WEBVTT - BI Weekend: Nvidia Earnings, Apple US Investment 

0:00:00.280 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, Podcasts, radio News. This is Bloomberg Intelligence

0:00:11.560 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>with Alex Steel and Paul Sweeney.

0:00:13.760 --> 0:00:17.000
<v Speaker 2>The real app performance has been in US corporate high yield.

0:00:17.160 --> 0:00:19.520
<v Speaker 3>Are the companies lean enough? Have they trimmed all the fats?

0:00:19.600 --> 0:00:23.200
<v Speaker 2>The semiconductor business is a really cyclical business.

0:00:22.840 --> 0:00:26.560
<v Speaker 1>Breaking market headlines and corporate news from across the globe.

0:00:26.600 --> 0:00:29.040
<v Speaker 3>Do investors like the M and A that we've seen?

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:32.199
<v Speaker 2>These are two big time blue chip companies.

0:00:32.479 --> 0:00:35.839
<v Speaker 3>Window between the peak and count changing super fast.

0:00:36.120 --> 0:00:41.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence with Alex Steel and Paul Sweeney on Bloomberg Radio.

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:44.840
<v Speaker 2>On Today's Bloomerg Intelligence Show, we dig inside the big

0:00:44.840 --> 0:00:47.199
<v Speaker 2>business stories impacting Wall Street and the global markets.

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:49.280
<v Speaker 3>Each and every week we provide in depth research and

0:00:49.360 --> 0:00:51.080
<v Speaker 3>data on some of the two thousand companies and one

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:53.680
<v Speaker 3>hundred and thirty industries our analysts cover worldwide.

0:00:53.880 --> 0:00:56.240
<v Speaker 2>Today, we'll look at why Apple is investing five hundred

0:00:56.280 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars in the US over the next four years.

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:00.960
<v Speaker 3>Plus, we'll discuss how the global reach tell giant Walmart

0:01:01.000 --> 0:01:03.400
<v Speaker 3>is navigating a second Donald Trump presidency.

0:01:03.760 --> 0:01:06.160
<v Speaker 2>First, we begin with big tech and the chip giant

0:01:06.200 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 2>and video This week and Vidia reported good but not

0:01:09.000 --> 0:01:09.800
<v Speaker 2>great earnings.

0:01:10.040 --> 0:01:12.280
<v Speaker 3>The company also warn the gross profit margins would be

0:01:12.319 --> 0:01:14.679
<v Speaker 3>tighter than anticipated as it rushes to roll out a

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 3>new chip design called Blackwell.

0:01:16.319 --> 0:01:18.080
<v Speaker 2>For more on this, we were joined by Gene Munster,

0:01:18.240 --> 0:01:20.679
<v Speaker 2>managing partner at deep Water Asset Management.

0:01:20.800 --> 0:01:23.240
<v Speaker 3>We first asked Gene for his take on Vidia earnings.

0:01:23.440 --> 0:01:27.200
<v Speaker 4>Well, the results were good but not great, And specifically

0:01:27.319 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 4>is the margin guidance at seventy one percent versus the

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:33.600
<v Speaker 4>three to seventy two and there weren't a whispers that

0:01:33.640 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 4>they were going to lower margins. I think that really

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 4>stood out to me. The upside on revenue a billion

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:42.760
<v Speaker 4>compares to the expectations of like a billion and a

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:45.319
<v Speaker 4>half to two billion, and so I think that these

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 4>were good in the sense they did raise on revenue,

0:01:47.840 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 4>but not great effectively. What they're doing is pushing the

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 4>ramp to the back half of the year, especially on margins.

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:57.200
<v Speaker 4>That's when the margins they said to kind of go

0:01:57.240 --> 0:01:59.360
<v Speaker 4>to seventy five percent. And I would add one other

0:01:59.400 --> 0:02:02.600
<v Speaker 4>piece to this is going into the print. I believe

0:02:02.640 --> 0:02:06.160
<v Speaker 4>that the most important point was related to commentary about

0:02:06.160 --> 0:02:09.160
<v Speaker 4>how sold out they were on Blackwell. This is a

0:02:09.200 --> 0:02:12.079
<v Speaker 4>metric that they typically give and last quarter they said

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:14.720
<v Speaker 4>they were sold out. For basically three quarters of this year,

0:02:15.280 --> 0:02:18.600
<v Speaker 4>they were radio silent on the topic. They surprisingly didn't

0:02:18.600 --> 0:02:21.040
<v Speaker 4>get asked a question on it. But I think that

0:02:21.600 --> 0:02:26.000
<v Speaker 4>Jensen's comments about the need for compute being one hundred

0:02:26.040 --> 0:02:29.480
<v Speaker 4>to one million I double checked that on the transcript.

0:02:29.639 --> 0:02:32.480
<v Speaker 4>One hundred to one million times more compute needed for

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:38.399
<v Speaker 4>reasoning and physical AI and robotics AI. That increase in compute,

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 4>I think gave investors some optimism that, well, this year

0:02:42.520 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 4>might not be the year that twenty twenty six is

0:02:45.520 --> 0:02:47.600
<v Speaker 4>going to grow faster than what people think. And so

0:02:48.280 --> 0:02:51.760
<v Speaker 4>set a different way is that the results and guidance

0:02:52.040 --> 0:02:55.040
<v Speaker 4>don't give a ton of optimism. But if you look

0:02:55.080 --> 0:02:58.600
<v Speaker 4>at where this ultimately could go, if you take what

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 4>Jensen is saying right to buy ten, that means they're

0:03:01.880 --> 0:03:04.040
<v Speaker 4>still going to comfortably beat the numbers next year.

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:07.160
<v Speaker 3>Okay, there's a lot of unpack with that. So let's

0:03:07.160 --> 0:03:09.799
<v Speaker 3>go back to gross margins for a second. Based on

0:03:10.120 --> 0:03:12.600
<v Speaker 3>their call that gross margins will hit seventy five percent

0:03:12.600 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 3>in the back half of the year, when do we

0:03:14.600 --> 0:03:15.760
<v Speaker 3>think they're going to bottom?

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 4>So they got answered the guess that question on the call,

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:20.600
<v Speaker 4>and they kind of sidestep it, but if you read

0:03:20.680 --> 0:03:23.920
<v Speaker 4>between the lines, they probably go lower again in the

0:03:24.000 --> 0:03:26.200
<v Speaker 4>July quarter. So there's an April quarter that we're in

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 4>right now than they go to the July quarter. My

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:31.120
<v Speaker 4>guess is they probably bottom then at around seventy percent,

0:03:31.280 --> 0:03:36.440
<v Speaker 4>So effectively going from seventy to seventy five over six months,

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:39.200
<v Speaker 4>it's a pretty big jump. At the time of the call,

0:03:39.280 --> 0:03:42.360
<v Speaker 4>the stock was up two percent in after hours when

0:03:42.440 --> 0:03:44.240
<v Speaker 4>they came to the last question on the call, which

0:03:44.360 --> 0:03:47.600
<v Speaker 4>was related to that ramp in margins and how realistic

0:03:47.760 --> 0:03:51.880
<v Speaker 4>is that if we have more export controls and the

0:03:52.000 --> 0:03:54.760
<v Speaker 4>answer was, we don't know how export controls are going

0:03:54.800 --> 0:03:57.120
<v Speaker 4>to impact our business, And immediately the stock went from

0:03:57.240 --> 0:04:00.000
<v Speaker 4>up call it two percent to down a half a percent.

0:04:00.280 --> 0:04:02.680
<v Speaker 4>We saw basically two percent move in it, and so

0:04:02.880 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 4>I think that speaks to investors saying like that's that's

0:04:06.800 --> 0:04:08.960
<v Speaker 4>a risk here is like are we really going to

0:04:08.960 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 4>get to that margin ramp we talked about the seventy

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:14.800
<v Speaker 4>three percent margins for a tech company, for a hardware company.

0:04:15.160 --> 0:04:17.279
<v Speaker 4>I think at the end of the day, they're still remarkable.

0:04:17.400 --> 0:04:19.919
<v Speaker 4>But for these stocks to keep working, you need to

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 4>have margins at a minimum stable and growing. And I

0:04:23.400 --> 0:04:25.279
<v Speaker 4>just want to put one final thought on this Alex

0:04:25.360 --> 0:04:27.919
<v Speaker 4>is that ultimately I think margins will get back to

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:29.479
<v Speaker 4>that seventy five percent. I don't know if it's going

0:04:29.520 --> 0:04:32.560
<v Speaker 4>to be in Q four early next year, but if

0:04:32.760 --> 0:04:34.479
<v Speaker 4>the ramp is what I think it's going to be

0:04:34.520 --> 0:04:36.040
<v Speaker 4>for next year, I think we're going to get back

0:04:36.080 --> 0:04:38.120
<v Speaker 4>to some go go days and video.

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:42.320
<v Speaker 2>Geene, the driver for this stock tremendous performance over the

0:04:42.320 --> 0:04:45.160
<v Speaker 2>past two years has been beaten and raised by a

0:04:45.200 --> 0:04:48.560
<v Speaker 2>certain order of magnitude. If for no other reason than

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:51.600
<v Speaker 2>the law of large numbers, that order of magnitude likely

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:55.160
<v Speaker 2>will be lower. Can this stock continue to work with

0:04:55.680 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 2>the law of large numbers not giving in that two

0:04:57.680 --> 0:05:00.280
<v Speaker 2>three four billion dollar beat and raise every quarter?

0:05:01.320 --> 0:05:03.760
<v Speaker 4>I think it can. And just to put in perspective,

0:05:03.800 --> 0:05:05.800
<v Speaker 4>we've gone from a twenty billion dollar business a few

0:05:05.839 --> 0:05:07.400
<v Speaker 4>years ago. It's going to be about a two hundred

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:10.200
<v Speaker 4>billion dollar business this year. But there's still our companies

0:05:10.240 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 4>apples a four hundred billion dollar business. I mean, you

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:15.080
<v Speaker 4>can still continue to grow from that, and it doesn't

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:18.400
<v Speaker 4>need to have that breathtaking growth. And I would come

0:05:18.480 --> 0:05:21.839
<v Speaker 4>back to the central question here. It's not about twenty

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:25.200
<v Speaker 4>twenty five, it's the twenty three percent growth in calendar

0:05:25.240 --> 0:05:27.760
<v Speaker 4>twenty six, and do you think that the number is

0:05:27.800 --> 0:05:29.760
<v Speaker 4>going to be higher or lower than that? And ultimately

0:05:29.800 --> 0:05:31.000
<v Speaker 4>I think the number is going to be higher. I

0:05:31.040 --> 0:05:32.880
<v Speaker 4>think we're going to get back to a point where we,

0:05:33.440 --> 0:05:36.000
<v Speaker 4>despite the law of large numbers, we get to some

0:05:36.040 --> 0:05:39.880
<v Speaker 4>of those improving, those improving upsize and beats, and it

0:05:39.960 --> 0:05:42.839
<v Speaker 4>just comes down to what I think is a large

0:05:42.880 --> 0:05:45.440
<v Speaker 4>tam and what I still believe is a competitive advantage

0:05:45.480 --> 0:05:49.080
<v Speaker 4>that GPUs have over custom silicon, and we'll see how

0:05:49.080 --> 0:05:52.360
<v Speaker 4>that plays out. But that's essentially the debate that's going

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 4>on right now is just how much compute you need

0:05:55.200 --> 0:05:58.520
<v Speaker 4>and how defensible is Vidia. I think there's a boatload

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 4>of compute, much more than we realize it's going to

0:06:00.520 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 4>be needed, and I think in Videa's in a great

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:04.000
<v Speaker 4>position related to that. We're going to have to wait

0:06:04.600 --> 0:06:08.200
<v Speaker 4>to get to those results, but I think anticipation of

0:06:08.240 --> 0:06:09.840
<v Speaker 4>that is going to be positive for the stock at

0:06:09.839 --> 0:06:10.599
<v Speaker 4>some point this year.

0:06:10.680 --> 0:06:13.240
<v Speaker 2>Our thanks to Gene Mounster, managing partner at deep Water

0:06:13.279 --> 0:06:14.560
<v Speaker 2>Asset Management.

0:06:14.160 --> 0:06:16.279
<v Speaker 3>We moved next to the Energy sector. This week, we

0:06:16.320 --> 0:06:20.080
<v Speaker 3>looked at the energy technologies company American Superconductor Corp. It's

0:06:20.160 --> 0:06:22.360
<v Speaker 3>NASDAK ticker is AMSC.

0:06:22.800 --> 0:06:26.279
<v Speaker 2>The firm specializes in using superconductors for the development of

0:06:26.480 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 2>diverse power systems, and the hope is to meet the

0:06:29.560 --> 0:06:32.000
<v Speaker 2>world's demand for smarter, cleaner, and better energy.

0:06:32.360 --> 0:06:35.200
<v Speaker 3>AMSC also recently reported third quarter earnings and said it's

0:06:35.240 --> 0:06:37.840
<v Speaker 3>revenue grew fifty five percent from a year ago.

0:06:38.279 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 2>For more on AMSC, we were joined by its CEO,

0:06:41.680 --> 0:06:42.480
<v Speaker 2>Daniel McGahn.

0:06:42.800 --> 0:06:45.200
<v Speaker 3>We first asked Daniel to describe what is company actually

0:06:45.279 --> 0:06:46.720
<v Speaker 3>does with regard to power.

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:49.039
<v Speaker 5>We don't really make the power move the power, but

0:06:49.080 --> 0:06:50.919
<v Speaker 5>we make sure that the power is where it is

0:06:50.960 --> 0:06:51.680
<v Speaker 5>when it's needed.

0:06:52.040 --> 0:06:53.680
<v Speaker 3>So what does that wind up meaning so you can

0:06:53.720 --> 0:06:55.839
<v Speaker 3>tuck to the electricity basically.

0:06:55.720 --> 0:06:58.360
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, So if it's an industrial site in the manufacturer

0:06:58.360 --> 0:07:01.599
<v Speaker 5>that needs power at a certain level, certain frequency, we

0:07:01.720 --> 0:07:04.719
<v Speaker 5>modulate that and make it the right way for that factory.

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:08.000
<v Speaker 5>Same thing if you're trying to deal with bringing generation

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:11.400
<v Speaker 5>onto the grid or even different spots within the grid itself,

0:07:11.440 --> 0:07:13.400
<v Speaker 5>to bolster and make sure that the power can go

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:14.200
<v Speaker 5>where it's needed.

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:18.000
<v Speaker 2>All right, that sounds critical sounds important, but it doesn't

0:07:18.040 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 2>sound sexy. Are you guys getting caught up in that

0:07:20.160 --> 0:07:21.800
<v Speaker 2>AI and the need for energy?

0:07:21.880 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 5>And I don't. Yeah, I think we're getting caught up

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:25.400
<v Speaker 5>in the need for energy. I think there's a lot

0:07:25.400 --> 0:07:28.680
<v Speaker 5>of drivers that are changing our need for power. If

0:07:28.680 --> 0:07:31.560
<v Speaker 5>you think about everything you do in your day now

0:07:31.640 --> 0:07:35.480
<v Speaker 5>requires electricity, and that can be from healthcare to data

0:07:35.520 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 5>to semiconductor manufacturing and everything in between. So power it

0:07:39.960 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 5>becomes more and more critical. We're becoming more dependent upon it.

0:07:42.920 --> 0:07:45.640
<v Speaker 5>And the grid really wasn't built for the modern era

0:07:45.720 --> 0:07:47.040
<v Speaker 5>of electricity.

0:07:46.640 --> 0:07:48.920
<v Speaker 3>And from that perspective, I mean just for a super

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:51.920
<v Speaker 3>nerdy moment. You guys also make the conductors, right, like

0:07:51.960 --> 0:07:53.800
<v Speaker 3>the thing that so if you have a wind farm

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:55.320
<v Speaker 3>and you need attached to a grid, there's like a

0:07:55.360 --> 0:07:57.480
<v Speaker 3>piece of equipment that you need to attach it. You

0:07:57.520 --> 0:08:00.480
<v Speaker 3>make those and those are in super super soon tight

0:08:00.520 --> 0:08:03.520
<v Speaker 3>demand like tons of demand, not on a supply, doesn't

0:08:03.520 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 3>matter what kind of power source that is. Am I accurate?

0:08:05.640 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, And many of the suppliers are from overseas as well,

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:10.240
<v Speaker 5>So we're kind of unique also being in an American

0:08:10.280 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 5>company making product in America with Americans and I think

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:16.440
<v Speaker 5>that fits very well in today's climate where we're trying

0:08:16.480 --> 0:08:17.400
<v Speaker 5>to push the country.

0:08:17.600 --> 0:08:19.720
<v Speaker 2>What are the drivers for your company right here, right now?

0:08:19.760 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 2>I know you've recently reported earnings of what did you

0:08:22.400 --> 0:08:24.080
<v Speaker 2>identify as the drivers for your business?

0:08:24.800 --> 0:08:26.600
<v Speaker 5>A lot of it is this further in the need

0:08:26.680 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 5>for demand. A lot of it we're seeing our business

0:08:30.040 --> 0:08:33.560
<v Speaker 5>start to really with the reshoring of manufacturing capacity and

0:08:33.559 --> 0:08:37.440
<v Speaker 5>capability in America. All those operations need power, so we

0:08:37.480 --> 0:08:41.360
<v Speaker 5>see expansion in manufacturing that's starting to happen critically in

0:08:41.679 --> 0:08:44.320
<v Speaker 5>these critical elements if you want to deal with cars

0:08:44.360 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 5>and chips and AI and all those things. We sit

0:08:47.080 --> 0:08:49.880
<v Speaker 5>kind of secondarily that we help enable the power to

0:08:49.960 --> 0:08:53.160
<v Speaker 5>be there. But more and more operations are becoming more

0:08:53.200 --> 0:08:54.679
<v Speaker 5>dependent upon electricity.

0:08:55.320 --> 0:08:57.920
<v Speaker 3>So from that perspective, does it matter to you where

0:08:57.920 --> 0:09:00.839
<v Speaker 3>the electricity comes from? In that is the policy from

0:09:00.880 --> 0:09:04.200
<v Speaker 3>a Biden administration and transition to a Trump administration on

0:09:04.440 --> 0:09:06.920
<v Speaker 3>say energy and climate, does that matter?

0:09:07.400 --> 0:09:09.760
<v Speaker 5>Well, I'll say something that may not be popular, but

0:09:09.840 --> 0:09:12.520
<v Speaker 5>I'll still say that I think that the end result

0:09:12.640 --> 0:09:16.280
<v Speaker 5>and desire from both are the same. We want to

0:09:16.320 --> 0:09:19.520
<v Speaker 5>make sure that we're building an economy in America for Americans.

0:09:20.320 --> 0:09:22.760
<v Speaker 5>I think that was consistent with the last administration. It's

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 5>definitely consistent with the current administration. The question is the

0:09:25.760 --> 0:09:28.719
<v Speaker 5>policy and how how do we help enable it. Are

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:32.400
<v Speaker 5>we trying to create a market that people want to

0:09:32.679 --> 0:09:35.280
<v Speaker 5>companies want to invest in, or is the government trying

0:09:35.320 --> 0:09:38.599
<v Speaker 5>to help foster that through money and through policy that

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:41.080
<v Speaker 5>is more economic. At the end of the day, for us,

0:09:41.120 --> 0:09:43.760
<v Speaker 5>it doesn't quite matter. The problem is still the problem.

0:09:43.800 --> 0:09:46.959
<v Speaker 5>The grid needs to be improved. Utilities are working on that,

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:51.160
<v Speaker 5>but as more manufacturing capacity comes online, there's need for

0:09:51.280 --> 0:09:53.800
<v Speaker 5>higher quality power and that's where we come in and

0:09:53.840 --> 0:09:56.599
<v Speaker 5>help solve those problems. Who do you compete against? A

0:09:56.679 --> 0:09:59.319
<v Speaker 5>lot of the big guys from your and what we

0:09:59.480 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 5>found is that be like Semens, It could be Semans

0:10:02.360 --> 0:10:05.000
<v Speaker 5>or ABB locally here in the US a small company

0:10:05.040 --> 0:10:08.720
<v Speaker 5>called General Electric. But what we've found is over the

0:10:08.720 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 5>past several years, our largest competitors have become very good customers.

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:15.800
<v Speaker 5>And what we found is what we offer, the uniqueness

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 5>of what we do and the service that we provide,

0:10:19.080 --> 0:10:21.480
<v Speaker 5>it complements their offering and I think they're starting to

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 5>understand that we're not really a threat per se to

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:26.719
<v Speaker 5>their business. We're a helpful solution to.

0:10:26.679 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 6>The end customer.

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:30.320
<v Speaker 3>What inputs do you need for your business? So? What

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 3>things are tight for you? What things do you want

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:33.680
<v Speaker 3>to help change?

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:36.000
<v Speaker 5>When you say inputs, I think supply chaining.

0:10:36.120 --> 0:10:37.719
<v Speaker 3>That's what I'm and that's what I'm trying to get at.

0:10:37.760 --> 0:10:39.679
<v Speaker 3>So is it like the raw materials that you need

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:41.360
<v Speaker 3>to build stuff in the US to themselves?

0:10:41.559 --> 0:10:44.200
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, almost everything that we make in the US, so

0:10:44.280 --> 0:10:47.640
<v Speaker 5>probably eighty five percent of our businesses here home in

0:10:47.640 --> 0:10:51.840
<v Speaker 5>the US manufactured here. Almost all of our supply chain,

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:54.920
<v Speaker 5>probably more than ninety five ninety six percent is sourced

0:10:54.960 --> 0:10:58.480
<v Speaker 5>in the US. So the current applimate really puts us

0:10:58.480 --> 0:11:02.199
<v Speaker 5>in a unique opportunity that we may have unique opportunities

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:05.880
<v Speaker 5>presented to us because we are American, American, made by Americans,

0:11:05.880 --> 0:11:10.800
<v Speaker 5>supplied mostly by American suppliers. When people talk about tariffs

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:13.960
<v Speaker 5>and these kind of external policies, they don't have a

0:11:13.960 --> 0:11:16.800
<v Speaker 5>great impact on what we do now. They may. I

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:18.360
<v Speaker 5>don't know how things are going to sort out. There's

0:11:18.360 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 5>a lot of rhetoric and then we'll see how reality

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:22.880
<v Speaker 5>translates from that reetarc and really what gets put in place.

0:11:23.200 --> 0:11:25.040
<v Speaker 5>But a lot of this is trying to push the

0:11:25.080 --> 0:11:27.560
<v Speaker 5>country in a certain direction, and I think that general

0:11:27.559 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 5>direction is good for us.

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 2>So are you having conversations with your customers now? They

0:11:31.640 --> 0:11:33.599
<v Speaker 2>may be calling you them saying, hey, Dan, we're a

0:11:33.640 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 2>little nervous about what might be happening over the next three, six,

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 2>twelve months in terms of tariffs. Are they Are you

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:41.440
<v Speaker 2>seeing that in your order flow or are you seeing

0:11:41.440 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 2>that maybe just in conversations you're having.

0:11:43.240 --> 0:11:46.840
<v Speaker 5>We're seeing that from companies in Canada, Mexico, We're seeing

0:11:46.840 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 5>that to some extent, some companies on the continent of Europe,

0:11:51.000 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 5>but certainly in the US they're comforted by the fact

0:11:53.320 --> 0:11:54.800
<v Speaker 5>of where we make it and how we make it

0:11:54.840 --> 0:11:56.360
<v Speaker 5>and where we source broughduct from.

0:11:56.400 --> 0:11:58.040
<v Speaker 3>Some of the headlines over the last couple of days

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:01.160
<v Speaker 3>have evolved around tariffs on things like aluminum. Copper was

0:12:01.160 --> 0:12:04.800
<v Speaker 3>thrown into the mix yesterday. If that winds up denting

0:12:04.920 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 3>demand as and we're not going to build as much

0:12:06.800 --> 0:12:09.920
<v Speaker 3>manufacturing or industrial sites because it's just really expensive, how

0:12:09.920 --> 0:12:10.920
<v Speaker 3>does that trickle to you?

0:12:11.200 --> 0:12:13.440
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think the opposite's going to happen. The need

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:15.800
<v Speaker 5>is going to persist. The question is can it absorb

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 5>the cost and there's going to have to be a

0:12:18.280 --> 0:12:20.960
<v Speaker 5>way to figure that out and find that out. But

0:12:21.040 --> 0:12:23.959
<v Speaker 5>I think all of the things that go into the

0:12:24.000 --> 0:12:27.199
<v Speaker 5>electric grid use all those materials, so they're going to

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:30.720
<v Speaker 5>have to get sources. And if it makes American sourced

0:12:30.840 --> 0:12:34.840
<v Speaker 5>product more competitive, then so be it. From my standpoint,

0:12:34.880 --> 0:12:37.960
<v Speaker 5>it doesn't directly affect us because we're already sourcing most

0:12:37.960 --> 0:12:40.040
<v Speaker 5>of our principal equipment from the US.

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:43.720
<v Speaker 2>Our thanks to amsc CEO Daniel mcgahann.

0:12:43.800 --> 0:12:45.199
<v Speaker 3>All right, coming up, we're going to break down why

0:12:45.200 --> 0:12:48.240
<v Speaker 3>the coffee giant Starbucks is cutting jobs across it's corporate ranks.

0:12:48.360 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing in

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 2>depth research and data on two thousand companies and one

0:12:53.600 --> 0:12:56.760
<v Speaker 2>hundred and thirty industries. You can access Bloomberg Intelligence VfB.

0:12:57.000 --> 0:12:58.040
<v Speaker 2>I go on the terminal.

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:01.079
<v Speaker 3>I'm Paul swinging anmlex deal. This is Bloomberg.

0:13:05.440 --> 0:13:09.120
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence podcast. Catch us live

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:12.319
<v Speaker 1>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Apple, Cocklay and Android

0:13:12.320 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:19.720
<v Speaker 1>you get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube.

0:13:20.280 --> 0:13:22.640
<v Speaker 3>We moved next to news from the coffee giant Starbucks.

0:13:22.960 --> 0:13:25.679
<v Speaker 2>This week, the company announced that it's eliminating eleven hundred

0:13:25.760 --> 0:13:26.480
<v Speaker 2>corporate jobs.

0:13:26.600 --> 0:13:29.200
<v Speaker 3>The move by Starbucks has aimed at increasing efficiency and

0:13:29.240 --> 0:13:31.240
<v Speaker 3>revitalizing the company for more.

0:13:31.280 --> 0:13:34.400
<v Speaker 2>We were joined by Michael Halen Bloomberg Intelligence senior Restaurant

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 2>and food service Anaallygics.

0:13:35.400 --> 0:13:37.600
<v Speaker 3>We first asked Michael what he thinks of this week's news.

0:13:38.200 --> 0:13:40.800
<v Speaker 7>Well, you know, every situation is a little different. You know,

0:13:41.360 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 7>I did a lot of TV and radio last year

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:46.720
<v Speaker 7>when Brian Nichol was hired, and you know, I said

0:13:46.760 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 7>he's going to instill a culture of transparency and accountability

0:13:50.840 --> 0:13:53.680
<v Speaker 7>and if you're not adding value, you know, you're probably

0:13:53.720 --> 0:13:55.880
<v Speaker 7>going to be shown the door. So this is really

0:13:55.920 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 7>not a surprise to us. It's not a surprise to

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:02.120
<v Speaker 7>the street. It was communicated back in January. And you know,

0:14:02.160 --> 0:14:05.720
<v Speaker 7>we've seen a lot of senior management changes as well.

0:14:05.760 --> 0:14:08.640
<v Speaker 7>You know, this was a company that was performing pretty

0:14:08.640 --> 0:14:12.120
<v Speaker 7>poorly under the previous management team. I'm sure there was

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:17.200
<v Speaker 7>plenty of deadweight in that large company, So not really

0:14:17.200 --> 0:14:17.960
<v Speaker 7>a surprise here.

0:14:18.640 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 3>What about them cutting all the drinks, like all the

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 3>stuff my daughter likes to order and I was thinking,

0:14:23.960 --> 0:14:25.960
<v Speaker 3>I joke, but really like, she's not gonna want anything

0:14:26.000 --> 0:14:28.520
<v Speaker 3>from Starbucks now, and they're no longer training her as

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:30.760
<v Speaker 3>a ten year old to then come into Starbucks as

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:31.440
<v Speaker 3>they get older.

0:14:32.200 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 7>Is that a bad thing?

0:14:33.600 --> 0:14:36.800
<v Speaker 3>Not for me, but I'm guessing for Starbucks maybe.

0:14:37.080 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 7>Well, you know, I think what they're trying to get

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:44.040
<v Speaker 7>back to is what made Starbucks great. How did Starbucks

0:14:44.080 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 7>get to be you know, tens of thousands of stores

0:14:46.680 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 7>globally it was it was really by through the espresso, drinks,

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:54.240
<v Speaker 7>through a great in store experience where the barista knew

0:14:54.320 --> 0:14:56.800
<v Speaker 7>your name right, and and so they're trying to get

0:14:56.840 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 7>back to a lot of those things. You know, they're

0:15:01.880 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 7>they're looking for that that core. Guess that's that's coming

0:15:05.480 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 7>in there multiple times a day and providing them a

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:11.960
<v Speaker 7>great experience. I think that's a that's a smart path forward.

0:15:12.720 --> 0:15:12.920
<v Speaker 5>Mike.

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 2>You cover the whole restaurant space here. You see the

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 2>different price points. What are you seeing out there? How's

0:15:19.080 --> 0:15:22.920
<v Speaker 2>the consumer doing? From maybe just the data you see

0:15:22.920 --> 0:15:24.160
<v Speaker 2>about restaurant activity.

0:15:25.120 --> 0:15:27.560
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, so last year was a restaurant recession. You know,

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:30.240
<v Speaker 7>we think things will be a little bit better here

0:15:30.240 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 7>in twenty twenty five, but it's been choppy kind of

0:15:33.440 --> 0:15:35.720
<v Speaker 7>to start the year. And a big problem has been

0:15:35.760 --> 0:15:39.720
<v Speaker 7>this cold weather. January was the coldest, you know, the

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 7>oldest January in like fourteen years, I think in the

0:15:42.640 --> 0:15:46.240
<v Speaker 7>United States. There was a significant amount of snow throughout

0:15:46.280 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 7>the United States in January and February. So there's been

0:15:48.720 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 7>a lot of closed restaurant days, and so it's been

0:15:51.680 --> 0:15:54.080
<v Speaker 7>a choppy start to the year for the restaurant space.

0:15:54.160 --> 0:15:56.160
<v Speaker 7>You know, we think it's going to be better than

0:15:56.160 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 7>twenty twenty four, but you know, we don't expect the

0:15:59.320 --> 0:16:03.040
<v Speaker 7>gang Busters year, mainly because of inflation still continuing to

0:16:03.560 --> 0:16:05.360
<v Speaker 7>crimp low income consumer spending.

0:16:05.720 --> 0:16:08.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, and also you know, for example, coffee prices are

0:16:08.400 --> 0:16:10.400
<v Speaker 3>really high. Egg price is still really high. Like those

0:16:10.440 --> 0:16:13.680
<v Speaker 3>things are pretty sticky. Going back to Starbucks for a second,

0:16:13.840 --> 0:16:17.440
<v Speaker 3>So the CEO, Brian Nicol, took over in September as

0:16:17.480 --> 0:16:21.000
<v Speaker 3>sales were declining. Obviously he's formerly of Chipotle. Do we

0:16:21.120 --> 0:16:23.880
<v Speaker 3>have this playbook from Chipotle and then how it's being implemented,

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:26.080
<v Speaker 3>say into Starbucks, and if so, kind of where are

0:16:26.120 --> 0:16:26.560
<v Speaker 3>we in that.

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:31.840
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, it's it's a little bit different but similar, right,

0:16:31.880 --> 0:16:33.600
<v Speaker 7>it's it's going to be number one. It's going to

0:16:33.640 --> 0:16:36.880
<v Speaker 7>be about nailing the operations, and they've worked hard to

0:16:36.960 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 7>make the jobs easier for the barises. You know, part

0:16:39.720 --> 0:16:42.360
<v Speaker 7>of the reason why they're not offering your daughter's favorite

0:16:42.400 --> 0:16:44.480
<v Speaker 7>drink is because they were difficult to make, right, and

0:16:44.480 --> 0:16:47.240
<v Speaker 7>it's because the barisas really didn't personally want to make them.

0:16:47.920 --> 0:16:53.080
<v Speaker 7>They added labor hours into the into the cafes to

0:16:53.160 --> 0:16:56.640
<v Speaker 7>help boost operations, right, and then from there it's it's

0:16:56.720 --> 0:17:00.720
<v Speaker 7>been spending more on marketing. This company has on invested

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 7>for a very long time on marketing, and now you

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:07.280
<v Speaker 7>know they've been able to do that. They sell an

0:17:07.359 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 7>item that's pretty addictive, caffeine, right, but they've under invested

0:17:12.640 --> 0:17:16.200
<v Speaker 7>in marketing for a long time. And Starbucks is starting

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:19.520
<v Speaker 7>to push the gas pedal on that. And it's they're saying,

0:17:19.560 --> 0:17:22.359
<v Speaker 7>it's they're starting to see better transaction data in the

0:17:22.480 --> 0:17:26.359
<v Speaker 7>US and we're starting to lap some really weak results

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:29.960
<v Speaker 7>from last year, and so you know, I think they're

0:17:30.000 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 7>going to start to see some momentum on the top

0:17:32.280 --> 0:17:35.000
<v Speaker 7>line here before Starbucks, especially in the United States.

0:17:35.480 --> 0:17:37.720
<v Speaker 3>All Right, Thanks to Michael Hale and Bloomberg Intelligence Senior

0:17:37.760 --> 0:17:39.119
<v Speaker 3>restaurant and food service analyst.

0:17:39.520 --> 0:17:41.919
<v Speaker 2>We moved next to the news from the tech giant Apple.

0:17:42.320 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 2>This week, Apple said it we'll hire twenty thousand new

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:47.560
<v Speaker 2>workers and invest five hundred billion dollars in the US

0:17:47.600 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 2>over the next four years.

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:51.320
<v Speaker 3>This comes as Apple seeks relief from President Donald Trump's

0:17:51.320 --> 0:17:53.200
<v Speaker 3>tear off some goods imported from China.

0:17:53.440 --> 0:17:55.680
<v Speaker 2>For more, we were joined by Mark Derman, Bloomberg Chief

0:17:55.680 --> 0:17:57.280
<v Speaker 2>correspondent on Global Technology.

0:17:57.359 --> 0:17:59.960
<v Speaker 3>We first asked Mark how this news came about from Apple.

0:18:00.520 --> 0:18:05.439
<v Speaker 8>During the first Trump administration, Tim Cook other companies were

0:18:05.440 --> 0:18:08.639
<v Speaker 8>obviously very worried about tariffs, right, and so their strategy was,

0:18:09.520 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 8>we can try to make a deal here. What does

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:16.479
<v Speaker 8>Trump want? Trump wants his supporters to know or see

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:20.399
<v Speaker 8>that he's bringing jobs back to the US, bringing money

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:23.359
<v Speaker 8>back to the US, bringing manufacturing back to the US.

0:18:24.240 --> 0:18:27.280
<v Speaker 8>Apple doesn't want tariffs on the phone, and it wants

0:18:27.280 --> 0:18:29.800
<v Speaker 8>to keep as much phone manufacturing in China as possible.

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 8>We don't have to get into the reasons why there's

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:35.640
<v Speaker 8>a ton of them. Okay, So you have these two sides, right,

0:18:36.119 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 8>there is a universe in which both parties can get

0:18:38.320 --> 0:18:41.800
<v Speaker 8>exactly what they want. It's like a trade right, and

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:48.480
<v Speaker 8>so you saw that strategy in full form Trump for months, obviously,

0:18:48.520 --> 0:18:51.359
<v Speaker 8>the secondministration has been talking again about bringing back jobs,

0:18:51.760 --> 0:18:55.680
<v Speaker 8>has been talking again about moving things to the US,

0:18:55.720 --> 0:18:58.600
<v Speaker 8>has been talking again about extra tariffs some goods from China.

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:02.680
<v Speaker 8>Aple comes out with the press release We're investing five

0:19:02.760 --> 0:19:05.800
<v Speaker 8>hundred billion dollars in the US over the next four years, which,

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:07.879
<v Speaker 8>by the way, that's.

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:08.720
<v Speaker 5>Trump's term, right.

0:19:08.760 --> 0:19:14.600
<v Speaker 8>He just started, Okay, twenty thousand new jobs, AI server manufacturing,

0:19:14.640 --> 0:19:18.560
<v Speaker 8>Fox con in Houston, doubling our manufacturing fund from five

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:22.480
<v Speaker 8>billion to ten billion, setting up a manufacturing academy like

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 8>a school in Detroit. So you ask yourself, what's really

0:19:25.800 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 8>going on here. They want Trump to know that they're

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 8>investing heavily in the US, and since we're doing that,

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:36.639
<v Speaker 8>we don't want tariffs. And so the spin to Trump

0:19:36.760 --> 0:19:40.440
<v Speaker 8>is that we're doing this because of you. The reality

0:19:40.880 --> 0:19:43.639
<v Speaker 8>is somewhere in the middle. The reality is that Apple

0:19:43.680 --> 0:19:45.760
<v Speaker 8>has been investing as part of its business operations in

0:19:45.800 --> 0:19:49.439
<v Speaker 8>the US from the very beginning. The reality is in

0:19:49.440 --> 0:19:52.400
<v Speaker 8>twenty twenty one, Apple announced the four hundred and thirty

0:19:52.400 --> 0:19:56.720
<v Speaker 8>billion dollar investment in the US. The reality is that

0:19:56.760 --> 0:20:00.280
<v Speaker 8>Apple hires four thousand R and D employees year in

0:20:00.280 --> 0:20:04.359
<v Speaker 8>the US anyways, So what's actually new here? To be

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:07.600
<v Speaker 8>fair to both Trump and Apple, there is a bit

0:20:07.640 --> 0:20:11.160
<v Speaker 8>of an acceleration. So their typical spend on the twenty

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:18.639
<v Speaker 8>twenty one US Investment Plan eighty six billion dollars annually. Okay,

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:22.080
<v Speaker 8>the new plan one hundred and twenty five billion dollars

0:20:22.080 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 8>a year annually. So you're getting a forty billion dollar

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 8>Trump under Trump, and you're moving from four thousand people

0:20:31.359 --> 0:20:33.400
<v Speaker 8>on the R and D side hired annually to five

0:20:33.480 --> 0:20:38.520
<v Speaker 8>thousand people. So incremental, sure, but definitely an acceleration.

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 5>Okay, one minute, is there a quid pro quote here?

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:45.639
<v Speaker 2>Do you think Apple actually already has a deal with

0:20:45.680 --> 0:20:48.119
<v Speaker 2>President Trump that they will be exempt from tariffs?

0:20:48.440 --> 0:20:48.880
<v Speaker 3>No?

0:20:49.000 --> 0:20:52.320
<v Speaker 8>Okay, But Tim Cook went to Donald Trump's office last

0:20:52.359 --> 0:20:55.920
<v Speaker 8>week and presented this to him, said, we're going to

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:59.200
<v Speaker 8>do this because of you man. Oh and by the way,

0:20:59.240 --> 0:21:02.400
<v Speaker 8>we don't want to pay tariffs. And Trump knows that

0:21:03.040 --> 0:21:08.919
<v Speaker 8>Trump doesn't care about giving Apple or a prieve on tariffs.

0:21:08.920 --> 0:21:11.080
<v Speaker 8>He's happy to do it, and he's happy to do

0:21:11.080 --> 0:21:12.720
<v Speaker 8>it and tell people that he did it because Tim

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 8>Cook is investing half a trillion dollars during his presidency.

0:21:17.000 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 8>He can go back to his supporters, his base, he

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:21.240
<v Speaker 8>can go back to Congress. He can go back to

0:21:21.320 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 8>the world and tell them that the world's biggest technology company,

0:21:23.840 --> 0:21:26.480
<v Speaker 8>the most famous company in the world, is investing half

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:30.399
<v Speaker 8>a trillion dollars. It's biggest investment commitment ever, right because

0:21:30.400 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 8>of me and for Trump, that's awesome.

0:21:32.240 --> 0:21:32.480
<v Speaker 5>Yep.

0:21:32.920 --> 0:21:35.159
<v Speaker 8>And for Tim Cook not having to pay tariffs is awesome.

0:21:35.520 --> 0:21:38.400
<v Speaker 8>And I think that's good enough to get some sort

0:21:38.440 --> 0:21:40.600
<v Speaker 8>of tariff for Prieve. And by the way, let's say

0:21:40.600 --> 0:21:44.600
<v Speaker 8>Trump doesn't give them a tariff for Prieve. Who cares? Right,

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:46.760
<v Speaker 8>I was doing this anyways if I'm Tim Cook.

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:50.639
<v Speaker 2>Thanks to Mark Derman, Blueberg Chief correspondent on global technology.

0:21:50.280 --> 0:21:52.480
<v Speaker 3>We move next to earnings from the home improvement retailer

0:21:52.480 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 3>home Depot.

0:21:53.240 --> 0:21:55.720
<v Speaker 2>Home Depot said it expects a key sales metric to

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:58.119
<v Speaker 2>return to growth this year, and this comes despite the

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:01.560
<v Speaker 2>company cautioning that housing the man won't change significantly in

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 2>the near term.

0:22:02.200 --> 0:22:04.640
<v Speaker 3>For more, we were joined by Drew Redding, Bloomberg Intelligence

0:22:04.720 --> 0:22:06.919
<v Speaker 3>US home building analysts. We first asked Drew for his

0:22:07.040 --> 0:22:08.080
<v Speaker 3>take on earnings.

0:22:08.320 --> 0:22:10.920
<v Speaker 9>It was a good quarter for them. Comp sales were

0:22:10.920 --> 0:22:13.320
<v Speaker 9>positive for the first time in eight quarters, so I

0:22:13.320 --> 0:22:15.920
<v Speaker 9>think that's something a lot of people are latching onto

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 9>on a positive indicator moving forward. You know, we came

0:22:18.880 --> 0:22:20.920
<v Speaker 9>into the quarter thinking that they could do a little

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:24.160
<v Speaker 9>bit better than consensus on the comp line, really because

0:22:24.160 --> 0:22:26.280
<v Speaker 9>of some of the positive data we've been seeing coming

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:30.480
<v Speaker 9>through in retail sales, along with the expectation that some

0:22:30.520 --> 0:22:33.000
<v Speaker 9>of the recent hurricane activity would benefit them, and that's

0:22:33.000 --> 0:22:35.639
<v Speaker 9>something they called out. They had about a two hundred

0:22:35.680 --> 0:22:38.680
<v Speaker 9>million dollar benefit from hurricanes, which is about a sixty

0:22:38.680 --> 0:22:42.800
<v Speaker 9>five basis point lift to comp sales. The guidance was

0:22:42.840 --> 0:22:46.119
<v Speaker 9>pretty positive. They're looking for about one percent growth next year,

0:22:46.160 --> 0:22:49.240
<v Speaker 9>which we think is appropriately conservative, and it's pretty much

0:22:49.240 --> 0:22:51.760
<v Speaker 9>in line with what we've heard from some other players

0:22:51.760 --> 0:22:54.399
<v Speaker 9>in the home improvement space who are looking for the

0:22:54.440 --> 0:22:57.640
<v Speaker 9>market to be flat to modestly hire next year. There's

0:22:57.680 --> 0:23:00.760
<v Speaker 9>really no incentive for them to come out be overly

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:03.480
<v Speaker 9>optimistic for next year, given you know, the struggles we're

0:23:03.520 --> 0:23:04.520
<v Speaker 9>still seeing with housing.

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:07.320
<v Speaker 3>I was struck by the fact they said they are

0:23:07.359 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 3>seeing more refis does that mean that people are going

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:12.000
<v Speaker 3>to refly to then spruce up their house.

0:23:12.640 --> 0:23:15.679
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I mean in order for this industry to see

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:18.639
<v Speaker 9>more normalized growth going forward, that's something you're certainly going

0:23:18.720 --> 0:23:21.760
<v Speaker 9>to need to see, is people tapping that home equity

0:23:22.040 --> 0:23:25.679
<v Speaker 9>undertaking larger scale renovations. It's still one of the areas

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:28.199
<v Speaker 9>that's kind of holding back growth. They cite it, you know,

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:32.040
<v Speaker 9>kitchens and baths as a particular area of weakness, and

0:23:32.080 --> 0:23:35.399
<v Speaker 9>the reason is because those projects are typically financed. So

0:23:35.440 --> 0:23:37.560
<v Speaker 9>while they did mention that they saw a little bit

0:23:37.600 --> 0:23:39.919
<v Speaker 9>of improvement, it's still nowhere near you know, what the

0:23:39.960 --> 0:23:41.879
<v Speaker 9>industry would need to see in order to get more

0:23:42.000 --> 0:23:43.320
<v Speaker 9>robust growth going forward.

0:23:43.680 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 2>Hey, Drew, it may shock you to learn that I

0:23:45.840 --> 0:23:50.199
<v Speaker 2>spend very little time in either Home Depot or a Lows.

0:23:51.760 --> 0:23:53.760
<v Speaker 2>How does the street different shape between you too? Because

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:55.399
<v Speaker 2>I'm look at the stocks over the last five years

0:23:55.800 --> 0:23:57.919
<v Speaker 2>they both up, you know, eleven, twelve, thirteen percent on

0:23:57.920 --> 0:24:01.359
<v Speaker 2>a compound of basis to this, I'm sureholders are on HD.

0:24:01.480 --> 0:24:02.640
<v Speaker 2>Do they own Lows as well?

0:24:02.680 --> 0:24:03.480
<v Speaker 5>How do you differentiate?

0:24:03.960 --> 0:24:07.000
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, So the main point of differentiation between the two

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:11.000
<v Speaker 9>is really their customer exposure. You remember, home depot is

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:15.879
<v Speaker 9>about fifty percent DIY fifty percent professional contractor, whereas Lows

0:24:15.960 --> 0:24:20.240
<v Speaker 9>is about seventy percent DIY thirty percent pro customer. You know,

0:24:20.280 --> 0:24:22.919
<v Speaker 9>as we look forward, we think that the primary engine

0:24:22.920 --> 0:24:25.040
<v Speaker 9>of growth for the industry is going to be from

0:24:25.080 --> 0:24:28.119
<v Speaker 9>professional contractors. As you start to look out ahead and

0:24:28.160 --> 0:24:30.360
<v Speaker 9>you do see people tap that home equity, we think

0:24:30.359 --> 0:24:31.879
<v Speaker 9>that's where a lot of the growth is going to

0:24:31.920 --> 0:24:35.200
<v Speaker 9>come from. You know, for Lows, as I mentioned, they've

0:24:35.240 --> 0:24:37.720
<v Speaker 9>really been focused on DIY, but over the last couple

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:40.560
<v Speaker 9>of years, they're starting to transform their business to cater

0:24:40.760 --> 0:24:43.359
<v Speaker 9>more towards that professional contractor because I think they realize

0:24:43.359 --> 0:24:46.600
<v Speaker 9>that's where the growth opportunity is now for for home

0:24:46.640 --> 0:24:49.720
<v Speaker 9>depots specifically. You know, their strategy is to go after

0:24:49.720 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 9>an untapped two hundred billion dollar market for more complex pros,

0:24:53.960 --> 0:24:56.600
<v Speaker 9>which are those looking at you know, larger scale remodeling

0:24:56.640 --> 0:24:59.639
<v Speaker 9>projects that span a lot of product categories, and they

0:24:59.640 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 9>want to con and solidate those contractor vendor relationships so

0:25:03.000 --> 0:25:04.600
<v Speaker 9>they could become the one stop shop.

0:25:04.840 --> 0:25:07.520
<v Speaker 2>So if lumber is such a big part of these businesses,

0:25:07.960 --> 0:25:10.800
<v Speaker 2>what are they saying about tariffs? If I would guess

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:12.920
<v Speaker 2>they get a lot of their lumber from I don't know, Canada.

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:16.440
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, surprisingly, it wasn't really an emphasis of the call

0:25:17.119 --> 0:25:20.159
<v Speaker 9>home depot and Lows are among the largest importers of

0:25:20.200 --> 0:25:23.240
<v Speaker 9>goods as you would expect, but over the last several years,

0:25:23.240 --> 0:25:25.800
<v Speaker 9>I mean, the point is really that since the last

0:25:26.400 --> 0:25:29.640
<v Speaker 9>time this administration put larger tariffs into place, they've really

0:25:29.680 --> 0:25:32.199
<v Speaker 9>diversified their supply chains out of some of the markets

0:25:32.200 --> 0:25:34.919
<v Speaker 9>that are most in dependent, like a China. Now a

0:25:35.040 --> 0:25:37.800
<v Speaker 9>majority of their products, the costs of good is still

0:25:38.640 --> 0:25:42.280
<v Speaker 9>sourced domestically, but they certainly do have exposure to China

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:44.439
<v Speaker 9>and some other markets, and we would expect to see

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:47.040
<v Speaker 9>somewhat of a margin impact, you know, as these tariffs

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:48.200
<v Speaker 9>continue to go through.

0:25:48.440 --> 0:25:51.480
<v Speaker 2>Our Thanks did you're writing Bloomberg Intelligence US homebolding analyst

0:25:51.640 --> 0:25:52.160
<v Speaker 2>coming up on.

0:25:52.119 --> 0:25:54.760
<v Speaker 3>The program and look at how Walmart CEO Doug McMillan

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:56.960
<v Speaker 3>is navigating a second Donald Trum presidency.

0:25:57.200 --> 0:26:00.119
<v Speaker 2>You're listening to Bloomberg Intelligence on Bloomberg Radio, providing in

0:26:00.160 --> 0:26:02.560
<v Speaker 2>depth research and data on two thousand companies and one

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:05.400
<v Speaker 2>hundred and thirty industries. You can access Bloomberg Intelligence via

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:06.560
<v Speaker 2>b I go on the terminal.

0:26:06.680 --> 0:26:09.560
<v Speaker 3>I'm Paul Sweeney and a'm alex Deal and this is Bloomberg.

0:26:16.240 --> 0:26:20.160
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast. Catch the program

0:26:20.240 --> 0:26:23.640
<v Speaker 1>live weekdays at ten am Eastern on Applecarplay and Android

0:26:23.680 --> 0:26:26.679
<v Speaker 1>Auto with the Bloomberg Business app. You can also listen

0:26:26.760 --> 0:26:30.040
<v Speaker 1>live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station.

0:26:30.560 --> 0:26:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Just say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:26:34.160 --> 0:26:38.200
<v Speaker 3>We move now to investor Warren Buffett's multinational conglomerate Berkshire Hathaway.

0:26:38.440 --> 0:26:41.119
<v Speaker 2>The company recently said it's fourth quarter earnings were about

0:26:41.160 --> 0:26:44.800
<v Speaker 2>fourteen billion dollars, higher than analysts expected. Berkshire also said

0:26:44.840 --> 0:26:46.960
<v Speaker 2>that it has more than three hundred and thirty four

0:26:47.080 --> 0:26:49.200
<v Speaker 2>billion dollars in cash, a record high.

0:26:49.320 --> 0:26:52.400
<v Speaker 3>For more. We were joined by Matthew Palazoa, Bloomberg Intelligence

0:26:52.440 --> 0:26:54.160
<v Speaker 3>Senior analyst for P and C Insurance.

0:26:54.320 --> 0:26:56.520
<v Speaker 2>We first asked Matthew what some of the highlights were

0:26:56.520 --> 0:26:57.880
<v Speaker 2>from Berkshire's earnings report.

0:26:58.000 --> 0:27:02.119
<v Speaker 10>Big earnings jump from the year ago due to their

0:27:02.280 --> 0:27:06.040
<v Speaker 10>most exciting and best business in my view, the insurance business.

0:27:06.960 --> 0:27:07.360
<v Speaker 6>There.

0:27:07.880 --> 0:27:12.040
<v Speaker 10>We've been probably talking a while about auto insurance prices

0:27:12.080 --> 0:27:15.120
<v Speaker 10>going up, and that is really showing through in the

0:27:15.119 --> 0:27:18.000
<v Speaker 10>results of auto insurance companies like all Stay, Progressive and

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:21.200
<v Speaker 10>Geico at Berkshire. So that was one of the big drivers.

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:24.960
<v Speaker 10>Another one was their investment income. So they've been selling

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:27.440
<v Speaker 10>a lot of stock, as you said, their cash pile

0:27:27.480 --> 0:27:31.159
<v Speaker 10>which is three hundred and thirty four billion dollars going

0:27:31.440 --> 0:27:35.240
<v Speaker 10>up and up, and the investment income on that has

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:36.680
<v Speaker 10>rose dramatically as well.

0:27:37.280 --> 0:27:38.639
<v Speaker 3>So how much cash does he have now?

0:27:38.760 --> 0:27:42.080
<v Speaker 10>So three hundred and thirty four billion in cash, that's

0:27:42.119 --> 0:27:42.520
<v Speaker 10>just cash.

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:44.000
<v Speaker 3>It's my tiny little brain.

0:27:44.080 --> 0:27:48.040
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, good problem to have, right, you're going up? Yeah,

0:27:48.040 --> 0:27:49.240
<v Speaker 10>I mean, and what has.

0:27:49.119 --> 0:27:51.720
<v Speaker 3>Happened is O can you imagine? Put that in a mark?

0:27:51.800 --> 0:27:52.840
<v Speaker 3>Is fun? What you're throwing off?

0:27:53.200 --> 0:27:56.560
<v Speaker 10>Sure, they're getting about eleven billion dollars in investment income

0:27:56.640 --> 0:27:59.520
<v Speaker 10>a year just on their fixed investments, and that's incredibly

0:27:59.520 --> 0:28:01.280
<v Speaker 10>short term you know T bills.

0:28:01.680 --> 0:28:01.920
<v Speaker 3>Right.

0:28:02.440 --> 0:28:05.440
<v Speaker 2>The reality is the problem, if there is a problem,

0:28:05.960 --> 0:28:08.359
<v Speaker 2>is and it's been this way for years, and there's

0:28:08.400 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 2>just nowhere to put that money. I mean, to find

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:15.080
<v Speaker 2>something of that scale is almost impossible.

0:28:15.119 --> 0:28:17.199
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, he talks a lot about that that there's not

0:28:17.359 --> 0:28:19.600
<v Speaker 10>much they can do to move the needle on results.

0:28:19.880 --> 0:28:22.080
<v Speaker 10>They bought Allegheny a couple of years ago. That was

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:25.560
<v Speaker 10>thirteen billion dollars they've put I don't know the exact number,

0:28:25.560 --> 0:28:31.760
<v Speaker 10>but several billion into these Japanese trading house investments, so

0:28:31.760 --> 0:28:34.720
<v Speaker 10>they've been putting money to work. But none of those

0:28:34.760 --> 0:28:37.520
<v Speaker 10>really moved the needle. And they sold a ton of

0:28:37.520 --> 0:28:40.080
<v Speaker 10>Apple stock they sold in the fourth quarter, particularly, they

0:28:40.080 --> 0:28:42.120
<v Speaker 10>sold a bunch of Bank of America stock, which we

0:28:42.200 --> 0:28:44.360
<v Speaker 10>knew was going to happen, So there weren't really any

0:28:44.360 --> 0:28:49.120
<v Speaker 10>other surprises as far as stock moves. They bought Constellation Brands,

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:52.680
<v Speaker 10>which you know makes beverages. I don't know all that

0:28:52.720 --> 0:28:54.280
<v Speaker 10>much about them. They put about a billion and a

0:28:54.320 --> 0:28:57.440
<v Speaker 10>half to work at that, so we So what.

0:28:57.360 --> 0:28:59.880
<v Speaker 3>Does Warren Buffett say about the market being overvalued or not?

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:03.040
<v Speaker 3>And what does he say about say AI trade?

0:29:03.520 --> 0:29:05.480
<v Speaker 10>Probably not much. He didn't say, you know, nothing that

0:29:05.560 --> 0:29:07.960
<v Speaker 10>I've heard, you know, Warren Buffett and interviews or anything.

0:29:08.000 --> 0:29:10.960
<v Speaker 10>We've got the annual meeting coming up in May, so

0:29:11.040 --> 0:29:14.040
<v Speaker 10>he probably I would be shocked if he doesn't get

0:29:14.120 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 10>one question on AI at least at this point. You know,

0:29:18.240 --> 0:29:24.320
<v Speaker 10>they're not huge investors in tech names, obviously Apple notwithstanding

0:29:26.320 --> 0:29:29.280
<v Speaker 10>the investment managers might be more interested in stuff like that,

0:29:29.360 --> 0:29:32.320
<v Speaker 10>and he does. He had said in his annual letter,

0:29:32.360 --> 0:29:34.920
<v Speaker 10>it won't be long before greg Abel's the CEO, so

0:29:34.960 --> 0:29:37.680
<v Speaker 10>he kind of always acknowledges that and kind of more

0:29:37.680 --> 0:29:38.800
<v Speaker 10>building towards the future.

0:29:39.640 --> 0:29:43.520
<v Speaker 2>So if I'm buying BRK today, Berkshire Hathaway, what's my

0:29:43.600 --> 0:29:44.960
<v Speaker 2>investment theme.

0:29:45.520 --> 0:29:47.880
<v Speaker 10>It's tough because in the earnings I didn't see a

0:29:47.880 --> 0:29:50.239
<v Speaker 10>lot of things that were, you know, telling me, oh,

0:29:50.280 --> 0:29:53.280
<v Speaker 10>this is these are positive signals for the future earnings

0:29:53.320 --> 0:29:58.280
<v Speaker 10>of Berkshire. Necessarily, Berks's got a huge retail ownership, so

0:29:58.320 --> 0:30:00.480
<v Speaker 10>there's kind of some of that moves it. The fact

0:30:00.480 --> 0:30:03.600
<v Speaker 10>that the earnings beat by a lot didn't impress me.

0:30:03.800 --> 0:30:07.000
<v Speaker 10>You know, we knew about Geico improving. They also had

0:30:07.000 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 10>a lot of insurance favorable loss reserve development, which means

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:15.360
<v Speaker 10>they sell the business, their claims come out later, so

0:30:15.400 --> 0:30:17.960
<v Speaker 10>they don't know the claims what happened as their claims

0:30:18.000 --> 0:30:19.640
<v Speaker 10>turned out to be a lot better. But in the

0:30:19.680 --> 0:30:22.440
<v Speaker 10>third quarter they had adverse development. So the things that

0:30:22.480 --> 0:30:26.160
<v Speaker 10>pushed their earnings were not too impressive. The operating businesses

0:30:26.200 --> 0:30:30.200
<v Speaker 10>like the railroad had a one time comp expense in it.

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:32.960
<v Speaker 10>It seems to me like earnings probably will not grow

0:30:33.440 --> 0:30:36.400
<v Speaker 10>in twenty five just because of these items and insurance

0:30:36.760 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 10>and even the other underlying businesses, it'll be modest, if

0:30:41.120 --> 0:30:41.920
<v Speaker 10>much growth at all.

0:30:42.400 --> 0:30:45.800
<v Speaker 3>So because I'm me, I'm really into a warm Buffett's

0:30:45.800 --> 0:30:49.480
<v Speaker 3>steak and Oxy. So it's an oil company, but they're

0:30:49.480 --> 0:30:52.520
<v Speaker 3>also doing a lot of director capture and which basically

0:30:52.520 --> 0:30:53.960
<v Speaker 3>you get carbon out of the air and you put

0:30:53.960 --> 0:30:55.880
<v Speaker 3>it in the ground. But the reason why he has

0:30:55.960 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 3>a stake that he continues to build. But originally it

0:30:58.240 --> 0:31:00.200
<v Speaker 3>was when Oxy was buying in a darko and they

0:31:00.240 --> 0:31:01.920
<v Speaker 3>needed some funding and they needed it fast, and so

0:31:01.960 --> 0:31:04.719
<v Speaker 3>we got a sweetheart deal. The rumor always is that, oh,

0:31:04.760 --> 0:31:05.920
<v Speaker 3>he's going to buy the company.

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:09.400
<v Speaker 10>So he flat out said, I'm not looking to buy

0:31:09.440 --> 0:31:10.840
<v Speaker 10>the whole company. I think it was at the last

0:31:10.880 --> 0:31:13.160
<v Speaker 10>annual meeting and I was writing the day before, maybe

0:31:13.160 --> 0:31:16.600
<v Speaker 10>they'll Buyoxy so and then he came out and literally

0:31:16.640 --> 0:31:18.640
<v Speaker 10>threw cold water on it. They did buy more stock

0:31:19.080 --> 0:31:22.160
<v Speaker 10>in the fourth quarter and the first quarter, and like

0:31:22.200 --> 0:31:25.600
<v Speaker 10>you said, Alex, he made a very typical Buffet deal,

0:31:25.640 --> 0:31:28.040
<v Speaker 10>like this is a company that desperately needs cash, We're

0:31:28.040 --> 0:31:30.480
<v Speaker 10>going to get a great deal from them. But he

0:31:30.640 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 10>has repeatedly talked about the management of the company and

0:31:34.680 --> 0:31:37.480
<v Speaker 10>how he likes how the positions, so I don't think

0:31:37.480 --> 0:31:39.720
<v Speaker 10>it was you know, it wasn't just taking that sweetheart deal.

0:31:39.760 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 10>He does like the forward look of the company. Also,

0:31:42.640 --> 0:31:46.040
<v Speaker 10>Greg Abel, the future CEO, is an energy guy, so

0:31:46.160 --> 0:31:48.160
<v Speaker 10>I assume he played, you know, a big role in

0:31:48.160 --> 0:31:49.000
<v Speaker 10>that whole deal.

0:31:50.440 --> 0:31:51.480
<v Speaker 2>What about this Able guy?

0:31:51.480 --> 0:31:52.080
<v Speaker 5>Do we like him?

0:31:52.360 --> 0:31:54.080
<v Speaker 2>We've not had a few years to get the nome ring.

0:31:54.080 --> 0:31:56.760
<v Speaker 10>I think we like him. We don't know a ton honestly,

0:31:56.840 --> 0:31:59.800
<v Speaker 10>Like Buffett has him with him in interviews, he has

0:32:00.160 --> 0:32:02.640
<v Speaker 10>in the annual meetings. He will be there again, I

0:32:02.680 --> 0:32:04.960
<v Speaker 10>think from they'd said it in the report, he'll be

0:32:04.960 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 10>there for I believe most of the time with Buffett.

0:32:09.160 --> 0:32:11.560
<v Speaker 10>Mostly what I'm going on is how Buffett talks about him.

0:32:11.680 --> 0:32:14.880
<v Speaker 10>Talks about him in terms of capital allocation, you know,

0:32:15.240 --> 0:32:19.080
<v Speaker 10>and he always praises his managers. One thing I think

0:32:19.120 --> 0:32:21.680
<v Speaker 10>you could point to is that Able has taken over

0:32:21.720 --> 0:32:24.040
<v Speaker 10>a lot of the day to day So a lot

0:32:24.080 --> 0:32:28.280
<v Speaker 10>of the managers of the company's Berkshire owns call Buffett

0:32:28.320 --> 0:32:31.720
<v Speaker 10>and he's kind of nicely gently passed them on to Able.

0:32:32.640 --> 0:32:35.360
<v Speaker 10>So you know, if things are going well, they're probably

0:32:35.400 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 10>going well due to greg ables effort all.

0:32:37.160 --> 0:32:40.120
<v Speaker 3>Right, thanks to Matthew Palizola, Bloomberg Intelligence, Senior Analyst for

0:32:40.120 --> 0:32:41.040
<v Speaker 3>P ANDC Insurance.

0:32:41.240 --> 0:32:43.600
<v Speaker 2>This week we focused on a Bloomberg Big Take story

0:32:43.720 --> 0:32:46.560
<v Speaker 2>entitled Walmart Wants to be Something for Everyone in a

0:32:46.680 --> 0:32:49.760
<v Speaker 2>Divided America. You can find it on Bloomberg dot Com

0:32:49.760 --> 0:32:50.520
<v Speaker 2>and The Terminal.

0:32:50.760 --> 0:32:53.120
<v Speaker 3>The story looks at how Walmart's CEO Doug McMillan is

0:32:53.160 --> 0:32:56.520
<v Speaker 3>navigating a second Donald Trump presidency while going after Amazon's

0:32:56.560 --> 0:32:57.600
<v Speaker 3>e commerce crown.

0:32:58.000 --> 0:33:00.160
<v Speaker 2>For more, we were joined by one of the stories authors,

0:33:00.240 --> 0:33:04.560
<v Speaker 2>Devin Leonard, Bloomberg BusinessWeek's senior Global Business writer. First asked

0:33:04.560 --> 0:33:07.280
<v Speaker 2>Devin about how Walmart is trying to position itself today.

0:33:07.720 --> 0:33:09.840
<v Speaker 6>Well, I mean, it's it's a really interesting time to

0:33:09.960 --> 0:33:13.520
<v Speaker 6>be doing a story about Walmart because it's Doug McMillan's

0:33:13.640 --> 0:33:16.000
<v Speaker 6>I guess it's just a little past his first decade,

0:33:16.080 --> 0:33:19.480
<v Speaker 6>and he he took the company through through this transformation.

0:33:19.680 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 6>Just I mean, you know, when he came in twenty fourteen,

0:33:23.120 --> 0:33:25.120
<v Speaker 6>they were just you know, considered it in that clueless.

0:33:25.120 --> 0:33:29.320
<v Speaker 6>They were behind not just Amazon but eBay and Apple,

0:33:29.720 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 6>and you know he sort of turned them into you know,

0:33:32.600 --> 0:33:35.400
<v Speaker 6>an actual you know Amazon rival, you know, at least

0:33:35.520 --> 0:33:37.479
<v Speaker 6>they had a future. So now he's trying to do

0:33:39.560 --> 0:33:41.200
<v Speaker 6>you know, you know, trying to turn it into into

0:33:41.320 --> 0:33:44.440
<v Speaker 6>sort of more of a real tech company with its big,

0:33:44.480 --> 0:33:48.200
<v Speaker 6>expensive campus and also you know all of these you know,

0:33:48.240 --> 0:33:50.920
<v Speaker 6>not just Walmart dot com, but you know, a marketplace

0:33:50.960 --> 0:33:53.840
<v Speaker 6>for a third place sellers, you know, you know, you know,

0:33:53.880 --> 0:33:56.239
<v Speaker 6>online advertising and all those things. And of course, as

0:33:56.280 --> 0:33:58.520
<v Speaker 6>you pointed out, he's trying to do it, you know,

0:33:58.680 --> 0:34:01.960
<v Speaker 6>all at a time when when Donald Trump's come back,

0:34:02.520 --> 0:34:04.720
<v Speaker 6>you know, you know, to you know, to Washington and

0:34:05.480 --> 0:34:09.520
<v Speaker 6>you know, you know, you know, very aggressively pursuing you know,

0:34:09.560 --> 0:34:13.479
<v Speaker 6>the second term term agenda. So so, but you know,

0:34:13.480 --> 0:34:16.200
<v Speaker 6>they're trying to hold on to their to their you know,

0:34:16.640 --> 0:34:19.520
<v Speaker 6>I don't want to say downscale customers, but their core customers,

0:34:19.840 --> 0:34:23.239
<v Speaker 6>while you know, reaching out to you know, up upscale customers,

0:34:23.800 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 6>you know, primarily online and also navigating you know, tariffs,

0:34:28.000 --> 0:34:29.760
<v Speaker 6>you know and all that stuff, but also and also

0:34:30.560 --> 0:34:35.600
<v Speaker 6>kind of moderating his his sort of political positions or

0:34:35.680 --> 0:34:39.000
<v Speaker 6>you know, positions on socialations as CEO. As we've seen

0:34:39.480 --> 0:34:42.720
<v Speaker 6>in the last couple of months, rolling back DEI basically

0:34:42.760 --> 0:34:44.480
<v Speaker 6>not being as critical as Trump, you know, as he

0:34:44.640 --> 0:34:47.200
<v Speaker 6>was during Trump's first administration. So you know, it's a

0:34:47.280 --> 0:34:49.759
<v Speaker 6>it's a difficult kind of balancing act, but that's what

0:34:49.760 --> 0:34:51.000
<v Speaker 6>he's trying to do well.

0:34:51.040 --> 0:34:53.840
<v Speaker 3>Also in the piece, you guys talk about their opening

0:34:53.920 --> 0:34:56.440
<v Speaker 3>of the three hundred and fifty AC or Walmart campus.

0:34:56.880 --> 0:34:59.799
<v Speaker 3>The pictures are amazing. It's not yet done, but they

0:34:59.840 --> 0:35:02.759
<v Speaker 3>have like a fitness center, they have meditation rooms, they

0:35:02.800 --> 0:35:06.160
<v Speaker 3>got pickleball cords, shops, restaurants and brewery like.

0:35:06.480 --> 0:35:11.480
<v Speaker 6>What now, Well, that's I mean, it was it was

0:35:11.480 --> 0:35:13.799
<v Speaker 6>pretty It was pretty fun, you know, I mean, just

0:35:14.000 --> 0:35:16.520
<v Speaker 6>the whole town and has changed a lot thought. I mean,

0:35:16.640 --> 0:35:19.000
<v Speaker 6>you know, Jay One had actually been there a couple

0:35:19.040 --> 0:35:21.200
<v Speaker 6>of times, when more recently because she covers walmartel all

0:35:21.200 --> 0:35:22.759
<v Speaker 6>the time. The last time I was down there was

0:35:22.760 --> 0:35:24.600
<v Speaker 6>two thousand and five when I wrote a cover story

0:35:24.640 --> 0:35:29.440
<v Speaker 6>for one of our competitors about Fortune. But sorry about Fortune.

0:35:29.520 --> 0:35:32.880
<v Speaker 6>Fortune was the magazine, Uh it was. It was a

0:35:32.880 --> 0:35:35.520
<v Speaker 6>piece about Walmart. But but but we spent you know,

0:35:35.560 --> 0:35:39.400
<v Speaker 6>four days down there. The last day we're really really

0:35:39.800 --> 0:35:44.200
<v Speaker 6>on campus and everything. But I mean, you know, both

0:35:44.840 --> 0:35:48.480
<v Speaker 6>both you know, McMillan and Walmart and the Walton family

0:35:48.520 --> 0:35:51.080
<v Speaker 6>who control you know, forty percent of you know the company.

0:35:52.080 --> 0:35:55.720
<v Speaker 6>You know, they're trying to both turn the company and

0:35:55.920 --> 0:35:59.200
<v Speaker 6>Bentonville into a place that will attract you know that

0:35:59.320 --> 0:36:01.960
<v Speaker 6>you know, top town people, you know who from Silicon

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:05.160
<v Speaker 6>Valley who might not have come to Walmart and Bettonville

0:36:05.320 --> 0:36:07.280
<v Speaker 6>other otherwise. So it's all part of a big push

0:36:07.760 --> 0:36:11.040
<v Speaker 6>to do that and to retain people you know, you

0:36:11.040 --> 0:36:13.800
<v Speaker 6>know as they as they become this company that's for

0:36:13.920 --> 0:36:15.800
<v Speaker 6>the top ranks. It's not a bunch of lifers anymore.

0:36:15.800 --> 0:36:18.960
<v Speaker 6>It's people from PayPal, people from Amazon, you know, people

0:36:18.960 --> 0:36:20.839
<v Speaker 6>from Instacart and a lot of stuff. So that's really

0:36:20.880 --> 0:36:21.720
<v Speaker 6>what that's all about.

0:36:22.000 --> 0:36:26.360
<v Speaker 2>And I guess the makeover of Walmart into a really

0:36:26.880 --> 0:36:30.960
<v Speaker 2>extraordinarily competitive digital player in digital retail and digital e commerce,

0:36:31.320 --> 0:36:35.080
<v Speaker 2>competing very well against Amazon. That's not cheap and it

0:36:35.120 --> 0:36:38.680
<v Speaker 2>impacts their margins. I guess they've got a board that

0:36:38.880 --> 0:36:40.040
<v Speaker 2>is supportive of this.

0:36:40.040 --> 0:36:43.520
<v Speaker 6>This fellow, well, that was a really interesting thing because

0:36:44.120 --> 0:36:48.160
<v Speaker 6>we were down there. I guess this was on January seventeenth,

0:36:48.200 --> 0:36:51.040
<v Speaker 6>and there was a press conference where you know McMillan

0:36:51.080 --> 0:36:53.279
<v Speaker 6>and also the you know, the governor of Arkansas, Sarah

0:36:53.320 --> 0:36:56.640
<v Speaker 6>Huckabee Sanders and others gave a whole presentation all you know,

0:36:56.680 --> 0:37:00.320
<v Speaker 6>but the company in the new campus. But meanwhile, Millan

0:37:00.360 --> 0:37:02.080
<v Speaker 6>had given a speech earlier in the day. It was

0:37:02.120 --> 0:37:06.640
<v Speaker 6>just an employee only event. Well we I should actually

0:37:06.680 --> 0:37:09.719
<v Speaker 6>say Jay one jay one did this, but but she

0:37:09.920 --> 0:37:12.680
<v Speaker 6>was able to get you know, you know, recording, you know,

0:37:13.040 --> 0:37:17.560
<v Speaker 6>the earlier speech, and in that uh, you know, you know, McMillan,

0:37:17.600 --> 0:37:21.600
<v Speaker 6>who's very very almost zen like and sort of sort

0:37:21.600 --> 0:37:25.080
<v Speaker 6>of you know, you know, unflappable, gave a more sort

0:37:25.120 --> 0:37:27.960
<v Speaker 6>of spirited speech and you know, and he's basically saying, like,

0:37:28.719 --> 0:37:30.440
<v Speaker 6>you know, we made this transformation, but there's you know,

0:37:30.560 --> 0:37:32.359
<v Speaker 6>was there's so much more we have to do and

0:37:32.400 --> 0:37:34.600
<v Speaker 6>it's really expensive. And he pointed to this chart behind

0:37:34.640 --> 0:37:37.719
<v Speaker 6>him showing how they're you know, operating margins just just

0:37:38.080 --> 0:37:40.520
<v Speaker 6>dropping and they're starting to go up, go up a

0:37:40.560 --> 0:37:43.200
<v Speaker 6>little bit. But but it really was that was pretty incredible,

0:37:43.280 --> 0:37:44.359
<v Speaker 6>he said, you know, he said, I want to thank

0:37:44.400 --> 0:37:48.120
<v Speaker 6>the board for not firing me, because but it was

0:37:48.160 --> 0:37:50.120
<v Speaker 6>it was real. It was really revealing and a great

0:37:50.120 --> 0:37:52.760
<v Speaker 6>thing to have. And you know, kudus to my co.

0:37:52.640 --> 0:37:56.959
<v Speaker 3>Writer thanks to Devin Leonard, Bloomberg BusinessWeek Senior Global Business Writer.

0:37:57.760 --> 0:38:02.440
<v Speaker 1>This is the Bloomberg Intelligence Podcast, available on Apple, Spotify,

0:38:02.640 --> 0:38:06.600
<v Speaker 1>and anywhere else you get your podcasts. Listen live each weekday,

0:38:06.800 --> 0:38:10.080
<v Speaker 1>ten am to noon Eastern on Bloomberg dot com, the

0:38:10.160 --> 0:38:14.040
<v Speaker 1>iHeartRadio app, tune In, and the Bloomberg Business app. You

0:38:14.080 --> 0:38:17.360
<v Speaker 1>can also watch us live every weekday on YouTube and

0:38:17.560 --> 0:38:19.560
<v Speaker 1>always on the Bloomberg terminal