WEBVTT - What's Wright - NBA Draft Recap: Cooper Flagg & Mavs CONTENDERS? Pelicans HORRENDOUS trade & more!

0:00:01.320 --> 0:00:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Welcome in. We'll Drive with Nick Wright episode three five

0:00:04.559 --> 0:00:07.440
<v Speaker 1>and this episode as always of What's Right with Nick Right,

0:00:07.440 --> 0:00:12.720
<v Speaker 1>as presented by our friends at boost Mobile. This is

0:00:12.800 --> 0:00:16.599
<v Speaker 1>our last show until after the fourth of July. I

0:00:16.640 --> 0:00:19.040
<v Speaker 1>will leave from here to go do the TV show

0:00:19.160 --> 0:00:23.400
<v Speaker 1>and then head out west for family reunion and then

0:00:23.440 --> 0:00:28.440
<v Speaker 1>head further west for a vacation with my wife and kids.

0:00:28.720 --> 0:00:31.760
<v Speaker 1>So we did a long draft show last night. We

0:00:31.840 --> 0:00:35.080
<v Speaker 1>will do a full draft recap show here today, hit

0:00:35.159 --> 0:00:38.400
<v Speaker 1>on some other things, potentially get to that Rogers story

0:00:38.479 --> 0:00:42.160
<v Speaker 1>that broke after our show on Tuesday, and then I'm

0:00:42.240 --> 0:00:45.159
<v Speaker 1>gone after first things first today. So but this is

0:00:45.240 --> 0:00:47.280
<v Speaker 1>kind of the right time of year to be gone.

0:00:47.280 --> 0:00:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Maybe miss the very beginning of NBA free agency, maybe

0:00:50.880 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 1>miss a potential Lakers trade. But aside from that, we

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>should be good. Demandsay, good to see you, Howard. All

0:00:58.360 --> 0:01:01.320
<v Speaker 1>six eggs for the Snakes still doing okay.

0:01:01.120 --> 0:01:03.640
<v Speaker 2>One hundred percent, still going strong. No mold now that

0:01:03.680 --> 0:01:04.600
<v Speaker 2>stuff you mean? He's great?

0:01:04.680 --> 0:01:06.759
<v Speaker 1>Okay, I didn't even know mold was a thing. This

0:01:06.800 --> 0:01:10.440
<v Speaker 1>is a new anxiety for Demon's Egg's gonna get mold

0:01:10.480 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 1>on them, and also a minor existential crisis of he

0:01:15.080 --> 0:01:17.800
<v Speaker 1>is leaving town as well, and he is leaving those

0:01:17.840 --> 0:01:21.400
<v Speaker 1>snake eggs alone in his apartment. I I you know,

0:01:21.520 --> 0:01:25.840
<v Speaker 1>I I would imagine there were some Google searches of

0:01:26.240 --> 0:01:29.640
<v Speaker 1>what happens if like power goes out in an apartment?

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:30.800
<v Speaker 1>Can someone get in?

0:01:31.000 --> 0:01:33.839
<v Speaker 3>I understand big bucket of water in there.

0:01:34.480 --> 0:01:38.240
<v Speaker 1>But there you go. And luckily we've got just bring

0:01:38.280 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 1>your apartment keys with you and our friends at Blue

0:01:41.360 --> 0:01:44.759
<v Speaker 1>Duck who are in LA if we need to overnight

0:01:44.840 --> 0:01:47.039
<v Speaker 1>them to them. If something happens, I'm sure one of

0:01:47.040 --> 0:01:50.000
<v Speaker 1>our LA based people will take care of you. I'm

0:01:50.440 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 1>very confident in that. Right now, before we get to

0:01:53.280 --> 0:01:55.560
<v Speaker 1>the act, well this is the actual show, but before

0:01:55.600 --> 0:01:58.520
<v Speaker 1>we get to the NBA draft, straight to voicemail, brought

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:03.600
<v Speaker 1>to you by our friends at boost Mobile. These guys

0:02:03.680 --> 0:02:06.440
<v Speaker 1>want me so every once in a while of the producers,

0:02:06.920 --> 0:02:08.959
<v Speaker 1>in a very kind way, set me up to fail.

0:02:09.280 --> 0:02:12.000
<v Speaker 1>They expect me to ron Burgundy some of this stuff

0:02:12.280 --> 0:02:14.640
<v Speaker 1>and just read what's written, and they want me to

0:02:14.680 --> 0:02:19.560
<v Speaker 1>say Wimby stunned and China photo dump. So I guess

0:02:19.639 --> 0:02:23.120
<v Speaker 1>that happened. The Pelicans in Washington trade CJ. McCollum for

0:02:23.200 --> 0:02:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Poole that actually kind of actually is in the show,

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:32.360
<v Speaker 1>and Caitlyn Clark slumping maybe however, ruled out with a

0:02:32.480 --> 0:02:35.200
<v Speaker 1>left with a groin strain. I think I shouldn't say

0:02:35.200 --> 0:02:38.520
<v Speaker 1>strain ruled out with a groin injury. I believe it's

0:02:38.520 --> 0:02:43.160
<v Speaker 1>a left groin, which might have saved Wilds from the

0:02:43.280 --> 0:02:46.560
<v Speaker 1>reverse take of the year with Wild's kind of soft

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:50.240
<v Speaker 1>launching the Caitlyn Clark maybe she's not good anymore take.

0:02:50.800 --> 0:02:54.079
<v Speaker 1>He didn't hard launch it, but soft launched it. Remind

0:02:54.120 --> 0:02:57.840
<v Speaker 1>her to everybody out there, like rate, subscribe review one

0:02:57.880 --> 0:03:01.080
<v Speaker 1>of the reasons to and again, these are things I

0:03:01.080 --> 0:03:04.160
<v Speaker 1>don't totally understand, but it seems like, particularly when we

0:03:04.200 --> 0:03:07.840
<v Speaker 1>do these live shows, the more people that click the

0:03:08.080 --> 0:03:12.080
<v Speaker 1>like button, it like populates and more up and more

0:03:12.320 --> 0:03:16.040
<v Speaker 1>YouTube hit feeds for other people. That's I guess why

0:03:16.120 --> 0:03:19.239
<v Speaker 1>the like is important, not because it serves my ego,

0:03:19.600 --> 0:03:22.080
<v Speaker 1>but because it could expand our audience. So I don't

0:03:22.080 --> 0:03:24.640
<v Speaker 1>really ever ask people to like the podcast, but I

0:03:24.680 --> 0:03:27.600
<v Speaker 1>guess that's helpful, So please do that if you could.

0:03:27.760 --> 0:03:30.920
<v Speaker 1>And the other reason subscribe is because sometimes we do

0:03:31.480 --> 0:03:33.960
<v Speaker 1>out of nowhere two hour live draft shows that if

0:03:33.960 --> 0:03:37.160
<v Speaker 1>you're not subscribed. You don't know we're doing all right, Demanse,

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:40.200
<v Speaker 1>Let's get to the draft itself.

0:03:40.240 --> 0:03:40.920
<v Speaker 3>Go ahead.

0:03:41.480 --> 0:03:43.440
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, So the draft was last night and you were

0:03:43.480 --> 0:03:44.520
<v Speaker 2>obviously live for that.

0:03:44.840 --> 0:03:44.960
<v Speaker 1>Uh.

0:03:45.600 --> 0:03:47.400
<v Speaker 2>There were some crazy moments in there, and one of

0:03:47.440 --> 0:03:49.280
<v Speaker 2>the notable ones was the Pelican trade.

0:03:49.560 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 3>And here's your reaction to it.

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:57.960
<v Speaker 1>Did New Orleans just ear Muff's kids? Nor Orlean's just

0:03:58.000 --> 0:04:03.320
<v Speaker 1>fucking traded away their next year's first round pick unprotected

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 1>to move up from twenty three to thirteen. That might

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:14.600
<v Speaker 1>be the most reckless draft day trade I've seen in

0:04:15.000 --> 0:04:20.560
<v Speaker 1>five years. Yeah. So that, I mean, we'll get more

0:04:20.600 --> 0:04:22.000
<v Speaker 1>into that in a second, but go ahead.

0:04:22.640 --> 0:04:22.839
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:04:22.880 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 2>Another one was Brooklyn using all five picks in Portland,

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:29.400
<v Speaker 2>taking Yang twenty five picks early. What was your single

0:04:29.440 --> 0:04:31.280
<v Speaker 2>biggest takeaway from the draft last night?

0:04:32.360 --> 0:04:35.839
<v Speaker 1>My single biggest takeaway was what New Orleans did. And listen,

0:04:36.040 --> 0:04:39.760
<v Speaker 1>we will talk Cooper Flag, and we will talk Dylan Harper,

0:04:39.839 --> 0:04:44.839
<v Speaker 1>and we will talk Ace Bailey. But I I have

0:04:44.920 --> 0:04:48.440
<v Speaker 1>had a night to sleep on it, and I am

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:55.719
<v Speaker 1>more entrenched that Joe Dumar's first draft since taking back

0:04:56.120 --> 0:05:00.000
<v Speaker 1>taking the Pelicans, Joe Dumars was not great in Detroit.

0:05:00.600 --> 0:05:03.200
<v Speaker 1>He's a great player, but was not a great executive.

0:05:03.839 --> 0:05:06.599
<v Speaker 1>And he was there for a long time, and then

0:05:06.680 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>he went to the league office for a long time.

0:05:10.120 --> 0:05:14.160
<v Speaker 1>And this is gonna be this is where Man TV

0:05:14.320 --> 0:05:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Show Today is gonna be a little tricky because we

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:21.880
<v Speaker 1>net Obviously, we all on the show say whatever we

0:05:22.120 --> 0:05:27.839
<v Speaker 1>you know, think. However, there is I at times I

0:05:28.080 --> 0:05:31.760
<v Speaker 1>feel not because of Brew, but I personally feel a

0:05:31.839 --> 0:05:35.839
<v Speaker 1>little awkward because Brew has real relationships with a lot

0:05:35.880 --> 0:05:41.960
<v Speaker 1>of people long term, and sometimes I realize, like halfway

0:05:42.000 --> 0:05:44.600
<v Speaker 1>through a take, I'm like, am I talking about one

0:05:44.640 --> 0:05:49.560
<v Speaker 1>of Bruce's friends like it? And and so I don't

0:05:49.760 --> 0:05:52.440
<v Speaker 1>know whether or not Brew has a real relationship with

0:05:52.520 --> 0:05:56.359
<v Speaker 1>Joe Dumars, but I would imagine he does. And so

0:05:56.720 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 1>it is that could be, you know, a weird spot

0:06:01.600 --> 0:06:05.000
<v Speaker 1>on First Things First Today. But listen, as I always say,

0:06:05.120 --> 0:06:07.839
<v Speaker 1>my only obligation is to the truth, and the truth

0:06:07.960 --> 0:06:10.680
<v Speaker 1>is it's one of the craziest damn things I've ever

0:06:10.720 --> 0:06:15.359
<v Speaker 1>seen the team do. And it's New Orleans. If you

0:06:15.400 --> 0:06:19.760
<v Speaker 1>weren't watching New Orleans really like Derek Queen, I, if

0:06:19.800 --> 0:06:23.920
<v Speaker 1>you were watching our live draft show, I said, I

0:06:24.000 --> 0:06:27.599
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't hate it if New Orleans took Queen at seven

0:06:28.880 --> 0:06:31.719
<v Speaker 1>when they had the opportunity, that would have been a

0:06:31.760 --> 0:06:36.400
<v Speaker 1>slight overdraft. Instead they go Jeremiah Fears, and so there's

0:06:36.520 --> 0:06:40.680
<v Speaker 1>just so much. There's so much here that I find fascinating.

0:06:41.080 --> 0:06:48.479
<v Speaker 1>One is Jeremiah Fears of high offensive upside, very questionable defender,

0:06:48.960 --> 0:06:56.279
<v Speaker 1>didn't really show efficiency in college. His direct comp is

0:06:56.440 --> 0:07:00.599
<v Speaker 1>kind of Jordan Poole, who New Orleans just tray for

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:04.120
<v Speaker 1>a day before the draft. So you trade it for

0:07:04.240 --> 0:07:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Jordan Poole, you then draft Jeremiah Fears. The other guy

0:07:08.680 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 1>that they were clearly very interested in is Derek Queen,

0:07:12.240 --> 0:07:14.800
<v Speaker 1>a guy I like a lot, but a guy that

0:07:15.040 --> 0:07:20.560
<v Speaker 1>I said during the draft show not in athleticism, but

0:07:20.800 --> 0:07:24.800
<v Speaker 1>in strengths and weaknesses as a player. Reminds you a

0:07:24.840 --> 0:07:28.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of Zion. Where can kind of play a little

0:07:29.040 --> 0:07:34.360
<v Speaker 1>point forward is you know, has real questions defensively, Zion

0:07:34.480 --> 0:07:38.800
<v Speaker 1>wasn't supposed to but ended up having those. Is not

0:07:38.880 --> 0:07:42.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be a great shooter, but and it is

0:07:42.320 --> 0:07:44.560
<v Speaker 1>not going to be a real rim protector because he's

0:07:44.560 --> 0:07:47.160
<v Speaker 1>not seven feet tall or even really like you know,

0:07:47.240 --> 0:07:50.120
<v Speaker 1>a pro Zion is not even approaching seven feet tall,

0:07:50.160 --> 0:07:55.760
<v Speaker 1>and there are some work ethic concerns, there are some

0:07:56.240 --> 0:07:59.960
<v Speaker 1>why aren't you in better shape concerns, but the talent

0:08:00.280 --> 0:08:04.840
<v Speaker 1>is really right there it New Orleans has that guy

0:08:04.880 --> 0:08:10.520
<v Speaker 1>in Zion. They take Derek Queen, which again I don't hate,

0:08:10.560 --> 0:08:14.360
<v Speaker 1>in a vacuum, and some might say, well, that then

0:08:14.440 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 1>allows you potentially more easily to trade Zion if you

0:08:19.840 --> 0:08:23.040
<v Speaker 1>want to replace him with Derek Queen. All that would

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:27.560
<v Speaker 1>make sense if they had simply taken Derreck Queen at seven,

0:08:28.080 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 1>or if they had simply traded made any other type

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 1>of trade other than trading away what is potentially, potentially

0:08:40.840 --> 0:08:46.320
<v Speaker 1>all things considered, the most valuable pick going into next

0:08:46.360 --> 0:08:48.960
<v Speaker 1>year's draft. And the reason I say that is not

0:08:49.080 --> 0:08:52.640
<v Speaker 1>because I think New Orleans is the team most likely

0:08:52.960 --> 0:08:55.560
<v Speaker 1>to have the worst record in basketball. The reason I

0:08:55.600 --> 0:09:00.600
<v Speaker 1>say that is that's not what they traded. So they

0:09:00.640 --> 0:09:05.160
<v Speaker 1>went from twenty three to thirteen. So to the cost

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:10.199
<v Speaker 1>to move up those ten spots, they traded away unprotected

0:09:10.640 --> 0:09:15.000
<v Speaker 1>twenty twenty six draft pick that will be either New

0:09:15.120 --> 0:09:25.080
<v Speaker 1>Orleans or Milwaukee, the better of the two. So New

0:09:25.200 --> 0:09:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Orleans has I don't know, a fifteen percent chance to

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 1>be the worst team in the league next year, and

0:09:36.960 --> 0:09:43.000
<v Speaker 1>Milwaukee has like, here's the question, what is the chance

0:09:43.280 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 1>Yannis gets hurt slash? What is the chance or added

0:09:48.679 --> 0:09:53.880
<v Speaker 1>to the chance that Milwaukee trades Giannis? Because whatever is

0:09:53.960 --> 0:09:59.560
<v Speaker 1>that five percent? If that happens, Milwaukee's the worst team

0:09:59.600 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 1>in the league. Milwaukee with Dame out potentially the whole year.

0:10:03.240 --> 0:10:06.520
<v Speaker 1>If Giannis gets dinged or if they just trade him,

0:10:06.679 --> 0:10:10.400
<v Speaker 1>they become the worst team in the league. And the

0:10:10.480 --> 0:10:13.040
<v Speaker 1>other teams that are in contention for the worst team

0:10:13.080 --> 0:10:21.679
<v Speaker 1>in the league, most notably Charlotte and Brooklyn and maybe Washington,

0:10:22.200 --> 0:10:25.079
<v Speaker 1>those teams are in the East Utah as well as

0:10:25.120 --> 0:10:31.600
<v Speaker 1>in there. So to give away that draft pick that

0:10:31.679 --> 0:10:36.320
<v Speaker 1>might be aj Debanza or you know, or again it

0:10:36.400 --> 0:10:45.600
<v Speaker 1>will almost assuredly be a top ten pick and has

0:10:45.640 --> 0:10:50.000
<v Speaker 1>a real chance of being a top five pick for

0:10:51.160 --> 0:10:58.040
<v Speaker 1>not not for a superstar, not as a package to

0:10:58.160 --> 0:11:01.800
<v Speaker 1>get a player like Giannis, but to just move up

0:11:02.480 --> 0:11:04.959
<v Speaker 1>and get a guy who, if you had not moved

0:11:05.040 --> 0:11:07.960
<v Speaker 1>up and taken him, was likely going to fall out

0:11:08.000 --> 0:11:13.840
<v Speaker 1>of the lottery. It's just incomprehensibly bad. And I was

0:11:13.880 --> 0:11:19.000
<v Speaker 1>thinking yesterday like what version of this trade would I

0:11:19.040 --> 0:11:23.440
<v Speaker 1>have made if I were New Orleans. Would I have

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:31.560
<v Speaker 1>offered this unprotected twenty twenty six better of New Orleans

0:11:31.600 --> 0:11:35.640
<v Speaker 1>or Milwaukee straight up for the thirteenth pick, not even

0:11:35.640 --> 0:11:38.400
<v Speaker 1>including the twenty third pick. No, I would not have.

0:11:39.880 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 1>Would I have done this trade demonse if it were

0:11:44.760 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 1>the opposite, meaning twenty three thirteen to four twenty three

0:11:50.600 --> 0:11:56.720
<v Speaker 1>and the worse of the two New Orleans Milwaukee picks,

0:11:56.920 --> 0:11:59.600
<v Speaker 1>I wouldn't have done that either, because it's on the board.

0:11:59.600 --> 0:12:02.600
<v Speaker 1>They're both both bad. Like again, I don't I think

0:12:02.600 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 1>Milwaukee should be fine, but they, more than any team

0:12:06.160 --> 0:12:10.320
<v Speaker 1>in the league, are a one man show, other than

0:12:10.480 --> 0:12:13.480
<v Speaker 1>maybe Denver, but even Denver, if Joker were to go down,

0:12:13.920 --> 0:12:18.320
<v Speaker 1>you have other pieces you like it. Would I have

0:12:18.520 --> 0:12:26.840
<v Speaker 1>traded twenty three and next year's unprotected number one to

0:12:27.120 --> 0:12:33.439
<v Speaker 1>move up to seven, which again wouldn't have made sense

0:12:33.480 --> 0:12:35.559
<v Speaker 1>because New Orleans already had seven, But you understand what

0:12:35.640 --> 0:12:39.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean. I wouldn't have done that. So I think

0:12:39.559 --> 0:12:47.880
<v Speaker 1>this will go down. We have to see, you know,

0:12:47.960 --> 0:12:51.640
<v Speaker 1>where these picks land, and we will see it. But

0:12:51.720 --> 0:12:58.360
<v Speaker 1>I think this will be like the Hawks trading Luca

0:12:58.440 --> 0:13:02.520
<v Speaker 1>for Trey, the tie of move that we reference for

0:13:02.760 --> 0:13:05.920
<v Speaker 1>on Draft night that we reference for years and years

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:06.720
<v Speaker 1>and years.

0:13:06.800 --> 0:13:09.040
<v Speaker 2>Maybe the Pelicans front office is in love with that

0:13:09.160 --> 0:13:12.440
<v Speaker 2>archetype and they're just backup planes. You know, if those

0:13:12.720 --> 0:13:14.520
<v Speaker 2>the other two don't pan out, we're shipping them out

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 2>of here.

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:18.360
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, right, So you trade for Pool, your draft,

0:13:18.640 --> 0:13:20.480
<v Speaker 1>a guy who maybe one day can be Pool, and

0:13:20.559 --> 0:13:22.479
<v Speaker 1>Fears you have Zion.

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:25.200
<v Speaker 2>And you've already seen what Pool and Zion are kind

0:13:25.200 --> 0:13:26.280
<v Speaker 2>of like being in the NBA.

0:13:27.000 --> 0:13:31.439
<v Speaker 1>I don't yes, I mean, it's clearly something like that, Demante,

0:13:31.679 --> 0:13:38.800
<v Speaker 1>but it if we right now, let me check on DraftKings,

0:13:39.400 --> 0:13:47.440
<v Speaker 1>the the odds for team futures. Can we I just

0:13:47.480 --> 0:13:52.559
<v Speaker 1>see finals? Okay, here we go conference winner in the West,

0:13:54.120 --> 0:14:00.439
<v Speaker 1>New Orleans. There are I mean, that's the West is

0:14:00.480 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 1>so funny. There are nine teams that are twenty five

0:14:05.000 --> 0:14:12.719
<v Speaker 1>to one or better, so OKC, Houston, Minnesota, Lakers, Nuggets, Warriors, Spurs, Clippers, Mavericks.

0:14:13.080 --> 0:14:15.560
<v Speaker 1>Those nine teams won through nine or twenty five to one.

0:14:15.880 --> 0:14:19.880
<v Speaker 1>There are then six teams that are one hundred and

0:14:20.000 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 1>ten to one or worse. The Grizzlies, the Pels, the Kings,

0:14:26.440 --> 0:14:34.600
<v Speaker 1>the Suns, the Blazers, the Jazz. The Jazz should be

0:14:34.640 --> 0:14:38.560
<v Speaker 1>the worst team in the West next year. After that,

0:14:40.960 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 1>the Kings and Grizzlies want to win. The Suns obviously

0:14:46.600 --> 0:14:49.520
<v Speaker 1>want to win, and the Blazers just traded for a

0:14:49.600 --> 0:14:53.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty six year old Drew Holiday. Now it doesn't mean

0:14:53.240 --> 0:14:56.520
<v Speaker 1>those and New Orleans obviously wants to win. My point

0:14:56.600 --> 0:14:59.800
<v Speaker 1>is only one team in the West doesn't want to win.

0:14:59.840 --> 0:15:04.560
<v Speaker 1>In Utah, You're not gonna, you know, fall into easy

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 1>conference victories. I I just I am gobsmacked at this,

0:15:14.400 --> 0:15:21.680
<v Speaker 1>and I maybe it's a nerdy look at uh the

0:15:21.800 --> 0:15:25.400
<v Speaker 1>draft to be focused on this trade. I just think

0:15:25.400 --> 0:15:28.800
<v Speaker 1>it's one of the most reckless moves I've seen a

0:15:28.840 --> 0:15:33.160
<v Speaker 1>teammate in a very, very long time. And it also

0:15:33.280 --> 0:15:37.040
<v Speaker 1>does show you this is one of the cool things

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:44.360
<v Speaker 1>about the draft, the ticking clock factor. Like if this

0:15:44.480 --> 0:15:49.920
<v Speaker 1>would have been done in right during the course of

0:15:50.000 --> 0:15:54.560
<v Speaker 1>regular business, would cooler heads in New Orleans have prevailed

0:15:54.560 --> 0:15:58.360
<v Speaker 1>and been like, hey, Joe, what if we offer them

0:15:58.400 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 1>this exact trade, but just say the pick has to

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:07.240
<v Speaker 1>be top ten protected and they say no, and we say, okay,

0:16:07.280 --> 0:16:10.920
<v Speaker 1>top five protected, then certainly you could have done top

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:14.960
<v Speaker 1>one protected like they you would have been able to

0:16:15.000 --> 0:16:19.600
<v Speaker 1>better massage or get a swap back or something. But

0:16:19.800 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>because five minutes, Yeah, you want to miss out on

0:16:26.320 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 1>your player, you gotta go. And the new I mean

0:16:31.200 --> 0:16:35.200
<v Speaker 1>a triple plus to the new Hawks front office. What

0:16:35.360 --> 0:16:38.600
<v Speaker 1>an opening few days got off some bad salary, added

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:47.120
<v Speaker 1>Chris STAPs came away with an absolute it is I

0:16:47.120 --> 0:16:58.360
<v Speaker 1>don't know, a ten percent chance, No, probably higher fifteen

0:16:58.440 --> 0:17:02.800
<v Speaker 1>percent chance these had a top three pick. It's unbelievable.

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:05.480
<v Speaker 1>It's really unbelievable. All right, we'll get to the big

0:17:05.680 --> 0:17:08.520
<v Speaker 1>the first and the second pick in just a second. Book. First,

0:17:08.760 --> 0:17:11.800
<v Speaker 1>hotels in Vegas may be book solid this weekend, but

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:15.320
<v Speaker 1>there's one vacancy left to be filled. At UFC three seventeen,

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:20.200
<v Speaker 1>a new lightweight champ will be crowned. Grab your own

0:17:20.240 --> 0:17:23.680
<v Speaker 1>crownd A DraftKings sportsbook, the official sports betting partner of UFC.

0:17:23.960 --> 0:17:28.280
<v Speaker 1>Taporia takes on Olavera to fill the vacant men's lightweight title,

0:17:28.840 --> 0:17:33.320
<v Speaker 1>and Alexander Pantosia defends his flyweight belt against Kai Car

0:17:33.480 --> 0:17:37.240
<v Speaker 1>France in the co main event. Who you taking first

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:40.479
<v Speaker 1>time betting on UFC? At DraftKings? Just pick something simple

0:17:40.800 --> 0:17:42.800
<v Speaker 1>like a fighter to win. Doesn't get more simple? Than

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:46.040
<v Speaker 1>that and make your pick. It really is that easy.

0:17:46.080 --> 0:17:48.720
<v Speaker 1>And if you're new to DraftKings, check this out. New

0:17:48.760 --> 0:17:51.920
<v Speaker 1>customers who bet five dollars, we'll get one hundred and

0:17:51.920 --> 0:17:56.679
<v Speaker 1>fifty dollars in bonus bets instantly. Download the DraftKings Sportsbook

0:17:56.720 --> 0:18:01.040
<v Speaker 1>app now and use code right, code right wri IGHD.

0:18:01.160 --> 0:18:03.720
<v Speaker 1>That's code right for new customers to get one hundred

0:18:03.720 --> 0:18:06.760
<v Speaker 1>and fifty dollars in bonus bets instantly when you bet

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:11.400
<v Speaker 1>just five bucks only on DraftKings. The Crown is yours.

0:18:11.760 --> 0:18:14.440
<v Speaker 4>Gambling problem called one eight hundred gambler in New York

0:18:14.520 --> 0:18:16.960
<v Speaker 4>called eight seven seven eight open wire text hope and

0:18:16.960 --> 0:18:19.520
<v Speaker 4>wy AT four six seven three six nine In Connecticut.

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:21.800
<v Speaker 4>Help is available for a problem gambling called eight eight

0:18:21.800 --> 0:18:24.080
<v Speaker 4>eight seven eight nine seven seven seven seven or visit

0:18:24.160 --> 0:18:27.480
<v Speaker 4>CCPG dot org. Please play responsibly on behalf of boothillk

0:18:27.480 --> 0:18:30.560
<v Speaker 4>A Cinnamon Resorting Kansas twenty one on over agent. Eligibility

0:18:30.640 --> 0:18:33.280
<v Speaker 4>varies by jurisdiction, Voyd and Ontario. Bet must win to

0:18:33.359 --> 0:18:36.840
<v Speaker 4>receive reward minimum minus five hundred odds required. Bonus bets

0:18:36.840 --> 0:18:39.000
<v Speaker 4>expire one hundred and sixty eight hours after issue in

0:18:39.119 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 4>four additional terms and responsible gaming resources see DKNG dot

0:18:42.880 --> 0:18:43.919
<v Speaker 4>co slash audio.

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:46.399
<v Speaker 1>All right, demonte, let's get to the top pick of

0:18:46.440 --> 0:18:46.919
<v Speaker 1>the draft.

0:18:47.840 --> 0:18:51.199
<v Speaker 2>So, as expected, the MAVs took Cooper Flag with the

0:18:51.240 --> 0:18:55.560
<v Speaker 2>first pick, so they extended Kyrie and Gafford. The question is,

0:18:55.680 --> 0:18:58.160
<v Speaker 2>if Kyrie ends up healthy, do you think that Dallas's

0:18:58.200 --> 0:18:59.960
<v Speaker 2>contenders for Dallas ARC.

0:19:01.160 --> 0:19:02.200
<v Speaker 1>Do you think they are?

0:19:02.480 --> 0:19:03.600
<v Speaker 3>Yes? I do.

0:19:03.760 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I knew I could tell just from the look in

0:19:06.040 --> 0:19:08.200
<v Speaker 1>your face, So go ahead.

0:19:09.280 --> 0:19:11.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I mean, I was just telling the guys this morning.

0:19:11.920 --> 0:19:14.639
<v Speaker 2>The balance of defense and offense on that team also

0:19:14.800 --> 0:19:16.880
<v Speaker 2>paired in with the way I know that's your guy,

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:19.360
<v Speaker 2>but the way that Luca was looking in the playoffs

0:19:19.480 --> 0:19:22.840
<v Speaker 2>last year, it just kind of seems like Beakle might

0:19:22.880 --> 0:19:24.920
<v Speaker 2>have had a grasp on the situation and what was

0:19:24.960 --> 0:19:25.880
<v Speaker 2>going on over there.

0:19:26.160 --> 0:19:27.200
<v Speaker 3>And I like that team.

0:19:27.480 --> 0:19:29.919
<v Speaker 2>Like if Cooper Flag pans out nicely, I hate that

0:19:29.960 --> 0:19:31.439
<v Speaker 2>it worked out for him, and you know he got

0:19:31.520 --> 0:19:33.359
<v Speaker 2>that they ended up with the number one pick. But

0:19:33.440 --> 0:19:35.840
<v Speaker 2>with that number one pick, that's a that's a squad

0:19:35.920 --> 0:19:36.280
<v Speaker 2>right there.

0:19:37.560 --> 0:19:41.199
<v Speaker 1>So so that let's talk about the Nico piece of

0:19:41.200 --> 0:19:45.720
<v Speaker 1>this and then we'll get to the team. Because Nico

0:19:45.800 --> 0:19:50.479
<v Speaker 1>had a quote Nico said, Fortune favors the bold and

0:19:50.560 --> 0:19:53.760
<v Speaker 1>on behalf of MAVs fans everywhere. I wanted to break

0:19:53.760 --> 0:19:58.000
<v Speaker 1>a TV. Yeah, it's you do not. You do not

0:19:59.200 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 1>get to Trey Luca hold a press conference saying we

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:09.240
<v Speaker 1>did this for this year because we think we are

0:20:09.280 --> 0:20:13.280
<v Speaker 1>better right now to win a championship this year or

0:20:13.359 --> 0:20:17.160
<v Speaker 1>next year, and then end up bad enough that you're

0:20:17.280 --> 0:20:21.800
<v Speaker 1>in the lottery and fall last backwards into the number

0:20:21.880 --> 0:20:25.720
<v Speaker 1>one pick and then be like all part of the plan.

0:20:26.880 --> 0:20:30.000
<v Speaker 1>If at that listen, honest to god, if at that

0:20:30.080 --> 0:20:36.880
<v Speaker 1>press conference he had said, listen, we are all about championships.

0:20:37.880 --> 0:20:40.879
<v Speaker 1>I even though we thought last year's finals appearance was

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:45.600
<v Speaker 1>fool's gold, and we traded for Anthony Davis knowing he's

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:48.160
<v Speaker 1>injured and by the way, he's gonna take some time

0:20:48.200 --> 0:20:50.679
<v Speaker 1>to come back this year. This is not about this season,

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:54.240
<v Speaker 1>and we may or may not even be back in

0:20:54.280 --> 0:20:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs this year. We're okay with this because this

0:20:56.720 --> 0:20:59.399
<v Speaker 1>is a long term play. And then you end up

0:20:59.440 --> 0:21:03.200
<v Speaker 1>with Cooper, then you can say, told you a part

0:21:03.200 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 1>of the plan. Didn't expect number one pick, but we

0:21:05.600 --> 0:21:08.000
<v Speaker 1>were going to add an im back player. Fine, they

0:21:08.119 --> 0:21:11.520
<v Speaker 1>don't get to be like, we are doing this to

0:21:11.560 --> 0:21:15.560
<v Speaker 1>contend right now, you fall into the and and then

0:21:15.640 --> 0:21:18.160
<v Speaker 1>be in the play in and be trying to win

0:21:18.240 --> 0:21:20.919
<v Speaker 1>the play in, lose, fall into the lottery, get the

0:21:20.960 --> 0:21:23.159
<v Speaker 1>number one pick, and be like Bang told you. So

0:21:23.240 --> 0:21:25.800
<v Speaker 1>that's first of all. But they are where they are.

0:21:25.920 --> 0:21:28.080
<v Speaker 2>Go ahead, well, yeah, Just to be clear, I don't

0:21:28.080 --> 0:21:29.800
<v Speaker 2>want to give Nico. I don't want to give him

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:33.800
<v Speaker 2>any credit for this, Like no, the Luca piece of it,

0:21:33.880 --> 0:21:36.199
<v Speaker 2>Like I kind of can see he's a little bit

0:21:36.200 --> 0:21:38.520
<v Speaker 2>onto something. It was a crazy trade, but with it

0:21:38.560 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 2>work painting out the way it did and then getting

0:21:40.560 --> 0:21:43.479
<v Speaker 2>that first pick, I think they have quite the squad

0:21:43.520 --> 0:21:44.240
<v Speaker 2>on them right now.

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:49.120
<v Speaker 1>Okay, so that's the real question is do they And

0:21:49.280 --> 0:21:52.959
<v Speaker 1>my answer to that question is I think right now

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:58.600
<v Speaker 1>they are more than a touch over rated. And here's

0:21:58.640 --> 0:22:02.600
<v Speaker 1>why I listen. I heard uh and again this is

0:22:04.080 --> 0:22:07.040
<v Speaker 1>not picking on him. I think other people thought this,

0:22:07.240 --> 0:22:10.080
<v Speaker 1>but I heard this from I heard Steven A yesterday

0:22:10.119 --> 0:22:13.000
<v Speaker 1>say that they think that he thinks they could be

0:22:13.040 --> 0:22:19.240
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma City's biggest competitor. I disagree. And the reason I

0:22:19.320 --> 0:22:26.000
<v Speaker 1>disagree is this, I do not care how good you are,

0:22:31.280 --> 0:22:36.920
<v Speaker 1>how what your profile is in the modern NBA. In particular,

0:22:38.960 --> 0:22:41.560
<v Speaker 1>rookies that have to be the focal point of a

0:22:41.600 --> 0:22:47.840
<v Speaker 1>team's offense do not contribute to winning flatly. They just don't.

0:22:48.200 --> 0:22:51.800
<v Speaker 1>Like I understand Magic was great as a rookie, he

0:22:51.880 --> 0:22:54.080
<v Speaker 1>was not the focal point of the team's offense. Kareem

0:22:54.240 --> 0:23:01.680
<v Speaker 1>was lebron as unbelievable as he was. That Cavs team

0:23:02.080 --> 0:23:06.040
<v Speaker 1>missed the playoffs. Michael Jordan as a rookie, I think,

0:23:06.080 --> 0:23:10.720
<v Speaker 1>averaged twenty eight points a game. That Bulls team won

0:23:12.400 --> 0:23:20.760
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight games. Okay, like asking rookies. Hell, take the

0:23:20.800 --> 0:23:26.000
<v Speaker 1>MAVs with Luca Luca's first year he was Cooper. Flag's

0:23:26.040 --> 0:23:28.520
<v Speaker 1>not going to be better than Luca year one Luca.

0:23:29.040 --> 0:23:32.480
<v Speaker 1>When year two Luki was first Team All NBA, they

0:23:32.600 --> 0:23:37.760
<v Speaker 1>won thirty three games. Now, obviously those guys didn't have

0:23:37.800 --> 0:23:41.240
<v Speaker 1>an Anthony Davis on that on their team and eventually

0:23:41.400 --> 0:23:46.200
<v Speaker 1>Kyrie Irving, but so they they should be better than

0:23:46.280 --> 0:23:50.400
<v Speaker 1>those records. But the point that I am making is

0:23:51.080 --> 0:23:54.440
<v Speaker 1>as long as Kyrie is out, and I do not

0:23:54.640 --> 0:23:59.440
<v Speaker 1>think Kyrie. I think expecting Kyrie to be back before

0:23:59.480 --> 0:24:03.960
<v Speaker 1>the alls our break is foolish. I think Kyrie Irving,

0:24:04.200 --> 0:24:08.919
<v Speaker 1>given his you know, knee history and injury history and

0:24:09.000 --> 0:24:12.119
<v Speaker 1>his size in his age, and you just signed him

0:24:12.160 --> 0:24:16.399
<v Speaker 1>to an extension, Rushing him back would be foolish. And

0:24:16.720 --> 0:24:21.160
<v Speaker 1>until Kyrie comes back, you are going to be asking

0:24:21.720 --> 0:24:27.199
<v Speaker 1>your primary ball handler and your primary creator to be

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:31.840
<v Speaker 1>an eighteen year old. Like I love Flags Upside because

0:24:31.840 --> 0:24:37.679
<v Speaker 1>of his age, but he's eighteen. He turns nineteen in December,

0:24:38.760 --> 0:24:42.240
<v Speaker 1>and you know, maybe Clay as a bounce back year.

0:24:42.560 --> 0:24:47.119
<v Speaker 1>He is not creating. Anthony Davis is awesome. He is

0:24:47.160 --> 0:24:52.800
<v Speaker 1>not creating Gafford and PJ. Washington and Derek Lively are

0:24:52.840 --> 0:24:57.399
<v Speaker 1>all useful players, they are not creating. You traded away

0:24:57.440 --> 0:24:59.920
<v Speaker 1>a guy who could create a bit in Quentin Grimes

0:25:00.320 --> 0:25:04.399
<v Speaker 1>for reasons I don't totally understand to bring in Caleb Martin.

0:25:04.840 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 1>So like your secondary main creator is gonna be Max Christie,

0:25:13.600 --> 0:25:16.639
<v Speaker 1>the other part of the A D trade until Kyrie

0:25:16.800 --> 0:25:17.280
<v Speaker 1>gets back.

0:25:18.680 --> 0:25:20.639
<v Speaker 3>He is. He's just not good at creating shots.

0:25:21.280 --> 0:25:24.720
<v Speaker 1>No, I don't Dinwitt, Am I wrong? I thought Dinwitty

0:25:24.840 --> 0:25:27.720
<v Speaker 1>was a free agent. Maybe I'm the I don't so

0:25:28.160 --> 0:25:33.560
<v Speaker 1>I think Dinwitty right now is the Uh. Maybe they

0:25:33.600 --> 0:25:35.879
<v Speaker 1>bring him back, but he's so he's not on the

0:25:35.960 --> 0:25:39.359
<v Speaker 1>roster right now. So they I mean so and Dinwitty is.

0:25:41.080 --> 0:25:46.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean, there's a reason that Dinwitti's last few last

0:25:46.520 --> 0:25:49.080
<v Speaker 1>contract was for the league minimum, you know what I mean,

0:25:49.119 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 1>Like he he can be a microwave offense, but he is.

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:54.679
<v Speaker 2>He was about to say, if it's if it's for

0:25:54.760 --> 0:25:57.560
<v Speaker 2>the purpose of making it to where Cooper Flag isn't

0:25:57.600 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 2>your main guy, then you know, well, din Winnie's the alternative.

0:26:02.640 --> 0:26:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Sure something, And maybe that's something. And free agency hasn't

0:26:06.040 --> 0:26:08.920
<v Speaker 1>happened yet, and they obviously will you know, add some

0:26:08.920 --> 0:26:11.400
<v Speaker 1>some pieces. They will add some things. I understand that,

0:26:11.880 --> 0:26:20.399
<v Speaker 1>but I I do not think it is rational to

0:26:20.600 --> 0:26:26.280
<v Speaker 1>expect the MAVs this next year with Kyrie playing. I

0:26:26.280 --> 0:26:29.399
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I would say thirty games at best, And

0:26:29.440 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 1>I would take the strong under on that with Anthony Davis.

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:37.280
<v Speaker 1>And you know, if you if you right now as

0:26:37.320 --> 0:26:40.199
<v Speaker 1>a MAVs fan, if you were like, hey, eighty is

0:26:40.240 --> 0:26:43.120
<v Speaker 1>gonna play sixty five games on the nose, you would

0:26:43.160 --> 0:26:45.919
<v Speaker 1>be like take it, like, you know, I'll sign up

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:50.360
<v Speaker 1>for that immediately. And with Cooper Flag being the youngest

0:26:50.440 --> 0:26:54.600
<v Speaker 1>kid in this draft class, and you know, having a

0:26:54.640 --> 0:26:59.000
<v Speaker 1>lot on his plate. I don't think in twenty twenty

0:26:59.320 --> 0:27:04.879
<v Speaker 1>this coming season, the MAVs are contenders. I do think

0:27:05.640 --> 0:27:13.040
<v Speaker 1>that if Kyrie comes back from that knee injury and

0:27:13.160 --> 0:27:16.560
<v Speaker 1>looks like he did before the knee injury, and Cooper

0:27:16.680 --> 0:27:21.119
<v Speaker 1>Flag is the guy that a lot of people think

0:27:21.160 --> 0:27:27.320
<v Speaker 1>he can be that in the season after this one,

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:32.080
<v Speaker 1>they can be really good. So I don't. If I

0:27:32.119 --> 0:27:38.440
<v Speaker 1>am power ranking the West going into this coming season,

0:27:39.359 --> 0:27:49.000
<v Speaker 1>I personally would power rank it thunder Rockets, Lakers with

0:27:49.320 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 1>an asterisk, the asterisk being I'm assuming they are going

0:27:54.040 --> 0:28:01.919
<v Speaker 1>to add a major piece in the next ten days. Nuggets,

0:28:01.960 --> 0:28:14.360
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota four five, Golden State six, and then Dallas alongside

0:28:14.480 --> 0:28:18.679
<v Speaker 1>the Clipper Clippers seven eight. That's where that's where I

0:28:18.680 --> 0:28:22.560
<v Speaker 1>think they will be for next year. Now, in two years,

0:28:22.680 --> 0:28:27.879
<v Speaker 1>I think that could be different. And that does not,

0:28:28.320 --> 0:28:36.239
<v Speaker 1>by the way, take into account much of what the

0:28:36.320 --> 0:28:41.120
<v Speaker 1>Spurs can potentially be. And so let's get to the

0:28:41.200 --> 0:28:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Spurs here. Demonse.

0:28:42.680 --> 0:28:44.680
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, so everybody figured he was going to go number

0:28:44.680 --> 0:28:48.480
<v Speaker 2>two to the Spurs, but nobody else but oh Dylan Harper,

0:28:48.480 --> 0:28:51.240
<v Speaker 2>Sorry I specific, but they still have.

0:28:51.240 --> 0:28:54.040
<v Speaker 3>Harper, Castle and Fox. What is do you think they're

0:28:54.080 --> 0:28:54.840
<v Speaker 3>going to trade something.

0:28:55.880 --> 0:29:01.560
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so here listen. It's an interesting triumvirn of guards

0:29:02.680 --> 0:29:06.720
<v Speaker 1>because I like them all, but they all not only

0:29:06.880 --> 0:29:11.520
<v Speaker 1>have kind of, at least at the moment, a weakness,

0:29:12.480 --> 0:29:17.840
<v Speaker 1>but it's all the same weakness, which is, they all

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:21.920
<v Speaker 1>like to do most of their damage inside the three

0:29:22.000 --> 0:29:27.520
<v Speaker 1>point arc. And none of them are great perimeter shooters.

0:29:28.280 --> 0:29:31.840
<v Speaker 1>Castle and again Castle, these guys are young. Fox isn't

0:29:32.200 --> 0:29:35.760
<v Speaker 1>Fox is thirty three percent for his career, Castle last

0:29:35.840 --> 0:29:40.239
<v Speaker 1>year twenty eight percent. Dylan Harper at Rutgers was not

0:29:40.320 --> 0:29:44.200
<v Speaker 1>a was not great from three himself, and so and

0:29:44.240 --> 0:29:46.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm pulling it up right now, or at least I'm

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:48.719
<v Speaker 1>much okay. They switched it to his pro stats. At

0:29:48.800 --> 0:29:52.760
<v Speaker 1>Rutgers he was thirty three percent. So those three guys

0:29:53.400 --> 0:29:57.520
<v Speaker 1>having you can play a three guard lineup at times

0:29:57.800 --> 0:30:03.680
<v Speaker 1>you cannot play a three guard non shooting lineup. I

0:30:03.760 --> 0:30:07.840
<v Speaker 1>also think the Spur so Dylan Harper was a no

0:30:07.960 --> 0:30:14.800
<v Speaker 1>doubt gotta pick him guy at number two. I also

0:30:14.880 --> 0:30:22.600
<v Speaker 1>think the Spurs are really going to ease in to

0:30:22.720 --> 0:30:27.680
<v Speaker 1>the Wimby era. They're gonna let Harper, Fox and Castle

0:30:27.840 --> 0:30:34.800
<v Speaker 1>compete try different things. And one of those guys is

0:30:34.880 --> 0:30:38.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be a key piece in a major trade

0:30:39.520 --> 0:30:43.240
<v Speaker 1>like that? Is that I am very confident in now.

0:30:43.280 --> 0:30:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I think they would love to pair Harper alongside Wimby

0:30:48.520 --> 0:30:52.560
<v Speaker 1>for the next ten years. But if Yiannis were to

0:30:52.640 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 1>come available and the Bucks want Harper, then you trade

0:30:57.400 --> 0:31:02.080
<v Speaker 1>the Bucks Harper like if a and if Joannis doesn't

0:31:02.120 --> 0:31:08.160
<v Speaker 1>come available, but a different tier type of guy does,

0:31:08.280 --> 0:31:14.320
<v Speaker 1>and who would that be? Katie just got traded. There's

0:31:14.400 --> 0:31:18.760
<v Speaker 1>the top tier guys who are just not coming available.

0:31:18.960 --> 0:31:22.240
<v Speaker 1>Let me pull up my latest King of the Hill

0:31:22.840 --> 0:31:25.800
<v Speaker 1>just as a quick, uh kind of a shorthand for

0:31:25.880 --> 0:31:30.120
<v Speaker 1>me of the best players in the league. So Yo

0:31:30.240 --> 0:31:32.840
<v Speaker 1>Kic's not coming well, I mean, yo, we don't think

0:31:32.920 --> 0:31:35.800
<v Speaker 1>yoj coming available. Josh Cronky's like, we don't want to

0:31:35.840 --> 0:31:40.960
<v Speaker 1>trade him, but you know, shit happens. So who's a

0:31:41.000 --> 0:31:47.720
<v Speaker 1>good example. Okay, here's a great one. Let's say Devin

0:31:47.760 --> 0:31:52.040
<v Speaker 1>Booker has a change of heart after another shit year

0:31:52.360 --> 0:31:56.840
<v Speaker 1>in Phoenix. It's like, you know what, I can get

0:31:56.880 --> 0:32:00.400
<v Speaker 1>my cars shipped to Texas and I I want to

0:32:00.440 --> 0:32:02.640
<v Speaker 1>play in big games. I played in the finals as

0:32:02.680 --> 0:32:07.920
<v Speaker 1>a kid, and that you know, next level star player,

0:32:08.000 --> 0:32:13.960
<v Speaker 1>but not yoh, honest, then you maybe you don't have

0:32:14.040 --> 0:32:18.000
<v Speaker 1>to trade Harper in that, but you trade Castle and

0:32:18.200 --> 0:32:24.200
<v Speaker 1>Fox like there's different You have now I think three

0:32:24.560 --> 0:32:32.840
<v Speaker 1>legitimate assets that other teams would want to varying degrees like.

0:32:33.040 --> 0:32:37.480
<v Speaker 1>And now the tricky thing is on the Fox point.

0:32:38.560 --> 0:32:42.719
<v Speaker 1>This is am I right about this? Yeah, this is

0:32:42.760 --> 0:32:45.440
<v Speaker 1>the last year of his deal. So the other thing

0:32:45.480 --> 0:32:49.320
<v Speaker 1>that could happen is that Fox walks after this year.

0:32:49.840 --> 0:32:53.400
<v Speaker 1>I would imagine that's not how this plays. I would

0:32:53.440 --> 0:33:00.920
<v Speaker 1>imagine that they would try to, you know, pally move

0:33:01.040 --> 0:33:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Fox at the deadline if need be, so they get

0:33:03.560 --> 0:33:06.880
<v Speaker 1>something back from him. But they have Castle and Harper

0:33:06.920 --> 0:33:09.600
<v Speaker 1>on rookie deals. They will see how all of them

0:33:09.640 --> 0:33:13.360
<v Speaker 1>play next to Wimby. But the Spurs right now are

0:33:14.640 --> 0:33:18.120
<v Speaker 1>in a I think a very good position, but a

0:33:18.240 --> 0:33:26.120
<v Speaker 1>unique position because their four most valuable assets or players

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:31.160
<v Speaker 1>are all guys who like to shoot, except for Castle

0:33:31.280 --> 0:33:34.160
<v Speaker 1>is not a big shooter, like to shoot threes, and

0:33:34.200 --> 0:33:36.960
<v Speaker 1>I'm including Wimby in this, and none of them are

0:33:36.960 --> 0:33:39.560
<v Speaker 1>guys who are that good at shooting threes.

0:33:40.640 --> 0:33:44.280
<v Speaker 3>So the say it again, He says, you got to

0:33:44.280 --> 0:33:46.160
<v Speaker 3>take Wimby out. Then you said, not good? What do

0:33:46.240 --> 0:33:49.720
<v Speaker 3>you mean he's not terrible? I like Winby shooting threes.

0:33:51.040 --> 0:33:54.800
<v Speaker 1>Wimby doesn't need to shoot nine threes a game. Shooting

0:33:54.920 --> 0:34:01.120
<v Speaker 1>nine a game. I mean, I like Wimby's a Wimby's

0:34:01.160 --> 0:34:04.000
<v Speaker 1>shot diet and I don't like that term, but it's

0:34:04.040 --> 0:34:08.560
<v Speaker 1>become like a new term. Shot Diet needs to get

0:34:09.200 --> 0:34:12.880
<v Speaker 1>needs to reflect a little bit more that he's the

0:34:12.920 --> 0:34:15.319
<v Speaker 1>tallest guy on the court by six inches most of

0:34:15.360 --> 0:34:22.240
<v Speaker 1>the time. And so I the the spurs you take, Harper,

0:34:22.320 --> 0:34:30.160
<v Speaker 1>you figure it out later, but you don't. Those three

0:34:30.239 --> 0:34:33.560
<v Speaker 1>guys are not going to be there, you know, forever

0:34:33.880 --> 0:34:36.880
<v Speaker 1>what I know? Oh, by the way, like, rate, subscribe, review.

0:34:36.920 --> 0:34:39.280
<v Speaker 1>If you're watching on YouTube, click the like button. Please.

0:34:39.280 --> 0:34:41.799
<v Speaker 1>If you're watching on YouTube, not subscribe, please subscribe and

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:44.440
<v Speaker 1>subscribe to us on iTunes and Spotify. We have a

0:34:44.480 --> 0:34:47.920
<v Speaker 1>live question from someone watching on YouTube.

0:34:48.160 --> 0:34:50.279
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, RULESAI, what about Devin vessel.

0:34:51.280 --> 0:34:55.719
<v Speaker 1>Vecell, So listen, I the no all good? I yeah,

0:34:55.760 --> 0:34:59.359
<v Speaker 1>I mean he's right now. I think their fifth most

0:34:59.480 --> 0:35:04.279
<v Speaker 1>valuable piece, if you will, like he is, Wimby is

0:35:04.360 --> 0:35:10.920
<v Speaker 1>their most valuable piece with a bullet huge gap, and

0:35:10.920 --> 0:35:13.960
<v Speaker 1>then Dylan Harper is now their second most valuable piece

0:35:14.600 --> 0:35:20.400
<v Speaker 1>with a bullet huge gap. And then Castle Fox is

0:35:20.480 --> 0:35:23.520
<v Speaker 1>kind of eye of the beholder. I don't think Castle

0:35:23.600 --> 0:35:28.160
<v Speaker 1>will ever be as good as Dearn Fox. But dude,

0:35:28.280 --> 0:35:30.759
<v Speaker 1>is the fact that Castle is so much younger and

0:35:30.800 --> 0:35:32.880
<v Speaker 1>for at least the next three years on such a

0:35:32.920 --> 0:35:37.279
<v Speaker 1>great contract, and Fox is a guy you're probably gonna

0:35:37.320 --> 0:35:40.600
<v Speaker 1>have to max out, you know, or come close to

0:35:40.640 --> 0:35:44.319
<v Speaker 1>it a year from now. Does that make him more

0:35:44.440 --> 0:35:48.160
<v Speaker 1>valuable than to that team than to others or you know,

0:35:48.760 --> 0:35:56.520
<v Speaker 1>two different teams. And so I think that I think

0:35:56.640 --> 0:36:05.200
<v Speaker 1>the Spurs have very interesting choices ahead of them, but

0:36:06.440 --> 0:36:11.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm very confident that their long term plan is not

0:36:12.719 --> 0:36:18.120
<v Speaker 1>Castle Fox Harper. I also think it's totally fair, and

0:36:18.239 --> 0:36:21.759
<v Speaker 1>it's not totally fair. I know I'm right. When they

0:36:21.880 --> 0:36:25.239
<v Speaker 1>traded for Fox, they didn't think they were gonna get

0:36:25.280 --> 0:36:28.280
<v Speaker 1>the second pick of the draft. When they traded for Fox,

0:36:28.320 --> 0:36:30.239
<v Speaker 1>Wmby was still healthy. They were fighting to get to

0:36:30.320 --> 0:36:34.680
<v Speaker 1>play in They didn't think, you know, we're our point

0:36:34.680 --> 0:36:38.239
<v Speaker 1>guard of the next decade is gonna be taken care

0:36:38.320 --> 0:36:41.520
<v Speaker 1>of in this draft. In Dylan Harper, it's just how

0:36:41.520 --> 0:36:43.239
<v Speaker 1>it turned out, all right, Let's get to the rest

0:36:43.239 --> 0:36:44.839
<v Speaker 1>of the West, demase, So.

0:36:44.880 --> 0:36:47.799
<v Speaker 2>The West is as dangerous as ever. Obviously, Katie just

0:36:47.840 --> 0:36:50.280
<v Speaker 2>went to the Rockets. It's gonna be the Lakers first

0:36:50.280 --> 0:36:52.960
<v Speaker 2>full season with Luca, and teams like Spurs and the

0:36:52.960 --> 0:36:54.080
<v Speaker 2>MAVs could take the leap.

0:36:54.840 --> 0:36:56.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah. Who are the best players? Who are the real

0:36:56.760 --> 0:36:57.520
<v Speaker 3>players in the West?

0:36:58.280 --> 0:37:03.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So listen. I did this a bit on I

0:37:03.560 --> 0:37:07.440
<v Speaker 1>think there is a it's clearly Oklahoma City at the top,

0:37:08.560 --> 0:37:11.040
<v Speaker 1>but I think the next best two teams are the

0:37:11.120 --> 0:37:18.320
<v Speaker 1>Rockets and the Lakers. And I the LUCA over correction.

0:37:18.600 --> 0:37:22.239
<v Speaker 1>Negativity has gone too far. And I did this on

0:37:22.320 --> 0:37:25.440
<v Speaker 1>the TV show yesterday. I just want to reiterate it.

0:37:26.280 --> 0:37:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Luca five best players in the league. Okay, Joker is thirty,

0:37:33.440 --> 0:37:37.000
<v Speaker 1>he won his title at twenty eight. Giannis is thirty,

0:37:37.360 --> 0:37:41.200
<v Speaker 1>he won his title at twenty six. Tatum is twenty seven.

0:37:41.600 --> 0:37:45.560
<v Speaker 1>He won his title at twenty six. Shay is twenty six,

0:37:45.960 --> 0:37:49.080
<v Speaker 1>turns twenty seven in two weeks. He just won the title.

0:37:49.400 --> 0:37:52.960
<v Speaker 1>Luca the youngest of all of them, twenty six, will

0:37:53.000 --> 0:37:56.200
<v Speaker 1>be twenty six during the first couple months of next season.

0:37:56.719 --> 0:37:59.719
<v Speaker 1>The idea that he is behind schedule or off schedule

0:38:00.800 --> 0:38:06.680
<v Speaker 1>is incorrect right now, Shae understandably, his star could not

0:38:06.760 --> 0:38:10.760
<v Speaker 1>be shining brighter. I get that, and he deserves it. However,

0:38:13.719 --> 0:38:18.440
<v Speaker 1>and we also can't compare Luca and Shae career numbers

0:38:18.760 --> 0:38:21.799
<v Speaker 1>because Luca was good instantly and Shae grew into it.

0:38:22.160 --> 0:38:25.800
<v Speaker 1>So if we simply just take the last two years

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:29.279
<v Speaker 1>for Shay, which are far and away the best two

0:38:29.360 --> 0:38:32.520
<v Speaker 1>years of his career, and compare them to the last

0:38:32.560 --> 0:38:35.719
<v Speaker 1>two years for Luca, which includes far and away the

0:38:35.760 --> 0:38:38.360
<v Speaker 1>worst year of his career. This past year, the numbers

0:38:38.400 --> 0:38:43.520
<v Speaker 1>are identical. Playoffs and regular season identical, except for Luca

0:38:44.880 --> 0:38:48.359
<v Speaker 1>beats him in assists considerably and rebounds by a bit,

0:38:48.680 --> 0:38:52.520
<v Speaker 1>but the scoring and efficiencies are nearly identical. One guy

0:38:52.719 --> 0:38:57.359
<v Speaker 1>made the finals demanse and lost to a team some

0:38:57.400 --> 0:39:01.320
<v Speaker 1>people thought was going to turn into a dynasty in Boston.

0:39:01.640 --> 0:39:05.040
<v Speaker 1>The other guy made the finals and went seven with

0:39:05.160 --> 0:39:08.759
<v Speaker 1>a team people thought was the most unlikely finalist in

0:39:09.520 --> 0:39:12.560
<v Speaker 1>modern NBA history. So to add like, I don't think

0:39:12.560 --> 0:39:14.160
<v Speaker 1>it's fair to be like, well, you can win with

0:39:14.200 --> 0:39:17.480
<v Speaker 1>one guy, you can't win with the other. Now, Shay

0:39:17.600 --> 0:39:20.080
<v Speaker 1>is coming off as best year, Lucas coming off his worst.

0:39:20.440 --> 0:39:25.799
<v Speaker 1>That's undeniable, but it is there's too big of a

0:39:26.200 --> 0:39:30.880
<v Speaker 1>discussion gap amongst the two. So that's one of the

0:39:30.920 --> 0:39:33.799
<v Speaker 1>reasons that I am a believer in the Lakers, and

0:39:33.800 --> 0:39:36.279
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna do this in reverse order three two. One

0:39:36.960 --> 0:39:41.480
<v Speaker 1>second reason I'm a believer in the Lakers is I

0:39:41.640 --> 0:39:45.279
<v Speaker 1>do think they are going to make a substantial move

0:39:46.320 --> 0:39:48.960
<v Speaker 1>in the next week. I think they are going to

0:39:49.160 --> 0:39:53.400
<v Speaker 1>address some of their roster holes, and I think they

0:39:53.440 --> 0:39:56.640
<v Speaker 1>have the assets to do it. And the last reason

0:39:57.320 --> 0:40:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm a believer in the Lakers is, let me call

0:40:04.600 --> 0:40:17.520
<v Speaker 1>it a informed opinion that people that think Lebron is

0:40:17.680 --> 0:40:23.920
<v Speaker 1>resigned to the idea that he's not like that making

0:40:24.560 --> 0:40:28.040
<v Speaker 1>finals and competing for championships, that that phase of his

0:40:28.120 --> 0:40:38.960
<v Speaker 1>career is over, are unabashedly, unequivocally wrong. Now, maybe if

0:40:39.000 --> 0:40:42.120
<v Speaker 1>your opinion is whatever he thinks is going on, you

0:40:42.120 --> 0:40:45.040
<v Speaker 1>know doesn't matter, you know that phase is over. That's

0:40:45.040 --> 0:40:47.960
<v Speaker 1>an opinion and you're allowed to have. But if you

0:40:48.080 --> 0:40:51.279
<v Speaker 1>think Lebron is like, Okay, at this point, it's just

0:40:51.320 --> 0:40:54.760
<v Speaker 1>about playing with my son, you know, at some point

0:40:54.800 --> 0:41:00.359
<v Speaker 1>having a farewell tour. I love the game. You can

0:41:00.400 --> 0:41:07.600
<v Speaker 1>debt that right now. And I think these finals and

0:41:07.760 --> 0:41:18.600
<v Speaker 1>watching Oklahoma City struggle with Indiana and watching what these

0:41:18.680 --> 0:41:27.520
<v Speaker 1>finals looked like. Only Surge emboldened Lebron to feel like

0:41:28.600 --> 0:41:31.840
<v Speaker 1>I can get back there. And so if you have

0:41:33.040 --> 0:41:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Chip on his shoulder, Luca wants one last dance at

0:41:38.080 --> 0:41:42.040
<v Speaker 1>some point deep in the postseason. Lebron and some slight

0:41:42.160 --> 0:41:47.120
<v Speaker 1>roster tweaking, that to me makes the Lakers a contender.

0:41:47.440 --> 0:41:49.000
<v Speaker 3>You think Austin Reeves is there next year?

0:41:52.480 --> 0:41:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Probably not, maybe at the beginning, probably not through the year.

0:41:56.719 --> 0:42:03.000
<v Speaker 1>I just think Austin Reeves he's your most valuable, tradable asset,

0:42:03.480 --> 0:42:08.200
<v Speaker 1>and because of Luca, he's a little redundant. When you

0:42:08.239 --> 0:42:12.759
<v Speaker 1>have Anthony Davis there, Austin Reeves is critical because without

0:42:12.800 --> 0:42:16.160
<v Speaker 1>Austin Reeves, your only creators the oldest guy in the

0:42:16.239 --> 0:42:20.879
<v Speaker 1>league and Lebron. But with Luca there, he becomes. And

0:42:20.920 --> 0:42:24.080
<v Speaker 1>I really like Austin. I you know what I mean.

0:42:24.120 --> 0:42:26.799
<v Speaker 1>The I was the first person tell you Austin Rives

0:42:26.920 --> 0:42:32.200
<v Speaker 1>better than Bradley Beal. Everybody called me crazy, but I

0:42:32.280 --> 0:42:38.000
<v Speaker 1>just think sometimes he is right now a luxury and

0:42:38.040 --> 0:42:41.440
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers have some necessities. So I would put if

0:42:41.440 --> 0:42:44.359
<v Speaker 1>I were stacking it, I should have started. I think

0:42:44.400 --> 0:42:47.200
<v Speaker 1>the Nuggets, I should have said included them. I think

0:42:47.200 --> 0:42:50.520
<v Speaker 1>they are a real player based off the strength of

0:42:50.600 --> 0:42:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Yokich alone, and I think they will, you know, manicure

0:42:56.040 --> 0:43:01.080
<v Speaker 1>around the edges, and maybe they were over Michael Malone

0:43:01.480 --> 0:43:03.680
<v Speaker 1>and maybe what we saw them do in the playoffs

0:43:03.719 --> 0:43:06.720
<v Speaker 1>under Adlman is something sustainable. And then we see Michael

0:43:06.760 --> 0:43:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Porter Junior come back healthy and Aaron Gordon come back healthy.

0:43:10.480 --> 0:43:13.560
<v Speaker 1>So I'd have them for Lakers three. The Rockets, to

0:43:13.640 --> 0:43:18.720
<v Speaker 1>me are they can win the championship. And I say

0:43:18.719 --> 0:43:23.200
<v Speaker 1>this with no disrespect du to Oklahoma City at all,

0:43:23.960 --> 0:43:33.400
<v Speaker 1>but man a Lakers Rockets Western Conference Finals, which I

0:43:33.680 --> 0:43:39.160
<v Speaker 1>think check me on this, producers. I think we got

0:43:39.200 --> 0:43:43.600
<v Speaker 1>that once in league history, and it was nineteen eighty six,

0:43:44.719 --> 0:43:48.480
<v Speaker 1>a team's second year, when everyone thought we were gonna

0:43:48.480 --> 0:43:53.719
<v Speaker 1>get Lakers Celtics in the finals. Again, I know the Lakers.

0:43:54.120 --> 0:43:58.400
<v Speaker 1>The Rockets beat the Lakers in the playoffs in nineteen

0:43:58.440 --> 0:44:04.400
<v Speaker 1>eighty six. I think it was the conference finals and

0:44:05.360 --> 0:44:09.560
<v Speaker 1>the the Lakers.

0:44:10.400 --> 0:44:14.840
<v Speaker 3>Okay, the hold on the Lakers won the series.

0:44:14.880 --> 0:44:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Though, hold on a second that that's wrong. I'm just

0:44:21.080 --> 0:44:21.960
<v Speaker 1>telling you right now.

0:44:22.040 --> 0:44:25.200
<v Speaker 3>The the you asked the producer, I'm.

0:44:25.040 --> 0:44:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Telling you right now. I'm telling you right now that

0:44:28.239 --> 0:44:30.239
<v Speaker 1>reads to me. I'm about to be This is a

0:44:30.239 --> 0:44:33.640
<v Speaker 1>good lesson for everybody. PA pause the show, but stay

0:44:33.640 --> 0:44:36.080
<v Speaker 1>on the air. What they just put in the doc

0:44:36.239 --> 0:44:40.839
<v Speaker 1>reads like it was some AI bot wrote it one

0:44:40.880 --> 0:44:43.680
<v Speaker 1>thousand percent. It's what it reads like. And I'm here

0:44:43.719 --> 0:44:47.000
<v Speaker 1>telling you that AI bot doesn't know what the hell

0:44:47.000 --> 0:44:48.239
<v Speaker 1>it's talking about.

0:44:49.760 --> 0:44:49.800
<v Speaker 3>That.

0:44:51.719 --> 0:44:56.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm telling you right now you cannot trust the AI

0:44:56.360 --> 0:45:03.640
<v Speaker 1>chat bots when it comes to uh sports history. So

0:45:03.719 --> 0:45:06.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm just the I'm gonna do my thing here.

0:45:07.360 --> 0:45:08.520
<v Speaker 3>Am I gonna get good here?

0:45:09.640 --> 0:45:10.040
<v Speaker 1>Oh? Wait?

0:45:10.120 --> 0:45:13.840
<v Speaker 3>No, it says uh nineteen City versus Houston.

0:45:14.719 --> 0:45:18.040
<v Speaker 1>Okay, everybody stopped? Does everybody stop for a second?

0:45:18.080 --> 0:45:18.440
<v Speaker 3>Okay?

0:45:20.719 --> 0:45:29.720
<v Speaker 1>The the in nineteen eighty six the NBA Finals, without

0:45:29.760 --> 0:45:33.120
<v Speaker 1>a shadow of a doubt, guys, were the eighty six

0:45:33.200 --> 0:45:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Celtics maybe the greatest team ever against the chem Olajuan

0:45:38.560 --> 0:45:44.799
<v Speaker 1>Ralph Sampson Rockets. That is not up for debate. So

0:45:46.120 --> 0:45:51.960
<v Speaker 1>the I my question was was the conference finals Lakers Rockets?

0:45:52.280 --> 0:45:52.520
<v Speaker 3>All?

0:45:52.560 --> 0:45:56.480
<v Speaker 1>Look that up? The Rockets beat the Lakers in the

0:45:56.480 --> 0:46:05.440
<v Speaker 1>Conference finals. For one, guys, audience, AI chatbots don't fucking

0:46:05.520 --> 0:46:10.279
<v Speaker 1>know sports. I'm telling you right now, ask like when

0:46:10.280 --> 0:46:14.839
<v Speaker 1>you're done with the done with the show, ask an

0:46:14.880 --> 0:46:20.200
<v Speaker 1>AI chatbot, like very basic things like tell me the

0:46:20.239 --> 0:46:24.560
<v Speaker 1>top ten running backs in the NFL right now, and

0:46:24.600 --> 0:46:31.200
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna spit at you, Adrian Peterson like. So it's

0:46:31.320 --> 0:46:35.200
<v Speaker 1>just maybe they're good for some term papers, but they're

0:46:35.239 --> 0:46:39.920
<v Speaker 1>not good with sports. So the the Rockets have played

0:46:39.960 --> 0:46:46.280
<v Speaker 1>the Lakers in I the conference finals, I believe that's

0:46:46.320 --> 0:46:50.799
<v Speaker 1>the only time. I believe it's nineteen eighty six. I

0:46:50.920 --> 0:46:52.920
<v Speaker 1>know they I am looking at it now. I know they

0:46:52.920 --> 0:46:56.120
<v Speaker 1>played in nineteen eighty six, but I think that's the

0:46:56.120 --> 0:46:59.600
<v Speaker 1>only time. Sorry for the sidebar point, I was trying

0:46:59.600 --> 0:47:02.880
<v Speaker 1>to make it with no respect to Oklahoma City. A

0:47:03.000 --> 0:47:08.879
<v Speaker 1>Durant Lebron conference finals, which we've never gotten by the way,

0:47:10.160 --> 0:47:18.920
<v Speaker 1>we got it, and a Durant Lebron playoff series that

0:47:19.040 --> 0:47:22.759
<v Speaker 1>felt like a fair fight, which we've only gotten once ever,

0:47:23.560 --> 0:47:26.920
<v Speaker 1>in the twenty twelve NBA Finals, which I know listen

0:47:27.600 --> 0:47:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Bron won in five. But that was a great series

0:47:30.840 --> 0:47:35.279
<v Speaker 1>until Game five. Like those first four games all were

0:47:35.360 --> 0:47:39.239
<v Speaker 1>in the balance in the fourth quarter, and you can

0:47:39.280 --> 0:47:43.479
<v Speaker 1>say that wasn't a fair fight because the heat were

0:47:45.360 --> 0:47:49.160
<v Speaker 1>veterans and the Thunder were young. A fun fact that

0:47:49.320 --> 0:47:58.680
<v Speaker 1>no one believes, but it is true. Twenty the Heat

0:47:59.000 --> 0:48:02.479
<v Speaker 1>over the MAVs they lost in twenty eleven. The Heat

0:48:02.520 --> 0:48:07.320
<v Speaker 1>were the same size favorite over the MAVs in twenty eleven,

0:48:07.840 --> 0:48:13.240
<v Speaker 1>minus won seventy five as the Thunder were over the Heat.

0:48:14.520 --> 0:48:17.640
<v Speaker 1>When the Heat won their first title with Lebron and

0:48:17.680 --> 0:48:22.040
<v Speaker 1>Wade in twenty twelve, the Thunder were minus won seventy

0:48:22.080 --> 0:48:25.440
<v Speaker 1>five favorites going into those finals because the Heat, remember

0:48:25.480 --> 0:48:28.480
<v Speaker 1>they had lost the year before, and they had damn

0:48:28.520 --> 0:48:31.360
<v Speaker 1>near lost to Boston, and the Thunder had just like

0:48:31.800 --> 0:48:37.680
<v Speaker 1>exploded onto the scene and become this seemingly unstoppable force

0:48:37.719 --> 0:48:40.440
<v Speaker 1>of nature. Again, this is off top of my head,

0:48:40.800 --> 0:48:45.920
<v Speaker 1>but the that Thunder team in the conference finals played

0:48:45.960 --> 0:48:51.000
<v Speaker 1>the Spurs, who the Spurs had won demons the final

0:48:51.200 --> 0:48:55.120
<v Speaker 1>ten games of the regular season and then were ten

0:48:55.160 --> 0:48:58.080
<v Speaker 1>to zero in the playoffs, up two to zero in

0:48:58.120 --> 0:49:01.240
<v Speaker 1>the conference finals on a twin any game winning streak

0:49:01.960 --> 0:49:04.319
<v Speaker 1>and then the Thunder one four straight and made the

0:49:04.360 --> 0:49:11.000
<v Speaker 1>finals like that Thunder team. It was like, holy shitty, yeah,

0:49:11.680 --> 0:49:17.200
<v Speaker 1>and so it was really a remarkable thing. But okay, sorry,

0:49:17.520 --> 0:49:20.439
<v Speaker 1>we're way off topic. The point I'm trying to make

0:49:20.560 --> 0:49:22.680
<v Speaker 1>is I think the Rockets have all the pieces you

0:49:22.760 --> 0:49:24.000
<v Speaker 1>need if Durant stays healthy.

0:49:24.480 --> 0:49:24.719
<v Speaker 3>Yeah.

0:49:25.000 --> 0:49:30.000
<v Speaker 1>I like Shingoon as the fulcrum of the offense. I

0:49:30.160 --> 0:49:35.319
<v Speaker 1>like that Durant ads scoring. I think they're gonna get

0:49:35.320 --> 0:49:39.040
<v Speaker 1>more from Shephard. I think Udoaka is excellent. I like

0:49:39.120 --> 0:49:47.000
<v Speaker 1>all of it. And then there's Oklahoma City that has

0:49:47.960 --> 0:49:54.320
<v Speaker 1>everyone coming back and everyone but Crusoe is super young

0:49:54.920 --> 0:50:00.160
<v Speaker 1>and should only get better. But there's a lot of

0:50:01.200 --> 0:50:04.720
<v Speaker 1>plays to balance there. One hundred and five game season.

0:50:05.440 --> 0:50:10.719
<v Speaker 1>Are you satisfied after a championship? You know, does the

0:50:12.080 --> 0:50:16.920
<v Speaker 1>Oklahoma City got lucky? All putting quotes that the injury

0:50:16.960 --> 0:50:21.880
<v Speaker 1>bug hit them early instead of late, Like, it's not

0:50:22.040 --> 0:50:25.480
<v Speaker 1>right to say Oklahoma City, you know, had great injury

0:50:25.560 --> 0:50:29.680
<v Speaker 1>luck this year. They you know, key players missed real time,

0:50:31.000 --> 0:50:34.040
<v Speaker 1>but they suffered it early in the year instead of

0:50:34.080 --> 0:50:35.319
<v Speaker 1>going into the postseason.

0:50:35.680 --> 0:50:40.440
<v Speaker 3>So type of man for Katie with the Rockets.

0:50:40.440 --> 0:50:42.879
<v Speaker 2>You know, the Rockets already being a nice team, them

0:50:42.920 --> 0:50:44.759
<v Speaker 2>trying to mitigate his injuries.

0:50:45.440 --> 0:50:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, yes, and no, I would. I think you've got

0:50:53.480 --> 0:50:56.600
<v Speaker 1>to be careful with a guy who's thirty seven. I

0:50:56.719 --> 0:50:59.400
<v Speaker 1>don't think that they're going to put him on like

0:50:59.440 --> 0:51:03.640
<v Speaker 1>a sixty game plan. And I also think for a

0:51:03.640 --> 0:51:08.719
<v Speaker 1>lot of these legends, they want to be eligible for

0:51:08.800 --> 0:51:14.399
<v Speaker 1>the awards, and that sixty five game marker is like

0:51:14.480 --> 0:51:18.040
<v Speaker 1>they they want KD. I'm sure is I bet KD

0:51:18.320 --> 0:51:21.960
<v Speaker 1>is pissed that he was not eligible for All NBA

0:51:22.000 --> 0:51:24.920
<v Speaker 1>this year. It's like I played sixty two games, I

0:51:25.000 --> 0:51:28.320
<v Speaker 1>was All NBA caliber and so yet you know what

0:51:28.400 --> 0:51:30.200
<v Speaker 1>I mean. So that's what I think they'll do, all right,

0:51:30.239 --> 0:51:33.280
<v Speaker 1>real quickly, remind you, guys that this is a message

0:51:33.320 --> 0:51:37.239
<v Speaker 1>that applies to ninety nine percent of you listening right now,

0:51:37.280 --> 0:51:40.040
<v Speaker 1>because that's how many of you can be covered by

0:51:40.200 --> 0:51:44.200
<v Speaker 1>fast and reliable service on the Boost Mobile network with

0:51:44.440 --> 0:51:47.440
<v Speaker 1>ninety nine percent nationwide coverage. And if you don't think

0:51:47.480 --> 0:51:50.240
<v Speaker 1>you deserve a deal, well listen up. You've got another

0:51:50.239 --> 0:51:53.400
<v Speaker 1>thing coming right now. When you switch to Boost Mobile,

0:51:53.680 --> 0:51:57.160
<v Speaker 1>you can get iPhone fifteen with dynamic island and a

0:51:57.239 --> 0:52:01.759
<v Speaker 1>forty eight megapixel main camera for night ninety nine. That's

0:52:01.920 --> 0:52:05.760
<v Speaker 1>ninety nine dollars and ninety nine cents for iPhone fifteen

0:52:06.200 --> 0:52:10.400
<v Speaker 1>on a five G nationwide network. This may only apply

0:52:10.600 --> 0:52:13.240
<v Speaker 1>to ninety nine percent of you, But I'm one hundred

0:52:13.239 --> 0:52:16.359
<v Speaker 1>percent positive. Boost Mobile just gave all of us a

0:52:16.400 --> 0:52:20.680
<v Speaker 1>really good freaking deal in store offer thirty five dollars.

0:52:20.719 --> 0:52:24.439
<v Speaker 1>Device set up fee may apply, requires credit qualification, ID

0:52:24.640 --> 0:52:29.560
<v Speaker 1>verification and activation on sixty dollars plan taxes, extra five

0:52:29.600 --> 0:52:34.200
<v Speaker 1>G speed not available in all areas. All right, demonte,

0:52:34.280 --> 0:52:36.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's quickly get through some of this other stuff before

0:52:36.560 --> 0:52:37.000
<v Speaker 1>I got to go.

0:52:37.480 --> 0:52:40.320
<v Speaker 2>So we talked about the Halliburton Achilles injury on Tuesday.

0:52:41.000 --> 0:52:43.480
<v Speaker 2>Dame and Tatum had the same injury in the playoffs,

0:52:43.520 --> 0:52:46.000
<v Speaker 2>and a handful of other guys like Jontae Morey who

0:52:46.040 --> 0:52:48.920
<v Speaker 2>tour his during the regular season. So you're obviously not

0:52:49.000 --> 0:52:51.000
<v Speaker 2>a doctor, but what do you think of the uptick

0:52:51.080 --> 0:52:54.480
<v Speaker 2>of the Achilles injuries in the NBA?

0:52:54.840 --> 0:52:58.960
<v Speaker 1>So this used to be an old guy injury, It

0:52:59.040 --> 0:53:04.360
<v Speaker 1>doesn't seem to be that anymore, Like people suffered Achilles

0:53:04.440 --> 0:53:13.520
<v Speaker 1>tears that were old pro athletes or sorry people in

0:53:13.560 --> 0:53:17.680
<v Speaker 1>your situation, pal, where it's like guys who just didn't

0:53:17.719 --> 0:53:21.280
<v Speaker 1>do yeah time off, didn't do like you know, didn't

0:53:21.320 --> 0:53:27.280
<v Speaker 1>stretch or you do everything. But it wasn't young prime.

0:53:28.000 --> 0:53:31.040
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't people your age, like when you suffered yours

0:53:31.320 --> 0:53:34.600
<v Speaker 1>who also played basketball at he you know what I mean, right,

0:53:35.840 --> 0:53:41.399
<v Speaker 1>and had professional trainers and all of that. And so

0:53:41.560 --> 0:53:47.440
<v Speaker 1>I have heard a bunch of different theories. I don't

0:53:48.080 --> 0:53:51.520
<v Speaker 1>I this is not my theory, and I would credit

0:53:51.560 --> 0:53:54.960
<v Speaker 1>the person whose it is, but I heard it secondhand,

0:53:55.080 --> 0:53:57.200
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know if this person wanted their name

0:53:57.280 --> 0:54:00.080
<v Speaker 1>associated with it. But I think it's a fast and

0:54:00.200 --> 0:54:05.360
<v Speaker 1>eating theory, and that theory is the shoes are too good.

0:54:07.080 --> 0:54:15.759
<v Speaker 1>The theory being that in the past you slid a

0:54:15.800 --> 0:54:20.040
<v Speaker 1>bit when you planted, your shoes gave a little, and

0:54:20.200 --> 0:54:25.200
<v Speaker 1>now the grip on the bottom and the tightness in

0:54:25.360 --> 0:54:29.840
<v Speaker 1>how they work, that the shoes don't give at all,

0:54:30.400 --> 0:54:34.680
<v Speaker 1>and so the pressure puts on your joints and everything else.

0:54:35.040 --> 0:54:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I think that's interesting. I heard Doc Rivers talk about

0:54:39.400 --> 0:54:45.880
<v Speaker 1>how guys used to just play all the year round

0:54:46.000 --> 0:54:50.919
<v Speaker 1>on blacktop and everything, and because of that, their knees went,

0:54:51.680 --> 0:54:58.720
<v Speaker 1>but their achilles and everything was fine. Obviously a huge

0:54:58.760 --> 0:55:02.319
<v Speaker 1>part of it is, while the season's always been eighty

0:55:02.400 --> 0:55:06.640
<v Speaker 1>two games, the amount of movement you have to do,

0:55:06.840 --> 0:55:11.680
<v Speaker 1>particularly on defense, and with how spread out the game is,

0:55:12.360 --> 0:55:16.360
<v Speaker 1>there's just so much more start stop, that puts pressure

0:55:16.400 --> 0:55:19.000
<v Speaker 1>on it. I know some people have questioned if it's

0:55:19.000 --> 0:55:23.000
<v Speaker 1>about guys specializing in things. I saw a pretty interesting

0:55:23.760 --> 0:55:25.240
<v Speaker 1>negative Twitter video.

0:55:25.920 --> 0:55:28.880
<v Speaker 3>Say it again, the negative step or different.

0:55:29.160 --> 0:55:31.520
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, no, that's exactly what I was gonna say. We

0:55:31.600 --> 0:55:35.400
<v Speaker 1>must see the same thing that like this, this, like

0:55:35.560 --> 0:55:39.000
<v Speaker 1>net what they called a negative step, like this backward

0:55:39.040 --> 0:55:43.759
<v Speaker 1>step to get going is not something that used to

0:55:43.800 --> 0:55:46.960
<v Speaker 1>be done. And it's how a bunch of these are happening.

0:55:47.880 --> 0:55:55.080
<v Speaker 1>So I don't know. I do know that I truly

0:55:55.200 --> 0:56:01.280
<v Speaker 1>believe this needs to be at the forefront of Adam

0:56:01.360 --> 0:56:05.759
<v Speaker 1>Silver's agenda for the next eighteen months because you cannot

0:56:05.800 --> 0:56:11.759
<v Speaker 1>have the achilles in the NBA become Tommy john in baseball,

0:56:12.480 --> 0:56:17.399
<v Speaker 1>where it's just oh yeah, this half dozen guys are

0:56:17.480 --> 0:56:23.719
<v Speaker 1>out twelve to eighteen months with an achilles, and particularly

0:56:23.760 --> 0:56:29.600
<v Speaker 1>because baseball you have you know, the numbers are just

0:56:29.719 --> 0:56:32.520
<v Speaker 1>so you have more players, you have more pitchers, the

0:56:32.600 --> 0:56:33.520
<v Speaker 1>numbers are different.

0:56:36.000 --> 0:56:38.839
<v Speaker 2>But god, I don't know if we ever talked about

0:56:38.840 --> 0:56:40.839
<v Speaker 2>it on Tuesday, but do you think, like now, if

0:56:40.840 --> 0:56:43.440
<v Speaker 2>a player feels like calf tightness, it's like an instant

0:56:43.440 --> 0:56:45.600
<v Speaker 2>three months out, Like it's just like.

0:56:45.640 --> 0:56:48.919
<v Speaker 1>Not three months but I I think it's three to four.

0:56:49.480 --> 0:56:56.280
<v Speaker 1>What I was told by a long tenured NBA player

0:56:57.400 --> 0:57:03.400
<v Speaker 1>was a calf strain you have to simply take a

0:57:03.480 --> 0:57:08.760
<v Speaker 1>month off, and even if you feel like you can play,

0:57:09.440 --> 0:57:14.240
<v Speaker 1>the only way it heals is if you simply rest

0:57:14.280 --> 0:57:22.200
<v Speaker 1>it for a month. And I that seems dramatic. Now.

0:57:22.600 --> 0:57:25.560
<v Speaker 1>The other the other piece of this that I would

0:57:25.600 --> 0:57:32.720
<v Speaker 1>say is figuring out what leads to calf strains and

0:57:32.760 --> 0:57:36.919
<v Speaker 1>how to prevent those. And some of that is preventative,

0:57:37.760 --> 0:57:41.720
<v Speaker 1>Like yeah, like I know that, and again I don't know.

0:57:42.040 --> 0:57:45.880
<v Speaker 1>What I do know is that most soft tissue injuries,

0:57:45.960 --> 0:57:53.720
<v Speaker 1>not all, most are preventable, like hamstrings, groins, quads. Usually

0:57:53.760 --> 0:58:01.200
<v Speaker 1>those are. It is guys who regularly have them are

0:58:01.240 --> 0:58:04.760
<v Speaker 1>not doing all the things they need to do. I

0:58:04.880 --> 0:58:07.800
<v Speaker 1>don't know how calves work. I really don't.

0:58:08.200 --> 0:58:13.600
<v Speaker 2>Man in the NBA now mandatory joga, I don't know

0:58:13.920 --> 0:58:14.760
<v Speaker 2>for the guard.

0:58:14.520 --> 0:58:19.560
<v Speaker 1>But it is, but it is. It's stunning that this

0:58:19.640 --> 0:58:24.320
<v Speaker 1>is where we're at. And I thought Jay Caspi and

0:58:24.400 --> 0:58:27.400
<v Speaker 1>Kang had a really interesting tweet where he was like

0:58:28.560 --> 0:58:31.440
<v Speaker 1>the majority of people watching the finals have no idea

0:58:31.560 --> 0:58:34.120
<v Speaker 1>if they're watching zone or man de man defense but

0:58:34.160 --> 0:58:37.360
<v Speaker 1>they all know what an achilles tear looks like. And

0:58:37.400 --> 0:58:41.760
<v Speaker 1>I'm like, damn, that's right, Like we can all diagnose

0:58:41.800 --> 0:58:44.640
<v Speaker 1>from TV. Oh wow, look, yeah there was that thing

0:58:44.680 --> 0:58:47.240
<v Speaker 1>where you saw it snap up, go back. We're like, yep,

0:58:47.280 --> 0:58:53.000
<v Speaker 1>we know what that is. And that is in a Again,

0:58:53.520 --> 0:58:57.080
<v Speaker 1>this is not apples to apples obviously, but the same

0:58:57.120 --> 0:59:02.200
<v Speaker 1>way we know watching football when a guy the fencing posture,

0:59:02.680 --> 0:59:05.080
<v Speaker 1>we're like, oh, that's a concussion, you know what I mean,

0:59:05.120 --> 0:59:11.920
<v Speaker 1>Like we just we know it. And so John in

0:59:11.960 --> 0:59:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the chat says, more players now than ever wear low

0:59:15.520 --> 0:59:19.200
<v Speaker 1>top shoes. Yeah, I don't know, I don't know. I

0:59:19.320 --> 0:59:25.080
<v Speaker 1>do know that this should be a top top priority

0:59:25.160 --> 0:59:32.800
<v Speaker 1>for the league because the only year, the only I'll

0:59:32.840 --> 0:59:35.960
<v Speaker 1>take the NFL, which seemingly is a ratings you know,

0:59:36.000 --> 0:59:40.480
<v Speaker 1>not seemingly is a ratings behemoth, unstoppable for us. The

0:59:40.520 --> 0:59:42.920
<v Speaker 1>only year of the NFL had real ratings you know,

0:59:43.400 --> 0:59:46.240
<v Speaker 1>issues is the wrong word, but dips was the year

0:59:46.280 --> 0:59:50.240
<v Speaker 1>all those quarterbacks got hurt. People. There there is a

0:59:50.480 --> 0:59:54.920
<v Speaker 1>star and there's no league where the star power matters

0:59:54.960 --> 1:00:01.400
<v Speaker 1>more than the NBA. And out you know, the achilles

1:00:01.480 --> 1:00:05.480
<v Speaker 1>not a quick one either, Like what has changed is

1:00:06.280 --> 1:00:09.480
<v Speaker 1>we have seen guys come back and be as good

1:00:09.640 --> 1:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>as they were. What has not changed is it's twelve

1:00:13.680 --> 1:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>to eighteen months. You look at me skeptical about as

1:00:17.720 --> 1:00:18.440
<v Speaker 1>good as they were.

1:00:18.560 --> 1:00:20.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, I was about to say, I think it's actually

1:00:20.320 --> 1:00:23.160
<v Speaker 2>been pretty rare. But the guys Katie's like the only

1:00:23.200 --> 1:00:26.120
<v Speaker 2>person I think that's torn as Achilles recently that like

1:00:26.200 --> 1:00:28.600
<v Speaker 2>came back and was the same or a little bit

1:00:28.680 --> 1:00:30.600
<v Speaker 2>better than when here Achilles.

1:00:31.440 --> 1:00:35.080
<v Speaker 1>So no, that's fair. But again in the past that

1:00:37.280 --> 1:00:39.680
<v Speaker 1>it was old guys, so you'dn't expect him to be better.

1:00:40.120 --> 1:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>The only other like Star that I'm thinking of that

1:00:42.800 --> 1:00:45.960
<v Speaker 1>we've seen the full run of other than KD is Clay.

1:00:46.080 --> 1:00:50.360
<v Speaker 1>But Clay suffered multiple catastrophicyuries in the same lay, you

1:00:50.440 --> 1:00:52.960
<v Speaker 1>know what I mean. So that's a different situation. I

1:00:53.000 --> 1:00:55.920
<v Speaker 1>do think Tatum will be like old Tatum. I do.

1:00:56.000 --> 1:01:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Maybe I'm wrong, But but what doesn't What hasn't changed,

1:01:01.720 --> 1:01:05.840
<v Speaker 1>demon'say is oh and now you're back in six months, right,

1:01:06.000 --> 1:01:10.560
<v Speaker 1>Like that's not that's not been the case. All right,

1:01:10.640 --> 1:01:13.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's go to Joker real quick before we.

1:01:13.440 --> 1:01:17.440
<v Speaker 2>Go, uh So, Nuggets president Josh Crockey had some interesting

1:01:17.520 --> 1:01:18.440
<v Speaker 2>things to say.

1:01:19.760 --> 1:01:22.240
<v Speaker 3>So, Yeah, he says, I think that.

1:01:22.200 --> 1:01:24.160
<v Speaker 2>There are rules around it that we need to be

1:01:24.280 --> 1:01:27.680
<v Speaker 2>very careful of with our injury history. The wrong person

1:01:27.720 --> 1:01:29.960
<v Speaker 2>gets injured, and very quickly you're into a scenario that

1:01:30.000 --> 1:01:33.240
<v Speaker 2>I never want to contemplate, and that's trading number fifteen.

1:01:33.800 --> 1:01:35.840
<v Speaker 2>So he tried to clarify that they do plan on

1:01:35.920 --> 1:01:38.320
<v Speaker 2>extending him. But what will be the purpose in saying

1:01:38.320 --> 1:01:38.960
<v Speaker 2>something like this.

1:01:39.640 --> 1:01:41.200
<v Speaker 1>I think it's a big mistake. I think he made

1:01:41.200 --> 1:01:45.880
<v Speaker 1>a big mistake. And I when I say a big mistake,

1:01:45.920 --> 1:01:48.160
<v Speaker 1>I don't mean like you can't recover from it. But

1:01:48.200 --> 1:01:53.280
<v Speaker 1>I think it is a significant mistake that he needs

1:01:53.320 --> 1:01:56.360
<v Speaker 1>to clean up with Joker Joker right, because what he's

1:01:56.440 --> 1:02:00.440
<v Speaker 1>talking about. If I'm Joker and I guess off my

1:02:00.520 --> 1:02:06.480
<v Speaker 1>horse and somebody shows me this clip, I reason, I

1:02:06.480 --> 1:02:08.800
<v Speaker 1>think it's totally reasonable for him to be like, hold

1:02:08.800 --> 1:02:13.920
<v Speaker 1>on a second, what you're saying there is are you

1:02:14.080 --> 1:02:19.480
<v Speaker 1>telling me there is a scenario where I want to

1:02:19.520 --> 1:02:23.720
<v Speaker 1>be a nugget and you guys decide you're trading me?

1:02:24.760 --> 1:02:28.320
<v Speaker 1>Because I didn't think that's the deal we had. I

1:02:28.360 --> 1:02:30.440
<v Speaker 1>thought the deal we had was as long as I

1:02:30.480 --> 1:02:34.800
<v Speaker 1>want to be here, I will be here and and

1:02:34.880 --> 1:02:38.440
<v Speaker 1>so like the and I know Kronky's like it's you know,

1:02:38.480 --> 1:02:43.320
<v Speaker 1>it's only a catastrophe whatever. Like if I'm Joker, I'm like,

1:02:43.360 --> 1:02:45.280
<v Speaker 1>that's not how this works. Just so you know, the

1:02:45.320 --> 1:02:48.760
<v Speaker 1>way this works is the only way you guys trade

1:02:48.800 --> 1:02:50.840
<v Speaker 1>me is if I come to you and say trade me.

1:02:51.240 --> 1:02:53.760
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, I expect if I do that

1:02:54.080 --> 1:02:57.000
<v Speaker 1>for you guys to be like please please, mister Joker

1:02:57.040 --> 1:03:04.120
<v Speaker 1>or no, like no, no, no, and so uh I

1:03:04.240 --> 1:03:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the you can ask the follow up here if you'd like.

1:03:07.000 --> 1:03:09.320
<v Speaker 2>On a scale one to ten, how scared your producer

1:03:09.400 --> 1:03:11.960
<v Speaker 2>Daniel will be about the Nuggets messing this up somehow?

1:03:13.840 --> 1:03:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, I I think they've already kind of messed it

1:03:18.400 --> 1:03:20.400
<v Speaker 1>up over the last couple of years and not really

1:03:20.520 --> 1:03:24.040
<v Speaker 1>letting him defend his title in full. I don't think

1:03:24.480 --> 1:03:27.640
<v Speaker 1>they're going to trade Joker, but I do think that

1:03:28.520 --> 1:03:31.920
<v Speaker 1>they need to tighten up, Like I just think they

1:03:31.960 --> 1:03:34.760
<v Speaker 1>need to tighten up. Argent says, should the Bucks trade

1:03:34.800 --> 1:03:37.720
<v Speaker 1>be honest for jokers? Straight up? Denver would not do that?

1:03:38.080 --> 1:03:43.080
<v Speaker 1>The Bucks would do that, like the I think that

1:03:43.920 --> 1:03:45.080
<v Speaker 1>right now.

1:03:45.640 --> 1:03:50.800
<v Speaker 3>There are what would they for jokers? Straight up? The

1:03:50.960 --> 1:03:53.440
<v Speaker 3>Bucks would would take Joker over you honest.

1:03:55.280 --> 1:03:59.480
<v Speaker 1>Uh, yes, because of the contract. I do think Jokers

1:03:59.480 --> 1:04:02.760
<v Speaker 1>are slightly better player at this point, and because they

1:04:02.840 --> 1:04:08.680
<v Speaker 1>might have to trade Giannis anyways either way, and they

1:04:08.680 --> 1:04:10.960
<v Speaker 1>don't have their own pick so they can't tank. I

1:04:11.000 --> 1:04:13.920
<v Speaker 1>think there are right now. I think there are three

1:04:14.040 --> 1:04:20.680
<v Speaker 1>players that teams would not trade straight up for Giannis, Joker, Shay,

1:04:20.760 --> 1:04:23.680
<v Speaker 1>and Luca. And it's not to say, by the way,

1:04:23.880 --> 1:04:26.360
<v Speaker 1>Shay and Luca are better than Yannis. I don't actually

1:04:26.360 --> 1:04:30.080
<v Speaker 1>think they are necessarily. I'm just telling you because of

1:04:30.120 --> 1:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>the age difference, and Shay obviously just won the title

1:04:33.520 --> 1:04:39.240
<v Speaker 1>of that stuff, they wouldn't trade him them for for Joker. Oh,

1:04:39.360 --> 1:04:43.280
<v Speaker 1>Wimby as well, Thank you, Daniel Wimby as well. Wimby.

1:04:43.800 --> 1:04:46.160
<v Speaker 1>I didn't think about that because you couldn't trade him

1:04:46.160 --> 1:04:50.200
<v Speaker 1>straight up because the salaries. But yeah, Wimby, I don't think.

1:04:53.640 --> 1:04:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't think san Antonio would trade Wimby for Joker.

1:05:00.680 --> 1:05:04.560
<v Speaker 1>I think Jokers like that's an interest. I don't think

1:05:04.600 --> 1:05:08.560
<v Speaker 1>they would. Maybe they would, but I don't think they would.

1:05:08.760 --> 1:05:10.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, let's do Aaron Rodgers real quick for it.

1:05:10.680 --> 1:05:12.000
<v Speaker 1>We get to the listener questions.

1:05:12.480 --> 1:05:16.000
<v Speaker 2>He's hinting at retirement against that time of year, he said,

1:05:16.080 --> 1:05:18.840
<v Speaker 2>I'm pretty sure that this is my last season. That's

1:05:18.880 --> 1:05:20.920
<v Speaker 2>why I just did a one year deal. Do you

1:05:20.960 --> 1:05:23.240
<v Speaker 2>believe him?

1:05:23.320 --> 1:05:25.640
<v Speaker 1>So here's the thing. I do think this is Aaron

1:05:25.720 --> 1:05:30.360
<v Speaker 1>rodgers last year. I also do not think Aaron Rodgers

1:05:30.400 --> 1:05:32.800
<v Speaker 1>is a credible narrator, and I think the media needs

1:05:32.800 --> 1:05:35.640
<v Speaker 1>stop treating him like a credible narrator, even of his

1:05:35.680 --> 1:05:42.680
<v Speaker 1>own life, because within five minutes of him saying I'm

1:05:42.680 --> 1:05:47.000
<v Speaker 1>pretty sure this is my last season, he also said, paraphrasing,

1:05:47.120 --> 1:05:49.600
<v Speaker 1>he doesn't like being in the public eye, and when

1:05:49.600 --> 1:05:52.240
<v Speaker 1>he's done playing football, he won't be in the public

1:05:52.280 --> 1:05:54.280
<v Speaker 1>eye anymore. And the only reason he is in the

1:05:54.280 --> 1:05:56.880
<v Speaker 1>public eye is because he's playing football, which is just

1:05:56.920 --> 1:06:00.000
<v Speaker 1>an uproarious comment from a guy who, in the last

1:06:00.000 --> 1:06:04.360
<v Speaker 1>thirty six months has tried to become the full time

1:06:04.400 --> 1:06:07.840
<v Speaker 1>host of Jeopardy when that did not work out, flirted

1:06:07.840 --> 1:06:11.840
<v Speaker 1>with becoming the vice president of the United States. And

1:06:11.960 --> 1:06:14.720
<v Speaker 1>one of the reasons we know about those things is

1:06:14.760 --> 1:06:19.440
<v Speaker 1>because they were discussed in the documentary about Aaron Rodgers

1:06:19.520 --> 1:06:24.800
<v Speaker 1>produced by Aaron Rodgers. Like Nothing screams whoa, whoa, WHOA?

1:06:24.960 --> 1:06:29.480
<v Speaker 1>I hate this intention, like you personally paying a camera

1:06:29.600 --> 1:06:34.160
<v Speaker 1>crew to follow you around to create a movie about you. Like,

1:06:34.720 --> 1:06:39.200
<v Speaker 1>So I just don't. I don't find him to be

1:06:39.960 --> 1:06:49.280
<v Speaker 1>a credible narrator of his own events. And also, and

1:06:49.360 --> 1:06:56.920
<v Speaker 1>I'm just going to wink at this, do you guys,

1:06:57.000 --> 1:07:03.240
<v Speaker 1>remember when Aaron Rodd was asked, of course you do,

1:07:04.560 --> 1:07:07.080
<v Speaker 1>because he thinks this is the end all, be all

1:07:07.160 --> 1:07:10.120
<v Speaker 1>of any issue anyone could possibly have with him. Is

1:07:10.160 --> 1:07:13.480
<v Speaker 1>this one comment? Because God knows, he hasn't done anything else.

1:07:14.120 --> 1:07:21.080
<v Speaker 1>Wildly aggravating when he was asked if he had gotten

1:07:21.120 --> 1:07:25.160
<v Speaker 1>the vaccine and he said, yeah, I've been, I've been well,

1:07:25.160 --> 1:07:28.880
<v Speaker 1>he didn't say hey, he said I've been immunized. And

1:07:28.920 --> 1:07:31.200
<v Speaker 1>then he was like, I didn't lie to you, guys,

1:07:35.240 --> 1:07:44.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm not I'm not saying anything I am saying. There

1:07:44.320 --> 1:07:52.200
<v Speaker 1>was a very similar turn of phrase about at his

1:07:52.440 --> 1:07:59.400
<v Speaker 1>introductory press conference about his wedding ring that I found interesting,

1:08:00.480 --> 1:08:04.200
<v Speaker 1>that's all. I just found it interesting. And so I

1:08:04.360 --> 1:08:08.160
<v Speaker 1>just don't find Aaron to be a reliable narrator of

1:08:08.240 --> 1:08:12.880
<v Speaker 1>events you care to share. Well, he was asked what

1:08:12.920 --> 1:08:16.599
<v Speaker 1>he was wearing and he said, it's a wedding ring

1:08:17.040 --> 1:08:19.000
<v Speaker 1>or somebody said, is that a wedding ring? And he

1:08:19.040 --> 1:08:24.479
<v Speaker 1>said yes, But I I know, I know what for

1:08:24.600 --> 1:08:29.320
<v Speaker 1>everyone else that would mean. I also know that it

1:08:29.360 --> 1:08:32.200
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't necessarily be a lie.

1:08:34.080 --> 1:08:34.679
<v Speaker 3>I'm not married.

1:08:35.320 --> 1:08:38.360
<v Speaker 1>Again, I didn't say I didn't say all that. I'm

1:08:38.400 --> 1:08:42.400
<v Speaker 1>just simply saying that it's that's all. That's all that

1:08:42.439 --> 1:08:47.480
<v Speaker 1>he said. And so I find I find all that fascinating.

1:08:47.680 --> 1:08:50.639
<v Speaker 1>But again, I'm sure Aaron hates this because he hates

1:08:50.680 --> 1:08:53.599
<v Speaker 1>the attention. All right, let's do some listener questions real quick.

1:08:54.120 --> 1:08:57.439
<v Speaker 3>Mary asked, isn't there a snake watcher like for dogs

1:08:57.439 --> 1:08:57.880
<v Speaker 3>and kids?

1:08:59.120 --> 1:09:02.519
<v Speaker 1>I mean, maybe you have to let someone in your apartment.

1:09:02.560 --> 1:09:04.120
<v Speaker 1>We didn't set this up the other time.

1:09:04.600 --> 1:09:08.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no, I don't. I don't. I don't think there's Yeah,

1:09:08.120 --> 1:09:08.439
<v Speaker 3>I don't.

1:09:08.479 --> 1:09:11.280
<v Speaker 2>I really appreciate that, Mary, But yeah, I'm just kind

1:09:11.280 --> 1:09:13.200
<v Speaker 2>of banking on the week being gone.

1:09:13.240 --> 1:09:14.880
<v Speaker 3>You know, it's not gonna spread. I'm gonna check on

1:09:14.920 --> 1:09:15.759
<v Speaker 3>every the day before.

1:09:16.080 --> 1:09:18.400
<v Speaker 2>It's gonna be good. It's gonna be good. And also

1:09:18.439 --> 1:09:20.920
<v Speaker 2>I have homies out here. If it really comes down

1:09:20.920 --> 1:09:24.960
<v Speaker 2>to it, of course, But uh, and Noah asks which

1:09:25.000 --> 1:09:28.120
<v Speaker 2>Western conference big versus Guard is more likely to be

1:09:28.200 --> 1:09:31.479
<v Speaker 2>the new Kobe versus Duncan for this era, Wimby versus

1:09:31.560 --> 1:09:33.400
<v Speaker 2>SGA or Wimby versus Luca.

1:09:34.120 --> 1:09:37.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean I would say Wimby versus Luca, but I'm

1:09:37.080 --> 1:09:41.400
<v Speaker 1>again I'm a Luca guy. The All right, let's go

1:09:41.400 --> 1:09:42.960
<v Speaker 1>to John and then we gotta get out of here.

1:09:43.280 --> 1:09:45.639
<v Speaker 3>John ass who do you see flag behind?

1:09:46.000 --> 1:09:46.120
<v Speaker 1>Uh?

1:09:46.240 --> 1:09:48.559
<v Speaker 2>Or who do you see flag being? Like in the future,

1:09:48.600 --> 1:09:51.640
<v Speaker 2>I feel like he gets better defensively. We got another pivot.

1:09:55.040 --> 1:09:58.320
<v Speaker 1>Listen, Scottie Pippens one of the greatest perimeter defenders of

1:09:58.360 --> 1:10:00.439
<v Speaker 1>all time. That's to me too big of an but

1:10:00.520 --> 1:10:04.960
<v Speaker 1>he also should be a better offensive player than Pippen.

1:10:05.600 --> 1:10:15.680
<v Speaker 1>So like who is who is the the the I

1:10:15.720 --> 1:10:20.040
<v Speaker 1>don't know. I I don't know what the comp We

1:10:20.080 --> 1:10:22.160
<v Speaker 1>don't need to read that last one. I don't know

1:10:22.200 --> 1:10:26.479
<v Speaker 1>what the comp is for Flag. I do. I know

1:10:26.600 --> 1:10:28.240
<v Speaker 1>that they're gonna hope he can be a you know,

1:10:28.280 --> 1:10:31.800
<v Speaker 1>a do it all point forward type. But I think

1:10:31.840 --> 1:10:38.160
<v Speaker 1>people throw around the Pippen defensive uh comps to Willy

1:10:38.280 --> 1:10:42.600
<v Speaker 1>Nilly like the like Jada Jalen Williams for the thunder

1:10:43.880 --> 1:10:46.679
<v Speaker 1>he should he might end up. He already has had

1:10:46.880 --> 1:10:50.519
<v Speaker 1>a better offensive single playoff game than Pippen had his

1:10:50.560 --> 1:10:55.160
<v Speaker 1>whole career. But Jalen Willis will never be Scotty Pippen defensively. Scotty,

1:10:55.200 --> 1:10:58.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean Scotty Pippen had a multi year stretch where

1:10:58.040 --> 1:11:01.040
<v Speaker 1>he was every year either best, second or third best

1:11:01.040 --> 1:11:04.240
<v Speaker 1>perimeter defender in the league. Like that's to me, too

1:11:04.240 --> 1:11:07.040
<v Speaker 1>big of an ask, All right, reminder everybody like great

1:11:07.120 --> 1:11:11.200
<v Speaker 1>subscribe review all of that. We appreciate it. Great job too,

1:11:11.560 --> 1:11:14.400
<v Speaker 1>Blue Duck today, Great job to Demon's, a great job

1:11:14.439 --> 1:11:17.559
<v Speaker 1>to the volume DraftKings and boost Mobile. Terrible job by

1:11:17.560 --> 1:11:21.080
<v Speaker 1>our future AI overlords. Talk to you guys on first

1:11:21.120 --> 1:11:23.439
<v Speaker 1>things first today and then after the fourth of July.

1:11:23.560 --> 1:11:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Right here, see you guys later. What's right,