Speaker 1: Thanks to all of you for being one of this
Speaker 1: hour to Sean Hanneredy's show, Toll Free. It is eight
Speaker 1: hundred and ninety four one sewn if you want to
Speaker 1: be a part of the program. There's a lot of
Speaker 1: articles and we've been following this and we had Nick
Speaker 1: Shirley on and now they've gotten California the Silence Nick
Speaker 1: Shirley Act. You know, it had the unmitigated audacity to
Speaker 1: go out in Minnesota and California and find that places
Speaker 1: that declare themselves to be daycare centers that are taking
Speaker 1: care of thousands of children in fact don't exist. And
Speaker 1: where does this money come from. It comes from all
Speaker 1: of you. And that's money that would otherwise be distributed
Speaker 1: to all of you. Now we've got a new article
Speaker 1: out that came out over the weekend on Foxnews dot com.
Speaker 1: At Newsom and his administration knew about a two billion
Speaker 1: dollar California budget error for months and anyway, Democrats were
Speaker 1: aware of this accounting error, and you know, and a
Speaker 1: plan already that projected, you know, roughly three billion dollar
Speaker 1: deficit in the fiscal year that is upcoming. The mistake
Speaker 1: is made to the state's public employee retirement system. I mean,
Speaker 1: it just never it just never ends. And all of
Speaker 1: this money combined is money that would otherwise be going
Speaker 1: to you and to your family. There has been one
Speaker 1: voice that has been the most articulate, the most informed
Speaker 1: of anybody out there, and that is Meme at Oz.
Speaker 1: He is the seventeenth administrator of the Centers for Medicare
Speaker 1: Medicaid Services. And anyway, he was at this testimony with
Speaker 1: Senator with Secretary Kennedy today and the Secretary testified before
Speaker 1: the House Education Workforce Committee on the Trump administration's policies.
Speaker 1: I mean, and they want to pull this guy off
Speaker 1: in a million different directions. Republicans questioning the Secretary about
Speaker 1: abortion pills, kinder affirming care, rural health care, school tritionan,
Speaker 1: et cetera, et cetera. But when you get to the
Speaker 1: bottom line, as doctor Oz has been reminding us, removing
Speaker 1: healthcare fraud alone would double the life of the Medicare
Speaker 1: Trust Fund. Remember, government says that social Security, Medicare, Medicaid
Speaker 1: on the state level, that all of this is going
Speaker 1: to be available for us, and all of them are
Speaker 1: headed towards insolvency. The lock box for Social Security has
Speaker 1: been long rated. You know, if you look at well,
Speaker 1: all these people that want the government credle to grave,
Speaker 1: womb to the tomb ideology put in place, and everything's
Speaker 1: going to be free, free, free, free free. Well, mom,
Speaker 1: Donnie's not given New York City free buses. But putting
Speaker 1: that aside, how did those Obamacare promises, keep your doctor,
Speaker 1: keep your plan. Average family saved twenty five hundred dollars
Speaker 1: per family a year, Millions lost doctors, millions lost plans,
Speaker 1: and we're now paying about on average, three hundred percent more.
Speaker 1: And what doctor Oz has been saying is some of
Speaker 1: you are worried you won't have Medicare. He said, we
Speaker 1: could double the life expectancy of Medicare and the trust
Speaker 1: Fund if we could get the fraud out of the system.
Speaker 1: And he pointed out that this task force will not
Speaker 1: stop until they accomplish that. Anyway, here's doctor Oz saying,
Speaker 1: removing healthcare fraud would double the trust Fund.
Speaker 2: We put it in context. Folks out there working their
Speaker 2: tails off to get Medicare. Some of you a word,
Speaker 2: you won't have Medicare. That's healthy for you. We would
Speaker 2: double the life expectancy of the Medicare Trust Fund. If
Speaker 2: we could get the fraud out of the system, the President,
Speaker 2: the Vice President, the task force.
Speaker 3: We're not going to stop until we do just that.
Speaker 1: Anyway, Doctor Memdaz joins us. Now, it is remarkable to
Speaker 1: me that we're discovering all of this waste, fraud, abuse
Speaker 1: and corruption, and nobody seems to be that interested on
Speaker 1: Capitol Hill about it. And it infuriates me because we're
Speaker 1: all being stolen from.
Speaker 3: The magnitude of the staft we estimate to be about
Speaker 3: one hundred billion dollars a year. Shot. Think about that,
Speaker 3: one hundred million dollars in folks paying taxes. That's not
Speaker 3: going towards their long term savings in medicare as you
Speaker 3: I pointed out, not helping her most vulnerable, which is
Speaker 3: what Medicaid's all about. When President says he wants to
Speaker 3: love and cherish these programs, that includes protecting them from
Speaker 3: frosters taking advantage of them. And I think part of
Speaker 3: the reason that Capitolill hasn't really caught up is there
Speaker 3: in a bit of a time warp, because it wasn't
Speaker 3: that bad more than five years ago. What happened five
Speaker 3: years ago COVID. COVID taught a lot of fraudsters that
Speaker 3: they could corrupt the American system, whatever system you're talking about.
Speaker 3: It be snap benefits, it could be temporar assistants and
Speaker 3: needy families, could be health benefits. You could defraud the
Speaker 3: American system and take money out of it from COVID benefits,
Speaker 3: for example, and never be caught, never be held accountable.
Speaker 3: None of the elected officials who are sloppily throwing money
Speaker 3: at problems, they wouldn't get caught up in it all.
Speaker 3: And it sort of like sleepily through the prior administration
Speaker 3: went through unnoticed. And I'll just speak Seana, you know
Speaker 3: we're close friends to talk about this, but just for
Speaker 3: everyone out there, I want you to hear this frustration
Speaker 3: in my voice. The prior administry did not want to
Speaker 3: hear from my agency, which is Medicare and Medicaid, and
Speaker 3: we cover one hundred and seventy million people's insurance. They
Speaker 3: did not want to hear from us about corruption or
Speaker 3: fraud or anything else. They just want to know one thing,
Speaker 3: did you sign more people up? And so Sean I
Speaker 3: got thinking like, is this really a flaw or is
Speaker 3: this maybe a feature for some people? Now let's think
Speaker 3: about this. Well, one. You know this already. If you
Speaker 3: sign someone up for Medicaid, you have to also the
Speaker 3: option to sign to vote. You know, that's something that's
Speaker 3: been in statute for many, many years. So that's you know,
Speaker 3: one sort of issue that comes up periodically. But the
Speaker 3: topic that's sort of gotten on my attention more recently
Speaker 3: is the fact that this has become a jobs programs.
Speaker 3: Let's take two states, New York and California. In both
Speaker 3: these states, now you have personal care services which have
Speaker 3: served massively. Now what is the personal care service. It's
Speaker 3: a service that you do for somebody that normally their
Speaker 3: family would offer for them, like driving them to the
Speaker 3: doctor's office, carrying the groceries up the stairs, like simple
Speaker 3: things like that. Not licensed and not done in any
Speaker 3: accredited location. So it's very hard to audit if it
Speaker 3: really happened appropriately in New York State. Now, then number
Speaker 3: one job sewn you lived in New York for a
Speaker 3: long time, The number one job in New York State
Speaker 3: is a personal care assystem. It's not retail. You know,
Speaker 3: all the other things that could be. It's not that.
Speaker 3: It's personal care service. And this system is also, by
Speaker 3: the way, it's a big problem in California where they
Speaker 3: have even more personal care service providers. The problem done
Speaker 3: becomes gay now that you've gotten all these new jobs
Speaker 3: created ostensibly that you think these are jobs on Wall Street,
Speaker 3: they're not. They're someone carrying groceries up the stairs. Maybe
Speaker 3: it's their parents they're carrying the groceries for. Then the
Speaker 3: question becomes, is there an additional layer of corruption? And
Speaker 3: we're hearing more and more about the possibility that unions.
Speaker 3: You're getting involved and when you unionize, this is a
Speaker 3: massive amount of people to bring into a union. That
Speaker 3: becomes an extra political force. Union dues so obviously could
Speaker 3: contribute to the ability of unions to support some political
Speaker 3: candidates over others. And so you basically have a political
Speaker 3: patronage system that we've built up in America. And that's actually,
Speaker 3: I think the core issue. We need to start focusing
Speaker 3: on why did we let it get so bad? Not
Speaker 3: just that it's bad, because believe me, the President's focused
Speaker 3: on this. He's created the task force, as you heard
Speaker 3: mentioned with the Vice president's thing spectacular job leading our
Speaker 3: efforts to try to attach these bad apples. But the
Speaker 3: corruption is very deep because it has been systematized and
Speaker 3: allowed to prosper well.
Speaker 1: I mean, this is the thing I mean, and this
Speaker 1: is the most ironic thing. I'm sure you're aware of
Speaker 1: the work of Nick Shirley and in the particular case
Speaker 1: in Minnesota, how to deal in large part with the
Speaker 1: Somali community. I think you told me, I think it
Speaker 1: was you that they had an autism rate of some
Speaker 1: eighty seven percent in the Somali community of Minnesota. Am
Speaker 1: I right about that?
Speaker 3: I don't know if that number is right, but they
Speaker 3: did definitely they claim to have a higher baseline incidents,
Speaker 3: but without question, they paid moms to dishonestly claim their
Speaker 3: kids autistic and by doing that, obviously they settled their
Speaker 3: child with the diagnosis for life. But they also were
Speaker 3: able to create all kinds of jobs, often for members
Speaker 3: of the community. They took a budget shown there was
Speaker 3: three million dollars. I think at the four hundred million dollars.
Speaker 3: I mean, come on, someone had to pactlessly allowing that
Speaker 3: to happen.
Speaker 1: And then they seem to be targeting big care centers
Speaker 1: that are claiming that they're watching children all day that
Speaker 1: are nonexistent. And then in the case of California, and
Speaker 1: this is what Nick Shirley found out, which I guess
Speaker 1: is why they want the Silence Nick Shirley Act, which
Speaker 1: is insane. I mean this, I think he's done us
Speaker 1: a great service. But also hospice care. Now, where does
Speaker 1: that money come for hospice care? For states like California,
Speaker 1: aren't their federal tax dollars involved.
Speaker 3: Hospice care is almost all Medicare. So think about this.
Speaker 3: You're living in New Mexico, which is a blue state
Speaker 3: but not an affluent state, and your tax pill comes
Speaker 3: due and you got to pay extra money. Why because
Speaker 3: your tax dollars are going to pay for the fraud
Speaker 3: that's taking place in Los Angeles. That just doesn't sound
Speaker 3: very fair to me. You or anybody else is singing
Speaker 3: right now. But let's go over the numbers, and Nick
Speaker 3: Shirley has done a fantastic job just showcasing what these
Speaker 3: people actually are thinking about when they're stealing money from
Speaker 3: almost vulnerable Remember hospices for people who are predicted to
Speaker 3: die within six months. There are fifty eight hundred hospices
Speaker 3: in America. One third of them, one third of all
Speaker 3: the hospices in America are in Los Angeles, not California.
Speaker 3: Los Angeles how many people are dying there. I mean,
Speaker 3: think about this, and what they allowed to have happened
Speaker 3: was all the doctors got on board with, you know,
Speaker 3: looking the other way, the stick county regulators, the attorney generals,
Speaker 3: all of these people are supposed to be policing the system.
Speaker 3: They didn't care because the system itself was able to
Speaker 3: bring money into Los Angeles and is coming in from
Speaker 3: other states. This hurts the system. It corrupts the fundamental
Speaker 3: safety net that we have built for America. The country
Speaker 3: sixty years ago lost Medicare and Medicaid, these beautiful programs
Speaker 3: that the crown jewels of our safety net system. On
Speaker 3: the belief that we had shared values, we would not
Speaker 3: take advantage of them. So Medicare was for people retired.
Speaker 3: Medicaid was for people who Hubert Hemphrey called them people
Speaker 3: lived in the shadows, folks who had had trouble with
Speaker 3: their lives, they had chronic illnesses, they were just having difficulties.
Speaker 3: They needed help. That's what we do. All great people
Speaker 3: help their most needy. And so we did that for
Speaker 3: sixty years. And when COVID hit, somehow we lost our way.
Speaker 3: And then we had an administration that wasn't interested in it.
Speaker 3: It's not this similar from the border. By the way, Sean,
Speaker 3: if you want to get people psyched up in the
Speaker 3: right way, the way that the President was able to
Speaker 3: fix the border almost immediately and drop it by ninety
Speaker 3: nine percent the illegal immigration flow, we can fix corruption
Speaker 3: in America. What you need is for people to focus
Speaker 3: on it and then I'll allow those people to do
Speaker 3: their jobs. So take hospice in Los Angeles. We just
Speaker 3: talked about it. We have now stopped payments to four
Speaker 3: hundred hospices in southern California.
Speaker 1: Four hundreds, I mean, and this is what I don't
Speaker 1: think more people to think about. I mean, you mentioned
Speaker 1: Los Angeles at the high percentage. It is really money
Speaker 1: that is being stolen. I mean to say that we could,
Speaker 1: you know, double the the longevity of this program that
Speaker 1: so many Americans rely on and depend on, just by
Speaker 1: eliminating waste, fraud, corruption and abuse. That is so deep
Speaker 1: and so profound to me. And it's like it's just
Speaker 1: outright stealing, and nobody seems to be held accountable.
Speaker 3: Well, people are being held accountable now. I hope you
Speaker 3: saw this bus we did out there with the Great
Speaker 3: US attorney in Los Angeles, Billiasale. But we booked, you know,
Speaker 3: we took that seven big frosters. One of them I
Speaker 3: was able to attend pre dawn swat raid husband and
Speaker 3: wife couple living in a beautiful mansion in Los Angeles,
Speaker 3: and they his doctored a nurse wife and they were
Speaker 3: quickly snapped up in pre dawn hours and they didn't
Speaker 3: think anyone would ever come for them. That couple was
Speaker 3: interviewed four years ago about the massive fraud they were
Speaker 3: perpetrating on the American people. No one did anything. So
Speaker 3: what the President said, he called all of US attorneys
Speaker 3: did and said, guys enough, I want you guys focused
Speaker 3: on healthcare fraud. It is a huge part of the
Speaker 3: epidemic of fraud we're facing our country. It represents probably
Speaker 3: half the money that's stolen in aggregate. Because the healthcare
Speaker 3: system is so big and it's it's become so easy
Speaker 3: to target the healthcare system by stealing beneficiary numbers. Those
Speaker 3: are the numbers that all the folks on Medicare get.
Speaker 3: There's probably five million of those numbers that are stolen now,
Speaker 3: and so you can create false bills and sean where
Speaker 3: you live in South Florida, there are twice as many
Speaker 3: durable medical equipment suppliers using those stolen numbers. Then there
Speaker 3: are McDonald's. Think about that, twice as many durbal medical
Speaker 3: equipment suppliers with selling wheelchairs and canes than McDonald's. I mean,
Speaker 3: it's obviously fraud in South Florida. We think the Cuban
Speaker 3: government's involved. In California, we have the Russian mafia. In
Speaker 3: New York, You've got the Chinese involved. I mean, we
Speaker 3: have foreign governments we believe getting involved now and large
Speaker 3: organized middle syndicates to pulling this money out and money
Speaker 3: laundering is actually one of the ways that we can
Speaker 3: catch these guys. That's why I set working closely with Treasury.
Speaker 3: This is by way an all of government approach. So
Speaker 3: the President wants everybody on board. So when Scott Besson
Speaker 3: allows his forensic accountants to work through a problem with
Speaker 3: the US Attorney on a case that we've provided data on,
Speaker 3: you get answered. You get answered very quickly.
Speaker 4: You know.
Speaker 1: I just want people to understand this is this is
Speaker 1: something you're paying into, This is money coming directly out
Speaker 1: of your pocket. I would like to see states held accountable.
Speaker 1: I don't have a lot of time left. How can
Speaker 1: we hold the states that are allowing this institutionalized fraud
Speaker 1: to continue? How did they get punished for doing so
Speaker 1: by not stopping the corruption.
Speaker 3: Well, the day after the State of the Union, when
Speaker 3: the President announced the task force, the Vice President and
Speaker 3: I had a press conference and announced a deferment of
Speaker 3: a quarter billion dollars just for the last quarter the
Speaker 3: Minnesota because the bills that they had sent didn't add up.
Speaker 3: And so one of the ways we do bring people
Speaker 3: to bear for their their fair mistakes is to audit
Speaker 3: them and make sure they have backup. And so one
Speaker 3: by one we're going to go through states that don't
Speaker 3: be focused on this, and I want to just give
Speaker 3: people getting confidence because it's a good news story in
Speaker 3: many ways. Look at Florida. I wrote a letter to
Speaker 3: Governors Santis. I said, we're going to audit you. We
Speaker 3: want to know this and this and this, and we
Speaker 3: had a national moratorium on these durable medical equipment suppliers
Speaker 3: that I mentioned earlier. Governors Stantis wrote back and said,
Speaker 3: what fine, I'll take that. I'll double down on it.
Speaker 3: I want to have a ban on all durbal medical
Speaker 3: equipment suppliers within our state on Medicaid. That's how you react.
Speaker 3: You don't run from the problem. You embrace it. And
Speaker 3: so while Governor Newsom is off, you know, talking about
Speaker 3: problems outside of his own state and not really addressing
Speaker 3: the fundamental crisis that they're facing, which of course hurts
Speaker 3: all the other forty nine states, you've got other governors
Speaker 3: taking this seriously and going after it. And I think
Speaker 3: that's going to be a big issue over the next
Speaker 3: six months. Are we able to figure out who's serious
Speaker 3: about this crisis and we'll deal with it, and who's
Speaker 3: running from the problem because they were part of it.
Speaker 1: All right, Doctor Melminas, we appreciate it. Please stay on this.
Speaker 1: This is too important. There's too much money involved, Doctor Meminas,
Speaker 1: thank you, sir. One of the things that's happening in
Speaker 1: Virginia tomorrow is a redistricting vote, which we have been
Speaker 1: talking at length about, and you know it's imperative if
Speaker 1: you're a Republican. They want to squeeze any chance that
Speaker 1: you could have any any representation in the in Congress.
Speaker 1: It's unbelievable. You have Abigail Spanberger. This is the biggest
Speaker 1: power grab ever of any one state governor. I mean,
Speaker 1: Trump got forty six percent of the vote, and she
Speaker 1: wants to go against you know, a commission that put
Speaker 1: together districting inside of Virginia, and she wants all these
Speaker 1: liberal Democrats to take that away. And then the ultimate
Speaker 1: result would be Democrats would end up with ten safe
Speaker 1: congressional seats Republicans would have won. Yet Donald Trump got
Speaker 1: forty six percent of the vote. Why do I bring
Speaker 1: this up? Well, listen to the likes of James Carvell.
Speaker 1: He's telegraphing where these lunatics will go if they ever
Speaker 1: get both Houses of Congress and the presidency, they would
Speaker 1: make Puerto Rico a state, d C estate, and of
Speaker 1: course they would pack the Supreme Court.
Speaker 5: He's saying it. Listen to them when they say it.
Speaker 1: If the GMO pass, run in presidency in both Houses
Speaker 1: of Congress, I think on day one, this should make
Speaker 1: Puerto Rico you see, a state, and you should expand
Speaker 1: the Supreme Court to thirteen.
Speaker 6: Eat our dust.
Speaker 1: Yeah, there you go. I mean, it couldn't be any
Speaker 1: more clear. Listen to him. All right, let's go to
Speaker 1: Todd in Texas. Todd, how are you God blessed Texas?
Speaker 5: Happy? Monday, glad you called sir.
Speaker 4: Hey, Sean, how are you appreciate you taking them a come?
Speaker 5: Oh, it's my pleasure. What's going on?
Speaker 3: You know?
Speaker 4: So Friday, I was driving down to Houston for my son,
Speaker 4: and I came back and I'm listening to the radio,
Speaker 4: and all day I heard all this and misinformation about
Speaker 4: what Trump was doing and money was going to give Iran,
Speaker 4: and I just kind of thought, for a moment, God,
Speaker 4: I wish I had the truth. And there was this
Speaker 4: part of me that said, I wish we could actually
Speaker 4: have some kind of verify where Sean Hennedy would say
Speaker 4: this was actually said by Trump, and the news media
Speaker 4: wouldn't actually just be able to say false stuff. They
Speaker 4: could just say the truth and they could say this
Speaker 4: was verified like you would on Twitter on any other medium.
Speaker 4: And you know, to me, I read all the news.
Speaker 4: I'm always paying attention, but like, I feel like there's
Speaker 4: so much libel and misinformation given. I just wonder, Sean,
Speaker 4: what are we going to do about all this stuff
Speaker 4: where we can actually tell the truth and not have
Speaker 4: people be misled by the media.
Speaker 1: Well, I did that on Friday because I read directly
Speaker 1: from President Trump's own post that there had been I've
Speaker 1: heard the same rumors that you heard. My phone was
Speaker 1: blowing up. Why would Trump do this? Why would he
Speaker 1: give the Iranians twenty billion dollars? And I'm like, yeah,
Speaker 1: that doesn't sound like Donald Trump to me, Let's see
Speaker 1: what's let's see what happens.
Speaker 4: Oh, well, you have the best.
Speaker 5: And then and then, and then he posted that he's
Speaker 5: not doing.
Speaker 4: It, and I'm captive in the car. I'm driving like
Speaker 4: I'm captive for four hours, and I'm thinking, that doesn't
Speaker 4: sound like a Donald Trump. I know, you know him
Speaker 4: way better than I do, but like, to me, is
Speaker 4: a just constituent. I'm thinking, God, how can they say
Speaker 4: this stuff on the news when it's totally false. There's
Speaker 4: got to be some better way where we could verify
Speaker 4: this libel that they're giving.
Speaker 1: Well, if you were in the car listening to this
Speaker 1: show on Friday, I was reading directly from the president's
Speaker 1: own truth posts, and he said, no, it's not true.
Speaker 1: I'm not giving them twenty billion dollars. I'm not doing it.
Speaker 4: I know, and it sounds crazy even to think it,
Speaker 4: but so many people believe that. It's just like, oh,
Speaker 4: that's what he's doing. It's crazy.
Speaker 1: The worst part is I spent half my day Friday
Speaker 1: dealing with people on our side saying, what the hell
Speaker 1: is he doing? You need to call him, you need
Speaker 1: to talk to him, You need to talk of all
Speaker 1: what makes up his own mind? And if he really
Speaker 1: thought it was a good deal, I'd like to hear
Speaker 1: his rationale behind it. I can't think of a circumstances
Speaker 1: with that where that would be a good deal. I
Speaker 1: know what the President's trying to do here, but the
Speaker 1: President was very clear today he doesn't care if they
Speaker 1: get a deal or not. It just may take a
Speaker 1: little bit longer than we had hoped. But he's going
Speaker 1: to get the nuclear dust, and he's going to open
Speaker 1: the straight of horn Moves. And if it takes more
Speaker 1: bombing to wake these idiots up and Iran, then it's
Speaker 1: going to take more bombing. And I want this to
Speaker 1: be over as soon as possible. However, the success of
Speaker 1: the mission has to transcend any other consideration in my view,
Speaker 1: and winning, and we define winning very clearly here. How
Speaker 1: would I define winning getting the nuclear dust, which was
Speaker 1: the number one priority of the president, having the straight open,
Speaker 1: free and free flow of oil, at market prices.
Speaker 5: And then you know what we've done.
Speaker 1: That was the president's mission, degrading their ability to have
Speaker 1: ballistic missiles, making the world a safer place for our
Speaker 1: children and grandchildren. And it's hard to talk to stupid,
Speaker 1: ignorant people that he just completely The President even addressed
Speaker 1: the insanity this on a truth post and I said
Speaker 1: right away, all these people pedaling this lie and Donald
Speaker 1: Trump did this for Israel and bb netan Yahoo and
Speaker 1: he's just Bibe's puppet, or he did it because of
Speaker 1: Mark Levin, Sean Hannity, Fox News. It has never been true.
Speaker 1: As a matter of fact, some of the people peddling
Speaker 1: those lies. I know for a fact, I wasn't in
Speaker 1: the Oval office giving the President my opinion on what
Speaker 1: he should do before Operation Epic Fury. But I know
Speaker 1: people on the other side that were, They were sitting
Speaker 1: right before him, and they just I think they're more
Speaker 1: angry that he didn't listen to them. And at the
Speaker 1: end of the day, I've always known that Trump will
Speaker 1: will follow. You know, He's got good instincts and in
Speaker 1: the end, he's going to make up his own mind.
Speaker 1: He's a man of his own mind. Anyway, Todd, listen
Speaker 1: to this show more well, we're trying to help you out.
Speaker 1: We have been right more often than not, going back
Speaker 1: to my days with Richard Jewel, Duke Lacrosse, Uva, Ferguson Missouri,
Speaker 1: hands up, don't shoot, Freddie Gray Baltimore, George Zimmerman, Ravon Martin.
Speaker 1: We were right about Russia, the Russia hoax. We were
Speaker 1: right about the Ukraine impeachment. We were right about Faiza abuse.
Speaker 1: We were right about weaponization of justice and ten and
Speaker 1: an eleven year conspiracy to destroy this man. We've been
Speaker 1: right and everyone in the media has been wrong. Am
Speaker 1: I ever going to get credit for it?
Speaker 7: No?
Speaker 1: But whatever. Eileen, Ohio the Buckeye State. Happy Monday, Eileen,
Speaker 1: how are you?
Speaker 7: I'm good. Sean, how are you?
Speaker 5: I'm good. I'm glad you called. Hope you had a
Speaker 5: great week ago.
Speaker 3: I did.
Speaker 7: I did. We have a beautiful Monday here, and I
Speaker 7: appreciate the opportunity to talk to you as a second
Speaker 7: time caller. I love your show, and I'm going to
Speaker 7: give you credit for being right most of the time
Speaker 7: because I believe you are. I should tell you I am.
Speaker 1: Since there's a butt coming, I don't know why. My
Speaker 1: years of experience tell me there's a butt coming.
Speaker 7: Go ahead, there's a butt coming. I'm a native New Yorker.
Speaker 7: I lived on Long Island for over thirty years, and
Speaker 7: you might want to hear this, Sean, but Lindsa is right.
Speaker 7: It is pronounced silver palette sauce.
Speaker 1: No, you don't pronounce sauce. That is a New York
Speaker 1: way of saying it. That's like there there are people
Speaker 1: that famously refer to pasta sauce as gravy. It's not gravy.
Speaker 1: It's pasta sauce. It's not sauce. It's not coffee. It's
Speaker 1: not talk radio, it's not shan and it's not New York.
Speaker 1: That's not how most people in the country talk. It
Speaker 1: is a New York accent, and I happen to like accents.
Speaker 1: I just like to give Lynd the hard time about it.
Speaker 7: You know, I love it when you and Linda have
Speaker 7: that lighthearted banter back and forth because you deal with
Speaker 7: such serious topics that can be so setting that it's
Speaker 7: really a nice break. And I thank Linda for tolerating
Speaker 7: you at times.
Speaker 5: What do you mean me tolerating her?
Speaker 8: You know, she got my whole Monday.
Speaker 5: I am the boss.
Speaker 8: You know that I am the boss. You are the talent,
Speaker 8: and you should be grateful you're the talent. God blessed
Speaker 8: you with so much. It's a wonderful thing about Okay.
Speaker 1: But ultimately, it's called the Sean Hannity Show, and I
Speaker 1: am the boss of the Sean Hannity Show. And you
Speaker 1: work with a Sean Hannity show, which makes you subordinate
Speaker 1: to me the host.
Speaker 8: That's a stretch, but you know, I'll let you have
Speaker 8: it for now.
Speaker 7: You know, Sean, I could say that I am the
Speaker 7: boss because that is my maiden name.
Speaker 1: Actually, I could say that everyone in this audience is
Speaker 1: the boss, because if you stop listening, which I don't
Speaker 1: want people to ever do, I won't have a show.
Speaker 1: So I need to show up and realize who the
Speaker 1: real boss is.
Speaker 8: What's your maiden name?
Speaker 7: My maiden name is Boss.
Speaker 3: Oh?
Speaker 8: I thought you were going to say your maiden name
Speaker 8: was Hannity.
Speaker 5: I'm like, no, way, like Hugo Boss.
Speaker 7: That's right, that's right. But I wanted to I wanted
Speaker 7: to give you a little bit of a ribbing there
Speaker 7: because I love it when you and Linda go back
Speaker 7: and forth I'm going to saying sauce.
Speaker 1: Listen for everybody that lives in the South to Midwest,
Speaker 1: trust me, they're all they think that Linda does talk
Speaker 1: funny and that they hear the New York accent. And
Speaker 1: you know, when I'm tired, my New York accent kind
Speaker 1: of kicks back in. And by the way, in case
Speaker 1: you're not aware, I Leen, you have a New York accent.
Speaker 1: So no wonder why you would agree with Linda on
Speaker 1: pastave source because you lived in New York.
Speaker 8: She actually has a mix. She has a little bit
Speaker 8: of a Boston there too.
Speaker 5: I don't know what it is.
Speaker 7: Well, tell me all that I lived in New York
Speaker 7: until I was well over thirty. And I know I
Speaker 7: have an accent because people tell me all the time.
Speaker 7: And I have siblings that live on Long Island, so
Speaker 7: we talk to them at reinforces.
Speaker 1: I was as bad as you when I was in Huntsville,
Speaker 1: Alabama and Atlanta, Georgia. I didn't even realize until people
Speaker 1: kept pointing it out that I had a pretty thick
Speaker 1: New York accent. I worked at limiting it. Linda by
Speaker 1: annoying me, brings out more of it. Eileene We love you.
Speaker 1: You have a great day. God bless you, God bless Ohio.
Speaker 1: All right, let's get back to our busy telephones. It's
Speaker 1: eight hundred ninety four one Sean. If you want to
Speaker 1: be a part of the program, Gino Nevada Next, Sean
Speaker 1: Hannity Show, Happy Monday.
Speaker 6: Thank you, Sean, Thank you for everything you do, and
Speaker 6: thank you for taking my call. My point is, I
Speaker 6: really believe that the liberals constantly try to segregate this
Speaker 6: country as much as possible. And I understand that there's
Speaker 6: a decision coming down from the Supreme Court that addresses
Speaker 6: this redrawing of state maps due to this racial jerrymandering
Speaker 6: of black and Latino voters. And if the Court makes
Speaker 6: the right decision, what could this mean for the Republican Party.
Speaker 1: I think that decision should be a no brainer. I
Speaker 1: think equal. You know, there's been a false narrative that
Speaker 1: have been pushed. I had left that for example, go
Speaker 1: back Jim Crow two point zero. What did that originally
Speaker 1: begin in That began in Georgia when Governor Kemp was
Speaker 1: putting election integrity measures in place.
Speaker 5: And this is going.
Speaker 1: To prevent minorities in Georgia from voting, and then we
Speaker 1: had an election and there were more minorities that turned
Speaker 1: out than ever before. So it was a lie, just
Speaker 1: like the Save Act, you know, Jim Crow two point
Speaker 1: zero Chucky Schumer said, Democrats they just don't want voter integrity.
Speaker 1: And the only reason I can think of that they
Speaker 1: don't is they want the ability to cheat, because otherwise
Speaker 1: voter IDs, signature verification, pain to custody, controls of any
Speaker 1: mail in ballots, limiting mail in ballots, paper ballots, you know,
Speaker 1: all things that would bring integrity to the process, confidence
Speaker 1: and results. They don't want. Why don't they want it?
Speaker 1: I can only think of one reason, because it doesn't
Speaker 1: benefit them politically. Now they want a jerry Mander, you know,
Speaker 1: ce to such an extent that the guarantees them a
Speaker 1: majority in Congress.
Speaker 5: We have to prevent it.
Speaker 1: We have to fight, and I'm hoping that the Supreme
Speaker 1: Court will not allow this, this scheme of theirs to work. Anyway,
Speaker 1: I appreciate the call, Geno, Good call Brad Utah. Next
Speaker 1: Sean Hannity Show, Where in Utah are you, sir?
Speaker 9: I'm in Spanish, fork Nice.
Speaker 5: I hope there's a Crownburger there.
Speaker 9: No, Sean, Hey, buddy, you got to come out of
Speaker 9: your comfort zone. It's Burger Supreme and Pro Bowl.
Speaker 1: No, it's Crown Burger. You're never going to talk me
Speaker 1: out of it. It's great.
Speaker 3: Oh buddy, I do.
Speaker 1: Like in and out Burger too, but I like Crownburger
Speaker 1: and I like it and out Burger that's it. But
Speaker 1: I'm willing to try your place. I'll give it a shot.
Speaker 9: Okay, good, because we got to change you. What's going
Speaker 9: on the good life, Sean? Okay, question is a few
Speaker 9: weeks into the war. I don't know exactly the time frame.
Speaker 9: The President Trump made the statement that the Uranian people
Speaker 9: would get a signal as to when to move forward,
Speaker 9: and I know he hasn't forgotten about them. But what's
Speaker 9: going to become because eventually this war is going to end,
Speaker 9: not in Iran's favor. But what's the Iranian people getting
Speaker 9: to do? Because in my opinion, yeah.
Speaker 5: Figure listen.
Speaker 1: I hope that I know there have been attempts and
Speaker 1: I don't want to divulge sources here to get arms
Speaker 1: in the hands of the Iranian people. It is turned
Speaker 1: out to be more difficult than maybe some anticipated. I
Speaker 1: hope Ultimately, you know, you got to understand you can't
Speaker 1: win a sling you can't win a revolution with a slingshot,
Speaker 1: So that people would have to get armed, so that
Speaker 1: they'd have the ability to stand up to the Iranian
Speaker 1: Revolutionary Guards forces. That would be the ultimate outcome to me,
Speaker 1: and it's just a matter of if they can pull
Speaker 1: that off. It was not part of the president's original plan.
Speaker 1: I think we need to be very clear on that,
Speaker 1: and taking away their ability to foment terrorism, their ballistic
Speaker 1: missile capability, and obviously their nuclear capability, so you know,
Speaker 1: he's achieving set out to achieve, and that's the important part.
Speaker 5: Appreciate the call
Speaker 1: My friend, eight hundred nine four one Shawn or number
Speaker 1: if you want to be a part of the program.