WEBVTT - David Schoen - December 27th, Hour 1

0:00:00.800 --> 0:00:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Hello America, and welcome to the Sean Hannity Show. As

0:00:05.600 --> 0:00:10.200
<v Speaker 1>you have already instantly guessed, I am not Sean. Shawn

0:00:10.360 --> 0:00:13.480
<v Speaker 1>is enjoying the last of his much deserved twenty twenty

0:00:13.480 --> 0:00:17.680
<v Speaker 1>four end of year vacation, getting ready to get back,

0:00:17.760 --> 0:00:20.840
<v Speaker 1>and as we all head into the first year of

0:00:20.920 --> 0:00:25.599
<v Speaker 1>the Trump presidency. I am Jeffrey Lord, contributing editor the

0:00:25.640 --> 0:00:30.880
<v Speaker 1>American Spectator, a Newsmas TV contributor, and columnists for NewsBusters,

0:00:30.880 --> 0:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the Media Research Center's media watchdog. So let's let's get

0:00:36.479 --> 0:00:39.080
<v Speaker 1>right into it. If we can do that, We've got

0:00:39.120 --> 0:00:43.239
<v Speaker 1>some great guests coming up. We have Civil Liberties and

0:00:43.760 --> 0:00:49.640
<v Speaker 1>former Trump Attorney Council David Shoon. We have our friends

0:00:49.680 --> 0:00:53.920
<v Speaker 1>Matt and Mercy Schlapp from the American Conservative Union and SEAPAC.

0:00:54.600 --> 0:00:59.280
<v Speaker 1>And my friend in fellow Pennsylvania, Jeff Bartos, who has

0:00:59.400 --> 0:01:02.760
<v Speaker 1>run for the US Senate from Pennsylvania himself and spent

0:01:02.880 --> 0:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>some significant time helping Dave McCormick win this Senate seat

0:01:08.040 --> 0:01:13.280
<v Speaker 1>in a unbelievable race against three term in common Democrat

0:01:13.360 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Bob Casey, the namesake son of his late dad, Governor

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Robert P. Casey. So we've got a good show going

0:01:22.280 --> 0:01:24.920
<v Speaker 1>for you here, and I just want to I want

0:01:24.959 --> 0:01:28.440
<v Speaker 1>to start with talking a little bit about what Sean

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:33.160
<v Speaker 1>loves to talk about, the media mob. And one of

0:01:33.200 --> 0:01:35.600
<v Speaker 1>the things that has gotten me going here in the

0:01:35.680 --> 0:01:40.479
<v Speaker 1>last few days, I saw a you know, I read

0:01:40.480 --> 0:01:44.119
<v Speaker 1>the Washington Post, so you don't have to, and one

0:01:44.200 --> 0:01:48.040
<v Speaker 1>of the things I noticed was this column. It was

0:01:48.040 --> 0:01:50.960
<v Speaker 1>written two days published two days before Christmas in the Post,

0:01:51.760 --> 0:01:55.280
<v Speaker 1>and it was by a columnist of theirs named Eugene Robinson,

0:01:55.320 --> 0:01:57.760
<v Speaker 1>who I'm sure is a nice enough guy. But his

0:01:57.880 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 1>headline was, we cannot by Donald Trump's wish for a

0:02:01.800 --> 0:02:05.880
<v Speaker 1>compliant news media fight the President elect's attack on independent

0:02:05.920 --> 0:02:10.359
<v Speaker 1>journalism with the pro truth stands now in this step,

0:02:10.960 --> 0:02:15.600
<v Speaker 1>in this gem. Rather, he begins by saying this, anyone

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:19.640
<v Speaker 1>who doubts the incoming Trump administration poses a serious threat

0:02:19.919 --> 0:02:24.440
<v Speaker 1>to independent journalism catch that phrase. Independent journalism has not

0:02:24.480 --> 0:02:28.000
<v Speaker 1>been paying attention, an attack, he says, is already underway,

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:31.600
<v Speaker 1>and we journalists must now allow ourselves to be intimidated

0:02:31.720 --> 0:02:36.120
<v Speaker 1>unquote now, to which one can only reply with a

0:02:36.200 --> 0:02:41.920
<v Speaker 1>considerable burst of outright laughter. In fact, I would suggest

0:02:41.960 --> 0:02:46.640
<v Speaker 1>mister Robinson has it completely backwards. The Washington Post and

0:02:46.680 --> 0:02:50.320
<v Speaker 1>its allies in the so called quote unquote mainstream media

0:02:50.440 --> 0:02:58.760
<v Speaker 1>are anything about being seeking quote independent journalism quote unquote.

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:02.760
<v Speaker 1>They are the central players in what is much more

0:03:02.800 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 1>accurately known as the liberal media. They themselves are the

0:03:07.320 --> 0:03:12.040
<v Speaker 1>compliant ones who have long ago abandoned independent journalism to

0:03:12.120 --> 0:03:16.760
<v Speaker 1>take sides one side, specifically in our political discussions of

0:03:16.800 --> 0:03:21.680
<v Speaker 1>the day. Some examples back before the twenty twenty four election.

0:03:22.000 --> 0:03:26.440
<v Speaker 1>In October, the New York Post headlined this more Washington

0:03:26.480 --> 0:03:31.639
<v Speaker 1>Post staffers resign over paper's failure to endorse Kamala Harris.

0:03:32.400 --> 0:03:36.120
<v Speaker 1>That story reported quote at least two more staffers have

0:03:36.240 --> 0:03:39.280
<v Speaker 1>penned their last story for the Washington Post, Don't you

0:03:39.320 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>love this? As employees resign in protest over the Broadsheets

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:46.880
<v Speaker 1>decision not to endorse Kamala Harris for the twenty twenty

0:03:46.920 --> 0:03:52.560
<v Speaker 1>four presidential election. Editorial board members David Hoffman and Molly

0:03:52.640 --> 0:03:58.280
<v Speaker 1>Roberts have issued their resignations. Semiphore. Media journalist Max Tannai

0:03:58.520 --> 0:04:03.000
<v Speaker 1>reported on Monday the two longtime Washington Post staffers each

0:04:03.080 --> 0:04:09.200
<v Speaker 1>authored resignation letters slamming the paper's decision not to endorse Harris. Quote.

0:04:09.240 --> 0:04:12.240
<v Speaker 1>They said, I believe we face a very real threat

0:04:12.280 --> 0:04:16.440
<v Speaker 1>of autocracy in the candidacy of Donald Trump unquote, said Hoffman,

0:04:16.480 --> 0:04:19.200
<v Speaker 1>who took home the Pulitzer Prize last week and first

0:04:19.279 --> 0:04:22.080
<v Speaker 1>joined the paper in nineteen eighty two. And he was

0:04:22.120 --> 0:04:25.080
<v Speaker 1>writing this in his resignation letter, which of course was

0:04:25.120 --> 0:04:28.360
<v Speaker 1>posted on x. He went on, I find it untenable

0:04:28.440 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>and unconscionable that we have lost our voice at this

0:04:31.680 --> 0:04:36.760
<v Speaker 1>perilous moment quote unquote. And Ms Roberts, another longtime employee

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:39.240
<v Speaker 1>of the Post who first joined the paper as a

0:04:39.279 --> 0:04:43.039
<v Speaker 1>student intern while studying at Harvard University, said she was

0:04:43.080 --> 0:04:47.719
<v Speaker 1>resigning due to the paper's refusal to endorse Harris. Quote.

0:04:47.839 --> 0:04:51.880
<v Speaker 1>I'm resigning from the Post editorial board because the imperative

0:04:51.920 --> 0:04:55.120
<v Speaker 1>to endorse Kamala Harris over Donald Trump is about as

0:04:55.160 --> 0:04:58.159
<v Speaker 1>morally clear as it gets, she said. She went on

0:04:58.240 --> 0:05:01.560
<v Speaker 1>to write in her resignation letter, worse, our silence is

0:05:01.600 --> 0:05:04.960
<v Speaker 1>exactly what Donald Trump wants for the media, for us

0:05:05.120 --> 0:05:10.440
<v Speaker 1>to keep quiet unquote. So right there, the veil gets

0:05:10.480 --> 0:05:14.880
<v Speaker 1>torn away from Robinson's supposed quote unquote independent journalism at

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the Washington Post. Interestingly, the same situation arose across the

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:23.640
<v Speaker 1>country at the Los Angeles Times. CBS News headlined that

0:05:23.800 --> 0:05:27.919
<v Speaker 1>story this way, Two more LA Times editorial board members

0:05:27.960 --> 0:05:34.120
<v Speaker 1>resign after the paper withholds a Harris endorsement, Unlike columnist

0:05:34.200 --> 0:05:37.360
<v Speaker 1>Robinson over there in the New York Post, where a

0:05:37.400 --> 0:05:41.479
<v Speaker 1>great columnist named Michael Goodwin has reported the reality of

0:05:41.600 --> 0:05:46.320
<v Speaker 1>the fanatical and decidedly non independent journalism of the day

0:05:46.360 --> 0:05:50.839
<v Speaker 1>from liberals, mister Goodwin headlined, the left wing media created

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:53.960
<v Speaker 1>their own crisis and now have to pay the price

0:05:54.320 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 1>for repeatedly attacking Donald Trump. Goodwin wrote, even as defeated

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:02.720
<v Speaker 1>Democrats try to decide who they are and what they

0:06:02.760 --> 0:06:07.760
<v Speaker 1>believe in their media handmaids, what they believe in their

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:11.240
<v Speaker 1>media handmaids, face a crisis of their own. The come

0:06:11.320 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 1>up and against their politically driven bias, say again, bias

0:06:16.200 --> 0:06:19.039
<v Speaker 1>has arrived, and it's proving to be expensive in more

0:06:19.080 --> 0:06:23.120
<v Speaker 1>ways than one. ABC News and its chief Democratic operative

0:06:23.160 --> 0:06:28.279
<v Speaker 1>George Stephanopolis the rights fell into another trap. They meaning ABC,

0:06:28.520 --> 0:06:31.640
<v Speaker 1>put their agenda of defeating Trump ahead of the facts

0:06:31.680 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 1>and the law, and faced with depositions that likely would

0:06:35.000 --> 0:06:40.360
<v Speaker 1>have supported his claim of defamation, ABC caved in a settlement.

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>I still find this incredible in a settlement, the network

0:06:44.480 --> 0:06:49.600
<v Speaker 1>forked over sixteen million dollars for a Trump library and

0:06:49.640 --> 0:06:54.039
<v Speaker 1>his legal fees, and had to publicly say they quote

0:06:54.160 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>regret unquote Stephanopolos's false claims that Trump had been found

0:06:58.920 --> 0:07:03.160
<v Speaker 1>libel for rape in a civil case, says Goodwin Ouch.

0:07:03.839 --> 0:07:08.679
<v Speaker 1>The apology surely stung much more than the money. Unquote. Well,

0:07:08.760 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 1>I think that is safe to say. And you know,

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:14.240
<v Speaker 1>it isn't just major newspapers that have the left wing

0:07:14.280 --> 0:07:18.760
<v Speaker 1>bias problem. As this is written, Fox News is headlining

0:07:18.840 --> 0:07:25.560
<v Speaker 1>something else quote TV Saturday Night Late Night, TV Saturday

0:07:25.640 --> 0:07:31.680
<v Speaker 1>Night Lives boring, anti Trump's gold routines go unheeded. Well expletive,

0:07:31.720 --> 0:07:35.000
<v Speaker 1>I can't say. On the radio, it happened again, they said.

0:07:35.480 --> 0:07:39.239
<v Speaker 1>Late night hosts melted down the night after Trump's twenty

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:43.200
<v Speaker 1>twenty four victory after making him the butt of ninety

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>eight percent of their political jokes. The story goes on

0:07:48.240 --> 0:07:51.760
<v Speaker 1>to report on the antics of late night hosts Stephen Colbert,

0:07:51.840 --> 0:07:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Jimmy Kimmel, Seth Meyers, and others, including of course NBC's

0:07:56.200 --> 0:08:00.280
<v Speaker 1>Saturday Night Live, going all in on pro democratic and

0:08:00.360 --> 0:08:05.640
<v Speaker 1>anti Trump humor quote unquote well exactly, yet with all

0:08:05.680 --> 0:08:08.280
<v Speaker 1>of this out there, not to mention oh so much

0:08:08.360 --> 0:08:11.640
<v Speaker 1>more in the way of a decidedly far left leaning media.

0:08:12.160 --> 0:08:16.400
<v Speaker 1>There is the Washington Post, mister Robinson saying, quote and

0:08:16.440 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 1>when Trump takes office, the threat will escalate, perhaps dramatically unquote.

0:08:22.040 --> 0:08:25.680
<v Speaker 1>The real threat, let me just say this to American democracy,

0:08:26.200 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 1>is the central fact that Robinson simply ignores. That central

0:08:31.200 --> 0:08:36.920
<v Speaker 1>fact being that American journalism has overwhelmingly abandoned the idea

0:08:37.080 --> 0:08:41.680
<v Speaker 1>of so called independent journalism. And it should be noted

0:08:42.160 --> 0:08:45.640
<v Speaker 1>this problem has been around a long time before Donald

0:08:45.640 --> 0:08:49.360
<v Speaker 1>Trump came on the political seat. You read the memoirs

0:08:49.360 --> 0:08:52.120
<v Speaker 1>as I've done over the years of Republicans like nineteen

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:57.040
<v Speaker 1>sixty four Republican nominee Senator Barry Goldwater, or former President

0:08:57.160 --> 0:09:00.840
<v Speaker 1>Richard Nixon, or the Bush's father and son and others

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:03.480
<v Speaker 1>from the conservative side of the aisle, and there is

0:09:03.559 --> 0:09:06.520
<v Speaker 1>reference after reference to the liberal media and the hard

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:10.120
<v Speaker 1>fact and that person's days on the active political scene

0:09:10.360 --> 0:09:14.280
<v Speaker 1>that they had to constantly deal with a far left

0:09:14.360 --> 0:09:19.440
<v Speaker 1>leaning media. You want an example, In August of twenty eighteen,

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:23.360
<v Speaker 1>the Washington Examiners Paul Baddard took a look back and

0:09:23.520 --> 0:09:31.000
<v Speaker 1>headlined public's media hat fanned by Trump started with George H. W. Bush,

0:09:31.400 --> 0:09:35.760
<v Speaker 1>and Badard wrote former President George H. W. Bush. HW

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Bush had it a lot better than President Trump. Economic

0:09:38.960 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 1>growth was humming at five percent, his polling was high,

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:44.040
<v Speaker 1>and he was on duty in the Oval Office when

0:09:44.040 --> 0:09:47.760
<v Speaker 1>the Berlin Wall fell and the Soviet Union crumbled. But

0:09:47.800 --> 0:09:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the press attacked him, and as he headed to defeat

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:54.600
<v Speaker 1>to Bill Clinton, Bush became the first president to publicly

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:59.959
<v Speaker 1>rip on the media at campaign events, even handing out redhair.

0:10:00.559 --> 0:10:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I remember this that had the words quote annoy the media,

0:10:05.400 --> 0:10:09.320
<v Speaker 1>re elect Bush on them. Former Bush aid Mary Madeleine

0:10:09.360 --> 0:10:13.640
<v Speaker 1>is quoted by bedardas saying, quote, Madeleine, isn't surprised the

0:10:13.640 --> 0:10:16.520
<v Speaker 1>public has turned on the press again. The assaults on

0:10:16.600 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 1>freedom of speech religiosity, combined with the hypocrisy of a

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:24.440
<v Speaker 1>ruling class exempting themselves from all the degenerative policies they

0:10:24.520 --> 0:10:29.200
<v Speaker 1>imposed on the electorate, created a combustible environment, and Trump

0:10:29.280 --> 0:10:33.240
<v Speaker 1>picked up the fire starter. She said in short, the

0:10:33.280 --> 0:10:35.920
<v Speaker 1>idea of being pushed in the Washington Post by one

0:10:35.920 --> 0:10:40.920
<v Speaker 1>of its own, mister Robinson, is completely upside down and backwards.

0:10:41.480 --> 0:10:45.920
<v Speaker 1>He ends by saying this we work for the people,

0:10:46.120 --> 0:10:49.800
<v Speaker 1>not the president. Whenever it's necessary, will remind the President

0:10:49.840 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 1>that he works for the people too, quote unquote. Well,

0:10:53.280 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 1>suffice to say, when large media organizations present themselves as

0:10:57.880 --> 0:11:02.440
<v Speaker 1>doing quote independent journalism quote, when in fact they are

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:06.599
<v Speaker 1>about furthering a far left wing agenda, not independent journalism,

0:11:07.080 --> 0:11:11.680
<v Speaker 1>they are not quote working for the people unquote. The irony.

0:11:12.160 --> 0:11:15.679
<v Speaker 1>The American people have long gotten onto this game of

0:11:15.760 --> 0:11:19.760
<v Speaker 1>the media pretending to be doing independent journalism when in

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:24.240
<v Speaker 1>fact they are doing the opposite. In October of twenty

0:11:24.320 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>twenty four, the Gallup Organization headlined this story, Americans trust

0:11:29.280 --> 0:11:33.240
<v Speaker 1>in media remains a trend low trust in political and

0:11:33.280 --> 0:11:37.480
<v Speaker 1>civic institution's highest for local and state governments, lowest for

0:11:37.640 --> 0:11:42.400
<v Speaker 1>media and Congress. The story reported, for the third consecutive

0:11:42.480 --> 0:11:45.120
<v Speaker 1>year more US adults have no trust at all in

0:11:45.160 --> 0:11:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the media. That would be thirty six percent than trusted

0:11:48.440 --> 0:11:51.600
<v Speaker 1>a great deal or fair amount. Another thirty three percent

0:11:51.640 --> 0:11:56.280
<v Speaker 1>of Americans express quote not very much confidence. There is

0:11:56.520 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 1>a reason for this, and when a Washington Post columnst

0:11:59.840 --> 0:12:03.720
<v Speaker 1>so so prominently denies the reality of that reason, media

0:12:03.880 --> 0:12:11.520
<v Speaker 1>credibility takes are suffer another hit. Shocking not and I'm

0:12:11.559 --> 0:12:15.880
<v Speaker 1>sure you have all seen the stories of MSNBC and

0:12:16.000 --> 0:12:19.960
<v Speaker 1>CNN losing their audience and having all kinds of problems

0:12:20.000 --> 0:12:24.920
<v Speaker 1>out there. And interestingly, I vividly remember a personal note

0:12:24.920 --> 0:12:28.120
<v Speaker 1>here when I was on CNN in the twenty sixteen

0:12:28.160 --> 0:12:36.560
<v Speaker 1>election campaign defending then candidate Trump. It drew, as I

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:40.520
<v Speaker 1>began to understand, it drew considerable attention, and I was

0:12:40.559 --> 0:12:44.520
<v Speaker 1>told personally by the president of the network that my

0:12:44.679 --> 0:12:48.920
<v Speaker 1>appearance on the shows there was actually helping the ratings

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:55.240
<v Speaker 1>at CNN. Ah, you can't make this stuff up. So

0:12:56.280 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 1>we're going to go on and we'll talk a little

0:12:57.960 --> 0:13:00.280
<v Speaker 1>bit more about this. One of the things that sort

0:13:00.280 --> 0:13:02.440
<v Speaker 1>of as a corollary I think to all of this,

0:13:03.000 --> 0:13:05.960
<v Speaker 1>and we're going to talk about this with David shown,

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 1>and that is the rise of law fair and weaponizing

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:15.840
<v Speaker 1>the law to go after your political opponents. You know,

0:13:15.920 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 1>I always find it very interesting that when you are

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:24.800
<v Speaker 1>accused by the left of whatever terrible thing they want

0:13:24.840 --> 0:13:26.960
<v Speaker 1>to accuse you of, in point of fact, they're the

0:13:26.960 --> 0:13:30.079
<v Speaker 1>ones that are guilty of it. They're the ones who

0:13:31.559 --> 0:13:37.400
<v Speaker 1>do this. And when they talk about Donald Trump wanting

0:13:37.440 --> 0:13:41.160
<v Speaker 1>to be or he is a fascist, or he's going

0:13:41.160 --> 0:13:43.360
<v Speaker 1>to do this or he's going to do that. And

0:13:43.400 --> 0:13:46.280
<v Speaker 1>then at the same time they talk about all of

0:13:46.280 --> 0:13:49.440
<v Speaker 1>the legal things that have been hurled in Donald Trump's direction.

0:13:49.840 --> 0:13:53.880
<v Speaker 1>Well who's doing that. We're getting We're getting some music here,

0:13:53.920 --> 0:13:56.600
<v Speaker 1>and we'll come back and talk that in just a

0:13:56.640 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit. But wow, we we're done now. I guess

0:14:00.960 --> 0:14:05.520
<v Speaker 1>saying Merry Christmas, Happy fourth of July, no, happy New Year.

0:14:07.520 --> 0:14:10.480
<v Speaker 1>Welcome back to the Sean Hannity Show. And let me

0:14:11.080 --> 0:14:14.440
<v Speaker 1>start out the segment here by giving you the phone

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:18.920
<v Speaker 1>number to call in. It's eight hundred nine four one

0:14:18.960 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>seven three two six, or in other words, eight hundred

0:14:22.360 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 1>ninety four to one Sean, and I hope you will

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 1>holler a little bit. You know, we've got some very

0:14:29.720 --> 0:14:34.720
<v Speaker 1>interesting times coming up President Trump. I always find this

0:14:35.040 --> 0:14:39.560
<v Speaker 1>comeback of his absolutely remarkable. And for those of you

0:14:39.680 --> 0:14:41.200
<v Speaker 1>out there, and I'm sure it's a lot of you

0:14:41.200 --> 0:14:43.960
<v Speaker 1>who know your American history, this kind of thing has

0:14:44.000 --> 0:14:48.200
<v Speaker 1>not happened since Grover Cleveland was President of the United States.

0:14:48.640 --> 0:14:51.280
<v Speaker 1>Groover Cleveland had been mayor of Buffalo, the governor of

0:14:51.360 --> 0:14:53.880
<v Speaker 1>New York. He was elected President of the United States

0:14:53.920 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>in eighteen forty four. I think it was I'm sorry.

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:01.960
<v Speaker 1>Eighteen eighty four years later, he was defeated by the

0:15:02.080 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 1>son or grandson of President William Henry Harrison, Benjamin Harrison

0:15:07.120 --> 0:15:12.600
<v Speaker 1>by name uh and William Henry Harrison was famous in history.

0:15:13.000 --> 0:15:15.640
<v Speaker 1>He was the hero of the Battle of Tippy Canoe,

0:15:15.680 --> 0:15:18.080
<v Speaker 1>and the slogan of the campaign was Tippy Canoe and

0:15:18.120 --> 0:15:21.240
<v Speaker 1>Tyler too, John Tyler of Virginia Center from Virginia, I think,

0:15:21.520 --> 0:15:25.840
<v Speaker 1>being his running mate. Well, he got he got elected,

0:15:25.880 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 1>gave his inaugural address, caught a cold, and died in office.

0:15:29.640 --> 0:15:34.280
<v Speaker 1>So that was that was about it. So Grover Cleveland

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:37.360
<v Speaker 1>eventually came back four years later. So President Trump is repeating,

0:15:37.360 --> 0:15:39.920
<v Speaker 1>and we will see what's going to happen here. So

0:15:40.040 --> 0:15:42.960
<v Speaker 1>let's say we've got a little break here and we

0:15:43.040 --> 0:15:46.280
<v Speaker 1>will go from there and welcome back to the Sean

0:15:46.360 --> 0:15:49.480
<v Speaker 1>Hannity Show. This is Jeffrey Lord filling in for Sean

0:15:50.360 --> 0:15:53.120
<v Speaker 1>and I want to start out by giving our call

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:55.800
<v Speaker 1>in number here eight hundred and nine four one, seven,

0:15:55.920 --> 0:15:58.760
<v Speaker 1>three two six or eight hundred ninety four one. Sean.

0:16:00.200 --> 0:16:04.160
<v Speaker 1>I want to bring on now our guest David Shoan,

0:16:04.920 --> 0:16:09.600
<v Speaker 1>who is a former counsel to President Trump. A noted

0:16:09.640 --> 0:16:14.640
<v Speaker 1>civil liberties attorney, and David, before we start to talk,

0:16:15.120 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 1>I have a our friend, Jason has a clip here

0:16:18.440 --> 0:16:22.800
<v Speaker 1>of District Attorney Bragg in New York that he's going

0:16:22.840 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 1>to play for us, and that I think can help

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:27.560
<v Speaker 1>us set up our discussion here. I know a lot

0:16:27.560 --> 0:16:32.000
<v Speaker 1>of people are wondering, whoever has this job? Are they

0:16:32.040 --> 0:16:33.640
<v Speaker 1>going to convict Donald Trump?

0:16:34.160 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 2>Look, that is the number one issue. The Times calls

0:16:39.800 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 2>Brag a talented prosecutor who's successful suit of the Trump

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 2>Foundation could be invaluable experience.

0:16:45.680 --> 0:16:48.040
<v Speaker 1>But the investigation he'll take over is.

0:16:48.000 --> 0:16:51.040
<v Speaker 2>The chief Deputy Attorney General in New York State. I

0:16:51.080 --> 0:16:54.600
<v Speaker 2>oversaw some of the office's biggest cases from exposing a

0:16:54.680 --> 0:16:57.120
<v Speaker 2>legal behavior by the Trump Foundation. We know there's a

0:16:57.160 --> 0:17:01.280
<v Speaker 2>Trump investigation. I have investigated Trump and his children and

0:17:01.280 --> 0:17:04.160
<v Speaker 2>held them accountable for their misconduct with the Trump Foundation.

0:17:04.560 --> 0:17:07.800
<v Speaker 2>I also sued the Trump administration more than one hundred times.

0:17:07.880 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 2>We know that the DA investigating Trump. When I was

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:14.359
<v Speaker 2>at the AG's office, I sued Trump over one hundred

0:17:14.359 --> 0:17:18.160
<v Speaker 2>times for his administration's misconduct and brought a case against

0:17:18.200 --> 0:17:20.040
<v Speaker 2>the Trump Foundation and held him accountable.

0:17:21.480 --> 0:17:26.440
<v Speaker 1>All Right, David, welcome to the Sean Hannity Show, Thank

0:17:26.480 --> 0:17:29.960
<v Speaker 1>you very much. I got to add, I am not

0:17:30.040 --> 0:17:32.200
<v Speaker 1>a lawyer, but I listened to that kind of thing,

0:17:32.240 --> 0:17:38.200
<v Speaker 1>and I've watched the whole business unfold with all these

0:17:38.320 --> 0:17:42.439
<v Speaker 1>legal proceedings against President Trump, and it just seems to me,

0:17:42.560 --> 0:17:46.200
<v Speaker 1>as a non lawyer, that this is about a bunch

0:17:46.240 --> 0:17:52.639
<v Speaker 1>of insider inside legal system that doesn't like somebody, and

0:17:52.720 --> 0:17:56.399
<v Speaker 1>so whether it's the US Justice Department or the district

0:17:56.400 --> 0:18:00.840
<v Speaker 1>attorneys in New York City or Fulton County in Georgia,

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:05.520
<v Speaker 1>they're going out to get them. What are your thoughts, Well.

0:18:05.400 --> 0:18:07.440
<v Speaker 2>You're one hundred percent right, your instincts are right, whether

0:18:07.480 --> 0:18:11.199
<v Speaker 2>lawyer or not. That's been the nature of things for

0:18:11.240 --> 0:18:13.400
<v Speaker 2>the past few years that we've seen. I don't think

0:18:13.400 --> 0:18:15.720
<v Speaker 2>we've ever seen anything like it. First of all, there

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:19.280
<v Speaker 2>are tremendous ethical violations in Bragg running for office on

0:18:19.320 --> 0:18:23.080
<v Speaker 2>a platform to get and target a particular citizen hadn't

0:18:23.080 --> 0:18:26.080
<v Speaker 2>been accused of anything. He promised to be the guy

0:18:26.119 --> 0:18:30.080
<v Speaker 2>to convict him. We saw that entire case unfold as

0:18:30.119 --> 0:18:33.800
<v Speaker 2>a complete mess, miscarriage of justice. Andrew Cuomo, who had

0:18:33.800 --> 0:18:36.040
<v Speaker 2>been the Attorney General New York and the governor of

0:18:36.080 --> 0:18:38.600
<v Speaker 2>New York, of course, and no Trump fan said that

0:18:38.600 --> 0:18:40.679
<v Speaker 2>had he been Attorney General, that case never would have

0:18:40.680 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 2>been brought. As you know the book out by Mark Pomerantz,

0:18:44.280 --> 0:18:47.639
<v Speaker 2>who had been appointed sort of special counsel to investigate it.

0:18:47.880 --> 0:18:52.640
<v Speaker 2>That office was against the prosecution until things changed politically,

0:18:52.720 --> 0:18:55.920
<v Speaker 2>so it became advantageous for Alvin Bragg in his view

0:18:55.960 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 2>at least to bring the case. The case of the travesty,

0:18:58.920 --> 0:19:01.239
<v Speaker 2>it will never hold up on appeal if it's not

0:19:01.359 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 2>dismissed outright. It should be dismissed, frankly, for a number

0:19:04.960 --> 0:19:07.760
<v Speaker 2>of reasons. Should be dismissed on presidential immunity ground that

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:12.160
<v Speaker 2>should be dismissed on the elected the election that just happened,

0:19:12.880 --> 0:19:16.639
<v Speaker 2>those immunity, that kind of immunity. But even if it

0:19:16.680 --> 0:19:19.720
<v Speaker 2>weren't dismissed on a bill, it has to be reversed

0:19:19.720 --> 0:19:24.399
<v Speaker 2>for a number of constitutional infirmities, including never identifying the

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 2>target crime that made a felony in the case, giving

0:19:27.280 --> 0:19:30.320
<v Speaker 2>a jury the choice and then not having them identify

0:19:30.359 --> 0:19:32.720
<v Speaker 2>what crime it was. But there are many other errors

0:19:32.760 --> 0:19:34.720
<v Speaker 2>in the case. The judge never should have sat on

0:19:34.760 --> 0:19:38.960
<v Speaker 2>the case, clear conflict of interest. It's an abomination. And

0:19:39.000 --> 0:19:41.480
<v Speaker 2>that's just one example. But you know you mentioned the others.

0:19:41.640 --> 0:19:44.880
<v Speaker 2>The others have all have infirmities of their own.

0:19:45.560 --> 0:19:48.760
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, it just it just astonishes me. And

0:19:49.040 --> 0:19:53.720
<v Speaker 1>as a layman, the question that I have is, how

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:57.080
<v Speaker 1>do we hold how does the system hold these people

0:19:57.119 --> 0:20:01.119
<v Speaker 1>who were doing this, the lawyers that whatever, whether it's

0:20:01.480 --> 0:20:05.040
<v Speaker 1>Leticia James, the Attorney General of New York, or Alvin

0:20:05.080 --> 0:20:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Bragg or Fanny Willis or whatever, how do they get

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:11.240
<v Speaker 1>to be held accountable for what they're doing or what

0:20:11.280 --> 0:20:12.200
<v Speaker 1>they have done.

0:20:13.080 --> 0:20:15.920
<v Speaker 2>It's a real problem in a situation like this, especially

0:20:15.960 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 2>because you know, you think that ultimately the check on

0:20:19.359 --> 0:20:22.200
<v Speaker 2>an abusive power is the ballot box. But if you're

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:27.159
<v Speaker 2>in the jurisdiction where the elected official is playing to

0:20:27.200 --> 0:20:32.239
<v Speaker 2>the worst instinct or human instincts. In that jurisdiction, they

0:20:32.280 --> 0:20:35.359
<v Speaker 2>don't like a particular person, they don't like someone because

0:20:35.400 --> 0:20:39.360
<v Speaker 2>of race or gender or some other reason, and they

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:42.960
<v Speaker 2>have an electric electorate filled with that kind of viewpoint,

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:45.720
<v Speaker 2>then the person can stay in office if you can

0:20:45.800 --> 0:20:50.080
<v Speaker 2>prove that you know their professional violations. For example, we

0:20:50.200 --> 0:20:53.600
<v Speaker 2>saw in the Georgia case with Fannie Willis. Now you

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:56.280
<v Speaker 2>know the Georgia Court of Appeal has removed her from

0:20:56.280 --> 0:20:59.800
<v Speaker 2>the case as she had to be. That's because you know, she,

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:03.400
<v Speaker 2>in her zeal to get President Trump and to advance

0:21:03.480 --> 0:21:06.879
<v Speaker 2>her interests in the interests of her lover, she really

0:21:06.920 --> 0:21:11.280
<v Speaker 2>overstepped the boundaries and created a clear appearance of impropriety

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:14.080
<v Speaker 2>and impartiality. As we moved from the case, and hopefully

0:21:14.080 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 2>that case is going to be dismissed. But you're right,

0:21:16.920 --> 0:21:19.639
<v Speaker 2>you know, you've identified a real problem. What do we

0:21:19.680 --> 0:21:22.720
<v Speaker 2>do to hold them accountable outside of the ballot box?

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Is this something that on the federal level, Congress can

0:21:27.160 --> 0:21:30.680
<v Speaker 1>deal with, or in a state, a state legislature can

0:21:30.720 --> 0:21:33.879
<v Speaker 1>deal with to change the rules and all that. You know,

0:21:33.960 --> 0:21:37.400
<v Speaker 1>one of the things that we're old enough to remember

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:43.840
<v Speaker 1>this is President Nixon's Watergate situation. And it has occurred

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:48.360
<v Speaker 1>to me more than once that once that occurred, then

0:21:48.520 --> 0:21:53.080
<v Speaker 1>all bets were off and every president, every public official

0:21:53.680 --> 0:21:57.160
<v Speaker 1>was going to be targeted or could easily be targeted

0:21:57.640 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 1>by prosecutors, because well, if they got Richard Nixon to

0:22:01.680 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 1>resign and almost you know, other than Gerald Ford's pardon,

0:22:06.200 --> 0:22:09.879
<v Speaker 1>he might have had more problems. What else would have

0:22:09.960 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 1>happened there. I keep having the feeling that opened the

0:22:13.000 --> 0:22:16.000
<v Speaker 1>floodgates for all kinds of conduct here on the part

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:18.440
<v Speaker 1>of the legal community, which is just not good.

0:22:19.920 --> 0:22:22.040
<v Speaker 2>I think that's absolutely right. And you know, we saw

0:22:22.080 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 2>in twenty nineteen Jerry Nadler, Democratic Congressman from New York

0:22:26.080 --> 0:22:28.679
<v Speaker 2>made this comment in the context of the first Trump

0:22:28.680 --> 0:22:32.879
<v Speaker 2>impeachment proceeding, and he said, basically, we can't trust the voters,

0:22:33.080 --> 0:22:35.359
<v Speaker 2>can't wait for another election. We have to find some

0:22:35.520 --> 0:22:38.360
<v Speaker 2>other way to get rid of President Trump in effect,

0:22:38.840 --> 0:22:42.159
<v Speaker 2>and that's about an anti democratic a statement as I

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:44.720
<v Speaker 2>can imagine from an elected official. You know, on the

0:22:44.720 --> 0:22:49.199
<v Speaker 2>one hand, with our separate branches of government, often we

0:22:49.359 --> 0:22:52.119
<v Speaker 2>like to see, you know, different parties having different branches

0:22:52.240 --> 0:22:54.960
<v Speaker 2>a sort of check on the other But in this case,

0:22:55.520 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 2>I think the President Trump provided the ultimate answer to

0:22:59.160 --> 0:23:02.400
<v Speaker 2>the unfair attacks. I think the American people have said

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:06.080
<v Speaker 2>this many times now, are basically a fair minded people

0:23:06.359 --> 0:23:07.119
<v Speaker 2>in the majority.

0:23:07.240 --> 0:23:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Yes, I think they got.

0:23:08.240 --> 0:23:10.480
<v Speaker 2>I think that this law fare and the weaponization of

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:13.840
<v Speaker 2>the criminal justice system was just too much for a

0:23:13.880 --> 0:23:17.359
<v Speaker 2>normal American person to take, and the backlash was seen

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:20.359
<v Speaker 2>through the ballot box, and so ultimately he gets the

0:23:20.400 --> 0:23:22.679
<v Speaker 2>last ward. President Trump gets the last word in this

0:23:22.720 --> 0:23:27.120
<v Speaker 2>because now he has both Houses of Congress and the presidency,

0:23:27.480 --> 0:23:29.960
<v Speaker 2>and so if someone's going to try to abuse the

0:23:29.960 --> 0:23:33.159
<v Speaker 2>impeachment process again as we saw last time, they're going

0:23:33.200 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 2>to have a tough rota hoo with the Republican Party

0:23:37.280 --> 0:23:39.160
<v Speaker 2>in both houses.

0:23:39.560 --> 0:23:44.920
<v Speaker 1>Yes, you know. Back in twenty fourteen, I interviewed then

0:23:44.960 --> 0:23:48.720
<v Speaker 1>private citizen Trump for The American Spectator, and one of

0:23:48.760 --> 0:23:53.280
<v Speaker 1>the things I said to him was that Republicans that

0:23:53.359 --> 0:23:55.440
<v Speaker 1>I had talked to, and mind you, this was after

0:23:55.480 --> 0:23:59.560
<v Speaker 1>the McCain and the Romney campaigns, was that they get

0:23:59.560 --> 0:24:04.719
<v Speaker 1>attacked by their opposition and so savagely, and yet they

0:24:04.760 --> 0:24:07.920
<v Speaker 1>don't fight back. And so I said to him, if

0:24:07.960 --> 0:24:11.120
<v Speaker 1>you run for president, will you fight back, to which

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:14.359
<v Speaker 1>his response was something like, Oh, don't worry about that.

0:24:14.920 --> 0:24:18.560
<v Speaker 1>I will fight back. Do you think we're just we're

0:24:18.640 --> 0:24:23.199
<v Speaker 1>fortunate that we've got somebody here who is just not

0:24:23.280 --> 0:24:25.400
<v Speaker 1>going to let people get away with it as opposed

0:24:25.440 --> 0:24:28.200
<v Speaker 1>to just rolling over here. I mean, I can only

0:24:28.240 --> 0:24:31.600
<v Speaker 1>imagine the conversations that you that you and his staff

0:24:31.640 --> 0:24:37.440
<v Speaker 1>and friends have had with him. I saw him in Johnstown,

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:41.080
<v Speaker 1>Pennsylvania during the campaign, and because I know him that

0:24:41.200 --> 0:24:43.040
<v Speaker 1>they asked if I would come out and talk to him.

0:24:43.040 --> 0:24:46.680
<v Speaker 1>I did, and I have to say, David, I was standing,

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:48.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, like almost nose to nose with and I'm

0:24:48.840 --> 0:24:50.640
<v Speaker 1>sort of tilting my head a little bit to see

0:24:50.640 --> 0:24:53.840
<v Speaker 1>the condition of his ear where he'd been shot, and

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:56.520
<v Speaker 1>he notices and and I said, are you all right?

0:24:56.640 --> 0:24:59.320
<v Speaker 1>He said, yeah, I'm doing great. I'm doing just great.

0:24:59.359 --> 0:25:02.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm fine, And then he went out on stage and

0:25:02.119 --> 0:25:06.639
<v Speaker 1>delivered this, you know, incredible speech that had thousands of

0:25:06.640 --> 0:25:10.840
<v Speaker 1>people all set to go. I have never seen anything

0:25:10.960 --> 0:25:12.879
<v Speaker 1>like this, and I worked for President Reagan and have

0:25:12.960 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 1>been around my share of people like this, but wow,

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I just think he's amazing when he comes to this.

0:25:19.600 --> 0:25:23.280
<v Speaker 1>But it's also very helpful because otherwise they're going to

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:24.359
<v Speaker 1>try and bring him down.

0:25:25.359 --> 0:25:28.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah. Well, I mean that was an iconic moment. I'm

0:25:28.359 --> 0:25:31.359
<v Speaker 2>sorry to say I didn't really recognize the gravity of

0:25:31.359 --> 0:25:34.159
<v Speaker 2>the situation at the time, and my initial reaction was

0:25:34.200 --> 0:25:36.399
<v Speaker 2>to trash talk him a little bit about you know,

0:25:36.400 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 2>I got a little graves wound on the ear sort

0:25:38.320 --> 0:25:42.200
<v Speaker 2>of thing. But he took it very well and gave

0:25:42.200 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 2>it back. But no, look, I think I personally think

0:25:46.240 --> 0:25:49.120
<v Speaker 2>that the toughness. First of all, it's real, but secondly,

0:25:49.200 --> 0:25:52.560
<v Speaker 2>I think it plays best in our foreign affairs quite frankly.

0:25:53.080 --> 0:25:55.800
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we've seen it already. We've just now, you know,

0:25:55.960 --> 0:26:00.320
<v Speaker 2>backing off publicly of some of our arch enemies. And

0:26:00.440 --> 0:26:02.560
<v Speaker 2>they know that he means business. And part of it

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:05.439
<v Speaker 2>is the unpredictability. They don't know what he's going to do,

0:26:05.480 --> 0:26:07.320
<v Speaker 2>but they know what he's capable of doing if he

0:26:07.400 --> 0:26:10.000
<v Speaker 2>decides to in terms of sort of payback. You know. Look,

0:26:10.040 --> 0:26:12.920
<v Speaker 2>I hope that doesn't dominate the agenda. I think though

0:26:12.920 --> 0:26:15.480
<v Speaker 2>he learned a great lesson over these last four years

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:18.600
<v Speaker 2>and the four years administration. Remember, they tried to sideline

0:26:18.680 --> 0:26:23.040
<v Speaker 2>him with this phony Mueller so called investigation that really

0:26:23.119 --> 0:26:25.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, it wasn't fair to the country. It handcuffed

0:26:25.400 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 2>the country, and then we got COVID, and so now

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:32.320
<v Speaker 2>he gets to start anew Listen. He made the decision,

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:35.520
<v Speaker 2>constant conscious decision at the beginning of his last administration

0:26:35.920 --> 0:26:39.280
<v Speaker 2>not to prosecute Hillary Clinton, despite the evidence of what

0:26:39.359 --> 0:26:42.360
<v Speaker 2>she did with her computer, you know, and so on.

0:26:42.480 --> 0:26:46.080
<v Speaker 2>You know, any criminal defense lawyer has had clients who

0:26:46.080 --> 0:26:48.880
<v Speaker 2>were indicted for a lot less in terms of obstruction

0:26:48.960 --> 0:26:51.520
<v Speaker 2>of justice and evidence tampering and that sort of thing.

0:26:51.760 --> 0:26:53.439
<v Speaker 2>But he made that decision. I don't know if he

0:26:53.440 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 2>would make that same decision today, and he was believing,

0:26:56.040 --> 0:26:57.520
<v Speaker 2>you know, he got a lot of pressure all of that.

0:26:57.600 --> 0:26:58.640
<v Speaker 2>Locker up, locker up.

0:27:00.600 --> 0:27:03.480
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I remember my share of rallies where I would

0:27:03.720 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 1>do that in twenty sixteen. It was pretty amazing. Well,

0:27:09.640 --> 0:27:11.399
<v Speaker 1>I guess. And one of the other things that I

0:27:11.440 --> 0:27:14.679
<v Speaker 1>think sort of comes from this as well is that

0:27:14.760 --> 0:27:20.359
<v Speaker 1>he's become a role model for foreign leaders. And you know,

0:27:20.480 --> 0:27:24.160
<v Speaker 1>trump Ism, if as you might call it, is surging

0:27:24.200 --> 0:27:28.040
<v Speaker 1>in places like you know, Europe and France and South

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:29.959
<v Speaker 1>America and all of this kind of thing, which I

0:27:30.000 --> 0:27:32.919
<v Speaker 1>find very interesting. You know, it's democracy, but you have

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:35.480
<v Speaker 1>to have a strong leader. And I think that they've

0:27:35.520 --> 0:27:38.639
<v Speaker 1>really responded. I don't think there's any accident that he

0:27:38.720 --> 0:27:42.080
<v Speaker 1>was invited to France just as president elect for the

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:46.800
<v Speaker 1>anniversary or the celebration of the redoing of the Cathedral

0:27:46.800 --> 0:27:51.480
<v Speaker 1>of Notre Dame, and President Matron went out of his

0:27:51.640 --> 0:27:55.359
<v Speaker 1>way to treat him as if he were already the

0:27:55.400 --> 0:27:58.200
<v Speaker 1>sitting president. I think that's pretty amazing right there.

0:27:59.040 --> 0:28:02.520
<v Speaker 2>Oh, you make very points with this, I think, but

0:28:02.680 --> 0:28:04.800
<v Speaker 2>we're seeing it, you know, kind of across the board

0:28:05.080 --> 0:28:07.119
<v Speaker 2>and the other The flip side of it is, in

0:28:07.160 --> 0:28:09.879
<v Speaker 2>each of these situations, the media, and I say the

0:28:09.920 --> 0:28:12.560
<v Speaker 2>media that's reflected in the New York Times, the Washington

0:28:12.600 --> 0:28:17.040
<v Speaker 2>Post plays out these doomsday scenarios. The world leaders hate them.

0:28:17.119 --> 0:28:18.960
<v Speaker 2>World leaders don't hate them. The first of all, they

0:28:18.960 --> 0:28:21.360
<v Speaker 2>love the guy on many levels, but they respect him,

0:28:21.520 --> 0:28:23.920
<v Speaker 2>they fear him in some ways, and they want to

0:28:23.920 --> 0:28:25.520
<v Speaker 2>be like him. They want to be, you know, that

0:28:25.600 --> 0:28:27.720
<v Speaker 2>kind of leader for many of them. But you know,

0:28:27.760 --> 0:28:30.200
<v Speaker 2>we see these doomsday reports. If he were to move

0:28:30.320 --> 0:28:34.160
<v Speaker 2>the Israeli of the United States embassy in Israel to Jerusalem,

0:28:34.200 --> 0:28:36.359
<v Speaker 2>it would be armageddon. Well, he did it because it

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:38.000
<v Speaker 2>was the right thing to do. It's the thing the

0:28:38.120 --> 0:28:40.760
<v Speaker 2>law requires him to do, and he wanted to do it,

0:28:40.920 --> 0:28:43.719
<v Speaker 2>and it turned out to be the perfect decision. The

0:28:43.760 --> 0:28:47.000
<v Speaker 2>Abraham Accords then arose from that. Now we were told

0:28:47.080 --> 0:28:49.480
<v Speaker 2>those would be impossible, we could never make peace with

0:28:49.560 --> 0:28:52.280
<v Speaker 2>these countries, never have dialogue with them. But he went

0:28:52.320 --> 0:28:54.920
<v Speaker 2>out and did it. Now, you remember, when they Biden

0:28:54.960 --> 0:28:57.520
<v Speaker 2>administration came in, there was apparently a ban on using

0:28:57.560 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 2>the term Abraham Accords. I read it for any of

0:29:01.440 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 2>these things which they said he couldn't do, and he

0:29:03.680 --> 0:29:05.640
<v Speaker 2>did them all. So I'm hoping to see a lot

0:29:05.680 --> 0:29:09.080
<v Speaker 2>more positive things along those lines, you know, with this administration,

0:29:09.160 --> 0:29:10.800
<v Speaker 2>and it comes through strength, as.

0:29:10.640 --> 0:29:11.560
<v Speaker 1>You say, yes, it does.

0:29:11.800 --> 0:29:11.920
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:29:12.160 --> 0:29:14.720
<v Speaker 1>I can give you an anecdote from my Reagan days.

0:29:14.800 --> 0:29:18.600
<v Speaker 1>In August of nineteen eighty one, the federal air traffic

0:29:18.600 --> 0:29:22.400
<v Speaker 1>controllers threatened threatened to go on strike, which was against

0:29:22.480 --> 0:29:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the law, and the whole Washington Press Corps was, well,

0:29:25.320 --> 0:29:27.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, you can't do anything about this, and Reagan

0:29:27.320 --> 0:29:30.640
<v Speaker 1>came out and said, if you do this, I will

0:29:30.680 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 1>fire you. Well, they didn't believe him. He did it,

0:29:33.880 --> 0:29:36.440
<v Speaker 1>they fired, he fired him, and lo and behold. We

0:29:36.560 --> 0:29:39.240
<v Speaker 1>later found out that who paid real close attention to

0:29:39.280 --> 0:29:40.640
<v Speaker 1>this the Soviet Union.

0:29:42.600 --> 0:29:42.840
<v Speaker 2>YEP.

0:29:43.560 --> 0:29:46.960
<v Speaker 1>So well, thank you very much, David. This has been

0:29:47.320 --> 0:29:50.080
<v Speaker 1>a great conversation. I think the next four years are

0:29:50.080 --> 0:29:54.040
<v Speaker 1>going to be remarkable, and I'm looking forward to your

0:29:54.080 --> 0:29:57.360
<v Speaker 1>involvement with it, and the American people will be well

0:29:57.400 --> 0:30:01.560
<v Speaker 1>served if you were there. This is Jeffrey Lord sitting

0:30:01.560 --> 0:30:04.280
<v Speaker 1>in for Sean Hannity, and our calling number is eight

0:30:04.400 --> 0:30:09.160
<v Speaker 1>hundred and nine for one seven three two six. All Right,

0:30:09.240 --> 0:30:12.720
<v Speaker 1>this is Jeffrey Lord sitting in for our friend Sean Hannity,

0:30:13.080 --> 0:30:17.080
<v Speaker 1>and our number here is eight hundred and nine four

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:21.200
<v Speaker 1>one seven three two six. We invite you to call in.

0:30:21.760 --> 0:30:25.160
<v Speaker 1>We have just about a minute here before we get

0:30:25.160 --> 0:30:27.560
<v Speaker 1>into our heartbreak, and I just thought i'd use that

0:30:27.720 --> 0:30:31.920
<v Speaker 1>even though we are a few days past Christmas, I

0:30:32.000 --> 0:30:35.320
<v Speaker 1>did go through for the American Spectator before Christmas a

0:30:35.400 --> 0:30:39.200
<v Speaker 1>list of conservative books for Christmas. And even though Christmas

0:30:39.200 --> 0:30:42.360
<v Speaker 1>may be over, you could buy it for somebody's New

0:30:42.440 --> 0:30:46.920
<v Speaker 1>Year's gift or what have you. So I'll probably mention

0:30:47.040 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 1>this a little bit later in the show here, but

0:30:49.120 --> 0:30:51.880
<v Speaker 1>we have some great books out there, new books in

0:30:51.920 --> 0:30:55.480
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty four, and also some old books that are

0:30:55.520 --> 0:31:00.000
<v Speaker 1>the classics, like from Bill Buckley. Okay, so that is great,

0:31:00.160 --> 0:31:02.040
<v Speaker 1>and we will be back in a few minutes. That

0:31:02.080 --> 0:31:06.040
<v Speaker 1>This is Geoffrey Lord filling in for Sean Hannity, and

0:31:06.400 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 1>the number again is eight hundred ninety four one seven

0:31:08.920 --> 0:31:09.720
<v Speaker 1>three two six.