1 00:00:00,760 --> 00:00:03,680 Speaker 1: Hey, guys, Ready or not, twenty twenty four is here, 2 00:00:03,840 --> 00:00:06,320 Speaker 1: and we here at Breaking Points, are already thinking of 3 00:00:06,360 --> 00:00:08,600 Speaker 1: ways we can up our game for this critical election. 4 00:00:08,800 --> 00:00:11,719 Speaker 2: We rely on our premium subs to expand coverage, upgrade 5 00:00:11,720 --> 00:00:15,720 Speaker 2: the studio ad staff give you, guys, the best independent. 6 00:00:15,120 --> 00:00:16,239 Speaker 1: Coverage that is possible. 7 00:00:16,280 --> 00:00:18,239 Speaker 2: If you like what we're all about, it just means 8 00:00:18,320 --> 00:00:20,840 Speaker 2: the absolute world to have your support. But enough with that, 9 00:00:21,000 --> 00:00:23,680 Speaker 2: let's get to the show. 10 00:00:25,079 --> 00:00:27,200 Speaker 3: Good morning, and welcome to Counterpoints. We do have a 11 00:00:27,280 --> 00:00:30,400 Speaker 3: quick announcement. Ryan and I have two long days coming 12 00:00:30,480 --> 00:00:35,760 Speaker 3: up here actually because the debate special, the Breaking Points 13 00:00:35,760 --> 00:00:38,080 Speaker 3: Debate Special, where we're bringing together everyone in the Breaking 14 00:00:38,120 --> 00:00:42,040 Speaker 3: Points a cinematic universe, right, that's happening tomorrow night. We 15 00:00:42,040 --> 00:00:45,800 Speaker 3: can put this graphic up on the screen eight pm Eastern. 16 00:00:46,479 --> 00:00:48,800 Speaker 3: There's also a fun graphic where Ryan is trying to 17 00:00:48,840 --> 00:00:50,240 Speaker 3: figure out why he's so angry. 18 00:00:50,240 --> 00:00:51,880 Speaker 1: We can put that one up on the screen too. 19 00:00:53,000 --> 00:00:56,200 Speaker 1: And Emily looks like she wasn't ready for the picture. Yeah, 20 00:00:56,240 --> 00:00:58,959 Speaker 1: and she's like looking down at her phone and they're like, oh, oh, 21 00:00:59,000 --> 00:01:00,200 Speaker 1: we're doing this now. 22 00:01:00,760 --> 00:01:02,520 Speaker 3: You know that happened to me one time in the 23 00:01:02,560 --> 00:01:04,800 Speaker 3: outfield playing playing soft. 24 00:01:04,520 --> 00:01:05,800 Speaker 1: And the ball like landed on your head. 25 00:01:06,200 --> 00:01:08,760 Speaker 3: Well I had to go like put my glove up 26 00:01:08,760 --> 00:01:11,880 Speaker 3: and my phone fell out. My coach wasn't happy about that. 27 00:01:12,200 --> 00:01:15,040 Speaker 3: At eight pm. But tonight we will also be moderating 28 00:01:15,080 --> 00:01:17,480 Speaker 3: a debate for zero Hedge on the Border. That's going 29 00:01:17,520 --> 00:01:18,479 Speaker 3: to be at seven pm. 30 00:01:18,640 --> 00:01:20,200 Speaker 1: Is that live or that post later? 31 00:01:20,319 --> 00:01:23,160 Speaker 3: I think it's live. Okay, all right, so seven pm tonight, 32 00:01:23,200 --> 00:01:23,839 Speaker 3: but put. 33 00:01:23,720 --> 00:01:25,640 Speaker 1: Some details about that somewhere. 34 00:01:25,400 --> 00:01:28,800 Speaker 3: Whole Breaking Points universe Tomorrow eight pm for the presidential debate, 35 00:01:28,840 --> 00:01:30,720 Speaker 3: which is totally a first in history. We're going to 36 00:01:30,720 --> 00:01:31,120 Speaker 3: talk about it. 37 00:01:31,240 --> 00:01:32,960 Speaker 1: Robbie's going to be in that debate, right, getting the 38 00:01:33,000 --> 00:01:36,680 Speaker 1: Rising crew back together. Yeah, Open borders, Robbie, yeah yeah, 39 00:01:37,000 --> 00:01:39,160 Speaker 1: and me and me and Robbie up. 40 00:01:40,040 --> 00:01:41,440 Speaker 3: We'll have nachos on the table. 41 00:01:41,520 --> 00:01:43,200 Speaker 1: Excellent forward to that. 42 00:01:43,360 --> 00:01:47,400 Speaker 3: Okay, So we now that we have the programming notes 43 00:01:47,440 --> 00:01:49,200 Speaker 3: out of the way, we are going to start by 44 00:01:49,240 --> 00:01:51,640 Speaker 3: talking about the debate today. We're then going to go 45 00:01:51,680 --> 00:01:55,720 Speaker 3: over the election results, super super buzzy stuff. Obviously, Ryan 46 00:01:55,840 --> 00:01:57,640 Speaker 3: quite literally wrote the book on the Squad, and the 47 00:01:57,680 --> 00:02:00,200 Speaker 3: Squad is front and center as we have results coming 48 00:02:00,240 --> 00:02:02,760 Speaker 3: in from primary elections all over the country last night. 49 00:02:03,000 --> 00:02:06,120 Speaker 3: We're going to talk about a terrible split screen playing 50 00:02:06,120 --> 00:02:10,399 Speaker 3: out in Kenya, where four hundred Kenyans arrived in Port 51 00:02:10,400 --> 00:02:15,120 Speaker 3: of Prince yesterday in Haiti. And also there's at least 52 00:02:15,120 --> 00:02:18,000 Speaker 3: twenty two deaths so far in protests over a. 53 00:02:17,960 --> 00:02:21,440 Speaker 1: New tax bill. Yeah, back in Nairobi, all hell is 54 00:02:21,480 --> 00:02:25,120 Speaker 1: breaking loose, while ye Kenya is sending on behalf of 55 00:02:25,160 --> 00:02:28,720 Speaker 1: the United States an international invasion force into Haiti. So 56 00:02:28,760 --> 00:02:31,320 Speaker 1: we'll break some of that down. I'm going to talk 57 00:02:31,360 --> 00:02:34,840 Speaker 1: about the disclosures from the Portland, Oregon race that we 58 00:02:34,880 --> 00:02:38,880 Speaker 1: covered about a month ago, where a pack as we 59 00:02:38,919 --> 00:02:41,919 Speaker 1: reported at the time, was spending millions of dollars secretly 60 00:02:42,000 --> 00:02:45,359 Speaker 1: to influence that race. They were finally a month after 61 00:02:45,400 --> 00:02:48,040 Speaker 1: the election, forced to disclose their actual funding and despite 62 00:02:48,040 --> 00:02:51,000 Speaker 1: their denials, you're going to be shocked it actually was. 63 00:02:51,080 --> 00:02:54,320 Speaker 1: Apak going to unpack how all of that unfolded. And 64 00:02:54,360 --> 00:02:55,840 Speaker 1: then at the end of the show, we're going to 65 00:02:55,840 --> 00:02:59,320 Speaker 1: be talking to a Theodore Postal, who's one of the 66 00:03:00,240 --> 00:03:04,120 Speaker 1: kind of nuclear war experts in the world and in 67 00:03:04,160 --> 00:03:07,320 Speaker 1: world history, since we only have since the forties, Yeah, 68 00:03:07,400 --> 00:03:10,080 Speaker 1: to think about nuclear war. He's gone back and forth 69 00:03:10,080 --> 00:03:12,280 Speaker 1: from the Pentagon to mit A is one of the 70 00:03:12,320 --> 00:03:15,360 Speaker 1: most respected voices on this He is warning that the 71 00:03:15,440 --> 00:03:21,000 Speaker 1: Ukrainian strikes inside Russia are putting nuclear war at a 72 00:03:21,200 --> 00:03:26,200 Speaker 1: much higher risk than it was before Ukraine started striking 73 00:03:26,800 --> 00:03:31,160 Speaker 1: Russia's early warning nuclear detection system. It's pretty frightening and 74 00:03:31,680 --> 00:03:34,240 Speaker 1: kind of should be leading the news all around the world. Yeah, 75 00:03:34,280 --> 00:03:36,200 Speaker 1: you'd think, kind of like a first order thing that 76 00:03:36,280 --> 00:03:38,320 Speaker 1: I think we all want is to not die in 77 00:03:38,320 --> 00:03:41,880 Speaker 1: a nuclear annihilation, and yet here we are. We'll put 78 00:03:41,880 --> 00:03:42,760 Speaker 1: it at the end of the show. 79 00:03:42,560 --> 00:03:44,640 Speaker 3: Though only one's talking about it at the end of 80 00:03:44,680 --> 00:03:47,920 Speaker 3: the show. Well, let's start with the big news, which 81 00:03:48,000 --> 00:03:50,760 Speaker 3: is that historic debait is still as of right now 82 00:03:50,800 --> 00:03:52,800 Speaker 3: set for tomorrow. I continue to be a synic about 83 00:03:52,800 --> 00:03:55,160 Speaker 3: whether it will actually happen. It seems pretty likely that 84 00:03:55,200 --> 00:03:58,200 Speaker 3: it will actually happen at this point. But Hillary Clinton 85 00:03:58,240 --> 00:04:00,920 Speaker 3: is weighing in. Let's put a one up on the screen. 86 00:04:01,040 --> 00:04:03,800 Speaker 3: Hillary Clinton wrote in otbed for the New York Times, 87 00:04:04,360 --> 00:04:06,960 Speaker 3: where as the Fox News headline put it, she complained, 88 00:04:07,000 --> 00:04:10,560 Speaker 3: it's quote impossible to defeat Trump and a quote waste 89 00:04:10,560 --> 00:04:13,320 Speaker 3: of time to refute his arguments. Ran the thing I 90 00:04:13,480 --> 00:04:15,840 Speaker 3: pulled out of this op ed from Hillary Clinton is 91 00:04:15,840 --> 00:04:19,120 Speaker 3: a quote where she says, Unfortunately, mister Biden starts from 92 00:04:19,120 --> 00:04:21,560 Speaker 3: a disadvantage because there's no way he can spend as 93 00:04:21,640 --> 00:04:24,479 Speaker 3: much time preparing as I did eight years ago. Being 94 00:04:24,560 --> 00:04:27,479 Speaker 3: president isn't just a day job. It's an everything, everywhere, 95 00:04:27,520 --> 00:04:30,280 Speaker 3: all at once job. Historically that has led to weaker 96 00:04:30,320 --> 00:04:34,560 Speaker 3: first debate performances for the incumbent. So I feel like 97 00:04:34,600 --> 00:04:37,840 Speaker 3: this op ed, which she dropped a day before dropping 98 00:04:37,839 --> 00:04:40,400 Speaker 3: her big book announcement, was kind of a nice one 99 00:04:40,480 --> 00:04:44,120 Speaker 3: to pr punch for Hillary Clinton. Savvy as ever, but 100 00:04:45,160 --> 00:04:48,599 Speaker 3: I think she's trying to lay the groundwork for a 101 00:04:49,000 --> 00:04:52,760 Speaker 3: mediocre Biden performance by pushing publishing a opbed in the 102 00:04:52,800 --> 00:04:55,279 Speaker 3: pages of the New York Times saying it's an impossible job. 103 00:04:56,279 --> 00:04:58,080 Speaker 1: That's always what I say after I lose a debate, 104 00:04:58,120 --> 00:05:00,480 Speaker 1: and it's that it's just an impossible task. It's a 105 00:05:00,520 --> 00:05:04,080 Speaker 1: waste of time, yes, But on the other hand, it 106 00:05:04,160 --> 00:05:06,320 Speaker 1: is kind of an impossible task to debate Donald Trump. 107 00:05:06,400 --> 00:05:10,360 Speaker 1: Can you imagine? Then Hillary has actually done it, and 108 00:05:10,400 --> 00:05:13,159 Speaker 1: she had Philippe Brains as the guy trying to pretend 109 00:05:13,200 --> 00:05:16,000 Speaker 1: to be Trump, and but nobody can actually be Trump. 110 00:05:16,080 --> 00:05:19,520 Speaker 1: He is one of a kind in basically world history. 111 00:05:20,120 --> 00:05:22,800 Speaker 1: So you get out there and you have no idea 112 00:05:23,480 --> 00:05:25,880 Speaker 1: what on earth is going to come out of that 113 00:05:25,920 --> 00:05:28,560 Speaker 1: guy's mouth. You just don't know, and you don't even 114 00:05:28,560 --> 00:05:30,960 Speaker 1: know if it's going to work because nobody's ever said 115 00:05:31,000 --> 00:05:33,280 Speaker 1: it before, nobody's ever tried it before. So it's not 116 00:05:33,320 --> 00:05:35,440 Speaker 1: something you can even and train for. And it's not 117 00:05:35,480 --> 00:05:38,479 Speaker 1: as if either Biden or Trump are going to be 118 00:05:38,480 --> 00:05:41,880 Speaker 1: getting into like the nitty gritty of tariff policy or know, 119 00:05:42,200 --> 00:05:45,359 Speaker 1: one of these like nineteen eighties or nineties debates that 120 00:05:45,480 --> 00:05:49,080 Speaker 1: gets like super wonky, like that's just like nobody expects 121 00:05:49,120 --> 00:05:52,840 Speaker 1: anybody to go remotely near that. If these candidates can 122 00:05:52,839 --> 00:05:56,400 Speaker 1: string together a sentence from beginning to end, that that 123 00:05:56,480 --> 00:05:59,440 Speaker 1: is like grammatical yes. And if they can even put 124 00:05:59,480 --> 00:06:04,000 Speaker 1: together a paragraph that can be transcribed and you read 125 00:06:04,040 --> 00:06:06,200 Speaker 1: it and you're like, yeah, that's like eighth grade level 126 00:06:06,320 --> 00:06:08,719 Speaker 1: and it makes a clear point, that would be a 127 00:06:08,760 --> 00:06:11,080 Speaker 1: win for either of them. But I don't expect either 128 00:06:11,120 --> 00:06:14,360 Speaker 1: of those things to happen. What we are expecting, though, 129 00:06:14,480 --> 00:06:18,279 Speaker 1: are some stunts. And Hillary Clinton remembers that right after 130 00:06:18,320 --> 00:06:23,200 Speaker 1: the Access Hollywood moment, Donald Trump responded using what was 131 00:06:23,240 --> 00:06:27,880 Speaker 1: the Steve Bannon's idea of bringing three or four women 132 00:06:27,960 --> 00:06:31,480 Speaker 1: who had accused her husband of sexual assault to the. 133 00:06:31,480 --> 00:06:34,400 Speaker 3: Debate at them like in the front row. 134 00:06:34,839 --> 00:06:37,040 Speaker 1: And had a press conference with them before an absolutely 135 00:06:37,040 --> 00:06:40,440 Speaker 1: extraordinary moment. And so now people are speculating based on 136 00:06:40,520 --> 00:06:42,800 Speaker 1: some leaks and hints from the Trump campaign. We can 137 00:06:42,800 --> 00:06:46,760 Speaker 1: put this next element up here of who Trump is 138 00:06:46,800 --> 00:06:49,599 Speaker 1: going to bring this time, like what kind of event 139 00:06:49,800 --> 00:06:52,360 Speaker 1: he's going to try to create, And one thing they're 140 00:06:52,360 --> 00:06:55,400 Speaker 1: suggesting is that he might bring family members of people 141 00:06:55,520 --> 00:07:00,719 Speaker 1: killed by immigrants here in the United States. Do you 142 00:07:00,760 --> 00:07:03,920 Speaker 1: have any insight from the Trump camp as to what 143 00:07:04,200 --> 00:07:07,359 Speaker 1: kind of kind of a show they're planning on putting on. 144 00:07:07,800 --> 00:07:09,920 Speaker 3: Well, there was an interesting report. This is actually just 145 00:07:09,960 --> 00:07:13,240 Speaker 3: the next element from Byron Yorke over at the Washington Examiner. 146 00:07:13,360 --> 00:07:14,960 Speaker 3: This is a three. We can put it up on 147 00:07:15,000 --> 00:07:17,600 Speaker 3: the screen and I'm going to read from it. Trump 148 00:07:17,680 --> 00:07:20,400 Speaker 3: told the Examiner what they did, I'm pretty sure is 149 00:07:20,400 --> 00:07:22,400 Speaker 3: that they approached me with a debate that I couldn't 150 00:07:22,400 --> 00:07:27,080 Speaker 3: take Dana Bash, Jake Tapper, and then Byron put in brackets. 151 00:07:27,080 --> 00:07:29,640 Speaker 3: Trump referred to the CNN anchor commentator as fake Tapper 152 00:07:29,680 --> 00:07:33,560 Speaker 3: throughout no audience, sitting down, originally sitting down a dead debate, 153 00:07:33,600 --> 00:07:35,240 Speaker 3: turn off the mics when you're not speaking so I 154 00:07:35,280 --> 00:07:37,800 Speaker 3: can't interrupt him. They knew I wouldn't accept that because 155 00:07:37,800 --> 00:07:40,280 Speaker 3: it was CNN, Dana Bash, Jake Tapper, and I like 156 00:07:40,320 --> 00:07:43,320 Speaker 3: an audience, and probably he doesn't, who knows, so they 157 00:07:43,320 --> 00:07:45,280 Speaker 3: thought they would present it. I would say no, and 158 00:07:45,320 --> 00:07:47,400 Speaker 3: they would say we can't debate because Trump said no, 159 00:07:47,760 --> 00:07:50,320 Speaker 3: So I said yes before they even gave me the terms. 160 00:07:50,640 --> 00:07:55,720 Speaker 3: So he got roped into it. Interestingly, that's Trump explaining 161 00:07:55,920 --> 00:07:58,440 Speaker 3: how he even got Biden to agree to a debate. 162 00:07:58,640 --> 00:08:01,440 Speaker 3: And one of the things, in terms of the stunt question, 163 00:08:02,360 --> 00:08:05,360 Speaker 3: this is the reason I described this debate as historic. Obviously, 164 00:08:05,400 --> 00:08:08,360 Speaker 3: debates happen all the time, but some people may be 165 00:08:08,440 --> 00:08:10,400 Speaker 3: aware this is the first debate and modern history that's 166 00:08:10,440 --> 00:08:13,040 Speaker 3: happening without the Presidential Debate Commission. Is that what it's 167 00:08:13,040 --> 00:08:13,960 Speaker 3: called debate committee? 168 00:08:13,960 --> 00:08:15,840 Speaker 1: Debate on Well, it's the first one since the commission 169 00:08:15,920 --> 00:08:18,440 Speaker 1: was created in like the seventies, right, right, And it's 170 00:08:18,480 --> 00:08:19,520 Speaker 1: the earliest ever. 171 00:08:19,560 --> 00:08:23,880 Speaker 3: Earliest ever first since the Debate Commission was created in 172 00:08:23,920 --> 00:08:27,440 Speaker 3: the nineteen seventies, meaning that sounds maybe like a small thing, 173 00:08:27,520 --> 00:08:29,920 Speaker 3: but what it means is that it's totally uncharted territory 174 00:08:30,000 --> 00:08:33,920 Speaker 3: for CNN, it's totally uncharted territory for the campaigns, and 175 00:08:34,040 --> 00:08:38,240 Speaker 3: so much negotiating actually goes into this. I mean, it's 176 00:08:38,320 --> 00:08:41,000 Speaker 3: just you saw what Crystal and Sager reported yesterday about 177 00:08:41,200 --> 00:08:43,560 Speaker 3: breaking points not being able to pick up on the 178 00:08:43,600 --> 00:08:47,200 Speaker 3: stream of the debate. I mean, it's the stupidest little 179 00:08:47,240 --> 00:08:49,360 Speaker 3: piece of negotiating, leverage whatever that. 180 00:08:49,400 --> 00:08:52,400 Speaker 1: I would think that a debate would be public for 181 00:08:52,760 --> 00:08:54,440 Speaker 1: everybody to stream or whatever. 182 00:08:54,520 --> 00:08:56,640 Speaker 3: But yeah, you would absolutely think that it would be. 183 00:08:56,679 --> 00:08:59,680 Speaker 3: But this is uncharted territory. And so I think that 184 00:09:00,080 --> 00:09:01,560 Speaker 3: Trump is going to be reacting just in the next 185 00:09:01,600 --> 00:09:05,520 Speaker 3: twenty four to forty eight hours, and we don't really know, 186 00:09:05,679 --> 00:09:07,680 Speaker 3: and I think he doesn't really know, which is why 187 00:09:07,720 --> 00:09:10,840 Speaker 3: he is also doing something similar. Hillary Clinton doesn't run 188 00:09:10,880 --> 00:09:12,319 Speaker 3: it out out in the New York Times without the 189 00:09:12,360 --> 00:09:15,240 Speaker 3: Biden campaign knowing what's going to come. And that's why 190 00:09:15,280 --> 00:09:17,520 Speaker 3: I think Trump talking to Byron New York and being like, 191 00:09:18,120 --> 00:09:20,480 Speaker 3: why did I agree to fake Tapper? Well, you know, 192 00:09:20,520 --> 00:09:22,200 Speaker 3: it was the only way to get Biden to debate. 193 00:09:23,000 --> 00:09:24,800 Speaker 3: I think he's also trying to lay the groundwork for 194 00:09:24,880 --> 00:09:28,560 Speaker 3: mediocre performance, because frankly, they both performed, like I'm trying 195 00:09:28,559 --> 00:09:32,640 Speaker 3: to use mediocre as an adverb mediocrely back in twenty twenty. 196 00:09:33,600 --> 00:09:36,560 Speaker 1: And there's a funny moment in that interview, kind of 197 00:09:36,600 --> 00:09:39,480 Speaker 1: after that exchange where the interviewer says, Okay, yeah, but 198 00:09:39,520 --> 00:09:41,920 Speaker 1: you couldn't actually say no to a debate, could you? 199 00:09:42,559 --> 00:09:45,199 Speaker 1: And he says, and this is what people love about Trump, 200 00:09:45,240 --> 00:09:47,720 Speaker 1: He's like, yeah, you're right, No, I couldn't. There's just 201 00:09:47,760 --> 00:09:49,280 Speaker 1: no way I could do that. Well, and then he 202 00:09:49,800 --> 00:09:53,080 Speaker 1: and everybody knows that, every politician knows that, but he's 203 00:09:53,600 --> 00:09:55,360 Speaker 1: unique in that he'll just say it, yeah, I couldn't 204 00:09:55,360 --> 00:09:55,720 Speaker 1: have said no. 205 00:09:56,040 --> 00:09:58,920 Speaker 3: Right, And he also said something really interesting recently reflecting 206 00:09:58,920 --> 00:10:01,560 Speaker 3: on He's like, some people told me that maybe the 207 00:10:01,600 --> 00:10:04,600 Speaker 3: reason I won was because of the debates. And that's why. 208 00:10:04,760 --> 00:10:07,200 Speaker 3: I mean, again, they're doing this in late June, but 209 00:10:07,240 --> 00:10:09,760 Speaker 3: that's why the debates are important. Because I think Trump 210 00:10:09,800 --> 00:10:12,400 Speaker 3: is correct that one of the biggest reasons he won 211 00:10:13,040 --> 00:10:15,400 Speaker 3: the primary and then won the election of twenty sixteen 212 00:10:15,520 --> 00:10:17,960 Speaker 3: is because people did not expect him to handle Hillary 213 00:10:18,000 --> 00:10:19,600 Speaker 3: Clinton the way that he did, and obviously the other 214 00:10:19,679 --> 00:10:24,320 Speaker 3: GOP candidates, and Clinton didn't perform well druxtaposed with Donald Trump, 215 00:10:24,320 --> 00:10:26,720 Speaker 3: not as well as people expected her to. I agree 216 00:10:26,760 --> 00:10:29,040 Speaker 3: with her and with you that it's an impossible job 217 00:10:29,160 --> 00:10:32,680 Speaker 3: because he's what was he called yesterday by RFK Junior, 218 00:10:32,720 --> 00:10:35,600 Speaker 3: the best debater of his generation or in a generation, 219 00:10:35,720 --> 00:10:36,760 Speaker 3: or in American history. 220 00:10:36,800 --> 00:10:39,520 Speaker 1: It's just that he's in a different league. And I 221 00:10:39,559 --> 00:10:42,480 Speaker 1: don't mean that necessarily as a compliment, right, He's just different. 222 00:10:43,200 --> 00:10:45,640 Speaker 3: It's like he's so special. 223 00:10:45,520 --> 00:10:48,920 Speaker 1: The way like if you grew up like being some 224 00:10:48,960 --> 00:10:52,480 Speaker 1: Oxford debater like Hillary Clinton, and now all of a sudden, 225 00:10:53,280 --> 00:10:58,079 Speaker 1: the guys just saying wrong and like sayings to lock 226 00:10:58,160 --> 00:10:58,520 Speaker 1: you up. 227 00:10:58,600 --> 00:11:02,360 Speaker 3: It's like you bring women that your husband is accused 228 00:11:02,400 --> 00:11:04,240 Speaker 3: of actually Sultan putting in the front round. 229 00:11:04,480 --> 00:11:07,240 Speaker 1: How do you respond to that? And with with Biden, 230 00:11:07,600 --> 00:11:12,280 Speaker 1: Let's not forget one of what Donald Trump did to 231 00:11:12,440 --> 00:11:15,920 Speaker 1: Biden in twenty twenty. He showed up to the debate 232 00:11:16,800 --> 00:11:21,360 Speaker 1: knowing he had COVID remember this, and yeah, and then 233 00:11:21,400 --> 00:11:24,520 Speaker 1: he skipped the COVID test Like he's calling for a 234 00:11:24,600 --> 00:11:27,480 Speaker 1: drug test this time, saying because he's accusing Biden of 235 00:11:27,520 --> 00:11:30,520 Speaker 1: being on performance enhancing drugs, as if Trump hasn't been 236 00:11:30,600 --> 00:11:33,000 Speaker 1: you know, jacked up on you know, meth and pseuda 237 00:11:33,040 --> 00:11:37,559 Speaker 1: fed his entire life. Uh, suda fed, Like. 238 00:11:37,120 --> 00:11:39,320 Speaker 3: Like we think he's a pseudo fedatict. 239 00:11:39,640 --> 00:11:44,440 Speaker 1: Yeah, he's he's on sometimes some type of uppers the Okay, 240 00:11:44,840 --> 00:11:46,680 Speaker 1: you're distracting me from my very good point that I 241 00:11:46,720 --> 00:11:50,080 Speaker 1: was making. But Ronnie Jackson, a congressman, jumped into the 242 00:11:50,120 --> 00:11:54,720 Speaker 1: fray and said that, you know, Biden ought to have 243 00:11:54,760 --> 00:11:57,800 Speaker 1: be drug tests ahead of this spate. Ronnie Jackson was 244 00:11:57,840 --> 00:12:00,880 Speaker 1: Trump's corrupt doctor who was pumping him full of all 245 00:12:00,920 --> 00:12:03,280 Speaker 1: sorts of who knows what the entire why the White 246 00:12:03,320 --> 00:12:06,760 Speaker 1: House doctor, Yeah, and prescribing it like off label to 247 00:12:06,800 --> 00:12:07,840 Speaker 1: all the White House staff. 248 00:12:07,920 --> 00:12:08,120 Speaker 4: Yeah. 249 00:12:08,160 --> 00:12:09,600 Speaker 1: And then Ronnie Jackson is going to come in and 250 00:12:09,600 --> 00:12:12,280 Speaker 1: talk about performance enhancing drugs? Are you kidding me? This 251 00:12:12,320 --> 00:12:14,360 Speaker 1: is a good button whatever, A wonderful point I was 252 00:12:14,360 --> 00:12:14,959 Speaker 1: planning to make. 253 00:12:15,280 --> 00:12:18,240 Speaker 3: So, but this is actually relevant because I think to 254 00:12:18,800 --> 00:12:21,120 Speaker 3: Ronnie Jackson come out and saying that Trumps saying that, 255 00:12:21,160 --> 00:12:23,040 Speaker 3: This is why I still think it's possible the debate 256 00:12:23,040 --> 00:12:24,880 Speaker 3: gets called off in the next twenty four to forty 257 00:12:24,880 --> 00:12:26,040 Speaker 3: eight hours because again. 258 00:12:26,080 --> 00:12:27,280 Speaker 1: They can't fill their prescriptions. 259 00:12:27,360 --> 00:12:31,880 Speaker 3: They can't fill their prescriptions. Also, because the incentive for 260 00:12:31,960 --> 00:12:33,839 Speaker 3: both of them to back out and make a big 261 00:12:33,880 --> 00:12:36,280 Speaker 3: deal of it shifts, as you know, if he can 262 00:12:36,320 --> 00:12:38,840 Speaker 3: make a political point about Biden not agreed to do 263 00:12:38,880 --> 00:12:41,640 Speaker 3: a drug test. As stupid as that sounds, Biden could 264 00:12:41,679 --> 00:12:44,479 Speaker 3: never agree to do a drug test. Everybody knows Biden. 265 00:12:44,280 --> 00:12:46,920 Speaker 1: But the whole thing that's absurd, Like, of. 266 00:12:46,800 --> 00:12:49,800 Speaker 3: Course it is. But but from the political. 267 00:12:49,520 --> 00:12:51,800 Speaker 1: He's serious though, I don't think he's serious, because then 268 00:12:51,840 --> 00:12:53,520 Speaker 1: Trump would have to take a drug test. 269 00:12:53,679 --> 00:12:55,600 Speaker 3: I think it. I mean, I think it's. 270 00:12:55,679 --> 00:12:58,319 Speaker 1: Trump after seven pm is like, come on. 271 00:12:58,480 --> 00:13:01,640 Speaker 3: But Trump also just said that he called, basically called 272 00:13:01,640 --> 00:13:03,760 Speaker 3: CNN's bluff. I think he would be willing to call 273 00:13:03,760 --> 00:13:06,120 Speaker 3: Biden's bluff if the incentive shifts so as much that 274 00:13:06,360 --> 00:13:08,760 Speaker 3: you know, Biden refusing to take a drug test. So 275 00:13:08,880 --> 00:13:11,079 Speaker 3: they're not debating because Biden won't take a drug test. 276 00:13:11,080 --> 00:13:12,520 Speaker 3: If Donald Trump wants to roll with. 277 00:13:12,400 --> 00:13:14,600 Speaker 1: That, Trump's going to pain a cup before this debate. 278 00:13:15,160 --> 00:13:18,240 Speaker 3: Yeah, no, no, but I think he knows that. And 279 00:13:18,640 --> 00:13:20,679 Speaker 3: again I'm not saying that's what's going to happen. I'm 280 00:13:20,679 --> 00:13:22,800 Speaker 3: saying there are a million different variables up in the 281 00:13:22,840 --> 00:13:24,800 Speaker 3: air right now, because all they agreed to do this 282 00:13:25,000 --> 00:13:27,800 Speaker 3: with was a network and each other. A network and 283 00:13:27,840 --> 00:13:29,760 Speaker 3: each other. It is not the same. 284 00:13:30,080 --> 00:13:33,199 Speaker 1: And we're only sure moderators have to take a performance 285 00:13:33,280 --> 00:13:34,120 Speaker 1: enhancing drug test. 286 00:13:34,240 --> 00:13:40,240 Speaker 3: I'm all for it for it, maybe we should, but 287 00:13:40,520 --> 00:13:43,920 Speaker 3: the thing is, if you're not on drugs, then you're 288 00:13:43,960 --> 00:13:47,840 Speaker 3: just qualified. So anyway, I continue to think that this 289 00:13:47,880 --> 00:13:50,000 Speaker 3: is a very tenuous situation because of the way the 290 00:13:50,000 --> 00:13:51,559 Speaker 3: debate is set up. I think it's going to be 291 00:13:51,600 --> 00:13:54,720 Speaker 3: a mess if it happens for CNN because of that 292 00:13:54,840 --> 00:13:58,000 Speaker 3: exact reason. They're doing commercial breaks. So someone's campaign comes 293 00:13:58,040 --> 00:14:00,400 Speaker 3: into commercial breaks and says, you're cutting the mics too much. 294 00:14:00,960 --> 00:14:02,880 Speaker 3: They're going to be cutting the mics. Trump is going 295 00:14:02,920 --> 00:14:05,120 Speaker 3: to be yelling. It's just a mess. 296 00:14:05,480 --> 00:14:09,880 Speaker 1: So I would recommend actually for Biden microdosing shrooms because 297 00:14:09,880 --> 00:14:12,560 Speaker 1: I don't think that would show up in a test. Now, 298 00:14:12,559 --> 00:14:15,199 Speaker 1: you got to be careful, like you know, you have 299 00:14:15,280 --> 00:14:16,280 Speaker 1: a little too heavy on that. 300 00:14:16,720 --> 00:14:17,320 Speaker 3: Jennet Yellen. 301 00:14:17,360 --> 00:14:21,360 Speaker 1: It's going to be an interesting debate, yeah, but yeah, 302 00:14:21,520 --> 00:14:22,320 Speaker 1: it's worth of shot. 303 00:14:22,400 --> 00:14:24,880 Speaker 3: Maybe Janet Yellen can actually give them some shrooms. She 304 00:14:24,920 --> 00:14:26,800 Speaker 3: can administer the doses clinically. 305 00:14:26,920 --> 00:14:29,800 Speaker 1: Does Janet Yellen have a background in South Cybin. 306 00:14:29,720 --> 00:14:30,800 Speaker 3: Remember in China? 307 00:14:31,000 --> 00:14:34,800 Speaker 1: She Oh, that's right, that's right, that's right. She accidentally 308 00:14:35,360 --> 00:14:37,600 Speaker 1: dosed herself. Forgot about that. That's amazing. 309 00:14:38,120 --> 00:14:42,560 Speaker 3: Again, people think Joe Biden like there's there's not not unseious. 310 00:14:42,560 --> 00:14:45,680 Speaker 3: People saying that Biden did this to agreed to do 311 00:14:45,720 --> 00:14:48,040 Speaker 3: this earlier, that Democrats agreed to have Biden debating early 312 00:14:48,120 --> 00:14:50,120 Speaker 3: so that they could have a contingency plan in place 313 00:14:50,160 --> 00:14:52,240 Speaker 3: for the convention in August. I don't know if there's 314 00:14:52,240 --> 00:14:54,080 Speaker 3: truth to that, but a lot on the line of Mark. 315 00:14:54,280 --> 00:14:57,320 Speaker 1: What I've heard from the Biden camp is that they 316 00:14:57,520 --> 00:15:00,080 Speaker 1: they do recognize that they're losing to Trump and and 317 00:15:00,400 --> 00:15:03,000 Speaker 1: felt like they needed some way to shake the race up, 318 00:15:03,000 --> 00:15:05,480 Speaker 1: and that this so therefore they needed an early debate. 319 00:15:05,880 --> 00:15:10,200 Speaker 1: At the same time, they're very unconfident about how he's 320 00:15:10,240 --> 00:15:13,200 Speaker 1: going to perform in the debate, and the thinking is, Okay, well, 321 00:15:13,240 --> 00:15:15,080 Speaker 1: this is worth a shot, and if it works, great, 322 00:15:15,440 --> 00:15:17,680 Speaker 1: but if it doesn't, it's far enough away from the 323 00:15:17,680 --> 00:15:21,360 Speaker 1: general election that people will have forgotten this debate performance. 324 00:15:21,840 --> 00:15:25,480 Speaker 1: Those two things, if you've figured it out, are contradictory 325 00:15:26,040 --> 00:15:29,920 Speaker 1: like you can't, on the one hand, hope that a 326 00:15:29,960 --> 00:15:33,360 Speaker 1: good debate performance is going to catapult you to the 327 00:15:33,400 --> 00:15:36,720 Speaker 1: White House, but believe that a bad debate performance isn't 328 00:15:36,800 --> 00:15:40,560 Speaker 1: actually going to hurt you, because those are ideas or 329 00:15:40,600 --> 00:15:43,520 Speaker 1: in contradiction. Either the debate matters or it doesn't. But 330 00:15:43,840 --> 00:15:46,920 Speaker 1: you know, contradictions have never stopped anybody from moving forward 331 00:15:46,920 --> 00:15:48,560 Speaker 1: with what they wanted to do. 332 00:15:48,520 --> 00:15:52,840 Speaker 3: Anyway, although they can also both be so weak that 333 00:15:52,880 --> 00:15:56,040 Speaker 3: it just neutralizes each other's weaknesses, which I think actually 334 00:15:56,040 --> 00:15:57,160 Speaker 3: is what happened in twenty twenty. 335 00:15:57,360 --> 00:16:01,400 Speaker 1: Yeah, and the other thinking among Democrats is that people 336 00:16:01,440 --> 00:16:05,120 Speaker 1: don't like Donald Trump in general, and so the more 337 00:16:05,160 --> 00:16:08,680 Speaker 1: you can get Donald Trump in front of the American public, 338 00:16:09,080 --> 00:16:12,920 Speaker 1: the worse off it might be for him and liberals 339 00:16:12,920 --> 00:16:17,400 Speaker 1: by kicking him off of Twitter, Facebook, basically, you know, 340 00:16:17,480 --> 00:16:21,440 Speaker 1: deplatforming him, getting him out of people's faces have actually 341 00:16:21,480 --> 00:16:24,880 Speaker 1: done the thing that Trump's advisors were trying to do 342 00:16:25,880 --> 00:16:29,600 Speaker 1: for years, just getting him to calm down and stop 343 00:16:29,680 --> 00:16:32,040 Speaker 1: putting his foot in his mouth and saying outrageous things 344 00:16:32,040 --> 00:16:37,920 Speaker 1: that infuriated people. Nobody could accomplish that except for the 345 00:16:37,960 --> 00:16:41,280 Speaker 1: social media platforms driven by kind of democratic. 346 00:16:40,760 --> 00:16:43,520 Speaker 3: Outrage, and yeah, nobody's on true social and so with now. 347 00:16:43,480 --> 00:16:45,080 Speaker 1: They got to bring him back and put him people's 348 00:16:45,080 --> 00:16:47,680 Speaker 1: face and be like, remember this guy, like you liked 349 00:16:47,720 --> 00:16:50,120 Speaker 1: the economy under him, but you didn't like him. Remember 350 00:16:50,160 --> 00:16:52,120 Speaker 1: that and hope that that's enough. 351 00:16:55,000 --> 00:16:57,360 Speaker 3: Let's move on to some of the most interesting news 352 00:16:57,360 --> 00:17:01,680 Speaker 3: playing out right now, especially in York sixteenth district, where 353 00:17:01,800 --> 00:17:06,080 Speaker 3: Jamal Bowman lost his race pretty handily, double digit loss 354 00:17:06,080 --> 00:17:08,960 Speaker 3: for a squad member Jamal Bowman and Ryan I think 355 00:17:08,960 --> 00:17:11,080 Speaker 3: maybe we just run through some of these results quickly 356 00:17:11,080 --> 00:17:13,399 Speaker 3: and then we want to get I especially curious to 357 00:17:13,440 --> 00:17:15,240 Speaker 3: hear what you have to say about what happened to 358 00:17:15,280 --> 00:17:19,080 Speaker 3: Jamal Bowman and APAC and all of that up in 359 00:17:19,240 --> 00:17:23,200 Speaker 3: New York sixteenth sixteenth. But also Lauren Bobert did win 360 00:17:23,760 --> 00:17:28,720 Speaker 3: that districting ken Bucks. It was ken bucks old seat. 361 00:17:28,760 --> 00:17:33,520 Speaker 3: The Trump back candidate in Utah to replace Romney lost handily. 362 00:17:33,920 --> 00:17:38,000 Speaker 3: It's like a twenty point love Romney twenty Yeah, but Trump, 363 00:17:38,160 --> 00:17:40,719 Speaker 3: I mean, this is this is not There was a 364 00:17:40,800 --> 00:17:44,359 Speaker 3: conversation last week we were talking about Bob good getting 365 00:17:44,359 --> 00:17:47,280 Speaker 3: booted from his seat. He's the chairman of the Freedom Caucus. 366 00:17:47,280 --> 00:17:49,720 Speaker 3: We interviewed him a couple of months ago, and people 367 00:17:49,720 --> 00:17:52,399 Speaker 3: were saying, well was the Trump factor? Trump waded in 368 00:17:52,560 --> 00:17:55,439 Speaker 3: for his opponent, and that's what ded a men really 369 00:17:55,480 --> 00:17:59,840 Speaker 3: mixed bag with Trump endorsements in recent result history, and 370 00:18:00,080 --> 00:18:03,200 Speaker 3: last night was absolutely no exception to that. So those 371 00:18:03,200 --> 00:18:04,879 Speaker 3: are I think a few of the big ones. We 372 00:18:04,960 --> 00:18:07,399 Speaker 3: might touch on a couple of other ones going forward here, 373 00:18:07,440 --> 00:18:10,000 Speaker 3: but let's start with Bowman. Ryan a big, big loss. 374 00:18:10,359 --> 00:18:13,520 Speaker 1: So George Latimer finishes, they're still counting a little bit, 375 00:18:13,600 --> 00:18:16,959 Speaker 1: but he's creeping in on fifty nine percent, fifty eight 376 00:18:17,000 --> 00:18:20,359 Speaker 1: to fifty nine percent, which is about what the polls 377 00:18:20,359 --> 00:18:23,399 Speaker 1: were showing. Like people expected this was going to be 378 00:18:23,920 --> 00:18:27,800 Speaker 1: a landslide. Daniel Maren's over, my old colleague over at 379 00:18:27,800 --> 00:18:30,320 Speaker 1: the Hoffington Post has a really good kind of rundown 380 00:18:30,320 --> 00:18:35,159 Speaker 1: of this race that gets into the retail political I 381 00:18:35,160 --> 00:18:36,800 Speaker 1: don't know if you want to call the mistakes that 382 00:18:36,880 --> 00:18:39,920 Speaker 1: Bowman made over the last couple of years, because mistakes 383 00:18:39,920 --> 00:18:44,280 Speaker 1: implies that he didn't do it on purpose, like what 384 00:18:44,920 --> 00:18:49,199 Speaker 1: Bowman in twenty twenty one took a trip sponsored by 385 00:18:49,240 --> 00:18:54,600 Speaker 1: j Street to visit Israel, and Jay Street had endorsed 386 00:18:54,680 --> 00:18:57,280 Speaker 1: him in twenty twenty against Elliott Engel obviously a pro 387 00:18:57,359 --> 00:19:00,640 Speaker 1: Israel group, a pro Israel, but it's liberal Zionist. It's 388 00:19:00,880 --> 00:19:03,359 Speaker 1: kind of They fight with APAK a lot, and in 389 00:19:03,400 --> 00:19:07,600 Speaker 1: twenty twenty two in particular, they were kind of a 390 00:19:07,880 --> 00:19:10,560 Speaker 1: leading element of the coalition that was fighting back against 391 00:19:10,640 --> 00:19:13,320 Speaker 1: APAC while APAK was spending millions of dollars trying to 392 00:19:13,359 --> 00:19:17,800 Speaker 1: take out like squad like members. In twenty twenty, Bowman 393 00:19:17,920 --> 00:19:21,360 Speaker 1: came in DMFI, which was the kind of proto APAC. 394 00:19:21,480 --> 00:19:25,040 Speaker 1: Super Pac spent about two million dollars against Bowman trying 395 00:19:25,080 --> 00:19:28,040 Speaker 1: to buck up Elliott Engle, who was the chairman of 396 00:19:28,119 --> 00:19:32,040 Speaker 1: the Foreign Affairs Committee and one of the leading Israel 397 00:19:32,080 --> 00:19:35,960 Speaker 1: Hawks in Congress. And so for Angle to go down 398 00:19:36,040 --> 00:19:38,280 Speaker 1: was a huge deal. And despite that two million dollars 399 00:19:38,280 --> 00:19:42,600 Speaker 1: in spending, Bowman beat him. Israel Palis and wasn't a 400 00:19:42,640 --> 00:19:46,000 Speaker 1: huge part of the race at the time. It was 401 00:19:46,040 --> 00:19:48,960 Speaker 1: what drove the funding, but it wasn't what drove the 402 00:19:49,040 --> 00:19:51,720 Speaker 1: kind of public conversation about the race. Remember, this was 403 00:19:51,760 --> 00:19:55,119 Speaker 1: the height of the George Floyd protests and Elliot Angle 404 00:19:55,200 --> 00:19:58,840 Speaker 1: had this absolutely monumental gaff where he went to a 405 00:19:58,920 --> 00:20:01,520 Speaker 1: George Floyd rally and he was caught on an open 406 00:20:01,600 --> 00:20:05,800 Speaker 1: mic trying to speak and the guy running the rally 407 00:20:05,880 --> 00:20:08,399 Speaker 1: is like, look, so many elected officials here were not 408 00:20:08,480 --> 00:20:10,720 Speaker 1: letting everybody speak. Well, you know it's hot out here. 409 00:20:10,800 --> 00:20:14,480 Speaker 1: We'll be here all day. And he said, I wouldn't 410 00:20:14,480 --> 00:20:17,160 Speaker 1: ask if I didn't have a primary. I wouldn't even 411 00:20:17,160 --> 00:20:18,840 Speaker 1: be here if I didn't have a primary. Led it, 412 00:20:18,840 --> 00:20:20,320 Speaker 1: and it was on the hot mic, it was on 413 00:20:20,400 --> 00:20:24,080 Speaker 1: New York One. It's like wow, and it fed into 414 00:20:24,920 --> 00:20:27,800 Speaker 1: a that's a tone deaf thing to stay at the 415 00:20:27,840 --> 00:20:30,800 Speaker 1: height of the George Floyd protests. And also he was 416 00:20:30,840 --> 00:20:33,919 Speaker 1: caught living in Maryland at the time, Like a reporter 417 00:20:34,000 --> 00:20:36,120 Speaker 1: went to his door in Maryland and found him there. 418 00:20:36,680 --> 00:20:39,679 Speaker 1: And you've been claiming you've been at these events in 419 00:20:39,720 --> 00:20:41,280 Speaker 1: New York, but you haven't been in New York at all. 420 00:20:41,320 --> 00:20:43,439 Speaker 1: He's like, I've been in both places. And there's no 421 00:20:43,480 --> 00:20:45,399 Speaker 1: evidence he'd been in both places at all. He'd just 422 00:20:45,440 --> 00:20:49,000 Speaker 1: been in Maryland. So the two things came together created 423 00:20:49,040 --> 00:20:53,159 Speaker 1: a big scandal and Bowman crushed him, even in heavily 424 00:20:53,200 --> 00:20:57,919 Speaker 1: Jewish precincts. Twenty twenty one, Jay Street takes him to 425 00:20:58,000 --> 00:21:03,879 Speaker 1: Israel and Apak takes lawmakers to Israel on these guided 426 00:21:03,920 --> 00:21:08,080 Speaker 1: tours every two years. Run Steney Hoyer organizes these trips 427 00:21:08,080 --> 00:21:12,600 Speaker 1: their bipartisan and they come back fortified in their support 428 00:21:12,840 --> 00:21:17,280 Speaker 1: for Israel. Jamal Bowman came back from that trip to 429 00:21:17,359 --> 00:21:21,320 Speaker 1: Israel a changed person, and he's talked about this, like 430 00:21:22,000 --> 00:21:27,080 Speaker 1: seeing the occupation up close in the West Bank, seeing 431 00:21:28,200 --> 00:21:32,440 Speaker 1: that Muslims could not or Palestinians could not go down 432 00:21:32,480 --> 00:21:36,199 Speaker 1: certain roads, seeing the fencing. There's this one famous street 433 00:21:37,520 --> 00:21:40,359 Speaker 1: that has kind of netting over top of the street, 434 00:21:40,400 --> 00:21:44,800 Speaker 1: and I think it's in Hebron because so many of 435 00:21:44,840 --> 00:21:48,639 Speaker 1: the Jewish Israeli settlers there throw trash onto the street 436 00:21:48,840 --> 00:21:51,320 Speaker 1: from their settlements, so they eventually had to put up 437 00:21:51,320 --> 00:21:56,040 Speaker 1: a net. The highways where you can't drive if you 438 00:21:56,080 --> 00:21:58,000 Speaker 1: don't have the right license plate. You have to have 439 00:21:58,040 --> 00:22:00,879 Speaker 1: certain permits to get different areas. He was shocked to 440 00:22:00,920 --> 00:22:03,880 Speaker 1: his core, and so that's why I say I wouldn't 441 00:22:03,880 --> 00:22:07,200 Speaker 1: describe the political decisions he made after that a mistakes, 442 00:22:07,240 --> 00:22:10,800 Speaker 1: because he decided that this was wrong and this was 443 00:22:10,800 --> 00:22:13,320 Speaker 1: something he was going to stand up for now. He 444 00:22:13,400 --> 00:22:16,560 Speaker 1: did in the time since then, he did not build 445 00:22:16,840 --> 00:22:22,080 Speaker 1: inroads into the Jewish community. He did not come to 446 00:22:22,200 --> 00:22:24,480 Speaker 1: the synagogues. And this is what they say, that he 447 00:22:24,520 --> 00:22:26,760 Speaker 1: didn't come to the synagogues and have this dialogue with them. 448 00:22:26,880 --> 00:22:29,000 Speaker 1: He didn't talk to them about his experience that he'd 449 00:22:29,000 --> 00:22:32,000 Speaker 1: had there. It was it was more of just a 450 00:22:32,040 --> 00:22:36,520 Speaker 1: public kind of political campaign that he was running, and 451 00:22:36,680 --> 00:22:38,960 Speaker 1: that's what he felt was appropriate. But what it did 452 00:22:39,040 --> 00:22:41,640 Speaker 1: is it drove this wedge even among say the liberals 453 00:22:41,760 --> 00:22:43,440 Speaker 1: in his district, who might say, you know what, I 454 00:22:43,480 --> 00:22:45,520 Speaker 1: agree with you, I'm against the occupation and again this 455 00:22:45,560 --> 00:22:48,520 Speaker 1: and that they felt like they had just kind of 456 00:22:48,560 --> 00:22:52,240 Speaker 1: lost touch with him, and he didn't care about that community. 457 00:22:53,080 --> 00:22:58,480 Speaker 1: And so it's interesting that Apak spent nearly twenty million 458 00:22:58,480 --> 00:23:01,520 Speaker 1: dollars in this race because his initial race is what 459 00:23:01,600 --> 00:23:04,840 Speaker 1: basically brought a pack into the Super Pac game. Like 460 00:23:05,119 --> 00:23:08,560 Speaker 1: DMFI spending two million dollars and losing to Jamal Bowman 461 00:23:09,280 --> 00:23:13,040 Speaker 1: convinced a pack, Okay, DMFI is not cut out for 462 00:23:13,080 --> 00:23:15,840 Speaker 1: this on its own. Yeah, they're raising five ten million 463 00:23:15,880 --> 00:23:18,639 Speaker 1: dollars a year. We can do much better than that. 464 00:23:18,960 --> 00:23:22,440 Speaker 1: That's why they came in in twenty twenty two and 465 00:23:22,560 --> 00:23:25,560 Speaker 1: spent thirty forty fifty million dollars. And why they came 466 00:23:25,560 --> 00:23:27,840 Speaker 1: in and just spent nearly twenty million just in this race. 467 00:23:27,920 --> 00:23:30,520 Speaker 3: What was wasn't it fourteen? The total somewhere like fourteen 468 00:23:30,600 --> 00:23:34,040 Speaker 3: point for Bowman this race. 469 00:23:34,200 --> 00:23:36,600 Speaker 1: I saw seventeen, but I don't think we've seen a 470 00:23:36,600 --> 00:23:37,440 Speaker 1: final number either. 471 00:23:37,600 --> 00:23:39,880 Speaker 3: I mean, either way, it is the most expensive race, 472 00:23:39,960 --> 00:23:42,440 Speaker 3: and all because of a pack. It's the most expensive 473 00:23:42,680 --> 00:23:45,520 Speaker 3: what house race in the history of house races? 474 00:23:45,600 --> 00:23:50,760 Speaker 1: Yes, it is, and that's including the David Trone, like 475 00:23:50,920 --> 00:23:54,800 Speaker 1: the total Wine guy who spent like twelve of his 476 00:23:54,920 --> 00:23:58,679 Speaker 1: own million dollars to finish in third place in one 477 00:23:58,800 --> 00:24:01,359 Speaker 1: race and then spent more than like roughly that to 478 00:24:01,440 --> 00:24:04,640 Speaker 1: finally win, and god knows what he's spent to lose 479 00:24:04,680 --> 00:24:07,119 Speaker 1: his Senate race this year. That's a I forgot. That's 480 00:24:07,119 --> 00:24:09,679 Speaker 1: a different question. Yeah, most expensive race in history. But 481 00:24:09,720 --> 00:24:13,280 Speaker 1: it's also this New York like buying airtime in New 482 00:24:13,400 --> 00:24:19,120 Speaker 1: York is insanely expensive, and to blanket the airwaves, especially 483 00:24:19,119 --> 00:24:20,920 Speaker 1: when you have to buy New York air, but it's 484 00:24:20,960 --> 00:24:23,480 Speaker 1: like suburban New York that you're actually aiming for is 485 00:24:23,840 --> 00:24:25,560 Speaker 1: going to cost you an enormous amount of money. 486 00:24:25,800 --> 00:24:29,320 Speaker 3: So interestingly, there was a report in Axios this morning 487 00:24:29,560 --> 00:24:33,560 Speaker 3: after Bowman as the dust was kind of clearing. That 488 00:24:33,720 --> 00:24:36,960 Speaker 3: quoted a House Democrat saying it felt kind of gross 489 00:24:37,000 --> 00:24:39,080 Speaker 3: the amount of money that had been spent on the 490 00:24:39,119 --> 00:24:42,199 Speaker 3: Bowman race, and that like a pack. It was this 491 00:24:42,280 --> 00:24:45,800 Speaker 3: sort of rebut not rebuttal. It was this rebuke almost 492 00:24:45,880 --> 00:24:47,920 Speaker 3: off the record. Of course all of these people were 493 00:24:47,920 --> 00:24:50,639 Speaker 3: talking off the record, but of how APAC had handled 494 00:24:50,640 --> 00:24:54,000 Speaker 3: this race, saying this was too much. It was it's 495 00:24:54,040 --> 00:24:56,719 Speaker 3: not even this from people who are sounded like very 496 00:24:56,720 --> 00:25:00,840 Speaker 3: supportive of APAC, saying this is starting to actually undermine 497 00:25:01,359 --> 00:25:04,040 Speaker 3: your cause and give people reason to say you're out 498 00:25:04,040 --> 00:25:08,080 Speaker 3: here putting gross amounts of money to buy races, and 499 00:25:08,160 --> 00:25:11,840 Speaker 3: it's not feeling like so democratic anymore. It's feeling a 500 00:25:11,840 --> 00:25:13,280 Speaker 3: little bit like big money. 501 00:25:13,440 --> 00:25:16,080 Speaker 1: And if you look at APAX donors, they're mostly Republicans, 502 00:25:16,160 --> 00:25:19,359 Speaker 1: which bothers Democrats more than the fact that it's APACK. 503 00:25:19,440 --> 00:25:21,840 Speaker 3: Although not the voters in New York sixteen. 504 00:25:22,040 --> 00:25:25,439 Speaker 1: Well, it's not as if. It's not as if the 505 00:25:25,480 --> 00:25:28,720 Speaker 1: ads say funded by Republican donors who have given money 506 00:25:28,760 --> 00:25:31,240 Speaker 1: to APACK. It says this ad was supported by United 507 00:25:31,240 --> 00:25:35,399 Speaker 1: Democracy Project like I'm for United Democracies. Also was great well. 508 00:25:35,400 --> 00:25:38,720 Speaker 3: I also thought Latimer's messaging was interesting with the way 509 00:25:38,720 --> 00:25:43,119 Speaker 3: Bowman ran his campaign, where Latimer Latimer was saying, I 510 00:25:43,160 --> 00:25:46,399 Speaker 3: won't want to end the chaos in Washington, DC, and 511 00:25:46,440 --> 00:25:48,760 Speaker 3: then just in the last few days. I'm sure actually 512 00:25:48,760 --> 00:25:51,400 Speaker 3: in April poll matched the results that we got last 513 00:25:51,440 --> 00:25:56,440 Speaker 3: night pretty closely. But you have the chaos if you're 514 00:25:56,680 --> 00:25:58,560 Speaker 3: a voter. Was just trying to feed your family, take your 515 00:25:58,600 --> 00:26:02,640 Speaker 3: kids of soccerbractics or whatever. Looking at Jamal Bowman like 516 00:26:02,800 --> 00:26:06,960 Speaker 3: jumping around saying fa pack whatever else he said, and 517 00:26:07,000 --> 00:26:10,679 Speaker 3: then a guy and also the whole fire thing, the 518 00:26:10,760 --> 00:26:14,879 Speaker 3: nine to eleven conspiracy theories, which don't always play so 519 00:26:14,960 --> 00:26:18,199 Speaker 3: well in New York. And he had walked back, you know, 520 00:26:18,480 --> 00:26:21,800 Speaker 3: sort of on a parallel track with Mersher, Taylor Green, you. 521 00:26:21,800 --> 00:26:25,520 Speaker 1: Know, and a lot of anti Bowman people, to your 522 00:26:25,600 --> 00:26:29,639 Speaker 1: point about APAC's gross amount of spending, are frustrated that 523 00:26:29,680 --> 00:26:32,080 Speaker 1: APEX spends so much money because now they can't make 524 00:26:32,119 --> 00:26:35,919 Speaker 1: the argument that Bowman was unpopular yep, and that his 525 00:26:36,119 --> 00:26:40,840 Speaker 1: constituents rejected his brand of politics, you know, fair and square, right, 526 00:26:40,880 --> 00:26:43,040 Speaker 1: but you just can't say that you can you can 527 00:26:43,119 --> 00:26:46,359 Speaker 1: believe it, And I've heard people make a reasonable case 528 00:26:46,359 --> 00:26:50,880 Speaker 1: that Latimer, absent interventions from either side, might have beaten 529 00:26:50,960 --> 00:26:53,040 Speaker 1: Jamal Bowman because of the district that he's running in 530 00:26:53,160 --> 00:26:57,879 Speaker 1: the politics around it. But nobody can say that with 531 00:26:57,920 --> 00:27:01,240 Speaker 1: any confidence because that's not what happened. A pack came 532 00:27:01,280 --> 00:27:03,679 Speaker 1: in and dropped at least you know, we'll see the 533 00:27:03,720 --> 00:27:07,080 Speaker 1: final total in the end, but you know, more money 534 00:27:07,080 --> 00:27:09,679 Speaker 1: than has ever been dropped by any single organization in 535 00:27:09,720 --> 00:27:13,199 Speaker 1: a in a congressional race before, and that obviously tilts 536 00:27:13,240 --> 00:27:16,800 Speaker 1: the scale, and so now it it makes it so 537 00:27:16,920 --> 00:27:21,080 Speaker 1: that nobody has to actually talk about the issues at play, 538 00:27:21,280 --> 00:27:23,400 Speaker 1: and instead both sides you can say, look at look 539 00:27:23,400 --> 00:27:25,560 Speaker 1: at look at the sheer amount of money. And from 540 00:27:25,600 --> 00:27:28,000 Speaker 1: the Democratic side, and we're going to talk about this 541 00:27:28,080 --> 00:27:30,960 Speaker 1: later in our in our a PAC block, it is 542 00:27:31,280 --> 00:27:33,760 Speaker 1: this isn't the A pack block right right? It is 543 00:27:33,840 --> 00:27:39,000 Speaker 1: wild that Democrats are allowing in democratic primaries Republican billionaires 544 00:27:39,480 --> 00:27:44,200 Speaker 1: to funnel so much money into their primaries. It's kind 545 00:27:44,200 --> 00:27:47,640 Speaker 1: of an incredible situation and I just don't think Republicans 546 00:27:47,680 --> 00:27:48,399 Speaker 1: would ever allow that. 547 00:27:48,720 --> 00:27:52,119 Speaker 3: I also think progressives and you know, Corey Bush is 548 00:27:52,200 --> 00:27:54,240 Speaker 3: while worth talking about in this context, looks like she 549 00:27:54,359 --> 00:27:55,159 Speaker 3: might lose her. 550 00:27:55,040 --> 00:27:58,280 Speaker 1: Primary tough one Elan O. Mar's got a tough race. 551 00:27:58,359 --> 00:28:02,560 Speaker 3: A nail bider in Minnesota with Ohan Omar. I think 552 00:28:02,600 --> 00:28:07,760 Speaker 3: progressives have struggled to connect these really front and center, 553 00:28:08,040 --> 00:28:11,240 Speaker 3: high profile discussions about Israel and Palestine to the material 554 00:28:11,280 --> 00:28:14,840 Speaker 3: concerns of some of their voters who for whatever reason, 555 00:28:15,000 --> 00:28:17,320 Speaker 3: and we can all disagree with the reasons, but just 556 00:28:17,560 --> 00:28:19,959 Speaker 3: don't care as much about the issue. 557 00:28:20,840 --> 00:28:24,240 Speaker 1: This is the only district where they where they even 558 00:28:24,440 --> 00:28:28,080 Speaker 1: talked somewhat about Israel Palestine. When APAK runs its ads, 559 00:28:28,800 --> 00:28:30,920 Speaker 1: even in this district, they were they were not about 560 00:28:30,960 --> 00:28:33,680 Speaker 1: Israel Palestine, like when they were going after Bowman. They're 561 00:28:33,680 --> 00:28:35,960 Speaker 1: going after Bowman for not being a loyal enough Democrat 562 00:28:36,240 --> 00:28:38,520 Speaker 1: with holding his vote on the infrastructure bill like that. 563 00:28:38,680 --> 00:28:40,120 Speaker 3: I'm sure they dugged that Opo and. 564 00:28:41,640 --> 00:28:45,160 Speaker 1: Like Firepole on the fire alarm. 565 00:28:44,800 --> 00:28:47,240 Speaker 3: Which he should not have done, and then he shouldn't. 566 00:28:46,880 --> 00:28:49,280 Speaker 1: Have lied about it like he's a principal, and so 567 00:28:49,360 --> 00:28:52,000 Speaker 1: that I think that hurt him because like principles know 568 00:28:52,080 --> 00:28:53,240 Speaker 1: how fire alarms. 569 00:28:52,880 --> 00:28:54,720 Speaker 3: Were, like he thought it was the door, is what 570 00:28:54,760 --> 00:28:55,080 Speaker 3: he said. 571 00:28:55,240 --> 00:29:00,560 Speaker 1: And so even a PAK like doesn't run on Israel Palestine. Right, 572 00:29:00,680 --> 00:29:02,719 Speaker 1: they pull what they think is going to be damaging 573 00:29:02,760 --> 00:29:04,280 Speaker 1: to their opponent and then they run on that. 574 00:29:04,520 --> 00:29:06,360 Speaker 3: But they I mean, the candid it's what they're I mean, 575 00:29:06,360 --> 00:29:08,160 Speaker 3: it's the reality they're facing, is that it's going to 576 00:29:08,200 --> 00:29:10,360 Speaker 3: get I mean, it's going to get dragged into the 577 00:29:10,360 --> 00:29:12,720 Speaker 3: center of the race, even if APAC knows that it's 578 00:29:12,760 --> 00:29:16,000 Speaker 3: not front and center concerns of voters and media conversation 579 00:29:16,080 --> 00:29:17,040 Speaker 3: about Corey Bush. 580 00:29:17,120 --> 00:29:19,479 Speaker 1: I mean, it's what it's the media conversation, but like 581 00:29:19,520 --> 00:29:22,040 Speaker 1: on the ground, so it will be Wesley Bell versus 582 00:29:22,040 --> 00:29:25,560 Speaker 1: Corey Bush. It's the ads are not going to be 583 00:29:25,560 --> 00:29:29,280 Speaker 1: about Israel palestime for the most part. You know, Corey 584 00:29:29,280 --> 00:29:31,280 Speaker 1: Bush will be talking about how she stood up for 585 00:29:31,720 --> 00:29:34,840 Speaker 1: renters and fought against the ending the foreclosure more time, 586 00:29:34,920 --> 00:29:37,480 Speaker 1: and I guess deliver for Saint Louis that she's brought 587 00:29:37,480 --> 00:29:41,080 Speaker 1: back money like Summer League did in Pittsburgh, whereas Wesley 588 00:29:41,120 --> 00:29:43,080 Speaker 1: Bell will say it's too much drama. 589 00:29:43,240 --> 00:29:44,520 Speaker 3: You know, well that's what I was going to say 590 00:29:44,640 --> 00:29:46,520 Speaker 3: a guy like me, And I think it just plays 591 00:29:46,520 --> 00:29:51,160 Speaker 3: into the broader narrative of chaos and like an extremism. 592 00:29:51,320 --> 00:29:55,160 Speaker 3: And I do think that progressive Democrats need to find 593 00:29:55,160 --> 00:29:57,720 Speaker 3: a better way to talk about the issue that neutralizes 594 00:29:57,760 --> 00:30:01,280 Speaker 3: that just the reality that it's going to be used as. 595 00:30:00,600 --> 00:30:04,720 Speaker 1: I mean, Summerly basically showed how to do that, and 596 00:30:04,760 --> 00:30:08,920 Speaker 1: Corey Bush is kind of modeling her campaign after summer Lease. 597 00:30:08,920 --> 00:30:11,800 Speaker 1: Summer Ly. If you look at her, she's basically a 598 00:30:11,840 --> 00:30:13,360 Speaker 1: squad member of you. But if you look at her 599 00:30:13,520 --> 00:30:17,240 Speaker 1: advertising and her messaging in Pittsburgh, it's indistinguishable from a 600 00:30:17,280 --> 00:30:21,520 Speaker 1: normal Democrat. And that's to the point that if you 601 00:30:21,560 --> 00:30:23,680 Speaker 1: have a big turnout in a Democratic primary election, there 602 00:30:23,680 --> 00:30:26,160 Speaker 1: are a lot of normy Democrats who that's just what 603 00:30:26,200 --> 00:30:26,560 Speaker 1: they want. 604 00:30:29,760 --> 00:30:31,040 Speaker 3: Let's talk about Lauren Bobert. 605 00:30:31,280 --> 00:30:32,560 Speaker 1: Why not normies? 606 00:30:32,960 --> 00:30:38,240 Speaker 3: Yes, Lauren Bobert won her primary and the Beetlejuice district. 607 00:30:39,080 --> 00:30:40,720 Speaker 3: Kidding you remember the Beetlejuice story. 608 00:30:41,600 --> 00:30:42,920 Speaker 1: Oh my god, the play. 609 00:30:43,080 --> 00:30:45,000 Speaker 3: I'm sorry that I had to remind you of that 610 00:30:45,840 --> 00:30:49,080 Speaker 3: because the image is indoubtable. But we have the results 611 00:30:49,080 --> 00:30:51,800 Speaker 3: from Lauren Bobert's race. This turned out to be a 612 00:30:51,800 --> 00:30:55,680 Speaker 3: pretty healthy district, pretty healthy primary win for her forty 613 00:30:55,680 --> 00:30:59,680 Speaker 3: three points, though she didn't get over half because the 614 00:31:00,040 --> 00:31:01,680 Speaker 3: so the vote was split between all of these other 615 00:31:01,720 --> 00:31:04,800 Speaker 3: candidates This is ken Buckelle District. As we mentioned right 616 00:31:04,880 --> 00:31:08,520 Speaker 3: up at the top. What's very interesting about this situation 617 00:31:08,840 --> 00:31:14,320 Speaker 3: is that the establishment guy, Jeff Hurd, he won the 618 00:31:14,360 --> 00:31:19,640 Speaker 3: Republican primary in Lauren Bobert's current district, so the third 619 00:31:19,720 --> 00:31:23,000 Speaker 3: congressional district. She switched districts feeling like she was going 620 00:31:23,040 --> 00:31:25,520 Speaker 3: to lose, and she probably would have lost. Actually we 621 00:31:25,520 --> 00:31:28,440 Speaker 3: don't know, but she probably would have lost from that 622 00:31:28,520 --> 00:31:32,880 Speaker 3: third district outside Denver to this district, which is I believe, Yeah, 623 00:31:32,880 --> 00:31:36,400 Speaker 3: it's the fourth congressional district, and the establishment guy, not 624 00:31:36,480 --> 00:31:39,240 Speaker 3: a big maga guy, is the one who ended up 625 00:31:39,280 --> 00:31:43,600 Speaker 3: winning her actual district that she'll be vacating obviously moving 626 00:31:43,640 --> 00:31:44,640 Speaker 3: over to this new district. 627 00:31:44,680 --> 00:31:47,880 Speaker 1: Now, now, in Texas, you have to get over fifty 628 00:31:47,880 --> 00:31:50,960 Speaker 1: percent in a primary or you go to a runoff. 629 00:31:51,560 --> 00:31:55,480 Speaker 1: So if the Republicans in Colorado were running on the 630 00:31:55,520 --> 00:31:59,560 Speaker 1: Texas primary model, you now have a runoff between Bobert 631 00:31:59,600 --> 00:32:04,320 Speaker 1: and what was her name, Jenny, the second place candidate there. 632 00:32:05,280 --> 00:32:07,520 Speaker 1: How do you think that goes? Do you think that 633 00:32:07,960 --> 00:32:11,040 Speaker 1: there's enough anti Bobert sentiment in that district that she 634 00:32:11,160 --> 00:32:14,440 Speaker 1: actually ends up losing and that she only won because 635 00:32:14,480 --> 00:32:17,000 Speaker 1: the anti Bobert vote was split, or do you think 636 00:32:17,080 --> 00:32:20,600 Speaker 1: that a decent number of those candidates had as a 637 00:32:20,640 --> 00:32:24,400 Speaker 1: second choice Bobert so that she'd win in a primary anyway, 638 00:32:25,600 --> 00:32:28,280 Speaker 1: Because the point here is that Bowman last year had 639 00:32:28,320 --> 00:32:31,200 Speaker 1: two opponents. To last election had two opponents, and he 640 00:32:31,280 --> 00:32:33,480 Speaker 1: got like fifty four percent of the vote. He won 641 00:32:33,520 --> 00:32:36,720 Speaker 1: comfortably because they split the anti Bowman vote, But for 642 00:32:36,760 --> 00:32:39,600 Speaker 1: people watching closely, it was a warning sign, like, oh, 643 00:32:40,240 --> 00:32:43,520 Speaker 1: you were just four percentage points over a majority. You 644 00:32:43,640 --> 00:32:46,440 Speaker 1: could have lost that race if there was a single 645 00:32:46,480 --> 00:32:48,920 Speaker 1: opponent against you. She's only forty three. 646 00:32:49,160 --> 00:32:51,720 Speaker 3: She reminds me. Her problems remind me of Bowman's in 647 00:32:51,760 --> 00:32:54,920 Speaker 3: some respect, just thinking about the fire alarm situation and 648 00:32:54,960 --> 00:32:57,200 Speaker 3: the OPO that was dragged out on his previous sort 649 00:32:57,240 --> 00:33:02,560 Speaker 3: of poetry blog that dabbled in nine to eleven truth theorism, 650 00:33:02,880 --> 00:33:04,640 Speaker 3: and also kind of reminds me of Marjorie Tayler Green. 651 00:33:04,640 --> 00:33:07,000 Speaker 3: I made a joke about that earlier, the sort of 652 00:33:07,120 --> 00:33:11,400 Speaker 3: media double standard aside. I think it's really interesting that 653 00:33:11,480 --> 00:33:16,880 Speaker 3: people who are like now in Congress were pulled in 654 00:33:16,920 --> 00:33:20,000 Speaker 3: those directions, because I think it's tempting for all of 655 00:33:20,080 --> 00:33:23,160 Speaker 3: us and I don't think it's isolated to them, And 656 00:33:23,240 --> 00:33:27,400 Speaker 3: I think the populism in particular, when you're seeking out 657 00:33:27,440 --> 00:33:34,880 Speaker 3: explanations for the just rapid changes de industrialization, material concerns 658 00:33:35,320 --> 00:33:39,440 Speaker 3: that have accelerated, you know, it's not crazy to get 659 00:33:39,480 --> 00:33:43,480 Speaker 3: pulled down in crazy directions. You just have to sort 660 00:33:43,520 --> 00:33:45,800 Speaker 3: of be vigilant against those things. But I think Lauren 661 00:33:45,840 --> 00:33:49,640 Speaker 3: Bobert with Jamal Bowman in that sort of fire alarm 662 00:33:49,720 --> 00:33:54,520 Speaker 3: versus beetlejuice situation, they just look ridiculous. And I know 663 00:33:54,720 --> 00:33:57,480 Speaker 3: Lauren Bobert ran on she used to own a bar 664 00:33:57,640 --> 00:34:01,440 Speaker 3: right that was like a Second Amendment the bar basically 665 00:34:01,520 --> 00:34:03,480 Speaker 3: like a gun themed bar. I think it was called 666 00:34:03,520 --> 00:34:04,800 Speaker 3: Shooters something like that. 667 00:34:05,080 --> 00:34:08,560 Speaker 1: If you like, it had more health code violations. 668 00:34:08,000 --> 00:34:12,280 Speaker 3: Than like did it really so SI had a good restaurant. 669 00:34:13,920 --> 00:34:18,960 Speaker 3: But yeah, I mean I think there's she just lost 670 00:34:19,000 --> 00:34:22,200 Speaker 3: a lot of you know, even as like this populous, 671 00:34:22,440 --> 00:34:22,719 Speaker 3: and to. 672 00:34:22,640 --> 00:34:24,840 Speaker 1: Survive, she jumped districts. I wonder what would have happened 673 00:34:24,880 --> 00:34:30,080 Speaker 1: if Bowman jumped districts and ran against Richie Torres and numbers. 674 00:34:31,000 --> 00:34:32,000 Speaker 3: That's super interesting. 675 00:34:32,080 --> 00:34:33,719 Speaker 1: Maybe two years from now that's what he'll do. 676 00:34:34,000 --> 00:34:36,080 Speaker 3: I think. I think Boba probably would have lost, but 677 00:34:36,120 --> 00:34:38,080 Speaker 3: it's hard to say, just given how much money that 678 00:34:38,120 --> 00:34:40,600 Speaker 3: you can raise when you are super maga. Right now, 679 00:34:41,320 --> 00:34:43,560 Speaker 3: I don't know how Trump would have dealt with anything 680 00:34:43,680 --> 00:34:46,320 Speaker 3: like that. That reminds me to read this Dave Wiggle tweet. 681 00:34:46,320 --> 00:34:48,120 Speaker 3: He said this might be the worst primary night for 682 00:34:48,120 --> 00:34:51,960 Speaker 3: Trump endorsed GP candidates all year. Burns loses narrowly in 683 00:34:52,080 --> 00:34:56,520 Speaker 3: South Carolina, Dave Williams getting crushed in Colorado. Five all 684 00:34:56,560 --> 00:34:59,839 Speaker 3: before the Utah Senate race comes in and Pol's had 685 00:35:00,040 --> 00:35:03,719 Speaker 3: voted Trump back Trent Stags down big, And indeed Trent 686 00:35:03,800 --> 00:35:07,920 Speaker 3: Stags did go down to John Curtis, who ended up 687 00:35:08,280 --> 00:35:11,759 Speaker 3: winning the primary for that Romney seat. We can put 688 00:35:11,760 --> 00:35:14,160 Speaker 3: that up on the screen. That's be five. He was 689 00:35:14,800 --> 00:35:19,040 Speaker 3: definitely not the Trump pick in the Utah race and 690 00:35:19,200 --> 00:35:23,440 Speaker 3: ended up winning by double digits fifty endors thirty. I 691 00:35:23,440 --> 00:35:27,200 Speaker 3: believe Romney did endorse John Curtise. Yeah, he's like people 692 00:35:27,200 --> 00:35:30,759 Speaker 3: see him as like a Romney two point zero kind 693 00:35:30,760 --> 00:35:31,640 Speaker 3: of if. 694 00:35:31,520 --> 00:35:34,399 Speaker 1: That makes sense, And I've seen political scientists say that, 695 00:35:36,040 --> 00:35:40,680 Speaker 1: if not for the counterfactual of Joseph Smith wandering out 696 00:35:40,680 --> 00:35:44,680 Speaker 1: to Utah and creating Mormonism, out there that Utah would 697 00:35:44,680 --> 00:35:48,520 Speaker 1: actually be a blue state because of the if in 698 00:35:48,560 --> 00:35:53,120 Speaker 1: other words, if Utah residents voted the same way as 699 00:35:54,320 --> 00:35:57,879 Speaker 1: you know, urban suburban and ex urban voters and role 700 00:35:57,960 --> 00:36:01,279 Speaker 1: voters vote in every other state in the country, there 701 00:36:01,280 --> 00:36:05,680 Speaker 1: are enough urban and suburban voters just concentrated around Salt 702 00:36:05,760 --> 00:36:09,360 Speaker 1: Lake City that it would be a democratic state. But 703 00:36:10,120 --> 00:36:14,239 Speaker 1: because of Mormonism and the conservative strain in it, it's 704 00:36:14,280 --> 00:36:17,799 Speaker 1: a red state. But that would also explain why it 705 00:36:17,880 --> 00:36:21,200 Speaker 1: is anti Trump and trends toward this kind of Curtis 706 00:36:21,239 --> 00:36:21,920 Speaker 1: Romney style. 707 00:36:22,160 --> 00:36:24,480 Speaker 3: Yeah, the governor Spencer Cox is also sort of in 708 00:36:24,520 --> 00:36:26,880 Speaker 3: that mold. There's a very particular type of Republican that 709 00:36:26,920 --> 00:36:30,040 Speaker 3: comes from Utah. And it's not behind me right now, 710 00:36:30,080 --> 00:36:32,640 Speaker 3: I just looked. But the book that's behind me sometimes 711 00:36:32,680 --> 00:36:35,000 Speaker 3: is called Alienated America by Tim Carney. In Utah plays 712 00:36:35,000 --> 00:36:37,120 Speaker 3: a big role in that book because it has a 713 00:36:37,160 --> 00:36:42,120 Speaker 3: really high level of sort of civic society, civil society, 714 00:36:42,640 --> 00:36:46,400 Speaker 3: meaning that community bonds are really tight. They have robust 715 00:36:46,440 --> 00:36:49,319 Speaker 3: like rotary clubs and all of that stuff. And it's 716 00:36:49,360 --> 00:36:53,239 Speaker 3: one of the few red states that was not few, 717 00:36:53,280 --> 00:36:55,600 Speaker 3: it's one of the handful of red states that was 718 00:36:55,640 --> 00:36:58,720 Speaker 3: sort of ardently anti Trump in the Republican primary twenty fifteen, 719 00:36:58,840 --> 00:37:03,800 Speaker 3: twenty sixteen, And that is an interesting point along the 720 00:37:03,840 --> 00:37:05,800 Speaker 3: lines of what you were making. If you go to 721 00:37:05,920 --> 00:37:10,960 Speaker 3: you know, rural Wisconsin super like old DEM districts, super 722 00:37:11,000 --> 00:37:14,440 Speaker 3: pro Trump, but in states or in places where the 723 00:37:14,840 --> 00:37:19,520 Speaker 3: social fabric was stronger, southeastern Wisconsin, they're pretty anti Trump 724 00:37:19,719 --> 00:37:22,359 Speaker 3: and anti populism. So I think there's something to that 725 00:37:23,200 --> 00:37:26,360 Speaker 3: about Utah in particular. But it's also hard to extricate 726 00:37:26,400 --> 00:37:28,040 Speaker 3: the Mormonism from the Utahism. 727 00:37:28,080 --> 00:37:31,520 Speaker 1: Too utterly impossible. And if they just solve the drinking 728 00:37:31,600 --> 00:37:34,399 Speaker 1: water problem, you'd all be doing great anything else. 729 00:37:34,440 --> 00:37:38,120 Speaker 3: Oh John avalon CNN guy, But more importantly, I think 730 00:37:38,160 --> 00:37:42,200 Speaker 3: he helped co found no Labels. He won his primary 731 00:37:42,200 --> 00:37:42,800 Speaker 3: in New York. 732 00:37:42,680 --> 00:37:44,879 Speaker 1: As well, Staten Island or something was it? 733 00:37:44,920 --> 00:37:47,480 Speaker 3: Is it the George Santos seat. It's somewhere up that. No, 734 00:37:47,719 --> 00:37:56,600 Speaker 3: it's well, maybe it's New York's first district. But John Avil, Yeah, 735 00:37:56,960 --> 00:38:00,120 Speaker 3: all right, Haiti, we can go ahead and start running 736 00:38:00,160 --> 00:38:03,279 Speaker 3: some of this footage. This is c one. This is 737 00:38:03,320 --> 00:38:07,479 Speaker 3: troops arriving in Porta Prince Kenyan troops arriving in Porta 738 00:38:07,560 --> 00:38:10,360 Speaker 3: Prince yesterday. This block is called Haiti. On the screen, 739 00:38:10,400 --> 00:38:13,239 Speaker 3: it could also be called Kenya though Ryan because this 740 00:38:13,440 --> 00:38:18,080 Speaker 3: was unfolding, called America right, or yeah, this was unfolding 741 00:38:18,320 --> 00:38:21,520 Speaker 3: as just we could literally put it on a split 742 00:38:21,520 --> 00:38:24,600 Speaker 3: screen with what was happening in Nairobi yesterday, which was 743 00:38:24,880 --> 00:38:28,360 Speaker 3: just a demonstration that as of right now, according to 744 00:38:28,360 --> 00:38:31,600 Speaker 3: the Human Rights Commission of Kenya, left twenty to twenty 745 00:38:31,880 --> 00:38:35,759 Speaker 3: two people dead. A section of their parliament, as the 746 00:38:35,760 --> 00:38:40,400 Speaker 3: BBC reported, went up in flames as demonstrations against a 747 00:38:40,480 --> 00:38:44,200 Speaker 3: new tax proposal escalated. I'll keep reading from this BBC report. 748 00:38:44,200 --> 00:38:47,240 Speaker 3: They said protests against an unpopular finance bill, which included 749 00:38:47,280 --> 00:38:50,440 Speaker 3: several tax rises, have been going for days, but they 750 00:38:50,520 --> 00:38:54,719 Speaker 3: escalated on Tuesday as MP's passed an amended bill. Protesters 751 00:38:54,719 --> 00:38:57,680 Speaker 3: broke into Parliament, vandalizing the interior and setting parts of 752 00:38:57,719 --> 00:39:00,640 Speaker 3: the complex on fire. The ceremonial may symbol the authority 753 00:39:00,640 --> 00:39:05,000 Speaker 3: of the legislature was stolen. Police open fire with live ammunition, 754 00:39:05,120 --> 00:39:08,120 Speaker 3: killing at least five people, according to the Kenyan Medical Association. 755 00:39:09,239 --> 00:39:12,240 Speaker 3: This is a quote from twenty four year old named Derek, 756 00:39:12,280 --> 00:39:14,160 Speaker 3: who told the BBC there are some things that are 757 00:39:14,160 --> 00:39:16,920 Speaker 3: hard to understand, like how can you impose a sixteen 758 00:39:17,000 --> 00:39:21,800 Speaker 3: percent tax on bread? How can you tax sanitary pads? 759 00:39:21,880 --> 00:39:24,920 Speaker 3: That was a reference to proposals that were in the 760 00:39:24,960 --> 00:39:28,239 Speaker 3: original bill that fueled some of these protests. We should, 761 00:39:28,320 --> 00:39:31,600 Speaker 3: of course note that this is the troops that landed 762 00:39:31,600 --> 00:39:33,799 Speaker 3: Import of Prince yesterday, the Kenyan troops that landed Import 763 00:39:33,800 --> 00:39:37,359 Speaker 3: of Prince yesterday. It's absolutely part of a US back 764 00:39:37,760 --> 00:39:42,560 Speaker 3: scheme to basically, I mean, we don't know how it's 765 00:39:42,600 --> 00:39:44,640 Speaker 3: going to end. We can probably guess how it's going 766 00:39:44,680 --> 00:39:47,480 Speaker 3: to end, but to engineer the preferred outcome of the 767 00:39:47,560 --> 00:39:51,200 Speaker 3: United States in Haiti. And it comes as a pretty 768 00:39:51,239 --> 00:39:55,440 Speaker 3: important time in Africa for the United States. They just 769 00:39:55,560 --> 00:39:59,480 Speaker 3: gave them what the first Sub Saharan African country, Biden did. 770 00:40:00,080 --> 00:40:03,839 Speaker 3: He designated them a major non NATO ally ally right 771 00:40:03,840 --> 00:40:06,560 Speaker 3: around the same time that these negotiations over Haiti are happening. 772 00:40:07,440 --> 00:40:09,439 Speaker 1: We put that up. I think that's C five. Sorry 773 00:40:09,520 --> 00:40:11,680 Speaker 1: to jump around on you, but you can put up 774 00:40:11,719 --> 00:40:12,520 Speaker 1: C five there. 775 00:40:12,640 --> 00:40:14,680 Speaker 3: It all goes together. And that's one of. 776 00:40:14,600 --> 00:40:17,920 Speaker 1: The important things here. Yes, and so William Rutau. One 777 00:40:17,920 --> 00:40:19,719 Speaker 1: of the things that one of the things that the 778 00:40:19,880 --> 00:40:25,640 Speaker 1: US dangles in front of foreign leaders in exchange for 779 00:40:25,880 --> 00:40:28,839 Speaker 1: things that they want is a trip to Washington, and 780 00:40:28,880 --> 00:40:32,040 Speaker 1: William rutto accepted that trip to Washington. He was here 781 00:40:32,600 --> 00:40:35,120 Speaker 1: very recently. One of the things that they announced was 782 00:40:35,120 --> 00:40:37,320 Speaker 1: that you know they're gonna name Kenya is this major 783 00:40:38,200 --> 00:40:41,759 Speaker 1: non NATO ally all. You know, they were now some 784 00:40:41,840 --> 00:40:44,600 Speaker 1: debt forgiveness and some other some other schemes that are 785 00:40:44,600 --> 00:40:53,640 Speaker 1: supposed to make Kenyon leaders happy. Coincidentally, William Rutteau is 786 00:40:53,680 --> 00:40:56,280 Speaker 1: one of the first people, if not the first people 787 00:40:56,360 --> 00:41:00,440 Speaker 1: ever charged by the International Criminal Court were for war 788 00:41:00,520 --> 00:41:05,279 Speaker 1: crimes for a slaughter that he was allegedly heavily involved in. 789 00:41:05,680 --> 00:41:08,960 Speaker 1: They eventually dropped those charges and now he's now he's 790 00:41:09,000 --> 00:41:13,960 Speaker 1: president of Kenya. The Kenya has also been doing all 791 00:41:14,000 --> 00:41:17,440 Speaker 1: sorts of pro very weird, pro us stuff, weird in 792 00:41:17,440 --> 00:41:20,160 Speaker 1: the sense that it doesn't fit with kind of what 793 00:41:20,200 --> 00:41:22,959 Speaker 1: the politics of the region might indicate. They're the only 794 00:41:23,360 --> 00:41:27,680 Speaker 1: country there that joined our kind of anti Huti coalition. 795 00:41:28,480 --> 00:41:30,919 Speaker 1: And you'll often see if you look at that giant 796 00:41:31,080 --> 00:41:34,640 Speaker 1: UN billboard, when let's say there's an Israel Palestine vote, 797 00:41:34,680 --> 00:41:36,839 Speaker 1: in the entire world is voting one way and there's 798 00:41:36,880 --> 00:41:40,080 Speaker 1: like countries you've never heard of that are like Pacific 799 00:41:40,120 --> 00:41:43,840 Speaker 1: Islands and the US are voting the other way. Kenya 800 00:41:43,880 --> 00:41:45,680 Speaker 1: will be there with them too. Yeah, like what that's 801 00:41:45,680 --> 00:41:47,840 Speaker 1: going on here with Kenya? You can also if you 802 00:41:47,880 --> 00:41:49,560 Speaker 1: want to go down a rabbit hole, go check out 803 00:41:50,080 --> 00:41:55,080 Speaker 1: Kenya's election in which Ruto won in a very very 804 00:41:55,120 --> 00:42:00,160 Speaker 1: scandal plagued election by like zero point one percent or something, 805 00:42:00,320 --> 00:42:04,879 Speaker 1: with all sorts of anomalies and all sorts of allegations 806 00:42:04,880 --> 00:42:07,279 Speaker 1: that that it was rigged and that the that the 807 00:42:07,400 --> 00:42:11,520 Speaker 1: US is preferred candidate Rutto came out on top despite 808 00:42:11,600 --> 00:42:16,040 Speaker 1: not having actual actual majority support. And then fast forward, 809 00:42:16,680 --> 00:42:20,480 Speaker 1: US wants international troops to go into Haiti. The US 810 00:42:20,560 --> 00:42:23,040 Speaker 1: feels like, okay, we can't. We've sent in the Marines 811 00:42:23,160 --> 00:42:24,560 Speaker 1: too many times into Haiti. 812 00:42:25,600 --> 00:42:27,600 Speaker 3: And who we've sent the UN too many times in 813 00:42:27,640 --> 00:42:29,680 Speaker 3: the Haiti right, and what's and what's it? 814 00:42:29,800 --> 00:42:32,200 Speaker 1: Almost it feels racist. It's like, well, we need some 815 00:42:32,239 --> 00:42:36,480 Speaker 1: African troops to like do this invasion for us. You 816 00:42:36,520 --> 00:42:38,920 Speaker 1: know who can help us out? Oh, we've been doing 817 00:42:38,920 --> 00:42:40,680 Speaker 1: a lot of favors for Kenya. Can you will do this? 818 00:42:40,840 --> 00:42:45,040 Speaker 1: It's very unpopular in Kenya. This, this this invasion is 819 00:42:45,080 --> 00:42:48,560 Speaker 1: extremely unpopular. They had to pay the Kenyan troops. I 820 00:42:48,600 --> 00:42:51,439 Speaker 1: think it's reported they're getting paid an extra fifteen hundred 821 00:42:51,440 --> 00:42:54,799 Speaker 1: dollars a month on top of their salaries, which is 822 00:42:55,800 --> 00:42:59,440 Speaker 1: which is only further fueling resentment in Haiti because Haitian 823 00:42:59,719 --> 00:43:02,600 Speaker 1: police officers aren't even getting paid right, Like they haven't 824 00:43:02,640 --> 00:43:06,359 Speaker 1: been paid in months at best, and they're like, wait 825 00:43:06,400 --> 00:43:09,080 Speaker 1: a minute, but you're paying them fifteen you know, the 826 00:43:09,120 --> 00:43:12,320 Speaker 1: average you know, Haitian police officer makes it a tiny 827 00:43:12,360 --> 00:43:16,600 Speaker 1: fraction of that. And you know, there are reports that 828 00:43:16,640 --> 00:43:19,120 Speaker 1: the base that the US built for these canyons isn't 829 00:43:19,120 --> 00:43:21,960 Speaker 1: really ready yet. And then the question is what on 830 00:43:22,000 --> 00:43:24,600 Speaker 1: earth are they going to do? Like what what do 831 00:43:24,680 --> 00:43:29,080 Speaker 1: we think a couple thousand foreign police officers are going 832 00:43:29,160 --> 00:43:34,840 Speaker 1: to do in a situation that is completely out of control? 833 00:43:35,880 --> 00:43:36,120 Speaker 1: Like what? 834 00:43:36,320 --> 00:43:38,360 Speaker 4: Like what? Like it? 835 00:43:38,480 --> 00:43:43,120 Speaker 1: It literally makes no sense, like what what? What is 836 00:43:43,160 --> 00:43:44,759 Speaker 1: the goal here? Like in other words, so they set 837 00:43:44,800 --> 00:43:48,120 Speaker 1: up this presidential council in a hotel room in Jamaica. 838 00:43:49,160 --> 00:43:51,760 Speaker 1: That presidential council took a bunch of resumes. 839 00:43:51,320 --> 00:43:53,480 Speaker 3: Which is we've seen the same thing play up before. 840 00:43:53,719 --> 00:43:55,560 Speaker 1: Yeah, they say they took a bunch of resumes. They 841 00:43:55,560 --> 00:44:00,399 Speaker 1: took sixty resumes from people applying to be a black minister. Yeah, 842 00:44:01,080 --> 00:44:02,640 Speaker 1: they narrowed it down to five. They did a bunch 843 00:44:02,680 --> 00:44:05,879 Speaker 1: of interviews, uh, and then they picked a guy from 844 00:44:05,960 --> 00:44:09,799 Speaker 1: UNICEF to be the prime Minister of Haiti. That's not 845 00:44:10,400 --> 00:44:13,520 Speaker 1: a political solution that has the buy in of the 846 00:44:13,840 --> 00:44:15,000 Speaker 1: of the Haitian people. 847 00:44:14,840 --> 00:44:16,600 Speaker 3: Right, you have the buy in of the United States 848 00:44:16,640 --> 00:44:18,640 Speaker 3: and maybe US some. 849 00:44:18,680 --> 00:44:21,880 Speaker 1: Elements some elements of uh, you know, the Haitian elite, 850 00:44:21,880 --> 00:44:25,279 Speaker 1: which were you know, jockeying and lobbying and pressuring to 851 00:44:25,320 --> 00:44:28,759 Speaker 1: try to get their preferred prime minister outcome. But prime 852 00:44:28,760 --> 00:44:33,400 Speaker 1: minister of what like of a handful of Kenyan troops 853 00:44:34,040 --> 00:44:35,960 Speaker 1: or police officers, not troops. 854 00:44:36,719 --> 00:44:40,200 Speaker 3: So, and this is also in the context of I 855 00:44:40,200 --> 00:44:44,440 Speaker 3: mean some people describe it as a second scramble for Africa, 856 00:44:45,280 --> 00:44:52,440 Speaker 3: Russia and some sort of radical Islamic efforts to capture 857 00:44:52,480 --> 00:44:56,200 Speaker 3: different countries. The United States is trying to keep some 858 00:44:56,320 --> 00:44:58,360 Speaker 3: of that at Bay, is trying to maintain its power 859 00:44:58,640 --> 00:45:01,279 Speaker 3: up with China as well, and so that's where you 860 00:45:01,320 --> 00:45:05,399 Speaker 3: see Kenya becoming especially important to the United States. Kenny 861 00:45:05,560 --> 00:45:07,439 Speaker 3: is in a lot of debt. They have to pay, 862 00:45:07,600 --> 00:45:10,000 Speaker 3: like us, a lot of interest on their debt. That's 863 00:45:10,000 --> 00:45:10,640 Speaker 3: where like. 864 00:45:10,680 --> 00:45:13,840 Speaker 1: US, it can't just have the Federal Reserve handle that 865 00:45:14,040 --> 00:45:14,600 Speaker 1: right now. 866 00:45:14,800 --> 00:45:18,719 Speaker 3: And so that's where the sort of financial squeeze push 867 00:45:18,800 --> 00:45:23,160 Speaker 3: people into the streets. Let's actually roll C two because 868 00:45:23,560 --> 00:45:28,440 Speaker 3: Barack Obama's half sister was on CNN was being tear 869 00:45:28,480 --> 00:45:32,399 Speaker 3: gassed on CNN reportedly. Let's roll this footage C two. 870 00:45:32,640 --> 00:45:33,840 Speaker 4: Come speak to. 871 00:45:36,000 --> 00:45:36,800 Speaker 1: Live on CNN. 872 00:45:36,840 --> 00:45:37,760 Speaker 4: Why are you here today? 873 00:45:38,719 --> 00:45:43,000 Speaker 5: I'm here because look at what's happening. 874 00:45:43,400 --> 00:45:46,320 Speaker 3: Young Kenyans demonstrating for their rights. 875 00:45:46,480 --> 00:46:03,000 Speaker 5: They're demonstating with flags and banners. I can't even see anymore. 876 00:46:09,120 --> 00:46:11,879 Speaker 3: So that sign, if you were watching it said colonialism 877 00:46:11,960 --> 00:46:16,280 Speaker 3: never ended. One of the fellow protesters with Alma Obama 878 00:46:16,680 --> 00:46:19,520 Speaker 3: had to sign that side colonialism never ended. That was 879 00:46:19,560 --> 00:46:22,640 Speaker 3: here gas. You could hear shots in the background, so 880 00:46:22,680 --> 00:46:25,000 Speaker 3: we can put the next element up on the screen here. 881 00:46:25,400 --> 00:46:29,239 Speaker 3: That's because yeah, they were fired their protesters were being 882 00:46:29,280 --> 00:46:32,839 Speaker 3: fired on in the streets. Obviously, we mentioned earlier that 883 00:46:33,200 --> 00:46:35,960 Speaker 3: part of the Parliament went up on went up in 884 00:46:36,280 --> 00:46:41,759 Speaker 3: flames yesterday as well. This is from the Associated Press quote. 885 00:46:41,760 --> 00:46:43,880 Speaker 3: The Finance bill was meant to raise or introduce taxes 886 00:46:43,920 --> 00:46:45,920 Speaker 3: or fees on a range of daily items and services, 887 00:46:45,960 --> 00:46:49,080 Speaker 3: including internet data, fuel, bank transfers, in diapers. Some measures 888 00:46:49,120 --> 00:46:51,719 Speaker 3: were stripped as Anchor grew, and it's all part of 889 00:46:51,719 --> 00:46:54,280 Speaker 3: the Kenyan government's efforts to raise an extra two point 890 00:46:54,440 --> 00:47:01,239 Speaker 3: seven billion dollars in domestic revenue. Obviously, then sending well 891 00:47:01,280 --> 00:47:05,839 Speaker 3: paid troops to Haiti not going to be popular either, 892 00:47:06,000 --> 00:47:08,680 Speaker 3: I'm assuming, and actually I think the US did pay 893 00:47:09,640 --> 00:47:11,960 Speaker 3: for that operation. 894 00:47:12,120 --> 00:47:14,319 Speaker 1: Yeah, yes, the US is paying for it in lots 895 00:47:14,320 --> 00:47:19,200 Speaker 1: of different ways, right, yes. And meanwhile some people watching 896 00:47:19,200 --> 00:47:20,360 Speaker 1: them and say, well, what do you want to do 897 00:47:20,400 --> 00:47:24,359 Speaker 1: in Haiti? Well, a not that like, that's not that's 898 00:47:24,480 --> 00:47:27,640 Speaker 1: not like just because you don't have any other ideas, 899 00:47:27,680 --> 00:47:31,640 Speaker 1: it's not an argument for sending an international like invasionary 900 00:47:31,680 --> 00:47:36,320 Speaker 1: force into try to occupy Haiti. Like, there are Haitian 901 00:47:36,360 --> 00:47:40,000 Speaker 1: political elements that are trying to work toward some type 902 00:47:40,000 --> 00:47:43,560 Speaker 1: of solution and if the kind of United Nations want 903 00:47:43,600 --> 00:47:48,200 Speaker 1: to support that, they can do that with support for uh, 904 00:47:48,400 --> 00:47:52,040 Speaker 1: you know, Haitian farmers, Haitian Haitian merchants, Haitian Haitian businesses, 905 00:47:52,040 --> 00:47:57,200 Speaker 1: Haitian organizations that are trying to come together and you 906 00:47:57,239 --> 00:48:00,200 Speaker 1: can help import the things that they that they need 907 00:48:00,239 --> 00:48:02,960 Speaker 1: to get off the ground. But just coming in with 908 00:48:03,000 --> 00:48:06,800 Speaker 1: more guns and putting Kenyan troops in a base is 909 00:48:07,200 --> 00:48:11,440 Speaker 1: only it's kind of suppressing whatever kind of whatever political 910 00:48:11,480 --> 00:48:16,520 Speaker 1: reckoning and political dialogue needs to happen to eventually get somewhere. 911 00:48:17,760 --> 00:48:21,080 Speaker 1: You've tried, We've been trying, they've been Yeah, we have 912 00:48:21,120 --> 00:48:25,240 Speaker 1: been trying to impose some type of situation on Haiti 913 00:48:25,280 --> 00:48:26,040 Speaker 1: for two hundred years. 914 00:48:26,040 --> 00:48:28,720 Speaker 3: Well, with similar methods too, very similar methods. 915 00:48:28,760 --> 00:48:31,319 Speaker 1: You know, we just dress them up differently, and troops 916 00:48:31,400 --> 00:48:33,799 Speaker 1: from different countries different times, but the same thing. Yeah, 917 00:48:36,520 --> 00:48:38,520 Speaker 1: all right. You might remember that back in early May, 918 00:48:38,560 --> 00:48:41,440 Speaker 1: we reported here and at the Intercept that APAK, the 919 00:48:41,520 --> 00:48:45,280 Speaker 1: lobby group that describes itself as pro Israel, was secretly 920 00:48:45,320 --> 00:48:49,359 Speaker 1: intervening in a congressional primary in Portland, Oregon, in order 921 00:48:49,400 --> 00:48:53,760 Speaker 1: to block the sister of Promila Giapaul names Sushila Giapaul, 922 00:48:53,840 --> 00:48:56,360 Speaker 1: from winning an open primary. Now I reported that a 923 00:48:56,560 --> 00:48:59,279 Speaker 1: PAK was routing its money through a super pack that 924 00:48:59,360 --> 00:49:03,320 Speaker 1: claims to have a pro science mission called three fourteen Action, 925 00:49:03,800 --> 00:49:06,480 Speaker 1: and that it also appeared APAC was funneling money through 926 00:49:06,520 --> 00:49:11,640 Speaker 1: a different pack called Voters for Responsive Government. APAC's allies 927 00:49:11,800 --> 00:49:16,160 Speaker 1: furiously denied the reporting, arguing it played into antisemitic tropes. 928 00:49:16,760 --> 00:49:21,120 Speaker 1: Yet about a week later, Jiapaul's opponent, Maxine Dexter, was 929 00:49:21,160 --> 00:49:24,240 Speaker 1: forced to disclose some of her last minute surgeon funding, 930 00:49:24,440 --> 00:49:26,600 Speaker 1: and it turned out it was coming from donors who 931 00:49:26,640 --> 00:49:29,759 Speaker 1: regularly gave to APAC. One of the donors who had 932 00:49:29,800 --> 00:49:32,160 Speaker 1: maxed out to Dexter even told me she wasn't aware 933 00:49:32,160 --> 00:49:35,400 Speaker 1: of the contribution, but that she green lights whatever APAC 934 00:49:35,560 --> 00:49:38,279 Speaker 1: asks her to do. She told me, quote, I give 935 00:49:38,320 --> 00:49:42,960 Speaker 1: all my contributions through APAC. Still, they refused to disclose 936 00:49:43,000 --> 00:49:46,440 Speaker 1: their super pac spending down the stretch, and three fourteen 937 00:49:46,520 --> 00:49:49,600 Speaker 1: Action even brazenly lied about the source of the money. 938 00:49:49,920 --> 00:49:52,080 Speaker 1: And when I say that they lied, I mean they 939 00:49:52,120 --> 00:49:56,080 Speaker 1: straight up, baldfaced lied. The super PACs were relying on 940 00:49:56,120 --> 00:50:00,360 Speaker 1: a campaign rule that treats them differently than candidates. Candidates 941 00:50:00,440 --> 00:50:03,000 Speaker 1: have to disclose every forty eight hours down the stretch 942 00:50:03,040 --> 00:50:05,360 Speaker 1: of the campaign, so nobody can sneak in new money, 943 00:50:05,920 --> 00:50:09,200 Speaker 1: but super PACs only have to disclose their previous month's 944 00:50:09,239 --> 00:50:13,040 Speaker 1: funding on the twentieth day of the next month. The 945 00:50:13,080 --> 00:50:16,880 Speaker 1: election was scheduled for May twenty first, and on May twentieth, 946 00:50:17,239 --> 00:50:20,200 Speaker 1: super PACs would have had to declare all of their 947 00:50:20,200 --> 00:50:24,480 Speaker 1: fundraising from April. On May twentieth. Now, Voters for Responsive 948 00:50:24,520 --> 00:50:27,880 Speaker 1: Government filed a report that claimed it had not raised 949 00:50:28,080 --> 00:50:31,799 Speaker 1: or spent a single penny in April, yet they had 950 00:50:31,880 --> 00:50:35,960 Speaker 1: ads out to the market by May second. In other words, 951 00:50:36,320 --> 00:50:41,000 Speaker 1: their claiming they raised money, hired contractors, produced ads, set 952 00:50:41,040 --> 00:50:44,080 Speaker 1: up bank accounts, and placed the media by all in 953 00:50:44,160 --> 00:50:47,280 Speaker 1: twenty four hours, with none of that work happening in April. 954 00:50:47,560 --> 00:50:51,160 Speaker 1: Of course, that's basically impossible. But the reason they needed 955 00:50:51,160 --> 00:50:53,560 Speaker 1: to make that claim on their paperwork was so that 956 00:50:53,600 --> 00:50:56,680 Speaker 1: they could then delay disclosure of everything all the way 957 00:50:56,800 --> 00:51:01,280 Speaker 1: until June twentieth, a month after the election. Three fourteen 958 00:51:01,320 --> 00:51:04,680 Speaker 1: Action also pushed a ton of their action into their 959 00:51:04,719 --> 00:51:08,640 Speaker 1: May paperwork, So on May twentieth, that's the day before 960 00:51:08,680 --> 00:51:12,480 Speaker 1: the election, they only disclosed three donors. One of them 961 00:51:12,520 --> 00:51:14,440 Speaker 1: was an APAC guy who gave them three hundred and 962 00:51:14,440 --> 00:51:17,560 Speaker 1: fifty thousand dollars, another was Michael Bloomberg, and another was 963 00:51:17,640 --> 00:51:21,120 Speaker 1: unrelated to the race. Now, I've been covering politics for 964 00:51:21,160 --> 00:51:23,440 Speaker 1: about twenty years or so, and I have seen my 965 00:51:23,560 --> 00:51:27,640 Speaker 1: share of dishonesty, but what came next reminded me I 966 00:51:27,760 --> 00:51:31,600 Speaker 1: still know how to be shocked. Eric Poliak, the managing 967 00:51:31,600 --> 00:51:35,560 Speaker 1: director of three fourteen Action, took to Twitter on May twentieth, 968 00:51:35,719 --> 00:51:39,400 Speaker 1: after they released their donors to taunt me, saying, quote 969 00:51:39,800 --> 00:51:44,279 Speaker 1: waiting on Ryan Grimm to issue a retraction. What's so 970 00:51:44,400 --> 00:51:47,200 Speaker 1: stunning about this denial is that when Eric made it 971 00:51:47,280 --> 00:51:51,160 Speaker 1: on May twentieth, he knew that on May first, three 972 00:51:51,320 --> 00:51:55,240 Speaker 1: fourteen Action had cashed a million dollar check from United 973 00:51:55,280 --> 00:51:59,879 Speaker 1: Democracy Project APAX Superpack. And he knew that a month later, 974 00:52:00,080 --> 00:52:03,880 Speaker 1: on June twentieth, that fact would become public. Yet he 975 00:52:03,960 --> 00:52:07,560 Speaker 1: decided to knowingly lie to the public. Anyway. Here it 976 00:52:07,640 --> 00:52:11,040 Speaker 1: is in three fourteen Actions June twentieth filing. So that's 977 00:52:11,080 --> 00:52:13,880 Speaker 1: a lot of zero's on the small screen there, but 978 00:52:13,960 --> 00:52:16,399 Speaker 1: I can count them for you. There's six of them. 979 00:52:16,400 --> 00:52:20,160 Speaker 1: That's a million dollars. In other words, Pollyok knew his 980 00:52:20,320 --> 00:52:24,000 Speaker 1: organization was spending a million dollars of APAX money on 981 00:52:24,120 --> 00:52:27,239 Speaker 1: top of lots more from APAC directed donors, Yet he 982 00:52:27,320 --> 00:52:30,680 Speaker 1: said exactly the opposite the day before the election. Now, 983 00:52:30,719 --> 00:52:33,440 Speaker 1: on May second, a few days before my article initially 984 00:52:33,440 --> 00:52:36,800 Speaker 1: confirmed apax's role in the race. Giapaul and her opponent, 985 00:52:36,920 --> 00:52:40,600 Speaker 1: Eddie Morales held a rare joint press conference raising questions 986 00:52:40,840 --> 00:52:42,919 Speaker 1: about the source of the new money in the race. 987 00:52:43,560 --> 00:52:47,680 Speaker 1: Poliak took to Twitter to mock them. He wrote, after 988 00:52:47,760 --> 00:52:51,719 Speaker 1: Soushila Giapaul and Eddie Morales veep style press conference where 989 00:52:51,719 --> 00:52:55,480 Speaker 1: they offered zero evidence to back the ridiculous claims, It's 990 00:52:55,560 --> 00:52:58,240 Speaker 1: clear they're down in the polls and desperate to smear 991 00:52:58,280 --> 00:53:03,680 Speaker 1: our grassroots movement fueled by millions of contributions. So consider 992 00:53:03,719 --> 00:53:07,560 Speaker 1: the audacity there. He claimed to be leading a grassroots 993 00:53:07,800 --> 00:53:12,879 Speaker 1: movement fueled by millions of contributions. The day after they 994 00:53:12,920 --> 00:53:17,080 Speaker 1: deposited that million dollar check, when Voters for Responsive Government 995 00:53:17,160 --> 00:53:20,319 Speaker 1: disclosed its donors, we learned that APAC had cut them 996 00:53:20,360 --> 00:53:23,480 Speaker 1: a one point three million dollar check, and eight other 997 00:53:23,600 --> 00:53:26,880 Speaker 1: APAC linked donors had kicked in two point six million 998 00:53:26,920 --> 00:53:31,040 Speaker 1: dollars more. According to the paperwork they filed, they managed 999 00:53:31,080 --> 00:53:36,279 Speaker 1: to raise all that money in a single day. Emily, 1000 00:53:36,320 --> 00:53:38,640 Speaker 1: I don't know if you've ever done any fundraising, but 1001 00:53:40,239 --> 00:53:43,240 Speaker 1: calling that many people in a single day, just getting 1002 00:53:43,239 --> 00:53:45,880 Speaker 1: them on the phone is going to be hard. All 1003 00:53:45,920 --> 00:53:48,640 Speaker 1: the zeros there, God, that's a lot just typing in those. 1004 00:53:49,160 --> 00:53:50,640 Speaker 1: This is going to take you more than twenty. 1005 00:53:50,440 --> 00:53:52,160 Speaker 3: Four hours, so much work for the FEC. 1006 00:53:53,440 --> 00:53:56,640 Speaker 1: So yeah, what they are banking on is that the 1007 00:53:56,719 --> 00:53:59,320 Speaker 1: FEC will look at this and be like, all right, whatever, right, 1008 00:53:59,400 --> 00:54:02,000 Speaker 1: who cares that we don't have enough commissioners. 1009 00:54:02,000 --> 00:54:02,239 Speaker 4: We don't. 1010 00:54:02,239 --> 00:54:05,680 Speaker 1: I'm a staff. We don't basically enforce laws around here. 1011 00:54:06,360 --> 00:54:09,520 Speaker 1: But even if they had disclosed on May twentieth, that's 1012 00:54:09,560 --> 00:54:13,680 Speaker 1: still was too late because there's mail in voting. Eighty 1013 00:54:13,760 --> 00:54:16,080 Speaker 1: percent of the people had already voted at that point. 1014 00:54:16,440 --> 00:54:18,520 Speaker 1: That was just to kind of twist the knife, to 1015 00:54:18,600 --> 00:54:21,000 Speaker 1: just keep it so that you didn't even have twenty 1016 00:54:21,000 --> 00:54:22,759 Speaker 1: four hours to know who was funding that race. 1017 00:54:22,880 --> 00:54:25,359 Speaker 3: Isn't it just just lost? Just to be clear, right, Yeah, 1018 00:54:25,360 --> 00:54:27,040 Speaker 3: she lost? And isn't it just a fine if you're 1019 00:54:27,080 --> 00:54:28,120 Speaker 3: non compliant with FEC. 1020 00:54:28,040 --> 00:54:29,560 Speaker 1: Doesn't Yeah, And they might not even get a fine 1021 00:54:29,560 --> 00:54:31,000 Speaker 1: if the FEC doesn't bother with it. 1022 00:54:31,120 --> 00:54:33,600 Speaker 3: And even let's say the FEC does bother with it'd 1023 00:54:33,600 --> 00:54:36,320 Speaker 3: be fine. It's sort of like when you know a 1024 00:54:36,480 --> 00:54:39,759 Speaker 3: exonmobile gets a fine. It's just the cost of doing 1025 00:54:39,760 --> 00:54:41,080 Speaker 3: business when you have enough fun. 1026 00:54:41,239 --> 00:54:43,560 Speaker 1: They spent four million dollars in a couple of weeks. Yeah, 1027 00:54:43,600 --> 00:54:45,200 Speaker 1: they can afford a little fine. 1028 00:54:45,840 --> 00:54:49,919 Speaker 3: This is totally unrelated. But Leifang, your old Colleageluefan Feng 1029 00:54:50,000 --> 00:54:52,080 Speaker 3: had a great story he ran in The Guardian this 1030 00:54:52,120 --> 00:54:57,239 Speaker 3: week about basically these pro Israel groups that had been 1031 00:54:57,280 --> 00:55:00,839 Speaker 3: lobbying on behalf of Israeli government appro says nobody had 1032 00:55:00,880 --> 00:55:05,200 Speaker 3: registered for Pharah And again, like it's the same thing 1033 00:55:05,600 --> 00:55:08,880 Speaker 3: that the cost of compliance sometimes or the cost of 1034 00:55:08,920 --> 00:55:12,480 Speaker 3: non compliance is just worth the non compliance. It's just 1035 00:55:12,640 --> 00:55:14,000 Speaker 3: worth what whatever. 1036 00:55:13,719 --> 00:55:15,560 Speaker 1: You get out, it's going to be prosecuted. 1037 00:55:15,640 --> 00:55:18,680 Speaker 3: Yeah, and when there's a timeline, there's like an actual 1038 00:55:18,680 --> 00:55:21,919 Speaker 3: election that you can squeeze this past. I mean, it's 1039 00:55:22,000 --> 00:55:27,360 Speaker 3: just this should especially given the APAC spending patterns, this 1040 00:55:27,400 --> 00:55:30,240 Speaker 3: should get people pause for the next couple of years 1041 00:55:30,400 --> 00:55:33,120 Speaker 3: about what's happening in some of these races around the country. 1042 00:55:33,120 --> 00:55:36,080 Speaker 3: And obviously you're eagle eyed and keeping you know, your 1043 00:55:36,120 --> 00:55:39,720 Speaker 3: own reporting focused on this, but uh, you know, it's 1044 00:55:39,760 --> 00:55:42,320 Speaker 3: it's got to get into local papers. Local reporters have 1045 00:55:42,360 --> 00:55:44,640 Speaker 3: to pay attention to this stuff. For the purpose of ads. 1046 00:55:44,680 --> 00:55:48,680 Speaker 3: People should be paying attention to this stuff that's really dirty. 1047 00:55:48,719 --> 00:55:51,040 Speaker 1: And I talked to some local reporters who were trying 1048 00:55:51,040 --> 00:55:53,239 Speaker 1: to report it out right at the time, but and 1049 00:55:53,480 --> 00:55:55,719 Speaker 1: they and they wrote a couple okay stories where they 1050 00:55:55,719 --> 00:56:00,560 Speaker 1: would say, like this looks softully fishy, but they didn't 1051 00:56:00,560 --> 00:56:03,600 Speaker 1: have the sourcing to be able to just confirm that. 1052 00:56:03,640 --> 00:56:05,080 Speaker 1: They didn't have a source that I had that said like, 1053 00:56:05,120 --> 00:56:07,640 Speaker 1: oh yeah, this is actually this is definitely a pack, right, 1054 00:56:08,800 --> 00:56:14,600 Speaker 1: And so it makes it very tough for and especially 1055 00:56:14,760 --> 00:56:17,480 Speaker 1: you know, journalists that don't want to get accused of 1056 00:56:17,520 --> 00:56:20,560 Speaker 1: like trafficking and anti Semitic tropes, because you can't just 1057 00:56:20,640 --> 00:56:26,120 Speaker 1: go around just recklessly like suggesting without evidence that APAC 1058 00:56:26,239 --> 00:56:28,920 Speaker 1: is funding a particular superpack. If you have the evidence, 1059 00:56:28,920 --> 00:56:31,239 Speaker 1: you can say it. And they couldn't quite prove it 1060 00:56:31,280 --> 00:56:34,480 Speaker 1: because APAC had done a good enough job of keeping 1061 00:56:34,520 --> 00:56:38,560 Speaker 1: its keeping its fingerprints off of the money until afterwards. 1062 00:56:38,960 --> 00:56:42,560 Speaker 1: Like and it's very smart in a way because it 1063 00:56:42,640 --> 00:56:45,359 Speaker 1: like makes you sound crazy when you're saying it in 1064 00:56:45,400 --> 00:56:48,920 Speaker 1: real time, like you sound like a conspiracy theorist or 1065 00:56:48,920 --> 00:56:52,759 Speaker 1: a lunatic, but then afterwards like, oh yeah, that was us, 1066 00:56:53,040 --> 00:56:56,400 Speaker 1: And after the polls closed, APAC was like this shows 1067 00:56:56,960 --> 00:57:01,319 Speaker 1: that being pro Israel is good politics. Mm hmm. It's like, well, 1068 00:57:01,400 --> 00:57:05,200 Speaker 1: if that's true, why didn't you why do you endorse 1069 00:57:05,239 --> 00:57:08,640 Speaker 1: her publicly? Why did you deny that this was happening? 1070 00:57:08,920 --> 00:57:10,960 Speaker 1: Like why did you? Why would you have to stress 1071 00:57:11,120 --> 00:57:12,719 Speaker 1: so much, why you have to spend so much, and 1072 00:57:12,719 --> 00:57:14,560 Speaker 1: why do you have to go to such extreme lengths 1073 00:57:14,760 --> 00:57:17,320 Speaker 1: to conceal the role of a pro Israel organization in 1074 00:57:17,360 --> 00:57:17,800 Speaker 1: this race? 1075 00:57:17,920 --> 00:57:18,120 Speaker 4: Yep? 1076 00:57:18,560 --> 00:57:21,520 Speaker 1: Like that that doesn't like, you can't you can't have 1077 00:57:21,560 --> 00:57:25,320 Speaker 1: it both ways. You can't say that your involvement is 1078 00:57:26,040 --> 00:57:28,520 Speaker 1: shows that being you know, pro a pack is is 1079 00:57:28,560 --> 00:57:31,120 Speaker 1: good politics at the same time that you're hiding the 1080 00:57:31,120 --> 00:57:32,720 Speaker 1: fact that a Pack was even involved. 1081 00:57:32,840 --> 00:57:37,120 Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, I mean great reporting, crazy stuff, dirty stuff. 1082 00:57:36,920 --> 00:57:41,560 Speaker 1: Yeah, it's crazy. And what Democrats have realized is that 1083 00:57:42,240 --> 00:57:45,640 Speaker 1: the vulnerability for other Democrats here is not that it's 1084 00:57:45,680 --> 00:57:47,720 Speaker 1: a PAC money. It's not that it's pro Israel money. 1085 00:57:47,960 --> 00:57:51,840 Speaker 1: There was polling done in the district where most voters 1086 00:57:51,840 --> 00:57:55,160 Speaker 1: in Portland had actualely no idea who Apack even was right, 1087 00:57:55,240 --> 00:57:58,040 Speaker 1: because we think everybody knows who Apack is, because this 1088 00:57:58,080 --> 00:58:01,680 Speaker 1: is something we've covered closely. Everybody knows that. Okay, I 1089 00:58:01,760 --> 00:58:04,640 Speaker 1: do you always have to remind yourself that we are 1090 00:58:04,920 --> 00:58:08,800 Speaker 1: weirdos like unusual that we follow politics this closely. Most 1091 00:58:08,880 --> 00:58:12,040 Speaker 1: voters like what's apack? Never heard of APEC absolutely. What 1092 00:58:12,240 --> 00:58:18,160 Speaker 1: Democratic voters don't like, however, is Republican rich people spending 1093 00:58:18,200 --> 00:58:20,920 Speaker 1: money in Democratic primaries. And if you go through, if 1094 00:58:20,920 --> 00:58:23,320 Speaker 1: you scroll back and look at that list of the 1095 00:58:23,360 --> 00:58:25,640 Speaker 1: eight people that gave, for instance, I think you'll find 1096 00:58:25,640 --> 00:58:28,040 Speaker 1: all of those are like Republican donors, like and not 1097 00:58:28,160 --> 00:58:31,120 Speaker 1: just like we give to both, but like mostly Republican donors, 1098 00:58:31,120 --> 00:58:35,800 Speaker 1: a lot of Trump donors, and that drives Democratic primary 1099 00:58:35,880 --> 00:58:38,960 Speaker 1: voters crazy. Summerlee was able to use that to her 1100 00:58:38,960 --> 00:58:42,080 Speaker 1: advantage in the Pittsburgh race. Others have been able to 1101 00:58:42,120 --> 00:58:46,640 Speaker 1: use that to their advantage. But by hiding the donors 1102 00:58:46,680 --> 00:58:50,240 Speaker 1: until after the election, you strip Democrats of the ability 1103 00:58:50,280 --> 00:58:53,480 Speaker 1: to say this is actually Republican money, because you don't. 1104 00:58:53,760 --> 00:58:55,920 Speaker 1: You could say it's Apack money if you can, if 1105 00:58:55,960 --> 00:58:58,360 Speaker 1: you can report that you have some evidence, but without 1106 00:58:58,360 --> 00:59:00,600 Speaker 1: knowing who the specific donors are, you can't necessarily say 1107 00:59:00,640 --> 00:59:04,360 Speaker 1: it's Republican money. Even though most APAC money is Republican money. 1108 00:59:04,480 --> 00:59:09,040 Speaker 3: Right, is just dirty, It's dirty, dirty stuff. 1109 00:59:09,000 --> 00:59:14,120 Speaker 1: Right, and look, if APAC wants to spend seventeen million 1110 00:59:14,160 --> 00:59:17,560 Speaker 1: dollars in Jamal Bowman's race, you know, right, have at it, 1111 00:59:17,720 --> 00:59:19,640 Speaker 1: right and at least in that race, they did it, 1112 00:59:20,280 --> 00:59:23,520 Speaker 1: you know, with their chest. That's so true. 1113 00:59:23,960 --> 00:59:26,840 Speaker 3: And they got backlash or they're starting to get backlash 1114 00:59:26,880 --> 00:59:29,000 Speaker 3: based on those leaks to well leaks, those off the 1115 00:59:29,040 --> 00:59:31,280 Speaker 3: record comments to Access this morning. I don't know how 1116 00:59:31,320 --> 00:59:35,080 Speaker 3: much of that you've heard from even relatively pro Israel 1117 00:59:35,160 --> 00:59:39,160 Speaker 3: Democrats who just are getting very uncomfortable with APAX tactics. 1118 00:59:39,520 --> 00:59:42,880 Speaker 3: This story should be another part of that. 1119 00:59:42,920 --> 00:59:46,640 Speaker 1: What, yes, it should be. And but we'll see. Because 1120 00:59:47,400 --> 00:59:51,640 Speaker 1: from from the Democratic leadership's perspective, I think as long 1121 00:59:51,680 --> 00:59:56,200 Speaker 1: as APAK you know, sticks with its mission of being 1122 00:59:56,240 --> 01:00:00,880 Speaker 1: pro Israel and does not carry the agenda of their donors, 1123 01:00:01,280 --> 01:00:03,920 Speaker 1: their further agenda of the donors, which which is, you know, 1124 01:00:03,960 --> 01:00:07,000 Speaker 1: a Republican agenda, because there's a republican's as long as 1125 01:00:07,000 --> 01:00:09,360 Speaker 1: they stick with pros your agenda and as long as 1126 01:00:09,360 --> 01:00:12,800 Speaker 1: they only go after progressives in primaries, then I think 1127 01:00:12,960 --> 01:00:15,440 Speaker 1: Democratic leadership sees that as a win win. Yeah, probably, 1128 01:00:15,680 --> 01:00:18,440 Speaker 1: like that's fine. Actually, probably you're gonna you're gonna discipline 1129 01:00:18,480 --> 01:00:20,640 Speaker 1: our left flank. Ye works for us. 1130 01:00:20,680 --> 01:00:21,400 Speaker 3: Yeah sounds great. 1131 01:00:22,000 --> 01:00:25,400 Speaker 1: But you know, any time that you make a deal 1132 01:00:25,640 --> 01:00:29,880 Speaker 1: with people who are not your allies, and these Republican 1133 01:00:29,880 --> 01:00:36,000 Speaker 1: donors are quite literally your adversary political adversaries, you're taking 1134 01:00:36,000 --> 01:00:39,400 Speaker 1: a huge gamble. And so the question is is the 1135 01:00:39,880 --> 01:00:42,160 Speaker 1: is this kind of enemy of my enemy is my 1136 01:00:42,240 --> 01:00:44,880 Speaker 1: friend situation really that clever or are you going to 1137 01:00:44,920 --> 01:00:48,000 Speaker 1: wind up you know, getting eaten by it? 1138 01:00:48,080 --> 01:00:51,520 Speaker 3: Else becomes a crutch, you know, when that money drives up, 1139 01:00:51,560 --> 01:00:53,760 Speaker 3: If the money drives up in ten years or whatever, 1140 01:00:54,400 --> 01:00:56,600 Speaker 3: you are just left up without a huge funding. 1141 01:00:57,040 --> 01:01:00,880 Speaker 1: It also suppresses what you're kind of organic aalition believes 1142 01:01:00,920 --> 01:01:04,880 Speaker 1: about a major political issue. Yeah, absolutely, and distances you 1143 01:01:05,000 --> 01:01:06,720 Speaker 1: further from your voters. 1144 01:01:06,920 --> 01:01:10,000 Speaker 3: Yeah, yeah, absolutely. It happened with a lot of the 1145 01:01:10,040 --> 01:01:13,160 Speaker 3: libertarian spending, coke spending for Republicans over the years, sort 1146 01:01:13,160 --> 01:01:17,400 Speaker 3: of lost touch with the support for social safety net 1147 01:01:17,400 --> 01:01:17,880 Speaker 3: among them. 1148 01:01:18,320 --> 01:01:20,760 Speaker 1: That very interesting, and then look what they got Trump? 1149 01:01:20,960 --> 01:01:24,800 Speaker 3: Yep, So who will be democrats? 1150 01:01:24,880 --> 01:01:27,360 Speaker 1: Trump? There you go. I think we might find out. 1151 01:01:27,360 --> 01:01:28,560 Speaker 1: We'll stick around long enough. 1152 01:01:28,440 --> 01:01:32,160 Speaker 3: We'll find out if we don't end up in a 1153 01:01:32,240 --> 01:01:32,880 Speaker 3: nuclear war. 1154 01:01:32,960 --> 01:01:34,760 Speaker 1: That's right, We're going to find out if we're going 1155 01:01:34,800 --> 01:01:38,720 Speaker 1: to next with a doctor Theodore Postal, one of the 1156 01:01:38,840 --> 01:01:43,600 Speaker 1: leading nuclear armament experts in the world stick around for that. 1157 01:01:46,480 --> 01:01:50,560 Speaker 1: Joining us now is Professor emeritus from MIT. Theodore Postal 1158 01:01:51,360 --> 01:01:52,840 Speaker 1: ted thanks so much for joining us. 1159 01:01:53,240 --> 01:01:54,760 Speaker 4: It's my great pleasures. Thank you. 1160 01:01:55,400 --> 01:01:58,080 Speaker 1: And so to set up this conversation, can you give 1161 01:01:58,160 --> 01:02:01,280 Speaker 1: us a kind of quick run through of of your 1162 01:02:01,800 --> 01:02:03,640 Speaker 1: career how you how you wound up both at the 1163 01:02:03,640 --> 01:02:08,040 Speaker 1: Pentagon and also you know, doing your doing your academic work. 1164 01:02:09,360 --> 01:02:12,240 Speaker 4: Well through a series of accidents. I was actually doing 1165 01:02:12,320 --> 01:02:17,520 Speaker 4: basic science, and I was increasingly concerned and interested in 1166 01:02:17,680 --> 01:02:21,560 Speaker 4: the arms race. This was in the eighties when arms 1167 01:02:21,600 --> 01:02:26,960 Speaker 4: race was just completely out of control, and uh, I 1168 01:02:27,000 --> 01:02:30,280 Speaker 4: wound up through a series of accidents and and and 1169 01:02:30,280 --> 01:02:33,560 Speaker 4: a very close friend of mine named Washington going to 1170 01:02:33,680 --> 01:02:37,480 Speaker 4: the Office of Technology Assessment, where I worked on a 1171 01:02:37,480 --> 01:02:40,360 Speaker 4: study of the MX missile, which was the big game 1172 01:02:40,440 --> 01:02:45,320 Speaker 4: in town at the time, that international game. And I 1173 01:02:45,400 --> 01:02:50,400 Speaker 4: came to the attention of the US Navy because of 1174 01:02:50,440 --> 01:02:52,480 Speaker 4: some of the work I was doing with them as 1175 01:02:52,480 --> 01:02:56,560 Speaker 4: as an outside analyst, and I was offered a position 1176 01:02:56,760 --> 01:03:01,560 Speaker 4: as a science and policy advisor to the Chief of 1177 01:03:01,680 --> 01:03:04,840 Speaker 4: naval operations, and of course that was a great opportunity, 1178 01:03:04,920 --> 01:03:08,120 Speaker 4: so I took it and I wound up, you know, 1179 01:03:08,440 --> 01:03:12,320 Speaker 4: very quickly in the belly of the beast. Worked a 1180 01:03:12,320 --> 01:03:17,880 Speaker 4: few years with the chief, saw quite a lot, which 1181 01:03:17,920 --> 01:03:22,840 Speaker 4: I must say educated me to a level that maybe 1182 01:03:23,400 --> 01:03:26,880 Speaker 4: I should dave at this point, because you see a 1183 01:03:26,880 --> 01:03:30,960 Speaker 4: combination of the most capable and the most incapable and 1184 01:03:31,040 --> 01:03:34,760 Speaker 4: opportunistic people. You see the spread you know, very very 1185 01:03:34,800 --> 01:03:38,560 Speaker 4: good and very very bad people. And it gave me, 1186 01:03:39,760 --> 01:03:45,880 Speaker 4: I think, an extremely refined understanding of how these bureaucracies work. 1187 01:03:46,760 --> 01:03:51,120 Speaker 4: And of course I took the opportunity to I spent 1188 01:03:51,320 --> 01:03:58,960 Speaker 4: many nights in a cage reading classified documents to learn 1189 01:03:59,000 --> 01:04:02,240 Speaker 4: as much as I could about the weapon systems that 1190 01:04:02,800 --> 01:04:05,360 Speaker 4: you know that I'm supposed to be advising on them. 1191 01:04:05,920 --> 01:04:09,000 Speaker 4: And that gave me a baseline that I've been able 1192 01:04:09,040 --> 01:04:10,520 Speaker 4: to build on for decades. 1193 01:04:11,160 --> 01:04:14,720 Speaker 1: So it's just of accidents, Yeah, and I think baseline 1194 01:04:14,760 --> 01:04:17,120 Speaker 1: is definitely being humble there. I think one of the 1195 01:04:17,200 --> 01:04:20,680 Speaker 1: foremost experts on the on the issue we're talking about here, 1196 01:04:20,800 --> 01:04:24,000 Speaker 1: we start with kind of E E two. Here is 1197 01:04:24,000 --> 01:04:27,240 Speaker 1: the Washing Post article headline kind of concerning headline US 1198 01:04:27,320 --> 01:04:33,840 Speaker 1: concerned about Ukraine strikes on Russian nuclear radar stations. So 1199 01:04:34,080 --> 01:04:37,120 Speaker 1: walk us, walk us through why the US is concerned 1200 01:04:37,160 --> 01:04:40,080 Speaker 1: about this, and why we ought to be concerned about 1201 01:04:40,080 --> 01:04:42,680 Speaker 1: this as well, what what is what is Ukraine doing here? 1202 01:04:43,320 --> 01:04:46,840 Speaker 4: Well, the US should be concerned about this, and unfortunately, 1203 01:04:46,960 --> 01:04:49,560 Speaker 4: I think the US has to take responsibility for this 1204 01:04:49,840 --> 01:04:55,560 Speaker 4: because of these radar stations are critical to the early 1205 01:04:55,640 --> 01:05:01,280 Speaker 4: warning systems of Russia, and Russia, unlike US, does not 1206 01:05:01,520 --> 01:05:05,960 Speaker 4: have satellites in space that are capable of seeing the 1207 01:05:06,000 --> 01:05:11,480 Speaker 4: whole Earth from space. We have this kind of capability, 1208 01:05:12,240 --> 01:05:16,560 Speaker 4: So if they lose a radar, they have no way 1209 01:05:16,600 --> 01:05:20,600 Speaker 4: of knowing what's coming at them from that direction, whereas 1210 01:05:20,640 --> 01:05:24,000 Speaker 4: if we lose a radar, we just simply go to 1211 01:05:24,040 --> 01:05:26,240 Speaker 4: our satellites and look down and say, oh, yeah, we 1212 01:05:26,280 --> 01:05:30,840 Speaker 4: can see nothing is happening there. Now, given the high 1213 01:05:30,880 --> 01:05:36,040 Speaker 4: state of tension between Russia and the United States at 1214 01:05:36,040 --> 01:05:41,960 Speaker 4: this time, I think it's extraordinarily dangerous to tamper with 1215 01:05:42,200 --> 01:05:46,000 Speaker 4: anything that has anything to do with Russia's early morning 1216 01:05:46,040 --> 01:05:51,000 Speaker 4: capabilities because they are going to be more alert at 1217 01:05:51,000 --> 01:05:56,439 Speaker 4: this time because of concerns about nuclear weapon US from 1218 01:05:56,480 --> 01:06:00,520 Speaker 4: the United States now Americans tend to have the attitude 1219 01:06:00,600 --> 01:06:04,880 Speaker 4: or we would never strike them first. It's a common reaction. 1220 01:06:05,640 --> 01:06:08,880 Speaker 4: But I can assure you that they don't believe this 1221 01:06:09,080 --> 01:06:12,480 Speaker 4: about us. And in fact, if you look at American 1222 01:06:13,680 --> 01:06:16,320 Speaker 4: nuclear weapons systems and the kinds of things we are 1223 01:06:16,560 --> 01:06:20,880 Speaker 4: doing even now, it creates the appearance. I want to 1224 01:06:20,880 --> 01:06:23,439 Speaker 4: be understanding. It creates an appearance because I don't think 1225 01:06:23,520 --> 01:06:27,439 Speaker 4: people realize, you know, what the meaning of what they're 1226 01:06:27,440 --> 01:06:32,120 Speaker 4: doing is. But too a well informed technical analyst. On 1227 01:06:32,160 --> 01:06:36,000 Speaker 4: the Russian side, it looks like the United States is 1228 01:06:36,160 --> 01:06:41,919 Speaker 4: preparing to fight and win a nuclear war with Russia. Now, 1229 01:06:42,120 --> 01:06:46,040 Speaker 4: of course, fighting and winning a nuclear war is ridiculous. 1230 01:06:47,680 --> 01:06:49,880 Speaker 4: The only way you win a nuclear war is by 1231 01:06:49,920 --> 01:06:53,400 Speaker 4: a definition. The definition is ridiculous. It's like, at the 1232 01:06:53,520 --> 01:06:56,880 Speaker 4: end of this exchange, where both of our countries and 1233 01:06:57,080 --> 01:07:03,360 Speaker 4: civilization is destroyed, we have margin of larger a slightly 1234 01:07:03,480 --> 01:07:07,800 Speaker 4: larger number of nuclear weapons left in our arsenal in 1235 01:07:07,920 --> 01:07:12,280 Speaker 4: the adversary. Well, that's totally ridiculous. That's like saying, well, 1236 01:07:12,400 --> 01:07:16,000 Speaker 4: we'll have more fingernails on our body when our head 1237 01:07:16,080 --> 01:07:19,960 Speaker 4: is blown off. So fighting and winning a nuclear war 1238 01:07:20,320 --> 01:07:24,040 Speaker 4: is just absolutely this is not a matter of opinion, 1239 01:07:24,200 --> 01:07:33,120 Speaker 4: absolutely analytically ridiculous. But these kinds of doctrines have developed 1240 01:07:33,920 --> 01:07:37,240 Speaker 4: in the United States and in Russia too, because there 1241 01:07:37,280 --> 01:07:42,800 Speaker 4: was a long time where people did not fully understand 1242 01:07:42,240 --> 01:07:47,760 Speaker 4: how catastrophic large scale use of nuclear weapons would be. 1243 01:07:48,080 --> 01:07:52,360 Speaker 4: From my point of view, this is so obvious that 1244 01:07:53,600 --> 01:07:59,480 Speaker 4: you know, an infant would understand it. But unfortunately in 1245 01:07:59,720 --> 01:08:04,640 Speaker 4: in the world of military doctrine. And let me be clearer, 1246 01:08:04,640 --> 01:08:07,120 Speaker 4: I'm not talking about just the military people. I'm talking 1247 01:08:07,160 --> 01:08:13,720 Speaker 4: about civilian political scientists in the Pentagon. They invent these 1248 01:08:14,240 --> 01:08:18,559 Speaker 4: magical worlds where you can use nuclear weapons with very 1249 01:08:18,840 --> 01:08:22,639 Speaker 4: limited consequences, and the physics I want to understand, the 1250 01:08:22,680 --> 01:08:26,559 Speaker 4: physics of this shows that that's not true. Forget about 1251 01:08:26,600 --> 01:08:30,559 Speaker 4: all the other complexities, like no one would know what 1252 01:08:30,640 --> 01:08:33,960 Speaker 4: was going on if a nuclear weapon was used. Let's 1253 01:08:34,439 --> 01:08:37,679 Speaker 4: just reflect back on what happened when the World Trade 1254 01:08:37,680 --> 01:08:41,280 Speaker 4: Center was in The President had no idea what was 1255 01:08:41,320 --> 01:08:45,760 Speaker 4: going on. The US government couldn't inform it because they 1256 01:08:46,360 --> 01:08:49,120 Speaker 4: had no idea of what was going on. Now, imagine 1257 01:08:49,200 --> 01:08:54,559 Speaker 4: you have hundreds, if not thousands of events on a 1258 01:08:54,680 --> 01:08:59,040 Speaker 4: much larger scale simultaneously going on. Who is going to 1259 01:08:59,120 --> 01:09:04,160 Speaker 4: know what's happening, and of course all kinds of reactions 1260 01:09:04,479 --> 01:09:09,720 Speaker 4: and counter reactions could be happening automatically, and every simulation, 1261 01:09:10,080 --> 01:09:14,679 Speaker 4: every simulation that's worth looking at, indicates that you would 1262 01:09:14,720 --> 01:09:19,320 Speaker 4: have a rapid escalation to a general nuclear war, nuclear 1263 01:09:19,360 --> 01:09:22,360 Speaker 4: weapons start to get used. So we need to do everything, 1264 01:09:23,000 --> 01:09:27,440 Speaker 4: absolutely everything to keep our hands off the Russian systems 1265 01:09:28,200 --> 01:09:32,080 Speaker 4: because if they attack us by accident, it's going to 1266 01:09:32,080 --> 01:09:34,920 Speaker 4: be the end of everyone. So this is not like 1267 01:09:35,000 --> 01:09:37,360 Speaker 4: poking the bear to see what he's going to do. 1268 01:09:37,600 --> 01:09:39,840 Speaker 4: This is really dangerous. 1269 01:09:40,320 --> 01:09:43,479 Speaker 3: And so as you're watching all of this play out, 1270 01:09:43,520 --> 01:09:45,599 Speaker 3: and we can put the first element up on the screen, 1271 01:09:45,680 --> 01:09:51,080 Speaker 3: this is what happened in Crimea recently. This is a 1272 01:09:51,240 --> 01:09:56,280 Speaker 3: vo of obviously munitions hitting a beach in Crimea and 1273 01:09:56,360 --> 01:09:58,200 Speaker 3: control room you can go ahead and put E three 1274 01:09:58,280 --> 01:10:01,680 Speaker 3: up after that finishes playing. This is Russia blaming the 1275 01:10:01,800 --> 01:10:04,639 Speaker 3: United States for what they call the barbaric Ukrainian attack 1276 01:10:04,800 --> 01:10:09,000 Speaker 3: on Crimemea. Obviously it's been an escalation in recent days 1277 01:10:09,080 --> 01:10:12,320 Speaker 3: in this war. So, Ted, as you're watching this play out, 1278 01:10:12,840 --> 01:10:15,519 Speaker 3: how do you feel, based on all the context you 1279 01:10:15,640 --> 01:10:21,080 Speaker 3: just gave us, the administration is handling the threat of 1280 01:10:21,280 --> 01:10:25,439 Speaker 3: potential nuclear conflict. Are they. Do you feel good about 1281 01:10:25,479 --> 01:10:26,640 Speaker 3: the way the administration? 1282 01:10:27,000 --> 01:10:32,840 Speaker 4: No, I'm I'm tremendously disturbed by the way the administration 1283 01:10:33,120 --> 01:10:36,759 Speaker 4: is handling this. It's as if the administration is poking 1284 01:10:36,800 --> 01:10:42,200 Speaker 4: the Russians, trying to provoke them to do something very dangerous. Now, 1285 01:10:42,800 --> 01:10:46,200 Speaker 4: I don't want to sound like a Putent lover, but 1286 01:10:46,720 --> 01:10:51,480 Speaker 4: I have to say that looking at Putin very clear eye, 1287 01:10:51,960 --> 01:10:56,679 Speaker 4: not all this silly demonization of them, but just looking 1288 01:10:56,880 --> 01:11:01,559 Speaker 4: carefully at his history and what he does, what he 1289 01:11:01,720 --> 01:11:04,040 Speaker 4: says he's going to do, and how he follows up, 1290 01:11:04,720 --> 01:11:08,760 Speaker 4: it is very clear that mister Putin is an extremely stable, 1291 01:11:09,320 --> 01:11:15,800 Speaker 4: strategic thinker, and I do not believe he is going 1292 01:11:15,920 --> 01:11:20,280 Speaker 4: to do anything rash in responsibility. He's not going to 1293 01:11:20,280 --> 01:11:25,519 Speaker 4: be provoked. But it appears, it appears that the United 1294 01:11:25,520 --> 01:11:29,080 Speaker 4: States is trying to provoke him to do something silly. 1295 01:11:29,760 --> 01:11:35,000 Speaker 4: It's not silly, extraordinarily dangerous and leaving. And I do 1296 01:11:35,080 --> 01:11:36,840 Speaker 4: not think he will do this, but I think he 1297 01:11:36,880 --> 01:11:40,720 Speaker 4: will strike back, and it will cost American lives in 1298 01:11:40,760 --> 01:11:43,960 Speaker 4: the end. He's made it clear just the other day 1299 01:11:44,720 --> 01:11:48,599 Speaker 4: that he considers this a serious war crime. Incidentally, I 1300 01:11:48,680 --> 01:11:52,000 Speaker 4: haven't seen, it looks to me more like an accident, 1301 01:11:52,760 --> 01:11:57,960 Speaker 4: but that's another discussion. But he considers it a war crime, 1302 01:11:58,040 --> 01:12:02,280 Speaker 4: and the Russians in general are absolutely outraged. We should 1303 01:12:02,439 --> 01:12:06,719 Speaker 4: also keep in mind that the Russians believe, right or wrong, 1304 01:12:07,600 --> 01:12:13,200 Speaker 4: that this horrifying Crocus City attack in Moscow, where all 1305 01:12:13,240 --> 01:12:16,599 Speaker 4: these innocent people who are murdered by these people who 1306 01:12:16,600 --> 01:12:20,519 Speaker 4: appear to be associated with ISIS, and also according to 1307 01:12:20,560 --> 01:12:24,920 Speaker 4: the Russians, they believe that the Ukrainians were involved, in 1308 01:12:26,040 --> 01:12:31,160 Speaker 4: one way or another, supporting the ISIS attack. Given that 1309 01:12:31,200 --> 01:12:35,240 Speaker 4: the Russians have this mindset, independent of whether or not 1310 01:12:35,360 --> 01:12:38,599 Speaker 4: this is correct, they are going to be acting on it. 1311 01:12:39,439 --> 01:12:48,120 Speaker 4: And instead of doing things to reduce the belief among 1312 01:12:48,160 --> 01:12:52,280 Speaker 4: the Russians by either providing them with information intelligence or 1313 01:12:52,640 --> 01:12:57,559 Speaker 4: apologizing or making some statements that indicate we do not 1314 01:12:57,600 --> 01:13:03,599 Speaker 4: support this kind of thing, we have just stuck stuck 1315 01:13:03,640 --> 01:13:07,040 Speaker 4: our thumb in the eyes of the Russians at every opportunity, 1316 01:13:07,640 --> 01:13:11,040 Speaker 4: and this is not good diplomacy. We have this war, 1317 01:13:11,800 --> 01:13:14,640 Speaker 4: we want to win the war. Incidentally, we're not winning it. 1318 01:13:14,720 --> 01:13:18,280 Speaker 4: We are losing it catastrophically, and the American press is 1319 01:13:18,280 --> 01:13:22,320 Speaker 4: not covering this right now, The Russians could end this 1320 01:13:22,439 --> 01:13:26,240 Speaker 4: war in weeks if they chose to take the casualties. 1321 01:13:27,000 --> 01:13:30,120 Speaker 4: Right now, what they are doing is minimizing their casualties 1322 01:13:30,560 --> 01:13:34,760 Speaker 4: while they are destroying Ukrainian forces at the rate of 1323 01:13:34,920 --> 01:13:40,559 Speaker 4: nearly two thousand casualties a day. That's like for five 1324 01:13:40,680 --> 01:13:44,640 Speaker 4: thousand casualties a month. That is the strategy of the 1325 01:13:44,720 --> 01:13:47,799 Speaker 4: Russians at this time. That's why we're not seeing great 1326 01:13:47,920 --> 01:13:54,640 Speaker 4: gains in territory because their strategy is destroyed the Ukrainian 1327 01:13:54,760 --> 01:13:59,240 Speaker 4: army and then when the army is sufficiently depleted, then 1328 01:13:59,400 --> 01:14:02,880 Speaker 4: sweep in and take over everything. They have three hundred 1329 01:14:02,960 --> 01:14:08,800 Speaker 4: thousand troops, fully armed, fully trained, and fully equipped, not 1330 01:14:08,960 --> 01:14:11,880 Speaker 4: involved in the fighting at this point that they can 1331 01:14:11,920 --> 01:14:15,519 Speaker 4: call in any time they choose. The problem they have, 1332 01:14:15,880 --> 01:14:17,880 Speaker 4: or if you want to call it a problem, is 1333 01:14:17,960 --> 01:14:22,000 Speaker 4: they don't want to take the extra casualties associated with 1334 01:14:22,080 --> 01:14:26,840 Speaker 4: a big offensive action against the capable army. So the 1335 01:14:26,960 --> 01:14:31,200 Speaker 4: first part of their strategy is to destroy the capability 1336 01:14:31,240 --> 01:14:36,400 Speaker 4: of the army they're facing and then unleash the backup forces, 1337 01:14:36,439 --> 01:14:40,479 Speaker 4: the reserve forces on the remaining army. This is a 1338 01:14:40,520 --> 01:14:44,559 Speaker 4: bad situation, and the American press has not reported it accurately. 1339 01:14:44,640 --> 01:14:48,080 Speaker 4: I follow this every day. There's a lot of international 1340 01:14:48,120 --> 01:14:54,160 Speaker 4: coverage of this from organizations that every time you check 1341 01:14:55,360 --> 01:14:58,200 Speaker 4: what has had what they said, and what has actually 1342 01:14:58,280 --> 01:15:02,880 Speaker 4: been verified, they're accurate. So it's not it's clear to 1343 01:15:02,920 --> 01:15:06,599 Speaker 4: me that we have an accurate that I have. Others 1344 01:15:06,640 --> 01:15:10,280 Speaker 4: do too, have an accurate picture of the situation in Ukraine. 1345 01:15:10,439 --> 01:15:15,400 Speaker 4: We have lost already unless the Russians, you thought, I'm sorry, 1346 01:15:16,000 --> 01:15:19,559 Speaker 4: I was, unless the Russians. Well, the point the point here, 1347 01:15:19,880 --> 01:15:23,960 Speaker 4: the point here is that if we have already lost, 1348 01:15:24,920 --> 01:15:28,280 Speaker 4: why aren't we talking to the Russians to see what 1349 01:15:28,439 --> 01:15:33,519 Speaker 4: kind of cease fire we can get? Instead we talked 1350 01:15:33,560 --> 01:15:38,519 Speaker 4: about victory. There is no victory. I'm not saying this 1351 01:15:38,640 --> 01:15:42,360 Speaker 4: because I'm you know, some kind of defeat us. I'm 1352 01:15:42,400 --> 01:15:46,680 Speaker 4: saying this because the facts are clear, and all that 1353 01:15:46,840 --> 01:15:52,719 Speaker 4: is happening right now is the Russians are deepening their commitment. 1354 01:15:52,840 --> 01:15:57,200 Speaker 4: They're resolved to finish this thing in a way that 1355 01:15:57,400 --> 01:16:04,560 Speaker 4: meets there perceived security objectives. And their perceived security objective 1356 01:16:05,520 --> 01:16:09,360 Speaker 4: is to keep NATO out of Ukraine. And what they 1357 01:16:09,400 --> 01:16:12,320 Speaker 4: will do, what they are poised to do and can 1358 01:16:12,400 --> 01:16:15,280 Speaker 4: do at any time, except that they don't want to 1359 01:16:15,320 --> 01:16:19,320 Speaker 4: take the casualties at the moment because they have a 1360 01:16:19,320 --> 01:16:23,160 Speaker 4: strategy that's working. What they will do is they will 1361 01:16:23,160 --> 01:16:28,680 Speaker 4: take all of Ukraine, of the Black Sea coast. They 1362 01:16:28,680 --> 01:16:35,679 Speaker 4: will probably take up to Tiev the land there. They 1363 01:16:35,720 --> 01:16:41,400 Speaker 4: may take the main body of what we call Western Ukraine, 1364 01:16:41,800 --> 01:16:44,599 Speaker 4: but I don't think they want to do that because 1365 01:16:44,920 --> 01:16:49,599 Speaker 4: the Western Ukrainians are deeply hostile to Russians. But what 1366 01:16:49,640 --> 01:16:54,000 Speaker 4: they can do is they can then strangle Ukraine because 1367 01:16:54,000 --> 01:16:57,879 Speaker 4: the Black Sea Coast is the only way that Ukraine 1368 01:16:57,960 --> 01:17:04,880 Speaker 4: can take these tremendous resources they have in brain and 1369 01:17:05,000 --> 01:17:08,839 Speaker 4: sell them to the world. So they can just stop 1370 01:17:09,200 --> 01:17:13,920 Speaker 4: Ukraine from being an economically viable enterprise. So I don't 1371 01:17:13,960 --> 01:17:16,880 Speaker 4: have any idea what they will do. But why do 1372 01:17:16,960 --> 01:17:20,000 Speaker 4: we want to play this game? And this is an 1373 01:17:20,040 --> 01:17:23,799 Speaker 4: American decision at this point, and it's the only decision 1374 01:17:23,960 --> 01:17:29,679 Speaker 4: we have all this fiction, which I believe is designed 1375 01:17:29,720 --> 01:17:36,639 Speaker 4: to prevent the average American from understanding that the war 1376 01:17:36,760 --> 01:17:40,760 Speaker 4: in Ukraine is lost and that this could have implications 1377 01:17:40,800 --> 01:17:44,080 Speaker 4: for the November election. That's what's going on here. 1378 01:17:44,920 --> 01:17:48,559 Speaker 1: If you're I was saying, if you're able to come 1379 01:17:48,600 --> 01:17:51,720 Speaker 1: to that assessment, you can imagine that the Ukrainian leadership, 1380 01:17:51,800 --> 01:17:55,519 Speaker 1: you know, understands the current military strategy of Russia and 1381 01:17:55,560 --> 01:17:59,320 Speaker 1: the current military situation they're in, which would lend you know, 1382 01:17:59,400 --> 01:18:02,360 Speaker 1: either to our and some type of impulse for you know, 1383 01:18:02,400 --> 01:18:05,439 Speaker 1: a negotiated solution to this or something desperate. And it 1384 01:18:05,520 --> 01:18:07,759 Speaker 1: seems like what we're seeing in the last several days 1385 01:18:07,880 --> 01:18:13,120 Speaker 1: and weeks is desperation. Yesterday there was another strike on 1386 01:18:13,280 --> 01:18:16,880 Speaker 1: a Russian kind of radar facility. My understanding from our 1387 01:18:16,920 --> 01:18:19,040 Speaker 1: conversation that you and I had yesterdays that that that 1388 01:18:19,040 --> 01:18:21,719 Speaker 1: that is not an early that that was not necessarily and. 1389 01:18:21,880 --> 01:18:22,519 Speaker 4: That's a command. 1390 01:18:23,360 --> 01:18:25,760 Speaker 1: So what can you talk about these latest strikes and 1391 01:18:25,800 --> 01:18:26,719 Speaker 1: how those play in. 1392 01:18:27,439 --> 01:18:32,519 Speaker 4: Well, the strikes on the Russian UH, yesterday's strike was 1393 01:18:32,560 --> 01:18:37,760 Speaker 4: on a radar system that is is designed for communications 1394 01:18:37,800 --> 01:18:46,679 Speaker 4: too to two space systems that are extremely deep in space. 1395 01:18:47,479 --> 01:18:51,320 Speaker 4: It's it's on UH, it's in a southern latitude. It's 1396 01:18:51,360 --> 01:18:54,960 Speaker 4: so it's it's not associated with the early warning system 1397 01:18:55,120 --> 01:19:02,680 Speaker 4: very fortunately, but it's it's UH. It's simply a provocation, 1398 01:19:02,920 --> 01:19:07,599 Speaker 4: but not something that is going to raise the alert 1399 01:19:07,640 --> 01:19:13,080 Speaker 4: status of the Russian nuclear forces. The Russians have a 1400 01:19:13,080 --> 01:19:17,120 Speaker 4: big space program. They have probes they send to the Moon, 1401 01:19:17,320 --> 01:19:21,320 Speaker 4: to Mars and Venus, and these things are very very 1402 01:19:21,320 --> 01:19:24,720 Speaker 4: far away in space, and they have a gigantic and 1403 01:19:24,840 --> 01:19:30,360 Speaker 4: tennis that focus radio signals on those specific objects, so 1404 01:19:30,400 --> 01:19:34,200 Speaker 4: they could communicate signals to them and get information back. 1405 01:19:35,080 --> 01:19:38,559 Speaker 4: So that's what that particular facility was. 1406 01:19:39,040 --> 01:19:42,559 Speaker 1: Would there be any military value in taking out one 1407 01:19:42,600 --> 01:19:44,760 Speaker 1: of those deep space facilities. 1408 01:19:46,040 --> 01:19:53,719 Speaker 4: No, it would be just doing damage to their civil 1409 01:19:53,880 --> 01:19:56,760 Speaker 4: space program, their science space program. It would just be 1410 01:19:56,840 --> 01:20:00,560 Speaker 4: an irritant I mean in terms of there's no military 1411 01:20:00,800 --> 01:20:05,000 Speaker 4: utility to that attack. It's an attack that says we 1412 01:20:05,080 --> 01:20:10,160 Speaker 4: want to hurt you, just like unfortunately, our secretary of 1413 01:20:10,160 --> 01:20:16,879 Speaker 4: Defense said at one time, he said, well, we we 1414 01:20:17,080 --> 01:20:20,840 Speaker 4: want to do strategic damage to Russia. He actually said that. 1415 01:20:21,520 --> 01:20:25,599 Speaker 4: So when when someone in his position says something like that, 1416 01:20:26,240 --> 01:20:29,639 Speaker 4: how would you miss it if you were Russian? When 1417 01:20:29,880 --> 01:20:38,280 Speaker 4: when Anthony Blincoln tells Lavrov, Sergei Lavrov, that well, we 1418 01:20:38,360 --> 01:20:43,160 Speaker 4: reserve the right to put nuclear ballistic missiles in Ukraine, 1419 01:20:44,439 --> 01:20:48,240 Speaker 4: what does he think Lavrov is thinking? It would be 1420 01:20:48,360 --> 01:20:52,080 Speaker 4: like telling John F. Kennedy during the Cuba Cuban missile 1421 01:20:52,120 --> 01:20:55,559 Speaker 4: crisis that we deserve the right to put nuclear arm 1422 01:20:55,600 --> 01:21:00,880 Speaker 4: ballistic missiles in Cuba, so you Americans don't get tough luck. 1423 01:21:01,760 --> 01:21:06,080 Speaker 4: I mean, I don't understand what this administration thinks it's doing. 1424 01:21:06,880 --> 01:21:09,280 Speaker 4: It's just I mean, it's incomprehensible to me. 1425 01:21:10,320 --> 01:21:12,960 Speaker 1: What about the election is interesting, I'm sorry. The point 1426 01:21:12,960 --> 01:21:17,040 Speaker 1: about the election is interesting that the administration may be thinking, well, 1427 01:21:17,040 --> 01:21:20,760 Speaker 1: this is off the front pages for now, so we 1428 01:21:20,800 --> 01:21:23,639 Speaker 1: can keep If we can keep it off the front 1429 01:21:23,680 --> 01:21:28,280 Speaker 1: pages through November, then maybe that reduces the risk to 1430 01:21:28,320 --> 01:21:29,640 Speaker 1: the electoral calculus. 1431 01:21:30,080 --> 01:21:33,160 Speaker 4: Oh, I think that's clearly what's going on. I don't, 1432 01:21:33,439 --> 01:21:35,920 Speaker 4: you know, I don't know, you know, but you know, 1433 01:21:35,920 --> 01:21:38,360 Speaker 4: if I look at the body language, so to speak, 1434 01:21:39,000 --> 01:21:44,320 Speaker 4: that's absolutely what's going on. They're in a panic because 1435 01:21:44,400 --> 01:21:47,760 Speaker 4: they understand, or should understand, they don't understand. God help 1436 01:21:47,840 --> 01:21:50,760 Speaker 4: us all. They are in a panic because they know 1437 01:21:51,640 --> 01:21:55,000 Speaker 4: that the whole situation in Ukraine could collapse at any time. 1438 01:21:56,040 --> 01:22:01,120 Speaker 4: Ukrainian units are refusing to follow orders in many cases now. 1439 01:22:01,160 --> 01:22:04,360 Speaker 4: We have reports of that even the other day in 1440 01:22:04,360 --> 01:22:09,439 Speaker 4: this Azov unit, which is a bunch of neo Nazis. 1441 01:22:09,600 --> 01:22:14,360 Speaker 4: These guys are ultra nationalists. Their followers of this guy 1442 01:22:15,120 --> 01:22:20,400 Speaker 4: step On Bandera. Vandera was the guy who fostered a 1443 01:22:20,439 --> 01:22:24,439 Speaker 4: political movement that resulted in the murder of one hundred 1444 01:22:24,439 --> 01:22:28,439 Speaker 4: and fifty thousand Polish people during the World War Two. 1445 01:22:28,680 --> 01:22:36,400 Speaker 4: And also the population of ss Gestapo units with Ukrainian volunteers. 1446 01:22:36,920 --> 01:22:39,280 Speaker 4: That's that's, that's the Ukraine. 1447 01:22:38,960 --> 01:22:42,400 Speaker 1: That they don't want, even that even that unit is 1448 01:22:43,280 --> 01:22:44,040 Speaker 1: facing trouble. 1449 01:22:44,640 --> 01:22:47,320 Speaker 4: It's it's what they did, is they there was a 1450 01:22:47,360 --> 01:22:50,640 Speaker 4: general in charge of the area where they were assigned, 1451 01:22:51,600 --> 01:22:54,800 Speaker 4: that was It's not clear what was happening, but I 1452 01:22:54,800 --> 01:22:58,760 Speaker 4: could take a very good, well informed guess they were 1453 01:22:59,040 --> 01:23:05,920 Speaker 4: probably order attacks on counter attacks on Russian units. Now, 1454 01:23:06,080 --> 01:23:14,800 Speaker 4: these counter attacks cause extraordinary levels of casualties among the Ukrainians, 1455 01:23:14,880 --> 01:23:19,400 Speaker 4: and the reason for this is that the Russians now 1456 01:23:19,479 --> 01:23:23,840 Speaker 4: have complete control of the air. So this is what 1457 01:23:23,920 --> 01:23:26,360 Speaker 4: the Americans have typically in a war. You know, we 1458 01:23:26,439 --> 01:23:28,400 Speaker 4: have complete control of the air, but the Russians have 1459 01:23:28,479 --> 01:23:33,840 Speaker 4: an ear and they also have ten to one artillery 1460 01:23:33,920 --> 01:23:38,200 Speaker 4: firing capability ten to one. So when you go out, 1461 01:23:38,479 --> 01:23:40,679 Speaker 4: when you get out of your foxhole and go running 1462 01:23:40,720 --> 01:23:46,599 Speaker 4: at the enemy, they slaughter you. And this is exactly 1463 01:23:46,640 --> 01:23:51,839 Speaker 4: the kind of combat strategy the Ukraine has been involved 1464 01:23:51,880 --> 01:23:55,759 Speaker 4: in for the last couple of years. A very high 1465 01:23:55,800 --> 01:24:00,000 Speaker 4: percentage of the losses that the Ukrainians have been suffering 1466 01:24:00,800 --> 01:24:05,679 Speaker 4: are due to these hopeless attacks. Rather than falling back 1467 01:24:05,760 --> 01:24:09,880 Speaker 4: and trying to defend positions and letting the Russians try 1468 01:24:09,880 --> 01:24:13,200 Speaker 4: to take those positions, they just run into the fire 1469 01:24:14,600 --> 01:24:20,400 Speaker 4: of the Russians. And it's very clear that Kluton does 1470 01:24:20,439 --> 01:24:26,439 Speaker 4: not want a large number of Russian casualties. It's very 1471 01:24:26,479 --> 01:24:29,439 Speaker 4: hard to know what's actually happening. So this is a guess. 1472 01:24:29,560 --> 01:24:32,200 Speaker 4: I want to be clear, this is a guess, But 1473 01:24:32,320 --> 01:24:37,280 Speaker 4: my guess is that the casualties being taken by the 1474 01:24:37,400 --> 01:24:41,680 Speaker 4: Ukrainians are five to one. So when you hear about 1475 01:24:42,479 --> 01:24:47,760 Speaker 4: fifteen hundred casualties being taken, which is sort of the 1476 01:24:47,840 --> 01:24:50,360 Speaker 4: average during the day, fifteen hundred to two thousand, right 1477 01:24:50,400 --> 01:24:53,920 Speaker 4: now you're talking about three hundred or three hundred and 1478 01:24:53,920 --> 01:24:57,840 Speaker 4: fifty or four hundred casualties on the part of the Russians. 1479 01:24:58,280 --> 01:25:02,880 Speaker 4: So this is a massacre. And you know, my own 1480 01:25:04,040 --> 01:25:10,880 Speaker 4: view of this is I'm terribly upset about it because 1481 01:25:11,600 --> 01:25:13,600 Speaker 4: I from my point of view, you can call me 1482 01:25:13,760 --> 01:25:17,160 Speaker 4: whatever you want, but I just see innocent people on 1483 01:25:17,240 --> 01:25:20,880 Speaker 4: both these Russian soldiers are no more guilty than these 1484 01:25:20,960 --> 01:25:25,519 Speaker 4: Ukrainian soldiers who have been forced into combat, and they're 1485 01:25:25,720 --> 01:25:30,040 Speaker 4: murdering each other for no reason. Because Ukraine is lost, 1486 01:25:31,040 --> 01:25:34,599 Speaker 4: and the political decision makers are sitting in the White House, 1487 01:25:34,640 --> 01:25:37,559 Speaker 4: and in this case they are the ones because they 1488 01:25:38,360 --> 01:25:44,080 Speaker 4: have these step on Budera extremists in charge in Ukraine. 1489 01:25:44,960 --> 01:25:49,200 Speaker 4: The White House is trying to sustain the appearance with 1490 01:25:49,280 --> 01:25:51,760 Speaker 4: the help unfortunately of the American press, which has not 1491 01:25:51,800 --> 01:25:54,920 Speaker 4: done a very good job, that this war is still 1492 01:25:55,479 --> 01:25:59,960 Speaker 4: open to a potential positive end for the United State. 1493 01:26:00,120 --> 01:26:01,519 Speaker 4: It's actually over. 1494 01:26:02,360 --> 01:26:07,760 Speaker 3: And I'm sorry, well I was Actually that's a big 1495 01:26:07,840 --> 01:26:11,280 Speaker 3: picture question. I'm so curious, as you've worked in the 1496 01:26:11,320 --> 01:26:15,280 Speaker 3: space for decades, just thinking about what's happening at the 1497 01:26:15,320 --> 01:26:20,120 Speaker 3: White House, as you just outlined it, how does this 1498 01:26:20,160 --> 01:26:25,320 Speaker 3: moment compare to previous moments of potential escalation to the 1499 01:26:25,360 --> 01:26:29,599 Speaker 3: point where the threat of nuclear conflict? You know, maybe 1500 01:26:29,600 --> 01:26:33,599 Speaker 3: even in recent memory. Obviously you mentioned earlier your history 1501 01:26:33,600 --> 01:26:37,160 Speaker 3: in the space in the nineteen eighties, but just maybe 1502 01:26:37,240 --> 01:26:39,439 Speaker 3: even over the course of the last ten twenty years, 1503 01:26:39,479 --> 01:26:42,080 Speaker 3: has there been a moment as precarious as this is. 1504 01:26:42,120 --> 01:26:45,160 Speaker 3: It always as precarious as this. How does this compare? 1505 01:26:45,800 --> 01:26:53,400 Speaker 6: Well, The problem is there could be a completely unforeseen 1506 01:26:53,720 --> 01:26:55,880 Speaker 6: series of accidents. 1507 01:26:56,360 --> 01:27:00,000 Speaker 4: Let me give you an example. We know this happened. 1508 01:27:00,600 --> 01:27:02,519 Speaker 4: We know this happened. In fact, I have studied in 1509 01:27:02,640 --> 01:27:06,680 Speaker 4: some great detail and I've written about it. We know 1510 01:27:06,880 --> 01:27:11,000 Speaker 4: that in nineteen ninety six, nineteen ninety six, it was 1511 01:27:11,080 --> 01:27:16,760 Speaker 4: yeltsin Clinton, and we were in this phase where both 1512 01:27:16,840 --> 01:27:19,920 Speaker 4: Russia and the United States were hoping to have a 1513 01:27:19,960 --> 01:27:23,400 Speaker 4: holy new relationship. We watched it, in my view, but 1514 01:27:23,439 --> 01:27:27,840 Speaker 4: that's another discussion. But people were not at each other 1515 01:27:27,880 --> 01:27:33,479 Speaker 4: at all, and it was there was a sounding rocket, 1516 01:27:33,520 --> 01:27:37,080 Speaker 4: a rocket that's launched vertically by scientists, you know, point 1517 01:27:37,120 --> 01:27:40,640 Speaker 4: beheading people like me who were just who were just 1518 01:27:40,680 --> 01:27:45,840 Speaker 4: trying to understand take measurements in the ionosphere, upper ionosphere. 1519 01:27:46,160 --> 01:27:49,080 Speaker 4: And they launched this rocket in a near vertical trajectory 1520 01:27:49,479 --> 01:27:52,960 Speaker 4: slightly tipped over away from Russia, but it went to 1521 01:27:53,000 --> 01:27:56,040 Speaker 4: a very high altitude eleven thousand kilometers and it was 1522 01:27:56,080 --> 01:27:59,680 Speaker 4: taking measurements of the ionosphere. Well, the problem with this 1523 01:27:59,800 --> 01:28:05,280 Speaker 4: rock was that its powered flight trajectory had the appearance 1524 01:28:05,320 --> 01:28:08,760 Speaker 4: of a trident ballistic missile of going through a near 1525 01:28:08,880 --> 01:28:15,600 Speaker 4: vertical trajectory. Now most people would say, why does that matter, Well, this, 1526 01:28:15,600 --> 01:28:18,080 Speaker 4: this could be the first part of a nuclear attack 1527 01:28:18,880 --> 01:28:22,200 Speaker 4: where you detonate a nuclear weapon at high altitude and 1528 01:28:22,240 --> 01:28:27,280 Speaker 4: it creates a sort of a radar absorbing layer in 1529 01:28:27,320 --> 01:28:30,000 Speaker 4: the atmosphere. So it's it's like you took a blanket, 1530 01:28:30,040 --> 01:28:32,240 Speaker 4: you threw it over the radar. Or if you have 1531 01:28:32,760 --> 01:28:36,840 Speaker 4: think of yourself as a as someone who's watching and 1532 01:28:36,880 --> 01:28:41,360 Speaker 4: I throw I throw a blanket over your head, so 1533 01:28:41,439 --> 01:28:45,000 Speaker 4: now you can't see anything. And this kind of precursor 1534 01:28:45,120 --> 01:28:50,600 Speaker 4: attack is exactly something you had both sides, Russia and 1535 01:28:50,640 --> 01:28:54,720 Speaker 4: the United States planned for in their own nuclear war 1536 01:28:55,000 --> 01:29:02,599 Speaker 4: retaliation findings, you know, planning. Now, in nineteen ninety six, 1537 01:29:03,520 --> 01:29:06,800 Speaker 4: you had a very In fact, I've spoken with the 1538 01:29:06,840 --> 01:29:09,920 Speaker 4: guy who was in charge. His name is Victor Yessen. 1539 01:29:10,400 --> 01:29:12,759 Speaker 4: He was the guy in charge of the Strategic Rocket 1540 01:29:12,760 --> 01:29:16,800 Speaker 4: Forces at the time, and he's a very sober, extremely 1541 01:29:17,160 --> 01:29:21,880 Speaker 4: well educated, competent man, and he sat there watching this thing, 1542 01:29:22,200 --> 01:29:26,200 Speaker 4: this experiment, which he had no idea whether or not 1543 01:29:26,280 --> 01:29:30,680 Speaker 4: it was a nuclear weapon, rise to its maximum altitude. 1544 01:29:31,280 --> 01:29:34,599 Speaker 4: In the moment it started to fall back to the earth, 1545 01:29:34,800 --> 01:29:39,240 Speaker 4: he called off the alert because he knew that this 1546 01:29:39,479 --> 01:29:42,000 Speaker 4: whatever it was, he didn't know what it was, but 1547 01:29:42,080 --> 01:29:46,120 Speaker 4: he knew it was not a precursor of nuclear attack. Now, 1548 01:29:46,200 --> 01:29:48,920 Speaker 4: if the time was, if we had big fighting going 1549 01:29:48,960 --> 01:29:52,559 Speaker 4: on in the Ukraine, in Ukraine at the time, in 1550 01:29:52,600 --> 01:29:57,120 Speaker 4: the United States in Russia, maybe we're using tactical nuclear 1551 01:29:57,160 --> 01:30:01,479 Speaker 4: weapons against each other or very so is very very 1552 01:30:01,520 --> 01:30:05,839 Speaker 4: serious escalation. NATO troops were injected, you know, the French 1553 01:30:05,880 --> 01:30:12,839 Speaker 4: troops that Ma Kron wants to put into into Ukraine. 1554 01:30:13,080 --> 01:30:15,639 Speaker 4: They're being slaughtered by the Russians, which of course will 1555 01:30:15,640 --> 01:30:20,560 Speaker 4: happen if those troops are there, and you know, the 1556 01:30:20,640 --> 01:30:24,559 Speaker 4: Russians could think they were under attack. Now, I think 1557 01:30:24,560 --> 01:30:27,760 Speaker 4: they are very cautious. So I don't want to overstate this, 1558 01:30:29,000 --> 01:30:31,479 Speaker 4: you know, I mean, the Russians are very cautious, They're 1559 01:30:31,600 --> 01:30:35,720 Speaker 4: very competent, they're very professional. They understand that if they 1560 01:30:35,760 --> 01:30:38,240 Speaker 4: accidentally attack the United States, it's the end of their 1561 01:30:38,280 --> 01:30:41,559 Speaker 4: country too. So I don't want to overstate this. But 1562 01:30:42,200 --> 01:30:45,280 Speaker 4: the question I would ask you to consider is do 1563 01:30:45,360 --> 01:30:49,080 Speaker 4: you think they're them having this state of mind at 1564 01:30:49,080 --> 01:30:52,320 Speaker 4: that time without a complete knowledge of what's going on, 1565 01:30:52,880 --> 01:30:55,479 Speaker 4: is a good thing for the United states. That's the 1566 01:30:56,040 --> 01:30:57,920 Speaker 4: So I don't want to be one of these people. O. 1567 01:30:58,000 --> 01:31:01,320 Speaker 4: The sky is falling, the sky has fallen. But when 1568 01:31:01,320 --> 01:31:06,800 Speaker 4: the consequences are literally the end of civilization and you know, 1569 01:31:06,840 --> 01:31:12,160 Speaker 4: potentially the end of human existence that is less clear, 1570 01:31:12,280 --> 01:31:17,200 Speaker 4: but certainly the end of civilization as we know it, 1571 01:31:18,120 --> 01:31:22,360 Speaker 4: why would you want to push push the buttons on this. 1572 01:31:22,479 --> 01:31:27,839 Speaker 4: I don't understand. I'm baffled. And part of the reason 1573 01:31:28,120 --> 01:31:31,360 Speaker 4: may be that the people in the White House are 1574 01:31:31,520 --> 01:31:35,240 Speaker 4: not informed. And that's been my experience. Incidentally, I've talked 1575 01:31:35,280 --> 01:31:39,479 Speaker 4: to people over decades from time to time in White 1576 01:31:39,479 --> 01:31:43,280 Speaker 4: House positions and they don't have a clue there. Because 1577 01:31:43,320 --> 01:31:47,479 Speaker 4: these people are political and I'm not saying this to 1578 01:31:47,560 --> 01:31:51,640 Speaker 4: attack them. They're concerned is how do I get reelected 1579 01:31:51,680 --> 01:31:54,680 Speaker 4: and how do I how do I keep the American 1580 01:31:54,720 --> 01:31:58,639 Speaker 4: public from knowing my dark secret, you know, my screw 1581 01:31:58,720 --> 01:32:03,080 Speaker 4: up on something. And that's why you see all this 1582 01:32:04,280 --> 01:32:08,280 Speaker 4: Kate mongering for Putin. You know, Putin is our adversary. 1583 01:32:08,360 --> 01:32:13,680 Speaker 4: There's no question that he doesn't mean good things for us. 1584 01:32:14,080 --> 01:32:17,519 Speaker 4: But he's not Adolphe. I mean, this is ridiculous. He's 1585 01:32:17,560 --> 01:32:20,880 Speaker 4: a very capable guy who is Jiu jitsing us in 1586 01:32:20,960 --> 01:32:23,920 Speaker 4: so many circumstances. These guys don't want the American people 1587 01:32:23,960 --> 01:32:28,080 Speaker 4: to figure out how clever he has been and how 1588 01:32:28,120 --> 01:32:30,280 Speaker 4: everything we have done to try to screw up the 1589 01:32:30,360 --> 01:32:33,960 Speaker 4: Russians has backfired on us because the Russians have been 1590 01:32:34,320 --> 01:32:37,280 Speaker 4: clever and responding. So what do you do. You don't 1591 01:32:37,280 --> 01:32:39,080 Speaker 4: want to You can't explain this. You don't want to 1592 01:32:39,080 --> 01:32:42,560 Speaker 4: explain this to your electorate. You're trying to get reelected. 1593 01:32:42,920 --> 01:32:45,040 Speaker 4: So he say, oh, it's this guy Putin. He's so terrible, 1594 01:32:45,200 --> 01:32:48,000 Speaker 4: he's so such a Now I'm not trying to say 1595 01:32:48,040 --> 01:32:50,320 Speaker 4: that I would want to run against put In an 1596 01:32:50,360 --> 01:32:55,080 Speaker 4: election in Russia. He killed me. But but you know, 1597 01:32:57,320 --> 01:33:01,960 Speaker 4: Muhammed Ben Salmon is not our oneful somebuddy either. You know, 1598 01:33:02,000 --> 01:33:06,040 Speaker 4: these countries have their own political systems, and when you 1599 01:33:07,160 --> 01:33:11,200 Speaker 4: when you recognize what's going on in those systems, doesn't 1600 01:33:11,240 --> 01:33:13,920 Speaker 4: mean you approve of them, and it doesn't mean you 1601 01:33:13,960 --> 01:33:17,960 Speaker 4: think it's good. It's just understanding the facts of the world. 1602 01:33:18,400 --> 01:33:23,799 Speaker 4: And this guy, this guy Putin, is unbelievably thoughtful, deep thinking, 1603 01:33:23,960 --> 01:33:27,400 Speaker 4: and strategic in his thinking. And he just said just 1604 01:33:27,520 --> 01:33:31,280 Speaker 4: yesterday that he's going to find a way to pay 1605 01:33:31,360 --> 01:33:35,040 Speaker 4: us back for what he sees as this attack. And 1606 01:33:35,120 --> 01:33:39,320 Speaker 4: let me tell you, he doesn't bluff. He doesn't bluff. 1607 01:33:39,880 --> 01:33:43,519 Speaker 4: I have watched him with extreme care, and when he 1608 01:33:43,640 --> 01:33:46,120 Speaker 4: says something, I don't say, Oh, he's a monster, what 1609 01:33:46,200 --> 01:33:49,160 Speaker 4: are you know? Blah blah. You know, I take it 1610 01:33:49,240 --> 01:33:52,479 Speaker 4: at its word. And I asked myself, what does this 1611 01:33:52,600 --> 01:33:59,280 Speaker 4: guy mean? And we have had a decades of people 1612 01:33:59,320 --> 01:34:04,080 Speaker 4: who claim to be experts on Russia feeding us nonsense 1613 01:34:04,200 --> 01:34:08,479 Speaker 4: about what a monster this man is. He's not a 1614 01:34:08,600 --> 01:34:12,639 Speaker 4: nice person. You wouldn't want him as your close personal friend. 1615 01:34:13,560 --> 01:34:17,280 Speaker 4: But that is different from portraying him as this monster 1616 01:34:17,360 --> 01:34:21,080 Speaker 4: that goes around murdering people. Whenever he has the notion, 1617 01:34:21,280 --> 01:34:24,080 Speaker 4: it's not the case at all. You'll you just have 1618 01:34:24,120 --> 01:34:25,880 Speaker 4: to look at the facts. And so we have these 1619 01:34:25,880 --> 01:34:29,160 Speaker 4: people who in one way or another are getting funding 1620 01:34:29,200 --> 01:34:31,439 Speaker 4: from the US government to a field an alliance to 1621 01:34:31,479 --> 01:34:35,720 Speaker 4: the US government, who have painted this portrait that is 1622 01:34:36,760 --> 01:34:42,559 Speaker 4: totally bizarre. I mean, why don't we do that with 1623 01:34:43,080 --> 01:34:46,000 Speaker 4: other you know, you know, he's not hitler. 1624 01:34:46,840 --> 01:34:53,960 Speaker 1: I mean, underestimating your adversary usually doesn't usually doesn't end well. 1625 01:34:54,760 --> 01:34:58,519 Speaker 4: Well, it's not simply underestimating it's portraying your adversary in 1626 01:34:58,600 --> 01:35:02,200 Speaker 4: a way that hides your bad decisions that are backfired 1627 01:35:02,200 --> 01:35:06,080 Speaker 4: on you. So it's what I consider it a politically 1628 01:35:06,280 --> 01:35:07,800 Speaker 4: motivated strategy. 1629 01:35:09,320 --> 01:35:12,479 Speaker 1: Well, Theodore Postal, thank you so much for joining us, 1630 01:35:12,560 --> 01:35:13,200 Speaker 1: you know very much. 1631 01:35:13,280 --> 01:35:17,040 Speaker 4: Pretty it's been a pleasure. I hope it's been helpful. 1632 01:35:17,360 --> 01:35:19,639 Speaker 1: Very helpful, very helpful. Indeed, very much appreciated. 1633 01:35:20,040 --> 01:35:20,920 Speaker 4: Thank you very much. 1634 01:35:21,439 --> 01:35:24,920 Speaker 1: That was Ted Postal rather sobering a conversation a little 1635 01:35:24,920 --> 01:35:29,439 Speaker 1: bit when when he joined us, he looked behind and said, 1636 01:35:29,479 --> 01:35:30,840 Speaker 1: I see Washington is still there. 1637 01:35:31,320 --> 01:35:32,640 Speaker 3: But then we had to say, well, it's on a 1638 01:35:32,640 --> 01:35:33,240 Speaker 3: loop episode. 1639 01:35:33,479 --> 01:35:36,160 Speaker 1: But the fact that we're alive suggest that Washington is 1640 01:35:36,160 --> 01:35:37,439 Speaker 1: still here. We are in Washington. 1641 01:35:37,520 --> 01:35:41,080 Speaker 3: Yeah, we're not in like a bunker, although his bunker 1642 01:35:41,160 --> 01:35:42,439 Speaker 3: temperature sometimes yes. 1643 01:35:42,479 --> 01:35:49,479 Speaker 1: Indeed. Anyway, we're having a Ukrainian conversation debate on our 1644 01:35:49,560 --> 01:35:53,720 Speaker 1: Friday show, so you know, come back Thursday evening for 1645 01:35:53,760 --> 01:35:56,960 Speaker 1: that if you are a Breaking Point subscriber breakingpoints dot 1646 01:35:57,000 --> 01:36:00,240 Speaker 1: com to get the to get that early. Otherwise, as 1647 01:36:00,280 --> 01:36:02,559 Speaker 1: you can watch the full show on Friday, We're going 1648 01:36:02,640 --> 01:36:07,960 Speaker 1: to have another streamer, vash talking to a libertarian state 1649 01:36:08,240 --> 01:36:09,960 Speaker 1: median with the comedian. 1650 01:36:10,240 --> 01:36:11,439 Speaker 3: What's h comedian? 1651 01:36:11,600 --> 01:36:16,000 Speaker 1: So they're going to be teasing out their own takes 1652 01:36:16,040 --> 01:36:18,040 Speaker 1: on the Ukrainian conflict, and. 1653 01:36:18,000 --> 01:36:22,400 Speaker 3: We're tableted today a little inside baseball. So this is 1654 01:36:22,400 --> 01:36:24,639 Speaker 3: one of two debates that Ryan and I are moderating. 1655 01:36:26,120 --> 01:36:27,559 Speaker 3: Somehow become debate moderator. 1656 01:36:27,640 --> 01:36:30,080 Speaker 1: We have. Life comes at you. 1657 01:36:30,040 --> 01:36:33,360 Speaker 3: Fast, sure does, so stay tuned for the breaking points 1658 01:36:33,360 --> 01:36:36,400 Speaker 3: debate coverage that you know CNN won't let us carry 1659 01:36:36,439 --> 01:36:38,759 Speaker 3: the stream, but we will be here carrying the stream 1660 01:36:38,800 --> 01:36:42,400 Speaker 3: with Crystal and Sager tomorrow eight pm. Whether or not 1661 01:36:42,479 --> 01:36:46,240 Speaker 3: CNN lets us pick up on the debate stream eight pm. 1662 01:36:46,479 --> 01:36:50,479 Speaker 3: Right here seven pm tonight through Zero Hedge Debate. But 1663 01:36:50,600 --> 01:36:52,519 Speaker 3: that does it for us for this morning. 1664 01:36:52,560 --> 01:36:55,240 Speaker 1: At least. We'll be back pretty soon see you tonight. 1665 01:36:55,439 --> 01:36:55,800 Speaker 1: So yeah,