1
00:00:02,520 --> 00:00:16,640
Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio news.

2
00:00:12,840 --> 00:00:15,680
Speaker 2: Single Best Idea and a special edition. We'll get to

3
00:00:15,720 --> 00:00:18,799
Speaker 2: my essay of the Year in a moment. What a

4
00:00:18,920 --> 00:00:22,279
Speaker 2: joy A whole wide set of guests today, thanks to

5
00:00:22,440 --> 00:00:26,840
Speaker 2: Keith Cowing of NASA Watch for giving us great perspective

6
00:00:26,920 --> 00:00:30,920
Speaker 2: on Elon Musk in his space effort and what mister

7
00:00:30,960 --> 00:00:34,080
Speaker 2: Bezos is doing with Blue Origin. Everybody got safe back

8
00:00:34,120 --> 00:00:36,760
Speaker 2: to Earth after going up sixty two. As they call

9
00:00:36,800 --> 00:00:39,559
Speaker 2: it Shepherd, but it's sort of like Alan Shephard and

10
00:00:39,600 --> 00:00:42,720
Speaker 2: Mercury One where we're here, we're going up and we're

11
00:00:42,760 --> 00:00:45,000
Speaker 2: coming right back down. I think it's sort of cool

12
00:00:45,320 --> 00:00:49,040
Speaker 2: that they call it the Shepherd Mission. Our mission today

13
00:00:49,159 --> 00:00:52,360
Speaker 2: was good conversation Man Deep singh on Ai. Will have

14
00:00:52,440 --> 00:00:55,960
Speaker 2: him more and more tomorrow to look ahead at gold

15
00:00:56,000 --> 00:00:59,000
Speaker 2: at four thousand, maybe forty one hundred by the time

16
00:00:59,120 --> 00:01:03,760
Speaker 2: James Steele comes in the studio tomorrow from HSBC. Really

17
00:01:03,800 --> 00:01:07,559
Speaker 2: looking forward to that. Richard Clarina with a former vice

18
00:01:07,640 --> 00:01:11,680
Speaker 2: chairman of the Federal Reserve System with PIMCO and always

19
00:01:11,680 --> 00:01:16,160
Speaker 2: with Columbia. Richard Clarita and the turmoil, the Tumult of Japan.

20
00:01:16,600 --> 00:01:19,760
Speaker 3: Japan went through about a two decade period where they

21
00:01:19,760 --> 00:01:22,959
Speaker 3: had deflation. It wasn't a spiral, but prices were negative.

22
00:01:23,000 --> 00:01:24,920
Speaker 3: I think to me, Tom, one of the interesting things

23
00:01:24,959 --> 00:01:28,840
Speaker 3: about Japan is although the boj was trying to reflate

24
00:01:28,880 --> 00:01:32,280
Speaker 3: the economy, the politicians in the public actually didn't get

25
00:01:32,280 --> 00:01:36,000
Speaker 3: a vote. They actually liked deflation. You know, you've got

26
00:01:36,040 --> 00:01:38,679
Speaker 3: your savings in yen under the mattress. You know deflation

27
00:01:39,200 --> 00:01:40,760
Speaker 3: is good for you. So I think a challenge right

28
00:01:40,800 --> 00:01:43,680
Speaker 3: now in Japan is they finally, after twenty five years,

29
00:01:43,760 --> 00:01:47,200
Speaker 3: achieved the positive two or three percent inflation, but it's

30
00:01:47,240 --> 00:01:49,320
Speaker 3: creating substantial political tension.

31
00:01:49,440 --> 00:01:51,960
Speaker 2: Richard Clarina of PIMCO there and of course all of

32
00:01:52,000 --> 00:01:55,560
Speaker 2: us work at Columbia University, Bloomberg News off our Tokyo

33
00:01:55,720 --> 00:01:59,760
Speaker 2: desk today with a spectacular bar chart showing the agony

34
00:01:59,760 --> 00:02:03,320
Speaker 2: of an inflation to the Japanese. Their real wage, their

35
00:02:03,320 --> 00:02:07,960
Speaker 2: inflation adjusted wage is there's only one word for it.

36
00:02:07,960 --> 00:02:11,480
Speaker 2: It's grim. A special day my essay of the year,

37
00:02:11,680 --> 00:02:15,839
Speaker 2: and it is Professor Susie Welch of New York University.

38
00:02:15,919 --> 00:02:20,399
Speaker 2: Susie Welch, with some legitimate data study of this generational

39
00:02:20,480 --> 00:02:26,520
Speaker 2: divide between the goals aspirations of a older generation from

40
00:02:26,639 --> 00:02:29,080
Speaker 2: gen Z. It was an essay in the Wall Street Journal.

41
00:02:29,360 --> 00:02:33,240
Speaker 2: It's created a firestorm of comment. She was just brilliant.

42
00:02:33,280 --> 00:02:35,519
Speaker 2: Today here is Professor Welch.

43
00:02:35,800 --> 00:02:37,480
Speaker 1: They can't do what they would need to do, which

44
00:02:37,520 --> 00:02:40,960
Speaker 1: is promise a long term employment. I mean people feel

45
00:02:40,960 --> 00:02:42,959
Speaker 1: loyal when they feel like, Okay, I'm investing my time

46
00:02:42,960 --> 00:02:44,600
Speaker 1: in a company and I'm going to be here in

47
00:02:44,600 --> 00:02:46,400
Speaker 1: two or three years and my boss is going to be.

48
00:02:46,440 --> 00:02:49,560
Speaker 2: Here disclosure Bloomberg LP every day. It's a privilege. I mean,

49
00:02:49,560 --> 00:02:51,840
Speaker 2: that's where we come from, right, the three of us.

50
00:02:52,200 --> 00:02:54,560
Speaker 1: Right, Well, you've got probably a sense that, look, this

51
00:02:54,600 --> 00:02:57,000
Speaker 1: company is healthy and it's thriving, and we're all going

52
00:02:57,080 --> 00:02:58,920
Speaker 1: to be here, and I'm willing to get myself to

53
00:02:58,960 --> 00:03:01,799
Speaker 1: this organization and to work the extra hours because we're

54
00:03:01,800 --> 00:03:04,200
Speaker 1: all going to be here together. But for most people

55
00:03:04,200 --> 00:03:07,200
Speaker 1: going into organizations, there's this constant sense of fragility and

56
00:03:07,240 --> 00:03:09,320
Speaker 1: we may not be here. I could be gone tomorrow.

57
00:03:09,480 --> 00:03:12,800
Speaker 1: Why would you invest in yourself in that? And so

58
00:03:13,360 --> 00:03:16,800
Speaker 1: that contract is pretty much over now. There are places,

59
00:03:16,840 --> 00:03:19,040
Speaker 1: I think JP Morgan Goldman Zachs you can go and

60
00:03:19,080 --> 00:03:21,160
Speaker 1: think I could try to build my whole career here.

61
00:03:21,400 --> 00:03:23,280
Speaker 1: But there's not a lot of companies I've done anymore.

62
00:03:23,480 --> 00:03:27,200
Speaker 2: Susie Welch a riveting conversation. We hope to get that

63
00:03:27,320 --> 00:03:30,040
Speaker 2: out in its entirety for you on a podcast. We'll

64
00:03:30,040 --> 00:03:32,600
Speaker 2: see if we can pull that off. Today, I will

65
00:03:32,639 --> 00:03:35,920
Speaker 2: get the essay out on Twitter and LinkedIn and again

66
00:03:36,200 --> 00:03:39,280
Speaker 2: she's created with all of this is real academics. This

67
00:03:39,360 --> 00:03:42,960
Speaker 2: is not opinion, folks. This is like looking at complex

68
00:03:43,120 --> 00:03:48,240
Speaker 2: adult academic data about the emotions of gen Z versus

69
00:03:48,280 --> 00:03:52,840
Speaker 2: the emotions of the people on the hiring front at corporations.

70
00:03:52,880 --> 00:03:56,160
Speaker 2: We're in a podcast or out at Apple, your Spotify

71
00:03:56,480 --> 00:03:59,880
Speaker 2: YouTube podcasts, A single best idea

72
00:04:02,080 --> 00:04:02,480
Speaker 1: S