WEBVTT - Ep 51 "Why do brains dream?"

0:00:04.760 --> 0:00:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Why do brains dream? And what's going on with the

0:00:09.039 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>bizarreness of dreams? Why doesn't your clock work in your dreams?

0:00:14.240 --> 0:00:16.080
<v Speaker 1>And even though you spend a lot of your day

0:00:16.160 --> 0:00:20.120
<v Speaker 1>working on cell phones and computers, why do those almost

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:23.799
<v Speaker 1>never make appearances in your dream content? There are so

0:00:23.880 --> 0:00:27.080
<v Speaker 1>many cool questions that we're going to address today. Is

0:00:27.200 --> 0:00:31.320
<v Speaker 1>dream content the same across cultures and across time? Are

0:00:31.440 --> 0:00:35.280
<v Speaker 1>dreams experienced in black and white or in color? Why

0:00:35.280 --> 0:00:38.640
<v Speaker 1>do I think about dreams as this strange love child

0:00:38.760 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 1>between brain plasticity and the rotation of the planet. What

0:00:43.440 --> 0:00:47.559
<v Speaker 1>is the relationship between schizophrenia and dreaming? And in the

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:50.800
<v Speaker 1>future will we be able to read out the content

0:00:51.200 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>of somebody's dream? Welcome to Inner Cosmos with me David Eagleman.

0:00:58.600 --> 0:01:01.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm a neuroscientist and author at Stanford and in these

0:01:02.000 --> 0:01:05.920
<v Speaker 1>episodes we sail deeply into our three pound universe to

0:01:06.000 --> 0:01:09.640
<v Speaker 1>understand why and how our lives look the way they

0:01:09.720 --> 0:01:19.320
<v Speaker 1>do and how we experience our life includes our nocturnal life.

0:01:19.400 --> 0:01:23.520
<v Speaker 1>We spend a third of our lives with our eyes closed,

0:01:24.000 --> 0:01:28.520
<v Speaker 1>lying still and horizontal, like a meat robot that's been

0:01:28.640 --> 0:01:33.080
<v Speaker 1>switched off. But why in the last episode, we talked

0:01:33.120 --> 0:01:36.960
<v Speaker 1>all about sleep, why brains do that, and why all

0:01:37.000 --> 0:01:40.080
<v Speaker 1>animals do that, and what is happening in the brain

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 1>during sleep. Today we're going to zoom in on one

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:48.360
<v Speaker 1>of my favorite subjects, a very strange thing the brain does,

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:52.560
<v Speaker 1>which we call dreaming. We spend a fraction of our

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 1>sleep time locked in a different reality, swimming around in

0:01:57.480 --> 0:02:01.400
<v Speaker 1>plots which aren't real, and they're often not even realistic,

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:07.680
<v Speaker 1>but which nonetheless convince us entirely. And today we're going

0:02:07.760 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>to see what that's all about. Humans have been writing

0:02:11.440 --> 0:02:14.919
<v Speaker 1>about dreams and pondering about them for a long time,

0:02:15.080 --> 0:02:17.680
<v Speaker 1>and essentially we have evidence of this from the beginning

0:02:17.720 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 1>of writing. We see detailed dream reports from ancient Egyptians

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:27.280
<v Speaker 1>and Romans and Chinese. The Bible is full of dreams.

0:02:27.360 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 1>Every culture in the world has been fascinated by these

0:02:31.080 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 1>strange nocturnal journeys that we go on. And as we'll

0:02:34.360 --> 0:02:38.960
<v Speaker 1>see shortly, there's an interesting surprise, which is that dream content,

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 1>in other words, the kind of things that people dream about,

0:02:42.560 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 1>is essentially the same across cultures and across time, and

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:50.480
<v Speaker 1>that serves as a clue that will allow us to

0:02:50.680 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>unlock some mysteries about what otherwise feels like a deeply

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:59.560
<v Speaker 1>mysterious experience that we enjoy or suffer every night of

0:02:59.600 --> 0:03:03.320
<v Speaker 1>our life lives. So strap in for an episode full

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:06.760
<v Speaker 1>of surprises. So let's start with a poem that Lord

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Byron wrote in eighteen sixteen called The Dream. He wrote,

0:03:11.520 --> 0:03:15.840
<v Speaker 1>sleep hath its own world and a wide realm of

0:03:16.040 --> 0:03:22.240
<v Speaker 1>wild reality. And dreams, in their development have breath and tears,

0:03:22.320 --> 0:03:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and tortures and the touch of joy. They leave a

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:31.640
<v Speaker 1>weight upon our waking thoughts. So dreams are indeed a

0:03:32.200 --> 0:03:35.800
<v Speaker 1>wild reality. The thing we all find so amazing about

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 1>dreaming is its bizarreness. You're seeing new things, you hold

0:03:41.080 --> 0:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>strange beliefs, and you fall for it all hook line

0:03:45.120 --> 0:03:48.680
<v Speaker 1>and sinker. Whatever your brain serves up to you, you

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>believe it entirely. So we'll talk about all this, But

0:03:52.120 --> 0:03:56.240
<v Speaker 1>let's first zoom in on what's happening inside the brain.

0:03:56.960 --> 0:04:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Dreaming occurs during rapid eye moos movement or rem sleep,

0:04:03.120 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 1>where your eyes are darting back and forth. There's nothing

0:04:05.800 --> 0:04:08.200
<v Speaker 1>coming in the eyes, of course, they're shut, so all

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>the activity is internally generated. For good housekeeping, all just

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:17.680
<v Speaker 1>note that rem sleep isn't necessarily equivalent to dream sleep,

0:04:17.880 --> 0:04:21.040
<v Speaker 1>but that's when most dreaming occurs. Now, how do we

0:04:21.120 --> 0:04:24.480
<v Speaker 1>know that, Well, it's because if you wait until someone

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:27.480
<v Speaker 1>enters rems sleep, their eyes are going back and forth,

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:29.920
<v Speaker 1>and then you shake them awake and you say, hey,

0:04:30.400 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 1>what were you just experiencing? They'll tell you WHOA, I

0:04:35.040 --> 0:04:38.440
<v Speaker 1>was just panicking because I was at work but realized

0:04:38.480 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>I had forgotten to put on pants, and I was

0:04:40.600 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 1>hiding behind the plant pots and figuring out how to

0:04:44.000 --> 0:04:47.280
<v Speaker 1>escape before the meeting started. But if you wake them

0:04:47.360 --> 0:04:50.479
<v Speaker 1>up during the rest of the ninety minute sleep cycle,

0:04:50.920 --> 0:04:53.640
<v Speaker 1>during the stages that we call slow wave sleep, and

0:04:53.680 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 1>you say, hey, what were you just experiencing, they'll generally

0:04:57.279 --> 0:05:02.120
<v Speaker 1>say nothing, I wasn't there. Now, for completeness, I'll mention

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 1>that sometimes people report some form of mental activity during

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:10.880
<v Speaker 1>slow wave sleep, but when they do, this is usually

0:05:10.920 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 1>just a thought or making a plan. But it lacks

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:21.520
<v Speaker 1>the visual vividness and the hallucinatory components of typical dreams.

0:05:21.760 --> 0:05:25.440
<v Speaker 1>So dreaming of the sort we're interested in today happens

0:05:25.520 --> 0:05:32.280
<v Speaker 1>during rem sleep. Now, although dreams seem so untethered and ethereal,

0:05:32.760 --> 0:05:36.520
<v Speaker 1>there are specific things happening under the hood. Dreaming depends

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:40.920
<v Speaker 1>on the normal functioning of a particular network of brain areas.

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>This is primarily in the limbic and paralymbic and association areas.

0:05:45.560 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Now we know that from brain imaging, but also because

0:05:48.320 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 1>damage in this network can produce temporary or permanent dream

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:59.440
<v Speaker 1>loss or impairment like loss of visual dream imagery. Now,

0:05:59.480 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 1>not all of those areas might sound familiar to you,

0:06:01.920 --> 0:06:04.960
<v Speaker 1>but you've probably heard of the limbic system, which sits

0:06:04.960 --> 0:06:08.880
<v Speaker 1>at the heart of your emotions. So presumably this is

0:06:08.920 --> 0:06:13.880
<v Speaker 1>why dreams are so overloaded with high emotion. And I

0:06:13.920 --> 0:06:16.960
<v Speaker 1>also want to mention a brain era that is suppressed

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:20.560
<v Speaker 1>during rem sleep, and that is the hippocampus. This is

0:06:20.560 --> 0:06:24.440
<v Speaker 1>an area that's required to convert short term memory into

0:06:24.480 --> 0:06:27.080
<v Speaker 1>long term memory. And this is why when you wake

0:06:27.160 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 1>up from a dream, you can remember it so clearly,

0:06:31.279 --> 0:06:35.279
<v Speaker 1>but after about fifteen minutes it just slips away from you.

0:06:35.279 --> 0:06:38.560
<v Speaker 1>You just can't hold on to what happened. This is

0:06:38.560 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 1>because you have the short term memory just fine, but

0:06:42.560 --> 0:06:45.880
<v Speaker 1>you're not converting it into long term memory, and so

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 1>it simply fades before your eyes. And by the way,

0:06:50.040 --> 0:06:53.000
<v Speaker 1>I think this experience that we have every morning can

0:06:53.440 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>enhance our empathy about what it would be like to

0:06:56.560 --> 0:07:00.480
<v Speaker 1>have something like Alzheimer's disease, because a person with Allsheimers

0:07:00.880 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 1>says on the phone, Okay, I'll be right down there

0:07:03.360 --> 0:07:05.800
<v Speaker 1>in a moment, and they hang up, and then the

0:07:05.880 --> 0:07:09.600
<v Speaker 1>memory of that just slips away. So even though you

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>might tell a relative with Alzheimer's, come on, just try

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:16.840
<v Speaker 1>harder to remember. Just think about somebody telling that to

0:07:16.880 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 1>you about your dreams in the morning. So back to

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:23.560
<v Speaker 1>the Byron poem, the line that I thought was interesting

0:07:23.760 --> 0:07:28.600
<v Speaker 1>was they leave a weight upon our waking thoughts because

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:32.040
<v Speaker 1>they don't directly interact with our waking thoughts, but instead

0:07:32.080 --> 0:07:36.040
<v Speaker 1>they can just put a spin on our mood, even

0:07:36.080 --> 0:07:39.840
<v Speaker 1>if we don't remember why. Okay, so what do we

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 1>see in the brain when dreaming begins, Well, just before

0:07:44.240 --> 0:07:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the onset of your eyes darting back and forth, you

0:07:48.080 --> 0:07:51.440
<v Speaker 1>have a group of neurons in the brain stem, specifically

0:07:51.480 --> 0:07:54.600
<v Speaker 1>in an area called the ponds, and these crank up,

0:07:54.920 --> 0:07:58.920
<v Speaker 1>and these trigger several consequences. The first is that your

0:07:59.160 --> 0:08:04.320
<v Speaker 1>major muscle groups get paralyzed. This is called atonia. So

0:08:04.560 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 1>you've got this elaborate neural circuitry that keeps the body

0:08:08.640 --> 0:08:13.040
<v Speaker 1>paralyzed during dreaming. And by the way, the very elaborateness

0:08:13.080 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>of this circuitry emphasizes the biological importance of dream sleep.

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>You don't get this kind of complexity by accident. Presumably,

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:27.280
<v Speaker 1>dreaming would be unlikely to evolve and remain without an

0:08:27.320 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 1>important function behind it. So why do we get this

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:34.640
<v Speaker 1>paralysis of the muscles. It allows the possibility for the

0:08:34.640 --> 0:08:40.080
<v Speaker 1>brain to experience things and simulate reality without actually moving

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:43.560
<v Speaker 1>the body. The second consequence of these neurons in the

0:08:43.600 --> 0:08:47.040
<v Speaker 1>ponds is that they trigger these waves of activity known

0:08:47.040 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 1>as PGO waves, and these are key to the experience

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:56.360
<v Speaker 1>of dreaming. These PGO waves travel to a tiny area

0:08:56.480 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 1>called the geniculate nucleus and from there these waves of

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:03.440
<v Speaker 1>activity slam into the occipital cortex at the back of

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:07.640
<v Speaker 1>your head. In other words, they drive activity into the

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:11.280
<v Speaker 1>visual system. So that's why these are called PGO waves.

0:09:11.320 --> 0:09:14.520
<v Speaker 1>Because they start in the ponds, p move to the

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:18.679
<v Speaker 1>geniculate g and go to the occipital cortex. Oh pgoh

0:09:18.960 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 1>I mention all this detail. Because PGO waves are the

0:09:22.440 --> 0:09:28.200
<v Speaker 1>neural correlate of dreaming, the visual areas become alive with

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 1>activity allowing us to see our dreams. You blast activity

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 1>into the visual cortex and you enjoy visual experience even

0:09:37.840 --> 0:09:42.560
<v Speaker 1>though your eyes are closed. Now, interestingly, when you measure

0:09:42.640 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 1>electrical activity across the brain with EEG, when you do

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:50.040
<v Speaker 1>this during rem sleep, it looks really similar to that

0:09:50.160 --> 0:09:54.960
<v Speaker 1>during the waking state. You see similar patterns in both states,

0:09:55.240 --> 0:09:58.679
<v Speaker 1>for example, lots of gamma wave frequency, which is generally

0:09:58.720 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 1>thought to reflect something about cognitive processing, with the exception

0:10:03.640 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 1>of the paralyzed muscles and the lack of external visual

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 1>input because your eyes are closed, the states of rem

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:15.120
<v Speaker 1>sleep and of wakefulness they kind of resemble one another.

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 1>And this is what we might expect from a state

0:10:17.679 --> 0:10:23.960
<v Speaker 1>of consciousness that's altered. But it's some sort of consciousness nonetheless. Okay,

0:10:24.080 --> 0:10:27.160
<v Speaker 1>so that's what's happening in the brain when we dream.

0:10:27.320 --> 0:10:31.199
<v Speaker 1>But why do we dream? Well, there are various hypotheses

0:10:31.240 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 1>about this, and I mentioned one last week, which is

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:38.480
<v Speaker 1>that maybe dreams allow us to simulate rare situations. In

0:10:38.520 --> 0:10:44.760
<v Speaker 1>other words, these nocturnal neural simulations might allow us and

0:10:44.800 --> 0:10:49.240
<v Speaker 1>all animals to test out activities without the danger and

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:51.440
<v Speaker 1>risk of doing so in the real world. So you

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:56.240
<v Speaker 1>can practice through different scenarios with your muscles all shut down.

0:10:56.800 --> 0:11:00.920
<v Speaker 1>So people who advocate this theory suggest that the periodic

0:11:01.120 --> 0:11:05.080
<v Speaker 1>stimulation of the cortex in this semi random and non

0:11:05.120 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 1>specific manner this can maintain circuits that are really important

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:13.480
<v Speaker 1>for survival, but they rarely get activated because you don't

0:11:13.520 --> 0:11:16.920
<v Speaker 1>run into emergencies that often. So the idea is that

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 1>you're just sending in random activity, keeping the engine oiled

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:24.640
<v Speaker 1>in case you need one of these programs sometime, and

0:11:24.760 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 1>some researchers suggest that it's even more specific than that.

0:11:27.920 --> 0:11:32.679
<v Speaker 1>A version of this framework called threat simulation theory, suggests

0:11:32.720 --> 0:11:36.840
<v Speaker 1>that dreams exist to simulate threatening events and to rehearse

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 1>what to do in the face of threat, and that

0:11:39.800 --> 0:11:42.880
<v Speaker 1>seems on its surface at least consistent with the high

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 1>prevalence of violence and aggression in dreams. But I want

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:51.080
<v Speaker 1>to note that there's no data that directly supports this idea,

0:11:51.160 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 1>and I mentioned last week that this theory suggests that

0:11:55.520 --> 0:11:59.200
<v Speaker 1>people exposed to more survival threats in waking life might

0:11:59.280 --> 0:12:02.800
<v Speaker 1>have a more common experience of threat dreams at night,

0:12:03.160 --> 0:12:06.600
<v Speaker 1>but the data do not support that. Also, the threat

0:12:06.640 --> 0:12:10.240
<v Speaker 1>perception theory doesn't explain the fact that most dreams are

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 1>totally meaningless and bizarre instead of involving any meaningful threat

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:18.160
<v Speaker 1>perception or threat avoidance. So back to the question of

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:21.640
<v Speaker 1>why we dream. A few years ago, my colleague Don

0:12:21.720 --> 0:12:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Vaughan and I proposed a new theory which is the

0:12:25.240 --> 0:12:30.200
<v Speaker 1>only one that makes quantitative predictions across species. And if

0:12:30.240 --> 0:12:33.440
<v Speaker 1>you heard episode eleven you may remember about this. That

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>theory has to do with brain plasticity. And here's the idea.

0:12:37.160 --> 0:12:40.320
<v Speaker 1>In a nutshell, we know that if a person goes blind,

0:12:40.960 --> 0:12:44.959
<v Speaker 1>other senses start to take over what was the visual cortex.

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:47.840
<v Speaker 1>In other words, the territory of the visual system is

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 1>not fixed permanently, but instead the wiring of the brain

0:12:51.840 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 1>is quite fluid, and there's a takeover that happens. Okay, now,

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:58.160
<v Speaker 1>it turns out that if you take a normally cited

0:12:58.200 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 1>person and you blindfold, you can start seeing the beginnings

0:13:03.240 --> 0:13:07.880
<v Speaker 1>of this takeover in neuroimaging starting in about one hour.

0:13:08.400 --> 0:13:12.120
<v Speaker 1>And that really surprised us because of how fast the

0:13:12.160 --> 0:13:16.240
<v Speaker 1>takeover starts to happen. So what does this rapidity of

0:13:16.360 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 1>the takeover of the cortex have to do with dreaming?

0:13:20.080 --> 0:13:23.439
<v Speaker 1>While in the incessant competition for territory in the brain,

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:27.720
<v Speaker 1>the visual system has a special challenge because of the

0:13:27.760 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 1>planet's rotation, we experience darkness for about twelve out of

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:36.040
<v Speaker 1>every twenty four hours. And obviously I'm talking about our

0:13:36.120 --> 0:13:42.280
<v Speaker 1>evolutionary history, not the recently electrically blessed times. In other words,

0:13:42.360 --> 0:13:47.200
<v Speaker 1>our ancestors all spent their lives as inadvertent participants in

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:51.040
<v Speaker 1>a blindfold experiment every single night. So how did their

0:13:51.160 --> 0:13:55.679
<v Speaker 1>visual cortex defend its territory when you've got no data

0:13:55.720 --> 0:13:59.080
<v Speaker 1>coming in through the eyes. So our proposal is that

0:13:59.160 --> 0:14:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the visual corret tex preserves its territory by finding a

0:14:03.160 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 1>way to remain active at night. And we call this

0:14:05.720 --> 0:14:11.240
<v Speaker 1>the defensive activation theory. And the purpose of dreaming here

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:15.560
<v Speaker 1>is to keep cells in the visual cortex active, and

0:14:15.600 --> 0:14:19.120
<v Speaker 1>that's how it resists conquest by the territories of the

0:14:19.480 --> 0:14:22.960
<v Speaker 1>other senses. Vision is the only one of the senses

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:27.000
<v Speaker 1>that's disadvantaged by darkness. You can still touch and smell,

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 1>and taste and hear in the dark, and so it's

0:14:29.240 --> 0:14:33.960
<v Speaker 1>the only sense that needs internally generated activity to maintain

0:14:34.160 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 1>its borders during the long night. So, as a result,

0:14:38.000 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 1>about every ninety minutes you get this internally generated activity

0:14:42.280 --> 0:14:47.320
<v Speaker 1>that blasts exclusively into the visual cortex, and so dreams

0:14:47.360 --> 0:14:52.720
<v Speaker 1>are experienced as primarily visual. So several predictions immediately fall

0:14:52.760 --> 0:14:58.240
<v Speaker 1>out of the defensive activation theory. First, because brain plasticity

0:14:58.280 --> 0:15:01.440
<v Speaker 1>diminishes with age, this would suggest that the amount of

0:15:01.480 --> 0:15:05.200
<v Speaker 1>time spent in REM sleep should also decrease as one

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:08.080
<v Speaker 1>moves through the lifespan, and that turns out to be

0:15:08.120 --> 0:15:12.840
<v Speaker 1>exactly what happens. REM sleep in humans accounts for half

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:16.480
<v Speaker 1>of an infant's sleep time, but as a person grows older,

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 1>the percentage of remsleep decreases steadily. In other words, diminishing

0:15:21.880 --> 0:15:26.360
<v Speaker 1>plasticity of the brain correlates with less REM sleep. But

0:15:26.400 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 1>more importantly, we made a more quantified prediction. We said, hey,

0:15:30.760 --> 0:15:34.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe the more flexible and animal's brain is the more

0:15:35.160 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 1>REM sleep it requires to defend its visual cortex. So

0:15:39.040 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Don and I studied the plasticity in twenty five species

0:15:43.080 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 1>of primates and we found that the species with more

0:15:46.480 --> 0:15:50.720
<v Speaker 1>plastic brains spend more time in REMS sleep every night.

0:15:51.000 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 1>So you'd think that these two measures REM sleep and

0:15:54.680 --> 0:15:58.200
<v Speaker 1>brain plasticity they would be totally unconnected, So it was

0:15:58.320 --> 0:16:02.080
<v Speaker 1>very surprising to find that they are tightly linked. So

0:16:02.280 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 1>dreaming defends the visual cortex. Now, the circuitry that underpins dreaming.

0:16:08.240 --> 0:16:12.240
<v Speaker 1>This is so ancient and deeply wired that even people

0:16:12.280 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 1>who are blind have it. But note that blind people

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:20.480
<v Speaker 1>don't have visual dreams. Instead, their nighttime hallucinations involve the

0:16:20.600 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 1>other senses, like feeling their way around an oddly arranged

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:30.440
<v Speaker 1>kitchen or hearing strangers speaking. Why because other sensory errors

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:35.080
<v Speaker 1>have annexed the underused visual cortex. So think about it

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:38.360
<v Speaker 1>this way. People who can see and those with visual impairments,

0:16:38.560 --> 0:16:42.600
<v Speaker 1>they both have activity shooting into their occipital lobe during dreaming,

0:16:42.960 --> 0:16:47.880
<v Speaker 1>but the senses processed by that territory are different. The

0:16:47.960 --> 0:16:52.720
<v Speaker 1>defensive activation theory also makes more general predictions. If dream

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 1>sleep is triggered by the absence of visual input during

0:16:56.000 --> 0:16:59.720
<v Speaker 1>the night, we might presume that a person deprived of

0:16:59.840 --> 0:17:05.359
<v Speaker 1>vision while awake could similarly experience dreamlike visual hallucinations. And

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:09.560
<v Speaker 1>that is exactly what happens when people have degenerating vision,

0:17:09.840 --> 0:17:12.919
<v Speaker 1>or they end up in solitary confinement or even just

0:17:12.960 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 1>in a dark float tank. Any situation in which vision

0:17:16.520 --> 0:17:22.000
<v Speaker 1>gets deprived, the brain starts fighting back and having hallucinations.

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:26.920
<v Speaker 1>So that's the idea. Dreams are a screensaver. The brain

0:17:26.960 --> 0:17:30.800
<v Speaker 1>puts activity into the visual cortex to prevent it from

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:34.720
<v Speaker 1>getting ruined during the night. Okay, so you might say, fine,

0:17:34.800 --> 0:17:39.399
<v Speaker 1>your hypothesis seems plausible, But why do dreams seem to

0:17:39.440 --> 0:17:43.560
<v Speaker 1>be stories? After all, we don't just see random snow

0:17:43.760 --> 0:17:47.600
<v Speaker 1>like on an old television. We experience stories, and in fact,

0:17:47.960 --> 0:17:52.240
<v Speaker 1>there are various stories of someone discovering something in dreams,

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 1>like Kurkule thinking of the structure of the Benzene ring

0:17:56.080 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 1>based on a dream he had of two snakes biting

0:17:59.000 --> 0:18:02.679
<v Speaker 1>each other's tails, or Paul McCartney dreaming the melody for

0:18:02.720 --> 0:18:07.240
<v Speaker 1>the song Yesterday. So what's up with dream content? The

0:18:07.359 --> 0:18:12.200
<v Speaker 1>key is that the brain is a storytelling machine. Your

0:18:12.240 --> 0:18:17.840
<v Speaker 1>brain is deeply carved with roadways that represent your experience

0:18:17.880 --> 0:18:20.120
<v Speaker 1>in the world, and these are stored in what are

0:18:20.119 --> 0:18:24.520
<v Speaker 1>called associative neural networks, which means that everything connects to

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:28.159
<v Speaker 1>other things based on how they relate. So if I

0:18:28.200 --> 0:18:31.560
<v Speaker 1>ask you to think of a mouse that's physically connected

0:18:31.600 --> 0:18:34.919
<v Speaker 1>in your brain's networks to your concept of cheese or

0:18:34.960 --> 0:18:38.919
<v Speaker 1>exterminators or mickey mouse or mazes, or running wheels, or

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 1>mouse traps or pet stores everything else you've ever associated

0:18:43.560 --> 0:18:48.360
<v Speaker 1>with a mouse. So all concepts are related and linked

0:18:48.400 --> 0:18:53.280
<v Speaker 1>physically to what happens during sleep and dreaming. Well, the

0:18:53.400 --> 0:18:57.199
<v Speaker 1>synapses that are used during the day tend to be

0:18:57.480 --> 0:19:01.560
<v Speaker 1>slightly more chemically active, say, they're more hot from the

0:19:01.600 --> 0:19:05.440
<v Speaker 1>activity of the day, and so your dreams usually involve

0:19:05.880 --> 0:19:08.200
<v Speaker 1>something from the day or something that's on your mind.

0:19:08.600 --> 0:19:13.000
<v Speaker 1>They often involve the memories and desires and fears and

0:19:13.119 --> 0:19:17.159
<v Speaker 1>hopes that are brewing in your inner life. But the

0:19:17.280 --> 0:19:21.359
<v Speaker 1>associations are much looser. So maybe you have something about

0:19:21.359 --> 0:19:23.840
<v Speaker 1>your boss or something that happened in a class or whatever,

0:19:24.160 --> 0:19:28.000
<v Speaker 1>but the dream quickly goes off in some weird direction.

0:19:28.240 --> 0:19:32.800
<v Speaker 1>The associations are looser, and so we end up dreaming

0:19:32.920 --> 0:19:37.840
<v Speaker 1>stories with looser associations, following paths along the associative neural

0:19:37.880 --> 0:19:41.960
<v Speaker 1>network that we might not otherwise take. But things make sense,

0:19:42.200 --> 0:19:46.359
<v Speaker 1>at least in the light of dream logic. So even

0:19:46.359 --> 0:19:50.520
<v Speaker 1>if the visual cortex is just getting volleys of random activity,

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:53.920
<v Speaker 1>you get meaning out of it. You get some sort

0:19:53.960 --> 0:19:58.200
<v Speaker 1>of story. Now people often wake up and say, no, way,

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:01.480
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't random, That was a metaphor. I'm trying to

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:04.400
<v Speaker 1>decide if I should quit this job, and I had

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:07.200
<v Speaker 1>a dream that I went into the office and the

0:20:07.240 --> 0:20:09.960
<v Speaker 1>floor was tilted at forty five degrees and no matter

0:20:10.000 --> 0:20:12.480
<v Speaker 1>what I did, I kept slipping back down. And that

0:20:12.640 --> 0:20:16.440
<v Speaker 1>was a metaphor about the impossibility of my advancement. There,

0:20:16.600 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 1>that was a sign from my unconscious. Okay, so maybe

0:20:21.359 --> 0:20:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the interesting thing about interpreting the content of dreams is

0:20:25.600 --> 0:20:28.840
<v Speaker 1>that they might be one hundred percent random, but they

0:20:28.880 --> 0:20:32.399
<v Speaker 1>act like a Rorshack blot, which is to say, you

0:20:32.440 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 1>can assign any sort of meaning to them. You remember

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 1>a Rorshack blot, which is where you squish some ink

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:41.320
<v Speaker 1>between two pages, and then you pull the pages apart

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:43.879
<v Speaker 1>and you get some random shape, and you ask people

0:20:43.920 --> 0:20:48.640
<v Speaker 1>to interpret what they're seeing to assign meaning to it.

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 1>And it's easy enough to say, yeah, that looks like

0:20:51.119 --> 0:20:53.520
<v Speaker 1>this thing in my life, maybe this issue that's been

0:20:53.600 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 1>chewing at me. And that's how doctor Rhorshak used this

0:20:56.760 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 1>to determine what had meaning in a person's mind. But

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:04.639
<v Speaker 1>you would never say the blob of ink carried meaning.

0:21:04.760 --> 0:21:08.640
<v Speaker 1>It's all about the imposition of meaning by the viewer.

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:12.720
<v Speaker 1>And this, I suggest could be what happens with dreams

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:17.080
<v Speaker 1>as well. You interpret the ink blob, and that interpretation

0:21:17.680 --> 0:21:20.800
<v Speaker 1>might have significance to your life, but you imposed that

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 1>meaning instead of it being inherent in the dream. Here's

0:21:25.000 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 1>an interesting parallel. Pablo Picasso once said, we all know

0:21:29.920 --> 0:21:33.879
<v Speaker 1>that art is not truth. Art is a lie that

0:21:34.000 --> 0:21:36.840
<v Speaker 1>makes us realize the truth, and that could be the

0:21:36.840 --> 0:21:40.160
<v Speaker 1>same thing with dreams. They are a lie that makes

0:21:40.240 --> 0:21:43.240
<v Speaker 1>us realize the truth. So in this sense, it's the

0:21:43.240 --> 0:21:46.199
<v Speaker 1>same thing. If you're thinking about some problem and you

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:48.920
<v Speaker 1>go to the bookshelf and you pull off any random

0:21:48.920 --> 0:21:51.080
<v Speaker 1>book and turn to a random page and you read

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the sentence. Often it will very tangentially give you some

0:21:56.200 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 1>push to the thing that you're trying to solve. But

0:21:58.840 --> 0:22:01.920
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't mean the awe of the book cared about

0:22:01.960 --> 0:22:05.680
<v Speaker 1>you and wrote that sentence with that future moment in mind.

0:22:05.720 --> 0:22:07.879
<v Speaker 1>It simply tells us that lots of things in the

0:22:07.920 --> 0:22:11.440
<v Speaker 1>world are like lots of other things and can therefore

0:22:11.520 --> 0:22:14.680
<v Speaker 1>be interpreted. And I do just want to add one

0:22:14.720 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 1>more word of caution to the game of dream interpretation.

0:22:18.400 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 1>By the time you turn to the person next to

0:22:20.840 --> 0:22:22.679
<v Speaker 1>you and say, oh my gosh, I just had the

0:22:22.760 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 1>strangest dream and you tell them, you are forced to

0:22:26.880 --> 0:22:30.800
<v Speaker 1>add another layer of narrative scaffolding so that it makes

0:22:30.840 --> 0:22:34.640
<v Speaker 1>sense as a story that you're telling. So a narrative

0:22:34.680 --> 0:22:38.240
<v Speaker 1>that's very thin can seem to have more flesh after

0:22:38.320 --> 0:22:41.800
<v Speaker 1>you've pushed it through your storytelling machinery. In other words,

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:45.399
<v Speaker 1>we layer on narrative structure to give our dreams a

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:48.520
<v Speaker 1>shape that they didn't actually have. And so especially if

0:22:48.520 --> 0:22:51.320
<v Speaker 1>you've had a dream that you've told over and over,

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:54.320
<v Speaker 1>it usually has more of a scaffolding than it actually

0:22:54.560 --> 0:22:59.679
<v Speaker 1>started with. Nonetheless, the content of dreams has always fascinated humans,

0:23:00.080 --> 0:23:05.080
<v Speaker 1>spurring societies to invent cultural uses for dreams in religious

0:23:05.080 --> 0:23:11.000
<v Speaker 1>ceremonies and medicinal practices, or doomed attempts to predict the future.

0:23:12.000 --> 0:23:15.359
<v Speaker 1>Sigmund Freud, who lived decades before modern brain science, he

0:23:15.400 --> 0:23:19.680
<v Speaker 1>thought that dreams provided an inroad into the underlying functions

0:23:19.720 --> 0:23:23.840
<v Speaker 1>of the brain and especially the subconscious. He suggested, as

0:23:23.920 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 1>had many before him, that dreams concealed hidden meanings that

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:32.680
<v Speaker 1>were just at the threshold of breaking through the barrier

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:37.520
<v Speaker 1>to consciousness. More specifically, he proposed that dreams constitute a

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 1>disguised attempt at wish fulfillment. Similarly, Carl Jung positive that

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:48.760
<v Speaker 1>dreams may offset features of a character personality that you

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:52.520
<v Speaker 1>might ignore while you're awake. In general, both those theories

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:56.360
<v Speaker 1>have been criticized because they can't be proven wrong, and

0:23:56.520 --> 0:24:00.960
<v Speaker 1>critics have pointed out that the wish fulfillment interpretation seems

0:24:01.080 --> 0:24:06.320
<v Speaker 1>improbable in view of the recurring nightmares that attend post

0:24:06.359 --> 0:24:09.320
<v Speaker 1>traumatic stress disorder. So I am, of course not the

0:24:09.359 --> 0:24:13.080
<v Speaker 1>first to propose that dreams might have no inherent meaning.

0:24:13.359 --> 0:24:17.080
<v Speaker 1>The psychiatrists j al And Hobson and Robert McCarley suggest

0:24:17.160 --> 0:24:20.040
<v Speaker 1>that dreams may have no meaning at all, and they

0:24:20.080 --> 0:24:23.560
<v Speaker 1>have a model they call the activation synthesis model, which

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:26.840
<v Speaker 1>proposes that random activity from the brain stem goes to

0:24:26.880 --> 0:24:30.120
<v Speaker 1>the cortex, which tries to turn it into motor output.

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:34.040
<v Speaker 1>But given the paralysis of the major muscle groups, the

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:39.560
<v Speaker 1>brain has to explain the paradox between outgoing motor signals

0:24:39.920 --> 0:24:44.879
<v Speaker 1>and a lack of expected sensory feedback. So in this situation,

0:24:45.280 --> 0:24:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the cortex synthesizes an explanation, essentially weaving a story from

0:24:51.600 --> 0:24:56.280
<v Speaker 1>the random inputs. Now Hobson and McCary faced criticism for

0:24:56.359 --> 0:24:59.600
<v Speaker 1>this aspect of their theory because dreams often do have

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:02.920
<v Speaker 1>a relation relationship to life experience. So in that light,

0:25:02.960 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>they made modifications to allow that dream content relates to

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:09.760
<v Speaker 1>memories and fears and desires and hopes and so on,

0:25:10.320 --> 0:25:13.879
<v Speaker 1>but that these provide the background context and not the

0:25:13.920 --> 0:25:19.120
<v Speaker 1>exact content of the cortexas interpretation of the random activity.

0:25:19.520 --> 0:25:22.359
<v Speaker 1>So which is it, Does dream content tell us anything

0:25:22.400 --> 0:25:25.440
<v Speaker 1>at all? Or nothing? Well, here's how we can approach

0:25:25.520 --> 0:25:29.199
<v Speaker 1>the problem. When you look at one person's dreams like

0:25:29.240 --> 0:25:31.359
<v Speaker 1>you think about your own dreams, you may not be

0:25:31.440 --> 0:25:34.560
<v Speaker 1>able to use the content as a key to unlock

0:25:34.720 --> 0:25:37.840
<v Speaker 1>much about the brain. But as you move from considering

0:25:38.000 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 1>one dreamer to doing the science and looking at thousands

0:25:42.280 --> 0:25:45.120
<v Speaker 1>of dream reports and hundreds of thousands from all over

0:25:45.160 --> 0:25:48.520
<v Speaker 1>the world, you can start to see the fence lines.

0:25:48.880 --> 0:25:53.119
<v Speaker 1>You see that dreams aren't a wild unleashing where anything

0:25:53.160 --> 0:25:58.000
<v Speaker 1>can happen. Instead, dreams have particular rules to the stories,

0:25:58.359 --> 0:26:01.680
<v Speaker 1>and that gives us hints. So what are those rules? Well,

0:26:01.720 --> 0:26:03.639
<v Speaker 1>I recently read a very cool new book by my

0:26:03.680 --> 0:26:07.240
<v Speaker 1>colleague Rahul John day Al called This Is Why You Dream,

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:10.639
<v Speaker 1>and he outlines a series of studies that demonstrate a

0:26:10.760 --> 0:26:16.720
<v Speaker 1>remarkable consistency of themes. Across cultures and across decades, the

0:26:16.880 --> 0:26:21.920
<v Speaker 1>same kinds of dreams are reported, for example, being unable

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:25.240
<v Speaker 1>to find one's way or being late for an important event.

0:26:25.600 --> 0:26:29.760
<v Speaker 1>In dreams, both men and women usually experience more aggression

0:26:29.840 --> 0:26:33.439
<v Speaker 1>than friendliness, although men in almost all societies have greater

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:37.000
<v Speaker 1>physical aggression in their dreams than women do. Everyone experiences

0:26:37.040 --> 0:26:41.400
<v Speaker 1>more misfortune than good fortune. People experience more negative emotions

0:26:41.440 --> 0:26:45.520
<v Speaker 1>than positive emotions. So the cross cultural research suggests that

0:26:45.720 --> 0:26:49.159
<v Speaker 1>dreams are similar across a wide range of cultures in

0:26:49.200 --> 0:26:52.720
<v Speaker 1>terms of the subject matter, the level of aggression, familiarity

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:55.040
<v Speaker 1>with the people in the dreams. For example, let me

0:26:55.119 --> 0:26:57.960
<v Speaker 1>zoom in on this. Jandeal points out that in the

0:26:58.040 --> 0:27:01.800
<v Speaker 1>nineteen fifties there were ques given to college students in

0:27:01.840 --> 0:27:05.399
<v Speaker 1>America and college students in Japan, and the questionnaire asked

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:09.000
<v Speaker 1>them what they had dreamt about, like showing up somewhere

0:27:09.040 --> 0:27:11.680
<v Speaker 1>with no clothes or flying or trying to do something

0:27:11.680 --> 0:27:15.280
<v Speaker 1>again and again, or being buried alive, or something involving

0:27:15.359 --> 0:27:18.280
<v Speaker 1>school and their teachers or whatever. And as it turns out,

0:27:18.320 --> 0:27:22.360
<v Speaker 1>although American and Japanese students were living pretty different lives,

0:27:22.440 --> 0:27:26.400
<v Speaker 1>their answers were essentially the same. So for the Americans,

0:27:26.720 --> 0:27:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the top five dreams were falling, being attacked or pursued,

0:27:32.400 --> 0:27:35.960
<v Speaker 1>trying again and again to do something, a dream involving

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:40.680
<v Speaker 1>school or teachers, or studying, and sexual experiences. And when

0:27:40.680 --> 0:27:43.280
<v Speaker 1>you compare this to the Japanese students, it was essentially

0:27:43.280 --> 0:27:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the same. Their dreams were ranked as being attacked or pursued, falling,

0:27:48.280 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 1>trying again and again to do something, dreams about school

0:27:51.640 --> 0:27:54.760
<v Speaker 1>or teachers or studying, and being frozen with fright, and

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:58.720
<v Speaker 1>sexual experiences were number six. So halfway across the world,

0:27:58.880 --> 0:28:20.439
<v Speaker 1>very different cultures, same dream content. Now, fifty years after

0:28:20.480 --> 0:28:23.800
<v Speaker 1>that study, similar questions were given to students in China

0:28:23.960 --> 0:28:26.359
<v Speaker 1>and Germany, and they came up with the century the

0:28:26.400 --> 0:28:30.639
<v Speaker 1>same answers. Again, you find people dreaming of being chaste,

0:28:30.720 --> 0:28:33.800
<v Speaker 1>or pursued, or arriving too late, like missing an airplane

0:28:33.880 --> 0:28:36.080
<v Speaker 1>or a final exam. Now you might say, fine, but

0:28:36.119 --> 0:28:38.959
<v Speaker 1>these are all industrialized countries and maybe their lives are

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:41.840
<v Speaker 1>sort of similar. But in fact people have also studied

0:28:41.960 --> 0:28:46.240
<v Speaker 1>indigenous societies in Brazil and Mexico and Australia and they

0:28:46.280 --> 0:28:51.160
<v Speaker 1>find extremely similar results. The cultures are quite different. But

0:28:51.320 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 1>the plots of the dreams are not. So there have

0:28:55.000 --> 0:28:56.920
<v Speaker 1>been lots of studies on this sort of thing now,

0:28:56.920 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 1>and they all conclude that dream content is a century

0:29:00.120 --> 0:29:04.320
<v Speaker 1>same across cultures and across time. As one example, wherever

0:29:04.360 --> 0:29:07.680
<v Speaker 1>you are in the world, men dream more about other men,

0:29:07.800 --> 0:29:11.400
<v Speaker 1>while women dream equally of men and women, and all

0:29:11.480 --> 0:29:14.920
<v Speaker 1>people across cultures are more likely to be victims of

0:29:15.040 --> 0:29:20.800
<v Speaker 1>violence rather than perpetrators. So dreams cover similar themes across

0:29:20.800 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the world, irrespective of language and culture and time. It

0:29:24.200 --> 0:29:26.720
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem to matter how rich you are, how poor

0:29:26.760 --> 0:29:29.080
<v Speaker 1>you are. So what does that mean? Well, what's the

0:29:29.080 --> 0:29:32.200
<v Speaker 1>one thing we all have in common? Our organs on

0:29:32.240 --> 0:29:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the inside and specifically the brain. As easy as it

0:29:35.560 --> 0:29:37.800
<v Speaker 1>is to look at different cultures around the world, with

0:29:37.880 --> 0:29:42.640
<v Speaker 1>different governments and different religions and different costumes, this variability

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:46.000
<v Speaker 1>has cropped up in the last millisecond of human history.

0:29:46.320 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 1>And if you look just under the skin and the bone,

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:51.400
<v Speaker 1>you find the same brain in us all. It's the

0:29:51.440 --> 0:29:55.160
<v Speaker 1>same engine under the hood. So whenever we find something

0:29:55.280 --> 0:29:59.640
<v Speaker 1>clear like oh, everyone dreams about the same thing, that

0:30:00.600 --> 0:30:05.120
<v Speaker 1>we are looking at something fundamental and ancient and universal,

0:30:05.440 --> 0:30:07.920
<v Speaker 1>and we find all sorts of other interesting answers by

0:30:07.920 --> 0:30:11.840
<v Speaker 1>looking across thousands of dreams. For example, what if dreams

0:30:11.880 --> 0:30:15.320
<v Speaker 1>are a way to live out fantasies like sexual fantasy.

0:30:15.600 --> 0:30:19.240
<v Speaker 1>That seems consistent with how we talk about dreams a

0:30:19.320 --> 0:30:23.320
<v Speaker 1>way of acting out our desires. But in studies across

0:30:23.320 --> 0:30:26.760
<v Speaker 1>all cultures, it turns out that fewer than ten percent

0:30:26.800 --> 0:30:29.840
<v Speaker 1>of dreams are sexual, which I find fascinating given the

0:30:29.840 --> 0:30:34.080
<v Speaker 1>way we talk about dreams. If a young single person

0:30:34.160 --> 0:30:36.720
<v Speaker 1>says to another single person, oh, I had a dream

0:30:36.760 --> 0:30:40.440
<v Speaker 1>about you last night, then everyone titters, makes assumptions about that,

0:30:40.800 --> 0:30:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and we have terms like dream girl or dream guide,

0:30:44.200 --> 0:30:47.760
<v Speaker 1>But in fact, ninety percent of our dreams have nothing

0:30:47.800 --> 0:30:51.240
<v Speaker 1>to do with that. So the content is remarkably similar

0:30:51.280 --> 0:30:54.440
<v Speaker 1>across the world. But where things get really interesting is

0:30:54.480 --> 0:30:58.320
<v Speaker 1>when we zoom in one more level and really examine

0:30:58.320 --> 0:31:01.760
<v Speaker 1>what dreamscapes look like like in detail. And I'm not

0:31:01.840 --> 0:31:05.239
<v Speaker 1>asking about what's in the dream script here, but if

0:31:05.240 --> 0:31:08.080
<v Speaker 1>you look very closely across thousands of dream reports, you

0:31:08.120 --> 0:31:11.760
<v Speaker 1>can ask what is not in the script. So I

0:31:11.800 --> 0:31:14.240
<v Speaker 1>want to return to a question I posed at the beginning,

0:31:14.320 --> 0:31:16.840
<v Speaker 1>which is that we live in a society where we

0:31:16.880 --> 0:31:20.680
<v Speaker 1>are constantly hunched over our cell phones and our laptops.

0:31:20.920 --> 0:31:24.360
<v Speaker 1>How come these essentially never show up in our dreams?

0:31:24.440 --> 0:31:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Isn't that weird? And even in the era before computers,

0:31:27.880 --> 0:31:30.240
<v Speaker 1>back when people read a lot more books, how come

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:34.480
<v Speaker 1>no one sits around reading books in their dreams. Why

0:31:34.520 --> 0:31:37.600
<v Speaker 1>can't you even see any text in your dreams? Why

0:31:37.600 --> 0:31:41.040
<v Speaker 1>do you spend so much time writing stuff down in

0:31:41.080 --> 0:31:44.200
<v Speaker 1>real life but you never can write stuff down in

0:31:44.280 --> 0:31:47.280
<v Speaker 1>a dream. How come you never do math in a dream,

0:31:47.680 --> 0:31:50.800
<v Speaker 1>like calculating a tip for a restaurant bill, Even if

0:31:50.880 --> 0:31:53.200
<v Speaker 1>that comes up in a dream plot, it feels totally

0:31:53.200 --> 0:31:57.200
<v Speaker 1>impossible to get the right answer. Well, all of this

0:31:57.320 --> 0:32:00.880
<v Speaker 1>serves as a big clue into the networks that are

0:32:01.000 --> 0:32:04.120
<v Speaker 1>active during a dream, and this is pretty well worked

0:32:04.160 --> 0:32:07.280
<v Speaker 1>out with brain imaging now, although anyone who is being

0:32:07.400 --> 0:32:10.560
<v Speaker 1>very observant probably could have guessed this all even a

0:32:10.600 --> 0:32:14.160
<v Speaker 1>century ago. What reading and writing, and cell phones and

0:32:14.200 --> 0:32:17.320
<v Speaker 1>computers all have in common is that they require the

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:20.200
<v Speaker 1>use of a network in the brain that we summarize

0:32:20.240 --> 0:32:24.160
<v Speaker 1>as the executive network, which involves a lot of activity

0:32:24.280 --> 0:32:27.640
<v Speaker 1>largely distributed in the frontal lobes and the parietal lobes,

0:32:27.960 --> 0:32:32.400
<v Speaker 1>and you need this for rule based problem solving and

0:32:32.720 --> 0:32:35.520
<v Speaker 1>for making decisions when you've got a particular goal in

0:32:35.560 --> 0:32:37.840
<v Speaker 1>front of you that you're trying to solve. And the

0:32:37.960 --> 0:32:42.280
<v Speaker 1>key is that activity in the executive network is reduced.

0:32:42.320 --> 0:32:46.640
<v Speaker 1>I'll just say it's shut down while you are dreaming,

0:32:46.960 --> 0:32:49.880
<v Speaker 1>so you're not able to read and write and launch

0:32:49.920 --> 0:32:51.800
<v Speaker 1>an app on your cell phone screen and so on,

0:32:51.880 --> 0:32:56.320
<v Speaker 1>because that work requires the executive network, and that network

0:32:56.480 --> 0:32:59.600
<v Speaker 1>is off duty for the night. But what is on

0:32:59.760 --> 0:33:04.320
<v Speaker 1>is an network we summarize as the default mode network,

0:33:04.640 --> 0:33:07.720
<v Speaker 1>which is what kindles to life when you shut your

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:11.520
<v Speaker 1>eyes and you're not involved in gathering information and acting

0:33:11.560 --> 0:33:15.120
<v Speaker 1>on some other task. So this is called the default

0:33:15.200 --> 0:33:20.240
<v Speaker 1>mode network, but many scientists are renaming this the imagination

0:33:20.480 --> 0:33:25.520
<v Speaker 1>network because this is what lets your storehouse of experiences fly.

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:29.360
<v Speaker 1>You can piece ideas together and come up with new

0:33:29.720 --> 0:33:34.000
<v Speaker 1>hypotheses and thoughts, and this is what's firing on all

0:33:34.240 --> 0:33:39.000
<v Speaker 1>cylinders when you dream. So the executive network has reduced,

0:33:39.160 --> 0:33:42.760
<v Speaker 1>the imagination network is enhanced, and this is what gives

0:33:42.880 --> 0:33:47.520
<v Speaker 1>dreams their very untethered character. There are other clues you

0:33:47.520 --> 0:33:51.720
<v Speaker 1>can also gather from looking at detailed dream reports, which

0:33:51.760 --> 0:33:55.440
<v Speaker 1>is that sometimes objects will turn into other objects, but

0:33:55.480 --> 0:33:58.800
<v Speaker 1>they're always related in some way. What I mean is

0:33:58.880 --> 0:34:02.800
<v Speaker 1>you might have your bicycle turn into a motorcycle, or

0:34:02.920 --> 0:34:07.880
<v Speaker 1>your small house becomes a mansion, or the cafeteria becomes

0:34:07.920 --> 0:34:11.759
<v Speaker 1>a restaurant, or the hammer becomes a screwdriver, but you

0:34:11.920 --> 0:34:16.160
<v Speaker 1>don't find the bicycle turning into a restaurant or your

0:34:16.239 --> 0:34:20.120
<v Speaker 1>house turning into a hammer. What does that tell us? Well,

0:34:20.200 --> 0:34:23.920
<v Speaker 1>under the hood, we have what are known as semantic maps,

0:34:24.480 --> 0:34:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and more than associations, which I mentioned before, semantic maps

0:34:29.120 --> 0:34:31.239
<v Speaker 1>refer to the way that all the stuff in your

0:34:31.280 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 1>brain is laid out in terms of relationships between concepts.

0:34:35.800 --> 0:34:39.560
<v Speaker 1>For example, in your semantic map, you have the concept

0:34:39.600 --> 0:34:43.920
<v Speaker 1>of an animal, which might include categories like mammals and

0:34:43.920 --> 0:34:46.759
<v Speaker 1>birds and reptiles and so on, and within one of

0:34:46.800 --> 0:34:50.600
<v Speaker 1>those categories you might have more specific concepts like dog

0:34:50.640 --> 0:34:53.719
<v Speaker 1>and cat and eagle and salmon and snake and frog

0:34:53.800 --> 0:34:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and so on. Things are laid out in your brain

0:34:56.080 --> 0:34:59.719
<v Speaker 1>based on their conceptual meaning. And what we find is

0:34:59.760 --> 0:35:04.120
<v Speaker 1>that dreams follow the semantic maps. In other words, they

0:35:04.120 --> 0:35:07.960
<v Speaker 1>stay local in the little clusters of the maps. So

0:35:08.080 --> 0:35:10.719
<v Speaker 1>this is why you see the bicycle turning into the

0:35:10.760 --> 0:35:14.840
<v Speaker 1>motorcycle because they're both forms of transportation, but not into

0:35:15.280 --> 0:35:18.080
<v Speaker 1>the screwdriver, which is a tool and in a totally

0:35:18.080 --> 0:35:22.960
<v Speaker 1>different category. These things live in different little neighborhoods of

0:35:23.000 --> 0:35:27.040
<v Speaker 1>the semantic map. So again, a careful look at dream

0:35:27.080 --> 0:35:30.680
<v Speaker 1>reports tells us important clues about what is going on

0:35:31.000 --> 0:35:33.799
<v Speaker 1>under the hood, and that tells us that while the

0:35:33.800 --> 0:35:37.759
<v Speaker 1>themes are universal strife and falling and attempting to do

0:35:37.800 --> 0:35:41.200
<v Speaker 1>something over and over, the details are filled in with

0:35:41.280 --> 0:35:45.360
<v Speaker 1>the specifics of your semantic maps. And this all brings

0:35:45.400 --> 0:35:47.920
<v Speaker 1>me back around to a question I had since I

0:35:48.000 --> 0:35:52.240
<v Speaker 1>was a kid about whether dreams are experienced in black

0:35:52.280 --> 0:35:55.000
<v Speaker 1>and white or in color. Now. When I was a child,

0:35:55.480 --> 0:35:57.799
<v Speaker 1>I remember at some point that my parents told me

0:35:58.280 --> 0:36:01.400
<v Speaker 1>that we dream in black and white, and I was

0:36:01.440 --> 0:36:03.920
<v Speaker 1>confused by this because I didn't seem to dream in

0:36:03.960 --> 0:36:06.319
<v Speaker 1>black and white. As far as I could tell, my

0:36:06.520 --> 0:36:09.160
<v Speaker 1>dreams were in color, so I thought I must be

0:36:09.239 --> 0:36:13.760
<v Speaker 1>somehow assessing that incorrectly. Because they were both very smart

0:36:13.800 --> 0:36:16.959
<v Speaker 1>and educated. My mother was a biology teacher, my father

0:36:17.040 --> 0:36:19.920
<v Speaker 1>was a medical doctor, and as I grew older, I

0:36:19.960 --> 0:36:22.720
<v Speaker 1>asked my friends about this, but I couldn't find anyone

0:36:22.719 --> 0:36:26.279
<v Speaker 1>who thought that their dreams were not in color. Now,

0:36:26.360 --> 0:36:29.239
<v Speaker 1>because I genuinely knew that my parents were brilliant, I

0:36:29.280 --> 0:36:32.920
<v Speaker 1>thought maybe there was something they knew that I didn't like.

0:36:33.040 --> 0:36:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Maybe we were dreaming in black and white but didn't

0:36:35.719 --> 0:36:39.280
<v Speaker 1>realize it. And then I found several large scale surveys

0:36:39.320 --> 0:36:43.000
<v Speaker 1>that reported what my parents had said, that most people

0:36:43.080 --> 0:36:46.240
<v Speaker 1>dream in black and white. One study was from nineteen

0:36:46.320 --> 0:36:48.840
<v Speaker 1>fifty eight and they said only nine percent of people

0:36:48.960 --> 0:36:52.000
<v Speaker 1>dream in color, and a paper in nineteen forty two

0:36:52.040 --> 0:36:55.960
<v Speaker 1>reported that only ten percent claimed to frequently or very

0:36:55.960 --> 0:36:59.000
<v Speaker 1>frequently dream in color, and a report in nineteen fifty

0:36:59.000 --> 0:37:02.120
<v Speaker 1>one had the highest percentage. They said that twenty nine

0:37:02.160 --> 0:37:05.359
<v Speaker 1>percent of dreams are in color. But even this didn't

0:37:05.400 --> 0:37:09.400
<v Speaker 1>make things clear what was going on, because dream reports

0:37:09.480 --> 0:37:13.760
<v Speaker 1>from earlier, like Freud's reports of dreams in nineteen hundred,

0:37:14.480 --> 0:37:19.120
<v Speaker 1>often had explicit color descriptions in them. So somehow it

0:37:19.280 --> 0:37:24.759
<v Speaker 1>seemed to be only my parents' generation that dreamed in

0:37:24.880 --> 0:37:27.560
<v Speaker 1>black and white. And it turns out if you run

0:37:27.560 --> 0:37:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the study now, almost everyone says they dream in color.

0:37:32.040 --> 0:37:34.799
<v Speaker 1>As you may have guessed by now. The hypothesis on

0:37:34.840 --> 0:37:39.000
<v Speaker 1>this is that people were influenced by watching black and

0:37:39.040 --> 0:37:42.120
<v Speaker 1>white television and black and white movies and black and

0:37:42.120 --> 0:37:47.319
<v Speaker 1>white photographs, and once the technology changed to color, then

0:37:47.440 --> 0:37:50.880
<v Speaker 1>so did dreams. I'm putting a very nice paper by

0:37:51.000 --> 0:37:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Eric Schwitzkeebel on my site that compiles all these studies

0:37:54.560 --> 0:37:58.120
<v Speaker 1>through the years and the change in the reports. Again,

0:37:58.160 --> 0:38:01.600
<v Speaker 1>this demonstrates that the content of our dreams has to

0:38:01.640 --> 0:38:05.359
<v Speaker 1>do with the experiences that we have now. I'll tell

0:38:05.360 --> 0:38:07.440
<v Speaker 1>you an interesting side note on this. I happened to

0:38:07.440 --> 0:38:11.120
<v Speaker 1>live in California and during COVID, everyone in my neighborhood

0:38:11.160 --> 0:38:13.480
<v Speaker 1>wore masks, and it was a very weird time, and

0:38:13.520 --> 0:38:16.279
<v Speaker 1>so we rarely saw other human beings for a couple

0:38:16.360 --> 0:38:19.360
<v Speaker 1>of years without everyone being in masks. And one of

0:38:19.440 --> 0:38:21.799
<v Speaker 1>the things I remember from that time was that we

0:38:21.800 --> 0:38:24.640
<v Speaker 1>would sometimes watch a movie on TV, and it was

0:38:24.680 --> 0:38:27.640
<v Speaker 1>so shocking that people in the movie would push their

0:38:27.680 --> 0:38:30.080
<v Speaker 1>way through a dense crowd and sit so close to

0:38:30.160 --> 0:38:32.880
<v Speaker 1>their friends and the people they were talking with, and

0:38:32.920 --> 0:38:36.600
<v Speaker 1>they were indoors with such density. And it became in

0:38:36.680 --> 0:38:39.839
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty so noticeable and so shocking when we were

0:38:39.840 --> 0:38:42.839
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of COVID. Interestingly, it's a little hard

0:38:42.840 --> 0:38:45.160
<v Speaker 1>to remember that now, but I remember it well because

0:38:45.200 --> 0:38:47.399
<v Speaker 1>I was taking careful notes on what was going on

0:38:47.920 --> 0:38:52.080
<v Speaker 1>with my dreams during this time, and specifically, since my

0:38:52.320 --> 0:38:55.800
<v Speaker 1>real life involved the very thinned out crowds and everyone

0:38:55.840 --> 0:38:59.080
<v Speaker 1>in masks, did that show up in my dreams? And

0:38:59.120 --> 0:39:03.040
<v Speaker 1>the answer was is no. The thing that struck me

0:39:03.080 --> 0:39:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the entire time during lockdown is that my dreams were

0:39:06.719 --> 0:39:09.480
<v Speaker 1>totally normal. In my dreams, I was at a big

0:39:09.520 --> 0:39:11.440
<v Speaker 1>party and there were lots of people around, and no

0:39:11.440 --> 0:39:14.600
<v Speaker 1>one ever had masks in my dreams, which struck me

0:39:14.680 --> 0:39:16.799
<v Speaker 1>as weird when I would wake up. Why didn't my

0:39:16.920 --> 0:39:21.680
<v Speaker 1>dreams reflect my daily experience? Now, this is just a

0:39:21.719 --> 0:39:24.680
<v Speaker 1>single person's report, and I didn't think to study this

0:39:24.760 --> 0:39:27.160
<v Speaker 1>carefully at the time by doing a big online survey

0:39:27.200 --> 0:39:30.360
<v Speaker 1>of everyone. But if it's generally true that other people

0:39:30.360 --> 0:39:34.799
<v Speaker 1>were having these very salient daily experiences of lockdown and

0:39:34.880 --> 0:39:38.600
<v Speaker 1>masks and yet it wasn't appearing in their dreams, the

0:39:38.640 --> 0:39:41.839
<v Speaker 1>only interpretation I can make is that our dreams reflect

0:39:42.000 --> 0:39:46.800
<v Speaker 1>pathways that get laid down over our youth when we're young.

0:39:47.440 --> 0:39:50.200
<v Speaker 1>And if that's the case, then maybe we could still

0:39:50.320 --> 0:39:54.439
<v Speaker 1>find some black and white dreaming among older people. Now,

0:39:54.560 --> 0:39:57.799
<v Speaker 1>in other words, maybe you'd still see some of that now,

0:39:58.160 --> 0:40:01.799
<v Speaker 1>even though those people have been watching color television for

0:40:01.920 --> 0:40:04.439
<v Speaker 1>sixty years. Now, with all the things on my plate,

0:40:04.480 --> 0:40:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not going to have time to pull off that study.

0:40:06.600 --> 0:40:09.279
<v Speaker 1>But I would love it if listeners could ask their

0:40:09.360 --> 0:40:13.360
<v Speaker 1>oldest living relatives they a parent, or grandparent or great grandparent,

0:40:13.800 --> 0:40:18.640
<v Speaker 1>how they dream and determine if anyone still dreams in

0:40:18.719 --> 0:40:36.960
<v Speaker 1>black and white and what their age is. Okay, so

0:40:37.040 --> 0:40:40.080
<v Speaker 1>that story of black and white dreaming correlated with black

0:40:40.120 --> 0:40:42.880
<v Speaker 1>and white television. That seems like a clean story, But

0:40:42.920 --> 0:40:45.600
<v Speaker 1>there's one thing that still bugs me about it. Although

0:40:45.840 --> 0:40:49.399
<v Speaker 1>television and movies were in black and white, obviously the

0:40:49.440 --> 0:40:53.240
<v Speaker 1>world wasn't. When my parents walked outside, they saw green

0:40:53.320 --> 0:40:56.960
<v Speaker 1>trees and blue skies and red cardinals and yellow sunflowers

0:40:57.000 --> 0:41:01.279
<v Speaker 1>and so on. So why didn't their dreams reflect that? Well,

0:41:01.320 --> 0:41:03.719
<v Speaker 1>there are two things to say here. First, not everyone

0:41:03.800 --> 0:41:06.480
<v Speaker 1>dreamed in black and white. Instead, it was between let's

0:41:06.520 --> 0:41:09.560
<v Speaker 1>say seventy to ninety percent. So had I been alive

0:41:09.560 --> 0:41:11.800
<v Speaker 1>in the nineteen fifties, I would have studied the issue

0:41:11.840 --> 0:41:15.400
<v Speaker 1>of how many hours of television people watched each day,

0:41:15.680 --> 0:41:17.839
<v Speaker 1>and perhaps some measure of how many black and white

0:41:17.840 --> 0:41:20.400
<v Speaker 1>movies they saw on how many newspapers with black and

0:41:20.400 --> 0:41:23.439
<v Speaker 1>white photos and so on, and correlated that to whether

0:41:23.560 --> 0:41:26.440
<v Speaker 1>or not they had black and white dreams. Second, I

0:41:26.480 --> 0:41:29.880
<v Speaker 1>have a totally speculative hypothesis. I don't have any evidence

0:41:29.920 --> 0:41:31.960
<v Speaker 1>for this, but I'm going to say it anyway. What

0:41:32.200 --> 0:41:35.760
<v Speaker 1>if some part of the brain knows, at least in part,

0:41:36.440 --> 0:41:40.279
<v Speaker 1>that dreams are like a fake movie, and in that

0:41:40.360 --> 0:41:43.799
<v Speaker 1>way it takes on the property of fiction, which in

0:41:43.840 --> 0:41:46.719
<v Speaker 1>those days was black and white. Because note that even

0:41:46.800 --> 0:41:49.359
<v Speaker 1>when you're in the middle of a movie, some part

0:41:49.360 --> 0:41:51.719
<v Speaker 1>of your brain still knows you're watching a movie. And

0:41:51.760 --> 0:41:54.560
<v Speaker 1>this is why when the train comes at the camera,

0:41:54.600 --> 0:41:57.839
<v Speaker 1>you don't actually duck and scream. So even though we're

0:41:57.880 --> 0:42:02.160
<v Speaker 1>compelled by fiction, we don't fall for it completely. Could

0:42:02.200 --> 0:42:06.000
<v Speaker 1>it be that to the brain, dreams are more like movies.

0:42:06.760 --> 0:42:09.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, because I missed that era, so the

0:42:09.320 --> 0:42:13.000
<v Speaker 1>opportunity seems gone to study that. But I'm wondering if

0:42:13.040 --> 0:42:16.120
<v Speaker 1>we're going to have another shot at studying this question

0:42:16.680 --> 0:42:21.080
<v Speaker 1>once virtual reality becomes ubiquitous and pervasive, and whether a

0:42:21.160 --> 0:42:24.719
<v Speaker 1>big chunk of the population will report dreams that are

0:42:24.760 --> 0:42:29.840
<v Speaker 1>more like synthesized virtual reality worlds than like our daily life.

0:42:29.880 --> 0:42:33.239
<v Speaker 1>To me, this would shed light on the mystery of

0:42:33.320 --> 0:42:36.399
<v Speaker 1>the black and white dreams and the details by which

0:42:36.440 --> 0:42:41.960
<v Speaker 1>your dreams are determined by your experiences in the world. Now,

0:42:42.000 --> 0:42:44.759
<v Speaker 1>there's still lots of stuff that I think we don't understand.

0:42:44.880 --> 0:42:49.719
<v Speaker 1>One is why we can have false, implanted memories inside

0:42:49.719 --> 0:42:52.280
<v Speaker 1>a dream. This is something I've wondered about for years.

0:42:52.640 --> 0:42:55.440
<v Speaker 1>For example, I had a dream many years ago about

0:42:55.480 --> 0:42:58.840
<v Speaker 1>my brother's wedding and he was yelling at me and saying,

0:42:59.160 --> 0:43:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I can't believe you said that to Jenny and ruined

0:43:01.800 --> 0:43:04.560
<v Speaker 1>my wedding, and I felt horrible. I felt as guilty

0:43:04.560 --> 0:43:06.759
<v Speaker 1>as I ever felt. Why did I do that? Why

0:43:06.880 --> 0:43:10.040
<v Speaker 1>was I so insensitive? And then I woke up. As

0:43:10.080 --> 0:43:12.080
<v Speaker 1>it turns out, my brother had a lovely wedding that

0:43:12.120 --> 0:43:14.760
<v Speaker 1>went just perfectly, and I of course never said anything

0:43:14.840 --> 0:43:18.399
<v Speaker 1>bad to his bride, my lovely sister in law Jenny. Ever,

0:43:18.520 --> 0:43:21.520
<v Speaker 1>there was never trouble of any sort there. So why

0:43:21.520 --> 0:43:24.600
<v Speaker 1>did I fall for the false memory? Why couldn't I

0:43:24.680 --> 0:43:27.799
<v Speaker 1>access my real memories of the wedding while I was

0:43:27.960 --> 0:43:32.080
<v Speaker 1>inside the dream? In other words, the issue is that

0:43:32.200 --> 0:43:35.360
<v Speaker 1>not only did I have a false memory. But also

0:43:35.400 --> 0:43:38.680
<v Speaker 1>I had no access to my real memory of the wedding.

0:43:39.400 --> 0:43:42.680
<v Speaker 1>One set of memories was replaced by another. And this

0:43:42.719 --> 0:43:45.839
<v Speaker 1>is what freaks me out, not just about dreams, but

0:43:45.920 --> 0:43:51.239
<v Speaker 1>about our sense of reality. We buy whatever our brains

0:43:51.480 --> 0:43:54.560
<v Speaker 1>serve up to us at every moment. We buy the

0:43:54.680 --> 0:43:58.080
<v Speaker 1>plot of a dream completely. And by the way, this

0:43:58.160 --> 0:44:02.000
<v Speaker 1>is one interpretation of what happened in schizophrenia. The way

0:44:02.040 --> 0:44:06.160
<v Speaker 1>psychiatrists used to describe this about a century ago is

0:44:06.160 --> 0:44:11.160
<v Speaker 1>that psychosis is essentially an intrusion of the dream state

0:44:11.360 --> 0:44:14.799
<v Speaker 1>into the waking state. So the next time you see

0:44:14.840 --> 0:44:17.640
<v Speaker 1>a man talking to himself on the street and having

0:44:17.719 --> 0:44:20.560
<v Speaker 1>an argument with someone who is not there in front

0:44:20.560 --> 0:44:24.400
<v Speaker 1>of him, interpret it through this lens that he is

0:44:24.480 --> 0:44:29.040
<v Speaker 1>having an awake dream, and you might understand what's happening

0:44:29.200 --> 0:44:31.759
<v Speaker 1>in a fresh way. So what we see here, and

0:44:31.800 --> 0:44:34.080
<v Speaker 1>what we've seen in many of these episodes, is that

0:44:34.120 --> 0:44:38.120
<v Speaker 1>we accept whatever reality is served up to us. And

0:44:38.160 --> 0:44:41.120
<v Speaker 1>by the way, I think this is why literature works

0:44:41.160 --> 0:44:44.880
<v Speaker 1>with our species, because we can so easily adopt a

0:44:44.960 --> 0:44:48.480
<v Speaker 1>different reality. We can read a book and we laugh

0:44:48.560 --> 0:44:54.040
<v Speaker 1>and we weep. We are effortlessly deluded. And to understand

0:44:54.040 --> 0:44:58.000
<v Speaker 1>this I think we shouldn't use the term suspension of disbeliefs.

0:44:58.000 --> 0:45:02.719
<v Speaker 1>It's the wrong term because an applies that disbelief is

0:45:02.840 --> 0:45:06.839
<v Speaker 1>the standard disbelief is the normal operating mode. In fact,

0:45:06.920 --> 0:45:10.320
<v Speaker 1>it might be just the opposite. Our brains are perfectly

0:45:10.440 --> 0:45:15.160
<v Speaker 1>willing to accept whatever they are fed. Now, I want

0:45:15.160 --> 0:45:17.560
<v Speaker 1>to hit one more question in today's episode, which is

0:45:17.680 --> 0:45:22.480
<v Speaker 1>where is dreaming headed? Would it be possible to read

0:45:22.680 --> 0:45:27.320
<v Speaker 1>out the content of somebody's dreams? Well, if you happen

0:45:27.360 --> 0:45:30.080
<v Speaker 1>to have heard my episode number twenty seven, you'll know

0:45:30.160 --> 0:45:33.880
<v Speaker 1>that the answer is already yes, at least to some degree.

0:45:34.360 --> 0:45:37.240
<v Speaker 1>Different research groups have been working since at least twenty

0:45:37.239 --> 0:45:40.160
<v Speaker 1>eleven to see if they can measure brain activity in

0:45:40.160 --> 0:45:44.200
<v Speaker 1>the visual cortex to assess what somebody is seeing in

0:45:44.239 --> 0:45:46.880
<v Speaker 1>front of their eyes. In other words, if you're looking

0:45:47.120 --> 0:45:50.280
<v Speaker 1>at a building, there's a different activity in your visual

0:45:50.320 --> 0:45:52.920
<v Speaker 1>cortex than if you're looking at a puppy or a

0:45:52.920 --> 0:45:55.240
<v Speaker 1>cup of coffee and so on, and so the research

0:45:55.400 --> 0:45:58.560
<v Speaker 1>question is can you tell what a person is seeing

0:45:58.880 --> 0:46:01.520
<v Speaker 1>just by measuring the pasterns in their visual cortex? And

0:46:01.560 --> 0:46:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the answer is that you can pretty well tell what

0:46:04.520 --> 0:46:07.799
<v Speaker 1>somebody is seeing this way. After that research came out,

0:46:08.320 --> 0:46:12.680
<v Speaker 1>people realized we might be able to measure dreams because

0:46:12.760 --> 0:46:16.919
<v Speaker 1>dreams are activity in the primary visual cortex. Dreams are

0:46:16.960 --> 0:46:22.040
<v Speaker 1>experienced as visual because it's activity in the visual cortex,

0:46:22.080 --> 0:46:26.560
<v Speaker 1>and your brain understands that as visual experience. So Yuki

0:46:26.680 --> 0:46:29.480
<v Speaker 1>also Comma Tani and his colleagues published a paper a

0:46:29.520 --> 0:46:32.920
<v Speaker 1>few years ago in which he took this same approach.

0:46:32.960 --> 0:46:35.200
<v Speaker 1>He had people look at a bunch of pictures and

0:46:35.239 --> 0:46:37.160
<v Speaker 1>watch a bunch of videos while they were in the

0:46:37.200 --> 0:46:41.000
<v Speaker 1>brain scanner, and then he used machine learning to decode

0:46:41.480 --> 0:46:45.160
<v Speaker 1>how the picture out there corresponds to the activity patterns

0:46:45.200 --> 0:46:48.640
<v Speaker 1>in the brain. And now you let people go to

0:46:48.840 --> 0:46:52.680
<v Speaker 1>sleep in the scanner, and you measure their visual cortex,

0:46:53.080 --> 0:46:56.040
<v Speaker 1>and you use the machine learning model to decode what

0:46:56.120 --> 0:46:59.680
<v Speaker 1>that activity would correspond to, in other words, what they

0:46:59.760 --> 0:47:04.880
<v Speaker 1>were presumably seeing in their dream. And once the machine

0:47:04.920 --> 0:47:07.400
<v Speaker 1>learning model gives an answer, then you can make a

0:47:07.440 --> 0:47:11.880
<v Speaker 1>little video reconstruction of their dream, and you can watch

0:47:11.960 --> 0:47:17.279
<v Speaker 1>what presumably was the experience for the dreamer, albeit with

0:47:17.440 --> 0:47:22.000
<v Speaker 1>very low resolution. Now, when you're decoding pictures or videos,

0:47:22.040 --> 0:47:24.319
<v Speaker 1>it's easier to know if you're getting it right. When

0:47:24.360 --> 0:47:28.400
<v Speaker 1>you're decoding dreaming, it's harder to know for sure that

0:47:28.440 --> 0:47:30.960
<v Speaker 1>you got the right answer. You have to wake up

0:47:31.000 --> 0:47:33.880
<v Speaker 1>your participants and say, hey, what do you remember, and

0:47:33.920 --> 0:47:36.439
<v Speaker 1>then you compare that to what you think you might

0:47:36.560 --> 0:47:39.880
<v Speaker 1>have decoded. But even with those caveats, this gives the

0:47:40.000 --> 0:47:44.719
<v Speaker 1>rough start to a dream decoder that could tell you

0:47:44.920 --> 0:47:48.120
<v Speaker 1>what you were dreaming about. And presumably this will only

0:47:48.160 --> 0:47:51.880
<v Speaker 1>become higher resolution with time. So it maybe that in

0:47:51.920 --> 0:47:56.120
<v Speaker 1>the future we are able to know what you dreamed

0:47:56.239 --> 0:47:58.799
<v Speaker 1>even if you can't remember it. You could keep a

0:47:59.080 --> 0:48:03.560
<v Speaker 1>digitized dream diary that way, or you could share your

0:48:03.640 --> 0:48:08.080
<v Speaker 1>dreams with a girlfriend or boyfriend, or less likely, a

0:48:08.239 --> 0:48:11.520
<v Speaker 1>dream could be used in a court of lossome day.

0:48:12.000 --> 0:48:13.839
<v Speaker 1>Who knows where this will all go, but we can

0:48:13.920 --> 0:48:17.600
<v Speaker 1>imagine that in two hundred years from now, dreams may

0:48:17.640 --> 0:48:21.600
<v Speaker 1>be a very different sort of thing than the entirely

0:48:21.800 --> 0:48:25.920
<v Speaker 1>private experience that we enjoy now. So let's wrap up.

0:48:26.239 --> 0:48:28.719
<v Speaker 1>To my mind, the biggest issue that freaks me out

0:48:28.760 --> 0:48:34.200
<v Speaker 1>about dreams is this issue that we believe patently impossible situations,

0:48:34.239 --> 0:48:38.680
<v Speaker 1>and we accept false memories even when they contradict events

0:48:38.719 --> 0:48:42.040
<v Speaker 1>that we know to be true in waking life. This

0:48:42.120 --> 0:48:44.880
<v Speaker 1>represents a deeper question about why we can be so

0:48:45.239 --> 0:48:50.320
<v Speaker 1>easily fooled, but many other questions about dreams can be answered.

0:48:50.400 --> 0:48:53.600
<v Speaker 1>In the meantime, we're in a moment of using the

0:48:53.640 --> 0:48:57.360
<v Speaker 1>tools of neuroscience to tie specific details of the biology

0:48:57.640 --> 0:48:59.960
<v Speaker 1>to the experience of dreaming. We still have a lot

0:49:00.080 --> 0:49:03.439
<v Speaker 1>long way to go, but some promising leads can come

0:49:03.480 --> 0:49:08.040
<v Speaker 1>from the way that dream content changes with drugs. For example,

0:49:08.400 --> 0:49:11.800
<v Speaker 1>dreams can be made more vivid and frightening by drugs

0:49:11.800 --> 0:49:16.759
<v Speaker 1>that affect the dopamine system or by alkaloids. Antidepressants tend

0:49:16.800 --> 0:49:21.480
<v Speaker 1>to reduce the amount of dream sleep. Medications to reduce

0:49:21.520 --> 0:49:25.960
<v Speaker 1>epileptic seizures also seem to reduce nightmares. So we can

0:49:26.000 --> 0:49:29.840
<v Speaker 1>imagine in the near future having systematic studies to work

0:49:29.880 --> 0:49:33.759
<v Speaker 1>out the effects of different drugs on dream content, and

0:49:33.840 --> 0:49:36.799
<v Speaker 1>to do this in conjunction with brain imaging, and we

0:49:36.880 --> 0:49:40.840
<v Speaker 1>might be able to further nail down the relationships between

0:49:41.480 --> 0:49:46.480
<v Speaker 1>dream content and specific bits of the dream generation network.

0:49:47.040 --> 0:49:50.600
<v Speaker 1>And beyond drugs, we can also look to disease because

0:49:50.640 --> 0:49:55.120
<v Speaker 1>specific problems lead to the loss or impairment of dreaming.

0:49:55.560 --> 0:50:00.239
<v Speaker 1>People can lose dreaming with injuries to the inferior paride

0:50:00.320 --> 0:50:04.080
<v Speaker 1>lobe on either side. Patients with certain forms of dementia

0:50:04.560 --> 0:50:10.200
<v Speaker 1>report bland dreams, involving less aggression and less narrative complexity

0:50:10.239 --> 0:50:14.719
<v Speaker 1>and less emotional content. So by looking at changes to

0:50:14.760 --> 0:50:19.120
<v Speaker 1>the brain and corresponding changes in dreaming, we can better

0:50:19.280 --> 0:50:23.560
<v Speaker 1>map out the landscape of what is involved. And fundamentally,

0:50:23.800 --> 0:50:28.800
<v Speaker 1>studying dreaming may help us to comprehend consciousness. Why because

0:50:28.840 --> 0:50:32.719
<v Speaker 1>there are so many similarities between rem sleep and the

0:50:33.040 --> 0:50:36.640
<v Speaker 1>awake conscious state. Now there are major differences as well,

0:50:37.080 --> 0:50:39.800
<v Speaker 1>but it's important to note that we find both waking

0:50:39.840 --> 0:50:44.080
<v Speaker 1>life and dreaming equally compelling and believable, which tells us

0:50:44.080 --> 0:50:46.319
<v Speaker 1>that all you need to do is strike the right

0:50:46.480 --> 0:50:50.280
<v Speaker 1>notes on the neural piano and you have your totally

0:50:50.400 --> 0:50:54.719
<v Speaker 1>believable experience. But what would be cool is if there

0:50:54.719 --> 0:50:58.799
<v Speaker 1>were something like consciousness during a dream state that was

0:50:58.840 --> 0:51:04.760
<v Speaker 1>even close to our daily, normal conscious experience. And that's

0:51:05.040 --> 0:51:07.239
<v Speaker 1>what we're going to talk about next week. We're going

0:51:07.320 --> 0:51:11.719
<v Speaker 1>to talk about the very rare circumstance when you are

0:51:11.880 --> 0:51:15.600
<v Speaker 1>dreaming and you realize that you are dreaming, and you

0:51:15.719 --> 0:51:20.840
<v Speaker 1>take control of your dream and become an active director

0:51:21.000 --> 0:51:25.879
<v Speaker 1>of the plot. You are essentially conscious but living inside

0:51:25.960 --> 0:51:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the walls of your skull. So join me next week

0:51:29.560 --> 0:51:33.360
<v Speaker 1>as we sail into the very strange and amazing territory

0:51:33.840 --> 0:51:41.000
<v Speaker 1>of lucid dreaming. Go to eagleman dot com slash podcast

0:51:41.040 --> 0:51:44.879
<v Speaker 1>for more information and find further reading. Send me an

0:51:44.960 --> 0:51:48.920
<v Speaker 1>email at podcast at eagleman dot com with questions or discussion,

0:51:49.400 --> 0:51:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and check out and subscribe to Inner Cosmos on YouTube

0:51:52.880 --> 0:51:56.400
<v Speaker 1>for videos of each episode and to leave comments. Until

0:51:56.440 --> 0:51:59.680
<v Speaker 1>next time, I'm David Eagleman, and this is in our

0:51:59.800 --> 0:52:00.479
<v Speaker 1>car is miss