Speaker 1: Broadcasting live from the Abraham Lincoln Radio Studio of the
Speaker 1: George Washington Broadcast Center, Jack Armstrong, Joe Getty arm Strong
Speaker 1: and Jettie and now he Armstrong and Eddy later this hour.
Speaker 2: So Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson still on the circuit
Speaker 2: getting interviews about their book. We're on Stephen A. Smith's
Speaker 2: show today. When he's not yelling about basketball. I guess
Speaker 2: he's interviewing people like that. He's thinking about running for
Speaker 2: president as a Democrat.
Speaker 1: Stephen A. Smith.
Speaker 2: Anyway, Jake Tapper said they never got a single person
Speaker 2: who showed any remorse for covering up Biden's decline, not one. Wow,
Speaker 2: But we'll hear a little more of that interview later
Speaker 2: this hour.
Speaker 1: Wow. Huh, how interesting?
Speaker 2: And that's crazy given the fact that you got Trump elected.
Speaker 3: How do you not realize that? No talk about it
Speaker 3: when we talk about it. Here's a gender bending madness update.
Speaker 1: Friends, I kept hearing about this thing called the Loco.
Speaker 1: We're a brave.
Speaker 3: All of this madness is on the wayne except for
Speaker 3: in education and media. So a handful of stories having
Speaker 3: to do with gender bending madness, each of which would
Speaker 3: probably merit in an entire segment or even an hour,
Speaker 3: but we will just touch on them quickly, will you good?
Speaker 1: Go ahead. Here is and this is a very interesting story.
Speaker 3: This is a fellow who is a nurse with a
Speaker 3: specialization in psychiatric nursing.
Speaker 1: He was born female with a.
Speaker 3: Rare overtesticular disorder of sex development and has lived as
Speaker 3: a man since sex. He was one of that vanishingly
Speaker 3: small number of people who actually had a genetic condition
Speaker 3: that it was utterly unclear.
Speaker 1: What sex they were.
Speaker 3: Interesting anyway, but this person is Aaron is a specialist
Speaker 3: in psychiatric nursing, and he writes, when it comes to
Speaker 3: criminal justice and public safety, few issues are as contentious
Speaker 3: and is under examined as the placement of male offenders
Speaker 3: and female prisons.
Speaker 1: Well we're working on that, Aarin.
Speaker 3: But he says biological sex is the single most impacted
Speaker 3: important factor in patterns of criminality, particularly in cases of
Speaker 3: violent and sexual assault. Way, men, Yes, sorry, no way,
Speaker 3: I'm just saying I don't find it surprising, and I
Speaker 3: don't think it actually is contentious. I think it's probably,
Speaker 3: if you put it to a vote, another one of
Speaker 3: those eighty twenty ninety ten issues at least. Yeah, men,
Speaker 3: commit the vast majority of these crime, and women comprise
Speaker 3: the overwhelming majority of the victims. Again, obsecurities are well
Speaker 3: established and increasingly obscured by ideologically motivated reporting that lumps
Speaker 3: all transgender people into a single category, masking the key
Speaker 3: differences between transidentified males and females. This matters, especially when
Speaker 3: it comes to determining the risks posed by transidentified males
Speaker 3: in women's prisons and whether their behavior patterns resemble those
Speaker 3: of men or women. I'll bet you could cut to
Speaker 3: the chase instead of me doing it. But this fella,
Speaker 3: who is no crusading anti trans lunatic says, folks, you
Speaker 3: can't have males. He probably uses the term biological males
Speaker 3: or whatever. You can't have males with women in prison,
Speaker 3: especially sex offenders. It is so overwhelmingly incredibly obvious. Anybody
Speaker 3: you would think otherwise is a lunatic.
Speaker 2: I'm surprised it hasn't become a court case of cruel
Speaker 2: and unusual punishment sort of thing, violating their constitutional rights
Speaker 2: or civil liberties or something.
Speaker 1: It will. I can't believe it hasn't yet. Right, Yeah,
Speaker 1: it's terrible, And again, we can spend a lot of
Speaker 1: time on the data and everything. It's interesting. If I'm
Speaker 1: a woman in prison for.
Speaker 2: Whatever, some white collar crime maybe, and you put a
Speaker 2: dude in there with me who then rapes me, that
Speaker 2: seems like a clear cut case to me.
Speaker 1: Oh yeah, yeah, clearly absolutely.
Speaker 3: And again I'm looking at the data and it is
Speaker 3: so overwhelming, Gavin that men should not be in women's prisons. Well,
Speaker 3: let me anybody who thinks otherwise is seriously mentally ill.
Speaker 2: If this gets to Gavin Newsom, let me speak to
Speaker 2: this politically. If you want to be president of the
Speaker 2: United States, ignore the weirdos on the left and join
Speaker 2: the eighty to ninety percent to think this is crazy,
Speaker 2: you're politically fine.
Speaker 3: He dipped his well manicured toe into it. I guess
Speaker 3: it would be pedicured, wouldn't it his pedicured toe into it?
Speaker 3: You put then backed off immediately when radicals yelled at him.
Speaker 1: You think Gavin gets pedicures? Oh yeah, weekly, Moving along.
Speaker 3: We mentioned this earlier, but it is absolutely worth more attention.
Speaker 3: California has bent itself into an ideological pretzel to try
Speaker 3: to stop being embarrassed by boys stealing first place or
Speaker 3: second place or third place or whatever. At state meets
Speaker 3: from girls in girls track and field and other fields
Speaker 3: of endeavor. So this new bizarro policy, announced a couple
Speaker 3: of days ago by the California or Scholastic Federation said,
Speaker 3: under this pilot entry process, any biological female student athlete
Speaker 3: who would have earned the next qualifying mark for one
Speaker 3: of their sections automatic qualifying juries, blah blah blah, but
Speaker 3: didn't get it because there's boys participating. Well, they call
Speaker 3: them transgender athletes. They're boys. They can go ahead and
Speaker 3: we'll bring them into the competition anyway, because they would
Speaker 3: have gotten in if it weren't for the boys. And
Speaker 3: they also clarified that this new pretzel logic policy, events
Speaker 3: will score separately for transgender students, so that there now
Speaker 3: could be three first place winners in the long jump,
Speaker 3: for instance, one boy they say, biological boy, an unnecessary term.
Speaker 3: It's redundant, one trans athlete and one biological girl.
Speaker 1: All right, but I still haven't heard it nail down.
Speaker 2: Are you going to have three separate competitions or do
Speaker 2: you compete in the there's just two competitions. You compete
Speaker 2: in the one that you identify as and then you
Speaker 2: have two different winners in that competition.
Speaker 1: Well, yes, these idiot cowards.
Speaker 3: The way I understand it is you will say to
Speaker 3: the girl or to the boy who beat the girls, congratulations,
Speaker 3: frands girl, you're the first place finisher. Here's your first
Speaker 3: place metal. Then they'll turn to the actual girl, the
Speaker 3: real girl, and say, yeah, your first place too, ignoring
Speaker 3: the idiocy.
Speaker 2: So would they both be standing on the podium at
Speaker 2: equal height? Presumably?
Speaker 1: Quick question? Triple jump because that's what started this.
Speaker 2: A boy won the triple jump out jumped the girls
Speaker 2: by three feet.
Speaker 3: I think it was four, but anyway, Yeah, it was
Speaker 3: an incredible distance. Normally you win the competition by an inch. Yeah,
Speaker 3: triple jump because he's a boy? Is why you go
Speaker 3: off one foot one foot?
Speaker 1: Two feet? Correct?
Speaker 3: Left foot, right foot, both feet? Wait a minute, one
Speaker 3: or is it one two to one? I think it's
Speaker 3: one one one, yes, on one one.
Speaker 1: Oh, you don't ever jump off two feet, No, you
Speaker 1: land on two feet.
Speaker 2: So like you'd go left foot, right foot, left foot
Speaker 2: or vice versa. Okay, I don't think I I wouldn't.
Speaker 1: Definitely suggest alternating feet. Yes, this is not on the
Speaker 1: top end. If you could pull off left left, left,
Speaker 1: that would be focus.
Speaker 3: Please anyway, it was charmingly unknown in yesterdayear as the
Speaker 3: hop skipping jump. Oh yeah, anyway. Uh So, moving along
Speaker 3: a few more headlines, squeeze in. Beware parents, YMCAs all over.
Speaker 1: The country are woke.
Speaker 3: The national YMCA provides guidelines on how to create a
Speaker 3: safe space for LGBTQ plus campers. No, no, this is
Speaker 3: the actual YMCA. It leaves the implementation of facility, housing,
Speaker 3: and sports policies up to each local brands branch. So
Speaker 3: in a lot of places, your little girl is going
Speaker 3: to have a man staring at them in the locker room,
Speaker 3: in their tent, in their cabin, in their bathroom, on
Speaker 3: their sports team. Young men, best to check the YMCA's
Speaker 3: policy if before you send your child to be embraced
Speaker 3: in their warm clutches.
Speaker 1: It's not so fun to stay at the YMCA. Note
Speaker 1: from Carlsbad, California.
Speaker 3: Your parents are demanding answers after a self described BDSM
Speaker 3: expert that's bondage discipline, sadism and masochism, a lot who
Speaker 3: works at a trans surgery and hormone clinic, was invited
Speaker 3: to speak to high school students in Carlsbad during a
Speaker 3: recent week of events supporting LGBTQ plus minus mar.
Speaker 1: The school.
Speaker 3: Oh I'm telling you, well, it's it's freaking Carl's Bad
Speaker 3: public schools. Our government schools are diseased. Take your kid
Speaker 3: out and bulldoze them. I mean, as a society we
Speaker 3: should bulldoze them. Don't do it individually. That's a felony anyway.
Speaker 3: So this self described BDSM expert and representative of medical
Speaker 3: in it that provides gender transition surgeries, delivered remarks at
Speaker 3: stage Greek High School and Carlsbad during a lunchtime event
Speaker 3: to open all students.
Speaker 4: This.
Speaker 3: They them Sicko who leads class. I mean, as you
Speaker 3: click on his name, you go right to his website
Speaker 3: kink one oh one and elmrotic play and body modification
Speaker 3: and whips and chains and the rest of it.
Speaker 2: Well, we're what two days away from the schools in
Speaker 2: their last week going all nuts over June because it's
Speaker 2: Pride month and just the non stop every day some
Speaker 2: sort of assembly, march, song, flags, everywhere, thing.
Speaker 3: One more And keep this in mind, because I was
Speaker 3: surprised to learn this. Not only are a lot of
Speaker 3: the medical associations run by a very small cabal of
Speaker 3: hardcore leftist activists like the American Academy of Pediatrics the AMA.
Speaker 3: You think, wow, doctors think this, it must be right. No, no,
Speaker 3: most doctors around the country look at what the AMA
Speaker 3: announces and says, oh my god, they've lost their effing minds.
Speaker 3: This headline is taxpayer funded professional associations push puberty blockers,
Speaker 3: DEI and support for hamas. According to a watchdog organization,
Speaker 3: for instance, the Society of Health and Physical Educators of
Speaker 3: America recommends teaching eight year olds about gender identity. It's
Speaker 3: one of many recipients of federal funding that promotes radical ideologies.
Speaker 1: U shape.
Speaker 3: The Society of Health and Physical Educator Educators, which gets
Speaker 3: millions of dollars from the CDC, among other places, helped
Speaker 3: draft the National Sex Education Standards, which set age related
Speaker 3: teaching benchmarks. According to the standards, students by the end
Speaker 3: of second grade should be able to define gender identity.
Speaker 3: These are seven year olds and eight year olds and
Speaker 3: should discuss the range of ways people express their gender.
Speaker 2: I don't want it for the seniors, but the fact
Speaker 2: that it's second graders is extra insane.
Speaker 3: Radical gender theory, folks, is a fringe academic nut job
Speaker 3: Marxist theory that denies there's any difference between male and
Speaker 3: female and that everybody should pick their gender.
Speaker 1: This is not normal, it's not true, it's not scientific.
Speaker 1: It's nuts.
Speaker 2: There are high schools where you could graduate without knowing
Speaker 2: who Thomas Jefferson is, And if you do know who
Speaker 2: he is, all you know is he is a slaveholder.
Speaker 2: But they're going to make sure you've learned and they're
Speaker 2: written a paper about what gender you are.
Speaker 1: By the end of second grade.
Speaker 3: For the love of God, by the end of fifth grade,
Speaker 3: they should be able to describe, quote the potential role
Speaker 3: of hormone blockers on young people who identify as transgender,
Speaker 3: distinguish between sex assigned at birth and gender identity, and
Speaker 3: explain differences between cisgender, transgender, gender non binary, gender expansive,
Speaker 3: and gender identity. That's by the end of fifth blanking grade.
Speaker 1: Do you people know how crazy you are?
Speaker 3: I won't even get into the hardcore knowledge of various
Speaker 3: sex acts you have to know by the end of
Speaker 3: eighth grade. Maybe we'll dig more into this another time.
Speaker 3: It was a gender bending, sickening madness update.
Speaker 1: I love that. That's a good ending, right there, We
Speaker 1: got more of the waist.
Speaker 4: There Muscus promising to try again soon with another test
Speaker 4: flight every three to four weeks and the ultimate goal
Speaker 4: of reaching the Moon and Mars.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I'm on all for Elon focusing back on spaceflight.
Speaker 2: And apparently Tesla stockholders in the Tesla board really wants
Speaker 2: him to turn his attention back toward Tesla also and
Speaker 2: the other things that he does. And he also has
Speaker 2: a dozen kids that might want to see him now
Speaker 2: and then I don't know about how that whole thing works.
Speaker 2: Oh and by the way, Elon was talking about any
Speaker 2: of this moon talk now, Mars Mars Moon is just
Speaker 2: a step toward getting to Mars. We need to have
Speaker 2: a goal that is way beyond anything we've ever done before. Anyway,
Speaker 2: I won't get off on that. I'm looking forward to it.
Speaker 2: I brought up a last hour that a couple of
Speaker 2: people in my very close orbit I'll leave it there
Speaker 2: have had panic attacks recently.
Speaker 1: Must be genetic, Maybe it is, I don't know.
Speaker 2: And in my I've only known three people that like
Speaker 2: talked to me in detail about having panic attacks, and
Speaker 2: in all three cases it was just random when it
Speaker 2: would happen, which sounds horrifying. Because then you'd walk around
Speaker 2: all the time wondering if you're going to get hit
Speaker 2: with another one, and it feels like you're dying. If
Speaker 2: you don't know what a panic attack is, I've never
Speaker 2: felt one, but everybody describes it as you feel like
Speaker 2: you're dying. Anyway, we got this text. Suffered for many,
Speaker 2: many years with panic attacks and anxiety. Shoes Well, that's funny.
Speaker 2: And two examples. I know anxiety. They had a lot
Speaker 2: of anxiety. The other person that I mentioned referenced earlier,
Speaker 2: big tough guy, had no anxiety. He had nothing else
Speaker 2: other than random panic attacks. Panic attacks and panic disorder
Speaker 2: run in my family. When I was young, I would have.
Speaker 2: And the only thing that really helped is pushing your
Speaker 2: body so that all you can do is think about
Speaker 2: what you're doing. I started jogging, then running almost to exhaustion, skateboarding,
Speaker 2: building puzzles. Your body can only do one thing at
Speaker 2: a time. Talk about them. The more you talk about them,
Speaker 2: the more you realize it's not something weird and you're
Speaker 2: not alone, okay, right.
Speaker 3: And again, being able to name neuro emotional phenomenon helps
Speaker 3: if you can be clinical about it and step outside
Speaker 3: of the situation, it helps.
Speaker 1: Yeah, it seems to.
Speaker 2: In all three cases of the people that I know, well,
Speaker 2: the first one is the worst because you don't know
Speaker 2: what the hell's happening. Right after that, at least you
Speaker 2: can know I'm having another panic attack. I've had these before.
Speaker 2: I'm not actually going to die.
Speaker 1: E din know. Easier said than done.
Speaker 2: I've never had a pan attack, but like, I've had
Speaker 2: the wind knocked out of me several times, and each
Speaker 2: time I thought I was gonna die. Even though I've
Speaker 2: had it happen many many times and I knew I
Speaker 2: would get over it.
Speaker 1: While it's happening, it's not very enjoyable.
Speaker 3: Yeah, And because it's a fear response, that is, you
Speaker 3: know the understanding of it's coming along, but it's still
Speaker 3: fairly little understood. Because it's fear response, you also start
Speaker 3: to fear the fear, and so it becomes heck, weirdly
Speaker 3: self fulfilling bundle of Oh God, please know.
Speaker 1: I'm glad I don't have them. Sounds awful yet. Now
Speaker 1: you probably won't at this point in your life, but
Speaker 1: I don't. I don't. I don't think so.
Speaker 4: So.
Speaker 2: Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson wrote the book about Joe
Speaker 2: Biden's brain. Another interesting revelation today from an interview that
Speaker 2: we will discuss and you will hear coming up. But
Speaker 2: we were talking earlier.
Speaker 1: Hilariously disingenuous book.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's interesting and hilarious at the same time that
Speaker 2: you're reporting on something that everybody knew, like we didn't
Speaker 2: know it what Anyways, stay.
Speaker 1: Tuned for that.
Speaker 5: Armstrong and Getty one, for the love of God, figure
Speaker 5: out a way to get the schools open sooner. We've
Speaker 5: got very new knee jerk about this. Obviously, pay more
Speaker 5: attention to the border. That's real, and that's going to
Speaker 5: be something that you can't just like take your time
Speaker 5: to deal with. Three, even though you spent your entire
Speaker 5: political lifetime believing that the economy and jobs are the
Speaker 5: same thing, and if you have lots of jobs, it's
Speaker 5: a good economy, and if you have a problem with jobs,
Speaker 5: it's a bad economy. Remember that prices is just as
Speaker 5: big a part of the economy, just hasn't come up
Speaker 5: much in the last forty years.
Speaker 2: I don't think most people found that as satisfying as
Speaker 2: Pete buddhaj Edge thought they would. Having him speak for
Speaker 2: the Democratic Party. What would you do different? One opened
Speaker 2: the schools as soon as possible. Yeah, yeah, so at
Speaker 2: the time, Pete, two do.
Speaker 1: Something about the border. Uh yeah, and three under America
Speaker 1: is screaming at you the whole time.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and three understand that inflation is a really big deal.
Speaker 1: That is stunning, it's freaking maddening.
Speaker 3: Well, he expects us, as you pointed out implied, he
Speaker 3: expects us to be grateful for his wisdom.
Speaker 1: And his saying, I deign to listen to your concerns.
Speaker 2: Now, yeah, you see, Europe knew that keeping the schools
Speaker 2: closed was a bad idea, and a lot of America.
Speaker 1: Yeah right, state's private schools. Yeah, we all knew.
Speaker 2: And this kind of fits in with the Biden thing
Speaker 2: a little bit. I mean, did you were you not
Speaker 2: listening to people? Do you not have friends? Orre you
Speaker 2: not looking at the polls? I mean, what the hell?
Speaker 2: How do you pretend that you didn't know that the
Speaker 2: vast majority of America didn't agree with you on some
Speaker 2: of these issues.
Speaker 1: And the just your sales but whatever, just figured out
Speaker 1: inflation's bad. Wow, Pete, you hero food Edge Edge.
Speaker 2: Okay, so we all know about the book, right, the book,
Speaker 2: the hilarious book in which Jake Tapper gets to make
Speaker 2: probably millions of dollars for his family by going around saying,
Speaker 2: I sit down for this please. I have uncovered a
Speaker 2: truth that is going to shock you. Joe Biden, blow
Speaker 2: your f and mind was not doing well mentally while
Speaker 2: he was president.
Speaker 6: Don't mess with them in a work unless you want to.
Speaker 1: Kevin benefits.
Speaker 2: It's so maddening, it's funny. But he continues to do
Speaker 2: interviews and there continued to be some interesting nuggets about it.
Speaker 2: And here he is with Alex Thompson, the co writer
Speaker 2: on the Stephen A. Smith Show podcast something or other.
Speaker 6: I will say, Stephen, and we never got somebody that
Speaker 6: said we should never have done this. I can't believe
Speaker 6: we did it. In retrospect. It was a mistake. How
Speaker 6: arrogant we were. I mean even you know, there was
Speaker 6: a top eight to top woite house aid who acknowledged
Speaker 6: to me that this short ten fifteen minute interview I
Speaker 6: did with Joe Biden in October twenty twenty two he
Speaker 6: would not have been capable of doing in October twenty
Speaker 6: twenty three. That admission was stunning to me, but it
Speaker 6: did not come with and we really made a mistake.
Speaker 1: We shouldn't have run him. What an error.
Speaker 6: I can't believe we did it. It didn't come with that.
Speaker 6: It came with you know. And but we thought that
Speaker 6: he was the only one that could be tromp blah
Speaker 6: blah blah. So I think that most were telling the
Speaker 6: truth as much as they had come to terms with
Speaker 6: it themselves.
Speaker 1: What But I do wonder where they will be.
Speaker 6: In a year, because you know, I heard from one
Speaker 6: of the people that one of the Democrats I interviewed
Speaker 6: for the book, who gave me one of the most
Speaker 6: shocking revelations. And I checked in and how are you doing?
Speaker 6: And you know, they're they're upset, but they're not upset
Speaker 6: at us. They're not upset at the book. They're just
Speaker 6: upset that it happened. And now everybody has. Everybody's talking
Speaker 6: about it.
Speaker 1: This is there were I think they're still working through
Speaker 1: a lot, don't you. Yes, this is so weird.
Speaker 2: It's so weird that Jake Tapper talks about this thing
Speaker 2: as if it's not him. He could have substituted they
Speaker 2: with I for all of those things he said. I
Speaker 2: have come to the full realization of what I was ignoring.
Speaker 2: I should have been more upset. I I mean, what
Speaker 2: are you time he's still working through this. I wonder
Speaker 2: where I will be in a year.
Speaker 1: What are you talking about, dude?
Speaker 3: Anyways, I may in a year from now arrive where
Speaker 3: America was three years ago. Wow, congratulations again, Oh thank
Speaker 3: you wise one.
Speaker 2: So I still honestly haven't figured out if he's just
Speaker 2: flat lying and grabbing money, or if he and all
Speaker 2: humanity is abble to delude themselves that much. If it, uh,
Speaker 2: if it fits necessary for your survival. I mean, I
Speaker 2: have ignored things in the past that it's shocking to
Speaker 2: me in retrospect, and maybe he was doing that too,
Speaker 2: But he still is. I can't believe he still is.
Speaker 2: I can buy maybe he was at the time. I
Speaker 2: can't believe you've written a book, you've done all these interviews,
Speaker 2: and you're still not sitting there saying I don't know
Speaker 2: how the hell I convinced myself that this guy was okay,
Speaker 2: him saying I was shocked to learn that he wouldn't
Speaker 2: have been able to do the same interview I had
Speaker 2: done with him a year.
Speaker 1: You were shocked to learn that, then you're crazy.
Speaker 3: Or dumb, blind, or self delusional because of ideology. We
Speaker 3: touched on Matt Tayebe's Fabulous takedown earlier.
Speaker 1: He refers to.
Speaker 3: An unnamed Democrat who denounced Biden's decision to run again
Speaker 3: as an abomination, but publicly defended Biden, and he mentions
Speaker 3: the top Democrat who called the White House and said,
Speaker 3: every day I'm defending this guy. Someone tells me it's okay,
Speaker 3: like it doesn't look great. Well, and Tybey says, if
Speaker 3: it doesn't look great, why are you defending him?
Speaker 1: The same person snitches out.
Speaker 3: Biden Aid's and Needa Dne, Jeff Science, and Mike Donald
Speaker 3: for not being straight about Biden's condition.
Speaker 1: But that person was doing the same thing to the public.
Speaker 3: Right and in a sense still is by staying anonymous. Yes,
Speaker 3: it's all And here's one more point than fire away.
Speaker 3: It's all good because they're talking to each other, not
Speaker 3: actual people or Republicans or other inconsequential in consequent inconsequential humans.
Speaker 3: As Megan Kelly and others noted, the book blows off
Speaker 3: the conservative media figures who are on Biden's problems from
Speaker 3: the jump and absolutely should take that emission as an insult. Still,
Speaker 3: it's more indicative of how this book sources think, or
Speaker 3: more where they think on a different plane somewhere above.
Speaker 2: Yeah, a lot of the uh Maya coulplas, the few
Speaker 2: kind of Maya couples that Jake Tapper is offered up
Speaker 2: aren't in the book. Their sense, the interview circuit started,
Speaker 2: and he's getting pressed hard on this.
Speaker 3: Stuff, and they're talking to each other one more sentence. Meanwhile,
Speaker 3: the authors never addressed the monstrous ethical and legal issues
Speaker 3: that should be at issue in a book whose apparent
Speaker 3: revelations are about Biden's incapacity being more extensive than known.
Speaker 3: Who was making decisions in that case, not just about
Speaker 3: who should run against Trump all these people seem to
Speaker 3: care about, but everything who was making the decisions.
Speaker 2: So the book mentions that they interviewed two hundred people
Speaker 2: about this, and Jake Tapper says, not one showed any remorse.
Speaker 2: We never got somebody that said we should have never
Speaker 2: done this. I can't believe we did it. In retrospect
Speaker 2: it was mistake. Not one out of two hundred said that.
Speaker 2: Of course, you're not saying it either, Jake. I look
Speaker 2: back with great humility. His press person wrote for him.
Speaker 2: You know, he says that over and over again. Yeah,
Speaker 2: but he doesn't say it's ridiculous that I wasn't pushing
Speaker 2: Democrats harder on this issue, given Biden's obvious mental state.
Speaker 1: He's hadn't said anything like that for whatever reason.
Speaker 2: Again, he's either dumb or lying or were able to
Speaker 2: delude ourselves much more than I realize. It's something I
Speaker 2: do not accept that I was part of a cover up.
Speaker 1: He's still he was just misled and didn't see it. God,
Speaker 1: that's crazy. It is crazy.
Speaker 3: Jake Tapper's Biden book is hilarious and insane. Tybe's headline
Speaker 3: is Jake Tapper and Alex Thompson's mass media Apologias leaps
Speaker 3: and bounds more demented than the book's subject, Joe Biden.
Speaker 2: I I agree, it's weird. I've used the word hilarious
Speaker 2: and weird a lot with that book.
Speaker 1: Yeah, you know, I'm sorry.
Speaker 3: I've got to the My favorite part of his description
Speaker 3: of the book was that.
Speaker 1: Where is it? Uh?
Speaker 3: He he thought it was like a mea culpa the book,
Speaker 3: that it would cover the press's failure to cover uh,
Speaker 3: the most obvious story in the history of the world.
Speaker 1: As he says, where oh, it's the opposite.
Speaker 3: Of a mea culpa and the literary degree of difficult
Speaker 3: cult he is awesome, equivalent to a blind unicyclist trying
Speaker 3: to juggle six chainsaws.
Speaker 1: Did Jake and Alex pull it off?
Speaker 3: They don't, but they sure leave a hell of a
Speaker 3: lot of blood on stage.
Speaker 2: So he thought he could write a book where he
Speaker 2: claims we were lied to by the Inner Circle?
Speaker 1: How were we supposed to know?
Speaker 3: Even though two thirds or more of America new Yeah,
Speaker 3: which zero sorts and a lot of us who are
Speaker 3: I flatter myself truth tellers who come at it from
Speaker 3: an unmistakably conservative point of view. But I mean it
Speaker 3: was beyond obvious to us. We were documenting it at
Speaker 3: the time.
Speaker 7: I mean, his unhinged performance in the twenty in the
Speaker 7: in the twenty twenty campaign before he was elected, You're
Speaker 7: a dog was losing it.
Speaker 1: What's that? You're a dog faced pony boy or whatever?
Speaker 1: He said that one exactly randomly. Yeah, yeh boy.
Speaker 3: It would be terrifying and so fascinating to be a
Speaker 3: tourist in somebody else's psyche just for five minutes. I mean,
Speaker 3: if you knew you could get back to your own
Speaker 3: it would be less terrifying. But if I could get
Speaker 3: inside Jake Tapper's head and actually feel his rationalization for
Speaker 3: why this book makes sense and some of the revelations
Speaker 3: are really interesting and compelling. I mean it's, as you
Speaker 3: put out, it's a decent read. Yeah, no, it definitely is.
Speaker 2: But it's like the bizarre moral posturing that's so tough
Speaker 2: to take. The particulars of like finding out Joe Biden's
Speaker 2: guy was so powerful, his interesting stuff.
Speaker 1: I'll read this. You've heard part of it before, but
Speaker 1: maybe not all of it. From the book.
Speaker 2: Five people were running the country and Joe Biden was
Speaker 2: at best a senior member of the board.
Speaker 1: That is huge. I mean that is absolute huge.
Speaker 2: The president of the United States was it best one
Speaker 2: of the five making decisions, said one person familiar with
Speaker 2: the internal dynamic. A cabinet secretary not just somebody in
Speaker 2: the White House and kind of new. A cabinet secretary
Speaker 2: expressed a similar sentiment about the group close to the president.
Speaker 2: I've never seen a situation like this before, with so
Speaker 2: few people having so much power, they would make huge
Speaker 2: economic decisions without calling the Treasury secretary yelling that's a scandal.
Speaker 2: That's a major scandal. We will finish, We will finish strong.
Speaker 3: Next the Great Andrew Styles and the Freebeacond just wrote
Speaker 3: a piece inside the Democratic Party's strategic efforts to enhance
Speaker 3: receptivity and masculine coded, heteronormative cohorts through a data driven,
Speaker 3: holistic outreach. Finally, in other words, trying to appeal to
Speaker 3: some dudes somewhere?
Speaker 2: Is that what that means? I lost track on the
Speaker 2: sixth word. I didn't know the definition.
Speaker 1: Of uh yeah, yeah.
Speaker 3: Democratic donors and consultants have been meeting in luxury hotels
Speaker 3: to analyze the party's inability to connect with mail voters
Speaker 3: and propose alternative communication strategies. The results coorting New York
Speaker 3: Times have often resembled anthropological studies of people from far
Speaker 3: away places.
Speaker 2: You know, that might be a good idea for a
Speaker 2: party as you are trying to come up with a
Speaker 2: strategy and messaging and all that sort of stuff. But
Speaker 2: what has happened, at least in recent cycles for president
Speaker 2: is somebody who intuitively knows all this stuff and how
Speaker 2: to do it, rises to the top and wins like
Speaker 2: a Trump or a Barack Obama. They just intuitively, instinctively
Speaker 2: understand how to talk to, you know, a giant group
Speaker 2: of people. They're not a think tank didn't tell them,
Speaker 2: Nobody wrote long, complicated papers based on a focus group.
Speaker 2: They just knew they had their finger on.
Speaker 3: The pulse of society right right well, and have the
Speaker 3: confidence to hang in there because like Ron DeSantis is
Speaker 3: really good and natural. As the governor of Florida, I
Speaker 3: see him all the time, But as a presidential candidate,
Speaker 3: he got talked into by the consultants, you know, a
Speaker 3: certain approach that wasn't him. He backed off in a
Speaker 3: way that like Obama or George W. Bush or one
Speaker 3: of those guys wouldn't.
Speaker 2: Joe used to say all the time, because we had
Speaker 2: this problem when we were doing before we got into
Speaker 2: talk radio, we were doing a variety of shows that
Speaker 2: weren't us, didn't match our personalities. We're trying to do
Speaker 2: shows for different kind of radio stations that weren't genuinely us.
Speaker 2: And Joe came up with this line of you never
Speaker 2: are faking it as good as you think you are,
Speaker 2: which I never thought we were faking that good anyway.
Speaker 1: It's just no, you don't imagine how badly we were
Speaker 1: actually faking it.
Speaker 2: But faking a smile, faking a certain sort of you know,
Speaker 2: act for a crowd doesn't work. Obama was himself everywhere.
Speaker 2: Trump was himself everywhere.
Speaker 1: George W. Bush was himself everywhere. Those people are just
Speaker 1: good at that.
Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, I found Obama's authentic self to be incredibly
Speaker 3: off putting. But I was in the minority that election,
Speaker 3: as it turns out. So getting back to Andrew styles
Speaker 3: with this stuff, and it's hilarious, it's parody. But speaking
Speaker 3: with American men, the strategic Blueprint for enhancing receptivity blah
Speaker 3: blah blah, basic conversation instead of Hi, there, what are
Speaker 3: your pronouns? Or have you read any good female novelists lately?
Speaker 3: Please try Hey, how are you nice to meet you?
Speaker 3: Where are you from? Over correction, do not try? Want
Speaker 3: to meet up later and do some roids? Or for
Speaker 3: sure I would totally let Joe Rogan bang my wife.
Speaker 1: No, that's trying too hard. You.
Speaker 8: I have some final thoughts, and some people say they
Speaker 8: are the greatest final thoughts they've ever heard. But if
Speaker 8: you look at what's happening, I would have to say
Speaker 8: armstrong and Getty have some wonderful final thoughts. They are
Speaker 8: right up there with Abraham Lincoln and everybody knows it.
Speaker 1: Here's your host, fake final starts Resident, thank you, sir Getty.
Speaker 3: Let's get a final thought from everybody on the crew
Speaker 3: to wrap things up for the day. There he is
Speaker 3: pressing the buttons in the control room or technical director
Speaker 3: Michael Angelow Michael final thought.
Speaker 6: Okay, I'm really curious now about other shows that you
Speaker 6: did that you say weren't weren't you?
Speaker 1: I mean, did you do like Spanish language or soft rock?
Speaker 2: Which would we'd have been I'd have been able to
Speaker 2: be more authentic on a Spanish language station than on
Speaker 2: a soft rock station.
Speaker 3: Right, Remember there are kids in the Vinnie Van and
Speaker 3: your ideal Uh, you got a tailor everything you say
Speaker 3: to your ideal listener.
Speaker 1: Your your core listener.
Speaker 3: Now, how about we just say what we want to
Speaker 3: say and people who like it will listen.
Speaker 1: Huh? How does that proposition strike it? Jack? Final thought? Well,
Speaker 1: just keeping on that theme for my final thought. When
Speaker 1: we were doing soft rock, the problem was our contempt for.
Speaker 2: Our listeners and that we would play some Celine Dion
Speaker 2: song and think we'd start the song and then take
Speaker 2: off our headphones and.
Speaker 1: Say, oh would get up in the morning and listen
Speaker 1: to this? What kind of person gets up in the
Speaker 1: morning and wants to hear this song?
Speaker 3: Getting back to Andrew Styles, I'll give him my final
Speaker 3: thought instead of saying, sorry to hear your daughter had
Speaker 3: her ribs broken by a courageous transgender athlete. But have
Speaker 3: you considered the possibility that her hospital stay would have
Speaker 3: been cheaper if we assassinated all healthcare executives. Instead of
Speaker 3: saying that, say Lebron James flops like a bitch?
Speaker 2: Who saw that televised sporting event last night? That was something,
Speaker 2: wasn't it. Armstrong and Getty wrapping up another grueling four
Speaker 2: hour workday.
Speaker 3: So many people, thanks so a little time. Go to
Speaker 3: armstrong giddy dot com. All the hot links oh so stimulating.
Speaker 3: Drop us a note mail bag at armstrong giddy dot com.
Speaker 3: Pick up some swag.
Speaker 2: I'm gonna watch nix Pacers the night. Speaking of that,
Speaker 2: see tomorrow. God bless America.
Speaker 1: I'm Strong and Getty. We're in fear territory right now.
Speaker 6: How do you mean the world been in the best
Speaker 6: healthcare and ruleee?
Speaker 1: Say what way? Sweetheart, sweetheart, listened to meet. They need
Speaker 1: to tone it down. Let me say, let me one thing.
Speaker 2: I'm Strong and Getty taking the magic out of things.
Speaker 2: You heard a headline that fills you with.
Speaker 3: Joy or awe, Here's why you're wrong. Stumping the magic
Speaker 3: out of life. The Armstrong and Getty Show.
Speaker 1: Thank you, Armstrong and Getty.