WEBVTT - Virgin Galactic Reaches New Heights 

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:04.040
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:06.920
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller. Every business day, we bring

0:00:06.960 --> 0:00:11.520
<v Speaker 1>you interviews from CEOs, market pros, and Bloomberg experts, along

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:15.600
<v Speaker 1>with essential market moving news. Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast

0:00:15.600 --> 0:00:18.479
<v Speaker 1>on Apple Podcasts or wherever you listen to podcasts, and

0:00:18.480 --> 0:00:22.279
<v Speaker 1>at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast. Taylor, when I was

0:00:22.320 --> 0:00:25.120
<v Speaker 1>a kid, it was about space was big. We had

0:00:25.200 --> 0:00:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the Apollo program. Um, you know, we'd watch it from

0:00:28.880 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 1>school in our classrooms. Launches and splashdowns in the middle

0:00:31.720 --> 0:00:33.200
<v Speaker 1>of the ocean. We have people walking on the moon.

0:00:33.240 --> 0:00:37.080
<v Speaker 1>It was really really cool time. Space is making a

0:00:37.120 --> 0:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>big comeback. You know, it's been kind of quiet since

0:00:39.680 --> 0:00:41.840
<v Speaker 1>the Space Shuttle era, but it's making a big comeback.

0:00:41.840 --> 0:00:45.000
<v Speaker 1>And now we've got billionaires going up seemingly weekly here

0:00:45.040 --> 0:00:47.080
<v Speaker 1>into space or Richard Branson over the weekend. I think

0:00:47.120 --> 0:00:49.920
<v Speaker 1>we've got Jeff Bezos and a matter of days and

0:00:49.920 --> 0:00:53.000
<v Speaker 1>then Elon Musk is out there somewhere. I'm sure, um,

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 1>let's get an over you what's going on in the

0:00:55.400 --> 0:00:58.640
<v Speaker 1>world of space. Laura for Sick Space analysts and owner

0:00:58.680 --> 0:01:02.720
<v Speaker 1>of Astroltical, author of rise of the space age millennial.

0:01:02.800 --> 0:01:08.000
<v Speaker 1>She's also NASA subject matter expert for Planetary Science Missions. Laura,

0:01:08.080 --> 0:01:10.920
<v Speaker 1>this is really a cool time for space travel and

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:15.479
<v Speaker 1>people that are really into space travel. UM, give us

0:01:15.760 --> 0:01:19.960
<v Speaker 1>your sense, your takeaway on the importance of Sir Richard

0:01:19.959 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 1>Branson's flight yesterday and the upcoming Jeff Bezos flight. What

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:25.759
<v Speaker 1>does it tell you about the future of space travel.

0:01:26.600 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>This is really a great time because this is the

0:01:28.480 --> 0:01:32.560
<v Speaker 1>emergence of true commercial private space flight. Where back in

0:01:32.600 --> 0:01:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the two thousands we saw commercial space flight beginning with

0:01:35.520 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>tourists going to the International Space Station, but through Russian

0:01:38.560 --> 0:01:42.000
<v Speaker 1>rockets and Russian training, and now we're seeing purely commercial

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:46.720
<v Speaker 1>efforts where um, just now yesterday we saw Richard Branson

0:01:46.720 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 1>and a crew flying on his own rocket through Virgin

0:01:49.920 --> 0:01:51.960
<v Speaker 1>Chalactic and then, as you said, in about eight days,

0:01:51.960 --> 0:01:54.960
<v Speaker 1>we're going to see Jeff Bezos and his crew fly

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 1>on a Blue Origin rocket. And then later this year

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:02.200
<v Speaker 1>in September, we're gonna see a crew go to um

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:05.040
<v Speaker 1>orbital space and just orbit Earth for a few days

0:02:05.040 --> 0:02:08.240
<v Speaker 1>through the inspiration formission with Space Sex. So lots of

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:12.359
<v Speaker 1>really great private spacelight going on, Laura, is it okay

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:15.399
<v Speaker 1>to ask sort of how you're thinking about the difference

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:20.240
<v Speaker 1>between the Virgin Galactic versus the Blue Origin. There's differences,

0:02:20.280 --> 0:02:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I believe in one has a few pilots. One I

0:02:23.720 --> 0:02:26.400
<v Speaker 1>think is more automated. Is there a difference in the

0:02:26.400 --> 0:02:32.000
<v Speaker 1>way you're thinking about profitability for these companies or just frankly,

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 1>the technicals of of going up there on on two

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 1>or three different different ships that are operated differently. You're

0:02:39.880 --> 0:02:42.240
<v Speaker 1>exactly right, there's a there's a big difference between the two.

0:02:42.320 --> 0:02:44.720
<v Speaker 1>So one yesterday we saw was a carrier plane that

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:47.320
<v Speaker 1>released a space plane that launched with two pilots and

0:02:47.400 --> 0:02:50.359
<v Speaker 1>four passengers. And the one that we're going to see

0:02:50.360 --> 0:02:52.799
<v Speaker 1>in eight days Blue Origin is the traditional rocket with

0:02:52.880 --> 0:02:55.200
<v Speaker 1>a capital on top and a capsule separates and lands

0:02:55.240 --> 0:02:58.120
<v Speaker 1>with parachutes. So that is a difference in approach, and

0:02:58.160 --> 0:02:59.919
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have to see how the market plays

0:03:00.000 --> 0:03:02.959
<v Speaker 1>out on whether customers prefer one method or the other,

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:05.440
<v Speaker 1>or whether safety plays out one method or the other.

0:03:05.680 --> 0:03:07.400
<v Speaker 1>But I think it's too early to say that one

0:03:07.440 --> 0:03:09.239
<v Speaker 1>is better than the other. I think we're just gonna

0:03:09.280 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 1>have to see, and I will go on both of them.

0:03:11.600 --> 0:03:13.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm sure you and I would too. I'm not sure

0:03:13.919 --> 0:03:15.959
<v Speaker 1>two or fifty thousand dollars a seat though, but for

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot of folks probably worth it. So, Laura, what's

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:21.920
<v Speaker 1>the what are like next steps do you think for

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:26.359
<v Speaker 1>the commercialization if you will, of space and space travel?

0:03:26.400 --> 0:03:28.640
<v Speaker 1>What are there? I mean, these things are great, Uh,

0:03:28.720 --> 0:03:31.880
<v Speaker 1>it's really interesting, but what are the next steps? We're

0:03:31.880 --> 0:03:35.600
<v Speaker 1>seeing these two sub orbital carriers come online with paying

0:03:35.640 --> 0:03:39.160
<v Speaker 1>passengers and also science. There's science has being done. There

0:03:39.160 --> 0:03:41.640
<v Speaker 1>was a science experiment on the one yesterday, So there's

0:03:41.640 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>some really great opportunities there for not just rich tourists,

0:03:45.000 --> 0:03:49.240
<v Speaker 1>but also for research institutions, NASA and other governments that

0:03:49.320 --> 0:03:51.320
<v Speaker 1>might be able to fly their science or do training

0:03:51.360 --> 0:03:54.040
<v Speaker 1>for astronauts. There's also think I said, space X, who

0:03:54.120 --> 0:03:56.720
<v Speaker 1>is going to be flying not just um, not just

0:03:56.800 --> 0:03:59.480
<v Speaker 1>paying people to the International Space Station as they've been

0:03:59.480 --> 0:04:02.720
<v Speaker 1>doing with the astronauts since last year, but also just

0:04:02.800 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 1>in orbit around the Earth and a free flyer just

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:07.920
<v Speaker 1>doing a crew dragon fleece free flyer not even attached

0:04:07.960 --> 0:04:10.520
<v Speaker 1>to the space station. But speaking of space stations, there

0:04:10.560 --> 0:04:13.080
<v Speaker 1>are going to be private space stations coming on board

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>in the next decade, so we should see companies like

0:04:15.400 --> 0:04:18.440
<v Speaker 1>Axiom Space and others starting to put up space stations

0:04:18.480 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 1>that will um work with the International Space Station and

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:25.159
<v Speaker 1>eventually replace the International Space Station. It's just incredible, I

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:27.280
<v Speaker 1>think when you think about how far we've come, Paul

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:31.200
<v Speaker 1>in the last even just decade in terms of commercial

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:34.800
<v Speaker 1>space flight, and and Laura, I mean it's interesting hearing

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:39.479
<v Speaker 1>some funny conversations earlier this morning that eventually we'll run

0:04:39.520 --> 0:04:42.800
<v Speaker 1>out of billionaires who can afford this, and it'll want

0:04:42.839 --> 0:04:46.080
<v Speaker 1>to be more mass market. How are you thinking about

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:50.160
<v Speaker 1>pricing and making it more affordable? What does that look

0:04:50.160 --> 0:04:53.159
<v Speaker 1>like to you? Right so, right now, a trip to

0:04:53.160 --> 0:04:56.239
<v Speaker 1>the International Space Station costs roughly fifty million dollars. There's

0:04:56.240 --> 0:04:58.320
<v Speaker 1>not many people who can't afford that, but a trip

0:04:58.360 --> 0:05:01.120
<v Speaker 1>to several will space is were affordable for for a

0:05:01.200 --> 0:05:04.080
<v Speaker 1>larger group of people. Still not me, but as you said,

0:05:04.279 --> 0:05:06.200
<v Speaker 1>roughly a quarter of a million dollars. We don't know

0:05:06.240 --> 0:05:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the price that Blue Origin is going to sell their

0:05:08.040 --> 0:05:10.719
<v Speaker 1>tickets for um, and that might be affordable for people

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:13.680
<v Speaker 1>who save up enough money or for people who are sponsored.

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 1>There's a group called Space for Humanity and other groups

0:05:16.240 --> 0:05:19.159
<v Speaker 1>that are trying to sponsor the quote unquote normal people

0:05:19.279 --> 0:05:22.320
<v Speaker 1>who can fly on suborbital space flight. Um. And then

0:05:22.440 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 1>as this technology become more and more common, just as

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 1>other technologies started out with the wealthy and then we're

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:31.640
<v Speaker 1>brought downs in price to make it more accessible to

0:05:31.640 --> 0:05:34.200
<v Speaker 1>the common person. The theory is that will happen with

0:05:34.240 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 1>spaceflight as well. So Laura just want to get a

0:05:37.800 --> 0:05:39.840
<v Speaker 1>sense here what I grew up again, It was NASA,

0:05:39.880 --> 0:05:42.839
<v Speaker 1>It was the U. S. Government leading the way. My

0:05:42.920 --> 0:05:46.080
<v Speaker 1>question now is where is NASA in the global space

0:05:46.520 --> 0:05:49.960
<v Speaker 1>competitive race visa v. China, Russia. Where we as a

0:05:50.080 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 1>country now as becomes you know, maybe some of the

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:58.080
<v Speaker 1>responsibility shifts from NASA to these commercial entities. NASA is

0:05:58.200 --> 0:06:00.599
<v Speaker 1>very focused on its Artemis program right now, which is

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:03.280
<v Speaker 1>going to send the next the next man, and the

0:06:03.320 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 1>first woman and the first person's color to the Moon.

0:06:06.160 --> 0:06:09.200
<v Speaker 1>It is as soon as four and that's really exciting

0:06:09.240 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 1>because there is a bit of a jew political competition

0:06:12.000 --> 0:06:14.720
<v Speaker 1>there because the Chinese and the Russian partner to do

0:06:15.080 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 1>a winner base as well. It's in a different time frame,

0:06:17.880 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 1>about a decade later than NASA intends to. But NASA's

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:23.159
<v Speaker 1>partnering with countries all around the world something called the

0:06:23.279 --> 0:06:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Artemis Accords where they partnered with twelve countries around the world. Um,

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna be a real international partnership there. It's not

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:31.359
<v Speaker 1>going to be like the Apollo program where it was

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:34.039
<v Speaker 1>mainly you focused on the United States. This is really

0:06:34.080 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 1>going to be an international partnership. We even have a

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:40.240
<v Speaker 1>Canadian astronaut confirmed to fly with American astronaut on the

0:06:40.320 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Artemist mission around the Moon before the first woner landing

0:06:43.720 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 1>in the Artemist three mission. So that's really exciting to

0:06:45.960 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 1>see us finally returned back to the Moon. Laura, I'm

0:06:49.560 --> 0:06:50.960
<v Speaker 1>going to get a lot of hate mail for this,

0:06:51.080 --> 0:06:52.760
<v Speaker 1>but it's my job to ask, so I'm going to

0:06:52.880 --> 0:06:54.640
<v Speaker 1>ask it anyways. I'm going to try to do this

0:06:54.720 --> 0:06:58.599
<v Speaker 1>in the nicest way possible as a space analyst, what

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:03.200
<v Speaker 1>is the risk the headline risk around the carbon footprint.

0:07:03.240 --> 0:07:06.159
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you think about all the focus on going

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:08.760
<v Speaker 1>green and protecting our planet and then you have a

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:11.280
<v Speaker 1>bunch of billionaires who are going into space for fun.

0:07:11.960 --> 0:07:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Is there a risk of any backlash on wondering what

0:07:15.280 --> 0:07:20.120
<v Speaker 1>this is doing to the environment. It's no more harmful

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 1>to the environment than the other types of transportation that

0:07:22.280 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 1>we use is a key that's a key point right there,

0:07:25.480 --> 0:07:28.360
<v Speaker 1>right that we need to be responsible and how we

0:07:28.600 --> 0:07:31.840
<v Speaker 1>develop our technology and improve our technology to be responsible

0:07:31.840 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 1>stewards of Earth. And one thing that I would like

0:07:34.080 --> 0:07:36.600
<v Speaker 1>to personally experience I've only heard from other astronauts is

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 1>something called the open view effect where people who see

0:07:39.280 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>the Earth from above, whether that's in orbit or in

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:46.040
<v Speaker 1>SubOrbit um, they come across a different perspective where they

0:07:46.080 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 1>actually feel more environmentally connected to our planet. So that

0:07:50.240 --> 0:07:52.560
<v Speaker 1>might be a way that changes people's minds and makes

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:55.680
<v Speaker 1>them more environmentally conscious by seeing our Earth as one

0:07:55.760 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>fragile planet. Hey Laura, thanks so much for joining us,

0:07:58.480 --> 0:08:01.400
<v Speaker 1>or really appreciate you coming on and sharing your thoughts.

0:08:01.480 --> 0:08:04.880
<v Speaker 1>Law Force like space annalys and owner of Asterioltical, also

0:08:05.040 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 1>rise of the Space age millennials. This is Bloomberg. You know.

0:08:11.400 --> 0:08:14.040
<v Speaker 1>As I talked to Tom Keane, as I typically do,

0:08:14.160 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 1>it's always a question of when do we get Tom

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:18.800
<v Speaker 1>into this market. He's in that triple leverage all cash

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:22.640
<v Speaker 1>fund and uh, he always feels like he's missed his opportunity.

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:25.520
<v Speaker 1>But here we are at all time highs again for

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the equity Indusseries is it time to raise cash? What

0:08:28.680 --> 0:08:31.040
<v Speaker 1>do we do here? David ko Talk, chairman and chief

0:08:31.040 --> 0:08:34.080
<v Speaker 1>investment officer Kumblin Advisors, joins us. I believe he's in

0:08:34.160 --> 0:08:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Colorado today. Why would you be in Florida when you

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:40.160
<v Speaker 1>can be in Colorado in uh the summer. David, thanks

0:08:40.160 --> 0:08:42.400
<v Speaker 1>so much for joining us here. Again, what do we

0:08:42.440 --> 0:08:47.000
<v Speaker 1>tell our good friend Tom Keane about these equity markets? Well,

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:50.800
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much, fall and I gathered Taylor as

0:08:50.920 --> 0:08:53.440
<v Speaker 1>with you, and it's very nice to chat with old

0:08:53.480 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>friends from Summit County, Colorado, where nine thousand feet nice

0:08:57.559 --> 0:09:01.080
<v Speaker 1>and you just announced Webber Grill and I would say,

0:09:01.160 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 1>if Taylor and you can find your way to Colorado,

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:08.440
<v Speaker 1>I will cook you a steak on the deck on

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:13.719
<v Speaker 1>that Webb grilled sole. As for Tom Kane and what

0:09:13.800 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 1>he should do with cash, I can't say, but I

0:09:16.360 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 1>can tell you we have built a cash reserve here recently.

0:09:20.480 --> 0:09:24.600
<v Speaker 1>We are not fully invested. Um. It's been a marvelous

0:09:24.720 --> 0:09:30.880
<v Speaker 1>first quarter, much beyond anyone's expectations. And my grandfather, bless

0:09:31.000 --> 0:09:35.080
<v Speaker 1>his memory, taught me you never get hurt taking some profits.

0:09:35.120 --> 0:09:38.080
<v Speaker 1>So we took a part of the profits of the

0:09:38.120 --> 0:09:41.160
<v Speaker 1>first quarter where we had achieved in six months what

0:09:41.280 --> 0:09:44.440
<v Speaker 1>we thought we would achieve in the whole year, and

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 1>we banked a little and are waiting for opportunity. The

0:09:48.640 --> 0:09:52.599
<v Speaker 1>rest of the portfolios in the United States et F

0:09:52.840 --> 0:09:57.520
<v Speaker 1>structured portfolio, the U S. E t F portfolio is

0:09:58.080 --> 0:10:03.520
<v Speaker 1>heavily overweight. The health sector almost double market wait market

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:05.920
<v Speaker 1>wait for the if you look at the sectors is

0:10:05.960 --> 0:10:11.640
<v Speaker 1>approximately four or so. We're about twenty eight, very broadly

0:10:11.679 --> 0:10:19.280
<v Speaker 1>diversified within healthcare, devices, parmaceutical, biotech, the gamut structured with

0:10:19.440 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 1>E t F, and we believe the pandemic is not

0:10:23.240 --> 0:10:27.959
<v Speaker 1>over long haul Covid is with us for a while,

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe years, and the healthcare sector has a monumental task

0:10:33.440 --> 0:10:36.920
<v Speaker 1>ahead of it and will step up and deliver results

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:39.200
<v Speaker 1>as best as it care. You know, David, we love

0:10:39.240 --> 0:10:42.960
<v Speaker 1>getting you on this program more than just the opportunity

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:45.960
<v Speaker 1>to have you grill us some stakes. You mentioned you're

0:10:45.960 --> 0:10:50.199
<v Speaker 1>not fully invested, and I am curious, what would it take.

0:10:50.600 --> 0:10:54.400
<v Speaker 1>What is the opportunity? Is it a ten pullback? What

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:58.920
<v Speaker 1>is it that you would be willing to commit more cash? Well,

0:10:59.520 --> 0:11:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I think there's several major issues about which there's uncertainty.

0:11:05.400 --> 0:11:09.360
<v Speaker 1>Uncertainty means you can't put probabilities on that. Taylor. We

0:11:09.440 --> 0:11:14.480
<v Speaker 1>don't know where this China initiative, which is anti US,

0:11:14.640 --> 0:11:19.320
<v Speaker 1>anti capital markets, pulling I p o s, putting on restrictions,

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:23.240
<v Speaker 1>dealing with two hundred and fifty securities of various types

0:11:23.280 --> 0:11:27.040
<v Speaker 1>that trade in the United States, is going to lead us.

0:11:27.120 --> 0:11:30.520
<v Speaker 1>We have a capital market conflict between the United States

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 1>and China, the two largest economies in the world number one.

0:11:34.160 --> 0:11:37.240
<v Speaker 1>We don't know where that goes, but it can't be pretty. Second,

0:11:37.600 --> 0:11:40.480
<v Speaker 1>we don't have herd immunity in the United States, and

0:11:40.559 --> 0:11:47.199
<v Speaker 1>we have twenty five of the population that is rejecting science.

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Now there's a debate about science, no question about it,

0:11:51.720 --> 0:11:55.719
<v Speaker 1>but there's also evidence. And when you look around, you

0:11:55.760 --> 0:12:01.400
<v Speaker 1>see that the vaccination rollout is not work being completely

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:04.040
<v Speaker 1>as expected. You then you look at the rest of

0:12:04.080 --> 0:12:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the world and you say, there's six point eight billion

0:12:07.679 --> 0:12:10.600
<v Speaker 1>people out of seven point eight billions that have not

0:12:10.800 --> 0:12:14.600
<v Speaker 1>had a vaccination at all. They're in places where public

0:12:14.640 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 1>health systems are deficient. So these are massive shocks in

0:12:20.200 --> 0:12:24.720
<v Speaker 1>addition to fires and climate change as a massive shock.

0:12:25.160 --> 0:12:28.680
<v Speaker 1>So what do you do when you have several black

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:34.320
<v Speaker 1>swans flying around in the flock. You pause, you put

0:12:34.360 --> 0:12:37.719
<v Speaker 1>some cash on the side, you wait, you say, I

0:12:37.840 --> 0:12:41.640
<v Speaker 1>don't know, and therefore I've had a great run in

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the stock market recovery. Now I need to pause, and

0:12:45.840 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 1>that's what we're doing when we redeploy and where remains

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 1>to be seen were open, but we're not committing to

0:12:52.760 --> 0:12:56.800
<v Speaker 1>that now. David, about thirty seconds left. What is what

0:12:56.840 --> 0:12:58.560
<v Speaker 1>do you think will be the next movement by this

0:12:58.600 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 1>foot to reserve? Well, I think that FAID doesn't do

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:05.880
<v Speaker 1>anything until they get to the Jackson Whole meeting, and

0:13:05.920 --> 0:13:13.440
<v Speaker 1>then they have to soft gradualistically, very baby steps, try

0:13:13.679 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>to ease back on easing, a very difficult task or

0:13:17.400 --> 0:13:21.880
<v Speaker 1>any central bank, especially ours, under these circumstances. That's how

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:24.520
<v Speaker 1>it looks to Bigful. All right, David, thank you so much.

0:13:24.600 --> 0:13:29.440
<v Speaker 1>We as always appreciate your time. Enjoy the cool weather,

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:32.440
<v Speaker 1>hopefully out in ten thousand feet in Colorado. David Ko talk,

0:13:32.679 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 1>chairman and chief investment officer Cumbling Advisors again. They have

0:13:35.480 --> 0:13:37.920
<v Speaker 1>about three billion dollars in assets under management, and I

0:13:38.000 --> 0:13:41.320
<v Speaker 1>love Taylor, David. He tells you exactly what he's doing

0:13:41.400 --> 0:13:44.000
<v Speaker 1>with his cash, whether he's building cash, putting it to work.

0:13:44.040 --> 0:13:47.600
<v Speaker 1>It's really an interesting perspective, and he's one of the

0:13:47.640 --> 0:13:51.120
<v Speaker 1>guys that is the in the middle of all the

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:54.240
<v Speaker 1>craziness of Muni bonds and the technicals and actually manages

0:13:54.280 --> 0:13:56.720
<v Speaker 1>to sit down and explain it to you and great

0:13:56.800 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Muni portfolio as well. So that's certainly some fun memories. Well,

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna bring it. Ben Emmon's managing director of Global

0:14:05.400 --> 0:14:09.200
<v Speaker 1>macro Strategy at Medley Global Advisors, because I get his

0:14:09.840 --> 0:14:12.320
<v Speaker 1>research notes and the problem with his research notes is

0:14:12.360 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 1>he writes just too many of them, so whenever they

0:14:14.559 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 1>hit my inbox, I gotta stop. But I'm ever I'm

0:14:16.920 --> 0:14:19.240
<v Speaker 1>doing and read them because there's always good stuff in there.

0:14:19.280 --> 0:14:21.720
<v Speaker 1>But before we get the earnings and markets and all

0:14:21.720 --> 0:14:24.440
<v Speaker 1>that kind of stuff, I'm gonna talk space with Ben. Ben.

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 1>We saw sir Richard Branson go into space over the weekend.

0:14:28.680 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Is this a business as as an investor? Do you

0:14:31.440 --> 0:14:35.480
<v Speaker 1>pay attention to that kind of stuff? Hi? Thanks for

0:14:35.520 --> 0:14:38.280
<v Speaker 1>having us, Yeah, you'll pay attention. You know, it was

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:41.000
<v Speaker 1>obviously an amazing moments. I have to have this commercial

0:14:41.000 --> 0:14:44.120
<v Speaker 1>flights into space. You know what I think is really

0:14:44.240 --> 0:14:46.360
<v Speaker 1>good by Richard Branson is you know, he's the CEO

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 1>of the company, and he takes the risk right to

0:14:48.320 --> 0:14:51.080
<v Speaker 1>go up there because it's not without risk, and then

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:54.000
<v Speaker 1>comes down back to Earth safety and says, I just

0:14:54.040 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 1>did the customer experience that just showed you live on

0:14:56.840 --> 0:15:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Twitter in the capsule what you can experience me go

0:15:00.200 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 1>up in space. Right, So you know that's a perfect

0:15:02.840 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 1>marketing strategy. But it does highlight how far we've gotten

0:15:06.680 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 1>with this technology. And he spoke to that this was

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:11.360
<v Speaker 1>not he was dreaming about this like two thousand and

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 1>four because of seven so that they were working on

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:16.840
<v Speaker 1>these plans to get themselves up in space. So I

0:15:17.280 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 1>guess what will happen in the future will go a

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:21.120
<v Speaker 1>lot faster. Now we're gonna get a lot more flights

0:15:21.120 --> 0:15:23.760
<v Speaker 1>in the future. And if you look at that business,

0:15:23.960 --> 0:15:28.560
<v Speaker 1>you know they estimate that the total valuation of space economy.

0:15:28.600 --> 0:15:31.520
<v Speaker 1>So to speaks about how the fifty eight billion, which

0:15:31.560 --> 0:15:34.440
<v Speaker 1>is a lot of different elements to it, but you know,

0:15:34.480 --> 0:15:38.560
<v Speaker 1>as in space exploration and all kinds of industrial activity,

0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:43.640
<v Speaker 1>but that can become significantly larger with events every so yesterday,

0:15:43.680 --> 0:15:46.200
<v Speaker 1>So I think if I would put my mind into

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Kathy Wood's mind, I'd say, like she's probably right, like

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 1>this is a a new industry and Richard Branson just

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 1>took this right up lead bound with a rocket right

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 1>there yesterday. You know, you want to talk about other

0:15:58.520 --> 0:16:01.000
<v Speaker 1>things that the market is certainly in attention to. Ben.

0:16:01.040 --> 0:16:03.000
<v Speaker 1>We love that you can go across a set for us,

0:16:03.040 --> 0:16:06.360
<v Speaker 1>from space tourism to bond yields, and I feel like

0:16:06.360 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 1>we're at that sweet spot where we were happy that

0:16:09.480 --> 0:16:12.640
<v Speaker 1>bond yields came down because of the way that that

0:16:12.680 --> 0:16:16.080
<v Speaker 1>can inflate some of the equity valuations, but it's also

0:16:16.160 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 1>given us a little bit of a worrying signal about

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:21.320
<v Speaker 1>the future of economic growth. Where are you in the

0:16:21.480 --> 0:16:24.240
<v Speaker 1>sweet spot of what yields are telling you at this moment?

0:16:26.000 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 1>You're right, Taylor, there is you know something about the

0:16:29.040 --> 0:16:32.800
<v Speaker 1>climbing yields in an environment where economic data is really strong.

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:36.600
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't coinciber one another. And it reminds me a

0:16:36.640 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 1>little bit of you know, prefinential crisis and the two

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:43.000
<v Speaker 1>five beer. You know, really strong economy, strong housing market,

0:16:43.040 --> 0:16:46.640
<v Speaker 1>a lot of confidence, but yields with data decline. So

0:16:46.680 --> 0:16:48.200
<v Speaker 1>there is a bit of a dynamic on the one

0:16:48.240 --> 0:16:51.800
<v Speaker 1>hand of positioning that's that's causing that so people were

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:55.120
<v Speaker 1>short and get wrong fooded is I think improved message

0:16:55.160 --> 0:16:57.640
<v Speaker 1>by theF fect just like back then, maybe someone more

0:16:57.640 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 1>predictable what we can expect it. There's a tapering, but

0:17:00.320 --> 0:17:03.600
<v Speaker 1>there's also something about the economy itself and be made

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:06.480
<v Speaker 1>gotten to a point of of a form of overheating,

0:17:07.160 --> 0:17:09.160
<v Speaker 1>and the bond market is said like, you're gonna start

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 1>cooling off. So I come down on that debate that

0:17:11.960 --> 0:17:15.680
<v Speaker 1>yields probably this low reading because we're maybe maybe somewhat

0:17:15.680 --> 0:17:18.399
<v Speaker 1>of a cooling economy and that keeps you know, the

0:17:18.480 --> 0:17:22.320
<v Speaker 1>balances in the markets pretty solid. Right, we have low volatility,

0:17:22.880 --> 0:17:26.640
<v Speaker 1>stock market is doing fairly well. If anything, the rotation

0:17:26.720 --> 0:17:30.040
<v Speaker 1>back into the tech is also supporting other sectors. Ahead

0:17:30.080 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 1>of these earnings, I think low yields play into the

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 1>people's mind like, yes, the economy is not in the

0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 1>recession of anything, it's just moderating against really strong earnings.

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:41.000
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's it's good for markets. Ben We're

0:17:41.000 --> 0:17:44.560
<v Speaker 1>gonna have the large finance institutions begin to report earnings

0:17:44.640 --> 0:17:47.880
<v Speaker 1>this week. What are you looking for? Yeah, I think

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:51.479
<v Speaker 1>that the banks itself have obviously a tremendous base effect

0:17:51.480 --> 0:17:53.600
<v Speaker 1>and they're earning some last year. You know, your your

0:17:53.600 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 1>colleague and the Martins has these great charts on that,

0:17:57.160 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 1>and I looked up yesterday. The year and year growth

0:17:59.080 --> 0:18:01.440
<v Speaker 1>rate is unbelievable. Will will see in the next few

0:18:01.520 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 1>days it could be could these percent of some of

0:18:04.840 --> 0:18:07.520
<v Speaker 1>these cases. What you, of course will look for is

0:18:07.560 --> 0:18:11.399
<v Speaker 1>that what is really the loan demands look like on

0:18:11.440 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the ground, because now the economy is really attraction and

0:18:14.359 --> 0:18:17.360
<v Speaker 1>we're open. What's really changed there is that the kind

0:18:17.400 --> 0:18:19.439
<v Speaker 1>of the process and what they're planning to do with

0:18:19.440 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 1>all that excess liquidity they've taken up at the reserve, Yeah,

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:25.159
<v Speaker 1>the reserves and sell the excess reserves as well as

0:18:25.200 --> 0:18:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the reverse repo facility. And then obviously what they've announced

0:18:29.240 --> 0:18:31.680
<v Speaker 1>after the cess test the buy back plans that do

0:18:32.080 --> 0:18:34.919
<v Speaker 1>metical markets. I think there's expectations you could tell today

0:18:34.960 --> 0:18:37.680
<v Speaker 1>from the price section that the banks will come out

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:40.600
<v Speaker 1>not only with good earnings, but with intentions to really

0:18:40.640 --> 0:18:43.680
<v Speaker 1>further support the equity valuation. So I think banks will

0:18:43.720 --> 0:18:46.840
<v Speaker 1>do quite well in this period. Are those buy backs

0:18:46.840 --> 0:18:50.280
<v Speaker 1>boosting those valuations that you alluded to within the financial sector?

0:18:50.880 --> 0:18:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Is that broad based as well? Are we expecting to

0:18:53.040 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 1>hear in these second quarter earnings from CEO is a

0:18:55.840 --> 0:18:59.720
<v Speaker 1>lot of commentary about using this excess cash to buy

0:18:59.720 --> 0:19:03.280
<v Speaker 1>back shares. So the banks have a unique tail in

0:19:03.359 --> 0:19:06.240
<v Speaker 1>that sense, right, because you know, they basically got relief

0:19:06.880 --> 0:19:09.560
<v Speaker 1>from the Federal Reserve to start buying back shares after

0:19:09.680 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 1>a year of being excluded from that. Whereas the buy

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:15.960
<v Speaker 1>back index itself, you have an SEP SMP buy back

0:19:16.040 --> 0:19:18.040
<v Speaker 1>in next that's now, by the way, game quite a

0:19:18.040 --> 0:19:20.520
<v Speaker 1>bit of value, but the buy back levels have been low,

0:19:21.119 --> 0:19:24.639
<v Speaker 1>so yes, it could be, you know, depending upon again,

0:19:24.680 --> 0:19:26.960
<v Speaker 1>this is a signal. I think maybe what people try

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:29.760
<v Speaker 1>to connect with the strong economy and low yields is

0:19:29.800 --> 0:19:32.600
<v Speaker 1>this our earnings telling us that you know, a lot

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:34.439
<v Speaker 1>of companies sit on a lot of cash, are not

0:19:34.480 --> 0:19:37.640
<v Speaker 1>going to deploy it then investment, but buy back shares

0:19:38.080 --> 0:19:40.080
<v Speaker 1>and then in that sense would not necessary to be

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 1>a good signal. So I think it's really the banks

0:19:43.119 --> 0:19:45.440
<v Speaker 1>that will take the lead there. Because they've been given

0:19:45.480 --> 0:19:48.800
<v Speaker 1>the lead, the other companies will see, right. I think

0:19:48.840 --> 0:19:50.679
<v Speaker 1>it's a there's a lot going on in the economy,

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:52.919
<v Speaker 1>that's for sure. Hey, Ben, thanks so much for joining us.

0:19:52.920 --> 0:19:55.400
<v Speaker 1>We always appreciate chatting with you as well as your

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 1>research notes. Ben Emmon's Managing director Global macro Strategy at

0:20:00.040 --> 0:20:03.679
<v Speaker 1>Eddy Global Advisors, giving us his thoughts on these markets,

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:06.920
<v Speaker 1>on space and on some of these bank earning's coming

0:20:06.960 --> 0:20:13.760
<v Speaker 1>up this week. What we've got markets once again, equity

0:20:13.800 --> 0:20:17.119
<v Speaker 1>markets setting all time highs. And that's despite the fact

0:20:17.240 --> 0:20:21.639
<v Speaker 1>that the COVID nineteen UH is still very much with

0:20:21.760 --> 0:20:24.800
<v Speaker 1>us on a global scale. Even within the confines of

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the United States, there's there's large portions of this country

0:20:27.960 --> 0:20:30.840
<v Speaker 1>that are under vaccinated and again as a result, facing

0:20:31.119 --> 0:20:34.119
<v Speaker 1>some challenges in the delta variant. But the markets that

0:20:34.240 --> 0:20:36.480
<v Speaker 1>once was a thing for the markets, it doesn't appear

0:20:36.520 --> 0:20:39.240
<v Speaker 1>like it is as much anymore. Christina Hooper joins us.

0:20:39.240 --> 0:20:43.400
<v Speaker 1>This is chief global market strategist for Investco. UH. Why

0:20:43.400 --> 0:20:45.320
<v Speaker 1>do we like Christina because she's a very nice person

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:48.520
<v Speaker 1>to have on She's very smart and Investco has one

0:20:48.560 --> 0:20:51.800
<v Speaker 1>point three trillion in assets under management, so she knows

0:20:51.920 --> 0:20:54.360
<v Speaker 1>where the money is going. Christina, thanks so much again

0:20:54.400 --> 0:20:57.480
<v Speaker 1>for joining us here. Again, how do you think about

0:20:57.600 --> 0:20:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you gots you just take us back you

0:20:59.320 --> 0:21:02.560
<v Speaker 1>know a year plus and the markets was the narrative

0:21:02.640 --> 0:21:07.879
<v Speaker 1>was completely driven by UH you know, virus trends and

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 1>and hospitalization rates. That was really moving the market. And

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:15.120
<v Speaker 1>now even though we have vaccines, there's still some concerns

0:21:15.119 --> 0:21:19.359
<v Speaker 1>out there there. But the market just doesn't seem to care. Well,

0:21:19.440 --> 0:21:22.320
<v Speaker 1>the market, the stock market doesn't seem to care, right,

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:25.520
<v Speaker 1>but it seems as though the ten year treasury yield,

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:29.159
<v Speaker 1>the treasury market does seem to care. Now, I was

0:21:29.760 --> 0:21:33.159
<v Speaker 1>raised in this industry on the notion that quite often

0:21:33.600 --> 0:21:37.600
<v Speaker 1>the ten year treasury yield is a better indicator of

0:21:37.760 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 1>fear than anything we can find, like the vix in

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the stock market. So this could be a scenario where

0:21:44.720 --> 0:21:50.160
<v Speaker 1>we have stocks um seeing that there is economic growth

0:21:50.320 --> 0:21:54.560
<v Speaker 1>that's quite strong, um, seeing very accommodative monetary policy and

0:21:54.640 --> 0:21:57.680
<v Speaker 1>reacting one way, and then we see the ten year

0:21:57.720 --> 0:22:00.920
<v Speaker 1>treasury seeing the other side of the coin. Right, Um,

0:22:01.080 --> 0:22:03.800
<v Speaker 1>the parts of the world that aren't well vaccinated, even

0:22:03.840 --> 0:22:07.120
<v Speaker 1>the pockets of America that aren't well vaccinated, and are

0:22:07.160 --> 0:22:10.720
<v Speaker 1>suggesting there are reasons to be concerned. Um. It's it's

0:22:10.960 --> 0:22:13.480
<v Speaker 1>arguably a little bit of diversification here in terms of

0:22:13.840 --> 0:22:17.439
<v Speaker 1>the different reactions in different parts of market. Christine, if

0:22:17.440 --> 0:22:21.920
<v Speaker 1>I could politely push back on that could you argue

0:22:22.000 --> 0:22:25.679
<v Speaker 1>that spreads are also telling us about the equity markets.

0:22:25.680 --> 0:22:28.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at eighty five basis points on investment grade

0:22:28.320 --> 0:22:32.119
<v Speaker 1>over treasuries under to seventy on high yield over treasuries.

0:22:32.400 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Spreads are telling me there's nothing to worry about. What

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:38.800
<v Speaker 1>do you make of that? Well, I think that that

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:44.640
<v Speaker 1>is arguably the overarching story, right that, Um, that what

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:47.960
<v Speaker 1>we are going through right now is likely to be temporary. Um.

0:22:48.080 --> 0:22:51.119
<v Speaker 1>Last year, at this time, we did not have a

0:22:51.240 --> 0:22:55.080
<v Speaker 1>cure for COVID nineteen. We had no vaccine vaccine available,

0:22:55.359 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 1>and in fact, we were hearing from medical experts who

0:22:57.640 --> 0:23:01.040
<v Speaker 1>said that it was unlikely we get an effective vaccine

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:05.160
<v Speaker 1>against a coronavirus anytime soon. Now fast forward a year

0:23:05.200 --> 0:23:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and the scenario is very different. Our biggest problem is

0:23:07.880 --> 0:23:11.719
<v Speaker 1>vaccine rollouts. We have effective vaccines, so we know that

0:23:11.760 --> 0:23:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the challenges we're going through now are likely very temporary

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 1>in nature. All right, So Christina earnings week is kicking

0:23:20.040 --> 0:23:24.440
<v Speaker 1>off this week with the big bank earnings here. Um.

0:23:24.520 --> 0:23:30.400
<v Speaker 1>What are you looking for, uh from earnings this quarter? Well?

0:23:31.119 --> 0:23:34.199
<v Speaker 1>I think we we very much expect a strong earning

0:23:34.280 --> 0:23:37.840
<v Speaker 1>season and that should come as no surprise. Um, so

0:23:37.920 --> 0:23:41.240
<v Speaker 1>what we really want to hear from is the guidance

0:23:41.440 --> 0:23:44.399
<v Speaker 1>and the future. UM. What can we expect because there

0:23:44.440 --> 0:23:47.040
<v Speaker 1>are of course concerns that maybe this is as good

0:23:47.080 --> 0:23:49.439
<v Speaker 1>as we're going to get, and so to hear that

0:23:49.520 --> 0:23:53.199
<v Speaker 1>guidance from companies in all different industries is going to

0:23:53.240 --> 0:23:56.280
<v Speaker 1>be very, very important in terms of giving a sense

0:23:56.560 --> 0:24:00.080
<v Speaker 1>of where the stock market goes from here. UM in

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:02.959
<v Speaker 1>the back half of this year. Christina. One thing that

0:24:03.000 --> 0:24:05.199
<v Speaker 1>we love getting you on the program is because you

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:08.640
<v Speaker 1>have global in your title. What is the headline risk

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:13.360
<v Speaker 1>of investing in Chinese stocks? Given the regulatory crackdown, as

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:15.439
<v Speaker 1>we spoke last week on TV, a stroke of a

0:24:15.480 --> 0:24:18.879
<v Speaker 1>pen Beijing changes the rules. How do you think about

0:24:18.880 --> 0:24:21.040
<v Speaker 1>that as sort of a risk to a China to

0:24:21.160 --> 0:24:27.600
<v Speaker 1>an e M portfolio. Well, certainly there are regulatory risks

0:24:27.640 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 1>in all corners of one's portfolio right now. There are

0:24:31.320 --> 0:24:35.119
<v Speaker 1>concerns that we could see greater regulation of technology in

0:24:35.160 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the United States. So I think investors need to look

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:43.920
<v Speaker 1>at their portfolio with uh an eye towards where there

0:24:43.920 --> 0:24:48.000
<v Speaker 1>could be potential regulatory changes, and of course that includes

0:24:48.080 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 1>what is happening in China. UM, and that would argue

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 1>for more diversification, more potentially UM, more exposure to other

0:24:57.600 --> 0:25:01.119
<v Speaker 1>parts of emerging markets right now. UM. But but but I

0:25:01.160 --> 0:25:04.359
<v Speaker 1>would say that we can't panic about this, UM. We

0:25:04.480 --> 0:25:07.400
<v Speaker 1>just need to follow it closely and again recognize that

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 1>there are regulatory risks in all different kinds of places,

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:15.640
<v Speaker 1>including those who have UM crypto components to their portfolio. Christina,

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:19.120
<v Speaker 1>where are you and the portfolio managers investgo right now?

0:25:19.119 --> 0:25:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Where are you guys doing your most work looking for opportunities? UM? Well,

0:25:24.200 --> 0:25:29.040
<v Speaker 1>certainly every every portfolio manager is looking at their investible

0:25:29.119 --> 0:25:32.400
<v Speaker 1>universe for opportunities. UM. What I would say is when

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:34.880
<v Speaker 1>I take a step back and we're looking at it

0:25:34.960 --> 0:25:38.479
<v Speaker 1>more from a big picture perspective. UM. There are a

0:25:38.520 --> 0:25:42.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of very very interesting things going on right now, UM,

0:25:42.560 --> 0:25:47.080
<v Speaker 1>in particular areas like cyber security. UH. It's not getting

0:25:47.119 --> 0:25:50.000
<v Speaker 1>as much attention, I don't believe as it should. UM.

0:25:50.040 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 1>But this UM, this is an area that is UM

0:25:54.600 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 1>regularly cited by CEO before COVID nineteen as one of

0:25:59.760 --> 0:26:03.480
<v Speaker 1>the biggest concerns right cyber security, And so I would

0:26:03.520 --> 0:26:06.800
<v Speaker 1>anticipate that we're going to see more capex spending in general,

0:26:07.119 --> 0:26:12.040
<v Speaker 1>more capex spending on tech um more specifically and more

0:26:12.480 --> 0:26:16.520
<v Speaker 1>tech capex spending on cyber security. So that's just one

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:19.560
<v Speaker 1>theme among many, but it's one that I think deserves

0:26:19.600 --> 0:26:21.840
<v Speaker 1>a lot of attention right now. It's very interesting. We

0:26:21.840 --> 0:26:24.600
<v Speaker 1>always love getting your thoughts, Christina who per chief Global

0:26:24.680 --> 0:26:28.160
<v Speaker 1>market strategist for Investo, getting your thoughts on markets again

0:26:28.200 --> 0:26:30.359
<v Speaker 1>a big earnings week, which will give us a real

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:34.720
<v Speaker 1>view on the strength of corporate Americans. Christina was suggesting.

0:26:35.440 --> 0:26:37.879
<v Speaker 1>The focus also and maybe increasingly will be on that

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:41.600
<v Speaker 1>forward looking guidance. Uh and we'll certainly have all of

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:44.080
<v Speaker 1>that for you. This is Bloomberg. Thanks for listening to

0:26:44.080 --> 0:26:47.639
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can subscribe and listen to

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:51.840
<v Speaker 1>interviews with Apple Podcasts or whatever podcast platform you prefer.

0:26:52.240 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller V

0:26:56.000 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 1>three pint on False Swhee. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:26:59.160 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at

0:27:01.800 --> 0:27:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio.