WEBVTT - Rates, Trump, Banks, CPI, and Consumers

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney, alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:05.280
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller.

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 2>Every business day, we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 2>and Bloomberg experts, along with essential market moving news.

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:17.279
<v Speaker 1>Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast on Apple Podcasts or wherever

0:00:17.400 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you listen to podcasts, and at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast.

0:00:20.960 --> 0:00:23.320
<v Speaker 1>All right, so we had the CPI print today pretty

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:26.200
<v Speaker 1>much I think what most people were looking for. Certainly consensus,

0:00:26.840 --> 0:00:29.479
<v Speaker 1>certainly gives some more credence to the argument that the

0:00:29.520 --> 0:00:32.040
<v Speaker 1>Fed can pause if it wants to. Let's check in

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:34.760
<v Speaker 1>with somebody who pays close attention to this stuff, Ira Jersey,

0:00:35.040 --> 0:00:38.920
<v Speaker 1>chief US interest rate strategist for Bloomberg Intelligence. So, Ira,

0:00:39.040 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>what's your takeaway from the inflation print we saw today?

0:00:42.040 --> 0:00:45.320
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, obviously, you've know, you guys have talked about it

0:00:45.560 --> 0:00:48.440
<v Speaker 3>at nauseum here a little bit. Pretty much as expected.

0:00:50.280 --> 0:00:52.839
<v Speaker 3>It doesn't really leave a whole lot of doubt as

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:56.080
<v Speaker 3>to what's going to happen tomorrow. I think that, you know,

0:00:56.320 --> 0:00:58.400
<v Speaker 3>if we had seen something where you get a point

0:00:58.440 --> 0:01:01.200
<v Speaker 3>five or a point six print on uh on on

0:01:01.280 --> 0:01:04.120
<v Speaker 3>the core numbers, then maybe the Fed would would hike tomorrow,

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:06.559
<v Speaker 3>but they've signaled that they're probably going to skip tomorrow's meeting.

0:01:06.959 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 3>I think the bigger the bigger thing that today's data

0:01:11.000 --> 0:01:13.440
<v Speaker 3>does for us is really leaves in doubt what then

0:01:13.520 --> 0:01:15.319
<v Speaker 3>is going to happen in July, so that you know,

0:01:15.360 --> 0:01:18.640
<v Speaker 3>the market was pricing for a near certainty that they

0:01:18.640 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 3>were going to skip June and then hike in July.

0:01:20.959 --> 0:01:23.600
<v Speaker 3>But now you know, I think that we have to

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:27.640
<v Speaker 3>reassess that uh, that the certainty that the Fed is

0:01:27.680 --> 0:01:30.000
<v Speaker 3>going to go in UH in July, and the market

0:01:30.040 --> 0:01:32.160
<v Speaker 3>started to kind of move away at least a little

0:01:32.160 --> 0:01:34.399
<v Speaker 3>bit from that possibility at this point.

0:01:34.760 --> 0:01:37.119
<v Speaker 4>So irauld talk to us about when we're looking at

0:01:37.120 --> 0:01:40.119
<v Speaker 4>this speculation that's happening in the bond market and how

0:01:40.160 --> 0:01:42.440
<v Speaker 4>it's at a record when you are looking at treasury

0:01:42.520 --> 0:01:45.320
<v Speaker 4>features ahead of the FED meeting, break it down as

0:01:45.400 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 4>far as what is happening with the positioning there.

0:01:48.120 --> 0:01:50.559
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, there's a lot of so so there's record short

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:54.680
<v Speaker 3>positioning by speculators and UH in the treasury market basically

0:01:54.720 --> 0:01:57.320
<v Speaker 3>everyone short duration. So the so the fact that you

0:01:57.360 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 3>actually have a little bit of a selloff going on

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:01.960
<v Speaker 3>right here right now is a little bit surprising, But

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:04.880
<v Speaker 3>typically what happens is that you know, this positioning data

0:02:04.920 --> 0:02:07.720
<v Speaker 3>doesn't necessarily give you a lot of information about what

0:02:07.800 --> 0:02:10.600
<v Speaker 3>direction the market's going to go. You know that the

0:02:10.639 --> 0:02:13.920
<v Speaker 3>fact that people are very short just means in particular

0:02:14.000 --> 0:02:16.239
<v Speaker 3>that as the market sells off that you could see

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:18.240
<v Speaker 3>some short covering, and that it just gets harder and

0:02:18.320 --> 0:02:22.600
<v Speaker 3>harder for moves in the direction that the future's positioning is.

0:02:23.160 --> 0:02:25.600
<v Speaker 3>But we have to keep in mind too that that

0:02:25.919 --> 0:02:28.800
<v Speaker 3>these some of this positioning in a way could be

0:02:28.800 --> 0:02:32.400
<v Speaker 3>a hedge to another risk that some of these levered

0:02:32.440 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 3>investors that that are primarily short have on. So for example,

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 3>if their long corporate bonds, for example, they could be

0:02:38.800 --> 0:02:42.120
<v Speaker 3>short some treasuries as and and treasury futures as kind

0:02:42.120 --> 0:02:44.359
<v Speaker 3>of a hedge to that. Or could be that they're

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:48.400
<v Speaker 3>short equities or long equities rather and you know short

0:02:48.480 --> 0:02:51.359
<v Speaker 3>rates as well. You know that that's possible too. So

0:02:51.360 --> 0:02:53.800
<v Speaker 3>so it's a little bit hard to discern with this

0:02:53.919 --> 0:02:58.400
<v Speaker 3>future's positioning exactly what's going on with the overall strength

0:02:58.440 --> 0:02:59.880
<v Speaker 3>of the market. But I do think that it means

0:03:00.080 --> 0:03:02.640
<v Speaker 3>it's going to get harder and harder to for the

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:05.400
<v Speaker 3>market to sell off on as dramatically as it has,

0:03:05.880 --> 0:03:07.560
<v Speaker 3>and you could wind up seeing on a rally, You

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:09.800
<v Speaker 3>could wind up seeing massive rallies because a lot of

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:11.600
<v Speaker 3>these shorts could get covered very quickly.

0:03:13.680 --> 0:03:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Shorting US treasures isn't that kind of un American? How

0:03:16.560 --> 0:03:21.399
<v Speaker 1>often does that happen? I mean, what who does that?

0:03:21.680 --> 0:03:24.560
<v Speaker 3>There's been been a lot of people short treasuries, you know,

0:03:24.639 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 3>for the better part of you know, two years now, really,

0:03:27.639 --> 0:03:30.240
<v Speaker 3>you know, just and you know part of part of

0:03:30.240 --> 0:03:32.240
<v Speaker 3>the reason is that when interest rates are going up,

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:34.200
<v Speaker 3>you don't want to be long, right, and you know,

0:03:34.200 --> 0:03:36.760
<v Speaker 3>there's there's ways to make money. And if you look

0:03:36.760 --> 0:03:41.120
<v Speaker 3>at that, even though you know, the Bloomberg Treasury Index

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:44.080
<v Speaker 3>has been had record losses over the last eighteen months,

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:48.080
<v Speaker 3>even worse than nineteen seventies and eighties, even though interest

0:03:48.160 --> 0:03:50.640
<v Speaker 3>rates have went up way more back then, right back

0:03:50.720 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 3>during the you know, nineteen seventy eight to nineteen eighty one,

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:55.920
<v Speaker 3>you actually had interest rates go up ten percent, right,

0:03:55.920 --> 0:03:57.440
<v Speaker 3>and we've only seen interest rates go up you know,

0:03:57.440 --> 0:04:01.240
<v Speaker 3>four and a half five percent now here. But there's

0:04:01.320 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 3>some bond math involved, because the relationship between the price

0:04:05.520 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 3>of a bond and the yield and yield moves is

0:04:08.160 --> 0:04:10.400
<v Speaker 3>much much higher now, so you get a little move

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:14.520
<v Speaker 3>in in a yield of a bond, and it's more

0:04:14.560 --> 0:04:16.960
<v Speaker 3>in dollar price today than it was back in the

0:04:17.040 --> 0:04:21.720
<v Speaker 3>nineteen nineteen seventies and eighties. So even though we've had

0:04:21.800 --> 0:04:24.920
<v Speaker 3>these massive losses, a lot of people have outperformed. So

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 3>when you look at active managers in bond funds, both

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:32.400
<v Speaker 3>bond mutual funds and actively managed ETFs, you actually see

0:04:32.440 --> 0:04:35.800
<v Speaker 3>significant outperformance compared to disease. Even though you now have

0:04:35.920 --> 0:04:39.280
<v Speaker 3>some people you know, still moving to passive. Within the

0:04:39.320 --> 0:04:44.880
<v Speaker 3>ETF world, the active managers have have done very well

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:49.680
<v Speaker 3>by being short treasuries or underweight treasury securities in their portfolios.

0:04:49.880 --> 0:04:52.279
<v Speaker 4>Hey, Ira, I've had some traders talk to me about

0:04:52.320 --> 0:04:55.280
<v Speaker 4>how whenever they're shorting treasuries, especially if you're looking at

0:04:55.279 --> 0:04:57.359
<v Speaker 4>the tenure, it was more of the expectations that yield

0:04:57.360 --> 0:05:00.560
<v Speaker 4>to move higher, but then the caveat being so extreme

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:03.480
<v Speaker 4>position may have the counter effect and then end up

0:05:03.680 --> 0:05:06.440
<v Speaker 4>having to push yield lower. Do you think that's plausible?

0:05:07.279 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 3>Well, I think it has more to do with the

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:12.200
<v Speaker 3>volatility and in the directionality of the market. So, like

0:05:12.240 --> 0:05:15.040
<v Speaker 3>I mentioned, if if people weren't as short as they

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:17.520
<v Speaker 3>are now with things like treasury futures, we might have

0:05:17.600 --> 0:05:21.400
<v Speaker 3>seen even even a bigger sell off today than we've

0:05:21.440 --> 0:05:24.240
<v Speaker 3>seen so far. You know, ten years yields, you know,

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:27.560
<v Speaker 3>higher by five ish basis points on the day. But

0:05:27.920 --> 0:05:29.520
<v Speaker 3>I think it's when you go the other way and

0:05:29.520 --> 0:05:31.799
<v Speaker 3>you get that short covering that you wind up really

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:35.080
<v Speaker 3>seeing like position squaring and uh and and you know

0:05:35.400 --> 0:05:37.599
<v Speaker 3>what would be you think would be a five base

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:39.440
<v Speaker 3>point move can turn into a ten or twelve basis

0:05:39.440 --> 0:05:41.560
<v Speaker 3>point move in a hurry. And we've seen quite a

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:44.279
<v Speaker 3>lot of that over the over the last couple of years,

0:05:44.800 --> 0:05:47.000
<v Speaker 3>where you get this these extreme positioning and then you

0:05:47.080 --> 0:05:50.919
<v Speaker 3>get this massive snapbacks as as the market kind of

0:05:50.920 --> 0:05:55.200
<v Speaker 3>recalibrates their their thinking and and you know, again like

0:05:55.360 --> 0:05:57.359
<v Speaker 3>if if you know, I think a big part of

0:05:57.400 --> 0:05:59.520
<v Speaker 3>the reason why you see some of the short base

0:05:59.560 --> 0:06:02.680
<v Speaker 3>and in things like duration is I do suspect that

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:04.800
<v Speaker 3>there's a lot of people who are in interest rates steepeners.

0:06:04.839 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 5>Now.

0:06:05.000 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 3>People were in flattening trades for a very long time

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:09.720
<v Speaker 3>where they were long say ten years or thirty year

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 3>securities and then they were short twos and fives. I

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:15.760
<v Speaker 3>think I think that's starting to flip as we get

0:06:15.800 --> 0:06:18.280
<v Speaker 3>toward the end of the fed's hiking cycle, because the

0:06:18.320 --> 0:06:20.400
<v Speaker 3>next move, and I do concur with this, the next

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:23.320
<v Speaker 3>move is likely to be a very significant steepening of

0:06:23.320 --> 0:06:26.119
<v Speaker 3>the yield or un inversion of the yield curve at least,

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 3>so you wind up with an environment where people are

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:31.920
<v Speaker 3>going to be buying two year, three year, five year

0:06:31.960 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 3>notes and then want to be short or or underweight

0:06:35.720 --> 0:06:37.599
<v Speaker 3>ten year and thirty year securities.

0:06:38.120 --> 0:06:40.599
<v Speaker 1>Hira, what would surprise you tomorrow from FED Chairman jpal

0:06:40.800 --> 0:06:41.919
<v Speaker 1>As comments, I.

0:06:41.960 --> 0:06:44.920
<v Speaker 3>Think if he's I think if he's extremely hawkish, would

0:06:44.960 --> 0:06:47.920
<v Speaker 3>would surprise me, you know, given some of the some

0:06:47.960 --> 0:06:50.200
<v Speaker 3>of the data that we've received. Yes, the employment data

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:53.159
<v Speaker 3>was pretty solid, but a lot of the other data

0:06:53.200 --> 0:06:55.960
<v Speaker 3>that we've seen everywhere, from some sales data as well

0:06:55.960 --> 0:06:59.360
<v Speaker 3>as some of the ism surveys and the leading economic

0:06:59.360 --> 0:07:02.040
<v Speaker 3>indicator something all been pretty poor and actually are very

0:07:02.040 --> 0:07:05.120
<v Speaker 3>close to recessionary type levels. So so so I think

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:08.480
<v Speaker 3>if he was very hawkish tomorrow, that would be a surprise,

0:07:08.560 --> 0:07:10.800
<v Speaker 3>certainly if he was more hawkish than he was last month.

0:07:10.920 --> 0:07:14.000
<v Speaker 3>So I'm looking very closely at our at at at

0:07:14.040 --> 0:07:18.040
<v Speaker 3>our FED sentiment indicator. So after he after J. Powell

0:07:18.200 --> 0:07:21.000
<v Speaker 3>gives his opening remarks from the press conference, you know

0:07:21.040 --> 0:07:25.160
<v Speaker 3>we're going to run our natural language processing model and yeah,

0:07:25.160 --> 0:07:25.640
<v Speaker 3>you know take a.

0:07:25.600 --> 0:07:29.239
<v Speaker 1>Look as known as your juniors, Well.

0:07:29.200 --> 0:07:30.200
<v Speaker 3>Our data science team will.

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I know we've got one of those MBA.

0:07:33.000 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 4>How much fun was it to see Ira last week

0:07:34.800 --> 0:07:36.960
<v Speaker 4>and the suspenders with the soccer all over?

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:37.680
<v Speaker 6>Great?

0:07:38.160 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 1>He comes out of his cam every once in a while,

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:42.080
<v Speaker 1>so we would be appreciate that, Ira Jersey, thanks so much.

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:45.320
<v Speaker 1>I he covers all the interest rate strategy work for

0:07:45.520 --> 0:07:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence. I got a whole team, uh doing that

0:07:48.880 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 1>kind of stuff, and they've got some serious models. He's

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:54.640
<v Speaker 1>got a model that kind of covers on a day

0:07:54.680 --> 0:07:57.320
<v Speaker 1>to day basis the receipts and the spending of the

0:07:57.360 --> 0:07:59.880
<v Speaker 1>US government. Amazing, Like I don't even have that for myself.

0:08:00.080 --> 0:08:03.440
<v Speaker 1>He's got it for the entire US government. So we

0:08:03.560 --> 0:08:05.960
<v Speaker 1>knows when and if the US can afford to pay

0:08:06.000 --> 0:08:07.440
<v Speaker 1>their bill. So keep an eye on that.

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:12.120
<v Speaker 5>You're listening to the team Ken's are Live program Bloomberg

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:14.520
<v Speaker 5>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern.

0:08:14.240 --> 0:08:17.280
<v Speaker 7>On Bloomberg dot com, the iHeartRadio.

0:08:16.560 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 5>App and the Bloomberg Business app or listen on demand

0:08:19.360 --> 0:08:21.080
<v Speaker 5>wherever you get your podcasts.

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:25.560
<v Speaker 1>Jess Matt and Paul Sweeney Here in the Bloomberg Interactive

0:08:25.560 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Brokers studio, Boy attention is going to be this afternoon

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:32.360
<v Speaker 1>down in Miami, Florida, where President Trump will be arranged. Yeah,

0:08:32.400 --> 0:08:34.280
<v Speaker 1>we want to get the kind of a roundtable this

0:08:34.320 --> 0:08:36.200
<v Speaker 1>discussion here and kind of catch it from a couple

0:08:36.200 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 1>of different angles. So we welcome Wendy Schuler Brown University professor.

0:08:40.320 --> 0:08:43.840
<v Speaker 1>She joins us here, as does Kaylee Lines. She joins us.

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:45.839
<v Speaker 1>She is in Miami at the courthouse. Of course, she

0:08:45.920 --> 0:08:49.719
<v Speaker 1>covers the White House for Bloomberg Television. We appreciate her

0:08:49.800 --> 0:08:52.080
<v Speaker 1>time on a busy, busy day. Wendy, let's start with you.

0:08:53.320 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it doesn't happen every day that former president

0:08:56.920 --> 0:08:59.600
<v Speaker 1>gets arraigned on federal charges.

0:08:59.640 --> 0:08:59.760
<v Speaker 6>Here.

0:09:00.000 --> 0:09:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Do you expect this to mean for President Trump and

0:09:03.200 --> 0:09:05.959
<v Speaker 1>potentially another run for the presidency?

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:09.320
<v Speaker 8>Well, good morning. In the short term, it's it's good

0:09:09.320 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 8>for Donald Trump with his base and donations. They expect

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:15.600
<v Speaker 8>they're holding a fundraiser, I believe, even this evening, and

0:09:15.640 --> 0:09:18.920
<v Speaker 8>they expect to raise a lot of money off this

0:09:19.800 --> 0:09:22.640
<v Speaker 8>and really continue to keep his name in the news.

0:09:22.720 --> 0:09:25.680
<v Speaker 8>I mean, there is no publicity that Donald Trump doesn't like,

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 8>and so I think in the short run, you know,

0:09:29.840 --> 0:09:31.880
<v Speaker 8>he'll benefit in some way from this, But in the

0:09:31.920 --> 0:09:35.360
<v Speaker 8>longer run, it's just another or an additional liability to

0:09:35.360 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 8>his candidacy, particularly the broader Republican Party, and I don't

0:09:39.280 --> 0:09:41.200
<v Speaker 8>see where it does him any favors with the key

0:09:41.280 --> 0:09:43.800
<v Speaker 8>independent voters he'd need to win the general. But even

0:09:44.080 --> 0:09:47.200
<v Speaker 8>in state primaries across the country, you can register and

0:09:47.280 --> 0:09:50.200
<v Speaker 8>change your party registration from independent to Republican. So the

0:09:50.200 --> 0:09:54.240
<v Speaker 8>independents wanted to shape the Republican nomination process. They can

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:57.040
<v Speaker 8>do that and haven't been big fans of the president

0:09:57.080 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 8>in recent the former president in recent elections. So that's

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:02.040
<v Speaker 8>it's a liability. I think that's sort of deep and

0:10:02.080 --> 0:10:04.440
<v Speaker 8>persistent for Donald Trump's longer term prospects.

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:07.240
<v Speaker 4>Kaylee, I want to bring you into this conversation set

0:10:07.280 --> 0:10:09.480
<v Speaker 4>the scene for us. What are things shaping up heading

0:10:09.480 --> 0:10:10.439
<v Speaker 4>into this afternoon.

0:10:11.520 --> 0:10:14.040
<v Speaker 9>Well, I'm at the outside the courthouse right now, and

0:10:14.120 --> 0:10:16.960
<v Speaker 9>there are dozens and dozens of media tents like the

0:10:17.000 --> 0:10:19.319
<v Speaker 9>one I am in for Bluebert. There is a very

0:10:19.400 --> 0:10:22.160
<v Speaker 9>high police presence, but there isn't yet at this point.

0:10:22.280 --> 0:10:24.520
<v Speaker 9>It seems to be a lot of protesters, but they

0:10:24.559 --> 0:10:27.920
<v Speaker 9>are prepared for potentially a lot to be here over

0:10:27.920 --> 0:10:30.000
<v Speaker 9>the course of today. The Miami Police Chief is that

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:32.640
<v Speaker 9>it could be anywhere between five thousand and fifty thousand

0:10:32.679 --> 0:10:35.640
<v Speaker 9>supporters of President Trump who show out today, as he

0:10:35.720 --> 0:10:38.000
<v Speaker 9>had calls on them to do. He of course had

0:10:38.000 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 9>posted on true social over the weekend, I'll see you

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:43.160
<v Speaker 9>in Miami on Tuesday. He had in an interview with

0:10:43.240 --> 0:10:45.480
<v Speaker 9>Roger Stone on radio over the weekend as well, so

0:10:45.600 --> 0:10:47.920
<v Speaker 9>that people need to come out and keep fully protest.

0:10:48.000 --> 0:10:49.560
<v Speaker 9>So we'll be on watch for that. And of course

0:10:49.559 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 9>it's at three pm Eastern time, so about four and

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 9>a half hours from now. I think, if my math

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:57.840
<v Speaker 9>is right, that the President will be showing up here,

0:10:57.920 --> 0:10:59.760
<v Speaker 9>although we may not see him. He may enter under

0:10:59.760 --> 0:11:02.280
<v Speaker 9>grown to be arraigned on these federal charges.

0:11:03.160 --> 0:11:06.040
<v Speaker 1>What, Wendy, what do you make of some of the

0:11:06.440 --> 0:11:08.720
<v Speaker 1>I guess responses we've had from members of Congress. Some

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>have come out and supporting the president pretty wholeheartedly, and

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:16.720
<v Speaker 1>some have not supported him. Some have been, like cenatored Romney,

0:11:16.720 --> 0:11:19.680
<v Speaker 1>been critical here. How do you expect this to play out.

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 8>Well, they're sort of dancing around it, right, They wanted

0:11:22.920 --> 0:11:25.959
<v Speaker 8>to can't alienate the Trump base, either whether you're currently

0:11:25.960 --> 0:11:28.160
<v Speaker 8>holding office and running or president you're just currently holding

0:11:28.200 --> 0:11:30.640
<v Speaker 8>office trying to get reelected, if you're a House member

0:11:30.640 --> 0:11:33.360
<v Speaker 8>in particular in twenty four, you're dancing around it. On

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:36.560
<v Speaker 8>the other hand, you see that they're sort of trying

0:11:36.640 --> 0:11:40.720
<v Speaker 8>not to talk about the severity of the classification level

0:11:40.760 --> 0:11:44.320
<v Speaker 8>of the documents that were badly handled. So these are

0:11:44.400 --> 0:11:47.760
<v Speaker 8>really highly sensitive national security documents, and it gets to

0:11:47.800 --> 0:11:49.760
<v Speaker 8>the point of do you want this man in charge

0:11:49.800 --> 0:11:53.240
<v Speaker 8>of our national security? And then it's a legitimate point

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:55.920
<v Speaker 8>and question to ask. People will get confused about the

0:11:56.000 --> 0:11:59.080
<v Speaker 8>number of indictments and the scope of authority, but at

0:11:59.080 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 8>the end of the day, he's got, you know, military

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:05.120
<v Speaker 8>plans and nuclear secrets lying around the ballroom. You know,

0:12:05.200 --> 0:12:07.440
<v Speaker 8>that does not say I'm going to be responsible with

0:12:07.559 --> 0:12:09.800
<v Speaker 8>national security. And the Republicans want to keep the edge

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:12.640
<v Speaker 8>that they think they have on national security. So there

0:12:12.679 --> 0:12:14.800
<v Speaker 8>does come a point, except for maybe through Jim Jordan

0:12:14.840 --> 0:12:18.280
<v Speaker 8>of Ohio, where you say, I can't really defend compromising

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:22.080
<v Speaker 8>our national security from my own re election prospects.

0:12:22.480 --> 0:12:25.680
<v Speaker 4>Kayleie, how has the Biden administration responded so far?

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:30.000
<v Speaker 9>Well, they really haven't at all. The President has really

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:32.679
<v Speaker 9>tried to keep him his distance from this. When he's

0:12:32.679 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 9>been asked about that, he has set no comment on

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:37.760
<v Speaker 9>the indictment because, of course, one of the narratives that

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:41.679
<v Speaker 9>President former President Trump as well as Republicans have been

0:12:41.679 --> 0:12:44.360
<v Speaker 9>pushing is that this is politically motivated, that this is

0:12:44.360 --> 0:12:47.760
<v Speaker 9>a weaponization of the Justice Department. President Trump has said

0:12:47.760 --> 0:12:51.319
<v Speaker 9>that this is a corrupt Biden administration election interference at

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:53.840
<v Speaker 9>the highest level. So to this point, President Biden has

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:56.040
<v Speaker 9>tried to stay far away from this, let the Justice

0:12:56.040 --> 0:12:59.800
<v Speaker 9>Department do its work, and not really try to be

0:12:59.840 --> 0:13:00.719
<v Speaker 9>involved in this.

0:13:01.160 --> 0:13:04.920
<v Speaker 1>In any way, Kaylee Done in Miami, is there an

0:13:05.080 --> 0:13:08.360
<v Speaker 1>expectation that the president will be public here? Will there

0:13:08.360 --> 0:13:10.440
<v Speaker 1>be a public I'm not going to say a purp walk,

0:13:10.440 --> 0:13:13.720
<v Speaker 1>but will there be some public appearance by the president today?

0:13:13.800 --> 0:13:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Is part of this process? Do we know?

0:13:17.120 --> 0:13:20.160
<v Speaker 9>It really could go either way. The expectation though, is

0:13:20.240 --> 0:13:23.640
<v Speaker 9>that he will not be walking through the usual lobby

0:13:23.679 --> 0:13:25.560
<v Speaker 9>of this courthouse, that he's going to enter be an

0:13:25.600 --> 0:13:28.960
<v Speaker 9>underground garage and then head into the courthouse, so we

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:32.280
<v Speaker 9>may not actually see him here physically. Where we will

0:13:32.320 --> 0:13:35.000
<v Speaker 9>see the president is after he finishes these proceedings in

0:13:35.000 --> 0:13:38.080
<v Speaker 9>Miami today. He's going to get back on his private plane,

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:40.560
<v Speaker 9>fly from Miami back up to Bedminster in New Jersey,

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 9>and speak at his golf club there this evening at

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:45.720
<v Speaker 9>eight fifteen pm Eastern time, and bold a donor event

0:13:45.720 --> 0:13:48.440
<v Speaker 9>as Wendy talks about his campaign is hoping celebrates two

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:51.880
<v Speaker 9>million dollars at that event tonight, just hours after he

0:13:52.000 --> 0:13:55.440
<v Speaker 9>made history by being arraigned on federal criminal charges. This

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:58.120
<v Speaker 9>is something we have never seen happen before, but it

0:13:58.120 --> 0:14:01.200
<v Speaker 9>could have the same effect as the indictments previously in

0:14:01.280 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 9>Manhattan earlier this year, that what it really accomplishes is

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:08.880
<v Speaker 9>galvanizing his base and ultimately being away for him to thundering.

0:14:09.080 --> 0:14:11.800
<v Speaker 4>Wendy, what's the timetable here that we're talking about when

0:14:11.840 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 4>it comes to a potential indictment obviously like this, As

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:16.840
<v Speaker 4>far as how long this could drag out for.

0:14:17.559 --> 0:14:20.000
<v Speaker 8>Well, that's a great question just because it gets to

0:14:20.280 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 8>the judge, right, this is the judge that appointed a

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:25.120
<v Speaker 8>special master, you know, to sort of go over what

0:14:25.120 --> 0:14:26.960
<v Speaker 8>the Justice barman had done. In terms of the raid

0:14:27.160 --> 0:14:29.720
<v Speaker 8>the documents. You know, this judge got chastised for the

0:14:29.760 --> 0:14:32.320
<v Speaker 8>way she handled this case before by her you know,

0:14:32.360 --> 0:14:35.240
<v Speaker 8>sort of higher level judges on a panel. The question is,

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:37.720
<v Speaker 8>you know, does she go buy the book here or

0:14:37.760 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 8>does she compromise the case in some way and does

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:42.600
<v Speaker 8>she have to be removed from the case. I mean,

0:14:42.600 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 8>there's still a question mark about whether she actually ends

0:14:44.880 --> 0:14:47.520
<v Speaker 8>up being the presiding judge. You know, you've got setting

0:14:47.600 --> 0:14:49.960
<v Speaker 8>trial dates, you've got jury selection. You you know, these

0:14:50.000 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 8>trials and I mean multiple trials to the former president

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:56.560
<v Speaker 8>will go, we'll move on, and you know they'll take

0:14:56.600 --> 0:14:59.000
<v Speaker 8>a long time. They'll drag out, which was good good

0:14:59.000 --> 0:15:01.600
<v Speaker 8>for Trump in terms of his ability. As Kelly's you know,

0:15:01.680 --> 0:15:05.840
<v Speaker 8>absolutely rightly suggesting, but there's a weariness, particularly among core voters,

0:15:05.880 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 8>and as I said, mechanically in the primaries next year,

0:15:09.000 --> 0:15:10.640
<v Speaker 8>you can have a lot of people who aren't core

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 8>Trump's supporters actually sign up to vote in the Republican primary.

0:15:14.440 --> 0:15:16.640
<v Speaker 8>Since Biden, if he's the nominee, you know, as he

0:15:16.680 --> 0:15:19.080
<v Speaker 8>stays healthy and all that stuff that we talk about,

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 8>there's not gonna be much of a contest on the

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:23.280
<v Speaker 8>Democratic side. So You're going to see some shifting of

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:25.320
<v Speaker 8>voters in that primary and this, I think this will

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:27.600
<v Speaker 8>become a liability, particularly if he gets a lot of

0:15:27.640 --> 0:15:31.320
<v Speaker 8>really rowdy, slash violent people to protest this. That just

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:33.440
<v Speaker 8>reminds people of January sixth, and I don't think that

0:15:33.480 --> 0:15:35.680
<v Speaker 8>does anybody good on the Republican side.

0:15:35.440 --> 0:15:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Wendy, If I'm running for the Republican nomination, how do

0:15:38.520 --> 0:15:41.680
<v Speaker 1>I play this thing that Trump has been in ditona

0:15:42.480 --> 0:15:43.320
<v Speaker 1>of federal crimes?

0:15:44.160 --> 0:15:47.680
<v Speaker 8>You know, you play it by basically trying and especially

0:15:47.720 --> 0:15:51.000
<v Speaker 8>in digital advertising on social media platforms, to saying, look,

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:54.960
<v Speaker 8>I support everything this guy you know did, I'm loyal,

0:15:55.400 --> 0:15:58.440
<v Speaker 8>but he's not the guy anymore. It's too chaotic, it's

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:01.520
<v Speaker 8>too disruptive, you can't usin with national security. Try to

0:16:01.520 --> 0:16:03.880
<v Speaker 8>get that one in and just really, if they can

0:16:03.920 --> 0:16:07.040
<v Speaker 8>get the kind of big money, you know, blanket the

0:16:07.200 --> 0:16:09.880
<v Speaker 8>Republican party base in the next couple of months saying

0:16:09.960 --> 0:16:13.760
<v Speaker 8>I am really the better alternative and try to sort

0:16:13.800 --> 0:16:16.680
<v Speaker 8>of erode that thirty four to thirty five percent base

0:16:16.720 --> 0:16:18.720
<v Speaker 8>that we think he has in the Republican primary voting

0:16:18.760 --> 0:16:22.160
<v Speaker 8>electorate and steal nine to fifteen percent of that voting

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:26.040
<v Speaker 8>populist elsewhere, and I think that needs to be The

0:16:26.080 --> 0:16:29.000
<v Speaker 8>strategy is the slow and steady, but it needs to

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:31.840
<v Speaker 8>happen now, and it needs to say, you know, I'm

0:16:31.840 --> 0:16:34.880
<v Speaker 8>the better alternative. You can still like this guy, but

0:16:35.080 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 8>vote for me if you really want to win in

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:37.520
<v Speaker 8>twenty twenty four.

0:16:37.800 --> 0:16:40.440
<v Speaker 4>Hey, kayleie, we only have about a minute left. How

0:16:40.480 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 4>does this impact other potential cases that Trump is having

0:16:43.440 --> 0:16:45.280
<v Speaker 4>to deal with as well?

0:16:45.440 --> 0:16:47.400
<v Speaker 9>Well, that's a really good question, because of course this

0:16:47.480 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 9>isn't the first time that he has been arranged or

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 9>case criminal charges that already happened in New York. But

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:55.360
<v Speaker 9>this also may not be the only indictment we see

0:16:55.400 --> 0:16:58.440
<v Speaker 9>stemming from investigations by Special Counsel Jacksmith. He is also

0:16:58.560 --> 0:17:02.360
<v Speaker 9>investigating Trump's role in January sixth. There is a district

0:17:02.400 --> 0:17:04.920
<v Speaker 9>attorney in County Georgia that is also looking at his

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:07.439
<v Speaker 9>attempts to overturn the results of the twenty twenty election.

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 9>So this doesn't necessarily mean the end of Trump's legal woes,

0:17:11.359 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 9>and potentially related to January sixth, we could actually see

0:17:14.040 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 9>even more serious charges than the one he's facing here.

0:17:16.480 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 9>And I have to apologize if you hear this rooster.

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:18.760
<v Speaker 4>Guys.

0:17:18.800 --> 0:17:22.119
<v Speaker 9>I know you've been talking about there are literally wild

0:17:22.200 --> 0:17:25.040
<v Speaker 9>chickens and roosters walking around the courthouse right now.

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:27.680
<v Speaker 1>All right, we'll leave that to you. You're in charge

0:17:27.680 --> 0:17:30.640
<v Speaker 1>of that down there. Bloomberg TD anchor Kaylee Lines definitely

0:17:30.640 --> 0:17:32.639
<v Speaker 1>on location down in Miami with the chickens in the

0:17:32.680 --> 0:17:36.800
<v Speaker 1>Hends and Wendy Schiller Brown University, a professor joining us

0:17:36.840 --> 0:17:39.439
<v Speaker 1>to get some just some smart analysis of how this

0:17:39.480 --> 0:17:42.160
<v Speaker 1>is all going to play out down in Miami today

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:45.720
<v Speaker 1>and what it might mean for President former President Trump

0:17:45.760 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 1>gung Ford, particularly as we prepare for the twenty twenty

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:51.440
<v Speaker 1>four election. A lot of moving pieces there.

0:17:51.680 --> 0:17:55.320
<v Speaker 5>You're listening to the tape Cancher Live program Bloomberg Markets

0:17:55.359 --> 0:17:59.080
<v Speaker 5>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, Tune in up,

0:17:59.160 --> 0:18:02.040
<v Speaker 5>Bloomberg dot Com and the Bloomberg Business App. You can

0:18:02.080 --> 0:18:05.320
<v Speaker 5>also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New

0:18:05.359 --> 0:18:10.800
<v Speaker 5>York station, Just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:13.440
<v Speaker 1>Bes min and Paul Swaite here in the Bloomberg Interactive

0:18:13.440 --> 0:18:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Broker Studio. Our Inflation Day, Today's CPI Day Today. Here's

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:20.479
<v Speaker 1>a kind of the headline stuff on an annualized basis CPI.

0:18:21.040 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 1>The headline print four percent. That's kind of right in

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:26.080
<v Speaker 1>line with a four point one percent expectation, but it's

0:18:26.160 --> 0:18:28.000
<v Speaker 1>down big from last month when it was four point

0:18:28.080 --> 0:18:28.480
<v Speaker 1>nine percent.

0:18:28.760 --> 0:18:31.479
<v Speaker 4>Eight was talking about those egg prices and the index

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:34.360
<v Speaker 4>for eggs falling close to fourteen percent, the largest decrease

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:36.920
<v Speaker 4>in that index since January nineteenth, big one of that

0:18:37.000 --> 0:18:37.640
<v Speaker 4>CPI report.

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm a big expedited guy. So that's that's chickens

0:18:41.080 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 1>outside the courthouse. Chickens outside of the court house with

0:18:44.040 --> 0:18:45.560
<v Speaker 1>Kaylee Lines, she's in charge.

0:18:46.080 --> 0:18:46.359
<v Speaker 10>All right.

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Let's so they seem pretty good to me. But let's

0:18:48.080 --> 0:18:49.440
<v Speaker 1>go to somebody who does this stuff for a living.

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:52.159
<v Speaker 1>Jeffrey Cleveland. He's a director and chief e commerce that

0:18:52.200 --> 0:18:55.160
<v Speaker 1>paid it in regal So, Jeff, you know, the print

0:18:55.200 --> 0:18:58.040
<v Speaker 1>seemed good to me. What's your takeaway from our inflation

0:18:58.040 --> 0:18:59.359
<v Speaker 1>out local here in the United States?

0:19:00.080 --> 0:19:02.159
<v Speaker 11>Well, I'm self interested. So when I look at the

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:05.520
<v Speaker 11>index for food away from home, it's up eight point

0:19:05.600 --> 0:19:07.560
<v Speaker 11>three percent in the last twelve months.

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so that's you.

0:19:09.520 --> 0:19:12.080
<v Speaker 11>Know, dining now, that's it's too much for me. Food

0:19:12.119 --> 0:19:14.960
<v Speaker 11>at home is up six percent year on year and

0:19:15.040 --> 0:19:17.480
<v Speaker 11>I think if I remember correctly, I flipped through the

0:19:17.520 --> 0:19:21.159
<v Speaker 11>report for the LA area, So the La Metro area

0:19:21.640 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 11>headline CPI was up point seven percent month to month.

0:19:24.800 --> 0:19:27.560
<v Speaker 11>So I'm not seeing this slow down in prices that

0:19:27.600 --> 0:19:28.640
<v Speaker 11>everyone is so cheerful.

0:19:28.680 --> 0:19:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Well, your problem out there, Jeff's gasoline price is what

0:19:31.600 --> 0:19:34.120
<v Speaker 1>are you guys doing out there? I mean it's it's

0:19:34.240 --> 0:19:35.800
<v Speaker 1>all your taxes also.

0:19:35.680 --> 0:19:39.360
<v Speaker 4>Use vehicle prices picked up in the MADE data.

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:42.640
<v Speaker 11>That's correct too. Yeah, I think people drive too much here, Paul.

0:19:42.680 --> 0:19:44.880
<v Speaker 11>That's that's the problem in Los Angeles. It's a that's

0:19:44.880 --> 0:19:48.840
<v Speaker 11>a driving culture. Taxes and regulations don't help. That's the

0:19:48.880 --> 0:19:49.960
<v Speaker 11>short version of the story.

0:19:50.359 --> 0:19:52.840
<v Speaker 1>All right, So what does this all mean for the FED?

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:56.359
<v Speaker 1>They're in lockdown. MOAD done in DC today and tomorrow.

0:19:56.359 --> 0:19:59.399
<v Speaker 1>We'll hear from the FED chairman Jpal tomorrow afternoon. How

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:04.040
<v Speaker 1>do you think he and you know, the FED board

0:20:04.119 --> 0:20:05.399
<v Speaker 1>in general, how are they going to view some of

0:20:05.440 --> 0:20:06.119
<v Speaker 1>this data?

0:20:06.520 --> 0:20:08.760
<v Speaker 11>Well, I think they've communicated pretty clearly that they would

0:20:08.880 --> 0:20:12.520
<v Speaker 11>like to pause so or at least maybe skip this meeting.

0:20:12.640 --> 0:20:15.720
<v Speaker 11>So I think that's the plan here. Does this report

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:17.000
<v Speaker 11>give them cover to do so?

0:20:17.440 --> 0:20:17.640
<v Speaker 6>Yes?

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:21.200
<v Speaker 11>You know, the headline inflation was softer, coming into point one,

0:20:21.480 --> 0:20:23.719
<v Speaker 11>lowest year on year reading in a few years. So

0:20:23.760 --> 0:20:26.879
<v Speaker 11>that that's fine. I think, though, when I look at

0:20:26.920 --> 0:20:29.640
<v Speaker 11>the guts of the report, all jokes aside about about

0:20:29.640 --> 0:20:32.000
<v Speaker 11>food away from home here, I look at that core

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 11>CPI number. It has been point four or point five

0:20:36.560 --> 0:20:40.120
<v Speaker 11>month to month four by mic count six I think,

0:20:40.160 --> 0:20:43.520
<v Speaker 11>six consecutive months now. So to me, that's important because

0:20:43.520 --> 0:20:46.000
<v Speaker 11>that that's giving you a sense of the underlying trend

0:20:46.359 --> 0:20:48.200
<v Speaker 11>when you when you filter through a lot of the noise,

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:52.480
<v Speaker 11>and that shows no signs of really really slowing down.

0:20:53.160 --> 0:20:55.840
<v Speaker 11>I think if you're a policy maker, your hope is

0:20:55.880 --> 0:20:59.119
<v Speaker 11>that rents in the al in the shelter component slows

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:02.080
<v Speaker 11>further as the year progresses. But at this point I

0:21:02.119 --> 0:21:06.120
<v Speaker 11>think that's more hope than anything. So I would yeah,

0:21:06.119 --> 0:21:08.520
<v Speaker 11>maybe they skip, but there there's still there's gonna be

0:21:08.520 --> 0:21:11.000
<v Speaker 11>some discomfort here. I think if we keep getting point

0:21:11.040 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 11>four percent core CPI ratings through the summer.

0:21:13.960 --> 0:21:17.160
<v Speaker 4>Would we look in the warp function in the terminal

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 4>world interest rate probability? Still to your point, Jeffrey, when

0:21:20.520 --> 0:21:23.359
<v Speaker 4>you're thinking about that July meeting, a potential skip, maybe

0:21:23.359 --> 0:21:26.720
<v Speaker 4>tomorrow but still sixty percent odds there that there will

0:21:26.760 --> 0:21:29.439
<v Speaker 4>be a hike next month. What do you think we

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 4>need to see happen in the data in particular between

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:36.159
<v Speaker 4>now and then further to maybe continue this pause, or

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:38.280
<v Speaker 4>maybe on the flip side of that, if the data

0:21:38.280 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 4>comes in still a little bit more persistently stubbornly high

0:21:41.520 --> 0:21:43.399
<v Speaker 4>on the inflation front, to where they might have to

0:21:43.440 --> 0:21:45.560
<v Speaker 4>continue with these rate increases.

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:48.520
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, we think they will, you know, so they'll skip

0:21:48.600 --> 0:21:51.159
<v Speaker 11>then in July they could hike, and it's possible I

0:21:51.160 --> 0:21:54.399
<v Speaker 11>wouldn't rule it out that they hike even another time

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:57.359
<v Speaker 11>later this year, and it goes down to the I

0:21:57.359 --> 0:22:01.640
<v Speaker 11>would say inertia in the core inflation data. You need

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:04.359
<v Speaker 11>a much bigger slowdown. In my view, point four percent

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:05.800
<v Speaker 11>month a month is not going to cut it. So

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:09.480
<v Speaker 11>you need something like point one or even flat readings,

0:22:10.040 --> 0:22:12.800
<v Speaker 11>which tend to be pretty rare historically. I think that's

0:22:12.840 --> 0:22:16.960
<v Speaker 11>the key takeaway. So I don't really see scope for that.

0:22:17.000 --> 0:22:19.919
<v Speaker 11>In fact, we may see rent slow down. I think

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:24.040
<v Speaker 11>there's a lot of forecaster expectation of that, given what

0:22:24.080 --> 0:22:26.399
<v Speaker 11>we've seen in house prices and given what we've seen

0:22:26.400 --> 0:22:30.159
<v Speaker 11>in maybe some private sector rent metrics, So the investors

0:22:30.240 --> 0:22:32.920
<v Speaker 11>or investors and forecast is already expecting that we could

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:36.359
<v Speaker 11>see some offset, though other categories which have been weak

0:22:37.040 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 11>all year could surprise the upsie layer this year. So

0:22:41.000 --> 0:22:43.440
<v Speaker 11>one that I would point out is medical care services.

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 11>Medical care services have been negative, so there's been a

0:22:45.920 --> 0:22:50.040
<v Speaker 11>drag on inflation since last fall. I think a lot

0:22:50.080 --> 0:22:52.240
<v Speaker 11>of that has to do with how the CPI is

0:22:52.600 --> 0:22:57.679
<v Speaker 11>calculating the health insurance figures. So we've been pretty negative,

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:00.240
<v Speaker 11>dragging down over all inflation. That could change as we

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:02.160
<v Speaker 11>get into the fall, and then it could be a positive.

0:23:02.200 --> 0:23:04.760
<v Speaker 11>So all in all, you might get a slow down rents,

0:23:04.800 --> 0:23:06.840
<v Speaker 11>but that could be offset by a pickup in medical

0:23:06.880 --> 0:23:09.840
<v Speaker 11>care services and then your overall core inflation won't slow

0:23:10.320 --> 0:23:12.640
<v Speaker 11>that much at all, and that's going to be problematic

0:23:12.720 --> 0:23:13.800
<v Speaker 11>for the Fed in the second half.

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:17.439
<v Speaker 4>Jeffrey, you have to get your take on the recession debate.

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:20.440
<v Speaker 4>If you look at the ECFC function in the terminal

0:23:20.440 --> 0:23:24.200
<v Speaker 4>where you can see these projections for economists pulled by Bloomberg,

0:23:24.240 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 4>if you look annually, you aren't seeing that contraction there,

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:30.120
<v Speaker 4>and growth prelate quarter of requard continues to get pushed out.

0:23:30.160 --> 0:23:32.359
<v Speaker 4>Now it's just slightly about like five tens of percent

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:34.920
<v Speaker 4>contraction in the third quarter, a little bit around the

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:37.040
<v Speaker 4>same ballpark in the fourth quarter. But it seems like

0:23:37.080 --> 0:23:41.000
<v Speaker 4>investors are even economists in particular, still keep being pushing

0:23:41.040 --> 0:23:45.119
<v Speaker 4>back those recession expectations. What's your call there, Yeah.

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:47.760
<v Speaker 11>I think you have to push out your recession expectations.

0:23:47.760 --> 0:23:48.040
<v Speaker 6>Again.

0:23:48.880 --> 0:23:51.879
<v Speaker 11>We've been joking. This is the most forecast in recession ever.

0:23:52.560 --> 0:23:55.040
<v Speaker 11>Everyone says it's imminent, and then another month of data

0:23:55.080 --> 0:23:57.160
<v Speaker 11>goes by and we see that it's not. I think,

0:23:57.680 --> 0:24:00.719
<v Speaker 11>to be fair to my bearish colleagues, you look at

0:24:00.760 --> 0:24:03.520
<v Speaker 11>leading indicators, if you look at the yield curve, if

0:24:03.520 --> 0:24:05.159
<v Speaker 11>you look at how much the feed is tightened in

0:24:05.160 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 11>the last fifteen months or so, I think it is

0:24:08.200 --> 0:24:10.960
<v Speaker 11>it is is correct, you know, or it is good

0:24:10.960 --> 0:24:14.639
<v Speaker 11>to be prudent, to be cautious. However, for us, simple,

0:24:14.720 --> 0:24:16.679
<v Speaker 11>simple way to look at it. Look at the jobs report.

0:24:17.000 --> 0:24:19.680
<v Speaker 11>Look at the spending power that the consumer has. When

0:24:19.720 --> 0:24:21.719
<v Speaker 11>you think about how many people are employed and how

0:24:21.800 --> 0:24:25.959
<v Speaker 11>much they're earning in aggregate, that's growing around seven percent

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:29.240
<v Speaker 11>year on year through the latest set of data. You

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:31.240
<v Speaker 11>know from the Jobs report that we got a week

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:34.000
<v Speaker 11>or so ago. So right there, that tells you the

0:24:34.000 --> 0:24:37.280
<v Speaker 11>consumer still has spending power. That's really key for us.

0:24:37.400 --> 0:24:39.280
<v Speaker 11>So that means the recession is not imminent. I think

0:24:39.600 --> 0:24:41.120
<v Speaker 11>if you want to push it out in your forecast,

0:24:41.160 --> 0:24:43.480
<v Speaker 11>maybe sometime in the middle of next year would be

0:24:43.520 --> 0:24:45.359
<v Speaker 11>a better It doesn't seem like it's going to be

0:24:45.359 --> 0:24:48.360
<v Speaker 11>a Q three or a Q four occurrence in our view.

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Jeff, we know you hang out with the Hollywood crowd.

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:53.120
<v Speaker 1>What's going on with the writers strike out there? What's

0:24:53.119 --> 0:24:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the status?

0:24:54.840 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 11>You know, I don't hang out with the hall of

0:24:56.520 --> 0:24:59.399
<v Speaker 11>this crowd. I appreciate you trying to loop me in

0:24:59.440 --> 0:25:02.000
<v Speaker 11>with the cool kids, but I don't get those invites.

0:25:02.440 --> 0:25:04.720
<v Speaker 11>Somehow they don't want to hang out and talk about CPI.

0:25:04.880 --> 0:25:07.120
<v Speaker 1>So that is, uh, that's a real issue for that's

0:25:07.119 --> 0:25:08.720
<v Speaker 1>a real issue for that area out there.

0:25:09.160 --> 0:25:11.080
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, in the past it has been, you know, I

0:25:11.119 --> 0:25:14.320
<v Speaker 11>would say in California in general, we're already feeling I

0:25:14.320 --> 0:25:16.280
<v Speaker 11>would say a bigger slowdown. If you look at the

0:25:16.600 --> 0:25:20.119
<v Speaker 11>unemployment rat in California, it's already up half a percentage

0:25:20.240 --> 0:25:23.760
<v Speaker 11>or more since the lows so and so part of

0:25:23.800 --> 0:25:27.040
<v Speaker 11>that could be due to Hollywood I think the bigger story.

0:25:26.760 --> 0:25:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Paul right now is tech.

0:25:28.720 --> 0:25:32.640
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, we definitely felt the the you know, the very

0:25:32.640 --> 0:25:35.160
<v Speaker 11>near effects of the layoffs that you've seen in tech,

0:25:35.440 --> 0:25:37.639
<v Speaker 11>especially in Q one. So I think that is a

0:25:37.640 --> 0:25:40.000
<v Speaker 11>bigger factor than the Hollywood writers strike a at this

0:25:40.040 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 11>point for me.

0:25:40.520 --> 0:25:43.040
<v Speaker 1>All right, all right, well until we start missing our

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:44.760
<v Speaker 1>fall shows and then we're all going to be worried

0:25:44.760 --> 0:25:48.200
<v Speaker 1>about it. Jeffrey Cleveland, director and chief economists at Peydon Rigal.

0:25:48.600 --> 0:25:51.760
<v Speaker 1>He is based in Los Angeles, with getting some la

0:25:51.840 --> 0:25:52.800
<v Speaker 1>color from him when we.

0:25:52.760 --> 0:25:55.720
<v Speaker 4>Can, definitely and also bring in the sunshine.

0:25:57.119 --> 0:26:00.960
<v Speaker 5>You're listening to the Team Cancer Live program Bloomberg Markets

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:04.080
<v Speaker 5>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com, the

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 5>iHeartRadio app, and the Bloomberg Business App, or listen on

0:26:07.359 --> 0:26:09.320
<v Speaker 5>demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:26:12.000 --> 0:26:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Chris Whalen, he's a founder whaling Global Advisors. Hey, Chris,

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:18.200
<v Speaker 1>we got the CPI print today. Kind of how does

0:26:18.200 --> 0:26:20.680
<v Speaker 1>that inform I don't know your view of what we'll

0:26:20.720 --> 0:26:22.880
<v Speaker 1>hear from the FED tomorrow. How does that inform kind

0:26:22.880 --> 0:26:25.719
<v Speaker 1>of your view of markets? Any change there?

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:31.240
<v Speaker 6>Well, I think it's given you know, the manager class

0:26:31.280 --> 0:26:35.080
<v Speaker 6>reasons to go out and buy stocks. My banks are

0:26:35.160 --> 0:26:39.399
<v Speaker 6>running very well, all green other than Deutsche Bank. We

0:26:39.440 --> 0:26:43.560
<v Speaker 6>want to pay attention to them. So the managers want

0:26:43.560 --> 0:26:47.320
<v Speaker 6>to buy it. They will. You know, people don't realize

0:26:47.359 --> 0:26:49.800
<v Speaker 6>that the lesson of the first quarter was it banks

0:26:49.880 --> 0:26:53.800
<v Speaker 6>or not really stocks. They're actually heavily levered credit trades.

0:26:54.040 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 6>But it doesn't matter. They want to own them and

0:26:56.320 --> 0:26:58.800
<v Speaker 6>they will. I mean, so far is the best performer

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:02.159
<v Speaker 6>last year? Well, the ubs and Discover.

0:27:02.880 --> 0:27:05.920
<v Speaker 4>There you were, Chris, what are you buying?

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:06.639
<v Speaker 1>What are you selling?

0:27:08.119 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 6>Well? I did buy a little bit of a New

0:27:10.680 --> 0:27:13.320
<v Speaker 6>York Community Bank. We've talked about that because I know

0:27:13.400 --> 0:27:16.320
<v Speaker 6>the guys at Flagstar very well. I'm a mortgage guy.

0:27:16.880 --> 0:27:19.200
<v Speaker 6>We're going to wait on that one, though, because obviously

0:27:19.280 --> 0:27:21.240
<v Speaker 6>rates aren't going to fall for a while, and that's

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:25.280
<v Speaker 6>a bull market housing trade. Even though you think of

0:27:25.280 --> 0:27:27.399
<v Speaker 6>it as a New York regional bank, it's now a

0:27:27.520 --> 0:27:31.560
<v Speaker 6>national mortgage bank, so you're gonna have to It's funny

0:27:31.600 --> 0:27:34.159
<v Speaker 6>they actually use the flag Star name outside of New

0:27:34.280 --> 0:27:36.679
<v Speaker 6>York because he can't say New York Community Bank in

0:27:36.720 --> 0:27:41.760
<v Speaker 6>California exactly. It wouldn't work. But you know, it's now

0:27:41.800 --> 0:27:46.480
<v Speaker 6>one hundred plus billion dollar mortgage specialist, and meanwhile Comerica

0:27:46.560 --> 0:27:50.040
<v Speaker 6>is tiptoeing out of the mortgage space. This morning, very

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:53.280
<v Speaker 6>interesting report I saw. So I guess what I would

0:27:53.280 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 6>tell you is the inflation numbers are making people feel better,

0:27:56.640 --> 0:27:59.200
<v Speaker 6>but they want to feel better. You know. The bias

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:02.880
<v Speaker 6>of the entire audience in finance in the United States

0:28:02.960 --> 0:28:06.080
<v Speaker 6>is long. Yeah, that's how we get paid, so you know.

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:09.000
<v Speaker 1>Chris, I mean, I mean, is it time for me

0:28:09.080 --> 0:28:12.240
<v Speaker 1>to go out and buy some quality regional banks? I

0:28:12.240 --> 0:28:14.320
<v Speaker 1>don't know, an M and T bank, something like that.

0:28:14.400 --> 0:28:16.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I felt like so many banks are thrown

0:28:16.520 --> 0:28:19.280
<v Speaker 1>out kind of with the bathwater over the last four

0:28:19.359 --> 0:28:20.719
<v Speaker 1>or five six weeks. Is it okay to go out

0:28:20.720 --> 0:28:21.919
<v Speaker 1>there and buy them or do we still have some

0:28:22.600 --> 0:28:24.199
<v Speaker 1>real concerns out there about the sector?

0:28:25.280 --> 0:28:28.600
<v Speaker 6>Well, there are real fundamental concerns about the sector. Everyone

0:28:28.680 --> 0:28:32.479
<v Speaker 6>knows this. The FED took the pistol out of our

0:28:32.600 --> 0:28:36.840
<v Speaker 6>mountains by putting the funding facility out there. That brought

0:28:36.920 --> 0:28:40.480
<v Speaker 6>us some time, but it doesn't change the negative cash flow.

0:28:40.960 --> 0:28:44.240
<v Speaker 6>I wrote about this in the blog yesterday. The amount

0:28:44.320 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 6>of paper that people are sitting on that they're losing

0:28:47.440 --> 0:28:51.360
<v Speaker 6>money on every day is growing. You know, Bill Nelson

0:28:51.400 --> 0:28:54.360
<v Speaker 6>at Bank Policy Institute writes great stuff on the FED,

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:56.520
<v Speaker 6>and he talked about the fact that they're losing a

0:28:56.560 --> 0:28:59.560
<v Speaker 6>billion dollars a day at the FED because of the

0:28:59.600 --> 0:29:02.080
<v Speaker 6>difference between what they earn and what they're paying out.

0:29:02.400 --> 0:29:05.600
<v Speaker 6>Same thing with the banks. So depending on who it is,

0:29:05.920 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 6>and depending on your willingness to sit with it all

0:29:08.680 --> 0:29:13.760
<v Speaker 6>year until the real fundamentals for banks improve. That's really

0:29:13.840 --> 0:29:15.400
<v Speaker 6>the question you got to ask. Are they cheap?

0:29:15.480 --> 0:29:15.640
<v Speaker 7>Yes?

0:29:15.840 --> 0:29:19.040
<v Speaker 6>US Bank at one time's book my god, But I

0:29:19.280 --> 0:29:22.320
<v Speaker 6>just made a decision in twenty to move up the

0:29:22.360 --> 0:29:25.720
<v Speaker 6>capital structure into preferreds until I had a little more

0:29:25.800 --> 0:29:29.880
<v Speaker 6>visibility on banks because the FED took so much earning

0:29:29.960 --> 0:29:33.120
<v Speaker 6>power away from banks during QI, and they're now trying

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 6>to readjust their cost structure and what they earn on

0:29:36.720 --> 0:29:39.520
<v Speaker 6>their assets for the future. But that means a year

0:29:39.560 --> 0:29:41.960
<v Speaker 6>from that. So if you buy banks, you got to

0:29:42.000 --> 0:29:42.479
<v Speaker 6>be patient.

0:29:42.840 --> 0:29:45.480
<v Speaker 1>How important are management teams when I'm looking at a

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:48.160
<v Speaker 1>bank stock, Oh, very crucial?

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:48.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah.

0:29:49.280 --> 0:29:53.400
<v Speaker 6>Do they understand duration number one? And do they understand credit?

0:29:54.200 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 6>Because if you look at Silicon Valley Bank, these guys

0:29:56.680 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 6>basically shot themselves in the head they kept buying more

0:30:00.120 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 6>mortgage backs, and then half the book prepaid, they bought

0:30:02.960 --> 0:30:06.160
<v Speaker 6>more and by twenty one, end of twenty one, that

0:30:06.240 --> 0:30:09.520
<v Speaker 6>bank is dead. They just didn't know it yet. So,

0:30:10.280 --> 0:30:12.680
<v Speaker 6>you know, credit is the second thing we're going into.

0:30:12.680 --> 0:30:14.760
<v Speaker 6>Maybe a recession. I don't know, guys, So we haven't

0:30:14.760 --> 0:30:17.440
<v Speaker 6>a recession. I think this economy is going to ignore

0:30:17.480 --> 0:30:20.240
<v Speaker 6>the Fed. What do we do then? What do we

0:30:20.280 --> 0:30:22.360
<v Speaker 6>do if we just continue to chug along the way?

0:30:22.440 --> 0:30:26.880
<v Speaker 6>We are no recession? Think about what the FED has done.

0:30:26.960 --> 0:30:29.280
<v Speaker 6>They have increased the cost of credit for the front

0:30:29.400 --> 0:30:33.440
<v Speaker 6>end of the economy, the productive part, but the long end. No,

0:30:34.480 --> 0:30:36.520
<v Speaker 6>are we going to die because mortgage rates are at

0:30:36.560 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 6>seven percent? No, We're going to do business. So I

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:44.000
<v Speaker 6>think the private sector is incredibly strong in this country,

0:30:44.520 --> 0:30:48.400
<v Speaker 6>and maybe those rate cuts during COVID were unnecessary.

0:30:50.320 --> 0:30:52.800
<v Speaker 4>Chris coming out just a few months after a lot

0:30:52.800 --> 0:30:55.560
<v Speaker 4>of those concerns about some of those regional bank stresses

0:30:55.600 --> 0:30:59.000
<v Speaker 4>in March, what are deposit flows telling us at this point?

0:31:00.560 --> 0:31:02.720
<v Speaker 6>Well, they kind of came back by the end of

0:31:02.720 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 6>the quarter. In other words, the outflows slowed down. This

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:09.960
<v Speaker 6>was partly because Treasury wasn't selling any paper and The

0:31:10.080 --> 0:31:12.800
<v Speaker 6>delay with the debt ceiling now forces them to go

0:31:12.880 --> 0:31:16.280
<v Speaker 6>out and basically refund about a trillion dollars, and they

0:31:16.320 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 6>are outflows constantly during this period, so they'll end up

0:31:19.800 --> 0:31:24.040
<v Speaker 6>with six seven hundred billion sitting in the TGA. But unfortunately,

0:31:24.120 --> 0:31:26.880
<v Speaker 6>every dollar they raise means that a bank deposits going

0:31:26.920 --> 0:31:31.480
<v Speaker 6>to disappear because Treasury is indeficit. Every time a bond

0:31:31.520 --> 0:31:34.360
<v Speaker 6>on the books of the FED matures, Treasury has to

0:31:34.400 --> 0:31:38.800
<v Speaker 6>refinance that bond immediately, So that's why banks are under

0:31:38.840 --> 0:31:42.320
<v Speaker 6>so much pressure. Now. We're hoping that the difference between

0:31:42.320 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 6>the reverses that the FED has been maintaining for money

0:31:45.280 --> 0:31:48.080
<v Speaker 6>market funds to help them are going to run off.

0:31:48.360 --> 0:31:51.000
<v Speaker 6>We're hoping that that problem is going to leave and

0:31:51.040 --> 0:31:54.160
<v Speaker 6>the FED is going to be able to simplify policy

0:31:54.280 --> 0:31:57.880
<v Speaker 6>going forward by not having to support banks and the

0:31:58.000 --> 0:32:02.200
<v Speaker 6>GSS and the money market funds with the reverse repurchase agreements.

0:32:02.640 --> 0:32:05.880
<v Speaker 6>That would simplify life a little bit for Chairman Powell.

0:32:06.560 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 6>But other than that, I think they got to run

0:32:08.600 --> 0:32:10.440
<v Speaker 6>off the bounce sheet. My hope is they're going to

0:32:10.520 --> 0:32:14.360
<v Speaker 6>pause and start selling more bonds. What I would do

0:32:14.400 --> 0:32:16.280
<v Speaker 6>if I were Powells is I would tell the FETE

0:32:16.280 --> 0:32:19.640
<v Speaker 6>of New York, make sure you hit the cap every

0:32:19.720 --> 0:32:22.959
<v Speaker 6>month for the runoff of the mortgage backed security. So

0:32:23.000 --> 0:32:25.920
<v Speaker 6>if the natural runoff is half of the cap, that

0:32:26.000 --> 0:32:27.640
<v Speaker 6>means they got to sell some bonds.

0:32:28.120 --> 0:32:32.240
<v Speaker 4>You're when you're talking about money market funds specifically, because

0:32:32.280 --> 0:32:34.480
<v Speaker 4>so much money has been plowed into those, At what

0:32:34.520 --> 0:32:36.320
<v Speaker 4>point you can see even more of that money go

0:32:36.440 --> 0:32:37.240
<v Speaker 4>toward equities?

0:32:38.200 --> 0:32:40.760
<v Speaker 6>Well, that's the thing it was. It was rising over

0:32:40.760 --> 0:32:43.600
<v Speaker 6>the last couple of months, so over two trillion dollars.

0:32:43.640 --> 0:32:46.400
<v Speaker 6>Now that if half of that money went back in act,

0:32:46.400 --> 0:32:49.160
<v Speaker 6>what he's going to be a tremendous boot to the market.

0:32:49.520 --> 0:32:51.680
<v Speaker 6>But I think more likely it's going to go into

0:32:51.680 --> 0:32:54.760
<v Speaker 6>T bills because these are not risky funds, these are

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:55.640
<v Speaker 6>money markets.

0:32:55.720 --> 0:32:57.800
<v Speaker 4>Is it because of just being able to deald more

0:32:57.840 --> 0:32:58.640
<v Speaker 4>than five for sure?

0:32:59.240 --> 0:33:01.480
<v Speaker 6>Sure? If youre going to pick up thirty BIPs by

0:33:01.520 --> 0:33:03.720
<v Speaker 6>going out of money market funds and the T bills,

0:33:03.720 --> 0:33:06.400
<v Speaker 6>you're going to do it. Absolutely. I just took a

0:33:06.400 --> 0:33:09.000
<v Speaker 6>big pile off the table on a video I had

0:33:09.040 --> 0:33:11.959
<v Speaker 6>gone in in twenty twenty one. I was staring at

0:33:11.960 --> 0:33:14.360
<v Speaker 6>a one hundred and fifty percent game. I had to

0:33:14.400 --> 0:33:18.320
<v Speaker 6>take it I put it in T bills, you know exactly.

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:22.240
<v Speaker 6>And remember if you sell a money market fund and

0:33:22.360 --> 0:33:26.360
<v Speaker 6>buy a T bill, but deposit disappears, it's a producery deposit,

0:33:26.480 --> 0:33:30.000
<v Speaker 6>but it still disappears. So the system is going to

0:33:30.000 --> 0:33:33.400
<v Speaker 6>be running off cash banking system as the FED balance

0:33:33.440 --> 0:33:35.760
<v Speaker 6>sheet shrinks. How far can we go?

0:33:35.960 --> 0:33:36.160
<v Speaker 7>Yep?

0:33:36.200 --> 0:33:38.280
<v Speaker 6>That's the real that's the big question, all.

0:33:38.280 --> 0:33:40.360
<v Speaker 1>Right, Chris, Chris, always good stuff. We love, We appreciate

0:33:40.360 --> 0:33:43.000
<v Speaker 1>getting few minutes of your time. Chris Whalen. He's a

0:33:43.080 --> 0:33:45.840
<v Speaker 1>chairman of Whaling Global Advisors and just one of the

0:33:45.880 --> 0:33:49.640
<v Speaker 1>top I think bank analysts out there that like talking to.

0:33:49.760 --> 0:33:51.120
<v Speaker 1>And it was just great, you know, over the last

0:33:51.240 --> 0:33:54.480
<v Speaker 1>couple three months when we're having those real big stories

0:33:54.520 --> 0:33:56.400
<v Speaker 1>about some of those regional banks, he was just critical

0:33:56.440 --> 0:33:58.160
<v Speaker 1>for us kind of getting a handle on that. So

0:33:58.960 --> 0:34:01.160
<v Speaker 1>good touching base with Chris Wayll and a Whale and

0:34:01.200 --> 0:34:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Global Advisors.

0:34:02.120 --> 0:34:05.160
<v Speaker 5>You're listening to the tape. Ken's are Live program Bloomberg

0:34:05.280 --> 0:34:08.880
<v Speaker 5>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:34:08.920 --> 0:34:10.879
<v Speaker 5>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and.

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:12.160
<v Speaker 7>The Bloomberg Business app.

0:34:12.200 --> 0:34:15.000
<v Speaker 5>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:34:15.040 --> 0:34:19.399
<v Speaker 5>flagship New York station. Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven.

0:34:19.120 --> 0:34:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Thirty, Jess Men and Paul Sweeney here in the Bloomberg

0:34:22.880 --> 0:34:25.160
<v Speaker 1>Interactive Brokers Studio. Want to get right to our next guest,

0:34:25.160 --> 0:34:27.759
<v Speaker 1>because I'm going to talk about markets and where to

0:34:27.800 --> 0:34:30.239
<v Speaker 1>go here, because there's a lot of economic data flying out,

0:34:30.360 --> 0:34:32.560
<v Speaker 1>flying around out there. It's a big week. I want

0:34:32.560 --> 0:34:34.879
<v Speaker 1>to know what the pros are doing and what they're

0:34:34.880 --> 0:34:37.000
<v Speaker 1>telling their clients. Tim Pagliarra joins, and he is the

0:34:37.040 --> 0:34:41.719
<v Speaker 1>CIO of cap Wealth based down in Tennessee. Our good

0:34:41.719 --> 0:34:43.799
<v Speaker 1>friends down in Tennessee. Tim, thanks so much for joining

0:34:43.880 --> 0:34:46.360
<v Speaker 1>us here. We're in Tennessee. Are you Franklin?

0:34:47.200 --> 0:34:48.160
<v Speaker 12>Franklin, Tennessee?

0:34:48.280 --> 0:34:48.560
<v Speaker 7>All right?

0:34:48.600 --> 0:34:50.560
<v Speaker 1>You have to answer one question from him? Dying to

0:34:50.560 --> 0:34:54.120
<v Speaker 1>know this about Nashville. Why has Nashville become the bachelorette

0:34:54.520 --> 0:34:56.680
<v Speaker 1>party capital of the world.

0:34:57.360 --> 0:34:59.000
<v Speaker 4>What about Austin? Austin's a lot of fun.

0:34:58.960 --> 0:35:01.439
<v Speaker 1>I think, I don't know what. Tell me Nationals where

0:35:01.440 --> 0:35:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the youngest leaders are going.

0:35:02.719 --> 0:35:03.840
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, that's where the kids go.

0:35:04.040 --> 0:35:07.120
<v Speaker 12>I think, because they facilitate it, they'll let them do

0:35:07.280 --> 0:35:08.120
<v Speaker 12>just about anything.

0:35:09.800 --> 0:35:12.040
<v Speaker 1>All right. I just I went down there on a

0:35:12.080 --> 0:35:13.480
<v Speaker 1>business trip and they were all over the place.

0:35:13.560 --> 0:35:14.160
<v Speaker 13>You're not wrong.

0:35:14.960 --> 0:35:17.480
<v Speaker 12>It used to be Vegas, but now it's what happens

0:35:17.520 --> 0:35:19.839
<v Speaker 12>in Nashville, all right.

0:35:19.880 --> 0:35:22.440
<v Speaker 1>Good to know. And Franklin is just outside of Nashville,

0:35:22.440 --> 0:35:25.080
<v Speaker 1>so hopefully safely outside there. So Tim, you know, we've

0:35:25.120 --> 0:35:27.279
<v Speaker 1>had a nice run in this market. But I want

0:35:27.320 --> 0:35:29.320
<v Speaker 1>to get your thoughts on. If I look at SPX,

0:35:29.360 --> 0:35:31.520
<v Speaker 1>I see a nice story up, you know, eleven twelve percent.

0:35:31.560 --> 0:35:34.600
<v Speaker 1>If I look at SPW the equal weighted, it's kind

0:35:34.640 --> 0:35:38.040
<v Speaker 1>of flat. So I got the magnificent seven stocks kind

0:35:38.040 --> 0:35:42.040
<v Speaker 1>of ruling the day here. Is that a concern for you?

0:35:42.200 --> 0:35:42.680
<v Speaker 6>Very much? So?

0:35:43.280 --> 0:35:47.319
<v Speaker 12>I mean, it's frothy, and it is a sign that

0:35:48.960 --> 0:35:51.600
<v Speaker 12>you know it can't continue, you know, because we were

0:35:51.600 --> 0:35:57.359
<v Speaker 12>pushing valuations before, and the seven stocks are accounting for

0:35:57.440 --> 0:36:00.480
<v Speaker 12>about ninety five ninety six percent of their turn the index.

0:36:01.440 --> 0:36:04.760
<v Speaker 4>I got to ask, though, because looking month to date,

0:36:05.040 --> 0:36:09.200
<v Speaker 4>you're starting to see some of these other sectors beginning

0:36:09.280 --> 0:36:12.920
<v Speaker 4>to pick up, whether you're looking at industrials, energy, financials,

0:36:13.840 --> 0:36:18.080
<v Speaker 4>also small caps auditear up more than eight percent this month.

0:36:18.600 --> 0:36:20.000
<v Speaker 4>What do you need to see happen to give you

0:36:20.040 --> 0:36:21.920
<v Speaker 4>more conviction that this is broadening.

0:36:21.480 --> 0:36:28.239
<v Speaker 12>Out, I think guidance from the Fed about what they're

0:36:28.280 --> 0:36:31.000
<v Speaker 12>going to do and how much time they are going

0:36:31.120 --> 0:36:35.840
<v Speaker 12>to allow us to get to that two percent inflation target.

0:36:36.040 --> 0:36:38.640
<v Speaker 12>Bloomberg had a good survey that was out this week,

0:36:40.400 --> 0:36:43.120
<v Speaker 12>and fifty four percent of the respondents felt like it

0:36:43.200 --> 0:36:46.239
<v Speaker 12>was going to take a little over two years to

0:36:46.280 --> 0:36:50.400
<v Speaker 12>get to that two percent inflation target. About eleven percent

0:36:50.440 --> 0:36:53.560
<v Speaker 12>of the respondents felt like it would take five years.

0:36:54.000 --> 0:36:57.640
<v Speaker 12>So it's just a question of how much patience the

0:36:57.680 --> 0:37:00.520
<v Speaker 12>FED is going to have and how concerned they are

0:37:01.120 --> 0:37:04.560
<v Speaker 12>that they may break something if they push too hard.

0:37:04.680 --> 0:37:06.799
<v Speaker 12>And there's a lot of signs of stress in the

0:37:06.840 --> 0:37:07.719
<v Speaker 12>system right now.

0:37:08.160 --> 0:37:12.640
<v Speaker 4>So given that backdrop, how are you positioning very very

0:37:12.640 --> 0:37:17.880
<v Speaker 4>defensively really, and even even after eight months, systems below

0:37:17.960 --> 0:37:20.920
<v Speaker 4>in October and just have to.

0:37:20.880 --> 0:37:24.160
<v Speaker 12>Be you have to be disciplined and this and the

0:37:24.239 --> 0:37:28.279
<v Speaker 12>first time in I think it's twelve fourteen years, we've

0:37:28.280 --> 0:37:33.719
<v Speaker 12>got a fifteen percent position in treasuries. The FAD, you know,

0:37:33.760 --> 0:37:37.480
<v Speaker 12>they've got problems that they have to fix. And even

0:37:37.520 --> 0:37:40.920
<v Speaker 12>this past week where you saw the park turned the

0:37:41.000 --> 0:37:45.480
<v Speaker 12>keys back over to their properties in Union Square and

0:37:45.600 --> 0:37:49.520
<v Speaker 12>walk away from you know too magnificent hotel property. Yep,

0:37:49.840 --> 0:37:52.520
<v Speaker 12>that has a ripple effect through the system. It's not

0:37:52.600 --> 0:37:56.080
<v Speaker 12>just that property and it's not just San Francisco, and

0:37:56.160 --> 0:37:59.080
<v Speaker 12>so those are the things that you have to watch

0:37:59.160 --> 0:38:02.080
<v Speaker 12>and be conser learned about in the contagion what it

0:38:02.120 --> 0:38:04.799
<v Speaker 12>could cause for the rest of the markets.

0:38:05.320 --> 0:38:08.120
<v Speaker 1>You know, we're just looking. Abigail Doolittle, who covers the

0:38:08.160 --> 0:38:12.560
<v Speaker 1>markets for Bloomberg, she mentioned earlier today that you know,

0:38:12.600 --> 0:38:14.200
<v Speaker 1>this market's starting to broaden out a little bit in

0:38:14.239 --> 0:38:16.400
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of weeks, and she point out to

0:38:16.440 --> 0:38:19.720
<v Speaker 1>like the Russell two thousand up one point one today

0:38:19.760 --> 0:38:22.600
<v Speaker 1>outperforming the S and P five hundred. Is small mid

0:38:22.640 --> 0:38:25.280
<v Speaker 1>cap a place where you think people should be looking

0:38:25.320 --> 0:38:27.520
<v Speaker 1>to the extent that maybe they missed them that big

0:38:27.560 --> 0:38:28.120
<v Speaker 1>cap rally.

0:38:29.600 --> 0:38:32.880
<v Speaker 12>Absolutely. I mean we take an all cap approach, and

0:38:32.960 --> 0:38:36.799
<v Speaker 12>I think you can find some some great values, you know,

0:38:36.920 --> 0:38:40.920
<v Speaker 12>in that sector right now. But it is an individual

0:38:41.120 --> 0:38:46.879
<v Speaker 12>stock market, and so people that own individual securities and

0:38:46.920 --> 0:38:50.279
<v Speaker 12>that are not you know, dependent on the indexes for

0:38:50.360 --> 0:38:53.240
<v Speaker 12>their returns, they're the they're going to be the beneficiaries

0:38:53.280 --> 0:38:53.879
<v Speaker 12>of all of us.

0:38:54.040 --> 0:38:57.200
<v Speaker 4>What are your top stock picks?

0:38:57.880 --> 0:39:01.440
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, and very broadly, we still Likeshire halfaway because of

0:39:01.480 --> 0:39:02.320
<v Speaker 12>the cash position.

0:39:02.440 --> 0:39:04.880
<v Speaker 4>You know, that's actually getting close class B shares close

0:39:04.960 --> 0:39:07.560
<v Speaker 4>to a record, and obviously they have a very hefty

0:39:07.680 --> 0:39:09.080
<v Speaker 4>steak in Apple as.

0:39:08.960 --> 0:39:13.880
<v Speaker 12>We know, right, But you know, so I would be

0:39:14.360 --> 0:39:21.280
<v Speaker 12>I like Berkshire, I like CBS. We like a company

0:39:21.360 --> 0:39:23.759
<v Speaker 12>that I really can't mention it because it's below five

0:39:23.840 --> 0:39:28.839
<v Speaker 12>dollars and they're in transition, but they're in the they're

0:39:28.880 --> 0:39:37.080
<v Speaker 12>in the technology space, yeah, in fighting internet, high speed fiber.

0:39:38.440 --> 0:39:40.399
<v Speaker 12>So I think you just have to look at those

0:39:40.480 --> 0:39:44.799
<v Speaker 12>companies that have been hit really hard because of maybe

0:39:44.840 --> 0:39:48.239
<v Speaker 12>their balance sheet and was overreacting, you know to that,

0:39:48.680 --> 0:39:51.880
<v Speaker 12>because we believe it's important to have strong balance sheets

0:39:51.920 --> 0:39:54.400
<v Speaker 12>and not have to depend on the capital markets. But

0:39:54.440 --> 0:39:57.080
<v Speaker 12>you can also take that a little too far. And

0:39:57.160 --> 0:39:59.279
<v Speaker 12>so those are some of the companies we're looking at.

0:39:59.560 --> 0:40:03.719
<v Speaker 12>Regional banks. There are some that you know that have

0:40:03.840 --> 0:40:04.840
<v Speaker 12>come up on the radar.

0:40:05.120 --> 0:40:06.759
<v Speaker 4>Which which regionals do you like?

0:40:07.160 --> 0:40:09.719
<v Speaker 12>Well, I'm in an acquisition period on some of them,

0:40:09.719 --> 0:40:14.200
<v Speaker 12>so I can't. Okay, I can't say, but but that's

0:40:14.239 --> 0:40:17.520
<v Speaker 12>in a general way, that's what I would that's what

0:40:17.520 --> 0:40:18.200
<v Speaker 12>I would look at.

0:40:18.280 --> 0:40:18.759
<v Speaker 1>So you were.

0:40:18.640 --> 0:40:22.160
<v Speaker 4>Buying the dip then on those banks that potential ones

0:40:22.280 --> 0:40:24.719
<v Speaker 4>that obviously were seeing their stock prices for all the

0:40:24.760 --> 0:40:25.360
<v Speaker 4>last couple.

0:40:25.200 --> 0:40:29.759
<v Speaker 12>Of months, we're shuffling the deck. So I like to

0:40:29.800 --> 0:40:34.600
<v Speaker 12>compare it to, you know, being the general manager of

0:40:34.320 --> 0:40:37.719
<v Speaker 12>a football team and we're trying to improve the team

0:40:37.760 --> 0:40:40.000
<v Speaker 12>that we've got on the on the field. So that

0:40:40.120 --> 0:40:44.080
<v Speaker 12>might be peeling off some Apple and buying something else

0:40:44.120 --> 0:40:48.400
<v Speaker 12>that we like in that space without abandoning Apple.

0:40:49.120 --> 0:40:51.919
<v Speaker 4>You know, is it just because a little pricey after

0:40:51.920 --> 0:40:52.920
<v Speaker 4>the record run it's been on.

0:40:54.719 --> 0:40:57.920
<v Speaker 12>Yeah. And you know, fortunately, when you buy something at

0:40:57.920 --> 0:41:00.319
<v Speaker 12>a at a cheap price and it gets to a

0:41:00.360 --> 0:41:03.520
<v Speaker 12>client's portfolio and it's up to six or seven or

0:41:03.560 --> 0:41:05.880
<v Speaker 12>eight percent, then you you know, you have an obligation

0:41:06.120 --> 0:41:09.680
<v Speaker 12>really to to look at what you put seven or

0:41:09.680 --> 0:41:12.440
<v Speaker 12>eight percent of a client's money in a single company

0:41:12.560 --> 0:41:16.680
<v Speaker 12>to start out, and the answer is generally no. So

0:41:18.040 --> 0:41:21.560
<v Speaker 12>then you have to go through the process of selling

0:41:21.840 --> 0:41:25.040
<v Speaker 12>and then looking for things that you know represent a

0:41:25.120 --> 0:41:29.279
<v Speaker 12>better value and a longer runway for success.

0:41:29.840 --> 0:41:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Tim just about thirty seconds this AI hype boy. It's

0:41:33.080 --> 0:41:34.839
<v Speaker 1>moving a lot of names. How do you think about it?

0:41:36.840 --> 0:41:40.240
<v Speaker 12>I mean, if you know, if you've just used Navidia

0:41:40.320 --> 0:41:43.600
<v Speaker 12>as an example. You know, forty times sales is a

0:41:43.800 --> 0:41:47.960
<v Speaker 12>you know, it's an alarm bell. And I think what

0:41:48.239 --> 0:41:50.160
<v Speaker 12>in the end, at the end of the day, it's

0:41:50.239 --> 0:41:55.520
<v Speaker 12>not the chip. It is the software applications. It's the

0:41:55.640 --> 0:42:00.480
<v Speaker 12>use of those of that technology that's ultimately going to

0:42:00.600 --> 0:42:04.319
<v Speaker 12>have the value. You know, It's like Maverick, it's not

0:42:04.480 --> 0:42:09.440
<v Speaker 12>the it's not the plane, it's the pilot, right, you know,

0:42:09.520 --> 0:42:12.600
<v Speaker 12>it's going to be the software. You know, company like

0:42:12.719 --> 0:42:16.120
<v Speaker 12>paland here for example, is one of our you know,

0:42:16.239 --> 0:42:19.359
<v Speaker 12>one of the companies, right, greatly from that.

0:42:19.280 --> 0:42:21.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, Tim, thanks very much. Tim Pagley, our CIO

0:42:21.800 --> 0:42:24.840
<v Speaker 1>of cap Wealth, giving us his latest. This is Bloomberg.

0:42:25.080 --> 0:42:28.160
<v Speaker 5>You're listening to the tape. Can's our live program Bloomberg

0:42:28.239 --> 0:42:31.840
<v Speaker 5>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:42:31.880 --> 0:42:34.040
<v Speaker 5>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and the.

0:42:33.920 --> 0:42:35.120
<v Speaker 7>Bloomberg Business app.

0:42:35.160 --> 0:42:37.960
<v Speaker 5>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:42:38.000 --> 0:42:43.120
<v Speaker 5>flagship New York station, just say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:42:44.200 --> 0:42:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Let's do retail. What are you consumers buying in terms

0:42:47.160 --> 0:42:50.960
<v Speaker 1>of clothing? That's a big part. Yeah, exactly, Dnim, I'm

0:42:50.960 --> 0:42:53.480
<v Speaker 1>all in on that. I mean Scott Baxter joints his

0:42:53.560 --> 0:42:57.640
<v Speaker 1>Contour brands. That is a publicly traded symbol. Kt is

0:42:57.680 --> 0:42:58.160
<v Speaker 1>the ticker.

0:42:58.360 --> 0:43:00.799
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I know, host a six percent today.

0:43:01.040 --> 0:43:03.600
<v Speaker 1>So all right, So Scott Baxter joins us, he's the CEO.

0:43:04.080 --> 0:43:06.320
<v Speaker 1>He joins us here in our Bloomberg and Active Broker studio.

0:43:06.320 --> 0:43:10.120
<v Speaker 1>They're based in where, North Carolina, Greensboro, Greensboro on a

0:43:10.120 --> 0:43:12.799
<v Speaker 1>beautiful place down there in Greensboro. Scott talked to us

0:43:12.800 --> 0:43:16.360
<v Speaker 1>about Contour brands. You've got the ones. I really know

0:43:16.400 --> 0:43:19.560
<v Speaker 1>what everybody knows what is Lee Jeans, Wrangler Wrangler, which

0:43:19.600 --> 0:43:21.839
<v Speaker 1>is if you're a cowboy Texas, that's it.

0:43:21.920 --> 0:43:22.319
<v Speaker 7>There you go.

0:43:22.400 --> 0:43:24.399
<v Speaker 4>If you're all the regulars in Texas, let me tell you.

0:43:25.320 --> 0:43:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Justice from Texas. What to Texas, A and M. Cowboys

0:43:28.040 --> 0:43:29.440
<v Speaker 1>only wear Wrangler, right, I.

0:43:29.360 --> 0:43:31.120
<v Speaker 4>Mean that's the predominant one, that.

0:43:31.160 --> 0:43:34.040
<v Speaker 10>Is true cowboys exactly.

0:43:34.239 --> 0:43:35.920
<v Speaker 1>So Scott talk to us about these brands you have

0:43:36.000 --> 0:43:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Lee and Wrangler and the rest of the brands you're managing.

0:43:39.719 --> 0:43:42.080
<v Speaker 13>So so, Wrangler have been around since nineteen oh four.

0:43:42.160 --> 0:43:44.319
<v Speaker 13>Lee has been around for over one hundred years. Both

0:43:44.360 --> 0:43:47.759
<v Speaker 13>brands global brands, both brands strong in China, Europe, North

0:43:47.800 --> 0:43:49.960
<v Speaker 13>America of course, and then we have a few other

0:43:50.000 --> 0:43:52.319
<v Speaker 13>brands that are prominent for us, like All Terrain Gear

0:43:52.680 --> 0:43:55.320
<v Speaker 13>and also Rock and Republic denim. So we have a

0:43:55.400 --> 0:43:58.480
<v Speaker 13>nice portfolio, but the predominant piece of our portfolio is

0:43:58.640 --> 0:43:59.799
<v Speaker 13>both Wrangler and Lee.

0:44:00.000 --> 0:44:03.280
<v Speaker 4>So you're expanding out to China and other areas in Asia.

0:44:03.360 --> 0:44:04.160
<v Speaker 4>Tell us more about that.

0:44:04.280 --> 0:44:07.320
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, So we've done some really nice licensing deals around Asia,

0:44:07.480 --> 0:44:09.879
<v Speaker 13>and then we have a direct business in China which

0:44:09.920 --> 0:44:12.040
<v Speaker 13>is fairly significant, so it's a big part.

0:44:11.920 --> 0:44:14.040
<v Speaker 10>Of our portfolio. It's mostly Lee with a.

0:44:13.960 --> 0:44:16.839
<v Speaker 13>Little bit of Wrangler, but we have been there over

0:44:16.920 --> 0:44:19.279
<v Speaker 13>thirty years, so we have a real strong consumer base

0:44:19.320 --> 0:44:20.680
<v Speaker 13>there that know our product really well.

0:44:21.320 --> 0:44:23.800
<v Speaker 1>So what's going on over there for your business?

0:44:23.840 --> 0:44:25.719
<v Speaker 10>You know, it's opened back up, thank god.

0:44:25.840 --> 0:44:27.799
<v Speaker 13>Right, So, we went through a period like everybody did,

0:44:27.800 --> 0:44:30.000
<v Speaker 13>where China was closed and a lot of retail was closed,

0:44:30.000 --> 0:44:31.640
<v Speaker 13>and it's opened back up here recently.

0:44:31.680 --> 0:44:34.399
<v Speaker 10>So for us, it's been how do you so you.

0:44:33.840 --> 0:44:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Do you license your you said early? Do you license

0:44:36.000 --> 0:44:37.960
<v Speaker 1>or do you manufacture and export?

0:44:38.200 --> 0:44:41.840
<v Speaker 13>We license our brand to some parts of Asia, but

0:44:41.880 --> 0:44:43.960
<v Speaker 13>we actually own our operations in China.

0:44:44.120 --> 0:44:46.239
<v Speaker 10>Okay, and we make our product. You know, in China

0:44:46.239 --> 0:44:47.200
<v Speaker 10>face we're comfortable with that.

0:44:47.400 --> 0:44:48.640
<v Speaker 1>He you gotta be less comfortable you were of a

0:44:48.640 --> 0:44:49.200
<v Speaker 1>few years ago.

0:44:49.360 --> 0:44:51.839
<v Speaker 13>Right now everything's okay, okay, So for us right now

0:44:51.920 --> 0:44:53.160
<v Speaker 13>is everything's just fine.

0:44:53.560 --> 0:44:54.200
<v Speaker 10>And what does this.

0:44:54.200 --> 0:44:58.600
<v Speaker 4>Tell us about the consumer more broadly? Not just obviously

0:44:58.800 --> 0:45:00.720
<v Speaker 4>we're not talking about just the US nsumer here. Obviously,

0:45:00.719 --> 0:45:02.319
<v Speaker 4>when you're looking at these other markets, what is it

0:45:02.320 --> 0:45:03.720
<v Speaker 4>telling us about the global economy?

0:45:03.760 --> 0:45:05.919
<v Speaker 13>You know, the global economy I think is treading water

0:45:06.000 --> 0:45:07.680
<v Speaker 13>right now. You know, you saw some of the news

0:45:07.680 --> 0:45:10.279
<v Speaker 13>here out of Europe. Not recently China has opened back

0:45:10.360 --> 0:45:12.319
<v Speaker 13>up so a little bit stronger, and I think here

0:45:12.320 --> 0:45:15.080
<v Speaker 13>in the US, the consumer is it's tough for the

0:45:15.080 --> 0:45:17.839
<v Speaker 13>consumer right now. Right all they're borrowing is a little

0:45:17.840 --> 0:45:20.319
<v Speaker 13>bit more expensive than it has been, so that takes

0:45:20.360 --> 0:45:21.800
<v Speaker 13>a little bit out of a family's budget.

0:45:23.680 --> 0:45:27.399
<v Speaker 1>So the for your you do most of your manufacturing,

0:45:27.480 --> 0:45:28.840
<v Speaker 1>right you don't contract that out.

0:45:28.680 --> 0:45:30.120
<v Speaker 10>About thirty five to forty percent.

0:45:30.160 --> 0:45:33.280
<v Speaker 13>We own our manufacturing in Mexico and then the rest

0:45:33.360 --> 0:45:34.720
<v Speaker 13>is outsourced throughout the globe.

0:45:34.719 --> 0:45:36.319
<v Speaker 1>And how's that versus your competitors.

0:45:37.040 --> 0:45:39.560
<v Speaker 13>We're really the only ones and while we're you know,

0:45:39.600 --> 0:45:41.239
<v Speaker 13>we've owned those for so long. We think of it

0:45:41.280 --> 0:45:44.360
<v Speaker 13>as a competitive advantage. It's speed to market, it's innovation,

0:45:44.560 --> 0:45:46.759
<v Speaker 13>so we can control our own destiny. It's been a

0:45:46.760 --> 0:45:49.160
<v Speaker 13>really good deal for us. And think about the time

0:45:49.320 --> 0:45:52.400
<v Speaker 13>during the pandemic. Owning our own manufacturing during the pandemic

0:45:52.480 --> 0:45:53.440
<v Speaker 13>was clearly a positive.

0:45:53.600 --> 0:45:55.840
<v Speaker 4>So having that competitive advantage there.

0:45:55.760 --> 0:45:58.399
<v Speaker 13>Oh absolutely, I mean we were keeping our factories open,

0:45:58.440 --> 0:46:01.120
<v Speaker 13>we were rolling product in the whole time, So really

0:46:01.160 --> 0:46:01.760
<v Speaker 13>good position.

0:46:01.840 --> 0:46:06.719
<v Speaker 1>All right, what's the just generic market share? Wrangler, Lee, Levi's,

0:46:06.840 --> 0:46:08.120
<v Speaker 1>and maybe other I don't know how many.

0:46:08.160 --> 0:46:12.360
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, so Wranglers two, Lee is three, and and Levi's

0:46:12.360 --> 0:46:12.960
<v Speaker 13>is number one.

0:46:13.080 --> 0:46:16.279
<v Speaker 1>Okay, yeah, interesting, Okay, So what's the growth for I mean,

0:46:16.320 --> 0:46:18.160
<v Speaker 1>these are brands, as you said, around more than one

0:46:18.200 --> 0:46:20.880
<v Speaker 1>hundred years. How do you grow your brands? How do

0:46:20.960 --> 0:46:22.520
<v Speaker 1>you how does how does somebody do that?

0:46:22.560 --> 0:46:25.680
<v Speaker 13>In the stand it's new categories, new channels, new geographies,

0:46:25.680 --> 0:46:27.000
<v Speaker 13>and that's kind of what we've been doing.

0:46:27.280 --> 0:46:28.840
<v Speaker 10>So excuse me.

0:46:28.920 --> 0:46:30.759
<v Speaker 13>When we spun off from VF, we were kind of

0:46:30.840 --> 0:46:32.920
<v Speaker 13>landlocked in a couple of categories and channels because they

0:46:33.000 --> 0:46:35.319
<v Speaker 13>used us for a cash cow standpoint, And now we've

0:46:35.360 --> 0:46:38.360
<v Speaker 13>opened that up to across the globe, different channels and categories.

0:46:38.440 --> 0:46:40.759
<v Speaker 13>So we're selling the high end boutiques, you know, we're

0:46:40.800 --> 0:46:43.239
<v Speaker 13>selling to the Western group, we're selling in China. So

0:46:43.280 --> 0:46:45.839
<v Speaker 13>we're doing things like that and also creating new opportunities

0:46:45.880 --> 0:46:47.440
<v Speaker 13>like our outdoor line altering gear.

0:46:47.520 --> 0:46:49.680
<v Speaker 4>Who do you consider to be some of your rivals?

0:46:50.160 --> 0:46:52.480
<v Speaker 13>Oh, Levi's would be a rival of ours, But I

0:46:52.520 --> 0:46:55.600
<v Speaker 13>consider anybody that sells denim and or apparel arrival.

0:46:56.120 --> 0:47:00.799
<v Speaker 1>So, I mean, you know, I was on wallsterer for

0:47:00.800 --> 0:47:02.719
<v Speaker 1>thirty years. We're in a suit now this is a

0:47:02.840 --> 0:47:05.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, kind of a dress update for me having khakis.

0:47:05.560 --> 0:47:09.000
<v Speaker 1>How's the world changed in God's very academic changed for

0:47:09.040 --> 0:47:09.840
<v Speaker 1>you guys helping.

0:47:09.640 --> 0:47:10.000
<v Speaker 10>Me out out.

0:47:10.000 --> 0:47:12.200
<v Speaker 13>So the world has gotten extremely casual. And if you

0:47:12.200 --> 0:47:14.279
<v Speaker 13>see me today in a blazer and a pair of

0:47:14.560 --> 0:47:17.760
<v Speaker 13>pair of jeens, it's become the standard, you know, for everybody,

0:47:17.840 --> 0:47:19.839
<v Speaker 13>and it's allowed everywhere you go. You can wear this

0:47:19.880 --> 0:47:21.719
<v Speaker 13>to weddings, you can wear this to parties, you can

0:47:21.719 --> 0:47:23.640
<v Speaker 13>wear this to the theater. Didn't used to be able

0:47:23.680 --> 0:47:25.799
<v Speaker 13>to do it, but now it is totally acceptable.

0:47:26.520 --> 0:47:29.799
<v Speaker 4>As far as looking more ahead, what is your outlook

0:47:29.920 --> 0:47:32.120
<v Speaker 4>moving forward? For the company this year.

0:47:32.680 --> 0:47:34.920
<v Speaker 13>I think that we get through this little you know,

0:47:35.040 --> 0:47:37.319
<v Speaker 13>shock with the consumer right now. I think things will

0:47:37.320 --> 0:47:40.200
<v Speaker 13>get better with time. Interest rates will come down over time,

0:47:40.239 --> 0:47:42.359
<v Speaker 13>the consumer will be in a better place, and then

0:47:42.400 --> 0:47:44.799
<v Speaker 13>we'll continue to go ahead and do what we've been

0:47:44.800 --> 0:47:47.399
<v Speaker 13>doing as far as working through a very difficult time,

0:47:47.440 --> 0:47:48.439
<v Speaker 13>but in an elegant way.

0:47:48.600 --> 0:47:51.759
<v Speaker 4>From your perspective and how you're viewing things, all of

0:47:51.800 --> 0:47:54.440
<v Speaker 4>these recession calls with what you're doing with your business.

0:47:54.440 --> 0:47:56.920
<v Speaker 4>Do you think that's actually likely in the next couple

0:47:56.920 --> 0:47:57.520
<v Speaker 4>of quarters?

0:47:57.920 --> 0:47:59.480
<v Speaker 10>Could be? I do worry about it.

0:47:59.520 --> 0:48:01.080
<v Speaker 13>There's no quest about it. So yeah, I give it

0:48:01.120 --> 0:48:03.279
<v Speaker 13>a fifty to fifty chance that we could go there.

0:48:03.320 --> 0:48:05.680
<v Speaker 13>But for us, our product is used for work in

0:48:05.719 --> 0:48:08.080
<v Speaker 13>a very significant way, and right now, as you know,

0:48:08.160 --> 0:48:11.480
<v Speaker 13>unemployment is very good, especially in North America. So the

0:48:11.520 --> 0:48:13.799
<v Speaker 13>consumer uses our product for a workplace. So we sit

0:48:13.840 --> 0:48:16.440
<v Speaker 13>in a pretty good place and we're very value oriented.

0:48:16.560 --> 0:48:19.000
<v Speaker 13>You can buy our product at a very reasonable price,

0:48:19.160 --> 0:48:20.680
<v Speaker 13>and it's a trusted brand.

0:48:22.560 --> 0:48:24.640
<v Speaker 1>E commerce. How does that work for you? How does

0:48:24.640 --> 0:48:26.840
<v Speaker 1>that distribution channel work for you?

0:48:26.920 --> 0:48:29.799
<v Speaker 13>Big opportunity for us because we didn't capitalize on it

0:48:29.920 --> 0:48:31.560
<v Speaker 13>or spend any time and money on it when we

0:48:31.560 --> 0:48:33.600
<v Speaker 13>were part of another company. It's been part of our

0:48:33.640 --> 0:48:36.239
<v Speaker 13>strategic spin off move and we've been investing in it

0:48:36.239 --> 0:48:37.359
<v Speaker 13>heavily since the day we.

0:48:37.320 --> 0:48:38.799
<v Speaker 1>Spun When did you spend off?

0:48:38.840 --> 0:48:40.040
<v Speaker 10>Four years and one month ago?

0:48:40.239 --> 0:48:40.520
<v Speaker 5>Okay?

0:48:40.560 --> 0:48:41.600
<v Speaker 1>And why was that?

0:48:42.239 --> 0:48:44.640
<v Speaker 13>Wasn't part of the portfolio that the parent company wanted.

0:48:44.640 --> 0:48:47.040
<v Speaker 13>They wanted to focus on outdoor and action sports and

0:48:47.040 --> 0:48:48.840
<v Speaker 13>we weren't part of that, so we were a logical

0:48:48.840 --> 0:48:49.680
<v Speaker 13>spin Okay?

0:48:50.560 --> 0:48:52.759
<v Speaker 4>Is there We always like to talk about these. See

0:48:52.760 --> 0:48:55.200
<v Speaker 4>with McDonald's it has their fry indicators. One of their

0:48:55.239 --> 0:48:57.080
<v Speaker 4>last starting reports, they were talking about how not as

0:48:57.120 --> 0:49:00.000
<v Speaker 4>many people were adding that on to their meals planned.

0:49:00.080 --> 0:49:02.080
<v Speaker 4>I'm curious when it comes to denim, are there particular

0:49:02.120 --> 0:49:04.239
<v Speaker 4>indicators like you like to look at that can give

0:49:04.239 --> 0:49:04.960
<v Speaker 4>you a tell?

0:49:04.960 --> 0:49:05.239
<v Speaker 7>We do.

0:49:05.360 --> 0:49:08.520
<v Speaker 13>We love to look at share data, So NPD share

0:49:08.600 --> 0:49:11.640
<v Speaker 13>data for us is extremely important. Most of our retailers

0:49:12.320 --> 0:49:15.480
<v Speaker 13>are aligned and also are part of that process, so

0:49:15.520 --> 0:49:18.600
<v Speaker 13>we find out exactly what's rang through the register and

0:49:18.680 --> 0:49:20.840
<v Speaker 13>that is really important to us. In our share for

0:49:20.880 --> 0:49:23.200
<v Speaker 13>both brands has been growing significantly.

0:49:22.680 --> 0:49:25.080
<v Speaker 4>Interesting, Okay, So that would be an optimistic sign.

0:49:24.920 --> 0:49:27.719
<v Speaker 13>Right, very optimistic for us. Yes, and it's real data.

0:49:27.760 --> 0:49:28.520
<v Speaker 13>It's hard data.

0:49:28.840 --> 0:49:31.200
<v Speaker 1>Fourteen thou four hundred employees is what we have for you.

0:49:31.239 --> 0:49:31.520
<v Speaker 7>Guys.

0:49:31.840 --> 0:49:33.399
<v Speaker 1>Talk to us about the labor market for you. How

0:49:33.440 --> 0:49:36.440
<v Speaker 1>tough is it? How because we've heard from every CEO

0:49:36.480 --> 0:49:38.239
<v Speaker 1>and every line of business over the last several years,

0:49:38.360 --> 0:49:39.840
<v Speaker 1>really tough to get and keep good people.

0:49:39.920 --> 0:49:42.239
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, it's tough in certain areas. So it's tough in

0:49:42.440 --> 0:49:45.080
<v Speaker 13>our retail environment, in our stores, it's tough in distribution,

0:49:45.480 --> 0:49:47.960
<v Speaker 13>it's tough in it So there are pockets that are

0:49:47.960 --> 0:49:51.279
<v Speaker 13>tougher than others. But remember Warren Greensboro, North Carolina, one

0:49:51.280 --> 0:49:53.440
<v Speaker 13>of the biggest publicly traded companies. We've been there for

0:49:53.480 --> 0:49:56.040
<v Speaker 13>one hundred years. We have a very loyal base, and

0:49:56.080 --> 0:49:58.279
<v Speaker 13>we're a very good proposition for people that want to

0:49:58.320 --> 0:50:00.000
<v Speaker 13>work for a publicly traded big company.

0:50:00.040 --> 0:50:02.440
<v Speaker 10>But in Greensboro, right, and what.

0:50:02.400 --> 0:50:03.200
<v Speaker 1>Are the alternatives?

0:50:03.280 --> 0:50:05.520
<v Speaker 10>I mean there aren't. There aren't nearly as many as

0:50:05.520 --> 0:50:06.360
<v Speaker 10>some other large cities.

0:50:06.400 --> 0:50:06.480
<v Speaker 7>Ye.

0:50:06.560 --> 0:50:09.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, So you know you're sitting front of a

0:50:09.520 --> 0:50:11.560
<v Speaker 1>group of investors. What's the number one question you get

0:50:11.560 --> 0:50:12.080
<v Speaker 1>these days?

0:50:12.400 --> 0:50:14.479
<v Speaker 13>Mostly about whether we're going to go ahead and pop

0:50:14.520 --> 0:50:17.440
<v Speaker 13>into a recession or how are things going in China.

0:50:17.640 --> 0:50:19.399
<v Speaker 13>That's an example of two of the most recent ones.

0:50:19.480 --> 0:50:21.160
<v Speaker 1>How do you keep a pulse on China? Really?

0:50:21.239 --> 0:50:21.359
<v Speaker 6>Oh?

0:50:21.360 --> 0:50:23.680
<v Speaker 13>We have We have a sourcing office in Hong Kong,

0:50:23.719 --> 0:50:25.680
<v Speaker 13>and we have a front end office marketing, sales and

0:50:25.760 --> 0:50:28.920
<v Speaker 13>design in Shanghai. We have a leaders there, we have

0:50:28.960 --> 0:50:32.280
<v Speaker 13>a general manager. They report right into US, and we

0:50:32.480 --> 0:50:34.799
<v Speaker 13>travel and move back and forth with people. Were there

0:50:34.840 --> 0:50:36.120
<v Speaker 13>a lot and they come here a lot?

0:50:36.560 --> 0:50:37.960
<v Speaker 1>And Chinese like their denim.

0:50:38.160 --> 0:50:40.839
<v Speaker 13>Oh love it, absolutely love it. And it's and it's

0:50:40.840 --> 0:50:41.920
<v Speaker 13>a big marketplace too.

0:50:42.000 --> 0:50:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, it is a big I mean. And are

0:50:44.040 --> 0:50:45.439
<v Speaker 1>the local competitors there?

0:50:45.600 --> 0:50:45.759
<v Speaker 6>Oh?

0:50:45.800 --> 0:50:46.320
<v Speaker 10>Absolutely?

0:50:46.400 --> 0:50:49.759
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, yeah, local and also global, right, because everybody's in.

0:50:49.760 --> 0:50:53.120
<v Speaker 4>The market, right, So not just Texas with the wranglers, Paul, No.

0:50:53.040 --> 0:50:57.400
<v Speaker 1>I guess that's how watch that Yellowstone. Yes, all those

0:50:57.440 --> 0:50:58.560
<v Speaker 1>guys are wearing the ranguage.

0:50:58.719 --> 0:50:59.839
<v Speaker 10>Huge win for us.

0:51:00.160 --> 0:51:02.960
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, number one rated show on cable TV. Most of

0:51:03.000 --> 0:51:05.560
<v Speaker 13>the characters are wearing our product. But also the show

0:51:05.640 --> 0:51:08.560
<v Speaker 13>is centered around rodeos and the cowboy culture. Our brand

0:51:08.640 --> 0:51:11.000
<v Speaker 13>is in all those rodeo venues. You see our signs.

0:51:11.040 --> 0:51:13.960
<v Speaker 13>We've gotten advertising that way. But the single biggest win

0:51:14.040 --> 0:51:15.840
<v Speaker 13>for us is if you follow the show, you know

0:51:15.920 --> 0:51:19.200
<v Speaker 13>Landy Wilson's or country artists on there. Well, we just

0:51:19.239 --> 0:51:22.440
<v Speaker 13>signed her as our global spokesperson for women women Wrangler.

0:51:22.760 --> 0:51:27.720
<v Speaker 13>Huge wen for our first our first ever global spokesperson.

0:51:27.120 --> 0:51:30.760
<v Speaker 1>For really Brian a few years ago, and that's talented

0:51:30.800 --> 0:51:32.960
<v Speaker 1>and got back to the superstars. She's great. Scott Baxter,

0:51:33.040 --> 0:51:36.200
<v Speaker 1>thank you so much, CEO of Contour brands, Think Wrangler

0:51:36.239 --> 0:51:37.120
<v Speaker 1>and Lee gens Fro.

0:51:37.360 --> 0:51:40.440
<v Speaker 5>You're listening to the tape Cat's our live program Bloomberg

0:51:40.480 --> 0:51:44.080
<v Speaker 5>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:51:44.160 --> 0:51:46.120
<v Speaker 5>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and.

0:51:46.080 --> 0:51:47.400
<v Speaker 7>The Bloomberg Business App.

0:51:47.400 --> 0:51:50.239
<v Speaker 5>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:51:50.239 --> 0:51:55.240
<v Speaker 5>flagship New York station, Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:51:56.120 --> 0:51:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Let's continue our C suite conversations today. We're now we're

0:51:59.440 --> 0:52:03.280
<v Speaker 1>gonna talk about it, the distribution of electronics, huge huge business,

0:52:03.280 --> 0:52:06.239
<v Speaker 1>Global business. Sean Karens joins us. He's the CEO of

0:52:06.480 --> 0:52:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Arrow Electronics symbol a r W. The stock is up

0:52:11.719 --> 0:52:13.879
<v Speaker 1>thirty two percent year to date, up about one point

0:52:14.000 --> 0:52:17.960
<v Speaker 1>six percent today, all time high for the stock. Sean,

0:52:18.160 --> 0:52:21.560
<v Speaker 1>thanks so much for joining us. Why is ARW at

0:52:21.560 --> 0:52:22.680
<v Speaker 1>an all time high today?

0:52:23.760 --> 0:52:25.920
<v Speaker 14>Well, thank you, Paul, thanks for having me. You know,

0:52:26.000 --> 0:52:29.480
<v Speaker 14>i'd say that the long term outlook for electronics is

0:52:29.600 --> 0:52:32.960
<v Speaker 14>very promising. You know, not long ago, the use cases

0:52:32.960 --> 0:52:36.000
<v Speaker 14>for electronics were pretty narrow. It was things like compute,

0:52:36.560 --> 0:52:40.759
<v Speaker 14>maybe personal electronics including your smartphone. But today, you know,

0:52:40.800 --> 0:52:43.600
<v Speaker 14>we talk about the electrification of everything, and so you're

0:52:43.640 --> 0:52:48.640
<v Speaker 14>seeing all walks of life and homes, cars, factories, you

0:52:48.719 --> 0:52:51.720
<v Speaker 14>name it. They're all becoming electrified and they all require

0:52:52.040 --> 0:52:55.279
<v Speaker 14>more and more semiconductor and electronic technology.

0:52:55.480 --> 0:52:59.000
<v Speaker 4>So we like that Sean talk to us more about

0:52:59.080 --> 0:53:02.600
<v Speaker 4>what aero electronics does in your global reach.

0:53:04.200 --> 0:53:07.000
<v Speaker 14>So, Jess, we live in the middle of the electronics

0:53:07.000 --> 0:53:10.480
<v Speaker 14>and the information technology supply chain, which basically means we

0:53:10.520 --> 0:53:13.400
<v Speaker 14>help the makers of all those technologies get to market,

0:53:13.480 --> 0:53:19.880
<v Speaker 14>and then we help the commercial customers of those technologies design, build, supply,

0:53:20.680 --> 0:53:23.719
<v Speaker 14>and even manage the products that embed them. You know,

0:53:23.760 --> 0:53:25.319
<v Speaker 14>we like to say it Aro that if it takes

0:53:25.320 --> 0:53:28.840
<v Speaker 14>an electronic charge, we probably had something to do with

0:53:29.400 --> 0:53:31.920
<v Speaker 14>designing it, provisioning it, getting it to market.

0:53:33.160 --> 0:53:35.520
<v Speaker 1>So you know, whenever we talk to folks in a

0:53:35.680 --> 0:53:38.640
<v Speaker 1>technology supply chain, we have to just ask about the

0:53:38.719 --> 0:53:41.319
<v Speaker 1>chip business, where are we Are we back to quote

0:53:41.400 --> 0:53:43.600
<v Speaker 1>unquote normal in terms of the supply and demand of

0:53:43.680 --> 0:53:44.319
<v Speaker 1>chips out there.

0:53:45.440 --> 0:53:48.840
<v Speaker 14>You know, I'd say, Paul, the lead times are improving,

0:53:49.360 --> 0:53:52.520
<v Speaker 14>but we're certainly not back to pre pandemic levels. The

0:53:52.600 --> 0:53:55.759
<v Speaker 14>improvement has been fairly broad based, but there's still a

0:53:55.840 --> 0:54:00.600
<v Speaker 14>handful of categories that are in shorter supply in lies.

0:54:00.680 --> 0:54:03.000
<v Speaker 14>The you know, the golden screw dynamic that I'm sure

0:54:03.040 --> 0:54:06.560
<v Speaker 14>you've heard the industry talk about on many occasions.

0:54:06.160 --> 0:54:09.040
<v Speaker 4>When it comes to the different markets and industries that

0:54:09.160 --> 0:54:13.160
<v Speaker 4>your company is heavily involved in, which can you talk

0:54:13.200 --> 0:54:16.520
<v Speaker 4>more specifically if it's a automotive and and D industrials,

0:54:16.560 --> 0:54:19.200
<v Speaker 4>things like that, and how they're being impacted by the

0:54:19.239 --> 0:54:21.000
<v Speaker 4>trajectory of the economy.

0:54:22.160 --> 0:54:25.320
<v Speaker 14>So just I'd say the markets are broadly mixed, and

0:54:25.440 --> 0:54:28.200
<v Speaker 14>it does vary by region throughout the world, But you know,

0:54:28.280 --> 0:54:32.120
<v Speaker 14>we compete very heavily in the industrial markets, which means

0:54:32.640 --> 0:54:37.560
<v Speaker 14>you know, lots of manufacturing. We have significant exposure to

0:54:37.640 --> 0:54:41.280
<v Speaker 14>the automotive and transportation industries more broadly, and that obviously

0:54:41.360 --> 0:54:44.480
<v Speaker 14>puts us right in the middle of the transition to

0:54:44.840 --> 0:54:52.480
<v Speaker 14>electric vehicles. But we also participate in aerospace and defense, medical, compute,

0:54:53.239 --> 0:54:56.000
<v Speaker 14>and a good handful of others. And i'd say, you know,

0:54:56.040 --> 0:55:00.279
<v Speaker 14>we're seeing relative strength in industrial and automotive and maybe

0:55:00.280 --> 0:55:03.319
<v Speaker 14>aerospace and defense. They're faring better at the moment than

0:55:03.360 --> 0:55:07.719
<v Speaker 14>what we see happening in the world of compute, communications, infrastructure,

0:55:08.120 --> 0:55:10.600
<v Speaker 14>you know, mobility, and even things related to the Internet

0:55:10.600 --> 0:55:14.040
<v Speaker 14>of Things. I think those demand trends are temporary. I

0:55:14.040 --> 0:55:16.479
<v Speaker 14>think again, the long term outlook is going to get better.

0:55:17.360 --> 0:55:20.000
<v Speaker 1>So you know, we can't talk to anybody again within

0:55:20.040 --> 0:55:23.200
<v Speaker 1>the technology stack without talking about AI, because it seems

0:55:23.200 --> 0:55:25.520
<v Speaker 1>like every company in the world feels like they're a

0:55:25.560 --> 0:55:29.960
<v Speaker 1>play on AI. But how does artificial intelligence impact you,

0:55:29.960 --> 0:55:32.680
<v Speaker 1>your business, your outlook, your customers. How do you guys

0:55:32.680 --> 0:55:33.239
<v Speaker 1>think about that?

0:55:34.320 --> 0:55:37.799
<v Speaker 14>So, like most companies were paying very close attention to it,

0:55:37.960 --> 0:55:40.880
<v Speaker 14>I'd say we're in the early days of the hype cycle,

0:55:41.360 --> 0:55:45.120
<v Speaker 14>as with many other big tech transitions you know, throughout history.

0:55:45.960 --> 0:55:48.840
<v Speaker 14>But there's no doubt it represents a compelling opportunity for

0:55:48.960 --> 0:55:50.719
<v Speaker 14>us and for the industry, And so we think about

0:55:50.760 --> 0:55:53.680
<v Speaker 14>it on two fronts. One is internal because it will

0:55:53.719 --> 0:55:57.000
<v Speaker 14>certainly help, you know, help us redefine work and workload

0:55:57.080 --> 0:56:00.520
<v Speaker 14>and streamline a lot of processes that today you know,

0:56:00.880 --> 0:56:05.440
<v Speaker 14>require lots and lots of effort. But more importantly, I think,

0:56:05.840 --> 0:56:08.480
<v Speaker 14>you know, as we speak, there's a whole ecosystem developing

0:56:08.520 --> 0:56:12.719
<v Speaker 14>around AI and generative AI, and so back to you know,

0:56:12.800 --> 0:56:15.279
<v Speaker 14>our role in the middle of the you know, the

0:56:15.320 --> 0:56:18.160
<v Speaker 14>electronics and the IT supply chain. We're going to help

0:56:18.160 --> 0:56:21.360
<v Speaker 14>bring that ecosystem to life and will help the makers

0:56:21.360 --> 0:56:23.759
<v Speaker 14>of all those related technologies get to market. And so

0:56:24.400 --> 0:56:26.680
<v Speaker 14>we think it's just one more of the bigger demand

0:56:26.760 --> 0:56:29.279
<v Speaker 14>trends that you know, make the long term outlook as

0:56:29.320 --> 0:56:30.200
<v Speaker 14>promising as it is.

0:56:30.920 --> 0:56:34.120
<v Speaker 4>This bounce back that we've been seeing more broadly in

0:56:34.280 --> 0:56:37.120
<v Speaker 4>chip stocks this year. Looking at the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index

0:56:37.160 --> 0:56:41.480
<v Speaker 4>ticker Symbole Socks SOX, that's a paul almost fifty percent.

0:56:41.520 --> 0:56:43.719
<v Speaker 4>It's a forty six percent year to date after that

0:56:43.800 --> 0:56:48.200
<v Speaker 4>index lost clover thirty five percent last year. So sean

0:56:48.280 --> 0:56:51.799
<v Speaker 4>from your view, and obviously given a large part of

0:56:51.840 --> 0:56:55.000
<v Speaker 4>your business is tied to obviously the design and building

0:56:55.080 --> 0:56:58.480
<v Speaker 4>of these chips and it comes to the semiconductor sector,

0:56:58.560 --> 0:57:01.320
<v Speaker 4>what's your tell and you're reading on what this means

0:57:01.320 --> 0:57:03.960
<v Speaker 4>for the global economy, because if you see ship makers

0:57:03.960 --> 0:57:06.040
<v Speaker 4>performing well like this, wouldn't that be more of an

0:57:06.040 --> 0:57:06.920
<v Speaker 4>optimistic sign?

0:57:08.040 --> 0:57:09.919
<v Speaker 14>You know, I would tend to agree with you. We've

0:57:09.960 --> 0:57:13.000
<v Speaker 14>been you know, talking amongst ourselves for some time now

0:57:13.000 --> 0:57:15.200
<v Speaker 14>that we're you know, there's an argument to be made

0:57:15.200 --> 0:57:17.840
<v Speaker 14>for a softer landing. As you might know, there's a

0:57:17.880 --> 0:57:21.640
<v Speaker 14>cyclical nature to this industry, and so when demand is strong,

0:57:21.920 --> 0:57:24.360
<v Speaker 14>you know, supply rants up to serve it, and that

0:57:24.440 --> 0:57:27.480
<v Speaker 14>all works great until demand softens and that leads to

0:57:28.320 --> 0:57:31.080
<v Speaker 14>you know, a build up of inventory throughout the industry

0:57:31.120 --> 0:57:32.680
<v Speaker 14>that takes a little bit of time to sell through.

0:57:33.280 --> 0:57:35.160
<v Speaker 14>I'd say the industry is right in the middle of

0:57:35.200 --> 0:57:40.040
<v Speaker 14>that now. However, you know, backlogs are still fairly significant

0:57:40.120 --> 0:57:43.360
<v Speaker 14>due to all the shortages over the past couple of years,

0:57:43.400 --> 0:57:46.680
<v Speaker 14>and I'd say demand has softened, but it's not you know,

0:57:46.760 --> 0:57:49.000
<v Speaker 14>falling sharply. You know, I think we're in the midst

0:57:49.000 --> 0:57:51.960
<v Speaker 14>of a market that's moving sideways, and hence we sort

0:57:51.960 --> 0:57:54.600
<v Speaker 14>of feel like, you know, a software landing is in store,

0:57:54.640 --> 0:57:57.640
<v Speaker 14>and I think, you know, the market is probably reflecting that.

0:57:58.800 --> 0:58:01.000
<v Speaker 1>So shaw I see aout a third of your revenue

0:58:01.040 --> 0:58:04.200
<v Speaker 1>comes from Asia, Pacific. I don't know what's your exposure

0:58:04.200 --> 0:58:07.120
<v Speaker 1>to China, what's your either as a customer or supplier,

0:58:07.160 --> 0:58:08.560
<v Speaker 1>and how are you guys dealing with that.

0:58:09.840 --> 0:58:13.000
<v Speaker 14>Well, we serve the Asia Pacific market, of which you know,

0:58:13.120 --> 0:58:16.440
<v Speaker 14>China is the biggest piece. Like in the West, we

0:58:16.520 --> 0:58:20.920
<v Speaker 14>tend to focus on the transportation and industrial markets and

0:58:20.960 --> 0:58:24.840
<v Speaker 14>so you know, demand in China is software at the moment,

0:58:24.960 --> 0:58:27.320
<v Speaker 14>but you know, we do anticipate that that will improve

0:58:27.360 --> 0:58:28.640
<v Speaker 14>at some point in the near future.

0:58:30.080 --> 0:58:30.320
<v Speaker 7>You know.

0:58:30.360 --> 0:58:32.680
<v Speaker 14>We we like that market, we like our position in

0:58:32.720 --> 0:58:36.080
<v Speaker 14>that market, and we think that there's still a lot

0:58:36.120 --> 0:58:38.880
<v Speaker 14>of good opportunity for us in store. Having said that,

0:58:38.920 --> 0:58:42.280
<v Speaker 14>we're a global company and we have lots of relative

0:58:42.320 --> 0:58:46.400
<v Speaker 14>strength throughout the West. So regardless of how the you know,

0:58:46.440 --> 0:58:49.920
<v Speaker 14>the semiconductor industry shakes out, I think we're well positioned

0:58:50.920 --> 0:58:53.200
<v Speaker 14>regardless of how that how that looks.

0:58:53.360 --> 0:58:56.920
<v Speaker 4>When we have about twenty seconds left. Other areas in

0:58:56.960 --> 0:59:00.360
<v Speaker 4>the global economy that you want to push into, well.

0:59:00.240 --> 0:59:03.760
<v Speaker 14>We certainly like all the trends in transportation and industrial

0:59:03.840 --> 0:59:09.320
<v Speaker 14>and medical as I mentioned, we certainly see great opportunities

0:59:09.400 --> 0:59:13.920
<v Speaker 14>in our IT business for the notion of information technology

0:59:13.960 --> 0:59:16.320
<v Speaker 14>as a service and We're certainly going to play an

0:59:16.320 --> 0:59:19.440
<v Speaker 14>important role in helping you know, customers benefit from it.

0:59:19.880 --> 0:59:21.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, Hey, Shan, thanks so much for taking the

0:59:21.680 --> 0:59:23.960
<v Speaker 1>time to check in with us. Sean Karns, he's the

0:59:24.000 --> 0:59:28.360
<v Speaker 1>CEO of Arrow Electronics, the New York Stock Exchange. Tickers

0:59:28.440 --> 0:59:31.760
<v Speaker 1>a RW to put into your Bloomberg terminal, and what

0:59:31.840 --> 0:59:34.520
<v Speaker 1>you'll find when you put up the prices stocks an

0:59:34.640 --> 0:59:38.080
<v Speaker 1>all time Hi, so participating in that tech move.

0:59:40.040 --> 0:59:43.120
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can

0:59:43.160 --> 0:59:47.360
<v Speaker 2>subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever.

0:59:47.040 --> 0:59:49.720
<v Speaker 1>Podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller.

0:59:49.960 --> 0:59:52.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm on Twitter at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three.

0:59:53.360 --> 0:59:55.720
<v Speaker 1>And I'm Faull Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:59:55.840 --> 0:59:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at

0:59:58.520 --> 0:59:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio.