WEBVTT - Hunter Biden, Eli Lilly, CAVA, and Geopolitics (Podcast)

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:02.560
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast.

0:00:02.720 --> 0:00:03.480
<v Speaker 2>I'm Paul Sweeney.

0:00:03.520 --> 0:00:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Alongside my co host Matt Miller.

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:09.600
<v Speaker 3>Every business day, we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:13.640
<v Speaker 3>and Bloomberg experts, along with essential market moving news.

0:00:14.160 --> 0:00:17.279
<v Speaker 1>Find the Bloomberg Markets Podcast on Apple Podcasts or wherever

0:00:17.360 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>you listen to podcasts, and at Bloomberg dot com Slash podcast.

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:23.520
<v Speaker 1>A lot of news out of Washington, DCT on the

0:00:23.640 --> 0:00:26.640
<v Speaker 1>legal front. I mean we started off the day looks

0:00:26.640 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 1>like President Trump faces an August twenty twenty three trial

0:00:30.440 --> 0:00:33.280
<v Speaker 1>in the classified documents case, so we've got some clarity there.

0:00:33.920 --> 0:00:36.239
<v Speaker 1>Then just breaking recently, Hunter Biden de plete guilty to

0:00:36.320 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 1>tax charges. So we want to get to the bottom

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:41.080
<v Speaker 1>of this news coming out of Washington. Nick Ackerman, former

0:00:41.080 --> 0:00:43.599
<v Speaker 1>assistant special Watergate prosecutor, joins us.

0:00:43.800 --> 0:00:43.959
<v Speaker 4>Nick.

0:00:44.040 --> 0:00:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with the news first on President Trump. If

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:51.520
<v Speaker 1>nothing else, it's he's going to receive a speedy trial,

0:00:51.520 --> 0:00:53.880
<v Speaker 1>if you will. I mean, this is happening very quickly.

0:00:54.640 --> 0:00:57.480
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, no, I mean Florida, the southern district of Florida

0:00:57.560 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 5>is known for its rocket dockets, and clearly he's on there,

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:03.600
<v Speaker 5>and I think it answers a lot of questions that

0:01:03.640 --> 0:01:07.520
<v Speaker 5>people were concerned about with this particular Judge Cannon, who

0:01:07.600 --> 0:01:10.560
<v Speaker 5>wasn't a Trump appointee, that somehow she would drag this

0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:13.399
<v Speaker 5>out and delay it for Trump. That is not going

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:17.160
<v Speaker 5>to happen. I think one of the overriding themes that

0:01:17.240 --> 0:01:20.080
<v Speaker 5>comes out of our news this morning is really the

0:01:20.160 --> 0:01:23.480
<v Speaker 5>rule of law and how it has been enforced with

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:26.600
<v Speaker 5>both of these developments today. One you've got a Trump

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:30.160
<v Speaker 5>appointee as a judge who is moving this case along

0:01:30.240 --> 0:01:33.480
<v Speaker 5>and bringing it to trial. And two you've got the

0:01:33.560 --> 0:01:37.720
<v Speaker 5>Hunter Biden a guilty plead that was done and overseen

0:01:37.959 --> 0:01:42.040
<v Speaker 5>by a former Trump appointee as US Attorney in Delaware

0:01:42.280 --> 0:01:45.640
<v Speaker 5>who was purposely kept on in order to deal with

0:01:45.680 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 5>this matter, and he had the final ultimate decision as

0:01:49.880 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 5>to how it would be taken care of. The Attorney

0:01:53.200 --> 0:01:56.160
<v Speaker 5>General kept himself out of it for fear of some

0:01:56.360 --> 0:01:58.720
<v Speaker 5>kind of a conflict between the fact that he was

0:01:58.760 --> 0:02:03.960
<v Speaker 5>appointed by President Biden and he would be making the decision. Instead,

0:02:04.280 --> 0:02:10.040
<v Speaker 5>he delegated it completely to this Trump appointed US attorney,

0:02:10.680 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 5>And in the same way, the decision to indict Donald

0:02:14.520 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 5>Trump on the classified document case was delegated to a

0:02:19.080 --> 0:02:23.720
<v Speaker 5>special prosecutor that was totally out of the politics and

0:02:24.520 --> 0:02:28.040
<v Speaker 5>was removed from the attorney general. So I think today

0:02:28.160 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 5>was a good day for the rule of law.

0:02:30.840 --> 0:02:34.839
<v Speaker 6>So, Nick, has the Biden administration responded to either case yet?

0:02:36.160 --> 0:02:38.600
<v Speaker 5>I know, and there's no reason for them to. I mean,

0:02:38.639 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 5>they have should have absolutely nothing to do with either case.

0:02:43.200 --> 0:02:46.960
<v Speaker 5>It's important that they keep their distance and that the

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:51.000
<v Speaker 5>public understands that the decisions being made on this case

0:02:51.040 --> 0:02:56.080
<v Speaker 5>are being made by totally independent individuals, whether the prosecutors

0:02:56.240 --> 0:02:57.000
<v Speaker 5>or the judges.

0:02:58.080 --> 0:03:00.960
<v Speaker 1>So all right, Nick, let's I guess focus on, presumably

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:02.799
<v Speaker 1>what is the more important case here.

0:03:03.320 --> 0:03:04.440
<v Speaker 2>What is your expectation.

0:03:04.560 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is going only going to be They

0:03:06.200 --> 0:03:10.720
<v Speaker 1>announced a two week trial, so that seems very expeditious

0:03:10.720 --> 0:03:13.800
<v Speaker 1>if nothing else, How do you expect this to play out?

0:03:14.760 --> 0:03:14.919
<v Speaker 4>Oh?

0:03:15.200 --> 0:03:17.040
<v Speaker 5>I think it's likely to play out just the way

0:03:17.080 --> 0:03:18.600
<v Speaker 5>she's got it set up. I mean, there may be

0:03:18.639 --> 0:03:21.840
<v Speaker 5>a little bit of a delay in here, but this

0:03:21.919 --> 0:03:25.760
<v Speaker 5>is not a difficult case. It's fairly straightforward. The number

0:03:25.760 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 5>of classified documents I think is somewhere around thirty that

0:03:28.919 --> 0:03:32.960
<v Speaker 5>are an issue here. There's testimony by witnesses, there's going

0:03:33.000 --> 0:03:36.400
<v Speaker 5>to be pre trial motions, all of which are, for

0:03:36.440 --> 0:03:38.000
<v Speaker 5>the most part, as far as I can tell, it

0:03:38.040 --> 0:03:40.760
<v Speaker 5>pretty frivolous and will take no time to dispose of.

0:03:41.320 --> 0:03:44.200
<v Speaker 5>So there's no reason why this case can't be put

0:03:44.280 --> 0:03:48.360
<v Speaker 5>on trial in August. I mean, this judge is spot on.

0:03:48.480 --> 0:03:50.320
<v Speaker 5>This is the way the case ought to be handled.

0:03:50.520 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 1>Nick, Should we expect a plea deal from president former

0:03:55.320 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>president Trump's campus that's something that we should expect, or

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:00.800
<v Speaker 1>do you think he prefers or he should go to trial?

0:04:01.760 --> 0:04:03.800
<v Speaker 5>Well, I think he's a fool to go to trial

0:04:03.920 --> 0:04:06.960
<v Speaker 5>because the evidence, at least as it's set forth in

0:04:07.000 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 5>the indictment, is extraordinarily powerful, and his statements, even his

0:04:13.240 --> 0:04:16.360
<v Speaker 5>statement last night on Fox News, he keeps digging himself

0:04:16.440 --> 0:04:20.600
<v Speaker 5>in deeper to this and creating more fodder for the

0:04:20.760 --> 0:04:24.680
<v Speaker 5>prosecution in the case. The best thing that I would

0:04:24.720 --> 0:04:27.640
<v Speaker 5>advise any client to do under these circumstances is to

0:04:27.680 --> 0:04:31.480
<v Speaker 5>somehow get a plea deal. But knowing Donald Trump, I'd

0:04:31.480 --> 0:04:32.720
<v Speaker 5>say that's pretty unlikely.

0:04:33.200 --> 0:04:36.000
<v Speaker 6>How does this affect the election.

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:39.799
<v Speaker 5>Well, that's the whole point. If this case is done

0:04:40.040 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 5>by early September, it's not going to affect the election

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:47.520
<v Speaker 5>at all. I mean, if he's convicted. You know, good

0:04:47.600 --> 0:04:50.400
<v Speaker 5>luck to the Republican Party if they want to nominate

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:58.880
<v Speaker 5>somebody for president who's convicted for mishandling and obstructing classified documents.

0:04:58.880 --> 0:05:02.080
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I just don't see that happening here, so

0:05:02.120 --> 0:05:06.080
<v Speaker 5>I think it by doing this on this schedule, this,

0:05:06.080 --> 0:05:08.880
<v Speaker 5>this is a good thing in terms of the election.

0:05:09.480 --> 0:05:10.599
<v Speaker 1>Nick, thanks so much for joining us.

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:12.400
<v Speaker 2>Really appreciate it. Jumping on with us.

0:05:12.600 --> 0:05:16.600
<v Speaker 1>Nick Ackerman, former assistant special Watergate prosecutor, giving us his

0:05:16.720 --> 0:05:20.279
<v Speaker 1>thoughts and analysis on what's been some pretty busy news front.

0:05:20.279 --> 0:05:24.080
<v Speaker 7>This morning, you're listening to the Team Ken's are Live

0:05:24.160 --> 0:05:27.600
<v Speaker 7>program Bloomberg Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern.

0:05:27.360 --> 0:05:30.440
<v Speaker 8>On Bloomberg dot Com, the iHeartRadio.

0:05:29.720 --> 0:05:32.480
<v Speaker 7>App, and the Bloomberg Business App, or listen on demand

0:05:32.520 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 7>wherever you get your podcast.

0:05:36.080 --> 0:05:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Jess Met and Paul Sweene Here in the Bloomberg Interactive

0:05:38.080 --> 0:05:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Brokers Studio, we're streaming live on YouTube starting today.

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:44.160
<v Speaker 2>You can go check that out. Jess.

0:05:44.240 --> 0:05:46.560
<v Speaker 1>You know I've said it before, I'll say it again.

0:05:46.600 --> 0:05:47.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, my next life, I want to come back

0:05:47.920 --> 0:05:50.359
<v Speaker 1>as a care m and a bank because this just

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:54.640
<v Speaker 1>deals left and right. We've got another one today, Lily

0:05:55.000 --> 0:05:57.600
<v Speaker 1>to pay two point four Yeah, two point four billion

0:05:57.640 --> 0:06:01.000
<v Speaker 1>dollars for immune drug developer Dice. Breaking down force is

0:06:01.000 --> 0:06:03.480
<v Speaker 1>our good friend Sam Vizzelli. He's head of European Research.

0:06:03.839 --> 0:06:06.680
<v Speaker 1>He's also got a side hustle where he's presumably reportedly

0:06:06.720 --> 0:06:11.039
<v Speaker 1>a pharmaceuticals analyst for Bloomberg Intelligence. So we'll check in

0:06:11.040 --> 0:06:12.920
<v Speaker 1>with Sam. Sam, thanks so much for joining us here again,

0:06:12.960 --> 0:06:17.080
<v Speaker 1>another deal here for Lily. You know your big farmer companies.

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:19.599
<v Speaker 1>I know they do a lot of R and D, Sam,

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:22.279
<v Speaker 1>but boy, they're really active on the M and A front,

0:06:22.320 --> 0:06:25.560
<v Speaker 1>buying drugs and therap therapies. What are they getting here

0:06:25.560 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>with Dice?

0:06:27.080 --> 0:06:29.880
<v Speaker 4>Hey, Paul, just just one comment before we go to Dice.

0:06:30.279 --> 0:06:33.479
<v Speaker 9>I think your life as a media analyst back in

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 9>the days wasn't that bad, was it?

0:06:35.200 --> 0:06:35.640
<v Speaker 4>No? It was.

0:06:36.640 --> 0:06:38.479
<v Speaker 2>We had a good role there for a while.

0:06:39.320 --> 0:06:42.160
<v Speaker 4>Oh yes, No, so Dice.

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:46.120
<v Speaker 9>Basically, what Lily is doing here is that it's acquiring

0:06:46.240 --> 0:06:53.359
<v Speaker 9>a novel therapeutic approach or novel drug development approach to

0:06:54.040 --> 0:06:58.120
<v Speaker 9>treating dermatological disease. In this particular case, I think the

0:06:58.120 --> 0:07:00.800
<v Speaker 9>target's going to be a psariasis, which I think a

0:07:00.839 --> 0:07:04.599
<v Speaker 9>lot of people are familiar with in which Lily's already active.

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:06.920
<v Speaker 4>So they have a product called Tolts.

0:07:06.960 --> 0:07:10.480
<v Speaker 9>It's doing really well, but it's coming off patent in

0:07:10.520 --> 0:07:15.000
<v Speaker 9>twenty in the late twenties, let's say, and it does

0:07:15.080 --> 0:07:18.280
<v Speaker 9>make sense for them to be backing into it other products.

0:07:18.280 --> 0:07:22.200
<v Speaker 9>And let's not forget a lot of farmer company products

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:26.560
<v Speaker 9>to fifty percent of them originate outside of the farmer company.

0:07:26.640 --> 0:07:31.520
<v Speaker 9>You can't own every science, every new methodology for developing drugs,

0:07:31.680 --> 0:07:33.960
<v Speaker 9>which is something that Dice has got a new approach

0:07:34.000 --> 0:07:38.120
<v Speaker 9>to doing small molecule pill type drugs. So that's what

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 9>I think we got. We're seeing and we continue to see.

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 6>Sam. How are investors reacting to this? Because if you

0:07:43.760 --> 0:07:47.480
<v Speaker 6>look at shares of Dice as tickersymbol DIICE up about

0:07:47.520 --> 0:07:51.120
<v Speaker 6>thirty eight percent on Peaceport's best days since October of

0:07:51.280 --> 0:07:54.000
<v Speaker 6>last year. Looking at Eli Lillly tickersymbol l l Y

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:55.160
<v Speaker 6>up about one percent.

0:07:56.200 --> 0:07:59.080
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, well, so, I mean usually the acquired when they're

0:07:59.080 --> 0:08:01.760
<v Speaker 9>doing such a small de Let's not forget Eli Lee. Now,

0:08:01.800 --> 0:08:04.679
<v Speaker 9>at least last time I checked, was the largest farmer

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:07.920
<v Speaker 9>company in the world. They overtook Johnson and Johnson. Although

0:08:07.920 --> 0:08:11.040
<v Speaker 9>I think they're vying for that position like who's the

0:08:11.040 --> 0:08:13.000
<v Speaker 9>wealthiest man in the world kind of situation.

0:08:14.480 --> 0:08:17.160
<v Speaker 4>But so, really, what difference does it make to them?

0:08:17.240 --> 0:08:19.280
<v Speaker 9>Yes, it changes a little bit of the dynamics of

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:26.040
<v Speaker 9>potential downside in their immunology franchises and rices franchise seven

0:08:26.160 --> 0:08:26.640
<v Speaker 9>years at.

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:28.000
<v Speaker 4>Down the road. Great planning.

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:30.720
<v Speaker 9>But what really is driving in the stock today is

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:33.640
<v Speaker 9>the excitement around as we all know, obesity, diabetes, and

0:08:33.679 --> 0:08:37.840
<v Speaker 9>Alzheimer's disease. So this is not surprising to me the

0:08:37.840 --> 0:08:40.680
<v Speaker 9>way the share prices that mod What is interesting is

0:08:40.679 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 9>that the share price I'm just watching it now on

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:43.840
<v Speaker 9>my screen here for Dyce.

0:08:44.080 --> 0:08:45.720
<v Speaker 4>This company presented.

0:08:45.360 --> 0:08:49.120
<v Speaker 9>Data for this drug way back in nine months ago

0:08:49.160 --> 0:08:52.240
<v Speaker 9>October last year, and it's interesting that it's taken this

0:08:52.440 --> 0:08:54.480
<v Speaker 9>long for them to be taken out. And I have

0:08:54.520 --> 0:08:56.880
<v Speaker 9>to also say it's not the biggest premium I've seen

0:08:57.440 --> 0:08:58.400
<v Speaker 9>with recent deals.

0:08:58.400 --> 0:09:00.240
<v Speaker 4>So Mark bought Prometheus for.

0:09:00.240 --> 0:09:03.960
<v Speaker 9>Around a seventy seventy five percent premium, and the Chinook

0:09:04.400 --> 0:09:07.120
<v Speaker 9>was acquired or at least announced to be acquired by

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:10.480
<v Speaker 9>Novartists just a few days ago last week for a

0:09:10.559 --> 0:09:14.040
<v Speaker 9>sixty six percent premium or sixty percent premium depending on

0:09:14.080 --> 0:09:16.720
<v Speaker 9>where you start so at this thirty eight percent premium

0:09:16.800 --> 0:09:19.839
<v Speaker 9>is not the biggest we've seen, and it does make

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:22.800
<v Speaker 9>me wonder how why this it took so long for

0:09:22.840 --> 0:09:26.160
<v Speaker 9>somebody like Lily to actually close the deal, and perhaps

0:09:26.160 --> 0:09:27.240
<v Speaker 9>they could have paid less.

0:09:27.280 --> 0:09:28.000
<v Speaker 4>Who knows?

0:09:28.280 --> 0:09:30.720
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Sam, talk to us about kind of that risk

0:09:30.840 --> 0:09:34.320
<v Speaker 1>for patent expirations. I mean, I know you guys as

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:37.280
<v Speaker 1>analysts and investors, you probably follow that closely, are there.

0:09:38.000 --> 0:09:39.599
<v Speaker 2>Do you have a pretty good certainty.

0:09:39.240 --> 0:09:42.200
<v Speaker 1>When drugs come off patent and then when that revenue

0:09:42.240 --> 0:09:45.280
<v Speaker 1>may be a risk, And are certain companies more vulnerable

0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:46.960
<v Speaker 1>to that risk than than others?

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:50.880
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I think, Paul, it happens that sometimes some companies

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:53.760
<v Speaker 9>go through a wave of them and then others are

0:09:53.800 --> 0:09:55.920
<v Speaker 9>pretty immune for a while to go yet, and I

0:09:55.960 --> 0:09:59.600
<v Speaker 9>think Lily is one of those that's relatively immune. Pfizer,

0:09:59.640 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 9>I think, more exposure than others currently, But then of

0:10:03.520 --> 0:10:05.440
<v Speaker 9>course they come and go and then they move on

0:10:05.480 --> 0:10:10.040
<v Speaker 9>to a new base. And with patterns, yes, it's relatively

0:10:10.400 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 9>relatively easy because you can get fantastic pattern analysts like

0:10:14.440 --> 0:10:17.920
<v Speaker 9>our own old Girsbacker who digs deep on these things

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:20.560
<v Speaker 9>to try and guestimate when the patent expirer would come.

0:10:20.840 --> 0:10:23.000
<v Speaker 4>What has muddied the water here.

0:10:22.840 --> 0:10:27.360
<v Speaker 9>Of course, is the Inflation Reduction Act, which is saying

0:10:27.800 --> 0:10:30.920
<v Speaker 9>that some of your drugs, especially these small molecules, these

0:10:30.920 --> 0:10:34.800
<v Speaker 9>pills that I've been talking about, will be negotiated in

0:10:34.880 --> 0:10:37.120
<v Speaker 9>terms of price to get them into a world that

0:10:37.200 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 9>looks like as if they're becoming generic in terms of

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:43.600
<v Speaker 9>pricing way before the patent expires. And so that creates

0:10:43.720 --> 0:10:47.360
<v Speaker 9>an extra layer of uncertainty, which is why I'm actually

0:10:47.480 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 9>quite interested in this deal today because it is a

0:10:50.040 --> 0:10:52.600
<v Speaker 9>small molecule dealer, it is a pill, and it does

0:10:52.679 --> 0:10:53.839
<v Speaker 9>fall into the IRA.

0:10:53.760 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 6>Trap, same with healthcare. Deer deals on a tear this year.

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:00.960
<v Speaker 6>Is this a sign of optimist in the M and

0:11:01.000 --> 0:11:01.480
<v Speaker 6>A market?

0:11:02.920 --> 0:11:04.280
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, it's interesting, isn't it?

0:11:05.080 --> 0:11:07.360
<v Speaker 9>If you think back to last year interest rates pretty

0:11:07.400 --> 0:11:10.000
<v Speaker 9>much close to zero here and there, it was a

0:11:10.040 --> 0:11:13.360
<v Speaker 9>deal that these are not big numbers. You know, three

0:11:13.400 --> 0:11:16.320
<v Speaker 9>billion dollars. What's that to a four hundred billion dollar company?

0:11:16.760 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 9>But it does it's make me kind of chuck a

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:22.559
<v Speaker 9>little bit when interest rates are shooting up, But you

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:26.200
<v Speaker 9>think that MNA would be less likely. These companies are

0:11:26.200 --> 0:11:28.559
<v Speaker 9>stepping in into introduers, which of course, it's telling you

0:11:28.840 --> 0:11:31.320
<v Speaker 9>that they don't need any debt to do this. I mean,

0:11:31.960 --> 0:11:33.440
<v Speaker 9>Lily is very clear. He said, we're just going to

0:11:33.440 --> 0:11:36.880
<v Speaker 9>finance this through our massive cash flow. So what is

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:38.880
<v Speaker 9>happening though, is that I think they're coming to a

0:11:38.880 --> 0:11:41.000
<v Speaker 9>point of thinking more and more.

0:11:41.240 --> 0:11:44.000
<v Speaker 4>Valuations are where they are. They haven't moved very much.

0:11:44.080 --> 0:11:46.559
<v Speaker 9>They've taken their time, and they're finding the assets that

0:11:47.000 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 9>they feel are the right quality for their pipelines.

0:11:50.200 --> 0:11:53.840
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Sam, as analysts and investors in these pharma companies,

0:11:54.080 --> 0:11:58.360
<v Speaker 1>does a market care whether you know, the the Lilies

0:11:58.400 --> 0:11:59.800
<v Speaker 1>of the world, the marks of the world, whether they

0:11:59.840 --> 0:12:02.920
<v Speaker 1>do all of their therapeutics and drugs internally via R

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:04.680
<v Speaker 1>and D or they go out and buy it, do

0:12:04.720 --> 0:12:05.440
<v Speaker 1>you guys even care?

0:12:06.240 --> 0:12:07.960
<v Speaker 4>No, not really at the end of the day.

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:10.280
<v Speaker 9>I mean, obviously, if the R and D engine of

0:12:10.320 --> 0:12:12.120
<v Speaker 9>the company they were spending ten billion a year and

0:12:12.120 --> 0:12:14.440
<v Speaker 9>they were getting nothing out of it, that's not a

0:12:14.440 --> 0:12:17.320
<v Speaker 9>good thing. But let's not forget this product isn't done yet.

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:19.600
<v Speaker 9>It still needs to go through. What a lot of

0:12:19.600 --> 0:12:23.760
<v Speaker 9>people don't think about or contemplate is that it's not

0:12:23.840 --> 0:12:27.040
<v Speaker 9>just about discovering a molecule. It's about then manufacturing it.

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:29.440
<v Speaker 9>Make sure you've got the right manufacturing footprint, make sure

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 9>you've got the right package.

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 4>To go to the FDA, et cetera, et cetera.

0:12:33.520 --> 0:12:35.400
<v Speaker 9>So there's a lot of R and D that still

0:12:35.440 --> 0:12:37.840
<v Speaker 9>needs to go in here that Lily will be spending

0:12:38.240 --> 0:12:42.920
<v Speaker 9>on this product. So but nobody really cares as long

0:12:42.960 --> 0:12:46.199
<v Speaker 9>as internal R and D, which is where the Munjaro

0:12:46.320 --> 0:12:49.360
<v Speaker 9>drug there's appetite has come from, which is where there

0:12:49.360 --> 0:12:52.240
<v Speaker 9>alzhemazrugs have come from, are delivering something.

0:12:53.200 --> 0:12:56.680
<v Speaker 6>Any chatter of other companies that Eli Lilly might be

0:12:56.840 --> 0:13:00.720
<v Speaker 6>potentially in the sort of looking here to see potential

0:13:00.840 --> 0:13:04.840
<v Speaker 6>buying as far as wor could potentially obviously continue this

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:06.960
<v Speaker 6>behemoth of a company that we've been seeing.

0:13:08.040 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, so I think the best way to figure that

0:13:09.840 --> 0:13:13.160
<v Speaker 9>out is to look at the products that are facing

0:13:13.200 --> 0:13:17.320
<v Speaker 9>competition in the longer term and look at what else

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:19.840
<v Speaker 9>is available in the biotech sector. So you know, a

0:13:19.840 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 9>lot of these deals are not coming into the mid

0:13:22.559 --> 0:13:26.800
<v Speaker 9>stage development companies. There was a time where everybody wanted big,

0:13:26.840 --> 0:13:29.480
<v Speaker 9>big revenue generators to basically do a little bit of

0:13:29.480 --> 0:13:32.400
<v Speaker 9>financial engineering on that. But what we're seeing more than

0:13:32.480 --> 0:13:36.600
<v Speaker 9>names I read off to Chinuk Prometheus, this company dies.

0:13:36.960 --> 0:13:41.560
<v Speaker 9>These are more midstage pipeline fillers, which are therefore going

0:13:41.640 --> 0:13:45.000
<v Speaker 9>to be tied to what the company is either developing

0:13:45.040 --> 0:13:48.400
<v Speaker 9>a new therapeutic franchise or it's got a drug like

0:13:48.480 --> 0:13:50.680
<v Speaker 9>Tolts in the case of Lily that's going off pattern.

0:13:51.000 --> 0:13:51.959
<v Speaker 4>What you should really.

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:54.680
<v Speaker 9>Be looking for is to marry that with good data

0:13:54.720 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 9>that comes out of the companies as they report them.

0:13:58.400 --> 0:14:00.359
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Sam, thanks so much for joining us. Really preciated

0:14:00.480 --> 0:14:03.600
<v Speaker 1>as always, Sam Fazzelli. He's head of European Research. He's

0:14:03.640 --> 0:14:06.800
<v Speaker 1>also the senior pharmaceuticals analyst, one of the top analysts

0:14:06.800 --> 0:14:07.880
<v Speaker 1>in the city of London.

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:11.319
<v Speaker 7>You're listening to the tape Cats are live program Bloomberg

0:14:11.400 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 7>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:14:15.040 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 7>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com.

0:14:16.840 --> 0:14:18.280
<v Speaker 8>And the Bloomberg Business App.

0:14:18.280 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 7>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:14:21.120 --> 0:14:26.160
<v Speaker 7>flagship New York station, Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 6>Jess Mitt and Paul Sweeney here in the Interactive Brokers studio,

0:14:30.240 --> 0:14:31.880
<v Speaker 6>and we're going to change things up with a C

0:14:32.120 --> 0:14:35.280
<v Speaker 6>suite conversation with someone who I here actually went to

0:14:35.320 --> 0:14:39.160
<v Speaker 6>a school in Texas. Yes, well, so I'm excited. Matt Road,

0:14:39.240 --> 0:14:42.240
<v Speaker 6>chief revenue officer at the auto lending enable to firm

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:44.800
<v Speaker 6>Open Lending. He's going to chat with us about the

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:48.320
<v Speaker 6>auto market, carloans, credit crunch, all things about that. Matt,

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:49.800
<v Speaker 6>thanks so much for joining us.

0:14:50.600 --> 0:14:52.360
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, thank you, guys, Thanks palm Jess.

0:14:52.440 --> 0:14:54.320
<v Speaker 6>I have to get your thoughts when it comes to

0:14:54.440 --> 0:14:56.960
<v Speaker 6>the auto space and with the backdrop obviously with the

0:14:56.960 --> 0:14:59.640
<v Speaker 6>Federal reserve in the direction of the economy. Are you

0:14:59.720 --> 0:15:02.040
<v Speaker 6>noticed seeing any sort of red flags pop up so

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:05.560
<v Speaker 6>far when it comes to auto lending, you.

0:15:05.520 --> 0:15:07.080
<v Speaker 2>Know, not at this time.

0:15:07.080 --> 0:15:09.920
<v Speaker 10>I mean, I think everybody is curious in watching. You know,

0:15:09.960 --> 0:15:13.080
<v Speaker 10>we've seen used car values over the last couple of years,

0:15:13.440 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 10>you know, induced by the pandemic and the shortage of

0:15:15.920 --> 0:15:18.920
<v Speaker 10>supply of vehicles, drive car values to the highest we've

0:15:18.920 --> 0:15:20.920
<v Speaker 10>ever seen. And we've seen the biggest drop last year

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:23.920
<v Speaker 10>in the Mannheim index on records. I think, you know,

0:15:24.320 --> 0:15:27.160
<v Speaker 10>cautiously watching what you use car values are doing, and

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:30.360
<v Speaker 10>then I'll be ever looming, you know, recession that we

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:33.840
<v Speaker 10>may or may not be in has lenders thinking about

0:15:33.920 --> 0:15:36.920
<v Speaker 10>you know, from a strategy standpoint, you know, how can

0:15:36.960 --> 0:15:41.360
<v Speaker 10>they still drive some growth but not you know, avoid

0:15:41.400 --> 0:15:43.520
<v Speaker 10>some of the risk that may be out there today.

0:15:44.080 --> 0:15:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Matt, we may be in a recession or coming

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:49.560
<v Speaker 1>into recession. People have been talking about it for more

0:15:49.600 --> 0:15:51.080
<v Speaker 1>than a year. What are you seeing in terms of

0:15:51.080 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the credit quality of your portfolio? Are are your borrowers

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:56.040
<v Speaker 1>are there? Are they struggling?

0:15:57.360 --> 0:16:00.360
<v Speaker 10>You know, so we tend to focus more on the

0:16:00.400 --> 0:16:04.280
<v Speaker 10>near prime consumer, and what we have typically seen even

0:16:04.320 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 10>through the Great Recession is that near prime consumers can

0:16:08.080 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 10>weather you know, economic storms better than than prime consumers.

0:16:11.920 --> 0:16:14.520
<v Speaker 10>And so, you know, from a from a risk standpoint,

0:16:14.560 --> 0:16:17.720
<v Speaker 10>we encourage you know, banks and in any auto lender

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 10>to diversify their portfolio because you know, again typically you know,

0:16:22.760 --> 0:16:25.400
<v Speaker 10>what we saw in the in the Great Recession was

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:31.080
<v Speaker 10>that prime consumers defaulted at a much higher anticipated rate

0:16:31.720 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 10>than the near prime consumers. So, you know, we have

0:16:34.360 --> 0:16:37.800
<v Speaker 10>not seen anything out of the norm as of yet

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:41.680
<v Speaker 10>as it relates to higher than expected delinquency at this

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:44.760
<v Speaker 10>point in time, but it's something that we continue to monitor.

0:16:44.840 --> 0:16:45.040
<v Speaker 2>Matt.

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:47.600
<v Speaker 1>Do you guys lend directly to borrowers or do you

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:49.800
<v Speaker 1>provide financing for the dealerships?

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:51.320
<v Speaker 2>How does your business model work.

0:16:52.160 --> 0:16:55.560
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, So so we actually are lending enablement platform solution

0:16:55.720 --> 0:17:01.560
<v Speaker 10>that allows auto lenders to better assess risk at origination.

0:17:01.680 --> 0:17:04.920
<v Speaker 10>So we work directly with the banks, credit unions, any

0:17:04.960 --> 0:17:09.199
<v Speaker 10>auto lender on their near prime auto lending strategy to

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:11.840
<v Speaker 10>help them price and assess risk better at the time

0:17:11.880 --> 0:17:14.080
<v Speaker 10>of origination of that of that auto loan.

0:17:14.680 --> 0:17:18.440
<v Speaker 6>Something that struck me is the car shopping website Edmunds

0:17:18.520 --> 0:17:22.240
<v Speaker 6>was talking about how the thousand dollars auto loan payment

0:17:22.320 --> 0:17:25.560
<v Speaker 6>is actually becoming more common. In about seventeen percent of

0:17:25.560 --> 0:17:27.480
<v Speaker 6>people who bought new cars in the first three months

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:29.480
<v Speaker 6>of the year have an auto loan payment of about

0:17:29.520 --> 0:17:35.600
<v Speaker 6>one thousand dollars or more. How is that possible? You know,

0:17:36.119 --> 0:17:37.200
<v Speaker 6>it's even sustainable.

0:17:38.080 --> 0:17:39.520
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, it's pretty wild.

0:17:39.560 --> 0:17:41.320
<v Speaker 10>I mean I think, you know, obviously a lot of

0:17:41.359 --> 0:17:45.240
<v Speaker 10>that was driven by the shortage of car car vehicles

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:48.639
<v Speaker 10>out there, right, So, I mean, when the pandemic, you know,

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:53.239
<v Speaker 10>caused the auto manufacturers to stop making new cars the

0:17:53.240 --> 0:17:55.840
<v Speaker 10>cars that were available, the price of those just obviously

0:17:55.880 --> 0:17:58.520
<v Speaker 10>went up. So you know, coupled that with you know,

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:03.040
<v Speaker 10>rising indust rates over the last year, it's just exacerbated

0:18:03.119 --> 0:18:06.520
<v Speaker 10>some of the affordability issues that the consumers are having

0:18:06.520 --> 0:18:08.520
<v Speaker 10>out there today. So so from a from a bank

0:18:08.560 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 10>and a credit union standpoint, we advise them to take

0:18:11.359 --> 0:18:15.600
<v Speaker 10>ways to to although payments have gone up, you know,

0:18:15.680 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 10>how can they protect themselves from a risk standpoint of

0:18:18.800 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 10>that of that increased payment. But you know a lot

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:25.280
<v Speaker 10>of times, you know, from a from a near prime consumer,

0:18:26.040 --> 0:18:28.280
<v Speaker 10>you know, payment is everything, and so as long as

0:18:28.280 --> 0:18:34.240
<v Speaker 10>they're assessing the collateral value and that residual value appropriately

0:18:34.359 --> 0:18:36.920
<v Speaker 10>on the front end, it puts the bank and the

0:18:37.240 --> 0:18:39.879
<v Speaker 10>credit union in a better position to withstand some of

0:18:39.880 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 10>this some of these things that we are seeing, you know,

0:18:42.840 --> 0:18:44.960
<v Speaker 10>as it relates to affordability in the economy.

0:18:45.480 --> 0:18:48.040
<v Speaker 1>Hey man, I seem to remember in the news in

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:50.480
<v Speaker 1>the last several weeks a bank or multiple banks just

0:18:50.560 --> 0:18:54.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of pulling back from the auto lending business. What

0:18:54.240 --> 0:18:55.560
<v Speaker 1>do you what are you seeing in the marketplace in

0:18:55.600 --> 0:18:58.440
<v Speaker 1>terms of the number of lenders actually out there providing

0:18:58.440 --> 0:19:00.920
<v Speaker 1>credit to this segment of the economy.

0:19:00.960 --> 0:19:03.480
<v Speaker 10>You know, I think today, you know, I think what

0:19:03.600 --> 0:19:05.840
<v Speaker 10>most banks and credit unions are trying to do from

0:19:05.840 --> 0:19:10.479
<v Speaker 10>an asset liability management perspective is focus on shorter duration

0:19:10.680 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 10>loans obviously, given what's happened with you know, Silicon Valley

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:18.440
<v Speaker 10>banks collapse, you know, they need to focus on lending

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 10>to those consumers that you know have a greater value.

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:27.160
<v Speaker 10>So are they achieving a return that exceeds.

0:19:26.680 --> 0:19:27.600
<v Speaker 2>Their cost of capital?

0:19:27.640 --> 0:19:32.480
<v Speaker 10>Because of what's happened with interest rates, obviously, everybody's cost

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:35.720
<v Speaker 10>of capital has gone up, and so you know, maintaining

0:19:35.760 --> 0:19:39.200
<v Speaker 10>balance sheets is what's the most important things and pricing

0:19:39.200 --> 0:19:43.120
<v Speaker 10>those loans correctly, you know, and that really ties back

0:19:43.160 --> 0:19:45.399
<v Speaker 10>to using correct data and to be able to predict

0:19:45.400 --> 0:19:50.440
<v Speaker 10>loan performance ahead of time and ensuring that they're again

0:19:50.680 --> 0:19:55.520
<v Speaker 10>hitting those yield targets that that that they need to

0:19:55.640 --> 0:19:56.320
<v Speaker 10>hit today.

0:19:56.560 --> 0:19:59.840
<v Speaker 6>Right, What indicator are you watching to see if more

0:20:00.000 --> 0:20:02.800
<v Speaker 6>Americans are falling behind on their car loans?

0:20:03.680 --> 0:20:09.160
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, so we we obviously monitor sixty day delinquencies very closely.

0:20:09.240 --> 0:20:11.200
<v Speaker 10>I mean, that is sort of the standard for any

0:20:11.200 --> 0:20:15.200
<v Speaker 10>auto lender out there today in terms of monitoring risk.

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:17.639
<v Speaker 10>And you know, is that that that's kind of the

0:20:17.720 --> 0:20:21.600
<v Speaker 10>leading indicator for you know, what is my defaults or

0:20:21.800 --> 0:20:25.040
<v Speaker 10>is this barwer's ability actually going to make their next payment?

0:20:26.440 --> 0:20:28.679
<v Speaker 10>And so I think that's that's obviously one that that

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:31.399
<v Speaker 10>most of the industry watches just as a sort of

0:20:31.440 --> 0:20:34.120
<v Speaker 10>the leading indicator for future losses.

0:20:34.800 --> 0:20:37.560
<v Speaker 1>And Matt just about thirty seconds here. Just overall, I mean,

0:20:37.920 --> 0:20:41.800
<v Speaker 1>it looks like Detroit settled on this annual manufacturing figure

0:20:41.800 --> 0:20:44.679
<v Speaker 1>of maybe fifteen million vehicles per year versus maybe the

0:20:44.720 --> 0:20:46.520
<v Speaker 1>seventeen or seventeen million plus before.

0:20:47.119 --> 0:20:48.240
<v Speaker 2>Do you think that's a new normal.

0:20:50.640 --> 0:20:53.640
<v Speaker 10>I think that it's it's it's getting back to where

0:20:53.640 --> 0:20:56.560
<v Speaker 10>we I do think the seventeen million years is where

0:20:56.600 --> 0:20:58.399
<v Speaker 10>we're going to get back to. I mean, you know,

0:20:58.720 --> 0:21:02.880
<v Speaker 10>the auto manufacturer, you know, need to make cars, and

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:04.639
<v Speaker 10>so they're.

0:21:04.280 --> 0:21:04.800
<v Speaker 8>Going to do that.

0:21:04.920 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 10>And I think what we're seeing on the incentive side

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:11.119
<v Speaker 10>is that those incentives are coming back, and so that

0:21:11.200 --> 0:21:14.760
<v Speaker 10>will drive new car prices down. As we've started to

0:21:14.800 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 10>see that. I think we just saw the first time

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:19.320
<v Speaker 10>in a couple of years that the average car sale

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:22.119
<v Speaker 10>for a new vehicle was below HIMSRP. So I do

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:23.719
<v Speaker 10>think we're going to get back to normal levels, pre

0:21:23.760 --> 0:21:24.560
<v Speaker 10>pregnement levels.

0:21:24.720 --> 0:21:26.479
<v Speaker 1>All right, Matt, thanks so much for joining us. I

0:21:26.480 --> 0:21:28.680
<v Speaker 1>really appreciate getting some of your thoughts there. Matt Rowe,

0:21:28.880 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 1>he's a chief revenue officer for open lending. Open lending provides,

0:21:33.640 --> 0:21:37.359
<v Speaker 1>you know, lending solutions for auto dealers, so really focusing

0:21:37.400 --> 0:21:38.840
<v Speaker 1>in on that auto business, and that's one of the

0:21:38.840 --> 0:21:41.320
<v Speaker 1>areas that economas said, they really focus on to see

0:21:41.320 --> 0:21:44.560
<v Speaker 1>some cracks in the consumers will continue to pay attention there.

0:21:45.720 --> 0:21:49.119
<v Speaker 7>You're listening to the teenth Ken's are Live program Bloomberg

0:21:49.160 --> 0:21:52.520
<v Speaker 7>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:21:52.640 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 7>the iHeartRadio app, and the Bloomberg Business app, or listen

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:57.960
<v Speaker 7>on demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 6>Of course, what else can we continue to talk about, Paul,

0:22:02.560 --> 0:22:05.159
<v Speaker 6>But obviously the Federal Reserve with Fed Shair Jerome Palll

0:22:05.200 --> 0:22:08.119
<v Speaker 6>going to Capitol Hill on Wednesday and Thursday. So I

0:22:08.160 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 6>want to bring in our next guest, Danielle di Martino Booth,

0:22:11.000 --> 0:22:15.440
<v Speaker 6>who's the CEO and chief strategist at QI Research, joining

0:22:15.520 --> 0:22:17.880
<v Speaker 6>us to of course talk about the FED. Danielle, how

0:22:17.920 --> 0:22:18.199
<v Speaker 6>are you?

0:22:19.200 --> 0:22:20.120
<v Speaker 11>I'm doing great today.

0:22:20.119 --> 0:22:22.800
<v Speaker 6>How are you doing well? So I want to get

0:22:22.800 --> 0:22:25.520
<v Speaker 6>your take now that we got off the FED decision

0:22:25.760 --> 0:22:27.880
<v Speaker 6>last week and obviously going to hear from the man

0:22:27.960 --> 0:22:32.040
<v Speaker 6>himself again this week, what were your expectations as far

0:22:32.040 --> 0:22:35.680
<v Speaker 6>as going into this and also what was your sort

0:22:35.720 --> 0:22:37.919
<v Speaker 6>of take now that we've gotten past the FED decision

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:38.440
<v Speaker 6>last week.

0:22:39.880 --> 0:22:43.600
<v Speaker 11>Well, from the perspective of a former FED insider, to

0:22:43.640 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 11>say that it's exceedingly rare to see the FED truly

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:49.800
<v Speaker 11>pause and then resume rate hikes.

0:22:50.040 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 5>I will believe it.

0:22:50.800 --> 0:22:52.840
<v Speaker 11>When I see it, and I'm happy to be corrected.

0:22:52.880 --> 0:22:54.800
<v Speaker 11>And that's where the market is pricing in right now.

0:22:55.040 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 11>But this is a highly unusual situation. But again, the

0:22:59.320 --> 0:23:01.720
<v Speaker 11>markets are sitting at about seventy four percent probability that

0:23:01.760 --> 0:23:03.800
<v Speaker 11>there's another go come July. But there's a heck of

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:06.919
<v Speaker 11>a lot of data between now and then. You know,

0:23:06.960 --> 0:23:09.399
<v Speaker 11>starting off on the terminal this morning, you see that

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:11.879
<v Speaker 11>private equity firms are having a very hard time hedging,

0:23:11.920 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 11>and at the same time, you know, used car loans

0:23:14.600 --> 0:23:17.600
<v Speaker 11>are upside down. This is a story that we would

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:19.719
<v Speaker 11>have read about in two thousand and eight, but about homes.

0:23:20.000 --> 0:23:21.600
<v Speaker 11>For the average loan to value is one hundred and

0:23:21.680 --> 0:23:24.520
<v Speaker 11>twenty five percent on used cars in the first three

0:23:24.560 --> 0:23:28.000
<v Speaker 11>months of twenty twenty three, according to TransUnion. Clearly, the

0:23:28.080 --> 0:23:33.560
<v Speaker 11>fed's campaign has had an effect in many different places.

0:23:33.560 --> 0:23:35.480
<v Speaker 1>It seems to me, Danielle, I mean you're you're the

0:23:35.520 --> 0:23:38.080
<v Speaker 1>expert to hear, having been at the Dallas FED. But

0:23:38.119 --> 0:23:41.280
<v Speaker 1>it just feels like from a optics perspective, I wouldn't

0:23:41.320 --> 0:23:42.960
<v Speaker 1>want if I were on the FED, I would want

0:23:42.960 --> 0:23:45.960
<v Speaker 1>to pause and then just kind of restart next meeting.

0:23:45.960 --> 0:23:48.480
<v Speaker 1>It sounds like I don't have much conviction one way

0:23:48.560 --> 0:23:48.880
<v Speaker 1>or the other.

0:23:50.280 --> 0:23:53.720
<v Speaker 11>Well, you know, it was interesting because Powell definitely threaded

0:23:53.760 --> 0:23:56.760
<v Speaker 11>that needle in what he said at the podium. He said,

0:23:56.880 --> 0:23:59.119
<v Speaker 11>the data that we have over a six week period

0:23:59.160 --> 0:24:01.680
<v Speaker 11>that's much different the data we have over a three

0:24:01.800 --> 0:24:04.840
<v Speaker 11>month period, which is more trend like. So he was

0:24:04.880 --> 0:24:08.400
<v Speaker 11>actually answering your question in advance, saying that the time

0:24:08.440 --> 0:24:11.160
<v Speaker 11>we get to the July meeting, we will have enough

0:24:11.200 --> 0:24:13.840
<v Speaker 11>to establish whether or not the lag effect has created

0:24:13.880 --> 0:24:16.639
<v Speaker 11>a trend in the data or whether it's a blip,

0:24:16.640 --> 0:24:18.199
<v Speaker 11>and we still have a lot more work to do

0:24:18.280 --> 0:24:22.560
<v Speaker 11>on the inflation front. I was his answers were extremely

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:27.040
<v Speaker 11>choreographed and extremely careful, but he did make that distinction.

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:30.880
<v Speaker 6>Danielle, are you managing money?

0:24:31.359 --> 0:24:35.720
<v Speaker 11>We advise institutional investors, so we I think our most

0:24:36.000 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 11>are what they thought was our craziest call was in

0:24:38.880 --> 0:24:41.320
<v Speaker 11>June of twenty twenty one, we said that the yield

0:24:41.359 --> 0:24:46.080
<v Speaker 11>curve would invert to triple digit negative levels and stay there,

0:24:46.440 --> 0:24:48.919
<v Speaker 11>when the entire street was saying no, no, we're going steeper,

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:51.600
<v Speaker 11>We're going steeper. We're of the mind right now that

0:24:52.119 --> 0:24:56.480
<v Speaker 11>higher for longer is being reflected in the persistence of

0:24:56.520 --> 0:25:00.400
<v Speaker 11>the negative inversion in the two year tenure, which pushing

0:25:00.400 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 11>one hundred basis points again today.

0:25:03.119 --> 0:25:06.479
<v Speaker 6>How are you advising clients to position whether or not

0:25:06.600 --> 0:25:09.080
<v Speaker 6>there's a couple more interest rate hikes or not.

0:25:10.520 --> 0:25:12.639
<v Speaker 11>Well, what we're telling telling clients right now is that

0:25:12.720 --> 0:25:15.520
<v Speaker 11>time is on their side. If you have the optionality

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:19.440
<v Speaker 11>of actually making a return on your cash right now,

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:22.880
<v Speaker 11>then there's absolutely nothing wrong with being having a little

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:25.440
<v Speaker 11>bit of dry powder, having some cash on the sidelines.

0:25:25.640 --> 0:25:28.880
<v Speaker 11>By the same token, we think that given what we're

0:25:28.920 --> 0:25:33.760
<v Speaker 11>hearing about household finances and this aha moment in October

0:25:33.800 --> 0:25:37.640
<v Speaker 11>when student loan payments resume, we think that a lot

0:25:37.680 --> 0:25:42.159
<v Speaker 11>of the consumer discretionary doocs and names and sectors have

0:25:42.320 --> 0:25:45.040
<v Speaker 11>gone way way over their skis right now on the

0:25:45.040 --> 0:25:47.400
<v Speaker 11>assumption that everything's going to be fine and the FED

0:25:47.480 --> 0:25:51.160
<v Speaker 11>is going to rise right into the rescue with rate cuts.

0:25:51.320 --> 0:25:54.160
<v Speaker 11>We don't see that as happening. But yet we are

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:59.240
<v Speaker 11>seeing some severe distress emanating from the US household sector.

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:04.200
<v Speaker 1>So again, I love to get further thoughts there, I mean, Danielle,

0:26:04.200 --> 0:26:07.439
<v Speaker 1>because I'm not sure really how to handle or phrase

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:09.120
<v Speaker 1>or characterize this economy.

0:26:09.400 --> 0:26:10.600
<v Speaker 2>How tough is it out there?

0:26:11.080 --> 0:26:13.199
<v Speaker 1>I find myself stuck here in New York and if

0:26:13.240 --> 0:26:15.119
<v Speaker 1>I go to work to San Francisco, But how is

0:26:15.119 --> 0:26:15.560
<v Speaker 1>it out there?

0:26:15.600 --> 0:26:16.679
<v Speaker 2>What's the data telling you?

0:26:18.240 --> 0:26:21.160
<v Speaker 11>Well, the data you know. Actually, this week's quill, I'm

0:26:21.200 --> 0:26:24.879
<v Speaker 11>writing on big ANNEC data because it's more of the

0:26:25.040 --> 0:26:27.879
<v Speaker 11>anecdotes that you're hearing that tell the bigger story. We

0:26:27.960 --> 0:26:32.639
<v Speaker 11>have to recall it's advertised on every medium known in

0:26:32.680 --> 0:26:36.280
<v Speaker 11>financial media. The employee retention credit is pumping about twenty

0:26:36.359 --> 0:26:39.640
<v Speaker 11>billion dollars a month into the US economy. That makes

0:26:39.640 --> 0:26:42.560
<v Speaker 11>it really hard to tease out spending trends when the

0:26:42.640 --> 0:26:45.480
<v Speaker 11>highest income earners are getting twenty billion dollars a month

0:26:45.480 --> 0:26:49.440
<v Speaker 11>from Uncle Sam in leftover Carezact spending through the IRS.

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:53.840
<v Speaker 11>So that's a really big swing factor about two hundred

0:26:53.840 --> 0:26:57.480
<v Speaker 11>billion dollars in the last three years or so. Marginal

0:26:57.640 --> 0:27:01.679
<v Speaker 11>increase to high net worth individuals if you will you

0:27:01.800 --> 0:27:05.439
<v Speaker 11>parse that out. There was a documentary that aired a

0:27:05.440 --> 0:27:09.040
<v Speaker 11>few months ago about a Phoenix food bank, for example,

0:27:09.880 --> 0:27:13.200
<v Speaker 11>the local TV station just revisited that same food bank,

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:16.080
<v Speaker 11>and prior volunteers at that food bank are now going

0:27:16.119 --> 0:27:19.920
<v Speaker 11>to the feed bank for food. So we're seeing a turn.

0:27:20.000 --> 0:27:24.040
<v Speaker 11>There's a huge bifurcation in the US economy right now

0:27:24.160 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 11>where the haves really have it and the haves not

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:30.240
<v Speaker 11>are really struggling. But it's hard to pick up in

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:31.639
<v Speaker 11>the data right.

0:27:31.520 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 6>In the bifurcation. Just looking at some of the housing

0:27:33.680 --> 0:27:36.160
<v Speaker 6>data this morning, with housing starts surging the most since

0:27:36.280 --> 0:27:40.880
<v Speaker 6>twenty sixteen, and so that's suggesting that residential construction could

0:27:40.880 --> 0:27:43.639
<v Speaker 6>be on track to really help fuel economic growth. But

0:27:43.680 --> 0:27:45.760
<v Speaker 6>to your point, how do you square some of that

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:48.119
<v Speaker 6>data away where you start to see some cracks with

0:27:48.200 --> 0:27:50.439
<v Speaker 6>the consumer even though we've seen other consumer data like

0:27:50.480 --> 0:27:52.040
<v Speaker 6>retail sales still keep up.

0:27:53.240 --> 0:27:55.280
<v Speaker 11>Well, we are seeing retail sales keep up, and we

0:27:55.359 --> 0:27:58.919
<v Speaker 11>should given we're seeing month after month of record uptake

0:27:58.960 --> 0:28:01.200
<v Speaker 11>on credit cards as well as the extra twenty billion

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:03.080
<v Speaker 11>dollars that I just said is being pumped into the

0:28:03.119 --> 0:28:07.359
<v Speaker 11>economy via the ERC tax credit. So we should be

0:28:07.400 --> 0:28:10.720
<v Speaker 11>seeing these numbers given the amount of money that's being

0:28:10.760 --> 0:28:13.679
<v Speaker 11>taken out and or given away by Uncle Sam. But

0:28:13.800 --> 0:28:17.120
<v Speaker 11>when you see housing starts a hat tip to Randy

0:28:17.160 --> 0:28:19.400
<v Speaker 11>Woodword for pointing this out to me, when you see

0:28:19.520 --> 0:28:24.280
<v Speaker 11>starts at the highest level compared to permits since the

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:28.320
<v Speaker 11>nineteen nineties, there's something funky in the data, especially when

0:28:28.359 --> 0:28:30.919
<v Speaker 11>we learned that thirty one point two billion dollars of

0:28:31.000 --> 0:28:35.400
<v Speaker 11>residential loans saw a negative in the Fed's H eight

0:28:35.480 --> 0:28:37.640
<v Speaker 11>on Friday after the clothes when everybody had long since

0:28:37.720 --> 0:28:41.640
<v Speaker 11>left for the long weekend. So, from what I'm hearing

0:28:41.680 --> 0:28:45.280
<v Speaker 11>from home builders and from people who study the industry,

0:28:45.800 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 11>right now, builders are buying down points, so you're still

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:52.080
<v Speaker 11>borrowing in the four percent range if you're buying a

0:28:52.080 --> 0:28:54.760
<v Speaker 11>new home. The assumption is that the FED is going

0:28:54.800 --> 0:28:57.800
<v Speaker 11>to lower interest rates, making it that much easier to

0:28:57.960 --> 0:29:01.720
<v Speaker 11>push this spec supply out in into the housing market

0:29:01.760 --> 0:29:03.720
<v Speaker 11>and for there to be people who can actually afford it.

0:29:03.800 --> 0:29:06.640
<v Speaker 11>But again, a lot of people, whether you're talking about

0:29:07.040 --> 0:29:10.760
<v Speaker 11>home builders or you're talking about individuals making loans, loan

0:29:10.840 --> 0:29:13.680
<v Speaker 11>officers at banks, a lot of the decisions are being

0:29:13.680 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 11>predicated on the assumption of said rate cuts. Going forward.

0:29:17.560 --> 0:29:20.960
<v Speaker 1>So on that front, there rate cuts, I mean keeps

0:29:20.960 --> 0:29:23.840
<v Speaker 1>getting pushed out, pushed out. What is your call given

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:24.640
<v Speaker 1>the data right now?

0:29:25.880 --> 0:29:29.680
<v Speaker 11>Well, I don't If any of you are Star Wars fans,

0:29:29.720 --> 0:29:32.840
<v Speaker 11>you know these aren't the droids you're looking for. When

0:29:33.120 --> 0:29:36.680
<v Speaker 11>Powell was asked by Politico dot com about quantitative tightening,

0:29:37.120 --> 0:29:39.880
<v Speaker 11>he basically gave her that answer, These are not the

0:29:39.920 --> 0:29:42.400
<v Speaker 11>droids you're looking for. We're not talking about the balance sheet.

0:29:42.640 --> 0:29:45.200
<v Speaker 11>It's going to continue to run off in the background. Now,

0:29:45.240 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 11>he can only do that if he maintains high interest rates.

0:29:48.480 --> 0:29:51.200
<v Speaker 11>You cannot cut interest rates and have quantitative tightening going

0:29:51.200 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 11>on at the same time. They're by definition contradictory policies.

0:29:55.000 --> 0:29:57.200
<v Speaker 11>So for him to keep shrinking that balance sheet, all

0:29:57.200 --> 0:29:59.600
<v Speaker 11>I ask to do is not hike anymore. Just keep

0:29:59.640 --> 0:30:00.600
<v Speaker 11>breaks where they are.

0:30:03.200 --> 0:30:07.280
<v Speaker 6>All right, Well, it was really great having you, Danielle,

0:30:07.320 --> 0:30:09.880
<v Speaker 6>as far as just breaking down the Federal Reserve, all

0:30:09.920 --> 0:30:14.000
<v Speaker 6>things FED ahead of Fedchair Jerome Pal's testimony on Capitol

0:30:14.040 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 6>Hill on Wednesday and Thursday. Thank you so much for joining.

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:19.200
<v Speaker 11>Us, Thank you for having me today.

0:30:19.480 --> 0:30:22.600
<v Speaker 7>You're listening to the tape Cans Are Live program Bloomberg

0:30:22.680 --> 0:30:26.240
<v Speaker 7>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:30:26.320 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 7>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com.

0:30:28.120 --> 0:30:29.560
<v Speaker 8>And the Bloomberg Business App.

0:30:29.560 --> 0:30:32.400
<v Speaker 7>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:30:32.400 --> 0:30:37.440
<v Speaker 7>flagship New York station. Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:30:38.440 --> 0:30:41.960
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's pivot over to lay great boondoggle over

0:30:42.040 --> 0:30:45.440
<v Speaker 1>in Paris. That would be the Paris Air Show. They

0:30:45.480 --> 0:30:48.320
<v Speaker 1>buy and sell airplanes there, like you know, we change socks.

0:30:48.320 --> 0:30:51.240
<v Speaker 1>George Ferguson's over there. He's a senior aerospace and defense analyst,

0:30:51.680 --> 0:30:53.840
<v Speaker 1>and it's so important that George is there, so we

0:30:53.880 --> 0:30:56.400
<v Speaker 1>send him there every other year there than the odd

0:30:56.440 --> 0:30:57.400
<v Speaker 1>year they go to London.

0:30:57.760 --> 0:31:01.840
<v Speaker 2>George, thanks much for joining us Boeing Airbus.

0:31:02.360 --> 0:31:05.840
<v Speaker 1>How's it playing out for those two big aerospace companies?

0:31:06.920 --> 0:31:10.160
<v Speaker 12>Thanks for having me? It's I'd say it's I'd say

0:31:10.160 --> 0:31:14.000
<v Speaker 12>it's playing out kind of weekly this year, weekly as

0:31:14.040 --> 0:31:17.320
<v Speaker 12>in W E A K L. I think there's no

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:21.240
<v Speaker 12>E in there. Why, you know, we've seen a lot

0:31:21.280 --> 0:31:23.880
<v Speaker 12>of the orders we've seen are really wheels out of

0:31:23.960 --> 0:31:27.920
<v Speaker 12>previous orders that were undisclosed, and so they disclose them

0:31:27.960 --> 0:31:29.840
<v Speaker 12>at the air show, and you know, they try to

0:31:29.840 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 12>get someone to put them in the tally. Airbus started

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:37.120
<v Speaker 12>the show out with a five hundred airplane order from Indigo,

0:31:37.520 --> 0:31:40.960
<v Speaker 12>the largest order ever, which was that was pretty exciting.

0:31:41.720 --> 0:31:43.440
<v Speaker 12>I mean when you when you look at the order

0:31:43.440 --> 0:31:47.760
<v Speaker 12>books right now, Indigo, you know, the largest air in India,

0:31:48.000 --> 0:31:51.840
<v Speaker 12>fast grower. Indigo has four hundred airplanes on order already,

0:31:51.840 --> 0:31:53.920
<v Speaker 12>so I guess they'll add the five hundred to four hundred.

0:31:54.400 --> 0:31:57.560
<v Speaker 12>Have about nine hundred airplanes on order. They said they're

0:31:57.600 --> 0:31:59.720
<v Speaker 12>taking care of in the order book well into the

0:31:59.720 --> 0:32:02.680
<v Speaker 12>next decade. It didn't surprise us. They took about fifty

0:32:02.720 --> 0:32:05.920
<v Speaker 12>airplanes last year, so I think they were looking to

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:08.800
<v Speaker 12>make a big splash. But you know, if you knock

0:32:08.840 --> 0:32:10.800
<v Speaker 12>that order out, there's just not a lot going on

0:32:10.960 --> 0:32:13.160
<v Speaker 12>the show. But don't tell my bosses, because I want.

0:32:14.800 --> 0:32:17.720
<v Speaker 6>What are these orders tell us about the trajectory of

0:32:17.800 --> 0:32:20.440
<v Speaker 6>the global economy?

0:32:20.560 --> 0:32:23.960
<v Speaker 12>You know, I think what they tell us is, look,

0:32:24.000 --> 0:32:27.360
<v Speaker 12>aerospace is one of the last recovering areas of the

0:32:27.400 --> 0:32:30.240
<v Speaker 12>global economy. And everyone we talked to over here we

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:33.239
<v Speaker 12>asked the same question, how's your supply chain, How's your

0:32:33.240 --> 0:32:36.760
<v Speaker 12>supply chain? How's your supply chain? And we're hearing stories

0:32:36.800 --> 0:32:41.120
<v Speaker 12>from it's not getting any worse, but it isn't. We

0:32:41.200 --> 0:32:43.640
<v Speaker 12>still have a lot of problems. So we're getting you know,

0:32:43.720 --> 0:32:47.800
<v Speaker 12>incremental improvement. This industry isn't performing at the level it

0:32:47.840 --> 0:32:51.240
<v Speaker 12>was performing before the pandemic. It's going to take them

0:32:51.320 --> 0:32:54.240
<v Speaker 12>a bunch more years to get there. And so what

0:32:54.240 --> 0:32:57.400
<v Speaker 12>that means is that backlogs are already large. They're already

0:32:57.760 --> 0:33:01.720
<v Speaker 12>stretching into the next decade actually for the Neo and

0:33:01.760 --> 0:33:05.560
<v Speaker 12>the Max, right, the two narrow body people movers, and

0:33:05.640 --> 0:33:07.640
<v Speaker 12>so I think you didn't wait for the show. If

0:33:07.680 --> 0:33:09.160
<v Speaker 12>you had in order to place, you got it placed

0:33:09.240 --> 0:33:11.200
<v Speaker 12>right away because you had to get in that backlog

0:33:11.560 --> 0:33:14.920
<v Speaker 12>and hope that these two manufacturers figure out how to

0:33:14.960 --> 0:33:18.040
<v Speaker 12>get more airplanes pumped through their factories. But they're still

0:33:18.320 --> 0:33:20.720
<v Speaker 12>so I haven't supply chain problems. Labor is the big issue.

0:33:20.840 --> 0:33:22.840
<v Speaker 2>So all right, I want to get to like, what

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:23.680
<v Speaker 2>is the problem.

0:33:23.720 --> 0:33:28.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not hearing about semiconductor problems anywhere these days. You know,

0:33:28.120 --> 0:33:29.840
<v Speaker 1>it feels I haven't heard from the auto guys in

0:33:30.040 --> 0:33:33.640
<v Speaker 1>a while, So what really for aerospace. I understand it's

0:33:33.680 --> 0:33:36.040
<v Speaker 1>long lead time and it's you know, building the planes

0:33:36.320 --> 0:33:39.080
<v Speaker 1>a pretty big deal, but what are the supply chains

0:33:39.080 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 1>and kind of is there any fix out there?

0:33:42.840 --> 0:33:45.760
<v Speaker 12>You know, it's really hard, I think for aerospace because,

0:33:46.080 --> 0:33:49.000
<v Speaker 12>like I said, the big problem is labor, labor, labor,

0:33:49.640 --> 0:33:53.760
<v Speaker 12>and it's not just hiring labor, right, this is sophisticated manufacturing.

0:33:53.760 --> 0:33:56.160
<v Speaker 12>You have to hire it, train it, and get it

0:33:56.240 --> 0:34:00.680
<v Speaker 12>to perform at the level of performed pre pandemic. All

0:34:00.720 --> 0:34:04.760
<v Speaker 12>of this in the backdrop of a global economy where

0:34:05.440 --> 0:34:08.759
<v Speaker 12>during the pandemic people learn to work from home, liked it,

0:34:09.080 --> 0:34:12.080
<v Speaker 12>want the quality of life. And so now you say

0:34:12.080 --> 0:34:13.400
<v Speaker 12>to yourself, do I want to go back to my

0:34:13.440 --> 0:34:16.280
<v Speaker 12>aerospace job. I got to go there five days a week.

0:34:16.680 --> 0:34:19.239
<v Speaker 12>My neighbor's going in three days a week, and you're

0:34:19.280 --> 0:34:21.400
<v Speaker 12>sleeping in at six o'clock in the morning. I'm not

0:34:21.480 --> 0:34:23.080
<v Speaker 12>taking that job. I'm going to go with attack or

0:34:23.120 --> 0:34:23.719
<v Speaker 12>something like that.

0:34:23.960 --> 0:34:24.280
<v Speaker 4>Wow.

0:34:24.680 --> 0:34:27.680
<v Speaker 6>So, especially when it comes to pilot pay, that has

0:34:27.719 --> 0:34:29.439
<v Speaker 6>been a particular issue.

0:34:29.160 --> 0:34:31.000
<v Speaker 8>Right, Yes.

0:34:31.360 --> 0:34:34.160
<v Speaker 12>Absolutely. The funny thing too is the pilots even in

0:34:34.200 --> 0:34:37.400
<v Speaker 12>their agreement, they wanted quality of life issues. And I

0:34:37.440 --> 0:34:40.680
<v Speaker 12>was like, wow, you got to get my cockpit five plane.

0:34:40.960 --> 0:34:45.200
<v Speaker 12>But us pilots especially, I think I have a really

0:34:45.200 --> 0:34:47.440
<v Speaker 12>good year, right, Delta has already signed an agreement with

0:34:47.480 --> 0:34:51.640
<v Speaker 12>their pilots eighteen percent immediately retroactive to the beginning of

0:34:51.640 --> 0:34:55.200
<v Speaker 12>the year, five more percent in pay at the end

0:34:55.239 --> 0:34:57.320
<v Speaker 12>of the year, and then I think it's another five,

0:34:57.560 --> 0:35:01.040
<v Speaker 12>four and four in the out years. So if you

0:35:01.080 --> 0:35:03.319
<v Speaker 12>want the school to be a pilot, you know, your

0:35:03.320 --> 0:35:04.040
<v Speaker 12>ship has come in.

0:35:04.280 --> 0:35:07.440
<v Speaker 1>Your ship has come in so Georgia over there in Paris.

0:35:07.520 --> 0:35:09.360
<v Speaker 1>I know it's always a fight, and you know, between

0:35:09.400 --> 0:35:12.759
<v Speaker 1>Boeing and Airbus, but I want to talk about kind

0:35:12.800 --> 0:35:15.799
<v Speaker 1>of talk about the big jets that I like, the

0:35:15.800 --> 0:35:18.120
<v Speaker 1>big wide body jets, you know, the old seven four

0:35:18.200 --> 0:35:21.000
<v Speaker 1>sevens or even the you know, the triple sevens and

0:35:21.000 --> 0:35:21.800
<v Speaker 1>all that kind of stuff.

0:35:21.840 --> 0:35:24.839
<v Speaker 2>That the Airbus three, I don't know, was it three eighty?

0:35:24.880 --> 0:35:25.480
<v Speaker 2>This monsters.

0:35:25.840 --> 0:35:27.640
<v Speaker 1>Are they even gonna be making those things anymore?

0:35:27.680 --> 0:35:28.120
<v Speaker 2>Is at all?

0:35:28.200 --> 0:35:31.799
<v Speaker 1>Like you said, the people movers the smaller planes, you know.

0:35:32.000 --> 0:35:34.480
<v Speaker 12>So what we saw during the pandemic is that the

0:35:34.520 --> 0:35:37.560
<v Speaker 12>big four engine airplanes three eighty and the seven four

0:35:37.640 --> 0:35:42.120
<v Speaker 12>seven they were sunset. So they're done with the seven four.

0:35:42.719 --> 0:35:44.440
<v Speaker 12>I think we're fully done with the three eighty, though

0:35:44.440 --> 0:35:46.360
<v Speaker 12>there might be one or two coming off the line. Still,

0:35:46.360 --> 0:35:50.840
<v Speaker 12>but they're done. The two big the wide bodies that

0:35:50.880 --> 0:35:52.440
<v Speaker 12>are going to rule the day, I think, you know,

0:35:52.520 --> 0:35:55.120
<v Speaker 12>post pandemic, are going to be the seven eight seven

0:35:55.520 --> 0:35:57.640
<v Speaker 12>and the A three fifty, and we've seen orders for

0:35:57.680 --> 0:36:01.160
<v Speaker 12>those airplanes here at the show. Long haul travel has

0:36:01.200 --> 0:36:04.120
<v Speaker 12>taken a little bit longer to come back. China is

0:36:04.160 --> 0:36:07.280
<v Speaker 12>still not sort of wide open. There's not much capacity

0:36:07.320 --> 0:36:10.160
<v Speaker 12>going in and out of there from Europe in the US,

0:36:10.960 --> 0:36:13.880
<v Speaker 12>you know, long haul capacity, so that's kind of slowed

0:36:13.920 --> 0:36:17.400
<v Speaker 12>down that recovery. I still think there's some willing to

0:36:17.440 --> 0:36:19.920
<v Speaker 12>dealing dealing to do here at the show on wide bodies,

0:36:19.920 --> 0:36:22.759
<v Speaker 12>because that's one of the areas of the backlogs, the

0:36:23.160 --> 0:36:24.840
<v Speaker 12>you know, the three fifteen to seventy eighty seven that

0:36:24.920 --> 0:36:27.640
<v Speaker 12>Bolli and everybody would like to grow. They want to build.

0:36:28.120 --> 0:36:29.920
<v Speaker 12>They want to build more rate on that they could make.

0:36:30.000 --> 0:36:32.680
<v Speaker 12>They could be more profitable toy build more per month,

0:36:32.719 --> 0:36:34.319
<v Speaker 12>and so I think there's probably some wheeling and dealing

0:36:34.400 --> 0:36:37.279
<v Speaker 12>to be done, maybe last minute dinners tonight, you know,

0:36:37.360 --> 0:36:39.600
<v Speaker 12>to try to coerce people to buy one hundred and

0:36:39.640 --> 0:36:40.760
<v Speaker 12>thirty million dollar jets.

0:36:40.920 --> 0:36:41.920
<v Speaker 2>You know, all right, you.

0:36:41.880 --> 0:36:45.239
<v Speaker 1>Flew over to Paris, I'm guessing you went business. How

0:36:45.440 --> 0:36:48.440
<v Speaker 1>was it in terms of was this sold out? Tell

0:36:48.440 --> 0:36:49.759
<v Speaker 1>it to us about the flight and kind of what

0:36:49.800 --> 0:36:50.240
<v Speaker 1>you learned.

0:36:51.280 --> 0:36:55.719
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, I mean flight was pretty full. Is United flight

0:36:55.800 --> 0:36:58.839
<v Speaker 12>on a triple seven a big steal that you'd like? Yeah,

0:36:58.880 --> 0:37:03.160
<v Speaker 12>and those will continue to remain in you know, in production.

0:37:03.200 --> 0:37:05.200
<v Speaker 12>I think they're Heyday. That day we'll come back and

0:37:05.239 --> 0:37:07.280
<v Speaker 12>have a Hey Day again because that'll be the biggest

0:37:07.280 --> 0:37:11.080
<v Speaker 12>people movers. But the flight was full, you know, I

0:37:11.080 --> 0:37:14.960
<v Speaker 12>think this year is going to be pretty busy when

0:37:14.960 --> 0:37:18.280
<v Speaker 12>it comes to this summer. When it comes to European travel,

0:37:18.600 --> 0:37:20.440
<v Speaker 12>there's a lot of bounce back. You know, here in

0:37:20.480 --> 0:37:22.640
<v Speaker 12>Paris we have you can see a lot of Americans

0:37:22.640 --> 0:37:25.400
<v Speaker 12>on the streets, not a lot of Asians, you know,

0:37:25.440 --> 0:37:28.400
<v Speaker 12>not a lot of Chinese and Koreans and Japanese from

0:37:28.400 --> 0:37:30.640
<v Speaker 12>other times I've been here, a lot a lot more

0:37:30.640 --> 0:37:34.000
<v Speaker 12>Americans a dollars strong. So they're filling airplanes and they're all,

0:37:34.080 --> 0:37:35.880
<v Speaker 12>you know, they're trying to get that revenge travel. And

0:37:35.920 --> 0:37:38.239
<v Speaker 12>they got to go back to Paris two or three

0:37:38.320 --> 0:37:40.200
<v Speaker 12>more times since they had to go through a pandemic,

0:37:40.280 --> 0:37:43.000
<v Speaker 12>and so they're you know, they're full they're in the airplanes.

0:37:43.320 --> 0:37:45.480
<v Speaker 6>George, we only have thirty seconds left. When do you

0:37:45.600 --> 0:37:49.640
<v Speaker 6>think corporate travel will return to its pre pandemic levels.

0:37:50.440 --> 0:37:53.000
<v Speaker 12>Yeah, so our last look it was seventy percent back.

0:37:53.360 --> 0:37:55.319
<v Speaker 12>I think we got to get back to a world

0:37:55.360 --> 0:37:57.080
<v Speaker 12>where people are going to the office five days a

0:37:57.120 --> 0:38:01.560
<v Speaker 12>week and it's maybe not so much quality of life exactly.

0:38:01.880 --> 0:38:04.840
<v Speaker 1>That's coming from a former Army officer, you know, quabi

0:38:04.880 --> 0:38:07.600
<v Speaker 1>of life, Get back to work. George Ferguson, thank you

0:38:07.680 --> 0:38:10.200
<v Speaker 1>so much. We appreciate it as always. George Ferguson. He

0:38:10.239 --> 0:38:13.560
<v Speaker 1>covers the global airspace industry, the airline business, and as

0:38:13.600 --> 0:38:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I mentioned, he is a veteran of the US Army,

0:38:16.080 --> 0:38:18.720
<v Speaker 1>so we of course thank him for his service. But again,

0:38:19.000 --> 0:38:21.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, when I was working with George, I'd see

0:38:21.200 --> 0:38:22.840
<v Speaker 1>this request come in. Oh, I got to go to

0:38:22.880 --> 0:38:24.640
<v Speaker 1>Paris for the Paris Air Show next year. I need

0:38:24.680 --> 0:38:26.160
<v Speaker 1>to get in London for the farms where I'm like,

0:38:26.440 --> 0:38:28.240
<v Speaker 1>really you got to go, say yeah, this is where.

0:38:28.040 --> 0:38:29.920
<v Speaker 6>It all happens, you know, and then Hearriet.

0:38:29.680 --> 0:38:32.520
<v Speaker 1>There is yeah, I mean, and they just it's amazing

0:38:32.880 --> 0:38:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the you know the amount of money that gets committed.

0:38:35.239 --> 0:38:36.360
<v Speaker 2>At those air shows.

0:38:36.400 --> 0:38:39.560
<v Speaker 1>Just huge orders from airlines, and he was mentioning Indigo

0:38:40.160 --> 0:38:42.840
<v Speaker 1>talking about a fast growth market of India.

0:38:42.880 --> 0:38:44.120
<v Speaker 2>So that's interesting to learn.

0:38:44.400 --> 0:38:47.480
<v Speaker 7>You're listening to the tape cans are live program Bloomberg

0:38:47.600 --> 0:38:51.200
<v Speaker 7>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:38:51.239 --> 0:38:53.200
<v Speaker 7>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and.

0:38:53.160 --> 0:38:54.479
<v Speaker 8>The Bloomberg Business App.

0:38:54.520 --> 0:38:57.319
<v Speaker 7>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:38:57.360 --> 0:39:01.360
<v Speaker 7>flagship New York station, Just Say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven.

0:39:04.120 --> 0:39:06.880
<v Speaker 6>Jess Mitten and Paul Sweeney here in the Interactive Broker

0:39:06.960 --> 0:39:09.040
<v Speaker 6>studio and Paul and I we were just talking about

0:39:09.040 --> 0:39:13.160
<v Speaker 6>that Kava ipo last week that debuted. It actually ended

0:39:13.239 --> 0:39:15.480
<v Speaker 6>up being the sixth largest IPO of the year after

0:39:15.520 --> 0:39:18.120
<v Speaker 6>it raised three hundred and seventeen million dollars at around

0:39:18.120 --> 0:39:21.160
<v Speaker 6>a two hundred actually a two point five billion dollar valuation.

0:39:21.239 --> 0:39:23.400
<v Speaker 6>But once you saw that open up, Paul obviously closer

0:39:23.400 --> 0:39:27.920
<v Speaker 6>to a five billion dollar valuation and being up to

0:39:28.000 --> 0:39:31.160
<v Speaker 6>about forty two dollars per share notes trading around thirty eight.

0:39:31.200 --> 0:39:34.440
<v Speaker 6>But who better to bring in to chat about this

0:39:34.520 --> 0:39:36.799
<v Speaker 6>ipo as well as what the outlook is when it

0:39:36.840 --> 0:39:40.200
<v Speaker 6>comes to the IPO market. Brian Lynch, who's the head

0:39:40.239 --> 0:39:43.400
<v Speaker 6>of market insight at Equiti z in Brian talk to

0:39:43.480 --> 0:39:46.600
<v Speaker 6>us about this IPO last week and what you think

0:39:46.600 --> 0:39:49.319
<v Speaker 6>this means as far as what the trajectory is for

0:39:49.360 --> 0:39:51.520
<v Speaker 6>the IPO market moving forward this year next year.

0:39:52.560 --> 0:39:56.000
<v Speaker 13>Thanks for having me. I think the IPO market was

0:39:56.080 --> 0:39:59.400
<v Speaker 13>really seeing the benefits of the Mediterranean diet. As you've

0:39:59.440 --> 0:40:02.480
<v Speaker 13>said that. Kava ipo traded up ninety two percent on

0:40:02.520 --> 0:40:05.400
<v Speaker 13>its first day and holding on to that IPO pop

0:40:05.520 --> 0:40:09.200
<v Speaker 13>and I think they've set a really strong example for

0:40:09.400 --> 0:40:13.280
<v Speaker 13>what a company needs to show to have a successful IPO.

0:40:13.440 --> 0:40:18.760
<v Speaker 13>So public market investors are looking for companies generating significant revenue,

0:40:18.800 --> 0:40:22.120
<v Speaker 13>so Kava generating over five hundred million, and then also

0:40:22.160 --> 0:40:26.160
<v Speaker 13>a mix of growth and profitability. So they stated how

0:40:26.320 --> 0:40:29.080
<v Speaker 13>the majority of their IPO proceeds would go to opening

0:40:29.200 --> 0:40:32.800
<v Speaker 13>more stores, and while they're not profitable, they have strong

0:40:32.920 --> 0:40:35.600
<v Speaker 13>unit economics and they're on a near term path to that.

0:40:35.760 --> 0:40:37.880
<v Speaker 13>So they've kind of laid out the path for the

0:40:37.880 --> 0:40:40.360
<v Speaker 13>boxes other companies will need to check as well.

0:40:41.040 --> 0:40:43.000
<v Speaker 1>So Brionn, I mean, you know, the S and P

0:40:43.120 --> 0:40:46.000
<v Speaker 1>five hundred is a you know, a good chunk this

0:40:46.080 --> 0:40:49.280
<v Speaker 1>year ten eleven twelve percent, why haven't we seen more deals?

0:40:49.719 --> 0:40:53.200
<v Speaker 1>Because the deals we've seen ken View, Kava have been

0:40:53.239 --> 0:40:56.319
<v Speaker 1>wildly successful, and there's got to be a a you know,

0:40:57.080 --> 0:41:01.000
<v Speaker 1>a backlog that you know is incredibly huge. Now for

0:41:01.080 --> 0:41:02.080
<v Speaker 1>most of these underwriters, I.

0:41:02.080 --> 0:41:07.760
<v Speaker 13>Would think absolutely, you have globally over twelve hundred unicorn companies.

0:41:07.840 --> 0:41:11.440
<v Speaker 13>So these are private companies valued at over a billion dollars,

0:41:11.840 --> 0:41:14.520
<v Speaker 13>many that are sitting on the sidelines and we're waiting

0:41:14.680 --> 0:41:17.520
<v Speaker 13>for the market to turn around. So while the market's

0:41:17.560 --> 0:41:20.520
<v Speaker 13>down a bit today, the SMPS at a fourteen month high,

0:41:20.600 --> 0:41:23.200
<v Speaker 13>the VIX is at its lowest level since February of

0:41:23.239 --> 0:41:25.799
<v Speaker 13>twenty twenty, and as you said, we've seen a few

0:41:25.800 --> 0:41:30.240
<v Speaker 13>successful IPOs, So I think companies who have strong business

0:41:30.239 --> 0:41:33.840
<v Speaker 13>fundamentals and have put the right hires in place really

0:41:33.880 --> 0:41:37.239
<v Speaker 13>should start to think about capitalizing on this market opportunity.

0:41:37.880 --> 0:41:40.040
<v Speaker 6>And Paul and I were actually just talking about a

0:41:40.040 --> 0:41:42.520
<v Speaker 6>story Lena Popoina Dita on our US Equities team about

0:41:42.560 --> 0:41:45.080
<v Speaker 6>how Goldman Sachs was saying, the IPO bus looks like

0:41:45.120 --> 0:41:48.480
<v Speaker 6>it's ready to boom once again looking at that data,

0:41:48.880 --> 0:41:51.520
<v Speaker 6>do you think that is when you're seeing a call

0:41:51.600 --> 0:41:54.640
<v Speaker 6>like that from Goldman Sex that you'll see more firms

0:41:54.719 --> 0:41:58.600
<v Speaker 6>kind of jump in and join that kind of call.

0:41:58.760 --> 0:42:01.520
<v Speaker 13>I think it's certainly in encouraging, and there is a

0:42:01.520 --> 0:42:05.200
<v Speaker 13>lot of pent up demand both for liquidity from early

0:42:05.239 --> 0:42:07.960
<v Speaker 13>employees and shareholders of these companies who have been waiting

0:42:08.280 --> 0:42:11.400
<v Speaker 13>ten fifteen years for an IPO, but then also for

0:42:11.520 --> 0:42:16.040
<v Speaker 13>investor access. I think there is this desire to participate

0:42:16.520 --> 0:42:20.480
<v Speaker 13>in innovation and growth, and with companies staying private longer,

0:42:20.520 --> 0:42:24.640
<v Speaker 13>that's happening in the private market. So once these growing

0:42:24.680 --> 0:42:27.279
<v Speaker 13>companies do make their public market debut, I think they

0:42:27.320 --> 0:42:31.600
<v Speaker 13>will be warm received, will be received warmly, So I

0:42:31.640 --> 0:42:34.680
<v Speaker 13>would say that, like the Goldman Report is painting the

0:42:34.760 --> 0:42:35.240
<v Speaker 13>right picture.

0:42:36.080 --> 0:42:38.480
<v Speaker 1>So the last eighteen months have been the slowest initial

0:42:38.480 --> 0:42:43.920
<v Speaker 1>public offering market really since a great financial crisis. I

0:42:43.960 --> 0:42:46.360
<v Speaker 1>guess I'm just wondering what the catalyst is going to

0:42:46.400 --> 0:42:50.640
<v Speaker 1>be here brand because it feels like, you know, just

0:42:50.680 --> 0:42:53.759
<v Speaker 1>by judging by recent deals, i'd be hitting a market

0:42:53.840 --> 0:42:54.160
<v Speaker 1>right here.

0:42:54.200 --> 0:42:55.880
<v Speaker 2>I'm not sure why people are waiting.

0:42:56.920 --> 0:43:02.279
<v Speaker 13>We're starting to see more companies confidentially file or you know,

0:43:02.360 --> 0:43:05.160
<v Speaker 13>make the indications that they're preparing for an IPO, so

0:43:05.600 --> 0:43:09.080
<v Speaker 13>maybe hiring a new head of investor relations, hiring a

0:43:09.120 --> 0:43:13.040
<v Speaker 13>new CFO. But there are companies you know who are

0:43:13.120 --> 0:43:16.040
<v Speaker 13>in the process that I think public market investors will

0:43:16.080 --> 0:43:19.520
<v Speaker 13>be excited about. Arm Is one. This is the British

0:43:19.600 --> 0:43:24.600
<v Speaker 13>SoftBank backed microchip company that tried to merge with Navidio

0:43:24.719 --> 0:43:28.840
<v Speaker 13>last year. That didn't work out for regulatory reasons, but

0:43:28.880 --> 0:43:31.440
<v Speaker 13>they were looking at a forty billion dollar valuation at

0:43:31.440 --> 0:43:34.839
<v Speaker 13>that time and they've confidentially filed for a USIPO. They're

0:43:34.920 --> 0:43:37.040
<v Speaker 13>looking to raise eight to ten billions. So I think

0:43:37.080 --> 0:43:39.319
<v Speaker 13>that's an exciting one that we'll see coming down the

0:43:39.320 --> 0:43:42.360
<v Speaker 13>pipe at some point this year, and more of these

0:43:42.600 --> 0:43:45.960
<v Speaker 13>examples will kind of, you know, give that nudge to

0:43:46.120 --> 0:43:48.200
<v Speaker 13>additional companies to test the markets.

0:43:48.760 --> 0:43:52.239
<v Speaker 6>To Paul's point talking about the IPO market, especially last year,

0:43:52.280 --> 0:43:55.120
<v Speaker 6>it was facing its worst year in about two decades.

0:43:55.200 --> 0:43:58.640
<v Speaker 6>Is given the backdrop of inflation and then higher interest rates,

0:43:58.640 --> 0:44:01.439
<v Speaker 6>how does the Federal Reserve in their interest rate path

0:44:01.560 --> 0:44:03.760
<v Speaker 6>play into this as far as if they're getting close

0:44:03.800 --> 0:44:06.480
<v Speaker 6>to this peak point here, what that means for the

0:44:06.520 --> 0:44:08.240
<v Speaker 6>trajectory of the IPO market.

0:44:09.320 --> 0:44:14.000
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, we saw that rate increases have slowed down, so

0:44:14.400 --> 0:44:18.200
<v Speaker 13>I think that's a positive. It's showing that inflation is

0:44:18.239 --> 0:44:21.799
<v Speaker 13>getting a bit more under control and there will be

0:44:22.239 --> 0:44:25.839
<v Speaker 13>likely future rate hikes, but there's a little less uncertainty

0:44:26.360 --> 0:44:30.040
<v Speaker 13>around that. But I think it really backonds to the

0:44:30.080 --> 0:44:34.400
<v Speaker 13>point of investor interest in growth. So they want, you know,

0:44:34.719 --> 0:44:39.880
<v Speaker 13>large growth opportunities and the ability to really capitalize on

0:44:39.960 --> 0:44:43.280
<v Speaker 13>greater returns, you know, in a higher interest rate environment

0:44:43.320 --> 0:44:44.759
<v Speaker 13>where your cash could be making more.

0:44:45.640 --> 0:44:49.080
<v Speaker 1>So brandis are there any industries that the market might

0:44:49.120 --> 0:44:51.200
<v Speaker 1>be more receptive to right now? Because I'm just saying

0:44:51.239 --> 0:44:55.200
<v Speaker 1>that Cava was a restaurant business, ken View was healthcare.

0:44:55.920 --> 0:44:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, these aren't like the super sexiest things like

0:44:58.480 --> 0:45:01.520
<v Speaker 1>technology or something. So what are you hearing from the

0:45:01.560 --> 0:45:03.840
<v Speaker 1>bankers in terms of what industries might be, you know,

0:45:03.960 --> 0:45:06.320
<v Speaker 1>most receptive of by the public.

0:45:07.200 --> 0:45:10.719
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, So in the private markets, we're seeing a few

0:45:10.840 --> 0:45:16.000
<v Speaker 13>sectors with the greatest investor interest. Those are AI and

0:45:16.080 --> 0:45:21.279
<v Speaker 13>machine learning companies. Not surprisingly, fintech is generating a lot

0:45:21.320 --> 0:45:24.920
<v Speaker 13>of interest, and then software as a service businesses as well.

0:45:24.960 --> 0:45:29.200
<v Speaker 13>So those are some categories to think about where there

0:45:29.200 --> 0:45:32.640
<v Speaker 13>may be public market interest as well for the right

0:45:32.680 --> 0:45:34.840
<v Speaker 13>candidates to go public. But that's what we're seeing in

0:45:34.880 --> 0:45:37.319
<v Speaker 13>the private markets at equity zen, What.

0:45:37.239 --> 0:45:39.400
<v Speaker 6>Are the next IPOs that are on your radar?

0:45:41.000 --> 0:45:43.680
<v Speaker 13>Yeah, arm is one I'd mentioned that I think could

0:45:43.680 --> 0:45:49.319
<v Speaker 13>be interesting. Sheen is another one, the Chinese fast fashion retailer.

0:45:50.040 --> 0:45:53.880
<v Speaker 13>They just raised more capital at a down round just

0:45:54.000 --> 0:45:58.359
<v Speaker 13>earlier this year after raising at you know, a very

0:45:58.360 --> 0:46:01.400
<v Speaker 13>aggressive hundred billion dollar value back in April of twenty

0:46:01.440 --> 0:46:05.120
<v Speaker 13>twenty one. But this is the profitable, fast growing company

0:46:06.000 --> 0:46:08.479
<v Speaker 13>with a global market that is said that they're looking

0:46:08.560 --> 0:46:11.200
<v Speaker 13>to IPO later this year, So I think that's another

0:46:11.239 --> 0:46:12.600
<v Speaker 13>one people will have their eye on.

0:46:13.160 --> 0:46:15.879
<v Speaker 1>You bring up a good point here, just wondering about

0:46:15.880 --> 0:46:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the types of names that could come public here. And

0:46:19.120 --> 0:46:22.600
<v Speaker 1>valuation is a big issue here because I could I

0:46:22.640 --> 0:46:25.120
<v Speaker 1>can imagine me being an IPO banker going into with

0:46:25.160 --> 0:46:27.719
<v Speaker 1>evaluation that would represent a down round for a lot

0:46:27.760 --> 0:46:29.720
<v Speaker 1>of these companies and that's a problem.

0:46:29.760 --> 0:46:32.040
<v Speaker 2>So are we seeing that in the market.

0:46:33.440 --> 0:46:36.680
<v Speaker 13>I think it's just a reality of where we are,

0:46:36.800 --> 0:46:40.960
<v Speaker 13>where companies raised capital at these aggressive valuations in twenty

0:46:41.000 --> 0:46:43.960
<v Speaker 13>twenty and twenty twenty one, and on equity Zience platform,

0:46:44.000 --> 0:46:46.480
<v Speaker 13>we're seeing the average company trading at a forty to

0:46:46.520 --> 0:46:51.120
<v Speaker 13>fifty percent discount to that last primary round reflection or

0:46:51.160 --> 0:46:54.960
<v Speaker 13>reflecting that correction in the market. So I think some

0:46:55.040 --> 0:46:58.840
<v Speaker 13>companies may choose to raise additional primary capital as a

0:46:58.880 --> 0:47:02.160
<v Speaker 13>means of also reset adding their valuation before they go

0:47:02.239 --> 0:47:05.319
<v Speaker 13>to IPO. Others may rip off the band aid and

0:47:05.560 --> 0:47:08.799
<v Speaker 13>understand that they may be you know, raising out a

0:47:08.840 --> 0:47:13.200
<v Speaker 13>lower valuation in an IPO. So it's different paths that

0:47:13.280 --> 0:47:16.759
<v Speaker 13>different companies will take. But I think ultimately they need

0:47:16.800 --> 0:47:19.200
<v Speaker 13>to come up with the solution, you know, both for

0:47:19.400 --> 0:47:21.360
<v Speaker 13>liquidity and broader access.

0:47:22.280 --> 0:47:24.560
<v Speaker 1>Hey, Brian, thanks so much for joining us. Really appreciate

0:47:24.600 --> 0:47:27.200
<v Speaker 1>getting a few minutes of your time. Brian Lynch, head

0:47:27.239 --> 0:47:29.000
<v Speaker 1>of Market Insight at Equity Zen.

0:47:29.320 --> 0:47:32.920
<v Speaker 7>You're listening to the tape cancer live program Bloomberg Markets

0:47:33.000 --> 0:47:36.399
<v Speaker 7>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the tune

0:47:36.440 --> 0:47:38.120
<v Speaker 7>in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and.

0:47:38.080 --> 0:47:39.399
<v Speaker 8>The Bloomberg Business App.

0:47:39.440 --> 0:47:42.239
<v Speaker 7>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:47:42.280 --> 0:47:48.200
<v Speaker 7>flagship New York station. Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:47:48.080 --> 0:47:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Lots going on in terms of global geopolitics, if you will.

0:47:52.280 --> 0:47:55.080
<v Speaker 1>Mc muloy joins us. He's co founder of the Lobo Institute,

0:47:55.520 --> 0:47:59.520
<v Speaker 1>former senior fellow at Middle East Initiative Formula Deputy Assistant

0:47:59.560 --> 0:48:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Second Defense for the Middle East at the US Department

0:48:02.040 --> 0:48:05.720
<v Speaker 1>of Defense. And also he is a former US Marine

0:48:05.719 --> 0:48:09.200
<v Speaker 1>Infantry officer, so we thank him for his service. Hey, Mick,

0:48:09.280 --> 0:48:11.440
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot to talk about here. We appreciate getting

0:48:11.440 --> 0:48:13.480
<v Speaker 1>some more of your time. Let's start with China and

0:48:13.600 --> 0:48:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Secretary of State Blincoln, how would you kind of characterize

0:48:17.239 --> 0:48:20.640
<v Speaker 1>that visit the success or lack thereof.

0:48:22.680 --> 0:48:24.640
<v Speaker 14>So great to be with you, I think right now

0:48:24.640 --> 0:48:27.520
<v Speaker 14>we can say it's somewhere in between. It's good that

0:48:27.600 --> 0:48:31.200
<v Speaker 14>it happened. It's important that the superpowers of the world,

0:48:31.239 --> 0:48:36.560
<v Speaker 14>particularly those with nuclear weapons, are talking and not going

0:48:36.600 --> 0:48:40.600
<v Speaker 14>more towards the potential for our conflict. But one of

0:48:40.640 --> 0:48:42.960
<v Speaker 14>the main things that we wanted to do here was

0:48:43.000 --> 0:48:47.240
<v Speaker 14>to get military to military communications back started. That's something

0:48:47.280 --> 0:48:49.879
<v Speaker 14>that during the entirety of the Cold War, the United

0:48:49.880 --> 0:48:54.000
<v Speaker 14>States and sovi Union did mostly because we wanted to

0:48:54.200 --> 0:48:59.160
<v Speaker 14>avoid a misinterpretation that led to an engagement that could

0:48:59.239 --> 0:49:01.759
<v Speaker 14>lead to a conflict. So that's why I think Secretary

0:49:01.800 --> 0:49:04.040
<v Speaker 14>blink And has been so emphatic about that. And it

0:49:04.080 --> 0:49:07.640
<v Speaker 14>looks like that did not happen, but they did have

0:49:07.719 --> 0:49:12.200
<v Speaker 14>agreement to carry on and have another engagement between the

0:49:12.280 --> 0:49:15.880
<v Speaker 14>Foreign Minister and our Secretary of State and potentially have

0:49:16.040 --> 0:49:19.400
<v Speaker 14>our presidents meet at st the G twenty. So it

0:49:19.920 --> 0:49:22.520
<v Speaker 14>wasn't a failure, but it wasn't what we needed, which

0:49:22.600 --> 0:49:26.320
<v Speaker 14>was to make sure that our militaries have the ability

0:49:26.360 --> 0:49:28.840
<v Speaker 14>to talk to one another to avoid an escalation that

0:49:28.920 --> 0:49:30.160
<v Speaker 14>need Cutter would want.

0:49:30.640 --> 0:49:30.799
<v Speaker 4>Nick.

0:49:30.880 --> 0:49:33.360
<v Speaker 6>There were reports earlier this year that the US was

0:49:33.400 --> 0:49:38.120
<v Speaker 6>planning to increase the number of US troops training Taiwanese forces,

0:49:38.680 --> 0:49:41.640
<v Speaker 6>not confirmed though obviously by the government. Have we gotten

0:49:42.480 --> 0:49:45.280
<v Speaker 6>new indication on that front from his visit this week.

0:49:47.640 --> 0:49:50.400
<v Speaker 14>So one of the things that I think has irritated

0:49:50.560 --> 0:49:54.400
<v Speaker 14>China so much is that we have new agreements with

0:49:54.480 --> 0:49:58.279
<v Speaker 14>the Philippines, for example, to put four new or four

0:49:58.400 --> 0:50:02.120
<v Speaker 14>bases where less military will be, what the Marine Corps

0:50:02.120 --> 0:50:04.840
<v Speaker 14>doing with the lictoral Regiment. And now to your point

0:50:05.200 --> 0:50:10.240
<v Speaker 14>that we are actively increasing the number of trainers in Taiwan,

0:50:11.160 --> 0:50:13.319
<v Speaker 14>that is in our interest, it's in the interest of

0:50:13.320 --> 0:50:16.920
<v Speaker 14>our allies in the region. But it's obviously something that

0:50:17.040 --> 0:50:19.880
<v Speaker 14>China doesn't want to see if they still have a

0:50:19.960 --> 0:50:24.960
<v Speaker 14>design on taking Taiwan. So that's going to be attention.

0:50:25.120 --> 0:50:28.759
<v Speaker 14>I don't think we could have one hundred diplomatic engagements

0:50:29.080 --> 0:50:30.719
<v Speaker 14>and we're never going to see the eye to eye

0:50:30.840 --> 0:50:34.040
<v Speaker 14>on the issue of Taiwan, but it is something that

0:50:34.080 --> 0:50:37.840
<v Speaker 14>we need to address and then focus on the areas

0:50:37.840 --> 0:50:40.000
<v Speaker 14>where the United States and China do have an interest,

0:50:40.200 --> 0:50:44.799
<v Speaker 14>which is largely economics. Our economies are tied, not economists.

0:50:44.840 --> 0:50:46.840
<v Speaker 14>But I think I know I can say that, and

0:50:46.880 --> 0:50:50.440
<v Speaker 14>it's important that we focus on those areas, understanding that

0:50:50.480 --> 0:50:52.279
<v Speaker 14>there's certain areas that will never agree on.

0:50:52.920 --> 0:50:54.840
<v Speaker 1>All Right, Mick, let's switch gears because I know we

0:50:54.880 --> 0:50:59.440
<v Speaker 1>can do that with you. Ukraine, I guess the counter

0:51:00.120 --> 0:51:02.399
<v Speaker 1>offensive is underway. If it is kind of how would

0:51:02.440 --> 0:51:05.160
<v Speaker 1>you characterize it and what are your thoughts given that

0:51:05.239 --> 0:51:06.160
<v Speaker 1>situation over there?

0:51:08.200 --> 0:51:11.960
<v Speaker 14>So I would characterize it as smart. From the Ukrainian perspective,

0:51:12.719 --> 0:51:16.759
<v Speaker 14>they could they could have gone all in, and they

0:51:16.800 --> 0:51:19.640
<v Speaker 14>could have had a catastrophic failure. What I think they've

0:51:19.640 --> 0:51:24.040
<v Speaker 14>done is they've probed the Russian lines. They've retaken some

0:51:24.280 --> 0:51:27.440
<v Speaker 14>territory I think around one hundred and fourteen square kilometers

0:51:27.520 --> 0:51:31.280
<v Speaker 14>right now, about eight pounds, But they haven't committed the bulk,

0:51:31.400 --> 0:51:33.960
<v Speaker 14>the mass of their force because They're really trying to

0:51:34.000 --> 0:51:36.799
<v Speaker 14>find out where the Russians are most runnable and then

0:51:36.920 --> 0:51:39.880
<v Speaker 14>exploit it to a point where it puts them so

0:51:40.080 --> 0:51:42.759
<v Speaker 14>much on their back, but that they can start regaining

0:51:43.239 --> 0:51:45.680
<v Speaker 14>a lot of territory. So I think it is going

0:51:45.760 --> 0:51:48.880
<v Speaker 14>where the Ukrainians expected it to, maybe not what everybody

0:51:48.960 --> 0:51:52.680
<v Speaker 14>expected it, where it would be a more massive attack

0:51:53.560 --> 0:51:55.920
<v Speaker 14>acts of attacks. But I think they're doing it the

0:51:56.000 --> 0:52:00.000
<v Speaker 14>right way because they have skill, they have the better equipment,

0:52:00.120 --> 0:52:02.080
<v Speaker 14>but they also have a problem and they don't have

0:52:02.280 --> 0:52:06.600
<v Speaker 14>as many soldiers, so they have to be very cautious

0:52:06.719 --> 0:52:11.040
<v Speaker 14>one where they bend those soldiers and try to find

0:52:11.080 --> 0:52:13.840
<v Speaker 14>the vulnerabilities, the gaps and teams, if you will, in

0:52:13.880 --> 0:52:15.840
<v Speaker 14>the Russian defenses. So I think this is going to

0:52:15.840 --> 0:52:19.240
<v Speaker 14>be something that builds rather than a big big bang

0:52:19.239 --> 0:52:19.840
<v Speaker 14>at the beginning.

0:52:20.080 --> 0:52:21.920
<v Speaker 6>What is it going to take to get Russia out

0:52:21.920 --> 0:52:24.880
<v Speaker 6>of Ukraine?

0:52:26.080 --> 0:52:29.680
<v Speaker 14>It's going to be tough. I think what the Ukrainians

0:52:29.680 --> 0:52:31.879
<v Speaker 14>are trying to do is get to a point where

0:52:31.880 --> 0:52:35.400
<v Speaker 14>they challenge their ability to maintain their presence in Crimea

0:52:35.920 --> 0:52:39.440
<v Speaker 14>something they had thought they had harready gotten. They've done

0:52:39.440 --> 0:52:42.800
<v Speaker 14>it in twenty fourteen and never thought that that would

0:52:42.800 --> 0:52:47.560
<v Speaker 14>be challenged, and it is very strategically important to them

0:52:48.040 --> 0:52:51.000
<v Speaker 14>if the Ukrainians can get to a point where they

0:52:51.080 --> 0:52:54.479
<v Speaker 14>challenge their ability to stay there. That's why they're trying

0:52:54.520 --> 0:52:57.200
<v Speaker 14>to cut off the land bridge by pushing all the

0:52:57.200 --> 0:53:00.600
<v Speaker 14>way through Zaparicha to be able to cut them off.

0:53:00.640 --> 0:53:02.560
<v Speaker 14>The only way they can get to Crimea after that

0:53:02.680 --> 0:53:04.920
<v Speaker 14>is that bridge, which is vulnable. But if they get

0:53:04.960 --> 0:53:08.480
<v Speaker 14>to that point, perhaps they'll be at times they can negotiate.

0:53:08.920 --> 0:53:10.680
<v Speaker 14>I don't know if the Ukrainians will be willing to

0:53:10.680 --> 0:53:14.520
<v Speaker 14>give any territory, including Crimea, but Russia might get to

0:53:14.600 --> 0:53:17.840
<v Speaker 14>a point where they realized that they might lose Crimea,

0:53:18.000 --> 0:53:20.920
<v Speaker 14>something they never thought would happen when they launched this invasion.

0:53:21.719 --> 0:53:27.200
<v Speaker 1>Mike Holt important are critical? Are fighter jets for Ukraine?

0:53:27.239 --> 0:53:28.640
<v Speaker 1>Are they a game changer or not.

0:53:28.640 --> 0:53:31.520
<v Speaker 4>So much so.

0:53:31.640 --> 0:53:35.880
<v Speaker 14>I think that with all the other items that they've gotten,

0:53:35.920 --> 0:53:38.080
<v Speaker 14>you know, from the M one tanks, the other main

0:53:38.120 --> 0:53:42.439
<v Speaker 14>battle tanks, the infantry fighting vehicles, this is just one

0:53:42.480 --> 0:53:44.680
<v Speaker 14>more piece of the puzzle that's going to give them

0:53:44.680 --> 0:53:46.880
<v Speaker 14>the ability to go on the offensive and to the

0:53:46.920 --> 0:53:50.960
<v Speaker 14>point where they can take back key terrains. F sixteams.

0:53:51.120 --> 0:53:54.560
<v Speaker 14>They're good in the air. They can knock incoming missiles,

0:53:54.560 --> 0:53:56.960
<v Speaker 14>they can knock enemy fighters, but they can also do

0:53:57.040 --> 0:54:00.319
<v Speaker 14>qulose air support, and that's something desperately needed when you're

0:54:00.320 --> 0:54:03.800
<v Speaker 14>trying to attack fortified positions in which the Russians have

0:54:03.960 --> 0:54:08.720
<v Speaker 14>been in for so long. Developing so game changer close

0:54:08.760 --> 0:54:11.480
<v Speaker 14>to it, But I think the game changers of all

0:54:11.480 --> 0:54:15.000
<v Speaker 14>the things that you've given recently that have really given

0:54:15.040 --> 0:54:17.040
<v Speaker 14>them the ability to do this counter offensive in a

0:54:17.080 --> 0:54:20.200
<v Speaker 14>way that could be really meaningful, that really put Russia

0:54:20.280 --> 0:54:22.160
<v Speaker 14>in a position where they might not be able to

0:54:22.160 --> 0:54:26.360
<v Speaker 14>stay stay in the positions that they had occupied for

0:54:26.400 --> 0:54:26.839
<v Speaker 14>so long.

0:54:27.160 --> 0:54:29.319
<v Speaker 6>Nick Willy have about thirty seconds left, but have to

0:54:29.320 --> 0:54:32.520
<v Speaker 6>get your take about this Titanic vessel. What do you

0:54:32.560 --> 0:54:33.759
<v Speaker 6>think is going to happen there?

0:54:35.960 --> 0:54:38.799
<v Speaker 14>Well, I certainly hope that we can get out and

0:54:38.880 --> 0:54:42.360
<v Speaker 14>find these individuals and rescue them. It's obviously you know,

0:54:42.520 --> 0:54:47.040
<v Speaker 14>thoughts to them and their families, but it's going to

0:54:47.080 --> 0:54:50.000
<v Speaker 14>be difficult. I mean, they're going to have to find

0:54:50.880 --> 0:54:52.600
<v Speaker 14>If you think about it, look how long it took

0:54:52.680 --> 0:54:55.200
<v Speaker 14>to find the Titanic itself. Well, the Titanic is nine

0:54:55.280 --> 0:54:57.960
<v Speaker 14>hundred feet fall. How long is the Titan. That's the

0:54:58.040 --> 0:55:01.080
<v Speaker 14>name of the submersible lends is twenty feed long. So

0:55:01.120 --> 0:55:02.960
<v Speaker 14>they're going to have to figure out where it was,

0:55:03.480 --> 0:55:07.200
<v Speaker 14>which is difficult because it doesn't have any communications. And

0:55:07.200 --> 0:55:08.520
<v Speaker 14>then they're going to have to get all the way

0:55:08.560 --> 0:55:11.000
<v Speaker 14>down there and figure out how to tether it to

0:55:11.040 --> 0:55:14.040
<v Speaker 14>another subversible and bring it to the surface. Let's hope

0:55:14.080 --> 0:55:16.480
<v Speaker 14>they can do it, but it is not going to

0:55:16.520 --> 0:55:17.000
<v Speaker 14>be easy.

0:55:17.040 --> 0:55:18.799
<v Speaker 5>It's going to be a challenge, all right, Nick, thank

0:55:18.840 --> 0:55:19.200
<v Speaker 5>you so much.

0:55:19.239 --> 0:55:19.759
<v Speaker 2>We appreciate it.

0:55:19.840 --> 0:55:23.319
<v Speaker 1>McK mouloy, co founder of the Lobo Institute, getting his

0:55:23.400 --> 0:55:25.240
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on some geopolitical issues.

0:55:26.640 --> 0:55:29.759
<v Speaker 3>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcasts. You can

0:55:29.800 --> 0:55:33.560
<v Speaker 3>subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever

0:55:33.640 --> 0:55:37.360
<v Speaker 3>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter

0:55:37.560 --> 0:55:39.480
<v Speaker 3>at Matt Miller nineteen seventy three.

0:55:39.920 --> 0:55:42.400
<v Speaker 2>And I'm Paul Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:55:42.440 --> 0:55:45.120
<v Speaker 1>Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at

0:55:45.120 --> 0:55:46.879
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Radio.