WEBVTT - Tech News: Hacking a Tractor to Play Doom

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:11.800 --> 0:00:14.120
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:14.240 --> 0:00:17.200
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio.

0:00:17.239 --> 0:00:19.520
<v Speaker 1>And how the tech are you. It's time for the

0:00:19.520 --> 0:00:24.280
<v Speaker 1>tech news for August twenty two, and today we've got

0:00:24.320 --> 0:00:27.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of news items about hacking because def Con,

0:00:27.640 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>the hacker convention, was just this past weekend. But first

0:00:31.560 --> 0:00:35.160
<v Speaker 1>let's touch on some other news items. The advocacy group

0:00:35.240 --> 0:00:40.560
<v Speaker 1>Global Witness has leveled some pretty nasty accusations against Facebook.

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:44.159
<v Speaker 1>And I say accusations, but really it sounds like in

0:00:44.200 --> 0:00:48.240
<v Speaker 1>this case the group has a pretty open and shut argument. Now,

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:51.919
<v Speaker 1>this all has to do with some upcoming elections in Brazil,

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and I'm sure we're all aware of how Facebook has

0:00:55.680 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 1>been under scrutiny for a few years now for its

0:00:58.280 --> 0:01:02.880
<v Speaker 1>role in carrying and in some cases promoting misinformation, namely

0:01:02.920 --> 0:01:07.399
<v Speaker 1>through its recommendation algorithm in English speaking countries. But in

0:01:07.480 --> 0:01:10.959
<v Speaker 1>countries where the dominant language isn't English, this can be

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>even more of a problem. It can go unresolved. So

0:01:16.120 --> 0:01:19.520
<v Speaker 1>how does Global Witness know that Facebook has failed to

0:01:19.600 --> 0:01:23.039
<v Speaker 1>live up to its promised that the platform is quote

0:01:23.160 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>deeply committed to protecting election integrity end quote. When it

0:01:27.120 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>comes to Brazil, well, Global Witness created political ads and

0:01:32.560 --> 0:01:38.400
<v Speaker 1>they inserted outright misinformation into those political ads. Then Global

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Witness submitted those ads to Facebook, and Facebook accepted the

0:01:42.959 --> 0:01:47.080
<v Speaker 1>ads without raising any objections to the content inside them.

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:50.320
<v Speaker 1>The advocacy group included ads that listed the wrong date

0:01:50.640 --> 0:01:53.520
<v Speaker 1>for the elections. So these were ads that were targeted

0:01:53.600 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 1>towards specific populations in Brazil. So the concept here is

0:01:57.800 --> 0:02:01.160
<v Speaker 1>that you would be trying to miss need a specific

0:02:01.400 --> 0:02:05.200
<v Speaker 1>target demographic so that they would not participate in voting,

0:02:05.640 --> 0:02:08.360
<v Speaker 1>and you will give them the wrong date. There was

0:02:09.000 --> 0:02:11.840
<v Speaker 1>there were other ads that that called for people to

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:16.000
<v Speaker 1>use voting methods that aren't sanctioned by Brazil, so an

0:02:16.000 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 1>example that might be to vote by mail when there

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:22.760
<v Speaker 1>isn't a vote by mail option. Some of them even

0:02:22.800 --> 0:02:25.720
<v Speaker 1>called into question the validity of the election and the

0:02:25.760 --> 0:02:30.800
<v Speaker 1>election hasn't even happened yet, and Facebook accepted all of them,

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:34.600
<v Speaker 1>according to Global Witness senior advisor John Lloyd, Now what

0:02:34.760 --> 0:02:38.639
<v Speaker 1>should have happened was that Facebook should have identified the

0:02:38.680 --> 0:02:43.920
<v Speaker 1>misinformation in the ads and then denied the submitted advertisement. Instead,

0:02:43.960 --> 0:02:47.440
<v Speaker 1>Global Witness received notification after notification that the fake ads

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 1>had passed Muster, which the group rightfully points out brings

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:57.280
<v Speaker 1>into question Facebook's entire content moderation strategy. Brazil's upcoming election

0:02:57.360 --> 0:02:59.960
<v Speaker 1>is likely to be a rough one, with current president

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:03.680
<v Speaker 1>Bolsonaro seeking out another term in office. He's also been

0:03:03.720 --> 0:03:08.079
<v Speaker 1>accused of spreading disinformation, including calling into question the validity

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 1>of results from certain voting machines. Global Witness points out

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:15.200
<v Speaker 1>that its experiment wasn't just an exercise to see if

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Facebook is living up to its promise. It's really a

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:23.600
<v Speaker 1>critical demonstration of Facebook's failure in a high stakes, real

0:03:23.800 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 1>world scenario, something that is actually playing out right now.

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:31.160
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, not a good look. Now, let's switch gears

0:03:31.200 --> 0:03:36.560
<v Speaker 1>for a little bit. So, misinformation and disinformation are clearly bad, right,

0:03:36.640 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 1>Misinformation you want to avoid, and disinformation that that says

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:46.480
<v Speaker 1>there's a motive behind it where you are specifically seeking

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to mislead people. So we should really seek to eliminate

0:03:51.040 --> 0:03:56.840
<v Speaker 1>misinformation and disinformation from platforms. However, we also have to

0:03:56.880 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 1>take into account who is making the claim that a

0:04:00.680 --> 0:04:05.360
<v Speaker 1>particular something is in fact misinformation in the first place.

0:04:06.200 --> 0:04:10.120
<v Speaker 1>That requires critical thinking and sometimes it gets really hard

0:04:10.160 --> 0:04:13.120
<v Speaker 1>to know what is true. Right, Like, if someone says

0:04:13.200 --> 0:04:18.000
<v Speaker 1>that's fake news, and they offer no evidence to show

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 1>that the claim is fake, and that the actual claim

0:04:21.320 --> 0:04:25.119
<v Speaker 1>has evidence to show that it's valid, then you can't

0:04:25.160 --> 0:04:27.920
<v Speaker 1>just say, oh, well, it's fake because this person said

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:30.040
<v Speaker 1>it was fake. Right. And I say all this because

0:04:30.040 --> 0:04:32.719
<v Speaker 1>our next story is about how the Hong Kong Police

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 1>Force has opened a public relations wing that has identified

0:04:36.680 --> 0:04:40.760
<v Speaker 1>the elimination of online quote unquote smearring of police work

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 1>as a high priority. Now, the police force is claiming

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:48.240
<v Speaker 1>that misinformation campaigns are portraying Hong Kong police in a

0:04:48.240 --> 0:04:51.280
<v Speaker 1>negative way and that that has led to the deterioration

0:04:51.360 --> 0:04:54.400
<v Speaker 1>of the relationship between the public and the police force,

0:04:54.760 --> 0:04:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Whereas some of the critics would say the police using

0:04:58.200 --> 0:05:03.720
<v Speaker 1>uh increased force against citizens is the deteriorating relationship that

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>we should be concerned about. So you could argue that

0:05:07.600 --> 0:05:10.520
<v Speaker 1>the Hong Kong Police Force is looking to censor voices

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 1>that criticize the police or bring attention to situations that

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:18.520
<v Speaker 1>at least seemed to indicate an abuse of power. In

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:20.560
<v Speaker 1>other words, you could argue the police are using the

0:05:20.680 --> 0:05:25.040
<v Speaker 1>label of misinformation to silence activists and critics in an

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 1>effort to control the narrative. So dealing with misinformation is

0:05:29.600 --> 0:05:32.680
<v Speaker 1>a tricky thing. I don't mean to suggest that it's

0:05:32.720 --> 0:05:35.560
<v Speaker 1>super easy. You always have to examine the validity of

0:05:35.600 --> 0:05:39.680
<v Speaker 1>the claim that something is misinformation to start with. Now,

0:05:39.720 --> 0:05:42.240
<v Speaker 1>in the case of Global Witness, that was obvious, right

0:05:42.279 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 1>because the group outright inserted falsehoods into political ads. There's

0:05:47.040 --> 0:05:50.200
<v Speaker 1>no denying that they were testing it and saw that

0:05:50.279 --> 0:05:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Facebook failed. But in the case of Hong Kong, it

0:05:54.279 --> 0:05:57.080
<v Speaker 1>looks like it's more of an authoritarian move in order

0:05:57.120 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 1>to try and limit dissent. So again, while we should

0:06:02.839 --> 0:06:07.719
<v Speaker 1>be aiming to eliminate misinformation, we always have to be

0:06:08.440 --> 0:06:12.800
<v Speaker 1>cognizant of where the claims of misinformation were coming from

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:15.920
<v Speaker 1>and to weigh them carefully to make sure that this

0:06:16.080 --> 0:06:21.560
<v Speaker 1>isn't just an attempt to silence a critic. According to Bloomberg,

0:06:21.600 --> 0:06:25.320
<v Speaker 1>Apple is looking to insert more ads into the iPhone experience,

0:06:25.640 --> 0:06:29.360
<v Speaker 1>namely within certain first party Apple apps, uh the big

0:06:29.360 --> 0:06:33.400
<v Speaker 1>one being Apple Maps. Now, you might also encounter ads

0:06:33.440 --> 0:06:37.159
<v Speaker 1>within Apple's podcast app, And if that's the case, then

0:06:37.480 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>that means you're going to hear and see ads that

0:06:39.800 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 1>are not just inside a podcast, but also on the

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>podcasting platform itself. That's interesting because the podcast business is

0:06:46.960 --> 0:06:49.880
<v Speaker 1>largely dependent upon ads. I don't know if you've noticed,

0:06:49.920 --> 0:06:53.080
<v Speaker 1>but we've had a couple in our show. Well, Apple

0:06:53.080 --> 0:06:55.839
<v Speaker 1>doesn't get revenue from the ads that are in our show.

0:06:56.520 --> 0:07:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Apple is a way for people to access podcasts. But

0:07:00.360 --> 0:07:03.440
<v Speaker 1>unless the show was actually coming from Apple, then Apple

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:07.240
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really like revenue from the podcasts that are running.

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:10.720
<v Speaker 1>You know that it allows people to access, So putting

0:07:10.800 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 1>ads into the podcast app itself is a way for

0:07:15.000 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Apple to monetize the podcasting phenomenon. Also, a CNBC article

0:07:20.320 --> 0:07:23.240
<v Speaker 1>points out that Apple now has a huge advantage over

0:07:23.360 --> 0:07:27.000
<v Speaker 1>third party apps on iOS. So you might remember that

0:07:27.040 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 1>Apple introduced the app Tracking Transparency feature last year. This

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:33.760
<v Speaker 1>was a little notification that would pop up and let

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:36.400
<v Speaker 1>users decide whether or not they wanted to opt in

0:07:36.560 --> 0:07:40.440
<v Speaker 1>too targeted tracking from apps. That's the source of stuff

0:07:40.440 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 1>that lets companies like Meta capitalize on user activity. Now,

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:47.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of folks opted out when they got that choice.

0:07:47.120 --> 0:07:49.840
<v Speaker 1>They chose not to have their data shared with these

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:52.840
<v Speaker 1>third parties, and that's one of the major hits to

0:07:53.000 --> 0:07:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Meta's revenue In the recent past. In fact, the loss

0:07:56.360 --> 0:08:00.360
<v Speaker 1>of that customer data was a huge blow to Meta

0:08:00.560 --> 0:08:04.520
<v Speaker 1>because Meta was heavily dependent upon using that data in

0:08:04.640 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 1>order to market targeted ads and really make the most

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 1>out of its platforms. But without that piece, without your information,

0:08:13.320 --> 0:08:16.840
<v Speaker 1>then a lot of the value of that service is gone.

0:08:17.360 --> 0:08:20.920
<v Speaker 1>They can't target with such precision. Thus they can't demand

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the same sort of prices from advertisers that they had

0:08:24.160 --> 0:08:26.720
<v Speaker 1>in the past, and the whole thing starts to kind

0:08:26.720 --> 0:08:31.400
<v Speaker 1>of fall apart. Now, Apple still has all that information, right,

0:08:31.520 --> 0:08:34.360
<v Speaker 1>like they've collected that info. It's not, it's just that

0:08:34.360 --> 0:08:38.720
<v Speaker 1>they're not sharing it with third parties. So you could

0:08:38.760 --> 0:08:41.680
<v Speaker 1>imagine a future in which Apple builds out its own

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:45.439
<v Speaker 1>advertising business, for example, and leverages the data that other

0:08:45.520 --> 0:08:49.400
<v Speaker 1>parties aren't allowed to access, at least not without users

0:08:49.400 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 1>opting into the experience, right, And that's all speculation on

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:55.360
<v Speaker 1>my part, of course, It doesn't mean that that's what

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Apple is going to do. If Apple does design an

0:08:58.640 --> 0:09:02.200
<v Speaker 1>advertising business, it doesn't mean that Apple is going to

0:09:02.600 --> 0:09:06.599
<v Speaker 1>rely on that information without giving users the same opportunity

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:09.600
<v Speaker 1>to opt out with Apple that they had with other apps.

0:09:10.200 --> 0:09:12.400
<v Speaker 1>None of that is is known. One way or the other.

0:09:13.040 --> 0:09:17.839
<v Speaker 1>But if it did happen, it wouldn't surprise me, although

0:09:17.840 --> 0:09:21.400
<v Speaker 1>it would bring more anti competitive scrutiny onto Apple, which

0:09:21.480 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the company is already dealing with across the world in

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:29.640
<v Speaker 1>various UH venues. So we'll have to see if that,

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 1>in fact is where we're headed. Bloomberg also reports that

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 1>Apple has once again set a deadline for corporate employees

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:39.800
<v Speaker 1>to spend at least three days of the work week

0:09:39.840 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 1>in the office. Reportedly, employees are expected to come in

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:46.600
<v Speaker 1>on Tuesdays and Thursdays, plus another day that was set

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 1>by their team leaders. So that new deadline, at least

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 1>according to one reporter, is September five. As far as

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:58.160
<v Speaker 1>I know, Apple has not confirmed that or officially announced that,

0:09:58.679 --> 0:10:01.560
<v Speaker 1>but that's what a reporter's says. Is the plan that

0:10:01.600 --> 0:10:05.240
<v Speaker 1>by September five, all Apple corporate employees will be expected

0:10:05.240 --> 0:10:07.000
<v Speaker 1>to come into the office at least three days a

0:10:07.040 --> 0:10:10.720
<v Speaker 1>week now. Apple has moved this goal post multiple times

0:10:10.800 --> 0:10:14.960
<v Speaker 1>during the pandemic due to lots of reasons, mostly spikes

0:10:15.000 --> 0:10:18.000
<v Speaker 1>in COVID transmission rates, and there have been more than

0:10:18.040 --> 0:10:21.720
<v Speaker 1>a few reports of Apple corporate employees protesting this move.

0:10:21.760 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 1>In fact, the former head of Apple's machine learning department,

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Ian Goodfellow left Apple reportedly because of this mandate that

0:10:30.040 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>employees would have to return to the office. Of course,

0:10:33.360 --> 0:10:35.559
<v Speaker 1>we're also in a time where a lot of companies

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:39.360
<v Speaker 1>are looking to downsize, so you could argue that Apple's

0:10:39.360 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 1>continued insistence that employees returned to h Q might be

0:10:43.880 --> 0:10:47.160
<v Speaker 1>a way to kind of put the squeeze on Apple

0:10:47.200 --> 0:10:50.600
<v Speaker 1>employees and maybe shake out a few folks and slim

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:55.280
<v Speaker 1>down without actually having to hold layoffs. Of course, that's

0:10:55.320 --> 0:10:59.280
<v Speaker 1>just a possibility. I'm not saying that Apple is doing that.

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying that their companies are doing that. I just

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:06.440
<v Speaker 1>don't know if Apple is um and maybe the reason

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:08.480
<v Speaker 1>for it has nothing to do with that. Maybe there

0:11:08.679 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 1>is no desire to convince Apple employees, or at least

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:17.520
<v Speaker 1>some of them, to maybe leave the company. Maybe a

0:11:17.559 --> 0:11:20.800
<v Speaker 1>big part of it is that, I don't know, Apple

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>spent billions of dollars to build out this campus and

0:11:24.920 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 1>barely got any use out of it before the pandemic hit,

0:11:28.120 --> 0:11:30.840
<v Speaker 1>and by gum, Tim Cook once those folks in that

0:11:30.960 --> 0:11:34.440
<v Speaker 1>expensive building, I'm sure the truth of the matter is

0:11:34.760 --> 0:11:38.640
<v Speaker 1>far more subtle, far more nuanced and complicated, But It

0:11:38.720 --> 0:11:41.480
<v Speaker 1>sure is fun to kind of boil these things down

0:11:41.520 --> 0:11:45.319
<v Speaker 1>to an absurd level. Al Right, Well, that's enough absurdity

0:11:45.360 --> 0:11:47.560
<v Speaker 1>for now, let's take a quick break. When we come back,

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:58.559
<v Speaker 1>we'll have some more news. Before the break, I was

0:11:58.600 --> 0:12:02.200
<v Speaker 1>talking about Apple asking or telling employees that they need

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:04.600
<v Speaker 1>to come back to the office. Let's talk about what's

0:12:04.640 --> 0:12:06.920
<v Speaker 1>going on over at A T and T. There's a

0:12:06.960 --> 0:12:10.560
<v Speaker 1>similar battle brewing between employees and management now. Some of

0:12:10.600 --> 0:12:13.319
<v Speaker 1>A T and T s employees have representation with the

0:12:13.360 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Communications Workers of America UH and the cw A has

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:21.680
<v Speaker 1>negotiated an extension for work from home operations until the

0:12:21.800 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 1>end of March two thousand twenty three. However, some A

0:12:26.240 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 1>T and T employees are saying that there are already

0:12:29.040 --> 0:12:32.200
<v Speaker 1>groups within the company that management has forced to come

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:35.960
<v Speaker 1>back to the office now, so they're saying it just

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:38.640
<v Speaker 1>it depends upon which department you work in and what

0:12:38.720 --> 0:12:41.720
<v Speaker 1>team you work for. Now, this has become an issue

0:12:41.720 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 1>for employee morale because those who have been forced to

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:47.920
<v Speaker 1>go back into the office are kind of envying the

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:50.560
<v Speaker 1>departments that continue to work from home. A lot of

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:53.120
<v Speaker 1>folks have said that working from home had no negative

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:58.200
<v Speaker 1>impact on productivity, or performance, so there was no downside

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 1>to the company for them work from home, and that moreover,

0:13:01.640 --> 0:13:04.640
<v Speaker 1>workers were saving money on stuff like transportation and other

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:07.440
<v Speaker 1>expenses that led to a boost in quality of life

0:13:07.440 --> 0:13:11.240
<v Speaker 1>for the workers. So the narrative that we're seeing develop

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:16.840
<v Speaker 1>across the entire industry is that workers feel the real

0:13:16.960 --> 0:13:21.439
<v Speaker 1>reason employers want them in the office isn't so much

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:24.360
<v Speaker 1>about contributing to the bottom line. It's not so much

0:13:24.400 --> 0:13:29.560
<v Speaker 1>about performance and productivity and creativity and collaboration. It's more

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:32.880
<v Speaker 1>about surveillance and control. If the employees are not in

0:13:32.920 --> 0:13:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the office, they can't be watched and they can't be controlled.

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 1>And whether that's a realistic narrative or not, I don't know.

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I'm certain that most bosses aren't thinking of it in

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:47.880
<v Speaker 1>those terms, but I know that that's a narrative that

0:13:48.040 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 1>is growing in in uh in size across the industry. Right.

0:13:53.240 --> 0:13:57.239
<v Speaker 1>You're seeing more and more people essentially boiled down the

0:13:57.240 --> 0:14:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the matter into those kind of terms. It's oh, I

0:14:00.320 --> 0:14:03.560
<v Speaker 1>know that any company out there there really wants to

0:14:03.600 --> 0:14:07.320
<v Speaker 1>bring its employees back into offices needs to be able

0:14:07.360 --> 0:14:10.440
<v Speaker 1>to address that concern in a satisfying way, or then

0:14:10.520 --> 0:14:13.040
<v Speaker 1>that narrative will continue to grow there as well. If

0:14:13.400 --> 0:14:16.040
<v Speaker 1>your employees are convinced that the only reason they're being

0:14:16.080 --> 0:14:19.480
<v Speaker 1>brought back into the office is so that the boss

0:14:19.560 --> 0:14:23.280
<v Speaker 1>can keep an eye on them and that's it, then

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:27.640
<v Speaker 1>that's not a good narrative, right that that's that's going

0:14:27.680 --> 0:14:30.440
<v Speaker 1>to paint the company as a bad place to work.

0:14:31.160 --> 0:14:34.840
<v Speaker 1>That it's unreasonable. So again, I don't think that that's

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:38.800
<v Speaker 1>necessarily where most companies are. I can't imagine most bosses

0:14:38.840 --> 0:14:42.640
<v Speaker 1>actually thinking in that that way, but they need to

0:14:42.640 --> 0:14:45.240
<v Speaker 1>get ahead of it if they want people to come

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:48.920
<v Speaker 1>back into the office and not have it be a

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:53.400
<v Speaker 1>catastrophic effect on the morale of the employees. Signal, the

0:14:53.480 --> 0:14:57.880
<v Speaker 1>encrypted messaging service, reported that a fishing attack on Twilo

0:14:58.040 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 1>Incorporated could mean the up to one thousand, nine hundred

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:05.400
<v Speaker 1>Signal users had their phone numbers revealed to the attackers.

0:15:05.440 --> 0:15:10.320
<v Speaker 1>So here's the breakdown. Twilo is a verification services provider

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 1>and Signal uses Twilo's verification services, so Signal was not compromised.

0:15:17.680 --> 0:15:22.640
<v Speaker 1>The hackers did not target and and compromise Signal. Instead,

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:26.920
<v Speaker 1>they compromised a company that Signal partners with for the

0:15:27.040 --> 0:15:30.479
<v Speaker 1>verification services. So the good news is that the attackers

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:33.120
<v Speaker 1>seem to only have been able to get the phone numbers,

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 1>not even like the names of the people that the

0:15:35.680 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 1>phone numbers correspond to, just the numbers that represent devices

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:42.520
<v Speaker 1>that have signal installed on them, and it's just nine

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 1>of them. That really limits what the attackers can do

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:50.240
<v Speaker 1>with that information. They could conceivably attempt to reregister a

0:15:50.280 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 1>device's number, but that's about it. They didn't have access

0:15:53.800 --> 0:15:58.120
<v Speaker 1>to message history or profile information or anything like that,

0:15:58.280 --> 0:16:00.960
<v Speaker 1>so it could have been much worse. But it does

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:04.400
<v Speaker 1>bring into focus the interconnected nature of tech companies and

0:16:04.440 --> 0:16:07.600
<v Speaker 1>how challenging it is to create a secure process because

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:11.800
<v Speaker 1>if you're relying on another party to provide services that

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:16.480
<v Speaker 1>make your company, you know, services possible, you might not

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:21.080
<v Speaker 1>have total control over your own security procedures because some

0:16:21.160 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 1>of them are dependent upon another company entirely. So yeah,

0:16:26.200 --> 0:16:30.720
<v Speaker 1>it's complicated. Not long ago, a security researcher named Lenart

0:16:30.720 --> 0:16:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Wilder's and my apologies for butchering the name, revealed that

0:16:34.240 --> 0:16:36.320
<v Speaker 1>he was able to use a homemade device to hack

0:16:36.440 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 1>into Starlink, the satellite internet service provider arm of SpaceX now.

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:46.040
<v Speaker 1>Starlink has since congratulated him on his find as it

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, it uncovered a vulnerability that the company needed

0:16:49.080 --> 0:16:52.480
<v Speaker 1>to address. And you know he wasn't being a malicious hacker.

0:16:52.560 --> 0:16:55.880
<v Speaker 1>He was testing the security of starlinks technology and found

0:16:55.920 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 1>a an inroad. And the way I think about this

0:16:58.480 --> 0:17:01.600
<v Speaker 1>is that if researchers did do this and didn't reveal

0:17:01.640 --> 0:17:04.880
<v Speaker 1>their findings, there would be a danger that these vulnerabilities

0:17:04.880 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 1>would go unpatched, and then someone eventually who has bad

0:17:08.520 --> 0:17:12.480
<v Speaker 1>intentions would discover those vulnerabilities and then do nasty evil

0:17:12.520 --> 0:17:16.000
<v Speaker 1>things with that information. To that end, starlinkin SpaceX have

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:20.080
<v Speaker 1>announced a bug bounty program inviting security researchers to poke

0:17:20.160 --> 0:17:23.159
<v Speaker 1>and prod and look for vulnerabilities, and if they discover

0:17:23.200 --> 0:17:26.639
<v Speaker 1>and report one, they get rewarded up to twenty five

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:29.920
<v Speaker 1>thousand bucks, depending upon the nature of the vulnerability, which

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:32.280
<v Speaker 1>is a responsible way to try and keep systems safe,

0:17:32.320 --> 0:17:35.479
<v Speaker 1>because if you're not supporting some sort of bug bounty,

0:17:35.520 --> 0:17:38.760
<v Speaker 1>you're inviting hackers to make money from those same vulnerabilities

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 1>in more nefarious ways. And finally, this past weekend, as

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 1>I said, was def Con a hacking convention and a

0:17:45.040 --> 0:17:47.200
<v Speaker 1>place where you absolutely want to make sure you're only

0:17:47.240 --> 0:17:49.480
<v Speaker 1>carrying a burner phone that has none of your personal

0:17:49.480 --> 0:17:53.320
<v Speaker 1>information on it, and one of the hackers attending goes

0:17:53.400 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 1>by the handle sick codes, and among sick codes as

0:17:56.560 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 1>accomplishments is jail breaking. John dear farm equipment. Now, I've

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:04.200
<v Speaker 1>talked about this on past episodes, but John Deer installs

0:18:04.240 --> 0:18:08.119
<v Speaker 1>computers and software on its equipment like tractors that not

0:18:08.200 --> 0:18:11.720
<v Speaker 1>only provide extra functionality and features to the equipment, it

0:18:11.800 --> 0:18:15.560
<v Speaker 1>also really restricts how farmers can maintain and repair their stuff.

0:18:15.760 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 1>In fact, you could argue that really the main reason

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 1>for this technology is to create a closed off ecosystem

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 1>where the farmers have no option but to take their

0:18:24.119 --> 0:18:28.400
<v Speaker 1>equipment to authorize John Deer Associates to have their equipment

0:18:28.440 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>serviced and repaired. And that's why this company comes up

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:34.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot in conversations around the right to repair, which

0:18:34.840 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 1>has this radical notion that once you purchase something, you

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:39.800
<v Speaker 1>should be able to maintain it, repair it, and customize

0:18:39.800 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 1>it without limitations. Take it to whomever you want, not

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:46.359
<v Speaker 1>just an authorized dealer you know because you bought the

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:49.080
<v Speaker 1>ding dang darn thing. But companies like John Deer have

0:18:49.240 --> 0:18:53.680
<v Speaker 1>these systems in place to make that difficult or impossible. Well,

0:18:53.920 --> 0:18:58.480
<v Speaker 1>sick Codes had already demonstrated that he could compromise a

0:18:58.680 --> 0:19:01.880
<v Speaker 1>John Dear piece of equipment that he could hack and

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:06.399
<v Speaker 1>get control root control of the computer system underneath. But

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:10.680
<v Speaker 1>this year at dev Coon, he partnered with a Doom

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:15.720
<v Speaker 1>model named Skelegant or handle Skelegant, and she created a

0:19:15.800 --> 0:19:18.680
<v Speaker 1>version of Doom that you could play on a John

0:19:18.720 --> 0:19:24.000
<v Speaker 1>Dear tractor like it had you mowing down demons in

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:27.119
<v Speaker 1>a corn field. So great since the humor Skelegon, I

0:19:27.160 --> 0:19:31.560
<v Speaker 1>really dig that and just showed that, Yeah, ultimately, this

0:19:31.640 --> 0:19:34.080
<v Speaker 1>is just a computer system and all you have to

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:39.360
<v Speaker 1>do is get around the various gates that John Dear

0:19:39.440 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 1>has put up blocking you from having root access, which

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:47.199
<v Speaker 1>sick Codes has already demonstrated he can do interesting stuff.

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:50.800
<v Speaker 1>Well that's it for this episode of tech Stuff. I

0:19:50.840 --> 0:19:53.119
<v Speaker 1>hope you're having a great week and I'll talk to

0:19:53.119 --> 0:20:02.440
<v Speaker 1>you again really soon. Text Stuff is an I Heart

0:20:02.520 --> 0:20:06.280
<v Speaker 1>Radio production. For more podcasts from I Heart Radio, visit

0:20:06.320 --> 0:20:09.359
<v Speaker 1>the i Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever you

0:20:09.480 --> 0:20:10.800
<v Speaker 1>listen to your favorite shows.