WEBVTT - Did our Universe evolve?

0:00:00.160 --> 0:00:03.840
<v Speaker 1>Hi, it's Jorge and Daniel here. And this holiday season,

0:00:03.920 --> 0:00:06.440
<v Speaker 1>if you're looking for a gift for yourself, for a friend,

0:00:06.600 --> 0:00:09.000
<v Speaker 1>or for your your family, why not get him the

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:11.479
<v Speaker 1>Gift of Answers about the Universe. To check out our

0:00:11.520 --> 0:00:14.640
<v Speaker 1>new book Frequently Asked Questions about the Universe, you can

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:18.160
<v Speaker 1>find details at Universe f a Q dot com. Thanks

0:00:18.200 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 1>for supporting the podcast. Happy holidays everyone, Hey or hey?

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:34.479
<v Speaker 1>Do you think that our universe is well suited to us?

0:00:35.479 --> 0:00:37.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I mean, some of it seems so

0:00:37.800 --> 0:00:42.040
<v Speaker 1>staggeringly beautiful to our eyes, you know, like stars, the galaxies,

0:00:42.200 --> 0:00:45.520
<v Speaker 1>even like the drama of the black holes. That's true,

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:49.120
<v Speaker 1>it's definitely something we can appreciate, but also sometimes seems

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:51.960
<v Speaker 1>like the universe is kind of alien to us. I

0:00:52.000 --> 0:00:54.160
<v Speaker 1>think the universe is here first, so technically we are

0:00:54.200 --> 0:00:56.800
<v Speaker 1>the eighteen Yeah, but you know, sometimes the way that

0:00:56.840 --> 0:00:59.360
<v Speaker 1>it works is so bizarre and so strange that I

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:02.040
<v Speaker 1>wonder if we're ever going to understand it, if our

0:01:02.080 --> 0:01:05.360
<v Speaker 1>minds are suited to it, maybe that's what makes it

0:01:05.520 --> 0:01:08.240
<v Speaker 1>especially suited to us. What do you mean? You know,

0:01:08.280 --> 0:01:10.680
<v Speaker 1>it's like the perfect puzzle to keep us entertained. For

0:01:10.840 --> 0:01:12.880
<v Speaker 1>attorney it's like that toy you put in front of

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:14.479
<v Speaker 1>a toddler. Why you need to get some work done.

0:01:14.520 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 1>It's like the TV for human toddlers. Maybe Steve Jobs

0:01:17.760 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 1>created the universe. Hi, I'm poor Hammad, cartoonists and the

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:39.520
<v Speaker 1>creator of PhD comics. Hi I'm Daniel. I'm a particle physicist,

0:01:39.680 --> 0:01:43.720
<v Speaker 1>and I'm constantly amazed at the strangeness and the bonkers

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:46.400
<v Speaker 1>nous of the universe that we live in. Do you

0:01:46.480 --> 0:01:49.200
<v Speaker 1>think the universe is bonkers? Like it is bonkers or

0:01:49.320 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 1>it was made bonkers or made by a bonkers I

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>won't speak to the mind of the creator if one exists,

0:01:55.880 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>but it does continue to astound me how strange and

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:01.440
<v Speaker 1>how weird the univer is, and the fact that it

0:02:01.600 --> 0:02:04.240
<v Speaker 1>is weird, that it seems strange, that it's counter to

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:07.200
<v Speaker 1>our expectations because we are part of the universe, So

0:02:07.320 --> 0:02:09.720
<v Speaker 1>why doesn't it feel intuitive to us? Well, you know

0:02:09.760 --> 0:02:12.800
<v Speaker 1>what I always say, if your expectations are not being met,

0:02:12.840 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 1>maybe you should change your expectations, Daniel, I should try

0:02:15.240 --> 0:02:18.280
<v Speaker 1>the Scandinavian approach. Just expect to be disappointed all the

0:02:18.400 --> 0:02:21.519
<v Speaker 1>time and then be pleased when you're not, or expect

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 1>to be surprised. You know, it's only weird because you

0:02:23.919 --> 0:02:28.239
<v Speaker 1>think it's weird because it doesn't mean but really, really,

0:02:28.320 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>the universe was here first, so that's true. Maybe the

0:02:30.919 --> 0:02:33.960
<v Speaker 1>universe thinks we're weird. We are kind of bonkers after all.

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to our bonkers podcast. Daniel and Jorge Explain the Universe,

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:40.000
<v Speaker 1>a production of I Heart Radio in which we have

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:42.880
<v Speaker 1>no idea what the universe thinks of us, but we

0:02:43.000 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>do dive deep into what human minds think about the universe,

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the questions we have about the way it works. At

0:02:49.040 --> 0:02:52.919
<v Speaker 1>the tiniest scale of frothing buzzing quantum particles to the

0:02:53.080 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>very biggest scale of galaxy formations and the entire fate

0:02:56.880 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 1>of the universe. We question the very nature of reality,

0:03:00.160 --> 0:03:02.600
<v Speaker 1>peel it back to see what's going on underneath, and

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:05.200
<v Speaker 1>we explain all of it to you, at least as

0:03:05.280 --> 0:03:08.120
<v Speaker 1>far as we understand. Yeah, because it is a pretty

0:03:08.200 --> 0:03:10.800
<v Speaker 1>big universe, and there's a lot that seems very puzzling

0:03:10.880 --> 0:03:14.080
<v Speaker 1>and perplexing to us. It's, you know, wonderful and amazing

0:03:14.320 --> 0:03:16.960
<v Speaker 1>and beautiful it seems sometimes but also a little bit

0:03:17.200 --> 0:03:21.320
<v Speaker 1>terrifying and powerful and sometimes even dangerous. It sometimes seems

0:03:21.360 --> 0:03:23.720
<v Speaker 1>amazing that we even live here. You know, we could

0:03:23.720 --> 0:03:26.519
<v Speaker 1>have been wiped out by a supernova nearby, or could

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:28.960
<v Speaker 1>be that with small changes in the nature of the particles,

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 1>we couldn't have had the chemistry we need for life

0:03:31.360 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 1>to happen. Sometimes it seems like a lot of things

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 1>had to go just right for us to evolve and

0:03:36.960 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 1>to survive. Yeah, and if we hadn't been here, who

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:42.040
<v Speaker 1>would be asking these questions? Daniel, That's the main question.

0:03:42.160 --> 0:03:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Probably some better looking, smarter version of us. If that's yeah, impossible,

0:03:49.800 --> 0:03:52.520
<v Speaker 1>but we just disproved that theory or improbable at least.

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, it is a pretty amazing universe. And sometimes

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:57.280
<v Speaker 1>you have to wonder, like, how did it come to

0:03:57.400 --> 0:03:59.680
<v Speaker 1>be like that? And how coming it came to be?

0:04:00.000 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>And we are here and we are looking at it

0:04:02.480 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 1>and wondering how it works. That's right, and that is

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:07.000
<v Speaker 1>one of the deepest questions in physics. We are often

0:04:07.120 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 1>asking how do things work? What's going on with these particles?

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:13.200
<v Speaker 1>But underlying that there is a question standing in the

0:04:13.280 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 1>wings waiting for an answer, and that question really is

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:19.760
<v Speaker 1>why this universe? Why is the universe of this one

0:04:19.839 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 1>and not some other one? Could it have been a

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:24.920
<v Speaker 1>different universe, or is this the only possible way for

0:04:25.240 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 1>universe to exist? What does it mean that we ended

0:04:28.160 --> 0:04:30.840
<v Speaker 1>up in this universe? Well, for thankful that we are

0:04:30.880 --> 0:04:32.920
<v Speaker 1>in this universe, I guess, or that this universe is

0:04:33.000 --> 0:04:35.960
<v Speaker 1>here for us. But to understand these questions sometimes you

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:38.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of have to look outside of physics to think

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:40.680
<v Speaker 1>about the new ways in which you might answer these

0:04:40.720 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 1>types of queries. That's right, And when we look to biology,

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:46.680
<v Speaker 1>for example, we find a very compelling and very powerful,

0:04:46.960 --> 0:04:51.040
<v Speaker 1>very broadly useful argument for understanding why creatures exist and

0:04:51.160 --> 0:04:53.800
<v Speaker 1>have certain traits. When we look at, for example, the

0:04:53.920 --> 0:04:55.840
<v Speaker 1>beaks of birds and ask like, why do they have

0:04:55.960 --> 0:04:57.880
<v Speaker 1>that shape? We get the answer when we look at

0:04:57.920 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 1>the nuts they eat or they bug that they have

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:03.239
<v Speaker 1>to pick up. They seem to be very well suited

0:05:03.320 --> 0:05:06.400
<v Speaker 1>to their environment and for a reason. Yeah, So to

0:05:06.480 --> 0:05:13.720
<v Speaker 1>be on the podcast really asking the question is the

0:05:13.880 --> 0:05:18.919
<v Speaker 1>universe the result of natural selection? All right? We're asking

0:05:19.000 --> 0:05:21.120
<v Speaker 1>some big questions. Did they hear? I know that's sort

0:05:21.160 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 1>of mind blowing to imagine, Like the universe is a

0:05:23.720 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 1>bird on an island somewhere picking on bugs. I thought

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 1>we were the birds, aren't we the birds. I think

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:33.480
<v Speaker 1>we might be the bugs and or the nuts, like

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 1>the nuts are we're wondering how some some things are

0:05:36.480 --> 0:05:38.920
<v Speaker 1>are suited to eat us. No, we are the birds,

0:05:39.000 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 1>and when physics is the nuts and we're trying to

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:43.400
<v Speaker 1>crack it open. Oh boy, I'm getting lost in these

0:05:43.440 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 1>analogies here. I know I'm driving you nuts, But it

0:05:46.240 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 1>is a fun idea to wonder if the universe could

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:51.120
<v Speaker 1>have been other ways, and if the universe that we

0:05:51.240 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>ended up when is this way because of some sort

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:58.280
<v Speaker 1>of process that guides the formation of universes to end

0:05:58.360 --> 0:06:01.720
<v Speaker 1>up at one that sort of works. WHOA you mean

0:06:01.800 --> 0:06:08.960
<v Speaker 1>like the evolution of universe is multiple universes over countless time,

0:06:09.320 --> 0:06:12.000
<v Speaker 1>somehow changing and evolving. Yeah, that's the idea. We have

0:06:12.080 --> 0:06:15.360
<v Speaker 1>talked about multiverses and many times on this podcast. But

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:17.280
<v Speaker 1>this is sort of like a different take. Instead of

0:06:17.360 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 1>imagining the universe is actually many universes all sort of

0:06:20.760 --> 0:06:23.920
<v Speaker 1>rolled up into one grand idea, this is like maybe

0:06:23.960 --> 0:06:26.880
<v Speaker 1>our universe is in competition with other universes on some

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:30.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of like meta universe playing field. WHOA like an

0:06:31.040 --> 0:06:34.320
<v Speaker 1>African savannah but for universes. And then there's some kind

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:38.000
<v Speaker 1>of predator, some universe predator, some universe eating. I think

0:06:38.040 --> 0:06:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I saw that on an episode of the new show

0:06:39.920 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Look what can eat an entire universe? Exactly right, and

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 1>so maybe Marvel got it right. As usual, they can

0:06:46.440 --> 0:06:49.240
<v Speaker 1>do no wrong. Well, this is a kind of a

0:06:49.400 --> 0:06:52.320
<v Speaker 1>mind bogging question, big ideas here, and so we were

0:06:52.360 --> 0:06:54.880
<v Speaker 1>wondering how many people out there had thought about the

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:58.400
<v Speaker 1>universe as evolving and or as being the result of

0:06:58.600 --> 0:07:01.600
<v Speaker 1>something like natural select. So Daniel went out there as

0:07:01.680 --> 0:07:04.080
<v Speaker 1>usual and ask people on the internet what they thought

0:07:04.120 --> 0:07:06.000
<v Speaker 1>of this question. That's right, and so thank you to

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 1>everybody who's willing to entertain my crazy questions without the

0:07:09.640 --> 0:07:12.920
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to think about it or to prepare. If you'd

0:07:13.000 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 1>like to participate for a future episode, we would love

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:17.840
<v Speaker 1>to hear your voice on the podcast. Just to write

0:07:17.920 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 1>us an email, no special equipment required. Shoot us an

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:24.160
<v Speaker 1>email two questions at Daniel and Jorge dot com. So

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 1>think about it for a second. If someone asked you

0:07:26.560 --> 0:07:31.360
<v Speaker 1>what is cosmological natural selection? What would come to mind

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:34.640
<v Speaker 1>in your brain? Here's what people had to say. I'm

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:41.320
<v Speaker 1>gonna say those bodies orbiting around a star that have

0:07:41.720 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 1>the most stable gravitational orbits last the longest. Every star

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:51.240
<v Speaker 1>for itself, may the strongest in the universe survive and

0:07:51.360 --> 0:07:55.400
<v Speaker 1>the weakest universal objects becomes space test well, I guess

0:07:55.680 --> 0:07:59.840
<v Speaker 1>planet stars, gallessies, etcetera. Survival of the fittest would apply

0:08:00.120 --> 0:08:06.920
<v Speaker 1>to another star is more likely to pass on positive traits.

0:08:07.720 --> 0:08:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Does that have an influence on the next generation stars.

0:08:10.760 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>Maybe it's a theory that explains why there are no

0:08:13.200 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 1>medium sized black holes by using an analogy from evolution.

0:08:17.080 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 1>Maybe there were some conditions in the environment that made

0:08:19.800 --> 0:08:22.960
<v Speaker 1>them go extinct, while the supermassive black holes with you

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:26.160
<v Speaker 1>today lived on and appropriated. Assuming that's the thing they

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 1>can do, all right. Nobody said in African Savannah with

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the universes, nobody talked about something eating universes. It's a

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:38.199
<v Speaker 1>pretty crazy idea to encapsulate in just three words, cosmological

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:40.400
<v Speaker 1>natural selection. So we didn't give them a whole lot

0:08:40.480 --> 0:08:42.920
<v Speaker 1>to go on. It seems like people didn't trigger something

0:08:43.000 --> 0:08:45.200
<v Speaker 1>big in their heads. Like most people stuck to stars

0:08:45.280 --> 0:08:48.839
<v Speaker 1>or galaxies as maybe evolving, but nobody thought about the

0:08:48.960 --> 0:08:52.200
<v Speaker 1>universe evolving. It's sort of too crazy, you know, it's

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:54.599
<v Speaker 1>sort of too big an idea to even leap to

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:57.199
<v Speaker 1>from this concept. It's sort of bold. But you know,

0:08:57.280 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 1>I like that. I like that about bold ideas. Like

0:08:59.840 --> 0:09:02.360
<v Speaker 1>for as you hear about someing, you think, what, that's great.

0:09:02.520 --> 0:09:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Hold on a second, maybe that makes a little bit

0:09:04.640 --> 0:09:07.600
<v Speaker 1>of sense. That's the nice thing about crazy, big ideas.

0:09:07.880 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 1>I guess. You know, even ideas like the multiverse, at

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:13.599
<v Speaker 1>some point, you know, seem crazy and insane, and but

0:09:13.720 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 1>now people seem to kind of accept it, and some

0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 1>people even assume it's true, like people like Marvel. That

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:23.600
<v Speaker 1>you can't necessarily turn that around. Just because some ideas

0:09:23.640 --> 0:09:26.120
<v Speaker 1>which now make a lot of sense once seemed crazy

0:09:26.480 --> 0:09:29.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that every crazy seeming idea will eventually make sense,

0:09:30.040 --> 0:09:33.320
<v Speaker 1>right right, right. Sense only works one way, It only

0:09:33.360 --> 0:09:35.559
<v Speaker 1>makes sense, it makes sense one way. There are a

0:09:35.559 --> 0:09:37.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of crazy seeming ideas that we don't talk about

0:09:37.640 --> 0:09:40.840
<v Speaker 1>it anymore because they still seem crazy right the whole,

0:09:40.920 --> 0:09:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Like the universe is like turtles and turtles all the

0:09:44.440 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>way down on top of some elephants or something that

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:52.040
<v Speaker 1>also seemed bonkers. But that doesn't mean it's true. Yeah, exactly,

0:09:52.120 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 1>it's gotta have some legs, it's got to solve some problems,

0:09:54.800 --> 0:09:57.160
<v Speaker 1>it's got to open up avenues for exploration, and it's

0:09:57.160 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 1>got to sort of hang together mathematically. Well, I mean,

0:10:00.120 --> 0:10:02.920
<v Speaker 1>turtles do solve all problems you think about it, and

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 1>they have legs and they do have legs. Yeah, although

0:10:05.600 --> 0:10:07.600
<v Speaker 1>they do it kind of slowly, so I mean we're

0:10:07.640 --> 0:10:09.760
<v Speaker 1>still waiting for those turtles. All right, Well, to step

0:10:09.880 --> 0:10:11.920
<v Speaker 1>us through this, Daniel, this big idea, what is the

0:10:12.000 --> 0:10:16.720
<v Speaker 1>cosmological natural selection? So cosmological natural selection is a really

0:10:16.800 --> 0:10:20.800
<v Speaker 1>fun creative idea by a physicist named Lee Smollen, a

0:10:21.000 --> 0:10:25.680
<v Speaker 1>theoretical physicist, and it's in solution to what physics calls

0:10:25.800 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 1>a fine tuning problem, which is just a fancy way

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 1>of saying, like, why is the universe the way that

0:10:31.480 --> 0:10:33.920
<v Speaker 1>it is, because it seems like it could have been

0:10:34.040 --> 0:10:37.400
<v Speaker 1>lots of other ways. So before we dig into how

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 1>he tries to answer that question, let's make sure we

0:10:40.240 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 1>have like a good grasp on what the question is.

0:10:42.480 --> 0:10:44.520
<v Speaker 1>What is the problem we're trying to solve. Why is

0:10:44.559 --> 0:10:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the tricky to understand that the universe is this way

0:10:46.840 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 1>and not some other way? Right? Because you know, as physicist,

0:10:49.760 --> 0:10:52.000
<v Speaker 1>you've been sort of drilling down on the equations that

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 1>make the universe work, and at some point you come

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 1>upon something that you're like, you can't explain, like it

0:10:57.280 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 1>just seems to be the way it is, because it

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:01.640
<v Speaker 1>seems to be the way it is, Like you can't

0:11:01.640 --> 0:11:04.599
<v Speaker 1>really explain why pious three point one four or the

0:11:04.760 --> 0:11:08.719
<v Speaker 1>cosmological constant is is X. Right, that's exactly right. You know.

0:11:08.800 --> 0:11:12.400
<v Speaker 1>The grand goal of physics is to summarize everything we see,

0:11:12.440 --> 0:11:16.000
<v Speaker 1>all phenomena, all matter, all energy, all forces in terms

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:19.520
<v Speaker 1>of one concept, you know, like maybe a single equation

0:11:19.640 --> 0:11:21.559
<v Speaker 1>that we could write onto a T shirt. And so

0:11:21.679 --> 0:11:23.599
<v Speaker 1>we've made a lot of progress there. We have a

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:26.200
<v Speaker 1>few equations. They don't quite fit onto a T shirt,

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:28.480
<v Speaker 1>but they're kind of beautiful and compact, and you know,

0:11:28.559 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 1>they describe a portion of the universe that we understand

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 1>that we've explored. Well, it depends on the size of

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:36.120
<v Speaker 1>your your T shirt. Just get a bigger T shirt,

0:11:36.120 --> 0:11:38.319
<v Speaker 1>Like I said, just adjust your expectations of what a

0:11:38.440 --> 0:11:41.920
<v Speaker 1>T shirt uh is or how many people can fit in.

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:44.719
<v Speaker 1>It might solve your problem. That's right. If we go

0:11:44.800 --> 0:11:46.880
<v Speaker 1>to micro font and then it's no problem. We can

0:11:46.920 --> 0:11:49.679
<v Speaker 1>describe the whole universe on a T shirt. But currently

0:11:49.679 --> 0:11:52.079
<v Speaker 1>we have this model of particles and their interactions. We

0:11:52.160 --> 0:11:54.320
<v Speaker 1>call it the standard model, and as you say, there

0:11:54.320 --> 0:11:56.719
<v Speaker 1>are parts of it that we don't understand, you know,

0:11:56.800 --> 0:11:58.840
<v Speaker 1>not just the structure, but there's lots of questions about

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:01.280
<v Speaker 1>the structure of you know, like why are their copies

0:12:01.320 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 1>of these particles electron, Muan, Tau, but also just we

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:08.199
<v Speaker 1>find numbers in these equations, and those numbers have no

0:12:08.440 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 1>explanation that we can find. They are just numbers, and

0:12:11.520 --> 0:12:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the theory doesn't tell us what those numbers have to be.

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 1>We have to go out and measure them. One of

0:12:15.960 --> 0:12:18.800
<v Speaker 1>these numbers, for example, as you say, is the cosmological constant,

0:12:19.040 --> 0:12:21.800
<v Speaker 1>this rate at which the universe seems to be expanding.

0:12:22.200 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 1>We don't know why that number is what it is.

0:12:24.360 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 1>We have no theoretical prediction for what it should be.

0:12:27.080 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>It's just like a placeholder, like a parameter. It's sort

0:12:29.920 --> 0:12:32.640
<v Speaker 1>of like you're in the control panel for the universe

0:12:32.720 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 1>and it just has these knobs. You know. The structure

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:37.320
<v Speaker 1>of the universe is this control panel, and you could

0:12:37.400 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 1>turn the values of these parameters up or down and

0:12:40.120 --> 0:12:43.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe get different universes that follow the same basic laws

0:12:43.559 --> 0:12:46.880
<v Speaker 1>of physics. But you know, with different settings on those knobs, right,

0:12:46.920 --> 0:12:49.439
<v Speaker 1>they seem like arbitrary, like somebody came in before you

0:12:49.640 --> 0:12:51.959
<v Speaker 1>and adjusted to those dials, and then you came in

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:54.680
<v Speaker 1>and you're like, why did you set these dials? Yes, exactly,

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:56.880
<v Speaker 1>we have no explanation and for why these numbers are

0:12:56.960 --> 0:12:58.760
<v Speaker 1>where they are. And you might be tempted to think

0:12:58.760 --> 0:13:01.400
<v Speaker 1>about numbers like this speed of light because we don't

0:13:01.440 --> 0:13:03.720
<v Speaker 1>know why the speed of light is the speed of light,

0:13:03.840 --> 0:13:06.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, why isn't it not faster or slower. It's

0:13:06.320 --> 0:13:09.080
<v Speaker 1>a little tricky because the speed of light has units

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:11.960
<v Speaker 1>on it, right, it's meters per second. So the actual

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 1>number there depends on the units you choose. If you

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:17.040
<v Speaker 1>change the meter or change the second, you get a

0:13:17.080 --> 0:13:20.800
<v Speaker 1>different number. So physicists like to focus on dimensionless numbers.

0:13:20.840 --> 0:13:23.959
<v Speaker 1>You can rearrange all these constants of the universe in

0:13:24.160 --> 0:13:26.160
<v Speaker 1>ratios and whatever to get rid of the units in

0:13:26.320 --> 0:13:29.800
<v Speaker 1>unit with pure numbers numbers that just are. And you know,

0:13:29.920 --> 0:13:32.679
<v Speaker 1>if all those numbers were one, we'd be like, cool,

0:13:33.000 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>that makes sense. Where if all those numbers were ten

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:37.440
<v Speaker 1>or something, it would make sense. But they're all really different.

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:39.000
<v Speaker 1>Some of them are really small, some of them are

0:13:39.080 --> 0:13:41.640
<v Speaker 1>really large, and we just have no explanation for them. So,

0:13:41.760 --> 0:13:44.600
<v Speaker 1>as you say, they seem kind of arbitrary, and we wonder,

0:13:44.720 --> 0:13:47.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, like could they be different? Could you have

0:13:47.440 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 1>had another universe with different values of those numbers? And

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:51.920
<v Speaker 1>we think through like what the physics could be like.

0:13:52.320 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 1>But the physics would be really really different in the

0:13:54.360 --> 0:13:56.760
<v Speaker 1>universe would be totally different from the one we see.

0:13:57.320 --> 0:14:00.079
<v Speaker 1>And so we wonder, like, why are these values what

0:14:00.280 --> 0:14:02.240
<v Speaker 1>they are? They seem to be sort of just right

0:14:02.440 --> 0:14:05.000
<v Speaker 1>to give us the universe that we have. So these

0:14:05.040 --> 0:14:08.320
<v Speaker 1>are like ratios, I imagine it would be like saying,

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:10.679
<v Speaker 1>what is the rate at which the universe is expanding?

0:14:10.760 --> 0:14:14.000
<v Speaker 1>It's like, you know, there's seven point four seven percent

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:17.040
<v Speaker 1>and so that's that's a dimensionless constant to write a percentage.

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 1>So is that what you mean? Like ratios of like

0:14:18.920 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the number of so and so particles through so and

0:14:21.760 --> 0:14:24.360
<v Speaker 1>so other particles. Yeah, that kind of thing. So one

0:14:24.400 --> 0:14:26.840
<v Speaker 1>of the most important dimensionless constant is called the fine

0:14:26.880 --> 0:14:29.920
<v Speaker 1>structure constant. It includes the speed of light and the

0:14:30.080 --> 0:14:33.440
<v Speaker 1>charge of the electron and planks constant. And if you

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 1>change that number, then physics changes because that affects like

0:14:36.600 --> 0:14:39.280
<v Speaker 1>how strongly. Electrons and pausit trying to repel each other,

0:14:39.440 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 1>and you know the distances at which things feel these

0:14:42.400 --> 0:14:45.360
<v Speaker 1>kinds of forces. Other important ones are ratios of the

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:48.240
<v Speaker 1>masses of the particles, like why is the muan so

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 1>much heavier than the electron? Why is the top corks

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 1>so much heavier than everything else? You know, if you

0:14:54.240 --> 0:14:57.280
<v Speaker 1>change those numbers, you also really change how physics work,

0:14:57.720 --> 0:14:59.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, like what if the electron wasn't the light

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:02.200
<v Speaker 1>just leapt on? What if we had muans in our

0:15:02.480 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 1>bodies instead of electrons because muans were lighter mass, Like

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:08.360
<v Speaker 1>that would really change everything, right, But you're you're really

0:15:08.400 --> 0:15:10.880
<v Speaker 1>sort of asking two questions, right, aren't you. Like you're asking,

0:15:11.080 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 1>for example, in the case of the electron, like what

0:15:13.240 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 1>is the mass of the electron the way it is?

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:19.120
<v Speaker 1>And also why is the mass of the other cousins

0:15:19.200 --> 0:15:22.240
<v Speaker 1>of the electron you know a certain number of times

0:15:22.280 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 1>dead mass with the electron? Yeah, exactly. And so there's

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:26.600
<v Speaker 1>lots of different ways you're going to arrange these things.

0:15:26.640 --> 0:15:29.400
<v Speaker 1>But fundamentally, we're looking at a set of numbers, and

0:15:29.520 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 1>those numbers control the way the universe is, and we

0:15:32.640 --> 0:15:36.320
<v Speaker 1>don't know why those numbers are what they are, and

0:15:36.640 --> 0:15:39.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, as you said earlier, one possible explanation is,

0:15:39.680 --> 0:15:42.000
<v Speaker 1>we know if those numbers were different, who would be

0:15:42.160 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 1>here asking that question? And that's a popular answer, and

0:15:46.080 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 1>it goes by the name of the anthropic principle. It

0:15:48.560 --> 0:15:50.960
<v Speaker 1>just says that if the numbers were different, you wouldn't

0:15:50.960 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 1>get humans and you wouldn't get intelligence, and nobody would

0:15:53.240 --> 0:15:56.240
<v Speaker 1>be asking. So only in a universe where things happen

0:15:56.320 --> 0:15:58.160
<v Speaker 1>to work in just this way do you have people

0:15:58.240 --> 0:16:00.120
<v Speaker 1>to ask that question? So you want to ask that

0:16:00.280 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 1>question when it's possible, And that's sort of like a

0:16:03.200 --> 0:16:05.560
<v Speaker 1>circular explanation, but a lot of people like that answer.

0:16:05.800 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>Sort of like my kids asking why is our house

0:16:07.720 --> 0:16:10.320
<v Speaker 1>designed that way? It's like they are just born into

0:16:10.360 --> 0:16:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the house. Been born in a different house, they would

0:16:12.720 --> 0:16:15.600
<v Speaker 1>be asking a different question about that house. Yeah. Or

0:16:15.680 --> 0:16:18.200
<v Speaker 1>it's like kids asking, you know, why am I here?

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:21.560
<v Speaker 1>Why was I created? And not some other kid? You know, like, well,

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:23.400
<v Speaker 1>if I had had a different kid, because you know,

0:16:23.480 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 1>you've been conceived in a different moment, that kid might

0:16:25.880 --> 0:16:28.520
<v Speaker 1>be asking the same question, or you know, have different

0:16:28.560 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 1>interests or whatever, ask a different question. Right, Basically, you

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:35.360
<v Speaker 1>want to tell your kids they're not special. Of course,

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:39.480
<v Speaker 1>my kids are special. Everybody else kids I don't know about. Yeah,

0:16:39.480 --> 0:16:43.640
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like anthropic parenting. And my complaint with this

0:16:44.200 --> 0:16:46.120
<v Speaker 1>is that it's sort of like giving up. It's sort

0:16:46.160 --> 0:16:49.320
<v Speaker 1>of like saying there is no explanation, look no further,

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:52.560
<v Speaker 1>Whereas what I like in science is when you're always

0:16:52.600 --> 0:16:55.040
<v Speaker 1>trying to dig deeper. You're always saying, there must be

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 1>a reason for this to happen. Let's look deeper, because

0:16:57.720 --> 0:17:00.680
<v Speaker 1>it's possible that there is a deeper sir. Right, We

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 1>certainly don't have the final theory of physics. We know

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 1>that our description of particles and their interactions is flawed

0:17:07.320 --> 0:17:09.600
<v Speaker 1>and limited, because we know, for example, it breaks down

0:17:09.720 --> 0:17:12.119
<v Speaker 1>if you have really really high energies. Our theory just

0:17:12.320 --> 0:17:14.880
<v Speaker 1>doesn't work. And so we know we need some sort

0:17:14.880 --> 0:17:17.320
<v Speaker 1>of deeper theory. And so maybe you know there is

0:17:17.359 --> 0:17:19.760
<v Speaker 1>some deeper explanation one we just haven't found yet, that

0:17:19.880 --> 0:17:22.639
<v Speaker 1>explains these values and says these values have to be

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:26.480
<v Speaker 1>certain numbers, like, there's not arbitrary. It only works if

0:17:26.520 --> 0:17:28.720
<v Speaker 1>they are these numbers. We just don't quite see the

0:17:28.760 --> 0:17:31.560
<v Speaker 1>full picture yet, And so I don't like the entropic answer,

0:17:31.600 --> 0:17:34.399
<v Speaker 1>because I always want to strive for that deeper understanding, right,

0:17:34.440 --> 0:17:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Like maybe you'll dig deeper into the equations and find

0:17:37.440 --> 0:17:39.200
<v Speaker 1>that if the electron had half the mass that it

0:17:39.280 --> 0:17:42.080
<v Speaker 1>does right now, it just doesn't make for a logical

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:45.000
<v Speaker 1>universe or like a universe dead. You know, it gives

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:47.479
<v Speaker 1>you tupiles to equal seven, Like that's what you want.

0:17:47.520 --> 0:17:49.720
<v Speaker 1>You wanted to boil it down to one question and say, look,

0:17:49.760 --> 0:17:53.119
<v Speaker 1>if you change this, then you wouldn't it wouldn't logically work, right,

0:17:53.119 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 1>because that's kind of the only alternative when you say,

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:57.200
<v Speaker 1>like it's think things have to be a certain way,

0:17:57.640 --> 0:17:59.959
<v Speaker 1>like not being able to be a certain way mean

0:18:00.200 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 1>that it would be illogical. Yeah, And people are looking

0:18:03.400 --> 0:18:06.159
<v Speaker 1>for a theory of the universe that's self consistent, right,

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:09.480
<v Speaker 1>So the sort of philosophical implication there is that only

0:18:09.600 --> 0:18:13.879
<v Speaker 1>self consistent universes can exist. And so maybe there's a

0:18:13.960 --> 0:18:16.800
<v Speaker 1>reason why those other values of those numbers make for

0:18:16.880 --> 0:18:20.080
<v Speaker 1>some inconsistency, and there you need to have some sort

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:23.480
<v Speaker 1>of physics principle we haven't yet discovered, right that shows

0:18:23.560 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 1>us why those things would be inconsistent, you know, And

0:18:26.440 --> 0:18:28.200
<v Speaker 1>we don't have that, but we can sketch the sort

0:18:28.240 --> 0:18:31.359
<v Speaker 1>of like rough idea. You know, maybe for example, string

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:34.480
<v Speaker 1>theory is correct, and at the basic level the universe

0:18:34.560 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 1>are these little, tiny vibrating strings and they can only

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:41.320
<v Speaker 1>vibrate in certain ways and because of their basic fundamental nature,

0:18:41.440 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 1>and that leads to certain properties that we then measure,

0:18:44.240 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, at our scale, which have to come out

0:18:46.280 --> 0:18:48.399
<v Speaker 1>this certain way, and that you just can't have an

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:50.840
<v Speaker 1>electron with a different charge, and you can't have them

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:53.480
<v Speaker 1>you want with four times as much mass as the electron.

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:55.479
<v Speaker 1>You have to have the numbers that we have now,

0:18:56.000 --> 0:18:58.240
<v Speaker 1>and it comes out of some deeper logic that we

0:18:58.359 --> 0:19:00.479
<v Speaker 1>just don't know yet. So we don't have that theory yet,

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 1>but you know, you can imagine that kind of theory existing, right.

0:19:03.640 --> 0:19:05.880
<v Speaker 1>But that is still satisfy you though as a physicist,

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:07.639
<v Speaker 1>like did you say, Well, that's just the way the

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:10.119
<v Speaker 1>universe is, and it has to be that way because

0:19:10.160 --> 0:19:12.639
<v Speaker 1>of the way the universe is. I'll never be satisfied,

0:19:12.920 --> 0:19:15.639
<v Speaker 1>absolutely not when we get that answer that explains all

0:19:15.640 --> 0:19:17.879
<v Speaker 1>the mysteries we see today. There will just always be

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:19.920
<v Speaker 1>more questions. And that's what I don't like about the

0:19:19.960 --> 0:19:22.640
<v Speaker 1>anthropic principle because it stops you from asking that next

0:19:22.760 --> 0:19:24.920
<v Speaker 1>round of questions, whereas I feel like science is this

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:27.760
<v Speaker 1>cycle of digging every deeper into the most basic questions.

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 1>And you know, even if we exhaust physics and we

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 1>get just one single theory that describes the whole universe,

0:19:33.160 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 1>will always have philosophy because we can always ask like, well,

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:39.480
<v Speaker 1>what does it mean? Man? What does it mean? And

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 1>that's one potential way to answer why the universe is

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:44.800
<v Speaker 1>the way it is, Why those numbers are all the

0:19:44.880 --> 0:19:47.440
<v Speaker 1>way that the numbers that they are. Maybe there's some

0:19:47.600 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 1>asked yet to be discovered, you know, equation or theory

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 1>that explains them all that makes them want to be

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:55.119
<v Speaker 1>those numbers or makes them have to be those numbers.

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:58.640
<v Speaker 1>But then there's another theory about what could explain them, right, Yeah,

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:00.880
<v Speaker 1>And another way to approach this problem is to say,

0:20:01.440 --> 0:20:06.119
<v Speaker 1>maybe the values aren't arbitrary, maybe they are random, Like

0:20:06.760 --> 0:20:10.400
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's possible to have different universes with different values,

0:20:10.600 --> 0:20:13.679
<v Speaker 1>and all the universes would all the different values exist.

0:20:14.280 --> 0:20:17.199
<v Speaker 1>This is the multiverse explanation to say that maybe all

0:20:17.200 --> 0:20:19.960
<v Speaker 1>those possible universes are out there with these different values

0:20:20.000 --> 0:20:22.840
<v Speaker 1>of the parameters, and there's different physics in each one,

0:20:23.000 --> 0:20:24.720
<v Speaker 1>and this just happens to be the one that we

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:27.400
<v Speaker 1>are in, right. It's like you walk into a control room.

0:20:27.440 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 1>You see all the knobs turning to a certain number

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:31.200
<v Speaker 1>for all the values of the universe, and you're like,

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:33.160
<v Speaker 1>why are they like this? And the answer is sort

0:20:33.200 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 1>of like, well, that's because there's another control room next

0:20:36.119 --> 0:20:38.160
<v Speaker 1>to you with the value said a little bit different,

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:40.480
<v Speaker 1>and next to that one is another control with the

0:20:40.520 --> 0:20:43.680
<v Speaker 1>value said a little bit different at up to infinity.

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:46.680
<v Speaker 1>That's sort of an explanation, and it doesn't answer questions like,

0:20:46.840 --> 0:20:49.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, well, who chooses those values? Or is it

0:20:49.400 --> 0:20:52.440
<v Speaker 1>truly random like quantum mechanically random, or is it like

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:56.399
<v Speaker 1>systematic where you get one universe for every possible value?

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:58.680
<v Speaker 1>Are there an infinite number of them? There's so many

0:20:58.760 --> 0:21:02.120
<v Speaker 1>questions opened up by that, and unfortunately, it's pretty difficult

0:21:02.160 --> 0:21:04.240
<v Speaker 1>to probe that kind of theory, like where do you

0:21:04.320 --> 0:21:07.000
<v Speaker 1>go from here? You know, if those universes exist or not?

0:21:07.240 --> 0:21:09.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, can we ever discover them? No? Can we

0:21:09.800 --> 0:21:13.000
<v Speaker 1>interact with them? No? So can we prove fundamentally that

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 1>they exist? Folks like Sean Carroll would argue that you

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 1>can sort of implicitly prove they exist if you demonstrate

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:23.440
<v Speaker 1>that it's the only way to make sense of the universe,

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 1>that our theory of physics requires that they exist, and

0:21:27.440 --> 0:21:30.280
<v Speaker 1>it's the only theory that you can develop. It's a

0:21:30.359 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 1>bit weaker than actually finding them and exploring them. But

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:36.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's an argument to suggest that the multiverse

0:21:36.359 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 1>might be real because I guess that would sort of

0:21:38.760 --> 0:21:40.520
<v Speaker 1>explain why we have the one we have is that

0:21:40.640 --> 0:21:43.280
<v Speaker 1>it's just like a random role to die, although you

0:21:43.520 --> 0:21:46.159
<v Speaker 1>could you make the argument that you know, the universe

0:21:46.240 --> 0:21:48.399
<v Speaker 1>only role to die ones like does it have to

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 1>roll to die an infinite number of times? It's a

0:21:50.560 --> 0:21:52.600
<v Speaker 1>great question and one it's hard to probe. But what

0:21:52.760 --> 0:21:54.600
<v Speaker 1>we can do is look at the numbers that we

0:21:54.720 --> 0:21:58.280
<v Speaker 1>have and ask are they likely? Is this a likely arrangement?

0:21:58.600 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 1>And here we're get into really fuzzy territory. But physicist

0:22:01.640 --> 0:22:03.600
<v Speaker 1>look at the numbers we have and they feel weird

0:22:03.680 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 1>about them. They're like, the cosmological constant is very small,

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:10.440
<v Speaker 1>and these other numbers seem kind of large, and why

0:22:10.560 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 1>is gravity so so weak? And you know why all

0:22:13.080 --> 0:22:15.719
<v Speaker 1>the forces have such a different strengths, And they make

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:18.879
<v Speaker 1>these really handwavy arguments that suggest that the numbers we

0:22:19.000 --> 0:22:23.960
<v Speaker 1>have are somehow improbable or unnatural, and it's more likely

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:25.920
<v Speaker 1>to get a different set of values, and that makes

0:22:25.960 --> 0:22:28.879
<v Speaker 1>our universe seems sort of like weird on this like

0:22:29.280 --> 0:22:32.720
<v Speaker 1>multiverse landscape. And I don't know if that's an argument

0:22:32.800 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 1>against the multiverse exactly, but it suggests that you might

0:22:35.600 --> 0:22:38.200
<v Speaker 1>need some sort of mechanism to explain why we have

0:22:38.440 --> 0:22:41.360
<v Speaker 1>these numbers. And if this is the only one, then

0:22:41.440 --> 0:22:44.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, the universe are really unlucky or lucky, depending

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:46.720
<v Speaker 1>on your point of view. I think that the universe

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 1>is totally lucky to have us, at least you, Daniel.

0:22:48.880 --> 0:22:51.360
<v Speaker 1>At least we're lucky to have you. All right, Well,

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:53.560
<v Speaker 1>we have this big question about why the universe is

0:22:53.560 --> 0:22:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the way it is. There are some theories, but they

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:58.119
<v Speaker 1>are a little bit unsatisfying, and so there's sort of

0:22:58.240 --> 0:23:02.040
<v Speaker 1>a new or emerging idea that's is really interesting and

0:23:02.240 --> 0:23:05.040
<v Speaker 1>it's all about evolution. So let's get into that. But

0:23:05.160 --> 0:23:19.920
<v Speaker 1>first let's take a quick break. All right, Daniel, what

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:23.160
<v Speaker 1>does it all mean? Man? Why are we here? Why

0:23:23.280 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 1>is the universe way it is? What does it seem

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:27.359
<v Speaker 1>so suited to us? For us to be comfortable in

0:23:27.440 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 1>our houses. Here having a conversation about the way it works. Yeah, exactly.

0:23:31.880 --> 0:23:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we are just the beaks of those birds, perfectly

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:38.400
<v Speaker 1>evolved to fit into the trees and grab out those grubs.

0:23:38.960 --> 0:23:41.440
<v Speaker 1>And you know, that's the inspiration, is that we see

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 1>in biology that it's not random that animals are well

0:23:45.160 --> 0:23:48.320
<v Speaker 1>suited to their environments, that they're very fine tuned, right,

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:51.200
<v Speaker 1>And they're fine tuned for a reason. There's a mechanism there.

0:23:51.400 --> 0:23:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Natural selection operates by enhancing those that are well suited

0:23:55.800 --> 0:23:57.680
<v Speaker 1>right and killing off those that are not, And so

0:23:57.800 --> 0:24:00.639
<v Speaker 1>you're more likely to end up with ers that are

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:03.719
<v Speaker 1>well suited to the environment. So the environment then shapes

0:24:03.800 --> 0:24:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the nature of the critters. And so the idea was,

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:09.480
<v Speaker 1>take that and can we use that to explain sort

0:24:09.520 --> 0:24:11.840
<v Speaker 1>of how we find the universe to be fine tuned?

0:24:11.920 --> 0:24:14.399
<v Speaker 1>Is there some mechanism we can use to explain how

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the universe itself selected these values? So in this analogy,

0:24:19.400 --> 0:24:21.480
<v Speaker 1>in this idea to explain why the universe is the

0:24:21.520 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 1>way it is, somehow like the universe has been evolving

0:24:25.640 --> 0:24:28.879
<v Speaker 1>in some environment and it's sort of arranged itself or

0:24:28.960 --> 0:24:31.160
<v Speaker 1>it came to be the way it is now because

0:24:31.200 --> 0:24:35.160
<v Speaker 1>of some natural selection process that that's kind of the idea, right, Yeah,

0:24:35.320 --> 0:24:39.080
<v Speaker 1>But it's not being selected for us or for physics

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:42.639
<v Speaker 1>that makes sense, or for physicists or for cartoonists. Is

0:24:42.800 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 1>being selected for universes with lots of black holes in it? What? Yeah?

0:24:49.200 --> 0:24:53.240
<v Speaker 1>So the basic idea is maybe universes can give birth

0:24:53.359 --> 0:24:57.959
<v Speaker 1>to other universes by creating new universes inside their black holes,

0:24:58.440 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 1>and that would tend to give you lots of universes

0:25:01.440 --> 0:25:03.520
<v Speaker 1>that have lots of black holes in them. You would

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 1>ended with more universes that have lots of black holes

0:25:06.520 --> 0:25:09.359
<v Speaker 1>than universes that don't have lots of black holes. And

0:25:09.400 --> 0:25:12.200
<v Speaker 1>so maybe our universe is fine tuned to have the

0:25:12.359 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 1>sets of parameters you would need to give you universes

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:19.119
<v Speaker 1>with lots of black holes. WHOA, Okay, I feel like

0:25:19.160 --> 0:25:21.440
<v Speaker 1>you just introduce a lot of crazy ideas here, Like,

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:24.480
<v Speaker 1>first of all, like universe giving birth to other universes,

0:25:24.720 --> 0:25:29.920
<v Speaker 1>don't you need to universes? Is this a mono biological birth?

0:25:30.040 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 1>What do you call those animals that can just split

0:25:32.920 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 1>off and just butt off? A sexual reproduction? Yes, that's right, yes? Right?

0:25:37.960 --> 0:25:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Is the universe a sexual Yeah? It could be that

0:25:40.320 --> 0:25:43.320
<v Speaker 1>universe is reproduce in lots of different ways. We're open

0:25:43.359 --> 0:25:46.600
<v Speaker 1>minded on this podcast, but the idea is not totally bonkers.

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:49.880
<v Speaker 1>It comes from the recognition that there's a connection between

0:25:50.359 --> 0:25:53.280
<v Speaker 1>what happens inside a black hole and what happens at

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of our universe, and that connection is a singularity. Right.

0:25:57.600 --> 0:26:00.680
<v Speaker 1>We know that our universe started with a singularity that's

0:26:00.720 --> 0:26:03.959
<v Speaker 1>this crazy dense moment when the universe is like infinitely

0:26:04.119 --> 0:26:06.679
<v Speaker 1>dense and then expanded out really rapid that we call

0:26:06.760 --> 0:26:08.399
<v Speaker 1>that the Big Bang. And we know that there's a

0:26:08.520 --> 0:26:11.760
<v Speaker 1>singularity at the heart of black holes, or we think

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:15.240
<v Speaker 1>there is according to general relativity. And so this idea says, like,

0:26:15.480 --> 0:26:18.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe every singularity at the heart of a black hole

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:22.440
<v Speaker 1>is actually a singularity to create a new universe. WHOA,

0:26:23.440 --> 0:26:25.040
<v Speaker 1>But then I guess. So then the idea is that

0:26:25.119 --> 0:26:27.920
<v Speaker 1>the universe that is created inside of a black hole

0:26:28.040 --> 0:26:30.280
<v Speaker 1>exists within the black hole, or does it grow out

0:26:30.359 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 1>and take over its parent universe exists within the black hole.

0:26:34.359 --> 0:26:37.240
<v Speaker 1>So the idea is that instead of imagining inside a

0:26:37.280 --> 0:26:40.159
<v Speaker 1>black hole, you have like a dead singularity that's just

0:26:40.280 --> 0:26:43.400
<v Speaker 1>like super dense point that instead you have something dynamic

0:26:43.880 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 1>that it's a bounce instead of like just to collapse

0:26:46.560 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 1>into a singularity that matter collapses, you get this moment

0:26:50.160 --> 0:26:53.399
<v Speaker 1>of great density, and then you get a new expanding

0:26:53.480 --> 0:26:56.919
<v Speaker 1>region of space time within the black hole and never escapes.

0:26:57.080 --> 0:26:59.160
<v Speaker 1>You can't see it from the outside of the black hole,

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:02.480
<v Speaker 1>but that maybe inside black holes we have this region

0:27:02.560 --> 0:27:06.240
<v Speaker 1>of expanding space time began with the singularity of infinite density,

0:27:06.600 --> 0:27:09.119
<v Speaker 1>just like our universe, and so it's sort of like

0:27:09.359 --> 0:27:12.159
<v Speaker 1>this bounce moment where it collapses into a singularity and

0:27:12.200 --> 0:27:15.680
<v Speaker 1>then starts expanding out again, expanding but still inside of

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the black hole, still inside the it's like a little

0:27:18.800 --> 0:27:21.639
<v Speaker 1>bubble inside of the black hole of regular space. And

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 1>this sort of connects to an idea we talked about

0:27:23.640 --> 0:27:26.600
<v Speaker 1>recently about whether black holes actually are black holes, and

0:27:26.680 --> 0:27:29.199
<v Speaker 1>we talked about how these objects, whatever they are, are

0:27:29.240 --> 0:27:32.240
<v Speaker 1>in regions of very warped space time, which means that

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:35.639
<v Speaker 1>their time slows down dramatically. So when you're looking at

0:27:35.640 --> 0:27:37.879
<v Speaker 1>a black hole, instead of looking at something which is

0:27:37.920 --> 0:27:40.120
<v Speaker 1>sort of like a dead singularity, you might be looking

0:27:40.160 --> 0:27:42.920
<v Speaker 1>at something dynamic which is collapsing and then going to

0:27:43.000 --> 0:27:46.080
<v Speaker 1>bounce back. But it's just super duper slowed down, so

0:27:46.240 --> 0:27:49.120
<v Speaker 1>that what takes micro seconds and its time takes billions

0:27:49.200 --> 0:27:51.440
<v Speaker 1>or trillions of years for us. So this is sort

0:27:51.440 --> 0:27:53.719
<v Speaker 1>of a similar idea to say, maybe black holes are

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 1>not just like static little dense objects collecting more mass,

0:27:57.359 --> 0:27:59.440
<v Speaker 1>but there are this bounce where you come to a

0:27:59.680 --> 0:28:03.440
<v Speaker 1>point a great density and then start expanding out into effectively,

0:28:03.480 --> 0:28:07.520
<v Speaker 1>what's a new universe inside each black hole? WHOA, But

0:28:07.640 --> 0:28:11.600
<v Speaker 1>then wouldn't that mean that each universe is like bounded

0:28:11.720 --> 0:28:14.040
<v Speaker 1>or finite, you know, like it has a limited amount

0:28:14.040 --> 0:28:16.560
<v Speaker 1>of energy to it, whereas you know, it seems like

0:28:16.640 --> 0:28:19.440
<v Speaker 1>our universe has almost it looks almost infinite, and it

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:21.920
<v Speaker 1>has almost infinite amount of energy. How did all this

0:28:22.000 --> 0:28:24.200
<v Speaker 1>stuff that we're living in come from, like a tiny

0:28:24.240 --> 0:28:27.040
<v Speaker 1>black hole for example? Yeah, exactly. That would mean that

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:29.080
<v Speaker 1>there is a bound on the universe, But we don't

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:31.639
<v Speaker 1>know if our universe is bounded. With some of our

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:34.720
<v Speaker 1>theories of cosmology suggests that it should be infinite. It

0:28:34.760 --> 0:28:37.200
<v Speaker 1>would be most natural if it were infinite, but we

0:28:37.320 --> 0:28:38.880
<v Speaker 1>just don't know that, and we can only see a

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:42.000
<v Speaker 1>limited part of the universe. The portion of the universe

0:28:42.080 --> 0:28:44.320
<v Speaker 1>we can see now is about ninety three billion light

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:46.880
<v Speaker 1>years wide, and we just don't know what's beyond that.

0:28:47.280 --> 0:28:49.480
<v Speaker 1>And we also know that our universe is expanding, and

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:52.960
<v Speaker 1>the mechanism for that is totally unexplained. So it is

0:28:53.080 --> 0:28:56.840
<v Speaker 1>possible that our entire universe is inside some like mega

0:28:57.040 --> 0:29:00.560
<v Speaker 1>black hole that's just unimaginably wide. Okay, So then the

0:29:00.640 --> 0:29:03.680
<v Speaker 1>idea is that in our universe, or basically any universe,

0:29:03.920 --> 0:29:06.200
<v Speaker 1>whenever there's a black hole, it's sort of creating a

0:29:06.280 --> 0:29:09.680
<v Speaker 1>whole new kind of universe, and those new universes are

0:29:10.240 --> 0:29:13.320
<v Speaker 1>the same or slightly different than the parent universe. They're

0:29:13.440 --> 0:29:16.800
<v Speaker 1>slightly different. So when you create a new universe inside

0:29:16.840 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 1>a black hole somehow, and this is like where the

0:29:19.280 --> 0:29:22.440
<v Speaker 1>magic happens, the laws of physics tweak a little bit,

0:29:22.560 --> 0:29:26.360
<v Speaker 1>like that process of bending space time and that singularity

0:29:26.640 --> 0:29:30.280
<v Speaker 1>somehow changes the fundamental constants of that universe a little bit.

0:29:30.640 --> 0:29:33.080
<v Speaker 1>And this part of the theory is extremely fuzzy because

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:34.960
<v Speaker 1>like we don't have a mechanism to understand how that

0:29:35.040 --> 0:29:37.840
<v Speaker 1>might happen. It's just like a what if. And so

0:29:38.080 --> 0:29:41.000
<v Speaker 1>in that way, you can sort of like explore different

0:29:41.080 --> 0:29:44.320
<v Speaker 1>possible universes. You can in one universe create lots of

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:47.800
<v Speaker 1>babies with different sort of properties, the same way that

0:29:47.920 --> 0:29:51.400
<v Speaker 1>in natural selection, if a spider has a thousand offspring

0:29:51.440 --> 0:29:53.360
<v Speaker 1>and they're all a little bit different than the ones

0:29:53.480 --> 0:29:56.760
<v Speaker 1>that are best suited to survival, will continue. So in

0:29:56.840 --> 0:29:59.920
<v Speaker 1>this model, you create lots of baby universes in law

0:30:00.040 --> 0:30:02.680
<v Speaker 1>two black holes and the ones that are more likely

0:30:02.760 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 1>to create more black holes within them. So now black

0:30:05.800 --> 0:30:10.920
<v Speaker 1>holes within black holes are more likely to create more universes, right,

0:30:11.040 --> 0:30:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and so you can just call those black holes turtles,

0:30:13.280 --> 0:30:15.000
<v Speaker 1>and it is sort of turtles all the way. Now,

0:30:16.320 --> 0:30:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I think a big question here is you know, like

0:30:19.040 --> 0:30:22.560
<v Speaker 1>in natural selection and regular biological evolution, you have DNA,

0:30:22.760 --> 0:30:25.200
<v Speaker 1>and that makes sense that like your DNA changes a

0:30:25.240 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 1>little and then your kids carry on that DNA that's

0:30:27.600 --> 0:30:29.640
<v Speaker 1>changed a little bit. But like you said, there's sort

0:30:29.640 --> 0:30:33.520
<v Speaker 1>of no known way in which like that new universe

0:30:34.320 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 1>we will have different constants, right, Like, like why would

0:30:37.880 --> 0:30:40.080
<v Speaker 1>it have different constants if it's being born in the

0:30:40.280 --> 0:30:43.560
<v Speaker 1>in the universe with certain laws and certain constants. Yeah, absolutely,

0:30:43.680 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 1>that's not something we understand. And you're right, Like for

0:30:46.920 --> 0:30:49.320
<v Speaker 1>natural selection, we understand the mechanism of it, right, you

0:30:49.400 --> 0:30:52.120
<v Speaker 1>have the genetic code which is then modified. And so

0:30:52.280 --> 0:30:55.360
<v Speaker 1>in this case we have no explanation for how that happens,

0:30:55.440 --> 0:30:59.080
<v Speaker 1>no mechanism for it. You know, maybe the fundamental constants

0:30:59.120 --> 0:31:02.320
<v Speaker 1>of the universe are ord in some deep process and

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:06.440
<v Speaker 1>the creation of a singularity disturbs that process. Really just speculating,

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:08.880
<v Speaker 1>and the theory itself has not been fleshed out. We

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:12.200
<v Speaker 1>don't have any sort of like DNA like mechanism that

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:15.480
<v Speaker 1>explains where these parameters are like stored and how they

0:31:15.600 --> 0:31:19.280
<v Speaker 1>might be modified by a singularities. Really just speculation, But

0:31:19.400 --> 0:31:22.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, physics works this way. Sometimes we're like, let's, uh,

0:31:22.120 --> 0:31:23.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, put a bunch of dots down, and we'll

0:31:23.720 --> 0:31:25.920
<v Speaker 1>come back later and connect to those dots. But let's

0:31:25.920 --> 0:31:27.520
<v Speaker 1>see how far we can get with sort of a

0:31:27.560 --> 0:31:29.960
<v Speaker 1>string of big ideas, and you know, we'll circle back

0:31:30.000 --> 0:31:33.280
<v Speaker 1>and filling some of the crucial details later. All right, Well,

0:31:33.480 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 1>so then the basic ideas that you know, our universe

0:31:35.920 --> 0:31:37.920
<v Speaker 1>makes a whole bunch of black holes, and each of

0:31:38.000 --> 0:31:40.280
<v Speaker 1>those black holes has a universe, and some of the

0:31:40.360 --> 0:31:43.360
<v Speaker 1>our baby universes make more black holes, and some of

0:31:43.400 --> 0:31:45.680
<v Speaker 1>them don't make a lot of black holes, and so

0:31:45.760 --> 0:31:48.560
<v Speaker 1>the ones that make more black holes are then going

0:31:48.600 --> 0:31:51.560
<v Speaker 1>to have their own kid universes who are also good

0:31:51.600 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 1>at making black holes, and some of them will make

0:31:53.640 --> 0:31:55.440
<v Speaker 1>more black holes. And eventually, don't you get to a

0:31:55.560 --> 0:31:58.200
<v Speaker 1>universe that's all black holes. And that's the idea that

0:31:58.360 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 1>this process is more like to give you universes that

0:32:01.720 --> 0:32:04.920
<v Speaker 1>are likely to have black holes, and so you should

0:32:05.080 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 1>end up with universes where the numbers are fine tuned

0:32:08.880 --> 0:32:12.480
<v Speaker 1>to sort of maximize black holes. And so that's the

0:32:12.600 --> 0:32:15.120
<v Speaker 1>argument at least Moan makes is he says, I'm looking

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 1>at the parameters, and it seems to me like if

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:19.480
<v Speaker 1>you change some of these parameters, you end up with

0:32:19.680 --> 0:32:22.680
<v Speaker 1>fewer black holes in the universe. And so maybe our

0:32:22.840 --> 0:32:26.640
<v Speaker 1>universe is sort of like at the maximum black holiness. Oh,

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:31.479
<v Speaker 1>I see, that's the idea that somehow, maybe we're at

0:32:31.520 --> 0:32:34.480
<v Speaker 1>the maximum black hole capacity, Like this is the most

0:32:34.560 --> 0:32:37.320
<v Speaker 1>that any universe can make of black holes. That's sort

0:32:37.320 --> 0:32:39.280
<v Speaker 1>of the argument, and we'll talk later about whether that's

0:32:39.280 --> 0:32:41.720
<v Speaker 1>actually true. But you know, it's got to maximize something,

0:32:41.760 --> 0:32:44.760
<v Speaker 1>and it's interesting this idea that it doesn't maximize us, right.

0:32:44.840 --> 0:32:47.680
<v Speaker 1>I like this idea because it's not anthrocentric. It's not

0:32:47.840 --> 0:32:50.719
<v Speaker 1>like the universe was created for us. It's like, oh,

0:32:50.800 --> 0:32:53.280
<v Speaker 1>it turns out we're a byproduct of the universe being

0:32:53.360 --> 0:32:56.920
<v Speaker 1>optimized for something totally different, which is production of black holes.

0:32:57.360 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 1>And that's pretty cool. And you know, it's interesting how

0:32:59.520 --> 0:33:01.920
<v Speaker 1>many black holes there are right there, black holes everywhere.

0:33:01.960 --> 0:33:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Every galaxy is a super massive black hole in it.

0:33:04.520 --> 0:33:06.680
<v Speaker 1>Stars are collapsing in the black holes all the time.

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:09.120
<v Speaker 1>It does seem like the fate of our universe, as

0:33:09.160 --> 0:33:11.720
<v Speaker 1>you say, is to end up as a huge string

0:33:11.880 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 1>of black holes. And so it does kind of feel

0:33:14.840 --> 0:33:17.520
<v Speaker 1>like we are a maximal black holiness and we should

0:33:17.520 --> 0:33:20.840
<v Speaker 1>rename the podcast to maximal black Holiness. That has a

0:33:20.880 --> 0:33:23.440
<v Speaker 1>better ring to it. Maybe. All right, well, let's get

0:33:23.480 --> 0:33:26.280
<v Speaker 1>into what does it all mean, man, and is this

0:33:26.480 --> 0:33:29.640
<v Speaker 1>theory right or is it totally bonkers? But first let's

0:33:29.640 --> 0:33:44.680
<v Speaker 1>take another quick break. All right, we are talking about

0:33:45.000 --> 0:33:49.959
<v Speaker 1>cosmological natural selection, the idea that the universe somehow evolved

0:33:50.040 --> 0:33:51.600
<v Speaker 1>to be the way it is and that's why it

0:33:51.760 --> 0:33:54.120
<v Speaker 1>is the way it is. We talked about how maybe

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 1>the universe is the way it is because we're at

0:33:56.600 --> 0:34:00.280
<v Speaker 1>like optimal black hole making capacity of the universe, and

0:34:00.360 --> 0:34:01.960
<v Speaker 1>so that's why the universe is the way it is

0:34:02.440 --> 0:34:05.000
<v Speaker 1>and not some other way. Yeah. So I so I

0:34:05.160 --> 0:34:07.640
<v Speaker 1>question was, why do we think that we're an optimal

0:34:07.760 --> 0:34:11.680
<v Speaker 1>maximal black holiness or black hole making capacity, Like couldn't

0:34:11.800 --> 0:34:13.640
<v Speaker 1>it feels like there's a lot of rooms still left

0:34:13.680 --> 0:34:15.879
<v Speaker 1>in the universe for to make more black holes? Yeah,

0:34:15.880 --> 0:34:18.360
<v Speaker 1>how would you make our universe black holier? I don't know,

0:34:18.360 --> 0:34:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I just poke a bunch of holes in it, you know,

0:34:21.000 --> 0:34:23.640
<v Speaker 1>Like why not? Like could in the universe be such

0:34:23.680 --> 0:34:26.080
<v Speaker 1>a way that they pop up more randomly or something.

0:34:26.560 --> 0:34:28.279
<v Speaker 1>It's really interesting to think about. And you know, it

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 1>takes some of these parameters like the mass of the

0:34:31.680 --> 0:34:34.480
<v Speaker 1>strange cork for example, you know, relative to the mass

0:34:34.480 --> 0:34:37.080
<v Speaker 1>of the other corks. It's interesting because that actually does

0:34:37.239 --> 0:34:40.320
<v Speaker 1>help determine the number of black holes in our universe

0:34:40.480 --> 0:34:43.279
<v Speaker 1>because it creates an opportunity for matter to form something

0:34:43.360 --> 0:34:45.800
<v Speaker 1>that's not a black hole, that's a neutron star. Like

0:34:46.160 --> 0:34:49.880
<v Speaker 1>if you have not enough stuff in your star, then

0:34:49.960 --> 0:34:52.200
<v Speaker 1>sometimes when it collapses, it doesn't form a black hole.

0:34:52.440 --> 0:34:55.000
<v Speaker 1>Instead it forms a neutron star. And it forms a

0:34:55.040 --> 0:34:58.960
<v Speaker 1>neutron star because gravity isn't powerful enough to overcome the

0:34:59.120 --> 0:35:02.239
<v Speaker 1>nuclear force. Is that are preventing the collapse, and that's

0:35:02.320 --> 0:35:05.640
<v Speaker 1>partially controlled by the mass of the strange cork. You know,

0:35:05.719 --> 0:35:07.840
<v Speaker 1>what happens inside a neutron star is not something that

0:35:07.920 --> 0:35:10.439
<v Speaker 1>we understand very well. It's the strong force at work,

0:35:10.800 --> 0:35:13.560
<v Speaker 1>zillions of bluons back and forth all the time. But

0:35:13.680 --> 0:35:16.040
<v Speaker 1>these things are very sensitively dependent on the masses of

0:35:16.120 --> 0:35:19.239
<v Speaker 1>the corks that are involved. And so, for example, if

0:35:19.280 --> 0:35:21.800
<v Speaker 1>you increase the strange cork mass, if we were in

0:35:21.840 --> 0:35:25.160
<v Speaker 1>a universe where the strange cork mass was larger than

0:35:25.200 --> 0:35:28.360
<v Speaker 1>those forces would be more powerful and lots more stars

0:35:28.400 --> 0:35:31.680
<v Speaker 1>would collapse into neutron stars instead of black holes. So

0:35:31.840 --> 0:35:34.480
<v Speaker 1>you tweak this parameter, you get fewer black holes in

0:35:34.560 --> 0:35:37.399
<v Speaker 1>our universe. But then wouldn't that work the other way

0:35:37.480 --> 0:35:40.719
<v Speaker 1>to like, if you decrease the strange cork mass, and

0:35:40.719 --> 0:35:42.880
<v Speaker 1>you would get more black holes. So why isn't the

0:35:43.360 --> 0:35:46.839
<v Speaker 1>mass of the strange cork smaller if we are an

0:35:46.840 --> 0:35:50.200
<v Speaker 1>optimal black hole making capacity? And that's one of the

0:35:50.280 --> 0:35:53.400
<v Speaker 1>main criticisms. Lee Smolin came up with this argument, and

0:35:53.520 --> 0:35:56.360
<v Speaker 1>he suggested that a lot of these parameters are tuned

0:35:56.440 --> 0:35:58.480
<v Speaker 1>for black holes. But then other people came and looked

0:35:58.480 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 1>at these parameters, like, actually, it's not that hard to

0:36:01.440 --> 0:36:05.279
<v Speaker 1>make universes that are black holier Joe Silka, famous astronomer,

0:36:05.360 --> 0:36:07.600
<v Speaker 1>tweaked the parameters and he came up with a universe

0:36:07.920 --> 0:36:11.120
<v Speaker 1>that could make ten thousand times more black holes than

0:36:11.320 --> 0:36:14.000
<v Speaker 1>our universe. And you know, number one is you decrease

0:36:14.040 --> 0:36:16.120
<v Speaker 1>the strange cork mass, and number two is you crank

0:36:16.200 --> 0:36:18.560
<v Speaker 1>up the strength of gravity. Right, so it tends to

0:36:18.719 --> 0:36:21.000
<v Speaker 1>collapse things faster. You don't want to crank it up

0:36:21.040 --> 0:36:23.760
<v Speaker 1>too much, right, You want a large number of black holes,

0:36:23.840 --> 0:36:26.359
<v Speaker 1>not just like a single black hole. So you've gotta

0:36:26.440 --> 0:36:28.880
<v Speaker 1>left stuff spread out a little bit and then collapse

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:31.959
<v Speaker 1>into a lot of black holes. M oh, I see

0:36:32.040 --> 0:36:34.240
<v Speaker 1>you're saying things are being like this for a number

0:36:34.280 --> 0:36:37.359
<v Speaker 1>of black holes, not like, let's make a giant black hole,

0:36:37.680 --> 0:36:39.320
<v Speaker 1>because if you do, then that means you only have

0:36:39.400 --> 0:36:41.840
<v Speaker 1>one offspring. Kind of That's right. As fun as that sounds,

0:36:42.000 --> 0:36:44.640
<v Speaker 1>let's make a giant black hole, it's maybe not the

0:36:44.719 --> 0:36:47.239
<v Speaker 1>best plan if your goal is to have lots and

0:36:47.480 --> 0:36:51.239
<v Speaker 1>lots of baby universes, not just one mega baby, right,

0:36:51.320 --> 0:36:53.120
<v Speaker 1>But I guess you also don't want to have you know,

0:36:53.320 --> 0:36:55.320
<v Speaker 1>lots and lots of or like an infinite number of

0:36:55.400 --> 0:36:59.080
<v Speaker 1>tiny baby black holes right or small tiny sort of

0:36:59.200 --> 0:37:01.000
<v Speaker 1>easy to evapp for a black holes, you want like

0:37:01.080 --> 0:37:04.400
<v Speaker 1>a good number of significant black holes as your children exactly.

0:37:04.480 --> 0:37:07.240
<v Speaker 1>If your black holes are too small, then they will evaporate,

0:37:07.280 --> 0:37:09.759
<v Speaker 1>as you say, because black holes are not completely black,

0:37:09.880 --> 0:37:12.319
<v Speaker 1>they give off a little bit of energy, and they

0:37:12.440 --> 0:37:15.520
<v Speaker 1>give off more energy the smaller they are, so smaller

0:37:15.560 --> 0:37:19.080
<v Speaker 1>black holes are more likely to evaporate away into nothingness.

0:37:19.440 --> 0:37:21.279
<v Speaker 1>So you need to be big enough that they can

0:37:21.360 --> 0:37:24.200
<v Speaker 1>be sustained that they can keep gobbling things. So you

0:37:24.239 --> 0:37:26.200
<v Speaker 1>don't want one mega black hole, you don't want an

0:37:26.200 --> 0:37:28.640
<v Speaker 1>infinite number of tiny ones. There is a little bit

0:37:28.680 --> 0:37:30.920
<v Speaker 1>of a balancing act to play there. So the basic

0:37:31.000 --> 0:37:33.680
<v Speaker 1>ideas that maybe all those control maps in the universe,

0:37:33.760 --> 0:37:36.120
<v Speaker 1>all those numbers that we can't explain, are the way

0:37:36.160 --> 0:37:41.719
<v Speaker 1>they are because somehow they maximize the universe's conditions for

0:37:42.120 --> 0:37:44.879
<v Speaker 1>making the right, the most and best kind of black

0:37:44.920 --> 0:37:48.600
<v Speaker 1>holes exactly. And that doesn't argue that the universe has

0:37:48.680 --> 0:37:51.560
<v Speaker 1>to be maximized for black holiness, to suggest that there

0:37:51.560 --> 0:37:53.960
<v Speaker 1>are lots of universes out there, but there are more

0:37:54.440 --> 0:37:56.840
<v Speaker 1>that are close to this maximum because they tend to

0:37:56.880 --> 0:37:59.600
<v Speaker 1>produce more. And so if you're gonna randomly choose among

0:37:59.760 --> 0:38:02.160
<v Speaker 1>uni versus to be in that you're more likely to

0:38:02.320 --> 0:38:05.320
<v Speaker 1>end up in the universe that's closer to the maximum.

0:38:05.600 --> 0:38:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Oh I see, yeah, because I was wondering, like in

0:38:07.640 --> 0:38:10.640
<v Speaker 1>this idea of the universe evolving or universe is evolving,

0:38:10.680 --> 0:38:14.279
<v Speaker 1>there's no natural selection process really, right, There's no like

0:38:14.400 --> 0:38:18.320
<v Speaker 1>predator killing off weak universes or you know, something destroying

0:38:18.360 --> 0:38:20.399
<v Speaker 1>the universes that don't make a lot of black hole.

0:38:20.600 --> 0:38:24.120
<v Speaker 1>It's more like you're more represented in the population of

0:38:24.320 --> 0:38:26.960
<v Speaker 1>all the universes that exist if you're good at making

0:38:27.440 --> 0:38:29.920
<v Speaker 1>black holes. Yeah, everybody can make as many babies as

0:38:30.000 --> 0:38:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I can, and then it's just a race to have

0:38:31.760 --> 0:38:35.319
<v Speaker 1>the most babies. Nobody's eating anybody else's babies. But if

0:38:35.320 --> 0:38:38.000
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna randomly pick somebody to be you're gonna end

0:38:38.080 --> 0:38:40.840
<v Speaker 1>up in a family that makes more babies. Right, So

0:38:41.000 --> 0:38:45.160
<v Speaker 1>there's like an infinite savannah out there in some universe Africa.

0:38:45.360 --> 0:38:48.359
<v Speaker 1>There are no predators. You know, you can multiply as

0:38:48.400 --> 0:38:50.600
<v Speaker 1>you see fit. But the animals or universes that are

0:38:50.600 --> 0:38:53.440
<v Speaker 1>good at multiplying, they're just gonna be more overrepresent they're

0:38:53.480 --> 0:38:56.720
<v Speaker 1>going to basically take over the savannah, right, this infinite savannah.

0:38:56.760 --> 0:38:59.440
<v Speaker 1>And so then that means that we are if we

0:38:59.480 --> 0:39:01.439
<v Speaker 1>are going to this in the universe, we're more likely

0:39:01.480 --> 0:39:04.360
<v Speaker 1>to exist in the universe that's good at making baby

0:39:04.400 --> 0:39:06.600
<v Speaker 1>black holes. That's the argument. And you know, there's a

0:39:06.680 --> 0:39:08.759
<v Speaker 1>lot of steps there and a lot of questions, but

0:39:08.840 --> 0:39:11.879
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of the structure of it interesting. So then

0:39:12.040 --> 0:39:14.040
<v Speaker 1>it's still sort of tentative. And so what are some

0:39:14.280 --> 0:39:16.160
<v Speaker 1>criticisms I guess, or what does it all means do

0:39:16.239 --> 0:39:18.839
<v Speaker 1>to have any interesting implications if it were true? Yeah,

0:39:18.920 --> 0:39:21.480
<v Speaker 1>there aren't criticisms of it. People argue that we're not

0:39:21.560 --> 0:39:25.879
<v Speaker 1>actually that close to maximum black hole production, as I say,

0:39:25.920 --> 0:39:28.880
<v Speaker 1>people to tweak the parameters and done some simulations and

0:39:28.960 --> 0:39:32.320
<v Speaker 1>suggested that you could get many, many more black holes

0:39:32.440 --> 0:39:34.239
<v Speaker 1>than you have in our universe. And you know, the

0:39:34.280 --> 0:39:36.600
<v Speaker 1>thing about this argument is that it's impossible to disprove

0:39:36.719 --> 0:39:38.200
<v Speaker 1>that way. You could say, oh, well, this is the

0:39:38.239 --> 0:39:40.520
<v Speaker 1>way the universe works. We're just a little bit unlucky.

0:39:40.600 --> 0:39:44.080
<v Speaker 1>We're close to the maximum, we're not necessarily at the maximum.

0:39:44.200 --> 0:39:46.839
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna get the best parents have pretty pretty good

0:39:46.880 --> 0:39:49.880
<v Speaker 1>parents we're not in the biggest family, but you know,

0:39:49.920 --> 0:39:52.320
<v Speaker 1>we're not doing too bad. But it does definitely weaken

0:39:52.360 --> 0:39:54.600
<v Speaker 1>the argument. It would be a more compelling argument if

0:39:54.640 --> 0:39:57.080
<v Speaker 1>we were like right at the maximum and you have

0:39:57.160 --> 0:39:59.520
<v Speaker 1>this good argument to suggest that certain values of all

0:39:59.560 --> 0:40:02.600
<v Speaker 1>these univer as parameters overwhelmed everything else, than so the

0:40:02.760 --> 0:40:05.760
<v Speaker 1>universe should be totally dominated by numbers very very close

0:40:06.040 --> 0:40:09.400
<v Speaker 1>to the optimal values. So that's not exactly the case. Well,

0:40:09.480 --> 0:40:12.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess that counter argument to that counter argument is that, like,

0:40:12.920 --> 0:40:15.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe we don't really know if we are optimized for

0:40:15.120 --> 0:40:17.440
<v Speaker 1>optimal black hole of production. Maybe we are, which just

0:40:17.560 --> 0:40:20.560
<v Speaker 1>don't understand the universe well enough to say, like, no,

0:40:20.840 --> 0:40:23.399
<v Speaker 1>this is this is the best number of black holes.

0:40:23.400 --> 0:40:25.279
<v Speaker 1>If we had ten thousand more black holes, you know,

0:40:25.480 --> 0:40:28.560
<v Speaker 1>the universe wouldn't be sustainable, or those black holes wouldn't

0:40:28.560 --> 0:40:30.440
<v Speaker 1>be good enough to make other universes, do you know

0:40:30.480 --> 0:40:32.279
<v Speaker 1>what I mean? That's certainly a good point. We don't

0:40:32.280 --> 0:40:34.040
<v Speaker 1>know how to stimulate the whole history of the universe

0:40:34.120 --> 0:40:36.400
<v Speaker 1>and accurately predict the number of black holes, so these

0:40:36.440 --> 0:40:39.560
<v Speaker 1>simulations are approximations, and there's lots we don't understand about

0:40:39.600 --> 0:40:41.960
<v Speaker 1>the evolution of the universe, big deals about you know,

0:40:42.239 --> 0:40:45.040
<v Speaker 1>what is dark matter and how the universe is expanding

0:40:45.080 --> 0:40:48.200
<v Speaker 1>and why and when. So there's definitely a lot of uncertainty,

0:40:48.239 --> 0:40:51.040
<v Speaker 1>they're sure. And this also has consequences about the like

0:40:51.160 --> 0:40:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the faith of the universe, right, like maybe that means

0:40:53.560 --> 0:40:57.239
<v Speaker 1>that the universes don't implode eventually. Yeah, and this idea

0:40:57.320 --> 0:40:59.520
<v Speaker 1>is not Actually that new sort of been developing over

0:40:59.560 --> 0:41:01.800
<v Speaker 1>a few gades, and it was sort of more in

0:41:02.040 --> 0:41:05.160
<v Speaker 1>vogue when people thought that the universe was going to

0:41:05.320 --> 0:41:07.920
<v Speaker 1>end in a big crunch, when we thought that maybe

0:41:08.160 --> 0:41:10.759
<v Speaker 1>gravity was so powerful that it was going to bring

0:41:10.880 --> 0:41:14.520
<v Speaker 1>the whole universe back together into another singularity that like

0:41:14.719 --> 0:41:17.920
<v Speaker 1>inside black holes, you have this like cycling bounce theory

0:41:18.360 --> 0:41:20.960
<v Speaker 1>a singularity and then expanding space time like a big

0:41:21.040 --> 0:41:23.600
<v Speaker 1>bang and then come back to a singularity. Because people

0:41:23.719 --> 0:41:26.360
<v Speaker 1>like this idea that every universe starts with a singularity

0:41:26.400 --> 0:41:28.880
<v Speaker 1>and ends with a singularity that connects it to like

0:41:29.000 --> 0:41:31.200
<v Speaker 1>what's happening inside a black hole. But now we know

0:41:31.360 --> 0:41:33.560
<v Speaker 1>that the universe is less likely to do that because

0:41:33.600 --> 0:41:36.200
<v Speaker 1>we discovered twenty years ago that the universe is expanding

0:41:36.360 --> 0:41:38.840
<v Speaker 1>and that expansion is accelerating, so it seems like a

0:41:38.920 --> 0:41:41.560
<v Speaker 1>big crunch is less likely to be in our future,

0:41:41.760 --> 0:41:43.680
<v Speaker 1>so that takes a little bit of the shine off

0:41:43.719 --> 0:41:46.320
<v Speaker 1>of this theory. You know, more likely in the future

0:41:46.320 --> 0:41:49.680
<v Speaker 1>of our universe is not one big crunch, but as

0:41:49.760 --> 0:41:53.120
<v Speaker 1>we said earlier, lots and lots of very widely distributed

0:41:53.200 --> 0:41:56.960
<v Speaker 1>black holes, as each sort of local clump of gravitationally

0:41:57.040 --> 0:42:00.440
<v Speaker 1>dominated matter falls into a mega black hole which is

0:42:00.480 --> 0:42:03.520
<v Speaker 1>super separated from all the other clumps of matter which

0:42:03.600 --> 0:42:05.799
<v Speaker 1>is falling into their own black holes. So you end

0:42:05.880 --> 0:42:07.800
<v Speaker 1>up with like a universe with lots and lots of

0:42:07.840 --> 0:42:10.359
<v Speaker 1>black holes in it and nothing else. I see. You're saying,

0:42:10.400 --> 0:42:12.880
<v Speaker 1>like this new theory, but natural selection assumes kind of

0:42:13.040 --> 0:42:15.800
<v Speaker 1>a bouncy universe. But we are not seeing that the

0:42:15.880 --> 0:42:18.759
<v Speaker 1>universe is bouncing. We've seen that it's expanding forever. It's

0:42:18.800 --> 0:42:21.000
<v Speaker 1>expanding forever. Yeah, and we are going to end up

0:42:21.040 --> 0:42:23.239
<v Speaker 1>with more singularities in our future because of all these

0:42:23.280 --> 0:42:26.560
<v Speaker 1>black holes, but not like one meta singularity that pulls

0:42:26.600 --> 0:42:29.200
<v Speaker 1>it all together again. But that's not actually critical. That's

0:42:29.239 --> 0:42:31.160
<v Speaker 1>not a fatal flaw because you don't have to assume

0:42:31.440 --> 0:42:33.520
<v Speaker 1>that inside every black hole is a universe that's going

0:42:33.600 --> 0:42:35.440
<v Speaker 1>to bounce. You can just assume that you create a

0:42:35.480 --> 0:42:38.320
<v Speaker 1>new universe, and whatever happens inside the universe happens inside

0:42:38.360 --> 0:42:40.920
<v Speaker 1>that universe, even if it means creations of lots of

0:42:41.000 --> 0:42:44.080
<v Speaker 1>different black holes inside that black hole universe. So that's

0:42:44.080 --> 0:42:46.200
<v Speaker 1>not a fatal flaw, right right. What happens in a

0:42:46.239 --> 0:42:49.360
<v Speaker 1>black hole stays in the black hole. That's definitely true.

0:42:50.960 --> 0:42:54.000
<v Speaker 1>More concerning is that, you know, we don't understand what

0:42:54.160 --> 0:42:57.799
<v Speaker 1>the implications are for like black hole mergers. We see

0:42:57.880 --> 0:43:00.600
<v Speaker 1>black holes gobbling up each other, like fouring a mega

0:43:00.680 --> 0:43:03.960
<v Speaker 1>black hole as they combine, and that probably happened even

0:43:04.040 --> 0:43:06.960
<v Speaker 1>for things like the black hole the center of our galaxy,

0:43:07.120 --> 0:43:09.680
<v Speaker 1>because our galaxy is likely the product of the collision

0:43:09.719 --> 0:43:12.560
<v Speaker 1>of several galaxies, each of which had their own black hole.

0:43:12.800 --> 0:43:15.840
<v Speaker 1>So Sagittarius A at the center of our galaxy probably

0:43:16.000 --> 0:43:18.399
<v Speaker 1>is the result of several black holes. But if each

0:43:18.440 --> 0:43:21.120
<v Speaker 1>one had a universe inside of it, what happens when

0:43:21.160 --> 0:43:24.840
<v Speaker 1>they emerged the universes collide, you get some other crazy

0:43:24.960 --> 0:43:28.120
<v Speaker 1>thing happening. They would have different laws of physics inside

0:43:28.200 --> 0:43:30.440
<v Speaker 1>each black hole. So like, do you have some sort

0:43:30.480 --> 0:43:33.440
<v Speaker 1>of like how Senate Reconciliation Committee where you negotiate with

0:43:33.520 --> 0:43:36.320
<v Speaker 1>the new laws of physics are and we know that

0:43:36.400 --> 0:43:39.600
<v Speaker 1>always goes smoothly and perfectly. That's right. You know, black

0:43:39.680 --> 0:43:41.960
<v Speaker 1>holes default on their dead limit, et cetera. And so

0:43:42.160 --> 0:43:44.920
<v Speaker 1>that's not something that's understood. And again this is because

0:43:45.040 --> 0:43:47.800
<v Speaker 1>this came about before we understood how often that happened.

0:43:48.120 --> 0:43:50.480
<v Speaker 1>When LEGO turned on and we saw black hole collisions,

0:43:50.520 --> 0:43:52.960
<v Speaker 1>we discovered, Wow, black holes are colliding and merging all

0:43:53.040 --> 0:43:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the time. It's not rare. So it's sort of a

0:43:55.400 --> 0:43:57.600
<v Speaker 1>new thing to face for this theory. Right, Well, we

0:43:57.640 --> 0:43:59.960
<v Speaker 1>don't know what happens, but that's not necessarily an argument

0:44:00.280 --> 0:44:03.759
<v Speaker 1>against this idea, right, Like, maybe you can merge universes

0:44:03.880 --> 0:44:06.359
<v Speaker 1>that that are different, or maybe they annihilate each other

0:44:06.400 --> 0:44:08.279
<v Speaker 1>and they form a new universe, like you, you don't

0:44:08.320 --> 0:44:09.960
<v Speaker 1>know it yet, right, We just don't know. It's an

0:44:10.000 --> 0:44:13.160
<v Speaker 1>open question because we don't understand the mechanism for like

0:44:13.360 --> 0:44:16.640
<v Speaker 1>storing and changing these parameters. We don't understand what would

0:44:16.640 --> 0:44:19.759
<v Speaker 1>happen if two universes with different values of these parameters

0:44:19.880 --> 0:44:22.960
<v Speaker 1>came into contact somehow. And well, there's also the other

0:44:23.040 --> 0:44:25.160
<v Speaker 1>question of like you're sort of assuming that all of

0:44:25.239 --> 0:44:28.080
<v Speaker 1>these universes that are making more universes. Do you all

0:44:28.160 --> 0:44:32.040
<v Speaker 1>work with the same laws. We just can't explain the

0:44:32.080 --> 0:44:34.800
<v Speaker 1>parameters of those laws. But it assumes one set of

0:44:34.880 --> 0:44:38.440
<v Speaker 1>laws for all universes in this giant savannah exactly, and

0:44:38.680 --> 0:44:41.480
<v Speaker 1>we don't understand that structure at all. It's like saying, well,

0:44:41.480 --> 0:44:44.000
<v Speaker 1>all right, I'm explaining why the control panel is set

0:44:44.120 --> 0:44:46.759
<v Speaker 1>this way, but like, who built the control panel? Why

0:44:46.800 --> 0:44:49.560
<v Speaker 1>do you have this many parameters? Why are there twenty

0:44:49.640 --> 0:44:53.000
<v Speaker 1>six parameters and not one? Why have any parameters at all?

0:44:53.360 --> 0:44:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Can't you imagine other universes without parameters? So it doesn't

0:44:56.360 --> 0:44:58.720
<v Speaker 1>answer that deeper question. And that's what I find frustrating

0:44:58.719 --> 0:45:00.640
<v Speaker 1>about a lot of these explanations is that they don't

0:45:00.680 --> 0:45:02.680
<v Speaker 1>go all the way I want to go all the

0:45:02.719 --> 0:45:06.440
<v Speaker 1>way to explaining the universe down to know numbers. You

0:45:06.480 --> 0:45:09.480
<v Speaker 1>mean us a giant savannah full of infinite universes having

0:45:09.560 --> 0:45:12.520
<v Speaker 1>baby black holes. That's not hardcore enough for you, Like,

0:45:12.600 --> 0:45:15.160
<v Speaker 1>do you want to go more extreme than that? I mean,

0:45:15.280 --> 0:45:19.200
<v Speaker 1>it's extremely imaginative and it's evocative mentally, but it doesn't

0:45:19.280 --> 0:45:22.160
<v Speaker 1>really answer questions, you know, because it doesn't let you

0:45:22.400 --> 0:45:25.520
<v Speaker 1>grasp of those things and and ask deeper questions, you know,

0:45:25.560 --> 0:45:27.920
<v Speaker 1>about like this, like why are there all these parameters?

0:45:28.239 --> 0:45:30.440
<v Speaker 1>You know it's a limitation of the theory, but couldn't

0:45:30.480 --> 0:45:33.240
<v Speaker 1>you also apply the same idea though, to this idea

0:45:33.280 --> 0:45:35.560
<v Speaker 1>of laws, like maybe when you make a new baby

0:45:35.600 --> 0:45:38.160
<v Speaker 1>black hole universe, the laws also changed a little bit,

0:45:38.480 --> 0:45:40.680
<v Speaker 1>not just the parameters, and so then you also have

0:45:40.840 --> 0:45:43.839
<v Speaker 1>natural selection of physical laws. All right, I'm gonna call

0:45:43.920 --> 0:45:46.720
<v Speaker 1>that the smoll en cham theory of the universe done.

0:45:47.000 --> 0:45:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Noble Prize. Here's my address. You win one black hole, sir,

0:45:51.480 --> 0:45:54.359
<v Speaker 1>I get half of a Nobel prize. I'll share with Sleep.

0:45:54.360 --> 0:45:56.640
<v Speaker 1>I've mentally at least more than before. I'll be happy

0:45:56.680 --> 0:45:58.200
<v Speaker 1>to share it with him. All right, that sounds like

0:45:58.239 --> 0:46:01.359
<v Speaker 1>a plan. All right, Well, that's the idea, and there's

0:46:01.520 --> 0:46:04.359
<v Speaker 1>something also about the timing of it that's complicated, right, Yeah,

0:46:04.440 --> 0:46:07.040
<v Speaker 1>It's hard to really think about the timing because you

0:46:07.120 --> 0:46:10.160
<v Speaker 1>need to think about like the framework in which this happens.

0:46:10.800 --> 0:46:15.280
<v Speaker 1>Like we're arguing that these universes would create more universes

0:46:15.440 --> 0:46:18.040
<v Speaker 1>with more black holes in them. But you know, if

0:46:18.080 --> 0:46:20.360
<v Speaker 1>you think about how long it takes our universe to

0:46:20.440 --> 0:46:23.400
<v Speaker 1>make black holes, it's like millions or billions of years.

0:46:23.840 --> 0:46:26.760
<v Speaker 1>We do see black holes having formed in the early universe,

0:46:26.880 --> 0:46:29.080
<v Speaker 1>like after a few hundred million years or maybe a

0:46:29.120 --> 0:46:32.120
<v Speaker 1>billion years, but that's kind of a long time. Imagine

0:46:32.160 --> 0:46:36.280
<v Speaker 1>you had other universes that very rapidly formed a smaller

0:46:36.360 --> 0:46:39.160
<v Speaker 1>number of black holes. They would then create their babies

0:46:39.200 --> 0:46:41.440
<v Speaker 1>when they were very very young, and so even if

0:46:41.480 --> 0:46:45.399
<v Speaker 1>they're not creating as many black holes per universe, they're

0:46:45.440 --> 0:46:48.400
<v Speaker 1>reproducing so quickly that they in the end there are

0:46:48.480 --> 0:46:51.560
<v Speaker 1>more of those universes than ones with more black holes

0:46:51.640 --> 0:46:56.120
<v Speaker 1>in them, just because they had babies sooner than everybody else. Yes,

0:46:56.400 --> 0:46:58.720
<v Speaker 1>but you know that depends on this idea of like clocks,

0:46:58.800 --> 0:47:01.279
<v Speaker 1>Like are the clocks and universe really sink to the

0:47:01.360 --> 0:47:04.360
<v Speaker 1>clocks in that universe? When did this whole process start?

0:47:04.760 --> 0:47:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Is there really sort of like a timing for the

0:47:07.360 --> 0:47:10.919
<v Speaker 1>meta universe. It's sort of fuzzy, right, because, as we've

0:47:10.960 --> 0:47:13.319
<v Speaker 1>talked about the at time sort of slows down as

0:47:13.360 --> 0:47:15.319
<v Speaker 1>your approach a black hole, right like when you bend

0:47:15.400 --> 0:47:18.200
<v Speaker 1>gravity that much, time works totally different. Are you Are

0:47:18.239 --> 0:47:21.000
<v Speaker 1>we saying that time works the same inside of the

0:47:21.040 --> 0:47:23.040
<v Speaker 1>black hole. We don't know what's going on inside a

0:47:23.080 --> 0:47:25.560
<v Speaker 1>black hole, right, And this theory would suggest that time

0:47:25.640 --> 0:47:28.960
<v Speaker 1>inside the universe, that space time is expanding inside that

0:47:29.080 --> 0:47:32.319
<v Speaker 1>universe instead of just being like twisted by the singularity.

0:47:32.680 --> 0:47:34.600
<v Speaker 1>But this is a question about like whether you have

0:47:34.760 --> 0:47:37.719
<v Speaker 1>some meta clock that's you know, is counting like how

0:47:37.800 --> 0:47:41.080
<v Speaker 1>long you've taken to create babies, and that like the

0:47:41.160 --> 0:47:43.800
<v Speaker 1>clocks inside the universe are sort of somehow connected to

0:47:43.920 --> 0:47:46.719
<v Speaker 1>this concept of how many universes there are and how

0:47:46.760 --> 0:47:49.080
<v Speaker 1>long it's taken to make those universes. I think what

0:47:49.160 --> 0:47:51.600
<v Speaker 1>you're saying is that evolution is complicated, right, It's not

0:47:51.719 --> 0:47:55.240
<v Speaker 1>just about optimal solutions, like in and in the animal world,

0:47:55.719 --> 0:47:58.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, we're not necessarily the most the most perfect

0:47:58.920 --> 0:48:01.800
<v Speaker 1>animal out We're just happened to be the best animal

0:48:01.960 --> 0:48:04.320
<v Speaker 1>that seems to have survived the most, right, Like, like

0:48:04.360 --> 0:48:06.400
<v Speaker 1>there's still a question of why we have toes, Like

0:48:06.480 --> 0:48:09.200
<v Speaker 1>nobody knows why we have toes, but we're there. They're

0:48:09.200 --> 0:48:12.239
<v Speaker 1>there because you know, something needs to collect lint, I

0:48:12.320 --> 0:48:14.759
<v Speaker 1>guess or you know, the idea is that we're not

0:48:14.880 --> 0:48:17.560
<v Speaker 1>necessarily optimized. We just got here first. Yeah, we're the

0:48:17.600 --> 0:48:20.399
<v Speaker 1>product of our specific history and you know, and wild

0:48:20.400 --> 0:48:24.239
<v Speaker 1>biologists look to explain toes physicist look to explain theories

0:48:24.320 --> 0:48:27.239
<v Speaker 1>of everything, which are also toes. Yeah, there you go.

0:48:28.040 --> 0:48:30.040
<v Speaker 1>So are we Is this the pinky toe of the

0:48:30.160 --> 0:48:33.440
<v Speaker 1>universe or is this the big toe? Oh, it's definitely

0:48:33.480 --> 0:48:36.000
<v Speaker 1>it's the big toe. It's one megato. It's the meta too,

0:48:36.400 --> 0:48:40.239
<v Speaker 1>it's the alpha toe. All right. Well, I think the

0:48:40.320 --> 0:48:42.600
<v Speaker 1>main takeaway here is that we we don't know why

0:48:42.640 --> 0:48:44.759
<v Speaker 1>the universe is the way it is, Like, we have

0:48:45.000 --> 0:48:47.960
<v Speaker 1>really no idea, and so we're open to any crazy idea,

0:48:48.080 --> 0:48:51.919
<v Speaker 1>even like giant savannahs full of competing universes. We really

0:48:51.960 --> 0:48:54.359
<v Speaker 1>are at the beginning of our exploration of all these

0:48:54.440 --> 0:48:56.759
<v Speaker 1>crazy ideas, at the point where we really should take

0:48:56.800 --> 0:49:00.120
<v Speaker 1>seriously concept that seem bonkers, that seem at first is

0:49:00.280 --> 0:49:03.440
<v Speaker 1>like what that's insane? It might actually make sense and

0:49:03.480 --> 0:49:06.799
<v Speaker 1>it might actually describe our reality. Yeah, And I think

0:49:06.840 --> 0:49:09.000
<v Speaker 1>it points to also how much there is still to

0:49:09.120 --> 0:49:11.920
<v Speaker 1>discover about the universe. Right like any kids listening or

0:49:11.920 --> 0:49:14.720
<v Speaker 1>any young aspiring physicists listening to this, or any old

0:49:15.239 --> 0:49:17.719
<v Speaker 1>help physicist to like who aspire to make a big

0:49:17.760 --> 0:49:20.120
<v Speaker 1>break there that you could sort of focus on these

0:49:20.160 --> 0:49:22.720
<v Speaker 1>big questions and there's still a lot to explain about

0:49:22.760 --> 0:49:24.600
<v Speaker 1>why things are the way they are. That's right, and

0:49:24.680 --> 0:49:26.440
<v Speaker 1>I hope it's the young physicists to figure it out

0:49:26.480 --> 0:49:30.080
<v Speaker 1>because I gotta go take a nap. But why do

0:49:30.120 --> 0:49:31.840
<v Speaker 1>you have to take a nap, Daniel? Why do you

0:49:31.920 --> 0:49:34.279
<v Speaker 1>have to take a nap now and not not a later?

0:49:34.840 --> 0:49:36.760
<v Speaker 1>Or why in your couch and not in your futon.

0:49:36.920 --> 0:49:39.000
<v Speaker 1>There's a fundamental parameter of the universe, the number of

0:49:39.080 --> 0:49:42.080
<v Speaker 1>naps per physicists. I see. It's the big end. Nobody

0:49:42.200 --> 0:49:44.640
<v Speaker 1>understands it. And is it dimensionless or or do you

0:49:44.719 --> 0:49:47.319
<v Speaker 1>sleep forever? Or is there a set amount of time

0:49:47.360 --> 0:49:49.480
<v Speaker 1>that you are units of time that do you sleep for?

0:49:49.800 --> 0:49:52.399
<v Speaker 1>I sleep in many dimensions? All right, Well, we hope

0:49:52.400 --> 0:49:54.400
<v Speaker 1>you enjoyed that and made you think about why we

0:49:54.480 --> 0:49:57.160
<v Speaker 1>are here and why we are in this universe, which

0:49:57.200 --> 0:50:00.080
<v Speaker 1>seems pretty good. But who knows. Maybe it's not subot well,

0:50:00.160 --> 0:50:02.719
<v Speaker 1>maybe we are in the pink toe of all the universites.

0:50:02.920 --> 0:50:05.880
<v Speaker 1>Whatever universe it is, I like it. Thanks for joining us,

0:50:06.160 --> 0:50:16.120
<v Speaker 1>see you next time. Thanks for listening, and remember that

0:50:16.280 --> 0:50:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Daniel and Jorge explained the universe is a production of

0:50:19.160 --> 0:50:22.479
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio or more podcast from my Heart Radio.

0:50:22.640 --> 0:50:26.200
<v Speaker 1>Visit the I heart Radio app, Apple podcasts, or wherever

0:50:26.320 --> 0:50:29.960
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows. H