WEBVTT - TechStuff Classic: Photo Editing and Manipulation, Part One

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:11.960 --> 0:00:14.440
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:14.480 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>John Than Strickland. I'm an executive producer with iHeart Radio

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 1>and how the tech area. It's time for a classic

0:00:20.920 --> 0:00:24.360
<v Speaker 1>episode of tech Stuff. This episode is titled Photo Editing

0:00:24.400 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 1>and Manipulation Art one, So I guess you can probably

0:00:30.000 --> 0:00:33.200
<v Speaker 1>make an educated guess about what next week's classic episode

0:00:33.200 --> 0:00:35.960
<v Speaker 1>is going to be. This episode originally published on August

0:00:36.000 --> 0:00:40.479
<v Speaker 1>thirty one, two thousand fifteen. Dylan, who at the time

0:00:40.560 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>was sort of working in our our social media and

0:00:44.040 --> 0:00:48.040
<v Speaker 1>marketing areas, was a guest host on this one. Now

0:00:48.600 --> 0:00:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Dylan is a managing executive producer with I Heart, So

0:00:52.760 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the dude is a superstar at I Heart really is

0:00:56.960 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 1>an incredible person, does incredible work. By way back then,

0:01:01.720 --> 0:01:04.720
<v Speaker 1>Dylan was fairly new and uh so I decided to

0:01:04.720 --> 0:01:06.560
<v Speaker 1>show in the ropes and have them on to talk

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 1>about manipulating photos online for fun and profit. Enjoy. Dylan

0:01:13.319 --> 0:01:17.240
<v Speaker 1>has generously offered up some of his precious time to

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 1>jump into the studio to talk about photo manipulation and

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:23.399
<v Speaker 1>photo editing. So this is going to be a two

0:01:23.480 --> 0:01:27.400
<v Speaker 1>part podcast. We know that starting off, we're gonna concentrate

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:30.839
<v Speaker 1>on sort of the pre digital era for this first episode,

0:01:31.160 --> 0:01:33.280
<v Speaker 1>and then our next one will be kind of the

0:01:33.400 --> 0:01:38.679
<v Speaker 1>various techniques and motivations behind photo manipulation and the post

0:01:38.840 --> 0:01:43.760
<v Speaker 1>digital era where we're no longer talking necessarily about physical

0:01:43.840 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 1>media but lots of zeros and ones instead. But the

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the interesting thing to me is that photo manipulation has

0:01:51.640 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 1>been around almost as long as photography has, and in

0:01:57.840 --> 0:02:01.480
<v Speaker 1>large part because of the limitation of photography, especially the

0:02:01.520 --> 0:02:06.240
<v Speaker 1>early days, it was kind of seen early on as Okay, well,

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:09.240
<v Speaker 1>we have the foundation down, now how do we make

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:11.640
<v Speaker 1>up for all the things that we can't do at

0:02:11.680 --> 0:02:13.880
<v Speaker 1>least yet. You know, you don't know in their mind

0:02:13.919 --> 0:02:16.359
<v Speaker 1>if they knew that was going to be a possibility

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:20.880
<v Speaker 1>in the future, but um, it kind of gave them

0:02:20.960 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 1>the ability to add to a photo what cameras were

0:02:25.639 --> 0:02:29.520
<v Speaker 1>not able to do at the moment. Yeah. Yeah, those

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 1>early cameras were incredibly limited. And uh, you know, it

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:36.560
<v Speaker 1>helps if we take kind of a step back and

0:02:36.600 --> 0:02:38.560
<v Speaker 1>look at a little bit of history. And by a

0:02:38.560 --> 0:02:41.079
<v Speaker 1>little bit of history, I mean I've created a timeline

0:02:41.120 --> 0:02:45.440
<v Speaker 1>to kind of walk us through the early development no

0:02:45.480 --> 0:02:48.440
<v Speaker 1>pun intended. Okay, no, that was definitely a pun intended

0:02:48.800 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>of photography. So before we get to any photography at all,

0:02:52.600 --> 0:02:55.360
<v Speaker 1>before we get to the point where we're recording light

0:02:56.040 --> 0:02:59.800
<v Speaker 1>onto some medium, we can talk a little bit about

0:03:00.440 --> 0:03:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the camera obscura, which was not necessarily about recording recording images,

0:03:04.919 --> 0:03:09.399
<v Speaker 1>but more about projecting them. Yes, and this is ancient technology.

0:03:09.440 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, when you think about it, the basic technology

0:03:12.520 --> 0:03:15.640
<v Speaker 1>was a dark chamber or room through which you have

0:03:15.680 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 1>a hole in one wall and then you can project

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 1>across the on the opposite wall. Yeah, and uh, what

0:03:23.080 --> 0:03:27.840
<v Speaker 1>you saw on the opposite wall would be correct in perspective,

0:03:28.080 --> 0:03:31.799
<v Speaker 1>but it would be eight degrees rotating hundred degrees. It

0:03:31.840 --> 0:03:35.280
<v Speaker 1>would be upside down. Yeah. So I I have often

0:03:35.360 --> 0:03:38.240
<v Speaker 1>seen this used as a way for artists who wanted

0:03:38.280 --> 0:03:41.960
<v Speaker 1>to do a big wall mural. For example, they would

0:03:41.960 --> 0:03:44.320
<v Speaker 1>have an image on one side, so it would be

0:03:44.320 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 1>projected large on the opposite where they could actually trace

0:03:47.720 --> 0:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>things out, although not all artists were very capable of

0:03:51.480 --> 0:03:54.440
<v Speaker 1>doing this, and it wouldn't be until the Renaissance. Like

0:03:54.480 --> 0:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>even though the technology itself was thousands of years old,

0:03:56.840 --> 0:04:00.280
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that the ancient Chinese and Greek we're

0:04:00.400 --> 0:04:04.400
<v Speaker 1>using the sort of yeah, it really does. It's always

0:04:04.440 --> 0:04:06.080
<v Speaker 1>like it's always like, well, you have you got to

0:04:06.120 --> 0:04:07.600
<v Speaker 1>look to the Middle East and you gotta look to

0:04:07.680 --> 0:04:09.960
<v Speaker 1>China for some of these amazing developments that took a

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 1>long time to make their way to the Western world.

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:15.800
<v Speaker 1>But in the Renaissance, there was an Italian writer named

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:20.120
<v Speaker 1>Gia Batista de la Porta who was really the first

0:04:20.200 --> 0:04:23.839
<v Speaker 1>to use a lens arrangement in camera scarre. So it

0:04:23.880 --> 0:04:26.560
<v Speaker 1>was more than just the simple hole or a mirror.

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:30.320
<v Speaker 1>It was a lens. And uh, that's where we started

0:04:30.320 --> 0:04:35.200
<v Speaker 1>really calling it camera obscura. And then you move ahead

0:04:35.560 --> 0:04:39.560
<v Speaker 1>about a hundred two hundred years to seventy seven, and

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:42.359
<v Speaker 1>that's when a gentleman by the name of Johann Heinrich

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Schulz uh noticed something really odd. In fact, it was

0:04:47.520 --> 0:04:49.080
<v Speaker 1>something that other people had noticed, but he was the

0:04:49.080 --> 0:04:52.120
<v Speaker 1>one who actually put two and two together. We're talking

0:04:52.200 --> 0:04:58.680
<v Speaker 1>silver salts here. Now, silver salts, when exposed to light, uh,

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:04.039
<v Speaker 1>get darker. And this is a major part of early photography.

0:05:04.080 --> 0:05:07.359
<v Speaker 1>But for a long time people thought that it was

0:05:07.680 --> 0:05:11.640
<v Speaker 1>heat that made the salts turn dark. Now, what Schultz

0:05:11.680 --> 0:05:15.600
<v Speaker 1>did was he had an experiment where he he had

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:19.640
<v Speaker 1>essentially a surface covered in silver salts, and he put

0:05:20.440 --> 0:05:22.680
<v Speaker 1>a covering over it so that he could spell out

0:05:22.680 --> 0:05:25.040
<v Speaker 1>a word in the silver salt and then expose that

0:05:25.120 --> 0:05:27.960
<v Speaker 1>to light, and it made those salts turn dark. So

0:05:28.000 --> 0:05:32.839
<v Speaker 1>he actually could spell out words using light this way,

0:05:32.880 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 1>but he didn't have any way of preserving it. There's

0:05:35.560 --> 0:05:37.640
<v Speaker 1>no way for him to keep this so that it

0:05:37.680 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 1>would permanently have this word. In fact, as soon as

0:05:40.120 --> 0:05:43.920
<v Speaker 1>you remove the covering and the rest of the salts

0:05:43.920 --> 0:05:46.800
<v Speaker 1>are exposed to light, everything turns dark. So it's like

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:48.840
<v Speaker 1>you have a temporary image. It's kind of like the

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Snapchat of its day. Yeah, that a very very kind

0:05:55.640 --> 0:05:58.159
<v Speaker 1>of simple snapchat where someone would have to be in

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:01.279
<v Speaker 1>there with you and be like, all right, you're gonna

0:06:01.320 --> 0:06:03.280
<v Speaker 1>have to look at this right now, because as soon

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:06.480
<v Speaker 1>as I turn on the light, this sucker, it's it's

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:11.839
<v Speaker 1>it's time. Will be very limited a latent image. Um yeah,

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 1>in a way that like if you see something very

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:17.479
<v Speaker 1>bright and you close your eyes, right there it is. Yeah,

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:20.360
<v Speaker 1>So it wouldn't be until the eighteen twenties. That's when

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:24.839
<v Speaker 1>a fellow by the name of Anissa four Neepsie thank

0:06:24.880 --> 0:06:28.600
<v Speaker 1>you for pronouncing that that's a guess, my French jump.

0:06:28.680 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Papa francis bien malorism So I am not very good

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:37.719
<v Speaker 1>with the French pronunciation. I haven't had French since high school,

0:06:37.800 --> 0:06:41.000
<v Speaker 1>so I apologize for butchering the name. But he developed

0:06:41.000 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 1>a technique to use light in order to make copies

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:47.720
<v Speaker 1>of engravings. And what he would do is he would

0:06:47.720 --> 0:06:50.280
<v Speaker 1>take it engraving and covered in oil and then he

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:53.040
<v Speaker 1>would put the engraving on a plate that was coated

0:06:53.360 --> 0:06:57.359
<v Speaker 1>with a combination of lavender oil and vitamin of Judea,

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:01.200
<v Speaker 1>which is a light sensitive material. And yeah, and he

0:07:01.920 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 1>had the first successful image in eighteen sixteen. Yeah, amazing, right,

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:09.039
<v Speaker 1>Like he was able to use this and he called

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the process heliography, meaning from the sun to right, so

0:07:14.520 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 1>it was close to photography, but he was calling it heliography.

0:07:17.520 --> 0:07:19.520
<v Speaker 1>By eighteen twenty six he was using that process on

0:07:19.640 --> 0:07:23.040
<v Speaker 1>lots of stuff like lithographic stone, on glass, on zinc,

0:07:23.080 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and on pewter plates. And in eight he used a

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:31.200
<v Speaker 1>camera obscura computer plate to produce a photograph from nature.

0:07:31.320 --> 0:07:33.720
<v Speaker 1>It was an image of the courtyard of his estate.

0:07:33.720 --> 0:07:37.640
<v Speaker 1>It was taken from an upstairs balcony and over the

0:07:37.680 --> 0:07:40.520
<v Speaker 1>course of eight hours. Yes, it took a number of hours. Yeah,

0:07:40.560 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 1>that was the real issue where with these early approaches

0:07:43.560 --> 0:07:47.640
<v Speaker 1>is that they had not perfected the chemistry necessary to

0:07:47.720 --> 0:07:51.800
<v Speaker 1>have this reaction of light that would affect chemicals in

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>such a way as to preserve an image. What's really

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>funny is that the lens technology was much farther ahead

0:07:58.240 --> 0:08:01.440
<v Speaker 1>from the start than the chemist street and a lot

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:07.280
<v Speaker 1>of early photography was really only limited by the chemicals involved. Right, Yeah,

0:08:07.360 --> 0:08:09.800
<v Speaker 1>so you would end up having these super long exposure

0:08:09.800 --> 0:08:12.080
<v Speaker 1>times in the in some cases it meant that the

0:08:12.080 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 1>the image you produced is otherworldly because in the case

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:21.120
<v Speaker 1>of this one with a courtyard, the lights coming from

0:08:21.120 --> 0:08:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the sun, and it's over the course of eight hours,

0:08:23.280 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 1>which reads, the sun starts in the east and ends

0:08:25.520 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 1>in the west, So in the finished image you have

0:08:28.440 --> 0:08:32.680
<v Speaker 1>light from the sun shining from both directions. It's as if,

0:08:32.720 --> 0:08:34.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, obviously, we don't live in a world where

0:08:34.880 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>you can really do that in a in an instant.

0:08:36.960 --> 0:08:39.320
<v Speaker 1>You would have to have this long exposure time in

0:08:39.440 --> 0:08:43.120
<v Speaker 1>order to achieve that, so kind of a special effect

0:08:43.320 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 1>just by the very limitation of the media itself. Yeah,

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:50.200
<v Speaker 1>the exposure time is early on would would make things,

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 1>like you said, look very otherworldly. And it was just

0:08:52.880 --> 0:08:56.280
<v Speaker 1>because it was out of necessity, that's what they had. Yeah,

0:08:55.920 --> 0:08:58.960
<v Speaker 1>they didn't have any option really like, it wasn't like

0:08:59.480 --> 0:09:01.440
<v Speaker 1>it had nothing to do with shutter speed or any

0:09:01.480 --> 0:09:03.840
<v Speaker 1>of the other stuff we talked about with cameras. It

0:09:03.880 --> 0:09:08.079
<v Speaker 1>had specifically to do with the limitation of the materials,

0:09:08.120 --> 0:09:11.600
<v Speaker 1>the chemicals they were using. By eighteen thirty three, that's

0:09:11.600 --> 0:09:16.160
<v Speaker 1>when we first start seeing the term photograph being used. Uh.

0:09:16.200 --> 0:09:19.920
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, it was apparently coined by a fellow

0:09:20.000 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 1>named Hercules Florence or Hercule floren if you want to

0:09:25.080 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 1>be fancy. Uh. He coined the term, using it to

0:09:28.800 --> 0:09:31.200
<v Speaker 1>describe a process in which he used paper with silver

0:09:31.320 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 1>salts to produce prints of drawings. However, his work actually

0:09:35.600 --> 0:09:39.400
<v Speaker 1>largely took place in Brazil, and because Brazil was so

0:09:39.440 --> 0:09:42.920
<v Speaker 1>far removed from all the other areas that we're looking

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 1>into this mostly in Europe, his work remained largely unknown

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:51.520
<v Speaker 1>until the nineteen seventies. And I would like to notice

0:09:51.640 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 1>is his really interesting work. It's something to look into.

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:58.640
<v Speaker 1>He had some nice photographs. Yeah. Yeah, And and our

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:04.200
<v Speaker 1>next fellow who made a big impression on photography is

0:10:04.240 --> 0:10:06.800
<v Speaker 1>one that probably most people have heard, at least heard

0:10:06.840 --> 0:10:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the technology named after him. That would be uh, Louis Jacquemond,

0:10:12.800 --> 0:10:18.840
<v Speaker 1>the gear type. Yeah. So he used the camera obscura

0:10:18.840 --> 0:10:21.640
<v Speaker 1>in a plate of iodized silver, which would allow him

0:10:21.640 --> 0:10:23.640
<v Speaker 1>to create a latent image of a scene. That's what

0:10:23.720 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 1>Dylan was talking about just a minute ago. And he

0:10:27.160 --> 0:10:30.200
<v Speaker 1>found that if you expose that plate to mercury vapor,

0:10:30.240 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the exposed parts of the image, the ones that had

0:10:32.640 --> 0:10:37.880
<v Speaker 1>been exposed to light, would become visible, so it would develop.

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:41.440
<v Speaker 1>This is where we start talking about developing photographs, and

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:44.960
<v Speaker 1>that approach reduced the exposure times needed eventually from eight

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:49.520
<v Speaker 1>hours down to around half an hour ish um using

0:10:49.520 --> 0:10:51.800
<v Speaker 1>this particular approach, But there was a drawback. If the

0:10:51.880 --> 0:10:55.600
<v Speaker 1>developed picture was exposed to light, like after you've taken it,

0:10:56.120 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>then the unexposed areas of silver would continue to darken

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:02.120
<v Speaker 1>and eventually the image would become impossible to see. Dylan

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:03.640
<v Speaker 1>and I will be back in just a moment to

0:11:03.720 --> 0:11:08.120
<v Speaker 1>talk more about photo editing and manipulation after these messages.

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Imagine that you have a photograph in your hand and

0:11:19.160 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 1>you take it out anywhere where there's light, and it

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 1>would just gradually become a dark picture, like there will

0:11:25.640 --> 0:11:29.600
<v Speaker 1>be no no, no way of distinguishing what was there before. Yeah,

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Like like before you expose film and a film camera,

0:11:33.040 --> 0:11:35.000
<v Speaker 1>if anyone's ever done that, you have to go into

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:37.520
<v Speaker 1>a pitch black room to do so because once you

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:41.880
<v Speaker 1>open the back of the light tight camera, when if

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:44.840
<v Speaker 1>you have that film exposed to the you know, to light,

0:11:44.920 --> 0:11:47.120
<v Speaker 1>it's it's just gonna go completely dark. You're not going

0:11:47.200 --> 0:11:50.320
<v Speaker 1>to be able to take any photographs with that role

0:11:50.360 --> 0:11:52.680
<v Speaker 1>of film right now, Dylan, have you ever worked in

0:11:52.679 --> 0:11:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the dark room? I have, yes, So what is what

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:57.439
<v Speaker 1>is it like when you are doing something like that,

0:11:57.480 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Like you know, the we've seen movies with the process

0:12:00.640 --> 0:12:03.840
<v Speaker 1>where you've got the people with like the three or

0:12:03.920 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 1>four different little basins filled with fluid and there's never

0:12:08.320 --> 0:12:12.320
<v Speaker 1>any explanation of what was actually happening. It is it's

0:12:12.360 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 1>an updated version of something like the GEA was doing.

0:12:16.080 --> 0:12:19.560
<v Speaker 1>The chemicals are a lot less dangerous, Yeah right, we're

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:22.240
<v Speaker 1>not using mercury rap, You're a lot less likely to

0:12:22.280 --> 0:12:25.880
<v Speaker 1>go crazy or catch on fire. Yes, yes, but it's

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:28.800
<v Speaker 1>a it's a process. But it's something that I think

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:32.600
<v Speaker 1>if you're interested in photography, you should. You should try

0:12:32.640 --> 0:12:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the development process, um because from going into the closet

0:12:37.559 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 1>to load your film, figuring out how to open something

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and put it in the back of the camera in

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 1>Pitch Black, is is a lot of it's frustrating, but

0:12:48.160 --> 0:12:51.079
<v Speaker 1>it's a lot of fun. And then you you know,

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:54.040
<v Speaker 1>even to the I don't want to get to ahead

0:12:54.080 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 1>of us, but the photo the process of taking the

0:12:57.440 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 1>photographs a lot different because you realize you have, like

0:13:00.040 --> 0:13:04.400
<v Speaker 1>of the thirties six shots and so it's it's not

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:06.600
<v Speaker 1>like on your phone or on your digital camera, which

0:13:06.640 --> 0:13:10.280
<v Speaker 1>is which is great freedom, but you think I paid

0:13:10.400 --> 0:13:13.560
<v Speaker 1>I paid money for this film, and it makes you

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:16.640
<v Speaker 1>much more selective and careful. And and not only that,

0:13:16.679 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 1>but I mean even that is a huge step from

0:13:20.440 --> 0:13:24.120
<v Speaker 1>what we're talking about here, where taking a single image

0:13:24.120 --> 0:13:28.160
<v Speaker 1>required so much effort just the not just the taking it,

0:13:28.240 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 1>but the developing of that single image took so much

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 1>effort that obviously the composition of your shot was really

0:13:34.080 --> 0:13:37.680
<v Speaker 1>important and if you mess that up, you're talking about

0:13:37.679 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 1>a day's work. In some cases, that's a lot of

0:13:40.920 --> 0:13:43.240
<v Speaker 1>for one image. It's it's easy for us to forget

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:47.120
<v Speaker 1>that in the realm of selfies that we have today. Yeah,

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 1>so I'll definitely be relying upon you heavily when we

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:55.200
<v Speaker 1>start talking about manipulation in this world. But to get

0:13:55.240 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 1>back to the history, just a couple more points I

0:13:57.400 --> 0:14:00.440
<v Speaker 1>want to make. Uh, so we've got to air who

0:14:00.480 --> 0:14:04.559
<v Speaker 1>starts solving the problem of this image immediately disappearing if

0:14:04.559 --> 0:14:07.640
<v Speaker 1>you were to expose it to light by using ordinary

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:12.160
<v Speaker 1>table salt. Actually, yeah, he put it in a water solution.

0:14:12.160 --> 0:14:14.640
<v Speaker 1>You got your sodium chloride solution. He would use that

0:14:14.720 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 1>to dissolve the unexposed silver iodide that was left on

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the paper. So that way the exposed stuff had already

0:14:22.080 --> 0:14:25.080
<v Speaker 1>been exposed. It's fine, you dissolve everything else, so now

0:14:25.320 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 1>that stuff can't end up going dark, and you're left

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:32.360
<v Speaker 1>with your image, and you could fix it permanently because

0:14:32.480 --> 0:14:36.120
<v Speaker 1>light can no longer ruin them. And uh, Eventually the

0:14:36.200 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Gara would find a way of producing photographs on silvered

0:14:39.640 --> 0:14:43.440
<v Speaker 1>copper plate, which was kind of his his medium of

0:14:43.520 --> 0:14:47.840
<v Speaker 1>choice from that point forward. Meanwhile, there was another fellow,

0:14:47.880 --> 0:14:51.160
<v Speaker 1>William Henry Fox Talbot, who was working on a different

0:14:51.200 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 1>approach to create photographic images of scientific observations. The reason

0:14:56.440 --> 0:14:59.200
<v Speaker 1>all right, he was a scientist, not he wasn't necessarily

0:14:59.200 --> 0:15:02.440
<v Speaker 1>interested in photogra if he originally he was interested in science.

0:15:02.560 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 1>But he had a problem. He couldn't draw at all.

0:15:07.600 --> 0:15:10.080
<v Speaker 1>He had like he would try all these sort of

0:15:10.120 --> 0:15:12.240
<v Speaker 1>things so that he would just trace using a camera.

0:15:12.280 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 1>Obscura didn't matter. He found himself incapable of doing that.

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:21.080
<v Speaker 1>I find myself sympathizing heavily with him. I have a

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:24.240
<v Speaker 1>distinct lack of artistic ability when it comes to that.

0:15:24.720 --> 0:15:27.960
<v Speaker 1>So he wanted to find a way to preserve scientific

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:31.640
<v Speaker 1>observations exactly as they were and record them in a

0:15:31.680 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 1>way that would not require him to draw in any way, shape,

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:38.480
<v Speaker 1>or fashion. So he started to look into a way

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:43.720
<v Speaker 1>to create photographic prints on paper, not using plates like

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 1>the gear was using. So he used paper soaked in

0:15:47.120 --> 0:15:50.400
<v Speaker 1>solutions of sodium chloride and silver nitrate in order to

0:15:50.440 --> 0:15:54.840
<v Speaker 1>produce silver chloride infused paper. And if he exposed that

0:15:54.880 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 1>paper to light, it would cause the exposed parts to

0:15:56.840 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>become dark, and that would create a negative image. If

0:15:59.200 --> 0:16:02.360
<v Speaker 1>he took another sheet of this and put it against

0:16:02.480 --> 0:16:04.920
<v Speaker 1>the one that had been exposed, and then exposed that

0:16:05.000 --> 0:16:08.120
<v Speaker 1>to light, that would create a positive image. On the

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:11.360
<v Speaker 1>second sheet, and for the first time you could get

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:15.520
<v Speaker 1>hypothetically more than one print from a picture. Yes, you

0:16:15.560 --> 0:16:18.760
<v Speaker 1>were not limited to whatever the original plate was. Now

0:16:18.800 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>you could produce multiple prints, assuming that everything stayed intact.

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Through this process, which was painstaking, it was still not

0:16:27.480 --> 0:16:30.320
<v Speaker 1>easy to do um and in fact, there were times

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 1>where it took some experimentation with this approach to get

0:16:34.440 --> 0:16:37.160
<v Speaker 1>it to work just right, because often they were having

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 1>quality issues with transferring the image from the negative to

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:46.400
<v Speaker 1>the the secondary sheet. And it wasn't until thirty nine

0:16:46.400 --> 0:16:48.880
<v Speaker 1>that Talbot felt that he had really nailed it. He

0:16:48.920 --> 0:16:51.560
<v Speaker 1>had actually talked with his friend and astronomer named Sir

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 1>John herschel Uh in a way to fix the negatives

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:58.240
<v Speaker 1>using sodium thiosulfate which at the time they called sodium

0:16:58.320 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 1>hypo sulfate, and found that that was what allowed it.

0:17:01.600 --> 0:17:06.080
<v Speaker 1>And then then he heard about the gear and he thought, oh,

0:17:06.119 --> 0:17:08.920
<v Speaker 1>because this is the era of everyone trying to get

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:11.480
<v Speaker 1>patents for things to protect their ideas so that other

0:17:11.520 --> 0:17:14.240
<v Speaker 1>folks don't just run away with them. So he immediately

0:17:14.320 --> 0:17:18.520
<v Speaker 1>rushes to publication to beat the French to the punch

0:17:18.840 --> 0:17:21.840
<v Speaker 1>because he knew that the French publication about the Gears

0:17:21.920 --> 0:17:24.720
<v Speaker 1>work was coming, so he said, well, I can't drag

0:17:24.760 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 1>my feet on this and rushed ahead. Uh and this

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 1>is a story we hear over and over again in technology.

0:17:30.359 --> 0:17:32.959
<v Speaker 1>It's not you know. Radio was another big one like that,

0:17:33.160 --> 0:17:39.560
<v Speaker 1>so television as well. So eighteen forty was the March.

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Eighteen forty was really when the first photography studio that

0:17:44.520 --> 0:17:48.520
<v Speaker 1>we know of opened, And it was in New York

0:17:48.600 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 1>City and it was it was called the Dagaron Parlor

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and it was operated by Alexander Woolcott. And uh so

0:17:58.760 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 1>you finally had a place. It was open to the public.

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:06.120
<v Speaker 1>It was no longer these uh, the scientists, physicists, researchers

0:18:06.200 --> 0:18:09.359
<v Speaker 1>and others who were all interested in this concept. Now

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:13.399
<v Speaker 1>it was something that ordinary people could have some access to,

0:18:14.040 --> 0:18:20.200
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of a long road to making photography very personal. Yes,

0:18:20.280 --> 0:18:25.720
<v Speaker 1>and also the birth of our era of narcissism. That's

0:18:25.720 --> 0:18:30.440
<v Speaker 1>probably being unkind, uh andund Around this time you also

0:18:30.480 --> 0:18:34.399
<v Speaker 1>started to see improvements in both lens design, camera design,

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:38.760
<v Speaker 1>and the chemical processes that meant that development time had

0:18:38.800 --> 0:18:42.040
<v Speaker 1>decreased significantly enough where you could sit for a portrait

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:46.040
<v Speaker 1>without having to stay absolutely still for three hours, which

0:18:47.160 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>that's good, you know. Suddenly, suddenly portraiture became more of

0:18:53.119 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 1>an attainable thing for families, and it became very popular

0:18:57.119 --> 0:19:01.040
<v Speaker 1>pretty early on, especially by the eighteen sixties to the

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:04.040
<v Speaker 1>eighteen eighties, it became it was a huge movement at

0:19:04.040 --> 0:19:07.680
<v Speaker 1>that point. And there are lots more things that happened

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:10.240
<v Speaker 1>from that point forward. Obviously, there was the development of

0:19:10.320 --> 0:19:13.680
<v Speaker 1>calo type, which is a negative development process that Talbot

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:18.440
<v Speaker 1>had created that made photography on paper more practical by

0:19:18.440 --> 0:19:22.120
<v Speaker 1>reducing the exposure times down to one minute. Pretty incredible

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:26.280
<v Speaker 1>at the time. Stereoscopic photography became a thing. That's when

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:30.360
<v Speaker 1>you take two images using cameras or lenses that approximate

0:19:30.400 --> 0:19:34.000
<v Speaker 1>the distance of a person's eyes. One of those, oh

0:19:34.359 --> 0:19:38.520
<v Speaker 1>you did, and that was very popular during the Civil War. Yes,

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:40.640
<v Speaker 1>it was exactly. Yeah, you would take you would take

0:19:40.640 --> 0:19:43.520
<v Speaker 1>these two images and then you would use something called

0:19:43.600 --> 0:19:47.159
<v Speaker 1>usually called a stereoscope, which was essentially a kind of

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:50.600
<v Speaker 1>a pair of glasses that held the two images at

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:53.120
<v Speaker 1>a certain distance from your eyes, so when you looked

0:19:53.160 --> 0:19:55.600
<v Speaker 1>at it, it creates the illusion of depth. It's essentially

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:58.040
<v Speaker 1>a primitive three D and a lot of them you

0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:02.760
<v Speaker 1>could adjust the lenses back and forth until the image

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 1>came in focus for you. Right, Yeah, because of course

0:20:05.320 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 1>not everyone is like our Our focal points are a

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 1>little different. Uh. It's the same thing that we see

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:14.880
<v Speaker 1>now with various headsets where you have ways to adjust

0:20:14.920 --> 0:20:16.840
<v Speaker 1>the lenses so that if your eyes are a little

0:20:16.920 --> 0:20:19.159
<v Speaker 1>set a little further apart, are a little closer together,

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:24.119
<v Speaker 1>because a tiny difference from the average can mean you

0:20:24.160 --> 0:20:27.200
<v Speaker 1>have a very different experience than someone who is closer.

0:20:27.240 --> 0:20:29.080
<v Speaker 1>To the end, you can still do the exact same

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:31.399
<v Speaker 1>thing on a digital s l R through the viewfinder.

0:20:31.680 --> 0:20:34.360
<v Speaker 1>Everybody can just set it up for because sometimes you'll

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:36.919
<v Speaker 1>pick up someone else's and and you're like, wow, this

0:20:36.960 --> 0:20:41.080
<v Speaker 1>person has very different eyes than I do. And also

0:20:41.280 --> 0:20:44.600
<v Speaker 1>you can get a very similar effect to this using Uh.

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 1>There there are apps on phones now that do essentially

0:20:48.240 --> 0:20:50.600
<v Speaker 1>the same thing that this is doing, only they're using

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:55.200
<v Speaker 1>the the software in an app that like a Google

0:20:55.280 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 1>Cardboard is an example where you actually go and you

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:01.359
<v Speaker 1>buy a little cardboard headset and you turn your phone

0:21:01.800 --> 0:21:06.040
<v Speaker 1>landscape side, you activate the Google Cardboard app, you slide

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:08.159
<v Speaker 1>it into the headset, and now you've got your own

0:21:08.160 --> 0:21:10.880
<v Speaker 1>little virtual reality headset. It's based on the exact same

0:21:10.920 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 1>principle as this photography. It's just in that case you're

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:16.639
<v Speaker 1>talking about more like video animation that kind of stuff

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:20.160
<v Speaker 1>rather than still photography, but it's the same idea. Then

0:21:20.160 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 1>there was the wet Colodeon process, which I don't know

0:21:23.320 --> 0:21:26.840
<v Speaker 1>if I'm even saying that correctly. Yes, Oh, excellent, that

0:21:26.920 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 1>was used to make glass negatives and was much faster

0:21:29.359 --> 0:21:33.960
<v Speaker 1>than earlier methods, provided that you were able to work quickly. Yeah,

0:21:34.119 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean you it it kind of birth digital. I

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 1>mean not that it kind of birthed the portable dark room. Yeah,

0:21:41.400 --> 0:21:44.240
<v Speaker 1>because if you had everything with you, you could do

0:21:44.280 --> 0:21:47.560
<v Speaker 1>it in like fifteen minutes, that's which was incredible speed

0:21:47.600 --> 0:21:50.399
<v Speaker 1>compared to the previous methods. Yeah, and you could have

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:55.440
<v Speaker 1>huge glass plates. Yeah, so you can make enormous negatives. Wow.

0:21:56.040 --> 0:22:01.400
<v Speaker 1>So the challenge here is that the the method relied

0:22:01.520 --> 0:22:04.719
<v Speaker 1>upon the glass retaining that that moisture on it that

0:22:04.800 --> 0:22:08.080
<v Speaker 1>was used for the process, and if it dried out,

0:22:08.119 --> 0:22:10.680
<v Speaker 1>then your negative was ruined. So you had to work

0:22:10.760 --> 0:22:13.160
<v Speaker 1>quickly in order for you to be able to take

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 1>advantage of this. But on the flip side, the process

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:19.720
<v Speaker 1>itself was very fast, So that was a big advance

0:22:19.800 --> 0:22:21.640
<v Speaker 1>and then there was an even larger one a little

0:22:21.640 --> 0:22:24.280
<v Speaker 1>bit later, which was the dry plate technology. I was

0:22:24.320 --> 0:22:28.480
<v Speaker 1>developed by an English physician named Wretcher Richard Leech Maddox

0:22:28.520 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 1>in eight seventy one UM, which eliminates some of the

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:33.680
<v Speaker 1>drawbacks of the glass approach. You didn't have to have

0:22:34.200 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>the plate remain wet for the whole process. We'll have

0:22:38.760 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 1>a bit more to talk about with photo editing and

0:22:40.920 --> 0:22:54.000
<v Speaker 1>manipulation after this quick break. Early manipulation, sometimes it was

0:22:54.200 --> 0:22:56.520
<v Speaker 1>again it was perfectly innocent. It might be that you

0:22:56.600 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 1>take an image and you look at the negative and

0:22:59.080 --> 0:23:01.320
<v Speaker 1>you realize from the net negative that there is a

0:23:01.359 --> 0:23:04.320
<v Speaker 1>flaw of some sort, So you might alter the negative

0:23:04.359 --> 0:23:07.160
<v Speaker 1>a little bit before creating a print so that you

0:23:07.200 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 1>can compensate for some error that was made. Either the

0:23:11.119 --> 0:23:14.320
<v Speaker 1>exposure wasn't quite right, the lighting wasn't quite right, or

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:16.840
<v Speaker 1>the subject moved or whatever. That may be the same

0:23:16.840 --> 0:23:20.719
<v Speaker 1>thing that we do today. Yeah, So it's not necessarily

0:23:22.160 --> 0:23:27.800
<v Speaker 1>a sinister or unethical uh motivation to manipulate a photo,

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:31.600
<v Speaker 1>but there are those as well. So if you look

0:23:31.680 --> 0:23:34.679
<v Speaker 1>at some of the earlier edits, sometimes it meant that

0:23:34.760 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 1>you would alter the negative. As I had mentioned, sometimes

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:41.400
<v Speaker 1>you would alter a print, um, in which case you might.

0:23:41.520 --> 0:23:44.240
<v Speaker 1>In fact, early because we were limited to black and

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:49.280
<v Speaker 1>white photography, you had some people who would present make photographs.

0:23:49.280 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 1>So make a make a print of a photograph or

0:23:51.359 --> 0:23:53.600
<v Speaker 1>a negative rather and then turn it over to an

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 1>artist who might actually add color by painting over the photograph.

0:23:57.640 --> 0:24:00.600
<v Speaker 1>You want blue skies, you know, you a little pan

0:24:00.720 --> 0:24:03.320
<v Speaker 1>on there. Yeah. Yeah, it's the best solution to the

0:24:03.359 --> 0:24:06.240
<v Speaker 1>problem at the time. So that was a type of

0:24:06.280 --> 0:24:08.320
<v Speaker 1>photo manipulation. I mean, it was one that everyone was

0:24:08.359 --> 0:24:11.720
<v Speaker 1>aware of, but it was still a way of manipulating

0:24:11.760 --> 0:24:15.080
<v Speaker 1>the photos. Uh. You could also do things like you

0:24:15.119 --> 0:24:19.639
<v Speaker 1>could do a composite uh picture where that's a little

0:24:19.640 --> 0:24:23.760
<v Speaker 1>bit odd. Honestly, this was one of those things that

0:24:24.160 --> 0:24:27.160
<v Speaker 1>I understand the basics of, but I don't know how

0:24:27.200 --> 0:24:29.440
<v Speaker 1>it would actually happen. But generally speaking, you would use

0:24:29.480 --> 0:24:33.760
<v Speaker 1>two or more negatives to produce a single print, and

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:36.679
<v Speaker 1>there were a lot of composites out there for They

0:24:36.720 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 1>were done for various reasons, sometimes in order to include

0:24:40.880 --> 0:24:43.239
<v Speaker 1>a person who was not able to be present at

0:24:43.240 --> 0:24:48.200
<v Speaker 1>a particular photo session, or to create a particular artistic feel.

0:24:48.280 --> 0:24:53.440
<v Speaker 1>There's some really famous artists who composed amazing pictures using

0:24:53.480 --> 0:24:56.040
<v Speaker 1>as many as fifty or more negatives in order to

0:24:56.160 --> 0:24:59.159
<v Speaker 1>achieve it. And honestly, at that point, I'm like, you

0:24:59.200 --> 0:25:02.480
<v Speaker 1>guys aremagish. I don't know how this works. Yeah, I mean,

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:06.960
<v Speaker 1>as far as photo montage, photo manipulation goes, there are

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 1>people like Jerry Yulesman who goes into a dark room,

0:25:10.160 --> 0:25:13.000
<v Speaker 1>takes fifty negative splices them up with an exact o

0:25:13.160 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 1>knife and makes a print and you you can't tell.

0:25:15.600 --> 0:25:18.360
<v Speaker 1>It's like someone using photoshop in their wizard, but it's

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:22.959
<v Speaker 1>all analog. But early on you had you had Matthew Brady,

0:25:22.960 --> 0:25:24.800
<v Speaker 1>who I like to think of and I think a

0:25:24.880 --> 0:25:26.359
<v Speaker 1>lot of people think of him this way as the

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:31.119
<v Speaker 1>first celebrity photographer who had a studio, and he took

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:35.919
<v Speaker 1>portraits of almost every politician around that period around like

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:39.920
<v Speaker 1>the Civil War era, um and he had two very

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 1>famous manipulations, one that he did not do, but one

0:25:43.000 --> 0:25:45.360
<v Speaker 1>of his photographs was used for part of it. I'm

0:25:45.400 --> 0:25:49.479
<v Speaker 1>guessing that's the Lincoln one. The Lincoln portrait that is

0:25:49.600 --> 0:25:54.160
<v Speaker 1>his it's his head, um that Matthew Brady took that photograph.

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 1>It's the same one that's used on the five dollar

0:25:55.840 --> 0:25:59.879
<v Speaker 1>bill exactly. And the body was of John Calhoun was

0:26:00.080 --> 0:26:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Southerner entirely, and it was too. It was because during

0:26:06.240 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Lincoln's life they felt like they didn't have enough heroic

0:26:10.080 --> 0:26:14.480
<v Speaker 1>photographs of Lincoln. Yes, this is an iconic picture of

0:26:14.640 --> 0:26:17.320
<v Speaker 1>what appears to be Lincoln standing in front of a desk,

0:26:18.000 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 1>and there's like an American flag in the picture, and uh,

0:26:21.880 --> 0:26:26.000
<v Speaker 1>there's um, you know, it's a it's a very striking photograph,

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:29.120
<v Speaker 1>it is. And what's really interesting to me is even

0:26:29.160 --> 0:26:33.639
<v Speaker 1>back then, the amount of manipulation in that photograph, Uh,

0:26:33.680 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 1>that there are papers on the table, and when it

0:26:37.160 --> 0:26:41.359
<v Speaker 1>was a portrait of John Calhoun, the words on the

0:26:41.400 --> 0:26:45.119
<v Speaker 1>table that you could read where strict constitution, free trade,

0:26:45.240 --> 0:26:48.760
<v Speaker 1>and the sovereignty of the States. But the Lincoln version

0:26:48.880 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 1>says Constitution, Union and the Proclamation of Freedom. That's fascinating

0:26:55.480 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 1>that they were able to get to that level of

0:26:57.280 --> 0:27:01.479
<v Speaker 1>granularity in the change. And you know, there there are

0:27:01.520 --> 0:27:03.920
<v Speaker 1>lots of different ways of achieving this sort of stuff.

0:27:03.960 --> 0:27:05.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there was the you know, you could go

0:27:06.000 --> 0:27:08.920
<v Speaker 1>to the negative and you could change the negative by

0:27:08.960 --> 0:27:11.879
<v Speaker 1>splicing stuff together, and then producing a print, or you

0:27:11.920 --> 0:27:14.439
<v Speaker 1>could do something where you're literally cutting and pasting, but

0:27:14.480 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 1>you're doing it on the print, and then you take

0:27:16.359 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 1>a photograph of the print, developed that and that becomes

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:21.520
<v Speaker 1>your new photographs. So in other words, you can take

0:27:21.560 --> 0:27:25.760
<v Speaker 1>two pictures and you literally cut out the image of

0:27:25.880 --> 0:27:28.919
<v Speaker 1>something that you want from one, paste it over top

0:27:29.119 --> 0:27:32.639
<v Speaker 1>the image that already exists, take a photo of it,

0:27:32.760 --> 0:27:34.640
<v Speaker 1>develop it, and that could be a way of doing

0:27:34.640 --> 0:27:37.560
<v Speaker 1>it too. That's so interesting because that's something that I

0:27:37.560 --> 0:27:39.960
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of people did in elementary school, is

0:27:40.000 --> 0:27:42.320
<v Speaker 1>that they went through magazines for projects and I would

0:27:42.320 --> 0:27:44.560
<v Speaker 1>cut out one part and put it over another part.

0:27:44.800 --> 0:27:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Is very much like collage. It's yeah, and and there

0:27:47.520 --> 0:27:51.719
<v Speaker 1>was the picture Matthew Brady did of US S. S. Grant,

0:27:51.760 --> 0:27:53.679
<v Speaker 1>and that's supposed to be of him in front of

0:27:53.760 --> 0:27:57.720
<v Speaker 1>his troops in City Point, Virginia. Yeah, but it's not. No,

0:27:57.840 --> 0:28:01.560
<v Speaker 1>it's actually three different photos all meshed together. Uh. It's

0:28:02.119 --> 0:28:07.280
<v Speaker 1>it's the body of Major General Alexander M. M. Cook

0:28:08.119 --> 0:28:11.119
<v Speaker 1>And uh, then it's the head of Ulysses S. Grant

0:28:11.440 --> 0:28:13.159
<v Speaker 1>on top of the body. So the body is on

0:28:13.200 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 1>a horse, So it's Ulysses S. Grant on the body

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:19.159
<v Speaker 1>of this other general major general, and the people in

0:28:19.200 --> 0:28:23.000
<v Speaker 1>the background are not Union soldiers, their Confederate prisoners. Yeah,

0:28:23.160 --> 0:28:26.720
<v Speaker 1>so it's it's it's that's a very interesting photo especially.

0:28:26.720 --> 0:28:32.040
<v Speaker 1>I think that's an early example of UM. I wouldn't

0:28:32.080 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 1>say that it was meant to deceive as much, but

0:28:35.280 --> 0:28:38.920
<v Speaker 1>of maybe misinformation. Yeah, you could argue, you know, you

0:28:38.920 --> 0:28:41.720
<v Speaker 1>could call it propaganda if you like. It was really

0:28:41.800 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 1>meant to create again, this heroic image. In fact, a

0:28:45.880 --> 0:28:49.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of the pictures that for political manipulation are really

0:28:49.680 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 1>about elevating a particular person to make them seem more

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 1>iconic and or or eliminate things that elevated person no

0:28:59.120 --> 0:29:02.560
<v Speaker 1>longer liked. Very military based for the most well, yeah,

0:29:02.600 --> 0:29:05.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of a lot of military ones. Uh. Yeah.

0:29:05.200 --> 0:29:09.480
<v Speaker 1>There's also the the General Francis P. P. Blair being

0:29:09.520 --> 0:29:13.480
<v Speaker 1>added to a group of of other generals, including General Sherman.

0:29:13.720 --> 0:29:15.800
<v Speaker 1>So this is a group. If you see the two

0:29:15.800 --> 0:29:18.600
<v Speaker 1>different photos, you'll see one where there's a group of

0:29:19.000 --> 0:29:23.040
<v Speaker 1>generals sitting together, and then the second photo there's an

0:29:23.040 --> 0:29:26.240
<v Speaker 1>extra general sitting way off to the right. Yeah, that

0:29:26.320 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 1>was that other Matthew Brady image I was speaking of.

0:29:29.120 --> 0:29:32.760
<v Speaker 1>And it's also really well done. Yeah, yeah, I mean

0:29:33.080 --> 0:29:37.120
<v Speaker 1>it's he's he's definitely feels a little ostracized. But other

0:29:37.160 --> 0:29:39.720
<v Speaker 1>than that, it looks like he fits it does. Yeah,

0:29:40.040 --> 0:29:42.479
<v Speaker 1>maybe he wasn't. Maybe they felt like he wasn't as

0:29:42.520 --> 0:29:44.360
<v Speaker 1>important for it was a little bit over in the corner.

0:29:44.400 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna go sit up the kid's table and let

0:29:46.480 --> 0:29:49.160
<v Speaker 1>the adult generals talk about the war over here. Yeah,

0:29:49.200 --> 0:29:51.160
<v Speaker 1>but it looks good. Yeah, it does look good. And

0:29:51.600 --> 0:29:54.160
<v Speaker 1>that is also really interesting to me because it was

0:29:54.200 --> 0:29:57.840
<v Speaker 1>clear that even early on, those photographers who are working

0:29:57.880 --> 0:30:02.200
<v Speaker 1>with this medium and trying to you create these composite

0:30:02.240 --> 0:30:05.880
<v Speaker 1>images or manipulate these photos in some way already had

0:30:05.920 --> 0:30:08.560
<v Speaker 1>an innate understanding of if I want to do this

0:30:08.600 --> 0:30:11.560
<v Speaker 1>and make it look right, lighting is really important. I

0:30:11.600 --> 0:30:15.240
<v Speaker 1>can't ignore the fact that a scene lit from the

0:30:15.360 --> 0:30:18.640
<v Speaker 1>left and as subject who's lit from the right that

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I've added in later are going to look wrong. Yeah,

0:30:22.000 --> 0:30:24.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean they're even now. There are a lot of

0:30:24.800 --> 0:30:30.280
<v Speaker 1>photos released by by very professional agencies that don't take

0:30:30.400 --> 0:30:32.880
<v Speaker 1>as much of that into consideration as even some of

0:30:32.920 --> 0:30:35.479
<v Speaker 1>these people a d fifty years ago, right, and those

0:30:35.680 --> 0:30:38.959
<v Speaker 1>images get torn apart on Reddit. They do you can

0:30:39.000 --> 0:30:41.120
<v Speaker 1>go to Reddit and you'll just see people saying, well,

0:30:41.120 --> 0:30:42.880
<v Speaker 1>this is clearly photoshop because if you look at the

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:45.120
<v Speaker 1>shadows they're on the you know, blah blah blah blah blah,

0:30:45.240 --> 0:30:47.880
<v Speaker 1>you can tell that the lighting is higher into the

0:30:47.960 --> 0:30:50.440
<v Speaker 1>left instead of low into the right or whatever. In

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:53.600
<v Speaker 1>some cases it's really subtle and uh, and it's people

0:30:53.640 --> 0:30:56.160
<v Speaker 1>who have a greater attention span and better sense of

0:30:56.200 --> 0:30:59.760
<v Speaker 1>detail than idea. I'll look at it go like, holy cow,

0:30:59.840 --> 0:31:03.640
<v Speaker 1>you're right, Like I didn't notice it before. But yeah,

0:31:03.680 --> 0:31:05.560
<v Speaker 1>there's still some other really cool ones that I can

0:31:05.600 --> 0:31:09.320
<v Speaker 1>talk about. Like in eighteen seventy, photographer William H. Mummler

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:13.080
<v Speaker 1>used double exposure. So that's another way of editing and

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:15.320
<v Speaker 1>manipulating photos that we can talk about for a second.

0:31:15.640 --> 0:31:18.440
<v Speaker 1>He used double exposure to create what people have dubbed

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:23.040
<v Speaker 1>spirit photography. Now, double exposure is exactly what it sounds like.

0:31:23.080 --> 0:31:27.760
<v Speaker 1>It's exposing the same whatever photographic medium, whether it's film

0:31:27.880 --> 0:31:31.920
<v Speaker 1>or a plate or whatever, to light twice, so you

0:31:31.960 --> 0:31:35.080
<v Speaker 1>can create kind of a double image look. And usually

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:38.680
<v Speaker 1>one of those looks kind of transparent, like a weaker

0:31:38.720 --> 0:31:41.840
<v Speaker 1>image than the other one. And sometimes this was used

0:31:41.880 --> 0:31:44.080
<v Speaker 1>for artistic effect like that. I saw one that was

0:31:44.120 --> 0:31:46.880
<v Speaker 1>of an actor who in what in his in his

0:31:47.000 --> 0:31:51.160
<v Speaker 1>regular pose the darker pose, stood very tall and dignified,

0:31:51.200 --> 0:31:53.560
<v Speaker 1>and in the second post he's bent over with his

0:31:53.680 --> 0:31:56.400
<v Speaker 1>hands stretched out, kind of like a like a classic

0:31:56.480 --> 0:31:59.040
<v Speaker 1>universal monster. And the first thing I thought when I

0:31:59.040 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 1>saw it was that's a perfect photograph if you want

0:32:01.680 --> 0:32:04.840
<v Speaker 1>to get across the concept of Jekyl and hide. But

0:32:05.160 --> 0:32:07.400
<v Speaker 1>that was not what the intent was from what I

0:32:07.440 --> 0:32:09.080
<v Speaker 1>was reading. But as I saw it, I just thought

0:32:09.440 --> 0:32:12.480
<v Speaker 1>that was the immediate reaction I had. And Uh, in

0:32:12.520 --> 0:32:16.880
<v Speaker 1>this case, a mumbler used double exposures on a pretty

0:32:16.960 --> 0:32:20.959
<v Speaker 1>famous person, Mary Todd Lincoln. Yes, so there's this image

0:32:21.040 --> 0:32:25.840
<v Speaker 1>of Mary Todd seated and behind her is the ghostly

0:32:25.880 --> 0:32:28.840
<v Speaker 1>apparition of Abraham Lincoln and he even has his hands

0:32:28.960 --> 0:32:31.240
<v Speaker 1>on her shoulders and you could see through his hands

0:32:31.240 --> 0:32:34.959
<v Speaker 1>to her shoulders. It's pretty effective, and it helps because

0:32:35.000 --> 0:32:39.200
<v Speaker 1>he was lanky. It really does kindlish. Yeah, and and

0:32:39.240 --> 0:32:42.800
<v Speaker 1>again this is just achieved through double exposure. Some people

0:32:42.880 --> 0:32:45.959
<v Speaker 1>do this just for artistic effect. There have been cases

0:32:45.960 --> 0:32:50.640
<v Speaker 1>where people have used double exposure specifically to mislead or deceive,

0:32:51.320 --> 0:32:54.080
<v Speaker 1>but in this case, I wouldn't. I would. I would

0:32:54.120 --> 0:32:56.520
<v Speaker 1>argue that it wasn't necessarily meant to do that. It

0:32:56.600 --> 0:33:00.560
<v Speaker 1>was more of a memorium for someone at least that's

0:33:00.600 --> 0:33:04.160
<v Speaker 1>the implication. I feel. There were definitely ghost or spirit

0:33:04.200 --> 0:33:08.080
<v Speaker 1>photographers who took it a different way, and we're claiming

0:33:08.120 --> 0:33:14.000
<v Speaker 1>to get pictures of spirits. Yeah, like the ectoplasm uh

0:33:14.120 --> 0:33:16.880
<v Speaker 1>photography as well, just that whole I mean that that

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:19.440
<v Speaker 1>gets past photography. But there are a lot of pictures

0:33:19.440 --> 0:33:23.320
<v Speaker 1>with people with cheese cloths coming out of there, right, yeah,

0:33:23.400 --> 0:33:27.520
<v Speaker 1>cheese cloth. That's like that's a go to for hoaxer's. Um. Yeah,

0:33:27.560 --> 0:33:30.680
<v Speaker 1>And I promise when we get to we'll probably save

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 1>it for post digital. But I gotta talk to you

0:33:32.440 --> 0:33:35.400
<v Speaker 1>about orbs, So we'll chat about orbs in the post

0:33:35.400 --> 0:33:42.000
<v Speaker 1>digital section. But I've got my favorite story of PHO. No,

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:46.560
<v Speaker 1>it's not even photo manipulation, it's just trickery. I bet

0:33:46.600 --> 0:33:51.560
<v Speaker 1>it is. Does the year nineteen kind of fit into that? Fairies? Yes,

0:33:51.680 --> 0:33:56.560
<v Speaker 1>we're going to talk about the fairies. Okay, So Dylan,

0:33:56.600 --> 0:33:58.440
<v Speaker 1>you don't know this about me when I was but

0:33:58.560 --> 0:34:01.000
<v Speaker 1>it's not a surprise because I was a kid once.

0:34:01.160 --> 0:34:03.800
<v Speaker 1>When I was a kid, Uh, and I was going

0:34:03.800 --> 0:34:07.600
<v Speaker 1>to elementary school. I would check out all the books

0:34:07.640 --> 0:34:12.120
<v Speaker 1>on ghosts and monsters and folklore, and I would read

0:34:12.160 --> 0:34:16.360
<v Speaker 1>them cover to cover, and I would check him out again. Excellent.

0:34:16.640 --> 0:34:19.480
<v Speaker 1>So I will never forget when I was reading about

0:34:19.960 --> 0:34:24.239
<v Speaker 1>Sir Arthur Conan Doyle and two young girls and a

0:34:24.280 --> 0:34:27.319
<v Speaker 1>bunch of fairies out in the woods. And the two

0:34:27.360 --> 0:34:31.200
<v Speaker 1>young girls were cousins or Elsie Wright and Francis Griffiths,

0:34:31.239 --> 0:34:34.520
<v Speaker 1>and they had all these photographs of them sitting around

0:34:34.600 --> 0:34:40.719
<v Speaker 1>in Glenn's surrounded by fairies frolicking about. Yeah, the Coddingly

0:34:40.880 --> 0:34:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Fairies that was taken near Coddingly, England. Famous famous hoax

0:34:46.920 --> 0:34:50.440
<v Speaker 1>uh And Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, of course, the author

0:34:50.480 --> 0:34:53.359
<v Speaker 1>of the Sherlock Holmes Mysteries. He was for a long

0:34:53.440 --> 0:34:57.600
<v Speaker 1>time a hardcore skeptic, but then suffered some tragedy in

0:34:57.640 --> 0:35:02.279
<v Speaker 1>his life and started to turn to mysticism and spiritualists

0:35:02.280 --> 0:35:04.560
<v Speaker 1>in an effort to answer questions that he could not

0:35:04.600 --> 0:35:08.560
<v Speaker 1>answer himself. And there was sort of a decline. It

0:35:08.640 --> 0:35:11.560
<v Speaker 1>was very kind of ironic from someone who presented a

0:35:11.680 --> 0:35:17.120
<v Speaker 1>character who was as dispassionate and rationalist Sherlock Holmes. To

0:35:17.239 --> 0:35:20.160
<v Speaker 1>end up embracing the idea of these two girls who

0:35:20.280 --> 0:35:24.400
<v Speaker 1>had managed to capture images of fairies, And it wouldn't

0:35:24.400 --> 0:35:27.839
<v Speaker 1>be until near the end of their lives that they

0:35:27.880 --> 0:35:32.319
<v Speaker 1>revealed that all they did was take illustrations that were

0:35:32.320 --> 0:35:35.680
<v Speaker 1>from books and cut them out and paced them onto

0:35:35.719 --> 0:35:39.600
<v Speaker 1>cardboard and pose the cardboard around them and take photographs.

0:35:39.600 --> 0:35:43.480
<v Speaker 1>So they actually didn't do any manipulation at all. They

0:35:43.520 --> 0:35:46.920
<v Speaker 1>just set a scene and did I. I think it

0:35:46.920 --> 0:35:49.879
<v Speaker 1>wasn't until the late seventies or early eighties that one

0:35:49.960 --> 0:35:54.200
<v Speaker 1>of them admitted to it, and then the famous skeptic

0:35:54.280 --> 0:35:56.960
<v Speaker 1>James Randy also said that he was like, well, these

0:35:57.000 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 1>illustrations are exactly the same as these illustrations from this

0:36:01.200 --> 0:36:04.120
<v Speaker 1>book that came out in nineteen fifteen. Yeah. Yeah, he

0:36:04.120 --> 0:36:06.279
<v Speaker 1>he had a book called flim Flam where he talked

0:36:06.280 --> 0:36:09.960
<v Speaker 1>about it a lot. James Randy did. That was decades later. Yeah,

0:36:10.360 --> 0:36:14.000
<v Speaker 1>you have very much later. So that's that's crazy, because

0:36:14.040 --> 0:36:17.920
<v Speaker 1>they sent it that it folded a photographer named Harold Snelling,

0:36:18.120 --> 0:36:22.400
<v Speaker 1>and he said quote that they were genuine, unfaked photographs

0:36:22.400 --> 0:36:25.080
<v Speaker 1>of single exposure open air work show of movement and

0:36:25.200 --> 0:36:28.240
<v Speaker 1>all the fairy figures and there's no trace. Whatever studio

0:36:28.239 --> 0:36:32.440
<v Speaker 1>work involving card are paper models, dark backgrounds, painted figures,

0:36:32.480 --> 0:36:34.800
<v Speaker 1>et cetera. Yeah, so he was. He was writing the

0:36:34.840 --> 0:36:38.480
<v Speaker 1>sense there was single exposure, yes, but there was no movement.

0:36:38.560 --> 0:36:41.160
<v Speaker 1>They were paper figures. In fact, there were people who's

0:36:41.239 --> 0:36:43.640
<v Speaker 1>who when they really looked at the photos, they said,

0:36:44.080 --> 0:36:47.480
<v Speaker 1>you can see evidence of some movement in the human subjects,

0:36:47.719 --> 0:36:50.680
<v Speaker 1>but the fairies, who presumably would be moving much faster

0:36:50.680 --> 0:36:53.560
<v Speaker 1>because some of them are like mid leap or flight

0:36:53.719 --> 0:36:57.239
<v Speaker 1>or whatever, there's no blurring around them. And again, the

0:36:57.280 --> 0:37:00.080
<v Speaker 1>exposure time at this point it was still relative a

0:37:00.160 --> 0:37:03.160
<v Speaker 1>long much longer than say the cameras that would be

0:37:03.239 --> 0:37:06.720
<v Speaker 1>used a few decades later, and so any fast movement

0:37:06.719 --> 0:37:10.240
<v Speaker 1>would be very blurry. It wouldn't come across so sharp

0:37:10.280 --> 0:37:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and crisp as these photos did. But they were very

0:37:13.200 --> 0:37:15.480
<v Speaker 1>compelling at the time, and a lot of people bought

0:37:15.520 --> 0:37:19.000
<v Speaker 1>into it, including Sir Arthur Knan Doyle. Uh. And I've

0:37:19.040 --> 0:37:21.200
<v Speaker 1>got another one. In nineteen twenty four. We have a

0:37:21.239 --> 0:37:24.080
<v Speaker 1>fellow by the name of Bernard McFadden who creates a

0:37:24.080 --> 0:37:27.799
<v Speaker 1>technique called composed a graph. Do you know of McFadden,

0:37:28.120 --> 0:37:31.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't. I don't believe so let me take you

0:37:31.960 --> 0:37:39.120
<v Speaker 1>down the lurid, dirty, dirty path to tabloid journalism, because

0:37:39.160 --> 0:37:43.399
<v Speaker 1>this is tabloid journalism at its most skiezy. So here

0:37:43.480 --> 0:37:49.120
<v Speaker 1>here's McFadden. He is working on a tabloid magazine called

0:37:49.160 --> 0:37:55.320
<v Speaker 1>New York Evening Graphic, which some people nicknamed porno Graphic.

0:37:56.840 --> 0:37:59.520
<v Speaker 1>So what he would do is there would be news

0:37:59.520 --> 0:38:05.400
<v Speaker 1>stories of various uh public figures, whether celebrities, politicians, whatever,

0:38:05.760 --> 0:38:09.279
<v Speaker 1>sports stars, whatever it may be, and there'd be a

0:38:09.320 --> 0:38:12.400
<v Speaker 1>story of some scandal. Like again, this is a tabloid,

0:38:12.440 --> 0:38:15.520
<v Speaker 1>so they're all about scandal. What he would do is

0:38:15.560 --> 0:38:18.960
<v Speaker 1>he would take images, uh like of people's faces in

0:38:19.000 --> 0:38:24.280
<v Speaker 1>these stories. Then he would pose um body doubles, sometimes

0:38:24.280 --> 0:38:29.240
<v Speaker 1>mannequins sometimes they were staffers of the magazine into a tableau,

0:38:29.440 --> 0:38:32.520
<v Speaker 1>take a picture, and then do a paste of the

0:38:32.600 --> 0:38:35.920
<v Speaker 1>famous people's heads on top of the figures that he

0:38:35.960 --> 0:38:39.920
<v Speaker 1>had posed, and then do things like a superimposed word

0:38:40.000 --> 0:38:44.279
<v Speaker 1>balloon on top of it to express some statement that

0:38:44.440 --> 0:38:51.799
<v Speaker 1>went along with the scandalous story. Wow, I mean, how

0:38:51.840 --> 0:38:55.080
<v Speaker 1>could it be skisier than like today's tabloids. But that's

0:38:55.200 --> 0:38:58.480
<v Speaker 1>that's that's on. That's just right there. I don't know

0:38:58.520 --> 0:39:00.400
<v Speaker 1>if you've ever seen have you ever seen any of

0:39:00.440 --> 0:39:04.799
<v Speaker 1>the computer animated videos that come out of It's some

0:39:04.960 --> 0:39:08.719
<v Speaker 1>Asian country, but it's but it's the retelling of famous story. Yeah,

0:39:08.960 --> 0:39:13.840
<v Speaker 1>same principle here, except he was doing it with still photography. Yeah.

0:39:13.920 --> 0:39:16.880
<v Speaker 1>And uh so that by the way, that that tabloid

0:39:16.880 --> 0:39:19.000
<v Speaker 1>did not last too long. I think in the early

0:39:19.080 --> 0:39:22.440
<v Speaker 1>nineteen thirties that it folded and it went bankrupt. But

0:39:22.680 --> 0:39:27.680
<v Speaker 1>um definitely was one of those means of photo manipulation

0:39:27.760 --> 0:39:31.200
<v Speaker 1>that gave the whole the whole concept of bad name.

0:39:31.800 --> 0:39:34.760
<v Speaker 1>So there were the political ones we had talked about previously,

0:39:34.800 --> 0:39:36.680
<v Speaker 1>then there was this one where I mean it's just

0:39:36.719 --> 0:39:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the beginning of a long line of commercial uses of

0:39:40.440 --> 0:39:45.600
<v Speaker 1>photo manipulation and photo editing in order to sell papers. Essentially,

0:39:45.600 --> 0:39:47.680
<v Speaker 1>it is what it gets down to, yeah, or or

0:39:48.200 --> 0:39:53.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, to kind of cause harm to someone's image. Yeah.

0:39:53.160 --> 0:39:55.759
<v Speaker 1>That that that that was the genesis of that, And

0:39:55.800 --> 0:40:00.400
<v Speaker 1>that's something that every time that political campaign come around

0:40:00.480 --> 0:40:03.480
<v Speaker 1>every four years, you have to be extra weary of

0:40:03.520 --> 0:40:07.279
<v Speaker 1>the photographs that start uh circulating. Yeah. And and not

0:40:07.360 --> 0:40:12.360
<v Speaker 1>only that, but you'll see artists will use it, usually transparently.

0:40:12.520 --> 0:40:16.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean the artist approach normally is not to create

0:40:16.000 --> 0:40:19.040
<v Speaker 1>an image that you think is real. The artist's intent

0:40:19.320 --> 0:40:21.600
<v Speaker 1>might be to make a statement about a particular person.

0:40:21.840 --> 0:40:25.279
<v Speaker 1>I remember seeing one artist who had created a photograph

0:40:25.320 --> 0:40:28.040
<v Speaker 1>and it was of a crowd out on the street,

0:40:28.520 --> 0:40:32.239
<v Speaker 1>and then overtop the crowd was this inky looking octopus

0:40:32.800 --> 0:40:38.080
<v Speaker 1>with the head of William Randolph Hearst. So obviously the

0:40:38.120 --> 0:40:42.800
<v Speaker 1>comment being that Hearst is manipulating the public through the media,

0:40:43.200 --> 0:40:47.880
<v Speaker 1>and obviously he's not inky, so nor does he have

0:40:47.920 --> 0:40:51.600
<v Speaker 1>eight appendages, so that makes sense. He had terrible taste

0:40:51.760 --> 0:40:54.640
<v Speaker 1>in home decor. I'll say that as someone who's walked

0:40:54.640 --> 0:40:57.120
<v Speaker 1>through the Hearst Castle. This was clearly a guy who

0:40:57.160 --> 0:40:59.359
<v Speaker 1>had so much money. He just said, I like that thing.

0:40:59.400 --> 0:41:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Put it in my else. It doesn't matter if baroque,

0:41:03.320 --> 0:41:05.719
<v Speaker 1>don't care if it's If it's broken Gothic in the

0:41:05.760 --> 0:41:09.040
<v Speaker 1>same room along with some even older stuff and some

0:41:09.080 --> 0:41:13.360
<v Speaker 1>newer stuff, that's fine. And I who have no taste

0:41:13.360 --> 0:41:15.440
<v Speaker 1>would walk through and go like, y'all, this is Tachi.

0:41:17.800 --> 0:41:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Stay tuned for the exciting conclusion of this tech stuff

0:41:20.880 --> 0:41:33.319
<v Speaker 1>classic episode right after we take this break. So let's

0:41:33.320 --> 0:41:36.960
<v Speaker 1>talk a little bit about not not adding stuff in

0:41:37.320 --> 0:41:41.880
<v Speaker 1>but taking stuff away also. That became pretty prevalent around

0:41:42.120 --> 0:41:45.200
<v Speaker 1>that same period of time, the nineteen twenties, that was

0:41:45.280 --> 0:41:49.719
<v Speaker 1>a big period of time for well, World War One,

0:41:49.719 --> 0:41:53.200
<v Speaker 1>World War two, that that kind of period in time. Yeah,

0:41:53.600 --> 0:41:57.319
<v Speaker 1>we had a lot of um of famous leaders who

0:41:57.400 --> 0:42:02.560
<v Speaker 1>had finnicky attitudes towards their followers, and when they would

0:42:03.160 --> 0:42:06.120
<v Speaker 1>get a little peeved that said followers, they would attempt

0:42:06.160 --> 0:42:10.239
<v Speaker 1>to erase said followers from history entirely. Not just not

0:42:10.400 --> 0:42:12.920
<v Speaker 1>just execute the person. That's not good enough. They have

0:42:13.000 --> 0:42:16.080
<v Speaker 1>to erase the fact that that person ever existed, including

0:42:16.080 --> 0:42:21.239
<v Speaker 1>removing them from photographs and some examples. Yeah, sometimes you

0:42:21.320 --> 0:42:24.040
<v Speaker 1>get removed from a photograph and you'd also be dead. Yes,

0:42:24.360 --> 0:42:26.839
<v Speaker 1>sometimes sometimes they would kill you first and then say,

0:42:26.880 --> 0:42:28.479
<v Speaker 1>all right, well now that he's dead, let's go ahead

0:42:28.480 --> 0:42:34.480
<v Speaker 1>and remove him from all the official photographs, like press photos,

0:42:34.520 --> 0:42:37.399
<v Speaker 1>things like that. Big famous example of this would be

0:42:37.480 --> 0:42:43.520
<v Speaker 1>a photo that originally had Nikolai Yazkov or Yeshov rather

0:42:44.280 --> 0:42:50.480
<v Speaker 1>posing with Joseph Stalin. This is the Vanishing Commissar photograph,

0:42:50.719 --> 0:42:53.880
<v Speaker 1>and um it's a picture of a group of gentlemen

0:42:53.960 --> 0:42:58.560
<v Speaker 1>including Mr Stalin, uh and yes Hoff and yes I'm

0:42:58.640 --> 0:43:02.440
<v Speaker 1>standing right next to um a wall that leads right

0:43:02.440 --> 0:43:05.839
<v Speaker 1>over to a river, and Staalin's immediately to his right,

0:43:06.280 --> 0:43:11.480
<v Speaker 1>and then the retouched photo he's gone. Yeah. An example

0:43:11.520 --> 0:43:14.759
<v Speaker 1>of air brushing. Yeah, air brushing exactly. So. An airbrush

0:43:15.120 --> 0:43:18.520
<v Speaker 1>is a tool that uses air to push through some

0:43:18.640 --> 0:43:21.520
<v Speaker 1>form of paint or ink or whatever it may be,

0:43:21.960 --> 0:43:24.279
<v Speaker 1>in order for you to do some uh, you know,

0:43:24.440 --> 0:43:29.960
<v Speaker 1>analog hand controlled art. And in some cases it could

0:43:29.960 --> 0:43:33.480
<v Speaker 1>be to hide something that was once there. Yeah, Like

0:43:33.520 --> 0:43:36.120
<v Speaker 1>if you use photoshop today, it's the same idea as

0:43:36.200 --> 0:43:39.280
<v Speaker 1>content to wear or the clones stamp, just to take

0:43:39.680 --> 0:43:42.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, to put texture back into the photograph where

0:43:42.440 --> 0:43:44.800
<v Speaker 1>something used to be right. And if you were really

0:43:44.800 --> 0:43:47.440
<v Speaker 1>good at it, it might be difficult, especially on a

0:43:47.520 --> 0:43:51.359
<v Speaker 1>casual glance, to notice that anything hinky has happened. There's

0:43:51.400 --> 0:43:54.479
<v Speaker 1>some examples where you can look at and think, huh,

0:43:54.480 --> 0:43:56.520
<v Speaker 1>if I did not know that there once was someone

0:43:56.600 --> 0:43:59.040
<v Speaker 1>standing there, I never would have picked up on the

0:43:59.080 --> 0:44:00.920
<v Speaker 1>fact that this photo has been altered. There are others

0:44:00.960 --> 0:44:04.000
<v Speaker 1>where there might be some clues, particularly with things that

0:44:04.040 --> 0:44:07.200
<v Speaker 1>have fine detail. Sometimes that will be a giveaway. There's

0:44:07.239 --> 0:44:12.600
<v Speaker 1>one with Hitler that's pretty noticeable. With well technically without Gebals.

0:44:13.680 --> 0:44:16.480
<v Speaker 1>It was originally Girbels was in the photograph. And I

0:44:16.520 --> 0:44:20.080
<v Speaker 1>love that every instance that talks about this says, we

0:44:20.120 --> 0:44:22.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know why. Yeah, we don't know why Hitler got

0:44:22.200 --> 0:44:24.440
<v Speaker 1>mad at Gebels or what the reasoning was, or why

0:44:24.480 --> 0:44:27.120
<v Speaker 1>he decided to erase him from this photo. He just did.

0:44:27.320 --> 0:44:31.800
<v Speaker 1>And it's not done particularly well because here's a blob. Yeah.

0:44:31.920 --> 0:44:35.360
<v Speaker 1>The Stalin one is a little more convincing, mostly because

0:44:35.400 --> 0:44:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the water in the background is a very light, like

0:44:37.640 --> 0:44:40.360
<v Speaker 1>the sunlight is hitting it, so it's harder to see

0:44:40.400 --> 0:44:44.520
<v Speaker 1>that there was once a form there um. But some

0:44:44.600 --> 0:44:46.840
<v Speaker 1>of the other ones are a lot more obvious, by

0:44:46.880 --> 0:44:49.000
<v Speaker 1>the way. The Stalin one, when I see the before

0:44:49.000 --> 0:44:52.120
<v Speaker 1>and after pictures, to me, it just feels like one

0:44:52.160 --> 0:44:54.439
<v Speaker 1>moment Stalin's there next to him, and the next moment,

0:44:54.480 --> 0:44:59.680
<v Speaker 1>Stalin just pushes him off into the river, which somewhere. Yeah,

0:44:59.719 --> 0:45:01.799
<v Speaker 1>it's not that far off from the truth because he

0:45:01.800 --> 0:45:04.920
<v Speaker 1>did have him executed, so uh. And I don't mean

0:45:04.960 --> 0:45:07.160
<v Speaker 1>to laugh about that. I don't think it's funny, but

0:45:07.239 --> 0:45:09.239
<v Speaker 1>I but it is one of those images where you

0:45:09.280 --> 0:45:12.320
<v Speaker 1>just look at and you you know, it lends itself

0:45:12.400 --> 0:45:15.880
<v Speaker 1>to that kind of thought. Uh and Hitler and Stalin

0:45:15.960 --> 0:45:17.800
<v Speaker 1>were not the only ones to do this. Mounts a

0:45:17.960 --> 0:45:21.200
<v Speaker 1>tongue did it. He had a famous photo where there

0:45:21.280 --> 0:45:25.080
<v Speaker 1>was a supporter named Poku who was posed among I

0:45:25.080 --> 0:45:27.600
<v Speaker 1>think they were like originally there were four people in

0:45:27.640 --> 0:45:31.680
<v Speaker 1>the photograph and then three Poku was removed. Uh, Poku

0:45:31.760 --> 0:45:33.960
<v Speaker 1>fell out of favor, and you can tell that this

0:45:34.000 --> 0:45:38.360
<v Speaker 1>one was manipulated to there's Uh, there's a background behind

0:45:38.400 --> 0:45:42.800
<v Speaker 1>where Poku was standing that has mysteriously gotten really blobby

0:45:42.880 --> 0:45:45.640
<v Speaker 1>and dark, and it's not the same color as the

0:45:45.719 --> 0:45:50.080
<v Speaker 1>surrounding wood in the structure that's there. So if you

0:45:50.120 --> 0:45:51.919
<v Speaker 1>look at the first photo where you can see where

0:45:51.920 --> 0:45:54.040
<v Speaker 1>the wood is a certain standard color all the way

0:45:54.040 --> 0:45:56.080
<v Speaker 1>through up to the point where you can't see it

0:45:56.080 --> 0:45:57.879
<v Speaker 1>anymore because pocus in the way and the other one

0:45:57.920 --> 0:46:00.919
<v Speaker 1>looks all blobby, You're like, something's wrong. It's also weird

0:46:01.000 --> 0:46:04.720
<v Speaker 1>when it's you. You see like a lineup of people

0:46:04.800 --> 0:46:09.759
<v Speaker 1>and then you wonder, like why are they standing like that? Yeah?

0:46:09.840 --> 0:46:12.279
<v Speaker 1>Can I talk about my favorite? Sure, it's the one

0:46:12.320 --> 0:46:14.360
<v Speaker 1>of Mussolini. Have you seen this one where he's on

0:46:14.440 --> 0:46:16.600
<v Speaker 1>a horse and he's holding a sword up to the

0:46:16.680 --> 0:46:21.399
<v Speaker 1>sky and uh. In the original there's a horse handler, yes,

0:46:21.600 --> 0:46:23.799
<v Speaker 1>standing right at the very mouth of the horse hold

0:46:23.840 --> 0:46:26.840
<v Speaker 1>in the horse's head, steady, and he had and removed

0:46:26.880 --> 0:46:29.239
<v Speaker 1>and it's a good it's a good it's a good job.

0:46:29.800 --> 0:46:32.000
<v Speaker 1>It looks it looks legitimate. But not like the artist

0:46:32.080 --> 0:46:36.800
<v Speaker 1>gave the horse buck teeth or something. But just that idea, um,

0:46:37.040 --> 0:46:40.880
<v Speaker 1>I think is the perfect amount of posturing for someone

0:46:40.960 --> 0:46:43.319
<v Speaker 1>like that, they would definitely do something like and and

0:46:43.400 --> 0:46:45.640
<v Speaker 1>that's exactly what I was saying before, with the idea

0:46:45.680 --> 0:46:47.960
<v Speaker 1>that you know, to try and make certain figures seem

0:46:48.040 --> 0:46:53.279
<v Speaker 1>more majestic. Uh. You know, if if you're if your

0:46:53.600 --> 0:46:57.200
<v Speaker 1>identity that you are presenting to the public relies on

0:46:57.239 --> 0:47:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you are this powerful figure, you don't

0:47:00.640 --> 0:47:03.760
<v Speaker 1>want it seeing that you need someone there to control

0:47:03.840 --> 0:47:06.200
<v Speaker 1>the horse that you're sitting on. You wanted to look

0:47:06.200 --> 0:47:10.360
<v Speaker 1>like you have that, you know, that amazing ability yourself,

0:47:11.160 --> 0:47:14.399
<v Speaker 1>so you don't want there to seem to be any

0:47:14.440 --> 0:47:18.120
<v Speaker 1>sign of weakness perceived in any way. And that was

0:47:18.320 --> 0:47:21.600
<v Speaker 1>another great example of that. Um. Did you did you

0:47:21.640 --> 0:47:25.480
<v Speaker 1>know about the one from from a group of Russians

0:47:25.480 --> 0:47:29.240
<v Speaker 1>who are erecting the Soviet flag above the Reichstag. Yes,

0:47:29.600 --> 0:47:33.040
<v Speaker 1>and that in the original image, Uh, one of them

0:47:33.080 --> 0:47:35.799
<v Speaker 1>has on two watches. Yeah, he has a band on

0:47:35.920 --> 0:47:39.000
<v Speaker 1>his right arm that some people think was a watch,

0:47:39.040 --> 0:47:42.960
<v Speaker 1>but it probably was actually a compass, so it probably

0:47:43.080 --> 0:47:46.760
<v Speaker 1>was legitimately there. But the reason why the image is altered.

0:47:46.800 --> 0:47:49.600
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the altered image, the band has

0:47:49.640 --> 0:47:53.960
<v Speaker 1>gone off the right arm. And the reasoning was that

0:47:54.480 --> 0:47:56.600
<v Speaker 1>if people saw that he had a band on his

0:47:56.719 --> 0:47:59.200
<v Speaker 1>right arm, they would think he must already be wearing

0:47:59.200 --> 0:48:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a watch on his left arm. That's where people wear

0:48:01.040 --> 0:48:04.160
<v Speaker 1>their watches. So he must have been looting the bodies

0:48:04.200 --> 0:48:07.239
<v Speaker 1>of the dead and put on another watch on his

0:48:07.280 --> 0:48:09.919
<v Speaker 1>other arm, and they didn't want that to be part

0:48:09.920 --> 0:48:13.480
<v Speaker 1>of the image. Truth is, he probably didn't loud the dead.

0:48:13.520 --> 0:48:16.319
<v Speaker 1>He probably was wearing a compass on that arm and

0:48:16.360 --> 0:48:21.320
<v Speaker 1>a watch on his other arm. That idea to come to. Yeah,

0:48:21.560 --> 0:48:25.280
<v Speaker 1>it's and and it's interesting because to me, it's interesting

0:48:25.280 --> 0:48:30.160
<v Speaker 1>in that they were just trying to bypass a misinterpretation

0:48:30.160 --> 0:48:32.520
<v Speaker 1>of the photo and that in fact the photo was

0:48:32.640 --> 0:48:37.200
<v Speaker 1>probably already not indicating that this guy was a looter.

0:48:37.760 --> 0:48:41.320
<v Speaker 1>It was just well, to be safe, we should probably

0:48:41.320 --> 0:48:44.200
<v Speaker 1>take that out and it's also a very small part

0:48:44.320 --> 0:48:47.120
<v Speaker 1>of the photograph. Yeah, I mean it's this is not

0:48:47.239 --> 0:48:49.640
<v Speaker 1>like a close up on the man's wrist, in fact

0:48:49.719 --> 0:48:53.040
<v Speaker 1>that you have to look really closely to notice it.

0:48:53.520 --> 0:48:56.239
<v Speaker 1>But they were concerned and so they did. And then

0:48:56.239 --> 0:48:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the next one I have is actually you you mentioned him, uh,

0:48:59.640 --> 0:49:04.320
<v Speaker 1>Jerry Ulsman in nineteen sixty nine, one of the most

0:49:04.800 --> 0:49:09.800
<v Speaker 1>most striking photos I've seen that again was presented without

0:49:10.040 --> 0:49:12.719
<v Speaker 1>it being you know, it's not meant to deceive or misrepresent.

0:49:12.960 --> 0:49:18.400
<v Speaker 1>It's an artistic expression and it is this amazing photo

0:49:19.040 --> 0:49:22.480
<v Speaker 1>of trees that are suspended in the air, complete with

0:49:22.600 --> 0:49:27.200
<v Speaker 1>roots systems, and it's gorgeous. And if if you haven't

0:49:27.200 --> 0:49:29.640
<v Speaker 1>seen his work, I would suggest looking at it because

0:49:29.680 --> 0:49:35.160
<v Speaker 1>his surreal and impeccably done. Yeah, it is amazing to

0:49:35.200 --> 0:49:38.280
<v Speaker 1>look at. I I was and I'm not generally speaking

0:49:38.280 --> 0:49:41.040
<v Speaker 1>of visual arts kind of guy um one of my

0:49:41.040 --> 0:49:43.600
<v Speaker 1>other flaws, but when I saw this, I just couldn't

0:49:43.600 --> 0:49:46.680
<v Speaker 1>help but really appreciate the mastery of the art that

0:49:46.680 --> 0:49:49.200
<v Speaker 1>it would take to produce such an image. It's interesting

0:49:49.239 --> 0:49:52.440
<v Speaker 1>because his wife is as good at photoshop as he

0:49:52.600 --> 0:49:55.480
<v Speaker 1>is in the dark room. Interesting. Yeah, we'll have to

0:49:55.480 --> 0:49:59.759
<v Speaker 1>talk more about that in part two. Um, So there's

0:49:59.800 --> 0:50:02.719
<v Speaker 1>some other examples we can give, Like there's there's the

0:50:02.719 --> 0:50:08.440
<v Speaker 1>famous National Geographic UH cover in N two push the

0:50:08.480 --> 0:50:12.600
<v Speaker 1>pyramids closer together for a better composition of yeah. Yeah.

0:50:12.640 --> 0:50:14.880
<v Speaker 1>The the original photo was done in sort of a

0:50:14.960 --> 0:50:17.000
<v Speaker 1>landscape mode, and of course, in order to put it

0:50:17.040 --> 0:50:18.799
<v Speaker 1>onto a cover of a magazine, they needed to be

0:50:18.840 --> 0:50:21.520
<v Speaker 1>more portraits, so they squished them together. So if you

0:50:21.600 --> 0:50:26.360
<v Speaker 1>look the pyramids are they appear to be geographically closer

0:50:26.360 --> 0:50:28.440
<v Speaker 1>to one another than they are in reality. And some

0:50:28.480 --> 0:50:33.239
<v Speaker 1>people began to criticize the magazine for saying, you're you're

0:50:33.239 --> 0:50:36.279
<v Speaker 1>misrepresenting reality. You're putting this forward as if this is

0:50:36.320 --> 0:50:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the way it looks, and this is not how it looks.

0:50:38.960 --> 0:50:41.799
<v Speaker 1>And in fact, um they got a new director of

0:50:41.800 --> 0:50:46.320
<v Speaker 1>photography who said that, um, everyone in that GEO thought

0:50:46.400 --> 0:50:49.560
<v Speaker 1>that this was the wrong decision after it went up.

0:50:49.560 --> 0:50:52.359
<v Speaker 1>This was a mistake, not a mistake in the sense

0:50:52.400 --> 0:50:55.440
<v Speaker 1>of oops, we did this, but more like that's something

0:50:55.440 --> 0:50:58.960
<v Speaker 1>that we should not do because it doesn't reflect the

0:50:59.400 --> 0:51:03.560
<v Speaker 1>mission of our magazine. And so they had essentially made

0:51:03.560 --> 0:51:05.840
<v Speaker 1>a statement saying we're not going to do that. Ever. Again,

0:51:06.320 --> 0:51:12.239
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the last pre digital cases I can

0:51:12.320 --> 0:51:14.040
<v Speaker 1>I can think of. Yeah, the most the ones I

0:51:14.080 --> 0:51:17.839
<v Speaker 1>think of certainly happened after the digital era begins, like

0:51:18.080 --> 0:51:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the really famous ones. Obviously there are countless examples that

0:51:21.640 --> 0:51:24.239
<v Speaker 1>are out there, but that's the last one I have

0:51:24.440 --> 0:51:28.200
<v Speaker 1>of the really uh, the notable ones in the pre

0:51:28.280 --> 0:51:30.760
<v Speaker 1>digital era. And now there were some others that happened

0:51:30.760 --> 0:51:33.279
<v Speaker 1>in the post digital era that probably still use some

0:51:33.320 --> 0:51:36.719
<v Speaker 1>old school approach, like I'm thinking specifically of a TV

0:51:36.840 --> 0:51:40.960
<v Speaker 1>guide car that will talk about in part two. But

0:51:41.080 --> 0:51:43.120
<v Speaker 1>let me ask you this, Dylan. Have you have you,

0:51:43.360 --> 0:51:48.400
<v Speaker 1>as a photographer dabbled in some of these techniques for

0:51:48.560 --> 0:51:53.880
<v Speaker 1>whatever purpose almost every day? Yeah? Yeah, since I don't

0:51:53.920 --> 0:51:58.440
<v Speaker 1>do photojournalism, Um, I'm not trying to do anything that

0:51:58.480 --> 0:52:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I don't believe is ethical, right, Um, but let's say that,

0:52:02.760 --> 0:52:06.560
<v Speaker 1>for example, here at how stuff works, I've taken photographs

0:52:06.560 --> 0:52:09.080
<v Speaker 1>of the staff, and everyone's a while to take. We

0:52:09.160 --> 0:52:13.000
<v Speaker 1>have these great big windows that overlook uh the street,

0:52:13.239 --> 0:52:15.440
<v Speaker 1>and um, it's nice to post people and from them

0:52:15.440 --> 0:52:17.520
<v Speaker 1>because there's a great light in that area. And so

0:52:17.560 --> 0:52:20.600
<v Speaker 1>I'll take a portrait of one of our hosts in

0:52:20.680 --> 0:52:24.000
<v Speaker 1>front of that window and then i'll upload it onto

0:52:24.040 --> 0:52:26.480
<v Speaker 1>the computer. I'll realize, oh, there's some cars on the

0:52:26.560 --> 0:52:28.760
<v Speaker 1>road right there. I don't want those cars right there,

0:52:28.880 --> 0:52:32.479
<v Speaker 1>so you remove I remove the cars. Or I took

0:52:32.520 --> 0:52:35.320
<v Speaker 1>a photograph of a couple of our hosts in front

0:52:35.400 --> 0:52:39.040
<v Speaker 1>of the apartment building across the street, and I thought, well,

0:52:39.320 --> 0:52:41.560
<v Speaker 1>the name of the apartment building isn't part of our brand,

0:52:41.800 --> 0:52:44.239
<v Speaker 1>so I should just take it out. Things like that,

0:52:44.360 --> 0:52:48.520
<v Speaker 1>it's just cleaning it up. It's um and things like

0:52:48.600 --> 0:52:51.200
<v Speaker 1>that I know happen every day. I think that. And

0:52:51.440 --> 0:52:55.520
<v Speaker 1>now photo manipulation is probably a little bit like auto tune,

0:52:55.880 --> 0:52:59.960
<v Speaker 1>where you might not know it, but almost every major

0:53:00.239 --> 0:53:02.160
<v Speaker 1>release you here has at least a little bit of

0:53:02.160 --> 0:53:04.960
<v Speaker 1>auto tune. Yeah, because the original purpose of auto tune

0:53:05.040 --> 0:53:09.520
<v Speaker 1>was to be unnoticed. It wasn't meant to be a

0:53:09.520 --> 0:53:13.040
<v Speaker 1>a new form of performance. That's how it got that's

0:53:13.040 --> 0:53:15.719
<v Speaker 1>what it got turned into. And then you had people

0:53:15.760 --> 0:53:19.520
<v Speaker 1>who were behind auto tune saying, well, crap. The whole

0:53:19.520 --> 0:53:22.800
<v Speaker 1>purpose of this was to make make to correct little

0:53:22.960 --> 0:53:26.080
<v Speaker 1>errors and get people closer to being on key and

0:53:26.160 --> 0:53:29.759
<v Speaker 1>on tune without it becoming a noticeable thing. And now

0:53:29.840 --> 0:53:33.200
<v Speaker 1>you guys are are are pushing this into something else,

0:53:33.320 --> 0:53:35.680
<v Speaker 1>not that that isn't legitimate. I mean, I think it's

0:53:35.680 --> 0:53:41.200
<v Speaker 1>always important to recognize the art sometimes takes established processes

0:53:41.280 --> 0:53:43.640
<v Speaker 1>or technologies and pushes them in new ways, and that's

0:53:43.640 --> 0:53:46.720
<v Speaker 1>how you get new stuff. Yeah, you get the share

0:53:46.719 --> 0:53:49.920
<v Speaker 1>effect an auto tune, or you have Andy Warhol making

0:53:50.200 --> 0:53:53.520
<v Speaker 1>prints until they deteriorate over and over again on like

0:53:53.560 --> 0:53:56.799
<v Speaker 1>a like a screen print, over and over again. But

0:53:57.160 --> 0:54:01.600
<v Speaker 1>just like how auto tune tries to find the right

0:54:01.640 --> 0:54:04.279
<v Speaker 1>note between two two different notes, tries to get you

0:54:04.320 --> 0:54:06.759
<v Speaker 1>to that right note. Uh, I think a lot of

0:54:06.800 --> 0:54:10.920
<v Speaker 1>people put their their photographs into a light room or

0:54:11.040 --> 0:54:13.080
<v Speaker 1>photoshop and they just try and get it to the

0:54:13.160 --> 0:54:19.080
<v Speaker 1>right exposure, the right saturation, uh, color correction, dodging and burning,

0:54:19.080 --> 0:54:21.400
<v Speaker 1>which we can talk about in the second episode. Just

0:54:21.480 --> 0:54:24.200
<v Speaker 1>small things like that that I think people have become

0:54:24.239 --> 0:54:26.440
<v Speaker 1>so accustomed to that if you gave them an image

0:54:26.520 --> 0:54:29.279
<v Speaker 1>right out of the camera, they would feel like it

0:54:29.280 --> 0:54:32.799
<v Speaker 1>could have been improved upon. Yeah, this to me is

0:54:32.840 --> 0:54:37.239
<v Speaker 1>really the fascinating part of this, the idea that as

0:54:37.280 --> 0:54:42.000
<v Speaker 1>someone who's who's a casual shutter bug at best, like

0:54:42.600 --> 0:54:46.880
<v Speaker 1>I am not known for the making great composition of shots,

0:54:47.160 --> 0:54:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I take pictures casually in order to capture moments to remember,

0:54:50.440 --> 0:54:52.239
<v Speaker 1>and that's about it. Like, that's that's about as far

0:54:52.280 --> 0:54:54.399
<v Speaker 1>as my expertise goes in that area. I have a

0:54:54.480 --> 0:54:59.319
<v Speaker 1>deep appreciation for people who have a great understanding of composition,

0:54:59.440 --> 0:55:03.600
<v Speaker 1>of lighting, of what needs to happen on the camera

0:55:03.680 --> 0:55:06.800
<v Speaker 1>side in order to capture the moment that you intend

0:55:06.960 --> 0:55:09.600
<v Speaker 1>to capture, and only that, but what has to happen

0:55:09.680 --> 0:55:12.319
<v Speaker 1>on the back end after the photo has been quote

0:55:12.360 --> 0:55:15.120
<v Speaker 1>unquote taken in order for you to have the finished

0:55:15.120 --> 0:55:19.560
<v Speaker 1>picture represent your vision, especially as an artist. That's that

0:55:19.680 --> 0:55:21.960
<v Speaker 1>to me is amazing, Like a lot I think, I

0:55:22.239 --> 0:55:26.279
<v Speaker 1>think I often would think of photography the way a

0:55:26.320 --> 0:55:30.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of early photographers thought about it, that photography's purpose

0:55:31.080 --> 0:55:35.600
<v Speaker 1>is to capture a moment um as close to representing

0:55:35.600 --> 0:55:38.640
<v Speaker 1>it in as being real as possible, like like capturing

0:55:38.680 --> 0:55:41.680
<v Speaker 1>that real moment forever and fixing it in a medium

0:55:41.719 --> 0:55:44.120
<v Speaker 1>so it can stay that way for the end of time.

0:55:44.719 --> 0:55:49.560
<v Speaker 1>And I don't necessarily, or at least I didn't think

0:55:49.600 --> 0:55:54.680
<v Speaker 1>about the fact that sometimes the point where you push

0:55:54.800 --> 0:55:58.160
<v Speaker 1>the shutter button on your camera is just the beginning,

0:55:58.640 --> 0:56:01.200
<v Speaker 1>and then you have another process us that follows to

0:56:01.360 --> 0:56:05.240
<v Speaker 1>get to the photo that you want that actually represents

0:56:05.280 --> 0:56:08.120
<v Speaker 1>your vision. There are definitely two sides of it. I

0:56:08.160 --> 0:56:14.200
<v Speaker 1>mean to have the idea of, like you said, getting

0:56:14.200 --> 0:56:18.800
<v Speaker 1>a photograph, saving it for history and not touching it,

0:56:18.880 --> 0:56:22.480
<v Speaker 1>I think is also very important depending on the case.

0:56:22.560 --> 0:56:26.239
<v Speaker 1>It's like when you get the audio of the State

0:56:26.280 --> 0:56:28.520
<v Speaker 1>of the Union, or if the President makes an address,

0:56:28.600 --> 0:56:34.400
<v Speaker 1>you don't cut it because that that can change context.

0:56:34.560 --> 0:56:39.080
<v Speaker 1>You shouldn't do the same thing um with photojournalism, or

0:56:39.080 --> 0:56:41.759
<v Speaker 1>at least most people believe that. It's like there was

0:56:41.800 --> 0:56:45.520
<v Speaker 1>a famous example in seventy at the Kent State shootings

0:56:46.239 --> 0:56:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that there's a picture of a body on the ground

0:56:49.480 --> 0:56:52.960
<v Speaker 1>and there's a woman grieving over it, and there was

0:56:53.040 --> 0:56:57.319
<v Speaker 1>a pole sticking out from behind her head. Um, and

0:56:57.840 --> 0:57:02.040
<v Speaker 1>someone saw that photograph and took the pole out. And

0:57:02.239 --> 0:57:05.600
<v Speaker 1>does it change the context of the photograph? Not particularly.

0:57:05.640 --> 0:57:08.040
<v Speaker 1>It was done for compositional reasons, to make it more

0:57:08.160 --> 0:57:11.000
<v Speaker 1>aesthetically pleasing. One of the things that I learned when

0:57:11.000 --> 0:57:14.360
<v Speaker 1>I went to college photophotography is never have a pole

0:57:14.440 --> 0:57:17.560
<v Speaker 1>behind someone's head. It's just it's just you don't do it.

0:57:17.560 --> 0:57:22.960
<v Speaker 1>It's distracting. And yes, but if it starts there with photojournalism,

0:57:23.000 --> 0:57:26.320
<v Speaker 1>if you start by removing a pole, it could only

0:57:26.480 --> 0:57:29.800
<v Speaker 1>escalate from there um and you know, you get to

0:57:29.800 --> 0:57:31.000
<v Speaker 1>a point where you're like, all right, it was a

0:57:31.000 --> 0:57:33.200
<v Speaker 1>pole in this case. All right, it was someone's ring

0:57:33.280 --> 0:57:36.680
<v Speaker 1>in this case, which changes the context depending upon the culture,

0:57:37.400 --> 0:57:40.760
<v Speaker 1>or it was you know, removing an entire person and

0:57:40.800 --> 0:57:44.560
<v Speaker 1>erasing that person's presence from an actual historical moment. I mean,

0:57:44.880 --> 0:57:47.960
<v Speaker 1>it does become a slope, right, And if when people

0:57:48.000 --> 0:57:51.520
<v Speaker 1>find out, it raises more questions than it ever really answers, sure,

0:57:51.720 --> 0:57:55.680
<v Speaker 1>because then you start questioning the motivations behind the action,

0:57:55.960 --> 0:57:58.560
<v Speaker 1>and then you think, well, what are your ulterior motives

0:57:58.720 --> 0:58:03.600
<v Speaker 1>for making these alterations to this photograph? And uh, you know,

0:58:03.640 --> 0:58:05.920
<v Speaker 1>we've explored some of that here. In some cases it

0:58:05.960 --> 0:58:09.200
<v Speaker 1>was meant to mislead people specifically, in some cases it

0:58:09.240 --> 0:58:14.200
<v Speaker 1>was a matter of ego, uh, and sometimes ego to

0:58:14.280 --> 0:58:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the point of of megalomaniac maniake the egos I mean

0:58:19.400 --> 0:58:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Stalin and and Mault s Tong and the biggest egos

0:58:22.520 --> 0:58:26.160
<v Speaker 1>of the twentieth century learned mostly and yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:58:26.240 --> 0:58:29.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean those are big egos and to the point

0:58:29.160 --> 0:58:33.120
<v Speaker 1>where if you want someone gone you don't just kill them,

0:58:33.120 --> 0:58:38.680
<v Speaker 1>but you erase all record of them. That's insane really

0:58:38.760 --> 0:58:41.200
<v Speaker 1>to me. But as far as people who would have

0:58:42.560 --> 0:58:46.479
<v Speaker 1>like who would have a history of having photos manipulated, yeah,

0:58:46.800 --> 0:58:51.800
<v Speaker 1>it makes total sense that those would be the personalities

0:58:51.840 --> 0:58:54.840
<v Speaker 1>that demand these things. And we've also, of course, there

0:58:54.840 --> 0:58:58.920
<v Speaker 1>are plenty of examples of other artists and photographers who

0:58:58.920 --> 0:59:03.480
<v Speaker 1>have manipulated him, just using pictures of people like those, uh,

0:59:03.520 --> 0:59:09.200
<v Speaker 1>in order to lampoon or youth satire or some other

0:59:09.320 --> 0:59:12.760
<v Speaker 1>means to make a message. Like there's a famous one, uh,

0:59:12.800 --> 0:59:16.920
<v Speaker 1>not a particularly convincing, uh, cut and paste job, but

0:59:17.040 --> 0:59:20.600
<v Speaker 1>there was one where it's a picture of of of

0:59:20.640 --> 0:59:23.720
<v Speaker 1>someone dressed up with an apron and they're holding a

0:59:23.800 --> 0:59:26.800
<v Speaker 1>cleaver and they're about to chop the head off of

0:59:27.400 --> 0:59:31.120
<v Speaker 1>a of a bird, a bird that represents France, and

0:59:31.160 --> 0:59:34.080
<v Speaker 1>they've cut and paste Hitler's head on top of the

0:59:34.200 --> 0:59:40.240
<v Speaker 1>person's head, thus representing Hitler's approach to attacking and and

0:59:40.400 --> 0:59:43.760
<v Speaker 1>conquering France. And it was meant as a political statement,

0:59:44.000 --> 0:59:46.800
<v Speaker 1>and it wasn't meant to mislead obviously, it wasn't. It wasn't.

0:59:46.840 --> 0:59:50.200
<v Speaker 1>The intent wasn't to suggest, like, look at this weird picture.

0:59:50.200 --> 0:59:54.000
<v Speaker 1>I got a hitler. It was obviously to make a statement. Yes, yeah,

0:59:54.240 --> 0:59:57.400
<v Speaker 1>so lots of different reasons for this. Now this is

0:59:57.440 --> 1:00:00.360
<v Speaker 1>really neat because it does show the amount of work

1:00:01.000 --> 1:00:05.760
<v Speaker 1>necessary to edit and manipulate photos. Sometimes it meant taking

1:00:05.760 --> 1:00:08.480
<v Speaker 1>a risk that you might ruin the negative that you

1:00:08.520 --> 1:00:11.680
<v Speaker 1>had created. Not all of these manipulations when you had

1:00:11.680 --> 1:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to go back to the negative and make some changes, No,

1:00:14.520 --> 1:00:16.520
<v Speaker 1>all of them turned out great, And there is no

1:00:16.600 --> 1:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>undo button. Yeah, so we have no way of knowing

1:00:19.760 --> 1:00:24.760
<v Speaker 1>how many potentially historical images we've lost as a result

1:00:24.880 --> 1:00:29.080
<v Speaker 1>of an error made in the manipulation process. I hope

1:00:29.080 --> 1:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>you enjoyed that classic episode of tech stuff. We'll be

1:00:31.400 --> 1:00:34.600
<v Speaker 1>back next week with part two. This is another one

1:00:34.600 --> 1:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>of those topics that I could easily do an update

1:00:36.680 --> 1:00:39.280
<v Speaker 1>too and talk about some of the new tools for

1:00:39.520 --> 1:00:43.600
<v Speaker 1>editing photos and videos and more, and how machine learning

1:00:43.600 --> 1:00:48.439
<v Speaker 1>and artificial intelligence have greatly enhanced our ability to manipulate

1:00:49.120 --> 1:00:52.480
<v Speaker 1>photos to the point where it's hard to trust anything

1:00:52.520 --> 1:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>you see these days in many ways. But we'll be

1:00:55.800 --> 1:00:59.200
<v Speaker 1>back next week to conclude this two parter, and in

1:00:59.240 --> 1:01:01.400
<v Speaker 1>the meantime, if you have suggestions for topics, I should

1:01:01.440 --> 1:01:03.360
<v Speaker 1>cover on tech Stuff. Feel free to reach out to me.

1:01:03.400 --> 1:01:05.040
<v Speaker 1>One way to do that is to download the i

1:01:05.120 --> 1:01:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio app. It's free to use. Just navigate over

1:01:08.200 --> 1:01:11.160
<v Speaker 1>to the tech Stuff page on I Heart Radios podcast

1:01:11.240 --> 1:01:13.760
<v Speaker 1>app and you can leave a message by clicking on

1:01:13.760 --> 1:01:16.080
<v Speaker 1>a little microphone icon that lets you leave up to

1:01:16.120 --> 1:01:19.640
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds of audio. Please be kind and uh. You

1:01:19.680 --> 1:01:21.120
<v Speaker 1>can let me know what you would like me to

1:01:21.120 --> 1:01:24.240
<v Speaker 1>talk about on the show, or if you prefer, you

1:01:24.240 --> 1:01:26.240
<v Speaker 1>can reach out to me on Twitter. The handle for

1:01:26.280 --> 1:01:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the show is tech Stuff H s W and I'll

1:01:29.480 --> 1:01:38.320
<v Speaker 1>talk to you again really soon. Yeah. Tech Stuff is

1:01:38.320 --> 1:01:41.480
<v Speaker 1>an i Heart Radio production. For more podcasts from my

1:01:41.600 --> 1:01:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio, visit the i Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts,

1:01:45.320 --> 1:01:47.320
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.