WEBVTT - #169 Wrongful Conviction: False Confessions - Emerson Stevens

0:00:02.440 --> 0:00:04.559
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Wrongful Conviction, False Confessions.

0:00:04.720 --> 0:00:07.080
<v Speaker 2>I'm Laura and I writer and I'm Steve Drisen.

0:00:07.800 --> 0:00:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Today we'll tell you the story of Emerson Stevens, a

0:00:10.600 --> 0:00:14.200
<v Speaker 1>fisherman from Virginia's Chesapeake Bay. When a young mother was

0:00:14.200 --> 0:00:17.440
<v Speaker 1>found murdered. It seemed all the evidence pointed to Emerson

0:00:17.720 --> 0:00:22.080
<v Speaker 1>until the case fell apart. Emerson survived thirty one years

0:00:22.120 --> 0:00:24.799
<v Speaker 1>in prison with the help of an ally from across

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the bay. Now you can help him finally clear his name.

0:00:29.160 --> 0:00:32.000
<v Speaker 1>Today's episode is based on interviews with Emerson Stevens and

0:00:32.040 --> 0:00:44.560
<v Speaker 1>his lawyers, along with legal filings and court opinions. So, Steve,

0:00:44.680 --> 0:00:46.040
<v Speaker 1>today we're going to break the mold.

0:00:46.280 --> 0:00:48.279
<v Speaker 2>We're going to break them mold. This is not a

0:00:48.320 --> 0:00:51.840
<v Speaker 2>case that involves a false confession. This is a case

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:57.400
<v Speaker 2>that involves a false inculpatory statement. Sometimes detectives can't get

0:00:57.400 --> 0:01:02.320
<v Speaker 2>a confession, but they'll settle for a fall and culpatory statement. Right.

0:01:02.440 --> 0:01:04.560
<v Speaker 1>That's lawyer talk for something you say that makes you

0:01:04.600 --> 0:01:05.319
<v Speaker 1>look really bad.

0:01:05.640 --> 0:01:08.920
<v Speaker 2>That's exactly right, and it's false. So it's a lie.

0:01:09.319 --> 0:01:12.279
<v Speaker 2>And the same tactics that are used to get false

0:01:12.360 --> 0:01:17.320
<v Speaker 2>confessions are often used to get these false inculplatory statements,

0:01:17.360 --> 0:01:17.720
<v Speaker 2>and they.

0:01:17.600 --> 0:01:19.640
<v Speaker 1>Can have the same devastating consequences.

0:01:20.959 --> 0:01:23.760
<v Speaker 2>So when I think about this case, I think about

0:01:23.800 --> 0:01:26.160
<v Speaker 2>it in terms of a puzzle. You know, when my

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:29.440
<v Speaker 2>family goes on vacation, we often buy a puzzle and

0:01:29.480 --> 0:01:31.959
<v Speaker 2>we spend a lot of time putting that puzzle together.

0:01:32.240 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 2>And anyone who puts puzzles together knows that there are

0:01:36.160 --> 0:01:38.600
<v Speaker 2>a lot of times where the piece that you think

0:01:38.800 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 2>will finish a part of the puzzle doesn't quite fit.

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:46.600
<v Speaker 2>It looks like it should fit, but just a little

0:01:46.640 --> 0:01:50.280
<v Speaker 2>bit off. And that's what happened with a lot of

0:01:50.320 --> 0:01:56.360
<v Speaker 2>the evidence in Emerson Stephen's case. They manipulated the evidence

0:01:56.400 --> 0:02:00.080
<v Speaker 2>to make it seem like it fit. The police theory what.

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:03.280
<v Speaker 1>Happens in runfuel conviction cases right tunnel vision makes police

0:02:03.280 --> 0:02:07.000
<v Speaker 1>officers force these puzzle pieces together when in reality they

0:02:07.120 --> 0:02:08.000
<v Speaker 1>might not fit at all.

0:02:08.120 --> 0:02:11.080
<v Speaker 2>It was only after the fact that you could see

0:02:11.080 --> 0:02:14.360
<v Speaker 2>that the pieces never really fit in the first place.

0:02:18.120 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>Today's story takes place in Lancaster County, Virginia, a rural

0:02:21.440 --> 0:02:24.679
<v Speaker 1>community nestled between the Chesapeake Bay and the Rappahannock River.

0:02:25.160 --> 0:02:28.120
<v Speaker 1>It's a place that smells like ocean salt an honest

0:02:28.200 --> 0:02:31.639
<v Speaker 1>sweat generations there have made a living with their hands,

0:02:31.880 --> 0:02:34.320
<v Speaker 1>hauling fish out of the bay and crabs and oysters

0:02:34.320 --> 0:02:37.280
<v Speaker 1>out of the river. In nineteen eighty five, this county

0:02:37.320 --> 0:02:40.640
<v Speaker 1>was home to Mary Harding, who was Lancaster through and through.

0:02:41.400 --> 0:02:44.640
<v Speaker 1>Petite and blue eyed, Mary was homecoming queen at Lancaster

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>High before she and her high school sweetheart tied the knot.

0:02:48.680 --> 0:02:51.240
<v Speaker 1>By age twenty four, Mary was working as a bookkeeper

0:02:51.280 --> 0:02:53.600
<v Speaker 1>at the local bank while her husband was a fisherman.

0:02:54.080 --> 0:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>They had two young kids and a modest ranch home

0:02:57.120 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>located just across the street from the cemetery. On Friday,

0:03:03.240 --> 0:03:06.640
<v Speaker 1>August twenty third, nineteen eighty five, that modest home became

0:03:06.680 --> 0:03:09.840
<v Speaker 1>the scene of a terrible discovery. On weekdays, Mary had

0:03:09.880 --> 0:03:12.440
<v Speaker 1>a routine before work, she'd drop off her one year

0:03:12.480 --> 0:03:15.239
<v Speaker 1>old at the home of her husband's grandmother, Virginia Walker,

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:19.440
<v Speaker 1>But that Friday morning, Mary didn't show up. Virginia was worried,

0:03:19.520 --> 0:03:22.680
<v Speaker 1>so she drove over to Mary's house. Virginia was greeted

0:03:22.720 --> 0:03:25.679
<v Speaker 1>at the door by Mary's four year old son, who

0:03:25.720 --> 0:03:28.680
<v Speaker 1>told her that he couldn't find his mom. The TV

0:03:28.840 --> 0:03:32.400
<v Speaker 1>and lights were on throughout the house, Some unrensed comet

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 1>was left in the bathroom sink, and the little boy's

0:03:35.240 --> 0:03:37.840
<v Speaker 1>chicken dinner from the night before was still sitting on

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 1>the table. Don't worry, the four year old assured his

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:44.160
<v Speaker 1>great grandma. In his mother's absence, he was taking care

0:03:44.200 --> 0:03:47.480
<v Speaker 1>of the baby. Virginia knew there was no way Mary

0:03:47.480 --> 0:03:51.360
<v Speaker 1>would abandon her children. There's only one explanation for her disappearance.

0:03:51.800 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Mary must have been taken. Virginia calls the police, and

0:03:55.560 --> 0:03:58.120
<v Speaker 1>soon a state police detective by the name of David

0:03:58.200 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Riley arrives at the house. He finds cat litter scattered

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>on the ground outside the back door, along with one

0:04:03.960 --> 0:04:07.280
<v Speaker 1>of Mary's white sandals, but there's no sign of Mary.

0:04:08.040 --> 0:04:11.840
<v Speaker 1>Pretty soon, word spreads and the whole community starts surging

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:15.280
<v Speaker 1>through the woods and along the shore. But they find nothing.

0:04:16.160 --> 0:04:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Nothing that is until four days later. That's when a

0:04:19.200 --> 0:04:22.240
<v Speaker 1>woman's body is found in the shallows of the Rappahannock River.

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:26.520
<v Speaker 1>The body is unclothed, badly decomposed, and hard to identify,

0:04:27.000 --> 0:04:30.599
<v Speaker 1>but it's clear something horrific has happened. The woman's back

0:04:30.640 --> 0:04:34.480
<v Speaker 1>is covered with deep, evenly spaced slashes. There's a rope

0:04:34.560 --> 0:04:37.640
<v Speaker 1>tied around her neck with a huge cinder block attached

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:40.320
<v Speaker 1>to the other end. A heavy chain is wrapped around

0:04:40.320 --> 0:04:43.960
<v Speaker 1>the woman's right leg. Soon enough, the medical examiner confirms

0:04:44.560 --> 0:04:48.520
<v Speaker 1>this is Mary Harding. She's been strangled to death. Now

0:04:48.560 --> 0:04:51.479
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing. The rope and chain were the same

0:04:51.560 --> 0:04:54.600
<v Speaker 1>kind that you can find on most fishermen's boats in Lancaster.

0:04:55.200 --> 0:04:58.919
<v Speaker 1>So suddenly this close knit community was being torn apart

0:04:59.120 --> 0:05:02.720
<v Speaker 1>by suspicion. Everyone was wondering who would have done this

0:05:02.760 --> 0:05:06.120
<v Speaker 1>to the homecoming queen. Before long, the authorities settled on

0:05:06.160 --> 0:05:11.120
<v Speaker 1>a suspect, thirty two year old Emerson Stevens. Like so

0:05:11.200 --> 0:05:13.960
<v Speaker 1>many other Lancaster men, Emerson had worked on the water

0:05:14.120 --> 0:05:16.919
<v Speaker 1>since he was a teenager. Emerson was a crabber and

0:05:17.000 --> 0:05:19.920
<v Speaker 1>an oysterman who hauled his catch in on a boat

0:05:20.000 --> 0:05:22.919
<v Speaker 1>named after his wife. He'd spent his life by the shore,

0:05:23.200 --> 0:05:25.560
<v Speaker 1>the kind of guy who has salt water in his veins.

0:05:26.720 --> 0:05:29.480
<v Speaker 1>It was Mary's husband who pointed police to Emerson Stephens.

0:05:29.960 --> 0:05:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Emerson had gone to Mary's funeral, and Mary's husband thought

0:05:33.120 --> 0:05:37.000
<v Speaker 1>Emerson seemed nervous there. Mary's husband also remembered that he'd

0:05:37.040 --> 0:05:40.520
<v Speaker 1>once heard Emerson make a crude joke about female anatomy.

0:05:41.080 --> 0:05:44.080
<v Speaker 1>This wasn't much to go on, but days later, a

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:46.680
<v Speaker 1>couple of people told police they had seen a light

0:05:46.760 --> 0:05:51.560
<v Speaker 1>colored pickup truck outside Mary's home on the night she disappeared. Now,

0:05:51.640 --> 0:05:55.360
<v Speaker 1>Emerson Stevens happened to drive a white Dodge pickup, so

0:05:55.400 --> 0:06:01.520
<v Speaker 1>he quickly became the police's number one suspect. Detective Riley

0:06:01.560 --> 0:06:04.760
<v Speaker 1>asks Emerson to meet him at Mary Harding's house and

0:06:04.800 --> 0:06:07.679
<v Speaker 1>the two men sit down on the front porch. According

0:06:07.720 --> 0:06:11.440
<v Speaker 1>to Emerson, Riley gestures to the street and asks, why

0:06:11.480 --> 0:06:14.280
<v Speaker 1>were you parked in front of this house the night

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:15.080
<v Speaker 1>Mary vanished.

0:06:15.480 --> 0:06:19.120
<v Speaker 2>If you question somebody on the porch, you're creating a

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:23.400
<v Speaker 2>context that is different from your standard police interrogation. You

0:06:23.440 --> 0:06:28.200
<v Speaker 2>can tap into all of the emotions of This is

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:31.360
<v Speaker 2>where this woman lived, this is where she had her children,

0:06:31.720 --> 0:06:35.480
<v Speaker 2>this is where she was last seen. This is not

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 2>a police interrogation room.

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:38.919
<v Speaker 1>It feels like the kind of place where you'd have

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:41.800
<v Speaker 1>a heart to heart conversation. And there's another thing that

0:06:41.839 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 1>makes this porch interrogation even more emotional.

0:06:44.360 --> 0:06:49.159
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, not only was this the front porch of Mary's house,

0:06:49.760 --> 0:06:53.279
<v Speaker 2>it was right across the street from the burial ground

0:06:53.600 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 2>where her headstone was.

0:06:57.440 --> 0:07:00.040
<v Speaker 1>As the two men look out at the cemetery, he

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:04.400
<v Speaker 1>presses Emerson for information, but Emerson is stunned he hadn't

0:07:04.440 --> 0:07:07.120
<v Speaker 1>been at Mary's house. He says he'd been at home,

0:07:07.360 --> 0:07:09.400
<v Speaker 1>then he'd taken his kids over to the neighbors to

0:07:09.440 --> 0:07:12.880
<v Speaker 1>watch TV and eat crab. They'd returned home together at

0:07:12.880 --> 0:07:15.920
<v Speaker 1>about nine thirty PM, and Emerson's wife had gotten home

0:07:15.920 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 1>from work shortly after. He tells Riley to talk to

0:07:19.040 --> 0:07:22.560
<v Speaker 1>his neighbor and confirm the alibi, but Riley doesn't buy

0:07:22.560 --> 0:07:26.960
<v Speaker 1>Emerson's story. Instead, he orders a search of Emerson's pickup truck.

0:07:27.360 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 1>After digging through the truck for hours, police discover a

0:07:30.400 --> 0:07:33.520
<v Speaker 1>single strand of hair. They send the hair off to

0:07:33.560 --> 0:07:37.400
<v Speaker 1>the state crime lab for forensic analysis. The next week,

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:40.280
<v Speaker 1>Riley asks Emerson to come to a nearby Virginia police

0:07:40.280 --> 0:07:43.760
<v Speaker 1>station for a polygraph. As soon as the polygraph's completed,

0:07:44.280 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 1>Riley tells Emerson he failed. According to Emerson, Riley says

0:07:48.760 --> 0:07:52.000
<v Speaker 1>he must either have killed Mary Harding or done something

0:07:52.040 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 1>else related to her murder. Those are two pretty bad options,

0:07:55.920 --> 0:07:59.800
<v Speaker 1>and Emerson is terrified. But then Riley offers Emerson a

0:07:59.840 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>fat third choice that seems a lot better. Maybe you

0:08:04.000 --> 0:08:07.400
<v Speaker 1>were at Mary's house that night doing something innocent. Maybe

0:08:07.440 --> 0:08:09.920
<v Speaker 1>you were driving by and you stopped on the side

0:08:09.960 --> 0:08:13.240
<v Speaker 1>of the road to take a leak. The fisherman takes

0:08:13.280 --> 0:08:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the bait. He's desperate to please Riley and changes his

0:08:16.360 --> 0:08:18.640
<v Speaker 1>story to exactly what Riley suggested.

0:08:19.040 --> 0:08:23.160
<v Speaker 2>If detectives can't get a full confession, they'll settle for

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:27.800
<v Speaker 2>a false inculpatory statement. All the detective can get from

0:08:27.840 --> 0:08:31.320
<v Speaker 2>Emerson is a statement that he pulled over on the

0:08:31.360 --> 0:08:34.960
<v Speaker 2>side of the road a short distance away from Mary's

0:08:34.960 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 2>house to relieve himself at the approximate time of death.

0:08:40.040 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 2>That's the admission. I was in the vicinity of her

0:08:43.760 --> 0:08:47.720
<v Speaker 2>home near the time where the medical examiner believes she

0:08:47.920 --> 0:08:48.440
<v Speaker 2>was killed.

0:08:48.920 --> 0:08:51.960
<v Speaker 1>That was all Emerson said. He did not confess, but

0:08:52.000 --> 0:08:54.800
<v Speaker 1>he'd said enough to get himself in real trouble. He

0:08:55.080 --> 0:09:00.400
<v Speaker 1>just placed himself at the crime scene. Detective was on

0:09:00.600 --> 0:09:03.640
<v Speaker 1>high alert, but the case against Emerson was pretty damn

0:09:03.720 --> 0:09:07.280
<v Speaker 1>thin until test results came back from the state crime

0:09:07.360 --> 0:09:10.880
<v Speaker 1>lab on that hair from Emerson's truck. The lab had

0:09:10.880 --> 0:09:13.480
<v Speaker 1>put the hair under a microscope and compared it to

0:09:13.520 --> 0:09:16.719
<v Speaker 1>Mary Harding's hair, and the lab said it was an

0:09:16.760 --> 0:09:21.760
<v Speaker 1>exact match. The police's thin case suddenly seemed rock solid,

0:09:22.320 --> 0:09:25.760
<v Speaker 1>and in late October nineteen eighty five, Emerson Stephens was

0:09:25.840 --> 0:09:39.080
<v Speaker 1>arrested for the abduction and murder of Mary Harding. The

0:09:39.120 --> 0:09:41.640
<v Speaker 1>trial of Emerson Stephens was one of the most dramatic

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:45.400
<v Speaker 1>events Lancaster County had ever seen. To a packed courtroom,

0:09:45.480 --> 0:09:50.160
<v Speaker 1>prosecutors described how they thought the crime unfolded. Emerson kidnapped Mary,

0:09:50.240 --> 0:09:53.360
<v Speaker 1>they said, then strangled her and threw her body into

0:09:53.360 --> 0:09:57.200
<v Speaker 1>the river. They even suggested that Emerson slashed Mary's back

0:09:57.320 --> 0:10:01.000
<v Speaker 1>with his fishing knife in order to attract so there

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't be anything left of her body.

0:10:03.160 --> 0:10:07.560
<v Speaker 2>The worst imaginable kind of crime. It's like throwing chum

0:10:07.720 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 2>over the side of a boat to entice sharks.

0:10:11.160 --> 0:10:14.400
<v Speaker 1>But there were problems with the prosecution's theory. They claimed

0:10:14.400 --> 0:10:17.480
<v Speaker 1>that Emerson had thrown Mary's body into the river off

0:10:17.480 --> 0:10:19.880
<v Speaker 1>the end of his own dock, but her body was

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:23.280
<v Speaker 1>actually found a full ten miles upstream.

0:10:25.440 --> 0:10:28.280
<v Speaker 2>How does a body that is weighed down with a

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:35.720
<v Speaker 2>cinder block travel ten miles upstream? Upstream means against the current.

0:10:35.679 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 1>That's the thing I mean to swim those ten miles

0:10:37.559 --> 0:10:40.559
<v Speaker 1>upstream would have been crazy, let alone somehow to float

0:10:40.640 --> 0:10:43.440
<v Speaker 1>a weighted down body that distance. It makes no sense

0:10:43.480 --> 0:10:47.280
<v Speaker 1>at all. It's absurd, But prosecutors found a witness to

0:10:47.360 --> 0:10:51.440
<v Speaker 1>bolster this theory insane, though it seemed. A marine scientist

0:10:51.520 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 1>testified that it was possible for Mary's body to float

0:10:55.120 --> 0:10:58.760
<v Speaker 1>against the current cinderblock and all for ten miles from

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:01.719
<v Speaker 1>Emerson's dock to where it was found, and there were

0:11:01.720 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 1>other witnesses too. Detective Riley told the jury that Emerson

0:11:05.640 --> 0:11:07.760
<v Speaker 1>claimed to have been near Mary's house on the night

0:11:07.840 --> 0:11:11.800
<v Speaker 1>she disappeared, and the prosecution called two people to corroborate

0:11:11.920 --> 0:11:16.439
<v Speaker 1>Emerson's statement, Clyde Dunaway and Anne Dick. They both claimed

0:11:16.440 --> 0:11:19.640
<v Speaker 1>they'd seen a pickup truck resembling Emerson's near the victim's

0:11:19.679 --> 0:11:22.960
<v Speaker 1>house that night, and finally, the prosecution called a witness

0:11:23.000 --> 0:11:25.599
<v Speaker 1>from the crime lab to testify that the hare and

0:11:25.679 --> 0:11:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Emerson's truck seemed to match Mary's.

0:11:28.240 --> 0:11:31.199
<v Speaker 2>So it seemed at this point as though all the

0:11:31.240 --> 0:11:35.880
<v Speaker 2>puzzle pieces fit together, and they painted a compelling portrait

0:11:36.480 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 2>of Emerson's guilt. But this is not the end of

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:42.800
<v Speaker 2>the story, not by a long shot.

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:45.720
<v Speaker 1>When the defense's turn came, Emerson's lawyers put on a

0:11:45.720 --> 0:11:50.040
<v Speaker 1>strong case of their own, no fewer than four alibi witnesses.

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:53.680
<v Speaker 1>In the end, the jury hung unable to reach a verdict.

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:58.000
<v Speaker 1>The prosecution was quick to retry Emerson, and on July eighth,

0:11:58.080 --> 0:12:01.760
<v Speaker 1>nineteen eighty six, the second trial began. This time, the

0:12:01.760 --> 0:12:06.560
<v Speaker 1>prosecution's case seemed, if anything, weaker. The marine scientist was

0:12:06.600 --> 0:12:09.400
<v Speaker 1>a no show, so the prosecutor read the jury his

0:12:09.440 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 1>testimony from the previous trial. Only one witness, Clyde Dunaway,

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:17.240
<v Speaker 1>testified about seeing Emerson's pickup near Mary's house, but the

0:12:17.320 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 1>crime lab technician repeated his previous testimony about the hair

0:12:20.960 --> 0:12:25.120
<v Speaker 1>in the truck, and Detective Riley testified again about Emerson's statements.

0:12:25.880 --> 0:12:28.640
<v Speaker 1>During the second trial, Emerson's lawyer put on his alibi

0:12:28.679 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 1>witnesses again, and Emerson himself took the stand. He tried

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:36.559
<v Speaker 1>to explain that he was innocent, that he hadn't actually

0:12:36.559 --> 0:12:39.400
<v Speaker 1>pulled over near Mary's house that night. He'd only said

0:12:39.400 --> 0:12:44.440
<v Speaker 1>that to satisfy his interrogator. Prosecutors pounced, you admit to

0:12:44.520 --> 0:12:48.640
<v Speaker 1>us you lied, They asked, yes, I told that, Emerson

0:12:48.679 --> 0:12:52.720
<v Speaker 1>answered Later he quietly added, I'm not a smart person.

0:12:54.720 --> 0:12:57.040
<v Speaker 1>The case wasn't any stronger than at the first trial,

0:12:57.559 --> 0:13:01.439
<v Speaker 1>But this time the jury reached a verdict and Emerson

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Stevens was sentenced to a prison term of one hundred

0:13:04.440 --> 0:13:12.679
<v Speaker 1>and sixty four years. Fast forward to two thousand and two.

0:13:12.840 --> 0:13:16.679
<v Speaker 1>During those sixteen years behind bars, Emerson earned his ged.

0:13:17.440 --> 0:13:20.880
<v Speaker 1>He worked in the dusty prison wood shop, building furniture

0:13:20.960 --> 0:13:24.840
<v Speaker 1>for state institutions. He wrote letters constantly to his family

0:13:24.880 --> 0:13:28.160
<v Speaker 1>and to lawyers, begging for help with his case. When

0:13:28.200 --> 0:13:31.200
<v Speaker 1>he wasn't working or writing, Emerson would dream about the

0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:34.160
<v Speaker 1>smell of the shore. He wondered if he'd ever be

0:13:34.240 --> 0:13:37.120
<v Speaker 1>on the water again. In April two thousand and two,

0:13:37.400 --> 0:13:40.720
<v Speaker 1>Emerson's attention was caught by a news story about a

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:45.440
<v Speaker 1>genteel Virginia lady named Beverly Monroe. Beverly was a professional

0:13:45.559 --> 0:13:49.520
<v Speaker 1>chemist whose upper middle class background seemed worlds away from Emerson,

0:13:49.960 --> 0:13:53.720
<v Speaker 1>at least at first you see. Ten years earlier, fifty

0:13:53.800 --> 0:13:56.560
<v Speaker 1>five year old Beverly had been dating a wealthy real

0:13:56.640 --> 0:14:00.160
<v Speaker 1>estate mogul named Roger de la Bird. Roger lived on

0:14:00.240 --> 0:14:04.160
<v Speaker 1>a massive estate in Virginia Horse Country. He claimed to

0:14:04.160 --> 0:14:07.199
<v Speaker 1>be an art dealer who was descended from European nobility.

0:14:07.800 --> 0:14:10.280
<v Speaker 1>But when Roger turned up dead one morning from a

0:14:10.320 --> 0:14:15.080
<v Speaker 1>gunshot wound, police suspected Beverly of murder, even though she'd

0:14:15.080 --> 0:14:18.040
<v Speaker 1>never had so much as a traffic ticket. The case

0:14:18.080 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 1>against Beverly was absurd from day one. Beverly had a

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:24.800
<v Speaker 1>grocery store receipt proving she hadn't been at Roger's estate

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:27.400
<v Speaker 1>at the time he died, and Roger's death had been

0:14:27.480 --> 0:14:31.080
<v Speaker 1>ruled a suicide. Turns out his life was falling apart.

0:14:31.560 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 1>The FBI was investigating him for art fraud, and his

0:14:34.680 --> 0:14:38.040
<v Speaker 1>claims of nobility were also being exposed as phony. But

0:14:38.120 --> 0:14:41.440
<v Speaker 1>Beverly ended up being wrongly convicted of Roger's murder anyway.

0:14:42.040 --> 0:14:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Why because in part of Detective David Riley, the same

0:14:46.160 --> 0:14:50.120
<v Speaker 1>officer who'd built the case against Emerson Stevens. When Detective

0:14:50.200 --> 0:14:53.280
<v Speaker 1>Riley interrogated Beverly, she refused to admit to something she

0:14:53.440 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 1>didn't do, but Riley administered a polygraph and told Beverly

0:14:57.440 --> 0:15:00.240
<v Speaker 1>she failed it, and then he suggested that she must

0:15:00.280 --> 0:15:04.080
<v Speaker 1>have been present when Roger shot himself. Detective Riley seems

0:15:04.120 --> 0:15:07.520
<v Speaker 1>to have manipulated Beverly into placing herself at the scene

0:15:07.560 --> 0:15:09.760
<v Speaker 1>of the crime, just like he seems to have done

0:15:09.800 --> 0:15:12.760
<v Speaker 1>with Emerson. The similarities are unmistakable.

0:15:13.120 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 2>Beverly Monroe was wrongfully convicted based on inculpatory statements that

0:15:20.520 --> 0:15:25.160
<v Speaker 2>placed her at the crime scene, and Riley then built

0:15:25.240 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 2>his case around that statement to make it look like

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:34.120
<v Speaker 2>this wasn't a suicide at all, that this was a murder.

0:15:34.240 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 1>It's amazing, just like Emerson, Beverly never confessed to anything.

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:42.800
<v Speaker 2>Same detective using the same modus operandi in order to

0:15:42.840 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 2>get not a false confession, but a false inculpatory statement

0:15:47.280 --> 0:15:50.160
<v Speaker 2>that was used to convict them and send them away

0:15:50.200 --> 0:15:52.200
<v Speaker 2>for crimes they did not commit.

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:56.200
<v Speaker 1>A federal judge later called Riley's interrogation of Beverly Monroe

0:15:56.360 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 1>deceitful and manipulative. Even so, Beverly ended up serving ten

0:16:00.800 --> 0:16:03.840
<v Speaker 1>years in prison before her conviction was thrown out and

0:16:03.880 --> 0:16:06.800
<v Speaker 1>she was released in April two thousand and two. That

0:16:06.960 --> 0:16:10.360
<v Speaker 1>news story Emerson saw on TV from behind bars was

0:16:10.400 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 1>about Beverly's first moments of freedom. Emerson didn't waste a minute.

0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:17.880
<v Speaker 1>He immediately wrote to Beverly's lawyer, who agreed to take

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 1>his case and When Beverly herself heard about Emerson, she

0:16:21.880 --> 0:16:22.720
<v Speaker 1>got involved too.

0:16:23.280 --> 0:16:26.200
<v Speaker 3>She went to the lawyers that had just exonerated her

0:16:26.800 --> 0:16:29.880
<v Speaker 3>and said, now you need to do it again for

0:16:29.960 --> 0:16:33.520
<v Speaker 3>this other guy, which, you know, to their credit, they did.

0:16:33.920 --> 0:16:36.680
<v Speaker 3>They tried to reinvestigate as much as they could, and

0:16:36.720 --> 0:16:39.600
<v Speaker 3>then when it became clear that they were sort of

0:16:39.640 --> 0:16:42.080
<v Speaker 3>losing steam, Beverly turned her sights to me.

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:45.520
<v Speaker 1>That's Deirdre Enwright, the director of the University of Virginia's

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Innocence Project Clinic. She's one of the lawyers Beverly enlisted

0:16:49.120 --> 0:16:50.440
<v Speaker 1>to join Emerson's legal team.

0:16:50.680 --> 0:16:54.040
<v Speaker 3>Emerson, you know, he had been trying for years, writing

0:16:54.040 --> 0:16:57.360
<v Speaker 3>to people about his case and begging for help. And

0:16:57.480 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 3>if you ever meet or speak to Beverly, you will

0:16:59.600 --> 0:17:02.040
<v Speaker 3>learn that you will do anything that Beverly says to do,

0:17:02.760 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 3>because she's absolutely charming but also absolutely compelling.

0:17:07.560 --> 0:17:09.240
<v Speaker 4>Beverly made it something of.

0:17:09.200 --> 0:17:13.280
<v Speaker 3>A mission to help other people who were convicted by

0:17:13.280 --> 0:17:15.200
<v Speaker 3>the evidence collected by the same detective.

0:17:15.400 --> 0:17:18.480
<v Speaker 1>With Beverly's help, Emerson now had a top notch legal team.

0:17:19.000 --> 0:17:21.880
<v Speaker 1>And while the lawyers got to work, Beverly and Emerson

0:17:22.000 --> 0:17:23.040
<v Speaker 1>began corresponding.

0:17:23.320 --> 0:17:27.280
<v Speaker 3>Beverly is not only college educated, but she's a chemist

0:17:27.320 --> 0:17:30.680
<v Speaker 3>and she lived a very extravagant life with her partner

0:17:30.800 --> 0:17:35.840
<v Speaker 3>before this all happened. And Emerson is this waterman who

0:17:35.880 --> 0:17:39.800
<v Speaker 3>grew up with his nine siblings in Lancaster. I mean,

0:17:39.800 --> 0:17:42.480
<v Speaker 3>this is the classic thing that happens in these wrongful

0:17:42.480 --> 0:17:45.560
<v Speaker 3>conviction cases, is that people who would never in a

0:17:45.640 --> 0:17:49.280
<v Speaker 3>lifetime be near each other or connect do.

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:53.679
<v Speaker 1>Beverly and Emerson became friends. Beverly sendsed how much this

0:17:53.800 --> 0:17:57.240
<v Speaker 1>fisherman longed for the water, and started sending him photographs

0:17:57.280 --> 0:18:00.159
<v Speaker 1>of the place he missed most, the Chesapeake Bay.

0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:03.359
<v Speaker 3>She was hyper aware of taking care of him while

0:18:03.359 --> 0:18:06.959
<v Speaker 3>he was incarcerated so he didn't feel abandoned, writing and

0:18:07.000 --> 0:18:09.920
<v Speaker 3>calling and making sure he had money in his commissary

0:18:10.080 --> 0:18:14.800
<v Speaker 3>and holidays and birthdays. And I remember thinking, she knows

0:18:14.880 --> 0:18:17.920
<v Speaker 3>what he's feeling better than any of us. I think

0:18:17.960 --> 0:18:22.000
<v Speaker 3>that Emerson, once he had Beverly, he knew that there

0:18:22.040 --> 0:18:26.000
<v Speaker 3>was another person out there who was advocating for him ferociously.

0:18:26.880 --> 0:18:27.919
<v Speaker 4>I mean, most people who.

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:30.960
<v Speaker 3>Are incarcerated don't have that person. And because she was

0:18:30.960 --> 0:18:33.360
<v Speaker 3>so smart and because she had been through it, she

0:18:33.440 --> 0:18:35.520
<v Speaker 3>wasn't going to hear that it couldn't be done.

0:18:35.760 --> 0:18:39.160
<v Speaker 1>While Beverly was keeping Emerson's hope alive, his legal team

0:18:39.280 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 1>was systematically unwinding the case against him, and, as it

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:46.160
<v Speaker 1>turned out, one piece of faulty evidence after another seemed

0:18:46.200 --> 0:18:49.560
<v Speaker 1>to lead back to Detective Riley. First up was the

0:18:49.560 --> 0:18:52.199
<v Speaker 1>claim that witnesses had seen a white pickup truck like

0:18:52.280 --> 0:18:55.879
<v Speaker 1>Emerson's near Mary's house. A woman named Anne Dick had

0:18:55.920 --> 0:18:58.560
<v Speaker 1>testified to that effect at the first trial, but her

0:18:58.600 --> 0:19:01.240
<v Speaker 1>story had changed by the time of the second trial.

0:19:01.680 --> 0:19:04.119
<v Speaker 1>There she swore that the person she saw driving the

0:19:04.160 --> 0:19:07.520
<v Speaker 1>truck was not Emerson. Stevens when asked why she didn't

0:19:07.520 --> 0:19:10.639
<v Speaker 1>say that to the first jury, and answered because Detective

0:19:10.760 --> 0:19:14.200
<v Speaker 1>Riley told me not to. The other pickup truck witness,

0:19:14.280 --> 0:19:17.879
<v Speaker 1>Clyde Dunaway Well, turns out he came forward only after

0:19:17.960 --> 0:19:22.080
<v Speaker 1>police offered a twenty thousand dollars reward for information. He

0:19:22.200 --> 0:19:25.760
<v Speaker 1>asked Detective Riley about the money during their very first conversation,

0:19:26.320 --> 0:19:29.800
<v Speaker 1>but at Emerson's second trial, Dunaway swore he never asked

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:33.560
<v Speaker 1>anyone about the reward. Now Detective Riley was sitting in

0:19:33.640 --> 0:19:36.760
<v Speaker 1>the courtroom listening to this, he must have known Dunaway

0:19:36.880 --> 0:19:40.440
<v Speaker 1>was lying, but the detective never said a word. Eventually,

0:19:40.520 --> 0:19:43.600
<v Speaker 1>Dunaway paid a price for his false testimony in Emerson

0:19:43.640 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Stephens case. He ended up pleading guilty to obstruction of justice.

0:19:48.160 --> 0:19:52.239
<v Speaker 3>Once you dangle reward money, especially in a place like

0:19:52.359 --> 0:19:56.120
<v Speaker 3>Lancaster where there's a lot of people living very much

0:19:56.240 --> 0:20:00.400
<v Speaker 3>on a margin, the fact that Clyde Dunaway bit on that.

0:20:00.320 --> 0:20:01.800
<v Speaker 4>Is hardly surprising.

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:04.840
<v Speaker 3>He repeatedly inquired about when am I going to get

0:20:04.880 --> 0:20:07.920
<v Speaker 3>that money, and the detective would say, only after you testify.

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:11.480
<v Speaker 3>The upshot of the investigation is that Clyde Dunaway got

0:20:11.520 --> 0:20:15.119
<v Speaker 3>in trouble and our dirty detective, who sat on that

0:20:15.160 --> 0:20:18.320
<v Speaker 3>information during both trials, walked away unscathed.

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:20.760
<v Speaker 4>The little guy got it as usual.

0:20:21.440 --> 0:20:24.399
<v Speaker 1>Next up was the bizarre claim that Mary's bodies cinder

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:29.440
<v Speaker 1>block and all floated upstream ten miles. That marine scientist

0:20:29.480 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 1>who testified at the first trial, remember he was mia

0:20:32.960 --> 0:20:36.000
<v Speaker 1>at the second trial. Prosecutors had to read the jury

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:39.320
<v Speaker 1>a transcript of his previous testimony. Why didn't he show

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:42.440
<v Speaker 1>up the second time? Well, Emerson's lawyers found a letter

0:20:42.520 --> 0:20:45.399
<v Speaker 1>from the scientist to the prosecutor that provided a pretty

0:20:45.400 --> 0:20:49.680
<v Speaker 1>clear explanation. After the first trial, the scientist wrote, Lieutenant

0:20:49.800 --> 0:20:53.199
<v Speaker 1>Riley applied what maybe the correct term to my testimony

0:20:53.200 --> 0:20:57.760
<v Speaker 1>in this case. He called it eyewash. Eyewash is Virginia

0:20:57.840 --> 0:20:58.960
<v Speaker 1>slang for bullshit.

0:20:59.680 --> 0:21:04.720
<v Speaker 2>Ugh God, the marine scientist, it's clear that the science

0:21:05.080 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 2>that he put forth at this trial wasn't real. Even

0:21:08.560 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 2>Detective Riley called this theory eyewash.

0:21:13.520 --> 0:21:16.440
<v Speaker 3>Why a marine biologist went along with that the first time,

0:21:16.520 --> 0:21:19.240
<v Speaker 3>I have no idea, But by the second time he

0:21:19.480 --> 0:21:21.120
<v Speaker 3>clearly did not want.

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:22.400
<v Speaker 4>To do it and thought it was dirty.

0:21:22.720 --> 0:21:22.920
<v Speaker 5>Right.

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:25.639
<v Speaker 3>That's what his letter suggested, is you're asking me to

0:21:25.680 --> 0:21:27.240
<v Speaker 3>do something that's nonsensical.

0:21:27.720 --> 0:21:30.919
<v Speaker 1>Suddenly there was reason to believe that Detective Riley had

0:21:31.000 --> 0:21:33.679
<v Speaker 1>jinned up some of the evidence against Emerson, and it

0:21:33.760 --> 0:21:37.119
<v Speaker 1>seems that Riley tried to take it even further. The

0:21:37.160 --> 0:21:40.679
<v Speaker 1>owner of a Lancaster convenience store gave Emerson's lawyers a

0:21:40.760 --> 0:21:44.919
<v Speaker 1>sworn statement that reads as follows. Detective Riley tried to

0:21:44.920 --> 0:21:47.400
<v Speaker 1>get me to say that Emerson Stevens woke me up

0:21:47.440 --> 0:21:49.639
<v Speaker 1>in the middle of the night that Mary Harding disappeared

0:21:49.920 --> 0:21:53.360
<v Speaker 1>so that he could buy five gallons of gas. Detective

0:21:53.400 --> 0:21:57.520
<v Speaker 1>Riley was extremely aggressive and pushy insisting that I agree

0:21:57.520 --> 0:22:00.280
<v Speaker 1>with his story even though it was not true. Was

0:22:00.400 --> 0:22:02.080
<v Speaker 1>never woken up in the middle of the night by

0:22:02.080 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Emerson Stevens. Ever, for any.

0:22:04.400 --> 0:22:08.680
<v Speaker 2>Reason, none of these pieces are the puzzle actually fit together.

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:12.160
<v Speaker 2>They were all manipulated by this detective so that they

0:22:12.240 --> 0:22:16.160
<v Speaker 2>fit his theory that Emerson was guilty of this crime.

0:22:16.840 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 2>Now that's the eyewash.

0:22:18.680 --> 0:22:21.760
<v Speaker 1>The rest of the case crumbled too. Remember the theory

0:22:21.800 --> 0:22:25.439
<v Speaker 1>that Emerson used his knife to slash Mary's back. A

0:22:25.480 --> 0:22:28.760
<v Speaker 1>new assessment by the medical examiner showed that those evenly

0:22:28.800 --> 0:22:32.480
<v Speaker 1>spaced gashes were probably made by a boat propeller, not

0:22:32.600 --> 0:22:35.800
<v Speaker 1>by a human with a knife. And finally, what about

0:22:35.840 --> 0:22:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the hair from Emerson's truck. Back in nineteen eighty five,

0:22:38.720 --> 0:22:41.400
<v Speaker 1>the crime lab had put that hair under a microscope

0:22:41.680 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 1>and claimed that it was an exact match to Mary.

0:22:44.840 --> 0:22:48.679
<v Speaker 1>This technique, known as hair microscopy, has since been debunked.

0:22:49.160 --> 0:22:51.400
<v Speaker 1>There's no way you can match hairs with that level

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:54.240
<v Speaker 1>of certainty just by looking through a microscope. In fact,

0:22:54.320 --> 0:22:57.719
<v Speaker 1>more than seventy people have been exonerated after Bogus's hair

0:22:57.760 --> 0:23:00.520
<v Speaker 1>evidence was used to convict them.

0:23:00.680 --> 0:23:04.840
<v Speaker 3>There's just nothing to the science that you can microscopically

0:23:04.840 --> 0:23:09.040
<v Speaker 3>compare hairs and identify anybody. We've had cases where people

0:23:09.080 --> 0:23:11.200
<v Speaker 3>say that this is a human hair belonging to this victim,

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:14.720
<v Speaker 3>and it belongs to a dog. Even according to the FBI,

0:23:14.880 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 3>hair microscopy is junk science.

0:23:18.280 --> 0:23:22.119
<v Speaker 1>Decades later, Emerson's lawyers sought DNA testing, but it turned

0:23:22.119 --> 0:23:24.879
<v Speaker 1>out the hair was too old to test. In other words,

0:23:25.000 --> 0:23:27.720
<v Speaker 1>there's no way to know who it belonged to. It

0:23:27.720 --> 0:23:31.200
<v Speaker 1>could have been Mary's, or Emerson's, or Emerson's wife's, it

0:23:31.240 --> 0:23:44.040
<v Speaker 1>could have been anybody's. Armed with this new information, Emerson's

0:23:44.080 --> 0:23:47.840
<v Speaker 1>lawyers filed a post conviction petition in twenty sixteen asking

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:51.159
<v Speaker 1>for his conviction to be thrown out, but it hasn't

0:23:51.200 --> 0:23:54.520
<v Speaker 1>been yet. This is where Emerson's legal case has stalled.

0:23:55.000 --> 0:23:59.040
<v Speaker 1>Despite skilled lawyers and compelling evidence of innocence, The courts

0:23:59.080 --> 0:24:02.520
<v Speaker 1>have denied histition at every turn. But there has been

0:24:02.560 --> 0:24:08.080
<v Speaker 1>one important victory. On May nineteenth, twenty seventeen, Emerson Stevens

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:12.400
<v Speaker 1>was paroled from prison. He'd spent thirty one years behind bars.

0:24:12.680 --> 0:24:17.200
<v Speaker 3>His family filled the lobby of the correctional center, which

0:24:17.240 --> 0:24:22.000
<v Speaker 3>is almost always absolutely empty, and then we came with students.

0:24:22.240 --> 0:24:24.880
<v Speaker 3>And people who had been working on this case for years.

0:24:25.359 --> 0:24:28.040
<v Speaker 3>We all hopped into cars and we asked Emerson where

0:24:28.040 --> 0:24:29.880
<v Speaker 3>he would like to have his first free meal.

0:24:30.520 --> 0:24:33.040
<v Speaker 1>So what was the fisherman craving after more than three

0:24:33.119 --> 0:24:34.280
<v Speaker 1>decades of prison food.

0:24:34.520 --> 0:24:36.919
<v Speaker 3>Emerson very quickly told us that he wanted to go

0:24:36.960 --> 0:24:38.359
<v Speaker 3>to Cracker Barrel and he wanted the.

0:24:38.320 --> 0:24:40.919
<v Speaker 6>Seafood platter at Cracker Barrel. And I don't argue with

0:24:40.960 --> 0:24:42.199
<v Speaker 6>anyone who wants that.

0:24:45.520 --> 0:24:48.240
<v Speaker 1>Like a tide that might never come back in Emerson.

0:24:48.280 --> 0:24:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Stephen's life ebbed for thirty one years as he sat

0:24:51.240 --> 0:24:54.399
<v Speaker 1>behind bars. Now his life is flowing again.

0:24:55.520 --> 0:24:58.159
<v Speaker 6>You know, he's done such a great job of getting

0:24:58.200 --> 0:25:00.880
<v Speaker 6>out and just sort of sliding back in to his life,

0:25:01.200 --> 0:25:06.480
<v Speaker 6>moving back in, seeing family, going back to work immediately

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:10.600
<v Speaker 6>being a great worker. So in that part of his life,

0:25:10.600 --> 0:25:12.720
<v Speaker 6>he's done a really wonderful job.

0:25:13.280 --> 0:25:16.000
<v Speaker 1>But on the other hand, he's still a convicted murderer,

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:18.720
<v Speaker 1>and that burden weighs on him every day.

0:25:19.400 --> 0:25:23.160
<v Speaker 6>I think he feels that until he is cleared and

0:25:23.320 --> 0:25:26.240
<v Speaker 6>other people are exposed, his life is.

0:25:26.200 --> 0:25:29.919
<v Speaker 1>On hold until that happens. At least Emerson gets to

0:25:29.960 --> 0:25:33.119
<v Speaker 1>see his kids and his grandkids he's back out on

0:25:33.160 --> 0:25:36.200
<v Speaker 1>the water and his small aluminum boat, feeling the breeze

0:25:36.200 --> 0:25:36.800
<v Speaker 1>on his face.

0:25:37.280 --> 0:25:39.359
<v Speaker 3>I just said to him, the only thing you owe

0:25:39.359 --> 0:25:42.040
<v Speaker 3>me is a trip to go oystering, and he will

0:25:42.040 --> 0:25:42.520
<v Speaker 3>be good for that.

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:43.160
<v Speaker 4>I know it.

0:25:43.560 --> 0:25:47.000
<v Speaker 3>I've been to a Stephen's cookout, and you know what

0:25:47.080 --> 0:25:49.000
<v Speaker 3>they do is go crab and fish and come back

0:25:49.040 --> 0:25:50.879
<v Speaker 3>and cook it all up in the yard and have

0:25:51.040 --> 0:25:53.119
<v Speaker 3>huge tables of food and it's delicious.

0:25:53.800 --> 0:25:57.040
<v Speaker 1>The case against Emerson Stephens has taken years to unwind.

0:25:57.560 --> 0:26:01.439
<v Speaker 1>Sometimes fighting cases this thin can be rangely hard, almost

0:26:01.480 --> 0:26:02.959
<v Speaker 1>like you're shadow boxing a ghost.

0:26:03.400 --> 0:26:07.800
<v Speaker 2>Emerson should be pardoned, and Emerson's innocence needs to be

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:11.000
<v Speaker 2>recognized by the governor of the state of Virginia.

0:26:11.480 --> 0:26:14.120
<v Speaker 6>In cases like this, it's just never the slam dunk

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:18.399
<v Speaker 6>that it should be. We immediately applied for an absolute pardon,

0:26:18.440 --> 0:26:22.360
<v Speaker 6>which would exonerate him totally, and he pretty quickly got

0:26:22.400 --> 0:26:27.040
<v Speaker 6>a letter that said, thanks for your petition, we probably

0:26:27.080 --> 0:26:28.840
<v Speaker 6>won't be able to get to this for two years,

0:26:29.200 --> 0:26:32.359
<v Speaker 6>and don't bother us. In the meantime. For Emerson to

0:26:32.400 --> 0:26:36.639
<v Speaker 6>be pardoned would mean that he gets an absolute clean slate,

0:26:37.080 --> 0:26:41.080
<v Speaker 6>and it's a gateway to maybe proving what people did

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:44.440
<v Speaker 6>to get him convicted. For people like him, you need that,

0:26:44.760 --> 0:26:46.639
<v Speaker 6>you need the real story to be told.

0:26:47.320 --> 0:26:50.840
<v Speaker 1>For her part, Beverly Monroe, now in her eighties, still

0:26:50.880 --> 0:26:55.159
<v Speaker 1>supports Emerson, still talks to him regularly by phone, still

0:26:55.240 --> 0:26:58.879
<v Speaker 1>is waiting for the day he'll be exonerated. We're waiting

0:26:58.920 --> 0:27:03.359
<v Speaker 1>to Emerson, and we stand with you all the way.

0:27:08.840 --> 0:27:12.920
<v Speaker 1>Hey is this Emerson? Yes, yes, Hey Emerson, It's Laura

0:27:13.119 --> 0:27:14.359
<v Speaker 1>Ny writer and Steve Drisson.

0:27:14.400 --> 0:27:14.800
<v Speaker 4>How are you?

0:27:15.640 --> 0:27:16.920
<v Speaker 5>I'm doing good?

0:27:17.240 --> 0:27:19.080
<v Speaker 1>So tell me Emerson, what have you been doing these days?

0:27:19.080 --> 0:27:20.280
<v Speaker 1>How have you been keeping yourself busy?

0:27:21.280 --> 0:27:24.560
<v Speaker 5>Uh? Well, my oldest brother he asked me if I

0:27:24.600 --> 0:27:27.439
<v Speaker 5>would take his boat and get all this craft pops up.

0:27:27.520 --> 0:27:28.400
<v Speaker 5>So I did that.

0:27:28.440 --> 0:27:29.400
<v Speaker 1>You know, how was it?

0:27:29.760 --> 0:27:29.920
<v Speaker 5>Oh?

0:27:30.000 --> 0:27:30.680
<v Speaker 2>It felt great.

0:27:30.760 --> 0:27:33.159
<v Speaker 5>It felt great being abaccoat on the water again. And

0:27:33.840 --> 0:27:36.600
<v Speaker 5>then he wants me to go yestring with him.

0:27:36.640 --> 0:27:38.480
<v Speaker 2>You know, so I'm.

0:27:38.359 --> 0:27:41.600
<v Speaker 5>Thinking about it. I want to buy purchase a boat

0:27:41.640 --> 0:27:45.560
<v Speaker 5>of my own, you know, like my brothers got, and

0:27:45.840 --> 0:27:47.560
<v Speaker 5>be able to work on the water again.

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:50.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, what would you name your boat, Emerson?

0:27:51.960 --> 0:27:54.760
<v Speaker 5>Well, these type of boats you don't really put names

0:27:54.800 --> 0:27:57.800
<v Speaker 5>on them. But I don't know, misfit or something.

0:27:57.840 --> 0:28:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know. There's times that are enjoyable and wonderful,

0:28:03.560 --> 0:28:05.120
<v Speaker 1>you're with your family, you're back out on the water.

0:28:05.160 --> 0:28:06.800
<v Speaker 1>And there's times that are hard too, I'm sure.

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:10.280
<v Speaker 5>Oh yeah, yeah. I lost my oldest daughter when I

0:28:10.320 --> 0:28:13.520
<v Speaker 5>was in prison. She died at the age of forty,

0:28:13.840 --> 0:28:16.879
<v Speaker 5>and that broke my heart. It's not a day that

0:28:16.960 --> 0:28:20.080
<v Speaker 5>don't go by that I don't think about her.

0:28:20.119 --> 0:28:20.320
<v Speaker 2>You know.

0:28:21.160 --> 0:28:25.480
<v Speaker 1>I'm really sorry, Emerson. Yeah, yeah, Well, she's looking down

0:28:25.600 --> 0:28:28.520
<v Speaker 1>from somewhere, I hope, and rooting for you, just like

0:28:28.520 --> 0:28:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the rest of us.

0:28:29.080 --> 0:28:29.320
<v Speaker 5>Are.

0:28:31.280 --> 0:28:32.720
<v Speaker 1>Are you still in touch with Beverly?

0:28:33.480 --> 0:28:36.280
<v Speaker 5>Oh? Beverly, She's been my number one fan. You know,

0:28:36.520 --> 0:28:39.760
<v Speaker 5>She's always believed in me, and she's great. She's a

0:28:39.760 --> 0:28:42.680
<v Speaker 5>great person. Every now and then I tetch her or

0:28:42.960 --> 0:28:45.080
<v Speaker 5>call and talk to them, but she loves to talk now.

0:28:47.320 --> 0:28:48.000
<v Speaker 5>She loves to.

0:28:47.960 --> 0:28:58.440
<v Speaker 1>Talk to support Emerson Stevens. You can write the Governor

0:28:58.480 --> 0:29:01.959
<v Speaker 1>of Virginia and ask him to grant Emerson in absolute pardon.

0:29:02.400 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 1>You can find the address on my Instagram page at

0:29:05.080 --> 0:29:11.640
<v Speaker 1>Laura Nywriter. And that's the story of Emerson Stevens. Join

0:29:11.720 --> 0:29:14.160
<v Speaker 1>us next week when we tell you about a Philadelphia

0:29:14.160 --> 0:29:18.120
<v Speaker 1>man named Walter Ogrod. Walter spent decades on death row

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 1>until a new generation of prosecutors came to Philadelphia. They

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:29.760
<v Speaker 1>brought reform to the city and hope to Walter. Wrongful Conviction,

0:29:29.920 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 1>False Confessions is a production of Lava for Good Podcasts

0:29:33.640 --> 0:29:37.520
<v Speaker 1>in association with Signal Company Number one Special thanks to

0:29:37.520 --> 0:29:41.920
<v Speaker 1>our executive producers Jason Flamm and Kevin Wardis. Our production

0:29:42.040 --> 0:29:45.040
<v Speaker 1>team is headed by senior producer Ann Pope, along with

0:29:45.120 --> 0:29:48.440
<v Speaker 1>producers Joshi Hammer and Jess Shane. Our show is mixed

0:29:48.440 --> 0:29:52.560
<v Speaker 1>by Genie Montalvo. John Colbert is our intrepid intern. Our

0:29:52.640 --> 0:29:55.760
<v Speaker 1>music was composed by Jay Ralph. You can follow me

0:29:55.880 --> 0:29:59.120
<v Speaker 1>on Instagram or Twitter at Laura and Nywriter, and you

0:29:59.160 --> 0:29:59.960
<v Speaker 1>can follow.

0:29:59.640 --> 0:30:02.000
<v Speaker 2>Me on Twitter at Sdrizzen.

0:30:02.360 --> 0:30:06.479
<v Speaker 1>For more information on the show, visit wrongfulconvictionpodcast dot com.

0:30:06.880 --> 0:30:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Be sure to follow the show on Instagram at Wrongful Conviction,

0:30:10.800 --> 0:30:15.120
<v Speaker 1>on Facebook at Wrongful Conviction Podcast, and on Twitter at

0:30:15.200 --> 0:30:16.040
<v Speaker 1>wrong Conviction