WEBVTT - No Más? No, Moss!

0:00:00.240 --> 0:00:06.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of iHeartRadio. Time

0:00:06.440 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>now for Fantasy Football Weekly from iHeartRadio, your weekly.

0:00:11.119 --> 0:00:14.720
<v Speaker 2>Source for the nation's best fantasy speculation and advice.

0:00:15.400 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 1>Now along with the guys.

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:19.480
<v Speaker 3>From Guillotine Leagues dot com.

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:20.440
<v Speaker 4>Here's your host.

0:00:22.600 --> 0:00:25.320
<v Speaker 1>It's Fantasy Football Weekly. I am Paul Charchi and co

0:00:25.440 --> 0:00:30.280
<v Speaker 1>hosts today are Scott Fish and Brian Johnson. Hey guys, Hey,

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:31.040
<v Speaker 1>how's it going.

0:00:31.160 --> 0:00:31.720
<v Speaker 5>How's it going?

0:00:32.600 --> 0:00:36.760
<v Speaker 1>No, Colin mccochney, No, no, no, In fact, all.

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:39.319
<v Speaker 4>Right, I'll stay then I'll stick around it is.

0:00:39.479 --> 0:00:43.839
<v Speaker 2>It is sad to report his his emergency issues at

0:00:43.840 --> 0:00:45.280
<v Speaker 2>Mayo Clinic last week did.

0:00:45.159 --> 0:00:47.559
<v Speaker 1>Not go well. No on life support.

0:00:47.760 --> 0:00:50.639
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, sounds like Cony not gonna make it.

0:00:50.920 --> 0:00:55.920
<v Speaker 1>We're considering it GoFundMe for Colin mccockney due to the

0:00:55.960 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 1>staggering medical bills that he's he's heard while here. We're

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:02.400
<v Speaker 1>got plenty to go get do it.

0:01:02.400 --> 0:01:03.680
<v Speaker 5>We'll definitely get to it.

0:01:03.920 --> 0:01:07.319
<v Speaker 1>Yes, for sure, We've got a London game. We'll call

0:01:07.400 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 1>and do it from bedside. Now find out absolutely not.

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:13.200
<v Speaker 1>We'll give you nine players upon whom you can take

0:01:13.240 --> 0:01:15.720
<v Speaker 1>a chance. We'll answer three tough questions we'll give you

0:01:15.800 --> 0:01:20.560
<v Speaker 1>premature speculation. Players will break down every game Fantasy Football

0:01:20.600 --> 0:01:25.399
<v Speaker 1>Weekly style with letter grades on every meaningful player, and

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 1>we're going to answer the really difficult questions surrounding the

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Indianapolis running game with Zach Moss and Jonathan Taylor excited

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:36.319
<v Speaker 1>to dive into that. Let's get right into the matchups,

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 1>beginning with the Lions taking on the Buccaneers. Scott Lions

0:01:40.880 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 1>offense has been really fantastic Later good No, Jamir Gibbs, Nope.

0:01:45.040 --> 0:01:49.520
<v Speaker 1>I view David Montgomery as a top five fantasy running

0:01:49.560 --> 0:01:50.639
<v Speaker 1>back at this moment.

0:01:50.800 --> 0:01:52.240
<v Speaker 5>Yes, I completely agree.

0:01:52.320 --> 0:01:54.320
<v Speaker 2>The way they're using him, the way they want to

0:01:54.400 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 2>use him, he's bordering on automatic. A each week's territory

0:01:59.640 --> 0:02:02.960
<v Speaker 2>is really what it is. His giant workload of twenty

0:02:03.000 --> 0:02:05.360
<v Speaker 2>three point two five touches per game.

0:02:06.240 --> 0:02:07.080
<v Speaker 5>You gotta love that.

0:02:07.160 --> 0:02:10.640
<v Speaker 2>It's mostly carries, that's for sure, and backs have not

0:02:10.840 --> 0:02:13.360
<v Speaker 2>done well against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers their opponent for

0:02:13.520 --> 0:02:16.680
<v Speaker 2>this week. But outside of that Eagle and because outside

0:02:16.720 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 2>of that Eagles game, no running back has had more

0:02:19.120 --> 0:02:19.919
<v Speaker 2>than eleven carries.

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:20.840
<v Speaker 5>That's really what it is.

0:02:21.240 --> 0:02:24.519
<v Speaker 2>The Eagles are the one team that truly went after

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:27.120
<v Speaker 2>the ground game against them, and they did that to

0:02:27.160 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 2>the tune of thirty carries for one hundred and seventy

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:32.280
<v Speaker 2>three yards. So if you stick to the run game,

0:02:32.320 --> 0:02:34.519
<v Speaker 2>it seems like they're beatable on the ground. I did

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 2>give Montgomery an A grade in this one. Over to

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:40.880
<v Speaker 2>the passing game, Jared Goff's getting a B grade. Now

0:02:40.919 --> 0:02:43.359
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna I'm gonna preface this with this matchup. The

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:48.720
<v Speaker 2>Bucks currently rank top I believe top seven or eight

0:02:48.919 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 2>in almost in just top twelve, definitely in a bunch

0:02:51.800 --> 0:02:54.919
<v Speaker 2>of defensive categories, but top seven or eight against every

0:02:54.960 --> 0:02:57.960
<v Speaker 2>single position quarterback, running back, wide receiver, or to end,

0:02:58.000 --> 0:03:01.080
<v Speaker 2>tight end. So it's not the best defensive matchup, not

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:03.800
<v Speaker 2>the best matchup for this offense. But I believe in

0:03:03.840 --> 0:03:08.320
<v Speaker 2>Ben Johnson snapping balls between quarterbacks, legs to the running

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:11.440
<v Speaker 2>back and doing trick plays. I believe in Ben Johnson

0:03:11.440 --> 0:03:18.800
<v Speaker 2>and this Lion's offense. Bucks sixpence defensive DVOA DVOA. Only

0:03:18.880 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 2>one three hundred yard day for Jared Goff. In fact,

0:03:21.520 --> 0:03:24.600
<v Speaker 2>his highest is two hundred and fifty three yards outside

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:27.880
<v Speaker 2>of that one day and only two multi score games,

0:03:28.320 --> 0:03:30.920
<v Speaker 2>but he's safely been a two hundred and thirty plus

0:03:31.040 --> 0:03:34.880
<v Speaker 2>and a score guy, which is sea level B or

0:03:34.920 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 2>sea level you know, depending on what you.

0:03:36.880 --> 0:03:39.320
<v Speaker 1>Have, you go see the downso see the downside. And

0:03:39.360 --> 0:03:41.920
<v Speaker 1>golf is just Montgomery eats so many touchdowns.

0:03:41.760 --> 0:03:42.960
<v Speaker 5>It is it is.

0:03:43.400 --> 0:03:45.560
<v Speaker 2>I do have a bee here just because there's so

0:03:45.680 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 2>many opportunities for this lion's offense to score. So I

0:03:48.960 --> 0:03:50.760
<v Speaker 2>gave him. I gave him the upside of a B

0:03:50.920 --> 0:03:55.080
<v Speaker 2>grade on this one. I'm on ros Saint Brow practice

0:03:55.120 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 2>fully on Friday. We fully expect him to go.

0:03:57.520 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 4>Now.

0:03:58.080 --> 0:04:01.200
<v Speaker 2>Cards are third toughest against the slot. But honestly, it's

0:04:01.240 --> 0:04:03.880
<v Speaker 2>a Moanra. All but one lead receiver has went for

0:04:03.880 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 2>one hundred plus on the Bucks full practices. Amra's a

0:04:07.880 --> 0:04:11.160
<v Speaker 2>nine catch a game eighty two plus yards coin flip

0:04:11.200 --> 0:04:11.760
<v Speaker 2>of a score.

0:04:12.040 --> 0:04:13.040
<v Speaker 5>That's an A grade for me.

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:14.920
<v Speaker 1>What do you think of Josh Reynolds. I think is

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:16.240
<v Speaker 1>a much trickier decision.

0:04:16.640 --> 0:04:19.719
<v Speaker 2>I actually have a C grade on him because Laporta

0:04:19.960 --> 0:04:22.840
<v Speaker 2>has been not practicing. He went through walkthrough on Friday,

0:04:22.839 --> 0:04:27.120
<v Speaker 2>but not practicing with that sea with that, with that injury,

0:04:27.640 --> 0:04:30.159
<v Speaker 2>I believe that he might be a little limited.

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:32.000
<v Speaker 5>Sounds like he's gonna be good to go.

0:04:32.080 --> 0:04:34.400
<v Speaker 2>But if it, if it flares up, he might Josh

0:04:34.440 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 2>Reynolds might see extra work. Second wide receivers have topped

0:04:38.000 --> 0:04:41.280
<v Speaker 2>fifty yards in every game and scored in all but one.

0:04:41.520 --> 0:04:44.840
<v Speaker 2>Wow against this Tampa Bay team. Josh Reynolds, maybe he

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 2>is a conservative grain for if you look at Josh Reynolds,

0:04:48.120 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 2>He's had sixty six plus yards in four of the

0:04:50.680 --> 0:04:53.960
<v Speaker 2>five games. He's had three to five catches in each

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 2>of the games. Nine to twelve points is Sea territory.

0:04:57.560 --> 0:05:00.960
<v Speaker 2>You do want the score though, So on him, I

0:05:01.000 --> 0:05:03.360
<v Speaker 2>believe I said I mentioned Laporta.

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 5>You know he's kind of questionable.

0:05:04.600 --> 0:05:07.039
<v Speaker 2>He's an auto A. If he starts, he's a top

0:05:07.080 --> 0:05:09.159
<v Speaker 2>five tight end. If he doesn't go, he doesn't go.

0:05:09.240 --> 0:05:11.800
<v Speaker 2>But if you're starting Tom, if he goes over to

0:05:11.839 --> 0:05:15.400
<v Speaker 2>the other side, the buck side. Baker Mayfield, I got

0:05:15.440 --> 0:05:18.080
<v Speaker 2>a C grade on him. Lion's third best in d

0:05:18.920 --> 0:05:22.000
<v Speaker 2>defensive d v O A lines of However, lines have

0:05:22.000 --> 0:05:26.560
<v Speaker 2>allowed multiple scores to every QB they faced. Not named Desmond, right,

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:30.240
<v Speaker 2>So that's pretty good Baker.

0:05:30.279 --> 0:05:32.920
<v Speaker 1>We had down. Look, we get plenty of things wrong. Yeah,

0:05:32.960 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 1>we we identified Baker Mayfield and this early schedule really early.

0:05:38.960 --> 0:05:40.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, in the preseason, we're like this, he's got

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:44.160
<v Speaker 1>this run of games or he's gonna have really positive opportunities.

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:44.360
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:46.799
<v Speaker 2>And one thing that I didn't target before the season,

0:05:46.839 --> 0:05:49.360
<v Speaker 2>but I really should have should have was their OC

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:52.960
<v Speaker 2>Dave Canalis made Gino Smith really something last year and

0:05:53.080 --> 0:05:57.440
<v Speaker 2>he left and now Gino's Baker's having having some having

0:05:57.520 --> 0:06:00.160
<v Speaker 2>kind of a heyday. By the way, those four corequarter

0:06:00.200 --> 0:06:03.120
<v Speaker 2>backs that the Bucks of you know, the the Bucks

0:06:03.120 --> 0:06:05.360
<v Speaker 2>have faced, also all got two hundred and forty five

0:06:05.400 --> 0:06:07.920
<v Speaker 2>plus yards. So if you're if you're pegging in two

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 2>hundred and forty five yards and a score or two

0:06:10.080 --> 0:06:13.480
<v Speaker 2>for Baker Mayfield, we're talking Sea territory, maybe b if

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:16.320
<v Speaker 2>if he can. But he's only got one more one

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:18.800
<v Speaker 2>multi score game, so let's give him a see there.

0:06:19.120 --> 0:06:21.800
<v Speaker 2>Mike Evans and Chris Godwin, I'm giving them both sees.

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:26.040
<v Speaker 2>It's kind of kind of frustrating that the first three

0:06:26.080 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 2>weeks Mike Evans was the better one. He plays Marshawn Latimore.

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:34.719
<v Speaker 2>In week four, Chris Godwin has the better week. They

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:37.880
<v Speaker 2>both have, you know, a little bit of tougher matchups.

0:06:37.880 --> 0:06:40.719
<v Speaker 2>Camp South Camp, Sutton allows a ninety five passer rating

0:06:40.760 --> 0:06:45.000
<v Speaker 2>against fifty four percent completion against. That's going to be

0:06:45.080 --> 0:06:47.120
<v Speaker 2>up against Mike Evans. Chris Godwin's going to get the

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:52.679
<v Speaker 2>easier matchup against Jerry Jacobs, allowing a lot easier. I think, Yeah,

0:06:52.720 --> 0:06:54.880
<v Speaker 2>so I have c grades on them both. If I

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:57.200
<v Speaker 2>had to bet against one or bet for one, it

0:06:57.200 --> 0:07:00.000
<v Speaker 2>would be Mike Evans, who in the non Marshall lane

0:07:00.200 --> 0:07:05.080
<v Speaker 2>more games, had the better scores. A sneaky, sneaky, sneaky

0:07:05.120 --> 0:07:07.080
<v Speaker 2>dart throw that I can't give a starting grade to.

0:07:08.000 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 2>I just can't do it is Trey Pomer. He's only

0:07:11.520 --> 0:07:13.640
<v Speaker 2>got one to two catches a game, but he's going

0:07:13.680 --> 0:07:16.080
<v Speaker 2>in the slot where he's gonna get Will Harris, who's

0:07:16.120 --> 0:07:19.480
<v Speaker 2>allowing nearly a half a fantasy point per route run,

0:07:19.840 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 2>a one eighteen passer rating against an eighty seven percent

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 2>completion percentage against. And he's allowing thirteen yards per attempt

0:07:29.480 --> 0:07:33.280
<v Speaker 2>against thirteen yards per attempt against a slot corner.

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 5>Like, that's a lot.

0:07:34.440 --> 0:07:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Of yards per Palmer run from the slot that much.

0:07:36.840 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think of Godwin as being more of

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:39.480
<v Speaker 1>the slot guy.

0:07:39.600 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, he's he's actually moved outside quite a bit. I

0:07:42.280 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 2>could get I could get the I need it.

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:44.840
<v Speaker 1>Right this second.

0:07:45.440 --> 0:07:46.520
<v Speaker 5>You don't need it right this U.

0:07:47.360 --> 0:07:49.640
<v Speaker 1>But I am interested in attacking the slot against the

0:07:49.680 --> 0:07:52.880
<v Speaker 1>Bucks or against the Lions rather with Chauncey Gardner Johnson out.

0:07:53.400 --> 0:07:55.680
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, so I was going to try to I think

0:07:55.760 --> 0:07:56.120
<v Speaker 5>for shot.

0:07:56.160 --> 0:07:58.200
<v Speaker 1>White is probably the last guy of note.

0:07:58.000 --> 0:08:01.640
<v Speaker 2>Right yeah, way, just the last guy of note. I

0:08:01.680 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 2>was going to try to grab that. Uh Rashad White

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 2>I actually have.

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:06.559
<v Speaker 5>On the bench.

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:08.960
<v Speaker 2>I guess he could be a dart throw because he's

0:08:08.960 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 2>getting eighteen nineteen touches a game. But man, it took

0:08:12.480 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 2>Ken Walker seventeen carries just to hit forty three yards.

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:16.880
<v Speaker 3>White.

0:08:17.040 --> 0:08:19.880
<v Speaker 2>What he's doing with this nineteen touches is super inefficient.

0:08:20.960 --> 0:08:28.480
<v Speaker 2>He's topped eleven Fantasy points just once. No touchdowns, no touchdowns. Yeah, yeah,

0:08:28.520 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 2>absolutely so it's it's.

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:33.880
<v Speaker 1>Just defense is turning into a beast.

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 2>You could you could give him. You could give him

0:08:37.160 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 2>the volume seed. By the way, Trey Palmer fifty five

0:08:39.400 --> 0:08:40.280
<v Speaker 2>percent from the slot.

0:08:40.360 --> 0:08:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Okay, thank you.

0:08:41.559 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, you could give him the volume seed.

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:45.880
<v Speaker 2>But I have him on the bench forced fourth worst

0:08:46.000 --> 0:08:49.160
<v Speaker 2>rushing yards over expected for rush White this year.

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:51.559
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the Seahawks taking on the Bengals. Brian

0:08:51.600 --> 0:08:54.680
<v Speaker 1>for the Seahawks side Kenneth Walker, the aforementioned Kenneth Walker

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:57.679
<v Speaker 1>has just turned into an automatic start at this point.

0:08:57.480 --> 0:09:00.760
<v Speaker 6>He's more than that, he's getting the fan to see Fonsie.

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:08.240
<v Speaker 6>The Bengals own the highest opponent rushing yard percentage at

0:09:08.240 --> 0:09:11.080
<v Speaker 6>forty four percent, meaning that nearly half of their opponent's

0:09:11.160 --> 0:09:13.120
<v Speaker 6>total yards have come on the ground. That's a great

0:09:13.200 --> 0:09:16.920
<v Speaker 6>ratio for running backs since he also allowing one hundred

0:09:16.920 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 6>and seven rushing yards per game to running backs that

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:22.120
<v Speaker 6>is fifth most. And when we last saw the Seahawks

0:09:22.120 --> 0:09:23.960
<v Speaker 6>in Week four, if they're coming off their bye in

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:27.559
<v Speaker 6>week five, they had one healthy starting offensive lineman, they

0:09:27.600 --> 0:09:31.120
<v Speaker 6>expect all their starters back for this game. And despite

0:09:31.160 --> 0:09:33.839
<v Speaker 6>having that bye week already, Walker has tied for third

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 6>among running backs with five rushing touchdowns, also fifth in

0:09:37.880 --> 0:09:41.439
<v Speaker 6>red zone carries, just one fewer than Isaiah Pacheco, who

0:09:41.440 --> 0:09:43.960
<v Speaker 6>has played six games and Walker has played four. So

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 6>the Fonsie for Kenneth Zach Charvina on the bench gets

0:09:47.800 --> 0:09:51.000
<v Speaker 6>clearly clearly taken a back seat in that backfield over

0:09:51.040 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 6>the wide receivers DK Metcalf and Tyler Lockett both get

0:09:54.240 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 6>a C. I don't like the passing game nearly as

0:09:57.120 --> 0:09:59.120
<v Speaker 6>much as the ground game for Seattle in this one.

0:09:59.520 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 6>The Bengal are allowing just ten catches and one hundred

0:10:02.160 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 6>and forty yards per game to wide receivers as a whole.

0:10:05.760 --> 0:10:07.880
<v Speaker 6>That is not good when it comes to Metcalf and

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:11.520
<v Speaker 6>Lockett's prospects. But since he has surrendered surrendered a wide

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:14.199
<v Speaker 6>receiver touchdown in four straight games, so they are both

0:10:14.640 --> 0:10:19.400
<v Speaker 6>still startable. Jackson Smith and Jigba not startable. Has yet

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:21.240
<v Speaker 6>to top thirty five yards. He is on the bench,

0:10:21.320 --> 0:10:24.640
<v Speaker 6>as are all the tight ends for Seattle. He just

0:10:24.679 --> 0:10:27.640
<v Speaker 6>can't trust any of them. Lastly, for Seattle, Gino Smith,

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:30.240
<v Speaker 6>I'll give him the see. Not the best match up here.

0:10:30.280 --> 0:10:32.880
<v Speaker 6>The Bengals are allowing two hundred and thirteen passing yards

0:10:32.880 --> 0:10:36.120
<v Speaker 6>and one point four passing touchdowns per game, so the

0:10:36.160 --> 0:10:39.400
<v Speaker 6>touchdowns aren't too bad. That's why we'll start Gino still,

0:10:39.440 --> 0:10:42.679
<v Speaker 6>but just barely. It's really all about Walker in this

0:10:42.760 --> 0:10:45.960
<v Speaker 6>game over the Bengals side, starting with Joe Mixon going

0:10:46.000 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 6>to give him a see. Mixon is playing seventy five

0:10:48.760 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 6>percent of the snaps for the Bengals, which is great.

0:10:51.280 --> 0:10:53.080
<v Speaker 6>He's getting a ton of volume, but he's not doing

0:10:53.160 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 6>much with it, mixingan excuse me mixin. Averaging less than

0:10:57.080 --> 0:11:01.560
<v Speaker 6>five yards per touch not good, just one total touchdown

0:11:01.600 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 6>all season.

0:11:02.400 --> 0:11:04.720
<v Speaker 2>His part of that is his up the middle like

0:11:04.840 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 2>runs up the middle rate is second worse than the NFL,

0:11:07.440 --> 0:11:09.720
<v Speaker 2>like something like sixty sixty five percent of his runs

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 2>are straight.

0:11:10.320 --> 0:11:12.559
<v Speaker 5>Up the middle. That's not gonna not mark it. That's

0:11:12.559 --> 0:11:13.160
<v Speaker 5>not gonna be good.

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:15.320
<v Speaker 6>And what else isn't working? When he gets the ball

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:18.800
<v Speaker 6>inside the ten yard line? Oh for ten carries inside

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:21.920
<v Speaker 6>a touchdown from inside the ten so brutal.

0:11:22.320 --> 0:11:23.920
<v Speaker 4>Just to see for mixing.

0:11:24.120 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 1>Has he scored this year?

0:11:25.000 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 6>I think he's got one one touchdown. It wasn't from

0:11:27.960 --> 0:11:29.840
<v Speaker 6>inside the ten yard line. I can tell you that much.

0:11:30.360 --> 0:11:33.200
<v Speaker 6>Who has scored more than once this year? Jamar Chase.

0:11:33.520 --> 0:11:36.559
<v Speaker 6>He gets an a last week was cathartic if you

0:11:36.679 --> 0:11:39.720
<v Speaker 6>drafted Jamar Chase, especially with the with the first overall pick,

0:11:39.760 --> 0:11:41.680
<v Speaker 6>which I did in a fair amount of leagues, you know,

0:11:41.760 --> 0:11:45.320
<v Speaker 6>bucking the trend and not daking Jefferson. Very solid matchup

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:49.280
<v Speaker 6>for Chase here as the Seahawks are allowing nineteen catches

0:11:49.320 --> 0:11:52.920
<v Speaker 6>and two hundred and twenty yards per game to wide receivers,

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 6>and they have surrendered five touchdowns the position over their

0:11:55.840 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 6>last three games alone. So love Chase obviously, with an

0:11:59.840 --> 0:12:05.080
<v Speaker 6>A A. T. Higgins trending towards playing with the rib injury,

0:12:05.120 --> 0:12:07.319
<v Speaker 6>if he does, I will give him the sea. We've

0:12:07.320 --> 0:12:10.520
<v Speaker 6>seen Higgins play when he's been on the fence and

0:12:10.520 --> 0:12:12.560
<v Speaker 6>then leave that right. That was more of like a

0:12:12.559 --> 0:12:14.960
<v Speaker 6>lower body injury. So if he plays, I'll give him

0:12:15.000 --> 0:12:15.280
<v Speaker 6>the sea.

0:12:15.720 --> 0:12:16.000
<v Speaker 3>I saw.

0:12:16.040 --> 0:12:17.920
<v Speaker 1>I heard he's Scott. If he's gonna play, he has

0:12:18.000 --> 0:12:22.240
<v Speaker 1>to take some kind of mid chest injection if it's

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:25.040
<v Speaker 1>a pain killer, if he's gonna try to play through it,

0:12:25.080 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 1>which sounds like awful, like wedging a needle between the

0:12:28.320 --> 0:12:29.040
<v Speaker 1>ribs or something.

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:30.600
<v Speaker 4>That's what they do when you get rabies.

0:12:30.720 --> 0:12:33.079
<v Speaker 2>I think this kind of stuff is the fantasy killer

0:12:33.200 --> 0:12:36.240
<v Speaker 2>Higgins when he's suiting up and not scoring, but he's

0:12:36.320 --> 0:12:37.520
<v Speaker 2>in so you want to start him.

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:39.640
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm out on Higgins. T.

0:12:39.720 --> 0:12:40.439
<v Speaker 4>Higgins is a dog.

0:12:40.480 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 5>Though he's a dog, he's.

0:12:41.880 --> 0:12:42.840
<v Speaker 4>Got that dog in him.

0:12:43.080 --> 0:12:45.160
<v Speaker 6>I'm gonna I'm gonna throw a segar at Tyler Boyd

0:12:45.280 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 6>either way, regardless of whether Higgins plays or not. Again,

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:52.040
<v Speaker 6>the Seahawks giving up a good production to opposing wide

0:12:52.040 --> 0:12:55.360
<v Speaker 6>receivers Irv Smith Junior. Though he is on the bench,

0:12:55.360 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 6>he wasn't even targeted last week when Joe Burrow threw

0:12:57.800 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 6>for three hundred plus yards. Tight ends are fools goal

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 6>the year in and year out. I will never draft

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:06.040
<v Speaker 6>one ever again. I promise you that I'm putting it

0:13:06.080 --> 0:13:09.000
<v Speaker 6>on Wax. And lastly, speaking of Joe Burrow, he gets

0:13:09.040 --> 0:13:12.120
<v Speaker 6>an a. The Seahawks on the eighth highest opponent completion

0:13:12.200 --> 0:13:16.280
<v Speaker 6>percentage and as a result, opposing quarterbacks are averaging three

0:13:16.400 --> 0:13:19.680
<v Speaker 6>hundred and five passing yards per game, and Burrow says,

0:13:19.720 --> 0:13:22.200
<v Speaker 6>the calf feels great. Hopefully that injury is behind him.

0:13:22.480 --> 0:13:24.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean look great last week. Let's hope that

0:13:24.440 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>that continues. We want the old Joe Burrow back, no

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:31.080
<v Speaker 1>doubt about it when we come back. Ravens taking on

0:13:31.160 --> 0:13:35.160
<v Speaker 1>the Titans Dereck Henry with a daunting matchup, coming off

0:13:35.200 --> 0:13:37.800
<v Speaker 1>a dud game. What do you do with him when

0:13:37.800 --> 0:14:10.080
<v Speaker 1>we come back? Fantasy Football Weekly, Take a chance on me.

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Nine players not normally in your starting lineup, but begin

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:17.720
<v Speaker 1>at the quarterback position. Scott Fish who you got yeah?

0:14:17.760 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 2>For the quarterback position this week, I have Matthew Stafford.

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 2>I know that he's like QB fifteen on the season,

0:14:25.520 --> 0:14:27.840
<v Speaker 2>but man, he's throwing the ball a ton. The Cards

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:31.320
<v Speaker 2>are the third worst in defensive DVOA. No team has

0:14:31.360 --> 0:14:34.000
<v Speaker 2>a lower pressure rate than the Arizona Cardinals that just

0:14:34.000 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 2>twenty five percent, So they're not gonna even get to him.

0:14:37.120 --> 0:14:39.520
<v Speaker 2>Finally had his first multi score game last week, and

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:42.520
<v Speaker 2>opposing quarterbacks are dropping two hundred and seventy four point

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 2>four yards and two point two touchdowns per game to

0:14:45.480 --> 0:14:50.520
<v Speaker 2>keep East, not to mention a seventy six percent completion percentage.

0:14:50.760 --> 0:14:52.880
<v Speaker 2>By the way, the Rams lead the league in plays

0:14:52.880 --> 0:14:54.760
<v Speaker 2>per game too, so there's a lot of opportunity.

0:14:54.800 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>We talked last week about getting out of Kyron Williams.

0:14:57.280 --> 0:15:00.000
<v Speaker 1>It's this feels like the time this thing's gonna start tilting.

0:15:00.080 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 1>He's got all those touchdowns, things are going.

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:02.560
<v Speaker 3>To start tilting.

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:04.040
<v Speaker 4>I wasn't on the show last.

0:15:03.920 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Week, clearly not let's go to it. Look you're still right, hey,

0:15:09.080 --> 0:15:11.520
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't change a great call. Don't give up on get,

0:15:11.680 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 1>but now's the time to sell hide. Let's go to

0:15:13.680 --> 0:15:15.680
<v Speaker 1>your your quarterback, take a chance on the quarterback.

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:17.680
<v Speaker 6>Broun Oh, you know I gotta go with a revenge

0:15:17.720 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 6>game and Gardner Minshew at Jacksonville. The Jaguars are very

0:15:21.960 --> 0:15:25.120
<v Speaker 6>much a pass funneling defense. Seventy six percent of their

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:27.520
<v Speaker 6>opponent's total yards have come through the air, that is

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:31.080
<v Speaker 6>third most. They are yielding a healthy thirty six pass

0:15:31.120 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 6>attempts per game, and Jacksonville also owns the seventh highest

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 6>allowed per yards allowed per pass attempt at seven point two.

0:15:39.720 --> 0:15:42.360
<v Speaker 6>That is a very healthy number. These teams met in

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 6>Week one the Colts and Jaguars, and Anthony Richardson started

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:48.400
<v Speaker 6>that game for Indy. He threw a respectable two hundred

0:15:48.400 --> 0:15:50.520
<v Speaker 6>and twenty three yards and a touchdown in his very

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 6>first game. Is a pro, but I expect Minshew to

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:56.760
<v Speaker 6>top those passing numbers. Three of the last four quarterbacks

0:15:56.760 --> 0:15:59.240
<v Speaker 6>to face the Jags have thrown for at least two

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 6>hundred and eighty yard cards and multiple touchdowns. The only

0:16:02.000 --> 0:16:05.040
<v Speaker 6>one who failed to reach those benchmarks Desmond Rinter. We

0:16:05.080 --> 0:16:06.040
<v Speaker 6>got to pick on him again.

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Josh Dobbs goes up against the Rams. He looks shockingly competent.

0:16:10.080 --> 0:16:13.200
<v Speaker 1>Back to back multiple touchdown games against San Francisco and

0:16:13.280 --> 0:16:16.760
<v Speaker 1>a good Cincinnati secondary. Rams defense not great. The rank

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:20.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty second in past rush win rate and thirty first

0:16:20.160 --> 0:16:22.600
<v Speaker 1>by Pro Football Focus and Coverage, and he's got some

0:16:22.640 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 1>sneaky value as a rusher as well. The Rams have

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:27.840
<v Speaker 1>been hammered by Jalen Hurts and Anthony Richardson over the

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 1>last two weeks on the ground, Scott, your take a

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:31.640
<v Speaker 1>chance on me, Runner?

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:34.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, this one made a little bit easier with the

0:16:34.480 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 2>news coming out Friday that Miles Sanders was not going

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 2>to suit up. Chuba Hubbard was already working in on

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 2>that split on Miles Sanders. He's the passing down back.

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:46.480
<v Speaker 2>He does a lot of long down and distant stuff.

0:16:47.560 --> 0:16:49.360
<v Speaker 2>He's going to get all the work this week in

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:52.280
<v Speaker 2>a game that they're going to be playing catch up

0:16:52.320 --> 0:16:52.840
<v Speaker 2>with Miami.

0:16:52.960 --> 0:16:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Brian, you take a chance on me, Runner.

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:57.520
<v Speaker 6>I got the Cowboys Rico Dudele at the charger as

0:16:57.600 --> 0:17:00.240
<v Speaker 6>Tony Pollard has been limited by a shoulder injury. So

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:02.200
<v Speaker 6>if you were to sit or leave this game early

0:17:02.320 --> 0:17:03.960
<v Speaker 6>doubt it would be in a smash spot.

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:05.080
<v Speaker 4>I expect Pollard to.

0:17:05.000 --> 0:17:07.680
<v Speaker 6>Play, but either way, there should be some meat left

0:17:07.680 --> 0:17:10.520
<v Speaker 6>on the bone for dowdle against a very soft run defense.

0:17:10.560 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 6>The Chargers are allowing one hundred and forty seven combo

0:17:12.840 --> 0:17:15.399
<v Speaker 6>yards per game to running backs, and despite having their

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:18.960
<v Speaker 6>bye week already, Las surrendered the seventh most perceptions to

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 6>the position.

0:17:20.440 --> 0:17:24.080
<v Speaker 1>Arizona running back of Mari de Mercado showed up in

0:17:24.119 --> 0:17:26.440
<v Speaker 1>a splashy way last week, and people are freaking out

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:28.920
<v Speaker 1>because Keante Ingram is listed on top of the Cardinals

0:17:28.920 --> 0:17:33.119
<v Speaker 1>depth chart. I say, who cares? He has been awful

0:17:33.400 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 1>in every opportunity he's had. Ingram as a career rushing

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:45.040
<v Speaker 1>average of one point seven yards per carry unfathomably bad. Meanwhile,

0:17:45.720 --> 0:17:48.920
<v Speaker 1>de Mercado, in his first ever meaningful work last week,

0:17:49.119 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 1>rolled up forty five yards, showed some wiggle, scored a touchdown,

0:17:52.359 --> 0:17:54.520
<v Speaker 1>and he can catch Rams are a middle of the

0:17:54.520 --> 0:17:57.920
<v Speaker 1>pack run defense. There's a nice opportunity for super de Marcado,

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:03.280
<v Speaker 1>super dam Makara. I like it for our Spanish speaking friends. Scott,

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:05.920
<v Speaker 1>your receiver, take a chance on me, receiver.

0:18:06.040 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 2>I'm going back to the Jacoby Myers well who has

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:10.960
<v Speaker 2>of this morning on sleeper has only fifty percent started

0:18:11.280 --> 0:18:14.280
<v Speaker 2>revenge game versus the New England Patriots currently only fifty

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:17.760
<v Speaker 2>percent started. As I mentioned, ten plus targets, seven plus

0:18:17.800 --> 0:18:22.199
<v Speaker 2>receptions in all Jimmy g starts, he'll see mostly JC Jackson,

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:24.800
<v Speaker 2>who was one of the worst quarterbacks last year. He

0:18:24.920 --> 0:18:28.919
<v Speaker 2>was even benched this year inactive healthy scratch against the Vikings,

0:18:29.320 --> 0:18:31.480
<v Speaker 2>got traded over New England and he's only.

0:18:31.240 --> 0:18:32.479
<v Speaker 5>Been there for a cup of coffee.

0:18:32.480 --> 0:18:34.679
<v Speaker 2>And now he's got to try to try to defend

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:38.680
<v Speaker 2>Jacoby Myers, who leads the NFL in targets inside the ten.

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:41.119
<v Speaker 1>If you want to know just how bad Bill Belichick

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 1>is as a general manager, he let Jacoby Myers walk

0:18:45.000 --> 0:18:47.920
<v Speaker 1>so he can sign Juju Smith Schuster to the same deal.

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:49.200
<v Speaker 5>Who won't play in this game.

0:18:49.359 --> 0:18:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Oh, anyway, Brian, you take a chance on me receiver.

0:18:54.960 --> 0:18:57.000
<v Speaker 4>I'm sticking with the Cowboys. Up the Chargers.

0:18:57.000 --> 0:18:59.679
<v Speaker 6>I got Michael Gallup, finally a great matchup for the

0:18:59.680 --> 0:19:02.359
<v Speaker 6>Cowboy offense, especially their wide receivers.

0:19:02.440 --> 0:19:03.320
<v Speaker 4>The Chargers are.

0:19:03.160 --> 0:19:06.480
<v Speaker 6>Allowing fifteen catches, two hundred and thirty two yards, and

0:19:06.560 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 6>one point five touchdowns per game to opposing wideouts. Over

0:19:10.560 --> 0:19:13.440
<v Speaker 6>the last three weeks, Gallup has seen eighteen targets, while

0:19:13.480 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 6>Brandon Cooks has drawn fifteen looks. During that span, Gallup

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:20.280
<v Speaker 6>has total thirteen catches for one hundred and sixty seven yards.

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:24.119
<v Speaker 6>Cooks just seven catches for forty eight yards. He's not

0:19:24.280 --> 0:19:26.360
<v Speaker 6>looking too good. Cooks that news.

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:28.439
<v Speaker 4>Cooks looking cooked.

0:19:28.840 --> 0:19:29.119
<v Speaker 1>Thank you.

0:19:30.200 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 4>I got right itself there.

0:19:32.000 --> 0:19:34.680
<v Speaker 1>kJ Osbourn goes up against Chicago and now is a

0:19:34.840 --> 0:19:38.560
<v Speaker 1>lead role. He's going to take the Justin Jefferson routes.

0:19:38.560 --> 0:19:41.119
<v Speaker 1>According to head coach Kevin O'Connell's a pretty straight shooter.

0:19:41.680 --> 0:19:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Chicago's got an excellent cornerback Jalen Johnson, who's going to

0:19:44.240 --> 0:19:46.159
<v Speaker 1>return for this game, but I think he's going to

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:49.280
<v Speaker 1>be shadowing Jordan Addison expected to go in this one.

0:19:49.600 --> 0:19:52.439
<v Speaker 1>The rest of the Bear secondary very suspect, especially if

0:19:52.520 --> 0:19:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Eddie Jackson misses another game. Bears are allowing the ninth

0:19:55.560 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 1>most fantasy points to wide outs, and we've seen some

0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:01.959
<v Speaker 1>other slippery players like kJ Osbourne, Curtis Samuel Romeo Dobbs

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:05.080
<v Speaker 1>have success against Chicago and when he runs out of

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 1>the slot, he's got a fantastic matchup against Greg Stroman,

0:20:09.600 --> 0:20:15.159
<v Speaker 1>the sausage King Chicago. Let's go to Ravens taking on

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the Titans. I want to start with the running game

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:20.680
<v Speaker 1>where we're putting both Justice Hill and Gus Edwards on

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the bench. Hill and Gus roughly even in snaps and

0:20:25.480 --> 0:20:28.000
<v Speaker 1>touches over the past two weeks, with just waters down

0:20:28.040 --> 0:20:32.480
<v Speaker 1>their efficiency. Zack Moss randomly destroyed the Titans last week,

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:35.640
<v Speaker 1>but that's way outside the norm. Prior to Moss last week,

0:20:35.720 --> 0:20:39.680
<v Speaker 1>no back had top sixty seven yards in twenty one

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:45.280
<v Speaker 1>straight games against Tennessee. Non Zack Moss, runners have averaged

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:48.679
<v Speaker 1>only three point one yards per carry, and Tennessee ranks

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:51.600
<v Speaker 1>third and tackling by Pro Football Focus. So we're gonna

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:54.320
<v Speaker 1>bench both Hill and Edwards from the Ravens. Let's go

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 1>to the passing game. Eight drops last week by the

0:20:58.600 --> 0:21:02.920
<v Speaker 1>Ravens receivers eight including two sure fire touchdowns that were

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:06.840
<v Speaker 1>taken away from Lamar Jackson as he goes up against Tennessee. Now,

0:21:06.840 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee looks like their past evens has been better lately,

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:13.159
<v Speaker 1>but they goosegged a gimpy Joe Burrow and Gardner Minshew

0:21:13.200 --> 0:21:16.359
<v Speaker 1>the past two weeks. The previous three quarterbacks to face

0:21:16.400 --> 0:21:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Tennessee averaged three hundred yards and two scores, and that

0:21:21.040 --> 0:21:23.280
<v Speaker 1>would be the upside for Jackson here who's throwing more

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 1>downfield last two games nine yards per pass attempt. I

0:21:26.359 --> 0:21:29.400
<v Speaker 1>like that. Tennessee's been very good at stopping quarterbacks via

0:21:29.440 --> 0:21:32.639
<v Speaker 1>the ground, though last week in a short look, Anthony

0:21:32.720 --> 0:21:36.120
<v Speaker 1>Richardson only had five yards. Last year, Jonathan Allen Josh

0:21:36.160 --> 0:21:39.199
<v Speaker 1>Allen ran for ten yards, Jalen Hurts ran for twelve yards.

0:21:39.720 --> 0:21:41.680
<v Speaker 1>So I can only get to a B grade here

0:21:41.680 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>for Lamar Jackson, but I do like him as a

0:21:43.560 --> 0:21:47.240
<v Speaker 1>solid starter. Mark Andrews coming off the game with three drops,

0:21:47.280 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 1>including an easy touchdown. On the season, he leads all

0:21:50.320 --> 0:21:55.000
<v Speaker 1>tight ends and drops and drop percentage. Titans have not

0:21:55.080 --> 0:21:57.320
<v Speaker 1>allowed a tight end score, but they've also faced a

0:21:57.359 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of bottom tier tight ends. So far, eighty percent

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:03.040
<v Speaker 1>of the targets two tight ends have been completed against

0:22:03.040 --> 0:22:04.800
<v Speaker 1>the Titans. So we're coming in with a B grade

0:22:04.840 --> 0:22:07.240
<v Speaker 1>on Mark Andrews and a hopeful bounce back game off

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>of last week's brutal endeavor. Zay Flowers dropped a touchdown

0:22:11.080 --> 0:22:13.600
<v Speaker 1>last week as well. He's the team's leader in routes

0:22:13.640 --> 0:22:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and his ten plus targets in three of five games.

0:22:16.280 --> 0:22:19.399
<v Speaker 1>Titans allowing the third most receptions and the seventh most

0:22:19.440 --> 0:22:23.719
<v Speaker 1>receiving yards per game to wide receivers. Flowers runs from

0:22:23.760 --> 0:22:26.240
<v Speaker 1>all over the field, but it's got a particularly juicy

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:32.520
<v Speaker 1>matchup against cornerback Christian Fulton, who's PFF's sixth worst graded cornerback.

0:22:33.480 --> 0:22:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's go over to the Titan side. There's only two

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:38.520
<v Speaker 1>players you care about. We begin with King Henry. He

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:42.840
<v Speaker 1>smoked these Ravens last year, piling up in one game

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 1>one hundred and thirty three yards in a score. But

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:48.359
<v Speaker 1>the good news for Derek Henry this week ends right there.

0:22:49.000 --> 0:22:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore hasn't allowed a rushing touchdown. They haven't. They've given

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:57.880
<v Speaker 1>up two rushing touchdowns in their last fourteen games. Four

0:22:58.000 --> 0:23:01.399
<v Speaker 1>or five opposing lead runners have failed to top fifty

0:23:01.520 --> 0:23:04.800
<v Speaker 1>nine yards, and Baltimore ranked seventh and tackling by Pro

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Football Focus and seventh in run defense by Pro Football Focus.

0:23:08.760 --> 0:23:13.320
<v Speaker 1>Two of King Henry's last three games straight up duds.

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:14.840
<v Speaker 5>Taj Spears league winner.

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:17.359
<v Speaker 1>He could be a league winner down the road. We

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:20.040
<v Speaker 1>keep talking about it, but you can't start Tase Spier,

0:23:20.160 --> 0:23:22.520
<v Speaker 1>by the way. See granted, Tarrick Henry, he's just not

0:23:22.560 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 1>getting enough touches. You get five rushes and three catches

0:23:25.280 --> 0:23:30.880
<v Speaker 1>that's not enough for Taj Spears. Maybe a prayer dart

0:23:30.920 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 1>throw just on sheer talent for Taj Spears, who we love.

0:23:34.720 --> 0:23:36.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the passing game. The only guy you'd

0:23:36.480 --> 0:23:39.959
<v Speaker 1>consider starting in a tough matchup is DeAndre Hopkins. Finally

0:23:40.000 --> 0:23:43.399
<v Speaker 1>had the breakout game last week, as suggested by this

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:46.879
<v Speaker 1>very show, but I do not like him here. Tannehill's

0:23:46.920 --> 0:23:50.040
<v Speaker 1>been mostly ineffective. The Ravens secondary's gotten healthier with the

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:53.040
<v Speaker 1>return of Marlon Humphrey, although he got lit up by

0:23:53.040 --> 0:23:56.080
<v Speaker 1>this similarly physical George Pickens in his debut last week.

0:23:56.800 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 1>So I'll note that Baltimore allows the third fewest yards

0:23:59.840 --> 0:24:03.560
<v Speaker 1>per reception to wide out and that Pickings touchdown last

0:24:03.560 --> 0:24:06.160
<v Speaker 1>week was the only touchdown they've allowed to wide receivers

0:24:06.200 --> 0:24:07.960
<v Speaker 1>all year. So they can only get you to a

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:10.159
<v Speaker 1>c great and DeAndre Hopkins and the rest of them

0:24:10.200 --> 0:24:12.240
<v Speaker 1>are on the bench. And the only other guy for

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:15.520
<v Speaker 1>the Titans you might consider Chaga Konkuo. And you got

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:17.280
<v Speaker 1>to pick your spots for Jig And this is not it.

0:24:17.320 --> 0:24:20.280
<v Speaker 1>Baltimore is a fantastic tight end defense. They haven't allowed

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 1>a tight end touchdown in ten straight games. That's it.

0:24:24.920 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 1>For that matchup, Brian, I don't think you can do

0:24:28.560 --> 0:24:31.280
<v Speaker 1>forty nine Ers Browns in less than three minutes.

0:24:31.600 --> 0:24:32.639
<v Speaker 4>You want to bet? Can you?

0:24:32.880 --> 0:24:33.199
<v Speaker 3>All right?

0:24:33.280 --> 0:24:35.639
<v Speaker 1>Then go all right, thank you, Ken, Let's do it.

0:24:35.960 --> 0:24:38.480
<v Speaker 6>This is an ugly look, ugly looking game over under.

0:24:38.480 --> 0:24:40.600
<v Speaker 6>It just thirty six point five points, and I think

0:24:40.640 --> 0:24:43.160
<v Speaker 6>all those points were implied for the San Francisco side.

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:45.200
<v Speaker 4>Christian McCaffrey not.

0:24:45.119 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 6>Gonna say I'm easy A and give him an A here.

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:49.440
<v Speaker 6>It's a tough matchup against the Browns, but with Cleveland

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:52.160
<v Speaker 6>turning to PJ Walker, a quarterback, the forty nine Ers

0:24:52.400 --> 0:24:55.280
<v Speaker 6>should dominate time of possession here, So I'm gonna stick

0:24:55.320 --> 0:24:59.200
<v Speaker 6>with the A for McCaffrey, Brandon, I can Deebo Samuel

0:24:59.320 --> 0:25:01.840
<v Speaker 6>just a see for these guys. A brutal matchup on

0:25:01.920 --> 0:25:05.160
<v Speaker 6>paper for IUK and Samuel. The Browns are allowing seven

0:25:05.240 --> 0:25:08.920
<v Speaker 6>catches at ninety one yards per game to wide receivers

0:25:08.920 --> 0:25:11.640
<v Speaker 6>with just one touchdown all season, and I just fear

0:25:11.680 --> 0:25:13.400
<v Speaker 6>the forty nine Ers pump the brakes when it comes

0:25:13.440 --> 0:25:14.440
<v Speaker 6>to passing in this game.

0:25:14.600 --> 0:25:15.919
<v Speaker 4>They're not really gonna need to throw.

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:18.199
<v Speaker 6>It a ton, So just a C for IUK and

0:25:18.280 --> 0:25:21.520
<v Speaker 6>Samuel also a C for George Kittle coming off the

0:25:21.560 --> 0:25:24.679
<v Speaker 6>hat trick. Tight Ends do fair the best when it

0:25:24.680 --> 0:25:27.720
<v Speaker 6>comes to skill players against the Browns. Mark Andrews burned

0:25:27.760 --> 0:25:30.359
<v Speaker 6>Cleveland in Week four with five catches for eighty yards

0:25:30.359 --> 0:25:33.240
<v Speaker 6>and two touchdowns. But again, I don't think the forty

0:25:33.320 --> 0:25:34.760
<v Speaker 6>nine ers are going to throw it a ton, and

0:25:34.800 --> 0:25:37.560
<v Speaker 6>that is why Brock Perdy also gets a See the

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:41.800
<v Speaker 6>Browns own the lowest opponent completion percentage at fifty four percent.

0:25:43.440 --> 0:25:45.280
<v Speaker 6>The Niners should not throw a lot in this one,

0:25:45.280 --> 0:25:48.480
<v Speaker 6>but two touchdowns for Perdy is possible, so he gets

0:25:48.520 --> 0:25:51.879
<v Speaker 6>the sea and over the Cleveland side. I just have

0:25:51.920 --> 0:25:54.560
<v Speaker 6>a starting great on Jerome Ford with a C, probably

0:25:54.640 --> 0:25:57.800
<v Speaker 6>because you have to based on volume. He should remain

0:25:57.840 --> 0:26:00.880
<v Speaker 6>the lean lead back that is Ford, that is over

0:26:00.960 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 6>Kareem Hunt.

0:26:01.520 --> 0:26:03.240
<v Speaker 4>But this is a bad matchup.

0:26:03.720 --> 0:26:07.200
<v Speaker 6>Opposing backs or averaging under eighteen touches per game for

0:26:07.400 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 6>just seventy seven combo yards against San Francisco and you're

0:26:10.760 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 6>benching the passing game. Ari Cooper, Elijah Moore, Dovin Peoples

0:26:15.040 --> 0:26:19.400
<v Speaker 6>Jones twenty thirteen, Josh Gordon two thousand and seven, Brailn.

0:26:19.160 --> 0:26:22.960
<v Speaker 5>Edwards, Hotel beckup oh, everyone.

0:26:22.520 --> 0:26:23.880
<v Speaker 4>On the bench with PJ.

0:26:24.000 --> 0:26:26.920
<v Speaker 6>Walker quarterback, including David and Joku. Of course it's gonna

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:29.800
<v Speaker 6>be an ugly game for Cleveland Josh Crimp speaking of.

0:26:29.760 --> 0:26:34.800
<v Speaker 1>The Buckley Browns, David and Choku's face, good, lord man, Glad,

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:35.399
<v Speaker 1>he's okay.

0:26:35.600 --> 0:26:36.920
<v Speaker 5>How did a toaster do that?

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:38.080
<v Speaker 3>I feel a.

0:26:37.960 --> 0:26:40.760
<v Speaker 1>Pair was I tweeted toaster? Turned out it was fire pit.

0:26:40.920 --> 0:26:43.240
<v Speaker 5>Okay, so that was wrong about I saw your tweeted.

0:26:43.480 --> 0:26:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I was still I was, dude, holy cow, Like I said, Glad,

0:26:47.520 --> 0:26:47.880
<v Speaker 1>he's okay.

0:26:48.119 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 3>If you haven't, you have.

0:26:48.800 --> 0:26:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Tried to Guillotine league. New leagues forming now today, right now,

0:26:52.760 --> 0:26:56.800
<v Speaker 1>as you're listening new leagues, Guillotine leagues dot Com your

0:26:56.840 --> 0:26:59.600
<v Speaker 1>opportunity to play in the freshest new way to play

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:03.399
<v Speaker 1>fantasy football every week, so much fun as the lowest

0:27:03.680 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 1>scoring team gets chopped and everybody else built superstar rosters

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:10.800
<v Speaker 1>like you. We'll be back with more Fantasy Football weekly

0:27:11.119 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 1>after this. Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly, Paul Charchie and

0:27:26.240 --> 0:27:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Scott Fish and Brian Johnson. You can follow us on

0:27:29.119 --> 0:27:32.439
<v Speaker 1>the site formerly known as Twitter at Scott Fish twenty

0:27:32.440 --> 0:27:36.040
<v Speaker 1>four Got it at BTXJ for Brian and I am

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:38.760
<v Speaker 1>at Paul Charcion Panthers take on the Dolphin.

0:27:38.800 --> 0:27:39.080
<v Speaker 4>Scott.

0:27:39.119 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 1>The Panthers offense has not looked great, and I've already

0:27:42.240 --> 0:27:45.199
<v Speaker 1>talked about Cuba Hubbard take a chance on me. But

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:48.119
<v Speaker 1>let's turn our attention to a passing game that last

0:27:48.160 --> 0:27:52.200
<v Speaker 1>week put up some solid garbage time opportunities and should

0:27:52.240 --> 0:27:55.400
<v Speaker 1>have a similar situation exactly exactly.

0:27:55.440 --> 0:27:58.640
<v Speaker 2>Opposing quarterbacks are throwing for an average of two hundred

0:27:58.640 --> 0:28:01.159
<v Speaker 2>and fifty eight yards and one point five scores against

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:03.920
<v Speaker 2>the Dolphins, A lot of that in ketchup mode, which

0:28:03.920 --> 0:28:06.840
<v Speaker 2>should be the game script this week. Bryce Bryce Young

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:09.680
<v Speaker 2>hasn't toped two hundred and fifty yards yet, but last week,

0:28:09.800 --> 0:28:12.119
<v Speaker 2>in that similar game script against the Lions, where they

0:28:12.119 --> 0:28:14.360
<v Speaker 2>were down bag they were playing catch up garbage time,

0:28:14.760 --> 0:28:16.879
<v Speaker 2>he went for two hundred and forty seven yards and

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:21.360
<v Speaker 2>three touchdowns. I expect somewhat similar, maybe not three touchdowns again,

0:28:21.600 --> 0:28:25.080
<v Speaker 2>will see yeah, but I expect something similar here. So

0:28:25.160 --> 0:28:26.960
<v Speaker 2>I do have a C grade on Bryce Young. I

0:28:26.960 --> 0:28:29.400
<v Speaker 2>think he gets there with the ketchup garbage time.

0:28:29.480 --> 0:28:29.840
<v Speaker 1>Agreed.

0:28:30.200 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 5>I have an A.

0:28:31.119 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 2>Grade on Adam Thielen, and we maybe we very much disagree.

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:37.679
<v Speaker 2>You're ranked you're ranking him too low. This week, I

0:28:37.720 --> 0:28:39.280
<v Speaker 2>looked at your ranks and I'm like, that is way

0:28:39.320 --> 0:28:39.760
<v Speaker 2>too low.

0:28:40.200 --> 0:28:40.680
<v Speaker 5>I have him.

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:41.560
<v Speaker 1>I will look at my ranking.

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 2>I have him as a top twelve wide receiver this

0:28:44.400 --> 0:28:47.280
<v Speaker 2>week Thelm's THELAN is lining up in the slot sixty

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:49.840
<v Speaker 2>three percent of the time. He's getting thirty eight percent

0:28:49.840 --> 0:28:52.200
<v Speaker 2>of the red zone targets, thirty four percent of the

0:28:52.280 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 2>first read targets. So when Bryce Young drops back to

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:57.360
<v Speaker 2>pass a third of the time, he's looking and throwing

0:28:57.440 --> 0:29:00.880
<v Speaker 2>to THELAN twenty six percent target share, twenty nine percent

0:29:00.920 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 2>are yards. I don't need to go on. He's getting

0:29:03.080 --> 0:29:06.040
<v Speaker 2>all the work. Five plays of twenty plus yards. He's

0:29:06.080 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 2>also going to see second year slot corner Cater k

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:13.240
<v Speaker 2>Who who's allowing a one hundred and thirty five point

0:29:13.240 --> 0:29:17.640
<v Speaker 2>two passer rated against and a seventy one percent completion

0:29:17.880 --> 0:29:22.800
<v Speaker 2>against seven plus receptions in four straight For Adam Thielen.

0:29:22.720 --> 0:29:25.200
<v Speaker 1>He's been great everything that we hoped he could be

0:29:25.240 --> 0:29:28.400
<v Speaker 1>in the preseason when this show wit contrary to basically

0:29:28.440 --> 0:29:31.480
<v Speaker 1>every show in America. Yeah, yeah, on feeling.

0:29:31.240 --> 0:29:33.560
<v Speaker 2>Honestly, if his ad out was more than seven in

0:29:33.600 --> 0:29:35.600
<v Speaker 2>his yards after the catch was more than four HUD

0:29:35.800 --> 0:29:38.240
<v Speaker 2>right up there with the top top wide receivers.

0:29:38.440 --> 0:29:40.120
<v Speaker 5>The amount of volume he's getting.

0:29:39.840 --> 0:29:41.640
<v Speaker 1>You've convinced me and I've moved him up my rank.

0:29:41.680 --> 0:29:42.320
<v Speaker 5>There you go.

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:45.760
<v Speaker 2>I have DJ Shark on the bench. He's playing consistently

0:29:45.840 --> 0:29:47.720
<v Speaker 2>ninety percent of the snaps, but he's only got a

0:29:47.800 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 2>twelve percent target share. He's only seen two to four

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:54.360
<v Speaker 2>catches per game. The fifteen plus eight hot helps average

0:29:54.400 --> 0:29:56.520
<v Speaker 2>depth of target, so when he when he gets the ball,

0:29:56.600 --> 0:30:00.400
<v Speaker 2>it's it's deeper. But man, he needs this gord to

0:30:00.400 --> 0:30:03.800
<v Speaker 2>be pre productive, and I can't count on that. Jonathan Mango,

0:30:04.400 --> 0:30:06.360
<v Speaker 2>I'm giving a C grade here. I think it's a

0:30:06.400 --> 0:30:09.640
<v Speaker 2>sneaky spot for him. Five for forty eight on seven

0:30:09.640 --> 0:30:12.640
<v Speaker 2>targets last week in catch up mode. Similar spot here

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:15.960
<v Speaker 2>against the Dolphins. In his three full games, he's only

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:18.680
<v Speaker 2>played three full games. He's missed a game unlimited a

0:30:18.680 --> 0:30:23.000
<v Speaker 2>game eighty seven percent, ninety eight percent and eighty six

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:25.360
<v Speaker 2>percent of snaps. He's on the field a ton twenty

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:28.760
<v Speaker 2>eight percent of air yards in those game games, twenty

0:30:28.800 --> 0:30:32.760
<v Speaker 2>percent on third and fourth down, which is awesome. Also,

0:30:32.960 --> 0:30:36.000
<v Speaker 2>he's getting Eliappole instead of Xavian Howard, who's gonna be

0:30:36.040 --> 0:30:39.360
<v Speaker 2>on Chark shutting that down, So C grade on Jonathan Mingo.

0:30:39.920 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Over to the other side, the Miami Dolphins. How much

0:30:42.600 --> 0:30:44.600
<v Speaker 2>do I need to talk about to a Tyrek and

0:30:44.640 --> 0:30:47.480
<v Speaker 2>Waddle because I think they're automatic A's absolutely like Wattle,

0:30:47.520 --> 0:30:49.800
<v Speaker 2>I have ranked a little lower, but I still think

0:30:49.800 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 2>it's on Maca. No one's benching him. So I'm gonna

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:54.360
<v Speaker 2>go over to Raheem Mostard, who.

0:30:54.160 --> 0:30:58.000
<v Speaker 1>Also should be an automatic gay honestly, particularly now that

0:30:58.480 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 1>divon A chan Is is out on ir Yeah, and

0:31:02.000 --> 0:31:04.560
<v Speaker 1>it looks like Jeff Wilson looks like Jeff Wilson won't go,

0:31:04.720 --> 0:31:08.240
<v Speaker 1>so yeah, absolutely, Salvin achmed, Yes.

0:31:08.120 --> 0:31:10.440
<v Speaker 5>I'm gonna mention with Mostard here.

0:31:10.760 --> 0:31:14.520
<v Speaker 2>Lead backs not named Tony Jones Junior have all gone

0:31:14.560 --> 0:31:18.480
<v Speaker 2>for ninety plus yards against the Panthers, and even Tony

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:19.960
<v Speaker 2>Jones Junior scored twice.

0:31:20.240 --> 0:31:22.320
<v Speaker 5>Like he didn't get the yards, but he scored twice.

0:31:22.920 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 2>No team has allowed more touchdowns to running backs than

0:31:26.280 --> 0:31:31.360
<v Speaker 2>the Panthers, where he mostered also seven touchdowns rushing A grade.

0:31:31.360 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 2>They're converted four of five inside the five. By the way,

0:31:34.600 --> 0:31:37.360
<v Speaker 2>I know you love your inside the five to that

0:31:37.400 --> 0:31:39.520
<v Speaker 2>eighty percent is nice. But I have a C grade

0:31:39.520 --> 0:31:44.360
<v Speaker 2>on Salvin Achmed. Assuming Jeff Wilson does not go, there

0:31:44.400 --> 0:31:47.280
<v Speaker 2>just should be enough. Once again, the Panthers have allowed

0:31:47.320 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 2>the most rushing touch or much most touchdowns are running back.

0:31:50.080 --> 0:31:52.600
<v Speaker 2>Miami has scored the most. They are running the ball

0:31:52.680 --> 0:31:55.280
<v Speaker 2>in a lot UH this game. If it gets out

0:31:55.280 --> 0:31:58.920
<v Speaker 2>of hand, they're thirteen and a half favorites. Solvin Achmed

0:31:59.000 --> 0:32:01.160
<v Speaker 2>could get the mop up duty. I have a C

0:32:01.360 --> 0:32:02.080
<v Speaker 2>grade on him.

0:32:02.680 --> 0:32:04.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm with you on that. I think he's a sneaky play.

0:32:04.920 --> 0:32:06.920
<v Speaker 2>I thought about a take on for him, and I

0:32:07.520 --> 0:32:10.400
<v Speaker 2>was debating those two all week, but Jeff Wilson muddied

0:32:10.440 --> 0:32:11.000
<v Speaker 2>it too long.

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:12.680
<v Speaker 4>Command Wilson's doubtful.

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:12.960
<v Speaker 3>He's not.

0:32:13.080 --> 0:32:13.240
<v Speaker 4>He's not.

0:32:13.280 --> 0:32:15.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think. I don't think. We don't think he's

0:32:15.080 --> 0:32:18.480
<v Speaker 1>He was fun Friday. We don't think he's gonna go uh.

0:32:18.720 --> 0:32:22.080
<v Speaker 1>Commanders take on the Falcons. I'm gonna start with Brian Robinson,

0:32:22.080 --> 0:32:25.920
<v Speaker 1>who broke our hearts last week with a stone cold

0:32:26.040 --> 0:32:29.440
<v Speaker 1>dud against the Bears, and now he gets a brutal matchup.

0:32:29.760 --> 0:32:32.640
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta allows the fewest Fantasy points to running backs. That

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:36.160
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta defense is turning sneaky good. They're only one of

0:32:36.240 --> 0:32:40.040
<v Speaker 1>three teams that hasn't allowed a running back touchdown. Robinson

0:32:40.080 --> 0:32:42.000
<v Speaker 1>may be catching a little bit more than expected, but

0:32:42.360 --> 0:32:45.640
<v Speaker 1>the Falcons have alsoled the fewest receptions and yards to

0:32:45.760 --> 0:32:50.680
<v Speaker 1>running backs. Bench grade on Brian Wobinson in this one,

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 1>even with some volume presumably coming his way, just can't

0:32:54.680 --> 0:32:57.200
<v Speaker 1>do it. Let's go to the passing game. Curtis Samuel's

0:32:57.200 --> 0:32:59.600
<v Speaker 1>been a nice little story this year, shockingly involved in

0:32:59.720 --> 0:33:03.320
<v Speaker 1>eric enemy's offense, topping fifty one yards in four of

0:33:03.360 --> 0:33:06.040
<v Speaker 1>five games. I really like his individual matchup against de

0:33:06.200 --> 0:33:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Alford in the slot. He's allowed two touchdowns already and

0:33:09.480 --> 0:33:12.080
<v Speaker 1>an opposer passer rating of one hundred and ten. Slot

0:33:12.120 --> 0:33:15.000
<v Speaker 1>receivers Christian Kirk I'm on Ross Saint Brown posted very

0:33:15.000 --> 0:33:18.720
<v Speaker 1>strong games against Atlanta. Curtis Samuel c grade in this one.

0:33:18.880 --> 0:33:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Terry McLaurin also gets to see grade leads the team

0:33:21.360 --> 0:33:24.960
<v Speaker 1>in routes, targets, and receptions and yards. The problem is

0:33:25.160 --> 0:33:28.040
<v Speaker 1>the Enemy's offense is so diverse that nobody's really a

0:33:28.080 --> 0:33:32.720
<v Speaker 1>go to receiver, including Terry McLaurin. The Falcons underrated secondary

0:33:32.800 --> 0:33:36.200
<v Speaker 1>top six in yards and receptions to wide receivers, and

0:33:36.240 --> 0:33:39.440
<v Speaker 1>a very difficult individual matchup with cornerback aj Terrell.

0:33:39.840 --> 0:33:40.480
<v Speaker 5>He's been good.

0:33:40.480 --> 0:33:43.600
<v Speaker 1>He's been really good, allowing just a fifty nine percent

0:33:43.640 --> 0:33:46.880
<v Speaker 1>completion rate and only twenty five yards per game in

0:33:46.920 --> 0:33:49.440
<v Speaker 1>his coverage. I can only get Terry McLaurin to a

0:33:49.480 --> 0:33:54.280
<v Speaker 1>C grade. My Josh dottson, we were wrong, John Yeah, Johns.

0:33:54.440 --> 0:33:56.880
<v Speaker 1>Excuse me, John Dotson. You know we thought the breakout

0:33:56.920 --> 0:33:57.280
<v Speaker 1>was coming.

0:33:57.400 --> 0:33:59.560
<v Speaker 5>It's not well, that was offinished at the end of

0:33:59.600 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 5>the year.

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:03.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, very disappointing. Obviously a bench grade for

0:34:03.680 --> 0:34:05.240
<v Speaker 1>him until he proves to be a bigger part of

0:34:05.280 --> 0:34:06.200
<v Speaker 1>this passing offense.

0:34:06.240 --> 0:34:07.040
<v Speaker 5>What about.

0:34:09.120 --> 0:34:11.040
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna get there, all right, I guys got to

0:34:11.080 --> 0:34:15.000
<v Speaker 1>hit Logan Thomas first in three straight. In three straight weeks,

0:34:15.000 --> 0:34:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the Falcons have been rocked by tight ends Sam Laporta,

0:34:18.000 --> 0:34:21.280
<v Speaker 1>Evan Ingram, Dalton Scheltz. In four or five games, Atlanta's

0:34:21.320 --> 0:34:24.400
<v Speaker 1>yielded a touchdown and or fifty nine plus yards to

0:34:24.480 --> 0:34:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the Titan position. Thomas major part of the Commander's passing offense.

0:34:28.960 --> 0:34:31.200
<v Speaker 1>He averages thirty five routes per game and only one

0:34:31.280 --> 0:34:35.800
<v Speaker 1>fewer target per game than Terry McLaurin. B grade. Logan

0:34:35.880 --> 0:34:38.680
<v Speaker 1>Thomas still available in over half a fantasy league.

0:34:38.719 --> 0:34:41.040
<v Speaker 2>Well mostly because I dropped him in all of mine,

0:34:41.080 --> 0:34:41.799
<v Speaker 2>like a week and a half.

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:42.600
<v Speaker 1>That's already got hurt.

0:34:42.640 --> 0:34:44.600
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, well, it's a shame Scott was in that Fantasy

0:34:44.600 --> 0:34:47.880
<v Speaker 6>Football Weekly training camp when Logan Thomas was one of

0:34:47.880 --> 0:34:50.800
<v Speaker 6>my d nods. I like that, dudes, no one drafts

0:34:51.120 --> 0:34:51.640
<v Speaker 6>at the time.

0:34:51.760 --> 0:34:55.719
<v Speaker 1>It made sense. He has performed well. So I can

0:34:55.760 --> 0:34:59.960
<v Speaker 1>only get Sam Howell to a C grade and they

0:35:00.360 --> 0:35:03.720
<v Speaker 1>and I'm nervous about that, second only to Kirk Cousins

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:08.160
<v Speaker 1>and completions Sam Howell, who to guess that, and his

0:35:08.239 --> 0:35:10.600
<v Speaker 1>accuracy has been really good. He's got the fifth best

0:35:10.600 --> 0:35:15.680
<v Speaker 1>adjusted completion percentage. What's holding back Sam Howell's fantasy value

0:35:16.000 --> 0:35:20.480
<v Speaker 1>is these two things. A complete lack of depassing and

0:35:20.680 --> 0:35:25.319
<v Speaker 1>literally not one designed run this year for the very

0:35:25.360 --> 0:35:28.120
<v Speaker 1>mobile Sam Howell. These are the two things I was

0:35:28.280 --> 0:35:31.759
<v Speaker 1>counting on in the preseason to come together for Sam

0:35:31.800 --> 0:35:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Howell to be a regular fantasy contributor. So far, they're

0:35:35.680 --> 0:35:37.319
<v Speaker 1>not using him that way, and I can't get him

0:35:37.360 --> 0:35:39.719
<v Speaker 1>to higher than a C grade. In this matchup, Let's

0:35:39.760 --> 0:35:43.800
<v Speaker 1>go to Atlanta. Bijon Robinson obvious A grade. I believe.

0:35:43.920 --> 0:35:45.839
<v Speaker 1>I don't think I need to spend any more time

0:35:45.920 --> 0:35:47.319
<v Speaker 1>on Bijon Robinson other than.

0:35:47.239 --> 0:35:49.720
<v Speaker 5>The fact his mom calls said his name is Bajan.

0:35:49.920 --> 0:35:56.360
<v Speaker 1>Well, too bad. We are not going to even dignify that. Unfortunately,

0:35:57.480 --> 0:36:01.680
<v Speaker 1>there's there's an opportunity here for Well. I think we're

0:36:01.680 --> 0:36:03.759
<v Speaker 1>just gonna go obviously mb John Robinson and just move.

0:36:03.800 --> 0:36:06.760
<v Speaker 1>Ok okay good, Let's go to the passing game beginning

0:36:06.760 --> 0:36:12.480
<v Speaker 1>with this guy, Drake London. Mixed bag for Drake London.

0:36:12.480 --> 0:36:17.600
<v Speaker 1>In this game, Commanders have allowed the fourth most yards

0:36:17.640 --> 0:36:21.160
<v Speaker 1>and the most touchdowns to wide receivers and rookie cornerback

0:36:21.200 --> 0:36:23.040
<v Speaker 1>e Manuel Forbes. So they took in the first round

0:36:23.080 --> 0:36:26.560
<v Speaker 1>getting killed out there. He's allowed the second most yards

0:36:26.560 --> 0:36:31.560
<v Speaker 1>of any player and over twenty yards per reception. Drake

0:36:31.600 --> 0:36:34.800
<v Speaker 1>London could be a very sneaky start here. Volume is

0:36:34.800 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 1>always an issue with London. He ranks forty eighth in

0:36:37.320 --> 0:36:40.319
<v Speaker 1>targets and that worries me a little bit because you

0:36:40.360 --> 0:36:44.000
<v Speaker 1>can that's Arthur Smith, right, So for any other team

0:36:44.160 --> 0:36:46.919
<v Speaker 1>this would be an A grade opportunity, but I can't

0:36:46.960 --> 0:36:49.719
<v Speaker 1>do it with London because of Arthur Smith and the

0:36:49.719 --> 0:36:52.200
<v Speaker 1>potential that he's sitting on a four target game. So

0:36:52.360 --> 0:36:57.080
<v Speaker 1>just the B grade on Drake London. What about the

0:36:57.120 --> 0:37:01.920
<v Speaker 1>tight ends? John new Smith backup tight end, Kyle Pitts,

0:37:03.520 --> 0:37:07.440
<v Speaker 1>what about Van Jefferson and Jeff we're keeping We are

0:37:07.520 --> 0:37:10.040
<v Speaker 1>keeping John hu Smith and Kyle Pitts on the bench.

0:37:10.080 --> 0:37:12.120
<v Speaker 1>Oh boy, now, Johnny, I know what you're thinking, John,

0:37:12.160 --> 0:37:15.680
<v Speaker 1>Who's got more receptions, more yards. He's an amazing athlete.

0:37:15.719 --> 0:37:17.239
<v Speaker 1>I know that's what you're thinking right now.

0:37:17.320 --> 0:37:18.400
<v Speaker 5>That's exactly it.

0:37:18.440 --> 0:37:21.000
<v Speaker 1>But Washington's been very good against tight ends, allowing the

0:37:21.040 --> 0:37:24.640
<v Speaker 1>fourth fewest fantasy points. They put very capable tight ends

0:37:24.760 --> 0:37:28.359
<v Speaker 1>zach Ertz, Dawson, Knox, Dalton Kink, Dallas Goddard, all on

0:37:28.600 --> 0:37:31.759
<v Speaker 1>bad games, and only Cole Comet has found the tight

0:37:31.880 --> 0:37:35.680
<v Speaker 1>end front the end zone. The only tight end excuse me,

0:37:35.880 --> 0:37:38.720
<v Speaker 1>no tight end? His top forty two yards against Washington,

0:37:39.280 --> 0:37:42.160
<v Speaker 1>John Ojohnu and Kyle Pitts on the bench.

0:37:42.360 --> 0:37:45.320
<v Speaker 4>It's a good thing. Kyle Pitts actually plays wide receiver though.

0:37:46.239 --> 0:37:48.759
<v Speaker 1>So you say so, you say, all right, so where

0:37:48.760 --> 0:37:53.040
<v Speaker 1>does that leave us on our quarterback? Desmond Ritter, coming

0:37:53.080 --> 0:37:55.919
<v Speaker 1>off the best game of his career, his first three

0:37:56.000 --> 0:38:00.319
<v Speaker 1>hundred yard game, winning and this is a home game

0:38:00.320 --> 0:38:02.160
<v Speaker 1>and we and although the deal on his home road

0:38:02.160 --> 0:38:07.000
<v Speaker 1>splits pretty positive matchup, so maybe keeps the juice flowing here.

0:38:07.040 --> 0:38:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Only Josh Dobbs has failed to score multiple touchdowns against Washington,

0:38:11.239 --> 0:38:16.000
<v Speaker 1>including the Justin Fields explosion last week against Washington. For

0:38:16.040 --> 0:38:19.680
<v Speaker 1>all the talent to that Commander's defensive line, that looks

0:38:19.719 --> 0:38:21.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, with all the first rounders, man, they don't

0:38:21.640 --> 0:38:26.000
<v Speaker 1>do much. They ranked twenty sixth in pass rush win

0:38:26.239 --> 0:38:29.799
<v Speaker 1>rate for all those fourth all those first rounders, very

0:38:29.880 --> 0:38:34.760
<v Speaker 1>very weird. All right, let's move on Brian Colts taking

0:38:34.800 --> 0:38:37.560
<v Speaker 1>on the Jaguars Gardner Minshew at the helm. As you've

0:38:37.600 --> 0:38:38.600
<v Speaker 1>already mentioned.

0:38:38.800 --> 0:38:41.239
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, he's might take a chance on me quarterback, which

0:38:41.239 --> 0:38:44.120
<v Speaker 6>it generally equivocates to a CE, but I really have

0:38:44.239 --> 0:38:46.600
<v Speaker 6>a B grade on him. It's a pass funnel defense,

0:38:46.640 --> 0:38:50.160
<v Speaker 6>as I mentioned for the Jaguars, Minshew's former team. So

0:38:50.360 --> 0:38:53.240
<v Speaker 6>for that reason, Michael Pittman gets an A his last

0:38:53.239 --> 0:38:55.120
<v Speaker 6>three games. And by the way, these teams did play

0:38:55.160 --> 0:38:58.120
<v Speaker 6>in Week one, Jacksonville won thirty one to twenty one

0:38:58.160 --> 0:39:00.399
<v Speaker 6>in Indy, so we had some recent days to hear

0:39:00.880 --> 0:39:03.480
<v Speaker 6>Pittman's last three games against the Jags starting with that

0:39:03.520 --> 0:39:06.879
<v Speaker 6>Week one matchup this season, eight catches for ninety seven

0:39:06.960 --> 0:39:09.360
<v Speaker 6>yards and a touchdown, thirteen catches for one hundred and

0:39:09.360 --> 0:39:12.520
<v Speaker 6>thirty four yards, six catches for sixty four yards and

0:39:12.560 --> 0:39:15.239
<v Speaker 6>a touchdown, and the Jaguars are allowing more than one

0:39:15.360 --> 0:39:17.560
<v Speaker 6>hundred and eighty yards end a touchdown per game to

0:39:17.600 --> 0:39:20.680
<v Speaker 6>wide receivers. So Pittman again, a grade for him, and

0:39:20.760 --> 0:39:23.320
<v Speaker 6>watch out for rookie Josh Downs.

0:39:23.360 --> 0:39:24.680
<v Speaker 4>He gets a B. Yeah.

0:39:24.760 --> 0:39:27.480
<v Speaker 6>Downs has drawn a twenty four percent target share with

0:39:27.560 --> 0:39:31.839
<v Speaker 6>Minshew's quarterback. That's some B squad chemistry from preseason right there,

0:39:32.000 --> 0:39:33.200
<v Speaker 6>that spent a.

0:39:33.160 --> 0:39:33.960
<v Speaker 4>Lot of time together.

0:39:34.000 --> 0:39:37.040
<v Speaker 6>Got to love it Downs averaging seven targets and five

0:39:37.120 --> 0:39:39.759
<v Speaker 6>catches over his last three games. And I smell a

0:39:39.760 --> 0:39:44.320
<v Speaker 6>breakout game here on Sunday for the rookie. Not a breakout.

0:39:44.320 --> 0:39:45.719
<v Speaker 6>I don't know if he's ever going to break out ever.

0:39:45.840 --> 0:39:47.800
<v Speaker 6>And that's Alec Pierce. He is on the bench.

0:39:48.280 --> 0:39:48.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm done with him.

0:39:49.080 --> 0:39:51.680
<v Speaker 5>Catch totals field all the time he is.

0:39:51.760 --> 0:39:54.240
<v Speaker 1>He's on the field like ninety one percent of the plays.

0:39:54.560 --> 0:39:55.640
<v Speaker 1>They never thrown him ever.

0:39:55.800 --> 0:39:58.439
<v Speaker 2>By the way, Josh Downs, my prespect two weeks ago.

0:39:58.640 --> 0:39:59.560
<v Speaker 2>Hope you picked him up.

0:40:00.120 --> 0:40:00.359
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:40:00.440 --> 0:40:05.399
<v Speaker 6>Pierce catch totals one two, three, one one. He had

0:40:05.440 --> 0:40:08.360
<v Speaker 6>one catch five yards against Jacksonville in Week one.

0:40:08.120 --> 0:40:11.160
<v Speaker 1>I tried Josh Downs as they take a chance, I

0:40:11.160 --> 0:40:12.799
<v Speaker 1>mean guy like two three weeks ago.

0:40:12.880 --> 0:40:16.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I was yeah, he wasn't ready. He wasn't ready.

0:40:17.040 --> 0:40:18.000
<v Speaker 5>Not exactly right.

0:40:18.960 --> 0:40:21.919
<v Speaker 1>Sorry, it was out Pierce. I tried all Piers, I missed,

0:40:21.920 --> 0:40:22.760
<v Speaker 1>spoke well.

0:40:22.640 --> 0:40:25.840
<v Speaker 5>Josh Downs wasn't he's yeah.

0:40:25.200 --> 0:40:27.560
<v Speaker 4>And per usual we're off the Colts tight ends.

0:40:27.600 --> 0:40:31.720
<v Speaker 6>Way too much of a rotation there until until Jolyns

0:40:31.719 --> 0:40:32.600
<v Speaker 6>come back.

0:40:32.920 --> 0:40:33.160
<v Speaker 5>Thank you.

0:40:33.360 --> 0:40:33.520
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

0:40:33.560 --> 0:40:35.160
<v Speaker 4>And of course we have.

0:40:35.120 --> 0:40:37.680
<v Speaker 6>To talk about Zach Moss and Jonathan Taylor. We'll get

0:40:37.680 --> 0:40:40.840
<v Speaker 6>into this more later. Let' let's focus on the matchup.

0:40:41.760 --> 0:40:46.320
<v Speaker 6>Brutal matchup for both uh Taylor and Moss. Opposing running

0:40:46.320 --> 0:40:49.440
<v Speaker 6>backs were averaging just ninety two combo yards when facing

0:40:49.520 --> 0:40:52.840
<v Speaker 6>the Jaguars, who have surrendered just one total touchdown to

0:40:52.920 --> 0:40:56.480
<v Speaker 6>the position this season. Deon Jackson, Jake Funk, and Evan

0:40:56.560 --> 0:41:00.000
<v Speaker 6>Hole combined for fifty seven scoreless yards when these teams

0:41:00.200 --> 0:41:02.239
<v Speaker 6>in Week one. So I have just a c on

0:41:02.920 --> 0:41:05.120
<v Speaker 6>Moss and Taylor. You gotta like Moss a little more

0:41:05.160 --> 0:41:07.560
<v Speaker 6>than Taylor. Going into this game, but just a see

0:41:07.600 --> 0:41:11.520
<v Speaker 6>for both over to the Jacksonville side. It doesn't look

0:41:11.560 --> 0:41:13.520
<v Speaker 6>like any of my high school report cards, because there

0:41:13.520 --> 0:41:14.840
<v Speaker 6>are some good grades.

0:41:14.480 --> 0:41:17.080
<v Speaker 4>Here, starting with Travis Etn.

0:41:17.160 --> 0:41:19.800
<v Speaker 6>He gets an a one hundred and four combo yards

0:41:19.800 --> 0:41:22.360
<v Speaker 6>in a score against the Colts in Week one. India

0:41:22.360 --> 0:41:24.759
<v Speaker 6>has allowed three rushing touchdowns for running backs over their

0:41:24.840 --> 0:41:28.200
<v Speaker 6>last two games, and Etn is getting bellcow usage as

0:41:28.400 --> 0:41:31.520
<v Speaker 6>much to the chagrin of Paul Charchian and Tank Bigsby.

0:41:31.880 --> 0:41:36.000
<v Speaker 6>We're not gonna call Bigsby a dead dat yet when

0:41:36.000 --> 0:41:37.799
<v Speaker 6>you're bringing the Caddy shacks sounder, I like that.

0:41:37.960 --> 0:41:39.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, It's like, all right, look, I just need to

0:41:39.920 --> 0:41:42.680
<v Speaker 1>own up on this. I really thought Tank Bigsby would

0:41:42.719 --> 0:41:44.480
<v Speaker 1>have be a much bigger part of the offense. I

0:41:44.520 --> 0:41:47.120
<v Speaker 1>loved what I saw in the preseason. I was skeptical

0:41:47.160 --> 0:41:50.160
<v Speaker 1>about Travis Etn. He's been good and he is an

0:41:50.160 --> 0:41:53.479
<v Speaker 1>absolute belcow in a league where there's only about six

0:41:53.520 --> 0:41:57.160
<v Speaker 1>of them, and he's one of them. Yep, I I

0:41:57.320 --> 0:41:58.839
<v Speaker 1>was I was wrong.

0:41:59.400 --> 0:42:02.440
<v Speaker 6>Sticking with the Calvin Ridley gets an a. He had

0:42:02.480 --> 0:42:04.840
<v Speaker 6>eight catches one hundred and one yards in a touchdown

0:42:04.920 --> 0:42:07.479
<v Speaker 6>when these teams met in Week one. Other notable wide

0:42:07.520 --> 0:42:10.640
<v Speaker 6>receiver box scores against the Colts this year Nico Collins

0:42:10.640 --> 0:42:13.839
<v Speaker 6>seven for one forty six and two, Tank Dell seven

0:42:13.840 --> 0:42:16.839
<v Speaker 6>to seventy two and one, Puka Nakua nine catches one

0:42:16.960 --> 0:42:19.680
<v Speaker 6>sixty three in a touchdown, and DeAndre Hopkins had eight

0:42:19.719 --> 0:42:21.840
<v Speaker 6>catches for one hundred and forty yards against the Colts

0:42:22.040 --> 0:42:24.880
<v Speaker 6>last week. Missed a touchdown by about half a shoe size,

0:42:25.000 --> 0:42:27.160
<v Speaker 6>so he almost had a monster game. So Ridley in

0:42:27.200 --> 0:42:29.840
<v Speaker 6>line for another big game. He gets the a Christian

0:42:29.920 --> 0:42:32.000
<v Speaker 6>Kirk though, just to see he was invisible in this

0:42:32.040 --> 0:42:34.839
<v Speaker 6>Week one matchup, just one catch for nine score less.

0:42:35.320 --> 0:42:36.680
<v Speaker 1>I was in a panic at that point.

0:42:36.760 --> 0:42:37.320
<v Speaker 4>Yeah.

0:42:37.480 --> 0:42:41.120
<v Speaker 6>Colt slot cornerback Kenny Moore is legit. He hasn't allowed

0:42:41.120 --> 0:42:44.440
<v Speaker 6>a touchdown or more than five catches or sixty yards

0:42:44.440 --> 0:42:46.840
<v Speaker 6>in a game this season. It's a much better matchup

0:42:46.880 --> 0:42:50.120
<v Speaker 6>for boundary wide receivers. That's why Say Jones gets a

0:42:50.160 --> 0:42:52.120
<v Speaker 6>start in great with the see he had five catches

0:42:52.120 --> 0:42:54.000
<v Speaker 6>for fifty five yards in a touchdown in the Week

0:42:54.040 --> 0:42:54.479
<v Speaker 6>one game.

0:42:54.640 --> 0:42:56.799
<v Speaker 1>Well, you need to watch his injury stats, need to

0:42:56.800 --> 0:42:58.439
<v Speaker 1>watch a real chance he does not play.

0:42:58.480 --> 0:43:01.040
<v Speaker 6>If he doesn't play, obviously you're not going to play him.

0:43:01.080 --> 0:43:03.319
<v Speaker 6>I would roll with him as a wide receiver. Three

0:43:03.360 --> 0:43:05.760
<v Speaker 6>if he does suit up, the Colts are allowing nearly

0:43:05.800 --> 0:43:08.399
<v Speaker 6>fifteen catches and one hundred and ninety yards per game

0:43:08.440 --> 0:43:11.520
<v Speaker 6>to wide receivers, and again, a much stronger matchup for

0:43:11.600 --> 0:43:14.399
<v Speaker 6>the boundary guys. And if Jones does sit, I might

0:43:14.520 --> 0:43:17.200
<v Speaker 6>bump Kirk up to a beak because he can run

0:43:17.200 --> 0:43:20.480
<v Speaker 6>from the outside. A good matchup for Evan Ingram. He

0:43:20.520 --> 0:43:23.400
<v Speaker 6>gets a be five catches for forty nine scoreless yards

0:43:23.400 --> 0:43:24.520
<v Speaker 6>in the Week one matchup, but that.

0:43:24.480 --> 0:43:25.839
<v Speaker 4>Feels like a safe floor here.

0:43:25.920 --> 0:43:28.720
<v Speaker 6>Over their last two games, the Colts have yielded twenty

0:43:28.840 --> 0:43:32.239
<v Speaker 6>three targets to tight ends and lastly, easy a for

0:43:32.320 --> 0:43:34.600
<v Speaker 6>Trevor Lawrence with all these starting grades on his receivers.

0:43:34.800 --> 0:43:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, Lawrence is sitting on a I think of a

0:43:37.200 --> 0:43:39.160
<v Speaker 1>really nice game here. I think I've got him ranked

0:43:39.200 --> 0:43:41.400
<v Speaker 1>in the top five for the week. Should be a

0:43:41.920 --> 0:43:43.800
<v Speaker 1>good one for him. If you miss any part of

0:43:43.840 --> 0:43:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the show, you can always check all my player rankings

0:43:46.840 --> 0:43:49.680
<v Speaker 1>available for free at Guillotine leagues dot com. You don't

0:43:49.680 --> 0:43:52.080
<v Speaker 1>even have to be playing in a Guillotine league, although

0:43:52.160 --> 0:43:55.040
<v Speaker 1>why wouldn't you play in a guillotine league. But yeah,

0:43:55.080 --> 0:43:56.320
<v Speaker 1>if you don't want to, you don't have to. We

0:43:56.360 --> 0:43:57.600
<v Speaker 1>won't make you, and you can still get all the

0:43:57.600 --> 0:44:00.239
<v Speaker 1>player rankings for three if you do want to join

0:44:00.280 --> 0:44:02.919
<v Speaker 1>a guillotine league basically drafting every day of the week

0:44:02.920 --> 0:44:06.320
<v Speaker 1>except Sundays. So you got a lot of opportunities to

0:44:06.360 --> 0:44:09.800
<v Speaker 1>join a gullotine league. Thirteen weeks left, so thirteen team

0:44:10.000 --> 0:44:12.920
<v Speaker 1>leagues starting now at Guillotine leagues dot com. When we

0:44:12.960 --> 0:44:15.840
<v Speaker 1>came back, three tough Questions play along see if you

0:44:15.880 --> 0:44:36.200
<v Speaker 1>can go three and zero our number two Fantasy Football Weekly.

0:44:37.120 --> 0:44:40.359
<v Speaker 1>This is a segment we like to call three tough Questions.

0:44:40.840 --> 0:44:43.360
<v Speaker 3>Tough Question Number one.

0:44:43.200 --> 0:44:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Will Jonathan Taylor resume his role as a bell cow

0:44:47.480 --> 0:44:50.880
<v Speaker 1>back at any point this year? Scott?

0:44:51.600 --> 0:44:55.960
<v Speaker 2>So, when I first saw this, and in fairness, your

0:44:56.040 --> 0:44:59.279
<v Speaker 2>question mentioned seventy percent plus carries, Yes, I thought that

0:44:59.320 --> 0:45:02.880
<v Speaker 2>was an insanely high number until I look usage. Yeah,

0:45:03.239 --> 0:45:06.000
<v Speaker 2>last year eight games over that, the year before eight

0:45:06.040 --> 0:45:08.640
<v Speaker 2>games over that, like, and he missed games due to injury,

0:45:08.719 --> 0:45:11.200
<v Speaker 2>so the majority of his games he's going over that.

0:45:12.000 --> 0:45:12.120
<v Speaker 3>Uh.

0:45:12.719 --> 0:45:16.040
<v Speaker 1>I didn't want a way down the listeners with yeah,

0:45:16.160 --> 0:45:18.360
<v Speaker 1>and I wanted you guys to know what the standard was.

0:45:18.480 --> 0:45:22.160
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, coming back from ankle surgery and you know his

0:45:22.760 --> 0:45:27.160
<v Speaker 2>maybe he had it, maybe he didn't back issue. I

0:45:27.320 --> 0:45:29.360
<v Speaker 2>would I would expect it to be know and with

0:45:29.680 --> 0:45:32.839
<v Speaker 2>Moss playing the way he is, However, that investment they

0:45:32.840 --> 0:45:34.879
<v Speaker 2>paid it, It's not like investing in a quarterback. They

0:45:34.880 --> 0:45:37.520
<v Speaker 2>paid him to do some work out there. I think

0:45:37.560 --> 0:45:40.240
<v Speaker 2>he's gonna have once he gets going, once he's fully healthy,

0:45:40.280 --> 0:45:43.000
<v Speaker 2>I think he will have some games like that. I

0:45:43.040 --> 0:45:45.040
<v Speaker 2>don't know how long Moss can keep this up, and

0:45:45.080 --> 0:45:47.239
<v Speaker 2>if he's got the matchups for it, I think he

0:45:47.520 --> 0:45:50.719
<v Speaker 2>might get to that in a few games going later

0:45:50.760 --> 0:45:51.280
<v Speaker 2>in the season.

0:45:51.520 --> 0:45:52.200
<v Speaker 5>Well, so the.

0:45:52.200 --> 0:45:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Question was meant predominantly now predominantly like one game, okay,

0:45:57.680 --> 0:46:00.560
<v Speaker 1>on on total? Will he go back to being a

0:46:00.560 --> 0:46:02.480
<v Speaker 1>bell cow at some point this year? Where you know

0:46:02.520 --> 0:46:03.320
<v Speaker 1>from that point.

0:46:03.160 --> 0:46:03.880
<v Speaker 5>Didn't you know what?

0:46:04.000 --> 0:46:06.759
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna predominantly I'm gonna go now. I think they'll

0:46:06.800 --> 0:46:07.920
<v Speaker 2>be just enough split.

0:46:07.800 --> 0:46:11.239
<v Speaker 1>All right, Brian, Will Jonathan Taylor resume his role as

0:46:11.239 --> 0:46:13.720
<v Speaker 1>a bell cow back at any point this season?

0:46:15.040 --> 0:46:17.640
<v Speaker 4>I'm gonna say no, Zach Moss.

0:46:17.640 --> 0:46:19.840
<v Speaker 6>I mean, let's talk about the timing of last week's

0:46:19.880 --> 0:46:23.080
<v Speaker 6>breakout game. We've suffered through like three seasons of Zach Moss.

0:46:23.120 --> 0:46:25.239
<v Speaker 1>Tell me about it. Well, I was right there with

0:46:25.280 --> 0:46:28.120
<v Speaker 1>you taking for Zach Moss over the last three years.

0:46:28.360 --> 0:46:29.520
<v Speaker 4>I was riding Shotgun.

0:46:29.680 --> 0:46:31.800
<v Speaker 5>I was did you get a three year peak?

0:46:33.320 --> 0:46:36.880
<v Speaker 4>But he broken't? I mean, he's RB six right now, Zach.

0:46:36.800 --> 0:46:39.880
<v Speaker 1>West, you know what's gonna happen, Sorry to interrupt, twenty

0:46:39.960 --> 0:46:43.920
<v Speaker 1>twenty seven, Tank Bigsby is gonna come alive playing for

0:46:44.320 --> 0:46:45.960
<v Speaker 1>or I don't know, the Bears or something.

0:46:46.000 --> 0:46:48.279
<v Speaker 2>In fairness here, if you're gonna get a running back

0:46:48.360 --> 0:46:51.000
<v Speaker 2>like that, wrong, at least you're getting a double digit

0:46:51.080 --> 0:46:52.000
<v Speaker 2>round running back.

0:46:52.440 --> 0:46:55.720
<v Speaker 1>Right exactly. Nobody took Tank Bigsby before round fourteen? Anyway,

0:46:55.960 --> 0:46:57.319
<v Speaker 1>all right, sorry, continue, Brian.

0:46:57.920 --> 0:47:01.640
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, Moss currently orb sick in total points among running backs.

0:47:01.680 --> 0:47:03.160
<v Speaker 4>He didn't even play in Week one.

0:47:03.239 --> 0:47:06.080
<v Speaker 6>He went off for one hundred and ninety five combo

0:47:06.160 --> 0:47:09.359
<v Speaker 6>yards and two touchdowns against the Titans last week were

0:47:09.400 --> 0:47:12.000
<v Speaker 6>like the toughest run defense in the league at the time.

0:47:12.080 --> 0:47:15.719
<v Speaker 6>So there's legitimacy here to Zach Moss. And now the

0:47:15.760 --> 0:47:18.399
<v Speaker 6>Colts are invested in Jonathan Taylor for the next three

0:47:18.480 --> 0:47:21.600
<v Speaker 6>years at least on paper. They're competing in the division,

0:47:21.640 --> 0:47:24.160
<v Speaker 6>so they're not just gonna they want to know somewhat

0:47:24.200 --> 0:47:25.680
<v Speaker 6>salage him for a playoff run.

0:47:25.719 --> 0:47:28.520
<v Speaker 4>So I'm gonna say no, this is going to be a.

0:47:28.480 --> 0:47:31.800
<v Speaker 6>Sixty forty split. It best for Taylor in his favor.

0:47:32.360 --> 0:47:34.680
<v Speaker 1>This is a this is a tough question. It is

0:47:35.080 --> 0:47:36.839
<v Speaker 1>this lives up to the title.

0:47:36.560 --> 0:47:38.920
<v Speaker 3>Off question number one.

0:47:38.960 --> 0:47:41.319
<v Speaker 1>I had a lot of many similar talking points and

0:47:41.360 --> 0:47:43.480
<v Speaker 1>something about how good Zach Moss has been. You've hit

0:47:43.520 --> 0:47:47.920
<v Speaker 1>on most of those, Brian. From just a pure talent standpoint,

0:47:48.239 --> 0:47:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Taylor really should be way more talented given how

0:47:51.800 --> 0:47:55.240
<v Speaker 1>insanely good he was, not just really the one season,

0:47:55.280 --> 0:47:57.680
<v Speaker 1>but his rookie season after it took a while for

0:47:57.760 --> 0:48:00.320
<v Speaker 1>him to ramp up, like second half of rookies season

0:48:00.400 --> 0:48:04.960
<v Speaker 1>then the next year. Those two seasons he scored thirty

0:48:05.000 --> 0:48:08.560
<v Speaker 1>two touchdowns and he averaged one hundred and three yards

0:48:08.600 --> 0:48:11.680
<v Speaker 1>per game average. I mean, it was an insane run

0:48:11.719 --> 0:48:12.360
<v Speaker 1>for him.

0:48:12.719 --> 0:48:12.920
<v Speaker 5>You know.

0:48:13.040 --> 0:48:17.799
<v Speaker 1>Eventually, talent almost always prevails in the NFL. Yeah, but

0:48:17.840 --> 0:48:21.359
<v Speaker 1>can it prevail at the seventy percent threshold? That's when

0:48:21.440 --> 0:48:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Zach Moss has proven himself to be good. I lean know,

0:48:26.640 --> 0:48:28.960
<v Speaker 1>and you know and it's funny. At first I thought, well,

0:48:29.000 --> 0:48:30.839
<v Speaker 1>the contract, he's forty million dollars, you want to get

0:48:30.840 --> 0:48:33.840
<v Speaker 1>a return on that. But then I started thinking, Okay,

0:48:33.840 --> 0:48:37.799
<v Speaker 1>it's three years. They may want to not run him

0:48:37.960 --> 0:48:40.719
<v Speaker 1>into the ground in year one. If it's three year deal.

0:48:40.960 --> 0:48:43.200
<v Speaker 2>I think about this a fair amount. And this is

0:48:43.239 --> 0:48:45.120
<v Speaker 2>a little bit of a segue. How much does coach

0:48:45.160 --> 0:48:47.160
<v Speaker 2>he like? Do the coaches even care about that when

0:48:47.160 --> 0:48:48.680
<v Speaker 2>they're on the field and trying to win a game?

0:48:49.000 --> 0:48:49.200
<v Speaker 3>You know?

0:48:49.400 --> 0:48:51.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean in the heat of the battle.

0:48:51.840 --> 0:48:54.239
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, coaches do whatever you like. We're trying to see.

0:48:54.360 --> 0:48:56.799
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, we're going to go now.

0:48:58.680 --> 0:49:00.920
<v Speaker 3>Tough. Question Number two.

0:49:01.040 --> 0:49:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Is kJ Osborne going to be a viable weekly starter

0:49:04.680 --> 0:49:06.279
<v Speaker 1>while Justin Jefferson is out?

0:49:06.920 --> 0:49:10.279
<v Speaker 6>Brian Johnson, I'm gonna say no, you start him this

0:49:10.400 --> 0:49:14.120
<v Speaker 6>week at Chicago a good matchup. Week seven, he has

0:49:14.160 --> 0:49:16.240
<v Speaker 6>the forty nine ers. It's not as bad a matchup

0:49:16.280 --> 0:49:17.960
<v Speaker 6>as you think against San Francisco because you have to

0:49:18.000 --> 0:49:19.840
<v Speaker 6>throw a lot against them because the forty nine ers

0:49:19.840 --> 0:49:21.600
<v Speaker 6>score a lot of points. But then at Green Bay

0:49:21.640 --> 0:49:24.920
<v Speaker 6>a bad matchup versus Atlanta a bad matchup. Beyond that,

0:49:25.360 --> 0:49:28.080
<v Speaker 6>in week ten, when when Justin Jefferson could be back,

0:49:28.080 --> 0:49:30.239
<v Speaker 6>We're not sure if he will be. They have the

0:49:30.280 --> 0:49:34.160
<v Speaker 6>Saints another brutal matchup and kJ Osborne you called them

0:49:34.200 --> 0:49:36.799
<v Speaker 6>slippery earlier. Were you talking about his hands and how

0:49:36.800 --> 0:49:38.319
<v Speaker 6>many drops he does?

0:49:38.520 --> 0:49:39.240
<v Speaker 1>Too many drops?

0:49:39.239 --> 0:49:44.239
<v Speaker 6>He was ducking, dodging, he diving, touched it. He can

0:49:44.280 --> 0:49:47.000
<v Speaker 6>duck the pass he can so he can he can duck, dive, dodge,

0:49:47.000 --> 0:49:51.720
<v Speaker 6>wrenches footballs. He's not a viable weekly starter. It's matchup

0:49:51.760 --> 0:49:54.080
<v Speaker 6>base and right now, looking ahead, he doesn't have many

0:49:54.080 --> 0:49:56.319
<v Speaker 6>good matchups outside of the Bears this week.

0:49:56.360 --> 0:49:57.840
<v Speaker 4>So I'm gonna say, no, not viable.

0:49:58.480 --> 0:50:01.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's go to Scott Fish. It's kJ Osbourne

0:50:01.080 --> 0:50:04.440
<v Speaker 1>going to be a viable weekly starter while Justin Jefferson

0:50:04.480 --> 0:50:04.839
<v Speaker 1>is out.

0:50:05.120 --> 0:50:07.280
<v Speaker 2>So when I started looking at this, I thought, yeah,

0:50:07.480 --> 0:50:11.280
<v Speaker 2>duh at because it's while Justin Jefferson is out.

0:50:11.719 --> 0:50:14.280
<v Speaker 5>You know, it's not for the season. Like for the season.

0:50:14.320 --> 0:50:16.799
<v Speaker 2>I'd be like, I don't know once Jefferson's back, but

0:50:16.880 --> 0:50:20.000
<v Speaker 2>while he's out, yes, the matchups are absolutely very tough.

0:50:20.480 --> 0:50:24.520
<v Speaker 2>But also this Vikings team passes at the highest rate

0:50:24.600 --> 0:50:27.360
<v Speaker 2>in the NFL, and it's actually not that close. It's

0:50:27.400 --> 0:50:30.480
<v Speaker 2>insane how much they pass. He was already playing ninety

0:50:30.520 --> 0:50:33.200
<v Speaker 2>percent of the snaps, but now thirty four percent of

0:50:33.239 --> 0:50:36.160
<v Speaker 2>the team's target shaars, thirteen percent of the end zone targets,

0:50:36.200 --> 0:50:38.719
<v Speaker 2>and forty eight percent of the air yards need to

0:50:38.840 --> 0:50:41.160
<v Speaker 2>go somewhere. Maybe the offense isn't as good and there's

0:50:41.239 --> 0:50:44.360
<v Speaker 2>little less, but it needs to go somewhere. And maybe

0:50:44.360 --> 0:50:47.000
<v Speaker 2>if the offense is not as good, Minnesota will fall

0:50:47.040 --> 0:50:49.839
<v Speaker 2>behind more in some of those tough matchups coming up,

0:50:50.120 --> 0:50:52.520
<v Speaker 2>and they're gonna have to pass a lot. I think

0:50:52.520 --> 0:50:56.239
<v Speaker 2>he's absolutely viable at minimum a wide receiver three on

0:50:56.280 --> 0:50:57.400
<v Speaker 2>a lot of fantasy teams.

0:50:58.920 --> 0:51:01.400
<v Speaker 1>The good on kJ As is he knows this offense.

0:51:01.480 --> 0:51:05.600
<v Speaker 1>He likely knows all of justin Jefferson's routes. He's been

0:51:06.160 --> 0:51:09.760
<v Speaker 1>migrated out of the slot this year. In the previous years,

0:51:09.800 --> 0:51:12.160
<v Speaker 1>he had been like a sixty percent slot guy. This

0:51:12.160 --> 0:51:14.560
<v Speaker 1>this year he's down to forty five percent, So he

0:51:14.680 --> 0:51:16.960
<v Speaker 1>hadn't been just this pure slot guy like he had

0:51:17.040 --> 0:51:20.240
<v Speaker 1>been much more in years past. You mentioned Kevin O'Connell

0:51:20.280 --> 0:51:24.480
<v Speaker 1>loves to pass league's highest pass ratio. That's good. The

0:51:24.600 --> 0:51:28.799
<v Speaker 1>drops have been ugly this year, But if you go

0:51:28.880 --> 0:51:31.399
<v Speaker 1>back and look at the totality of his career. He's

0:51:31.400 --> 0:51:34.239
<v Speaker 1>not a dropped ball guy. It's it's been unique to

0:51:34.360 --> 0:51:35.319
<v Speaker 1>this season.

0:51:35.160 --> 0:51:38.279
<v Speaker 2>And drops are one of the least sticky stats for

0:51:38.320 --> 0:51:38.960
<v Speaker 2>wide receivers.

0:51:38.960 --> 0:51:40.359
<v Speaker 5>I bet they're not sticky at all.

0:51:40.440 --> 0:51:46.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, unless you are. I'm thinking of Williamson, Devin Williams,

0:51:46.800 --> 0:51:47.680
<v Speaker 1>Troy Williamson.

0:51:47.719 --> 0:51:48.120
<v Speaker 5>There you go.

0:51:49.320 --> 0:51:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Now here's the real ketch fairness.

0:51:51.360 --> 0:51:53.040
<v Speaker 5>He did drop. They just went through his arms.

0:51:53.160 --> 0:51:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Capture too. Where JJ kills defenders is on the deep

0:51:58.719 --> 0:52:01.640
<v Speaker 1>balls from the strong armed arm of Kirk Cousins. And

0:52:01.680 --> 0:52:05.360
<v Speaker 1>then what he does after the catchdown field that's not

0:52:05.840 --> 0:52:10.160
<v Speaker 1>kJ Osbourne. Get this. He has zero targets this year

0:52:10.239 --> 0:52:15.000
<v Speaker 1>over nineteen yards. Last year he had four catches over

0:52:15.080 --> 0:52:19.920
<v Speaker 1>nineteen yards. That's it. This is so it's so much

0:52:20.000 --> 0:52:24.840
<v Speaker 1>harder to gain fantasy relevancy when you're not getting targeted downfield.

0:52:24.920 --> 0:52:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Those those are the plays that you that where you

0:52:27.320 --> 0:52:31.640
<v Speaker 1>roll up the fantasy points. We mentioned the negative schedule.

0:52:32.040 --> 0:52:34.960
<v Speaker 1>If I imagine myself after Chicago this week talking about

0:52:35.040 --> 0:52:38.360
<v Speaker 1>kJ Osborne, it's going to be bench and C bench, C,

0:52:38.600 --> 0:52:41.759
<v Speaker 1>bench C kind of stuff. I don't think. I don't

0:52:41.760 --> 0:52:43.799
<v Speaker 1>think he's going to be a viable weekly starter, not

0:52:43.880 --> 0:52:47.040
<v Speaker 1>weekly starter. You know the question was phrase weekly starter.

0:52:47.160 --> 0:52:48.160
<v Speaker 1>We're going to go now.

0:52:48.760 --> 0:52:50.520
<v Speaker 3>Tough question number three.

0:52:50.920 --> 0:52:54.319
<v Speaker 1>Kansas City wide receiver Rashid Rice will finish the year

0:52:54.480 --> 0:52:58.480
<v Speaker 1>as a wide receiver one, a wide receiver two, a

0:52:58.520 --> 0:53:00.000
<v Speaker 1>flex or a bench player.

0:53:00.320 --> 0:53:03.399
<v Speaker 2>Scott Fish first hot take on Osborne. Maybe he didn't

0:53:03.400 --> 0:53:05.440
<v Speaker 2>see those deep targets because Jefferson was.

0:53:05.480 --> 0:53:09.080
<v Speaker 1>There over to Rashid. Right, we're on the Jefferson routes right,

0:53:09.080 --> 0:53:11.680
<v Speaker 1>so you know, maybe wide receiver two.

0:53:12.280 --> 0:53:14.520
<v Speaker 2>I'm going a little bullish. We've seen this many times

0:53:14.560 --> 0:53:17.400
<v Speaker 2>before where it's taken some rookies a while to start hitting,

0:53:17.440 --> 0:53:19.160
<v Speaker 2>and then they hit late in the season. We saw

0:53:19.200 --> 0:53:22.520
<v Speaker 2>with John Dottson last year. Obviously, new new oci and

0:53:22.560 --> 0:53:26.440
<v Speaker 2>all that stuff this year. So he gets thirty two

0:53:26.560 --> 0:53:29.600
<v Speaker 2>percent targets per route run, meaning when he gets in

0:53:29.680 --> 0:53:33.560
<v Speaker 2>the game, he gets he gets targeted just for the listeners,

0:53:33.680 --> 0:53:36.840
<v Speaker 2>Jamar Chase twenty five percent, justin Jefferson twenty eight percent.

0:53:37.320 --> 0:53:40.200
<v Speaker 2>Like so when Rashid Rice gets in they throw to him.

0:53:40.719 --> 0:53:43.040
<v Speaker 2>It just says that they don't either fully trust him

0:53:43.080 --> 0:53:44.720
<v Speaker 2>to be out there all the time, or he doesn't

0:53:44.760 --> 0:53:48.320
<v Speaker 2>have all the routes down or whatever. He's getting worked

0:53:48.360 --> 0:53:52.080
<v Speaker 2>in thirteen percent of the team's end zone targets when

0:53:52.160 --> 0:53:56.680
<v Speaker 2>he's in the game. The Chiefs offense also hasn't really

0:53:56.719 --> 0:53:59.359
<v Speaker 2>fully come together. They seem a little off so far

0:53:59.440 --> 0:54:02.239
<v Speaker 2>early in this Once they get going, and for sure,

0:54:02.280 --> 0:54:05.799
<v Speaker 2>you Rice starts taking more snaps, yeah, I like it.

0:54:05.880 --> 0:54:08.359
<v Speaker 2>Wide receiver two later in the season.

0:54:09.000 --> 0:54:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Brian Kansas City wide receiver Rashie Rice will finish the

0:54:12.719 --> 0:54:16.160
<v Speaker 1>year as a wide receiver one, wide receiver two, flex

0:54:16.360 --> 0:54:16.760
<v Speaker 1>or bench.

0:54:17.440 --> 0:54:20.280
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, I'm gonna echo what most of Scott said. They're

0:54:20.360 --> 0:54:22.719
<v Speaker 6>averaging less than five targets per games because he's not

0:54:22.760 --> 0:54:25.480
<v Speaker 6>on the field enough. The snaps go up, the targets

0:54:25.480 --> 0:54:26.960
<v Speaker 6>will go up, and you have to trust that's going

0:54:27.000 --> 0:54:30.000
<v Speaker 6>to happen soon, hopefully, because he clearly looks like the

0:54:30.000 --> 0:54:32.200
<v Speaker 6>best wide receiver on the team. And of course we're

0:54:32.239 --> 0:54:34.640
<v Speaker 6>not talking about Travis Kelsey. He's a tight end who

0:54:34.680 --> 0:54:37.239
<v Speaker 6>really plays wide receiver like Kyle Pitts. But I don't

0:54:37.280 --> 0:54:39.360
<v Speaker 6>know how how quickly they're going to ramp up Rashi

0:54:39.440 --> 0:54:42.760
<v Speaker 6>Rice's involvement in the offense, even though they really should.

0:54:42.840 --> 0:54:44.680
<v Speaker 6>But I'm gonna play it safe and just say flex.

0:54:44.719 --> 0:54:48.040
<v Speaker 6>But He's definitely gonna be startable most weeks down stretch.

0:54:48.120 --> 0:54:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, normally you'd highlight the opportunity inherent in catching passes

0:54:52.400 --> 0:54:54.399
<v Speaker 1>from Patrick Mahomes, but we all know that that has

0:54:54.480 --> 0:54:58.400
<v Speaker 1>not equated into wide receiver success for anybody outside of

0:54:58.440 --> 0:55:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Tyreek Hill in the history of Patrick Holmes career. So

0:55:02.640 --> 0:55:06.479
<v Speaker 1>there is massive opportunity though, for a Kansas City wide

0:55:06.480 --> 0:55:11.839
<v Speaker 1>receiver to finally take command of that position group. This

0:55:11.920 --> 0:55:16.480
<v Speaker 1>is the first guy that looks like eye test she

0:55:16.840 --> 0:55:20.400
<v Speaker 1>Rice looks like he could be that guy. He's big,

0:55:20.560 --> 0:55:23.600
<v Speaker 1>he's strong, and he's got shocking burst after the catch.

0:55:23.880 --> 0:55:27.080
<v Speaker 1>He looks like a running back. I love that about him.

0:55:28.120 --> 0:55:31.440
<v Speaker 1>The draft equity is good. It's second round pick, although

0:55:31.480 --> 0:55:33.080
<v Speaker 1>that hasn't done anything for sky Moore.

0:55:33.080 --> 0:55:36.080
<v Speaker 5>Was also a second round pick, first round pick.

0:55:36.480 --> 0:55:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Or Mian kil Harmon. Great point, justin Watson's going to

0:55:38.880 --> 0:55:46.400
<v Speaker 1>be out for a while round by the Giants. I

0:55:46.440 --> 0:55:49.560
<v Speaker 1>think in totality we've finished the year. I think it's

0:55:49.560 --> 0:55:52.120
<v Speaker 1>going to be flex. I want to believe wide receiver,

0:55:52.200 --> 0:55:54.360
<v Speaker 1>I know in my heart, but I think the reality

0:55:54.640 --> 0:55:57.040
<v Speaker 1>we always want these rookies to come along faster than

0:55:57.080 --> 0:56:00.720
<v Speaker 1>they do, especially receivers almost always. I think the answer

0:56:00.800 --> 0:56:01.400
<v Speaker 1>is going to be flex.

0:56:01.480 --> 0:56:03.600
<v Speaker 5>The answer is flex. I just wanted to be fun

0:56:03.640 --> 0:56:04.160
<v Speaker 5>and bullish.

0:56:04.280 --> 0:56:07.360
<v Speaker 1>I like, you want to be bullish about a Patriots

0:56:07.360 --> 0:56:10.680
<v Speaker 1>offense averaging eleven not even the offense as a team

0:56:10.760 --> 0:56:13.719
<v Speaker 1>eleven points per game. The offense is even worse. Nope,

0:56:13.760 --> 0:56:18.759
<v Speaker 1>this is a disaster situation for New England. Bill Belichick's

0:56:18.800 --> 0:56:23.560
<v Speaker 1>two biggest most lopsided losses of his entire career back

0:56:23.600 --> 0:56:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the last two weeks. General manager Bill Belichick has sunk

0:56:29.080 --> 0:56:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the career of head coach Bill Belichick. Scott, talk to

0:56:33.200 --> 0:56:35.480
<v Speaker 1>me about the Patriots. Is there anybody you're playing even

0:56:35.560 --> 0:56:37.240
<v Speaker 1>against the Raiders?

0:56:37.560 --> 0:56:41.839
<v Speaker 2>Nope, Nope, there is that Mac Jones. Has you know,

0:56:42.160 --> 0:56:44.680
<v Speaker 2>been benched basically the last week or two, oh yeah,

0:56:44.760 --> 0:56:48.000
<v Speaker 2>two weeks twice, yeah, twice, So we don't even know

0:56:48.040 --> 0:56:50.960
<v Speaker 2>that he'll finish the game. Since the opener, Mac has

0:56:51.080 --> 0:56:53.840
<v Speaker 2>barely been averaging two hundred yards and just two scores

0:56:53.880 --> 0:56:58.040
<v Speaker 2>total in those four games. This fluttering offense puts all

0:56:58.040 --> 0:57:01.160
<v Speaker 2>the pass catchers on the bench, even though Juju Smith, Schuster,

0:57:01.440 --> 0:57:04.319
<v Speaker 2>and Tamario Douglas will be out. I can't even put

0:57:04.360 --> 0:57:11.040
<v Speaker 2>Devonte Parker, anybody in your lineup? This this Pats offense,

0:57:11.120 --> 0:57:15.400
<v Speaker 2>get this? Thirty four straight drives without a touchdown? Oh geez,

0:57:15.520 --> 0:57:17.720
<v Speaker 2>thirty four straight drives.

0:57:17.400 --> 0:57:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Thirty four cracks at the end zone and you can't

0:57:19.600 --> 0:57:19.840
<v Speaker 1>do it?

0:57:19.960 --> 0:57:20.320
<v Speaker 5>Yeah?

0:57:20.400 --> 0:57:22.960
<v Speaker 2>So do you do you want Hunter Henry, a mostly

0:57:23.080 --> 0:57:24.920
<v Speaker 2>touchdown dependent tight end in there?

0:57:25.000 --> 0:57:25.400
<v Speaker 5>Nope?

0:57:26.120 --> 0:57:31.320
<v Speaker 2>Ramondre Stevenson has gone full split with Ezekiel Elliott over

0:57:31.360 --> 0:57:34.960
<v Speaker 2>the last two weeks, and he's super inefficient. Third worst

0:57:35.040 --> 0:57:39.360
<v Speaker 2>rush yards over expected, behind only Dalvin Cook and cab Akers.

0:57:39.680 --> 0:57:42.640
<v Speaker 1>What happened to Ramondre Stevenson so dynamic?

0:57:43.320 --> 0:57:47.240
<v Speaker 5>Get this three catches total in the last three weeks.

0:57:47.000 --> 0:57:49.640
<v Speaker 1>As a as a good pass catcher as well.

0:57:49.920 --> 0:57:55.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Ramandre's snap percentages decreased five consecutive weeks. Zeke's increased

0:57:55.600 --> 0:58:00.320
<v Speaker 2>four street But you're not starting either. Over to the Raiders,

0:58:00.600 --> 0:58:03.040
<v Speaker 2>I had Jacoby Myers as might take a chance on me.

0:58:03.080 --> 0:58:06.240
<v Speaker 2>Player DeVonta Adams is an automatic a every week. Just

0:58:06.280 --> 0:58:09.560
<v Speaker 2>get him in your lineup, Jimmy g I do have

0:58:09.800 --> 0:58:13.560
<v Speaker 2>on the bench though. The New England Patriots only allowing

0:58:13.600 --> 0:58:15.760
<v Speaker 2>two hundred and eight yards per game and just four

0:58:15.760 --> 0:58:17.960
<v Speaker 2>scores over five games they played.

0:58:18.240 --> 0:58:18.880
<v Speaker 5>Jalen Hurts.

0:58:18.880 --> 0:58:22.000
<v Speaker 2>They played Tua, they played They've played some quarterbacks and

0:58:22.000 --> 0:58:26.200
<v Speaker 2>they've done that. Third hardest matchup for quarterbacks. Jimmy G's

0:58:26.280 --> 0:58:28.640
<v Speaker 2>on your bench. But I think Davante and Jacoby just

0:58:28.680 --> 0:58:30.640
<v Speaker 2>get the He can throw two hundred yards in one

0:58:30.680 --> 0:58:32.960
<v Speaker 2>score and Joe Cooby and DeVante can be startable.

0:58:33.080 --> 0:58:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that is true.

0:58:33.920 --> 0:58:35.640
<v Speaker 2>They'll get all of it, and they do. That's how

0:58:35.640 --> 0:58:39.000
<v Speaker 2>their offense is set up. Josh Jacobs got a B

0:58:39.120 --> 0:58:42.160
<v Speaker 2>grade on him. Seventy nine percent of the running back snaps,

0:58:42.280 --> 0:58:46.080
<v Speaker 2>seventy five percent of the rushops opportunities, nineteen percent of

0:58:46.080 --> 0:58:49.360
<v Speaker 2>the team targets. Been over twenty touches in four or

0:58:49.360 --> 0:58:51.880
<v Speaker 2>five games. That's gonna get you the volume c anyway.

0:58:52.040 --> 0:58:55.439
<v Speaker 2>But he's averaging nearly four or averaging four point six

0:58:55.560 --> 0:58:58.760
<v Speaker 2>catches per game wiki, which gets his grade a little

0:58:58.800 --> 0:59:01.920
<v Speaker 2>bit higher. And the path so the tenth easiest matchup.

0:59:02.200 --> 0:59:04.680
<v Speaker 2>They just gave up ninety seven to Kamara and ninety

0:59:04.720 --> 0:59:07.840
<v Speaker 2>to Kendrey Miller just last week in one game. Josh

0:59:07.920 --> 0:59:09.680
<v Speaker 2>Jacobs gets everything B grade there.

0:59:09.760 --> 0:59:14.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it feels like a very strong opportunity for Josh Jacobs.

0:59:14.880 --> 0:59:18.840
<v Speaker 1>It started slow, but Jacob's coming around now it sounds

0:59:18.840 --> 0:59:21.760
<v Speaker 1>like we could be talking about Justin Fields, who started slow,

0:59:21.840 --> 0:59:26.160
<v Speaker 1>coming around beautifully right now. Does he stay hot against

0:59:26.200 --> 0:59:29.240
<v Speaker 1>the Minnesota Vikings? Find out when we come back to

0:59:29.320 --> 0:59:53.240
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly. Welcome back Fantasy Football Weekly. Paul Georgian,

0:59:53.400 --> 0:59:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Scott Fish, Brian Johnson with you. Vikings take on the Bears.

0:59:58.040 --> 1:00:00.920
<v Speaker 1>It's a Vikings first game without Justin Jeffer, which obviously

1:00:01.080 --> 1:00:04.160
<v Speaker 1>net hurts the whole offense, but it does provide more

1:00:04.200 --> 1:00:08.200
<v Speaker 1>targets for kJ Osbourne, Jordan Addison, more runs for Alexander Madison.

1:00:08.600 --> 1:00:11.720
<v Speaker 1>Bear secondary gets healthier here with Jalen Johnson coming back,

1:00:12.160 --> 1:00:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Eddie Jackson expected back as well, that could be a

1:00:14.720 --> 1:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>huge boosts for them. Let's start with Alexander Madison. So

1:00:17.760 --> 1:00:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I find this fascinating that finally a Vikings run heavy

1:00:21.760 --> 1:00:25.080
<v Speaker 1>game plan should be coming here, not just because Jefferson

1:00:25.160 --> 1:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>is out, but also because the Bears run defense is bad.

1:00:28.640 --> 1:00:31.600
<v Speaker 1>Chicago's allowed the third most points to running backs this season.

1:00:31.800 --> 1:00:34.520
<v Speaker 1>They've allowed the third most tight ends to running backs

1:00:34.560 --> 1:00:37.480
<v Speaker 1>eight already, did I say tight ends? Third most touchdowns

1:00:37.480 --> 1:00:40.960
<v Speaker 1>to running backs eight already? Also the most receiving yards

1:00:41.040 --> 1:00:44.000
<v Speaker 1>to running backs. Madison's not a gifted pass catcher, but

1:00:44.040 --> 1:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>he can pull in a few. The Vikings have the

1:00:46.200 --> 1:00:50.040
<v Speaker 1>fifth best run block win rate, and the Vikings offensive

1:00:50.080 --> 1:00:53.160
<v Speaker 1>line ranks number one by Pro Football Focus and run Blocking.

1:00:53.520 --> 1:00:56.160
<v Speaker 1>I think Chris sitting on a really nice Alexander Madison game.

1:00:56.480 --> 1:00:58.360
<v Speaker 1>This is the first one that I feel good about

1:00:58.400 --> 1:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>having in my lineup in all year.

1:01:00.520 --> 1:01:02.560
<v Speaker 5>Viking offensive line number one.

1:01:02.760 --> 1:01:05.760
<v Speaker 1>I never thought that would happen. It's a weird end

1:01:05.800 --> 1:01:08.480
<v Speaker 1>of time stuff right here. Let's go to the receivers,

1:01:08.480 --> 1:01:11.640
<v Speaker 1>beginning with TJ. Hockinson coming off a brutal game with

1:01:11.760 --> 1:01:15.440
<v Speaker 1>three drops. He leads all tight ends in targets, probably

1:01:15.520 --> 1:01:18.800
<v Speaker 1>drops two, and that won't diminish. With Jefferson out, He's

1:01:18.840 --> 1:01:21.320
<v Speaker 1>going to continue to get a ton of looks for

1:01:21.400 --> 1:01:26.080
<v Speaker 1>tight ends against the Bears. Volume equals success. Every tight

1:01:26.160 --> 1:01:29.160
<v Speaker 1>end to get over fifty yards has also scored, and

1:01:29.240 --> 1:01:31.960
<v Speaker 1>only one tight end has seen five or more targets

1:01:31.960 --> 1:01:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and not scored. Eighty five percent of the tight end

1:01:34.600 --> 1:01:38.160
<v Speaker 1>targets against the Bears have been completed. So even coming

1:01:38.200 --> 1:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>off a bad game for TJ, howkinson a grade on

1:01:41.640 --> 1:01:45.520
<v Speaker 1>this opportunity? Boy, Let's see if it works out. Jordan

1:01:45.520 --> 1:01:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Addison expected to go in this game. We're going to

1:01:47.680 --> 1:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>continue to monitor him up to game time. However, should

1:01:51.360 --> 1:01:54.000
<v Speaker 1>continue running roughly the same route tree that he was

1:01:54.440 --> 1:01:57.280
<v Speaker 1>before the Jefferson injury, but he should see more passes

1:01:57.320 --> 1:02:00.480
<v Speaker 1>and Jefferson leaves behind ten targets per game. The Bears

1:02:00.480 --> 1:02:03.560
<v Speaker 1>are bottom twelve in yards and touchdowns allowed to receivers,

1:02:03.560 --> 1:02:05.720
<v Speaker 1>but as I mentioned, they are healthier now and should

1:02:05.720 --> 1:02:09.600
<v Speaker 1>be better. I'm a little bit worried that Jalen Johnson,

1:02:09.600 --> 1:02:12.000
<v Speaker 1>the one good cornerback the Bears have, that he's just

1:02:12.040 --> 1:02:14.920
<v Speaker 1>going to shadow Jordan Addison and take that deep stuff

1:02:14.960 --> 1:02:17.080
<v Speaker 1>that Jordan Adison has been good at take that away.

1:02:17.400 --> 1:02:19.760
<v Speaker 1>That would worry me, and it subdues my ranking on

1:02:19.840 --> 1:02:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Addison a bit. That, along with the injury, knocks

1:02:22.400 --> 1:02:25.680
<v Speaker 1>him down to a C grade. kJ Osbourne was might

1:02:25.720 --> 1:02:27.640
<v Speaker 1>take a chance on the wide receiver. He comes in

1:02:27.680 --> 1:02:30.080
<v Speaker 1>with a C grade as well, and Kirk Cousins I've

1:02:30.080 --> 1:02:32.240
<v Speaker 1>got I've got an A grade on Hockinson, I've got

1:02:32.280 --> 1:02:35.040
<v Speaker 1>C grades on his receivers, so we'll split the difference

1:02:35.040 --> 1:02:37.960
<v Speaker 1>and go B grade on Kirk Cousins. He's the NFL

1:02:38.080 --> 1:02:41.800
<v Speaker 1>leader in completions and touchdown passes, and the Bears have

1:02:41.840 --> 1:02:44.880
<v Speaker 1>allowed the second most passing touchdowns and the most passing yards.

1:02:44.880 --> 1:02:48.120
<v Speaker 1>But again, as I mentioned, they should be getting healthier

1:02:48.120 --> 1:02:50.919
<v Speaker 1>with Jalen Johnson and Eddie Jackson back. Bears ranked dead

1:02:51.000 --> 1:02:54.160
<v Speaker 1>last and pass rush by Pro Football Focus, So Kirk

1:02:54.160 --> 1:02:56.520
<v Speaker 1>should have some time in the pocket for a change

1:02:56.560 --> 1:02:59.240
<v Speaker 1>for the NFL's most quarterback in back to back years.

1:03:00.000 --> 1:03:02.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's go to the Chicago side. I think

1:03:02.640 --> 1:03:04.760
<v Speaker 1>we've gone to a point where DJ Morris just obvious

1:03:04.760 --> 1:03:06.880
<v Speaker 1>a guy now, but we don't have to really even

1:03:06.880 --> 1:03:09.680
<v Speaker 1>talk about it. But rest assured none of the Vikings

1:03:09.720 --> 1:03:12.360
<v Speaker 1>cornerbacks can hang with him, and a Caleb Evans, one

1:03:12.360 --> 1:03:14.840
<v Speaker 1>of the starting cornerbacks, may not play in this game

1:03:14.880 --> 1:03:17.919
<v Speaker 1>with a knee injury. That would only give more fuel

1:03:18.000 --> 1:03:20.120
<v Speaker 1>to the fire for the A grade on DJ Moore.

1:03:20.160 --> 1:03:23.440
<v Speaker 6>I saw justin Fields as a perfect passer rating when

1:03:23.480 --> 1:03:25.280
<v Speaker 6>targeting DJ Moore this year.

1:03:26.880 --> 1:03:28.760
<v Speaker 1>That's saying a lot because justin Field is not of

1:03:28.760 --> 1:03:31.400
<v Speaker 1>a perfect passer rating in most other situations. But you

1:03:31.440 --> 1:03:34.680
<v Speaker 1>know what, he does have the second most passing touchdowns

1:03:34.680 --> 1:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>in the league and the second most rushing yards among quarterbacks.

1:03:38.200 --> 1:03:40.840
<v Speaker 1>That's why we drafted justin Field to begin with. The

1:03:40.920 --> 1:03:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Vikings have surrendered multiple quarterback touchdowns in every game except

1:03:44.760 --> 1:03:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Bryce Young and the only mobile quarterback they faced, Jalen Hurts,

1:03:48.160 --> 1:03:51.440
<v Speaker 1>scored twice on the ground. The Vikings on the second

1:03:51.440 --> 1:03:55.080
<v Speaker 1>worst opponent completion percentage and the second worst pass rush

1:03:55.560 --> 1:03:59.120
<v Speaker 1>pressure by ranked by por Football Focus, so a grade

1:03:59.120 --> 1:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>on justin Field. Cole Komet comes in with a B grade.

1:04:03.240 --> 1:04:05.920
<v Speaker 1>He's not three touchdowns in the last two weeks. He's

1:04:05.960 --> 1:04:09.280
<v Speaker 1>topped forty five yards and four straight against Minnesota. He

1:04:09.360 --> 1:04:11.920
<v Speaker 1>scored a touchdown last time they faced each other. The

1:04:12.000 --> 1:04:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Vikings have allowed three touchdowns the tight ends already, including

1:04:14.560 --> 1:04:17.360
<v Speaker 1>three in the last three games. Three different opposing tight

1:04:17.440 --> 1:04:23.280
<v Speaker 1>ends have had six or more receptions against Minnesota. Darnell

1:04:23.440 --> 1:04:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Mooney coming in with a starting grade YEP. He runs

1:04:26.440 --> 1:04:28.280
<v Speaker 1>from the slot in three quarters of his plays and

1:04:28.320 --> 1:04:32.080
<v Speaker 1>as a glorious matchup against Minnesota. The Vikings guard the

1:04:32.120 --> 1:04:34.280
<v Speaker 1>slot with a lot of different ways, but most often

1:04:34.280 --> 1:04:38.280
<v Speaker 1>the you struggling cornerback Byron Murphy. He's allowed three touchdowns already,

1:04:38.280 --> 1:04:41.600
<v Speaker 1>including two last week, and he's giving up an approaching

1:04:41.720 --> 1:04:44.880
<v Speaker 1>perfect opposer passer rating of one hundred and forty one

1:04:45.200 --> 1:04:49.040
<v Speaker 1>for Byron Murphy. Minnesota's allowed the third most fantasy points

1:04:49.080 --> 1:04:52.960
<v Speaker 1>to slot receivers like Darnell Mooney. Dust him off for

1:04:53.040 --> 1:04:57.440
<v Speaker 1>this game. And lastly, Khalil Herbert's been ruled out. Roshawn

1:04:57.560 --> 1:05:01.439
<v Speaker 1>Johnson's been ruled out, Travis Homer's been ruled out. DoD

1:05:01.520 --> 1:05:05.560
<v Speaker 1>de Foreman last man standing. He'll give up virtually all

1:05:05.680 --> 1:05:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the work here. Darrnton Evans, by the way, is your

1:05:08.360 --> 1:05:09.360
<v Speaker 1>backup running back?

1:05:09.520 --> 1:05:14.160
<v Speaker 5>What about blazing game car the fullback Viking to carry.

1:05:14.360 --> 1:05:17.400
<v Speaker 1>The Vikings were destroyed at national television by DeAndre Swift,

1:05:17.400 --> 1:05:19.000
<v Speaker 1>so I think there's a perception out there that they're

1:05:19.040 --> 1:05:23.120
<v Speaker 1>really bad against the run. But non DeAndre Swift runners

1:05:23.640 --> 1:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>are averaging two point eight yards per carry, and the

1:05:26.480 --> 1:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Vikings are giving up just sixty four rushing yards per

1:05:29.360 --> 1:05:33.680
<v Speaker 1>game to non DeAndre Swift runners, which extrapolated across the

1:05:33.680 --> 1:05:35.760
<v Speaker 1>whole league would be second best in the league. So

1:05:35.800 --> 1:05:37.880
<v Speaker 1>it's actually a pretty decent run defense.

1:05:38.040 --> 1:05:40.960
<v Speaker 6>And the Eagles offensive line, it's ridiculous, they're so proby

1:05:41.040 --> 1:05:44.080
<v Speaker 6>the best in the NFL, probably run blocking at least.

1:05:44.160 --> 1:05:46.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm only giving forman the c grade here. I think

1:05:46.240 --> 1:05:48.520
<v Speaker 1>points are coming a lot in different ways, and the

1:05:48.560 --> 1:05:51.360
<v Speaker 1>Vikings run defense is good in their past defense isn't

1:05:53.360 --> 1:05:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to the Saints taking on the Texans. Brian

1:05:58.720 --> 1:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Chris Olave had a nice bounce back game last week.

1:06:02.840 --> 1:06:05.360
<v Speaker 1>What do you think about Chris o'lave this week against

1:06:05.440 --> 1:06:07.920
<v Speaker 1>a surprisingly tough Texan secondary.

1:06:08.440 --> 1:06:09.040
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I'm not.

1:06:09.040 --> 1:06:12.160
<v Speaker 6>Liking Olave a whole lot this week. I'm not gonna

1:06:12.160 --> 1:06:14.880
<v Speaker 6>bene them, but just to see for Olave, who is

1:06:14.880 --> 1:06:17.520
<v Speaker 6>dealing with a toe injury, but he should play a

1:06:17.560 --> 1:06:21.320
<v Speaker 6>bad matchup though Houston has allowed the eleventh fewest perceptions,

1:06:21.360 --> 1:06:24.960
<v Speaker 6>the fifth fewest yards, and just one wide receiver touchdown

1:06:25.360 --> 1:06:28.640
<v Speaker 6>all season. Houston cornerback Stephen Nelson has only allowed twelve

1:06:28.680 --> 1:06:30.800
<v Speaker 6>catches on the season and no more than fifty three

1:06:30.840 --> 1:06:33.240
<v Speaker 6>yards in a game. And it's a long shot, but

1:06:33.320 --> 1:06:36.280
<v Speaker 6>Houston could get cornerback Derek Stingley back, who only allowed

1:06:36.320 --> 1:06:38.560
<v Speaker 6>too soon okay receptions in his first two games of

1:06:38.560 --> 1:06:38.880
<v Speaker 6>the season.

1:06:38.960 --> 1:06:40.720
<v Speaker 4>That's TBD. You got to monitor that.

1:06:40.760 --> 1:06:43.000
<v Speaker 6>But if he comes back, I'm still starting to olive,

1:06:43.120 --> 1:06:44.200
<v Speaker 6>but I like him a whole lot less.

1:06:44.240 --> 1:06:46.760
<v Speaker 4>But either way, just to see for Olave.

1:06:46.560 --> 1:06:49.680
<v Speaker 6>But I have Michael Thomas Rashid Shaheed on the bench

1:06:49.680 --> 1:06:52.960
<v Speaker 6>for this one as our tight ends. Taysom Hill, well,

1:06:53.000 --> 1:06:55.760
<v Speaker 6>depending on what sight you're playing on, I'll call Taysom

1:06:55.840 --> 1:06:58.040
<v Speaker 6>Hill a tight end and Juwan Johnson if he even

1:06:58.040 --> 1:07:00.000
<v Speaker 6>makes his return this week, they're on the bench.

1:07:00.400 --> 1:07:02.040
<v Speaker 4>As is Derek Carr.

1:07:02.480 --> 1:07:04.760
<v Speaker 6>Carr has in top two hundred passing yards and three

1:07:04.800 --> 1:07:07.560
<v Speaker 6>straight games and is total just three touchdowns during that

1:07:07.640 --> 1:07:10.480
<v Speaker 6>same span. On the other side, By the way.

1:07:10.880 --> 1:07:14.960
<v Speaker 1>As a quick note, some of us mentioned this repeatedly

1:07:15.000 --> 1:07:18.360
<v Speaker 1>in the preseason. Derek Carr not really an upgrade over

1:07:18.400 --> 1:07:21.800
<v Speaker 1>Andy Dalton at quarterback. In fact, we talked about that

1:07:21.840 --> 1:07:23.800
<v Speaker 1>as a lateral move that might have been generous.

1:07:23.880 --> 1:07:27.200
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we call him emo Andy Dalton. Derek Carr.

1:07:27.280 --> 1:07:31.640
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, Texans three passing touchdowns allowed all season, just two

1:07:31.720 --> 1:07:34.720
<v Speaker 6>hundred and twenty nine passing yards per game by opposing quarterbacks.

1:07:34.720 --> 1:07:37.840
<v Speaker 6>So Carr on the bench, but Alvin Kamara not on

1:07:37.880 --> 1:07:38.280
<v Speaker 6>the bench?

1:07:38.320 --> 1:07:40.760
<v Speaker 4>What year is it? Because he's getting a.

1:07:41.080 --> 1:07:44.920
<v Speaker 6>Oh A for Alvin Kamara averaging nearly twenty five touches

1:07:44.960 --> 1:07:47.800
<v Speaker 6>per game over the last two weeks. That's the highest

1:07:47.840 --> 1:07:50.080
<v Speaker 6>clip in the league among running backs. During that span,

1:07:50.560 --> 1:07:53.040
<v Speaker 6>the Texans are yielding more than twenty eight touches to

1:07:53.080 --> 1:07:55.680
<v Speaker 6>opposing backs for more than one hundred and twenty five

1:07:55.720 --> 1:07:58.600
<v Speaker 6>combo yards and a full touchdown per game. So, with

1:07:58.680 --> 1:08:00.920
<v Speaker 6>Jamal Williams still on IR, I got an a on

1:08:00.960 --> 1:08:03.360
<v Speaker 6>Alvin Kamara, and if you're really desperate, I'll throw a

1:08:03.360 --> 1:08:06.800
<v Speaker 6>segar at Kendre Miller, who had sixteen touches, four catches

1:08:06.880 --> 1:08:09.120
<v Speaker 6>for them being catches for fifty three yards. Granted it

1:08:09.160 --> 1:08:11.280
<v Speaker 6>was a blowout win at New England, but if you're

1:08:11.280 --> 1:08:14.480
<v Speaker 6>desperate for running back, Kendre Miller is startable against a

1:08:14.560 --> 1:08:18.080
<v Speaker 6>Texans defense that is funneling their opposition to the run

1:08:18.560 --> 1:08:22.200
<v Speaker 6>over to the Texans side on offense, starting with Damian Pierce.

1:08:22.479 --> 1:08:25.360
<v Speaker 6>Another brutal matchup for Pierce. It's not entirely his fault.

1:08:25.400 --> 1:08:29.360
<v Speaker 6>He's been dealing with a banged up offensive line. Awful matchups.

1:08:29.520 --> 1:08:32.200
<v Speaker 1>They have the offensive line ranks dead last and run

1:08:32.240 --> 1:08:34.320
<v Speaker 1>blocking by Pro Football Focus.

1:08:34.560 --> 1:08:37.720
<v Speaker 6>They should be getting back left tackle Laramie Tunzel the

1:08:37.760 --> 1:08:40.519
<v Speaker 6>Texans that is. That will certainly help, but even so,

1:08:41.439 --> 1:08:44.639
<v Speaker 6>again an awful matchup for Pierce. The Saints are allowing

1:08:44.720 --> 1:08:47.599
<v Speaker 6>just ninety six combo yards per game to running backs

1:08:47.840 --> 1:08:51.080
<v Speaker 6>and they haven't surrendered a score to the position all season.

1:08:51.160 --> 1:08:54.200
<v Speaker 6>So just to see on Pierce float this bad matchup

1:08:54.200 --> 1:08:57.000
<v Speaker 6>by the Pierce manager and that he has a bye

1:08:57.080 --> 1:08:59.760
<v Speaker 6>next week, and try to buy a low because the

1:08:59.800 --> 1:09:03.040
<v Speaker 6>Sedle softens up big time after the Texans by in

1:09:03.080 --> 1:09:03.599
<v Speaker 6>week seven.

1:09:03.720 --> 1:09:05.599
<v Speaker 1>I need it because I got Damian Pierce all over

1:09:05.640 --> 1:09:06.719
<v Speaker 1>the place, as you can imagine.

1:09:06.760 --> 1:09:07.320
<v Speaker 4>I'm sure you do.

1:09:07.439 --> 1:09:09.879
<v Speaker 6>I do as well. So we'll root for that soft schedule.

1:09:10.080 --> 1:09:13.160
<v Speaker 6>It's starting in week eight. Nico Collins Robert Woods can

1:09:13.200 --> 1:09:15.280
<v Speaker 6>give them both a ce. Tank Dell has been ruled

1:09:15.280 --> 1:09:18.240
<v Speaker 6>out with the concussion. Scott, you had a concussion stat

1:09:18.240 --> 1:09:19.080
<v Speaker 6>I don't think you've mentioned it.

1:09:19.080 --> 1:09:20.280
<v Speaker 4>I think it's worth worthwhile.

1:09:20.320 --> 1:09:22.960
<v Speaker 2>No, oh yeah, I looked it up with Kincaid and Russian.

1:09:23.000 --> 1:09:26.799
<v Speaker 2>Johnson's obviously out now, but out of the sixteen players

1:09:26.840 --> 1:09:30.760
<v Speaker 2>that have had concussions, fourteen of them missed the next game.

1:09:31.120 --> 1:09:33.479
<v Speaker 2>The protocols have been tightened since the two of things

1:09:33.560 --> 1:09:36.640
<v Speaker 2>last week, only two have come back. So if you

1:09:36.680 --> 1:09:39.120
<v Speaker 2>see a player going out with the concussion, assume they're

1:09:39.120 --> 1:09:40.400
<v Speaker 2>almost assume that they're.

1:09:40.320 --> 1:09:41.280
<v Speaker 5>Going to miss the next week.

1:09:41.680 --> 1:09:43.080
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's good stuff right there.

1:09:43.120 --> 1:09:45.280
<v Speaker 6>So Tank Dell ruled out, so there will be more

1:09:45.320 --> 1:09:47.000
<v Speaker 6>looks for Collins and Robert Woods.

1:09:47.280 --> 1:09:50.400
<v Speaker 4>Woods should play. He's dealing with a I.

1:09:50.479 --> 1:09:52.479
<v Speaker 6>Believe a rib injury of his own, like t Higgins,

1:09:52.520 --> 1:09:54.560
<v Speaker 6>but he should be suited up for this one. But

1:09:54.600 --> 1:09:57.120
<v Speaker 6>it's a bad matchup. New Orleans allowing just one hundred

1:09:57.120 --> 1:09:59.439
<v Speaker 6>and forty three yards and less than a touchdown per

1:09:59.520 --> 1:10:01.640
<v Speaker 6>game to why receivers as a whole, So just a

1:10:01.720 --> 1:10:04.439
<v Speaker 6>see for Nico Collins and Robert Woods. I have Dalton

1:10:04.520 --> 1:10:07.640
<v Speaker 6>Schultz on the bench. He went off last week, but

1:10:07.760 --> 1:10:09.479
<v Speaker 6>this is a bad spot against the Saints, who have

1:10:09.560 --> 1:10:12.759
<v Speaker 6>allowed eleven catches, ninety nine yards and a touchdown to tight.

1:10:12.720 --> 1:10:14.200
<v Speaker 4>Ends all season.

1:10:14.479 --> 1:10:14.719
<v Speaker 3>Wow.

1:10:15.000 --> 1:10:17.320
<v Speaker 6>Luke Musgrave was the only tight end to top twenty

1:10:17.400 --> 1:10:20.080
<v Speaker 6>yards against New Orleans. But he is the fastest player

1:10:20.120 --> 1:10:22.560
<v Speaker 6>on the Packers. I don't think Dalton Schultz is the

1:10:22.600 --> 1:10:23.200
<v Speaker 6>fastest player.

1:10:23.320 --> 1:10:25.240
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, twenty yards is nothing. That is

1:10:25.280 --> 1:10:26.479
<v Speaker 1>a very low threshold.

1:10:26.560 --> 1:10:27.840
<v Speaker 6>Oh it's a very low play. I think he had

1:10:27.880 --> 1:10:29.439
<v Speaker 6>like forty nine yards, so he actually had a decent

1:10:29.479 --> 1:10:31.800
<v Speaker 6>game musk Grave. But anyway, Schultz is on the bench

1:10:32.160 --> 1:10:34.360
<v Speaker 6>and I was close to Benching CJ. Stroud, I do

1:10:34.479 --> 1:10:36.240
<v Speaker 6>not like his receivers a whole lot. I will give

1:10:36.320 --> 1:10:39.120
<v Speaker 6>him a see, even though the Saints are ranked the

1:10:39.240 --> 1:10:41.760
<v Speaker 6>sixth against the pass by Pro Football Focus and the

1:10:41.880 --> 1:10:46.599
<v Speaker 6>only second lowest opponent completion percentage at fifty seven percent.

1:10:47.240 --> 1:10:49.040
<v Speaker 6>But you know what else has not been great? The

1:10:49.080 --> 1:10:52.400
<v Speaker 6>opposing quarterbacks to face the Saints. We're talking Ryan Tannehill,

1:10:52.920 --> 1:10:56.960
<v Speaker 6>Bryce Young, Jordan Love, Baker Mayfield, who actually had a

1:10:57.000 --> 1:10:59.639
<v Speaker 6>great game. He had three touchdowns, yes, and then Mac

1:10:59.720 --> 1:11:03.160
<v Speaker 6>Jones Bailey's appy last week. So Baker Bakyfield the only

1:11:03.240 --> 1:11:06.960
<v Speaker 6>competent quarterback the Saints have faced, and c. J. Stroud

1:11:07.040 --> 1:11:09.559
<v Speaker 6>certainly certainly looks more than competent, So I will give

1:11:09.640 --> 1:11:10.400
<v Speaker 6>him a ce.

1:11:10.600 --> 1:11:11.880
<v Speaker 4>But it's a pretty soft one.

1:11:12.720 --> 1:11:15.320
<v Speaker 1>Scott Carter is taking on the Rams. I already mentioned

1:11:15.400 --> 1:11:17.559
<v Speaker 1>Josh Dobbs was my take a chance, I mean quarterback.

1:11:17.640 --> 1:11:20.519
<v Speaker 5>No, I think you mentioned to Mary Dear Marcotta was

1:11:20.560 --> 1:11:21.240
<v Speaker 5>your running back.

1:11:22.160 --> 1:11:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Both I got Bobbs was your quarterback. I was Baby's

1:11:25.680 --> 1:11:29.280
<v Speaker 1>by quarterback. Oh man, So yeah, I like Josh Dobbs.

1:11:29.320 --> 1:11:30.600
<v Speaker 1>What do you think of his receivers?

1:11:31.200 --> 1:11:34.000
<v Speaker 5>The only one I actually have a grade on is. Oh, no,

1:11:34.160 --> 1:11:35.960
<v Speaker 5>that's not true. I would do. I do true.

1:11:36.000 --> 1:11:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Grand's got a lit of Mike Wilson in there.

1:11:37.640 --> 1:11:41.519
<v Speaker 2>I nope, nopeh Marquise Brown. I do have a B

1:11:41.640 --> 1:11:44.200
<v Speaker 2>grade on He's averaging five for sixty eight over the

1:11:44.280 --> 1:11:47.160
<v Speaker 2>last four and scored three times. He's been over fifty

1:11:47.240 --> 1:11:49.200
<v Speaker 2>yards in all four. If you're getting fifty yards and

1:11:49.240 --> 1:11:51.320
<v Speaker 2>you're getting four catches and all that, you're at nine

1:11:51.360 --> 1:11:53.840
<v Speaker 2>points right there, right, and it's a decent spot.

1:11:54.520 --> 1:11:57.800
<v Speaker 5>Brown will run about excuse me.

1:11:57.960 --> 1:12:00.559
<v Speaker 2>Brown runs about eighty one percent of his route against

1:12:00.920 --> 1:12:04.160
<v Speaker 2>the spot where Akila Witherspoon is. It's a not a

1:12:04.200 --> 1:12:07.400
<v Speaker 2>great matchup forty point nine percent catch right, thirty six

1:12:07.479 --> 1:12:08.639
<v Speaker 2>point seven passer ratings.

1:12:08.640 --> 1:12:09.080
<v Speaker 5>So I can't.

1:12:09.160 --> 1:12:11.920
<v Speaker 2>I can't give him an A. That's if he moves around,

1:12:12.000 --> 1:12:13.960
<v Speaker 2>he might get a better matchup. But B is the

1:12:14.200 --> 1:12:16.479
<v Speaker 2>absolute best I can give him. I might even take

1:12:16.520 --> 1:12:18.080
<v Speaker 2>it down to a sea bit it's a good enough matchup.

1:12:18.120 --> 1:12:20.600
<v Speaker 2>I'll give him a B. The C grade is not

1:12:20.760 --> 1:12:23.400
<v Speaker 2>going to Michael Wilson, who's had a few good games,

1:12:23.439 --> 1:12:25.679
<v Speaker 2>but he's got a pretty tough matchup in the outside.

1:12:25.720 --> 1:12:29.160
<v Speaker 2>It's going to Ronde Moore slot Rams allowed the ninth

1:12:29.240 --> 1:12:32.880
<v Speaker 2>most of the slot, but mostly with Connor out, Rondel

1:12:32.960 --> 1:12:34.080
<v Speaker 2>Moore is getting carries.

1:12:34.160 --> 1:12:37.240
<v Speaker 5>He's getting deebo volume. He's getting three to four carries.

1:12:38.120 --> 1:12:40.639
<v Speaker 1>He's spilled like a toothpick. Why is he getting carries?

1:12:40.800 --> 1:12:42.519
<v Speaker 5>I don't tell him. I don't know. I think they

1:12:42.680 --> 1:12:46.280
<v Speaker 5>just like him on stretch runs and jet sweeps and fourteen.

1:12:45.960 --> 1:12:48.120
<v Speaker 6>Point five yards per carry for Rondell Moore.

1:12:48.280 --> 1:12:51.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah carries, yeah, yeah, if he's gonna get three four

1:12:51.400 --> 1:12:54.680
<v Speaker 2>five carries, now that Josh, now that Connor is completely out.

1:12:54.840 --> 1:12:56.760
<v Speaker 2>If he's gonna get three four five carries and he's

1:12:56.760 --> 1:12:59.760
<v Speaker 2>going to get a few targets, it's a It's enough

1:13:00.600 --> 1:13:02.760
<v Speaker 2>in a matchup against in the slot that I like.

1:13:02.840 --> 1:13:04.920
<v Speaker 5>I'm giving him a C grade. It's probably more of

1:13:04.920 --> 1:13:05.839
<v Speaker 5>a dart throw, honestly.

1:13:06.600 --> 1:13:09.840
<v Speaker 2>Zach Ertz, I got a B grade on fifth best

1:13:09.960 --> 1:13:12.280
<v Speaker 2>matchup for tight ends. Three scores allowed in just the

1:13:12.360 --> 1:13:16.240
<v Speaker 2>last two weeks, including god Its explosion last week. He

1:13:16.479 --> 1:13:20.519
<v Speaker 2>leads the team in red zone targets. Yeah, B grade

1:13:20.560 --> 1:13:23.839
<v Speaker 2>on zach Ertz. Over to the Rams side, Matthew Stafford

1:13:23.960 --> 1:13:26.880
<v Speaker 2>was might take a chance on me quarterback? Yep, I

1:13:27.240 --> 1:13:30.080
<v Speaker 2>like Puka Nikoua with an A grade. Do I need

1:13:30.160 --> 1:13:33.080
<v Speaker 2>to talk about Puka and Cup? I will say in

1:13:33.160 --> 1:13:35.760
<v Speaker 2>a game Stafford only through thirty seven times, which was

1:13:35.840 --> 1:13:37.240
<v Speaker 2>his second lowest mark of the season.

1:13:37.600 --> 1:13:38.000
<v Speaker 1>Last week.

1:13:38.160 --> 1:13:40.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Cup and Nikoua each had ten plus targets. Those

1:13:41.000 --> 1:13:43.519
<v Speaker 2>two combined for sixty two percent of the targets.

1:13:43.560 --> 1:13:45.640
<v Speaker 1>Genious about two to two out. Well, you know who

1:13:45.760 --> 1:13:48.439
<v Speaker 1>was absolutely fantasy viable up time on the bench. I

1:13:48.800 --> 1:13:50.280
<v Speaker 1>think I think the runs over for him.

1:13:50.400 --> 1:13:50.599
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

1:13:50.680 --> 1:13:52.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, Cards are allowing third most to the slot where

1:13:53.000 --> 1:13:57.320
<v Speaker 2>Puka and Cups switch off two two out. Well, just

1:13:57.400 --> 1:13:59.320
<v Speaker 2>two catches on nine yards. I got him back on

1:13:59.360 --> 1:14:02.320
<v Speaker 2>the last week in that return for Cup on the bench,

1:14:03.240 --> 1:14:05.200
<v Speaker 2>Tyler Higby, I got on the bench too. They held

1:14:05.280 --> 1:14:06.400
<v Speaker 2>Kittle to nine yards.

1:14:06.640 --> 1:14:08.559
<v Speaker 1>Yeah that's not great's Oh.

1:14:08.520 --> 1:14:12.360
<v Speaker 2>Wait, Kien Williams real quick converted for a five from

1:14:12.479 --> 1:14:15.839
<v Speaker 2>inside the five I mentioned earlier in the year. According

1:14:15.840 --> 1:14:18.519
<v Speaker 2>to next Gen stats, Kyed Williams is the only back

1:14:18.560 --> 1:14:21.080
<v Speaker 2>with at least thirty tempts to not have faced the

1:14:21.160 --> 1:14:24.920
<v Speaker 2>name box. But he's getting all the volume. Fifth worst

1:14:25.000 --> 1:14:28.800
<v Speaker 2>rush yards over expectation, but all the volume I'm giving

1:14:28.840 --> 1:14:30.800
<v Speaker 2>the volume. C I could be talked into a bee

1:14:30.840 --> 1:14:32.280
<v Speaker 2>bit a volume C for Kien Williams.

1:14:32.400 --> 1:14:34.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's not a great player, but at the

1:14:34.560 --> 1:14:38.800
<v Speaker 1>opportunity is absolutely great for Kyron Williams. Yeah, your opportunity

1:14:39.000 --> 1:14:41.120
<v Speaker 1>to look like a genius is coming up next because

1:14:41.120 --> 1:14:43.599
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna give you a bunch of players that you'll

1:14:43.600 --> 1:14:45.360
<v Speaker 1>want to pick up this week that everybody else is

1:14:45.400 --> 1:14:47.479
<v Speaker 1>going to try to pick up next week, and they're

1:14:47.479 --> 1:14:50.080
<v Speaker 1>already on your roster, and you're gonna look and feel

1:14:50.120 --> 1:15:13.040
<v Speaker 1>brilliant when we return to Fantasy Football Weekly. Final segment

1:15:13.080 --> 1:15:17.519
<v Speaker 1>of Fantasy Football Weekly for week number six. This is

1:15:17.560 --> 1:15:21.640
<v Speaker 1>a segment we call premature speculation. We give you a

1:15:21.680 --> 1:15:23.479
<v Speaker 1>player you want to pick up this week. Let other

1:15:23.520 --> 1:15:25.720
<v Speaker 1>people be trying to bring up down the road, but

1:15:25.800 --> 1:15:27.799
<v Speaker 1>you've already got him, Scott Fish.

1:15:28.000 --> 1:15:31.040
<v Speaker 2>You know what, you already gave a C letter starting

1:15:31.120 --> 1:15:33.000
<v Speaker 2>grade to the guy I was gonna go with. Who's

1:15:33.040 --> 1:15:35.800
<v Speaker 2>that Darnell Mooney. I think he's got a great match

1:15:35.880 --> 1:15:39.040
<v Speaker 2>up here against Minnesota. Next week he gets a decent

1:15:39.160 --> 1:15:43.679
<v Speaker 2>slot match up, you know, bottom twelve Raiders against the slot. Okay,

1:15:43.960 --> 1:15:45.920
<v Speaker 2>and then the week after that he gets the Chargers,

1:15:45.960 --> 1:15:48.519
<v Speaker 2>who are just as bad as Minnesota defending the past

1:15:48.760 --> 1:15:50.519
<v Speaker 2>he's got. You know, I don't know that I love

1:15:50.640 --> 1:15:52.800
<v Speaker 2>Darnell for the full season, but it's a good three

1:15:52.840 --> 1:15:55.040
<v Speaker 2>game stretch that might be flexworthy over buys.

1:15:55.160 --> 1:15:59.679
<v Speaker 1>All right, Brian, your premature speculation player.

1:16:00.000 --> 1:16:01.639
<v Speaker 6>I'm gonna give a two for a two for one.

1:16:01.800 --> 1:16:05.000
<v Speaker 6>I have running backs from Tampa Bay Sean Tucker and

1:16:05.200 --> 1:16:08.080
<v Speaker 6>from Cleveland Kareem Hunt, and the rational rationale is the

1:16:08.080 --> 1:16:10.320
<v Speaker 6>same for both. There's one guy ahead of each YEP,

1:16:10.400 --> 1:16:13.280
<v Speaker 6>and they could beat them on talent alone. If an

1:16:13.320 --> 1:16:14.840
<v Speaker 6>injury were to happen, we got you got a starting

1:16:14.920 --> 1:16:16.880
<v Speaker 6>running back in each case. And they both have had

1:16:16.920 --> 1:16:19.360
<v Speaker 6>their buy in week five, So moving forward, okay, they

1:16:19.400 --> 1:16:21.920
<v Speaker 6>could be a viable warm body, especially starting in week

1:16:22.000 --> 1:16:23.920
<v Speaker 6>seven when there are six teams on buy and everyone's

1:16:23.920 --> 1:16:24.920
<v Speaker 6>gonna be looking for running back.

1:16:24.960 --> 1:16:26.840
<v Speaker 4>So Sean Tucker and Kareem Hunt.

1:16:26.840 --> 1:16:29.799
<v Speaker 1>Neither one's done anything to this point, but it's about opportunity.

1:16:29.880 --> 1:16:31.360
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, they'll be out. They're available.

1:16:31.479 --> 1:16:33.519
<v Speaker 1>That's They're a warm body running back.

1:16:33.600 --> 1:16:35.400
<v Speaker 2>That's why I said Keaton Mitchell last week. I'm like,

1:16:36.200 --> 1:16:38.960
<v Speaker 2>you know, a running back behind some interfestion backs. Hopefully

1:16:39.000 --> 1:16:39.479
<v Speaker 2>they plan.

1:16:39.479 --> 1:16:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Home, all right, I've already mentioned Johnny Wood's name like

1:16:41.880 --> 1:16:43.679
<v Speaker 1>three times in this show, and he's an on ir

1:16:43.800 --> 1:16:47.560
<v Speaker 1>for Pete's sake. But it's a hamstring injury suffered in OTAs.

1:16:47.720 --> 1:16:50.439
<v Speaker 1>For the love of God, this thing to timetable. It

1:16:50.560 --> 1:16:51.800
<v Speaker 1>should be coming back soon.

1:16:51.960 --> 1:16:54.400
<v Speaker 5>Find someone who loves you as much as Church loves july.

1:16:54.360 --> 1:16:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Ts not possible. Colts tight Ends without him right now

1:16:57.800 --> 1:17:00.599
<v Speaker 1>are averaging eight targets sixty two yards per game. They've

1:17:00.640 --> 1:17:02.960
<v Speaker 1>scored in three out of five games. And that's the

1:17:03.160 --> 1:17:08.719
<v Speaker 1>likes of Kyle Granson and Andrew Ogletree and Moe Ali

1:17:08.880 --> 1:17:13.479
<v Speaker 1>Cox Jelohnny Woods is six foot seven, two hundred and

1:17:13.600 --> 1:17:18.000
<v Speaker 1>sixty pounds. Last year he averaged thirteen yards per receptions

1:17:18.040 --> 1:17:20.840
<v Speaker 1>and five yards after the catch. The dude is a

1:17:20.920 --> 1:17:25.479
<v Speaker 1>freaking beast, an insane athletic specimen. He's rangy. He gets

1:17:25.560 --> 1:17:29.439
<v Speaker 1>opened downfield, so much more talent than Moe Ali Cox

1:17:29.600 --> 1:17:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Granson at some point, and I can only hope

1:17:32.880 --> 1:17:35.040
<v Speaker 1>it sooner rather than later. Johnny Wood's going to make

1:17:35.040 --> 1:17:38.400
<v Speaker 1>an impact at a position everybody needs help at tight end.

1:17:38.600 --> 1:17:41.240
<v Speaker 1>I love it all right, Let's go back to our matchups.

1:17:41.720 --> 1:17:45.800
<v Speaker 1>Eagles taking on the Jets. DeAndre Swift has entered into

1:17:46.040 --> 1:17:51.479
<v Speaker 1>obvious a territory does not need any more really, I

1:17:51.560 --> 1:17:54.160
<v Speaker 1>think discussion than that, except I'm going to mention this.

1:17:54.680 --> 1:17:56.479
<v Speaker 1>It's coming off a game where we just had six

1:17:56.600 --> 1:17:59.880
<v Speaker 1>receptions and the Jets are giving up the most reception

1:18:00.200 --> 1:18:02.439
<v Speaker 1>and the second most receiving yards to runners. So he's

1:18:02.439 --> 1:18:04.639
<v Speaker 1>going to help you two different ways. For Deandres Swift,

1:18:05.000 --> 1:18:08.160
<v Speaker 1>let's go to the receivers. AJ Brown B grade in

1:18:08.240 --> 1:18:11.479
<v Speaker 1>a tricky matchup, but he's red hot with over one

1:18:11.600 --> 1:18:14.600
<v Speaker 1>hundred and twenty five yards in three straight games. On

1:18:15.320 --> 1:18:18.799
<v Speaker 1>one half of the field, the Jets have Sauce Gardner,

1:18:18.840 --> 1:18:21.400
<v Speaker 1>a top ten Pro Football Focus coverage corner. On the

1:18:21.479 --> 1:18:24.160
<v Speaker 1>other side, they have DJ Reid, who's expected to clear

1:18:24.200 --> 1:18:27.240
<v Speaker 1>the concussion protocol by Sunday. Reid is not quite at

1:18:27.280 --> 1:18:29.320
<v Speaker 1>saut Gartner's level, but he's still very good, and he

1:18:29.360 --> 1:18:33.679
<v Speaker 1>has allowed a touchdown in nine straight games nine times

1:18:33.840 --> 1:18:36.080
<v Speaker 1>going back to last year, the Jets have allowed the

1:18:36.280 --> 1:18:40.080
<v Speaker 1>second fewest wide receiver yards and the fewest touchdowns to wideouts.

1:18:40.479 --> 1:18:45.240
<v Speaker 1>So AJ Brown just the B grade DeVonta Smith C grade.

1:18:45.600 --> 1:18:48.559
<v Speaker 1>He's got the same difficult matchup as AJ Brown against

1:18:48.560 --> 1:18:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Sauce Gardner and DJ Reid, depending which side of the

1:18:50.600 --> 1:18:53.240
<v Speaker 1>field you're on. But he just gets less volume than Brown,

1:18:53.240 --> 1:18:55.920
<v Speaker 1>at least in recent weeks, unless they're going to try

1:18:56.000 --> 1:18:58.320
<v Speaker 1>to force feed Smith to make up for the fact

1:18:58.360 --> 1:19:00.920
<v Speaker 1>that AJ Brown's dominating right now and he's getting he's

1:19:00.960 --> 1:19:03.240
<v Speaker 1>been kind of iced out of his own offense. So

1:19:03.320 --> 1:19:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I've only got the C grade on Smith. You could

1:19:05.320 --> 1:19:07.200
<v Speaker 1>convince me to go B, but I'm gonna go see

1:19:08.160 --> 1:19:11.400
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Goddard B grade, you know, because those outside corners.

1:19:11.439 --> 1:19:14.000
<v Speaker 1>So the Jets are so good. Some teams attack New

1:19:14.120 --> 1:19:16.600
<v Speaker 1>York with the tight end. The Jets have given up

1:19:16.680 --> 1:19:20.400
<v Speaker 1>five touchdowns to five different tight ends, and they've given

1:19:20.479 --> 1:19:23.519
<v Speaker 1>up the tenth most receptions ninth most yards to tight ends.

1:19:24.000 --> 1:19:26.240
<v Speaker 1>The Jets us linebacker Quincy Williams for some of their

1:19:26.280 --> 1:19:29.080
<v Speaker 1>tight end coverage, and he's very good. He's his second

1:19:29.160 --> 1:19:33.040
<v Speaker 1>most pass breakups at the linebacker position. B grade for

1:19:33.200 --> 1:19:35.400
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Goddard coming off the best game of his season.

1:19:36.000 --> 1:19:39.080
<v Speaker 1>So I've given you some little A stuff for DeAndre

1:19:39.160 --> 1:19:41.719
<v Speaker 1>Swift through the air and some b's and some c's.

1:19:42.320 --> 1:19:45.160
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Hurts comes out with a B grade. Tough matchup

1:19:45.200 --> 1:19:48.040
<v Speaker 1>against the defense. That's one game removed from putting Patrick

1:19:48.120 --> 1:19:51.040
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes on two hundred three yards and one touchdown.

1:19:51.160 --> 1:19:51.479
<v Speaker 6>That's it.

1:19:52.520 --> 1:19:55.960
<v Speaker 1>Opposing quarterbacks averaging just two hundred and eighteen yards and

1:19:56.240 --> 1:19:59.479
<v Speaker 1>just over one touchdown per game against New York. They're

1:19:59.479 --> 1:20:04.640
<v Speaker 1>averaging as quarterback twenty against the Jets, no quarterback has

1:20:04.720 --> 1:20:06.800
<v Speaker 1>rushed for a touchdown, but they did give up six

1:20:06.920 --> 1:20:10.280
<v Speaker 1>rushing touchdowns to quarterbacks last year, and Mahomes and Russell

1:20:10.280 --> 1:20:12.599
<v Speaker 1>Wilson combined for one hundred rushing yards against them over

1:20:12.640 --> 1:20:14.880
<v Speaker 1>the last two weeks. So I like Jalen Hurts on

1:20:14.920 --> 1:20:16.600
<v Speaker 1>the ground enough to make up for the fact that

1:20:16.680 --> 1:20:19.840
<v Speaker 1>this could be a tricky passing game. The B grade

1:20:19.960 --> 1:20:23.160
<v Speaker 1>for Jalen Hurts Jets side, there's only two guys that

1:20:23.200 --> 1:20:26.040
<v Speaker 1>you care about. This team did not get it done

1:20:26.080 --> 1:20:32.960
<v Speaker 1>against Denver last week, so well one guy did, Price Alid, Yeah,

1:20:33.600 --> 1:20:35.840
<v Speaker 1>it was under the C grade here. He has assumed

1:20:35.880 --> 1:20:38.000
<v Speaker 1>full control of the snapcount, with Dalvin Cook down to

1:20:38.120 --> 1:20:41.280
<v Speaker 1>just seventeen percent of the snaps last week. Billy go

1:20:41.880 --> 1:20:45.960
<v Speaker 1>brutal matchup, allowing the fewest fantasy points to running backs,

1:20:46.240 --> 1:20:49.280
<v Speaker 1>including just one touchdown to running backs all year. No

1:20:49.479 --> 1:20:53.800
<v Speaker 1>back has topped fifty three yards against Philadelphia, and since

1:20:53.840 --> 1:20:57.920
<v Speaker 1>the opener Runners are averaging just fifteen receiving yards per game,

1:20:58.200 --> 1:21:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Philly ranks number two run stuff win rate. There's nothing

1:21:03.320 --> 1:21:06.120
<v Speaker 1>to like about this matchup for Breese Hall except volume

1:21:06.200 --> 1:21:09.960
<v Speaker 1>and ability C grade. And then there's Garrett Wilson. I

1:21:10.000 --> 1:21:11.919
<v Speaker 1>was tempted to put him on the bench, but fortunately

1:21:12.520 --> 1:21:17.000
<v Speaker 1>Eagles best cornerback Darius Slay is out, so that normally

1:21:17.160 --> 1:21:22.120
<v Speaker 1>Slay shadows the opposing best receiver in many games. Now

1:21:22.320 --> 1:21:27.320
<v Speaker 1>that might be James Bradbury, who's good, just not as good. Still,

1:21:27.520 --> 1:21:30.360
<v Speaker 1>you gotta have significant worry about Zach Wilson getting anything

1:21:30.439 --> 1:21:33.559
<v Speaker 1>done against the Eagles. Eagles have the sixth best pass

1:21:33.680 --> 1:21:36.599
<v Speaker 1>rush win rate and the seventh best pass rush ranking

1:21:36.680 --> 1:21:39.639
<v Speaker 1>by Pro Football Focus. No Jalen Carter in this game, though,

1:21:39.640 --> 1:21:41.280
<v Speaker 1>and that's a bit of a loss to the pass rush.

1:21:41.600 --> 1:21:43.720
<v Speaker 1>Garrett Wilson's so good he could turn any catch into

1:21:43.760 --> 1:21:46.280
<v Speaker 1>a big play, so he remains startable. But this is

1:21:46.360 --> 1:21:49.280
<v Speaker 1>one of the toughest matchups of Garrett Wilson's year.

1:21:50.439 --> 1:21:50.960
<v Speaker 4>Let's go to the.

1:21:50.960 --> 1:21:53.639
<v Speaker 1>Sunday night game that is the Giants. Speaking on the Bills.

1:21:53.720 --> 1:21:56.599
<v Speaker 1>There are basically no giants left standing for this game.

1:21:56.800 --> 1:21:59.640
<v Speaker 2>Yep, exactly, Tyra Taylor is gonna get the start. But

1:21:59.760 --> 1:22:02.320
<v Speaker 2>this is a matchup for the passing game. Fourth toughest

1:22:02.439 --> 1:22:05.640
<v Speaker 2>against quarterbacks, got tough against wide receivers as well. You

1:22:05.680 --> 1:22:08.639
<v Speaker 2>wouldn't start any giants wide receivers anyway. You're not gonna

1:22:08.680 --> 1:22:11.760
<v Speaker 2>start Taylor anyway. But is there anyone he might start?

1:22:12.200 --> 1:22:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Maybe Darren Waller if he even plays in. If he plays,

1:22:15.280 --> 1:22:17.320
<v Speaker 1>he's shaping up as a game time decision on a

1:22:17.520 --> 1:22:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Sunday night.

1:22:18.439 --> 1:22:20.880
<v Speaker 5>Exactly. I have a bench grade on him.

1:22:20.880 --> 1:22:24.719
<v Speaker 2>If you think, if there's better news coming out before

1:22:25.360 --> 1:22:28.719
<v Speaker 2>you know, before your Sunday morning lineups, you could slot

1:22:28.800 --> 1:22:31.280
<v Speaker 2>him in. It's a tough matchup the Bills allowing thirty

1:22:31.360 --> 1:22:33.880
<v Speaker 2>one scoreless yards to tight ends. But last week he

1:22:33.960 --> 1:22:36.760
<v Speaker 2>got eleven targets, was used all over, was used in motion,

1:22:37.040 --> 1:22:40.479
<v Speaker 2>used even on a screen. They were really really getting

1:22:40.560 --> 1:22:43.599
<v Speaker 2>him involved in thirty three percent of Taylor's targets when

1:22:43.640 --> 1:22:46.240
<v Speaker 2>he came in went to Waller. Okay, so in a

1:22:46.320 --> 1:22:48.920
<v Speaker 2>game they should be behind. If you get better news

1:22:49.000 --> 1:22:51.479
<v Speaker 2>before Sunday, I'd bump him up to a sky but

1:22:51.680 --> 1:22:54.599
<v Speaker 2>with the news we have right now, probably a bench grade.

1:22:54.640 --> 1:22:57.320
<v Speaker 1>Giants are gonna be missing three offensive linemen in this game.

1:22:57.560 --> 1:23:01.320
<v Speaker 2>Saquon Barkley is the same deal, a deal three offensive

1:23:01.360 --> 1:23:04.000
<v Speaker 2>linemen out. I have a bench grade on him. But

1:23:04.360 --> 1:23:06.560
<v Speaker 2>if we hear better that he is going to go,

1:23:06.640 --> 1:23:09.080
<v Speaker 2>and it sounded like he might go, but I would

1:23:09.080 --> 1:23:11.559
<v Speaker 2>give him a C grade. But reminder that a few

1:23:11.640 --> 1:23:13.200
<v Speaker 2>years ago he missed a bunch of games on an

1:23:13.200 --> 1:23:15.840
<v Speaker 2>ankle injury, came back. Here is the ardage totals after

1:23:15.960 --> 1:23:18.200
<v Speaker 2>coming back from that injury dealing with it. That's not

1:23:18.360 --> 1:23:19.360
<v Speaker 2>good twenty.

1:23:19.120 --> 1:23:21.679
<v Speaker 5>Five forty fifty five sixty four fifty.

1:23:21.960 --> 1:23:24.240
<v Speaker 2>He did add three to six catches per game, which

1:23:24.320 --> 1:23:26.320
<v Speaker 2>kept him in a nice sea level. Would you added,

1:23:26.800 --> 1:23:29.120
<v Speaker 2>you know, three catches for thirty yards on top of it?

1:23:29.600 --> 1:23:33.120
<v Speaker 2>It's for sure sea level. And Travis CTN just rolled

1:23:33.240 --> 1:23:34.599
<v Speaker 2>over the Bills like a tank.

1:23:35.520 --> 1:23:36.040
<v Speaker 5>Like a tank.

1:23:38.560 --> 1:23:41.479
<v Speaker 2>Devin a Devon a Chan destroyed them the week before.

1:23:41.600 --> 1:23:45.360
<v Speaker 2>Breest All also a major game against the Bills, So

1:23:45.479 --> 1:23:48.040
<v Speaker 2>there is a chance. But if even if Barkley doesn't go,

1:23:48.120 --> 1:23:51.040
<v Speaker 2>you don't want Gray or brid splitting carries anyway. Now

1:23:51.280 --> 1:23:54.320
<v Speaker 2>on the Buffalo side, I think Josh Allen and uh

1:23:54.479 --> 1:23:57.600
<v Speaker 2>Stefan Diggs are obvious a's at this point, so we

1:23:57.720 --> 1:24:00.519
<v Speaker 2>will move on to Gabe Davis, who has six catches

1:24:00.600 --> 1:24:04.840
<v Speaker 2>over twenty yards one over forty yards in his five games,

1:24:04.920 --> 1:24:10.920
<v Speaker 2>and he's scored in four straight games. Get this, Get

1:24:11.000 --> 1:24:14.559
<v Speaker 2>this gave on Gabe Davis. He's gonna get Trey Hawkins,

1:24:14.600 --> 1:24:17.679
<v Speaker 2>who allows a one hundred and fifty eight point three

1:24:17.840 --> 1:24:19.880
<v Speaker 2>passer rating against him at home.

1:24:20.200 --> 1:24:23.960
<v Speaker 5>That's perfect. That's a perfect rating, and say one fifty

1:24:23.960 --> 1:24:25.320
<v Speaker 5>eight point three on the road.

1:24:26.000 --> 1:24:29.519
<v Speaker 2>Both both happening here beyond Gabe Davis, and that's and

1:24:29.800 --> 1:24:32.760
<v Speaker 2>over to James Cook for the run game C grade,

1:24:32.880 --> 1:24:35.800
<v Speaker 2>highest snap percentage, the percentage of the year last week,

1:24:36.120 --> 1:24:39.560
<v Speaker 2>averaging fifteen touches per game. He's going to get the

1:24:39.640 --> 1:24:42.280
<v Speaker 2>volume C against the Giants team allowing five point three

1:24:42.360 --> 1:24:44.920
<v Speaker 2>yards per carry. I'm not trusting Murray or Harris. They

1:24:44.960 --> 1:24:47.360
<v Speaker 2>need a touchdown to get in there. It is a

1:24:47.400 --> 1:24:49.000
<v Speaker 2>good game though, good game script for them.

1:24:49.320 --> 1:24:51.479
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys taking on the Chargers, Brian.

1:24:51.960 --> 1:24:54.200
<v Speaker 6>I'll start with the Cowboys side. Tony Poter gets a B.

1:24:54.280 --> 1:24:56.639
<v Speaker 6>I'm a little worried about this shoulder injury. You should play,

1:24:56.720 --> 1:24:58.960
<v Speaker 6>but they might limit his workload. A great matchup though,

1:24:59.040 --> 1:25:01.679
<v Speaker 6>the Chargers allowing one hundred and forty seven combo yards

1:25:02.000 --> 1:25:04.240
<v Speaker 6>per game to running backs. That's why Rico Dowdell was

1:25:04.280 --> 1:25:06.760
<v Speaker 6>might take a chance on me running back over a

1:25:06.840 --> 1:25:09.439
<v Speaker 6>CD lamb. He gets an A. He's the squeaky wheel

1:25:09.479 --> 1:25:11.240
<v Speaker 6>of the week. He's been upset with his usage and

1:25:11.280 --> 1:25:14.160
<v Speaker 6>he should be. CD is averaging three point three yards

1:25:14.200 --> 1:25:17.040
<v Speaker 6>of separation when targeted, that's fifth best, but he's not

1:25:17.080 --> 1:25:19.560
<v Speaker 6>seeing the ten to twelve targets he needs. Hopefully that

1:25:19.720 --> 1:25:22.360
<v Speaker 6>change is against the Chargers, who are allowing fifteen catches

1:25:22.680 --> 1:25:24.680
<v Speaker 6>two hundred and thirty two yards at one point five

1:25:24.760 --> 1:25:28.360
<v Speaker 6>touchdowns per game to opposing wide receivers. That's why Michael

1:25:28.400 --> 1:25:30.799
<v Speaker 6>Gallup was, might take a chance on me wide receiver.

1:25:30.880 --> 1:25:33.000
<v Speaker 6>I was attempted to go to Brandon Cook's so he's

1:25:33.120 --> 1:25:35.840
<v Speaker 6>been invisible. So he's still on the bench even in

1:25:35.880 --> 1:25:38.679
<v Speaker 6>a shootout scenario. But Jake Ferguson not on the bench.

1:25:38.760 --> 1:25:41.200
<v Speaker 6>He gets an A. His route share has gone up

1:25:41.400 --> 1:25:44.559
<v Speaker 6>in four straight games, from forty percent to fifty eight percent,

1:25:45.040 --> 1:25:48.320
<v Speaker 6>sixty two percent to seventy three percent. Last week, he

1:25:48.479 --> 1:25:51.360
<v Speaker 6>leads Dallas and targets per route run and is tied

1:25:51.439 --> 1:25:53.960
<v Speaker 6>for second among all tight ends in that metric. The

1:25:54.080 --> 1:25:56.160
<v Speaker 6>Chargers haven't faced much when it comes to tight ends,

1:25:56.240 --> 1:25:59.439
<v Speaker 6>with TJ. Hockinson and Josh Oliver combined for ten catches,

1:25:59.479 --> 1:26:02.240
<v Speaker 6>eighty two yard and a touchdown against them in Week three.

1:26:03.120 --> 1:26:04.920
<v Speaker 6>So Dak Prescott he gets an A based on all

1:26:04.960 --> 1:26:08.200
<v Speaker 6>these starting grades for his receivers. Over to the Chargers

1:26:08.280 --> 1:26:10.880
<v Speaker 6>side B for Austin Eckler, who should make his return.

1:26:11.160 --> 1:26:13.760
<v Speaker 6>The Cowboys have surrendered four touchdowns to running backs over

1:26:13.800 --> 1:26:16.320
<v Speaker 6>the last three weeks, and they allowed six catches to

1:26:16.520 --> 1:26:18.519
<v Speaker 6>forty nine Ers backs last week.

1:26:19.000 --> 1:26:20.200
<v Speaker 4>Keenan Allen gets an A.

1:26:20.520 --> 1:26:23.360
<v Speaker 6>With Trayvon Diggs out, the Cowboys secondary is nothing to

1:26:23.439 --> 1:26:26.160
<v Speaker 6>be scared of. So you're obviously starting Keenan Allen, a

1:26:26.240 --> 1:26:29.200
<v Speaker 6>top five wide receiver right now. Sure, I'm also starting

1:26:29.560 --> 1:26:32.040
<v Speaker 6>both Josh Palmer and Quenton Johnson.

1:26:31.680 --> 1:26:33.439
<v Speaker 1>In the show Wow Johnston.

1:26:33.600 --> 1:26:35.400
<v Speaker 6>I like Josh Palmer a little more, but I think

1:26:35.439 --> 1:26:38.479
<v Speaker 6>Quentin Johnson He's sitting on a breakout game one of

1:26:38.560 --> 1:26:40.519
<v Speaker 6>these days, and this is a great spot for it

1:26:40.640 --> 1:26:43.439
<v Speaker 6>to happen. He'll see plenty of double coverage against a

1:26:43.520 --> 1:26:47.400
<v Speaker 6>secondary that is in shambles without Trayvon Diggs. And lastly,

1:26:47.720 --> 1:26:51.000
<v Speaker 6>for the pass catchers Gerald Everard and Donald Parham.

1:26:50.960 --> 1:26:54.439
<v Speaker 4>Here we go, both get a c A. As a whole.

1:26:54.640 --> 1:26:57.719
<v Speaker 6>Chargers tight ends are Averjagts five catches in fifty yards

1:26:57.760 --> 1:27:00.479
<v Speaker 6>per game, and despite having their buy all Edie, they

1:27:00.520 --> 1:27:03.559
<v Speaker 6>have the second most tight end touchdowns. But all those

1:27:03.640 --> 1:27:07.120
<v Speaker 6>touchdowns have gone to Parhum. Not my boy Gerald Everett,

1:27:07.160 --> 1:27:09.760
<v Speaker 6>but he's still the starting tight end. George Kittle just

1:27:09.800 --> 1:27:13.920
<v Speaker 6>scored thrice on the Cowboys. So if you're desperate, I

1:27:14.000 --> 1:27:18.360
<v Speaker 6>think you're desperate, you start Parham. But safety on Gerald

1:27:18.400 --> 1:27:21.400
<v Speaker 6>Everett and of course a very safe A on justin

1:27:21.840 --> 1:27:26.280
<v Speaker 6>air Bear Herbert again Trayvon Diggs on the shelf. The

1:27:26.320 --> 1:27:30.080
<v Speaker 6>Cowboys just lost linebacker Layton vander ash to injured. Reserve

1:27:30.439 --> 1:27:34.320
<v Speaker 6>defensive tackle Neville Gallimore is questionable to play, as his

1:27:34.439 --> 1:27:39.360
<v Speaker 6>linebacker Dumone Clark and safety juan Ye Thomas. A shootout

1:27:39.520 --> 1:27:41.479
<v Speaker 6>it's gonna happen on Monday Night, the only game with

1:27:41.520 --> 1:27:44.519
<v Speaker 6>an over under north of fifty points on the slate

1:27:44.720 --> 1:27:45.599
<v Speaker 6>or all weekend.

1:27:45.720 --> 1:27:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I like it well done. Parum completely off the injured

1:27:48.840 --> 1:27:52.040
<v Speaker 1>part practice in full right to have him back oft injured.

1:27:52.160 --> 1:27:56.800
<v Speaker 1>But we love the athleticism, the size, the talent. Yeah yeah,

1:27:57.400 --> 1:27:59.679
<v Speaker 1>If you want to join a brand new, fresh Guillotine league,

1:27:59.680 --> 1:28:01.439
<v Speaker 1>you can do that. We'd love to have you play

1:28:01.840 --> 1:28:04.880
<v Speaker 1>new leagues forming now thirteen weeks left in the season.

1:28:04.960 --> 1:28:06.920
<v Speaker 1>That's a lot of fun to be had between now

1:28:07.000 --> 1:28:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and January. You know how it works. The bottom team

1:28:09.800 --> 1:28:12.200
<v Speaker 1>gets cut every week and the rest of us feast

1:28:12.360 --> 1:28:15.559
<v Speaker 1>on the roster of the dead. It's so much fun,

1:28:15.720 --> 1:28:18.800
<v Speaker 1>all the strategy. When great players hit the waiver wire,

1:28:19.000 --> 1:28:21.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a blast. You'll love Guillotine Leagues dot com. And

1:28:21.840 --> 1:28:24.360
<v Speaker 1>if you missed any part of this show and you

1:28:24.479 --> 1:28:26.679
<v Speaker 1>want to go back and check all our player ratings

1:28:27.040 --> 1:28:29.240
<v Speaker 1>available for free Guillotine leagues dot com. You don't have

1:28:29.240 --> 1:28:31.200
<v Speaker 1>to even play in a Guillotine league. The get the

1:28:31.240 --> 1:28:34.439
<v Speaker 1>player ratings rankings for free Guillotine leagues dot com. Best

1:28:34.479 --> 1:28:37.120
<v Speaker 1>of luck this week, everybody duck you next week. Cobine

1:28:41.720 --> 1:28:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football Weekly is a production of iHeartRadio. For more

1:28:45.320 --> 1:28:49.400
<v Speaker 1>podcasts from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or

1:28:49.439 --> 1:28:51.280
<v Speaker 1>wherever you listen to your favorite shows.