WEBVTT - Tech News: Russia Shuts Down Instagram

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.760
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to tech Stuff, a production from I Heart Radio.

0:00:12.039 --> 0:00:14.760
<v Speaker 1>Hey there, and welcome to tech Stuff. I'm your host,

0:00:14.840 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan Strickland. I'm an executive producer with I Heart Radio.

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:20.360
<v Speaker 1>And how the tech are you. It's time for the

0:00:20.400 --> 0:00:25.959
<v Speaker 1>tech news for March twenty twenty two. And while I

0:00:26.000 --> 0:00:28.480
<v Speaker 1>see a lot of folks behaving as if the pandemic

0:00:28.840 --> 0:00:31.920
<v Speaker 1>we're totally over, we're not really out of the woods yet.

0:00:32.520 --> 0:00:36.320
<v Speaker 1>Over in China, there's been a concerning COVID nineteen outbreak,

0:00:36.720 --> 0:00:41.640
<v Speaker 1>technically the largest in two years, and in response, various

0:00:41.680 --> 0:00:45.920
<v Speaker 1>regional and city government officials have tightened restrictions in different

0:00:45.960 --> 0:00:48.320
<v Speaker 1>areas of China in an effort to stop the spread

0:00:48.360 --> 0:00:51.560
<v Speaker 1>of the virus, and that has subsequently had a huge

0:00:51.600 --> 0:00:56.560
<v Speaker 1>impact on certain manufacturing facilities in Shinjin uh These include

0:00:56.600 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 1>fox con, which is the company that supplies many component

0:01:00.040 --> 0:01:03.960
<v Speaker 1>it's for various apple products. But in addition, you have

0:01:04.000 --> 0:01:09.559
<v Speaker 1>other companies like Intel, Volkswagen, and Toyota having major manufacturing

0:01:09.560 --> 0:01:12.800
<v Speaker 1>facilities in the area that have had to scale back

0:01:12.880 --> 0:01:16.679
<v Speaker 1>or even halt production. The Chinese government has created an

0:01:16.720 --> 0:01:20.000
<v Speaker 1>allowance for companies if those companies are able to create

0:01:20.319 --> 0:01:23.120
<v Speaker 1>a sort of bubble for their workers. And by bubble,

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:25.959
<v Speaker 1>I mean there really has to be a controlled, closed

0:01:26.040 --> 0:01:29.959
<v Speaker 1>environment within which workers aren't just doing their jobs but

0:01:30.000 --> 0:01:33.720
<v Speaker 1>are actually living there as well. In other words, it's

0:01:33.720 --> 0:01:35.520
<v Speaker 1>only a bubble if there's no way out of it.

0:01:35.760 --> 0:01:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Though this does not necessarily mean that employees would be

0:01:38.480 --> 0:01:41.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, confined to the same structure for both working

0:01:41.880 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 1>and living. You know, they might have like a dormitory

0:01:45.760 --> 0:01:50.120
<v Speaker 1>or something in addition to the factory. Still, that's a

0:01:50.160 --> 0:01:53.840
<v Speaker 1>big yikes. Some companies like fox Con are attempting to

0:01:53.880 --> 0:01:58.440
<v Speaker 1>shift operations to other manufacturing facilities inside China that are

0:01:58.480 --> 0:02:02.120
<v Speaker 1>not seeing the same eyes in COVID cases. And it's

0:02:02.160 --> 0:02:05.080
<v Speaker 1>too early yet to say for sure to what extent

0:02:05.160 --> 0:02:08.600
<v Speaker 1>these events are going to have on things like supply

0:02:08.720 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 1>chain issues, but some analysts already are worried that we

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:15.480
<v Speaker 1>could see the effects of this lasting as long as

0:02:15.680 --> 0:02:18.480
<v Speaker 1>six months before we're able to close the gap that

0:02:18.520 --> 0:02:22.480
<v Speaker 1>would be created by you know, these these slowdowns and

0:02:22.480 --> 0:02:27.720
<v Speaker 1>and stoppages. Some might argue that China's zero case policy

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:32.079
<v Speaker 1>toward COVID is too extreme and should be amended. Uh,

0:02:32.120 --> 0:02:34.440
<v Speaker 1>And it's kind of hard to push back on that.

0:02:34.560 --> 0:02:37.680
<v Speaker 1>So on the one hand, obviously you don't want outbreaks.

0:02:38.120 --> 0:02:41.000
<v Speaker 1>On the other, shutting everything down every time there's a

0:02:41.080 --> 0:02:45.560
<v Speaker 1>rise in cases causes massive disruptions like these. However, as

0:02:45.560 --> 0:02:48.560
<v Speaker 1>long as the illness poses a significant risk to people's lives,

0:02:48.880 --> 0:02:51.720
<v Speaker 1>I personally find it very hard to say, you know,

0:02:51.760 --> 0:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>it's worth the risk. So this is a really tough call.

0:02:54.639 --> 0:02:57.919
<v Speaker 1>And I'm not saying that I have all the answers.

0:02:58.720 --> 0:03:02.280
<v Speaker 1>I know I don't want people to get sick, but

0:03:02.600 --> 0:03:07.640
<v Speaker 1>I also recognize the challenges that come about when you

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 1>know you have these massive interruptions and supply chains. Speaking

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:14.560
<v Speaker 1>of fox Con, the company is rumored to have submitted

0:03:14.560 --> 0:03:18.760
<v Speaker 1>a proposal to build a nine billion dollar manufacturing facility

0:03:18.800 --> 0:03:23.840
<v Speaker 1>in Saudi Arabia. This facility would make microchips and electronic

0:03:23.919 --> 0:03:26.960
<v Speaker 1>components for other companies, you know, stuff like displays, that

0:03:27.040 --> 0:03:30.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of thing. Again, for the fox cons customers are

0:03:30.480 --> 0:03:34.399
<v Speaker 1>not people like you and and me. That's it's big

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:39.119
<v Speaker 1>companies like Apple Now. Reportedly, the logic behind this move

0:03:39.240 --> 0:03:43.080
<v Speaker 1>largely comes from the tenuous relationship between China and the

0:03:43.160 --> 0:03:47.960
<v Speaker 1>United States. Most of fox CON's customers, like the aforementioned Apple,

0:03:48.040 --> 0:03:51.840
<v Speaker 1>are from outside China. Of course, Saudi Arabia has its

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:55.480
<v Speaker 1>own tenuous relationship with the US. The country is associated

0:03:55.520 --> 0:03:58.240
<v Speaker 1>with a multitude of human rights violations as well as

0:03:58.280 --> 0:04:01.920
<v Speaker 1>crimes such as the murder of journalist Jamal Kashow Game.

0:04:02.640 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 1>There have been numerous dignitaries and activists who have repeatedly

0:04:06.600 --> 0:04:10.160
<v Speaker 1>called upon the United States to impose sanctions against Saudi Arabia.

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:13.440
<v Speaker 1>To get into all of that would require really an

0:04:13.600 --> 0:04:16.560
<v Speaker 1>entire series of podcasts, and I'm pretty sure by the

0:04:16.680 --> 0:04:19.800
<v Speaker 1>end of that I would be a jaded, cynical husk

0:04:19.920 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>of a host. But anyway, fox Con is reportedly looking

0:04:23.360 --> 0:04:27.440
<v Speaker 1>at other potential sites as well, including the United Arab Emirates,

0:04:27.440 --> 0:04:32.880
<v Speaker 1>so it's not just Saudi Arabia. Russia has blocked Instagram, which,

0:04:32.920 --> 0:04:36.640
<v Speaker 1>according to Adam Massari, the head of Instagram, means that

0:04:36.760 --> 0:04:39.800
<v Speaker 1>eighty million people within Russia will be cut off from

0:04:39.800 --> 0:04:42.720
<v Speaker 1>each other. I personally think that that statement goes a

0:04:42.720 --> 0:04:46.200
<v Speaker 1>little far, because presumably Russians are using other means of

0:04:46.200 --> 0:04:49.239
<v Speaker 1>staying in touch. Plus it ignores the use of tools

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:52.640
<v Speaker 1>like VPNs virtual private networks in order to get around

0:04:52.720 --> 0:04:57.240
<v Speaker 1>things like regional bands. But you know, it really does

0:04:57.320 --> 0:04:59.240
<v Speaker 1>represent a pretty major move on the part of the

0:04:59.279 --> 0:05:02.520
<v Speaker 1>Russian government meant. Now, the reason for the ban, Russian

0:05:02.520 --> 0:05:06.360
<v Speaker 1>officials have said is that Meta quote made an unprecedented

0:05:06.400 --> 0:05:09.680
<v Speaker 1>decision by allowing the posting of information containing calls for

0:05:09.839 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>violence against Russian citizens on its social networks Facebook and Instagram.

0:05:15.160 --> 0:05:19.360
<v Speaker 1>End quote. Now, in this case, those calls for violence

0:05:19.920 --> 0:05:24.160
<v Speaker 1>refer mainly to posts that urge Ukrainians to defend themselves

0:05:24.240 --> 0:05:28.400
<v Speaker 1>against Russian soldiers. Meta reps have said that they made

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:31.800
<v Speaker 1>the determination that these messages should be protected under freedom

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:35.120
<v Speaker 1>of speech because they are framed within the context of

0:05:35.240 --> 0:05:39.640
<v Speaker 1>self defense and fighting back against an invasion, as opposed to,

0:05:40.080 --> 0:05:45.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, calling out attacks on a people for some

0:05:45.400 --> 0:05:48.680
<v Speaker 1>other reason. So the Russian government has been hard at

0:05:48.720 --> 0:05:51.960
<v Speaker 1>work presenting the invasion in as positive a light as

0:05:52.000 --> 0:05:55.720
<v Speaker 1>possible back in Russia, and my guess is that this

0:05:55.960 --> 0:06:00.280
<v Speaker 1>became increasingly difficult as social networks sort of bypassed Ussian

0:06:00.360 --> 0:06:04.640
<v Speaker 1>propaganda channels. Also, um, I just want to say it's

0:06:04.640 --> 0:06:08.839
<v Speaker 1>pretty darn hypocritical to hear Russian officials declare Meta a

0:06:08.839 --> 0:06:13.840
<v Speaker 1>platform that facilitates and encourages extremism, because well, we all

0:06:13.880 --> 0:06:17.240
<v Speaker 1>know that Russian operatives have long been at work leveraging

0:06:17.279 --> 0:06:21.400
<v Speaker 1>social networking platforms in general and Facebook in particular in

0:06:21.440 --> 0:06:25.719
<v Speaker 1>an effort to push radical extremist ideologies in other countries

0:06:25.760 --> 0:06:31.200
<v Speaker 1>and to disrupt their, you know, political processes, particularly here

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:34.279
<v Speaker 1>in the United States. So yeah, Meta is kind of

0:06:34.360 --> 0:06:38.440
<v Speaker 1>awful in that way, but it always has been in

0:06:38.520 --> 0:06:42.240
<v Speaker 1>Russia has depended upon it in the past, So you know,

0:06:42.960 --> 0:06:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I guess, I guess there are no good guys in

0:06:45.880 --> 0:06:49.920
<v Speaker 1>that particular scenario. Now, one thing that Meta is doing

0:06:50.360 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 1>that arguably isn't terrible is it is offering to educate

0:06:55.200 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 1>influencers and politicians in Australia in advance of an upcome

0:07:00.160 --> 0:07:03.040
<v Speaker 1>election this May, and the goal is to help folks

0:07:03.120 --> 0:07:07.640
<v Speaker 1>stop the spread of misinformation on social networking platforms, which

0:07:07.720 --> 0:07:10.520
<v Speaker 1>is a nice change of pace really, seeing as how

0:07:10.640 --> 0:07:15.760
<v Speaker 1>misinformation can very quickly spread online, going straight through influential

0:07:15.760 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 1>people and then going out to the rest of us.

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:23.680
<v Speaker 1>So these influencers and politicians are are going through kind

0:07:23.680 --> 0:07:27.480
<v Speaker 1>of a boot camp training session on how to spot

0:07:27.560 --> 0:07:30.800
<v Speaker 1>and prevent misinformation. And this is on top of other

0:07:30.880 --> 0:07:34.120
<v Speaker 1>measures designed to scrub the tarnish off of Facebook when

0:07:34.120 --> 0:07:38.240
<v Speaker 1>it comes to issues like potential election interference. The company

0:07:38.280 --> 0:07:41.600
<v Speaker 1>also said it will require full disclosure of the names

0:07:41.640 --> 0:07:45.240
<v Speaker 1>of organizations and folks who pay to run political advertising

0:07:45.280 --> 0:07:49.600
<v Speaker 1>on the platform in Australia, so there won't be any

0:07:49.800 --> 0:07:53.920
<v Speaker 1>allowance for like mystery money ads being run on there.

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:57.720
<v Speaker 1>They will all have to be you know, have some

0:07:57.840 --> 0:08:02.280
<v Speaker 1>name there to hold accountability for those ads. Candidates in

0:08:02.440 --> 0:08:06.160
<v Speaker 1>the election will be required to activate two factor authentication

0:08:06.320 --> 0:08:09.320
<v Speaker 1>in order to avoid the possibility of someone hacking a

0:08:09.400 --> 0:08:13.880
<v Speaker 1>candidates profile or page. Also removes that whole plausible deniability

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:17.920
<v Speaker 1>thing where maybe someone posts something that ends up blowing

0:08:18.000 --> 0:08:20.000
<v Speaker 1>up in their face that they can't say, oh, I

0:08:20.080 --> 0:08:24.280
<v Speaker 1>was hacked if they're they've got like two factor authentication active.

0:08:24.720 --> 0:08:28.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, technically, if you're really determined hacker and you

0:08:28.400 --> 0:08:31.360
<v Speaker 1>get hold of someone's phone, two factor authentication is still

0:08:31.400 --> 0:08:35.559
<v Speaker 1>something you could crack, but it's less likely. Company representatives

0:08:35.559 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>say that Meta isn't taking any political side itself, so

0:08:38.880 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 1>it's not favoring one side over the other. Instead, it's

0:08:42.080 --> 0:08:44.360
<v Speaker 1>opening up these tools for all to use in an

0:08:44.400 --> 0:08:48.240
<v Speaker 1>effort to assure a fair process. Hopefully we'll see similar

0:08:48.280 --> 0:08:52.439
<v Speaker 1>strategies deployed around the world. Due to pressure from Google.

0:08:52.840 --> 0:08:59.400
<v Speaker 1>The Android app Advanced has shut down. You might not

0:08:59.600 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 1>know what Vanced is. You might be wondering what the

0:09:02.760 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 1>heck I'm talking about. I mean I I certainly didn't

0:09:05.800 --> 0:09:09.800
<v Speaker 1>know what it was before today, But Vanced v A

0:09:10.000 --> 0:09:13.280
<v Speaker 1>n C E D was an app that let users

0:09:13.400 --> 0:09:17.840
<v Speaker 1>view YouTube videos without all those ads and without having

0:09:17.880 --> 0:09:21.040
<v Speaker 1>to subscribe to YouTube to do it, so you could

0:09:21.040 --> 0:09:25.600
<v Speaker 1>actually bypass ads using the Vanced app. Google sent Vanced

0:09:25.600 --> 0:09:28.560
<v Speaker 1>a cease and desist letter and the company announced it

0:09:28.600 --> 0:09:32.720
<v Speaker 1>would shut down operations. So the current Vanced app will

0:09:32.760 --> 0:09:36.080
<v Speaker 1>continue to work for the time being, at least for

0:09:36.120 --> 0:09:38.280
<v Speaker 1>those who have already installed it. So it's not like

0:09:39.040 --> 0:09:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Google went into everyone's phones and wiped the app. Clear,

0:09:42.960 --> 0:09:46.360
<v Speaker 1>It's still on phones. However, it's just a matter of

0:09:46.400 --> 0:09:50.520
<v Speaker 1>time before, you know, changes in operating systems and stuff

0:09:50.679 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 1>eventually render that app inoperable, Like eventually they were going

0:09:54.320 --> 0:09:57.840
<v Speaker 1>to be incompatibilities and the app just won't work anymore.

0:09:58.000 --> 0:10:00.560
<v Speaker 1>But for the time being, it still works. And on

0:10:00.600 --> 0:10:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the one hand, I totally get it. I mean, YouTube,

0:10:03.280 --> 0:10:06.360
<v Speaker 1>when you really boil it down, is an advertising platform,

0:10:06.640 --> 0:10:10.640
<v Speaker 1>just like Google Search is really an advertising platform. Facebook

0:10:10.840 --> 0:10:15.400
<v Speaker 1>is really an advertising platform, and when you offer folks

0:10:15.559 --> 0:10:19.360
<v Speaker 1>away around advertising and one that does not involve paying

0:10:19.360 --> 0:10:23.600
<v Speaker 1>into a subscription instead. That kind of undermines the whole business.

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:26.200
<v Speaker 1>But on the other hand, it does sound like Vanced

0:10:26.240 --> 0:10:29.520
<v Speaker 1>offered up a lot of features that YouTube just doesn't include,

0:10:29.559 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 1>but sounded kind of nifty, like it would be really

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:35.880
<v Speaker 1>neat to see, you know, if YouTube had instead acquired

0:10:35.880 --> 0:10:39.720
<v Speaker 1>Advanced and then incorporated some of those features, that would

0:10:39.720 --> 0:10:43.040
<v Speaker 1>have been neat. And I wonder if Google would have

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:46.360
<v Speaker 1>come after Advanced if the app had not allowed users

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:51.680
<v Speaker 1>to bypass ads. Uh maybe or maybe not. Google has

0:10:51.720 --> 0:10:54.560
<v Speaker 1>been cracking down on apps and services that tap into

0:10:55.360 --> 0:10:58.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, Google databases and libraries like YouTube's library of

0:10:58.840 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 1>content without you know, getting actual permission to be able

0:11:01.920 --> 0:11:06.079
<v Speaker 1>to do that, And uh yeah, it's entirely possible that

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:08.680
<v Speaker 1>Google still would have come after Vanced even without the

0:11:08.760 --> 0:11:13.080
<v Speaker 1>add thing. But anyway, farewell, Vanced, I never knew. Ye.

0:11:14.160 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 1>We have more news to cover, but first, let's take

0:11:16.920 --> 0:11:27.440
<v Speaker 1>a quick break. A restaurant group in Florida has filed

0:11:27.440 --> 0:11:31.600
<v Speaker 1>a lawsuit against Google, alleging that the company has circumvented

0:11:31.720 --> 0:11:35.280
<v Speaker 1>restaurants with an order online option that more often than

0:11:35.360 --> 0:11:40.240
<v Speaker 1>not takes users to food delivery services rather than to

0:11:40.360 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 1>the restaurants owned and operated site. And here's where we

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:47.959
<v Speaker 1>get into some of the big issues with food delivery services,

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 1>and one of those is that restaurants often see little

0:11:51.480 --> 0:11:55.760
<v Speaker 1>if any profit when working with these food delivery services

0:11:56.040 --> 0:11:59.640
<v Speaker 1>because the services take a hefty cut of any order,

0:12:00.200 --> 0:12:03.559
<v Speaker 1>up to like thirty of the order in some cases,

0:12:04.000 --> 0:12:08.080
<v Speaker 1>and so a lot of restaurants would obviously much preferred

0:12:08.120 --> 0:12:10.720
<v Speaker 1>if you would just order directly from them and not

0:12:11.000 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 1>use these delivery services. The problem is most restaurants can't

0:12:15.240 --> 0:12:19.719
<v Speaker 1>afford to employ a fleet of delivery drivers, so this

0:12:19.800 --> 0:12:24.320
<v Speaker 1>limits customers to either dining in at those restaurants or

0:12:24.480 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>going with take out, maybe even curbside pickup options, but

0:12:28.240 --> 0:12:31.640
<v Speaker 1>obviously that's not as convenient or you know, in the

0:12:31.679 --> 0:12:34.200
<v Speaker 1>case of areas that might have a high COVID out break,

0:12:34.760 --> 0:12:37.720
<v Speaker 1>it might not be particularly safe, particularly when we're talking

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:41.200
<v Speaker 1>about dining in. So if these allegations are true, and

0:12:41.240 --> 0:12:44.800
<v Speaker 1>if Google has been steering visitors to food delivery services

0:12:44.880 --> 0:12:49.040
<v Speaker 1>and away from the restaurants, clearly that could really hurt

0:12:49.120 --> 0:12:53.160
<v Speaker 1>the restaurant in question. Google, however, disputes the claims and

0:12:53.240 --> 0:12:56.320
<v Speaker 1>says that it works with restaurants to incorporate in house

0:12:56.480 --> 0:13:01.240
<v Speaker 1>online ordering systems so that the restaurants system peers alongside

0:13:01.360 --> 0:13:05.840
<v Speaker 1>all the food delivery services. Google also said that clicking

0:13:05.960 --> 0:13:09.160
<v Speaker 1>on the online order option really just takes users to

0:13:09.200 --> 0:13:11.800
<v Speaker 1>a page where they can choose among the various online

0:13:11.880 --> 0:13:16.560
<v Speaker 1>ordering services, which would presumably also include the restaurant's own

0:13:16.640 --> 0:13:19.440
<v Speaker 1>options if it has one. Now, this gets a little

0:13:19.440 --> 0:13:22.200
<v Speaker 1>bit more complicated because a lot of restaurants will rely

0:13:22.440 --> 0:13:27.120
<v Speaker 1>on third party companies to handle online orders. And that's understandable.

0:13:27.120 --> 0:13:29.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's hard enough just running a restaurant without

0:13:29.640 --> 0:13:34.240
<v Speaker 1>also handling, you know, an online portal to your ordering system.

0:13:34.280 --> 0:13:38.320
<v Speaker 1>So a lot of restaurants will end up partnering with

0:13:38.400 --> 0:13:41.200
<v Speaker 1>a third party company that will handle the online order part.

0:13:41.840 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 1>But those services might show up as something unfamiliar to

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:47.800
<v Speaker 1>visitors when they're looking to order a meal. Right instead

0:13:47.800 --> 0:13:51.559
<v Speaker 1>of it's saying, you know, you know, Joe's restaurant, it

0:13:51.720 --> 0:13:55.120
<v Speaker 1>might have the name of the third party service that

0:13:55.280 --> 0:13:57.360
<v Speaker 1>handles the online orders, and you might think, well, I

0:13:57.400 --> 0:14:01.280
<v Speaker 1>don't even know what that is, and you skip it. Anyway.

0:14:01.480 --> 0:14:04.400
<v Speaker 1>The Restaurant Group claims that Google's services amount to a

0:14:04.520 --> 0:14:08.160
<v Speaker 1>bait and switch that harms restaurants, and Google meanwhile saying

0:14:08.200 --> 0:14:11.600
<v Speaker 1>it's taking steps to make sure that restaurants are fairly represented.

0:14:12.240 --> 0:14:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Uh my big takeaway pun intended was that if there

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:18.800
<v Speaker 1>is an option to order directly from a restaurant, it's

0:14:18.840 --> 0:14:21.560
<v Speaker 1>probably best to do that if you want the restaurant

0:14:21.560 --> 0:14:24.600
<v Speaker 1>to you know, stick around, and in many cases it

0:14:24.600 --> 0:14:28.040
<v Speaker 1>will likely be cheaper than ordering through a delivery service

0:14:28.120 --> 0:14:31.240
<v Speaker 1>as well. Uh, this is a tough one. I mean,

0:14:31.280 --> 0:14:34.880
<v Speaker 1>there's so much going on here because you also you

0:14:34.880 --> 0:14:37.400
<v Speaker 1>have to feel for the gig economy workers who are

0:14:37.400 --> 0:14:40.880
<v Speaker 1>actually doing the driving and delivering. You know, it's not

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:43.680
<v Speaker 1>their fault that the service they work for is taking

0:14:43.720 --> 0:14:47.040
<v Speaker 1>this big chunk out of the orders that are going

0:14:47.040 --> 0:14:53.120
<v Speaker 1>to restaurants. So yeah, complicated stuff. Meanwhile, Google employees are

0:14:53.200 --> 0:14:58.000
<v Speaker 1>reportedly unhappy with the company. That's according to an employee

0:14:58.000 --> 0:15:01.480
<v Speaker 1>survey that Google conducts every year, and it indicates that

0:15:02.240 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 1>more employees than last year feel they aren't being compensated

0:15:05.640 --> 0:15:09.280
<v Speaker 1>properly for their jobs. The company also scored poorly when

0:15:09.280 --> 0:15:11.760
<v Speaker 1>it came to employees views on how well the company

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:16.160
<v Speaker 1>executes its mission. Now, the mission itself and the company's

0:15:16.200 --> 0:15:20.480
<v Speaker 1>core values got very high marks. Employees feel good about those,

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:23.000
<v Speaker 1>So this kind of sounds to me like a lot

0:15:23.040 --> 0:15:26.720
<v Speaker 1>of Google employees like the talk, but they feel like

0:15:26.800 --> 0:15:30.280
<v Speaker 1>the walk just ain't measuring up. This also comes at

0:15:30.280 --> 0:15:32.880
<v Speaker 1>a time when the company is moving to bring employees

0:15:32.920 --> 0:15:35.960
<v Speaker 1>back into the office for at least three days a week,

0:15:36.600 --> 0:15:40.160
<v Speaker 1>and it's a tough message to Google management, right, I mean,

0:15:41.040 --> 0:15:43.840
<v Speaker 1>retaining employees has become a bit of a challenge ever

0:15:43.920 --> 0:15:47.160
<v Speaker 1>since the pandemic hit. I'm sure we've all heard about

0:15:47.200 --> 0:15:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the Great Retirement, in which there's this trend of folks

0:15:51.120 --> 0:15:53.880
<v Speaker 1>who are choosing to resign and then live off savings

0:15:54.000 --> 0:15:57.800
<v Speaker 1>rather than continue to work, and tech companies have had

0:15:57.840 --> 0:16:01.120
<v Speaker 1>to offer more competitive pack pages in an effort to

0:16:01.160 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>attract and keep talent because there's a smaller talent pool

0:16:05.920 --> 0:16:09.400
<v Speaker 1>and it's easy to for them to jump ship. It's

0:16:09.440 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 1>actually starting to remind me a bit of the heyday

0:16:11.560 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 1>of the dot com era, where you would see talent

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:18.160
<v Speaker 1>going from company to company just following the best compensation

0:16:18.240 --> 0:16:21.720
<v Speaker 1>or benefits packages, and those days, those were usually tied

0:16:21.760 --> 0:16:24.680
<v Speaker 1>to stocks, which ultimately proved to be a huge mistake

0:16:24.800 --> 0:16:27.920
<v Speaker 1>because tons of dot com companies went under after the

0:16:27.920 --> 0:16:31.880
<v Speaker 1>bubble burst and those stocks became worthless. But according to CNBC,

0:16:32.720 --> 0:16:35.880
<v Speaker 1>more than half of Google employees surveyed felt that their

0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:41.080
<v Speaker 1>compensation wasn't competitive. At Google, slightly more than half of

0:16:41.120 --> 0:16:45.359
<v Speaker 1>all employees still called the compensation quote fair and equitable

0:16:45.560 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 1>end quote. So I'm guessing some employees are miffed that

0:16:49.480 --> 0:16:53.480
<v Speaker 1>various executives and leaders at Google recently received pay raises

0:16:53.520 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 1>and bonuses, and the company itself is making serious bank

0:16:57.360 --> 0:17:00.800
<v Speaker 1>its revenue is through the roof right, and and yet

0:17:00.840 --> 0:17:04.600
<v Speaker 1>the head of compensation, Frank Wagner, said last December that

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:07.080
<v Speaker 1>Google would not be issuing a blanket raise to help

0:17:07.240 --> 0:17:12.080
<v Speaker 1>employees address issues with inflation. Not a great look, particularly

0:17:12.119 --> 0:17:13.879
<v Speaker 1>as we appear to be at a turning point in

0:17:13.920 --> 0:17:18.120
<v Speaker 1>America where stuff like employee organization and unions and group

0:17:18.160 --> 0:17:22.800
<v Speaker 1>negotiations are really starting to gain traction switching gears. The

0:17:22.920 --> 0:17:26.240
<v Speaker 1>Israeli government confirmed reports recently that it was the target

0:17:26.320 --> 0:17:30.359
<v Speaker 1>of a massive distributed denial of service or di DOS attack.

0:17:31.400 --> 0:17:34.040
<v Speaker 1>In case you're not familiar with that term, it refers

0:17:34.080 --> 0:17:36.960
<v Speaker 1>to a kind of attack where hackers direct a bunch

0:17:37.000 --> 0:17:40.680
<v Speaker 1>of computers. I mean, we're potentially talking thousands or even

0:17:40.760 --> 0:17:44.320
<v Speaker 1>tens of thousands of computers to send messages to a

0:17:44.400 --> 0:17:48.480
<v Speaker 1>target or selection of targets in an attempt to overwhelm

0:17:48.520 --> 0:17:52.320
<v Speaker 1>those targets and cause them to underperform or even crash.

0:17:52.480 --> 0:17:56.080
<v Speaker 1>So the analogy I like to use is imagine that

0:17:56.359 --> 0:17:59.520
<v Speaker 1>you are absolutely required to answer your doorbell. If your

0:17:59.560 --> 0:18:02.440
<v Speaker 1>doorbell rings, you have no choice. You have to answer it.

0:18:03.200 --> 0:18:05.679
<v Speaker 1>But you also have to do your taxes, So you

0:18:05.720 --> 0:18:08.800
<v Speaker 1>sit down, you start doing your taxes. The doorbell rings,

0:18:08.840 --> 0:18:11.000
<v Speaker 1>so you stop your work. You head on over to

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:13.880
<v Speaker 1>the door and you open it, but there's no one there,

0:18:14.280 --> 0:18:16.359
<v Speaker 1>so you close the door, you turn around, you start

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:18.640
<v Speaker 1>walking back so you can get back to doing your taxes,

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:21.399
<v Speaker 1>and the doorbell rings again, so you turn back around

0:18:21.520 --> 0:18:23.320
<v Speaker 1>and you have to go to the door and open

0:18:23.359 --> 0:18:25.719
<v Speaker 1>it and there's still no one there. Now repeat that

0:18:25.840 --> 0:18:27.880
<v Speaker 1>millions of times, and you see how you would never

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:31.239
<v Speaker 1>get any work done well. Adidas attack is kind of

0:18:31.280 --> 0:18:34.440
<v Speaker 1>doing the same thing, only with electronic messages rather than

0:18:34.720 --> 0:18:38.520
<v Speaker 1>a ding dong ditch approach. While there is no confirmation

0:18:38.560 --> 0:18:41.560
<v Speaker 1>as of yet about who is behind the attack, the

0:18:41.600 --> 0:18:45.320
<v Speaker 1>general suspicion falls on Iranian cyber Crime Group. This is

0:18:45.359 --> 0:18:50.359
<v Speaker 1>according to the Jerusalem Post. The attack affected numerous Israeli

0:18:50.440 --> 0:18:53.520
<v Speaker 1>government websites as well as some media outlets in Israel,

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:56.760
<v Speaker 1>and the Israeli government has called for a state of

0:18:56.800 --> 0:19:00.120
<v Speaker 1>emergency and launched an investigation to determine if the attack

0:19:00.520 --> 0:19:04.480
<v Speaker 1>went beyond just a denial of service attack and is

0:19:04.640 --> 0:19:07.919
<v Speaker 1>looking to see if perhaps the hackers access to any

0:19:08.000 --> 0:19:12.439
<v Speaker 1>you know data or stoleny data as well. Tesla's senior

0:19:12.480 --> 0:19:16.000
<v Speaker 1>directory of public Policy, Rowan Patel, sent a letter to

0:19:16.160 --> 0:19:20.240
<v Speaker 1>US Senators Ed Markey and Richard Blumenthal earlier this month.

0:19:20.600 --> 0:19:24.080
<v Speaker 1>This was in response to inquiries that these senators had

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:29.600
<v Speaker 1>previously made regarding quote significant concerns end quote about Tesla's

0:19:29.640 --> 0:19:33.960
<v Speaker 1>autopilot and full service Drive or f s D features. Now,

0:19:34.000 --> 0:19:35.919
<v Speaker 1>if you've been listening to tech stuff for a while,

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 1>you have undoubtedly heard me complain about the naming conventions

0:19:40.640 --> 0:19:43.400
<v Speaker 1>that Tesla uses, because I feel they give a false

0:19:43.400 --> 0:19:48.479
<v Speaker 1>expectation about what they're those features can do, and to me,

0:19:48.520 --> 0:19:51.840
<v Speaker 1>it does really feel like a bait and switch. I mean,

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:55.199
<v Speaker 1>I think if you call it full self driving, that

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:58.639
<v Speaker 1>kind of suggests that the car can fully drive itself.

0:19:58.680 --> 0:20:01.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I don't think I'm being unreasonable about that,

0:20:02.000 --> 0:20:05.280
<v Speaker 1>But according to Patel, that's not really the intent. Because

0:20:05.480 --> 0:20:09.520
<v Speaker 1>Patel actually refers to both autopilot and FSD as level

0:20:09.680 --> 0:20:13.959
<v Speaker 1>two on the scale of autonomy. So the autonomy scale

0:20:14.640 --> 0:20:17.960
<v Speaker 1>goes from zero to five. Zero is a vehicle that

0:20:18.000 --> 0:20:21.959
<v Speaker 1>has no autonomous features whatsoever. Five would be a vehicle

0:20:22.000 --> 0:20:25.639
<v Speaker 1>that is fully autonomous and capable of operating in any

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:29.560
<v Speaker 1>environment or in any situation where a human driver could

0:20:29.560 --> 0:20:32.720
<v Speaker 1>also operate. So level two, as you might imagine, is

0:20:33.000 --> 0:20:36.399
<v Speaker 1>fairly low down on that scale, and again it raises

0:20:36.400 --> 0:20:40.160
<v Speaker 1>the question, if it's just leveled two, why call it

0:20:40.280 --> 0:20:45.199
<v Speaker 1>full self driving anyway. Patel's letters stated that these modes

0:20:45.280 --> 0:20:50.240
<v Speaker 1>provide definitive safety benefits and cited metrics that appear to

0:20:50.280 --> 0:20:53.600
<v Speaker 1>show that Tesla drivers who are using these types of

0:20:54.040 --> 0:20:57.240
<v Speaker 1>features are far less likely to get into accidents than

0:20:57.480 --> 0:21:01.280
<v Speaker 1>other drivers who are driving other types of vehicles. Critics

0:21:01.320 --> 0:21:05.040
<v Speaker 1>then complained that Tesla was using different data sets to

0:21:05.560 --> 0:21:09.120
<v Speaker 1>show this, that the data for other drivers included all

0:21:09.119 --> 0:21:13.320
<v Speaker 1>sorts of situations, from driving on neighborhood streets to cruising

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:16.640
<v Speaker 1>on highways, while Tesla was focusing really on highway operation

0:21:16.680 --> 0:21:21.120
<v Speaker 1>because that's where you can enable Autopilot and FSD. In addition,

0:21:21.440 --> 0:21:25.040
<v Speaker 1>the Senators have reportedly not been terribly impressed with the letter,

0:21:25.119 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 1>saying that Tesla is really just deflecting, so it doesn't

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:32.399
<v Speaker 1>seem like they are they are buying into Tesla's line.

0:21:33.320 --> 0:21:36.280
<v Speaker 1>We've got a few more stories, but first, let's take

0:21:36.320 --> 0:21:45.880
<v Speaker 1>a quick break. Have you ever looked at your bill

0:21:46.280 --> 0:21:50.520
<v Speaker 1>from your Internet service provider and thought that's weird. Sure

0:21:50.520 --> 0:21:53.800
<v Speaker 1>are a lot of extra fees built into this thing. Well,

0:21:53.880 --> 0:21:57.600
<v Speaker 1>Carl Bode recently wrote an article for tech Dirt titled

0:21:58.119 --> 0:22:01.600
<v Speaker 1>big I s p s avoided twenty twenty law banning

0:22:01.600 --> 0:22:06.399
<v Speaker 1>predatory modem rental fees by simply calling them something else.

0:22:07.320 --> 0:22:10.560
<v Speaker 1>So that headline pretty much kind of spells out the story.

0:22:10.640 --> 0:22:13.800
<v Speaker 1>So Bode rights about I s P companies. They got

0:22:13.800 --> 0:22:17.600
<v Speaker 1>in trouble because they were charging an equipment rental fee

0:22:17.640 --> 0:22:20.439
<v Speaker 1>to customers who you know, actually owned the equipment they

0:22:20.440 --> 0:22:23.800
<v Speaker 1>were using. They weren't actually renting anything from the I

0:22:24.000 --> 0:22:26.840
<v Speaker 1>s p s. So it's pretty standard practice here in

0:22:26.840 --> 0:22:29.160
<v Speaker 1>the United States for I s p s to lump

0:22:29.200 --> 0:22:34.480
<v Speaker 1>in a modem slash router with your service, and for

0:22:34.720 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>that the customer pays a rental fee. On a monthly basis,

0:22:39.720 --> 0:22:44.240
<v Speaker 1>but customers can actually use their own modem and router

0:22:44.800 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 1>and register that with their I s P. I mean,

0:22:47.280 --> 0:22:50.280
<v Speaker 1>you can do that, you don't have to use the

0:22:50.320 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 1>one provided by the the I s P itself. But

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:56.720
<v Speaker 1>then they found many of them that they were still

0:22:56.760 --> 0:22:59.560
<v Speaker 1>being charged a rental fee, and being charged to rent

0:22:59.640 --> 0:23:02.359
<v Speaker 1>something that you're not renting is you know, not legal.

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:05.480
<v Speaker 1>And Congress finally kind of pushed back on I s

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:09.119
<v Speaker 1>p s about it by passing a law that expressly

0:23:09.920 --> 0:23:13.399
<v Speaker 1>forbid that kind of practice. But then, as Boat explains,

0:23:13.680 --> 0:23:15.240
<v Speaker 1>the I s p s found kind of a way

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:19.560
<v Speaker 1>to recontextualize those fees and pump them back into bills.

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:24.359
<v Speaker 1>They just called them other stuff. And Bod's point is

0:23:24.400 --> 0:23:27.399
<v Speaker 1>that this approach lets I s p s advertise a

0:23:27.560 --> 0:23:32.760
<v Speaker 1>lower rate because the base rate that they're charging that

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:36.040
<v Speaker 1>can be really low and it can be very steady,

0:23:36.119 --> 0:23:38.640
<v Speaker 1>so they can say, like, we we charge the lowest

0:23:38.720 --> 0:23:42.960
<v Speaker 1>rates you you have a base rate that is really competitive. However,

0:23:43.160 --> 0:23:45.480
<v Speaker 1>then they get all these hidden fees that they throw

0:23:45.560 --> 0:23:49.920
<v Speaker 1>in that boost the expense, and that's when your bill

0:23:49.960 --> 0:23:52.960
<v Speaker 1>starts going up and up and up, and often these

0:23:53.000 --> 0:23:56.200
<v Speaker 1>mysterious vs don't seem to, you know, correlate with anything

0:23:56.240 --> 0:23:59.040
<v Speaker 1>other than lining the pockets of I s P shareholders

0:23:59.040 --> 0:24:03.480
<v Speaker 1>and executives. Anyway, bodes piece is well worth a read.

0:24:03.720 --> 0:24:06.560
<v Speaker 1>He gets pretty salty about it in the article, but

0:24:06.640 --> 0:24:09.520
<v Speaker 1>it can't exactly blame him if you want to read

0:24:09.560 --> 0:24:12.639
<v Speaker 1>it again. That is on tech Dirt, and the article

0:24:12.760 --> 0:24:16.840
<v Speaker 1>is called big I s P s avoided law banning

0:24:16.840 --> 0:24:20.760
<v Speaker 1>predatory modem rental fees by simply calling them something else.

0:24:21.240 --> 0:24:24.120
<v Speaker 1>Check it out now. It's not often that my tech

0:24:24.200 --> 0:24:27.399
<v Speaker 1>news segment includes a bit about Snoop Dogg. Uh. Not

0:24:27.520 --> 0:24:30.720
<v Speaker 1>too long ago, Snoop Dogg acquired the famous death Row

0:24:30.800 --> 0:24:34.200
<v Speaker 1>Records music label, which published music from legends like Dr

0:24:34.280 --> 0:24:37.159
<v Speaker 1>Dre and Tupac Shakur and of course the d O

0:24:37.280 --> 0:24:40.840
<v Speaker 1>double G himself. But now fans are becoming frustrated because

0:24:41.080 --> 0:24:44.120
<v Speaker 1>a lot of music from many of death Rows artists

0:24:44.400 --> 0:24:48.399
<v Speaker 1>has been disappearing from various streaming services like Spotify and

0:24:48.480 --> 0:24:52.000
<v Speaker 1>Apple Music. And this, paired with Snoop's announcement that death

0:24:52.080 --> 0:24:54.280
<v Speaker 1>Row will be an n f T label, has a

0:24:54.280 --> 0:24:57.439
<v Speaker 1>lot of folks ticked off in f T s. If

0:24:57.440 --> 0:25:01.240
<v Speaker 1>you recall that stands for non fungible tokens. Essentially, they

0:25:01.280 --> 0:25:05.720
<v Speaker 1>represent ownership of a piece of digital media or digital

0:25:05.880 --> 0:25:08.239
<v Speaker 1>art Snoop Dogg has said that death Row is going

0:25:08.280 --> 0:25:10.720
<v Speaker 1>to be a quote the first major in the metaverse

0:25:10.880 --> 0:25:15.160
<v Speaker 1>end quote. I I assume he means major music label here.

0:25:15.680 --> 0:25:18.399
<v Speaker 1>But there's been a pretty serious backlash against n f

0:25:18.440 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 1>t s from all but a core group of faithful followers,

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:25.199
<v Speaker 1>and generally speaking, people are not super happy when they

0:25:25.240 --> 0:25:27.600
<v Speaker 1>lose access to stuff that they used to be able

0:25:27.600 --> 0:25:32.439
<v Speaker 1>to get to, and this has led to quite a

0:25:32.440 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 1>few folks to go on to Twitter and lament that

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:37.359
<v Speaker 1>they will have to go back to the Stone Age

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:40.760
<v Speaker 1>and you know, listen to their old CD collection. Now

0:25:40.760 --> 0:25:43.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm being a little bit facetious here, but you know,

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:46.359
<v Speaker 1>streaming music is also way more convenient than relying on

0:25:46.400 --> 0:25:49.439
<v Speaker 1>physical media because you can listen to it anywhere as

0:25:49.480 --> 0:25:52.240
<v Speaker 1>long as you have an Internet connection. You don't have

0:25:52.320 --> 0:25:55.720
<v Speaker 1>to carry around, you know, a physical player of some sort.

0:25:55.800 --> 0:25:58.480
<v Speaker 1>You just need you know, a connected device like a phone.

0:25:59.119 --> 0:26:03.560
<v Speaker 1>So I do admit like losing access to streaming stuff

0:26:03.880 --> 0:26:06.840
<v Speaker 1>is a bit of a kick in the teeth. Interestingly,

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:14.280
<v Speaker 1>the Verge reports that CD sales actually increased in UM

0:26:14.320 --> 0:26:17.360
<v Speaker 1>compared to that actually marks the first time we've seen

0:26:17.440 --> 0:26:22.560
<v Speaker 1>CD sales go up since two thousand four. Since two

0:26:22.560 --> 0:26:28.480
<v Speaker 1>thousand four, every single year sales declined until now. That's

0:26:28.520 --> 0:26:31.320
<v Speaker 1>not to say that CDs are back baby, but rather

0:26:31.560 --> 0:26:33.639
<v Speaker 1>the steady decline in sales had a little bit of

0:26:33.640 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 1>a bump last year. Now. Perhaps part of that reason

0:26:36.800 --> 0:26:38.760
<v Speaker 1>is because people want to make sure they can listen

0:26:38.760 --> 0:26:41.040
<v Speaker 1>to music and they don't have to worry if their

0:26:41.040 --> 0:26:45.280
<v Speaker 1>favorite artist happens to disappear from a streaming service. Maybe

0:26:45.320 --> 0:26:46.760
<v Speaker 1>part of it is that a lot of us were

0:26:46.800 --> 0:26:49.159
<v Speaker 1>isolating at home, so it wasn't as important to us

0:26:49.160 --> 0:26:52.640
<v Speaker 1>that we have music available via streaming, you know, and

0:26:52.680 --> 0:26:56.280
<v Speaker 1>so we weren't going anywhere we could just listen to

0:26:56.359 --> 0:26:59.120
<v Speaker 1>c d s instead. It's not like it was that inconvenient.

0:26:59.600 --> 0:27:01.879
<v Speaker 1>And then or, of course, is the appeal of owning

0:27:01.880 --> 0:27:05.439
<v Speaker 1>a physical thing and not just access to something. I

0:27:05.480 --> 0:27:07.600
<v Speaker 1>definitely feel like that's a big part of the attraction

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:10.080
<v Speaker 1>to Vinyl UM. I know there are a lot of

0:27:10.359 --> 0:27:14.159
<v Speaker 1>audio files out there who just swear that Vinyl provides

0:27:14.280 --> 0:27:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the superior experience. I'm not entirely sold on that, but

0:27:18.480 --> 0:27:21.879
<v Speaker 1>I do collect Vinyl I casually collected. I have to

0:27:21.880 --> 0:27:24.280
<v Speaker 1>stress it's very casual because I just don't have the

0:27:24.359 --> 0:27:26.280
<v Speaker 1>room for a big collection. And also I can stop

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:29.399
<v Speaker 1>at any time, just shut up. But um yeah, I

0:27:29.400 --> 0:27:30.919
<v Speaker 1>think that that's a big part of it, is that

0:27:31.000 --> 0:27:35.159
<v Speaker 1>owning something physical and not just owning access or having

0:27:35.240 --> 0:27:40.040
<v Speaker 1>the opportunity to access something. Whether all this increase you know,

0:27:40.440 --> 0:27:43.359
<v Speaker 1>of sales marks a general reverse of the trend or

0:27:43.400 --> 0:27:46.199
<v Speaker 1>not remains to be seen. I think it's probably just

0:27:46.240 --> 0:27:49.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bump and we'll see CD sales continue to

0:27:49.560 --> 0:27:53.560
<v Speaker 1>decline after this year. But then if more music labels

0:27:53.560 --> 0:27:56.200
<v Speaker 1>follow Death Rows example and go the n f T route,

0:27:56.720 --> 0:28:00.119
<v Speaker 1>we can actually see CD sales take off instead. I

0:28:00.119 --> 0:28:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I know that, you know, I'd be more inclined to

0:28:02.560 --> 0:28:06.119
<v Speaker 1>go the c D route rather than this whole n

0:28:06.160 --> 0:28:10.320
<v Speaker 1>f T approach. Finally, over in Europe, the EU Parliament

0:28:10.359 --> 0:28:13.440
<v Speaker 1>has drafted a legislation that, if adopted, will require some

0:28:13.480 --> 0:28:18.560
<v Speaker 1>pretty big changes for major companies like Apple. Namely, the

0:28:18.640 --> 0:28:22.879
<v Speaker 1>legislation focuses on batteries, and as the EU pushes towards

0:28:22.880 --> 0:28:27.000
<v Speaker 1>a carbon neutral or perhaps even carbon negative future, it's

0:28:27.000 --> 0:28:29.879
<v Speaker 1>clear that to get there will require a heavy reliance

0:28:30.000 --> 0:28:33.880
<v Speaker 1>on batteries. However, the EU has also acknowledged that batteries

0:28:33.920 --> 0:28:37.920
<v Speaker 1>come with their own problems, and so this legislation aims

0:28:37.960 --> 0:28:41.000
<v Speaker 1>to do tons of stuff, from requiring companies to provide

0:28:41.040 --> 0:28:46.320
<v Speaker 1>evidence of carbon footprint involved in producing batteries, to practicing

0:28:46.400 --> 0:28:49.479
<v Speaker 1>due diligence to make sure that the sourcing, processing and

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:53.240
<v Speaker 1>trading of materials used in producing batteries is done in

0:28:53.280 --> 0:28:56.800
<v Speaker 1>an ethical and responsible way. This is a really big

0:28:56.840 --> 0:28:59.080
<v Speaker 1>deal because a lot of those materials come from countries

0:28:59.560 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 1>that have of at the very least a spotty record

0:29:02.880 --> 0:29:05.760
<v Speaker 1>on stuff like human rights. But as for that bit

0:29:05.760 --> 0:29:08.360
<v Speaker 1>about how it would really affect companies like Apple, well,

0:29:08.400 --> 0:29:11.600
<v Speaker 1>part of the legislation says that companies will have to

0:29:11.680 --> 0:29:17.360
<v Speaker 1>make batteries and their products easily removable and replaceable. Apple,

0:29:17.720 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 1>like a lot of tech companies, doesn't tend to do that. Um.

0:29:22.680 --> 0:29:26.680
<v Speaker 1>In fact, when you look at handsets, tablets, and even laptops,

0:29:27.120 --> 0:29:31.760
<v Speaker 1>a lot of manufacturers do not make the batteries easily removable.

0:29:31.800 --> 0:29:34.320
<v Speaker 1>I love it when a laptop has a battery that

0:29:34.360 --> 0:29:38.360
<v Speaker 1>you can easily remove and potentially replace. I think that's great. Um.

0:29:38.400 --> 0:29:40.400
<v Speaker 1>I have a laptop that I use all the time

0:29:40.600 --> 0:29:42.680
<v Speaker 1>that doesn't do that. I actually looked up how to

0:29:42.760 --> 0:29:48.120
<v Speaker 1>replace the battery and it requires complete disassembly of the laptop,

0:29:48.200 --> 0:29:50.920
<v Speaker 1>So it's not like something that most people, including myself,

0:29:51.000 --> 0:29:54.520
<v Speaker 1>are going to try. So I don't mean to single

0:29:54.520 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 1>out Apple here, because it is common throughout the industry.

0:29:58.360 --> 0:30:01.680
<v Speaker 1>It's just that Apple has a particular the reputation for

0:30:02.000 --> 0:30:08.520
<v Speaker 1>making their stuff difficult to you know, maintain and repair yourself.

0:30:09.280 --> 0:30:11.640
<v Speaker 1>But from what I can tell, this legislation would mean

0:30:11.640 --> 0:30:14.560
<v Speaker 1>companies would have to change their designs to make batteries

0:30:14.600 --> 0:30:18.480
<v Speaker 1>easier to remove, at the very least by independent operators

0:30:18.520 --> 0:30:21.520
<v Speaker 1>like repair shops. And again, this is all in an

0:30:21.560 --> 0:30:24.760
<v Speaker 1>effort to create rules around the production, use, and end

0:30:24.800 --> 0:30:28.000
<v Speaker 1>of life treatment of batteries. So it's pretty important stuff

0:30:28.280 --> 0:30:30.600
<v Speaker 1>and I'll be very curious to see how things evolve

0:30:30.720 --> 0:30:34.080
<v Speaker 1>if this legislation in fact is adopted. I wonder if

0:30:34.080 --> 0:30:38.120
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna see companies like Apple market different models of

0:30:38.160 --> 0:30:42.040
<v Speaker 1>their products in the EU that have these easily removable

0:30:42.040 --> 0:30:45.360
<v Speaker 1>batteries versus everywhere else, or if they will adopt a

0:30:45.360 --> 0:30:50.280
<v Speaker 1>more global approach. Um. I don't know it it's it's

0:30:50.280 --> 0:30:52.720
<v Speaker 1>a it's a big deal though, so I just wanted

0:30:52.760 --> 0:30:56.560
<v Speaker 1>to end on that. If you have suggestions for topics

0:30:56.600 --> 0:30:59.360
<v Speaker 1>I should cover in future episodes of tech Stuff, please

0:30:59.360 --> 0:31:01.360
<v Speaker 1>reach out to me on Twitter. The handle for the

0:31:01.360 --> 0:31:05.360
<v Speaker 1>show is tech Stuff H s W and I'll talk

0:31:05.360 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 1>to you again really soon. Y. Tech Stuff is an

0:31:14.440 --> 0:31:18.120
<v Speaker 1>I Heart Radio production. For more podcasts from I Heart Radio,

0:31:18.480 --> 0:31:21.640
<v Speaker 1>visit the I Heart Radio app, Apple Podcasts, or wherever

0:31:21.720 --> 0:31:23.240
<v Speaker 1>you listen to your favorite shows.