:04:03.840
<v Speaker 1>throughout the East or even across the league, that like

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 1>Tier one group of like yokicch Shay, Jannie Lebron, Luca,

0:04:10.520 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 1>like that group, there's really only one of them in

0:04:13.480 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the Eastern Conference where just definitively if you go into

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:21.800
<v Speaker 1>a series, that's the number one guy. Jason Tatum, Jlen Brown,

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:26.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, Jalen Brunson, all those guys. If we're in

0:04:26.120 --> 0:04:29.159
<v Speaker 1>a series against them, there is a chance that someone

0:04:29.160 --> 0:04:30.880
<v Speaker 1>on the Caves is the best player in that series.

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>I think Giannis is one of those guys that he's

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:35.320
<v Speaker 1>just going to be that best player no matter what,

0:04:35.960 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 1>and for the Cavs to win the yannest minutes in

0:04:38.720 --> 0:04:41.440
<v Speaker 1>every single one of these matchups, or at least it

0:04:41.440 --> 0:04:43.000
<v Speaker 1>feels like that. I know that was the case for

0:04:43.040 --> 0:04:45.960
<v Speaker 1>the first two and then he didn't play the third.

0:04:47.000 --> 0:04:49.960
<v Speaker 1>But in everything they did, they definitely won the minutes

0:04:50.240 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 1>with Giannis in the third matchup where he didn't play, Yeah, yeah,

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:57.279
<v Speaker 1>we did terrific there in those minutes. But you know,

0:04:57.360 --> 0:05:01.040
<v Speaker 1>to outscore the Bucks by thirteen in honest's minutes again,

0:05:01.120 --> 0:05:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Like that's really really encouraging because he is tough to handle.

0:05:05.520 --> 0:05:08.039
<v Speaker 1>He's going to get his own he's going to test

0:05:08.080 --> 0:05:12.240
<v Speaker 1>your defense, and I don't think every team is built

0:05:12.320 --> 0:05:15.240
<v Speaker 1>to handle what Yannis is capable of doing offensively, the

0:05:15.279 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 1>way that he plays with so much force, going to

0:05:17.440 --> 0:05:20.760
<v Speaker 1>the basket with such relentlessness, the way that he's able

0:05:20.800 --> 0:05:24.040
<v Speaker 1>to get his own rebound and second chance opportunities, and

0:05:24.080 --> 0:05:26.400
<v Speaker 1>the Cavs have bodies to throw at him, right, Like

0:05:26.520 --> 0:05:28.840
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Hunter can do a good job. Dean Wade does

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:32.039
<v Speaker 1>a good job. Max Deane has always done a good job.

0:05:32.080 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 1>And I thought he really battled in this game because

0:05:35.640 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>normally he does a good job of kind of baiting

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 1>Giannis into his worst habits, and Giannis was not having it,

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:44.360
<v Speaker 1>Like he was going through his chest as much as

0:05:44.360 --> 0:05:46.600
<v Speaker 1>he could. And you know, when you're Dean Wade and

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:49.599
<v Speaker 1>you just don't have the physical advantages there. You just

0:05:49.640 --> 0:05:51.240
<v Speaker 1>got to hang on pe to your life and hope

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:54.799
<v Speaker 1>the help comes. I thought he did. He didn't change.

0:05:54.880 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, again at the beginning I said it was

0:05:57.200 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>really steadfast the game plan from the cab. I think

0:06:00.680 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 1>that was really emblematic in the way Dean was guarding.

0:06:03.360 --> 0:06:05.239
<v Speaker 1>You know, He's like, I'm just going to do my best.

0:06:05.520 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to go crazy. I'm not going to

0:06:07.520 --> 0:06:09.560
<v Speaker 1>reach I'm not going to try to I'm not going

0:06:09.640 --> 0:06:12.320
<v Speaker 1>to change what I'm doing. I'm just going to trust

0:06:12.400 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>that eventually it's going to take him one more bump

0:06:15.920 --> 0:06:17.839
<v Speaker 1>to get through me than he wants, and we're going

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 1>to be able to bring help and we're going to

0:06:20.120 --> 0:06:21.120
<v Speaker 1>get the stops we need.

0:06:21.560 --> 0:06:22.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Yeah.

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 1>And you know, on the other end, while the Cats

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:27.520
<v Speaker 1>held up well defensively and did a great job on

0:06:27.600 --> 0:06:31.120
<v Speaker 1>you honest, the Bucks really struggled with the cast, particularly

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:33.040
<v Speaker 1>on the perimeter. You know, when when you look at

0:06:33.040 --> 0:06:35.599
<v Speaker 1>this matchup on paper, you would think that is the

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:38.360
<v Speaker 1>way that this should go, right, Damian Lillard is going

0:06:38.400 --> 0:06:40.920
<v Speaker 1>to be a target on defense, not a target in

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:44.159
<v Speaker 1>the way that you know, Boston will target Darius or Donovan,

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:46.680
<v Speaker 1>were like, hey, we can shoot over these shorter guys.

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 1>You can get by name, Like you're he's going to

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:53.200
<v Speaker 1>allow very easy penetration. It's not shooting over you're getting

0:06:53.240 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>by him. Gary Trent Junior I thought had a tough game.

0:06:56.560 --> 0:06:58.440
<v Speaker 1>There were times that he was a little bit pesky

0:06:58.480 --> 0:07:01.000
<v Speaker 1>and physical, but he's one of those guys that's going

0:07:01.000 --> 0:07:03.840
<v Speaker 1>to gamble a little bit too much and create opportunities.

0:07:04.279 --> 0:07:06.240
<v Speaker 1>And so they prints at the two just as not

0:07:06.360 --> 0:07:09.760
<v Speaker 1>also do not. It's just not enough foot speed. Yeah,

0:07:09.760 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>for this Cavs team, they really are lacking foot speed.

0:07:13.200 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 1>And when you look at the shot quality for the

0:07:16.240 --> 0:07:19.360
<v Speaker 1>Calves in this game, it was staggering. Like they got

0:07:19.440 --> 0:07:22.960
<v Speaker 1>a lot of open threes. They took twenty three wide

0:07:22.960 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>open threes without a defender within six feet. They went

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 1>ten of twenty three on those, so good but not

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:31.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, great, not one of their best shooting nights.

0:07:31.400 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 1>But then they also went seven of twenty on kind

0:07:33.800 --> 0:07:36.480
<v Speaker 1>of those late contest threes where a defender is within

0:07:36.560 --> 0:07:39.520
<v Speaker 1>four to six feet, so not wide open, but you're

0:07:39.520 --> 0:07:42.440
<v Speaker 1>getting a clean look in those spots. And they felt

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:45.400
<v Speaker 1>and they felt rhythm. You know, that's where the tracking

0:07:45.480 --> 0:07:48.480
<v Speaker 1>data can show you is are they lightly contested pull

0:07:48.560 --> 0:07:52.600
<v Speaker 1>ups or are they lightly contested swing? Swing swing in

0:07:52.680 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the rhythm of the game. You know, ball, you know,

0:07:55.880 --> 0:07:59.160
<v Speaker 1>hitting the shooter's pocket and able to rise up like

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 1>that stuff.

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:00.560
<v Speaker 2>I felt like.

0:08:01.000 --> 0:08:03.760
<v Speaker 1>I felt like even when Milwaukee was contesting, it was

0:08:03.760 --> 0:08:06.320
<v Speaker 1>one of some of those contests where it was like, yeah,

0:08:06.360 --> 0:08:10.239
<v Speaker 1>but they're probably you know, they're not really impacting the shot. Yeah,

0:08:10.320 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 1>it's forty three shots that a defender was at least

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 1>four feet away from the three point line, Like that

0:08:16.960 --> 0:08:19.960
<v Speaker 1>is an incredibly great shot quality. I thought the ball

0:08:20.040 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 1>was moving really well. And going back to what you

0:08:22.360 --> 0:08:24.600
<v Speaker 1>said at the start of the podcast, it really did

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:29.480
<v Speaker 1>feel validating. It was a comforting win because they've struggled recently, right, Like,

0:08:29.520 --> 0:08:33.680
<v Speaker 1>they've had close games against lesser teams and you're never sure,

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:35.800
<v Speaker 1>right because there are the ebbs and flows of a

0:08:35.840 --> 0:08:38.440
<v Speaker 1>season of are they in a rut and you know

0:08:38.520 --> 0:08:40.319
<v Speaker 1>this is something that they have to work their way

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:42.560
<v Speaker 1>out of, or is this a little bit of human

0:08:42.640 --> 0:08:45.320
<v Speaker 1>nature of hey, we're not really playing for anything at

0:08:45.320 --> 0:08:48.360
<v Speaker 1>this point. We are eight games up on the Boston Celtics. Well,

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:52.840
<v Speaker 1>we're like, what we're really competing against is Cavalier's history.

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Can we get the win record, can we get you know,

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the number one seed in the NBA Finals and keep

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:02.120
<v Speaker 1>pace with the Okay? See, but you know, if you're

0:09:02.160 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 1>playing a shorthanded Chicago Bulls or the Charlotte Hornets, you're

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 1>not going to be able to get up for those

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:10.320
<v Speaker 1>games in the same way that you would for a

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:13.480
<v Speaker 1>matchup against Boston. But you also can't take for granted

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the fact that, hey, we can just turn this on

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:18.720
<v Speaker 1>when we need to, especially with basketball being such a

0:09:18.800 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 1>rhythm game. And even though they didn't have their best

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:24.880
<v Speaker 1>shooting night, I felt that the intensity was there throughout

0:09:24.880 --> 0:09:27.719
<v Speaker 1>the entire night. I thought the ball movement was spectacular.

0:09:28.000 --> 0:09:31.160
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was a really really fun team effort.

0:09:31.800 --> 0:09:34.640
<v Speaker 1>And the thing that I really enjoy about it is,

0:09:34.720 --> 0:09:37.200
<v Speaker 1>you know the kind of old adage that role players

0:09:37.200 --> 0:09:39.480
<v Speaker 1>play well at home, they don't necessarily play well on

0:09:39.520 --> 0:09:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the road. This was one of those games where the

0:09:41.880 --> 0:09:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Cavs depth and the role guys really stepped up.

0:09:45.640 --> 0:09:45.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:09:45.920 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean you just look at the bench scoring. You know,

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Wade has nine, Hunter has a bad game and has

0:09:51.520 --> 0:09:56.320
<v Speaker 1>six bros five tied Jerome chips and nine, Merrill Chips

0:09:56.360 --> 0:09:58.440
<v Speaker 1>and nine, and then you look at the Bucks bench

0:09:58.480 --> 0:10:03.079
<v Speaker 1>and you know, it's really nothing. Gary trans Junior scored five,

0:10:04.480 --> 0:10:08.439
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Porter scored two, and that was really it. And

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:11.440
<v Speaker 1>in the you know, in the competitive portion of the game,

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:16.640
<v Speaker 1>the depth that the Calves can play is just, you know,

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 1>so overwhelming, and they I think Danny Cunningham said it

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 1>best on his podcast un Lockdown Calves, where he goes

0:10:25.600 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I felt like this was like closer to a Caves

0:10:27.559 --> 0:10:32.120
<v Speaker 1>thirty point win than it was to a Bucks win. Yeah,

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:35.280
<v Speaker 1>they just looked like they were on a different level

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:38.599
<v Speaker 1>that they could absorb a Yannis a game because the

0:10:38.679 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 1>honest is also guarding pretty well. It's just, you know,

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:44.200
<v Speaker 1>they just didn't have the personnel. Like I think there's

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:47.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, you look at like the Bucks in a

0:10:47.559 --> 0:10:51.480
<v Speaker 1>matchup against the Celtics or something. I feel like their

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:55.640
<v Speaker 1>positional size could help them a little bit. You know,

0:10:55.640 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 1>they could be okay, but they just don't get the

0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:04.320
<v Speaker 1>foot speed for these guards and the Calves machine as well.

0:11:04.360 --> 0:11:06.840
<v Speaker 1>It's not just the guards speed with the ball, it's

0:11:07.160 --> 0:11:10.480
<v Speaker 1>them getting into the paint, getting in rotation and the

0:11:10.520 --> 0:11:12.679
<v Speaker 1>ball just moves so well for this Caves team that

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:17.840
<v Speaker 1>it's just you're just so far behind. Yeah, And I

0:11:17.880 --> 0:11:20.719
<v Speaker 1>think one of the toughest things for Calves opponents is,

0:11:21.160 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 1>especially when you look at Milwaukee, it's okay when Dame

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:27.160
<v Speaker 1>and Giannis are out there, they have a fighting chance

0:11:27.360 --> 0:11:30.080
<v Speaker 1>at playing the Calves to a draw, right like, they're

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:33.680
<v Speaker 1>able to, you know, maybe hang around. If Dame gets

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:36.679
<v Speaker 1>hot or you know, gets a few enough trips to

0:11:36.720 --> 0:11:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the free throw line, they can maybe play that to

0:11:38.840 --> 0:11:42.440
<v Speaker 1>a draw. Whereas with the Calves, it's okay, our starting

0:11:42.440 --> 0:11:45.800
<v Speaker 1>lineup is very good. Now you know, Donovan and Mobili

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:48.760
<v Speaker 1>are going to the bench, you have to deal with

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Alan and Garland with a bunch of very productive role

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 1>players that are going to play well. Then Donovan and

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:58.480
<v Speaker 1>Mobili are going to come in refreshed, ready to go.

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:00.520
<v Speaker 1>Then we're going to come back and going to hit

0:12:00.559 --> 0:12:03.000
<v Speaker 1>you with that closing lineup right like. It reminds me

0:12:03.040 --> 0:12:05.520
<v Speaker 1>of the Omniman meme of look what they have to

0:12:05.559 --> 0:12:07.480
<v Speaker 1>do to mimic a fraction of our power.

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:09.160
<v Speaker 2>You have to have Dame and.

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 1>The honest out there playing forty eight minutes if you

0:12:12.240 --> 0:12:14.360
<v Speaker 1>want to be as good as we are as a collective,

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and when you have a night where at least eight

0:12:17.080 --> 0:12:20.880
<v Speaker 1>players have nine points for the Cavs, you know, and

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 1>your best bench scorer in DeAndre Hunter as a little

0:12:24.440 --> 0:12:26.600
<v Speaker 1>bit of an off game, but eight players with at

0:12:26.679 --> 0:12:29.720
<v Speaker 1>least nine points, ten players with at least fifteen minutes,

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:34.080
<v Speaker 1>five guys coming in off the bench kind of in

0:12:34.080 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 1>that fifteen to twenty minute range.

0:12:35.880 --> 0:12:36.560
<v Speaker 2>Like, that's a.

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Lot of depth, that's a lot of production, and it

0:12:39.200 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 1>just it really helps them put their best foot forward.

0:12:42.040 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>And I think it's going to be an interesting conundrum

0:12:44.280 --> 0:12:47.080
<v Speaker 1>for Kenny Atkinson of how he's going to pair this

0:12:47.200 --> 0:12:50.240
<v Speaker 1>down in the playoffs if at all. Here's the thing, man,

0:12:50.400 --> 0:12:54.160
<v Speaker 1>I just think, like, I don't think it's actually that

0:12:54.320 --> 0:12:58.640
<v Speaker 1>hard because while the depth of options is great, I

0:12:58.800 --> 0:13:02.280
<v Speaker 1>still do think number one strength is at the top

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 1>in the core liability in that shell. And then I

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 1>just think he's gonna play who's playing the best. You know,

0:13:08.840 --> 0:13:12.640
<v Speaker 1>it's just gonna be a form thing. You know, on

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:15.320
<v Speaker 1>a night where DeAndre Hunter just doesn't have it, he

0:13:15.400 --> 0:13:20.320
<v Speaker 1>only plays nineteen minutes and that's fine on you know,

0:13:20.360 --> 0:13:22.560
<v Speaker 1>in Okoro, who I honestly think could have used a

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:27.240
<v Speaker 1>lot more run than he got. Needed was going to

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:30.280
<v Speaker 1>pick up a lot of those minutes. Like, I just

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:34.360
<v Speaker 1>feel like they have so many options, dude, I'm just

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 1>so grateful over this season. Man, They've won fourteen games

0:13:37.040 --> 0:13:40.120
<v Speaker 1>in a row and lose that game to Boston to

0:13:40.240 --> 0:13:45.440
<v Speaker 1>go to forty and ten, and they respond by ripping

0:13:45.480 --> 0:13:50.840
<v Speaker 1>off fourteen straight wins. Dude, Like, and I just kind

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:53.960
<v Speaker 1>of who told you that there was a winning streak

0:13:53.960 --> 0:13:57.520
<v Speaker 1>around the corner. You're good, pal, justin You're never wrong.

0:13:57.559 --> 0:14:01.840
<v Speaker 1>You're just late, buddy, I'm just early. Sorry, never late,

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:06.520
<v Speaker 1>never late. You've never been late on a Cav's optimistic, right, Yeah,

0:14:07.120 --> 0:14:09.240
<v Speaker 1>if I've never been the last one to the table,

0:14:09.559 --> 0:14:12.360
<v Speaker 1>that's concerning. That would be very concerning. People need to

0:14:12.400 --> 0:14:15.920
<v Speaker 1>do a wellness check on me at that point. But

0:14:16.240 --> 0:14:18.200
<v Speaker 1>you're right, man, Like the death is a strength. But

0:14:18.320 --> 0:14:22.760
<v Speaker 1>to me, like, the interesting conundrum is, right now you're

0:14:22.800 --> 0:14:25.320
<v Speaker 1>able to go ten to eleven deep and figure out

0:14:25.360 --> 0:14:27.160
<v Speaker 1>who the hot hand is among the bench.

0:14:27.280 --> 0:14:28.120
<v Speaker 2>Right in the.

0:14:28.080 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Playoffs, you might not have that option, right, Like, you

0:14:30.560 --> 0:14:32.920
<v Speaker 1>can go up with a really strong eight or nine,

0:14:33.480 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 1>but you know you almost have to get some first

0:14:37.480 --> 0:14:39.800
<v Speaker 1>half run. You might have to go ten in the

0:14:39.840 --> 0:14:42.200
<v Speaker 1>first half, and then in the second half you're like,

0:14:42.200 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 1>all right, these are my eight that I'm playing the

0:14:44.560 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 1>last twenty four with, right, So you rather can I

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:51.840
<v Speaker 1>say that a little bit? Or you start your series

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:55.480
<v Speaker 1>that way and then by game five you know who

0:14:55.520 --> 0:14:59.680
<v Speaker 1>can't play, you know, or who isn't fitting or isn't

0:14:59.680 --> 0:15:05.160
<v Speaker 1>giving the run. I just think that's because the series

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:08.640
<v Speaker 1>is a small sample. But it's like one of those

0:15:08.680 --> 0:15:10.280
<v Speaker 1>things where you have to kind of throw out a

0:15:10.280 --> 0:15:13.400
<v Speaker 1>sample size and just be like, what's working, what's not?

0:15:14.040 --> 0:15:18.480
<v Speaker 1>And if through four games into a series, one lineup

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 1>is just getting run off the court, I do think

0:15:21.760 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 1>you got to adjust.

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:24.520
<v Speaker 2>I do too.

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:28.680
<v Speaker 1>My question for you, and where it like some clarification

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 1>is do you think because you said you're going to

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:33.760
<v Speaker 1>figure out who can and can't play in the series,

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 1>do you think there's actually anybody that's currently within the

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 1>rotation that just like from a matchup standpoint, can't play

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:43.360
<v Speaker 1>in a particular matchup or I think going to be

0:15:43.400 --> 0:15:45.680
<v Speaker 1>performance based where like you know, they're in a little

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:47.480
<v Speaker 1>in their heads, they're not playing at the level that

0:15:47.520 --> 0:15:50.840
<v Speaker 1>they can, rather than some deficiency they have within their game.

0:15:51.160 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I don't think it's I don't think that's an important

0:15:53.840 --> 0:15:57.080
<v Speaker 1>distinction to make when you're coaching in a playoff series.

0:15:57.200 --> 0:16:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I think it is like when it's the latter, it's Hey,

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:04.480
<v Speaker 1>from the start, we know that this is going to

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:07.160
<v Speaker 1>be a bad matchup, Like if George Nang was still

0:16:07.160 --> 0:16:09.120
<v Speaker 1>on the roster, you would know that, Hey, Boston's going

0:16:09.200 --> 0:16:10.640
<v Speaker 1>to be a tough matchup for him, or okay, so

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 1>he's going to be a tough matchup. When you had

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Channing Fry, you knew, Hey, I can't really play him

0:16:14.520 --> 0:16:18.880
<v Speaker 1>against the Warriors. That's different than you know, giving Isaacle

0:16:18.920 --> 0:16:21.800
<v Speaker 1>corel run. And if he's turning down shots and he's

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:24.400
<v Speaker 1>not playing confidently on the offensive end, hey, it's a

0:16:24.400 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 1>little tough for us to get him out there, even

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:28.520
<v Speaker 1>though we value what he's doing defensively. I think that

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:31.920
<v Speaker 1>that distinction does matter. It matters for team building, but

0:16:31.960 --> 0:16:35.160
<v Speaker 1>not for Kenny Atkinson. That would be my argument is, Okay,

0:16:35.400 --> 0:16:41.000
<v Speaker 1>whether it's an archetype problem or a confidence problem, eventually

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:43.120
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna have a guy who's just it's not their series.

0:16:44.000 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 1>I agree, and it's I think you need to in

0:16:48.080 --> 0:16:52.120
<v Speaker 1>that tie, especially under duress, like if you're in the

0:16:52.120 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 1>first round and you're you're up, you know, three to one.

0:16:54.800 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, maybe you don't need to make that change.

0:16:57.120 --> 0:16:59.840
<v Speaker 1>But if you're like on the ropes, yeah, if it's

0:17:00.280 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 1>five and two to two or game six and you're

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:06.720
<v Speaker 1>down three to two or something like that, Like that's

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:11.280
<v Speaker 1>where it's like, I don't care what it is, We're

0:17:11.359 --> 0:17:13.800
<v Speaker 1>just not gonna We can't afford to let you work

0:17:13.840 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 1>through this right now, whether it's a if you just

0:17:17.119 --> 0:17:20.160
<v Speaker 1>hit that shot, you know, because here's the thing. Channing

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:24.400
<v Speaker 1>had opportunities in those Warriors series. You know, he got

0:17:24.520 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 1>chances to play and got run and had shots, and

0:17:28.440 --> 0:17:31.399
<v Speaker 1>if he had hit those shots then he would have

0:17:31.440 --> 0:17:35.720
<v Speaker 1>played more, you know, like it was a hard matchup

0:17:35.760 --> 0:17:38.879
<v Speaker 1>for him. But there were good switchy teams that Channing

0:17:38.920 --> 0:17:44.359
<v Speaker 1>played well against for US. But like ty Lu didn't

0:17:44.359 --> 0:17:47.920
<v Speaker 1>have the luxury of being like, well, let's just give

0:17:47.920 --> 0:17:50.720
<v Speaker 1>it a couple more games. It's like, no, we're losing.

0:17:51.000 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 1>We gotta we gotta make changes now. And like, I

0:17:53.840 --> 0:17:57.080
<v Speaker 1>do think the playoffs voist that on you. So that

0:17:57.240 --> 0:18:00.359
<v Speaker 1>is why I don't think the distinction matters. Do I

0:18:00.400 --> 0:18:04.879
<v Speaker 1>think I think every player on this roster could help

0:18:05.240 --> 0:18:09.960
<v Speaker 1>in every matchup. Okay, so were to be very clear,

0:18:10.400 --> 0:18:14.080
<v Speaker 1>but but the chance of a of a team just

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 1>being like, hey, we're going to blow up every Sam

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Merril off ball action.

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:21.200
<v Speaker 2>It's the playoffs.

0:18:21.240 --> 0:18:23.280
<v Speaker 1>We're going to beat the crap out of him off

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:25.320
<v Speaker 1>ball and it's just not and they're not going to

0:18:25.359 --> 0:18:28.919
<v Speaker 1>call fouls for Sam or something like that. Like and

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>if those minutes aren't going well, then I would expect

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:34.320
<v Speaker 1>him to go out of the rotation. Same thing with Isaac,

0:18:34.400 --> 0:18:37.760
<v Speaker 1>same thing with Dean. I mean there are and there's

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>levels to this, right, Like the top five guys aren't

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:42.879
<v Speaker 1>going to get cut out. You know they're going to

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 1>go down with a ship with those guys. But like

0:18:47.119 --> 0:18:50.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, with your seven, eight, nine, ten in the rotation,

0:18:50.960 --> 0:18:54.199
<v Speaker 1>those are those fungible minutes that you might just have

0:18:54.320 --> 0:18:58.320
<v Speaker 1>to swap out and see what changes under duress. Okay,

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:00.800
<v Speaker 1>I think we're actually on the same where it's like

0:19:00.920 --> 0:19:05.280
<v Speaker 1>game one and two. Yeah, yeah, yeah, I think game

0:19:05.320 --> 0:19:06.960
<v Speaker 1>one and two. You know, first half you play a

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:09.800
<v Speaker 1>deeper rotation, see who has it, see who doesn't, see

0:19:09.920 --> 0:19:12.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of what you feel out the matchup, right, Like

0:19:12.560 --> 0:19:14.639
<v Speaker 1>those first two games of a series are always a

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:17.000
<v Speaker 1>little bit of a feeling out process, and then you

0:19:17.040 --> 0:19:20.080
<v Speaker 1>can make those assessments, right, like, hey, we probably can't

0:19:20.119 --> 0:19:23.199
<v Speaker 1>keep playing Ricky Rubio in this series. We have options here, right,

0:19:23.280 --> 0:19:26.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think if you would have asked me a

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:28.920
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks ago, I probably would have sat here

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:30.879
<v Speaker 1>being like, you know, I don't know if Sam can

0:19:30.880 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 1>play against Boston. I think we have enough depth. I

0:19:33.760 --> 0:19:35.959
<v Speaker 1>think we can kind of make that assessment going in.

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:39.440
<v Speaker 1>But with the way he's been playing, like especially now

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:41.840
<v Speaker 1>that the shots falling, like you know, he's doing the

0:19:41.840 --> 0:19:44.480
<v Speaker 1>main thing he's been holding up defensively. I thought, you know,

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:47.280
<v Speaker 1>when he got put on Dame of a couple times

0:19:47.359 --> 0:19:49.040
<v Speaker 1>last night, I was like, eh, that's a little too

0:19:49.080 --> 0:19:51.199
<v Speaker 1>much dip on that ship. He killed Boston the other

0:19:51.400 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 1>or Boston Milwaukee on the other end of the floor, so.

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:54.440
<v Speaker 2>You know he did.

0:19:54.600 --> 0:19:56.760
<v Speaker 1>But you know, you don't have to put him on

0:19:56.840 --> 0:19:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Dame right, like you can put him on someone else.

0:19:58.920 --> 0:20:01.439
<v Speaker 1>But my point is, I think he's done a good

0:20:01.560 --> 0:20:04.439
<v Speaker 1>enough job as an all around player to merit, you know,

0:20:04.520 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 1>that opportunity to see what he's got. So I do agree.

0:20:08.359 --> 0:20:10.720
<v Speaker 1>I think as the series progresses, you're going to become

0:20:10.720 --> 0:20:13.040
<v Speaker 1>more selective with your lineups. You're going to see which

0:20:13.040 --> 0:20:17.640
<v Speaker 1>ones end up working. But to start the series, I

0:20:17.640 --> 0:20:19.679
<v Speaker 1>think you almost have to go ten at least in

0:20:19.720 --> 0:20:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the first half, and then in the second half it's

0:20:21.680 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 1>all right, this is our eight that we're running with.

0:20:24.320 --> 0:20:26.800
<v Speaker 1>In the second half, we're going to you know, we're

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:29.720
<v Speaker 1>going to give you know. What the advantage of that is, too,

0:20:29.880 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 1>is you're giving your core guys and your starters a

0:20:32.880 --> 0:20:35.399
<v Speaker 1>little bit more rest in the first half so that

0:20:35.440 --> 0:20:37.159
<v Speaker 1>they can go harder in the second half so that

0:20:37.200 --> 0:20:39.480
<v Speaker 1>they can close games. You're not playing back to backs

0:20:39.520 --> 0:20:41.680
<v Speaker 1>in the playoffs, you're not playing three and four nights

0:20:41.680 --> 0:20:44.960
<v Speaker 1>with travel. You have the opportunity to do that. So

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I think going a little deeper, not only to assess

0:20:47.880 --> 0:20:50.199
<v Speaker 1>what lineups are working and what kind of looks that

0:20:51.119 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 1>you feel good about a relative to the opponent that's

0:20:54.760 --> 0:20:57.720
<v Speaker 1>putting them in the tough spot, you have that ability

0:20:57.720 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 1>to then play your guys a little tougher in the

0:20:59.800 --> 0:21:01.959
<v Speaker 1>set and half when you want to close out those games.

0:21:02.200 --> 0:21:04.560
<v Speaker 1>And I do think that does reflect the sea change,

0:21:04.600 --> 0:21:07.040
<v Speaker 1>at least for me in terms of what I would

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:10.640
<v Speaker 1>do if I were Kenny, because if I'm being honest

0:21:10.720 --> 0:21:15.479
<v Speaker 1>with myself. I was looking forward towards the playoffs and

0:21:15.520 --> 0:21:18.639
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking, it's going to annoy me if Kenny

0:21:18.680 --> 0:21:21.879
<v Speaker 1>tries to run ten guys. M I was thinking, I

0:21:21.960 --> 0:21:24.840
<v Speaker 1>was like, he'll I was expecting him to, and I

0:21:24.920 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 1>wasn't going to be excited about it. I was going

0:21:26.640 --> 0:21:28.920
<v Speaker 1>to be like, I'd just rather you pick the nine

0:21:29.200 --> 0:21:33.000
<v Speaker 1>and you know, and really and really pare it down,

0:21:33.400 --> 0:21:35.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, again we want a title with TYLERU. So

0:21:36.119 --> 0:21:40.360
<v Speaker 1>like there's some muscle memory here of you know, pairing

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:44.120
<v Speaker 1>down and being cool with that. Yeah, But I think

0:21:44.160 --> 0:21:49.080
<v Speaker 1>that's the change is I now am of the opinion

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:51.399
<v Speaker 1>that playing those ten, at least in the first half,

0:21:52.160 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 1>is so representative of what the team's culture is and

0:21:57.280 --> 0:22:00.800
<v Speaker 1>of what of how they play and how Kenny five

0:22:00.920 --> 0:22:03.879
<v Speaker 1>figures out who to play over the rest of the

0:22:03.960 --> 0:22:08.160
<v Speaker 1>game that I am now I'm now going in aligned

0:22:08.240 --> 0:22:10.600
<v Speaker 1>with that idea that he'll play ten. Now he might

0:22:10.720 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 1>surprise us in play nine. I mean, we don't know.

0:22:13.760 --> 0:22:17.520
<v Speaker 1>We're doing as we're guessing and we're doing prognostication. But

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 1>again I went and expecting to be like, h I

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:23.320
<v Speaker 1>wish he wouldn't. And now I'm like, yeah, it's cool

0:22:23.359 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 1>if he does.

0:22:24.200 --> 0:22:24.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:22:24.720 --> 0:22:26.360
<v Speaker 1>And I think a big part of that is now

0:22:26.720 --> 0:22:29.159
<v Speaker 1>we have an extended track record of all these guys

0:22:29.160 --> 0:22:32.120
<v Speaker 1>coming in off the bench and providing something. Right, everyone's

0:22:32.160 --> 0:22:35.159
<v Speaker 1>won us a game. They've all bring something different to

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:37.439
<v Speaker 1>the table, right. I think that's a big part of this.

0:22:37.560 --> 0:22:41.199
<v Speaker 1>It's not like there's big redundancies between what a lot

0:22:41.240 --> 0:22:43.040
<v Speaker 1>of them are bringing, right, Like, they all bring a

0:22:43.040 --> 0:22:46.160
<v Speaker 1>different flavor. They're bringing a track record of success within

0:22:46.200 --> 0:22:48.720
<v Speaker 1>the season, and when you have that track record of success,

0:22:48.720 --> 0:22:50.800
<v Speaker 1>you feel more comfortable with it, just like I feel

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:53.359
<v Speaker 1>more comfortable with zoo Mai Companion because only you can

0:22:53.400 --> 0:22:55.920
<v Speaker 1>do your best work harder, zoo Mai Companion can help

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:59.399
<v Speaker 1>you do the rest, like automatically taking notes, answering meeting questions,

0:22:59.400 --> 0:23:02.520
<v Speaker 1>and helping you. Barnier Coworker available at no additional costs

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:07.200
<v Speaker 1>with eligible paid plans, were happy with Zuomi Companion hard Man,

0:23:07.400 --> 0:23:08.000
<v Speaker 1>What a year?

0:23:08.320 --> 0:23:09.119
<v Speaker 2>What a year?

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:11.680
<v Speaker 1>I know, I'm sure they got to win one more game.

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:13.880
<v Speaker 1>They got to win one more game to match your

0:23:13.920 --> 0:23:16.520
<v Speaker 1>prediction for this season. They got to win two more

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:20.960
<v Speaker 1>for them to match mine. I think they're hitting those marks. Yeah,

0:23:21.000 --> 0:23:25.439
<v Speaker 1>and normally picking, Hey, a win total like seven higher

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 1>than the Vegas line is like all right, Homer.

0:23:29.640 --> 0:23:32.080
<v Speaker 2>Like you know that Vegas line was nonsense.

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Though even the national guys are like, I don't know

0:23:34.320 --> 0:23:39.760
<v Speaker 1>about the Calvs, but that line looks stupid, Like, yeah,

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 1>it was awful. You made the best point. Everything went

0:23:43.119 --> 0:23:46.720
<v Speaker 1>wrong last year and they exceeded that total. There was

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 1>no reason to I think people got maybe a little

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:51.960
<v Speaker 1>too worked up over the changes some other teams in

0:23:52.000 --> 0:23:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the Eastern Conference made right, like we always sit here

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:57.879
<v Speaker 1>in the off season being like oh Man Tias Jones

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:00.120
<v Speaker 1>going to the Phoenix Suns, They're going to win seventy.

0:24:00.160 --> 0:24:02.919
<v Speaker 1>But then you know, the offseason moves ended up not

0:24:03.040 --> 0:24:06.400
<v Speaker 1>mattering as much as they do in that transaction cycle.

0:24:06.840 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I think maybe the cast standing pat

0:24:10.520 --> 0:24:13.120
<v Speaker 1>led this sum doubt there, but they have far exceeded

0:24:13.160 --> 0:24:16.080
<v Speaker 1>those expectations. And you know that I think that ties

0:24:16.119 --> 0:24:18.879
<v Speaker 1>into the depth. Like looking at last night, it was

0:24:18.920 --> 0:24:22.200
<v Speaker 1>really really cool to see so eight lineups played or sorry,

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:25.240
<v Speaker 1>three lineups played at least eight minutes last night. The

0:24:25.280 --> 0:24:28.719
<v Speaker 1>starting lineup basically played Milwaukee to a draw twenty four

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:30.680
<v Speaker 1>to twenty six. They just got outscored by two in

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:34.679
<v Speaker 1>ten minutes. You had the Jerome Mitchell, Merrill, Hunter and

0:24:34.720 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Mobiley lineup that played eight minutes that played Milwaukee to

0:24:37.800 --> 0:24:39.959
<v Speaker 1>a draw twenty two, twenty two. And then you had

0:24:39.960 --> 0:24:42.960
<v Speaker 1>the lineup that was the most productive last night, Garland

0:24:42.960 --> 0:24:46.640
<v Speaker 1>o'coro Struce Way to Allen, which in eight minutes outscored

0:24:46.680 --> 0:24:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Milwaukee by eleven twenty five to fourteen. You know, that

0:24:50.520 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 1>really was the biggest kind of differential on the night.

0:24:54.359 --> 0:24:57.160
<v Speaker 1>And you know, it was so cool about the Garland

0:24:57.160 --> 0:25:01.080
<v Speaker 1>o'coro Streuceway to Allen lineup. To me was like there's

0:25:01.119 --> 0:25:04.159
<v Speaker 1>so many ogs in there, you know, there is like

0:25:04.359 --> 0:25:09.240
<v Speaker 1>that felt like, I don't know, it's funny. I think

0:25:09.359 --> 0:25:12.919
<v Speaker 1>it was Chris fiedor or maybe it was Joe Varden

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:15.480
<v Speaker 1>on the Athletic they talk about like what a wacky

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:18.240
<v Speaker 1>lineup that was, and I was like, that was what

0:25:18.280 --> 0:25:21.280
<v Speaker 1>they ran. That was their team like two years ago

0:25:21.840 --> 0:25:25.000
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of minutes. So it was just like

0:25:25.119 --> 0:25:27.639
<v Speaker 1>kind of funny to see them and like those are

0:25:27.680 --> 0:25:29.720
<v Speaker 1>guys who have just been on this team. You know,

0:25:29.920 --> 0:25:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Strus obviously in year two, but it feels like an

0:25:33.080 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 1>older I know, but Garland's year five of Coros four. No,

0:25:39.800 --> 0:25:42.720
<v Speaker 1>maybe Garland's six, I don't remember. Either way, those guys

0:25:42.760 --> 0:25:46.159
<v Speaker 1>have just been here since this They a lot of

0:25:46.200 --> 0:25:48.720
<v Speaker 1>those guys got here when this team wasn't good yet,

0:25:49.000 --> 0:25:52.600
<v Speaker 1>and it's really really cool to see them out there,

0:25:53.040 --> 0:25:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Like it almost felt like like kind of like a

0:25:55.560 --> 0:25:58.239
<v Speaker 1>comfort thing, like I was watching an old movie I've

0:25:58.280 --> 0:26:02.159
<v Speaker 1>seen a hundred times and watching Kevin dwer Junr was

0:26:02.160 --> 0:26:04.560
<v Speaker 1>on the floor for the Bucks last night, and what

0:26:04.880 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 1>three four of those guys were on the same team

0:26:06.960 --> 0:26:10.240
<v Speaker 1>as him at one point, So it just yet it

0:26:10.320 --> 0:26:12.760
<v Speaker 1>felt like, you know, cuddling up to watch your favorite

0:26:12.800 --> 0:26:15.040
<v Speaker 1>movie you've seen a hundred times, which is why it's

0:26:15.080 --> 0:26:17.160
<v Speaker 1>funny that you know, you saw a few people talk about,

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:20.359
<v Speaker 1>oh that that lineup one. I'm like that those guys

0:26:20.920 --> 0:26:23.679
<v Speaker 1>together have won the GAVs a lot of games and

0:26:23.760 --> 0:26:27.800
<v Speaker 1>are really crucial in this renaissance, and you know they're

0:26:27.840 --> 0:26:31.560
<v Speaker 1>not getting to this level without those, especially those four guys.

0:26:31.600 --> 0:26:33.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously Stews has been amazing, just hasn't been

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:36.879
<v Speaker 1>here quite as long. And yeah, those minutes just felt

0:26:36.920 --> 0:26:40.040
<v Speaker 1>really really fun. And I mean how many times are

0:26:40.000 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 1>were we're like, oh if only we can get Okoro

0:26:42.440 --> 0:26:44.359
<v Speaker 1>and weighed on the floor with one of the bigs.

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:47.399
<v Speaker 1>No one's going to score on us because you know,

0:26:47.440 --> 0:26:49.399
<v Speaker 1>we've just wanted them all to be healthy and in

0:26:49.520 --> 0:26:52.160
<v Speaker 1>form at the same time. Kind of feels like we're

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:54.679
<v Speaker 1>getting that right now. Yeah, and you know that is

0:26:54.720 --> 0:26:57.639
<v Speaker 1>a really good defensive lineup, right, Like DG's been working

0:26:57.640 --> 0:26:59.400
<v Speaker 1>his butt off defensively. I thought he had a great

0:26:59.400 --> 0:27:03.160
<v Speaker 1>defensive game against Milwaukee, really really felt his presence there.

0:27:04.119 --> 0:27:07.959
<v Speaker 1>Of course, what Acoro does kind of goes without speaking. Max,

0:27:08.200 --> 0:27:10.359
<v Speaker 1>I'm on record, you know, he's one of my favorite

0:27:10.400 --> 0:27:14.080
<v Speaker 1>role players, maybe my favorite role player that I've had

0:27:14.440 --> 0:27:16.960
<v Speaker 1>watching the Cavs. I just love his energy and what

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:19.720
<v Speaker 1>he brings to the table. He was great, wads terrific

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:22.680
<v Speaker 1>against Gianness and Jared. Obviously we know what he does

0:27:22.680 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 1>on the defensive end, so it's no surprise that that

0:27:26.000 --> 0:27:29.359
<v Speaker 1>lineup really stepped up. And you know a Korro in particular,

0:27:29.480 --> 0:27:31.960
<v Speaker 1>what he's done to Damian Lillard. He's guarded Dame more

0:27:32.000 --> 0:27:34.880
<v Speaker 1>than any other player the last two years. He spent

0:27:35.000 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 1>forty minutes over forty minutes guarding Dame the last two seasons,

0:27:38.760 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 1>and in that time Dame is seven to twenty one

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:43.960
<v Speaker 1>from the field. And while that percentage, you know, we're

0:27:44.000 --> 0:27:46.560
<v Speaker 1>talking about a small sample size here, twenty one shots,

0:27:46.880 --> 0:27:49.840
<v Speaker 1>the percentage is terrific that you know, that indicates he's

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:52.800
<v Speaker 1>playing really good defense. I think the more significant thing

0:27:52.880 --> 0:27:56.720
<v Speaker 1>is twenty one shots in forty minutes for a very

0:27:56.840 --> 0:27:59.120
<v Speaker 1>high volume player that's able to get a shot off

0:27:59.160 --> 0:28:02.280
<v Speaker 1>against a lot of guys. That goes to you know,

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:06.320
<v Speaker 1>a coorro's ability to suppress shots, to make guys uncomfortable,

0:28:06.320 --> 0:28:08.960
<v Speaker 1>to get him out of his spots. He does a

0:28:09.040 --> 0:28:12.720
<v Speaker 1>terrific job on Damian Lillard. And you know, I'd be

0:28:12.800 --> 0:28:15.560
<v Speaker 1>very embarrassed if I was a podcaster that recently said

0:28:15.560 --> 0:28:18.600
<v Speaker 1>Calves have no one that can guard Dame, I would

0:28:18.600 --> 0:28:21.119
<v Speaker 1>be too, And thank god, that wouldn't be our podcast.

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:25.920
<v Speaker 1>I particularly if that same podcast or recently or after

0:28:25.960 --> 0:28:29.920
<v Speaker 1>the Okac loss said that our insanity run is over,

0:28:30.119 --> 0:28:32.560
<v Speaker 1>that would be really really embarrassing. As the Calves are

0:28:32.560 --> 0:28:35.640
<v Speaker 1>on the verge of another fifteen game winning streak, certainly

0:28:35.680 --> 0:28:39.760
<v Speaker 1>again could not be this podcast. I just think Okoro

0:28:39.960 --> 0:28:42.480
<v Speaker 1>is one of those guys that you're really really glad

0:28:42.720 --> 0:28:46.680
<v Speaker 1>that the Calves have hung on too, because in one

0:28:46.680 --> 0:28:48.440
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons why I think both of us were

0:28:48.480 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 1>angsty about losing him in the off season or doing

0:28:51.280 --> 0:28:53.840
<v Speaker 1>a sign and trade even for a good player back

0:28:54.600 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 1>as his name is bounced around the transactional circles, is

0:28:58.920 --> 0:29:00.720
<v Speaker 1>he does do a thing no one else in the

0:29:00.760 --> 0:29:04.000
<v Speaker 1>team does as well as him. Yeah, I would rather

0:29:04.080 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 1>have him on Dame Lillard than anyone else in this roster.

0:29:07.960 --> 0:29:12.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, Mobley is a better defender overall, obviously, you know,

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:15.720
<v Speaker 1>I would probably put Alan above Oquaro as well, but

0:29:16.440 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 1>for this one chore, this one task, putting him on

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:24.160
<v Speaker 1>a six foot six y one guard, Yeah, it's so nice,

0:29:24.240 --> 0:29:26.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, And I feel like in a Knick series,

0:29:26.600 --> 0:29:30.720
<v Speaker 1>it'll matter. In in a in a Bucks series, it'll matter,

0:29:31.240 --> 0:29:33.440
<v Speaker 1>you know. I don't know if Boston is the perfect

0:29:33.480 --> 0:29:36.440
<v Speaker 1>series for Ice. That's that's the funny thing, because Drew

0:29:36.480 --> 0:29:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Holiday and Derek White, like Derek White is the Calves killer,

0:29:40.040 --> 0:29:42.760
<v Speaker 1>but you know, not in the way that Ice, right,

0:29:42.960 --> 0:29:46.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not you know, solo isolation. Let's put him on

0:29:46.480 --> 0:29:48.800
<v Speaker 1>and try to you know, shut off the flow of

0:29:48.800 --> 0:29:51.760
<v Speaker 1>the offense. Usually, like Derek White is almost a barometer

0:29:51.840 --> 0:29:54.560
<v Speaker 1>of how you know, when their offense is rolling, the

0:29:54.840 --> 0:29:57.160
<v Speaker 1>ball is swinging getting to Derek White, and he's and

0:29:57.200 --> 0:30:00.360
<v Speaker 1>he's hitting kind of those knockout punches rather than he's

0:30:00.440 --> 0:30:02.240
<v Speaker 1>going to be the guy that's running the offense. No,

0:30:02.400 --> 0:30:05.320
<v Speaker 1>their offense runs through all right, let's find a mispatch

0:30:05.320 --> 0:30:07.960
<v Speaker 1>and play isolation basketball. Yeah, And that's where it just

0:30:08.400 --> 0:30:10.520
<v Speaker 1>unless you just don't give up the switch, which, by

0:30:10.520 --> 0:30:12.800
<v Speaker 1>the way, Okorra was part of them not doing that

0:30:13.200 --> 0:30:15.560
<v Speaker 1>against Boston. So I'm not saying it's not a good matchup,

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:18.800
<v Speaker 1>but those the Knicks and the Bucks specifically are just

0:30:18.840 --> 0:30:23.520
<v Speaker 1>like the perfect Even if he's not starting, you can

0:30:23.840 --> 0:30:26.800
<v Speaker 1>you can just kind of muck up their rhythm for

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:31.200
<v Speaker 1>a bit and and you know, maybe turn a game

0:30:31.720 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 1>in a five minute stretch. So I feel like Ice

0:30:35.600 --> 0:30:38.280
<v Speaker 1>is really, really in good form. And I don't know

0:30:38.280 --> 0:30:40.720
<v Speaker 1>if I've hit on this on the pod. I can't remember, honestly,

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:43.360
<v Speaker 1>so you'll just have to hold me accountable here. But

0:30:44.400 --> 0:30:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I feel like I have to hold an ol a

0:30:46.920 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 1>little bit with Ice because we talked about it on

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:53.400
<v Speaker 1>the pod in the summer, we talked about it last year,

0:30:53.480 --> 0:30:56.040
<v Speaker 1>where you know, we've kind of always been at odds

0:30:56.040 --> 0:31:01.480
<v Speaker 1>on this where you've always said, hey, man, like, parking

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:05.640
<v Speaker 1>him in the corner isn't going to get what you

0:31:05.760 --> 0:31:10.400
<v Speaker 1>need out of him structurally. And I always said, well,

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:12.560
<v Speaker 1>he's got to do more with the times he does

0:31:12.600 --> 0:31:14.840
<v Speaker 1>get the ball if he wants to get the ball

0:31:14.880 --> 0:31:19.160
<v Speaker 1>more and get to do more like because involving a

0:31:19.160 --> 0:31:22.720
<v Speaker 1>player in an action is an inherently costly thing, you know,

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:25.400
<v Speaker 1>it's a resource thing. If Isaac is the one setting

0:31:25.400 --> 0:31:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the screen, then Evan or Jared is not the one

0:31:27.960 --> 0:31:29.440
<v Speaker 1>setting the screen, you know.

0:31:29.960 --> 0:31:30.520
<v Speaker 2>So that's all.

0:31:30.720 --> 0:31:33.560
<v Speaker 1>That was kind of my party line was like, hey, Isaac,

0:31:33.680 --> 0:31:35.920
<v Speaker 1>I love Isaac. He's a great player. He's hit and hit,

0:31:36.000 --> 0:31:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the jumpers come along, all this stuff. I want to

0:31:39.040 --> 0:31:44.560
<v Speaker 1>see him earn all the touches and in more activity

0:31:44.560 --> 0:31:47.360
<v Speaker 1>in the offense because the way the Cops were playing

0:31:47.480 --> 0:31:50.440
<v Speaker 1>last year, you need someone in that corner.

0:31:50.920 --> 0:31:51.120
<v Speaker 2>Yep.

0:31:52.080 --> 0:31:54.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think I just have to hold the LP

0:31:55.040 --> 0:32:00.200
<v Speaker 1>because Kenny has gotten Isaac a lot more involved. I mean,

0:32:00.200 --> 0:32:02.960
<v Speaker 1>he has been so good on the short roll all year.

0:32:03.760 --> 0:32:07.680
<v Speaker 1>He's been a very good off ball screener, really making

0:32:07.720 --> 0:32:11.400
<v Speaker 1>good contact, dragging that foot in just the sneaky little

0:32:11.440 --> 0:32:14.720
<v Speaker 1>way so you don't get called to get a little

0:32:14.760 --> 0:32:18.719
<v Speaker 1>bit more of a chip on the guy trying to recover.

0:32:19.920 --> 0:32:22.440
<v Speaker 1>I just think he's been a much more complete player.

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:26.720
<v Speaker 1>And to your point that you've made a billion times,

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:28.760
<v Speaker 1>you're just not as reliant on the three to go

0:32:28.800 --> 0:32:29.920
<v Speaker 1>in for him to have a good game.

0:32:29.960 --> 0:32:30.160
<v Speaker 2>Now.

0:32:30.760 --> 0:32:33.720
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, when you're sitting there and it's hey, you're

0:32:33.720 --> 0:32:36.200
<v Speaker 1>going to get three shots from the corner all game,

0:32:36.360 --> 0:32:40.000
<v Speaker 1>and your offensive output is going to be reliant on

0:32:40.040 --> 0:32:42.440
<v Speaker 1>how you do on those, Like that's such a low volume.

0:32:42.560 --> 0:32:45.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, Darius and Donovan, we'll go oh for three

0:32:45.160 --> 0:32:47.959
<v Speaker 1>at times, right, And the largest sample is he's been

0:32:48.000 --> 0:32:51.400
<v Speaker 1>shooting well. But I like seeing him used in more ways.

0:32:51.400 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 1>And I think, you know, we should probably acknowledge that

0:32:54.720 --> 0:32:57.520
<v Speaker 1>there was a foundation for this late in the past too, right,

0:32:57.600 --> 0:33:00.320
<v Speaker 1>Like this is something that we would occasionally see. Remember

0:33:00.360 --> 0:33:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the game against Miami last year where o'coro was the

0:33:03.120 --> 0:33:06.520
<v Speaker 1>role man was instrumental late in the fourth quarter of

0:33:06.600 --> 0:33:09.960
<v Speaker 1>getting great looks and getting those wins. But I think

0:33:10.240 --> 0:33:14.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of the kind of crisis situation that they were

0:33:14.120 --> 0:33:17.680
<v Speaker 1>in from a health perspective last year, it was tougher

0:33:17.720 --> 0:33:21.360
<v Speaker 1>to you know, let's explore some things with o'coro. Let's

0:33:21.400 --> 0:33:23.840
<v Speaker 1>let him, you know, stretch his wings here, let's you know,

0:33:24.120 --> 0:33:26.920
<v Speaker 1>experiment with other guys on the roster. The focus was

0:33:27.040 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 1>let's get Darius back on the right track. Let's Evan's

0:33:29.720 --> 0:33:32.200
<v Speaker 1>coming in back off a knee surgery. Let's try to

0:33:32.200 --> 0:33:35.920
<v Speaker 1>get him reintegrated. Oh yeah, we went eighteen and two

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and now we're missing Donovan for the rest of the

0:33:38.000 --> 0:33:41.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, the regular season, like there is always some

0:33:41.440 --> 0:33:44.000
<v Speaker 1>sort of issue going on and made it tougher. And

0:33:44.200 --> 0:33:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the other things that's made this

0:33:47.120 --> 0:33:50.920
<v Speaker 1>easier for Ocoro coming back is since he's come back

0:33:50.960 --> 0:33:53.720
<v Speaker 1>from the injury. Now DeAndre Hunter's on the roster, that

0:33:53.840 --> 0:33:57.320
<v Speaker 1>means he's able to play almost exclusively as a shooting guard.

0:33:57.760 --> 0:34:00.320
<v Speaker 1>And I think that guard to guards, screening and the

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:04.600
<v Speaker 1>ways that Kenny's using him are so much easier as

0:34:04.640 --> 0:34:06.840
<v Speaker 1>a shooting guard. That was the spot that you know,

0:34:06.960 --> 0:34:11.760
<v Speaker 1>Bruce Brown really excelled as I'm basically like functioning sometimes

0:34:11.840 --> 0:34:15.000
<v Speaker 1>as a power forward at the shooting guard position and

0:34:16.080 --> 0:34:18.200
<v Speaker 1>he has more gravity as a result of that. I

0:34:18.239 --> 0:34:22.399
<v Speaker 1>saw the openness ratings for three point shooters so far

0:34:22.480 --> 0:34:25.680
<v Speaker 1>this season. Dean Wade actually has a higher openness rating

0:34:25.680 --> 0:34:28.600
<v Speaker 1>than isacle Coro. Oh that's a great stat that's a

0:34:28.640 --> 0:34:32.239
<v Speaker 1>great pull, brother, And I think a large part of that,

0:34:32.800 --> 0:34:34.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, him shooting better is part of it, but

0:34:34.960 --> 0:34:37.239
<v Speaker 1>I think part of it is when you're playing as

0:34:37.239 --> 0:34:39.920
<v Speaker 1>a shooting guard, the defender has to stay connected.

0:34:39.960 --> 0:34:40.839
<v Speaker 2>You're not going to.

0:34:40.800 --> 0:34:44.319
<v Speaker 1>Sag off as a shooting guard defender and oh, I'm

0:34:44.320 --> 0:34:46.680
<v Speaker 1>going to fill the paint. I'm feeling the paint here

0:34:46.719 --> 0:34:47.319
<v Speaker 1>on the weak side.

0:34:47.360 --> 0:34:48.160
<v Speaker 2>No, what are you doing.

0:34:48.200 --> 0:34:50.719
<v Speaker 1>You're not bringing anything to the table there. As a

0:34:50.760 --> 0:34:53.520
<v Speaker 1>small forward or you know, even a power forward, you're

0:34:53.560 --> 0:34:55.520
<v Speaker 1>able to kind of change defensively.

0:34:55.560 --> 0:34:56.480
<v Speaker 2>And let's put.

0:34:56.719 --> 0:34:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Al Horford on isaacle Coro in the corner because he

0:34:59.400 --> 0:35:02.040
<v Speaker 1>can sag often too the paint. You're not able to

0:35:02.080 --> 0:35:04.920
<v Speaker 1>do that at the shooting guard position. And I just

0:35:04.960 --> 0:35:07.600
<v Speaker 1>feel like he is playing since he's come back with

0:35:07.640 --> 0:35:11.759
<v Speaker 1>the injury. He's hit the ground running, he is attacking

0:35:11.800 --> 0:35:14.840
<v Speaker 1>the glass, he's getting rebounds, he's doing the act of stuff.

0:35:15.360 --> 0:35:19.399
<v Speaker 1>It's both what I wanted to see and it's also

0:35:19.480 --> 0:35:23.960
<v Speaker 1>producing the kind of supplemental production that you really wanted

0:35:23.960 --> 0:35:26.960
<v Speaker 1>to see to continue justify giving him those minutes, Yeah,

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:29.840
<v Speaker 1>for sure, and Brandon and the YouTube chat just also

0:35:29.960 --> 0:35:32.360
<v Speaker 1>just made a little extra comment that you know, Okoro

0:35:32.480 --> 0:35:35.840
<v Speaker 1>in action does make the Dames and the Bronsons and

0:35:35.880 --> 0:35:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the tray Youngs of the world have to guard for

0:35:39.000 --> 0:35:43.799
<v Speaker 1>twenty four seconds. Yep, there's just all these knock on

0:35:43.840 --> 0:35:47.360
<v Speaker 1>effects that make his life a little bit easier. And

0:35:47.840 --> 0:35:49.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, and that is the one thing I will

0:35:49.800 --> 0:35:53.200
<v Speaker 1>press on Kenny a little bit is I don't think

0:35:53.640 --> 0:35:59.240
<v Speaker 1>against Milwaukee Ocoro should be playing basically twelve competitive minutes.

0:36:00.000 --> 0:36:02.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that's a twenty minute a game matchup. And

0:36:03.320 --> 0:36:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I would take minutes from the DeAndre Hunters, the Isaac

0:36:07.120 --> 0:36:09.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, the Dean Wades, the Sam Merrill's of the

0:36:09.960 --> 0:36:14.640
<v Speaker 1>world to find ice those minutes because I think he

0:36:14.760 --> 0:36:20.200
<v Speaker 1>is so singularly impactful against the most volatile element of

0:36:20.239 --> 0:36:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks attack.

0:36:22.080 --> 0:36:23.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, yeah, I agree.

0:36:23.920 --> 0:36:27.960
<v Speaker 1>And you know, credit to Chris Fedor's Wanting Gold Talk podcast,

0:36:28.040 --> 0:36:30.959
<v Speaker 1>but he was mentioning a couple of games ago where

0:36:31.040 --> 0:36:33.840
<v Speaker 1>Kenny was saying he was basically looking down at the

0:36:33.840 --> 0:36:36.400
<v Speaker 1>stat sheet and said, man, I gotta find ways to

0:36:36.400 --> 0:36:39.640
<v Speaker 1>get Isaac more minutes and basically saying, hey, you know,

0:36:39.719 --> 0:36:42.560
<v Speaker 1>we close with DeAndre here, but I just as easily

0:36:42.600 --> 0:36:44.400
<v Speaker 1>could have had Isaac in that role right like what

0:36:44.760 --> 0:36:46.960
<v Speaker 1>he brings to the table defensively, and you know, I

0:36:47.200 --> 0:36:50.560
<v Speaker 1>do think there's differences in terms of their length, but

0:36:50.760 --> 0:36:53.200
<v Speaker 1>that's you know, that's one of those tricky conundrums because

0:36:53.400 --> 0:36:56.560
<v Speaker 1>I typically would agree with you. But I think one

0:36:56.560 --> 0:36:59.680
<v Speaker 1>of the kind of trickle down effects that we're dealing

0:36:59.680 --> 0:37:02.719
<v Speaker 1>with now when you're looking at it from a rotation standpoint,

0:37:02.760 --> 0:37:06.200
<v Speaker 1>is if this was a month or two ago where

0:37:06.239 --> 0:37:09.400
<v Speaker 1>Merrill's playing good defensively but the shots not falling, Okay,

0:37:09.600 --> 0:37:13.200
<v Speaker 1>that's an easier kind of transition to make now that

0:37:13.200 --> 0:37:16.719
<v Speaker 1>the shots falling and he's playing well balanced basketball. You

0:37:17.080 --> 0:37:19.520
<v Speaker 1>when you have a team this deep, it needs to

0:37:19.560 --> 0:37:22.680
<v Speaker 1>be merit based. And I think that Kenny is doing

0:37:22.719 --> 0:37:26.520
<v Speaker 1>the right things here. And I understand how different shooting

0:37:26.560 --> 0:37:28.440
<v Speaker 1>the crap out of the ball. I didn't realize how

0:37:28.440 --> 0:37:31.319
<v Speaker 1>good It's been three of seven, three of five, one

0:37:31.320 --> 0:37:33.560
<v Speaker 1>of two, four of four, three of five in the

0:37:33.560 --> 0:37:37.120
<v Speaker 1>month of March. And you're not losing anything with him

0:37:37.200 --> 0:37:40.160
<v Speaker 1>on the court, right Like, he stands up defensively, his

0:37:40.239 --> 0:37:44.879
<v Speaker 1>screen navigation, his footwork is terrific. There Basically the only

0:37:44.920 --> 0:37:48.520
<v Speaker 1>spot when you look at like Basketball Index is a

0:37:48.560 --> 0:37:50.400
<v Speaker 1>great resource for this kind of thing where it breaks

0:37:50.400 --> 0:37:53.640
<v Speaker 1>down the different defenses. The only spot where he's going

0:37:53.680 --> 0:37:56.560
<v Speaker 1>to have issues is in isolation. I think they rate

0:37:56.640 --> 0:37:59.080
<v Speaker 1>him at it like a great amount of C minus there.

0:37:59.320 --> 0:38:03.160
<v Speaker 1>But every he's doing his part, he's playing good team defense.

0:38:03.200 --> 0:38:07.680
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's great that Isaac is playing so

0:38:07.760 --> 0:38:11.399
<v Speaker 1>well and we're having these conversations because the other thing

0:38:11.440 --> 0:38:14.320
<v Speaker 1>that we've talked about, just reflecting on, you know, years

0:38:14.360 --> 0:38:18.239
<v Speaker 1>of Isaacle coorl conversations is hey, you know, when he

0:38:18.360 --> 0:38:20.399
<v Speaker 1>starts off the year and he's in a reduced role,

0:38:20.840 --> 0:38:23.200
<v Speaker 1>you don't feel his impact, You don't notice him out there.

0:38:23.200 --> 0:38:25.560
<v Speaker 1>And it's yeah, it's great that when he steps in

0:38:25.600 --> 0:38:28.399
<v Speaker 1>as a starter he plays really really well, but can

0:38:28.440 --> 0:38:30.880
<v Speaker 1>we get this in a reduced role, can he play

0:38:31.120 --> 0:38:34.799
<v Speaker 1>an impactful fifteen to eighteen minutes? And I think what

0:38:34.800 --> 0:38:37.399
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing is he came back from the injury and

0:38:37.600 --> 0:38:42.040
<v Speaker 1>immediately was doing that. That to me speaks to a

0:38:42.160 --> 0:38:44.480
<v Speaker 1>confidence in his role. And I think credit needs to

0:38:44.480 --> 0:38:47.839
<v Speaker 1>go to the coaching staff of really defining exactly what

0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:49.840
<v Speaker 1>they want from him when he's out there on the court.

0:38:50.640 --> 0:38:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Very very fair justin we got to talk about Max.

0:38:54.000 --> 0:38:56.719
<v Speaker 1>It's a disservice that we took this long to get

0:38:56.760 --> 0:39:03.600
<v Speaker 1>to Max, who killed mel in this game, absolutely killed them.

0:39:05.000 --> 0:39:09.279
<v Speaker 1>He was moving, he was really attacking the boards. He

0:39:09.360 --> 0:39:15.480
<v Speaker 1>had four offensive rebounds seventeen and nine. Everything about his

0:39:15.640 --> 0:39:19.000
<v Speaker 1>game last night was reflective of what I love about

0:39:19.080 --> 0:39:22.879
<v Speaker 1>him as a role player. He read space, He had

0:39:23.000 --> 0:39:26.719
<v Speaker 1>only two assists. He had a few unbelievable reads that

0:39:26.800 --> 0:39:30.879
<v Speaker 1>did not lead to buckets. I think he is You know,

0:39:31.440 --> 0:39:34.399
<v Speaker 1>that starting group has come under fire the last week

0:39:34.520 --> 0:39:37.520
<v Speaker 1>or so just because they haven't been starting particularly well,

0:39:37.960 --> 0:39:40.800
<v Speaker 1>even either half. Really the lineup usn't been playing that well.

0:39:41.000 --> 0:39:45.879
<v Speaker 1>If we're really being honest with ourselves, Max has been

0:39:45.920 --> 0:39:52.160
<v Speaker 1>playing very good basketball. And I just you know, even

0:39:52.200 --> 0:39:55.440
<v Speaker 1>in that Orlando series last year where he couldn't hit

0:39:55.440 --> 0:39:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the broadside of a barn, no one could, but I

0:39:59.440 --> 0:40:01.719
<v Speaker 1>loved his then too. I just think he is a

0:40:01.760 --> 0:40:05.800
<v Speaker 1>winning player, and all the things I loved about him

0:40:06.000 --> 0:40:10.239
<v Speaker 1>as a free agent signing I still love. I just

0:40:10.320 --> 0:40:13.880
<v Speaker 1>think he adds an edge to this team. He adds

0:40:13.920 --> 0:40:17.520
<v Speaker 1>a professionalist professionalism to this team. I think he is

0:40:17.640 --> 0:40:21.399
<v Speaker 1>part of the whirling dervish of movement that they can

0:40:21.480 --> 0:40:24.279
<v Speaker 1>kind of provide and put teams in that blender. I

0:40:24.400 --> 0:40:28.000
<v Speaker 1>just I am so appreciative of his place on this roster.

0:40:28.400 --> 0:40:30.920
<v Speaker 1>And I feel like with all the fun of the

0:40:30.960 --> 0:40:34.960
<v Speaker 1>core four and then the Ty Jerome renaissance and the

0:40:35.360 --> 0:40:41.600
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Hunter mid season acquisition, I feel like sometimes he

0:40:41.680 --> 0:40:46.239
<v Speaker 1>is kind of the underdiscussed player on this roster. Yeah,

0:40:46.520 --> 0:40:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I feel like he has just been the Metrome man.

0:40:48.800 --> 0:40:52.759
<v Speaker 1>He is so reliable to play good basketball every night. Now,

0:40:53.719 --> 0:40:56.000
<v Speaker 1>sometimes the jumper goes in at a really high level.

0:40:56.040 --> 0:40:59.160
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes it doesn't, but it doesn't impact the way he

0:40:59.200 --> 0:41:03.040
<v Speaker 1>plays general. And I'm just very appreciative of him. Yeah,

0:41:03.120 --> 0:41:07.000
<v Speaker 1>he plays very intelligent basketball. And I think, you know,

0:41:07.080 --> 0:41:10.000
<v Speaker 1>I joked about this with you last night where I said,

0:41:10.280 --> 0:41:13.279
<v Speaker 1>I just don't understand how the fan base that came

0:41:13.360 --> 0:41:16.239
<v Speaker 1>to love and adore j R. Smith can't, you know,

0:41:16.840 --> 0:41:20.239
<v Speaker 1>sometimes embrace a streak shooter that does a lot of

0:41:20.280 --> 0:41:23.640
<v Speaker 1>other things really well, right, Like Jr's passing in his defense,

0:41:24.400 --> 0:41:27.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, was great. Like I think he was a

0:41:27.760 --> 0:41:30.040
<v Speaker 1>very underrated defender in his time with the Cavs. I

0:41:30.080 --> 0:41:33.319
<v Speaker 1>think he's a better defender than Max. I think, you know,

0:41:33.400 --> 0:41:36.840
<v Speaker 1>he was a more dynamic shooter, but Max brings a

0:41:36.920 --> 0:41:38.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of that same stuff to the table. And I

0:41:38.960 --> 0:41:42.640
<v Speaker 1>think his chemistry, his ability to reliably run a two

0:41:42.680 --> 0:41:45.360
<v Speaker 1>man game with Alan and Mobley is a huge asset.

0:41:46.440 --> 0:41:50.920
<v Speaker 1>And you know, when you play a team like Milwaukee, Man,

0:41:51.600 --> 0:41:54.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to be disrespectful saying this, but when

0:41:54.480 --> 0:41:58.759
<v Speaker 1>you are a team that sometimes gets disorganized defensively, that's

0:41:58.840 --> 0:42:02.400
<v Speaker 1>the exact type of team that maxters can kill because

0:42:02.400 --> 0:42:05.720
<v Speaker 1>he is so intelligent in finding those passing lanes, finding

0:42:05.719 --> 0:42:08.799
<v Speaker 1>those pockets off ball to get those shots up. Those

0:42:08.960 --> 0:42:13.399
<v Speaker 1>crawl around jumpers from the corner were absolutely absurd. And

0:42:13.680 --> 0:42:16.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a reason why when you dive into

0:42:16.800 --> 0:42:21.239
<v Speaker 1>the kind of advanced analytics on his shot profile, he

0:42:21.400 --> 0:42:24.200
<v Speaker 1>always rates out as a better shooter than his percentages

0:42:24.239 --> 0:42:27.960
<v Speaker 1>because of his shot difficulty. You know, I think that's

0:42:27.960 --> 0:42:30.720
<v Speaker 1>something that you have to take into consideration. I would

0:42:30.760 --> 0:42:34.520
<v Speaker 1>also say at the same time, sometimes that shot difficulty

0:42:34.680 --> 0:42:38.600
<v Speaker 1>is based on his choices as a shooter, Like you know,

0:42:38.719 --> 0:42:41.359
<v Speaker 1>it's not always hey, you know, he's being clamped down.

0:42:41.760 --> 0:42:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes he's going to take some ridiculous threes. But I

0:42:45.160 --> 0:42:47.960
<v Speaker 1>think you need a guy like that and I think

0:42:48.480 --> 0:42:51.400
<v Speaker 1>once now that you know, we have DeAndre Hunter in

0:42:51.440 --> 0:42:54.839
<v Speaker 1>the mix, now that Dean Wade is back and playing well,

0:42:54.920 --> 0:42:57.239
<v Speaker 1>you have Samui, you have Isaac Corral, all these other

0:42:57.239 --> 0:43:00.520
<v Speaker 1>guys that are bringing other things to the table, being

0:43:00.560 --> 0:43:04.440
<v Speaker 1>a little less reliant on Max and having alternatives on

0:43:04.520 --> 0:43:08.240
<v Speaker 1>those evenings where it's not working. Just like, it almost

0:43:08.280 --> 0:43:10.719
<v Speaker 1>frees me up to enjoy it even more because I

0:43:10.800 --> 0:43:13.440
<v Speaker 1>really do think what he brings to the table is

0:43:13.600 --> 0:43:16.320
<v Speaker 1>valuable and it's going to matter in the playoffs. Yeah,

0:43:16.640 --> 0:43:18.799
<v Speaker 1>I just think he's a guy I would go to

0:43:18.840 --> 0:43:21.319
<v Speaker 1>war with ten times out of ten. And I pulled

0:43:21.360 --> 0:43:23.239
<v Speaker 1>up his basketball reference and I was like, I wonder

0:43:23.320 --> 0:43:25.520
<v Speaker 1>other numbers are actually looking because I haven't just looked

0:43:25.520 --> 0:43:27.719
<v Speaker 1>in a while, I actually look. Can I guess what

0:43:27.920 --> 0:43:30.319
<v Speaker 1>his three point percent is at go ahead? He shot

0:43:30.360 --> 0:43:33.719
<v Speaker 1>the thirty five last year? Is he at thirty eight

0:43:33.760 --> 0:43:37.040
<v Speaker 1>this year? He is at thirty eight point one, I'm sorry,

0:43:37.120 --> 0:43:41.439
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight point three. And he's up to three point

0:43:41.480 --> 0:43:44.080
<v Speaker 1>volume by about one three point ten per thirty six.

0:43:45.080 --> 0:43:47.920
<v Speaker 1>He's shooting a little bit better from the field three

0:43:48.000 --> 0:43:51.719
<v Speaker 1>percentage points better from three. The free throw rate is down,

0:43:51.800 --> 0:43:56.480
<v Speaker 1>which makes sense, but here's a little factoid, because remember

0:43:56.560 --> 0:44:00.719
<v Speaker 1>last year, we were so excited about his playmaking, the

0:44:00.760 --> 0:44:03.120
<v Speaker 1>fact that he was averaging just under five assists for

0:44:03.200 --> 0:44:06.600
<v Speaker 1>thirty six and we were like, man, we didn't know

0:44:06.640 --> 0:44:09.600
<v Speaker 1>he could do that, But we were kind of like,

0:44:10.360 --> 0:44:14.239
<v Speaker 1>is that going to play a lot of ball handling minutes? Yeah,

0:44:14.800 --> 0:44:17.879
<v Speaker 1>because Darius and Donovan were hurt so much of the year,

0:44:18.239 --> 0:44:20.879
<v Speaker 1>they didn't have ty Jerome like he had to run

0:44:20.920 --> 0:44:23.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of offense. So it was one of those

0:44:23.120 --> 0:44:25.880
<v Speaker 1>things where we were glad the assist numbers were up,

0:44:25.880 --> 0:44:29.799
<v Speaker 1>but were like, maybe that's not Maybe that's reflective of

0:44:29.920 --> 0:44:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the roster situation more than anything. Yeah, his assists for

0:44:34.680 --> 0:44:38.920
<v Speaker 1>thirty six have stayed almost even. Four point six last

0:44:39.000 --> 0:44:42.520
<v Speaker 1>year is at four point four this year. You know,

0:44:43.239 --> 0:44:48.239
<v Speaker 1>And this is a much, much, much smaller example, but

0:44:48.640 --> 0:44:51.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, considering we have another game coming up against

0:44:51.440 --> 0:44:54.319
<v Speaker 1>them recently and we played them, it's the examples fresh

0:44:54.360 --> 0:44:57.120
<v Speaker 1>in my mind. But last year, when Memphis had all

0:44:57.160 --> 0:45:00.279
<v Speaker 1>those injuries, they let Jaron Jackson explore the space and

0:45:00.480 --> 0:45:03.319
<v Speaker 1>really paid dividends when they got healthy. I think that's

0:45:03.360 --> 0:45:06.840
<v Speaker 1>reflective in Max's playmaking, right, and he's not being forced

0:45:06.840 --> 0:45:09.320
<v Speaker 1>into those spots he was last year when he had.

0:45:09.200 --> 0:45:10.360
<v Speaker 2>To play so much point guard.

0:45:10.760 --> 0:45:14.560
<v Speaker 1>But the reads he makes, I feel like all kind

0:45:14.560 --> 0:45:18.600
<v Speaker 1>of the the the advancements he made in that category

0:45:18.680 --> 0:45:21.200
<v Speaker 1>last year are still there this year. I'm I'm surprised

0:45:21.239 --> 0:45:23.680
<v Speaker 1>that the number is so high, just because you know,

0:45:24.000 --> 0:45:29.080
<v Speaker 1>all these playmaking reps for Jerome and Mobiley and all

0:45:29.160 --> 0:45:31.720
<v Speaker 1>that stuff. I would have ASSU was cut in half

0:45:31.880 --> 0:45:36.480
<v Speaker 1>just by circumstance, Mobiley is taking on such a larger

0:45:36.600 --> 0:45:38.759
<v Speaker 1>part of that than he did last year. Darius has

0:45:38.800 --> 0:45:42.520
<v Speaker 1>been phenomenal. Donovan Is I think he's taken a step up.

0:45:42.600 --> 0:45:47.200
<v Speaker 1>We've talked about it. I literally didn't exist last year. Yeah, right,

0:45:47.560 --> 0:45:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Like I just I'm shocked that that is in fact

0:45:50.560 --> 0:45:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the case. But yeah, I think, you know, that's a

0:45:52.560 --> 0:45:55.600
<v Speaker 1>great poll. I think that's a great example of you know,

0:45:55.760 --> 0:45:58.480
<v Speaker 1>him just being kind of that connective player. And you know,

0:45:59.280 --> 0:46:02.040
<v Speaker 1>I one thing that I want to point out because

0:46:02.080 --> 0:46:04.600
<v Speaker 1>on the last podcast, I mentioned how DeAndre hadn't played

0:46:04.600 --> 0:46:07.440
<v Speaker 1>any minutes with the Core since his first you know

0:46:07.680 --> 0:46:11.040
<v Speaker 1>game with the Calves. The last two games, Kenny has

0:46:11.080 --> 0:46:14.279
<v Speaker 1>got him second half minutes with the Core four, So

0:46:14.320 --> 0:46:16.880
<v Speaker 1>that's at least encouraging. I'd like to continue to see that.

0:46:17.520 --> 0:46:21.960
<v Speaker 1>But you know, this current kind of balance is working

0:46:22.000 --> 0:46:26.359
<v Speaker 1>pretty well. DeAndre has been terrific as they stagger. If

0:46:26.400 --> 0:46:28.839
<v Speaker 1>I look at the cleaning the glass numbers, Carter, you're

0:46:28.840 --> 0:46:30.759
<v Speaker 1>going to laugh at this. This is this is how

0:46:30.800 --> 0:46:33.880
<v Speaker 1>reliable Kenny is when it comes to rotations. But we

0:46:33.960 --> 0:46:36.640
<v Speaker 1>know that Garland and Allen is the main pairing so

0:46:36.800 --> 0:46:39.280
<v Speaker 1>far with DeAndre Hunter, they've played one hundred and fifty

0:46:39.360 --> 0:46:43.239
<v Speaker 1>nine possessions. Mitchell mobleyan Hunter without Garland and Allen have

0:46:43.280 --> 0:46:47.400
<v Speaker 1>played one hundred and sixty three possessions. It's almost down, baby.

0:46:48.400 --> 0:46:51.160
<v Speaker 1>And you know you look at the Garland, he's got

0:46:51.400 --> 0:46:54.080
<v Speaker 1>a guy and the staff. That's just his rotations. Guy.

0:46:54.400 --> 0:46:55.799
<v Speaker 2>Oh, someone's definitely doing it.

0:46:56.000 --> 0:47:00.160
<v Speaker 1>There's no way he's remembering this while he's coaching the game. No, no, no, no,

0:47:00.160 --> 0:47:03.160
<v Speaker 1>no no, there's got to be some assistance. But to

0:47:03.200 --> 0:47:06.319
<v Speaker 1>give the numbers for those lineups, Garland, Allen and Hunter

0:47:06.920 --> 0:47:09.800
<v Speaker 1>plus twenty two net rating, Mitchell, Mobley and Hunter plus

0:47:09.840 --> 0:47:14.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty net rating, Yeah, that rocks like they are very

0:47:14.040 --> 0:47:18.359
<v Speaker 1>good in every way. And you know, I think you're

0:47:18.400 --> 0:47:20.440
<v Speaker 1>correct in pointing out that the starting lineup has not

0:47:20.560 --> 0:47:23.680
<v Speaker 1>been good recently. I think a lot of that has

0:47:23.719 --> 0:47:26.719
<v Speaker 1>been effort based, like they have not seemed as locked in.

0:47:27.200 --> 0:47:29.160
<v Speaker 1>The Other part is, you know, the Guards are going

0:47:29.200 --> 0:47:31.719
<v Speaker 1>through a bit of a slump. Darius had a couple

0:47:31.719 --> 0:47:34.399
<v Speaker 1>of games where it looked like, you know, was coming back.

0:47:34.440 --> 0:47:37.759
<v Speaker 1>I thought Miami was pretty good Charlotte even though he

0:47:37.800 --> 0:47:40.919
<v Speaker 1>went four of ten, it's still twenty points on ten

0:47:41.000 --> 0:47:42.240
<v Speaker 1>shots because he got.

0:47:42.120 --> 0:47:43.279
<v Speaker 2>A lot of free throws there.

0:47:43.960 --> 0:47:46.960
<v Speaker 1>But you look at the last four games, man Darius

0:47:47.040 --> 0:47:49.640
<v Speaker 1>is twenty of fifty seven from the field and twelve

0:47:49.719 --> 0:47:52.640
<v Speaker 1>of thirty four from three, and Donovan is twenty five

0:47:52.680 --> 0:47:55.320
<v Speaker 1>of sixty eight from the field and six of thirty

0:47:55.360 --> 0:47:58.120
<v Speaker 1>from three. That lineup's not going to be as good

0:47:58.160 --> 0:48:03.440
<v Speaker 1>if the Guards aren't shooting well. Yeah, absolutely, And I

0:48:03.480 --> 0:48:05.279
<v Speaker 1>do think there's slumma just a little bit, but not

0:48:05.400 --> 0:48:08.880
<v Speaker 1>in a way that is like, you know, horrible. I

0:48:08.880 --> 0:48:11.320
<v Speaker 1>have a little factoid for you, justin go for it.

0:48:12.320 --> 0:48:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Who do you think leads the NBA and plus minus

0:48:15.840 --> 0:48:17.640
<v Speaker 1>in the last ten games?

0:48:18.160 --> 0:48:18.399
<v Speaker 2>Hunter?

0:48:18.800 --> 0:48:24.960
<v Speaker 1>Sure does? Yeah, And isn't that fun that they just again,

0:48:25.000 --> 0:48:27.759
<v Speaker 1>they have all these options first off, which is just wonderful,

0:48:28.239 --> 0:48:32.279
<v Speaker 1>But isn't it fun that a guy who has been

0:48:32.320 --> 0:48:37.600
<v Speaker 1>criticized for being a pretty good stats but the IMPACT's

0:48:37.640 --> 0:48:40.560
<v Speaker 1>not there, you know, you just drop him into this

0:48:40.640 --> 0:48:45.080
<v Speaker 1>new environment and immediately he becomes one of the best

0:48:45.160 --> 0:48:48.279
<v Speaker 1>on off guys in the NBA.

0:48:49.440 --> 0:48:51.800
<v Speaker 2>Is fine. It's fine. Honestly.

0:48:51.880 --> 0:48:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I like that that trade is kind of working out

0:48:53.719 --> 0:48:57.200
<v Speaker 1>to be a win win because at Atlanta really needed

0:48:57.239 --> 0:49:00.439
<v Speaker 1>the playmaking, they needed warm bodies, they needed. They got

0:49:00.440 --> 0:49:06.120
<v Speaker 1>three playable players at the deadline. Yeah, and that helps.

0:49:06.760 --> 0:49:08.960
<v Speaker 1>And you know, George had been playing great this year.

0:49:09.040 --> 0:49:12.399
<v Speaker 1>Karris has been playing really really well up until when

0:49:12.400 --> 0:49:15.200
<v Speaker 1>he had that hand injury. So for those two guys

0:49:15.200 --> 0:49:17.759
<v Speaker 1>to be playing really well and given Atlanta what they need,

0:49:18.160 --> 0:49:21.040
<v Speaker 1>that's terrific. DeAndre has been giving the kvs exactly what

0:49:21.080 --> 0:49:23.799
<v Speaker 1>they need. And as we said at the time of

0:49:23.840 --> 0:49:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the trade, I was excited to see the trickle down effects.

0:49:27.120 --> 0:49:29.719
<v Speaker 1>I was excited to see Moro Kora at shooting guard.

0:49:29.760 --> 0:49:33.680
<v Speaker 1>I was excited to see, you know, having that alternative

0:49:33.800 --> 0:49:36.719
<v Speaker 1>to Dean weight Like, it just feels like it's been

0:49:36.920 --> 0:49:40.600
<v Speaker 1>such a bounced roster and it's no surprise that DeAndre

0:49:40.719 --> 0:49:42.960
<v Speaker 1>has had that kind of an impact and you know,

0:49:43.840 --> 0:49:47.479
<v Speaker 1>I think, just reflecting on the last couple of years here,

0:49:47.960 --> 0:49:50.160
<v Speaker 1>if Darius and Donovan were having a stretch like that,

0:49:51.360 --> 0:49:53.560
<v Speaker 1>things wouldn't be going well. Even in twenty two to

0:49:53.600 --> 0:49:55.759
<v Speaker 1>twenty three, I remember there was a January where neither

0:49:55.800 --> 0:49:58.279
<v Speaker 1>of them was shooting particularly well. I think the flu

0:49:58.360 --> 0:50:00.880
<v Speaker 1>was running through the team, and then went five hundred

0:50:01.360 --> 0:50:04.840
<v Speaker 1>for that month. Now you can kind of have this,

0:50:05.920 --> 0:50:08.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, a stretch like this where the shots aren't falling.

0:50:09.000 --> 0:50:10.920
<v Speaker 1>But I feel like both of them are still playing

0:50:10.920 --> 0:50:14.200
<v Speaker 1>pretty good basketball. Like I just think a five hundred

0:50:14.239 --> 0:50:16.960
<v Speaker 1>month would probably give you as many losses as we

0:50:17.040 --> 0:50:23.040
<v Speaker 1>have this season pretty much. But like you know, when

0:50:23.080 --> 0:50:25.319
<v Speaker 1>it comes to Darius and Donovan, even when they're not

0:50:25.360 --> 0:50:27.640
<v Speaker 1>shooting well, I still want to see those thirteen to

0:50:27.719 --> 0:50:30.879
<v Speaker 1>fifteen attempts, right, Like, don't press beyond that. But you're

0:50:30.920 --> 0:50:34.560
<v Speaker 1>good enough shooters, keep taking the right shots. I thought

0:50:34.560 --> 0:50:37.840
<v Speaker 1>the only game where Darius was like jacking up shots

0:50:38.160 --> 0:50:41.480
<v Speaker 1>and it felt bad with Chicago. Outside of that, I

0:50:41.520 --> 0:50:44.600
<v Speaker 1>feel like he's taking the right kinds of shots right

0:50:44.800 --> 0:50:49.440
<v Speaker 1>and Miami and Charlotte. I was very good with his games. Donovan,

0:50:49.520 --> 0:50:52.400
<v Speaker 1>even though he's not shooting all these last four games.

0:50:52.800 --> 0:50:56.560
<v Speaker 1>He's up this playmaking. He's generating opportunities for guys. He's

0:50:56.560 --> 0:51:00.800
<v Speaker 1>getting ten, generating ten assist opportunities per game over that stretch,

0:51:01.120 --> 0:51:04.359
<v Speaker 1>Darius thirteen. That's what you want to see. They're both

0:51:04.400 --> 0:51:07.440
<v Speaker 1>playing hard on the defensive end. You know, they're they're

0:51:07.480 --> 0:51:11.080
<v Speaker 1>chipping in on the glass. It's it just feels like,

0:51:11.160 --> 0:51:13.640
<v Speaker 1>you know you're able to weather that storm a little

0:51:13.640 --> 0:51:16.560
<v Speaker 1>bit more. And for you to play a game against

0:51:16.600 --> 0:51:20.880
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks regenerate good looks. Your guards don't shoot particularly well.

0:51:21.400 --> 0:51:23.839
<v Speaker 1>The you know, big time score that you brought in

0:51:23.840 --> 0:51:26.480
<v Speaker 1>in DeAndre Hunter doesn't have a good shooting game, and

0:51:26.520 --> 0:51:30.960
<v Speaker 1>you still comfortably win against a Bucks team that's had

0:51:31.000 --> 0:51:34.840
<v Speaker 1>won nine of its last eleven games. That's a pretty

0:51:34.880 --> 0:51:38.360
<v Speaker 1>damn good feeling. It absolutely is, buddy, And so is

0:51:38.400 --> 0:51:40.440
<v Speaker 1>fourteen in a row. And I got to ask you,

0:51:40.480 --> 0:51:43.560
<v Speaker 1>I know we're getting near probably near closing time here,

0:51:44.239 --> 0:51:46.799
<v Speaker 1>but when does this streak end?

0:51:46.880 --> 0:51:47.120
<v Speaker 2>Dude?

0:51:47.200 --> 0:51:52.799
<v Speaker 1>Because you go this week it's home versus Brooklyn, then

0:51:53.040 --> 0:51:59.160
<v Speaker 1>on Friday at Memphis, Sunday ABC afternoon game against Orlando.

0:52:00.600 --> 0:52:02.759
<v Speaker 1>Do they lose this week or do they go up

0:52:02.800 --> 0:52:07.839
<v Speaker 1>to seventeen. I'm going to predict. This is a fun game.

0:52:07.880 --> 0:52:10.759
<v Speaker 1>Predict when the Cavs are going to lose. It's hard.

0:52:11.280 --> 0:52:15.719
<v Speaker 1>Here's the one Wednesday, the nineteenth at the Kings One.

0:52:15.760 --> 0:52:18.040
<v Speaker 1>I feel I feel like we always have a funky

0:52:18.080 --> 0:52:21.279
<v Speaker 1>game there. That's the third game in four nights. You're

0:52:21.320 --> 0:52:24.640
<v Speaker 1>at a back to back, still close enough to daylight

0:52:24.680 --> 0:52:28.040
<v Speaker 1>saving time, which just sucks. I'm going through hell right

0:52:28.080 --> 0:52:30.360
<v Speaker 1>now everydow. You don't have children. I don't want to

0:52:30.360 --> 0:52:31.960
<v Speaker 1>talk to you. You're not allowed to talk to me

0:52:32.000 --> 0:52:32.320
<v Speaker 1>about this.

0:52:32.920 --> 0:52:34.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm you know, I'm tired.

0:52:35.040 --> 0:52:39.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm oh, you're tired. Yeah, but you know three and

0:52:39.800 --> 0:52:42.120
<v Speaker 1>four you travel to La then you travel up to

0:52:42.160 --> 0:52:45.080
<v Speaker 1>Sacramento to play that back to back. I can see

0:52:45.080 --> 0:52:47.799
<v Speaker 1>it happening there. But you know, if that is the case,

0:52:47.840 --> 0:52:50.240
<v Speaker 1>and if I am right, as I so often am,

0:52:50.680 --> 0:52:52.360
<v Speaker 1>that's a franchise record winning streak.

0:52:52.400 --> 0:52:53.799
<v Speaker 2>That's a lot of fun. Yeah.

0:52:53.840 --> 0:52:55.239
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the only got to win two more to

0:52:55.280 --> 0:52:58.719
<v Speaker 1>set a new franchise record. So I gotta say, I

0:52:58.719 --> 0:53:01.120
<v Speaker 1>think that's a great poll. I think it's probably the

0:53:01.200 --> 0:53:04.920
<v Speaker 1>right pole. An important thing to say for the entirety

0:53:04.920 --> 0:53:09.279
<v Speaker 1>of March. The Calves do not play the same you know,

0:53:09.960 --> 0:53:12.640
<v Speaker 1>stay in the They don't have consecutive home games the

0:53:12.800 --> 0:53:15.440
<v Speaker 1>entire month, so they never are going to play in

0:53:15.480 --> 0:53:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the same place two games in a row, and they're

0:53:19.840 --> 0:53:22.759
<v Speaker 1>pretty much on the road in perpetuity for the entire month.

0:53:23.160 --> 0:53:26.520
<v Speaker 1>So this will be a big, you know, weight of

0:53:26.640 --> 0:53:31.799
<v Speaker 1>travel month, especially with a big schedule challenge month. Yeah,

0:53:32.200 --> 0:53:34.680
<v Speaker 1>after Brooklyn they have two days off. They don't have

0:53:34.719 --> 0:53:36.680
<v Speaker 1>two days off the rest of the month. They are

0:53:36.680 --> 0:53:39.200
<v Speaker 1>playing every other day, and they are flying between every

0:53:39.200 --> 0:53:42.120
<v Speaker 1>single one of those games. So I'm going to go ahead,

0:53:42.200 --> 0:53:45.080
<v Speaker 1>and I'm actually gonna say I think they're due for

0:53:45.160 --> 0:53:48.440
<v Speaker 1>a national TV stinker, and I'm going to pick Sunday

0:53:48.560 --> 0:53:49.480
<v Speaker 1>against Orlando.

0:53:49.880 --> 0:53:50.399
<v Speaker 2>It's one.

0:53:50.840 --> 0:53:54.680
<v Speaker 1>It's a matinee afternoon game against the team they're pretty

0:53:54.719 --> 0:53:59.040
<v Speaker 1>sure they got, you know, they just beat him by forty.

0:53:59.040 --> 0:54:03.359
<v Speaker 1>That's always a hard game because they're embarrassed and they

0:54:03.360 --> 0:54:06.120
<v Speaker 1>want to come for your throat, but you're like, we

0:54:06.239 --> 0:54:10.880
<v Speaker 1>got these suckers. It's just got like a cock. Plus

0:54:10.960 --> 0:54:12.960
<v Speaker 1>like that Friday Memphis game, I think is going to

0:54:13.000 --> 0:54:16.480
<v Speaker 1>be tough, and I don't know, if I had to pick,

0:54:16.520 --> 0:54:18.440
<v Speaker 1>it'll be that one. But I think your pick's probably

0:54:18.440 --> 0:54:18.960
<v Speaker 1>better than mine.

0:54:19.000 --> 0:54:21.840
<v Speaker 2>To be honest. Okay, well, you know, my mind's a

0:54:21.880 --> 0:54:22.840
<v Speaker 2>little to.

0:54:22.800 --> 0:54:24.520
<v Speaker 1>See him get to twenty, though I want him to

0:54:24.560 --> 0:54:25.240
<v Speaker 1>get to twenty.

0:54:25.560 --> 0:54:28.480
<v Speaker 2>I mean, I'm staying on brand. That's really good.

0:54:28.560 --> 0:54:31.160
<v Speaker 1>By the way, about all this is that even though

0:54:31.160 --> 0:54:34.120
<v Speaker 1>this month sucks, they do have the streak to kind

0:54:34.120 --> 0:54:38.360
<v Speaker 1>of motivate them. They do, like, because if this was

0:54:38.480 --> 0:54:40.520
<v Speaker 1>if they weren't streaking, I think they would have they

0:54:40.560 --> 0:54:43.680
<v Speaker 1>would definitely lose one of these games, just because you know,

0:54:43.840 --> 0:54:47.640
<v Speaker 1>eventually you lose, and instead they're gonna be like, I

0:54:47.680 --> 0:54:51.120
<v Speaker 1>don't want to lose the streak to Sacramento on a

0:54:51.680 --> 0:54:54.800
<v Speaker 1>late at night on a Wednesday, No, thank you. Yeah,

0:54:55.200 --> 0:54:57.720
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know. We'll see what if this went out.

0:54:59.360 --> 0:55:02.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean't really anything out anymore with these With these dudes.

0:55:03.200 --> 0:55:05.960
<v Speaker 1>The fun thing is, man like, seventy is still kind

0:55:05.960 --> 0:55:08.959
<v Speaker 1>of possible, you know, they if they all it's more

0:55:09.000 --> 0:55:11.279
<v Speaker 1>than kind of they're on pace for sixty nine.

0:55:12.160 --> 0:55:12.600
<v Speaker 2>Nice.

0:55:13.440 --> 0:55:15.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, the number that I really just wanted to

0:55:15.360 --> 0:55:17.239
<v Speaker 1>see is sixty seven because I want to get that

0:55:17.280 --> 0:55:19.960
<v Speaker 1>franchise win record. So if you drop a couple, that's fine,

0:55:20.280 --> 0:55:22.520
<v Speaker 1>but that's looking more and more feasible. Man Like, that

0:55:22.640 --> 0:55:25.560
<v Speaker 1>this is this month is going to be tricky. I

0:55:25.600 --> 0:55:27.640
<v Speaker 1>think they're they're really going to be battling the schedule.

0:55:27.640 --> 0:55:30.280
<v Speaker 1>But this is one of those spots where hey really

0:55:30.280 --> 0:55:32.279
<v Speaker 1>benefit from the depth the.

0:55:32.280 --> 0:55:33.640
<v Speaker 2>Last topic I had.

0:55:34.160 --> 0:55:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I think this is going to be a shorter one,

0:55:35.600 --> 0:55:37.319
<v Speaker 1>so I'm okay doing this even though we've kind of

0:55:37.320 --> 0:55:40.680
<v Speaker 1>gone along today. I wanted to ask you if you

0:55:40.680 --> 0:55:43.080
<v Speaker 1>could pick who you'd rather play, not who you think

0:55:43.160 --> 0:55:45.200
<v Speaker 1>is the better matchup for the Cavs, you as an

0:55:45.200 --> 0:55:48.000
<v Speaker 1>emotional fan, who would you rather play in the second round?

0:55:48.120 --> 0:55:50.600
<v Speaker 1>The New York Knicks or the Milwaukee Bucks. This is

0:55:50.760 --> 0:55:54.000
<v Speaker 1>less of a realistic hypothetical because the Bucks just lost

0:55:54.000 --> 0:55:57.440
<v Speaker 1>two games and kind of lost the momentum there. But

0:55:57.520 --> 0:56:00.239
<v Speaker 1>with Brunson, you know, missing some time here and the

0:56:00.280 --> 0:56:03.919
<v Speaker 1>Bucks being hot, it's at least a possibility that those

0:56:03.920 --> 0:56:07.160
<v Speaker 1>two flop in the stantics. Who would you rather play

0:56:07.160 --> 0:56:10.360
<v Speaker 1>in the second round? I don't Luckily I don't have

0:56:10.400 --> 0:56:12.959
<v Speaker 1>to worry about it, both narratively and basketball. I would

0:56:13.000 --> 0:56:16.759
<v Speaker 1>like to beat the New York Knicks. I don't like

0:56:16.960 --> 0:56:19.319
<v Speaker 1>I don't like that the embarrassed is two years ago.

0:56:19.680 --> 0:56:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I think the only way to really wash the stench

0:56:22.360 --> 0:56:24.959
<v Speaker 1>out of an ass kicking is to go get them back.

0:56:25.760 --> 0:56:28.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think this team is so well built to

0:56:28.560 --> 0:56:31.600
<v Speaker 1>get that next team back. And I don't think they're

0:56:31.680 --> 0:56:38.440
<v Speaker 1>meaningfully more talented than the Bucks, no, Like I I

0:56:38.440 --> 0:56:40.040
<v Speaker 1>think I kind of trust the Bucks more.

0:56:40.120 --> 0:56:40.239
<v Speaker 2>Like.

0:56:40.560 --> 0:56:43.279
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the other advantage of playing the Knicks is I

0:56:43.280 --> 0:56:46.080
<v Speaker 1>don't think Boston's as well suited to defend you, honus

0:56:46.120 --> 0:56:49.720
<v Speaker 1>as we are, you know, Jason Gingham taking those body

0:56:49.719 --> 0:56:52.120
<v Speaker 1>blows for an entire series. I would like them after

0:56:53.200 --> 0:56:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Here's the thing. Would the Celtics sweep the Knicks? I

0:56:57.680 --> 0:56:58.320
<v Speaker 1>think they would.

0:56:58.560 --> 0:56:59.319
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think they would.

0:57:00.160 --> 0:57:02.359
<v Speaker 1>You know, maybe if the Knicks get hot, I think

0:57:02.400 --> 0:57:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the Caves and Celtics would both either sweep the next

0:57:04.600 --> 0:57:06.480
<v Speaker 1>or be a five game series if the Knicks get

0:57:06.520 --> 0:57:07.760
<v Speaker 1>hot for a particular game.

0:57:08.640 --> 0:57:10.560
<v Speaker 2>So I would like that from a.

0:57:10.600 --> 0:57:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Narrative standpoint, But I also kind of like I'm weighing,

0:57:16.960 --> 0:57:20.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, going into last night's game, I wanted Milwaukee

0:57:20.640 --> 0:57:24.560
<v Speaker 1>to go above them, go above the Knicks, because playing

0:57:25.000 --> 0:57:28.480
<v Speaker 1>playing the best player in the conference. That's always scary

0:57:28.520 --> 0:57:32.000
<v Speaker 1>going into a playoff series, but really validating if you win.

0:57:32.400 --> 0:57:34.480
<v Speaker 1>That's the thing that is such a good feather in

0:57:34.520 --> 0:57:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the cap that you know, and I feel comfortable that

0:57:38.800 --> 0:57:41.200
<v Speaker 1>we would win that series. I don't think that they

0:57:41.200 --> 0:57:43.880
<v Speaker 1>can guard us on the perimeter. I think we're well

0:57:43.920 --> 0:57:47.640
<v Speaker 1>suited to guard Jannis, and all due respect to cal Kuzma,

0:57:48.480 --> 0:57:51.200
<v Speaker 1>him being there instead of Chris Middleton does not make

0:57:51.240 --> 0:57:52.000
<v Speaker 1>me fear them more.

0:57:52.960 --> 0:57:53.120
<v Speaker 2>So.

0:57:53.240 --> 0:57:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I think he helps them in a lot of ways,

0:57:55.760 --> 0:57:58.480
<v Speaker 1>but not against the Cabs, not against Cats. That's that's

0:57:58.560 --> 0:58:04.600
<v Speaker 1>exactly right. So I I think if I stop caring

0:58:04.680 --> 0:58:07.960
<v Speaker 1>so much about what national podcasts are saying bringing up

0:58:08.000 --> 0:58:10.479
<v Speaker 1>the New York Knicks, I think, in my heart of hearts,

0:58:10.480 --> 0:58:14.000
<v Speaker 1>i'd say Milwaukee. Oh, I don't care what national podcasters say.

0:58:14.360 --> 0:58:15.440
<v Speaker 1>I want them to hurt.

0:58:16.040 --> 0:58:16.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah.

0:58:16.600 --> 0:58:20.120
<v Speaker 1>I want to see Nick Muse crying. If I'm honest,

0:58:20.400 --> 0:58:23.320
<v Speaker 1>if I'm honest with myself and I'm honest about what

0:58:23.440 --> 0:58:25.680
<v Speaker 1>a petty individual I am, I think the answer is

0:58:25.720 --> 0:58:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the New York Knicks. Oh, it's gotta be dude. I

0:58:29.600 --> 0:58:32.600
<v Speaker 1>want to I want I want Jared Allen to go

0:58:32.680 --> 0:58:35.880
<v Speaker 1>into the end of the Garden and a close out

0:58:35.960 --> 0:58:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Game four and to and tell them the lights are

0:58:39.600 --> 0:58:45.760
<v Speaker 1>perfectly bright. I want everything he's gotta wear some sunglasses

0:58:45.880 --> 0:58:47.200
<v Speaker 1>or something to the close out game.

0:58:47.320 --> 0:58:47.919
<v Speaker 2>That'd be great.

0:58:49.360 --> 0:58:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, how about you guys listeners dropping in the comments?

0:58:53.280 --> 0:58:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Who would you rather play in the second round? Nicks

0:58:55.360 --> 0:58:57.760
<v Speaker 1>or Bucks? A little interaction there. Big thanks to all

0:58:57.800 --> 0:58:59.840
<v Speaker 1>you guys tuning in and hanging out on youtubehere. You're

0:58:59.840 --> 0:59:02.240
<v Speaker 1>preppreciate you guys. Make sure you like and subscribe. Click

0:59:02.280 --> 0:59:04.800
<v Speaker 1>that notification, belsay, no one, we're going live. If you're

0:59:04.840 --> 0:59:06.760
<v Speaker 1>listening via podcast and you want to support us, leave

0:59:06.840 --> 0:59:09.680
<v Speaker 1>us a rating, lead, review, subscribe, unsubscribe, resubscribe and help

0:59:09.720 --> 0:59:11.640
<v Speaker 1>cook those books you want to be parre the Chase

0:59:11.680 --> 0:59:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Downs exclusive discord chats and the screenshild their view to

0:59:14.240 --> 0:59:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Chase downpodot gmail dot com. However you choose to support us,

0:59:17.200 --> 0:59:19.080
<v Speaker 1>we really do appreciate it. Make sure you guys are

0:59:19.080 --> 0:59:19.800
<v Speaker 1>staying safe out there.

0:59:19.840 --> 0:59:21.400
<v Speaker 2>Until next time. Jokay