WEBVTT - From the Vault: The Parrotfish, Part 2

0:00:06.160 --> 0:00:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind. It is

0:00:08.800 --> 0:00:11.280
<v Speaker 1>another Vault day here for you. So we have the

0:00:11.320 --> 0:00:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Parrotfish Part two. It originally published five three, twenty twenty four.

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:19.720
<v Speaker 1>I hope you enjoy.

0:00:20.520 --> 0:00:24.600
<v Speaker 2>Welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind production of iHeartRadio.

0:00:30.360 --> 0:00:32.560
<v Speaker 1>Hey, welcome to Stuff to Blow your Mind. My name

0:00:32.600 --> 0:00:33.640
<v Speaker 1>is Robert Lamb.

0:00:33.600 --> 0:00:36.000
<v Speaker 3>And I am Joe McCormick, and we're back with Part

0:00:36.040 --> 0:00:40.160
<v Speaker 3>two in our series on parrotfish, a group of related

0:00:40.240 --> 0:00:44.879
<v Speaker 3>fishes containing about ninety to one hundred species worldwide, notable

0:00:45.000 --> 0:00:48.839
<v Speaker 3>for their powerful beak like mouths made out of rows

0:00:48.840 --> 0:00:53.600
<v Speaker 3>of fused teeth. In the previous episode, we talked about

0:00:53.640 --> 0:00:57.680
<v Speaker 3>some basics about the biology and taxonomy of parrotfish species.

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:01.960
<v Speaker 3>We talked about their diet and feeding behavior. Parrot Fish

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:06.520
<v Speaker 3>are usually considered herbivores or something equivalent to herbivores. They

0:01:06.560 --> 0:01:11.040
<v Speaker 3>survive by grazing for algae, microorganisms, to trite us, and

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:15.399
<v Speaker 3>sometimes invertebrate animals like coral polyps along the surfaces of

0:01:15.560 --> 0:01:20.400
<v Speaker 3>rocks and coral skeletons within coral reef environments. We talked

0:01:20.480 --> 0:01:24.280
<v Speaker 3>about the fact that some parrotfish species end up biting

0:01:24.600 --> 0:01:28.959
<v Speaker 3>or scraping off significant chunks of hard matter from the

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:31.960
<v Speaker 3>rocks and coral that they scour for food, and then

0:01:32.080 --> 0:01:37.440
<v Speaker 3>grinding up these coral skeletons and minerals in their phryngial mills.

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:40.720
<v Speaker 3>It's kind of like horror movie machinery in the back

0:01:40.760 --> 0:01:42.560
<v Speaker 3>of their throats. I think we compared it to like

0:01:42.600 --> 0:01:47.200
<v Speaker 3>a bone transmission gear and then defecating what's left in

0:01:47.240 --> 0:01:50.240
<v Speaker 3>the form of sand. And so as a result, parrotfish

0:01:50.280 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 3>are major figures in the erosion of coral reefs and

0:01:53.520 --> 0:01:56.240
<v Speaker 3>in the production of sand. So if you walk across

0:01:56.320 --> 0:01:59.240
<v Speaker 3>a white sandy beach in the tropics where there are

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 3>coral reefs nearby, there is a good chance that most

0:02:02.400 --> 0:02:05.279
<v Speaker 3>of the sand under your feet was at one point

0:02:05.360 --> 0:02:09.040
<v Speaker 3>parrotfish poop. This is true of reef islands built entirely

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 3>out of reef sediment, like the Maldives, but also true

0:02:12.240 --> 0:02:15.080
<v Speaker 3>of some white sandy beaches in places like Hawaii and

0:02:15.120 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 3>the Caribbean. We talked also about writings on parrotfish from

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 3>the ancient world, how the Romans prized certain parrotfishes as

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 3>food items, and why they thought they were in first

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 3>place among the culinary uses of fish. How they developed

0:02:30.240 --> 0:02:32.840
<v Speaker 3>a range of beliefs about these fish, some of which

0:02:32.880 --> 0:02:36.720
<v Speaker 3>were fairly biologically accurate, such as the belief that these

0:02:36.760 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 3>fish are herbivorous grazers they sort of are, and that

0:02:40.800 --> 0:02:44.160
<v Speaker 3>they produce audible sounds underwater as they scrape the rocks

0:02:44.200 --> 0:02:47.400
<v Speaker 3>and coral for food, also true. Other beliefs not quite

0:02:47.480 --> 0:02:50.200
<v Speaker 3>so accurate. For example, Rob, didn't you talk about this

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:53.680
<v Speaker 3>idea that they like cooperate altruistically to save one another

0:02:53.720 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 3>from traps?

0:02:55.040 --> 0:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Yes, and in this became an enduring and long lasting

0:02:59.320 --> 0:03:02.799
<v Speaker 1>symbol of free which doesn't really hold up to how

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:03.760
<v Speaker 1>they actually behave.

0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:07.040
<v Speaker 3>But we also talked last time about some interesting beliefs

0:03:07.080 --> 0:03:11.119
<v Speaker 3>about parrotfishes in Hawaiian mythology, where the parrotfish is sort

0:03:11.160 --> 0:03:14.440
<v Speaker 3>of a progenitor of other sea life and enters into

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:18.560
<v Speaker 3>a pact with a Hawaiian mythical hero who can sort

0:03:18.560 --> 0:03:22.360
<v Speaker 3>of call upon his friendship with the parrotfish in order

0:03:22.400 --> 0:03:25.600
<v Speaker 3>to produce an abundance of fish catch for the people.

0:03:26.320 --> 0:03:29.440
<v Speaker 3>And then finally, we also talked about research on parrotfish teeth,

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:32.400
<v Speaker 3>which are made out of some of the hardest, stiffest,

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:36.040
<v Speaker 3>and most resilient biominerals known even to the extent that

0:03:36.080 --> 0:03:39.360
<v Speaker 3>they are being investigated as a model for high durability

0:03:39.640 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 3>synthetic materials in the lab. So that was part one,

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 3>and today we're back to talk some more about parrotfish.

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, and I just want to drive home that if

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:52.600
<v Speaker 1>you haven't had the opportunity to observe parrotfish in the wild,

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 1>and you find yourself traveling to or in an area

0:03:56.760 --> 0:04:00.920
<v Speaker 1>where there are reef environments and there is some manner

0:04:00.960 --> 0:04:04.680
<v Speaker 1>of snorkeling going on, go check it out. Oftentimes, you

0:04:04.720 --> 0:04:08.520
<v Speaker 1>know there are various snorkeling companies and and you know

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:12.560
<v Speaker 1>small businesses that are that are very approachable. You don't

0:04:12.600 --> 0:04:15.120
<v Speaker 1>have to have a lot of experience to try these out. Again,

0:04:15.120 --> 0:04:19.160
<v Speaker 1>these are often we're talking like shallow water environments, and

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 1>in these environments there's almost always some sort of parrotfish

0:04:23.480 --> 0:04:27.400
<v Speaker 1>to observe. And if that's not your cup of tea,

0:04:27.920 --> 0:04:30.200
<v Speaker 1>I want to add that for anyone who would like

0:04:30.200 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 1>to see various parrotfish in action as well as other fish,

0:04:33.240 --> 0:04:36.839
<v Speaker 1>I highly recommend checking out Coral City Camera. It's that's

0:04:36.839 --> 0:04:39.600
<v Speaker 1>just Coralcitycamera dot com, or you can look it up

0:04:39.600 --> 0:04:43.479
<v Speaker 1>and search it's an underwater camera streaming live from an

0:04:43.600 --> 0:04:47.600
<v Speaker 1>urban coral reef in Miami, Florida. Uh, it's it's pretty cool,

0:04:47.800 --> 0:04:51.360
<v Speaker 1>and if you watch long enough, you will see some parrotfish.

0:04:50.800 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 3>In action, pursuing their new career as streamers.

0:04:54.279 --> 0:04:57.920
<v Speaker 1>Yes. Yes, so we're going to get into parrotfish reproduction

0:04:58.440 --> 0:05:01.000
<v Speaker 1>here in a bit. But first up, we have this

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 1>other delightful area to look at something that I wasn't

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:07.280
<v Speaker 1>familiar with at all concerning parrotfish. Joe, do you want

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:08.640
<v Speaker 1>to get into their mucus?

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:11.360
<v Speaker 3>Oh? Do? I? I feel like I'm already into their mucus.

0:05:11.440 --> 0:05:15.039
<v Speaker 3>I've been in it all day. So I mentioned in

0:05:15.080 --> 0:05:18.920
<v Speaker 3>the previous episode that the topic of parrotfish was one

0:05:18.960 --> 0:05:21.840
<v Speaker 3>that I initially got interested in just by looking at pictures.

0:05:21.920 --> 0:05:22.080
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:05:22.200 --> 0:05:25.400
<v Speaker 3>I was looking at like a photo of a parrotfish mouth,

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 3>and I started thinking, what is going on with this

0:05:28.279 --> 0:05:32.040
<v Speaker 3>awesome palisade of fused together teeth? And so there is

0:05:32.120 --> 0:05:35.279
<v Speaker 3>another parrotfish subtopic that I think one could come to

0:05:35.360 --> 0:05:40.240
<v Speaker 3>in exactly the same manner, and that is their mucus cocoons.

0:05:40.920 --> 0:05:45.279
<v Speaker 3>If you look for photos of parrotfish sleeping, you will

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:49.440
<v Speaker 3>find images of these animals nestled down into cozy little

0:05:49.560 --> 0:05:52.839
<v Speaker 3>niches in the seafloor or within the reef structure, sometimes

0:05:52.880 --> 0:05:56.040
<v Speaker 3>kind of in a recess or a little heidi hole

0:05:56.080 --> 0:05:59.719
<v Speaker 3>in the reef, surrounded by what looks like some kind

0:05:59.800 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 3>of of film. Sometimes it looks like the parrotfish is

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:09.360
<v Speaker 3>enclosed within a gauzy, transparent orb covered like sometimes covered

0:06:09.360 --> 0:06:12.640
<v Speaker 3>in glitter. If you see these in motion and rob

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:15.240
<v Speaker 3>below the photos here, I did attach a link to

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 3>a video in the outline that you can look at

0:06:17.120 --> 0:06:19.839
<v Speaker 3>so you can see it moving. If you see these

0:06:19.880 --> 0:06:22.479
<v Speaker 3>in motion, they will they will appear to undulate in

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:26.039
<v Speaker 3>the water, so they're kind of jelly like in movement

0:06:26.120 --> 0:06:30.760
<v Speaker 3>and substance. In other cases, this film looks like the

0:06:30.839 --> 0:06:34.679
<v Speaker 3>fish is wrapped up inside a huge funnel spider web

0:06:34.760 --> 0:06:38.640
<v Speaker 3>that's just covered in sand. Which funny thing about that

0:06:38.720 --> 0:06:41.880
<v Speaker 3>the sand may of course be the parrotfish's own excretion

0:06:42.040 --> 0:06:42.640
<v Speaker 3>from earlier.

0:06:43.120 --> 0:06:45.760
<v Speaker 1>MM. Yeah, I'm looking at the video footage right now.

0:06:45.800 --> 0:06:49.560
<v Speaker 1>It's it's slimy but beautiful.

0:06:50.200 --> 0:06:54.919
<v Speaker 3>So what is this gossamer bubble around a slumbering fish.

0:06:55.640 --> 0:06:59.479
<v Speaker 3>This is what's known as the parrotfish's mucous cocoon. Or

0:06:59.520 --> 0:07:04.840
<v Speaker 3>sometimes in the scientific literature, it's mucus envelope, described by

0:07:04.839 --> 0:07:08.039
<v Speaker 3>an author named H. E. Win in a scientific article

0:07:08.320 --> 0:07:13.080
<v Speaker 3>in nineteen fifty five as a quote thin, transparent and

0:07:13.160 --> 0:07:17.960
<v Speaker 3>gelatinous mucoid substance which starts as a fold at the

0:07:18.080 --> 0:07:22.680
<v Speaker 3>mouth and progresses backwards in folds to surround the body.

0:07:24.160 --> 0:07:28.680
<v Speaker 3>So parrotfish are daytime animals. They sleep during the night,

0:07:28.760 --> 0:07:32.240
<v Speaker 3>they wake and feed during the day, and some species

0:07:32.280 --> 0:07:36.679
<v Speaker 3>have been observed to spend roughly an hour before sleep

0:07:37.280 --> 0:07:41.680
<v Speaker 3>generating this jelly like sleeping bag out of mucus from

0:07:41.760 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 3>their mouths before actually getting to sleep, so it's like

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:49.040
<v Speaker 3>a bedtime routine. As night is falling, they start spitting

0:07:49.080 --> 0:07:52.200
<v Speaker 3>out the mucus and it starts to envelop their body

0:07:52.240 --> 0:07:55.920
<v Speaker 3>from front to back. So the fish are making themselves

0:07:56.040 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 3>bedtime slime sacks. But why now? First, this is a

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:03.400
<v Speaker 3>side note. I just wanted to say it is normal

0:08:03.840 --> 0:08:07.600
<v Speaker 3>for all kinds of fish species, not just parrotfish or

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:12.360
<v Speaker 3>the other related fish. Like some rasses that make these

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:15.240
<v Speaker 3>slime sacks. It is normal for all kinds of fish

0:08:15.360 --> 0:08:17.640
<v Speaker 3>to be covered in a thin layer of mucus on

0:08:17.680 --> 0:08:22.000
<v Speaker 3>the outside of their skin. This omnipresent slime barrier can

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:25.200
<v Speaker 3>provide a number of benefits, one of which is OSMO regulation,

0:08:25.600 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 3>and that's maintaining the balance of internal water and solutes

0:08:30.840 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 3>such as electrolytes, so for example, and OSMO regulation function

0:08:35.040 --> 0:08:38.439
<v Speaker 3>within our bodies human bodies is maintaining the right level

0:08:38.480 --> 0:08:42.120
<v Speaker 3>of salt in our body fluids. Mucous coverings on all

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 3>kinds of fish help with OSMO regulation. But these mucous

0:08:47.160 --> 0:08:49.960
<v Speaker 3>coverings on the skin also cut down on friction. So

0:08:50.000 --> 0:08:53.840
<v Speaker 3>the slippery layer of mucus on the fish's skin makes

0:08:53.880 --> 0:08:57.200
<v Speaker 3>it easier for the fish to swim along. It's like

0:08:57.240 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 3>a lubricant for the interface with the surrounding water. It's

0:09:01.440 --> 0:09:04.880
<v Speaker 3>also just physical protection of the skin from contact trauma

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:08.559
<v Speaker 3>such as cuts and scrapes. It in some cases provides

0:09:09.120 --> 0:09:13.200
<v Speaker 3>UV radiation protection. In some cases might protect the fish

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:17.040
<v Speaker 3>from noxious chemicals or pollutants in the water, and provides

0:09:17.120 --> 0:09:19.120
<v Speaker 3>the fish protection against drying out.

0:09:20.200 --> 0:09:22.440
<v Speaker 1>So this is of course one of the potential issues.

0:09:22.480 --> 0:09:24.679
<v Speaker 1>And just handling fish such as then like ketch and

0:09:24.760 --> 0:09:27.760
<v Speaker 1>release and so forth. The slime isn't just something that's

0:09:27.760 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 1>on the fish. It's an active barrier.

0:09:30.360 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but that's all just the normal mucous coating common

0:09:33.840 --> 0:09:36.400
<v Speaker 3>to many many fish. What we're talking about here is

0:09:36.400 --> 0:09:41.760
<v Speaker 3>specifically this baggy mucous hyper sleep pod that forms around

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:45.160
<v Speaker 3>some parrotfish and rasses through the night. So I started

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:47.720
<v Speaker 3>looking at scientific papers about this to see what I

0:09:47.720 --> 0:09:50.960
<v Speaker 3>could find out. So first I was looking at a

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:54.920
<v Speaker 3>marine zoology paper from the year nineteen seventy that investigated

0:09:54.920 --> 0:09:58.200
<v Speaker 3>a few species of parrotfish to see how and under

0:09:58.240 --> 0:10:02.160
<v Speaker 3>what conditions the fish would make these cocoons. So this

0:10:02.200 --> 0:10:05.360
<v Speaker 3>is by John E. Byrne, who was a professor of

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:08.800
<v Speaker 3>zoology at the University of Hawaii. The paper is called

0:10:08.880 --> 0:10:13.840
<v Speaker 3>Mucus envelope formation in two species of Hawaiian parrotfishes, and

0:10:13.880 --> 0:10:17.200
<v Speaker 3>the paper begins by citing previous research by Win and

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 3>co authors on parrotfish from the coral reefs of Bermuda,

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:25.480
<v Speaker 3>which were observed to make mucus envelopes at night. So

0:10:25.720 --> 0:10:28.960
<v Speaker 3>when and a co author named Bardak argued that the

0:10:29.000 --> 0:10:33.480
<v Speaker 3>purpose of the mucus cocoon of the slimesack was to

0:10:33.600 --> 0:10:38.959
<v Speaker 3>protect the parrotfish from predators while it was sleeping. And

0:10:39.000 --> 0:10:42.439
<v Speaker 3>this is a hypothesis that I've seen repeated in a

0:10:42.520 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 3>number of sources that maybe somehow the mucus covering will

0:10:47.280 --> 0:10:50.640
<v Speaker 3>help alert the fish more quickly if a predator gets

0:10:50.679 --> 0:10:53.520
<v Speaker 3>close to it, or may in some way help mask

0:10:53.720 --> 0:10:57.520
<v Speaker 3>the fish, maybe mask the fish is sent from predators,

0:10:57.960 --> 0:11:00.640
<v Speaker 3>or provide some kind of benefit along these lines.

0:11:01.080 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Okay, So either to some degree a cloaking system, a

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:07.160
<v Speaker 1>cloaking device, if you will, or perhaps some sort of

0:11:07.200 --> 0:11:10.040
<v Speaker 1>like added security trip wire made out of mucus.

0:11:10.640 --> 0:11:12.800
<v Speaker 3>There you go. Now we'll get to another explanation in

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:14.560
<v Speaker 3>just a bit here, but we're not there quite yet.

0:11:14.600 --> 0:11:16.960
<v Speaker 3>First we're gonna look at like how and how and

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 3>when these things form. So the author of the study,

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 3>John Burn, begins by investigating envelope formation in a couple

0:11:24.559 --> 0:11:28.720
<v Speaker 3>of different species of parrotfish. There's scare Us dubious, commonly

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:34.160
<v Speaker 3>known as the regal parrotfish, and scaus parsp pair. Oh wow,

0:11:34.640 --> 0:11:38.520
<v Speaker 3>here's a word, pers bisilatis. There you go, which is

0:11:38.559 --> 0:11:42.160
<v Speaker 3>commonly called the spectacled parrotfish. Both are found in the

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:45.920
<v Speaker 3>reefs around Hawaii, and I think the spectacled parrotfish may

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:49.200
<v Speaker 3>be one of the keyfish referred to as oohu and

0:11:49.280 --> 0:11:51.920
<v Speaker 3>some of the Hawaiian legends that we talked about in

0:11:51.960 --> 0:11:52.880
<v Speaker 3>the last episode.

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:55.359
<v Speaker 1>Yeah. Yeah, So burn.

0:11:55.360 --> 0:11:58.439
<v Speaker 3>Did some experiments on these two species in his laboratory,

0:11:58.840 --> 0:12:03.320
<v Speaker 3>varying conditions of light and darkness within their aquaria, making

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:07.720
<v Speaker 3>observations of behavior, and then examining the mucus producing organs.

0:12:08.080 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 3>So Previous field observations had found that as daylight intensities decrease.

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:17.679
<v Speaker 3>As daylight goes down, fewer parrotfishes can be found swimming

0:12:17.679 --> 0:12:21.160
<v Speaker 3>around the reefs for the night time, these fish will

0:12:21.480 --> 0:12:25.000
<v Speaker 3>disperse their schools and go into recesses within the reef

0:12:25.040 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 3>to hide and sleep, and that's where they generate these cocoons.

0:12:29.760 --> 0:12:33.080
<v Speaker 3>Within the lab environment, Burne found that if you shine

0:12:33.120 --> 0:12:36.640
<v Speaker 3>a constant light on these fish for twenty four hours straight,

0:12:37.080 --> 0:12:39.719
<v Speaker 3>they will actually never make a mucus cocoon. You just

0:12:39.840 --> 0:12:41.920
<v Speaker 3>keep shining the light on them, at least for twenty

0:12:41.920 --> 0:12:44.920
<v Speaker 3>four hours. He didn't push the experiment to go that

0:12:45.040 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 3>much longer, because you know, it might just end up

0:12:48.120 --> 0:12:50.960
<v Speaker 3>harming them overall. But for twenty four hours straight, you

0:12:51.000 --> 0:12:53.880
<v Speaker 3>shine a light on them and it, you know, nothing happens.

0:12:54.200 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, corp, of course, I mean, there are a lot

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:58.439
<v Speaker 1>of things I'm not going to do of some sort

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:03.360
<v Speaker 1>of an intelligent being from highly advanced species shines artificial

0:13:03.400 --> 0:13:04.880
<v Speaker 1>light on me for twenty four hours.

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:07.360
<v Speaker 3>That's right, So the constant light means you never make

0:13:07.400 --> 0:13:10.559
<v Speaker 3>a pod. However, when darkness was introduced, you turned the

0:13:10.640 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 3>lights off. This triggered twenty two of the thirty parrot

0:13:14.559 --> 0:13:18.200
<v Speaker 3>fish tested to build mucous envelopes, and it was the

0:13:18.240 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 3>same frequency in the two different species. The fish took

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:25.880
<v Speaker 3>different amounts of time to finish building their envelopes after

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:29.000
<v Speaker 3>the light was turned off. The minimum was like thirty minutes,

0:13:29.080 --> 0:13:32.360
<v Speaker 3>maximum was two hundred and forty minutes. Average building time

0:13:32.559 --> 0:13:36.880
<v Speaker 3>was about seventy minutes. However, if you kept the fish

0:13:37.000 --> 0:13:39.640
<v Speaker 3>the parrot fish in the dark after it made its cocoon,

0:13:40.360 --> 0:13:42.760
<v Speaker 3>it did not stay in the cocoon forever. Eventually it

0:13:42.760 --> 0:13:46.760
<v Speaker 3>would emerge on its own. So what did they do

0:13:46.840 --> 0:13:50.120
<v Speaker 3>when they made these things? They would typically rest their

0:13:50.160 --> 0:13:54.040
<v Speaker 3>bodies on the floor of the tank and the seafloor

0:13:54.080 --> 0:13:57.000
<v Speaker 3>in the wild in an upright position, almost always with

0:13:57.120 --> 0:14:00.559
<v Speaker 3>one side of the body resting against a vertical surface

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:02.960
<v Speaker 3>like a rock or a coral wall, or, in the

0:14:02.960 --> 0:14:06.280
<v Speaker 3>case of the lab experiments, the aquarium wall, and then

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 3>the cocoon begins. It begins formation at the front of

0:14:10.280 --> 0:14:15.080
<v Speaker 3>the fish around its mouth, and folds of mucus slowly

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 3>move back along the length of the body toward the tail.

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:23.880
<v Speaker 3>Though interestingly, the mucus never completely closes over the body.

0:14:24.240 --> 0:14:26.800
<v Speaker 3>There is always at least a one to two centimeter

0:14:27.000 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 3>gap at the back end of the bubble, and Burn

0:14:29.960 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 3>believes this hole is to evacuate respiratory water that's forced

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 3>out of the buckle cavity, so sort of a breathing hole. Now,

0:14:39.480 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 3>I mentioned that in a lot of these photos, the

0:14:41.480 --> 0:14:44.840
<v Speaker 3>mucus coccoon seems to sparkle as if it is covered

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:49.080
<v Speaker 3>in glitter. Burn writes that quote fine debris adhered to

0:14:49.120 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 3>the envelope's exterior and the outline was thus more clearly defined. However,

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:57.000
<v Speaker 3>he says this coating of sediment and debris makes the

0:14:57.040 --> 0:15:00.840
<v Speaker 3>bubble appear thin and delicate. This is how Wind described

0:15:00.880 --> 0:15:05.280
<v Speaker 3>it in that article from the fifties. But Burn did

0:15:05.320 --> 0:15:10.480
<v Speaker 3>an experiment by injecting pigmented particles into the cocoon and

0:15:10.600 --> 0:15:13.720
<v Speaker 3>revealed that actually appearances can be deceiving here because the

0:15:13.760 --> 0:15:16.800
<v Speaker 3>cocoon often does look very thin. It's like a you know,

0:15:16.880 --> 0:15:21.880
<v Speaker 3>wispy spider web or this very very thin kind of

0:15:21.880 --> 0:15:24.760
<v Speaker 3>gossamer like material. But in fact he found when he

0:15:24.960 --> 0:15:28.720
<v Speaker 3>injected the pigmented particles in there, the mucus structure was

0:15:28.920 --> 0:15:32.040
<v Speaker 3>up to six centimeters thick in some places. So it's

0:15:32.080 --> 0:15:33.960
<v Speaker 3>not as wispy as it looks.

0:15:33.960 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 1>Okay, This would just be the case of there being

0:15:35.920 --> 0:15:40.720
<v Speaker 1>like a thin layer of particles on top of this

0:15:41.200 --> 0:15:45.720
<v Speaker 1>otherwise translucent or semi translucent mucus shielding. They would give

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:48.080
<v Speaker 1>it the appearance of being super thin when in fact

0:15:48.120 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 1>it is probably thicker.

0:15:49.920 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 3>That's right. So dissection of the fish revealed that the

0:15:54.440 --> 0:15:59.280
<v Speaker 3>presence of gland tissue in the buckle cavity correlated with

0:15:59.400 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 3>whether or not the fish would make a cocoon. It

0:16:02.040 --> 0:16:05.320
<v Speaker 3>was found that fish that did not have this gland

0:16:05.440 --> 0:16:08.800
<v Speaker 3>tissue in the mouth cavity, they did not form the

0:16:08.920 --> 0:16:13.680
<v Speaker 3>mucus cocoons. So that's how they're made and win. But

0:16:13.720 --> 0:16:17.000
<v Speaker 3>what are they for? Well, again, the burn paper mentions

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 3>this hypothesis that the mucus sleeping bag somehow protects the

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 3>fish from large predators. A commonly mentioned predator in the

0:16:25.560 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 3>reef environment would be the more eel. You know, and

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:30.400
<v Speaker 3>it can get down there in the recesses and attack.

0:16:31.000 --> 0:16:34.720
<v Speaker 3>But apparently there's some doubt about this because, for example,

0:16:34.720 --> 0:16:37.920
<v Speaker 3>when faced with reef dwelling predators such as more eels,

0:16:38.320 --> 0:16:42.040
<v Speaker 3>there is some evidence that sleeping fish within within a

0:16:42.120 --> 0:16:46.680
<v Speaker 3>cocoon are still vulnerable, like they still get eaten. But

0:16:46.800 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 3>actually I came across an interesting twenty eleven paper that

0:16:49.960 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 3>looked directly into the function of the mucus cocoon and

0:16:53.800 --> 0:16:57.040
<v Speaker 3>came to a different conclusion. So this was published in

0:16:57.080 --> 0:17:00.920
<v Speaker 3>the journal Biology Letters by Grutterer at All and the

0:17:01.040 --> 0:17:03.360
<v Speaker 3>title is this will give some of the findings away

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:09.080
<v Speaker 3>fish mucus cocoons the mosquito nets of the sea. This

0:17:09.160 --> 0:17:12.399
<v Speaker 3>was in the year twenty eleven. So in this paper

0:17:12.440 --> 0:17:16.280
<v Speaker 3>the authors look at another hypothesis, which is the idea

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:21.600
<v Speaker 3>that mucus envelopes actually protect the fish inside from parasites

0:17:21.880 --> 0:17:27.840
<v Speaker 3>such as ectoparasitic nathid isopods. These are these little bloodsucking

0:17:27.920 --> 0:17:32.160
<v Speaker 3>parasites that live throughout the ocean, often compared to terrestrial

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:36.719
<v Speaker 3>mosquitoes and ticks. Raw I attached to a little photo

0:17:36.760 --> 0:17:38.479
<v Speaker 3>of these things for you to look at. They're kind

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 3>of shrimp like in appearance maybe look like a cross

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 3>between a shrimp and a tick. Yeah yeah, And the

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:48.159
<v Speaker 3>authors point out that during the daytime, when parrotfish are

0:17:48.240 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 3>swimming around, they actually get some help. They get some

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:56.239
<v Speaker 3>protection against blood drinking isopods from cleaner fish. You know,

0:17:56.320 --> 0:17:59.359
<v Speaker 3>this is a relationship where a smaller fish that wants

0:17:59.400 --> 0:18:03.440
<v Speaker 3>to eat these parasites will come along and help pick

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:06.040
<v Speaker 3>them off to sort of groom the outside of the

0:18:06.480 --> 0:18:11.080
<v Speaker 3>larger fish. But how do the fish protect themselves at night.

0:18:11.600 --> 0:18:14.640
<v Speaker 3>The idea behind this experiment was that maybe the mucus

0:18:14.640 --> 0:18:18.640
<v Speaker 3>cocoon functions like a mosquito net to protect the sleeping

0:18:18.720 --> 0:18:24.399
<v Speaker 3>fish from these heimatophagous parasites. So they tested this hypothesis

0:18:24.440 --> 0:18:29.199
<v Speaker 3>on the coral reef parrotfish Chlorurus sordid us. And the

0:18:29.200 --> 0:18:31.160
<v Speaker 3>way they tested it was they got some of these fish,

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:34.440
<v Speaker 3>they separated them into groups that would sleep with and

0:18:34.600 --> 0:18:38.240
<v Speaker 3>without the benefit of cocoons in the presence of these

0:18:38.240 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 3>isopod parasites. And actually, the way they did it was

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:45.240
<v Speaker 3>they took a subset of cocoon fish and found a

0:18:45.240 --> 0:18:47.480
<v Speaker 3>way to sort of gently push them out of their

0:18:47.560 --> 0:18:53.119
<v Speaker 3>envelopes without waking them up. So what do they find Yes, indeed,

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:57.480
<v Speaker 3>the fish without the mucus bag experienced way more attacks

0:18:57.520 --> 0:19:01.359
<v Speaker 3>by parasites. How much more well, about ninety five percent

0:19:01.400 --> 0:19:05.320
<v Speaker 3>of the fish without cocoons were attacked by isopods and

0:19:05.359 --> 0:19:08.640
<v Speaker 3>only about ten percent of the fish with cocoons were attacked.

0:19:08.800 --> 0:19:12.000
<v Speaker 1>So huge difference, all right, Right, so yeah, coming back

0:19:12.000 --> 0:19:15.400
<v Speaker 1>to the mosquito net comparisons, Like, initially we looked at

0:19:15.400 --> 0:19:17.600
<v Speaker 1>it and we're like, this mosquito net must protect the

0:19:17.640 --> 0:19:21.680
<v Speaker 1>sleeper from bears, but in reality it protects them from

0:19:21.920 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>mosquitoes and similar insects that sort of thing.

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:30.360
<v Speaker 3>Or maybe even something downstream from mosquitoes in the analogy here,

0:19:30.400 --> 0:19:34.960
<v Speaker 3>because the authors also investigated the question of how energetically

0:19:35.080 --> 0:19:39.199
<v Speaker 3>costly it is for the fish to make these mucous orbs,

0:19:39.680 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 3>and they calculated that it takes about two point five

0:19:42.400 --> 0:19:46.399
<v Speaker 3>percent of a fish's daily energy budget to make the

0:19:46.520 --> 0:19:50.040
<v Speaker 3>mucus bag. Now, when I first saw that figure, I

0:19:50.119 --> 0:19:52.280
<v Speaker 3>kind of thought, oh, hey, that seems fairly cheap, only

0:19:52.280 --> 0:19:55.800
<v Speaker 3>two point five percent. But actually I was reading some

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:59.919
<v Speaker 3>news reporting on this that quoted the lead author, Alexandra Grutterer,

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:03.560
<v Speaker 3>and she framed it a different way. She said, quote

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:06.320
<v Speaker 3>the amount of effort that goes into building these cocoons,

0:20:06.359 --> 0:20:09.879
<v Speaker 3>which requires fish to have developed very large glands about

0:20:09.880 --> 0:20:13.879
<v Speaker 3>the size of a quarter to produce the cocoons, is extraordinary.

0:20:14.480 --> 0:20:18.239
<v Speaker 3>Parasites must exert an enormous pressure on these fish in

0:20:18.359 --> 0:20:20.840
<v Speaker 3>order for the fish to have evolved such a specific

0:20:20.880 --> 0:20:24.760
<v Speaker 3>way of avoiding the parasites. So what could be so pressing?

0:20:24.840 --> 0:20:26.600
<v Speaker 3>Is it really just that you don't want to get

0:20:26.600 --> 0:20:29.119
<v Speaker 3>bitten by these isopods and have them drink some of

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:33.800
<v Speaker 3>your blood? Well, Grutterer mentions the possibility that the blood

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 3>directly lost to the parasite might not be the only cost.

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:43.480
<v Speaker 3>These isopods may also transmit a secondary endo parasite which

0:20:43.600 --> 0:20:48.280
<v Speaker 3>lives in the fish's blood, much like how mosquitoes transmit

0:20:48.400 --> 0:20:52.920
<v Speaker 3>malaria in humans. So the mosquitoes themselves are annoying and

0:20:53.040 --> 0:20:56.240
<v Speaker 3>you don't like the mosquitoes, but the malaria is much

0:20:56.280 --> 0:21:00.119
<v Speaker 3>more concerning than the mosquito. Malaria can be deadly in

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:03.080
<v Speaker 3>a similar way. It's possible that it's worth it for

0:21:03.160 --> 0:21:07.680
<v Speaker 3>these fish to build these slimy bionets to protect themselves

0:21:07.960 --> 0:21:11.879
<v Speaker 3>from blood disease. Wow, so it seems like a good trade.

0:21:11.960 --> 0:21:15.040
<v Speaker 3>You spend a little energy to weave a slime tube

0:21:15.560 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 3>before bed. Every night, you sleep without these tiny shrimp

0:21:19.119 --> 0:21:22.720
<v Speaker 3>monsters drinking your blood, possibly giving you diseases of the blood.

0:21:23.200 --> 0:21:25.199
<v Speaker 3>And it all works out. And in fact, there was

0:21:25.200 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 3>one more observation from grutter speaking to the media that

0:21:30.359 --> 0:21:33.480
<v Speaker 3>kind of maybe there's a strategy to recoop some of

0:21:33.480 --> 0:21:37.160
<v Speaker 3>that nightly cost. So Grutterer says, quote, I have observed

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:40.359
<v Speaker 3>on occasion a fish at dawn with what appeared to

0:21:40.400 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 3>be mucus stuffed in its mouth. And then she goes

0:21:44.600 --> 0:21:47.000
<v Speaker 3>on to say she has seen other fish, not parrotfish,

0:21:47.000 --> 0:21:51.959
<v Speaker 3>but related fish that also produce mucus cocoons pecking it

0:21:52.240 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 3>at its old cocoons in the morning. So like recooping

0:21:55.600 --> 0:21:59.000
<v Speaker 3>some of that nightly cost by eating the mucus that

0:21:59.040 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 3>you created before.

0:22:00.760 --> 0:22:03.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's just it's economically sound. It's like if

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:08.040
<v Speaker 1>humans produce, say an ectoplasm defense shield at night, you

0:22:08.080 --> 0:22:10.680
<v Speaker 1>would want to to recoup that cost, and that might

0:22:10.760 --> 0:22:13.199
<v Speaker 1>mean consuming all that actoplasm again and getting all that

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:17.840
<v Speaker 1>liquid back into your body. You know, it reminds us

0:22:17.840 --> 0:22:21.880
<v Speaker 1>of other examples we've looked at in biology, such as

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:26.200
<v Speaker 1>various reptiles that will eat their own shed skin because

0:22:26.359 --> 0:22:27.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, why waste that, you know.

0:22:28.040 --> 0:22:31.640
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so may still provide some kind of benefit against

0:22:31.960 --> 0:22:36.600
<v Speaker 3>larger macroscopic predators too. Not certain about that, but it

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:38.840
<v Speaker 3>does seem like there's a very good case that these

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:42.200
<v Speaker 3>mucous bags help prevent against parasite attacks.

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:55.440
<v Speaker 1>Very fascinating, all right, And so for the rest of

0:22:55.480 --> 0:22:57.720
<v Speaker 1>the episode, we're going to turn to the world of

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 1>parrot fish reproduction and pair fish sex. So, as we

0:23:02.040 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 1>teach out in the first episode, one of the other

0:23:04.600 --> 0:23:09.720
<v Speaker 1>amazing aspects of parrotfish biology broadly is that they change

0:23:09.760 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 1>sex during the course of a normal lifetime. That's to say,

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:16.680
<v Speaker 1>this is not something that occurs, you know, only when

0:23:16.680 --> 0:23:20.479
<v Speaker 1>certain environmental conditions are right. It occurs as part of

0:23:20.520 --> 0:23:22.440
<v Speaker 1>a normal life cycle.

0:23:22.520 --> 0:23:25.000
<v Speaker 3>And within a fairly predictable pattern, right.

0:23:25.200 --> 0:23:27.520
<v Speaker 1>That's right. Yeah, And they're going to be a couple

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:29.879
<v Speaker 1>of exceptions. Again, as we've been distressing, there are a

0:23:30.040 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 1>number of different species of parrotfish, but still the vast

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:40.960
<v Speaker 1>majority of them do follow this example that we're going

0:23:41.000 --> 0:23:46.640
<v Speaker 1>to be discussing. So they are proto gynos that means

0:23:46.680 --> 0:23:52.040
<v Speaker 1>female first, hermaphrodites that always turn into males if they

0:23:52.080 --> 0:23:54.920
<v Speaker 1>live long enough, so they're born female and then at

0:23:54.920 --> 0:23:58.199
<v Speaker 1>a certain point during their development they become male and

0:23:58.280 --> 0:24:00.560
<v Speaker 1>live out the rest of their life as a male.

0:24:00.840 --> 0:24:03.439
<v Speaker 3>And this would feedback into something we talked about in

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:08.280
<v Speaker 3>the first episode, which is sometimes difficulty in identifying parrotfish

0:24:08.320 --> 0:24:11.880
<v Speaker 3>species because they undergo these changes, and these changes come

0:24:11.960 --> 0:24:14.280
<v Speaker 3>with changes to their outer appearance.

0:24:14.520 --> 0:24:17.719
<v Speaker 1>That's right along the way, multiple changes in colorization take place,

0:24:18.119 --> 0:24:20.520
<v Speaker 1>some of which have to do with just aging, some

0:24:20.600 --> 0:24:23.680
<v Speaker 1>of which have to do with changing their sex, and

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:29.480
<v Speaker 1>others that have to do with diet and other factors.

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:33.639
<v Speaker 1>This pointed out by the National Marine Sanctuary Foundation as

0:24:33.800 --> 0:24:38.160
<v Speaker 1>resources about the parrotfish. I also want to point out though,

0:24:38.200 --> 0:24:43.240
<v Speaker 1>that according to NAA fishery biologist Ronald J. Saals, gonecharism

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:45.679
<v Speaker 1>has been reported for I think three species within the

0:24:45.720 --> 0:24:48.720
<v Speaker 1>parrotfish family, which is to say, there are at least

0:24:48.720 --> 0:24:51.920
<v Speaker 1>three species of parrotfish where we have the more typical

0:24:51.960 --> 0:24:55.720
<v Speaker 1>scenario of male female division as opposed to what we

0:24:55.800 --> 0:25:03.480
<v Speaker 1>predominantly see in parrotfish, which again is this this sequential

0:25:03.520 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 1>hermaphroditism in which the fish are born female and then

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:11.440
<v Speaker 1>if they live long enough, become male, live out the

0:25:11.440 --> 0:25:14.320
<v Speaker 1>rest of their life as males. And so the basic

0:25:14.359 --> 0:25:18.320
<v Speaker 1>scenario is most parrotfish are born females, continue to grow

0:25:18.760 --> 0:25:23.440
<v Speaker 1>to reproduce externally as females, generally in the harem of

0:25:23.480 --> 0:25:27.199
<v Speaker 1>a larger protective male who also tends to a grazing territory,

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:30.600
<v Speaker 1>and in time, if that female lives long enough and

0:25:30.680 --> 0:25:35.720
<v Speaker 1>grows large enough, she transitions into a larger terminal, reproductive male.

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 3>Interesting.

0:25:37.600 --> 0:25:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Now, in general, parrotfish experience what I've seen referred to

0:25:41.600 --> 0:25:46.520
<v Speaker 1>as moderate longevity. It's going to vary depending on the

0:25:46.560 --> 0:25:50.400
<v Speaker 1>particular specimen, and I think it even the general generalities

0:25:50.440 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 1>about how long they live is going to vary. I've

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:57.440
<v Speaker 1>seen in general parrotfish life span sited seven to ten years.

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I've seen it cited as less than twenty. I've also

0:26:00.359 --> 0:26:03.439
<v Speaker 1>seen it sighted as five to six. Again, we have

0:26:03.440 --> 0:26:05.320
<v Speaker 1>a number of different species we're talking about here, and

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:08.360
<v Speaker 1>I'll throw out additional numbers for a specific species here

0:26:08.359 --> 0:26:11.399
<v Speaker 1>in a bit. We also have to remind ourselves that

0:26:11.440 --> 0:26:14.960
<v Speaker 1>these are creatures living in the ocean, and so there

0:26:14.960 --> 0:26:18.520
<v Speaker 1>are a whole number of factors from blood diseases to

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:22.720
<v Speaker 1>parasites to eels trying to eat them. To human fishermen

0:26:22.760 --> 0:26:23.439
<v Speaker 1>and so forth.

0:26:23.600 --> 0:26:26.159
<v Speaker 3>It's just hard to imagine like ten straight years of

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:28.520
<v Speaker 3>biting and scraping on rocks with your teeth.

0:26:28.840 --> 0:26:35.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, we're literally scraping by right now. Parrotfish display what

0:26:36.000 --> 0:26:38.960
<v Speaker 1>is referred to as indeterminate growth, which means that there's

0:26:39.000 --> 0:26:42.200
<v Speaker 1>not a full sized growth limit. They just keep growing

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:45.920
<v Speaker 1>as long as they're alive. And so parrotfish just continue

0:26:45.960 --> 0:26:49.000
<v Speaker 1>to grow at a consistent rate. And this is important

0:26:49.040 --> 0:26:52.560
<v Speaker 1>to consider in making sense of their sex changes because

0:26:53.040 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 1>one of, if not the primary hypotheses for why they

0:26:57.119 --> 0:26:59.879
<v Speaker 1>do this, why they evolve to do this, does relate

0:26:59.920 --> 0:27:03.760
<v Speaker 1>to their size. Maximum size again, it's going to depend

0:27:03.840 --> 0:27:06.879
<v Speaker 1>on the species. I see ranges like one to four feet.

0:27:07.760 --> 0:27:09.640
<v Speaker 1>But let's go ahead and just talk about the biggest

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:12.320
<v Speaker 1>parrotfish just to give us like a nice frame of reference,

0:27:12.920 --> 0:27:16.440
<v Speaker 1>because also the largest parrotfish is also pretty gnarly.

0:27:17.800 --> 0:27:20.040
<v Speaker 3>Is this the bumphead we talked about last time?

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:22.080
<v Speaker 1>It is the bumphead, So we have a little more

0:27:22.119 --> 0:27:25.320
<v Speaker 1>on the bump head here. The bump head, according to

0:27:25.920 --> 0:27:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the NOAA, reaches size as a four point two feet

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:30.840
<v Speaker 1>long and up to one hundred pounds, So one hundred

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:34.600
<v Speaker 1>and thirty centimeters forty six kilograms, And not only are

0:27:34.640 --> 0:27:37.119
<v Speaker 1>they the largest parrotfish, but they're among the largest reef

0:27:37.119 --> 0:27:41.800
<v Speaker 1>fish period. Reef environments are generally shallow and tight, so

0:27:41.880 --> 0:27:45.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're not inviting places for larger fish. And

0:27:45.280 --> 0:27:49.560
<v Speaker 1>their namesake bump is used like a rams horns in

0:27:49.880 --> 0:27:54.800
<v Speaker 1>male to male competitions, though females also have smaller bumps, which,

0:27:54.840 --> 0:27:57.919
<v Speaker 1>of course, if the parrotfish lives long enough, is going

0:27:57.960 --> 0:27:59.960
<v Speaker 1>to grow in size once they have changed sect.

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:03.680
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so these are fish that just keep growing, even

0:28:03.720 --> 0:28:08.000
<v Speaker 3>though that's not necessarily the best for them in all ways,

0:28:08.040 --> 0:28:11.640
<v Speaker 3>like it might limit what coral surfaces they can access

0:28:11.680 --> 0:28:12.359
<v Speaker 3>and so forth.

0:28:12.560 --> 0:28:15.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, these guys are just bigger anyway. This is just

0:28:15.720 --> 0:28:17.840
<v Speaker 1>But this would I guess, seem to be like the

0:28:17.880 --> 0:28:21.639
<v Speaker 1>maximum size that seems to fit into the evolutionary economy

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:24.879
<v Speaker 1>of living around the reef. Okay, like I guess it

0:28:24.880 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 1>would be. It would be hard to argue that parrotfish

0:28:27.960 --> 0:28:31.439
<v Speaker 1>should get larger than this, because we have no living

0:28:31.480 --> 0:28:35.520
<v Speaker 1>parrotfish that get larger than this. I see, the market

0:28:35.520 --> 0:28:39.440
<v Speaker 1>won't allow it. You know, Now, bump head parrotfish can

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:42.720
<v Speaker 1>live to be forty years old. I've read they don't

0:28:42.720 --> 0:28:46.040
<v Speaker 1>reach sexual maturity until five to eight years old, and

0:28:46.080 --> 0:28:50.520
<v Speaker 1>sadly their numbers are down except in protected reef environments.

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:53.440
<v Speaker 3>So I believe based on what I've read, these are

0:28:53.480 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 3>the ones that are classic. When we talked about the

0:28:56.080 --> 0:29:01.760
<v Speaker 3>different classifications of parrotfish feed behaviors based on like sort

0:29:01.800 --> 0:29:04.240
<v Speaker 3>of how hard they gouge the rock or the coral,

0:29:04.680 --> 0:29:07.800
<v Speaker 3>and these would be like the excavators, right, like they

0:29:07.840 --> 0:29:09.640
<v Speaker 3>are plowing into that stuff.

0:29:09.840 --> 0:29:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, these guys take the big bites. I was reading

0:29:11.960 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more about this on the NOAA website

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:16.600
<v Speaker 1>and they said that, yeah, they take out those big

0:29:16.640 --> 0:29:19.800
<v Speaker 1>bites that also end up taking out a little bit

0:29:19.800 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 1>of live coral. But they stress that this is still

0:29:21.920 --> 0:29:24.120
<v Speaker 1>very healthy for the coral in all the ways we

0:29:24.200 --> 0:29:28.000
<v Speaker 1>already mentioned. I don't remember if we mentioned this. I

0:29:28.040 --> 0:29:29.640
<v Speaker 1>don't remember if we mentioned this or not. But there's

0:29:29.640 --> 0:29:33.280
<v Speaker 1>also the idea that they'll break down dead reef and

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:36.720
<v Speaker 1>of course turn that into sand, dead bits and branches

0:29:36.760 --> 0:29:39.680
<v Speaker 1>that might otherwise break off in storms and damage other

0:29:39.720 --> 0:29:40.560
<v Speaker 1>parts of the reef.

0:29:41.120 --> 0:29:43.560
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, I see, So it's better for it to

0:29:43.920 --> 0:29:46.320
<v Speaker 3>better for this chunk to get ground up in a

0:29:46.400 --> 0:29:50.720
<v Speaker 3>parrotfish's pharyngial mill and pooped out as sand rather than

0:29:50.800 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 3>knocked off in the storm and hit some other healthy

0:29:53.160 --> 0:29:53.840
<v Speaker 3>part of the reef.

0:29:54.120 --> 0:29:56.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, because it's one of the interesting things about about

0:29:57.720 --> 0:30:01.200
<v Speaker 1>reef environments, and this is something you're def only instructed

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:05.560
<v Speaker 1>about anytime you go out and snorkel or scuba dive.

0:30:05.640 --> 0:30:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Certainly I imagine around these these is that there is

0:30:08.920 --> 0:30:11.960
<v Speaker 1>like a hardness to them. Certainly they can also be

0:30:12.080 --> 0:30:14.840
<v Speaker 1>very like you certainly don't want to stand on them

0:30:14.960 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 1>or walk on them or touch them for a number

0:30:17.480 --> 0:30:20.560
<v Speaker 1>of reasons, because a lot of times they can be

0:30:20.640 --> 0:30:22.720
<v Speaker 1>quite harmful and scrape you out, they can cut you.

0:30:22.720 --> 0:30:25.280
<v Speaker 1>You don't want any of that. But on top of that,

0:30:25.320 --> 0:30:27.520
<v Speaker 1>they can be actually quite delicate, and they can be

0:30:27.560 --> 0:30:29.840
<v Speaker 1>easily broken. And so this would be another case of

0:30:29.880 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 1>where if the parrotfish are doing their thing, that limits

0:30:32.680 --> 0:30:36.480
<v Speaker 1>the amount of damage that they're going to sustain via

0:30:36.520 --> 0:30:38.240
<v Speaker 1>their own dead parts.

0:30:38.760 --> 0:30:39.160
<v Speaker 3>I see.

0:30:39.360 --> 0:30:42.560
<v Speaker 1>But anyway back to sex changes in parrotfish in general. So,

0:30:42.640 --> 0:30:46.480
<v Speaker 1>according to Jennifer Hodge, a postdoctoral researcher in the Department

0:30:46.480 --> 0:30:49.640
<v Speaker 1>of Evolution and Ecology in the UC Davis College of

0:30:49.680 --> 0:30:56.320
<v Speaker 1>Biological Sciences in twenty twenty. The indeterminate growth factor may

0:30:56.360 --> 0:30:58.200
<v Speaker 1>in fact be key. I was reading a couple of

0:31:00.160 --> 0:31:03.040
<v Speaker 1>from a couple of sources. Here. One is a UC

0:31:03.200 --> 0:31:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Davis article by Andy Fell covering her work titled male

0:31:08.080 --> 0:31:11.920
<v Speaker 1>size advantage drives evolution and sex change of sex change

0:31:11.920 --> 0:31:15.120
<v Speaker 1>in Refish. And then also there is a full paper

0:31:15.160 --> 0:31:16.880
<v Speaker 1>I was looking at, and this is by Hodge at

0:31:16.880 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 1>All titled Correlated Evolution of sex allocation and Mating system

0:31:21.960 --> 0:31:25.920
<v Speaker 1>in Rasses and Parrotfishes, published in The American Naturalist the

0:31:26.000 --> 0:31:26.560
<v Speaker 1>same year.

0:31:26.840 --> 0:31:31.160
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so how would this indeterminate growth factor affect how

0:31:31.360 --> 0:31:34.719
<v Speaker 3>sex is distributed and developed in a fish species.

0:31:35.120 --> 0:31:38.520
<v Speaker 1>It basically comes down to the fact the observation that

0:31:39.960 --> 0:31:43.480
<v Speaker 1>reproduction among parrotfish and also some of these other fish,

0:31:43.680 --> 0:31:47.800
<v Speaker 1>but for our interests here, the parrotfish is often dominated

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:49.880
<v Speaker 1>by large males.

0:31:49.720 --> 0:31:52.800
<v Speaker 3>Meaning that like, a larger male has a better chance

0:31:52.840 --> 0:31:53.920
<v Speaker 3>of mating more.

0:31:54.560 --> 0:31:58.840
<v Speaker 1>Right, and that and that male large males and this

0:31:58.880 --> 0:32:03.160
<v Speaker 1>would be the terminal mail in parrotfish fishes. They are

0:32:03.200 --> 0:32:06.520
<v Speaker 1>the ones dominating like all of the mating. So if

0:32:06.560 --> 0:32:08.840
<v Speaker 1>you are not a large male, you are just not

0:32:09.000 --> 0:32:13.400
<v Speaker 1>going to be effective at reproduction. If you are a

0:32:13.440 --> 0:32:17.880
<v Speaker 1>small parrotfish male, your chances of passing on your genes

0:32:18.320 --> 0:32:20.959
<v Speaker 1>is rather slim. And remember the genetic mission is to

0:32:21.040 --> 0:32:25.880
<v Speaker 1>pass on your genes. Now, as a small parrotfish female, however,

0:32:26.040 --> 0:32:28.960
<v Speaker 1>it's less of an issue. The bigger males, they have

0:32:29.040 --> 0:32:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the advantage. They're going to form these harems. If you

0:32:32.240 --> 0:32:34.000
<v Speaker 1>are a small female, you can be part of that

0:32:34.040 --> 0:32:37.920
<v Speaker 1>harem and you are doing your reproductive part as a parrotfish.

0:32:37.960 --> 0:32:41.480
<v Speaker 1>And so that's according to this hypothesis, this is where

0:32:41.600 --> 0:32:46.800
<v Speaker 1>the evolution of sequential hermaphrotitism evolves as a strategy by

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:51.040
<v Speaker 1>which all individuals have a better shot at participating in reproduction.

0:32:51.160 --> 0:32:54.760
<v Speaker 1>So start off small and female, you definitely get to reproduce.

0:32:55.120 --> 0:32:57.080
<v Speaker 1>And then if you live long enough and you grow

0:32:57.080 --> 0:33:01.400
<v Speaker 1>big enough, you shift to the male set, and then

0:33:01.640 --> 0:33:04.240
<v Speaker 1>you have the size to prove effective. You're better at

0:33:04.240 --> 0:33:07.720
<v Speaker 1>controlling territory resources, harems, etc.

0:33:08.520 --> 0:33:12.760
<v Speaker 3>That's interesting, Okay, So it gives more individuals of the

0:33:12.800 --> 0:33:15.360
<v Speaker 3>species a chance to mate more often.

0:33:16.440 --> 0:33:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Yes, yeah, that's the way I understand it. And I

0:33:19.040 --> 0:33:23.800
<v Speaker 1>was looking again at the writings of in Oa's fishery

0:33:23.800 --> 0:33:27.920
<v Speaker 1>biologist Ronald J. Salce and Salce points out that, yeah,

0:33:27.920 --> 0:33:32.760
<v Speaker 1>the largest parrotfish are always terminal males, and he points

0:33:32.800 --> 0:33:36.240
<v Speaker 1>out that the species, the various species in the genus

0:33:36.280 --> 0:33:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Skeras typically exhibit the following reproductive characteristics. So we see this.

0:33:41.280 --> 0:33:45.480
<v Speaker 1>First of all, there is this proto Guynus female first hermaphrotitism,

0:33:46.280 --> 0:33:48.640
<v Speaker 1>There are breeding territories, there are harems, and there is

0:33:48.720 --> 0:33:50.160
<v Speaker 1>external fertilization.

0:33:50.720 --> 0:33:53.520
<v Speaker 3>Oh yeah, the external fertilization is a good point, because

0:33:53.680 --> 0:33:55.760
<v Speaker 3>I don't want to give the wrong idea when I

0:33:55.800 --> 0:33:59.440
<v Speaker 3>was mentioning mating that it's like, you know, the kind

0:33:59.440 --> 0:34:02.640
<v Speaker 3>of active you might be picturing that. Instead, there's a

0:34:02.720 --> 0:34:07.120
<v Speaker 3>there's an external meeting of the game meats of these animals.

0:34:06.840 --> 0:34:10.360
<v Speaker 1>Right, And I think, I don't know humans, maybe we

0:34:10.400 --> 0:34:12.920
<v Speaker 1>have a problem imagining fish sex in general. But somehow

0:34:12.920 --> 0:34:15.320
<v Speaker 1>this makes it a little easier to sort of picture

0:34:15.360 --> 0:34:17.480
<v Speaker 1>how all this is happening. I think it's all out

0:34:17.480 --> 0:34:20.520
<v Speaker 1>in the open. So SAAL's points out though that in

0:34:20.560 --> 0:34:24.200
<v Speaker 1>the past, and really maybe not in the two distant past,

0:34:24.520 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 1>we've had these other hypotheses that there might be a

0:34:27.719 --> 0:34:32.800
<v Speaker 1>social trigger for the change in sex. But apparently, based

0:34:32.800 --> 0:34:35.600
<v Speaker 1>on what he wrote, this hasn't necessarily been observed, or

0:34:35.640 --> 0:34:39.400
<v Speaker 1>at least not in all cases or in a broad

0:34:39.520 --> 0:34:44.400
<v Speaker 1>array of cases, because we have scenarios where large terminal

0:34:44.440 --> 0:34:48.360
<v Speaker 1>males are removed from a population, such as by fishing,

0:34:48.760 --> 0:34:52.520
<v Speaker 1>and the females don't just switch over at an earlier age,

0:34:52.560 --> 0:34:55.000
<v Speaker 1>but rather have more difficulty finding a mate.

0:34:55.440 --> 0:34:57.919
<v Speaker 3>Oh okay, so it might be kind of baked in

0:34:58.000 --> 0:34:59.800
<v Speaker 3>that they need to reach a certain size.

0:35:00.239 --> 0:35:02.080
<v Speaker 1>Seems to be the case now, I don't, But again,

0:35:02.080 --> 0:35:04.680
<v Speaker 1>we're dealing with hypotheses here. I don't think that there

0:35:04.800 --> 0:35:07.960
<v Speaker 1>that anything is like one hundred percent proven out here.

0:35:07.960 --> 0:35:09.600
<v Speaker 1>There's still a lot of work that needs to be

0:35:09.640 --> 0:35:11.640
<v Speaker 1>done because a lot of it comes down to, Okay,

0:35:11.640 --> 0:35:15.400
<v Speaker 1>you can have this general idea that this practice evolved

0:35:15.520 --> 0:35:20.200
<v Speaker 1>because large males dominate reproduction and and it makes more

0:35:20.239 --> 0:35:23.040
<v Speaker 1>sense from a reproductive standpoint to start off as female

0:35:23.040 --> 0:35:25.120
<v Speaker 1>and then become male. But then what is the trigger

0:35:25.200 --> 0:35:28.520
<v Speaker 1>is it? Is it purely based on how big you grow?

0:35:29.080 --> 0:35:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Or are there environmental or social triggers? And Uh, ultimately

0:35:34.320 --> 0:35:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the size advantage explanation is just one hypothesis. Uh, there's

0:35:38.200 --> 0:35:41.200
<v Speaker 1>an you know, other hypotheses put more emphasis on possible

0:35:41.280 --> 0:35:46.560
<v Speaker 1>social or in mental environmental triggers such as changes and

0:35:46.600 --> 0:35:49.439
<v Speaker 1>in population density, that sort of thing, in the same

0:35:49.480 --> 0:35:52.320
<v Speaker 1>way that we see examples and say the world of salamanders,

0:35:52.360 --> 0:35:55.080
<v Speaker 1>where uh, you know something they're too many, or you know,

0:35:55.440 --> 0:35:58.879
<v Speaker 1>something goes on demographically in a collect in a certain group,

0:35:58.960 --> 0:36:02.680
<v Speaker 1>then you may have biological changes that result. But I

0:36:02.680 --> 0:36:06.840
<v Speaker 1>guess broadly if there are, if there are social or

0:36:06.960 --> 0:36:10.880
<v Speaker 1>environmental triggers that are involved in theory, we would be

0:36:10.920 --> 0:36:14.560
<v Speaker 1>able to observe them, you know, such as response to

0:36:14.600 --> 0:36:17.880
<v Speaker 1>overfishing of large males in response to changes in the

0:36:17.960 --> 0:36:21.640
<v Speaker 1>environment and so forth. Now there are individual species of

0:36:21.680 --> 0:36:26.000
<v Speaker 1>parrotfish where we might see some of those, like social triggers.

0:36:26.040 --> 0:36:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Perhaps I've seen discussion of the stop light parrotfish in

0:36:29.400 --> 0:36:34.440
<v Speaker 1>particular as perhaps being influenced by population density, growth and

0:36:34.560 --> 0:36:38.520
<v Speaker 1>mortality rates. So if terminal the idea here being that

0:36:38.600 --> 0:36:42.200
<v Speaker 1>it may be the case that terminal males in stop

0:36:42.280 --> 0:36:46.920
<v Speaker 1>light parrotfish populations, if they experience higher mortality rates so

0:36:46.960 --> 0:36:49.279
<v Speaker 1>more of them are dying, or if they are just

0:36:49.360 --> 0:36:55.160
<v Speaker 1>smaller overall sizes in the terminal males, then this change

0:36:55.200 --> 0:37:00.239
<v Speaker 1>may trigger earlier onset of the sex change in the

0:37:00.239 --> 0:37:04.520
<v Speaker 1>female parrotfish in that population. So, like I say, it's

0:37:04.560 --> 0:37:08.120
<v Speaker 1>still would line up with this idea that this evolved

0:37:08.200 --> 0:37:13.799
<v Speaker 1>because male parrotfish, large male parrotfish dominate reproduction. But it

0:37:13.800 --> 0:37:16.480
<v Speaker 1>would maybe be a slightly different case of like what

0:37:16.680 --> 0:37:20.720
<v Speaker 1>is actually causing it based on my understanding looking at

0:37:20.719 --> 0:37:23.520
<v Speaker 1>this documentation. But I like to say there's still I

0:37:23.520 --> 0:37:25.879
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of work going on here. Two thanks.

0:37:25.960 --> 0:37:29.239
<v Speaker 1>Keep in mind, though there is no evidence that any

0:37:29.280 --> 0:37:33.799
<v Speaker 1>species of parrotfish can undergo a sex change, reversal, or

0:37:33.880 --> 0:37:37.880
<v Speaker 1>a second sex change. Like it is, it is sequential,

0:37:38.480 --> 0:37:43.480
<v Speaker 1>sequential hermaphroditism. So it's female, then male. There are no

0:37:43.640 --> 0:37:46.239
<v Speaker 1>known cases where a male can then change back to

0:37:46.320 --> 0:37:49.160
<v Speaker 1>female do to you do to any kind of you know,

0:37:49.239 --> 0:37:52.760
<v Speaker 1>social pressure, environmental or what have you. It is female

0:37:52.760 --> 0:37:56.120
<v Speaker 1>and then male and again sequential hermaphroditism of one form

0:37:56.160 --> 0:37:57.560
<v Speaker 1>or another can be found in other fish. As I

0:37:57.600 --> 0:38:00.680
<v Speaker 1>mentioned the ras is. Apparently you see some version of

0:38:00.680 --> 0:38:05.759
<v Speaker 1>this in some molluscs and crustaceans. The size reproduction hypothesis

0:38:05.840 --> 0:38:09.200
<v Speaker 1>is widely e employed across the board, but I've also

0:38:09.239 --> 0:38:12.319
<v Speaker 1>seen I think the prevention of inbreeding being brought in

0:38:12.360 --> 0:38:15.279
<v Speaker 1>as another possible reason though I'm not sure if that

0:38:15.400 --> 0:38:19.319
<v Speaker 1>really pans out, particularly with the parrotfish. That may just

0:38:19.560 --> 0:38:24.760
<v Speaker 1>really have more to do with hermaphroditism as an evolutionary

0:38:25.120 --> 0:38:26.040
<v Speaker 1>trait in general.

0:38:26.520 --> 0:38:30.720
<v Speaker 3>But the sequential version you're saying, it seems that there's

0:38:30.760 --> 0:38:34.800
<v Speaker 3>a similar evolutionary explanation given across these different classes of animals,

0:38:34.840 --> 0:38:37.000
<v Speaker 3>which is that it likely has to do with a

0:38:37.080 --> 0:38:44.640
<v Speaker 3>relationship between the animal's size and its likelihood of successful reproduction, yes, exactly,

0:38:44.760 --> 0:38:49.480
<v Speaker 3>or specifically the size of males and successful reproduction, and

0:38:49.520 --> 0:38:51.280
<v Speaker 3>the fact that the animals just keep growing.

0:38:51.640 --> 0:38:55.120
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So it's fascinating. Yeah, this is like a factoid

0:38:55.120 --> 0:38:57.480
<v Speaker 1>about parrotfish that I'd long heard, but I'd never really

0:38:57.600 --> 0:39:00.000
<v Speaker 1>looked into it. I guess one of the problems is

0:39:00.040 --> 0:39:01.799
<v Speaker 1>when you're in the water, it's it's really hard to

0:39:01.840 --> 0:39:04.239
<v Speaker 1>research stuff. You're just like, oh, I'm gonna take your

0:39:04.239 --> 0:39:06.040
<v Speaker 1>word for it, and I'm I'm gonna look at it

0:39:06.960 --> 0:39:09.080
<v Speaker 1>and then I'll try to remember to read about it later.

0:39:18.960 --> 0:39:21.439
<v Speaker 3>Man, you would never guess that there is so much

0:39:21.440 --> 0:39:24.960
<v Speaker 3>interesting stuff about these fish just watching them scrape the rocks.

0:39:25.320 --> 0:39:28.360
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yeah, I mean just observing them, and I've observed

0:39:28.400 --> 0:39:29.799
<v Speaker 1>in plenty of times in the past. You know, it's

0:39:29.840 --> 0:39:31.400
<v Speaker 1>like you look at them and you're like, well, they're

0:39:31.400 --> 0:39:35.879
<v Speaker 1>a little bit goofy looking, they're beautifully colored, and then

0:39:35.920 --> 0:39:37.680
<v Speaker 1>you learn a little bit more about them, but there's still,

0:39:37.800 --> 0:39:40.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, greater depths of interest there. I guess that's

0:39:40.360 --> 0:39:42.919
<v Speaker 1>the that's the nature of most fish in the sea.

0:39:43.320 --> 0:39:44.400
<v Speaker 1>Never take them for granted.

0:39:44.680 --> 0:39:47.560
<v Speaker 3>In between recording these two episode parts, did you end

0:39:47.640 --> 0:39:51.320
<v Speaker 3>up googling more human parrot fish bites?

0:39:51.600 --> 0:39:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I did.

0:39:52.080 --> 0:39:54.080
<v Speaker 3>I don't know why I did. I shouldn't have.

0:39:54.320 --> 0:39:55.359
<v Speaker 1>Why would you do that?

0:39:55.560 --> 0:39:57.840
<v Speaker 3>I don't know. I regret it. I wish I hadn't

0:39:57.840 --> 0:39:58.799
<v Speaker 3>done it. I just did.

0:40:00.160 --> 0:40:02.160
<v Speaker 1>The only thing of that nature that I did run

0:40:02.160 --> 0:40:04.520
<v Speaker 1>across is when I was looking up pictures and looking

0:40:04.520 --> 0:40:09.400
<v Speaker 1>at articles about the big boys, the bumphead parrotfish is

0:40:09.400 --> 0:40:12.000
<v Speaker 1>there was an image of some coral with some big,

0:40:12.120 --> 0:40:15.280
<v Speaker 1>chunky bites taken out of it, and that was pretty impressive,

0:40:15.960 --> 0:40:17.960
<v Speaker 1>and it did cross my mind. It's like that I

0:40:18.000 --> 0:40:20.880
<v Speaker 1>would not want those bites taken out of my own flesh.

0:40:21.080 --> 0:40:23.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I would not want that to be my bones.

0:40:23.360 --> 0:40:24.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah.

0:40:24.520 --> 0:40:27.920
<v Speaker 3>But to emphasize yet again, as we did last time, parrotfisher.

0:40:28.520 --> 0:40:32.000
<v Speaker 3>There's no indication that they're very aggressive or looking to

0:40:32.040 --> 0:40:35.680
<v Speaker 3>bite humans that like, these stories come from people who

0:40:35.680 --> 0:40:38.240
<v Speaker 3>were getting up in the parrotfish's business.

0:40:38.200 --> 0:40:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Right, Yeah. I think I saw one account and this

0:40:42.120 --> 0:40:44.640
<v Speaker 1>is like, you know, this is I guess inherently unverified

0:40:45.360 --> 0:40:49.160
<v Speaker 1>of snorkelers or divers where someone was just sort of

0:40:49.880 --> 0:40:54.279
<v Speaker 1>casually bitten by a parrotfish. But in that thread, like

0:40:54.320 --> 0:40:56.759
<v Speaker 1>everyone was like, wow, that's weird. It's never happened to me.

0:40:56.960 --> 0:41:00.480
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know, you know, in the wild one

0:41:00.520 --> 0:41:04.320
<v Speaker 1>officer certainly possible. Who knows what that that parrotfish was

0:41:04.360 --> 0:41:05.120
<v Speaker 1>going through that day?

0:41:05.480 --> 0:41:08.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. I guess any species of any fish could in

0:41:08.440 --> 0:41:11.960
<v Speaker 3>some case be aggressive, but it's not like generally thought like,

0:41:12.000 --> 0:41:15.279
<v Speaker 3>oh wow, you gotta be careful, like they're they're coming for.

0:41:15.200 --> 0:41:17.799
<v Speaker 1>You, right, Yeah, I don't think they're they're coming for you.

0:41:17.920 --> 0:41:20.839
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I'm just because I'm imagining so like, you know,

0:41:20.920 --> 0:41:23.719
<v Speaker 3>the James Bond villain has a pool of piranhas that

0:41:23.760 --> 0:41:26.640
<v Speaker 3>he drops his henchman into when they make a mistake,

0:41:26.680 --> 0:41:29.160
<v Speaker 3>And I'm just thinking like, could they have gone with

0:41:29.200 --> 0:41:31.680
<v Speaker 3>a pool of parrotfish? How would that work out differently?

0:41:31.880 --> 0:41:35.320
<v Speaker 1>We have cotajo bodhi, mister bond with a fine layer

0:41:35.400 --> 0:41:39.879
<v Speaker 1>of algae in coral dust, you will now drop you

0:41:40.120 --> 0:41:43.400
<v Speaker 1>into that of parrotfish.

0:41:43.920 --> 0:41:48.640
<v Speaker 3>M No, not the bump edge. Okay, does that do

0:41:48.680 --> 0:41:49.640
<v Speaker 3>it for parrotfish?

0:41:49.719 --> 0:41:51.319
<v Speaker 1>I think it does. You know, they may have more

0:41:51.360 --> 0:41:53.480
<v Speaker 1>mysteries that we didn't explore, but I think we hit

0:41:53.760 --> 0:41:57.040
<v Speaker 1>all the really interesting stuff here. But hey, if you

0:41:57.200 --> 0:42:01.080
<v Speaker 1>know of other dimensions to the parrot fish or various

0:42:01.120 --> 0:42:04.200
<v Speaker 1>parrotfish species that we didn't talk about, write in because

0:42:04.239 --> 0:42:07.000
<v Speaker 1>we would love to hear from you. Just a reminder

0:42:07.120 --> 0:42:09.239
<v Speaker 1>that's Stuff to Blow your Mind Here is primarily a

0:42:09.280 --> 0:42:12.520
<v Speaker 1>science and culture podcast, with core episodes on Tuesdays and Thursdays,

0:42:12.840 --> 0:42:16.000
<v Speaker 1>listener mail on Mondays, short form episode on Wednesdays, and

0:42:16.040 --> 0:42:18.239
<v Speaker 1>on Fridays. We set aside most serious concerns to just

0:42:18.239 --> 0:42:20.759
<v Speaker 1>talk about a weird film on Weird House Cinema.

0:42:20.960 --> 0:42:24.760
<v Speaker 3>Huge thanks as always to our excellent audio producer JJ Posway.

0:42:25.080 --> 0:42:26.680
<v Speaker 3>If you would like to get in touch with us

0:42:26.719 --> 0:42:29.240
<v Speaker 3>with feedback on this episode or any other, to suggest

0:42:29.239 --> 0:42:31.480
<v Speaker 3>a topic for the future, or just to say hello,

0:42:31.760 --> 0:42:34.520
<v Speaker 3>you can email us at contact at stuff to Blow

0:42:34.520 --> 0:42:42.560
<v Speaker 3>your Mind dot com.

0:42:43.040 --> 0:42:46.000
<v Speaker 2>Stuff to Blow your Mind is production of iHeartRadio. For

0:42:46.080 --> 0:42:48.839
<v Speaker 2>more podcasts from my heart Radio, visit the iHeartRadio app,

0:42:49.000 --> 0:43:02.120
<v Speaker 2>Apple podcasts, or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.

0:43:02.280 --> 0:43:02.560
<v Speaker 3>West