WEBVTT - Musk's Big Twitter Backers and Buy Now, Pay Later

0:00:02.320 --> 0:00:05.680
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power collive

0:00:06.440 --> 0:00:10.959
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:11.039 --> 0:00:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay I'm Emily taking San Francisco and this is

0:00:27.400 --> 0:00:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Technology. Coming up in the next hour, new information

0:00:31.520 --> 0:00:35.320
<v Speaker 1>on Musk's big backards in his bid to take over Twitter.

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:38.200
<v Speaker 1>High on the list and who buy based investment firm

0:00:38.240 --> 0:00:40.479
<v Speaker 1>with a secretive founder. We will tell you what you

0:00:40.520 --> 0:00:43.720
<v Speaker 1>need to know. Whilst I'm joined by Clarinas CEO, Sebastian

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 1>Simiatkowski is he ain't worried about Apple moving into Kliners,

0:00:48.520 --> 0:00:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Clarinas buying out pay Later territory, and Arianna Huffington joins

0:00:53.400 --> 0:00:54.840
<v Speaker 1>me to talk about how she got some of the

0:00:54.840 --> 0:00:58.320
<v Speaker 1>biggest companies in the world to sign Thrives mental health

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:01.840
<v Speaker 1>pledge covering mill and of workers. We're gonna get to

0:01:01.880 --> 0:01:03.920
<v Speaker 1>all of that in a moment, but first, A secretive

0:01:04.200 --> 0:01:07.600
<v Speaker 1>five billion dollar fund is helping elon Musk's bid to

0:01:07.800 --> 0:01:12.120
<v Speaker 1>buy Twitter. By Capital has committed seven hundred million dollars

0:01:12.120 --> 0:01:16.240
<v Speaker 1>to finance Musk's billion dollar deal. The firm is based

0:01:16.400 --> 0:01:20.280
<v Speaker 1>in Dubai and was founded by Alexander Tamas, a German

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:24.400
<v Speaker 1>investor who previously worked with Russian billionaire Eurie Millner Bloombers.

0:01:24.440 --> 0:01:27.080
<v Speaker 1>Kurt Wagner joins us to discuss. So tell us more

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:31.720
<v Speaker 1>about the significance, Kurt, of this fund's involvement. Well, I

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:34.720
<v Speaker 1>think it just goes to show exactly how far reaching

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Elon has had to go in order to get funding

0:01:38.520 --> 0:01:41.119
<v Speaker 1>for this deal. It also kind of goes to show

0:01:41.959 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 1>how international I think this there is interest in Twitter

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:49.080
<v Speaker 1>right now and mostly in funding a project that Elon

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:53.120
<v Speaker 1>Musk cares about. Right Vy has a history of kind

0:01:53.120 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 1>of connecting itself with these big named tech backers like Elon.

0:01:58.840 --> 0:02:01.880
<v Speaker 1>I think they're also in the boring company which Zilon. Uh.

0:02:02.040 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 1>They've done some investments um in SpaceX before. So I

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:08.280
<v Speaker 1>just think there's you know, it kind of gives a

0:02:08.280 --> 0:02:10.360
<v Speaker 1>bit of an international flare to this whole thing, but

0:02:10.400 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 1>also just goes to show exactly how far Ellen is

0:02:13.200 --> 0:02:15.160
<v Speaker 1>having to go in order to to find funding for

0:02:15.160 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 1>this thing. And they are the third largest outside equity

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:21.560
<v Speaker 1>investor in the deal, so that's they're they're getting a

0:02:21.560 --> 0:02:24.079
<v Speaker 1>big chunk of this deal. Talk to us about where

0:02:24.080 --> 0:02:27.480
<v Speaker 1>the discussions between Musk and Twitter stand on bots. There's

0:02:27.520 --> 0:02:30.400
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of back and forth. Right, Yeah, So

0:02:30.440 --> 0:02:33.440
<v Speaker 1>the latest this week was that Elon came forward. He

0:02:33.960 --> 0:02:37.720
<v Speaker 1>formally filed a letter with the SEC saying again, you know, hey,

0:02:37.760 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I may walk away from this deal if I don't

0:02:39.919 --> 0:02:43.360
<v Speaker 1>start getting information to prove that the Botto number Twitter

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:46.120
<v Speaker 1>claims is the Botto number is legit. And now what

0:02:46.280 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 1>we heard from yesterday was that Twitter is going to

0:02:48.760 --> 0:02:50.920
<v Speaker 1>give him access to the A p I, which is

0:02:50.960 --> 0:02:54.799
<v Speaker 1>known colloquially as the fire hose of tweets. Right, so

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:57.799
<v Speaker 1>every public tweet on Twitter is now going to be

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:00.200
<v Speaker 1>accessible to Ellen and his team. They can do with

0:03:00.240 --> 0:03:02.440
<v Speaker 1>that what they wish. I'm not exactly sure if that's

0:03:02.440 --> 0:03:05.000
<v Speaker 1>going to answer the box question for him, but it

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:07.200
<v Speaker 1>does show that they're trying to figure out a middle

0:03:07.200 --> 0:03:09.120
<v Speaker 1>ground here where he can get the answers he needs

0:03:09.120 --> 0:03:11.880
<v Speaker 1>and they can move this thing forward. Meantime, we've also

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:15.320
<v Speaker 1>been coming another story. Meta had been working on a

0:03:15.440 --> 0:03:17.840
<v Speaker 1>watch that we imagine would have been a competitor to

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:24.120
<v Speaker 1>the Apple Watch. They've now stopped those plans. What happened here, Yeah,

0:03:24.200 --> 0:03:25.959
<v Speaker 1>so they're still working on a smart watch. I do

0:03:26.080 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 1>want to be clear about that. But the one that

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:29.360
<v Speaker 1>we have been talking about and that you may have

0:03:29.440 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 1>seen written up in the press is no longer going

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:34.400
<v Speaker 1>to be developed. And that one had two cameras. That

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:35.840
<v Speaker 1>was kind of what made it unique. It at a

0:03:35.880 --> 0:03:38.200
<v Speaker 1>front facing camera, but also a camera on the back,

0:03:38.240 --> 0:03:40.480
<v Speaker 1>and you could take the watch off of the strap

0:03:40.760 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 1>and kind of hold it up to take pictures. And

0:03:43.120 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 1>what happened was that back camera that was against your

0:03:45.640 --> 0:03:50.280
<v Speaker 1>wrist that was interfering with the company's ability to um

0:03:50.600 --> 0:03:53.720
<v Speaker 1>use the watch as a controller. Right, So one of

0:03:53.760 --> 0:03:56.000
<v Speaker 1>the things they want to do with wrist wearables is

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:58.200
<v Speaker 1>they want to be able to determine when you're moving

0:03:58.240 --> 0:04:00.680
<v Speaker 1>your hand or your fingers so that you can use

0:04:00.720 --> 0:04:04.440
<v Speaker 1>that as a controller for example augmented reality glasses. And

0:04:04.480 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 1>the camera was interfering there. So they're gonna get rid

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:09.240
<v Speaker 1>of this prototype and they're gonna do something else with

0:04:09.280 --> 0:04:11.400
<v Speaker 1>the watch. But again, as you pointed out, this was

0:04:11.480 --> 0:04:13.800
<v Speaker 1>kind of considered something that maybe they were doing to

0:04:13.920 --> 0:04:15.880
<v Speaker 1>compete with the Apple Watch. So the fact that they're

0:04:15.920 --> 0:04:20.799
<v Speaker 1>moving to something else UM obviously is notable. Alright, Bloomber,

0:04:20.920 --> 0:04:23.400
<v Speaker 1>Kurt Wagner, thank you for your reporting on this. Now

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 1>back to that Musk Twitter deal. Another backer of that deal,

0:04:26.400 --> 0:04:29.640
<v Speaker 1>of course, is Larry Ellison, the Oracle founder, is the

0:04:29.680 --> 0:04:33.120
<v Speaker 1>world's eleventh richest person, with a net worth of eighty

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:36.520
<v Speaker 1>eight point nine billion dollars. In two thousand twelve, he

0:04:36.560 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 1>bought of the Hawaiian island of lan I for three

0:04:40.360 --> 0:04:44.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred million dollars. That purchase came with two four seasons resorts,

0:04:44.760 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 1>a significant chunk of its homes, and practically all of

0:04:48.440 --> 0:04:54.159
<v Speaker 1>its commercial properties. Overnight, Ellison became almost everyone's boss, landlord,

0:04:54.720 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>or both. In today's Big Take Blue, Sophie Alexander took

0:04:59.000 --> 0:05:01.320
<v Speaker 1>a deep dive on the impact this has had on

0:05:01.360 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 1>the people of Lenin and Sophie, I'm from Hawaii. We

0:05:05.080 --> 0:05:07.279
<v Speaker 1>call it La Nutty there talked to us about the

0:05:07.320 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 1>history of this island. I'm very familiar with it. How

0:05:10.560 --> 0:05:13.640
<v Speaker 1>is it that one person was able to buy almost

0:05:13.680 --> 0:05:17.200
<v Speaker 1>the entire island. Yeah, it's unique because you think of

0:05:17.240 --> 0:05:19.600
<v Speaker 1>billionaires buying private islands and it's not that big of

0:05:19.640 --> 0:05:21.600
<v Speaker 1>a deal. But this one is different because it has

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:25.159
<v Speaker 1>three thousand people who live there. Uh So, Lena's history

0:05:25.279 --> 0:05:28.280
<v Speaker 1>goes back into the eighteen hundreds when one person came

0:05:28.320 --> 0:05:31.240
<v Speaker 1>over and started buying up chunks of the land. And

0:05:31.400 --> 0:05:35.160
<v Speaker 1>slowly accumulated pretty much the entire island, like of it,

0:05:35.440 --> 0:05:37.800
<v Speaker 1>and that passed from one family to another until in

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 1>James Dole bought it and he started turning it into

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:45.839
<v Speaker 1>the world's largest pineapple plantation, which it was for seven decades.

0:05:46.080 --> 0:05:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Then it passes to another billionaire, David Murdoch, whom as

0:05:48.680 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 1>chairman of Dole, and then in two thousand twelve Larry

0:05:51.320 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>Ellison bought it. And of course there are still thousands

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:59.000
<v Speaker 1>of regular people who live there. How exactly are they

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:03.480
<v Speaker 1>being impacted by Larry Allison now owning it? Yeah, this

0:06:03.560 --> 0:06:06.480
<v Speaker 1>is interesting because, like I said, the people who live

0:06:06.520 --> 0:06:09.039
<v Speaker 1>there and have lived there for generations are used to

0:06:09.200 --> 0:06:11.800
<v Speaker 1>being under the control of a single company or a

0:06:11.839 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 1>single person or family. But Larry Ellison is a whole

0:06:15.120 --> 0:06:17.520
<v Speaker 1>different animal. As one person put it, you know, he's

0:06:17.520 --> 0:06:20.320
<v Speaker 1>got ninety billion dollars. That's a lot of money. I mean,

0:06:20.360 --> 0:06:22.880
<v Speaker 1>it's nearly double what you have before the pandemic started.

0:06:23.120 --> 0:06:25.360
<v Speaker 1>The last billionaire, David Murdoch, he only had like two

0:06:25.400 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 1>billion dollars. They call him the poor billionaire. Um, so

0:06:28.920 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 1>Larry can really do whatever he wants. And it's it's

0:06:31.080 --> 0:06:34.760
<v Speaker 1>starting to show and what exactly is he doing? I

0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:36.920
<v Speaker 1>mean this tell us the stories in your article are

0:06:37.120 --> 0:06:41.200
<v Speaker 1>just absolutely fascinating, right, so true billionaire form. You know,

0:06:41.240 --> 0:06:43.240
<v Speaker 1>as soon as Larry gets there, he decides he doesn't

0:06:43.240 --> 0:06:45.799
<v Speaker 1>like the food, so he builds one nobu. Now there's

0:06:46.120 --> 0:06:49.320
<v Speaker 1>another sense a buy nobu. He renovates the two fours

0:06:49.320 --> 0:06:52.440
<v Speaker 1>and seasons resorts and so now they're fancier than ever

0:06:52.680 --> 0:06:55.240
<v Speaker 1>for you know, thousands of dollars tens of thousands of

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:57.800
<v Speaker 1>dollars a night, um. And he's also doing things for

0:06:57.800 --> 0:07:00.760
<v Speaker 1>the community. You know, he bought the tree store and

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:03.560
<v Speaker 1>he renovated it um. But that is the main concern

0:07:03.640 --> 0:07:06.520
<v Speaker 1>is that he's buying up a lot of the small businesses.

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:09.320
<v Speaker 1>He's buying up some more houses, and people are nervous.

0:07:09.880 --> 0:07:13.160
<v Speaker 1>So generally are people you know, you use the word nervous.

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:16.240
<v Speaker 1>They're they're not happy with this, I think, even though

0:07:16.280 --> 0:07:18.880
<v Speaker 1>they're getting a new grocery store for example. Sure, I

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:20.760
<v Speaker 1>mean it depends who you ask, but I think it's

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 1>more of an anxiety because the big problem is a

0:07:23.560 --> 0:07:27.240
<v Speaker 1>lack of communication. People don't know what ultimately Larry's plans are,

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>and so they just don't know what their future is

0:07:30.200 --> 0:07:32.320
<v Speaker 1>going to look like here, and so more and more

0:07:32.360 --> 0:07:34.280
<v Speaker 1>of them feel like there's not a place for them

0:07:34.320 --> 0:07:36.920
<v Speaker 1>on the island. There it's being catered to the uber,

0:07:37.040 --> 0:07:40.040
<v Speaker 1>uber wealthy, not for for locals. Well, and a lot

0:07:40.080 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 1>of these people, you know, their livelihoods, they service the resorts,

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>they work at these resorts. Is Larry Ellison's spending a

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:49.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of time there personally. Do we know anything about

0:07:49.200 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 1>his endgame? Yes, So he moved there during the pandemic

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:54.360
<v Speaker 1>and that's been key because you know, it's kind of

0:07:54.400 --> 0:07:56.880
<v Speaker 1>like out of place, out of mind. Now that he's there,

0:07:57.080 --> 0:07:59.679
<v Speaker 1>all of his plans are picking up. So he's building

0:07:59.680 --> 0:08:02.560
<v Speaker 1>a monk story school, He's building a five home complex

0:08:02.640 --> 0:08:05.400
<v Speaker 1>for himself. Um, you know, he's building a new housing

0:08:05.400 --> 0:08:08.080
<v Speaker 1>project to house all of his construction workers because housing

0:08:08.160 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>is a huge issue on the island. He's shut down

0:08:10.440 --> 0:08:13.280
<v Speaker 1>his third hotel for workforce housing for the entire year.

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:15.520
<v Speaker 1>And a lot of this is happening with very little

0:08:15.520 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 1>communication or no communication with community. M interesting. Well, it's

0:08:20.000 --> 0:08:22.040
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating read. You can check it out this week's

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Big Take. Socie Alexander, thank you. Check out the

0:08:26.360 --> 0:08:31.200
<v Speaker 1>article in Bloomberg Business week, while more musical chairs at Disney,

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:34.600
<v Speaker 1>CEO Bob Chpeck has abruptly fired the head of Television,

0:08:34.840 --> 0:08:38.400
<v Speaker 1>Peter Rice, for not being a team player. According to

0:08:38.400 --> 0:08:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg sources, Rice was chair of General Entertainment Content and

0:08:42.679 --> 0:08:47.400
<v Speaker 1>oversaw a vast swath of shows carried across Disney Networks.

0:08:47.600 --> 0:08:50.200
<v Speaker 1>The sudden firing is the latest twist and a tumultuous

0:08:50.200 --> 0:08:53.320
<v Speaker 1>stretch for tape Chpeck. His leadership has come under scrutiny

0:08:53.360 --> 0:08:55.680
<v Speaker 1>over the last year as he wrestled with challenges that

0:08:55.720 --> 0:08:58.960
<v Speaker 1>included a high profile dust stop with Florida Governor Rohnda

0:08:59.040 --> 0:09:03.319
<v Speaker 1>Santis over a new law limiting discussion of sexual identity

0:09:03.679 --> 0:09:15.640
<v Speaker 1>in classrooms. We're learning more about Apple's jump into the

0:09:15.679 --> 0:09:18.559
<v Speaker 1>buy now, pay later business. The company will actually handle lending,

0:09:18.600 --> 0:09:21.599
<v Speaker 1>including credit checks, with a new business called Apple Financing,

0:09:21.679 --> 0:09:26.360
<v Speaker 1>marking a significant further push into financial services. Some see

0:09:26.360 --> 0:09:28.680
<v Speaker 1>this push as a threat to the more established players,

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:32.360
<v Speaker 1>including a firm and Clarina. But is it joining me now?

0:09:32.440 --> 0:09:36.240
<v Speaker 1>Sebastian Schimakowsky, CEO and co founder of Clarina and Sebastian

0:09:36.280 --> 0:09:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I was at Apple when they were unveiling this and

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:43.360
<v Speaker 1>everyone immediately thought about companies like Clarina and a firm

0:09:43.400 --> 0:09:47.599
<v Speaker 1>you tweeted that plagiarism is the highest form of flattery.

0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:52.760
<v Speaker 1>But are you worried that this could hurt your business? Not? Right?

0:09:52.800 --> 0:09:55.000
<v Speaker 1>For first of almost like, I think it's a great

0:09:55.040 --> 0:09:57.800
<v Speaker 1>win for consumers world one that Apple is now embracing

0:09:57.880 --> 0:10:01.280
<v Speaker 1>a better form of consuming credit. Um, we're looking at

0:10:01.320 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 1>an industry of retail banking payments that you know has

0:10:05.160 --> 0:10:08.359
<v Speaker 1>an addressable market of four hundred forty billion dollars worldwide,

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 1>and it has been constructed in a way traditionally where

0:10:11.600 --> 0:10:14.440
<v Speaker 1>credit cards have been making it fortune by trying to

0:10:14.480 --> 0:10:17.360
<v Speaker 1>get us to revolve at high interest rates once we

0:10:17.440 --> 0:10:20.160
<v Speaker 1>get that prayer card statement every month. And this form

0:10:20.200 --> 0:10:23.360
<v Speaker 1>of credit is better for consumers. So I think it's

0:10:23.440 --> 0:10:26.080
<v Speaker 1>it's it's fantastic, And Plana has been offering this form

0:10:26.080 --> 0:10:28.880
<v Speaker 1>of credit for a while. I actually would be mostly

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 1>worried if I was one of those predre card banks

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:34.120
<v Speaker 1>who embraced Apple Pay. Was so happy to embrace this

0:10:34.160 --> 0:10:38.400
<v Speaker 1>new technology and now suddenly find myself having this company

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 1>in front of my credit card promoting an interest free

0:10:42.200 --> 0:10:45.640
<v Speaker 1>credit instead of my forty percent revolving credit one and

0:10:45.679 --> 0:10:50.679
<v Speaker 1>then pushing the customer to another provider. I that that's

0:10:50.720 --> 0:10:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the that to be should be the big headline of

0:10:52.880 --> 0:10:55.240
<v Speaker 1>this news for US. I mean, Flana has a hundred

0:10:55.280 --> 0:10:58.640
<v Speaker 1>fifty million users worldwide, where one of the largest third

0:10:58.640 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 1>party globe and payment networks in the world. Paying for

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:04.800
<v Speaker 1>is a fantastic product. It has done tremendously well for

0:11:04.880 --> 0:11:06.360
<v Speaker 1>us in the US and helped us a lot to

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:09.320
<v Speaker 1>gain recognition and so forth. But people are using us

0:11:09.640 --> 0:11:12.520
<v Speaker 1>for a lot of reasons, one not the least being

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:15.200
<v Speaker 1>the fact that we're the richest data payments networks in

0:11:15.200 --> 0:11:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the world because we have skew level data and digital

0:11:17.160 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 1>receipts on every transaction, allowing us to create a much

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:24.440
<v Speaker 1>richard consumer experience. Transactions are debit, not even credit. People

0:11:24.480 --> 0:11:27.280
<v Speaker 1>don't know that um and so forth. So so I mean,

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:30.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm working. I always think competition is nice, and I'm

0:11:30.520 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm also fortunate to have a neighbor here in Daniel X,

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:35.720
<v Speaker 1>the founder of Spotify, who has has can give me

0:11:35.760 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 1>some tips on how to compete with Apple successfully. Obviously good.

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Good to know that you and Eck are friendly. I

0:11:44.120 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 1>also spoke with a firm CEO, Max Election he similarly,

0:11:48.520 --> 0:11:50.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, said it was a win for consumers, but

0:11:50.120 --> 0:11:53.800
<v Speaker 1>he also said something else. Take a listen why I'm

0:11:53.800 --> 0:11:57.720
<v Speaker 1>not particually worried about Apple pay entering the bioppulator space.

0:11:58.520 --> 0:12:01.319
<v Speaker 1>They're focused on the can into the six week product,

0:12:01.480 --> 0:12:04.000
<v Speaker 1>which I think is great and display of competitors, and

0:12:04.040 --> 0:12:07.319
<v Speaker 1>they should be worried. I think this spells a certain

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:09.680
<v Speaker 1>level of concern for folks that are really specialized in

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:14.040
<v Speaker 1>this really short term product. That's not calling out Klina.

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 1>He might, you know, it's funny me and act of

0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:22.800
<v Speaker 1>a long history. I remember presenting Clana at depth, trying

0:12:22.800 --> 0:12:24.559
<v Speaker 1>to recruit him as a board member, and then being

0:12:24.559 --> 0:12:28.040
<v Speaker 1>surprised by him announcing a firm six months later. Um,

0:12:28.200 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 1>so we have if we have a we have a

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:34.559
<v Speaker 1>fun history me and Max. But look, I think, look,

0:12:35.320 --> 0:12:38.559
<v Speaker 1>they're very distinctly He's He's very accurate about one thing,

0:12:38.559 --> 0:12:40.720
<v Speaker 1>and that is that Clana and a firm are distinctly

0:12:40.760 --> 0:12:46.280
<v Speaker 1>different businesses. If I've understood the firm's reporting correct, their

0:12:46.280 --> 0:12:52.679
<v Speaker 1>businesses is um is financing, long term financing. If I

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:57.640
<v Speaker 1>understand correct reports online, fifty of their UM of their

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 1>balance credit is priced at only five to interest rate

0:13:02.600 --> 0:13:04.800
<v Speaker 1>rates that we don't even go up to Plana max.

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:07.600
<v Speaker 1>My maxisized at twenty five. So it's a very different

0:13:07.600 --> 0:13:12.720
<v Speaker 1>businesses lending high ticket items to people that think interest

0:13:12.800 --> 0:13:15.880
<v Speaker 1>rate is attracted. Clina is that pay interest free product.

0:13:16.120 --> 0:13:18.760
<v Speaker 1>It's a payments product. We have the largest account to

0:13:18.760 --> 0:13:21.280
<v Speaker 1>account based payments network in the world. So these these

0:13:21.320 --> 0:13:25.280
<v Speaker 1>are distinct different businesses and and and so yes, I

0:13:25.280 --> 0:13:27.160
<v Speaker 1>think that in that I agree with him, and I

0:13:27.200 --> 0:13:30.200
<v Speaker 1>don't think it's accuracy. So some some shots fired there.

0:13:30.200 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna have to get Max to respond to that.

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:34.560
<v Speaker 1>You know. He also talked about how a firm. He

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:36.640
<v Speaker 1>also talked about how a firm is hiring and Clarina

0:13:36.760 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 1>did have some layoffs recently. I believe you and I

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:41.679
<v Speaker 1>was planned to lay off ten percent of your workforce.

0:13:42.080 --> 0:13:44.440
<v Speaker 1>When you look back, do you see any mistakes in

0:13:44.480 --> 0:13:48.559
<v Speaker 1>your execution? And you know, does this mean that you're

0:13:48.640 --> 0:13:52.640
<v Speaker 1>kind of slightly less optimistic about how big the market

0:13:52.679 --> 0:13:56.080
<v Speaker 1>can be for Klina than you work? No, I think

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:58.680
<v Speaker 1>look for us, there's a long term opportunity in this

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:01.440
<v Speaker 1>which has been that I believe we're going through a

0:14:01.520 --> 0:14:05.440
<v Speaker 1>similar revolution in retail banking and payments that retail went

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:07.800
<v Speaker 1>through ten years ago. You remember, I've been running Plan

0:14:07.880 --> 0:14:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Up for fourteen seventeen years now, where of the fourteen

0:14:11.960 --> 0:14:16.440
<v Speaker 1>first year we're profitable um and and I went through

0:14:16.440 --> 0:14:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the financial crisis with this company two thousand seven and

0:14:18.679 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 1>two thousand a. So, but what happened in the last

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 1>two years is that we've been very focused on establishing

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:26.600
<v Speaker 1>yourselves in the US. We're proudly we have twenty five

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:29.360
<v Speaker 1>million users that we see, you know, Macy's and Support

0:14:29.440 --> 0:14:32.280
<v Speaker 1>and big fantastic brands in the U S adopted Klan

0:14:32.400 --> 0:14:34.800
<v Speaker 1>and it is offering Klan Up today. So it's been

0:14:34.800 --> 0:14:37.880
<v Speaker 1>a very very um a time where we've been investing

0:14:37.920 --> 0:14:40.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot, and it's been very clear, as I think

0:14:40.120 --> 0:14:42.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of other companies in the US have understood

0:14:42.280 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 1>now as well, that there is a shift in investors.

0:14:45.160 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, investors being entirely focused on asking for what

0:14:48.560 --> 0:14:51.360
<v Speaker 1>are you doing to grow faster six to nine months ago,

0:14:51.400 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 1>are now starting to ask questions about profitability and softwath

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:56.000
<v Speaker 1>And again we have the benefit of having been a

0:14:56.040 --> 0:14:57.920
<v Speaker 1>profitable company for a lot of for a long period

0:14:57.920 --> 0:15:01.040
<v Speaker 1>of time. We now invested heavily. We we we said, look

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:03.360
<v Speaker 1>the in goal is exactly the same that it has

0:15:03.400 --> 0:15:05.960
<v Speaker 1>always been, but it's going to be a slightly different

0:15:06.000 --> 0:15:08.880
<v Speaker 1>path towards that, and the unfortunately led us to something

0:15:08.920 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 1>that you know, I find obviously very sad that we

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:14.920
<v Speaker 1>as a consequence of that, decided to make changes to

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:17.480
<v Speaker 1>how the order looks and how it's set up, and

0:15:17.480 --> 0:15:22.720
<v Speaker 1>that has led us to suggest and ask people to uh,

0:15:22.760 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, offer them severance packages and so forth, and

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:27.800
<v Speaker 1>as some people to to leave Plana, which is abviously

0:15:27.840 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 1>very sad because I think this is all amazing talent,

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 1>amazing people that you know have have contributed to the company.

0:15:33.600 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>So it's a sad thing to do, but I think

0:15:35.600 --> 0:15:38.960
<v Speaker 1>it's it's the right thing considering how the marketing look nowadays,

0:15:39.000 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 1>and I think it will set up up even better

0:15:41.760 --> 0:15:45.600
<v Speaker 1>for for future success going forward. Now in this new

0:15:45.680 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 1>in this new market environment that we're in. Well, I

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:49.880
<v Speaker 1>know you made quite a move and shared some of

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:53.480
<v Speaker 1>their their details, which um, I hope they're getting some

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:56.880
<v Speaker 1>inbound all of that great talent um. As you've said,

0:15:56.920 --> 0:15:59.040
<v Speaker 1>the goal is to become the world's largest retail bank.

0:15:59.600 --> 0:16:03.080
<v Speaker 1>Given regulation, given the changing competitive landscape, how far out

0:16:03.120 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 1>is that vision In the United States? And abroad. No,

0:16:07.640 --> 0:16:12.040
<v Speaker 1>we're quite far actually ahead. Right. So I to me, like,

0:16:12.200 --> 0:16:14.000
<v Speaker 1>if you look at this from a future perspective, what

0:16:14.040 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I believe in, what I believe a longer time is

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:19.000
<v Speaker 1>that like someday in the future, you wake up in

0:16:19.040 --> 0:16:22.479
<v Speaker 1>the morning, your computer says to your your financial assistant,

0:16:22.480 --> 0:16:24.920
<v Speaker 1>Digital as system says, hey have analyzed your mortgage, tonyed

0:16:24.960 --> 0:16:27.360
<v Speaker 1>I realized it, could you know, save you x amount

0:16:27.360 --> 0:16:29.680
<v Speaker 1>of the nars by shifting from supplier A to supplier B.

0:16:30.360 --> 0:16:32.440
<v Speaker 1>And the only thing you need to say yes, it's

0:16:32.440 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 1>a little bit like self driving cars. I don't know

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:36.240
<v Speaker 1>when it's going to happen, but I do know it

0:16:36.280 --> 0:16:39.360
<v Speaker 1>will happen. So the future of banking is very different

0:16:39.400 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 1>to what we've traditionally seen, where banks have been obsessed

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:45.120
<v Speaker 1>with what they called maximizing interest rate spread, meaning you know,

0:16:45.200 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 1>giving the positors as a little as possible and then

0:16:47.400 --> 0:16:50.520
<v Speaker 1>borrowing it out the highest possible interest rate. The true

0:16:50.560 --> 0:16:53.640
<v Speaker 1>future retail banking financial services is somebody's on the consumer

0:16:53.680 --> 0:16:56.560
<v Speaker 1>side trying to help them save time, save money, make

0:16:56.880 --> 0:16:59.320
<v Speaker 1>you the less worried about their finances. And it's been

0:16:59.400 --> 0:17:02.400
<v Speaker 1>very clear to me that that who those five or

0:17:02.440 --> 0:17:05.439
<v Speaker 1>four large companies that will dominate that space in the

0:17:05.480 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 1>next ten years on a global basis will be that

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 1>somebody's global and somebody has a banking background and it's

0:17:11.119 --> 0:17:13.040
<v Speaker 1>willing to pursue that. There will be some tech companies

0:17:13.040 --> 0:17:15.960
<v Speaker 1>pursuing that. We see Apple now pursuing some of that.

0:17:16.040 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 1>There will be some fin techs, and there will be

0:17:18.359 --> 0:17:20.760
<v Speaker 1>some traditional banks. And I think Planna would have hundred

0:17:20.760 --> 0:17:23.639
<v Speaker 1>fifty million users and with a data set that is

0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:25.879
<v Speaker 1>much richer than anyone else due to the you know

0:17:25.920 --> 0:17:28.119
<v Speaker 1>the fact that we have skew level data on all transactions.

0:17:28.160 --> 0:17:31.359
<v Speaker 1>It's giving us a tremendous opportunity to lead the game

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:34.199
<v Speaker 1>in providing more value for consumers and really be on

0:17:34.240 --> 0:17:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the consumer side. And I'm also happy now that even

0:17:36.600 --> 0:17:39.000
<v Speaker 1>though media has questioned things like buying now, pay later,

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:41.399
<v Speaker 1>we're seeing other people adopting and recognizing that this is

0:17:41.440 --> 0:17:43.080
<v Speaker 1>a better form of credit as well. So I think

0:17:43.080 --> 0:17:45.160
<v Speaker 1>it's verifying a lot of the assumptions that we've had,

0:17:45.359 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 1>and so I feel very excited about it. Sebastian Chimakowsky,

0:17:48.680 --> 0:17:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Corner CEO, thank you for joining us as always coming up.

0:17:53.080 --> 0:17:58.200
<v Speaker 1>Meta is now a leader in another social media trend lawsuits.

0:17:58.600 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Why the company has been sued more than half a

0:18:00.880 --> 0:18:04.640
<v Speaker 1>dozen times just in the last week. That is next.

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:13.800
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg. In the last week, eight lawsuits have

0:18:13.840 --> 0:18:16.760
<v Speaker 1>been filed across the country against Meta, the suits alleging

0:18:16.800 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 1>that the company built algorithms leading young people into addiction.

0:18:21.359 --> 0:18:24.399
<v Speaker 1>For more, I'm joined now by Bloomberg's Alafi Nayak Malthy.

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Thank you so much for joining us. So what kind

0:18:25.920 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 1>of addiction are you talking about here? So? The users

0:18:28.480 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 1>who suit Meta claiming that Facebook and Instagram have created

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:37.680
<v Speaker 1>algorithms and products that keep users hooked onto um its platforms,

0:18:37.760 --> 0:18:41.119
<v Speaker 1>especially young users, and that they promote excessive use of

0:18:41.200 --> 0:18:45.280
<v Speaker 1>these platforms through these algorithms. The claiming that Meta knew

0:18:45.400 --> 0:18:49.000
<v Speaker 1>that these algorithms were problematic, that they would lead to

0:18:49.080 --> 0:18:52.639
<v Speaker 1>issues such as eating disorders a d h D, and

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:57.560
<v Speaker 1>depression among young users, but that the company continued to

0:18:57.640 --> 0:19:00.720
<v Speaker 1>keep these products and services going to drive profit. This

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:04.359
<v Speaker 1>echoes what the Facebook whistle blower quote unquote Francis Halgan

0:19:04.400 --> 0:19:09.160
<v Speaker 1>testified to Congress about how is Facebook responding? So Facebook

0:19:09.200 --> 0:19:13.679
<v Speaker 1>hasn't responded in court as yet, but spokesperson declined to

0:19:13.720 --> 0:19:17.879
<v Speaker 1>comment because it is active litigation. But she did point

0:19:17.880 --> 0:19:21.400
<v Speaker 1>to some efforts by Facebook recently such as having tools

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:26.080
<v Speaker 1>um for parents to control screen time and also enough

0:19:26.200 --> 0:19:29.679
<v Speaker 1>resources like having these little pop up messages that come up.

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:32.760
<v Speaker 1>If a user looks for information on and eating disorder,

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:35.160
<v Speaker 1>for example, then there will be some tips and resources

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 1>that will pop up on screen to sort of help

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the help the young user deal with certain issues. Are

0:19:40.000 --> 0:19:43.720
<v Speaker 1>these lawsuits coordinated so there are a bunch of firms.

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 1>There's one group in Seattle, and then there's another firm

0:19:46.840 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 1>called Beasley Allen which just filed these eight suits in

0:19:49.320 --> 0:19:51.920
<v Speaker 1>the last week. UM. So at some point they could

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 1>all get consolidated in court, but right now their separate

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:59.040
<v Speaker 1>efforts interesting. Gos Mouth and I thank you, thank you

0:19:59.080 --> 0:20:10.000
<v Speaker 1>for that update. Welcome back to Bloomer Technology and Emily

0:20:10.040 --> 0:20:13.119
<v Speaker 1>Chang in San Francisco. We have heard so much about

0:20:13.280 --> 0:20:15.680
<v Speaker 1>mental health over the last few years as we've all

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:18.639
<v Speaker 1>had to navigate the uncertainty of a pandemic from home

0:20:19.040 --> 0:20:21.960
<v Speaker 1>to work. This is why Thrive has partnered with the

0:20:22.040 --> 0:20:24.720
<v Speaker 1>Society for Human Resource Management to get some of the

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:28.760
<v Speaker 1>biggest companies from Microsoft to Salesforce, Cisco, Uber, and Walmart

0:20:29.119 --> 0:20:32.440
<v Speaker 1>to make a commitment to employees mental health and well being.

0:20:32.640 --> 0:20:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Joining me right now, Founder and CEO of Thrive, Arianna

0:20:35.800 --> 0:20:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Huffington's Arianna, great to have you back with us. So

0:20:39.240 --> 0:20:44.919
<v Speaker 1>what exactly are these companies committing to do? So Basically,

0:20:45.000 --> 0:20:50.000
<v Speaker 1>they're committing during the staff economic times ahead, not to

0:20:50.160 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 1>cut mental health and well being offerings to their employees

0:20:54.920 --> 0:20:57.399
<v Speaker 1>as you know, and really offered. The last two years,

0:20:57.440 --> 0:21:02.280
<v Speaker 1>we've seen an incredible increase offered. Ninety companies have increased

0:21:02.280 --> 0:21:05.840
<v Speaker 1>their mental health and well being offerings to their employees.

0:21:05.960 --> 0:21:10.240
<v Speaker 1>Over the last two years, practically every company became also

0:21:10.280 --> 0:21:14.640
<v Speaker 1>a healthcare company. And these are amazing advances, and US

0:21:14.720 --> 0:21:17.920
<v Speaker 1>companies are making tough decisions. So we wanted to make

0:21:17.960 --> 0:21:21.000
<v Speaker 1>sure that there was a real commitment not to cut

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:25.439
<v Speaker 1>down these fundamental services, especially at the time when the

0:21:25.560 --> 0:21:30.440
<v Speaker 1>mental health crisis is seen as the second pandemic, and

0:21:30.960 --> 0:21:34.199
<v Speaker 1>we were thrilled with a response. Within a week, we

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:42.720
<v Speaker 1>got over eighty both Fortune ten companies and also high

0:21:42.760 --> 0:21:48.480
<v Speaker 1>growth startups to join the pledgere and sign up. Now,

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:51.159
<v Speaker 1>we've been hearing a lot of talk about mental health lately.

0:21:51.359 --> 0:21:55.440
<v Speaker 1>It's also being blamed for gun violence. I'm curious if

0:21:55.480 --> 0:22:00.919
<v Speaker 1>you think this issue is being politicized. Well, mental um

0:22:01.200 --> 0:22:06.320
<v Speaker 1>crisis is real, and everything is being politicized today. But

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:11.560
<v Speaker 1>the truth is that we've seen unprecedented numbers of depression

0:22:11.840 --> 0:22:16.120
<v Speaker 1>and anxiety, and that we know there is a lot

0:22:16.240 --> 0:22:20.159
<v Speaker 1>that can be done by changing our everyday habits around sleep,

0:22:20.640 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 1>around food, around the thought we hold in our heads

0:22:24.400 --> 0:22:27.520
<v Speaker 1>to change outcomes. And that's one of the things that

0:22:27.680 --> 0:22:33.040
<v Speaker 1>companies are doing. Beyond just the medical intervention if things

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:35.480
<v Speaker 1>get really bad, there is a lot we can do

0:22:35.960 --> 0:22:41.879
<v Speaker 1>about prevention. So the question is how, and and often

0:22:42.080 --> 0:22:46.960
<v Speaker 1>how much is our own tech obsessed culture making all

0:22:47.000 --> 0:22:49.359
<v Speaker 1>of this work worse. You and I have talked about

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:52.239
<v Speaker 1>Facebook and now Meta, which you know, as we were

0:22:52.280 --> 0:22:54.959
<v Speaker 1>just discussing in a segment earlier, is being sued across

0:22:55.000 --> 0:23:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the country for knowingly coaxing teens into different four of addiction.

0:23:01.600 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 1>What do you make of that narrative? So obviously I

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:09.679
<v Speaker 1>don't know the details of the lawsuit, but what I

0:23:09.800 --> 0:23:15.200
<v Speaker 1>do know, and what every parent knows, is that managing

0:23:15.480 --> 0:23:20.879
<v Speaker 1>the relationship of their children to technology, to social media

0:23:21.080 --> 0:23:24.640
<v Speaker 1>is really hard. You and I were talking about your

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 1>nine year old son and how long can you wait

0:23:28.520 --> 0:23:33.320
<v Speaker 1>before he even gets a phone, and that's something that's

0:23:33.359 --> 0:23:39.600
<v Speaker 1>based on observation. At Drive. We launched a dedicated curriculum

0:23:39.720 --> 0:23:43.040
<v Speaker 1>called Thriving Kids because one of the companies who work

0:23:43.119 --> 0:23:47.720
<v Speaker 1>with Fighter saw the concern that working parents are having

0:23:48.440 --> 0:23:53.879
<v Speaker 1>over the relationship of their children to their phones, to

0:23:54.080 --> 0:24:00.800
<v Speaker 1>social media, the growing skyrocketing rates of depression and anxiety

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:05.280
<v Speaker 1>among children and teenagers. It's a huge issue and I'm

0:24:05.320 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 1>so glad you're looking at it more closely. I also

0:24:08.400 --> 0:24:10.840
<v Speaker 1>have to ask you about Cheryl Samberg because I know

0:24:10.920 --> 0:24:14.520
<v Speaker 1>you're close friends, and we've seen this great resignation happening

0:24:14.520 --> 0:24:16.760
<v Speaker 1>across the country and around the world, and some people

0:24:16.800 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't expect to see Cheryl Samberg be part of it.

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:23.919
<v Speaker 1>Were you surprised how long she stayed or do you

0:24:23.960 --> 0:24:26.560
<v Speaker 1>have any more insights into why she left? And now

0:24:28.400 --> 0:24:33.919
<v Speaker 1>I am very very proud of her for taking that step.

0:24:34.119 --> 0:24:36.520
<v Speaker 1>You know, Emily here and I have talked a lot

0:24:36.600 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 1>about women, and so often I talked to friends in

0:24:41.040 --> 0:24:46.240
<v Speaker 1>big corporate jobs who have stopped really feeling that that's

0:24:46.240 --> 0:24:48.600
<v Speaker 1>what they want to be doing. But so many women

0:24:49.000 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 1>and men, but especially women become so identified with their

0:24:53.400 --> 0:24:57.320
<v Speaker 1>jobs and we know from everything Cheryl has done beyond

0:24:57.840 --> 0:25:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Facebook with a lean in circles, with her work with

0:25:02.040 --> 0:25:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Option B helping people who experienced loss to rebuild their lives,

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:09.920
<v Speaker 1>that this is an amazing new chapter for her. And

0:25:10.560 --> 0:25:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I profoundly believe that life comes in chapters, you know.

0:25:14.160 --> 0:25:18.280
<v Speaker 1>I I've had many chapters myself, and I remember when

0:25:18.320 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I was debating leaving the having done post to launch Thrive,

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:26.720
<v Speaker 1>I actually called Cheryl and she gave me the advice

0:25:26.800 --> 0:25:30.439
<v Speaker 1>to just take a deep breath, close my eyes and jump.

0:25:30.760 --> 0:25:35.800
<v Speaker 1>And these changes, these jumps require carriage. It's always easier

0:25:35.880 --> 0:25:39.119
<v Speaker 1>to stay where you are, especially when staying where you

0:25:39.160 --> 0:25:43.760
<v Speaker 1>are is a huge job. Well, that's a perfect segue

0:25:43.840 --> 0:25:46.080
<v Speaker 1>to my next question, because you know a thing or

0:25:46.119 --> 0:25:49.160
<v Speaker 1>two about owning a media company. And I'm so curious

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:51.800
<v Speaker 1>what you think of Elon Musk and his bid to

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 1>buy Twitter. I know you gave him some advice back

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:57.880
<v Speaker 1>in to sleep More. I'm not sure if he took it,

0:25:57.960 --> 0:26:00.760
<v Speaker 1>but any advice for him now? I mean, do you

0:26:00.800 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 1>think he's a good owner? Will he be a good

0:26:03.760 --> 0:26:08.200
<v Speaker 1>owner for Twitter if it happens? Well, first of all, Emilie,

0:26:08.400 --> 0:26:12.879
<v Speaker 1>are you surprised that a company like Twitter that thrives

0:26:13.000 --> 0:26:17.240
<v Speaker 1>on drama and conflict is engulfed in more drama and

0:26:17.320 --> 0:26:22.080
<v Speaker 1>conflict with a man who enjoys drama and conflict. I'm

0:26:22.119 --> 0:26:26.399
<v Speaker 1>actually much more interested in a learn's decision to bring

0:26:27.880 --> 0:26:32.120
<v Speaker 1>everybody back to the office full time. I think that's

0:26:32.119 --> 0:26:36.119
<v Speaker 1>going to become a very key decision for companies and

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:40.040
<v Speaker 1>for me. What's being missed from this conversation is that

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:44.000
<v Speaker 1>more important than where people are working is how they're working.

0:26:44.640 --> 0:26:48.440
<v Speaker 1>And again, in the same way, with a mental health pledge,

0:26:48.520 --> 0:26:54.560
<v Speaker 1>we want to avoid regressing into the pre pandemic past.

0:26:55.200 --> 0:26:59.320
<v Speaker 1>The same applies here. We need to avoid regressing into

0:26:59.359 --> 0:27:05.000
<v Speaker 1>cultures driven by burnout, and that means that whether people

0:27:05.160 --> 0:27:11.320
<v Speaker 1>work in a hybrid environment, remote or back in the office,

0:27:12.520 --> 0:27:16.120
<v Speaker 1>everybody has to be much more intentional about the new

0:27:16.119 --> 0:27:20.480
<v Speaker 1>work order. We cannot pretend and that we can unring

0:27:20.680 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 1>the bell that millions of people worked remote and did

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:26.679
<v Speaker 1>a lot of good work. But we need to become

0:27:26.760 --> 0:27:32.040
<v Speaker 1>much more intentional about building the social capital that we

0:27:32.119 --> 0:27:36.000
<v Speaker 1>do lose when people are not physically together all the time,

0:27:36.800 --> 0:27:39.399
<v Speaker 1>and that means not having people come back to the

0:27:39.480 --> 0:27:43.680
<v Speaker 1>office to take zoom calls from their cubicles. That means

0:27:43.840 --> 0:27:47.240
<v Speaker 1>and that's a priority for us at Thrive. Being much

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:52.160
<v Speaker 1>more intentional about onboarding, we include something called the Entry interview,

0:27:52.920 --> 0:27:58.159
<v Speaker 1>being much more intentional about hybrid rituals, like something we

0:27:58.280 --> 0:28:02.240
<v Speaker 1>call reset, where people create their own sixty second reset

0:28:02.320 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 1>of what gives them joy and share them. A teamm thinks,

0:28:05.880 --> 0:28:08.800
<v Speaker 1>so a lot of work has to be done to

0:28:08.920 --> 0:28:15.120
<v Speaker 1>navigate the new world order, and whatever Mordel a company chooses,

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:19.160
<v Speaker 1>you cannot unring the bell. We will try to get

0:28:19.160 --> 0:28:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Ellen that advice Arianna, maybe via Twitter, since that seems

0:28:23.800 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 1>to be where he is hanging out. Arianna Huffington's founder

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:29.520
<v Speaker 1>and CEO of Thrive. Always love having you here on

0:28:29.520 --> 0:28:33.879
<v Speaker 1>the show. Thank you for stopping by. Alright, Coming up,

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:36.720
<v Speaker 1>the future of crypto regulation. How a Democratic and Republican

0:28:36.800 --> 0:28:40.400
<v Speaker 1>senator are taking a stab at working on this together.

0:28:40.600 --> 0:28:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Senators Kirsten Gillibrand and Cynthia Lammas joined me. Coming up,

0:28:44.600 --> 0:29:04.760
<v Speaker 1>this is Bloomberg Time now for our crypto reporting. Today

0:29:04.760 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 1>we are talking crypto regulation. A new bill that could

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:10.880
<v Speaker 1>help clarify which digital currencies are commodities and which our

0:29:11.080 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 1>securities just got new support from the CFTC the Commodities

0:29:15.120 --> 0:29:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Futures Trading Commission, while the bill would give them more power.

0:29:18.560 --> 0:29:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I sat down earlier with Senator's Cares and Gillibrand from

0:29:21.560 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 1>New York and Cynthia Lammas from Riot, Wyoming, who wrote

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:27.560
<v Speaker 1>the bill. Take a listen to what they had to say.

0:29:28.200 --> 0:29:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't think any bill can satisfy everyone, but I

0:29:31.520 --> 0:29:34.040
<v Speaker 1>think this is a really great start because our goals

0:29:34.040 --> 0:29:36.720
<v Speaker 1>are simple. We want to create safety and soundness in

0:29:36.760 --> 0:29:40.840
<v Speaker 1>the American market. We want transparency and accountability, and we

0:29:40.880 --> 0:29:44.640
<v Speaker 1>want to have consumer protections. And most industry players want

0:29:44.720 --> 0:29:46.440
<v Speaker 1>to have rules of the road so they know they

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:48.239
<v Speaker 1>can count on it, so they know that they can

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:51.120
<v Speaker 1>create a business plan and know that that's consistent with

0:29:51.120 --> 0:29:53.720
<v Speaker 1>what US laws are likely going to be. And so

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:57.240
<v Speaker 1>what Sarah Loves and I worked on is a comprehensive

0:29:57.240 --> 0:30:00.959
<v Speaker 1>framework to give guidance about which digital assets will be

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 1>regulated through the CFTC, which will be regulated through the

0:30:04.560 --> 0:30:08.920
<v Speaker 1>sec UM, giving I r S jurisdiction overall, making sure

0:30:09.320 --> 0:30:12.000
<v Speaker 1>we have rules for stable coins and o c C.

0:30:12.560 --> 0:30:15.840
<v Speaker 1>So we're doing the work that it takes to create

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:21.000
<v Speaker 1>that stability and create the essential transparency that this industry

0:30:21.080 --> 0:30:24.320
<v Speaker 1>wants and needs to thrive. Our goal is not to overregulate.

0:30:24.360 --> 0:30:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Our goal is to have exactly the right amount of

0:30:28.480 --> 0:30:32.000
<v Speaker 1>oversight so that the industry can actually thrive, grow, and

0:30:32.040 --> 0:30:35.240
<v Speaker 1>continue to innovate in the United States. On that note,

0:30:35.240 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 1>Senator Lamas, Wyoming is steeped in the history of the

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:40.800
<v Speaker 1>wild West and a lot of investors are attracted to

0:30:40.800 --> 0:30:44.080
<v Speaker 1>crypto because it is unregulated. How do you strike the

0:30:44.160 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 1>right balance here, Well, we have decided to use the

0:30:50.600 --> 0:30:56.960
<v Speaker 1>existing regulatory structure for traditional assets UH and lay the

0:30:57.200 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 1>structure for digital assets on top of it. That's why

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:06.600
<v Speaker 1>we're using the Commodity Futures Trading Commission UH, the SEC,

0:31:07.440 --> 0:31:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and UH the I R S UH in their traditional roles. So,

0:31:13.320 --> 0:31:17.440
<v Speaker 1>for example, bitcoin is clearly a commodity, so it will

0:31:17.480 --> 0:31:21.600
<v Speaker 1>fall under the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. So will the

0:31:21.640 --> 0:31:25.840
<v Speaker 1>spot market in the futures market, and Ethereum is almost

0:31:25.840 --> 0:31:29.160
<v Speaker 1>certainly a commodity, and there are few others that will

0:31:29.240 --> 0:31:33.719
<v Speaker 1>almost certainly be commodities, they will fall under the CFTC.

0:31:34.680 --> 0:31:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Then something that meets the Howie test, which is a

0:31:37.800 --> 0:31:42.760
<v Speaker 1>court based test for what constitutes a security, will put

0:31:42.800 --> 0:31:48.320
<v Speaker 1>those cryptocurrencies under the SEC, and the SEC has a

0:31:48.480 --> 0:31:54.320
<v Speaker 1>strong history of being good at disclosures and consumer protection,

0:31:54.920 --> 0:31:59.080
<v Speaker 1>so we believe we've found the right balance between these

0:31:59.080 --> 0:32:03.000
<v Speaker 1>two agencies. The vast majority of these in terms of

0:32:03.120 --> 0:32:07.800
<v Speaker 1>market share, will be under the Commodity Futures Trading Commission,

0:32:08.080 --> 0:32:13.120
<v Speaker 1>but the largest number of cryptocurrencies will probably fall under

0:32:13.160 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the SEC. And yet there's no real broad agreement on

0:32:17.480 --> 0:32:22.840
<v Speaker 1>whether cryptocurrencies are commodities or security. Senator Jillibrand, I'm so curious,

0:32:22.840 --> 0:32:25.120
<v Speaker 1>which do you think our commodities? Which do you think

0:32:25.360 --> 0:32:28.600
<v Speaker 1>our securities? So I think Senator love Us just answer

0:32:28.680 --> 0:32:32.240
<v Speaker 1>that question perfectly. And the way we have the structure

0:32:32.320 --> 0:32:35.760
<v Speaker 1>this oversight is by purpose. What is the purpose of

0:32:35.800 --> 0:32:39.600
<v Speaker 1>your digital asset? Do you meet the TAWI test um?

0:32:39.640 --> 0:32:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Are you like a company that's offering a stock to

0:32:43.160 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 1>raise money for your company to fund your company? If

0:32:45.480 --> 0:32:48.240
<v Speaker 1>that's what you're doing with your digital asset, you are

0:32:48.280 --> 0:32:51.640
<v Speaker 1>there for a security. And so it is there an

0:32:51.640 --> 0:32:54.840
<v Speaker 1>issuer is the issue or giving you something of value? Um?

0:32:54.960 --> 0:32:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Is it something that's based on the managerial expertise of

0:32:57.800 --> 0:33:03.520
<v Speaker 1>the issuer. Those are all characteristics of securities, and so

0:33:03.600 --> 0:33:06.920
<v Speaker 1>it depends it's not the name cryptocurrency that decides where

0:33:06.960 --> 0:33:10.480
<v Speaker 1>you go. It's the purpose of the digital asset that

0:33:10.600 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 1>you are offering to the public for sale that's going

0:33:13.600 --> 0:33:16.800
<v Speaker 1>to affect who's your regulator. You know, it's wonderful to

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:21.600
<v Speaker 1>see two people from different ends of Congress working together

0:33:21.880 --> 0:33:26.120
<v Speaker 1>and you found common ground on this issue of crypto.

0:33:26.360 --> 0:33:30.160
<v Speaker 1>Is there space in one of the most polarizing of debates,

0:33:30.200 --> 0:33:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the gun controlled debate, in which you two could collaborate

0:33:33.280 --> 0:33:38.200
<v Speaker 1>as well. Well, there's a bipartisan working group right now

0:33:38.240 --> 0:33:41.080
<v Speaker 1>that we're not part of. But yes, there is always

0:33:41.120 --> 0:33:44.160
<v Speaker 1>common ground, and that bipartisan working group right now is

0:33:44.240 --> 0:33:46.520
<v Speaker 1>figuring out where does it lie. Does it lie in

0:33:46.920 --> 0:33:50.400
<v Speaker 1>reforming some aspect of background checks, does it lie in

0:33:50.480 --> 0:33:53.800
<v Speaker 1>some aspect of red flag laws. Gun trafficking is an

0:33:53.840 --> 0:33:57.880
<v Speaker 1>area of common ground, always bipartisan, because it's just giving

0:33:57.920 --> 0:34:01.400
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement the ability to our state lines to find

0:34:02.160 --> 0:34:05.920
<v Speaker 1>gun traffickers who are by nature criminal networks, giving guns

0:34:05.960 --> 0:34:09.480
<v Speaker 1>directly to criminals. So those are areas where I suspect

0:34:09.480 --> 0:34:12.200
<v Speaker 1>there will be some common ground, but we are not

0:34:12.280 --> 0:34:15.160
<v Speaker 1>on that committee, and if they fail, then Senator Lamas

0:34:15.200 --> 0:34:17.480
<v Speaker 1>and I will certainly take it up. Senator Lamas. You

0:34:17.520 --> 0:34:21.000
<v Speaker 1>did talk earlier this week about the volume of calls

0:34:21.040 --> 0:34:23.319
<v Speaker 1>your office has gotten on gun violence and sort of

0:34:23.360 --> 0:34:26.399
<v Speaker 1>signaled you know that you were giving this additional consideration.

0:34:26.440 --> 0:34:29.920
<v Speaker 1>And I'm wondering where you stand on this new bipartisan

0:34:30.000 --> 0:34:33.640
<v Speaker 1>legislation now, just you know where's your head at. Well,

0:34:33.680 --> 0:34:36.560
<v Speaker 1>I haven't seen the legislation. The calls that I were

0:34:36.640 --> 0:34:40.239
<v Speaker 1>getting from people who want us to do something, we're

0:34:40.280 --> 0:34:43.000
<v Speaker 1>not specific about what they want us to do. They

0:34:43.040 --> 0:34:46.400
<v Speaker 1>just said it's time to do something. The calls I

0:34:46.520 --> 0:34:51.920
<v Speaker 1>was getting from people who are opposed to doing something

0:34:52.160 --> 0:34:56.399
<v Speaker 1>are specific to guns, because my state of Wyoming has

0:34:56.440 --> 0:34:59.480
<v Speaker 1>a strong gun culture. So for me, I'm going to

0:34:59.560 --> 0:35:04.120
<v Speaker 1>be looking at issues like juvenile expungement of records for

0:35:04.280 --> 0:35:07.799
<v Speaker 1>violent juvenile offenses, and I'm going to be looking at

0:35:08.000 --> 0:35:12.120
<v Speaker 1>mental health solutions. Um. I'm worried that there are going

0:35:12.160 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 1>to be a lot of um young people coming out

0:35:16.560 --> 0:35:19.520
<v Speaker 1>of the COVID lockdowns that spent a lot of time

0:35:20.480 --> 0:35:28.520
<v Speaker 1>on the internet viewing harmful websites that may trigger them

0:35:28.560 --> 0:35:33.120
<v Speaker 1>to be UM violent or act out in ways that

0:35:33.520 --> 0:35:36.799
<v Speaker 1>probably they would not have before we went into the lockdowns.

0:35:37.080 --> 0:35:38.960
<v Speaker 1>So those are the kind of things that worry me

0:35:39.080 --> 0:35:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the most. Those are the things that keep me out

0:35:41.120 --> 0:35:46.279
<v Speaker 1>at night. Senators cars and Jilly Brown and Synthi alumnus there.

0:35:46.320 --> 0:35:51.760
<v Speaker 1>You can catch that full interview at Bloomberg dot com.

0:35:51.760 --> 0:35:54.239
<v Speaker 1>The Biden administration is taking new steps to shore up

0:35:54.360 --> 0:35:57.720
<v Speaker 1>US cyber defenses in light of Russia's ongoing war on Ukraine.

0:35:57.840 --> 0:36:00.360
<v Speaker 1>The biggest cyber threats the hot topic of the weeks

0:36:00.680 --> 0:36:03.040
<v Speaker 1>r s a conference happening right now in San Francisco.

0:36:03.160 --> 0:36:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Crowd Strikes CEO and co founder George Kurtz was just

0:36:05.480 --> 0:36:08.239
<v Speaker 1>there and joins me now here in the studio. So

0:36:08.280 --> 0:36:12.919
<v Speaker 1>what strikes you as different about this conference than years past. Well,

0:36:13.000 --> 0:36:15.960
<v Speaker 1>certainly we're in person, which I think both vendors and

0:36:16.040 --> 0:36:18.399
<v Speaker 1>customers were really excited about. I think there's a really

0:36:18.440 --> 0:36:21.480
<v Speaker 1>strong interest in security. Um It's something that I've talked

0:36:21.480 --> 0:36:23.560
<v Speaker 1>about for a while. Even if we go into a

0:36:23.600 --> 0:36:27.200
<v Speaker 1>difficult macro background, security is still going to be a

0:36:27.200 --> 0:36:30.799
<v Speaker 1>top priority for boards and a top budgeted item UH

0:36:30.920 --> 0:36:33.799
<v Speaker 1>to keep companies safe. So it's encouraging. Obviously we're in

0:36:33.840 --> 0:36:36.800
<v Speaker 1>that industry, but we're also focused on helping customers and

0:36:36.840 --> 0:36:39.720
<v Speaker 1>consolidate their spen and I think that's been a big focus.

0:36:39.760 --> 0:36:42.920
<v Speaker 1>How do you consolidate spend in an area like security. Now,

0:36:43.000 --> 0:36:45.600
<v Speaker 1>they've been conflicting reports on the actual state of the

0:36:45.600 --> 0:36:49.400
<v Speaker 1>cyber threat landscape. For example, cyber ransomware attacks. Are they

0:36:49.480 --> 0:36:52.200
<v Speaker 1>up or are they down? Well, some of the dollar

0:36:52.239 --> 0:36:54.759
<v Speaker 1>amounts are down, and I think there's two reasons for that.

0:36:54.800 --> 0:36:57.600
<v Speaker 1>You've seen some movement in bitcoin right as it's as

0:36:57.600 --> 0:37:00.440
<v Speaker 1>it's crashed, and when you calculate all the sits down

0:37:00.480 --> 0:37:03.319
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. But the other pieces, um. When you

0:37:03.360 --> 0:37:06.400
<v Speaker 1>think about Ukraine and Russia and some of the cyber

0:37:06.600 --> 0:37:08.759
<v Speaker 1>crime e crime groups they used to coordinate. Now there's

0:37:08.760 --> 0:37:10.520
<v Speaker 1>not a lot of coordination between the groups, and some

0:37:10.560 --> 0:37:14.279
<v Speaker 1>of the groups have actually splintered and uh and fractured off.

0:37:14.360 --> 0:37:18.160
<v Speaker 1>So overall it's still a really robust e crime market.

0:37:18.320 --> 0:37:21.680
<v Speaker 1>Ransomware is one of the top threats of the day

0:37:21.920 --> 0:37:24.800
<v Speaker 1>and people are still paying big dollars for it. President

0:37:24.840 --> 0:37:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Biden have warned about these retaliatory potential cyber attacks from Russia,

0:37:29.400 --> 0:37:32.279
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't seem like that has happened yet, has it.

0:37:33.120 --> 0:37:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Are we missing something? Well? I think what's important to

0:37:35.560 --> 0:37:38.760
<v Speaker 1>realize that Russia continually has access to lots of systems

0:37:38.760 --> 0:37:42.360
<v Speaker 1>around the globe. They're very capable um cyber adversary. But

0:37:42.400 --> 0:37:44.400
<v Speaker 1>it hasn't happened yet, right, I mean, it hasn't been

0:37:44.400 --> 0:37:46.799
<v Speaker 1>as bad as certainly the president well you know, and

0:37:46.840 --> 0:37:48.560
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what I'm trying to say. They have

0:37:48.600 --> 0:37:51.440
<v Speaker 1>access in lots of places, and once you start to

0:37:51.480 --> 0:37:55.200
<v Speaker 1>destroy things, then your access tends to get figured out right.

0:37:55.280 --> 0:37:57.680
<v Speaker 1>And what people have to realize that in in cyber

0:37:57.760 --> 0:38:00.160
<v Speaker 1>wards a one time you sweapon if if something it's

0:38:00.200 --> 0:38:02.880
<v Speaker 1>destructive is used, you can use it one time. The

0:38:02.920 --> 0:38:06.680
<v Speaker 1>other piece that's interesting, and it's a broader question, is

0:38:06.800 --> 0:38:10.319
<v Speaker 1>what a cyber attack, a destructive one, now constitute an

0:38:10.320 --> 0:38:13.040
<v Speaker 1>act of war? And I think just given the changing

0:38:13.040 --> 0:38:18.640
<v Speaker 1>geopolitical landscapes, it's unclear. There's also been criticisms about Biden's

0:38:18.719 --> 0:38:23.840
<v Speaker 1>approach to cybersecurity, you know, pushing more responsibility on private companies.

0:38:23.920 --> 0:38:26.239
<v Speaker 1>Kirsten Todd of SISA was also at r s A.

0:38:26.440 --> 0:38:28.440
<v Speaker 1>She was here on the show. Take a listen to

0:38:28.520 --> 0:38:32.360
<v Speaker 1>what she had to say. When we're talking about ransomware.

0:38:32.400 --> 0:38:34.759
<v Speaker 1>I think the challenge with this issue is that we've

0:38:34.800 --> 0:38:37.680
<v Speaker 1>created kind of a perverse structure. We in the United

0:38:37.719 --> 0:38:41.640
<v Speaker 1>States have actually created a market, a very thriving, strong

0:38:41.880 --> 0:38:45.280
<v Speaker 1>market in ransomware, where we now have companies that charge,

0:38:45.320 --> 0:38:48.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, six figures to go on retainer to negotiate

0:38:48.239 --> 0:38:52.960
<v Speaker 1>ransom to get information about malicious actors. What do you

0:38:53.000 --> 0:38:55.360
<v Speaker 1>make of that? Did we create our own problems? I

0:38:55.400 --> 0:38:58.319
<v Speaker 1>don't know. We created our own problems obviously when you

0:38:58.360 --> 0:39:01.400
<v Speaker 1>look at the amount of money that can be gained

0:39:01.440 --> 0:39:04.160
<v Speaker 1>from encrypting a system, I think the bad guys have

0:39:04.200 --> 0:39:07.120
<v Speaker 1>figured out that if you can make a three on

0:39:07.120 --> 0:39:09.080
<v Speaker 1>one system, you can make a lot more by taking

0:39:09.080 --> 0:39:11.719
<v Speaker 1>out an entire company. And it's just a function of

0:39:11.760 --> 0:39:15.759
<v Speaker 1>the complexity of the technology environment and the fact that

0:39:15.920 --> 0:39:19.160
<v Speaker 1>from a regulatory or maybe from a legal framework perspective,

0:39:19.160 --> 0:39:22.520
<v Speaker 1>it's very difficult to bring these thread actors to justice

0:39:22.560 --> 0:39:24.400
<v Speaker 1>because they're all over the place and a lot of

0:39:24.400 --> 0:39:26.200
<v Speaker 1>times you can't get to them. So there's big dollars

0:39:26.239 --> 0:39:28.279
<v Speaker 1>to be made in those areas. Speaking of dollars, crowd

0:39:28.360 --> 0:39:31.200
<v Speaker 1>strike share price has dropped significantly with the rest of

0:39:31.200 --> 0:39:35.239
<v Speaker 1>the market. What should investors be looking for over the

0:39:35.280 --> 0:39:37.319
<v Speaker 1>over the next six months and what do you have

0:39:37.360 --> 0:39:42.000
<v Speaker 1>to say to to folks who are maybe skeptical well,

0:39:42.000 --> 0:39:43.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean I can't forecast the market, but when you

0:39:43.800 --> 0:39:45.560
<v Speaker 1>look at our key one earnings and what we were

0:39:45.560 --> 0:39:49.399
<v Speaker 1>able to uh to display UM and we talked about

0:39:49.440 --> 0:39:52.480
<v Speaker 1>that last week. You look at the growth rate annual

0:39:52.520 --> 0:39:55.720
<v Speaker 1>recurring revenue almost two billion dollars in annual recurring revenue,

0:39:56.160 --> 0:39:59.400
<v Speaker 1>and that's combined an incredible growth rate at scale with

0:39:59.520 --> 0:40:02.840
<v Speaker 1>cash f generation, which is what investors are looking forty

0:40:03.480 --> 0:40:06.440
<v Speaker 1>free cash flow generation hundred fifty seven point five million

0:40:06.680 --> 0:40:09.320
<v Speaker 1>for the quarter. We think that's the right recipe and

0:40:09.400 --> 0:40:12.319
<v Speaker 1>that's what we're focused on executing and keeping our customers safe.

0:40:12.360 --> 0:40:15.120
<v Speaker 1>There are so many more cybersecurity companies that this year's

0:40:15.200 --> 0:40:17.479
<v Speaker 1>RSA than there were even last year, because so many

0:40:17.480 --> 0:40:20.960
<v Speaker 1>new companies have been funded. Are they all going to survive?

0:40:21.040 --> 0:40:24.359
<v Speaker 1>Are you worried about the future of some of these companies? Well,

0:40:24.440 --> 0:40:28.560
<v Speaker 1>I think security is a complicated landscape and not every company,

0:40:29.080 --> 0:40:32.160
<v Speaker 1>even ours, can handle everything in the security landscape in

0:40:32.239 --> 0:40:35.319
<v Speaker 1>terms of UM specific areas. That being said, a lot

0:40:35.320 --> 0:40:37.759
<v Speaker 1>of companies at r s A are features right, They're

0:40:37.760 --> 0:40:40.160
<v Speaker 1>not true companies or true platform companies, and a lot

0:40:40.160 --> 0:40:41.759
<v Speaker 1>of them won't be public. And when we think about

0:40:41.800 --> 0:40:44.400
<v Speaker 1>what's happening today. The public markets are locked up, so

0:40:44.480 --> 0:40:47.759
<v Speaker 1>you have a lot of private companies with high valuations

0:40:47.800 --> 0:40:49.839
<v Speaker 1>that don't really have an exit at this point. And

0:40:49.920 --> 0:40:52.319
<v Speaker 1>when you think about the public market valuations going down,

0:40:52.360 --> 0:40:55.520
<v Speaker 1>that's going to bleed off into the private markets. We've

0:40:55.560 --> 0:40:57.760
<v Speaker 1>seen layoffs at some of these companies, and in fact,

0:40:57.840 --> 0:40:59.960
<v Speaker 1>we think it's gonna be an opportunity for better hiring

0:41:00.160 --> 0:41:03.160
<v Speaker 1>because of just this lock up in the I p.

0:41:03.280 --> 0:41:05.640
<v Speaker 1>O market, And the second area is in the M

0:41:05.640 --> 0:41:07.160
<v Speaker 1>and A front. We think there's gonna be some great

0:41:07.160 --> 0:41:10.319
<v Speaker 1>opportunities out there in the future. Interesting crowd checks. CEO

0:41:10.400 --> 0:41:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and co founder George Kurt's good to see you in

0:41:12.120 --> 0:41:14.240
<v Speaker 1>here in person for the first time in a couple

0:41:14.280 --> 0:41:17.920
<v Speaker 1>of years. Thank you for stopping by. And that does

0:41:17.960 --> 0:41:20.200
<v Speaker 1>it for this edition of Bloomberg Technology. We're gonna be

0:41:20.200 --> 0:41:23.879
<v Speaker 1>back Tomorrow's got cutlerro Stockics will be with us. We'll

0:41:23.880 --> 0:41:26.680
<v Speaker 1>talk about that legal battle with Nike and a new

0:41:26.680 --> 0:41:29.920
<v Speaker 1>report about the rise of counterfeit luxury