WEBVTT - Asian Development Bank Lowers Growth Forecast on Tariff Concerns

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:07.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News.

0:00:11.000 --> 0:00:14.560
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to the Bloomberg Daybreak Asia podcast. I'm Doug Krisner.

0:00:14.880 --> 0:00:17.439
<v Speaker 2>We had a mixed finish for US equities given some

0:00:17.560 --> 0:00:20.959
<v Speaker 2>angst ahead of earnings this week from four mag seven members,

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:23.799
<v Speaker 2>and sentiment was dampened a bit as well by news

0:00:23.840 --> 0:00:27.280
<v Speaker 2>over the weekend. The China's Huawei Technologies is set to

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:30.800
<v Speaker 2>test a new chip. Here is Bloomberg's Valerie Titel.

0:00:31.120 --> 0:00:34.320
<v Speaker 3>Huawei is reportedly preparing to test a new AI chip

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:37.239
<v Speaker 3>that it hopes can replace some of those products replaced

0:00:37.240 --> 0:00:40.199
<v Speaker 3>by Navidia. This comes from the Wall Street Journal reporting

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 3>that Huawei has approached some Chinese tech companies about testing

0:00:44.479 --> 0:00:47.160
<v Speaker 3>the new chip. The new processor would put China's capabilities

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:50.080
<v Speaker 3>around two generations behind Navidia's new Blackwell chip.

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:53.280
<v Speaker 2>That is Bloomberg's Valerie Titel. Their shares an Nvidia. We're

0:00:53.280 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 2>down today by more than two percent. Now we're also

0:00:56.320 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 2>expecting a flurry of economic data this week and in

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 2>a moment speaking with Clayton Trick, he is head of

0:01:02.160 --> 0:01:06.480
<v Speaker 2>portfolio management at angel O Capital Advisors. But we begin

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:10.320
<v Speaker 2>this morning in the Asia Pacific. The Asian Development Bank

0:01:10.360 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 2>has lowered its growth forecast for the continent, the institution

0:01:14.080 --> 0:01:17.000
<v Speaker 2>saying that US tariffs will shave growth in the region

0:01:17.080 --> 0:01:19.800
<v Speaker 2>by a third of a percentage point, falling to four

0:01:19.840 --> 0:01:23.320
<v Speaker 2>point nine percent in twenty twenty five, and then dropping

0:01:23.400 --> 0:01:26.840
<v Speaker 2>by a full percentage point in twenty twenty six to

0:01:26.959 --> 0:01:30.760
<v Speaker 2>four point seven percent. Now, the ADB released its annual

0:01:30.800 --> 0:01:35.319
<v Speaker 2>outlook on Wednesday, numbers for which were calculated before the

0:01:35.360 --> 0:01:39.040
<v Speaker 2>April second tariff announcement was made by President Trump, and

0:01:39.120 --> 0:01:43.080
<v Speaker 2>the ADB's chief economist has already said those numbers will

0:01:43.120 --> 0:01:46.360
<v Speaker 2>be revised lower in its July report. For more, we

0:01:46.440 --> 0:01:50.440
<v Speaker 2>heard from the President of the Asian Development Bank, Masato Conda.

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 2>He spoke exclusively with Bloomberg sherry On in Tokyo.

0:01:54.240 --> 0:01:57.120
<v Speaker 1>You're really coming directly from Washington, DC. Tell us a

0:01:57.120 --> 0:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>little bit about those conversations about the trade negotiations and

0:02:00.400 --> 0:02:03.160
<v Speaker 1>how that's really weighing on developing Asia.

0:02:03.400 --> 0:02:06.480
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, of course, we have talked about the you know,

0:02:06.680 --> 0:02:13.000
<v Speaker 4>the challenges, particularly from the conflict, geopolitical attentions, but also

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:17.720
<v Speaker 4>we discussed much more about the opportunities because you know,

0:02:18.240 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 4>of course this is a lot of difficult times, but

0:02:21.280 --> 0:02:25.960
<v Speaker 4>we've got to translated these challenges into the opportunities to improve.

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:30.320
<v Speaker 4>So we have talked very much about the for instance,

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:35.920
<v Speaker 4>the private sector development and private capital mobilizations, and it

0:02:36.040 --> 0:02:40.800
<v Speaker 4>illiginated with the ministers, including the US A tragedy, security,

0:02:41.320 --> 0:02:45.840
<v Speaker 4>a scot Present and all of the mdb has including

0:02:45.960 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 4>the world of bank prisons A Jabanga and particularly I

0:02:51.600 --> 0:02:56.960
<v Speaker 4>put my ambition to increase private sector lending full forward

0:02:57.120 --> 0:03:01.480
<v Speaker 4>to thirteen billion annually lending to the private sector.

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:06.800
<v Speaker 1>How feasible are those plans when the global economy faces

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>a potential downturn, given of course, all the challenges around trade.

0:03:11.080 --> 0:03:13.720
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, of course this is strange in time, but this

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 4>is a great opportunity to make more resisions under this,

0:03:18.600 --> 0:03:24.239
<v Speaker 4>you know, building the enabling environment for private sector invests,

0:03:24.280 --> 0:03:28.120
<v Speaker 4>for instance, they through the very good deportics including the

0:03:28.160 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 4>deregations or or even the privatization, and the capital market

0:03:34.880 --> 0:03:40.440
<v Speaker 4>development and the regional corporation, the connectivity all over, then

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:41.440
<v Speaker 4>we can support.

0:03:41.680 --> 0:03:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Do you see the potential and risk of a downturn globally?

0:03:46.040 --> 0:03:49.680
<v Speaker 4>Of course we have pretty much vigilant because you know,

0:03:49.840 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 4>as you mentioned, the Asian economy is a lather exposed

0:03:54.280 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 4>to the global market. So through not only the trade

0:04:00.080 --> 0:04:05.640
<v Speaker 4>it but also the financial capital market. There by the

0:04:05.680 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 4>decrease the confidence or the you know, rather weak sentiment.

0:04:12.360 --> 0:04:17.000
<v Speaker 4>But I think the agent countries are stronger than in

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:20.720
<v Speaker 4>the past, but no room for comprecencis. So this is

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 4>the time for Asia to boost the domestic demand. And

0:04:26.000 --> 0:04:29.480
<v Speaker 4>there are parts of the sound economic policy and the

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:34.599
<v Speaker 4>you know or diversify the uh you know, industries and

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:36.160
<v Speaker 4>the trade partners as.

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:41.159
<v Speaker 1>Well, diversified partners and training within the region. Even more

0:04:41.240 --> 0:04:44.960
<v Speaker 1>so when you have when you're facing these incredible rates

0:04:44.960 --> 0:04:46.320
<v Speaker 1>of terists coming from Washington, d C.

0:04:46.680 --> 0:04:50.240
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I believe that this is the opportunity to you know,

0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:58.080
<v Speaker 4>even open more actually you know, the this is the

0:04:58.080 --> 0:05:02.960
<v Speaker 4>moment the need to find out the more partners the economies,

0:05:03.240 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 4>but not only from the US or others, but always

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:10.360
<v Speaker 4>I believe the diversification of the industries is good.

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:14.280
<v Speaker 1>Does not train include China because Washington wants to restrict

0:05:14.360 --> 0:05:16.000
<v Speaker 1>any conversations with Beijing.

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:20.320
<v Speaker 4>Not really, but of course the United States is a

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 4>very much important pattern of all us. The foundational, the

0:05:25.560 --> 0:05:29.120
<v Speaker 4>shareholders and the one of the largest that I really value,

0:05:29.440 --> 0:05:33.880
<v Speaker 4>the advices and the looking forward to the even crosser

0:05:33.920 --> 0:05:37.760
<v Speaker 4>partnership with the United States, but also the China is

0:05:37.760 --> 0:05:41.360
<v Speaker 4>a bit important to member countries, so we will try

0:05:41.440 --> 0:05:45.599
<v Speaker 4>to find the solution benefiting benefiting or membership.

0:05:46.160 --> 0:05:48.200
<v Speaker 1>How much of an opportunity is the fact that we

0:05:48.279 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 1>could see stronger Asian currencies given the sell America sell

0:05:52.480 --> 0:05:53.560
<v Speaker 1>US dollar trade.

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:58.279
<v Speaker 4>It's quite a difficult to terror because you know, particularly

0:05:58.480 --> 0:06:04.040
<v Speaker 4>the trade street is full of uncertainty and changing ud

0:06:04.200 --> 0:06:07.920
<v Speaker 4>by day. So what we can't do is to protect

0:06:08.360 --> 0:06:13.240
<v Speaker 4>the regional economies against external shocks and the builder resisiens

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:16.160
<v Speaker 4>uh in the future shocks.

0:06:16.880 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 1>The fact that, for example here in Japan, the yen

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:23.039
<v Speaker 1>wasn't incorporated in the trade negotiations. How important is it

0:06:23.240 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 1>for all of these trading partners to separate those negotiations

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:31.400
<v Speaker 1>pretending to trade, pretending to financial markets like currencies.

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:33.960
<v Speaker 4>Or are inter related to the butter trade and the

0:06:34.000 --> 0:06:37.360
<v Speaker 4>currency are quite a different animal, and probably there uh

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:40.960
<v Speaker 4>you know, needs to be negotiated from the uh you know,

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:45.960
<v Speaker 4>professional point of views in the respectively, but also for

0:06:46.080 --> 0:06:49.599
<v Speaker 4>the polity side. Always for instance, that we needed to

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 4>pass the sound of Marcro economic apology, which is a

0:06:52.440 --> 0:06:58.520
<v Speaker 4>business protection about the currencies various so and also the

0:06:58.680 --> 0:07:02.000
<v Speaker 4>deepening the capital market. The financial market would be a

0:07:02.160 --> 0:07:05.840
<v Speaker 4>very good in any case. So you know, the what

0:07:05.960 --> 0:07:09.000
<v Speaker 4>we can do and we should do is quite the same.

0:07:09.680 --> 0:07:13.239
<v Speaker 1>Japan is one of the first to negotiate with Washington.

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:16.200
<v Speaker 1>Could this serve as a model in trade negotiations for

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:17.080
<v Speaker 1>developing Asia?

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:20.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, not really, I don't think so. But anyway, ADB

0:07:20.720 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 4>will help all member countries to build their religions against

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:30.400
<v Speaker 4>these things and the otherwise, and if the shops comes,

0:07:31.160 --> 0:07:34.400
<v Speaker 4>we have a variety of instruments and support, including the

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:39.640
<v Speaker 4>counta secret COLO assistance and also the UH the data

0:07:39.680 --> 0:07:42.960
<v Speaker 4>management or captain market development. Many things we can do.

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:47.239
<v Speaker 1>Why don't you think that this trade negotiation model could apply,

0:07:47.400 --> 0:07:49.960
<v Speaker 1>for example for the lights of Thailand Vietnam. We know

0:07:50.040 --> 0:07:53.280
<v Speaker 1>that they also face really stiff tires coming from Washington.

0:07:54.800 --> 0:07:58.000
<v Speaker 4>But as I said, what they can do and we

0:07:58.040 --> 0:08:02.800
<v Speaker 4>can just is to for instance, the divastications of the

0:08:03.000 --> 0:08:08.560
<v Speaker 4>trade partners. Who increases the regigions, so not only inside

0:08:08.680 --> 0:08:12.680
<v Speaker 4>the for instance, the we are supporting their more connectivity

0:08:12.720 --> 0:08:17.800
<v Speaker 4>amongst the same countries or sub regional initiatives, but also

0:08:19.160 --> 0:08:23.640
<v Speaker 4>trying to find the more partners beyond the region and

0:08:23.800 --> 0:08:28.720
<v Speaker 4>Also the deepening the trade agreement inside the region could

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:32.880
<v Speaker 4>be possible, including the uh you know, you know father

0:08:32.960 --> 0:08:35.559
<v Speaker 4>developing towards the services and sects like.

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 1>Prime Minister issue, for example, was in Thailand in Vietnam.

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 1>What sort of cooperation do we need to see more

0:08:41.480 --> 0:08:43.960
<v Speaker 1>between developing and developed countries?

0:08:45.480 --> 0:08:49.200
<v Speaker 4>You know, this is quite simple, deeper under the you know,

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:52.760
<v Speaker 4>more opener so the you know, in terms of the

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 4>uh you know products, you know, it could be broadened

0:08:57.840 --> 0:09:02.200
<v Speaker 4>including the services sectors and also the uh you know,

0:09:02.360 --> 0:09:04.920
<v Speaker 4>the liberal protection could be a lot of other So

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:07.360
<v Speaker 4>there are many things we can do, but it depends

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:12.199
<v Speaker 4>on the specific institutions, particularly the you know, each country

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:18.199
<v Speaker 4>has their own domestic political stations, so we've got to

0:09:18.240 --> 0:09:24.080
<v Speaker 4>be very capful. But in principle probably the sticking to

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:27.880
<v Speaker 4>the open economy will be good for the.

0:09:27.960 --> 0:09:30.920
<v Speaker 1>Digital sat Kana really good to have you with us

0:09:30.960 --> 0:09:34.080
<v Speaker 1>here in the Tokyo studio. He's president of the Asian

0:09:34.200 --> 0:09:35.160
<v Speaker 1>Development Bank.

0:09:42.600 --> 0:09:45.920
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to the Daybreak Asia podcast. I'm Derek Krisner.

0:09:46.280 --> 0:09:48.839
<v Speaker 2>So in the States, it will be a busy week

0:09:48.920 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 2>for both corporate earnings and economic data, and I think

0:09:51.840 --> 0:09:53.960
<v Speaker 2>it's fair to say that the key question here is

0:09:54.000 --> 0:09:57.559
<v Speaker 2>whether these numbers will begin to illustrate the impacts of

0:09:57.600 --> 0:10:00.480
<v Speaker 2>the trade war. We're joined now by clay and Trick.

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:04.600
<v Speaker 2>He is head of portfolio management at angel O Capital Advisors.

0:10:04.880 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 2>Clayton joining us from Atlanta, Georgia. Good of you to

0:10:08.280 --> 0:10:10.600
<v Speaker 2>make time to chat with us. Give me your sense

0:10:10.640 --> 0:10:14.200
<v Speaker 2>of where you think the overall economy is right now

0:10:14.320 --> 0:10:17.600
<v Speaker 2>up against the tariffs that the Trump administration has put

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:18.319
<v Speaker 2>into effect.

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:22.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, definitely been an interesting start to the year. We

0:10:22.480 --> 0:10:26.000
<v Speaker 5>really had anticipated this year could have a lot of turbulence.

0:10:26.600 --> 0:10:29.720
<v Speaker 5>Investors went into twenty twenty five, you know, very very

0:10:29.760 --> 0:10:34.280
<v Speaker 5>bolish on potential deregulation and tax cut bill at some

0:10:34.320 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 5>point in twenty twenty five. But we definitely got a

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 5>lot of turbulence. In the short term. The US economy,

0:10:39.960 --> 0:10:43.480
<v Speaker 5>or at least capital markets in the last week really stabilized,

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:46.400
<v Speaker 5>but we are at different levels. You know, the SMP

0:10:46.559 --> 0:10:49.360
<v Speaker 5>is down about ten percent from the peak in the

0:10:49.400 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 5>first quarter. Corporate credit spreads are a little bit wider,

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:58.400
<v Speaker 5>but we are sinsing a stabilization here in the markets.

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 5>It's really trying to see if some of the soft data,

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:05.960
<v Speaker 5>which has been getting a lot weaker in the last

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 5>thirty days, you know, translates to weakness in hard data,

0:11:09.559 --> 0:11:12.000
<v Speaker 5>and so you know, the jobs numbers coming out Friday,

0:11:12.040 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 5>We're getting is report very soon, and so there's a

0:11:16.520 --> 0:11:20.199
<v Speaker 5>lot that we're going to have to digest as market participants.

0:11:20.480 --> 0:11:23.679
<v Speaker 2>We had an interesting piece on the Bloomberg today indicating

0:11:23.720 --> 0:11:28.560
<v Speaker 2>that the US is still receiving containerships that departed China

0:11:28.679 --> 0:11:31.280
<v Speaker 2>pre teariff, and if you accept the idea that it

0:11:31.320 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 2>takes maybe thirty days perhaps a little more for those

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:37.600
<v Speaker 2>vessels to travel from China to the nearest US port,

0:11:37.880 --> 0:11:41.080
<v Speaker 2>we really haven't felt the full impact quite yet, have we.

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:45.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I don't think we have. I think that especially

0:11:45.440 --> 0:11:48.720
<v Speaker 5>in DC, things these are moving very quickly. It does

0:11:48.760 --> 0:11:52.400
<v Speaker 5>seem that deals are potentially going to get done very fast.

0:11:52.440 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 5>So you know, things could evolve in the coming days

0:11:56.800 --> 0:12:01.840
<v Speaker 5>and weeks on what deals get done between mean global leaders.

0:12:02.320 --> 0:12:04.120
<v Speaker 5>But I agree, you know, we haven't seen that full

0:12:04.160 --> 0:12:06.720
<v Speaker 5>impact yet. You know, the hard data has continued to

0:12:06.720 --> 0:12:10.440
<v Speaker 5>be very strong. First quarter data looks to continue to

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:13.880
<v Speaker 5>be strong. We haven't really seen much of a slowing

0:12:14.280 --> 0:12:16.559
<v Speaker 5>in the labor market. We really haven't seen a big,

0:12:16.640 --> 0:12:19.840
<v Speaker 5>large increase in jobless claims, right in companies laying off.

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:23.200
<v Speaker 5>So overall, the hard data still looks pretty strong. It's

0:12:23.240 --> 0:12:27.000
<v Speaker 5>really around trying to dissect when when the data potentially

0:12:27.040 --> 0:12:30.480
<v Speaker 5>does change later this year. And for us, you know,

0:12:30.679 --> 0:12:33.880
<v Speaker 5>the big question is there are a lot of cross

0:12:33.920 --> 0:12:38.480
<v Speaker 5>currents right now happening in DC. Some are expansionary policy,

0:12:38.800 --> 0:12:43.560
<v Speaker 5>some are contractionary policy. It's really around what is going

0:12:43.600 --> 0:12:46.040
<v Speaker 5>to outweigh each other. And we think that you know,

0:12:46.160 --> 0:12:49.720
<v Speaker 5>returns for market investors are really going to have much

0:12:49.800 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 5>larger tails, both in the upside and downside risks. So

0:12:53.720 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 5>a lot of things can really be evolving here.

0:12:56.480 --> 0:12:59.840
<v Speaker 2>So we had a measure of manufacturing activity today for

0:13:00.120 --> 0:13:04.240
<v Speaker 2>Texas published by the Dallas FED, and it weakened significantly.

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 2>A lot of the businesses that were surveyed used towards

0:13:07.800 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 2>like chaos and insanity to describe the turmoil as a

0:13:11.480 --> 0:13:14.600
<v Speaker 2>result of these tariffs. And I'm wondering whether or not

0:13:15.160 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 2>if things follow this same path, whether the level of

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 2>pain expressed in market action is going to put some

0:13:23.360 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 2>pressure on the administration to get deals done sooner rather

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:30.160
<v Speaker 2>than later, or whether you think there's a risk that

0:13:30.280 --> 0:13:33.400
<v Speaker 2>the administration may stick to its guns and try to

0:13:33.480 --> 0:13:37.200
<v Speaker 2>get more of what it's after, irrespective of what markets

0:13:37.520 --> 0:13:38.040
<v Speaker 2>are saying.

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:42.160
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, no, we think that trying to happen. It seems

0:13:42.200 --> 0:13:46.120
<v Speaker 5>the administration was definitely holding its ground early in April

0:13:46.120 --> 0:13:49.320
<v Speaker 5>when there was the initial saw off in the equity markets.

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:53.960
<v Speaker 5>It really was the sharp move higher in the treasury

0:13:54.040 --> 0:13:57.040
<v Speaker 5>yield that really happened over one week from four percent

0:13:57.360 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 5>to north of four and a half percent. They're really

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 5>seemed to create you know, indigestion if you will, in

0:14:04.200 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 5>d C. And so it does seem like the overall

0:14:08.400 --> 0:14:12.280
<v Speaker 5>tone is shifting, and the data has been slowing. To

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 5>your point that Dallas FED was a pretty shocking lower number.

0:14:16.559 --> 0:14:19.760
<v Speaker 5>There's a lot of soft data through surveys don't look

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:22.520
<v Speaker 5>quite good in the Beige Book talks about, you know,

0:14:22.600 --> 0:14:26.040
<v Speaker 5>a slowing of hiring. So all those things are starting

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:30.040
<v Speaker 5>to crab collaborate and create an environment where we do

0:14:30.120 --> 0:14:32.640
<v Speaker 5>think the tone is changing in DC. And so that's

0:14:32.680 --> 0:14:35.200
<v Speaker 5>why we think markets in the short term redly stabilized.

0:14:35.440 --> 0:14:39.000
<v Speaker 5>You know, we're not seeing a return of stock market,

0:14:39.280 --> 0:14:42.080
<v Speaker 5>you know, to previous highs. We do think it's stabilized

0:14:42.120 --> 0:14:44.480
<v Speaker 5>here as to tone and shifting and there's a lot

0:14:44.520 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 5>more discussion around a tax build that seems a little

0:14:47.520 --> 0:14:50.240
<v Speaker 5>more eminent. So it seems like things are happening in

0:14:50.280 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 5>the background, but you know, don't feel like markets are

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:53.800
<v Speaker 5>out of the woods yet.

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:56.320
<v Speaker 2>It's going to be a very interesting week when it

0:14:56.360 --> 0:14:59.120
<v Speaker 2>comes to the economic data. A couple of data points

0:14:59.160 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 2>on the growth side GDP and at the end of

0:15:02.040 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 2>the week the April employment report, and then we've got

0:15:05.760 --> 0:15:08.320
<v Speaker 2>numbers that are more aligned with the inflation story. And

0:15:08.360 --> 0:15:12.000
<v Speaker 2>I'm thinking here of the employment cost Index and the

0:15:12.080 --> 0:15:15.480
<v Speaker 2>report on first quarter PCEE. Where are you right now

0:15:15.520 --> 0:15:18.440
<v Speaker 2>in your view when you look at the balance between

0:15:18.560 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 2>inflation on one hand and growth on the other.

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, we're in the camp that you know, typically when

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 5>you get an inflation shock to tear ups, it is

0:15:27.920 --> 0:15:31.000
<v Speaker 5>a little more transitory. We think the bond market right

0:15:31.000 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 5>now is really pricing a FED that has changed their

0:15:34.200 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 5>tune from an inflation reducing regime to a more of

0:15:37.040 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 5>a growth supporter regime. This is the kind of the

0:15:40.160 --> 0:15:43.280
<v Speaker 5>biggest wildcard, and that's where the markets are pricing in

0:15:43.520 --> 0:15:45.800
<v Speaker 5>the FED funds rate to get you know, sub three

0:15:45.840 --> 0:15:48.640
<v Speaker 5>percent in the coming quarters. So that's a that's a

0:15:48.680 --> 0:15:52.880
<v Speaker 5>pretty big change in FED policy in environment where inflation

0:15:53.400 --> 0:15:57.320
<v Speaker 5>you can could rise. Here, that's a huge wildcard that

0:15:57.400 --> 0:16:00.760
<v Speaker 5>the market's pricing in. If we don't get the cuts

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:03.920
<v Speaker 5>that are expected, it could be quite different our perspective,

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:06.320
<v Speaker 5>but we think is going to happen. We definitely think

0:16:06.320 --> 0:16:09.840
<v Speaker 5>you could see a slight move higher in inflation. But

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:12.800
<v Speaker 5>we're in the camp that growth was expected to continue

0:16:12.840 --> 0:16:16.720
<v Speaker 5>to slow into twenty twenty five. So we've been looking

0:16:16.760 --> 0:16:21.040
<v Speaker 5>for slower growth in the United States. The US consumer,

0:16:21.600 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 5>which is the largest portion of GDP consumer spending, and

0:16:26.440 --> 0:16:29.760
<v Speaker 5>the consumer was extremely strong conteenue to have really strong

0:16:29.800 --> 0:16:32.280
<v Speaker 5>consumer spending through the fourth quarter. If you didn't have

0:16:32.680 --> 0:16:34.680
<v Speaker 5>that strong of a consumer, you would have not had

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:37.240
<v Speaker 5>a positive GDP print. And so if you get a

0:16:37.280 --> 0:16:40.120
<v Speaker 5>pause in a slowing a consumer spending throughout the middle

0:16:40.120 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 5>of this year, we think that the FED is going

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 5>to be more focused on the growth side of the equation,

0:16:44.560 --> 0:16:47.280
<v Speaker 5>which we thought was already going to take place before

0:16:47.320 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 5>this new kind of self inflicted on certain neighbor getting

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:50.360
<v Speaker 5>in DC.

0:16:50.720 --> 0:16:52.920
<v Speaker 2>So if growth is going to slow and you're confident

0:16:53.040 --> 0:16:56.840
<v Speaker 2>that any inflationary impact from the tariffs will be temporary,

0:16:57.120 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 2>does that mean there are compelling opportunities right now in

0:17:00.200 --> 0:17:02.000
<v Speaker 2>the bond market, let's say at the long end.

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:06.000
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, we would definitely agree the bond market looks quite attractive.

0:17:06.400 --> 0:17:08.439
<v Speaker 5>You know, the figures we were talking about as a

0:17:08.440 --> 0:17:12.320
<v Speaker 5>team today was that the fixed income market looks very solid,

0:17:12.920 --> 0:17:15.280
<v Speaker 5>especially amidst a lot of the amount of volatility we

0:17:15.320 --> 0:17:19.240
<v Speaker 5>are facing and headwinds potentially facing here in twenty twenty five,

0:17:19.600 --> 0:17:22.880
<v Speaker 5>and so we think there's great opportunities and really investment

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:27.200
<v Speaker 5>grade fixed income areas like agency mortgages, even just treasuries,

0:17:27.200 --> 0:17:30.280
<v Speaker 5>you're wrapped around kind of a four percent treasury yield

0:17:30.320 --> 0:17:33.400
<v Speaker 5>that's north of inflation, so positive real rate level. So

0:17:34.000 --> 0:17:37.440
<v Speaker 5>that at this juncture, given the really uncertainty you have

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:40.919
<v Speaker 5>on growth and the valuations, you see inequities. You know,

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:44.639
<v Speaker 5>we've been recommending investors look to be overweight US fixed income,

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 5>but really focused on higher quality given the tails seem

0:17:49.400 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 5>like you could have a lot more, it could be

0:17:50.800 --> 0:17:53.960
<v Speaker 5>a lot fatter. Later in twenty twenty five, you were

0:17:53.960 --> 0:17:56.800
<v Speaker 5>a little more cautious on lower quality areas of US

0:17:56.840 --> 0:17:59.679
<v Speaker 5>fixed income. So we're more focused on the front end

0:17:59.680 --> 0:18:01.600
<v Speaker 5>of the year curve relative to the long end but

0:18:01.880 --> 0:18:04.160
<v Speaker 5>US high quality looks really attractive right now.

0:18:04.160 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 2>In terms of corporate versus munis versus sovereign. How are

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:09.520
<v Speaker 2>you balanced right now?

0:18:09.920 --> 0:18:13.760
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so we're more weighted to two areas, one being

0:18:13.760 --> 0:18:19.240
<v Speaker 5>the US homeowner and then also US corporate high investment

0:18:19.280 --> 0:18:22.399
<v Speaker 5>great corporate credit. So while corporate credit is going to

0:18:22.400 --> 0:18:26.720
<v Speaker 5>be more correlated with equity returns, we think that below

0:18:26.760 --> 0:18:29.600
<v Speaker 5>investment grade corporate credit will be more correlated. We think

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 5>high quality should actually perform quite well. The best real

0:18:32.760 --> 0:18:36.400
<v Speaker 5>opportunity to rere tilted toward is the US homeowner. Agency

0:18:36.440 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 5>mortgages being the primary example, one of the largest bond

0:18:39.000 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 5>markets in the world. That is an area that is

0:18:41.280 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 5>really benefiting from this higher rate volatility. Ie, you get

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 5>a much higher income historically today than you do relative

0:18:49.280 --> 0:18:53.159
<v Speaker 5>to treasury yields. Also, investors tend to overlook areas like

0:18:53.280 --> 0:18:57.639
<v Speaker 5>non agency mortgages and asset back bonds. Those markets certainly

0:18:57.720 --> 0:19:00.840
<v Speaker 5>never fully retraced from the seller off in twenty twenty

0:19:00.920 --> 0:19:06.720
<v Speaker 5>two that we saw equities and corporate credit retrays, not

0:19:06.800 --> 0:19:08.800
<v Speaker 5>agency mortgages and asset bag bonds, and they never go

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:10.480
<v Speaker 5>back to the levels that we had in twenty one,

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:13.640
<v Speaker 5>And so we see that as really the best opportunity

0:19:14.040 --> 0:19:16.520
<v Speaker 5>for later in this year. We've been overweight those areas

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 5>of the market, you know, really throughout twenty and twenty

0:19:19.080 --> 0:19:21.159
<v Speaker 5>five to start, and we plan to continue to do

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:22.159
<v Speaker 5>that in the second world.

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:24.160
<v Speaker 2>All Right, we'll leave it there, Clayton, Thank you so much.

0:19:24.200 --> 0:19:27.679
<v Speaker 2>Clayton Trick, he is head of portfolio management at angel

0:19:27.760 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 2>Oak Capital Advisors. Joining us from Atlanta, Georgia here on

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:37.200
<v Speaker 2>the Daybreak Asia Podcast. Thanks for listening to today's episode

0:19:37.280 --> 0:19:41.280
<v Speaker 2>of the Bloomberg Daybreak Asia Edition podcast. Each weekday, we

0:19:41.320 --> 0:19:45.200
<v Speaker 2>look at the story shaping markets, finance, and geopolitics in

0:19:45.240 --> 0:19:48.399
<v Speaker 2>the Asia Pacific. You can find us on Apple, Spotify,

0:19:48.560 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg Podcast YouTube channel, or anywhere else you listen.

0:19:52.480 --> 0:19:55.359
<v Speaker 2>Join us again tomorrow for insight on the market moves

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:59.920
<v Speaker 2>from Hong Kong to Singapore and Australia. I'm Doug Krisner

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:01.480
<v Speaker 2>and this is Bloomberg

0:20:08.640 --> 0:20:09.000
<v Speaker 1>MHM.