WEBVTT - Michael Lewis on Freakonomics Radio

0:00:15.316 --> 0:00:15.796
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin.

0:00:20.516 --> 0:00:23.356
<v Speaker 2>Hey, there against the Rules listeners. I am Stephen Dubner

0:00:23.396 --> 0:00:26.636
<v Speaker 2>and I host Freakonomics Radio, the podcast that explores the

0:00:26.716 --> 0:00:30.036
<v Speaker 2>hidden side of everything. A few months ago, I sat

0:00:30.076 --> 0:00:33.116
<v Speaker 2>down with Michael Lewis to talk about his latest book,

0:00:33.236 --> 0:00:36.316
<v Speaker 2>Going Infinite, The Rise and Fall of a New Tycoon.

0:00:36.796 --> 0:00:40.436
<v Speaker 2>We talked about the story that's in the book, Sam Bankman, Freed,

0:00:40.556 --> 0:00:44.556
<v Speaker 2>and FTX, as well as people's reactions to the book.

0:00:44.796 --> 0:00:47.596
<v Speaker 2>Our episode is called why Are People So Mad At

0:00:47.836 --> 0:00:51.156
<v Speaker 2>Michael Lewis, So we wanted to share this episode with you.

0:00:51.596 --> 0:01:03.316
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening. I feel like, as much as Sam

0:01:03.356 --> 0:01:06.436
<v Speaker 2>Bankman Freed has been in the center of a vortex,

0:01:07.516 --> 0:01:09.796
<v Speaker 2>that you're close to the senders. Oh can you just

0:01:09.836 --> 0:01:12.196
<v Speaker 2>tell me what your life has been like the past

0:01:12.196 --> 0:01:13.076
<v Speaker 2>couple months?

0:01:13.916 --> 0:01:18.236
<v Speaker 1>Surprisingly controversial, This material just landed in my lap, and

0:01:18.236 --> 0:01:19.836
<v Speaker 1>I really did think when I was writing it, I

0:01:19.916 --> 0:01:21.716
<v Speaker 1>never had more fun writing a book than I had

0:01:21.756 --> 0:01:23.956
<v Speaker 1>writing this one. I knew that some people were going

0:01:24.036 --> 0:01:25.676
<v Speaker 1>to be a little bit upset with the book, but

0:01:25.756 --> 0:01:28.116
<v Speaker 1>I thought basically it was going to be taken as

0:01:28.116 --> 0:01:29.916
<v Speaker 1>a thrill ride and it would just be a fun

0:01:29.996 --> 0:01:34.116
<v Speaker 1>read for everybody. What I wasn't prepared for was just

0:01:34.236 --> 0:01:36.036
<v Speaker 1>the sheer volume of the anger.

0:01:39.316 --> 0:01:42.596
<v Speaker 2>Michael Lewis is one of the most popular nonfiction authors

0:01:42.716 --> 0:01:46.596
<v Speaker 2>on the planet. His books include Liar's Poker, Moneyball, The

0:01:46.596 --> 0:01:50.876
<v Speaker 2>Big Short, Flash Boys, and Now Going Infinite. The Rise

0:01:50.956 --> 0:01:54.356
<v Speaker 2>and Fall of a New Tycoon. The tycoon in question

0:01:54.516 --> 0:01:59.956
<v Speaker 2>is Sam Bankman Freed, who was briefly everyone's favorite cryptocurrency billionaire,

0:02:00.636 --> 0:02:03.596
<v Speaker 2>and Michael Lewis rode shotgun for some of the rise

0:02:04.196 --> 0:02:09.316
<v Speaker 2>and most of the fall. The fall was fast and hard.

0:02:09.396 --> 0:02:12.556
<v Speaker 2>Was recently convicted of seven counts of fraud and conspiracy

0:02:12.596 --> 0:02:15.996
<v Speaker 2>in a New York courtroom. The controversy comes from people

0:02:15.996 --> 0:02:19.436
<v Speaker 2>who argue that Michael Lewis went soft on Bankman Freed

0:02:19.476 --> 0:02:22.916
<v Speaker 2>instead of lasting him as a crook and a cheat.

0:02:23.556 --> 0:02:26.036
<v Speaker 2>Here is how a New York Times review put it.

0:02:26.676 --> 0:02:29.676
<v Speaker 2>Lewis had, in the months leading up to the disaster,

0:02:29.996 --> 0:02:33.436
<v Speaker 2>a front row seat from which he could apparently see nothing.

0:02:36.396 --> 0:02:40.036
<v Speaker 1>It troubles me that people want to put Sam Bankman

0:02:40.076 --> 0:02:41.876
<v Speaker 1>Freed into a simple box and put him on a

0:02:41.916 --> 0:02:43.676
<v Speaker 1>shelf and not think too much more about this.

0:02:44.236 --> 0:02:45.196
<v Speaker 2>Why it troubles you?

0:02:45.236 --> 0:02:48.516
<v Speaker 1>Why Because he's so much more and this is so

0:02:48.636 --> 0:02:50.116
<v Speaker 1>much more interesting than that.

0:02:50.716 --> 0:02:54.996
<v Speaker 2>Today on Freakonomics Radio. Interesting is just the start of it.

0:02:55.436 --> 0:02:59.396
<v Speaker 2>Sam Bankman Freed bared all to Michael Lewis, and now

0:02:59.596 --> 0:03:02.356
<v Speaker 2>Michael Lewis bears all for us.

0:03:02.956 --> 0:03:05.676
<v Speaker 1>It was an unguarded ness. They was shocking.

0:03:06.236 --> 0:03:09.116
<v Speaker 2>It's the latest installment of the Freakonomics Radio book Club

0:03:09.396 --> 0:03:19.436
<v Speaker 2>and begins right now.

0:03:23.916 --> 0:03:27.996
<v Speaker 3>This is Freakonomics Radio, the podcast that explores the hidden

0:03:28.076 --> 0:03:31.636
<v Speaker 3>side of everything, with your host Stephen Dubner.

0:03:38.396 --> 0:03:41.516
<v Speaker 2>Here's how Michael Lewis begins his new book, Going Infinite.

0:03:41.716 --> 0:03:44.996
<v Speaker 2>This is from the audio version, with Lewis himself reading.

0:03:47.556 --> 0:03:49.636
<v Speaker 1>I first heard about Sam Bankman Freed at the end

0:03:49.716 --> 0:03:52.916
<v Speaker 1>of twenty twenty one from a friend who oddly enough

0:03:52.956 --> 0:03:54.956
<v Speaker 1>wanted me to help him figure out who he was.

0:03:55.676 --> 0:03:57.556
<v Speaker 1>My friend was about to close a deal with Sam

0:03:57.596 --> 0:04:00.116
<v Speaker 1>that would bind their fates through an exchange of shares

0:04:00.156 --> 0:04:03.076
<v Speaker 1>in each other's companies worth hundreds of millions of dollars.

0:04:03.956 --> 0:04:05.756
<v Speaker 1>My friend asked me if I could meet with Sam

0:04:05.796 --> 0:04:08.876
<v Speaker 1>and report back whatever I made of him. A few

0:04:08.876 --> 0:04:12.516
<v Speaker 1>weeks Sam was on my front porch in Berkeley, California.

0:04:12.996 --> 0:04:16.196
<v Speaker 1>He'd emerged from an uber in cargo shorts, a T

0:04:16.356 --> 0:04:19.916
<v Speaker 1>shirt limp white socks and ratty new Balance sneakers, which

0:04:19.996 --> 0:04:22.436
<v Speaker 1>I soon learned were basically the only clothes he owned.

0:04:23.356 --> 0:04:25.356
<v Speaker 1>We went for a walk, the only time in the

0:04:25.396 --> 0:04:27.516
<v Speaker 1>next two years I would ever see this person who

0:04:27.556 --> 0:04:30.876
<v Speaker 1>was always dressed for a hike actually go for one.

0:04:31.156 --> 0:04:33.956
<v Speaker 1>During our walk, I prodded him with questions, but after

0:04:33.996 --> 0:04:36.756
<v Speaker 1>a while I was mostly just listening. The stuff he

0:04:36.836 --> 0:04:38.916
<v Speaker 1>was telling me, all of which I should say here

0:04:39.036 --> 0:04:43.156
<v Speaker 1>turned out to be true, was incredible. By the end

0:04:43.156 --> 0:04:45.676
<v Speaker 1>of this walk, I was totally sold. I called my

0:04:45.716 --> 0:04:48.436
<v Speaker 1>friend and said something like, go for it, swap shares

0:04:48.476 --> 0:04:51.396
<v Speaker 1>with Sam Bankman Freed, do whatever he wants to do.

0:04:51.876 --> 0:04:53.516
<v Speaker 1>What could possibly go wrong?

0:04:55.356 --> 0:04:57.956
<v Speaker 2>As we now know, a lot of things went wrong.

0:04:58.476 --> 0:05:02.756
<v Speaker 2>Bankman Freed started and ran two firms, a cryptocurrency trading

0:05:02.796 --> 0:05:07.276
<v Speaker 2>firm called Alameter Research and a crypto exchange based in

0:05:07.316 --> 0:05:11.876
<v Speaker 2>the Bahamas called FTX. When FTX collapsed in twenty twenty two,

0:05:12.076 --> 0:05:15.596
<v Speaker 2>Bankman Freed was charged with shuffling money between the two

0:05:15.756 --> 0:05:20.196
<v Speaker 2>firms and spending billions of dollars of customers deposits on

0:05:20.436 --> 0:05:26.636
<v Speaker 2>political contributions, celebrity marketing, and venture capital investments. He also

0:05:26.716 --> 0:05:29.996
<v Speaker 2>directed a lot of money toward the effective altruism movement.

0:05:30.716 --> 0:05:33.676
<v Speaker 2>The thing is, as you read Michael Lewis's book, it's

0:05:33.716 --> 0:05:37.716
<v Speaker 2>hard to separate Bankman Freed's illegal behaviors from the ones

0:05:37.716 --> 0:05:42.116
<v Speaker 2>that were just sloppy or weird. The book's publication was

0:05:42.156 --> 0:05:45.356
<v Speaker 2>timed to coincide with the first day of the Bankman

0:05:45.396 --> 0:05:48.276
<v Speaker 2>Freed trial, so heading into the trial, a lot of

0:05:48.356 --> 0:05:50.596
<v Speaker 2>people were asking Lewis what he thought.

0:05:50.996 --> 0:05:53.556
<v Speaker 1>I didn't actually say I don't think he did anything illegal,

0:05:53.676 --> 0:05:56.836
<v Speaker 1>or I'm not sure what I said was I don't

0:05:56.876 --> 0:05:59.276
<v Speaker 1>want to say, because I wanted to just tell the

0:05:59.316 --> 0:06:01.756
<v Speaker 1>story and let the reader decide what they think. The

0:06:01.836 --> 0:06:04.956
<v Speaker 1>book is filled with stuff that is essentially lawbreaking, but

0:06:04.996 --> 0:06:06.996
<v Speaker 1>I'm just telling it rather than telling you he broke

0:06:07.036 --> 0:06:07.396
<v Speaker 1>the law.

0:06:07.636 --> 0:06:10.516
<v Speaker 2>So do you think maybe that's why you've been somewhat

0:06:10.516 --> 0:06:12.796
<v Speaker 2>punished because you didn't act as judge and jury in

0:06:12.836 --> 0:06:13.236
<v Speaker 2>the book.

0:06:13.716 --> 0:06:17.476
<v Speaker 1>Yes, totally. But what I did, and I did very intentionally,

0:06:17.676 --> 0:06:20.836
<v Speaker 1>was I let the characters in the book investigate him

0:06:21.036 --> 0:06:23.556
<v Speaker 1>rather than me. I mean it was made to order

0:06:23.596 --> 0:06:27.636
<v Speaker 1>for narrative nonfiction. I had the chief operating officer of

0:06:27.676 --> 0:06:30.996
<v Speaker 1>the company, who'd been from the beginning, who realizes when

0:06:30.996 --> 0:06:33.996
<v Speaker 1>it all blows up. She doesn't know how this company operated,

0:06:34.196 --> 0:06:37.156
<v Speaker 1>and she wants to lynch him like she's helping the prosecutor.

0:06:37.196 --> 0:06:39.956
<v Speaker 1>She's trying to find evidence. So I just let her

0:06:39.996 --> 0:06:40.276
<v Speaker 1>do it.

0:06:40.636 --> 0:06:45.876
<v Speaker 2>So your books are generally very well reviewed among writers.

0:06:46.436 --> 0:06:49.676
<v Speaker 2>You're thought of as a writer's writer, so I'm not

0:06:49.836 --> 0:06:54.076
<v Speaker 2>used to seeing you get this kind of attention. Bad reviews,

0:06:54.356 --> 0:06:57.076
<v Speaker 2>features that call you into question. I'll read you a

0:06:57.116 --> 0:07:01.356
<v Speaker 2>couple of headlines from the Washington Post. Michael Lewis goes

0:07:01.436 --> 0:07:06.676
<v Speaker 2>close on Sam Bankman Freed, maybe too close. La Times.

0:07:06.716 --> 0:07:08.756
<v Speaker 2>What you won't learn from Michael Lewis's book on the

0:07:08.876 --> 0:07:13.156
<v Speaker 2>ft could fill another book another La Times piece in

0:07:13.596 --> 0:07:16.676
<v Speaker 2>Michael Lewis, Sam Bankman Fried found his last and most

0:07:16.756 --> 0:07:22.116
<v Speaker 2>willing victim. So the through line here is that critics

0:07:22.156 --> 0:07:25.636
<v Speaker 2>feel you still treat him too much like a hero

0:07:26.356 --> 0:07:30.076
<v Speaker 2>and at least like someone to be sympathized with.

0:07:30.676 --> 0:07:33.316
<v Speaker 1>Well, can I push back on this first? They are

0:07:33.396 --> 0:07:37.356
<v Speaker 1>also reviews by better writers in The New Yorker, in

0:07:37.436 --> 0:07:39.996
<v Speaker 1>the London Review of Books, in The Times Literary Supplement

0:07:40.156 --> 0:07:43.236
<v Speaker 1>that are very positive. There was no consensus in the reviews,

0:07:43.756 --> 0:07:48.196
<v Speaker 1>but the objections here were bewildering to me because the

0:07:48.236 --> 0:07:50.796
<v Speaker 1>idea that you're not supposed to get to know your subject.

0:07:51.276 --> 0:07:53.796
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there are people who have been presenting themselves

0:07:53.836 --> 0:07:56.196
<v Speaker 1>as authorities on Sam Bankman Freed, who's never met him.

0:07:56.676 --> 0:07:58.916
<v Speaker 1>It's really useful to get to know someone if you're

0:07:58.916 --> 0:08:01.476
<v Speaker 1>going to write about them. The idea that I was

0:08:01.556 --> 0:08:05.316
<v Speaker 1>somehow blinded to what he had done is preposterous. Because

0:08:05.316 --> 0:08:08.396
<v Speaker 1>I didn't start writing this thing until January.

0:08:07.996 --> 0:08:08.756
<v Speaker 2>Of the year.

0:08:09.116 --> 0:08:12.396
<v Speaker 1>You could see what it does. I think that people

0:08:12.436 --> 0:08:17.316
<v Speaker 1>are confusing painting him as he actually is was sympathizing

0:08:17.356 --> 0:08:20.676
<v Speaker 1>with him. Is it surprising that if you paint him

0:08:20.676 --> 0:08:25.036
<v Speaker 1>as he actually is you feel yourself disturbingly drawn to him?

0:08:25.596 --> 0:08:28.396
<v Speaker 1>Because this was the problem in the first place. This

0:08:28.476 --> 0:08:30.436
<v Speaker 1>is what led to the whole problem. If you don't

0:08:30.436 --> 0:08:32.516
<v Speaker 1>feel some attraction him, at least in the beginning of

0:08:32.556 --> 0:08:35.476
<v Speaker 1>the book, you're completely missing why this happened in the

0:08:35.476 --> 0:08:38.076
<v Speaker 1>first place. So to start out as, oh, this guy's

0:08:38.116 --> 0:08:39.996
<v Speaker 1>evil and everybody saw it and I saw it first,

0:08:39.996 --> 0:08:44.076
<v Speaker 1>it's false. Second, you miss the wonder of the story.

0:08:46.036 --> 0:08:49.316
<v Speaker 2>The story really begins in twenty seventeen, when Bankman Freed

0:08:49.396 --> 0:08:52.476
<v Speaker 2>quit his job at the trading firm Jane Street Capital

0:08:52.876 --> 0:08:56.716
<v Speaker 2>to start his own crypto trading firm, Alameda Research. As

0:08:56.836 --> 0:09:01.756
<v Speaker 2>Lewis's book makes clear, Alameda was from the beginning a mess.

0:09:02.356 --> 0:09:05.756
<v Speaker 2>Bankman Freed was very good at finding clever ways to

0:09:05.836 --> 0:09:09.036
<v Speaker 2>make money by trading cryptocurrencies at a time when most

0:09:09.196 --> 0:09:13.516
<v Speaker 2>mainstream trading firm still avoided crypto. But as a CEO

0:09:13.956 --> 0:09:19.596
<v Speaker 2>he was terrible, unfocused, unreliable, and totally uninterested in any

0:09:19.676 --> 0:09:23.076
<v Speaker 2>of the normal processes required to run a company or

0:09:23.116 --> 0:09:24.596
<v Speaker 2>to manage employees.

0:09:25.196 --> 0:09:27.876
<v Speaker 1>And after about three months, half of them hated Sam

0:09:27.916 --> 0:09:29.596
<v Speaker 1>and half of them thought he was a criminal.

0:09:30.116 --> 0:09:33.996
<v Speaker 2>Then he created the cryptocurrency trading platform FTX and became

0:09:34.196 --> 0:09:38.956
<v Speaker 2>CEO of it. He timed the crypto wave perfectly. By

0:09:39.036 --> 0:09:43.076
<v Speaker 2>twenty twenty one, Forbes put Sam Bankminfried's wealth at twenty

0:09:43.116 --> 0:09:45.876
<v Speaker 2>two and a half billion dollars, making him the world's

0:09:45.956 --> 0:09:49.556
<v Speaker 2>richest person under thirty At FTX, he was still a

0:09:49.636 --> 0:09:52.276
<v Speaker 2>bad CEO, but there was more to it than that.

0:09:53.116 --> 0:09:56.516
<v Speaker 1>What he did is he misappropriated funds. He told people

0:09:56.556 --> 0:09:58.636
<v Speaker 1>that their money was safe in one place, and he

0:09:58.716 --> 0:10:01.716
<v Speaker 1>was actually he was taking big gambles with it in

0:10:01.756 --> 0:10:04.436
<v Speaker 1>another place. What's odd about these gambles is that some

0:10:04.516 --> 0:10:07.716
<v Speaker 1>of them seemed to have worked out pretty well. Look,

0:10:07.956 --> 0:10:09.516
<v Speaker 1>I'm not a lawyer, and I was never all that

0:10:09.556 --> 0:10:11.716
<v Speaker 1>interested in the legal questions. I was more interested in

0:10:11.756 --> 0:10:16.396
<v Speaker 1>the moral questions. And he clearly, in my story, right

0:10:16.436 --> 0:10:19.876
<v Speaker 1>from the beginning, did something that was illegal. He didn't

0:10:19.916 --> 0:10:22.956
<v Speaker 1>ever separate the funds like he had his hedge fund,

0:10:23.036 --> 0:10:25.956
<v Speaker 1>alometor research or quant fund or whatever you want to

0:10:25.996 --> 0:10:29.476
<v Speaker 1>call it, and his exchange. And the way people got

0:10:29.516 --> 0:10:31.596
<v Speaker 1>their dollars onto the exchange was by sending it to

0:10:31.596 --> 0:10:33.516
<v Speaker 1>his quand fund, and it never left the Quand fund.

0:10:33.876 --> 0:10:37.276
<v Speaker 1>So he was essentially extending himself a free loan, using

0:10:37.276 --> 0:10:38.156
<v Speaker 1>customer to posits.

0:10:38.236 --> 0:10:41.276
<v Speaker 2>Right from the beginning, when you started hanging out with Sam,

0:10:41.356 --> 0:10:43.796
<v Speaker 2>he was already well known in some circles, maybe not

0:10:43.956 --> 0:10:48.796
<v Speaker 2>famous quite. And then your relationship extended, including to the

0:10:48.956 --> 0:10:51.796
<v Speaker 2>collapse of FTX, up to the trial and so on.

0:10:52.236 --> 0:10:54.316
<v Speaker 2>First of all, I want to hear about how the

0:10:54.356 --> 0:10:57.356
<v Speaker 2>reporting happened. I mean, we know a lot about you

0:10:57.436 --> 0:11:00.356
<v Speaker 2>as a reporter. You really believe in the old school

0:11:00.396 --> 0:11:03.036
<v Speaker 2>idea of just hanging out with a notebook. So I

0:11:03.076 --> 0:11:05.476
<v Speaker 2>want to hear about the relationship how it worked, and

0:11:05.596 --> 0:11:09.756
<v Speaker 2>especially how the relationship changed between you and him after

0:11:09.956 --> 0:11:10.636
<v Speaker 2>the collapse.

0:11:11.196 --> 0:11:14.396
<v Speaker 1>I didn't start out thinking I had a book or

0:11:14.476 --> 0:11:18.076
<v Speaker 1>what the book was. I start out thinking, this character

0:11:18.276 --> 0:11:22.116
<v Speaker 1>is really interesting and the situation's bizarre. He's gone from

0:11:22.236 --> 0:11:24.676
<v Speaker 1>zero to having twenty two billion dollars in eighteen months,

0:11:24.716 --> 0:11:27.316
<v Speaker 1>and the world is organizing itself around this pile of money.

0:11:27.556 --> 0:11:29.956
<v Speaker 1>I just want to watch. So that's how it starts.

0:11:29.956 --> 0:11:31.836
<v Speaker 1>I say to him, I just want to watch. I

0:11:31.836 --> 0:11:35.156
<v Speaker 1>don't know what there is here, and he says, fine,

0:11:35.436 --> 0:11:37.476
<v Speaker 1>come on down to Bahamas and here are the keys.

0:11:38.076 --> 0:11:41.116
<v Speaker 1>And so I spend a year doing that. At no

0:11:41.276 --> 0:11:44.756
<v Speaker 1>point did Sam becinfree ask me what I was doing.

0:11:45.276 --> 0:11:47.956
<v Speaker 1>At no point did he say I can't answer that question,

0:11:48.156 --> 0:11:51.676
<v Speaker 1>or why are you asking that question. It was an unguardedness.

0:11:52.316 --> 0:11:55.516
<v Speaker 1>They were shocking, and it wasn't just with me. I

0:11:55.556 --> 0:11:58.396
<v Speaker 1>think other reporters found that when they pushed a little bit,

0:11:58.476 --> 0:11:59.916
<v Speaker 1>doors just opened. There.

0:12:00.236 --> 0:12:04.556
<v Speaker 2>Some of the scenes in the book aren't just comically bizarre,

0:12:04.796 --> 0:12:07.356
<v Speaker 2>like when he's on a zoom call with Anna wind

0:12:07.356 --> 0:12:11.596
<v Speaker 2>Tour from Vogue magazine, who wants him to participate in

0:12:11.756 --> 0:12:16.356
<v Speaker 2>maybe fund the mech Gala the very high profile fashion

0:12:16.396 --> 0:12:19.716
<v Speaker 2>event at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York, YEP.

0:12:20.076 --> 0:12:22.156
<v Speaker 2>In that instance, where are you Are you in the

0:12:22.236 --> 0:12:23.516
<v Speaker 2>room with him when he's on that call?

0:12:23.756 --> 0:12:24.036
<v Speaker 1>Yes?

0:12:24.596 --> 0:12:25.236
<v Speaker 2>Where is that?

0:12:25.396 --> 0:12:28.276
<v Speaker 1>It's in the Beverly Hills Hilton Hotel.

0:12:28.236 --> 0:12:29.076
<v Speaker 2>And he's in La.

0:12:29.196 --> 0:12:32.116
<v Speaker 1>Why he's in La because he's gone to the super Bowl.

0:12:32.516 --> 0:12:34.076
<v Speaker 1>It was the day he was leaving to go back

0:12:34.076 --> 0:12:36.116
<v Speaker 1>to the Bahamas, and I was going to join him.

0:12:36.356 --> 0:12:37.996
<v Speaker 1>He says, I got a call. And I said who

0:12:38.076 --> 0:12:39.516
<v Speaker 1>you got a call with? He says, I don't know.

0:12:39.916 --> 0:12:42.836
<v Speaker 1>Anna went tour And I said, oh really, And so

0:12:42.916 --> 0:12:45.076
<v Speaker 1>I sat off to one side and it was just

0:12:45.276 --> 0:12:47.156
<v Speaker 1>there was no one else in the room, just him

0:12:47.476 --> 0:12:50.996
<v Speaker 1>and I watched and I scribbled furiously notes as he spoke,

0:12:51.396 --> 0:12:56.316
<v Speaker 1>and realized in the moment that I was watching a

0:12:56.396 --> 0:13:00.236
<v Speaker 1>microcosm of Sam Bankmanfree's relationship with the outside world, especially

0:13:00.236 --> 0:13:03.156
<v Speaker 1>the outside world that organized hisself around piles of money.

0:13:03.156 --> 0:13:05.756
<v Speaker 2>And how would you describe that relationship.

0:13:05.516 --> 0:13:08.876
<v Speaker 1>Sycophanic towards him? There was a certain obliviousness on his

0:13:08.876 --> 0:13:11.156
<v Speaker 1>part to who these people were and why they wanted

0:13:11.196 --> 0:13:14.156
<v Speaker 1>what they wanted. He knew they wanted money, but beyond that,

0:13:14.236 --> 0:13:16.196
<v Speaker 1>he didn't pay that close attention to who they were.

0:13:16.276 --> 0:13:18.676
<v Speaker 1>He's trying to figure out just how much attention he

0:13:18.716 --> 0:13:21.596
<v Speaker 1>should pay to these people because they were constant. It

0:13:21.676 --> 0:13:25.076
<v Speaker 1>was like brunch with Shack and dinner with the head

0:13:25.076 --> 0:13:27.356
<v Speaker 1>of Gold and Sacks. A lot of this was completely

0:13:27.396 --> 0:13:27.836
<v Speaker 1>new to him.

0:13:28.236 --> 0:13:31.916
<v Speaker 2>So on this Anna Winter call, he agrees to what

0:13:31.956 --> 0:13:37.116
<v Speaker 2>she's asking for, to maybe sponsor attend something the met gala,

0:13:37.196 --> 0:13:39.996
<v Speaker 2>but then in the end he cancels on her at

0:13:40.036 --> 0:13:40.756
<v Speaker 2>the last minute.

0:13:41.116 --> 0:13:45.116
<v Speaker 1>Much more complicated than that, because he seems to agree

0:13:45.116 --> 0:13:50.036
<v Speaker 1>to everything she says, everything because he's actually not really listening.

0:13:50.036 --> 0:13:52.316
<v Speaker 1>He's playing a video game when he's talking to her.

0:13:52.636 --> 0:13:55.676
<v Speaker 1>He just turns her picture off when she's talking and

0:13:55.756 --> 0:13:58.796
<v Speaker 1>plays the video game. And only when he hears like,

0:13:59.036 --> 0:14:00.636
<v Speaker 1>oh Sam, what do you think of that? Does he

0:14:00.716 --> 0:14:03.556
<v Speaker 1>wake up, turn her picture back on, stall get the

0:14:03.636 --> 0:14:07.596
<v Speaker 1>question again and answer it. She would have understandably left

0:14:07.636 --> 0:14:11.556
<v Speaker 1>that conversation thinking that he was all in on the

0:14:11.636 --> 0:14:14.116
<v Speaker 1>met Gala, that he was going to go, maybe even

0:14:14.196 --> 0:14:17.596
<v Speaker 1>pay for it, But he hasn't actually said very much

0:14:17.636 --> 0:14:22.276
<v Speaker 1>except yep. And then when he's done, I ask him, like, really,

0:14:22.436 --> 0:14:24.716
<v Speaker 1>you're sitting here in your shorts and your cargo shorts

0:14:24.716 --> 0:14:26.276
<v Speaker 1>and your T shirt and your limp socks. You have

0:14:26.316 --> 0:14:28.916
<v Speaker 1>no interest in fashion. You don't even know who she is, Like,

0:14:29.036 --> 0:14:30.436
<v Speaker 1>you're really going to go to that? And he goes,

0:14:30.476 --> 0:14:33.316
<v Speaker 1>I never really thought about it. You know, by the

0:14:33.356 --> 0:14:35.716
<v Speaker 1>time I met him, he had figured out that the

0:14:35.756 --> 0:14:37.876
<v Speaker 1>best way to navigate the world of the rich and

0:14:37.876 --> 0:14:40.596
<v Speaker 1>famous was just to agree with everything they said. He

0:14:40.636 --> 0:14:42.796
<v Speaker 1>actually says this. He says, I've discovered it's like an

0:14:42.836 --> 0:14:45.516
<v Speaker 1>AI program, I discover people like you if you agree

0:14:45.556 --> 0:14:47.036
<v Speaker 1>with him, what would.

0:14:46.876 --> 0:14:51.636
<v Speaker 2>You say that Sam Bankman Freed is or was exceptionally

0:14:51.676 --> 0:14:53.796
<v Speaker 2>good at and exceptionally bad at.

0:14:54.316 --> 0:14:59.196
<v Speaker 1>He was exceptionally bad at understanding how people would feel

0:14:59.236 --> 0:15:03.116
<v Speaker 1>about his behavior, Like even now I think he doesn't

0:15:03.196 --> 0:15:07.156
<v Speaker 1>understand why people are so angry. When he moves from childhood,

0:15:07.196 --> 0:15:09.916
<v Speaker 1>which his child is completely isolated, it has no real

0:15:09.956 --> 0:15:13.156
<v Speaker 1>relationships with anybody, into adulthood and he starts to figure

0:15:13.156 --> 0:15:15.356
<v Speaker 1>out he wants to have relationships with people. He learns

0:15:15.356 --> 0:15:19.276
<v Speaker 1>how to kind of fake emotional his emotions and kind

0:15:19.316 --> 0:15:21.796
<v Speaker 1>of signaling his inner life so that people aren't so

0:15:21.836 --> 0:15:24.116
<v Speaker 1>freaked out by him. There's a sort of absence in

0:15:24.156 --> 0:15:27.316
<v Speaker 1>his imagination of what other people are feeling. What was

0:15:27.316 --> 0:15:32.036
<v Speaker 1>he exceptionally good at. He was interesting in his attempts

0:15:32.076 --> 0:15:36.196
<v Speaker 1>to quantify the unquantifiable. To me, what made him when

0:15:36.196 --> 0:15:38.956
<v Speaker 1>I first met him, such an interesting character was the

0:15:38.956 --> 0:15:41.316
<v Speaker 1>way he was moving through the world was so weird.

0:15:41.636 --> 0:15:46.876
<v Speaker 1>He was essentially moneyballing life. Everything was an expected value calculation,

0:15:47.156 --> 0:15:48.676
<v Speaker 1>and in some ways you can think of him as

0:15:48.676 --> 0:15:53.996
<v Speaker 1>having replaced principles with probabilities. There were no fixed rules.

0:15:54.076 --> 0:15:57.756
<v Speaker 1>Everything was We're going to try to measure the expected

0:15:57.836 --> 0:16:00.716
<v Speaker 1>value of this decision or that decision and do the

0:16:00.756 --> 0:16:04.596
<v Speaker 1>thing that's the highest expected value, and doing things like

0:16:04.756 --> 0:16:06.996
<v Speaker 1>making decisions about whether to get married and have children

0:16:07.076 --> 0:16:07.436
<v Speaker 1>this way.

0:16:10.236 --> 0:16:13.276
<v Speaker 2>Sam Bankman Freed grew up in California. Both his parents

0:16:13.316 --> 0:16:17.476
<v Speaker 2>were legal scholars at Stanford. Sam went to college at MIT,

0:16:17.596 --> 0:16:20.596
<v Speaker 2>where he studied physics and math. It was during college

0:16:20.636 --> 0:16:23.676
<v Speaker 2>that he met a young philosophy professor from Oxford named

0:16:23.756 --> 0:16:27.036
<v Speaker 2>Will mccaskell, who made him think about his life differently.

0:16:27.636 --> 0:16:32.596
<v Speaker 2>Here is a passage from going Infinite.

0:16:32.276 --> 0:16:34.596
<v Speaker 1>The argument that mcaskell put to Sam and a small

0:16:34.636 --> 0:16:37.276
<v Speaker 1>group of Harvard students in the fall of twenty twelve,

0:16:37.596 --> 0:16:41.916
<v Speaker 1>went roughly as follows, you student at an elite university

0:16:42.236 --> 0:16:45.036
<v Speaker 1>will spend roughly eighty thousand hours of your life working.

0:16:45.716 --> 0:16:47.516
<v Speaker 1>If you're the sort of person who wants to do

0:16:47.676 --> 0:16:50.356
<v Speaker 1>good in the world, what is the most effective way

0:16:50.396 --> 0:16:53.996
<v Speaker 1>to spend those hours? Put bluntly, should you do good

0:16:54.276 --> 0:16:56.636
<v Speaker 1>or make money and pay other people to do good?

0:16:57.236 --> 0:16:59.476
<v Speaker 1>Was it better to become a doctor or a banker.

0:17:00.916 --> 0:17:03.516
<v Speaker 1>Mccaskell made a rough calculation of the number of lives

0:17:03.556 --> 0:17:06.356
<v Speaker 1>saved by a doctor working in a poor country where

0:17:06.436 --> 0:17:09.516
<v Speaker 1>lives were cheapest to save. Then he posed a question,

0:17:10.116 --> 0:17:13.876
<v Speaker 1>what if I become an altruistic banker pursuing a lucrative

0:17:13.916 --> 0:17:18.556
<v Speaker 1>career in order to donate my earnings. Even a mediocre

0:17:18.636 --> 0:17:21.796
<v Speaker 1>investment banker could expect sufficient lifetime earnings to pay for

0:17:21.876 --> 0:17:25.796
<v Speaker 1>several doctors in Africa, and thus would save several times

0:17:25.796 --> 0:17:27.796
<v Speaker 1>more lives than any one doctor.

0:17:30.356 --> 0:17:34.956
<v Speaker 2>Mccaskell and his associates called their movement effective altruism. My

0:17:35.196 --> 0:17:39.396
<v Speaker 2>Freakonomics friend and co author Steve Levitt interviewed mccaskell on

0:17:39.476 --> 0:17:44.156
<v Speaker 2>his podcast People I Mostly Admire in August of last year.

0:17:44.236 --> 0:17:47.356
<v Speaker 2>This was just a couple months before Sam Bankman freed

0:17:47.596 --> 0:17:50.556
<v Speaker 2>was arrested. Here is a piece of that interview with

0:17:50.796 --> 0:17:54.196
<v Speaker 2>mccaskell talking about the earning to Give model.

0:17:54.596 --> 0:17:57.476
<v Speaker 4>The biggest success story for learning to give is Sam

0:17:57.516 --> 0:18:01.116
<v Speaker 4>Bankman Freeds, who's now the relitious person in the world

0:18:01.196 --> 0:18:03.516
<v Speaker 4>under the age of thirty five, and he's publicly stated

0:18:03.556 --> 0:18:05.796
<v Speaker 4>he's giving away ninety nine percent of his wealth or more.

0:18:06.036 --> 0:18:08.356
<v Speaker 4>And as all ready i'mping up is giving. I think

0:18:08.436 --> 0:18:10.476
<v Speaker 4>part of what helps here is that we've just built

0:18:10.516 --> 0:18:13.556
<v Speaker 4>this community. It's much easier to live up to your

0:18:13.916 --> 0:18:16.396
<v Speaker 4>ideals if you've got a bunch of people around you

0:18:16.396 --> 0:18:18.796
<v Speaker 4>who will please you for living up to them. And

0:18:19.036 --> 0:18:22.796
<v Speaker 4>maybe you'll feel shunned or less welcome if you're claiming

0:18:22.876 --> 0:18:25.156
<v Speaker 4>that you want to do enormous amounts of good and

0:18:25.476 --> 0:18:27.156
<v Speaker 4>give enormous amounts but actually aren't.

0:18:27.796 --> 0:18:31.796
<v Speaker 2>When Bankman Freed heard mccaskell's pitch back in twenty twelve,

0:18:32.356 --> 0:18:36.196
<v Speaker 2>he was sold. He ultimately decided to make as much

0:18:36.276 --> 0:18:41.156
<v Speaker 2>money as possible. His personal goal was infinity dollars, thus

0:18:41.276 --> 0:18:44.476
<v Speaker 2>the title of Michael Lewis's book, and that's why after

0:18:44.516 --> 0:18:47.116
<v Speaker 2>he graduated from MIT, he took a job in New

0:18:47.196 --> 0:18:50.396
<v Speaker 2>York doing high frequency trading at Jane Street Capital.

0:18:50.836 --> 0:18:52.876
<v Speaker 1>The people on Wall Street who hired him would have

0:18:52.916 --> 0:18:55.396
<v Speaker 1>told you and that he was extremely good when you

0:18:55.476 --> 0:18:59.236
<v Speaker 1>gave him games to play that required these expected value calculations.

0:18:59.396 --> 0:19:01.956
<v Speaker 1>He was a wizard that he was really really good

0:19:01.956 --> 0:19:06.316
<v Speaker 1>at dealing with sort of messy, semi chaotic environments and

0:19:06.356 --> 0:19:09.196
<v Speaker 1>making the smart decisions in them. Here's an example. If

0:19:09.236 --> 0:19:11.716
<v Speaker 1>you asked him to sit down and play chess with

0:19:11.756 --> 0:19:15.316
<v Speaker 1>a grand master, he would have been okay, but not great.

0:19:15.356 --> 0:19:18.036
<v Speaker 1>But if you change the game it was speed chess,

0:19:18.036 --> 0:19:19.956
<v Speaker 1>and you had five seconds to make a move, and

0:19:20.116 --> 0:19:22.916
<v Speaker 1>every minute you change the rules of the game so

0:19:22.996 --> 0:19:24.756
<v Speaker 1>that all of a sudden the bishops have to be

0:19:24.796 --> 0:19:26.996
<v Speaker 1>pawns and the pawns have to be bishops. He might

0:19:26.996 --> 0:19:29.676
<v Speaker 1>have beaten the grand master in that kind of environment

0:19:29.716 --> 0:19:32.316
<v Speaker 1>where it's almost impossible to know what the right answer is,

0:19:32.316 --> 0:19:34.716
<v Speaker 1>but you can make some quick judgments and act on them.

0:19:35.076 --> 0:19:36.276
<v Speaker 1>He was especially good.

0:19:36.716 --> 0:19:41.036
<v Speaker 2>When you say he replaced principles with probabilities. It strikes

0:19:41.036 --> 0:19:44.796
<v Speaker 2>me that that's a good way of describing the fear

0:19:45.516 --> 0:19:47.756
<v Speaker 2>that's going on right now of what AI is going

0:19:47.836 --> 0:19:48.116
<v Speaker 2>to do.

0:19:48.636 --> 0:19:51.036
<v Speaker 1>That's funny you say this When I was thinking about

0:19:51.076 --> 0:19:53.796
<v Speaker 1>what this story was a parable for when I was

0:19:53.796 --> 0:19:55.316
<v Speaker 1>writing it, one of the things that kept popping in

0:19:55.316 --> 0:19:57.116
<v Speaker 1>my head was a parable for AI. It was like

0:19:57.156 --> 0:19:59.796
<v Speaker 1>a foreshadowing of what happened when you let an artificial

0:19:59.796 --> 0:20:02.356
<v Speaker 1>intelligence loosen the world with a goal, telling it what

0:20:02.476 --> 0:20:04.716
<v Speaker 1>to do, but not telling it how to do it right.

0:20:05.116 --> 0:20:07.556
<v Speaker 1>So you tell it to get a reservation at your

0:20:07.556 --> 0:20:10.236
<v Speaker 1>favorite restaurant tomorrow night, and it go out and finds

0:20:10.236 --> 0:20:12.276
<v Speaker 1>that the restaurants fully booked and starts to kill the

0:20:12.276 --> 0:20:14.796
<v Speaker 1>people who have reservations to get you a table. That's

0:20:14.836 --> 0:20:18.236
<v Speaker 1>Sam Bagmunfreed. That's Sam Bagman Freed. He's programmed him sell

0:20:18.356 --> 0:20:20.756
<v Speaker 1>himself to make as much money as possible to then

0:20:20.916 --> 0:20:24.556
<v Speaker 1>spend to to defray existential risk to humanity without any

0:20:24.596 --> 0:20:27.716
<v Speaker 1>instructions about what he can't do in order to do that.

0:20:28.316 --> 0:20:31.836
<v Speaker 1>I felt, at any given moment when he's making his decisions,

0:20:32.076 --> 0:20:36.356
<v Speaker 1>he was always on pretty shaky ground in his calculations, Like,

0:20:36.796 --> 0:20:40.196
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what the probability of AI wiping us

0:20:40.196 --> 0:20:42.556
<v Speaker 1>all out, or some pandemic wiping us all out, or

0:20:42.556 --> 0:20:45.516
<v Speaker 1>an asteroid hitting the earth, but neither is he And

0:20:45.636 --> 0:20:48.316
<v Speaker 1>yet he's putting very confidently numbers on these things and

0:20:48.396 --> 0:20:49.996
<v Speaker 1>acting on these numbers.

0:20:52.116 --> 0:20:55.076
<v Speaker 2>Many of the people Bankman Freed recruited to work at

0:20:55.116 --> 0:21:00.556
<v Speaker 2>Alameda and FTX also considered themselves effective altruists or eas

0:21:00.876 --> 0:21:04.276
<v Speaker 2>and they talked about the expected value of their actions

0:21:04.636 --> 0:21:05.556
<v Speaker 2>the same way he did.

0:21:06.076 --> 0:21:09.636
<v Speaker 1>It was quirky, and it was weird watching people think

0:21:09.676 --> 0:21:12.436
<v Speaker 1>they could be precise about things that you just couldn't know.

0:21:12.996 --> 0:21:15.516
<v Speaker 1>But I actually quite liked the fact that there were

0:21:15.516 --> 0:21:18.436
<v Speaker 1>people who were worrying about these things. And to their credit,

0:21:18.556 --> 0:21:21.276
<v Speaker 1>right the effective altruists get to the fear of AI

0:21:21.396 --> 0:21:24.276
<v Speaker 1>before all of us. They weren't all wrong. They aren't

0:21:24.276 --> 0:21:25.916
<v Speaker 1>all wrong. My god, we may look back and say

0:21:25.916 --> 0:21:26.596
<v Speaker 1>they were all right.

0:21:27.036 --> 0:21:30.956
<v Speaker 2>I'm curious what impressions you walked away with of the

0:21:30.996 --> 0:21:34.916
<v Speaker 2>effective altruist crowd, especially Will mccaskell, the ringleader. I'm curious

0:21:35.356 --> 0:21:39.236
<v Speaker 2>whether you think he and the core movement are sincere.

0:21:39.476 --> 0:21:42.436
<v Speaker 2>Are they a little bit grifty? Are they both?

0:21:42.836 --> 0:21:46.116
<v Speaker 1>I think they're completely sincere. But on the other hand,

0:21:46.116 --> 0:21:48.556
<v Speaker 1>the best con men believe their own con but I

0:21:48.556 --> 0:21:51.476
<v Speaker 1>don't think of them as con men at all. They're academics.

0:21:51.956 --> 0:21:56.236
<v Speaker 1>There's a kind of blinder quality to them. The whole movement.

0:21:56.516 --> 0:21:59.196
<v Speaker 1>It has this cult like quality in that it attracts

0:21:59.196 --> 0:22:01.556
<v Speaker 1>a certain kind of person and then they get their

0:22:01.556 --> 0:22:04.476
<v Speaker 1>meaning of life from the thing. But it's a kind

0:22:04.476 --> 0:22:08.236
<v Speaker 1>of anti cult cult in that unlike most cults, well

0:22:08.396 --> 0:22:10.916
<v Speaker 1>what is it's a cult? Reason right, It's a cult

0:22:10.916 --> 0:22:13.716
<v Speaker 1>where if you have a better argument inside the cult,

0:22:14.316 --> 0:22:17.196
<v Speaker 1>you win and the cult changes. So it's a little

0:22:17.196 --> 0:22:21.356
<v Speaker 1>different from most cults. And it has had this capacity

0:22:21.396 --> 0:22:24.636
<v Speaker 1>to kind of phase change in a way that cults

0:22:24.916 --> 0:22:27.996
<v Speaker 1>normally don't. They start up trying to save you poor

0:22:28.076 --> 0:22:31.196
<v Speaker 1>children in Africa, and they end up worrying about human

0:22:31.236 --> 0:22:33.876
<v Speaker 1>beings the trillion years from now living on Mars. I

0:22:33.916 --> 0:22:37.636
<v Speaker 1>think of them as completely sincere, generally pretty sweet natured,

0:22:38.356 --> 0:22:42.796
<v Speaker 1>devoted to logic and reason and argument, and somehow it

0:22:42.836 --> 0:22:44.836
<v Speaker 1>has the capacity still to run off the rails.

0:22:45.436 --> 0:22:48.196
<v Speaker 2>Did they respect Sam or did they just love him

0:22:48.196 --> 0:22:48.796
<v Speaker 2>for his money?

0:22:49.196 --> 0:22:51.716
<v Speaker 1>I think they felt about Sam the way Sam's parents

0:22:51.716 --> 0:22:54.996
<v Speaker 1>felt about Sam. They were scared both for and of him,

0:22:55.596 --> 0:23:00.196
<v Speaker 1>and they were interestingly, even in good times, a little

0:23:00.236 --> 0:23:03.356
<v Speaker 1>worried about him being too closely identified with the movement,

0:23:03.396 --> 0:23:05.356
<v Speaker 1>because he became kind of the face of the movement.

0:23:05.756 --> 0:23:08.236
<v Speaker 1>I think they smelled the existential risk to the movement.

0:23:08.636 --> 0:23:10.676
<v Speaker 1>He became too important to them.

0:23:10.956 --> 0:23:13.956
<v Speaker 2>How bad has his downfall been for them?

0:23:14.116 --> 0:23:16.956
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how. With the recruiting numbers in the

0:23:16.996 --> 0:23:19.836
<v Speaker 1>Stanford and Princeton and Harvard and MIT math and physics

0:23:19.876 --> 0:23:22.716
<v Speaker 1>departments are looking like these days can have been good?

0:23:23.476 --> 0:23:26.516
<v Speaker 1>Can have been good? My guess is it causes a

0:23:26.516 --> 0:23:28.876
<v Speaker 1>bit of a retrenchment in how they think about what

0:23:28.916 --> 0:23:32.076
<v Speaker 1>they're doing. I think that back in the day, when

0:23:32.076 --> 0:23:35.676
<v Speaker 1>it was just being more intellectually rigorous about what you

0:23:35.716 --> 0:23:39.716
<v Speaker 1>did with charitable dollars, it was pretty unobjectionable. Where I

0:23:39.716 --> 0:23:42.156
<v Speaker 1>find the whole thing jumps the shark is the earn

0:23:42.236 --> 0:23:45.036
<v Speaker 1>to give idea. I'm not quite sure why I feel

0:23:45.036 --> 0:23:47.476
<v Speaker 1>this way, but the whole idea that to stop trying

0:23:47.476 --> 0:23:50.756
<v Speaker 1>to do good yourself and maximize the dollars you make

0:23:50.796 --> 0:23:53.316
<v Speaker 1>and pay someone else to do good with them. There's

0:23:53.356 --> 0:23:58.876
<v Speaker 1>something about divorcing charitable acts from human sympathy that feels

0:23:58.876 --> 0:23:59.676
<v Speaker 1>a little weird to me.

0:24:00.396 --> 0:24:03.316
<v Speaker 2>There's this concept. I think it's mostly in psychology, but

0:24:03.356 --> 0:24:06.076
<v Speaker 2>others use it called moral licensing. It's this idea that

0:24:06.076 --> 0:24:09.556
<v Speaker 2>if you're doing something great for people or the world,

0:24:09.636 --> 0:24:12.476
<v Speaker 2>in one corner of your life, you give yourself licensed

0:24:12.476 --> 0:24:15.596
<v Speaker 2>to lie or cheat or steal whatever. In another corner.

0:24:16.476 --> 0:24:19.836
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that he felt that because he's making

0:24:19.876 --> 0:24:22.316
<v Speaker 2>money in the service of effective altruism, which is going

0:24:22.396 --> 0:24:26.716
<v Speaker 2>to use money to solve potentially existential problems, that that

0:24:26.916 --> 0:24:29.556
<v Speaker 2>just trumped everything else, And that if he needed to

0:24:29.596 --> 0:24:33.556
<v Speaker 2>be deceitful or withhold information, etc. That he's still kind

0:24:33.556 --> 0:24:35.276
<v Speaker 2>of in the plus column because of the big one.

0:24:35.916 --> 0:24:39.516
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I think so he wouldn't put it that way.

0:24:40.116 --> 0:24:42.396
<v Speaker 1>I'm trying to think how he would put it, but

0:24:42.556 --> 0:24:45.316
<v Speaker 1>the effect is the same. This is the whole business

0:24:45.316 --> 0:24:49.716
<v Speaker 1>of replacing principles with probabilities. There are no firm, fixed

0:24:49.876 --> 0:24:54.436
<v Speaker 1>rules that he will obey. So why does he allow

0:24:54.516 --> 0:24:58.156
<v Speaker 1>himself to move through the world without obeying firm fixed rules.

0:24:58.676 --> 0:25:03.876
<v Speaker 1>It's because he thinks this larger goal justifies it. He

0:25:03.916 --> 0:25:07.436
<v Speaker 1>figures out as a kid or as pretty young person,

0:25:08.196 --> 0:25:11.036
<v Speaker 1>that he has the ability to do harm because he

0:25:11.076 --> 0:25:14.516
<v Speaker 1>doesn't feel what other people feel. It's a bit like

0:25:14.636 --> 0:25:17.196
<v Speaker 1>if you didn't feel pain, you're more likely like put

0:25:17.196 --> 0:25:19.716
<v Speaker 1>your hand on the stove and burn it off. He's

0:25:19.796 --> 0:25:24.036
<v Speaker 1>lacking some essential human equipment that would constrain.

0:25:23.676 --> 0:25:25.676
<v Speaker 2>His behavior, and he knows it.

0:25:25.836 --> 0:25:29.996
<v Speaker 1>And he knows it, and so when he discovers a rule,

0:25:30.076 --> 0:25:32.836
<v Speaker 1>he can give himself our goal he can give himself,

0:25:32.916 --> 0:25:37.156
<v Speaker 1>and the goal seems noble, lower the existential risk to humanity,

0:25:37.236 --> 0:25:40.076
<v Speaker 1>save human lives. In a way, He's trying to put

0:25:40.156 --> 0:25:43.876
<v Speaker 1>some constraint on the harms he creates. But I do

0:25:43.916 --> 0:25:46.836
<v Speaker 1>think moral licensing will do as an explanation.

0:25:47.276 --> 0:25:50.476
<v Speaker 2>I'm curious to know what the effective altruists make of

0:25:50.516 --> 0:25:54.396
<v Speaker 2>someone like Bill Gates. He's spent the past ten fifteen

0:25:54.436 --> 0:25:57.276
<v Speaker 2>years spending billions of dollars trying to do what looks

0:25:57.276 --> 0:25:59.476
<v Speaker 2>to me like a version of what they want to do,

0:25:59.556 --> 0:26:02.356
<v Speaker 2>and there have been people throughout history trying to do

0:26:02.436 --> 0:26:05.596
<v Speaker 2>similar things. What do you see as the biggest distinction

0:26:05.796 --> 0:26:08.636
<v Speaker 2>between Gates and the effective altruists.

0:26:08.716 --> 0:26:11.836
<v Speaker 1>Degree of fanaticism and rigor. I mean, I think Gates

0:26:11.876 --> 0:26:13.716
<v Speaker 1>does a lot of things other than just try to

0:26:13.756 --> 0:26:17.316
<v Speaker 1>maximize the lives saved with his dollars. But I think

0:26:17.316 --> 0:26:20.116
<v Speaker 1>the eas would tell you that Gates is the closest

0:26:20.116 --> 0:26:22.796
<v Speaker 1>thing to an EA who's not an EA. They're probably

0:26:22.836 --> 0:26:25.076
<v Speaker 1>dollars that Bill Gates have given to museums that would

0:26:25.076 --> 0:26:28.636
<v Speaker 1>disturb them because they're a dollar given to a museum

0:26:28.796 --> 0:26:31.076
<v Speaker 1>is a dollar wasted in their minds.

0:26:31.956 --> 0:26:35.716
<v Speaker 2>Coming up after the break, another way to waste dollars.

0:26:36.156 --> 0:26:38.556
<v Speaker 1>If you give Donald Trump five billion dollars not to

0:26:38.636 --> 0:26:40.316
<v Speaker 1>run for president, what do you think he's going to do?

0:26:40.796 --> 0:26:43.876
<v Speaker 2>I'm Stephen Dubner. This is Freakonomics Radio. We'll be right back.

0:27:02.516 --> 0:27:06.516
<v Speaker 2>Sam Bankman Free didn't buy a yacht or have expensive

0:27:06.556 --> 0:27:09.716
<v Speaker 2>tastes on most of the normal dimensions, but he did

0:27:09.716 --> 0:27:12.756
<v Speaker 2>spend a lot of money in the political arena. Some

0:27:12.836 --> 0:27:17.316
<v Speaker 2>of this went toward influencing cryptocurrency regulation in the US,

0:27:17.436 --> 0:27:21.476
<v Speaker 2>which would have let his FTX Exchange expand its business,

0:27:22.396 --> 0:27:25.836
<v Speaker 2>but his political spending went in other directions too. Here

0:27:25.916 --> 0:27:29.276
<v Speaker 2>again is Michael Lewis, author of Going Infinite.

0:27:29.716 --> 0:27:33.676
<v Speaker 1>So he spends ten million dollars in an Oregon Democratic

0:27:33.716 --> 0:27:37.716
<v Speaker 1>primary on a candidate named Carrick Flynn. Sam identifies him

0:27:37.716 --> 0:27:41.196
<v Speaker 1>because he is an effective altruist who's expert in pandemic

0:27:41.236 --> 0:27:44.996
<v Speaker 1>prevention without paying any attention to his viability as a candidate,

0:27:45.036 --> 0:27:49.156
<v Speaker 1>and Carrick Flynn has, among other traits, fear of public speaking, deeply,

0:27:49.316 --> 0:27:53.636
<v Speaker 1>deeply insecure, and upset when people say something critical about him.

0:27:53.996 --> 0:27:56.436
<v Speaker 1>Lots of things that would be red flags in a

0:27:56.436 --> 0:27:57.396
<v Speaker 1>political candidate.

0:27:57.876 --> 0:27:58.756
<v Speaker 2>Was he from Oregon?

0:27:58.796 --> 0:28:01.316
<v Speaker 1>At least he was a carbon bagger. I think he'd

0:28:01.316 --> 0:28:03.876
<v Speaker 1>spent time there, but he'd basically been living in Washington

0:28:03.916 --> 0:28:07.036
<v Speaker 1>for a long stretch. And Carrick Flynn ends up winning

0:28:07.236 --> 0:28:09.436
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, twenty percent of the vote. That's one

0:28:09.476 --> 0:28:11.476
<v Speaker 1>bucket of Sam Beckmer free spending is trying to get

0:28:11.476 --> 0:28:16.036
<v Speaker 1>candidates into Congress or encourage actually elected representatives to take

0:28:16.076 --> 0:28:18.196
<v Speaker 1>more interest in things like pandemic prevention.

0:28:18.676 --> 0:28:20.236
<v Speaker 2>How would you rank on a scale of zerre to

0:28:20.236 --> 0:28:23.276
<v Speaker 2>attend how much Sam actually cared about that issue?

0:28:23.636 --> 0:28:25.636
<v Speaker 1>A lot nine and a half.

0:28:26.036 --> 0:28:29.116
<v Speaker 2>And this was happening during COVID already, correct.

0:28:29.316 --> 0:28:32.156
<v Speaker 1>Well, it just seemed like the one thing that's obvious

0:28:32.196 --> 0:28:35.276
<v Speaker 1>to do is to build some equivalent of the National

0:28:35.276 --> 0:28:40.516
<v Speaker 1>Weather Service for disease, global pathogen prediction and detection. And

0:28:40.596 --> 0:28:42.316
<v Speaker 1>he was interested, not only interested in that, he was

0:28:42.356 --> 0:28:44.596
<v Speaker 1>actually putting money into it. And I thought that's interesting.

0:28:45.476 --> 0:28:49.236
<v Speaker 1>Alongside that Sam had decided all by himself, and much

0:28:49.276 --> 0:28:52.836
<v Speaker 1>to the chagrin of other effective altruists, that Donald Trump

0:28:52.916 --> 0:28:56.676
<v Speaker 1>presented a threat to democracy. Democracy was the most likely

0:28:56.796 --> 0:29:01.076
<v Speaker 1>tool for addressing existential risk to humanity. So therefore Donald

0:29:01.076 --> 0:29:03.916
<v Speaker 1>Trump needed to be stopped, and so he poured lots

0:29:03.956 --> 0:29:07.276
<v Speaker 1>of money into anti Trump's stuff, and he did it.

0:29:07.316 --> 0:29:10.876
<v Speaker 1>I think mainly through Mitch McConnell influenced packs and the

0:29:10.996 --> 0:29:16.396
<v Speaker 1>idea there was to find, especially in Republican primaries, candidates

0:29:16.556 --> 0:29:19.756
<v Speaker 1>who were not real Trumpers. Everybody was seeming to be

0:29:19.756 --> 0:29:23.076
<v Speaker 1>a Trumper, and McConnell had distinguished between the people who

0:29:23.116 --> 0:29:25.316
<v Speaker 1>really thought the election was rigged from the people who

0:29:25.396 --> 0:29:28.556
<v Speaker 1>just say it, and the latter were maybe more likely

0:29:28.596 --> 0:29:29.796
<v Speaker 1>to govern responsibly.

0:29:30.196 --> 0:29:33.316
<v Speaker 2>And what's your sense of efficacy in that realm, if

0:29:33.356 --> 0:29:33.916
<v Speaker 2>any at all?

0:29:34.476 --> 0:29:37.516
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's funny. I don't know how influential the

0:29:37.596 --> 0:29:39.796
<v Speaker 1>money was, though I think it was some tens of

0:29:39.836 --> 0:29:44.076
<v Speaker 1>millions of dollars. But I did have a glimpse of

0:29:44.156 --> 0:29:48.556
<v Speaker 1>Sam bankman Fried's style meddling. He's going to gamey meddling

0:29:48.796 --> 0:29:52.196
<v Speaker 1>in this process. At the moment that we had this conversation,

0:29:52.436 --> 0:29:56.756
<v Speaker 1>he was taking an interest in the Missouri Senate primary.

0:29:57.236 --> 0:30:00.596
<v Speaker 1>There were two candidates at that time who seemed especially viable.

0:30:01.076 --> 0:30:05.316
<v Speaker 1>Both were named Eric Eric Schmidt and Eric Britons. Eric

0:30:05.356 --> 0:30:08.916
<v Speaker 1>Britons was a full throated Trumper. Eric Smith seemed to

0:30:08.916 --> 0:30:12.316
<v Speaker 1>be taking it, at least so said McConnell's people. And

0:30:12.636 --> 0:30:16.516
<v Speaker 1>Sam told me this isn't a private conversation. That his

0:30:16.836 --> 0:30:20.156
<v Speaker 1>political operation had been having conversations with the Trump political

0:30:20.196 --> 0:30:23.156
<v Speaker 1>operation because they were afraid Trump was going to jump

0:30:23.156 --> 0:30:26.116
<v Speaker 1>into this race and endorse Eric Britons, the real Trumper,

0:30:26.396 --> 0:30:28.756
<v Speaker 1>and that that would actually put Britons over the top.

0:30:29.316 --> 0:30:31.116
<v Speaker 1>So they were trying to think of ways to stop

0:30:31.196 --> 0:30:34.436
<v Speaker 1>this from happening, and they came up with this idea

0:30:34.476 --> 0:30:36.996
<v Speaker 1>that they would tell Trump that just come out and

0:30:36.996 --> 0:30:40.516
<v Speaker 1>say he was for Eric, without specifying which Eric, because

0:30:40.596 --> 0:30:43.316
<v Speaker 1>both the candidates were named Eric, and that the argument

0:30:43.356 --> 0:30:45.556
<v Speaker 1>to Trump was one it would be funny and be

0:30:45.596 --> 0:30:47.996
<v Speaker 1>a meme and everybody would talk about it. And the

0:30:48.076 --> 0:30:50.636
<v Speaker 1>second was he didn't care which Eric won. All he

0:30:50.716 --> 0:30:53.436
<v Speaker 1>cared was that he backed the winner. So Sam's telling

0:30:53.436 --> 0:30:55.116
<v Speaker 1>me this and I've said, how g real could this be?

0:30:55.516 --> 0:30:57.436
<v Speaker 1>In the same breath he's telling me that he's offering

0:30:57.476 --> 0:30:59.756
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump five billion dollars not to run for president,

0:31:00.556 --> 0:31:03.036
<v Speaker 1>And two days later, Trump comes out on True Social

0:31:03.196 --> 0:31:05.636
<v Speaker 1>and says I'm for Eric, and indeed it was a meme,

0:31:05.676 --> 0:31:08.436
<v Speaker 1>and indeed everybody thought it was funny, and indeed diffused

0:31:08.516 --> 0:31:11.116
<v Speaker 1>Trump's in luence, and indeed Eric Schmidt won.

0:31:11.596 --> 0:31:15.356
<v Speaker 2>Now you glossed over the plan to pay Trump directly

0:31:15.396 --> 0:31:18.036
<v Speaker 2>five billion dollars to not run again in twenty twenty four.

0:31:18.276 --> 0:31:19.196
<v Speaker 2>How real was that?

0:31:19.796 --> 0:31:21.916
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. I could tell you where it was

0:31:22.076 --> 0:31:24.516
<v Speaker 1>when I talked to him about it. It's funny in

0:31:24.556 --> 0:31:28.156
<v Speaker 1>retrospect that he was worried it was illegal. The question

0:31:28.356 --> 0:31:31.196
<v Speaker 1>was is it legal to pay Donald anybody not to

0:31:31.276 --> 0:31:32.116
<v Speaker 1>run for president?

0:31:32.516 --> 0:31:33.996
<v Speaker 2>Did you ever learn the answer that question.

0:31:34.516 --> 0:31:36.636
<v Speaker 1>I haven't learned the answer to that question. Is it

0:31:36.676 --> 0:31:39.916
<v Speaker 1>a bribe? Is it? But the practical point, and this

0:31:39.956 --> 0:31:42.076
<v Speaker 1>is the point I actually made to Sam, I said,

0:31:42.076 --> 0:31:45.556
<v Speaker 1>this is insane. If you give Donald Trump five billion

0:31:45.596 --> 0:31:47.356
<v Speaker 1>dollars not to run for president, what do you think

0:31:47.356 --> 0:31:49.636
<v Speaker 1>he's going to do? You know what he's going to do.

0:31:49.676 --> 0:31:51.396
<v Speaker 1>He's going to take the five billion dollars and he's

0:31:51.396 --> 0:31:53.516
<v Speaker 1>going to run for president. This is not like an

0:31:53.596 --> 0:31:57.716
<v Speaker 1>enforceable contract. And it never I know that they had

0:31:57.716 --> 0:31:58.676
<v Speaker 1>the conversations.

0:31:59.196 --> 0:32:01.356
<v Speaker 2>Do you know at what level of the Trump organization

0:32:01.436 --> 0:32:02.796
<v Speaker 2>or campaign he was speaking with.

0:32:03.316 --> 0:32:05.516
<v Speaker 1>If I had to guess, we got to qualify that.

0:32:05.556 --> 0:32:09.956
<v Speaker 1>I'm guessing that the CEO of FTX Digital Markets was

0:32:09.956 --> 0:32:13.996
<v Speaker 1>a fellow named Ryan Salem, and Ryan Salem was Republican

0:32:14.156 --> 0:32:18.156
<v Speaker 1>and apparently very friendly with Donald Trump Junior, and I

0:32:18.196 --> 0:32:21.556
<v Speaker 1>had the impression that the conversation was happening between those two,

0:32:22.396 --> 0:32:25.556
<v Speaker 1>but I don't know if that's true. Whatever channel it

0:32:25.676 --> 0:32:27.796
<v Speaker 1>was was the same channel that got Trump to say

0:32:27.796 --> 0:32:31.036
<v Speaker 1>I'm for Eric, so we know the channel exists. The

0:32:31.116 --> 0:32:34.036
<v Speaker 1>question is could that ever have happened in real life?

0:32:34.476 --> 0:32:35.996
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not sure it could ever have happened in

0:32:36.036 --> 0:32:37.756
<v Speaker 1>real life. But it was a really good example of

0:32:37.756 --> 0:32:41.476
<v Speaker 1>Sam Bekman Freed addressing a problem. It's like pretty original thought,

0:32:41.556 --> 0:32:42.476
<v Speaker 1>pay him not to run?

0:32:44.916 --> 0:32:48.596
<v Speaker 2>So would it have been illegal for Sam Bekman Free

0:32:48.636 --> 0:32:51.516
<v Speaker 2>to pay Donald Trump five billion dollars to not run

0:32:51.676 --> 0:32:55.676
<v Speaker 2>for president? The UK has a law that forbids, payment

0:32:55.836 --> 0:32:58.996
<v Speaker 2>or promise of payment to get a candidate to withdraw

0:32:59.156 --> 0:33:01.996
<v Speaker 2>from an election. In the US, it is less clear.

0:33:02.116 --> 0:33:04.916
<v Speaker 2>People have been sent to prison for paying candidates to

0:33:05.036 --> 0:33:08.876
<v Speaker 2>drop out, but in those cases the crimes were violations

0:33:08.916 --> 0:33:14.276
<v Speaker 2>of campaign finance disclosure requirements, not the payments themselves. It

0:33:14.396 --> 0:33:17.596
<v Speaker 2>is also against US law to bribe a public official

0:33:17.676 --> 0:33:21.196
<v Speaker 2>to influence a quote official act, but it's not clear

0:33:21.236 --> 0:33:25.316
<v Speaker 2>that running for office counts as an official act. Whatever

0:33:25.356 --> 0:33:28.436
<v Speaker 2>the case, it's pretty clear that Sam Bankman Freed didn't

0:33:28.476 --> 0:33:32.156
<v Speaker 2>have the chance to pay Donald Trump five billion dollars

0:33:32.196 --> 0:33:35.596
<v Speaker 2>not to run. It's also worth noting that his mother,

0:33:35.836 --> 0:33:38.876
<v Speaker 2>Barbara Freed, may have inspired this idea.

0:33:39.796 --> 0:33:42.876
<v Speaker 1>Before Sam got rich. She had built a political operation.

0:33:43.276 --> 0:33:45.756
<v Speaker 1>They were trying to find smarter ways to give money away,

0:33:45.956 --> 0:33:49.396
<v Speaker 1>and it was pretty explicitly anti Trump. So Sam's first

0:33:49.396 --> 0:33:50.596
<v Speaker 1>donations are through her.

0:33:51.076 --> 0:33:54.796
<v Speaker 2>So You've said a couple things about Sam's parents that

0:33:54.876 --> 0:33:58.156
<v Speaker 2>I find really interesting. They're in the book very you know,

0:33:58.196 --> 0:34:01.916
<v Speaker 2>they're kind of often there but below the surface. Can

0:34:01.956 --> 0:34:05.716
<v Speaker 2>you just draw out that relationship and tell me, you know,

0:34:05.876 --> 0:34:09.636
<v Speaker 2>which directions the emotions flow these days, and what those

0:34:09.676 --> 0:34:10.476
<v Speaker 2>emotions may be.

0:34:11.196 --> 0:34:14.076
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the unusual things about the relationship

0:34:14.116 --> 0:34:17.356
<v Speaker 1>between the parents and the child was the parents pretty

0:34:17.436 --> 0:34:20.076
<v Speaker 1>quickly gave up on the idea he was a child.

0:34:20.316 --> 0:34:23.676
<v Speaker 1>I remember Sam's mom, Barbara telling me that he was

0:34:23.796 --> 0:34:25.876
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, eight years old and she had just

0:34:25.916 --> 0:34:29.196
<v Speaker 1>written some abstruse paper for some academic journal, and he

0:34:29.276 --> 0:34:31.716
<v Speaker 1>asks her what it's about, and she sort of humors him,

0:34:31.796 --> 0:34:34.316
<v Speaker 1>but he pushes and presses, and she actually tells him

0:34:34.316 --> 0:34:37.556
<v Speaker 1>what it's about, and she says his responses were smarter

0:34:37.676 --> 0:34:40.356
<v Speaker 1>than the responses she got from the peer review. Couple

0:34:40.436 --> 0:34:45.356
<v Speaker 1>with they made some brief pass at doing childish things

0:34:45.396 --> 0:34:47.916
<v Speaker 1>with him. She took him to an amusement park and

0:34:47.956 --> 0:34:49.996
<v Speaker 1>she was kind of hauling him from ride to ride

0:34:50.276 --> 0:34:52.236
<v Speaker 1>and at some point she sees he's looking at her

0:34:52.236 --> 0:34:54.916
<v Speaker 1>and just observing her, and he says, are you having

0:34:54.956 --> 0:34:55.436
<v Speaker 1>fun yet?

0:34:55.476 --> 0:34:55.756
<v Speaker 2>Mom?

0:34:56.276 --> 0:34:59.156
<v Speaker 1>They both had the story in their head again even

0:34:59.196 --> 0:35:02.356
<v Speaker 1>in good times, back when Sam was a billionaire, that

0:35:02.436 --> 0:35:05.476
<v Speaker 1>he just he wasn't suited to childhood. He didn't connect

0:35:05.476 --> 0:35:08.196
<v Speaker 1>with other people. What scared them, I think was he

0:35:08.196 --> 0:35:10.676
<v Speaker 1>didn't fit into the world. They were really worried he

0:35:10.676 --> 0:35:12.756
<v Speaker 1>would find no place for himself in the world. They

0:35:12.796 --> 0:35:14.916
<v Speaker 1>thought his little brother was going to be fine and

0:35:15.196 --> 0:35:18.036
<v Speaker 1>you know, might be a shining star. They thought Sam

0:35:18.116 --> 0:35:21.916
<v Speaker 1>was never going to like work out because he was

0:35:21.956 --> 0:35:26.316
<v Speaker 1>so socially maladjusted and indifferent. It was indifferent, like indifferent

0:35:26.356 --> 0:35:30.796
<v Speaker 1>to any kind of social interaction. They were then bewildered

0:35:31.356 --> 0:35:34.196
<v Speaker 1>when this child of theirs, is discovered by Jane Street

0:35:34.196 --> 0:35:37.476
<v Speaker 1>and high frequency Trading as God's gift to trading, and

0:35:37.596 --> 0:35:39.996
<v Speaker 1>all of a sudden is endowed with a new identity

0:35:40.276 --> 0:35:44.916
<v Speaker 1>I made for the new financial markets, and then further

0:35:45.116 --> 0:35:49.556
<v Speaker 1>perplexed when he quits that and becomes cryptobillionaire. Like they

0:35:49.556 --> 0:35:53.556
<v Speaker 1>just find it completely implausible, just preposterous that he was

0:35:53.596 --> 0:35:56.836
<v Speaker 1>in the position he was in, but accepted, right, you know,

0:35:57.076 --> 0:36:01.156
<v Speaker 1>that's what happened to Sam now. I mean, obviously they're devastated.

0:36:01.476 --> 0:36:04.716
<v Speaker 1>If I had to guess, they have slightly different views

0:36:04.716 --> 0:36:07.996
<v Speaker 1>of the situation, But the mother is more vocal about

0:36:07.996 --> 0:36:13.516
<v Speaker 1>her views, and I bet right now that she views

0:36:13.836 --> 0:36:17.516
<v Speaker 1>Sam as chiefly a victim. That she thinks he's completely

0:36:17.516 --> 0:36:19.796
<v Speaker 1>innocent of all wrongdoing, and she hasn't asked him what

0:36:19.836 --> 0:36:22.356
<v Speaker 1>he did, so she doesn't know. She hasn't really pushed

0:36:22.396 --> 0:36:26.156
<v Speaker 1>him on it. The truth of the relationship. And this

0:36:26.236 --> 0:36:29.476
<v Speaker 1>is what I think the media generally in the commentary

0:36:29.716 --> 0:36:33.596
<v Speaker 1>gets wrong, is that it, from Sam's point of view,

0:36:33.716 --> 0:36:36.756
<v Speaker 1>was not that close. If you talk to the person

0:36:36.836 --> 0:36:39.996
<v Speaker 1>who ran Sam's scheduling, she'd say the hardest part of

0:36:40.036 --> 0:36:42.276
<v Speaker 1>my week is when one of his parents calls him,

0:36:42.276 --> 0:36:44.276
<v Speaker 1>what's fifteen minutes with him? And I have to lie

0:36:44.316 --> 0:36:46.476
<v Speaker 1>to him because I know Sam doesn't want to do it.

0:36:46.956 --> 0:36:51.236
<v Speaker 1>That Sam kept them really at arm's length and didn't

0:36:51.316 --> 0:36:55.476
<v Speaker 1>welcome their intrusion into his life. And the exception being

0:36:55.556 --> 0:36:57.116
<v Speaker 1>is when he gets in trouble, like when he gets

0:36:57.156 --> 0:36:59.196
<v Speaker 1>in trouble and there's no one else there. But I

0:36:59.196 --> 0:37:02.996
<v Speaker 1>think it probably drives him crazy that first he's back

0:37:02.996 --> 0:37:05.956
<v Speaker 1>in his parents' home under house arrest, and now the

0:37:05.996 --> 0:37:08.036
<v Speaker 1>only people who visited him in jail are his parents.

0:37:08.436 --> 0:37:11.956
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he welcomes parroting. He's never engaged with

0:37:12.036 --> 0:37:16.116
<v Speaker 1>that relationship, so they're sort of imposing their parenting on

0:37:16.276 --> 0:37:20.476
<v Speaker 1>him still and our heartbroken because he's their child and

0:37:20.476 --> 0:37:21.316
<v Speaker 1>they love him.

0:37:21.556 --> 0:37:24.716
<v Speaker 2>A listener wrote in to ask when do Sam Bankmin

0:37:24.756 --> 0:37:26.796
<v Speaker 2>Freed's parents get indicted.

0:37:27.436 --> 0:37:29.276
<v Speaker 1>I don't think the parents had a whole lot of

0:37:29.276 --> 0:37:32.196
<v Speaker 1>insight into the In fact, I know they didn't. I

0:37:32.196 --> 0:37:35.356
<v Speaker 1>would go from an interview with Sam or spending the

0:37:35.476 --> 0:37:39.756
<v Speaker 1>day at the FTX headquarters, occasionally having dinner with the parents,

0:37:40.116 --> 0:37:42.716
<v Speaker 1>and they were desperate for any kind of information about

0:37:42.756 --> 0:37:44.876
<v Speaker 1>what was going on because they had no idea, like

0:37:44.996 --> 0:37:48.756
<v Speaker 1>no idea. What looks probably more damning than it is

0:37:48.876 --> 0:37:51.716
<v Speaker 1>but in retrospect, is that he bought this house in

0:37:51.716 --> 0:37:54.236
<v Speaker 1>the Bahamas and put it in their name. But they were,

0:37:54.356 --> 0:37:57.276
<v Speaker 1>like I promise you, they were only vaguely aware that

0:37:57.316 --> 0:37:59.836
<v Speaker 1>they owned it. They didn't furnish it, they didn't care

0:37:59.876 --> 0:38:02.876
<v Speaker 1>about it, and they gave it back right after it

0:38:02.916 --> 0:38:04.636
<v Speaker 1>all fell apart that they couldn't get rid of it

0:38:04.676 --> 0:38:07.356
<v Speaker 1>fast enough. What the dad was doing, he was mainly

0:38:07.356 --> 0:38:10.236
<v Speaker 1>involved in the philanthropy. He was doing things like working

0:38:10.236 --> 0:38:13.116
<v Speaker 1>with the Bahamas government to make sure that people who

0:38:13.116 --> 0:38:16.436
<v Speaker 1>were in the psychiatric hospital had more contact with human

0:38:16.476 --> 0:38:19.516
<v Speaker 1>beings outside the psychiatric He was really working full time

0:38:19.796 --> 0:38:22.156
<v Speaker 1>as a do gooder. But I don't think either one

0:38:22.236 --> 0:38:31.636
<v Speaker 1>of them are meaningfully evolved in the business.

0:38:28.636 --> 0:38:32.516
<v Speaker 2>We should say. Joe Bankman and Barbara Fried currently face

0:38:32.636 --> 0:38:35.356
<v Speaker 2>a civil lawsuit alleging that they are not as innocent

0:38:35.396 --> 0:38:38.796
<v Speaker 2>as Michael Lewis claims. The suit argues that they quote

0:38:38.876 --> 0:38:42.876
<v Speaker 2>exploited their access and influence within the FTX enterprise to

0:38:42.996 --> 0:38:48.036
<v Speaker 2>enrich themselves. In any case, I did wonder what might

0:38:48.076 --> 0:38:50.676
<v Speaker 2>have happened if one of Sam Bankman Fried's parents had

0:38:50.756 --> 0:38:54.876
<v Speaker 2>been more involved in FTX, or if not them, some

0:38:55.076 --> 0:38:59.076
<v Speaker 2>other potentially competent people who might have served as the

0:38:59.116 --> 0:39:03.716
<v Speaker 2>adults in the room. Bankmin Freed had big plans for

0:39:03.996 --> 0:39:07.996
<v Speaker 2>FTX and for himself. I asked Michael Lewis, if with

0:39:08.156 --> 0:39:12.276
<v Speaker 2>the right help, Bankman Freed could have achieved those plans

0:39:12.436 --> 0:39:14.196
<v Speaker 2>and avoided the law breaking.

0:39:14.796 --> 0:39:18.996
<v Speaker 1>Yes. What stops it from happening right from the get

0:39:19.036 --> 0:39:23.196
<v Speaker 1>go is Sam Bankman Freed's hostility to grown ups, including

0:39:23.196 --> 0:39:26.116
<v Speaker 1>his parents. He took the view that basically everybody over

0:39:26.156 --> 0:39:28.036
<v Speaker 1>the age of thirty five was a waste of time.

0:39:28.556 --> 0:39:31.636
<v Speaker 1>And it's a very funny view he had. He's sort

0:39:31.636 --> 0:39:34.556
<v Speaker 1>of in his mind in his judgment of people, he

0:39:34.676 --> 0:39:38.676
<v Speaker 1>sort of punishes them for having any experience. He prefers

0:39:38.756 --> 0:39:41.876
<v Speaker 1>people without experience who are just thinking about problems from

0:39:41.916 --> 0:39:44.556
<v Speaker 1>the ground up, because he thinks of experience as kind

0:39:44.596 --> 0:39:48.436
<v Speaker 1>of almost polluting their judgment. And what older people have,

0:39:48.476 --> 0:39:51.436
<v Speaker 1>they have experience. But yes, if you twist the dial

0:39:51.476 --> 0:39:55.076
<v Speaker 1>on Sam Bangner Freed's risk tolerance just a little bit, yes,

0:39:55.156 --> 0:39:57.036
<v Speaker 1>there's like an army of accountants who are there at

0:39:57.036 --> 0:39:59.076
<v Speaker 1>the beginning and the money is put in the right place,

0:39:59.116 --> 0:40:01.956
<v Speaker 1>and so he's never tempted to use it, and he

0:40:02.036 --> 0:40:04.836
<v Speaker 1>was pursuing a strategy which was probably viable, which was

0:40:04.876 --> 0:40:08.956
<v Speaker 1>to be the legit crypto exchange, acquiring licenses left and right.

0:40:09.116 --> 0:40:11.356
<v Speaker 1>They were growing fast. There was a billion dollars in

0:40:11.396 --> 0:40:13.076
<v Speaker 1>revenue even the year they collapsed.

0:40:14.716 --> 0:40:18.116
<v Speaker 2>One of the few adults in Sam bankman Fried's life

0:40:18.156 --> 0:40:20.756
<v Speaker 2>was a man named George Lerner. He had been Bankman

0:40:20.796 --> 0:40:27.516
<v Speaker 2>Freed's psychiatrist in California. Here's a passage from Going Infinite.

0:40:27.556 --> 0:40:30.316
<v Speaker 1>Sam had long since decided that any discussions about his

0:40:30.316 --> 0:40:34.756
<v Speaker 1>inner life and its consequences for others were futile. The

0:40:34.836 --> 0:40:38.676
<v Speaker 1>social stuff was basically unsolvable. He said, he didn't need

0:40:38.756 --> 0:40:41.516
<v Speaker 1>a therapist to deal with his problems, though he did

0:40:41.596 --> 0:40:45.436
<v Speaker 1>need someone who could prescribe his medications. The problems that

0:40:45.516 --> 0:40:49.876
<v Speaker 1>interested Sam were other people's problems. He soon figured out

0:40:49.916 --> 0:40:52.076
<v Speaker 1>that George could be extremely useful with these.

0:40:52.676 --> 0:40:56.716
<v Speaker 2>And so bankman Fried hired George Lerner and imported him

0:40:56.756 --> 0:40:59.796
<v Speaker 2>to the Bahamas, where he took on a new role

0:40:59.996 --> 0:41:03.196
<v Speaker 2>as a sort of internal consultant at FTX.

0:41:03.636 --> 0:41:05.796
<v Speaker 1>A few months into his new job, George has seen

0:41:05.876 --> 0:41:10.076
<v Speaker 1>one hundred of ftx's three hundred something employees he enjoyed

0:41:10.076 --> 0:41:13.156
<v Speaker 1>maybe the single best view of its corporate architecture, with

0:41:13.236 --> 0:41:18.076
<v Speaker 1>a clarity not available to its investors, its customers, its employees,

0:41:18.596 --> 0:41:22.036
<v Speaker 1>and possibly the person who had created it. In the end,

0:41:22.476 --> 0:41:25.516
<v Speaker 1>George drew up the only internal org chart ever made

0:41:25.516 --> 0:41:29.356
<v Speaker 1>of Sam's sprawling creation. By the time he was done,

0:41:29.636 --> 0:41:34.156
<v Speaker 1>he discovered many interesting things. Twenty four different people thought

0:41:34.196 --> 0:41:37.956
<v Speaker 1>they were reporting directly to Sam. For example, this group

0:41:37.996 --> 0:41:41.956
<v Speaker 1>did not include the chief financial officer because FTX did

0:41:41.956 --> 0:41:45.156
<v Speaker 1>not have a chief financial officer. There was no chief

0:41:45.236 --> 0:41:48.876
<v Speaker 1>risk officer or head of human resources because they had

0:41:48.916 --> 0:41:53.476
<v Speaker 1>none of that either. Then there was Caroline Ellison. Caroline

0:41:53.556 --> 0:41:56.116
<v Speaker 1>was apparently alone in charge of the twenty two traders

0:41:56.116 --> 0:41:58.476
<v Speaker 1>and developers working inside Alometer Research.

0:42:01.156 --> 0:42:04.636
<v Speaker 2>I wanted to ask you about George Lerner. I realized

0:42:04.676 --> 0:42:08.436
<v Speaker 2>that his medical license wasn't valid in the Bahamas, so

0:42:08.476 --> 0:42:11.556
<v Speaker 2>he wasn't at officially as a psychiatrist when he was

0:42:12.356 --> 0:42:16.036
<v Speaker 2>talking to all these people, and therefore these conversations may

0:42:16.076 --> 0:42:20.756
<v Speaker 2>not have been protected under doctor patient confidentiality. Still, I

0:42:20.796 --> 0:42:23.476
<v Speaker 2>am curious why he was willing and able to tell

0:42:23.556 --> 0:42:26.916
<v Speaker 2>you so much about these private conversations.

0:42:27.196 --> 0:42:29.436
<v Speaker 1>I would be a very poor journalist if I ask

0:42:29.556 --> 0:42:31.476
<v Speaker 1>people why they were talking to me. But I will

0:42:31.516 --> 0:42:33.836
<v Speaker 1>tell you this that I knew I had a goal

0:42:33.956 --> 0:42:38.156
<v Speaker 1>mine because he's very smart. He was very insightful. His

0:42:38.236 --> 0:42:42.156
<v Speaker 1>first effective altruist patient was Sam's little brother, then Caroline Ellison,

0:42:42.436 --> 0:42:44.676
<v Speaker 1>and only after a while did Sam become a patient.

0:42:44.996 --> 0:42:47.276
<v Speaker 1>But by the time I meet him, he is serving

0:42:47.316 --> 0:42:51.396
<v Speaker 1>as essentially the psychiatrist to the entire company in the Bahamas.

0:42:51.436 --> 0:42:53.476
<v Speaker 1>They're rolling through his office, laying on his couch and

0:42:53.476 --> 0:42:56.476
<v Speaker 1>complaining about the company. The Bahamas didn't give him a license,

0:42:56.516 --> 0:42:59.516
<v Speaker 1>so at that point he really was just a whatever

0:42:59.596 --> 0:43:03.356
<v Speaker 1>professional coach, and so he wasn't bound by any laws

0:43:03.396 --> 0:43:06.636
<v Speaker 1>of confidentiality. But I never asked him.

0:43:07.676 --> 0:43:11.836
<v Speaker 2>Caroline Ellison, who by twenty twenty two was running Alameda,

0:43:12.276 --> 0:43:15.956
<v Speaker 2>was also Sam Bankman Fried's on again, off again girlfriend.

0:43:16.836 --> 0:43:21.196
<v Speaker 2>During the collapse of FTX, they were off and barely speaking.

0:43:22.156 --> 0:43:26.076
<v Speaker 2>It's tempting to wonder how things might have unwound differently

0:43:26.236 --> 0:43:29.276
<v Speaker 2>if either a they had been speaking at the time,

0:43:29.676 --> 0:43:33.676
<v Speaker 2>or b if Sam Bankman Freed had built an operation

0:43:33.796 --> 0:43:38.316
<v Speaker 2>that didn't revolve around himself and just three other people

0:43:38.356 --> 0:43:43.476
<v Speaker 2>who were the closest approximation he had to friends Caroline Ellison,

0:43:43.596 --> 0:43:47.676
<v Speaker 2>Gary Wang, and Nishad Singh, all three of whom, by

0:43:47.756 --> 0:43:52.356
<v Speaker 2>the way, would testify against him at trial. It took

0:43:52.476 --> 0:43:55.596
<v Speaker 2>the jury just four hours to convict him and seven

0:43:55.636 --> 0:44:00.196
<v Speaker 2>counts of fraud and conspiracy. After the break, Michael Lewis

0:44:00.316 --> 0:44:04.276
<v Speaker 2>attended the trial. It was how to put this, It

0:44:04.396 --> 0:44:08.876
<v Speaker 2>was no moneyball. I'm Stephen Dubner. This is freakonomics. Radio

0:44:09.196 --> 0:44:32.156
<v Speaker 2>be right back. The trial of Sam Bankman Freed began

0:44:32.276 --> 0:44:35.796
<v Speaker 2>on October third in the US District Court in Lower Manhattan.

0:44:36.436 --> 0:44:39.396
<v Speaker 2>The lead up to the trial felt a bit like

0:44:39.556 --> 0:44:43.796
<v Speaker 2>the lead up to a Super Bowl, two teams ready

0:44:43.876 --> 0:44:50.436
<v Speaker 2>for a tense and exciting battle. Instead, it was a blowout.

0:44:51.116 --> 0:44:55.916
<v Speaker 2>Every day it got a bit less exciting, a bit sadder.

0:44:56.756 --> 0:45:01.236
<v Speaker 2>Bankman Freed's closest colleagues turned against him. The jury heard

0:45:01.516 --> 0:45:05.556
<v Speaker 2>a steady stream of obviously incriminating evidence, and when Bankman

0:45:05.596 --> 0:45:09.916
<v Speaker 2>Freed himself took the stand, there just wasn't much there there.

0:45:10.516 --> 0:45:13.956
<v Speaker 2>He frequently said he couldn't recall saying things that others

0:45:13.996 --> 0:45:16.476
<v Speaker 2>had said he said, and that he couldn't recall doing

0:45:16.596 --> 0:45:19.516
<v Speaker 2>things that wouldn't seem at all hard to recall. If

0:45:19.556 --> 0:45:23.556
<v Speaker 2>you were the person doing them. Michael Lewis attended this

0:45:23.636 --> 0:45:24.836
<v Speaker 2>portion of the trial.

0:45:25.356 --> 0:45:27.876
<v Speaker 1>I knew that Sam Bangnerfried marched to the beat of

0:45:27.916 --> 0:45:30.876
<v Speaker 1>his own drum, that he was his own peculiar person,

0:45:30.916 --> 0:45:33.716
<v Speaker 1>with his own peculiar motives for doing these peculiar things

0:45:33.716 --> 0:45:35.076
<v Speaker 1>that he did, and this would have made him such

0:45:35.076 --> 0:45:38.596
<v Speaker 1>an interesting character to write about. I thought, if he

0:45:38.676 --> 0:45:41.796
<v Speaker 1>was going to take the witness stand, he would have

0:45:41.916 --> 0:45:46.836
<v Speaker 1>some strategy, some reason for doing it, and it was

0:45:47.196 --> 0:45:48.356
<v Speaker 1>that was a big mistake.

0:45:48.916 --> 0:45:52.556
<v Speaker 2>So you were not called as a witness in the trial, which,

0:45:52.676 --> 0:45:54.916
<v Speaker 2>I'll be honest surprised me a little bit. Did it

0:45:54.916 --> 0:45:55.476
<v Speaker 2>surprise you.

0:45:56.116 --> 0:45:59.356
<v Speaker 1>My sense is that lawyers are risk averse and they

0:45:59.396 --> 0:46:01.676
<v Speaker 1>don't like to put on the witness stand people they

0:46:01.676 --> 0:46:02.876
<v Speaker 1>can't completely control.

0:46:03.316 --> 0:46:05.036
<v Speaker 2>And why can't you be controlled? Michael?

0:46:05.356 --> 0:46:07.956
<v Speaker 1>The problem is the prosecutors asked me some questions and

0:46:07.956 --> 0:46:09.956
<v Speaker 1>I'd say some things that were pretty damning about Sam,

0:46:09.996 --> 0:46:12.076
<v Speaker 1>but it would open me up to the defense and

0:46:12.076 --> 0:46:14.356
<v Speaker 1>they'd say, I don't know, when you met him, did

0:46:14.356 --> 0:46:16.316
<v Speaker 1>you think he was dishonest? No, I didn't think he

0:46:16.356 --> 0:46:18.956
<v Speaker 1>was dishonest. When men him, I thought he was curiously forthright,

0:46:19.276 --> 0:46:22.036
<v Speaker 1>you know whatever, it was, and I saw this with

0:46:22.116 --> 0:46:25.796
<v Speaker 1>another witness. The prosecution to teed up a person whose

0:46:25.796 --> 0:46:29.036
<v Speaker 1>title was head of product. His name was Ramnik Aurora,

0:46:29.396 --> 0:46:32.916
<v Speaker 1>who was actually Sam's right hand man in making lots

0:46:32.956 --> 0:46:35.076
<v Speaker 1>of the venture capital investments. He didn't have anything to

0:46:35.116 --> 0:46:37.276
<v Speaker 1>do with the product, but he had had his plane ticket,

0:46:37.316 --> 0:46:39.596
<v Speaker 1>he had his hotel room. He thought he was testifying

0:46:39.716 --> 0:46:43.236
<v Speaker 1>right after Nashad Sing and they canceled him last minute.

0:46:43.676 --> 0:46:45.756
<v Speaker 1>And I think I could be wrong about this. It's

0:46:45.756 --> 0:46:47.716
<v Speaker 1>possible to cancel me because he just decided they didn't

0:46:47.756 --> 0:46:50.116
<v Speaker 1>need him. But I think between the time they teed

0:46:50.196 --> 0:46:52.196
<v Speaker 1>him up and the time they called him, they read

0:46:52.236 --> 0:46:55.076
<v Speaker 1>my book and they saw that he presented the same

0:46:55.156 --> 0:46:58.156
<v Speaker 1>kind of problem I would present, because yes, he could

0:46:58.156 --> 0:47:00.556
<v Speaker 1>tell you about how Sam continued to spend lots of

0:47:00.596 --> 0:47:02.836
<v Speaker 1>money even after he should have been aware that he

0:47:02.876 --> 0:47:05.876
<v Speaker 1>was spending the customer's money. But there's this moment in

0:47:05.916 --> 0:47:07.916
<v Speaker 1>the book that I think is very revealing. And they

0:47:07.916 --> 0:47:10.916
<v Speaker 1>didn't get any attention to the trial. When it all

0:47:10.956 --> 0:47:15.036
<v Speaker 1>blows up in early November of last year and Caroline

0:47:15.036 --> 0:47:17.876
<v Speaker 1>Ellison and Sam Bankman Freedom and a Shad Singer and

0:47:17.916 --> 0:47:20.156
<v Speaker 1>Gary Wang or interroom trying to figure out how much

0:47:20.196 --> 0:47:23.356
<v Speaker 1>money they have to give customers their deposits back, and

0:47:23.516 --> 0:47:26.156
<v Speaker 1>they call Romnick over, and Romick walks into the room

0:47:26.356 --> 0:47:28.756
<v Speaker 1>and he says, they are literally like trying to figure

0:47:28.756 --> 0:47:31.276
<v Speaker 1>out which exchanges they have accounts on where do they

0:47:31.316 --> 0:47:34.796
<v Speaker 1>have bank accounts? And Roomick's phone rings and it's from

0:47:34.876 --> 0:47:37.676
<v Speaker 1>a bank delf Tech in Bahamas, and the guy is

0:47:37.716 --> 0:47:39.356
<v Speaker 1>on the other a line says to Romnick. He says,

0:47:39.356 --> 0:47:40.956
<v Speaker 1>I see you guys in trouble. You should know you

0:47:40.996 --> 0:47:42.956
<v Speaker 1>have you have an account here with three hundred million

0:47:42.996 --> 0:47:45.356
<v Speaker 1>dollars if you need it. And Ramick says this to them,

0:47:45.396 --> 0:47:47.636
<v Speaker 1>and none of them have any idea of it, and

0:47:47.716 --> 0:47:50.756
<v Speaker 1>the pure chaos of the thing again, it's like a

0:47:50.796 --> 0:47:53.276
<v Speaker 1>witness who has when you've been that close. You have

0:47:53.316 --> 0:47:55.476
<v Speaker 1>evidence for both sides, and neither side wants you to

0:47:55.516 --> 0:47:56.396
<v Speaker 1>hear both sides.

0:47:56.836 --> 0:47:59.756
<v Speaker 2>So as you're describing, it strikes me that what you

0:47:59.956 --> 0:48:04.516
<v Speaker 2>have is just a different category of information than the

0:48:04.636 --> 0:48:06.796
<v Speaker 2>kind of information that is useful at a trial for

0:48:06.876 --> 0:48:10.916
<v Speaker 2>either side. Let's say, yes, that's true, but it also

0:48:11.516 --> 0:48:13.836
<v Speaker 2>it just makes me wonder what it's like for you.

0:48:13.836 --> 0:48:17.156
<v Speaker 2>You were sitting here watching a live criminal trial that

0:48:17.316 --> 0:48:20.716
<v Speaker 2>is essentially based on a book that you wrote. We've

0:48:20.756 --> 0:48:22.316
<v Speaker 2>all heard what it's like to write a book and

0:48:22.316 --> 0:48:25.516
<v Speaker 2>then see the movie based on it, and you've had

0:48:25.556 --> 0:48:28.716
<v Speaker 2>more experience with that than most people. And the expectation

0:48:29.476 --> 0:48:32.236
<v Speaker 2>is that the movie will, of course be very different

0:48:32.236 --> 0:48:36.356
<v Speaker 2>from the book. But this was differently different. So what

0:48:36.516 --> 0:48:37.556
<v Speaker 2>was the experience like?

0:48:37.876 --> 0:48:40.476
<v Speaker 1>It's funny you draw that analogy, because it was similar

0:48:40.556 --> 0:48:43.396
<v Speaker 1>in this way. When someone takes one of your books

0:48:43.396 --> 0:48:46.036
<v Speaker 1>and turns it into a movie, they compress it, they

0:48:46.076 --> 0:48:48.196
<v Speaker 1>distort it, and they compress it, and you just hope

0:48:48.196 --> 0:48:50.596
<v Speaker 1>they don't lose the spirit of it. Right, They're turning

0:48:50.636 --> 0:48:53.156
<v Speaker 1>one hundred thousand words into an eight thousand words script,

0:48:53.196 --> 0:48:55.556
<v Speaker 1>so they're bound to leave all kinds of stuff out,

0:48:55.676 --> 0:48:57.836
<v Speaker 1>and you hope when you watch it feels the way

0:48:58.676 --> 0:49:00.316
<v Speaker 1>you felt when you wrote the Thing.

0:49:00.836 --> 0:49:03.116
<v Speaker 2>And the movies that have been made from your books,

0:49:03.156 --> 0:49:06.636
<v Speaker 2>like The Big Short, Moneyball, The blind Side, I gather

0:49:07.236 --> 0:49:10.476
<v Speaker 2>that from your perspective, those were successfully done.

0:49:10.556 --> 0:49:13.356
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I felt in each case that more or less

0:49:13.356 --> 0:49:15.996
<v Speaker 1>the spirit of the thing was preserved and the movies

0:49:16.036 --> 0:49:19.076
<v Speaker 1>weren't boring. In the trial, I felt the spirit of

0:49:19.116 --> 0:49:21.956
<v Speaker 1>the thing was more distorted than the movies distorted. And

0:49:22.116 --> 0:49:25.716
<v Speaker 1>also the thing that was striking in the trial. We

0:49:25.836 --> 0:49:28.276
<v Speaker 1>take it for granted in our legal system, these plea

0:49:28.316 --> 0:49:32.116
<v Speaker 1>bargaining agreements, they're essentially corrupt. I mean, they're very useful

0:49:32.196 --> 0:49:34.956
<v Speaker 1>tools for prosecutors, but essentially the prosecutors are able to

0:49:34.996 --> 0:49:37.756
<v Speaker 1>pay people with years of their lives to say stuff

0:49:37.756 --> 0:49:40.876
<v Speaker 1>on a witness stand so long as it's not falsifiable,

0:49:41.316 --> 0:49:43.756
<v Speaker 1>if it serves the purpose of the prosecutors, they get

0:49:43.756 --> 0:49:44.596
<v Speaker 1>rewarded for it.

0:49:44.996 --> 0:49:46.116
<v Speaker 2>What's it for instance? Here?

0:49:46.716 --> 0:49:50.116
<v Speaker 1>For instance here is it was a pretty common pattern

0:49:50.196 --> 0:49:54.196
<v Speaker 1>in the three principal witnesses was how they felt at

0:49:54.236 --> 0:50:00.516
<v Speaker 1>the time. Nishad saying was telling a story about how

0:50:00.636 --> 0:50:04.596
<v Speaker 1>dark and miserable he was a year ago, and that

0:50:04.676 --> 0:50:08.156
<v Speaker 1>he was aware that they were doing wrong things. And

0:50:08.436 --> 0:50:11.236
<v Speaker 1>I interview this an up and down. He was giddy

0:50:11.276 --> 0:50:13.396
<v Speaker 1>with how things were going, and he would say things

0:50:13.476 --> 0:50:16.116
<v Speaker 1>to me. I mean, in the book, he says, back

0:50:16.156 --> 0:50:18.756
<v Speaker 1>in twenty eighteen, when he's twenty one years old and

0:50:18.876 --> 0:50:21.836
<v Speaker 1>joining Sam Banknerfried in the crypto trading firm, he says,

0:50:21.876 --> 0:50:24.516
<v Speaker 1>how quickly he figures out that the law isn't what's

0:50:24.516 --> 0:50:26.116
<v Speaker 1>written in the laws which you can get away with

0:50:26.156 --> 0:50:28.236
<v Speaker 1>and which you can't get away with. He's saying things

0:50:28.236 --> 0:50:30.436
<v Speaker 1>to me that you don't say if you're feeling at

0:50:30.476 --> 0:50:33.156
<v Speaker 1>all worried that people are going to suspect you're doing

0:50:33.236 --> 0:50:37.676
<v Speaker 1>a bad thing. So they were able to misremember their

0:50:37.716 --> 0:50:41.036
<v Speaker 1>states of mind, and the states of mind they described

0:50:41.116 --> 0:50:44.956
<v Speaker 1>themselves having been in were alien to anybody who observed

0:50:44.956 --> 0:50:45.796
<v Speaker 1>them at the time.

0:50:46.236 --> 0:50:49.396
<v Speaker 2>Were you really surprised that there is that trade off

0:50:49.436 --> 0:50:51.236
<v Speaker 2>for sort of bribing as you're describing it.

0:50:51.636 --> 0:50:53.996
<v Speaker 1>Well, I knew it existed, right, It was just watching

0:50:54.036 --> 0:50:56.356
<v Speaker 1>the effects of it. You know, we get our legal

0:50:56.396 --> 0:50:58.556
<v Speaker 1>system from the English, and the English are shocked we

0:50:58.596 --> 0:51:02.036
<v Speaker 1>allow this. It's not obvious that we should. It was

0:51:02.116 --> 0:51:04.756
<v Speaker 1>viewed as corrupt until not that long ago. It's now

0:51:04.796 --> 0:51:08.116
<v Speaker 1>just bewoven into the texture of our criminal justice process.

0:51:08.516 --> 0:51:10.276
<v Speaker 1>If I was sitting in the jury box, I would

0:51:10.316 --> 0:51:13.796
<v Speaker 1>certainly have convicted. But when you back away from it

0:51:13.996 --> 0:51:18.156
<v Speaker 1>and you see just how uneven the playing field is

0:51:18.676 --> 0:51:22.876
<v Speaker 1>between the prosecutors in the defense. The prosecutors have unlimited resources.

0:51:22.996 --> 0:51:26.876
<v Speaker 1>They have power to scare people into testifying. They getting

0:51:26.876 --> 0:51:29.556
<v Speaker 1>cut plea deals with people. You see why the stats

0:51:29.596 --> 0:51:30.796
<v Speaker 1>are as shocking as they are.

0:51:31.196 --> 0:51:33.316
<v Speaker 2>You mean the conviction stats.

0:51:33.356 --> 0:51:36.196
<v Speaker 1>Last year, ninety nine point six percent of the people

0:51:36.356 --> 0:51:39.956
<v Speaker 1>who were charged with federal crimes either pled guilty or convicted.

0:51:40.396 --> 0:51:45.076
<v Speaker 2>So why did bankman Fried testify himself when so many

0:51:45.116 --> 0:51:47.836
<v Speaker 2>of his answers were essentially I don't recall.

0:51:48.156 --> 0:51:51.116
<v Speaker 1>It's a great question, go back even further, knowing what

0:51:51.196 --> 0:51:55.076
<v Speaker 1>he supposedly knew. Why did he stay in the Bahamas

0:51:55.076 --> 0:51:56.676
<v Speaker 1>when it all fell apart? If you just gone to

0:51:56.716 --> 0:51:58.916
<v Speaker 1>Dubai still be there, did.

0:51:58.756 --> 0:52:00.076
<v Speaker 2>You ask him that why he stayed?

0:52:00.516 --> 0:52:02.276
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, yeah, I mean I can tell you what

0:52:02.316 --> 0:52:04.636
<v Speaker 1>he said. He said because I didn't do anything wrong.

0:52:05.116 --> 0:52:06.876
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you wanted the answer to all those

0:52:06.956 --> 0:52:09.636
<v Speaker 1>questions is because he thinks he did nothing wrong. He

0:52:09.676 --> 0:52:13.236
<v Speaker 1>thinks that his error was not paying attention. That's the

0:52:13.316 --> 0:52:16.876
<v Speaker 1>story he's told himself. The prosecutors, I think, were maybe

0:52:16.916 --> 0:52:19.236
<v Speaker 1>a little surprised by just how well their case went,

0:52:19.716 --> 0:52:22.156
<v Speaker 1>because there was in the summing up when they were

0:52:22.156 --> 0:52:24.476
<v Speaker 1>making the argument to the jury about why they needed

0:52:24.476 --> 0:52:26.876
<v Speaker 1>to convict they said, even if you believe this guy,

0:52:27.516 --> 0:52:29.836
<v Speaker 1>believe that he just wasn't paying attention to this eight

0:52:29.836 --> 0:52:33.156
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars that he took from the customers and used

0:52:33.156 --> 0:52:36.636
<v Speaker 1>in his private fund. There's this idea called conscious avoidance,

0:52:37.196 --> 0:52:39.156
<v Speaker 1>and that doesn't let you off a hook if you

0:52:39.236 --> 0:52:42.876
<v Speaker 1>just didn't pay attention. But I think Sam, I think

0:52:43.036 --> 0:52:45.516
<v Speaker 1>the simple way to explain all his behavior is his

0:52:45.556 --> 0:52:48.036
<v Speaker 1>animate in his own mind, that he didn't do anything wrong.

0:52:48.436 --> 0:52:53.076
<v Speaker 2>I'm curious to know what you learned, if anything, at

0:52:53.076 --> 0:52:55.596
<v Speaker 2>the trial, but especially I want to know what you

0:52:56.596 --> 0:52:58.556
<v Speaker 2>thought you might learn at the trial, and whether you

0:52:58.596 --> 0:52:59.236
<v Speaker 2>did or didn't.

0:52:59.756 --> 0:53:02.196
<v Speaker 1>There were a couple of things that I really wanted

0:53:02.236 --> 0:53:05.436
<v Speaker 1>to know that in retrospect, maybe the trial wasn't the

0:53:05.436 --> 0:53:06.836
<v Speaker 1>best way to get it. But if he can't get

0:53:06.876 --> 0:53:08.196
<v Speaker 1>at it through the trial, I don't know where you're

0:53:08.196 --> 0:53:10.556
<v Speaker 1>going to get at it through. I really did want

0:53:10.596 --> 0:53:15.756
<v Speaker 1>to know the moment when the sum total of liquid

0:53:15.796 --> 0:53:21.036
<v Speaker 1>assets in Sam's world combination Alameda and FTX was less

0:53:21.116 --> 0:53:24.236
<v Speaker 1>than the customer deposits, Like when did he go negative?

0:53:24.276 --> 0:53:26.156
<v Speaker 2>There is that a knowable fact.

0:53:26.596 --> 0:53:29.756
<v Speaker 1>It could be figured out. The bankruptcy people might know already.

0:53:30.316 --> 0:53:34.796
<v Speaker 1>Wind should have everyone had alarm bells ringing in their heads,

0:53:35.676 --> 0:53:37.876
<v Speaker 1>because I didn't see any sign of alarm bells ringing

0:53:37.916 --> 0:53:40.556
<v Speaker 1>in anybody's head until it blew up. There's another thing.

0:53:41.156 --> 0:53:43.916
<v Speaker 1>When it all fell apart, I was doing this crude

0:53:43.956 --> 0:53:46.956
<v Speaker 1>exercise of figuring out all the money that had come

0:53:46.956 --> 0:53:49.076
<v Speaker 1>into Sam's world and all the money that had left

0:53:49.116 --> 0:53:52.196
<v Speaker 1>it in the form of customer deposits or venture capital

0:53:52.236 --> 0:53:57.276
<v Speaker 1>investments or expenditure on political campaigns. And to this day

0:53:57.316 --> 0:54:00.156
<v Speaker 1>this still seems to me several billion dollars that I

0:54:00.196 --> 0:54:02.836
<v Speaker 1>can't figure out where they went. There's been some hand

0:54:02.876 --> 0:54:06.756
<v Speaker 1>wavy explanations about how it might have been lost. I'm

0:54:06.796 --> 0:54:08.796
<v Speaker 1>not sure it has been lost. It's possible. The bankruptcy

0:54:08.796 --> 0:54:11.716
<v Speaker 1>people still finding literally finding money the way you find

0:54:11.756 --> 0:54:12.676
<v Speaker 1>easter eggs.

0:54:14.916 --> 0:54:18.916
<v Speaker 2>These bankruptcy people are being led by John Ray, who

0:54:18.996 --> 0:54:22.516
<v Speaker 2>was installed as the emergency CEO of FTX by the

0:54:22.596 --> 0:54:26.316
<v Speaker 2>law firm Sullivan and Cromwell. We had Ray on the

0:54:26.316 --> 0:54:29.716
<v Speaker 2>show earlier this year talking about the singular challenge of

0:54:29.796 --> 0:54:34.076
<v Speaker 2>taking over FTX. That was episode five sixty. We called it,

0:54:34.236 --> 0:54:37.996
<v Speaker 2>is this the worst job in Corporate America? Or maybe

0:54:38.116 --> 0:54:42.236
<v Speaker 2>the best. Here's what Michael Lewis wrote about John Ray

0:54:42.436 --> 0:54:45.356
<v Speaker 2>and the process by which he came to replace Sam

0:54:45.396 --> 0:54:47.116
<v Speaker 2>Bankman Freed as CEO.

0:54:50.396 --> 0:54:53.276
<v Speaker 1>The Wild and wonderful world of US corporate bankruptcy was

0:54:53.316 --> 0:54:56.356
<v Speaker 1>increasingly dominated by big law firms, but there were still

0:54:56.396 --> 0:54:59.196
<v Speaker 1>a few of these lone actors like Ray, who played

0:54:59.196 --> 0:55:02.196
<v Speaker 1>the role of wildcatters. The law firms brought in the

0:55:02.196 --> 0:55:05.116
<v Speaker 1>wildcatter to take over as CEO of the failed firm,

0:55:05.716 --> 0:55:09.356
<v Speaker 1>and the wildcatter in turn hired the law firms as

0:55:09.356 --> 0:55:11.636
<v Speaker 1>a legal matter. At four point thirty in the morning

0:55:11.636 --> 0:55:15.556
<v Speaker 1>on Friday, November eleventh, twenty twenty two, Sam Bank and

0:55:15.596 --> 0:55:20.116
<v Speaker 1>freed Docu signed FTX into bankruptcy and named John Ray

0:55:20.156 --> 0:55:24.516
<v Speaker 1>as ftx's new CEO. As a practical matter, Sullivan and

0:55:24.596 --> 0:55:26.956
<v Speaker 1>Cromwell lined up John Ray to replace Sam as the

0:55:26.996 --> 0:55:31.236
<v Speaker 1>CEO of FTX, and then John Ray hired Sullivan Cromwell

0:55:31.356 --> 0:55:35.796
<v Speaker 1>as the lawyers for the massive bankruptcy. I mean, the

0:55:35.836 --> 0:55:38.916
<v Speaker 1>problem with the bankruptcy process is that it's designed to

0:55:38.956 --> 0:55:41.516
<v Speaker 1>maximize the number of billable hours. It's designed to go

0:55:41.556 --> 0:55:43.476
<v Speaker 1>on forever and ever and ever, and it's going to

0:55:43.516 --> 0:55:45.196
<v Speaker 1>cost a billion dollars. It's crazy.

0:55:45.716 --> 0:55:48.276
<v Speaker 2>Is that more on Ray or more in Solivon Cromwell

0:55:48.356 --> 0:55:49.676
<v Speaker 2>or just the way the system works.

0:55:50.076 --> 0:55:51.916
<v Speaker 1>The way the system works, the system's nuts.

0:55:52.356 --> 0:55:53.916
<v Speaker 2>What would you propose instead.

0:55:54.316 --> 0:55:56.196
<v Speaker 1>I think that needs to be a regulator. At the moment,

0:55:56.236 --> 0:55:59.356
<v Speaker 1>there's no oversight. They is someone call the bankruptcy trustee,

0:55:59.356 --> 0:56:01.716
<v Speaker 1>who's an employee of the Department of Justice, who has

0:56:01.756 --> 0:56:04.596
<v Speaker 1>no teeth, his ability to write angry letters to the judge,

0:56:04.636 --> 0:56:07.956
<v Speaker 1>and he has saying it's outrageous how this is being run.

0:56:08.116 --> 0:56:09.556
<v Speaker 1>But the judge can just ignore it.

0:56:10.076 --> 0:56:12.316
<v Speaker 2>Now that you've seen the trial, if you had to

0:56:12.316 --> 0:56:14.276
<v Speaker 2>write the book over again, what would you do different?

0:56:14.716 --> 0:56:16.476
<v Speaker 1>The one thing I would have loved to have known.

0:56:17.156 --> 0:56:20.476
<v Speaker 1>I love the idea in their pillow talk of Sam

0:56:20.596 --> 0:56:22.876
<v Speaker 1>saying to Caroline that there was a five percent chance

0:56:22.916 --> 0:56:25.516
<v Speaker 1>he would be president of the United States. I feel

0:56:25.556 --> 0:56:27.636
<v Speaker 1>like I was robbed of material.

0:56:28.276 --> 0:56:31.276
<v Speaker 2>One more reason I'm just thinking now about why the

0:56:31.316 --> 0:56:35.316
<v Speaker 2>book got a different reception than one might have anticipated

0:56:35.916 --> 0:56:37.796
<v Speaker 2>is because it came out around the same time as

0:56:37.836 --> 0:56:42.436
<v Speaker 2>Walter Isaacson's bio of Elon Musk, and Walter gets to

0:56:42.476 --> 0:56:45.476
<v Speaker 2>spend a lot of time with his subjects, also living subjects.

0:56:45.476 --> 0:56:48.556
<v Speaker 2>At least. I haven't read Walter's book, but my read

0:56:48.596 --> 0:56:53.516
<v Speaker 2>of the reviews is that he praises Musk's accomplishments while

0:56:53.796 --> 0:56:56.596
<v Speaker 2>laying out the ways in which personally he's kind of

0:56:56.596 --> 0:56:59.796
<v Speaker 2>an asshole, and Musk is still the richest guy in

0:56:59.836 --> 0:57:02.076
<v Speaker 2>the world and at the top of his game. Sam

0:57:02.156 --> 0:57:05.356
<v Speaker 2>had been defenestrated by the time the book came out,

0:57:05.716 --> 0:57:08.076
<v Speaker 2>And I wonder if maybe I don't know, it's the

0:57:08.156 --> 0:57:10.676
<v Speaker 2>right kind of target for the right kind of times,

0:57:10.716 --> 0:57:12.916
<v Speaker 2>and you didn't shoot an arrow through that target.

0:57:13.276 --> 0:57:16.236
<v Speaker 1>Well, I can't write it any other way than it was.

0:57:16.476 --> 0:57:19.076
<v Speaker 1>It would have been bizarre to try to pretend that

0:57:19.156 --> 0:57:22.956
<v Speaker 1>Sam Bangertfried was obviously evil to everybody around him. It

0:57:22.996 --> 0:57:26.236
<v Speaker 1>would have failed to grapple with why all these people

0:57:26.916 --> 0:57:32.716
<v Speaker 1>got the smartest fetcher. Capitalists, important politicians, celebrities are enthralled

0:57:32.716 --> 0:57:37.196
<v Speaker 1>by him. How stupid would it be not to create

0:57:37.356 --> 0:57:41.596
<v Speaker 1>some of the charm that led him finding himself in

0:57:41.636 --> 0:57:42.596
<v Speaker 1>the position he was in.

0:57:45.556 --> 0:57:50.196
<v Speaker 2>There is a particularly revealing scene, particularly sad scene, toward

0:57:50.276 --> 0:57:55.076
<v Speaker 2>the end of Lewis's book. This happens after FTX had cratered,

0:57:55.196 --> 0:57:59.196
<v Speaker 2>but before bankman Freed had been arrested, and even though

0:57:59.236 --> 0:58:02.756
<v Speaker 2>most of his employees had fled the Bahamas, he stayed on,

0:58:03.596 --> 0:58:08.116
<v Speaker 2>and so did Constance Wang, the chief operating officer of FTX.

0:58:08.276 --> 0:58:11.956
<v Speaker 2>She had been bankman and Freed's eighth higher Michael Lewis

0:58:12.036 --> 0:58:15.996
<v Speaker 2>was also in the Bahamas. Then here's what he writes.

0:58:18.036 --> 0:58:20.156
<v Speaker 1>For the better part of the month, I watched Constance

0:58:20.196 --> 0:58:23.916
<v Speaker 1>return from her encounters with Sam. Over and over. She

0:58:24.036 --> 0:58:27.076
<v Speaker 1>confronted Sam with the suffering he'd inflicted upon the very

0:58:27.116 --> 0:58:30.636
<v Speaker 1>people who'd been the most loyal to him. Most FTX

0:58:30.636 --> 0:58:34.836
<v Speaker 1>employees had lost their life savings. Some had lost their spouses,

0:58:34.876 --> 0:58:38.236
<v Speaker 1>their homes, their friends, and their good names. There were

0:58:38.236 --> 0:58:42.196
<v Speaker 1>Taiwanese employees of FTX still in Hong Kong who couldn't

0:58:42.196 --> 0:58:47.396
<v Speaker 1>afford plane tickets home. I asked, Sam said, Constance, when

0:58:47.436 --> 0:58:50.116
<v Speaker 1>you were doing this, have you ever thought how much

0:58:50.196 --> 0:58:53.636
<v Speaker 1>this event will be hurting people? Even here? However, she

0:58:53.676 --> 0:58:57.076
<v Speaker 1>found herself talking past Sam. In his telling he hadn't

0:58:57.076 --> 0:59:00.236
<v Speaker 1>realized how much risk he'd subjected others to without their permission.

0:59:01.196 --> 0:59:04.356
<v Speaker 1>Constance nevertheless sense that he didn't really register the damage

0:59:04.396 --> 0:59:06.996
<v Speaker 1>he'd caused to other people in the way that say

0:59:07.116 --> 0:59:12.556
<v Speaker 1>she might have as absolutely zero empathy. She said, that's

0:59:12.596 --> 0:59:16.076
<v Speaker 1>what I learned that I didn't know he can't feel anything.

0:59:19.316 --> 0:59:20.916
<v Speaker 2>So did Sam read your book?

0:59:21.316 --> 0:59:24.676
<v Speaker 1>I've not spoken to him since he was hauled off

0:59:24.676 --> 0:59:28.196
<v Speaker 1>to jail on August the eleventh. I was told by

0:59:28.236 --> 0:59:31.356
<v Speaker 1>his lawyers that they snuck it into him on a

0:59:31.596 --> 0:59:34.316
<v Speaker 1>drive that had all of the legal documents. But I

0:59:34.356 --> 0:59:36.076
<v Speaker 1>don't know what he thought about it. He's the one

0:59:36.076 --> 0:59:38.596
<v Speaker 1>person who hasn't ventured an opinion about my book.

0:59:41.196 --> 0:59:46.396
<v Speaker 2>What's your opinion? Our email is radio at freakonomics dot com.

0:59:46.636 --> 0:59:49.516
<v Speaker 2>The book is called Going Infinite, The Rise and Fall

0:59:49.556 --> 0:59:53.276
<v Speaker 2>of a New Tycoon by Michael Lewis. Freakonomics Radio is

0:59:53.276 --> 0:59:56.476
<v Speaker 2>produced by Stitcher and ren Bud Radio. This episode was

0:59:56.476 --> 1:00:00.356
<v Speaker 2>produced by Ryan Kelly. The excerpts you heard from Going

1:00:00.396 --> 1:00:03.076
<v Speaker 2>Infinite were read by the author, Michael Lewis, from an

1:00:03.116 --> 1:00:08.116
<v Speaker 2>audiobook produced by Audible Studios. Our staff also includes Elina Cullman, Eleanor,

1:00:08.156 --> 1:00:13.036
<v Speaker 2>Osborne Else, Hernandez Gabriel Roth, Greg Rippon, Jasmin Klinger, Jeremy Johnston,

1:00:13.116 --> 1:00:17.356
<v Speaker 2>Julie canfer Lyrick Boutitch, Morgan Levy, Neil Caruth, Rebecca Lee Douglas,

1:00:17.396 --> 1:00:20.716
<v Speaker 2>Sarah Lily, and Zach Klapinski. Our theme song is Mister

1:00:20.796 --> 1:00:23.356
<v Speaker 2>Fortune by The Hitchhikers. The rest of the music in

1:00:23.396 --> 1:00:26.716
<v Speaker 2>this episode was composed by Luis Gera Michael Riola, and

1:00:26.756 --> 1:00:30.596
<v Speaker 2>Stephen Ulrich. You can find our entire archive on any

1:00:30.636 --> 1:00:33.596
<v Speaker 2>podcast app or at freakonomics dot com, where we also

1:00:33.636 --> 1:00:37.876
<v Speaker 2>publish transcripts and show notes. As always, thanks for listening.

1:00:42.116 --> 1:00:44.516
<v Speaker 2>I have approximately a million more questions, but it is

1:00:44.636 --> 1:00:47.196
<v Speaker 2>one o'clock. You gotta go, I assume, yeah, yeah, I

1:00:47.236 --> 1:00:50.796
<v Speaker 2>do have to go. All right, this was fun, my hope,

1:00:50.796 --> 1:00:51.316
<v Speaker 2>it was fun.

1:00:56.076 --> 1:01:04.116
<v Speaker 3>The Freakonomics Radio Network, The Hidden Side of Everything, Stitcher,