WEBVTT - Chiefs Lose, Purdy For MVP? & Caleb To The Patriots?

0:00:01.720 --> 0:00:04.480
<v Speaker 1>This episode is brought to you by Unstoppable. Discover the

0:00:04.519 --> 0:00:07.880
<v Speaker 1>inspiring true story about Anthony Roebliss, who defined every expectation

0:00:07.960 --> 0:00:10.840
<v Speaker 1>to become a national wrestling champion, and Unstoppable, a new

0:00:10.880 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>original movie from Amazon MGM Studios and director William Goldenberg,

0:00:14.560 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>evoking the excitement and camaraderie of classic sports dramas and

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:21.160
<v Speaker 1>thrilling wrestling matches. Unstoppable features an all star ensemble cast

0:00:21.239 --> 0:00:24.759
<v Speaker 1>including Jirelle Jerome, Jennifer Lopez, Don Cheatle, Michael Panha, and

0:00:24.760 --> 0:00:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Bobby Canavali. Watch Unstoppable now exclusively on Amazon Prime Video.

0:00:42.360 --> 0:00:46.440
<v Speaker 2>Welcome in episode one ninety five, What's Right with Nick Wright?

0:00:47.600 --> 0:00:52.440
<v Speaker 2>And there's obviously a big story people are tuning in

0:00:52.479 --> 0:00:55.440
<v Speaker 2>to get my reaction to. So Demanzi's gonna join us

0:00:55.440 --> 0:00:58.160
<v Speaker 2>in just a moment. We'll get right to it. We

0:00:58.200 --> 0:01:00.360
<v Speaker 2>have a very long show, and I have a very

0:01:00.400 --> 0:01:06.080
<v Speaker 2>long day I have. You know, I anticipated last night

0:01:06.160 --> 0:01:09.679
<v Speaker 2>maybe going a little differently when I scheduled my Tuesday

0:01:09.760 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 2>as follows the What's Right Show, then on Colin Coward's

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 2>TV show, then my own TV show, then Mina Kimes podcast,

0:01:19.520 --> 0:01:23.759
<v Speaker 2>then Colin Coward's podcast, that's all happening in the next

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:26.960
<v Speaker 2>twelve hours, and it was supposed to be a glorious

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:31.919
<v Speaker 2>celebration of sorts. It would appear the road to celebration

0:01:32.040 --> 0:01:34.480
<v Speaker 2>has taken a slight detour. But before we get to

0:01:34.560 --> 0:01:38.720
<v Speaker 2>any of that, here's what missed the cut. Taylor Swift

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 2>doesn't go to the Eagles Chiefs game. Maybe that hadn't impact.

0:01:43.400 --> 0:01:45.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure. The f one in Vegas has gotten

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 2>mixed reviews, and something that did not get mixed reviews Demansey.

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:55.240
<v Speaker 2>I watched Top Gun Maverick, and after being very unimpressed

0:01:55.280 --> 0:01:59.040
<v Speaker 2>by the original Top Gun, I must say Top Gun

0:01:59.080 --> 0:02:02.520
<v Speaker 2>Maverick was all it was cracked up to be. That

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:05.760
<v Speaker 2>is a damn good movie. I think you would enjoy it.

0:02:06.000 --> 0:02:11.239
<v Speaker 2>Gabe was right about that. Yeah, the new one, Yeah,

0:02:11.320 --> 0:02:16.399
<v Speaker 2>the you've seen the new Top Gun? Yeah? Oh yeah,

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:22.000
<v Speaker 2>no last year. It's damn good movie. That one, Okay, Yeah,

0:02:22.240 --> 0:02:25.160
<v Speaker 2>I mean that was very impressive by you also missed

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:28.080
<v Speaker 2>the cut. Jordan Poole finally got his thirty points. He

0:02:28.120 --> 0:02:31.040
<v Speaker 2>also doesn't understand how the clock works in the NBA,

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:36.960
<v Speaker 2>but demon's we've got to get to it. The big story.

0:02:37.000 --> 0:02:39.960
<v Speaker 2>You don't even have to intro it. It's what everyone's

0:02:40.000 --> 0:02:45.000
<v Speaker 2>talking about this morning, waiting for my reaction. And I

0:02:45.040 --> 0:02:50.000
<v Speaker 2>can't say we didn't see this coming. But when an

0:02:50.040 --> 0:02:55.440
<v Speaker 2>offense is as perpetually inept as this offense has been,

0:02:56.520 --> 0:03:01.680
<v Speaker 2>things happen. And the Steelers have fired Canada, and I

0:03:01.760 --> 0:03:05.320
<v Speaker 2>gotta tell you, I mean, I don't know what it

0:03:05.400 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 2>means for Kenny Pickett. Maybe it helps him turn around.

0:03:09.639 --> 0:03:12.320
<v Speaker 2>What do you guys? I hear laughter in the background.

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:14.280
<v Speaker 2>This is the breaking news. Do you not follow schefter?

0:03:14.720 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 2>This happened. This is what people are here for. I mean,

0:03:18.440 --> 0:03:23.080
<v Speaker 2>this is, you know, perennial AFC power. This is a

0:03:23.120 --> 0:03:26.480
<v Speaker 2>team fighting for the playoffs and divisions that's in such

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:30.560
<v Speaker 2>offensive disarray. They are now the second AFC team in

0:03:30.600 --> 0:03:34.560
<v Speaker 2>the last week to fire their offensive coordinator. First it's

0:03:34.960 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 2>you know, Ken Dorsey with the Bills. Now it's Matt

0:03:37.720 --> 0:03:40.880
<v Speaker 2>Canada with the Steelers. I just I you know, I

0:03:41.160 --> 0:03:43.680
<v Speaker 2>would tune in to Andrew Philipponi on ninety three seven

0:03:43.720 --> 0:03:46.320
<v Speaker 2>The Fan in Pittsburgh for more in depth coverage of

0:03:46.360 --> 0:03:50.440
<v Speaker 2>this story. But I would imagine, you know that would

0:03:50.880 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 2>I would hope what we I'm gonna be talking with

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:56.520
<v Speaker 2>cowhurt about I noticed that's not what happens to be

0:03:56.560 --> 0:03:59.720
<v Speaker 2>at the top of the rundown. So demons, go ahead,

0:03:59.720 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 2>what we starting with today? I'm sorry, I just I

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:05.600
<v Speaker 2>thought we were breaking news show. I thought I apologize.

0:04:05.600 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead.

0:04:07.040 --> 0:04:09.800
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, so there was the old litmus test last night.

0:04:10.480 --> 0:04:13.960
<v Speaker 3>Things weren't so lit for you, beloved Chiefs. They did

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 3>miss some drop passes, touchdown passes. Apparently Scantling didn't get

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:20.400
<v Speaker 3>the memo and thought this was a practice game. This

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:23.880
<v Speaker 3>is a Super Bowl rematch. But you went to an

0:04:24.040 --> 0:04:27.279
<v Speaker 3>Eagles bar with your pops to watch the Chief.

0:04:27.520 --> 0:04:33.239
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs Chiefs in Philly. So so I so, here's the deal.

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:38.640
<v Speaker 2>I'm going to I'm gonna kind of speed run my

0:04:38.800 --> 0:04:41.599
<v Speaker 2>thoughts on the game and then spend a lot of

0:04:41.680 --> 0:04:46.159
<v Speaker 2>time on my evening because I actually think that could

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 2>be more important if you will. Here's I'm in a

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:56.320
<v Speaker 2>rough spot when it comes to the talking about the game,

0:04:56.839 --> 0:04:58.280
<v Speaker 2>and I'm not I don't want to. I'm not gonna

0:04:58.320 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 2>do the podcast of disservice. But I have an entire

0:05:04.320 --> 0:05:10.040
<v Speaker 2>television staff, including co hosts, all plotting my demise today.

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:13.680
<v Speaker 2>We have two of our lead producers, Dusty who's our

0:05:13.800 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 2>number one viewer of this podcast is a diehard Eagles fan.

0:05:17.839 --> 0:05:21.919
<v Speaker 2>Cab is a big Eagles fan. Cab who never texts me,

0:05:22.360 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 2>just text me an Eagle emoji shortly after the final

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:31.799
<v Speaker 2>whistle last night. Wild's and Brew just regularly just team

0:05:31.920 --> 0:05:37.599
<v Speaker 2>up against me and Manginie's there today. So the problem

0:05:37.640 --> 0:05:41.880
<v Speaker 2>that I have is this, if I lay out my

0:05:42.240 --> 0:05:45.719
<v Speaker 2>full case as to why the Chiefs are just gonna

0:05:45.720 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 2>be fine, I am giving them four extra hours to

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:57.320
<v Speaker 2>prepare to argue with me on television. Meanwhile, they Wild's

0:05:57.360 --> 0:05:59.840
<v Speaker 2>and Brew will both be sitting in their offices with

0:05:59.880 --> 0:06:03.320
<v Speaker 2>the doors closed, having all the producers working for them.

0:06:03.720 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 2>It's like one on seventeen on First Things First today,

0:06:07.080 --> 0:06:10.919
<v Speaker 2>And so I don't want to reveal my full game plan,

0:06:11.400 --> 0:06:16.040
<v Speaker 2>but here is what I will say. Okay, I understand

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:22.240
<v Speaker 2>that everyone today is going to have the same opinion, Uh,

0:06:22.560 --> 0:06:26.640
<v Speaker 2>catch the football. You're gonna watch sports TV all over

0:06:26.960 --> 0:06:30.480
<v Speaker 2>both networks, all the shows, and everyone's gonna have this

0:06:30.920 --> 0:06:34.120
<v Speaker 2>in brilliant take. When you throw a pass, catch the best.

0:06:34.640 --> 0:06:37.080
<v Speaker 2>And if the Chiefs don't catch passes, it's hard to

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:40.000
<v Speaker 2>get first downs and score points. And everyone's gonna act

0:06:40.080 --> 0:06:42.440
<v Speaker 2>like they reinvented the wheel on this. They're like, you know,

0:06:42.720 --> 0:06:44.760
<v Speaker 2>I remember, I'm old enough to remember when the Chiefs

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:47.680
<v Speaker 2>had an awesome wide receiver. Whatever happened to him, maybe

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:49.000
<v Speaker 2>they should try to get it. Do you think they

0:06:49.120 --> 0:06:51.599
<v Speaker 2>get him back? That's what everyone's gonna say. And I'm

0:06:51.600 --> 0:06:54.240
<v Speaker 2>here to tell you that's not the story last night.

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:58.880
<v Speaker 2>And Dusty, if you tell brew this is my take,

0:06:59.240 --> 0:07:02.520
<v Speaker 2>I'll never speak again because Bru doesn't watch this podcast.

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:05.840
<v Speaker 2>So there, he's not gonna know unless you tell him, Dusty,

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:09.159
<v Speaker 2>and none of you guys tweet to him either. The

0:07:09.240 --> 0:07:15.520
<v Speaker 2>story of last night. Yes, the Chiefs would have won

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:19.160
<v Speaker 2>if they could have caught the ball. Yes, right now

0:07:19.600 --> 0:07:24.280
<v Speaker 2>they have a bad receiver group that's not really deniable.

0:07:24.600 --> 0:07:26.440
<v Speaker 2>I don't think it's worse than it was last year

0:07:26.440 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 2>that they won the Super Bowl with. But last year

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:32.600
<v Speaker 2>maybe Mark Wisvaldas Scantling catches that pass. And while I

0:07:32.640 --> 0:07:36.640
<v Speaker 2>think Rashi Rice is better than Juju, Smith Schuster Mahomes

0:07:36.640 --> 0:07:40.160
<v Speaker 2>seems to trust Juju more than he trusts Rice. Seems

0:07:40.200 --> 0:07:42.880
<v Speaker 2>like the guy you trust the most is Justin Watson,

0:07:43.360 --> 0:07:46.720
<v Speaker 2>the kid from Penn who made one really good catch,

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:49.880
<v Speaker 2>but also had a few critical drops. But none of

0:07:49.880 --> 0:07:54.200
<v Speaker 2>that is the story. And if people can take a

0:07:54.360 --> 0:07:59.280
<v Speaker 2>deep breath and take a step back, the story from

0:07:59.320 --> 0:08:06.600
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs the side of things is, while yes, a win,

0:08:07.040 --> 0:08:09.239
<v Speaker 2>they should have won the game. They were in position

0:08:09.280 --> 0:08:12.280
<v Speaker 2>to win the game. They blew a double digit halftime lead,

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:15.160
<v Speaker 2>They had bad drops. It was ugly, all of it.

0:08:16.320 --> 0:08:21.400
<v Speaker 2>But the Chiefs played a team that not only has

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:23.680
<v Speaker 2>the best record in football, not only last year had

0:08:23.720 --> 0:08:27.120
<v Speaker 2>the best record in the NFC, maybe all football. Not

0:08:27.160 --> 0:08:28.760
<v Speaker 2>I think it was just the type of the Chiefs

0:08:28.800 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 2>best record in football, but a team who is known

0:08:33.000 --> 0:08:40.079
<v Speaker 2>for having the most physical, most dominating offensive and defensive

0:08:40.120 --> 0:08:45.560
<v Speaker 2>lines in the NFL. That is their calling card. And

0:08:45.679 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 2>the Kansaity Chiefs last night at Arrowhead pushed them around

0:08:50.800 --> 0:08:54.360
<v Speaker 2>on both sides of the ball. Now they couldn't finish

0:08:54.440 --> 0:08:57.360
<v Speaker 2>it off. And the Eagles, I'm taking nothing away from them.

0:08:57.600 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 2>That is a team that knows how to win football games,

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:04.280
<v Speaker 2>that finds ways to win football games. And Jalen Hurts

0:09:04.559 --> 0:09:07.079
<v Speaker 2>being able to have as bad of a game as

0:09:07.080 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 2>he was having and then still making that pass to

0:09:10.080 --> 0:09:13.000
<v Speaker 2>Devonte Smith that was the biggest play of the game.

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 2>That's that is what allows you to become a great

0:09:18.320 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 2>quarterback is when even when you're having a bad game,

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:25.520
<v Speaker 2>that you can make the critical play. Credit to him

0:09:25.960 --> 0:09:30.520
<v Speaker 2>and the and I get it. People are gonna say yeah,

0:09:30.559 --> 0:09:32.920
<v Speaker 2>and DeVante caught it, and then Mahomes made an even

0:09:32.960 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 2>better play and MBS dropped it. I understand that. But

0:09:37.920 --> 0:09:43.640
<v Speaker 2>I watched a football game last night where the Kansas

0:09:43.679 --> 0:09:48.360
<v Speaker 2>City Chiefs could run the ball all over an Eagles

0:09:48.360 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 2>team that no one has been able to run on

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:54.959
<v Speaker 2>all year. And I watched the Chiefs team last night

0:09:55.679 --> 0:10:00.360
<v Speaker 2>that could get to Jalen Hurts in a way no

0:10:00.400 --> 0:10:05.520
<v Speaker 2>one has gotten to him all year, a team that

0:10:05.800 --> 0:10:10.240
<v Speaker 2>was so dominant through the first three quarters defensively, the

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:13.240
<v Speaker 2>Eagles didn't even have an opportunity to do their brotherly

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 2>shove play because they were never in third and short,

0:10:17.280 --> 0:10:19.320
<v Speaker 2>and the one time they were in it, they for

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:22.440
<v Speaker 2>some reason did like a shotgun handoff and that got

0:10:22.440 --> 0:10:26.280
<v Speaker 2>blown up. Oh no, And then later in the game

0:10:26.320 --> 0:10:28.520
<v Speaker 2>they finally were able to do it in the fourth quarter.

0:10:28.800 --> 0:10:32.960
<v Speaker 2>And I'm not taking anything away from Philadelphia. They earned

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:37.000
<v Speaker 2>that win. That was that is the type of win

0:10:37.920 --> 0:10:44.640
<v Speaker 2>that if that when the Chiefs have won games like that,

0:10:44.840 --> 0:10:48.480
<v Speaker 2>not really that style, but where they are thoroughly outplayed

0:10:48.600 --> 0:10:52.480
<v Speaker 2>and then steal it at the end. That's what makes

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:56.040
<v Speaker 2>you feel like this is a special team. So I'm

0:10:56.160 --> 0:11:01.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm throwing there. There's so much confused in today's media

0:11:01.679 --> 0:11:05.520
<v Speaker 2>in my opinion on that the NFL is not college football.

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:08.800
<v Speaker 2>That is not about style points that it is not

0:11:08.960 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 2>about margin of victory in especially when it's two good

0:11:13.120 --> 0:11:16.120
<v Speaker 2>teams playing or two great teams playing. It's about finding

0:11:16.160 --> 0:11:18.600
<v Speaker 2>a way to win the football game. And the Eagles

0:11:19.400 --> 0:11:21.240
<v Speaker 2>over the last two years have done that as well

0:11:21.280 --> 0:11:23.679
<v Speaker 2>as anyone other than the Chiefs. And they just went

0:11:23.720 --> 0:11:26.200
<v Speaker 2>to Arrowhead and beat the Chiefs, So I give them

0:11:26.240 --> 0:11:30.360
<v Speaker 2>full credit. But I watched that game and I said,

0:11:31.760 --> 0:11:37.080
<v Speaker 2>there were giant segments of the game that it felt

0:11:37.080 --> 0:11:41.960
<v Speaker 2>like the Chiefs dominated them, not that made a couple

0:11:42.000 --> 0:11:45.560
<v Speaker 2>big plays, but methodically on both sides of the ball,

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 2>dominated them. And then here's the I know everyone today

0:11:51.240 --> 0:11:55.480
<v Speaker 2>Demons is going to talk about the drops and they

0:11:55.559 --> 0:11:58.080
<v Speaker 2>league the leading drops and the first game of the

0:11:58.160 --> 0:12:00.960
<v Speaker 2>year they had a fourth and twenty four to you

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:03.920
<v Speaker 2>know what I mean, keep the game alive. Mahomes throws

0:12:03.960 --> 0:12:07.120
<v Speaker 2>it perfectly and it gets dropped. Last night they had

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:09.960
<v Speaker 2>a fourth and twenty five after a previous drop, he

0:12:10.080 --> 0:12:12.720
<v Speaker 2>somehow throws it perfectly and gets dropped. I understand that.

0:12:14.360 --> 0:12:18.480
<v Speaker 2>The reason I am not as focused on that as

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:24.400
<v Speaker 2>everyone else is is with all those drops, do you

0:12:24.520 --> 0:12:30.400
<v Speaker 2>know why the Chiefs lost that game? Because they're three

0:12:30.520 --> 0:12:38.440
<v Speaker 2>most important people all made critical mistakes. Patrick Mahomes through

0:12:38.520 --> 0:12:42.880
<v Speaker 2>a terrible red zone interception. Terrible. It was a bad play.

0:12:43.920 --> 0:12:46.439
<v Speaker 2>He wasn't under pressure, he just had a bad play.

0:12:47.160 --> 0:12:51.480
<v Speaker 2>I believe Patrick Mahomes is not going to duplicate that mistake.

0:12:52.080 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 2>Travis Kelcey, the greatest tight endeavor, very similarly to the

0:12:57.559 --> 0:13:02.160
<v Speaker 2>regular season game last year against the Bengals, fumbled the

0:13:02.200 --> 0:13:04.560
<v Speaker 2>ball when they were trying to go up two scores

0:13:04.880 --> 0:13:07.640
<v Speaker 2>and took points off the board. And the last person

0:13:07.720 --> 0:13:12.120
<v Speaker 2>is Andy Reid. Reid didn't make a singular mistake. But

0:13:12.559 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 2>the Chiefs haven't scored in the second half last three weeks.

0:13:15.400 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 2>They are right now the number two first half scoring

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:21.400
<v Speaker 2>team in the league and then the dead last second

0:13:21.440 --> 0:13:23.959
<v Speaker 2>half scoring team in the league. That's halftime adjustments, right

0:13:24.520 --> 0:13:28.680
<v Speaker 2>That is the other team making more adjustments at the

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:31.680
<v Speaker 2>half than you are. So that's on Andy. So the

0:13:31.760 --> 0:13:39.920
<v Speaker 2>reason I feel fine and is if I cannot sit

0:13:40.000 --> 0:13:43.080
<v Speaker 2>here and tell you I know with full confidence that

0:13:43.120 --> 0:13:46.000
<v Speaker 2>these receivers who've been dropping passes all year are going

0:13:46.040 --> 0:13:48.960
<v Speaker 2>to stop dropping passes. What I can tell you with

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:52.040
<v Speaker 2>full confidence is I don't think they have to stop

0:13:52.120 --> 0:13:57.760
<v Speaker 2>dropping passes. If those three future first ballot Hall of Famers,

0:13:57.800 --> 0:14:00.440
<v Speaker 2>some of the best to ever do what they do,

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:04.560
<v Speaker 2>clean up their stuff, and I guarantee that's how those

0:14:04.600 --> 0:14:07.520
<v Speaker 2>guys feel. And yeah, that's holding them to an unfair

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:10.240
<v Speaker 2>standard whatever it is. That's when you are the most

0:14:10.240 --> 0:14:13.200
<v Speaker 2>talented quarterback ever, the greatest tight endeavor and one of

0:14:13.200 --> 0:14:17.480
<v Speaker 2>the greatest coaches ever, that's the standard. And so that's

0:14:17.720 --> 0:14:21.360
<v Speaker 2>so that's where I land on that. I want to

0:14:21.400 --> 0:14:25.640
<v Speaker 2>talk about my evening as well, but I know demand's

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:28.480
<v Speaker 2>your beloved Ravens are now the one seed. I think

0:14:28.560 --> 0:14:31.080
<v Speaker 2>you have a follow up question about them in regards

0:14:31.120 --> 0:14:31.560
<v Speaker 2>to that.

0:14:32.240 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 3>They are the one seed. Do you think that with

0:14:34.760 --> 0:14:37.600
<v Speaker 3>that loss of the Eagles the Arrowhead Invitationals in jeopardy?

0:14:38.560 --> 0:14:42.560
<v Speaker 2>Absolutely not, And the reason for that's very simple. The

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:47.560
<v Speaker 2>Ravens and the Chiefs don't play this year, so in order,

0:14:47.720 --> 0:14:51.960
<v Speaker 2>so the tiebreaker if they have the same record, is

0:14:52.000 --> 0:14:55.120
<v Speaker 2>gonna come down to conference record. The Ravens have three

0:14:55.120 --> 0:14:58.720
<v Speaker 2>conference losses the Chiefs have won, so if they finished

0:14:58.760 --> 0:15:02.640
<v Speaker 2>with the same record, it's almost impossible for the Ravens

0:15:02.680 --> 0:15:05.520
<v Speaker 2>to have a higher seat to be above the Chiefs.

0:15:06.160 --> 0:15:09.560
<v Speaker 2>And then if you just look at what Kansas City

0:15:09.600 --> 0:15:13.920
<v Speaker 2>has the rest of the way, it's the Raiders, Packers, Bills.

0:15:13.960 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 2>That could be a tough game depending on where we

0:15:15.960 --> 0:15:20.360
<v Speaker 2>are on the roller coaster, Patriots Raiders Bengals, which was

0:15:20.400 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 2>supposed to be a tough game but now features Jake

0:15:22.640 --> 0:15:26.200
<v Speaker 2>Browning and then the Chargers, who at that point are

0:15:26.440 --> 0:15:28.760
<v Speaker 2>who even knows who's playing for them because they are

0:15:28.960 --> 0:15:31.360
<v Speaker 2>at four mate. Now, maybe that's a tough game against

0:15:31.360 --> 0:15:38.600
<v Speaker 2>the Chargers because they're you know, yeah, but more likely

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 2>their coach has been fired. And you know what I mean,

0:15:41.880 --> 0:15:45.280
<v Speaker 2>it's you know, we're in one two, three can coon season,

0:15:45.720 --> 0:15:50.480
<v Speaker 2>so I it is even if you think the Chiefs

0:15:50.560 --> 0:15:54.720
<v Speaker 2>have two more losses in them, which I do not.

0:15:55.560 --> 0:15:59.000
<v Speaker 2>The question is, are the Ravens with their schedule of

0:15:59.240 --> 0:16:02.200
<v Speaker 2>at the Chargers home for the Rams, at the Jags

0:16:02.360 --> 0:16:05.440
<v Speaker 2>at the Niners home for the Dolphins, home for the Steelers.

0:16:05.960 --> 0:16:09.440
<v Speaker 2>If the Chiefs lose twice more, the Ravens have to

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:12.440
<v Speaker 2>go five and one down the stretch if they go,

0:16:12.600 --> 0:16:16.560
<v Speaker 2>and I don't think that's gonna yeah, go ahead, likely

0:16:16.800 --> 0:16:21.480
<v Speaker 2>well for the record, even five and one I don't

0:16:21.520 --> 0:16:23.800
<v Speaker 2>think gets the Ravens the one seed because I don't

0:16:23.800 --> 0:16:26.840
<v Speaker 2>think the Chiefs have two losses on that schedule. Even

0:16:26.880 --> 0:16:29.400
<v Speaker 2>if you say they're gonna lose to Buffalo, losing to

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 2>the Patriots is an impossibility. The Wills, the Raiders have

0:16:33.040 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 2>beaten them once in six years, like it's gonna be

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:43.080
<v Speaker 2>I don't know. Maybe maybe they are. I mean, they

0:16:43.120 --> 0:16:45.400
<v Speaker 2>did just lose. They has scored fourteen points and lost

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:50.760
<v Speaker 2>to Miami. All right. I actually considered if the Chiefs

0:16:50.760 --> 0:16:57.240
<v Speaker 2>said one, and this is the I almost if the

0:16:57.320 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 2>Chiefs said one, I was gonna lead with this and

0:17:00.640 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 2>this is what I was saying, was maybe the more

0:17:03.720 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 2>important thing. But because they lost, it would have seemed

0:17:07.040 --> 0:17:12.560
<v Speaker 2>cowardly if I did so. Last night, my dad, who

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:14.800
<v Speaker 2>lives in Kansas City and who I grew up going

0:17:14.840 --> 0:17:20.120
<v Speaker 2>to Chiefs games with, came to New York and then

0:17:20.200 --> 0:17:23.720
<v Speaker 2>he and I drove to Philadelphia to a Chiefs bar

0:17:23.880 --> 0:17:26.600
<v Speaker 2>called Big Charley's, which I'm actually wearing the sweatshirt that

0:17:26.640 --> 0:17:30.240
<v Speaker 2>they gave me. So it's a Chiefs bar in Philly.

0:17:30.760 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 2>And it was you know, my dad lives in Kansas City,

0:17:33.800 --> 0:17:36.480
<v Speaker 2>flies to New York, so we can drive to Philadelphia

0:17:36.520 --> 0:17:39.320
<v Speaker 2>for a game against Philadelphia that's taking place in Kansas

0:17:39.320 --> 0:17:42.200
<v Speaker 2>City to watch it at a Kansaity base bar. That's

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:45.520
<v Speaker 2>the TikTok of it, if you will. And it was.

0:17:45.520 --> 0:17:49.359
<v Speaker 2>They were great people. It was an unbelievable environment. I

0:17:49.359 --> 0:17:52.640
<v Speaker 2>put out some videos some pictures, is great, but that's

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:56.600
<v Speaker 2>not actually the part that I want to talk about.

0:17:57.840 --> 0:18:02.600
<v Speaker 2>And the h and I don't know how long I'm

0:18:02.600 --> 0:18:05.479
<v Speaker 2>gonna talk about this, and I don't and I I

0:18:05.600 --> 0:18:07.359
<v Speaker 2>kind of know what I want to say, but I

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:14.000
<v Speaker 2>don't exactly know how I should say it. But this

0:18:14.080 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 2>is our last show before Thanksgiving, and there's gonna be

0:18:17.320 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 2>a lot of people around family, you know this, you

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:25.399
<v Speaker 2>know here in the next few days, and you know,

0:18:25.520 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 2>I will have the pleasure of having my Demands and

0:18:29.119 --> 0:18:32.840
<v Speaker 2>Dior and Deanna and Me and Danielle all together for

0:18:32.880 --> 0:18:37.200
<v Speaker 2>the first time in you know, three months since your

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:44.760
<v Speaker 2>went off to college. But so I'm almost forty years old,

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:51.320
<v Speaker 2>and it's a weird thing I think, and I hope

0:18:51.359 --> 0:18:54.239
<v Speaker 2>that there are some guys out there listening. I know

0:18:54.280 --> 0:18:56.640
<v Speaker 2>we have women female listeners, but I'm gonna talk about

0:18:56.640 --> 0:19:04.000
<v Speaker 2>fathers and sons here for a moment. And it's like

0:19:04.080 --> 0:19:06.879
<v Speaker 2>a unique spot because I do this show with the momse.

0:19:07.960 --> 0:19:10.520
<v Speaker 2>But it's a weird thing for a lot of I

0:19:10.520 --> 0:19:14.960
<v Speaker 2>think guys around my age, especially once we have kids

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 2>of our own, where your maybe connection point or relationship

0:19:23.600 --> 0:19:27.800
<v Speaker 2>with your own father. I don't want to say it

0:19:27.880 --> 0:19:34.439
<v Speaker 2>can fray, but you're busy and you're worried about your kids,

0:19:35.119 --> 0:19:39.560
<v Speaker 2>and especially if you live in different cities and it's

0:19:39.640 --> 0:19:43.040
<v Speaker 2>it's the again. I'm gonna say maybe some things that

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:47.000
<v Speaker 2>are hopefully, you know, as generations move on, people are

0:19:47.040 --> 0:19:51.680
<v Speaker 2>more evolved or whatever it is. But especially it's two

0:19:51.720 --> 0:19:55.359
<v Speaker 2>men and it's like he knows I love him, I

0:19:55.440 --> 0:20:02.520
<v Speaker 2>know he loves me, and you can maybe like take

0:20:02.840 --> 0:20:05.880
<v Speaker 2>the no, I don't want to say take for granted

0:20:05.920 --> 0:20:11.680
<v Speaker 2>the relationship, but you can allow a lot of things

0:20:11.760 --> 0:20:19.560
<v Speaker 2>to go undiscussed or unsaid or unasked about. And I

0:20:19.840 --> 0:20:23.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, my dad's you know you ran a union

0:20:23.359 --> 0:20:26.359
<v Speaker 2>for thirty some years. It's kind of like an old

0:20:26.480 --> 0:20:29.879
<v Speaker 2>school type of guys. How he's always carried himself. And

0:20:29.960 --> 0:20:31.680
<v Speaker 2>it's not like he was like one of those dads

0:20:31.720 --> 0:20:34.280
<v Speaker 2>that like never said I love you. He every phone

0:20:34.320 --> 0:20:36.320
<v Speaker 2>call I've ever had with in my life, he ended

0:20:36.320 --> 0:20:39.359
<v Speaker 2>with I love you. He's not one of those dads

0:20:39.400 --> 0:20:42.639
<v Speaker 2>like didn't hug or anything like he the he wasn't.

0:20:42.840 --> 0:20:48.320
<v Speaker 2>He was a very affectionate guy. But since I've been

0:20:48.359 --> 0:20:53.639
<v Speaker 2>an adult, I don't know that we've had, you know,

0:20:54.040 --> 0:21:02.280
<v Speaker 2>five real like heart to heart, like how are you doing?

0:21:03.720 --> 0:21:08.720
<v Speaker 2>You know, I'm sorry for this thing I did twenty

0:21:08.840 --> 0:21:12.040
<v Speaker 2>years ago that might have hurt your feelings because it's

0:21:12.160 --> 0:21:17.280
<v Speaker 2>just not the kind of wavelength we've operated. And we

0:21:17.440 --> 0:21:24.640
<v Speaker 2>also probably haven't spent as much quality time together as

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:27.080
<v Speaker 2>either of us would like. But it's neither one of

0:21:27.119 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 2>us fault. Like he was trying to get me to

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:32.800
<v Speaker 2>go with him to this big Charlie's place for two years,

0:21:33.160 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 2>and every time, like it's tough Sunday football, I can't

0:21:37.280 --> 0:21:40.159
<v Speaker 2>like just be watching the Chiefs game. I don't want to,

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 2>you know, you know, And so so this weekend he

0:21:46.480 --> 0:21:51.040
<v Speaker 2>came over on Sunday and watched football with me, and

0:21:51.119 --> 0:21:55.520
<v Speaker 2>we sat and watched football and had a great time

0:21:56.640 --> 0:22:02.800
<v Speaker 2>for seven hours in almost silence. It's like, oh, good play,

0:22:03.200 --> 0:22:06.040
<v Speaker 2>like just sitting there and I really was enjoying it,

0:22:06.400 --> 0:22:09.399
<v Speaker 2>like I was really, I really was enjoying it. And

0:22:09.440 --> 0:22:12.720
<v Speaker 2>then to mom's ay, your mom came home and she

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:19.960
<v Speaker 2>sat with us for five minutes and just started talking

0:22:21.400 --> 0:22:26.879
<v Speaker 2>and intentionally brought up something that my dad and I

0:22:26.960 --> 0:22:30.199
<v Speaker 2>probably needed to talk about for oh, I don't know

0:22:30.760 --> 0:22:34.679
<v Speaker 2>ten years, but neither one of us has. And she

0:22:34.840 --> 0:22:38.040
<v Speaker 2>basically brought it up, walked out of the room and

0:22:38.160 --> 0:22:40.000
<v Speaker 2>then you know what I mean, and then was like,

0:22:40.320 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 2>you guys should talk like And it led to over

0:22:48.880 --> 0:23:00.440
<v Speaker 2>the last thirty six hours, probably four full hours of

0:23:01.560 --> 0:23:06.399
<v Speaker 2>conversations with my dad that yes, some of it was

0:23:06.440 --> 0:23:10.480
<v Speaker 2>like I apologized for you know, some things I did

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:12.879
<v Speaker 2>that I didn't know hurt his feelings, whatever it was.

0:23:12.920 --> 0:23:15.639
<v Speaker 2>But a lot of it was like I on the

0:23:15.720 --> 0:23:20.159
<v Speaker 2>drive to Philly just asked him questions about his life

0:23:20.200 --> 0:23:24.960
<v Speaker 2>before I was born that I didn't know about, and

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:31.359
<v Speaker 2>like about the early parts of his career, about you know,

0:23:31.480 --> 0:23:34.879
<v Speaker 2>the things that these things that I just didn't know about.

0:23:35.640 --> 0:23:38.679
<v Speaker 2>And it's like when you're a kid, you're too young

0:23:39.240 --> 0:23:42.720
<v Speaker 2>to ask or your parent wouldn't tell you. And then

0:23:43.000 --> 0:23:46.879
<v Speaker 2>when you're an adult and you're finally like on eye level,

0:23:47.040 --> 0:23:49.480
<v Speaker 2>all of a sudden, you're focused on your kids.

0:23:50.760 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 1>And I.

0:23:54.400 --> 0:23:57.119
<v Speaker 2>The whole drive to Philly, we talked, and then we

0:23:57.200 --> 0:24:02.159
<v Speaker 2>got to Philly and watched the game. And then after

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:07.120
<v Speaker 2>the the you know, despite the devastating loss, went back

0:24:07.119 --> 0:24:09.719
<v Speaker 2>to the hotel, sat outside the hotel and talked, and

0:24:09.800 --> 0:24:15.800
<v Speaker 2>then went to the hotel and sat and talked for

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:18.040
<v Speaker 2>another probably ninety minutes. For it was like two in

0:24:18.080 --> 0:24:20.879
<v Speaker 2>the morning and it was, you know, time to go

0:24:20.920 --> 0:24:27.119
<v Speaker 2>to bed. And so I'm telling this very vulnerable. You know,

0:24:28.480 --> 0:24:31.120
<v Speaker 2>potentially people are tuning in right now, they're like, oh, Nix,

0:24:31.119 --> 0:24:33.760
<v Speaker 2>I'm talking about the Chiefs loss, and I'm damn near crying.

0:24:34.200 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 2>I'm doing it for a reason, because it is we are.

0:24:41.560 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 2>Everyone right now that has family around alive hopefully is

0:24:47.080 --> 0:24:49.399
<v Speaker 2>going to be around some of them over the next

0:24:49.480 --> 0:24:58.080
<v Speaker 2>five six days. And it can be very easy to

0:24:58.320 --> 0:25:01.960
<v Speaker 2>just be like, ah, you know, we'll talk about that

0:25:01.960 --> 0:25:06.679
<v Speaker 2>another time, or ah, he knows I love, or he

0:25:06.840 --> 0:25:14.399
<v Speaker 2>knows I'm sorry about that. And I didn't know that.

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:19.440
<v Speaker 2>I didn't know so much about my dad's like actual

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 2>like history, like how he became who he is, which is,

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:27.720
<v Speaker 2>I believe one of the most important and successful people

0:25:27.720 --> 0:25:30.679
<v Speaker 2>in the history of Kansas City. What he's done for

0:25:30.720 --> 0:25:34.440
<v Speaker 2>the union membership there, for the people there, I think

0:25:34.480 --> 0:25:36.680
<v Speaker 2>it is. I mean, you'll have a street named after

0:25:36.760 --> 0:25:42.760
<v Speaker 2>him at one point and his road there, and like,

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:46.280
<v Speaker 2>there's this shit I should have known, like I didn't

0:25:46.280 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 2>demandse when my sister, when your aunt was a baby

0:25:50.920 --> 0:25:54.800
<v Speaker 2>for nine months, they all lived in Boston. I guess

0:25:54.840 --> 0:25:57.120
<v Speaker 2>I knew that, but I didn't know it was when

0:25:57.160 --> 0:26:01.560
<v Speaker 2>my dad was getting my dad was getting his masters

0:26:01.960 --> 0:26:05.520
<v Speaker 2>at Harvard and my mom had just had Joe and

0:26:05.560 --> 0:26:07.960
<v Speaker 2>they lived there. And I'm like, you, guys, Joe lived

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:11.359
<v Speaker 2>in Boston, And I guess I'm supposed to know these things.

0:26:11.400 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 2>It's my family, but I'm so caught up in my

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:15.760
<v Speaker 2>own did or whatever. And I'm like, so then you

0:26:15.840 --> 0:26:19.600
<v Speaker 2>did what? And then all these things And so the

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 2>long meandering path of this is twofold. One is to

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 2>maybe you know, uh, put well, I guess it's threefold.

0:26:33.520 --> 0:26:39.720
<v Speaker 2>One is, if you're thinking about you know, reconnecting or

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:43.280
<v Speaker 2>connecting on a deeper level with someone you truly love.

0:26:43.920 --> 0:26:48.200
<v Speaker 2>I cannot endorse it strongly enough because if your mom

0:26:48.240 --> 0:26:50.679
<v Speaker 2>had walked in, before she walked in that room, she

0:26:50.720 --> 0:26:52.720
<v Speaker 2>had said to me, I'm gonna bring this up, I

0:26:52.720 --> 0:26:55.000
<v Speaker 2>would have said, no, you are not. I do not

0:26:55.200 --> 0:27:00.560
<v Speaker 2>want to have these conversations. But I did evidently, So

0:27:00.680 --> 0:27:04.240
<v Speaker 2>that's the first reason. The second reason is because this

0:27:04.359 --> 0:27:10.600
<v Speaker 2>is such a unique dynamic and I see so the

0:27:10.640 --> 0:27:15.800
<v Speaker 2>me and Demanse and so much of as young men

0:27:17.000 --> 0:27:22.280
<v Speaker 2>into men, we are pushing and pulling against like who

0:27:22.320 --> 0:27:26.160
<v Speaker 2>are fathers are, who they wanted to be, who they

0:27:26.480 --> 0:27:29.359
<v Speaker 2>you know, who they whatever it is, and it really

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:34.080
<v Speaker 2>does form a lot of who then we are. And

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:43.600
<v Speaker 2>I I always worry that my you know that, how

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:47.760
<v Speaker 2>how rarely I have, like, you know, deep real conversations

0:27:47.800 --> 0:27:52.000
<v Speaker 2>with my dad, Like I was thinking about it, like

0:27:52.040 --> 0:27:56.040
<v Speaker 2>I was like, man, when I'm his age, if that's

0:27:56.160 --> 0:28:00.800
<v Speaker 2>me and Demanse all be super sad, with which within

0:28:00.960 --> 0:28:04.119
<v Speaker 2>means my dad was probably sad about it, but I

0:28:04.240 --> 0:28:07.560
<v Speaker 2>was just focused on my own stuff. And so I

0:28:07.560 --> 0:28:09.480
<v Speaker 2>don't know if that makes sense, But like I'm not

0:28:09.560 --> 0:28:16.040
<v Speaker 2>always the best example on these interfamiliar relationships and so like,

0:28:16.119 --> 0:28:20.359
<v Speaker 2>it was really an important, important forty eight hours of

0:28:20.400 --> 0:28:23.040
<v Speaker 2>my life these last two days, like truly, and I

0:28:23.080 --> 0:28:25.120
<v Speaker 2>didn't know what would be. It was just like, oh cool,

0:28:25.160 --> 0:28:28.359
<v Speaker 2>my dad's coming to down, get to see him, and

0:28:29.119 --> 0:28:32.720
<v Speaker 2>so I said, I said threefold. And the third reason

0:28:33.520 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 2>is because instead of having to spend twenty minutes talking

0:28:37.600 --> 0:28:39.600
<v Speaker 2>about that chief's loss, I only had to spend ten

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:41.080
<v Speaker 2>and no one could be mad at me about it.

0:28:41.120 --> 0:28:44.200
<v Speaker 2>Now check made everybody quick break right back? What's right?

0:28:50.600 --> 0:28:52.920
<v Speaker 2>All right? Welcome back What's Right with Nick Wright? Episode

0:28:52.960 --> 0:28:55.200
<v Speaker 2>one ninety five. This episode of What's Right is brought

0:28:55.200 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 2>to you by the McDonald's app. I love the McDonald's

0:28:58.600 --> 0:29:00.800
<v Speaker 2>app for mick Delivery. I love it because it's perfect

0:29:00.840 --> 0:29:03.360
<v Speaker 2>for any situation. Pouring rain, don't want to go out

0:29:03.400 --> 0:29:06.840
<v Speaker 2>and get your delicious mcdouble boom McDelivery, your team's playing,

0:29:06.840 --> 0:29:09.000
<v Speaker 2>you don't want to miss a single second mc delivery.

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:11.000
<v Speaker 2>Say it's been a long day, What better way to

0:29:11.040 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 2>fix it than getting a delicious quarter pounder with cheese

0:29:13.840 --> 0:29:16.280
<v Speaker 2>and a large fry delivered right to your door. I

0:29:16.320 --> 0:29:19.200
<v Speaker 2>personally love to order McDelivery when I'm watching a game

0:29:19.280 --> 0:29:22.040
<v Speaker 2>or spending time with my family. And now every time

0:29:22.080 --> 0:29:24.200
<v Speaker 2>you order McDelivery in the McDonald's app, it earns you

0:29:24.320 --> 0:29:27.400
<v Speaker 2>points towards free food. And who doesn't like free food?

0:29:27.440 --> 0:29:31.040
<v Speaker 2>So there's always a reason to order in the McDonald's app.

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:33.560
<v Speaker 2>Download the McDonald's app today at participate in McDonald's delivery.

0:29:33.560 --> 0:29:35.600
<v Speaker 2>Prices may be higher than at restaurant's delivery, and other

0:29:35.640 --> 0:29:40.160
<v Speaker 2>fees may apply. Copyright twenty twenty three McDonald's. All right,

0:29:40.200 --> 0:29:45.080
<v Speaker 2>demon's before we get to the other NFL topics, you

0:29:45.160 --> 0:29:47.719
<v Speaker 2>have a major announcement to make. Go ahead.

0:29:48.600 --> 0:29:53.120
<v Speaker 3>I had my teaser this week, but it's not really

0:29:53.640 --> 0:29:55.840
<v Speaker 3>I kind of knew this teaser was gonna hit. This

0:29:55.960 --> 0:29:59.160
<v Speaker 3>was Oh Dells was looking great from the start. Oh

0:29:59.160 --> 0:30:02.240
<v Speaker 3>we're doing this because gambling show on Thursday. Yeah, Detroit

0:30:02.400 --> 0:30:04.240
<v Speaker 3>took Oh.

0:30:05.360 --> 0:30:09.720
<v Speaker 2>Don't say, and don't say you knew it would hit.

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:15.440
<v Speaker 2>It took a historic comeback by Detroit for you to

0:30:15.880 --> 0:30:20.480
<v Speaker 2>esay by the hair of your chin, they I mean

0:30:21.080 --> 0:30:24.760
<v Speaker 2>the idea that like, oh, throw my feet up theirs

0:30:24.920 --> 0:30:28.120
<v Speaker 2>was never a doubt. It was in major doubt. Now

0:30:28.200 --> 0:30:31.240
<v Speaker 2>it hit, and I'm happy. But this wasn't like a

0:30:31.320 --> 0:30:35.760
<v Speaker 2>smooth sailing teezer where you didn't have to worry.

0:30:35.800 --> 0:30:38.239
<v Speaker 3>At any point in that Bears game. Did you think

0:30:38.320 --> 0:30:40.000
<v Speaker 3>that they were going to beat the Lions?

0:30:41.160 --> 0:30:43.440
<v Speaker 2>Well, when they had a twelve point lead with five

0:30:43.560 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 2>minutes left, I thought it was possible. Yeah, I mean,

0:30:46.960 --> 0:30:52.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean when Jared goff through his third interception and

0:30:52.600 --> 0:30:55.600
<v Speaker 2>they were already down nine, I was a little nervous

0:30:55.640 --> 0:30:59.840
<v Speaker 2>for you. And I buy by the way, I had

0:30:59.840 --> 0:31:03.960
<v Speaker 2>the Lions in a teaser, so I I was sweating

0:31:03.960 --> 0:31:06.920
<v Speaker 2>it right there alongside you.

0:31:07.840 --> 0:31:09.440
<v Speaker 3>Was it a seven and a half point teaser?

0:31:10.320 --> 0:31:13.040
<v Speaker 2>No, So I had the Lions just six point teaser,

0:31:13.120 --> 0:31:15.000
<v Speaker 2>down to just a point and a half, so I

0:31:15.120 --> 0:31:18.200
<v Speaker 2>really needed that two point convert. They scored touchdown to

0:31:18.200 --> 0:31:20.160
<v Speaker 2>go up one, and they went for two and they

0:31:20.200 --> 0:31:22.960
<v Speaker 2>got it. Now they ended up I guess not needing

0:31:22.960 --> 0:31:24.760
<v Speaker 2>it because they got the safety at the end because

0:31:24.800 --> 0:31:27.480
<v Speaker 2>Field's fumbled. But yeah, I mean I was sweating it

0:31:27.520 --> 0:31:30.840
<v Speaker 2>out longer than you. But congrats Demonse, Like it says

0:31:30.920 --> 0:31:32.960
<v Speaker 2>undefeated since week eleven.

0:31:33.040 --> 0:31:36.360
<v Speaker 3>And we will wait, ye, So, I mean, we don't

0:31:36.360 --> 0:31:38.240
<v Speaker 3>have a gambling show this week. So what I'll do

0:31:38.320 --> 0:31:41.360
<v Speaker 3>for you guys is I'll compile a teaser and I'll

0:31:41.400 --> 0:31:43.280
<v Speaker 3>get us some money this Thanksgiving and I'll post it

0:31:43.320 --> 0:31:45.160
<v Speaker 3>to my Twitter. You guys can trail me.

0:31:46.160 --> 0:31:49.120
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so that's yes. Follow Demond on Twitter at demonse

0:31:49.240 --> 0:31:53.920
<v Speaker 2>bird Byrd. Also, I will do my five picks as

0:31:53.960 --> 0:31:56.600
<v Speaker 2>I always do, and we'll post it to the What's

0:31:56.680 --> 0:31:59.040
<v Speaker 2>Right account. We'll also post Amonti's teaser to the What's

0:31:59.120 --> 0:32:04.000
<v Speaker 2>Right account us for record keeping purposes, because we need

0:32:04.040 --> 0:32:06.920
<v Speaker 2>to have the record stay as it is or not.

0:32:07.040 --> 0:32:08.800
<v Speaker 2>I shouldn't say stay as is, but we need to

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:12.600
<v Speaker 2>do whatever. Single weekend, let's get let's get to the game,

0:32:12.720 --> 0:32:15.120
<v Speaker 2>or let's get to the other stories, all right.

0:32:15.160 --> 0:32:17.520
<v Speaker 3>Per usual, there's a lot of talk of who should

0:32:17.560 --> 0:32:20.480
<v Speaker 3>get MVP. A lot of names make sense, but a

0:32:20.600 --> 0:32:22.560
<v Speaker 3>name that might not make sense to you that makes

0:32:22.600 --> 0:32:25.440
<v Speaker 3>a lot of sense to others is Rock Party. So

0:32:25.480 --> 0:32:27.920
<v Speaker 3>he threw for a perfect passer rating in his last

0:32:27.920 --> 0:32:32.440
<v Speaker 3>game and sits the top. He's got the fifth best

0:32:32.440 --> 0:32:36.840
<v Speaker 3>odds to win MVP right now, So do you think

0:32:36.920 --> 0:32:38.880
<v Speaker 3>do you think that's a safe bet? Is it rational

0:32:38.960 --> 0:32:42.360
<v Speaker 3>for Rock Perrie to get MVP or is that bar fetched?

0:32:42.400 --> 0:32:44.240
<v Speaker 3>I mean perfect passer rating, it's crazy.

0:32:44.560 --> 0:32:49.600
<v Speaker 2>I just can't believe we're gonna We're literally just going

0:32:49.640 --> 0:32:55.200
<v Speaker 2>to do the exact same lunatic conversation we had after

0:32:55.240 --> 0:33:02.480
<v Speaker 2>the Cowboys game again. So here's the thing. Can brock

0:33:02.520 --> 0:33:05.000
<v Speaker 2>Purty be the MVP of the entire league when he

0:33:05.120 --> 0:33:07.440
<v Speaker 2>is not the MVP of his own team? Of course not.

0:33:07.880 --> 0:33:10.480
<v Speaker 2>So let's just take that away. What about if we

0:33:10.640 --> 0:33:12.680
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't hold it against him? If a team has a

0:33:12.680 --> 0:33:15.520
<v Speaker 2>great defensive player, they don't win MVP. Okay, is brock

0:33:15.560 --> 0:33:19.720
<v Speaker 2>perty the most valuable player on the Niners offense? Of course?

0:33:19.760 --> 0:33:22.480
<v Speaker 2>Not that's Christian McCaffrey. Is he the best player? Of course,

0:33:22.520 --> 0:33:25.640
<v Speaker 2>not that's Trent Williams. Like, let's all stop, just stop.

0:33:26.240 --> 0:33:31.440
<v Speaker 2>But here's the thing people want me, And this was

0:33:31.520 --> 0:33:35.680
<v Speaker 2>the conversation on first things first, Like Nick, time to

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:41.960
<v Speaker 2>admit you were wrong about party guys. I use this

0:33:42.080 --> 0:33:44.440
<v Speaker 2>analogy on the show and I will use it again.

0:33:45.200 --> 0:33:51.840
<v Speaker 2>It demands you bought recently a very nice but sensible car.

0:33:52.400 --> 0:33:56.320
<v Speaker 2>It works in all environments. Let's just let's say you

0:33:56.480 --> 0:34:00.920
<v Speaker 2>hit fifty teasers in a row and you were just

0:34:01.120 --> 0:34:05.720
<v Speaker 2>rolling in it and you were like, hey, uh, I'm

0:34:05.760 --> 0:34:11.840
<v Speaker 2>getting a brand new sports car rear will drive convertible.

0:34:12.080 --> 0:34:15.600
<v Speaker 2>It's awesome, gonna have so much fun driving it. Also,

0:34:15.840 --> 0:34:20.440
<v Speaker 2>as it happens, Fox is transferring me to New York,

0:34:20.920 --> 0:34:23.400
<v Speaker 2>and I'm gonna move from LA to New York and

0:34:23.400 --> 0:34:27.440
<v Speaker 2>I'm gonna drive in my sports car. And I'm like, okay, buddy,

0:34:27.880 --> 0:34:30.200
<v Speaker 2>that car's a ton of fun and you're gonna look

0:34:30.200 --> 0:34:33.920
<v Speaker 2>great in it. And when the sun shining and the

0:34:33.960 --> 0:34:37.479
<v Speaker 2>wind's blowing, it might look like the coolest car out there.

0:34:37.719 --> 0:34:41.279
<v Speaker 2>But I gotta tell you, I've read that in the

0:34:41.400 --> 0:34:47.120
<v Speaker 2>rain that car does terribly, and in the snow it's

0:34:47.160 --> 0:34:51.480
<v Speaker 2>almost undrivable. And you're like, nope, don't care, think you're wrong,

0:34:51.800 --> 0:34:56.200
<v Speaker 2>Gonna be great, and you drive and it's going great,

0:34:56.640 --> 0:34:59.680
<v Speaker 2>and then the first time it rains you slide off

0:34:59.680 --> 0:35:03.120
<v Speaker 2>the road. You're like, well, hopefully that's just an oddity.

0:35:03.680 --> 0:35:06.440
<v Speaker 2>And then it snows and you can't get it out

0:35:06.480 --> 0:35:09.560
<v Speaker 2>of your driveway, and then it rains and snows at

0:35:09.560 --> 0:35:13.120
<v Speaker 2>the same time, and you wreck it and you take

0:35:13.239 --> 0:35:17.480
<v Speaker 2>the shop get it fixed up, and then its sunshine

0:35:17.520 --> 0:35:20.279
<v Speaker 2>again and you're driving and you call me. You're like, hey,

0:35:20.960 --> 0:35:23.919
<v Speaker 2>ready to admit you were wrong about this car? Look

0:35:23.960 --> 0:35:25.120
<v Speaker 2>at how awesome it is.

0:35:25.600 --> 0:35:26.759
<v Speaker 3>No, I won't be.

0:35:27.360 --> 0:35:31.480
<v Speaker 2>And the point is with Purdy, I had two questions,

0:35:32.040 --> 0:35:35.359
<v Speaker 2>how will he look when all of the Avengers aren't there?

0:35:36.280 --> 0:35:39.360
<v Speaker 2>How will he look if he has to come from behind?

0:35:39.800 --> 0:35:42.719
<v Speaker 2>And God forbid? How would he look in all if that?

0:35:42.880 --> 0:35:46.919
<v Speaker 2>Both those things happened together, and we saw it rain,

0:35:47.400 --> 0:35:52.120
<v Speaker 2>we saw not all the Avengers were there against the Browns,

0:35:52.680 --> 0:35:55.839
<v Speaker 2>and then we saw him it have to come from

0:35:55.840 --> 0:35:59.160
<v Speaker 2>behind against the Vikings. Then we saw him have to

0:35:59.200 --> 0:36:02.120
<v Speaker 2>come from behind and not have all the Avengers there

0:36:02.360 --> 0:36:06.000
<v Speaker 2>against the Bengals, And how did it look? So it

0:36:07.400 --> 0:36:11.000
<v Speaker 2>is not a question of does brock Purty stink? Clearly

0:36:11.080 --> 0:36:15.920
<v Speaker 2>he does not. It is a question of to me

0:36:16.000 --> 0:36:20.040
<v Speaker 2>it's twofold one is you know he played Baker Mayfield

0:36:20.160 --> 0:36:22.959
<v Speaker 2>yesterday or Sunday? I made this point before the game.

0:36:23.000 --> 0:36:26.200
<v Speaker 2>I still believe it would the San Francisco forty nine

0:36:26.320 --> 0:36:30.160
<v Speaker 2>ers be better, worse of the same if Baker was

0:36:30.160 --> 0:36:33.400
<v Speaker 2>the quarterback instead of Party. I'm very confident they wouldn't

0:36:33.440 --> 0:36:37.120
<v Speaker 2>be worse. Maybe they wouldn't be better. I think they'd

0:36:37.120 --> 0:36:40.800
<v Speaker 2>be a touch better, but they certainly could do. Baker

0:36:40.840 --> 0:36:43.840
<v Speaker 2>can do everything perty's doing. That's the first, that's the

0:36:44.160 --> 0:36:47.960
<v Speaker 2>I vehemently believe that, I think most people do. And

0:36:48.000 --> 0:36:52.600
<v Speaker 2>then the next question is if in the postseason they

0:36:52.600 --> 0:36:56.319
<v Speaker 2>are in a position anything similar to either of the

0:36:56.360 --> 0:37:01.400
<v Speaker 2>circumstances they faced in the three game losing streak, can

0:37:01.520 --> 0:37:05.640
<v Speaker 2>Purty pull him out of it. I don't believe he can.

0:37:05.800 --> 0:37:08.160
<v Speaker 2>Well see if he proves me wrong. But the fact

0:37:08.160 --> 0:37:10.680
<v Speaker 2>that it's a question means two things. One is he

0:37:10.719 --> 0:37:14.680
<v Speaker 2>can't be the league MVP, and the other the other

0:37:14.800 --> 0:37:19.080
<v Speaker 2>part of it is if we want to do the Hey,

0:37:19.960 --> 0:37:24.080
<v Speaker 2>it's a weird year, let's give MVP to a guy

0:37:24.120 --> 0:37:29.280
<v Speaker 2>with great numbers. But that's also an amazing story. CJ

0:37:29.480 --> 0:37:33.520
<v Speaker 2>Stroud is sitting right there. I'm sorry. The Texans have

0:37:33.640 --> 0:37:36.680
<v Speaker 2>six wins and the Niners have seven. CJ is putting

0:37:36.760 --> 0:37:40.840
<v Speaker 2>up almost as good of numbers without any all pros

0:37:40.880 --> 0:37:43.399
<v Speaker 2>on his team, with a rookie coach on a team

0:37:43.440 --> 0:37:46.680
<v Speaker 2>everyone thought it was gonna be terrible. Like, I don't

0:37:46.680 --> 0:37:49.279
<v Speaker 2>think CJ is the MVP either, But if we want

0:37:49.280 --> 0:37:52.320
<v Speaker 2>to do a quarterback who's putting up bonkers numbers in

0:37:52.360 --> 0:37:56.319
<v Speaker 2>the Shanahan system, that's a great story. Perty's not even

0:37:56.320 --> 0:37:59.120
<v Speaker 2>the best option of that so I just can't do

0:37:59.320 --> 0:38:04.920
<v Speaker 2>I can't ever, I can't keep having is a guy

0:38:05.120 --> 0:38:07.160
<v Speaker 2>who no one thinks is one of the five best

0:38:07.160 --> 0:38:09.680
<v Speaker 2>players on his own team gonna be the league MVP.

0:38:09.800 --> 0:38:11.160
<v Speaker 2>And this is the last thing I'll say on it.

0:38:11.400 --> 0:38:13.960
<v Speaker 2>Because Coach Mangini got mad at me. I don't know

0:38:13.960 --> 0:38:15.480
<v Speaker 2>if was coach got mad at me. Someone got mad

0:38:15.480 --> 0:38:18.799
<v Speaker 2>at me yesterday and they were like, you have to

0:38:18.880 --> 0:38:22.920
<v Speaker 2>stop discounting him. You can say a lot of my

0:38:23.040 --> 0:38:28.640
<v Speaker 2>commentary has discounted him, that's fine, But saying a guy

0:38:29.719 --> 0:38:35.080
<v Speaker 2>should not win the single most prestigious award the NFL

0:38:35.160 --> 0:38:38.759
<v Speaker 2>has to offer is not a slight saying a guy,

0:38:38.920 --> 0:38:41.759
<v Speaker 2>you know what, I don't think this guy is the

0:38:41.840 --> 0:38:46.160
<v Speaker 2>league MVP. Is not hating on him, is not taking

0:38:46.200 --> 0:38:50.600
<v Speaker 2>a shot at him. It's simply saying he shouldn't get

0:38:50.800 --> 0:38:55.960
<v Speaker 2>an award that the last four years five years has

0:38:56.040 --> 0:39:00.440
<v Speaker 2>gone to only Patrick Mahomes, Aaron Rodgers, and Lamar j accent.

0:39:00.840 --> 0:39:01.680
<v Speaker 2>That's what it's saying.

0:39:01.719 --> 0:39:06.719
<v Speaker 3>All right, go ahead, Sorry, yeah, so wait, are we

0:39:06.840 --> 0:39:08.279
<v Speaker 3>on to the next topic? Because you want me to

0:39:08.320 --> 0:39:08.640
<v Speaker 3>weigh on.

0:39:10.840 --> 0:39:12.360
<v Speaker 2>You can weigh in on. You can weigh in on

0:39:12.400 --> 0:39:13.640
<v Speaker 2>brock Party and then we can move on.

0:39:14.200 --> 0:39:16.160
<v Speaker 3>It's all about what he's doing. Man, where's he going

0:39:16.239 --> 0:39:19.200
<v Speaker 3>to take the team. And if he can, you know,

0:39:19.600 --> 0:39:22.640
<v Speaker 3>play to Shanahan system and get them to the postseason

0:39:22.840 --> 0:39:25.680
<v Speaker 3>that first seed or second seed, then believe that he

0:39:25.760 --> 0:39:28.359
<v Speaker 3>deserves to be in the talks, even if it's the

0:39:28.400 --> 0:39:30.960
<v Speaker 3>system that he's playing. Like I believe that you should

0:39:31.480 --> 0:39:35.120
<v Speaker 3>have a system for a specific quarterback, like whatever this

0:39:35.200 --> 0:39:37.920
<v Speaker 3>system is, we're going to play to your your ability.

0:39:38.640 --> 0:39:42.040
<v Speaker 2>And I agree with all of that. I agree with that,

0:39:42.520 --> 0:39:46.440
<v Speaker 2>but that doesn't mean that anyone should have to should

0:39:46.520 --> 0:39:49.080
<v Speaker 2>look into a camera and be like, I think he's

0:39:49.160 --> 0:39:52.640
<v Speaker 2>more valuable, like either definition that you want to do.

0:39:52.760 --> 0:39:55.640
<v Speaker 2>If you want MVP to be at the value proposition

0:39:55.680 --> 0:39:58.200
<v Speaker 2>doesn't matter, it's who's the best or if you're like

0:39:58.280 --> 0:40:00.640
<v Speaker 2>the values in the name for a reason. If someone

0:40:00.680 --> 0:40:02.760
<v Speaker 2>want to look into the camera and say brock Purty

0:40:02.840 --> 0:40:05.359
<v Speaker 2>is more valuable than Lamar Jackson, someone want to look

0:40:05.360 --> 0:40:07.239
<v Speaker 2>in the camera and say brock Purty is better than

0:40:07.280 --> 0:40:09.720
<v Speaker 2>Lamar Jackson. Does someone want to look into the camera

0:40:09.800 --> 0:40:12.359
<v Speaker 2>and say brock Purty is more valuable or better than

0:40:12.400 --> 0:40:16.279
<v Speaker 2>Dak Prescott or Jalen Hurts or pick any I'm not

0:40:16.280 --> 0:40:19.280
<v Speaker 2>even gonna say Mahomes because Mahomes isn't having his standard

0:40:19.320 --> 0:40:22.920
<v Speaker 2>of season. Nobody thinks it. So if he's not more

0:40:23.000 --> 0:40:25.200
<v Speaker 2>valuable to his team than those guys, and he's not

0:40:25.320 --> 0:40:28.080
<v Speaker 2>better than those guys, why would he win the award?

0:40:28.640 --> 0:40:34.600
<v Speaker 2>It's lunacy and everyone. What I can't believe is people

0:40:34.680 --> 0:40:39.560
<v Speaker 2>are trying to credibly have within three weeks of each other,

0:40:40.719 --> 0:40:44.360
<v Speaker 2>the same convert. The same people who were entertaining the

0:40:44.440 --> 0:40:49.120
<v Speaker 2>idea he could be benched for Sam Darnold two weeks

0:40:49.160 --> 0:40:52.160
<v Speaker 2>ago are now saying, Eh, you know what, Actually, maybe

0:40:52.200 --> 0:40:54.239
<v Speaker 2>he's the Vay of the league. Give me, give me

0:40:54.280 --> 0:40:57.319
<v Speaker 2>a break, Give me a break, all right, next, all right?

0:40:57.360 --> 0:41:00.520
<v Speaker 3>The Cowboys are zero to two against winning teams with

0:41:00.560 --> 0:41:03.120
<v Speaker 3>a winning record. They have this thing or this mo

0:41:03.360 --> 0:41:05.880
<v Speaker 3>to just beat up on the sorry teams. Five of

0:41:05.880 --> 0:41:12.239
<v Speaker 3>their seven remaining games include Seattle, Philadelphia, Buffalo, Miami and Detroit.

0:41:12.719 --> 0:41:14.960
<v Speaker 3>Commanders are probably the only team left on the schedule

0:41:14.960 --> 0:41:18.160
<v Speaker 3>that they're gonna be able to easily bully, So with

0:41:18.239 --> 0:41:20.319
<v Speaker 3>them losing any of these games, there's a chance that

0:41:20.360 --> 0:41:22.919
<v Speaker 3>they could play their achilles heel in the forty nine Ers.

0:41:23.600 --> 0:41:26.280
<v Speaker 3>Is your confidence in Dallas, making the Super Bowl weathering

0:41:26.320 --> 0:41:26.880
<v Speaker 3>away with that.

0:41:28.040 --> 0:41:32.759
<v Speaker 2>No. So here's the thing. Obviously, Phillies win last night

0:41:33.280 --> 0:41:37.600
<v Speaker 2>makes Dallas winning the division far more difficult. Now. I

0:41:37.640 --> 0:41:41.520
<v Speaker 2>think Dallas is gonna beat Washington and then beat Seattle

0:41:41.600 --> 0:41:46.239
<v Speaker 2>and then play Philadelphia on Sunday Night football, sitting at

0:41:46.320 --> 0:41:48.520
<v Speaker 2>nine to three. But even if they were to win

0:41:48.640 --> 0:41:52.560
<v Speaker 2>that game, they need Philly to really tailspin in order

0:41:52.600 --> 0:41:56.759
<v Speaker 2>to win that division. But at the five seed, they're

0:41:56.800 --> 0:41:59.560
<v Speaker 2>not gonna play San Francisco in round one. They're not

0:41:59.560 --> 0:42:02.920
<v Speaker 2>gonna play Detroit. In round one. The five seed plays

0:42:03.719 --> 0:42:10.000
<v Speaker 2>the lowest ranking division winner, which is a lockstop guarantee

0:42:10.600 --> 0:42:13.359
<v Speaker 2>to be the NFC South winner, like it was last

0:42:13.440 --> 0:42:16.279
<v Speaker 2>year when Dallas went to Tampa and won. So do

0:42:16.360 --> 0:42:21.000
<v Speaker 2>I think Dallas can go to Tampa and beat or

0:42:21.040 --> 0:42:22.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm sorry, go to Tampa, or go to New Orleans

0:42:22.960 --> 0:42:26.360
<v Speaker 2>or go to Atlanta. Of course, the question then for

0:42:26.560 --> 0:42:29.560
<v Speaker 2>Dallas is who do they play in the next round?

0:42:29.680 --> 0:42:32.360
<v Speaker 2>Because I think Dallas can beat Philly. I think Dallas

0:42:32.400 --> 0:42:35.239
<v Speaker 2>will beat Philly when they play in Dallas in a

0:42:35.239 --> 0:42:37.800
<v Speaker 2>few weeks. I mean Dallas moves the ball well on Philly,

0:42:38.000 --> 0:42:40.440
<v Speaker 2>the team they have not been able to beat is

0:42:40.520 --> 0:42:46.080
<v Speaker 2>San Francisco. So Dallas probably what they need is someone

0:42:46.120 --> 0:42:49.759
<v Speaker 2>else to beat San Francisco for them. But I'll tell

0:42:49.760 --> 0:42:56.960
<v Speaker 2>you this much. I I think the Lions offense if

0:42:57.040 --> 0:43:01.040
<v Speaker 2>it's in Detroit can I think they absolutely could beat

0:43:01.040 --> 0:43:06.200
<v Speaker 2>San Francisco. I try the Lions in Detroit with the

0:43:06.200 --> 0:43:08.960
<v Speaker 2>way that offense hums. And the Lions, by the way,

0:43:09.040 --> 0:43:11.960
<v Speaker 2>you guys know again this was hurt by the Eagles

0:43:12.000 --> 0:43:14.920
<v Speaker 2>winning last night. They're very alive for the one seed,

0:43:15.440 --> 0:43:20.560
<v Speaker 2>and so here is Dallas's perfect world. Dallas's perfect world

0:43:20.680 --> 0:43:26.759
<v Speaker 2>is the following is that they the perfect world that

0:43:26.840 --> 0:43:30.680
<v Speaker 2>doesn't involve any like any of the Niners or Eagles,

0:43:30.680 --> 0:43:33.040
<v Speaker 2>any of those teams losing in Round one of the

0:43:33.080 --> 0:43:36.120
<v Speaker 2>playoffs in a huge upset like Minnesota beats them or something.

0:43:36.320 --> 0:43:40.600
<v Speaker 2>They're perfect world where they if they have to be

0:43:40.640 --> 0:43:43.359
<v Speaker 2>the wild card, is there the five seed, which they

0:43:43.400 --> 0:43:46.440
<v Speaker 2>will be, and they beat up on whoever the NFC

0:43:46.480 --> 0:43:53.440
<v Speaker 2>South team is, and then the one seed is Philadelphia,

0:43:54.200 --> 0:43:56.960
<v Speaker 2>with the two seed being Detroit and the three seed

0:43:57.000 --> 0:44:01.200
<v Speaker 2>being San Francisco. And they go to Philly where they

0:44:01.320 --> 0:44:04.760
<v Speaker 2>damn near one last time and beat them, and Detroit

0:44:04.800 --> 0:44:07.400
<v Speaker 2>beat San Francisco and Dallas then has to be Detroit

0:44:07.600 --> 0:44:10.360
<v Speaker 2>or the flip side of that, Detroit's the one, Philly's

0:44:10.400 --> 0:44:15.360
<v Speaker 2>the two, and Philly beat San Francisco. I think Dallas

0:44:15.400 --> 0:44:18.120
<v Speaker 2>is a really good team, but I can't deny the

0:44:18.160 --> 0:44:22.640
<v Speaker 2>evidence that they have a ton of problems just even

0:44:22.760 --> 0:44:26.080
<v Speaker 2>moving the ball at all on San Francisco. So in

0:44:26.200 --> 0:44:27.759
<v Speaker 2>order for them to go to the Super Bowl, someone

0:44:27.800 --> 0:44:30.560
<v Speaker 2>else might have to beat the Niners. But I think

0:44:30.719 --> 0:44:33.560
<v Speaker 2>there are a lot of teams that can beat the Niners,

0:44:33.600 --> 0:44:36.240
<v Speaker 2>particularly if they're not at full strength. And the Niners,

0:44:36.280 --> 0:44:38.680
<v Speaker 2>because of the physical brand of football they play, it's

0:44:38.760 --> 0:44:40.400
<v Speaker 2>very hard for them to get through the whole season

0:44:40.400 --> 0:44:43.160
<v Speaker 2>full strength. So that's where I'm at. Do I right

0:44:43.200 --> 0:44:45.440
<v Speaker 2>now think Dallas is the best team in the conference? No,

0:44:45.640 --> 0:44:48.920
<v Speaker 2>Philly is, Like Philly has earned that. Am I gonna

0:44:48.960 --> 0:44:51.719
<v Speaker 2>change my Super Bowl pick? Of course not. But right now,

0:44:51.719 --> 0:44:54.319
<v Speaker 2>if you were to be, like, hey, even money on

0:44:54.440 --> 0:44:57.360
<v Speaker 2>any team, Philly would be the smart bet. They've lost.

0:44:57.680 --> 0:45:00.720
<v Speaker 2>They've lost once, and they while they haven't looked amazing,

0:45:00.800 --> 0:45:04.520
<v Speaker 2>they know how to win games. Go ahead, all.

0:45:04.480 --> 0:45:06.840
<v Speaker 3>Right, We're on to the next one. All the worst

0:45:06.880 --> 0:45:09.359
<v Speaker 3>teams in the NFL. All, I mean, all the worst

0:45:09.360 --> 0:45:12.040
<v Speaker 3>teams in the NFL have quarterbacks, with the exception of

0:45:12.080 --> 0:45:15.759
<v Speaker 3>one team and the Patriots. Earlier this season there was

0:45:15.800 --> 0:45:19.080
<v Speaker 3>talks to Belichick leaving. Do you think if the Patriots

0:45:19.080 --> 0:45:21.720
<v Speaker 3>have a chance to get Caleb Williams that Bill Belichick

0:45:21.760 --> 0:45:22.200
<v Speaker 3>will stay?

0:45:24.600 --> 0:45:27.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, I don't think he's gonna have the opportunity, right,

0:45:28.000 --> 0:45:30.239
<v Speaker 2>I mean, just flat weight, I just don't think Belichick

0:45:30.360 --> 0:45:34.400
<v Speaker 2>is gonna have the opportunity to stay. And I think

0:45:34.440 --> 0:45:37.600
<v Speaker 2>that they the Patriots, if they.

0:45:37.600 --> 0:45:39.880
<v Speaker 3>Will want to blow it up and like a new quarterback,

0:45:39.960 --> 0:45:41.719
<v Speaker 3>new coach, like whole new pair, right.

0:45:41.719 --> 0:45:44.479
<v Speaker 2>Yes, and have an offensive mind. If you're gonna take

0:45:44.520 --> 0:45:47.280
<v Speaker 2>a quarterback number one, I think you'd want an offensive mind.

0:45:47.600 --> 0:45:53.759
<v Speaker 2>The problem with a defensive coach if you have the

0:45:54.080 --> 0:45:59.240
<v Speaker 2>potential superstar quarterback is he's going to perpetually be having

0:45:59.320 --> 0:46:06.840
<v Speaker 2>to chain coordinators because if you have a so this

0:46:07.080 --> 0:46:11.120
<v Speaker 2>is two like this is one of the downs. So

0:46:11.280 --> 0:46:14.799
<v Speaker 2>let's take Josh Allen as a for instance. Right, So

0:46:14.960 --> 0:46:20.200
<v Speaker 2>Josh Allen gets to Buffalo, he hasn't developed. They have

0:46:20.200 --> 0:46:23.319
<v Speaker 2>a defensive coach of McDermott. He hasn't developed quite the

0:46:23.320 --> 0:46:26.120
<v Speaker 2>way they would want, so he changes coordinators. They bring

0:46:26.160 --> 0:46:28.799
<v Speaker 2>in Brian Dabele, so Alan has to kind of learn

0:46:28.840 --> 0:46:32.200
<v Speaker 2>a new system whatever it is. Dabele is great, Alan

0:46:32.280 --> 0:46:34.480
<v Speaker 2>has the best years of his career. Well guess what.

0:46:35.000 --> 0:46:39.000
<v Speaker 2>Guess what happens to great offensive coordinators. They become head coaches.

0:46:39.320 --> 0:46:42.120
<v Speaker 2>So now Alan has to get a new offensive coordinator,

0:46:42.200 --> 0:46:46.400
<v Speaker 2>Ken Dorsey. Ken Dorsey, if he last year, people before

0:46:46.440 --> 0:46:48.440
<v Speaker 2>the Bills fell apart of the very end, people were like, oh,

0:46:48.640 --> 0:46:52.400
<v Speaker 2>Dorsey could be the next head coach somewhere. Instead it

0:46:52.440 --> 0:46:54.680
<v Speaker 2>went the other way. He got fired. Now he's with

0:46:55.080 --> 0:46:58.640
<v Speaker 2>Joe Brady that if you have a defensive coach, your

0:46:58.719 --> 0:47:01.440
<v Speaker 2>quarterbacks always going to be having to deal with a

0:47:01.480 --> 0:47:04.720
<v Speaker 2>new coordinator for either good or bad reasons. Good because

0:47:04.719 --> 0:47:07.000
<v Speaker 2>you do so well, he gets a head coaching job.

0:47:07.640 --> 0:47:11.040
<v Speaker 2>So the flip side is, if you have an offensive

0:47:11.080 --> 0:47:15.440
<v Speaker 2>coach like Red or Sirianni, yes, your coordinators might change,

0:47:15.480 --> 0:47:19.080
<v Speaker 2>but it's the coach that really is pressing the buttons

0:47:19.280 --> 0:47:23.960
<v Speaker 2>for the quarterback exactly. And so I just think I

0:47:24.000 --> 0:47:27.360
<v Speaker 2>think that is a stumbling block for defensive coaches. And

0:47:27.400 --> 0:47:29.759
<v Speaker 2>I think if you're the Patriots and you get Caleb Williams,

0:47:30.120 --> 0:47:33.160
<v Speaker 2>you're gonna Belichick's not gonna be the one who gets

0:47:33.200 --> 0:47:36.680
<v Speaker 2>a chance to develop him. All right, whatever questions you've got,

0:47:36.680 --> 0:47:39.360
<v Speaker 2>we're gonna skip right in. We'll do your questions quickly

0:47:39.400 --> 0:47:41.839
<v Speaker 2>in the next segment, and then I gotta run to work.

0:47:41.880 --> 0:47:44.399
<v Speaker 2>Talk to you guys. We'll not talk to you later

0:47:44.600 --> 0:47:52.480
<v Speaker 2>to your questions in a moment. What's Right? Welcome back,

0:47:52.520 --> 0:47:54.880
<v Speaker 2>What's Driving the Right? Episode one ninety five. This episode

0:47:54.880 --> 0:47:56.919
<v Speaker 2>of What Right is brought to you by the McDonald's App.

0:47:56.960 --> 0:47:59.319
<v Speaker 2>I love the McDonald's app for mick Delivery. I love

0:47:59.320 --> 0:48:02.200
<v Speaker 2>it because it's per fick for every situation pouring rain,

0:48:02.239 --> 0:48:05.000
<v Speaker 2>don't want to go out and get your mcdouble McDelivery.

0:48:05.200 --> 0:48:06.799
<v Speaker 2>Let's say your team's playing you don't want to miss

0:48:06.840 --> 0:48:09.879
<v Speaker 2>a single second McDelivery. Let's say it's been a long day.

0:48:09.920 --> 0:48:12.320
<v Speaker 2>What better way to fix it than getting a delicious

0:48:12.400 --> 0:48:14.520
<v Speaker 2>quarter pounder with cheese and a large fry delivered right

0:48:14.560 --> 0:48:17.520
<v Speaker 2>to your door. I personally love to order McDelivery when

0:48:17.560 --> 0:48:19.680
<v Speaker 2>I'm watching a game or spending time with my family.

0:48:19.719 --> 0:48:22.160
<v Speaker 2>And now every time you order mcdlivery in the McDonald's

0:48:22.200 --> 0:48:24.920
<v Speaker 2>app that earns you points towards free food, and who

0:48:25.000 --> 0:48:28.000
<v Speaker 2>doesn't like free food? So there's always a reason to

0:48:28.120 --> 0:48:30.960
<v Speaker 2>order in the McDonald's app Donald McDonald's app today at

0:48:30.960 --> 0:48:34.440
<v Speaker 2>participating McDonald's delivery, prices may be higher than a restaurant's delivery,

0:48:34.440 --> 0:48:38.560
<v Speaker 2>and other fees may apply Copyright twenty twenty three McDonald's.

0:48:38.600 --> 0:48:40.880
<v Speaker 2>All right, DEMANDE let's go through some of these questions,

0:48:40.880 --> 0:48:42.080
<v Speaker 2>and then I got to get out of here.

0:48:42.480 --> 0:48:45.200
<v Speaker 3>Matthew Flowers asked, do you think the enemy might prep

0:48:45.239 --> 0:48:49.240
<v Speaker 3>the wide receiver corps better? Wide receiver corps better than Naggy?

0:48:50.440 --> 0:48:54.920
<v Speaker 2>So, uh, I don't know, listen the wide receiver coaching.

0:48:55.520 --> 0:48:57.960
<v Speaker 2>I know people in Kansas City have had issues with.

0:48:58.200 --> 0:49:00.919
<v Speaker 2>What I will say is I wonder if the enemy

0:49:01.040 --> 0:49:03.839
<v Speaker 2>was a big part of second half adjustments because that's

0:49:03.880 --> 0:49:06.520
<v Speaker 2>an area this year's team has been lagging, and so

0:49:06.640 --> 0:49:08.759
<v Speaker 2>like you gotta be fair here, you know, I mean,

0:49:08.800 --> 0:49:11.200
<v Speaker 2>I thought the enemy was a really sharp guy that

0:49:11.320 --> 0:49:14.759
<v Speaker 2>deserved a had coaching opportunity. And while Sam Howell you know,

0:49:15.120 --> 0:49:17.439
<v Speaker 2>gets sacked and turns the ball over a million times

0:49:17.480 --> 0:49:20.040
<v Speaker 2>a game, he's I think second in the league still

0:49:20.040 --> 0:49:23.120
<v Speaker 2>in passing yards, so he's doing something there. So yeah,

0:49:23.160 --> 0:49:24.880
<v Speaker 2>I do think they missed the enemy to a degree.

0:49:24.880 --> 0:49:25.200
<v Speaker 2>All right.

0:49:25.320 --> 0:49:29.200
<v Speaker 3>Next, I not asked if Mahomes switched with Party with

0:49:29.680 --> 0:49:31.520
<v Speaker 3>would the forty nine ers be the best team of

0:49:31.560 --> 0:49:32.080
<v Speaker 3>all time?

0:49:33.360 --> 0:49:37.040
<v Speaker 2>Well, yeah, obviously yes, but the but you don't have

0:49:37.080 --> 0:49:39.319
<v Speaker 2>to take it that far like this is and this

0:49:39.360 --> 0:49:42.560
<v Speaker 2>is my party frustration. If the forty nine ers had

0:49:42.600 --> 0:49:46.200
<v Speaker 2>Dak Prescott, they would be far and away the best

0:49:46.239 --> 0:49:50.879
<v Speaker 2>team in the league, far and away. And the if

0:49:50.880 --> 0:49:55.880
<v Speaker 2>they had Justin Herbert, they would be far and away

0:49:55.960 --> 0:49:59.080
<v Speaker 2>the best team in the league. Like that's the point

0:49:59.120 --> 0:50:03.120
<v Speaker 2>that I end people can disagree with me. I don't

0:50:03.120 --> 0:50:05.520
<v Speaker 2>think they actually disagree, I just think they don't like

0:50:05.560 --> 0:50:06.920
<v Speaker 2>the conversation, all right.

0:50:07.000 --> 0:50:11.560
<v Speaker 3>Next, Uh, Noah Rodriguez said, you said on TV yesterday

0:50:11.600 --> 0:50:14.760
<v Speaker 3>that Chet is clearly the rookie of the year. How

0:50:15.200 --> 0:50:19.920
<v Speaker 3>Wimby averages more points, rebounds, assist in blocks, and draws

0:50:20.000 --> 0:50:22.440
<v Speaker 3>all the defenses, all the defensive attention.

0:50:24.200 --> 0:50:28.560
<v Speaker 2>Okay, Well, because Chet's been better. Chet's been doing it

0:50:28.600 --> 0:50:32.440
<v Speaker 2>in high leverage, high pressure situations on a good team.

0:50:32.760 --> 0:50:37.239
<v Speaker 2>He's not getting winning. And again, the Rookie of the

0:50:37.360 --> 0:50:39.520
<v Speaker 2>Year is usually not about winning or losing. Is the

0:50:39.600 --> 0:50:41.799
<v Speaker 2>rookies but for Chet it is. And here's the thing.

0:50:42.040 --> 0:50:46.120
<v Speaker 2>Wimby is averaging eighteen and a half, nine rebounds, two

0:50:46.160 --> 0:50:48.680
<v Speaker 2>and a half assists, two and a half blocks. Chet

0:50:48.719 --> 0:50:52.000
<v Speaker 2>is averaging seventeen points, eight rebounds, two and a half assists,

0:50:52.040 --> 0:50:55.719
<v Speaker 2>two blocks. So it's Wimby is averaging a point and

0:50:55.719 --> 0:50:59.239
<v Speaker 2>a half more and two and one rebound more. The

0:50:59.480 --> 0:51:04.000
<v Speaker 2>different is Wimby is doing it on forty two percent

0:51:04.200 --> 0:51:08.280
<v Speaker 2>from the field twenty seven percent from three, and Chet

0:51:08.360 --> 0:51:12.240
<v Speaker 2>is doing it on fifty seven percent from the field

0:51:12.760 --> 0:51:16.440
<v Speaker 2>forty six percent from three. Listen, you guys know I

0:51:16.480 --> 0:51:20.520
<v Speaker 2>did not believe in Chet. He's been awesome. I got it.

0:51:20.560 --> 0:51:22.960
<v Speaker 2>Fair is fair. It's not that Wimby's been bad, but

0:51:23.040 --> 0:51:26.239
<v Speaker 2>Chet has clearly been the rookie of the year. It's

0:51:26.280 --> 0:51:29.520
<v Speaker 2>not it's in my bet. I have a big bet

0:51:29.560 --> 0:51:32.319
<v Speaker 2>on Scoot Inderson to win it. That's not gonna work out.

0:51:32.640 --> 0:51:36.560
<v Speaker 2>It's gotta be fair. I mean, it's obviously Chet, I

0:51:36.560 --> 0:51:40.319
<v Speaker 2>mean again, and it obviously can change. We're fifteen games in.

0:51:40.440 --> 0:51:42.399
<v Speaker 2>I'm not saying that that's who it is, but up

0:51:42.520 --> 0:51:47.120
<v Speaker 2>at this benchmark, it's obviously Chet. All right, Uh? Next one?

0:51:48.320 --> 0:51:52.360
<v Speaker 3>Producers ask Nick Cool analogy earlier. How awesome does Demons

0:51:52.480 --> 0:51:54.279
<v Speaker 3>look in his can't miss pretty convertible?

0:51:55.280 --> 0:51:58.600
<v Speaker 2>I think, oh, look at that. Oh, I mean, Demanse

0:51:58.760 --> 0:52:02.160
<v Speaker 2>would look great in a sports car, it kind of

0:52:04.600 --> 0:52:09.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, yeah, yeah, the you know, if I hadn't

0:52:09.640 --> 0:52:12.520
<v Speaker 2>gotten knocked out of the Circus Survivor contest a month

0:52:12.560 --> 0:52:15.160
<v Speaker 2>ago and I was still alive for that nine million.

0:52:15.160 --> 0:52:19.080
<v Speaker 3>Maybe wait, we still have our lions top of the

0:52:19.320 --> 0:52:19.680
<v Speaker 3>a f C.

0:52:19.880 --> 0:52:22.600
<v Speaker 2>So yeah, that's not I mean that that. I might

0:52:22.600 --> 0:52:25.600
<v Speaker 2>get you a model car like a leg you know

0:52:25.600 --> 0:52:27.600
<v Speaker 2>what I mean, one we could build together, or something

0:52:27.600 --> 0:52:29.800
<v Speaker 2>that's not gonna I don't know how much you think.

0:52:29.680 --> 0:52:32.640
<v Speaker 3>I thought we went down that I mean.

0:52:32.520 --> 0:52:36.839
<v Speaker 2>We did, but not not vehicle amounts. I mean it

0:52:36.880 --> 0:52:43.520
<v Speaker 2>was I mean, I mean, yeah, yeah, enough for a

0:52:43.640 --> 0:52:46.640
<v Speaker 2>down payment, but then but then you're on the hook

0:52:46.719 --> 0:52:49.399
<v Speaker 2>for the monthly payments. Can't do it? All right? Love

0:52:49.440 --> 0:52:52.120
<v Speaker 2>you guys, have a great Thanksgiving. I'll see you guys

0:52:52.239 --> 0:52:54.640
<v Speaker 2>on my you know, Coward show, than my show, than

0:52:54.680 --> 0:52:58.040
<v Speaker 2>Mini Times Show, than Coward Show again. As everyone tries

0:52:58.080 --> 0:52:59.600
<v Speaker 2>to tork to me about the Chiefs, But I told you,

0:53:00.040 --> 0:53:02.440
<v Speaker 2>thing's fine, talk to you guys later. What's right? Hey,

0:53:02.520 --> 0:53:04.680
<v Speaker 2>it's nick er right. Thank you so much for watching.

0:53:04.760 --> 0:53:07.719
<v Speaker 2>Please do us a favor click subscribe. It helps my

0:53:07.840 --> 0:53:11.360
<v Speaker 2>ego and Demandy's got a financial bonus writing on a

0:53:11.440 --> 0:53:14.320
<v Speaker 2>number of YouTube subscribers, so help him out. And also

0:53:14.440 --> 0:53:16.120
<v Speaker 2>click the bell. I don't know what the bell does,

0:53:16.160 --> 0:53:17.839
<v Speaker 2>but they tell me to tell you to click the bell.

0:53:18.120 --> 0:53:21.720
<v Speaker 2>And you're audio listeners. People that have commutes, drives, whatever

0:53:21.760 --> 0:53:24.880
<v Speaker 2>it is. Subscribe to the podcast as well. Wherever you

0:53:24.920 --> 0:53:27.600
<v Speaker 2>get the podcast, same show, just you know, just in

0:53:27.640 --> 0:53:29.799
<v Speaker 2>your ears instead of through your eyes. All that check

0:53:29.800 --> 0:53:30.719
<v Speaker 2>it out. Appreciate y'all.