WEBVTT - Clay Talks With David Sacks

0:00:01.200 --> 0:00:05.920
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Fox Sports. Welcome in the latest episode

0:00:05.920 --> 0:00:08.799
<v Speaker 1>of Wins and Losses. I'm excited to be under way

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:11.080
<v Speaker 1>here because I think we have got a fantastic guest

0:00:11.160 --> 0:00:13.880
<v Speaker 1>that is going to take us through a lot of

0:00:13.920 --> 0:00:17.239
<v Speaker 1>really interesting things about the rise of the Internet, the

0:00:17.400 --> 0:00:21.840
<v Speaker 1>rise of business based on the Internet, and also big

0:00:21.880 --> 0:00:25.560
<v Speaker 1>tech in general. And he is David Sacks. He has

0:00:25.600 --> 0:00:29.600
<v Speaker 1>got an incredible history. I don't actually know where you're

0:00:29.720 --> 0:00:33.040
<v Speaker 1>from or where you grew up. He's a partner at

0:00:33.120 --> 0:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>Craft Invests in all different sorts of tech companies and

0:00:36.760 --> 0:00:40.120
<v Speaker 1>beyond out there. But where did you grow up? David? Like?

0:00:40.400 --> 0:00:43.280
<v Speaker 1>What was your background? And thanks for coming on with us. Yeah,

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:47.120
<v Speaker 1>great to be here. Clay Um, I was born in kipt, Africa,

0:00:47.520 --> 0:00:50.160
<v Speaker 1>and my parents immigrated the United States fast five years old.

0:00:50.200 --> 0:00:53.080
<v Speaker 1>We actually moved to Memphis, Tennessee, and that's where I

0:00:53.120 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>basically grew up until I left for college. All Right,

0:00:55.800 --> 0:00:58.720
<v Speaker 1>I had no idea. So Memphis, Tennessee. How much of

0:00:58.720 --> 0:01:01.120
<v Speaker 1>a culture shock can you member? I can't imagine. The

0:01:01.160 --> 0:01:04.920
<v Speaker 1>conveyor belt between South Africa and Memphis, Tennessee is very common.

0:01:05.280 --> 0:01:09.240
<v Speaker 1>How did that end up? Your location in the United States? Yeah.

0:01:09.360 --> 0:01:11.679
<v Speaker 1>You know, it's interesting. My dad's a doctor and they

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:14.880
<v Speaker 1>wanted to immigrate from South Africa. They didn't agree with

0:01:14.920 --> 0:01:19.320
<v Speaker 1>the political situation there back in the nineteen seventies, and uh,

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:21.959
<v Speaker 1>he got a job at the University of Tennessee Medical

0:01:22.040 --> 0:01:25.920
<v Speaker 1>Center practicing and teaching, and so that's we end up

0:01:25.959 --> 0:01:28.320
<v Speaker 1>moving too. Yeah, it was a pretty big culture shock.

0:01:29.080 --> 0:01:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Are you a sports fan? Did growing up in Memphis

0:01:31.920 --> 0:01:34.760
<v Speaker 1>in any way sort of an embed itself in you

0:01:34.920 --> 0:01:38.360
<v Speaker 1>as a college football college basketball fan or you sort

0:01:38.360 --> 0:01:41.600
<v Speaker 1>of not that interested in sports as a kid growing up? Well,

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:44.800
<v Speaker 1>there are only two real sports in Memphis at that time.

0:01:44.880 --> 0:01:49.120
<v Speaker 1>There was Memphis State Tigers basketball. That was huge. Um,

0:01:49.160 --> 0:01:52.160
<v Speaker 1>everyone looked forward to that. I remember one year we

0:01:52.200 --> 0:01:54.600
<v Speaker 1>went to the Final four with I think Keith Lee

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:59.000
<v Speaker 1>was sort of the start player then. And the other sport,

0:01:59.240 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 1>if you want to call it out in Memphis was wrestling.

0:02:02.840 --> 0:02:05.560
<v Speaker 1>Every money was wrestling at the miss South Coliseum and

0:02:05.560 --> 0:02:08.440
<v Speaker 1>those are really the only two big sports in Memphis

0:02:08.520 --> 0:02:11.960
<v Speaker 1>at that time. Obviously it changed, but did you go

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:15.880
<v Speaker 1>to those old school wrestling matches? You know, my parents

0:02:15.880 --> 0:02:18.640
<v Speaker 1>would never let me go, unfortunately, but I remember, you know,

0:02:18.720 --> 0:02:21.919
<v Speaker 1>Jerry the King Lawler was time and I would watch

0:02:21.960 --> 0:02:24.840
<v Speaker 1>that stuff on TV. And you know, as a fan now,

0:02:24.880 --> 0:02:27.520
<v Speaker 1>as a kid growing up in Nashville, the Nashville Memphis

0:02:27.639 --> 0:02:30.880
<v Speaker 1>rivalry was very real. Did you feel it in Memphis

0:02:30.880 --> 0:02:32.799
<v Speaker 1>when you were growing up? Were you aware that as

0:02:32.840 --> 0:02:37.399
<v Speaker 1>a Memphian you were feuding constantly with Nashvillians a little bit?

0:02:37.480 --> 0:02:39.679
<v Speaker 1>You know, our high school football team would eventually, you

0:02:39.720 --> 0:02:42.040
<v Speaker 1>know what, sometimes going to the state finals and play

0:02:42.080 --> 0:02:44.360
<v Speaker 1>against teams from Nashville. So yeah, there was a little bit.

0:02:44.639 --> 0:02:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Where did you go away to college from Memphis? I

0:02:47.960 --> 0:02:51.480
<v Speaker 1>went to Stanford as an undergrad, all right, So how

0:02:51.560 --> 0:02:53.920
<v Speaker 1>much of a culture shock was that? All right? So

0:02:54.000 --> 0:02:57.359
<v Speaker 1>you you come from South Africa, you then end up

0:02:57.400 --> 0:03:00.520
<v Speaker 1>in Memphis and you make the trip out to Palo Alto.

0:03:00.560 --> 0:03:03.640
<v Speaker 1>Stanford was a lot different place then, certainly than it

0:03:03.760 --> 0:03:07.639
<v Speaker 1>is now, but that wasn't a very common route. How

0:03:07.639 --> 0:03:09.639
<v Speaker 1>did you pick Stanford? Is the place you wanted to

0:03:09.680 --> 0:03:13.400
<v Speaker 1>go to? Yeah? It's interesting. I mean Stanford, I mean,

0:03:13.440 --> 0:03:14.800
<v Speaker 1>to be honest, this is the best school and that

0:03:14.840 --> 0:03:18.639
<v Speaker 1>I got into, and I had a great reputea and um,

0:03:18.680 --> 0:03:20.320
<v Speaker 1>it seemed like a great place to go to school.

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:23.440
<v Speaker 1>The campus is sort of really idyllic, like you said,

0:03:23.520 --> 0:03:28.040
<v Speaker 1>being in Palo Alto, fantastic weather. Uh, it seemed like

0:03:28.120 --> 0:03:30.760
<v Speaker 1>this an amazing place. And yeah, it was a pretty

0:03:30.800 --> 0:03:33.320
<v Speaker 1>big culture shock because the campus was very liberal. In

0:03:33.560 --> 0:03:37.200
<v Speaker 1>Memphis is uh or Tennessee in general sort of a

0:03:37.200 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 1>little bit more conservative. So there was a difference there.

0:03:40.280 --> 0:03:43.480
<v Speaker 1>But um, but the you know, the important thing about

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:46.160
<v Speaker 1>going to Stanford in the early nineties for me was

0:03:46.280 --> 0:03:48.320
<v Speaker 1>that it got me into the whole tech scene when

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:51.600
<v Speaker 1>I graduated, and that that end up being very important

0:03:51.640 --> 0:03:53.520
<v Speaker 1>for my career. By the way, I wanted to go

0:03:53.560 --> 0:03:55.680
<v Speaker 1>to Stanford Law School. They didn't let me in. I

0:03:55.720 --> 0:03:58.720
<v Speaker 1>had never been to California until I was in college,

0:03:58.760 --> 0:04:01.280
<v Speaker 1>like twenty one or twenty two, and the first time

0:04:01.280 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 1>I went to the Stanford campus, it really is heaven

0:04:04.240 --> 0:04:08.000
<v Speaker 1>on Earth. I mean it is an incredible, uh incredible place.

0:04:08.560 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 1>So so you graduate from Stanford, and do you remember

0:04:12.840 --> 0:04:14.320
<v Speaker 1>the first time you ever got on the Internet? By

0:04:14.320 --> 0:04:20.440
<v Speaker 1>the way, good question. Um, I don't remember that. I

0:04:20.480 --> 0:04:22.400
<v Speaker 1>guess you know, it must have been in the mid nineties.

0:04:22.440 --> 0:04:26.440
<v Speaker 1>People are starting to use Yahoo. Um, maybe I was

0:04:26.480 --> 0:04:28.200
<v Speaker 1>in law school, you know. After Stanford, I went to

0:04:28.240 --> 0:04:32.839
<v Speaker 1>law school at the University of Chicago, and it must

0:04:32.839 --> 0:04:35.480
<v Speaker 1>have been around that time. And you know, I thought

0:04:35.520 --> 0:04:38.480
<v Speaker 1>I had missed the whole internet thing because I had

0:04:38.520 --> 0:04:42.000
<v Speaker 1>friends at Stanford who graduated, which that was the year

0:04:42.120 --> 0:04:45.200
<v Speaker 1>that Netscape went public, and it kind of ushered in

0:04:45.320 --> 0:04:49.159
<v Speaker 1>the commercial and there were a bunch of you know,

0:04:49.240 --> 0:04:52.359
<v Speaker 1>really interesting companies getting started around then. There was you know,

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:55.520
<v Speaker 1>eBay and Amazon and Yahoo, and if you went to

0:04:56.200 --> 0:04:59.919
<v Speaker 1>graduate from Stanford you would get easily pulled into all that.

0:05:00.520 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 1>But because I graduated ninety four, I kind of felt

0:05:03.400 --> 0:05:05.560
<v Speaker 1>like I missed it, and I actually ended up in

0:05:05.640 --> 0:05:10.640
<v Speaker 1>law school. And it wasn't until when an old friend

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:14.440
<v Speaker 1>of mine from Stanford called me up and told me

0:05:14.480 --> 0:05:18.680
<v Speaker 1>about a startup he was founding, uh called Confinity but

0:05:18.720 --> 0:05:22.919
<v Speaker 1>eventually got renamed PayPal, and that was Peter Teel, and

0:05:23.040 --> 0:05:26.040
<v Speaker 1>so Peter kind of pulled me back to paol Alto

0:05:26.200 --> 0:05:31.039
<v Speaker 1>in um so Stanford. It actually ended up being very important,

0:05:31.080 --> 0:05:33.360
<v Speaker 1>but it took five years from me to come back

0:05:33.400 --> 0:05:36.080
<v Speaker 1>and do internet stuff. How did you like law school?

0:05:37.880 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 1>Law school was great. I mean your Chicago was a

0:05:39.839 --> 0:05:44.960
<v Speaker 1>very serious place and um you know, it was rigorous

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:47.920
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of great teachers and I enjoyed it,

0:05:48.000 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, but by after three years of it, I

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:52.920
<v Speaker 1>felt like I was ready to do something else. It

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:56.560
<v Speaker 1>wasn't a desire of mine to do law, but inell

0:05:56.560 --> 0:05:59.480
<v Speaker 1>actually I thought it was really interesting, and you know,

0:05:59.520 --> 0:06:02.520
<v Speaker 1>I enjoyed experience. Did you ever practice at all as

0:06:02.600 --> 0:06:04.200
<v Speaker 1>as a part of a big firm? Did you do

0:06:04.240 --> 0:06:07.400
<v Speaker 1>anything legal related? I also obviously went to law school

0:06:07.480 --> 0:06:10.400
<v Speaker 1>at Vanderbilt, as as most listeners will know, and I

0:06:10.480 --> 0:06:12.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of had the sense early on that law was

0:06:12.600 --> 0:06:14.280
<v Speaker 1>not for me. It sounds like you kind of did

0:06:14.320 --> 0:06:16.359
<v Speaker 1>as well. But did you go into any sort of

0:06:16.360 --> 0:06:19.560
<v Speaker 1>big firm lifestyle or any actual practice of law after

0:06:19.600 --> 0:06:22.599
<v Speaker 1>you graduated? You know, I spent a summer at a

0:06:22.600 --> 0:06:25.440
<v Speaker 1>at a big law firm, and that kind of reinforced

0:06:25.600 --> 0:06:29.760
<v Speaker 1>the decision for me that I wanted to do. You know.

0:06:29.880 --> 0:06:32.760
<v Speaker 1>Part of it was always that I was interested in business,

0:06:32.800 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 1>but I always felt like I wanted to be the

0:06:34.720 --> 0:06:37.719
<v Speaker 1>decision maker, you know, and not not sort of the

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:41.440
<v Speaker 1>person carrying out the instructions. And you know, lawyers are

0:06:41.480 --> 0:06:45.680
<v Speaker 1>ultimately advisors to the principle, uh and you know many

0:06:45.720 --> 0:06:49.160
<v Speaker 1>of them do, you know, fantastic work. But I always

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:50.520
<v Speaker 1>felt like I wanted to be on the other side

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:54.040
<v Speaker 1>of the table and and do something more directly in business.

0:06:54.640 --> 0:06:56.840
<v Speaker 1>Would you advise, because I get asked this question all

0:06:56.880 --> 0:07:00.080
<v Speaker 1>the time, would you advise kids who think, hey, I

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:02.640
<v Speaker 1>don't necessarily want to be a lawyer to go to

0:07:02.720 --> 0:07:05.119
<v Speaker 1>law school. If we got a one year old who's

0:07:05.160 --> 0:07:07.880
<v Speaker 1>listening right now and they're going to college, is it

0:07:07.960 --> 0:07:10.640
<v Speaker 1>a move that you would make again? Would you advise

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:13.280
<v Speaker 1>your own kids or kids who ask you for advice

0:07:13.440 --> 0:07:16.080
<v Speaker 1>whether it go to law school or not. No, I

0:07:16.120 --> 0:07:18.080
<v Speaker 1>would tell him not to because I think the only

0:07:18.120 --> 0:07:20.680
<v Speaker 1>reason to law school these days is if you really

0:07:20.840 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 1>enjoy the law and want to be a lawyer. You know,

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:25.040
<v Speaker 1>maybe you want to practice law, or you want to

0:07:25.040 --> 0:07:27.440
<v Speaker 1>be a clerk for a judge, or you know, maybe

0:07:27.760 --> 0:07:30.360
<v Speaker 1>become a judge or an elected official or something like that.

0:07:30.680 --> 0:07:32.360
<v Speaker 1>I think the reason to go to law school today

0:07:32.440 --> 0:07:34.440
<v Speaker 1>is because you're really just in the law now. Back

0:07:34.880 --> 0:07:37.720
<v Speaker 1>when I did it and you did it, there are

0:07:37.720 --> 0:07:41.200
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people who did it because I think

0:07:41.200 --> 0:07:44.880
<v Speaker 1>there weren't as many options or it wasn't as clear

0:07:44.960 --> 0:07:46.760
<v Speaker 1>what you should do. There are a lot more people

0:07:46.760 --> 0:07:50.200
<v Speaker 1>back in those days. We're talking you know years ago

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:53.520
<v Speaker 1>who went to law school knowing they'll go into business.

0:07:53.720 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 1>And I just think that today there's so many more options.

0:07:57.200 --> 0:07:58.480
<v Speaker 1>If you want to do that, you can just do

0:07:58.520 --> 0:08:02.320
<v Speaker 1>it directly, you know, spending three years of law school

0:08:02.760 --> 0:08:05.560
<v Speaker 1>and all the expense of that. Uh, there's just much

0:08:05.600 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 1>more direct ways of getting into business now. You know,

0:08:08.280 --> 0:08:12.400
<v Speaker 1>in the mid nineties, even though I had some entree

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 1>entrepreneurial instincts and desire to do something in business, I

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 1>really had no idea how to do it. It wasn't clear,

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:22.880
<v Speaker 1>like how do you start a company? And so as

0:08:22.880 --> 0:08:24.800
<v Speaker 1>a result, you kind of end up going to law

0:08:24.840 --> 0:08:29.840
<v Speaker 1>school as the next step. Uh. But but but today

0:08:29.840 --> 0:08:33.400
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't encourage it. Okay, So you mentioned you leave

0:08:33.520 --> 0:08:35.880
<v Speaker 1>law school and go back to work for a company

0:08:35.920 --> 0:08:39.120
<v Speaker 1>that would become PayPal. I imagine a lot of people

0:08:39.200 --> 0:08:42.200
<v Speaker 1>are somewhat familiar with PayPal. I've read a lot of

0:08:42.200 --> 0:08:45.079
<v Speaker 1>the corporate history of PayPal because I find it to

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:48.080
<v Speaker 1>be pretty fascinating. What how would you describe it for

0:08:48.120 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 1>people out there? You go in at nine, what is

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:54.079
<v Speaker 1>the experience? Like? Who were you working with? I think

0:08:54.080 --> 0:08:57.480
<v Speaker 1>you mentioned Peter Teal uh and what did you guys

0:08:57.840 --> 0:09:01.360
<v Speaker 1>end up achieving. Yeah. I mean, it was a really

0:09:01.360 --> 0:09:04.800
<v Speaker 1>incredible group of people who today are kind of known

0:09:04.840 --> 0:09:08.600
<v Speaker 1>as the Papal Mafia. That you know, people like Peter

0:09:08.679 --> 0:09:14.199
<v Speaker 1>Til and Elon Musk and Max Levchin and Reed Hoffman,

0:09:14.520 --> 0:09:17.079
<v Speaker 1>and the list goes on and on. Chad Hurley and

0:09:17.200 --> 0:09:21.360
<v Speaker 1>Steve chen who founded YouTube Rule off Photos our CFO

0:09:21.400 --> 0:09:23.400
<v Speaker 1>who went on to become the head of Sequoia, was

0:09:23.440 --> 0:09:26.680
<v Speaker 1>a famous venture capital firm. So a lot of really

0:09:26.720 --> 0:09:32.679
<v Speaker 1>incredible people were part of that founding team. And um

0:09:32.720 --> 0:09:35.720
<v Speaker 1>and you know today Papals a hundred billion dollar, you know,

0:09:35.800 --> 0:09:38.640
<v Speaker 1>publicly listed company, so it's, you know, twenty years later,

0:09:38.679 --> 0:09:41.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a very important company still today. But it was

0:09:41.679 --> 0:09:44.360
<v Speaker 1>really a pretty incredible group of people. When I joined in,

0:09:45.200 --> 0:09:47.440
<v Speaker 1>it was about six months before the dot com crash,

0:09:47.840 --> 0:09:52.400
<v Speaker 1>and Papal was primarily built. Although it was founded the

0:09:52.480 --> 0:09:55.640
<v Speaker 1>year before the dot com crash, it was primarily built

0:09:55.920 --> 0:09:58.720
<v Speaker 1>after and in the wake of the dot com crash,

0:09:58.760 --> 0:10:01.440
<v Speaker 1>And it was a very tough environ ronament lots, you know,

0:10:01.480 --> 0:10:03.839
<v Speaker 1>all these other startups are going out of business all

0:10:03.880 --> 0:10:08.280
<v Speaker 1>around us, and somehow we managed to persevere and create

0:10:08.679 --> 0:10:13.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, a successful outcome, and by early two thousand two.

0:10:13.360 --> 0:10:17.680
<v Speaker 1>We were the first company, first tech company tai Po

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:21.040
<v Speaker 1>since the dot com crash. Uh And like I said, today, it's,

0:10:21.160 --> 0:10:24.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, a hundred billion dollar publicly traded company. Okay,

0:10:24.320 --> 0:10:27.600
<v Speaker 1>So what do you attribute um there being such an

0:10:27.679 --> 0:10:31.240
<v Speaker 1>unbelievable amount of talent? The so called PayPal mafia. You

0:10:31.320 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 1>ran through a lot of those guys who not only

0:10:33.840 --> 0:10:37.040
<v Speaker 1>were successful in building PayPal into a company that could

0:10:37.040 --> 0:10:39.880
<v Speaker 1>go public in two thousand two and survived the dot

0:10:39.920 --> 0:10:44.040
<v Speaker 1>com implosion when everything else crashes, what attracted that amount

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:47.600
<v Speaker 1>of talent to that particular company at that point in time.

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:51.920
<v Speaker 1>It's interesting. I think the most important thing to realize

0:10:52.000 --> 0:10:55.160
<v Speaker 1>is that although these people and these names are sort

0:10:55.160 --> 0:10:58.000
<v Speaker 1>of celebrated today, they were kind of nobody's back then.

0:10:58.320 --> 0:11:00.520
<v Speaker 1>And you know, we were all pretty young at the

0:11:00.520 --> 0:11:02.800
<v Speaker 1>start of our careers. You know, when PayPal I p

0:11:02.960 --> 0:11:06.079
<v Speaker 1>owed in two thousand two, the I was the average

0:11:06.120 --> 0:11:08.160
<v Speaker 1>age on the S one, which is the sort of

0:11:08.160 --> 0:11:10.680
<v Speaker 1>corporate finaling documents, and I was twenty nine years old,

0:11:10.800 --> 0:11:14.040
<v Speaker 1>So you know, we weren't even thirty years old yet.

0:11:14.040 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 1>This this executive team, this founding team, and one of

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:21.280
<v Speaker 1>the ways that we all came together is through friendship networks.

0:11:21.320 --> 0:11:24.800
<v Speaker 1>You know, Peter Teal recruited his friends who had worked

0:11:24.840 --> 0:11:27.760
<v Speaker 1>at sorry who had gone to school with him at Stanford.

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:31.040
<v Speaker 1>That was the case with me. Max Levchin, who was

0:11:31.120 --> 0:11:34.320
<v Speaker 1>the CTO, he recruited fellow engineers that he had gone

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:36.920
<v Speaker 1>to school with that you have I And that was

0:11:36.960 --> 0:11:40.760
<v Speaker 1>pretty much how the team was collected and came together.

0:11:41.120 --> 0:11:44.200
<v Speaker 1>Is we recruited our friends, and the main reason for

0:11:44.200 --> 0:11:46.720
<v Speaker 1>that is nobody else would would work for us. Joining

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:49.840
<v Speaker 1>a startup in the early two thousand's was considered a

0:11:49.960 --> 0:11:53.400
<v Speaker 1>very risky thing to do, and it was really hard

0:11:53.440 --> 0:11:57.080
<v Speaker 1>to convince people to join this fledgling company. So how

0:11:57.120 --> 0:11:59.200
<v Speaker 1>did you meet Peter Tell at Stanford? Do you remember

0:11:59.200 --> 0:12:02.960
<v Speaker 1>the first time you guys met? What drew you together? Yeah?

0:12:02.960 --> 0:12:05.680
<v Speaker 1>So I met Peter at at Stanford. I was undergrad.

0:12:05.720 --> 0:12:07.440
<v Speaker 1>He was actually in law school at that time because

0:12:07.440 --> 0:12:11.720
<v Speaker 1>he's a few there had founded the Stanford Review, which

0:12:11.760 --> 0:12:17.520
<v Speaker 1>was the conservative, you know slash libertarian student newspaper on campus.

0:12:17.800 --> 0:12:20.480
<v Speaker 1>And I ended up becoming a writer and then the

0:12:20.559 --> 0:12:24.280
<v Speaker 1>editor in chief of the Stanford Review. And um, so

0:12:24.679 --> 0:12:28.240
<v Speaker 1>we you know, sort of bonded initially over politics and

0:12:28.360 --> 0:12:32.280
<v Speaker 1>our take on what was happening on campus. And then,

0:12:32.720 --> 0:12:36.320
<v Speaker 1>as you know, after that back in we ended up

0:12:36.360 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 1>writing a book together about what was happening at Stanford,

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:43.280
<v Speaker 1>and that was sort of the beginning of a friendship

0:12:43.360 --> 0:12:47.040
<v Speaker 1>that you know, Persevers took to this day. What's your

0:12:47.080 --> 0:12:49.079
<v Speaker 1>favorite thing that you guys published as a part of

0:12:49.080 --> 0:12:51.320
<v Speaker 1>the Stanford Review? Was there an article you wrote? Was

0:12:51.320 --> 0:12:53.480
<v Speaker 1>there an article somebody else wrote while you were an editor.

0:12:53.520 --> 0:12:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Do you recall something where you thought, man, we really

0:12:56.000 --> 0:12:58.240
<v Speaker 1>nailed it here and maybe had an impact that we

0:12:58.240 --> 0:13:02.640
<v Speaker 1>weren't anticipating being able to us. Well, you know, back

0:13:02.640 --> 0:13:04.840
<v Speaker 1>in the this is going back to the late eighties

0:13:04.920 --> 0:13:08.520
<v Speaker 1>early nineties, there was this huge debate at Stanford over

0:13:09.360 --> 0:13:11.840
<v Speaker 1>the cannon the reading list, and there was a big

0:13:11.840 --> 0:13:15.640
<v Speaker 1>protest on campus that became very famous where the protesters

0:13:15.640 --> 0:13:19.360
<v Speaker 1>started chanting, hey, hey, ho ho, Western culture has got

0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:22.959
<v Speaker 1>to go, and there was this sense that there was

0:13:23.000 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>this protest movement to overturn and throw out what they

0:13:27.960 --> 0:13:32.800
<v Speaker 1>called the dead white males of the curriculum. And they succeeded.

0:13:32.840 --> 0:13:35.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, they really ended up kind of purging the

0:13:35.080 --> 0:13:38.760
<v Speaker 1>cannon of these classic works and replacing it with something

0:13:38.960 --> 0:13:42.839
<v Speaker 1>very different, and that was really the beginning of this

0:13:42.920 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>sort of cultural revolution on campus that kind of persists

0:13:47.320 --> 0:13:50.800
<v Speaker 1>until today. And I think a lot of the political

0:13:50.880 --> 0:13:54.280
<v Speaker 1>changes that you've seen in our society over the last

0:13:55.200 --> 0:13:59.319
<v Speaker 1>you know, thirty years, or really downstream of the changes

0:13:59.360 --> 0:14:02.640
<v Speaker 1>that happened on campus, because what happens the last thirty

0:14:02.720 --> 0:14:09.760
<v Speaker 1>years is that they've been successfully graduating waves of um

0:14:09.880 --> 0:14:13.000
<v Speaker 1>of students who've been in doctrine into the cityology, and

0:14:13.040 --> 0:14:15.840
<v Speaker 1>those students have gone on to populate many of the

0:14:15.840 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 1>institutions in our in our culture. And so if you

0:14:19.760 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 1>think about you know, whether it's will capitalism or you know,

0:14:23.760 --> 0:14:26.440
<v Speaker 1>any of these other institutions that are kind of pushing

0:14:26.480 --> 0:14:30.160
<v Speaker 1>this idea of wokens today that all started on campus

0:14:30.640 --> 0:14:33.040
<v Speaker 1>in the late eighties early nineties. We called it political

0:14:33.040 --> 0:14:36.680
<v Speaker 1>correctness back then, but it was the same idea. Two

0:14:36.680 --> 0:14:40.760
<v Speaker 1>thousand two, PayPal goes public, Uh, stock took off. I

0:14:40.800 --> 0:14:43.280
<v Speaker 1>remember I went back and look before we talked, because

0:14:43.280 --> 0:14:45.000
<v Speaker 1>I was like, man, I think that stock was still

0:14:45.120 --> 0:14:47.760
<v Speaker 1>because people, what, you're right, the dot com implosion had happened,

0:14:47.800 --> 0:14:50.880
<v Speaker 1>but you guys had built back up to a really

0:14:50.920 --> 0:14:55.200
<v Speaker 1>impressive spot. Was there something that you bought or something

0:14:55.240 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 1>you were excited to buy. Do you remember a purchase

0:14:57.800 --> 0:15:01.200
<v Speaker 1>after I'm assuming you had some decent wealth, probably for

0:15:01.240 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 1>the first time in your life, certainly on that level. Yeah.

0:15:05.360 --> 0:15:07.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, Um, Peter and I both did the very

0:15:07.800 --> 0:15:10.960
<v Speaker 1>cliche thing which I now cringe a little bit at doing,

0:15:11.040 --> 0:15:15.880
<v Speaker 1>which is buying a Ferrari. Um. Yeah, you know what

0:15:16.000 --> 0:15:18.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of Ferrari did you get? Like and and and

0:15:18.400 --> 0:15:20.440
<v Speaker 1>and this is before like it was kind of probably

0:15:20.480 --> 0:15:23.240
<v Speaker 1>commonplace for a lot of these Silicon Valley companies to

0:15:23.280 --> 0:15:25.760
<v Speaker 1>be going public, Like did you just go into a

0:15:25.760 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 1>dealership in Silicon Valley? Yeah, pretty much, I think I

0:15:29.760 --> 0:15:32.720
<v Speaker 1>got I got a three five five Spider. It was

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:34.400
<v Speaker 1>like one of those you know, it was like a

0:15:34.400 --> 0:15:37.840
<v Speaker 1>black convertible. It was a really cool car. Um. But

0:15:37.920 --> 0:15:39.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, it's like I felt like it was like

0:15:39.440 --> 0:15:43.160
<v Speaker 1>driving an egg, you know it was. It was so delicate.

0:15:43.200 --> 0:15:44.760
<v Speaker 1>I felt like, you know, I was going to mess

0:15:44.760 --> 0:15:47.600
<v Speaker 1>it up every time I drove it, and uh, you know,

0:15:47.680 --> 0:15:50.680
<v Speaker 1>eventually eventually got rid of it. But what was the

0:15:50.800 --> 0:15:53.800
<v Speaker 1>girl reaction to you having a Ferrari? Like was that

0:15:53.960 --> 0:15:55.920
<v Speaker 1>something that was impressive? Did you always hear about rich

0:15:55.960 --> 0:15:58.480
<v Speaker 1>guys driving fancy cars, and sometimes you got poor guys

0:15:58.480 --> 0:16:00.840
<v Speaker 1>who drive fancy cars to try to look like rich guys.

0:16:01.240 --> 0:16:04.760
<v Speaker 1>Net positive or net negative return on value in terms

0:16:04.760 --> 0:16:08.600
<v Speaker 1>of impressions on women when you have a Ferrari. Yeah,

0:16:08.640 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't think it really helped me that much. UM.

0:16:11.440 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 1>So I don't Yeah, I don't think it helped me

0:16:13.800 --> 0:16:17.080
<v Speaker 1>that much. Um. But you know, you know, I was

0:16:17.120 --> 0:16:20.000
<v Speaker 1>only thirty years old at that time, so it was

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:23.760
<v Speaker 1>a kind that that you do when you're young, and um, yeah,

0:16:23.840 --> 0:16:25.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, I guess I enjoyed it for a couple

0:16:25.280 --> 0:16:27.680
<v Speaker 1>of years and then, uh, you know, I ended up

0:16:27.840 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 1>ended up selling it. I actually got instead, uh one

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:35.040
<v Speaker 1>of the first test loos that Elon made, um, and

0:16:35.120 --> 0:16:38.120
<v Speaker 1>that that was an interesting car. Hey, what's up everybody?

0:16:38.160 --> 0:16:41.240
<v Speaker 1>It's me three time Pro Bowlertle Warrington, and I couldn't

0:16:41.240 --> 0:16:44.640
<v Speaker 1>be more excited to announce a new podcast, call Up

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:47.680
<v Speaker 1>on Game. What is Up on Game? You asked, along

0:16:47.720 --> 0:16:51.080
<v Speaker 1>with my fellow Pro bowler T J. Huschman, Zada and

0:16:51.240 --> 0:16:55.200
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl champion. Yep, that's right, Plexico Burris. You can

0:16:55.240 --> 0:16:57.720
<v Speaker 1>only name a show with that type of talent on

0:16:57.760 --> 0:17:00.520
<v Speaker 1>it Up on Game. We're going to be daring our

0:17:00.600 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 1>real life experiences loaded with teachable moments. Listen to up

0:17:05.520 --> 0:17:08.880
<v Speaker 1>On Game with Me, LaVar Arrington, T J. Hutchman's Outa

0:17:08.960 --> 0:17:12.439
<v Speaker 1>and Plexico Birds on the I Heart Radio app, Apple

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:18.879
<v Speaker 1>podcast or wherever you get your podcast from. So I

0:17:18.920 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 1>don't even know anything about that. When did that? Was

0:17:20.880 --> 0:17:23.680
<v Speaker 1>that like an early model Tesla? I mean he's like

0:17:23.760 --> 0:17:26.040
<v Speaker 1>kind of almost making out of the back of the

0:17:27.000 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 1>studio somewhere. Yeah, I mean the first version of the

0:17:31.080 --> 0:17:34.960
<v Speaker 1>Tesla was called the Roadster and it was the first

0:17:34.960 --> 0:17:37.600
<v Speaker 1>car that Ellen made, and it was more of a

0:17:37.640 --> 0:17:43.439
<v Speaker 1>sports car and it it was in the body of

0:17:43.720 --> 0:17:46.960
<v Speaker 1>they used like the body of I think it was

0:17:47.000 --> 0:17:49.600
<v Speaker 1>like an old I want to say, Fiat or something

0:17:49.680 --> 0:17:52.639
<v Speaker 1>like that. It was a really small car. It was

0:17:52.680 --> 0:17:56.359
<v Speaker 1>a two seater and didn't have a lot of features.

0:17:56.640 --> 0:17:59.600
<v Speaker 1>It didn't even have power steering. It was pretty hard

0:17:59.640 --> 0:18:02.879
<v Speaker 1>to draw, I've to be honest, but elon. But it

0:18:02.960 --> 0:18:08.280
<v Speaker 1>was very quick. It had that speed from the electric batteries. Basically,

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:11.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, the torque was there was no gear shifting,

0:18:11.640 --> 0:18:14.639
<v Speaker 1>and the torque felt, you know, almost unlimited, and so

0:18:14.680 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 1>it was a very fast car. But it was small

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 1>and kind of hard to drive, but it got test

0:18:19.720 --> 0:18:21.679
<v Speaker 1>off the ground. What Ellen did is I think he

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:26.879
<v Speaker 1>sold maybe thousand of those cars, um and you know,

0:18:26.920 --> 0:18:29.000
<v Speaker 1>the idea was, we're, you know, we're going to sell

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:31.520
<v Speaker 1>a sports car because he could charge a lot of

0:18:31.520 --> 0:18:33.879
<v Speaker 1>money for them, and then on the heels of that

0:18:33.920 --> 0:18:36.679
<v Speaker 1>he would make a mass market car. And that's what

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:39.440
<v Speaker 1>he did is you know, I think he stopped production

0:18:39.480 --> 0:18:41.840
<v Speaker 1>of the Roaster after maybe a thousand they sold about

0:18:41.880 --> 0:18:44.720
<v Speaker 1>thousand of them, and then use that money build the

0:18:45.040 --> 0:18:49.240
<v Speaker 1>Tesla Model Less, which was their first real mainstream car,

0:18:49.920 --> 0:18:53.720
<v Speaker 1>and that was a really fantastic car that was easily

0:18:53.760 --> 0:18:57.320
<v Speaker 1>the best car I'd driven till that time. And you know,

0:18:57.800 --> 0:18:59.800
<v Speaker 1>since then they've gone on to the Model three and

0:19:00.000 --> 0:19:03.280
<v Speaker 1>not a lie and Tesla has become the most valuable

0:19:03.280 --> 0:19:06.720
<v Speaker 1>car company in the world. Tesla is an interesting story,

0:19:07.359 --> 0:19:09.119
<v Speaker 1>and I think, and I'm curious if you were the

0:19:09.160 --> 0:19:11.240
<v Speaker 1>same way. One of the things that fascinates me about

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:13.400
<v Speaker 1>a lot of the guys who made money at PayPal

0:19:13.800 --> 0:19:17.520
<v Speaker 1>is many people make tens of millions of dollars and

0:19:17.560 --> 0:19:20.200
<v Speaker 1>they throw up the peace sign and they say, Okay,

0:19:20.240 --> 0:19:22.879
<v Speaker 1>I've got money to be able to basically do whatever

0:19:22.920 --> 0:19:25.000
<v Speaker 1>I want for the rest of my life, But I'm

0:19:25.040 --> 0:19:27.520
<v Speaker 1>not interested in pushing all that money back into the

0:19:27.560 --> 0:19:31.240
<v Speaker 1>center of the table and make bigger bets going forward.

0:19:31.640 --> 0:19:33.679
<v Speaker 1>It seems like a lot of the PayPal guys and

0:19:33.840 --> 0:19:36.240
<v Speaker 1>maybe it's the psychology of the company in general, the

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:38.879
<v Speaker 1>risk taking culture. I'm curious how you would analyze it.

0:19:39.359 --> 0:19:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Almost looked at the money that you guys made at

0:19:41.600 --> 0:19:45.280
<v Speaker 1>PayPal as table stakes that allowed you to up your

0:19:45.320 --> 0:19:48.560
<v Speaker 1>wagers on things that were even more important to you.

0:19:48.960 --> 0:19:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Did you have a conscious decision about making that kind

0:19:52.080 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 1>of choice, because certainly you've gone on to other companies,

0:19:56.200 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 1>and it's easy for somebody who has a success on

0:19:58.880 --> 0:20:01.439
<v Speaker 1>the level of payper how to say, Hey, you know,

0:20:01.520 --> 0:20:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I've made my money. I can have a really comfortable life.

0:20:04.680 --> 0:20:06.639
<v Speaker 1>You guys, it seems like a lot of you said, Okay,

0:20:06.680 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 1>I've got the table stakes to do what I really

0:20:08.760 --> 0:20:12.320
<v Speaker 1>wanted to do. Conscious decision, unconscious? Am I analyzing the

0:20:12.400 --> 0:20:17.320
<v Speaker 1>larger culture in your mind correctly? Yeah? I think that's right.

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:21.440
<v Speaker 1>I mean, nobody felt out of that original PayPal crew.

0:20:21.560 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Nobody felt like, oh, let's just retired now. They all

0:20:24.800 --> 0:20:27.480
<v Speaker 1>went on to do, you know, greater things, And I

0:20:27.520 --> 0:20:30.480
<v Speaker 1>think that's why the paper Mafia's kind of remembered today

0:20:30.600 --> 0:20:34.680
<v Speaker 1>is not just for PayPal, but what they all did afterwards. Um,

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:38.879
<v Speaker 1>you know Ellen famously that really his entire fortune on

0:20:39.000 --> 0:20:42.000
<v Speaker 1>Tesla and SpaceX. He was, you know, a few weeks

0:20:42.040 --> 0:20:45.359
<v Speaker 1>away from going bankrupt and you know, ended up just

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:48.040
<v Speaker 1>back in two thousand eight in the financial crisis and

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:52.040
<v Speaker 1>put his last dime into Tesla and SpaceX to save

0:20:52.080 --> 0:20:56.320
<v Speaker 1>those companies and then ultimately succeeded. And that's why he's

0:20:57.480 --> 0:20:59.479
<v Speaker 1>the world's riches man today, or one of them, is

0:20:59.520 --> 0:21:04.320
<v Speaker 1>because he really double triple down and kind of risked

0:21:04.359 --> 0:21:08.120
<v Speaker 1>every penny he had on those ventures. But everybody else

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:10.359
<v Speaker 1>in the group really went on to do really impressive

0:21:10.400 --> 0:21:13.440
<v Speaker 1>things as well. I mean, Peter went on to become

0:21:13.480 --> 0:21:16.679
<v Speaker 1>of VC. He wrote the first check as an angel

0:21:16.720 --> 0:21:19.040
<v Speaker 1>investor into Facebook. I think it's a five mins houseand

0:21:19.040 --> 0:21:22.000
<v Speaker 1>dollar check, and then that turned into billions. And then

0:21:22.040 --> 0:21:25.080
<v Speaker 1>he was the founding investor at Volunteer, which is now

0:21:25.080 --> 0:21:28.679
<v Speaker 1>a successful public company, and you know, also founded Founders Funds,

0:21:28.760 --> 0:21:32.360
<v Speaker 1>a VC firm has done very well. Mass Love Tune

0:21:32.480 --> 0:21:35.520
<v Speaker 1>is the CTO of PayPal, founded a firm which is

0:21:35.560 --> 0:21:39.360
<v Speaker 1>now publicly traded company, went publishing the last year that's

0:21:39.400 --> 0:21:42.880
<v Speaker 1>worth you know, billions, um, and so on down the line.

0:21:42.920 --> 0:21:45.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean everyone went on to do different things. I

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:50.320
<v Speaker 1>after PayPal, created another internet company called Yammer, which was

0:21:50.600 --> 0:21:53.760
<v Speaker 1>an enterprise software company. It was one of the first

0:21:53.840 --> 0:21:57.240
<v Speaker 1>enterprise software companies to use viral tactics that I had

0:21:57.320 --> 0:21:59.760
<v Speaker 1>learned at PayPal. So yeah, we all went on to

0:22:00.200 --> 0:22:03.720
<v Speaker 1>do different things. And I think it's partly a function

0:22:03.760 --> 0:22:06.280
<v Speaker 1>the fact that we were all very young and still

0:22:06.320 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 1>had a lot of ambition, and nobody felt like they

0:22:09.600 --> 0:22:12.760
<v Speaker 1>had hit some number or something where they were just

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:16.679
<v Speaker 1>going to retire. Is it difficult to when you have

0:22:16.760 --> 0:22:19.480
<v Speaker 1>a big, big hit like you guys did with PayPal?

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:24.240
<v Speaker 1>Is it difficult to decide what the next step you're

0:22:24.280 --> 0:22:27.360
<v Speaker 1>going to take is in any way because you're almost

0:22:27.400 --> 0:22:31.520
<v Speaker 1>over analyzing it and trying to equal or have that

0:22:31.600 --> 0:22:34.359
<v Speaker 1>same kind of success you mentioned Yammer. How many things

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:36.639
<v Speaker 1>did you look at in a significant way from a

0:22:36.640 --> 0:22:40.359
<v Speaker 1>business opportunity perspective before you made the leap there? And

0:22:40.440 --> 0:22:44.760
<v Speaker 1>what was it that made you make that choice? Yes?

0:22:44.880 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 1>So for me, I mean I think you raised a

0:22:46.320 --> 0:22:49.760
<v Speaker 1>good point, which is, you know, once you've had a success,

0:22:49.800 --> 0:22:51.680
<v Speaker 1>you know, is there a danger of kind of over

0:22:51.720 --> 0:22:55.640
<v Speaker 1>analyzing the next thing and being reticent to have a failure,

0:22:55.840 --> 0:22:58.440
<v Speaker 1>you know, because now you've had a success and it

0:22:58.480 --> 0:23:00.840
<v Speaker 1>could be the opposite to right where you expect everything.

0:23:00.840 --> 0:23:03.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's just you're going to be uh analyzed

0:23:03.960 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 1>in some way based on your prior success. And I'm

0:23:07.320 --> 0:23:09.280
<v Speaker 1>just kind of fascinated by how you make the decision

0:23:09.320 --> 0:23:13.399
<v Speaker 1>to take the next opportunity. Yes, So for me, it's

0:23:13.440 --> 0:23:16.240
<v Speaker 1>it's always about the product. And what happens is I

0:23:16.280 --> 0:23:18.560
<v Speaker 1>get a product idea and I start, you know, turning

0:23:18.560 --> 0:23:20.919
<v Speaker 1>it over my head and start developing the idea, and

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:23.920
<v Speaker 1>I get kind of obsessed with it. And so it's

0:23:23.960 --> 0:23:26.639
<v Speaker 1>my passion for the product that drives everything else, and

0:23:26.760 --> 0:23:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I don't worry so much about what the business outcome

0:23:31.040 --> 0:23:33.040
<v Speaker 1>is going to be. I just try to design the

0:23:33.080 --> 0:23:35.800
<v Speaker 1>best product and try to figure out how to get

0:23:35.840 --> 0:23:37.880
<v Speaker 1>it into as many fuel as hands as possible, solve

0:23:37.960 --> 0:23:42.800
<v Speaker 1>the distribution problem, and and kind of let that drive

0:23:42.840 --> 0:23:44.520
<v Speaker 1>it and then let the shift fall where they may

0:23:44.560 --> 0:23:47.200
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the actual financial outcome. I think it's

0:23:47.880 --> 0:23:51.600
<v Speaker 1>not healthy to be thinking so much about, you know,

0:23:51.640 --> 0:23:54.439
<v Speaker 1>how much money you're going to make, because that's not

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:57.120
<v Speaker 1>something that's going to fuel you on a daily basis when,

0:23:57.359 --> 0:24:00.679
<v Speaker 1>especially when times get tough, you really want to have

0:24:00.880 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 1>passion for the idea and the mission of the company

0:24:04.359 --> 0:24:06.639
<v Speaker 1>and the product, and that's the thing that's going to

0:24:06.720 --> 0:24:10.240
<v Speaker 1>motivate you on a daily basis. So you sell uh

0:24:10.400 --> 0:24:14.440
<v Speaker 1>yammer for over a billion dollars basically four years after

0:24:14.520 --> 0:24:19.280
<v Speaker 1>its founding. Microsoft buys it. And then I'm kind of

0:24:19.320 --> 0:24:23.040
<v Speaker 1>fascinated by your move into venture capital. But before we

0:24:23.080 --> 0:24:26.760
<v Speaker 1>talk about that, are you noticing along the line you

0:24:26.800 --> 0:24:29.919
<v Speaker 1>get to Silicon Valley in ninety nine, you're right there

0:24:29.960 --> 0:24:33.800
<v Speaker 1>at the heartbeat of this culture. Zuckerberg is gonna move

0:24:33.840 --> 0:24:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Facebook out there, uh, and it continues to grow and

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:41.399
<v Speaker 1>become an incredible incubator of so many different ideas. Is

0:24:41.440 --> 0:24:45.119
<v Speaker 1>the culture substantially evolving as you see it? Do you

0:24:45.200 --> 0:24:47.840
<v Speaker 1>like the evolution that you're seeing in Silicon Valley? Do

0:24:47.880 --> 0:24:52.159
<v Speaker 1>you dislike it? Well, the culture Silicon Valley is always

0:24:52.160 --> 0:24:55.760
<v Speaker 1>a really important contributor to the sasum of all the

0:24:55.760 --> 0:24:59.399
<v Speaker 1>companies that were there historically. And so you know, I

0:24:59.440 --> 0:25:03.359
<v Speaker 1>really sell when when I moved back to Silicon Valley

0:25:03.600 --> 0:25:07.439
<v Speaker 1>back to PayPal, it really felt like the center of

0:25:07.440 --> 0:25:09.920
<v Speaker 1>the universe. You would drive along the one on one

0:25:09.960 --> 0:25:13.640
<v Speaker 1>freeway and you would see all these office buildings, these shiny,

0:25:13.840 --> 0:25:17.600
<v Speaker 1>gleaming new office buildings that had just been constructed in

0:25:17.600 --> 0:25:19.399
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of years, and they all had the

0:25:19.440 --> 0:25:23.600
<v Speaker 1>logos of companies that didn't exist a few years before.

0:25:24.040 --> 0:25:27.000
<v Speaker 1>And it really felt like something magical was happening where

0:25:27.040 --> 0:25:31.440
<v Speaker 1>you could build these incredible companies so quickly, and there

0:25:31.480 --> 0:25:33.440
<v Speaker 1>was nowhere else in the world you could really do that.

0:25:33.480 --> 0:25:36.639
<v Speaker 1>There was, you know, there was nowhere else where you

0:25:36.680 --> 0:25:38.880
<v Speaker 1>could find the money to do it, where you get

0:25:38.960 --> 0:25:42.560
<v Speaker 1>vcs to write you these checks so quickly, you know,

0:25:42.680 --> 0:25:44.960
<v Speaker 1>without spending months thinking about it. They could do it

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:47.479
<v Speaker 1>in days or weeks, and you could find the talent

0:25:47.560 --> 0:25:49.879
<v Speaker 1>that you needed to build these companies. So it was

0:25:49.920 --> 0:25:54.200
<v Speaker 1>really a magical place. And what happened between say two

0:25:54.240 --> 0:25:59.840
<v Speaker 1>thousand and over that twenty year period is that looking

0:26:00.320 --> 0:26:03.119
<v Speaker 1>just kind of getting it got bigger and bigger. If

0:26:03.160 --> 0:26:06.040
<v Speaker 1>you go back to the ninety nineties, it was sort

0:26:06.080 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 1>of clustered around Palo Alto, but you know, it got

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:12.840
<v Speaker 1>it kept growing to the point where it included San

0:26:12.840 --> 0:26:16.320
<v Speaker 1>Francisco and the East Bay, and then it went south

0:26:16.359 --> 0:26:20.919
<v Speaker 1>to San Jose, and so Silicon Valley really became Silicon Bay,

0:26:20.960 --> 0:26:23.479
<v Speaker 1>and it kept getting bigger and bigger, and it created

0:26:23.520 --> 0:26:25.800
<v Speaker 1>this sort of bounty of riches for the city of

0:26:25.800 --> 0:26:29.600
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco, even though the city itself had really done

0:26:29.640 --> 0:26:33.360
<v Speaker 1>nothing to encourage Silicon Valley, and in fact, I had

0:26:33.400 --> 0:26:36.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot of policies and politicians who were hostile to

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:41.680
<v Speaker 1>the tech industry. It you know, made San Francisco this

0:26:42.040 --> 0:26:45.640
<v Speaker 1>beneficiary of these incredible riches. And we can talk more

0:26:45.640 --> 0:26:48.760
<v Speaker 1>about that. But then what happened, I think during COVID,

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:50.960
<v Speaker 1>and this is really new, this is the last couple

0:26:50.960 --> 0:26:54.399
<v Speaker 1>of years, is that because of COVID, and you know,

0:26:54.480 --> 0:26:58.280
<v Speaker 1>that started this whole era of remote work and distributed work.

0:26:58.640 --> 0:27:00.760
<v Speaker 1>People started doing their jobs from home and then they

0:27:00.760 --> 0:27:03.199
<v Speaker 1>realized that they could do these jobs from anywhere. And

0:27:03.240 --> 0:27:05.040
<v Speaker 1>so this whole tech industry of the last couple of

0:27:05.119 --> 0:27:08.480
<v Speaker 1>years has decentralized a lot, and you started to see

0:27:08.560 --> 0:27:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the rise of tech hubs in places like Austin and Miami. Um,

0:27:14.640 --> 0:27:17.520
<v Speaker 1>you know, New York City has gotten strong. L A

0:27:17.600 --> 0:27:21.359
<v Speaker 1>and Seattle were already somewhat strong. But you're seeing now

0:27:21.760 --> 0:27:26.680
<v Speaker 1>tech emerge everywhere and it's not just Silicon Valley anymore.

0:27:26.680 --> 0:27:29.320
<v Speaker 1>And I'd say maybe fifty of the companies we invest

0:27:29.359 --> 0:27:32.879
<v Speaker 1>in today are still in Silicon Valley or the Bay Area,

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:36.879
<v Speaker 1>but the other fift are increasingly in a distributed number

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:39.320
<v Speaker 1>of locations. And I think it's really good for the

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:43.200
<v Speaker 1>country actually, that this wealth and prosperity that's being created

0:27:43.200 --> 0:27:45.399
<v Speaker 1>by the new economy is not just going to be

0:27:45.480 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 1>in the Bay Area, but that's going to be all

0:27:47.040 --> 0:27:49.640
<v Speaker 1>over the United States. Yeah, I'll give you By the way,

0:27:49.640 --> 0:27:52.040
<v Speaker 1>we're talking to David sachs Uh, this is wins and Losses.

0:27:52.040 --> 0:27:54.639
<v Speaker 1>I'm Clay Travis. I'll give you an example of that, David.

0:27:54.680 --> 0:27:56.520
<v Speaker 1>I spent a lot of time going out to l

0:27:56.600 --> 0:28:00.600
<v Speaker 1>a UM obviously because Fox was based there for Fox Sports,

0:28:00.640 --> 0:28:03.120
<v Speaker 1>and spent months and months out there, and I would

0:28:03.119 --> 0:28:05.919
<v Speaker 1>go around and look at everybody's houses in l a

0:28:06.600 --> 0:28:08.359
<v Speaker 1>and then I, you know, you see how much they cost.

0:28:08.960 --> 0:28:11.880
<v Speaker 1>And then I'd come back to the Nashville area and

0:28:12.040 --> 0:28:14.520
<v Speaker 1>I would be like, you know, my house that that

0:28:14.560 --> 0:28:18.720
<v Speaker 1>we initially bought here, uh, would cost millions and millions

0:28:18.720 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 1>of dollars in l a and it was a fraction

0:28:21.600 --> 0:28:24.440
<v Speaker 1>of that in Nashville, right. Um, And what I've seen

0:28:24.480 --> 0:28:27.199
<v Speaker 1>with COVID is it accelerated things to such an extent

0:28:27.560 --> 0:28:30.919
<v Speaker 1>that now there's not as big of a difference. You know,

0:28:30.960 --> 0:28:33.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of people are cashing out in California, in

0:28:33.320 --> 0:28:36.440
<v Speaker 1>New York, in the Chicago area and moving to where

0:28:36.480 --> 0:28:39.800
<v Speaker 1>I live in the Nashville area. And the prices have

0:28:39.960 --> 0:28:43.720
<v Speaker 1>skyrocketed in Nashville. And I think that's because the top

0:28:43.720 --> 0:28:47.320
<v Speaker 1>ten percent of income earners, to your point, have realized

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:49.920
<v Speaker 1>that they can basically live anywhere in the United States

0:28:49.920 --> 0:28:53.720
<v Speaker 1>and do their same job, and absent COVID, many of

0:28:53.760 --> 0:28:56.040
<v Speaker 1>them would not have risk that, right. You would never

0:28:56.080 --> 0:28:58.880
<v Speaker 1>have said, oh, okay, I'm gonna go ahead and relocate

0:28:58.920 --> 0:29:01.240
<v Speaker 1>and do my job that I had been doing in California,

0:29:01.320 --> 0:29:03.840
<v Speaker 1>in Nashville or in Austin or a place like that.

0:29:04.320 --> 0:29:07.120
<v Speaker 1>And uh. And certainly people who are running hedge funds

0:29:07.120 --> 0:29:09.520
<v Speaker 1>in New York are finally saying, screw it, I'm not

0:29:09.520 --> 0:29:12.080
<v Speaker 1>gonna pay you know, fifteen percent state income tax and

0:29:12.120 --> 0:29:14.280
<v Speaker 1>I can go to Florida pay nothing, being better weather,

0:29:14.520 --> 0:29:16.960
<v Speaker 1>get a bigger place. But it seems like in many

0:29:17.120 --> 0:29:22.080
<v Speaker 1>of these areas that lack of similarity in housing prices

0:29:22.120 --> 0:29:24.520
<v Speaker 1>has vanished, right, Um, And I think it's reflective of

0:29:24.560 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 1>what you're saying, which is people with high level talent

0:29:27.160 --> 0:29:30.800
<v Speaker 1>and frankly high level incomes being more evenly distributed across

0:29:30.800 --> 0:29:33.120
<v Speaker 1>the country than they might have been in the earth

0:29:33.160 --> 0:29:36.840
<v Speaker 1>in the late nineties and the early two thousand's for sure. Yeah,

0:29:36.880 --> 0:29:38.600
<v Speaker 1>I think I think that's right, and I think it's

0:29:38.600 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 1>all been enabled by this cultural shift that we don't

0:29:41.400 --> 0:29:44.280
<v Speaker 1>all have to meet in person almost all of my

0:29:44.320 --> 0:29:47.360
<v Speaker 1>meetings these days or by zoom. Yeah, you know, the

0:29:47.360 --> 0:29:50.600
<v Speaker 1>factors that I invest in, they are fine with meeting

0:29:50.760 --> 0:29:53.840
<v Speaker 1>by zoom and in fact, they like it better. It

0:29:53.920 --> 0:29:56.600
<v Speaker 1>saves everyone, you know, a bunch of drive time and

0:29:56.800 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 1>I can be wherever I am and um, and they

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:02.080
<v Speaker 1>can be in a different city. So everything kind of

0:30:02.080 --> 0:30:05.280
<v Speaker 1>moved to zoom in in the VC industry. I'm not

0:30:05.280 --> 0:30:07.480
<v Speaker 1>sure that's totally true. If you're if you're trying to

0:30:07.480 --> 0:30:09.640
<v Speaker 1>build a company, I think there is some value in

0:30:09.960 --> 0:30:12.960
<v Speaker 1>having people under the same roof working together, but certainly

0:30:13.000 --> 0:30:16.720
<v Speaker 1>for a VC everything's moved to zoom And so if

0:30:17.240 --> 0:30:19.959
<v Speaker 1>that's the case, if if you're somebody who who's kind

0:30:19.960 --> 0:30:22.840
<v Speaker 1>of a knowledge work and do your job remotely from anywhere.

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 1>Now you're kind of freed up to live anywhere you want.

0:30:25.440 --> 0:30:27.360
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to just live in the in the

0:30:27.560 --> 0:30:31.360
<v Speaker 1>in your sort of industry town and um and so yeah,

0:30:31.360 --> 0:30:33.720
<v Speaker 1>there's been a lot more decentralization. I mean, it used

0:30:33.720 --> 0:30:36.000
<v Speaker 1>to be that if you wanted to do tech in

0:30:36.040 --> 0:30:37.960
<v Speaker 1>a serious way, you have to go to the Bay Area.

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:41.560
<v Speaker 1>If you wanted to do entertainment in a serious way,

0:30:41.600 --> 0:30:44.120
<v Speaker 1>you have to go to l A or finance was

0:30:44.160 --> 0:30:46.680
<v Speaker 1>in New York, um, and so on down the line.

0:30:47.000 --> 0:30:49.959
<v Speaker 1>But now people are liberated. And so I think cities

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:54.959
<v Speaker 1>are starting to realize that they're competing for knowledge workers. Um,

0:30:55.000 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 1>you know, not just companies anymore. You know, cities used

0:30:57.440 --> 0:31:00.440
<v Speaker 1>to compete to get the company headquarters is to move

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:03.040
<v Speaker 1>to their city. Now they're kind of competing for individual

0:31:03.080 --> 0:31:06.520
<v Speaker 1>knowledge workers to make that decision. And the low tax

0:31:06.560 --> 0:31:09.960
<v Speaker 1>states or no tax states like Florida and Texas um

0:31:10.120 --> 0:31:13.719
<v Speaker 1>are just seeing you know, there are incredible beneficiaries of that.

0:31:14.200 --> 0:31:16.600
<v Speaker 1>And if you look at the migration stats across the

0:31:16.680 --> 0:31:19.480
<v Speaker 1>United States, all the states that are growing right now

0:31:19.640 --> 0:31:23.640
<v Speaker 1>are basically the zero tax or low tax states and

0:31:23.680 --> 0:31:26.680
<v Speaker 1>the states that are seeing the biggest outflows, or California,

0:31:26.760 --> 0:31:29.840
<v Speaker 1>New York and the other states that have very high taxes.

0:31:29.960 --> 0:31:33.640
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's a it's a really big change. We're

0:31:33.640 --> 0:31:36.240
<v Speaker 1>talking to David Sachs. All right, so you now do

0:31:36.400 --> 0:31:39.719
<v Speaker 1>venture capital. I'm not an expert at venture campit capital

0:31:39.720 --> 0:31:41.480
<v Speaker 1>at all. I know just enough to be good enough

0:31:41.520 --> 0:31:43.280
<v Speaker 1>at content that I can build a business and be

0:31:43.320 --> 0:31:45.440
<v Speaker 1>able to sell it, but I wouldn't be great at

0:31:45.520 --> 0:31:50.120
<v Speaker 1>spreadsheets or anything like that. Um, what percentage of companies

0:31:50.160 --> 0:31:54.080
<v Speaker 1>that you look at do you end up investing in? Uh,

0:31:54.480 --> 0:31:57.400
<v Speaker 1>by the time they go through their fundraising rounds, Like

0:31:57.440 --> 0:32:00.360
<v Speaker 1>what kind of hit rate would have fund like yours have?

0:32:00.600 --> 0:32:03.080
<v Speaker 1>In terms of the personage of companies that you're investing in,

0:32:04.560 --> 0:32:08.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you probably one in a thousands. But yeah,

0:32:08.960 --> 0:32:11.120
<v Speaker 1>but I mean obviously that's not me. I can't take

0:32:11.480 --> 0:32:14.360
<v Speaker 1>a thousand meetings without doing crazy. So we have a

0:32:15.160 --> 0:32:17.720
<v Speaker 1>we have a team, you know, close to forty people

0:32:17.760 --> 0:32:22.000
<v Speaker 1>now and between all of them, they look at thousands

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:26.480
<v Speaker 1>of companies every year for us to make you know, um,

0:32:26.920 --> 0:32:29.960
<v Speaker 1>one to two dozen investments at various stages. So it

0:32:30.040 --> 0:32:32.120
<v Speaker 1>might be a little better hit rate than that. It

0:32:32.200 --> 0:32:35.920
<v Speaker 1>might be more like one something like that. But that

0:32:36.000 --> 0:32:38.640
<v Speaker 1>doesn't mean that every company we go deep on, right.

0:32:38.680 --> 0:32:41.239
<v Speaker 1>It might mean that we take a meeting, or it

0:32:41.320 --> 0:32:44.440
<v Speaker 1>might just be that they send us their information. But

0:32:44.520 --> 0:32:46.880
<v Speaker 1>our top of funnel, when we measure it is is

0:32:46.920 --> 0:32:51.600
<v Speaker 1>thousands of companies. Um, what is your biggest hit? What

0:32:51.760 --> 0:32:53.720
<v Speaker 1>is the company that you invested in as a venture

0:32:53.760 --> 0:32:56.360
<v Speaker 1>capital investor? And it has been an absolute home run

0:32:58.080 --> 0:33:01.200
<v Speaker 1>well before. So I started Craft in two thousand seventeen,

0:33:01.200 --> 0:33:04.560
<v Speaker 1>about five years ago to institute size and professionalize what

0:33:04.600 --> 0:33:06.880
<v Speaker 1>I was doing. But I've been investing, you know, pretty

0:33:06.960 --> 0:33:10.040
<v Speaker 1>much since you know, after we sold PayPal in two

0:33:10.080 --> 0:33:14.040
<v Speaker 1>thousand two. Probably the biggest hit to day would be

0:33:14.360 --> 0:33:19.120
<v Speaker 1>investing in Facebook back in She's Camember exactly what year

0:33:19.160 --> 0:33:20.479
<v Speaker 1>it was, and it was like two five or two

0:33:20.480 --> 0:33:22.480
<v Speaker 1>thousand and six that you know, what kind of valuation

0:33:22.480 --> 0:33:25.800
<v Speaker 1>would Facebook have had at the time that you invested. Well,

0:33:25.840 --> 0:33:28.200
<v Speaker 1>I invested in a in the growth round, So I

0:33:28.240 --> 0:33:31.560
<v Speaker 1>wasn't as early as Peter Peter invested like at a

0:33:31.600 --> 0:33:34.200
<v Speaker 1>five million dollar valuation. I think by the time I invested,

0:33:34.200 --> 0:33:36.560
<v Speaker 1>it was sort of at a at a five million

0:33:36.560 --> 0:33:39.960
<v Speaker 1>million dollar valuation or something like that UM and then

0:33:39.960 --> 0:33:43.200
<v Speaker 1>it went public at fifty fifty billion dollar valuation. Today

0:33:43.200 --> 0:33:46.680
<v Speaker 1>it's about five billion. You know, there were some other

0:33:46.680 --> 0:33:50.479
<v Speaker 1>ones too. I mean I invested in UM, Valanteer, invest

0:33:50.520 --> 0:33:56.840
<v Speaker 1>in Airbnb, slack Um, SpaceX you know Elon's company, which

0:33:56.880 --> 0:34:00.960
<v Speaker 1>has done phenomenally. Would you invest in Tesla? You know,

0:34:01.760 --> 0:34:03.600
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how I missed that, but I bought

0:34:03.600 --> 0:34:05.880
<v Speaker 1>one of the original tests by the non investment company,

0:34:05.880 --> 0:34:08.000
<v Speaker 1>and that was did you look at the Tesla? I'm

0:34:08.000 --> 0:34:09.719
<v Speaker 1>just kind of curious. Did you look at any of

0:34:09.719 --> 0:34:12.520
<v Speaker 1>the VC money when they raised and say, hey, I'm

0:34:12.560 --> 0:34:15.120
<v Speaker 1>consciously not going to make that choice, Like, yeah, I'm

0:34:15.160 --> 0:34:17.319
<v Speaker 1>just kind of curious. You liked the car uh and

0:34:17.400 --> 0:34:20.120
<v Speaker 1>obviously your friends with Elen. I'm just sure curious how

0:34:20.200 --> 0:34:23.120
<v Speaker 1>you didn't end up in there. Well I didn't. I

0:34:23.120 --> 0:34:25.680
<v Speaker 1>didn't look at it. I wasn't a professional VC or anything,

0:34:25.719 --> 0:34:27.480
<v Speaker 1>so I didn't look at it. You know, he never

0:34:27.520 --> 0:34:30.160
<v Speaker 1>presented it to me. He certainly could have called him

0:34:30.200 --> 0:34:32.000
<v Speaker 1>up and said hey, could I invest? I actually did

0:34:32.000 --> 0:34:35.080
<v Speaker 1>that with SpaceX UM. I emailed him and said, you know, hey,

0:34:35.080 --> 0:34:38.000
<v Speaker 1>can I invest? Me? Said sure, so I invested personally,

0:34:38.000 --> 0:34:41.080
<v Speaker 1>and then we invested as a VC later. Um. You know,

0:34:41.120 --> 0:34:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I don't know why I didn't occurred to me. I

0:34:42.560 --> 0:34:45.160
<v Speaker 1>just I guess I just thought that the idea of

0:34:45.200 --> 0:34:49.320
<v Speaker 1>a new car company was so far outside the realm

0:34:49.680 --> 0:34:53.279
<v Speaker 1>of what I thought I knew about investing, you know,

0:34:53.360 --> 0:34:57.320
<v Speaker 1>because all the other investment selves making were software investments

0:34:57.600 --> 0:35:01.400
<v Speaker 1>or tech investment. And I guess what i'd realize is

0:35:01.400 --> 0:35:05.360
<v Speaker 1>that was basically creating an iPad on wheels, and I

0:35:05.360 --> 0:35:07.000
<v Speaker 1>should have just seen it as a car company. I

0:35:07.000 --> 0:35:10.040
<v Speaker 1>should have really seen it as like a fundamental tech innovation.

0:35:10.760 --> 0:35:13.120
<v Speaker 1>And so I guess we has to have the innovation,

0:35:13.120 --> 0:35:16.719
<v Speaker 1>the imagination to see what a radical innovation it would be.

0:35:17.400 --> 0:35:21.160
<v Speaker 1>And I'm curious. So those are a lot of hits, obviously, Tesla,

0:35:21.200 --> 0:35:24.719
<v Speaker 1>maybe not a not a hit. What's the worst decision

0:35:24.760 --> 0:35:27.680
<v Speaker 1>you've made in terms of not investing or investing in

0:35:27.719 --> 0:35:29.959
<v Speaker 1>your like? So I'll give you an example, small level.

0:35:30.520 --> 0:35:32.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't even know if you know this. I decided

0:35:32.920 --> 0:35:36.799
<v Speaker 1>that I would get into the pants business early on

0:35:36.840 --> 0:35:39.160
<v Speaker 1>when I launched out Kick, and the idea I think

0:35:39.280 --> 0:35:41.719
<v Speaker 1>was the right one, which was I don't want to

0:35:41.800 --> 0:35:47.280
<v Speaker 1>be uh reliant upon advertising dollars to monetize my business.

0:35:47.400 --> 0:35:50.399
<v Speaker 1>I would rather my content business. I would rather own

0:35:50.560 --> 0:35:54.160
<v Speaker 1>businesses that I could advertise against instead of having to

0:35:54.200 --> 0:35:57.319
<v Speaker 1>go out hat in hand always selling ad dollars, right,

0:35:57.719 --> 0:36:01.319
<v Speaker 1>and so find things that over lap with, uh, the

0:36:01.400 --> 0:36:04.200
<v Speaker 1>audience that I'm already reaching from a content perspective, things

0:36:04.200 --> 0:36:06.440
<v Speaker 1>that they would want to buy. And you know, at

0:36:06.480 --> 0:36:08.680
<v Speaker 1>some point when you're staring trying to tell the difference

0:36:08.719 --> 0:36:11.880
<v Speaker 1>between you know, one pantone color and another one, like

0:36:11.920 --> 0:36:15.200
<v Speaker 1>the difference between auburn orange and Tennessee orange for somebody

0:36:15.400 --> 0:36:18.280
<v Speaker 1>frankly who maybe a little bit color blind and also

0:36:18.400 --> 0:36:21.880
<v Speaker 1>certainly is not is not fashion savvy, uh, you know,

0:36:22.040 --> 0:36:24.560
<v Speaker 1>and and shipping them in and tie dying and the

0:36:24.600 --> 0:36:27.839
<v Speaker 1>sizing and pants are really actually a complicated business. So

0:36:27.920 --> 0:36:30.960
<v Speaker 1>I lost like fifty thou dollars pretty fast in pants,

0:36:31.000 --> 0:36:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and I was like, this is such a stupid idea.

0:36:32.719 --> 0:36:35.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, you see athletes who go broke, and you know,

0:36:35.040 --> 0:36:37.000
<v Speaker 1>if they did a documentary on me, wo'd be like

0:36:37.239 --> 0:36:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Clay Travis decided going to the pants business. He lost money.

0:36:40.280 --> 0:36:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Was there anything you got into on a bad perspective

0:36:43.680 --> 0:36:45.120
<v Speaker 1>or you were like, this is just such a stupid

0:36:45.120 --> 0:36:47.719
<v Speaker 1>business that I ended up getting involved in and or

0:36:47.760 --> 0:36:50.840
<v Speaker 1>something that you looked at, looked at heavily, then passed

0:36:50.840 --> 0:36:54.880
<v Speaker 1>on and it ended up being wildly successful. Yeah, I

0:36:54.880 --> 0:36:57.560
<v Speaker 1>mean there's definitely things that I've invested in that haven't worked.

0:36:57.640 --> 0:37:00.759
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is this is absolutely a bad average game.

0:37:00.800 --> 0:37:03.799
<v Speaker 1>And nobody that's you know, a thousand what's a good

0:37:03.840 --> 0:37:05.920
<v Speaker 1>what's a good batting average? In the VC business? Like,

0:37:05.960 --> 0:37:08.560
<v Speaker 1>what are you shooting for? I know, your returns overall,

0:37:08.880 --> 0:37:11.400
<v Speaker 1>but what kind of hit rate should you have if

0:37:11.400 --> 0:37:15.319
<v Speaker 1>you're doing a good job in VC investing, Well, it's

0:37:15.360 --> 0:37:18.080
<v Speaker 1>probably like baseball and if you're batting three something, you're

0:37:18.120 --> 0:37:22.240
<v Speaker 1>like Hall of Fame r um. Yeah, I mean really,

0:37:22.440 --> 0:37:25.040
<v Speaker 1>although it's not just um, I mean, you'll appreciate this.

0:37:25.200 --> 0:37:28.560
<v Speaker 1>It's not just batting average. It's also slugging. Slugging because

0:37:28.560 --> 0:37:30.719
<v Speaker 1>you can hit you can hit like a thousand home

0:37:30.800 --> 0:37:33.279
<v Speaker 1>runs on one swing, right, as opposed to just being

0:37:33.320 --> 0:37:36.000
<v Speaker 1>able to maximize, you know, one run. You can get

0:37:36.040 --> 0:37:39.560
<v Speaker 1>a thousand runs on a swing exactly. And and that's

0:37:39.719 --> 0:37:43.839
<v Speaker 1>and that's really what that's one of the biggest um

0:37:44.000 --> 0:37:46.759
<v Speaker 1>things about the VC business that's kind of nonintuitive to

0:37:46.840 --> 0:37:50.120
<v Speaker 1>people is that it's not about how many losers that

0:37:50.239 --> 0:37:54.239
<v Speaker 1>you have. It's about the magnitude of your winners. And sometimes,

0:37:54.280 --> 0:37:56.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, you can be wrong about everything, but that

0:37:57.200 --> 0:38:00.400
<v Speaker 1>one decision you were right about ends up with turning

0:38:00.680 --> 0:38:03.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, ten times your funds. So, um, that tends

0:38:04.000 --> 0:38:05.480
<v Speaker 1>to be that if you look at kind of the

0:38:05.560 --> 0:38:09.680
<v Speaker 1>great VC funds, it's not about how often they were right,

0:38:09.719 --> 0:38:14.319
<v Speaker 1>it's about the magnitude of their winners. And UM, so yeah,

0:38:14.400 --> 0:38:16.040
<v Speaker 1>but I mean I think we've had a pretty good

0:38:16.080 --> 0:38:19.240
<v Speaker 1>batting average. You know, I've been in about twenty five

0:38:19.600 --> 0:38:23.880
<v Speaker 1>unicorn companies. Um. You know, we defined unicorns companies that

0:38:24.000 --> 0:38:29.640
<v Speaker 1>end up being worth a billion dollars or more. And um,

0:38:29.680 --> 0:38:31.880
<v Speaker 1>you know that the most recent one for us was

0:38:31.880 --> 0:38:35.400
<v Speaker 1>was crypto. Um we you know, we made some crypto

0:38:35.440 --> 0:38:39.200
<v Speaker 1>investments back in two thousand, seventeen, two eight, and they

0:38:39.360 --> 0:38:42.399
<v Speaker 1>returned our first fund. So you know that was sort

0:38:42.440 --> 0:38:45.719
<v Speaker 1>of like a forty or fifty x investment in five

0:38:45.800 --> 0:38:48.960
<v Speaker 1>years based on making you know, based on investing in crypto.

0:38:49.840 --> 0:38:53.680
<v Speaker 1>I think you also invested in a movie, right, Um,

0:38:53.840 --> 0:38:55.680
<v Speaker 1>thank you for smoking am I right about this? How

0:38:55.680 --> 0:38:59.320
<v Speaker 1>did that happen? Uh? And and have you gotten involved

0:38:59.440 --> 0:39:03.439
<v Speaker 1>in other creative endeavors, which are certainly different than trying

0:39:03.440 --> 0:39:07.319
<v Speaker 1>to analyze software companies or tech related funds. Yeah. Yeah,

0:39:07.320 --> 0:39:09.319
<v Speaker 1>I guess that you're If you're looking for me to

0:39:09.400 --> 0:39:13.320
<v Speaker 1>identify a bad investment, I'd say anything in the movie industry. Now. Actually,

0:39:13.360 --> 0:39:16.120
<v Speaker 1>we didn't lose money on Thinking for Smoking. We actually

0:39:16.640 --> 0:39:18.640
<v Speaker 1>did fine. It ended up being one of the big

0:39:18.719 --> 0:39:22.800
<v Speaker 1>hits of I think two thousand five, two thousand six. Um,

0:39:22.840 --> 0:39:26.040
<v Speaker 1>this is an independent movie. I financed it along with

0:39:26.080 --> 0:39:29.239
<v Speaker 1>a few friends. Peter and e la On all contributed

0:39:29.280 --> 0:39:31.840
<v Speaker 1>and they were executive producers. This was a script I

0:39:31.880 --> 0:39:35.040
<v Speaker 1>found that was written by Jason Weightman, who ended up

0:39:35.040 --> 0:39:38.319
<v Speaker 1>directing the movie, based on a book by Christopher Buckley.

0:39:38.360 --> 0:39:42.120
<v Speaker 1>And um, I just thought it was a fantastic So, yeah,

0:39:42.160 --> 0:39:43.960
<v Speaker 1>this is this is amazing to me, Like, so, how

0:39:43.960 --> 0:39:47.200
<v Speaker 1>do you find a script? Right? Like? So, uh, you

0:39:47.239 --> 0:39:50.120
<v Speaker 1>are thinking, after you've made some money in PayPal, hey,

0:39:50.160 --> 0:39:52.680
<v Speaker 1>I like movie. Certainly at Stanford you've talked about the

0:39:52.680 --> 0:39:56.239
<v Speaker 1>culture of political correctness and whatnot. Were you thinking, hey,

0:39:56.280 --> 0:40:00.399
<v Speaker 1>maybe I'll get involved in the entertainment industry in some way. Yeah,

0:40:00.480 --> 0:40:02.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean it was just sort of an unfuneral venture

0:40:02.719 --> 0:40:05.320
<v Speaker 1>for me where I decided to create a movie production

0:40:05.360 --> 0:40:08.040
<v Speaker 1>company and it was like a startup, you know, We're like,

0:40:08.120 --> 0:40:10.680
<v Speaker 1>let's let's see, let's understand what it takes to make

0:40:10.680 --> 0:40:13.200
<v Speaker 1>a movie. Let's try and make a better one. And

0:40:13.239 --> 0:40:16.239
<v Speaker 1>we went out looking at projects and we probably looked

0:40:16.280 --> 0:40:19.799
<v Speaker 1>at a thousand scripts, and I thought that Jason had

0:40:19.800 --> 0:40:23.040
<v Speaker 1>written the best one I had seen, and someone had

0:40:23.080 --> 0:40:25.120
<v Speaker 1>given it to me as a writing sample for him actually,

0:40:25.680 --> 0:40:27.360
<v Speaker 1>and the question I asked was, wait, why is the

0:40:27.360 --> 0:40:29.279
<v Speaker 1>writing sample? Why why don't we just make this? And

0:40:29.600 --> 0:40:33.239
<v Speaker 1>the reason why is because the lights have been fragmented.

0:40:33.640 --> 0:40:38.720
<v Speaker 1>Warner Brothers owned the book and Jason script was actually

0:40:38.719 --> 0:40:42.160
<v Speaker 1>owned by Milk Gibson's company Icon, And anyway, we spent

0:40:42.280 --> 0:40:44.880
<v Speaker 1>something like two years trying to unravel the right situation

0:40:44.920 --> 0:40:47.719
<v Speaker 1>and acquire all the rights, and we finally did that.

0:40:47.920 --> 0:40:50.000
<v Speaker 1>Then we could make it as an intendent movie, and

0:40:50.040 --> 0:40:52.440
<v Speaker 1>we did that, and we took it to the Frounto

0:40:52.480 --> 0:40:55.920
<v Speaker 1>Film Festival and Sun Dance and ended up being a

0:40:55.920 --> 0:40:58.880
<v Speaker 1>pretty big hit um in terms, you know, as a

0:40:58.960 --> 0:41:01.359
<v Speaker 1>hit creatively want a lot of awards, and it did

0:41:01.360 --> 0:41:06.000
<v Speaker 1>something like the box office on an eight million dollar budget,

0:41:06.160 --> 0:41:07.840
<v Speaker 1>and you know, it's one of these kind of cult

0:41:07.880 --> 0:41:13.359
<v Speaker 1>movies that's and it launched Jason Reitman's career. He's ended

0:41:13.440 --> 0:41:17.920
<v Speaker 1>up becoming a very very big director in Hollywood. The

0:41:17.960 --> 0:41:19.759
<v Speaker 1>you know, my takeaway from it though, is in terms

0:41:19.800 --> 0:41:23.200
<v Speaker 1>of business is that you know, we did a little better,

0:41:23.280 --> 0:41:25.759
<v Speaker 1>but not much than just get our money back. And

0:41:25.800 --> 0:41:27.719
<v Speaker 1>so it made a lot of money, but it mainly

0:41:27.760 --> 0:41:31.680
<v Speaker 1>made money for Fox, uh, you know, the Fox Searchlight

0:41:31.719 --> 0:41:34.719
<v Speaker 1>movie studio. And that kind of taught me a lot

0:41:34.760 --> 0:41:38.360
<v Speaker 1>about the movie business, which is is controlled by gatekeepers.

0:41:38.440 --> 0:41:41.879
<v Speaker 1>There's a handful of studios and they really make all

0:41:41.920 --> 0:41:45.560
<v Speaker 1>the money. And you know, we as this sort of entrepreneur,

0:41:45.640 --> 0:41:48.399
<v Speaker 1>as the producer who took all the risk, this is

0:41:48.440 --> 0:41:53.000
<v Speaker 1>not really a reward for that risk, and um, you know,

0:41:53.120 --> 0:41:57.399
<v Speaker 1>very it's very different than the internet business, where you're

0:41:57.400 --> 0:41:59.879
<v Speaker 1>taking you're taking a similar kind of risk, very hard

0:42:00.120 --> 0:42:02.920
<v Speaker 1>execute you know, a huge chance of failure, but at

0:42:02.960 --> 0:42:06.439
<v Speaker 1>least when you hit it, there's a giant reward there.

0:42:06.680 --> 0:42:09.480
<v Speaker 1>And so that was a big lesson for me. And

0:42:09.680 --> 0:42:11.480
<v Speaker 1>on the heels of things for smoking, that's what I

0:42:11.480 --> 0:42:14.959
<v Speaker 1>actually created yammer is. I was like, well, look I'm

0:42:14.960 --> 0:42:17.440
<v Speaker 1>gonna do something super risky. At least I want to

0:42:17.480 --> 0:42:19.759
<v Speaker 1>be in a position to get rewarded for it if

0:42:19.800 --> 0:42:23.160
<v Speaker 1>it works. Fox Sports Radio has the best sports talk

0:42:23.200 --> 0:42:25.920
<v Speaker 1>lineup in the nation. Catch all of our shows at

0:42:25.960 --> 0:42:29.279
<v Speaker 1>Fox sports Radio dot com and within the I Heart

0:42:29.400 --> 0:42:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Radio app. Search f s R to listen live. So

0:42:33.280 --> 0:42:36.120
<v Speaker 1>let's talk big picture. Now, you've been in Silicon Valley

0:42:36.160 --> 0:42:37.680
<v Speaker 1>for a long time. And by the way, that's fascinating.

0:42:37.680 --> 0:42:39.800
<v Speaker 1>Do you think you'll ever fund any other movies? Maybe

0:42:39.800 --> 0:42:42.680
<v Speaker 1>because you're just so committed to the idea that it's

0:42:42.680 --> 0:42:45.600
<v Speaker 1>getting out there, um, as opposed to the you know,

0:42:45.719 --> 0:42:50.279
<v Speaker 1>remunerative return that you might be able to recoup. Yes,

0:42:50.400 --> 0:42:51.560
<v Speaker 1>And I think that's the way you have to look

0:42:51.560 --> 0:42:53.960
<v Speaker 1>at it. I actually have another movie that's um in

0:42:54.000 --> 0:42:56.960
<v Speaker 1>the can, so to speak. Um. It's called dolly Land.

0:42:57.040 --> 0:43:00.920
<v Speaker 1>It's a movie about the painter salvad Or Dolly Ben Kingsley,

0:43:01.080 --> 0:43:05.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, the multi Academy Award winner plays Dolly. It's

0:43:05.239 --> 0:43:07.399
<v Speaker 1>directed by a great director named Mary Here and it's

0:43:07.440 --> 0:43:11.359
<v Speaker 1>actually done. We made it as an independent movie over

0:43:11.400 --> 0:43:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the past year and we're taking it too film festivals

0:43:14.520 --> 0:43:18.360
<v Speaker 1>later this year. And I think we've been accepted to

0:43:18.719 --> 0:43:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Toronto Film Festival, and there's a couple others we're looking at.

0:43:21.680 --> 0:43:24.080
<v Speaker 1>So it's exciting. I mean, we're gonna take to the

0:43:24.080 --> 0:43:28.040
<v Speaker 1>Film Festival and try to sell it and see what happens. Um,

0:43:28.080 --> 0:43:31.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, I hope it makes money. But you know,

0:43:31.480 --> 0:43:33.719
<v Speaker 1>I've I've gotten used to the idea that, you know,

0:43:33.760 --> 0:43:35.640
<v Speaker 1>it's very, very hard to make money in the movie business.

0:43:35.680 --> 0:43:37.680
<v Speaker 1>It's not why I do it. I do it because

0:43:37.840 --> 0:43:40.799
<v Speaker 1>I love movies and I like the subject matter, and um,

0:43:40.840 --> 0:43:44.200
<v Speaker 1>it's a passion project for everyone who's involved. So so yeah,

0:43:44.239 --> 0:43:47.120
<v Speaker 1>I you know, I'm still sort of interest in the

0:43:47.160 --> 0:43:49.560
<v Speaker 1>movie business and do it. But it's you obvious see

0:43:49.560 --> 0:43:51.440
<v Speaker 1>it as a hobby or you're going to be disappointed.

0:43:51.480 --> 0:43:55.360
<v Speaker 1>I think our actors harder to manage than other employees.

0:43:57.320 --> 0:44:00.560
<v Speaker 1>It's case by case. Um, most of them are very

0:44:00.560 --> 0:44:03.200
<v Speaker 1>professional and are a delight to work with, and then

0:44:03.520 --> 0:44:06.279
<v Speaker 1>you have a handful who are known as difficult. But

0:44:06.400 --> 0:44:09.440
<v Speaker 1>to be honest, UM, the ones who are difficult, they

0:44:09.600 --> 0:44:11.640
<v Speaker 1>don't last that long. I mean there's a kind of

0:44:11.680 --> 0:44:15.280
<v Speaker 1>old uh saying in Hollywood is a life's too short list.

0:44:15.480 --> 0:44:17.640
<v Speaker 1>And if you're an actor, you really don't want to

0:44:17.640 --> 0:44:21.920
<v Speaker 1>get on the lots too short lists? Are you? We're

0:44:21.920 --> 0:44:25.279
<v Speaker 1>talking to David David Sacks about wins and losses in

0:44:25.400 --> 0:44:28.640
<v Speaker 1>his career across a variety of fields. All right, let's

0:44:28.640 --> 0:44:32.480
<v Speaker 1>talk um, big picture here on tech. One reason I'm

0:44:32.520 --> 0:44:34.359
<v Speaker 1>so excited to talk to you and I appreciate all

0:44:34.360 --> 0:44:37.719
<v Speaker 1>the time you've given us, is for what I do, UM,

0:44:37.760 --> 0:44:40.319
<v Speaker 1>and I testified in Congress about this, uh, in front

0:44:40.360 --> 0:44:44.080
<v Speaker 1>of the House Judiciary Subcommittee. I can see the power

0:44:44.640 --> 0:44:47.879
<v Speaker 1>of Facebook for what they can do. I can see

0:44:47.880 --> 0:44:50.680
<v Speaker 1>the power of Twitter just for the content that we

0:44:50.760 --> 0:44:53.240
<v Speaker 1>created OutKick. You know, I can go in and look

0:44:53.680 --> 0:44:57.360
<v Speaker 1>at the charts and tell you basically, hey, the algorithm

0:44:57.440 --> 0:45:00.440
<v Speaker 1>is favoring us today or this month. Hey, they decided

0:45:00.480 --> 0:45:02.920
<v Speaker 1>they don't like what we're writing, and they are writing

0:45:03.040 --> 0:45:07.960
<v Speaker 1>us off of the algorithm page UM. And it seems,

0:45:08.080 --> 0:45:11.640
<v Speaker 1>based on my experience, that the bias always runs against

0:45:11.800 --> 0:45:14.920
<v Speaker 1>us whenever we write something favorable. I'll give you an example.

0:45:15.560 --> 0:45:17.600
<v Speaker 1>When we had Donald Trump on for the first time

0:45:17.640 --> 0:45:20.040
<v Speaker 1>on my sports talk radio show. We wrote a bunch

0:45:20.040 --> 0:45:23.560
<v Speaker 1>of articles about it at OutKick. Our traffic basically vanished

0:45:23.600 --> 0:45:27.279
<v Speaker 1>on social media literally within a day. Or two of

0:45:27.360 --> 0:45:29.919
<v Speaker 1>all of those articles, and it was Trump primarily talking

0:45:29.960 --> 0:45:33.200
<v Speaker 1>about sports going up on OutKick. It was clear that

0:45:33.239 --> 0:45:35.680
<v Speaker 1>we have been flagged in some way. Certainly the same

0:45:35.719 --> 0:45:37.719
<v Speaker 1>thing has happened when we wrote about masks or we

0:45:37.760 --> 0:45:41.839
<v Speaker 1>wrote about covid um. From a business perspective, not from

0:45:41.840 --> 0:45:46.359
<v Speaker 1>a political perspective. Does that make sense that they would

0:45:46.400 --> 0:45:48.879
<v Speaker 1>be behaving, these big tech companies, and I'm talking about

0:45:48.880 --> 0:45:53.480
<v Speaker 1>OutKick specifically in a way that clearly is discriminatory in

0:45:53.600 --> 0:45:57.439
<v Speaker 1>terms of the distribution of articles from sites like mine.

0:45:57.560 --> 0:45:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Does that make sense to you from a not from

0:45:59.440 --> 0:46:02.520
<v Speaker 1>a you know what's better for the country perspective? Does

0:46:02.520 --> 0:46:06.120
<v Speaker 1>it make sense from a business perspective? No, I don't

0:46:06.160 --> 0:46:09.000
<v Speaker 1>think so. I mean, I think they're doing it because

0:46:09.200 --> 0:46:14.080
<v Speaker 1>for ideological reasons. And um, now what I think what

0:46:14.200 --> 0:46:17.840
<v Speaker 1>happens is they start with a business rationale that seems

0:46:17.840 --> 0:46:21.319
<v Speaker 1>to make sense. So for example, they will let's say

0:46:21.320 --> 0:46:25.279
<v Speaker 1>you're a social media site, and uh, you start with

0:46:25.320 --> 0:46:28.160
<v Speaker 1>the content moderation department, because there's a certain kinds of

0:46:28.200 --> 0:46:30.640
<v Speaker 1>content that just shouldn't beyond there. I mean, people threatening

0:46:30.760 --> 0:46:36.719
<v Speaker 1>violence or you know, harassing other users, or using profanity

0:46:36.800 --> 0:46:39.040
<v Speaker 1>or obscenity, and they don't want that to be part

0:46:39.040 --> 0:46:41.360
<v Speaker 1>of their social networks. So they create a content moderation

0:46:41.440 --> 0:46:44.600
<v Speaker 1>team to basically take down that stuff, and you know,

0:46:45.400 --> 0:46:47.279
<v Speaker 1>no one really has a problem with that. But then

0:46:47.320 --> 0:46:49.560
<v Speaker 1>the problem is that the people actually doing the content

0:46:49.600 --> 0:46:54.720
<v Speaker 1>moderation have an ideological bias and they start indulging that bias.

0:46:54.880 --> 0:46:57.400
<v Speaker 1>And the fact the matter is that if you're in

0:46:57.440 --> 0:47:01.920
<v Speaker 1>Silicon Valley, you know, the for failing orthodoxy is everyone

0:47:02.000 --> 0:47:05.279
<v Speaker 1>kind of drinks from the same monocultural sound. They all

0:47:05.320 --> 0:47:08.320
<v Speaker 1>have the same political views. This stuff has been pulled

0:47:08.360 --> 0:47:12.279
<v Speaker 1>many times and you can sit and so half the

0:47:12.320 --> 0:47:15.960
<v Speaker 1>time ton't even realize what they're doing when they indulge

0:47:16.000 --> 0:47:18.720
<v Speaker 1>in in this bias. But yeah, the bias absolutely creeps

0:47:18.760 --> 0:47:22.600
<v Speaker 1>in and then it starts to become official policy. Um.

0:47:22.640 --> 0:47:25.360
<v Speaker 1>I think something similar has happened that at Google, where

0:47:26.080 --> 0:47:29.480
<v Speaker 1>you know, you've got the search algorithm, and the search

0:47:29.520 --> 0:47:32.720
<v Speaker 1>algorithm might produce some results that seem offensive to people,

0:47:32.840 --> 0:47:36.680
<v Speaker 1>so they introduce, you know, what they call human interventions.

0:47:37.160 --> 0:47:39.920
<v Speaker 1>But then as soon as you allow humans the process,

0:47:39.960 --> 0:47:44.040
<v Speaker 1>they carry with them their preconceived biases and they start

0:47:44.120 --> 0:47:47.600
<v Speaker 1>indulging those biases, and the problem is that none of

0:47:47.680 --> 0:47:52.600
<v Speaker 1>us have any transparency into those decisions. And I think

0:47:52.840 --> 0:47:55.759
<v Speaker 1>we have a right to know when we're being down

0:47:55.880 --> 0:48:00.360
<v Speaker 1>ranked or the algorithms sort of supporting our content we

0:48:00.400 --> 0:48:02.600
<v Speaker 1>should ever right, or or we've been kicked off one

0:48:02.600 --> 0:48:06.120
<v Speaker 1>of these networks. There's no explanation that comes with us,

0:48:06.160 --> 0:48:09.200
<v Speaker 1>and I think we should have due process rights to

0:48:09.320 --> 0:48:13.759
<v Speaker 1>at least know why, to know when and why we've

0:48:13.760 --> 0:48:17.200
<v Speaker 1>been down ranked or downvoad or something like that. And

0:48:17.320 --> 0:48:20.120
<v Speaker 1>is that the idea behind the idea of an open

0:48:20.200 --> 0:48:24.920
<v Speaker 1>algorithm marketplace effectively so that we could go in and

0:48:24.920 --> 0:48:26.759
<v Speaker 1>I'm just using out kick as an example, which is

0:48:26.760 --> 0:48:30.600
<v Speaker 1>owned by Fox now. But when you're down ranked, if

0:48:30.680 --> 0:48:34.640
<v Speaker 1>you are a business that is reliant on advertising, that

0:48:34.680 --> 0:48:36.920
<v Speaker 1>can take money directly out of your pocket, and the

0:48:37.040 --> 0:48:40.359
<v Speaker 1>lesson that they are instructing to business owners is you

0:48:40.440 --> 0:48:43.120
<v Speaker 1>play games and share content that we want to be

0:48:43.239 --> 0:48:46.200
<v Speaker 1>shared or else. Right, there's an implicit threat from a

0:48:46.239 --> 0:48:50.319
<v Speaker 1>business perspective that is hanging over the algorithmic problems that

0:48:50.360 --> 0:48:54.000
<v Speaker 1>can arise. What's a solution? Not necessarily again from a

0:48:54.000 --> 0:48:57.480
<v Speaker 1>political perspective, but you just kind of kind of walked

0:48:57.520 --> 0:48:59.400
<v Speaker 1>through us if you were just trying to be as

0:48:59.400 --> 0:49:02.320
<v Speaker 1>open and trans parent as possible. Is it a public

0:49:02.320 --> 0:49:06.839
<v Speaker 1>algorithm so that everybody could see what results are occurring? Well,

0:49:06.880 --> 0:49:09.320
<v Speaker 1>this is what Elon has suggested with respect to Twitter,

0:49:09.360 --> 0:49:11.560
<v Speaker 1>as he says that he wants to open source the algorithm.

0:49:11.840 --> 0:49:14.000
<v Speaker 1>And so the idea is, yeah, you would be able

0:49:14.000 --> 0:49:17.080
<v Speaker 1>to see how the algorithm works, and if there's a

0:49:17.160 --> 0:49:20.480
<v Speaker 1>human intervention, you would know that. And so that does

0:49:20.560 --> 0:49:23.120
<v Speaker 1>give you, well, first of all, it gives you an

0:49:23.160 --> 0:49:27.080
<v Speaker 1>assurance that they're not putting their thumb on the scale

0:49:27.920 --> 0:49:32.279
<v Speaker 1>and discriminating against certain people because of their their viewpoints.

0:49:33.040 --> 0:49:35.279
<v Speaker 1>But also it would give you some due process to

0:49:35.400 --> 0:49:37.839
<v Speaker 1>know that when there's an intervention against you, at least

0:49:37.840 --> 0:49:41.040
<v Speaker 1>know what's happened. Um. So that that's that's why Elan

0:49:41.080 --> 0:49:45.360
<v Speaker 1>has been pushing that idea of of open sourcing the algorithm. Um.

0:49:45.400 --> 0:49:47.399
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a great idea. I mean, we need

0:49:47.440 --> 0:49:50.960
<v Speaker 1>more transparency around the decision these big tech companies are

0:49:51.000 --> 0:49:54.319
<v Speaker 1>making because frankly, they have enormous power. I mean, by

0:49:54.360 --> 0:49:57.720
<v Speaker 1>and large, they are monopolies and they controlled the public square.

0:49:58.000 --> 0:50:01.000
<v Speaker 1>The public square has been privatized. Um. You know when

0:50:01.000 --> 0:50:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the founders at the trainers in the Constitution started the country,

0:50:05.320 --> 0:50:07.319
<v Speaker 1>the town square was a place you would go to

0:50:07.760 --> 0:50:09.600
<v Speaker 1>it like the courthouse steps, and you pull out of

0:50:09.600 --> 0:50:12.360
<v Speaker 1>soapbox and could talk and people gather around to listen.

0:50:12.400 --> 0:50:15.040
<v Speaker 1>That's what the town square meant today. The town square.

0:50:15.040 --> 0:50:17.320
<v Speaker 1>All these giants social networks. I mean, that is where

0:50:17.600 --> 0:50:21.720
<v Speaker 1>people assemble, that is where political speech occurs. And yet

0:50:22.000 --> 0:50:25.799
<v Speaker 1>there are no limitations on their ability to you know,

0:50:25.880 --> 0:50:28.160
<v Speaker 1>to d platform you or discriminate against you. And they

0:50:28.200 --> 0:50:31.319
<v Speaker 1>don't even they're not even obligated to provide any transparency

0:50:31.360 --> 0:50:33.960
<v Speaker 1>around that. And so I think we need more to

0:50:34.239 --> 0:50:40.320
<v Speaker 1>process on these big monopolistic companies when they restrict our speech.

0:50:41.400 --> 0:50:43.440
<v Speaker 1>I'll give you an example. By the way, Google News

0:50:43.520 --> 0:50:47.120
<v Speaker 1>obviously drives a lot of traffic. Um No, people out

0:50:47.120 --> 0:50:50.080
<v Speaker 1>there may not realize it, but Google News is wildly influential.

0:50:50.920 --> 0:50:53.839
<v Speaker 1>When Fox bought out Kick, they went back through all

0:50:53.840 --> 0:50:56.360
<v Speaker 1>these social media relationships and I've been saying for a

0:50:56.360 --> 0:50:59.280
<v Speaker 1>long time, yeah, we're registered with Google News, but never

0:50:59.400 --> 0:51:02.239
<v Speaker 1>our store. He's come up even stories where we might

0:51:02.320 --> 0:51:05.560
<v Speaker 1>break news other people right will show up on the

0:51:05.560 --> 0:51:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Google News alerts. We won't. Fox did a deep dive

0:51:08.600 --> 0:51:10.959
<v Speaker 1>and they said, oh, you've been mischaracterized, and you hadn't

0:51:10.960 --> 0:51:14.320
<v Speaker 1>been showing up in Google news for years. It's amazing

0:51:14.400 --> 0:51:18.520
<v Speaker 1>how often the mischaracterization seems to only run one way, right,

0:51:18.600 --> 0:51:22.440
<v Speaker 1>like uh, and and so I'm incredibly skeptical that at

0:51:22.480 --> 0:51:26.480
<v Speaker 1>some point someone at Google wasn't it was you know, unhappy,

0:51:26.560 --> 0:51:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and they just decided, Hey, I'm gonna move the OutKick

0:51:29.520 --> 0:51:32.920
<v Speaker 1>algorithm you know, feeder or whatever over into this little

0:51:32.920 --> 0:51:35.799
<v Speaker 1>box where it will kind of disappear. Um. And if

0:51:35.840 --> 0:51:39.319
<v Speaker 1>you're a independent business, you don't have the resources or

0:51:39.360 --> 0:51:44.160
<v Speaker 1>the relationships to even get things like that rectified. And uh.

0:51:44.200 --> 0:51:46.160
<v Speaker 1>And that's why I think the idea that Ellen is

0:51:46.160 --> 0:51:50.120
<v Speaker 1>trying to put in place could be so potentially influential,

0:51:50.480 --> 0:51:53.880
<v Speaker 1>which is just, hey, we're gonna have content neutral policies

0:51:54.080 --> 0:51:56.359
<v Speaker 1>and people will have optics on things. And and David,

0:51:56.360 --> 0:51:57.799
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you paid attention to it. I'm

0:51:57.800 --> 0:52:00.520
<v Speaker 1>sure you did. But you know, the day that Ellen

0:52:00.560 --> 0:52:04.959
<v Speaker 1>announces that he's reached acquisition terms, suddenly my Twitter feed

0:52:05.040 --> 0:52:07.960
<v Speaker 1>comes alive and I'm adding tens of thousands of followers

0:52:08.040 --> 0:52:10.840
<v Speaker 1>at a rapid rate. It's hard for me to believe

0:52:10.920 --> 0:52:13.640
<v Speaker 1>that in some way Twitter is not trying to bury

0:52:13.680 --> 0:52:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the evidence of what they've been doing. So when neutral

0:52:17.440 --> 0:52:20.120
<v Speaker 1>engineers come back and start to look at the algorithms

0:52:20.120 --> 0:52:23.840
<v Speaker 1>they have in place, there's not necessarily the same evidence

0:52:23.880 --> 0:52:26.080
<v Speaker 1>that there would have been if somebody like Elon weren't

0:52:26.120 --> 0:52:30.040
<v Speaker 1>acquiring the company. It's gonna be really interesting to see

0:52:30.120 --> 0:52:32.439
<v Speaker 1>what happens if Elon is able to close this deal.

0:52:32.520 --> 0:52:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I guess they're still still up in the air with

0:52:34.320 --> 0:52:36.520
<v Speaker 1>us going to happen, but it'll be really interesting to

0:52:36.520 --> 0:52:40.320
<v Speaker 1>see what comes out after he acquires the company because

0:52:40.440 --> 0:52:44.480
<v Speaker 1>we just don't have any visibility into how they moderate

0:52:44.680 --> 0:52:49.000
<v Speaker 1>content or upfold or down rank content, how the algorithm

0:52:49.000 --> 0:52:53.200
<v Speaker 1>works with them. Again, the manual trending topics is wildly influential,

0:52:53.239 --> 0:52:55.680
<v Speaker 1>and I think that's a total cesspool. By the way,

0:52:55.680 --> 0:52:58.360
<v Speaker 1>for somebody who does what I do. Uh, they decide

0:52:58.400 --> 0:53:01.120
<v Speaker 1>what trends, they decide how they are going to characterize

0:53:01.120 --> 0:53:05.200
<v Speaker 1>what trends in a positive or negative fashion. Um, it's

0:53:05.320 --> 0:53:08.799
<v Speaker 1>just such a rigged game. And do you think that one?

0:53:09.239 --> 0:53:12.440
<v Speaker 1>See my theory is one unrigged game, right. So if

0:53:12.480 --> 0:53:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Elon is able to acquire h Test, sorry, acquire Twitter,

0:53:16.920 --> 0:53:20.200
<v Speaker 1>what I think would happen is if there are wildly

0:53:20.280 --> 0:53:23.759
<v Speaker 1>divergent results that suddenly start to happen at Twitter, and

0:53:23.800 --> 0:53:25.920
<v Speaker 1>we can see a discrepancy between what's going on on

0:53:25.920 --> 0:53:28.200
<v Speaker 1>Twitter and what's going on on Facebook and what's going

0:53:28.200 --> 0:53:30.920
<v Speaker 1>on on Instagram and all these different social media outlets,

0:53:31.600 --> 0:53:34.200
<v Speaker 1>then it puts a lot of pressure on these other

0:53:34.320 --> 0:53:38.080
<v Speaker 1>companies to also be honest and transparent about what they're doing.

0:53:38.320 --> 0:53:41.400
<v Speaker 1>Is there a logic to that, based on your knowledge

0:53:41.440 --> 0:53:44.279
<v Speaker 1>of how tech companies work, that that could occur, that

0:53:44.280 --> 0:53:48.840
<v Speaker 1>that influence could become substantial. I think so, because Ellen,

0:53:49.080 --> 0:53:51.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is what's so important about what Elon

0:53:51.160 --> 0:53:53.200
<v Speaker 1>is doing is that he's drawing a line in the

0:53:53.239 --> 0:53:56.360
<v Speaker 1>sand here and he's opposing censorship, and he's also setting

0:53:56.360 --> 0:53:59.000
<v Speaker 1>an example for all these other companies. One of the

0:53:59.640 --> 0:54:03.319
<v Speaker 1>things about the censorship that's taken place that's so discouraging

0:54:03.440 --> 0:54:05.240
<v Speaker 1>is the way that it all seems to be done

0:54:05.800 --> 0:54:09.359
<v Speaker 1>in unison. So when Trump was sent off Twitter back

0:54:09.400 --> 0:54:11.920
<v Speaker 1>in January, they all did it. Every site did it

0:54:12.320 --> 0:54:15.360
<v Speaker 1>within days of that decision. So they all seem to

0:54:15.360 --> 0:54:18.160
<v Speaker 1>be acting in concert, in lockstep. I've called it a

0:54:18.200 --> 0:54:21.240
<v Speaker 1>speech cartel. If they were getting together for the purpose

0:54:21.320 --> 0:54:24.960
<v Speaker 1>of fixing prices, let's say advertising prices, everybody would be

0:54:25.120 --> 0:54:27.040
<v Speaker 1>up in arms saying that's illegal. But if they get

0:54:27.080 --> 0:54:30.359
<v Speaker 1>together for the purpose of fixing speech and what you

0:54:30.400 --> 0:54:32.239
<v Speaker 1>can't say or what you can't which, by the way,

0:54:32.320 --> 0:54:34.720
<v Speaker 1>is so much more dangerous than from a from a

0:54:34.719 --> 0:54:39.719
<v Speaker 1>democracy perspective than fixing advertising costs. Absolutely. I mean, look

0:54:39.800 --> 0:54:43.120
<v Speaker 1>at the employees of these companies have enormous power over

0:54:43.400 --> 0:54:46.680
<v Speaker 1>our public discourse and public debate. They were never elected

0:54:47.000 --> 0:54:50.239
<v Speaker 1>to have that power. And back twenty years ago when

0:54:50.280 --> 0:54:53.040
<v Speaker 1>I was doing Internet stuff, we never believe when we

0:54:53.040 --> 0:54:55.560
<v Speaker 1>were creating these platforms, we never believed it was our

0:54:55.640 --> 0:54:58.560
<v Speaker 1>job to put our thumb on the scale and prefer

0:54:58.640 --> 0:55:01.239
<v Speaker 1>certain views over others. We just thought it was our

0:55:01.320 --> 0:55:04.479
<v Speaker 1>job to let the users communicate with each other. And

0:55:04.600 --> 0:55:08.440
<v Speaker 1>somehow that mission changed, And now the employees these companies

0:55:08.640 --> 0:55:13.120
<v Speaker 1>have gone from being umpires to basically being participants, to

0:55:13.239 --> 0:55:17.560
<v Speaker 1>being partisans in the marketplace of ideas. And I think

0:55:17.640 --> 0:55:21.200
<v Speaker 1>what you hear from Elan is listen, I'm a moderate.

0:55:21.239 --> 0:55:23.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to restore the balance. I'm gonna let the

0:55:23.880 --> 0:55:26.839
<v Speaker 1>users communicate the way that they want to. I'm gonna

0:55:26.880 --> 0:55:31.520
<v Speaker 1>be nonpartisan. I'm going to be a fair referee, and

0:55:31.640 --> 0:55:34.279
<v Speaker 1>that's what's so powerful about what he's doing, and hope

0:55:34.280 --> 0:55:37.799
<v Speaker 1>it will set an example for these other companies you

0:55:37.840 --> 0:55:40.759
<v Speaker 1>mentioned dolly Land, which I'll be interested to see as

0:55:40.800 --> 0:55:43.600
<v Speaker 1>well as a passion project. It's not necessarily being done

0:55:43.640 --> 0:55:46.319
<v Speaker 1>to make money. One of the arguments that I've made

0:55:46.360 --> 0:55:48.680
<v Speaker 1>for a while. And maybe Ellen is doing this, I'm

0:55:48.680 --> 0:55:53.160
<v Speaker 1>curious if you think he's doing it is in the

0:55:53.239 --> 0:55:56.279
<v Speaker 1>passion project being brought to bear. In the world of

0:55:56.400 --> 0:56:00.200
<v Speaker 1>larger media, I think, to a large extent me media

0:56:00.239 --> 0:56:02.319
<v Speaker 1>in the United States is broken. And what I mean

0:56:02.360 --> 0:56:05.400
<v Speaker 1>by that is you've got the CNNs, the msnbc S,

0:56:05.400 --> 0:56:08.920
<v Speaker 1>the New York Times, the Washington Post, and their narrative

0:56:08.960 --> 0:56:13.040
<v Speaker 1>bias to me is so clear, and you have one alternative,

0:56:13.160 --> 0:56:16.480
<v Speaker 1>which is basically Rupert Murdoch and Fox. In fact, if

0:56:16.560 --> 0:56:21.000
<v Speaker 1>Rupert Murdoch didn't exist, there would be almost no It's

0:56:21.040 --> 0:56:23.920
<v Speaker 1>crazy to think about, but there would be almost no

0:56:24.480 --> 0:56:28.440
<v Speaker 1>full fruition of media outlets in the country. Right. It's

0:56:28.480 --> 0:56:31.640
<v Speaker 1>basically one man and his family who said, Hey, we're

0:56:31.640 --> 0:56:33.640
<v Speaker 1>gonna create Fox News, and we're gonna buy the Wall

0:56:33.680 --> 0:56:35.759
<v Speaker 1>Street Journal and we'll run the New York Post and

0:56:35.960 --> 0:56:37.920
<v Speaker 1>now they bought out kick and they have these different

0:56:37.960 --> 0:56:41.520
<v Speaker 1>assets that are trying to fight back a battle, not necessarily,

0:56:41.520 --> 0:56:44.040
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, on a right wing basis, but just

0:56:44.280 --> 0:56:47.040
<v Speaker 1>for the seventy of the country that isn't gone insane.

0:56:47.760 --> 0:56:50.640
<v Speaker 1>It feels like to some extent there is an opportunity

0:56:50.719 --> 0:56:53.600
<v Speaker 1>for passion projects and media which may not return a

0:56:53.600 --> 0:56:57.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of money, but do have massive influence. Do you

0:56:57.160 --> 0:56:59.640
<v Speaker 1>think that's what Ellen is doing with Twitter? Is it

0:56:59.800 --> 0:57:02.479
<v Speaker 1>his passion project? Is it a version of dolly Land

0:57:02.520 --> 0:57:04.560
<v Speaker 1>for him? Or do you think he's looking at it

0:57:04.600 --> 0:57:07.719
<v Speaker 1>as a big money maker. I think, first and foremost,

0:57:07.760 --> 0:57:09.759
<v Speaker 1>like you said, it's a passion project. I think that

0:57:09.840 --> 0:57:11.879
<v Speaker 1>this is about the principle of free speech for him.

0:57:11.920 --> 0:57:14.360
<v Speaker 1>When he says that he's going to restore Twitter to

0:57:14.440 --> 0:57:18.320
<v Speaker 1>being an open town square, that really is his main motivation.

0:57:18.520 --> 0:57:21.360
<v Speaker 1>And it always starts with the mission for him. I

0:57:21.360 --> 0:57:23.800
<v Speaker 1>think he's got enough money, you wouldn't just be doing

0:57:23.800 --> 0:57:27.280
<v Speaker 1>this as a business deal. Now. The history of Elon's

0:57:27.320 --> 0:57:31.680
<v Speaker 1>ventures is that he starts with the mission and you know,

0:57:31.760 --> 0:57:34.040
<v Speaker 1>the passion project, as you say, but over time he

0:57:34.080 --> 0:57:36.320
<v Speaker 1>figures out how to make them a great business certainly

0:57:36.360 --> 0:57:39.160
<v Speaker 1>that's the case with Tesla. The passion project there was

0:57:39.200 --> 0:57:41.880
<v Speaker 1>to move the world to sustainable energy. So but in

0:57:41.920 --> 0:57:44.000
<v Speaker 1>the process of doing that, he's created the world's best

0:57:44.040 --> 0:57:47.120
<v Speaker 1>car with SpaceX. He wants to get people of the Mars.

0:57:47.160 --> 0:57:49.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that really is the mission. But in the

0:57:49.400 --> 0:57:52.040
<v Speaker 1>process of doing that, he's figured out, you know, Starlink

0:57:52.040 --> 0:57:55.440
<v Speaker 1>and how to make that a great business. Um so

0:57:55.520 --> 0:57:58.400
<v Speaker 1>I think he will figure out how to make Twitter

0:57:58.480 --> 0:58:00.320
<v Speaker 1>into a great business. But I have no doubt that

0:58:00.320 --> 0:58:05.080
<v Speaker 1>it's all about the passion rim politics. Obviously, you're involved

0:58:05.120 --> 0:58:09.280
<v Speaker 1>in donating money. What's the best thing that national politics

0:58:09.320 --> 0:58:14.120
<v Speaker 1>could do in your mind to advance American business interests?

0:58:14.440 --> 0:58:16.840
<v Speaker 1>How much like the Biden administration to me is just

0:58:16.880 --> 0:58:20.120
<v Speaker 1>a disaster in all respects. But a lot of politicians,

0:58:20.200 --> 0:58:22.080
<v Speaker 1>it seems to me the best outcome would just be

0:58:22.120 --> 0:58:26.800
<v Speaker 1>don't do anything. Unfortunately, because of where we are, what

0:58:26.920 --> 0:58:31.480
<v Speaker 1>can and should America be doing to advance entrepreneurial and

0:58:31.560 --> 0:58:37.080
<v Speaker 1>capitalistic interests so that we maintain uh leadership in risk

0:58:37.120 --> 0:58:42.600
<v Speaker 1>taking around the world. Well, the the entrepreneurial energy in

0:58:42.640 --> 0:58:47.240
<v Speaker 1>America is strong. I mean, this is historically our great advantage.

0:58:47.400 --> 0:58:51.280
<v Speaker 1>It's our d n a right our cultural DNA exactly.

0:58:51.320 --> 0:58:53.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean Americans are willing to take risks, are not

0:58:54.000 --> 0:58:56.880
<v Speaker 1>afraid of failure. If they do fail, they kind of

0:58:57.480 --> 0:59:01.400
<v Speaker 1>dust themselves off and try again. There's the huge stigma

0:59:01.480 --> 0:59:03.680
<v Speaker 1>in our culture the way there is in Europe. If

0:59:03.680 --> 0:59:07.600
<v Speaker 1>you fail and you got vcs people like us who

0:59:07.600 --> 0:59:10.160
<v Speaker 1>are willing to write a check and if it's a zero,

0:59:10.320 --> 0:59:12.520
<v Speaker 1>so be it. We're not going to come break your

0:59:12.560 --> 0:59:15.600
<v Speaker 1>kneecaps or even be too upset about it. You just

0:59:15.640 --> 0:59:18.600
<v Speaker 1>don't have that mentality in other parts of the world.

0:59:18.760 --> 0:59:21.440
<v Speaker 1>So that's what's strong there. And I think what you

0:59:21.520 --> 0:59:25.800
<v Speaker 1>need from government is to create a stable environment with

0:59:25.920 --> 0:59:30.120
<v Speaker 1>sound money and low taxes and reasonable spending levels just

0:59:30.280 --> 0:59:33.040
<v Speaker 1>to not break the golden goose. And you know the

0:59:33.040 --> 0:59:35.760
<v Speaker 1>prominent washing right now is they're really threatened to break

0:59:35.800 --> 0:59:38.920
<v Speaker 1>the golden goose. I mean inflations out of control as

0:59:38.960 --> 0:59:42.680
<v Speaker 1>a result of this hyper spending um and the money printing.

0:59:42.840 --> 0:59:45.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you had the FED and if you were

0:59:45.440 --> 0:59:47.520
<v Speaker 1>running so sorry to cut off that, you're exactly right

0:59:47.560 --> 0:59:49.320
<v Speaker 1>on this. If you're a business guy, you have to

0:59:49.360 --> 0:59:52.520
<v Speaker 1>make a profit in order to that's how capitalism works.

0:59:53.000 --> 0:59:56.200
<v Speaker 1>If you were running the government, and you saw the

0:59:56.240 --> 0:59:59.440
<v Speaker 1>books that the government is putting out on a yearly basis.

1:00:00.520 --> 1:00:03.920
<v Speaker 1>I mean, obviously the business would go bankrupt with the

1:00:03.960 --> 1:00:07.360
<v Speaker 1>books that the government is putting out right now, how

1:00:07.360 --> 1:00:10.200
<v Speaker 1>long can this continue? You know, modern modern monetary theory,

1:00:10.240 --> 1:00:12.040
<v Speaker 1>the idea was, Hey, we can print as much money

1:00:12.080 --> 1:00:15.240
<v Speaker 1>as we want, there's no consequences. We're seeing consequences. We've

1:00:15.240 --> 1:00:18.440
<v Speaker 1>got a thirty trillion dollar national debt now and we

1:00:18.560 --> 1:00:21.640
<v Speaker 1>basically added twenty trillion dollars in the last you know,

1:00:21.920 --> 1:00:25.840
<v Speaker 1>ten twelve years. When you look from a business perspective

1:00:25.840 --> 1:00:29.439
<v Speaker 1>at the nation's books, where are we in and how

1:00:29.480 --> 1:00:33.360
<v Speaker 1>troubled would you be? Purely from a business perspective on that,

1:00:34.280 --> 1:00:38.360
<v Speaker 1>I think it's terrifying. We owe something like a GDP now,

1:00:38.400 --> 1:00:42.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean we basically, oh more than the entire amount

1:00:42.200 --> 1:00:44.840
<v Speaker 1>of the output of our economy in our national debt,

1:00:45.000 --> 1:00:47.800
<v Speaker 1>and what do we get all of that debt um?

1:00:47.880 --> 1:00:49.840
<v Speaker 1>So it's it's really pretty scary. And I agree with

1:00:49.840 --> 1:00:52.600
<v Speaker 1>you about m m T. I mean, that's the latest

1:00:52.680 --> 1:00:55.120
<v Speaker 1>group of so called experts that I think are gonna

1:00:55.120 --> 1:00:58.680
<v Speaker 1>be massively discredited. Uh. They claimed for years that we

1:00:58.680 --> 1:01:00.560
<v Speaker 1>can print as much money as we want and spend

1:01:00.560 --> 1:01:02.440
<v Speaker 1>as much you want, because I guess we were the

1:01:02.440 --> 1:01:05.240
<v Speaker 1>world's reserve currency. That be no price to pay for that.

1:01:05.640 --> 1:01:07.920
<v Speaker 1>And it's true that interest rates stayed low for a

1:01:07.960 --> 1:01:10.720
<v Speaker 1>long time, but now they've rocked it up, and inflation

1:01:10.760 --> 1:01:13.760
<v Speaker 1>has rocketed it up, and you're seeing it. Ordinary Americans

1:01:13.760 --> 1:01:16.000
<v Speaker 1>feel a lot poorer because their wages is not kept

1:01:16.040 --> 1:01:18.400
<v Speaker 1>up with inflation. And we've had a stock market crash

1:01:18.480 --> 1:01:20.920
<v Speaker 1>because now the stock market is starting to price in,

1:01:21.480 --> 1:01:23.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, much higher interest rates that are gonna be

1:01:23.840 --> 1:01:28.600
<v Speaker 1>necessary to tame the inflation. So it was just very irresponsible. Um.

1:01:28.640 --> 1:01:30.840
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's the fun at a law that you

1:01:30.960 --> 1:01:34.280
<v Speaker 1>cannot spend more than you make, not for very long

1:01:34.960 --> 1:01:38.040
<v Speaker 1>and um yeah, we just need fiscal sanity to return

1:01:38.080 --> 1:01:42.000
<v Speaker 1>to Washington. You mentioned experts, uh, And I appreciate your time,

1:01:42.080 --> 1:01:44.640
<v Speaker 1>and I know how busy you are. To me, one

1:01:44.680 --> 1:01:47.760
<v Speaker 1>of the great lessons of the past several years has

1:01:47.800 --> 1:01:51.440
<v Speaker 1>been how wrong experts can be. The experts who told

1:01:51.440 --> 1:01:54.680
<v Speaker 1>this modern monetary theory there were going to be no consequences,

1:01:54.680 --> 1:01:58.720
<v Speaker 1>certainly the experts surrounding so much of COVID. Uh. One

1:01:58.720 --> 1:02:01.480
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons why I love capitalism is you really

1:02:01.480 --> 1:02:03.040
<v Speaker 1>do have to put your money where your mouth is,

1:02:03.280 --> 1:02:07.160
<v Speaker 1>and you have to place bets based on things like logic,

1:02:07.280 --> 1:02:11.560
<v Speaker 1>based on numbers. Um, where are we in the field

1:02:11.600 --> 1:02:14.800
<v Speaker 1>of so called experts right now? Were you someone who

1:02:14.840 --> 1:02:18.440
<v Speaker 1>believed I think probably the answer is no. On conventional

1:02:18.480 --> 1:02:21.720
<v Speaker 1>wisdom in the first place, which is a business opportunity

1:02:21.800 --> 1:02:25.440
<v Speaker 1>is really about recognizing that the conventional wisdom is wrong oftentimes,

1:02:25.520 --> 1:02:28.919
<v Speaker 1>or else everybody would be doing what you're doing isn't

1:02:29.320 --> 1:02:32.200
<v Speaker 1>isn't what you do basically the exact opposite of what

1:02:32.320 --> 1:02:36.120
<v Speaker 1>experts do. Yes, because if you listen to the experts

1:02:36.120 --> 1:02:39.200
<v Speaker 1>with respect to any business opportunity, they will always tell

1:02:39.200 --> 1:02:41.680
<v Speaker 1>you us a bad idea that because yes, they are

1:02:41.880 --> 1:02:44.440
<v Speaker 1>fully ingrained in the old way of doing things and

1:02:44.520 --> 1:02:47.640
<v Speaker 1>they they don't have the imagination to see that things

1:02:47.640 --> 1:02:49.919
<v Speaker 1>could be done in a completely different way. I mean, look,

1:02:49.960 --> 1:02:52.200
<v Speaker 1>we would never have found it PayPal if we had

1:02:52.200 --> 1:02:56.760
<v Speaker 1>listened to all those payment experts back in and in fact,

1:02:56.880 --> 1:02:59.280
<v Speaker 1>part of the reason we created PayPal is because we

1:02:59.280 --> 1:03:01.640
<v Speaker 1>didn't know that much about payments. We weren't beholden to

1:03:01.680 --> 1:03:04.480
<v Speaker 1>the old way of doing things. So you're listening to

1:03:04.560 --> 1:03:08.960
<v Speaker 1>experts is something that really runs against the grain of

1:03:09.000 --> 1:03:13.720
<v Speaker 1>an entrepreneur. And this whole idea of listening to authority

1:03:13.760 --> 1:03:17.920
<v Speaker 1>because those people in power have some sort of credentials,

1:03:18.040 --> 1:03:21.040
<v Speaker 1>and that you should automatically listen to them and not

1:03:21.160 --> 1:03:24.720
<v Speaker 1>consult your own faculties, your own common sense. That's an

1:03:24.720 --> 1:03:27.480
<v Speaker 1>idea that I think is gonna be offensive to any entrepreneur.

1:03:27.920 --> 1:03:30.240
<v Speaker 1>And I think we've seen that now with politics over

1:03:30.240 --> 1:03:32.680
<v Speaker 1>the last couple of years. I mean, everything the experts

1:03:32.760 --> 1:03:36.720
<v Speaker 1>told us about COVID, for example, was just completely wrong.

1:03:37.400 --> 1:03:39.560
<v Speaker 1>And I mean we're told so many things and then

1:03:39.600 --> 1:03:42.240
<v Speaker 1>they also not not to be right. So you know,

1:03:42.840 --> 1:03:45.800
<v Speaker 1>having a healthy distrust of experts is a good idea

1:03:45.840 --> 1:03:49.480
<v Speaker 1>in business or politics. I think it's also the case

1:03:49.920 --> 1:03:53.080
<v Speaker 1>that everything that they told us and allowed us to

1:03:53.120 --> 1:03:56.800
<v Speaker 1>discuss on social media very often ended up being wrong.

1:03:56.960 --> 1:03:59.600
<v Speaker 1>And when I kind of diagnose it, I'm curious what

1:03:59.640 --> 1:04:01.640
<v Speaker 1>you think about this As we come to a close here.

1:04:01.680 --> 1:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>We've been talking with David Sachs. A lot of this

1:04:04.000 --> 1:04:08.360
<v Speaker 1>comes down to risk analysis. Many people are really really

1:04:08.400 --> 1:04:13.200
<v Speaker 1>bad at analyzing risk, both financial and personal. And it

1:04:13.320 --> 1:04:16.040
<v Speaker 1>seems to me that you talked about the American DNA,

1:04:16.120 --> 1:04:18.760
<v Speaker 1>and I agree with you is based on taking risk.

1:04:18.840 --> 1:04:20.680
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you don't get on a ship and decided

1:04:20.680 --> 1:04:22.440
<v Speaker 1>to come to a new land and then get in

1:04:22.440 --> 1:04:24.360
<v Speaker 1>a covered wagon and go all the way to the

1:04:24.360 --> 1:04:28.000
<v Speaker 1>west coast because you have a high if you don't

1:04:28.040 --> 1:04:31.000
<v Speaker 1>have a high risk tolerance. Right, it seems like our

1:04:31.120 --> 1:04:35.320
<v Speaker 1>national risk tolerance in a social media era is being

1:04:35.440 --> 1:04:39.000
<v Speaker 1>totally destroyed to the point where you saw all the

1:04:39.000 --> 1:04:40.760
<v Speaker 1>time in the early days of COVID, well, if it

1:04:40.800 --> 1:04:43.160
<v Speaker 1>saves just one life, well, if it saves just one life,

1:04:43.160 --> 1:04:46.120
<v Speaker 1>we would have never committed airplanes. We certainly wouldn't have

1:04:46.160 --> 1:04:49.440
<v Speaker 1>emitted cars. Um. How much of this is just a

1:04:49.480 --> 1:04:55.360
<v Speaker 1>failure to understand basic risk in both personal business and life. Yeah,

1:04:55.400 --> 1:04:57.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean I think I think you you saw this

1:04:57.200 --> 1:05:00.280
<v Speaker 1>during COVID as there was a total suspension of cost

1:05:00.320 --> 1:05:04.360
<v Speaker 1>benefit analysis in favor of this sort of zero COVID

1:05:04.480 --> 1:05:07.520
<v Speaker 1>thinking this idea that we can completely stamp out COVID,

1:05:07.560 --> 1:05:12.120
<v Speaker 1>which was just not possible, very clearly not possible, And

1:05:12.480 --> 1:05:16.400
<v Speaker 1>there was a total refusal to to to apply cost

1:05:16.440 --> 1:05:20.040
<v Speaker 1>benefits on any of these lockdowns. I mean, we I

1:05:20.040 --> 1:05:22.360
<v Speaker 1>think it's very clear now that that whole policy of

1:05:22.480 --> 1:05:26.440
<v Speaker 1>lockdowns it cratered the economy was devastating the economy, but

1:05:26.480 --> 1:05:29.240
<v Speaker 1>it didn't do anything to stop COVID. And no one

1:05:29.600 --> 1:05:32.320
<v Speaker 1>about the or the kids in school with the mass,

1:05:32.880 --> 1:05:35.280
<v Speaker 1>you know, and and the remote learning. I mean, we

1:05:35.400 --> 1:05:39.120
<v Speaker 1>lost an entire year of schooling for so many kids

1:05:39.120 --> 1:05:41.560
<v Speaker 1>in this country, and no one really thought to apply

1:05:41.640 --> 1:05:46.280
<v Speaker 1>cost benefit to that, you know, negligibile benefit if any,

1:05:46.360 --> 1:05:47.840
<v Speaker 1>and the costs I think we're gonna be feeling for

1:05:47.880 --> 1:05:51.320
<v Speaker 1>a generation. So yeah, we need to bring back benefit costs.

1:05:51.440 --> 1:05:53.280
<v Speaker 1>I think we have to bring back as assumption of risk.

1:05:53.520 --> 1:05:56.760
<v Speaker 1>You know that there's a tradition this country that you're

1:05:56.800 --> 1:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>allowed to do risky things. Uh, you know, if you're

1:06:00.680 --> 1:06:03.880
<v Speaker 1>willing to assume the risk. And and we saw this

1:06:04.000 --> 1:06:07.560
<v Speaker 1>workout I think very well in Florida, where they basically

1:06:07.560 --> 1:06:11.480
<v Speaker 1>got on with their lives so much more quickly the country, Um,

1:06:11.520 --> 1:06:14.000
<v Speaker 1>because they allowed people to make their own choices. And

1:06:14.040 --> 1:06:16.560
<v Speaker 1>if you wanted to go out to a restaurant and

1:06:16.680 --> 1:06:19.760
<v Speaker 1>risk get in COVID, that was your choice. Um. So

1:06:19.920 --> 1:06:22.479
<v Speaker 1>we've got to bring back these basic ideas. And I think,

1:06:23.200 --> 1:06:24.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, I don't know if it's just that the

1:06:24.360 --> 1:06:27.920
<v Speaker 1>media culture doesn't really get it but but you're allowed

1:06:27.920 --> 1:06:29.400
<v Speaker 1>to do whiskey things in this country. You know, if

1:06:29.400 --> 1:06:32.560
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't work out for you, that's your choice, such

1:06:32.600 --> 1:06:37.200
<v Speaker 1>as buying our ferrari. Alright, last question for you, uh uh,

1:06:37.840 --> 1:06:39.480
<v Speaker 1>what advice would you give. There's a lot of people

1:06:39.480 --> 1:06:42.000
<v Speaker 1>who are young that listen to these podcasts, this Wins

1:06:42.000 --> 1:06:46.520
<v Speaker 1>and Losses podcast because they're trying to build their own culture,

1:06:46.600 --> 1:06:50.560
<v Speaker 1>their own idea, their own worldview. For someone who wants

1:06:50.560 --> 1:06:53.520
<v Speaker 1>to get into business today, let's say that they are

1:06:53.560 --> 1:06:55.680
<v Speaker 1>out there and they're sixteen years old listening to this

1:06:55.840 --> 1:06:58.000
<v Speaker 1>right now, what do you wish you had known when

1:06:58.040 --> 1:07:00.480
<v Speaker 1>you were sixteen? What would you be telling young people

1:07:00.520 --> 1:07:04.000
<v Speaker 1>they need to be doing today to prepare themselves to

1:07:04.080 --> 1:07:06.680
<v Speaker 1>make the kinds of decisions that you had the opportunity

1:07:06.720 --> 1:07:10.040
<v Speaker 1>to make in your twenties, thirties and forties. I mean,

1:07:10.080 --> 1:07:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the main thing I would have done differently was just

1:07:12.960 --> 1:07:15.680
<v Speaker 1>get into business faster. Like we talked about, I kind

1:07:15.680 --> 1:07:18.440
<v Speaker 1>of I took some time and went to law school,

1:07:18.480 --> 1:07:20.920
<v Speaker 1>and UM, I just didn't know how to get into it.

1:07:21.040 --> 1:07:25.960
<v Speaker 1>And I think that what's great about UM entrepreneurialism today

1:07:26.240 --> 1:07:30.320
<v Speaker 1>is there's so many opportunities. There's incubators. Now there's young

1:07:30.360 --> 1:07:32.840
<v Speaker 1>startups you can join. I just would have gotten into

1:07:32.840 --> 1:07:35.760
<v Speaker 1>it a lot sooner, and so I still think going

1:07:35.800 --> 1:07:38.000
<v Speaker 1>to college is probably a good thing to do. I

1:07:38.000 --> 1:07:41.800
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't necessarily encourage anyone to drop out, although certainly a

1:07:41.800 --> 1:07:44.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of great entrepreneurs have had success dropping out, like Zuckerberg,

1:07:45.080 --> 1:07:48.280
<v Speaker 1>like Bill Gates, so on. But but I would say

1:07:48.320 --> 1:07:50.400
<v Speaker 1>just get into it as quickly as possible. What you

1:07:50.440 --> 1:07:54.760
<v Speaker 1>really want to do is go work at a startup

1:07:54.840 --> 1:07:57.640
<v Speaker 1>where you can really learn, where there's some great founders,

1:07:58.160 --> 1:08:00.920
<v Speaker 1>and it almost doesn't matter what's the job is that

1:08:00.960 --> 1:08:04.520
<v Speaker 1>you get. The important thing is who you're associated with.

1:08:04.760 --> 1:08:07.680
<v Speaker 1>And you know, I learned so much working with people

1:08:07.720 --> 1:08:10.920
<v Speaker 1>like Peter Till and Elon Musk at my first startup

1:08:10.920 --> 1:08:12.960
<v Speaker 1>at PayPal, and that enabled me to go on and

1:08:12.960 --> 1:08:17.000
<v Speaker 1>then found my own companies and become an investor. So

1:08:17.240 --> 1:08:19.960
<v Speaker 1>you really want to just work with the smartest people

1:08:20.000 --> 1:08:23.679
<v Speaker 1>you can possibly find and do that as quickly as possible.

1:08:24.360 --> 1:08:27.639
<v Speaker 1>Outstanding stuff, David Sachs. This has been a phenomenal discussion

1:08:27.680 --> 1:08:30.240
<v Speaker 1>wins and Losses with Clay Travis. I hope everybody enjoyed it.

1:08:30.320 --> 1:08:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Thank you guys, there's now forty seven of these, I believe,

1:08:33.120 --> 1:08:34.639
<v Speaker 1>so if you enjoyed this one, check out the other

1:08:34.640 --> 1:08:37.920
<v Speaker 1>forty six. Thank you, thank you, quite appreciate it.