WEBVTT - Draft Show: Finding Some Day Two Value

0:00:03.880 --> 0:00:08.400
<v Speaker 1>He's the Dallas Cowboys dot Com Draft Show, your war

0:00:08.560 --> 0:00:12.240
<v Speaker 1>room for incenter news and draft analysis from deep within

0:00:12.320 --> 0:00:15.760
<v Speaker 1>the confines of Cowboys Headquarters at the Star in Fresco,

0:00:16.040 --> 0:00:23.000
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys Liked d Lamb and now your hosts Dane Brugler,

0:00:23.360 --> 0:00:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Kavanaugh, Kevin Turner and Kyle Yeoman's. There are one

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:36.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred and eleven days until the NFL drafting Cleveland, Ohio,

0:00:36.920 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 1>April twenty nine, twenty twenty one, but zero days to

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 1>wait for the Dallas Cowboys dot Com Draft Show. As

0:00:43.400 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>we are back second time this weekend. It's twice the

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:50.960
<v Speaker 1>Draft Show all the way through until the NFL Draft,

0:00:51.000 --> 0:00:53.520
<v Speaker 1>even some weeks we may have some more draft show

0:00:53.560 --> 0:00:55.480
<v Speaker 1>for you, but it's double dipping from here on out

0:00:55.800 --> 0:00:59.840
<v Speaker 1>due to the Cowboys losing their chances at a playoff.

0:01:00.240 --> 0:01:03.320
<v Speaker 1>But glad to be joined as always by Dan Brugler,

0:01:03.480 --> 0:01:05.840
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Turner, and then hey, how about this, We've got

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:08.560
<v Speaker 1>David Hellman back on the show after missing on Tuesday.

0:01:08.840 --> 0:01:12.000
<v Speaker 1>That's the glory of this kind of weak Helman and

0:01:12.920 --> 0:01:15.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of this scenario with what Derek is built with

0:01:15.520 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 1>the Draft show because we had Jeff Kavanaugh fill in

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 1>on Tuesday, came into, did a great job with Bucky

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:22.720
<v Speaker 1>and Brian, and then now you get to come in

0:01:22.760 --> 0:01:26.120
<v Speaker 1>and substitute for a day. So the talent is always

0:01:26.160 --> 0:01:28.920
<v Speaker 1>there and everyone's going to get a voice whenever it

0:01:28.920 --> 0:01:31.560
<v Speaker 1>comes to these drafts. Yeah, it's kind of ironic because

0:01:31.720 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 1>when we talked about this, you know, gigantic lineup, I

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:37.679
<v Speaker 1>was really I was a little bit confused about how

0:01:37.680 --> 0:01:39.280
<v Speaker 1>it was going to work. And here we are, like

0:01:39.360 --> 0:01:41.560
<v Speaker 1>one week into the offseason. I'm like, oh, yeah, like

0:01:42.000 --> 0:01:44.280
<v Speaker 1>this is pretty great. We can mix and match as

0:01:44.319 --> 0:01:47.840
<v Speaker 1>we need to because of everybody's schedules. So it's cool

0:01:47.880 --> 0:01:50.640
<v Speaker 1>to see y'all instead of Brian's old face for a change.

0:01:52.280 --> 0:01:54.360
<v Speaker 1>It's great. For the most part, we all get along.

0:01:54.440 --> 0:01:56.600
<v Speaker 1>So that's you know, for the most part, we all

0:01:56.720 --> 0:01:59.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of you know, for the most part, for the

0:01:59.600 --> 0:02:03.680
<v Speaker 1>most part. Who are you referring to here, Katie, I'm saying,

0:02:03.760 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 1>I you know, so some of us can disagree on

0:02:06.480 --> 0:02:08.680
<v Speaker 1>if Yeah, sometimes you disagree on if you want to

0:02:08.680 --> 0:02:13.400
<v Speaker 1>win games or not. So but that's over and we

0:02:13.480 --> 0:02:16.200
<v Speaker 1>will never talk about it again, we hope, because they

0:02:16.240 --> 0:02:19.919
<v Speaker 1>will never miss the playoffs again after this year's draft,

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Like your attitude. We're gonna fix the draft that that much,

0:02:23.600 --> 0:02:26.160
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna fix this team that much. But I mean,

0:02:26.280 --> 0:02:28.520
<v Speaker 1>I like your way of thinking, and we're gonna kind

0:02:28.520 --> 0:02:31.120
<v Speaker 1>of get into maybe some second third round guys. Today

0:02:31.160 --> 0:02:34.200
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna talk about the National Championship game of course

0:02:34.200 --> 0:02:39.440
<v Speaker 1>coming up, and Heisman winner Davante Smith, first wide receiver

0:02:39.520 --> 0:02:42.639
<v Speaker 1>to win the Heisman since nineteen ninety one. But I

0:02:42.720 --> 0:02:45.080
<v Speaker 1>want to kind of go into how to fix this

0:02:45.160 --> 0:02:47.960
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys team, Katie. I mean, you kind of look at

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>ahead a little bit. I mean, that loss to the

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:54.200
<v Speaker 1>Giants secured that number ten overall pick, but it also

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:56.799
<v Speaker 1>showed a lot of the holes. It showed a lot

0:02:56.840 --> 0:03:00.720
<v Speaker 1>of the issues with this Cowboys team, specifically on the

0:03:00.720 --> 0:03:03.720
<v Speaker 1>defensive side of the football, and it kind of compounded

0:03:03.800 --> 0:03:07.080
<v Speaker 1>what was the twenty twenty season into one game. But

0:03:07.480 --> 0:03:10.400
<v Speaker 1>whenever you look at the first round talent, we've kind

0:03:10.440 --> 0:03:12.639
<v Speaker 1>of talked about the far Leaves and the Curtans and

0:03:13.080 --> 0:03:14.960
<v Speaker 1>all these different players that could potentially go in the

0:03:15.000 --> 0:03:17.880
<v Speaker 1>first round, But if you look into Day two, where

0:03:17.960 --> 0:03:21.639
<v Speaker 1>is the majority of the talent. Is it at defensive tackle,

0:03:21.720 --> 0:03:23.520
<v Speaker 1>is it at linebacker? Where are we going to find

0:03:23.560 --> 0:03:26.840
<v Speaker 1>somebody that's going to fix this defense KT that the

0:03:26.880 --> 0:03:30.520
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys need desperately. Yeah. Yeah, I mean, I'm a guy

0:03:30.560 --> 0:03:35.279
<v Speaker 1>who's pretty big on this secondary needs to be rebuilt.

0:03:36.200 --> 0:03:38.480
<v Speaker 1>And the rebuilt process might have already happened with you know,

0:03:38.560 --> 0:03:40.960
<v Speaker 1>Trevon Dix coming in, and you were lucky to get

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:42.920
<v Speaker 1>him at fifty one last year at which we felt

0:03:42.920 --> 0:03:44.880
<v Speaker 1>he was or I felt they were lucky to get

0:03:44.960 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 1>him at fifty one. You mentioned DT and linebacker. Those

0:03:47.880 --> 0:03:49.880
<v Speaker 1>are areas that I do want them to address. And

0:03:49.880 --> 0:03:52.160
<v Speaker 1>I think they could use another defensive end as well.

0:03:52.440 --> 0:03:54.200
<v Speaker 1>And I would have liked it seen some more Bradley

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:58.320
<v Speaker 1>and I you know, on the active list on game day.

0:03:58.560 --> 0:04:02.880
<v Speaker 1>But I I'm liking what you might have at cornerback there.

0:04:03.400 --> 0:04:05.480
<v Speaker 1>If you look at the Cowboys were picking at forty four.

0:04:06.240 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't think it's crazy to think that

0:04:09.160 --> 0:04:11.720
<v Speaker 1>you could get you could be double up at cornerback

0:04:11.720 --> 0:04:13.760
<v Speaker 1>if you needed to. You know, you already have Anthony Brown,

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:16.320
<v Speaker 1>who I think is a solid player. But you know,

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:20.280
<v Speaker 1>I think I think the depth, you're gonna you're gonna

0:04:20.320 --> 0:04:22.760
<v Speaker 1>hit a spot where you feel like you're kind of dry.

0:04:23.120 --> 0:04:26.400
<v Speaker 1>But as Eric Stokes from Georgia there at forty four

0:04:26.560 --> 0:04:29.240
<v Speaker 1>is Tyson Campbell from Georgia there at forty four. Do

0:04:29.320 --> 0:04:31.919
<v Speaker 1>you like them? Um? You know there some questions that

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:35.000
<v Speaker 1>are they're gonna come up? How far do you feel

0:04:35.000 --> 0:04:38.040
<v Speaker 1>like you need a slot guy? And maybe Elijah Molden

0:04:38.160 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 1>from Washington, who to me has kind of a defensive

0:04:41.960 --> 0:04:47.320
<v Speaker 1>Cole Beasley attack Junkyard dog mentality. Uh. Greg Newsom from

0:04:47.320 --> 0:04:50.440
<v Speaker 1>from Northwestern is a really good player. You know, if

0:04:50.480 --> 0:04:52.560
<v Speaker 1>you want to double up at cornerback, I think you

0:04:52.600 --> 0:04:54.800
<v Speaker 1>could do that. We've seen this team do that and

0:04:54.880 --> 0:04:57.080
<v Speaker 1>the twenty seventeen draft that I think we look back

0:04:57.080 --> 0:05:00.479
<v Speaker 1>on and go, what a great draft. But I think

0:05:00.480 --> 0:05:04.640
<v Speaker 1>that's a possibility, and I'm more excited about taking two cornerbacks.

0:05:04.640 --> 0:05:06.599
<v Speaker 1>I think that I would be you know, taking a

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:11.080
<v Speaker 1>linebacker in round two? Dan, what do you think about

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:13.600
<v Speaker 1>some of the names that Katie just thrown through out there?

0:05:13.640 --> 0:05:16.600
<v Speaker 1>But also the fact that thinking about double dipping is

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:19.360
<v Speaker 1>not something new. They even did it last year at

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:21.839
<v Speaker 1>corner with Reggie Robinson. I know they moved him into safety,

0:05:21.880 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 1>but then you had digs in the second but double

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:26.120
<v Speaker 1>dipping in days one and two is kind of what

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:29.039
<v Speaker 1>Katie's alluding to here, is that a possibility for the

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys with the talent that's on the table. Oh? Absolutely,

0:05:32.480 --> 0:05:35.679
<v Speaker 1>And the Cowboys have shown their hand in the past

0:05:35.720 --> 0:05:38.880
<v Speaker 1>few years that hey, they think they feel pretty good

0:05:38.880 --> 0:05:41.920
<v Speaker 1>about finding corners on Day two of the draft with

0:05:42.440 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the returns with Woozier, you know, with obviously Trevon Diggs

0:05:48.600 --> 0:05:50.640
<v Speaker 1>he did as a rookie. Came out with my All

0:05:50.720 --> 0:05:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Rookie team on the Athletic this week, and Trevon Diggs

0:05:54.040 --> 0:05:57.839
<v Speaker 1>was my number one corner despite missing missing a few games,

0:05:57.880 --> 0:06:01.400
<v Speaker 1>he was I thought, even though and there were some

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:04.120
<v Speaker 1>rough patches there, but he was the most consistent from

0:06:04.120 --> 0:06:07.039
<v Speaker 1>start to finish. And so I think if you're if

0:06:07.040 --> 0:06:10.000
<v Speaker 1>you're the Cowboys, you feel pretty good about your chances

0:06:10.000 --> 0:06:13.120
<v Speaker 1>of finding a corner, whether that's h and Katie set

0:06:13.120 --> 0:06:15.160
<v Speaker 1>it up nicely with a lot of those names. Um,

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:17.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, if I think maybe like a Tyson Campbell,

0:06:18.279 --> 0:06:20.559
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a good chance he goes one because

0:06:20.600 --> 0:06:23.640
<v Speaker 1>the traits are just so remarkable. But if you can

0:06:23.720 --> 0:06:27.040
<v Speaker 1>find a guy like an Assante Samuel because he's gonna

0:06:27.040 --> 0:06:29.799
<v Speaker 1>get dinged because of the size, but just like his dad,

0:06:29.960 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 1>the ball skills, the instincts, the reaction quickness. He makes plays.

0:06:34.680 --> 0:06:37.040
<v Speaker 1>And so if you're able to get an assante Samuel

0:06:37.040 --> 0:06:39.760
<v Speaker 1>in the second round, that's a heck of a find. Um.

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:42.320
<v Speaker 1>You know another name I would they're out there. He

0:06:42.400 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 1>fought to U Melifon Wu from Syracuse, another guy I know.

0:06:46.480 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Katie likes him too. All the traits are there. I mean,

0:06:50.000 --> 0:06:52.200
<v Speaker 1>if you want traits, He's got up sixty three, two

0:06:52.240 --> 0:06:56.160
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifteen pounds, He's twitchy, he moves well. I

0:06:56.160 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>think he could play press, he could play zone. U

0:06:59.320 --> 0:07:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Melifon was kind of a name that isn't talked about

0:07:02.400 --> 0:07:04.680
<v Speaker 1>a whole lot. But I wouldn't be surprised if he

0:07:04.760 --> 0:07:10.280
<v Speaker 1>ends up somewhere on day two. You just you sorry, Sorry, Dan,

0:07:10.360 --> 0:07:12.200
<v Speaker 1>You broke my heart a little bit there, because like

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:14.960
<v Speaker 1>we bring up we bring up Tyson Campbell. This is

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:17.520
<v Speaker 1>the I mean, we do this every year where I'm like, okay,

0:07:17.600 --> 0:07:20.000
<v Speaker 1>You're like you're telling me Tyson Campbell might be in

0:07:20.080 --> 0:07:23.760
<v Speaker 1>play at forty four like this, you know, six, one

0:07:24.120 --> 0:07:27.400
<v Speaker 1>big cornerback from the SEC, Like sign me the hell up.

0:07:27.440 --> 0:07:30.640
<v Speaker 1>And then you're like, no, yeah, he's he's physically rare

0:07:30.760 --> 0:07:34.600
<v Speaker 1>enough that he might not be available for you well,

0:07:34.640 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 1>and I mean I don't did any of us think

0:07:36.560 --> 0:07:39.600
<v Speaker 1>Trevon Diggs was was going to fall to fifty one,

0:07:39.640 --> 0:07:42.559
<v Speaker 1>you know, so you know, you never say never, But

0:07:43.480 --> 0:07:45.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think Campbell's got a better chance to

0:07:45.840 --> 0:07:49.240
<v Speaker 1>be you know, like an AJ Terrell, Uh, you know,

0:07:49.280 --> 0:07:52.800
<v Speaker 1>a guy that there's some some it tapes, not perfect.

0:07:52.840 --> 0:07:54.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean he I wish you would play just a

0:07:54.480 --> 0:07:58.840
<v Speaker 1>little more loose um with with his play style. But

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the traits you can't coach. You know, He's born with

0:08:03.200 --> 0:08:05.880
<v Speaker 1>a lot of those, and so I think that there's

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:08.000
<v Speaker 1>a better chance he's gonna end up somewhere in the

0:08:08.000 --> 0:08:11.480
<v Speaker 1>first round. But yeah, you just never know. Guys with

0:08:11.800 --> 0:08:13.600
<v Speaker 1>those types of traits, you bet on it if he

0:08:13.680 --> 0:08:15.720
<v Speaker 1>were to fall into the second round, do you jump

0:08:15.760 --> 0:08:19.000
<v Speaker 1>all over that? Just as a oh sorry, co go ahead,

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 1>just as a general statement, I like here in this

0:08:23.480 --> 0:08:26.480
<v Speaker 1>because and obviously things are going to change. Free agency

0:08:26.600 --> 0:08:30.400
<v Speaker 1>is going to happen. But it's hard to ignore cornerback

0:08:30.760 --> 0:08:33.760
<v Speaker 1>as this team's biggest trouble spot right now just because

0:08:33.760 --> 0:08:35.280
<v Speaker 1>they don't have any I mean, we don't know what's

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:39.280
<v Speaker 1>going to happen to Cheeto or Jordan Lewis, and you know,

0:08:39.360 --> 0:08:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Reggie Robinson first of all was moved to safety and

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:44.440
<v Speaker 1>second of all didn't play, so you don't even know

0:08:44.480 --> 0:08:47.920
<v Speaker 1>what you have in him, and so they need bodies,

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:50.679
<v Speaker 1>and so it's at least encouraging to think that they

0:08:50.679 --> 0:08:54.559
<v Speaker 1>can potentially double up or find guys, you know, with

0:08:54.600 --> 0:08:56.560
<v Speaker 1>that second pick. If they don't get one in the

0:08:56.600 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 1>top ten, or even if they do, I have al

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:03.960
<v Speaker 1>that's going to change, but it's still nice to know, well,

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 1>if they're in the second round, there's day two looking

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:08.800
<v Speaker 1>at all these corners, and there are some good names there.

0:09:08.800 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, outside of the Campbells and the Waves, I

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:12.720
<v Speaker 1>mean there's the guys like the Eric Stokes and the

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:15.160
<v Speaker 1>Essante Samuel Junior who may not be there in the

0:09:15.160 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 1>second round, but or at least second round conversation guys.

0:09:18.520 --> 0:09:22.280
<v Speaker 1>Would that deter this team from potentially taking a corner

0:09:22.360 --> 0:09:24.560
<v Speaker 1>like a certain or a Farley in the top ten?

0:09:24.880 --> 0:09:27.319
<v Speaker 1>I mean, because I know we're talking about double dipping

0:09:27.360 --> 0:09:29.800
<v Speaker 1>here and if that's a possibility, sure, it's a possibility,

0:09:30.080 --> 0:09:33.520
<v Speaker 1>But knowing that there's guys on the back end, does

0:09:33.559 --> 0:09:35.520
<v Speaker 1>it make you feel better up in that first round?

0:09:35.640 --> 0:09:38.880
<v Speaker 1>Dane because I know the defensive tackle talent isn't there

0:09:38.920 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 1>for a top ten pick, and the same thing with

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 1>maybe a linebacker outside of Micah Parsons. But it does

0:09:44.400 --> 0:09:47.079
<v Speaker 1>it deter a team away if you're wanting to go

0:09:47.640 --> 0:09:52.000
<v Speaker 1>corner the fact that there might be some water on. Yeah,

0:09:52.080 --> 0:09:57.079
<v Speaker 1>I think it's an interesting philosophical approach that, you know,

0:09:57.200 --> 0:09:59.480
<v Speaker 1>I think there's going to be different opinions on because

0:10:00.320 --> 0:10:02.760
<v Speaker 1>there's some logic to what you're saying. You know, if

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:05.640
<v Speaker 1>a position is stronger on Day two, then why not

0:10:05.720 --> 0:10:08.320
<v Speaker 1>go with a position that's still something that you could

0:10:08.840 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 1>that you need and because you know there's a better

0:10:11.559 --> 0:10:14.480
<v Speaker 1>chance just odds that they are better odds there's going

0:10:14.520 --> 0:10:16.800
<v Speaker 1>to be a player at that other position later on.

0:10:16.920 --> 0:10:19.920
<v Speaker 1>So it makes sense. But I also think that with

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:23.839
<v Speaker 1>every round that goes lowers your chances of hitting, and

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:26.959
<v Speaker 1>so I think it's important in the first round to hit,

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>and that means drafting the best player on your board,

0:10:30.760 --> 0:10:32.920
<v Speaker 1>and you know it's that that gets into the whole

0:10:33.040 --> 0:10:36.679
<v Speaker 1>best player available conversation and all that. I just think

0:10:36.720 --> 0:10:38.200
<v Speaker 1>when you have a top ten pick, you need a

0:10:38.280 --> 0:10:40.760
<v Speaker 1>draft who's going to make the biggest impact on your roster,

0:10:41.000 --> 0:10:43.959
<v Speaker 1>and you know, that might be a corner, that might

0:10:44.000 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 1>be a tackle. You know, it might be you know,

0:10:47.000 --> 0:10:49.679
<v Speaker 1>if we think about it. Okay, let's say four quarterbacks

0:10:49.679 --> 0:10:52.160
<v Speaker 1>do end up going top ten, which would only be

0:10:52.280 --> 0:10:55.320
<v Speaker 1>the second time since nineteen sixty it's ever happened. But

0:10:55.360 --> 0:10:59.480
<v Speaker 1>it's possible. That would mean you're getting this theoretically to

0:10:59.600 --> 0:11:03.800
<v Speaker 1>six best non quarterback in this draft. That's pretty good.

0:11:03.840 --> 0:11:05.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you feel pretty good about that. And so

0:11:05.960 --> 0:11:08.960
<v Speaker 1>I think you have to, you know, go after the

0:11:09.000 --> 0:11:11.000
<v Speaker 1>best player. That might be a cable far then that

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:14.840
<v Speaker 1>might be Patrick Surtan. But if you think those guys

0:11:14.920 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 1>are on the same tier as a you know, a

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:23.439
<v Speaker 1>linebacker or a pass rusher, then maybe you do go

0:11:23.760 --> 0:11:25.560
<v Speaker 1>with one of those other positions and make sure you

0:11:25.559 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>get your corner later. I will say this though, I

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:31.400
<v Speaker 1>think pass rusher is also a very strong position. We

0:11:31.480 --> 0:11:33.920
<v Speaker 1>don't have that top ten guy or that that lock

0:11:34.040 --> 0:11:37.839
<v Speaker 1>top ten guy this year, but in the mid first round,

0:11:38.000 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>in the second round, third round, there are some intriguing

0:11:40.800 --> 0:11:44.960
<v Speaker 1>pass rushers in this class. Yeah, and that's another thing

0:11:44.960 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 1>about this roster. You know, I think Randy Gregory has

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:51.080
<v Speaker 1>earned a starting job next year, But you know, you

0:11:51.200 --> 0:11:54.679
<v Speaker 1>just can't lock that in and kind of the way

0:11:54.679 --> 0:11:56.880
<v Speaker 1>I would think about this if I was working in

0:11:56.920 --> 0:11:59.360
<v Speaker 1>an NFL front office, and god knows I'm not, but

0:11:59.440 --> 0:12:02.080
<v Speaker 1>if I was, I'm more in the boat of let's

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:04.520
<v Speaker 1>just take the best player we can again and let's

0:12:04.520 --> 0:12:06.800
<v Speaker 1>fill out this roster. But if I'm a team that

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:08.640
<v Speaker 1>has I feel like I have a top ten offense

0:12:08.679 --> 0:12:10.559
<v Speaker 1>and I feel like I have a top ten defense,

0:12:10.920 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 1>That's where I'm comfortable roadmapping the draft, which is what

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:16.520
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys have shown that they do a lot. In

0:12:16.559 --> 0:12:19.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty seventeen is the best example where they said we

0:12:19.120 --> 0:12:21.520
<v Speaker 1>are taking an edge player in the first round, ended

0:12:21.559 --> 0:12:25.480
<v Speaker 1>up taking Taco and then Cheeto and Jordan Lists. We knew,

0:12:25.840 --> 0:12:28.719
<v Speaker 1>because they knew the depth of the draft, that they

0:12:28.800 --> 0:12:32.160
<v Speaker 1>were going to attack the secondary on Day two, and

0:12:32.200 --> 0:12:35.360
<v Speaker 1>I just don't know if that philosophy works as well

0:12:35.760 --> 0:12:39.440
<v Speaker 1>when you've hit rock bottom like they did defensively this year.

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:41.240
<v Speaker 1>I think you just got to load up with the

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:44.000
<v Speaker 1>best players you can pick it. I think if you

0:12:44.080 --> 0:12:46.840
<v Speaker 1>spend too much time thinking about what might be there

0:12:46.840 --> 0:12:49.199
<v Speaker 1>on Day two, then you could lose out on something

0:12:49.240 --> 0:12:50.760
<v Speaker 1>on Day one. And I would say the same thing

0:12:50.800 --> 0:12:53.080
<v Speaker 1>about day three. We'll have them thinking too much about

0:12:53.120 --> 0:12:55.960
<v Speaker 1>what might be there in round four, you might miss

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:59.240
<v Speaker 1>something you know that's right underneath you right there on

0:12:59.320 --> 0:13:02.120
<v Speaker 1>day two, which that is my foss I want to go,

0:13:02.480 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 1>which I want to bring it back to kind of

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:06.920
<v Speaker 1>what Kyle led this off with. And Dane, you know,

0:13:07.000 --> 0:13:09.200
<v Speaker 1>I love to put you on the spot. I'm here,

0:13:09.760 --> 0:13:11.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm in mid January, and I'm gonna ask you this,

0:13:11.920 --> 0:13:13.920
<v Speaker 1>but like, but this is the this is the impression

0:13:13.920 --> 0:13:16.559
<v Speaker 1>that I get just from like, you know, I'm kind

0:13:16.559 --> 0:13:19.000
<v Speaker 1>of getting like knee deep into this draft class. Now.

0:13:19.920 --> 0:13:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Cornerback certainly seems like and all right, for the purposes

0:13:23.520 --> 0:13:26.720
<v Speaker 1>of this, we're talking about defense. Forget about Kyle Pitts,

0:13:27.160 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 1>forget about the offensive tackles, like we're just talking defense.

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:35.559
<v Speaker 1>Cornerback certainly seems like one of a few positions where

0:13:35.600 --> 0:13:38.679
<v Speaker 1>you have multiple guys that you feel good about in

0:13:38.720 --> 0:13:41.680
<v Speaker 1>that top ten spot. Like it doesn't seem like there's

0:13:41.679 --> 0:13:43.800
<v Speaker 1>a defensive tackle that you would want to pick there,

0:13:44.679 --> 0:13:48.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, Micah Parsons, maybe the Notre Dame guy who

0:13:49.040 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 1>apologies I'm blanking a Lusu Karamora, Jeremiah cory Um Okay,

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:58.400
<v Speaker 1>so that's three. I don't get the impression that there's

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:00.800
<v Speaker 1>a safety that you would feel good about drafting in that, right,

0:14:00.880 --> 0:14:05.680
<v Speaker 1>So cornerback and linebacker and maybe edge, although even edge, Like,

0:14:05.960 --> 0:14:08.240
<v Speaker 1>is there a guy that you would stand on the

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:12.200
<v Speaker 1>table four all the way up at ten? No? I

0:14:12.280 --> 0:14:15.240
<v Speaker 1>think maybe if they stick with a three four. I mean,

0:14:15.440 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Aziz Augilary is so intriguing to me, Like, I think

0:14:19.160 --> 0:14:22.640
<v Speaker 1>he's better than Clayveon Chason last year. I think he's

0:14:22.640 --> 0:14:25.960
<v Speaker 1>a better prospect. So that would be a guy that

0:14:26.640 --> 0:14:28.240
<v Speaker 1>would I stand on the table for him at ten.

0:14:28.320 --> 0:14:31.400
<v Speaker 1>Maybe not necessarily, you know that emphatically, but I would

0:14:31.480 --> 0:14:33.920
<v Speaker 1>definitely consider him. He would he has to be in

0:14:33.920 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 1>the conversation. One more name I think needs to be

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:39.480
<v Speaker 1>in there is Zaven Collins from Coulson. I was going

0:14:39.560 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 1>to ask about him later in the show. I really

0:14:41.640 --> 0:14:44.560
<v Speaker 1>like what he brings to the table and not I

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:48.680
<v Speaker 1>I know the Cowboys like him. I know they like

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 1>him in the first round, do I I don't know

0:14:51.320 --> 0:14:52.960
<v Speaker 1>if they like him top ten. I don't know if

0:14:52.960 --> 0:14:55.000
<v Speaker 1>they would consider him as high as ten, but I

0:14:55.160 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 1>know that they do really like him. And so that's

0:14:59.040 --> 0:15:00.800
<v Speaker 1>a name I think we need to keep on the

0:15:00.920 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 1>radar as as a guy that could potentially beat that choice.

0:15:05.960 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 1>Talking about him the first round, Dan, why was he

0:15:08.960 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 1>so far off the radar that he's just now starting

0:15:11.880 --> 0:15:14.400
<v Speaker 1>to kind of get some pub and get some recognition,

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:16.880
<v Speaker 1>because I feel like early on I never heard his name.

0:15:16.920 --> 0:15:18.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean whenever we were talking about some of these

0:15:18.880 --> 0:15:22.520
<v Speaker 1>defensive prospects. But then all of a sudden, he's popped up.

0:15:22.520 --> 0:15:24.920
<v Speaker 1>And I mean, of course I watched his tape yesterday

0:15:25.160 --> 0:15:26.960
<v Speaker 1>and for the first time, just because I was saying,

0:15:26.960 --> 0:15:29.840
<v Speaker 1>who's the Xavien Collins guy? People keep asking about. Well,

0:15:30.040 --> 0:15:31.760
<v Speaker 1>I really liked what he brought, but why did it

0:15:31.760 --> 0:15:34.640
<v Speaker 1>take so long for everybody to notice? Well, I mean,

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:37.640
<v Speaker 1>being playing at Tulsa's part of it, um, you know,

0:15:37.840 --> 0:15:41.720
<v Speaker 1>But he's he's a guy that back in you know,

0:15:41.840 --> 0:15:46.560
<v Speaker 1>October was getting first round love from from around guys

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:49.320
<v Speaker 1>around the league. So you know, it's just more of

0:15:49.640 --> 0:15:51.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, people on the outside kind of catching up.

0:15:52.800 --> 0:15:55.840
<v Speaker 1>But he's six three, two sixty. He moves so well

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:59.080
<v Speaker 1>for a guy that size, and I think he might

0:15:59.080 --> 0:16:01.680
<v Speaker 1>be a better fit for three to four because of

0:16:01.840 --> 0:16:04.200
<v Speaker 1>just the versatility that he brings as a pass rusher.

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:07.640
<v Speaker 1>He could be a natural samum, but there's just so

0:16:07.760 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 1>much to like about him as as a versatile linebacker

0:16:11.000 --> 0:16:13.080
<v Speaker 1>that can stay on the field and just give you

0:16:13.120 --> 0:16:16.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot so uh, you know, playing at Tulsa's part

0:16:16.320 --> 0:16:19.080
<v Speaker 1>of it, but man, if if you want a guy

0:16:19.080 --> 0:16:22.320
<v Speaker 1>with production, and he certainly had that, he provided impact play.

0:16:22.360 --> 0:16:24.520
<v Speaker 1>It seems like every single week, whether it's a pick

0:16:24.560 --> 0:16:28.120
<v Speaker 1>six or you know, a big tackle he's covering on

0:16:28.160 --> 0:16:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the outside. Zaven Collins is a guy that a lot

0:16:31.680 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 1>of teams like. And when you really boil it down

0:16:33.760 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 1>and you start stacking these players on a board, you realize, Okay,

0:16:37.640 --> 0:16:39.680
<v Speaker 1>I like Davin Collins more than this guy. Okay, yeah,

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:41.880
<v Speaker 1>takes Daven Collins over him, and all of a sudden

0:16:41.880 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 1>you realize he's closer to ten than maybe we thought

0:16:45.640 --> 0:16:49.000
<v Speaker 1>a couple a couple months ago when they were watching

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:51.120
<v Speaker 1>Reggie We're real quick. When they were watching Reggie Robinson

0:16:51.240 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 1>last year, they were going, wait, who's that guy? Oh

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:58.600
<v Speaker 1>my Ohumber high school quarterback? Okay, you know, playing linebacker. Okay,

0:16:58.640 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 1>it moves like that. Okay, falls to forties? Is there

0:17:03.200 --> 0:17:08.480
<v Speaker 1>a chance he falls to the forties? Nice? Yeah, yeah,

0:17:08.600 --> 0:17:11.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean like I said, I think he's a guy

0:17:11.480 --> 0:17:13.880
<v Speaker 1>that could be in the mix in the top fifteen,

0:17:14.000 --> 0:17:17.120
<v Speaker 1>so it would be a surprise, but you know, you'd

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:19.800
<v Speaker 1>ever know. Okay, can we step Coromoa for a minute,

0:17:19.800 --> 0:17:21.680
<v Speaker 1>because we don't talk about him a lot? I think

0:17:21.680 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 1>one frustrating thing. And you know, you don't never want

0:17:25.800 --> 0:17:28.359
<v Speaker 1>to rush these types of decisions, but I like, I

0:17:28.480 --> 0:17:33.120
<v Speaker 1>want decisions made about this defense immediately. Who is the DC?

0:17:33.520 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 1>Are we changing the scheme? Ye? What are we doing? Honestly?

0:17:38.680 --> 0:17:42.000
<v Speaker 1>And I don't want to be like like unfair, but

0:17:42.040 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 1>like you need to make a decision on Jalen Smith soon? Ye?

0:17:46.400 --> 0:17:50.080
<v Speaker 1>Like soon? Are you gonna make post June one cut him?

0:17:50.440 --> 0:17:52.879
<v Speaker 1>And you have a nine million dollar cap hit spread

0:17:52.920 --> 0:17:56.280
<v Speaker 1>out over four years and that's around that area. Are

0:17:56.280 --> 0:17:58.280
<v Speaker 1>you gonna post June one cut him? Are you bringing

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:01.080
<v Speaker 1>him back? I think you need to know. And Jermaine

0:18:01.080 --> 0:18:03.920
<v Speaker 1>Oosue Coromoa from Notre Dame is a type of guy

0:18:03.920 --> 0:18:06.280
<v Speaker 1>who I don't think is gonna suit every scheme, and

0:18:06.320 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 1>I think some teams are gonna go I think I

0:18:08.440 --> 0:18:12.080
<v Speaker 1>want to play him like maybe maybe Arizona utilizes you know,

0:18:12.119 --> 0:18:15.000
<v Speaker 1>Buddha Baker, you know, and there're gonna be some teaple

0:18:15.000 --> 0:18:16.720
<v Speaker 1>to say, you know what, he's my weak side linebacker.

0:18:18.200 --> 0:18:20.800
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna need to know those types of things when

0:18:20.800 --> 0:18:23.040
<v Speaker 1>he come to evaluating these players and how seriously you're

0:18:23.040 --> 0:18:26.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna take those guys. Because I love Coromoa's tape and

0:18:27.440 --> 0:18:29.240
<v Speaker 1>I just you sit here and go, I don't know

0:18:29.280 --> 0:18:32.200
<v Speaker 1>if this team would seriously take him or not, but

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:34.720
<v Speaker 1>that I think he's a guy who's new needs to

0:18:34.760 --> 0:18:37.040
<v Speaker 1>be considered as a top fifteen pick in this draft.

0:18:37.359 --> 0:18:40.040
<v Speaker 1>That is a wonderful point, Katie. And like you know,

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:42.520
<v Speaker 1>going back all the years that we did this show

0:18:43.040 --> 0:18:46.800
<v Speaker 1>when Rod Marinelli was the DC, I used to always say, like,

0:18:47.440 --> 0:18:50.360
<v Speaker 1>don't talk to me about these Swiss Army knife players

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:54.159
<v Speaker 1>because that's not what Rod Marinelli does. Like Rod Marinelli

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:57.919
<v Speaker 1>wants to put pegs into holes and like you're my end,

0:18:57.960 --> 0:19:00.720
<v Speaker 1>you're my end, you're my safety. Like you didn't see

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:04.560
<v Speaker 1>those versatile guys who move all over the defense playing here.

0:19:04.880 --> 0:19:08.199
<v Speaker 1>And obviously Rod's gone, but I don't feel like I

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:11.600
<v Speaker 1>have any better grasp of what Mike Nolan would do

0:19:11.640 --> 0:19:14.840
<v Speaker 1>with that type of player, Like I couldn't tell you,

0:19:15.080 --> 0:19:17.760
<v Speaker 1>which maybe that's an embarrassing thing to admit, like I

0:19:17.760 --> 0:19:20.399
<v Speaker 1>don't know what Mike Nolan does or like what he

0:19:20.440 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 1>wants to do, Like I don't have a good idea

0:19:24.200 --> 0:19:27.159
<v Speaker 1>of what that defense. Yeah, what's the identity of that defense?

0:19:27.240 --> 0:19:29.479
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. And we also don't even know if

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:31.320
<v Speaker 1>Mike Nolan's going to be the DC by the time

0:19:31.359 --> 0:19:34.080
<v Speaker 1>they pick, So, yeah, it would be very nice to

0:19:34.119 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 1>have some clarity about what their mission statement is for

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:42.679
<v Speaker 1>this defense, which hopefully we'll get that eventually. Yeah, but

0:19:42.760 --> 0:19:46.520
<v Speaker 1>it leads to identity, and there was no consistency. There

0:19:46.560 --> 0:19:49.679
<v Speaker 1>was zero consistency throughout the season, and so we're all

0:19:49.720 --> 0:19:51.600
<v Speaker 1>sitting here, like you said, Dave, with our hands up

0:19:51.640 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 1>in the air, like what are we doing? Where are

0:19:53.520 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 1>we going from here? Because we don't know what the

0:19:55.320 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 1>consistency is from a personnel standpoint? What are we doing

0:19:58.040 --> 0:20:00.560
<v Speaker 1>in the cornerback spot? What are we doing from winebackers?

0:20:00.600 --> 0:20:02.960
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Katie, you brought up a fantastic point because

0:20:03.240 --> 0:20:04.919
<v Speaker 1>we don't even know what scheme we're gonna run. We

0:20:04.920 --> 0:20:06.160
<v Speaker 1>don't know if it's gonna be a three to four

0:20:06.240 --> 0:20:08.400
<v Speaker 1>or four three. How are we going to pick efficiently

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:10.800
<v Speaker 1>if we don't know what that's going to be you

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:13.119
<v Speaker 1>know what, I think it's important to remember the highest

0:20:13.160 --> 0:20:16.720
<v Speaker 1>paid player in Dallas Cowboys franchise history is DeMarcus Lawrence.

0:20:17.359 --> 0:20:19.880
<v Speaker 1>DeMarcus Lawrence is probably suited to be a four to three.

0:20:19.920 --> 0:20:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Shall we build it around him? Now? I don't know

0:20:22.760 --> 0:20:24.720
<v Speaker 1>how how much longer is he going to be here,

0:20:25.160 --> 0:20:28.399
<v Speaker 1>but he is your highest paid player in franchise history.

0:20:28.520 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 1>Hopefully that changes. Hopefully that changes today. Hell who knows,

0:20:32.080 --> 0:20:35.840
<v Speaker 1>But like you know, I just I wonder if you

0:20:35.880 --> 0:20:39.520
<v Speaker 1>should go, you know what, let's let's let's make sure

0:20:39.560 --> 0:20:41.960
<v Speaker 1>we've got our left defensive end in de Marcus Lawrence,

0:20:42.200 --> 0:20:45.200
<v Speaker 1>We've got Randy Gregory right defensive end. We'll figure out

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:48.240
<v Speaker 1>what you know, we're gonna do. We like you know,

0:20:48.280 --> 0:20:51.040
<v Speaker 1>and I we like Dorrence Armstrong. Maybe we can add

0:20:51.080 --> 0:20:54.359
<v Speaker 1>another defensive end in this draft. I just think maybe

0:20:54.359 --> 0:20:57.080
<v Speaker 1>that's the way to go. Then trying to do this

0:20:57.080 --> 0:20:59.520
<v Speaker 1>whole thing that they talked about in multiple and fitting

0:20:59.560 --> 0:21:05.320
<v Speaker 1>players to a scheme, and that sounds so hypocritical after

0:21:05.640 --> 0:21:08.639
<v Speaker 1>years of going, well, they're not gonna get turnovers and

0:21:08.680 --> 0:21:10.840
<v Speaker 1>every team in the world knows what defense they're gonna run.

0:21:11.040 --> 0:21:13.119
<v Speaker 1>And I'm like, hey, man, Rod Marinelli, you want to

0:21:13.160 --> 0:21:18.960
<v Speaker 1>come back. That's insane. That's insane, I know, but building

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:21.520
<v Speaker 1>around take that might be the best thing. You're getting

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:23.919
<v Speaker 1>riled up. I love it though. Let's go ahead and

0:21:23.920 --> 0:21:26.760
<v Speaker 1>step aside and take our first break here on the

0:21:26.840 --> 0:21:29.440
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys dot Com Draft Show. When we come back,

0:21:29.440 --> 0:21:31.760
<v Speaker 1>it's time for some Twitter on the twenty. We'll answer

0:21:31.760 --> 0:21:33.600
<v Speaker 1>your fan questions. We got a ton of them over

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the last week, so this will be a ton of

0:21:35.600 --> 0:21:37.480
<v Speaker 1>fun when we come back here on the Draft Show.

0:21:39.640 --> 0:21:43.480
<v Speaker 1>There's nothing as unique as our eyes, which is why

0:21:43.640 --> 0:21:46.560
<v Speaker 1>SLOR pioneers ways to make lenses as unique as you.

0:21:47.840 --> 0:21:52.119
<v Speaker 1>Varilux but super sharp vision, essential blue for protection, I'm

0:21:52.200 --> 0:21:56.399
<v Speaker 1>Crisol for freedom from glam three cutting XE solutions in

0:21:56.480 --> 0:22:00.560
<v Speaker 1>a single unique lens. So whatever your needs, insist on

0:22:00.720 --> 0:22:04.280
<v Speaker 1>Selor visit your local selor experts and find a perfect

0:22:04.359 --> 0:22:09.160
<v Speaker 1>lens for you to seymore do Moore Slore. Since eighteen

0:22:09.280 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 1>sixty five, Stetson hats are American maid with pride right

0:22:13.160 --> 0:22:15.800
<v Speaker 1>here in Texas, and Stetson is proud to be on

0:22:15.840 --> 0:22:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the field with America's team. Want to show your Texas

0:22:18.760 --> 0:22:22.640
<v Speaker 1>and Team pride too? You can By purchasing your own Stetson,

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:24.879
<v Speaker 1>you can look just like how the flag guys do

0:22:25.000 --> 0:22:28.400
<v Speaker 1>on field at every home game. Stetson hats the official

0:22:28.440 --> 0:22:32.400
<v Speaker 1>crown of all self respecting Cowboys and your favorite football team.

0:22:32.520 --> 0:22:36.119
<v Speaker 1>Get yours today at shop dot Dallas Cowboys dot com

0:22:36.280 --> 0:22:39.400
<v Speaker 1>or at Stetson dot com. I'm Jay Novachek, former tight

0:22:39.520 --> 0:22:42.080
<v Speaker 1>end for the Dallas Cowboys. Back in the day. I

0:22:42.280 --> 0:22:44.280
<v Speaker 1>was the guy who always got the tough yards, and

0:22:44.440 --> 0:22:47.359
<v Speaker 1>that's why I run with John Deer today. In fact,

0:22:47.480 --> 0:22:49.639
<v Speaker 1>I have a John Deer three zero twenty five E

0:22:49.840 --> 0:22:52.560
<v Speaker 1>tractor that can handle any yard work I need to do,

0:22:52.840 --> 0:22:55.399
<v Speaker 1>even the tough yards way out back. So if you

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:58.119
<v Speaker 1>have one acre or a thousand, John Deer has the

0:22:58.160 --> 0:23:00.960
<v Speaker 1>equipment that's just right for you. Visit a John Dear

0:23:01.080 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 1>dealer today and run with us. We are the official

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:07.920
<v Speaker 1>tractor provider of your Dallas Cowboys. Here it's nineteen oh eight.

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Don't you think we should get electricity and stop using

0:23:11.080 --> 0:23:13.560
<v Speaker 1>candles to see it night? It's just electricity lights up

0:23:13.600 --> 0:23:16.400
<v Speaker 1>the room fast. It's more reliable than candles blowing out,

0:23:16.440 --> 0:23:20.160
<v Speaker 1>and people seem to love it nationwide. Well, candles dare,

0:23:20.240 --> 0:23:22.399
<v Speaker 1>did you just run into the wall. May I have

0:23:22.440 --> 0:23:25.240
<v Speaker 1>a new candle? Please? Historically, switching to new technology is

0:23:25.240 --> 0:23:28.800
<v Speaker 1>a no brainer. Today it's AT and T five G, fast, reliable, secure,

0:23:28.840 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 1>and nationwide. Switch to AT and T five G. It's

0:23:31.320 --> 0:23:33.840
<v Speaker 1>not complicated. Five G requires compatible plant may not be

0:23:33.840 --> 0:23:35.520
<v Speaker 1>in your area. See att dot com slash five G

0:23:35.680 --> 0:23:40.080
<v Speaker 1>for you for details. Is the Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:23:40.200 --> 0:23:48.639
<v Speaker 1>Draft Show. Onto the second segment here of the Dallas

0:23:48.640 --> 0:23:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys dot com Draft Show. Thanks for everybody tuning in

0:23:51.880 --> 0:23:54.480
<v Speaker 1>coast to coast and around the world on Dallas Cowboys

0:23:54.560 --> 0:23:58.639
<v Speaker 1>dot com. Kyle Yeomanstein Brugler, Kevin Turner, David Hellman, and

0:23:58.720 --> 0:24:08.000
<v Speaker 1>it's time now for so Twitter on the twenty Chris

0:24:08.040 --> 0:24:10.600
<v Speaker 1>Beam is always doing fantastic work with the drops in

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 1>the back. Now, Dave, I know in the first segment

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:18.280
<v Speaker 1>you told me to forget about Kyle pits. Well, I

0:24:18.320 --> 0:24:20.800
<v Speaker 1>can't do that, So I'm gonna I'm gonna throw this

0:24:20.840 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 1>out there because I got a text from our actually

0:24:24.760 --> 0:24:28.800
<v Speaker 1>a DM from Preston Dabs today early this morning, and

0:24:28.840 --> 0:24:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was a fantastic question. He said, for

0:24:30.920 --> 0:24:34.560
<v Speaker 1>argument's sake, does Kyle Pitts get this team back? To

0:24:34.800 --> 0:24:38.520
<v Speaker 1>dominating in the red zone. Should they pick him at

0:24:38.520 --> 0:24:41.879
<v Speaker 1>the tenth overall selection, because we've talked about the athleticism,

0:24:42.119 --> 0:24:44.120
<v Speaker 1>we've talked about how good of a player and how

0:24:44.359 --> 0:24:48.760
<v Speaker 1>generational of a player he could be. But offensively, you're

0:24:48.800 --> 0:24:52.720
<v Speaker 1>not looking for prospects. You want to defensive prospect there ideally, However,

0:24:53.280 --> 0:24:55.639
<v Speaker 1>is that a need because of the struggles in the

0:24:55.640 --> 0:24:58.879
<v Speaker 1>red zone? David, you know it's a bummer, because I mean,

0:24:58.920 --> 0:25:02.360
<v Speaker 1>anybody that follows my work knows that I am. I'm

0:25:02.760 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 1>captain of the Blake Jarwin pain train, and I would

0:25:05.800 --> 0:25:07.800
<v Speaker 1>have loved to have seen what the red zone offense

0:25:07.840 --> 0:25:10.639
<v Speaker 1>looked like with him in the lineup, because I really

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I thought he could have been a high volume guy

0:25:13.200 --> 0:25:16.400
<v Speaker 1>down there. I do, obviously, I think a guy as

0:25:16.480 --> 0:25:19.199
<v Speaker 1>athletic and awesome as Kyle Pitts would obviously help you.

0:25:19.680 --> 0:25:22.560
<v Speaker 1>But I do I wonder, and Dane, you can help

0:25:22.600 --> 0:25:25.520
<v Speaker 1>me figure this out. I think Kyle, you know Kyle

0:25:25.560 --> 0:25:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Pitts is he's improved as a blocker, like he can

0:25:28.640 --> 0:25:33.320
<v Speaker 1>do blocker things. But that's obviously not why you're drafting him.

0:25:33.440 --> 0:25:36.800
<v Speaker 1>But the Cowboys are like you, I don't want to

0:25:36.880 --> 0:25:39.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to get out of eleven personnel. I've

0:25:39.119 --> 0:25:44.040
<v Speaker 1>got three great wide receivers, so can I mean, if

0:25:44.119 --> 0:25:46.320
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Pitts is gonna play here, it's gonna be on

0:25:46.359 --> 0:25:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the line, even if it's not to block. Like you know,

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:51.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how much they're gonna flex him out,

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:55.320
<v Speaker 1>And I wonder would that be hampering his ability? Like

0:25:55.400 --> 0:25:57.480
<v Speaker 1>if the Cowboys played him that way, would he still

0:25:57.520 --> 0:26:02.640
<v Speaker 1>be successful if he can't you know, flex off the line? Yeah,

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:05.080
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think he'd still be successful. But are

0:26:05.119 --> 0:26:08.480
<v Speaker 1>you putting a cap on just how successful he could be? Probably,

0:26:08.680 --> 0:26:10.920
<v Speaker 1>you know, because you want part of the appeal of

0:26:11.040 --> 0:26:14.560
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Pitts is that he can line up in line,

0:26:14.680 --> 0:26:18.800
<v Speaker 1>detached out wide. I mean, you're you're looking to exploit

0:26:18.880 --> 0:26:22.120
<v Speaker 1>weaknesses in the defense with what Kyle Pitts offers. And

0:26:22.240 --> 0:26:25.560
<v Speaker 1>if you're lining them up in the same spot down in, down, out,

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:30.520
<v Speaker 1>not creating any type of mystery there for the defense

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:33.280
<v Speaker 1>about what you're doing with them, then you know, yeah,

0:26:33.320 --> 0:26:34.800
<v Speaker 1>you're you're kind of I think you're putting a cap

0:26:34.840 --> 0:26:37.960
<v Speaker 1>on just you know, what makes him so unique and

0:26:38.000 --> 0:26:42.440
<v Speaker 1>so rare. I mean, Pitts, it's a really fascinating conversation

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:44.439
<v Speaker 1>with him because he's one of the top five talents

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:47.720
<v Speaker 1>in his class. I feel confident saying that. But will

0:26:47.760 --> 0:26:49.520
<v Speaker 1>he be a top five pick, probably not. Will he

0:26:49.600 --> 0:26:53.560
<v Speaker 1>be a top ten pick maybe not. It's hard to find,

0:26:54.080 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, the exact right landing spot for him because

0:26:57.240 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 1>he's so different, he's so unique. A lot of team

0:27:00.000 --> 0:27:03.640
<v Speaker 1>aren't gonna be uh necessarily on board with that. So,

0:27:03.960 --> 0:27:05.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Cowboys, there's a good chance they could

0:27:05.760 --> 0:27:08.320
<v Speaker 1>have a shot at him at ten um. You know,

0:27:08.400 --> 0:27:11.080
<v Speaker 1>would they would they really do that? It would be

0:27:11.600 --> 0:27:15.160
<v Speaker 1>it would be a pivot from what we have come to,

0:27:15.720 --> 0:27:18.119
<v Speaker 1>you know, expect from this organization. So it would be

0:27:18.119 --> 0:27:20.520
<v Speaker 1>a surprise, But I don't think you can completely rule

0:27:20.560 --> 0:27:23.960
<v Speaker 1>it out. And to answer the question though, like what

0:27:24.080 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 1>gets you back to dominating in the red zone, it's

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:28.879
<v Speaker 1>Dak Prescott and I'll roll my dice, is that the

0:27:28.920 --> 0:27:31.080
<v Speaker 1>red zone offense is going to be pretty good if

0:27:31.160 --> 0:27:36.199
<v Speaker 1>dat doesn't get hurt last year. That's just well, one

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:39.680
<v Speaker 1>last thing on Kyle Pitts. If you want to figure

0:27:39.720 --> 0:27:42.159
<v Speaker 1>out how to use them, just watch the Raiders offense.

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:45.159
<v Speaker 1>Watch how Darren Waller is used. And that's how you

0:27:45.240 --> 0:27:47.639
<v Speaker 1>use Kyle Pitts, and you know it's it's not that

0:27:47.800 --> 0:27:51.200
<v Speaker 1>hard to you know, we shouldn't overthink it. Just watch

0:27:51.280 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 1>how the Raiders use Darren Waller use Kyle Pitts the

0:27:53.600 --> 0:27:56.200
<v Speaker 1>same way, and you got a pro bowler on your hands.

0:27:57.680 --> 0:28:00.679
<v Speaker 1>I like that idea. I'm sold pick him at ten

0:28:00.760 --> 0:28:03.240
<v Speaker 1>and figure out from there. Now, I'm just kidding. That's

0:28:03.280 --> 0:28:06.240
<v Speaker 1>not an efficient I will say, I will say, and

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:09.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm Dan obviously I think you're right, and I hope

0:28:09.880 --> 0:28:11.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not talking out of my butt here. But like

0:28:11.840 --> 0:28:16.199
<v Speaker 1>the Raiders, like John Bruden is famous for using like

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:19.479
<v Speaker 1>he uses twelve personnel a lot like he is, he

0:28:19.680 --> 0:28:22.719
<v Speaker 1>is not an eleven personnel kind of guy. And that

0:28:22.760 --> 0:28:26.159
<v Speaker 1>goes back to my point is I would love it

0:28:26.200 --> 0:28:28.439
<v Speaker 1>if they drafted Kyle Pitts. That would excite me. But

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:33.040
<v Speaker 1>at the same time, if cd Amari and Michael Gallup

0:28:33.080 --> 0:28:34.960
<v Speaker 1>are all on this team and you have a guy

0:28:35.000 --> 0:28:39.680
<v Speaker 1>like Kyle Pitts and you have Blake Jarwin coming off

0:28:39.680 --> 0:28:42.360
<v Speaker 1>his acl and Dalton Schultz had a nice season as well,

0:28:42.800 --> 0:28:45.040
<v Speaker 1>that's a lot of mouths to feed for a team

0:28:45.080 --> 0:28:48.600
<v Speaker 1>that likes to run eleven personnel. And I mean It's

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:51.120
<v Speaker 1>something that would definitely concern me, but I would call

0:28:51.120 --> 0:28:55.000
<v Speaker 1>it a good problem to have. And also a team

0:28:55.040 --> 0:28:57.280
<v Speaker 1>that has a ninety million dollar running back sitting in

0:28:57.320 --> 0:28:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the backfield should he be on the roster in twenty

0:28:59.440 --> 0:29:01.800
<v Speaker 1>twenty one as well. So, I mean there's multiple mouths

0:29:01.840 --> 0:29:03.640
<v Speaker 1>to feed whenever it talks to the offense. And we

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:06.760
<v Speaker 1>already had that conversation after Cede Lamb was selected. We

0:29:06.800 --> 0:29:09.120
<v Speaker 1>had already talked about it. And if you're adding another

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:12.520
<v Speaker 1>man to the mix, that would potentially be something that

0:29:12.840 --> 0:29:15.440
<v Speaker 1>it would be tough for an offense to deal with,

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:18.160
<v Speaker 1>even though you won as many talented guys as you

0:29:18.360 --> 0:29:23.000
<v Speaker 1>potentially could on that squad. Okay, so justin Warner ask

0:29:23.120 --> 0:29:26.400
<v Speaker 1>what position in this year's draft has the best talent

0:29:26.680 --> 0:29:30.400
<v Speaker 1>and best depth? Much like the wide receiver position last year, Dane,

0:29:33.440 --> 0:29:37.680
<v Speaker 1>I think wide receiver again is another one where it's

0:29:37.880 --> 0:29:40.719
<v Speaker 1>and it's kind of funny how similar to it is

0:29:41.320 --> 0:29:43.400
<v Speaker 1>to last year, where you know, last year we had

0:29:43.520 --> 0:29:45.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of we talked about the big three with Rugs

0:29:45.520 --> 0:29:48.760
<v Speaker 1>and Judy and Lamb, and we weren't sure what order

0:29:48.800 --> 0:29:52.080
<v Speaker 1>they were going to go in. This is kind of

0:29:52.120 --> 0:29:54.840
<v Speaker 1>similar this year. Wi Jamar Chase and Davonte Smith and

0:29:55.320 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Jaylen Waddle. You could make a case for any one

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:00.160
<v Speaker 1>of those three to be the first wide receiver off

0:30:00.200 --> 0:30:02.680
<v Speaker 1>the board. And it doesn't stop there. I can't wait

0:30:02.680 --> 0:30:05.800
<v Speaker 1>to see Crystal Lava in the National Championship game going

0:30:05.880 --> 0:30:10.479
<v Speaker 1>up against those Alabama corners. Uh, Kadarius Tony. Anybody watches uh,

0:30:10.600 --> 0:30:13.920
<v Speaker 1>you know SEC football watches Florida. They know about Kadarius Tony.

0:30:14.000 --> 0:30:16.240
<v Speaker 1>How special of an athlete he is. Um. You know,

0:30:16.320 --> 0:30:19.040
<v Speaker 1>the wide receiver position is stacked once again. And then

0:30:19.240 --> 0:30:21.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, we talked about corner and edge rusher in

0:30:21.280 --> 0:30:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the first segment. Both those positions are you know, it's

0:30:25.360 --> 0:30:28.160
<v Speaker 1>this is not a great year to you know, if

0:30:28.160 --> 0:30:30.160
<v Speaker 1>you want that elite player at the top. But there's

0:30:30.200 --> 0:30:32.800
<v Speaker 1>good value in you know, the mid first, you know

0:30:32.960 --> 0:30:35.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of rate where the Cowboys are going to be picking.

0:30:35.160 --> 0:30:37.120
<v Speaker 1>There's good value in the second and a third at

0:30:37.160 --> 0:30:40.240
<v Speaker 1>corner and edge rushers. So I think those three positions

0:30:40.280 --> 0:30:42.440
<v Speaker 1>really stand out more than others. And then one other

0:30:42.480 --> 0:30:45.320
<v Speaker 1>one I would say was tackle, And that's a that's

0:30:45.320 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 1>a good thing for a team like the Cowboys who

0:30:48.080 --> 0:30:50.400
<v Speaker 1>could look at tackle in the first round. But they

0:30:50.400 --> 0:30:52.560
<v Speaker 1>could also wait to the second or third round and

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:56.480
<v Speaker 1>get a developmental guy that they could realistically turn into

0:30:56.520 --> 0:31:01.040
<v Speaker 1>a future starter. I think about asked, I think about

0:31:01.080 --> 0:31:03.800
<v Speaker 1>past third round picks, and we've talked about, you know,

0:31:04.120 --> 0:31:08.680
<v Speaker 1>MALIEK Collins or Neville Gallimore. You know, I think there's

0:31:08.680 --> 0:31:12.240
<v Speaker 1>a few defensive tackle names that might be of interest

0:31:12.280 --> 0:31:14.720
<v Speaker 1>for them at seventy five. But I still think you

0:31:14.840 --> 0:31:19.640
<v Speaker 1>gotta think about what are you doing defensive scheme? What's

0:31:19.680 --> 0:31:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the scheme, what is your what are you doing? And

0:31:22.800 --> 0:31:25.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know that. And I think they've proven, at

0:31:25.520 --> 0:31:27.280
<v Speaker 1>least the people doing the drafting, and I know the

0:31:27.320 --> 0:31:30.240
<v Speaker 1>head coach has changed, they've proven they're not going to

0:31:30.320 --> 0:31:33.200
<v Speaker 1>invest heavy on a nose and that could change a

0:31:33.320 --> 0:31:35.640
<v Speaker 1>nose or a one technique at three hundred and twenty

0:31:35.680 --> 0:31:38.320
<v Speaker 1>five pound Maller like, they're probably not gonna do that.

0:31:38.520 --> 0:31:40.920
<v Speaker 1>But another thing that they've all also done in the past,

0:31:41.560 --> 0:31:43.760
<v Speaker 1>And I think about Chaz Green, and I think of

0:31:43.880 --> 0:31:47.160
<v Speaker 1>Connor McGregor a third round offensive tackle too, And that's

0:31:47.320 --> 0:31:49.760
<v Speaker 1>that's where I think the tackles are a position to

0:31:49.840 --> 0:31:52.480
<v Speaker 1>keep an eye on it picks seventy five tackles on

0:31:52.560 --> 0:31:55.560
<v Speaker 1>both sides of the football, because you know, I think

0:31:55.560 --> 0:31:57.360
<v Speaker 1>the more you have to look at these offensive tackles,

0:31:57.360 --> 0:32:00.280
<v Speaker 1>like Dane said, you find guys who are all we

0:32:00.320 --> 0:32:01.720
<v Speaker 1>gotta be there just because you know all I guess

0:32:01.720 --> 0:32:04.600
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna drafted tackle, but you can't see. Go Okay,

0:32:04.800 --> 0:32:06.880
<v Speaker 1>there might be a good third round guy or a

0:32:06.960 --> 0:32:09.520
<v Speaker 1>late second round, third round guy that I like. And

0:32:09.520 --> 0:32:12.400
<v Speaker 1>and I also think the defensive tackle. You know, there's

0:32:12.400 --> 0:32:15.239
<v Speaker 1>some guys I like that you might have to go

0:32:15.360 --> 0:32:20.920
<v Speaker 1>get it Pick forty four, Washington tackle LEVI on Mouzoika,

0:32:21.120 --> 0:32:22.920
<v Speaker 1>I want to make sure get close to the get

0:32:23.040 --> 0:32:25.760
<v Speaker 1>his name right now. I like him more than Let's

0:32:25.760 --> 0:32:27.320
<v Speaker 1>talk about some of the guys we were talking about

0:32:27.400 --> 0:32:29.440
<v Speaker 1>last year who might be there at pick fifty one.

0:32:29.440 --> 0:32:31.840
<v Speaker 1>We were talking about Justin Mattabek from Texas A and

0:32:31.960 --> 0:32:35.240
<v Speaker 1>M I like on Mozoique's name quite a bit more

0:32:35.280 --> 0:32:40.400
<v Speaker 1>than that. M J twofele of of usc is a

0:32:40.400 --> 0:32:43.520
<v Speaker 1>powerful player who can you know he would play the

0:32:43.560 --> 0:32:46.320
<v Speaker 1>one technique if you were running a four to three here,

0:32:46.640 --> 0:32:50.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that would be his position. You know, maybe

0:32:50.120 --> 0:32:52.360
<v Speaker 1>he slips into the third round, and maybe that's a

0:32:52.400 --> 0:32:54.680
<v Speaker 1>guy who would be of interest and I like the

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:58.600
<v Speaker 1>idea of that, but he had just gotta learn a

0:32:58.680 --> 0:33:02.360
<v Speaker 1>little bit more about what the heck this team plans

0:33:02.400 --> 0:33:05.040
<v Speaker 1>to do on defense next year. And I hope those

0:33:05.040 --> 0:33:07.280
<v Speaker 1>decisions are being made. I hope they're having meetings right

0:33:07.320 --> 0:33:11.360
<v Speaker 1>now and getting close to making decisions because other teams

0:33:11.480 --> 0:33:14.200
<v Speaker 1>are making these decisions and they're going to be picking

0:33:14.200 --> 0:33:16.400
<v Speaker 1>their defensive coordinators. Is gonna be knowing what they're doing,

0:33:16.880 --> 0:33:19.200
<v Speaker 1>and the faster you get on it, I think they

0:33:19.320 --> 0:33:23.920
<v Speaker 1>better haven't been to that point yet. And Scott fitz

0:33:23.960 --> 0:33:27.280
<v Speaker 1>and our guy Alan both asked about it was some

0:33:27.320 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 1>of the names that defensive tackles. So Katie, I'm glad

0:33:29.720 --> 0:33:31.400
<v Speaker 1>you kind of went through that a little bit. Now.

0:33:31.920 --> 0:33:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Jason Davis asked on Twitter and he said, what quarterbacks

0:33:35.760 --> 0:33:38.320
<v Speaker 1>later in the draft have the potential to be a

0:33:38.360 --> 0:33:40.960
<v Speaker 1>future starter. Now, I kind of want to preface this

0:33:41.040 --> 0:33:43.080
<v Speaker 1>by saying, of course, this goes away from the Cowboys

0:33:43.120 --> 0:33:45.600
<v Speaker 1>a little bit, but does it really because there's still

0:33:45.640 --> 0:33:48.960
<v Speaker 1>an opportunity to draft a late round quarterback. Dane. I

0:33:49.000 --> 0:33:51.280
<v Speaker 1>know we talk about Ben da Nucci last year, but

0:33:51.320 --> 0:33:53.160
<v Speaker 1>we saw what Ben da Nucci brought to the table

0:33:53.400 --> 0:33:56.720
<v Speaker 1>in a tough situation against Philadelphia in Week eight. However,

0:33:56.920 --> 0:33:59.840
<v Speaker 1>there's I think still a chance that you pick a quarterback.

0:33:59.840 --> 0:34:02.760
<v Speaker 1>Is there anybody that sticks out to you that could

0:34:02.800 --> 0:34:06.480
<v Speaker 1>potentially be a starter somewhere down the road. A guy

0:34:06.520 --> 0:34:09.000
<v Speaker 1>that I really like, and it's hard to figure out

0:34:09.040 --> 0:34:11.120
<v Speaker 1>exactly where he's going to get drafted right now, but

0:34:11.280 --> 0:34:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Davis Mills from Stanford, who is a former five star

0:34:16.320 --> 0:34:20.200
<v Speaker 1>guy who just never quite lived up to it at Stanford.

0:34:20.440 --> 0:34:22.719
<v Speaker 1>But the traits are there, and so give me the

0:34:22.719 --> 0:34:24.799
<v Speaker 1>guy with the traits and let's try and figure them

0:34:24.800 --> 0:34:28.520
<v Speaker 1>out and see what we have. So I don't know

0:34:28.560 --> 0:34:31.200
<v Speaker 1>where he's gonna be drafted. It's probably somewhere on day three,

0:34:31.360 --> 0:34:33.520
<v Speaker 1>is my guests. But all I know is I really

0:34:33.560 --> 0:34:36.359
<v Speaker 1>like the raw talent and I would love to bring

0:34:36.400 --> 0:34:40.000
<v Speaker 1>him into my quarterback room and try and develop them.

0:34:40.680 --> 0:34:42.480
<v Speaker 1>I just want to add in the quarterback is my

0:34:42.600 --> 0:34:45.600
<v Speaker 1>least favorite position to watch, so I really hope they

0:34:45.640 --> 0:34:47.960
<v Speaker 1>get a deal done with Dak and I would just

0:34:48.040 --> 0:34:50.920
<v Speaker 1>like to just push back. I like doing quarterbacks last,

0:34:51.000 --> 0:34:53.160
<v Speaker 1>if at all possible. I couldn't really do that this

0:34:53.239 --> 0:34:56.200
<v Speaker 1>year with the four guys and having a top ten pick,

0:34:56.239 --> 0:35:00.279
<v Speaker 1>But man, I really love doing quarterbacks in February, worry

0:35:00.280 --> 0:35:02.440
<v Speaker 1>in March, and pushing it back as far as possible.

0:35:02.520 --> 0:35:04.759
<v Speaker 1>So sign Deck, it's the right thing to do. I

0:35:04.800 --> 0:35:07.600
<v Speaker 1>just want to throw in like, and I mean, we

0:35:07.600 --> 0:35:10.120
<v Speaker 1>were going to talk about every position at every level

0:35:10.160 --> 0:35:13.240
<v Speaker 1>of the draft, but like kind of an unfair question,

0:35:13.480 --> 0:35:16.200
<v Speaker 1>isn't it like how many a little bit, how many

0:35:16.280 --> 0:35:19.480
<v Speaker 1>starting quarterbacks in the NFL were found outside the top

0:35:19.560 --> 0:35:23.279
<v Speaker 1>thirty five. It's like it's like Dak Russell Wilson and

0:35:23.400 --> 0:35:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Gardner Minshew and Gardner Minshew's not even the long term answer.

0:35:27.320 --> 0:35:31.760
<v Speaker 1>So I don't I'm sorry, only the only the best

0:35:31.760 --> 0:35:35.680
<v Speaker 1>of all times, right in my bad Yeah, I guess so,

0:35:35.840 --> 0:35:38.719
<v Speaker 1>I mean, no, you are right, You are right. It

0:35:39.000 --> 0:35:43.200
<v Speaker 1>is RAF teams. If teams knew these guys were we're

0:35:43.239 --> 0:35:46.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna be that caliber, they wouldn't last to the point

0:35:46.080 --> 0:35:49.120
<v Speaker 1>that they do. I will say, I just I feel

0:35:49.120 --> 0:35:51.120
<v Speaker 1>it in my bones. I don't know if he'll ever

0:35:51.239 --> 0:35:54.480
<v Speaker 1>be a starter starter, Like, I don't know if he'll

0:35:54.480 --> 0:35:58.840
<v Speaker 1>ever be somebody's franchise quarterback. But Ian Book just strikes

0:35:58.840 --> 0:36:00.440
<v Speaker 1>me as the type of guy who's going to kick

0:36:00.440 --> 0:36:04.280
<v Speaker 1>around the NFL for a long time. As like a backup,

0:36:04.360 --> 0:36:07.759
<v Speaker 1>like a Mason Rudolph type. That's like, maybe you're not

0:36:07.800 --> 0:36:09.880
<v Speaker 1>excited if he ever has to start for you, but

0:36:10.040 --> 0:36:12.440
<v Speaker 1>he'll be somebody's backup for a long time. He just

0:36:12.480 --> 0:36:15.520
<v Speaker 1>strikes me as that kind of guy. I feel that

0:36:15.520 --> 0:36:18.680
<v Speaker 1>way about Sam Ellinger, Obviously, I don't. I don't feel

0:36:18.719 --> 0:36:21.160
<v Speaker 1>that way about Ellinger at all. I'm not convinced he

0:36:21.280 --> 0:36:24.799
<v Speaker 1>can play quarterback at at the next level. See I

0:36:24.840 --> 0:36:27.359
<v Speaker 1>think he could well. And the fun thing about this

0:36:27.400 --> 0:36:29.440
<v Speaker 1>is both of those guys are going to be at

0:36:29.440 --> 0:36:32.520
<v Speaker 1>the Senior Bowl. There's six executed quarterback invites at the

0:36:32.560 --> 0:36:35.919
<v Speaker 1>Senior Bowl. Phelippe Franks from Arkansas Ian book from Notre Dame,

0:36:36.000 --> 0:36:38.840
<v Speaker 1>Sam Ellinger from Texas Texas A and M's Kellen Mond,

0:36:39.120 --> 0:36:41.640
<v Speaker 1>who I'm excited to kind of scout a little bit

0:36:41.640 --> 0:36:45.000
<v Speaker 1>more up close. Jamie Newman, who was a Georgia transfer

0:36:45.040 --> 0:36:46.799
<v Speaker 1>it to Wake Forest and he opted out of the

0:36:46.840 --> 0:36:49.719
<v Speaker 1>twenty season. And then Kyle Trask, who of course was

0:36:49.760 --> 0:36:52.840
<v Speaker 1>a Heisman finalist. Those are the six quarterbacks. Real quick, Dane,

0:36:53.000 --> 0:36:55.719
<v Speaker 1>what do you what do you think about Trask? Because

0:36:56.680 --> 0:36:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was crazy that people were trying to

0:36:59.000 --> 0:37:02.560
<v Speaker 1>peg him as a first round pick. I know, I

0:37:02.600 --> 0:37:05.240
<v Speaker 1>know he had a great season, but like I never

0:37:05.520 --> 0:37:08.200
<v Speaker 1>even before Florida has started losing, I never thought he

0:37:08.280 --> 0:37:12.640
<v Speaker 1>was like a Heisman caliber quarterback. But if you draft

0:37:12.719 --> 0:37:14.960
<v Speaker 1>him in the third or I don't know, maybe the

0:37:15.000 --> 0:37:17.560
<v Speaker 1>fourth round, like you probably feel pretty good about that. Right,

0:37:19.600 --> 0:37:23.399
<v Speaker 1>he is a Mason Rudolph clone. To me, I think

0:37:23.440 --> 0:37:26.680
<v Speaker 1>he is. He is Mason Rudolph. He is a sturdy,

0:37:26.760 --> 0:37:30.319
<v Speaker 1>well built passer who has a good arm, not an

0:37:30.320 --> 0:37:33.360
<v Speaker 1>elite arm, a good arm, but you know there's a

0:37:33.360 --> 0:37:37.000
<v Speaker 1>lot of His average mobility is something I really worry about.

0:37:37.560 --> 0:37:41.160
<v Speaker 1>You know, his accuracy is okay, but it can't be

0:37:41.200 --> 0:37:44.359
<v Speaker 1>described as pinpoint the you know, if he doesn't use

0:37:44.360 --> 0:37:48.160
<v Speaker 1>proper mechanics, his ball just lose his life and just drags.

0:37:48.520 --> 0:37:51.680
<v Speaker 1>So I think Kyle Trask is a well built, a

0:37:51.880 --> 0:37:56.840
<v Speaker 1>smart and tough competitor. He has natural touch as a passer,

0:37:57.239 --> 0:38:00.839
<v Speaker 1>but the inconsistent mechanics, the below average mobile that just

0:38:00.880 --> 0:38:04.360
<v Speaker 1>puts a cap on his ceiling as an NFL passer.

0:38:04.520 --> 0:38:07.040
<v Speaker 1>So I see a Mason Rudolph and that's meant to

0:38:07.080 --> 0:38:11.439
<v Speaker 1>be both a good and bad thing. So now we've

0:38:11.480 --> 0:38:14.440
<v Speaker 1>got to we out of everything we've talked about today,

0:38:14.480 --> 0:38:17.480
<v Speaker 1>we do know for certain we're fifty percent chance from

0:38:17.480 --> 0:38:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the Senior Bowl quarterbacks of finding Mason Rudolph. Thank goodness,

0:38:20.600 --> 0:38:22.759
<v Speaker 1>We've got three guys that could potentially get to that

0:38:22.800 --> 0:38:26.640
<v Speaker 1>point and find a Mason Rudolph. Now, Katie, I've got

0:38:26.680 --> 0:38:29.040
<v Speaker 1>a question for you. This comes from JR. Young and

0:38:29.239 --> 0:38:32.720
<v Speaker 1>he asked, what is the number one position of need

0:38:33.160 --> 0:38:34.839
<v Speaker 1>for the Cowboys? And I know you kind of talked

0:38:34.840 --> 0:38:37.120
<v Speaker 1>about the run defense and we've talked about corner and stuff,

0:38:37.120 --> 0:38:40.160
<v Speaker 1>But if you had to pinpointed number one on the board,

0:38:40.520 --> 0:38:43.680
<v Speaker 1>which would it be for the Cowboys going into this offseason?

0:38:44.120 --> 0:38:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I just I think you have to cover. You have

0:38:46.760 --> 0:38:51.000
<v Speaker 1>to cover, So cornerback would be where I'm at. And

0:38:51.040 --> 0:38:54.600
<v Speaker 1>if Anthony Brown can be my cornerback flour next year,

0:38:54.680 --> 0:38:57.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm happy. That's what I want, you know, So cornerback.

0:38:57.920 --> 0:39:00.600
<v Speaker 1>I know people have been, you know, wanting to say forever.

0:39:00.920 --> 0:39:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I want to add to safety as well. Um, but

0:39:05.719 --> 0:39:08.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think I think defensive tackle. You look

0:39:08.640 --> 0:39:11.160
<v Speaker 1>at yourself and you go, is Tristan Hill as a

0:39:11.200 --> 0:39:14.520
<v Speaker 1>starting defensive tackle for me next year? And then who

0:39:14.920 --> 0:39:19.480
<v Speaker 1>Antoine Woods? Let me do that again? Great guy. Want

0:39:19.560 --> 0:39:21.640
<v Speaker 1>him on my roster? Do I want my starters to

0:39:21.680 --> 0:39:24.640
<v Speaker 1>be Antoine Woods and and Tristan Hill? You know, I

0:39:24.719 --> 0:39:26.879
<v Speaker 1>know a free agency maybe there's talk of maybe they

0:39:26.920 --> 0:39:30.200
<v Speaker 1>bring back Gerald McCoy if they can. But a defensive

0:39:30.239 --> 0:39:33.840
<v Speaker 1>tackle is a problem. This team has shown they can't

0:39:33.880 --> 0:39:38.040
<v Speaker 1>stop the run. Um that it's it's quarterbacking defensive tackle

0:39:38.120 --> 0:39:40.200
<v Speaker 1>for me, and it's it's very clear. And you know what,

0:39:40.640 --> 0:39:43.640
<v Speaker 1>I'll put linebacker at three there if they do what

0:39:43.760 --> 0:39:48.280
<v Speaker 1>they probably should do post June one, cut Jalen Smith

0:39:48.320 --> 0:39:51.320
<v Speaker 1>and kind of start over there as well. And building

0:39:51.400 --> 0:39:54.160
<v Speaker 1>block being a building block around a Layton vander esh

0:39:54.320 --> 0:40:00.000
<v Speaker 1>So quarterbacking dteam. Man, I like it. I think that's

0:40:00.239 --> 0:40:02.360
<v Speaker 1>that's where the Cowboys need to start day. Do you agree?

0:40:02.400 --> 0:40:04.799
<v Speaker 1>I definitely. I mean I think it's cornerback and then

0:40:04.840 --> 0:40:07.360
<v Speaker 1>you fill in the rest however you want, honestly, and

0:40:07.719 --> 0:40:11.399
<v Speaker 1>that I mean again this conversational change, because even though

0:40:11.440 --> 0:40:14.040
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys don't love to spend in free agency, they're

0:40:14.080 --> 0:40:15.920
<v Speaker 1>still I mean, they're gonna you know, they add free

0:40:15.960 --> 0:40:20.200
<v Speaker 1>agents every year. They will this year too. I don't

0:40:20.239 --> 0:40:23.040
<v Speaker 1>feel like I'm in love with my options at safety.

0:40:23.160 --> 0:40:26.160
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I just haven't dug into that position enough yet.

0:40:26.719 --> 0:40:29.879
<v Speaker 1>But this they you know, they need at least one

0:40:30.000 --> 0:40:33.640
<v Speaker 1>starting caliber cornerback out of this draft class in my opinion,

0:40:33.719 --> 0:40:36.080
<v Speaker 1>which is like I mean, if I had to guess

0:40:36.200 --> 0:40:39.120
<v Speaker 1>right now, I just think it makes way too much

0:40:39.160 --> 0:40:41.279
<v Speaker 1>sense for that number ten overall pick to be one

0:40:41.280 --> 0:40:44.839
<v Speaker 1>of those cornerbacks. So yeah, no, I agree, And then

0:40:44.880 --> 0:40:46.799
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you can fill in the rest however you want.

0:40:46.880 --> 0:40:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I I agree with everything Katie said. It just depends

0:40:51.560 --> 0:40:53.520
<v Speaker 1>on how they want to play it. Like will Jalen

0:40:53.560 --> 0:40:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Smith be part of their plans? I have no idea. Yeah,

0:40:57.239 --> 0:40:59.680
<v Speaker 1>it is it crazy on my side to think that

0:40:59.760 --> 0:41:02.839
<v Speaker 1>defensive tackle is more of a specific need. I'm not

0:41:02.880 --> 0:41:06.200
<v Speaker 1>saying draft one at ten. I think corner has to

0:41:06.239 --> 0:41:08.640
<v Speaker 1>be the pick at ten or at least somebody that's

0:41:08.680 --> 0:41:10.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be a starter, game changer type of talent,

0:41:10.719 --> 0:41:12.560
<v Speaker 1>and I don't think there's a defensive tackle at ten

0:41:12.680 --> 0:41:14.560
<v Speaker 1>that could do that. But just in the fact of

0:41:14.600 --> 0:41:17.640
<v Speaker 1>the run game, I mean, the corners weren't the fact

0:41:17.640 --> 0:41:19.480
<v Speaker 1>that you couldn't stop the run. It was your defensive

0:41:19.480 --> 0:41:22.040
<v Speaker 1>tackles and it was your linebackers. So for some reason,

0:41:22.480 --> 0:41:26.080
<v Speaker 1>I put in terms of needs and just based on

0:41:26.600 --> 0:41:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys, not not even looking at the draft class,

0:41:29.560 --> 0:41:32.920
<v Speaker 1>I would put defensive tackle just slightly above corner because

0:41:32.960 --> 0:41:35.799
<v Speaker 1>I think, like Katsy said earlier, you feel good about

0:41:35.840 --> 0:41:38.799
<v Speaker 1>Treyvon Diggs, you feel good about Anthony Brown being a

0:41:38.840 --> 0:41:41.040
<v Speaker 1>guy that you could bring back and be a starter.

0:41:41.120 --> 0:41:43.680
<v Speaker 1>But is it crazy for me to put defensive tackle

0:41:44.000 --> 0:41:46.880
<v Speaker 1>in front of corner, even though I know Corner's probably

0:41:47.080 --> 0:41:50.239
<v Speaker 1>the more likely and more logical first round pick. I

0:41:50.280 --> 0:41:52.000
<v Speaker 1>don't think. I don't think it's crazy. I think the

0:41:52.040 --> 0:41:56.719
<v Speaker 1>answer to the answer to the question is defense. That's true.

0:41:56.760 --> 0:41:59.680
<v Speaker 1>I think I could make a really strong argument for

0:42:00.120 --> 0:42:03.359
<v Speaker 1>every single position on defense. I mean, I think that

0:42:04.000 --> 0:42:07.239
<v Speaker 1>there is not a clear cut answer here. I mean,

0:42:07.280 --> 0:42:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I agree with you, you could make a case that

0:42:09.440 --> 0:42:11.480
<v Speaker 1>it's defensive tackle, but I think I can also make

0:42:11.680 --> 0:42:14.239
<v Speaker 1>a really strong case as linebacker. And you know it,

0:42:14.520 --> 0:42:17.439
<v Speaker 1>there's there's so many And that's why I don't think,

0:42:17.520 --> 0:42:20.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, fans should be too upset about which direction

0:42:20.719 --> 0:42:23.480
<v Speaker 1>they go here because they need help everywhere and it's

0:42:23.520 --> 0:42:26.200
<v Speaker 1>not just a plug in play and okay, now we're

0:42:26.239 --> 0:42:29.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna be a top ten defense. They need help everywhere,

0:42:29.200 --> 0:42:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and maybe free agency will kind of tip their hand

0:42:31.640 --> 0:42:35.719
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. I like it. I mean, we're gonna

0:42:35.719 --> 0:42:38.160
<v Speaker 1>fix this team by the time we're done with this,

0:42:37.920 --> 0:42:40.239
<v Speaker 1>uh this draft show. We're gonna find a way to

0:42:40.880 --> 0:42:44.319
<v Speaker 1>win some games with the defense. By the time we're done,

0:42:44.360 --> 0:42:46.560
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna we're gonna set the roadmap for the front

0:42:46.600 --> 0:42:48.839
<v Speaker 1>office to get the job done in April. But when

0:42:48.840 --> 0:42:50.880
<v Speaker 1>we come back, the roadmap in terms of the college

0:42:50.880 --> 0:42:53.719
<v Speaker 1>football season comes to a close coming up this week

0:42:53.800 --> 0:42:58.360
<v Speaker 1>as the National Championship between Alabama and Ohio State is

0:42:58.400 --> 0:43:01.239
<v Speaker 1>on the docket. We're gonna preview the draft prospects in

0:43:01.280 --> 0:43:03.960
<v Speaker 1>that game and maybe have some question marks about these

0:43:03.960 --> 0:43:06.280
<v Speaker 1>bowl games when we return here on the Dallas Cowboys

0:43:06.280 --> 0:43:10.279
<v Speaker 1>dot Com drafts you, we're backing in a tasty treat

0:43:10.320 --> 0:43:13.840
<v Speaker 1>that's sweeping airwaves and taste buds. It's new Doctor Pepper

0:43:13.840 --> 0:43:16.920
<v Speaker 1>and Cream Soda. Let's take a listen, Doctor Pepper and

0:43:17.000 --> 0:43:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Cream Soda. Is he a new Combonelet's music to my ears? Okay,

0:43:26.840 --> 0:43:34.719
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Pepper time, music to my ears and mouth. New

0:43:34.760 --> 0:43:39.919
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Pepper and Cream Soda a delicious There's nothing as

0:43:40.000 --> 0:43:44.200
<v Speaker 1>unique as our eyes, which is why SLOR Pioneers weighs

0:43:44.239 --> 0:43:48.200
<v Speaker 1>to make lenses as unique as you. Varilux for super

0:43:48.200 --> 0:43:52.720
<v Speaker 1>sharp vision, Essential Blue for protection, and Crisol for freedom

0:43:52.760 --> 0:43:57.040
<v Speaker 1>from glare. Three cutting ex solutions in a single unique lens.

0:43:57.800 --> 0:44:01.440
<v Speaker 1>So whatever your needs, insist on Lord this, leave your

0:44:01.480 --> 0:44:04.120
<v Speaker 1>local essel or experts and find a perfect lens for

0:44:04.160 --> 0:44:09.879
<v Speaker 1>you to see more, Do more, Lord. The Cowboys Way,

0:44:10.320 --> 0:44:13.799
<v Speaker 1>where sixteen Hall of Famers and five championships shows us

0:44:13.800 --> 0:44:17.160
<v Speaker 1>what success looks like. Where Turkey is always the second

0:44:17.160 --> 0:44:20.400
<v Speaker 1>best part of Thanksgiving Day, Where we are all defined

0:44:20.400 --> 0:44:24.560
<v Speaker 1>by one single thing, the Star, where we as fans

0:44:24.640 --> 0:44:27.640
<v Speaker 1>know it's our job to keep the tradition going. Bank

0:44:27.680 --> 0:44:29.759
<v Speaker 1>of America is proud to be the official bank of

0:44:29.800 --> 0:44:32.880
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas Cowboys and to support the quest of living life.

0:44:33.120 --> 0:44:37.279
<v Speaker 1>The Cowboys Way Copyright twenty twenty Bank of America Corporation. Dear,

0:44:37.400 --> 0:44:39.759
<v Speaker 1>it's nineteen oh eight. Don't you think we should get

0:44:39.800 --> 0:44:42.920
<v Speaker 1>electricity and stop using candles to see it night? It's

0:44:42.920 --> 0:44:45.920
<v Speaker 1>just electricity lights up the room fast, It's more reliable

0:44:45.920 --> 0:44:50.759
<v Speaker 1>than candles blowing out, and people seem to love it nationwide. Candles, Dear,

0:44:50.880 --> 0:44:53.120
<v Speaker 1>did you just run into the wall? I have a

0:44:53.160 --> 0:44:55.960
<v Speaker 1>new candle, please, Historically, switching to new technology is a

0:44:56.000 --> 0:44:59.440
<v Speaker 1>no brainer. Today it's AT and T five G fast, reliable, secure,

0:44:59.480 --> 0:45:01.759
<v Speaker 1>and nation wide. Switch to AT and T five GET.

0:45:01.800 --> 0:45:04.400
<v Speaker 1>It's not complicated. Five GET requires compatible plan may not

0:45:04.400 --> 0:45:06.080
<v Speaker 1>be in your area. See att dot com slash five

0:45:06.120 --> 0:45:10.520
<v Speaker 1>G for you for details. Is the Dallas Cowboys dot

0:45:10.520 --> 0:45:19.799
<v Speaker 1>com Draft Show. Segment here of the Dallas Cowboys dot

0:45:19.840 --> 0:45:23.040
<v Speaker 1>Com Draft Show. Glad you're with us, Kyle Yeoman's Dame Brugler,

0:45:23.120 --> 0:45:27.560
<v Speaker 1>David Hellman, and we've got Kevin kt Turner rocking it

0:45:27.800 --> 0:45:31.240
<v Speaker 1>from the studios. I don't even know if I'm allowed

0:45:31.280 --> 0:45:33.600
<v Speaker 1>to say that the studios and what you're at, but

0:45:33.640 --> 0:45:35.400
<v Speaker 1>at your office and it looks really nice. I like

0:45:35.480 --> 0:45:38.160
<v Speaker 1>it back there. iHeartRadio. I'll say it anyways. Who cares

0:45:38.560 --> 0:45:43.919
<v Speaker 1>the iHeartRadio studios. Now, we do have a championship game

0:45:44.000 --> 0:45:47.000
<v Speaker 1>to preview, gentlemen, and I think this is exciting one

0:45:47.080 --> 0:45:48.640
<v Speaker 1>because I think it's going to be a pretty darn

0:45:48.719 --> 0:45:51.400
<v Speaker 1>good game. And secondly, there are a lot of draft

0:45:51.440 --> 0:45:55.239
<v Speaker 1>prospects that people are going to get a firsthand opportunity

0:45:55.280 --> 0:45:58.120
<v Speaker 1>to watch and do it up against great competition. And

0:45:58.920 --> 0:46:00.839
<v Speaker 1>if we look back, let's just look at last year,

0:46:00.920 --> 0:46:04.440
<v Speaker 1>specifically with LSU and Clemson. I know that's good memories

0:46:04.480 --> 0:46:06.880
<v Speaker 1>for our friend mister David Helman over here because of

0:46:07.160 --> 0:46:10.040
<v Speaker 1>LSU season here in twenty twenty. Not to bring bad

0:46:10.080 --> 0:46:14.000
<v Speaker 1>memories into the freight here, but you know, there were

0:46:14.040 --> 0:46:17.320
<v Speaker 1>what there was like twenty one drafted players or something.

0:46:17.360 --> 0:46:20.080
<v Speaker 1>It was like a crazy number of drafted players, a

0:46:20.080 --> 0:46:31.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of them some legitimate players in this upcoming championship

0:46:32.080 --> 0:46:34.600
<v Speaker 1>game that the Cowboys could find a way to do

0:46:35.239 --> 0:46:39.520
<v Speaker 1>later on, Dane, Yeah, here, let Dave, let me ask

0:46:39.520 --> 0:46:42.040
<v Speaker 1>you a question. How many over the last five years,

0:46:42.080 --> 0:46:44.920
<v Speaker 1>how many draft picks do you think Alabama and Ohio

0:46:44.960 --> 0:46:49.080
<v Speaker 1>State have combined to produce what would be your total

0:46:49.360 --> 0:46:52.440
<v Speaker 1>throw total? Yeah, a lot between But Jane, just those

0:46:52.480 --> 0:46:55.240
<v Speaker 1>two programs the last five years, what would you God,

0:46:55.480 --> 0:47:02.319
<v Speaker 1>so they're probably averaging like six per program, averaging um

0:47:02.640 --> 0:47:06.080
<v Speaker 1>between so six per program over five years. So and

0:47:06.480 --> 0:47:09.319
<v Speaker 1>so I mean probably about sixty five if I had

0:47:09.320 --> 0:47:14.640
<v Speaker 1>to guess, you're saying first rounders. No, no, just total

0:47:14.719 --> 0:47:21.759
<v Speaker 1>draft picks one holy so, oh my gosh, hold the

0:47:21.800 --> 0:47:25.520
<v Speaker 1>hell out of that. Okay, well, it's by far the most,

0:47:25.600 --> 0:47:27.800
<v Speaker 1>the two most or the two programs that have produced

0:47:27.840 --> 0:47:31.120
<v Speaker 1>the most LSU by the way, number three. Um, so

0:47:31.840 --> 0:47:34.359
<v Speaker 1>it's look, it's gonna be the same on Monday night,

0:47:34.640 --> 0:47:36.640
<v Speaker 1>It's gonna be you know, we don't know what the

0:47:36.719 --> 0:47:39.000
<v Speaker 1>draft process is gonna look like. So for a lot

0:47:39.040 --> 0:47:42.120
<v Speaker 1>of these guys, the combine it starts Monday night. You know,

0:47:42.280 --> 0:47:45.640
<v Speaker 1>it's time to show what what's gonna you know, in

0:47:45.800 --> 0:47:48.600
<v Speaker 1>all NFL ees gonna be glued on this game. Um.

0:47:48.640 --> 0:47:50.759
<v Speaker 1>You know, for say Chris o Lava, you know, how

0:47:50.800 --> 0:47:52.680
<v Speaker 1>are you going to match up against Patrick's or Tan

0:47:52.800 --> 0:47:56.040
<v Speaker 1>or Josh Joe? Uh, if you're Wyatt Davis or Josh

0:47:56.080 --> 0:47:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Myers Ohio State right guard and center, how are you

0:47:58.960 --> 0:48:01.800
<v Speaker 1>going to match up against Chris Barmore? And Christian Barmore

0:48:01.920 --> 0:48:03.759
<v Speaker 1>is a chance to really help himself in this game.

0:48:03.920 --> 0:48:06.040
<v Speaker 1>We've seen it in the past from these Alabama defensive

0:48:06.080 --> 0:48:10.880
<v Speaker 1>tackles Marcel Darius to Ron Payne. These guys have emerged

0:48:11.120 --> 0:48:17.400
<v Speaker 1>from the playoffs as legit top fifteen type of you know,

0:48:17.400 --> 0:48:19.839
<v Speaker 1>we knew they were talented, but they really emerged as

0:48:19.880 --> 0:48:22.719
<v Speaker 1>the top half of Round one guys. Christian Barmore could

0:48:22.719 --> 0:48:25.759
<v Speaker 1>do the same thing. This draft is just dying for

0:48:25.880 --> 0:48:28.319
<v Speaker 1>a defensive tackle to say, hey, take me in the

0:48:28.360 --> 0:48:31.520
<v Speaker 1>top twenty. Barmore could be that guy this year with

0:48:31.520 --> 0:48:34.359
<v Speaker 1>another strong performance. He's really heating up. So I mean,

0:48:34.400 --> 0:48:37.240
<v Speaker 1>we could go on and on about all the players

0:48:37.239 --> 0:48:41.080
<v Speaker 1>in this game because it's never ending. For me though,

0:48:41.160 --> 0:48:44.759
<v Speaker 1>Justin Fields, I cannot wait to see how he performs

0:48:44.840 --> 0:48:47.920
<v Speaker 1>after what he did against Clemson, the best game of

0:48:47.960 --> 0:48:50.880
<v Speaker 1>his life, and it just it was so contrary to

0:48:50.960 --> 0:48:53.759
<v Speaker 1>what we've seen earlier this year. You know, when he

0:48:53.840 --> 0:48:57.640
<v Speaker 1>faced tough defenses during the regular season, whether it's Indiana, Northwestern,

0:48:57.880 --> 0:48:59.680
<v Speaker 1>even the Michigan State gave him a little bit of

0:48:59.719 --> 0:49:03.239
<v Speaker 1>a trouble. He struggled a little bit in those games.

0:49:03.239 --> 0:49:06.759
<v Speaker 1>But against Clemson he was locked in. He was precise

0:49:07.160 --> 0:49:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the toughness. I don't know if I could use any

0:49:09.560 --> 0:49:12.440
<v Speaker 1>words to really, uh, you know, describe how tough he

0:49:12.520 --> 0:49:14.640
<v Speaker 1>was in that game. How is he going to match

0:49:14.719 --> 0:49:18.600
<v Speaker 1>up against an Alabama defense that is better than Clemson's

0:49:18.680 --> 0:49:21.759
<v Speaker 1>and knowing that, you know, with all due respect to

0:49:21.760 --> 0:49:24.480
<v Speaker 1>the Ohio State secondary, Alabama is going to put up

0:49:24.520 --> 0:49:26.400
<v Speaker 1>points and so it's gonna be up to Justin Fields

0:49:26.400 --> 0:49:30.080
<v Speaker 1>and that offense to continue to tack on and match

0:49:30.160 --> 0:49:33.120
<v Speaker 1>point point per point. The over under is crazy on

0:49:33.120 --> 0:49:35.480
<v Speaker 1>this game. It's like what in the mid seventies, So

0:49:35.719 --> 0:49:37.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, they're they're they're expecting a lot of points

0:49:37.600 --> 0:49:39.000
<v Speaker 1>and I don't I don't think they're wrong. I mean

0:49:39.000 --> 0:49:43.560
<v Speaker 1>it's like a it's a like a big twelve type

0:49:43.560 --> 0:49:46.480
<v Speaker 1>of line for the National title game against Alabama and

0:49:46.480 --> 0:49:50.160
<v Speaker 1>Ohio State, which is just crazy. But uh, there's no

0:49:50.200 --> 0:49:52.799
<v Speaker 1>shortage of players in this drag and in this game

0:49:52.880 --> 0:49:55.600
<v Speaker 1>that scouts to be glued glued on and I think

0:49:55.640 --> 0:49:58.480
<v Speaker 1>justin fields. Uh, you know, he's kind of leading that,

0:49:58.600 --> 0:50:00.799
<v Speaker 1>but it doesn't stop there. I mean, Trey Sermon with

0:50:00.800 --> 0:50:02.920
<v Speaker 1>what he's done at running back the last few games

0:50:02.920 --> 0:50:07.440
<v Speaker 1>has been remarkable. Former Oklahoma transfer on the Alabama side,

0:50:08.239 --> 0:50:11.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, really eager to see what you know on

0:50:11.280 --> 0:50:16.200
<v Speaker 1>the offensive line, Leatherwood and Deonte Brown, what can they do?

0:50:16.719 --> 0:50:19.600
<v Speaker 1>Sean Waite, can he do anything? Ohio State corner? Can

0:50:19.600 --> 0:50:22.080
<v Speaker 1>he do anything to kind of keep his head above

0:50:22.120 --> 0:50:25.200
<v Speaker 1>water as an outside corner against DeVante Smith and maybe

0:50:25.280 --> 0:50:27.880
<v Speaker 1>Jalen Waddle. We'll see if he plays. So you know,

0:50:27.880 --> 0:50:29.440
<v Speaker 1>we can go on and on. There's just so many

0:50:29.600 --> 0:50:32.520
<v Speaker 1>future NFL players on the State on this big stage

0:50:32.719 --> 0:50:35.600
<v Speaker 1>that NFL teams are going to be really really interested

0:50:35.600 --> 0:50:37.840
<v Speaker 1>to watch and see how they perform, because, let's be honest,

0:50:38.400 --> 0:50:41.760
<v Speaker 1>body of work matters, but if you give an NFL

0:50:41.800 --> 0:50:44.680
<v Speaker 1>scout truth serum, they'll tell you how they perform on

0:50:44.680 --> 0:50:47.800
<v Speaker 1>the big stage. That carries a little bit more weight.

0:50:47.960 --> 0:50:50.759
<v Speaker 1>And so it's really going to be important for these

0:50:50.800 --> 0:50:53.400
<v Speaker 1>players to step up and show out when it matters

0:50:53.400 --> 0:50:57.919
<v Speaker 1>the most. And we talked, or you mentioned a second

0:50:57.920 --> 0:51:00.759
<v Speaker 1>ago about Jaylen Waddle and how he can potentially come

0:51:00.800 --> 0:51:03.520
<v Speaker 1>back the wide receiver from Alabama could play this week,

0:51:03.560 --> 0:51:08.280
<v Speaker 1>and what would that do for his draft shot? Excuse

0:51:08.320 --> 0:51:12.000
<v Speaker 1>me draft stock and DeVante Smith's draft stock, because I

0:51:12.000 --> 0:51:14.360
<v Speaker 1>mean DeVante Smith whenever he's the featured piece, even of

0:51:14.360 --> 0:51:16.520
<v Speaker 1>course went off and won a Heisman. But I mean

0:51:16.600 --> 0:51:20.440
<v Speaker 1>some would argue that Jaylen Waddle was the more impressive player,

0:51:20.680 --> 0:51:23.560
<v Speaker 1>at least from an NFL prospect level early on. Is

0:51:23.600 --> 0:51:27.560
<v Speaker 1>that something that potentially could see shift a little bit

0:51:27.600 --> 0:51:31.000
<v Speaker 1>depending on how Waddle plays in the championship game. I

0:51:31.360 --> 0:51:34.000
<v Speaker 1>don't know, I'd be surprised, just because if Waddle can

0:51:34.040 --> 0:51:35.800
<v Speaker 1>even play, I think he'll be on a pitch count.

0:51:35.840 --> 0:51:38.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, we might only see him play ten fifteen snaps,

0:51:38.800 --> 0:51:40.960
<v Speaker 1>So you know, I don't know that here's necessarily anything

0:51:41.000 --> 0:51:43.400
<v Speaker 1>he can do in this game that's going to change

0:51:43.400 --> 0:51:46.239
<v Speaker 1>your opinion based off of what we already know right now.

0:51:46.680 --> 0:51:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it just really comes down to what you're

0:51:48.520 --> 0:51:51.720
<v Speaker 1>looking for at the receiver position. If you know DeVante Smith,

0:51:52.040 --> 0:51:55.680
<v Speaker 1>he's you know, obviously extremely talented. But if you have

0:51:55.719 --> 0:51:59.319
<v Speaker 1>concerns about that body holding up, that's, you know, nothing

0:51:59.400 --> 0:52:02.239
<v Speaker 1>Jaylen Wattle it can do is going to kind of

0:52:02.360 --> 0:52:05.279
<v Speaker 1>change that or alter that. With Jalen Waddle, He's not

0:52:05.320 --> 0:52:09.160
<v Speaker 1>as polished as as DeVante Smith, but I think he's

0:52:09.160 --> 0:52:11.279
<v Speaker 1>a little more polished than say Henry Ruggs last year,

0:52:11.320 --> 0:52:14.479
<v Speaker 1>who was the first receiver drafted. So both these guys

0:52:14.480 --> 0:52:16.719
<v Speaker 1>are studs and I think are gonna be future top

0:52:16.719 --> 0:52:20.960
<v Speaker 1>twelve picks. You can and I think of that one

0:52:21.000 --> 0:52:23.680
<v Speaker 1>thing that I'm really excited to watch and Dan you

0:52:23.760 --> 0:52:25.239
<v Speaker 1>mentioned his name of a minute ago, but I feel

0:52:25.239 --> 0:52:28.120
<v Speaker 1>like we haven't talked about him much, And part of

0:52:28.120 --> 0:52:31.839
<v Speaker 1>it is because he hasn't declared. Joe the cornerback from

0:52:31.880 --> 0:52:35.560
<v Speaker 1>Alabama on the other side of Sir Tan like a

0:52:35.600 --> 0:52:37.719
<v Speaker 1>big game. Maybe he's like, Okay, well, now I can

0:52:37.760 --> 0:52:40.040
<v Speaker 1>just go ahead and declare because I mean when I

0:52:40.080 --> 0:52:42.600
<v Speaker 1>watched him on tape, he is definitely a top ten

0:52:42.680 --> 0:52:45.840
<v Speaker 1>corner for me. If he's going to be in the draft.

0:52:46.239 --> 0:52:48.600
<v Speaker 1>What are your thoughts on job and he's number twenty

0:52:48.600 --> 0:52:50.120
<v Speaker 1>eight by the way, for those watching the game on

0:52:50.239 --> 0:52:54.359
<v Speaker 1>Monday night, what are your thoughts on Joe? Well, yeah,

0:52:54.400 --> 0:52:57.680
<v Speaker 1>he's big, he's physical. He's not the type of athlete

0:52:57.719 --> 0:53:00.200
<v Speaker 1>where he's just going to be able to quickly recall. Ever,

0:53:00.840 --> 0:53:03.520
<v Speaker 1>uh you know if he's caught out of position. He's

0:53:03.560 --> 0:53:06.800
<v Speaker 1>not that twitchy athlete. But he's big and he's physical,

0:53:06.880 --> 0:53:10.040
<v Speaker 1>and he does a really nice job being disruptive and

0:53:10.080 --> 0:53:13.080
<v Speaker 1>so I you know, it's tough because when you stack

0:53:13.160 --> 0:53:16.319
<v Speaker 1>these corners, um, you know Joe, Yeah, he's right there

0:53:16.360 --> 0:53:18.680
<v Speaker 1>in that mix. But you know he's he's on the

0:53:18.719 --> 0:53:20.880
<v Speaker 1>same in the same tier as say like an Elijah

0:53:20.920 --> 0:53:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Molden or uh maybe a Greg Newsome or a Melofawn wu. Uh.

0:53:26.200 --> 0:53:29.200
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, this is a chance because we know that

0:53:29.400 --> 0:53:32.319
<v Speaker 1>Ohio State, you know Crystal Lava. I think he has

0:53:32.480 --> 0:53:34.880
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot to gain for him, and but it

0:53:34.960 --> 0:53:37.120
<v Speaker 1>doesn't stop there. They've got Garrett Wilson and a few

0:53:37.120 --> 0:53:40.840
<v Speaker 1>other guys. So if Ohio State says we're just not

0:53:40.840 --> 0:53:44.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna throw at certain, We're gonna throw at Josh Job, Okay,

0:53:44.239 --> 0:53:46.320
<v Speaker 1>well that's gonna be interesting to see if it's a

0:53:46.440 --> 0:53:50.000
<v Speaker 1>lava or if it's Garrett Wilson. Uh, he's going to

0:53:50.080 --> 0:53:52.719
<v Speaker 1>be tested. And so this is definitely a game that

0:53:52.840 --> 0:53:55.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, will affect where he is ultimately drafted. If

0:53:55.840 --> 0:53:58.479
<v Speaker 1>he decides to come out, I just want to throw

0:53:58.560 --> 0:54:02.560
<v Speaker 1>and Dane Dane mentioned him, but like, um, Christian Barmore

0:54:03.040 --> 0:54:06.080
<v Speaker 1>jumped off the screen in the semi final. And when

0:54:06.080 --> 0:54:09.000
<v Speaker 1>you think you know the caliber of offensive lineman that

0:54:09.080 --> 0:54:11.399
<v Speaker 1>Notre Dame puts out like that means something to me

0:54:11.480 --> 0:54:16.040
<v Speaker 1>for sure. So he he's definitely on my radar. And

0:54:16.360 --> 0:54:18.719
<v Speaker 1>you know, we Dane set it up perfectly like that.

0:54:18.800 --> 0:54:20.840
<v Speaker 1>You know, there's not a Derek Brown or a Javon

0:54:21.000 --> 0:54:24.799
<v Speaker 1>Kinlaw in this class. So if Christian Barmore can jump out,

0:54:24.840 --> 0:54:26.799
<v Speaker 1>and you know, I would love it if he's there

0:54:26.840 --> 0:54:29.120
<v Speaker 1>at forty four, but maybe he can even play better

0:54:29.120 --> 0:54:31.520
<v Speaker 1>than that and and go in the first round. And

0:54:31.560 --> 0:54:34.680
<v Speaker 1>then I mean, I love I love a good trash

0:54:34.680 --> 0:54:37.960
<v Speaker 1>talk and Sean Wade put himself on the radar this

0:54:38.000 --> 0:54:40.359
<v Speaker 1>morning because he said he wants all he wants all

0:54:40.400 --> 0:54:44.480
<v Speaker 1>of Davante Smith. And with what I'm gonna say, with

0:54:44.480 --> 0:54:46.640
<v Speaker 1>with all due respect to him, I think he's living

0:54:46.719 --> 0:54:49.440
<v Speaker 1>on his school's reputation a little bit more than his

0:54:49.520 --> 0:54:55.560
<v Speaker 1>actual production. So be careful what you wish for, buddy.

0:54:56.280 --> 0:54:59.080
<v Speaker 1>Give him credit for the confidence, you know. I mean

0:54:59.160 --> 0:55:02.279
<v Speaker 1>that's as a corner. You got to play confident. You

0:55:02.280 --> 0:55:05.720
<v Speaker 1>gotta be confident even when the season has not gone well,

0:55:05.800 --> 0:55:08.520
<v Speaker 1>and there's been more negative than positive from Sean Wade

0:55:08.520 --> 0:55:11.399
<v Speaker 1>this year. But I mean the Ohio State needs him

0:55:11.400 --> 0:55:13.680
<v Speaker 1>to step up, and you know, maybe he'll surprise as

0:55:13.719 --> 0:55:16.480
<v Speaker 1>all We'll say that would be interesting. But you talk

0:55:16.520 --> 0:55:19.359
<v Speaker 1>about potentially having so many points in the over under

0:55:19.400 --> 0:55:21.319
<v Speaker 1>at seventy four and a half, and I mean there's

0:55:21.320 --> 0:55:26.400
<v Speaker 1>so many different offensive talented players, But does that scare

0:55:26.400 --> 0:55:28.279
<v Speaker 1>you a little bit on these defensive guys. I mean

0:55:28.320 --> 0:55:31.480
<v Speaker 1>on both sides, on Alabama side and on Ohio State side.

0:55:31.719 --> 0:55:33.239
<v Speaker 1>The fact that there is going to be a ton

0:55:33.280 --> 0:55:35.080
<v Speaker 1>of points you are going to see both of these

0:55:35.080 --> 0:55:38.879
<v Speaker 1>offense have at least some sort of success. Is that

0:55:38.920 --> 0:55:41.919
<v Speaker 1>just a show that these offensive prospects are a little

0:55:41.920 --> 0:55:45.279
<v Speaker 1>bit better than maybe the defensive ones. Yeah, I mean that,

0:55:45.480 --> 0:55:47.480
<v Speaker 1>and that's just where the game is at. I mean,

0:55:47.560 --> 0:55:50.640
<v Speaker 1>we've seen more points scored this year in the NFL

0:55:51.320 --> 0:55:53.600
<v Speaker 1>than ever before. You know, it's just it's just gonna

0:55:53.600 --> 0:55:57.760
<v Speaker 1>be the trend. So you know, it will be interesting

0:55:57.800 --> 0:56:01.520
<v Speaker 1>though because Alabama. We've seen Alabama his defense. Uh you know,

0:56:01.600 --> 0:56:04.600
<v Speaker 1>see what Florida did against them in the SEC title game.

0:56:05.160 --> 0:56:07.000
<v Speaker 1>Go back to the Old Miss game and they put

0:56:07.040 --> 0:56:09.840
<v Speaker 1>up a ton of points against this Alabama defense. Uh,

0:56:09.880 --> 0:56:14.400
<v Speaker 1>there's there's there's certainly talent, but it's not maybe the

0:56:14.440 --> 0:56:18.279
<v Speaker 1>Alabama defense that we've seen over the years that Nick

0:56:18.320 --> 0:56:20.920
<v Speaker 1>Saban has put together. It doesn't mean they're without talent.

0:56:21.000 --> 0:56:23.920
<v Speaker 1>They have the talent, but as a unit, Uh, there's

0:56:23.920 --> 0:56:26.680
<v Speaker 1>some question marks. Um, you know, I'm I'm really eager.

0:56:26.680 --> 0:56:30.000
<v Speaker 1>And you know, going back to Christian Barmore, he's only

0:56:30.000 --> 0:56:32.640
<v Speaker 1>a richer sophomore, so he's still very young. He's only

0:56:32.719 --> 0:56:35.040
<v Speaker 1>he only has like four starts this year, but he

0:56:35.120 --> 0:56:37.640
<v Speaker 1>leads the team in sacks with seven, he leads the

0:56:37.640 --> 0:56:40.239
<v Speaker 1>team and forced fumbles with three. He's heating up at

0:56:40.280 --> 0:56:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the right moment, and he's going up against maybe the

0:56:44.000 --> 0:56:47.960
<v Speaker 1>top two interior offensive lineman in this draft, with Why

0:56:48.200 --> 0:56:50.600
<v Speaker 1>Davis right guard and Josh Meyers at center. And so

0:56:50.640 --> 0:56:53.040
<v Speaker 1>that's going to be a really interesting part of this

0:56:53.080 --> 0:56:57.719
<v Speaker 1>because part of you know, justin fields. Understandably h got

0:56:57.719 --> 0:57:00.400
<v Speaker 1>all the headlines after that Ohio State Clemson game, but

0:57:00.480 --> 0:57:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Ohio State won the trenches and that was really kind

0:57:03.480 --> 0:57:05.759
<v Speaker 1>of the difference in that game on both sides of

0:57:05.760 --> 0:57:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the ball. Their defensive line tore up that clumpson offensive line,

0:57:10.520 --> 0:57:12.880
<v Speaker 1>and they won't be able to necessarily do that to

0:57:13.120 --> 0:57:16.760
<v Speaker 1>Alabama's offensive line, especially or even with Lannon Dickerson out

0:57:16.800 --> 0:57:20.400
<v Speaker 1>their center, who's outstanding. You know they'll be missing him,

0:57:20.440 --> 0:57:22.880
<v Speaker 1>but even with him out, it still won't be that way.

0:57:23.000 --> 0:57:25.680
<v Speaker 1>And then on the other side, that Alabama defense, that

0:57:25.760 --> 0:57:29.120
<v Speaker 1>front seven, they'll give Ohio State's offensive line a little

0:57:29.160 --> 0:57:33.240
<v Speaker 1>more trouble than clumps into it. Yeah, Barmore's tape, the

0:57:33.280 --> 0:57:36.080
<v Speaker 1>second half of his tape of this year is a

0:57:36.120 --> 0:57:40.520
<v Speaker 1>water burger. The first half of this season Barnmore's tape

0:57:40.640 --> 0:57:45.080
<v Speaker 1>is your friend who can't cook's burger from the grill. So,

0:57:45.280 --> 0:57:47.560
<v Speaker 1>like you know, a since first round tape, on the

0:57:47.640 --> 0:57:49.880
<v Speaker 1>back half, Dana, I do want to want you to

0:57:49.880 --> 0:57:53.160
<v Speaker 1>talk about two guys. Alabama and Ohio State have two

0:57:53.200 --> 0:57:56.000
<v Speaker 1>guys at linebacker, and that's a position we might be

0:57:56.080 --> 0:57:59.919
<v Speaker 1>needing here. Dylan Moses, who had first round ceiling last

0:58:00.120 --> 0:58:01.960
<v Speaker 1>year and then blew out his knee and hasn't looked

0:58:02.000 --> 0:58:04.520
<v Speaker 1>the same. And then Browning from Ohio State. You know,

0:58:04.560 --> 0:58:06.480
<v Speaker 1>those are two guys Cowboys. Vin's gotta keep an eye

0:58:06.520 --> 0:58:09.680
<v Speaker 1>on Monday night. Definitely definite. And I would probably I

0:58:09.680 --> 0:58:12.080
<v Speaker 1>would even throw Pete Warner in their Ohio State linebacker

0:58:12.160 --> 0:58:15.160
<v Speaker 1>because he's just he's so dang versatile that you know,

0:58:15.320 --> 0:58:17.320
<v Speaker 1>you can you can use him in so many different ways.

0:58:17.320 --> 0:58:20.760
<v Speaker 1>He can, you know, play any of the linebacker positions,

0:58:20.760 --> 0:58:23.400
<v Speaker 1>the coaches have said, because he's he's so smart and

0:58:23.440 --> 0:58:26.040
<v Speaker 1>he's so athletic that they can pile as much as

0:58:26.040 --> 0:58:28.560
<v Speaker 1>they want on his tape or on his plate, and

0:58:28.680 --> 0:58:31.120
<v Speaker 1>that shows on tape. So Pete Warner, I thinks in

0:58:31.120 --> 0:58:34.000
<v Speaker 1>that discussion as well. But yeah, Barret Browning, he's got

0:58:34.000 --> 0:58:37.720
<v Speaker 1>all the traits. He always has. Texas kid who four

0:58:37.800 --> 0:58:43.000
<v Speaker 1>or five star? What's that worth kid? He went to Kenady, Yeah, exactly,

0:58:43.040 --> 0:58:45.040
<v Speaker 1>and so He's always had the talent, it's just kind

0:58:45.080 --> 0:58:47.840
<v Speaker 1>of the mental part catching up, and he still needs

0:58:47.840 --> 0:58:51.600
<v Speaker 1>to anticipate a little bit better. But he has gotten

0:58:51.600 --> 0:58:53.920
<v Speaker 1>better and better every year. He could play man coverage.

0:58:54.120 --> 0:58:57.040
<v Speaker 1>So watching him going up against Nagy Harris, who we

0:58:57.120 --> 0:58:59.840
<v Speaker 1>know is an excellent pass catcher out of the back,

0:59:00.560 --> 0:59:03.120
<v Speaker 1>that will be an awesome matchup to watch. And then

0:59:03.160 --> 0:59:05.840
<v Speaker 1>you know with Dylan Moses, you know he as a

0:59:06.040 --> 0:59:08.000
<v Speaker 1>as a what a sophomore, he looked like a future

0:59:08.040 --> 0:59:11.920
<v Speaker 1>top ten pick, explosive athlete, just kept making plays. Then

0:59:11.920 --> 0:59:13.920
<v Speaker 1>he had the knee injury, and this year he just

0:59:14.040 --> 0:59:16.880
<v Speaker 1>has not looked the same, like Hayt said, And you know,

0:59:16.920 --> 0:59:21.080
<v Speaker 1>whether it's him struggling the hold or to hang with

0:59:21.160 --> 0:59:24.360
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Pitts, which you know nobody really can, or if

0:59:24.360 --> 0:59:26.920
<v Speaker 1>he's just you know, taking wrong angles to the football.

0:59:27.480 --> 0:59:31.360
<v Speaker 1>He is is still in that top fifty discussion, but

0:59:31.440 --> 0:59:33.160
<v Speaker 1>he just doesn't look like the same player. And so

0:59:33.400 --> 0:59:36.040
<v Speaker 1>going up against Trey Sermon, who I mean Trey Sermon,

0:59:36.080 --> 0:59:39.720
<v Speaker 1>who is putting together one of the best three four

0:59:39.760 --> 0:59:43.120
<v Speaker 1>game stretches we've seen a running back in a long time,

0:59:43.360 --> 0:59:46.280
<v Speaker 1>and he's averaging nine point one yards per carry the

0:59:46.320 --> 0:59:49.200
<v Speaker 1>last three games. What can he do against Dylan Moses

0:59:49.200 --> 0:59:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and at Alabama defensive front that that'll be another major storyline,

0:59:54.040 --> 0:59:56.480
<v Speaker 1>not only for the outcome of this game, but also

0:59:57.040 --> 1:00:01.560
<v Speaker 1>for NFL scouts. So there's your homework assignment, ladies and gentlemen.

1:00:01.720 --> 1:00:05.360
<v Speaker 1>Is watched these linebackers in the National Championship Game, number

1:00:05.440 --> 1:00:08.360
<v Speaker 1>thirty two, Dylan Moses for Alabama and then Baron Browning

1:00:08.640 --> 1:00:11.600
<v Speaker 1>number five, the linebacker for Ohio State, who, like we

1:00:11.600 --> 1:00:14.160
<v Speaker 1>said a moment ago, I also like his size going

1:00:14.240 --> 1:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>up against Najay Harris Danny because I mean six three,

1:00:17.080 --> 1:00:20.360
<v Speaker 1>two forty he looks the part of a bruiser linebacker

1:00:20.400 --> 1:00:23.120
<v Speaker 1>and I long too. Yeah he is. He's got some

1:00:23.200 --> 1:00:25.720
<v Speaker 1>long arms, and I think he's got somebody or he

1:00:25.840 --> 1:00:29.400
<v Speaker 1>is somebody that could slow down Naja Harris and his size,

1:00:29.440 --> 1:00:31.920
<v Speaker 1>I think that's gonna be a fantastic matchup. But that's

1:00:31.920 --> 1:00:34.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna do it for us here on the Draft Show today.

1:00:35.080 --> 1:00:38.280
<v Speaker 1>We will be back on Tuesday as Dave Hellman will

1:00:38.320 --> 1:00:41.880
<v Speaker 1>rejoin Brian brought Us and Bucky Brooks for that show,

1:00:41.920 --> 1:00:44.160
<v Speaker 1>and then Katie and Dane will be back with Jeff

1:00:44.200 --> 1:00:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Cavanaugh on Thursday pending changes last minute like we had

1:00:49.240 --> 1:00:51.360
<v Speaker 1>this week, but we'll switch it around and we'll have

1:00:51.600 --> 1:00:54.120
<v Speaker 1>some of the best draft coverage you can find onto

1:00:54.400 --> 1:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>internet whenever it comes to the twenty twenty one class.

1:00:58.760 --> 1:01:01.680
<v Speaker 1>But for Dame Brugwood, for day Helman, for Katie, and

1:01:01.720 --> 1:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>for Chris Bean back in the studios, I'm Kyle Yeoman

1:01:04.040 --> 1:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>saying so long, thanks for joining us here on the

1:01:05.960 --> 1:01:06.480
<v Speaker 1>Draft Show.