WEBVTT - Twitter Hits Back at Musk

0:00:02.240 --> 0:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>From the heart of where innovation, money and power collive

0:00:06.360 --> 0:00:10.879
<v Speaker 1>in Silicon Valley and beyond. This is Bloomberg Technology with

0:00:10.960 --> 0:00:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Emily Jay. I'm Emily Chang in San Francisco, and this

0:00:27.480 --> 0:00:30.400
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Technology. Coming up in the next hour to court,

0:00:30.480 --> 0:00:34.440
<v Speaker 1>Musk goes. Twitter's lawyers say his termination of the deal

0:00:34.600 --> 0:00:37.920
<v Speaker 1>was wrongful. We will talk to a former Twitter insider

0:00:38.000 --> 0:00:42.600
<v Speaker 1>about where the legal saga goes from here. Claus Peloton's

0:00:42.640 --> 0:00:46.159
<v Speaker 1>uphill battle continues. The Connected fitness company will now stop

0:00:46.200 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 1>making bikes in house shares jumping on the news. We're

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:52.839
<v Speaker 1>gonna have all the details and funding for crypto startups

0:00:52.880 --> 0:00:56.400
<v Speaker 1>plummeted last quarter. We'll ask Light Speed Venture partners why

0:00:56.480 --> 0:00:59.760
<v Speaker 1>they are planning to double down on the blockchain and

0:00:59.800 --> 0:01:01.959
<v Speaker 1>so coy is Jess Lee will join us to talk

0:01:01.960 --> 0:01:04.200
<v Speaker 1>about their new plan to hunt for what they call

0:01:04.400 --> 0:01:09.480
<v Speaker 1>outliers and put one million dollars behind these new ideas.

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I want to bring in Jason Goldman, now one of

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:14.600
<v Speaker 1>the founding members of Twitter and former White House Chief

0:01:15.040 --> 0:01:19.000
<v Speaker 1>Digital Officer under President Obama for some insider outsider perspective. Jason,

0:01:19.040 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 1>your timing is impeccable. Um look officially this is headed

0:01:23.600 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>to Delaware court. Does anybody win in the scenario? No

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:30.920
<v Speaker 1>matter what happens. Definitely the lawyers win. Uh. You know,

0:01:30.959 --> 0:01:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the lawyers are excited when they describe a case as

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:37.600
<v Speaker 1>being unprecedented and complicated. That's definitely code for there's going

0:01:37.640 --> 0:01:41.240
<v Speaker 1>to be unprecedented legal fees. So they're they're said, everyone

0:01:41.319 --> 0:01:43.399
<v Speaker 1>else is a loser in this. For sure. Elana shown

0:01:43.440 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 1>he can't be trusted to execute a signed deal. Uh.

0:01:46.000 --> 0:01:47.920
<v Speaker 1>The board is shown that they have no confidence along

0:01:48.000 --> 0:01:49.880
<v Speaker 1>term future of the company and are now going to

0:01:49.920 --> 0:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Delaware to consummate a transaction with a bad faith actor,

0:01:53.440 --> 0:01:55.480
<v Speaker 1>and the employees are left in limbo wondering what the

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 1>future of the company will hold. So look last week

0:01:59.120 --> 0:02:01.800
<v Speaker 1>when this happened, Att Taylor, the chairman of Twitter Boars,

0:02:02.000 --> 0:02:05.400
<v Speaker 1>said that you know they're committed to closing the transaction. Uh,

0:02:05.440 --> 0:02:07.960
<v Speaker 1>they plan to pursue legal action. Now here we are

0:02:08.480 --> 0:02:11.040
<v Speaker 1>seeing them pursue this legal action. Then that Ev Williams

0:02:11.040 --> 0:02:13.160
<v Speaker 1>getting into the frame. Obviously, I know you and have

0:02:13.280 --> 0:02:16.600
<v Speaker 1>worked very closely together in those early days. Responding to

0:02:16.680 --> 0:02:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Brett saying, I'm sure there are legal and fiduciary reasons

0:02:19.160 --> 0:02:21.360
<v Speaker 1>you have to say that, But if I was still

0:02:21.360 --> 0:02:23.160
<v Speaker 1>on the board, I'd be asking if we can just

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 1>let this whole ugly episode blow over. Hopefully that's the

0:02:26.600 --> 0:02:29.960
<v Speaker 1>plan and this is ceremony. What do you think the

0:02:30.000 --> 0:02:33.880
<v Speaker 1>plan actually is? And is this ceremony? No? I mean

0:02:33.919 --> 0:02:36.400
<v Speaker 1>at this point that the board has to sue and

0:02:36.440 --> 0:02:40.079
<v Speaker 1>try to get the agreement agreed to enforce, like they

0:02:40.080 --> 0:02:41.960
<v Speaker 1>they have no choice as the fiduciary is to do

0:02:42.000 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 1>anything but that. Um. I think whatever is I think

0:02:44.600 --> 0:02:46.760
<v Speaker 1>what I is expressing was I what was? What I

0:02:46.800 --> 0:02:48.920
<v Speaker 1>agree as well is that I wish the board had

0:02:48.960 --> 0:02:51.960
<v Speaker 1>had more insight at the beginning of this to realize

0:02:51.960 --> 0:02:54.119
<v Speaker 1>that they were dealing with someone who just wasn't serious

0:02:54.560 --> 0:02:56.720
<v Speaker 1>and didn't have a real plan for what to do

0:02:56.760 --> 0:02:59.480
<v Speaker 1>with the company. Uh and staid led by Jack, they

0:02:59.560 --> 0:03:03.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of became besotted with this idea of of Ellen

0:03:03.520 --> 0:03:05.959
<v Speaker 1>on the company. Uh And you know, the first step

0:03:06.120 --> 0:03:08.480
<v Speaker 1>of avoiding a trap is knowing that it's there, and

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:10.600
<v Speaker 1>the board just simply didn't realize that they were walking

0:03:10.600 --> 0:03:12.519
<v Speaker 1>into one and striking and deal with Ellen in the

0:03:12.560 --> 0:03:15.920
<v Speaker 1>first place. So why do you think Ellen actually did

0:03:15.919 --> 0:03:18.000
<v Speaker 1>this in the first place. You know, there's one venture

0:03:18.000 --> 0:03:20.360
<v Speaker 1>capitalists who pointed to the idea that he just wanted

0:03:20.360 --> 0:03:22.200
<v Speaker 1>to sell some Tesla stock. What do you think the

0:03:22.200 --> 0:03:26.040
<v Speaker 1>real motivation was. I think he enjoys using Twitter and

0:03:26.160 --> 0:03:28.320
<v Speaker 1>is addicted to the service and thought for a while

0:03:28.360 --> 0:03:30.200
<v Speaker 1>it would be it would be fun to own it.

0:03:30.400 --> 0:03:32.840
<v Speaker 1>I also think if you look at the proxies filing

0:03:32.880 --> 0:03:35.960
<v Speaker 1>statement that Twitter filed on the deal, that they were

0:03:36.160 --> 0:03:38.640
<v Speaker 1>they had assigned agreement to just get Ellen on the

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:40.680
<v Speaker 1>board and have a standstill agreement where you would own

0:03:40.680 --> 0:03:43.520
<v Speaker 1>more no more than fiftent of the company. Uh. And

0:03:43.520 --> 0:03:45.400
<v Speaker 1>then he had a conversation with Jack on the same

0:03:45.480 --> 0:03:48.200
<v Speaker 1>day that that agreement was announced, and it quickly pivoted

0:03:48.240 --> 0:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>to I should just own the company as a whole.

0:03:50.560 --> 0:03:52.240
<v Speaker 1>I think that's one of the reasons why this deal

0:03:52.280 --> 0:03:54.560
<v Speaker 1>is also likely to settle, is that there's probably a

0:03:54.600 --> 0:03:58.600
<v Speaker 1>lot of conversations between Ellen and the company in the

0:03:58.680 --> 0:04:01.839
<v Speaker 1>pre agree meant phase that they don't want to come

0:04:01.840 --> 0:04:04.880
<v Speaker 1>out in discovery, and so this is something that ultimately

0:04:04.960 --> 0:04:06.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't think will be decided by the courts, but

0:04:06.920 --> 0:04:10.080
<v Speaker 1>will be decided in a settlement between lawyers. Okay, but

0:04:10.120 --> 0:04:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I wonder how this plays out, you know, if Elon

0:04:13.120 --> 0:04:15.760
<v Speaker 1>Musk still ends up having to hold up his end

0:04:15.760 --> 0:04:18.320
<v Speaker 1>of the deal in Twitter quote unquote wins. Is that

0:04:18.360 --> 0:04:23.320
<v Speaker 1>good for anyone? No, it's not good for anyone the price,

0:04:23.520 --> 0:04:26.760
<v Speaker 1>it's not good for Twitter. If Elon ends up owning

0:04:26.760 --> 0:04:29.040
<v Speaker 1>the company because he doesn't have a real plan for

0:04:29.080 --> 0:04:30.719
<v Speaker 1>what he wants to do with it, he's revealed that

0:04:30.760 --> 0:04:33.200
<v Speaker 1>over time. It's also worth noting that there were any

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:37.240
<v Speaker 1>number of Silicon Valley luminaries that lined up behind Elon

0:04:37.839 --> 0:04:41.600
<v Speaker 1>owning the company uh and pledged to be equity partners. Uh.

0:04:41.720 --> 0:04:43.880
<v Speaker 1>You know, whether that's Andrews and Horowitz or Sekoya or

0:04:43.960 --> 0:04:47.279
<v Speaker 1>DFJ or Free Speech Advocate, the Guitar Sovereign Wealth Fund,

0:04:47.760 --> 0:04:50.520
<v Speaker 1>all of those folks have gone remarkably silent in terms

0:04:50.520 --> 0:04:54.040
<v Speaker 1>of their belief in Elon as the ultimate owner of

0:04:54.040 --> 0:04:57.200
<v Speaker 1>this company, because in his conversations he showed he wasn't

0:04:57.240 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 1>serious about what he would do with it. So Elon

0:04:59.400 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 1>owning it is good. A settlement is unlikely to equal

0:05:03.080 --> 0:05:06.560
<v Speaker 1>any amount of value that equals the damage done and

0:05:06.600 --> 0:05:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the real the real problem is that there's actual employees

0:05:10.040 --> 0:05:12.039
<v Speaker 1>who want to make a better product and want to

0:05:12.040 --> 0:05:14.000
<v Speaker 1>make the company better for the future, but they just

0:05:14.040 --> 0:05:16.800
<v Speaker 1>don't have the leadership that will enable them to do that.

0:05:17.400 --> 0:05:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Let's be clear. I mean, there are so many users,

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:23.280
<v Speaker 1>including Elon Musk, who love Twitter, love using Twitter, but

0:05:23.400 --> 0:05:25.840
<v Speaker 1>you know, Twitter over so many years, just hasn't been

0:05:25.880 --> 0:05:28.919
<v Speaker 1>able to parlay that into a significantly bigger business. What

0:05:29.000 --> 0:05:33.920
<v Speaker 1>would your plan be to increase engagement, to drive more revenue,

0:05:34.160 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>to increase the number of users. Well, let's be clear,

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:40.599
<v Speaker 1>I'm not here auditioning for any any job at Twitter.

0:05:40.680 --> 0:05:42.719
<v Speaker 1>I think what I think what the board needs to

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:44.919
<v Speaker 1>do at at this at the end of this juncture

0:05:45.000 --> 0:05:47.760
<v Speaker 1>is find new leadership. That's not a job I'm auditioning for.

0:05:48.120 --> 0:05:49.800
<v Speaker 1>What they I think they need to do is look

0:05:49.800 --> 0:05:53.080
<v Speaker 1>at what users that have found tremendous value from it

0:05:53.160 --> 0:05:55.240
<v Speaker 1>and build engagement around it. I don't think that the

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:58.440
<v Speaker 1>company is one silver bullet away or one feature away,

0:05:58.800 --> 0:06:01.360
<v Speaker 1>UM from fixing that. You're three that it's on um,

0:06:01.400 --> 0:06:05.120
<v Speaker 1>but it's it's it's obviously something that's always had cultural

0:06:05.240 --> 0:06:07.760
<v Speaker 1>value and cultural residence, and it's something that I think

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:10.920
<v Speaker 1>UH continues to play a role in global politics, in

0:06:10.920 --> 0:06:13.400
<v Speaker 1>the global conversation. You know, one one point on that

0:06:13.760 --> 0:06:17.720
<v Speaker 1>is we've spent months arguing what Ellen has meant about

0:06:17.800 --> 0:06:21.640
<v Speaker 1>free speech online, and he's slowly evolved that viewpoint from

0:06:21.680 --> 0:06:25.160
<v Speaker 1>just being mean anything to comply with legal requirements and

0:06:25.200 --> 0:06:28.240
<v Speaker 1>local regimes. In the meantime, while we've been debating trying

0:06:28.279 --> 0:06:30.640
<v Speaker 1>to tease out any meaning from what Elon's position on

0:06:30.680 --> 0:06:33.679
<v Speaker 1>free speech is, Twitter is actually in court in India

0:06:33.720 --> 0:06:37.520
<v Speaker 1>trying to push back on an authoritarian an authoritarian creep

0:06:37.760 --> 0:06:41.040
<v Speaker 1>into free speech laws in that country. And so there's actual,

0:06:41.160 --> 0:06:44.359
<v Speaker 1>real stakes at play here, and the company is fighting

0:06:44.400 --> 0:06:47.159
<v Speaker 1>good fights around the world. It's just that they're having

0:06:47.200 --> 0:06:51.240
<v Speaker 1>to do so now under this cloud of Elon's acquisition.

0:06:52.000 --> 0:06:54.920
<v Speaker 1>Real stakes. Indeed, Jason Goldman, one of the founding members

0:06:54.920 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 1>of Twitter, Former White House Chief Digital Officer Jason as

0:06:57.680 --> 0:07:02.160
<v Speaker 1>always thank you for your insights. Meantime, bargain hunters might

0:07:02.200 --> 0:07:05.039
<v Speaker 1>be will underwhelmed by Amazon's two day Prime Day sale.

0:07:05.080 --> 0:07:09.159
<v Speaker 1>The annual event began today, but many sellers are minimizing

0:07:09.200 --> 0:07:12.280
<v Speaker 1>their discounts to cover their own soaring costs. Prime Day

0:07:12.280 --> 0:07:15.360
<v Speaker 1>helps Amazon lock in shoppers before the holidays and deepen

0:07:15.480 --> 0:07:20.440
<v Speaker 1>its relationships with existing customers with deals on Amazon gadgets

0:07:20.480 --> 0:07:32.680
<v Speaker 1>like Echo Now, Peloton making a major strategic shift to

0:07:32.720 --> 0:07:35.760
<v Speaker 1>cut costs and streamline its strategy. The company will stop

0:07:36.160 --> 0:07:39.280
<v Speaker 1>building exercise bikes and treadmills at its own factories, a

0:07:39.320 --> 0:07:42.800
<v Speaker 1>big bet of the former leadership team. Peloton making this

0:07:42.880 --> 0:07:45.760
<v Speaker 1>change after several months of turmoil. Shares of the company

0:07:45.760 --> 0:07:50.240
<v Speaker 1>are down so far this year. Bloomberg Smart German, who

0:07:50.280 --> 0:07:53.040
<v Speaker 1>of course covers Peloton with us now for more so

0:07:53.120 --> 0:07:56.200
<v Speaker 1>talk to us about the significance of a pretty dramatic

0:07:56.200 --> 0:07:59.560
<v Speaker 1>shift here. Mark. This is an end to end overhaul

0:07:59.600 --> 0:08:01.680
<v Speaker 1>of their all operation. So just to set the scene,

0:08:02.000 --> 0:08:04.680
<v Speaker 1>let's look at Apple for a second. So Apple obviously

0:08:04.720 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 1>designs the iPhone and their other products, but what most

0:08:07.640 --> 0:08:10.000
<v Speaker 1>people don't know is that they have a third party

0:08:10.040 --> 0:08:13.560
<v Speaker 1>called fox Con that manufactures it. Right, so Apple works

0:08:13.600 --> 0:08:15.840
<v Speaker 1>hand in hand with Fox want to actually build those devices,

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:19.360
<v Speaker 1>They don't do it in house. Peloton, however, did both.

0:08:19.640 --> 0:08:22.160
<v Speaker 1>They built a big portion of their bikes in house

0:08:22.240 --> 0:08:25.880
<v Speaker 1>using their own facilities, and also contracted out another portion

0:08:25.920 --> 0:08:30.920
<v Speaker 1>of their devices to different technology manufacturers in Asia, one

0:08:30.960 --> 0:08:34.880
<v Speaker 1>called Rexon, one called Quanta, one called Pegatron. So what

0:08:34.920 --> 0:08:37.160
<v Speaker 1>Peloton is now going to do is they're seizing their

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:41.600
<v Speaker 1>in house production operations and they're moving entirely to contract manufacturers.

0:08:41.760 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 1>That's going to simplify their entire business model because instead

0:08:44.760 --> 0:08:47.760
<v Speaker 1>of having two distinct supply chains, they're not gonna have

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:50.920
<v Speaker 1>one supply chain. They're also unfortunately laying off about five

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:54.320
<v Speaker 1>seventy workers at their in house facilities, and they also

0:08:54.360 --> 0:08:56.760
<v Speaker 1>believe this is going to up product quality as there's

0:08:56.760 --> 0:08:59.320
<v Speaker 1>been some issues there because all of the in house

0:08:59.400 --> 0:09:01.240
<v Speaker 1>quality control role is going to be in one place.

0:09:01.520 --> 0:09:03.679
<v Speaker 1>You're not going to be split between two different production

0:09:03.800 --> 0:09:09.720
<v Speaker 1>development styles. So WILLNUS solve Peloton's problems? That's the question. Well,

0:09:09.760 --> 0:09:12.720
<v Speaker 1>Peloton has many many problems. This will solve one of them,

0:09:12.720 --> 0:09:15.839
<v Speaker 1>I think, right. One of their problems was the ability

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:19.719
<v Speaker 1>to gauge supply and demand and tie that to production. Right, So,

0:09:19.760 --> 0:09:23.640
<v Speaker 1>as we know, Peloton's downfall really happened after they overestimated

0:09:23.880 --> 0:09:27.480
<v Speaker 1>that demand would continue to occur even as the pandemic

0:09:27.559 --> 0:09:30.360
<v Speaker 1>slowed down. That left them with an over abundance of

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:33.559
<v Speaker 1>inventory and nearly created the company into the ground. We

0:09:33.600 --> 0:09:36.120
<v Speaker 1>see what's happened to their stock price. If they had

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:39.840
<v Speaker 1>had only contract manufacturers, that probably would have been easier

0:09:39.880 --> 0:09:42.880
<v Speaker 1>to resolve because now they're not owning all that inventory

0:09:42.920 --> 0:09:45.079
<v Speaker 1>in house. They're working with a third party and it

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:47.559
<v Speaker 1>will give them better supply and demand balance and allow

0:09:47.600 --> 0:09:51.080
<v Speaker 1>them to better optimize their supply chain. But Peloton's problems

0:09:51.080 --> 0:09:54.160
<v Speaker 1>go far beyond their supply chain. There's issues with pricing.

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:57.600
<v Speaker 1>There's issues with how much their subscription costs. There's issues

0:09:57.640 --> 0:10:00.000
<v Speaker 1>of people not wanting to even just buy their equipment.

0:10:00.040 --> 0:10:03.480
<v Speaker 1>And right there is competition, obviously, Apple Fitness Plus, there's

0:10:03.720 --> 0:10:07.320
<v Speaker 1>Nordic Track, There's so many other companies. There's Tonal, there's

0:10:07.320 --> 0:10:09.360
<v Speaker 1>the question if they're even hitting the market with the

0:10:09.400 --> 0:10:12.319
<v Speaker 1>correct products. Their product development is taking a long time.

0:10:12.360 --> 0:10:15.000
<v Speaker 1>They've been developing this rowing machine now for almost three

0:10:15.120 --> 0:10:18.120
<v Speaker 1>or four years. The Peloton Guide their new TV connected

0:10:18.160 --> 0:10:20.000
<v Speaker 1>device that has not gone off to a hot start.

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:22.960
<v Speaker 1>So to answer your question, this solves one of their problems,

0:10:23.080 --> 0:10:25.040
<v Speaker 1>but there's many more to go. It's sort of like

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:29.560
<v Speaker 1>whack a mole, all right, Bloomberg, Smart German, thank you

0:10:29.880 --> 0:10:33.359
<v Speaker 1>for sharing your insights there with us. Whack a mole. Indeed, Okay,

0:10:33.520 --> 0:10:37.480
<v Speaker 1>Shares of Canoe starring at one point doubling in value

0:10:37.520 --> 0:10:40.480
<v Speaker 1>in Tuesday's session. This after the struggling Electric Vehicles startup

0:10:40.520 --> 0:10:46.160
<v Speaker 1>one an order for vans from Walmart. Canoe recently moved

0:10:46.200 --> 0:10:49.880
<v Speaker 1>its headquarters to Walmart's hometown of Bentonville, Arkansas. In May,

0:10:50.000 --> 0:10:52.679
<v Speaker 1>the company warned that there was substantial doubt about its

0:10:52.679 --> 0:10:56.520
<v Speaker 1>long term future, but now at least some investors seem

0:10:56.559 --> 0:11:00.560
<v Speaker 1>a little more optimistic coming up. There's been a major

0:11:00.600 --> 0:11:03.120
<v Speaker 1>slowdown in crypto funding this year. We're gonna chat about that,

0:11:03.200 --> 0:11:06.760
<v Speaker 1>with one venture capitalist doubling down with a new team

0:11:06.840 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 1>focused solely on investing in the blockchain, a story we

0:11:32.280 --> 0:11:35.160
<v Speaker 1>continue to watch. Delivery company go Puff is cutting ten

0:11:35.240 --> 0:11:39.000
<v Speaker 1>percent of its workforce and closing dozens of warehouses. This

0:11:39.120 --> 0:11:41.959
<v Speaker 1>an effort to conserve cash as the economy slows down.

0:11:42.320 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 1>The job cuts will effect about people in corporate and

0:11:45.840 --> 0:11:48.800
<v Speaker 1>warehouse jobs in the United States. Go Puff will shut

0:11:48.880 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 1>seventy six warehouses, or about twelve percent of its network. Meantime,

0:11:55.080 --> 0:11:58.439
<v Speaker 1>Lightspeed Venture Partners just raised seven billion dollars four and

0:11:58.880 --> 0:12:03.400
<v Speaker 1>early and grow stage entrepreneurs. The firm also just announced

0:12:03.520 --> 0:12:07.479
<v Speaker 1>light Speed Faction, a new team fully dedicated to blockchain investments.

0:12:07.800 --> 0:12:11.280
<v Speaker 1>Venture capitalists have cooled on crypto recently, with Pitchbook reporting

0:12:11.400 --> 0:12:15.360
<v Speaker 1>a thirty one quarterly decline in crypto investments through June.

0:12:15.800 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 1>Bajel so Maya is a partner at light Speed Venture

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:22.200
<v Speaker 1>Partners and joins us now from New Delhi. So, obviously

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:26.480
<v Speaker 1>you just raised seven billion new dollars in fresh venture capital.

0:12:26.760 --> 0:12:29.600
<v Speaker 1>You know, talk to us about the process of raising

0:12:29.600 --> 0:12:36.440
<v Speaker 1>this funding, especially in a very very difficult macro environment. Yeah, thanks, Emily. Well,

0:12:36.520 --> 0:12:39.199
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think getting getting this done is really

0:12:39.240 --> 0:12:43.000
<v Speaker 1>a reflection of the strength of the franchise and and

0:12:43.040 --> 0:12:45.280
<v Speaker 1>really the quality of founders that we've been fortunate to

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:49.280
<v Speaker 1>work with, and an LP base that sophisticated and has

0:12:49.840 --> 0:12:53.240
<v Speaker 1>seen through multiple cycles, is very committed to the asset class.

0:12:53.920 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 1>And so we're really fortunate to have raised this capital

0:12:56.400 --> 0:12:59.400
<v Speaker 1>at a time that I think we'll hopefully prove to

0:12:59.440 --> 0:13:03.439
<v Speaker 1>be a really good vintage for for venture and for

0:13:04.000 --> 0:13:06.440
<v Speaker 1>founders at a building for the next seven to ten years.

0:13:07.240 --> 0:13:08.960
<v Speaker 1>So where are you plan to deploy this and how

0:13:09.000 --> 0:13:15.080
<v Speaker 1>fast given these tumultuous market conditions. Yeah, we typically target

0:13:15.600 --> 0:13:19.400
<v Speaker 1>a three year new investment period for our funds, Emily,

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:22.920
<v Speaker 1>And you know, one of the reasons for the scale

0:13:22.920 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 1>of this capital bases over the last twenty years really

0:13:25.480 --> 0:13:30.640
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand. Light Speed believed that innovation and technology

0:13:30.720 --> 0:13:33.599
<v Speaker 1>entrepreneurship would be a global phenomenon, and it was a

0:13:33.679 --> 0:13:36.280
<v Speaker 1>little bit contrary at that time, but as a result,

0:13:36.800 --> 0:13:39.840
<v Speaker 1>the firm has built a presence. Today we have seventy

0:13:39.840 --> 0:13:44.760
<v Speaker 1>investors across twelve offices in six countries, and so there's

0:13:44.760 --> 0:13:48.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of opportunity globally. UM. The scope of the

0:13:48.320 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 1>sectors that we invest in has also increased now with

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:58.520
<v Speaker 1>with pharma and biotech in addition to enterprise, consumer, fintech, crypto,

0:13:58.840 --> 0:14:01.600
<v Speaker 1>UM and the growth practice, and so I think we're

0:14:01.600 --> 0:14:06.040
<v Speaker 1>seeing a lot of opportunity in these areas. Undoubtedly, the

0:14:06.080 --> 0:14:08.720
<v Speaker 1>market for growth is going to be is already slow

0:14:08.760 --> 0:14:12.000
<v Speaker 1>and we think will remain that way, but but we'll

0:14:12.040 --> 0:14:15.400
<v Speaker 1>be patient. So talk to us about the global trends

0:14:15.400 --> 0:14:19.920
<v Speaker 1>you're seeing. For example, how are you seeing the you know,

0:14:20.160 --> 0:14:24.240
<v Speaker 1>slow down impact to startups in India? Is it similar

0:14:24.320 --> 0:14:26.520
<v Speaker 1>to what we're seeing here in the United States, or

0:14:27.240 --> 0:14:29.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, are these macro conditions playing out differently around

0:14:29.840 --> 0:14:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the globe. Yeah, it's a really interesting question. I think

0:14:32.840 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>what we see is the macro conditions actually play out

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:39.920
<v Speaker 1>differently across sectors and differently across countries. So, for example,

0:14:39.960 --> 0:14:44.160
<v Speaker 1>even within the US consumer has seen some impact really

0:14:44.200 --> 0:14:49.800
<v Speaker 1>early on enterprise, not just yet. Obviously, sectors like pharmland

0:14:49.800 --> 0:14:54.120
<v Speaker 1>biotech will have very different dynamics somewhat similar with countries.

0:14:54.200 --> 0:14:56.480
<v Speaker 1>You know, in India, for example, I don't think we're

0:14:56.520 --> 0:14:59.280
<v Speaker 1>going to see a recession. The country is growing at

0:14:59.280 --> 0:15:02.880
<v Speaker 1>about seven a half percent UM. But what we are seeing,

0:15:02.920 --> 0:15:05.320
<v Speaker 1>and and we've been used to inflation again in the

0:15:05.400 --> 0:15:09.240
<v Speaker 1>high single digit UM figures, and and the central bank

0:15:09.360 --> 0:15:12.800
<v Speaker 1>is somewhat used to managing that level of inflation. But

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 1>what we are seeing is is an outflow of foreign investment,

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:20.280
<v Speaker 1>as capital moves out of what have perceived as risk

0:15:20.320 --> 0:15:23.600
<v Speaker 1>your countries and emerging markets, and that has an impact

0:15:24.040 --> 0:15:28.440
<v Speaker 1>on the financing environment. Four startups more so right now

0:15:28.480 --> 0:15:32.160
<v Speaker 1>than the macro's light speeds, invested in thirty some companies

0:15:32.240 --> 0:15:34.160
<v Speaker 1>that are now public companies. How long do you think

0:15:34.160 --> 0:15:37.600
<v Speaker 1>this downturn lasts? When does the I p O window reopen?

0:15:37.640 --> 0:15:40.320
<v Speaker 1>We have thirty seconds. I wish we had a crystal ball.

0:15:40.400 --> 0:15:43.960
<v Speaker 1>Feels like it's gonna be longer than the previous downturns

0:15:44.160 --> 0:15:47.920
<v Speaker 1>given the multitude of factors that play emily, So you

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:53.960
<v Speaker 1>know we're thinking certainly well into interesting. All right, Bajel Somya,

0:15:54.080 --> 0:15:56.000
<v Speaker 1>thank you for joining us. I know it's a very

0:15:56.040 --> 0:15:59.200
<v Speaker 1>early morning for you there in New Delhi. Appreciate you

0:15:59.640 --> 0:16:11.280
<v Speaker 1>wake up. Light Speed Venture Partners will keep watching. Welcome

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:13.400
<v Speaker 1>back to Bark Technology, Emily Changing in San Francisco. I

0:16:13.480 --> 0:16:15.120
<v Speaker 1>want to get back to the latest on Twitter and

0:16:15.160 --> 0:16:18.000
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk. In the last hour, Twitter has sued Musk

0:16:18.080 --> 0:16:20.680
<v Speaker 1>and moved to force the world, which is man to

0:16:20.680 --> 0:16:23.920
<v Speaker 1>consummate is proposed forty four billion dollar buyout of the

0:16:23.960 --> 0:16:26.920
<v Speaker 1>social media platform. Are at Ludlow back here with the headline.

0:16:26.960 --> 0:16:29.480
<v Speaker 1>So we've read some of the fine print. Now what

0:16:29.560 --> 0:16:32.120
<v Speaker 1>is Twitter arguing in this fine Yeah, they're basically saying

0:16:32.200 --> 0:16:34.000
<v Speaker 1>Musk does not have a right to walk away to

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:36.560
<v Speaker 1>an agreement that had very few conditions. They're saying he

0:16:36.600 --> 0:16:38.920
<v Speaker 1>agreed to fifty four dollars twenty cents to share forty

0:16:38.960 --> 0:16:41.960
<v Speaker 1>four billion dollar takeover and that he can't walk away.

0:16:42.000 --> 0:16:43.720
<v Speaker 1>We have this quote from the court fighting we can

0:16:43.720 --> 0:16:46.920
<v Speaker 1>bring up on screen. Musk apparently believes that he, unlike

0:16:47.000 --> 0:16:50.000
<v Speaker 1>every other party subject of Delaware contract law, is free

0:16:50.040 --> 0:16:53.000
<v Speaker 1>to change his mind trash the company disrupt its operations,

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:55.920
<v Speaker 1>destroy stockholder value, and walk away in twitters basically pointing

0:16:55.920 --> 0:16:59.480
<v Speaker 1>out words fighting words and just because the stocks generally

0:16:59.480 --> 0:17:01.520
<v Speaker 1>have fallen down in the sector, including social media socks,

0:17:01.520 --> 0:17:04.080
<v Speaker 1>he can't just have buyer's remorse is their basic arguments.

0:17:04.119 --> 0:17:07.720
<v Speaker 1>So does Twitter have a case or who is better? Right?

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:10.600
<v Speaker 1>So most lawyers that were spoken to a Boomberg think

0:17:10.640 --> 0:17:13.520
<v Speaker 1>that Twitter do. It comes down to material adverse effect.

0:17:13.680 --> 0:17:17.120
<v Speaker 1>Must's argument is that there wasn't enough information handed over

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:19.040
<v Speaker 1>on bots, and this is where the court case is

0:17:19.080 --> 0:17:20.879
<v Speaker 1>going to be fought. Did they or did they not

0:17:20.960 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>share enough data? Material adverse effect? Meaning did them withholding

0:17:24.680 --> 0:17:26.639
<v Speaker 1>data on bots or not sharing enough or what they

0:17:26.680 --> 0:17:28.760
<v Speaker 1>did share actually alter the value of the deal, and

0:17:28.800 --> 0:17:31.440
<v Speaker 1>if it did, the musque could win. But I think

0:17:31.480 --> 0:17:33.600
<v Speaker 1>most lawyers would see Twitter has a good chance here.

0:17:33.840 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 1>All right, thank you for meantime. Sequoia Capital may have

0:17:38.680 --> 0:17:41.480
<v Speaker 1>a million dollars for your idea the story. Adventure capital

0:17:41.480 --> 0:17:45.159
<v Speaker 1>firm is now accepting applications for its deed stage catalysts

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 1>called ARC. They say they're looking to fund outlier founders

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:51.760
<v Speaker 1>and teach them how to make their ideas a reality.

0:17:51.840 --> 0:17:54.239
<v Speaker 1>Justly as a partner at Sequoia Capital and joins us

0:17:54.240 --> 0:17:56.439
<v Speaker 1>now to tell us more. Just great to have you

0:17:56.560 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 1>with us. So walk us through the vision for ARC

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:01.440
<v Speaker 1>and how you think this sets apart what Sequoia is

0:18:01.480 --> 0:18:05.440
<v Speaker 1>trying to do here. Thanks for having the Emily. ARC

0:18:05.520 --> 0:18:08.439
<v Speaker 1>is Sequoia's new seed stage catalyst for outlier founders. We

0:18:08.480 --> 0:18:11.840
<v Speaker 1>offer three things. A million dollar investment from Sequoia as

0:18:11.880 --> 0:18:15.440
<v Speaker 1>well as seven weeks of programming on foundational company building topics.

0:18:15.720 --> 0:18:19.040
<v Speaker 1>And you're working alongside a cohort, a community of really

0:18:19.080 --> 0:18:22.240
<v Speaker 1>exceptional people around at the same stage as you. Um.

0:18:22.240 --> 0:18:24.000
<v Speaker 1>The reason we're doing this is we know it takes

0:18:24.040 --> 0:18:26.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot more than just money to create a category

0:18:26.240 --> 0:18:29.320
<v Speaker 1>defining company, and we know founders want company building help

0:18:29.440 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 1>and Sequoia has had the privilege of working for over

0:18:31.840 --> 0:18:34.400
<v Speaker 1>fifty years with some of the best founders. We've tried

0:18:34.440 --> 0:18:37.160
<v Speaker 1>to do is take all those lessons, all those mistakes,

0:18:37.720 --> 0:18:40.399
<v Speaker 1>the journey of all the other founders that we've worked with,

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:43.840
<v Speaker 1>and boiled them down into foundational company building concepts, everything

0:18:43.920 --> 0:18:47.760
<v Speaker 1>from product to customer obsession to culture to how to hire.

0:18:48.280 --> 0:18:51.520
<v Speaker 1>And so that's the seven weeks of of Jampack programming

0:18:51.520 --> 0:18:56.200
<v Speaker 1>for arc what you can outlier founder and right abbligations

0:18:56.200 --> 0:19:00.960
<v Speaker 1>are open now until July. That's right, all right, so

0:19:01.000 --> 0:19:02.560
<v Speaker 1>you've got a few more days. So when you say

0:19:02.560 --> 0:19:05.239
<v Speaker 1>outlier founders, what exactly do you mean? Sekoia has done

0:19:05.280 --> 0:19:07.800
<v Speaker 1>a lot of really innovative things in the past, for example,

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:11.120
<v Speaker 1>your Scout program to try to find you know, unearthed

0:19:11.119 --> 0:19:13.840
<v Speaker 1>new entrepreneurs and new ideas. You know, why do you

0:19:13.840 --> 0:19:15.879
<v Speaker 1>think you need to do this as well to find

0:19:15.920 --> 0:19:21.000
<v Speaker 1>those outliers? Hm? You know, the venture market has been

0:19:21.000 --> 0:19:24.280
<v Speaker 1>continuously evolving over the years, and I think there are

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:27.240
<v Speaker 1>a lot more founders coming into the space as investors

0:19:27.440 --> 0:19:30.960
<v Speaker 1>and a lot more product thinking and innovation. What can

0:19:31.000 --> 0:19:35.199
<v Speaker 1>affirm offer beyond money which is actually a commodity and

0:19:35.240 --> 0:19:37.280
<v Speaker 1>a board member? And so we often think about what

0:19:37.359 --> 0:19:40.000
<v Speaker 1>do founders need? There are customers, how we work backwards

0:19:40.000 --> 0:19:41.960
<v Speaker 1>from that and figure out what they need help with

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:43.960
<v Speaker 1>and the number one request we get and the number

0:19:43.960 --> 0:19:47.200
<v Speaker 1>one thing I think Sequoia delivers is help with actual

0:19:47.240 --> 0:19:50.480
<v Speaker 1>company building. And so we really tried to boil down

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:53.080
<v Speaker 1>everything that we've learned over the years through working with

0:19:53.119 --> 0:19:55.760
<v Speaker 1>some of the best into the core things that you

0:19:55.840 --> 0:19:58.639
<v Speaker 1>kind of for example, when I was a founder. There

0:19:58.640 --> 0:20:00.320
<v Speaker 1>are things I wish I could have one back in

0:20:00.400 --> 0:20:02.680
<v Speaker 1>time and told my younger self about how to run

0:20:02.680 --> 0:20:06.240
<v Speaker 1>a company. That is a lot of what ARC teaches. Now,

0:20:06.280 --> 0:20:09.639
<v Speaker 1>every company gets a million dollars, what is Sequoia's stake

0:20:09.920 --> 0:20:14.239
<v Speaker 1>and what is the chance for follow on funding? Uh?

0:20:14.359 --> 0:20:17.720
<v Speaker 1>So the it varies from a company to company where work.

0:20:17.800 --> 0:20:20.720
<v Speaker 1>Some are precede to people with an idea uh and

0:20:20.760 --> 0:20:23.160
<v Speaker 1>then some are actually a little bit further along and

0:20:23.200 --> 0:20:25.760
<v Speaker 1>we put one million dollars into their existing seed round

0:20:25.760 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 1>that maybe they've already rang a race. So it's it's

0:20:27.640 --> 0:20:30.520
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of a range, um. But the focus

0:20:30.560 --> 0:20:34.000
<v Speaker 1>is really on the how to build an enduring company,

0:20:34.000 --> 0:20:36.879
<v Speaker 1>a company that lasts for decades, not just you know,

0:20:36.880 --> 0:20:38.239
<v Speaker 1>how to get to the next quarter or the next

0:20:38.280 --> 0:20:41.000
<v Speaker 1>fundraising milestone. Um. So there's a little bit of of

0:20:41.080 --> 0:20:45.639
<v Speaker 1>a range. So, given this very tumultuous macro environment that

0:20:45.640 --> 0:20:48.400
<v Speaker 1>we now find ourselves in, how is that changing what

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 1>you're looking for, what you're looking to fund at the

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:53.760
<v Speaker 1>stage stage or the early stage or the growth stage.

0:20:53.760 --> 0:20:58.040
<v Speaker 1>I mean, Sequoia really runs the gamut. Yeah, I would

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:03.320
<v Speaker 1>say that we've seen um multiple compression and valuations come down.

0:21:04.240 --> 0:21:07.280
<v Speaker 1>I don't think we've seen earnings compression yet, and really

0:21:07.640 --> 0:21:09.920
<v Speaker 1>I think consumers are feeling poorer and that's going to

0:21:10.000 --> 0:21:12.560
<v Speaker 1>trickle down into the way people spend, in the behavior

0:21:12.720 --> 0:21:16.119
<v Speaker 1>of UM buyers, both on the consumer side and the

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:20.119
<v Speaker 1>enterprise side. That said, Sequoia has been designed to outlast

0:21:20.280 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 1>the cycles in the tech industry. The purposes of our

0:21:23.119 --> 0:21:26.280
<v Speaker 1>firm is to look beyond those short term fluctuations, and

0:21:26.320 --> 0:21:29.480
<v Speaker 1>so we're looking for the same thing we were looking

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:34.359
<v Speaker 1>for before, which is founders that have a unique insight,

0:21:35.119 --> 0:21:37.440
<v Speaker 1>who have a lot of grit to endure these ups

0:21:37.480 --> 0:21:39.680
<v Speaker 1>and downs, as well as just the difficult journey of

0:21:39.680 --> 0:21:42.960
<v Speaker 1>of starting a company. And we're looking for large markets

0:21:43.000 --> 0:21:44.919
<v Speaker 1>where you think you can build almost like define a

0:21:44.960 --> 0:21:48.399
<v Speaker 1>category from scratch, create a new one. What does Sequoias

0:21:48.480 --> 0:21:51.240
<v Speaker 1>read on the macro environment right now and how bad

0:21:51.320 --> 0:21:55.119
<v Speaker 1>this will be for tech? I don't have a crystal ball.

0:21:55.440 --> 0:21:59.040
<v Speaker 1>That said, I do think that, like I said, we've

0:21:59.119 --> 0:22:02.959
<v Speaker 1>just started to see multiple compression and not yet earnings compression.

0:22:02.960 --> 0:22:07.680
<v Speaker 1>I really think people are um. You know, we basically

0:22:08.200 --> 0:22:12.399
<v Speaker 1>the public market has returned to historical valuations, the revenue multiples,

0:22:12.800 --> 0:22:16.119
<v Speaker 1>but earnings have not. I don't think we've seen the

0:22:16.160 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 1>full impact of consumers feeling while gas is really expensive,

0:22:20.520 --> 0:22:23.679
<v Speaker 1>my company had layoffs. I can't buy as much enterprise software,

0:22:23.680 --> 0:22:26.320
<v Speaker 1>so I think that may still becoming. That's what we've

0:22:26.320 --> 0:22:29.960
<v Speaker 1>been forecasting for our founders. We called in all hands

0:22:30.040 --> 0:22:32.439
<v Speaker 1>recently where we we gathered all of our founders and

0:22:32.440 --> 0:22:34.119
<v Speaker 1>we walked them through what we were seeing in the market,

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:38.000
<v Speaker 1>as well as how to think about forecasting, financial planning,

0:22:38.040 --> 0:22:41.000
<v Speaker 1>and how to lead in uncertain times. So that's that's

0:22:41.040 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 1>what we expect. As for how founders should react, that

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:46.320
<v Speaker 1>really depends. It's on a case by case basis. Some

0:22:46.440 --> 0:22:48.480
<v Speaker 1>founders are in a great cash position and should be

0:22:48.520 --> 0:22:51.960
<v Speaker 1>leaning in very aggressively. What we see in these down

0:22:52.000 --> 0:22:55.480
<v Speaker 1>cycles tends to be that hiring freezes everyone sort of

0:22:55.760 --> 0:22:59.920
<v Speaker 1>pauses and reflects, and it actually becomes easier to get

0:23:00.119 --> 0:23:04.000
<v Speaker 1>higher concentration of talent versus before you were competing with

0:23:04.080 --> 0:23:07.119
<v Speaker 1>the fang companies with every single startup seed stage, everyone

0:23:07.280 --> 0:23:10.679
<v Speaker 1>was hiring and and now I think for the mission

0:23:10.760 --> 0:23:15.600
<v Speaker 1>driven for the people who are venturing out of jobs, now, uh,

0:23:15.640 --> 0:23:19.280
<v Speaker 1>it's actually possible to to get a greater concentration of talent,

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:21.440
<v Speaker 1>and then some folks are in a not so great

0:23:21.520 --> 0:23:24.120
<v Speaker 1>cash position and may need to take more drastic action.

0:23:24.160 --> 0:23:25.639
<v Speaker 1>But it's really case by case, and so we walk

0:23:25.680 --> 0:23:28.560
<v Speaker 1>our founders through all of that. Sequoia is famous for

0:23:28.640 --> 0:23:32.200
<v Speaker 1>its R I P. Good Times message, which you gave

0:23:32.240 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 1>to entrepreneurs in two thousand and eight, the height of

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:37.320
<v Speaker 1>the financial crisis. What's the headline of the presentation today

0:23:37.359 --> 0:23:40.639
<v Speaker 1>or what would it be today? It was called adapting

0:23:40.720 --> 0:23:43.960
<v Speaker 1>to Endure. It was about how to build those long term,

0:23:44.040 --> 0:23:47.480
<v Speaker 1>enduring companies, how to outlive the cycle. The founder of Sequoia,

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:51.200
<v Speaker 1>Don Valentine, he he had a license plate that said

0:23:51.280 --> 0:23:53.880
<v Speaker 1>varoked on it, which is the German word for crazy

0:23:54.520 --> 0:23:57.600
<v Speaker 1>or insane, and he, you know, some of the wisdom

0:23:57.640 --> 0:23:59.639
<v Speaker 1>that gets passed down from him as well as to

0:24:00.000 --> 0:24:03.240
<v Speaker 1>regeneral throughout the partnership has been that tech moves in

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:06.439
<v Speaker 1>these cycles, um their four phases. The first, well, the

0:24:06.480 --> 0:24:09.119
<v Speaker 1>one we were just in, was called varoked. It is

0:24:09.160 --> 0:24:13.040
<v Speaker 1>the hype, the excess, the the high multiples like parties,

0:24:13.119 --> 0:24:17.200
<v Speaker 1>you know when lambeau and then there's a correction, quite

0:24:17.200 --> 0:24:20.440
<v Speaker 1>sharp correction where people tend tend to freeze and then uh,

0:24:20.480 --> 0:24:23.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, of course correction and then it slowly comes back,

0:24:23.240 --> 0:24:25.720
<v Speaker 1>and then it happens all over again. That's sort of

0:24:25.760 --> 0:24:28.520
<v Speaker 1>what we've been seeing play out over over decades. It

0:24:28.640 --> 0:24:31.240
<v Speaker 1>is compressed in certain industries like crypto. I would say

0:24:31.240 --> 0:24:34.119
<v Speaker 1>the twelve year bull market becomes a four year bull market.

0:24:34.840 --> 0:24:38.399
<v Speaker 1>But the best companies are often formed in that correction phase.

0:24:38.520 --> 0:24:41.639
<v Speaker 1>It's the founders who really our mission driven. They want

0:24:41.680 --> 0:24:44.200
<v Speaker 1>to start their company no matter what they're they're they're courageous,

0:24:44.200 --> 0:24:46.199
<v Speaker 1>they're brave, they have the grit to alice that they

0:24:46.200 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 1>can get that concentration of great talent uh and they

0:24:49.400 --> 0:24:51.960
<v Speaker 1>have fewer competitors. So we believe at Tekoia that now

0:24:52.040 --> 0:24:53.560
<v Speaker 1>is a great time to start a company, and that's

0:24:53.560 --> 0:24:56.879
<v Speaker 1>why we launched an mark now last year. Sekoia made

0:24:56.920 --> 0:24:59.160
<v Speaker 1>a big break with tradition to do away with traditional

0:24:59.240 --> 0:25:02.800
<v Speaker 1>venture capital timelines and in some cases keep money invested

0:25:02.840 --> 0:25:06.879
<v Speaker 1>longer in companies your portfolio companies going public. Some of

0:25:06.880 --> 0:25:11.159
<v Speaker 1>these companies have had a tough time in the public markets. Airbnb, Door, Dash,

0:25:11.600 --> 0:25:15.760
<v Speaker 1>robin Hood. Is that strategy evolving at all given these

0:25:15.760 --> 0:25:19.760
<v Speaker 1>tumultuous chimes and our LPs reacting at all are asking

0:25:19.800 --> 0:25:24.040
<v Speaker 1>for their money back or out sooner. So the purpose

0:25:24.040 --> 0:25:26.560
<v Speaker 1>of the Sequoia Capital Fund was actually to look beyond

0:25:26.600 --> 0:25:29.960
<v Speaker 1>those short term fluctuations. It allows us to be the

0:25:30.080 --> 0:25:34.320
<v Speaker 1>long term partner, the the shareholder, the long term partner,

0:25:34.520 --> 0:25:37.520
<v Speaker 1>the you know, we don't have to immediately distribute after

0:25:37.560 --> 0:25:39.359
<v Speaker 1>the I p O to lock in some return for

0:25:39.400 --> 0:25:43.000
<v Speaker 1>our LPs. It also actually lets this generate superior returns

0:25:43.080 --> 0:25:46.040
<v Speaker 1>for our LPs. We get to capture the compounding values.

0:25:46.080 --> 0:25:50.919
<v Speaker 1>Some of the best companies Google, Cisco, Airbnb, the companies

0:25:50.920 --> 0:25:53.080
<v Speaker 1>we had the privilege of working with for for a

0:25:53.119 --> 0:25:57.280
<v Speaker 1>long time. We have a lot of information about how

0:25:57.320 --> 0:26:01.000
<v Speaker 1>well they're doing and the real like what those founders

0:26:01.000 --> 0:26:03.080
<v Speaker 1>are truly like, and so we think we're in a

0:26:03.119 --> 0:26:05.960
<v Speaker 1>better position to manage some of the distributions for LPs.

0:26:06.000 --> 0:26:07.840
<v Speaker 1>And the founders really love that that we are that

0:26:07.920 --> 0:26:11.680
<v Speaker 1>long term partner. So the strategy has not changed. Okay, um,

0:26:11.760 --> 0:26:13.160
<v Speaker 1>now I have to ask you. You're on the board

0:26:13.160 --> 0:26:15.320
<v Speaker 1>of all Rays. You mentioned your a founder yourself. There's

0:26:15.359 --> 0:26:18.840
<v Speaker 1>been a lot of concerns about women backsliding in the pandemic,

0:26:18.920 --> 0:26:22.480
<v Speaker 1>and I wonder if those concerns continue. Uh, if there's

0:26:22.480 --> 0:26:25.960
<v Speaker 1>concerned about women backsliding in a downturn. Yeah, this is

0:26:26.000 --> 0:26:28.679
<v Speaker 1>a deeply personal issue for me. I was a female

0:26:28.720 --> 0:26:33.560
<v Speaker 1>founder I UM was working on a product targeted at women,

0:26:33.880 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 1>and it was very hard to fundraise. I never pitched

0:26:36.840 --> 0:26:39.520
<v Speaker 1>a single woman investor, and I made the connection. I

0:26:39.560 --> 0:26:44.399
<v Speaker 1>realized that the complexion of who makes funding decisions affects

0:26:45.119 --> 0:26:47.879
<v Speaker 1>what problems and what customers get served in the world

0:26:47.880 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 1>by the tech industry. That's part of what motivated me

0:26:50.160 --> 0:26:52.400
<v Speaker 1>to move to venture and to co found All Rays

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:57.200
<v Speaker 1>alongside thirty other amazing women inventure and female founders. Certainly,

0:26:57.240 --> 0:27:01.679
<v Speaker 1>the percentage of women writers at VC firms has gone up.

0:27:01.720 --> 0:27:04.600
<v Speaker 1>I think it's moved from nine to in the last

0:27:04.720 --> 0:27:07.480
<v Speaker 1>four years. There are some steps forward, However, there are

0:27:07.520 --> 0:27:10.520
<v Speaker 1>also some steps back overall for women in this country.

0:27:10.560 --> 0:27:13.080
<v Speaker 1>I think, you know, the overturning of Roe v. Wade

0:27:13.240 --> 0:27:17.199
<v Speaker 1>is a tragic step backwards. I think a lot is

0:27:17.200 --> 0:27:21.200
<v Speaker 1>going to fall on the tech industry, on innovative founders,

0:27:21.400 --> 0:27:24.520
<v Speaker 1>on employers to help move the ball forward for women.

0:27:24.640 --> 0:27:27.840
<v Speaker 1>All right, Well, appreciate you sharing your thoughts on all

0:27:27.880 --> 0:27:30.040
<v Speaker 1>of that with us. Obviously, you have a very long

0:27:30.080 --> 0:27:33.960
<v Speaker 1>history in this industry. Um Sequoia Capitals. J Lee Chess.

0:27:33.960 --> 0:27:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Great to have you with us. All right, coming up,

0:27:36.080 --> 0:27:39.280
<v Speaker 1>bitcoin miners feeling that heat with a Texas power grid

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:41.560
<v Speaker 1>near the brink. We're going to talk about the impact

0:27:41.680 --> 0:27:43.760
<v Speaker 1>of the heat wave in the Lone Star state that

0:27:43.800 --> 0:27:47.439
<v Speaker 1>has become a hub for digital assets. That's next. This

0:27:47.520 --> 0:28:04.080
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg time now for our crypto report. Joining me now,

0:28:04.119 --> 0:28:07.480
<v Speaker 1>Blue or Shannali Bostic in the middle of crypto winter, Shanale.

0:28:07.480 --> 0:28:11.520
<v Speaker 1>Of course, we've been talking about startup funding for crypto

0:28:11.680 --> 0:28:15.600
<v Speaker 1>falling off. You know, talk to us about the where

0:28:15.640 --> 0:28:17.480
<v Speaker 1>the tide is going here? Yeah, I think about the

0:28:17.560 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 1>massive disconnector seeing here. Emily, it's you. You have billions

0:28:20.800 --> 0:28:23.160
<v Speaker 1>of dollars, ten billions of dollars in the first quarter

0:28:23.200 --> 0:28:26.119
<v Speaker 1>a loan raised for venture capital in the crypto space.

0:28:26.359 --> 0:28:29.200
<v Speaker 1>But the funding of the startups themselves has really fallen off,

0:28:29.240 --> 0:28:31.000
<v Speaker 1>and you really started to see that in the second

0:28:31.080 --> 0:28:34.600
<v Speaker 1>quarter of this year, where funding dropped by thirty one

0:28:34.600 --> 0:28:37.920
<v Speaker 1>percent according to pitchbook data. There were some venture capitalists

0:28:37.920 --> 0:28:40.200
<v Speaker 1>that spoke to Bloomberg that gave more specifics on what

0:28:40.240 --> 0:28:42.840
<v Speaker 1>that looks like at the seed stage. It's not as

0:28:42.920 --> 0:28:44.920
<v Speaker 1>dramatic of a drop, but as you're starting to get

0:28:44.960 --> 0:28:47.480
<v Speaker 1>into Series A and later rounds, you could see a

0:28:47.520 --> 0:28:50.600
<v Speaker 1>fifty or seventy percent drop in valuations, which is what

0:28:50.760 --> 0:28:54.520
<v Speaker 1>is making venture capitalists so nervous here. You don't want

0:28:54.560 --> 0:28:57.160
<v Speaker 1>to catch a falling knife. So until you see a

0:28:57.200 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 1>little bit more stabilization in the industry in terms of

0:29:00.080 --> 0:29:02.800
<v Speaker 1>or prices will go as well as a shakeout here

0:29:02.960 --> 0:29:04.960
<v Speaker 1>in terms of the tens of projects that will make

0:29:04.960 --> 0:29:07.000
<v Speaker 1>it through the cycle, it's going to be hard to

0:29:07.000 --> 0:29:09.480
<v Speaker 1>see tons of money being put to work that we

0:29:09.520 --> 0:29:13.000
<v Speaker 1>are seeing some high profile names still being funded. I

0:29:13.040 --> 0:29:15.080
<v Speaker 1>know you and I, for example, spoke to Magic Eden

0:29:15.320 --> 0:29:18.120
<v Speaker 1>an n f T marketplace just weeks ago. But again

0:29:18.160 --> 0:29:20.440
<v Speaker 1>these are one off situations and not the norm in

0:29:20.480 --> 0:29:23.600
<v Speaker 1>this environment. How easy is it gonna be to spend

0:29:23.640 --> 0:29:26.080
<v Speaker 1>this money that that these venture capital funds have raised,

0:29:26.080 --> 0:29:28.680
<v Speaker 1>Andrews and Narrow, it's Katie Han. We're just talking to

0:29:28.760 --> 0:29:31.160
<v Speaker 1>Jess Leave from so Koya. Are they gonna be able

0:29:31.160 --> 0:29:33.920
<v Speaker 1>to put all the money they raised it's a fund

0:29:33.960 --> 0:29:36.280
<v Speaker 1>crypto to work. Yeah, it's a great question because you

0:29:36.320 --> 0:29:39.360
<v Speaker 1>have to see if the definitional definition of crypto will

0:29:39.440 --> 0:29:42.000
<v Speaker 1>change by any means, are you going to start to

0:29:42.040 --> 0:29:44.800
<v Speaker 1>put money towards projects that are so Lana based or

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:46.720
<v Speaker 1>are you going to put money towards projects that are

0:29:46.720 --> 0:29:49.840
<v Speaker 1>more Web three based. You see gaming and crypto become

0:29:49.880 --> 0:29:54.640
<v Speaker 1>a very popular popular environment here, so you can maybe

0:29:54.680 --> 0:29:58.360
<v Speaker 1>see things start to change in terms of definitions of crypto.

0:29:58.400 --> 0:30:00.880
<v Speaker 1>But again we're looking at the price the bitcoin. Bitcoin

0:30:01.000 --> 0:30:05.200
<v Speaker 1>is of course still king here Emily. When do prices stabilize?

0:30:05.520 --> 0:30:08.120
<v Speaker 1>Until that happens, it's hard to see massive amounts but

0:30:08.160 --> 0:30:13.200
<v Speaker 1>to work all right, Shannali Bask, thank you for that update.

0:30:23.040 --> 0:30:25.280
<v Speaker 1>Over five hundred of the top CEOs in the United

0:30:25.320 --> 0:30:27.840
<v Speaker 1>States have joined an effort by code dot org urging

0:30:27.880 --> 0:30:31.520
<v Speaker 1>governors and state education officials to ensure that all US

0:30:31.600 --> 0:30:34.040
<v Speaker 1>and elementary and high school students have the chance to

0:30:34.160 --> 0:30:37.320
<v Speaker 1>study computer science. This comes as demand for talent to

0:30:37.360 --> 0:30:42.120
<v Speaker 1>fill jobs in cybersecurity, data science, computer programming has skyrocketed.

0:30:42.440 --> 0:30:44.959
<v Speaker 1>Many of those jobs are unfilled. Joining us for this

0:30:45.080 --> 0:30:48.920
<v Speaker 1>week's Teconomic segment, Hotti part Toby, founder of code dot org,

0:30:49.360 --> 0:30:53.400
<v Speaker 1>also a long time investor, tech entrepreneur yourself, You've been

0:30:53.400 --> 0:30:55.880
<v Speaker 1>doing this now for nine years, nine years trying to

0:30:55.880 --> 0:30:58.680
<v Speaker 1>get computer science taught in schools. How much progress has

0:30:58.720 --> 0:31:01.480
<v Speaker 1>there actually been? One we started ten percent of US

0:31:01.520 --> 0:31:04.760
<v Speaker 1>schools taught computer science. Now it's at fifty one. So

0:31:04.800 --> 0:31:07.040
<v Speaker 1>we've now tipped it. So if you're a parent whose

0:31:07.080 --> 0:31:09.720
<v Speaker 1>school doesn't your child school doesn't teach computer science, you're

0:31:09.720 --> 0:31:11.720
<v Speaker 1>now in the minority. But we still want to get

0:31:11.720 --> 0:31:13.480
<v Speaker 1>to the point where a hundred percent of schools teach

0:31:13.520 --> 0:31:16.120
<v Speaker 1>computer science. And we're also at the point where even

0:31:16.280 --> 0:31:18.440
<v Speaker 1>with all these schools teaching, and only five percent of

0:31:18.520 --> 0:31:21.360
<v Speaker 1>high school students study computer science. And we want to

0:31:21.400 --> 0:31:24.400
<v Speaker 1>reach every kid. So that's the next decade of work,

0:31:24.480 --> 0:31:26.600
<v Speaker 1>is to get to every single student in every school.

0:31:26.600 --> 0:31:29.840
<v Speaker 1>So you've got Mark Zuckerberg, Chryl Sandberg, Jeff Bezos, Sundar Pachai,

0:31:30.000 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 1>and you know hundreds more who have signed this letter.

0:31:32.880 --> 0:31:35.960
<v Speaker 1>What will this letter actually accomplish? Well, the first thing

0:31:35.960 --> 0:31:38.760
<v Speaker 1>I wanted to say is it's it's not surprising to

0:31:38.800 --> 0:31:40.960
<v Speaker 1>see folks like Tim Cook or Bill Gates or Mark

0:31:41.040 --> 0:31:44.479
<v Speaker 1>Zuckerberg saying that schools should teach computer science. What's truly

0:31:44.600 --> 0:31:47.480
<v Speaker 1>unique is the company's outside of the tech sector. The

0:31:47.560 --> 0:31:52.960
<v Speaker 1>leading companies in retail, transportation, finance, even in coffee or

0:31:53.080 --> 0:31:59.920
<v Speaker 1>toys or you know, Starbucks, Nike, has Bro, these companies, Nordstrom's, Ups,

0:32:00.080 --> 0:32:03.120
<v Speaker 1>Walgreens are all getting behind computer science to show that

0:32:03.160 --> 0:32:06.160
<v Speaker 1>computer science is no longer about just jobs of tech

0:32:06.160 --> 0:32:09.520
<v Speaker 1>companies because every company is becoming a tech company. Every

0:32:09.520 --> 0:32:13.840
<v Speaker 1>company has data science needs or cybersecurity needs. So have

0:32:13.960 --> 0:32:16.520
<v Speaker 1>you gotten a response from lawmakers from the people who

0:32:16.520 --> 0:32:19.200
<v Speaker 1>have the you know, capability of changing this, of adding

0:32:19.200 --> 0:32:22.200
<v Speaker 1>this to a school curriculum. We've we have early signs

0:32:22.200 --> 0:32:25.480
<v Speaker 1>the National Governors Association, all fifty governors are actually getting

0:32:25.480 --> 0:32:28.480
<v Speaker 1>together tomorrow and we expect by Thursday that they're going

0:32:28.520 --> 0:32:31.280
<v Speaker 1>to make an announcement on this topic. We don't know

0:32:31.320 --> 0:32:33.360
<v Speaker 1>exactly what it's going to say, but the early signs

0:32:33.360 --> 0:32:35.680
<v Speaker 1>are it's going to be tremendous. I'm hoping to see

0:32:35.680 --> 0:32:40.000
<v Speaker 1>all fifty governors united behind something about computer science because

0:32:40.000 --> 0:32:42.200
<v Speaker 1>this is an issue really that everybody can get behind.

0:32:42.480 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 1>You've shared your story with us here over the years,

0:32:44.520 --> 0:32:46.680
<v Speaker 1>but I want to remind our viewers. You know, you

0:32:46.680 --> 0:32:49.160
<v Speaker 1>grew up in Iran. Your school didn't offer computer science,

0:32:49.280 --> 0:32:52.040
<v Speaker 1>but you were still able to get access to a computer.

0:32:52.160 --> 0:32:56.480
<v Speaker 1>It changed your life. If your school had offered computer science.

0:32:56.520 --> 0:32:58.880
<v Speaker 1>Do you think your life would have been different. Well,

0:32:58.920 --> 0:33:00.960
<v Speaker 1>for me, I had a father who was a physicist

0:33:00.960 --> 0:33:03.360
<v Speaker 1>and a mother who was a computer scientist. So even

0:33:03.400 --> 0:33:06.719
<v Speaker 1>growing up in post revolutionary Iran during the war, I

0:33:06.800 --> 0:33:09.120
<v Speaker 1>was learning to code on my own. But if you

0:33:09.160 --> 0:33:12.160
<v Speaker 1>think about the most underprivileged kids in today's world, the

0:33:12.240 --> 0:33:14.760
<v Speaker 1>kids who are getting left behind, what's the one thing

0:33:14.800 --> 0:33:16.440
<v Speaker 1>we can teach them in school that gives them a

0:33:16.480 --> 0:33:19.400
<v Speaker 1>pathway ahead, or that even just gives them the confidence

0:33:19.440 --> 0:33:21.760
<v Speaker 1>that I can build something, I can make something, I

0:33:21.760 --> 0:33:24.200
<v Speaker 1>can I can change the world. I can be a creator.

0:33:24.640 --> 0:33:27.720
<v Speaker 1>Kids wants to create, and right now they're becoming creators

0:33:27.720 --> 0:33:31.320
<v Speaker 1>on TikTok or Instagram because that's easy. If they knew

0:33:31.320 --> 0:33:33.960
<v Speaker 1>that they could create apps and create software, there's a

0:33:34.000 --> 0:33:36.040
<v Speaker 1>whole world of opportunity that we would open up for

0:33:36.080 --> 0:33:38.720
<v Speaker 1>them as well. There's also the how you know, what

0:33:38.800 --> 0:33:42.080
<v Speaker 1>are schools getting right when they are trying to deliver

0:33:42.120 --> 0:33:44.480
<v Speaker 1>this correct kill them and what are they getting wrong?

0:33:44.520 --> 0:33:48.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I've got multiple children in school, and you

0:33:48.680 --> 0:33:52.520
<v Speaker 1>know there there's there's this thirst for more computer science,

0:33:52.520 --> 0:33:55.480
<v Speaker 1>and I even wonder if they're doing it the right way. Yeah,

0:33:55.480 --> 0:33:57.640
<v Speaker 1>one of the challenges to make sure computer science is

0:33:57.680 --> 0:34:01.280
<v Speaker 1>taught creatively, so it's not just about like learned, learning

0:34:01.320 --> 0:34:03.640
<v Speaker 1>these things and memorizing and passing the task for more

0:34:03.680 --> 0:34:05.280
<v Speaker 1>like what do you want to create? What app do

0:34:05.280 --> 0:34:08.280
<v Speaker 1>you want to create? What game? What? Website? To basically

0:34:08.360 --> 0:34:11.279
<v Speaker 1>draw out the natural creativity, and when it's topped that way,

0:34:11.320 --> 0:34:14.040
<v Speaker 1>it also brings in diversity into the field because more

0:34:14.040 --> 0:34:17.080
<v Speaker 1>students are interested in creating stuff than they are just

0:34:17.160 --> 0:34:18.960
<v Speaker 1>sort of doing wrote work. So how long do you

0:34:19.000 --> 0:34:21.880
<v Speaker 1>think before we get I'm pretty confident that by the

0:34:21.960 --> 0:34:24.080
<v Speaker 1>end of the decade we will because there's now multiple

0:34:24.120 --> 0:34:26.440
<v Speaker 1>states saying that it's going to be required for graduation.

0:34:26.719 --> 0:34:29.880
<v Speaker 1>There's now five states that require computer science for graduation

0:34:29.920 --> 0:34:31.799
<v Speaker 1>from high school. And when you do that, you get

0:34:31.800 --> 0:34:35.120
<v Speaker 1>to you also fix the gender gap, you fix the

0:34:35.239 --> 0:34:38.480
<v Speaker 1>racial equity gap. Every student learned. So this is the

0:34:38.520 --> 0:34:43.160
<v Speaker 1>secret to everything pretty much. Yeah, I mean in South Carolina,

0:34:43.200 --> 0:34:45.840
<v Speaker 1>for example, it's the first state that required computer science

0:34:45.840 --> 0:34:49.000
<v Speaker 1>for graduation. There's now more young women in South Carolina

0:34:49.080 --> 0:34:53.640
<v Speaker 1>learning computer science than the five states surrounding it. Right, Um, well,

0:34:53.680 --> 0:34:57.120
<v Speaker 1>it's been wonderful to see your progress over these nine years. Um,

0:34:57.160 --> 0:34:59.360
<v Speaker 1>and We'll be watching for more. Code dot org founder,

0:34:59.360 --> 0:35:01.440
<v Speaker 1>how do you parto be? Thank you for joining us

0:35:01.440 --> 0:35:04.200
<v Speaker 1>here in the studio that doesn't for the sedition of

0:35:04.280 --> 0:35:07.160
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Technology. We've got a big interview coming up Tomorrow.

0:35:07.239 --> 0:35:10.600
<v Speaker 1>The CEO of IBM, Arvin Krishna, will be with us.

0:35:10.600 --> 0:35:13.040
<v Speaker 1>We're to talk to him about everything from the downturn

0:35:13.120 --> 0:35:15.680
<v Speaker 1>to the supply chain and more. You don't want to

0:35:15.719 --> 0:35:18.440
<v Speaker 1>miss it. I'm Emily Changing in San Francisco. This is

0:35:18.480 --> 0:35:19.040
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg