WEBVTT - Do things get more massive the faster they move?

0:00:08.480 --> 0:00:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Daniel, has particle physics done anything useful lately?

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:15.880
<v Speaker 2>M you mean other than revealing the fundamental nature of reality?

0:00:16.040 --> 0:00:16.599
<v Speaker 1>Have you done that?

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:18.919
<v Speaker 2>I mean it's a project.

0:00:21.400 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean that's all nice and cool, but it doesn't

0:00:23.920 --> 0:00:26.640
<v Speaker 1>really help me, you know, with the dishes or you know,

0:00:26.880 --> 0:00:27.520
<v Speaker 1>with my diet.

0:00:27.600 --> 0:00:29.840
<v Speaker 2>I guess we did also invent the World Wide Web.

0:00:29.880 --> 0:00:30.720
<v Speaker 2>That's pretty helpful.

0:00:31.000 --> 0:00:34.879
<v Speaker 1>You mean web surfing. I would say that's not the

0:00:34.880 --> 0:00:36.479
<v Speaker 1>most helpful thing in my life, but that was a

0:00:36.479 --> 0:00:39.040
<v Speaker 1>long time ago. Anyways, what have you done for us recently?

0:00:39.159 --> 0:00:40.919
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, maybe we should be coming up with like a

0:00:41.040 --> 0:00:42.720
<v Speaker 2>fundamental physics diet plan.

0:00:43.680 --> 0:00:46.760
<v Speaker 1>It's just coffee and doughnuts all.

0:00:46.680 --> 0:00:50.519
<v Speaker 2>The time, existential angst about the nature of the universe.

0:00:50.600 --> 0:00:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I guess the problem with physics is that it says

0:00:52.640 --> 0:00:55.279
<v Speaker 1>that the faster you go, the more massive you get. Right,

0:00:55.360 --> 0:00:57.040
<v Speaker 1>that's kind of an anti diet.

0:00:57.120 --> 0:00:59.320
<v Speaker 2>I guess I was thinking, you know, black holes something

0:00:59.360 --> 0:01:01.960
<v Speaker 2>something something liposuction, black holes. I don't know. I didn't

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:02.760
<v Speaker 2>really have it worked out.

0:01:03.520 --> 0:01:05.479
<v Speaker 1>Quantum cosmetic surgery.

0:01:05.600 --> 0:01:08.399
<v Speaker 2>Whoa, Orange County is definitely the place for.

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 1>That, and you can get a ten to the color bage.

0:01:26.400 --> 0:01:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Hi am jorhammy cartoonist and the creator of PhD comics.

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:32.320
<v Speaker 2>Hi. I'm Daniel. I'm a particle physicist and a professor

0:01:32.400 --> 0:01:36.000
<v Speaker 2>at UC Irvine, and I was shocked when a pediatrician

0:01:36.120 --> 0:01:38.399
<v Speaker 2>offered my one year old plastic surgery.

0:01:38.600 --> 0:01:41.520
<v Speaker 1>Wait what they do that on one year.

0:01:41.400 --> 0:01:44.720
<v Speaker 2>Old in Orange County? You're never too young for plastic surgery.

0:01:45.080 --> 0:01:48.160
<v Speaker 1>Oh boy. I get to the offer like a subscription service,

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:51.560
<v Speaker 1>like a membership or something.

0:01:51.840 --> 0:01:54.240
<v Speaker 2>It's a long term relationship. No. Our son had like

0:01:54.280 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 2>a vein on his eyelid and the doctor was like,

0:01:56.680 --> 0:01:57.880
<v Speaker 2>do you want me to remove that?

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:02.840
<v Speaker 1>And we were like, no, please, wait the eyelid or

0:02:02.880 --> 0:02:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the vein. You're like, I think my son needs. It's

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:07.640
<v Speaker 1>his eyelid exactly.

0:02:08.760 --> 0:02:10.720
<v Speaker 2>We were like, I'm pretty sure that's going to be fine,

0:02:11.000 --> 0:02:12.720
<v Speaker 2>And newsflash, he's fine.

0:02:12.880 --> 0:02:14.680
<v Speaker 1>Where You're like, I'm a real doctor, I don't think

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:15.680
<v Speaker 1>he meets any surgery.

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:19.239
<v Speaker 2>I'm not a real doctor, but I'm pretty sure he

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:21.520
<v Speaker 2>didn't need any surgery.

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:23.840
<v Speaker 1>Like, I'm not a real doctor, I just play one

0:02:23.880 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 1>in the lab. But anyways, welcome to our podcast. Daniel

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>and Jorge Explain the Universe, a production of iHeartRadio.

0:02:29.560 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 2>In which we try to show you the nature of

0:02:31.639 --> 0:02:35.040
<v Speaker 2>the universe in all of its unvarnished glory. We don't

0:02:35.040 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 2>want to edit out the ugly bits and smooth over

0:02:37.919 --> 0:02:39.880
<v Speaker 2>the bumps and wrinkles. We want to show you the

0:02:40.000 --> 0:02:43.240
<v Speaker 2>universe the way it actually is, even when it conflicts

0:02:43.320 --> 0:02:46.680
<v Speaker 2>with our intuition and runs aground for our preconceived ideas

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 2>for how things move and flow and dance in the universe.

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:52.520
<v Speaker 1>That's right, that's because we love the universe just the

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:55.760
<v Speaker 1>way it is. We love the og universe, the original

0:02:55.919 --> 0:03:01.240
<v Speaker 1>organic version of the universe, untreated, unvarnished, and pretty mysterious.

0:03:02.880 --> 0:03:05.960
<v Speaker 2>That's right. We prefer the granola crunchy Berkeley version, with

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:08.360
<v Speaker 2>all of its hair and all the original places, even

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:09.560
<v Speaker 2>on all of its black holes.

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:12.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, let's not go too far there. I mean, I'm

0:03:12.960 --> 0:03:15.000
<v Speaker 1>a big fan of socks and sandals, but you know,

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 1>there's a time and a place.

0:03:16.280 --> 0:03:19.160
<v Speaker 2>I'm all for accepting people and universes just the way

0:03:19.200 --> 0:03:19.600
<v Speaker 2>they are.

0:03:19.720 --> 0:03:22.360
<v Speaker 1>But it is a wonderful and beautiful universe. It doesn't

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:24.520
<v Speaker 1>need any cosmic surgery because when we look at it,

0:03:24.600 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>we're just stricken with awe an amazement at how wonderfully

0:03:28.280 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 1>complex and intriguing it all is.

0:03:30.919 --> 0:03:33.280
<v Speaker 2>And one of my favorite things about the universe is

0:03:33.320 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 2>that it's surprising. It's not like we look out into

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:38.560
<v Speaker 2>the universe and we're like, oh, yeah, that's pretty much

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 2>how I expected, or oh yeah, there's nothing new out

0:03:41.000 --> 0:03:44.280
<v Speaker 2>there to discover. Every time we dig deep into something,

0:03:44.560 --> 0:03:47.320
<v Speaker 2>every time we scratch under the surface, we find out, Wow,

0:03:47.400 --> 0:03:49.840
<v Speaker 2>the universe is quite different from the way that we

0:03:49.960 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 2>imagined it, which is wonderful because it's an opportunity to

0:03:52.840 --> 0:03:56.120
<v Speaker 2>learn to discover the truth instead of just coasting on

0:03:56.280 --> 0:03:57.040
<v Speaker 2>our intuition.

0:03:57.440 --> 0:04:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, the universe is very different out there in space,

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:04.000
<v Speaker 1>beyond our galaxy, beyond our cluster of galaxies, and it's

0:04:04.040 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 1>also very different at the molecular and atomic and particle scills.

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Things are actually very different than our everyday experience.

0:04:11.840 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 2>And we're tempted when we discover these new weird wrinkles

0:04:14.880 --> 0:04:17.359
<v Speaker 2>in the universe to explain them in terms of things

0:04:17.360 --> 0:04:19.960
<v Speaker 2>that we know, things we understand. It's a very natural

0:04:20.000 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 2>a way to try to understand the universe, to describe

0:04:22.279 --> 0:04:25.800
<v Speaker 2>it in terms of the language that you already have. Sometimes, though,

0:04:25.800 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 2>that gets awkward. It's hard to understand how quantum particles

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:31.719
<v Speaker 2>dance around if you're thinking about them as little dots

0:04:31.720 --> 0:04:34.159
<v Speaker 2>of stuff, And that's because they're not really little dots

0:04:34.160 --> 0:04:36.960
<v Speaker 2>of stuff. And it's hard to think about velocity and

0:04:37.080 --> 0:04:39.400
<v Speaker 2>energy and mass as things approach the speed of life

0:04:39.440 --> 0:04:42.400
<v Speaker 2>because the definitions of those things have to change, and

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:44.440
<v Speaker 2>the way things move and bounce against each other and

0:04:44.480 --> 0:04:47.680
<v Speaker 2>transfer energy and momentum is really very different at high

0:04:47.720 --> 0:04:50.800
<v Speaker 2>speeds than it is down here in the slow motion

0:04:50.960 --> 0:04:51.719
<v Speaker 2>life on Earth.

0:04:51.960 --> 0:04:54.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, things are very weird and awkward in general when

0:04:54.600 --> 0:04:56.560
<v Speaker 1>you talk to physicists, I feel, not just when you

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:58.599
<v Speaker 1>learn learn what they have to say.

0:04:58.680 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 2>All right, this is not a therapy podcast. We're talking

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:01.880
<v Speaker 2>about the nature of the universe here.

0:05:02.040 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 1>That's right. That's right. In the universe is not awkward

0:05:04.200 --> 0:05:05.599
<v Speaker 1>or weird. It's just the way it is. And I

0:05:05.600 --> 0:05:08.080
<v Speaker 1>guess it's us that are weird and awkward, right, because

0:05:08.160 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 1>we have this picture of how the world works, but

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:12.479
<v Speaker 1>that may not be how the universe actually works.

0:05:12.640 --> 0:05:14.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And in physics, our project is to build a

0:05:14.800 --> 0:05:18.159
<v Speaker 2>mathematical description of how things work in the universe, something

0:05:18.200 --> 0:05:20.480
<v Speaker 2>that lets us make predictions and gives us a peek

0:05:20.480 --> 0:05:23.039
<v Speaker 2>at the machinery behind the curtains that's deciding like what

0:05:23.160 --> 0:05:25.919
<v Speaker 2>happens when two balls bounce against each other. But that

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:29.919
<v Speaker 2>doesn't always translate in an easy or simple way to English,

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 2>the language that most humans speak. So when physicists are

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:36.440
<v Speaker 2>trying to explain how things work when the universe gets weird,

0:05:36.800 --> 0:05:40.080
<v Speaker 2>they use the terms that we're familiar with, mass and energy, momentum,

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:43.040
<v Speaker 2>et cetera, and try to translate the weirdness in those terms.

0:05:43.160 --> 0:05:45.280
<v Speaker 2>And so you hear a lot of explanations for what

0:05:45.360 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 2>happens when things get fast. Some of those explanations are

0:05:48.360 --> 0:05:50.880
<v Speaker 2>bang on, and some of them are a little bit misleading.

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because I guess one of the biggest mind bending

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 1>moments and autism and strangest moments in the history of

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:58.600
<v Speaker 1>science was when we found out that the universe is

0:05:58.680 --> 0:06:02.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of difference once you start are moving really fast exactly.

0:06:02.000 --> 0:06:05.320
<v Speaker 2>We've had Newtonian and Gallean mechanics for centuries, things that

0:06:05.360 --> 0:06:07.640
<v Speaker 2>did a very good job of explaining what happens when

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:10.839
<v Speaker 2>two balls bounce against each other, and how momentum is transferred,

0:06:10.839 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 2>and how things look when you're going fast. If you're

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:15.479
<v Speaker 2>driving in a car at thirty miles an hour, and

0:06:15.520 --> 0:06:17.440
<v Speaker 2>you throw a ball at thirty miles an hour, then

0:06:17.480 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 2>you know that ball should be moving at sixty miles

0:06:19.480 --> 0:06:21.760
<v Speaker 2>an hour relative to the ground. All that stuff made

0:06:21.800 --> 0:06:24.200
<v Speaker 2>sense for a long time until we started looking at

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:26.920
<v Speaker 2>things that weren't moving really really fast. We discovered there's

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:29.360
<v Speaker 2>a speed limit to the universe, and that really changed

0:06:29.440 --> 0:06:32.880
<v Speaker 2>everything we thought about the nature of space and time

0:06:33.080 --> 0:06:35.520
<v Speaker 2>and velocity and gives rise to all sorts of weird

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 2>stuff that's very tricky to unpack.

0:06:37.520 --> 0:06:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, it gets super tricky. Well, first of all, the

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:42.120
<v Speaker 1>idea that we have a speed limit in the universe

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:44.159
<v Speaker 1>is kind of wild. Like, you know, you sort of

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:46.520
<v Speaker 1>grew up thinking that disguise the limit. The more that

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:48.560
<v Speaker 1>you push something, the faster you go. But at some

0:06:48.600 --> 0:06:51.960
<v Speaker 1>point the universe says, I think that's fast enough. It

0:06:51.960 --> 0:06:53.919
<v Speaker 1>doesn't let you go faster than a certain speed.

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:56.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's a really bizarre feature of our universe, one

0:06:56.839 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 2>that we've discovered experimentally at the Michaelson Morley. The experiments

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:03.679
<v Speaker 2>prove that light travels the same speed in every direction

0:07:04.040 --> 0:07:06.799
<v Speaker 2>and effectively demonstrating that there is no absolute reference, framing

0:07:06.800 --> 0:07:10.120
<v Speaker 2>that there is a maximum speed of information and transmission

0:07:10.280 --> 0:07:14.320
<v Speaker 2>in the universe, which leads to all sorts of weird consequences,

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 2>changes what we think about time and the nature of simultaneity.

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 2>Things that happen at the same time for one person

0:07:20.760 --> 0:07:23.480
<v Speaker 2>might happen in a different order for somebody else. The

0:07:23.480 --> 0:07:26.080
<v Speaker 2>whole nature of reality becomes different when there is a

0:07:26.120 --> 0:07:28.120
<v Speaker 2>maximum speed limit to the universe.

0:07:28.520 --> 0:07:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I think it kind of makes people wonder

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:32.840
<v Speaker 1>what would happen if you try to go faster than

0:07:32.880 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 1>the speed of light? Does the universe police come and

0:07:35.080 --> 0:07:38.040
<v Speaker 1>flag you down and stop you? Or do you hit

0:07:38.080 --> 0:07:38.480
<v Speaker 1>a wall?

0:07:38.760 --> 0:07:40.600
<v Speaker 2>Or what are you considering trying to break some laws

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:42.720
<v Speaker 2>of the universe? Be asking for physics legal advice?

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Well, I'm trying to toe the line, you know. I'm

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:47.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of max out my life here. I need to

0:07:47.600 --> 0:07:48.480
<v Speaker 1>know how far I can go.

0:07:50.200 --> 0:07:51.760
<v Speaker 2>I just don't want to be held responsible if you

0:07:51.760 --> 0:07:52.760
<v Speaker 2>get thrown in physics.

0:07:52.560 --> 0:07:54.120
<v Speaker 1>Jail when I need a physics lawyer.

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:56.480
<v Speaker 2>I wonder if people who are lawyers are always on

0:07:56.560 --> 0:07:58.240
<v Speaker 2>the look at for like, is this person asking me

0:07:58.320 --> 0:08:00.000
<v Speaker 2>legal advice? I'm not going to get them in trouble

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 2>if I say the wrong thing. I don't usually have

0:08:01.720 --> 0:08:03.920
<v Speaker 2>to worry about that because most people aren't capable of

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:05.320
<v Speaker 2>trying to break the laws of the universe.

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 1>I think most lawyers don't really care that much.

0:08:10.600 --> 0:08:12.520
<v Speaker 2>But no, there is no physics police that are just

0:08:12.560 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 2>going to pull you over. It's just that acceleration and

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:18.600
<v Speaker 2>momentums start working differently at high speeds. So you discover

0:08:18.840 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 2>that you can pour energy into a particle, it just

0:08:21.160 --> 0:08:23.840
<v Speaker 2>doesn't go much faster. So you can discover that as

0:08:23.880 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 2>things approach the speed of light, you can keep pouring

0:08:25.840 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 2>energy into something a rock, a particle of spaceship, whatever,

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 2>it just doesn't go much faster. The same amount of

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:35.320
<v Speaker 2>energy doesn't get you increases in velocity the same rate.

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 2>It's no longer linear. It becomes asymptotic.

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:45.760
<v Speaker 1>So today end podcast, we'll be tackling the question do

0:08:45.880 --> 0:08:49.640
<v Speaker 1>things get more massive the faster they move? This is

0:08:49.720 --> 0:08:52.320
<v Speaker 1>kind of like the anti diet, or at least I

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:54.839
<v Speaker 1>feel like it justifies maybe sitting down on your couch

0:08:55.000 --> 0:08:57.280
<v Speaker 1>all the time, because if I get up up for

0:08:57.360 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 1>my couch and I move, then I'm just going to

0:08:58.920 --> 0:09:01.200
<v Speaker 1>gain more mass, Right, that's true.

0:09:01.280 --> 0:09:02.880
<v Speaker 2>Well, what we're going to learn on the podcast today

0:09:02.920 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 2>is that it's a little bit more complicated than that

0:09:05.160 --> 0:09:07.520
<v Speaker 2>this is the kind of popular science thing you hear

0:09:07.640 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 2>all the time and people write in and ask me about.

0:09:10.520 --> 0:09:12.319
<v Speaker 2>And I think it was wide they taught in textbooks

0:09:12.360 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 2>until about thirty forty years ago, the feeling that everything

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:17.400
<v Speaker 2>gets weird as you approach the speed of light, and

0:09:17.440 --> 0:09:20.080
<v Speaker 2>then even your mass might change, things might get like

0:09:20.160 --> 0:09:23.280
<v Speaker 2>infinitely heavy as you approach the speed of light. It's

0:09:23.280 --> 0:09:26.040
<v Speaker 2>an attractive concept for people, I think, because it gives

0:09:26.080 --> 0:09:28.520
<v Speaker 2>you a sense of the strange. But as we'll talk

0:09:28.559 --> 0:09:30.480
<v Speaker 2>about today on the podcast, it's a little bit more

0:09:30.520 --> 0:09:33.280
<v Speaker 2>complicated than that, and it's actually something of an outdated notion.

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Wait, wait, are you saying it's a massive lie.

0:09:38.520 --> 0:09:39.959
<v Speaker 2>You know, there's a lot of different ways you can

0:09:39.960 --> 0:09:44.000
<v Speaker 2>try to translate the crisp mathematics of relativity into English

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:47.400
<v Speaker 2>and into popular culture. This was one attempt early on

0:09:47.480 --> 0:09:49.080
<v Speaker 2>that I don't think really works very well.

0:09:49.800 --> 0:09:52.720
<v Speaker 1>I see it was just heavily exaggerated. Well, as usual,

0:09:52.760 --> 0:09:54.960
<v Speaker 1>you were wondering how many people had wondered about this

0:09:55.120 --> 0:09:58.040
<v Speaker 1>question at ask this about themselves, about the universe, about

0:09:58.080 --> 0:09:59.880
<v Speaker 1>what happens when you try to go faster and faster,

0:10:00.080 --> 0:10:02.080
<v Speaker 1>And so Daniel went out there into the Internet to

0:10:02.120 --> 0:10:05.400
<v Speaker 1>ask people do you think things get more massive as

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:06.960
<v Speaker 1>you approach the speed of light?

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 2>I am so grateful to everybody who answers these questions.

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:12.560
<v Speaker 2>They give me a sense for what people already know,

0:10:12.640 --> 0:10:15.280
<v Speaker 2>and they give listeners a sense of what everybody else

0:10:15.400 --> 0:10:18.360
<v Speaker 2>is thinking. If you would like to participate, please don't

0:10:18.400 --> 0:10:20.880
<v Speaker 2>be shy. You're really very welcome to join the club.

0:10:21.360 --> 0:10:24.760
<v Speaker 2>Just write to me two questions at Danielandjorge dot com.

0:10:24.840 --> 0:10:26.800
<v Speaker 1>So think about it for a second. Do you think

0:10:27.120 --> 0:10:28.679
<v Speaker 1>you should stay in your couch if you don't want

0:10:28.720 --> 0:10:31.200
<v Speaker 1>to gain any mess? Here's what people had to say.

0:10:31.400 --> 0:10:35.080
<v Speaker 3>This question just blows my mind. I'm just stumped. Do

0:10:35.200 --> 0:10:39.160
<v Speaker 3>they get more massive? I guess maybe. I don't know how,

0:10:39.280 --> 0:10:41.760
<v Speaker 3>but maybe something related to quantum mechanics.

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:42.120
<v Speaker 4>I don't know.

0:10:42.280 --> 0:10:44.880
<v Speaker 2>As you approached the speed of light, I thought Einstein's

0:10:44.880 --> 0:10:48.840
<v Speaker 2>equations told us that you would gain mess, But to

0:10:48.840 --> 0:10:51.880
<v Speaker 2>an outside observer, I don't think you would actually look bigger.

0:10:52.040 --> 0:10:53.960
<v Speaker 5>I mean, at the speed of lighte time was slower.

0:10:54.480 --> 0:10:57.720
<v Speaker 5>Maybe space gets contracted.

0:10:57.880 --> 0:11:00.760
<v Speaker 2>So I'm kind of stormy here.

0:11:01.240 --> 0:11:03.920
<v Speaker 5>Maybe if that is true, then you will have a

0:11:04.000 --> 0:11:07.319
<v Speaker 5>higher density and in that sense, wibly be more massive.

0:11:07.600 --> 0:11:08.079
<v Speaker 2>Not sure.

0:11:08.280 --> 0:11:12.360
<v Speaker 6>I think they do get more massive, but because it's

0:11:12.640 --> 0:11:16.520
<v Speaker 6>it gets harder to move things at that speed, and

0:11:16.559 --> 0:11:18.840
<v Speaker 6>not because they get more the feet.

0:11:18.960 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 7>My understanding is mass and energy are interchangeable, so the

0:11:22.800 --> 0:11:26.800
<v Speaker 7>more energy you have to pump into something to accelerate

0:11:26.840 --> 0:11:29.520
<v Speaker 7>it closer and closer to the speed of light is

0:11:29.559 --> 0:11:32.920
<v Speaker 7>really no different than making it more massive to begin with.

0:11:33.080 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 7>So I think, yes, it gets more massive as you

0:11:36.920 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 7>approach the speed of light, just because mass and energy

0:11:39.640 --> 0:11:41.439
<v Speaker 7>are essentially the same thing.

0:11:41.920 --> 0:11:44.000
<v Speaker 4>I think I remember hearing that they do get more

0:11:44.000 --> 0:11:47.280
<v Speaker 4>massive as they approach the speed of light. I think

0:11:47.280 --> 0:11:50.560
<v Speaker 4>it takes more energy to increase the speed, and like, yeah,

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:53.280
<v Speaker 4>they just can't really get to the speed of light

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:55.640
<v Speaker 4>unless it's like, you know, massless.

0:11:55.720 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 5>I guess so based on the question. I'm not sure

0:11:58.400 --> 0:12:01.960
<v Speaker 5>exactly why, but if has something to do with like

0:12:02.000 --> 0:12:08.120
<v Speaker 5>the kinetic energy of something affecting its mass, then I

0:12:08.160 --> 0:12:08.920
<v Speaker 5>would guess so.

0:12:09.120 --> 0:12:11.440
<v Speaker 8>I think the answer is yes. First I was taught

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:13.800
<v Speaker 8>it that way. I've since heard that's an old school

0:12:13.800 --> 0:12:18.200
<v Speaker 8>way of thinking about it. But definitely, if we consider

0:12:19.520 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 8>energy as being mass, you know the way it works relativistically,

0:12:25.600 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 8>you can concentrate energy as well as matter, and that

0:12:29.080 --> 0:12:32.319
<v Speaker 8>is all mass energy. Then as you add velocity, you're

0:12:32.360 --> 0:12:34.480
<v Speaker 8>adding energy and you become more massive.

0:12:35.280 --> 0:12:37.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, a lot of great answers here. I feel

0:12:37.640 --> 0:12:40.280
<v Speaker 1>like some people were blown away and some people were like, oh,

0:12:40.280 --> 0:12:43.080
<v Speaker 1>I've heard of this. The answer is yes or no.

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:45.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I thought this was really interesting. There's a lot

0:12:45.559 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 2>of different ideas here about what energy is and what

0:12:48.480 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 2>mass is. Very few people mentioned momentum even, but there's

0:12:52.160 --> 0:12:55.880
<v Speaker 2>definitely this understanding that things change as you approach the

0:12:55.920 --> 0:12:59.480
<v Speaker 2>speed of light, and that it's harder to go faster. Yeah.

0:12:59.559 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Somebody one of the listeners said that it's kind of

0:13:01.960 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 1>strange that your mass would change, right, And that goes to.

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:07.679
<v Speaker 2>The heart of what we mean by mass. I think

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:09.679
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people think of mass is like the

0:13:09.720 --> 0:13:12.800
<v Speaker 2>amount of stuff they have, and so it's really weird

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:15.400
<v Speaker 2>for them to imagine them getting like more stuff as

0:13:15.480 --> 0:13:17.640
<v Speaker 2>they approach the speed of light. And that's one reason

0:13:17.679 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 2>why I really don't like this concept of relativistic mass.

0:13:20.160 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 2>It gives people the impression that something physical is happening,

0:13:23.480 --> 0:13:24.920
<v Speaker 2>which isn't interesting.

0:13:24.960 --> 0:13:27.360
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, let's dig into it, and I guess

0:13:27.400 --> 0:13:29.640
<v Speaker 1>let's start with the basics. As you said, let's start

0:13:29.679 --> 0:13:32.240
<v Speaker 1>with the concept of mass. Now. I know mass is

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:34.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of a big mystery. We talked about it in

0:13:34.559 --> 0:13:36.679
<v Speaker 1>our book, like what is mass? Anyways, we have a

0:13:36.720 --> 0:13:39.439
<v Speaker 1>whole chapter about how we don't kind of know what

0:13:39.480 --> 0:13:41.360
<v Speaker 1>mass is. But Daniel maybe step us through it. What

0:13:41.440 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 1>do we know about what mass is?

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:46.200
<v Speaker 2>I think in the context of relativity and motion, the

0:13:46.200 --> 0:13:49.400
<v Speaker 2>most important thing to think about is inertia, like the

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 2>fact that it's not easy to change your velocity. You're

0:13:52.960 --> 0:13:55.920
<v Speaker 2>flying through the universe at some speed. In order to

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:58.960
<v Speaker 2>change that speed, you need a push. Right. That's really

0:13:58.960 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 2>what F equals is trying to say that to accelerate,

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:05.360
<v Speaker 2>you need to have a force applied to you, and

0:14:05.360 --> 0:14:08.280
<v Speaker 2>that M in that equation, and F equals MA is

0:14:08.320 --> 0:14:11.240
<v Speaker 2>the mass. It relates how much acceleration you get for

0:14:11.559 --> 0:14:13.800
<v Speaker 2>how much force. We've all heard, for example, that the

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:16.439
<v Speaker 2>Earth's gravity on you is the same as your gravity

0:14:16.520 --> 0:14:19.400
<v Speaker 2>on the Earth, Right, But we feel a much stronger

0:14:19.440 --> 0:14:21.440
<v Speaker 2>force than the Earth does because the Earth has a

0:14:21.600 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 2>huge mass. So we feel a much stronger acceleration than

0:14:24.760 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 2>the Earth does because the Earth has a huge mass,

0:14:27.840 --> 0:14:30.560
<v Speaker 2>and so its acceleration is tiny. Even though the force

0:14:30.720 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 2>is the same. So really important concept in mass is inertia.

0:14:33.960 --> 0:14:36.520
<v Speaker 2>That's really what mass is about when we're talking about motion,

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:40.480
<v Speaker 2>and that's connected to this idea of momentum. Right. Another

0:14:40.480 --> 0:14:43.200
<v Speaker 2>way to think about F equals MA is that F

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:46.080
<v Speaker 2>is actually a change in momentum. When you're flying through

0:14:46.080 --> 0:14:49.200
<v Speaker 2>the universe at a certain velocity, you have a certain momentum.

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:51.480
<v Speaker 2>In order to change your momentum, you need to have

0:14:51.600 --> 0:14:54.360
<v Speaker 2>a force applied. So mass is this concept that tells

0:14:54.400 --> 0:14:58.360
<v Speaker 2>us basically how hard it is to change your momentum.

0:14:58.360 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 1>I feel like you're making us go that a rabbit

0:15:00.480 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 1>hole a little bit, because then it makes me wonder, like,

0:15:02.960 --> 0:15:04.240
<v Speaker 1>what is momentum anyways?

0:15:04.400 --> 0:15:07.000
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, a momentum is something we know is important in

0:15:07.040 --> 0:15:09.680
<v Speaker 2>the universe. It's a quantity that's conserved. Like we look

0:15:09.680 --> 0:15:12.480
<v Speaker 2>at in the universe, we watch stuff, we see things happen,

0:15:12.680 --> 0:15:15.080
<v Speaker 2>and we look for patterns, and a very important pattern

0:15:15.120 --> 0:15:18.760
<v Speaker 2>are conservation laws. Things that don't change. So two balls

0:15:18.760 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 2>bounce against each other, for example, you calculate all the

0:15:21.200 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 2>momentum beforehand and all the momentum afterwards, and you notice

0:15:23.880 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 2>it's the same. It is conserved. We actually know that

0:15:26.320 --> 0:15:28.880
<v Speaker 2>there's a deep reason for why momentum is conserved. It's

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:32.000
<v Speaker 2>because space is the same everywhere. We did a whole

0:15:32.000 --> 0:15:34.680
<v Speaker 2>fun podcast on Nother's theorem, which tells you that because

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:37.359
<v Speaker 2>space is the same everywhere, momentum has to be conserved.

0:15:37.600 --> 0:15:40.520
<v Speaker 2>This is deep link there. So momentum is an important

0:15:40.520 --> 0:15:43.400
<v Speaker 2>physical quantity in the universe. It's something that's really powerful

0:15:43.440 --> 0:15:45.480
<v Speaker 2>and it really gives us insight into what's happened. And

0:15:45.560 --> 0:15:48.520
<v Speaker 2>momentum is flowing through a system, right, but it's conserved

0:15:48.520 --> 0:15:51.720
<v Speaker 2>in the universe. The universe at least thinks momentum is important,

0:15:51.760 --> 0:15:53.000
<v Speaker 2>so maybe we should.

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 1>Also well, how is it different from like energy? And

0:15:56.400 --> 0:15:59.240
<v Speaker 1>is momentum the same as energy? Is the momentum of

0:15:59.280 --> 0:16:02.640
<v Speaker 1>a particle or a baseball the same as its kinetic energy?

0:16:02.720 --> 0:16:03.640
<v Speaker 1>How do the two connect?

0:16:03.760 --> 0:16:07.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah? Great question. First of all, momentum has directionality. You

0:16:07.680 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 2>can have a momentum in one direction or momentum in

0:16:09.600 --> 0:16:12.400
<v Speaker 2>another direction. It's a vector it points and for example,

0:16:12.520 --> 0:16:15.760
<v Speaker 2>the Earth has a constant magnitude momentum, but the direction

0:16:15.880 --> 0:16:18.320
<v Speaker 2>of its momentum is changing as it goes around the Sun.

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:20.760
<v Speaker 2>It's like an arrow that tells you which way the

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 2>Earth is headed, and that's constantly changing. So the length

0:16:23.560 --> 0:16:26.440
<v Speaker 2>of that vector isn't changing, but the direction of it is.

0:16:27.000 --> 0:16:29.800
<v Speaker 2>And that's why it takes acceleration to move around the Sun,

0:16:29.880 --> 0:16:32.680
<v Speaker 2>because you're changing the direction of that momentum vector. So

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:35.880
<v Speaker 2>momentum is a direction, right. Energy doesn't have a direction,

0:16:35.920 --> 0:16:38.760
<v Speaker 2>it's just a number, right. And also, and energy includes

0:16:38.800 --> 0:16:42.000
<v Speaker 2>something else. The energy of an object has two components.

0:16:42.040 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 2>There's the internal energy what we call it's inertial mass,

0:16:45.040 --> 0:16:48.720
<v Speaker 2>and the energy of its motion, it's kinetic energy. So

0:16:48.760 --> 0:16:51.640
<v Speaker 2>there's two separate components there. So things could have energy

0:16:51.680 --> 0:16:54.320
<v Speaker 2>when they're not moving, like an electron just sitting there

0:16:54.520 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 2>has some mass, then that corresponds to some energy, and

0:16:57.280 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 2>there's also energy of motion. Things can have only energy

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:03.440
<v Speaker 2>of motion, like a photon is just motion energy has

0:17:03.480 --> 0:17:06.120
<v Speaker 2>no mass, or they can have both, like an electron

0:17:06.160 --> 0:17:09.159
<v Speaker 2>flying through the universe has mass and that's energy and

0:17:09.320 --> 0:17:12.400
<v Speaker 2>also has kinetic energy. So energy has two components. There's

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:15.200
<v Speaker 2>the mass and there's a contribution from the momentum, which

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:16.639
<v Speaker 2>we also call kinetic energy.

0:17:16.720 --> 0:17:19.879
<v Speaker 1>And so the universe conserves both things, right, like it

0:17:19.960 --> 0:17:24.680
<v Speaker 1>somehow conserves momentum, and it also conserves energy, but not

0:17:24.720 --> 0:17:26.640
<v Speaker 1>necessarily the same way I think, right.

0:17:26.600 --> 0:17:29.720
<v Speaker 2>So there's a little asterisk there in flat space. Yes,

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:33.639
<v Speaker 2>energy is conserved in the global universe. As space expands,

0:17:33.880 --> 0:17:37.560
<v Speaker 2>actually energy increases, so energy is not strictly conserved in

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:40.160
<v Speaker 2>the universe. There's a whole podcast episode we did about

0:17:40.160 --> 0:17:41.880
<v Speaker 2>that if you want to dig into it. But let's

0:17:41.920 --> 0:17:44.119
<v Speaker 2>just assume we're like living in flat space and we're

0:17:44.160 --> 0:17:46.480
<v Speaker 2>bouncing balls and particles off each other. We wouldn't notice

0:17:46.480 --> 0:17:48.359
<v Speaker 2>the expansion of the universe. So let's just say for

0:17:48.400 --> 0:17:50.840
<v Speaker 2>the sake of this discussion that, yes, energy is conserved.

0:17:50.880 --> 0:17:54.160
<v Speaker 2>And so you're right, momentum is conserved and energy is conserved,

0:17:54.240 --> 0:17:57.480
<v Speaker 2>and those are actually related. Those are four separate conservation

0:17:57.600 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 2>laws because energy is one number and momentum is three numbers.

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 2>Because we have three dimensions of space, and momentums can

0:18:04.119 --> 0:18:07.359
<v Speaker 2>serve separately in each of those dimensions. So we have

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:11.000
<v Speaker 2>four conservation laws, three from momentum and one from energy.

0:18:11.119 --> 0:18:13.399
<v Speaker 2>And in particle physics at least we group energy and

0:18:13.440 --> 0:18:16.000
<v Speaker 2>momentum together into something we call four momentum, like the

0:18:16.000 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 2>four dimensions of space time, and we say there's conservation

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:22.280
<v Speaker 2>of form momentum, which combines momentum and energy into one

0:18:22.359 --> 0:18:23.200
<v Speaker 2>conservation law.

0:18:23.520 --> 0:18:27.320
<v Speaker 1>So then mass is related to both things, like mass

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:29.879
<v Speaker 1>makes your momentum go higher and it makes your energy

0:18:29.880 --> 0:18:30.320
<v Speaker 1>go higher.

0:18:30.400 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's right. So mass is like your internal stored energy.

0:18:33.080 --> 0:18:35.760
<v Speaker 2>Take a proton, for example, it has a bunch of mass.

0:18:35.800 --> 0:18:37.320
<v Speaker 2>Where does that mass come from. It comes from the

0:18:37.320 --> 0:18:40.119
<v Speaker 2>internal energy of the proton, Like there's the mass of

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:42.200
<v Speaker 2>the quarks. They get their mass from the Higgs boson.

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:44.800
<v Speaker 2>Then there's the mass of the binding of those quarks together,

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:47.000
<v Speaker 2>and that's where most of the mass of the proton

0:18:47.080 --> 0:18:49.720
<v Speaker 2>comes from. So that proton has mass, and you're right,

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:52.720
<v Speaker 2>that's part of its energy, and the proton could also

0:18:52.840 --> 0:18:55.800
<v Speaker 2>have momentum that's another part of its energy. So we

0:18:55.800 --> 0:18:58.119
<v Speaker 2>think of the mass as the thing that makes it

0:18:58.160 --> 0:19:00.200
<v Speaker 2>hard to push on something or easier to put push

0:19:00.240 --> 0:19:02.240
<v Speaker 2>on something but has low mass, and then there's also

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:03.879
<v Speaker 2>energy stored in its motion.

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So then generally speaking, mass is just what makes

0:19:07.160 --> 0:19:09.440
<v Speaker 1>things harder to move, right.

0:19:09.600 --> 0:19:12.840
<v Speaker 2>Basically, that's exactly right. That's the concept of inertial mass

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:15.800
<v Speaker 2>basically relate to the objects inertia, which tells you how

0:19:15.840 --> 0:19:17.919
<v Speaker 2>hard is it to change its momentum.

0:19:18.080 --> 0:19:21.119
<v Speaker 1>Right, And then there's a concept of gravitational mass, which

0:19:21.200 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 1>is a different concept, but it's the same number.

0:19:24.000 --> 0:19:26.120
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, And there's a bunch of really fascinating wrinkles here.

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:29.120
<v Speaker 2>Like in Newton's world, he had F equals maa, which

0:19:29.160 --> 0:19:30.879
<v Speaker 2>tells you about how hard it is to push something.

0:19:31.160 --> 0:19:33.920
<v Speaker 2>And he also had this number m in his gravitational

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 2>law gmm over r square, which tells you the force

0:19:37.160 --> 0:19:40.720
<v Speaker 2>between two objects. And in Newtonian physics, these two things

0:19:40.760 --> 0:19:43.240
<v Speaker 2>are different numbers. They're written in the same way, the

0:19:43.280 --> 0:19:46.240
<v Speaker 2>same letter M in F equals ma and M in

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:49.760
<v Speaker 2>gmm over r squared. But in principle they could have

0:19:49.800 --> 0:19:51.879
<v Speaker 2>been totally different, right. It was a bit of a

0:19:51.920 --> 0:19:55.240
<v Speaker 2>mystery in Newtonian physics why these two numbers always seem

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:58.199
<v Speaker 2>to have the same value. Einstein unified these things in

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:02.200
<v Speaker 2>general relativity and told us that actually inertial gravitational masses

0:20:02.320 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 2>have to be the same because the corner to Einstein,

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 2>there is no acceleration due to gravity. There is no

0:20:07.680 --> 0:20:12.080
<v Speaker 2>force due to gravity. It's just inertial motion through curved

0:20:12.119 --> 0:20:15.440
<v Speaker 2>space time that when you are having inertial motion, there's

0:20:15.480 --> 0:20:19.080
<v Speaker 2>no forces on you through space time. That's what gravity

0:20:19.119 --> 0:20:21.919
<v Speaker 2>looks like. So motion due to gravity is actually just

0:20:22.000 --> 0:20:24.280
<v Speaker 2>inertial motion and you're just really in free fall.

0:20:24.560 --> 0:20:27.240
<v Speaker 1>Right, So like, for example, the Earth orbiting around the Sun.

0:20:27.280 --> 0:20:31.160
<v Speaker 1>It's not like there's a force pulling the Earth towards

0:20:31.200 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the Sun, or there's no centripetal force there is, just

0:20:33.840 --> 0:20:37.159
<v Speaker 1>that the space around the Sun for the Earth is

0:20:37.200 --> 0:20:41.119
<v Speaker 1>sort of curved and it's shaped like a circle basically.

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:43.080
<v Speaker 2>Right, Yeah, that's right. If space were flat, everything we

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:45.359
<v Speaker 2>just move in what looks to us like straight lines.

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:48.439
<v Speaker 2>But when space is curved, things move differently and it

0:20:48.520 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 2>looks like there's a force there bending their paths. But

0:20:51.600 --> 0:20:55.000
<v Speaker 2>really it's just motion through curved space. Because we can't

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:57.720
<v Speaker 2>see that curvature. You can like look through space and

0:20:57.840 --> 0:20:59.920
<v Speaker 2>see the curvature of space the way you can see

0:21:00.119 --> 0:21:01.960
<v Speaker 2>curvature of a road. It seems like a bit of

0:21:02.000 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 2>a mystery why things are moving in curves, and of

0:21:04.800 --> 0:21:07.120
<v Speaker 2>course is that space is curved, so there's an apparent

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:08.120
<v Speaker 2>force there, or.

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:10.720
<v Speaker 1>More accurately, you mean like space time, right, Like maybe

0:21:10.760 --> 0:21:12.600
<v Speaker 1>space is not curve, but space time is.

0:21:12.760 --> 0:21:15.399
<v Speaker 2>It's definitely more coherent to think about relativity in terms

0:21:15.400 --> 0:21:18.240
<v Speaker 2>of space time because the way like energy and momentum

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:20.880
<v Speaker 2>are linked, space and time are definitely linked. You can't

0:21:20.920 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 2>talk about the curvature of space as well and the

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:26.440
<v Speaker 2>curvature of time separately. They make more sense when you

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:28.960
<v Speaker 2>think about them together. But yes, space itself can also

0:21:29.000 --> 0:21:30.880
<v Speaker 2>be curved, but space time as well.

0:21:30.920 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 1>All right, So then that's mess. It's how hard it

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:36.399
<v Speaker 1>is to push on something, and it's also sort of

0:21:36.440 --> 0:21:39.639
<v Speaker 1>like the effect something has on space time around it.

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:42.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and this is very intuitive if you're like playing billiards,

0:21:42.520 --> 0:21:45.480
<v Speaker 2>or you're shooting a basketball, or you're rolling rocks down hills,

0:21:45.480 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 2>and it's aligns with our sense that like things that

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:51.360
<v Speaker 2>have more stuff to them are harder to push, and

0:21:51.400 --> 0:21:53.840
<v Speaker 2>that all makes sense at low speeds. Things change a

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:56.520
<v Speaker 2>little bit as you get very high velocity, and then

0:21:56.560 --> 0:21:58.480
<v Speaker 2>you have a question for like, what do you change

0:21:58.560 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 2>you change momentum, do you change maths, change energy? What's

0:22:01.560 --> 0:22:03.800
<v Speaker 2>the most sensible way to think about these things?

0:22:04.040 --> 0:22:06.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because, as we mentioned, there's the idea out there

0:22:06.640 --> 0:22:08.919
<v Speaker 1>that the faster you go, and as you approach the

0:22:08.920 --> 0:22:11.960
<v Speaker 1>speed of light, your mass starts to get bigger and bigger,

0:22:12.080 --> 0:22:14.359
<v Speaker 1>which is a problem for us who are trying to

0:22:14.400 --> 0:22:18.320
<v Speaker 1>stay slim, and so let's dig into that scenario and

0:22:18.480 --> 0:22:21.160
<v Speaker 1>the problems with that scenario and what it all means

0:22:21.200 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 1>about the loss of the universe. But first, let's take

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:38.960
<v Speaker 1>a quick break. All right. We are talking about a

0:22:39.040 --> 0:22:42.119
<v Speaker 1>massive topic here, and it's going by really fast, and

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:46.680
<v Speaker 1>it's about how really massive things go really fast. Things

0:22:46.720 --> 0:22:48.240
<v Speaker 1>get massive as they go really fast.

0:22:48.359 --> 0:22:50.720
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, things definitely do change as you approach the speed

0:22:50.760 --> 0:22:52.680
<v Speaker 2>of light, and a lot of your intuition goes out

0:22:52.720 --> 0:22:55.920
<v Speaker 2>the window. You can just lean into the mathematics and say, well,

0:22:55.960 --> 0:22:57.840
<v Speaker 2>there are new formulas and I can just use them

0:22:57.880 --> 0:22:59.480
<v Speaker 2>and calculate stuff. But we also want to have like

0:22:59.480 --> 0:23:02.200
<v Speaker 2>an understanding of how the universe works. We want to

0:23:02.240 --> 0:23:05.960
<v Speaker 2>develop a new intuition. So it's important that we make

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:08.280
<v Speaker 2>sense of what the words mean as things change.

0:23:08.840 --> 0:23:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so let's talk about change. I guess now, before

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:14.560
<v Speaker 1>when we just had Newtonian physics, things were kind of simple,

0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:17.200
<v Speaker 1>like if you wanted to change the velocity of something,

0:23:18.000 --> 0:23:20.879
<v Speaker 1>you had to apply a certain force, and a certain

0:23:20.880 --> 0:23:24.600
<v Speaker 1>force would always give you the same amount of velocity change,

0:23:24.760 --> 0:23:27.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of like no matter if you're standing still or

0:23:27.040 --> 0:23:29.480
<v Speaker 1>if you're going fast. If you applied and have you

0:23:29.520 --> 0:23:32.199
<v Speaker 1>always got that change in velocity acceleration.

0:23:32.359 --> 0:23:35.080
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's right, F used to equal M in a

0:23:35.200 --> 0:23:38.400
<v Speaker 2>very simple and straightforward way. Or equivalently, we could say

0:23:38.600 --> 0:23:40.440
<v Speaker 2>F is the change in momentum.

0:23:40.600 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Right, So that's Newtonian physics. But then we sort of

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:45.800
<v Speaker 1>learned a little bit more about relativity, which says that

0:23:45.800 --> 0:23:46.720
<v Speaker 1>that's not quite true.

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:49.880
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, because there is a maximum speed to the universe.

0:23:50.160 --> 0:23:52.639
<v Speaker 2>If you pour energy into something trying to get it

0:23:52.680 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 2>going faster, you don't always get the same amount of

0:23:56.000 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 2>speed up, which means like it's harder to add velocity

0:23:59.680 --> 0:24:03.160
<v Speaker 2>in the direction something is moving. You have rocket ship

0:24:03.160 --> 0:24:05.040
<v Speaker 2>and it's already going at ninety percent of the speed

0:24:05.080 --> 0:24:07.600
<v Speaker 2>of light, and you fire the engines the same amount

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:09.640
<v Speaker 2>you did earlier, you're not going to get the same

0:24:09.680 --> 0:24:12.800
<v Speaker 2>amount of speed up even if you're applying the same.

0:24:12.640 --> 0:24:15.360
<v Speaker 1>Force, right, Because I guess under Newtonian physics, you could

0:24:15.359 --> 0:24:19.080
<v Speaker 1>technically go infinitely fast, right, Like if you just kept

0:24:19.160 --> 0:24:22.440
<v Speaker 1>pushing on an object over a long long period of time,

0:24:22.520 --> 0:24:24.840
<v Speaker 1>we just keep going faster and faster and faster because

0:24:24.960 --> 0:24:27.280
<v Speaker 1>F equals ma A And so if I apply a

0:24:27.359 --> 0:24:30.440
<v Speaker 1>constant force to something the velocity is going to keep increasing,

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:33.679
<v Speaker 1>increasing and increasing, and eventually you would go faster than

0:24:33.720 --> 0:24:35.719
<v Speaker 1>the speed of light in a Newtonian universe.

0:24:35.800 --> 0:24:36.800
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's exactly right.

0:24:36.920 --> 0:24:39.119
<v Speaker 1>But we seem to have this speed limit that says

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:41.840
<v Speaker 1>you can go faster and faster, and so I guess

0:24:41.920 --> 0:24:43.760
<v Speaker 1>my question is what happened then? Did we have to

0:24:43.800 --> 0:24:46.840
<v Speaker 1>adjust our math or does the math tell you why

0:24:46.840 --> 0:24:48.359
<v Speaker 1>you can't go faster than the speed of light.

0:24:48.440 --> 0:24:51.560
<v Speaker 2>We definitely had to adjust our math, right, because those

0:24:51.560 --> 0:24:53.640
<v Speaker 2>formulas are wrong. As you say, they predict you could

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:57.719
<v Speaker 2>go infinitely fast. So what was wrong about those formulas? Well,

0:24:57.760 --> 0:25:01.000
<v Speaker 2>it turns out our formula form momentum was wrong. We

0:25:01.040 --> 0:25:03.760
<v Speaker 2>thought momentum was just like mass times velocity, and then

0:25:03.800 --> 0:25:07.480
<v Speaker 2>we thought that quantity was conserved in the universe. Turns

0:25:07.520 --> 0:25:10.399
<v Speaker 2>out we were missing a term. There's another term in

0:25:10.440 --> 0:25:13.320
<v Speaker 2>that equation, this thing we call the boost factor. We

0:25:13.400 --> 0:25:15.560
<v Speaker 2>write it as gamma in relativity. It's just a number,

0:25:15.560 --> 0:25:17.480
<v Speaker 2>but if you're going at slow speeds, that number is

0:25:17.520 --> 0:25:20.000
<v Speaker 2>basically one, so it doesn't change your equation. But as

0:25:20.040 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 2>you approach to the speed of light, that number grows

0:25:22.320 --> 0:25:24.959
<v Speaker 2>to infinity. So what it means is momentum is different

0:25:25.000 --> 0:25:27.320
<v Speaker 2>from what we thought it was. We talked about how

0:25:27.359 --> 0:25:30.480
<v Speaker 2>momentum is this important quantity in the universe that's conserved.

0:25:30.600 --> 0:25:33.520
<v Speaker 2>That's true, but it's not M times V. There's a

0:25:33.520 --> 0:25:36.800
<v Speaker 2>different expression for momentum, and that's the thing that's actually

0:25:36.800 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 2>conserved in the universe. It turns out M times V

0:25:40.080 --> 0:25:44.199
<v Speaker 2>times this gamma factor. So momentum changes as you approach

0:25:44.240 --> 0:25:47.159
<v Speaker 2>the speed of light, and that's why it's harder to

0:25:47.280 --> 0:25:50.360
<v Speaker 2>increase your velocity as you approach the speed of light,

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:54.119
<v Speaker 2>because your momentum is changing. It requires a larger force

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:55.640
<v Speaker 2>to change your momentum.

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:58.840
<v Speaker 1>I guess this is where it gets kind of confusing, because,

0:25:59.480 --> 0:26:01.399
<v Speaker 1>first of all, all like you're saying that as I

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:05.439
<v Speaker 1>go faster, my momentum decreases, But doesn't that depend on

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:08.520
<v Speaker 1>how fast I'm going relative to who or what? Like?

0:26:08.560 --> 0:26:10.360
<v Speaker 1>To me, I'm not going fast at all. If I'm

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:12.399
<v Speaker 1>going really fast. To me, it just looks like the

0:26:12.520 --> 0:26:14.240
<v Speaker 1>universe is moving around me.

0:26:14.720 --> 0:26:17.119
<v Speaker 2>So, first of all, as you go faster, your momentum

0:26:17.200 --> 0:26:20.600
<v Speaker 2>still increases. That's always true, it's just not a linear increase.

0:26:20.720 --> 0:26:23.320
<v Speaker 2>And you're absolutely right that all of these things depend

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:26.320
<v Speaker 2>on your frame right, depends on who's watching. Somebody who's

0:26:26.359 --> 0:26:27.920
<v Speaker 2>in a spaceship with you is going to see you

0:26:27.960 --> 0:26:30.840
<v Speaker 2>at zero velocity, and somebody who's on Earth as you

0:26:30.960 --> 0:26:32.760
<v Speaker 2>zip by, it's going to see you moving at very

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:34.919
<v Speaker 2>high speed. So you're absolutely right. There's no sense of

0:26:35.040 --> 0:26:38.360
<v Speaker 2>talking about, like, what is my velocity in an absolute way.

0:26:38.400 --> 0:26:41.359
<v Speaker 2>It's always measured relative to some observer. So there's an

0:26:41.359 --> 0:26:44.959
<v Speaker 2>important difference between things that are invariant, where everybody agrees

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:47.680
<v Speaker 2>on them no matter their velocity, and things that are conserved,

0:26:48.200 --> 0:26:51.240
<v Speaker 2>things that don't change in a frame of reference. So momentum,

0:26:51.240 --> 0:26:54.920
<v Speaker 2>for example, is conserved for some observer. You always see

0:26:54.960 --> 0:26:59.159
<v Speaker 2>momentum conserved, like before collision. After collision is the same momentum,

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:02.399
<v Speaker 2>but momentum is not invariant. Another observer moving at a

0:27:02.440 --> 0:27:05.320
<v Speaker 2>different speed will see a different set of momentum, but

0:27:05.400 --> 0:27:09.120
<v Speaker 2>they will also see momentum conserved. So momentum is conserved,

0:27:09.400 --> 0:27:12.720
<v Speaker 2>meaning for a given observer it doesn't ever disappear or appear,

0:27:13.200 --> 0:27:16.480
<v Speaker 2>but it's not invariant, meaning different people will measure different

0:27:16.520 --> 0:27:18.040
<v Speaker 2>amounts at different velocities.

0:27:19.200 --> 0:27:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so then I think what you're saying is that

0:27:21.320 --> 0:27:24.960
<v Speaker 1>momentum is not linear. It gets kind of wonky the

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:27.240
<v Speaker 1>faster you go. And the way it gets wonky is

0:27:27.240 --> 0:27:30.400
<v Speaker 1>that it gets kind of ridiculously big as you get

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:33.200
<v Speaker 1>closer to the speed of light. Right, you said, momentum

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:37.800
<v Speaker 1>equals mass time velocity times gamma, and gamma is basically

0:27:37.880 --> 0:27:40.959
<v Speaker 1>one when we're standing still, but it gets to infinity

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:42.760
<v Speaker 1>as we get closer to the speed of light.

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:45.200
<v Speaker 2>Exactly. And if you think about force not just as

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:48.639
<v Speaker 2>mass times acceleration, but as the change in momentum, then

0:27:48.680 --> 0:27:51.879
<v Speaker 2>if your momentum is really really big, then it becomes

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:54.600
<v Speaker 2>hard to change your momentum. You need to apply a

0:27:54.640 --> 0:27:57.560
<v Speaker 2>really really big force to change your momentum. And your

0:27:57.600 --> 0:28:00.440
<v Speaker 2>momentum grows very very quickly near the speed of light.

0:28:00.600 --> 0:28:04.000
<v Speaker 2>As you say, it approaches infinity as velocity approaches the

0:28:04.040 --> 0:28:04.600
<v Speaker 2>speed of light.

0:28:04.720 --> 0:28:06.960
<v Speaker 1>So I guess I get more concretely, it would mean

0:28:07.000 --> 0:28:10.520
<v Speaker 1>like my couch, me sitting in my couch, my momentum

0:28:10.520 --> 0:28:12.760
<v Speaker 1>would be my mass times my velocity, which in this

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:14.720
<v Speaker 1>case I guess it's zero, but it would just in

0:28:14.840 --> 0:28:17.639
<v Speaker 1>my mass timeline my velocity. But if I was moving

0:28:17.760 --> 0:28:21.800
<v Speaker 1>at two hundred thousand kilometers per second, then my momentum

0:28:21.800 --> 0:28:24.640
<v Speaker 1>would be not just my mask my velocity, but it'ld

0:28:24.640 --> 0:28:28.480
<v Speaker 1>be mass time my velocity times a really big number,

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:31.240
<v Speaker 1>which is this adjustment factor that gets bigger the closer

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:32.200
<v Speaker 1>you move to the speed of light.

0:28:32.280 --> 0:28:34.840
<v Speaker 2>Exactly. This gamma factor is the thing that Newton missed

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:37.679
<v Speaker 2>in momentum basically, and he missed it because for everything

0:28:37.720 --> 0:28:40.120
<v Speaker 2>he measured and he saw, it was just one, so

0:28:40.160 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 2>it didn't change any of his calculations. Any number multiplied

0:28:43.280 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 2>by one is just itself. So you have like a

0:28:45.000 --> 0:28:48.080
<v Speaker 2>hidden factor in your equations that's always one. You can't

0:28:48.120 --> 0:28:50.480
<v Speaker 2>discover it. You can only discover it when it changes

0:28:50.520 --> 0:28:52.800
<v Speaker 2>from one, and it only changes from one as you

0:28:52.880 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 2>approach the speed of light.

0:28:54.160 --> 0:28:55.960
<v Speaker 1>So I think kind of the message is that the

0:28:56.040 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 1>universe is kind of like, Okay, if you want to

0:28:57.840 --> 0:29:00.240
<v Speaker 1>move something from your couch to your kitchen, that's fine,

0:29:00.280 --> 0:29:01.920
<v Speaker 1>you can do that. It's going to cost you this much.

0:29:02.080 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 1>But if you want to move it from you know,

0:29:03.720 --> 0:29:06.120
<v Speaker 1>your couch to almost as to the speed of light

0:29:06.200 --> 0:29:08.239
<v Speaker 1>or super duper fast, it's going to cost you that

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:12.600
<v Speaker 1>plus an extra like universe tax or something exactly that

0:29:12.640 --> 0:29:14.520
<v Speaker 1>says that, oh, that's going to cost you a lot

0:29:14.600 --> 0:29:17.160
<v Speaker 1>a lot, and somehow the idea is that it that

0:29:17.320 --> 0:29:19.920
<v Speaker 1>kind of lets the universe prevent you from going faster

0:29:20.000 --> 0:29:20.720
<v Speaker 1>than the speed of light.

0:29:20.840 --> 0:29:23.960
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and the universe tax it's basically zero if you're

0:29:24.200 --> 0:29:26.840
<v Speaker 2>not moving very fast. Even if you're moving at like

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:29.800
<v Speaker 2>half the speed of light, this gamma factor, this boost,

0:29:29.800 --> 0:29:33.040
<v Speaker 2>this universe tax is like fifteen percent. So even at

0:29:33.080 --> 0:29:36.040
<v Speaker 2>half the speed of light, it's barely noticeable. As you

0:29:36.040 --> 0:29:37.880
<v Speaker 2>get to like ninety percent of the speed of light,

0:29:37.960 --> 0:29:40.400
<v Speaker 2>it's like two point three. And if you get to

0:29:40.440 --> 0:29:42.560
<v Speaker 2>like ninety nine percent of the speed of light, it's

0:29:42.560 --> 0:29:45.120
<v Speaker 2>like seven ninety nine point nine percent of the speed

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:47.320
<v Speaker 2>of light, it's like twenty two. So it increases very

0:29:47.400 --> 0:29:49.520
<v Speaker 2>very quickly as things get fast.

0:29:49.640 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 1>Well, I didn't know the universe was so progressive.

0:29:53.480 --> 0:29:58.680
<v Speaker 2>Exactly. Momentum, billionaires, the universe is coming for you. Yeah,

0:29:58.720 --> 0:30:01.240
<v Speaker 2>And so really that's fundamentally what's happening. We like to

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:04.000
<v Speaker 2>think about momentum because that's something the universe conserves. That's

0:30:04.000 --> 0:30:07.959
<v Speaker 2>something that's important to the universe, energy and momentum, and

0:30:08.000 --> 0:30:11.200
<v Speaker 2>that's really what's driving this experience that it's harder to

0:30:11.280 --> 0:30:13.520
<v Speaker 2>accelerate as you get towards the speed of light. And

0:30:13.560 --> 0:30:17.640
<v Speaker 2>remember that momentum is directional, right, and so adding velocity

0:30:17.680 --> 0:30:20.960
<v Speaker 2>in the direction you're already going takes actually different amounts

0:30:21.000 --> 0:30:24.160
<v Speaker 2>of momentum than adding velocity like perpendicular to your motion.

0:30:24.440 --> 0:30:25.800
<v Speaker 2>It gets very complicated.

0:30:26.600 --> 0:30:28.800
<v Speaker 1>So I think you're saying that momentum is conserved in

0:30:28.800 --> 0:30:32.080
<v Speaker 1>the universe, but there's there's sort of a premium on

0:30:32.320 --> 0:30:37.880
<v Speaker 1>higher momenti momentumus like the bigger momentum has somehow cost

0:30:37.920 --> 0:30:38.440
<v Speaker 1>you more.

0:30:38.400 --> 0:30:40.560
<v Speaker 2>Exactly, And that raises the question like, well, what do

0:30:40.640 --> 0:30:43.280
<v Speaker 2>we do about mass. We used to have this notion

0:30:43.320 --> 0:30:45.480
<v Speaker 2>and that mass told us how hard it is to

0:30:45.520 --> 0:30:47.760
<v Speaker 2>push something, and in the old sense of momentum, it's

0:30:47.800 --> 0:30:50.880
<v Speaker 2>just mass times velocity. Then it all made sense, and

0:30:50.920 --> 0:30:53.240
<v Speaker 2>then you get the equation F equals MA, AND's a

0:30:53.360 --> 0:30:58.040
<v Speaker 2>very natural linear relationship between acceleration and force. That all

0:30:58.160 --> 0:31:01.520
<v Speaker 2>changes when we change the definition of momentum. You no

0:31:01.560 --> 0:31:03.840
<v Speaker 2>longer have F equals M, and so you have to

0:31:03.840 --> 0:31:05.840
<v Speaker 2>think about, like what do you do with mass.

0:31:06.840 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I think you're saying, like, we have this tax that

0:31:09.400 --> 0:31:11.959
<v Speaker 1>the universe puts on momentum. Now do you take that

0:31:12.080 --> 0:31:15.440
<v Speaker 1>tax and fold it into the definition of mass, or

0:31:15.560 --> 0:31:18.240
<v Speaker 1>is mass still mass, but then you have this extra tax,

0:31:18.240 --> 0:31:19.720
<v Speaker 1>which is not mass exactly.

0:31:19.800 --> 0:31:22.560
<v Speaker 2>And so the modern idea, the one that most physicists use,

0:31:22.640 --> 0:31:25.080
<v Speaker 2>is exactly that to say, let's just leave mass alone.

0:31:25.240 --> 0:31:28.120
<v Speaker 2>Mass is related to your internal stored energy. Let's define

0:31:28.120 --> 0:31:30.800
<v Speaker 2>mass to be something everybody agrees on, no matter what

0:31:30.840 --> 0:31:34.320
<v Speaker 2>their velocity is. And let's just change the definition momentum,

0:31:34.480 --> 0:31:37.280
<v Speaker 2>so mass stays as M whatever it was before, and

0:31:37.320 --> 0:31:39.680
<v Speaker 2>now momentum is M comes v and we conclude the

0:31:39.720 --> 0:31:42.800
<v Speaker 2>gamma factor there in momentum. The other idea, the one

0:31:42.840 --> 0:31:46.280
<v Speaker 2>that leads to this confusion, is this concept of relativistic mass,

0:31:46.280 --> 0:31:50.600
<v Speaker 2>and say, oh, let's redefine mass to be mass times gamma.

0:31:50.680 --> 0:31:53.240
<v Speaker 2>Let's fold that gamma factor into the mass, and that

0:31:53.320 --> 0:31:56.440
<v Speaker 2>lets us keep momentum as mass times velocity because we

0:31:56.600 --> 0:31:58.880
<v Speaker 2>like that equation. And so there's sort of a choice

0:31:58.880 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 2>to be made there, like do you redefine momentum or

0:32:01.680 --> 0:32:02.920
<v Speaker 2>do you redefine mass?

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:04.640
<v Speaker 1>Well, I see, it kind of depends on whether you

0:32:04.720 --> 0:32:07.520
<v Speaker 1>define mass as how hard you are to push when

0:32:07.560 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 1>you're just sitting on your couch, or how hard you

0:32:11.200 --> 0:32:13.560
<v Speaker 1>are to push at any point, or no matter how

0:32:13.560 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 1>fast you're moving.

0:32:14.400 --> 0:32:16.880
<v Speaker 2>It's definitely a choice, right, It's a definition, and you

0:32:16.920 --> 0:32:19.160
<v Speaker 2>can make one choice or the other, and the equations

0:32:19.200 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 2>all work. I think it's more coherent. It makes more

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 2>sense if you call mass as you say how hard

0:32:24.240 --> 0:32:26.200
<v Speaker 2>it is to push you when you're sitting on your couch.

0:32:26.280 --> 0:32:28.480
<v Speaker 2>It's tempting to say, well, it makes more sense to

0:32:28.560 --> 0:32:30.480
<v Speaker 2>use masses how hard it is to push when you're

0:32:30.480 --> 0:32:32.960
<v Speaker 2>moving fast as well. But as we can dig into

0:32:33.040 --> 0:32:35.800
<v Speaker 2>in a moment that doesn't actually hang together. You can't

0:32:35.800 --> 0:32:38.160
<v Speaker 2>have just a single number that tells you how hard

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:40.880
<v Speaker 2>it is to speed up, because that actually depends a

0:32:40.920 --> 0:32:43.840
<v Speaker 2>little bit on the direction of your speed up. So

0:32:44.000 --> 0:32:46.960
<v Speaker 2>relativistic mass is a little bit complicated and problematic. It

0:32:46.960 --> 0:32:49.040
<v Speaker 2>doesn't really do that job. Doesn't let you use F

0:32:49.080 --> 0:32:52.600
<v Speaker 2>equals ma again by redefining m I see.

0:32:52.640 --> 0:32:55.160
<v Speaker 1>So I think maybe for the people who had heard

0:32:55.200 --> 0:32:57.160
<v Speaker 1>that the faster you go, or the closer you get

0:32:57.160 --> 0:32:58.960
<v Speaker 1>to the speed of light, the more mass if you get,

0:32:59.120 --> 0:33:01.880
<v Speaker 1>what they probably heard at that time was that you

0:33:01.880 --> 0:33:04.120
<v Speaker 1>do get harder to push as you get closer to

0:33:04.120 --> 0:33:05.840
<v Speaker 1>the speed of light. But that doesn't mean that your

0:33:05.880 --> 0:33:09.920
<v Speaker 1>mass went up, but that there's an adjustment to your momentum,

0:33:10.120 --> 0:33:13.920
<v Speaker 1>or there's a premium to how much momentum cause, which

0:33:14.160 --> 0:33:16.040
<v Speaker 1>makes it harder for you to push you, but it

0:33:16.080 --> 0:33:18.520
<v Speaker 1>doesn't change how hard you are to get off the couch.

0:33:18.640 --> 0:33:21.200
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, and physics has sort of changed its mind about this.

0:33:21.600 --> 0:33:25.200
<v Speaker 2>Even Einstein for a while used this concept of relativistic mass,

0:33:25.200 --> 0:33:28.000
<v Speaker 2>and it was taught in textbooks. So people who were told, like,

0:33:28.400 --> 0:33:30.480
<v Speaker 2>your mass increases as you approached the speed of light,

0:33:30.720 --> 0:33:33.080
<v Speaker 2>that's not wrong. It just depends on what you mean

0:33:33.160 --> 0:33:36.000
<v Speaker 2>by mass. So it really is our choice what do

0:33:36.000 --> 0:33:37.840
<v Speaker 2>we mean by this word mass. You used to have

0:33:37.880 --> 0:33:40.400
<v Speaker 2>a very crisp and clear definition that everybody agreed about

0:33:40.640 --> 0:33:43.360
<v Speaker 2>at low speeds. At high speeds, it becomes a little

0:33:43.400 --> 0:33:46.440
<v Speaker 2>bit trickier, and you can use the word relativistic mass.

0:33:46.480 --> 0:33:48.200
<v Speaker 2>It's not like it's wrong. It's just a choice for

0:33:48.240 --> 0:33:51.080
<v Speaker 2>how to organize the ideas. And now we think it

0:33:51.120 --> 0:33:54.120
<v Speaker 2>makes more sense to just describe mass as how hard

0:33:54.120 --> 0:33:56.000
<v Speaker 2>it is to push you when you're sitting on your couch,

0:33:56.280 --> 0:33:58.920
<v Speaker 2>and to leave momentum to absorb all the messiness.

0:33:59.040 --> 0:34:01.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess you're saying, like mask can just be how

0:34:01.800 --> 0:34:03.400
<v Speaker 1>hard it is to push you off your couch, but

0:34:03.640 --> 0:34:06.880
<v Speaker 1>we can introduce maybe a constantly called relativistic mass, where

0:34:06.880 --> 0:34:09.960
<v Speaker 1>people did introduce a concept called relativistic mass, which is

0:34:10.000 --> 0:34:13.120
<v Speaker 1>how hard you are to push at all speeds, and

0:34:13.160 --> 0:34:14.520
<v Speaker 1>that changes the faster you go.

0:34:14.760 --> 0:34:16.560
<v Speaker 2>That does change the faster you go, though I would

0:34:16.560 --> 0:34:18.719
<v Speaker 2>say the two choices are not equal. I would say

0:34:18.760 --> 0:34:21.439
<v Speaker 2>there's some problems with relativistic mass. I mean, problem number

0:34:21.480 --> 0:34:24.160
<v Speaker 2>one is that it's just a number, whereas momentum is

0:34:24.200 --> 0:34:27.120
<v Speaker 2>three numbers. It's a direction. And so if you're going

0:34:27.200 --> 0:34:29.719
<v Speaker 2>to talk about how hard it is to change your momentum,

0:34:29.800 --> 0:34:31.960
<v Speaker 2>then if you have a high speed in one direction,

0:34:32.200 --> 0:34:35.680
<v Speaker 2>you basically have a different relativistic mass in each direction,

0:34:36.239 --> 0:34:38.799
<v Speaker 2>because it's harder to push you in the direction you're

0:34:38.840 --> 0:34:41.800
<v Speaker 2>already going fast than it is to push you perpendicular

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:44.920
<v Speaker 2>to that direction. So then you need like a transverse

0:34:45.040 --> 0:34:49.320
<v Speaker 2>relativistic mass and the longitudinal relativistic mass. It gets messy

0:34:49.440 --> 0:34:50.240
<v Speaker 2>very very quickly.

0:34:50.400 --> 0:34:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Well, I think what you're saying is that it's not

0:34:52.719 --> 0:34:55.560
<v Speaker 1>that it gets message is that the word relativistic mass

0:34:56.080 --> 0:34:58.839
<v Speaker 1>is a vector, like you have to define which way

0:34:59.000 --> 0:35:01.680
<v Speaker 1>you're pointing your li relativistic mass, just like you have

0:35:01.760 --> 0:35:03.719
<v Speaker 1>to define which way you're pointing your momentum.

0:35:03.719 --> 0:35:06.000
<v Speaker 2>Well, we already have that concept of momentum, right, so

0:35:06.000 --> 0:35:09.000
<v Speaker 2>we don't really need a vector of relativistic mass. And

0:35:09.280 --> 0:35:12.120
<v Speaker 2>the formula for relativistic mass, it turns out, is actually

0:35:12.200 --> 0:35:15.759
<v Speaker 2>just energy divided by the speed of light. So relativistic

0:35:15.800 --> 0:35:18.319
<v Speaker 2>mass doesn't actually give you anything new that you don't

0:35:18.320 --> 0:35:23.000
<v Speaker 2>already have for momentum and energy, so sort of unnecessary.

0:35:23.000 --> 0:35:26.400
<v Speaker 2>Whereas invariant mass, your rest mass is actually something independent

0:35:26.480 --> 0:35:29.239
<v Speaker 2>and interesting. It tells you, like what is the thing.

0:35:29.840 --> 0:35:33.600
<v Speaker 2>You know, photons and electrons and protons all have different

0:35:34.000 --> 0:35:36.040
<v Speaker 2>rest masses. That tells you a little bit about like

0:35:36.040 --> 0:35:39.120
<v Speaker 2>what the thing is, what it has to it, which

0:35:39.160 --> 0:35:41.680
<v Speaker 2>I think is more closely connected to like our intuitive

0:35:41.760 --> 0:35:44.319
<v Speaker 2>idea for what mass is that it tells you something

0:35:44.360 --> 0:35:45.719
<v Speaker 2>about like what you're made of.

0:35:46.480 --> 0:35:48.600
<v Speaker 1>And I guess for people who maybe missed it or

0:35:48.640 --> 0:35:53.160
<v Speaker 1>are not super familiar with this idea of directionality, I

0:35:53.160 --> 0:35:54.840
<v Speaker 1>think what you're saying is that, like, if I'm going

0:35:54.880 --> 0:35:58.279
<v Speaker 1>really fast from here to Andromeda, for example, in one

0:35:58.320 --> 0:36:00.759
<v Speaker 1>particular direction, and I'm going at the speed of light,

0:36:00.960 --> 0:36:04.040
<v Speaker 1>then my momentum in the direction from here to Andromeda

0:36:04.160 --> 0:36:06.239
<v Speaker 1>is really high because I'm going really fast, and so

0:36:06.280 --> 0:36:09.680
<v Speaker 1>it's really hard to accelerate be more in the direction

0:36:09.760 --> 0:36:12.000
<v Speaker 1>of Andromeda. But maybe if you're going along with me

0:36:12.080 --> 0:36:13.919
<v Speaker 1>and you try to push me in a direction that's

0:36:14.120 --> 0:36:17.160
<v Speaker 1>perpendicular to the side of the direction from here to Andromeda,

0:36:17.320 --> 0:36:20.960
<v Speaker 1>then you're not going to notice me being super massive

0:36:21.040 --> 0:36:23.799
<v Speaker 1>or having this huge relativistic mass. Is just going to

0:36:23.920 --> 0:36:26.080
<v Speaker 1>feel to you like I'm sitting on the couch, Like

0:36:26.120 --> 0:36:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm sitting on the couch in one direction, but I'm

0:36:27.719 --> 0:36:29.080
<v Speaker 1>going really fast in another direction.

0:36:29.280 --> 0:36:32.600
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, that's approximately true, because your motion towards and Drameda

0:36:32.760 --> 0:36:35.839
<v Speaker 2>does change your overall velocity, and the limit is on

0:36:35.880 --> 0:36:39.320
<v Speaker 2>the total velocity in any direction, not just in one direction.

0:36:39.440 --> 0:36:41.719
<v Speaker 2>But for the most part that's true. You know, what

0:36:41.760 --> 0:36:43.880
<v Speaker 2>happens at those very high speeds is like, if you

0:36:43.960 --> 0:36:46.840
<v Speaker 2>push in one direction, you don't get accelerated in the

0:36:46.880 --> 0:36:49.840
<v Speaker 2>direction you were pushing, because the pushing has a different

0:36:49.880 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 2>impact based on your momentum, right, and so in some

0:36:52.680 --> 0:36:54.960
<v Speaker 2>directions you already have a lot of momentum, and other

0:36:55.000 --> 0:36:57.080
<v Speaker 2>directions you don't have as much momentum, and so the

0:36:57.080 --> 0:37:00.680
<v Speaker 2>pushing changes your momentum differently in those different directions. So

0:37:00.840 --> 0:37:04.880
<v Speaker 2>force and acceleration no longer line up. So F doesn't

0:37:04.920 --> 0:37:08.279
<v Speaker 2>equal ME at very high velocities. Instead, you have to

0:37:08.360 --> 0:37:11.920
<v Speaker 2>use F equals change in momentum. That's the real formula.

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:14.399
<v Speaker 1>I feel like you're kind of saying, like, just forget

0:37:14.440 --> 0:37:16.600
<v Speaker 1>about mass, like you've seen it on the couch and

0:37:16.600 --> 0:37:19.120
<v Speaker 1>nobody cares about that. Really, what we care about is

0:37:19.160 --> 0:37:21.720
<v Speaker 1>all hard you arc to push in any particular direction.

0:37:21.800 --> 0:37:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Is that kind of what you're saying, right, Like you're saying,

0:37:24.400 --> 0:37:27.520
<v Speaker 1>like res mass, that's just the thing. It doesn't really change,

0:37:27.560 --> 0:37:29.960
<v Speaker 1>nobody cares. What's really happening at these high speeds is

0:37:30.000 --> 0:37:32.000
<v Speaker 1>that weird things are happening with your momentum.

0:37:32.120 --> 0:37:34.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I'm saying, let's talk about what's really important, and

0:37:34.400 --> 0:37:37.960
<v Speaker 2>it's high speeds. It's momentum that's important. Mass is still important.

0:37:38.000 --> 0:37:40.440
<v Speaker 2>It's very interesting and very important, and it tells you,

0:37:40.480 --> 0:37:43.040
<v Speaker 2>like what the thing is. In particle physics, we talk

0:37:43.080 --> 0:37:45.560
<v Speaker 2>about res mass all the time, Like we measure a

0:37:45.560 --> 0:37:47.520
<v Speaker 2>particle where like, oh, what was its mass? Okay, it

0:37:47.560 --> 0:37:49.560
<v Speaker 2>must be an electron or look we found a new

0:37:49.600 --> 0:37:52.319
<v Speaker 2>particle at one hundred and twenty five GeV mass, that's

0:37:52.320 --> 0:37:54.440
<v Speaker 2>got to be something new. We've never seen a particle

0:37:54.520 --> 0:37:58.320
<v Speaker 2>with that mass before. So mass is still very very important,

0:37:58.320 --> 0:38:00.520
<v Speaker 2>but it tells you something different. It's tells you something

0:38:00.560 --> 0:38:03.440
<v Speaker 2>about the character and the nature, the existence, the identity

0:38:03.560 --> 0:38:05.480
<v Speaker 2>of the particle. And what we're talking about here is

0:38:05.480 --> 0:38:07.920
<v Speaker 2>like motion near the speed of light, that's all about momentum.

0:38:08.320 --> 0:38:10.880
<v Speaker 2>And so really, let's talk about momentum when we're talking

0:38:10.880 --> 0:38:13.560
<v Speaker 2>about very high speed motion, and let's talk about mass

0:38:13.640 --> 0:38:15.600
<v Speaker 2>when we're talking about you know, what the thing is

0:38:15.719 --> 0:38:18.480
<v Speaker 2>made out of. I think those are two separate concepts,

0:38:18.480 --> 0:38:21.440
<v Speaker 2>and it's best to disentangle them. Is the point. Not

0:38:21.520 --> 0:38:23.600
<v Speaker 2>that nobody cares about rest mass, it's just it doesn't

0:38:23.600 --> 0:38:26.080
<v Speaker 2>help us understand motion near the speed of light as much.

0:38:26.320 --> 0:38:28.520
<v Speaker 1>No, yeah, I know what you mean. My spouse definitely

0:38:28.560 --> 0:38:32.480
<v Speaker 1>cares if I say to my count all day. But

0:38:32.520 --> 0:38:35.359
<v Speaker 1>I think what you're saying, maybe for listeners, I think

0:38:35.400 --> 0:38:37.560
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying is that if you've heard the phrase

0:38:37.600 --> 0:38:39.680
<v Speaker 1>like your mask gets bigger as you go closer to

0:38:39.680 --> 0:38:42.040
<v Speaker 1>the speed of light, then really what you should hear

0:38:42.080 --> 0:38:43.879
<v Speaker 1>in your head or how you should correct a person

0:38:44.000 --> 0:38:47.200
<v Speaker 1>saying it is that your relativistic mass gets bigger as

0:38:47.200 --> 0:38:49.600
<v Speaker 1>you get closer to the speed of light. And also

0:38:49.760 --> 0:38:54.359
<v Speaker 1>common asterisk. Nobody or modern physicists don't really talk about

0:38:54.400 --> 0:38:57.759
<v Speaker 1>relativistic mass or use that as a concept exactly.

0:38:57.960 --> 0:39:00.960
<v Speaker 2>A relativistic mass is really just another way to say energy.

0:39:01.239 --> 0:39:04.560
<v Speaker 2>Like the relationship in the formula is between relativistic mass

0:39:04.560 --> 0:39:06.840
<v Speaker 2>and energy that have exactly the same value. One is

0:39:06.880 --> 0:39:09.399
<v Speaker 2>just multiplied by the speed of light squared, so they

0:39:09.480 --> 0:39:12.880
<v Speaker 2>change in exactly the same way. So relativistic mass is

0:39:12.920 --> 0:39:14.919
<v Speaker 2>just another way to say, like how much energy does

0:39:14.920 --> 0:39:17.279
<v Speaker 2>something have. It's a way to try to combine the

0:39:17.320 --> 0:39:20.480
<v Speaker 2>rest mass and the kinetic energy together into one like

0:39:20.600 --> 0:39:24.359
<v Speaker 2>overall coherent energy, and then to say, oh, well that's

0:39:24.360 --> 0:39:26.200
<v Speaker 2>all A new kind of mass would just say that

0:39:26.400 --> 0:39:28.480
<v Speaker 2>energy of the particle is kind of like its mass

0:39:28.520 --> 0:39:30.759
<v Speaker 2>of motion. I'm just here to say, like, okay, let's

0:39:30.760 --> 0:39:32.960
<v Speaker 2>just leave mass to be mass of a rest particle

0:39:33.320 --> 0:39:35.919
<v Speaker 2>and to talk about motion. Will leave that as kinetic energy.

0:39:35.960 --> 0:39:38.080
<v Speaker 2>But we have to invent a concept called mass of motion.

0:39:38.200 --> 0:39:40.640
<v Speaker 2>We already have energy of motion. We already have this

0:39:40.760 --> 0:39:44.040
<v Speaker 2>concept described In other words, relativistic mass doesn't really add

0:39:44.040 --> 0:39:46.520
<v Speaker 2>anything if you already have momentum and you have energy.

0:39:46.600 --> 0:39:48.600
<v Speaker 2>So let's leave mass to do its job and tell

0:39:48.640 --> 0:39:50.640
<v Speaker 2>us about like the nature of the object when it's

0:39:50.640 --> 0:39:51.480
<v Speaker 2>sitting on its couch.

0:39:51.640 --> 0:39:53.680
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, I think we've made that kind of clear,

0:39:53.800 --> 0:39:56.720
<v Speaker 1>and so let's get a little bit deeper into why

0:39:56.760 --> 0:39:59.920
<v Speaker 1>this term is not quite applicable or useful or help

0:40:00.360 --> 0:40:03.480
<v Speaker 1>or even accurate, and what it means about this speed

0:40:03.520 --> 0:40:06.080
<v Speaker 1>limit of the universe and why it exists. But first

0:40:06.160 --> 0:40:21.600
<v Speaker 1>let's take another quick break. All right, we're talking about

0:40:21.960 --> 0:40:25.480
<v Speaker 1>sitting on our couches. Who doesn't enjoy that? And when

0:40:25.520 --> 0:40:28.200
<v Speaker 1>we're sitting in our couch going at zero velocity relative

0:40:28.239 --> 0:40:30.279
<v Speaker 1>to other people, we have a certain amount of mass

0:40:30.280 --> 0:40:33.920
<v Speaker 1>and a certain resistance to movement, which Daniel, I think

0:40:33.960 --> 0:40:36.160
<v Speaker 1>you're saying, that's what we should call mass, not how

0:40:36.200 --> 0:40:37.920
<v Speaker 1>hard you are to push when you're going really.

0:40:37.719 --> 0:40:40.320
<v Speaker 2>Fast, exactly. I think the question you should ask yourself

0:40:40.360 --> 0:40:42.000
<v Speaker 2>is like what are you trying to talk about when

0:40:42.000 --> 0:40:44.239
<v Speaker 2>you talk about mass? And for me, I want to

0:40:44.280 --> 0:40:46.239
<v Speaker 2>talk about, like what is the thing made out of?

0:40:46.480 --> 0:40:48.520
<v Speaker 2>What does it have stored inside of it? And that

0:40:48.600 --> 0:40:51.080
<v Speaker 2>really doesn't change when you go to high velocity. A

0:40:51.160 --> 0:40:53.799
<v Speaker 2>proton moving and high speed doesn't have more stuff to

0:40:53.840 --> 0:40:56.600
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't have more gluons inside of it contributing to

0:40:56.640 --> 0:40:59.440
<v Speaker 2>its mass. It's the same proton. It's just moving faster.

0:40:59.520 --> 0:41:02.799
<v Speaker 2>It has energy of motion, which definitely will affect how

0:41:02.840 --> 0:41:04.799
<v Speaker 2>you accelerate it and how you push it and how

0:41:04.800 --> 0:41:07.920
<v Speaker 2>it responds to those pushes, but doesn't change what it

0:41:08.080 --> 0:41:10.520
<v Speaker 2>is fundamentally. And to me, mass is answering that question

0:41:10.600 --> 0:41:13.200
<v Speaker 2>of like, what is in this thing now?

0:41:13.280 --> 0:41:16.280
<v Speaker 1>I guess the question would be does your gravitational mass

0:41:16.320 --> 0:41:18.440
<v Speaker 1>also change as you go faster or close to the

0:41:18.480 --> 0:41:19.960
<v Speaker 1>speed of light or do you still have the same

0:41:20.000 --> 0:41:22.920
<v Speaker 1>gravity or is that not even relevant in relativity.

0:41:23.000 --> 0:41:26.000
<v Speaker 2>I think that's another reason not to use relativistic mass.

0:41:26.080 --> 0:41:28.919
<v Speaker 2>If you think about relativistic mass of things getting more

0:41:29.000 --> 0:41:31.040
<v Speaker 2>massive as their approach to speed of light and this

0:41:31.239 --> 0:41:34.480
<v Speaker 2>like mass of motion, then you're tempted to think that

0:41:34.560 --> 0:41:37.719
<v Speaker 2>things should have more gravity as they're moving faster. And

0:41:37.760 --> 0:41:39.520
<v Speaker 2>then you might go down the rabbit hole and be like, well,

0:41:39.560 --> 0:41:41.640
<v Speaker 2>if I take a proton and give it a lot

0:41:41.680 --> 0:41:44.120
<v Speaker 2>of speed, why doesn't it turn into a black hole.

0:41:44.160 --> 0:41:46.560
<v Speaker 2>Or if I throw a baseball fast enough, why doesn't

0:41:46.560 --> 0:41:49.319
<v Speaker 2>it collapse into a black hole? If it's gaining more

0:41:49.440 --> 0:41:53.400
<v Speaker 2>relativistic mass, shouldn't that give it also more gravitational mass

0:41:53.400 --> 0:41:56.320
<v Speaker 2>and collapse? Right. We talked about this once on a podcast.

0:41:56.320 --> 0:41:59.200
<v Speaker 2>It's a really interesting and fascinating question because, on one hand,

0:41:59.200 --> 0:42:01.600
<v Speaker 2>the curvature of base time, the thing that could actually

0:42:01.640 --> 0:42:04.720
<v Speaker 2>create a black hole for you, doesn't just depend on mass.

0:42:04.719 --> 0:42:06.680
<v Speaker 2>It also does depend on energy.

0:42:06.800 --> 0:42:07.000
<v Speaker 7>Right.

0:42:07.120 --> 0:42:10.400
<v Speaker 2>General relativity tells us that space bends in response to

0:42:10.480 --> 0:42:13.640
<v Speaker 2>mass and energy, and so you might think, like, oh,

0:42:13.680 --> 0:42:16.600
<v Speaker 2>it doesn't matter if you choose relativistic mass or inertial mass.

0:42:16.960 --> 0:42:19.680
<v Speaker 2>It just depends on the mass and the energy altogether.

0:42:19.920 --> 0:42:22.160
<v Speaker 2>And that's true. But general relativity is a bit more

0:42:22.160 --> 0:42:24.239
<v Speaker 2>complicated than that. You don't just like add up all

0:42:24.239 --> 0:42:26.840
<v Speaker 2>the mass and energy in space and say that tells

0:42:26.840 --> 0:42:29.799
<v Speaker 2>you the curvature. It's a stress energy tensor. There's all

0:42:29.880 --> 0:42:33.239
<v Speaker 2>these components and some ad and some subtract. It's very complicated,

0:42:33.280 --> 0:42:36.040
<v Speaker 2>and the bottom line is that kinetic energy does not

0:42:36.200 --> 0:42:39.480
<v Speaker 2>contribute to the curvature of space. We know this because

0:42:39.520 --> 0:42:42.759
<v Speaker 2>we know that black holes exist for every observer It's

0:42:42.800 --> 0:42:45.279
<v Speaker 2>not like if I'm holding a baseball, I don't see

0:42:45.280 --> 0:42:47.200
<v Speaker 2>a black hole and somebody is zipping by at high

0:42:47.239 --> 0:42:49.960
<v Speaker 2>speed sees it as a black hole. That's not possible.

0:42:50.200 --> 0:42:52.560
<v Speaker 2>Something's a black hole. It's a black hole for everybody,

0:42:53.000 --> 0:42:56.160
<v Speaker 2>And so only the rest mass can contribute to making

0:42:56.239 --> 0:42:58.799
<v Speaker 2>something a black hole, which is a long way of

0:42:58.840 --> 0:43:01.960
<v Speaker 2>saying relativistic mass confuses you because it makes you think

0:43:02.120 --> 0:43:04.200
<v Speaker 2>that you should be adding mass to this object, which

0:43:04.280 --> 0:43:06.000
<v Speaker 2>might lead it to a collapse to a black hole.

0:43:06.120 --> 0:43:09.200
<v Speaker 2>But that definitely doesn't happen, I see.

0:43:09.440 --> 0:43:12.279
<v Speaker 1>So then we just stick to mass as hell hard

0:43:12.280 --> 0:43:13.799
<v Speaker 1>it is to move me on my couch. And when

0:43:13.800 --> 0:43:15.719
<v Speaker 1>we talk about going close to the speed of light,

0:43:15.760 --> 0:43:19.120
<v Speaker 1>then we just just say that momentum gets harder to

0:43:19.280 --> 0:43:21.760
<v Speaker 1>change as you go faster and faster exactly.

0:43:22.000 --> 0:43:24.600
<v Speaker 2>And those calculations in general relativity of like folding in

0:43:24.680 --> 0:43:27.560
<v Speaker 2>kinetic energy, those are a beast And I don't even

0:43:27.560 --> 0:43:30.360
<v Speaker 2>think people have actually been able to do those calculations.

0:43:30.719 --> 0:43:32.600
<v Speaker 2>When they have to do them, they use the trick

0:43:32.640 --> 0:43:34.359
<v Speaker 2>and say, oh, well, if there's a black hole in

0:43:34.400 --> 0:43:36.840
<v Speaker 2>any frame, there's a black hole in every frame, so

0:43:36.920 --> 0:43:39.160
<v Speaker 2>let's do this calculation and the simplest for him, where

0:43:39.160 --> 0:43:41.319
<v Speaker 2>the thing is at rest, where it just depends on

0:43:41.360 --> 0:43:44.080
<v Speaker 2>its mass. I think nobody knows how to do that calculation.

0:43:44.440 --> 0:43:46.680
<v Speaker 2>It's so complicated, but it's just another way of saying

0:43:46.719 --> 0:43:48.960
<v Speaker 2>when we think about gravity also not just like the

0:43:48.960 --> 0:43:52.080
<v Speaker 2>inertial nature of the thing, but also the gravitational nature

0:43:52.080 --> 0:43:54.239
<v Speaker 2>of the thing, how much it bends space time, it

0:43:54.280 --> 0:43:56.520
<v Speaker 2>makes the most sense to think about the rest mass.

0:43:56.600 --> 0:43:59.400
<v Speaker 1>Well, I guess I'll give you that. Maybe it's easier

0:43:59.440 --> 0:44:01.960
<v Speaker 1>to think about it if you don't call something relativistic mass.

0:44:01.960 --> 0:44:04.080
<v Speaker 1>But then I guess my question would be why does

0:44:04.160 --> 0:44:07.640
<v Speaker 1>momentum get harder to change as the faster you go? Yeah,

0:44:07.719 --> 0:44:10.040
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't help you with that quobate question, right, that's

0:44:10.080 --> 0:44:12.919
<v Speaker 1>a very fundamental question about the universe. You're just calling

0:44:12.960 --> 0:44:14.640
<v Speaker 1>things differently. It's still the same question.

0:44:14.840 --> 0:44:17.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, it's still the same question. Why does the universe

0:44:17.400 --> 0:44:21.520
<v Speaker 2>conserve this quantity mass times velocity times gamma. The fascinating

0:44:21.520 --> 0:44:23.680
<v Speaker 2>thing is that that's what it conserves. It doesn't conserve

0:44:23.719 --> 0:44:28.320
<v Speaker 2>mass times velocity. Newtonian momentum is not conserved in the universe.

0:44:28.560 --> 0:44:32.279
<v Speaker 2>It's only this Einsteinian momentum. Mass times velocity times this

0:44:32.400 --> 0:44:36.000
<v Speaker 2>gamma factor. That's the thing that's actually conserved in the universe.

0:44:36.400 --> 0:44:37.840
<v Speaker 2>And you can see this if you take a class

0:44:37.840 --> 0:44:40.879
<v Speaker 2>in special relativity and you like think about collisions at

0:44:40.960 --> 0:44:43.000
<v Speaker 2>very very high energies and you try to use like

0:44:43.200 --> 0:44:46.520
<v Speaker 2>normal Galilean velocity edition formulas, and you see the momentum

0:44:46.560 --> 0:44:50.120
<v Speaker 2>is no longer conserved. So the universe conserves this quantity

0:44:50.200 --> 0:44:53.920
<v Speaker 2>mass times velocity times gamma. Why, well, that actually comes

0:44:53.960 --> 0:44:57.160
<v Speaker 2>out of the invariance of space. Right, space is the

0:44:57.200 --> 0:44:59.880
<v Speaker 2>same everywhere in the universe. That tells you that this

0:45:00.080 --> 0:45:04.120
<v Speaker 2>quantity mass times velocity times gamma is the thing that's conserved.

0:45:04.239 --> 0:45:06.800
<v Speaker 2>Why is that. It's because of the invariance of space.

0:45:06.840 --> 0:45:09.719
<v Speaker 2>Space seems to be the same everywhere, and that's why

0:45:09.760 --> 0:45:12.440
<v Speaker 2>momentum is conserved. That's a deep principle in physics.

0:45:12.600 --> 0:45:16.239
<v Speaker 1>Noether's theorem, Well, I think you're creating a causality there

0:45:16.600 --> 0:45:18.839
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, right, Like you don't know that one

0:45:18.880 --> 0:45:20.959
<v Speaker 1>causes the other. It's just that they just both happen

0:45:21.000 --> 0:45:21.439
<v Speaker 1>to be true.

0:45:21.480 --> 0:45:23.719
<v Speaker 2>Well, Notther's theorem tells us that there is a causality.

0:45:23.760 --> 0:45:26.120
<v Speaker 2>It says that for every symmetry in the universe, there

0:45:26.200 --> 0:45:28.960
<v Speaker 2>is a conserved quantity, and so for example, the fact

0:45:29.000 --> 0:45:32.719
<v Speaker 2>that there's no preferred direction in space leads to conservation

0:45:32.800 --> 0:45:34.440
<v Speaker 2>of angular momentum.

0:45:34.040 --> 0:45:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Or maybe the conservation of angular momentum is what space

0:45:39.120 --> 0:45:43.359
<v Speaker 1>it's invariant. Philosophically, I feel like you're making a conclusion there.

0:45:43.400 --> 0:45:45.480
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I think that conclusion does come from Northern's theorem.

0:45:45.520 --> 0:45:47.040
<v Speaker 2>I understand the point you're making. But this is not

0:45:47.080 --> 0:45:49.640
<v Speaker 2>like an equal sign, right, It's not like a equals B,

0:45:49.800 --> 0:45:52.520
<v Speaker 2>and therefore you can't infer causality. If you follow the

0:45:52.520 --> 0:45:55.400
<v Speaker 2>derivation of Notther's theorem, then it definitely goes in one direction.

0:45:55.560 --> 0:45:59.120
<v Speaker 2>The conservation wills definitely flow from symmetries in the equations.

0:45:59.280 --> 0:46:01.440
<v Speaker 2>If you have a symmet in the laws of physics,

0:46:01.719 --> 0:46:05.320
<v Speaker 2>then it gives you these conservation laws. And it's everywhere,

0:46:05.360 --> 0:46:08.600
<v Speaker 2>like even in quantum mechanics, like local gauge. Symmetry of

0:46:08.680 --> 0:46:12.120
<v Speaker 2>quantum electrodynamics is the reason we have charge conservation in

0:46:12.160 --> 0:46:15.080
<v Speaker 2>the universe. So these things are pretty deep. And what

0:46:15.080 --> 0:46:16.839
<v Speaker 2>it tells us in this case is that it's mass

0:46:16.880 --> 0:46:20.120
<v Speaker 2>times velocity times this gamma factor. That's the thing the

0:46:20.280 --> 0:46:22.640
<v Speaker 2>universe cares about. And even if you don't like others

0:46:22.680 --> 0:46:25.240
<v Speaker 2>theorem and you don't believe in it or whatever, Observationally,

0:46:25.480 --> 0:46:27.880
<v Speaker 2>that's what we've measured Empirically. We're like, look, this is

0:46:27.920 --> 0:46:30.520
<v Speaker 2>the thing the universe seems to care about. This quantity,

0:46:30.760 --> 0:46:33.640
<v Speaker 2>not mass times velocity. So in some sense that's the

0:46:33.640 --> 0:46:36.239
<v Speaker 2>fundamental thing. That's the thing that like the universe is

0:46:36.280 --> 0:46:37.560
<v Speaker 2>telling us it cares about.

0:46:37.719 --> 0:46:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Right, That's what I mean. It's like, that's the thing

0:46:39.600 --> 0:46:42.520
<v Speaker 1>that we know is true. And whether it's caused by

0:46:42.680 --> 0:46:46.000
<v Speaker 1>symmetry or it approves the theory, or whether it enables

0:46:46.040 --> 0:46:49.200
<v Speaker 1>a symmetry that's sort of a philosophical question a little.

0:46:49.040 --> 0:46:51.680
<v Speaker 2>Bit, yeah, a little bit, I mean, or theoretical. Experimentally,

0:46:51.680 --> 0:46:53.239
<v Speaker 2>you're right, this is the thing we measure, and we

0:46:53.320 --> 0:46:55.759
<v Speaker 2>notice the universe cares about absolutely.

0:46:56.080 --> 0:46:58.680
<v Speaker 1>I guess then the question is what does that say

0:46:58.680 --> 0:47:02.480
<v Speaker 1>about the universe that it cares about something doesn't just

0:47:02.520 --> 0:47:03.440
<v Speaker 1>sit in the couch all day.

0:47:03.480 --> 0:47:04.880
<v Speaker 2>I think it tells us a little bit about the

0:47:04.960 --> 0:47:07.719
<v Speaker 2>history of human thoughts. You know, we've been like grappling

0:47:08.080 --> 0:47:10.960
<v Speaker 2>with how to deal with these new discoveries that we've

0:47:10.960 --> 0:47:13.160
<v Speaker 2>made and how to talk about them. One of my

0:47:13.160 --> 0:47:15.800
<v Speaker 2>favorite Cootes from Einstein relates to this. He says, quote,

0:47:15.840 --> 0:47:19.360
<v Speaker 2>the only justification for our concepts and systems of concepts

0:47:19.640 --> 0:47:23.280
<v Speaker 2>is that they serve to represent the complex of our experiences.

0:47:23.640 --> 0:47:26.440
<v Speaker 2>Beyond that, they have no legitimacy, by which he means like,

0:47:26.520 --> 0:47:29.160
<v Speaker 2>you know, what is mass, what is momentum, what is force?

0:47:29.440 --> 0:47:32.200
<v Speaker 2>They only make sense if they're talking about things we experience.

0:47:32.239 --> 0:47:34.640
<v Speaker 2>We put these labels on things we see and experience

0:47:34.680 --> 0:47:36.920
<v Speaker 2>in the universe, and we try to give them meaning.

0:47:37.400 --> 0:47:40.480
<v Speaker 2>And there's actually Einstein originally who created this concept of

0:47:40.600 --> 0:47:43.440
<v Speaker 2>relativistic mass when he was playing around with these equations

0:47:43.520 --> 0:47:45.560
<v Speaker 2>and he was like, hmm, maybe it's useful to have

0:47:45.640 --> 0:47:48.959
<v Speaker 2>this concept of mass that depends on your velocity. Later

0:47:49.000 --> 0:47:51.840
<v Speaker 2>on he abandoned it. He realized, n that's kind of messy.

0:47:52.280 --> 0:47:54.319
<v Speaker 2>And then later he said, it is not good to

0:47:54.440 --> 0:47:57.640
<v Speaker 2>introduce the concept of relativistic mass of a moving body

0:47:57.680 --> 0:48:01.279
<v Speaker 2>for which no clear definition can be He realized it

0:48:01.320 --> 0:48:03.480
<v Speaker 2>was a bit messy. But you know, even geniuses like

0:48:03.480 --> 0:48:07.200
<v Speaker 2>Einstein can't immediately disentangle these discoveries when he makes them.

0:48:07.280 --> 0:48:09.600
<v Speaker 2>It takes a few years, a few decades of thinking

0:48:09.600 --> 0:48:12.000
<v Speaker 2>about how this really lines up with our experience in

0:48:12.040 --> 0:48:14.480
<v Speaker 2>the universe, what's the most sensible way to organize it?

0:48:14.760 --> 0:48:17.120
<v Speaker 2>And the end is just us talking about how humans

0:48:17.160 --> 0:48:19.520
<v Speaker 2>think about these things. The math is very, very clear,

0:48:19.800 --> 0:48:22.239
<v Speaker 2>there's no ambiguity about it. It's really just like, what

0:48:22.280 --> 0:48:23.560
<v Speaker 2>do you mean by this word?

0:48:23.840 --> 0:48:25.879
<v Speaker 1>I think the basic idea is that it is true

0:48:25.880 --> 0:48:28.080
<v Speaker 1>that the faster you move, the harder it is to

0:48:28.120 --> 0:48:30.719
<v Speaker 1>move faster, and so we should think about that as

0:48:30.800 --> 0:48:33.320
<v Speaker 1>just momentum getting more and more expensive the closer you

0:48:33.360 --> 0:48:35.880
<v Speaker 1>get to the speed of light, and not use the

0:48:35.880 --> 0:48:39.279
<v Speaker 1>word mass to think about how hard things are to

0:48:39.280 --> 0:48:40.200
<v Speaker 1>move at those speeds.

0:48:40.440 --> 0:48:43.400
<v Speaker 2>Yep, the universe has a higher tax for momentum millionaires.

0:48:43.480 --> 0:48:46.880
<v Speaker 1>It's a progressive universe. Bernie Sanders and AOC would.

0:48:46.680 --> 0:48:48.760
<v Speaker 2>Be proud until they start their own space company.

0:48:49.000 --> 0:48:51.120
<v Speaker 1>All right, well, we hope you enjoyed that. Thanks for

0:48:51.239 --> 0:48:52.680
<v Speaker 1>joining us, See you next time.

0:49:00.480 --> 0:49:03.280
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening, and remember that Daniel and Jorge explain

0:49:03.360 --> 0:49:07.279
<v Speaker 2>the Universe is a production of iHeartRadio. For more podcasts

0:49:07.360 --> 0:49:12.000
<v Speaker 2>from iHeartRadio, visit the iHeartRadio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:49:12.080 --> 0:49:13.800
<v Speaker 2>you listen to your favorite shows.