WEBVTT - Ep17 "What is consciousness?"

0:00:04.640 --> 0:00:08.280
<v Speaker 1>How do your billions of tiny brain cells with their

0:00:08.320 --> 0:00:14.159
<v Speaker 1>electrical spikes build consciousness? And why is your laptop, with

0:00:14.240 --> 0:00:19.280
<v Speaker 1>its billions of parts and tiny electrical signals, presumably not conscious?

0:00:19.920 --> 0:00:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Could other large systems like a city be conscious? And

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>what does any of this have to do with ant

0:00:25.880 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>hills or bluebirds or your memory of your first kiss?

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Inner Cosmos with me David Eagleman. I'm a

0:00:37.000 --> 0:00:40.920
<v Speaker 1>neuroscientist and an author at Stanford University, and I've spent

0:00:40.960 --> 0:00:45.200
<v Speaker 1>my whole career studying the intersection between how the brain

0:00:45.280 --> 0:00:49.479
<v Speaker 1>works and how we experience life. And there's hardly a

0:00:49.479 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 1>better example of this intersection than consciousness. Your feeling of

0:00:55.960 --> 0:01:00.240
<v Speaker 1>being aware of your surroundings and your own existence, your

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>ability to experience and feel things. This somehow emerges from

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:10.480
<v Speaker 1>the activity of our brains, and it is our experience

0:01:10.520 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 1>of life. So today we're going to dive deep into

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 1>a big question, possibly the central question of neurobiology. What

0:01:20.640 --> 0:01:24.679
<v Speaker 1>is consciousness. We'll talk about how we can define it,

0:01:24.920 --> 0:01:28.040
<v Speaker 1>why it's a challenge for our science to capture it,

0:01:28.560 --> 0:01:32.399
<v Speaker 1>and whether other things could be conscious. So think back

0:01:32.440 --> 0:01:36.600
<v Speaker 1>to your first kiss. The memory of it pops back

0:01:36.640 --> 0:01:40.360
<v Speaker 1>into your head in an instant, But where was that

0:01:40.600 --> 0:01:45.160
<v Speaker 1>image before you became conscious of it, that feeling, the

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:48.320
<v Speaker 1>name of the person, How is it represented in your

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:52.800
<v Speaker 1>brain before and after I ask you to think about it.

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 1>What's the difference between those two states? In other words,

0:01:56.800 --> 0:02:04.560
<v Speaker 1>what events in the brain constitute awareness or consciousness. I

0:02:04.640 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>made an earlier episode about all the things going on

0:02:07.720 --> 0:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>in your head unconsciously without any access or awareness on

0:02:12.480 --> 0:02:16.720
<v Speaker 1>your part, and the upshot there was that at any moment,

0:02:16.880 --> 0:02:20.320
<v Speaker 1>there's an enormous amount of activity going on in your brain,

0:02:21.040 --> 0:02:25.639
<v Speaker 1>one hundred billion cells having little electrical spikes tens or

0:02:25.720 --> 0:02:29.680
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of times per second, and you are not consciously

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:33.000
<v Speaker 1>aware of almost any of that activity in your brain.

0:02:33.760 --> 0:02:38.280
<v Speaker 1>But a tiny, tiny bit of that activity is conscious.

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:42.560
<v Speaker 1>And so for this episode we're turning to that tiny

0:02:42.680 --> 0:02:46.280
<v Speaker 1>tiny bit and the question of what is different about

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:49.680
<v Speaker 1>that activity than all the other activity in your brain,

0:02:50.160 --> 0:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and why it's such a challenge for us to figure

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:56.840
<v Speaker 1>out how to translate that activity in your brain into

0:02:57.000 --> 0:03:03.240
<v Speaker 1>your private, colorful experience of the world. The explanation of

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:08.280
<v Speaker 1>consciousness is one of the major unsolved problems of modern neuroscience,

0:03:08.400 --> 0:03:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and possibly the most important. So first, what is consciousness.

0:03:13.760 --> 0:03:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Defining it is the first step to the problem. So

0:03:17.280 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>there are lots of ways to try to wrap our

0:03:19.560 --> 0:03:22.040
<v Speaker 1>arms around it. But the definition that I think will

0:03:22.040 --> 0:03:26.800
<v Speaker 1>get us started the fastest is to say consciousness is

0:03:26.840 --> 0:03:29.480
<v Speaker 1>the thing that flickers to life when you wake up

0:03:29.520 --> 0:03:32.920
<v Speaker 1>in the morning. I mean, think about how wacky this is.

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:36.200
<v Speaker 1>You have the same brain the moment before you wake

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:39.400
<v Speaker 1>up in the moment after, but something just changed a

0:03:39.440 --> 0:03:42.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit about the activity, the way the signals are

0:03:42.240 --> 0:03:46.600
<v Speaker 1>moving around, and suddenly you're conscious. Whereas a moment ago

0:03:47.040 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 1>you were just lying there like a sack of potatoes.

0:03:50.120 --> 0:03:52.920
<v Speaker 1>You had the same brain, but you weren't aware of anything.

0:03:53.680 --> 0:03:57.000
<v Speaker 1>But now your brain cells start to run a slightly

0:03:57.040 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 1>different algorithm, and suddenly you're aware of your existence, of

0:04:01.960 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 1>your name, of your history, and your bedroom and the

0:04:06.840 --> 0:04:09.920
<v Speaker 1>smell of coffee and the feel of your sheets and

0:04:10.000 --> 0:04:11.040
<v Speaker 1>the details of.

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:11.960
<v Speaker 2>The room around you.

0:04:12.200 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 1>Now, weirdly, what you're experiencing is a private experience. It's

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:22.480
<v Speaker 1>what we call a subjective experience. It's not objective, which

0:04:22.480 --> 0:04:26.480
<v Speaker 1>is something we can measure and agree on a shared reality. Instead,

0:04:26.600 --> 0:04:30.520
<v Speaker 1>only you are experiencing it. So if there's someone else

0:04:30.560 --> 0:04:32.680
<v Speaker 1>in the bedroom when you wake up and that person

0:04:32.800 --> 0:04:36.120
<v Speaker 1>is looking around, there are different things going on in

0:04:36.160 --> 0:04:42.119
<v Speaker 1>that head, different thoughts, different feelings, a different subjective experience. Okay,

0:04:42.160 --> 0:04:45.359
<v Speaker 1>so imagine you're there and you roll over and you

0:04:45.400 --> 0:04:47.559
<v Speaker 1>look at a painting on your wall and you see

0:04:47.560 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the colors. Now, what's happening inside your brain is that

0:04:53.360 --> 0:04:57.680
<v Speaker 1>different wavelengths of light are bouncing off the painting and

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:02.600
<v Speaker 1>they're activating particular color photoreceptors in the back of your eyes,

0:05:04.480 --> 0:05:07.640
<v Speaker 1>which sends signals back to your brain through the optic nerve,

0:05:08.200 --> 0:05:12.440
<v Speaker 1>and in the brain, cells in the visual cortex start activating.

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:15.960
<v Speaker 1>And if you had a magical microscope by which you

0:05:16.000 --> 0:05:18.560
<v Speaker 1>could view what was happening in the brain, you'd see

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:22.359
<v Speaker 1>that you have a vast pattern of cells in the

0:05:22.400 --> 0:05:25.480
<v Speaker 1>back of the brain that activate when you look at

0:05:25.720 --> 0:05:29.200
<v Speaker 1>one painting color, and a different pattern of cells that

0:05:29.240 --> 0:05:32.320
<v Speaker 1>activate when you look at a different color. But the

0:05:32.440 --> 0:05:36.280
<v Speaker 1>question is why do you perceive the red in the

0:05:36.279 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 1>painting as red? There's just a particular wavelength of light

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:45.360
<v Speaker 1>associated with your private subjective experience of seeing red.

0:05:45.760 --> 0:05:48.120
<v Speaker 2>But the redness is something made.

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:50.479
<v Speaker 1>Up by the brain and could just as easily be

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:54.039
<v Speaker 1>perceived by you as blue or green or anything else.

0:05:54.920 --> 0:05:58.680
<v Speaker 1>So why does this particular pattern of cells equally a

0:05:58.760 --> 0:06:03.920
<v Speaker 1>particular color. These are called qualia. Qualia are the features

0:06:03.960 --> 0:06:08.120
<v Speaker 1>of our experience, the internal experiences that are associated with

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:12.359
<v Speaker 1>conscious states. The redness of red in this case, or

0:06:12.440 --> 0:06:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the sweetness of sugar, or the pain of a headache,

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:21.000
<v Speaker 1>these are called qualia. Now, these are irreducible, which means

0:06:21.000 --> 0:06:24.960
<v Speaker 1>they can't be described in terms of something else. And

0:06:25.000 --> 0:06:28.040
<v Speaker 1>by the way, they're also ineffable, which means they can't

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 1>be fully explained or described in words like if I

0:06:32.200 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>ask you, what does an avocado taste like, how are

0:06:35.120 --> 0:06:37.000
<v Speaker 1>you going to answer that. Let's say that I tell

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:39.480
<v Speaker 1>you I've never eaten an avocado, and I really want

0:06:39.560 --> 0:06:42.039
<v Speaker 1>you to tell me what that experience is. It's not

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:45.719
<v Speaker 1>something that you can directly transmit to me, because it's

0:06:45.839 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 1>an experience that's private to you and generally cannot be

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 1>reduced to words. The last piece of the foundation that

0:06:54.240 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 1>we need is that when you look in the brain,

0:06:57.680 --> 0:07:00.640
<v Speaker 1>it's all just neural signals going on, and all those

0:07:00.680 --> 0:07:03.719
<v Speaker 1>signals look exactly the same. So if I opened up

0:07:03.760 --> 0:07:06.600
<v Speaker 1>a little window somewhere in the skull and showed you

0:07:06.680 --> 0:07:09.240
<v Speaker 1>just a little bit of brain tissue. And I used

0:07:09.320 --> 0:07:12.160
<v Speaker 1>that magical microscope so you can see all the spikes

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 1>zipping around.

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:14.440
<v Speaker 2>And I said to you, hey.

0:07:14.440 --> 0:07:17.720
<v Speaker 1>Are we looking at the visual cortex here, or the

0:07:18.160 --> 0:07:21.840
<v Speaker 1>auditory or the somatosensory or some other part. You wouldn't

0:07:21.840 --> 0:07:24.000
<v Speaker 1>be able to tell me. I wouldn't be able to

0:07:24.000 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 1>tell you because it's all the same stuff going on

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:30.280
<v Speaker 1>in there. It all looks the same. There aren't spikes

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:33.160
<v Speaker 1>that equate to consciousness and other spikes that are running

0:07:33.160 --> 0:07:37.320
<v Speaker 1>around unconsciously. It's all cells and spikes, and they all

0:07:37.360 --> 0:07:42.160
<v Speaker 1>look alike. So why do some patterns of signals mean

0:07:42.200 --> 0:07:46.680
<v Speaker 1>the color red and others mean the smell of apple pie,

0:07:46.800 --> 0:07:50.360
<v Speaker 1>and others mean the pain of a paper cut. It's

0:07:50.400 --> 0:07:52.960
<v Speaker 1>all just signals and networks of cells. It's all the

0:07:53.040 --> 0:07:56.600
<v Speaker 1>same stuff running around. And so this is really the

0:07:56.640 --> 0:07:59.600
<v Speaker 1>heart of the mystery. The brain is made up of

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:03.120
<v Speaker 1>lots of cells, eighty six billion neurons and about as

0:08:03.160 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 1>many glial cells. But they're just cells. And the brain,

0:08:06.640 --> 0:08:09.240
<v Speaker 1>as far as we can tell, is just a giant

0:08:09.640 --> 0:08:14.240
<v Speaker 1>machine that's made out of biological wetwear. It's an enormous

0:08:14.280 --> 0:08:18.760
<v Speaker 1>and quite alien computational device. But every cell in the

0:08:18.800 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 1>brain is driven by the activity of other cells, and

0:08:23.200 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 1>so no matter how complex the whole system is, it

0:08:26.040 --> 0:08:29.560
<v Speaker 1>appears to be fundamentally a machine in which each sequence

0:08:29.600 --> 0:08:33.120
<v Speaker 1>of actions is leading to the next sequence. It doesn't

0:08:33.320 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>appear that there's some extra bit in the brain that's

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:40.560
<v Speaker 1>not just about the physical stuff. And so somehow we

0:08:40.600 --> 0:08:44.079
<v Speaker 1>need to look for consciousness in the physical stuff. And

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:48.760
<v Speaker 1>we know that consciousness depends on the details in the brain,

0:08:49.520 --> 0:08:53.400
<v Speaker 1>because even very small damage to your brain can change

0:08:53.760 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 1>your consciousness. For example, if your brain is badly damaged,

0:08:57.960 --> 0:09:01.520
<v Speaker 1>you can end up in a coma without consciousness. Your

0:09:01.520 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 1>brain changes and your consciousness changes. But this happens in

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:06.199
<v Speaker 1>much more subtle ways.

0:09:06.240 --> 0:09:06.720
<v Speaker 2>Every day.

0:09:06.960 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>When you ingest alcohol, the little ethanol molecules interact with

0:09:12.080 --> 0:09:16.480
<v Speaker 1>your cells and your consciousness changes. Same with drugs, same

0:09:16.520 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 1>with fatigue, same with low blood sugar. Or if you've

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:23.200
<v Speaker 1>ever known someone who had a stroke, or got a

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:27.760
<v Speaker 1>brain tumor, or had a traumatic brain injury, their consciousness

0:09:27.800 --> 0:09:32.080
<v Speaker 1>can change pretty drastically. So we know that consciousness is

0:09:32.200 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 1>intimately tied to the details of what's going on in

0:09:35.760 --> 0:09:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the brain. Now, the French philosopher Renee Descartes thought that

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the physical and the mental were separate. Essentially, there's a

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 1>separate soul, and that was maybe a reasonable starting guess,

0:09:48.400 --> 0:09:52.800
<v Speaker 1>but centuries of neurology have taught us otherwise. When the

0:09:52.880 --> 0:09:58.000
<v Speaker 1>brain changes, your consciousness changes. You are your brain. You

0:09:58.320 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 1>can get a surgery and replace your heart entirely with

0:10:01.080 --> 0:10:03.800
<v Speaker 1>an artificial heart, and you're really no different. You can

0:10:03.840 --> 0:10:06.840
<v Speaker 1>get a kidney removed, and you're really no different. But

0:10:07.000 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 1>even a very tiny change in the brain makes a

0:10:10.760 --> 0:10:15.360
<v Speaker 1>giant difference to your conscious experience. Now, the amazing thing

0:10:15.440 --> 0:10:18.600
<v Speaker 1>is that modern biology knows a lot about what is

0:10:18.679 --> 0:10:21.720
<v Speaker 1>happening inside the human body, all the way down to

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:25.720
<v Speaker 1>cells and the contents of cells, to the genome and

0:10:25.760 --> 0:10:28.439
<v Speaker 1>the molecules that make up the proteins and so on.

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:33.320
<v Speaker 1>But where are you in that picture? Why are you

0:10:33.400 --> 0:10:37.479
<v Speaker 1>someone who cares about your life and listens to podcasts

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:41.800
<v Speaker 1>and has desires and fears and aspirations and tastes and

0:10:41.840 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 1>so on. One of my mentors, the late Francis Krik,

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:48.240
<v Speaker 1>had a chalkboard in his office and it was busy

0:10:48.280 --> 0:10:51.120
<v Speaker 1>with lots of scribbles, but there was one word right

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 1>in the center, and that was meaning. And what he

0:10:55.000 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 1>was reaching for with that was why in the world

0:10:58.040 --> 0:11:01.280
<v Speaker 1>does any stimulus mean mean something to us? Why do

0:11:01.360 --> 0:11:04.480
<v Speaker 1>you care about anything? How do you run a bunch

0:11:04.520 --> 0:11:09.040
<v Speaker 1>of activity through cells and get meaning? This is really

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:12.440
<v Speaker 1>the question of consciousness, and it's a difficult problem for

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 1>neuroscience to tackle. In part, it's because the language we

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:20.760
<v Speaker 1>have in science doesn't tell us how to translate from

0:11:20.800 --> 0:11:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the realm of the physical to the realm of subjective experience.

0:11:26.160 --> 0:11:29.800
<v Speaker 1>I can't write down an equation that captures the activity

0:11:29.800 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 1>in a bunch of cells and then I say, okay, look,

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:34.000
<v Speaker 1>just do a double integral here and add something and

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:37.760
<v Speaker 1>carry the five. And that is the feeling of rain

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:40.880
<v Speaker 1>on a hot day, or the feeling of silk between

0:11:40.920 --> 0:11:45.720
<v Speaker 1>your fingertips, or the sound of a saxophone and a stairwell.

0:11:46.160 --> 0:11:49.240
<v Speaker 1>So science doesn't seem to have the language, at least

0:11:49.320 --> 0:12:09.440
<v Speaker 1>not yet, to translate from the objective to the subjective. Really,

0:12:09.480 --> 0:12:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the easiest way to see what's weird about consciousness is

0:12:13.120 --> 0:12:18.040
<v Speaker 1>to think about other big, complex systems that presumably don't

0:12:18.040 --> 0:12:21.560
<v Speaker 1>have consciousness. So imagine I were to hand you one

0:12:21.640 --> 0:12:25.200
<v Speaker 1>hundred billion tinker toys. You remember those old toys with

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 1>metal rods and connectors, and you can build pulleys and

0:12:28.080 --> 0:12:28.600
<v Speaker 1>levers and.

0:12:28.600 --> 0:12:29.520
<v Speaker 2>Any kind of structure.

0:12:29.840 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 1>Now, these tinker toys that I hand you are physical

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:36.400
<v Speaker 1>things that can interact. So you push this one and

0:12:36.440 --> 0:12:38.760
<v Speaker 1>that pulls this and shifts that, and pulls this one

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:42.120
<v Speaker 1>down and moves that one sideways. Each piece interacts with

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the other pieces around it, just like the brain. So

0:12:45.240 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 1>the question is, can you build a tinker toy structure

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:53.880
<v Speaker 1>that is large enough, sophisticated enough that the whole thing

0:12:54.000 --> 0:12:58.320
<v Speaker 1>becomes conscious? At what point do you say, Okay, I'm

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:00.520
<v Speaker 1>going to add this one more piece and can here

0:13:00.960 --> 0:13:05.320
<v Speaker 1>and now it's enjoying the beauty of a flower, or

0:13:05.440 --> 0:13:09.960
<v Speaker 1>now it's perceiving the color indigo blue, or now it's

0:13:10.040 --> 0:13:15.319
<v Speaker 1>experiencing the smell of sunscreen on the beach. Or consider this,

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:19.719
<v Speaker 1>What is the difference between your brain and your laptop.

0:13:19.880 --> 0:13:22.120
<v Speaker 1>As I said at the beginning, your brain is shuttling

0:13:22.160 --> 0:13:26.400
<v Speaker 1>signals all around, and so is your laptop. But presumably

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:31.400
<v Speaker 1>your computer doesn't feel anything. It's just running algorithms. When

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 1>you launch a funny YouTube video, it might make you laugh,

0:13:35.600 --> 0:13:40.239
<v Speaker 1>but your computer doesn't feel amused or thrilled or surprised

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:44.800
<v Speaker 1>or mirthful. It's just moving around voltages through billions of gates.

0:13:45.440 --> 0:13:49.640
<v Speaker 1>So what is the difference between you and it? Why

0:13:49.679 --> 0:13:54.440
<v Speaker 1>do electrical signals in the computer equal logical operations or

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:59.040
<v Speaker 1>pixel colors, while electrical signals zapping around in your brain

0:13:59.600 --> 0:14:03.080
<v Speaker 1>equate to the sweetness of sugar or the sting of

0:14:03.240 --> 0:14:06.839
<v Speaker 1>wabi or the feeling of love. Why do we have

0:14:06.920 --> 0:14:12.680
<v Speaker 1>this internal theater instead of running like tinker toys or laptops. Now,

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:15.160
<v Speaker 1>one thing to note is we're tackling this question is

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 1>that consciousness seems to have evolved because it is useful.

0:14:19.680 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Consciousness is like a high level operating system. So back

0:14:23.520 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 1>in the day, you'd program computers directly with punch cards

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:32.720
<v Speaker 1>or in machine language, But eventually we developed user interfaces

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:37.080
<v Speaker 1>like Windows, which hid all of the complex operations of

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the computer and allowed us to just deal with the

0:14:40.080 --> 0:14:43.120
<v Speaker 1>stuff we needed at the highest level. I just want

0:14:43.160 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 1>to move this thing over here, and send this email

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:49.720
<v Speaker 1>and drop this picture, And that's essentially what consciousness seems

0:14:49.760 --> 0:14:51.800
<v Speaker 1>to be. It's a way for us to just have

0:14:51.880 --> 0:14:55.280
<v Speaker 1>the highest level picture of what's going on, Like let's

0:14:55.320 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 1>go get some breakfast and go for a walk. Without

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:01.280
<v Speaker 1>needing to deal with all the billion details of how

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:03.880
<v Speaker 1>your muscles are contracting and how you're getting oxygen to

0:15:03.880 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 1>the right places and which chemicals need to be expressed.

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 1>We just get the windows without all the machine code. Okay,

0:15:12.800 --> 0:15:15.240
<v Speaker 1>So let's return to the central question. How do you

0:15:15.480 --> 0:15:19.240
<v Speaker 1>build consciousness out of cells? In other words, how do

0:15:19.320 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 1>you get some magical high level property from simple low

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:27.800
<v Speaker 1>level parts. Now that sounds impossible, but the first thing

0:15:27.800 --> 0:15:31.800
<v Speaker 1>to understand is the concept of an emergent property. To

0:15:31.960 --> 0:15:35.360
<v Speaker 1>understand consciousness, we may need to think not in terms

0:15:35.360 --> 0:15:38.280
<v Speaker 1>of the pieces and parts of the brain, but instead

0:15:38.320 --> 0:15:41.400
<v Speaker 1>in terms of how they all interact with each other.

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>So if we want to understand how simple parts can

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:47.880
<v Speaker 1>give rise to something bigger than themselves, just think of

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:51.880
<v Speaker 1>something like an ant hill, look at something like leafcutter.

0:15:52.000 --> 0:15:52.400
<v Speaker 2>Ants.

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:57.040
<v Speaker 1>They've got millions of members in a colony, and they

0:15:57.080 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 1>act like farmers. They actually cultivate their own food. Different

0:16:00.840 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>ants have different roles. Some leave the nest to find

0:16:05.760 --> 0:16:08.880
<v Speaker 1>fresh vegetation, and when they find it, they chew off

0:16:08.960 --> 0:16:12.280
<v Speaker 1>large pieces that they carry back to the nest. But

0:16:12.320 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 1>they don't eat the leaves instead. What happens is these

0:16:16.120 --> 0:16:19.160
<v Speaker 1>smaller worker ants take the pieces of leaves and they

0:16:19.200 --> 0:16:22.200
<v Speaker 1>chew them into smaller pieces, and they use this as

0:16:22.440 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 1>fertilizer to grow fungus in large underground gardens. So the

0:16:28.960 --> 0:16:33.280
<v Speaker 1>ants feed the fungus, and the fungus blossoms into small

0:16:33.400 --> 0:16:36.960
<v Speaker 1>fruiting bodies which the ants later eat. So they use

0:16:37.000 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 1>this incredible farming strategy to build enormous nests underground that

0:16:42.840 --> 0:16:46.880
<v Speaker 1>extend sometimes hundreds of square meters. So, just like humans,

0:16:46.920 --> 0:16:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the leafcutter ants have built and perfected an agricultural civilization.

0:16:52.520 --> 0:16:53.760
<v Speaker 2>But here's the important point.

0:16:53.840 --> 0:16:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Although the colony is like a superorganism that accomplishes these

0:16:58.640 --> 0:17:04.200
<v Speaker 1>extraordinary feats, each ant individually behaves just like a simple

0:17:04.200 --> 0:17:08.600
<v Speaker 1>little robot. It just follows its local rules. The queen

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:13.560
<v Speaker 1>isn't giving commands and coordinating behavior. Instead, each ant just

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:18.000
<v Speaker 1>reacts to local chemical signals from other ants, or from

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 1>larvae or intruders, or food.

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:21.800
<v Speaker 2>Or waste or leaves.

0:17:22.080 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 1>Each ant is just a simple autonomous unit whose reactions

0:17:26.840 --> 0:17:31.640
<v Speaker 1>depend only on its local environment and its genetically encoded rules.

0:17:32.440 --> 0:17:37.919
<v Speaker 1>So even though there's no centralized decision making, the colony

0:17:38.119 --> 0:17:44.000
<v Speaker 1>exhibits very sophisticated behavior. Each ant communicates locally with no

0:17:44.200 --> 0:17:47.040
<v Speaker 1>sense of the bigger picture. But what emerges at the

0:17:47.160 --> 0:17:53.840
<v Speaker 1>level of the colony is an agricultural civilization. So the

0:17:53.880 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 1>important lesson here is that the complex behavior of the

0:17:57.359 --> 0:18:03.399
<v Speaker 1>colony doesn't arise from complexity in the individuals. Each ant

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 1>doesn't know that it's part of something bigger. It's just

0:18:05.960 --> 0:18:10.240
<v Speaker 1>running its small, simple programs. But when enough ants come together,

0:18:10.920 --> 0:18:16.440
<v Speaker 1>a super organism emerges with collective properties that are more

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:21.080
<v Speaker 1>sophisticated than its basic parts, and this phenomenon is known

0:18:21.119 --> 0:18:25.480
<v Speaker 1>as emergence. This is what happens when simple units interact

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:29.840
<v Speaker 1>in the right ways and something larger emerges. The key

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:34.200
<v Speaker 1>thing is the interaction between lots of ants, and this

0:18:34.320 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 1>is what's going on with the brain. A neuron is

0:18:37.920 --> 0:18:40.160
<v Speaker 1>just a type of cell. It's just like the other

0:18:40.320 --> 0:18:43.919
<v Speaker 1>cells in your body, but with some specializations that allow

0:18:43.960 --> 0:18:49.680
<v Speaker 1>it to extend processes and propagate these electrical signals. But

0:18:49.880 --> 0:18:53.040
<v Speaker 1>like an ant, an individual brain cell is just running

0:18:53.080 --> 0:18:56.560
<v Speaker 1>its local programs its whole life. It just carries these

0:18:56.600 --> 0:19:00.879
<v Speaker 1>electrical signals along its membrane. It spits out neuro transmitters

0:19:01.040 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 1>it gets spat on by other cells.

0:19:03.840 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 2>That's it.

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:09.320
<v Speaker 1>It lives its life in darkness, embedded in other cells.

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:13.320
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't know if it's involved in moving your eyes

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:16.199
<v Speaker 1>to read a Tony Morrison novel, or it's involved in

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:19.600
<v Speaker 1>moving your hands over the piano keyboard to play Mozart.

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:23.440
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't know about you. So here's what's so weird.

0:19:23.480 --> 0:19:28.760
<v Speaker 1>Although your goals and intentions and abilities are completely dependent

0:19:28.960 --> 0:19:32.520
<v Speaker 1>on the existence of these little neurons, they live on

0:19:32.600 --> 0:19:36.600
<v Speaker 1>a smaller scale with no awareness of the thing they

0:19:36.640 --> 0:19:40.840
<v Speaker 1>have come together to build you. But get enough of

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:44.479
<v Speaker 1>these basic brain cells together interacting the right way, and

0:19:44.560 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the mind emerges. And I'll talk more about this notion

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:51.720
<v Speaker 1>of emergent properties in other episodes, because the concept is

0:19:51.760 --> 0:19:57.400
<v Speaker 1>so fundamental. Everywhere you look you find systems with emergent properties.

0:19:57.840 --> 0:20:01.080
<v Speaker 1>Take an airplane. If you take any single hunk of

0:20:01.160 --> 0:20:04.560
<v Speaker 1>metal on the airplane, not a single one of these

0:20:04.640 --> 0:20:08.400
<v Speaker 1>pieces has the property of flight. But when you arrange

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 1>all the pieces in the right way, flight emerges. Or

0:20:13.560 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 1>imagine a bunch of metal poles. None has the property

0:20:17.480 --> 0:20:21.840
<v Speaker 1>of constraining the behavior of a lion, but arrange several

0:20:21.840 --> 0:20:24.320
<v Speaker 1>of these poles in the shape of a cage and

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:30.400
<v Speaker 1>the property of lion constraining emerges. And somehow you get

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:32.879
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of simple cells together and you wire them

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:37.919
<v Speaker 1>up in the right way, and consciousness emerges. So the

0:20:37.960 --> 0:20:41.400
<v Speaker 1>pieces in parts of a system can be individually simple,

0:20:41.720 --> 0:20:44.919
<v Speaker 1>but what emerges at a higher level is all about

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:49.879
<v Speaker 1>their interaction. So the mind seems to emerge from the

0:20:49.920 --> 0:20:52.800
<v Speaker 1>interaction of the billions of pieces and parts of the brain.

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:56.639
<v Speaker 1>But this leads to a wacky question. Can a mind

0:20:56.880 --> 0:21:01.520
<v Speaker 1>emerge from anything with lots of inter acting parts? For example,

0:21:01.840 --> 0:21:05.800
<v Speaker 1>could a city be conscious? After all, a city is

0:21:05.840 --> 0:21:09.320
<v Speaker 1>built on the interactions between elements. Think of all the

0:21:09.440 --> 0:21:12.680
<v Speaker 1>signals moving through a city. You've got telephone wires and

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 1>fiber optic lines and sewers carrying waste, and every handshake

0:21:17.119 --> 0:21:20.240
<v Speaker 1>between humans, and every traffic light and so on. This

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:24.080
<v Speaker 1>scale of interaction in a city is on par with

0:21:24.119 --> 0:21:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the human brain. Now, it would be very hard to

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:29.680
<v Speaker 1>know if a city were conscious, because it doesn't have

0:21:30.200 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 1>ears and a mouth, and so how could it tell us?

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:36.439
<v Speaker 1>How could we ask it? To answer a question like

0:21:36.520 --> 0:21:42.000
<v Speaker 1>this requires a deeper question. For a network to experience consciousness,

0:21:42.080 --> 0:21:45.160
<v Speaker 1>does it need more than just a number of parts,

0:21:45.240 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 1>but beyond that a very particular structure to the interactions,

0:21:51.040 --> 0:21:53.000
<v Speaker 1>and that leads us to what we have in terms

0:21:53.040 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 1>of scientific theories of consciousness. By the way, just a

0:21:57.400 --> 0:22:00.439
<v Speaker 1>side note before we get into the scientific theories. For

0:22:00.520 --> 0:22:03.320
<v Speaker 1>the purposes of this episode, we'll assume that everyone is

0:22:03.359 --> 0:22:06.840
<v Speaker 1>having the same type of conscious experience. What's interesting is

0:22:06.880 --> 0:22:10.000
<v Speaker 1>that we don't really have any idea how to measure consciousness,

0:22:10.000 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 1>so we don't really know if other people are conscious.

0:22:13.600 --> 0:22:18.240
<v Speaker 1>And there's a branch of philosophy called sollipsism, which suggests

0:22:18.280 --> 0:22:20.879
<v Speaker 1>that you are the only conscious person in the world

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:24.760
<v Speaker 1>and everyone else is not conscious. They're just moving zeros

0:22:24.760 --> 0:22:27.159
<v Speaker 1>and ones around and saying the right things and acting

0:22:27.160 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 1>in the right way. But let's not go there. I

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:32.800
<v Speaker 1>think it's a reasonable assumption to take on board the

0:22:32.880 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 1>notion that everyone around you is conscious and having private

0:22:37.800 --> 0:22:42.040
<v Speaker 1>internal experiences just like you are. So one way you

0:22:42.040 --> 0:22:46.880
<v Speaker 1>could go about studying consciousness scientifically is by saying, when

0:22:46.920 --> 0:22:51.119
<v Speaker 1>you are seeing the color orange, what are the neurons

0:22:51.119 --> 0:22:54.879
<v Speaker 1>that are lighting up? And when you're tasting cinnamon, which

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:57.480
<v Speaker 1>neurons are popping off? Or when you're conscious of a

0:22:57.640 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 1>face or conscious of a touch or a sound, What

0:23:01.400 --> 0:23:04.919
<v Speaker 1>precisely can we measure in the brain. Now, this is

0:23:04.960 --> 0:23:08.520
<v Speaker 1>an endeavor that was emphasized by scientists like Francis Krik

0:23:08.560 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and Christoph Coch. They said, hey, as the first step here,

0:23:12.359 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 1>let's try to find the neural correlates of consciousness, as in,

0:23:17.359 --> 0:23:19.959
<v Speaker 1>when you are conscious of something, what is lighting up

0:23:19.960 --> 0:23:22.720
<v Speaker 1>in your brain. One way you can study this is

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:27.080
<v Speaker 1>by looking at something like binocular rivalry. So I'll explain

0:23:27.119 --> 0:23:29.240
<v Speaker 1>what that is. Let's say that your two eyes are

0:23:29.240 --> 0:23:33.120
<v Speaker 1>seeing very different images. In your left eye, I show

0:23:33.160 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 1>you a picture of a shoe, and in your right eye,

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 1>I show you a picture of a house, and there's

0:23:38.080 --> 0:23:40.879
<v Speaker 1>a piece of cardboard in between your eyes, so that

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:44.320
<v Speaker 1>each eye is just seeing one thing, the shoe.

0:23:44.160 --> 0:23:44.760
<v Speaker 2>Or the house.

0:23:45.520 --> 0:23:48.679
<v Speaker 1>Your conscious experience is not of seeing them both at

0:23:48.680 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the same time or a fusion. Instead, you see one

0:23:53.680 --> 0:23:56.679
<v Speaker 1>and then after a few seconds it switches and you

0:23:56.680 --> 0:23:59.199
<v Speaker 1>see the other. You see the shoe, and then you

0:23:59.200 --> 0:24:01.639
<v Speaker 1>see the house, and then it's back to the shoe,

0:24:02.080 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 1>and it switches every few seconds. And it's not because

0:24:05.040 --> 0:24:07.920
<v Speaker 1>you're moving your eyes around or something. It just happens

0:24:08.000 --> 0:24:10.879
<v Speaker 1>as your brain lands on one percept or lands on

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the other. So if I ask you about your conscious experience,

0:24:15.000 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 1>you are seeing either the shoe or you're seeing the

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 1>house at any given moment. So you can use experiments

0:24:21.640 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 1>like this to then look for the correlates of consciousness.

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:27.920
<v Speaker 1>You can map which areas of the brain are firing

0:24:27.960 --> 0:24:31.159
<v Speaker 1>when you're conscious of the shoe versus the house. We

0:24:31.240 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 1>can look for what is different about the patterns of

0:24:34.040 --> 0:24:37.320
<v Speaker 1>neural activity in the moments when you're perceiving the shoe

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:40.200
<v Speaker 1>versus when you're perceiving the house. The key thing is

0:24:40.240 --> 0:24:43.360
<v Speaker 1>that I'm not changing anything in the outside world. The

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:47.680
<v Speaker 1>only thing that's changing is your internal experiences. So the

0:24:47.800 --> 0:24:51.760
<v Speaker 1>question is what is the difference going on inside the brain. Now,

0:24:51.800 --> 0:24:55.520
<v Speaker 1>this sort of study has been an ongoing endeavor, but

0:24:55.720 --> 0:24:58.919
<v Speaker 1>part of the challenge with these types of experiments is

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:02.119
<v Speaker 1>that we don't have great techniques to measure the activity

0:25:02.560 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 1>in billions of individual cells. All we have are things

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:11.320
<v Speaker 1>like fMRI functional magnetic resonance imaging, which allows us to

0:25:11.400 --> 0:25:14.479
<v Speaker 1>measure great, big chunks of activity in the brain at

0:25:14.480 --> 0:25:17.879
<v Speaker 1>any moment. So we can see big blobs of activity,

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:21.440
<v Speaker 1>but we can't narrow down with a high degree of specificity.

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:25.399
<v Speaker 1>As technology gets better, we can see a pathway to

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:46.159
<v Speaker 1>eventually answering these kinds of questions with greater specificity. So

0:25:46.720 --> 0:25:50.280
<v Speaker 1>those types of experiments are ongoing and they're fascinating, but

0:25:50.359 --> 0:25:55.879
<v Speaker 1>they're only attempting to answer the easy problem of consciousness.

0:25:56.040 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 1>What am I referring to when I say the easy problem?

0:25:59.440 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 1>Some years ago, the philosopher David Chalmers divided the scientific

0:26:04.160 --> 0:26:09.080
<v Speaker 1>exploration of consciousness into two categories. There's the easy problem

0:26:09.200 --> 0:26:13.000
<v Speaker 1>and the hard problem. The easy problem is to find

0:26:13.320 --> 0:26:18.080
<v Speaker 1>neural signals that correlate with consciousness, as in this region

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:21.720
<v Speaker 1>is active when you're conscious of something. But the hard

0:26:21.800 --> 0:26:26.199
<v Speaker 1>problem of consciousness is explaining why the physical stuff of

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:31.480
<v Speaker 1>the brain gives rise to subjective experience. It's a hard

0:26:31.520 --> 0:26:35.760
<v Speaker 1>problem because it's not clear how physical stuff gives rise

0:26:35.840 --> 0:26:38.240
<v Speaker 1>to a private internal life.

0:26:39.119 --> 0:26:40.280
<v Speaker 2>That's the hard problem.

0:26:40.680 --> 0:26:43.119
<v Speaker 1>Now we don't know the answer to this, but we

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:47.119
<v Speaker 1>can make progress by being very clear about the different challenges.

0:26:48.080 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 1>One of them is something called the binding problem. For example,

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:54.760
<v Speaker 1>imagine that you look at your window and you see

0:26:54.800 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 1>a beautiful blue bird fly past. Different signals from the

0:27:00.280 --> 0:27:03.720
<v Speaker 1>bird are processed by different regions of your brain. So

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:07.520
<v Speaker 1>part of your brain is detecting the motion. This is

0:27:07.560 --> 0:27:10.879
<v Speaker 1>the dorsal stream. Part of your brain is recognizing the

0:27:10.960 --> 0:27:14.040
<v Speaker 1>shape of the bird. That's the ventral stream. Part of

0:27:14.080 --> 0:27:17.119
<v Speaker 1>your brain is registering the blue color. This is a

0:27:17.160 --> 0:27:20.760
<v Speaker 1>network called visual area four. Part of your brain is

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:23.760
<v Speaker 1>listening to the sound of the bird chirping.

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:25.520
<v Speaker 2>This is your auditory system.

0:27:26.200 --> 0:27:29.640
<v Speaker 1>The features of the bird are getting represented in totally

0:27:29.680 --> 0:27:34.800
<v Speaker 1>different territories of your brain. And yet somehow your brain

0:27:34.920 --> 0:27:38.040
<v Speaker 1>is able to put all of this information together so

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:42.360
<v Speaker 1>that you see a single unified bird. You don't see

0:27:42.400 --> 0:27:46.600
<v Speaker 1>the blue bleeding off, the moving object, and the sound

0:27:46.680 --> 0:27:50.480
<v Speaker 1>coming from somewhere else. It all seems like one thing,

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:55.040
<v Speaker 1>even though it's processed in a bunch of different parts. Now,

0:27:55.280 --> 0:27:59.399
<v Speaker 1>how do all these processing streams get combined. How do

0:27:59.440 --> 0:28:02.760
<v Speaker 1>our brains take the disparate pieces of information that we

0:28:02.920 --> 0:28:07.040
<v Speaker 1>receive from our senses and combine them into a single,

0:28:07.200 --> 0:28:11.520
<v Speaker 1>coherent experience of the world. That is the binding problem.

0:28:11.920 --> 0:28:14.720
<v Speaker 1>All these little pieces of the blue bird somehow get

0:28:15.080 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 1>bound together. What's the solution? We don't know. One theory

0:28:20.359 --> 0:28:24.359
<v Speaker 1>is that the brain uses timing information to integrate things.

0:28:24.440 --> 0:28:27.679
<v Speaker 1>This means that different pieces of information are bound together

0:28:27.840 --> 0:28:30.320
<v Speaker 1>by the fact that they're all popping off in the

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:33.680
<v Speaker 1>brain at the same time. For example, when you see

0:28:33.680 --> 0:28:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the moving blue bird, the signals representing motion and the

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:42.560
<v Speaker 1>signals representing birdness and blueness, and the signals identifying the sound,

0:28:43.160 --> 0:28:46.840
<v Speaker 1>they're all synchronized. Like imagine that you're at a stadium

0:28:46.840 --> 0:28:50.240
<v Speaker 1>full of people and you clap your hands every three seconds,

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:53.800
<v Speaker 1>and scattered in the crowd are others who clap their

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:56.400
<v Speaker 1>hands every three seconds at exactly the same time that

0:28:56.440 --> 0:28:56.720
<v Speaker 1>you do.

0:28:57.520 --> 0:28:58.880
<v Speaker 2>The idea is that you'd come.

0:28:58.760 --> 0:29:00.840
<v Speaker 1>To be able to pick out these folks out of

0:29:00.880 --> 0:29:05.120
<v Speaker 1>this giant crowd because you'd realize your synchrony with them.

0:29:05.640 --> 0:29:10.160
<v Speaker 1>And that's the general idea with this temporal binding theory.

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 1>And there are various other ways that people think about

0:29:13.760 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 1>how the binding problem gets solved. One is called global

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:21.280
<v Speaker 1>workspace theory. This was proposed by my colleague Bernard Bars,

0:29:21.600 --> 0:29:24.360
<v Speaker 1>and the idea is you've got all these disparate elements,

0:29:24.800 --> 0:29:29.040
<v Speaker 1>but things come together in what Bars calls the global workspace,

0:29:29.480 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 1>and that's when you get consciousness. In other words, consciousness

0:29:32.880 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 1>arises from the global sharing of information within the brain.

0:29:37.720 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Different brain modules are performing their specialized functions, but their

0:29:42.360 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 1>output is integrated and made available to the entire brain

0:29:47.040 --> 0:29:51.280
<v Speaker 1>via this hypothetical global workspace where the information gets combined

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:56.320
<v Speaker 1>and different processes compete for attention to enter it. When

0:29:56.360 --> 0:30:00.640
<v Speaker 1>information gets into the global workspace, it becomes available to

0:30:00.760 --> 0:30:05.000
<v Speaker 1>conscious awareness and you become aware of it. So in

0:30:05.040 --> 0:30:08.240
<v Speaker 1>this view, consciousness emerges from the integration of all these

0:30:08.240 --> 0:30:13.880
<v Speaker 1>diverse sensory and cognitive bits into a single, unified representation,

0:30:14.360 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 1>let's say, of the bluebird. Another theory proposed by my

0:30:17.800 --> 0:30:22.560
<v Speaker 1>colleague Julio Tononi is called integrated information theory. So he's

0:30:22.600 --> 0:30:27.480
<v Speaker 1>proposed a quantitative definition of consciousness. It's not just about

0:30:27.520 --> 0:30:31.280
<v Speaker 1>the pieces and parts interacting. Instead, in this framework, there

0:30:31.280 --> 0:30:35.800
<v Speaker 1>has to be a particular organization that's underlying this interaction.

0:30:36.840 --> 0:30:42.480
<v Speaker 1>So to study consciousness in the laboratory, Tononi uses transcranial

0:30:42.520 --> 0:30:46.600
<v Speaker 1>magnetic stimulation TMS to compare the activity in the brain

0:30:47.040 --> 0:30:49.880
<v Speaker 1>when it's awake and when it's in deep sleep, when

0:30:49.920 --> 0:30:54.000
<v Speaker 1>your consciousness is not there. So by introducing a burst

0:30:54.000 --> 0:30:57.480
<v Speaker 1>of electrical current into the cortex, he and his team

0:30:57.560 --> 0:31:01.000
<v Speaker 1>can then track how the activity spreads, and what he

0:31:01.080 --> 0:31:04.320
<v Speaker 1>finds is that when his subject is awake and consciously aware,

0:31:04.560 --> 0:31:08.800
<v Speaker 1>you find these long lasting ripples moving to different cortical areas,

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:14.400
<v Speaker 1>and this unmasks this widespread connectivity across the network. But

0:31:14.600 --> 0:31:18.360
<v Speaker 1>in contrast, when a person is in deep sleep, that

0:31:18.560 --> 0:31:22.600
<v Speaker 1>same pulse stimulates only a very local area and the

0:31:22.640 --> 0:31:27.320
<v Speaker 1>activity dies down quickly, So the network has lost its connectivity,

0:31:27.480 --> 0:31:29.560
<v Speaker 1>and you find the same result. When a person is

0:31:29.640 --> 0:31:33.360
<v Speaker 1>in a coma, the activity spreads very little, but as

0:31:33.400 --> 0:31:37.440
<v Speaker 1>a person emerges from a coma over weeks into consciousness,

0:31:37.720 --> 0:31:42.440
<v Speaker 1>the activity spreads more and more widely. So Toanoni believes

0:31:42.480 --> 0:31:44.960
<v Speaker 1>this is because when we are awake and conscious, there's

0:31:45.080 --> 0:31:50.760
<v Speaker 1>widespread communication between different cortical areas, but in contrast, when

0:31:50.800 --> 0:31:54.600
<v Speaker 1>you're asleep or in a coma, you lose this communication

0:31:54.680 --> 0:31:58.480
<v Speaker 1>across areas. So in his framework, Toinoni suggests that a

0:31:58.760 --> 0:32:04.680
<v Speaker 1>conscious system requires a perfect balance of enough complexity to

0:32:04.760 --> 0:32:09.560
<v Speaker 1>represent very different states. This is called differentiation. Can I

0:32:09.600 --> 0:32:11.880
<v Speaker 1>distinguish black from white, and hot from cold and so on,

0:32:12.640 --> 0:32:16.840
<v Speaker 1>and enough connectivity to have distant parts of the network

0:32:16.880 --> 0:32:20.600
<v Speaker 1>be in tight communication with each other. This is called integration.

0:32:21.520 --> 0:32:27.280
<v Speaker 1>So in this framework, the balance of differentiation and integration

0:32:28.160 --> 0:32:31.880
<v Speaker 1>can be quantified, and he proposes that only systems in

0:32:31.920 --> 0:32:36.800
<v Speaker 1>the right range experience consciousness. Now, if this theory turns

0:32:36.840 --> 0:32:39.480
<v Speaker 1>out to be correct, they can give a non invasive

0:32:39.520 --> 0:32:44.600
<v Speaker 1>assessment of the level of consciousness in coma patients. Now

0:32:44.640 --> 0:32:47.560
<v Speaker 1>it would also give us the means to tell whether

0:32:47.720 --> 0:32:51.680
<v Speaker 1>inanimate systems have consciousness. So, coming back to this question

0:32:51.760 --> 0:32:55.840
<v Speaker 1>of whether a city is conscious, this could in theory

0:32:55.880 --> 0:32:59.440
<v Speaker 1>be answered. It would depend on whether the information flow

0:32:59.680 --> 0:33:02.360
<v Speaker 1>is a ranged in just the right way with the

0:33:02.480 --> 0:33:07.760
<v Speaker 1>perfect amount of differentiation and integration. So if we can

0:33:07.800 --> 0:33:10.400
<v Speaker 1>come up with the right sort of network structure that's

0:33:10.520 --> 0:33:14.280
<v Speaker 1>needed to give rise to consciousness, we're on our way

0:33:14.600 --> 0:33:20.800
<v Speaker 1>to understanding whether consciousness could escape its biological origins. In

0:33:20.840 --> 0:33:24.640
<v Speaker 1>other words, although consciousness evolved along a particular path that

0:33:24.720 --> 0:33:28.000
<v Speaker 1>resulted in a brain, maybe it doesn't have to be

0:33:28.040 --> 0:33:31.320
<v Speaker 1>built on top of organic matter. Maybe you could build

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:35.280
<v Speaker 1>it just as easily out of silicon, assuming the interactions

0:33:35.320 --> 0:33:38.880
<v Speaker 1>are organized in the right way. So as our understanding

0:33:38.880 --> 0:33:42.600
<v Speaker 1>of the brain continues to evolve, we may be eventually

0:33:42.640 --> 0:33:46.040
<v Speaker 1>able to answer the question of whether a city is

0:33:46.160 --> 0:33:50.280
<v Speaker 1>conscious or a set of tinker toys, or eventually AI

0:33:51.520 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 1>and this all comes down to the philosophical idea of materialism.

0:33:56.040 --> 0:33:58.560
<v Speaker 1>This is the notion that you can build consciousness out

0:33:58.560 --> 0:34:02.400
<v Speaker 1>of material stuff, whether that's beer cans and tennis balls,

0:34:02.480 --> 0:34:06.880
<v Speaker 1>or tinker toys or computers. The magic of conscious experience

0:34:07.000 --> 0:34:11.480
<v Speaker 1>emerges from the physical pieces and parts arranged in exactly

0:34:11.520 --> 0:34:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the right way. And if we can figure out that

0:34:14.520 --> 0:34:17.239
<v Speaker 1>right way, then we should be able to build it.

0:34:17.640 --> 0:34:20.879
<v Speaker 1>But I want to mention some important caveats. The main

0:34:20.920 --> 0:34:24.160
<v Speaker 1>one is that it's just a hypothesis that we can

0:34:24.200 --> 0:34:27.120
<v Speaker 1>build consciousness out of physical stuff. It always needs to

0:34:27.120 --> 0:34:29.640
<v Speaker 1>be kept in mind. Then our science is still quite young,

0:34:29.719 --> 0:34:32.480
<v Speaker 1>and there may be other things that were simply not

0:34:32.719 --> 0:34:36.239
<v Speaker 1>aware of. There's a hypothetical that I shared in my

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:46.840
<v Speaker 1>book Incognito to demonstrate this idea. Imagine that somebody living

0:34:46.960 --> 0:34:50.400
<v Speaker 1>in a primitive tribe out in the desert somewhere finds

0:34:50.400 --> 0:34:53.800
<v Speaker 1>a radio in the sand, and he's never seen anything

0:34:53.920 --> 0:34:56.799
<v Speaker 1>like this, and so he picks it up and examines it,

0:34:56.840 --> 0:34:59.200
<v Speaker 1>and he notices there's a knob on it, and so

0:34:59.280 --> 0:35:01.200
<v Speaker 1>he sort of touched and playing with that, and he

0:35:01.320 --> 0:35:05.360
<v Speaker 1>realizes that if he turns the knob that suddenly voices

0:35:05.480 --> 0:35:09.319
<v Speaker 1>emerged from the box, and so he says, Okay, I'm

0:35:09.320 --> 0:35:12.360
<v Speaker 1>going to figure out how this box is producing the noise.

0:35:12.800 --> 0:35:14.760
<v Speaker 1>And he goes through a lot of trial and error,

0:35:14.960 --> 0:35:16.719
<v Speaker 1>and he figures out that he can take off the

0:35:16.800 --> 0:35:19.439
<v Speaker 1>back of the radio and there's these wires in there,

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:23.719
<v Speaker 1>and with this nest of wires, he does experiments and

0:35:23.760 --> 0:35:25.680
<v Speaker 1>he figures out that if you pull out this wire

0:35:25.719 --> 0:35:29.640
<v Speaker 1>temporarily the voices get garbled, and if you pull out

0:35:29.640 --> 0:35:32.839
<v Speaker 1>this wire over here, the voices stop entirely, and so on.

0:35:33.560 --> 0:35:38.040
<v Speaker 1>So this person becomes a radio materialist. What he would

0:35:38.080 --> 0:35:40.759
<v Speaker 1>do is he'd conclude that if you put together this

0:35:40.880 --> 0:35:42.759
<v Speaker 1>nest of wires in just the right way, with the

0:35:42.840 --> 0:35:46.920
<v Speaker 1>right structure, the whole thing becomes alive and talks to you.

0:35:47.440 --> 0:35:50.120
<v Speaker 2>But he has no idea that.

0:35:50.000 --> 0:35:55.080
<v Speaker 1>There are radio towers that are beaming electromagnetic radiation from

0:35:55.160 --> 0:35:58.160
<v Speaker 1>distant cities. It would never strike him that any of

0:35:58.200 --> 0:36:00.480
<v Speaker 1>that is going on, because that's not part of it world.

0:36:01.000 --> 0:36:03.799
<v Speaker 1>So he would come to the erroneous conclusion that if

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:06.600
<v Speaker 1>you put together the wires in the right way, they

0:36:06.760 --> 0:36:10.279
<v Speaker 1>generate voices. And so my point in bringing up this

0:36:10.320 --> 0:36:12.680
<v Speaker 1>analogy is not to say that our consciousness is getting

0:36:12.719 --> 0:36:15.400
<v Speaker 1>beamed in from somewhere else. But it is to say

0:36:15.880 --> 0:36:19.240
<v Speaker 1>it is certainly possible that we're missing big, giant pieces

0:36:19.280 --> 0:36:21.879
<v Speaker 1>of the puzzle, and that there's something that for us

0:36:21.920 --> 0:36:24.600
<v Speaker 1>would be the equivalent of not realizing that there's a

0:36:25.000 --> 0:36:28.560
<v Speaker 1>giant tower beaming signals to the radio. So I began

0:36:28.640 --> 0:36:30.600
<v Speaker 1>by pointing out that all the data we have in

0:36:30.640 --> 0:36:34.720
<v Speaker 1>neuroscience says that the physical integrity of the brain needs

0:36:34.760 --> 0:36:36.960
<v Speaker 1>to be there to have conscious experience, and if you

0:36:37.080 --> 0:36:40.520
<v Speaker 1>damage your brain, you change consciousness. But the radio example

0:36:40.560 --> 0:36:43.239
<v Speaker 1>is just meant to demonstrate that there still may be

0:36:43.600 --> 0:36:46.800
<v Speaker 1>lots of unknowns, And a specific example of an unknown

0:36:46.920 --> 0:36:50.560
<v Speaker 1>is this, does consciousness arise from hooking things up in

0:36:50.600 --> 0:36:53.520
<v Speaker 1>the right way or does it instead depend on some

0:36:53.800 --> 0:36:58.040
<v Speaker 1>special property of biological cells? In other words, is there

0:36:58.239 --> 0:37:01.680
<v Speaker 1>something special about our biology and the material that makes

0:37:01.719 --> 0:37:06.120
<v Speaker 1>up our brain that allows us to be conscious? For example,

0:37:06.200 --> 0:37:08.640
<v Speaker 1>one question that people have been asking is whether there

0:37:08.719 --> 0:37:14.040
<v Speaker 1>are quantum mechanical effects that happen in biological cells. Quantum

0:37:14.080 --> 0:37:17.280
<v Speaker 1>mechanics is a branch of physics. It's considered the best

0:37:17.320 --> 0:37:20.799
<v Speaker 1>scientific theory that we have because it predicts experiments out

0:37:20.840 --> 0:37:24.760
<v Speaker 1>to fourteen decimal places. But it's very counterintuitive. It's difficult

0:37:24.800 --> 0:37:28.080
<v Speaker 1>to understand because there are all kinds of very weird

0:37:28.120 --> 0:37:31.640
<v Speaker 1>effects that happen at the level of atoms. I'll go

0:37:31.680 --> 0:37:34.960
<v Speaker 1>into detail on that another episode, but for now, I'll

0:37:35.000 --> 0:37:37.440
<v Speaker 1>just say that some people suggest that some of the

0:37:37.480 --> 0:37:41.040
<v Speaker 1>spooky properties of quantum mechanics are just the kind of

0:37:41.080 --> 0:37:45.040
<v Speaker 1>thing we need to explain the mysteries of consciousness. Now,

0:37:45.120 --> 0:37:48.840
<v Speaker 1>other people have suggested that you can't have quantum mechanical

0:37:48.920 --> 0:37:52.640
<v Speaker 1>interactions happening in the brain because of the hot temperature,

0:37:52.920 --> 0:37:56.399
<v Speaker 1>and that may be true, but quantum effects are more

0:37:56.440 --> 0:38:00.000
<v Speaker 1>and more commonly being discovered in biology, so it's prematu

0:38:00.080 --> 0:38:02.840
<v Speaker 1>sure to rule it out entirely. For example, it was

0:38:02.840 --> 0:38:06.759
<v Speaker 1>discovered in recent years that photosynthesis in plants is a

0:38:06.840 --> 0:38:10.680
<v Speaker 1>quantum mechanical effect, So there are quantum mechanical effects that

0:38:10.760 --> 0:38:14.279
<v Speaker 1>happen at this temperature and this level. So I'm not

0:38:14.280 --> 0:38:17.160
<v Speaker 1>asserting there definitely are quantum effects in the human brain,

0:38:17.560 --> 0:38:21.239
<v Speaker 1>but that's one type of possibility that people consider for

0:38:21.360 --> 0:38:24.279
<v Speaker 1>how we might get consciousness in a human brain, but

0:38:24.400 --> 0:38:28.280
<v Speaker 1>perhaps we wouldn't in a classical computer. Just for completeness,

0:38:28.320 --> 0:38:31.000
<v Speaker 1>I'll mention one other theory that consciousness is like a

0:38:31.400 --> 0:38:35.359
<v Speaker 1>fifth force in physics. This theory is called pan psychism,

0:38:35.800 --> 0:38:39.040
<v Speaker 1>and the idea is that consciousness is a property that's

0:38:39.120 --> 0:38:40.799
<v Speaker 1>present in all physical matter.

0:38:40.840 --> 0:38:42.600
<v Speaker 2>It's a property of atoms, and.

0:38:42.560 --> 0:38:45.200
<v Speaker 1>When you get a bunch of atoms and cells together

0:38:45.280 --> 0:38:48.960
<v Speaker 1>and you collect enough of the material of consciousness, that's

0:38:49.000 --> 0:38:53.200
<v Speaker 1>when consciousness emerges. The theory suggests that the details of

0:38:53.239 --> 0:38:56.160
<v Speaker 1>the system don't really matter. It's all about getting enough

0:38:56.280 --> 0:38:59.760
<v Speaker 1>of the material of consciousness together. Now I'm not suggesting

0:38:59.760 --> 0:39:03.400
<v Speaker 1>pan psychism is true, but I'm mentioning this for completeness

0:39:03.680 --> 0:39:06.560
<v Speaker 1>to illustrate that our science is quite young and we

0:39:06.640 --> 0:39:09.320
<v Speaker 1>have no idea what the answer is, so we certainly

0:39:09.360 --> 0:39:12.600
<v Speaker 1>can't rule things out prematurely. Okay, So we've talked about

0:39:12.600 --> 0:39:16.680
<v Speaker 1>the mystery of consciousness and fundamentally how little we still

0:39:16.680 --> 0:39:19.560
<v Speaker 1>know about it. And there's more, which is that to

0:39:19.640 --> 0:39:23.080
<v Speaker 1>make progress towards the solution, we first need to get

0:39:23.120 --> 0:39:27.960
<v Speaker 1>straight what phenomenon we're trying to explain. Consciousness is probably

0:39:27.960 --> 0:39:30.960
<v Speaker 1>not like a light bulb, where it's either on or off.

0:39:31.000 --> 0:39:34.680
<v Speaker 1>It may be that consciousness varies a lot between one

0:39:34.719 --> 0:39:38.600
<v Speaker 1>person and another, between one species and another, and.

0:39:38.680 --> 0:39:41.080
<v Speaker 2>Also within you over time.

0:39:42.160 --> 0:39:46.120
<v Speaker 1>So consciousness is a diverse phenomenon and we still haven't

0:39:46.200 --> 0:39:50.560
<v Speaker 1>yet figured out how the physical equals the mental. The

0:39:50.600 --> 0:39:53.480
<v Speaker 1>ideas that we've looked at today start to help us

0:39:53.560 --> 0:39:56.160
<v Speaker 1>understand some of the structure that might have to be

0:39:56.200 --> 0:39:59.319
<v Speaker 1>in place for consciousness to emerge, but there are many

0:39:59.400 --> 0:40:02.839
<v Speaker 1>questions to be answered. So for the next episode, I'm

0:40:02.880 --> 0:40:05.560
<v Speaker 1>going to dive a little deeper into one aspect of this.

0:40:06.080 --> 0:40:08.880
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask if it would be possible to

0:40:09.160 --> 0:40:13.719
<v Speaker 1>upload our consciousness from our heads onto another substrate like silicon.

0:40:14.239 --> 0:40:19.239
<v Speaker 1>Is it possible to transfer our consciousness to someone else

0:40:19.400 --> 0:40:22.080
<v Speaker 1>or something else? And if so, could that be a

0:40:22.120 --> 0:40:29.480
<v Speaker 1>solution to the problem of mortality. To find out more

0:40:29.520 --> 0:40:32.239
<v Speaker 1>and to find further readings on this topic, head to

0:40:32.480 --> 0:40:36.000
<v Speaker 1>eagleman dot com slash podcast, and if you have any

0:40:36.080 --> 0:40:39.680
<v Speaker 1>questions or discussions, please send an email to podcast at

0:40:39.760 --> 0:40:43.120
<v Speaker 1>eagleman dot com. You can also watch full episodes of

0:40:43.160 --> 0:40:47.560
<v Speaker 1>Inner Cosmos on YouTube. Subscribe to inner cosmospods so you

0:40:47.600 --> 0:40:51.120
<v Speaker 1>can follow along each week with new updates until next time.

0:40:51.480 --> 0:41:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm David Eagleman, and this is Inner Cosmos.