WEBVTT - Draft Show: Stock Up, Stock Down

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:11.440
<v Speaker 1>The following is a production of Dallas Cowboys dot Com

0:00:11.480 --> 0:00:21.800
<v Speaker 1>and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club. Is the Dallas Cowboys

0:00:21.800 --> 0:00:26.680
<v Speaker 1>dot Com Draft Show, your war room for incenter news

0:00:26.720 --> 0:00:30.480
<v Speaker 1>and trapped analysis from deep within the confines of Cowboys

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:35.360
<v Speaker 1>headquarters at the Star in Frisco, Dallas, Sets, running back

0:00:36.080 --> 0:00:41.240
<v Speaker 1>and now your hosts David Hellman, Jeff Kavanaugh, Kevin Turner,

0:00:41.640 --> 0:00:48.239
<v Speaker 1>and Kyle Yeoman's. It's a beautiful Thursday in Frisco as

0:00:48.280 --> 0:00:50.680
<v Speaker 1>we're back in the Walling Star State, back in the

0:00:50.800 --> 0:00:54.600
<v Speaker 1>SWBC Mortgage studios, fresh off our trip from Indianapolis, and

0:00:54.720 --> 0:00:58.240
<v Speaker 1>more importantly, we are back with Jeff Cavanaugh and Kevin

0:00:58.240 --> 0:01:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Turner the Dallas Cowboys dot Com Draft Show. The Boys

0:01:01.040 --> 0:01:04.040
<v Speaker 1>are back in town. David Elman, Kyle Elman's myself as

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:07.960
<v Speaker 1>we continue to break down the NFL combine and exactly

0:01:08.000 --> 0:01:11.920
<v Speaker 1>what happened out in Indianapolis, how that affected everyone's draft stock,

0:01:12.000 --> 0:01:15.240
<v Speaker 1>and before we really get into the players, Jeff, I've

0:01:15.240 --> 0:01:18.560
<v Speaker 1>got to thank you because last time we were in

0:01:18.600 --> 0:01:22.800
<v Speaker 1>this room, you told me to take layers to Indianapolis.

0:01:22.800 --> 0:01:24.720
<v Speaker 1>I thought you're gonna say you went to the Slippery Noodle.

0:01:25.000 --> 0:01:27.360
<v Speaker 1>Oh we actually did that too. Yeah, so yeah, so

0:01:27.480 --> 0:01:29.600
<v Speaker 1>two things I could thank you for. You're welcome. But

0:01:29.640 --> 0:01:32.640
<v Speaker 1>we went to the slippery Noodle. We also took layers

0:01:32.680 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 1>and I went back and packed more layers after you

0:01:34.800 --> 0:01:36.399
<v Speaker 1>told me to do that, and I'm so glad that

0:01:36.440 --> 0:01:39.399
<v Speaker 1>I did. It was extremely cold. Yeah, INDI's colder. Do

0:01:39.400 --> 0:01:42.720
<v Speaker 1>you think numbers? We don't register numbers as people who

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:45.280
<v Speaker 1>live in DFW. You can see whatever numbers you want,

0:01:45.319 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 1>but that doesn't mean that you're actually gonna like register it.

0:01:48.360 --> 0:01:52.600
<v Speaker 1>Speak entirely for yourself, no, man, Yeah, listen, I have

0:01:52.640 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 1>a pretty firm grasp on what each temperature feels like.

0:01:55.800 --> 0:01:58.120
<v Speaker 1>I feel. I think, No, man, I don't know what

0:01:58.200 --> 0:02:02.080
<v Speaker 1>you're saying. Okay, I mean even with the temperature that was,

0:02:02.120 --> 0:02:04.120
<v Speaker 1>it was whenever we turned the corner, Dave and you

0:02:04.160 --> 0:02:06.320
<v Speaker 1>were a testament to this as well, when we would

0:02:06.320 --> 0:02:09.240
<v Speaker 1>turn the corner in the downtown street and get he

0:02:09.320 --> 0:02:12.280
<v Speaker 1>once fell in. He once fell down, laughing and refused

0:02:12.320 --> 0:02:14.480
<v Speaker 1>to keep walking. Years ago at the combine, he's telling

0:02:14.480 --> 0:02:16.440
<v Speaker 1>you that he has a weather stuff figured out. This

0:02:16.520 --> 0:02:19.040
<v Speaker 1>dude literally fell on the sidewalk and was giggling and

0:02:19.400 --> 0:02:21.440
<v Speaker 1>get up because he was so cold. That really did happen.

0:02:21.480 --> 0:02:24.600
<v Speaker 1>It was also minus five. There's a huge difference between

0:02:24.639 --> 0:02:27.080
<v Speaker 1>minus five and I don't know, it was like seventeen.

0:02:27.280 --> 0:02:29.480
<v Speaker 1>It feels like seven. I'm gonna say it was about

0:02:29.520 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 1>thirty with a wind chill of seventeen. Yeah, but that

0:02:32.760 --> 0:02:35.720
<v Speaker 1>is a true story. This was in ad I was

0:02:35.760 --> 0:02:38.840
<v Speaker 1>twenty fourteen. Yeah it was. It was below zero and

0:02:38.880 --> 0:02:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I thought I was going to die in the street.

0:02:40.400 --> 0:02:43.360
<v Speaker 1>A couple of lemonades. Okay, So there's a little bit

0:02:43.400 --> 0:02:46.520
<v Speaker 1>of liquid courage there as well. Sure, Okay, so that

0:02:46.560 --> 0:02:48.840
<v Speaker 1>played a little bit of a factor. Kat, How was

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:52.000
<v Speaker 1>your week? It was an excellent week. And I gotta admit,

0:02:52.080 --> 0:02:54.680
<v Speaker 1>we're under fifty days until the draft is here. Forty

0:02:54.760 --> 0:02:58.320
<v Speaker 1>nine and then the Combine just told me. You know,

0:02:58.360 --> 0:03:00.679
<v Speaker 1>you watched the Combine and you're like, okay, yeah, it

0:03:00.800 --> 0:03:03.840
<v Speaker 1>reaffirmed some things, but it also told me, oh god,

0:03:04.000 --> 0:03:06.239
<v Speaker 1>I need to go back and watch about forty guys,

0:03:06.520 --> 0:03:08.360
<v Speaker 1>because there's a lot of confusing things that happened at

0:03:08.360 --> 0:03:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the Combine. But I will take thirty degrees in Indianapolis.

0:03:11.320 --> 0:03:13.840
<v Speaker 1>And at the end of February, all day I felt like,

0:03:13.840 --> 0:03:16.200
<v Speaker 1>you guys got lucky. Yeah, it was away. It wasn't

0:03:16.240 --> 0:03:18.400
<v Speaker 1>that bad. But it was also the snow in the

0:03:18.400 --> 0:03:20.880
<v Speaker 1>wind that was the issue. Yeah, I think that was

0:03:20.919 --> 0:03:23.639
<v Speaker 1>the biggest thing. Yet I don't know yet. No, I

0:03:23.680 --> 0:03:26.520
<v Speaker 1>haven't yet. You gotta kept one of those negative one

0:03:26.600 --> 0:03:28.760
<v Speaker 1>hundred and eighty six days there in India before you

0:03:28.800 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 1>know well. And even if I did hit one of

0:03:30.760 --> 0:03:33.160
<v Speaker 1>those days, I was prepared thanks to you, because you

0:03:33.160 --> 0:03:35.160
<v Speaker 1>told me to take extra layers and I did. But

0:03:35.480 --> 0:03:38.760
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned some of the confusing parts of the combine

0:03:38.760 --> 0:03:41.080
<v Speaker 1>and trying to figure out exactly what some of these

0:03:41.120 --> 0:03:44.920
<v Speaker 1>prospects bring to the table. I thought now would be

0:03:45.040 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 1>a better time than any to go into some stock

0:03:49.080 --> 0:03:52.040
<v Speaker 1>up stock down between some of those players that we

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:55.200
<v Speaker 1>saw during the combine. Each of us have gone around,

0:03:55.240 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 1>given two guys that have had their stock risen over

0:03:57.840 --> 0:04:00.360
<v Speaker 1>the week in Indianapolis and two that had their stock

0:04:00.560 --> 0:04:03.120
<v Speaker 1>drop a little bit. And Jeff, we're gonna start with you.

0:04:03.200 --> 0:04:05.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's start with stock up, go around the table, and

0:04:05.160 --> 0:04:06.880
<v Speaker 1>then we'll do stock down here in a moment. Okay,

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:09.400
<v Speaker 1>did you build graphics? You a graphic building guy? Yeah,

0:04:09.440 --> 0:04:10.960
<v Speaker 1>I sent you three of each, so I made sure

0:04:11.000 --> 0:04:12.960
<v Speaker 1>to make it very confusing. So let me make sure

0:04:13.000 --> 0:04:15.040
<v Speaker 1>that I see which guys I actually got picked here

0:04:15.200 --> 0:04:20.080
<v Speaker 1>and then I'll tell you exactly hood oh oh god, wow, yeah,

0:04:20.080 --> 0:04:25.000
<v Speaker 1>stock up on these two Denzels. Denzel Mims good tape.

0:04:25.640 --> 0:04:29.320
<v Speaker 1>Then after having good tape, he went ahead and tore

0:04:29.480 --> 0:04:32.200
<v Speaker 1>the Senior Bowl. Then after tearing up the Senior Bowl,

0:04:32.200 --> 0:04:34.279
<v Speaker 1>he went and tested as an elite athlete. So for

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Denzel Mims, I think that probably took him from I

0:04:37.680 --> 0:04:40.520
<v Speaker 1>don't know. Before the Senior Bowl, people weren't really talking

0:04:40.680 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 1>like a middle round guy, maybe a fourth, fifth round guy.

0:04:43.480 --> 0:04:45.120
<v Speaker 1>And now there's probably no way he gets out of

0:04:45.120 --> 0:04:47.919
<v Speaker 1>the second So Denzel Mims stock all the way up.

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 1>That's my biggest frustration with Denzel Mims is a guy

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 1>who's the and I admit I'm this guy. I'm the

0:04:52.760 --> 0:04:58.960
<v Speaker 1>guy who if a band gets famous everyone's talking about.

0:04:57.560 --> 0:05:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Everyone's talking about about a TV show like st five

0:05:02.279 --> 0:05:04.400
<v Speaker 1>years after it was at like, oh now that parks

0:05:04.400 --> 0:05:06.760
<v Speaker 1>and records on Netflix, it could be everyone's favorite show.

0:05:06.760 --> 0:05:09.400
<v Speaker 1>It's like, no, I watched it from the beginning. Denzel Mims,

0:05:09.400 --> 0:05:11.479
<v Speaker 1>from the beginning, I had in the second round, so

0:05:11.480 --> 0:05:13.120
<v Speaker 1>so did I. You don't get to take him from

0:05:13.120 --> 0:05:14.760
<v Speaker 1>me just because you liked him, I know, but it's

0:05:14.760 --> 0:05:16.480
<v Speaker 1>just like the whole world's like all of a sudden, Oh,

0:05:16.680 --> 0:05:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Denzel Mims is pretty good, and I'm like, yeah, he

0:05:19.360 --> 0:05:23.479
<v Speaker 1>was good all year, like it happened works, I know,

0:05:23.600 --> 0:05:26.160
<v Speaker 1>and it's still frustrating. You're just now we've been doing

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:28.719
<v Speaker 1>this for six years. I used to be ahead of people. No,

0:05:28.880 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 1>I am used to it. It's just that one was

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:33.960
<v Speaker 1>a strange one because I never saw anything on tape

0:05:34.000 --> 0:05:38.800
<v Speaker 1>that was concerning No, there's nothing there. He single handedly

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:41.560
<v Speaker 1>get rid of the Baylor stereotype of their wide receivers

0:05:41.560 --> 0:05:45.279
<v Speaker 1>can only do three things like he's just he's awesome,

0:05:45.320 --> 0:05:48.400
<v Speaker 1>and the combine. I didn't know he's gonna blow it

0:05:48.480 --> 0:05:51.000
<v Speaker 1>up that much. Agin he was gonna do really good,

0:05:51.120 --> 0:05:52.680
<v Speaker 1>but I didn't know he's gonna blow it up that much.

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:55.440
<v Speaker 1>And it's just like such confirmation when there's a lot

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:58.480
<v Speaker 1>of people whose wide receiver group is Yes, it's crowded.

0:05:58.520 --> 0:06:00.760
<v Speaker 1>I understand that. I get that, but he has held

0:06:00.800 --> 0:06:02.640
<v Speaker 1>his own. Did you write in your notes when you

0:06:02.680 --> 0:06:06.479
<v Speaker 1>were watching mems this guy is an elite, elite, elite athlete. Uh,

0:06:06.560 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 1>you know what, I don't know what I wrote, Probably

0:06:10.120 --> 0:06:12.760
<v Speaker 1>not didn't write down, Oh no, and he's the best

0:06:12.800 --> 0:06:14.680
<v Speaker 1>athlete ever. And then he went to the combine, it's like, oh,

0:06:14.680 --> 0:06:16.760
<v Speaker 1>he's the best athlete every Yeah, he ran a top

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 1>five forty. People who don't like the combine like that's

0:06:19.560 --> 0:06:22.080
<v Speaker 1>the trap that people always fall into. It's like, oh,

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:24.000
<v Speaker 1>you're falling in love with this guy because he ran

0:06:24.040 --> 0:06:25.760
<v Speaker 1>a four four At the comment it's like, no, no,

0:06:25.960 --> 0:06:27.760
<v Speaker 1>but I already liked him. And when a guy who

0:06:27.800 --> 0:06:30.400
<v Speaker 1>looks good on tape goes out and posts those measurables,

0:06:30.440 --> 0:06:33.599
<v Speaker 1>it's just even more confirmation that you're you're sniffing in

0:06:33.600 --> 0:06:35.240
<v Speaker 1>the right direction. And I feel like that's where some

0:06:35.279 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 1>of the debate has come around the combine, And we

0:06:37.320 --> 0:06:40.640
<v Speaker 1>even talked about this a little last week with Dane saying,

0:06:41.200 --> 0:06:43.640
<v Speaker 1>what is important about the combine It has to be

0:06:43.680 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>supplemental to what you're already watching on film. He can't

0:06:46.600 --> 0:06:49.640
<v Speaker 1>be the only measurement. I think this is a perfect

0:06:49.279 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 1>example of film looks good and then he tears like

0:06:52.560 --> 0:06:54.120
<v Speaker 1>you said, tears up the Senior Bowl, and then he

0:06:54.120 --> 0:06:56.520
<v Speaker 1>does the same thing for the NFL Combine as well.

0:06:56.640 --> 0:06:58.800
<v Speaker 1>C J. Henderson was the same thing for CJ. Henderson

0:06:58.800 --> 0:07:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was just confirmation of everything that you

0:07:01.080 --> 0:07:04.560
<v Speaker 1>hoped that. He's you know, six one, he's over two

0:07:04.680 --> 0:07:08.440
<v Speaker 1>hundred pounds, he's running in the four threes, great jumps,

0:07:08.640 --> 0:07:13.000
<v Speaker 1>So you're just partnering great tape with great measurables. You go, Okay, seventeen,

0:07:13.240 --> 0:07:16.000
<v Speaker 1>that works well. CJ. Henderson scares me a little bit,

0:07:16.200 --> 0:07:19.000
<v Speaker 1>and not in a good way. Well, what I'm trying

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:20.960
<v Speaker 1>to say is we I mean we all we all

0:07:21.000 --> 0:07:24.200
<v Speaker 1>like him, right, absolutely? Yes, he's been my cornerback three

0:07:24.320 --> 0:07:27.520
<v Speaker 1>pretty much the whole time. He's six one, two oh four.

0:07:27.800 --> 0:07:31.160
<v Speaker 1>And he goes out and puts that up on tape, which, again,

0:07:31.240 --> 0:07:33.440
<v Speaker 1>like his tape was already good. Oh you're word, he's

0:07:33.440 --> 0:07:36.520
<v Speaker 1>gonna be gone. Yeah. Absolutely, Seventeen. When you do a

0:07:36.560 --> 0:07:39.440
<v Speaker 1>workout like that at that size, on top of already

0:07:39.440 --> 0:07:41.480
<v Speaker 1>being considered one of the two or three best corners

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:44.720
<v Speaker 1>in the class, that is a money position. That is

0:07:44.760 --> 0:07:48.640
<v Speaker 1>a spot where you know people value cornerback as they should. Well,

0:07:48.640 --> 0:07:51.559
<v Speaker 1>I would tell the top sixteen teams the guy didn't

0:07:51.560 --> 0:07:54.040
<v Speaker 1>really like to tackle. You don't want that guy. He

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:56.800
<v Speaker 1>didn't really like to tackle. He's you know, he's great

0:07:56.840 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 1>in coverage. Does anybody care, Well, I want the other

0:07:59.040 --> 0:08:02.120
<v Speaker 1>sixteen teams to Okay, is it cornerback the position that

0:08:02.160 --> 0:08:04.800
<v Speaker 1>you're less worried about tackling than any other position on

0:08:04.840 --> 0:08:08.560
<v Speaker 1>the gladly? And then the other side of my brain

0:08:08.720 --> 0:08:11.360
<v Speaker 1>is going, you go usk Bill Belichick and Nick Sabe

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:13.520
<v Speaker 1>and two guys that don't really like personally but like,

0:08:14.640 --> 0:08:17.320
<v Speaker 1>but they go, oh yeah, I just draft guys who

0:08:17.320 --> 0:08:20.120
<v Speaker 1>can tackle. You'll be fine guys who can tackle. And

0:08:20.120 --> 0:08:22.360
<v Speaker 1>that's where I always go. I do have to knock

0:08:22.440 --> 0:08:24.520
<v Speaker 1>him for tackling. I do have to knock him. But

0:08:25.040 --> 0:08:27.440
<v Speaker 1>you never see anyone runaway from him. He played in

0:08:27.680 --> 0:08:31.920
<v Speaker 1>top flight competition, and you know what, the interceptions maybe

0:08:31.920 --> 0:08:34.079
<v Speaker 1>you aren't there, you know, Okay, I love it. I'm

0:08:34.080 --> 0:08:37.080
<v Speaker 1>showing highlights even his sacks. They're so gentle. He's like,

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:39.000
<v Speaker 1>hold on, I don't really want to hit. Just fall

0:08:39.000 --> 0:08:43.240
<v Speaker 1>down for me. Thank you. I've got a highly drafted

0:08:43.280 --> 0:08:46.600
<v Speaker 1>linebacker and a highly paid linebacker now and Jalen Smith

0:08:46.679 --> 0:08:48.400
<v Speaker 1>to go and make those tackles on the outside and

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:50.319
<v Speaker 1>help out there. So good point. You know. I can

0:08:50.400 --> 0:08:52.160
<v Speaker 1>use those guys. Oh and we may we may address

0:08:52.200 --> 0:08:54.720
<v Speaker 1>the safety position too, so we can get some help

0:08:54.720 --> 0:08:57.400
<v Speaker 1>with the tackling problem, and that was the biggest worry

0:08:57.440 --> 0:09:00.320
<v Speaker 1>for me. Is one just the numbers that he put up,

0:09:00.320 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 1>I mean a four three, nine forty, the third best

0:09:02.240 --> 0:09:04.440
<v Speaker 1>out of all corners. He was the sixth best vertical.

0:09:04.679 --> 0:09:06.360
<v Speaker 1>And then he was also much taller than he was

0:09:06.360 --> 0:09:09.040
<v Speaker 1>originally listed. I mean he ended up being measured at

0:09:09.040 --> 0:09:12.040
<v Speaker 1>what it was, six foot and three fourths and originally

0:09:12.120 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 1>he was five eleven off of Florida's measurements. Oh did

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:18.000
<v Speaker 1>they show seven? They said five eleven? At least that's

0:09:18.000 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 1>what I had. The first team say they undersold. First

0:09:21.360 --> 0:09:24.200
<v Speaker 1>college to undersell a player. Yeah, a top notch guy,

0:09:24.200 --> 0:09:26.840
<v Speaker 1>a first round town us grown a lot for That's

0:09:26.880 --> 0:09:28.720
<v Speaker 1>what it was. Katie. Who was your stock up? Were

0:09:28.720 --> 0:09:33.719
<v Speaker 1>they trying to get him to stay for another year? Hey,

0:09:33.720 --> 0:09:35.800
<v Speaker 1>if you come back, we'll give you another two inches?

0:09:36.440 --> 0:09:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Um my stock up? I'm pull up my text message here.

0:09:40.640 --> 0:09:43.240
<v Speaker 1>Well I haven't in the graphics everyone, sorry? Uh so,

0:09:43.720 --> 0:09:47.600
<v Speaker 1>oh I have stuck. Oh we stopped, we went down.

0:09:48.840 --> 0:09:50.560
<v Speaker 1>Hold on, let's make it about me, everybody. Let's make

0:09:50.600 --> 0:09:54.520
<v Speaker 1>about seven. Now tell me if you guys are gonna

0:09:54.600 --> 0:09:58.120
<v Speaker 1>kill me for this. Derek Brown, Derek Brown had an

0:09:58.120 --> 0:10:00.959
<v Speaker 1>atrocious workout. Yes, he did to come the three cone

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:03.880
<v Speaker 1>was the worst defensive lineman three cone. The jumps were bad, Yeah,

0:10:03.960 --> 0:10:08.080
<v Speaker 1>forty was slow. Everything about that workout was bad. His

0:10:08.240 --> 0:10:12.040
<v Speaker 1>tape is awesome. But let me just let me just

0:10:12.120 --> 0:10:14.319
<v Speaker 1>riddle me this entertain me for a second. Are you

0:10:14.360 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 1>trying you entertained me? First? Are you telling me there's

0:10:18.200 --> 0:10:22.600
<v Speaker 1>no chance that an interior guy who's not a great

0:10:22.640 --> 0:10:25.360
<v Speaker 1>pass rusher and had a terrible workout, you're telling me

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:28.559
<v Speaker 1>there's no chance that makes it to seventeen. I'm a

0:10:28.559 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 1>four SAT guy with a terrible workout. It's a run stopper.

0:10:31.600 --> 0:10:32.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to go as far as to say

0:10:32.800 --> 0:10:35.559
<v Speaker 1>there's no chance, but I don't think. I don't think

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:38.160
<v Speaker 1>he'll fall that far because and I think the dreams alive,

0:10:38.720 --> 0:10:44.319
<v Speaker 1>alive but still not like healthy, But I think the

0:10:44.400 --> 0:10:46.240
<v Speaker 1>dreams alive, and I don't know if it's a dream.

0:10:46.800 --> 0:10:49.040
<v Speaker 1>Do you think how many sacks do you would you

0:10:49.120 --> 0:10:52.360
<v Speaker 1>guess Derek Brown will have in an average year somewhere

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:56.440
<v Speaker 1>between three and eight. Yeah, it's a really that's a

0:10:56.440 --> 0:10:58.600
<v Speaker 1>good range. I mean that is a big range. It's

0:10:58.600 --> 0:11:00.400
<v Speaker 1>a huge range. Can I get you to own by

0:11:00.400 --> 0:11:05.839
<v Speaker 1>like one. Okay, guys, you come team all the time,

0:11:06.640 --> 0:11:09.520
<v Speaker 1>a four to six set guy top ten and if

0:11:09.520 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 1>it's your team doing it, are you like all right? Yes?

0:11:12.920 --> 0:11:15.400
<v Speaker 1>How good a run player? Is he? Run player? He

0:11:17.080 --> 0:11:19.840
<v Speaker 1>was a game changer of the defensive line, Yes he is.

0:11:20.160 --> 0:11:21.800
<v Speaker 1>It's a good question. So here now, here's here's what

0:11:21.920 --> 0:11:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I think the Snakes Harrison keeps getting flipped for fifth

0:11:24.600 --> 0:11:27.360
<v Speaker 1>round picks. That's what I'm saying. And at the time

0:11:27.400 --> 0:11:29.240
<v Speaker 1>he was one of the best run defenders in the league.

0:11:29.640 --> 0:11:30.880
<v Speaker 1>But we want to take one of the top ten.

0:11:30.920 --> 0:11:32.959
<v Speaker 1>I'm just asking. No, I hear you. That's my secret

0:11:33.000 --> 0:11:36.520
<v Speaker 1>is I just ask opinion? My biggest My biggest question

0:11:36.600 --> 0:11:38.920
<v Speaker 1>is is counseling, Like why did he work out? He

0:11:38.920 --> 0:11:43.199
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't have worked out, like Javon Kinwall. Now the defense

0:11:43.200 --> 0:11:45.640
<v Speaker 1>attackle from South Carolina. Now is a chance to get

0:11:45.679 --> 0:11:47.559
<v Speaker 1>in front of Derek Brown kind of what you're saying here.

0:11:48.000 --> 0:11:49.880
<v Speaker 1>You know what he did. He did not work out.

0:11:50.040 --> 0:11:52.520
<v Speaker 1>That's smart because he knew there was nothing you could

0:11:52.559 --> 0:11:55.280
<v Speaker 1>gain from that, and Derek Brown could have only lost ground.

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:57.280
<v Speaker 1>He should have worked out, I was I mean, if

0:11:57.320 --> 0:12:00.640
<v Speaker 1>he knew that his numbers were gonna slightly resemble that.

0:12:00.720 --> 0:12:02.679
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why he would either, because it's not like,

0:12:03.200 --> 0:12:04.880
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's not like he put up numbers where

0:12:04.880 --> 0:12:06.720
<v Speaker 1>you're like, well this isn't great, Like he was the

0:12:06.760 --> 0:12:10.400
<v Speaker 1>worst in in class. He was. He brought up the caboose. Yeah,

0:12:10.440 --> 0:12:14.400
<v Speaker 1>he was worst workout, which nold class. But it's it's

0:12:14.400 --> 0:12:17.600
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating conversation because you said, I mean it, he

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:20.360
<v Speaker 1>doesn't look like that on tape. No, he looks amazing

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:24.760
<v Speaker 1>on tape against you know, sec caliber talent, chasing guys down,

0:12:25.480 --> 0:12:29.800
<v Speaker 1>beaten blockers, beating double teams. And I just think if

0:12:30.440 --> 0:12:33.560
<v Speaker 1>we would agree tape, Trump's all right, trust the tape

0:12:33.720 --> 0:12:37.960
<v Speaker 1>tape tape is number one. So what I think is that,

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:40.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, we thought Derek Brown was probably a top

0:12:40.440 --> 0:12:44.160
<v Speaker 1>five pick when the draft cycle started. Now I think

0:12:44.200 --> 0:12:48.160
<v Speaker 1>he's probably more like somewhere between eight and twelve. I

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:50.360
<v Speaker 1>still don't know if he gets all the way to seventeen.

0:12:50.559 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 1>Just became in. The quarterbacks, you're gonna go, right, we

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:55.679
<v Speaker 1>get we get a really good vibe the quarterbacks. You're

0:12:55.679 --> 0:12:58.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna go Chase Young is gonna go four. Offensive tackles

0:12:58.080 --> 0:12:59.760
<v Speaker 1>are going to go up there at least three ot

0:13:00.160 --> 0:13:02.600
<v Speaker 1>before the Cowboys. Isaiah, to me, he's still in that

0:13:02.679 --> 0:13:07.200
<v Speaker 1>group of Chase Young Isaiah Simmons Okuda, I really don't

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:09.800
<v Speaker 1>think that changes. It wouldn't surprise the second tier guy

0:13:09.920 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 1>with like a kin Law back there. Well, I mean

0:13:11.800 --> 0:13:14.200
<v Speaker 1>it looks let me push you just because the quarterbacks

0:13:14.200 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 1>are coming up, But I still think he's in that

0:13:15.679 --> 0:13:19.240
<v Speaker 1>first tier guy with this Now is our team's gonna

0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:21.240
<v Speaker 1>like maybe value kin Law a little more after they

0:13:21.240 --> 0:13:23.920
<v Speaker 1>see kin Laws Pro Day and then maybe that maybe

0:13:23.960 --> 0:13:25.959
<v Speaker 1>things change a little bit. I mean, he is in

0:13:26.040 --> 0:13:28.760
<v Speaker 1>the first percentile Derek Brown in the first percentile of

0:13:29.160 --> 0:13:31.440
<v Speaker 1>three cone drill. But I ain't asking him to rush

0:13:31.480 --> 0:13:33.360
<v Speaker 1>off the edge, but he don't need him to be

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:35.680
<v Speaker 1>a little flexible. But he's a taking he's a d

0:13:35.840 --> 0:13:38.920
<v Speaker 1>tackle and he specializes against the run like I don't

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:41.240
<v Speaker 1>know how much bend I need him to have. And

0:13:41.280 --> 0:13:44.280
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't just make plays right there like you see

0:13:44.360 --> 0:13:47.320
<v Speaker 1>him track plays down laterally like this range as a

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:50.400
<v Speaker 1>defensive tackle. Absolutely, that's what he doesn't look like that

0:13:50.440 --> 0:13:52.120
<v Speaker 1>bad of an athlete on tape, which is why it

0:13:52.160 --> 0:13:54.199
<v Speaker 1>was so shocking to see him post such bad time.

0:13:54.320 --> 0:13:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I guess always go sometimes why I do as I

0:13:57.000 --> 0:13:58.720
<v Speaker 1>go to myke. What was my instant reaction, Not that

0:13:58.760 --> 0:14:00.640
<v Speaker 1>it's always right, it's always to think on him. My

0:14:00.679 --> 0:14:03.800
<v Speaker 1>instant reaction when I saw his numbers were okay, and

0:14:03.880 --> 0:14:05.800
<v Speaker 1>my instant reaction for some other guys when so other

0:14:05.880 --> 0:14:09.560
<v Speaker 1>numbers was oh god, oh no and one, I can't

0:14:09.600 --> 0:14:12.800
<v Speaker 1>go ahead for him, I wasn't concerned for aj epines

0:14:12.880 --> 0:14:18.760
<v Speaker 1>I went, oh god, we can. Epinesta tested himself out

0:14:18.800 --> 0:14:22.280
<v Speaker 1>of the first round. Whoa, that's a big statement. He

0:14:22.440 --> 0:14:24.760
<v Speaker 1>tested himself out of me wanting him in the first

0:14:24.840 --> 0:14:29.400
<v Speaker 1>round seventeen. I think he'll probably goes. He'll go, but

0:14:29.480 --> 0:14:32.000
<v Speaker 1>over five seconds in the forty and seven point three

0:14:32.040 --> 0:14:34.640
<v Speaker 1>in the three cone at two hundred and seventy five pounds.

0:14:35.280 --> 0:14:37.960
<v Speaker 1>I think he played his way into a three four defense.

0:14:38.320 --> 0:14:41.520
<v Speaker 1>I think he played three four end. So maybe a

0:14:41.560 --> 0:14:43.800
<v Speaker 1>team at the back of one wants him. But I

0:14:43.920 --> 0:14:46.720
<v Speaker 1>just I would worry about that athletic profile is an

0:14:46.720 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 1>outside rusher. And to your point and why it worries

0:14:49.840 --> 0:14:51.880
<v Speaker 1>with him and not with Derek Brown, because it's the

0:14:51.920 --> 0:14:54.920
<v Speaker 1>same thing on tape on tape watching Jinesa, you go,

0:14:54.960 --> 0:14:58.400
<v Speaker 1>oh man, heavy handed stout find his overpowers people to

0:14:58.440 --> 0:15:00.920
<v Speaker 1>the quarterback. But you're no what you're gonna say somewhere,

0:15:01.320 --> 0:15:03.480
<v Speaker 1>can't really turn the corner. Don't see him turn the corner,

0:15:03.480 --> 0:15:06.280
<v Speaker 1>don't see him went outside? And then you test you go, well,

0:15:07.120 --> 0:15:10.360
<v Speaker 1>not really capable of pointing outside. No, that's not a

0:15:10.360 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>first round pass rusher to me, that's so we just

0:15:12.920 --> 0:15:15.160
<v Speaker 1>said the same thing. You acted like crazy. But I

0:15:15.200 --> 0:15:17.040
<v Speaker 1>think he will go I think he'll go there maybe

0:15:17.040 --> 0:15:19.720
<v Speaker 1>and maybe in the put it this way like he's

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 1>not he won't be a top twenty pick. I don't

0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:25.080
<v Speaker 1>think with Aka, you know, I think you can scratch

0:15:25.360 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't want to speak for them, but I think

0:15:26.760 --> 0:15:30.600
<v Speaker 1>you can scratch him off the list of possibilities at seventeen?

0:15:30.640 --> 0:15:33.400
<v Speaker 1>What was Tacos three? Want to know? I don't want

0:15:33.400 --> 0:15:36.120
<v Speaker 1>to know. The Cowboys were as bad as a pick

0:15:36.200 --> 0:15:39.800
<v Speaker 1>as it looks now. The Cowboys were picking eleven spots

0:15:39.840 --> 0:15:41.880
<v Speaker 1>behind where they are now. So you're talking about a

0:15:41.920 --> 0:15:45.160
<v Speaker 1>different caliber of prospect too. Tacos three code was seven

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:51.160
<v Speaker 1>point one seven, you know, oh, no better than the

0:15:52.480 --> 0:15:57.200
<v Speaker 1>three count seven three? Okay, you know DeMarcus Lawrence, Zadarius Smith.

0:15:57.240 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>Those guys ran seven four three count thrill. So it's

0:15:59.680 --> 0:16:04.600
<v Speaker 1>not in all he needs to be trade flowers. Yeah,

0:16:04.600 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 1>it gets combining the numbers with the tape again, the

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:09.080
<v Speaker 1>tape told you what they were. The tape with the

0:16:09.120 --> 0:16:11.440
<v Speaker 1>Marcus Lawrence told you this guy's getting juice off the edge,

0:16:11.800 --> 0:16:14.320
<v Speaker 1>you know. So like you know what the tape on

0:16:14.440 --> 0:16:17.040
<v Speaker 1>Zadarius Smith back in the day at Kentucky, you didn't

0:16:17.040 --> 0:16:19.880
<v Speaker 1>really necessarily see the strength that he's that he's added

0:16:19.960 --> 0:16:22.960
<v Speaker 1>sure to his game. But that's I think this is

0:16:22.960 --> 0:16:25.920
<v Speaker 1>where the draft becomes real fun, the little games of

0:16:25.920 --> 0:16:29.440
<v Speaker 1>position value, the games of death at the position, because

0:16:29.440 --> 0:16:32.320
<v Speaker 1>that's where Epinessa, to me, stays in the first round.

0:16:32.760 --> 0:16:34.240
<v Speaker 1>Might have got a second round grade on him and

0:16:34.280 --> 0:16:36.800
<v Speaker 1>have the whole time, but I think he ends up

0:16:36.840 --> 0:16:39.560
<v Speaker 1>going in the first round because look, there ain't a

0:16:39.600 --> 0:16:43.440
<v Speaker 1>ton of edge players. Um. I mean, are you excited

0:16:43.520 --> 0:16:48.000
<v Speaker 1>right now about gross Matos that much over Epinessa right now?

0:16:48.120 --> 0:16:50.120
<v Speaker 1>I'm not. I think he would take him over him.

0:16:50.120 --> 0:16:52.760
<v Speaker 1>I think he's got more upside. Are you like excited

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:54.840
<v Speaker 1>to do that? There? Are you? Like? Well? Hugged down?

0:16:54.920 --> 0:16:58.160
<v Speaker 1>Let's go where maybe you trade back to twenty one,

0:16:58.240 --> 0:17:00.640
<v Speaker 1>Maybe you trade back to twenty five. Be high on

0:17:00.680 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 1>this edge class as a whole, though, I would feel better.

0:17:03.040 --> 0:17:05.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't think this is a good edge class. I

0:17:05.080 --> 0:17:08.399
<v Speaker 1>don't love Grossmatos, but I would feel better about drafting

0:17:08.480 --> 0:17:11.320
<v Speaker 1>him than Epinessa just because I think there's a better

0:17:11.400 --> 0:17:14.000
<v Speaker 1>chance that he develops into a more explosive player. Yes,

0:17:14.440 --> 0:17:17.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think Epinessa is going to grow tremendously as

0:17:17.040 --> 0:17:20.560
<v Speaker 1>like that. That's an athlete in the NFL. Well, you

0:17:20.640 --> 0:17:23.200
<v Speaker 1>had an edge rusher that was pretty high on your list,

0:17:23.240 --> 0:17:27.439
<v Speaker 1>stock up your kat Oh, mister Curtis Weaver out of

0:17:27.480 --> 0:17:29.640
<v Speaker 1>Boisey State. Now this one was a weird one, right.

0:17:29.960 --> 0:17:32.240
<v Speaker 1>His numbers were pretty wild. When you look at Curtis Weaver,

0:17:32.800 --> 0:17:35.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean the seven second three cone. I didn't see

0:17:35.119 --> 0:17:37.119
<v Speaker 1>that coming from him if you watch it on tape.

0:17:37.560 --> 0:17:40.480
<v Speaker 1>To me, you didn't really seem turned very much. So

0:17:40.560 --> 0:17:42.880
<v Speaker 1>when he put up that number, I was like, huh

0:17:42.920 --> 0:17:44.879
<v Speaker 1>So to me, that was shocking. Was that shocking to you,

0:17:45.000 --> 0:17:49.639
<v Speaker 1>Jeff Um? Not shocking? I would say I was curious

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:52.080
<v Speaker 1>with his three connel because he went outside a lot. Well,

0:17:52.160 --> 0:17:55.960
<v Speaker 1>he was also running around terrible offensive was just going around. Yeah,

0:17:56.000 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 1>he went with a radius around players rather than edging

0:17:59.680 --> 0:18:02.359
<v Speaker 1>and and kind of cutting that off and going around guys.

0:18:02.400 --> 0:18:04.679
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I just thought he was pretty stiff, and

0:18:04.720 --> 0:18:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean you can still be kind of stiff and

0:18:06.720 --> 0:18:08.359
<v Speaker 1>turned the corner a little bit, I guess. But the

0:18:08.359 --> 0:18:11.199
<v Speaker 1>three cone number to be at seven seconds, to me,

0:18:11.320 --> 0:18:13.720
<v Speaker 1>that was a you know, and look, I don't know.

0:18:14.000 --> 0:18:16.119
<v Speaker 1>This is another thing with the edge class being what

0:18:16.240 --> 0:18:19.440
<v Speaker 1>it is. I have so many more questions about who

0:18:19.600 --> 0:18:24.359
<v Speaker 1>Julian Julian o'quire is from Notre Dame. I have so

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:28.240
<v Speaker 1>many questions about what Kalid Kareem is from Notre Dame. Um.

0:18:28.600 --> 0:18:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I feel pretty good about you know, Jonathan Greener to

0:18:31.000 --> 0:18:34.359
<v Speaker 1>Florida and like the second round. I like him showing

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:38.280
<v Speaker 1>with Weaver. I feel much better about knowing what he is.

0:18:38.520 --> 0:18:41.280
<v Speaker 1>Doesn't mean I'm going out of my mind and draft

0:18:41.359 --> 0:18:44.000
<v Speaker 1>him in the first round or anything. Yeah, but you know,

0:18:44.119 --> 0:18:47.159
<v Speaker 1>maybe he's talked himself or got himself in that second

0:18:47.280 --> 0:18:49.600
<v Speaker 1>round territory where maybe he was gonna go on the

0:18:49.640 --> 0:18:51.920
<v Speaker 1>third round. You know. So I thought he did well

0:18:51.920 --> 0:18:54.119
<v Speaker 1>for himself on that three cone drill. And who was

0:18:54.160 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 1>my other player on the oh, Chase Claypool talking about

0:18:57.359 --> 0:19:00.080
<v Speaker 1>Notre dame guys Okay, on tape, I didn't see a

0:19:00.160 --> 0:19:02.800
<v Speaker 1>guy who was running four four five and when he

0:19:02.880 --> 0:19:06.440
<v Speaker 1>ran that, I was pretty shocked. I was impressive, man,

0:19:07.000 --> 0:19:08.920
<v Speaker 1>I didn't I don't know why I didn't see that coming.

0:19:08.920 --> 0:19:10.800
<v Speaker 1>I mean you look, you could see like the figure

0:19:10.960 --> 0:19:14.320
<v Speaker 1>on you'd see his body and his friend's big. Well,

0:19:14.520 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>like you see his body and his frame and goes,

0:19:16.000 --> 0:19:17.879
<v Speaker 1>it's a big dude. Okay, he's pretty jacked, and then

0:19:17.920 --> 0:19:19.920
<v Speaker 1>you go, what are you rann at four four five?

0:19:20.359 --> 0:19:22.320
<v Speaker 1>And I just didn't see that like on. To me,

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:24.760
<v Speaker 1>he was a slow player on four four two four

0:19:24.840 --> 0:19:28.080
<v Speaker 1>four two seegeez on tape. To me, he was a

0:19:28.119 --> 0:19:30.520
<v Speaker 1>slow player. I didn't see him out running people on tape.

0:19:30.600 --> 0:19:32.159
<v Speaker 1>I saw him and I was on the outside. He

0:19:32.240 --> 0:19:34.920
<v Speaker 1>was kind of a excuse me. He was kind of

0:19:34.920 --> 0:19:36.639
<v Speaker 1>a just run down the field and we'll throw it

0:19:36.680 --> 0:19:38.760
<v Speaker 1>up to you on little corners and then moved to

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the slot and we'll run you on crossers. I didn't

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:45.560
<v Speaker 1>see a burner. Um. I think he did this right.

0:19:46.080 --> 0:19:48.200
<v Speaker 1>He did the combine right. Oh yeah, like Derek Brown,

0:19:48.240 --> 0:19:49.720
<v Speaker 1>if you know that you're not gonna do well and something,

0:19:49.760 --> 0:19:52.560
<v Speaker 1>don't do it. So Claypool gets to be a giant winner.

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:54.879
<v Speaker 1>He's a big guy that ran fast and jumped for

0:19:55.240 --> 0:19:57.240
<v Speaker 1>If he'd ran the shuttles, I bet you it wouldn't

0:19:57.240 --> 0:19:59.159
<v Speaker 1>have gone well. So instead of coming out of the the

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 1>combine saying, Wow, what a great combine, you would going

0:20:01.800 --> 0:20:04.639
<v Speaker 1>oh wow, goodness. Straight line not so much in the agilities,

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:06.479
<v Speaker 1>but you get to skip all that if you just

0:20:06.480 --> 0:20:09.880
<v Speaker 1>don't do what you're bad at, which that's what I want,

0:20:09.960 --> 0:20:12.160
<v Speaker 1>And it's interesting because you want to use it all

0:20:12.320 --> 0:20:15.240
<v Speaker 1>to put the whole puzzle together. How much does it

0:20:15.320 --> 0:20:17.240
<v Speaker 1>change your opinion of him at all? It doesn't sound

0:20:17.280 --> 0:20:21.480
<v Speaker 1>like it does little. I think the forty time is impressive,

0:20:21.520 --> 0:20:24.840
<v Speaker 1>that lower body explosion is impressive, But I still think

0:20:24.880 --> 0:20:27.880
<v Speaker 1>that he's not a separator. I think too often he's

0:20:27.880 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 1>a body catcher. Okay, so I could see. But with

0:20:31.960 --> 0:20:34.399
<v Speaker 1>the athletic upside that he just showed you, could you

0:20:34.440 --> 0:20:38.280
<v Speaker 1>take him into two early three? Somebody probably will. Well.

0:20:38.320 --> 0:20:40.400
<v Speaker 1>This is also a conversation that we have last week

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:43.000
<v Speaker 1>as well, but bringing you guys into it. Tight end

0:20:43.040 --> 0:20:45.600
<v Speaker 1>has been floated around for this guy. I meant on

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 1>my dreams the size of him, and honestly, I thought

0:20:48.760 --> 0:20:51.480
<v Speaker 1>whenever I initially looked at these numbers, I thought of

0:20:51.480 --> 0:20:53.639
<v Speaker 1>a guy that maybe proved that he should be a

0:20:53.680 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver. But at the same time, this is not

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:59.480
<v Speaker 1>a very high, highly touted tight end class, at least

0:21:00.160 --> 0:21:02.399
<v Speaker 1>from a depth perspective. He could be another name that

0:21:02.440 --> 0:21:04.000
<v Speaker 1>you could throw in there and throw it tight end,

0:21:04.560 --> 0:21:07.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, as long as you're not actually asking him

0:21:07.200 --> 0:21:10.320
<v Speaker 1>to play tight end. Yeah that's what. Yeah, I don't

0:21:10.320 --> 0:21:12.760
<v Speaker 1>really know the difference anymore, because what do you like?

0:21:12.840 --> 0:21:14.600
<v Speaker 1>You can put him on the roster is whichever one

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:16.880
<v Speaker 1>you want. But if you're talking about playing a detached slot,

0:21:17.520 --> 0:21:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't care. What would you rather have him? Or

0:21:20.080 --> 0:21:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Hunter Bryant from Washington's the same? This is the question

0:21:23.040 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 1>comes and that's where I go. Man, I think I

0:21:25.880 --> 0:21:28.439
<v Speaker 1>think Hunter Bryant's a better player. But his combine was

0:21:28.560 --> 0:21:31.280
<v Speaker 1>a little disappointed, was good. His drops make me nervous.

0:21:31.320 --> 0:21:33.840
<v Speaker 1>I just don't trust Chase Claypool from Notre Dame to

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:36.800
<v Speaker 1>go get open and that bothers me. But there ain't

0:21:36.840 --> 0:21:40.840
<v Speaker 1>many six four two thirty guys running four four twos. Yeah,

0:21:40.880 --> 0:21:42.879
<v Speaker 1>I mean it was a freakish combine for him. When

0:21:43.080 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 1>terms of that, that one forty time. Maybe you're putting

0:21:45.760 --> 0:21:47.280
<v Speaker 1>a little two I'm putting a little too much stock

0:21:47.320 --> 0:21:50.800
<v Speaker 1>in his forty time. But Chase Claypool ran a half

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:55.080
<v Speaker 1>a second faster forty than Hunter Bryant. And the difference,

0:21:55.119 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean, he's Claypools two inches taller and only like

0:21:58.160 --> 0:22:00.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, well, Claypool also ten pounds, like a

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:03.760
<v Speaker 1>better forty than Michael Pittman Junior. Talk about another big

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:06.679
<v Speaker 1>bodied receiver. Yeah, but Michael Pittman Junior has two hands,

0:22:06.920 --> 0:22:08.840
<v Speaker 1>that's fair, and he can block a little bit. I

0:22:08.840 --> 0:22:11.719
<v Speaker 1>get Claypool is out here running deep balls and catching

0:22:11.720 --> 0:22:15.359
<v Speaker 1>contested balls in his number like jump up over you

0:22:15.400 --> 0:22:21.159
<v Speaker 1>and then like can we please extend and catch the ball? Sorry,

0:22:21.320 --> 0:22:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Chase Claypool. I hope you get drafted real high and

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:26.480
<v Speaker 1>make all the money. All right, Dave, Yeah, who you

0:22:26.520 --> 0:22:28.960
<v Speaker 1>got for your stock up? Stock ups? One guy, which

0:22:29.040 --> 0:22:31.600
<v Speaker 1>this guy I actually like. He slipped under the radar

0:22:31.680 --> 0:22:35.000
<v Speaker 1>for me, for me personally, probably because he's FCS. I

0:22:35.080 --> 0:22:37.920
<v Speaker 1>like to ignore FCS guys the Cowboys. The Cowboys don't

0:22:37.960 --> 0:22:41.400
<v Speaker 1>draft him. Had a fantastic senior Bowl, looked great out there,

0:22:41.560 --> 0:22:43.439
<v Speaker 1>and he kind of caught our eye a little bit

0:22:43.440 --> 0:22:46.120
<v Speaker 1>at the Senior Bowl. This is really mean. I think

0:22:46.119 --> 0:22:49.639
<v Speaker 1>of Obi Melifonwu from a few years ago, Like everybody's

0:22:49.640 --> 0:22:52.119
<v Speaker 1>just always enamored with the six three safety. I'm not

0:22:52.160 --> 0:22:55.320
<v Speaker 1>comparing their games, sure, but everybody's always enamored with the

0:22:55.640 --> 0:22:59.800
<v Speaker 1>with the superhero action figure safety. Right, Chen looks the

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:02.600
<v Speaker 1>art and he goes out here on top of looking

0:23:02.600 --> 0:23:06.480
<v Speaker 1>good at the Senior Bowl four four five forty at

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:10.240
<v Speaker 1>his size six three two twenty a forty one inch vertical,

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:14.080
<v Speaker 1>he actually outperformed Kyle Dugger in a couple areas of

0:23:14.119 --> 0:23:16.280
<v Speaker 1>the combined workout. I think vertical was the only one

0:23:16.320 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 1>he didn't out. Yeah, Dugger, absolutely. You know, I'm distrustful

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:26.320
<v Speaker 1>of guys of fcs. He's coming out of Southern Um,

0:23:26.480 --> 0:23:28.720
<v Speaker 1>Southern Illinois for those of y'all that don't know the

0:23:28.760 --> 0:23:31.920
<v Speaker 1>sulukis so looks good on tape. Of course he does,

0:23:31.960 --> 0:23:34.760
<v Speaker 1>because he's a superior athlete to everybody else. Then he

0:23:34.800 --> 0:23:36.920
<v Speaker 1>goes to the Senior Bowl and plays well against other

0:23:37.000 --> 0:23:41.400
<v Speaker 1>top notch draftable competition. Then he puts this workout on tape,

0:23:41.920 --> 0:23:44.200
<v Speaker 1>and it's I mean, how could you argue that his

0:23:44.240 --> 0:23:46.840
<v Speaker 1>stock isn't going up. It's really impressive. It feels very

0:23:46.880 --> 0:23:50.600
<v Speaker 1>leap of faith for me. These NFL teams are gonna

0:23:50.640 --> 0:23:52.879
<v Speaker 1>think I have one all twenty two game of him

0:23:52.920 --> 0:23:55.840
<v Speaker 1>against North Dakota State, and then there's YouTube games. Yeah,

0:23:55.880 --> 0:23:58.040
<v Speaker 1>so can mind that, and then you know the NFL

0:23:58.080 --> 0:24:02.120
<v Speaker 1>teams have everything you know, right, So for me, Jeremy Chindlon,

0:24:02.240 --> 0:24:06.000
<v Speaker 1>this workout and makes me feel much better about this

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:08.480
<v Speaker 1>guy's gonna go top one hundred. Okay, that makes sense, Okay,

0:24:08.480 --> 0:24:10.280
<v Speaker 1>I get it. I feel like much better about that.

0:24:10.760 --> 0:24:13.000
<v Speaker 1>But it's just hard to know. He had good one

0:24:13.000 --> 0:24:15.680
<v Speaker 1>thing to say about him at two twenty one, which

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:17.440
<v Speaker 1>he'd added a little bit of weight, and I had

0:24:17.720 --> 0:24:20.560
<v Speaker 1>just two h five or two o eight right around there,

0:24:20.840 --> 0:24:22.760
<v Speaker 1>So you add a little bit of weight. But he

0:24:22.840 --> 0:24:26.080
<v Speaker 1>does appear to be fast enough to have a little range,

0:24:26.119 --> 0:24:28.720
<v Speaker 1>and the few games that we have he's got thirteen

0:24:28.760 --> 0:24:32.640
<v Speaker 1>interceptions in his college career. He had four interceptions last year.

0:24:32.920 --> 0:24:34.920
<v Speaker 1>He's shown the ability to go make plays on the Bowl.

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:38.400
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting he'd kind of be a free, strong hybrid.

0:24:38.440 --> 0:24:40.280
<v Speaker 1>You normally, if I see a six three, two hundred

0:24:40.280 --> 0:24:41.760
<v Speaker 1>and twenty pound guy, I go, oh, he's just a

0:24:41.800 --> 0:24:44.560
<v Speaker 1>strong safety, but I think he might move well enough

0:24:44.600 --> 0:24:47.320
<v Speaker 1>to play play well. And we saw the Senior Bowl

0:24:47.320 --> 0:24:49.400
<v Speaker 1>he was covering pretty well. No, that's that's my thing

0:24:49.520 --> 0:24:52.480
<v Speaker 1>is you know, you watch him at Southern Illinois and

0:24:52.480 --> 0:24:54.080
<v Speaker 1>you're like, okay, cool, these guys are going to be

0:24:54.119 --> 0:24:57.520
<v Speaker 1>accountants in two years, Like how impressed am I supposed

0:24:57.560 --> 0:25:00.240
<v Speaker 1>to be? But then he plays you practice well, and

0:25:00.280 --> 0:25:01.920
<v Speaker 1>that's always going to catch your eye at the Senior

0:25:01.920 --> 0:25:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Bowl because you're going I mean, you're going against big

0:25:04.040 --> 0:25:07.320
<v Speaker 1>ten sec competition. But then to put those numbers on

0:25:07.320 --> 0:25:10.240
<v Speaker 1>the tape and say, Okay, this isn't just a byproduct

0:25:10.280 --> 0:25:13.600
<v Speaker 1>of him playing inferior competition, like he really does possess

0:25:13.680 --> 0:25:17.840
<v Speaker 1>this athleticism. I'm still terrified by the thought of drafting

0:25:17.920 --> 0:25:20.879
<v Speaker 1>him because I just have inherent biases toward big school guys,

0:25:21.119 --> 0:25:24.000
<v Speaker 1>and so does Will McClay. It seem exactly and that's yeah,

0:25:24.040 --> 0:25:27.879
<v Speaker 1>But you put numbers like that, somebody, somebody's gonna be

0:25:27.880 --> 0:25:29.360
<v Speaker 1>willing to take a chance on you. And that's why

0:25:29.359 --> 0:25:31.080
<v Speaker 1>I think his stock is up well. And I kind

0:25:31.080 --> 0:25:32.879
<v Speaker 1>of want to challenge you on your other stock up

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:39.840
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. Why guy is his stock up for

0:25:40.160 --> 0:25:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Devin Hamilton out of an Ohio state. He had the

0:25:42.520 --> 0:25:45.520
<v Speaker 1>sixth lowest forty oh he had a sub thirty vertical,

0:25:45.960 --> 0:25:49.320
<v Speaker 1>third worst broad jump out of his position. I think

0:25:50.640 --> 0:25:53.240
<v Speaker 1>as well, it depends on your definition of what stock

0:25:53.320 --> 0:25:55.760
<v Speaker 1>up means, okay, and I mean, how could those numbers

0:25:55.840 --> 0:25:59.199
<v Speaker 1>raise a stock I just want to hear what you

0:25:59.240 --> 0:26:02.560
<v Speaker 1>have to say in because like me personally, I'm looking

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:06.199
<v Speaker 1>for defensive tackles that I can draft. And you know,

0:26:06.280 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 1>we talk about Derek Brown, Javon ken Law. Uh, if

0:26:09.960 --> 0:26:14.200
<v Speaker 1>they're not there, that like I'm automatically hun I'm automatically

0:26:14.240 --> 0:26:17.159
<v Speaker 1>hunting for somebody that can find so for him, you know,

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:20.200
<v Speaker 1>then you're talking about you know, you're talking about him,

0:26:20.400 --> 0:26:23.679
<v Speaker 1>h Ross Blacklock, even like even Blacklock like he performed

0:26:23.680 --> 0:26:26.240
<v Speaker 1>well enough, like he had a better combine. At least

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:29.160
<v Speaker 1>Blacklock is the classic case of a guy that's seventeen

0:26:29.280 --> 0:26:34.000
<v Speaker 1>is probably too high, but fifty one he'll be gone. Yeah, um,

0:26:34.080 --> 0:26:39.199
<v Speaker 1>who's the other guy? Which, yeah, I wanted to avoid

0:26:39.280 --> 0:26:41.760
<v Speaker 1>Mattabek because I know, like he's a guy that we

0:26:41.800 --> 0:26:44.479
<v Speaker 1>talk about a lot. I look at him and I like,

0:26:44.960 --> 0:26:46.560
<v Speaker 1>on top of what I've seen from his tape, which

0:26:46.600 --> 0:26:49.919
<v Speaker 1>I think is surprisingly it's yeah, yeah, strength, all that

0:26:49.960 --> 0:26:52.520
<v Speaker 1>good type of stuff, and probably more of a one

0:26:52.600 --> 0:26:57.080
<v Speaker 1>technique than a pass rusher. Probably I feel I feel

0:26:57.160 --> 0:27:03.640
<v Speaker 1>better drafting him. I don't know. I think at two eighty,

0:27:03.640 --> 0:27:05.280
<v Speaker 1>I think he could sneak him in the top one hundred.

0:27:05.320 --> 0:27:07.159
<v Speaker 1>That's what I'm saying. Got and so I like, I

0:27:07.160 --> 0:27:09.520
<v Speaker 1>think it depends on what your definition of stock up is.

0:27:09.560 --> 0:27:13.119
<v Speaker 1>I don't think this guy vaulted himself into the top fifty,

0:27:13.320 --> 0:27:16.800
<v Speaker 1>but I'm hunting for down the line prospects at defensive tackle.

0:27:16.840 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, okay, like this guy. Yeah, his numbers aren't

0:27:19.320 --> 0:27:21.080
<v Speaker 1>super impressive, but it lines up with what I'd be

0:27:21.119 --> 0:27:22.840
<v Speaker 1>willing to do based on what I see on tape. Well,

0:27:22.840 --> 0:27:25.040
<v Speaker 1>when I was intrigued by you choosing him as a

0:27:25.040 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 1>stock up, because if after the Senior Bowl I would

0:27:27.800 --> 0:27:29.199
<v Speaker 1>have had him as a stock up. I thought he

0:27:29.280 --> 0:27:31.359
<v Speaker 1>looked good at Senior Bowl down in Mobile, but I

0:27:31.400 --> 0:27:33.600
<v Speaker 1>thought that the combine maybe took a little bit of

0:27:33.640 --> 0:27:35.840
<v Speaker 1>a step back in my book, at least by some

0:27:35.880 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 1>of the measurables. Now that I don't think looks okay.

0:27:39.000 --> 0:27:42.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't think so, just because nobody's pegging him as this,

0:27:42.359 --> 0:27:45.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, top fifty pig. He's to me, he I

0:27:45.320 --> 0:27:49.120
<v Speaker 1>feel like he's probably late third round, early fourth round

0:27:49.240 --> 0:27:51.560
<v Speaker 1>is probably his range borderline day. So are you going

0:27:51.600 --> 0:27:54.359
<v Speaker 1>to reach at eighty two? What do you need you know?

0:27:54.960 --> 0:27:57.360
<v Speaker 1>Or do you get ken Law round at seventeen to do?

0:27:57.359 --> 0:28:01.159
<v Speaker 1>Not to worry about there at seventeen. Man, we just

0:28:01.200 --> 0:28:02.720
<v Speaker 1>said that he wasn't going to be there. I don't

0:28:02.720 --> 0:28:04.840
<v Speaker 1>think he will be. Stop acting like it's impossible. I

0:28:04.840 --> 0:28:07.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't say it was impossible. Okay, really quickly, I'll give

0:28:07.240 --> 0:28:10.640
<v Speaker 1>you my two stock ups. It's one of the guys

0:28:10.680 --> 0:28:13.320
<v Speaker 1>that we've actually talked about quite a bit, Devin DuVernay

0:28:13.400 --> 0:28:16.400
<v Speaker 1>out of Texas fifth best forty of all wide receivers

0:28:16.400 --> 0:28:18.359
<v Speaker 1>with a four three nine. And then I threw Jacob

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:21.760
<v Speaker 1>Easton up there, and it wasn't because of his measurables.

0:28:21.760 --> 0:28:24.119
<v Speaker 1>You're gonna challenge me here today, I'm not gonna challenge you.

0:28:24.359 --> 0:28:27.119
<v Speaker 1>Just go ahead and come back. I'll just disagree with you.

0:28:27.160 --> 0:28:29.119
<v Speaker 1>Get him back. I thought he threw the ball better

0:28:29.160 --> 0:28:32.200
<v Speaker 1>than almost any other quarterback there, maybe with the exception

0:28:32.240 --> 0:28:36.320
<v Speaker 1>of Justin Herbert. Oh, I thought you disagree, I do disagree, Okay,

0:28:36.400 --> 0:28:38.960
<v Speaker 1>I thought he's got a big arm. For sure, he

0:28:39.000 --> 0:28:40.720
<v Speaker 1>has a huge arm. He's easy for him to throw it.

0:28:40.800 --> 0:28:44.000
<v Speaker 1>Absolute Lynch type tends. Now. Yeah. One thing that did

0:28:44.000 --> 0:28:46.200
<v Speaker 1>read this morning on Jacob Easton that put a little

0:28:46.200 --> 0:28:49.600
<v Speaker 1>asterist on this. Apparently Tom McShay talked about how he

0:28:49.680 --> 0:28:52.840
<v Speaker 1>did not impress teams in his interviews, and apparently in

0:28:52.880 --> 0:28:54.680
<v Speaker 1>the quote from the story that I read, said that

0:28:54.760 --> 0:28:58.320
<v Speaker 1>he quote unquote owned the room and saw that he

0:28:58.400 --> 0:29:00.400
<v Speaker 1>was bigger than what was going on. And I didn't

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:03.200
<v Speaker 1>like that a whole lot from a quarterback. So yeah,

0:29:03.240 --> 0:29:06.680
<v Speaker 1>I feel like with that, I didn't hear enough details

0:29:06.680 --> 0:29:08.600
<v Speaker 1>of what McShay was saying. So to me, it just

0:29:08.640 --> 0:29:11.880
<v Speaker 1>made me really really angry at media where it's like, well,

0:29:11.920 --> 0:29:13.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, I heard from an anonymous guy that he

0:29:14.080 --> 0:29:17.240
<v Speaker 1>didn't no no, no, no, no no no no. If we're

0:29:17.280 --> 0:29:20.560
<v Speaker 1>sabotaging character pre draft, tell me who said it and

0:29:20.560 --> 0:29:25.240
<v Speaker 1>what they're talking about. That's at Haskins right now. He's

0:29:25.280 --> 0:29:28.600
<v Speaker 1>not a prospect anymore, but it's still annoying. Yeah. I

0:29:28.640 --> 0:29:30.800
<v Speaker 1>thought he threw the ball well a little bit high there.

0:29:30.880 --> 0:29:34.560
<v Speaker 1>I just think that right, well, he's just the combine

0:29:34.640 --> 0:29:37.000
<v Speaker 1>is meant for guys like him. That's all. He's to

0:29:37.080 --> 0:29:39.880
<v Speaker 1>show off the arm. She is velost. He's probably the

0:29:39.920 --> 0:29:44.000
<v Speaker 1>most naturally gifted quarterback in the class. All right, we

0:29:44.080 --> 0:29:46.680
<v Speaker 1>are Okay, he's got a cannon, didn't wring it? Yeah,

0:29:46.720 --> 0:29:50.120
<v Speaker 1>and he's he's inconsistent his decision making. I don't love

0:29:51.280 --> 0:29:54.200
<v Speaker 1>I'll borrow this line from The Solid Verbal, my favorite

0:29:54.240 --> 0:29:57.800
<v Speaker 1>college football podcast. They call him purple Cutler, and I'm like,

0:29:57.960 --> 0:30:00.000
<v Speaker 1>mind's trust the tape. I'm gonna trust the tape guy.

0:30:00.000 --> 0:30:02.240
<v Speaker 1>There you go. Yeah, that's a good one too. Um.

0:30:02.280 --> 0:30:05.160
<v Speaker 1>I just I this this whole Cutler. That's a good one.

0:30:05.200 --> 0:30:08.120
<v Speaker 1>When people when people talk about the underwear Olympics, that's

0:30:08.120 --> 0:30:11.719
<v Speaker 1>what they're talking about. And like if if, if his

0:30:11.840 --> 0:30:14.400
<v Speaker 1>natural ability wants prompts you to draft him in the

0:30:14.440 --> 0:30:16.560
<v Speaker 1>top thirty five, good luck. I just don't see it,

0:30:17.200 --> 0:30:18.719
<v Speaker 1>all right, but I do think it could. I mean,

0:30:18.720 --> 0:30:20.200
<v Speaker 1>it could help his stock because he can go out

0:30:20.240 --> 0:30:21.760
<v Speaker 1>there and show off that he's got to contend on

0:30:21.880 --> 0:30:24.800
<v Speaker 1>and yeah, football on the back foot. I do agree

0:30:24.800 --> 0:30:27.240
<v Speaker 1>with I agree with Devin DuVernay just because in the

0:30:27.280 --> 0:30:31.160
<v Speaker 1>sense that that is a position where the forty yard

0:30:31.200 --> 0:30:36.200
<v Speaker 1>dash really does matter, Like receiver and cornerback, crowded receiver class.

0:30:36.280 --> 0:30:39.200
<v Speaker 1>Anything you can do to distinguish yourself matters. And if

0:30:39.240 --> 0:30:42.800
<v Speaker 1>he can run a sub for forty and somebody's going

0:30:42.840 --> 0:30:44.600
<v Speaker 1>to be intrigued by that speed. We were talking with

0:30:44.680 --> 0:30:47.640
<v Speaker 1>Kat last week and or the week before Indians saying

0:30:47.640 --> 0:30:49.920
<v Speaker 1>that if Devin DuVernay comes out and runs a four four,

0:30:49.920 --> 0:30:51.560
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna be thinking of him a little bit differently

0:30:51.600 --> 0:30:54.520
<v Speaker 1>as well. Yeah, absolutely, because the production was nuts last year.

0:30:54.560 --> 0:30:56.640
<v Speaker 1>And yeah, my biggest issues with him is just how

0:30:56.640 --> 0:30:59.320
<v Speaker 1>big canny play. Yeah he's got short arms, things like that,

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:01.080
<v Speaker 1>but he does catch everything. He finds a way to

0:31:01.080 --> 0:31:03.400
<v Speaker 1>get open. There's a lot to like about him. That's

0:31:03.400 --> 0:31:06.080
<v Speaker 1>just how how much you're reaching for guys like that

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:09.480
<v Speaker 1>in this wide receiver loaded class. You need him, I

0:31:09.520 --> 0:31:11.400
<v Speaker 1>don't know, do you need him to play big if

0:31:11.440 --> 0:31:16.360
<v Speaker 1>he's always in the slot, doesn't drop anything, which, ironically

0:31:17.080 --> 0:31:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Dane Dane pointed this out last week, like he wasn't

0:31:19.560 --> 0:31:22.240
<v Speaker 1>amazing in the past catching drills at the combine, but

0:31:22.280 --> 0:31:25.800
<v Speaker 1>I will gladly take thirteen games worth of tape over

0:31:26.360 --> 0:31:29.760
<v Speaker 1>one he dropped a pass though? Did he done in

0:31:29.760 --> 0:31:33.520
<v Speaker 1>the catching drills? I guess what Dane's quote was. He

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:36.160
<v Speaker 1>was fighting the ball. Okay, he just he didn't look natural,

0:31:36.240 --> 0:31:38.280
<v Speaker 1>look and look smooth. But again he thought his way

0:31:38.320 --> 0:31:41.400
<v Speaker 1>to zero drops. Give me, give me thirteen games of

0:31:41.440 --> 0:31:43.520
<v Speaker 1>tape of him looking pretty good doing it over. Whatever

0:31:43.560 --> 0:31:45.239
<v Speaker 1>you think about the combine, I think he only had

0:31:45.240 --> 0:31:48.880
<v Speaker 1>the one drop during his entire career. Torch Daves Tigers, Yeah,

0:31:48.880 --> 0:31:52.040
<v Speaker 1>he did pretty good. Question the question there's who are

0:31:52.040 --> 0:31:56.520
<v Speaker 1>the other wide receivers about considering taking becomes That's that's

0:31:56.520 --> 0:32:00.680
<v Speaker 1>where Crochet well, actually that it's gonna be a question

0:32:00.680 --> 0:32:03.520
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna address Twitter on the twenty coming up here

0:32:03.520 --> 0:32:05.560
<v Speaker 1>in just a minute. Now. It's okay, I like to tease.

0:32:05.920 --> 0:32:07.600
<v Speaker 1>It's a good way. We did some stock ups. We

0:32:07.640 --> 0:32:09.400
<v Speaker 1>didn't get to all of our stockdowns. We'll have to

0:32:09.440 --> 0:32:12.160
<v Speaker 1>do that some other time coming up in the next

0:32:12.160 --> 0:32:14.640
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks. But when we come back, we'll go

0:32:14.680 --> 0:32:17.400
<v Speaker 1>to Twitter on the twenty. We'll address that wide receiver question.

0:32:17.960 --> 0:32:20.560
<v Speaker 1>Depending on how deep this class is, what do we

0:32:20.640 --> 0:32:23.920
<v Speaker 1>think about taking a wide receiver at seventeen? Those questions

0:32:23.920 --> 0:32:25.880
<v Speaker 1>and more when we return here on the Dallas Cowboys

0:32:25.920 --> 0:32:30.400
<v Speaker 1>dot Com Draft Show, I'm Jay Novachik, former tight end

0:32:30.440 --> 0:32:33.080
<v Speaker 1>for the Dallas Cowboys. Back in the day, I was

0:32:33.080 --> 0:32:35.440
<v Speaker 1>the guy who always got the tough yards and that's

0:32:35.480 --> 0:32:38.320
<v Speaker 1>why I run with John Deer today. In fact, I

0:32:38.400 --> 0:32:41.000
<v Speaker 1>have a John Dear three zero twenty five E tractor

0:32:41.160 --> 0:32:43.320
<v Speaker 1>that can handle any yard work I need to do,

0:32:43.560 --> 0:32:46.160
<v Speaker 1>even the tough yards way out back. So if you

0:32:46.240 --> 0:32:48.880
<v Speaker 1>have one acre or a thousand, John Deer has the

0:32:48.920 --> 0:32:51.720
<v Speaker 1>equipment that's just right for you. Visit a John Dear

0:32:51.840 --> 0:32:54.800
<v Speaker 1>dealer today and run with us. We are the official

0:32:54.880 --> 0:32:58.880
<v Speaker 1>tractor provider of your Dallas COWBOYSLAURA is a proud sponsor

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:02.120
<v Speaker 1>of the Dallas cow Boys, helping fans seemore and do

0:33:02.320 --> 0:33:05.880
<v Speaker 1>more with our best vision solutions. Our lens technologies reveal

0:33:05.920 --> 0:33:08.480
<v Speaker 1>a world more beautiful than you can imagine. For a

0:33:08.520 --> 0:33:11.280
<v Speaker 1>limited time, get the slur next Gen offer for you

0:33:11.400 --> 0:33:15.080
<v Speaker 1>by the latest generation of Transitions lenses with select Eslore lenses,

0:33:15.160 --> 0:33:17.280
<v Speaker 1>you can choose a second pair of clear lenses for

0:33:17.360 --> 0:33:21.400
<v Speaker 1>free with qualifying frame purchases. Restrictions apply. Find a participating

0:33:21.400 --> 0:33:27.200
<v Speaker 1>eyecare professional by visiting slur usa dot com. Seemore do more?

0:33:27.520 --> 0:33:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Want to use what the pros use? How about the

0:33:29.720 --> 0:33:33.600
<v Speaker 1>official men's skincare brand of the Dallas Cowboys, Jack Black.

0:33:33.880 --> 0:33:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Right now you can get the Jack Black Starter, a

0:33:36.120 --> 0:33:39.080
<v Speaker 1>curated collection of Cowboys locker room favorites, for just ten

0:33:39.120 --> 0:33:42.400
<v Speaker 1>bucks with free shipping. The Starter includes four Jack Clack

0:33:42.480 --> 0:33:46.160
<v Speaker 1>skincare favorites plus a full sized and tense therapy lip bomb.

0:33:46.280 --> 0:33:48.920
<v Speaker 1>Go to get Jack Black dot com slash Cowboys and

0:33:49.000 --> 0:33:52.120
<v Speaker 1>use the code word team JB. That's get Jack Black

0:33:52.200 --> 0:33:56.120
<v Speaker 1>dot com slash Cowboys the Jack Black Starter, ten bucks,

0:33:56.120 --> 0:33:59.520
<v Speaker 1>free shipping your new apartments big. Such a great deal.

0:34:00.480 --> 0:34:08.680
<v Speaker 1>That's okay, just okay. What's not right about the subway? Well,

0:34:08.840 --> 0:34:12.760
<v Speaker 1>I bet you don't even notice it after that's my neighbor.

0:34:13.480 --> 0:34:17.160
<v Speaker 1>Ange the deal. That's just okay, It's not okay. Get

0:34:17.200 --> 0:34:19.759
<v Speaker 1>a great deal with America's best network. Come into an

0:34:19.760 --> 0:34:21.239
<v Speaker 1>AT and T store to find out how to get

0:34:21.320 --> 0:34:24.160
<v Speaker 1>one of our popular smartphones for zero dollars down based

0:34:24.160 --> 0:34:31.840
<v Speaker 1>on GWS one course. September twenty nineteen. This is the

0:34:32.000 --> 0:34:37.759
<v Speaker 1>Dallas Cowboys dot com Draft Show. Thank you from the

0:34:38.040 --> 0:34:41.800
<v Speaker 1>s WBC Mortgage Studios. Jeff kalvan On, Kevin Turner, David

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:43.680
<v Speaker 1>Helm and Kyle Yeoman's with you here on the Dallas

0:34:43.719 --> 0:34:47.959
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys dot Com Draft Show, as always presented by Miller Lite.

0:34:48.040 --> 0:34:51.239
<v Speaker 1>Time now for some Twitter on the twenty Twitter on

0:34:51.360 --> 0:34:54.839
<v Speaker 1>the Twitter where, of course we go through your fan

0:34:55.000 --> 0:34:58.680
<v Speaker 1>questions via Twitter and answer them the best we can

0:34:59.000 --> 0:35:03.879
<v Speaker 1>here from inside the s TOWBC Mortgage Studios. We've got

0:35:03.920 --> 0:35:06.759
<v Speaker 1>some good questions over the course of the day, and

0:35:07.640 --> 0:35:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Katie and Dave also tweeted it out. Dallas. Smith starts

0:35:11.239 --> 0:35:13.960
<v Speaker 1>us off and he goes, would you rather have Cooper

0:35:14.440 --> 0:35:16.919
<v Speaker 1>and a top corner in the draft or a top

0:35:16.920 --> 0:35:19.959
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver in the draft? And Byron Jones? And why

0:35:20.320 --> 0:35:24.800
<v Speaker 1>the debate that is crippling Cowboys Twitter as we speak.

0:35:26.040 --> 0:35:29.040
<v Speaker 1>I would go Jones, this is a receiver, so we're

0:35:29.080 --> 0:35:32.239
<v Speaker 1>getting we're getting either Cooper or Jones on like a

0:35:32.239 --> 0:35:35.600
<v Speaker 1>five year deal, not a franchise tax correct. Okay, Okay,

0:35:35.800 --> 0:35:40.840
<v Speaker 1>here's my problem with the question, Dallas, what is a

0:35:41.120 --> 0:35:43.480
<v Speaker 1>top corner in the draft? Because to me, it's Okuda

0:35:43.600 --> 0:35:46.360
<v Speaker 1>and then and then there's a Jars wide receiver. I

0:35:46.360 --> 0:35:48.680
<v Speaker 1>can give you three names. Yeah, so if I can

0:35:48.719 --> 0:35:50.800
<v Speaker 1>have one of those three names, I can't have Occuda.

0:35:51.040 --> 0:35:53.160
<v Speaker 1>So if you'll give me Ceedee Lamb, Jerry Judy, or

0:35:53.239 --> 0:35:57.400
<v Speaker 1>Henry Ruggs and Byron Jones. I'll take that over Amari

0:35:57.440 --> 0:36:00.719
<v Speaker 1>Cooper and whoever your second corner is. So I would

0:36:00.760 --> 0:36:04.120
<v Speaker 1>go Byron Jones and receiver. But you saying that right now,

0:36:04.160 --> 0:36:08.440
<v Speaker 1>it's likely that the second one is more likely having

0:36:08.560 --> 0:36:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Amari Cooper back and then maybe drafting a guy like

0:36:10.920 --> 0:36:13.120
<v Speaker 1>a C. J. Henderson as a corner. Yes, the Cowboys

0:36:13.120 --> 0:36:17.080
<v Speaker 1>are doing this wrong. Correct you're saying, oh yeah, yeah,

0:36:17.120 --> 0:36:20.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying I would prioritize Byron over a Mari Wow.

0:36:20.080 --> 0:36:23.040
<v Speaker 1>And I think Amari as a player has more to

0:36:23.080 --> 0:36:25.160
<v Speaker 1>do with wins and losses than Byron does when he's

0:36:25.200 --> 0:36:27.600
<v Speaker 1>healthy and ready to rock. But I also have questions,

0:36:27.640 --> 0:36:30.439
<v Speaker 1>just like Oakland head questions. I don't have questions about

0:36:30.440 --> 0:36:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Byron Jones. I know he's gonna be out there every

0:36:32.440 --> 0:36:34.520
<v Speaker 1>week and he's gonna play really well. And I can

0:36:34.560 --> 0:36:40.200
<v Speaker 1>find a receiver, which is really Huevos to assume when

0:36:40.200 --> 0:36:42.359
<v Speaker 1>this team was lost before Cooper got here. That's the

0:36:42.360 --> 0:36:44.760
<v Speaker 1>thing that and that, like, I don't disagree with anything

0:36:44.800 --> 0:36:49.120
<v Speaker 1>you just said, but I can't let go. I can't

0:36:49.200 --> 0:36:50.880
<v Speaker 1>let go of the fact that I think that Amari

0:36:51.080 --> 0:36:53.400
<v Speaker 1>does have more and more of an impact on wins

0:36:53.400 --> 0:36:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and losses, like if I promised you Jerry Judy or

0:36:56.040 --> 0:37:00.319
<v Speaker 1>Ceedee Lamb even still and like you and me, like

0:37:00.400 --> 0:37:02.560
<v Speaker 1>we're of one mind on this that we love this

0:37:02.600 --> 0:37:05.560
<v Speaker 1>receiver class. We love the idea of drafting one forty burgers.

0:37:05.680 --> 0:37:09.640
<v Speaker 1>I don't like the idea of asking anybody to fill

0:37:09.680 --> 0:37:12.960
<v Speaker 1>in for Marii Cooper and like have to really carry

0:37:13.000 --> 0:37:15.920
<v Speaker 1>that load right away, because as many good receivers have

0:37:15.960 --> 0:37:18.719
<v Speaker 1>coming into the league recently, not very many of them

0:37:18.840 --> 0:37:21.520
<v Speaker 1>hit the ground running. Like that's not a long list

0:37:21.640 --> 0:37:24.359
<v Speaker 1>you think about, you know, recent drafts where you know,

0:37:24.480 --> 0:37:26.160
<v Speaker 1>would you be happy if you took a receiver in

0:37:26.200 --> 0:37:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the first round and he had a Terry McLaurin rookie year?

0:37:29.360 --> 0:37:34.120
<v Speaker 1>Hell yeah? And I think Lamb, I think you could

0:37:34.120 --> 0:37:40.320
<v Speaker 1>do a j Brown over a thousand Deebo Samuel guys,

0:37:40.400 --> 0:37:44.200
<v Speaker 1>it's doable. Debo Debo is not fair because Debo really

0:37:44.200 --> 0:37:46.840
<v Speaker 1>didn't catch. Like that's what I'm saying. Deebo wasn't really

0:37:47.360 --> 0:37:49.600
<v Speaker 1>a guy until like October, and none of these guys

0:37:49.600 --> 0:37:51.399
<v Speaker 1>were that we're talking about. I think you could say

0:37:51.400 --> 0:37:55.279
<v Speaker 1>this Debo, these guys weren't one of the first two

0:37:55.280 --> 0:38:00.200
<v Speaker 1>wide receivers. None of those guys has changed. Zeek some

0:38:00.280 --> 0:38:03.640
<v Speaker 1>open Well, okay, it's it's scares doing that. It scares me,

0:38:03.760 --> 0:38:06.360
<v Speaker 1>is all I'm saying. I think I think they're they're

0:38:06.760 --> 0:38:10.440
<v Speaker 1>terribly uh maybe crippled isn't the word, but maybe a

0:38:10.480 --> 0:38:14.279
<v Speaker 1>little paralyzed by twenty eighteen in their decision to go

0:38:14.320 --> 0:38:16.800
<v Speaker 1>into that season with no true number one wide receiver.

0:38:17.080 --> 0:38:18.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think they don't want to do that again,

0:38:19.160 --> 0:38:21.760
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's going to affect them, not ringing

0:38:21.800 --> 0:38:25.520
<v Speaker 1>Byron Jones back. Now, here's what I do, which is crazy,

0:38:25.520 --> 0:38:28.960
<v Speaker 1>but I sign it also, well, I sign everybody, and

0:38:28.960 --> 0:38:31.560
<v Speaker 1>if I need to do some restructuring of contracts and

0:38:31.840 --> 0:38:34.319
<v Speaker 1>behind it, I'll do that. Anyway, can we talk about

0:38:34.360 --> 0:38:36.920
<v Speaker 1>sign signing every We now know We now know that

0:38:36.960 --> 0:38:40.000
<v Speaker 1>the players will begin voting on the CBA and it's

0:38:40.239 --> 0:38:42.600
<v Speaker 1>they have until a week from today to read four

0:38:42.680 --> 0:38:45.439
<v Speaker 1>hundred and fifty six pages. I mean, that's doable if

0:38:45.480 --> 0:38:47.560
<v Speaker 1>you sit down and concentrate. I'd read the whole thing.

0:38:48.520 --> 0:38:51.160
<v Speaker 1>But if they approve it, like everything we're hearing is

0:38:51.200 --> 0:38:55.399
<v Speaker 1>that the CBA is going to absolutely skyrocket the salary cap.

0:38:56.600 --> 0:38:59.000
<v Speaker 1>So why are they afraid of doing all the deals

0:39:00.080 --> 0:39:03.000
<v Speaker 1>what And the only answer to that is that they

0:39:03.560 --> 0:39:05.640
<v Speaker 1>don't believe in Byron Jones the way that a lot

0:39:05.680 --> 0:39:09.359
<v Speaker 1>of fans and media do well. Mike Nolan's comments his

0:39:09.440 --> 0:39:13.120
<v Speaker 1>first media availability, you know, basically kind of saying, and

0:39:13.160 --> 0:39:16.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not worried about the guy that can't catch the ball. Basically,

0:39:16.840 --> 0:39:18.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm not worried about the guy that bats the ball down.

0:39:18.560 --> 0:39:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I'm worried about the guy that takes him back for

0:39:20.080 --> 0:39:24.560
<v Speaker 1>something paraphrasing said Byron Jones doesn't get turnovers, right, paraphrasing

0:39:24.640 --> 0:39:29.200
<v Speaker 1>All right, all of Cowboys Nation so stupid. No offense,

0:39:30.680 --> 0:39:34.319
<v Speaker 1>no offense, the offense. So if he got three interceptions

0:39:34.320 --> 0:39:37.080
<v Speaker 1>a year, then he would be, you know, a pretty

0:39:37.080 --> 0:39:39.600
<v Speaker 1>good corner or great corner who now has three interceptions

0:39:39.600 --> 0:39:42.360
<v Speaker 1>a year. Now he's gonna face like six hundred past

0:39:42.440 --> 0:39:45.040
<v Speaker 1>snaps a year. So we're worried about what happens on

0:39:45.200 --> 0:39:48.920
<v Speaker 1>point five percent of the plays at corner and not

0:39:49.040 --> 0:39:51.399
<v Speaker 1>as worried about the ninety nine point five where he's

0:39:51.400 --> 0:39:53.400
<v Speaker 1>one of the five to ten best corners in the league.

0:39:53.600 --> 0:39:56.640
<v Speaker 1>But he didn't have an outcome on point five percent

0:39:56.680 --> 0:39:58.879
<v Speaker 1>of snaps that I would have liked that is that

0:39:59.040 --> 0:40:01.879
<v Speaker 1>is what is being suggested. Yes, awesome. Well, you also

0:40:01.880 --> 0:40:05.560
<v Speaker 1>think about the fact of the Katie brought up the

0:40:05.560 --> 0:40:08.200
<v Speaker 1>point of maybe being scared about not having the number

0:40:08.200 --> 0:40:11.200
<v Speaker 1>one wide receiver. But the way that they got rid

0:40:11.200 --> 0:40:13.759
<v Speaker 1>of that problem is they invested their twenty nineteen first

0:40:13.800 --> 0:40:16.080
<v Speaker 1>round pick. If you let him are Cooper walk and

0:40:16.120 --> 0:40:18.480
<v Speaker 1>you draft a guy at seventeen, that's two straight years

0:40:18.480 --> 0:40:21.160
<v Speaker 1>you're investing that first round pick in a wide receiver. Yeah,

0:40:21.160 --> 0:40:23.520
<v Speaker 1>in an a position you can't. You can't make those

0:40:23.520 --> 0:40:26.080
<v Speaker 1>decisions based on what's already been sunk, right Like it

0:40:26.120 --> 0:40:28.840
<v Speaker 1>would it would suck to let him Ari go. You know,

0:40:28.880 --> 0:40:30.880
<v Speaker 1>you trade. You know, you want five years of production

0:40:30.920 --> 0:40:32.960
<v Speaker 1>out of your first round pick. But like, if you're

0:40:32.960 --> 0:40:36.720
<v Speaker 1>not convinced he's the guy, don't sign him just because pride.

0:40:36.800 --> 0:40:39.520
<v Speaker 1>But that's that's kind of what I'm saying, is prideful

0:40:39.920 --> 0:40:43.280
<v Speaker 1>wise This could be something that the Cowboys are looking

0:40:43.320 --> 0:40:45.719
<v Speaker 1>at in terms of their decision making moving forward. I

0:40:45.719 --> 0:40:47.880
<v Speaker 1>really I'm not saying that's right now, saying that might

0:40:47.960 --> 0:40:50.120
<v Speaker 1>be what's going through their head. I think it's as

0:40:50.120 --> 0:40:53.200
<v Speaker 1>simple as like, which guy gives you the better chance?

0:40:53.239 --> 0:40:56.359
<v Speaker 1>Of impacting a game all on his own, because as

0:40:56.520 --> 0:40:59.520
<v Speaker 1>for all of Amri's duds, we've also seen him turn

0:41:00.040 --> 0:41:02.800
<v Speaker 1>five or six games completely on their ear. The Minnesota

0:41:02.800 --> 0:41:04.880
<v Speaker 1>game stuck out to me this year, and the Philly

0:41:04.920 --> 0:41:07.479
<v Speaker 1>game the year he got here, and I'm honestly yeah,

0:41:07.560 --> 0:41:10.480
<v Speaker 1>and he's got a track record of being able to

0:41:10.480 --> 0:41:12.520
<v Speaker 1>do that. I know he disappears on the road at times.

0:41:12.520 --> 0:41:15.480
<v Speaker 1>I know he's had some iffy moments. He still has

0:41:15.480 --> 0:41:17.799
<v Speaker 1>a much higher chance of doing that than Byron, and

0:41:17.840 --> 0:41:20.799
<v Speaker 1>I think that's what's driving that decision making. Well. It's interesting, though,

0:41:20.840 --> 0:41:24.120
<v Speaker 1>if we're stacking a big board together, you have Rugs,

0:41:24.160 --> 0:41:27.800
<v Speaker 1>you have Jerry Judy, you have Ceedee Lamb, all stacked

0:41:27.880 --> 0:41:31.880
<v Speaker 1>higher than c. J. Henderson or Fulton or Trevon Diggs

0:41:32.160 --> 0:41:35.960
<v Speaker 1>or I still have Jeff Gladen TCU as the second

0:41:36.000 --> 0:41:38.879
<v Speaker 1>cornerback for me. But like you have all those wide

0:41:38.880 --> 0:41:41.080
<v Speaker 1>receivers stacked higher than those And if we're sitting there

0:41:41.080 --> 0:41:43.839
<v Speaker 1>and taking the best player, well that's what we're doing

0:41:43.880 --> 0:41:46.279
<v Speaker 1>at seventeen right now. I'm also waiting on Kin Law.

0:41:46.360 --> 0:41:49.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm hoping Laws that's still plan A for me. But

0:41:50.200 --> 0:41:52.640
<v Speaker 1>let me ask you this Jeffrey, which this is my

0:41:52.920 --> 0:41:55.560
<v Speaker 1>this is my thought process that makes me feel better

0:41:55.560 --> 0:41:58.759
<v Speaker 1>about this whole thing. And I don't know that they

0:41:58.800 --> 0:42:02.520
<v Speaker 1>will because they haven't. But if the Cowboys take the

0:42:02.640 --> 0:42:04.880
<v Speaker 1>savings on the money, they would have spent on Byron

0:42:05.480 --> 0:42:08.920
<v Speaker 1>and invested in a way more meaningful way than what

0:42:08.920 --> 0:42:12.120
<v Speaker 1>we're used to seeing. What's more meaningful than a great corner,

0:42:12.320 --> 0:42:18.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean three or four above average caliber free agent replacements,

0:42:19.080 --> 0:42:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Like not signing Byron enables you to bring back Robert Quinn,

0:42:23.840 --> 0:42:28.280
<v Speaker 1>maybe you could. Theoretically it's Robert Quinn deaf, Carl Joseph

0:42:28.480 --> 0:42:33.400
<v Speaker 1>took my strong safety absolutely and now add one more piece.

0:42:33.480 --> 0:42:36.279
<v Speaker 1>So say, how about I don't know again, this might

0:42:36.320 --> 0:42:39.359
<v Speaker 1>just be that Quinn ten million, Carl Joseph five or six, right,

0:42:40.120 --> 0:42:42.120
<v Speaker 1>sixteen million dollars there it spent. What if I could

0:42:42.160 --> 0:42:44.680
<v Speaker 1>get you like Mike Brocker's at D tackle or something

0:42:44.760 --> 0:42:48.000
<v Speaker 1>silly like that. Yeah, I think that maybe the free

0:42:48.000 --> 0:42:50.239
<v Speaker 1>agency D tackle class is what's kind of pushing me

0:42:50.280 --> 0:42:52.759
<v Speaker 1>away from Kin law Now and Derek Brown because I

0:42:52.800 --> 0:42:56.879
<v Speaker 1>think it's more it's the easiest one to fill. Let's go. Yeah,

0:42:56.880 --> 0:42:59.120
<v Speaker 1>I think there's twenty good options in free agency, which

0:42:59.120 --> 0:43:00.640
<v Speaker 1>means that the money is going to right up. You're

0:43:00.640 --> 0:43:03.240
<v Speaker 1>gonna have six dudes that our NFL starters, Like hey,

0:43:03.719 --> 0:43:07.279
<v Speaker 1>what did with somebody? And like, yes we will. That's

0:43:07.320 --> 0:43:09.799
<v Speaker 1>my saving grace because I'm like, all right, if you're

0:43:09.800 --> 0:43:13.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna spend that money getting a handful of guys who

0:43:13.080 --> 0:43:15.920
<v Speaker 1>could make the team better, I'll stomach it easier than

0:43:15.960 --> 0:43:18.080
<v Speaker 1>if you're just gonna let him walk and sign. No

0:43:18.120 --> 0:43:20.040
<v Speaker 1>one cares. I should have sold more jerseys Byron. I

0:43:20.040 --> 0:43:22.080
<v Speaker 1>know you're gonna quote another question. We're in too, Kyle

0:43:22.120 --> 0:43:24.640
<v Speaker 1>real quick, but say, does the new head coach matter

0:43:24.800 --> 0:43:26.239
<v Speaker 1>the fact that he's brought in a lot of people?

0:43:26.280 --> 0:43:28.960
<v Speaker 1>Does that matter? Because if you just signed a five

0:43:29.040 --> 0:43:30.799
<v Speaker 1>year contract as a new head coach of a team

0:43:30.920 --> 0:43:32.960
<v Speaker 1>and I'm looking at the depth chart overall, I'm going,

0:43:33.000 --> 0:43:34.879
<v Speaker 1>oh my god, I'm gonna have to remake this entire

0:43:35.000 --> 0:43:39.120
<v Speaker 1>secondary in two years. Yeah, A, does that make you

0:43:39.160 --> 0:43:42.279
<v Speaker 1>go we should sign Byron or you know, be as mean,

0:43:42.360 --> 0:43:45.200
<v Speaker 1>we need to start drafting dudes because Byron's not gonna

0:43:45.200 --> 0:43:47.360
<v Speaker 1>be here, and then who knows. I also am interested

0:43:47.400 --> 0:43:49.799
<v Speaker 1>in keeping Anthony Brown. I don't know if they're gonna

0:43:49.800 --> 0:43:51.359
<v Speaker 1>do that. I don't know what his gonna be like,

0:43:51.680 --> 0:43:54.120
<v Speaker 1>him being hurt, save the money. You had a chance

0:43:54.160 --> 0:43:57.359
<v Speaker 1>to keep Anthony Brown. I'm highly interested in doing that same,

0:43:58.120 --> 0:44:00.839
<v Speaker 1>but just just I don't know. That's I just can't wait.

0:44:00.960 --> 0:44:03.560
<v Speaker 1>I can't wait to see what the thirty visit list

0:44:03.600 --> 0:44:05.479
<v Speaker 1>starts to look like, because I just have a hunch

0:44:05.520 --> 0:44:07.880
<v Speaker 1>there's gonna be a lot of dbs on it. Yeah. Probably.

0:44:08.000 --> 0:44:10.360
<v Speaker 1>And with that being said, you mentioned this name a

0:44:10.360 --> 0:44:12.880
<v Speaker 1>little bit earlier, but he's a part of our next question.

0:44:12.960 --> 0:44:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Javon kin Law. Joe DeMeo asked three scenarios for the

0:44:16.960 --> 0:44:20.360
<v Speaker 1>first two rounds. Pick one. First one is Javon Kinlaw

0:44:20.440 --> 0:44:23.880
<v Speaker 1>South Carolina with Antoine Winfield, junior out of Minnesota, C J.

0:44:24.040 --> 0:44:27.480
<v Speaker 1>Henderson out of Florida, and Justin Metabek the defensive tackle

0:44:27.520 --> 0:44:30.960
<v Speaker 1>from A and M. That's scenario two. Scenario three Javan

0:44:31.120 --> 0:44:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Jason out of LSU, calevonvon excuse me, and then our

0:44:36.800 --> 0:44:40.080
<v Speaker 1>Nett out of Ohio State is third. Easy for me.

0:44:40.280 --> 0:44:42.840
<v Speaker 1>I love all the second round picks. I do too.

0:44:43.440 --> 0:44:46.120
<v Speaker 1>For me, it's number one, me too. It's good Javon Kinlaw.

0:44:46.239 --> 0:44:49.360
<v Speaker 1>It's Antoona Winfield, the safety from Minnesota. That's the to me,

0:44:49.440 --> 0:44:52.640
<v Speaker 1>that's my favorite combination by far, I think one is

0:44:52.680 --> 0:44:57.520
<v Speaker 1>my favorite combination. I'm starting to be intrigued, which is

0:44:57.560 --> 0:44:59.520
<v Speaker 1>funny because he didn't even work out at the combine,

0:44:59.600 --> 0:45:01.840
<v Speaker 1>but could sell me on Jason. Jason, I know he

0:45:01.920 --> 0:45:04.200
<v Speaker 1>scares a lot of people. You could sell me on

0:45:04.280 --> 0:45:08.319
<v Speaker 1>his raw athleticism, just because I think you talk about

0:45:08.400 --> 0:45:10.680
<v Speaker 1>not being thrilled by this edge class like, I think

0:45:10.719 --> 0:45:13.600
<v Speaker 1>he's got the ability to bend the corner and get

0:45:13.600 --> 0:45:15.399
<v Speaker 1>after it, so he's got a chance to be edged two.

0:45:15.560 --> 0:45:19.439
<v Speaker 1>I think I'm just gonna go out on a lemon.

0:45:19.520 --> 0:45:22.520
<v Speaker 1>Say when he's done working out at LSU's pro Day,

0:45:22.680 --> 0:45:25.600
<v Speaker 1>he'll he'll be a top twelve pick, probably rocketing. I

0:45:25.600 --> 0:45:27.279
<v Speaker 1>think so all right, I think that people are going

0:45:27.360 --> 0:45:29.360
<v Speaker 1>to take a chance on his athleticism more than it

0:45:29.360 --> 0:45:31.719
<v Speaker 1>would be good for the Cowboys. I usual for the Cowboys.

0:45:31.800 --> 0:45:34.719
<v Speaker 1>That's how you get can I get into one? Winfield

0:45:35.000 --> 0:45:39.399
<v Speaker 1>is better than Zevir McKinney started. Oh, I've heard that before, though,

0:45:39.440 --> 0:45:41.319
<v Speaker 1>so I don't think that's okay. Maybe I'm not starting it,

0:45:41.360 --> 0:45:44.920
<v Speaker 1>but no, dude, I think Winfield's gonna end up going

0:45:44.920 --> 0:45:47.160
<v Speaker 1>in the first round too, if the safety started going

0:45:47.200 --> 0:45:51.320
<v Speaker 1>earlier than so you're saying, you're saying, my first option,

0:45:52.160 --> 0:45:55.200
<v Speaker 1>first option of this is the more fun one for

0:45:55.239 --> 0:45:57.520
<v Speaker 1>the Cowboys. I think the first pick it's fun and

0:45:58.000 --> 0:46:00.600
<v Speaker 1>just makes a ton of sense, one hundred percent does.

0:46:00.680 --> 0:46:03.240
<v Speaker 1>And then the second one I would believe would probably

0:46:03.239 --> 0:46:05.840
<v Speaker 1>be the most likely. It was what was it Henderson

0:46:05.840 --> 0:46:09.920
<v Speaker 1>and Mattabek. Yeah, I don't. I don't know if Winfield's

0:46:09.920 --> 0:46:11.680
<v Speaker 1>going to be there at fifty one. Neither do I.

0:46:11.680 --> 0:46:13.759
<v Speaker 1>I don't think there's a chance he's there fifty one.

0:46:14.000 --> 0:46:16.640
<v Speaker 1>You might trade up and get him unless none of

0:46:16.640 --> 0:46:18.920
<v Speaker 1>the safeties going in the first round. You know what

0:46:18.960 --> 0:46:22.600
<v Speaker 1>about none of those drafts could happen. Oh, the odds

0:46:22.640 --> 0:46:25.600
<v Speaker 1>that we would nail at that completely are slimth and nuns.

0:46:25.640 --> 0:46:27.560
<v Speaker 1>I would take any one of those though. I would

0:46:27.600 --> 0:46:29.759
<v Speaker 1>take any of those three, would take any one of them.

0:46:29.760 --> 0:46:31.600
<v Speaker 1>I would feel like they did a good job. Yeah,

0:46:31.600 --> 0:46:34.799
<v Speaker 1>it'd be nice. Okay, well, hit let's say it one

0:46:34.800 --> 0:46:37.160
<v Speaker 1>more question. This one's gonna be fun. This is from

0:46:37.239 --> 0:46:41.000
<v Speaker 1>Jay Okay Fellas trying to get proactive here after starting

0:46:41.080 --> 0:46:43.760
<v Speaker 1>or after watching the combine. Isaiah Simmons out of Clemson

0:46:43.880 --> 0:46:46.560
<v Speaker 1>is the best athlete that he has seen since Bo Jackson.

0:46:46.960 --> 0:46:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I'd give up seventeen and next year's one if he

0:46:49.520 --> 0:46:51.799
<v Speaker 1>slid to nine or ten? Would you he's the best

0:46:51.800 --> 0:46:53.520
<v Speaker 1>player in the draft. Is that all I have to

0:46:53.560 --> 0:46:56.560
<v Speaker 1>give seventeen next years one? That's unrealistic. We would have

0:46:56.600 --> 0:46:58.719
<v Speaker 1>to give maybe a two. I don't think that's that

0:46:59.760 --> 0:47:01.560
<v Speaker 1>if he slides to take if he's at ten, you

0:47:01.600 --> 0:47:03.640
<v Speaker 1>can do it for seventeen and your second round pick

0:47:03.760 --> 0:47:05.759
<v Speaker 1>that gets you just to ten. That might not be

0:47:05.800 --> 0:47:08.960
<v Speaker 1>realistic because just on the chart it but maybe he

0:47:09.200 --> 0:47:11.919
<v Speaker 1>don't through it here to the chart, that's the thing, right,

0:47:12.000 --> 0:47:14.839
<v Speaker 1>and they should, But I go by captain trade down. Now,

0:47:15.400 --> 0:47:18.279
<v Speaker 1>did Maurice? Okay, what if we always wins through and

0:47:18.280 --> 0:47:23.440
<v Speaker 1>a four? Well, seventeen, a one next year and a four?

0:47:24.160 --> 0:47:26.880
<v Speaker 1>Would you do it still? I think I would? I

0:47:27.040 --> 0:47:30.359
<v Speaker 1>would in a vacuum. This team is in such a

0:47:30.400 --> 0:47:34.800
<v Speaker 1>desperate mode for affordable labor though. Yeah, but they don't. Okay,

0:47:34.840 --> 0:47:37.640
<v Speaker 1>but it's it's a fourth round pick. They're gonna get

0:47:37.680 --> 0:47:41.760
<v Speaker 1>a comp for Beasley probably while five. So you still

0:47:41.800 --> 0:47:45.080
<v Speaker 1>you're not gonna like lose any like You're not gonna

0:47:45.120 --> 0:47:46.640
<v Speaker 1>have fewer picks, you know what I mean, Like you

0:47:46.680 --> 0:47:49.560
<v Speaker 1>have a surfle and have six. Yeah, it's a fourth

0:47:49.640 --> 0:47:51.000
<v Speaker 1>round pick. How am I not gonna have a first

0:47:51.080 --> 0:47:53.040
<v Speaker 1>round pick next year? Are getting? Yeah, that's gonna have

0:47:53.080 --> 0:47:55.000
<v Speaker 1>like two good players on a rookie because you're gonna

0:47:55.040 --> 0:47:57.279
<v Speaker 1>have a guy that can play eight positions on the

0:47:57.280 --> 0:47:59.920
<v Speaker 1>back end of your defense is and he's an absolute

0:48:00.120 --> 0:48:03.080
<v Speaker 1>super free you're normally against type. But I think he's

0:48:03.120 --> 0:48:06.160
<v Speaker 1>gone on. I think he's awesome. That's why Jeff said

0:48:06.160 --> 0:48:09.200
<v Speaker 1>it right. Like affordable assets, I'd go one and two.

0:48:09.360 --> 0:48:11.640
<v Speaker 1>That's it. I'd go this year's one and two Friday

0:48:11.760 --> 0:48:14.960
<v Speaker 1>Simmons and that's it. Can't be taking multiple ones for me.

0:48:15.560 --> 0:48:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Can't be snatching those things for me, especially for a

0:48:17.880 --> 0:48:21.640
<v Speaker 1>guy that's really for this team. A luxury I'll throw in,

0:48:22.560 --> 0:48:25.640
<v Speaker 1>how how would he a luxury where you're gonna be, like, listen,

0:48:25.640 --> 0:48:27.359
<v Speaker 1>I know you're a linebacker, but you're kind of gonna

0:48:27.360 --> 0:48:29.640
<v Speaker 1>be a strong safety. It cost me two ones, but

0:48:29.719 --> 0:48:31.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it'll work fine. You're gonna be like my

0:48:32.160 --> 0:48:36.560
<v Speaker 1>box safety, big nickel slash, occasional slot slash, occasional free

0:48:36.600 --> 0:48:38.640
<v Speaker 1>safety slash, whatever the hell I want. You to be

0:48:38.680 --> 0:48:41.000
<v Speaker 1>if you told me you could undo a contract that's

0:48:41.000 --> 0:48:43.560
<v Speaker 1>already been done for a linebacker, you can't pick him,

0:48:43.600 --> 0:48:46.799
<v Speaker 1>well let's go No, that's fine, like hey, man, because

0:48:46.800 --> 0:48:48.399
<v Speaker 1>they would bring that dude in and that dude would

0:48:48.400 --> 0:48:50.600
<v Speaker 1>be better than both your linebackers and he would not

0:48:50.719 --> 0:48:53.239
<v Speaker 1>replace them. That's what would happen first round picking a

0:48:53.280 --> 0:48:57.440
<v Speaker 1>paid guys. Worry about play you make Jalen a sam

0:48:57.480 --> 0:49:02.120
<v Speaker 1>slash Nickel rusher slash or whatever. Here we going three four?

0:49:03.160 --> 0:49:06.200
<v Speaker 1>He could? We could? What it sounds I'm doing that

0:49:06.239 --> 0:49:08.560
<v Speaker 1>to him. I've got a lot of commercials and well,

0:49:08.600 --> 0:49:10.799
<v Speaker 1>you got a crap on my dreams. Man. So I

0:49:10.920 --> 0:49:13.160
<v Speaker 1>finally found a player that I'm willing to get reckless

0:49:13.160 --> 0:49:15.120
<v Speaker 1>for and you're telling me it doesn't make any sense.

0:49:15.239 --> 0:49:18.640
<v Speaker 1>But everything makes sense for that man, everything makes sense.

0:49:18.680 --> 0:49:21.319
<v Speaker 1>I just think he can play five positions. We're gonna

0:49:21.320 --> 0:49:24.440
<v Speaker 1>fit in. One more question, Kate, you've got forty five seconds?

0:49:24.480 --> 0:49:26.680
<v Speaker 1>All right? All right, this one's Taylor made for you.

0:49:26.920 --> 0:49:30.279
<v Speaker 1>It says, tell me more, Charlie t tight End Portland State. O,

0:49:30.400 --> 0:49:32.600
<v Speaker 1>my god, how you like this guy? So I chose

0:49:32.600 --> 0:49:35.879
<v Speaker 1>this question? You got now the forty seconds? Okay, well,

0:49:35.880 --> 0:49:39.360
<v Speaker 1>he's the Portland State guy, which you just said. He

0:49:39.440 --> 0:49:42.759
<v Speaker 1>pull up my note. Sorry, three solid years or production. Uh.

0:49:43.400 --> 0:49:45.160
<v Speaker 1>I do need to recheck his time, because I was

0:49:45.160 --> 0:49:47.480
<v Speaker 1>not expecting a question about him to ever come up

0:49:47.480 --> 0:49:49.160
<v Speaker 1>again on the Draft show after I brought him up

0:49:49.160 --> 0:49:54.000
<v Speaker 1>the first day. He brought him up day one. Uh man, No, no,

0:49:54.040 --> 0:49:55.360
<v Speaker 1>I just want to find his time. I don't know

0:49:55.560 --> 0:49:58.120
<v Speaker 1>till my time was. Doesn't matter though. What I saw

0:49:58.239 --> 0:50:00.640
<v Speaker 1>is he had a horrible quarterback and college so as

0:50:00.640 --> 0:50:03.440
<v Speaker 1>a struggle sometimes, but he's a big target underneath. I

0:50:03.440 --> 0:50:07.040
<v Speaker 1>had him at sixty three two forty eight four seven five,

0:50:07.120 --> 0:50:09.560
<v Speaker 1>so a pretty decent time. He didn't put up stinking

0:50:09.640 --> 0:50:12.759
<v Speaker 1>albert O numbers, you know, or anything like that. But

0:50:12.960 --> 0:50:14.920
<v Speaker 1>I thought it was pretty good at working back in

0:50:15.000 --> 0:50:17.160
<v Speaker 1>the scramble drill, working his way back to the quarterback.

0:50:17.200 --> 0:50:19.520
<v Speaker 1>Showed good hands, showed the ability to catch with his hands,

0:50:20.760 --> 0:50:22.680
<v Speaker 1>and not a very good blocker, kind of a getting

0:50:22.719 --> 0:50:25.080
<v Speaker 1>the way guy. But I saw someone his deep day

0:50:25.120 --> 0:50:27.359
<v Speaker 1>three value. I had a fifth round grade aut him

0:50:28.080 --> 0:50:31.680
<v Speaker 1>can play anywhere though. Slide seven five out there? Did

0:50:31.719 --> 0:50:35.040
<v Speaker 1>you give me a four seven five? It's my guy, Charlie.

0:50:35.080 --> 0:50:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Here you go Charlie representing, well, we're out of time

0:50:38.360 --> 0:50:40.520
<v Speaker 1>there for Twitter on the twenty. We're almost out of

0:50:40.520 --> 0:50:42.000
<v Speaker 1>time here for the Draft show, but we're gonna take

0:50:42.000 --> 0:50:44.279
<v Speaker 1>a quick break. When we come back. We'll wrap up

0:50:44.320 --> 0:50:47.640
<v Speaker 1>some of our stock downs from the NFL Combine. We'll

0:50:47.640 --> 0:50:49.600
<v Speaker 1>do that when we return here from the Star in Frisco.

0:50:50.360 --> 0:50:54.160
<v Speaker 1>Since eighteen sixty five, Stetson hats are American maid with

0:50:54.280 --> 0:50:57.440
<v Speaker 1>pride right here in Texas, and Stetson is proud to

0:50:57.480 --> 0:50:59.839
<v Speaker 1>be on the field with America's team. Want to show

0:50:59.880 --> 0:51:03.719
<v Speaker 1>your Texas and team pride too? You can by purchasing

0:51:03.719 --> 0:51:06.080
<v Speaker 1>your own Stepson. You can look just like how the

0:51:06.120 --> 0:51:09.480
<v Speaker 1>flag guys do on field at every home game. Stepson

0:51:09.600 --> 0:51:12.840
<v Speaker 1>heads the official crown of all self respecting Cowboys and

0:51:13.120 --> 0:51:16.560
<v Speaker 1>your favorite football team. Get yours today in the Stadium

0:51:16.600 --> 0:51:20.560
<v Speaker 1>pro Shop or at Stetson dot com their new apartments big.

0:51:20.800 --> 0:51:25.640
<v Speaker 1>Such a great deal. It's okay, just okay. What's not

0:51:28.239 --> 0:51:32.040
<v Speaker 1>right about the subway? Well, I bet you don't even

0:51:32.080 --> 0:51:37.440
<v Speaker 1>notice it after that's my neighbor. Hang deal, that's just okay,

0:51:37.640 --> 0:51:41.280
<v Speaker 1>it's not okay. Get a great deal with America's best network.

0:51:41.520 --> 0:51:43.200
<v Speaker 1>Come into an AT and T store to find out

0:51:43.200 --> 0:51:45.319
<v Speaker 1>how to get one of our popular smartphones for zero

0:51:45.360 --> 0:51:48.480
<v Speaker 1>dollars down based on GWS one scurse September twenty nineteen.

0:51:48.680 --> 0:51:52.280
<v Speaker 1>Eslor is a proud sponsor of the Dallas Cowboys, helping

0:51:52.320 --> 0:51:55.840
<v Speaker 1>fans see more and do more with our best vision solutions.

0:51:55.840 --> 0:51:58.920
<v Speaker 1>Our lens technologies reveal a world more beautiful than you

0:51:58.960 --> 0:52:01.520
<v Speaker 1>can imagine for lim at a time. Get the slur

0:52:01.640 --> 0:52:04.120
<v Speaker 1>next gen offered. Were you buy the latest generation of

0:52:04.160 --> 0:52:07.239
<v Speaker 1>Transitions lenses, would select Slor lenses. You can choose a

0:52:07.280 --> 0:52:10.640
<v Speaker 1>second pair of clear lenses for free with qualifying frame purchases.

0:52:10.760 --> 0:52:14.920
<v Speaker 1>Restrictions apply. Find a participating eyecare professional by visiting slur

0:52:15.080 --> 0:52:20.040
<v Speaker 1>usa dot com. See More, Do More. So you're shopping,

0:52:20.560 --> 0:52:23.640
<v Speaker 1>and that's when you see it. I old twenty three

0:52:23.719 --> 0:52:25.880
<v Speaker 1>Doctor Pepper stack from top to bottom as far as

0:52:25.920 --> 0:52:27.759
<v Speaker 1>the eye can see. The phrase two going to be

0:52:27.760 --> 0:52:29.759
<v Speaker 1>true comes to mind. Get there. It is a rich,

0:52:29.840 --> 0:52:34.480
<v Speaker 1>delicious doctor Pepper paradise. Wait did did that can of

0:52:34.560 --> 0:52:38.000
<v Speaker 1>doctor Pepper just open itself for you? They all are

0:52:38.520 --> 0:52:40.920
<v Speaker 1>as if to say so nice to treat you. And

0:52:40.960 --> 0:52:42.640
<v Speaker 1>even though it feels weird to talk to we, can

0:52:42.640 --> 0:52:44.799
<v Speaker 1>you pick one up and say it's so nice to

0:52:44.840 --> 0:52:52.600
<v Speaker 1>be treated doctor Pepper, so nice to treat you. Yeah,

0:52:52.760 --> 0:52:56.560
<v Speaker 1>looking outside at the Ford Center, A beautiful Thursday, another

0:52:56.600 --> 0:52:59.600
<v Speaker 1>great day for the Natlas Cowboys dot Com Draft show.

0:52:59.640 --> 0:53:03.880
<v Speaker 1>Forty nine days until the draft in Las Vegas, Nevada.

0:53:03.920 --> 0:53:07.920
<v Speaker 1>In our final segment here from the SWBC Mortgage Studios,

0:53:07.960 --> 0:53:10.799
<v Speaker 1>and we started this earlier in the show, stock Up

0:53:10.840 --> 0:53:13.440
<v Speaker 1>stock Down. We got through all our stock ups. Jeff

0:53:13.480 --> 0:53:15.960
<v Speaker 1>got his stock down snuck in there, thank you. And

0:53:16.080 --> 0:53:18.160
<v Speaker 1>now we've got to go to Kat who were some

0:53:18.200 --> 0:53:20.920
<v Speaker 1>of your stockdowns from the twenty twenty NFL's County Combat.

0:53:21.080 --> 0:53:23.040
<v Speaker 1>He's a guy who I actually came around on on

0:53:23.120 --> 0:53:25.840
<v Speaker 1>tape and everyone thought highly of him going into this season,

0:53:25.880 --> 0:53:28.480
<v Speaker 1>and then he had a bad year. He had twenty catches,

0:53:28.520 --> 0:53:30.360
<v Speaker 1>but he played for an offense that was a complete

0:53:30.400 --> 0:53:34.880
<v Speaker 1>dumpster fire. But it's Titan Jared Peatney of Vanderbilt. And

0:53:34.920 --> 0:53:36.799
<v Speaker 1>then I get nervous because he looked slow at the

0:53:37.280 --> 0:53:40.319
<v Speaker 1>Senior Bowl and then he went and his numbers tell

0:53:40.400 --> 0:53:42.640
<v Speaker 1>you a four nine six forty yard dash. He didn't

0:53:42.640 --> 0:53:45.200
<v Speaker 1>participate in anything else because he's not that great of

0:53:45.200 --> 0:53:47.160
<v Speaker 1>an athlete, and I thought he was better than that

0:53:47.560 --> 0:53:50.840
<v Speaker 1>he was. You know what, we watched him on tape,

0:53:51.320 --> 0:53:53.200
<v Speaker 1>go catch the ball with his hands, go make some

0:53:53.280 --> 0:53:56.440
<v Speaker 1>tough catches. Could be a matchup issue. I did not

0:53:56.520 --> 0:53:59.120
<v Speaker 1>see four nine six coming. I didn't think he was

0:53:59.160 --> 0:54:01.960
<v Speaker 1>going to run that. So Jared Pinckney is now a

0:54:02.120 --> 0:54:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Day three flyer. He is a guy that teams are

0:54:04.640 --> 0:54:06.799
<v Speaker 1>gonna be nervous about. They're gonna wonder if he works hard.

0:54:06.840 --> 0:54:08.839
<v Speaker 1>They're gonna wonder if he's got the ability to stay

0:54:08.840 --> 0:54:12.319
<v Speaker 1>in shape. They're gonna ask questions about dude, or do

0:54:12.360 --> 0:54:15.839
<v Speaker 1>you even care because you just don't see it. Maybe

0:54:15.840 --> 0:54:18.359
<v Speaker 1>he just can't do that, you know, maybe he just

0:54:18.400 --> 0:54:22.680
<v Speaker 1>can't show that athleticism. Get separation. But man, he had

0:54:22.760 --> 0:54:25.000
<v Speaker 1>such a good year in twenty eighteen with fifty catches

0:54:25.040 --> 0:54:27.719
<v Speaker 1>and came into the year, you know was hey, this

0:54:27.760 --> 0:54:29.560
<v Speaker 1>could be a tight end one tight end two tight

0:54:29.640 --> 0:54:31.640
<v Speaker 1>in three type of guy, and he has just disappeared.

0:54:31.680 --> 0:54:36.960
<v Speaker 1>He had a rough combine. I thought he could on tape.

0:54:36.960 --> 0:54:39.680
<v Speaker 1>I thought he could win in one on one situations,

0:54:39.760 --> 0:54:41.640
<v Speaker 1>go track the ball and do things like that. But

0:54:42.520 --> 0:54:45.040
<v Speaker 1>four nine six that's just not gonna work. You're slowing

0:54:45.080 --> 0:54:47.840
<v Speaker 1>down my offense and his twenty eighteen tape was so good.

0:54:48.080 --> 0:54:49.839
<v Speaker 1>It was very good. That's one of the things that's

0:54:49.840 --> 0:54:52.359
<v Speaker 1>so disappointing with Pinckney is that he looked like, at

0:54:52.400 --> 0:54:56.160
<v Speaker 1>least going into his final season with the Commodoreds, is

0:54:56.160 --> 0:54:58.080
<v Speaker 1>that he was going to be a guy to look

0:54:58.080 --> 0:55:00.480
<v Speaker 1>for as a first second day tight end. He shouldn't

0:55:00.480 --> 0:55:02.120
<v Speaker 1>have gone back. If he wouldn't have gone back to

0:55:02.200 --> 0:55:04.160
<v Speaker 1>Vanderbilt and people have gone in the drags last year,

0:55:04.200 --> 0:55:06.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, he's probably gone on first step. Still would

0:55:06.960 --> 0:55:08.879
<v Speaker 1>have had to get time day one day too, still

0:55:08.960 --> 0:55:12.959
<v Speaker 1>had to get time. Yeah. Absolutely, you're such an ass sometimes.

0:55:13.840 --> 0:55:16.520
<v Speaker 1>That's why I listened. They should all hire me. I

0:55:16.560 --> 0:55:18.520
<v Speaker 1>would be like, here's what you've been running. We're not

0:55:18.600 --> 0:55:21.239
<v Speaker 1>running They both about Prodey, We're not run running it

0:55:21.520 --> 0:55:23.400
<v Speaker 1>because that's what everybody's like, Oh, he didn't run the combine,

0:55:23.400 --> 0:55:25.160
<v Speaker 1>but he's gonna run his product. No, if we're gonna

0:55:25.200 --> 0:55:27.440
<v Speaker 1>have bad times, we're running it. Neither. Yeah, but we're

0:55:27.440 --> 0:55:30.280
<v Speaker 1>trying to make money. If you don't have like top

0:55:30.360 --> 0:55:34.000
<v Speaker 1>notch tape, you're gonna run the risk of alienating yourself

0:55:34.040 --> 0:55:36.520
<v Speaker 1>because people expect to see that. I mean, but if

0:55:36.520 --> 0:55:38.600
<v Speaker 1>you don't have top notch tape and you run a

0:55:38.640 --> 0:55:42.120
<v Speaker 1>five flat, what's a team? I thought his tape was good.

0:55:42.160 --> 0:55:45.040
<v Speaker 1>If Pinckney doesn't run, what's a team gonna assume? Worst case?

0:55:45.120 --> 0:55:48.000
<v Speaker 1>Probably better than what he ran. Yeah, yeah, I thought

0:55:48.000 --> 0:55:50.480
<v Speaker 1>his tape was good. Now twenty catches, you go, huh,

0:55:50.640 --> 0:55:52.800
<v Speaker 1>what's going on? But that offense to go off of

0:55:53.200 --> 0:55:55.759
<v Speaker 1>the Lipscomb is a good wide receiver Colladia. Lipscom is

0:55:55.760 --> 0:55:58.359
<v Speaker 1>a good wide receiver who played at Vanderbilt, and he's

0:55:58.360 --> 0:56:01.680
<v Speaker 1>got didn't have it anything like because Sean Vaughn the

0:56:01.760 --> 0:56:04.120
<v Speaker 1>running back. Yeah, it's a good player. That's just a

0:56:04.239 --> 0:56:06.360
<v Speaker 1>It was a bad offense. They had no offensive line.

0:56:06.600 --> 0:56:09.080
<v Speaker 1>They just didn't have a chance. The quarterback wasn't very good,

0:56:09.560 --> 0:56:14.120
<v Speaker 1>And I thought his tape was fine. I'm the ted

0:56:14.239 --> 0:56:17.719
<v Speaker 1>The Senior Bowl was a big red flag. You know,

0:56:17.920 --> 0:56:20.120
<v Speaker 1>it was a big red flag. He just looked slower

0:56:20.120 --> 0:56:22.680
<v Speaker 1>than everyone and then yo, wait he is slower than everyone,

0:56:22.880 --> 0:56:24.439
<v Speaker 1>and maybe he just didn't really see that on tape.

0:56:24.480 --> 0:56:27.160
<v Speaker 1>The other guy who had a stock down on is

0:56:27.239 --> 0:56:31.120
<v Speaker 1>Bradley and Nye defensive end from Utah. Jeff, you like

0:56:31.239 --> 0:56:33.680
<v Speaker 1>a Nye quite a bit. Yeah, this defensive end class

0:56:33.760 --> 0:56:36.920
<v Speaker 1>just keeps getting less and less encouraging that it was

0:56:36.960 --> 0:56:40.920
<v Speaker 1>about Curtis Weaver. He was a stock up guy. Gosh, am,

0:56:40.920 --> 0:56:42.919
<v Speaker 1>I gonna have to put Curtis Weaver ahead of an Eye.

0:56:43.080 --> 0:56:45.120
<v Speaker 1>I had a full round difference going into the combine,

0:56:45.160 --> 0:56:46.920
<v Speaker 1>and we were in the third and nine in the second,

0:56:47.080 --> 0:56:50.440
<v Speaker 1>and now they're kind of neck and neck. Weaver might

0:56:50.480 --> 0:56:53.560
<v Speaker 1>be the better prospect. I mean, I bat terrible three

0:56:53.600 --> 0:56:56.239
<v Speaker 1>cone bad jumps. I mean, if you're gonna be a

0:56:56.400 --> 0:56:59.759
<v Speaker 1>sub two hundred and sixty pound defensive end, you gotta

0:56:59.800 --> 0:57:02.799
<v Speaker 1>be athletic. Which one are these numbers worse? For the

0:57:02.840 --> 0:57:05.359
<v Speaker 1>fact that Bradley and is a defensive end and then

0:57:05.480 --> 0:57:08.000
<v Speaker 1>Jared Pinkney's a tight end and their numbers are similar

0:57:08.040 --> 0:57:10.560
<v Speaker 1>in the fifth or in the forty? Which one? Which

0:57:10.600 --> 0:57:12.439
<v Speaker 1>one is? Are you supposed to run down the field

0:57:12.440 --> 0:57:15.360
<v Speaker 1>and catch the ball? Yeah, that's why works for Pinkney.

0:57:15.400 --> 0:57:17.720
<v Speaker 1>It definitely works for Pinney. I guess with an eye.

0:57:17.360 --> 0:57:20.800
<v Speaker 1>I wasn't expecting him to to, you know, tear it

0:57:20.880 --> 0:57:23.000
<v Speaker 1>up or anything. You watch him on tape, you don't

0:57:23.040 --> 0:57:24.720
<v Speaker 1>see that. It was a middle round guy. I was

0:57:24.760 --> 0:57:28.760
<v Speaker 1>hoping seven and a seven one three cone. I go, okay,

0:57:28.800 --> 0:57:31.560
<v Speaker 1>all right, and you start to look at it's it's

0:57:31.600 --> 0:57:34.200
<v Speaker 1>combining all of it and normally don't care too much,

0:57:34.240 --> 0:57:37.919
<v Speaker 1>but like even some of the shuttles and things like that,

0:57:38.400 --> 0:57:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the three cone you take into it, and you know

0:57:40.400 --> 0:57:42.600
<v Speaker 1>his arms, dude, his arms are so small too. And

0:57:42.640 --> 0:57:44.560
<v Speaker 1>a defensive end. I need you to have some linked

0:57:44.560 --> 0:57:47.600
<v Speaker 1>out there. So that's something that really bothers me, with

0:57:47.640 --> 0:57:51.880
<v Speaker 1>the alligator arms out there a defensive end. Dave stock Down,

0:57:52.960 --> 0:57:55.320
<v Speaker 1>this is this is harsh because I actually this is

0:57:55.360 --> 0:57:58.960
<v Speaker 1>one of my favorite guys. We all we all like no, okay,

0:57:59.120 --> 0:58:02.440
<v Speaker 1>but I'm not ready to pull the plug on Cameron Danzler,

0:58:02.520 --> 0:58:05.720
<v Speaker 1>so we like him a lot. Big range cornerback Mississippi State.

0:58:05.880 --> 0:58:08.120
<v Speaker 1>You turn on the tape, he stays with some of

0:58:08.160 --> 0:58:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the best receivers in the game. He gave up and

0:58:10.680 --> 0:58:13.160
<v Speaker 1>you know it sounds like bad. He gave up fifty

0:58:13.240 --> 0:58:15.800
<v Speaker 1>yards and a touchdown to Jamar Chase of LSU compared

0:58:15.840 --> 0:58:17.680
<v Speaker 1>to what Chase did too. You're going to show me

0:58:17.760 --> 0:58:19.680
<v Speaker 1>the other play. I only saw a six yard out

0:58:19.680 --> 0:58:21.800
<v Speaker 1>that he got caught on point. He played really well

0:58:21.800 --> 0:58:23.800
<v Speaker 1>against Jamar Chase. Let's put it that way, Chase had

0:58:23.800 --> 0:58:25.480
<v Speaker 1>fifty yards and touchdown in the game, and he played

0:58:25.560 --> 0:58:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Davante Smith at Alabama really well. He got beat on

0:58:28.080 --> 0:58:30.440
<v Speaker 1>an out and up and that's about it. Everything you

0:58:30.480 --> 0:58:33.600
<v Speaker 1>like in a cornerback until he runs a four sixty

0:58:34.160 --> 0:58:36.840
<v Speaker 1>and again, it's probably the one position where a forty

0:58:36.880 --> 0:58:39.160
<v Speaker 1>yard dash can make or break you. It's a risk,

0:58:39.200 --> 0:58:41.680
<v Speaker 1>it's just a risk thing, but it is very few

0:58:41.680 --> 0:58:44.360
<v Speaker 1>and four. It's interesting though, because again, if you have

0:58:44.720 --> 0:58:49.640
<v Speaker 1>thirteen games of tape of him sticking with SEC caliber receivers,

0:58:50.240 --> 0:58:52.880
<v Speaker 1>how much does a four six forty scare you? Well,

0:58:52.880 --> 0:58:56.360
<v Speaker 1>does he start getting penalized more? Because he's a really physical, yeah,

0:58:56.440 --> 0:58:59.360
<v Speaker 1>all over the field kind of guy. I just I'll

0:58:59.360 --> 0:59:01.520
<v Speaker 1>tell you what I did with him. I had him

0:59:01.560 --> 0:59:04.480
<v Speaker 1>as an early second rounder and now I have him

0:59:04.520 --> 0:59:06.560
<v Speaker 1>at the top of the third round. That's how much

0:59:06.920 --> 0:59:09.160
<v Speaker 1>four six at mid four six scares me. Because I've

0:59:09.160 --> 0:59:11.600
<v Speaker 1>done this before with Tease Taber. I stood on his tape,

0:59:11.680 --> 0:59:13.680
<v Speaker 1>I was like, I believe, I believe in this dude.

0:59:13.960 --> 0:59:15.360
<v Speaker 1>But the fact that he ran a four to seven

0:59:15.400 --> 0:59:17.520
<v Speaker 1>it was over. I can't do it. And so at

0:59:17.520 --> 0:59:19.919
<v Speaker 1>four six four Josh Norman did it for a while

0:59:20.040 --> 0:59:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Richard Sherman's done it. But outside of that, it's like,

0:59:22.120 --> 0:59:24.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm baby and Howard, where can you find him? Yeah,

0:59:24.360 --> 0:59:26.760
<v Speaker 1>it's very rare. I'm putting a pin in it. Well,

0:59:26.800 --> 0:59:28.880
<v Speaker 1>and I think a big thing is we're not talking

0:59:28.920 --> 0:59:31.120
<v Speaker 1>about him as a first round pick. Yeah we never right,

0:59:31.680 --> 0:59:33.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm putting a pin in it. I'm gonna give him

0:59:33.440 --> 0:59:35.280
<v Speaker 1>a chance to run at his pro day, and he

0:59:35.320 --> 0:59:37.720
<v Speaker 1>came out on Twitter like he was unhappy with his time.

0:59:37.800 --> 0:59:40.400
<v Speaker 1>So he's gonna get back in the lab and if

0:59:40.440 --> 0:59:43.320
<v Speaker 1>he can like get closer to four to six, maybe

0:59:43.360 --> 0:59:46.200
<v Speaker 1>even crack like high four or five, get him at

0:59:46.360 --> 0:59:49.240
<v Speaker 1>get him at thirty. Yeah, yeah, where's Brian to turn

0:59:49.320 --> 0:59:51.240
<v Speaker 1>the clock off at the thirty eight yard line? It

0:59:51.400 --> 0:59:54.080
<v Speaker 1>is legit, Like it's hard to find those guys who

0:59:54.120 --> 0:59:56.880
<v Speaker 1>are casey. Here was another guy who ran really slow,

0:59:57.560 --> 1:00:00.480
<v Speaker 1>like a forty and table day that since into your

1:00:00.520 --> 1:00:02.680
<v Speaker 1>career by any means no, no, And I think his

1:00:02.840 --> 1:00:05.800
<v Speaker 1>tape gives you a little bit of hope, like, Okay,

1:00:05.840 --> 1:00:08.680
<v Speaker 1>this is something if you can stick with. If you

1:00:08.720 --> 1:00:11.760
<v Speaker 1>can stick with the guys at LSU, you can play cornerback,

1:00:11.800 --> 1:00:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Like those are all pro receivers now. I'm burning that

1:00:13.960 --> 1:00:16.440
<v Speaker 1>pick pick fifty one in the second round, and I'm

1:00:16.600 --> 1:00:19.400
<v Speaker 1>so nervous about that at all. We'll see send that

1:00:19.440 --> 1:00:21.680
<v Speaker 1>to Damon our Nett and then you'd pick dancer the

1:00:21.680 --> 1:00:24.440
<v Speaker 1>next round. Yeah, and just because we're running short on time,

1:00:24.920 --> 1:00:28.000
<v Speaker 1>Jones was your other guy, which I mean, Hamilton's not

1:00:28.080 --> 1:00:31.439
<v Speaker 1>impressive athletically either, but like Benito, Jones brought up the rear,

1:00:31.720 --> 1:00:34.040
<v Speaker 1>like just across the board, and I don't I don't

1:00:34.080 --> 1:00:36.640
<v Speaker 1>believe he even benched, which was like the one thing

1:00:36.680 --> 1:00:39.640
<v Speaker 1>he was probably gonna be good at. I mean, the

1:00:39.720 --> 1:00:42.440
<v Speaker 1>numbers speak for themselves. Senior Bowl, I saw like a

1:00:42.440 --> 1:00:44.520
<v Speaker 1>few plays, a few one on ones, and I was like, oh,

1:00:44.560 --> 1:00:46.200
<v Speaker 1>this guy's interesting. I turned on the tape and I

1:00:46.240 --> 1:00:47.919
<v Speaker 1>was like, how come he falls on every place? He's

1:00:47.920 --> 1:00:49.880
<v Speaker 1>on the ground a lot. He's a fall down guy,

1:00:49.920 --> 1:00:51.960
<v Speaker 1>I think people. And again we're not talking about first

1:00:52.000 --> 1:00:54.280
<v Speaker 1>and second round picks, but like, if I had to

1:00:54.320 --> 1:00:56.880
<v Speaker 1>peg him going into this, I would have said, like, oh,

1:00:56.880 --> 1:00:59.120
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, like a fourth round, fifth round guy.

1:00:59.360 --> 1:01:01.760
<v Speaker 1>But I don't feel I feel like I just I'm

1:01:01.800 --> 1:01:04.160
<v Speaker 1>just pushing him even further. Just like if you got

1:01:04.200 --> 1:01:06.480
<v Speaker 1>twelve picks, you can use one of your seves on him.

1:01:06.520 --> 1:01:08.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm not feeling great about it. I've got one of

1:01:08.400 --> 1:01:11.560
<v Speaker 1>those guys in my stock down, a guy who I

1:01:11.640 --> 1:01:14.160
<v Speaker 1>thought may have been a guy you could have looked

1:01:14.160 --> 1:01:17.919
<v Speaker 1>at in a late round scenario. Two stockdowns. kJ Hill,

1:01:17.960 --> 1:01:20.760
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver of Ohio State. I did not think he

1:01:20.840 --> 1:01:23.040
<v Speaker 1>had a good combine. He didn't. I thought he had

1:01:23.080 --> 1:01:26.160
<v Speaker 1>a perfect comb So no, I'm with Kevin. Get him

1:01:26.160 --> 1:01:31.840
<v Speaker 1>in the fourth round. Not explosive, it's not real big. Oh,

1:01:31.880 --> 1:01:33.920
<v Speaker 1>he probably dropped the ball. I'll take him in the

1:01:33.960 --> 1:01:37.360
<v Speaker 1>fourth and then Mitchell Wilcox out of USF. This is

1:01:37.400 --> 1:01:40.120
<v Speaker 1>a tight end that we have not mentioned before. He

1:01:40.200 --> 1:01:42.440
<v Speaker 1>wasn't expected to be a guy to light up the combine,

1:01:42.480 --> 1:01:44.320
<v Speaker 1>and nor did he. He had some pretty poor numbers.

1:01:44.320 --> 1:01:46.680
<v Speaker 1>But he also had the most embarrassing moment of the combine.

1:01:47.120 --> 1:01:49.240
<v Speaker 1>He got hit in the face. Well, he was trying

1:01:49.280 --> 1:01:52.440
<v Speaker 1>to catch his gad, he didn't know which way to

1:01:52.480 --> 1:01:55.959
<v Speaker 1>turn for the first got him right in the side

1:01:55.960 --> 1:01:59.040
<v Speaker 1>of the face. So that is why I said his

1:01:59.120 --> 1:02:01.480
<v Speaker 1>stock went down. I'm really glad we line up on

1:02:01.560 --> 1:02:04.320
<v Speaker 1>kJ Hill because I mean I saw him make people

1:02:04.360 --> 1:02:06.000
<v Speaker 1>look silly all week at the Senior Bowl. I don't

1:02:06.000 --> 1:02:09.040
<v Speaker 1>care if he runs a four six. I'm not drafting

1:02:09.120 --> 1:02:10.920
<v Speaker 1>him in the top one hundred, but start him in

1:02:10.920 --> 1:02:12.880
<v Speaker 1>the scene. He can hang around to the fourth round.

1:02:12.920 --> 1:02:16.640
<v Speaker 1>Let's party. He's Jarvis sladry Um. Say no more family.

1:02:17.120 --> 1:02:21.200
<v Speaker 1>How much like a discount doctor Thunder? You know brand?

1:02:22.000 --> 1:02:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Sign Sign me on you pick one eighteen, let's go.

1:02:26.240 --> 1:02:28.560
<v Speaker 1>Well that is gonna do it. Here for the Dallas

1:02:28.600 --> 1:02:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys dot Com Draft show, wrapping up the NFL combine

1:02:32.960 --> 1:02:36.960
<v Speaker 1>will continue breaking down this twenty twenty NFL Draft. We're

1:02:37.040 --> 1:02:39.600
<v Speaker 1>under fifty days away. Thanks for watching. We'll see you

1:02:39.600 --> 1:02:50.200
<v Speaker 1>next week. This has been a production of Dallas Cowboys

1:02:50.240 --> 1:03:00.320
<v Speaker 1>dot Com and the Dallas Cowboys Football Club, whom