WEBVTT - Bloomberg Businessweek Weekend - May 3rd, 2019

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:02.360
<v Speaker 1>Hi, I'm Jason Kelly and I'm Carol Masser. Welcome to

0:00:02.400 --> 0:00:05.280
<v Speaker 1>the Bloomberg Business Week Weekend podcast. This week we bring

0:00:05.280 --> 0:00:07.080
<v Speaker 1>you highlights from our trip to the Milk and Institute

0:00:07.080 --> 0:00:10.440
<v Speaker 1>Global Conference in Los Angeles, and it was all about

0:00:10.520 --> 0:00:13.600
<v Speaker 1>driving shared prosperity and folks from all walks of life,

0:00:13.680 --> 0:00:17.360
<v Speaker 1>all different types of industries, having really really smart conversations

0:00:17.400 --> 0:00:20.319
<v Speaker 1>getting into complicated subjects. We also hear from some of

0:00:20.320 --> 0:00:23.440
<v Speaker 1>the biggest names in business, politics and finance. Well and

0:00:23.480 --> 0:00:26.760
<v Speaker 1>where else, apparently are you going to run into Steve

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 1>Schwartzman from Blackstone, Bruce Flatt from Brookfield, Bob Dudley from BP,

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:37.239
<v Speaker 1>but also the Edge Laura Dern. We talked to all

0:00:37.280 --> 0:00:39.440
<v Speaker 1>of them. It's like the dream cocktail party and we

0:00:39.440 --> 0:00:41.680
<v Speaker 1>were there first. Up, though, Jason, we spoke with oak

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:45.240
<v Speaker 1>Tree Capital co chairman Howard Marks. You are well known

0:00:45.720 --> 0:00:49.360
<v Speaker 1>in the world as someone who knows just about everything

0:00:49.400 --> 0:00:52.680
<v Speaker 1>about credit and distress. Is there any distress in the

0:00:52.720 --> 0:00:57.000
<v Speaker 1>world right now? There is distress mostly outside the You well,

0:00:57.000 --> 0:01:00.600
<v Speaker 1>there's some in the US. Retail is in distress, some

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:05.119
<v Speaker 1>energy is in distress with low energy prices. Outside the US,

0:01:06.319 --> 0:01:10.720
<v Speaker 1>it's a more widespread less shotgun. Um. You know there

0:01:10.720 --> 0:01:15.280
<v Speaker 1>are some npls in in the European banks. We we

0:01:15.440 --> 0:01:17.959
<v Speaker 1>buy some of those. And there's a big pile up,

0:01:18.000 --> 0:01:21.920
<v Speaker 1>of course of npls in China. Um and uh, and

0:01:22.160 --> 0:01:24.960
<v Speaker 1>we're we're looking at those. You are looking at them,

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:28.000
<v Speaker 1>but not buying it. We're investing, We're buying. We have

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:32.520
<v Speaker 1>close to four years of experience doing it. We we

0:01:32.640 --> 0:01:35.840
<v Speaker 1>concluded four years ago that it was very important to

0:01:36.000 --> 0:01:39.720
<v Speaker 1>start building the experience. You know, you can't go into

0:01:39.720 --> 0:01:44.160
<v Speaker 1>a market when it becomes propitious without some background, So

0:01:44.920 --> 0:01:48.560
<v Speaker 1>clearly you have to build the experience in advance. How

0:01:48.600 --> 0:01:51.240
<v Speaker 1>do you see China, especially with the backdrop of I

0:01:51.240 --> 0:01:53.440
<v Speaker 1>feel like the tensions between the United States and China

0:01:53.560 --> 0:01:56.560
<v Speaker 1>certainly not new, We've seen them through several administrations. But

0:01:56.800 --> 0:02:00.040
<v Speaker 1>how do you view that that political lens for this

0:02:00.200 --> 0:02:04.440
<v Speaker 1>is the investment lens. Well, it's it's not easy, um,

0:02:04.480 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>But you know, the way I think of it, Carol,

0:02:06.800 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 1>is that Europe and Japan are economic senior citizens. The

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:16.240
<v Speaker 1>U S is a mature adult, and China's an adolescent.

0:02:17.080 --> 0:02:19.399
<v Speaker 1>And if you've ever had an adolescent in your house

0:02:20.520 --> 0:02:23.320
<v Speaker 1>now and I know Jason has then you know that

0:02:23.360 --> 0:02:29.560
<v Speaker 1>there are it's tempestuous ups and downs, UM chaotic, but

0:02:29.919 --> 0:02:33.480
<v Speaker 1>you also know that the adolescents best decades are ahead.

0:02:34.440 --> 0:02:37.400
<v Speaker 1>And you know over the next twenty years, which is

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:41.480
<v Speaker 1>going to grow faster, China or the US? Simple question.

0:02:41.720 --> 0:02:45.920
<v Speaker 1>In my opinion, China will have rapid growth. UM. Once

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:48.160
<v Speaker 1>in a while, there will be You'll have some bad days.

0:02:48.160 --> 0:02:50.600
<v Speaker 1>You might even have some bad years once in a while.

0:02:51.160 --> 0:02:55.840
<v Speaker 1>There may be issues over uh macro factors. But I

0:02:55.880 --> 0:02:59.440
<v Speaker 1>think that uh, you know, one of the largest economies

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:03.080
<v Speaker 1>in the world. UH, you can't ignore it, and so

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:07.720
<v Speaker 1>do you invest differently. They're going forward in a more

0:03:07.840 --> 0:03:12.280
<v Speaker 1>meaningful way, especially given now the place where you're going

0:03:12.360 --> 0:03:16.359
<v Speaker 1>to have oak Tree housed within UH Brookfield. You guys

0:03:16.400 --> 0:03:19.320
<v Speaker 1>are combining operations there. What is the opportunity? How big

0:03:19.360 --> 0:03:22.600
<v Speaker 1>does the opportunity get in China? The numbers are very big.

0:03:23.280 --> 0:03:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Everything in China is really big in terms of numbers. UH.

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:30.040
<v Speaker 1>We have been moving in cautiously. We will continue to

0:03:30.080 --> 0:03:33.040
<v Speaker 1>do so, but we are amping up at this time.

0:03:33.720 --> 0:03:37.400
<v Speaker 1>I feel like there is such Howard animosity. Certainly, I

0:03:37.400 --> 0:03:41.320
<v Speaker 1>think there's a U S perspective of thinking. China's the enemy. Uh.

0:03:41.360 --> 0:03:43.840
<v Speaker 1>And they're certainly got their long term you know, planning

0:03:43.880 --> 0:03:45.640
<v Speaker 1>in terms of industries and how they want to be

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>much more sophisticated, whether it's technology and AI and so

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:49.640
<v Speaker 1>on and so forth. And we look at that as

0:03:49.640 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 1>a bad thing and we want to stop them from

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:55.040
<v Speaker 1>doing that. How do we get a better understanding of

0:03:55.080 --> 0:03:57.560
<v Speaker 1>what's going on from China? You've I'm assuming, been there,

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:01.080
<v Speaker 1>You've talked to various companies and investors. What what are

0:04:01.120 --> 0:04:05.000
<v Speaker 1>we missing and not understanding? Maybe? Is there such animosity? Well,

0:04:05.040 --> 0:04:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I've never felt any animosity. I've been going there for

0:04:07.560 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 1>about ten years or so and more. I guess is

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:13.720
<v Speaker 1>it competitive? Though? Does China look at the US as

0:04:13.760 --> 0:04:18.280
<v Speaker 1>competitive and vice versa? Certainly on a geopolitical stage, uh?

0:04:18.320 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 1>And within specific industries, I think, Um, that's the nature

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:27.359
<v Speaker 1>of business. Uh. You know, Uh, everybody competes. It brings

0:04:27.360 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 1>out the best of us. And uh uh you know,

0:04:31.400 --> 0:04:34.240
<v Speaker 1>it's really interesting to be in China and look at

0:04:34.320 --> 0:04:39.120
<v Speaker 1>China and think about how they integrate a essentially controlled

0:04:39.160 --> 0:04:42.040
<v Speaker 1>economy with free enterprise, which they have a lot of.

0:04:42.520 --> 0:04:46.279
<v Speaker 1>And how did the two call exist? Um? But Uh,

0:04:46.720 --> 0:04:51.800
<v Speaker 1>my latest memo talked about UM some reforms that took

0:04:51.800 --> 0:04:56.240
<v Speaker 1>place in China UH forty years ago. UH, and it

0:04:56.920 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 1>created much more emphasis on rewards and incentives. UM and UH.

0:05:03.440 --> 0:05:09.279
<v Speaker 1>I think that I think that China is highly incentivized

0:05:09.320 --> 0:05:13.080
<v Speaker 1>to work towards those rewards, even if not the whole

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:16.920
<v Speaker 1>economy is characterized by free enterprise. I want to ask

0:05:16.960 --> 0:05:19.760
<v Speaker 1>you about this notion that's out there that maybe the

0:05:20.920 --> 0:05:23.680
<v Speaker 1>markets are in what people are terming sort of a

0:05:23.760 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 1>melt up. You know, that we're just sort of going

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:28.960
<v Speaker 1>and going and going along because there's nothing stopping it

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:31.039
<v Speaker 1>and valuations are getting out of control. What do you

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:33.799
<v Speaker 1>make of that argument. I've been in this business fifty years, Jason,

0:05:33.839 --> 0:05:38.000
<v Speaker 1>I've heard it several times in the past. UM. You know, UH.

0:05:38.120 --> 0:05:41.239
<v Speaker 1>I think that the the best way to think about

0:05:41.279 --> 0:05:44.679
<v Speaker 1>it is by understanding what I call the three stages

0:05:44.680 --> 0:05:47.200
<v Speaker 1>of a bull market. The first stage, when only a

0:05:47.240 --> 0:05:50.240
<v Speaker 1>few far sided people understand that there could be improvement,

0:05:50.760 --> 0:05:54.039
<v Speaker 1>the second stage, when most people see that there is improvement,

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:56.640
<v Speaker 1>and the third stage, when everybody and his brother thinks

0:05:56.680 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 1>things will get better forever. If you buy in the

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:02.200
<v Speaker 1>first stage, you pay bargain prices and you tend to

0:06:02.200 --> 0:06:04.279
<v Speaker 1>make a lot of money. If you're buying the last stage,

0:06:04.480 --> 0:06:07.280
<v Speaker 1>it's much more tricky. I think that when I hear

0:06:07.640 --> 0:06:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the UH stories about perpetual prosperity and trees growing to

0:06:11.920 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 1>the sky, I tend to think we're in the last stage.

0:06:14.880 --> 0:06:17.800
<v Speaker 1>That's Howard Marks, the co chairman of oak Tree Capital

0:06:17.920 --> 0:06:22.120
<v Speaker 1>and of course one of the most followed names in finance.

0:06:22.240 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 1>His memos that he sents to his investors there must reads.

0:06:26.240 --> 0:06:29.280
<v Speaker 1>He's in the news of course with his combination with

0:06:29.520 --> 0:06:32.680
<v Speaker 1>brook Field that is one of the biggest deals from

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:35.080
<v Speaker 1>some of the biggest dealmakers in the world. Plays into

0:06:35.080 --> 0:06:38.200
<v Speaker 1>asset managers getting bigger. We're seeing consolidation. But I always

0:06:38.200 --> 0:06:40.279
<v Speaker 1>love to talk to somebody like Howard who has seen

0:06:40.360 --> 0:06:42.680
<v Speaker 1>lots of market cycles and really looks at things from

0:06:42.680 --> 0:06:45.039
<v Speaker 1>a very smart and deep perspective. And I thought his

0:06:45.240 --> 0:06:48.160
<v Speaker 1>comments about China where especially timely. I was really glad

0:06:48.160 --> 0:06:50.160
<v Speaker 1>we got into that as well. So Carol next up

0:06:50.320 --> 0:06:52.159
<v Speaker 1>from Milk and I had a chance to sit down

0:06:52.160 --> 0:06:55.279
<v Speaker 1>with the CEO VP. That's Bob Dudley. He was coming

0:06:55.279 --> 0:06:57.480
<v Speaker 1>off of earnings, who talked a little bit about that.

0:06:57.520 --> 0:07:00.280
<v Speaker 1>We talked about continuing volatility in the oil mark get

0:07:00.279 --> 0:07:03.320
<v Speaker 1>and of course, you can't talk about just about anything

0:07:03.480 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 1>in the world, not talking about how a tweet can

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:08.600
<v Speaker 1>change your business. But rightfully so, Jason, you started by

0:07:08.600 --> 0:07:11.520
<v Speaker 1>asking him about this quarter's earnings. What was the key

0:07:11.560 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>takeaway for you from earnings this quarter? So this was

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:16.720
<v Speaker 1>our first quarter. Oil prices a little bit down. I

0:07:16.720 --> 0:07:21.280
<v Speaker 1>think resilience in the earning, bang on expectations. Operations work

0:07:21.400 --> 0:07:23.360
<v Speaker 1>very smoothly around the world. We have things that were

0:07:23.400 --> 0:07:26.040
<v Speaker 1>down and off in long plan. So very very pleased

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:31.480
<v Speaker 1>with the earnings and no real big surprises. But one

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:33.800
<v Speaker 1>of the things that people are always interested in is

0:07:33.840 --> 0:07:37.120
<v Speaker 1>your trading business. Uh. You get some details here and there.

0:07:37.160 --> 0:07:39.760
<v Speaker 1>We got a little bit of details about natural gas.

0:07:39.800 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 1>Tell us what was moving there? Well, there was. We

0:07:42.840 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 1>did have a good quarter in the trading, both in

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:48.960
<v Speaker 1>global oil trading and natural gas. Uh l G prices

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:52.160
<v Speaker 1>were moving a bit. Of course, the oil prices very volatile.

0:07:52.280 --> 0:07:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Uh you know, they've been three or four days down

0:07:54.960 --> 0:07:57.600
<v Speaker 1>just on a tweet. We'll see. There is a lot

0:07:57.600 --> 0:08:00.320
<v Speaker 1>of volatility in the oil markets right now. Every one's

0:08:00.320 --> 0:08:03.240
<v Speaker 1>waiting to see about the either extension or no extension

0:08:03.240 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 1>of Iran waivers. I think the market isn't really sure,

0:08:06.480 --> 0:08:08.520
<v Speaker 1>even though they said they won't be extended. If they

0:08:08.520 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 1>are extended, I think you'll see the price of oil

0:08:10.960 --> 0:08:12.800
<v Speaker 1>dip a bit. If they're not. You can see a

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:15.240
<v Speaker 1>drift up here and help us understand a little bit.

0:08:15.280 --> 0:08:18.960
<v Speaker 1>I know it's pretty closely guarded how the trading operation works, um.

0:08:19.000 --> 0:08:21.800
<v Speaker 1>But what was driving especially the the success on the

0:08:21.800 --> 0:08:24.360
<v Speaker 1>oil side. Well, I think on the oil side is

0:08:24.400 --> 0:08:27.920
<v Speaker 1>a position that was taken really by by BB coming

0:08:27.920 --> 0:08:30.600
<v Speaker 1>out of the New Year's season, that we thought that

0:08:30.680 --> 0:08:33.199
<v Speaker 1>all presses were going to tighten. All the data look

0:08:33.280 --> 0:08:35.680
<v Speaker 1>like that. If you remember, they remarkably dropped to about

0:08:35.800 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>fifty dollars a barrel and then come back stronger throughout

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:41.040
<v Speaker 1>the quarter, And I think that was part of the strength. No,

0:08:41.200 --> 0:08:44.240
<v Speaker 1>no special magic trade. It was just we believe the

0:08:44.240 --> 0:08:46.960
<v Speaker 1>prices we're gonna type. And so let's talk about oil

0:08:47.000 --> 0:08:49.280
<v Speaker 1>prices a little bit. As you say, they are highly

0:08:49.280 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 1>susceptible to politics, they're highly susceptible to social media platforms

0:08:54.960 --> 0:08:58.880
<v Speaker 1>and and sentiment. How do you manage that? Well, you can't.

0:08:58.960 --> 0:09:01.160
<v Speaker 1>You can't always get right. I mean, you take it.

0:09:01.200 --> 0:09:03.400
<v Speaker 1>We try to do it on the fundamentals. Long term

0:09:03.480 --> 0:09:05.840
<v Speaker 1>rather than very short term reactions to things. We think

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:08.520
<v Speaker 1>fundamentally the markets are type this year. You sit and

0:09:08.600 --> 0:09:12.000
<v Speaker 1>look at you know, what is unfolding, this Venezuela defying

0:09:12.040 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 1>economic gravity, and reports of more violence in Libya, and

0:09:15.960 --> 0:09:19.440
<v Speaker 1>these things approach the fundamentals, and you look at the

0:09:19.440 --> 0:09:22.920
<v Speaker 1>production growth of the Permian, but it's still bottleneck that

0:09:22.960 --> 0:09:25.360
<v Speaker 1>won't be there forever. So it feels to us a

0:09:25.520 --> 0:09:28.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of tight right now. And what's your biggest worry

0:09:28.440 --> 0:09:30.319
<v Speaker 1>about oil prices as we go through the rest of

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:33.839
<v Speaker 1>nineteen nineteen. Well, for for us, we planned the company

0:09:33.920 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 1>on fifty five dollars a barrow or a very narrow

0:09:36.160 --> 0:09:40.080
<v Speaker 1>fairway for BP. I think if I worry about it

0:09:40.200 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 1>longer term, not short term. Longer term is we end

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:45.520
<v Speaker 1>up either with a spike or a drop, and that's

0:09:45.520 --> 0:09:47.360
<v Speaker 1>not good for the world. It's not good for planning.

0:09:47.559 --> 0:09:49.200
<v Speaker 1>But right now I think we will be in this

0:09:49.320 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 1>fair way of it looks like for En, talk to

0:09:54.280 --> 0:09:56.839
<v Speaker 1>me about the integration of the b HP assets. What

0:09:56.880 --> 0:09:59.200
<v Speaker 1>are you learning there, especially about the the U S

0:09:59.200 --> 0:10:03.120
<v Speaker 1>shail market. But so b HPS a great company, great assets,

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:05.440
<v Speaker 1>great people. We only took over the operations on the

0:10:05.440 --> 0:10:08.400
<v Speaker 1>first of March after the closing, so we're really early

0:10:08.440 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 1>into it. We've got, you know, synergies that that will happen.

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 1>They will happen very fast. We like the assets a lot.

0:10:15.800 --> 0:10:18.160
<v Speaker 1>We're part of that checkerboarding and the in the Permian

0:10:18.480 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 1>you've ever seen the old historical reason why UH leases

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:24.959
<v Speaker 1>are are actually shaped like a checkerboard. And so we've

0:10:25.000 --> 0:10:27.439
<v Speaker 1>got people in between us. I think down the road

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:30.040
<v Speaker 1>they'll likely be some consolidation or swapping to make that

0:10:30.080 --> 0:10:32.400
<v Speaker 1>a little bit more efficient. But we like the rocks.

0:10:32.600 --> 0:10:34.840
<v Speaker 1>UH We've got a great team that's been working on

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:36.880
<v Speaker 1>natural gas in the US and now they can turn

0:10:36.920 --> 0:10:40.000
<v Speaker 1>themselves to crude out which would be great. And does

0:10:40.040 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 1>that consolidation come sooner rather than later? Is that something

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:46.040
<v Speaker 1>we see in the near term, like this year, next year?

0:10:46.080 --> 0:10:48.080
<v Speaker 1>When when might that happen? It's a good question. I

0:10:48.120 --> 0:10:50.959
<v Speaker 1>think there's no need to rush it. I think it's

0:10:51.000 --> 0:10:53.120
<v Speaker 1>just one of those things if you look at that

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:55.480
<v Speaker 1>big piece of geography out there, not just for us,

0:10:55.600 --> 0:10:59.160
<v Speaker 1>that there will be rationaliz station right coming on. So

0:10:59.320 --> 0:11:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Compere you think will be competitive is as you try

0:11:01.760 --> 0:11:04.600
<v Speaker 1>and sort of figure out who's gonna get the upper hand. Well,

0:11:04.640 --> 0:11:06.720
<v Speaker 1>I think I think it'll you know, you could have

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:10.360
<v Speaker 1>the industrial logic of companies just rationalized. You can do swaps.

0:11:10.400 --> 0:11:12.320
<v Speaker 1>It doesn't even have to be and I can see

0:11:12.320 --> 0:11:14.800
<v Speaker 1>that some people would see pairents of companies will see

0:11:14.800 --> 0:11:17.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot of value in that. And for us, it's

0:11:17.280 --> 0:11:19.880
<v Speaker 1>also what we did with HP with some other assets

0:11:19.920 --> 0:11:22.200
<v Speaker 1>in the Eagle for in the Haynesville right next to

0:11:22.240 --> 0:11:24.960
<v Speaker 1>where we were already producing gas. So it's a really

0:11:25.040 --> 0:11:27.960
<v Speaker 1>nice extra piece of business for BP. And you'll see

0:11:28.000 --> 0:11:30.280
<v Speaker 1>us divesting some of the gas assets that we had

0:11:30.679 --> 0:11:33.679
<v Speaker 1>to make sure we we returned to shareholders. Seeing the

0:11:33.720 --> 0:11:35.920
<v Speaker 1>money that we put out, well, you anticipated my next

0:11:36.000 --> 0:11:39.199
<v Speaker 1>question not surprisingly those divestments, especially here in the US.

0:11:39.440 --> 0:11:42.080
<v Speaker 1>How's that going? Is it the pace you want? What

0:11:42.120 --> 0:11:45.360
<v Speaker 1>happens next? So again no rush where we've had data open,

0:11:45.600 --> 0:11:48.160
<v Speaker 1>data rooms open now this year for a number of

0:11:48.200 --> 0:11:50.840
<v Speaker 1>months now, and I can just say I'm very surprised

0:11:50.840 --> 0:11:53.199
<v Speaker 1>that the number of companies and the interests are going

0:11:53.240 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 1>through and kicking the tires and looking at the assets

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:58.280
<v Speaker 1>and the data. So I think it bodes well for

0:11:58.720 --> 0:12:02.000
<v Speaker 1>UM whenever we decide and and what what do you

0:12:02.040 --> 0:12:05.439
<v Speaker 1>owe that surprise too, and where is the interest coming from?

0:12:05.480 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Help us understand that it's a real wide variety of

0:12:07.760 --> 0:12:10.640
<v Speaker 1>interest in the buying buying set. It's companies we know,

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:13.679
<v Speaker 1>some of the bigger companies, it's uh, some of the

0:12:13.720 --> 0:12:18.560
<v Speaker 1>independence that we know. And then there's individuals essentially individuals

0:12:18.600 --> 0:12:21.400
<v Speaker 1>who have a lot of backing of cash, so private equity,

0:12:21.440 --> 0:12:24.960
<v Speaker 1>maybe small private equity, So it's the whole spectrum. I

0:12:25.000 --> 0:12:27.280
<v Speaker 1>do wonder about the world at private equity place here

0:12:27.280 --> 0:12:30.319
<v Speaker 1>because it feels like as an industry they've sort of

0:12:30.360 --> 0:12:33.120
<v Speaker 1>been in and out of of the oil business, they

0:12:33.240 --> 0:12:36.760
<v Speaker 1>the energy business. How do you see them both competitively

0:12:36.880 --> 0:12:39.240
<v Speaker 1>and as a partner at this point, Well, we see

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:41.400
<v Speaker 1>them so not only here in the U s. We

0:12:41.400 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 1>we see private equity has moved into the North Sea,

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:47.199
<v Speaker 1>the northern southern North Sea. In some cases they are

0:12:47.240 --> 0:12:50.319
<v Speaker 1>buying established operators. In other cases they buy a percentage

0:12:50.320 --> 0:12:52.880
<v Speaker 1>and our partners. So we've got some very good private

0:12:52.880 --> 0:12:55.760
<v Speaker 1>equity partners in the North Sea here in the US.

0:12:55.920 --> 0:12:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I think it's I think it sort of goes up

0:12:57.760 --> 0:13:00.360
<v Speaker 1>and down a little bit with their sources of money,

0:13:00.440 --> 0:13:03.760
<v Speaker 1>and when it's tight, it's less and when money is easier.

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 1>You see more of it, and it feels to be

0:13:05.520 --> 0:13:09.520
<v Speaker 1>easier now. So Mr Buffett plays into the broader conversation

0:13:09.640 --> 0:13:13.000
<v Speaker 1>with his investment there with Anti Darca. Does that change

0:13:13.000 --> 0:13:15.600
<v Speaker 1>your strategy or does it change the landscape? Well, it

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:18.839
<v Speaker 1>doesn't change our strategy. I think I was surprised because

0:13:19.480 --> 0:13:22.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, a number of years ago Mr Buffett wasn't

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:25.600
<v Speaker 1>particularly interested in in energy. It shows that he is,

0:13:25.679 --> 0:13:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and I think that it's going to show the the

0:13:27.600 --> 0:13:30.480
<v Speaker 1>energy engine of the US has really growing and support

0:13:30.520 --> 0:13:34.000
<v Speaker 1>for that. Um he stepped in to help Occidental, which

0:13:34.040 --> 0:13:37.040
<v Speaker 1>is a great company. The indoor. Our antidarchical assets are

0:13:37.080 --> 0:13:40.200
<v Speaker 1>really good, whether it's ro Occidental or Chevron's really good.

0:13:40.200 --> 0:13:43.280
<v Speaker 1>So it really doesn't surprise me this competition, right, it's

0:13:43.320 --> 0:13:45.360
<v Speaker 1>great to catch up. The biggest thing just a couple

0:13:45.360 --> 0:13:49.240
<v Speaker 1>of seconds left. You learn from hanging out here at Milkin. Well,

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:51.320
<v Speaker 1>this is a very different conference than the other ones

0:13:51.360 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 1>you've got. We have investors from all around the West

0:13:54.000 --> 0:13:56.720
<v Speaker 1>Coast and i'd say the Pacific rim. So for us,

0:13:56.760 --> 0:13:59.560
<v Speaker 1>it's a chance to not only talk to partners existing

0:13:59.600 --> 0:14:03.080
<v Speaker 1>sharehold there's possibly new shareholders and it's got a very

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:07.120
<v Speaker 1>broad of agreement of subjects here, from health to uh

0:14:07.160 --> 0:14:09.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, the new technologies. I've enjoined it. That's VP

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 1>CEO Bob Dudley and of course one of the most

0:14:13.160 --> 0:14:17.120
<v Speaker 1>followed names in terms of how the oil market is going,

0:14:17.240 --> 0:14:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and it tells us so much about the global economy.

0:14:20.720 --> 0:14:23.480
<v Speaker 1>Investment in politics, Well, if you're at Milkin, you're in

0:14:23.640 --> 0:14:25.920
<v Speaker 1>l A. Makes sense to stop in and talk to

0:14:26.080 --> 0:14:28.880
<v Speaker 1>the mayor of that city, Eric Garcetti. You know, he

0:14:28.920 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 1>thought about running for president, very well known politician, not

0:14:32.760 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 1>just there in l A, but around the globe. It

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:36.720
<v Speaker 1>was great to talk to Mayor Garcetti because, Jason, when

0:14:36.720 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 1>I think about Los Angeles, I do think about them

0:14:38.640 --> 0:14:41.400
<v Speaker 1>being at the crossroads of so many important issues, whether

0:14:41.400 --> 0:14:44.920
<v Speaker 1>it's infrastructure, whether it's immigration, whether it's politics, whether it's

0:14:44.920 --> 0:14:47.800
<v Speaker 1>food production, and a lot going on in this city.

0:14:47.840 --> 0:14:50.040
<v Speaker 1>And we began by talking with him about a Green

0:14:50.120 --> 0:14:52.640
<v Speaker 1>New Deal for Los Angeles. He talked about what he

0:14:52.640 --> 0:14:55.360
<v Speaker 1>had planned. You've got a big announcement, a green new Deal.

0:14:55.400 --> 0:14:57.200
<v Speaker 1>We talked about at a national level, You've got a

0:14:57.200 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 1>plan for l A. Tell us about it. Well, my

0:14:58.920 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>simple message for in Washington is, while you're figuring it

0:15:02.000 --> 0:15:04.480
<v Speaker 1>out and looking across the aisle. Don't worry about looking

0:15:04.520 --> 0:15:06.640
<v Speaker 1>across the aisle, look across the country. And here in

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:08.760
<v Speaker 1>l A. Actually four and a half years ago we

0:15:08.840 --> 0:15:11.720
<v Speaker 1>launched a plan that was about the environment, the economy

0:15:11.800 --> 0:15:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and equity. And now people have talked about a green

0:15:14.240 --> 0:15:17.760
<v Speaker 1>New Deal, so we're updating it, making stretch goals huge

0:15:17.800 --> 0:15:23.040
<v Speaker 1>carbon neutral cities, carbon neutral buildings, trash free cities, recycling

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:27.120
<v Speaker 1>of our water, and zero carbon electric city grid. That

0:15:27.200 --> 0:15:28.960
<v Speaker 1>now is time and l A I think can be

0:15:29.000 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the place while creating jobs. So it's economy and environment together,

0:15:32.880 --> 0:15:34.320
<v Speaker 1>all right, So how do you do it? Like, what's

0:15:34.320 --> 0:15:36.880
<v Speaker 1>the first what's the first step? And how soon do

0:15:37.000 --> 0:15:38.920
<v Speaker 1>people really start to see results from this? Well, we

0:15:38.960 --> 0:15:41.160
<v Speaker 1>already held ourselves accountable a few years ago, so we

0:15:41.160 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 1>we reduced our carbon emissions in ten by eleven percent.

0:15:44.920 --> 0:15:46.960
<v Speaker 1>I'd be challenged to find a city almost anywhere in

0:15:46.960 --> 0:15:49.240
<v Speaker 1>the developed world that did that, and our unemployment went

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:52.920
<v Speaker 1>down fourteen percent that year. So it's conscious strategies for jobs.

0:15:52.960 --> 0:15:56.280
<v Speaker 1>So looking for those green sector energy job solar installation,

0:15:56.600 --> 0:16:00.280
<v Speaker 1>water technologies, and at the same time going straight to

0:16:00.360 --> 0:16:02.359
<v Speaker 1>things that I own as a mayor that we collectively

0:16:02.400 --> 0:16:05.200
<v Speaker 1>own and we run the largest municipal utility in the country,

0:16:05.200 --> 0:16:07.480
<v Speaker 1>and we're transferring that not just off of coal, but

0:16:07.560 --> 0:16:09.760
<v Speaker 1>now off of carbon itself. And then of course our

0:16:09.800 --> 0:16:13.520
<v Speaker 1>transportation system in our buildings. Those three things, electricity, transportation

0:16:13.560 --> 0:16:15.320
<v Speaker 1>and buildings account for about eight percent of all of

0:16:15.360 --> 0:16:18.480
<v Speaker 1>our omissions. So what pushback are you getting? Because Green

0:16:18.520 --> 0:16:23.240
<v Speaker 1>New Deal on a national level has drawn some maybe

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:27.080
<v Speaker 1>eye rolling, maybe some criticism, maybe some skepticism at the

0:16:27.160 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 1>very least, what are you encountering at the local level.

0:16:29.520 --> 0:16:31.000
<v Speaker 1>We don't really find that, and we want to put

0:16:31.040 --> 0:16:32.720
<v Speaker 1>this out not just for l A, but really is

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:35.160
<v Speaker 1>a green print for all cities in the country and

0:16:35.200 --> 0:16:37.840
<v Speaker 1>around the world. I chair Climate Mayors, which is four

0:16:38.520 --> 0:16:41.120
<v Speaker 1>two mayors bipartisan group around the country. And I don't

0:16:41.120 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 1>think we get caught up in those conversations because while

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:46.440
<v Speaker 1>people talking about universal incomes and things like that, we

0:16:46.480 --> 0:16:49.120
<v Speaker 1>know in l A we created thirty five thousand green jobs.

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:52.040
<v Speaker 1>That's more than the country lost in coal jobs. So

0:16:52.360 --> 0:16:56.040
<v Speaker 1>we know that we can create sectors in any city

0:16:56.080 --> 0:16:58.880
<v Speaker 1>around this um and that kind of answers that middle

0:16:58.880 --> 0:17:00.600
<v Speaker 1>class question of how do we have a place in

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:03.160
<v Speaker 1>the economy for our citizens in the future. It's by

0:17:03.160 --> 0:17:06.400
<v Speaker 1>embracing this stuff aggressively. Well, let's talk about that very topic,

0:17:06.480 --> 0:17:08.800
<v Speaker 1>because we think about a lot in New York, certainly

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:12.000
<v Speaker 1>all over the country, affordability just of of the big

0:17:12.000 --> 0:17:14.040
<v Speaker 1>City's got a lot of people who want to come

0:17:14.080 --> 0:17:17.120
<v Speaker 1>to a place like l A. You see it every day.

0:17:17.160 --> 0:17:19.560
<v Speaker 1>I see it, you know, flying in and driving through

0:17:20.000 --> 0:17:24.200
<v Speaker 1>uh Town yesterday. How do you ensure that this is

0:17:24.240 --> 0:17:27.520
<v Speaker 1>a place where people can actually make a good living

0:17:27.640 --> 0:17:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and live well, You have to find what those jobs are. So,

0:17:30.400 --> 0:17:32.760
<v Speaker 1>for instance, I know New York struggling struggling with keeping

0:17:32.840 --> 0:17:35.159
<v Speaker 1>up the subway and expanding it. We passed a measure

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:39.440
<v Speaker 1>that will never sunset to build fifteen new rapid transit lines,

0:17:40.000 --> 0:17:42.119
<v Speaker 1>and we make sure those jobs go here locally. That's

0:17:42.119 --> 0:17:45.399
<v Speaker 1>seven seven thousand jobs. You can't export their middle class,

0:17:45.400 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 1>and you can keep them for an entire career, your lifetime.

0:17:48.040 --> 0:17:50.480
<v Speaker 1>So I think it's thinking intelligently about these things, not

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:52.960
<v Speaker 1>just buying a little bit of solar power on the

0:17:53.000 --> 0:17:56.480
<v Speaker 1>marketplace or recycling a little bit more, but really building

0:17:56.520 --> 0:17:58.320
<v Speaker 1>the economy around that. And that's what we're doing here

0:17:58.320 --> 0:18:00.720
<v Speaker 1>in l A and how do you it it into

0:18:01.000 --> 0:18:04.639
<v Speaker 1>the state schools? You've got a new governor. Um, you know,

0:18:05.040 --> 0:18:07.600
<v Speaker 1>you know pretty well. Um, you know he's had a

0:18:07.680 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 1>job similar to you, a little a little bit further

0:18:10.160 --> 0:18:14.320
<v Speaker 1>up state, smaller town, m But you know, how do

0:18:14.400 --> 0:18:16.240
<v Speaker 1>you what do you need from the state in order

0:18:16.280 --> 0:18:18.760
<v Speaker 1>to get this going into insured success. Well, I think

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:21.320
<v Speaker 1>cities often inspire the state policy. So we said we

0:18:21.320 --> 0:18:24.480
<v Speaker 1>were going to be renewable, and then the state passed that.

0:18:24.560 --> 0:18:27.480
<v Speaker 1>So that is now the goal for all of California.

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:30.920
<v Speaker 1>When we started becoming a solar city now we're number

0:18:30.960 --> 0:18:33.480
<v Speaker 1>one solar city in America, the states started to help

0:18:33.480 --> 0:18:37.560
<v Speaker 1>subsidize that electric cars, uh and electrifying our transportation system.

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:40.119
<v Speaker 1>So usually cities are the laboratories. States are then the

0:18:40.160 --> 0:18:42.200
<v Speaker 1>folks that can give it sort of volume. But a

0:18:42.280 --> 0:18:44.080
<v Speaker 1>city as big as l A is essentially the size

0:18:44.080 --> 0:18:45.760
<v Speaker 1>of a state, And so we hope to not just

0:18:45.800 --> 0:18:48.720
<v Speaker 1>inspire California, but the rest of the country too. And

0:18:49.480 --> 0:18:52.320
<v Speaker 1>what about traffic? Can we just talk about traffics. It's

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:54.400
<v Speaker 1>it's blowing right now, you're at that late traffic report,

0:18:54.440 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 1>but it happens to be midday. You know, you know

0:18:56.840 --> 0:19:00.760
<v Speaker 1>three things, One is technology. We have even peak traffic

0:19:00.760 --> 0:19:04.440
<v Speaker 1>in l A. Our streets don't have a car on them. Wow.

0:19:04.600 --> 0:19:08.520
<v Speaker 1>So as we have autonomous vehicles or interconnected vehicles, we

0:19:08.560 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 1>can much better use that space without having to double

0:19:11.280 --> 0:19:14.959
<v Speaker 1>deck freeways at billions of dollars in decades long. Second

0:19:15.000 --> 0:19:16.959
<v Speaker 1>is the public transportation system that I told you we're

0:19:16.960 --> 0:19:19.560
<v Speaker 1>building out. And third is going to be building better

0:19:19.600 --> 0:19:21.679
<v Speaker 1>communities l A. In the past, you didn't put the

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:23.480
<v Speaker 1>housing next to the jobs. You didn't put the retail

0:19:23.520 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 1>near the housing. You didn't, you know, go out and

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:29.320
<v Speaker 1>worry about hitting five neighborhoods in one afternoon. New York.

0:19:29.359 --> 0:19:31.720
<v Speaker 1>You don't look at crossing three boroughs just to go

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:34.360
<v Speaker 1>see a friend every day. So it's really about better

0:19:34.440 --> 0:19:37.959
<v Speaker 1>zoning and planning. And we're completely redoing the city, especially

0:19:37.960 --> 0:19:40.560
<v Speaker 1>around our transit corridors, to be more dense and to

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:43.879
<v Speaker 1>put those jobs, those healthcare needs, everything all close to

0:19:43.920 --> 0:19:46.840
<v Speaker 1>where you live. And that's Eric Garcetti, the mayor of

0:19:46.960 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles. You know, I got to see him in

0:19:48.600 --> 0:19:51.879
<v Speaker 1>action a couple of times during the conference, and man,

0:19:52.040 --> 0:19:55.480
<v Speaker 1>he is smooth. He commands a room. Very impressive guy.

0:19:55.600 --> 0:19:57.280
<v Speaker 1>And it's a city and it's really a state that

0:19:57.320 --> 0:19:59.320
<v Speaker 1>you always want to watch because of its size and

0:19:59.320 --> 0:20:01.720
<v Speaker 1>its impact on the nation overall. So one of the

0:20:01.760 --> 0:20:03.920
<v Speaker 1>biggest names at milk in this year, no doubt about it,

0:20:04.040 --> 0:20:08.200
<v Speaker 1>Jason was Blackstone CEO Steve Schwartzman. Well Schwartzman well known,

0:20:08.320 --> 0:20:10.600
<v Speaker 1>his firm especially well known. They've eclipsed a half a

0:20:10.680 --> 0:20:14.399
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars in assets under management. It was great to

0:20:14.440 --> 0:20:16.359
<v Speaker 1>sit down with him. I've just seen a couple of

0:20:16.400 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 1>weeks earlier, actually on earnings day. But in this fast

0:20:19.800 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>moving world, Steve's always got something to talk about. And Jason,

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:25.719
<v Speaker 1>you started though with Blackstones conversion to a corporation. This

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:27.760
<v Speaker 1>was big news. We talked a couple of weeks ago

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:30.760
<v Speaker 1>about earnings and the big news that day was your

0:20:30.760 --> 0:20:34.399
<v Speaker 1>conversion to a corporation, which sounds a little wonky and

0:20:34.480 --> 0:20:37.600
<v Speaker 1>yet has been a really big deal for the stock,

0:20:37.720 --> 0:20:41.200
<v Speaker 1>not just yours, but the rest of the industry. Why well,

0:20:41.359 --> 0:20:44.520
<v Speaker 1>I think, uh, in terms of ours, it makes good

0:20:44.520 --> 0:20:48.560
<v Speaker 1>sense because they're probably two to three times the number

0:20:49.119 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 1>of people who could buy our stock who haven't been

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:56.399
<v Speaker 1>able to because we've been using K one statements. So

0:20:56.520 --> 0:20:59.080
<v Speaker 1>by getting rid of those and converting to the normal

0:20:59.160 --> 0:21:02.040
<v Speaker 1>ten nine did not mind. If we can take advantage

0:21:02.400 --> 0:21:07.200
<v Speaker 1>of that huge additional buying power, logic should say that

0:21:07.480 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 1>more people want to buy you, your stock will go up.

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:12.600
<v Speaker 1>And so what have people said to you in the Aftermathods?

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 1>As I said, it's been a couple of weeks. I mean,

0:21:14.280 --> 0:21:16.840
<v Speaker 1>are you hearing from a different class of investors? Is

0:21:16.880 --> 0:21:20.199
<v Speaker 1>your phone ringing from different people? Yes, it actually is,

0:21:20.400 --> 0:21:25.960
<v Speaker 1>And people say, thank goodness, you've made that decision. Uh,

0:21:26.119 --> 0:21:28.440
<v Speaker 1>we really want to own the stock. Can you come

0:21:28.480 --> 0:21:33.760
<v Speaker 1>and see us? Are stocks up? Uh in the last

0:21:33.840 --> 0:21:37.240
<v Speaker 1>week and a half since since I actually saw you.

0:21:37.720 --> 0:21:40.720
<v Speaker 1>So you have a certain magic. I should come on

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:46.520
<v Speaker 1>frequently anytime. And the other firms have gone up as well,

0:21:46.600 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 1>not the same amount obviously, but I think it's uh

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:53.200
<v Speaker 1>the market looking and saying if that work for Blackstone,

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:57.280
<v Speaker 1>then probably the other firms will follow, all right. So

0:21:57.440 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 1>that's sort of the retail side of business to to

0:21:59.480 --> 0:22:02.960
<v Speaker 1>some ex stent and some institutions. What about your limited partners,

0:22:03.000 --> 0:22:06.080
<v Speaker 1>the pensions, the sovereign wealth funds, the endowments. You talk

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:07.439
<v Speaker 1>to them all the time. A lot of them are

0:22:07.480 --> 0:22:10.320
<v Speaker 1>here in Los Angeles for this conference, what's their biggest

0:22:10.359 --> 0:22:12.960
<v Speaker 1>concern right now? Well, I think the biggest concern are

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:18.080
<v Speaker 1>high prices uh and and that's a valid issue. But

0:22:18.240 --> 0:22:20.560
<v Speaker 1>the prices that you're going to have to pay for deals,

0:22:20.600 --> 0:22:24.000
<v Speaker 1>well that everyone is paying as the result of markets

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:28.080
<v Speaker 1>going up, uh and and so that that that's a concern.

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:34.440
<v Speaker 1>On the other hand, uh, the alternative class UH private equity,

0:22:34.520 --> 0:22:39.480
<v Speaker 1>real estate uh and and you know credit uh has

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:43.920
<v Speaker 1>done so well for these investors over very long periods

0:22:43.920 --> 0:22:49.600
<v Speaker 1>of time that they're continue to increase their allocations. And

0:22:49.920 --> 0:22:53.640
<v Speaker 1>that's that's certainly good news for us. But but it's

0:22:53.640 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 1>a time where you need a little more caution for

0:22:57.680 --> 0:23:02.440
<v Speaker 1>investing than than when when prices are lower. And so

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:04.840
<v Speaker 1>as you look across the suite of products that you're

0:23:04.880 --> 0:23:07.719
<v Speaker 1>offering to investors, whether it's real estate, credit, head funds,

0:23:07.920 --> 0:23:10.760
<v Speaker 1>private equity, is there one that seems to be drawing

0:23:11.160 --> 0:23:14.359
<v Speaker 1>a disproportionate or a little bit more attention from the

0:23:14.359 --> 0:23:17.280
<v Speaker 1>big institutions. Right now, I'm asking you to choose among

0:23:17.280 --> 0:23:19.679
<v Speaker 1>your children. I know, well that's a tough one. You know,

0:23:19.840 --> 0:23:22.919
<v Speaker 1>we love all our children, uh and all the funds

0:23:22.920 --> 0:23:26.560
<v Speaker 1>sell out. So the bottom line is that we've had

0:23:26.960 --> 0:23:32.720
<v Speaker 1>a huge demand. Uh, partly because we've done so well

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:36.919
<v Speaker 1>for investors in every one of the classes, and the

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:41.600
<v Speaker 1>investors themselves have more money, if you will, when when

0:23:41.760 --> 0:23:44.359
<v Speaker 1>markets go up, the size of their funds are bigger.

0:23:45.000 --> 0:23:52.199
<v Speaker 1>So I think they're biasing things to experience managers in

0:23:52.280 --> 0:23:57.639
<v Speaker 1>a higher price environment, to to basically protect capital and

0:23:57.760 --> 0:24:00.760
<v Speaker 1>do the right thing. But also I had this cycle

0:24:01.160 --> 0:24:03.680
<v Speaker 1>and be able to put money in at the right time.

0:24:04.080 --> 0:24:06.640
<v Speaker 1>So when you think about that appetite for all these

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:09.040
<v Speaker 1>funds they're selling out. You've talked about getting to a

0:24:09.040 --> 0:24:11.920
<v Speaker 1>trillion dollars in just a few years, and assets under management,

0:24:11.960 --> 0:24:15.000
<v Speaker 1>you're more than halfway there at this point. How much

0:24:15.040 --> 0:24:17.439
<v Speaker 1>do you worry about getting too big, that there's too

0:24:17.520 --> 0:24:19.200
<v Speaker 1>much money that you have to put to work? Well,

0:24:19.200 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 1>you always worry about things like that, And the nice

0:24:22.040 --> 0:24:24.520
<v Speaker 1>thing is you can do something about it that this

0:24:24.680 --> 0:24:29.280
<v Speaker 1>isn't mandated yet. Uh. And you don't want money that

0:24:29.440 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 1>you can invest. Well, our business has gone from no

0:24:34.440 --> 0:24:37.200
<v Speaker 1>assets to the largest in the world, uh in our

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:42.920
<v Speaker 1>asset class at five and twelve billion dollars. Because we're careful,

0:24:43.760 --> 0:24:47.800
<v Speaker 1>because we're prudent, because we understand we're playing a long game.

0:24:48.400 --> 0:24:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Uh And if we do poorly, uh, the only people

0:24:52.240 --> 0:24:56.760
<v Speaker 1>who remember that is everyone who gave us money. And

0:24:56.800 --> 0:24:59.040
<v Speaker 1>so we only want them to have a good ride.

0:24:59.520 --> 0:25:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Uh And and so it's up to us not to

0:25:03.040 --> 0:25:06.200
<v Speaker 1>have too much money in any strategy. What we tend

0:25:06.240 --> 0:25:12.280
<v Speaker 1>to do, Jason, is expand not by making one fund gargantuan.

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:18.560
<v Speaker 1>We do it by inventing other strategies or going into

0:25:18.600 --> 0:25:22.080
<v Speaker 1>areas we haven't where we think the investments are very good.

0:25:22.119 --> 0:25:27.240
<v Speaker 1>So we're looking at growth buyouts now a growth investing

0:25:27.800 --> 0:25:31.560
<v Speaker 1>uh inequity. We think that's going to be very good.

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:34.840
<v Speaker 1>So you'll raise a separate fund for that. This separate

0:25:34.840 --> 0:25:39.359
<v Speaker 1>fund for that. We're also um expanding in life sciences.

0:25:40.240 --> 0:25:43.800
<v Speaker 1>We think that that's a very interesting area with a

0:25:43.960 --> 0:25:50.320
<v Speaker 1>very technical, technically intensive group we we purchased named Claris

0:25:50.359 --> 0:25:53.960
<v Speaker 1>that does third stage trials invest in that area and

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:57.600
<v Speaker 1>actually does the trials for large pharma. So so what

0:25:57.760 --> 0:26:01.160
<v Speaker 1>you do is you find something that isn't as correlated

0:26:01.720 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 1>um that in the growth growth equity area. You know,

0:26:06.320 --> 0:26:11.600
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't particularly use leverage where you're buying mature companies

0:26:11.640 --> 0:26:15.359
<v Speaker 1>in the in the tech area compared to the early

0:26:15.520 --> 0:26:19.320
<v Speaker 1>stage things and so as you look around the world,

0:26:19.440 --> 0:26:22.640
<v Speaker 1>one thing that's certainly in people's mind right now is Europe, uh,

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:26.800
<v Speaker 1>specifically Germany, specifically the banking sector there. What do you

0:26:26.880 --> 0:26:28.320
<v Speaker 1>think is going to have you spent a lot of

0:26:28.359 --> 0:26:31.359
<v Speaker 1>time in that part of the world. Deutsche Bank, friend

0:26:31.359 --> 0:26:35.119
<v Speaker 1>of mine? Where does this movie end? Well? The movie

0:26:35.200 --> 0:26:37.639
<v Speaker 1>for Germany is a pretty good movie. It's been a

0:26:37.640 --> 0:26:41.560
<v Speaker 1>good movie, uh since the nineteen fifties. Uh. And and

0:26:41.600 --> 0:26:46.960
<v Speaker 1>they grow slowly, they're they're they're the largest country in Europe. Uh.

0:26:48.040 --> 0:26:52.119
<v Speaker 1>The financial sector in Germany has always been uh uh

0:26:52.520 --> 0:26:56.120
<v Speaker 1>some somewhat different than in other parts of the world. Uh.

0:26:56.359 --> 0:26:59.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, they have a lot of smaller regional banks. Uh.

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:05.080
<v Speaker 1>And they've had not great luck considering how good their

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:10.840
<v Speaker 1>economy is that their banking sector hasn't hasn't performed as well.

0:27:11.240 --> 0:27:15.439
<v Speaker 1>And right now, you know, Deutsche Bank has been in

0:27:15.520 --> 0:27:21.600
<v Speaker 1>the spotlight for the last few years in terms of performance.

0:27:21.640 --> 0:27:25.040
<v Speaker 1>And it's tough to manage a bank when everybody's looking

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:32.159
<v Speaker 1>at it and everybody's uh raising questions. Um, Germany needs

0:27:32.200 --> 0:27:38.000
<v Speaker 1>a national champion. Every every European country believes that they

0:27:38.080 --> 0:27:45.120
<v Speaker 1>need significant credit extender. And so do you think it's

0:27:45.119 --> 0:27:48.200
<v Speaker 1>a public solution or a private sector solution that ultimately

0:27:48.720 --> 0:27:53.440
<v Speaker 1>helps save Deutsche Bank. I'm not a Deutsche Bank expert.

0:27:53.640 --> 0:27:57.200
<v Speaker 1>I wish I were. I say, you're not going in there.

0:27:57.240 --> 0:27:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I I We're not going in. It's hard to do

0:27:59.359 --> 0:28:02.440
<v Speaker 1>due diligent, so in a bank. What's your one big

0:28:02.480 --> 0:28:05.800
<v Speaker 1>takeaway from China right now? You've invested there, You've done

0:28:05.800 --> 0:28:08.199
<v Speaker 1>a lot of philanthropy there. What's the thing people are

0:28:08.240 --> 0:28:12.240
<v Speaker 1>missing about China? Well, China has stimulated its economy like

0:28:12.280 --> 0:28:15.720
<v Speaker 1>they said they would when the tariffs went in. I

0:28:15.840 --> 0:28:19.840
<v Speaker 1>was there four weeks ago. The people at the Central

0:28:19.840 --> 0:28:23.439
<v Speaker 1>Bank we're telling me that worked very nicely, and and

0:28:23.480 --> 0:28:26.960
<v Speaker 1>now you're seeing the results of that, which is surprised

0:28:27.720 --> 0:28:32.840
<v Speaker 1>some commentators that the China's economy looks pretty solid now

0:28:33.480 --> 0:28:37.640
<v Speaker 1>in the sixes uh six percent grows and I think

0:28:37.680 --> 0:28:41.400
<v Speaker 1>that would have surprised some other people, didn't particularly surprise me.

0:28:41.560 --> 0:28:46.440
<v Speaker 1>They have the ability in China to really force money

0:28:47.200 --> 0:28:51.000
<v Speaker 1>into their system uh to to to create growth, and

0:28:51.400 --> 0:28:54.680
<v Speaker 1>they're they're doing it and it's been successful. And are

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:58.760
<v Speaker 1>you putting more money into China at this point as Blackstone?

0:28:58.880 --> 0:29:02.160
<v Speaker 1>Are you investing more fully? And where we just bought

0:29:02.160 --> 0:29:05.560
<v Speaker 1>a company there. Um, I think I think China is

0:29:05.600 --> 0:29:11.640
<v Speaker 1>a harder place to invest for outsiders. Uh. And you

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:16.160
<v Speaker 1>always have to be prudent and thoughtful when you invest.

0:29:16.600 --> 0:29:20.600
<v Speaker 1>We're looking in the real estate area as well. Uh.

0:29:20.640 --> 0:29:24.240
<v Speaker 1>And it all depends you know what happens and what

0:29:24.480 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 1>values are right. Uh. Tim Guitner over the weekend was

0:29:27.840 --> 0:29:31.000
<v Speaker 1>talking about the strength of the economy and this bull

0:29:31.080 --> 0:29:33.080
<v Speaker 1>market that we've been in for a long time, and

0:29:33.080 --> 0:29:35.000
<v Speaker 1>he said, the only thing we have to avoid is

0:29:35.080 --> 0:29:38.560
<v Speaker 1>dumb mistakes. Of course. Uh, what could be a dumb

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:41.440
<v Speaker 1>mistake that we collectively could make, either from a policy

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:46.239
<v Speaker 1>decision or from a market decision. Well, I think there

0:29:46.240 --> 0:29:48.600
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of mistakes you can always make. I

0:29:48.640 --> 0:29:53.320
<v Speaker 1>think if if there's a really dramatic change in the

0:29:53.600 --> 0:29:58.640
<v Speaker 1>tax area, Um, if the if the Democrats win, for example,

0:29:58.680 --> 0:30:01.920
<v Speaker 1>if if lot of the things that some of their

0:30:01.960 --> 0:30:05.040
<v Speaker 1>candidates are talking about, I think that would be sort

0:30:05.080 --> 0:30:11.480
<v Speaker 1>of a disincentive, could have a certain psychological shock value. Uh.

0:30:11.520 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 1>And and logic would say that would would slow an economy. Um,

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:19.400
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the things you could do. That's Blackstone

0:30:19.480 --> 0:30:22.000
<v Speaker 1>CEO Steve Schwartzman. You always want to talk to him.

0:30:22.000 --> 0:30:23.959
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Jason, you have a great relationship with him.

0:30:24.160 --> 0:30:26.840
<v Speaker 1>But again, when you think about Blackstone, the amount of

0:30:26.880 --> 0:30:29.760
<v Speaker 1>money that they are managing, this is a big deal

0:30:29.840 --> 0:30:32.800
<v Speaker 1>when it comes to the global financial industry. Well, and

0:30:32.840 --> 0:30:35.480
<v Speaker 1>it's interesting too because of the nature of their businesses.

0:30:35.480 --> 0:30:37.560
<v Speaker 1>They invest so heavily in real estate and credit, in

0:30:37.600 --> 0:30:40.200
<v Speaker 1>hedge funds, and of course in private equity, so they

0:30:40.240 --> 0:30:41.959
<v Speaker 1>have a window into the economy that if you have

0:30:42.080 --> 0:30:44.120
<v Speaker 1>and I love that they say, we have said private

0:30:44.120 --> 0:30:46.120
<v Speaker 1>equity is kind of the new hedge fund, right. I

0:30:46.120 --> 0:30:48.880
<v Speaker 1>spoke with Walter rob He's the former Whole Foods co CEO.

0:30:49.080 --> 0:30:51.440
<v Speaker 1>It was such a great conversation. You know him, well,

0:30:51.480 --> 0:30:54.640
<v Speaker 1>you talk cannabis, the meal kit business, and of course

0:30:54.720 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 1>his former company. I gotta talk to you about Whole Foods.

0:30:57.520 --> 0:31:00.320
<v Speaker 1>A couple of years since has been sold from that.

0:31:00.400 --> 0:31:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Amazon bought it app has a plate out. How you thought,

0:31:03.560 --> 0:31:06.160
<v Speaker 1>has it been a good combination? Yeah? I think yes.

0:31:06.240 --> 0:31:08.800
<v Speaker 1>I think on balance, yes, I think look at the

0:31:08.960 --> 0:31:12.320
<v Speaker 1>large theme of digitizing whole folds, on taking the physical

0:31:12.360 --> 0:31:14.520
<v Speaker 1>offer that we developed over forty years and bringing in

0:31:14.520 --> 0:31:16.840
<v Speaker 1>into the digital sphere. I think the combination of the

0:31:16.880 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 1>two strengths of the two companies has realized for the

0:31:19.840 --> 0:31:22.240
<v Speaker 1>joining with Prime now and I think, you know, any

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:26.000
<v Speaker 1>cultural combination takes time to really settle in values, you know,

0:31:26.040 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 1>those sorts of things have to join together. But on

0:31:28.320 --> 0:31:31.120
<v Speaker 1>balance in the marketplace, I think the hopefuls continue to

0:31:31.160 --> 0:31:33.680
<v Speaker 1>come forward through through the partnership with Amazon. You know,

0:31:33.720 --> 0:31:35.160
<v Speaker 1>I think about when you and I spent some time

0:31:35.160 --> 0:31:37.040
<v Speaker 1>in Detroit when hopefully It's opening in Detroit and a

0:31:37.040 --> 0:31:38.880
<v Speaker 1>lot of people were like, it wasn't gonna work. This

0:31:39.000 --> 0:31:42.160
<v Speaker 1>was an odd market. You folks really are Hopefully it's

0:31:42.200 --> 0:31:45.719
<v Speaker 1>really embraced the citizens there at the culture there, and

0:31:45.760 --> 0:31:50.320
<v Speaker 1>it's still working. Correct. It's just celebrating celebrated six anniversary

0:31:50.320 --> 0:31:52.960
<v Speaker 1>in June, and so it's just I mean, it's a

0:31:53.320 --> 0:31:55.600
<v Speaker 1>it was my proudest moment as a grocer June thirteen,

0:31:55.680 --> 0:31:57.959
<v Speaker 1>two thousand and thirteen, and was one that store opened

0:31:58.000 --> 0:32:01.000
<v Speaker 1>and uh, and you were there, So I think but

0:32:01.040 --> 0:32:03.320
<v Speaker 1>it points to kind of this larger concern that as

0:32:03.360 --> 0:32:05.360
<v Speaker 1>part of what's being discussed here at Milkin, which is

0:32:05.400 --> 0:32:09.160
<v Speaker 1>the tremendous disparities in the air. Food access is one area,

0:32:09.200 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 1>but there's over six thousand communities in America that don't

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:14.880
<v Speaker 1>have access to fresh, healthy food like we enjoy. And

0:32:14.920 --> 0:32:17.360
<v Speaker 1>I think what Detroit was an attempt to do with

0:32:17.440 --> 0:32:20.800
<v Speaker 1>since area, that community deserves those same set of choices.

0:32:20.840 --> 0:32:22.880
<v Speaker 1>And so we're six years on and here we are.

0:32:23.120 --> 0:32:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Can we bring organics to the mass market in a

0:32:26.960 --> 0:32:30.280
<v Speaker 1>in a cost efficient way that is really accessible to everybody? Well,

0:32:30.360 --> 0:32:32.320
<v Speaker 1>isn't that? That's the great question is whether that can

0:32:32.360 --> 0:32:35.719
<v Speaker 1>actually happen. So we've come that the pricing, the availability

0:32:35.720 --> 0:32:38.120
<v Speaker 1>has increased tremendously over the last number of years. I

0:32:38.120 --> 0:32:40.240
<v Speaker 1>think it's going to take more years to do that,

0:32:40.520 --> 0:32:43.320
<v Speaker 1>but I think more sustainable food choices in general, not

0:32:43.400 --> 0:32:46.720
<v Speaker 1>just organics, have accelerated big time in you the marketplace,

0:32:46.800 --> 0:32:49.360
<v Speaker 1>So I think we'll get there. I want to ask

0:32:49.400 --> 0:32:51.240
<v Speaker 1>you that because your new company, you're investing in a

0:32:51.280 --> 0:32:53.560
<v Speaker 1>lot of organic companies. You've also invested in a mel

0:32:53.640 --> 0:32:56.280
<v Speaker 1>Kick company. However, we know it's Blue Apron. It's not

0:32:56.320 --> 0:32:58.480
<v Speaker 1>an easy business. What do you think the future is

0:32:58.480 --> 0:33:04.080
<v Speaker 1>of mil kick companies? I think it's part of meditated market. Well,

0:33:04.080 --> 0:33:05.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm not actually an investor in Blue Apron, but I'm

0:33:06.000 --> 0:33:08.200
<v Speaker 1>not I'm investor in a number of other small food

0:33:08.200 --> 0:33:10.680
<v Speaker 1>companies I think represent the next generation of food. But

0:33:10.720 --> 0:33:13.480
<v Speaker 1>I think for food meal kit companies, they are one

0:33:13.840 --> 0:33:16.800
<v Speaker 1>choice in a litany of choices customers now have they

0:33:16.840 --> 0:33:19.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't have five years ago. So we're seeing some limits

0:33:19.680 --> 0:33:21.920
<v Speaker 1>on that in terms of a the number of times

0:33:21.920 --> 0:33:25.840
<v Speaker 1>people repeat, the churn rate, et cetera, the concern about packaging.

0:33:26.160 --> 0:33:28.840
<v Speaker 1>But where we combine the meal kit with a physical store,

0:33:28.840 --> 0:33:31.600
<v Speaker 1>in the case they plated joined with Albertson's or Whole

0:33:31.640 --> 0:33:33.920
<v Speaker 1>Foods is doing meal kits with Amazon, I think they're

0:33:33.920 --> 0:33:37.480
<v Speaker 1>the combination is more powerful. I'm also curious about the

0:33:37.560 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 1>cannabis industry, about UM and I believe you're on the

0:33:41.600 --> 0:33:44.280
<v Speaker 1>board of one of the cannabis companies UM. That too,

0:33:44.320 --> 0:33:46.720
<v Speaker 1>has been a bit of a volatile industry. Do you

0:33:46.800 --> 0:33:50.080
<v Speaker 1>see a time Walter where there are cannabis products in

0:33:50.440 --> 0:33:54.400
<v Speaker 1>all supermarkets? You know, there's a phaze of cannabis growth

0:33:54.520 --> 0:33:57.240
<v Speaker 1>right now everywhere. I mean it's CBD everywhere, CBD everything,

0:33:57.360 --> 0:33:59.720
<v Speaker 1>So you know, look, I think it's it's at least

0:33:59.720 --> 0:34:01.760
<v Speaker 1>five years the United States before this thing kind of

0:34:01.800 --> 0:34:04.120
<v Speaker 1>lines up to where the banking system can get involved

0:34:04.120 --> 0:34:06.520
<v Speaker 1>and it can really go into m but I think

0:34:06.720 --> 0:34:08.960
<v Speaker 1>there's some people in my natural food business that say,

0:34:08.960 --> 0:34:11.120
<v Speaker 1>do they think it's bigger than natural foods. It's in

0:34:11.160 --> 0:34:13.759
<v Speaker 1>the early innings, so you know, there's a lot to

0:34:13.840 --> 0:34:17.120
<v Speaker 1>recommend cannabis as a medical plan and its properties yet

0:34:17.160 --> 0:34:19.759
<v Speaker 1>to be discovered and I think communicated. So I think

0:34:19.760 --> 0:34:22.359
<v Speaker 1>there's real, real potential here. Again, you have the same

0:34:22.440 --> 0:34:26.439
<v Speaker 1>questions around quality and standards. It's kind of mixed right now.

0:34:26.719 --> 0:34:28.520
<v Speaker 1>Is that necessary? I mean, I think that's where we

0:34:28.560 --> 0:34:31.120
<v Speaker 1>think about government are vegean until we get that. Is

0:34:31.160 --> 0:34:33.759
<v Speaker 1>it hard for to scale up? I think I think

0:34:33.760 --> 0:34:35.839
<v Speaker 1>it's necessary to really hit the scale. I think there's

0:34:35.840 --> 0:34:38.120
<v Speaker 1>just a lot of money. And this is global, by

0:34:38.120 --> 0:34:40.320
<v Speaker 1>the way, it's not just Canada, United States. It's global,

0:34:40.680 --> 0:34:43.080
<v Speaker 1>so licenses are being done in different countries. But I

0:34:43.080 --> 0:34:45.640
<v Speaker 1>think some sort of stakes in the ground around standards

0:34:45.719 --> 0:34:48.560
<v Speaker 1>and quality for the customer to offinately say we're going

0:34:48.600 --> 0:34:50.759
<v Speaker 1>to go all the way with this. I think it's

0:34:50.800 --> 0:34:54.279
<v Speaker 1>necessary we do invest in cadabiscopy. Yes I would, I would,

0:34:54.719 --> 0:34:56.319
<v Speaker 1>and I thought about that a lot before I would

0:34:56.320 --> 0:34:58.719
<v Speaker 1>answer that question. But you know, actually I've done the

0:34:58.800 --> 0:35:00.879
<v Speaker 1>look into the science of animous went to the plan.

0:35:01.400 --> 0:35:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I understand all the more rays around it, but I

0:35:03.520 --> 0:35:06.160
<v Speaker 1>think that here's something really healing about parts of this.

0:35:06.280 --> 0:35:08.880
<v Speaker 1>And my dad now is ninety two years old and

0:35:08.920 --> 0:35:11.480
<v Speaker 1>he's taken cannabis gummies at night to help him sleep,

0:35:11.520 --> 0:35:14.120
<v Speaker 1>and it's helping him. So when I see things like that,

0:35:14.239 --> 0:35:16.239
<v Speaker 1>I say, all right with the real let's let's get

0:35:16.280 --> 0:35:17.680
<v Speaker 1>the real part of it. But I think there's still

0:35:17.760 --> 0:35:19.759
<v Speaker 1>potential here. I got to ask you what the last question,

0:35:19.760 --> 0:35:21.600
<v Speaker 1>because I think we look at retail overall, but the

0:35:21.600 --> 0:35:24.560
<v Speaker 1>supermarket industry like where is it going? There's so many

0:35:24.600 --> 0:35:26.520
<v Speaker 1>that are seemed to be struggling, as you know, it's

0:35:26.520 --> 0:35:29.440
<v Speaker 1>a low margin business. Where do you ultimately see the

0:35:29.480 --> 0:35:32.800
<v Speaker 1>supermarket industry going? I have massive change. In other words,

0:35:32.880 --> 0:35:34.560
<v Speaker 1>I think the edge of it right now is with

0:35:34.640 --> 0:35:38.920
<v Speaker 1>Huma in China. It's a complete physical digital interaction in

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:41.839
<v Speaker 1>an integration in a fantastic way. But I think we're

0:35:41.840 --> 0:35:43.920
<v Speaker 1>going to see the future store is smaller, the senate

0:35:43.960 --> 0:35:49.799
<v Speaker 1>stores probably roboticized or made autonomous. The fresh product is exploding. Uh,

0:35:49.880 --> 0:35:52.360
<v Speaker 1>but you're gonna see this confluence of choices that the

0:35:52.440 --> 0:35:55.200
<v Speaker 1>customer today wants it in all sorts of different ways.

0:35:55.239 --> 0:35:57.920
<v Speaker 1>So I think the stores are there. Seventy of the

0:35:57.960 --> 0:36:00.480
<v Speaker 1>business five years from now still done in physical ours.

0:36:00.520 --> 0:36:03.000
<v Speaker 1>But the customer to day, particularly the lineal generation, wants

0:36:03.040 --> 0:36:05.960
<v Speaker 1>to connect digitally, wants to be met on a pickup

0:36:06.000 --> 0:36:08.359
<v Speaker 1>in all these different ways. So it's gonna look very

0:36:08.360 --> 0:36:11.320
<v Speaker 1>different than it looks today. That's former Whole Foods Market

0:36:11.400 --> 0:36:14.840
<v Speaker 1>co CEO Walter Robin. Really it's kind of interesting, you know,

0:36:14.840 --> 0:36:17.239
<v Speaker 1>he's been in the supermarket industry for so long, lots

0:36:17.239 --> 0:36:19.920
<v Speaker 1>of transformations, and right now, of course he's focusing on

0:36:20.000 --> 0:36:23.680
<v Speaker 1>investing in organic food companies. He thinks ultimately, Jason, it's

0:36:23.719 --> 0:36:25.760
<v Speaker 1>something we can bring to the masses. What a thoughtful

0:36:25.800 --> 0:36:30.520
<v Speaker 1>guy and a reminder and really a reminder that food

0:36:30.960 --> 0:36:34.000
<v Speaker 1>was front and center. So many conversations about that at

0:36:34.040 --> 0:36:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Milkin this year. It's really cool. So, Carol, while we

0:36:36.440 --> 0:36:38.560
<v Speaker 1>were out at Milkin, I caught up with a guy

0:36:38.600 --> 0:36:42.640
<v Speaker 1>who's been called the Warren Buffett of Canada. That's Brookfield's

0:36:42.680 --> 0:36:46.439
<v Speaker 1>Bruce Flat. A sprawling empire. They have a cross world

0:36:46.520 --> 0:36:48.839
<v Speaker 1>hundreds of billions of dollars, some very well known real

0:36:48.960 --> 0:36:51.480
<v Speaker 1>estate in the big name cities. Sprawling empire, so you

0:36:51.520 --> 0:36:54.399
<v Speaker 1>had to have a wide ranging conversation Jason from infrastructure

0:36:54.400 --> 0:36:57.200
<v Speaker 1>to Brookfield's acquisition of oak Tree. I started by asking

0:36:57.239 --> 0:36:59.799
<v Speaker 1>where we are in the economic cycle. Look, I would

0:37:00.080 --> 0:37:02.920
<v Speaker 1>from most of our businesses globally and in particular here

0:37:02.920 --> 0:37:06.759
<v Speaker 1>in the United States, everything feels pretty good. And uh

0:37:07.040 --> 0:37:08.839
<v Speaker 1>so there's no signs in front of us, so we're

0:37:08.880 --> 0:37:12.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna have a recession. But no one should forget that

0:37:12.200 --> 0:37:15.200
<v Speaker 1>we're ten years into an economic recovery and at some

0:37:15.280 --> 0:37:17.960
<v Speaker 1>point there will be a recession. And what do you

0:37:18.000 --> 0:37:20.080
<v Speaker 1>make of this idea that you know, maybe we're in

0:37:20.120 --> 0:37:22.160
<v Speaker 1>the midst of sort of a melt up. You know

0:37:22.280 --> 0:37:25.160
<v Speaker 1>that people are just don't have any reasons to be negative,

0:37:25.480 --> 0:37:28.359
<v Speaker 1>so they keep buying, and valuations go up, and they're

0:37:28.560 --> 0:37:31.799
<v Speaker 1>you know, trees are going So we buy real businesses.

0:37:32.000 --> 0:37:35.960
<v Speaker 1>We don't necessarily participate in the stock market, so I

0:37:36.000 --> 0:37:37.600
<v Speaker 1>don't have a view on the melt up. What I'd

0:37:37.600 --> 0:37:42.719
<v Speaker 1>say is that the real economy with real businesses is

0:37:42.840 --> 0:37:46.360
<v Speaker 1>pretty constructive virtually everywhere in the world. In fact, some

0:37:46.400 --> 0:37:48.680
<v Speaker 1>countries are still getting better, a few going backwards, but

0:37:48.719 --> 0:37:51.480
<v Speaker 1>they're they're pretty good. So speak of real Let's talk

0:37:51.480 --> 0:37:54.400
<v Speaker 1>about real estate. You guys, obviously a very big player

0:37:54.400 --> 0:37:58.040
<v Speaker 1>in that globally. Uh, Starting in the US, what do

0:37:58.080 --> 0:38:01.399
<v Speaker 1>you make of the especially the commercial real estate business. Look,

0:38:01.400 --> 0:38:04.239
<v Speaker 1>the commercial market, similar to what we just talked about

0:38:04.239 --> 0:38:09.680
<v Speaker 1>in the economy, the commercial market is strong. Office um vacancies,

0:38:10.120 --> 0:38:12.560
<v Speaker 1>occupancies I think are the highest they've ever been in

0:38:12.600 --> 0:38:16.400
<v Speaker 1>most cities. Many cities globally are in the one to

0:38:16.640 --> 0:38:20.800
<v Speaker 1>three percent range. And that's just from a big urbanization

0:38:20.920 --> 0:38:24.520
<v Speaker 1>that's occurring globally. And that's I don't think that's gonna

0:38:24.600 --> 0:38:27.200
<v Speaker 1>change you. It may eben flow, but I don't think

0:38:27.239 --> 0:38:29.160
<v Speaker 1>it's going to change over the next twenty five years.

0:38:29.280 --> 0:38:31.919
<v Speaker 1>And so what does that sort of secular shift mean

0:38:32.360 --> 0:38:36.320
<v Speaker 1>for an investor like you? Does it change where you invest,

0:38:36.400 --> 0:38:39.440
<v Speaker 1>how you invest, what you build, and where look. For example,

0:38:39.560 --> 0:38:42.280
<v Speaker 1>we've had we've always had a big single family business

0:38:42.400 --> 0:38:46.080
<v Speaker 1>in the United States building single family homes in suburban markets,

0:38:46.239 --> 0:38:49.960
<v Speaker 1>and many of the sites were now approving as we're

0:38:50.000 --> 0:38:52.880
<v Speaker 1>going into cities. Yeah, part of our acquisition at GDP

0:38:53.239 --> 0:38:56.600
<v Speaker 1>was we're using those sites to concentrate and build other uses,

0:38:56.680 --> 0:39:01.000
<v Speaker 1>mixed use, residential and other things. Because cities are moving

0:39:01.120 --> 0:39:05.160
<v Speaker 1>further in, people want to live in major groups of people,

0:39:05.880 --> 0:39:08.640
<v Speaker 1>So Speaking of acquisitions, we caught up earlier in our

0:39:08.680 --> 0:39:12.000
<v Speaker 1>show with Howard Marks. You made an acquisition there as well,

0:39:12.040 --> 0:39:15.160
<v Speaker 1>buying oak Tree, agreeing to buy a majority of oak Tree.

0:39:15.480 --> 0:39:17.480
<v Speaker 1>What's next for for that deal? How do you go

0:39:17.560 --> 0:39:21.000
<v Speaker 1>about integrating? Yeah? So, Um, the good news is we

0:39:21.160 --> 0:39:24.840
<v Speaker 1>did a partnership, not an acquisition, which which means that

0:39:24.880 --> 0:39:28.040
<v Speaker 1>we don't have to integrate anything. In fact, Poward, Bruce

0:39:28.160 --> 0:39:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and their management team are the best in the business.

0:39:31.719 --> 0:39:34.440
<v Speaker 1>That's why we did a partnership with them, which means

0:39:34.480 --> 0:39:36.759
<v Speaker 1>that we don't have to do anything. In fact, they

0:39:36.800 --> 0:39:38.399
<v Speaker 1>have to do all the hard work. How they gotta

0:39:38.440 --> 0:39:44.479
<v Speaker 1>run the place. But more said more positively, I just say, um,

0:39:44.600 --> 0:39:47.800
<v Speaker 1>we're excited about having them as part of the franchise.

0:39:47.840 --> 0:39:49.600
<v Speaker 1>There's many things they can do for us and we

0:39:49.640 --> 0:39:52.719
<v Speaker 1>can do for them. But but the businesses are not

0:39:52.719 --> 0:39:54.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be integrated. They're gonna own thirty eight percent

0:39:54.680 --> 0:39:57.080
<v Speaker 1>of it afterwards will be sixty two and we'll we'll

0:39:57.080 --> 0:40:00.520
<v Speaker 1>they'll run the business for us. And why credit at

0:40:00.560 --> 0:40:03.840
<v Speaker 1>this point, you know, like why have why bring that platform?

0:40:03.880 --> 0:40:06.040
<v Speaker 1>And because it's something you haven't done before. Look, look

0:40:06.080 --> 0:40:08.359
<v Speaker 1>we've done it sparingly, but we don't have a big

0:40:08.360 --> 0:40:11.799
<v Speaker 1>business stamp a hunter billion dollar business. They're very good

0:40:11.800 --> 0:40:15.640
<v Speaker 1>at what they do. Our clients increasingly want credit alongside

0:40:15.640 --> 0:40:18.640
<v Speaker 1>the other products, and this was an efficient way to

0:40:18.680 --> 0:40:21.640
<v Speaker 1>get it done with the best in class franchise. UM

0:40:21.800 --> 0:40:24.400
<v Speaker 1>On top of that, at some point in time, the

0:40:24.480 --> 0:40:28.520
<v Speaker 1>markets will turn and we will put our money and

0:40:28.600 --> 0:40:31.759
<v Speaker 1>other things behind their franchise, and I think we can

0:40:31.800 --> 0:40:34.160
<v Speaker 1>become really best in class. Let's talk a little bit

0:40:34.200 --> 0:40:37.000
<v Speaker 1>about a business you're deeply in, and that's infrastructure. There's

0:40:37.040 --> 0:40:40.280
<v Speaker 1>a big meeting tomorrow in Washington. The President is convening

0:40:40.320 --> 0:40:44.279
<v Speaker 1>some folks. He's gonna talk to Nancy Pelosi, Speaker Pelosi,

0:40:44.360 --> 0:40:48.759
<v Speaker 1>and Chuck Schumer Senator Schumer about infrastructure. It has been

0:40:48.880 --> 0:40:51.200
<v Speaker 1>long awaited in the United States. I think anyone who's

0:40:51.280 --> 0:40:54.680
<v Speaker 1>driven anywhere in the United States, are going to any airport,

0:40:54.760 --> 0:40:57.840
<v Speaker 1>knows that there needs to be some investment. There hasn't

0:40:57.880 --> 0:41:01.360
<v Speaker 1>been a lot as of yet. What do you think

0:41:01.680 --> 0:41:03.759
<v Speaker 1>needs to happen and will happen when it comes to

0:41:03.840 --> 0:41:08.600
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure in the United States. First off, look, inevitably all

0:41:08.640 --> 0:41:13.800
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure is going to transfer into private hands. But UM

0:41:13.920 --> 0:41:19.399
<v Speaker 1>until the point that governments are either stretched or are right,

0:41:20.160 --> 0:41:25.000
<v Speaker 1>governments and the individuals a run them are pushed um.

0:41:25.080 --> 0:41:28.480
<v Speaker 1>There it's easier not to do it because people yell

0:41:28.520 --> 0:41:30.000
<v Speaker 1>at you when they have to pay for the tool

0:41:30.080 --> 0:41:32.560
<v Speaker 1>on the road that they didn't have to pay for. Um.

0:41:32.680 --> 0:41:35.400
<v Speaker 1>So it's going to be slow in the OAC countries,

0:41:35.800 --> 0:41:39.040
<v Speaker 1>but it's coming in eventually. And do you see a

0:41:39.080 --> 0:41:42.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of opportunity outside the United States for infrastructure and

0:41:42.640 --> 0:41:44.920
<v Speaker 1>and is there's still an appetite for that invest Yeah, Look,

0:41:44.960 --> 0:41:48.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of When I say this is the largest,

0:41:49.160 --> 0:41:51.319
<v Speaker 1>the largest business in the world is real estate. The

0:41:51.360 --> 0:41:54.480
<v Speaker 1>second largest is infrastructure that it's all built on. So

0:41:54.560 --> 0:41:57.880
<v Speaker 1>these are enormous businesses. And when I say it's slow,

0:41:58.320 --> 0:42:01.759
<v Speaker 1>there's still incredible amounts of infrastructure that are being privatized

0:42:01.800 --> 0:42:05.320
<v Speaker 1>around the world. In fact, much much more outside of

0:42:05.320 --> 0:42:07.560
<v Speaker 1>the United States because it wasn't natural to get a

0:42:07.600 --> 0:42:10.760
<v Speaker 1>paid for and governments don't have the money and therefore

0:42:10.800 --> 0:42:14.240
<v Speaker 1>they're going i'll call it skipping the step of government

0:42:14.239 --> 0:42:17.480
<v Speaker 1>owning it. They're going right to private infrastructure and uh.

0:42:17.480 --> 0:42:20.280
<v Speaker 1>And that's occurring today and and increasingly around the world.

0:42:20.560 --> 0:42:23.720
<v Speaker 1>So when you look across your businesses, whether it's infrastructure

0:42:23.800 --> 0:42:27.440
<v Speaker 1>or real estate or private equity now credit via the

0:42:27.480 --> 0:42:30.959
<v Speaker 1>Oak Tree Partnership. Uh, what worries you the most into

0:42:31.040 --> 0:42:35.000
<v Speaker 1>in twenty nineteen? Where are you seeing any warning signs? Look,

0:42:35.040 --> 0:42:39.000
<v Speaker 1>there's no, Um, we don't see big issues in the

0:42:39.040 --> 0:42:43.760
<v Speaker 1>economy out there. Clearly valuations are higher than they were

0:42:43.800 --> 0:42:46.480
<v Speaker 1>ten years ago, seven years ago, five years ago, three

0:42:46.560 --> 0:42:49.840
<v Speaker 1>years ago, a year ago. In the stock markets and

0:42:50.000 --> 0:42:52.799
<v Speaker 1>interest rates, um, look like they're going up, but they

0:42:52.840 --> 0:42:55.680
<v Speaker 1>don't look like they're going up at the current time. UM.

0:42:55.719 --> 0:42:58.480
<v Speaker 1>But those are the things out there that could disrupt

0:42:58.560 --> 0:43:01.799
<v Speaker 1>the markets when that happens, How it happens. UM. That

0:43:01.920 --> 0:43:05.760
<v Speaker 1>in political issues, but I'd say we when we're investing

0:43:05.760 --> 0:43:08.640
<v Speaker 1>into long businesses, you generally don't As long as you

0:43:08.680 --> 0:43:11.520
<v Speaker 1>pick good countries, you don't get too concerned about short

0:43:11.600 --> 0:43:14.080
<v Speaker 1>term governments. Last question for you. One of the political

0:43:14.080 --> 0:43:16.040
<v Speaker 1>issues out there that I know is in one of

0:43:16.080 --> 0:43:20.399
<v Speaker 1>your backyards or front yards. As Brexit going on there

0:43:20.440 --> 0:43:23.000
<v Speaker 1>in the UK. Maybe it'll happen, maybe it won't. You've

0:43:23.040 --> 0:43:26.319
<v Speaker 1>been pretty clear that the effect on your business has

0:43:26.360 --> 0:43:30.399
<v Speaker 1>been diminimous so far. Still true. Yeah, Look, I would

0:43:30.440 --> 0:43:35.239
<v Speaker 1>say most of our businesses in UH in the UK

0:43:35.440 --> 0:43:39.200
<v Speaker 1>today are doing well. I think longer term the UK

0:43:39.360 --> 0:43:42.400
<v Speaker 1>will still be a great place to invest. In the

0:43:42.520 --> 0:43:45.600
<v Speaker 1>short term, there's no doubt this is disruptive and not

0:43:45.760 --> 0:43:51.520
<v Speaker 1>helpful for business, but like all countries, they will see

0:43:51.520 --> 0:43:55.440
<v Speaker 1>it through. That's Bruce flat the sea of Brookfield Asset Management.

0:43:55.560 --> 0:43:58.319
<v Speaker 1>Such a thoughtful guy, obviously right in the middle of

0:43:58.440 --> 0:44:01.320
<v Speaker 1>big deals. You know, we talked about Ee Schwartzman earlier.

0:44:01.480 --> 0:44:04.120
<v Speaker 1>One of the only real rivals that Blackstone has right

0:44:04.120 --> 0:44:06.480
<v Speaker 1>now is Brookfield, So Jason. Earlier in the broadcast we

0:44:06.560 --> 0:44:08.920
<v Speaker 1>heard from Bruce Flatt, who spoke to you at Milkin

0:44:09.280 --> 0:44:12.719
<v Speaker 1>about why he thinks all infrastructure will eventually become privatized

0:44:12.719 --> 0:44:15.520
<v Speaker 1>and so keeping up with that infrastructure theme, Carroll, who

0:44:15.560 --> 0:44:18.279
<v Speaker 1>better to talk to the U S Transportation Secretary Lane

0:44:18.320 --> 0:44:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Chow and we spoke about that very issue, paying for

0:44:20.600 --> 0:44:23.440
<v Speaker 1>public infrastructure with private funds. You started with the need

0:44:23.480 --> 0:44:26.560
<v Speaker 1>to get more women into government. Here's that conversation you

0:44:26.680 --> 0:44:29.319
<v Speaker 1>participated in a panel here at Milkin, and it's all

0:44:29.360 --> 0:44:33.399
<v Speaker 1>about more participation by women in government. Tell me about

0:44:33.400 --> 0:44:35.920
<v Speaker 1>what still needs to be done. We've made great inroads

0:44:35.920 --> 0:44:38.239
<v Speaker 1>in the last midterm elections, but still so much to

0:44:38.280 --> 0:44:40.160
<v Speaker 1>be done. Well. There are a lot of women in

0:44:40.200 --> 0:44:43.760
<v Speaker 1>the executive branch, and there are also lots of women, um,

0:44:43.800 --> 0:44:46.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, and the federal, state and local government. So

0:44:46.680 --> 0:44:48.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it's good to have more diverse points of

0:44:48.600 --> 0:44:53.200
<v Speaker 1>view because our reality is becoming more complex and more

0:44:53.280 --> 0:44:55.840
<v Speaker 1>eyes and ears around the table that don't think the

0:44:56.000 --> 0:44:59.400
<v Speaker 1>saying actually helps us all to be better at what

0:44:59.440 --> 0:45:02.320
<v Speaker 1>we do well. But and we have made great progress,

0:45:02.320 --> 0:45:04.200
<v Speaker 1>what still needs to be done because women are still

0:45:04.200 --> 0:45:06.560
<v Speaker 1>in the minority, especially in the in the senior positions.

0:45:06.840 --> 0:45:10.000
<v Speaker 1>You are, I think one of the rare individuals who's

0:45:10.040 --> 0:45:13.600
<v Speaker 1>had two cabinet positions, um, But we don't see that

0:45:13.640 --> 0:45:16.200
<v Speaker 1>as a commonality. What do we need to do to

0:45:16.280 --> 0:45:19.399
<v Speaker 1>see that more often and it becomes the norm. Well,

0:45:19.440 --> 0:45:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I believe in public service, and I think that there's

0:45:21.719 --> 0:45:25.719
<v Speaker 1>a proper role for government, and you know, I think

0:45:25.760 --> 0:45:27.880
<v Speaker 1>we need to get out to young girls at an

0:45:27.960 --> 0:45:31.400
<v Speaker 1>earlier age and tell them about the many opportunities that

0:45:31.440 --> 0:45:34.200
<v Speaker 1>are available, not just in one sect or another, but

0:45:34.280 --> 0:45:39.239
<v Speaker 1>it's a constant kind of education process and um to

0:45:39.400 --> 0:45:44.399
<v Speaker 1>learn all about the ability to make impact, the obligation

0:45:44.480 --> 0:45:47.719
<v Speaker 1>to serve your government. I think all of that are

0:45:47.760 --> 0:45:50.239
<v Speaker 1>all very important. Well, what about your own experience? Have

0:45:50.400 --> 0:45:52.920
<v Speaker 1>you ever felt I mean, you're an immigrant who came

0:45:52.960 --> 0:45:56.759
<v Speaker 1>from another country, really set up yourself, established yourself. Have

0:45:56.920 --> 0:46:00.239
<v Speaker 1>you ever felt pushed back as a woman in Washington worse?

0:46:00.320 --> 0:46:02.680
<v Speaker 1>I think I think all women have, you know, or

0:46:02.760 --> 0:46:06.040
<v Speaker 1>if you're just different, you're from the outside, it will

0:46:06.080 --> 0:46:09.520
<v Speaker 1>be difficult to go in any place. That's just life.

0:46:09.840 --> 0:46:12.120
<v Speaker 1>And so I tell a lot of young people, men

0:46:12.160 --> 0:46:16.759
<v Speaker 1>and women, uh, you know, just to develop their interest

0:46:17.040 --> 0:46:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and to be brave and to be curious and to explore.

0:46:22.280 --> 0:46:24.800
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you about infrastructure because I feel

0:46:24.800 --> 0:46:27.480
<v Speaker 1>like this is something but Republicans and Democrats agree we

0:46:27.520 --> 0:46:30.080
<v Speaker 1>need to spend I know at south By Southwest you

0:46:30.120 --> 0:46:32.440
<v Speaker 1>talked about an initiative to really be the adoption of

0:46:32.480 --> 0:46:35.840
<v Speaker 1>new technologies. Where are we going? Where is the President

0:46:35.840 --> 0:46:37.680
<v Speaker 1>on this? Do you really have his ear to say

0:46:37.920 --> 0:46:41.239
<v Speaker 1>we gotta do this? Well, the President doesn't need me

0:46:41.320 --> 0:46:44.560
<v Speaker 1>to remind him. The President feels very strongly about the

0:46:44.640 --> 0:46:49.560
<v Speaker 1>need to address our infrastructure uh state in our country,

0:46:49.719 --> 0:46:52.919
<v Speaker 1>and the biggest problem is how to pay for it.

0:46:53.560 --> 0:46:57.160
<v Speaker 1>And the President has already said that everything's on the

0:46:57.200 --> 0:47:01.920
<v Speaker 1>table and infrastructure is an area where there should be

0:47:02.040 --> 0:47:06.439
<v Speaker 1>bipartisan support. Uh. You know, any long term policy needs

0:47:06.480 --> 0:47:09.239
<v Speaker 1>to be done on a bipartisan basis. And so we

0:47:09.320 --> 0:47:12.560
<v Speaker 1>have said always, the President has said always that infrastructure

0:47:12.640 --> 0:47:15.680
<v Speaker 1>is a real priority and we need to uh talk

0:47:15.760 --> 0:47:18.000
<v Speaker 1>about it. We submitted a bill last year, the very

0:47:18.000 --> 0:47:20.719
<v Speaker 1>twelve there, so we didn't get enough votes. There's so

0:47:20.800 --> 0:47:23.640
<v Speaker 1>much private money out there, where's emity money that is

0:47:23.640 --> 0:47:26.520
<v Speaker 1>ready to do private public partnerships. They've got to be

0:47:26.600 --> 0:47:29.560
<v Speaker 1>coming to Washington saying let's do something. Well, there are

0:47:29.560 --> 0:47:33.399
<v Speaker 1>public or there are private pension funds as well as

0:47:33.840 --> 0:47:37.520
<v Speaker 1>endowment funds that would love the opportunity to invest in

0:47:37.520 --> 0:47:41.840
<v Speaker 1>public infrastructure because they're looking for long term investments and

0:47:41.920 --> 0:47:44.880
<v Speaker 1>with collateral that won't walk away, and that's certainly a

0:47:44.920 --> 0:47:48.280
<v Speaker 1>government project. So I hope that there will be greater

0:47:48.440 --> 0:47:51.960
<v Speaker 1>interest and allowance by the private sector to come in

0:47:52.000 --> 0:47:54.840
<v Speaker 1>because currently there are a number of safe but this

0:47:55.080 --> 0:48:00.040
<v Speaker 1>allow the private sector from investing in public infrastructure. And

0:48:00.080 --> 0:48:03.000
<v Speaker 1>so we have to remove those hurdles and allow the

0:48:03.040 --> 0:48:05.440
<v Speaker 1>private sector to come in because they are a tremendous

0:48:05.480 --> 0:48:07.680
<v Speaker 1>source of capital. One last question I've got to ask

0:48:07.719 --> 0:48:10.200
<v Speaker 1>you because certainly the purview of the Boeing seven thirty

0:48:10.280 --> 0:48:12.840
<v Speaker 1>seven fell under you, the f A we're still waiting

0:48:12.880 --> 0:48:18.239
<v Speaker 1>for ahead to be approved. Um the administration criticized for

0:48:18.360 --> 0:48:21.480
<v Speaker 1>taking so long in grounding it when other count I

0:48:21.480 --> 0:48:24.480
<v Speaker 1>don't think that's fair at all, because the s a

0:48:24.480 --> 0:48:27.840
<v Speaker 1>A who ultimately made the decision to ground the planes

0:48:28.280 --> 0:48:31.000
<v Speaker 1>the seven thirties seven maps is they are a very

0:48:31.200 --> 0:48:36.160
<v Speaker 1>fact based organization and they needed to have facts before

0:48:36.239 --> 0:48:38.719
<v Speaker 1>they can ground the planes, because if you don't have

0:48:39.320 --> 0:48:44.200
<v Speaker 1>affect based reason for grounding the planes, how would you

0:48:44.320 --> 0:48:48.800
<v Speaker 1>explain ungrounding the planes. So we now have a number

0:48:48.960 --> 0:48:53.320
<v Speaker 1>of audits and investigations going on to see what happened

0:48:53.360 --> 0:48:57.840
<v Speaker 1>to the certification of these two planes which occurred uh

0:48:57.880 --> 0:49:01.319
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and twelve and two thou some thirteen right.

0:49:01.480 --> 0:49:04.920
<v Speaker 1>And then we also I have also set up a

0:49:04.960 --> 0:49:10.360
<v Speaker 1>special moverable Committee to look at the certification process going forward.

0:49:10.680 --> 0:49:15.200
<v Speaker 1>And then the FAA is waiting for the software fixed

0:49:15.800 --> 0:49:19.640
<v Speaker 1>from the company before it can obviously se do anything.

0:49:20.160 --> 0:49:23.319
<v Speaker 1>And I want to assure the flying public that safety

0:49:23.360 --> 0:49:26.600
<v Speaker 1>is number one at the Department of Transportation and that

0:49:26.719 --> 0:49:29.520
<v Speaker 1>the f a A A will not sign off on anything

0:49:29.560 --> 0:49:33.360
<v Speaker 1>that they're not totally. Statis fun. That's a lane show.

0:49:33.560 --> 0:49:36.479
<v Speaker 1>So many things that she's dealing with, Infrastructure front and center.

0:49:36.520 --> 0:49:38.160
<v Speaker 1>There was a lot of news about it this week.

0:49:38.800 --> 0:49:41.799
<v Speaker 1>Possibly the potential of both sides of the aisle coming

0:49:41.800 --> 0:49:44.279
<v Speaker 1>together on a big infrastructure plan. We'll see where that goes.

0:49:44.440 --> 0:49:48.120
<v Speaker 1>We will see indeed, And obviously Boeing remains a friend

0:49:48.160 --> 0:49:50.920
<v Speaker 1>of mine for a lot of investors and consumers. We

0:49:50.960 --> 0:49:53.080
<v Speaker 1>all fly on planes all the time. Well, the Department

0:49:53.080 --> 0:49:54.920
<v Speaker 1>of Justice had a big presence at the Milk and

0:49:54.960 --> 0:49:57.160
<v Speaker 1>Institute Global Conference this year. Here we had a pair

0:49:57.200 --> 0:50:00.920
<v Speaker 1>of interviews focusing on tech and security. Yeah, definitely big themes.

0:50:00.920 --> 0:50:02.520
<v Speaker 1>First up, I got the chance to sit down with

0:50:02.560 --> 0:50:07.359
<v Speaker 1>the d o j's Assistant Attorney General Antitrust Division, Making Delwraheim.

0:50:07.680 --> 0:50:11.040
<v Speaker 1>We started by talking about calls to break up big tech. So, Magan,

0:50:11.160 --> 0:50:13.600
<v Speaker 1>let's talk about big tech. And what's funny is you

0:50:13.680 --> 0:50:16.040
<v Speaker 1>and I were talking before. This is a second year

0:50:16.080 --> 0:50:18.120
<v Speaker 1>where there's been a panel saying what's going to happen

0:50:18.160 --> 0:50:21.200
<v Speaker 1>in big tech? Elizabeth Warren is called for a breakup

0:50:21.200 --> 0:50:24.879
<v Speaker 1>of big technology. Where do you stand on this? Well,

0:50:24.880 --> 0:50:27.480
<v Speaker 1>we have, you know, a certain number of standards of

0:50:27.560 --> 0:50:30.360
<v Speaker 1>the antitrust laws and we will look at, you know,

0:50:30.400 --> 0:50:33.080
<v Speaker 1>every industry and apply the laws based on the facts

0:50:33.080 --> 0:50:36.600
<v Speaker 1>of the evidence. I don't know if breaking up any

0:50:36.640 --> 0:50:40.040
<v Speaker 1>particular industry, you know, without having an actual investigation and

0:50:40.120 --> 0:50:43.760
<v Speaker 1>showing there they're doing competitive harm is the right approach

0:50:43.920 --> 0:50:48.400
<v Speaker 1>for antitrust enforcement. But that's an area that you know,

0:50:48.400 --> 0:50:51.319
<v Speaker 1>antitrust enforcers should be looking at, and we certainly are.

0:50:51.719 --> 0:50:53.480
<v Speaker 1>And there's a big technology and then I feel like

0:50:53.480 --> 0:50:56.239
<v Speaker 1>there's Amazon. There isn't any panel I do or any

0:50:56.280 --> 0:50:59.440
<v Speaker 1>conversation I do that Amazon doesn't somehow come up in

0:50:59.480 --> 0:51:02.680
<v Speaker 1>that conference station because there's such a bigger and bigger player,

0:51:02.880 --> 0:51:06.120
<v Speaker 1>not only in retail, but so many other industries. Because Amazon,

0:51:06.160 --> 0:51:08.799
<v Speaker 1>do you look at them at the different category? Well,

0:51:08.840 --> 0:51:11.680
<v Speaker 1>Amazon has been a disruptor and a lot of different sectors,

0:51:12.000 --> 0:51:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and they have a good from your perspective, Well, I

0:51:15.400 --> 0:51:17.960
<v Speaker 1>think when you're a when you're an initial disruptor and

0:51:18.239 --> 0:51:22.600
<v Speaker 1>create more efficient products of services and lower the prices

0:51:22.600 --> 0:51:25.880
<v Speaker 1>to consumers, that's always a positive thing. The problem becomes

0:51:26.160 --> 0:51:29.560
<v Speaker 1>when you have market power and you take certain actions

0:51:29.760 --> 0:51:33.320
<v Speaker 1>that might actually harm competition, which ultimately will harm consumers.

0:51:33.560 --> 0:51:35.600
<v Speaker 1>And that's the type of conduct that we look at.

0:51:35.880 --> 0:51:38.799
<v Speaker 1>As I've said before, you know, big itself is not bad.

0:51:38.840 --> 0:51:41.560
<v Speaker 1>It's big behaving badly, right that becomes a problem for

0:51:41.600 --> 0:51:44.960
<v Speaker 1>antitrust laws. And that's certainly an area that LEA would

0:51:44.960 --> 0:51:47.080
<v Speaker 1>be uh, you know, interested in it. You gotta ask.

0:51:47.120 --> 0:51:50.040
<v Speaker 1>Attorney General William Barr has talked about them dating or

0:51:50.080 --> 0:51:53.560
<v Speaker 1>getting more information on big technology. Um, have you guys

0:51:53.560 --> 0:51:56.640
<v Speaker 1>had discussions about big tech and maybe what needs to

0:51:56.680 --> 0:52:00.000
<v Speaker 1>be done. Well, I want comment about the any private

0:52:00.000 --> 0:52:03.040
<v Speaker 1>conversations have had internally. But the Attorney General, uh, you know,

0:52:03.080 --> 0:52:05.960
<v Speaker 1>we're fortunate to have somebody with his background and his

0:52:06.080 --> 0:52:08.960
<v Speaker 1>knowledge and he, as he said at his confirmation, hearing

0:52:09.520 --> 0:52:12.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, uh, the role of anti trust and how

0:52:12.560 --> 0:52:16.399
<v Speaker 1>some of the largest companies in our economy are are

0:52:16.480 --> 0:52:19.719
<v Speaker 1>interacting is something he wants to explore and I think

0:52:19.719 --> 0:52:22.560
<v Speaker 1>it's an important area. But he's somebody who from his

0:52:22.600 --> 0:52:25.080
<v Speaker 1>background the last twenty five years and the corporate world,

0:52:25.520 --> 0:52:29.520
<v Speaker 1>is uniquely I think, not only qualified, but really appreciates

0:52:29.520 --> 0:52:32.799
<v Speaker 1>the role of anti trust law. He's been a planet

0:52:32.680 --> 0:52:35.720
<v Speaker 1>a defendant uh in the industry, and he's actually argued

0:52:35.760 --> 0:52:39.200
<v Speaker 1>in the European Union before the Commission himself. Does that

0:52:39.239 --> 0:52:44.640
<v Speaker 1>make him more sensitive to business aside or I think

0:52:44.719 --> 0:52:48.560
<v Speaker 1>somebody like him who who you know, appreciates the free

0:52:48.600 --> 0:52:51.239
<v Speaker 1>markets like me, And I think like most people in

0:52:51.280 --> 0:52:54.160
<v Speaker 1>the anti trust world, is that it's our role is

0:52:54.200 --> 0:52:58.440
<v Speaker 1>really to protect competition itself. It's not so much picking

0:52:58.560 --> 0:53:01.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, a business or one embedded or over another

0:53:01.239 --> 0:53:04.600
<v Speaker 1>one technology. And I think it makes them sensitive and

0:53:04.680 --> 0:53:07.960
<v Speaker 1>knowledgeable about the role of the free markets and ultimately

0:53:08.320 --> 0:53:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the benefits of having a free market economy right making.

0:53:11.160 --> 0:53:13.919
<v Speaker 1>I want to ask you about some different corporate situations

0:53:14.200 --> 0:53:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you met recently with T Mobiles. Don Ledger tell me

0:53:16.880 --> 0:53:20.280
<v Speaker 1>about T Mobile and Sprint was what was his message

0:53:20.320 --> 0:53:23.480
<v Speaker 1>to you? What was your reaction? Well, without commenting on

0:53:23.560 --> 0:53:25.680
<v Speaker 1>apending mergers, of course we've made and I think there's

0:53:25.719 --> 0:53:28.480
<v Speaker 1>been some reports that we have had a meetings with

0:53:28.520 --> 0:53:31.040
<v Speaker 1>the parties, which is very normal in a process, and

0:53:31.080 --> 0:53:34.040
<v Speaker 1>of course you know CEOs emerging companies will defend their

0:53:34.080 --> 0:53:37.560
<v Speaker 1>merger and and do that, and you know, beyond that,

0:53:37.680 --> 0:53:40.520
<v Speaker 1>it's it's a transaction that's under our review and it's

0:53:40.560 --> 0:53:43.839
<v Speaker 1>ongoing investigation that we're doing in the transaction. One thing

0:53:43.880 --> 0:53:45.960
<v Speaker 1>that's come to mind, I've heard this in discussions. Are

0:53:45.960 --> 0:53:51.280
<v Speaker 1>you considering sprints struggling financial position in your decision making

0:53:51.320 --> 0:53:54.080
<v Speaker 1>on this deal? Well, Sprint, and then you know the

0:53:54.200 --> 0:53:57.880
<v Speaker 1>argument that you know, a failing firm, you know, maybe

0:53:58.040 --> 0:54:03.440
<v Speaker 1>doesn't impact competition versus a stronger firm financial Ultimately, our

0:54:03.440 --> 0:54:06.160
<v Speaker 1>goal is to make sure there's competition for the benefit

0:54:06.200 --> 0:54:10.040
<v Speaker 1>of consumers and innovation. And Sprint has been a great company.

0:54:10.400 --> 0:54:13.720
<v Speaker 1>They have been an innovator and a disruptor on the price.

0:54:14.400 --> 0:54:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Uh they have. You know, I think there's been reported

0:54:16.920 --> 0:54:19.880
<v Speaker 1>they've raised the issue what's called the flailing h company

0:54:19.920 --> 0:54:22.920
<v Speaker 1>and whether they're not under the antitrust laws. The laws

0:54:22.920 --> 0:54:26.040
<v Speaker 1>recognize what's called a failing firm defense and their strict

0:54:26.080 --> 0:54:28.920
<v Speaker 1>guidelines about that, and we certainly will apply the law

0:54:29.000 --> 0:54:31.759
<v Speaker 1>and the fact that they present to us to that.

0:54:31.840 --> 0:54:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Whether or not those standards are met, we'll have to

0:54:34.200 --> 0:54:38.080
<v Speaker 1>wait and see for the conclusion of the investigation. It

0:54:38.200 --> 0:54:40.880
<v Speaker 1>is something we consider absolutely. When parties raised that as

0:54:40.920 --> 0:54:44.880
<v Speaker 1>an issue, that doesn't mean it always wins something we consider. Okay,

0:54:44.920 --> 0:54:47.720
<v Speaker 1>I want to also ask you about Foxes rsns UM.

0:54:48.160 --> 0:54:51.400
<v Speaker 1>Big three has complained that Starter Communications and Liberty Media

0:54:51.440 --> 0:54:54.760
<v Speaker 1>are really trying to kind of Thwart, it's been Ice Queues,

0:54:55.520 --> 0:54:58.640
<v Speaker 1>Big Three Basketball League, You've got Serena Williams, Snoop Dogg,

0:54:58.680 --> 0:55:02.600
<v Speaker 1>they're all investors in the Is that a factor. Well,

0:55:03.080 --> 0:55:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I've seen the reports of of the allegations of the issue,

0:55:06.680 --> 0:55:10.520
<v Speaker 1>and there's been letters that have been sent into the division. Um,

0:55:10.560 --> 0:55:13.759
<v Speaker 1>it's a you know, certainly, when there's allegations of corruption

0:55:14.000 --> 0:55:17.200
<v Speaker 1>of a bidding process at an auction, it's something that

0:55:17.920 --> 0:55:21.040
<v Speaker 1>raises issues for us to look into to see if

0:55:21.080 --> 0:55:24.160
<v Speaker 1>there's actual credible evidence. And I don't know if there

0:55:24.239 --> 0:55:27.600
<v Speaker 1>is one here yet, but it's something that we always

0:55:27.840 --> 0:55:31.640
<v Speaker 1>looked at when the you know, the free market process

0:55:31.640 --> 0:55:34.400
<v Speaker 1>of fitting is corrupted. We we just had a recent

0:55:34.640 --> 0:55:39.880
<v Speaker 1>criminal investigation where a group of Korean companies had corrupted

0:55:39.920 --> 0:55:43.319
<v Speaker 1>and fixed prices in sales of fuel to the US

0:55:43.360 --> 0:55:46.160
<v Speaker 1>government in the Pentagon, and we had we had asked

0:55:46.160 --> 0:55:49.600
<v Speaker 1>about five settlements and uh, not only criminally but civilly

0:55:49.640 --> 0:55:51.880
<v Speaker 1>recovered and that so it's an area that we we

0:55:51.920 --> 0:55:54.319
<v Speaker 1>are concerned about. There's a lot of areas that I

0:55:54.320 --> 0:55:55.879
<v Speaker 1>know that you're looking at. The Other thing I want

0:55:55.880 --> 0:55:57.920
<v Speaker 1>to ask you about is generic drug companies. I know

0:55:57.960 --> 0:56:01.000
<v Speaker 1>the Department of Justice has been investigating at um price

0:56:01.080 --> 0:56:04.000
<v Speaker 1>fixing by a group of generic drug companies. Where are

0:56:04.040 --> 0:56:05.719
<v Speaker 1>we on this? Because there were some reports at your

0:56:05.760 --> 0:56:08.759
<v Speaker 1>office that's kind of declined to approve some new indictments

0:56:08.840 --> 0:56:11.239
<v Speaker 1>in that case. Is that is that accurate? That is

0:56:11.280 --> 0:56:15.040
<v Speaker 1>not accurate? I have flatly denied those reports. Uh. You know,

0:56:15.080 --> 0:56:19.960
<v Speaker 1>there's you know, requests for opening grand juries and you know,

0:56:20.000 --> 0:56:22.839
<v Speaker 1>indictments that I review and sometimes I send them back

0:56:23.000 --> 0:56:26.920
<v Speaker 1>for additional information or investigation. But as far as declining

0:56:27.440 --> 0:56:30.640
<v Speaker 1>and the indictments, that is just not accurate. I can

0:56:30.760 --> 0:56:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I can confirm it's been a matter of public uh

0:56:34.120 --> 0:56:38.160
<v Speaker 1>record that we have a criminal investigation into the generic

0:56:38.360 --> 0:56:41.600
<v Speaker 1>pharmaceutical industry. We've had two plea agreements of two high

0:56:41.640 --> 0:56:45.160
<v Speaker 1>level executives of one of the pharmaceutic companies. But it's

0:56:45.200 --> 0:56:48.799
<v Speaker 1>a it's a broad investigation looking at multiple products in

0:56:48.840 --> 0:56:51.560
<v Speaker 1>an area where we have some of the most vulnerable clients,

0:56:51.800 --> 0:56:54.120
<v Speaker 1>right the elderly who buy these generic drugs. Do you

0:56:54.160 --> 0:56:57.479
<v Speaker 1>anticipate more charges to come in this investigation? I would

0:56:57.520 --> 0:57:02.600
<v Speaker 1>anticipate that soon. I don't know that the process works itself.

0:57:03.200 --> 0:57:06.040
<v Speaker 1>We don't have a particular timeline, but we're you know,

0:57:06.120 --> 0:57:08.720
<v Speaker 1>in the process of developing that. We've had some public

0:57:08.800 --> 0:57:13.080
<v Speaker 1>filings in the private cases in Pennsylvania, so there's some

0:57:13.160 --> 0:57:15.879
<v Speaker 1>information out there in the public record that's making Del

0:57:16.000 --> 0:57:18.040
<v Speaker 1>raheem he's the Assistant Attorney General for the d o

0:57:18.160 --> 0:57:22.800
<v Speaker 1>j's Antitrust Division. Great conversation. Obviously very timely. He is

0:57:22.840 --> 0:57:25.880
<v Speaker 1>in the midst of some decisions that really will alter

0:57:26.120 --> 0:57:31.640
<v Speaker 1>potentially the course of how we consume telecommunications, media and whatnot.

0:57:31.680 --> 0:57:33.440
<v Speaker 1>He wasn't the only member of the Department Justice that

0:57:33.480 --> 0:57:36.240
<v Speaker 1>we spoke without at Milk and Carroll. John Demmer's the

0:57:36.360 --> 0:57:39.960
<v Speaker 1>DJ's Assistant Attorney General of National Security. He was also

0:57:40.000 --> 0:57:42.280
<v Speaker 1>on hand. So John, great to have you here with us.

0:57:42.440 --> 0:57:45.320
<v Speaker 1>You are participating and milking in a couple of panels

0:57:45.360 --> 0:57:48.680
<v Speaker 1>on national security threat What are the biggest threats to

0:57:48.720 --> 0:57:51.439
<v Speaker 1>the United States right now? So I'm here to talk

0:57:51.480 --> 0:57:55.720
<v Speaker 1>specifically about Chinese economic espionage and talk to the business leaders,

0:57:55.720 --> 0:57:58.880
<v Speaker 1>talk to the investment leaders about the threat to their business,

0:57:58.880 --> 0:58:02.880
<v Speaker 1>to their investments by the theft of intellectual property sponsored

0:58:02.880 --> 0:58:07.640
<v Speaker 1>by the Chinese government. And so what does that threat

0:58:07.760 --> 0:58:11.600
<v Speaker 1>you look like to the average person, the average business person,

0:58:11.840 --> 0:58:14.080
<v Speaker 1>what should they be worried about. So it looks like

0:58:14.240 --> 0:58:17.560
<v Speaker 1>a combination. Sometimes it's a cyber threat, very often it's

0:58:17.600 --> 0:58:20.880
<v Speaker 1>an insider threat, and sometimes it's a combination of vote.

0:58:21.120 --> 0:58:24.120
<v Speaker 1>So the Chinese are using their intelligence services to go

0:58:24.200 --> 0:58:26.560
<v Speaker 1>after and try to co opt insiders and companies the

0:58:26.600 --> 0:58:29.000
<v Speaker 1>way they might use their intelligence services to you know,

0:58:29.240 --> 0:58:32.480
<v Speaker 1>traditional spycraft. Right, So what it looks like from the

0:58:32.480 --> 0:58:35.520
<v Speaker 1>inside could be someone who's works at your company, who's

0:58:35.560 --> 0:58:38.120
<v Speaker 1>downloading data on a thumb drive, who's taking pictures of

0:58:38.120 --> 0:58:41.000
<v Speaker 1>a screen that has data on it, somehow taking that

0:58:41.040 --> 0:58:44.760
<v Speaker 1>technology and then sending it over to China, all as

0:58:44.840 --> 0:58:49.480
<v Speaker 1>part of this rob replicate and replace approach to economic development.

0:58:49.640 --> 0:58:52.200
<v Speaker 1>You robbed the intellectual property of an American company, you

0:58:52.320 --> 0:58:56.040
<v Speaker 1>replicate that product in China, and you then you replace

0:58:56.120 --> 0:58:58.880
<v Speaker 1>the American company on the global market. Eventually, if all

0:58:58.920 --> 0:59:01.480
<v Speaker 1>goes well so for the American worker, then you'll lose

0:59:01.520 --> 0:59:03.920
<v Speaker 1>your job at step three. How often is this happening?

0:59:03.960 --> 0:59:05.960
<v Speaker 1>And I'm always curious about what kind of companies john

0:59:05.960 --> 0:59:09.720
<v Speaker 1>are being targeted. So it's happening increasingly. It's a very

0:59:09.760 --> 0:59:12.600
<v Speaker 1>top down approach. We've had a number of cases recently

0:59:12.600 --> 0:59:17.480
<v Speaker 1>on everything from commercial jet engine technology to b p

0:59:17.640 --> 0:59:22.680
<v Speaker 1>A free linings and soda containers and hands uh and

0:59:23.200 --> 0:59:27.200
<v Speaker 1>they're all priorities set by the Chinese government as part

0:59:27.200 --> 0:59:31.040
<v Speaker 1>of their Made in China plan. And so as you

0:59:31.200 --> 0:59:34.760
<v Speaker 1>talk to executives in the C suite and on down,

0:59:34.920 --> 0:59:39.440
<v Speaker 1>are they worried enough about this? I do think increasingly

0:59:39.520 --> 0:59:42.800
<v Speaker 1>so worried about it, recognizing it and realizing they really

0:59:42.800 --> 0:59:45.160
<v Speaker 1>have to confront this, and realizing it is really a

0:59:45.200 --> 0:59:48.200
<v Speaker 1>combination of cyber defenses, but also being aware of who

0:59:48.280 --> 0:59:50.240
<v Speaker 1>you have working at the company and what they might

0:59:50.280 --> 0:59:53.280
<v Speaker 1>be doing on the computer. Are they accessing data that

0:59:53.320 --> 0:59:55.400
<v Speaker 1>they don't really need to have, Are they downloading data

0:59:55.440 --> 0:59:57.560
<v Speaker 1>that they don't need to download? Are they in the

0:59:57.640 --> 0:59:59.880
<v Speaker 1>office at strange hours when no one else is around?

1:00:00.000 --> 1:00:02.120
<v Speaker 1>All of that, and how much do you run into

1:00:02.160 --> 1:00:05.439
<v Speaker 1>resistance from the perspective of a business saying, look, China

1:00:05.520 --> 1:00:07.479
<v Speaker 1>is a really important customer, or China is a really

1:00:07.480 --> 1:00:11.480
<v Speaker 1>important market, or I've got a partnership with a company there.

1:00:11.480 --> 1:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to jeopardize these things by going overboard.

1:00:14.680 --> 1:00:17.040
<v Speaker 1>So I think you you can't go overboard. We're not

1:00:17.080 --> 1:00:18.960
<v Speaker 1>saying don't do business in China. You have to do

1:00:19.000 --> 1:00:24.320
<v Speaker 1>business in China. That's your company. But the key is

1:00:24.360 --> 1:00:28.200
<v Speaker 1>doing business smartly in China, recognizing the risks and then

1:00:28.240 --> 1:00:30.360
<v Speaker 1>mitigating them. So what data do you put in China?

1:00:30.560 --> 1:00:34.240
<v Speaker 1>What data is accessible from China. That's part of how

1:00:34.280 --> 1:00:37.320
<v Speaker 1>you can mitigate that risk. So it's not you know, yes,

1:00:37.400 --> 1:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>do business in China, just do it smart. That's John

1:00:39.720 --> 1:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>Demmer's Assistant Attorney General of National Security, and I think

1:00:42.440 --> 1:00:45.080
<v Speaker 1>it's such a timely conversation, especially with US China trade

1:00:45.080 --> 1:00:48.320
<v Speaker 1>talks continuing. The US is looking very closely at Chinese

1:00:48.400 --> 1:00:52.240
<v Speaker 1>state actors and their penetration of US companies and i

1:00:52.360 --> 1:00:54.800
<v Speaker 1>P what kind of U S I P is at risk?

1:00:54.920 --> 1:00:56.840
<v Speaker 1>A lot of eyes on that for sure. It's not

1:00:56.960 --> 1:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>an easy issue to untangled. And that wraps up Bloomberg

1:00:59.800 --> 1:01:02.120
<v Speaker 1>Busines this week's weekend podcast. Thanks for joining us. I'm

1:01:02.200 --> 1:01:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Jason Kelly and I'm Carol Master. Be sure to tune

1:01:04.360 --> 1:01:07.360
<v Speaker 1>into Bloomberg Business Week Radio Live Monday through Friday, starting

1:01:07.400 --> 1:01:09.400
<v Speaker 1>at two pm Wall Street Time. And if you can't

1:01:09.400 --> 1:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>catch us live, get our daily podcast download, subscribe at iTunes, SoundCloud,

1:01:13.720 --> 1:01:15.640
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg dot Com. You can get this week's edition

1:01:15.640 --> 1:01:18.200
<v Speaker 1>of the magazine it is on newstands now. We'll be

1:01:18.240 --> 1:01:20.840
<v Speaker 1>back right here next week at the same time. This

1:01:20.960 --> 1:01:21.680
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg