1
00:00:00,040 --> 00:00:03,079
Speaker 1: You're listening to Bloomberg Law with June Grasso, Michael Best,

2
00:00:03,120 --> 00:00:05,840
Speaker 1: and Greg Store. In its last term, the Supreme Court

3
00:00:05,880 --> 00:00:09,520
Speaker 1: looked ready to deliver a major blow to public sector unions.

4
00:00:09,880 --> 00:00:12,360
Speaker 1: The issue is whether workers have a First Amendment right

5
00:00:12,480 --> 00:00:15,480
Speaker 1: not to contribute financially to the union that represents them

6
00:00:15,480 --> 00:00:19,000
Speaker 1: in collective bargaining. By all appearances, the Court's conservative wing

7
00:00:19,079 --> 00:00:21,440
Speaker 1: was poised to rule that workers did did not have

8
00:00:21,520 --> 00:00:24,040
Speaker 1: to pay what are known as agency fees, and along

9
00:00:24,079 --> 00:00:26,600
Speaker 1: the way, the Court would overturn a forty year old

10
00:00:26,640 --> 00:00:29,600
Speaker 1: president known as a Bood versus Detroit Board of Education.

11
00:00:30,400 --> 00:00:33,680
Speaker 1: Then Justice Anton Scalia died and deprived Conservatives of the

12
00:00:33,680 --> 00:00:36,640
Speaker 1: fifth vote they needed. The Court deadlocked four to four,

13
00:00:37,280 --> 00:00:39,800
Speaker 1: and with the prospect that Scalia's successor might be a

14
00:00:39,840 --> 00:00:42,640
Speaker 1: Democratic appointee, the issue looked like it might go away.

15
00:00:43,479 --> 00:00:45,879
Speaker 1: But then Donald Trump won the election and with it

16
00:00:45,920 --> 00:00:49,320
Speaker 1: the opportunity to appoint a Conservative to fill the Scalia seat.

17
00:00:49,720 --> 00:00:52,880
Speaker 1: That raises the prospect and perhaps the likelihood, that mandatory

18
00:00:52,920 --> 00:00:55,720
Speaker 1: agency fees are again in peril, at least in the

19
00:00:55,760 --> 00:00:58,760
Speaker 1: public sector. With us to talk about the issues the

20
00:00:58,840 --> 00:01:02,000
Speaker 1: issue once against all Secunda, a law professor at Marquette

21
00:01:02,080 --> 00:01:06,319
Speaker 1: University and now Kevin McGowan, Senior legal editor at Bloomberg

22
00:01:06,319 --> 00:01:11,520
Speaker 1: b NA. Paul, is it inevitable that the court will

23
00:01:11,520 --> 00:01:16,200
Speaker 1: take up this issue and overrule the about precedent. I

24
00:01:16,200 --> 00:01:19,880
Speaker 1: think it is likely to happen, unfortunately eventually, but it's

25
00:01:19,880 --> 00:01:22,959
Speaker 1: not going to happen quickly. The Democrats are still very

26
00:01:23,040 --> 00:01:27,080
Speaker 1: upset about being not being able to appoint a justice

27
00:01:27,120 --> 00:01:30,480
Speaker 1: to to replace Justice Clear for nine months, and I

28
00:01:30,560 --> 00:01:34,320
Speaker 1: would think that there's gonna be tremendous pushback if the

29
00:01:34,480 --> 00:01:39,160
Speaker 1: nominee from the Republicans is extremely conservative. Um Eventually, of

30
00:01:39,160 --> 00:01:41,120
Speaker 1: course it's a four year term, so they're going to

31
00:01:41,200 --> 00:01:43,880
Speaker 1: broker some kind of deal. Will just be very interesting

32
00:01:43,920 --> 00:01:47,240
Speaker 1: what kind of appointment is eventually made and whether that

33
00:01:47,360 --> 00:01:52,200
Speaker 1: person has strong feelings concerning the public's sector union mandatory

34
00:01:52,240 --> 00:01:55,360
Speaker 1: fee issue. But there are other cases that are currently

35
00:01:55,400 --> 00:01:58,440
Speaker 1: in the system that could raise the same issue that

36
00:01:58,520 --> 00:02:01,840
Speaker 1: Freedricks rose uh this year. And of course if there's

37
00:02:02,160 --> 00:02:06,640
Speaker 1: five Conservatives and and four Progressives, that could spell trouble

38
00:02:06,760 --> 00:02:11,200
Speaker 1: for public sector union mandatory dues. Kevin, this is my

39
00:02:11,400 --> 00:02:15,919
Speaker 1: best the The President elect has put out a list

40
00:02:16,040 --> 00:02:18,920
Speaker 1: of judges that he says he will use to appoint

41
00:02:19,680 --> 00:02:23,079
Speaker 1: uh somebody to the Supreme Court he campaigned on it.

42
00:02:24,160 --> 00:02:27,320
Speaker 1: Do we know if everybody on that list is going

43
00:02:27,360 --> 00:02:31,800
Speaker 1: to be against a boot and wanting to overturn it. Uh? No,

44
00:02:31,960 --> 00:02:35,600
Speaker 1: we probably don't know specifically, But I think it's probably

45
00:02:35,639 --> 00:02:40,120
Speaker 1: a pretty fair guest that any judge that a President

46
00:02:40,160 --> 00:02:42,639
Speaker 1: Trump does nominate is going to be sympathetic to the

47
00:02:42,760 --> 00:02:46,480
Speaker 1: arguments raised by the employees who aren't members of the union.

48
00:02:47,040 --> 00:02:49,040
Speaker 1: Their their argument, how along, has been they have a

49
00:02:49,080 --> 00:02:51,800
Speaker 1: first memory right not to associate with the union and

50
00:02:51,840 --> 00:02:54,799
Speaker 1: not to be forced to pay dues to union with

51
00:02:54,840 --> 00:02:57,920
Speaker 1: whom they disagree on many issues the court in the

52
00:02:57,960 --> 00:03:01,200
Speaker 1: past it's conservative branch as rule that you know, money

53
00:03:01,360 --> 00:03:06,200
Speaker 1: is speech. So there's a there's already sympathetic um, certainly

54
00:03:06,240 --> 00:03:09,600
Speaker 1: sympathy umo the flour conservative justices in the Court, and

55
00:03:09,760 --> 00:03:13,800
Speaker 1: probably sympathy from any judge that Trump would elect that

56
00:03:13,880 --> 00:03:18,720
Speaker 1: people shouldn't be compelled to support speech with which they disagree. Well,

57
00:03:18,720 --> 00:03:21,720
Speaker 1: what are some of the other issues that may come

58
00:03:21,840 --> 00:03:27,000
Speaker 1: up or before the Supreme Court involving unions. Well, some

59
00:03:27,080 --> 00:03:30,400
Speaker 1: of the other issues could be the class action waivers

60
00:03:31,160 --> 00:03:35,119
Speaker 1: h with regard to arbitration agreements. The National Labor Relations

61
00:03:35,160 --> 00:03:38,760
Speaker 1: Board has said that having class action waivers and arbitration

62
00:03:38,800 --> 00:03:42,920
Speaker 1: agreements and employment is inconsistent with rights that employees have

63
00:03:43,040 --> 00:03:46,280
Speaker 1: under Section seven of the National Labor Relations Acting, particularly

64
00:03:46,600 --> 00:03:49,880
Speaker 1: to work together concertedly to improve the conditions in their workplace.

65
00:03:50,240 --> 00:03:53,440
Speaker 1: A number of circuit courts UH federal appellate courts have

66
00:03:53,520 --> 00:03:57,200
Speaker 1: disagreed and said that the Federal Arbitration Act takes precedent

67
00:03:57,520 --> 00:03:59,880
Speaker 1: and that you're allowed to have class action waivers. There's

68
00:04:00,000 --> 00:04:04,240
Speaker 1: actually a couple of petitions for searciari right now on

69
00:04:04,280 --> 00:04:07,320
Speaker 1: that issue, and if there is a fifth Conservative Justice,

70
00:04:07,640 --> 00:04:09,800
Speaker 1: I wouldn't be surprised to see them take that case

71
00:04:10,000 --> 00:04:13,560
Speaker 1: and rule in favor of allob and class action waivers.

72
00:04:13,560 --> 00:04:15,280
Speaker 1: That is certainly one of the big ones. The other

73
00:04:15,320 --> 00:04:19,000
Speaker 1: big issue could be the joint employer doctrine issue, the

74
00:04:19,040 --> 00:04:23,160
Speaker 1: one that allows UH employees not just to sue their

75
00:04:23,960 --> 00:04:26,839
Speaker 1: franchise e owner, but the franchise or like in the

76
00:04:26,920 --> 00:04:30,600
Speaker 1: McDonald's situation. UH, there could be an interpretation of the

77
00:04:30,680 --> 00:04:35,159
Speaker 1: law that makes the broader definition recently adopted by the

78
00:04:35,279 --> 00:04:38,960
Speaker 1: National Labor Relations Boards somewhat in jeopardy. We are going

79
00:04:39,000 --> 00:04:40,960
Speaker 1: to have to leave it there. Thank you to our

80
00:04:41,000 --> 00:04:44,000
Speaker 1: guest Bloomberg B and a senior legal editor, Kevin McGowan,

81
00:04:44,400 --> 00:04:47,920
Speaker 1: and Paul Secunda, a law professor at Marquette University, talking

82
00:04:47,960 --> 00:04:51,880
Speaker 1: about the impact the Supreme Court might have on labor

83
00:04:51,960 --> 00:04:55,600
Speaker 1: law and labor unions. Still still to come here on

84
00:04:55,640 --> 00:04:58,960
Speaker 1: Bloomberg Law. Some new developments in the big legal fight

85
00:04:59,080 --> 00:05:03,640
Speaker 1: over breakfast brexit Brexit excuse me, and we'll talk about

86
00:05:04,000 --> 00:05:07,479
Speaker 1: the possibility of protesters at the Trump inaugural parade and

87
00:05:07,560 --> 00:05:10,560
Speaker 1: where those people can stand. That's all coming up on

88
00:05:10,600 --> 00:05:15,599
Speaker 1: Bloomberg Law. This is Bloomberg. Yeah,