WEBVTT - 5/17, Part 1: FAABAGANZA, Waiver Wire, Florio Friday

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune in app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you could listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on Twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:25.079
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess Fantasy Sports Network. You'll find

0:00:25.160 --> 0:00:30.520
<v Speaker 1>us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening. You're

0:00:30.640 --> 0:00:39.479
<v Speaker 1>listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network Fantasy best Friends Forever.

0:00:50.000 --> 0:00:55.000
<v Speaker 1>To Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do

0:00:55.280 --> 0:01:04.839
<v Speaker 1>Do Do? Yeah, Yes, the Fantasy best Friends Forever. Here

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy Sports Radio Network alongside Frankie Stanford. I am

0:01:08.920 --> 0:01:12.240
<v Speaker 1>Greg Souman joined today as we are when he feels

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:15.039
<v Speaker 1>like being here. It's Mike Gloria. What's going on? Mike?

0:01:16.959 --> 0:01:20.680
<v Speaker 1>I missed one week. One week, that's it and great.

0:01:20.760 --> 0:01:23.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry for the shadows. I bought some lights. I'm

0:01:23.720 --> 0:01:26.080
<v Speaker 1>trying to make it better. But I was in like

0:01:26.160 --> 0:01:28.880
<v Speaker 1>an hour of l A traffic before coming on the show,

0:01:29.000 --> 0:01:31.680
<v Speaker 1>so I got home with like five minutes before, so

0:01:31.800 --> 0:01:34.320
<v Speaker 1>I couldn't really get rid of the shadows too much.

0:01:34.680 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Here uh here, like traffic is very terrible, dude. I

0:01:38.400 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 1>had to go like ten miles. It took me over

0:01:40.240 --> 0:01:43.160
<v Speaker 1>an hour. Oh my god's harriful, Frank, I don't know.

0:01:43.240 --> 0:01:46.120
<v Speaker 1>You don't you lose it, man, I would listen to

0:01:46.160 --> 0:01:48.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of podcasts. I guess that's that's the best

0:01:48.720 --> 0:01:50.520
<v Speaker 1>way to look at it. But Mikey, how does it

0:01:50.560 --> 0:01:53.080
<v Speaker 1>compare to you know, do you really miss the R

0:01:53.160 --> 0:01:57.560
<v Speaker 1>train here? Do you really miss public transportation? I do

0:01:57.640 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 1>not miss the train at all, um I do. I

0:02:01.840 --> 0:02:04.600
<v Speaker 1>don't know. New York traffic is pretty bad itself, but

0:02:04.680 --> 0:02:07.120
<v Speaker 1>it's just l A is the worst I've ever experienced.

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:09.079
<v Speaker 1>But luckily for me, and I feel like a lot

0:02:09.080 --> 0:02:11.280
<v Speaker 1>of people out here, like you try your best to

0:02:11.400 --> 0:02:15.200
<v Speaker 1>not have to get on the highway, so I typically

0:02:15.480 --> 0:02:17.480
<v Speaker 1>do a good job of avoiding it, but today it

0:02:17.520 --> 0:02:20.000
<v Speaker 1>was just inevitable. I've been on that highway to when

0:02:20.000 --> 0:02:21.960
<v Speaker 1>I was in l A. It's like it's like six

0:02:22.080 --> 0:02:25.800
<v Speaker 1>or eight lanes wide right, Like it's it's absolutely insane. Yeah,

0:02:25.800 --> 0:02:27.919
<v Speaker 1>the four oh five. Luckily I wasn't on that today.

0:02:27.960 --> 0:02:30.239
<v Speaker 1>I was. I was coming back from downtown l A.

0:02:30.360 --> 0:02:33.959
<v Speaker 1>But yeah, the four oh five is is atrocious. Wild

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:36.520
<v Speaker 1>are you doing, but had you sleep? It's great, man,

0:02:36.680 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 1>sounds really good. It's not pretty good, toothing. What it was.

0:02:39.639 --> 0:02:42.359
<v Speaker 1>I was watching Curry versus Curry, which is tons of fun,

0:02:42.960 --> 0:02:45.679
<v Speaker 1>tons of fun, and the game ended and I was

0:02:45.720 --> 0:02:47.639
<v Speaker 1>just really choked that one away and went to bed.

0:02:47.639 --> 0:02:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Woke up to some panic text messages about six fourteen,

0:02:50.560 --> 0:02:54.239
<v Speaker 1>sorry six so nine this morning? What panic text messages?

0:02:54.240 --> 0:02:56.600
<v Speaker 1>I didn't even know what happened here? What? Yeah, so

0:02:56.840 --> 0:02:58.840
<v Speaker 1>you don't fill me in on anything anymore. I'm supposed

0:02:58.840 --> 0:03:01.000
<v Speaker 1>to be Greg's right hand man. The guy didn't tell

0:03:01.040 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>me anything, right, you don't want to know anything. You

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:05.600
<v Speaker 1>don't want you don't want to deal with You don't

0:03:05.600 --> 0:03:09.000
<v Speaker 1>want to deal with anything. Sometimes I gotta know, though, Yeah,

0:03:09.200 --> 0:03:10.760
<v Speaker 1>you just leave me in the darks. So today there's

0:03:10.760 --> 0:03:14.520
<v Speaker 1>a miscommunication. So Bavona is gone. Floria is getting married

0:03:14.520 --> 0:03:18.160
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday. So yeah, he's not here. You can't hear you.

0:03:18.480 --> 0:03:22.760
<v Speaker 1>So we'll send that to him. So the person that

0:03:22.840 --> 0:03:25.640
<v Speaker 1>was replacing him, he had told us we I thought

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:28.720
<v Speaker 1>he'd be here today and not Monday and Tuesday. So

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I had a contingency for Monday and Tuesday. How you

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:33.760
<v Speaker 1>would fill it in but we had misread the email.

0:03:34.120 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 1>He will be here Monday. He was not here today

0:03:36.400 --> 0:03:40.640
<v Speaker 1>or Tuesday, so there was no here. There was nobody here,

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 1>So thankfully Bryan steff Dutt was able to handle things

0:03:44.640 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>a little bit late. But there's nobody here early this

0:03:48.280 --> 0:03:51.000
<v Speaker 1>morning and things were a bit of a crap show

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:54.840
<v Speaker 1>early this morning. Here. We should have had Florida. He

0:03:54.880 --> 0:03:56.480
<v Speaker 1>still knows how to do some things right. It was

0:03:56.560 --> 0:04:00.720
<v Speaker 1>like three am Florida time. Oh gosh, I was not awake,

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 1>but I do not miss Greggy. I don't know if

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 1>you remember Thanksgiving like I think it was. I do.

0:04:06.320 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>I do Everythingksgiving Floria. So yeah, I remember, I got

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>the show started. I think it's seven am. I will

0:04:11.800 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 1>get it like six. They were out. They were that,

0:04:16.320 --> 0:04:21.839
<v Speaker 1>that's a fact. This weekends about to get crazy. It's

0:04:21.839 --> 0:04:29.120
<v Speaker 1>about to get crazy. Whatever you want it. So fabigedd Fabinado.

0:04:29.200 --> 0:04:34.880
<v Speaker 1>I like Fabinado podcast yesterday, fabric gedding. Yeah, so all

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:38.520
<v Speaker 1>those very dumb right, so very very dumb because we're like, oh,

0:04:38.560 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 1>it's you're never the world faber like all right, enough

0:04:42.200 --> 0:04:46.360
<v Speaker 1>fabric gedd in, enough Fabinado, enough, wait till you hear

0:04:46.360 --> 0:04:48.800
<v Speaker 1>what this guy came up with, Mike, do you realize

0:04:48.839 --> 0:04:52.160
<v Speaker 1>what today's show is going to be? Florio? What is it?

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:56.159
<v Speaker 1>Tune this in Alex here we go. This is a

0:04:56.200 --> 0:05:00.280
<v Speaker 1>fab you Looso show is what this is? This show

0:05:00.960 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 1>is fave you low soo. Did you go this morning

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:13.400
<v Speaker 1>and buy that? No, we had it as a fabuloso show.

0:05:13.480 --> 0:05:15.600
<v Speaker 1>There's people looking inside the studio like, why the hell

0:05:15.680 --> 0:05:18.599
<v Speaker 1>is this guy holding up a bottle of fabuloso? Actually,

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 1>I actually know that person. Really look at you, Mr Popular?

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:28.839
<v Speaker 1>What is fabuloso? Use it to clean long lasting fragrance.

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:32.080
<v Speaker 1>That's what it says on the bottle, Lavender, fresco lavanda.

0:05:32.160 --> 0:05:34.560
<v Speaker 1>It is long last thing that's going to help your

0:05:34.560 --> 0:05:37.360
<v Speaker 1>fantasy team in a long lasting way. You're not gonna

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>waste your money on a carner Keyboon who didn't help

0:05:40.600 --> 0:05:45.280
<v Speaker 1>your fantasy team with our fab you know, But we're

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:50.839
<v Speaker 1>gonna help fantasy owners with their fabue Loso weekends. Big.

0:05:50.839 --> 0:05:53.159
<v Speaker 1>Here's what I will say. I'm really excited about this

0:05:53.200 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 1>weekend because I'm very confident that at least three or

0:05:57.120 --> 0:05:59.640
<v Speaker 1>four other teams are going to get down to my

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 1>love fab and that makes me happy, Like there's gonna

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:05.600
<v Speaker 1>be there's gonna be three or four teams that's been

0:06:05.640 --> 0:06:08.680
<v Speaker 1>like over three dollars this weekend in the main Event

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:11.000
<v Speaker 1>or in the Great Fantasy Based Limitational, and it will

0:06:11.000 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>all be under two hundred dollars FAB for the rest

0:06:13.320 --> 0:06:15.560
<v Speaker 1>of the season together. And that will make me feel

0:06:15.560 --> 0:06:17.400
<v Speaker 1>a little bit better, although I will not have any

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:19.640
<v Speaker 1>of these prospects on my team, which makes me a

0:06:19.720 --> 0:06:23.360
<v Speaker 1>little sad. But I have you what's up, Mike? So

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:25.479
<v Speaker 1>you said you're under two d and FAB right in

0:06:25.480 --> 0:06:29.560
<v Speaker 1>those leagues? Are you going to put every dollar you

0:06:29.600 --> 0:06:31.440
<v Speaker 1>have on these players and hope that you get one?

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:33.839
<v Speaker 1>I can't because in the main event there are no

0:06:33.960 --> 0:06:38.159
<v Speaker 1>zero dollar bids, So I kind of like I have

0:06:38.240 --> 0:06:39.920
<v Speaker 1>to be prudent here. I gotta I gotta figure out

0:06:40.000 --> 0:06:41.760
<v Speaker 1>what to do. I have one seventy nine in the

0:06:41.760 --> 0:06:43.760
<v Speaker 1>main Event, and I have too twenty one and the

0:06:43.760 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>Great Fantasy Baseball Invitational, and there are no zero zero

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:49.760
<v Speaker 1>dollar bids a loot in each of these, so ills

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 1>in let me look, it's more than likely that I'm

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:53.840
<v Speaker 1>not gonna end up. These guys are that we're gonna

0:06:53.839 --> 0:06:55.440
<v Speaker 1>talk about, are gonna go for more money than I

0:06:55.480 --> 0:06:58.240
<v Speaker 1>even have left so I realized that I'm gonna still

0:06:58.240 --> 0:07:01.360
<v Speaker 1>have bids in on like Nicky Lopez, Oscar Mercado, probably

0:07:01.360 --> 0:07:04.840
<v Speaker 1>nothing to you, which means that I'm probably just not

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:06.800
<v Speaker 1>gonna get any of these guys. And it's all right,

0:07:06.880 --> 0:07:09.960
<v Speaker 1>Like my team is performing now knock on wood, so

0:07:10.400 --> 0:07:12.120
<v Speaker 1>even without Aaron Judge. So we'll see if we can

0:07:12.200 --> 0:07:14.600
<v Speaker 1>keep it up. But overall, I'm not really expecting to

0:07:14.600 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>win a lot of these prospects here. That doesn't mean

0:07:16.760 --> 0:07:18.400
<v Speaker 1>everyone else can't go out there and win them. And

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:22.320
<v Speaker 1>that's basically what we're here today to do. Greggy absolutely absolutely.

0:07:22.400 --> 0:07:27.840
<v Speaker 1>And so last night in my league, not enough people

0:07:27.840 --> 0:07:30.040
<v Speaker 1>paying attention. So the people that I thought would get

0:07:30.160 --> 0:07:34.720
<v Speaker 1>here and get Riley get people that we're not paying

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>attention did it. So my league not helpful for you

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:39.960
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to fab, but we want to be

0:07:40.240 --> 0:07:43.120
<v Speaker 1>more helpful. So we heard yesterday from you, Frank and

0:07:43.160 --> 0:07:44.960
<v Speaker 1>how much you were going to bid all these guys

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:47.960
<v Speaker 1>here and Riley Um and Nicky Lopez and more and

0:07:48.000 --> 0:07:50.520
<v Speaker 1>Brendan Rodgers potentially. But Flora, I want to get your

0:07:50.560 --> 0:07:52.680
<v Speaker 1>Ranki's I know they're inside your Patreon page, but you

0:07:52.720 --> 0:07:55.440
<v Speaker 1>can help us out. What are your rankings on these

0:07:55.440 --> 0:07:58.800
<v Speaker 1>guys are like fabulous of Friday. So to me, I

0:07:58.800 --> 0:08:01.720
<v Speaker 1>think Mercado was last. I think that's an easy one.

0:08:02.880 --> 0:08:05.840
<v Speaker 1>I think Nicky Lopez is next. I just don't I

0:08:05.880 --> 0:08:08.320
<v Speaker 1>like Nicky Lopez. I think he's the safest of all

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:10.400
<v Speaker 1>these prospects, but I don't think he has the upside

0:08:10.400 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 1>of the other four. So I couldn't I actually couldn't

0:08:12.400 --> 0:08:14.880
<v Speaker 1>agree more like he's playing time security. He was brought

0:08:14.920 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 1>up for the Royals though for any injury. He was

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:18.720
<v Speaker 1>brought up because it's time to bring him up, time

0:08:18.720 --> 0:08:20.520
<v Speaker 1>to let him play, and time to just get better.

0:08:20.520 --> 0:08:23.440
<v Speaker 1>He made him right the twos at second base and

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 1>moves with Maryfield for him. Put him at second base,

0:08:26.320 --> 0:08:29.040
<v Speaker 1>that middle infield combo with Albert Jomond to see Nicky Lopez,

0:08:29.080 --> 0:08:31.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean that is the combo for the future, ideally

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:34.040
<v Speaker 1>for the Kansas City Royals. So I could not agree

0:08:34.120 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>anymore with you thus far, Floria that he's driving safe.

0:08:37.559 --> 0:08:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think he's upside both power and speed. I

0:08:39.840 --> 0:08:42.079
<v Speaker 1>think he could be a good average hitter, and I

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:44.400
<v Speaker 1>think he'll healthier fantasy teams, but he won't light the

0:08:44.440 --> 0:08:47.719
<v Speaker 1>world out of fire. Yeah, I agree with that, and

0:08:48.000 --> 0:08:50.560
<v Speaker 1>also like the Royals aren't competing. That's another thing I

0:08:50.559 --> 0:08:53.280
<v Speaker 1>always I like to factor in UH. And after that,

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:56.680
<v Speaker 1>I think the next four, depending on who you ask,

0:08:56.720 --> 0:08:59.560
<v Speaker 1>you might get different answers. To me, my personal favorite

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:03.040
<v Speaker 1>of them is Brendan Rodgers. Uh. He plays a premium position,

0:09:03.160 --> 0:09:06.080
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna have short stup and second base eligibility, He's

0:09:06.120 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>going to be in the Rockies lineup, get half his

0:09:08.840 --> 0:09:12.440
<v Speaker 1>games at course field. Plus. To me, I think there's

0:09:12.480 --> 0:09:15.840
<v Speaker 1>really no threat at stealing his job, at least initially.

0:09:15.880 --> 0:09:18.160
<v Speaker 1>Like I don't think he's gonna get Carter Key Boom, Like,

0:09:18.360 --> 0:09:20.000
<v Speaker 1>all right, he had a bad three weeks, let's send

0:09:20.080 --> 0:09:23.959
<v Speaker 1>him down. Because Garrett Hampson has done nothing to warrant,

0:09:24.000 --> 0:09:26.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, taking that job away. Neither has Ryan McMahon,

0:09:26.679 --> 0:09:29.120
<v Speaker 1>and they both have had McMann has had shots in

0:09:29.120 --> 0:09:31.840
<v Speaker 1>the past as well. So I think Brendan Rodgers is

0:09:31.880 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 1>my favorite just because the premium position and the course field.

0:09:36.040 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 1>I would put Austin Riley I think a second, But man,

0:09:40.000 --> 0:09:42.360
<v Speaker 1>it's it's close between all of these guys, and I

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:44.840
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of it when you're I spoke about

0:09:44.880 --> 0:09:47.440
<v Speaker 1>this on my podcast when you're deciding on which order

0:09:47.440 --> 0:09:49.320
<v Speaker 1>you want to put these guys in. To me, a

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:51.240
<v Speaker 1>lot of it comes down to what positions you need.

0:09:51.320 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Because if you need a middle infielder, all right, and

0:09:54.200 --> 0:09:56.520
<v Speaker 1>maybe I'll go with Brandon Rodgers over Austin Riley. But

0:09:56.600 --> 0:09:58.920
<v Speaker 1>if I really need, say a third baseman or an outfielder,

0:09:58.960 --> 0:10:01.720
<v Speaker 1>then I'm boosting up Willie Calhoun and Austin Riley. So

0:10:02.040 --> 0:10:04.679
<v Speaker 1>to me, I think those four guys are all very close.

0:10:04.760 --> 0:10:07.319
<v Speaker 1>I have Brendan Rodgers is my personal favorite, then with

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the with the Riley second, but I think all and

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:13.839
<v Speaker 1>I think Calhoun doesn't have the ceiling of the other guys,

0:10:13.840 --> 0:10:16.320
<v Speaker 1>but he's not off by much. I just think the

0:10:16.360 --> 0:10:18.760
<v Speaker 1>other guys there's a little bit more hype around them

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 1>because we haven't seen them fail at the major league

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:23.080
<v Speaker 1>level yet. But I think all four of them deserve

0:10:23.200 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 1>to go in the same range. And I think in

0:10:25.400 --> 0:10:28.040
<v Speaker 1>in leagues like the Great Fantasy Baseball Invitational and the

0:10:28.320 --> 0:10:30.599
<v Speaker 1>and like NBC Main Events or anything any league with

0:10:30.679 --> 0:10:34.560
<v Speaker 1>an overall fift team league, I think is what these

0:10:34.559 --> 0:10:36.319
<v Speaker 1>guys are gonna cost. Yeah, I think that makes a

0:10:36.360 --> 0:10:38.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of sense, and I'll actually take it one step further.

0:10:38.320 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 1>Based on what Mike said, it's not just positional need

0:10:40.559 --> 0:10:43.760
<v Speaker 1>what you need, I think you look at statistical need too.

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>So if you need power, I think Austin Riley is

0:10:46.400 --> 0:10:48.200
<v Speaker 1>probably your guy. If you need a little bit of

0:10:48.240 --> 0:10:50.240
<v Speaker 1>everything on the offensive side, then you're probably looking at

0:10:50.280 --> 0:10:52.680
<v Speaker 1>a guy like Kess and Hero or even Brendan Rodgers,

0:10:52.679 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 1>who I think might be able to hit for decent

0:10:54.559 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>batting average, a little bit of pop. Obviously playing in

0:10:56.559 --> 0:10:59.559
<v Speaker 1>Coors Field in Colorado, he sold twelve basses last year,

0:10:59.559 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 1>so gives you a little bit of everything. So I

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:06.160
<v Speaker 1>think statistical need is another factor into this. Greg. If

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:08.080
<v Speaker 1>you just need speed, then maybe you're a little bit

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 1>more aggressive on Oscar Mercado. So I think not only

0:11:11.080 --> 0:11:12.920
<v Speaker 1>is the positional need, I do agree with that that

0:11:13.040 --> 0:11:14.720
<v Speaker 1>is obviously going to play a big factor into who

0:11:14.720 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 1>you're bidding on this weekend, but I think what stats

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:21.400
<v Speaker 1>you need also factored into which players you're bidding on here, Greg, yes,

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:24.480
<v Speaker 1>if you need pictures. Last week and NFBC Corbyn Martin

0:11:24.520 --> 0:11:27.720
<v Speaker 1>wasn't available yet because he has to at least play

0:11:27.720 --> 0:11:30.080
<v Speaker 1>in one game before he's available, so he was available

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 1>the next day on Monday because he made his start

0:11:32.240 --> 0:11:35.080
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday, but he wasn't available that night. So that's

0:11:35.120 --> 0:11:38.319
<v Speaker 1>another factor into this. If you need pitching, then maybe

0:11:38.320 --> 0:11:41.040
<v Speaker 1>you're really really aggressive on Corbyn Martin even ahead of

0:11:41.080 --> 0:11:42.839
<v Speaker 1>some of these hitters. It really comes down to what

0:11:42.920 --> 0:11:45.079
<v Speaker 1>you need for your team, Greg. Of course, it is

0:11:45.120 --> 0:11:47.079
<v Speaker 1>do you need do you need power? Do you need speed?

0:11:47.080 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 1>Do you need middle in field? Do you need outfield?

0:11:48.840 --> 0:11:51.240
<v Speaker 1>You need a corner in field? That those are the

0:11:51.320 --> 0:11:55.079
<v Speaker 1>questions you have to ask yourselves. Oh, almost like a

0:11:55.200 --> 0:11:57.640
<v Speaker 1>draft rank. And I know you put a lot going

0:11:57.679 --> 0:12:04.200
<v Speaker 1>into the draft on position scarcity. Position eligibility doesn't matter, right, Like,

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:07.840
<v Speaker 1>if you believe Austin Riley is the best is the

0:12:07.880 --> 0:12:10.679
<v Speaker 1>best hitter out of any of these guys, don't you

0:12:10.720 --> 0:12:12.800
<v Speaker 1>just grow out and grab him and then worry about

0:12:12.800 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 1>the rest of it later, not necessarily think Okay, I

0:12:17.600 --> 0:12:20.040
<v Speaker 1>think if you truly believe he is head and shoulders

0:12:20.080 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 1>above the I don't I think all four of these

0:12:22.120 --> 0:12:26.120
<v Speaker 1>guys are very close. And those four again, Flora, Uh,

0:12:26.160 --> 0:12:30.840
<v Speaker 1>it's it's Willie Calhoun, Austin Riley, Brendan Rodgers and Keston Ira.

0:12:30.920 --> 0:12:35.200
<v Speaker 1>I always struggle to say his I listened to the

0:12:35.240 --> 0:12:37.200
<v Speaker 1>audio from the minor leagues and they were saying the

0:12:37.240 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 1>eye before it, So I that's that's how I've been

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 1>saying it. I could be wrong. I'm not saying I'm

0:12:42.920 --> 0:12:44.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm right. I struggle with that guy's name. But to me,

0:12:45.000 --> 0:12:48.440
<v Speaker 1>those four are all very very close together. They're they're

0:12:48.520 --> 0:12:51.679
<v Speaker 1>very similar. They have sky high upside. I think a

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:54.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of them, outside of Willie Calhoun do have to

0:12:54.040 --> 0:12:56.720
<v Speaker 1>worry because they're they're on teams that are looking to

0:12:56.760 --> 0:12:59.199
<v Speaker 1>compete this year. That's why I think Brendon Rogers though,

0:12:59.240 --> 0:13:02.880
<v Speaker 1>because the position competition is less, Like I'm not, let's

0:13:02.880 --> 0:13:05.400
<v Speaker 1>not fully discount Travis Shaw and Enter and c RT

0:13:05.559 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 1>being somewhat of competition for those other guys. So that's

0:13:08.520 --> 0:13:10.840
<v Speaker 1>why I have Brendan Rodgers one. But if you truly

0:13:10.880 --> 0:13:13.960
<v Speaker 1>believe Greg that Austin Riley he's the can't miss guy here,

0:13:14.120 --> 0:13:15.720
<v Speaker 1>then yes, I think you do need to pay up

0:13:15.720 --> 0:13:19.240
<v Speaker 1>to get your guy. When Mike breaks it down like that,

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:21.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it makes sense. But I think from my

0:13:21.880 --> 0:13:24.720
<v Speaker 1>perspective and just looking into all these prospects, I don't

0:13:24.760 --> 0:13:27.280
<v Speaker 1>think that they're all that dissimilar. If you think that

0:13:27.320 --> 0:13:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Austin Riley is the best and sure, and I think,

0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's obviously performed really well thus far. But

0:13:33.840 --> 0:13:35.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a lot of hype around all these guys,

0:13:35.559 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 1>Kess and Hira, Brendan Rodgers, so I think that they're

0:13:38.800 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 1>all close. I don't think that there's one prospect here

0:13:40.840 --> 0:13:43.320
<v Speaker 1>that's head and shoulders better than the rest. But if

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:45.640
<v Speaker 1>you were to say think that, then I understand why

0:13:45.640 --> 0:13:48.480
<v Speaker 1>you would be aggressive on that one player more than others.

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:50.160
<v Speaker 1>But I'm just saying, based on everything that I've read,

0:13:50.200 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 1>everything that I've seen, the way that I feel about

0:13:52.280 --> 0:13:56.080
<v Speaker 1>these prospects, I think that they're pretty close. And I'm

0:13:56.080 --> 0:13:59.160
<v Speaker 1>actually kind of surprised that you have Brendan Rodgers first here, Mike,

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:01.360
<v Speaker 1>because to me, I would have it, and I said

0:14:01.400 --> 0:14:03.240
<v Speaker 1>this all week, I would have a Kessing here first,

0:14:03.280 --> 0:14:05.640
<v Speaker 1>also Higley second, then maybe a little bit of a gap,

0:14:05.640 --> 0:14:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I would have Brendan Rodgers and then maybe a little

0:14:07.679 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 1>bit more of a gap, and then Willie Calhoun. I

0:14:10.080 --> 0:14:12.199
<v Speaker 1>do think that all four of those guys are probably

0:14:12.520 --> 0:14:15.120
<v Speaker 1>in their own tier together, but I think that the

0:14:15.200 --> 0:14:18.959
<v Speaker 1>offensive upside, the output that Hera and Austin Riley can

0:14:19.000 --> 0:14:21.680
<v Speaker 1>give you outweighs what Brendan Rodgers can give you. So

0:14:21.680 --> 0:14:23.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm a little bit surprised you have them first on

0:14:23.120 --> 0:14:26.560
<v Speaker 1>that list. The reason being is because I am I

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:29.200
<v Speaker 1>think we do need to learn some lessons from past mistakes.

0:14:29.200 --> 0:14:32.760
<v Speaker 1>And Carter keybu the big mistake was, Yeah, he sucked,

0:14:32.920 --> 0:14:35.720
<v Speaker 1>But this team was competing, and they have other players

0:14:35.720 --> 0:14:38.120
<v Speaker 1>who could play those positions when they're at least healthy.

0:14:38.480 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 1>And so do the Brewers and so do the Braves,

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 1>And those are two teams that are very much so

0:14:43.200 --> 0:14:45.400
<v Speaker 1>competing hoping to win a division this year. They're in

0:14:45.440 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 1>a dog fight, each of them. So I don't necessarily

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:51.200
<v Speaker 1>think like if either one of those two guys were

0:14:51.240 --> 0:14:53.760
<v Speaker 1>to start to struggle, I wouldn't be surprised if we

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 1>see them either lose playing time to the veteran that

0:14:56.120 --> 0:14:58.680
<v Speaker 1>is going to return from injury, Whereas I don't think

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:00.760
<v Speaker 1>that is an issue. For Brandon Rodgers, that's the old

0:15:00.960 --> 0:15:04.320
<v Speaker 1>To me, it's like the the upside and the safety combined.

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:06.320
<v Speaker 1>To me, it's just a little bit. It puts him

0:15:06.320 --> 0:15:07.880
<v Speaker 1>a little bit higher than the other guys. For me,

0:15:08.600 --> 0:15:10.440
<v Speaker 1>I just have some concerns when it comes to the

0:15:10.520 --> 0:15:13.120
<v Speaker 1>Rockies because it feels like when whenever they've had prospects

0:15:13.160 --> 0:15:15.120
<v Speaker 1>or young players, and I realized that Brendan Rodgers is

0:15:15.440 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 1>their top prospect, Like he is a higher ranked prospect

0:15:18.080 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 1>than guys like Garrett Hampson and Ryan McMahon the past,

0:15:20.600 --> 0:15:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and even even Ryan mel Tappy. But it seems like

0:15:22.680 --> 0:15:25.640
<v Speaker 1>they've had prospects forever and they've been so hesitant to

0:15:25.680 --> 0:15:27.920
<v Speaker 1>give these guys an opportunity. Now Brendan Rodgers is going

0:15:27.960 --> 0:15:29.680
<v Speaker 1>to be up today, should be in the line up.

0:15:29.680 --> 0:15:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully that's what we're expecting. But it just seems like

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:34.720
<v Speaker 1>they are a team more so than even other teams.

0:15:34.720 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Greg were like, if a prospect is struggling, that they're

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 1>gonna find a way to like get a veteran in there,

0:15:39.960 --> 0:15:41.760
<v Speaker 1>or find a way to mess this stuff like Pat

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:47.280
<v Speaker 1>Vlaika or like Mark Rennolds. We wanted Ryan McMahon or

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Garrett have should be a thing, and they gave these

0:15:49.240 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 1>guys opportunities this year and they haven't capitalized. So I

0:15:51.880 --> 0:15:53.760
<v Speaker 1>understand that. And I like brend Rodgers. I don't want

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:55.720
<v Speaker 1>to sound like I'm poop pooing him. I like him

0:15:55.760 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 1>as well, and having exposure to coors Field is a

0:15:58.760 --> 0:16:01.480
<v Speaker 1>is a very big factor for fantasy baseball, But it

0:16:01.560 --> 0:16:05.800
<v Speaker 1>just seems like organizationally, Greg their philosophy has been that

0:16:06.800 --> 0:16:09.800
<v Speaker 1>they just don't trust the players all that much totally,

0:16:09.920 --> 0:16:13.560
<v Speaker 1>and and Atlanta are going just going back. Atlanta has

0:16:13.560 --> 0:16:15.720
<v Speaker 1>been the opposite, right, like they've kind of let their

0:16:15.760 --> 0:16:18.400
<v Speaker 1>young players run with it in a way. With Albie's

0:16:18.480 --> 0:16:22.640
<v Speaker 1>and Swanson and Alcuna, of course, I think those guys

0:16:22.680 --> 0:16:25.520
<v Speaker 1>though they came up at a different time. They came

0:16:25.640 --> 0:16:27.960
<v Speaker 1>up when the break like last year. I know the

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Baper is one the division. They did not have expectations

0:16:30.520 --> 0:16:32.400
<v Speaker 1>of that. Their their plan was to let the young

0:16:32.480 --> 0:16:35.640
<v Speaker 1>kids play and they ended up completely outperforming what everyone

0:16:35.680 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 1>thought and running away with it, which is awesome to see.

0:16:38.400 --> 0:16:41.560
<v Speaker 1>But they they're competing now and there they need to win.

0:16:41.600 --> 0:16:43.520
<v Speaker 1>And the Brewers, we know they like to mix and match.

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Was it a break? When we come back. I want

0:16:46.120 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 1>to get into Willie Calhoun for a moment because I

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:49.680
<v Speaker 1>joked about it with you, Frank yesterday, and I want

0:16:49.680 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 1>to ask you about it today. Florio Daily Rhodo dot

0:16:54.640 --> 0:16:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Com learned from the game's best DFS players. We don't

0:16:58.680 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 1>just give you advice. We play every day, all major sports,

0:17:04.000 --> 0:17:08.280
<v Speaker 1>all year round. We never stopped industry leading DBS tools

0:17:08.280 --> 0:17:12.760
<v Speaker 1>and custom projections, and now the Daily Roado dot Com Optimizer.

0:17:13.080 --> 0:17:15.919
<v Speaker 1>In minutes, build an optimized line up for cash games

0:17:15.960 --> 0:17:20.200
<v Speaker 1>and tourneys. Learn from the game's best DBS players joined

0:17:20.280 --> 0:17:25.200
<v Speaker 1>Daily Roado dot Com. The following ad contains shocking material.

0:17:25.440 --> 0:17:29.760
<v Speaker 1>Listener discretion is advised. Is someone in your family playing

0:17:29.760 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 1>a dangerous game of Russian Roulette? Over forty three thousand

0:17:33.600 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 1>people die a year from drug overdose. A hundred and

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:40.679
<v Speaker 1>twenty people a day, five people every hour, one person

0:17:40.920 --> 0:17:45.880
<v Speaker 1>every twelve minutes. Eight thousand people die every year from

0:17:45.920 --> 0:17:49.640
<v Speaker 1>alcohol abuse. Over two hundred and forty people a day,

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:54.159
<v Speaker 1>ten an hour, one person every six minutes. Somebody you know.

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:57.760
<v Speaker 1>Maybe next learn how to help someone you love get

0:17:57.760 --> 0:18:01.760
<v Speaker 1>away from the drugs, alcohol and bad influences. With the

0:18:01.920 --> 0:18:04.000
<v Speaker 1>f m l A, people can take a leave of

0:18:04.040 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 1>absence from their job and still keep it. Call now

0:18:07.240 --> 0:18:10.679
<v Speaker 1>and learn how we can help you. Eight six six

0:18:11.040 --> 0:18:15.240
<v Speaker 1>four eight four nine six two one eight six six

0:18:15.520 --> 0:18:19.160
<v Speaker 1>four eight four nine six two one. That's age six

0:18:19.200 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 1>six four eight four ninety six full fantasy that was

0:18:25.800 --> 0:18:28.320
<v Speaker 1>similar you guys playing first come first Earth league, so

0:18:28.359 --> 0:18:31.320
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these guys are probably gone at this point.

0:18:31.480 --> 0:18:33.119
<v Speaker 1>You know, you really have to stay on top of

0:18:33.119 --> 0:18:35.800
<v Speaker 1>the news and you gotta be quick to the trigger man.

0:18:35.840 --> 0:18:38.080
<v Speaker 1>You can't even really sleep in those leagues. And I

0:18:38.119 --> 0:18:40.840
<v Speaker 1>don't play in any league that at first come, first served,

0:18:40.840 --> 0:18:43.600
<v Speaker 1>because it's not right. And this is again from the

0:18:43.640 --> 0:18:46.240
<v Speaker 1>perspective of someone who could take advantage of it, and

0:18:46.240 --> 0:18:48.399
<v Speaker 1>I just don't think it's right. Week days to the

0:18:48.440 --> 0:18:50.720
<v Speaker 1>four pm Eastern on the Fantasy Sports Network and on

0:18:50.720 --> 0:19:02.600
<v Speaker 1>your popular podcast providers. So back with you here on

0:19:02.640 --> 0:19:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the Fantasy PFS. We're gonna give you out the prices

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:06.600
<v Speaker 1>that we think you should spend on these guys. I

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:08.760
<v Speaker 1>promise you will go in nice in order and make

0:19:08.760 --> 0:19:10.760
<v Speaker 1>it easy for you. But before we do, I wanted

0:19:10.800 --> 0:19:12.679
<v Speaker 1>to speak about Willie Calhoun a little bit more in

0:19:12.720 --> 0:19:15.520
<v Speaker 1>depth for a moment. Now. Last year, all three of

0:19:15.600 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>us were all in a Willie Calhoun floria, probably third

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:19.960
<v Speaker 1>out of the three of us, obviously the most frank.

0:19:20.320 --> 0:19:22.520
<v Speaker 1>It didn't work out. He finally got called up, he

0:19:22.520 --> 0:19:24.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't hit, he got sent back down, finally came back

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:27.000
<v Speaker 1>like literally the last two weeks of September, was never

0:19:27.040 --> 0:19:29.480
<v Speaker 1>given consistent playing time. He's been up for two days

0:19:29.480 --> 0:19:31.880
<v Speaker 1>to home runs for Texas, batty out of the two hole,

0:19:31.960 --> 0:19:34.320
<v Speaker 1>one day at d H, one day in left field.

0:19:34.520 --> 0:19:38.359
<v Speaker 1>New managers Chris Woodward in Texas, so holy new regime,

0:19:38.520 --> 0:19:44.119
<v Speaker 1>totally new opportunity for Calhoun. And I think some of

0:19:44.200 --> 0:19:48.000
<v Speaker 1>the prospect luster Mike. He's gone from Willie Calhoun because

0:19:48.040 --> 0:19:50.720
<v Speaker 1>of what happened last year. We haven't seen Austin Riley yet.

0:19:50.720 --> 0:19:54.280
<v Speaker 1>We haven't seen um here A yet. We haven't seen

0:19:54.320 --> 0:19:56.800
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Rogers yet. We haven't seen Nicki Lopez yet. We

0:19:56.800 --> 0:20:00.879
<v Speaker 1>haven't seen Oscar Mercado yet. We have seen Calhoun. And

0:20:00.960 --> 0:20:04.680
<v Speaker 1>because of that, I think in forget the expert league,

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:06.680
<v Speaker 1>but I think people's home leagues, they're gonna se Willie Calhoun.

0:20:06.680 --> 0:20:08.800
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna be like, all right, been there, done that,

0:20:08.840 --> 0:20:10.919
<v Speaker 1>it didn't work. So I think he could actually get

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 1>him a little cheaper. Why is he in your top

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:18.920
<v Speaker 1>four with Riley, Hera and Rogers. So I thought the

0:20:18.960 --> 0:20:21.479
<v Speaker 1>same thing Greggy, And when he first got the call up,

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:23.920
<v Speaker 1>I wrote on Patreon, I would spend five to ten

0:20:23.920 --> 0:20:27.040
<v Speaker 1>percent in my fab because my thinking was everyone else

0:20:27.119 --> 0:20:30.679
<v Speaker 1>is going to want these other prospects. Willie Calhoun, like

0:20:30.720 --> 0:20:33.600
<v Speaker 1>you said, has lost that luster. We've seen him fail before.

0:20:34.040 --> 0:20:36.120
<v Speaker 1>I thought people were gonna kind of be like, all right,

0:20:36.160 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I'll get Willie Calhoun has a backup bid, and I

0:20:38.400 --> 0:20:41.240
<v Speaker 1>was dead wrong. Like Franken attested this, he went for

0:20:41.320 --> 0:20:44.320
<v Speaker 1>over twenty dollars in both of our home leagues, and

0:20:44.359 --> 0:20:46.280
<v Speaker 1>that's a league where I thought people were gonna think

0:20:46.280 --> 0:20:48.680
<v Speaker 1>the same way. He went for more than Nicky Lopez,

0:20:48.720 --> 0:20:51.760
<v Speaker 1>he went for more than Mercado. So I don't think

0:20:51.800 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 1>people are are reacting the way we thought. Greggy and

0:20:54.800 --> 0:20:57.280
<v Speaker 1>I fully admitted on my podcast yesterday, like I read

0:20:57.280 --> 0:20:59.760
<v Speaker 1>this situation wrong with Willie Calhoun. I hope you didn't

0:20:59.840 --> 0:21:02.720
<v Speaker 1>live into the five or your fab didn't run yet,

0:21:02.720 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 1>because I think he is going to be in a

0:21:04.400 --> 0:21:07.359
<v Speaker 1>similar range as those other guys. To me, he's fourth,

0:21:07.600 --> 0:21:11.199
<v Speaker 1>just because I do think that that luster is a

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:13.080
<v Speaker 1>little bit worn off with him, where the other guys

0:21:13.119 --> 0:21:17.200
<v Speaker 1>everyone is really excited, but still Willie Calhoun was mashing

0:21:17.480 --> 0:21:19.440
<v Speaker 1>at the Triple A level this year, hitting three or

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:22.199
<v Speaker 1>four eight home runs UH twenty two r b I

0:21:22.359 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 1>and then he had over four ov p and then

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:27.280
<v Speaker 1>the fact that he's come up and played this well.

0:21:27.480 --> 0:21:30.359
<v Speaker 1>I think everyone is excited and I don't see reason

0:21:30.359 --> 0:21:33.240
<v Speaker 1>why they shouldn't be. The Texas Rangers are not competing

0:21:33.240 --> 0:21:35.720
<v Speaker 1>this year. We know that. I don't think Hunter Pence

0:21:36.040 --> 0:21:39.600
<v Speaker 1>or since You Chew are really gonna stand in his way. Unfortunately.

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:41.960
<v Speaker 1>I think both of those guys, Pence being the big loser,

0:21:42.000 --> 0:21:44.520
<v Speaker 1>but I think both loses sometimes. Woodward does not seem

0:21:44.560 --> 0:21:48.040
<v Speaker 1>to trust Choo against lefties for some reason, so so

0:21:48.119 --> 0:21:49.879
<v Speaker 1>I think both of those guys kind of step aside.

0:21:49.880 --> 0:21:52.280
<v Speaker 1>I think they're going to let Willie Calhoun continue to play.

0:21:52.440 --> 0:21:54.720
<v Speaker 1>He's gonna bat in the two hole, and yesterday it

0:21:54.760 --> 0:21:56.680
<v Speaker 1>was great to see the only player in that game,

0:21:56.920 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 1>and the Texas Rangers put up a lot of runs.

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:01.280
<v Speaker 1>At least when I looked, the only player who who

0:22:01.320 --> 0:22:04.120
<v Speaker 1>had a higher a ball harder hit than Willy Calhoun's

0:22:04.160 --> 0:22:07.320
<v Speaker 1>multiple hits yesterday was Joey Gallows. So that's really good

0:22:07.600 --> 0:22:09.800
<v Speaker 1>company to be in. He's hitting the ball hard, he's

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:11.800
<v Speaker 1>doing everything you wanted to see so far. He's red

0:22:11.800 --> 0:22:13.960
<v Speaker 1>hot right now. I think because of that hot start

0:22:14.000 --> 0:22:15.560
<v Speaker 1>and because of what he's been doing in Triple A.

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:17.680
<v Speaker 1>He is going to be right up there with those

0:22:17.680 --> 0:22:20.320
<v Speaker 1>other guys. Yeah, and I've read the situation wrong as well, Mike.

0:22:20.359 --> 0:22:22.320
<v Speaker 1>I had I think a six or seven dollar bid

0:22:22.320 --> 0:22:24.160
<v Speaker 1>in our home league, and he goes for twenty two

0:22:24.160 --> 0:22:26.880
<v Speaker 1>and twenty one dollars respectively in our two home leagues,

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:29.600
<v Speaker 1>both twelve team head to head points keeper leagues. So

0:22:29.960 --> 0:22:31.399
<v Speaker 1>I understand why he would go for a little bit more,

0:22:31.440 --> 0:22:32.919
<v Speaker 1>especially in the keeper league, if you think that he

0:22:32.920 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 1>has some staying power and obviously for years to come

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:37.879
<v Speaker 1>the upside that he has. But professional hitter man, this

0:22:37.920 --> 0:22:40.199
<v Speaker 1>is what I really like about Willie Calhoun. Say what

0:22:40.240 --> 0:22:42.240
<v Speaker 1>you will about his defense, He's a horrible defender. He

0:22:42.359 --> 0:22:45.480
<v Speaker 1>might honestly work out as a as a full time

0:22:45.520 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>d H. It's crazy to say as young as he is,

0:22:47.640 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 1>he's still only twenty four years old, but he is

0:22:50.359 --> 0:22:52.160
<v Speaker 1>that bad of a fielder. But if you look at

0:22:52.200 --> 0:22:54.399
<v Speaker 1>his minor league numbers, there's a guy who's never struck

0:22:54.400 --> 0:22:57.399
<v Speaker 1>out more than fifteen point nine percent at any level

0:22:57.440 --> 0:23:00.240
<v Speaker 1>of the miners. This season, Mike spoke about his EP

0:23:00.280 --> 0:23:04.119
<v Speaker 1>had four sixteen fifteen point nine percent walk great for

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Willie Calhoun, A thirteen point eight percent strike already. This

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:10.399
<v Speaker 1>guy is a professional hitter. He hits line drives um.

0:23:10.520 --> 0:23:12.800
<v Speaker 1>He's hitting for power already at the major league level.

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:15.639
<v Speaker 1>He has a thirty one homer season under his belt

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:17.640
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years ago when he came over from

0:23:17.680 --> 0:23:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the Los Angeles Dodgers, and between the Dodgers and Rangers

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:23.120
<v Speaker 1>farm sist from that year, he had thirty one home

0:23:23.240 --> 0:23:25.680
<v Speaker 1>runs in the minors. He was performing well this year.

0:23:26.080 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 1>I think he's gonna be in the lineup. I don't

0:23:27.520 --> 0:23:29.680
<v Speaker 1>really worry about splits with him either, unless that's something

0:23:29.720 --> 0:23:32.080
<v Speaker 1>that Chris Woodward worries about, because when I looked into

0:23:32.160 --> 0:23:34.919
<v Speaker 1>his minor league numbers, he didn't struggle against lefties at

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 1>any level. So again, professional hitter and a guy that

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 1>can hit for power in a really good spot in

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:43.879
<v Speaker 1>a really good lineup like we gotta. I think we

0:23:43.960 --> 0:23:46.080
<v Speaker 1>underestimated the Rangers line up coming into this year. It's

0:23:46.119 --> 0:23:48.080
<v Speaker 1>still a really, really good ballpark to hit in and

0:23:48.119 --> 0:23:50.640
<v Speaker 1>for him to hit second in that lineup, behind Shinsu

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Chu and ahead of guys like Elvis Andrews when he's healthy,

0:23:53.960 --> 0:23:56.560
<v Speaker 1>and Joey Gallo and all these other matters behind him

0:23:56.720 --> 0:23:59.320
<v Speaker 1>He's in a really, really good spot. So I do

0:23:59.359 --> 0:24:01.879
<v Speaker 1>agree that if you if you need power and you

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:06.600
<v Speaker 1>need batting average, specifically those two categories, and you're playing

0:24:06.600 --> 0:24:08.880
<v Speaker 1>a five outfielder league, you're gonna have to be really aggressive.

0:24:08.920 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 1>You're looking at now. One of the I really like

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:15.240
<v Speaker 1>about Calhoun, outside of the statistics that you guys both gave,

0:24:15.880 --> 0:24:19.560
<v Speaker 1>is what I also liked about Heilopez. He wasn't called Like, yes,

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:22.639
<v Speaker 1>Elvis Andrews got hurt, but I don't know that that

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:24.960
<v Speaker 1>had anything to do with whom being called up, you

0:24:25.000 --> 0:24:28.320
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean. Like, it's not like Willie Calhoun's

0:24:28.359 --> 0:24:30.720
<v Speaker 1>playing the infields all any of their outfielders are coming inside.

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:32.199
<v Speaker 1>They just called him up because he's ready. They called

0:24:32.240 --> 0:24:34.199
<v Speaker 1>him up because he's ready, and they batted him right

0:24:34.240 --> 0:24:36.439
<v Speaker 1>there in the top of the order, and he's obviously

0:24:36.480 --> 0:24:39.920
<v Speaker 1>produced for the first two games. Much like Lopez this year,

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:44.960
<v Speaker 1>unlike last year, Calhoun seems safe and if you're looking

0:24:45.080 --> 0:24:48.560
<v Speaker 1>for a little bit of safety, Calhoun's your guy. When

0:24:48.600 --> 0:24:50.840
<v Speaker 1>they changed the ball in the minor leagues, he went

0:24:50.880 --> 0:24:52.640
<v Speaker 1>from not having any power last year, if you remember

0:24:52.680 --> 0:24:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Frank that was a huge issue. He had eight home

0:24:54.920 --> 0:24:57.040
<v Speaker 1>runs thus far this year he had eight home runs

0:24:57.040 --> 0:24:58.600
<v Speaker 1>in like thirty games. He had nine and over a

0:24:58.640 --> 0:25:01.359
<v Speaker 1>hundred last year. Is I don't know how many times

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:04.080
<v Speaker 1>this week for these prospects, I've had to write career

0:25:04.119 --> 0:25:06.120
<v Speaker 1>high eyes. So this year the juice ball is real,

0:25:06.359 --> 0:25:08.560
<v Speaker 1>like and the power that you're seeing in Triple A

0:25:08.600 --> 0:25:13.120
<v Speaker 1>from these guys is going to translate over my opinion, Yeah,

0:25:13.480 --> 0:25:17.080
<v Speaker 1>I totally totally agree with that. Um So that's why

0:25:17.200 --> 0:25:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Calhoun gets in Florio's top four and gets people like

0:25:21.040 --> 0:25:24.280
<v Speaker 1>Frank really excited. Uh And that makes sense to me. Okay,

0:25:25.840 --> 0:25:28.239
<v Speaker 1>before we give the prices, I just want to hit

0:25:29.080 --> 0:25:32.359
<v Speaker 1>one more thing. You just retweeted Aaron Glenman Florio and

0:25:32.400 --> 0:25:35.960
<v Speaker 1>you talked about Luis Ariah is getting called up for Minnesota.

0:25:36.440 --> 0:25:38.800
<v Speaker 1>What can you tell us about him and where does

0:25:38.840 --> 0:25:41.879
<v Speaker 1>he belong in all of us? Yeah, he's an afterthought,

0:25:42.000 --> 0:25:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I think. Uh. I don't even know if he's going

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:46.160
<v Speaker 1>to play every day for the Twins. I don't know

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 1>too much about his like prospect pedigree, but what I

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:52.080
<v Speaker 1>read during the break was no power, a little bit

0:25:52.080 --> 0:25:55.480
<v Speaker 1>of speed, really good bad on ball. Uh So to me,

0:25:55.720 --> 0:25:58.879
<v Speaker 1>and what even like the beat writers are are speculating

0:25:58.960 --> 0:26:00.640
<v Speaker 1>right now, is like he is a f piece. He's

0:26:00.680 --> 0:26:03.720
<v Speaker 1>going to play some games here and there, But for fantasy,

0:26:03.840 --> 0:26:08.919
<v Speaker 1>I think he's more of just an afterthought. Florio, I know,

0:26:09.040 --> 0:26:11.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, Frankie. I know you don't have much on Aria.

0:26:11.600 --> 0:26:14.200
<v Speaker 1>So I want to go to you about another prospect

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:15.960
<v Speaker 1>that was called up kind of under the radar. You

0:26:16.040 --> 0:26:18.360
<v Speaker 1>pointed that out to me. It was Sean Anderson for

0:26:18.480 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 1>the San Francisco Giants. What should we know about him

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and should we should we invest here or is it

0:26:24.520 --> 0:26:26.800
<v Speaker 1>not worth of this point? Wait and see? I think

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 1>in twelve team leagues or shallower than that, it's it's

0:26:29.080 --> 0:26:30.720
<v Speaker 1>a wait and see. You put him on your scout team.

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:32.920
<v Speaker 1>He is the top picteing prospect for the Giants. Doesn't

0:26:32.920 --> 0:26:34.880
<v Speaker 1>really say much, I don't have a great farm system.

0:26:35.080 --> 0:26:37.560
<v Speaker 1>Probably projects out more of like a mid to late

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:40.400
<v Speaker 1>rotation piece at the major league level, like SP three

0:26:40.480 --> 0:26:43.199
<v Speaker 1>or SP four. But I think it's worth noting just

0:26:43.200 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 1>because he's gonna play half of his home games, half

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:48.920
<v Speaker 1>of his games in Oracle Park, obviously in that big ballpark,

0:26:49.359 --> 0:26:52.119
<v Speaker 1>doesn't really have doesn't really flash anywhere, like, doesn't have

0:26:52.160 --> 0:26:56.000
<v Speaker 1>like a plus fastball, but he's solid across the board. Um,

0:26:56.240 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 1>more of like a fifteen teamer maybe obviously and now

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:02.719
<v Speaker 1>only Uh, the Giants don't have you know, great pitching

0:27:02.720 --> 0:27:05.959
<v Speaker 1>outside of like Madison Bumgardner, who's performed, you know, all

0:27:06.040 --> 0:27:08.080
<v Speaker 1>right this year. But I think that they're going to

0:27:08.160 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 1>leave this guy in the rotation. They want to see

0:27:09.760 --> 0:27:11.440
<v Speaker 1>what they have in him. Uh, and the fact that

0:27:11.480 --> 0:27:13.560
<v Speaker 1>he pitches his home games in Oracle Park. I think

0:27:13.560 --> 0:27:15.680
<v Speaker 1>he's worth a look in deeper leagues like fifteen team

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:17.800
<v Speaker 1>makes if you're really desperate for pitching. And obviously and

0:27:18.000 --> 0:27:19.639
<v Speaker 1>only just because he has a spot in the rotation

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:21.760
<v Speaker 1>right now, all right, So let's give out then what

0:27:21.840 --> 0:27:25.280
<v Speaker 1>you are spending. So I was gonna just real quick

0:27:25.320 --> 0:27:28.280
<v Speaker 1>before we go over these guys, because these are the

0:27:28.320 --> 0:27:30.520
<v Speaker 1>six that everyone like cares about and we know that

0:27:31.080 --> 0:27:33.239
<v Speaker 1>like someone in Frank's position this week, do you think

0:27:33.240 --> 0:27:35.000
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna be able to sneak one by the goal

0:27:35.040 --> 0:27:36.880
<v Speaker 1>and get these guys for cheaper than they are, Because

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:38.600
<v Speaker 1>I do think that's gonna happen this week. I think

0:27:38.640 --> 0:27:41.120
<v Speaker 1>everyone is bracing to spend big fab on these six

0:27:41.160 --> 0:27:43.879
<v Speaker 1>guys that the other guys are gonna be even cheaper

0:27:45.080 --> 0:27:48.399
<v Speaker 1>like non prospects. I agree, Yeah, like any of these,

0:27:48.520 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 1>even like Corbyn Martin, I think is getting overlooked right now,

0:27:51.240 --> 0:27:53.600
<v Speaker 1>So I'd be loved. I'd be happy to get him.

0:27:53.720 --> 0:27:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I very much agree with you Florida that the guys

0:27:56.920 --> 0:27:59.200
<v Speaker 1>were gonna talk about in a moment, the veterans that

0:27:59.240 --> 0:28:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Tommy Lostella. I picked up Macgilson and her homely for

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:04.040
<v Speaker 1>four bucks. Yeah, that's like one of those where like

0:28:04.080 --> 0:28:09.240
<v Speaker 1>he gets overlooked top prospect because everybody's putting the people down.

0:28:09.400 --> 0:28:12.119
<v Speaker 1>Everyone's just so focused on the young guys. These veterans

0:28:12.160 --> 0:28:13.639
<v Speaker 1>are gonna go for a lot less. And I know

0:28:13.760 --> 0:28:15.960
<v Speaker 1>Frankie were working this morning on guys are out there

0:28:16.000 --> 0:28:18.680
<v Speaker 1>in GST outside of the young players. Guys are out

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:21.000
<v Speaker 1>there in g d D for us that are not

0:28:21.119 --> 0:28:22.920
<v Speaker 1>these young players, guys that people whore go going to

0:28:23.000 --> 0:28:25.359
<v Speaker 1>forget about because so much money is going to be

0:28:25.440 --> 0:28:28.280
<v Speaker 1>spent on these young players. But that's what you care about.

0:28:28.280 --> 0:28:30.359
<v Speaker 1>And we understand that. We get it's fabulous of Friday.

0:28:30.600 --> 0:28:35.879
<v Speaker 1>So how much this weekend of their budget should players

0:28:35.920 --> 0:28:40.440
<v Speaker 1>spend on Austin Riley. Let's start there, um, all right?

0:28:40.480 --> 0:28:43.480
<v Speaker 1>So if I was just saying twenty on Willie Calhoun.

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:45.479
<v Speaker 1>I think Austin Riley is in that range. I can

0:28:45.480 --> 0:28:47.640
<v Speaker 1>see him getting a little bit more hype. Look, I

0:28:47.720 --> 0:28:51.720
<v Speaker 1>spent over thirty pcent of my fab on Carter Key Boom,

0:28:51.800 --> 0:28:53.640
<v Speaker 1>So if this is your guy, you need to find

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:55.800
<v Speaker 1>the one that's your guy. You need to find your guy.

0:28:55.840 --> 0:28:57.840
<v Speaker 1>You need a third baseman, you need a quarter infielder

0:28:57.920 --> 0:29:00.480
<v Speaker 1>or alfielder. Goes back to what we were saying earlier,

0:29:00.560 --> 0:29:02.840
<v Speaker 1>positional needs, statistical needs. You have to figure out about

0:29:02.840 --> 0:29:05.360
<v Speaker 1>what you really need for your for your team, and

0:29:05.400 --> 0:29:07.440
<v Speaker 1>you're going to be really aggressive for that player. And

0:29:07.440 --> 0:29:09.720
<v Speaker 1>it's not to say like you're obviously gonna set backup

0:29:09.720 --> 0:29:11.680
<v Speaker 1>bids for the other prospects as well, but you have

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:14.920
<v Speaker 1>to decipher which one is the one for you. So

0:29:15.520 --> 0:29:17.400
<v Speaker 1>if it's if it turned out to be Willie Calhoun,

0:29:17.440 --> 0:29:19.840
<v Speaker 1>then I could see approaching thirty percent. You gotta get

0:29:19.880 --> 0:29:22.120
<v Speaker 1>that guy on your team. I understand that. Again, I

0:29:22.120 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 1>spent over thirty percent on Carter Key Boom, and I'm

0:29:24.560 --> 0:29:26.960
<v Speaker 1>hating myself right now for it, but it's in the past.

0:29:27.240 --> 0:29:29.440
<v Speaker 1>If you need Austin Riley, you need some pop, you

0:29:29.480 --> 0:29:32.960
<v Speaker 1>need some power. Uh, you need batting average. Everything that

0:29:33.000 --> 0:29:35.240
<v Speaker 1>he's done thus far, everything he's done in the minors,

0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:37.760
<v Speaker 1>fifteen home runs in the minors his first two games.

0:29:37.840 --> 0:29:39.800
<v Speaker 1>He looks the part. All the quotes that I've seen

0:29:39.800 --> 0:29:42.800
<v Speaker 1>about him. I retweeted something from Bryan Snedeker last night

0:29:42.800 --> 0:29:46.400
<v Speaker 1>as well, Brian McMahon talking about how legit this kid is. Um,

0:29:46.440 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 1>it's gonna takecent and if you really need that power,

0:29:49.600 --> 0:29:51.800
<v Speaker 1>you really need that batting average. I could see going

0:29:51.840 --> 0:29:57.400
<v Speaker 1>over thirty percent from Greg the Oh no, I was

0:29:57.400 --> 0:30:00.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna say, I agree on that. I've been saying a

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:03.040
<v Speaker 1>week twenty and in fifteen team leagues leads with an

0:30:03.040 --> 0:30:07.800
<v Speaker 1>overall anything like that with go even willing to go

0:30:07.840 --> 0:30:09.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit higher if you really want him. I

0:30:10.040 --> 0:30:11.960
<v Speaker 1>will say, though, I've been telling people, if you play

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:14.120
<v Speaker 1>in a you know, a twelve team home league, I

0:30:14.160 --> 0:30:15.920
<v Speaker 1>think you devalue it a little bit. You can make

0:30:15.920 --> 0:30:18.720
<v Speaker 1>it twenty percent there just because I don't. I feel

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:21.280
<v Speaker 1>like players are less aggressive in those leagues. And that

0:30:21.320 --> 0:30:23.960
<v Speaker 1>makes sense. I've seen even in like twelve team NFBC

0:30:24.480 --> 0:30:28.960
<v Speaker 1>leagues when people are talking about fab traditionally the players

0:30:28.960 --> 0:30:31.280
<v Speaker 1>go for much more in fifteen teams just because you

0:30:31.320 --> 0:30:34.520
<v Speaker 1>don't get this level of talent all coming up at once, um,

0:30:34.640 --> 0:30:37.240
<v Speaker 1>and it's just it's obviously harder to find players that

0:30:37.280 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 1>can contribute in fifteen team leagues is compared to twelve teamers.

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:42.040
<v Speaker 1>So I agree we see a week in a week

0:30:42.040 --> 0:30:45.040
<v Speaker 1>out that in fifteen teamers in those deeper leagues. Uh,

0:30:45.080 --> 0:30:47.880
<v Speaker 1>these prospects and just players overall go for more money

0:30:47.880 --> 0:30:50.000
<v Speaker 1>than than in the twelve teams. Prospects in general are

0:30:50.000 --> 0:30:52.160
<v Speaker 1>always to go for more money, whether it's expert lease

0:30:52.240 --> 0:30:55.520
<v Speaker 1>or twelve team least or in one league. Alston Riley

0:30:55.560 --> 0:30:58.680
<v Speaker 1>went for twenty dollars in our twelve. Yeah, I had

0:30:58.680 --> 0:31:01.440
<v Speaker 1>a fourteen dollar bit on him. But you weren't surprised

0:31:01.440 --> 0:31:03.520
<v Speaker 1>by this, so I wasn't. I wasn't surprised. Okay, so

0:31:04.080 --> 0:31:07.320
<v Speaker 1>you said cal who you have said now Austin Riley

0:31:07.320 --> 0:31:10.719
<v Speaker 1>as well, Flora, let me start with you with Hira

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:15.640
<v Speaker 1>here or whatever. To me, they're all these big guys,

0:31:15.680 --> 0:31:18.040
<v Speaker 1>these big four, and it's gonna sound kind of boring.

0:31:18.080 --> 0:31:20.680
<v Speaker 1>I've got like to me, I agree with Frank said,

0:31:20.680 --> 0:31:22.240
<v Speaker 1>you find the one that you really want and you'd

0:31:22.240 --> 0:31:24.720
<v Speaker 1>be most aggressive on him. But for if you know

0:31:24.760 --> 0:31:27.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling people, what's the bid. I'm telling on this too,

0:31:27.920 --> 0:31:30.040
<v Speaker 1>unless you're in like a shallower league, which then I've

0:31:30.080 --> 0:31:33.120
<v Speaker 1>been saying twenty to because I think all of these

0:31:33.120 --> 0:31:35.600
<v Speaker 1>guys are going to go in a very very similar range.

0:31:35.680 --> 0:31:39.040
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna see a lot of two hundred dollar bids,

0:31:39.040 --> 0:31:40.760
<v Speaker 1>probably even a little bit more on some of them.

0:31:40.840 --> 0:31:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Socent is what I've been saying. But if this is

0:31:43.680 --> 0:31:45.880
<v Speaker 1>the guy that you want, I'm okay going up to

0:31:45.960 --> 0:31:49.440
<v Speaker 1>thirty on any of these guys. Yeah, and I agree

0:31:49.480 --> 0:31:51.120
<v Speaker 1>with that, and ah Along I had here as my

0:31:51.200 --> 0:31:53.760
<v Speaker 1>higher rank prospect, just in a vacuum, if you don't

0:31:53.800 --> 0:31:56.080
<v Speaker 1>have any positional need, if you just who's the best

0:31:56.080 --> 0:31:58.400
<v Speaker 1>prospect of the Barns. I think kess and Hira has

0:31:58.440 --> 0:32:01.680
<v Speaker 1>consistently been ranked as a higher rated prospect in Austin Riley.

0:32:01.760 --> 0:32:04.840
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't always work out that way, but three thirty

0:32:04.840 --> 0:32:06.880
<v Speaker 1>three in the minors this year, eleven home runs, it's

0:32:06.880 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of speed as well, just hitting in

0:32:08.920 --> 0:32:11.480
<v Speaker 1>a really good ballpark, obviously in Milwaukee, in a really

0:32:11.480 --> 0:32:13.840
<v Speaker 1>good lineup. It's just I think the ballpark and the

0:32:13.920 --> 0:32:16.200
<v Speaker 1>lineup give him a little bit more of an edge

0:32:16.240 --> 0:32:18.720
<v Speaker 1>over Austin Riley. And it's not like Atlanta is a

0:32:18.760 --> 0:32:21.240
<v Speaker 1>bad place to hit, but overall Miller Park is just

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:23.280
<v Speaker 1>better and and the Brewers lineup is better overall. So

0:32:23.280 --> 0:32:25.000
<v Speaker 1>that's why if you're just saying in a vacuum, I

0:32:25.000 --> 0:32:26.960
<v Speaker 1>would give a slight edge of questing here, Greg, And

0:32:27.000 --> 0:32:31.040
<v Speaker 1>that's what you said yesterday. I believe as well, good

0:32:31.040 --> 0:32:34.600
<v Speaker 1>whatever whatever was okay, that least just Brendan Rodgers. Right,

0:32:34.720 --> 0:32:38.240
<v Speaker 1>So Brenda Rogers and we grouping these four guys Floria.

0:32:38.240 --> 0:32:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I'll be with you again with Brenda Rodgers. Yeah, I'm

0:32:41.560 --> 0:32:45.840
<v Speaker 1>gonna say the same thing again. Go higher if this

0:32:45.880 --> 0:32:50.560
<v Speaker 1>is your guy home league. But another reason why I

0:32:50.640 --> 0:32:53.880
<v Speaker 1>love Rogers so much is I looked at yesterday the

0:32:53.880 --> 0:32:56.080
<v Speaker 1>production the Rockies have gotten out of the second base

0:32:56.120 --> 0:32:59.600
<v Speaker 1>position this year. You guys ready for this. It's absolutely disgusting.

0:32:59.680 --> 0:33:03.960
<v Speaker 1>A ninety nine average, which was uh the third lowest

0:33:04.000 --> 0:33:06.680
<v Speaker 1>amongst all teams from second base position this year. One

0:33:06.720 --> 0:33:08.720
<v Speaker 1>of which lower than them was the Gnats uh to

0:33:08.960 --> 0:33:12.240
<v Speaker 1>seventy o b P that was the lowest in the league,

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:15.120
<v Speaker 1>and a two nineties slugging, the second lowest in the league.

0:33:15.240 --> 0:33:17.640
<v Speaker 1>They play half their games in coors Field and they

0:33:17.640 --> 0:33:20.160
<v Speaker 1>can't even get a three hundred slugging percentage out of

0:33:20.200 --> 0:33:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the position. I think Brandon Rodgers has a long leash.

0:33:22.560 --> 0:33:24.640
<v Speaker 1>I think this is a team looking to make another

0:33:24.680 --> 0:33:26.800
<v Speaker 1>push like they did last year after a slow start,

0:33:26.920 --> 0:33:29.080
<v Speaker 1>and I think they realized, hey, we need to get

0:33:29.080 --> 0:33:31.440
<v Speaker 1>some production out of the second base position. So I

0:33:31.560 --> 0:33:34.640
<v Speaker 1>ultimately do believe his leash is like he's safe. I

0:33:34.640 --> 0:33:36.800
<v Speaker 1>think he as long as he doesn't, you know, completely

0:33:36.800 --> 0:33:38.800
<v Speaker 1>bottom out like hey boom, I think he will continue

0:33:38.800 --> 0:33:40.640
<v Speaker 1>to be up in the major League. So to me,

0:33:40.880 --> 0:33:42.840
<v Speaker 1>he that's the reason I feel a little bit safer

0:33:42.840 --> 0:33:44.800
<v Speaker 1>about him. That's why I keep saying I'm willing to

0:33:44.800 --> 0:33:47.160
<v Speaker 1>go over thirty percent for him. But again, these four

0:33:47.200 --> 0:33:51.840
<v Speaker 1>guys acent go upwards, go towards thirty five for whichever

0:33:51.880 --> 0:33:54.360
<v Speaker 1>one he feels strongest about. Yeah, Greg, We've got the

0:33:54.440 --> 0:33:57.840
<v Speaker 1>question a lot so far that well, is he just

0:33:57.880 --> 0:34:00.240
<v Speaker 1>filling in for Trevor stories Tevor stories heard or is

0:34:00.240 --> 0:34:02.920
<v Speaker 1>he here to play second base? I all along have

0:34:03.000 --> 0:34:05.120
<v Speaker 1>said I think it's the latter. I mean, Ryan mcmanhn

0:34:05.160 --> 0:34:07.120
<v Speaker 1>has been given an opportunity and he has not taken

0:34:07.120 --> 0:34:09.040
<v Speaker 1>advantage of it for most of the year he said

0:34:09.080 --> 0:34:11.640
<v Speaker 1>to thirty to forty. He has three home runs. Two

0:34:11.680 --> 0:34:14.800
<v Speaker 1>of those came in the same game, so he hasn't performed.

0:34:15.120 --> 0:34:17.239
<v Speaker 1>Garrett Hampson hasn't performed as well. Also. I do think

0:34:17.239 --> 0:34:19.799
<v Speaker 1>that Brendan Rodgers maybe if Trevor Story is still banged up,

0:34:19.800 --> 0:34:21.600
<v Speaker 1>he'll play shortstop a few games here, but I think

0:34:21.640 --> 0:34:23.960
<v Speaker 1>overall they want this kid up to play second base

0:34:24.000 --> 0:34:25.840
<v Speaker 1>full time for them. I don't have a problem with

0:34:25.840 --> 0:34:28.120
<v Speaker 1>that number. Me personally, I do rank him a little

0:34:28.160 --> 0:34:30.120
<v Speaker 1>bit lower than some of these other guys. I understand

0:34:30.120 --> 0:34:33.560
<v Speaker 1>it's coors Field. I just feel like Austin Riley and

0:34:33.680 --> 0:34:35.399
<v Speaker 1>Kesson here, and I might be wrong about this. I'm

0:34:35.440 --> 0:34:37.840
<v Speaker 1>not like a prospect guru by any means, but I

0:34:37.840 --> 0:34:40.400
<v Speaker 1>feel like those guys were more regarded as being better

0:34:40.480 --> 0:34:43.200
<v Speaker 1>offensive players and Brendan Rodgers. I feel like Rodgers is

0:34:43.239 --> 0:34:45.520
<v Speaker 1>better all around, like really good defender as well, and

0:34:45.640 --> 0:34:47.840
<v Speaker 1>that's why he gets hyped up in prospect circles or

0:34:47.880 --> 0:34:50.880
<v Speaker 1>from a fantasy perspective. I feel like Heira and Austin

0:34:50.960 --> 0:34:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Riley might have a little bit more upside, so that's

0:34:53.480 --> 0:34:55.080
<v Speaker 1>why I would rank those guys a little bit higher.

0:34:55.160 --> 0:34:57.200
<v Speaker 1>But if you want that exposure to course field, I can't.

0:34:57.239 --> 0:34:59.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't have a problem with going as high as

0:34:59.080 --> 0:35:02.600
<v Speaker 1>Florio saying does the defense factor into you guys at all?

0:35:02.640 --> 0:35:05.000
<v Speaker 1>That Austin Riley is playing an outfield position that he

0:35:05.160 --> 0:35:07.080
<v Speaker 1>just started to learn, and they have a guy a

0:35:07.120 --> 0:35:10.719
<v Speaker 1>gold Glover like Enteran Crt who they could ultimately fill

0:35:10.760 --> 0:35:13.480
<v Speaker 1>in his spot if he was to struggle or with

0:35:13.480 --> 0:35:15.840
<v Speaker 1>with Hiora. We hear all the time his defense is

0:35:15.920 --> 0:35:18.399
<v Speaker 1>far from what is why he is up here? Does

0:35:18.480 --> 0:35:21.080
<v Speaker 1>that question of factor into you at all? Because I

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:24.040
<v Speaker 1>know Carter Key Boom's defense struggled and that was part

0:35:24.040 --> 0:35:26.200
<v Speaker 1>of why he got sent back down. I think it's

0:35:26.200 --> 0:35:28.040
<v Speaker 1>a good question, and I think it's a fair point,

0:35:28.040 --> 0:35:29.640
<v Speaker 1>and I feel like we we address this a little

0:35:29.680 --> 0:35:31.600
<v Speaker 1>bit the other day Greg and we were talking about it.

0:35:31.640 --> 0:35:33.879
<v Speaker 1>But it always comes down to what they I think

0:35:33.880 --> 0:35:36.000
<v Speaker 1>it comes down to what they do offensively, what the

0:35:36.080 --> 0:35:41.040
<v Speaker 1>leash is for them defensively totally. So if Austin Riley hits,

0:35:41.080 --> 0:35:42.719
<v Speaker 1>I think that they're going to kind of suck it

0:35:42.800 --> 0:35:45.000
<v Speaker 1>up whatever he does in left field, like they'll pull

0:35:45.080 --> 0:35:46.680
<v Speaker 1>him late in games. We saw that the other day.

0:35:46.840 --> 0:35:51.279
<v Speaker 1>Charlie Colverson came in for him, and even once Enteran

0:35:51.320 --> 0:35:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Crt is back. This is just me speculating. I don't

0:35:53.680 --> 0:35:55.560
<v Speaker 1>think anyone knows right now. I saw, you know, a

0:35:55.560 --> 0:35:58.200
<v Speaker 1>few Atlanta Beat reporters have already been asked this question

0:35:58.200 --> 0:36:00.640
<v Speaker 1>and they're trying to answer to the us of their ability,

0:36:00.640 --> 0:36:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and they're saying like, I don't even think anyone really knows,

0:36:03.520 --> 0:36:05.719
<v Speaker 1>but my guests would be you know, they'll give mar

0:36:05.800 --> 0:36:07.680
<v Speaker 1>Cacis a day off here and there, They'll get Entering

0:36:07.760 --> 0:36:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Crt in the lineup. They'll give Josh Donaldson a day

0:36:10.120 --> 0:36:11.799
<v Speaker 1>off here and there because he's a little bit older,

0:36:11.840 --> 0:36:14.759
<v Speaker 1>and they'll play Austin Riley at third base for those games.

0:36:14.760 --> 0:36:17.160
<v Speaker 1>And I think he'll play most of the time as

0:36:17.200 --> 0:36:18.879
<v Speaker 1>long as he performs. And when it comes to Kess

0:36:18.880 --> 0:36:21.520
<v Speaker 1>and Hira, look, Mike, I don't know how good he

0:36:21.560 --> 0:36:23.920
<v Speaker 1>is defensively or how bad he is, but he's got

0:36:23.920 --> 0:36:27.200
<v Speaker 1>to be better than Mike lu Stock second base. So

0:36:27.680 --> 0:36:29.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that obviously helps his cause as well. So

0:36:29.960 --> 0:36:32.440
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like hera safer potentially than Auston Riley and

0:36:32.440 --> 0:36:35.640
<v Speaker 1>Brandon Rodgers, just given the Colorado Rockies theories and not

0:36:35.640 --> 0:36:37.839
<v Speaker 1>playing young players. Yeah, I mean, and that's why I've

0:36:37.880 --> 0:36:40.439
<v Speaker 1>ranked from the highs. Enough, Okay, where do they break?

0:36:40.480 --> 0:36:42.680
<v Speaker 1>When we come back, We're gonna move on from these

0:36:42.680 --> 0:36:46.040
<v Speaker 1>young players. We talked about the bargain deterans. Let's talk

0:36:46.080 --> 0:36:48.400
<v Speaker 1>about who those bargain veterans are and how much you

0:36:48.400 --> 0:36:53.840
<v Speaker 1>should spend next. The Fantasy Sports Network is ready to

0:36:53.880 --> 0:36:56.200
<v Speaker 1>take you out to the ball game. Our experts and

0:36:56.200 --> 0:36:58.640
<v Speaker 1>analysts are following the Boys of Summer through all one,

0:36:59.160 --> 0:37:01.480
<v Speaker 1>six and two games called the two thousand nineteen MLB

0:37:01.600 --> 0:37:04.840
<v Speaker 1>season with the best Fantasy baseball analysis in the industry.

0:37:04.920 --> 0:37:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Catch the latest news and notes every day to help

0:37:06.960 --> 0:37:09.640
<v Speaker 1>you win your fantasy leagues and your d A best tournaments.

0:37:09.760 --> 0:37:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Will always want you back listening and watching the Fantasy

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:14.160
<v Speaker 1>Sports Network on the f F F and T s Y

0:37:14.239 --> 0:37:16.560
<v Speaker 1>Radio app and the f F T s Y YouTube channel.

0:37:16.640 --> 0:37:19.600
<v Speaker 1>The Fantasy Sports Network where we're root route routing for

0:37:19.800 --> 0:37:24.600
<v Speaker 1>your fantasy baseball team. Morie s Allen two thousand and fifteen,

0:37:24.600 --> 0:37:27.879
<v Speaker 1>two thousands and sixteen European Long Drive Tour Champion two

0:37:27.960 --> 0:37:35.880
<v Speaker 1>thousand seventeen World Number one me personally, I keep my

0:37:35.920 --> 0:37:41.520
<v Speaker 1>game face on me all the time, especially coming out

0:37:41.520 --> 0:37:45.320
<v Speaker 1>of the bucker leaving the range or you're leaving the boys.

0:37:47.000 --> 0:37:49.640
<v Speaker 1>What's your story? Go to Game Based Grooming dot Com

0:37:49.640 --> 0:37:52.840
<v Speaker 1>from all your athletic facial wipes and body cleansing needs.

0:37:52.880 --> 0:37:57.839
<v Speaker 1>In this leave. We're gonna fuss man. We're gonna fight him.

0:37:58.000 --> 0:38:00.560
<v Speaker 1>He got man. We're gonna frae him to their knee.

0:38:00.920 --> 0:38:08.120
<v Speaker 1>It's a woman, that's oh well, the way to the flag?

0:38:08.480 --> 0:38:15.880
<v Speaker 1>Oh Ron James up along, We're out here, are out there.

0:38:15.920 --> 0:38:19.560
<v Speaker 1>They're like Saturday's two pm. E Stern on the Fantasy

0:38:19.600 --> 0:38:23.000
<v Speaker 1>sports networking on your popular podcast providers can't get enough

0:38:23.040 --> 0:38:26.719
<v Speaker 1>fantasy football. Rhoto Experts has launched their NFL three five

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:30.040
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football package, which includes the best math based seasonal

0:38:30.080 --> 0:38:33.160
<v Speaker 1>projections and rankings available anywhere on the Internet, and Davis

0:38:33.239 --> 0:38:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Manig and the Roto Experts are providing dynasty season long betting,

0:38:36.640 --> 0:38:39.239
<v Speaker 1>best ball, and NFL Draft content every day of the

0:38:39.320 --> 0:38:41.399
<v Speaker 1>year to give you an edge regardless of what type

0:38:41.440 --> 0:38:44.200
<v Speaker 1>of fantasy football you play. Say temper cent at Ruto

0:38:44.239 --> 0:38:46.239
<v Speaker 1>experts dot com with the promo code V and T

0:38:46.440 --> 0:38:50.239
<v Speaker 1>s Y. It's the NFL three Fantasy Football package only

0:38:50.520 --> 0:39:04.200
<v Speaker 1>at Rhoto Experts dot com. Pffs, you're on the Fantasy

0:39:04.280 --> 0:39:06.960
<v Speaker 1>Sports radio network. Frank brought up a fantastic point during

0:39:06.960 --> 0:39:09.120
<v Speaker 1>the break. He's like, Okay, we have all these prospects

0:39:09.160 --> 0:39:12.160
<v Speaker 1>are out there. Everybody wants him and understandably sell, but

0:39:12.280 --> 0:39:14.560
<v Speaker 1>in order to do so, you gotta drop him. You

0:39:14.600 --> 0:39:17.480
<v Speaker 1>gotta drop somebody to go out and get him. So

0:39:18.160 --> 0:39:22.239
<v Speaker 1>at what level? Where are we about dropping certain players? Right?

0:39:22.320 --> 0:39:24.960
<v Speaker 1>He wrote up Jason Hayward during the break, Mike, would

0:39:25.000 --> 0:39:28.000
<v Speaker 1>you drop Jason Hayward for any of these guys? Yeah?

0:39:28.120 --> 0:39:30.560
<v Speaker 1>Jason Hayward was fun while he lasted, but he's batting

0:39:30.760 --> 0:39:32.759
<v Speaker 1>below two hundred in the month of May at least,

0:39:32.800 --> 0:39:35.080
<v Speaker 1>though as of yesterday he was So I have no

0:39:35.160 --> 0:39:37.520
<v Speaker 1>problem dropping Jason Hayward. Yeah, I agree with that. He's

0:39:37.560 --> 0:39:39.640
<v Speaker 1>over his last six team batting average down to two

0:39:39.760 --> 0:39:42.239
<v Speaker 1>thirty five. Overall, it was fun while it last. Mike,

0:39:42.280 --> 0:39:43.719
<v Speaker 1>You're right, and I have him in the main event,

0:39:43.840 --> 0:39:47.279
<v Speaker 1>so I'm probably looking to replace him this weekend. Greg, Yeah,

0:39:47.480 --> 0:39:49.560
<v Speaker 1>I think so. It's you. Jason Hayward. I got hot,

0:39:49.880 --> 0:39:53.400
<v Speaker 1>but it's no longer a thing. Would you drop for

0:39:53.560 --> 0:39:56.759
<v Speaker 1>these guys? Frankandy Diaz is battling a bit of an

0:39:56.800 --> 0:39:59.040
<v Speaker 1>ankle injury. I believe we're an injury of some sort.

0:39:59.360 --> 0:40:01.640
<v Speaker 1>Oh man, this is tough one too, because Andy Daz

0:40:01.680 --> 0:40:05.000
<v Speaker 1>has He's been a little inconsistent recently, but overall, I

0:40:05.040 --> 0:40:07.560
<v Speaker 1>mean the numbers have still been pretty good. Nine home runs,

0:40:07.560 --> 0:40:10.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty five runs, twenty two r b I s UM

0:40:10.360 --> 0:40:13.239
<v Speaker 1>two seventy three batting average. I don't think that I

0:40:13.280 --> 0:40:15.919
<v Speaker 1>would Greg, and I understand wanted to get these guys

0:40:15.960 --> 0:40:18.920
<v Speaker 1>on my team, but he's been good. What do you think, Mike, Yeah,

0:40:18.960 --> 0:40:21.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm not dropping Andy. I own Yandy in multiple spots.

0:40:21.560 --> 0:40:23.680
<v Speaker 1>He has been a little up and down this year there,

0:40:23.760 --> 0:40:26.879
<v Speaker 1>but man, he's he's playing every day, he's hitting clean

0:40:26.960 --> 0:40:28.400
<v Speaker 1>up for the race. You want to get, you know,

0:40:28.520 --> 0:40:31.040
<v Speaker 1>some exposure in that line up. I cannot drop the

0:40:31.120 --> 0:40:33.239
<v Speaker 1>andy Ds right now. There. There have to be someone

0:40:33.280 --> 0:40:35.960
<v Speaker 1>else on my team. I would want to drop first. Yeah,

0:40:35.960 --> 0:40:37.800
<v Speaker 1>I agree with that as well. Are you One of

0:40:37.840 --> 0:40:40.120
<v Speaker 1>the questions we were getting into chat and I said,

0:40:40.160 --> 0:40:44.000
<v Speaker 1>it wouldn't drop this player. It's tough. I don't. I

0:40:44.000 --> 0:40:45.799
<v Speaker 1>don't have any exposure. You know, I was off this guy.

0:40:45.880 --> 0:40:49.440
<v Speaker 1>But Joey Vodo, Joey Votto's he's having a term of year,

0:40:49.440 --> 0:40:52.480
<v Speaker 1>he's it seems like he's he's not Joey Vatdo anymore,

0:40:52.800 --> 0:40:54.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, even going back to last year, at LEAs

0:40:54.440 --> 0:40:56.040
<v Speaker 1>last year he hit two eighty four, the power was

0:40:56.080 --> 0:40:58.600
<v Speaker 1>down tremendously, only hit twelve home runs. But this year

0:40:58.640 --> 0:41:00.959
<v Speaker 1>it's kind of like we're getting both of those things together.

0:41:01.000 --> 0:41:03.600
<v Speaker 1>It's not much power and the batting averages to fifteen.

0:41:04.040 --> 0:41:07.560
<v Speaker 1>It's May seventeen. This guy has a strikeout rate that's

0:41:07.600 --> 0:41:10.200
<v Speaker 1>not like Joey Votto. Mike I said, I wouldn't drop him.

0:41:10.719 --> 0:41:12.480
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I'm just thinking too much about like the draft

0:41:12.520 --> 0:41:14.319
<v Speaker 1>capital and understand, you know, a month and a half

0:41:14.360 --> 0:41:16.560
<v Speaker 1>into the season, you can't really think about that much anymore.

0:41:16.640 --> 0:41:18.360
<v Speaker 1>But this is a tough one. I don't think that

0:41:18.400 --> 0:41:21.879
<v Speaker 1>I would drop Joey Vatdo. Would you? No? I wrote

0:41:21.880 --> 0:41:25.359
<v Speaker 1>about Joey Vado this week. I understand how frustrating he's been,

0:41:25.560 --> 0:41:28.960
<v Speaker 1>but I expect the power to increase. Like his heart

0:41:29.040 --> 0:41:31.160
<v Speaker 1>hit rate is thirty nine percent, it's a little bit

0:41:31.200 --> 0:41:32.839
<v Speaker 1>lower than what it was last year, but the fly

0:41:33.000 --> 0:41:35.800
<v Speaker 1>ball rate is a career high forty four point four percent.

0:41:35.960 --> 0:41:39.360
<v Speaker 1>Like those balls should be leaving the park. So his

0:41:39.440 --> 0:41:41.839
<v Speaker 1>home run from flyball ratio right now is even lower

0:41:41.880 --> 0:41:44.120
<v Speaker 1>than it was last year, which was half less than

0:41:44.160 --> 0:41:46.080
<v Speaker 1>half of what it was the year before. I expect

0:41:46.160 --> 0:41:48.960
<v Speaker 1>improvement there, But I get it if you're if you're

0:41:49.000 --> 0:41:51.640
<v Speaker 1>frustrated and you want to put him on your bench shirt.

0:41:51.800 --> 0:41:54.480
<v Speaker 1>But I'm still not ready to drop him just yet.

0:41:54.600 --> 0:41:56.239
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm more likely to trade him. And I

0:41:56.360 --> 0:41:59.560
<v Speaker 1>know this doesn't necessarily like fit the philosophy of what

0:41:59.640 --> 0:42:01.719
<v Speaker 1>we can do, like normally tell people to do sell

0:42:01.840 --> 0:42:04.960
<v Speaker 1>high and and by low, but I still would imagine

0:42:05.000 --> 0:42:07.480
<v Speaker 1>if there's someone in a league somewhere that still has

0:42:07.520 --> 0:42:09.920
<v Speaker 1>faith in Joey Vado based on his name value, So

0:42:09.960 --> 0:42:11.919
<v Speaker 1>I think it'd be more likely to trade him before

0:42:11.960 --> 0:42:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I dropped him, Greg, I agree, who else here is?

0:42:15.480 --> 0:42:18.160
<v Speaker 1>I've been getting questions about Clint Frasier too, but you know,

0:42:18.280 --> 0:42:21.239
<v Speaker 1>my question back to other people is Clint Fraser was

0:42:21.239 --> 0:42:23.160
<v Speaker 1>a highly regarded prospect as well, and he and he

0:42:23.239 --> 0:42:25.600
<v Speaker 1>hits in the Yankee Stadium. I understand this month has

0:42:25.640 --> 0:42:27.600
<v Speaker 1>not been good for him, and kind of spoke about

0:42:27.600 --> 0:42:31.040
<v Speaker 1>this yesterday, Greg that potentially the injury that he suffered

0:42:31.360 --> 0:42:34.160
<v Speaker 1>derailed some of that momentum that he had, and he

0:42:34.239 --> 0:42:36.160
<v Speaker 1>was performing so well in the month of April. Just

0:42:36.239 --> 0:42:38.319
<v Speaker 1>sucks that he got hurt and now he's come back

0:42:38.320 --> 0:42:40.440
<v Speaker 1>in May, and basically since he's come back, he hasn't

0:42:40.480 --> 0:42:44.320
<v Speaker 1>been himself. But he himself is also a prospect, and

0:42:45.120 --> 0:42:46.480
<v Speaker 1>he hits in the middle of a good lineup and

0:42:46.520 --> 0:42:48.920
<v Speaker 1>a good ballpark. So it's like, what are you really

0:42:48.960 --> 0:42:51.120
<v Speaker 1>expecting out of these prospects That's different than what you're

0:42:51.160 --> 0:42:53.279
<v Speaker 1>expecting from Clint Frasier. So I'll throw that one your

0:42:53.320 --> 0:42:56.160
<v Speaker 1>way as well. Mike, would you drop Clint Frasier? That

0:42:56.239 --> 0:43:00.359
<v Speaker 1>one is close. Again, I feel like there's probably would

0:43:00.360 --> 0:43:02.359
<v Speaker 1>be someone on my team I would want to drop more,

0:43:02.440 --> 0:43:06.080
<v Speaker 1>but if not, I would drop him. Not for Nicky

0:43:06.160 --> 0:43:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Lopez or Mercado, but for the other four. I think

0:43:09.640 --> 0:43:11.719
<v Speaker 1>I would. I would take that upside shot. I'm more

0:43:11.760 --> 0:43:13.960
<v Speaker 1>on your side with that point, right, Like Clint Fraser

0:43:14.200 --> 0:43:16.640
<v Speaker 1>was that top prospect earlier, but much like Willie Calhoun,

0:43:16.719 --> 0:43:18.880
<v Speaker 1>that the shine was off and I understand that home

0:43:19.080 --> 0:43:21.120
<v Speaker 1>back to back games, the Fraser was really hot until

0:43:21.120 --> 0:43:22.719
<v Speaker 1>he got hurt. To me let him kind of run

0:43:22.719 --> 0:43:25.520
<v Speaker 1>back into form prospects, you're gonna Evan Flow and you

0:43:25.600 --> 0:43:27.839
<v Speaker 1>have Clint Fraser. You're not hoping that those guys become

0:43:27.840 --> 0:43:29.759
<v Speaker 1>Fraser because he struggled and you probably spent a lot

0:43:29.800 --> 0:43:32.120
<v Speaker 1>of money to get him to Fraser. To me, I'm

0:43:32.440 --> 0:43:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Leasha is longer for me on Clint Frasier. I'm not

0:43:34.160 --> 0:43:36.960
<v Speaker 1>dropping Frasier for these guys. Yeah, I'm closer to you

0:43:37.040 --> 0:43:39.319
<v Speaker 1>on that one as well. Greg, I've surprised. Yeah, yeah,

0:43:39.320 --> 0:43:42.520
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't want to drop him at all. So for me, though,

0:43:42.600 --> 0:43:45.880
<v Speaker 1>I did pick up Nikki Lopez and Mercado each in

0:43:45.920 --> 0:43:48.600
<v Speaker 1>a different home league players, I dropped him. I dropped

0:43:48.640 --> 0:43:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Chevor Richards sadly in one tier, and then another player

0:43:52.520 --> 0:43:55.640
<v Speaker 1>I've been supporting. I've dropped Pablo Lopez in another, and

0:43:55.920 --> 0:43:58.520
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to drop I'm sorry for cutting you off.

0:43:58.560 --> 0:44:00.239
<v Speaker 1>Pabolope was actually the next name I was gonn ask

0:44:00.320 --> 0:44:03.120
<v Speaker 1>you about, Um, Yeah, I don't. I wouldn't want to

0:44:03.239 --> 0:44:05.520
<v Speaker 1>ideally drop him, but I had a lot of pictures

0:44:05.520 --> 0:44:08.920
<v Speaker 1>in depth, and he was just, unfortunately the last picture

0:44:09.000 --> 0:44:11.360
<v Speaker 1>on my roster. So I said, you know what, I

0:44:11.560 --> 0:44:13.479
<v Speaker 1>didn't have any bench beats in this league. I wanted

0:44:13.520 --> 0:44:15.520
<v Speaker 1>to get in on one of these prospects. I had

0:44:15.560 --> 0:44:18.160
<v Speaker 1>to do what I had to do. What about hundred

0:44:18.200 --> 0:44:21.480
<v Speaker 1>pence we just picked up Frank is gone? Well, we

0:44:21.560 --> 0:44:23.080
<v Speaker 1>didn't spend much to gain him. I think we got

0:44:23.520 --> 0:44:28.840
<v Speaker 1>a four dollar bid out of a hundred, so I

0:44:28.880 --> 0:44:30.960
<v Speaker 1>would I would think that in a fifteen team or

0:44:30.960 --> 0:44:32.560
<v Speaker 1>you might be able to find someone else that you

0:44:32.600 --> 0:44:35.080
<v Speaker 1>could drop before Hunter Pence. I mean, he still was

0:44:35.160 --> 0:44:36.600
<v Speaker 1>doing a lot of good things. I don't want to

0:44:36.640 --> 0:44:38.480
<v Speaker 1>pooh pooh him. I know, you know, of course, the

0:44:38.520 --> 0:44:39.880
<v Speaker 1>week that we pick him up seems to be like

0:44:39.960 --> 0:44:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the week that he's gone cold. He hit a home

0:44:41.440 --> 0:44:44.200
<v Speaker 1>run yesterday, but overall this week he hasn't been great.

0:44:44.400 --> 0:44:46.080
<v Speaker 1>But he was still doing a lot of really good things,

0:44:46.080 --> 0:44:47.960
<v Speaker 1>So I don't want to downplay that all too much.

0:44:48.719 --> 0:44:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Is the worst player on your rosters, then yes, I

0:44:50.400 --> 0:44:53.799
<v Speaker 1>could see dropping him for these prospects. Anybody else come

0:44:53.880 --> 0:44:56.560
<v Speaker 1>to mind, gentleman, that's worth discussing. I mean, it's hard

0:44:56.600 --> 0:44:58.160
<v Speaker 1>to obviously do it this way. I'll throw a few

0:44:58.239 --> 0:45:00.640
<v Speaker 1>names out here, guys that got off to starts that

0:45:00.760 --> 0:45:05.040
<v Speaker 1>are kind of cooling down now, three names, Michael franco Um.

0:45:05.360 --> 0:45:09.000
<v Speaker 1>I will also say who else was I looking at here?

0:45:09.080 --> 0:45:13.279
<v Speaker 1>Ki her Nandez I'll throw out, and then Dan's by Swanson,

0:45:13.480 --> 0:45:15.719
<v Speaker 1>three names that have that got off the odd starts

0:45:15.760 --> 0:45:17.520
<v Speaker 1>and are kind of cooling down here. And I think

0:45:17.640 --> 0:45:19.680
<v Speaker 1>especially for these top four, I don't know if I

0:45:19.680 --> 0:45:21.880
<v Speaker 1>would drop all three of them for these other like

0:45:21.960 --> 0:45:24.440
<v Speaker 1>lower prospects that we're that we talked about, but for

0:45:24.520 --> 0:45:26.440
<v Speaker 1>the top four, I think I would be alright dropping

0:45:26.440 --> 0:45:28.360
<v Speaker 1>all three of those guys. So the only one or

0:45:28.360 --> 0:45:30.800
<v Speaker 1>a headstat actually is Michael Franco because he was so

0:45:31.000 --> 0:45:33.000
<v Speaker 1>good and he's in that lab and in that ballpark

0:45:33.160 --> 0:45:34.879
<v Speaker 1>where I really has you have him in a league

0:45:34.920 --> 0:45:38.040
<v Speaker 1>man like he's he's we have them together. He's like

0:45:38.239 --> 0:45:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the batting averages all the way down to thirty eight.

0:45:40.080 --> 0:45:41.960
<v Speaker 1>It looks at bat ball day like he's not hitting

0:45:42.000 --> 0:45:44.680
<v Speaker 1>the ball hard to It's like, I think that first

0:45:44.719 --> 0:45:46.200
<v Speaker 1>month might have just been a little bit flukey. What

0:45:46.200 --> 0:45:49.319
<v Speaker 1>do you think about those three players? Mike, Yeah, I'm

0:45:49.320 --> 0:45:51.680
<v Speaker 1>okay to me. The one I had the most pause

0:45:51.719 --> 0:45:54.600
<v Speaker 1>about is is Dan's by Swanson actually because he plays

0:45:54.680 --> 0:45:56.879
<v Speaker 1>that premium position. I picked him up in a league

0:45:57.080 --> 0:45:59.279
<v Speaker 1>and I've been happy with the production I've got, and

0:45:59.360 --> 0:46:01.319
<v Speaker 1>I know it's up and down with him as well,

0:46:01.440 --> 0:46:05.080
<v Speaker 1>but again former top prospect, high pedigree. But for those

0:46:05.120 --> 0:46:07.800
<v Speaker 1>top four, I would drop all three of them. I

0:46:07.880 --> 0:46:09.680
<v Speaker 1>wanted to throw two names to you guys, because these

0:46:09.680 --> 0:46:11.600
<v Speaker 1>are two names that I've gotten a lot this week.

0:46:12.160 --> 0:46:17.279
<v Speaker 1>Uh it's Craig Kimbrell and Dallas Kiko. So I think

0:46:17.320 --> 0:46:19.640
<v Speaker 1>it depends on where you're at in the standings, Greg,

0:46:20.360 --> 0:46:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Like if you're at the top and you're gonna need

0:46:23.080 --> 0:46:25.280
<v Speaker 1>a closer, like we know Craig Kimberll is gonna be signed,

0:46:25.440 --> 0:46:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Someone's gonna sign, Someone's gonna sign Kiko. Also, there's no

0:46:28.120 --> 0:46:30.200
<v Speaker 1>way I could drop them because they have trade value.

0:46:30.880 --> 0:46:32.839
<v Speaker 1>I'd be more likely to drop Kaiko than I would

0:46:33.239 --> 0:46:35.279
<v Speaker 1>I can't drop I'm not droping Kimber. Like when he

0:46:35.400 --> 0:46:37.960
<v Speaker 1>comes back in June, he could go back to be

0:46:38.040 --> 0:46:41.279
<v Speaker 1>in the top five top ten closes. So I would

0:46:41.320 --> 0:46:43.600
<v Speaker 1>be more likely to drop Kaiko than I would Kimber.

0:46:43.760 --> 0:46:45.439
<v Speaker 1>I'm not gonna drop either. And I think it also

0:46:45.480 --> 0:46:46.920
<v Speaker 1>depends on where you're at in the standings, Like if

0:46:46.920 --> 0:46:49.560
<v Speaker 1>you're falling behind Greg, you can only have so many

0:46:49.600 --> 0:46:53.520
<v Speaker 1>players that your stash, stash prospects. You're trying to stash

0:46:53.520 --> 0:46:55.839
<v Speaker 1>these guys signed, yet you're waiting for players to come

0:46:55.840 --> 0:46:58.520
<v Speaker 1>back from injury. It's tough. I just totally get it.

0:46:58.560 --> 0:47:00.440
<v Speaker 1>But that's that's the position you're in. You how one

0:47:00.640 --> 0:47:02.680
<v Speaker 1>or both of these guys training with somebody that can

0:47:02.680 --> 0:47:06.560
<v Speaker 1>afford to wait. That's what I've been saying, Like we've

0:47:06.640 --> 0:47:08.560
<v Speaker 1>held out this long, we have like two or three

0:47:08.600 --> 0:47:11.600
<v Speaker 1>more weeks to go. I think Kimbrella, once he signs,

0:47:11.640 --> 0:47:13.200
<v Speaker 1>he's on a major league roster like I would be

0:47:13.239 --> 0:47:15.360
<v Speaker 1>surprised to see him need rehab like a like a

0:47:15.400 --> 0:47:17.920
<v Speaker 1>minor league stint at all, and the Dallas Kiko might

0:47:17.920 --> 0:47:20.440
<v Speaker 1>be the same thing. One other name though, just just

0:47:20.600 --> 0:47:22.799
<v Speaker 1>because I've been thinking about the names that I've been

0:47:22.800 --> 0:47:24.960
<v Speaker 1>getting questions about a lot, and this one is a

0:47:25.040 --> 0:47:27.160
<v Speaker 1>player who I liked a lot heading into the year.

0:47:27.160 --> 0:47:29.520
<v Speaker 1>It's Jesse Winker. Getting a lot of questions should I

0:47:29.560 --> 0:47:33.279
<v Speaker 1>drop Winker? Mainly for Riley and Calhoun. I love Jesse Winker,

0:47:33.320 --> 0:47:35.200
<v Speaker 1>He's my guy. We spoke about this the other day

0:47:35.280 --> 0:47:39.200
<v Speaker 1>to Greg, and initially my response was, well, what are

0:47:39.239 --> 0:47:42.120
<v Speaker 1>you expecting these prospects to do that we're that we're

0:47:42.160 --> 0:47:45.080
<v Speaker 1>not expecting from Jesse Winker? Right, So kind of similar

0:47:45.080 --> 0:47:48.280
<v Speaker 1>to Clint Fraser, where he's a former top prospect himself.

0:47:48.400 --> 0:47:50.239
<v Speaker 1>He hits in a good ballpark, and I think as

0:47:50.280 --> 0:47:52.480
<v Speaker 1>a weather starts to heat up more and more in Cincinnati,

0:47:52.560 --> 0:47:54.200
<v Speaker 1>the ball is gonna start to fly out there. And

0:47:54.280 --> 0:47:57.080
<v Speaker 1>while the batting average is to twenty one, obviously that's

0:47:57.320 --> 0:47:59.600
<v Speaker 1>not ideal. This was a guy that at every level,

0:48:00.280 --> 0:48:01.759
<v Speaker 1>the one thing you could depend on him to do

0:48:01.880 --> 0:48:04.239
<v Speaker 1>was hit for batting every so I would kind of

0:48:04.320 --> 0:48:05.799
<v Speaker 1>hang my head off Matt when it comes to Jesse

0:48:05.920 --> 0:48:09.680
<v Speaker 1>Winker and still hitting the ball extremely hard, hard hit rate,

0:48:10.200 --> 0:48:13.279
<v Speaker 1>hits too many groundballs from my liking overall, but again,

0:48:13.360 --> 0:48:15.440
<v Speaker 1>good ballpark, he hits in the middle of a good lineup.

0:48:15.719 --> 0:48:18.640
<v Speaker 1>My question is, what are you expecting these prospects to

0:48:18.680 --> 0:48:21.719
<v Speaker 1>do that we're not expecting Jesse Winker to do. You

0:48:21.840 --> 0:48:23.880
<v Speaker 1>do have the nine home runs from Winker. Obviously r

0:48:23.920 --> 0:48:25.560
<v Speaker 1>b I s aren't there, but it's not really his fault.

0:48:25.560 --> 0:48:27.880
<v Speaker 1>He's got fifteen runs most of the season he was

0:48:27.920 --> 0:48:31.000
<v Speaker 1>leading off. Yeah, I know, I know. Um. I think

0:48:31.040 --> 0:48:35.040
<v Speaker 1>you can expect more power out of Riley, potentially Calhoun.

0:48:35.120 --> 0:48:37.239
<v Speaker 1>I think the power for Winker is going like I

0:48:37.320 --> 0:48:39.440
<v Speaker 1>think his average is gonna skyrocket and he's gonna not

0:48:39.480 --> 0:48:43.319
<v Speaker 1>gonna hit two fourteen babbit. But he's also he hits

0:48:43.320 --> 0:48:45.120
<v Speaker 1>the ball on the ground a ton, Frank, So he's

0:48:45.160 --> 0:48:47.279
<v Speaker 1>really reliant, like you said, So he's relying on that

0:48:47.800 --> 0:48:50.320
<v Speaker 1>high home run and fly ball rate. To me, I

0:48:50.360 --> 0:48:52.480
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't bank on this power pace keeping up, but I

0:48:52.560 --> 0:48:53.920
<v Speaker 1>think the average is gonna get a lot. Do you

0:48:53.960 --> 0:48:55.759
<v Speaker 1>remember those minor league numbers where he didn't have all

0:48:55.800 --> 0:48:57.640
<v Speaker 1>those home runs came before the juice balls in the

0:48:57.719 --> 0:49:00.600
<v Speaker 1>minor leagues, and that even though I'm even this year,

0:49:00.719 --> 0:49:04.279
<v Speaker 1>the nine runs so far this year, like home run

0:49:04.320 --> 0:49:06.560
<v Speaker 1>a fly ball rate is pretty high. Like, can he

0:49:06.800 --> 0:49:09.319
<v Speaker 1>is it sustainable? Could he sustain it? I mean over

0:49:09.360 --> 0:49:11.080
<v Speaker 1>the course of the season, shirt, But I don't know

0:49:11.080 --> 0:49:13.839
<v Speaker 1>if I want to pank on that is rather high

0:49:13.880 --> 0:49:17.040
<v Speaker 1>for what it's worth. All the other projection systems on

0:49:17.160 --> 0:49:20.919
<v Speaker 1>fan Graphs have him for between eleven and seventeen home runs,

0:49:21.120 --> 0:49:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the in between two sixty six and

0:49:23.480 --> 0:49:26.360
<v Speaker 1>to seventy three batting average, so pretty good batting average

0:49:26.400 --> 0:49:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the rest away from him, and you know, the power

0:49:29.080 --> 0:49:31.160
<v Speaker 1>is all over the place, but the bat Derrick Cardi's

0:49:31.160 --> 0:49:33.600
<v Speaker 1>projections I mean pretty smart. Dude knows a lot more

0:49:33.640 --> 0:49:35.440
<v Speaker 1>than me and you do. Greg. He has him for

0:49:35.480 --> 0:49:37.480
<v Speaker 1>seventeen home runs the rest of the way. That would

0:49:37.480 --> 0:49:40.360
<v Speaker 1>give him overall, you're gonna drop a twenty six home

0:49:40.440 --> 0:49:42.680
<v Speaker 1>run hitter, not to seventy three the rest of the way.

0:49:43.400 --> 0:49:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Let me ask you one last one time. I don't

0:49:44.960 --> 0:49:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't want to drop him, Frank. Before we get

0:49:46.560 --> 0:49:52.360
<v Speaker 1>to the veterans here these ark Daniel Murphy. Oh, this

0:49:52.480 --> 0:49:55.479
<v Speaker 1>is a very relevant question right now, Greg, I would

0:49:55.520 --> 0:49:58.560
<v Speaker 1>not Okay, I think I think you're just giving up

0:49:58.560 --> 0:50:00.560
<v Speaker 1>a little bit too early, and we what his upside

0:50:00.600 --> 0:50:03.800
<v Speaker 1>could be. Floria, would you drop Hayes's aguilar. That's a

0:50:03.840 --> 0:50:09.680
<v Speaker 1>good one. Uh, he's a regular. That's a really tough one.

0:50:09.840 --> 0:50:12.200
<v Speaker 1>I would say no to Murphy for sure, although I

0:50:12.200 --> 0:50:14.080
<v Speaker 1>don't know if he's healthy. Frank, that's why I had

0:50:14.440 --> 0:50:16.319
<v Speaker 1>I can't decide if I want to trade for him

0:50:16.960 --> 0:50:20.920
<v Speaker 1>to trade with Floria. We keep going back and forth, Florida. Frank,

0:50:21.000 --> 0:50:22.400
<v Speaker 1>tell me about your proposal. I thought it was real.

0:50:22.440 --> 0:50:24.360
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was fairly offered it to him. I

0:50:24.400 --> 0:50:25.440
<v Speaker 1>just threw it out there. I was like, Hey, Joe

0:50:25.520 --> 0:50:28.760
<v Speaker 1>must Grove, I think. I. I don't think it's unfair.

0:50:28.960 --> 0:50:32.480
<v Speaker 1>My fear is Daniel Murphy's rushed back, and if he's

0:50:32.480 --> 0:50:34.080
<v Speaker 1>going to land on the I l again because that

0:50:34.080 --> 0:50:35.560
<v Speaker 1>would do me no good then, because I'd be in

0:50:35.600 --> 0:50:38.160
<v Speaker 1>the same position I am now. Um, that's the only

0:50:38.239 --> 0:50:42.520
<v Speaker 1>reason I have a little hesitation. Haze sagular for the

0:50:42.840 --> 0:50:46.880
<v Speaker 1>top guys. Yes, for Lopez and Mercado, No, I agree

0:50:46.880 --> 0:50:49.120
<v Speaker 1>with that. We can follow your rid of him. We

0:50:49.160 --> 0:50:52.359
<v Speaker 1>get rid of them, all right, Hey, Floria, who's gonna

0:50:52.400 --> 0:50:56.279
<v Speaker 1>play first base for us? Anyway? We'll figure it out?

0:50:56.840 --> 0:50:59.759
<v Speaker 1>Is it Ronnie Rodriguez is eligible at first? Miss run?

0:51:01.360 --> 0:51:08.560
<v Speaker 1>Ronnie's crushing it? Man? Actually short stop eligibility? Who has

0:51:08.640 --> 0:51:14.160
<v Speaker 1>every everything? Everything? Um, Floria counts at first? I know

0:51:14.360 --> 0:51:16.640
<v Speaker 1>this is a no. I just want to throw it out.

0:51:17.400 --> 0:51:24.279
<v Speaker 1>Would you drop Alex Wood for them? Yes? Wow? What

0:51:26.400 --> 0:51:29.239
<v Speaker 1>would changed? Once he had a set back? That's when

0:51:29.280 --> 0:51:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I was like, all right, we could drop him. But

0:51:31.680 --> 0:51:33.520
<v Speaker 1>before that, it was like he's gonna be back first

0:51:33.560 --> 0:51:36.080
<v Speaker 1>week of May. It's like the week before May, and

0:51:36.120 --> 0:51:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Greg's like, yo, let's cut him. Yeah, And I was right,

0:51:40.320 --> 0:51:45.120
<v Speaker 1>you were right. After back, I was, man, I stand

0:51:45.200 --> 0:51:47.319
<v Speaker 1>by the fact that we didn't need to drop him.

0:51:50.040 --> 0:51:51.960
<v Speaker 1>You know what, You're wrong because we have to drop

0:51:52.080 --> 0:51:54.439
<v Speaker 1>Zack Fflyn and then spend money to get him back. Yeah,

0:51:54.440 --> 0:51:56.200
<v Speaker 1>but we didn't spend that much, so I didn't want

0:51:56.200 --> 0:51:59.320
<v Speaker 1>to drop back. I did not want to drop Zach Eflyn.

0:51:59.760 --> 0:52:01.680
<v Speaker 1>So you guys are basically blaming me. I was sleeping.

0:52:01.880 --> 0:52:04.440
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't my fault, well, I asked Mike. I was like,

0:52:04.440 --> 0:52:05.600
<v Speaker 1>all right, well, what do you want to drop? It

0:52:06.400 --> 0:52:08.359
<v Speaker 1>was he could have an axe? Would I think we had?

0:52:08.480 --> 0:52:10.440
<v Speaker 1>So we had another bid on Alex. Would I think

0:52:10.440 --> 0:52:13.480
<v Speaker 1>we needed like a middle infield of that week? Pomping

0:52:13.520 --> 0:52:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Alex would and we didn't get any. Oh the trials

0:52:19.320 --> 0:52:22.040
<v Speaker 1>and tribulations of teaming the two people, Mike, why does

0:52:22.080 --> 0:52:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Zach Miller suck? Suck? Zach Wheeler just can't. It's against

0:52:27.600 --> 0:52:30.879
<v Speaker 1>the Nationals, that's it. Like I tweeted before this last

0:52:30.920 --> 0:52:33.560
<v Speaker 1>start his numbers from that blow up start against the

0:52:33.640 --> 0:52:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Nats before this last week start, and he was pitching

0:52:36.760 --> 0:52:39.040
<v Speaker 1>like an ace man below three e r A, below

0:52:39.120 --> 0:52:41.839
<v Speaker 1>three eight in the r A indicators. Oh well over

0:52:41.920 --> 0:52:44.600
<v Speaker 1>a strikeout for in giving ten like in three of

0:52:44.680 --> 0:52:47.120
<v Speaker 1>his last four outings. So it's just for some reason

0:52:47.320 --> 0:52:49.840
<v Speaker 1>when he faces the Nationals, you have mind permission to

0:52:49.880 --> 0:52:54.120
<v Speaker 1>sit him, other than that he's been pitching well this year. Well, Mike,

0:52:54.160 --> 0:52:55.920
<v Speaker 1>would you like to know who was next started against?

0:52:56.120 --> 0:52:59.880
<v Speaker 1>It's against the national Let's go. You got a two

0:53:00.000 --> 0:53:03.640
<v Speaker 1>start week next week, Nationals and Tigers. So basically you're

0:53:03.640 --> 0:53:06.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna get one five inning, six earned run performance and

0:53:06.800 --> 0:53:10.360
<v Speaker 1>probably one seven enning let's say two earned run performance.

0:53:10.440 --> 0:53:15.120
<v Speaker 1>That's gonna be your Zach Wheeler double start next week, right, fantastic?

0:53:16.440 --> 0:53:20.120
<v Speaker 1>This is ridiculous. Why does Patrick Corbyn Frank who you

0:53:20.560 --> 0:53:23.160
<v Speaker 1>select the Zack Wheeler over Frank? Did? She gets the

0:53:23.239 --> 0:53:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Mets every time? Dominate them because the Mets suck the Nationals? Well,

0:53:28.280 --> 0:53:30.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, Zach Wheeler probably wishes that he could face

0:53:30.200 --> 0:53:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the Mets too. It's not his fault. That's a fair point.

0:53:34.160 --> 0:53:37.920
<v Speaker 1>You see. I don't want to do I don't want

0:53:37.960 --> 0:53:39.920
<v Speaker 1>to do this, Floria. I really don't. What do you

0:53:40.000 --> 0:53:43.040
<v Speaker 1>care anyway? Like I have main event with Greg Binen,

0:53:43.120 --> 0:53:45.000
<v Speaker 1>not with you, so you shouldn't care. The guys are

0:53:45.040 --> 0:53:49.480
<v Speaker 1>three geese will stick together. But um, I don't want

0:53:49.480 --> 0:53:51.920
<v Speaker 1>to do this to Flora. But I just feel like

0:53:51.920 --> 0:53:53.800
<v Speaker 1>you're at that point, like remember that first week April,

0:53:53.840 --> 0:53:57.319
<v Speaker 1>whether than that, every Mets Fani was like, now we're

0:53:57.360 --> 0:53:58.960
<v Speaker 1>in May, where we always are, and they're all just

0:53:59.040 --> 0:54:04.719
<v Speaker 1>like we suck. Ye. Yes, it is just therustrating part.

0:54:05.560 --> 0:54:08.279
<v Speaker 1>It's it's like clockwork. The Mets, for some reason, are

0:54:08.560 --> 0:54:10.960
<v Speaker 1>always awesome in April. They always are going to win

0:54:11.000 --> 0:54:14.000
<v Speaker 1>an opening day. We know that, but from May on

0:54:14.160 --> 0:54:15.879
<v Speaker 1>they just can't figure it out. I do think they're

0:54:15.920 --> 0:54:18.360
<v Speaker 1>going to be better this year than they were last,

0:54:18.520 --> 0:54:20.759
<v Speaker 1>but to think that they were going to win the

0:54:20.800 --> 0:54:23.080
<v Speaker 1>division if coming into the year I did not think

0:54:23.120 --> 0:54:25.080
<v Speaker 1>they were making the playoffs, well, you know it is

0:54:25.120 --> 0:54:26.719
<v Speaker 1>a dog fight though. If you look at the NL

0:54:26.719 --> 0:54:29.240
<v Speaker 1>East right now, the Phillies are leading in A nineteen,

0:54:29.239 --> 0:54:31.239
<v Speaker 1>so there's only five games over five hundred and like

0:54:31.320 --> 0:54:33.400
<v Speaker 1>the Braves are close. The Mats as like up and

0:54:33.440 --> 0:54:34.879
<v Speaker 1>down as they've been there, only three and a half

0:54:34.920 --> 0:54:37.240
<v Speaker 1>games out, and you know it could be worse. Mikey

0:54:37.520 --> 0:54:39.799
<v Speaker 1>Greg and I both chose the Washington Nationals to win

0:54:39.880 --> 0:54:41.920
<v Speaker 1>the n EL easis here and we both had Anthony

0:54:42.000 --> 0:54:44.439
<v Speaker 1>Randon as our National League MVP, so it would be worse.

0:54:45.719 --> 0:54:48.800
<v Speaker 1>He looked like it until he got hurt. Yeah, and

0:54:48.920 --> 0:54:53.160
<v Speaker 1>we we we discounted some player named Christian Yelloch that. Yeah,

0:54:53.200 --> 0:54:54.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean a lot of people. My dad actually chose

0:54:54.960 --> 0:54:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Yellows to be the MVP two years in a row

0:54:56.640 --> 0:55:00.040
<v Speaker 1>when he was on the show that he did. I

0:55:00.640 --> 0:55:02.280
<v Speaker 1>shout out of my mom too. By the way, happy birthday,

0:55:02.320 --> 0:55:07.759
<v Speaker 1>Mom's birthday tonight, Happy birthday Frank's mom. Mom. I'm going

0:55:07.840 --> 0:55:09.879
<v Speaker 1>by their house tonight a little, a little party. Hard.

0:55:10.160 --> 0:55:15.320
<v Speaker 1>That's awesome. Your father selected. He did not. Oh gosh,

0:55:15.520 --> 0:55:17.680
<v Speaker 1>he's like the no one ran all right, not a

0:55:17.680 --> 0:55:21.759
<v Speaker 1>bad not a bad no I got. I got Christian

0:55:21.840 --> 0:55:23.839
<v Speaker 1>Yellow ten overall in our home league. I'm just gonna

0:55:23.880 --> 0:55:27.200
<v Speaker 1>say that, that's great. I don't know why I was

0:55:27.239 --> 0:55:29.279
<v Speaker 1>planning on taking Chris Sale and I got him. I

0:55:29.400 --> 0:55:31.840
<v Speaker 1>was so happy. So I had I had third overall,

0:55:32.200 --> 0:55:36.160
<v Speaker 1>and I took Max Scherzer because it's I wanted pitching.

0:55:36.640 --> 0:55:38.359
<v Speaker 1>You know, my top three picks in that leak where

0:55:38.400 --> 0:55:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Max Scherzer, Freddie Freeman, and Jehan Carlos stand, all three

0:55:41.160 --> 0:55:44.200
<v Speaker 1>have been quite underwhelming. That's why I'm two and four.

0:55:45.200 --> 0:55:47.640
<v Speaker 1>He had a home run last night, But overall, it

0:55:47.840 --> 0:55:50.480
<v Speaker 1>just feels like he hasn't done enough this year, at

0:55:50.560 --> 0:55:52.520
<v Speaker 1>least not what I was expecting from And then John

0:55:52.560 --> 0:55:57.319
<v Speaker 1>Carlos Stanton, that's just a dumpster fire flor to this weekend. Uh,

0:55:57.719 --> 0:55:59.640
<v Speaker 1>this is more like a chill weekend. I have a

0:55:59.680 --> 0:56:01.960
<v Speaker 1>bunch of trips coming up in June and July, so

0:56:02.000 --> 0:56:05.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm really looking at York. Yes, I haven't booked New

0:56:05.560 --> 0:56:07.080
<v Speaker 1>York yet, but it's either going to be the middle

0:56:07.120 --> 0:56:08.839
<v Speaker 1>week of June or the middle week of July. I'm

0:56:08.840 --> 0:56:10.320
<v Speaker 1>going back and forth on that. But I'm going to

0:56:10.360 --> 0:56:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Florida the weekend next I won't be able to do

0:56:12.719 --> 0:56:15.520
<v Speaker 1>BFFs that week. Sorry, guys. I'm going to Mexico one

0:56:15.560 --> 0:56:17.959
<v Speaker 1>week soon. I'm going to San fran It's gonna gonna

0:56:17.960 --> 0:56:23.760
<v Speaker 1>be exacting for Mexico. That's cool. And certainly Florida, Florida, Florida, Mexico.

0:56:23.800 --> 0:56:25.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure if I can. Yeah, they don't let

0:56:25.800 --> 0:56:28.480
<v Speaker 1>you have WiFi. That all right for Mike, Florida. We

0:56:28.520 --> 0:56:31.279
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it, talent. Talk to you next week, but sounds good.

0:56:31.360 --> 0:56:34.320
<v Speaker 1>Thank you. Guys. Already out over two including Jason starts

0:56:34.360 --> 0:56:37.520
<v Speaker 1>week you Tiny question is up next around via maps