WEBVTT - Surveillance: Auto Workers Losing For Decades Now, Alden Says

0:00:09.880 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. I'm Tom Keane jay Ley.

0:00:13.960 --> 0:00:16.960
<v Speaker 1>We bring you insight from the best in economics, finance,

0:00:17.040 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>investment and international relations. Find Bloomberg Surveillance on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg dot Com and of course on the Bloomberg. Now

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:29.760
<v Speaker 1>let's go straight to one of the newsmakers, of course,

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 1>one of the main key of newsmakers on this a

0:00:33.400 --> 0:00:36.879
<v Speaker 1>Democratic Unionist Party leader Earl Foster. Earlian Foster, thanks so

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:40.319
<v Speaker 1>much for joining Surveillance. What does the Prime Minister in

0:00:40.360 --> 0:00:43.320
<v Speaker 1>your eyes need to do to win your support in

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:46.520
<v Speaker 1>the House of Commons vote on Braxay. Well, good morning,

0:00:46.560 --> 0:00:49.080
<v Speaker 1>it's very good to be with you. Um. The deal

0:00:49.159 --> 0:00:51.680
<v Speaker 1>that has come forward from Europe but not a deal

0:00:51.920 --> 0:00:55.800
<v Speaker 1>that the Democratic Unions Party can support because it makes

0:00:56.040 --> 0:00:58.960
<v Speaker 1>a difference between Northern Ireland and the rest of the

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:02.160
<v Speaker 1>United Kingdom by the backstop that has been inserted in

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 1>the deal. There are many good parts in the deal,

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:08.319
<v Speaker 1>such as the recognition of European citizens rights um, the

0:01:08.360 --> 0:01:13.920
<v Speaker 1>fact that we future recognition of professional qualifications, but the backstop,

0:01:13.959 --> 0:01:17.120
<v Speaker 1>as far as we are concerned, cannot allow to support

0:01:17.160 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 1>this seal and therefore the backstop must go. Okay, but

0:01:20.840 --> 0:01:23.360
<v Speaker 1>there's a suggestion that the Prime Minister would agree to

0:01:23.520 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>a common rule book between the UK and the EU

0:01:27.080 --> 0:01:30.440
<v Speaker 1>are lean faster that might be enough to actually avoid

0:01:30.440 --> 0:01:33.320
<v Speaker 1>barriers between Northern Ireland and the rest of the UK.

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:37.319
<v Speaker 1>Would such a unilateral declaration be enough for you? We'll

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:40.160
<v Speaker 1>see the difficulty for us in Northern Irelanders that this

0:01:40.520 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 1>withdrawal agreement, if it's accepted by Parliament, and of course

0:01:43.520 --> 0:01:46.200
<v Speaker 1>there's no evidence that it will be accepted by Parliament,

0:01:46.560 --> 0:01:53.040
<v Speaker 1>would bring into place allegally buyinging international treaty which is

0:01:53.080 --> 0:01:55.200
<v Speaker 1>then in law and is there in black and white

0:01:55.440 --> 0:01:59.480
<v Speaker 1>and cannot be superseded. Our difficulty is that the political

0:01:59.520 --> 0:02:03.080
<v Speaker 1>victory that are being talked about our aspirational they are

0:02:03.160 --> 0:02:06.840
<v Speaker 1>not legally binding and therefore there is a real asymmetrical

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:11.400
<v Speaker 1>relationship between those two documents. Right, So I understand from

0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:13.720
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying or I'm inferring, and correct me if

0:02:13.720 --> 0:02:16.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm wrong, that a unilateral declaration would not be good

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:19.960
<v Speaker 1>enough for you. We want to hear what the Prime

0:02:19.960 --> 0:02:21.919
<v Speaker 1>Minister has to say, and we welcome her to this

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:24.480
<v Speaker 1>part of the unedited Kingdom, but we will be saying

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:26.480
<v Speaker 1>very clearly to her that she needs to get rid

0:02:26.520 --> 0:02:28.760
<v Speaker 1>of the back stub. You know, this is going to

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 1>be a waste of time today if he doesn't listen

0:02:31.240 --> 0:02:33.119
<v Speaker 1>to what people have to say to her. And as

0:02:33.160 --> 0:02:36.480
<v Speaker 1>far as I can see, this is not going through Parliament.

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:40.040
<v Speaker 1>And therefore, instead of wasting time over this next two

0:02:40.040 --> 0:02:43.560
<v Speaker 1>weeks going on a pr offensive around her deal, what

0:02:43.720 --> 0:02:45.480
<v Speaker 1>she should be doing is to try and find a

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:49.160
<v Speaker 1>third way forward, a deal that find support in Parliament

0:02:49.200 --> 0:02:52.080
<v Speaker 1>and a delible work. So we're saying to her, don't

0:02:52.120 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 1>waste the time, use that time profitably and trying to

0:02:55.160 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 1>find a better dat right. But the UK government is

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:00.600
<v Speaker 1>telling us that there's no point in real opening talks

0:03:00.680 --> 0:03:04.280
<v Speaker 1>because they want Budge on the backstop. Well, you know

0:03:04.360 --> 0:03:06.280
<v Speaker 1>they would say that wouldn't play. I mean, of course,

0:03:06.320 --> 0:03:08.360
<v Speaker 1>people are going to hold to their line until something

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:10.799
<v Speaker 1>else has to be done, um, and they believe that

0:03:10.919 --> 0:03:13.280
<v Speaker 1>this is the best way board. The Parliament is going

0:03:13.320 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>to tell her something very different. Okay, the DUP has

0:03:16.760 --> 0:03:21.359
<v Speaker 1>already abstained in important votes on government business. How likely

0:03:21.440 --> 0:03:26.600
<v Speaker 1>is that to continue? Well, the the deal, as I understand,

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:29.639
<v Speaker 1>it's coming to Parliament next week for debate and then

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:32.920
<v Speaker 1>we'll be voted on on the Tuesday, the eleventh of September.

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:36.800
<v Speaker 1>As it currently stands, we will not be supporting the

0:03:36.920 --> 0:03:40.000
<v Speaker 1>stale and not as the case for many across the Chamber,

0:03:40.040 --> 0:03:42.480
<v Speaker 1>whether they are remain voters or lead voters, they are

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:46.680
<v Speaker 1>not going to support the stale and therefore Prime Minister

0:03:46.800 --> 0:03:48.880
<v Speaker 1>is not going to get this steal through. So instead

0:03:48.920 --> 0:03:51.400
<v Speaker 1>of wasting her time, she should actually be trying to

0:03:51.440 --> 0:03:55.440
<v Speaker 1>find a way that is acceptible to everybody. Okay, I

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:59.080
<v Speaker 1>was talking to Nicki Morrigan at the Treasury Select Committee

0:03:59.280 --> 0:04:02.080
<v Speaker 1>yesterday and she are saying it's a chance that actually

0:04:02.200 --> 0:04:04.520
<v Speaker 1>we have a hard Brexit if this deal does not

0:04:04.680 --> 0:04:07.080
<v Speaker 1>get through. What do you think are is a probability

0:04:07.520 --> 0:04:11.120
<v Speaker 1>of a crashing out? Well, I think people are wanting

0:04:11.160 --> 0:04:13.840
<v Speaker 1>to portray this as a binary choice between this stale

0:04:13.880 --> 0:04:16.200
<v Speaker 1>and no deal, and of course the Prime Minister wants

0:04:16.200 --> 0:04:18.240
<v Speaker 1>to portray it is that because that's the best chances

0:04:18.279 --> 0:04:20.880
<v Speaker 1>are getting the deal through. We don't accept that that's

0:04:20.880 --> 0:04:23.039
<v Speaker 1>the case. If we say that there is a third way,

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:25.400
<v Speaker 1>a better way, a way that we'll get the support

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:28.640
<v Speaker 1>of the British people through their parliamentarium and we should

0:04:28.680 --> 0:04:31.440
<v Speaker 1>be looking for that way now instead of wasting time

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:34.679
<v Speaker 1>on the day that's not going to get support, Okay,

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:36.840
<v Speaker 1>Arlene Foster. A lot of people think that the DUP

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:39.039
<v Speaker 1>is bluffing, right, that you will end up, you know,

0:04:39.040 --> 0:04:42.599
<v Speaker 1>supporting this deal because you fear fresh elections and Jeremy

0:04:42.600 --> 0:04:45.000
<v Speaker 1>Corbyn coming in, or that you will support the deal

0:04:45.040 --> 0:04:49.600
<v Speaker 1>in exchange for more money. Are you bluffing? That's quite

0:04:49.600 --> 0:04:53.480
<v Speaker 1>offensive actually to say that we're going to uh not

0:04:53.640 --> 0:04:55.400
<v Speaker 1>vote again, that we're going to support the steal and

0:04:55.480 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 1>we were giving money for Northern Island of not what

0:04:57.680 --> 0:04:59.960
<v Speaker 1>this is about. This is about the future of Northern

0:05:00.000 --> 0:05:03.800
<v Speaker 1>in Ireland constitutionally and economically. Therefore, we will not be

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 1>supporting the deal in its current format. And by the way,

0:05:06.920 --> 0:05:09.039
<v Speaker 1>if it is voted down in Parliament, that does not

0:05:09.160 --> 0:05:11.960
<v Speaker 1>mean a general election, because what we have at the

0:05:12.000 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 1>moment is affect plim in Parliament back and it's only

0:05:14.640 --> 0:05:17.800
<v Speaker 1>in Parliament of votes for a general action that it's happened.

0:05:18.120 --> 0:05:20.839
<v Speaker 1>So that's a false thing to say, and it is

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 1>quite offensive to say that we're bluffing and that we're

0:05:23.680 --> 0:05:25.880
<v Speaker 1>only holy Night for money. Nothing could be further to

0:05:25.960 --> 0:05:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the truth. M Arlene Foster, how do you see it?

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:32.160
<v Speaker 1>So if you think that this deal will be voted down,

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:35.679
<v Speaker 1>does then the Prime Minister go back to the EU

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:37.839
<v Speaker 1>and get a better deal and then it gets through

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Parliament a second time? Or you know what happens after

0:05:41.160 --> 0:05:44.280
<v Speaker 1>December eleventh. Well, we would much prefer if she looked

0:05:44.279 --> 0:05:46.440
<v Speaker 1>for a better day now instead of within the next

0:05:46.440 --> 0:05:50.560
<v Speaker 1>two weeks. Our offenses. We think that would be much

0:05:50.600 --> 0:05:54.080
<v Speaker 1>better spent trying to find a better way forward getting

0:05:54.120 --> 0:05:56.200
<v Speaker 1>out of that Irish back stuff, because of course the

0:05:56.240 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 1>only reason the Irish back stuff is any we are

0:05:58.440 --> 0:06:01.440
<v Speaker 1>tooled is because to prevent a hard border on the

0:06:01.440 --> 0:06:04.239
<v Speaker 1>island of Ireland. But Leo Broadcal, the Irish pig monster,

0:06:04.360 --> 0:06:05.880
<v Speaker 1>has said he's not going to put up a hard

0:06:05.880 --> 0:06:08.600
<v Speaker 1>border Europe, so they're not pretty slow hard border. She's

0:06:08.680 --> 0:06:10.920
<v Speaker 1>very strange to know who's going to put this hard

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:13.520
<v Speaker 1>border up. I don't think I'd come to Ireland. Um,

0:06:13.600 --> 0:06:16.440
<v Speaker 1>so we have over hundreds of pages dealing with an

0:06:16.440 --> 0:06:20.159
<v Speaker 1>Arish back stop that Frank Day isn't needed. But have

0:06:20.240 --> 0:06:22.920
<v Speaker 1>you heard any indication from the government or Theresa A

0:06:23.080 --> 0:06:26.480
<v Speaker 1>that she is willing to go back to Brussels before

0:06:26.560 --> 0:06:30.599
<v Speaker 1>December eleven, then if not what happens on December twelve, No,

0:06:30.880 --> 0:06:34.120
<v Speaker 1>I haven't um and she is determined for Shade with

0:06:34.200 --> 0:06:36.360
<v Speaker 1>her deal. She believes that her day is the best

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:39.920
<v Speaker 1>way forward. But clearly she's not listening because Parliament. I

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>think that was very clear yesterday when she came at

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:45.440
<v Speaker 1>to the floor of the House of Common. But she

0:06:45.520 --> 0:06:50.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have the support to get this deal through. Arling Foster,

0:06:50.120 --> 0:06:53.279
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us for a very valuable conversation. She's,

0:06:53.279 --> 0:06:56.720
<v Speaker 1>of course Arlene Foster. She is a UK Democratic Unionist

0:06:56.839 --> 0:07:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Party leader. If you care about Lordstown, Ohio and the

0:07:02.320 --> 0:07:06.600
<v Speaker 1>other places where time will march on according to General Motors,

0:07:06.640 --> 0:07:10.400
<v Speaker 1>this is without question the interview of the day. Kevin

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Tynan is an auto guy. He is with Bloomberg Intelligence.

0:07:14.400 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>But John, what is so important about Kevin Tynan? As

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:21.760
<v Speaker 1>he understands that a Chrysler Slant six a Dodge Slant six.

0:07:21.800 --> 0:07:27.040
<v Speaker 1>If you drop the screw into the distributor cap area

0:07:27.080 --> 0:07:30.000
<v Speaker 1>where the spark plugs used to wire into you know

0:07:30.120 --> 0:07:33.400
<v Speaker 1>you will ruin your distributor and your father will not

0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:38.280
<v Speaker 1>bail you out in your car won't move until you

0:07:38.440 --> 0:07:40.360
<v Speaker 1>This would be a little bit of personal experience. Kevin,

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:44.040
<v Speaker 1>I have the clearest memory of walking along the chain

0:07:44.120 --> 0:07:48.600
<v Speaker 1>link fence of Rochester, Delco. In the early eighties when

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:53.440
<v Speaker 1>it vapored. Is that what's going to happen to these geographies? Uh,

0:07:53.480 --> 0:07:57.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's a distinct possibility that we go through

0:07:57.160 --> 0:08:00.880
<v Speaker 1>that kind of uh you know, Flint, Michion again and

0:08:00.880 --> 0:08:04.480
<v Speaker 1>and and Rochester. And But at the same time, I

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:07.680
<v Speaker 1>would say, you know this, this looks a lot like

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:11.560
<v Speaker 1>General Motors clearing the deck and saying, look this this

0:08:11.680 --> 0:08:15.680
<v Speaker 1>advanced into technology. We've kind of half effort in it.

0:08:15.960 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 1>So let's let's just let's draw this line here and

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:23.400
<v Speaker 1>say and and I think you see this by them

0:08:23.600 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 1>uh ceasing production of Chevrolet Vault with a V yet

0:08:27.800 --> 0:08:31.840
<v Speaker 1>continuing the bolt with a b um to say, look

0:08:31.840 --> 0:08:35.400
<v Speaker 1>that the plug in hybrid electric probably isn't the way

0:08:35.440 --> 0:08:37.560
<v Speaker 1>forward here. We have to go full commitment with the

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:40.839
<v Speaker 1>battery electric and still trucks obviously, right that's going to

0:08:40.920 --> 0:08:44.720
<v Speaker 1>pay the bill and give them the opportunity to innovative

0:08:45.440 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 1>or catch up on the e V side. Before John

0:08:47.720 --> 0:08:50.319
<v Speaker 1>jumps into the nuts and bolts of this no pun intended.

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 1>Kevin I had a good friend in Flint, Michigan in seventies.

0:08:53.559 --> 0:08:55.400
<v Speaker 1>He said, come on, you got to hear this. And

0:08:55.440 --> 0:08:58.320
<v Speaker 1>I remember sitting in a van hearing the rumble and

0:08:58.320 --> 0:09:01.920
<v Speaker 1>the roar. Is those wooden doors opened up out of

0:09:01.920 --> 0:09:04.760
<v Speaker 1>the nineteen thirties and forties and everybody ran across the

0:09:04.800 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 1>street to the bars. Those people weren't retrained. Then Ted

0:09:10.160 --> 0:09:14.240
<v Speaker 1>Alden told us some CFR this morning, we fail at retraining.

0:09:14.600 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Can we retrain these people? We can? And and I

0:09:18.200 --> 0:09:20.400
<v Speaker 1>was listening to that that piece, and and I think

0:09:20.400 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 1>it was right on the money. And I think that's

0:09:22.280 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 1>what becomes important here is that, uh, those factories are

0:09:27.520 --> 0:09:30.080
<v Speaker 1>now able to and and and again I think this

0:09:30.200 --> 0:09:32.520
<v Speaker 1>was one of or this is one of the sort

0:09:32.559 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 1>of uh, you know, points that I look at as

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the industry moves towards electric technology. Is you know, how

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 1>many automakers have committed plants to battery electric vehicles. We've

0:09:44.520 --> 0:09:47.040
<v Speaker 1>seen Volkswagen start to talk about it in Germany a

0:09:47.080 --> 0:09:50.360
<v Speaker 1>little bit. Now. I think this is General Motors opportunity

0:09:50.400 --> 0:09:53.719
<v Speaker 1>to say, where we're done with this half effort. We're

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 1>going all in on this. I'm not sure how big

0:09:56.559 --> 0:10:00.199
<v Speaker 1>that market is globally, but GM is saying, hey, if

0:10:00.200 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 1>that's ten percent of the global market, we want our share,

0:10:03.120 --> 0:10:05.959
<v Speaker 1>because it may be fift Like we see our friends

0:10:06.000 --> 0:10:08.120
<v Speaker 1>at benf talk about this is half the market is

0:10:08.160 --> 0:10:12.959
<v Speaker 1>electrification by UM And to Mary Barr's credit, I think

0:10:13.040 --> 0:10:16.640
<v Speaker 1>previous administrations at General Motors might have dismissed this as

0:10:17.040 --> 0:10:19.800
<v Speaker 1>money losing technology and we're not going to get involved,

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and maybe not even made the bolt in the first place.

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:24.800
<v Speaker 1>And I look at that as an engineering sort of

0:10:25.200 --> 0:10:28.560
<v Speaker 1>and and design experiment that says, Okay, now we have

0:10:28.640 --> 0:10:31.280
<v Speaker 1>this technology, let's just scale it up into other products

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:33.960
<v Speaker 1>that we can sell. So Kevin, for a lot of people,

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:37.640
<v Speaker 1>the last twenty four hours is really really significant, and

0:10:37.720 --> 0:10:40.720
<v Speaker 1>that essentially what GM has done has said that here

0:10:40.720 --> 0:10:43.640
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, if it's a sedan with an

0:10:43.640 --> 0:10:48.199
<v Speaker 1>internal combustion engine, it's just not worth making here anymore. Now,

0:10:48.200 --> 0:10:51.960
<v Speaker 1>if that's the conclusion, my next question will be who's next?

0:10:52.800 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 1>And how big? What is the scale of what's about

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:58.680
<v Speaker 1>to happen? What is it right? Well, and and look

0:10:59.360 --> 0:11:04.679
<v Speaker 1>Ford said this already, Uh Chrysler did it without you know,

0:11:04.760 --> 0:11:07.920
<v Speaker 1>being so vocal about it. But you know, uh, they've

0:11:07.960 --> 0:11:12.080
<v Speaker 1>gotten out of the car business. I mean they're truck now. Uh,

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:14.720
<v Speaker 1>just that LX platform is the only thing they have left.

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:18.200
<v Speaker 1>So the other two guys, General is actually laid on this.

0:11:18.640 --> 0:11:21.040
<v Speaker 1>And if you look at GM's numbers, look at an

0:11:21.040 --> 0:11:23.719
<v Speaker 1>eight percent drop on the car side in the full

0:11:23.800 --> 0:11:27.800
<v Speaker 1>year seventeen another this year. So I think the idea

0:11:27.840 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>is that, you know, do we lose money on these

0:11:29.920 --> 0:11:34.040
<v Speaker 1>products that are seeing dramatically declining demand or do we

0:11:34.080 --> 0:11:37.360
<v Speaker 1>lose money on the products that have this huge upside? Uh?

0:11:37.400 --> 0:11:40.120
<v Speaker 1>Potentially because now you have governments in China behind them

0:11:40.160 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 1>and Kevin, let me represent the president of the United

0:11:42.840 --> 0:11:48.080
<v Speaker 1>States everything you're saying, Cent and I know John and

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:50.160
<v Speaker 1>I are on the same page on this. So you

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:54.640
<v Speaker 1>gotta build something new. What is holding you back from

0:11:54.760 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 1>choosing a spot in Ohio to do it other than

0:11:59.720 --> 0:12:03.439
<v Speaker 1>the the the scale, right, I think I don't think

0:12:03.440 --> 0:12:06.199
<v Speaker 1>there there is any reason why you wouldn't choose that

0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:08.880
<v Speaker 1>spot to do it, other than you have a whole

0:12:08.920 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 1>lot of installed capacity and not a whole lot of

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:14.920
<v Speaker 1>demand for those products yet. Right, So that's one percent

0:12:14.960 --> 0:12:18.880
<v Speaker 1>of the global market, it's one percent of the US market. Um,

0:12:18.920 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, So so you're gonna take the Chevrolet Cruz

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:25.280
<v Speaker 1>for example, that's hundreds of thousands of units per year,

0:12:25.320 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 1>and you're gonna go in and you're gonna build tens

0:12:27.679 --> 0:12:30.880
<v Speaker 1>of thousands of electric deals. So it's certainly possible. It's

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:33.719
<v Speaker 1>just you're gonna have capacity utilization that's going to be

0:12:34.400 --> 0:12:36.920
<v Speaker 1>on the floor, Kevin, the repress releases that gets sent

0:12:37.000 --> 0:12:39.360
<v Speaker 1>to Wall Street. One of the last twenty four hours

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:42.400
<v Speaker 1>from GM was a press release for Wall Street. What's

0:12:42.440 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 1>the press release for the White House? What does the

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:47.840
<v Speaker 1>president say and what is the response of this company?

0:12:47.880 --> 0:12:49.920
<v Speaker 1>And I did not think I'd be asking that in

0:12:50.200 --> 0:12:52.680
<v Speaker 1>the home of capitalism, but I am what is the

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:54.600
<v Speaker 1>White House say back to this? And what is the

0:12:54.600 --> 0:12:58.120
<v Speaker 1>GM board and the c suite say back to them? Well,

0:12:58.160 --> 0:13:00.680
<v Speaker 1>and here's the interesting thing, Jonathan to and from my

0:13:00.760 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 1>perspective is that you know, when you look at the

0:13:04.040 --> 0:13:06.400
<v Speaker 1>White House, I think a lot of what you see

0:13:06.600 --> 0:13:11.720
<v Speaker 1>is this really dramatic, UH move to spark a response? Right,

0:13:11.760 --> 0:13:14.040
<v Speaker 1>If you want change, it's gonna have to be dramatic.

0:13:14.080 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 1>If we go softly through this, nothing ever happens. And

0:13:17.960 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm speaking in very general terms, and I think that's

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:23.959
<v Speaker 1>general motors move here is to say, look, we need

0:13:24.040 --> 0:13:25.840
<v Speaker 1>to be here in the future, we need to be

0:13:25.920 --> 0:13:28.120
<v Speaker 1>growing in the future, and for us to do that,

0:13:28.400 --> 0:13:30.839
<v Speaker 1>we have to draw this line right here, right now

0:13:31.200 --> 0:13:35.079
<v Speaker 1>and make this transition. Is it painful, absolutely, But if

0:13:35.120 --> 0:13:37.840
<v Speaker 1>we're going to exist and be relevant in the future,

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:39.679
<v Speaker 1>we have to do this now. Is this just a

0:13:39.800 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 1>labor arbitrage? I'm talking like Steve Roach of Yale University.

0:13:43.080 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Union used to make a hundred fifty thousand

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:48.760
<v Speaker 1>year overtime, a hundred thirty whatever it was, and then

0:13:48.800 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 1>Steve Rattner came in, as cars are and we remodeled labor.

0:13:51.920 --> 0:13:53.720
<v Speaker 1>I get it. I don't know what they make now, Kevin,

0:13:53.760 --> 0:13:56.199
<v Speaker 1>please tell me. But is it just still a labor

0:13:56.280 --> 0:14:00.080
<v Speaker 1>arbitrage where the American auto worker makes too much for

0:14:00.160 --> 0:14:03.200
<v Speaker 1>GM to make money on that next suv or pickup truck.

0:14:03.800 --> 0:14:06.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so. But but look at pricing in

0:14:06.120 --> 0:14:09.960
<v Speaker 1>the industry. Right We talked about transaction prices being at

0:14:10.640 --> 0:14:14.360
<v Speaker 1>record highs. But if you look at the technology UM

0:14:14.400 --> 0:14:18.320
<v Speaker 1>and everything, not only in vehicle but in terms of production,

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:22.200
<v Speaker 1>it's expensive to manufacture UM, you know. And then if

0:14:22.240 --> 0:14:24.720
<v Speaker 1>you look at declining volumes, it makes it it makes

0:14:24.720 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 1>the equation that much more on balanced. So UM, you know,

0:14:28.520 --> 0:14:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't think it's just the labor arbitrage.

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:35.600
<v Speaker 1>There's cost inflation all across the board there and you

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 1>have to adjust for it. Um. At the same time,

0:14:39.040 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 1>you know there there's pushed back against moving to lower

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:45.600
<v Speaker 1>costs to Mexico without production there, and to say, look,

0:14:45.600 --> 0:14:48.640
<v Speaker 1>we we want this ten percent adjusted EBIT margin. The

0:14:48.680 --> 0:14:50.840
<v Speaker 1>only way we're gonna do it is if that part

0:14:50.880 --> 0:14:53.480
<v Speaker 1>of them, that component of the of the cost structure

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:56.240
<v Speaker 1>isn't as low as it can be. Hey, Kevin grant To,

0:14:56.280 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 1>can't sell you really really smart. Thank you so much

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:01.880
<v Speaker 1>for dropping buying giving us a kill. Kevin Sainen, Bloomberg

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Intelligent Senior Automotive Analysis as GM announces some big job

0:15:07.200 --> 0:15:13.000
<v Speaker 1>cuts and some big factory closures as well from the

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Interactive Broker Studios, John Farrell and Tom Keene, thank

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:20.040
<v Speaker 1>you for being with us. And now a definitive conversation

0:15:20.160 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 1>on trade. Edward Alden wrote one of my books of

0:15:23.000 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the summer, Failure to Adjust. It is a deceptively wonderful, narrow,

0:15:28.680 --> 0:15:32.520
<v Speaker 1>dense treatise on trade and what America needs to do.

0:15:32.600 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's get an update at Alden. What does President Trump

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:40.240
<v Speaker 1>and what does America need to do on trade right now? Oh?

0:15:40.320 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 1>Now that is that is a big question. I mean,

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:46.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, I I think the immediate challenge is to

0:15:46.920 --> 0:15:49.640
<v Speaker 1>find some way to enter into serious negotiations with China.

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, we are on potentially a very destructive road

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:55.320
<v Speaker 1>with China. That's not to say there are real problems

0:15:55.360 --> 0:15:57.880
<v Speaker 1>in China. There are serious problems, but we need to

0:15:57.880 --> 0:15:59.600
<v Speaker 1>find a way forward on it. And I mean the

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:01.960
<v Speaker 1>posit it. A thing with Trump is they were able

0:16:01.960 --> 0:16:04.120
<v Speaker 1>to do a new NAFTA deal. There was a lot

0:16:04.160 --> 0:16:05.920
<v Speaker 1>of storm and drawing, but at the end of the

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:08.080
<v Speaker 1>day they came out of with the deal. I hope

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:10.120
<v Speaker 1>the same thing as possible with China. And then we've

0:16:10.160 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 1>really got to focus on what's going on here in

0:16:11.880 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 1>the United States and how to boost our economic competitiveness

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 1>in a whole range of ways that we're just not

0:16:16.840 --> 0:16:20.920
<v Speaker 1>doing at the moment. Did the jobs GM Did they

0:16:21.000 --> 0:16:24.120
<v Speaker 1>go to China? As the John Prine, the Great John

0:16:24.160 --> 0:16:28.080
<v Speaker 1>Prine of Chicago would say, the jobs went to Mexico.

0:16:30.160 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean yes and no, I mean no in the

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 1>sense that that you know, GM is not gonna be

0:16:35.040 --> 0:16:38.160
<v Speaker 1>exporting it certainly anytimes in your future cars from China

0:16:38.200 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 1>to the United States. It's not a Mexico type relationship.

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:44.200
<v Speaker 1>But China is obviously a much bigger future market for

0:16:44.280 --> 0:16:47.000
<v Speaker 1>GM right now than the United States is. And GM

0:16:47.080 --> 0:16:49.600
<v Speaker 1>is rationalizing in various ways in North America. They're not

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:52.680
<v Speaker 1>going to build these lower margin products in the United

0:16:52.680 --> 0:16:55.720
<v Speaker 1>States or Canada anymore. They're going to focus on next

0:16:55.800 --> 0:16:58.560
<v Speaker 1>generation vehicles. All that makes a lot of economic sense,

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't create a whole lot of jobs for

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:04.280
<v Speaker 1>for auto workers. And and and that's been the story

0:17:04.280 --> 0:17:05.879
<v Speaker 1>for a long time. And nothing that the President is

0:17:05.960 --> 0:17:09.480
<v Speaker 1>under anybody else's done has changed that underlying economic reality. Said.

0:17:09.480 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 1>There was a really interesting gonticle in the Washington Post

0:17:12.240 --> 0:17:15.359
<v Speaker 1>yesterday following the GM layoffs that was titled GM layoffs

0:17:15.480 --> 0:17:18.919
<v Speaker 1>or another victory for capital over labor? What do you

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:23.520
<v Speaker 1>think about that line? Said? You know, I think again,

0:17:23.600 --> 0:17:28.479
<v Speaker 1>for better worse, that is true. I mean, you know, labor,

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:31.680
<v Speaker 1>even even the auto workers who have done better than

0:17:31.720 --> 0:17:35.440
<v Speaker 1>most labor unions, have been losing for for decades now.

0:17:36.160 --> 0:17:40.800
<v Speaker 1>The the owners, you know, the folks who run GM

0:17:40.840 --> 0:17:43.959
<v Speaker 1>and other companies, have a lot of flexibility. They can

0:17:44.000 --> 0:17:46.320
<v Speaker 1>produce anywhere they want in the world. They can decide

0:17:46.359 --> 0:17:49.639
<v Speaker 1>to replace labor with technology, and at the end of

0:17:49.640 --> 0:17:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the day, there's not a whole lot the unions can

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:54.040
<v Speaker 1>do to stand in the way of that. So I

0:17:54.080 --> 0:17:56.520
<v Speaker 1>think this is the latest chapter in a very long story.

0:17:56.560 --> 0:17:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I think that analysis is correct. Whether White House stands

0:17:59.040 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 1>out head the lines of to come ready blood. Is

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:03.520
<v Speaker 1>this the White House for labor or for capital? Which

0:18:03.560 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 1>one is it? That's a that is a really good question.

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 1>It wants to be the White House for both. So

0:18:10.240 --> 0:18:12.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, if you look at the new NAFTA, there

0:18:12.280 --> 0:18:14.400
<v Speaker 1>are a bunch of provisions in there that organized labor

0:18:14.480 --> 0:18:17.520
<v Speaker 1>is pretty happy with. I mean, unlike the Transpacific Partnership. Uh,

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the f l c i O is holding its fire

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:21.439
<v Speaker 1>on this agreement, saying, you know, the unions might be

0:18:21.480 --> 0:18:24.280
<v Speaker 1>able to support it. But at the same time, obviously,

0:18:24.520 --> 0:18:26.200
<v Speaker 1>so White has done a lot for capital, you know,

0:18:26.280 --> 0:18:29.439
<v Speaker 1>particular at the big corporate packs cut that was signed

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:32.760
<v Speaker 1>by the President in December, and the presidents obviously very

0:18:32.800 --> 0:18:36.640
<v Speaker 1>concerned about Wall Street. So so so far it's trying

0:18:36.680 --> 0:18:38.920
<v Speaker 1>to be both. Um, there may come a point in

0:18:38.960 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 1>which it has to make a decision. This, Uh, the

0:18:41.480 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 1>GM example is a good one. President is obviously upset

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:46.440
<v Speaker 1>about this. He's upset about these factors closing. Whether he's

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:48.600
<v Speaker 1>going to do anything real to try to put pressure

0:18:48.600 --> 0:18:50.920
<v Speaker 1>on GM, I kind of doubt it. Okay, Well, what's

0:18:50.920 --> 0:18:57.680
<v Speaker 1>he do'ssure? Uh? You know, I mean, I suppose one

0:18:57.760 --> 0:19:00.000
<v Speaker 1>source of pressure is these auto tariffs that everybody is

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:03.440
<v Speaker 1>talking about. I mean, this investigation on whether the US

0:19:03.520 --> 0:19:07.399
<v Speaker 1>can can block auto imports on national security grounds is

0:19:07.400 --> 0:19:09.679
<v Speaker 1>going to be delivered no later than February. And I

0:19:09.760 --> 0:19:12.600
<v Speaker 1>suppose if you know, the United States puts in place

0:19:13.440 --> 0:19:16.880
<v Speaker 1>steep carafs on auto imports, particularly from Europe and Korea

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:22.000
<v Speaker 1>in Japan, that could put some pressure on companies to

0:19:22.040 --> 0:19:24.439
<v Speaker 1>expand production here in the United States just to serve

0:19:25.000 --> 0:19:27.440
<v Speaker 1>this market, even though it isn't the fast growing market.

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that would obviously be a very drastic step,

0:19:30.520 --> 0:19:33.520
<v Speaker 1>but in the short run might actually bring some auto

0:19:33.600 --> 0:19:36.360
<v Speaker 1>jobs back to the US. Ted Alton, thank you so much,

0:19:36.359 --> 0:19:40.760
<v Speaker 1>greatly appreciate it. Failure to adjust just a wonderful thought

0:19:40.800 --> 0:19:45.320
<v Speaker 1>provoking book. A trade with the counts on Foreign Relations,

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Edward Alden, particularly for our American audience, and to be

0:19:50.560 --> 0:19:54.159
<v Speaker 1>honest for myself as well. We need to triangulate. We

0:19:54.240 --> 0:19:57.720
<v Speaker 1>need to do that on Russia and on Ukraine. And

0:19:57.760 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 1>there's no better person to triangulate with that Andrew Woods.

0:20:01.840 --> 0:20:04.639
<v Speaker 1>Sir Andrew is of course the former British Ambassador to

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:08.840
<v Speaker 1>Yugoslavia and then served a substantial five years as British

0:20:08.840 --> 0:20:14.119
<v Speaker 1>Ambassador to Russia and is with Chatham House, London Surrender.

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:16.199
<v Speaker 1>We are thrilled to have you with us today. It

0:20:16.320 --> 0:20:20.320
<v Speaker 1>is nine and twenty miles from Belgrade to Kiev. It's

0:20:20.359 --> 0:20:24.520
<v Speaker 1>fourteen hundred miles from Belgrade used Yugoslavia up to Moscow.

0:20:25.119 --> 0:20:28.639
<v Speaker 1>And I bring up this triangulation because so many people

0:20:28.680 --> 0:20:32.280
<v Speaker 1>say that Ukraine is a gateway to Europe. How do

0:20:32.320 --> 0:20:38.480
<v Speaker 1>you translate that? How is Ukraine a gateway to Europe? Well,

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:42.320
<v Speaker 1>in the sense that it's her an oil and gas transit,

0:20:42.440 --> 0:20:46.400
<v Speaker 1>her company country brother in the sense that it's got

0:20:46.520 --> 0:20:53.040
<v Speaker 1>very strong roots in Russian culture, and therefore, in principle,

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:58.240
<v Speaker 1>those two countries should be in effective communication, which they

0:20:58.280 --> 0:21:01.919
<v Speaker 1>absolutely not. They're not right now. And I believe martial

0:21:01.960 --> 0:21:05.320
<v Speaker 1>law enforce in Ukraine or or or soon. But so

0:21:05.440 --> 0:21:09.960
<v Speaker 1>much of this to use Joseph Nay is power and interdependence.

0:21:10.520 --> 0:21:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Is this just about the power of Russia versus the

0:21:13.880 --> 0:21:20.400
<v Speaker 1>power of Ukraine? Or can they find a common ground? Well,

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:23.879
<v Speaker 1>they could, um, but that would really be up to Russia.

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:26.639
<v Speaker 1>I think we ought to be. In general, it's the

0:21:26.720 --> 0:21:32.080
<v Speaker 1>Russians who are trying their best to stop Ukraine becoming

0:21:32.119 --> 0:21:36.600
<v Speaker 1>an independent country able to make its own uh Norse

0:21:36.680 --> 0:21:40.600
<v Speaker 1>and pursue its own interests, because they believe they have

0:21:40.680 --> 0:21:49.280
<v Speaker 1>an innate right two make Ukraine there. John John Mersheimer

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 1>of Chicago, out with a new book, has been heated

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 1>in Notorious about saying that the US and the West

0:21:57.359 --> 0:22:01.320
<v Speaker 1>extended too far east towards Russia. Shah, did we do

0:22:01.400 --> 0:22:05.119
<v Speaker 1>that with Ukraine? As John Musheimer onto something, that we

0:22:05.280 --> 0:22:11.159
<v Speaker 1>extended too far to the adjacent geographies of Russia. I

0:22:11.160 --> 0:22:12.879
<v Speaker 1>don't agree at all, but of course that is what

0:22:12.920 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 1>the Russians themselves would say, because they regard the West

0:22:16.080 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 1>as a threat. UM. If he's talking about the extension

0:22:21.040 --> 0:22:24.240
<v Speaker 1>of NATO in the last century, which is essentially a

0:22:24.240 --> 0:22:27.760
<v Speaker 1>space what he has in mind, then one shouldn't forget

0:22:28.119 --> 0:22:31.800
<v Speaker 1>the um the fact that the country that did join

0:22:31.880 --> 0:22:35.119
<v Speaker 1>NATO or wanted to, precisely because they were afraid and

0:22:35.240 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 1>what Russia might do, and precisely because Russia was in

0:22:38.000 --> 0:22:41.639
<v Speaker 1>a state of quite considerable confusion at the end of

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:46.760
<v Speaker 1>Gorbachev and through through the beginning of the Elsin. Is

0:22:46.840 --> 0:22:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Russia in confusion now? It doesn't seem to be. It

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:53.280
<v Speaker 1>seems to have a plan. Are they in confusion or

0:22:53.320 --> 0:22:58.480
<v Speaker 1>what is the Putin plan? I think for the things

0:22:58.520 --> 0:23:02.000
<v Speaker 1>that the inhabitants of Russia would care about, he doesn't

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 1>have a plan at all. That is, the economy is

0:23:04.920 --> 0:23:10.960
<v Speaker 1>not doing well. He's not attending to their needs in health, education, infrastructure,

0:23:10.960 --> 0:23:13.120
<v Speaker 1>and so on and so forth. He's spending a lot

0:23:13.119 --> 0:23:18.800
<v Speaker 1>of money, however, on military expenditure, precisely because he believes

0:23:19.000 --> 0:23:22.920
<v Speaker 1>that is necessary to establish Russia as a quote great

0:23:23.000 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 1>power unquote. I think this will end in a much

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:33.719
<v Speaker 1>poorer Russia and one which will become most unstable as

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:35.840
<v Speaker 1>the years go ahead. If you're just joining us, Sir

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:38.679
<v Speaker 1>Anderwood with us, he's a former British Ambassador to Russia

0:23:39.119 --> 0:23:43.280
<v Speaker 1>and also before that British ambassador to Yugoslavia with Chatham House.

0:23:43.600 --> 0:23:46.760
<v Speaker 1>I guess there's been sanctions. One sanction, d I can

0:23:46.800 --> 0:23:50.560
<v Speaker 1>go French and you, Sir Andrew, sanctions TOI. Are we

0:23:50.560 --> 0:23:54.439
<v Speaker 1>going to get another set of sanctions here as a

0:23:54.480 --> 0:23:58.840
<v Speaker 1>result of this, this immediate incident, Yes, um, I wouldn't

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:01.399
<v Speaker 1>think so. What we are going to get is it

0:24:01.880 --> 0:24:05.680
<v Speaker 1>to be much more difficult for Putin to persuade other

0:24:05.720 --> 0:24:11.200
<v Speaker 1>countries two uh to lift sanctions which he badly needs

0:24:12.000 --> 0:24:13.640
<v Speaker 1>in that in that sense Athing going to be back

0:24:13.680 --> 0:24:16.160
<v Speaker 1>in his face. But it does depend on what he

0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:20.520
<v Speaker 1>really wishes to make of this, what his purpose was

0:24:20.800 --> 0:24:25.800
<v Speaker 1>in in doing it. It was only in September that

0:24:25.880 --> 0:24:30.680
<v Speaker 1>similar Ukrainian ships passed through the Kirch straight, as they

0:24:30.680 --> 0:24:33.920
<v Speaker 1>have every right to do under an agreement between Ukraine

0:24:33.960 --> 0:24:38.120
<v Speaker 1>and Russia, that this is their common territory of waters,

0:24:39.080 --> 0:24:44.320
<v Speaker 1>and his reference to Russian frontiers and rights is, by

0:24:44.320 --> 0:24:47.080
<v Speaker 1>implication at least a claim to his control of the

0:24:47.119 --> 0:24:50.960
<v Speaker 1>whole of the as of Sea, Sir Andrew. My colleague

0:24:51.000 --> 0:24:54.439
<v Speaker 1>Pim Fox points out that within the Brexit battle you

0:24:54.600 --> 0:24:57.720
<v Speaker 1>have a Gibraltar in view. I think a lot of

0:24:57.760 --> 0:25:03.040
<v Speaker 1>Americans understand where Gibraltar is in the Mediterranean. Gibraltar is

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:07.400
<v Speaker 1>not Scotland. It's not Ireland or Northern Ireland. It's Gibraltar.

0:25:07.840 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 1>Can Gibraltar in the smaller geographies of the United Kingdom,

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:18.760
<v Speaker 1>can they play a real part in this immediate Brexit debate? Well, yes,

0:25:19.320 --> 0:25:21.119
<v Speaker 1>I should declare an interest because I was born in

0:25:21.200 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Gibraltar and spent much of my boyhood there, so I

0:25:24.359 --> 0:25:30.320
<v Speaker 1>have an interest. Um. Actually, Gibraltar has been in British

0:25:30.400 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 1>or English hands for considering longer than it ever was

0:25:33.720 --> 0:25:39.000
<v Speaker 1>in Spanish. Secondly, it's been an important base to your

0:25:39.000 --> 0:25:43.640
<v Speaker 1>country and mine and others during wartime, so I think

0:25:43.640 --> 0:25:47.879
<v Speaker 1>it is a memory of loyalty from us to it

0:25:48.040 --> 0:25:51.120
<v Speaker 1>in that sense. There's also the fact that the last

0:25:51.160 --> 0:25:55.159
<v Speaker 1>time the population of Gibraltar were consulted about whether they

0:25:55.200 --> 0:25:58.520
<v Speaker 1>wished or did not wish to have a co dominion

0:25:58.560 --> 0:26:04.680
<v Speaker 1>with Spain, now to nine percent of the voted YEA. Well,

0:26:04.760 --> 0:26:07.199
<v Speaker 1>within this debate of Braxit, and I'm going to ask you,

0:26:07.240 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 1>I guess a more general question with your esteem work

0:26:10.600 --> 0:26:14.320
<v Speaker 1>and diplomacy, what is the diplomacy the Prime Minister needs

0:26:14.359 --> 0:26:18.399
<v Speaker 1>now to assist Tories to some form of decision and

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 1>may maybe drag your labor party into the decision as well.

0:26:22.600 --> 0:26:26.399
<v Speaker 1>You served under Tony Blair and uh and John major

0:26:26.640 --> 0:26:29.520
<v Speaker 1>is as well. There has to come to a conclusion

0:26:29.600 --> 0:26:34.160
<v Speaker 1>here what would diplomacy is necessary right now for your

0:26:34.280 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 1>United Kingdom. Well, uh, the Brexit problem is a problem

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:46.480
<v Speaker 1>which has shared with other countries still in the European Union.

0:26:47.720 --> 0:26:53.840
<v Speaker 1>It's a clash between the Wish buoyed up by the

0:26:53.920 --> 0:26:59.159
<v Speaker 1>creation of the Euro as a currency to increase the

0:26:59.200 --> 0:27:03.960
<v Speaker 1>amount of centralized control in Brussels with the help of

0:27:04.080 --> 0:27:08.280
<v Speaker 1>the cir called Franco German Motor. A lot of countries

0:27:08.320 --> 0:27:11.879
<v Speaker 1>have found the pressure of that on them to change

0:27:11.880 --> 0:27:15.520
<v Speaker 1>their policies here and mostly in economic terms that there

0:27:15.560 --> 0:27:22.879
<v Speaker 1>are policies considerable and we are now as we're facing that.

0:27:24.440 --> 0:27:29.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how the Parliament will vote on the

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:33.760
<v Speaker 1>arrangement that our prime ministers negotiated, but the chances are

0:27:33.760 --> 0:27:38.720
<v Speaker 1>pretty highly they're going to refuse it. After that we

0:27:38.880 --> 0:27:40.919
<v Speaker 1>will be back at square one in one way, but

0:27:41.040 --> 0:27:43.240
<v Speaker 1>in another week we should be faced with a difficult

0:27:43.320 --> 0:27:47.840
<v Speaker 1>choice depending how the EU reacts exactly, Sir Andward, thank

0:27:47.880 --> 0:27:49.720
<v Speaker 1>you so much. We have to leave it there this morning.

0:27:49.800 --> 0:27:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Greatly appreciated the former British Ambassador to Russia, Sir Andrew Wood,

0:27:55.240 --> 0:27:59.440
<v Speaker 1>thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Surveillance Podcast. Subscribe and

0:27:59.480 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 1>listen to interviews on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, or whichever podcast

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:09.119
<v Speaker 1>platform you prefer. I'm on Twitter at Tom Keene before

0:28:09.119 --> 0:28:12.960
<v Speaker 1>the podcast. You can always catch us worldwide. I'm Bloomberg

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:13.359
<v Speaker 1>Radio