WEBVTT - Do We Love or Hate The Internet? with Taylor Lorenz (Washington Post + Extremely Online)

0:00:04.080 --> 0:00:08.160
<v Speaker 1>Big things happen when you're pretty, pretty bold, pretty clever,

0:00:08.840 --> 0:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>pretty strong. I'm Danielle Robe, and each week my guests

0:00:12.360 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>and I have conversations that put a new spin on

0:00:15.320 --> 0:00:21.239
<v Speaker 1>pretty This is pretty smart. Have you ever noticed just

0:00:21.320 --> 0:00:25.680
<v Speaker 1>how conflicted our relationship with technology is. We are in

0:00:25.800 --> 0:00:29.360
<v Speaker 1>the ultimate love hate relationship when it comes to the

0:00:29.400 --> 0:00:33.640
<v Speaker 1>Internet and social media in particular. We just seem so torn.

0:00:34.400 --> 0:00:37.519
<v Speaker 1>We can't seem to decide if these advances divide us

0:00:38.120 --> 0:00:42.879
<v Speaker 1>or connect us. Are we getting smarter, more worldly, or

0:00:43.000 --> 0:00:47.199
<v Speaker 1>are our attention spans diminishing. Wherever you look, there's studies

0:00:47.200 --> 0:00:50.120
<v Speaker 1>to prove whatever theory you'd like to subscribe to. A

0:00:50.120 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 1>recent article in The Atlantic takes a look at how

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 1>the inability to stay logged off of social media can

0:00:56.840 --> 0:00:59.480
<v Speaker 1>best be compared to alcohol addiction, and.

0:00:59.600 --> 0:01:02.600
<v Speaker 2>It gives us more equal opportunity in what we do,

0:01:02.640 --> 0:01:05.759
<v Speaker 2>and that it enhances the way we think about things.

0:01:06.520 --> 0:01:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Were skeptics and addicts, and with all the research into

0:01:11.040 --> 0:01:14.440
<v Speaker 1>social media and the impact on our mental health, we

0:01:14.560 --> 0:01:18.000
<v Speaker 1>all forget that the internet can be a really fun

0:01:18.040 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 1>and joyful place. Our guest today, Taylor Lorenz, has core

0:01:26.120 --> 0:01:29.680
<v Speaker 1>memories of the Internet's early days. Taylor is unique in

0:01:29.720 --> 0:01:32.840
<v Speaker 1>that she saw the power of the Internet and technology

0:01:33.360 --> 0:01:36.200
<v Speaker 1>far ahead of some of her bosses and colleagues. She

0:01:36.360 --> 0:01:39.800
<v Speaker 1>was covering internet culture early on, So it would make

0:01:39.840 --> 0:01:43.280
<v Speaker 1>sense that the title of her book is extremely Online

0:01:43.800 --> 0:01:46.040
<v Speaker 1>in the way that Taylor was a pioneer in wanting

0:01:46.080 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 1>to cover the Internet, and she reminded me that women

0:01:49.680 --> 0:01:53.320
<v Speaker 1>were pioneers when it came to creating it and harnessing

0:01:53.400 --> 0:01:53.920
<v Speaker 1>its power.

0:01:54.480 --> 0:01:57.360
<v Speaker 3>Some women were taught to be the earliest computer programmers. Actually,

0:01:57.400 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 3>people don't know that because it was considered this easy

0:02:00.120 --> 0:02:01.920
<v Speaker 3>job for women to do. You could train them up

0:02:01.960 --> 0:02:05.120
<v Speaker 3>in computer programming. Then it turned into this male dominated

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:07.840
<v Speaker 3>tech industry. Really when Silicon Valley took hold in the

0:02:07.880 --> 0:02:10.760
<v Speaker 3>eighties and really the nineties was like the boom of

0:02:10.800 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 3>Silicon Valley.

0:02:12.000 --> 0:02:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Her book and our conversation today is all about the

0:02:15.639 --> 0:02:20.560
<v Speaker 1>history of the Internet, social media, and influencer culture, from

0:02:20.560 --> 0:02:25.360
<v Speaker 1>its humble beginnings to ridiculous controversies. Taylor has watched it

0:02:25.400 --> 0:02:27.640
<v Speaker 1>all and she's been taking notes.

0:02:28.360 --> 0:02:31.080
<v Speaker 3>The concept of online influence has migrated just from fashion

0:02:31.120 --> 0:02:34.840
<v Speaker 3>and beauty to politics, to business to everything.

0:02:35.400 --> 0:02:37.360
<v Speaker 1>We have an expert with us, so I had to

0:02:37.400 --> 0:02:40.359
<v Speaker 1>ask all the things I was curious about, from why

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:41.720
<v Speaker 1>TikTok gets a bad rap.

0:02:41.840 --> 0:02:44.120
<v Speaker 3>It's not social media that's making us dumber. TikTok is

0:02:44.160 --> 0:02:47.560
<v Speaker 3>informing us about the world like we are gathering information.

0:02:47.600 --> 0:02:50.840
<v Speaker 3>I would say TikTok is making us smarter than you

0:02:50.919 --> 0:02:52.960
<v Speaker 3>know a lot on Instagram.

0:02:52.520 --> 0:02:55.680
<v Speaker 1>To why being an influencer isn't all that easy.

0:02:55.919 --> 0:02:59.640
<v Speaker 3>Being a content creator is so much work and productizing

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:02.480
<v Speaker 3>yourself build I mean, you're building your own media company.

0:03:02.680 --> 0:03:06.320
<v Speaker 3>They're laughed at because they're conventionally attractive, beautiful women and

0:03:06.800 --> 0:03:09.880
<v Speaker 3>businessmen or whatever don't take them seriously, and tech reporters

0:03:09.919 --> 0:03:10.880
<v Speaker 3>don't take them seriously.

0:03:11.480 --> 0:03:13.880
<v Speaker 1>And how about Taylor's own experience online.

0:03:14.160 --> 0:03:16.640
<v Speaker 3>It's a very hard industry to operate it, and so

0:03:16.680 --> 0:03:18.919
<v Speaker 3>I've gotten a lot of hate. It was really hard

0:03:18.919 --> 0:03:21.560
<v Speaker 3>for me. I felt very alone, and I cannot think

0:03:21.600 --> 0:03:25.079
<v Speaker 3>of another female tech reporter that's sort of operating at

0:03:25.080 --> 0:03:26.640
<v Speaker 3>the level that I've been operating at.

0:03:26.800 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 1>I followed Taylor's work for a long time. I've always

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:35.720
<v Speaker 1>admired how creative and inventive she is. She's forged her

0:03:35.720 --> 0:03:40.800
<v Speaker 1>own path within legacy institutions. That is not an easy

0:03:40.840 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 1>thing to do. It was really fun for me to

0:03:44.000 --> 0:03:48.240
<v Speaker 1>finally meet the person whose work I've followed for so long.

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:51.800
<v Speaker 1>I hope you enjoy listening to this conversation as much

0:03:51.840 --> 0:03:57.600
<v Speaker 1>as I enjoyed having it so Taylor. Your book is

0:03:57.680 --> 0:04:00.520
<v Speaker 1>titled extremely Online, and I've been hearing that more and

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:03.520
<v Speaker 1>more these days. It's sort of internet slang. I guess, now,

0:04:03.600 --> 0:04:05.320
<v Speaker 1>what does it mean to be extremely online?

0:04:05.880 --> 0:04:08.320
<v Speaker 3>Good question. I feel like we are all sort of

0:04:08.480 --> 0:04:11.800
<v Speaker 3>increasingly extremely online. It just means being more and more

0:04:11.920 --> 0:04:15.880
<v Speaker 3>plugged into digital culture and also just the Internet playing

0:04:15.880 --> 0:04:18.400
<v Speaker 3>a bigger and bigger role in everyone's lives. When I

0:04:18.440 --> 0:04:21.159
<v Speaker 3>started out on this beat back in two thousand and nine,

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:23.120
<v Speaker 3>you know, it was very much this concept of like

0:04:23.200 --> 0:04:27.080
<v Speaker 3>logging on and oh like things happening online. And now

0:04:27.560 --> 0:04:31.320
<v Speaker 3>Internet culture is just culture, and you know, the Internet

0:04:31.320 --> 0:04:33.040
<v Speaker 3>just plays a bigger and bigger role in every single

0:04:33.080 --> 0:04:39.000
<v Speaker 3>aspect of our society, from economy, politics, you know, culture, music, fashion,

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:40.719
<v Speaker 3>it's all shaped by the Internet.

0:04:41.080 --> 0:04:44.000
<v Speaker 1>I like that you mentioned your beat because I think

0:04:44.040 --> 0:04:48.960
<v Speaker 1>I've probably been following you since you started reporting on

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:53.040
<v Speaker 1>digital culture and Internet trends. It's been thirteen years now. Yeah.

0:04:53.240 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, well, you know you're not I mean, it's weird

0:04:57.560 --> 0:04:59.599
<v Speaker 2>because those of us that grew up on the Internet

0:04:59.640 --> 0:05:02.560
<v Speaker 2>are not, I think, starting to feel like we're in

0:05:02.600 --> 0:05:04.320
<v Speaker 2>a different age bracket.

0:05:04.520 --> 0:05:07.560
<v Speaker 1>So it's interesting what being online means now. But I

0:05:07.560 --> 0:05:11.920
<v Speaker 1>think it's so interesting that you report about the Internet

0:05:11.960 --> 0:05:14.599
<v Speaker 1>on the Internet and when you started, this was not

0:05:14.720 --> 0:05:17.040
<v Speaker 1>a beat. You really sort of invented it. How did

0:05:17.080 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 1>it come about?

0:05:18.560 --> 0:05:21.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? Well, so when I started, I started as a

0:05:21.480 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 3>blogger back in sort of the heyday of blogging, and

0:05:25.360 --> 0:05:28.839
<v Speaker 3>I really felt like people weren't writing about the Internet

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:31.479
<v Speaker 3>as a user. It was more like these sort of

0:05:31.720 --> 0:05:36.640
<v Speaker 3>boomer type people at legacy mainstream publications that had sort

0:05:36.680 --> 0:05:39.120
<v Speaker 3>of never really used social media before, but they were

0:05:39.160 --> 0:05:41.360
<v Speaker 3>writing about social media as if they knew what was

0:05:41.400 --> 0:05:43.720
<v Speaker 3>going on, and a lot of it was really condescending.

0:05:44.160 --> 0:05:46.880
<v Speaker 3>It was really out of touch. I think the media

0:05:46.920 --> 0:05:49.320
<v Speaker 3>still had this problem, and so I wanted to write

0:05:49.320 --> 0:05:51.320
<v Speaker 3>about social media sort of as a user. At that

0:05:51.560 --> 0:05:53.840
<v Speaker 3>time when I was coming up there, it was this

0:05:53.920 --> 0:05:56.120
<v Speaker 3>like heyday of gadget blogging, and so there were all

0:05:56.160 --> 0:06:00.520
<v Speaker 3>these people that were blogging who actually used the products

0:06:00.560 --> 0:06:03.880
<v Speaker 3>like the new iPhone or the new Mac computer or whatever,

0:06:03.920 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 3>but they would write about it from the perspective of

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:08.080
<v Speaker 3>people that had used it, and so I thought I

0:06:08.120 --> 0:06:10.880
<v Speaker 3>would do that, but for social media, you know, just

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:14.120
<v Speaker 3>try and write about things happening online from the user side.

0:06:14.279 --> 0:06:16.680
<v Speaker 1>I think I always gravitated towards you because of that,

0:06:16.720 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 1>because there also you were really like the only woman

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:22.840
<v Speaker 1>that I saw doing it, and you were writing about

0:06:22.880 --> 0:06:25.960
<v Speaker 1>the Internet that I was growing up with. You weren't

0:06:26.000 --> 0:06:29.080
<v Speaker 1>writing about necessary. I mean sometimes you would, but a

0:06:29.120 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 1>lot of these male tech reporters as they were called,

0:06:32.720 --> 0:06:36.279
<v Speaker 1>were writing like reviews on the new iPhone, and that's

0:06:36.320 --> 0:06:38.880
<v Speaker 1>not the Internet that I was interested in necessarily.

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:42.160
<v Speaker 3>I feel the exact same way. I feel like there's

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:45.920
<v Speaker 3>this thing in tech. It's such a male dominated field,

0:06:46.000 --> 0:06:49.200
<v Speaker 3>and there's this obsession with like hardware and you know,

0:06:49.360 --> 0:06:51.360
<v Speaker 3>tough like things, and look, you know, I went back

0:06:51.400 --> 0:06:53.960
<v Speaker 3>to school, I learned how to code, I learned web development.

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:58.080
<v Speaker 3>I'm into that technical side of things. But yeah, I'm

0:06:58.160 --> 0:06:58.359
<v Speaker 3>got a.

0:06:58.360 --> 0:06:59.840
<v Speaker 1>Little known fact by out.

0:07:00.120 --> 0:07:02.760
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, I love technology and I'm interested in

0:07:02.760 --> 0:07:05.600
<v Speaker 3>that side of things. But I think what makes you know,

0:07:06.120 --> 0:07:08.080
<v Speaker 3>writing about it interesting to me is more like the

0:07:08.120 --> 0:07:11.559
<v Speaker 3>cultural impact and how it's shaping you know, our lives,

0:07:11.600 --> 0:07:14.040
<v Speaker 3>and especially the content creator industry. Like one thing that

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:16.960
<v Speaker 3>I noticed really early on covering these platforms, it's just

0:07:16.960 --> 0:07:20.720
<v Speaker 3>that there were these people with massive audiences wielding a

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:23.920
<v Speaker 3>huge amount of influence and shaping the products, and these

0:07:23.920 --> 0:07:26.240
<v Speaker 3>people were totally ignored by Silicon Valley. A lot of

0:07:26.280 --> 0:07:28.320
<v Speaker 3>them were women. It was a lot of you know,

0:07:28.400 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 3>mommy bloggers, fashion bloggers, lifestyle bloggers. I mean it started

0:07:32.400 --> 0:07:35.200
<v Speaker 3>with blogging that all emerged on Pinterest, Instagram, all these platforms.

0:07:35.200 --> 0:07:37.520
<v Speaker 3>But I think because it was sort of seen as

0:07:37.560 --> 0:07:42.200
<v Speaker 3>this like female coded industry, the male tech reporters didn't

0:07:42.240 --> 0:07:44.520
<v Speaker 3>take it seriously or touch it or cover any of it.

0:07:45.000 --> 0:07:48.720
<v Speaker 3>And I thought, well, I'll do it, then I'll cover

0:07:48.800 --> 0:07:51.840
<v Speaker 3>all of that. I love that stuff and it's fascinating,

0:07:51.880 --> 0:07:54.160
<v Speaker 3>and again it has real tech impacts. I mean, look

0:07:54.160 --> 0:07:56.440
<v Speaker 3>at the way that now Silicon Valley vcs talk about

0:07:56.440 --> 0:07:59.320
<v Speaker 3>people like mister Beast, you know, like how he's a

0:07:59.360 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 3>productized himself and oh he's launching products. He's not just

0:08:02.320 --> 0:08:06.280
<v Speaker 3>an influencer. Beauty YouTubers were doing that, you know, twelve

0:08:06.400 --> 0:08:09.520
<v Speaker 3>years ago. They were launching their own makeup lines and palettes,

0:08:09.520 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 3>and people like Michelle von and Ingrid Nielsen, and so yeah,

0:08:13.560 --> 0:08:15.080
<v Speaker 3>I just wanted to kind of set the record straight

0:08:15.120 --> 0:08:17.080
<v Speaker 3>with my book too, of like how this whole thing

0:08:17.160 --> 0:08:20.080
<v Speaker 3>came to be and the role that influential users and

0:08:20.160 --> 0:08:21.360
<v Speaker 3>especially women played in it.

0:08:22.200 --> 0:08:25.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't see you tweeting, because tweeting is, you know,

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>controversial now, but I used to see you tweeting a

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:33.080
<v Speaker 1>lot about the bullying and harassment you received. A lot

0:08:33.080 --> 0:08:36.400
<v Speaker 1>of it was very gendered. I don't see you talking

0:08:36.440 --> 0:08:38.480
<v Speaker 1>about that as much as it still is prevalent, and

0:08:38.520 --> 0:08:42.280
<v Speaker 1>you're just bored of discussing it or what's happening sort

0:08:42.320 --> 0:08:43.280
<v Speaker 1>of behind the scenes for you.

0:08:43.880 --> 0:08:47.480
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it got really crazy in twenty twenty and twenty

0:08:47.520 --> 0:08:50.120
<v Speaker 3>twenty one, especially at the time I was working at

0:08:50.120 --> 0:08:52.959
<v Speaker 3>The New York Times, which I loved my editor. I

0:08:53.000 --> 0:08:55.040
<v Speaker 3>would dive for my editor there. She was amazing, and

0:08:55.080 --> 0:08:57.720
<v Speaker 3>I loved my team. But I think structurally that company

0:08:57.800 --> 0:09:00.880
<v Speaker 3>was not really set up to deal with the level

0:09:01.040 --> 0:09:03.240
<v Speaker 3>of harassment I got. That's not a knock on them,

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:05.840
<v Speaker 3>They just didn't They weren't prepared for it, you know.

0:09:05.880 --> 0:09:07.920
<v Speaker 3>I think that now all these news organizations are sort

0:09:07.960 --> 0:09:09.720
<v Speaker 3>of learning how to deal with you know, when your

0:09:09.800 --> 0:09:12.719
<v Speaker 3>reporter is getting thousands and thousands of death threats a

0:09:12.800 --> 0:09:14.800
<v Speaker 3>day or all of this horrible stuff. Er they're targeting

0:09:14.800 --> 0:09:17.280
<v Speaker 3>her family, Like how do we respond to that? So

0:09:17.320 --> 0:09:19.080
<v Speaker 3>it was really hard for me. I felt very alone,

0:09:19.200 --> 0:09:21.520
<v Speaker 3>and I was on Twitter more sort of talking about it.

0:09:21.559 --> 0:09:24.520
<v Speaker 3>But it's been hard. I mean, I operate in a

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 3>very male world. I cannot think of another female tech

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:31.600
<v Speaker 3>reporter that's sort of operating at the level that I've

0:09:31.600 --> 0:09:34.280
<v Speaker 3>been operating at other than Kara Swisher, who's a woman

0:09:34.840 --> 0:09:37.600
<v Speaker 3>in her sixties, and it's sort of from a different generation.

0:09:37.679 --> 0:09:39.280
<v Speaker 3>She came up in a different time when there wasn't

0:09:39.320 --> 0:09:41.600
<v Speaker 3>this twenty four to seven or feedback on the Internet

0:09:41.640 --> 0:09:44.520
<v Speaker 3>and scrutiny. And she's also a lesbian and doesn't present

0:09:44.600 --> 0:09:46.640
<v Speaker 3>as feminine as me, and I think that there's just

0:09:46.679 --> 0:09:49.200
<v Speaker 3>a sort of a difference in how we're perceived. I

0:09:49.280 --> 0:09:52.320
<v Speaker 3>cannot think of a feminine presenting tech reporter that really

0:09:52.920 --> 0:09:56.600
<v Speaker 3>has risen the ranks to that level. It's a very

0:09:56.640 --> 0:09:59.160
<v Speaker 3>hard industry to operate it, and so I've gotten a

0:09:59.160 --> 0:10:02.280
<v Speaker 3>lot of hate. When I first started reporting on influencers

0:10:02.440 --> 0:10:04.120
<v Speaker 3>and I was reporting on big things, you know, it

0:10:04.160 --> 0:10:06.080
<v Speaker 3>was like the way that these influencers were actually like

0:10:06.520 --> 0:10:08.920
<v Speaker 3>they you know, had sold so much product for instance,

0:10:08.960 --> 0:10:12.600
<v Speaker 3>that Instagram had to redo, you know, a feature or whatever.

0:10:12.679 --> 0:10:14.360
<v Speaker 3>Like there was all these impacts that were having on

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:15.959
<v Speaker 3>the tech world. But when I tried to call myself

0:10:16.000 --> 0:10:19.600
<v Speaker 3>a tech reporter, these men in the industry freaked out.

0:10:19.640 --> 0:10:21.679
<v Speaker 3>They were like, well, you're not reviewing iPhones or you're

0:10:21.679 --> 0:10:24.720
<v Speaker 3>not writing about Microsoft's latest earnings. You can't call yourself

0:10:24.760 --> 0:10:25.400
<v Speaker 3>a tech reporter.

0:10:26.200 --> 0:10:27.960
<v Speaker 1>You feel respected now?

0:10:28.480 --> 0:10:30.319
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, now I think I got the last laugh. I

0:10:30.360 --> 0:10:32.360
<v Speaker 3>mean this is we know that the influencer industry is

0:10:32.400 --> 0:10:34.640
<v Speaker 3>about to be a half a trillion dollar industry. The

0:10:34.679 --> 0:10:37.360
<v Speaker 3>concept of online influence has migrated just from fashion and

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 3>beauty to politics, to business to everything. So I feel

0:10:42.400 --> 0:10:44.600
<v Speaker 3>fine about my life now. But I used to talk

0:10:44.600 --> 0:10:46.320
<v Speaker 3>about it more because I think it was really I

0:10:46.480 --> 0:10:48.720
<v Speaker 3>was really sort of like fighting to take up space.

0:10:49.440 --> 0:10:51.400
<v Speaker 1>I get why you were talking. I actually think it

0:10:51.800 --> 0:10:53.920
<v Speaker 1>was helpful that you were talking about it because people

0:10:54.640 --> 0:10:57.800
<v Speaker 1>were people that were going through similar things in different industries,

0:10:57.880 --> 0:11:02.160
<v Speaker 1>probably related, and people who warrant got an inside look

0:11:02.240 --> 0:11:05.280
<v Speaker 1>into what that was like. I mean it was the

0:11:05.320 --> 0:11:07.000
<v Speaker 1>things you would post were horrifying.

0:11:07.880 --> 0:11:09.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, it was bad. It was really bad.

0:11:09.880 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't have like the breath of understanding to speak

0:11:13.160 --> 0:11:16.480
<v Speaker 1>about this that well, but I do know just from

0:11:16.480 --> 0:11:20.000
<v Speaker 1>my own experience that when you are a woman on

0:11:20.040 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the Internet, the sort of mean tweets that you get

0:11:23.040 --> 0:11:26.320
<v Speaker 1>are usually really scary because a lot of them have

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:29.320
<v Speaker 1>to do with like harming you, and so that's and

0:11:29.360 --> 0:11:31.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe like you're saying, harming your loved ones. So that's

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:31.640
<v Speaker 1>what's scary.

0:11:32.200 --> 0:11:35.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, And there's a gendered like there's this like gendered

0:11:35.480 --> 0:11:37.920
<v Speaker 3>nature to it too, like yeah, I mean, one thing

0:11:37.960 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 3>that I constantly get is like told now that I'm

0:11:40.280 --> 0:11:43.040
<v Speaker 3>in my thirties that I'm too old to write about tech.

0:11:43.440 --> 0:11:45.880
<v Speaker 3>And it's so funny because throughout my entire twenties, when

0:11:45.920 --> 0:11:47.679
<v Speaker 3>I was like building this career for myself, they were

0:11:47.720 --> 0:11:50.280
<v Speaker 3>like this silly little girl. I mean, Tucker Carlson was saying, like,

0:11:50.320 --> 0:11:52.440
<v Speaker 3>I'm too, I'm younger than everyone else at the New

0:11:52.520 --> 0:11:54.520
<v Speaker 3>York Times, And how did I even get this job.

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 3>I'm such a young, unqualified girl. Then you turn thirty

0:11:57.760 --> 0:12:00.400
<v Speaker 3>and now as I'm too old. Meanwhile, Walt Mosburg icond

0:12:00.440 --> 0:12:02.160
<v Speaker 3>of the industry. But you know, there's all these other

0:12:02.200 --> 0:12:05.720
<v Speaker 3>tech colonist men. Yeah, they're in their forties and sixties,

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:08.280
<v Speaker 3>and no one would ever say that. So it's women

0:12:08.360 --> 0:12:11.760
<v Speaker 3>are subject to a very different you know, and this

0:12:11.800 --> 0:12:13.520
<v Speaker 3>is true in every industry. You're held to a completely

0:12:13.559 --> 0:12:14.280
<v Speaker 3>different standard.

0:12:15.320 --> 0:12:18.320
<v Speaker 1>So your book sort of paints this overview of social

0:12:18.360 --> 0:12:20.920
<v Speaker 1>media and the Internet in a way I hadn't heard

0:12:20.920 --> 0:12:23.560
<v Speaker 1>told before. This is going to sound like probably the

0:12:23.559 --> 0:12:26.560
<v Speaker 1>most ridiculous question that you will ever get in an interview,

0:12:26.960 --> 0:12:29.880
<v Speaker 1>But just so we can start baseline, how did the

0:12:29.880 --> 0:12:30.640
<v Speaker 1>internet start?

0:12:32.120 --> 0:12:34.920
<v Speaker 3>Oh my god, good question. It started way back, you know,

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:37.880
<v Speaker 3>in like the sixties and sort of emerge in the seventies.

0:12:37.880 --> 0:12:40.679
<v Speaker 3>I'm sure you guys have seen those like giant you know,

0:12:40.800 --> 0:12:42.840
<v Speaker 3>computers that like took up the size of a room.

0:12:42.880 --> 0:12:44.800
<v Speaker 3>And it actually started with women. I mean some women

0:12:44.840 --> 0:12:47.480
<v Speaker 3>were taught to be the earliest computer programmers. Actually, people

0:12:47.480 --> 0:12:50.120
<v Speaker 3>don't know that because it was considered this easy job

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:51.839
<v Speaker 3>for women to do. You could train them up in

0:12:51.880 --> 0:12:55.120
<v Speaker 3>computer programming. That's yeah, that's why some of the first

0:12:55.160 --> 0:12:58.480
<v Speaker 3>and most famous early computer programmers were women. Then it

0:12:58.559 --> 0:13:01.760
<v Speaker 3>turned into this male dominated heech industry. Really when Silicon

0:13:01.840 --> 0:13:04.480
<v Speaker 3>Valley took hold in the eighties, and really the nineties

0:13:04.600 --> 0:13:07.000
<v Speaker 3>was like the boom of Silicon Valley and you saw

0:13:07.040 --> 0:13:12.680
<v Speaker 3>these corporate you know, companies like behemoths submerge. My interest

0:13:12.679 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 3>in the Internet sort of started in the late nineties

0:13:15.760 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 3>as a millennial. I mean obviously I had like aim,

0:13:18.000 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 3>I had Facebook in college, but it wasn't really until

0:13:20.240 --> 0:13:22.320
<v Speaker 3>that sort of like social part of the Internet took

0:13:22.320 --> 0:13:24.680
<v Speaker 3>off that I really started to fall in love with it,

0:13:24.679 --> 0:13:26.559
<v Speaker 3>which was really kind of that turn. It's really when

0:13:26.559 --> 0:13:30.239
<v Speaker 3>my book begins, it's like the year two thousand, I am.

0:13:31.240 --> 0:13:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Isn't that when like everybody thinks Al Gore started the Internet?

0:13:34.360 --> 0:13:38.160
<v Speaker 3>Yeah? Yeah, yeah, you remember.

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:42.360
<v Speaker 1>So what is a digital reporter? And I would say

0:13:42.400 --> 0:13:45.880
<v Speaker 1>digital culture reporters daily relationship with the Internet, like like

0:13:46.000 --> 0:13:50.119
<v Speaker 1>paint me sort of a picture of your social media routine.

0:13:50.280 --> 0:13:52.920
<v Speaker 3>Oh god, it's slightly horrifying. I don't like to look

0:13:52.920 --> 0:13:55.079
<v Speaker 3>at my screen time too much because I am online

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:57.680
<v Speaker 3>kind of from start to finish.

0:13:57.840 --> 0:14:00.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I mean, I wait, going online.

0:14:00.000 --> 0:14:02.280
<v Speaker 3>Extremely online, But that's okay. I love I mean, it's

0:14:02.280 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 3>such a dream job for me, and I do have

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:07.440
<v Speaker 3>a lot of hard boundaries as well. But I wake up,

0:14:07.600 --> 0:14:11.480
<v Speaker 3>I immediately roll over took my phone and after checking

0:14:11.480 --> 0:14:13.400
<v Speaker 3>sort of Slack and email and stuff, I just dive

0:14:13.440 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 3>in and see what people are talking about online. I

0:14:15.800 --> 0:14:18.200
<v Speaker 3>live in LA so by the time I get up

0:14:18.200 --> 0:14:20.880
<v Speaker 3>around six or seven, you know New York has already

0:14:20.920 --> 0:14:23.960
<v Speaker 3>been up for a few hours in the UK, so

0:14:24.800 --> 0:14:26.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, you sort of get a sense of what's trending,

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:29.880
<v Speaker 3>what people are talking about. And my day is a

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:32.560
<v Speaker 3>mix of meeting people in person, interviewing. I do a

0:14:32.560 --> 0:14:34.760
<v Speaker 3>lot of video stuff. I do TV hits, I do

0:14:35.360 --> 0:14:37.760
<v Speaker 3>podcasts like this, and then I'm writing in between all

0:14:37.800 --> 0:14:40.520
<v Speaker 3>of that, and I just kind of dip in and

0:14:40.560 --> 0:14:43.040
<v Speaker 3>out all throughout the day. But I'm online twenty four

0:14:43.080 --> 0:14:44.760
<v Speaker 3>to seven. I don't have a huge boundary of like

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 3>work hours, just because the Internet, everything happens at any time,

0:14:48.760 --> 0:14:52.400
<v Speaker 3>So I kind of every day is a mix of

0:14:52.480 --> 0:14:53.360
<v Speaker 3>all of that stuff.

0:14:53.960 --> 0:14:55.920
<v Speaker 1>I always say my days are like fire drills. It

0:14:55.920 --> 0:14:57.360
<v Speaker 1>sounds like yours are the same way.

0:14:57.520 --> 0:14:59.600
<v Speaker 3>Yes, that's such a good way to put it. I

0:14:59.600 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 3>feel this same way.

0:15:00.680 --> 0:15:04.400
<v Speaker 1>So when I first moved to LA in twenty thirteen,

0:15:04.840 --> 0:15:07.280
<v Speaker 1>my first real job was at this place called Clever TV,

0:15:07.440 --> 0:15:11.560
<v Speaker 1>which was under defined. Yeah, and for anybody who doesn't know.

0:15:11.600 --> 0:15:14.440
<v Speaker 1>It was sort of this YouTube conglomerate. They housed like

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:17.800
<v Speaker 1>ten of the largest YouTube channels with smash games and

0:15:17.840 --> 0:15:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Clever was their entertainment outlet. And that's where I first

0:15:21.400 --> 0:15:24.200
<v Speaker 1>really learned the Internet. I didn't know. I had always

0:15:24.240 --> 0:15:28.480
<v Speaker 1>been like a user for fun and this was a job.

0:15:28.560 --> 0:15:33.480
<v Speaker 1>And I learned about SEO and strategy and content creation

0:15:33.680 --> 0:15:36.200
<v Speaker 1>and the whole thing. And I learned that there was

0:15:36.240 --> 0:15:38.240
<v Speaker 1>an entire vocabulary to the Internet.

0:15:38.680 --> 0:15:39.040
<v Speaker 3>It is.

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:42.160
<v Speaker 1>Some people say the Internet is culture. I think it's

0:15:42.200 --> 0:15:44.920
<v Speaker 1>still a subculture because there's so many subcultures that make

0:15:45.040 --> 0:15:49.040
<v Speaker 1>up our culture. Do you remember the exact moment when

0:15:49.120 --> 0:15:53.040
<v Speaker 1>it became abundantly clear to you that the Internet had

0:15:53.080 --> 0:15:53.840
<v Speaker 1>its own culture.

0:15:55.400 --> 0:15:58.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I mean, I guess I always thought of the

0:15:58.880 --> 0:16:01.080
<v Speaker 3>Internet as a separate sort of thing, like it was

0:16:01.080 --> 0:16:04.000
<v Speaker 3>really my Space era. I just remember a lot of

0:16:04.040 --> 0:16:06.600
<v Speaker 3>people at my school had MySpace. It was really kind

0:16:06.600 --> 0:16:08.640
<v Speaker 3>of those early two thousands when I started to really

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 3>notice this like MySpace culture or that like emo culture,

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:13.600
<v Speaker 3>and although I was definitely not part of it, it

0:16:13.680 --> 0:16:15.880
<v Speaker 3>kind of just it was this like thing that I

0:16:15.920 --> 0:16:19.840
<v Speaker 3>became aware of that, like things were happening online and what.

0:16:19.680 --> 0:16:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Were you blogging about?

0:16:21.360 --> 0:16:25.040
<v Speaker 3>So I started blogging more like later after that, Like

0:16:25.080 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 3>I would say, if that was sort of like two

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:28.000
<v Speaker 3>thousand and four to two thousand and six. I started

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:30.600
<v Speaker 3>blogging really seriously in two thousand and nine when I

0:16:30.600 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 3>got Tumblr. But Tumblr had all this social functionality. I

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 3>would just go through and like and engage with everyone

0:16:36.800 --> 0:16:39.960
<v Speaker 3>that I saw on Tumblr, and I started to get followers,

0:16:40.000 --> 0:16:41.640
<v Speaker 3>and I started to get people who knew who I was.

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:44.280
<v Speaker 3>But it was that social aspect that I really liked.

0:16:44.520 --> 0:16:46.240
<v Speaker 1>I was going to say, what were you getting from it?

0:16:46.280 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 1>Did you feel like you were making friends? Did you

0:16:48.160 --> 0:16:51.200
<v Speaker 1>feel like did you have friends at school and then

0:16:51.240 --> 0:16:54.200
<v Speaker 1>felt like this was a separate life or yeah.

0:16:54.280 --> 0:16:57.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean I had a really hard time in school academically,

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 3>and so I had transferred through many school I had

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:03.680
<v Speaker 3>really hard time. I was always really good at making friends,

0:17:03.680 --> 0:17:05.240
<v Speaker 3>but school wise, I had a hard time, and I

0:17:05.280 --> 0:17:06.720
<v Speaker 3>never felt like I fit in. So I think I

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:09.760
<v Speaker 3>would be sort of a chameleon and just like adjust

0:17:09.800 --> 0:17:12.800
<v Speaker 3>to these expectations of myself that were sort of like

0:17:14.119 --> 0:17:16.879
<v Speaker 3>very rigid. And when I got on Tumblr, I was like,

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:18.359
<v Speaker 3>oh my god, there's all these people that are just

0:17:18.400 --> 0:17:21.000
<v Speaker 3>not buying into this, you know, Like I mean, I

0:17:21.000 --> 0:17:23.399
<v Speaker 3>think as a girl in the mid two thousands, like

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:27.080
<v Speaker 3>there was this obsession with being thin and beautiful and

0:17:27.119 --> 0:17:29.640
<v Speaker 3>sort of meeting these beauty standards. And I remember being

0:17:29.640 --> 0:17:31.800
<v Speaker 3>on Tumblr and seeing that was the first time I

0:17:31.800 --> 0:17:36.080
<v Speaker 3>had seen a fat person post a picture of themselves

0:17:36.080 --> 0:17:38.560
<v Speaker 3>in a bikini and not like I remember seeing that

0:17:38.600 --> 0:17:40.119
<v Speaker 3>and being like, oh my god, I can't believe this

0:17:40.119 --> 0:17:42.959
<v Speaker 3>girl put this on the Internet. And there were so

0:17:43.040 --> 0:17:44.880
<v Speaker 3>many things like that, just like not just the body

0:17:44.920 --> 0:17:47.760
<v Speaker 3>positivity movement, but it exposed me to like just this

0:17:47.880 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 3>wider range of viewpoints that I grew up with. I

0:17:50.040 --> 0:17:52.520
<v Speaker 3>grew up in a sort of a narrow, pretty conservative

0:17:53.160 --> 0:17:56.760
<v Speaker 3>town and just the suburbs, you know, like a lot

0:17:56.800 --> 0:17:59.560
<v Speaker 3>of us. And so yeah, Tumblr really opened my world.

0:17:59.600 --> 0:18:01.240
<v Speaker 3>And I was like, and I had moved to New

0:18:01.320 --> 0:18:03.399
<v Speaker 3>York at that point, I had graduated college, and so

0:18:03.440 --> 0:18:05.840
<v Speaker 3>I was like, wait a minute, there's like a whole

0:18:05.840 --> 0:18:08.120
<v Speaker 3>world out here, and these people are really cool and interesting,

0:18:08.160 --> 0:18:09.800
<v Speaker 3>and even people that I didn't agree with, I just

0:18:09.880 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 3>kind of wanted to like meet them and talk to

0:18:12.640 --> 0:18:16.439
<v Speaker 3>them and you know, experience life outside just what I

0:18:16.480 --> 0:18:17.320
<v Speaker 3>had been exposed to.

0:18:17.560 --> 0:18:21.240
<v Speaker 1>So I'm so interested in the photo that you just

0:18:22.000 --> 0:18:25.120
<v Speaker 1>mentioned because one of my questions for you is about

0:18:25.240 --> 0:18:29.639
<v Speaker 1>women online. So I go to like and MCEE a

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:33.520
<v Speaker 1>lot of female founder events, and one of the things

0:18:33.520 --> 0:18:36.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm always taken by is like, it's so much harder

0:18:37.080 --> 0:18:38.800
<v Speaker 1>to be a woman in business, to be a woman

0:18:38.840 --> 0:18:41.240
<v Speaker 1>in any industry. But one of the things I see

0:18:41.240 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 1>that benefits us is how we gather. Men don't gather

0:18:44.840 --> 0:18:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the same way. And I see it happening on the internet.

0:18:48.880 --> 0:18:52.360
<v Speaker 1>I think TikTok and correct me if I'm wrong. TikTok

0:18:52.440 --> 0:18:57.160
<v Speaker 1>seems like a female run platform or female led at least.

0:18:57.240 --> 0:18:57.879
<v Speaker 1>Is that true?

0:18:58.280 --> 0:19:01.320
<v Speaker 3>I totally agree with you, and I think that's exactly

0:19:01.440 --> 0:19:04.960
<v Speaker 3>why so many men refuse to take it seriously. I mean,

0:19:05.080 --> 0:19:07.639
<v Speaker 3>just it's so funny. I had this bet with my

0:19:07.720 --> 0:19:10.399
<v Speaker 3>friend Katy Newton, who I love and he's actually a

0:19:10.400 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 3>phenomenal gay man. He took TikTok seriously, but he was

0:19:13.680 --> 0:19:16.200
<v Speaker 3>still had this like silicon value mentality where I remember

0:19:16.200 --> 0:19:18.280
<v Speaker 3>we made a bet like will TikTok still be relevant

0:19:18.320 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 3>in a year? I was like, this was back in

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 3>twenty nineteen, and I was like, this is like the

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:24.879
<v Speaker 3>single most relevant platform ever. What are you talking about?

0:19:24.880 --> 0:19:26.920
<v Speaker 3>This is like where especially I'm a huge reality TV

0:19:27.000 --> 0:19:29.680
<v Speaker 3>pop culture stan and like, that's just like where people

0:19:29.720 --> 0:19:31.800
<v Speaker 3>were talking about stuff. And he was like, Oh, it's

0:19:31.800 --> 0:19:33.760
<v Speaker 3>just a silly dance app. It's going to be gone.

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:36.360
<v Speaker 3>And I think actually a lot of Silicon Valley men

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:39.760
<v Speaker 3>they just wrote it off. It's an app for community

0:19:39.800 --> 0:19:43.000
<v Speaker 3>and talking and culture and things that are considered maybe

0:19:43.040 --> 0:19:47.040
<v Speaker 3>soft or like entertainment adjacent. But now you're seeing the

0:19:47.080 --> 0:19:49.920
<v Speaker 3>power of social media. I think women have always dominated

0:19:49.960 --> 0:19:50.639
<v Speaker 3>social media.

0:19:51.160 --> 0:19:54.840
<v Speaker 1>When I watch TikTok, and for some reason, maybe it's

0:19:54.880 --> 0:19:58.360
<v Speaker 1>my age, I'm thirty two, I actually enjoy Instagram more,

0:19:58.400 --> 0:20:01.919
<v Speaker 1>which is not a opinion most people enjoy like they

0:20:02.160 --> 0:20:07.000
<v Speaker 1>report feeling happier using TikTok. But when I see the

0:20:07.040 --> 0:20:10.959
<v Speaker 1>whole trend of story time with women doing their makeup

0:20:11.000 --> 0:20:15.240
<v Speaker 1>and talking to camp. I saw Gloria Steinhem speak live

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:17.679
<v Speaker 1>and she said, one of the most feminist things we

0:20:17.680 --> 0:20:19.760
<v Speaker 1>can do is share our honest stories with each other.

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:24.440
<v Speaker 1>And I'm like, what an incredible way to share our stories.

0:20:24.440 --> 0:20:28.400
<v Speaker 1>And it's so much, it's global, it's diverse, pretty unbelievable.

0:20:29.280 --> 0:20:31.919
<v Speaker 3>I totally agree with you, and I love that and

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:34.320
<v Speaker 3>I think, like, I mean, just that concept of story

0:20:34.359 --> 0:20:36.640
<v Speaker 3>time and the makeup tutorials and stuff, those are all

0:20:36.800 --> 0:20:40.760
<v Speaker 3>formats that were pioneered by women that you know, I

0:20:40.800 --> 0:20:42.680
<v Speaker 3>think it's so yeah, it's so interesting.

0:20:43.119 --> 0:20:45.680
<v Speaker 1>Where do you see the platform going in the next year.

0:20:45.720 --> 0:20:47.960
<v Speaker 1>I know, they kind of just launched TikTok shop in a.

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 3>Real way, TikTok is. The growth has been astounding. They

0:20:51.560 --> 0:20:53.880
<v Speaker 3>switched up leadership at the company recently, so I think

0:20:53.880 --> 0:20:56.840
<v Speaker 3>that they're definitely like they're being more aggressive than they

0:20:56.880 --> 0:21:00.320
<v Speaker 3>were previously. But shopping is I mean, they want to

0:21:00.359 --> 0:21:02.880
<v Speaker 3>just turn that into like an e commerce powerhouse, which

0:21:02.960 --> 0:21:04.840
<v Speaker 3>makes sense. I mean Instagram tried to do the same

0:21:04.840 --> 0:21:06.280
<v Speaker 3>thing we have Instagram Shop.

0:21:06.520 --> 0:21:08.880
<v Speaker 1>I think Instagram has become a virtual mall.

0:21:09.359 --> 0:21:12.800
<v Speaker 3>It is one hundred percent, and I think TikTok is

0:21:12.800 --> 0:21:15.679
<v Speaker 3>going that way. Unfortunately, I mean the problem is that

0:21:15.720 --> 0:21:18.800
<v Speaker 3>these tech companies they have to monetize users somehow, and

0:21:18.840 --> 0:21:21.840
<v Speaker 3>it's either ads or shopping or you know, something where

0:21:21.840 --> 0:21:23.520
<v Speaker 3>they can get a cut of the profits. I don't

0:21:23.520 --> 0:21:25.719
<v Speaker 3>think TikTok's ever going to be like I don't think

0:21:25.760 --> 0:21:29.480
<v Speaker 3>it's going to be fully just products. But if you

0:21:29.480 --> 0:21:31.920
<v Speaker 3>look at Uyin, which is the Chinese version of TikTok,

0:21:31.920 --> 0:21:34.720
<v Speaker 3>it's very it's totally separate, but that has like heavy

0:21:34.720 --> 0:21:36.879
<v Speaker 3>e commerce integration. People shop on there all the time.

0:21:37.560 --> 0:21:41.680
<v Speaker 1>I've seen on video circulate online about how TikTok in

0:21:41.800 --> 0:21:48.680
<v Speaker 1>China feeds their users smarter, more elevated content, and part

0:21:48.720 --> 0:21:50.280
<v Speaker 1>of it is that they want the US to be

0:21:50.359 --> 0:21:51.840
<v Speaker 1>dumbed down? Is there any truth?

0:21:51.960 --> 0:21:55.600
<v Speaker 3>No, that is the dumbest thing ever. There's constantly that

0:21:55.680 --> 0:21:58.000
<v Speaker 3>conspiracy and I was actually talking to a friend in

0:21:58.080 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 3>China about that because that is not true whatsoever. TikTok's

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:07.760
<v Speaker 3>a very global platform, so you know each region is different,

0:22:07.800 --> 0:22:10.440
<v Speaker 3>but your TikTok feed is very much a reflection of

0:22:11.119 --> 0:22:13.919
<v Speaker 3>what you engage with and what the algorithm anticipates you

0:22:13.920 --> 0:22:16.439
<v Speaker 3>will engage with. So it is possible to change your

0:22:16.440 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 3>algorithm and stop engaging with stuff like that if you

0:22:18.600 --> 0:22:20.920
<v Speaker 3>feel like it's dumbing you down, you know, seek out

0:22:21.160 --> 0:22:25.320
<v Speaker 3>different content. But that is a conspiracy that people have had.

0:22:25.359 --> 0:22:27.280
<v Speaker 3>And also it's not social media that's making us dumber.

0:22:27.320 --> 0:22:30.359
<v Speaker 3>TikTok is informing us about the world like we are

0:22:30.400 --> 0:22:33.600
<v Speaker 3>gathering information. I would say TikTok is making us smarter

0:22:33.760 --> 0:22:36.560
<v Speaker 3>than you know a lot on Instagram. I love Instagram,

0:22:36.560 --> 0:22:38.560
<v Speaker 3>but Instagram's a very visual in nature, and I would

0:22:38.560 --> 0:22:41.480
<v Speaker 3>say YouTube is probably the closest competitor. There's a huge

0:22:41.480 --> 0:22:42.640
<v Speaker 3>amount of information on there.

0:22:43.240 --> 0:22:46.159
<v Speaker 1>Talk to me about the role and the evolution of

0:22:46.280 --> 0:22:47.160
<v Speaker 1>the influencer.

0:22:48.040 --> 0:22:51.439
<v Speaker 3>There was this whole period in the two thousands where

0:22:51.560 --> 0:22:55.359
<v Speaker 3>there were these bloggers, really, most notably mommy bloggers, which

0:22:55.760 --> 0:22:57.560
<v Speaker 3>is kind of a term that a lot of them

0:22:57.600 --> 0:23:00.320
<v Speaker 3>don't like but sort of came to embrace because there

0:23:00.320 --> 0:23:02.800
<v Speaker 3>was no better term. It was women blogging about their

0:23:02.800 --> 0:23:06.560
<v Speaker 3>experiences of motherhood. They were the first people really on

0:23:06.600 --> 0:23:09.920
<v Speaker 3>the Internet to monetize their personal brands at scale. So

0:23:09.960 --> 0:23:12.240
<v Speaker 3>they you know, there were men writing about politics and

0:23:12.280 --> 0:23:14.760
<v Speaker 3>tech and all these other things. They were monetizing their blogs,

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:16.879
<v Speaker 3>but they weren't They didn't have this cult of personality

0:23:16.880 --> 0:23:19.520
<v Speaker 3>and they weren't monetizing their lives the way that mommy

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:23.040
<v Speaker 3>bloggers were. So mommy bloggers really sort of pioneered the

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:26.879
<v Speaker 3>influencer world along with MySpace celebrities, you know, Jeffree Stars,

0:23:26.920 --> 0:23:28.679
<v Speaker 3>some of them are still with us, but they were

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:32.680
<v Speaker 3>sort of developing these cults of personality, and it wasn't

0:23:32.760 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 3>until kind of YouTube and social media took off, really

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:41.199
<v Speaker 3>the rise of YouTube, vine and Instagram, Pinterest, like this

0:23:41.280 --> 0:23:44.679
<v Speaker 3>sort of early twenty tens boom of digital media that

0:23:45.119 --> 0:23:47.919
<v Speaker 3>you saw what we now consider the influencer industry to emerge.

0:23:47.960 --> 0:23:50.840
<v Speaker 3>And even then the first half the twenty tens, they

0:23:50.880 --> 0:23:53.359
<v Speaker 3>weren't called influencers yet, they were called these platforms. It

0:23:53.400 --> 0:23:58.399
<v Speaker 3>was YouTuber, viner, instagrammer. And then once the marketing dollars

0:23:58.400 --> 0:24:00.480
<v Speaker 3>really started pouring in the mid twenty fifth teens, that's

0:24:00.480 --> 0:24:03.040
<v Speaker 3>when you saw the term influencer come to be and

0:24:03.400 --> 0:24:04.840
<v Speaker 3>that sort of modern usage.

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:08.359
<v Speaker 1>I find it interesting that there's sort of a I

0:24:08.400 --> 0:24:11.120
<v Speaker 1>don't want to say negative connotation, because it's not negative,

0:24:11.160 --> 0:24:15.360
<v Speaker 1>but there's sort of like an iroll connotation associated with influencer.

0:24:16.560 --> 0:24:20.239
<v Speaker 1>Living in la and being friends with some influencers and

0:24:20.320 --> 0:24:23.879
<v Speaker 1>being in the digital world. They first of all, they

0:24:23.920 --> 0:24:26.360
<v Speaker 1>work so hard, most of them like it's a very

0:24:26.400 --> 0:24:29.600
<v Speaker 1>taxing job. So I don't feel the iroll in any way,

0:24:29.680 --> 0:24:33.560
<v Speaker 1>But I do see the role of influence changing. When

0:24:33.600 --> 0:24:37.760
<v Speaker 1>I look on Instagram the perfect aesthetic photo, and I

0:24:37.760 --> 0:24:39.800
<v Speaker 1>think this is impart due to TikTok, But that perfect

0:24:39.840 --> 0:24:44.160
<v Speaker 1>photo almost feels like twenty seventeen cosplay, Like I'm like, wait,

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:45.160
<v Speaker 1>what am I looking at?

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:48.640
<v Speaker 3>When I wrote this piece, it's called the Instagram Aesthetic

0:24:48.760 --> 0:24:51.080
<v Speaker 3>is Over, and it was this piece I wrote in

0:24:51.200 --> 0:24:53.720
<v Speaker 3>twenty nineteen. Yeah, with the rise of TikTok and all

0:24:53.760 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 3>this stuff, and it.

0:24:54.240 --> 0:24:56.680
<v Speaker 1>Was, well, you wrote this in twenty nineteen.

0:24:56.440 --> 0:24:59.000
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, that was when it all started. Yeah, when I

0:24:59.000 --> 0:25:01.600
<v Speaker 3>got that story, a bunch of those influencers that had

0:25:01.600 --> 0:25:04.760
<v Speaker 3>built their careers off this really hypercurated look, they started

0:25:04.800 --> 0:25:07.479
<v Speaker 3>to notice that their followers were stagnant. And twenty nineteen

0:25:07.560 --> 0:25:09.560
<v Speaker 3>is also when TikTok started to really take off. It

0:25:09.600 --> 0:25:12.040
<v Speaker 3>hadn't entered sort of the mainstream twenty twenty. I think

0:25:12.040 --> 0:25:15.439
<v Speaker 3>the pandemic like made it go bonkers. But twenty nineteen

0:25:15.520 --> 0:25:17.880
<v Speaker 3>is when the hype house launched Charlie Demilio took off.

0:25:17.960 --> 0:25:21.880
<v Speaker 3>Like you just started to see more raw content, and yeah,

0:25:21.920 --> 0:25:24.920
<v Speaker 3>it's totally changed. I don't think people want that hypercurated

0:25:25.000 --> 0:25:27.400
<v Speaker 3>look for Miraad reasons. It's also just impossible to keep

0:25:27.480 --> 0:25:30.200
<v Speaker 3>up with. It's unrelatable, and I think it burned a

0:25:30.240 --> 0:25:33.840
<v Speaker 3>lot of influencers out trying to, you know, keep up

0:25:33.880 --> 0:25:35.760
<v Speaker 3>with that. It's like you had to edit every picture,

0:25:35.760 --> 0:25:38.320
<v Speaker 3>you had to look so perfect. And as we move

0:25:38.359 --> 0:25:40.440
<v Speaker 3>towards video, it's a little bit harder. I mean, there's

0:25:40.440 --> 0:25:43.560
<v Speaker 3>still so many aspirational people online. But that term influencer,

0:25:43.600 --> 0:25:46.720
<v Speaker 3>I will say, I think it's very gendered. I think

0:25:46.760 --> 0:25:49.119
<v Speaker 3>when you say influencer, it's just this notion of like

0:25:49.160 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 3>influencers are just these vapid women, you know, out selling

0:25:54.080 --> 0:25:57.639
<v Speaker 3>their bodies, and that's not what it is. It's actually

0:25:57.680 --> 0:26:00.879
<v Speaker 3>extremely hard. Being a content creator is so much work

0:26:01.160 --> 0:26:03.760
<v Speaker 3>and productizing yourself built. I mean you're building your own

0:26:03.800 --> 0:26:06.639
<v Speaker 3>media company. Basically, you're building your own you're an entrepreneur,

0:26:07.280 --> 0:26:09.399
<v Speaker 3>and but they're not thought of as entrepreneurs.

0:26:09.920 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 1>The men are, Like I just interviewed Marquez Brownlee at

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the conference, and he's incredibly impressive. But there are also

0:26:19.720 --> 0:26:22.720
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of women who have built empires just as

0:26:22.840 --> 0:26:27.120
<v Speaker 1>large as his, and because they're in he's in tech,

0:26:27.240 --> 0:26:30.320
<v Speaker 1>and they're in different industries and so they're not looked

0:26:30.320 --> 0:26:34.960
<v Speaker 1>at as these like sort of boy wonders exactly.

0:26:35.520 --> 0:26:40.120
<v Speaker 3>And the people building those massive, you know, brands were

0:26:40.160 --> 0:26:42.240
<v Speaker 3>women and a lot of times it was around beauty

0:26:42.240 --> 0:26:44.440
<v Speaker 3>and fashion. I mean I talked about this in my book,

0:26:44.520 --> 0:26:46.880
<v Speaker 3>but I mean Ari L. Charnis like what she did

0:26:46.880 --> 0:26:49.399
<v Speaker 3>at Nordstrom and the way I mean Nordstrom sort of

0:26:49.480 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 3>latched onto the influencer sort of business really early and

0:26:52.400 --> 0:26:55.960
<v Speaker 3>noticed very early the sales that it could drive. But

0:26:56.000 --> 0:26:58.840
<v Speaker 3>there were these women that were selling out millions of

0:26:58.880 --> 0:27:02.880
<v Speaker 3>dollars in product building this whole distribution networks for their

0:27:03.440 --> 0:27:07.399
<v Speaker 3>you know, fashion or accessory lines and just and productizing themselves.

0:27:07.440 --> 0:27:09.640
<v Speaker 3>And they have huge content studios, and they also employed

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:11.959
<v Speaker 3>dozens of people, sometimes even more than that, you know,

0:27:12.600 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 3>But they're not looked at as entrepreneurs. They're laughed at

0:27:14.840 --> 0:27:20.040
<v Speaker 3>because they're conventionally attractive beautiful women, and businessmen or whatever

0:27:20.119 --> 0:27:22.920
<v Speaker 3>don't take them seriously, and tech reporters don't take them seriously.

0:27:23.800 --> 0:27:26.760
<v Speaker 1>So I think we hear a lot about the corporate

0:27:26.800 --> 0:27:28.919
<v Speaker 1>side of the story when it comes to social media,

0:27:29.000 --> 0:27:32.399
<v Speaker 1>Like I immediately think about the Facebook movie right like

0:27:32.640 --> 0:27:36.960
<v Speaker 1>about how it was founded. We hear less about influencers

0:27:36.960 --> 0:27:40.720
<v Speaker 1>that have really shaped these platforms, who are like four

0:27:40.800 --> 0:27:41.760
<v Speaker 1>standouts to you.

0:27:42.520 --> 0:27:45.040
<v Speaker 3>Oh my god, such a good question. Yeah, there's so

0:27:45.160 --> 0:27:48.760
<v Speaker 3>many interesting people. I mean, I think Hea theyre armstrong.

0:27:48.840 --> 0:27:52.080
<v Speaker 3>Unfortunately she passed away recently. She was a blogger. I

0:27:52.080 --> 0:27:54.199
<v Speaker 3>don't know that she shaped the platform, but what she

0:27:54.240 --> 0:27:55.760
<v Speaker 3>did was she was one of the first to really

0:27:55.800 --> 0:28:01.640
<v Speaker 3>monetize through sponsored posts on her page, and I think

0:28:01.760 --> 0:28:05.600
<v Speaker 3>she changed blogging really and sort of how people thought

0:28:05.600 --> 0:28:08.560
<v Speaker 3>about integrating branded content into their own feeds. I know

0:28:08.600 --> 0:28:11.320
<v Speaker 3>that sounds silly, but like it was so pioneering. She

0:28:11.359 --> 0:28:15.879
<v Speaker 3>really deserves credit other people. I mean, Michelle Fon, she

0:28:16.040 --> 0:28:19.560
<v Speaker 3>was this massively popular like beauty blogger, and I think

0:28:19.720 --> 0:28:21.639
<v Speaker 3>showed a lot of people on the YouTube side, like

0:28:21.800 --> 0:28:24.199
<v Speaker 3>the level of business acumen that these people could have

0:28:24.280 --> 0:28:27.640
<v Speaker 3>and kind of how big their business could become. Other women,

0:28:27.680 --> 0:28:29.920
<v Speaker 3>I mean, I write about Julia Allison in my book

0:28:30.080 --> 0:28:34.280
<v Speaker 3>as well. She also shaped Tumblr so much, like she

0:28:34.359 --> 0:28:37.520
<v Speaker 3>had this really symbiotic relationship with Tumblr and her audience

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:39.600
<v Speaker 3>and kind of like all the time, like these tech

0:28:39.600 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 3>companies sort of there was a push and pull with

0:28:43.320 --> 0:28:46.200
<v Speaker 3>the way that they treated women. I mean, Charlie Dmilio

0:28:46.280 --> 0:28:49.320
<v Speaker 3>is another good example, right, Like so much of TikTok's

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:51.440
<v Speaker 3>success and the way that it got into the mainstream

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:54.560
<v Speaker 3>was people being like, who is this girl that suddenly

0:28:54.600 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 3>everyone's fascinated with and she's you know, sitting front row

0:28:58.040 --> 0:29:00.479
<v Speaker 3>at the Louis Vuitton show or whatever. Right, and so,

0:29:01.000 --> 0:29:03.360
<v Speaker 3>but I think these tech companies will almost always resent

0:29:03.560 --> 0:29:05.920
<v Speaker 3>their power users and kind of have this tension with

0:29:05.960 --> 0:29:07.600
<v Speaker 3>them because what's in the best interest of the power

0:29:07.680 --> 0:29:09.800
<v Speaker 3>users is not always in the best interests of the platform,

0:29:10.360 --> 0:29:13.440
<v Speaker 3>and so they never want to overly affiliate themselves with

0:29:13.600 --> 0:29:15.600
<v Speaker 3>these people. But that at the same time, these people

0:29:15.600 --> 0:29:17.560
<v Speaker 3>in these personalities, often women are the ones that are

0:29:17.640 --> 0:29:18.920
<v Speaker 3>mainstreaming their platforms.

0:29:19.600 --> 0:29:20.960
<v Speaker 1>And why do you think it's women?

0:29:22.240 --> 0:29:24.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean, women are just the ones to build audiences.

0:29:24.680 --> 0:29:26.360
<v Speaker 3>Like if you look at a lot of the like,

0:29:26.400 --> 0:29:29.440
<v Speaker 3>I think it's about community. I think it's because women

0:29:29.440 --> 0:29:32.440
<v Speaker 3>are shoppers, women are communicators, you know. Women. I look

0:29:32.440 --> 0:29:35.280
<v Speaker 3>at someone like Amber Ven's box who transform the industry.

0:29:35.440 --> 0:29:37.240
<v Speaker 3>She built reward Style. A lot of people know what

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:40.040
<v Speaker 3>it's like to know it. I don't think that Instagram

0:29:40.080 --> 0:29:42.920
<v Speaker 3>would have built all those e commerce features had she

0:29:43.080 --> 0:29:47.040
<v Speaker 3>not built reward Style into such a massive business. And

0:29:47.200 --> 0:29:49.200
<v Speaker 3>I think that takes a woman to do a lot

0:29:49.240 --> 0:29:51.960
<v Speaker 3>of this stuff. And she's another one. I guess that

0:29:51.960 --> 0:29:54.040
<v Speaker 3>would be my fourth of Like, I mean, she's just

0:29:54.440 --> 0:29:58.520
<v Speaker 3>like pioneered that whole dotion of monetizing Instagram when Instagram

0:29:58.840 --> 0:30:00.800
<v Speaker 3>didn't want ads that that was at a time when

0:30:00.800 --> 0:30:02.520
<v Speaker 3>Instagram was like, no, we hate all of that, we

0:30:02.520 --> 0:30:04.760
<v Speaker 3>don't want any of that, and she recognized that the

0:30:04.800 --> 0:30:05.880
<v Speaker 3>e commerce potential.

0:30:06.840 --> 0:30:11.040
<v Speaker 1>You have this chapter titled Breakdown and Burnout, and it

0:30:11.080 --> 0:30:14.120
<v Speaker 1>does sort of it talks about the Instagram aesthetic that

0:30:14.320 --> 0:30:17.360
<v Speaker 1>is no longer as popular. When you think about gen

0:30:17.480 --> 0:30:21.720
<v Speaker 1>z and what they're wanting from social media, what are

0:30:21.760 --> 0:30:24.880
<v Speaker 1>they wanting? I see them use it completely differently than

0:30:24.920 --> 0:30:25.200
<v Speaker 1>I do.

0:30:25.760 --> 0:30:28.320
<v Speaker 3>One thing that younger users use it more is it's

0:30:28.320 --> 0:30:30.680
<v Speaker 3>more integrated. They don't think of their sort of online

0:30:30.680 --> 0:30:33.600
<v Speaker 3>selves as separate. They don't have that strong separation. I

0:30:33.600 --> 0:30:37.400
<v Speaker 3>think because it's been integrated into their life for so long.

0:30:37.440 --> 0:30:41.720
<v Speaker 3>They're very comfortable making digital connections. Do you remember, I mean,

0:30:41.760 --> 0:30:44.400
<v Speaker 3>I think we're like around like both women and their authorities. Like,

0:30:44.760 --> 0:30:46.520
<v Speaker 3>it used to be very weird to have like an

0:30:46.600 --> 0:30:49.000
<v Speaker 3>online friend or be like, oh I met this person online,

0:30:49.040 --> 0:30:50.400
<v Speaker 3>Like there was a stigma around that.

0:30:50.520 --> 0:30:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Even told someone, they'd be like are you safe? Like

0:30:53.240 --> 0:30:55.680
<v Speaker 1>call us yeah.

0:30:55.200 --> 0:30:58.320
<v Speaker 3>One hundred percent whereas like young people, it's just it's

0:30:58.400 --> 0:31:02.240
<v Speaker 3>so much more normalized. Online dating I think helped really

0:31:02.360 --> 0:31:05.000
<v Speaker 3>shuffle that era in of it like meeting people, just

0:31:05.040 --> 0:31:07.280
<v Speaker 3>the way it changed our social perceptions of the Internet.

0:31:07.280 --> 0:31:09.400
<v Speaker 3>But they're much more likely to make online connections, to

0:31:09.440 --> 0:31:13.880
<v Speaker 3>find communities online. They also do want more privacy. I

0:31:13.880 --> 0:31:16.520
<v Speaker 3>think we grew up in this era of like everything

0:31:16.560 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 3>you post is public, it's permanent, and it's going to

0:31:19.760 --> 0:31:21.000
<v Speaker 3>the entire world.

0:31:21.200 --> 0:31:24.200
<v Speaker 1>And you are drinking a beer on Facebook, not getting

0:31:24.240 --> 0:31:25.280
<v Speaker 1>into college.

0:31:26.160 --> 0:31:29.959
<v Speaker 3>Exactly, And I think now there's this understanding of like,

0:31:30.120 --> 0:31:32.920
<v Speaker 3>we're all human in some ways, and I think, like

0:31:33.160 --> 0:31:36.080
<v Speaker 3>I think just from a personal level, people don't want

0:31:36.120 --> 0:31:38.360
<v Speaker 3>that right they want That's why you see young people

0:31:38.440 --> 0:31:42.280
<v Speaker 3>gravitating towards more ephemeral forms of media, whether it's Snapchat,

0:31:42.320 --> 0:31:45.360
<v Speaker 3>whether it's just the stories feature on Instagram that skews

0:31:45.400 --> 0:31:48.880
<v Speaker 3>much younger and sort of more private spaces like discord

0:31:49.040 --> 0:31:50.959
<v Speaker 3>and Facebook groups.

0:31:51.520 --> 0:31:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Do you see AI revolutionizing social or just sort of

0:31:56.160 --> 0:31:57.520
<v Speaker 1>being in addition to.

0:31:58.320 --> 0:32:00.440
<v Speaker 3>No one hundred percent? I mean, if you think of

0:32:00.480 --> 0:32:04.440
<v Speaker 3>AI already, that's what led to TikTok's success. Was there

0:32:04.880 --> 0:32:09.880
<v Speaker 3>incredible algorithm built on this really sophisticated, you know AI systems,

0:32:10.120 --> 0:32:13.840
<v Speaker 3>so it's already shaping our world through AI driven algorithms.

0:32:14.000 --> 0:32:18.160
<v Speaker 3>I think AI creative tools are also becoming increasingly popular,

0:32:18.200 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 3>things like the green screen feature. You know, like we've

0:32:21.080 --> 0:32:23.480
<v Speaker 3>seen these new formats take off. People don't think of

0:32:23.520 --> 0:32:25.800
<v Speaker 3>that as AI, but it really is. I mean, I

0:32:25.880 --> 0:32:27.760
<v Speaker 3>use an AI editing tool that sort of strips the

0:32:27.760 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 3>white space from all my videos because I pause too much.

0:32:31.680 --> 0:32:33.800
<v Speaker 3>So I think as creative tools it'll be great. I

0:32:33.800 --> 0:32:36.440
<v Speaker 3>think the image generation and video generation stuff is scary

0:32:36.480 --> 0:32:38.280
<v Speaker 3>to people who do that sort of creative work. Same

0:32:38.280 --> 0:32:41.160
<v Speaker 3>thing with writing, but it's so it's we're still really

0:32:41.160 --> 0:32:45.160
<v Speaker 3>far off from when that stuff can truly replace, you know,

0:32:45.320 --> 0:32:47.200
<v Speaker 3>human creatives. And I think there will always be a

0:32:47.320 --> 0:32:49.960
<v Speaker 3>role for human creativity. So I don't think it's like

0:32:50.000 --> 0:32:50.840
<v Speaker 3>the end of the world.

0:32:51.480 --> 0:32:53.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't either. I've been interviewing a bunch of people

0:32:53.800 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 1>on it, and I'm actually sort of hopeful.

0:32:57.200 --> 0:33:00.240
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, me too. I'm a tech optimist though, so I

0:33:00.560 --> 0:33:02.680
<v Speaker 3>you know, ultimately, I'm like, I think it'll be good.

0:33:03.120 --> 0:33:07.240
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, I'm a life optimist, so I get it. Do

0:33:07.280 --> 0:33:09.800
<v Speaker 1>you think that there is anything out there that people

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:12.560
<v Speaker 1>are really craving when it comes to social that hasn't

0:33:12.680 --> 0:33:14.720
<v Speaker 1>been popularized or even created yet.

0:33:15.600 --> 0:33:19.560
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I think that there's signs that people want simultaneous

0:33:19.600 --> 0:33:22.480
<v Speaker 3>experiences online, and I don't think any company has really

0:33:22.560 --> 0:33:26.320
<v Speaker 3>successfully been able to productize that. I think things like

0:33:26.400 --> 0:33:29.280
<v Speaker 3>Clubhouse and be Real, like Clubhouse offered these sort of

0:33:29.280 --> 0:33:32.560
<v Speaker 3>simultaneous audio rooms. Be Real is all about sort of

0:33:32.600 --> 0:33:35.680
<v Speaker 3>like taking this sort of simultaneous photos and experiencing these

0:33:35.680 --> 0:33:38.200
<v Speaker 3>moments together and having a more closed network. I think

0:33:38.200 --> 0:33:41.160
<v Speaker 3>people obviously want that, but I don't. Both Clubhouse and

0:33:41.200 --> 0:33:42.760
<v Speaker 3>vi Real work up and down, you know, like it

0:33:42.800 --> 0:33:45.120
<v Speaker 3>was a hype cycle and I don't see it. So

0:33:45.160 --> 0:33:48.000
<v Speaker 3>I think that, like, I think people want more simultaneous

0:33:48.000 --> 0:33:52.040
<v Speaker 3>connection and authentic forms of connection online, but I'm not

0:33:52.080 --> 0:33:55.480
<v Speaker 3>sure any app has like truly unlocked that that sort

0:33:55.520 --> 0:33:57.080
<v Speaker 3>of user desire.

0:33:58.520 --> 0:34:03.440
<v Speaker 1>To me, the social interaction fuels real life interaction, Like

0:34:03.480 --> 0:34:07.960
<v Speaker 1>there's still nothing that replaces your five senses. But yeah,

0:34:08.080 --> 0:34:12.120
<v Speaker 1>that authentic connection online really does sort of strengthen what

0:34:12.360 --> 0:34:16.680
<v Speaker 1>can be in real life totally. I've heard you say

0:34:16.680 --> 0:34:19.680
<v Speaker 1>that Threads is like Disneyland. I want to know say

0:34:19.800 --> 0:34:21.640
<v Speaker 1>what you mean by that, and b is that a

0:34:21.719 --> 0:34:23.840
<v Speaker 1>hype cycle too, or you think Threads is here to stay?

0:34:24.960 --> 0:34:27.799
<v Speaker 3>So I know, I meant Threads is like Disneyland in

0:34:27.800 --> 0:34:31.480
<v Speaker 3>the sense that like it's very sterilized and very corporate,

0:34:31.560 --> 0:34:33.759
<v Speaker 3>and you know, you saw every single brand on there

0:34:33.760 --> 0:34:37.000
<v Speaker 3>in the first week, like interesting out there, Like it

0:34:37.040 --> 0:34:39.399
<v Speaker 3>was so quickly embraced by brands, because brands have really

0:34:39.400 --> 0:34:41.560
<v Speaker 3>fleed Twitter X, whatever you want to call it.

0:34:41.640 --> 0:34:44.160
<v Speaker 1>There's something wholesome about it. I agree with you.

0:34:44.200 --> 0:34:46.440
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, but it's become such a cesspool. I don't generally

0:34:46.480 --> 0:34:49.040
<v Speaker 3>use it anymore. I'm into Threads. We'll see. I think

0:34:49.040 --> 0:34:51.120
<v Speaker 3>it's way too early. You know, Facebook does not have

0:34:51.200 --> 0:34:54.719
<v Speaker 3>a good track record of building standalone products at all.

0:34:54.920 --> 0:34:58.080
<v Speaker 3>But I think the initial use definitely shows a desire

0:34:58.120 --> 0:35:02.040
<v Speaker 3>from people to to have some sort of tech space media.

0:35:02.640 --> 0:35:04.760
<v Speaker 3>So I hope it sticks around. I'm rooting for Threads.

0:35:04.840 --> 0:35:07.160
<v Speaker 3>Hate to root for Mark Zuckerberg, but I have to

0:35:07.160 --> 0:35:09.880
<v Speaker 3>say in this instance, yeah, I like Threads.

0:35:10.280 --> 0:35:12.719
<v Speaker 1>Well, I hate to root for Mark Zuckerberg just.

0:35:12.680 --> 0:35:15.280
<v Speaker 3>Because he's already like so successful. He's already had Facebook.

0:35:15.360 --> 0:35:17.560
<v Speaker 3>You know, he purchased Instagram at just the right time.

0:35:17.719 --> 0:35:21.160
<v Speaker 3>Like he's fine. I would love to see a new entrepreneur,

0:35:21.960 --> 0:35:24.680
<v Speaker 3>maybe not just like the usual kind of tech guys

0:35:24.680 --> 0:35:26.960
<v Speaker 3>that we've already seen for the past decade. Like I

0:35:27.000 --> 0:35:30.320
<v Speaker 3>would love someone new and interesting to build a Twitter

0:35:30.360 --> 0:35:33.960
<v Speaker 3>replacement that really takes off and brings something new. I

0:35:34.120 --> 0:35:35.280
<v Speaker 3>just don't think that'll happen.

0:35:35.440 --> 0:35:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I was listening to an interview with Reid Hoffman, probably

0:35:39.000 --> 0:35:40.600
<v Speaker 1>like a year and a half ago, and he was

0:35:40.640 --> 0:35:44.160
<v Speaker 1>saying that there seems to be a trend that large

0:35:44.160 --> 0:35:48.680
<v Speaker 1>social platforms take off every decade. So Facebook ten years later,

0:35:48.760 --> 0:35:54.880
<v Speaker 1>was Instagram, ten years later was TikTok almost like today. Yeah,

0:35:54.920 --> 0:35:56.120
<v Speaker 1>which is unbelievable.

0:35:56.239 --> 0:35:59.600
<v Speaker 3>Interesting. It's such a good observation, And I wonder if

0:35:59.600 --> 0:36:03.040
<v Speaker 3>that's just because like you need that generational turnover almost,

0:36:03.560 --> 0:36:06.080
<v Speaker 3>you know, for something to really break out. And I

0:36:06.160 --> 0:36:08.000
<v Speaker 3>think a lot of the core use cases of Twitter,

0:36:08.000 --> 0:36:11.600
<v Speaker 3>by the way, have already been subsumed by TikTok. What

0:36:11.640 --> 0:36:13.960
<v Speaker 3>do you mean by that, like just in terms of, like,

0:36:14.000 --> 0:36:15.520
<v Speaker 3>you know, Twitter used to be this place where you

0:36:15.560 --> 0:36:17.799
<v Speaker 3>would go and get news about the world, like that

0:36:17.880 --> 0:36:20.160
<v Speaker 3>was a core use case for it. I think people

0:36:20.200 --> 0:36:21.920
<v Speaker 3>a would creasingly go to TikTok, you know, for instance,

0:36:21.920 --> 0:36:23.879
<v Speaker 3>when there was like the war in Ukraine or whatever,

0:36:24.000 --> 0:36:26.360
<v Speaker 3>people were learning about it through TikTok videos and like

0:36:26.800 --> 0:36:28.960
<v Speaker 3>when news breaks, I was a big I'm big vander

0:36:28.960 --> 0:36:32.240
<v Speaker 3>Pump rules person, and when there was all this drama

0:36:32.360 --> 0:36:34.440
<v Speaker 3>on that show, like I'm going on TikTok to look

0:36:34.440 --> 0:36:37.360
<v Speaker 3>at analysis videos, I'm not really going on Twitter for

0:36:37.400 --> 0:36:38.080
<v Speaker 3>that anymore.

0:36:38.440 --> 0:36:40.040
<v Speaker 1>You're right, there was a replacement.

0:36:40.600 --> 0:36:40.960
<v Speaker 3>Mm hmm.

0:36:41.160 --> 0:36:43.960
<v Speaker 1>The great observation. So I think a lot of us

0:36:44.280 --> 0:36:48.640
<v Speaker 1>see our experience interacting with social media as something that

0:36:49.160 --> 0:36:51.719
<v Speaker 1>almost happens to us. Like I hear a lot of

0:36:51.719 --> 0:36:53.920
<v Speaker 1>the language around it that it's out of our control,

0:36:54.000 --> 0:36:57.680
<v Speaker 1>that we're addicted and it's maybe not our faults. I

0:36:57.719 --> 0:37:00.440
<v Speaker 1>don't know how I personally feel about it. I think

0:37:00.880 --> 0:37:04.560
<v Speaker 1>like we have to be able to override, like these

0:37:04.560 --> 0:37:09.800
<v Speaker 1>are just platforms, and that's like sort of blaming TV. Yeah,

0:37:09.960 --> 0:37:14.239
<v Speaker 1>So you say the influential power users fundamentally reshaped how

0:37:14.320 --> 0:37:17.279
<v Speaker 1>people use all these platforms, and you want people to

0:37:17.400 --> 0:37:20.520
<v Speaker 1>keep that in mind. So can you sort of expand

0:37:20.560 --> 0:37:22.239
<v Speaker 1>on that and how do you suggest that we take

0:37:22.280 --> 0:37:23.800
<v Speaker 1>back control so to speak?

0:37:24.280 --> 0:37:26.680
<v Speaker 3>Definitely, Yes, this is like a core theme of my

0:37:26.719 --> 0:37:31.120
<v Speaker 3>book because so often power users use these platforms in

0:37:31.239 --> 0:37:34.520
<v Speaker 3>ways that the founders never intended, you know, Like I

0:37:34.560 --> 0:37:36.279
<v Speaker 3>mean the get ready with me format is like a

0:37:36.280 --> 0:37:38.240
<v Speaker 3>good example, but like you know, there's so many ways,

0:37:38.280 --> 0:37:41.360
<v Speaker 3>like just the monetization, like people sort of built this industry.

0:37:41.520 --> 0:37:43.520
<v Speaker 3>I mean Vine is also a really good example, because

0:37:43.920 --> 0:37:45.719
<v Speaker 3>the founders of Vine wanted it to be this like

0:37:45.719 --> 0:37:49.400
<v Speaker 3>stop motion animation, artsy film ap and it was this

0:37:49.640 --> 0:37:52.279
<v Speaker 3>place for pranks and jokes and you know, it told

0:37:52.320 --> 0:37:54.759
<v Speaker 3>and the founders hated that and they didn't want it,

0:37:54.840 --> 0:37:56.799
<v Speaker 3>and you know it was like too bad. This is

0:37:56.800 --> 0:37:59.080
<v Speaker 3>how people want to use it. So I think that

0:37:59.200 --> 0:38:02.440
<v Speaker 3>like we sort of collectively as users need to exert

0:38:02.480 --> 0:38:04.879
<v Speaker 3>power over these platforms and call for changes that we want.

0:38:04.920 --> 0:38:07.080
<v Speaker 3>I mean, harassment's a good example, right, Like we've seen

0:38:07.120 --> 0:38:09.160
<v Speaker 3>a little bit of success for this. You have huge

0:38:09.200 --> 0:38:12.200
<v Speaker 3>outcries from users saying we want more protections. I mean,

0:38:12.239 --> 0:38:14.920
<v Speaker 3>this is why Twitter added things like the ability to

0:38:14.960 --> 0:38:17.480
<v Speaker 3>limit replies or just like these small things. I mean

0:38:17.520 --> 0:38:22.320
<v Speaker 3>Instagram didn't even add the ability to like filter comments

0:38:22.320 --> 0:38:24.319
<v Speaker 3>for a really long time, and that was driven by

0:38:24.400 --> 0:38:26.480
<v Speaker 3>users being like we need this power. Users people with

0:38:26.560 --> 0:38:28.799
<v Speaker 3>huge audiences because they sort of experienced the worst of

0:38:28.840 --> 0:38:31.480
<v Speaker 3>social platforms early, or like they're sort of they're so

0:38:31.600 --> 0:38:34.400
<v Speaker 3>exposed to these platforms that they understand the problems of them,

0:38:34.840 --> 0:38:37.880
<v Speaker 3>usually before it trickles down. But I just think we

0:38:37.920 --> 0:38:40.480
<v Speaker 3>need more collective action on the part of users. There's

0:38:40.520 --> 0:38:42.880
<v Speaker 3>been a lot of talk of like sort of content

0:38:42.920 --> 0:38:46.279
<v Speaker 3>creators unionizing. I think that's really amazing if they can

0:38:46.320 --> 0:38:49.200
<v Speaker 3>pull that off. I think even without that sort of structure,

0:38:50.520 --> 0:38:54.560
<v Speaker 3>just any sort of collective bargaining you could say against

0:38:54.600 --> 0:38:58.400
<v Speaker 3>these tech platforms and saying, look, we are millions of people,

0:38:58.480 --> 0:39:00.520
<v Speaker 3>and a lot of us have a really strong interest

0:39:00.600 --> 0:39:04.200
<v Speaker 3>in features that we want or limitations we want put

0:39:04.200 --> 0:39:07.080
<v Speaker 3>on these platforms, So make it happen.

0:39:08.160 --> 0:39:13.359
<v Speaker 1>So in Hillary Clinton's last book, there was a part

0:39:13.360 --> 0:39:16.960
<v Speaker 1>where somebody asked in conversation, like, with all the knowledge

0:39:16.960 --> 0:39:22.160
<v Speaker 1>that you have, all of the secure meetings and documents,

0:39:22.200 --> 0:39:25.040
<v Speaker 1>like she has way more information than the average person has. Right,

0:39:25.400 --> 0:39:27.680
<v Speaker 1>with all of that, what are you most fearful of

0:39:28.280 --> 0:39:34.000
<v Speaker 1>in our country? And she said, the rules about the Internet,

0:39:34.040 --> 0:39:36.279
<v Speaker 1>we are so far behind. I'm not sure how we

0:39:36.320 --> 0:39:40.080
<v Speaker 1>will catch up. And she doesn't see the people that

0:39:40.200 --> 0:39:44.200
<v Speaker 1>are politicians in our country really understanding the Internet.

0:39:44.200 --> 0:39:47.600
<v Speaker 3>We need they all need to retire, Like I.

0:39:47.560 --> 0:39:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Mean, we saw that with a lot of the hearings

0:39:49.640 --> 0:39:53.280
<v Speaker 1>with Mark Zuckerberg, like the questions around Instagram and TikTok

0:39:53.320 --> 0:39:58.640
<v Speaker 1>were just confounding. So yeah, I thought that was really interesting.

0:39:58.680 --> 0:40:01.200
<v Speaker 1>Like she didn't say global warming, she didn't say all

0:40:01.280 --> 0:40:03.879
<v Speaker 1>the things she said rules around the Internet. I've never

0:40:03.960 --> 0:40:07.799
<v Speaker 1>been able to ask anybody why that is. What do

0:40:07.840 --> 0:40:09.040
<v Speaker 1>you think she means by that?

0:40:09.360 --> 0:40:11.680
<v Speaker 3>You know what, I think We're in the worst position

0:40:11.760 --> 0:40:14.279
<v Speaker 3>that we could possibly be in right now because we

0:40:14.440 --> 0:40:19.160
<v Speaker 3>desperately need thoughtful, comprehensive regulations. Data privacy reform is a

0:40:19.200 --> 0:40:23.160
<v Speaker 3>really important one, and so there's this public desire for

0:40:23.200 --> 0:40:27.560
<v Speaker 3>that and pressure. But we have these lawmakers in Congress

0:40:27.560 --> 0:40:30.440
<v Speaker 3>who don't know how to turn their computers on, and

0:40:30.480 --> 0:40:33.680
<v Speaker 3>then they're drafting legislation. A lot of this like protect

0:40:33.680 --> 0:40:35.920
<v Speaker 3>the children kind of stuff that's going on right now

0:40:36.000 --> 0:40:41.319
<v Speaker 3>is an example of extremely harmful and dangerous and terrible legislation.

0:40:41.760 --> 0:40:43.960
<v Speaker 3>If you care about you know, a free and open

0:40:43.960 --> 0:40:48.160
<v Speaker 3>internet and privacy and you know, users having power over

0:40:48.200 --> 0:40:50.759
<v Speaker 3>their own online experiences, like that's it's bad. So you

0:40:50.800 --> 0:40:54.760
<v Speaker 3>have this really bad legislation and bad stuff that's actually

0:40:54.760 --> 0:40:56.759
<v Speaker 3>going to end up hurting us way down the rights.

0:40:56.840 --> 0:40:58.600
<v Speaker 3>And it's also just going to silence speech, it's going

0:40:58.640 --> 0:41:01.640
<v Speaker 3>to silence creativity. I think free speech is the most

0:41:01.719 --> 0:41:04.799
<v Speaker 3>important thing that we have in this country, and there's

0:41:04.920 --> 0:41:07.360
<v Speaker 3>this desire to do something about the bad stuff on

0:41:07.400 --> 0:41:09.799
<v Speaker 3>the Internet, and so people want to regulate it, like

0:41:10.080 --> 0:41:13.359
<v Speaker 3>regulate these platforms. But because the politicians don't understand how

0:41:13.360 --> 0:41:15.319
<v Speaker 3>the platforms work, they sort of just bring down this

0:41:15.440 --> 0:41:17.680
<v Speaker 3>banhammer and put things like that Utah law that they

0:41:17.680 --> 0:41:19.640
<v Speaker 3>were trying to pass of like no one under eighteen

0:41:19.680 --> 0:41:21.440
<v Speaker 3>can be on the Internet without the parental you know,

0:41:21.480 --> 0:41:25.279
<v Speaker 3>parental oversight. It's like that's crazy and terrible for LGBTQ

0:41:25.480 --> 0:41:27.480
<v Speaker 3>youth and other people. I mean, it's just that is

0:41:27.520 --> 0:41:30.680
<v Speaker 3>a ridiculous piece of legislation. So I think we need

0:41:30.760 --> 0:41:33.640
<v Speaker 3>people in power that are young. And I hate to

0:41:33.640 --> 0:41:35.600
<v Speaker 3>say it because I'm not trying to sound ageist, but

0:41:36.040 --> 0:41:39.680
<v Speaker 3>truly we need more Internet natives because you don't understand

0:41:39.680 --> 0:41:42.840
<v Speaker 3>it unless you grew up truly immersed in this environment.

0:41:42.920 --> 0:41:45.240
<v Speaker 3>And that's not to say that all young people understand

0:41:45.280 --> 0:41:48.120
<v Speaker 3>the Internet better, but I think just people that use

0:41:48.160 --> 0:41:52.040
<v Speaker 3>the Internet need to be regulating the Internet, and we

0:41:52.080 --> 0:41:55.759
<v Speaker 3>need to stop scapegoating random platforms like TikTok, you know,

0:41:55.840 --> 0:41:58.000
<v Speaker 3>with these fake outreach I mean, I wrote a piece

0:41:58.040 --> 0:42:00.279
<v Speaker 3>about this for the Washington Post, but like that whole

0:42:00.280 --> 0:42:02.799
<v Speaker 3>TikTok hearing, they were freaking out about TikTok challenges that

0:42:02.920 --> 0:42:07.040
<v Speaker 3>don't even exist truly, that have never existed. And in fact,

0:42:07.080 --> 0:42:09.840
<v Speaker 3>some of those challenges, as I reported, started on Facebook

0:42:10.000 --> 0:42:12.640
<v Speaker 3>and YouTube. And so then we want to ban TikTok

0:42:12.640 --> 0:42:15.279
<v Speaker 3>over made up challenges because they don't understand how TikTok works,

0:42:15.719 --> 0:42:17.520
<v Speaker 3>And then we're not fixing the root problem, which is

0:42:17.600 --> 0:42:19.680
<v Speaker 3>data privacy, which we have none of in this country.

0:42:20.120 --> 0:42:21.799
<v Speaker 3>So people can exploit our data. It's like you care

0:42:21.840 --> 0:42:23.560
<v Speaker 3>about China getting our data? They can buy it from

0:42:23.560 --> 0:42:27.040
<v Speaker 3>a Facebook data brokers, you know, like third party, Like,

0:42:27.360 --> 0:42:29.760
<v Speaker 3>we have no data protections in this country. So if

0:42:29.800 --> 0:42:33.000
<v Speaker 3>they truly cared about the issues that they purport to

0:42:33.000 --> 0:42:35.200
<v Speaker 3>care about, they would do something about it. But they

0:42:35.239 --> 0:42:38.480
<v Speaker 3>don't because corporate power has an enormous way in Washington.

0:42:39.080 --> 0:42:40.359
<v Speaker 3>So anyway, not to go on a.

0:42:40.280 --> 0:42:42.960
<v Speaker 1>Political right here, I think that was fascinating. Thank you

0:42:43.000 --> 0:42:46.240
<v Speaker 1>for breaking that down for me because I think partly

0:42:46.239 --> 0:42:48.840
<v Speaker 1>what she meant with cybersecurity, which you mentioned right, like

0:42:48.920 --> 0:42:52.439
<v Speaker 1>cyber terrorism, and I think also everything one hundred percent.

0:42:52.600 --> 0:42:55.319
<v Speaker 3>I mean, but again, we need more privacy protections, we

0:42:55.360 --> 0:42:58.040
<v Speaker 3>need security, and we're going the opposite We're going the

0:42:58.040 --> 0:43:01.600
<v Speaker 3>opposite way. We're like children are being stripped of their

0:43:01.640 --> 0:43:04.480
<v Speaker 3>privacy and so and I actually think that's something that

0:43:04.520 --> 0:43:06.960
<v Speaker 3>no matter what your political beliefs say, I actually feel

0:43:07.000 --> 0:43:09.640
<v Speaker 3>like we all feel this because we all use tech platforms, right,

0:43:09.680 --> 0:43:12.399
<v Speaker 3>we all sort of feel this creep and we all

0:43:12.400 --> 0:43:16.040
<v Speaker 3>want more safety online. And so we'll see what happens.

0:43:16.080 --> 0:43:19.560
<v Speaker 3>But I'm a little bit worried. I kind of agree

0:43:19.600 --> 0:43:21.200
<v Speaker 3>with her that we're in a bad position.

0:43:21.640 --> 0:43:23.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, thanks for breaking it down. Okay, I have some

0:43:23.600 --> 0:43:24.600
<v Speaker 1>rapid fire for us.

0:43:25.040 --> 0:43:25.560
<v Speaker 3>Let's do it.

0:43:26.000 --> 0:43:29.000
<v Speaker 1>I usually don't curse like this on the podcast, but

0:43:29.160 --> 0:43:32.200
<v Speaker 1>fuck Mary, kill Instagram, TikTok Twitter.

0:43:32.400 --> 0:43:35.200
<v Speaker 3>Oh my god, kill Twitter. It's already dead, so I'm

0:43:35.239 --> 0:43:40.040
<v Speaker 3>putting it out of its misery. Yeah, I would say Mary,

0:43:40.080 --> 0:43:42.279
<v Speaker 3>TikTok because I love it. I want to be with

0:43:42.360 --> 0:43:46.279
<v Speaker 3>it forever. And fuck Instagram because I love Instagram. I'm

0:43:46.320 --> 0:43:48.600
<v Speaker 3>with you. I'm like a millennial too. And the sense

0:43:48.680 --> 0:43:51.279
<v Speaker 3>like Instagram is still just like I'll never give it up.

0:43:51.320 --> 0:43:53.160
<v Speaker 3>I know people like to say on Instagram's over, like

0:43:53.200 --> 0:43:56.400
<v Speaker 3>I'm still Instagram girl, but TikTok is so good, so

0:43:56.840 --> 0:43:58.520
<v Speaker 3>I'm marrying it amazing.

0:43:58.800 --> 0:44:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Who is your favorite Internet villain? Somebody that you love

0:44:01.600 --> 0:44:02.040
<v Speaker 1>to hate?

0:44:03.080 --> 0:44:07.640
<v Speaker 3>Oh? God? Also so many, like I mean, the thing

0:44:07.760 --> 0:44:10.440
<v Speaker 3>is the worst villains on the Internet. I can't really defend.

0:44:10.680 --> 0:44:13.560
<v Speaker 3>I will say Tricia Patus is such a complicated figure.

0:44:13.680 --> 0:44:15.200
<v Speaker 3>I think she's a bit of a villain, but I

0:44:15.600 --> 0:44:19.000
<v Speaker 3>just can't stop watching everything that she does.

0:44:19.160 --> 0:44:22.600
<v Speaker 1>So this is actually in tangent with that. Who's an

0:44:22.600 --> 0:44:24.520
<v Speaker 1>Internet villain? You think she'd get a second chance?

0:44:26.040 --> 0:44:28.680
<v Speaker 3>Oh well, I mean, so she's not a villain, But

0:44:29.040 --> 0:44:32.600
<v Speaker 3>Julia Allison was so villainized. She's in my book. This woman,

0:44:33.520 --> 0:44:36.319
<v Speaker 3>what she was put through was so crazy when she

0:44:36.400 --> 0:44:38.920
<v Speaker 3>was actually so ahead of the time. She was this

0:44:38.960 --> 0:44:42.200
<v Speaker 3>influencer from like two thousand and eight, which like totally

0:44:42.200 --> 0:44:43.520
<v Speaker 3>out of her time, one of the first people to

0:44:43.560 --> 0:44:46.280
<v Speaker 3>sign deals with Next New Networks, which was YouTube's first

0:44:46.680 --> 0:44:51.480
<v Speaker 3>MCN multi channel network. Just honestly, she deserves justice for

0:44:51.560 --> 0:44:53.359
<v Speaker 3>Julia Allison, That's what I will say.

0:44:54.120 --> 0:44:57.200
<v Speaker 1>That's Julia. Okay, what is a book you read that

0:44:57.320 --> 0:44:59.399
<v Speaker 1>changed your life, something you think everybody should read.

0:45:00.120 --> 0:45:03.440
<v Speaker 3>Lindy West's book Shrill changed my life. I love that book.

0:45:03.480 --> 0:45:06.000
<v Speaker 3>It's about it's sort of just about like her. I mean,

0:45:06.040 --> 0:45:08.279
<v Speaker 3>she's just a beautiful writer. And that book again, it

0:45:08.360 --> 0:45:11.920
<v Speaker 3>like really informed my thinking about my own body and

0:45:11.960 --> 0:45:14.680
<v Speaker 3>myself and my life is a woman and beauty standards

0:45:14.680 --> 0:45:18.040
<v Speaker 3>and everything. And I just loved that book so much.

0:45:18.560 --> 0:45:22.399
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I do a pretty smart question. So you let

0:45:22.440 --> 0:45:23.560
<v Speaker 1>me know when to stop.

0:45:24.280 --> 0:45:25.759
<v Speaker 3>Okay, stop.

0:45:26.960 --> 0:45:30.480
<v Speaker 1>A lyric poem or mantra quote that you hold on

0:45:30.560 --> 0:45:31.400
<v Speaker 1>too tightly.

0:45:32.239 --> 0:45:35.120
<v Speaker 3>You know what I love. I love the Robert Frost

0:45:35.880 --> 0:45:38.320
<v Speaker 3>line from the poem, but it's nothing gold can stay.

0:45:39.280 --> 0:45:42.120
<v Speaker 3>And I think about that all the time because I

0:45:42.160 --> 0:45:44.920
<v Speaker 3>think life is so fleeting, and the good parts of

0:45:44.960 --> 0:45:48.120
<v Speaker 3>life are they'd go away so quickly. Everything, especially on

0:45:48.160 --> 0:45:50.759
<v Speaker 3>the Internet, is so fleeting, and I just think every

0:45:50.760 --> 0:45:53.600
<v Speaker 3>time I find something really beautiful happening online or some

0:45:53.719 --> 0:45:57.680
<v Speaker 3>amazing community, I just think of nothing gold can stay,

0:45:57.719 --> 0:46:02.400
<v Speaker 3>because nothing beautiful stays beautiful forever, and things fall apart

0:46:02.520 --> 0:46:05.960
<v Speaker 3>or evolve or whatever, and I just try and remember

0:46:06.040 --> 0:46:07.440
<v Speaker 3>that it's like live in the moment kind of.

0:46:07.840 --> 0:46:11.279
<v Speaker 1>I think that's really nice. Okay, Taylor Lawrence, what is

0:46:11.320 --> 0:46:13.120
<v Speaker 1>the smartest decision you've ever made.

0:46:14.960 --> 0:46:19.080
<v Speaker 3>To not listen to my parents and to pursue, you know,

0:46:19.239 --> 0:46:22.160
<v Speaker 3>to put a lot of myself out on the internet

0:46:22.200 --> 0:46:25.760
<v Speaker 3>and start a blog. Not that my parents were anti blog,

0:46:25.880 --> 0:46:29.960
<v Speaker 3>but they certainly, you know, they didn't. They didn't want

0:46:29.960 --> 0:46:31.840
<v Speaker 3>me to be a full time writer. They wanted me to, like,

0:46:32.040 --> 0:46:35.960
<v Speaker 3>you know, do a more corporate stable job. And I

0:46:36.000 --> 0:46:37.120
<v Speaker 3>was like, yeah, I'm going to do this.

0:46:37.560 --> 0:46:39.040
<v Speaker 1>Was it just like a gut instinct?

0:46:39.880 --> 0:46:42.840
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, I just kind of thought, what's the worst that

0:46:42.880 --> 0:46:46.640
<v Speaker 3>could happen? I was working retail, and so I thought,

0:46:46.800 --> 0:46:48.960
<v Speaker 3>worst case, I'll go back to retail. You know, I

0:46:49.000 --> 0:46:49.680
<v Speaker 3>know I'm good at that.

0:46:49.960 --> 0:46:53.319
<v Speaker 1>So you I almost have chills when you say that,

0:46:53.400 --> 0:46:57.719
<v Speaker 1>because you single handedly changed the industry. So the fact

0:46:57.760 --> 0:47:00.080
<v Speaker 1>that you just bet on yourself and went for it

0:47:00.120 --> 0:47:01.440
<v Speaker 1>is pretty remarkable.

0:47:02.040 --> 0:47:05.000
<v Speaker 3>Well, that means a lot. And I'm very privileged to

0:47:05.000 --> 0:47:06.520
<v Speaker 3>do that because not everyone could do that. I mean

0:47:06.560 --> 0:47:08.160
<v Speaker 3>I did have debt, and I do have debt, and

0:47:08.200 --> 0:47:10.440
<v Speaker 3>that was hard and it's not always been easy. But

0:47:11.080 --> 0:47:15.080
<v Speaker 3>I think you just got to try things, and it

0:47:15.080 --> 0:47:16.719
<v Speaker 3>doesn't work out. It doesn't work out. I don't know,

0:47:16.760 --> 0:47:18.879
<v Speaker 3>but you can't live life and regret, so I've always

0:47:18.920 --> 0:47:19.920
<v Speaker 3>tried to kind of live by that.

0:47:24.960 --> 0:47:28.120
<v Speaker 1>Okay, you know what time it is. Today's a good day.

0:47:28.360 --> 0:47:38.920
<v Speaker 1>To have a good day. I'll see you next week