WEBVTT - The Inaugural Episode 

0:00:15.396 --> 0:00:24.396
<v Speaker 1>Pushkin from Pushkin Industries. This is Deep Background, the show

0:00:24.396 --> 0:00:27.956
<v Speaker 1>where we explore the stories behind the stories in the news.

0:00:28.436 --> 0:00:32.196
<v Speaker 1>I'm Noah Feldman. This episode comes at the end of

0:00:32.196 --> 0:00:36.836
<v Speaker 1>one of the most tumultuous presidencies in US history, and

0:00:37.156 --> 0:00:40.836
<v Speaker 1>this episode is coming out on January twentieth, the day

0:00:40.876 --> 0:00:43.876
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump will leave the White House and Joe Biden

0:00:43.996 --> 0:00:46.836
<v Speaker 1>will become the forty sixth President of the United States.

0:00:47.756 --> 0:00:50.476
<v Speaker 1>This episode also comes at the beginning of a new

0:00:50.596 --> 0:00:54.156
<v Speaker 1>season here on Deep Background. This year on the show

0:00:54.396 --> 0:00:58.316
<v Speaker 1>will be exploring the theme of power. Who has it,

0:00:58.836 --> 0:01:01.916
<v Speaker 1>how do they get it, who doesn't have it? And why?

0:01:02.236 --> 0:01:06.276
<v Speaker 1>How has power used? What is power in different realms?

0:01:06.996 --> 0:01:11.276
<v Speaker 1>And how does power shape events. Over the course of

0:01:11.276 --> 0:01:15.596
<v Speaker 1>the year, we'll be discussing many forms of power, well

0:01:15.676 --> 0:01:20.396
<v Speaker 1>beyond the strictly legal or political or constitution. To start

0:01:20.436 --> 0:01:23.516
<v Speaker 1>off this new season, given the January sixth attack on

0:01:23.636 --> 0:01:27.796
<v Speaker 1>Congress and Trump's second impeachment, We're going to talk today

0:01:28.116 --> 0:01:32.676
<v Speaker 1>about how power functions in the presence. To discuss this,

0:01:32.876 --> 0:01:36.436
<v Speaker 1>I'm joined by Professor Douglas Brinkley. He's a professor at

0:01:36.476 --> 0:01:40.036
<v Speaker 1>Rice University, the official US presidential historian of the new

0:01:40.076 --> 0:01:43.796
<v Speaker 1>York Historical Society, a contributor to CNN, and a best

0:01:43.836 --> 0:01:47.996
<v Speaker 1>selling author whose most recent book is American Moonshop. John F.

0:01:48.116 --> 0:01:51.756
<v Speaker 1>Kennedy and the Great Space Race. Doug, thank you so

0:01:51.836 --> 0:01:58.316
<v Speaker 1>much for being here today. Let's begin with the capital

0:01:58.396 --> 0:02:03.956
<v Speaker 1>storming on January sixth. There's no immediate precedent for an

0:02:03.956 --> 0:02:07.196
<v Speaker 1>event like this. My mind immediately went to the moment

0:02:07.276 --> 0:02:09.276
<v Speaker 1>in the War of eighteen twelve when the capital was

0:02:09.316 --> 0:02:12.996
<v Speaker 1>actually burned, but that was by a battle hardened force

0:02:13.196 --> 0:02:17.836
<v Speaker 1>of British regulars who swept away the state militias who

0:02:17.996 --> 0:02:20.476
<v Speaker 1>briefly tried to block them at Bladensburg, So it's a

0:02:20.476 --> 0:02:23.316
<v Speaker 1>pretty different scenario. What did it call to your mind

0:02:23.596 --> 0:02:26.516
<v Speaker 1>when you try to think about this bizarre event, an

0:02:26.556 --> 0:02:30.516
<v Speaker 1>upsetting event in historical context. Well, no, I immediately did

0:02:30.556 --> 0:02:33.556
<v Speaker 1>what you did. I pulled back and thought, gosh, what's

0:02:33.596 --> 0:02:35.716
<v Speaker 1>going on here? And I did think for a minute

0:02:35.716 --> 0:02:39.036
<v Speaker 1>about the War of eighteen twelve, and I did recall

0:02:39.196 --> 0:02:42.516
<v Speaker 1>when Washington was attacked during nine to eleven, and our

0:02:42.596 --> 0:02:46.116
<v Speaker 1>Pentagogue was hit, and the Capitol had been a target,

0:02:46.196 --> 0:02:49.796
<v Speaker 1>and I remember scares of anthrax and the like, with

0:02:49.836 --> 0:02:53.676
<v Speaker 1>some people running out of building but they were kind

0:02:53.716 --> 0:02:56.796
<v Speaker 1>of frivolous comparisons. I mean here, the fact of the

0:02:56.836 --> 0:03:01.716
<v Speaker 1>matter was a group of our fellows, citizens mob were

0:03:01.756 --> 0:03:06.276
<v Speaker 1>going in and destroying the US capital on a hunt

0:03:06.836 --> 0:03:09.276
<v Speaker 1>for the Speaker of the House and the Vice Press,

0:03:09.596 --> 0:03:14.436
<v Speaker 1>with ostensibly the order to hang them or do something

0:03:14.516 --> 0:03:19.156
<v Speaker 1>horrible to them. That was unprecedented, and that, to me

0:03:19.316 --> 0:03:22.636
<v Speaker 1>is a day that will live in infamy. January sixth

0:03:22.796 --> 0:03:26.276
<v Speaker 1>is not to be forgotten. Likely, just like we have

0:03:26.316 --> 0:03:29.716
<v Speaker 1>a nine to eleven museum in New York City, there

0:03:29.756 --> 0:03:32.796
<v Speaker 1>will be a museum by the capital to talk about

0:03:32.796 --> 0:03:37.276
<v Speaker 1>what happened in that day when the insurruction occurred, and

0:03:37.316 --> 0:03:40.436
<v Speaker 1>so I thought it to be an extremely frightening day

0:03:40.516 --> 0:03:44.076
<v Speaker 1>for our democracy. That's a fascinating idea of a museum

0:03:44.276 --> 0:03:47.236
<v Speaker 1>or an exhibit even in a museum, to commemorate those events.

0:03:47.236 --> 0:03:49.156
<v Speaker 1>And it leads me to a question that I've been

0:03:49.196 --> 0:03:51.236
<v Speaker 1>really puzzling over and I don't feel I have a

0:03:51.236 --> 0:03:54.396
<v Speaker 1>good answer to it, and that is, will we achieve

0:03:54.516 --> 0:03:58.676
<v Speaker 1>the kind of consensus on the meaning of those events

0:03:58.716 --> 0:04:02.116
<v Speaker 1>over time that is usually the precondition for some kind

0:04:02.156 --> 0:04:05.476
<v Speaker 1>of a public recognition in the form of a museum

0:04:05.676 --> 0:04:08.596
<v Speaker 1>or a monument, because there is an impulse now to say, well, look,

0:04:09.116 --> 0:04:11.516
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump was the president, he spoke to this crowd

0:04:11.636 --> 0:04:15.836
<v Speaker 1>before they stormed the capitol. He's been impeached under an

0:04:15.876 --> 0:04:20.716
<v Speaker 1>article of impeachment that accused him of inciting insurrection. Those

0:04:20.756 --> 0:04:24.236
<v Speaker 1>are two major words, incitement and insurrection. They're both invoked there.

0:04:24.516 --> 0:04:27.396
<v Speaker 1>And all of that is of course partisan in some

0:04:27.516 --> 0:04:31.156
<v Speaker 1>powerful way. For us to get to a place where

0:04:31.196 --> 0:04:33.556
<v Speaker 1>we say, you know, let's memorialize this would probably would

0:04:33.556 --> 0:04:36.116
<v Speaker 1>be necessary to think of this as an outlying event

0:04:36.396 --> 0:04:39.836
<v Speaker 1>that wasn't closely associated with one of the two major

0:04:39.916 --> 0:04:43.476
<v Speaker 1>political parties. Oh, excellent point, and that's actually why I

0:04:43.636 --> 0:04:46.676
<v Speaker 1>mentioned it. I think that day will come, you know,

0:04:46.716 --> 0:04:48.956
<v Speaker 1>I think the country will unite that this was a

0:04:48.996 --> 0:04:53.196
<v Speaker 1>really rotten thing that occurred, the insurrection. But I don't

0:04:53.236 --> 0:04:56.676
<v Speaker 1>think it's a date that's easily forgotten to select. In

0:04:56.836 --> 0:05:01.796
<v Speaker 1>April twenty fifth, when the Oklahoma City was bombed. Well,

0:05:01.836 --> 0:05:04.916
<v Speaker 1>in Oklahoma City, they have a beautiful museum there. They

0:05:04.916 --> 0:05:07.996
<v Speaker 1>have the empty chairs of all the dead, and they

0:05:08.076 --> 0:05:12.356
<v Speaker 1>explain that event of Timothy McVeigh and right wing extremism

0:05:12.436 --> 0:05:17.636
<v Speaker 1>quite well. It's a marvelously curated museum. That's an Oklahoma.

0:05:17.836 --> 0:05:20.476
<v Speaker 1>This is in our nation's capital, where all the school

0:05:20.556 --> 0:05:24.036
<v Speaker 1>kids come, where everybody goes to visit to study democracy.

0:05:24.516 --> 0:05:26.956
<v Speaker 1>So this is going to be, I think, studied like

0:05:27.076 --> 0:05:31.116
<v Speaker 1>Ford's Theater where where Lincoln was killed, as an anti site,

0:05:31.116 --> 0:05:35.196
<v Speaker 1>a site where something went terribly wrong with our democracy.

0:05:35.996 --> 0:05:39.196
<v Speaker 1>Your comparison to the Oklahoma City bombing is really an

0:05:39.236 --> 0:05:41.476
<v Speaker 1>important one. I was lucky enough to have on the

0:05:41.516 --> 0:05:44.996
<v Speaker 1>program professor Kathleen Bellew from University of Chicago in the

0:05:45.036 --> 0:05:47.876
<v Speaker 1>history department there, who works on the white supremacy movement,

0:05:48.316 --> 0:05:51.916
<v Speaker 1>and she treats the McVeigh bombing in Oklahoma City as

0:05:51.916 --> 0:05:54.356
<v Speaker 1>a central event in the history of that movement. And

0:05:54.436 --> 0:05:58.596
<v Speaker 1>she's been saying recently that she sees the capital attack

0:05:58.716 --> 0:06:02.476
<v Speaker 1>as itself a manifestation of what is essentially the same movement.

0:06:02.796 --> 0:06:04.396
<v Speaker 1>And I think to the extent that we do come

0:06:04.436 --> 0:06:06.596
<v Speaker 1>to see it that way, you're going to be proven

0:06:06.676 --> 0:06:10.916
<v Speaker 1>right that we can peripheralize the events of that day.

0:06:11.076 --> 0:06:14.716
<v Speaker 1>The question that I have is what about the denial

0:06:15.116 --> 0:06:19.116
<v Speaker 1>of the legitimacy of the twenty twenty election results that

0:06:19.316 --> 0:06:23.396
<v Speaker 1>was closely associated with the attack. That goes way beyond

0:06:23.996 --> 0:06:27.156
<v Speaker 1>the people who attacked the Capitol Right now, these numbers

0:06:27.156 --> 0:06:29.396
<v Speaker 1>will change, but right now close to seventy percent of

0:06:29.436 --> 0:06:33.556
<v Speaker 1>Republicans are telling posters that they believe that the twenty

0:06:33.596 --> 0:06:37.276
<v Speaker 1>twenty election was illegitimate, and that too is going to

0:06:37.356 --> 0:06:40.396
<v Speaker 1>have to be assimilated into the historical record in some way.

0:06:40.396 --> 0:06:42.836
<v Speaker 1>In fact, that's a dispute about the very facts of

0:06:42.876 --> 0:06:45.436
<v Speaker 1>the historical record. You know, who won the election. How

0:06:45.476 --> 0:06:49.996
<v Speaker 1>do you anticipate that structure I would call it a

0:06:50.036 --> 0:06:53.556
<v Speaker 1>structure of denial will work itself out over time. Well,

0:06:53.556 --> 0:06:55.756
<v Speaker 1>it is a structure of denial, and that's a perfect

0:06:55.836 --> 0:06:59.396
<v Speaker 1>way to put it. Noah, I worry about it. I

0:06:59.516 --> 0:07:02.116
<v Speaker 1>have a feeling that there will be a lot of

0:07:02.156 --> 0:07:06.836
<v Speaker 1>those people that will admit that the January sixth insurrection was,

0:07:07.396 --> 0:07:10.276
<v Speaker 1>you know, shouldn't have happened. That it was a cantful

0:07:10.316 --> 0:07:15.196
<v Speaker 1>of real zealots that were responsible. It didn't represent the

0:07:15.196 --> 0:07:18.556
<v Speaker 1>Trump movement or the seventy million plus people that voted

0:07:18.636 --> 0:07:21.476
<v Speaker 1>for Trump. But when you had that high a number,

0:07:21.476 --> 0:07:25.716
<v Speaker 1>who thinks the election of twenty twenty was rigged? That

0:07:25.796 --> 0:07:29.916
<v Speaker 1>really is a reprogramming or re education process. I don't

0:07:29.956 --> 0:07:33.036
<v Speaker 1>know where to begin on that. All I can tell

0:07:33.116 --> 0:07:36.156
<v Speaker 1>you is that twenty twenty was a model of how

0:07:36.156 --> 0:07:40.036
<v Speaker 1>a free and fair election should be run. We ran

0:07:40.156 --> 0:07:43.796
<v Speaker 1>a great election in twenty twenty. And why it disturbs

0:07:43.876 --> 0:07:46.356
<v Speaker 1>me is I see that as one of our great exports.

0:07:46.916 --> 0:07:49.796
<v Speaker 1>The American brand is all about we know how to

0:07:49.876 --> 0:07:53.836
<v Speaker 1>do free and fair elections. It's why Jimmy Carter's ex

0:07:53.916 --> 0:07:57.516
<v Speaker 1>president could go to Nicaragua or go to Panama and

0:07:57.596 --> 0:08:00.396
<v Speaker 1>say I'm a former American president and I'll be judged

0:08:00.396 --> 0:08:03.116
<v Speaker 1>whether you did a free or fair one here. We've

0:08:03.636 --> 0:08:07.716
<v Speaker 1>made that our signature service for democracy in America. So

0:08:07.876 --> 0:08:10.436
<v Speaker 1>the challenge that we don't know how to count votes

0:08:11.196 --> 0:08:14.996
<v Speaker 1>is really a direct and central attack at the nervous

0:08:15.036 --> 0:08:20.236
<v Speaker 1>system of what makes our democratic body politique work. And

0:08:20.396 --> 0:08:24.316
<v Speaker 1>I hope more and more people will start dropping off

0:08:24.316 --> 0:08:30.556
<v Speaker 1>of that stance and recognizing they were hoodwinked by talk radio, internet,

0:08:30.676 --> 0:08:35.596
<v Speaker 1>post by hate sites, or just by a refusal to

0:08:35.636 --> 0:08:39.716
<v Speaker 1>accept that their team had lost that maybe over time

0:08:39.796 --> 0:08:42.756
<v Speaker 1>people will come to their senses, but there's always going

0:08:42.836 --> 0:08:46.396
<v Speaker 1>to be a twenty percent of the American public that

0:08:46.476 --> 0:08:51.036
<v Speaker 1>will always think that this was a fixed and rigged election.

0:08:51.116 --> 0:08:54.116
<v Speaker 1>And that's that twenty percent that Donald Trump will carry

0:08:54.436 --> 0:08:57.596
<v Speaker 1>around in his hip pocket even as ex president. Well,

0:08:57.596 --> 0:09:00.476
<v Speaker 1>speaking of Trump and carrying that twenty percent around and

0:09:00.596 --> 0:09:05.156
<v Speaker 1>its structure of denial. Trump's decision that he will not

0:09:05.236 --> 0:09:09.956
<v Speaker 1>attend the inauguration, I think, really underscores that he's trying

0:09:09.996 --> 0:09:13.476
<v Speaker 1>to say, not just I don't like Joe Biden, but

0:09:13.596 --> 0:09:16.716
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Joe Biden is genuinely the president of

0:09:16.756 --> 0:09:19.356
<v Speaker 1>the United States. I was trying to explain to my

0:09:19.436 --> 0:09:21.596
<v Speaker 1>kids why I thought it was such a big deal

0:09:21.636 --> 0:09:24.916
<v Speaker 1>for the president not to attend an inauguration, And I

0:09:24.916 --> 0:09:27.436
<v Speaker 1>tried to explain it hadn't happened since Andrew Johnson and

0:09:27.756 --> 0:09:30.236
<v Speaker 1>that it was a central symbol of transition. And they

0:09:30.276 --> 0:09:33.476
<v Speaker 1>looked at me. You know, they're fourteen and fifteen. They

0:09:33.476 --> 0:09:35.636
<v Speaker 1>look at me blankly a lot as if you know, Dad,

0:09:35.636 --> 0:09:37.036
<v Speaker 1>we don't know what you're talking about. And they just

0:09:37.036 --> 0:09:39.516
<v Speaker 1>said to me, Dad, why would you ever have expected

0:09:39.556 --> 0:09:43.476
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump, under any circumstances to attend the inauguration of

0:09:43.516 --> 0:09:45.876
<v Speaker 1>his success Right? That was a fair point that they made.

0:09:46.356 --> 0:09:48.876
<v Speaker 1>How do you think about that decision? Is it something

0:09:48.876 --> 0:09:51.876
<v Speaker 1>that will ultimately contribute to the delegitimation of the transition?

0:09:52.676 --> 0:09:55.556
<v Speaker 1>You know, I have a fourteen, fifteen, and sixteen year old.

0:09:55.636 --> 0:09:58.396
<v Speaker 1>I have three in high school right now, and they

0:09:58.396 --> 0:10:01.116
<v Speaker 1>would all say the exact same thing to me. They're

0:10:01.196 --> 0:10:03.276
<v Speaker 1>kind of on to the fact growing up. I think

0:10:03.276 --> 0:10:05.516
<v Speaker 1>in the age of Trump that you're never going to

0:10:05.596 --> 0:10:09.476
<v Speaker 1>have a sense of reconciliation. They grew up with neo

0:10:09.596 --> 0:10:13.276
<v Speaker 1>Civil War and they haven't experienced a healing moment that

0:10:13.676 --> 0:10:18.996
<v Speaker 1>we keep talking about. It's a tragedy at least. I

0:10:19.076 --> 0:10:21.596
<v Speaker 1>first thought it was that Trump wasn't coming to the

0:10:21.636 --> 0:10:25.436
<v Speaker 1>Biden inauguration because if he would have shook Biden's hand,

0:10:25.476 --> 0:10:29.716
<v Speaker 1>it would have symbolically been omitted as difficult as it

0:10:29.796 --> 0:10:33.996
<v Speaker 1>was for him that Biden and won. But after January sixth,

0:10:34.036 --> 0:10:37.476
<v Speaker 1>I say good riddance. I think Trump at the inaugural

0:10:37.556 --> 0:10:41.836
<v Speaker 1>would have been a distraction by not very forgiving of

0:10:41.956 --> 0:10:45.116
<v Speaker 1>Trump for January sixth, when you have five people that

0:10:45.196 --> 0:10:48.156
<v Speaker 1>are killed, and that you run a reign of terror

0:10:48.156 --> 0:10:53.196
<v Speaker 1>through our capital against our representatives and people having to

0:10:53.676 --> 0:10:58.556
<v Speaker 1>either catch COVID, have terror trauma, nightmare attacks, hiding in

0:10:59.036 --> 0:11:03.396
<v Speaker 1>closets and corners. You know. So I've been asked a lot,

0:11:03.596 --> 0:11:06.436
<v Speaker 1>as you can imagine. Noah from the press to talk

0:11:06.476 --> 0:11:09.836
<v Speaker 1>about why did John Adams not show? While for John

0:11:09.916 --> 0:11:13.716
<v Speaker 1>Quincy Adams or Andrew Johnson, the fact of the matter

0:11:13.916 --> 0:11:17.836
<v Speaker 1>was after the Civil War, when Andrew Johnson refused to

0:11:18.436 --> 0:11:22.156
<v Speaker 1>go to Grant's inaugural, He spent the inaugural in the

0:11:22.196 --> 0:11:26.956
<v Speaker 1>White House, claiming he was doing paperwork, desk work, and

0:11:27.036 --> 0:11:29.876
<v Speaker 1>so he was in Washington. He just refused to go.

0:11:30.516 --> 0:11:33.236
<v Speaker 1>It stuck a bone in the throat of the nation,

0:11:33.716 --> 0:11:37.116
<v Speaker 1>and we decided really collectively after that to make sure

0:11:37.196 --> 0:11:40.556
<v Speaker 1>that the president's there for the transition. I found that

0:11:40.876 --> 0:11:43.836
<v Speaker 1>moment of the transition sort of the crown jewel of

0:11:43.836 --> 0:11:49.956
<v Speaker 1>our democratic process. It's the coronation, which legitimizes all of

0:11:49.996 --> 0:11:54.596
<v Speaker 1>the mud slinging and debating and belittling and all the

0:11:54.756 --> 0:11:58.276
<v Speaker 1>ugly side of American politics. He suddenly get the reward

0:11:58.836 --> 0:12:03.316
<v Speaker 1>of the great hug, the great moment of friendship that

0:12:03.396 --> 0:12:06.876
<v Speaker 1>emerges out of two adversaries. We see this in every

0:12:06.956 --> 0:12:10.036
<v Speaker 1>sports game, right A team loses and then the coaches

0:12:10.116 --> 0:12:13.356
<v Speaker 1>go hug each other, players talk to each other. We

0:12:13.556 --> 0:12:17.516
<v Speaker 1>teach our young people to be good losers as well

0:12:17.556 --> 0:12:22.156
<v Speaker 1>as winners. But Trump's refusal just sets him apart as

0:12:22.196 --> 0:12:26.516
<v Speaker 1>a very small man, as somebody who's not well liked,

0:12:26.676 --> 0:12:31.036
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really have any personal friends, a loner in his

0:12:31.116 --> 0:12:35.636
<v Speaker 1>own way. And you probably not being on the inaugural

0:12:35.716 --> 0:12:38.316
<v Speaker 1>stage was a good thing at the end, because I

0:12:38.356 --> 0:12:40.916
<v Speaker 1>would have been looking for the blood on his hands

0:12:40.956 --> 0:12:43.796
<v Speaker 1>if he was standing there, I would have been feeling,

0:12:43.876 --> 0:12:47.396
<v Speaker 1>how dare you have the gall to even be here today?

0:12:47.876 --> 0:12:52.916
<v Speaker 1>I got that angry at Trump over January sixth, Doug.

0:12:53.236 --> 0:12:55.076
<v Speaker 1>One of the themes that I'm going to try to

0:12:55.116 --> 0:12:59.556
<v Speaker 1>explore in this new year is power and how it's created,

0:13:00.236 --> 0:13:04.236
<v Speaker 1>and how it weakens and how it grows. And I'm

0:13:04.276 --> 0:13:08.116
<v Speaker 1>wondering whether you think when you wear your historian of

0:13:08.156 --> 0:13:10.876
<v Speaker 1>the presidency had not just a starting of particular presidents,

0:13:10.916 --> 0:13:14.676
<v Speaker 1>but of the presidency as an institution. Whether Trump is

0:13:14.716 --> 0:13:19.836
<v Speaker 1>emerging from his presidency having strengthened the presidency as an institution,

0:13:20.596 --> 0:13:23.956
<v Speaker 1>partly through his ability to be a populist and gain

0:13:24.316 --> 0:13:26.716
<v Speaker 1>not the whole communities, but a substantial part of the

0:13:26.716 --> 0:13:30.436
<v Speaker 1>community's support for his conduct, or whether he's weakened the

0:13:30.436 --> 0:13:33.916
<v Speaker 1>presidency by especially the way he's leaving it, with the

0:13:33.956 --> 0:13:39.276
<v Speaker 1>association with the attack of January six with the sore losrism,

0:13:39.316 --> 0:13:41.756
<v Speaker 1>because I think a reasonable case could probably be made

0:13:41.756 --> 0:13:45.196
<v Speaker 1>in either direction. And I really wonder how you think

0:13:45.236 --> 0:13:46.916
<v Speaker 1>about it, And obviously we won't know for a long time,

0:13:46.916 --> 0:13:48.716
<v Speaker 1>but it's an interesting question to ask in real time.

0:13:48.956 --> 0:13:52.436
<v Speaker 1>It's a very interesting one, and I am of two

0:13:52.476 --> 0:13:55.996
<v Speaker 1>minds on it. You know, I've always been a promoter

0:13:56.116 --> 0:13:59.996
<v Speaker 1>of strong executive power because I write books like on

0:14:00.156 --> 0:14:05.036
<v Speaker 1>Theodore Rooseville. So when tr said to himself, if Lincoln

0:14:05.076 --> 0:14:09.356
<v Speaker 1>can use executive power to emancipate the slaves in the

0:14:09.396 --> 0:14:13.116
<v Speaker 1>Civil War, I certainly can use the executive power in

0:14:13.116 --> 0:14:16.836
<v Speaker 1>a vigorous way. And these incredible moments like when Theodore

0:14:16.876 --> 0:14:20.116
<v Speaker 1>Roosevelt stands on the lip of the Grand Canyon and says,

0:14:20.196 --> 0:14:22.756
<v Speaker 1>do not touch it. God has made it. You will

0:14:22.796 --> 0:14:27.196
<v Speaker 1>only marit. Leave the Grand Canyon alone and send it.

0:14:27.276 --> 0:14:30.076
<v Speaker 1>Wants to mine it for zinc, abstus and copper, and

0:14:30.276 --> 0:14:35.276
<v Speaker 1>Roosevelt uses executive power to declare it as a national monument,

0:14:35.756 --> 0:14:39.196
<v Speaker 1>which was really meant for sort of dinosaur bones or

0:14:39.276 --> 0:14:44.636
<v Speaker 1>antiquities pottery, like a five acre sites. He declares six

0:14:44.756 --> 0:14:48.516
<v Speaker 1>hundred thousand acres and today it's a million. So you

0:14:48.676 --> 0:14:52.076
<v Speaker 1>share executive power. We wouldn't half the Grand Canyon without

0:14:52.156 --> 0:14:55.796
<v Speaker 1>Theodore Roosevelt. And I can go through each president when

0:14:55.836 --> 0:15:00.276
<v Speaker 1>they have moments of executive power that are usually quite admirable.

0:15:00.436 --> 0:15:04.236
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Jimmy Carter are using executive power to pardon

0:15:04.796 --> 0:15:10.036
<v Speaker 1>Vietnam veterans, so called draft dodgers, to try to heal

0:15:10.076 --> 0:15:13.116
<v Speaker 1>the country, you know, as an executive power in a

0:15:13.276 --> 0:15:15.796
<v Speaker 1>sense of a pardon. That probably was the correct thing

0:15:15.836 --> 0:15:20.956
<v Speaker 1>to do. But I worry about executive power overreach. Like

0:15:21.076 --> 0:15:25.316
<v Speaker 1>look how many executive much executive power Barack Obama used

0:15:25.316 --> 0:15:29.356
<v Speaker 1>once plumbaxed after the Affordable Care Act, and then all

0:15:29.436 --> 0:15:34.116
<v Speaker 1>we saw as Trump sent four years undoing the executive

0:15:34.516 --> 0:15:37.996
<v Speaker 1>achievements of Obama. Now Biden is coming in. The first

0:15:37.996 --> 0:15:43.476
<v Speaker 1>thing he's doing is undoing Trump's executive decrees. So we're

0:15:43.556 --> 0:15:45.436
<v Speaker 1>kind of going to go back and forth to eat

0:15:45.516 --> 0:15:48.196
<v Speaker 1>up a lot of clock. In that way. I have

0:15:48.356 --> 0:15:52.636
<v Speaker 1>learned to appreciate Lyndon Johnson a little more. When Johnson

0:15:52.716 --> 0:15:55.756
<v Speaker 1>had opportunities for executive power on a lot of things,

0:15:55.756 --> 0:15:58.796
<v Speaker 1>he insisted to go through the Senate in Congress. But

0:15:58.876 --> 0:16:00.836
<v Speaker 1>it's easy to say that I'm going to build a

0:16:00.916 --> 0:16:04.876
<v Speaker 1>legislative record when you have an overwhelming percentage of the

0:16:04.996 --> 0:16:09.796
<v Speaker 1>party with you. Biden's operating on a fifty fifty basis

0:16:09.796 --> 0:16:12.756
<v Speaker 1>in the Senate, meaning it's just going to be really

0:16:12.796 --> 0:16:15.756
<v Speaker 1>hard on any vote for him. But so, I really

0:16:15.756 --> 0:16:17.796
<v Speaker 1>am not one of those people that have tried to

0:16:17.876 --> 0:16:22.316
<v Speaker 1>reign in presidential power up until Trump, and now I

0:16:22.436 --> 0:16:29.276
<v Speaker 1>see the real dangers of somebody who ignores or civic morays,

0:16:29.396 --> 0:16:33.636
<v Speaker 1>our sense of decency, who treats the legislative branch as

0:16:34.196 --> 0:16:39.196
<v Speaker 1>a whipping post, who abuses the judicial apartment. I think

0:16:39.276 --> 0:16:41.596
<v Speaker 1>now maybe the time right we have to figure out

0:16:41.636 --> 0:16:46.276
<v Speaker 1>how to curtail presidential power. For example, how do we

0:16:46.436 --> 0:16:52.636
<v Speaker 1>curtail this pardon power that has gone crazy Now has

0:16:52.676 --> 0:16:56.996
<v Speaker 1>nothing to do with justifying a judicial situation that had

0:16:57.036 --> 0:17:01.556
<v Speaker 1>gone badly. It's now just pardoning cronies and would be

0:17:01.956 --> 0:17:06.076
<v Speaker 1>personal friends that turned cons or criminals. And it's very

0:17:06.196 --> 0:17:09.516
<v Speaker 1>unseemly to be doing that at the end. And so

0:17:09.636 --> 0:17:12.116
<v Speaker 1>I think we might have to look at the twenty

0:17:12.116 --> 0:17:15.396
<v Speaker 1>fifth Amendment ANEW. When people called for the twenty fifth

0:17:15.436 --> 0:17:17.516
<v Speaker 1>Amendment to get rid of Trump, people said, well, it

0:17:17.556 --> 0:17:23.956
<v Speaker 1>doesn't apply, not really doable. Well, why the reason I

0:17:24.036 --> 0:17:25.956
<v Speaker 1>got when they said you can't use the twenty fifth.

0:17:25.956 --> 0:17:28.276
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't meant for that. It was done after John F.

0:17:28.436 --> 0:17:33.556
<v Speaker 1>Kennedy's death. And if it was just somebody was incapacitated, well,

0:17:33.996 --> 0:17:37.156
<v Speaker 1>in nineteen sixty seven when we passed the twenty fifth Amendment,

0:17:37.236 --> 0:17:41.796
<v Speaker 1>mental illness wasn't treated seriously. If you want to look

0:17:41.836 --> 0:17:44.876
<v Speaker 1>at books about what it was like to be treated

0:17:44.876 --> 0:17:50.556
<v Speaker 1>for mental illness in Georgia and Alabama, it is horrific. Now,

0:17:50.836 --> 0:17:54.556
<v Speaker 1>I think we all agree that Trump has some sort

0:17:54.556 --> 0:18:00.036
<v Speaker 1>of a narcissistic disorder malignant self love. We're all not

0:18:00.076 --> 0:18:04.116
<v Speaker 1>supposed to say so because we're not psychiatrist. But I

0:18:04.156 --> 0:18:07.356
<v Speaker 1>believe we had a very sick man operating in the

0:18:07.356 --> 0:18:10.716
<v Speaker 1>White House for the past couple of years, and his

0:18:10.876 --> 0:18:15.396
<v Speaker 1>behavior since the election warranted the twenty fifth Amendment to

0:18:15.436 --> 0:18:19.196
<v Speaker 1>be put into action. I would think somebody having losing

0:18:19.236 --> 0:18:23.756
<v Speaker 1>their sense of mind and inability to think rationally would

0:18:23.756 --> 0:18:26.516
<v Speaker 1>be a reason to evoke the twenty fifth. I just

0:18:26.556 --> 0:18:29.036
<v Speaker 1>want to push back gently on the twenty fifth Amendment.

0:18:29.076 --> 0:18:32.196
<v Speaker 1>There and here, I think I'm wearing my constitutionalist hat.

0:18:32.796 --> 0:18:36.196
<v Speaker 1>You know, the language of the amendment is unable to

0:18:36.396 --> 0:18:40.516
<v Speaker 1>discharge the duties of the office, right. It doesn't say

0:18:40.556 --> 0:18:43.876
<v Speaker 1>anything about diagnosis of mental disease or defect, which I

0:18:43.916 --> 0:18:47.836
<v Speaker 1>agree it has evolved tremendously since then. But unable is

0:18:47.876 --> 0:18:51.996
<v Speaker 1>as constitutional language goes pretty clear. And I don't think

0:18:52.076 --> 0:18:54.916
<v Speaker 1>that Donald Trump was unable to discharge the duties of

0:18:54.956 --> 0:18:57.276
<v Speaker 1>his office. He was unable to discharge them in a

0:18:57.276 --> 0:19:00.996
<v Speaker 1>way that I found satisfactory or that was morally acceptable.

0:19:01.436 --> 0:19:05.356
<v Speaker 1>So entirely apart from our attempts to make sense of

0:19:06.516 --> 0:19:08.836
<v Speaker 1>his psychological state, which as you say, is a challenging

0:19:08.876 --> 0:19:11.276
<v Speaker 1>thing to do from the outside, but you know, reasonable

0:19:11.356 --> 0:19:14.196
<v Speaker 1>judgments could certainly be made. I don't think the twenty

0:19:14.196 --> 0:19:17.916
<v Speaker 1>fifth Amendment says that if the president has a narcissistic

0:19:17.956 --> 0:19:22.076
<v Speaker 1>personality disorder, that that authorizes the removal of that president.

0:19:22.116 --> 0:19:25.956
<v Speaker 1>And I actually think that's a good thing, because presidents

0:19:26.156 --> 0:19:28.876
<v Speaker 1>should be removed if they've committed high crimes and misdemeanors.

0:19:28.876 --> 0:19:31.196
<v Speaker 1>In my view, this president did, and there were in

0:19:31.236 --> 0:19:33.116
<v Speaker 1>fact two attempts to remove him, or one and a

0:19:33.156 --> 0:19:35.436
<v Speaker 1>half if you count the last impeachment, which won't be

0:19:35.516 --> 0:19:37.796
<v Speaker 1>tried if it is tried, until after he's out of office.

0:19:38.236 --> 0:19:41.676
<v Speaker 1>But that's a political process that's kind of overt and

0:19:41.876 --> 0:19:45.036
<v Speaker 1>the twenty fifth Amendment to the extent that the president resisted,

0:19:45.076 --> 0:19:48.036
<v Speaker 1>it just sort of seems like a not as good

0:19:48.156 --> 0:19:51.476
<v Speaker 1>version of impeachment. Right, you would still need two thirds

0:19:51.516 --> 0:19:53.236
<v Speaker 1>of the House and two thirds of the Senate in

0:19:53.316 --> 0:19:56.956
<v Speaker 1>order to remove a president who insisted that he was

0:19:57.196 --> 0:20:00.396
<v Speaker 1>capable of discharging the duties of the office. So to me,

0:20:00.476 --> 0:20:02.556
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think that impeachment isn't doing what it

0:20:02.596 --> 0:20:06.196
<v Speaker 1>should do because of some lack of virtue on the

0:20:06.276 --> 0:20:09.476
<v Speaker 1>part of the Senate. But I wouldn't use the twenty

0:20:09.476 --> 0:20:11.996
<v Speaker 1>fifth Amendment as a stopgap to replace it. So I

0:20:11.996 --> 0:20:14.996
<v Speaker 1>wonder what that approach makes you think. I agree with

0:20:15.036 --> 0:20:17.276
<v Speaker 1>what you said about the twenty fifth. I just think

0:20:17.316 --> 0:20:19.956
<v Speaker 1>we were caught in a two week period here where

0:20:20.276 --> 0:20:25.396
<v Speaker 1>what if Trump started ordering federal troops to put down

0:20:25.676 --> 0:20:31.836
<v Speaker 1>protesters or use a nuclear weapon on Iran? What was

0:20:31.876 --> 0:20:35.236
<v Speaker 1>their way to curtail him? These would have been highly

0:20:35.276 --> 0:20:38.956
<v Speaker 1>irrational acts caused by his inability to admit that he

0:20:39.116 --> 0:20:43.436
<v Speaker 1>lost due to his narcissistic disorder, and we would have

0:20:43.636 --> 0:20:46.516
<v Speaker 1>no recourse because you wouldn't be able to get two

0:20:46.556 --> 0:20:48.596
<v Speaker 1>thirds of the Senate, and you can't do it in

0:20:48.756 --> 0:20:52.516
<v Speaker 1>time because there's only a couple of weeks left and

0:20:52.716 --> 0:20:56.236
<v Speaker 1>twenty fifth doesn't allow for it. So what you're saying

0:20:56.356 --> 0:20:59.476
<v Speaker 1>is you're just suck that last week or two. And

0:20:59.636 --> 0:21:01.716
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking that we need to find a way never

0:21:01.756 --> 0:21:05.156
<v Speaker 1>to be held hostage by an American president in the

0:21:05.236 --> 0:21:08.476
<v Speaker 1>last days of office, and we may need to think

0:21:08.836 --> 0:21:13.476
<v Speaker 1>more seriously of what is mental disorders at least have

0:21:13.636 --> 0:21:18.476
<v Speaker 1>a talk about what's new in science since nineteen sixty seven.

0:21:18.956 --> 0:21:21.796
<v Speaker 1>You know, if you have somebody is truly a sociopath

0:21:21.916 --> 0:21:24.636
<v Speaker 1>in the White House and the idea you can't remove

0:21:24.716 --> 0:21:29.476
<v Speaker 1>them with the twenty fifth and your only recourses impeachment, Well,

0:21:29.476 --> 0:21:31.516
<v Speaker 1>how do you do impeachment when you only have two

0:21:31.556 --> 0:21:36.556
<v Speaker 1>weeks left when that sociopath starts acting out. What I'm

0:21:36.556 --> 0:21:39.876
<v Speaker 1>most concerned is this limbo period we've been in right

0:21:39.916 --> 0:21:42.876
<v Speaker 1>now where our country is sort of held hostage to

0:21:42.916 --> 0:21:47.196
<v Speaker 1>his mental whims and fancies, and that to me was dangerous. Yeah,

0:21:47.236 --> 0:21:49.916
<v Speaker 1>that's an important comment on just the nature of the

0:21:49.956 --> 0:21:52.876
<v Speaker 1>tremendous power of the presidency, especially in the nuclear era,

0:21:53.476 --> 0:21:57.956
<v Speaker 1>where the president can just do tremendous damage. And what

0:21:57.956 --> 0:21:59.756
<v Speaker 1>you're saying, if I understand you correctly, is we don't

0:21:59.796 --> 0:22:02.916
<v Speaker 1>really have a good mechanism constitutionally for how to fix that,

0:22:02.956 --> 0:22:04.516
<v Speaker 1>and now we need to focus on that, and maybe

0:22:04.556 --> 0:22:06.996
<v Speaker 1>we need to think about amending the twenty fifth or

0:22:07.076 --> 0:22:09.916
<v Speaker 1>adding something that would enable us to act those circumstances

0:22:10.516 --> 0:22:15.516
<v Speaker 1>that we might look into that We'll be right back.

0:22:25.076 --> 0:22:27.956
<v Speaker 1>So let's turn out to this part in question. Nobody

0:22:28.116 --> 0:22:30.396
<v Speaker 1>in the Guilder presidentialist Darian says thought more about this

0:22:30.436 --> 0:22:32.716
<v Speaker 1>than you, because you thought about Ford and you thought

0:22:32.756 --> 0:22:36.236
<v Speaker 1>about Carter. So you and you also edited extensively the

0:22:36.316 --> 0:22:39.716
<v Speaker 1>Nixon tapes, so you've got a deep understanding of the

0:22:39.796 --> 0:22:43.756
<v Speaker 1>run up to Watergate, it's aftermath, and then the reconciliation

0:22:43.836 --> 0:22:46.796
<v Speaker 1>processes that did or didn't take place in the years

0:22:46.796 --> 0:22:49.036
<v Speaker 1>that followed. And I guess I'm wondering if you would

0:22:49.036 --> 0:22:51.916
<v Speaker 1>reflect on your deep knowledge of that period to think

0:22:51.916 --> 0:22:55.876
<v Speaker 1>about what should Joe Biden do with respect to the

0:22:56.116 --> 0:22:59.356
<v Speaker 1>hard question that he faces, which is, on the one hand,

0:22:59.396 --> 0:23:03.156
<v Speaker 1>there's an argument for reconciliation and moving on, and on

0:23:03.196 --> 0:23:06.196
<v Speaker 1>the other hand, there's an argument for historical accountability. And

0:23:06.276 --> 0:23:09.516
<v Speaker 1>obviously the reconciliation prevailed in the middle set in these

0:23:09.876 --> 0:23:11.516
<v Speaker 1>but there are lots of voices saying that this time

0:23:11.516 --> 0:23:14.476
<v Speaker 1>accountability should prevail. Well, you're right, and you know there's

0:23:14.476 --> 0:23:17.796
<v Speaker 1>a consensus, as you know, that Gerald Ford did the

0:23:17.916 --> 0:23:20.756
<v Speaker 1>right thing with Nixon, and that was not the consensus

0:23:20.836 --> 0:23:24.436
<v Speaker 1>at the time. Ford paid dearly for the partnering of

0:23:24.556 --> 0:23:26.996
<v Speaker 1>Richard Nixon, and in fact it may have cost him

0:23:27.036 --> 0:23:31.036
<v Speaker 1>the election in nineteen seventy six or certainly contributed to

0:23:31.076 --> 0:23:35.756
<v Speaker 1>his loss. But later decades later, most people said Ford

0:23:35.756 --> 0:23:39.836
<v Speaker 1>did the right thing. Ted Kennedy awarded Gerald Ford the

0:23:39.916 --> 0:23:44.516
<v Speaker 1>Profiles and Courage Award, with Kennedy Senator Kennedy then saying

0:23:44.556 --> 0:23:46.676
<v Speaker 1>I was wrong. I was so angry at you, but

0:23:46.756 --> 0:23:52.116
<v Speaker 1>in retrospect, you were right. President Ford and Biden situation

0:23:52.276 --> 0:23:54.316
<v Speaker 1>is going to be different. If I were giving advice

0:23:54.356 --> 0:23:57.876
<v Speaker 1>to Joe Biden, I would let Nancy Pelosi work with

0:23:58.116 --> 0:24:02.356
<v Speaker 1>Schumer on what's going to happen with impeachment. If I

0:24:02.436 --> 0:24:04.836
<v Speaker 1>were by night stay out of it for one hundred days,

0:24:05.396 --> 0:24:08.396
<v Speaker 1>I would try to craft one hundred days where impeachment

0:24:08.516 --> 0:24:13.476
<v Speaker 1>doesn't infect the Biden administration, because I do believe he

0:24:13.636 --> 0:24:17.956
<v Speaker 1>is inheriting such a difficult situation. With four hundred and

0:24:17.996 --> 0:24:22.716
<v Speaker 1>fifty thousand COVID deaths number rising. I'm not convinced we

0:24:22.796 --> 0:24:27.956
<v Speaker 1>have a logistical strategy for getting shots and arms two

0:24:27.956 --> 0:24:31.956
<v Speaker 1>shots and arms across the country this spring. So I

0:24:31.996 --> 0:24:34.916
<v Speaker 1>think he has one hundred days to work with Mitch McConnell,

0:24:35.396 --> 0:24:39.996
<v Speaker 1>try to work with Republicans on a COVID nineteen economic

0:24:40.556 --> 0:24:44.836
<v Speaker 1>stimulus relief bill, and a kind of martial plan on

0:24:44.876 --> 0:24:49.156
<v Speaker 1>getting the COVID vaccines out. After that one hundred days,

0:24:49.196 --> 0:24:51.076
<v Speaker 1>I would hope that we might be able to have

0:24:51.156 --> 0:24:57.396
<v Speaker 1>a Congressional Commission report presented to President Biden, which will

0:24:57.436 --> 0:25:00.676
<v Speaker 1>have gaps in it, obviously, but might be able to

0:25:00.716 --> 0:25:04.916
<v Speaker 1>point out how culpable is Trump for what happened on

0:25:05.076 --> 0:25:08.636
<v Speaker 1>January sixth, And I think Buying at that point's going

0:25:08.676 --> 0:25:12.756
<v Speaker 1>to have to decide whether the evidence is so egregious

0:25:12.956 --> 0:25:16.756
<v Speaker 1>that he has to let Schumer move forward in the Senate,

0:25:17.076 --> 0:25:19.916
<v Speaker 1>or if not, Biden may need to try to now

0:25:20.036 --> 0:25:24.036
<v Speaker 1>get control over his own Democratic Party and say, let's

0:25:24.156 --> 0:25:27.676
<v Speaker 1>cool our jets. What if we do a Senate censor.

0:25:28.236 --> 0:25:30.916
<v Speaker 1>What if we write a you know, I write a

0:25:31.036 --> 0:25:34.396
<v Speaker 1>presidential report, you know, and we do a media outreach

0:25:34.436 --> 0:25:37.236
<v Speaker 1>saying how guilty Trump was. But I'm not going to

0:25:37.316 --> 0:25:40.756
<v Speaker 1>take him through the trial. So I'm indifferent on the

0:25:40.796 --> 0:25:43.596
<v Speaker 1>trial now. I would want to see more evidence because

0:25:43.636 --> 0:25:46.716
<v Speaker 1>I do think it would cripple Biden if he goes

0:25:46.796 --> 0:25:50.316
<v Speaker 1>too soon in a Senate trial, and again it might

0:25:50.356 --> 0:25:55.716
<v Speaker 1>tear our country to smithereens. But without question, I would

0:25:55.836 --> 0:25:58.076
<v Speaker 1>not touch that trial for one hundred days if you

0:25:58.116 --> 0:26:00.316
<v Speaker 1>can boot it down the line for a little bit,

0:26:00.636 --> 0:26:05.516
<v Speaker 1>let emotions settle and start looking at the empirical facts

0:26:05.556 --> 0:26:07.636
<v Speaker 1>of what occurred. In a sense, it sounds like you're

0:26:07.676 --> 0:26:11.236
<v Speaker 1>saying that moving too quickly to a trial would sort

0:26:11.236 --> 0:26:15.916
<v Speaker 1>of drain power out of the Biden presidency, and especially

0:26:15.956 --> 0:26:18.556
<v Speaker 1>if Trump, as seems to me very likely, were to

0:26:18.556 --> 0:26:22.916
<v Speaker 1>be acquitted by the Senate, that actually may reinvigorate Trump's

0:26:22.956 --> 0:26:28.236
<v Speaker 1>own power as a potential candidate four years later, or

0:26:28.236 --> 0:26:30.556
<v Speaker 1>at least in the meantime as the most powerful figure

0:26:30.596 --> 0:26:32.956
<v Speaker 1>in the Republican Party. It. I mean, that's the sort

0:26:32.996 --> 0:26:36.756
<v Speaker 1>of like serious self harm story from the standpoint of

0:26:36.756 --> 0:26:39.316
<v Speaker 1>the Democrats, if indeed they push forward too quickly, am

0:26:39.316 --> 0:26:42.196
<v Speaker 1>I reading? You're right? I agree with that completely. You

0:26:42.396 --> 0:26:46.396
<v Speaker 1>said it perfectly. I think we have to be cautious

0:26:46.436 --> 0:26:49.796
<v Speaker 1>of that. It's a big moment now that Biden's inheriting

0:26:49.836 --> 0:26:53.956
<v Speaker 1>a major problem with COVID in the economy, and he's

0:26:53.996 --> 0:26:56.956
<v Speaker 1>got to keep focused to not let Donald Trump be

0:26:57.116 --> 0:26:59.156
<v Speaker 1>jumping around in his head. The one thing we don't

0:26:59.196 --> 0:27:02.156
<v Speaker 1>want to do is turn Trump into a martyr, you know,

0:27:02.236 --> 0:27:05.516
<v Speaker 1>immediately make him a folk hero that he beat the

0:27:05.636 --> 0:27:10.556
<v Speaker 1>rap yet again, and he'll probably does have a self pardon.

0:27:10.876 --> 0:27:15.196
<v Speaker 1>You know, I've been convinced by John Deane, colleague of Mina,

0:27:15.396 --> 0:27:19.316
<v Speaker 1>on CNN, who says that without a doubt Trump will

0:27:19.356 --> 0:27:24.036
<v Speaker 1>sign a personal pardon with his own private lawyer and

0:27:24.076 --> 0:27:27.676
<v Speaker 1>put it in a safe without announcing it to the public.

0:27:27.796 --> 0:27:30.436
<v Speaker 1>You can assume, Noah, that when you see Trump leave

0:27:30.556 --> 0:27:35.116
<v Speaker 1>for Florida, he has already signed and has notarized a

0:27:35.196 --> 0:27:38.676
<v Speaker 1>self pardon that he can pull out at any moment

0:27:38.796 --> 0:27:42.716
<v Speaker 1>and try to actualize when that gets pulled out. If

0:27:42.756 --> 0:27:45.156
<v Speaker 1>it gets pulled out, then that's going to eventually become

0:27:45.196 --> 0:27:48.876
<v Speaker 1>a Supreme Court case whether a president has the right

0:27:49.036 --> 0:27:52.756
<v Speaker 1>to self pardon or not. And it gets back to

0:27:52.876 --> 0:27:57.516
<v Speaker 1>my original complaint. I think we need to do some

0:27:57.596 --> 0:28:02.036
<v Speaker 1>clean up work on the twenty fifth Amendment on impeachments,

0:28:02.556 --> 0:28:06.236
<v Speaker 1>on pardoning. It seems to me that the fact that

0:28:06.276 --> 0:28:09.556
<v Speaker 1>we as a society don't know whether a president consult

0:28:09.636 --> 0:28:14.556
<v Speaker 1>partner not because nobody's ever done that before, and we've

0:28:14.596 --> 0:28:16.316
<v Speaker 1>got to wait and see till it goes to the

0:28:16.396 --> 0:28:20.076
<v Speaker 1>Supreme Court tells me that we might need to try

0:28:20.116 --> 0:28:22.916
<v Speaker 1>to figure out how to not have this happen again.

0:28:23.356 --> 0:28:25.356
<v Speaker 1>I've been saying since the beginning of the Trump presidency,

0:28:25.396 --> 0:28:28.036
<v Speaker 1>this is a stress test for our constitutional democracy, and

0:28:28.076 --> 0:28:29.836
<v Speaker 1>now we can read the read out of the stress

0:28:29.836 --> 0:28:32.236
<v Speaker 1>test and we see where our weaknesses are, and you've

0:28:32.316 --> 0:28:35.876
<v Speaker 1>highlighted some important ones. Before I let you go, there's

0:28:35.876 --> 0:28:38.476
<v Speaker 1>a question I've been dying to ask you. You are

0:28:38.956 --> 0:28:42.436
<v Speaker 1>the very model of the sober, thoughtful historian, and you

0:28:42.516 --> 0:28:47.356
<v Speaker 1>work on topics of great seriousness, presidential power, environmental protection.

0:28:48.316 --> 0:28:52.356
<v Speaker 1>But you also have a side which features your friendship

0:28:52.396 --> 0:28:55.316
<v Speaker 1>with the late gonzo journalist Hunter S. Thompson, and I

0:28:55.676 --> 0:28:58.396
<v Speaker 1>read that you're actually the literary executor of his estate,

0:28:58.396 --> 0:29:02.116
<v Speaker 1>which is an amazing responsibility. You've worked on the great

0:29:02.116 --> 0:29:06.476
<v Speaker 1>documentary with Johnny Depp about him. What's the backstory here?

0:29:06.516 --> 0:29:08.596
<v Speaker 1>How did you get to know Hunter S. Thompson And

0:29:08.756 --> 0:29:12.556
<v Speaker 1>what was the cement in your friendship. My mom and

0:29:12.636 --> 0:29:15.356
<v Speaker 1>dad were high school teachers and we had a twenty

0:29:15.396 --> 0:29:19.116
<v Speaker 1>four foot Coachman trailer, and so we traveled around the

0:29:19.156 --> 0:29:21.596
<v Speaker 1>summer and we would do road trips. So I became

0:29:21.676 --> 0:29:25.836
<v Speaker 1>a great lover of that kind of family vacation meets

0:29:26.436 --> 0:29:30.036
<v Speaker 1>Jack carrollas on the road. So when I was a

0:29:30.116 --> 0:29:33.436
<v Speaker 1>young professor in nineteen ninety two, I got a bus

0:29:33.476 --> 0:29:36.796
<v Speaker 1>called the Magic Bus, and college students would live on

0:29:36.836 --> 0:29:39.276
<v Speaker 1>the bus and we'd go for a semester all over

0:29:39.316 --> 0:29:43.516
<v Speaker 1>America thirty five thousand miles. We'd even go up to Alaska,

0:29:44.036 --> 0:29:48.676
<v Speaker 1>visiting presidential libraries, homes of people like Martin Luther King

0:29:48.796 --> 0:29:53.156
<v Speaker 1>or Helen Keller, Willi Kather, john Steinbeck on and on.

0:29:53.196 --> 0:29:56.596
<v Speaker 1>It was an all purpose American studies road trip. And

0:29:56.716 --> 0:29:59.396
<v Speaker 1>I would have the students read classic books, and when

0:29:59.396 --> 0:30:01.676
<v Speaker 1>I had them read Fear and Loving in Las Vegas.

0:30:02.276 --> 0:30:06.556
<v Speaker 1>We visited Hunter Wis Thompson in Colorado. We met Arthur

0:30:06.556 --> 0:30:10.036
<v Speaker 1>Miller in Connecticut, and Tony Morrise in New York, and

0:30:10.196 --> 0:30:14.076
<v Speaker 1>Ken Kesey and ore again. So they're about fifty writers

0:30:14.116 --> 0:30:17.756
<v Speaker 1>that were part of my program. Dick Goodwin, who died recently,

0:30:17.836 --> 0:30:20.996
<v Speaker 1>Doris Kerr and Goodwin's husband was great friends with Hunter,

0:30:21.556 --> 0:30:24.676
<v Speaker 1>and Dick Goodwin and Arthur Slussingshire both liked Hunter and

0:30:24.716 --> 0:30:27.076
<v Speaker 1>knew him and said, well, if you're doing that book,

0:30:27.076 --> 0:30:29.916
<v Speaker 1>why don't you go visit Hunter in Colorado. So I

0:30:29.996 --> 0:30:33.236
<v Speaker 1>pulled my bus in and he actually was kind of

0:30:33.236 --> 0:30:36.236
<v Speaker 1>a mensch, except Hunter would shoot all of the books.

0:30:36.276 --> 0:30:39.676
<v Speaker 1>All the other authors would autograph them. Hunter we make

0:30:39.676 --> 0:30:42.796
<v Speaker 1>them put it against a tree and shoot him. So

0:30:42.956 --> 0:30:45.916
<v Speaker 1>suddenly their book had a big bullet hole in him. Well,

0:30:45.996 --> 0:30:48.396
<v Speaker 1>some of the students thought that was idiotic, but there

0:30:48.396 --> 0:30:51.236
<v Speaker 1>were about half of the students that, oh my god,

0:30:51.236 --> 0:30:55.436
<v Speaker 1>it's so cruel. Hunter shot my book, you know. And

0:30:55.436 --> 0:30:59.356
<v Speaker 1>we became quite friendly. And he then asked me whether

0:30:59.396 --> 0:31:02.076
<v Speaker 1>I had helped him edit down some of his books,

0:31:02.636 --> 0:31:04.996
<v Speaker 1>and he trusted me enough to go in his basement,

0:31:05.076 --> 0:31:08.236
<v Speaker 1>and I found a goal mine of great writing and

0:31:08.316 --> 0:31:11.756
<v Speaker 1>brought out The Proud Highway, his first volume of collected

0:31:11.836 --> 0:31:16.196
<v Speaker 1>letters that I edited, Fear and Loathing in America, and

0:31:16.236 --> 0:31:19.196
<v Speaker 1>then a third one called a Mutineer I have queued

0:31:19.276 --> 0:31:22.676
<v Speaker 1>up right now to eventually bring out too. A Hunter

0:31:22.796 --> 0:31:27.036
<v Speaker 1>was a great satirist, a great natural, almost athletic writer

0:31:27.116 --> 0:31:31.796
<v Speaker 1>in his prime and had a prophetic sense, a bit

0:31:31.796 --> 0:31:35.276
<v Speaker 1>of a seer about some things. And so we became friends.

0:31:35.796 --> 0:31:39.036
<v Speaker 1>And while he drank and drugged a lot, he was

0:31:39.116 --> 0:31:41.356
<v Speaker 1>able to give a lot of good advice to me

0:31:41.396 --> 0:31:44.236
<v Speaker 1>in my personal life, which is kind of odd. But

0:31:44.356 --> 0:31:47.556
<v Speaker 1>he was unable to deal with his own personal life,

0:31:47.556 --> 0:31:49.476
<v Speaker 1>but he was smart enough to be able to give

0:31:49.516 --> 0:31:53.556
<v Speaker 1>good advice for somebody coming up the ladder. So while

0:31:53.596 --> 0:31:55.996
<v Speaker 1>I did my work in history, I learned a lot

0:31:56.036 --> 0:31:59.756
<v Speaker 1>about journalism from Hunter. That's completely fascinating and I hugely

0:31:59.796 --> 0:32:02.196
<v Speaker 1>appreciate that account. And I just want to thank you

0:32:02.316 --> 0:32:04.756
<v Speaker 1>very very much for your amazing work, for your time,

0:32:04.796 --> 0:32:07.556
<v Speaker 1>and for sharing your perspective with us this week. Thank

0:32:07.596 --> 0:32:10.716
<v Speaker 1>you for your amazing work everything you do. You have

0:32:10.796 --> 0:32:15.276
<v Speaker 1>a brilliant legal mind in your amazing asset to our country.

0:32:15.316 --> 0:32:17.076
<v Speaker 1>So and I saw you wanted me to do this,

0:32:17.476 --> 0:32:19.636
<v Speaker 1>I felt honored you wanted me to be on your

0:32:19.636 --> 0:32:30.276
<v Speaker 1>podcast to thank you. After talking to Professor Brinkley, I

0:32:30.436 --> 0:32:34.716
<v Speaker 1>came away with two central ideas. The first is that

0:32:34.756 --> 0:32:38.636
<v Speaker 1>Donald Trump's conduct as president culminating in the attack on

0:32:38.676 --> 0:32:41.756
<v Speaker 1>the Capitol, which he encouraged, and according to the article

0:32:41.756 --> 0:32:47.516
<v Speaker 1>of impeachment incited is an extraordinary outlier in US history,

0:32:48.236 --> 0:32:51.676
<v Speaker 1>so much so that Pressor Brinkley thinks we actually need

0:32:51.716 --> 0:32:54.996
<v Speaker 1>to take a closer look at the mechanisms of constitutional

0:32:55.116 --> 0:32:59.076
<v Speaker 1>power that we have to constrain a president who seems

0:32:59.076 --> 0:33:03.036
<v Speaker 1>to be going off the rails. The second point from

0:33:03.036 --> 0:33:07.436
<v Speaker 1>our conversation is more nuanced, and it's about how history

0:33:07.596 --> 0:33:11.916
<v Speaker 1>is likely to view this moment. Looking at President Nixon's

0:33:11.916 --> 0:33:16.316
<v Speaker 1>resignation and how the Republican Party and the Democratic Party

0:33:16.436 --> 0:33:20.876
<v Speaker 1>ultimately worked together to create a new story. Professor Brinkley

0:33:20.916 --> 0:33:25.636
<v Speaker 1>made the point that over time, we Americans tend to

0:33:25.676 --> 0:33:30.276
<v Speaker 1>create common historical narratives that function to bring us closer together,

0:33:30.916 --> 0:33:35.236
<v Speaker 1>even if they sometimes involve papering over some of the

0:33:35.316 --> 0:33:40.156
<v Speaker 1>most shocking aspects of the past, including shocking aspects of

0:33:40.196 --> 0:33:45.796
<v Speaker 1>presidential conduct. What that would mean for understanding the attack

0:33:45.876 --> 0:33:49.836
<v Speaker 1>on Congress in historical terms would be that the attack

0:33:49.876 --> 0:33:53.636
<v Speaker 1>would be somehow peripheralized, by which I mean it would

0:33:53.636 --> 0:33:57.036
<v Speaker 1>be treated by history as the action of a small

0:33:57.116 --> 0:34:02.316
<v Speaker 1>number of white supremacists and conspiracy theorists, rather than as

0:34:02.476 --> 0:34:06.516
<v Speaker 1>a manifestation of a national political movement that to a

0:34:06.516 --> 0:34:10.036
<v Speaker 1>certain degree came to take over the Republican Party, and

0:34:10.116 --> 0:34:13.796
<v Speaker 1>that denied the legitimacy of the results of the twenty

0:34:13.836 --> 0:34:18.556
<v Speaker 1>twenty presidential election. In order for a narrative like that

0:34:18.596 --> 0:34:22.956
<v Speaker 1>to emerge, a narrative that treated the capital attack as

0:34:23.116 --> 0:34:26.636
<v Speaker 1>far from the mainstream of American politics, there would have

0:34:26.716 --> 0:34:30.356
<v Speaker 1>to be a gradual process in which the Republican Party

0:34:30.476 --> 0:34:34.996
<v Speaker 1>came to accept the twenty twenty transition of power as legitimate.

0:34:35.636 --> 0:34:37.876
<v Speaker 1>For that to happen, the Republican Party would have to

0:34:38.036 --> 0:34:43.436
<v Speaker 1>de emphasize Donald Trump, and then and only then would

0:34:43.436 --> 0:34:45.916
<v Speaker 1>a new story be able to be told about the

0:34:45.916 --> 0:34:50.276
<v Speaker 1>attack on the Capitol, perhaps not completely accurate, but designed

0:34:50.316 --> 0:34:54.596
<v Speaker 1>to reestablish a national consensus. If that happens, and I

0:34:54.636 --> 0:34:57.476
<v Speaker 1>emphasize that that's only an if, it would show the

0:34:57.556 --> 0:35:02.716
<v Speaker 1>capacity of a US political system to retell, reframe, and

0:35:02.836 --> 0:35:07.956
<v Speaker 1>reshape historical narratives in order to generate outcomes of reconciliation.

0:35:08.756 --> 0:35:12.236
<v Speaker 1>If that happened, then the historical process would have operated

0:35:12.476 --> 0:35:15.196
<v Speaker 1>in a way really reminiscent of the aftermath of Richard

0:35:15.276 --> 0:35:19.716
<v Speaker 1>Nixon's presidency, in which ultimately the pardon if Nixon and

0:35:19.756 --> 0:35:23.836
<v Speaker 1>the public decision to quote move on enable the Republican

0:35:23.876 --> 0:35:28.196
<v Speaker 1>Party to avoid any serious long term costs for having

0:35:28.236 --> 0:35:32.756
<v Speaker 1>elected a president who abused the power of the office

0:35:33.196 --> 0:35:37.876
<v Speaker 1>and ultimately had to resign. These are all predictions made

0:35:37.876 --> 0:35:42.636
<v Speaker 1>against the backdrop of historical experience. They're falsifiable. They might

0:35:42.716 --> 0:35:45.396
<v Speaker 1>turn out not to be true. We will find out

0:35:45.476 --> 0:35:48.956
<v Speaker 1>in the future, the near future, what's right and what's not.

0:35:49.676 --> 0:35:52.636
<v Speaker 1>But as always, we can benefit from a deep encounter

0:35:53.116 --> 0:35:56.876
<v Speaker 1>with historical background material to help us make an educated

0:35:56.956 --> 0:36:01.556
<v Speaker 1>guess at what might happen next. Meanwhile, we have not

0:36:01.716 --> 0:36:05.516
<v Speaker 1>forgotten the COVID nineteen pandemic. We are hard at work

0:36:05.756 --> 0:36:10.276
<v Speaker 1>to bring you episodes exploring the latest developments, including a

0:36:10.356 --> 0:36:14.996
<v Speaker 1>conversation in the very near future about what new variants

0:36:14.996 --> 0:36:18.276
<v Speaker 1>of the virus mean for the configuration of health and

0:36:18.436 --> 0:36:21.916
<v Speaker 1>power in the world. Until the next time I speak

0:36:21.916 --> 0:36:27.076
<v Speaker 1>to you, be careful, be safe, and be well. Deep

0:36:27.076 --> 0:36:30.396
<v Speaker 1>Background is brought to you by Pushkin Industries. Our producer

0:36:30.516 --> 0:36:33.876
<v Speaker 1>is Mo laboord our engineer is Martin Gonzalez, and our

0:36:33.916 --> 0:36:38.476
<v Speaker 1>shore runner is Sophie Crane mckibbon. Editorial support from noahm Osband.

0:36:38.916 --> 0:36:42.596
<v Speaker 1>Theme music by Luis Skara at Pushkin. Thanks to Mia Lobell,

0:36:42.876 --> 0:36:48.036
<v Speaker 1>Julia Barton, Lydia, Jean Coott, Heather Faine, Carl mcniori, Maggie Taylor,

0:36:48.156 --> 0:36:50.996
<v Speaker 1>Eric Xander, and Jacob Weisberg. You can find me on

0:36:50.996 --> 0:36:54.036
<v Speaker 1>Twitter at Noah rfeld. I also write a column for

0:36:54.036 --> 0:36:57.076
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Opinion, which you can find at Bloomberg dot com

0:36:57.076 --> 0:37:01.236
<v Speaker 1>slash Feldman. To discover Bloomberg's original slate of podcasts, go

0:37:01.316 --> 0:37:04.556
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg dot com slash podcasts, and if you liked

0:37:04.556 --> 0:37:07.116
<v Speaker 1>what you heard today, please write a review or tell

0:37:07.156 --> 0:37:08.956
<v Speaker 1>a friend. This is deep back.