WEBVTT - 4/30, Part 1: MLB recap, Red Sox closer situation, Pollock injury, and more...

0:00:00.560 --> 0:00:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, thanks for downloading the podcast, and remember, if you

0:00:03.680 --> 0:00:07.160
<v Speaker 1>want to listen live, download the I Heart Radio app,

0:00:07.240 --> 0:00:10.080
<v Speaker 1>download the tune in app and just search for Fantasy

0:00:10.240 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Sports Radio Network and you can listen to this program live. Also,

0:00:14.920 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>if you want to watch the video of this podcast,

0:00:17.600 --> 0:00:21.000
<v Speaker 1>check us out on YouTube, on Twitch, or on Periscope

0:00:21.120 --> 0:00:24.840
<v Speaker 1>and type in you guess due Fantasy Sports Network. You'll

0:00:24.880 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>find us there. Enjoy the show and thanks for listening.

0:00:30.240 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to the Fantasy Sports Radio Network Fantasy Best

0:00:38.800 --> 0:00:52.400
<v Speaker 1>Friends Forever, m to to to Do Do Do Do

0:00:52.840 --> 0:01:00.120
<v Speaker 1>Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do Do do Yeah.

0:01:00.200 --> 0:01:04.440
<v Speaker 1>This is the Fantasy Best Friends Forever here in the

0:01:04.440 --> 0:01:07.560
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Sports Radio Network alongside Frankie stamp Well. I am

0:01:07.640 --> 0:01:11.679
<v Speaker 1>Greg Susman. Frankie. What's happening but Greg a happy Tuesday.

0:01:12.000 --> 0:01:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Lots to recap from last night? It Alex for dugo time, Greggy,

0:01:15.840 --> 0:01:20.319
<v Speaker 1>how about that one show planned Baseball? First hour? Um

0:01:20.720 --> 0:01:22.399
<v Speaker 1>pull the second hour? You gotta recap some of the

0:01:22.480 --> 0:01:26.560
<v Speaker 1>NFL Draft top skill position players that were drafted, what

0:01:26.600 --> 0:01:32.960
<v Speaker 1>it means for Fantasy football redraft, dynasty fits and where

0:01:34.520 --> 0:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>wets to talk about? Yeah? Very excited to do both

0:01:37.360 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 1>sports today. June will join us for that as well

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:45.120
<v Speaker 1>as Yeah, it'll be good. It'll be really really good

0:01:45.560 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 1>to do that and and have that have football conversation back.

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:51.320
<v Speaker 1>I did a little bit with g J, Zack and

0:01:51.360 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 1>Ryes and a fanal probably asked him to come on.

0:01:54.160 --> 0:01:58.080
<v Speaker 1>Probably we got Jim. We'll get him at some point. Yeah, yeah,

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 1>look very happy to have Jim Fantasy test obviously, but

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 1>I want to try and get as many different guests

0:02:04.440 --> 0:02:06.280
<v Speaker 1>as possible. Yeah, of course. So I took to j

0:02:06.360 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>J about a time before. I took j J about

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:10.440
<v Speaker 1>it yesterday, and he's got some feelings and so I

0:02:10.440 --> 0:02:12.560
<v Speaker 1>know where he's at, so I can. I feel like

0:02:12.639 --> 0:02:15.679
<v Speaker 1>I know more information now, So that's good. I'd sleep

0:02:15.720 --> 0:02:19.280
<v Speaker 1>lest night, you know, I slept well. I was up

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:21.640
<v Speaker 1>vividly at three thirty, Like I had like a very

0:02:21.720 --> 0:02:26.440
<v Speaker 1>vivid dream and this this is not funny, but um,

0:02:26.560 --> 0:02:30.680
<v Speaker 1>Chris's mom is having surgery in a little bit, um,

0:02:30.720 --> 0:02:32.079
<v Speaker 1>and I had a dream that I was in the

0:02:32.080 --> 0:02:34.359
<v Speaker 1>hospital having the same surgery, not with Chris's mom, but

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:37.800
<v Speaker 1>I guess because it was in my head during the day. Yeah,

0:02:38.000 --> 0:02:40.200
<v Speaker 1>I was having that surgery today and I was fine,

0:02:40.240 --> 0:02:43.079
<v Speaker 1>Like the surgery has under anesthesia. Like four hours later,

0:02:43.080 --> 0:02:44.680
<v Speaker 1>I woke up fine and like they said you could

0:02:44.680 --> 0:02:46.880
<v Speaker 1>only drink certain fluids. Was like now I'm ready for

0:02:46.919 --> 0:02:48.679
<v Speaker 1>like real food. I was like trying to stress the

0:02:48.720 --> 0:02:50.240
<v Speaker 1>doctor and were watching a movie and I woke up.

0:02:50.280 --> 0:02:51.920
<v Speaker 1>I thinking like the morning it was like three thirty

0:02:51.919 --> 0:02:54.440
<v Speaker 1>in the morning, and then I had it was very strange,

0:02:54.720 --> 0:02:56.400
<v Speaker 1>and then like closer to the time I wake up,

0:02:57.040 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I was having like very vivid I don't know, memories

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:03.160
<v Speaker 1>or dreams of thoughts that like Todd Fraser would make

0:03:03.200 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 1>a great manager Salt and Pepper. It was like it

0:03:07.760 --> 0:03:09.280
<v Speaker 1>was like Todd Fraser. For some reason, I had this

0:03:09.360 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 1>vivid thought that Todd Fraser like future manager in the mats.

0:03:11.880 --> 0:03:14.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm just like, all right, maybe do you remember your

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:17.720
<v Speaker 1>dreams often right when I'm right when I wake up?

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:20.240
<v Speaker 1>I do not, like not at this point, like the

0:03:20.280 --> 0:03:23.320
<v Speaker 1>details that I remembered hours ago, I don't know. I

0:03:23.360 --> 0:03:28.880
<v Speaker 1>don't remember at all now, you know. But when I

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:30.360
<v Speaker 1>was in it, like when I woke up, like I

0:03:30.840 --> 0:03:35.440
<v Speaker 1>one thousand percent, I remember them very vividly, like characters

0:03:35.440 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 1>that are in it and thoughts. Yeah, I never remember

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>any of my dreams when you just wake up, it's

0:03:39.800 --> 0:03:43.920
<v Speaker 1>like you remember anything. Yeah, I said it pretty late

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>last night because I was watching a Nuggets game. Great game,

0:03:46.600 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 1>great game between the Nuggets and the Blazer. So I

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:50.360
<v Speaker 1>stood up to watch that, a little bit of back

0:03:50.360 --> 0:03:53.640
<v Speaker 1>and forth. Nuggets pulled away monster game from Yoki. Um

0:03:54.040 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 1>watch some baseball. Early on, I was watching the Rod

0:03:57.680 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 1>versus Mantas. I was doing great there, I was watching.

0:04:00.840 --> 0:04:02.320
<v Speaker 1>I was watching a lot of sports last night because

0:04:02.360 --> 0:04:05.200
<v Speaker 1>I was between that the Mets because Wheeler was on

0:04:05.240 --> 0:04:07.960
<v Speaker 1>the mound, um and we'll be network on so I

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:11.440
<v Speaker 1>switched between that. The early game. I had that going on.

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 1>There's just a lot of sports. One then at raw

0:04:14.440 --> 0:04:17.200
<v Speaker 1>so well I'm laughing. Yeah, I'm probably just gonna take

0:04:17.240 --> 0:04:19.240
<v Speaker 1>a break from wrestling until summer stime. I wish I

0:04:19.240 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 1>could too. I wish I wish I could too. I

0:04:21.600 --> 0:04:23.680
<v Speaker 1>don't have enough time to watch for artsma guy. Yeah,

0:04:23.680 --> 0:04:25.479
<v Speaker 1>I mean I just I, like I said, I do

0:04:25.520 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 1>it in about it, like fast forward the entire show.

0:04:28.760 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't have time for it. You got that. I

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:33.679
<v Speaker 1>watched Killed Me Eve last night as well. I watched

0:04:33.680 --> 0:04:37.960
<v Speaker 1>the You think it was pretty cool? It's funny, right, Yeah,

0:04:38.040 --> 0:04:40.240
<v Speaker 1>I liked it all right, cool, Yeah, it was interesting.

0:04:40.400 --> 0:04:42.720
<v Speaker 1>I watched last week. Oh I did. It was good. Yeah,

0:04:42.760 --> 0:04:45.479
<v Speaker 1>I do look forward to watching more. It's very quick.

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:49.279
<v Speaker 1>Seemed to somewhat enjoy it. Twenty it's long. Yeah, that's great.

0:04:49.680 --> 0:04:53.760
<v Speaker 1>Speaking of which, what's up? Much better at choosing shows

0:04:53.760 --> 0:04:55.680
<v Speaker 1>than King. She put on a show just before that.

0:04:55.760 --> 0:04:59.479
<v Speaker 1>She's like, let's try this out. It's funny show, is it?

0:05:00.040 --> 0:05:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I gotta I don't even remember the name.

0:05:01.640 --> 0:05:04.120
<v Speaker 1>It was so bad. You know anything tails about it?

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:08.719
<v Speaker 1>Something about leaving Netflix? It is it leaving? Is that

0:05:08.720 --> 0:05:11.000
<v Speaker 1>the name of the show. I don't know. Okay, I

0:05:11.000 --> 0:05:13.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I'll text her, I'll find out. I'll get

0:05:13.040 --> 0:05:15.840
<v Speaker 1>it to you before shows over, Okay. I mean I'm

0:05:15.880 --> 0:05:18.880
<v Speaker 1>always interested. Yeah, I don't remember the name of it. It

0:05:18.800 --> 0:05:22.840
<v Speaker 1>It was so bad. It like random, like comedy, like

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:25.920
<v Speaker 1>skits together. Oh yeah, I heard about this. It's not good.

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:28.320
<v Speaker 1>I heard it was not good. I heard it was bad.

0:05:28.960 --> 0:05:31.520
<v Speaker 1>She's like, so you didn't like it, right? I didn't

0:05:31.520 --> 0:05:33.120
<v Speaker 1>want to tell the truth. They didn't, you know what.

0:05:33.560 --> 0:05:35.040
<v Speaker 1>You gotta be honest. I was like, oh yeah, I

0:05:35.080 --> 0:05:37.039
<v Speaker 1>didn't really like it, but deep down I was like

0:05:37.080 --> 0:05:41.400
<v Speaker 1>this is the worst. And then what did she say

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:44.400
<v Speaker 1>about brock Meyer. She was like, you know, it's pretty interesting.

0:05:44.440 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 1>It's good. Okay, you're gonna take it. She probably hates

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:50.720
<v Speaker 1>it too, so I remember in the same boat. So

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the problem was, after I watched brock Meyer season, like

0:05:53.240 --> 0:05:55.720
<v Speaker 1>the first season, I walked down the apartment saying, I'm

0:05:55.800 --> 0:05:59.360
<v Speaker 1>Jim brock Meyer, and she was like, I think hate that.

0:05:59.600 --> 0:06:01.880
<v Speaker 1>Please off. At least I couldn't. I couldn't stop for

0:06:01.960 --> 0:06:05.760
<v Speaker 1>a couple of hours. You just want to do it,

0:06:05.800 --> 0:06:10.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, yeah, right now, you don't know. You don't

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>want to do the accent. I can't even pull it off.

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, the guy just has a very very interesting

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:19.440
<v Speaker 1>He's great, he's awesome. All right, let's get to baseball.

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:21.480
<v Speaker 1>Last night we spent we mentioned on ESPN. You had

0:06:21.480 --> 0:06:24.280
<v Speaker 1>the Red Sox and the Athletics. It was ed E.

0:06:24.839 --> 0:06:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Rodriguez against my man Floreni Montas and it was not

0:06:29.720 --> 0:06:33.760
<v Speaker 1>a pitching gem from either side. Ed Edward Rodriguez get

0:06:33.760 --> 0:06:36.279
<v Speaker 1>a lot of four runs in the second inning and

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:37.839
<v Speaker 1>that was it, got himself in a bit of a

0:06:37.839 --> 0:06:40.720
<v Speaker 1>trouble in the fifth, got pulled. He was upset by this,

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:44.560
<v Speaker 1>went nuts in them in the dugout, but he Henry

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:46.920
<v Speaker 1>got him out of it. And that was the final line,

0:06:46.920 --> 0:06:49.080
<v Speaker 1>which is four four and third, seven hits, four runs

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:52.080
<v Speaker 1>oh in the second ending two walks, seven strikeouts. The

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:54.960
<v Speaker 1>Red Sox bullpen was fantastic after that, working in and

0:06:54.960 --> 0:06:58.560
<v Speaker 1>out of trouble. Ryan Brazier pitched in the seventh after

0:06:59.080 --> 0:07:01.520
<v Speaker 1>working on him a little bit of trouble. Raiser got

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:03.920
<v Speaker 1>him right out of it, and Burnes wind up getting

0:07:03.920 --> 0:07:06.960
<v Speaker 1>to save his first since opening day. On the other side,

0:07:07.000 --> 0:07:11.280
<v Speaker 1>for Oakland's Frankie Montas, who was you know, I wasn't

0:07:11.240 --> 0:07:12.960
<v Speaker 1>just breezing through. We got to the first couple of

0:07:13.040 --> 0:07:17.560
<v Speaker 1>innings pretty easily, and then all hell broke loose in

0:07:17.640 --> 0:07:21.360
<v Speaker 1>the fourth in the third inning, where a horrific throw

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:24.600
<v Speaker 1>at Jerrickson profile followed up by a Frankie Mantas error himself,

0:07:24.800 --> 0:07:26.920
<v Speaker 1>allowed six runs to come through in the third, none

0:07:26.920 --> 0:07:29.280
<v Speaker 1>of which were earned. Came back out for the fourth,

0:07:29.320 --> 0:07:31.440
<v Speaker 1>all good, came back out for the fifth, not all good,

0:07:31.760 --> 0:07:33.560
<v Speaker 1>as he allowed another run. He went four in the third,

0:07:33.640 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 1>eight hit, seven runs, only one were earned, a two walk,

0:07:36.520 --> 0:07:38.640
<v Speaker 1>struck out four seventy five pitches. We knew as a

0:07:38.640 --> 0:07:43.920
<v Speaker 1>brutal matchup, and it was for Frankie Montas had to

0:07:43.920 --> 0:07:47.440
<v Speaker 1>see this pitching matchup. Frank, I don't understand why why

0:07:47.880 --> 0:07:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Rodriguez was so angry. I mean he was, Yeah, he

0:07:51.680 --> 0:07:53.960
<v Speaker 1>just didn't pitch well overall. I mean it's a pretty

0:07:54.040 --> 0:07:57.520
<v Speaker 1>it's a pretty tough matchup. Four left handed pitchers going

0:07:57.560 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 1>up against the AIDS line. There's a lot of really

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 1>strong right handed bads in this lineup, obviously, semi in

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Matt Chatman, Piscotti, Chris Davis, Pinder matches against lefties as well,

0:08:07.280 --> 0:08:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Ramon Loriano, even Jerks and pro far your boy Greg

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Jerkson profar was betting one sixty, got on the board

0:08:13.760 --> 0:08:16.640
<v Speaker 1>last night and had a hit in two ribbys. Uh yeah,

0:08:16.720 --> 0:08:18.480
<v Speaker 1>just overall, so it's not a good matchup for left

0:08:18.480 --> 0:08:21.000
<v Speaker 1>handed pitchers going up against the Oakland A's. So I

0:08:21.040 --> 0:08:23.520
<v Speaker 1>saw that here with e rod still did have the

0:08:23.560 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 1>seven strikeouts in four and two thirds endings page, but

0:08:25.760 --> 0:08:28.160
<v Speaker 1>overall just didn't really have it here. Reggie Mantas, Ye,

0:08:28.200 --> 0:08:30.000
<v Speaker 1>it's just terrible defense behind him. You see that by

0:08:30.000 --> 0:08:33.040
<v Speaker 1>the line um seven runs, only one of them was earned.

0:08:33.040 --> 0:08:35.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean he caused that himself. Obviously you mentioned it

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:38.160
<v Speaker 1>with the era that he had, but still gave up

0:08:38.200 --> 0:08:40.480
<v Speaker 1>eight hits only four and a third endings pitched. And

0:08:42.360 --> 0:08:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I still like Mantas a lot. It's just start geking

0:08:46.720 --> 0:08:48.640
<v Speaker 1>a little bit worried the past two stars. He's given

0:08:48.720 --> 0:08:51.600
<v Speaker 1>up a lot of hits, and that's kind of what

0:08:51.640 --> 0:08:54.880
<v Speaker 1>Floria was talking about. Doesn't miss enough bats. So I'm

0:08:54.880 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna pay close attention to Mantas. I still like him

0:08:57.240 --> 0:08:59.520
<v Speaker 1>a lot. I still think that his arsenal is really interesting.

0:08:59.760 --> 0:09:01.800
<v Speaker 1>You'll watch him pitch. He's got the mid to upper

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:04.400
<v Speaker 1>nineties fastball. He's got you know, a near ninety mile

0:09:04.480 --> 0:09:08.320
<v Speaker 1>per slider, near prower splitter that he's implementing this year.

0:09:08.360 --> 0:09:11.720
<v Speaker 1>So he has an interesting arsenal. Much just kind of

0:09:11.800 --> 0:09:14.360
<v Speaker 1>gives off that Eovaldi vibe to me a little bit

0:09:14.440 --> 0:09:17.520
<v Speaker 1>sometimes that he has the stuff but doesn't really know

0:09:17.559 --> 0:09:19.840
<v Speaker 1>how to pitch, doesn't really know how to mix miss

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:22.320
<v Speaker 1>bats all that much. Maybe it's a sequencing thing. It's

0:09:22.760 --> 0:09:24.720
<v Speaker 1>he's still learning how to pitch like on the fly

0:09:24.920 --> 0:09:28.600
<v Speaker 1>right now. So that's that's my biggest issue with Mantas.

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:31.199
<v Speaker 1>I still like him, but I want to start to

0:09:31.240 --> 0:09:33.439
<v Speaker 1>see him develop a little bit here, and then the

0:09:33.440 --> 0:09:36.480
<v Speaker 1>stuff with the Red Sox bullpen just more of the same.

0:09:36.520 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 1>It was interesting. Ryan Brazier comes in in the seventh

0:09:39.760 --> 0:09:43.920
<v Speaker 1>um with two outs, he pitches, you know, in any

0:09:43.960 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 1>in a third. At the time when he came in,

0:09:46.240 --> 0:09:48.800
<v Speaker 1>it was seven to four. So there are days where

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:50.760
<v Speaker 1>he's used in the ninth inning. There are other days

0:09:50.760 --> 0:09:53.120
<v Speaker 1>where he's kind of using a setup role, and yesterday

0:09:53.200 --> 0:09:55.079
<v Speaker 1>was one of those days where he was a set

0:09:55.160 --> 0:09:58.760
<v Speaker 1>up picture and that Barnes ultimately comes in once there

0:09:58.800 --> 0:10:01.040
<v Speaker 1>was bases loaded a ninth thing, picks up a safe

0:10:01.040 --> 0:10:03.400
<v Speaker 1>even though they were up by five runs. Greg, do

0:10:03.440 --> 0:10:05.280
<v Speaker 1>you see any rhyme or reason to the Red Sox

0:10:05.280 --> 0:10:08.360
<v Speaker 1>bullpen right now? It's kind of matchup base but they're

0:10:08.400 --> 0:10:10.839
<v Speaker 1>both right handed pitchers, so yeah, I don't think it's

0:10:10.880 --> 0:10:13.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of just like a field thing for Alex Cora

0:10:13.559 --> 0:10:16.080
<v Speaker 1>and the Red Sox. Yeah. So I was actually trying

0:10:16.120 --> 0:10:17.559
<v Speaker 1>to figure that out, and it just seemed like, for

0:10:17.640 --> 0:10:19.720
<v Speaker 1>whatever reason, they trusted Barnes more than the middle innings

0:10:19.800 --> 0:10:21.559
<v Speaker 1>Brazier more at the end. I don't know if it

0:10:21.600 --> 0:10:23.880
<v Speaker 1>was because they trusted Barnes like multiple innings or whatnot,

0:10:24.200 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 1>and they just trusted Brazier for that one that ninth inning,

0:10:26.920 --> 0:10:29.120
<v Speaker 1>and last night Brazier goes an inning in the third.

0:10:29.200 --> 0:10:33.280
<v Speaker 1>So I wish I knew they're they're both right handed.

0:10:33.320 --> 0:10:37.959
<v Speaker 1>As you said, I don't know, it's kind of it's

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:42.040
<v Speaker 1>a it's a field for some way. What are the

0:10:42.080 --> 0:10:44.480
<v Speaker 1>differences of how they could pitch, Frank, do you having

0:10:44.480 --> 0:10:47.240
<v Speaker 1>to know that bou any chance? Not? Really? Like only

0:10:47.240 --> 0:10:49.720
<v Speaker 1>from what I've seen with the Red Sox facing the Yankees,

0:10:49.800 --> 0:10:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Like when Brazier came in to face Bred Gardner, like

0:10:53.520 --> 0:10:55.960
<v Speaker 1>that was a big spot. Again, It's like there are

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:57.600
<v Speaker 1>times where he's been and it wasn't even a good

0:10:57.640 --> 0:11:00.240
<v Speaker 1>matchup because I think Gardner had, like all get a

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:02.840
<v Speaker 1>small sample size solid career numbers against him. He might

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:04.440
<v Speaker 1>have been like two for five or three for five,

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:06.520
<v Speaker 1>something like that. But Brazier comes in and gives up

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:09.400
<v Speaker 1>the grand time to Gardner earlier on in the season. Overall,

0:11:09.400 --> 0:11:11.400
<v Speaker 1>I think Matt Barnes is the better picture. He has

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:14.880
<v Speaker 1>a better ability to miss bats, He gets more swings

0:11:14.880 --> 0:11:18.199
<v Speaker 1>and misses, he gets more strikeouts. He was like better

0:11:18.320 --> 0:11:22.160
<v Speaker 1>suited for like the high levelge situations. But then last

0:11:22.280 --> 0:11:24.160
<v Speaker 1>night he comes in, I guess technically it was a

0:11:24.240 --> 0:11:26.679
<v Speaker 1>high levelge situation, right. So he comes in the ninth

0:11:26.800 --> 0:11:29.000
<v Speaker 1>ending with the Red Sox off nine to four. He

0:11:29.080 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 1>ends up picking up a save because the tying run

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:35.840
<v Speaker 1>is the next man on the day, so it's not

0:11:35.880 --> 0:11:37.800
<v Speaker 1>really a traditional save, but he did come in a

0:11:37.800 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>big spot. It's just again, there doesn't really seem to

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:44.440
<v Speaker 1>be any gem of reasons for the way things like.

0:11:45.320 --> 0:11:47.079
<v Speaker 1>I'm looking at it now. The Red Sox numbers for

0:11:47.120 --> 0:11:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the year. Ryan Brazier has been in for seven of

0:11:50.520 --> 0:11:53.680
<v Speaker 1>the Red Sox save opportunities. He has six saves. Matt

0:11:53.720 --> 0:11:56.760
<v Speaker 1>Barnes for three save opportunity, has one save. Yeah, and

0:11:57.000 --> 0:12:00.320
<v Speaker 1>so he should have two saves one opening any one

0:12:00.400 --> 0:12:02.640
<v Speaker 1>last night. Yeah, But Matt Barnes has twenty one strikeouts

0:12:02.679 --> 0:12:06.160
<v Speaker 1>in the eleven innings, pitch Sounds has twelve strikeouts. So

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:08.439
<v Speaker 1>it sounds like that to me, like Barnes is the fireman.

0:12:08.520 --> 0:12:10.360
<v Speaker 1>But why was he using that role last night? I

0:12:10.360 --> 0:12:14.120
<v Speaker 1>don't get it. Yeah, that's that's why we're talking about here,

0:12:14.160 --> 0:12:16.280
<v Speaker 1>trying to figure it out. But I think overall I

0:12:16.320 --> 0:12:18.760
<v Speaker 1>didn't realize that Brazier had this many more saves and Barnes.

0:12:18.800 --> 0:12:20.520
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was a little bit, but he does

0:12:20.600 --> 0:12:22.880
<v Speaker 1>have six of the seven Red Sox saves this here,

0:12:22.920 --> 0:12:25.800
<v Speaker 1>so so seems like it's more so in phasion in

0:12:25.920 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>favor of Braziers. Let me put it this way. Put

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:31.520
<v Speaker 1>it this way for our fantasy unders, right, if you

0:12:31.600 --> 0:12:34.960
<v Speaker 1>count holds, both of these guys are owned obviously if

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:38.200
<v Speaker 1>you're just in a standard you're twelve team home league.

0:12:38.280 --> 0:12:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Right in my league, for instance, both of them are

0:12:42.600 --> 0:12:46.080
<v Speaker 1>owned by the same guy. Both of them are owned

0:12:46.200 --> 0:12:48.360
<v Speaker 1>by the same guy. Because you're getting Iran Wim kind

0:12:48.400 --> 0:12:50.440
<v Speaker 1>of like we talked about, not necessarily Josh Hayter, but

0:12:50.480 --> 0:12:53.200
<v Speaker 1>somebody really good releaserons Ryan Pressley comes to mind, and

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:56.079
<v Speaker 1>you're getting essentially Matt Barnes in that role, and you're

0:12:56.080 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 1>getting the saves from Brazier or if they flipped them

0:12:58.360 --> 0:13:00.439
<v Speaker 1>for whatever reason, like we saw last night, he gets

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 1>to save. Anyway, would you recommend doing that or would

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:05.760
<v Speaker 1>you just own Brazier, Like what would you do in

0:13:05.800 --> 0:13:08.960
<v Speaker 1>your standard twelve team league? So if it's a twelve

0:13:08.960 --> 0:13:11.480
<v Speaker 1>team let's say rhoto or head to head categories where

0:13:11.520 --> 0:13:13.440
<v Speaker 1>you just kind of start a bunch of pictures. I

0:13:13.440 --> 0:13:16.000
<v Speaker 1>don't have a problem owning both of them. But for example,

0:13:16.080 --> 0:13:19.079
<v Speaker 1>in my head to head points league, my two home leagues,

0:13:19.120 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 1>you just start two relievers, so I'm not going to

0:13:21.480 --> 0:13:24.320
<v Speaker 1>own both of these. Maybe I'll just own Brazier because

0:13:24.320 --> 0:13:26.680
<v Speaker 1>he has six of their seven saves and he seems

0:13:26.720 --> 0:13:28.960
<v Speaker 1>more likely to get saves at this point, so I'm

0:13:29.000 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 1>more likely to own him where I just have to

0:13:30.640 --> 0:13:33.520
<v Speaker 1>start two relievers at too head points league, whatever. But

0:13:33.559 --> 0:13:36.320
<v Speaker 1>I think in your rooto leagues, where normally you just

0:13:36.320 --> 0:13:39.719
<v Speaker 1>start nine pictures it doesn't matter, you know, if they're

0:13:39.760 --> 0:13:41.760
<v Speaker 1>starters or relievers. I think there you can own all

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:42.719
<v Speaker 1>both of them. And I think in the head to

0:13:42.720 --> 0:13:45.320
<v Speaker 1>head categories league, especially in the holds league, you can

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:47.920
<v Speaker 1>own both of them. Um, so you know in two

0:13:47.920 --> 0:13:50.200
<v Speaker 1>out of the three main formats, yes you can own both.

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:52.240
<v Speaker 1>But in the head to head points league or if

0:13:52.240 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 1>you just start two relievers and that's all you have

0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:57.680
<v Speaker 1>to start, I probably wouldn't own Matt Barnes unless holds

0:13:57.679 --> 0:14:00.760
<v Speaker 1>is a category. Okay, reasonable enough, let's get into the

0:14:00.800 --> 0:14:03.360
<v Speaker 1>hitting last night. I know you hit on the Oakland

0:14:03.400 --> 0:14:05.880
<v Speaker 1>side of things. Let me with the Red Sox where

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Michael Chavis once again came through. He was two before,

0:14:08.480 --> 0:14:11.320
<v Speaker 1>he had three ribbis, solidifying he's spot in the lineup,

0:14:11.320 --> 0:14:13.160
<v Speaker 1>and now he's talked about him a lot recently. Just

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:15.079
<v Speaker 1>wanted to be clear, like, once again, he gets the

0:14:15.160 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 1>job done. Last night about this story, played first base, Greig,

0:14:18.440 --> 0:14:22.560
<v Speaker 1>which is what we kind of thought could happen Mitch

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Moreland right now. So look, they're gonna find ways to

0:14:26.440 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 1>get his bat in the lineup Greig. Also, um and

0:14:29.800 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 1>also of note, with j D. Martinez being the the

0:14:32.720 --> 0:14:35.000
<v Speaker 1>d h U suway, Lynn started at second so it

0:14:35.000 --> 0:14:37.000
<v Speaker 1>wasn't like the second base position wasn't eligible for him.

0:14:37.160 --> 0:14:39.080
<v Speaker 1>I just think they wanted to get him some reps

0:14:39.080 --> 0:14:40.680
<v Speaker 1>at first base to see where he could fit in

0:14:40.720 --> 0:14:42.480
<v Speaker 1>the line up when some of these other infielders come

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:46.680
<v Speaker 1>back from Boston. Yeah, I think it makes sense. And Um,

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:48.440
<v Speaker 1>as I've said, I think as long as as long

0:14:48.480 --> 0:14:50.560
<v Speaker 1>as he's hitting well and performing well. Look, he's got

0:14:50.560 --> 0:14:52.920
<v Speaker 1>the batting average up to two eighties six now, Um,

0:14:53.000 --> 0:14:55.240
<v Speaker 1>he gets two singles yesterday, one of them was a

0:14:55.280 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 1>bluep Three ribbies got ops over a thousand, will beat

0:14:58.720 --> 0:15:01.840
<v Speaker 1>a small sample size. Michael Javis is performing well, and

0:15:01.840 --> 0:15:03.720
<v Speaker 1>how about Mookie Betts. We were just talking about him

0:15:04.280 --> 0:15:07.160
<v Speaker 1>a couple of weeks ago. Three hits last night, the

0:15:07.160 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 1>batting average all about utter two eighty seven gread. No

0:15:10.200 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 1>concern for Mookie Betts, no concern whatsoever. He came through.

0:15:14.800 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 1>One name that when you have the Mookie Betts I

0:15:17.120 --> 0:15:20.080
<v Speaker 1>was looking up was Rafael Devers because his name we

0:15:20.080 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 1>haven't talked about at all here. So Rabhail Devers on

0:15:23.920 --> 0:15:27.080
<v Speaker 1>the year at six o BP sits at nine. That's

0:15:27.080 --> 0:15:30.440
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. What's not good is the zero home runs,

0:15:31.640 --> 0:15:34.080
<v Speaker 1>seven rivies, fifteen runs score. That's good. He has four

0:15:34.120 --> 0:15:36.400
<v Speaker 1>stolen basis in six attempts when he's running a lot.

0:15:37.400 --> 0:15:39.800
<v Speaker 1>What do you make what we've seen thus far from

0:15:39.880 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Rafael Devers really interesting name. Started looking into him because

0:15:44.680 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Florio texted me. That's exactly why I am bringing him up.

0:15:47.800 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Rafael Devers has just had like a weird start to

0:15:50.240 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the season. Um So his launch angle this year is

0:15:54.640 --> 0:15:57.240
<v Speaker 1>four point two degrees on average. Last year it was

0:15:57.360 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 1>ten point nine. So ten point nine is kind closer

0:16:00.440 --> 0:16:03.560
<v Speaker 1>to a line drive obviously four point two. I mean,

0:16:03.600 --> 0:16:05.520
<v Speaker 1>he's hitting a lot of groundballs, and you see that

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:07.400
<v Speaker 1>in the battle ball data, right now, he's got a

0:16:07.480 --> 0:16:10.960
<v Speaker 1>fifty five percent groundball rate. He's the only hitting flyballs

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty of the time. He's striking out. He's striking out

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 1>sixteen point seven percent of the time. So it seems

0:16:19.640 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 1>like he's kind of making more of a conscious ever

0:16:21.640 --> 0:16:26.760
<v Speaker 1>just to make contact and not necessarily worrying about hitting

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:28.920
<v Speaker 1>flyballs and trying to hit home runs. It seems like

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:32.600
<v Speaker 1>he's just trying to make contact right now and get

0:16:32.640 --> 0:16:34.960
<v Speaker 1>on base and maybe hit for batting average, which he's doing.

0:16:35.280 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 1>He's got a two ninety six average, but he's got

0:16:37.680 --> 0:16:40.840
<v Speaker 1>zero home runs. I mean, I mean personally, as a

0:16:40.880 --> 0:16:43.320
<v Speaker 1>fantasy owner, I would tell Dever's he sacrifice some of

0:16:43.360 --> 0:16:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the batting average. I thought, you hit two seventy two

0:16:45.640 --> 0:16:48.480
<v Speaker 1>seventy five and give me twenty five home runs. That's

0:16:48.520 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 1>what I want. It's good to see him running though, too.

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna give you some more infoone Devers on the

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 1>other side, I want to get in the bed in

0:16:54.240 --> 0:16:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Tende as well. Stick around more on the way next

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:03.880
<v Speaker 1>daily rhado dot Com learn from the game's best DPS players.

0:17:04.440 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 1>We don't just give you advice. We play every day,

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 1>all major sports, all year round. We never stop, industry

0:17:13.359 --> 0:17:17.200
<v Speaker 1>leading DPS tools and custom projections, and now the daily

0:17:17.240 --> 0:17:21.120
<v Speaker 1>rodo dot Com optimizer. In minutes, build an optimized line

0:17:21.200 --> 0:17:24.240
<v Speaker 1>up for cash games and tourneys. Learn from the game's

0:17:24.280 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 1>best DFS players. Join Daily rodo dot com. The following

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:34.760
<v Speaker 1>ad contains shocking material. Listener discretion is advised. Is someone

0:17:34.840 --> 0:17:37.880
<v Speaker 1>in your family playing a dangerous game of Russian Roulette?

0:17:38.119 --> 0:17:41.800
<v Speaker 1>Over forty three thousand people die a year from drug overdose.

0:17:42.000 --> 0:17:45.800
<v Speaker 1>A hundred and twenty people a day, five people every hour,

0:17:46.200 --> 0:17:51.480
<v Speaker 1>one person every twelve minutes. Eight thousand people die every

0:17:51.600 --> 0:17:55.080
<v Speaker 1>year from alcohol abuse. Over two hundred and forty people

0:17:55.119 --> 0:17:58.959
<v Speaker 1>a day, ten an hour, one person every six minutes.

0:17:59.480 --> 0:18:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Somebody you know, maybe next learn how to help someone

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:07.400
<v Speaker 1>you love get away from the drugs, alcohol and bad influences.

0:18:07.600 --> 0:18:09.720
<v Speaker 1>With the f m l A, people can take a

0:18:09.840 --> 0:18:12.359
<v Speaker 1>leave of absence from their job and still keep it.

0:18:12.720 --> 0:18:16.040
<v Speaker 1>Call now and learn how we can help you. Eight

0:18:16.200 --> 0:18:20.600
<v Speaker 1>six six four eight four nine six two one eight

0:18:20.760 --> 0:18:24.640
<v Speaker 1>six six four eight four nine six to one. That's

0:18:24.720 --> 0:18:29.280
<v Speaker 1>eight six six four eight four ninety six one fantasy

0:18:29.400 --> 0:18:32.359
<v Speaker 1>sports today. And you don't want wife beaters or child

0:18:32.720 --> 0:18:35.879
<v Speaker 1>people that are putting child children in harms way. You

0:18:35.880 --> 0:18:38.560
<v Speaker 1>don't want them running around the football field when people

0:18:38.680 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 1>know something may have happened. But at the same time,

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:43.480
<v Speaker 1>what do you do You have to You can suspend

0:18:43.520 --> 0:18:45.480
<v Speaker 1>them for a certain period of time, but you know,

0:18:45.560 --> 0:18:48.239
<v Speaker 1>it comes to Ruben Foster and Kareem Hunt and now

0:18:48.359 --> 0:18:51.160
<v Speaker 1>Tyreek Hill. If the if the legal system isn't gonna

0:18:51.200 --> 0:18:53.080
<v Speaker 1>do anything about it, what is the NFL supposed to do?

0:18:53.200 --> 0:18:56.159
<v Speaker 1>On Saturday's eight am Eastern on the Fantasy Sports I've

0:18:56.160 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 1>nevergen on your popular podcast providers. We do have some injuries.

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:07.359
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna get to you in a few moments when

0:19:07.440 --> 0:19:10.159
<v Speaker 1>wrap up the Diver's and been attending conversation. Uh so

0:19:10.240 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 1>we look forward to that, certainly, AJ Pollock, Anthony Rendon

0:19:13.080 --> 0:19:16.159
<v Speaker 1>h come to mind that Robinson Cano as well. But

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:18.080
<v Speaker 1>before we have the break, we're talking about Raphael Devers

0:19:18.119 --> 0:19:19.480
<v Speaker 1>and what to expect and what I wanted to bring

0:19:19.560 --> 0:19:23.920
<v Speaker 1>up Frank was in seventeen that year that he broke

0:19:23.960 --> 0:19:25.960
<v Speaker 1>out and we were super high on him going in

0:19:26.000 --> 0:19:29.719
<v Speaker 1>the last year was I was kind of looking at

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:32.399
<v Speaker 1>the batted ball profile a bit and he was a

0:19:32.440 --> 0:19:35.920
<v Speaker 1>fifty groundball guy back then, and that number, you know,

0:19:35.960 --> 0:19:38.760
<v Speaker 1>went down a little bit last year back now this year.

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:41.919
<v Speaker 1>So even though the flyball percentage was obviously higher than

0:19:41.960 --> 0:19:45.440
<v Speaker 1>it is now, he's always been a strong groundball guy.

0:19:46.160 --> 0:19:50.440
<v Speaker 1>He's hard hit rate back then same as it is now.

0:19:51.040 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't know any of any indications all of a

0:19:53.080 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 1>sudden he's just going to start lifting the ball and

0:19:55.480 --> 0:19:57.399
<v Speaker 1>get back to where we think he could be this

0:19:58.600 --> 0:20:00.879
<v Speaker 1>home run guy. I don't don't see any data that

0:20:00.920 --> 0:20:02.560
<v Speaker 1>makes this thing that's gonna happen all of a sudden.

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:04.480
<v Speaker 1>In fact, what the only thing I see is that

0:20:04.840 --> 0:20:07.200
<v Speaker 1>all right back in he's vi it was at three

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:10.119
<v Speaker 1>two this year, is at three sixty seven last year

0:20:10.200 --> 0:20:12.240
<v Speaker 1>to eighty one. I assume it's going to be somewhere

0:20:12.840 --> 0:20:16.199
<v Speaker 1>closer to three in his three sixty seven. I think

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:18.800
<v Speaker 1>these numbers across the board probably for him go down.

0:20:18.880 --> 0:20:20.960
<v Speaker 1>Outside of the on base percentage, where he seems to

0:20:21.000 --> 0:20:22.680
<v Speaker 1>have a good eye, I think the number comes down

0:20:22.680 --> 0:20:24.479
<v Speaker 1>a bit. Frank, I do like the fact that he's

0:20:24.520 --> 0:20:27.639
<v Speaker 1>walking more this year. It just seems like he's trying

0:20:27.720 --> 0:20:29.960
<v Speaker 1>to mature this season in terms of cutting down the

0:20:30.000 --> 0:20:32.600
<v Speaker 1>strikeouts of swinging strike rate is down, he's walking more so,

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:35.800
<v Speaker 1>he's got a better recognition of pitches while he's at

0:20:35.840 --> 0:20:38.320
<v Speaker 1>the plate. He's not chasing as many pitches outside the

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:41.959
<v Speaker 1>strike zone. The line drive rate is up nine percent,

0:20:42.359 --> 0:20:44.359
<v Speaker 1>so he is hitting line drives and he's hitting a

0:20:44.440 --> 0:20:47.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of groundballs, but he overall his fly ball rate

0:20:47.720 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 1>is down eighteen percent from last year. So it just

0:20:51.040 --> 0:20:53.240
<v Speaker 1>seems like he's making a conscious effort right now to

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 1>make contact and he's not trying to do too much.

0:20:56.040 --> 0:20:57.639
<v Speaker 1>But he's not trying to lift the ball. He's just

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:00.600
<v Speaker 1>kind of taking a picture giving tim. Yes, he's hitting

0:21:00.640 --> 0:21:02.800
<v Speaker 1>more line drives, he's hitting more groundballs. It seems like

0:21:02.920 --> 0:21:06.000
<v Speaker 1>he's naturally maturing as a hitter. You know what. It

0:21:06.080 --> 0:21:07.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of reminds me of a little bit Greg Chris

0:21:08.080 --> 0:21:10.640
<v Speaker 1>Bryant the past couple of years, who when he first

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 1>came into the year into the league, he started hitting

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:16.280
<v Speaker 1>a ton of flyballs, strike out a lot. Seems like

0:21:16.359 --> 0:21:20.440
<v Speaker 1>he was kind of selling out for power, and over

0:21:20.480 --> 0:21:23.120
<v Speaker 1>the past couple of seasons he cut down the strikeout rate.

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:25.560
<v Speaker 1>He's starting to hit more line drives, starting to hit

0:21:25.640 --> 0:21:28.240
<v Speaker 1>more for batting average, but the power is going down.

0:21:29.160 --> 0:21:31.399
<v Speaker 1>We'll about this a little bit yesterday regarding Chris Bryant

0:21:31.400 --> 0:21:34.200
<v Speaker 1>and that the groundball rate has been up. It reminds

0:21:34.240 --> 0:21:37.119
<v Speaker 1>me a little bit of that regarding Devor's here. But

0:21:37.960 --> 0:21:39.920
<v Speaker 1>if this continues to go the way that it's going,

0:21:40.960 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>I mean, what are we gonna get home runs out

0:21:43.520 --> 0:21:46.480
<v Speaker 1>of him? Maybe that I mean, he he could be

0:21:46.560 --> 0:21:48.600
<v Speaker 1>one of these guys who already hits his home runs

0:21:48.640 --> 0:21:51.959
<v Speaker 1>and bunches and whatever that they'll come. But I mean

0:21:52.000 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 1>there's nothing right now in the battle ball data that

0:21:54.440 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 1>that says that that's gonna happen. Like it severely says

0:21:57.920 --> 0:22:01.520
<v Speaker 1>that we underestimated his home run output for the season. Correct,

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:05.120
<v Speaker 1>we were probably expecting closer to home runs. Correct, It's

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:07.359
<v Speaker 1>not gonna happen. I mean, you look at the projections

0:22:07.400 --> 0:22:09.720
<v Speaker 1>on fan graphs from the rest of like Steamer has

0:22:09.760 --> 0:22:11.400
<v Speaker 1>n't for sixteen home runs the rest of the way.

0:22:12.560 --> 0:22:15.760
<v Speaker 1>You didn't draft Roffie Devers for sixteen home runs. Derrick

0:22:15.760 --> 0:22:19.199
<v Speaker 1>Cardi the bat projection hasn't for twenty but seventy three

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 1>batting average. So they just have to change. You know

0:22:21.000 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 1>what did I get there? Though? Yeah, It's just it's

0:22:23.840 --> 0:22:27.040
<v Speaker 1>been a really really odd starts of the year because

0:22:27.080 --> 0:22:29.880
<v Speaker 1>like there's some good again, there's pros line drive rape

0:22:29.880 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 1>being up, the wall rape being up, the strikeout rape

0:22:31.520 --> 0:22:34.680
<v Speaker 1>being down. But the cons are that kind of sacrificing

0:22:34.760 --> 0:22:36.679
<v Speaker 1>any shot at power. Here another name we a lot

0:22:36.720 --> 0:22:39.320
<v Speaker 1>of infield fly balls too. It's just Nevers is all

0:22:39.359 --> 0:22:41.120
<v Speaker 1>over the place right now. I don't I don't feel

0:22:41.119 --> 0:22:43.960
<v Speaker 1>great about him. Another name that we wanted to mention

0:22:44.040 --> 0:22:45.840
<v Speaker 1>on the red soxes Andrew Benintendi. And I wanted to

0:22:45.840 --> 0:22:47.280
<v Speaker 1>do that because there's a name that you were off

0:22:47.560 --> 0:22:49.760
<v Speaker 1>very much in draft season now that you hated him,

0:22:49.760 --> 0:22:51.719
<v Speaker 1>but you liked all the other guys going around him

0:22:51.800 --> 0:22:54.000
<v Speaker 1>a heck of a lot more. Ben Intendee on the

0:22:54.040 --> 0:22:57.119
<v Speaker 1>season two seventies six with the o b P at

0:22:57.200 --> 0:22:59.880
<v Speaker 1>three fifty four, you got two homers, thirte runs, scores,

0:22:59.880 --> 0:23:01.480
<v Speaker 1>the g RB. I has stolen a couple of bases

0:23:02.000 --> 0:23:03.960
<v Speaker 1>being caught once. When you look at the bat and

0:23:04.000 --> 0:23:06.400
<v Speaker 1>ball profile of Andrew Benintendi, what do you see, Frank,

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:10.640
<v Speaker 1>He actually is trying to hit a little bit more flyballs.

0:23:10.680 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 1>This year. He's been around, you know, thirty five to

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight percent throughout his career. Last year he was

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:18.360
<v Speaker 1>at thirty five percent. This year he's up to forty two,

0:23:18.480 --> 0:23:21.439
<v Speaker 1>so he's lifted his fly ball rate by seven percent

0:23:21.600 --> 0:23:25.239
<v Speaker 1>this season. Um, the hard hit rate is actually up,

0:23:25.359 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 1>so overall, I don't think the battaball data is bad.

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:29.720
<v Speaker 1>He's actually striking out a little bit more this year,

0:23:29.760 --> 0:23:31.760
<v Speaker 1>which has put a bit of a damper on his

0:23:32.119 --> 0:23:35.040
<v Speaker 1>batting average. To start, he's at two seventy six. He's

0:23:35.040 --> 0:23:36.960
<v Speaker 1>got two own runs, two stolen bases. That's fine. The

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:40.000
<v Speaker 1>counting stats are okay, considering the slow start that the

0:23:40.040 --> 0:23:42.840
<v Speaker 1>Red Sox lineup has gotten off to thirteen runs thirteen

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 1>r b i s. But again, look at the projections

0:23:46.040 --> 0:23:49.119
<v Speaker 1>the rest of the way Steamer fourteen home runs, thirteen

0:23:49.160 --> 0:23:52.280
<v Speaker 1>stolen basis. That would make him a sixteen homer fifteen

0:23:52.840 --> 0:23:57.320
<v Speaker 1>stolen base player for the season. That's just that's part

0:23:57.359 --> 0:23:59.520
<v Speaker 1>of the reason why I didn't want Andrew benn in Tennie,

0:23:59.520 --> 0:24:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Like I say, he's probably gonna be close to a

0:24:01.960 --> 0:24:04.760
<v Speaker 1>twenty homers twenty stolen base guy. The fact that he

0:24:04.840 --> 0:24:07.680
<v Speaker 1>was leading off for the Red Sox who expected probably

0:24:07.680 --> 0:24:10.520
<v Speaker 1>a hundred runs scored as of now, it looks like

0:24:10.600 --> 0:24:12.239
<v Speaker 1>he would fall short of that. And look, the Red

0:24:12.280 --> 0:24:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Sox lineup could get hot at that give an eye

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:17.359
<v Speaker 1>and you know he'll still probably give you eighty to

0:24:17.440 --> 0:24:20.440
<v Speaker 1>ninety runs scored. But overall, Andrew ben attend to me

0:24:20.640 --> 0:24:23.359
<v Speaker 1>was it's kind of a boring player unless you were

0:24:23.359 --> 0:24:25.359
<v Speaker 1>projecting him to do something that he hasn't done before,

0:24:25.840 --> 0:24:28.159
<v Speaker 1>Like this was gonna be his third full season in

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:31.920
<v Speaker 1>the majors. Did you expect a third year breakout. If

0:24:31.960 --> 0:24:33.600
<v Speaker 1>that was the case, then you probably took Andrew ben

0:24:33.680 --> 0:24:36.920
<v Speaker 1>Attendee at that two three turn, you know, end of

0:24:37.000 --> 0:24:39.600
<v Speaker 1>round two, early round three. He personally, you know, as

0:24:39.640 --> 0:24:43.359
<v Speaker 1>you referenced, there were just other hitters going in that range.

0:24:43.400 --> 0:24:45.879
<v Speaker 1>I would you know, I would have taken Stalling Marte

0:24:46.040 --> 0:24:48.520
<v Speaker 1>over him. If you know, Freddie Freeman, Jean carliston, any

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:50.440
<v Speaker 1>of those guys following towards the end of the second round.

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 1>You know I was taking any of those players. I

0:24:53.680 --> 0:24:56.520
<v Speaker 1>was just kind of a boring player for me. I

0:24:56.560 --> 0:24:58.720
<v Speaker 1>didn't project him to take that next step. He still

0:24:58.760 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 1>struggles against left handed pig. He has done so this year.

0:25:01.240 --> 0:25:04.199
<v Speaker 1>He's hitting around two thirty against lefties. It's always been

0:25:04.200 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>an issue for him. It seems like he sat out

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:08.160
<v Speaker 1>a few games here and there against lefties. Are ready

0:25:08.200 --> 0:25:13.080
<v Speaker 1>to start the year, not my gay? Had you been attending?

0:25:13.119 --> 0:25:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Not my gay? The Dodgers yesterday started Alex Verdugo once

0:25:18.240 --> 0:25:20.080
<v Speaker 1>again in center field. You get pitch hit for it

0:25:20.160 --> 0:25:22.280
<v Speaker 1>in the game, but Alex Verdugo started in center field.

0:25:22.280 --> 0:25:24.119
<v Speaker 1>And that's because A. J. Pollock has been placed on

0:25:24.240 --> 0:25:28.600
<v Speaker 1>the disabled list or the injured list rather and Alex Verdugo.

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:30.760
<v Speaker 1>We have kept saying, he's worth picking up if he

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:32.840
<v Speaker 1>gets a chance. What do we do with Verdugo. It's

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:35.320
<v Speaker 1>a common conversation that we have had on this show

0:25:35.680 --> 0:25:38.040
<v Speaker 1>thus far. Well over the next ten days or so,

0:25:38.240 --> 0:25:40.560
<v Speaker 1>it's the store elbow for Pollock. Verdugo is going to

0:25:40.640 --> 0:25:44.360
<v Speaker 1>get his opportunity to play every day. Verdugo last night

0:25:44.840 --> 0:25:47.439
<v Speaker 1>was batting seventh in the Dodgers line up, a Dodgers

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:50.680
<v Speaker 1>team that fell to San Francisco three to two. Alex

0:25:50.760 --> 0:25:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Verdugo in the line of every day, How interested you

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:55.600
<v Speaker 1>are you in him? Frank? Yeah, he has to be

0:25:55.640 --> 0:25:59.280
<v Speaker 1>a musclown player for now. Um and hopefully these things

0:25:59.359 --> 0:26:01.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of figured them selves that we talked about Michael

0:26:01.560 --> 0:26:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Javis and all these other young players. The cream, the

0:26:04.520 --> 0:26:08.600
<v Speaker 1>cream always rises to the top, and alec Rodugo right now, look,

0:26:08.680 --> 0:26:10.880
<v Speaker 1>he's just been he's been crushing it this year. There's

0:26:10.920 --> 0:26:12.560
<v Speaker 1>just there, There's no way around it. He is a

0:26:13.400 --> 0:26:15.399
<v Speaker 1>pure hitter. You look at his minor league numbers as

0:26:15.480 --> 0:26:17.359
<v Speaker 1>a guy that does not strike out. He's only striking

0:26:17.400 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 1>out eleven point three percent of the time this season.

0:26:19.760 --> 0:26:23.480
<v Speaker 1>He's betting three thirty three. He's got four homers, sixteen RBIs,

0:26:23.560 --> 0:26:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and limited plate appearances. He has seventy one plate appearances

0:26:27.560 --> 0:26:30.639
<v Speaker 1>on the season. Hitting the ball harder than usual. This

0:26:30.760 --> 0:26:33.520
<v Speaker 1>is a guy who has also hit too many ground

0:26:33.560 --> 0:26:36.160
<v Speaker 1>balls at times gregs so far in his brief major

0:26:36.240 --> 0:26:39.560
<v Speaker 1>league career, but upping the flyballs a little bit more

0:26:39.640 --> 0:26:42.680
<v Speaker 1>this year, hitting more line drives. And I don't worry

0:26:42.680 --> 0:26:44.520
<v Speaker 1>about splits with him. I know that this is something

0:26:45.080 --> 0:26:48.919
<v Speaker 1>like the Dodgers are super into splits. They it seems

0:26:48.920 --> 0:26:52.080
<v Speaker 1>like they always bench Max Monty against lefties, and they'll

0:26:52.119 --> 0:26:55.240
<v Speaker 1>bench Jock Peterson against lefties. But I don't think that

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Alex Verdugo is a bad hitter against leftiest smallest sample size.

0:26:59.119 --> 0:27:01.480
<v Speaker 1>He's four for eleven against lefties so far this year.

0:27:01.720 --> 0:27:03.679
<v Speaker 1>He said one of his four home runs against them,

0:27:03.920 --> 0:27:05.840
<v Speaker 1>and I looked into the minor league numbers to Greg

0:27:06.280 --> 0:27:11.000
<v Speaker 1>at Triple A last season. In nineties six at bats

0:27:11.040 --> 0:27:15.639
<v Speaker 1>against lefties, he hit three six at Triple A N

0:27:15.880 --> 0:27:20.240
<v Speaker 1>S O p s against lefties. I think the guy

0:27:20.280 --> 0:27:23.880
<v Speaker 1>can handle his own. In twenties seventeen ninety four games

0:27:23.920 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 1>against lefties, ninety four at bats against left he rather

0:27:27.080 --> 0:27:30.359
<v Speaker 1>he had to seventy seven ps. That's fine. He can

0:27:30.440 --> 0:27:33.399
<v Speaker 1>handle himself against left handed pitcher. I just, please, Dodgers,

0:27:33.440 --> 0:27:35.359
<v Speaker 1>give this guy a chance to play every single day.

0:27:35.400 --> 0:27:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I think you do have to own him in every league.

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Right now. Um, right now, Polic is dealing with an

0:27:40.359 --> 0:27:43.800
<v Speaker 1>infection in his elbow. This was the same elbow I

0:27:43.840 --> 0:27:46.280
<v Speaker 1>believe that he had surgically repaired in the past. So

0:27:46.960 --> 0:27:48.680
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't sound like it's gonna be a long stint

0:27:48.760 --> 0:27:51.159
<v Speaker 1>on the I l But if Alex Verdugo just kind

0:27:51.160 --> 0:27:54.280
<v Speaker 1>of takes off here, I think he's kind of gonna

0:27:54.320 --> 0:27:56.720
<v Speaker 1>work himself into every day playing time for the Los

0:27:56.760 --> 0:28:01.280
<v Speaker 1>Angeles Dodgers. Funny funny the fact, Greg I actually read

0:28:01.320 --> 0:28:04.879
<v Speaker 1>an article yesterday regarding Alex Verdugo and the Dodgers, and

0:28:04.880 --> 0:28:08.240
<v Speaker 1>it was basically saying that the Dodgers have a great

0:28:08.280 --> 0:28:11.040
<v Speaker 1>problem on their hands and that A J. Pak was

0:28:11.040 --> 0:28:14.040
<v Speaker 1>already starting to lose some playing time to Alex Verdugo

0:28:14.520 --> 0:28:17.639
<v Speaker 1>because he's been so awesome, so they need his bat

0:28:17.720 --> 0:28:19.040
<v Speaker 1>in the lineup. They're trying to find ways to get

0:28:19.119 --> 0:28:21.160
<v Speaker 1>him in there. He's now gonna play every single day.

0:28:21.840 --> 0:28:24.119
<v Speaker 1>I didn't I didn't love the A J. Pollock signing

0:28:24.119 --> 0:28:26.399
<v Speaker 1>when they did it. It's still kind of confuses me

0:28:26.480 --> 0:28:28.440
<v Speaker 1>now because they have this young stud ready to go

0:28:28.840 --> 0:28:31.200
<v Speaker 1>unless they plan on trading him away at some point

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:35.760
<v Speaker 1>for you know, assets to help them win. What just

0:28:36.080 --> 0:28:38.920
<v Speaker 1>very weird signing with the A J. Polly signing for

0:28:39.040 --> 0:28:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the for the Dodgers. Overall, I do think that Verdugo

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:45.040
<v Speaker 1>needs to be owning all leagues right Kensomanna started four

0:28:45.240 --> 0:28:47.440
<v Speaker 1>l A. He would have five innings, seven hits, walked too,

0:28:47.440 --> 0:28:49.040
<v Speaker 1>struck out of three for the first time this season.

0:28:49.160 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Ross stripping came out of the bullpen for l A.

0:28:51.920 --> 0:28:53.600
<v Speaker 1>It didn't go well. You only got one out and

0:28:53.640 --> 0:28:55.800
<v Speaker 1>allowed three rons on a couple of hits, the big

0:28:55.880 --> 0:28:59.760
<v Speaker 1>blow being Evan Longoria with a basis loaded double. Uh

0:28:59.800 --> 0:29:03.000
<v Speaker 1>and that was the basiness clearing. No, I really should

0:29:03.000 --> 0:29:06.000
<v Speaker 1>say against raw stripling. The big blow against him. On

0:29:06.080 --> 0:29:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the other side, Baby Shark Jeff so margin pitched well

0:29:08.720 --> 0:29:11.680
<v Speaker 1>five innings, two hits, no runs, one walk, only struck

0:29:11.760 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 1>out one, which isn't great. But facing the Dodgers, you

0:29:14.640 --> 0:29:18.880
<v Speaker 1>want five shot on anythings, I think we'll take that. Yeah. Absolutely,

0:29:18.920 --> 0:29:22.840
<v Speaker 1>If you started some margins four of this to start week, um,

0:29:22.920 --> 0:29:24.440
<v Speaker 1>I would have liked to see him go deeper into

0:29:24.520 --> 0:29:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the game. He only pitched seventy nine pitches and only

0:29:28.520 --> 0:29:30.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, through five innings, So if you were able

0:29:30.760 --> 0:29:32.400
<v Speaker 1>to get the quality star if that would have been great,

0:29:32.400 --> 0:29:34.520
<v Speaker 1>But hey, don't press your luck when it comes to

0:29:34.960 --> 0:29:37.400
<v Speaker 1>the baby Shark Jeff some margins, the fact that he

0:29:37.480 --> 0:29:39.840
<v Speaker 1>went five shutout innings. Of course you would have liked

0:29:39.880 --> 0:29:41.680
<v Speaker 1>seen more strikeouts, but it is a tough to Hodgs

0:29:41.720 --> 0:29:43.880
<v Speaker 1>line up a lineup that doesn't strip out all that much.

0:29:43.920 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 1>So overall, I think if you started him in a

0:29:45.560 --> 0:29:48.480
<v Speaker 1>two star week, you're fine with this, Greig, You're perfectly

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:50.240
<v Speaker 1>fine with it. I mean, he gave you an under

0:29:51.040 --> 0:29:53.760
<v Speaker 1>under one whip, even zero point six whip. He gave

0:29:53.800 --> 0:29:56.440
<v Speaker 1>you zero e r A. Of course you want more strikeouts,

0:29:56.480 --> 0:29:59.400
<v Speaker 1>but overall, starting for the two star week, you avoided dangerous.

0:29:59.600 --> 0:30:02.920
<v Speaker 1>You did, Yes, you did, absolutely, absolute freaking lily. It

0:30:03.040 --> 0:30:05.760
<v Speaker 1>worked out all right for you. Evan Littgoria is the

0:30:05.840 --> 0:30:07.800
<v Speaker 1>name I wanted to bring up. It was a he

0:30:07.880 --> 0:30:10.960
<v Speaker 1>pitched hit last night as Pablo Sandoval started this one

0:30:11.360 --> 0:30:14.960
<v Speaker 1>for San Francisco. Lagorio's betting just to ten with an

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:17.160
<v Speaker 1>ov P of two forty eight. He'd be owning it

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:20.600
<v Speaker 1>all in fantasy leagues right now. Only I know only okay, yeah,

0:30:20.720 --> 0:30:23.240
<v Speaker 1>he's he's just kind of washed, and he's not in

0:30:23.320 --> 0:30:26.000
<v Speaker 1>a good hitting environment that I mean, that's ultimately what

0:30:26.120 --> 0:30:28.080
<v Speaker 1>it comes down to. The skills have kind of been

0:30:28.080 --> 0:30:30.239
<v Speaker 1>dissipating the past couple of years. The walk grade has

0:30:30.280 --> 0:30:33.120
<v Speaker 1>been dropping. He had only two forty four last year,

0:30:33.160 --> 0:30:36.200
<v Speaker 1>only sixteen home runs. Just not a good ballpark to hitting,

0:30:36.240 --> 0:30:38.000
<v Speaker 1>not a good line up to hit in. He's only

0:30:38.080 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 1>hitting two ten right now. Just there's not a lot

0:30:42.920 --> 0:30:45.400
<v Speaker 1>that's gonna end up going right here for Evan long Gloria.

0:30:45.480 --> 0:30:47.200
<v Speaker 1>Like the power numbers, he's not gonna give you my much,

0:30:47.440 --> 0:30:48.960
<v Speaker 1>not gonna be able to give you counting stats in

0:30:49.000 --> 0:30:51.200
<v Speaker 1>this lineup, and now only he should be owned just

0:30:51.240 --> 0:30:53.080
<v Speaker 1>because he has a job and most of the time

0:30:53.120 --> 0:30:55.960
<v Speaker 1>he's gonna play, But anything other than that, like even

0:30:56.000 --> 0:30:58.560
<v Speaker 1>in a fifteen team mix Rhodo Greg, I wouldn't want

0:30:58.640 --> 0:31:00.520
<v Speaker 1>him as my corner infielder. He just dropped in the

0:31:00.560 --> 0:31:03.600
<v Speaker 1>main event, So that kind of tells you how you

0:31:03.600 --> 0:31:06.720
<v Speaker 1>should feel about him. Only only only place worth oning him.

0:31:07.440 --> 0:31:10.000
<v Speaker 1>Zach Wheeler started for the Mets last night and just

0:31:10.040 --> 0:31:12.960
<v Speaker 1>didn't have his best stuff. He allowed six four runs

0:31:13.000 --> 0:31:15.080
<v Speaker 1>over his six innings, he walked three, struck out four

0:31:15.360 --> 0:31:17.880
<v Speaker 1>seven hits. I will say this, he got better as

0:31:18.000 --> 0:31:21.360
<v Speaker 1>he went on. Um Again, it wasn't a great outing

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:25.120
<v Speaker 1>by Zach Wheeler. Um. He allowed those runs all in

0:31:25.200 --> 0:31:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the second inning, but I thought he was actually getting

0:31:29.080 --> 0:31:31.040
<v Speaker 1>better as he had a feel for what was working

0:31:31.120 --> 0:31:32.760
<v Speaker 1>and what wasn't. Frank, I watched a lot of this

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:35.280
<v Speaker 1>start on the other side of Tanna row Ark. Tanna

0:31:35.360 --> 0:31:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Roark line of three innings and two thirds, four hits,

0:31:37.160 --> 0:31:39.760
<v Speaker 1>four runs, four walks and three You started him in

0:31:39.760 --> 0:31:42.280
<v Speaker 1>a two star a week. You don't feel great if

0:31:42.280 --> 0:31:43.959
<v Speaker 1>you would have got that, Jeff Somerg just start out

0:31:44.000 --> 0:31:45.520
<v Speaker 1>of Tanna row or you would have been all right

0:31:45.560 --> 0:31:47.760
<v Speaker 1>with that. I know it was the second ending that

0:31:47.840 --> 0:31:49.920
<v Speaker 1>really doomed Zach Wheeler yesterday. But he was in the

0:31:50.080 --> 0:31:52.120
<v Speaker 1>base runners on our all night, to be fair, but

0:31:52.400 --> 0:31:56.680
<v Speaker 1>he pitched a lot better after that second inning. Okay, yeah,

0:31:56.720 --> 0:31:58.760
<v Speaker 1>So he he walks Pueaked to lead off the end

0:31:58.760 --> 0:32:01.440
<v Speaker 1>of he walks Schebler, then gives but Double a single.

0:32:01.920 --> 0:32:03.760
<v Speaker 1>And I didn't catch this because I was actually on

0:32:03.840 --> 0:32:06.120
<v Speaker 1>my way to go play basketball, Craig. But Florio was

0:32:06.200 --> 0:32:07.960
<v Speaker 1>saying that he was getting hit with a lot of

0:32:08.160 --> 0:32:11.160
<v Speaker 1>dink and dump, kind of like really soft like bass hits,

0:32:11.240 --> 0:32:13.680
<v Speaker 1>doubles that were just finding the right spots of following.

0:32:13.840 --> 0:32:15.760
<v Speaker 1>That's part of the game. Obviously he was, but the

0:32:15.800 --> 0:32:20.000
<v Speaker 1>concern was the velocity was down. After averaging around in

0:32:20.120 --> 0:32:22.720
<v Speaker 1>his last start, he was back around ninety five for

0:32:22.800 --> 0:32:26.400
<v Speaker 1>an average, I believe last night, and it was freezing

0:32:26.480 --> 0:32:28.760
<v Speaker 1>in City Field. I don't know if that is what's

0:32:28.760 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 1>going on there, but it was worth noting. I read

0:32:31.600 --> 0:32:35.120
<v Speaker 1>that he threw a pitch that was like on the gun,

0:32:35.440 --> 0:32:37.320
<v Speaker 1>and Mickey Calloway came out to talk to him. He's like,

0:32:37.320 --> 0:32:39.520
<v Speaker 1>are you all right right, because you know you're not

0:32:40.200 --> 0:32:42.840
<v Speaker 1>used to seeing that. If you see a straight fastball

0:32:42.960 --> 0:32:45.000
<v Speaker 1>ninety one miles problem from Zach wheel You're like, Okay,

0:32:45.520 --> 0:32:47.200
<v Speaker 1>what the heck is going on? This guy is normally

0:32:49.080 --> 0:32:52.960
<v Speaker 1>per hour, sometimes touching a hundred. But you you're absolutely

0:32:53.040 --> 0:32:56.239
<v Speaker 1>right about the the velocity being down. He had been,

0:32:56.320 --> 0:32:59.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, on average, and then yesterday he was around.

0:33:00.160 --> 0:33:02.920
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna pay attention to Zach Wheeler or for here.

0:33:02.920 --> 0:33:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully he's not dealing with anything a guy who's kind

0:33:05.280 --> 0:33:07.000
<v Speaker 1>of always been nicked up in his career with a

0:33:07.040 --> 0:33:09.920
<v Speaker 1>lot of injuries. So we're keeping a close signs. Zach

0:33:09.920 --> 0:33:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Wheeler just was not a great start, but honestly, it

0:33:12.600 --> 0:33:13.880
<v Speaker 1>could have been a lot worse the way of that

0:33:13.920 --> 0:33:18.760
<v Speaker 1>second anyone. Absolutely again, he got better as things went on.

0:33:19.200 --> 0:33:21.600
<v Speaker 1>The reason I also bring up this game is well,

0:33:22.000 --> 0:33:24.840
<v Speaker 1>it's twofold first man Jesse Winker. It is eighth home

0:33:24.920 --> 0:33:27.320
<v Speaker 1>run of the season. Whenever I look at Jessie Winkers

0:33:27.360 --> 0:33:29.880
<v Speaker 1>game log, I'm shocked it's not Homer every day. It's

0:33:29.880 --> 0:33:34.120
<v Speaker 1>not just feels that way, um, but Winker, he's finally

0:33:34.240 --> 0:33:36.880
<v Speaker 1>getting hit the ball better. He's much more comfortable in

0:33:36.880 --> 0:33:38.400
<v Speaker 1>the cleanup spot. I know this is not a lot,

0:33:38.560 --> 0:33:40.600
<v Speaker 1>but the average now back up to forty. Like if

0:33:40.600 --> 0:33:43.720
<v Speaker 1>he just continues seeing the ball better and getting better contact.

0:33:43.840 --> 0:33:46.120
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be back when you want it, really, OK's

0:33:46.120 --> 0:33:50.200
<v Speaker 1>not over three. Things are going better for Jesse Winker obviously.

0:33:50.560 --> 0:33:52.640
<v Speaker 1>Is Who would you rather own? Jesse Winker Alex Verduga.

0:33:54.680 --> 0:33:57.880
<v Speaker 1>I will take Jesse Winker just because I think his

0:33:58.000 --> 0:34:00.720
<v Speaker 1>playing time is more solidified for the rest of the season.

0:34:02.120 --> 0:34:04.160
<v Speaker 1>If I knew that they were both going to have

0:34:04.240 --> 0:34:06.960
<v Speaker 1>a starting opportunity every day from here on out, I

0:34:07.000 --> 0:34:10.040
<v Speaker 1>would probably take for Dougo just because the lineup is

0:34:10.040 --> 0:34:12.120
<v Speaker 1>a little bit better with the Dodgers, parks a little

0:34:12.120 --> 0:34:15.319
<v Speaker 1>bit better for Cincinnati. It is true we'rest putting hairs

0:34:15.400 --> 0:34:17.319
<v Speaker 1>here for sure, because I do like both guys a lot,

0:34:17.440 --> 0:34:19.600
<v Speaker 1>But in a vacuum right now, I would take Winkers

0:34:19.600 --> 0:34:20.960
<v Speaker 1>just because I think the playing time the rest of

0:34:21.000 --> 0:34:23.680
<v Speaker 1>the way is a little bit more solidified. Hit his

0:34:23.760 --> 0:34:26.080
<v Speaker 1>eighth home run last night, Greig, already your career high.

0:34:26.239 --> 0:34:29.040
<v Speaker 1>How about that for Jesse Winker. You mentioned the playing

0:34:29.120 --> 0:34:32.360
<v Speaker 1>time being solidified. Well, that's interesting because it looks like

0:34:32.400 --> 0:34:35.120
<v Speaker 1>the Reds potentially as soon as this weekend, may have

0:34:35.120 --> 0:34:39.400
<v Speaker 1>another outfielder brought up. As it seems as if lads

0:34:39.480 --> 0:34:42.600
<v Speaker 1>up it's now time for Nick Senzel. Senz he'll return

0:34:42.680 --> 0:34:45.920
<v Speaker 1>to the minors after his ankle injury from the spring

0:34:46.239 --> 0:34:48.600
<v Speaker 1>about eight games ago. Things are going well in his

0:34:48.640 --> 0:34:51.719
<v Speaker 1>first home run of the season last night, and Senzel

0:34:51.840 --> 0:34:54.719
<v Speaker 1>evidently has taken to center field very very nicely for

0:34:55.000 --> 0:34:57.840
<v Speaker 1>Cincinnati and been playing Scottie Cheveler in center field for

0:34:57.880 --> 0:35:01.160
<v Speaker 1>most of this season. Chevler's batting one thirty five two

0:35:01.239 --> 0:35:03.520
<v Speaker 1>seventy three b V certainly doing nothing to hold down

0:35:03.520 --> 0:35:06.680
<v Speaker 1>the job. Yashl Twig has been bad and Matt Camp

0:35:06.960 --> 0:35:10.200
<v Speaker 1>is herb. The only outfielder performing. It's winker and Nick

0:35:10.239 --> 0:35:12.879
<v Speaker 1>Senzel gets called up. He's going to play every day

0:35:13.200 --> 0:35:15.120
<v Speaker 1>and we could be just a few days away from

0:35:15.160 --> 0:35:18.719
<v Speaker 1>Senzel time. Absolutely, Greg and Nick senzeill owning forty three

0:35:18.800 --> 0:35:21.360
<v Speaker 1>percent of YAHOO league's right now, So you might be

0:35:21.400 --> 0:35:22.799
<v Speaker 1>out there in your league, if you're playing a ten

0:35:22.880 --> 0:35:24.880
<v Speaker 1>team league, maybe a shallower a twelve team league, just

0:35:24.960 --> 0:35:26.560
<v Speaker 1>go out and check and make sure that Nick Senzel

0:35:26.640 --> 0:35:28.560
<v Speaker 1>is owned, and if not, make sure to get him

0:35:28.600 --> 0:35:32.000
<v Speaker 1>on your team. UH. The hit tool is absolutely legit, Greg.

0:35:32.160 --> 0:35:36.040
<v Speaker 1>That was really the UH calling card for Nick Senzel

0:35:36.120 --> 0:35:37.719
<v Speaker 1>the past couple of years he's dealt with a lot

0:35:37.760 --> 0:35:41.040
<v Speaker 1>of injuries, but his hit tool is his number one tool.

0:35:41.239 --> 0:35:44.160
<v Speaker 1>But he does have an interesting power speaking combination as well.

0:35:44.719 --> 0:35:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Just a few seasons ago in twenty seventeen, he had

0:35:47.160 --> 0:35:50.080
<v Speaker 1>fourteen home runs with fourteen stolen basis and bad three

0:35:50.200 --> 0:35:52.560
<v Speaker 1>twenty one with a nine oh five o ps. So

0:35:52.880 --> 0:35:55.239
<v Speaker 1>there is a lot to like about Senzel here and

0:35:55.360 --> 0:35:58.480
<v Speaker 1>just joining this lineup overall, Uh, they get another shot

0:35:58.520 --> 0:36:00.400
<v Speaker 1>in the arm. Yesterday I mentioned a they lead off

0:36:00.480 --> 0:36:03.319
<v Speaker 1>Jose Perazzo with ends up working out well. He goes

0:36:03.360 --> 0:36:06.360
<v Speaker 1>to for five hits and RBI double, So maybe this

0:36:06.520 --> 0:36:10.560
<v Speaker 1>is a sign of things to come um with they

0:36:10.600 --> 0:36:12.440
<v Speaker 1>can they can use him at the top of the order.

0:36:12.520 --> 0:36:15.560
<v Speaker 1>They can use Ums at the top of the lineup,

0:36:15.600 --> 0:36:18.120
<v Speaker 1>and and in Votto second, and then they still have

0:36:18.360 --> 0:36:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Suarez and they still have Jesse Winker and the Senzel's

0:36:22.239 --> 0:36:24.160
<v Speaker 1>coming to So this line is gonna get better. It's

0:36:24.200 --> 0:36:26.399
<v Speaker 1>a good ballpark to hit in. Once the weather starts

0:36:26.440 --> 0:36:27.840
<v Speaker 1>to heat up a little bit, I think this Red's

0:36:27.840 --> 0:36:30.680
<v Speaker 1>lineup will do so um with the weather as well.

0:36:30.800 --> 0:36:33.080
<v Speaker 1>So looking forward to Senzel joining there, just make sure

0:36:33.080 --> 0:36:35.879
<v Speaker 1>he's owning new lead when we come back. I want

0:36:35.880 --> 0:36:37.600
<v Speaker 1>to ask Frank about a Mets player, kind of like

0:36:37.680 --> 0:36:39.960
<v Speaker 1>we did with Ben and Tendie Endeavors, and that's Michael

0:36:39.960 --> 0:36:41.520
<v Speaker 1>cold Aford all because we haven't talked all that much

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:43.719
<v Speaker 1>about Conford, so we're talking about him. We'll also mentioned

0:36:43.800 --> 0:36:46.680
<v Speaker 1>Jake Oderesi and what he did against Houston and it's

0:36:46.680 --> 0:36:49.560
<v Speaker 1>a sign of things to come. Stick around. More baseball

0:36:49.680 --> 0:36:59.680
<v Speaker 1>chatter on the way. Right after this, the Fantasy Sports

0:36:59.719 --> 0:37:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Network gets ready to take you out to the ball game.

0:37:02.200 --> 0:37:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Our experts and analysts are following the Boys of Summer

0:37:04.680 --> 0:37:06.960
<v Speaker 1>through all one d and sixty two games of the

0:37:07.000 --> 0:37:10.240
<v Speaker 1>two thousand nineteen MLB season with the best fantasy baseball

0:37:10.239 --> 0:37:12.879
<v Speaker 1>analysis in the industry. Catch the latest news and notes

0:37:12.920 --> 0:37:14.920
<v Speaker 1>every day to help you win your fantasy leagues and

0:37:15.239 --> 0:37:18.360
<v Speaker 1>Georgia Best Tournaments. Will always want you back listening and

0:37:18.400 --> 0:37:20.840
<v Speaker 1>watching the Fantasy Sports Network on the fvnt s Y

0:37:20.960 --> 0:37:23.279
<v Speaker 1>Radio app and the f f t s Y YouTube channel.

0:37:23.360 --> 0:37:26.360
<v Speaker 1>The Fantasy Sports Network where we're root root rooting for

0:37:26.520 --> 0:37:31.280
<v Speaker 1>your fantasy baseball team. Morie Salad two thousand and fifteen,

0:37:31.360 --> 0:37:34.600
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and sixteen European Long Drive Tour Champion, two

0:37:34.680 --> 0:37:42.560
<v Speaker 1>thousand seventeen, World Number one me personally, I keep my

0:37:42.680 --> 0:37:48.239
<v Speaker 1>game face on me all the time, especially coming out

0:37:48.239 --> 0:37:52.080
<v Speaker 1>of the bunker, leaving the range or even leaving the poorts.

0:37:53.719 --> 0:37:56.279
<v Speaker 1>What's your story? Go to Game Based Grooming dot Com

0:37:56.360 --> 0:37:58.920
<v Speaker 1>from all your athletic facial wipes and body cleansing needs

0:37:59.600 --> 0:38:04.120
<v Speaker 1>in this league for Avengers instead. And then they're battling

0:38:04.160 --> 0:38:11.320
<v Speaker 1>Mickey Mouse. He welcome everybody. It's some critics, little world.

0:38:11.840 --> 0:38:14.560
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna get rid of all the evil. Yeah no,

0:38:14.840 --> 0:38:17.600
<v Speaker 1>Mr Bill, Mickey Mouse, Yeah, I kind of do do

0:38:17.680 --> 0:38:23.560
<v Speaker 1>a Mr Bill? No, Hey, what do I mis? Mr

0:38:23.680 --> 0:38:26.280
<v Speaker 1>Bell Saturday, He's two pm E Stern on the Fantasy

0:38:26.320 --> 0:38:29.719
<v Speaker 1>sports networking on your popular podcast providers can't get enough

0:38:29.760 --> 0:38:33.399
<v Speaker 1>fantasy football. Rhodo Experts has launched their NFL three five

0:38:33.440 --> 0:38:36.720
<v Speaker 1>Fantasy Football package, which includes the best math based seasonal

0:38:36.760 --> 0:38:40.240
<v Speaker 1>projections and rankings available anywhere on the Internet. Davis Madig

0:38:40.280 --> 0:38:43.240
<v Speaker 1>and the Rhoto Experts are providing dynasty, season long betting,

0:38:43.360 --> 0:38:45.920
<v Speaker 1>best ball and NFL Drip content every day of the

0:38:46.000 --> 0:38:48.120
<v Speaker 1>year to give you an edge regardless of what type

0:38:48.120 --> 0:38:50.879
<v Speaker 1>of fantasy football you play. Say Temper sent at roto

0:38:50.960 --> 0:38:52.920
<v Speaker 1>experts dot com with the promo code V and t

0:38:53.120 --> 0:38:56.160
<v Speaker 1>s Y. It's the NFL three six five Fantasy Football

0:38:56.160 --> 0:39:11.040
<v Speaker 1>package only at Rhoto Experts dot Com, Fantasy Best Friends

0:39:11.080 --> 0:39:16.279
<v Speaker 1>Forever Fantasy Sports Radio Network. You can catch Make It

0:39:16.360 --> 0:39:18.960
<v Speaker 1>Rain with Joan Earian Day Martinez weekday mornings from six

0:39:19.000 --> 0:39:20.839
<v Speaker 1>to nine am Eastern right here on the Fantasy Sports

0:39:21.000 --> 0:39:22.759
<v Speaker 1>radio networks. They get you caught up on all the

0:39:22.800 --> 0:39:26.280
<v Speaker 1>previous night's action and prepped for the sports wagering day ahead.

0:39:26.480 --> 0:39:29.200
<v Speaker 1>You can also watch the broadcast on YouTube and participate

0:39:29.200 --> 0:39:31.680
<v Speaker 1>in their chat ring watching on Periscope, Twitch, What Counts,

0:39:31.840 --> 0:39:34.479
<v Speaker 1>other OTT platforms. Become part of the show and tune

0:39:34.480 --> 0:39:37.040
<v Speaker 1>in entertainment. The knowledge of the extra money'll put in

0:39:37.040 --> 0:39:39.320
<v Speaker 1>your pockets. To Make It Rain with Joe Dane weekday

0:39:39.320 --> 0:39:43.160
<v Speaker 1>mornings from six nine Eastern only on f N T

0:39:43.960 --> 0:39:45.880
<v Speaker 1>s Y. I said before the break, I want to

0:39:45.920 --> 0:39:48.440
<v Speaker 1>discuss maybe a good Ford just another meaning that very

0:39:48.480 --> 0:39:50.640
<v Speaker 1>popular in draft days, but we haven't really spoken all

0:39:50.680 --> 0:39:52.160
<v Speaker 1>that much about him. What can you tell us from

0:39:52.200 --> 0:39:56.040
<v Speaker 1>his batted batted ball profile? Another guy who's buying into

0:39:56.040 --> 0:39:59.920
<v Speaker 1>the launch angle revolutions so far this year fly by

0:40:00.000 --> 0:40:02.200
<v Speaker 1>all rate, that would be a career high for him.

0:40:02.760 --> 0:40:05.439
<v Speaker 1>UH as of now, last season, he was right around

0:40:05.480 --> 0:40:09.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty six point six percent UM. The hard hit. The

0:40:09.320 --> 0:40:13.240
<v Speaker 1>hard hit rate is not great, it's right around league

0:40:13.239 --> 0:40:15.960
<v Speaker 1>average thirty five percent. But the fact that he's putting

0:40:15.960 --> 0:40:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the ball in the air more, striking out less, walking

0:40:18.760 --> 0:40:21.799
<v Speaker 1>a ton seventeen point six percent walk. Right, if you've

0:40:21.840 --> 0:40:23.560
<v Speaker 1>got this guy in O b P or points lee,

0:40:23.680 --> 0:40:25.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you feel great about it. Right now, he's

0:40:25.840 --> 0:40:29.160
<v Speaker 1>got a nine's got twenty runs scored because the Mets

0:40:29.239 --> 0:40:31.000
<v Speaker 1>lineup is a solid one, and the fact that he

0:40:31.160 --> 0:40:32.880
<v Speaker 1>bats towards the top of it and he's walking as

0:40:32.960 --> 0:40:35.040
<v Speaker 1>much as he is, and he's got six home runs.

0:40:35.200 --> 0:40:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Chipping in some stolen bases now to not really a

0:40:37.440 --> 0:40:40.640
<v Speaker 1>part of his game that we were expecting. He's already

0:40:40.640 --> 0:40:43.560
<v Speaker 1>got two stolen bases. I think Michael Conforto has done

0:40:44.200 --> 0:40:46.840
<v Speaker 1>everything asked to him so far, right to seventies, six hommers,

0:40:46.880 --> 0:40:50.319
<v Speaker 1>thirteen ribbies, twenty runs scored, UM, striking out less, hitting

0:40:50.320 --> 0:40:53.279
<v Speaker 1>more flyballs. There's lots of like working. Yes, there is

0:40:54.040 --> 0:40:56.640
<v Speaker 1>actually doing what you would hope he would when you

0:40:56.840 --> 0:41:00.360
<v Speaker 1>selected him on Draft Dead. I mentioned Minnesota and Houston

0:41:00.480 --> 0:41:04.560
<v Speaker 1>last night. It was a pitching battle between Justin Berlinder

0:41:04.640 --> 0:41:07.239
<v Speaker 1>went six innings, two hits, one run. The only run

0:41:07.280 --> 0:41:10.680
<v Speaker 1>aloud was an Age Nanza solo shot in the thirties.

0:41:10.719 --> 0:41:13.160
<v Speaker 1>First hommer of this season, I struck out seven while

0:41:13.200 --> 0:41:17.640
<v Speaker 1>walking to well. Jake Odorici seven innings, four hits, one walks,

0:41:17.719 --> 0:41:21.840
<v Speaker 1>seven strikeouts against that Astros lineup, Frank ODORESI. If you

0:41:21.880 --> 0:41:24.399
<v Speaker 1>look at what he has done thus far this year,

0:41:25.000 --> 0:41:28.160
<v Speaker 1>pretty good. Only one only one outing where he couldn't

0:41:28.160 --> 0:41:30.320
<v Speaker 1>get through the first thing. Other than that, not on

0:41:30.520 --> 0:41:33.200
<v Speaker 1>Stephen Matt's like, he's been really good. What can you

0:41:33.239 --> 0:41:36.160
<v Speaker 1>tell us about Jake LODORIZI They don't really trust it

0:41:36.280 --> 0:41:38.560
<v Speaker 1>all that much. I will say this, The swinging strikes

0:41:38.560 --> 0:41:40.520
<v Speaker 1>are up. The k per nine is up this year

0:41:40.560 --> 0:41:43.439
<v Speaker 1>as well, which helps because there's a guy who normally

0:41:43.480 --> 0:41:45.200
<v Speaker 1>when he gives up contact, he gives up a lot

0:41:45.239 --> 0:41:48.439
<v Speaker 1>of flyballs. He just has a twenty three percent groundball rates.

0:41:48.480 --> 0:41:51.080
<v Speaker 1>So that's why you see is he raised three point

0:41:51.120 --> 0:41:53.440
<v Speaker 1>three four but his x FIT is four point seven

0:41:53.600 --> 0:41:56.080
<v Speaker 1>one because if you normalize his home run the fly

0:41:56.160 --> 0:41:58.840
<v Speaker 1>ball ratio to league average, which is around ten eleven,

0:41:59.640 --> 0:42:03.200
<v Speaker 1>and this is basically his he's adjusted e r A

0:42:03.400 --> 0:42:05.759
<v Speaker 1>based on a normalized home run the flyball ratio. So

0:42:05.840 --> 0:42:08.359
<v Speaker 1>a guy who gives up this many flyballs but hasn't

0:42:08.400 --> 0:42:10.239
<v Speaker 1>given up this many home runs to start the year.

0:42:10.680 --> 0:42:12.520
<v Speaker 1>He's been a little bit lucky. I like the fact

0:42:12.520 --> 0:42:14.319
<v Speaker 1>that he's getting more swings and misses and getting more

0:42:14.360 --> 0:42:17.880
<v Speaker 1>strikeouts Greg, But overall, he's just not a guy that

0:42:18.000 --> 0:42:19.839
<v Speaker 1>I trust. You know, he goes out here and has

0:42:19.880 --> 0:42:22.719
<v Speaker 1>a great performance against the Houston Astros. He's the type

0:42:22.760 --> 0:42:24.080
<v Speaker 1>of picture that you put him in your line up

0:42:24.120 --> 0:42:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the next time out, and he's going up against the

0:42:25.960 --> 0:42:29.520
<v Speaker 1>Cleveland Indians, the Detroit Tigers, ibout the New York Yankees.

0:42:30.920 --> 0:42:33.279
<v Speaker 1>It's that starts in Yankee Stadium too, Like doesn't that

0:42:33.360 --> 0:42:35.640
<v Speaker 1>just scream Like that's a game where like the home

0:42:35.719 --> 0:42:38.960
<v Speaker 1>run to flyball ratio regression kind of comes into play

0:42:39.000 --> 0:42:42.759
<v Speaker 1>there because it is in Yankee Stadium. Look, if you

0:42:42.840 --> 0:42:44.239
<v Speaker 1>if you start him for a two star with you

0:42:44.280 --> 0:42:47.920
<v Speaker 1>obviously against the Astros, And yeah, we asked Modi yesterday.

0:42:47.920 --> 0:42:49.759
<v Speaker 1>He said no, there's no way, and I agreed with him,

0:42:49.840 --> 0:42:51.759
<v Speaker 1>Like he was available in my league. I didn't pick

0:42:51.800 --> 0:42:53.560
<v Speaker 1>him up. I didn't start him anywhere. If you started

0:42:53.640 --> 0:42:55.000
<v Speaker 1>him yesterday for a two star a week and you

0:42:55.080 --> 0:42:57.160
<v Speaker 1>got that start out of him, you feel from phenomenal.

0:42:57.280 --> 0:42:59.440
<v Speaker 1>You'll basically take whatever you get out of him, and

0:42:59.560 --> 0:43:01.839
<v Speaker 1>Yankees at him in his second start later this week. Greg.

0:43:02.000 --> 0:43:05.480
<v Speaker 1>But overall, if I just play in a head to

0:43:05.600 --> 0:43:08.040
<v Speaker 1>head daily league where I can pick him up and

0:43:08.120 --> 0:43:09.880
<v Speaker 1>scream him, I would He was not be one of

0:43:09.960 --> 0:43:13.919
<v Speaker 1>my active targets going up against Yankees. All right, So JAGODORESI,

0:43:13.920 --> 0:43:19.080
<v Speaker 1>Frankstanville not buying it at this moment. St. Louis and Washington.

0:43:19.440 --> 0:43:22.360
<v Speaker 1>Last night you had Michael Waka come off the d

0:43:22.520 --> 0:43:24.759
<v Speaker 1>L to face off against Patrick Corban and I bring

0:43:24.840 --> 0:43:27.120
<v Speaker 1>this game up now. Uh talk about Corban, who he

0:43:27.200 --> 0:43:30.120
<v Speaker 1>brought up a couple days ago where you're saying, maybe

0:43:30.160 --> 0:43:32.640
<v Speaker 1>I deserved the L on that he went at five innings,

0:43:32.640 --> 0:43:35.520
<v Speaker 1>allowed six hits, six runs, he walked four, he struck

0:43:35.600 --> 0:43:38.680
<v Speaker 1>out five. The fifth inning was where all the damage

0:43:38.680 --> 0:43:41.759
<v Speaker 1>having for Corban, who was just cruising right along. He

0:43:41.840 --> 0:43:44.400
<v Speaker 1>did not have it in that fifth inning. Yeah, the

0:43:44.480 --> 0:43:46.759
<v Speaker 1>walks are really uncanny for him. I think that's kind

0:43:46.760 --> 0:43:48.840
<v Speaker 1>of what did him in here, gives up a solo

0:43:48.920 --> 0:43:50.839
<v Speaker 1>home run to Harrison Bader. I mean, it's a really

0:43:50.960 --> 0:43:54.080
<v Speaker 1>tough St. Louis Cardinals lineup, and kind of similar to

0:43:54.160 --> 0:43:56.120
<v Speaker 1>what I said about Irod going up against the Oakland

0:43:56.120 --> 0:43:58.680
<v Speaker 1>A's earlier on. This is a really tough lineup for

0:43:58.840 --> 0:44:01.839
<v Speaker 1>left handed cheers because you have gold Schmid, who's a righty.

0:44:02.000 --> 0:44:04.200
<v Speaker 1>You got de Young who's a right you got alrighty,

0:44:04.320 --> 0:44:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Jose Martinez who by the way, Greg, good call with

0:44:07.040 --> 0:44:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Martinez continuing to get it done too for four yesterday

0:44:09.480 --> 0:44:12.680
<v Speaker 1>with another RBI Yadier Molina is a righty. They take

0:44:12.719 --> 0:44:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Colton walk out of the lineup, they put in Jajerko,

0:44:15.200 --> 0:44:16.880
<v Speaker 1>who's a right They have Harrison Bader. So this is

0:44:16.920 --> 0:44:19.880
<v Speaker 1>a really really tough lineup for left handed pitchers to

0:44:20.000 --> 0:44:22.840
<v Speaker 1>navigate here. And I think, you know, once he starts

0:44:22.920 --> 0:44:26.359
<v Speaker 1>walking four guys, Greg and a start, I mean, that's

0:44:26.640 --> 0:44:30.359
<v Speaker 1>that's basically what's gonna do Patchri Corbin And I believe

0:44:30.400 --> 0:44:32.000
<v Speaker 1>he also walked in a run at some point he

0:44:32.040 --> 0:44:34.759
<v Speaker 1>had based on it and walked someone in UM. But

0:44:34.840 --> 0:44:36.600
<v Speaker 1>this is a guy who last year he was two

0:44:36.640 --> 0:44:39.040
<v Speaker 1>point one six walks per nine. This year he's two

0:44:39.120 --> 0:44:42.840
<v Speaker 1>point three nine walks per nine, so normally has pretty

0:44:42.920 --> 0:44:45.640
<v Speaker 1>good command, doesn't walk all that many so to see

0:44:45.719 --> 0:44:47.800
<v Speaker 1>him walk four guys. I think last night was just

0:44:47.840 --> 0:44:49.640
<v Speaker 1>one of those nights where he just didn't have it

0:44:49.760 --> 0:44:51.680
<v Speaker 1>against a really strong Cardinals line up. Like a walk

0:44:51.680 --> 0:44:53.800
<v Speaker 1>A walk three guys and his five innings work he

0:44:53.840 --> 0:44:56.160
<v Speaker 1>lot of four hits, three runs, he struck out five.

0:44:56.880 --> 0:44:58.520
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Higgs did come on in the ninth inning and

0:44:58.600 --> 0:45:01.359
<v Speaker 1>take off. I'm is not a walk done, man, I'm

0:45:01.440 --> 0:45:04.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm long passed a guy. He walks too many guys

0:45:04.080 --> 0:45:08.720
<v Speaker 1>he normally doesn't get that many strikeouts. Is just nope, pass.

0:45:09.400 --> 0:45:12.640
<v Speaker 1>I do want to note in this one Carter here

0:45:12.680 --> 0:45:15.200
<v Speaker 1>Boom he went over three head his first ever, which

0:45:15.239 --> 0:45:20.120
<v Speaker 1>isn't good. That had sixth in the lineup defense. Yes,

0:45:20.200 --> 0:45:24.319
<v Speaker 1>there are one reason he may not last. Just I'm

0:45:24.320 --> 0:45:27.279
<v Speaker 1>just putting out there. It's truth. Here Key Boom, that

0:45:27.440 --> 0:45:31.200
<v Speaker 1>had sixth in the lineup yesterday, ahead of Brian Doser,

0:45:31.280 --> 0:45:34.560
<v Speaker 1>ahead of Young and a head of Patrick Corman. Yeah,

0:45:34.600 --> 0:45:37.239
<v Speaker 1>so you'd like to see that. Obviously, the over here

0:45:37.680 --> 0:45:39.879
<v Speaker 1>feel really really small sample size. Hit two home runs

0:45:39.920 --> 0:45:42.160
<v Speaker 1>over the weekend in this game, and without Anthony Rendon,

0:45:42.320 --> 0:45:44.279
<v Speaker 1>who remains out of the line up, they're gonna make

0:45:44.280 --> 0:45:47.040
<v Speaker 1>it a decision on the i L today because it's ridiculous. Ready,

0:45:47.560 --> 0:45:51.840
<v Speaker 1>So in this lineup you had Eaten robe Less, Juan Soto,

0:45:52.400 --> 0:45:55.000
<v Speaker 1>and Howard Kendrick was playing third and batting fourth. Matt

0:45:55.000 --> 0:45:57.479
<v Speaker 1>Adams and Ryan Zimmerman also had the lineup, batting fifth.

0:45:58.520 --> 0:46:00.279
<v Speaker 1>It just shows you how much of the don't like

0:46:00.400 --> 0:46:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Raindoser right now? To me, Yeah, it's true. Look, he

0:46:04.280 --> 0:46:06.399
<v Speaker 1>was batting below Carter key Boom. Is that a sign

0:46:06.480 --> 0:46:08.440
<v Speaker 1>of you know, things to come? They like keybo more

0:46:08.480 --> 0:46:11.560
<v Speaker 1>than Doser. Perhaps we'll see what happens in the long term.

0:46:11.600 --> 0:46:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Here for the Nationals. Everyone kind of getting hurt here

0:46:14.000 --> 0:46:16.000
<v Speaker 1>for the Nationals lineup, this isn't and they're not the Yankees,

0:46:17.280 --> 0:46:19.640
<v Speaker 1>It's true, but you know, this seems like a far

0:46:19.760 --> 0:46:22.759
<v Speaker 1>cry from the lineup that we saw on opening Day.

0:46:23.960 --> 0:46:26.600
<v Speaker 1>He's weird seeing like Howie Kendrick in there and Matt

0:46:26.640 --> 0:46:29.720
<v Speaker 1>Adams batting in the middle of this lineup. It seems

0:46:29.719 --> 0:46:33.040
<v Speaker 1>weird for the Washington Nationals. So hopefully Anthony Rendon could

0:46:33.040 --> 0:46:36.120
<v Speaker 1>get back sooner rather than later. Um, we'll get that

0:46:36.200 --> 0:46:39.400
<v Speaker 1>decision regarding Randon soon. And I'm sure that they can

0:46:39.520 --> 0:46:42.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of like retroactive back to whatever days they can't

0:46:42.600 --> 0:46:45.879
<v Speaker 1>remember he played one game in there. He's just seven

0:46:45.920 --> 0:46:48.280
<v Speaker 1>out of eight. So they've been retroactive for the weekend

0:46:48.719 --> 0:46:51.279
<v Speaker 1>until the weekend, so he's he's still gonna be out

0:46:51.320 --> 0:46:55.160
<v Speaker 1>without him for a little while. Here, Hayes's aguilar who

0:46:55.160 --> 0:46:58.840
<v Speaker 1>we started because we had to this week? Did it

0:46:58.880 --> 0:47:02.320
<v Speaker 1>worked for us? To home runs last night in Miller

0:47:02.400 --> 0:47:05.799
<v Speaker 1>Park against the Rockies against Kyle Freeland, who came off

0:47:05.840 --> 0:47:08.360
<v Speaker 1>the d L. Freeland went six in six hits, five runs,

0:47:08.640 --> 0:47:11.520
<v Speaker 1>walking to and striking out three. Well, Zach Davies improved

0:47:11.520 --> 0:47:14.120
<v Speaker 1>you three and oh Frank on the season five and

0:47:14.200 --> 0:47:16.040
<v Speaker 1>the third three hits, one run. It was not earned.

0:47:16.080 --> 0:47:20.960
<v Speaker 1>He walked three while striking out two. Oh man, Zach Davies,

0:47:22.480 --> 0:47:24.239
<v Speaker 1>what is going on with the world right now? Greg?

0:47:24.440 --> 0:47:26.920
<v Speaker 1>Zach Davis has a one point three eight e R,

0:47:27.000 --> 0:47:30.560
<v Speaker 1>a five point seven case for nine, three point five

0:47:30.680 --> 0:47:33.520
<v Speaker 1>eight walks for nine. It's just what's happening? You just

0:47:33.560 --> 0:47:36.680
<v Speaker 1>did that against the Rockies lineup two is like, I

0:47:36.719 --> 0:47:38.239
<v Speaker 1>don't want to downplay what the guy did. It was

0:47:39.120 --> 0:47:41.359
<v Speaker 1>fine start for him, but you got one point three

0:47:41.400 --> 0:47:44.560
<v Speaker 1>eight year a four point nine six exits, So just

0:47:45.080 --> 0:47:47.400
<v Speaker 1>don't buy into Zach Dave for some reason you were

0:47:47.480 --> 0:47:50.000
<v Speaker 1>thinking of buying into Zach Davies. Yeah, this was great

0:47:50.040 --> 0:47:52.080
<v Speaker 1>to see from Hazer's aglar. We needed to see this

0:47:52.239 --> 0:47:55.120
<v Speaker 1>from him. We were debating dropping him in our fifteen

0:47:55.160 --> 0:47:57.040
<v Speaker 1>team roto league over the weekend. We ended up not

0:47:57.200 --> 0:47:59.239
<v Speaker 1>doing that. We get him in the lineup, he gets

0:47:59.280 --> 0:48:02.080
<v Speaker 1>off the schni here, Greggy. Three hits to home runs

0:48:02.120 --> 0:48:03.520
<v Speaker 1>and I really like the fact that one of them

0:48:03.600 --> 0:48:05.719
<v Speaker 1>was to straightaway center field and the other ones was

0:48:05.800 --> 0:48:08.440
<v Speaker 1>to opposite field to right field for a r. So

0:48:08.920 --> 0:48:10.719
<v Speaker 1>it seems like it's one of those things like once

0:48:10.800 --> 0:48:12.840
<v Speaker 1>you start seeing you see a few home runs pop,

0:48:13.120 --> 0:48:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and the way that they did center and right field,

0:48:15.520 --> 0:48:17.319
<v Speaker 1>it seems like, all right, this these are the types

0:48:17.360 --> 0:48:19.280
<v Speaker 1>of things that we need to see and maybe Hayese's

0:48:19.880 --> 0:48:22.160
<v Speaker 1>is about to come around. It was against the left

0:48:22.160 --> 0:48:25.279
<v Speaker 1>handed picture. Eric Thames wasn't in the lineup. Let's see

0:48:25.320 --> 0:48:26.960
<v Speaker 1>what happens the rest of the week when they're going

0:48:27.000 --> 0:48:28.719
<v Speaker 1>up against the righty. Do they get Eric Thames in

0:48:28.719 --> 0:48:30.920
<v Speaker 1>the lineup? Do they find ways to get both of

0:48:30.960 --> 0:48:33.600
<v Speaker 1>these guys in the lineup. It'll be interesting to see,

0:48:33.680 --> 0:48:36.960
<v Speaker 1>but definitely something we needed to see from haere if

0:48:37.280 --> 0:48:40.200
<v Speaker 1>he was dropped in twelve team leagues, should people go

0:48:40.320 --> 0:48:43.520
<v Speaker 1>out and start freaking out. I gotta get back on

0:48:43.560 --> 0:48:45.040
<v Speaker 1>my team because he's about to do what he did

0:48:45.120 --> 0:48:49.319
<v Speaker 1>last year. No, I'm not making a rash decision one day.

0:48:49.320 --> 0:48:50.759
<v Speaker 1>If you just dropped him, and you dropped him over

0:48:50.800 --> 0:48:53.040
<v Speaker 1>the weekend, I'm not running in the way over wire.

0:48:53.200 --> 0:48:55.480
<v Speaker 1>We should give it a week. There's no worse feeling,

0:48:55.520 --> 0:49:01.480
<v Speaker 1>though there is. On Sunday he goes three for four hits,

0:49:01.520 --> 0:49:05.360
<v Speaker 1>two long runs, gives you four ribbies, and you're just

0:49:05.440 --> 0:49:07.000
<v Speaker 1>staring at it on the waiver wire now and someone

0:49:07.040 --> 0:49:09.640
<v Speaker 1>else is gonna pick it up so potentially reap the

0:49:09.760 --> 0:49:12.120
<v Speaker 1>benefits of Hazel tagging out of the rest. It's a

0:49:12.200 --> 0:49:14.440
<v Speaker 1>terrible feeling. So what do you do? Now? Do you do?

0:49:14.520 --> 0:49:15.920
<v Speaker 1>You blow some of your had to get him back

0:49:15.960 --> 0:49:18.240
<v Speaker 1>on your team. You obviously drafted him for a reason.

0:49:18.840 --> 0:49:22.840
<v Speaker 1>There was something there that you liked. We it's a

0:49:22.920 --> 0:49:26.360
<v Speaker 1>tough situation. I mentioned Zach Davies, Lion. You were shaking

0:49:26.400 --> 0:49:29.560
<v Speaker 1>your head while I was giving it. How come he's

0:49:29.560 --> 0:49:32.600
<v Speaker 1>not good? He pitches to contact your pitches in Miller Park,

0:49:32.640 --> 0:49:35.279
<v Speaker 1>Greg pitches in a tough division, I say that all

0:49:35.360 --> 0:49:36.840
<v Speaker 1>with him having a one point three a e R

0:49:36.880 --> 0:49:39.520
<v Speaker 1>A and he's three and oh, but the underlying numbers

0:49:39.520 --> 0:49:42.560
<v Speaker 1>from were just not good. He's gotta he's got nowhere,

0:49:42.719 --> 0:49:44.760
<v Speaker 1>he's got a five k or nine and he almost

0:49:44.800 --> 0:49:47.640
<v Speaker 1>has a four walks for now. His x FIP is

0:49:47.640 --> 0:49:53.280
<v Speaker 1>almost five. It's bad, not good. It's very bad. Okay,

0:49:54.400 --> 0:49:57.279
<v Speaker 1>let's have somebody did then, and it's it was your

0:49:57.360 --> 0:49:59.480
<v Speaker 1>boy versus my boy last night? Did you know that?

0:50:00.920 --> 0:50:02.439
<v Speaker 1>Are you trying to figure out what I'm telling you about?

0:50:03.400 --> 0:50:07.319
<v Speaker 1>It was Mike Saroka Mikeska who went six inties, allowing

0:50:07.400 --> 0:50:12.799
<v Speaker 1>four hits, one run, striking out eight, neck meshes five

0:50:12.840 --> 0:50:17.480
<v Speaker 1>and two thirds, three runs, also strike out three. He's

0:50:17.520 --> 0:50:21.799
<v Speaker 1>defense let him down. Anything else on Nick Viscious Craig

0:50:23.480 --> 0:50:27.719
<v Speaker 1>and they also Mike Sarroca was awesome last night. He

0:50:27.880 --> 0:50:31.279
<v Speaker 1>just every start continues to impress me. I mean, his

0:50:31.520 --> 0:50:34.120
<v Speaker 1>arsenal was really good. Like his it seems like all

0:50:34.160 --> 0:50:36.640
<v Speaker 1>of his pitches have movement, like his slider is legit.

0:50:37.280 --> 0:50:40.400
<v Speaker 1>Eight strikeouts last night. I was a little surprised that

0:50:40.960 --> 0:50:43.200
<v Speaker 1>it was either last start or the start before this.

0:50:43.360 --> 0:50:45.239
<v Speaker 1>They let him go over a hundred endings almost a

0:50:45.320 --> 0:50:49.480
<v Speaker 1>hundred and ten hundred pitches, like a hundred and ten pitches,

0:50:49.719 --> 0:50:52.560
<v Speaker 1>and then last night he gets through six with only

0:50:52.920 --> 0:50:55.239
<v Speaker 1>one pitches. Would have been nice to see him go seven,

0:50:55.400 --> 0:50:57.719
<v Speaker 1>but I guess you know, if they stretched him out

0:50:57.719 --> 0:50:59.279
<v Speaker 1>a little bit too far last time. They didn't want

0:50:59.280 --> 0:51:01.400
<v Speaker 1>to push their limits. Uh and ultimately me too. I

0:51:01.440 --> 0:51:02.719
<v Speaker 1>don't want to get too greedy when it comes to

0:51:02.760 --> 0:51:04.359
<v Speaker 1>to Roca, because this is a guy who has had

0:51:04.400 --> 0:51:07.560
<v Speaker 1>shoulder issues. But it's awesome star last night only one walk,

0:51:07.640 --> 0:51:12.080
<v Speaker 1>eight strikeouts, the whip well below one. There he's getting

0:51:12.080 --> 0:51:15.279
<v Speaker 1>it done. And I would recommend streaming pictures against the

0:51:15.480 --> 0:51:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Padres line up right now. They they're very cool. I know. Um,

0:51:20.280 --> 0:51:21.840
<v Speaker 1>one of these days I would like to do some

0:51:22.760 --> 0:51:26.359
<v Speaker 1>like an all encompassing hitters Tobai and picture Tobai. Well,

0:51:26.480 --> 0:51:29.200
<v Speaker 1>I think one of them is. Tomorrow, we're gonna look

0:51:29.239 --> 0:51:31.360
<v Speaker 1>at some of the underlying statistics for the month of April,

0:51:31.520 --> 0:51:33.240
<v Speaker 1>because you know how I like to kind of summon

0:51:33.320 --> 0:51:35.680
<v Speaker 1>all up in April and March you're done. So we're

0:51:35.719 --> 0:51:38.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna take a look back at the month of April

0:51:38.160 --> 0:51:40.839
<v Speaker 1>and see certain numbers and who to buy and who

0:51:40.920 --> 0:51:42.960
<v Speaker 1>to sell, not to who we should believe in, who

0:51:43.000 --> 0:51:45.080
<v Speaker 1>we should not believe in. We do that on tomorrow

0:51:45.120 --> 0:51:49.040
<v Speaker 1>show for two hours. Let's do it all right, cool um?

0:51:49.440 --> 0:51:50.840
<v Speaker 1>And do you want to know? Ozzie Albis hit his

0:51:50.880 --> 0:51:53.319
<v Speaker 1>sixth homer of the year last night, leading off again

0:51:53.400 --> 0:51:56.719
<v Speaker 1>for the Bravos to average three fifteen at o b P.

0:51:57.120 --> 0:51:59.920
<v Speaker 1>So Chris Bench is feeling good. But by the way,

0:52:00.080 --> 0:52:03.560
<v Speaker 1>he loved Ozzie Albi's gonna get you next. That's a

0:52:03.600 --> 0:52:07.360
<v Speaker 1>venture man. Josh Tomlin picked seven yesterday and then in

0:52:07.440 --> 0:52:10.160
<v Speaker 1>the ninth without a j Mints are available, without Luke

0:52:10.280 --> 0:52:13.240
<v Speaker 1>Jackson available. They started out with Jerry Blevins, who struck

0:52:13.280 --> 0:52:17.759
<v Speaker 1>out the lefty, and then they bring in Jacob Webb,

0:52:17.800 --> 0:52:21.440
<v Speaker 1>but no Religions Joe Webb. They bring Jacob Webb, who

0:52:21.480 --> 0:52:24.759
<v Speaker 1>struck out a batterer on seven pitches, got another out

0:52:24.880 --> 0:52:27.359
<v Speaker 1>and picked up his first save ever. This team needs

0:52:27.400 --> 0:52:29.480
<v Speaker 1>to sign Craig Kimberle and be done with it. That's

0:52:29.480 --> 0:52:32.040
<v Speaker 1>all I got. Yeah. The only thing that I see

0:52:32.160 --> 0:52:34.520
<v Speaker 1>in their way right now, Greg is that draft compensation.

0:52:34.640 --> 0:52:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I think you know, once we get past that, once

0:52:37.080 --> 0:52:39.000
<v Speaker 1>we get past the MLB draft, I do believe that

0:52:39.080 --> 0:52:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Craig Kimber will be signed. I wouldn't be wouldn't surprise

0:52:42.520 --> 0:52:44.680
<v Speaker 1>me at all if he ends up with the Atlanta Braves.

0:52:45.160 --> 0:52:46.680
<v Speaker 1>But it seems like this is kind of like the

0:52:46.800 --> 0:52:48.759
<v Speaker 1>next issue in a long line of issues when it

0:52:48.840 --> 0:52:51.640
<v Speaker 1>comes to MLB and Major League Baseball in general. The

0:52:51.760 --> 0:52:54.880
<v Speaker 1>fact that people are not signing Dallas Kigl, who is

0:52:54.960 --> 0:52:57.160
<v Speaker 1>a former cy Young Award winner. I know, I thanks

0:52:57.160 --> 0:52:59.200
<v Speaker 1>to forget that Kai goes out there. Yeah, like, no

0:52:59.280 --> 0:53:01.520
<v Speaker 1>one's signing down, it's Kikol, No one signing Craig kimberall.

0:53:01.600 --> 0:53:03.800
<v Speaker 1>And we have like all these issues with like haying

0:53:04.120 --> 0:53:08.440
<v Speaker 1>baseball players right now and draft compensation and and you know,

0:53:08.600 --> 0:53:11.160
<v Speaker 1>leaving players down who deserves to be playing because of

0:53:11.239 --> 0:53:12.960
<v Speaker 1>service time. Like there's a lot of issues going on

0:53:13.040 --> 0:53:16.160
<v Speaker 1>in baseball overall. But this guy, Jacob Webb just looked

0:53:16.160 --> 0:53:18.279
<v Speaker 1>into him. He has twenty three careers saves in the minor,

0:53:18.320 --> 0:53:19.839
<v Speaker 1>so he has been used as a reliever. He has

0:53:19.880 --> 0:53:23.040
<v Speaker 1>some experience as a closer, um at least saving games.

0:53:24.080 --> 0:53:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't really expect much from him here. I think

0:53:26.120 --> 0:53:27.960
<v Speaker 1>it's just because those guys had the night off a

0:53:28.040 --> 0:53:31.040
<v Speaker 1>j mentor. But Mintor has not been good. Luke Jackson

0:53:31.080 --> 0:53:33.680
<v Speaker 1>has been pretty good. So we'll see what comes of this.

0:53:34.120 --> 0:53:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Would be another you know, three headed situation here for

0:53:36.640 --> 0:53:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the Atlanta Braves. We mentioned Tim Anderson before. Tim Anderson

0:53:40.600 --> 0:53:44.359
<v Speaker 1>is arguably the hottest player in baseball at this point.

0:53:44.400 --> 0:53:46.759
<v Speaker 1>Another home run last night for Tim Anderson. He's six

0:53:46.840 --> 0:53:49.560
<v Speaker 1>of the year. Um, he's just been on a fight.

0:53:49.600 --> 0:53:51.800
<v Speaker 1>If you just look at what he has done on

0:53:51.920 --> 0:53:54.920
<v Speaker 1>the self proclaimed Jackie Robinson of baseball, He's got a

0:53:55.040 --> 0:53:58.399
<v Speaker 1>three seventy five with six homers, eighteen ribbyes, he has

0:53:58.520 --> 0:54:01.560
<v Speaker 1>ten stolen bases or Eddie uh. Anderson has been on

0:54:01.600 --> 0:54:03.480
<v Speaker 1>a fire. As the White Sox proved to five and three,

0:54:03.560 --> 0:54:06.480
<v Speaker 1>just two games under five. Now have tension basis, Yes

0:54:06.520 --> 0:54:15.040
<v Speaker 1>he does. Gosh wow, two games under five. Yeah, it's unbelievable. Man.

0:54:15.640 --> 0:54:19.320
<v Speaker 1>And how about this man Bam picks off his second

0:54:19.360 --> 0:54:22.080
<v Speaker 1>win five and two thirds, five minutes, two runs, three walks,

0:54:22.120 --> 0:54:26.040
<v Speaker 1>six strikeouts, with Urban Santana being designated for assignment, Manny

0:54:26.080 --> 0:54:29.400
<v Speaker 1>Manualos staying in the rotation. I have to ask it, Frank,

0:54:29.719 --> 0:54:34.160
<v Speaker 1>are you interested in Manny Manualos? Gregg, Yes, you're late

0:54:34.239 --> 0:54:36.479
<v Speaker 1>to this one. I picked him up in a league

0:54:36.800 --> 0:54:39.680
<v Speaker 1>man picked him up in the Great Fantasy based Limitational

0:54:39.760 --> 0:54:43.680
<v Speaker 1>and started him last night, Greg, I had Homer Bailey

0:54:43.719 --> 0:54:46.000
<v Speaker 1>on that team. I needed to pick up a two

0:54:46.000 --> 0:54:49.000
<v Speaker 1>star picture. I was like, all right, Manny bn Wualos

0:54:49.400 --> 0:54:54.839
<v Speaker 1>owned in my league. That's insane, dude, Look Manny Ben

0:54:54.920 --> 0:54:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Whales so not is not a must owned player by

0:54:57.600 --> 0:54:59.040
<v Speaker 1>any means. I picked him up because he had a

0:54:59.040 --> 0:55:02.839
<v Speaker 1>two star week maybe in fifteen team. Mixed a little

0:55:02.880 --> 0:55:04.719
<v Speaker 1>bit of interest there. I mean, this is a journeyman.

0:55:05.120 --> 0:55:07.640
<v Speaker 1>He did have prospect pedigree with the Yankees back in

0:55:07.680 --> 0:55:11.160
<v Speaker 1>the day, just twenty eight. This is a guy who

0:55:11.200 --> 0:55:13.800
<v Speaker 1>I know Nando wanted to be a thing forever. Seems

0:55:13.800 --> 0:55:15.759
<v Speaker 1>like he's getting a bit of an opportunity here for

0:55:16.440 --> 0:55:18.440
<v Speaker 1>the Chicago White Sox. They don't have a ton of

0:55:18.520 --> 0:55:22.879
<v Speaker 1>great pictures on their team, So mild interest, Like AO

0:55:22.960 --> 0:55:26.759
<v Speaker 1>only he should be owned. Maybe make sho that like,

0:55:27.040 --> 0:55:28.680
<v Speaker 1>don't not pick this guy up in a twelve team.

0:55:28.719 --> 0:55:31.600
<v Speaker 1>So here's what Frank is the reason he's saying that.

0:55:31.840 --> 0:55:33.759
<v Speaker 1>So it's caper and he's okay, it's eight and a half.

0:55:34.400 --> 0:55:37.280
<v Speaker 1>The walks for nine not as okay at around five

0:55:38.000 --> 0:55:43.319
<v Speaker 1>nine five. This season, he's piping x FI over four

0:55:43.520 --> 0:55:49.239
<v Speaker 1>not like terribly over former, but over four hr. Yeah,

0:55:49.360 --> 0:55:54.239
<v Speaker 1>he's man, I mean having that second start to me

0:55:54.440 --> 0:56:00.680
<v Speaker 1>shrike right right now, Boston h started star Well. I

0:56:00.719 --> 0:56:03.240
<v Speaker 1>got what I needed to last night against the Orioles.

0:56:03.239 --> 0:56:06.640
<v Speaker 1>They get a win out of Manny band Wlas. I

0:56:06.680 --> 0:56:08.040
<v Speaker 1>gotta I gotta do a little bit of a deep

0:56:08.080 --> 0:56:12.600
<v Speaker 1>dive to Manderson walk rate that's standard to Manderson. So

0:56:12.680 --> 0:56:16.080
<v Speaker 1>that was my question right with Tim Anderson hard hit rate?

0:56:16.280 --> 0:56:18.440
<v Speaker 1>What are you selling Tim Anderson for? What are you

0:56:18.520 --> 0:56:23.360
<v Speaker 1>buying Tim Manderson? Four? How real is Tim Anderson? This

0:56:23.520 --> 0:56:26.480
<v Speaker 1>is a guy, in all fairness, he has a tent

0:56:26.560 --> 0:56:28.520
<v Speaker 1>hard hit rate. He's a thirty percent hard hit rate

0:56:28.600 --> 0:56:30.600
<v Speaker 1>for his career. So he's been able to put up

0:56:30.600 --> 0:56:33.000
<v Speaker 1>good numbers even without the best bat a ball data.

0:56:33.520 --> 0:56:35.960
<v Speaker 1>He's not going to maintain a three seventy five batting average.

0:56:37.680 --> 0:56:38.879
<v Speaker 1>This is probably one of the guys for the next

0:56:38.920 --> 0:56:40.840
<v Speaker 1>couple of days that we'll talk about. Greg's like, what

0:56:40.920 --> 0:56:43.239
<v Speaker 1>do you do Ryan? Sell them? Do you just keep him?

0:56:43.640 --> 0:56:45.720
<v Speaker 1>I think I would just reap the rewards for the football.

0:56:45.840 --> 0:56:46.839
<v Speaker 1>Next with Jim and Chris