WEBVTT - Cybersecurity, Fed Cut Outlook, Sectors to Watch

0:00:00.840 --> 0:00:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg Markets Podcast. I'm Paul Sweeney alongside

0:00:04.040 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 1>my co host Matt Miller.

0:00:05.640 --> 0:00:09.720
<v Speaker 2>Every business day we bring you interviews from CEOs, market pros,

0:00:09.720 --> 0:00:14.400
<v Speaker 2>and Bloomberg experts, along with essential market moving news. Find

0:00:14.400 --> 0:00:17.439
<v Speaker 2>the Bloomberg Markets podcast called Apple Podcasts or wherever you

0:00:17.520 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 2>listen to podcasts, and at Bloomberg dot com slash podcast.

0:00:21.160 --> 0:00:26.200
<v Speaker 3>What's the cybersecurity outlook? Let's see. Wendy Whitmore is head

0:00:26.239 --> 0:00:30.319
<v Speaker 3>of Unit forty two at Palo Alto Networks. Our next

0:00:30.360 --> 0:00:33.320
<v Speaker 3>guest in studio with us. Thanks for starting. Why would

0:00:33.360 --> 0:00:35.760
<v Speaker 3>you leave Palo Alto to come to New York. It's

0:00:35.800 --> 0:00:36.880
<v Speaker 3>like twenty below here.

0:00:37.159 --> 0:00:39.159
<v Speaker 4>It is cold here, There's no doubt about that.

0:00:39.520 --> 0:00:42.760
<v Speaker 3>Annie, tell us what is what is the unit? Unit?

0:00:42.880 --> 0:00:44.279
<v Speaker 3>Do I have that right? Unit forty two.

0:00:44.560 --> 0:00:47.919
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, Unit forty two is really Paloouto Network special forces

0:00:47.960 --> 0:00:50.440
<v Speaker 4>on the ground if you will, so we consult. We

0:00:50.479 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 4>solve our clients crises, so incident response and breach investigations,

0:00:54.280 --> 0:00:56.760
<v Speaker 4>threat intelligence and threat hunting throughout the world.

0:00:57.000 --> 0:00:58.800
<v Speaker 5>And tell us a little bit about your clients. Who

0:00:58.800 --> 0:00:59.960
<v Speaker 5>are they, what kind of work do they do?

0:01:00.800 --> 0:01:03.120
<v Speaker 4>Our clients really do a bit of everything, right, they

0:01:03.200 --> 0:01:07.320
<v Speaker 4>are global two thousand companies or smaller organizations or governments

0:01:07.360 --> 0:01:09.920
<v Speaker 4>throughout the world. We partner with a tremendous amount of

0:01:09.920 --> 0:01:13.240
<v Speaker 4>intelligence organizations to share information throughout the world as well

0:01:13.440 --> 0:01:15.200
<v Speaker 4>related to cyber threats and attacks.

0:01:15.319 --> 0:01:18.840
<v Speaker 3>Okay, what's the landscape right now in terms of cyber security?

0:01:19.000 --> 0:01:22.600
<v Speaker 3>I mean it's just like I also get at least

0:01:22.640 --> 0:01:26.520
<v Speaker 3>once a month, it seems now, a letter from whatever organization.

0:01:26.920 --> 0:01:30.520
<v Speaker 3>Last month it was from Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital

0:01:30.520 --> 0:01:35.279
<v Speaker 3>system saying they had a breach of their security, their

0:01:35.319 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 3>their computer systems and some data patient data was leaked out.

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:43.520
<v Speaker 3>And oh you know, here's a consolation prize. We're going

0:01:43.600 --> 0:01:48.200
<v Speaker 3>to give you a year free of cyber security threat

0:01:48.200 --> 0:01:53.000
<v Speaker 3>detection or credit monitoring, whatever it is, credit monitoring. What's

0:01:53.040 --> 0:01:55.760
<v Speaker 3>the landscape right now? Things seem to have gotten a

0:01:55.960 --> 0:01:56.680
<v Speaker 3>lot worse.

0:01:57.200 --> 0:02:00.720
<v Speaker 4>The landscape is a bit chaotic, especially going into twenty

0:02:00.760 --> 0:02:04.040
<v Speaker 4>twenty four. We're going to have over sixty major elections

0:02:04.080 --> 0:02:06.560
<v Speaker 4>throughout the world happening in this year alone. Right, this

0:02:06.600 --> 0:02:09.600
<v Speaker 4>will be the largest voting that's ever occurred. So I

0:02:09.639 --> 0:02:12.200
<v Speaker 4>think an easy way to remember it is the three

0:02:12.400 --> 0:02:16.880
<v Speaker 4>s's speed scale and sophistication. We're seeing attacks happen faster

0:02:17.040 --> 0:02:19.519
<v Speaker 4>than they have been before. So when an attacker gets

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:22.280
<v Speaker 4>in an environment, they are stealing data within a matter

0:02:22.320 --> 0:02:26.200
<v Speaker 4>of hours in some cases. From a scale perspective, you mentioned,

0:02:26.240 --> 0:02:28.280
<v Speaker 4>you know, maybe on a weekly basis that you're getting

0:02:28.280 --> 0:02:31.519
<v Speaker 4>a letter write about another breach that's occurred. This scale

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:34.359
<v Speaker 4>attackers for the first time in history, they're no longer

0:02:34.639 --> 0:02:37.320
<v Speaker 4>doing only spear phishing, which is sending an email to

0:02:37.360 --> 0:02:39.120
<v Speaker 4>an employee right and they click on a link and

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:43.360
<v Speaker 4>they get infected that way. They're actually exploiting vulnerabilities at scale,

0:02:43.520 --> 0:02:47.240
<v Speaker 4>So within hours there could be hundreds of thousands of

0:02:47.280 --> 0:02:51.919
<v Speaker 4>systems affected by a three CX and Microsoft Exchange for example.

0:02:52.240 --> 0:02:56.080
<v Speaker 4>And then sophistication. It's long been certainly that nation state

0:02:56.120 --> 0:02:59.160
<v Speaker 4>actors are highly sophisticated, but now we're looking at cyber

0:02:59.200 --> 0:03:02.360
<v Speaker 4>criminals who have a deeper understanding of business to business

0:03:02.400 --> 0:03:06.000
<v Speaker 4>interactions and processes than we've ever seen before, and they're

0:03:06.080 --> 0:03:07.280
<v Speaker 4>using that to their advantage.

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:11.840
<v Speaker 5>Wow, So a few things I'm scared. A few things

0:03:11.840 --> 0:03:14.359
<v Speaker 5>you just mentioned there that definitely made me scared. You're

0:03:14.400 --> 0:03:19.760
<v Speaker 5>mentioning cybersecurity elections and nation states of course makes me

0:03:19.800 --> 0:03:23.200
<v Speaker 5>think twenty sixteen, you know, we are heading toward another

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:26.120
<v Speaker 5>election here in the US, very likely could have Trump

0:03:26.200 --> 0:03:29.000
<v Speaker 5>on the ballot again. I don't know, do we start

0:03:29.040 --> 0:03:32.200
<v Speaker 5>thinking again about potential Russian interference in the US election?

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:34.360
<v Speaker 5>I mean, where is your mind at right now in

0:03:34.440 --> 0:03:37.000
<v Speaker 5>terms of threats with this election coming up?

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:39.560
<v Speaker 4>I think that's a great question. But I think the

0:03:39.600 --> 0:03:41.839
<v Speaker 4>reality is we have to be thinking about nation state

0:03:41.880 --> 0:03:45.720
<v Speaker 4>interference from countries throughout the world. Right, we have now

0:03:45.760 --> 0:03:48.640
<v Speaker 4>with the onset and advent of generative AI, we have

0:03:48.720 --> 0:03:53.480
<v Speaker 4>the ability to speed up written and verbal communications and

0:03:53.520 --> 0:03:56.640
<v Speaker 4>make them sound more polished and genuine than we've ever

0:03:56.680 --> 0:03:59.960
<v Speaker 4>seen before. So I would imagine from a disinformation campaig,

0:04:00.480 --> 0:04:02.920
<v Speaker 4>we're going to see more of those emanating from throughout

0:04:02.920 --> 0:04:06.240
<v Speaker 4>the world, and we really need to be concerned about

0:04:06.280 --> 0:04:07.760
<v Speaker 4>where information is coming from.

0:04:08.240 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 3>From a business perspective, and particularly one of the areas

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:14.760
<v Speaker 3>that uncovered with the small businesses, and they are especially

0:04:14.840 --> 0:04:17.479
<v Speaker 3>vulnerable because they just don't have the resources I would

0:04:17.520 --> 0:04:21.240
<v Speaker 3>imagine to combat this on a regular basis. They're liable

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:25.440
<v Speaker 3>when that information when a client's information is stolen, right,

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:28.040
<v Speaker 3>I mean from a legal perspective, they have to keep

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:29.440
<v Speaker 3>that in mind certainly.

0:04:30.720 --> 0:04:33.359
<v Speaker 4>You know, cybersecurity is really a team sport at this point.

0:04:33.400 --> 0:04:35.400
<v Speaker 4>And you hit on a key factor of that, which

0:04:35.480 --> 0:04:38.560
<v Speaker 4>is small businesses are not only responsible for their own information,

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:40.960
<v Speaker 4>but for those of their clients, and they may have

0:04:41.560 --> 0:04:43.800
<v Speaker 4>a chain where they're part of a big supply chain

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:47.160
<v Speaker 4>for a large organization that does have more resources. So

0:04:47.240 --> 0:04:50.560
<v Speaker 4>that is a huge challenge for executives throughout the world

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:52.839
<v Speaker 4>today is to make sure that not only they're securing

0:04:52.880 --> 0:04:56.400
<v Speaker 4>their own communications, but their clients are consumers and everyone

0:04:56.400 --> 0:04:57.320
<v Speaker 4>they're doing business with.

0:04:57.800 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, you know, this was actually even like a really

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:03.400
<v Speaker 5>big top heading into Davos this week that the survey

0:05:04.160 --> 0:05:08.320
<v Speaker 5>that some of these diplomats were conducted on were heading

0:05:08.320 --> 0:05:12.360
<v Speaker 5>into the World Economic Forum, that they ranked misinformation and

0:05:12.400 --> 0:05:15.720
<v Speaker 5>disinformation as the one as the top risk out of

0:05:15.720 --> 0:05:19.320
<v Speaker 5>ten for the short term and the long term. So

0:05:19.400 --> 0:05:21.840
<v Speaker 5>I thought that or sorry, the short term risk being

0:05:23.120 --> 0:05:26.320
<v Speaker 5>being this misinformation. So it is really interesting, I mean,

0:05:26.360 --> 0:05:29.039
<v Speaker 5>how does that then affect like the work that you do.

0:05:29.040 --> 0:05:30.880
<v Speaker 5>Do you feel like this is even more like under

0:05:30.920 --> 0:05:33.040
<v Speaker 5>a microscope and being scrutinized right now?

0:05:33.640 --> 0:05:36.800
<v Speaker 4>Well, I think the challenge with disinformation for example, is

0:05:36.880 --> 0:05:39.760
<v Speaker 4>it's not like a traditional cyber attack where you're necessarily

0:05:39.800 --> 0:05:42.279
<v Speaker 4>stealing data from an organization and there's some piece of

0:05:42.320 --> 0:05:45.880
<v Speaker 4>evidence to prove right. It really relies on the reader,

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:49.040
<v Speaker 4>the viewer, the consumer of that information to be discerning

0:05:49.120 --> 0:05:52.159
<v Speaker 4>and to understand and do their fact checking to really,

0:05:52.400 --> 0:05:54.360
<v Speaker 4>you know, get to the degree of is this information

0:05:54.520 --> 0:05:57.120
<v Speaker 4>legitimate or not to the degree that it has impact

0:05:57.200 --> 0:05:59.599
<v Speaker 4>on a business and the economy. I think that's a

0:05:59.760 --> 0:06:02.760
<v Speaker 4>you know, true factor. So twenty twenty four we're likely

0:06:02.800 --> 0:06:04.480
<v Speaker 4>to see more of that than we've seen before.

0:06:05.320 --> 0:06:10.080
<v Speaker 3>So with computing capacity you know, growing exponentially, et cetera,

0:06:10.279 --> 0:06:13.919
<v Speaker 3>so forth, I would imagine it's not a question of when,

0:06:14.080 --> 0:06:18.479
<v Speaker 3>but if, not a question of if, but when you're

0:06:18.480 --> 0:06:21.480
<v Speaker 3>going to suffer a cyber attack, a devastating cyber attack,

0:06:22.040 --> 0:06:23.200
<v Speaker 3>how do you protect yourself?

0:06:23.480 --> 0:06:26.400
<v Speaker 4>And no doubt organizations are aware this is happening at

0:06:26.440 --> 0:06:28.960
<v Speaker 4>a faster pace, right than we've ever seen before. So

0:06:29.000 --> 0:06:31.080
<v Speaker 4>I think the keys there are really being able to

0:06:31.200 --> 0:06:34.960
<v Speaker 4>understand what visibility into your environment, so understanding what are

0:06:35.040 --> 0:06:38.800
<v Speaker 4>legitimate communications and interactions what are not, And then what

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:41.920
<v Speaker 4>something that everyone can do is practice in advance, right

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:44.240
<v Speaker 4>practice these plans make sure you know how to get

0:06:44.240 --> 0:06:46.720
<v Speaker 4>a hold of your employees and your team members, and

0:06:47.680 --> 0:06:49.440
<v Speaker 4>in the event that you don't have access to your

0:06:49.480 --> 0:06:52.360
<v Speaker 4>primary email and other types of communications, that you can

0:06:52.400 --> 0:06:56.480
<v Speaker 4>really respond quickly. On a personal note, I cannot stress

0:06:56.600 --> 0:06:59.600
<v Speaker 4>enough do not reuse the same passwords for every single account,

0:06:59.680 --> 0:07:03.040
<v Speaker 4>for every application, and for every application you can make

0:07:03.040 --> 0:07:05.960
<v Speaker 4>sure you have multi factor authentication enabled so that you

0:07:06.040 --> 0:07:07.920
<v Speaker 4>make yourself less of a target.

0:07:07.640 --> 0:07:10.840
<v Speaker 5>And don't click those emails. John say alert, Oh.

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:14.640
<v Speaker 3>Wendy, do you have like just anecdotally, like, what's give

0:07:14.760 --> 0:07:16.560
<v Speaker 3>us some horror stories that you've dealt with.

0:07:17.320 --> 0:07:20.040
<v Speaker 4>Well, So, for example, just last week, we're working for

0:07:20.120 --> 0:07:23.840
<v Speaker 4>an incident response, meaning a breach investigation for a healthcare organization,

0:07:24.280 --> 0:07:26.720
<v Speaker 4>and in this case it's a ransomware actor. Not only

0:07:26.760 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 4>do they reach out to try to extort the healthcare organization,

0:07:30.000 --> 0:07:32.800
<v Speaker 4>they're reaching out individually to patients and in this case

0:07:32.800 --> 0:07:35.800
<v Speaker 4>it's cancer patients, and they're saying, hey, for three dollars,

0:07:35.840 --> 0:07:38.840
<v Speaker 4>you can preview the information that we've stolen about you,

0:07:39.160 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 4>and for fifty dollars you can pay us to make

0:07:41.440 --> 0:07:43.680
<v Speaker 4>sure that we don't expose this further on the internet.

0:07:44.400 --> 0:07:47.240
<v Speaker 4>This is horrific behavior. We're likely to see more of

0:07:47.280 --> 0:07:50.760
<v Speaker 4>this as these ransomware actors continue to monetize their attacks.

0:07:51.080 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 3>They ever caught the ransomware actors or they rush or

0:07:55.920 --> 0:07:59.640
<v Speaker 3>some far off place where you're never going to you

0:07:59.760 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 3>just reach them.

0:08:00.920 --> 0:08:02.680
<v Speaker 4>Well, the great news I think is there's a lot

0:08:02.720 --> 0:08:05.440
<v Speaker 4>more information now, So multiple governments throughout the world are

0:08:05.440 --> 0:08:08.840
<v Speaker 4>collaborating on these attacks. We have law enforcement actually going

0:08:08.840 --> 0:08:13.400
<v Speaker 4>after disrupting these ransomware actors their infrastructure, so the tools

0:08:13.400 --> 0:08:16.000
<v Speaker 4>that they're using to host and wage these attacks. And

0:08:16.040 --> 0:08:18.160
<v Speaker 4>then certainly we're moving to the point where we're now

0:08:18.200 --> 0:08:22.679
<v Speaker 4>disrupting from an actual arrest standpoint too. So good news,

0:08:22.720 --> 0:08:24.480
<v Speaker 4>but still slow going in that aspect.

0:08:24.680 --> 0:08:26.440
<v Speaker 5>So one more here for you, Wendy. We had some

0:08:26.480 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 5>news out of JP Morgan this morning. They're saying that

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:31.080
<v Speaker 5>they've seen an increase in hackers that are trying to

0:08:31.120 --> 0:08:35.480
<v Speaker 5>infiltrate their systems and JP Morgan spends about fifteen billion

0:08:35.520 --> 0:08:38.800
<v Speaker 5>dollars a year on technology as part of its attempts

0:08:38.800 --> 0:08:42.680
<v Speaker 5>to bolster its cyber defenses. Obviously we're not all JP Morgan,

0:08:42.720 --> 0:08:44.760
<v Speaker 5>but this could get very expensive.

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:47.839
<v Speaker 4>Oh, no doubt. I mean, this has a true economic impact, right.

0:08:47.840 --> 0:08:49.760
<v Speaker 4>But I think the good news there and the silver

0:08:49.880 --> 0:08:53.319
<v Speaker 4>lining is we're seeing so many more organizations really effectively

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:56.440
<v Speaker 4>prepare to detect these attacks. So in JP Morgan's case,

0:08:56.640 --> 0:08:59.560
<v Speaker 4>they're detecting them, they're preventing them, they're gathering data that

0:08:59.559 --> 0:09:02.240
<v Speaker 4>they're sharing with the community so that more and more

0:09:02.280 --> 0:09:05.280
<v Speaker 4>others can also protect and defend themselves as well. So

0:09:05.440 --> 0:09:07.040
<v Speaker 4>I think there's a good story there as well.

0:09:07.280 --> 0:09:11.240
<v Speaker 3>Okay, I'm changing my passer from JBT one two three four.

0:09:11.520 --> 0:09:15.440
<v Speaker 5>It's not password one two three Oh no, that was

0:09:15.480 --> 0:09:16.120
<v Speaker 5>my old one.

0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:19.640
<v Speaker 3>Okay, Wendy, thanks so much. Wendy Whitmore is senior vice president,

0:09:19.679 --> 0:09:24.120
<v Speaker 3>head of Unit forty two at Pallo Outdo Networks in

0:09:24.160 --> 0:09:26.680
<v Speaker 3>the studio, so she gets a goals start today.

0:09:27.640 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 6>You're listening to the team, can't her live program Bloomberg

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:34.520
<v Speaker 6>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg dot Com,

0:09:34.559 --> 0:09:37.680
<v Speaker 6>the iHeartRadio app and the Bloomberg Business App, or listen

0:09:37.760 --> 0:09:39.880
<v Speaker 6>on demand wherever you get your podcasts.

0:09:41.760 --> 0:09:44.600
<v Speaker 3>Is twenty twenty four, the year for a rebound. Our

0:09:44.679 --> 0:09:47.680
<v Speaker 3>next guest has some thoughts on that. Thomas Smell is

0:09:47.760 --> 0:09:51.560
<v Speaker 3>CEO of f E International. Before we get to the deals.

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:53.680
<v Speaker 3>What do you guys do? What is the company you

0:09:53.720 --> 0:09:54.280
<v Speaker 3>have all about?

0:09:54.400 --> 0:09:57.559
<v Speaker 1>So f International we focus on middle market tech, M

0:09:57.600 --> 0:10:00.760
<v Speaker 1>and A too, work with buys and sellers of companies

0:10:00.840 --> 0:10:04.600
<v Speaker 1>up to generally three hundred million in evaluation. In total,

0:10:04.640 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 1>we've closed over fifteen hundred transactions.

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:12.080
<v Speaker 3>So you're in an advisory capacity exactly where an advisor. Yeah, okay,

0:10:12.880 --> 0:10:15.320
<v Speaker 3>twenty twenty three is a year year. I would imagine

0:10:15.360 --> 0:10:17.520
<v Speaker 3>you want to forget what's the outlook?

0:10:17.800 --> 0:10:19.960
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So I mean twenty twenty three I think finished

0:10:19.960 --> 0:10:21.959
<v Speaker 1>on a reasonable high. So if we look at our

0:10:22.000 --> 0:10:25.120
<v Speaker 1>deal volume second half of twenty twenty three versus second

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:27.800
<v Speaker 1>half of twenty twenty two, we're up fifty six percent.

0:10:27.880 --> 0:10:30.840
<v Speaker 1>So deals are still happening, particularly in the middle market.

0:10:30.880 --> 0:10:34.040
<v Speaker 1>Lower middle market, I think where a lot of people

0:10:34.080 --> 0:10:37.320
<v Speaker 1>see deal volumes slow down as really those much larger transactions,

0:10:37.400 --> 0:10:41.400
<v Speaker 1>So it's much less those billion dollar and above deal's happening,

0:10:41.440 --> 0:10:44.400
<v Speaker 1>but the still activity lower down.

0:10:44.679 --> 0:10:47.120
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, and it sounds like this year obviously, if interest

0:10:47.200 --> 0:10:49.120
<v Speaker 5>rates are going to come down, that should probably help

0:10:49.160 --> 0:10:50.800
<v Speaker 5>give a boost to the outlook.

0:10:50.440 --> 0:10:52.560
<v Speaker 1>This year, right, Yeah, for sure, I think last year

0:10:52.559 --> 0:10:54.320
<v Speaker 1>there was a lot of uncertainty about what's going to

0:10:54.320 --> 0:10:56.600
<v Speaker 1>happen to interest rates, and they kept getting pushed upwards,

0:10:56.679 --> 0:10:58.160
<v Speaker 1>so a lot of buyers were kind of sitting on

0:10:58.200 --> 0:11:00.800
<v Speaker 1>the sidelines waiting to see what would happen. Now, I

0:11:00.840 --> 0:11:04.400
<v Speaker 1>think most analysts are predicting maybe two or three interest

0:11:04.440 --> 0:11:08.080
<v Speaker 1>rate cuts this year, so buyers are definitely getting more active,

0:11:08.120 --> 0:11:11.600
<v Speaker 1>particularly those who are using debt. But on the flip side,

0:11:11.640 --> 0:11:15.360
<v Speaker 1>there's still four trillion dollars of dry powder with private

0:11:15.360 --> 0:11:18.000
<v Speaker 1>equity firms that they need to deploy, which is sitting

0:11:18.000 --> 0:11:20.680
<v Speaker 1>there in cash, so there's still the ability to do

0:11:20.720 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>deals even if they don't use debt.

0:11:22.640 --> 0:11:25.360
<v Speaker 3>How does it work. Do they come to you mostly

0:11:25.559 --> 0:11:28.600
<v Speaker 3>or you see the opportunity, are like, hey, this is

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 3>something that might make sense in terms of M and A,

0:11:32.440 --> 0:11:34.280
<v Speaker 3>and you approach those companies.

0:11:34.360 --> 0:11:36.200
<v Speaker 1>So generally they will come to us. We've been in

0:11:36.240 --> 0:11:38.080
<v Speaker 1>business like fourteen years now, so we get a lot

0:11:38.120 --> 0:11:40.360
<v Speaker 1>of word of mouth. Founders will come directly to us

0:11:40.400 --> 0:11:42.920
<v Speaker 1>wanting us to help sell their business. Maybe they're ready

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:45.240
<v Speaker 1>to move on, maybe they've had an approach and they

0:11:45.240 --> 0:11:47.800
<v Speaker 1>want someone to help advise them. And then we'll work

0:11:47.840 --> 0:11:51.040
<v Speaker 1>through the process of reaching out to suitable buyers and

0:11:51.120 --> 0:11:52.080
<v Speaker 1>negotiating from that.

0:11:53.480 --> 0:11:56.600
<v Speaker 3>How do they reach that decision? Give me a specific

0:11:56.880 --> 0:11:59.280
<v Speaker 3>like when they know it's time to do something.

0:11:59.320 --> 0:12:01.000
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So for a lot of people, that's very much

0:12:01.000 --> 0:12:04.560
<v Speaker 1>the personal decision. So like everyone has, I think in

0:12:04.600 --> 0:12:07.040
<v Speaker 1>the entrepreneurial world has their number. The number might be

0:12:07.480 --> 0:12:10.480
<v Speaker 1>ten million, fifty million, one hundred million, two hundred million.

0:12:10.559 --> 0:12:13.000
<v Speaker 1>Personally they want to walk away with when they get

0:12:13.040 --> 0:12:14.600
<v Speaker 1>to that level in terms of where they can sell

0:12:14.640 --> 0:12:17.280
<v Speaker 1>their company, they might just decide to walk away. Then

0:12:17.640 --> 0:12:19.079
<v Speaker 1>some people walk away when they have a change of

0:12:19.280 --> 0:12:22.840
<v Speaker 1>personal circumstances. Maybe they've got kids going to college and

0:12:22.840 --> 0:12:24.480
<v Speaker 1>they want to kind of spend more time with them,

0:12:24.600 --> 0:12:26.440
<v Speaker 1>or maybe they want to spend less time with them

0:12:26.480 --> 0:12:29.319
<v Speaker 1>and where they want to take time away from from work.

0:12:29.400 --> 0:12:33.160
<v Speaker 1>It can work in even directions. A lot of the time,

0:12:33.160 --> 0:12:35.000
<v Speaker 1>founders just get an approach, So they get an approach

0:12:35.000 --> 0:12:37.720
<v Speaker 1>from a buyer that gets them excited about the idea

0:12:37.720 --> 0:12:39.600
<v Speaker 1>of selling and they just want someone to help kind

0:12:39.600 --> 0:12:42.160
<v Speaker 1>of work through the process with them. Other times, I think,

0:12:42.240 --> 0:12:44.640
<v Speaker 1>particularly in kind of the current world of tech, it

0:12:44.720 --> 0:12:48.000
<v Speaker 1>moves so quickly, founders will have new ideas that they're like, well,

0:12:48.040 --> 0:12:50.079
<v Speaker 1>I've got a new business idea. How about I sell

0:12:50.160 --> 0:12:52.480
<v Speaker 1>my current company. I'm going to go work on this instead,

0:12:52.600 --> 0:12:54.280
<v Speaker 1>and I'll get some liquidity in the meantime.

0:12:54.880 --> 0:12:58.319
<v Speaker 5>So you'd mentioned private equity. Are you working in transactions

0:12:58.320 --> 0:13:00.640
<v Speaker 5>a lot that in which case that is buyer or

0:13:00.679 --> 0:13:04.200
<v Speaker 5>is this mostly you know, one business acquiring another.

0:13:04.720 --> 0:13:07.280
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, so privacy probably makes up about fifty percent of

0:13:07.360 --> 0:13:09.880
<v Speaker 1>the deals we work on. We work with a lot

0:13:09.880 --> 0:13:12.040
<v Speaker 1>of public companies as well, who are trying to make

0:13:12.080 --> 0:13:15.480
<v Speaker 1>acquisitions at all levels. I think a lot of people

0:13:15.520 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 1>think public companies only buy billion dollar businesses, but the

0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:22.360
<v Speaker 1>reality is, if there's a strategic fit, they might look

0:13:22.360 --> 0:13:24.840
<v Speaker 1>at a five million dollar business, a ten million dollar business,

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:28.720
<v Speaker 1>fifty million dollar market cap business. And then a lot

0:13:28.720 --> 0:13:31.360
<v Speaker 1>of individuals are like very small funds. You might not

0:13:31.360 --> 0:13:34.559
<v Speaker 1>necessarily call them private equity, but they're kind of successful

0:13:34.600 --> 0:13:37.880
<v Speaker 1>individuals or partnerships have raised a small amount of money

0:13:37.880 --> 0:13:40.400
<v Speaker 1>to buy a business as well. Particularly in the US,

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:43.000
<v Speaker 1>that's a very active demographic of buyer.

0:13:43.559 --> 0:13:47.000
<v Speaker 3>Okay, So looking forward to twenty twenty four, are there

0:13:47.000 --> 0:13:50.760
<v Speaker 3>any particular sectors that you deal with that look better

0:13:50.920 --> 0:13:54.440
<v Speaker 3>than others? Where is the deal activity in terms of that.

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:56.800
<v Speaker 1>So I think that the big trend at the moment

0:13:56.920 --> 0:13:59.800
<v Speaker 1>is anything related to AI. And I think the interesting

0:13:59.800 --> 0:14:04.040
<v Speaker 1>thing about AI is, even if you don't necessarily understand it,

0:14:04.120 --> 0:14:06.600
<v Speaker 1>every single business out there has a way they can

0:14:07.080 --> 0:14:10.920
<v Speaker 1>improve with the use of AI. Lots of other kind

0:14:10.920 --> 0:14:12.960
<v Speaker 1>of sub industries that have come up over the years

0:14:13.360 --> 0:14:17.160
<v Speaker 1>have not necessarily had that kind of ability to be

0:14:17.160 --> 0:14:21.120
<v Speaker 1>applied in literally every business. So lots of companies we're

0:14:21.160 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 1>working with or acquiers that come to us and say, hey,

0:14:23.680 --> 0:14:26.720
<v Speaker 1>we're looking to buy a business interest in AI, either

0:14:26.760 --> 0:14:29.120
<v Speaker 1>to augment what they already have, so maybe they can

0:14:29.120 --> 0:14:30.960
<v Speaker 1>add some tools or even like a team to their

0:14:30.960 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>existing kind of business or whatever they might have, so

0:14:35.600 --> 0:14:38.960
<v Speaker 1>you can augment that by adding AI, or maybe if

0:14:39.000 --> 0:14:42.680
<v Speaker 1>you're building a business in the AI space, it's a

0:14:42.720 --> 0:14:45.280
<v Speaker 1>great time to sell because it's such a hot market.

0:14:45.400 --> 0:14:48.360
<v Speaker 1>So at the moment, we have a nine figure transaction

0:14:48.440 --> 0:14:52.280
<v Speaker 1>we're representing. They've built the business in three years to

0:14:52.360 --> 0:14:57.160
<v Speaker 1>over twenty million in revenue, no outside funding, currently actively

0:14:57.200 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 1>looking for a buyer, and it's so far extremely interesting

0:15:01.720 --> 0:15:04.280
<v Speaker 1>with buyers just because of the amount of kind of

0:15:04.360 --> 0:15:05.440
<v Speaker 1>AI focus it has.

0:15:05.920 --> 0:15:07.960
<v Speaker 5>Last one here a few of Thomas, And we've been

0:15:08.000 --> 0:15:10.040
<v Speaker 5>talking a bit about earlier in the show about the

0:15:10.080 --> 0:15:13.360
<v Speaker 5>regulatory outlook for M and A, especially with the Jeb

0:15:13.360 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 5>Blue and Spirit deal that didn't come through. So tell

0:15:16.520 --> 0:15:19.040
<v Speaker 5>us a little bit about that from your perspective, and

0:15:19.480 --> 0:15:21.840
<v Speaker 5>especially if we're heading into an election year and maybe

0:15:21.840 --> 0:15:23.400
<v Speaker 5>that administration could change.

0:15:23.680 --> 0:15:27.440
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, So I think buyers are always aware of political changes,

0:15:27.480 --> 0:15:30.520
<v Speaker 1>and that's not just necessarily in the US. That's geopolitically.

0:15:30.520 --> 0:15:35.600
<v Speaker 1>There's things all over the world that could affect effect deals.

0:15:35.640 --> 0:15:38.800
<v Speaker 1>So from that perspective, buyers will always be thinking about it.

0:15:38.880 --> 0:15:41.560
<v Speaker 1>Regulatory risk is very much specific to the industry you

0:15:41.640 --> 0:15:44.640
<v Speaker 1>might be working within. So recently we worked on a

0:15:44.640 --> 0:15:48.720
<v Speaker 1>business in the CBD space, which we successfully sold, but

0:15:49.160 --> 0:15:53.080
<v Speaker 1>there's constant regulatory changes with CBD. So if you're an

0:15:53.120 --> 0:15:56.800
<v Speaker 1>acquirer looking to buy businesses in that space, either you're

0:15:56.800 --> 0:16:00.640
<v Speaker 1>going to be extremely confident and knowledgeable of that industry,

0:16:01.120 --> 0:16:02.680
<v Speaker 1>or you're going to do a lot of extra research

0:16:02.680 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 1>into what might necessarily change or what could potentially change

0:16:06.680 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 1>in future, or maybe you'll even risk adjust your offer

0:16:09.320 --> 0:16:12.080
<v Speaker 1>and say, well, there's regulatory risk in this market, we're

0:16:12.120 --> 0:16:13.720
<v Speaker 1>going to pay less for that business.

0:16:14.120 --> 0:16:16.800
<v Speaker 3>Thomas A pleasure and thanks for stopping by in the

0:16:16.920 --> 0:16:20.640
<v Speaker 3>in studio guest A gold star for Thomas Smoe, CEO

0:16:20.840 --> 0:16:23.560
<v Speaker 3>of FI International Advising on.

0:16:24.080 --> 0:16:24.440
<v Speaker 7>M and A.

0:16:25.400 --> 0:16:29.040
<v Speaker 6>You're listening to the tape Cansur live program Bloomberg Markets

0:16:29.080 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 6>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the tune

0:16:32.520 --> 0:16:34.280
<v Speaker 6>in app, Bloomberg dot Com.

0:16:34.040 --> 0:16:35.480
<v Speaker 7>And the Bloomberg Business App.

0:16:35.520 --> 0:16:38.320
<v Speaker 6>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:16:38.360 --> 0:16:42.720
<v Speaker 6>flagship New York station, Just Say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven.

0:16:42.440 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 3>Thirty Joining us now Robert Stein, Managing director partner at

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:51.760
<v Speaker 3>Blankie Shine Wealth Management. How does an investor play this?

0:16:52.800 --> 0:16:57.280
<v Speaker 3>Back and forth? Fed going to cut March Now it's later,

0:16:57.880 --> 0:17:01.360
<v Speaker 3>fewer cuts maybe what how do you view all this?

0:17:02.800 --> 0:17:05.320
<v Speaker 8>Well, good morning, John and Molly, And I think if

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:07.040
<v Speaker 8>we go back a month ago, when I was in

0:17:07.080 --> 0:17:11.080
<v Speaker 8>the Bloomberg Radio studios, I did say that, you know,

0:17:11.280 --> 0:17:15.760
<v Speaker 8>the markets were anticipating and asking for in twenty twenty

0:17:15.800 --> 0:17:19.480
<v Speaker 8>four a rate cut. In fact, obviously you saw equity markets,

0:17:19.520 --> 0:17:23.439
<v Speaker 8>risk assets price that in super aggressively. We were in

0:17:23.440 --> 0:17:25.720
<v Speaker 8>the camp of as I said then, and I still

0:17:25.720 --> 0:17:28.520
<v Speaker 8>believe that it's going to be higher for longer, and

0:17:28.560 --> 0:17:30.920
<v Speaker 8>the federers are going to have to walk that tightrope

0:17:30.960 --> 0:17:33.760
<v Speaker 8>simply because if you look at the sort of trajectory

0:17:33.760 --> 0:17:37.760
<v Speaker 8>of inflation through history, you get two humps of inflation,

0:17:37.880 --> 0:17:41.040
<v Speaker 8>and the FED can't pull down sort of the interest

0:17:41.119 --> 0:17:44.600
<v Speaker 8>rate to re ignite some of the inflationary pressures. They

0:17:44.600 --> 0:17:48.200
<v Speaker 8>have to ensure that inflation is anchored before they go ahead.

0:17:48.200 --> 0:17:50.760
<v Speaker 8>I mean about seventy eight percent of the time historically speaking,

0:17:50.920 --> 0:17:53.879
<v Speaker 8>inflation comes in two waves. So you know what the

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 8>FED basically is done now is that for twenty twenty four,

0:17:56.960 --> 0:17:59.280
<v Speaker 8>it's not a no on rate hikes. It's no for

0:17:59.359 --> 0:17:59.879
<v Speaker 8>right now.

0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:04.080
<v Speaker 5>How much do you think of the disinflation we've seen

0:18:04.119 --> 0:18:06.200
<v Speaker 5>that the FED can really take credit for. This is

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:08.240
<v Speaker 5>something I've been wondering and I feel like so much

0:18:08.280 --> 0:18:11.320
<v Speaker 5>of it has just been like the supply side normalizing,

0:18:11.400 --> 0:18:14.600
<v Speaker 5>you know, since from those big COVID disruptions and a

0:18:14.600 --> 0:18:17.000
<v Speaker 5>lot of those supply chains getting back in order. Do

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:19.480
<v Speaker 5>you really think, though, Rob, that these at the FED

0:18:19.520 --> 0:18:21.280
<v Speaker 5>can take credit for a lot of what we've seen.

0:18:22.560 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 8>Yeah, I think we've been We're in a territory including

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:28.560
<v Speaker 8>the FED, that no one has ever seen before. So

0:18:29.040 --> 0:18:31.760
<v Speaker 8>you know, retail is working through that, services are working

0:18:31.800 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 8>through that, Federal reserve, businesses are working through that. You know,

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:37.840
<v Speaker 8>one thing's good is this supply chain got tighter and

0:18:37.880 --> 0:18:40.480
<v Speaker 8>then I got sort of a lot more efficient, if

0:18:40.480 --> 0:18:42.879
<v Speaker 8>you will, And I think a lot of businesses became

0:18:42.920 --> 0:18:45.199
<v Speaker 8>a lot more efficient even moving forward. So that's going

0:18:45.280 --> 0:18:47.720
<v Speaker 8>to be leading to greater profitability for a lot of

0:18:47.760 --> 0:18:50.280
<v Speaker 8>businesses that learn through COVID. But if you look at

0:18:50.280 --> 0:18:52.840
<v Speaker 8>the shift in consumption, and two thirds of the economy

0:18:53.000 --> 0:18:57.600
<v Speaker 8>is consumption, it's basically the services sector that's still seeing

0:18:57.640 --> 0:19:00.280
<v Speaker 8>that spike up. Look at airline prices, look at all

0:19:00.280 --> 0:19:03.640
<v Speaker 8>the inflationary prices where people are like shifting their spending.

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 8>We just got retail sales goods. You know, American consumer

0:19:07.080 --> 0:19:09.160
<v Speaker 8>will always find a way, whether it's the credit card

0:19:09.240 --> 0:19:11.960
<v Speaker 8>or whether it's the savings that they had saved up to.

0:19:12.240 --> 0:19:15.080
<v Speaker 8>You know, make certain that Christmas is still Christmas at home.

0:19:15.480 --> 0:19:17.320
<v Speaker 8>But it's going to take some time to see we're

0:19:17.359 --> 0:19:19.679
<v Speaker 8>going to see a lot more pressure build on the consumer.

0:19:19.920 --> 0:19:22.359
<v Speaker 8>But the shift in spending is quite clear. It's still

0:19:22.400 --> 0:19:23.760
<v Speaker 8>services for this year.

0:19:24.359 --> 0:19:27.720
<v Speaker 3>Okay, we can definitely say there is something of a

0:19:27.800 --> 0:19:30.680
<v Speaker 3>pivot the degree to which you can argue about and

0:19:30.920 --> 0:19:35.560
<v Speaker 3>we're definitely headed towards that two percent, although with maybe

0:19:35.600 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 3>fits and starts, so a disinflationary environment or outright deflation

0:19:40.400 --> 0:19:43.560
<v Speaker 3>in some sectors. I asked this of all our equity guests,

0:19:43.800 --> 0:19:47.200
<v Speaker 3>what does that mean for earnings, especially the top line

0:19:47.280 --> 0:19:48.360
<v Speaker 3>sales growth.

0:19:49.840 --> 0:19:50.280
<v Speaker 7>Earnings?

0:19:50.280 --> 0:19:53.000
<v Speaker 8>If you look at you know again, that's going to

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:55.080
<v Speaker 8>be at the forefront. We just had the two biggest

0:19:55.080 --> 0:19:58.240
<v Speaker 8>points you know, a year to date. As it relates

0:19:58.240 --> 0:20:01.920
<v Speaker 8>to CPI information as well as market it's not exactly

0:20:01.960 --> 0:20:03.880
<v Speaker 8>going in the right direction in terms of as much

0:20:04.000 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 8>movement as the FED needs to see, but the earnings

0:20:07.359 --> 0:20:10.080
<v Speaker 8>is on the forefront. And corporations. If you look at

0:20:10.119 --> 0:20:13.840
<v Speaker 8>tech two years ago, tech literally started laying off in

0:20:13.880 --> 0:20:17.160
<v Speaker 8>anticipation of a recession. We're looking at banks right now.

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:19.480
<v Speaker 8>At the end of last year they started laying off.

0:20:19.880 --> 0:20:24.200
<v Speaker 8>So it's basically a rolling sector recession. You know, pick

0:20:24.240 --> 0:20:26.840
<v Speaker 8>your company, but a lot of companies are basically being

0:20:26.840 --> 0:20:31.200
<v Speaker 8>a lot more conservative now that job's number is basically

0:20:31.240 --> 0:20:33.040
<v Speaker 8>the you know, not going in the direction that the

0:20:33.080 --> 0:20:36.040
<v Speaker 8>FED needs it as quickly as as at least the

0:20:36.040 --> 0:20:36.840
<v Speaker 8>markets would like it.

0:20:37.000 --> 0:20:39.119
<v Speaker 7>So interest rates could come down quicker.

0:20:39.359 --> 0:20:43.240
<v Speaker 5>So a rolling sector recession, does that mean we're in

0:20:43.280 --> 0:20:47.560
<v Speaker 5>some an actual economic recession or heading toward one.

0:20:48.119 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 8>I don't know if that'll actually transpire. If you look

0:20:51.320 --> 0:20:55.280
<v Speaker 8>at the last two years, different sectors have had recessions

0:20:55.320 --> 0:20:57.760
<v Speaker 8>at different times. That's why I think this time is

0:20:57.800 --> 0:21:01.640
<v Speaker 8>different from a quote unquote recession standpoint. I know we've

0:21:01.640 --> 0:21:03.639
<v Speaker 8>been waiting for about a year and a half holding

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:06.439
<v Speaker 8>our breath for the official data to come out. But

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:09.280
<v Speaker 8>if you look at the different sectors and the performance

0:21:09.280 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 8>of the different sectors, outperformance in some and underperformance in others,

0:21:13.800 --> 0:21:16.040
<v Speaker 8>I think sectors, that's where you have to sort of

0:21:16.080 --> 0:21:20.080
<v Speaker 8>be tactical in your performance of your acid allocation. As

0:21:20.119 --> 0:21:22.800
<v Speaker 8>you look into the market for twenty twenty four, the

0:21:22.920 --> 0:21:25.360
<v Speaker 8>sectors that perform the best on a relative basis, let's

0:21:25.359 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 8>say technology are still going to perform well this year,

0:21:28.040 --> 0:21:31.480
<v Speaker 8>but relatively other sectors will sort of come back, let's

0:21:31.480 --> 0:21:35.119
<v Speaker 8>call it healthcare, energy. I think those are times to

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 8>start looking at overwaiting those sectors for twenty twenty four.

0:21:38.240 --> 0:21:41.000
<v Speaker 3>Okay, so I put all that into the blender, turn

0:21:41.080 --> 0:21:43.360
<v Speaker 3>it on high. What do I come up with? Where

0:21:43.400 --> 0:21:45.080
<v Speaker 3>do where am I going to put my money.

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:49.120
<v Speaker 8>Again, the sixty forty sort of acid allocation is where

0:21:49.119 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 8>we're at. We like about a ten percent allocation within

0:21:52.680 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 8>that forty within alternative investments. But I really like energy

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 8>for the first six months. I think obviously the geopolitical

0:21:59.600 --> 0:22:03.399
<v Speaker 8>tensions that we're seeing earnings growth in that sector alone

0:22:03.440 --> 0:22:05.840
<v Speaker 8>as up forty percent in the last four years. And

0:22:05.880 --> 0:22:08.440
<v Speaker 8>then you also have buybacks. I mean, their dividend rich

0:22:08.560 --> 0:22:11.719
<v Speaker 8>right now, and so where they're gonna basically have that

0:22:11.760 --> 0:22:14.639
<v Speaker 8>free cash flow is how they're going to allocate that.

0:22:15.040 --> 0:22:17.000
<v Speaker 8>And we believe there's a lot of value there plus

0:22:17.040 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 8>a lot of m and a activity that we saw

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 8>is going to be a creative So we like the

0:22:20.400 --> 0:22:24.600
<v Speaker 8>energy sector moving forward. And then healthcare. Healthcare again just

0:22:24.800 --> 0:22:28.120
<v Speaker 8>like energy is going to prevent a present a lot

0:22:28.160 --> 0:22:30.919
<v Speaker 8>of value plus dividends you get paid while you eight.

0:22:31.560 --> 0:22:33.840
<v Speaker 5>So Robert, just on our last thirty seconds or so,

0:22:33.960 --> 0:22:36.439
<v Speaker 5>here just have to confirm you you're coming to us

0:22:36.480 --> 0:22:40.960
<v Speaker 5>from Palm Desert, California today? Is that right? Okay?

0:22:41.320 --> 0:22:43.520
<v Speaker 3>Tell me is that the t is that a TV

0:22:43.680 --> 0:22:47.439
<v Speaker 3>screen or your window in the background, to be honest,

0:22:48.320 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 3>but if you.

0:22:48.840 --> 0:22:51.560
<v Speaker 8>Look right through us We've got basically a Palm Desert

0:22:51.600 --> 0:22:54.600
<v Speaker 8>chamber of commerce. You know, snow cap mountains out here.

0:22:54.800 --> 0:22:56.400
<v Speaker 8>It's seventy degrees, so come on out.

0:22:56.680 --> 0:22:59.200
<v Speaker 5>And also nearby is a beautiful tennis center, which I

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:01.080
<v Speaker 5>got to ask, are you going to be at Indian

0:23:01.160 --> 0:23:01.960
<v Speaker 5>Wells in March.

0:23:02.720 --> 0:23:07.720
<v Speaker 8>We love the Indian Wells tennis event. It's the first

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:10.400
<v Speaker 8>class event, and it's international and it's growing every year,

0:23:10.480 --> 0:23:11.960
<v Speaker 8>so it's a perfect time to hear.

0:23:12.880 --> 0:23:14.639
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that's big on my list for next year. This

0:23:14.760 --> 0:23:16.080
<v Speaker 5>year going to Miami Open.

0:23:16.160 --> 0:23:17.199
<v Speaker 3>Now back to tennis for you.

0:23:17.440 --> 0:23:19.639
<v Speaker 5>It has to We haven't even talked about the Australian

0:23:19.680 --> 0:23:22.600
<v Speaker 5>Open yet. It's really just a huge oversight on our part.

0:23:22.640 --> 0:23:24.920
<v Speaker 5>We will be getting that to you everyone. Don't worry, Bob.

0:23:24.960 --> 0:23:27.320
<v Speaker 3>Thanks a lot. I appreciate it. Robert Scheine, Managing director

0:23:27.320 --> 0:23:30.320
<v Speaker 3>and partner at Blankie Shine Wealth Management.

0:23:30.560 --> 0:23:33.680
<v Speaker 6>You're listening to the tape Cat's are live program Bloomberg

0:23:33.760 --> 0:23:37.359
<v Speaker 6>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, the

0:23:37.400 --> 0:23:39.360
<v Speaker 6>tune in app, Bloomberg dot Com, and.

0:23:39.359 --> 0:23:40.640
<v Speaker 7>The Bloomberg Business App.

0:23:40.680 --> 0:23:43.520
<v Speaker 6>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:23:43.520 --> 0:23:48.520
<v Speaker 6>flagship New York station. Just say Alexa playing Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:23:49.520 --> 0:23:52.240
<v Speaker 3>Goldman Sachs recently raised six hundred and fifty million dollars

0:23:52.240 --> 0:23:55.919
<v Speaker 3>for investing in life sciences startups. Is this an area

0:23:56.000 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 3>for you? Let's say asker next Kuss Zoe penn in

0:23:59.840 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 3>the partner at Lenanda Impact Ventures. She's joining us from

0:24:04.359 --> 0:24:06.679
<v Speaker 3>all these guests in locations like I want to be

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:10.080
<v Speaker 3>Harry True you go to Antarctica then? And where do

0:24:10.160 --> 0:24:11.160
<v Speaker 3>you then? Mexico.

0:24:11.440 --> 0:24:14.639
<v Speaker 5>I'm telling you the bachelorette parties are killer. But Zoe

0:24:14.680 --> 0:24:16.439
<v Speaker 5>Patten joined us from Spain today.

0:24:17.280 --> 0:24:18.120
<v Speaker 3>Nice when us.

0:24:18.040 --> 0:24:19.440
<v Speaker 5>Star day, Zoey, what's up?

0:24:20.680 --> 0:24:23.119
<v Speaker 9>I'm doing well here? Thank you very warm.

0:24:23.560 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 3>So let's ask you on the on the risk spectrum,

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:31.399
<v Speaker 3>where do startups in health, nature and biotech? Where do

0:24:31.480 --> 0:24:32.320
<v Speaker 3>they lie.

0:24:34.359 --> 0:24:37.520
<v Speaker 9>Risk? So when a Hernanda we invest in very early

0:24:37.560 --> 0:24:43.160
<v Speaker 9>stage impact ventures across all those areas, and it is

0:24:43.280 --> 0:24:45.320
<v Speaker 9>it is we are very early stage. So it is

0:24:45.400 --> 0:24:47.399
<v Speaker 9>high risk. I mean that's bench capital for you.

0:24:48.640 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 5>How much is it?

0:24:50.440 --> 0:24:53.320
<v Speaker 3>But high reward If if you get a home run

0:24:53.440 --> 0:24:56.159
<v Speaker 3>up one of these, how many home runs do you get? Typically?

0:24:58.040 --> 0:25:01.840
<v Speaker 9>So in VC, you're looking in a portfolio of twenty

0:25:01.840 --> 0:25:06.720
<v Speaker 9>five to thirty maybe two max. But that's the name

0:25:06.760 --> 0:25:09.240
<v Speaker 9>of the game, and everybody who works in this industry

0:25:09.320 --> 0:25:10.080
<v Speaker 9>knows that the.

0:25:10.119 --> 0:25:13.959
<v Speaker 5>Past the numbers game. Yes, that's right. Well, I mean

0:25:14.040 --> 0:25:15.800
<v Speaker 5>tell us about some of the home runs you've had

0:25:15.840 --> 0:25:18.000
<v Speaker 5>and like to what extent you can tell us about them.

0:25:20.200 --> 0:25:23.000
<v Speaker 9>So some of the areas that we've investing in. In

0:25:23.080 --> 0:25:25.600
<v Speaker 9>terms of the life sciences that you were asking about,

0:25:25.680 --> 0:25:29.160
<v Speaker 9>We've got a company called Closed Loop Medicine, and this

0:25:29.200 --> 0:25:32.960
<v Speaker 9>one deals with dosage. So when you take a pill,

0:25:33.400 --> 0:25:36.960
<v Speaker 9>everybody's taking the same dosage, get an adult dosage and

0:25:37.000 --> 0:25:39.320
<v Speaker 9>a child dosage. But we're not all made of the

0:25:39.359 --> 0:25:42.800
<v Speaker 9>same things. Our biology is very unique to each of

0:25:42.840 --> 0:25:45.240
<v Speaker 9>us and as a result, many of us get side effects.

0:25:45.640 --> 0:25:48.359
<v Speaker 9>And you know, if you go back to how drugs

0:25:48.359 --> 0:25:50.960
<v Speaker 9>are designed back in the seventies and eighties, there were

0:25:50.960 --> 0:25:54.000
<v Speaker 9>not many women involved in those clinical trials, so many

0:25:54.040 --> 0:25:58.280
<v Speaker 9>of the drugs that we take have much more exaggerated

0:25:58.400 --> 0:26:02.080
<v Speaker 9>impact on female bodies too. So Closely Medicine works with

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:07.359
<v Speaker 9>pharmaceutical companies to do personalized digital dosage, so that's using

0:26:07.520 --> 0:26:10.840
<v Speaker 9>artificial intelligence and tracking lots of data. So that's that's

0:26:10.880 --> 0:26:14.920
<v Speaker 9>one of the ones. And then another one called resistant Map.

0:26:15.080 --> 0:26:17.399
<v Speaker 9>It's a very recent investment that we've done so very

0:26:17.520 --> 0:26:21.240
<v Speaker 9>very early. But you know, with the recent pandemic, everybody's

0:26:21.280 --> 0:26:25.480
<v Speaker 9>become much more aware of beneath for biosecurity and how

0:26:25.640 --> 0:26:29.920
<v Speaker 9>pathogens can be used as a weapon. You know, quite

0:26:29.960 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 9>worrying really, And one of the next pandemic that nobody

0:26:33.800 --> 0:26:38.200
<v Speaker 9>really talks about is antibiotic resistance. So what resistant map

0:26:38.200 --> 0:26:40.960
<v Speaker 9>does is it's able to map all the different strains

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:44.720
<v Speaker 9>and say where all over the world where you've got

0:26:45.000 --> 0:26:48.040
<v Speaker 9>the worst antibiotic resistance. To make people aware of this.

0:26:48.640 --> 0:26:51.639
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, we you know, especially with my kids, it's like

0:26:51.720 --> 0:26:54.119
<v Speaker 3>every time they went to the doctors, they get a

0:26:54.160 --> 0:26:57.240
<v Speaker 3>Marxist cylind or some antibiotic and you had to start

0:26:57.280 --> 0:27:01.960
<v Speaker 3>wondering about like the resistance levels and what the ultimate

0:27:02.080 --> 0:27:05.640
<v Speaker 3>result of that is. Hey, as an average joke, can

0:27:05.680 --> 0:27:06.960
<v Speaker 3>I get in on the ground floor?

0:27:08.760 --> 0:27:11.680
<v Speaker 9>Can you get in the ground floor in impact investing

0:27:11.800 --> 0:27:12.639
<v Speaker 9>or life science?

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:14.840
<v Speaker 3>Well, any of the companies that you're talking about.

0:27:15.040 --> 0:27:15.640
<v Speaker 7>This is like.

0:27:17.440 --> 0:27:19.320
<v Speaker 3>I want to get rich too, incredible.

0:27:19.720 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 9>Yeah, I'm sure, I'm sure, I think we all but no,

0:27:22.560 --> 0:27:25.000
<v Speaker 9>it's important not just getting rich. It's about having impact

0:27:25.000 --> 0:27:28.119
<v Speaker 9>as well, and making things at a better place, better

0:27:28.160 --> 0:27:32.920
<v Speaker 9>healthcare for everybody, more accessible, and yeah, better lives for everyone.

0:27:33.400 --> 0:27:35.399
<v Speaker 9>That's what impact investing is all about.

0:27:35.720 --> 0:27:37.400
<v Speaker 5>I've got to think that there's got to be some

0:27:37.520 --> 0:27:40.240
<v Speaker 5>kind of AI application here, So tell us a little

0:27:40.240 --> 0:27:42.440
<v Speaker 5>bit how that's coming into your space, and if that's

0:27:42.480 --> 0:27:42.800
<v Speaker 5>all the.

0:27:43.280 --> 0:27:47.000
<v Speaker 3>Intersection of AI and life sciences, et cetera.

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:50.240
<v Speaker 5>I don't know that SEMs right got my attention. All right, Well,

0:27:50.440 --> 0:27:52.199
<v Speaker 5>all right, well John wants to know about it, So

0:27:52.240 --> 0:27:53.800
<v Speaker 5>tell John what's going on there?

0:27:54.920 --> 0:27:57.800
<v Speaker 9>Okay? So, I mean, we've just seen this money all

0:27:57.840 --> 0:28:00.720
<v Speaker 9>going into from gold and Sacks, and I must say

0:28:00.720 --> 0:28:02.360
<v Speaker 9>it's not the only big fund that they've got. They've

0:28:02.359 --> 0:28:05.200
<v Speaker 9>also got a climate fund as well. So Goldman Sachs

0:28:05.200 --> 0:28:08.480
<v Speaker 9>are making some interesting moves just generally and not just

0:28:08.560 --> 0:28:12.080
<v Speaker 9>in the life sciences. But we've seen lots of people

0:28:12.080 --> 0:28:15.320
<v Speaker 9>go into the life sciences twenty years ago similarly as

0:28:15.320 --> 0:28:18.320
<v Speaker 9>they did with clean tech, and get quite bruised. So

0:28:18.640 --> 0:28:22.040
<v Speaker 9>the question is why are we seeing this again? So yeah,

0:28:22.080 --> 0:28:25.640
<v Speaker 9>that's where the AI comes in, making it cheaper quicker

0:28:25.760 --> 0:28:30.119
<v Speaker 9>to build models using existing data and synthetic data. And

0:28:30.160 --> 0:28:32.959
<v Speaker 9>then your previous person that you had in the studio

0:28:33.119 --> 0:28:37.640
<v Speaker 9>talking about compute power too, So in relevance to life sciences,

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:40.520
<v Speaker 9>you've got the ability to build new biological and chemical

0:28:40.680 --> 0:28:44.480
<v Speaker 9>models as well having this extra compute power. But what's

0:28:44.520 --> 0:28:47.040
<v Speaker 9>also interesting, and I think this is where Goldman Sachs

0:28:47.360 --> 0:28:50.320
<v Speaker 9>are picking up, is as market forces as well. We're

0:28:50.320 --> 0:28:54.480
<v Speaker 9>seeing this trickle down effect and from the big tech players,

0:28:54.480 --> 0:28:58.240
<v Speaker 9>there's Magnificent seven that we're calling them now investing heavily

0:28:58.280 --> 0:29:01.480
<v Speaker 9>into this space. So you've got six out of those

0:29:01.560 --> 0:29:06.320
<v Speaker 9>seven from the Minnixent seven investing in healthcare and AI

0:29:06.440 --> 0:29:10.240
<v Speaker 9>and life sciences. Just to give you one example which

0:29:10.280 --> 0:29:13.320
<v Speaker 9>I'm sure people are hearing about on the news, so Google,

0:29:13.440 --> 0:29:17.800
<v Speaker 9>Google D nine spinout isomorphic Labs, so they're reducing the

0:29:17.880 --> 0:29:22.840
<v Speaker 9>time for drug discovery, fining two large deals worth nearly

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:27.080
<v Speaker 9>three billion dollars with Eli Lilly and the artists. So

0:29:27.200 --> 0:29:31.640
<v Speaker 9>that's really interesting. Revenue apparently coming in quite early on,

0:29:31.640 --> 0:29:35.040
<v Speaker 9>which we didn't see with that first trend twenty years ago.

0:29:35.080 --> 0:29:38.680
<v Speaker 9>In the early two thousands, they were mostly developing single assets,

0:29:38.960 --> 0:29:42.680
<v Speaker 9>single drugs. So if it doesn't work out, you spend

0:29:42.680 --> 0:29:45.360
<v Speaker 9>an awful lot of money at the beginning stage to

0:29:45.440 --> 0:29:47.840
<v Speaker 9>then lose a lot, so extremely high risk. So what

0:29:47.880 --> 0:29:51.520
<v Speaker 9>we're seeing is we're reducing that risk by being able

0:29:51.040 --> 0:29:56.800
<v Speaker 9>to discover more potential drugs using artificial intelligence, increase data,

0:29:56.880 --> 0:29:59.760
<v Speaker 9>to reduce the risk at every single stage of a

0:29:59.760 --> 0:30:02.680
<v Speaker 9>life science business. And I think that's why you're seeing

0:30:02.720 --> 0:30:07.200
<v Speaker 9>now Goldman Sachs and many other people forging back into

0:30:07.480 --> 0:30:11.440
<v Speaker 9>life sciences, which is a very very impactful area. So

0:30:11.480 --> 0:30:13.160
<v Speaker 9>the more money that goes into this and the more

0:30:13.240 --> 0:30:16.160
<v Speaker 9>chances we have success, this is a very good thing

0:30:16.240 --> 0:30:16.920
<v Speaker 9>for everyone.

0:30:17.520 --> 0:30:20.640
<v Speaker 3>Zoe, Do these companies come to you or do you

0:30:21.080 --> 0:30:23.720
<v Speaker 3>go scout these companies out? How does that work?

0:30:24.720 --> 0:30:29.080
<v Speaker 9>Oh, it's always a bit of both. Actually, what we

0:30:29.280 --> 0:30:32.640
<v Speaker 9>like to do with Hernandez we have certain megatrends that

0:30:32.680 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 9>we go for, So we've got certain fields and different

0:30:35.360 --> 0:30:38.240
<v Speaker 9>areas of impact that we feel are the hot areas

0:30:38.240 --> 0:30:40.680
<v Speaker 9>over the next five to ten years. And for instance,

0:30:40.720 --> 0:30:43.600
<v Speaker 9>we've started to focus a lot of time now into

0:30:43.640 --> 0:30:47.080
<v Speaker 9>tech bio companies. So this is does come under life

0:30:47.120 --> 0:30:50.200
<v Speaker 9>sciences in its one particular area, which is more about

0:30:50.320 --> 0:30:57.200
<v Speaker 9>computational biology, so using AI with biology so that it's

0:30:57.440 --> 0:31:01.280
<v Speaker 9>the less capital intensive end of the life science is

0:31:01.360 --> 0:31:04.600
<v Speaker 9>just let's say that, and that's where we're expanding our field,

0:31:04.640 --> 0:31:07.960
<v Speaker 9>and we will often go out and look to the universities,

0:31:08.320 --> 0:31:10.880
<v Speaker 9>work with the angel investors who have a background in

0:31:10.920 --> 0:31:14.440
<v Speaker 9>this area, and go out and find as much as

0:31:14.480 --> 0:31:16.480
<v Speaker 9>we do they come to us. So it's a pretty

0:31:16.520 --> 0:31:18.320
<v Speaker 9>much a half and half sourcing strategy.

0:31:18.680 --> 0:31:20.760
<v Speaker 5>So, Zoe, you started out by telling us that, you know,

0:31:20.840 --> 0:31:23.720
<v Speaker 5>for every twenty five or so strikes, maybe two or

0:31:23.720 --> 0:31:26.280
<v Speaker 5>three of them hit. So it's obviously a lot of

0:31:26.320 --> 0:31:27.760
<v Speaker 5>them that don't work out. I know, we don't like

0:31:27.800 --> 0:31:30.479
<v Speaker 5>to harp on our you know, misfortunes, but can you

0:31:30.520 --> 0:31:33.160
<v Speaker 5>tell us about maybe some of these that haven't worked

0:31:33.160 --> 0:31:37.200
<v Speaker 5>out for you guys?

0:31:37.240 --> 0:31:41.920
<v Speaker 9>Difficult to name names right now, but what will tend

0:31:41.960 --> 0:31:46.760
<v Speaker 9>to happen is just it's kind of they've gone for

0:31:46.800 --> 0:31:49.800
<v Speaker 9>a single asset strategy. If you're talking about life sciences,

0:31:49.880 --> 0:31:52.640
<v Speaker 9>you spend a lot of money up front, and if

0:31:52.640 --> 0:31:55.320
<v Speaker 9>that one doesn't turn out to have the product market fits,

0:31:55.400 --> 0:31:57.880
<v Speaker 9>so people are not willing to pay at that point.

0:31:57.880 --> 0:31:59.520
<v Speaker 9>But you've had to spend a lot of money and

0:31:59.640 --> 0:32:01.760
<v Speaker 9>you run out of money. But it's as simple as

0:32:01.800 --> 0:32:04.480
<v Speaker 9>that with the life sciences. So that's why many of

0:32:04.520 --> 0:32:07.760
<v Speaker 9>them haven't worked out in the past. But like I

0:32:07.760 --> 0:32:10.160
<v Speaker 9>was saying, with everything that's happening now, you get more

0:32:10.160 --> 0:32:13.720
<v Speaker 9>bites at the cherry with artificial intelligence in these companies.

0:32:13.760 --> 0:32:16.720
<v Speaker 9>So it's reducing that risk and being able to spot

0:32:16.800 --> 0:32:19.680
<v Speaker 9>what's not going to make it. Just saying, you know,

0:32:19.920 --> 0:32:22.920
<v Speaker 9>time is the most precious thing for these entrepreneurs as

0:32:22.920 --> 0:32:25.960
<v Speaker 9>well as investors. If you're not going to work out,

0:32:26.160 --> 0:32:28.920
<v Speaker 9>let them go again. Let them build on the failures

0:32:28.920 --> 0:32:31.160
<v Speaker 9>of that one, because you know, all science is built

0:32:31.160 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 9>on the the you know, on the shoulders of many

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:35.880
<v Speaker 9>of those that have gone before. Let them roll again

0:32:36.040 --> 0:32:40.920
<v Speaker 9>into another one. So failure is not the disaster as

0:32:41.000 --> 0:32:44.080
<v Speaker 9>many see it would be painted. It's just the next stage.

0:32:44.320 --> 0:32:46.320
<v Speaker 3>So we have pleasure to talk to you, appreciate you

0:32:46.400 --> 0:32:50.320
<v Speaker 3>start in buying. So we our partner ed Ata Impact Ventures,

0:32:50.360 --> 0:32:52.240
<v Speaker 3>joining us from some jealous Spain.

0:32:53.840 --> 0:32:57.720
<v Speaker 6>You're listening to the Team Cancer Live program Bloomberg Markets

0:32:57.760 --> 0:33:01.960
<v Speaker 6>weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg, the iHeartRadio app

0:33:02.000 --> 0:33:04.920
<v Speaker 6>and the Bloomberg Business app, or listen on demand wherever

0:33:04.960 --> 0:33:06.080
<v Speaker 6>you get your podcast.

0:33:08.360 --> 0:33:12.080
<v Speaker 3>Can I say jaw dropping data this morning on retail sales?

0:33:12.320 --> 0:33:12.520
<v Speaker 9>Yeah?

0:33:12.600 --> 0:33:12.920
<v Speaker 5>Why not?

0:33:13.360 --> 0:33:16.760
<v Speaker 3>I mean it was just like, way off expectations.

0:33:16.920 --> 0:33:19.960
<v Speaker 5>We look, the consumer, you know, loves to surprise. Isn't

0:33:19.960 --> 0:33:22.480
<v Speaker 5>that no recession? That's been the story, John.

0:33:22.400 --> 0:33:24.239
<v Speaker 3>Or I think, as I put it, the consumers not

0:33:24.280 --> 0:33:25.160
<v Speaker 3>falling off a cliff.

0:33:25.280 --> 0:33:27.719
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, that was your crystal ball this morning. You nailed it,

0:33:28.320 --> 0:33:30.120
<v Speaker 5>and I said we had to hold tight just to

0:33:30.160 --> 0:33:30.840
<v Speaker 5>make sure.

0:33:31.080 --> 0:33:34.080
<v Speaker 3>A US retail sales. As Molly wrote in the Bloomberg

0:33:34.160 --> 0:33:37.480
<v Speaker 3>story that you can read on top Go rising at

0:33:37.480 --> 0:33:40.080
<v Speaker 3>the strongest place in three months. In December, treasury yields

0:33:40.120 --> 0:33:44.000
<v Speaker 3>popped on the news. So how does this all gel

0:33:44.200 --> 0:33:46.960
<v Speaker 3>with the current investment climate? Let's put that to our

0:33:47.000 --> 0:33:51.760
<v Speaker 3>next guest, Geetu Sharma, founder and investment manager at Alpha's Future,

0:33:51.880 --> 0:33:55.400
<v Speaker 3>joining us from I'm going to guess the coldest place

0:33:55.440 --> 0:33:59.520
<v Speaker 3>on a planet Earth right now? Minneapolis? How bad is it.

0:34:01.360 --> 0:34:01.719
<v Speaker 9>Hi there?

0:34:01.840 --> 0:34:04.520
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, it's pretty cold here. I think with the wind

0:34:04.560 --> 0:34:06.280
<v Speaker 10>chills it's about minus twenty.

0:34:07.560 --> 0:34:08.720
<v Speaker 5>We're in Antarctica.

0:34:08.880 --> 0:34:11.799
<v Speaker 3>Molly's just back from Antarctica. She says, it's colder here

0:34:11.800 --> 0:34:13.040
<v Speaker 3>in New York than it.

0:34:13.080 --> 0:34:16.640
<v Speaker 5>Wasn't a serious Antarctica. It's summer right now. It's beautiful

0:34:16.680 --> 0:34:17.320
<v Speaker 5>down there.

0:34:17.320 --> 0:34:20.920
<v Speaker 3>All right, well, anyway, you know, every time I count

0:34:20.960 --> 0:34:24.759
<v Speaker 3>out the American consumer, I'm dead wrong. What do you

0:34:24.800 --> 0:34:27.840
<v Speaker 3>make of the data that we got today, and more importantly,

0:34:28.600 --> 0:34:31.680
<v Speaker 3>what does it imply for FED policy and just markets overall?

0:34:33.360 --> 0:34:36.240
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I think like you were talking earlier, the consumer

0:34:36.280 --> 0:34:41.520
<v Speaker 10>remains very strong and is consuming, is willing to spend,

0:34:41.840 --> 0:34:45.239
<v Speaker 10>and we're not seeing any kind of slow down in

0:34:45.360 --> 0:34:50.200
<v Speaker 10>demand right now. Besides the strong retail sales data, we

0:34:50.320 --> 0:34:56.360
<v Speaker 10>also read about positive humban the sentiment, the mortgage demand

0:34:56.400 --> 0:35:00.680
<v Speaker 10>going up as well. And last week we saw unemployment

0:35:00.760 --> 0:35:03.520
<v Speaker 10>rate at about three point seven percent, which is you know,

0:35:03.600 --> 0:35:07.719
<v Speaker 10>one of the lowest or fifty sixty years. So we're

0:35:07.760 --> 0:35:13.719
<v Speaker 10>really not seeing any kind of shop significant slowdown that

0:35:13.840 --> 0:35:16.719
<v Speaker 10>would imply that a recession is coming. In fact, we're

0:35:16.719 --> 0:35:19.840
<v Speaker 10>seeing a consumer and an economy that continues to be

0:35:19.920 --> 0:35:23.760
<v Speaker 10>very strong, very resilient in the pace of high interest rates,

0:35:24.920 --> 0:35:28.080
<v Speaker 10>and you know, and inflation has come down, so that

0:35:28.239 --> 0:35:31.320
<v Speaker 10>of course is giving a positive post to the consumer

0:35:31.400 --> 0:35:31.920
<v Speaker 10>as well.

0:35:32.360 --> 0:35:34.560
<v Speaker 5>Of course, and you know you had mentioned in your

0:35:35.080 --> 0:35:37.440
<v Speaker 5>notes just just before the show gets you that the

0:35:37.520 --> 0:35:41.680
<v Speaker 5>outlook for disinflation remains uncertain, and obviously we did see

0:35:41.719 --> 0:35:44.880
<v Speaker 5>that CPI report. I believe that was last week. The

0:35:44.920 --> 0:35:47.279
<v Speaker 5>time is fine, but it was, as you said, you know,

0:35:47.320 --> 0:35:50.359
<v Speaker 5>it's a bit bumpy. So how are you parsing through

0:35:50.400 --> 0:35:53.360
<v Speaker 5>these different reports? And I'm really, you know, sticking to

0:35:53.440 --> 0:35:57.279
<v Speaker 5>your guns that inflation is on a firm downward trajectory.

0:35:58.920 --> 0:36:00.839
<v Speaker 10>I think it's at this point point of time, it's

0:36:00.960 --> 0:36:06.040
<v Speaker 10>really hard to say how far inflation will go down further.

0:36:06.160 --> 0:36:10.000
<v Speaker 10>We've seen some really sharp declines in twenty twenty three

0:36:10.480 --> 0:36:14.000
<v Speaker 10>and that has brought inflation down from nine person from

0:36:14.040 --> 0:36:17.440
<v Speaker 10>a higher nine person in June twenty two to about

0:36:17.800 --> 0:36:22.000
<v Speaker 10>two to three person right now. But it's often said

0:36:22.040 --> 0:36:24.880
<v Speaker 10>that the last leg is the most difficult, and we

0:36:24.960 --> 0:36:29.439
<v Speaker 10>did see the recent CPI data slightly nudge up. And

0:36:29.920 --> 0:36:32.080
<v Speaker 10>one of the biggest challenges I think for the FED

0:36:32.200 --> 0:36:34.960
<v Speaker 10>is that we just continue to be very sticky and

0:36:35.280 --> 0:36:38.719
<v Speaker 10>that's trending around four person right now, and that can

0:36:38.800 --> 0:36:42.560
<v Speaker 10>keep inflation at the current levels of two to three person,

0:36:42.640 --> 0:36:45.839
<v Speaker 10>which is still about pet's target. And as long as

0:36:45.840 --> 0:36:49.000
<v Speaker 10>they're can be staying strong and the inflation is stable

0:36:49.120 --> 0:36:52.959
<v Speaker 10>at this higher number, I don't see how the FED

0:36:53.080 --> 0:36:56.120
<v Speaker 10>woul't want to cut so rapidly as the market is

0:36:56.160 --> 0:36:58.200
<v Speaker 10>expecting S and p FI.

0:36:58.239 --> 0:37:01.040
<v Speaker 3>I've found it, as you mentioned, it ain't cheap at

0:37:01.040 --> 0:37:05.640
<v Speaker 3>this point, but I look a little broader small mid caps.

0:37:06.239 --> 0:37:09.800
<v Speaker 3>Not only do they seem to be massively under owned

0:37:09.920 --> 0:37:13.720
<v Speaker 3>my investors at this point and by institutions, they're about

0:37:13.719 --> 0:37:19.359
<v Speaker 3>thirteen to fourteen times earnings. You can own these? Is

0:37:19.400 --> 0:37:20.480
<v Speaker 3>that an alternative?

0:37:22.320 --> 0:37:26.120
<v Speaker 10>I think it's a very difficult situation in terms up

0:37:26.640 --> 0:37:30.160
<v Speaker 10>investing right now, because what we've seen is a large

0:37:30.160 --> 0:37:33.520
<v Speaker 10>part of last year's value was driven by tech and

0:37:33.760 --> 0:37:38.600
<v Speaker 10>AI and secular trends around AI, and the rally was

0:37:38.640 --> 0:37:40.600
<v Speaker 10>not only in the large cap tech but also in

0:37:40.640 --> 0:37:44.600
<v Speaker 10>the small and MidCap tech. So there is this segment

0:37:44.640 --> 0:37:49.160
<v Speaker 10>of the market which has high growth, strong cash flows,

0:37:49.640 --> 0:37:54.879
<v Speaker 10>profitable and continues to do well and has expensive valuations.

0:37:55.360 --> 0:37:58.200
<v Speaker 10>On the other hand, you have everything else in the economy,

0:37:58.239 --> 0:38:02.719
<v Speaker 10>whether it's industrials or describtionary or even the defensive sectors

0:38:02.760 --> 0:38:06.879
<v Speaker 10>that have not participated in the rally, have underperformed last

0:38:06.960 --> 0:38:12.600
<v Speaker 10>year and are at especially the industrials and the financial

0:38:12.760 --> 0:38:16.359
<v Speaker 10>energy sectors. They remain exposed to recession risks, so they're

0:38:16.400 --> 0:38:19.879
<v Speaker 10>most cyclical and have downside risks. If we do head

0:38:19.880 --> 0:38:24.120
<v Speaker 10>into a recession. So the question is do you, uh,

0:38:24.360 --> 0:38:27.080
<v Speaker 10>do you continue to invest in tech which has this

0:38:27.480 --> 0:38:33.799
<v Speaker 10>positive profitability, demand growth trends but is expensive, or do

0:38:33.880 --> 0:38:36.799
<v Speaker 10>you how much of your portfolio do you weigh in

0:38:36.800 --> 0:38:40.520
<v Speaker 10>towards some of these value sectors which have not performed

0:38:40.560 --> 0:38:41.040
<v Speaker 10>so far?

0:38:41.440 --> 0:38:44.360
<v Speaker 3>Is there like, is there like a magnificent magnificent seven

0:38:44.520 --> 0:38:47.200
<v Speaker 3>in like small and mid caps?

0:38:48.480 --> 0:38:50.480
<v Speaker 10>I don't think so.

0:38:50.520 --> 0:38:55.640
<v Speaker 5>They're all magnificent across the board there, you two. So

0:38:55.800 --> 0:38:58.200
<v Speaker 5>if we're talking about the possibility of recession, I feel

0:38:58.200 --> 0:39:01.160
<v Speaker 5>like we've got to talk about these FED wagers here

0:39:01.200 --> 0:39:03.680
<v Speaker 5>and looking at investors that are pricing in as many

0:39:03.719 --> 0:39:07.799
<v Speaker 5>as six rate cuts next year. Obviously the FEDS dot

0:39:07.880 --> 0:39:11.720
<v Speaker 5>plot indicating just three. Where do you stand in that debate?

0:39:11.760 --> 0:39:14.640
<v Speaker 5>Because that's a that's a pretty big discrepancy between three

0:39:14.640 --> 0:39:17.440
<v Speaker 5>and six. And also why do you investors just not

0:39:17.560 --> 0:39:19.120
<v Speaker 5>believe the Fed time and time again?

0:39:20.960 --> 0:39:25.200
<v Speaker 10>So I think the market tends to swing from one

0:39:25.320 --> 0:39:28.120
<v Speaker 10>end to the other. We you know, and and a

0:39:28.120 --> 0:39:30.600
<v Speaker 10>lot of the market projections as well as the FED

0:39:30.719 --> 0:39:35.160
<v Speaker 10>projections have not come through for a while. We you know,

0:39:35.200 --> 0:39:39.439
<v Speaker 10>the market expected with session in twenty three that didn't

0:39:39.480 --> 0:39:42.760
<v Speaker 10>come through. We were expecting one more rate high towards

0:39:42.760 --> 0:39:44.799
<v Speaker 10>the end of the year that didn't come through. So

0:39:44.840 --> 0:39:49.680
<v Speaker 10>there's been you know, data has been shifting, and it's

0:39:49.800 --> 0:39:53.760
<v Speaker 10>really you know, hard to predict what's going to happen.

0:39:54.440 --> 0:39:58.040
<v Speaker 10>But clearly the difference between what the Fed is stop

0:39:58.280 --> 0:40:02.360
<v Speaker 10>is anticipating, which is a soft planning scenario stable growth

0:40:02.560 --> 0:40:07.040
<v Speaker 10>INFISH going to two by twenty twenty five. The Fed

0:40:07.200 --> 0:40:11.560
<v Speaker 10>is looking at normalizing interest rates to about four four

0:40:11.600 --> 0:40:14.520
<v Speaker 10>and a half person this year, whereas the market is

0:40:14.600 --> 0:40:18.680
<v Speaker 10>forecasting a more dire situation that ultimately leads to a

0:40:18.680 --> 0:40:21.640
<v Speaker 10>recession and the BED has to cut a lot more.

0:40:22.320 --> 0:40:25.960
<v Speaker 10>I think it remains this remains a big debate in

0:40:26.000 --> 0:40:28.360
<v Speaker 10>the market right now, and every day we are seeing

0:40:28.440 --> 0:40:33.000
<v Speaker 10>moves that are reflecting, you know, a ship from one

0:40:33.040 --> 0:40:36.560
<v Speaker 10>side of this debate to the other. Not really direction.

0:40:36.960 --> 0:40:39.040
<v Speaker 3>We're going to have to leave it there at Gitu Sharma,

0:40:39.080 --> 0:40:43.000
<v Speaker 3>the founder investment manager at Alpha's Future, thanks for being

0:40:43.000 --> 0:40:45.960
<v Speaker 3>with us date, I really appreciate it. From what'd you

0:40:46.000 --> 0:40:50.640
<v Speaker 3>say twenty below Windshield Minneapolis will not be signing me

0:40:50.719 --> 0:40:51.160
<v Speaker 3>up for that.

0:40:51.840 --> 0:40:54.960
<v Speaker 6>You're listening to the tape. Cat's are live program Bloomberg

0:40:55.040 --> 0:40:58.919
<v Speaker 6>Markets weekdays at ten am Eastern on Bloomberg Radio, tune

0:40:58.960 --> 0:41:00.440
<v Speaker 6>in app, Bloomberg Dot.

0:41:00.480 --> 0:41:01.919
<v Speaker 7>And the Bloomberg Business App.

0:41:01.960 --> 0:41:04.759
<v Speaker 6>You can also listen live on Amazon Alexa from our

0:41:04.760 --> 0:41:09.200
<v Speaker 6>flagship New York station, Just say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty.

0:41:11.040 --> 0:41:15.120
<v Speaker 3>Investor's question the timing of FED rate cuts, among other things.

0:41:15.200 --> 0:41:17.600
<v Speaker 3>And with that context, let's bring in our next guest,

0:41:17.640 --> 0:41:23.960
<v Speaker 3>Molly Ron Sanchez, the chief investment officer at Fiduciary Trust International. Hi,

0:41:24.080 --> 0:41:25.040
<v Speaker 3>thanks for stupping.

0:41:24.719 --> 0:41:26.680
<v Speaker 11>By, great, Thank you, thanks for having me.

0:41:26.760 --> 0:41:28.000
<v Speaker 3>So what's in the driver's seat?

0:41:29.400 --> 0:41:32.279
<v Speaker 11>Well, from a market standpoint, I think markets are sort

0:41:32.320 --> 0:41:34.160
<v Speaker 11>of languishing a little bit here because there isn't a

0:41:34.200 --> 0:41:37.960
<v Speaker 11>catalyst we had. As you well know, markets ended the

0:41:38.040 --> 0:41:40.920
<v Speaker 11>year on a strong note. We already have seen the

0:41:40.960 --> 0:41:44.640
<v Speaker 11>most too important economic data for January that was the

0:41:44.719 --> 0:41:46.560
<v Speaker 11>labor report and CPI.

0:41:47.080 --> 0:41:48.160
<v Speaker 7>So at this.

0:41:48.239 --> 0:41:51.640
<v Speaker 11>Point I think the focus turns to earnings. We've seen

0:41:51.640 --> 0:41:54.480
<v Speaker 11>a couple of bank earnings, but we will see earnings

0:41:54.560 --> 0:41:57.520
<v Speaker 11>over the next two to three weeks. That'll give us

0:41:57.520 --> 0:42:00.319
<v Speaker 11>an idea about how the macro is filtering into the

0:42:00.360 --> 0:42:04.959
<v Speaker 11>micro and perhaps more importantly, CEO's expectations for twenty four.

0:42:05.080 --> 0:42:06.879
<v Speaker 5>Give us a little some of what we saw from

0:42:06.920 --> 0:42:09.759
<v Speaker 5>the bank earnings and what your biggest takeaway was from that.

0:42:10.600 --> 0:42:16.000
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, so almost that is quote as we expected, nothing alarming,

0:42:16.840 --> 0:42:21.680
<v Speaker 11>and economic activity and the banking system remain in good shape.

0:42:22.200 --> 0:42:25.400
<v Speaker 11>And I'm not sure that sort of bank earnings signal

0:42:25.840 --> 0:42:28.040
<v Speaker 11>much on the on the macro, we have to wait

0:42:28.080 --> 0:42:29.120
<v Speaker 11>for other companies.

0:42:29.440 --> 0:42:31.840
<v Speaker 3>For sure. We're maybe the last mile is going to

0:42:31.840 --> 0:42:34.120
<v Speaker 3>be real difficult to get to the Fed's target of

0:42:34.160 --> 0:42:37.719
<v Speaker 3>two percent. But we are in a disinflationary or in

0:42:37.760 --> 0:42:44.520
<v Speaker 3>some sectors outright deflationary environment. What does that do to earnings.

0:42:44.880 --> 0:42:47.480
<v Speaker 11>Well, it creates two things. I think it's going to

0:42:47.480 --> 0:42:52.760
<v Speaker 11>be much more challenging to pass on, and so revenue

0:42:52.760 --> 0:42:56.960
<v Speaker 11>and profit margins are going to be needed.

0:42:56.719 --> 0:42:59.560
<v Speaker 3>To sort of oporates for it.

0:42:59.560 --> 0:43:03.600
<v Speaker 11>Doesn't it does. Indeed, I think there's after two years

0:43:03.680 --> 0:43:07.080
<v Speaker 11>of where not only did you pass on rising input cost,

0:43:07.600 --> 0:43:10.640
<v Speaker 11>but a little more, and I think that environment is

0:43:10.719 --> 0:43:14.360
<v Speaker 11>clearly behind us. I think it's much more challenging and

0:43:14.400 --> 0:43:18.160
<v Speaker 11>if you do raise prices, you could see it manifest

0:43:18.239 --> 0:43:21.280
<v Speaker 11>itself in lower volume. So there's that trade off between

0:43:21.320 --> 0:43:23.000
<v Speaker 11>sales volume and sales revenue.

0:43:23.080 --> 0:43:25.439
<v Speaker 5>But prices are still going up. No, I mean, yes,

0:43:25.640 --> 0:43:28.160
<v Speaker 5>at a slower rate, but I mean there still is

0:43:28.200 --> 0:43:29.880
<v Speaker 5>some pricing power there, maybe.

0:43:29.640 --> 0:43:32.839
<v Speaker 11>Just not as much there is, And I think as

0:43:32.880 --> 0:43:34.919
<v Speaker 11>we move on it'll be it'll be less and less

0:43:34.960 --> 0:43:37.239
<v Speaker 11>and so at least as we sit here today, the

0:43:37.239 --> 0:43:41.359
<v Speaker 11>moderation I think is evident and well, especially sort of

0:43:41.600 --> 0:43:43.640
<v Speaker 11>in the goods market, it definitely.

0:43:43.280 --> 0:43:45.240
<v Speaker 3>Is Okay, So what do you like at this point?

0:43:45.719 --> 0:43:49.279
<v Speaker 11>So I think the market looks, broadly speaking, looks you know,

0:43:49.800 --> 0:43:52.600
<v Speaker 11>compelling to us. I do think the first half of

0:43:52.600 --> 0:43:54.520
<v Speaker 11>the year is going to be choppy for risk assets

0:43:54.560 --> 0:43:54.799
<v Speaker 11>i e.

0:43:55.239 --> 0:43:55.839
<v Speaker 6>Equities.

0:43:56.239 --> 0:43:59.400
<v Speaker 11>I think we pulled forward a fair amount of return

0:44:00.040 --> 0:44:04.200
<v Speaker 11>to the fourth quarter, the soft landing that became evident

0:44:04.239 --> 0:44:07.120
<v Speaker 11>by year end. Again, twenty three was about the hard landing,

0:44:07.480 --> 0:44:10.879
<v Speaker 11>the no landing, but ultimately we've landed on the soft

0:44:10.960 --> 0:44:15.440
<v Speaker 11>landing and I think that's the high consensus or conviction trade.

0:44:15.760 --> 0:44:17.480
<v Speaker 11>And so the first half of the year I think

0:44:17.480 --> 0:44:21.160
<v Speaker 11>for risk assets is about a choppy market as you

0:44:21.200 --> 0:44:24.720
<v Speaker 11>look to validate that meaning, I need to see economic

0:44:24.840 --> 0:44:28.319
<v Speaker 11>data decelerate, not too much come in to around a

0:44:28.360 --> 0:44:31.239
<v Speaker 11>trend or slightly inside of two percent, and I need

0:44:31.280 --> 0:44:34.680
<v Speaker 11>to continue to see labor markets soften and the same

0:44:34.680 --> 0:44:37.839
<v Speaker 11>for inflation. In that environment, I think it sets up

0:44:37.840 --> 0:44:40.000
<v Speaker 11>better for the second half. And that's one of the

0:44:40.000 --> 0:44:42.520
<v Speaker 11>reasons why fixed incomes attractive for us, because I get

0:44:42.520 --> 0:44:43.120
<v Speaker 11>paid to eight.

0:44:43.920 --> 0:44:46.120
<v Speaker 5>Probably more attractive on a day like today as well.

0:44:46.200 --> 0:44:49.080
<v Speaker 5>When you see what was the two years up to say,

0:44:49.120 --> 0:44:51.960
<v Speaker 5>thirteen BIPs before John, you have four.

0:44:51.800 --> 0:44:54.200
<v Speaker 3>To thirty five of the yield right now thirteen basis

0:44:54.200 --> 0:44:57.759
<v Speaker 3>points enter the ten op six four to twelve. We

0:44:57.880 --> 0:45:03.920
<v Speaker 3>both Mully and I both missed five percent. Speak oh okay, sorry,

0:45:04.760 --> 0:45:08.399
<v Speaker 3>that's why she's going to Antarctica in Mexico. But we

0:45:08.440 --> 0:45:12.160
<v Speaker 3>missed the boat. I missed the boat on five four twelve.

0:45:12.280 --> 0:45:13.359
<v Speaker 3>Still a screaming buy.

0:45:14.040 --> 0:45:16.360
<v Speaker 11>I don't know about a screaming by, but it's it's attractive.

0:45:16.719 --> 0:45:20.880
<v Speaker 11>Two fronts want to carry trade and so looking at

0:45:20.920 --> 0:45:23.279
<v Speaker 11>sort of risk free return four to four and a

0:45:23.360 --> 0:45:26.799
<v Speaker 11>quarter is appealing, and it gives you a hedge in

0:45:26.880 --> 0:45:32.160
<v Speaker 11>case the economy does decelerate faster than we think. It'll

0:45:32.160 --> 0:45:35.040
<v Speaker 11>be a hedge against risk assets that'll that'll come under

0:45:35.040 --> 0:45:37.680
<v Speaker 11>some pressure. And I think you could see if we

0:45:37.719 --> 0:45:40.600
<v Speaker 11>do have an economic recession. Again, that's not our view.

0:45:41.280 --> 0:45:44.000
<v Speaker 11>Interstrates will will come down inside of four and you'll

0:45:44.000 --> 0:45:45.000
<v Speaker 11>have a total raid return.

0:45:45.080 --> 0:45:48.879
<v Speaker 3>That again is reasonable application. You're sixty forty.

0:45:49.080 --> 0:45:53.480
<v Speaker 11>That's right, and so we are neutral on US equity,

0:45:53.640 --> 0:45:57.600
<v Speaker 11>slight underweight in Europe and a slide overweight and fixed income.

0:45:57.840 --> 0:46:00.520
<v Speaker 5>So you're saying we're looking for a catalyst right now,

0:46:01.040 --> 0:46:03.520
<v Speaker 5>earnings being one of them. But I guess on the

0:46:03.640 --> 0:46:05.520
<v Speaker 5>ECO calendar, you know, we do have a FED meeting

0:46:05.840 --> 0:46:08.560
<v Speaker 5>in two weeks. I guess maybe not expecting to be

0:46:08.600 --> 0:46:12.319
<v Speaker 5>particularly exciting from a policy standpoint, but any early thoughts

0:46:12.360 --> 0:46:15.160
<v Speaker 5>ahead of that, and what new clues we might be

0:46:15.239 --> 0:46:18.759
<v Speaker 5>hearing from the FED, and just maybe the timing of

0:46:18.840 --> 0:46:19.560
<v Speaker 5>cuts this year.

0:46:19.920 --> 0:46:23.000
<v Speaker 11>Sure, I don't think we're going to sort of hear much.

0:46:24.360 --> 0:46:27.520
<v Speaker 11>They are coalescing around the hold. I don't think they

0:46:27.600 --> 0:46:31.359
<v Speaker 11>want to pre sell a cut, and I think they

0:46:31.400 --> 0:46:33.840
<v Speaker 11>want to have some patients here. I know the market

0:46:33.840 --> 0:46:37.080
<v Speaker 11>things differently. It's building in a first cut in March,

0:46:38.000 --> 0:46:41.440
<v Speaker 11>and for us it's just too premature. March is not

0:46:41.480 --> 0:46:44.000
<v Speaker 11>a line in the sand. I think the way investors

0:46:44.000 --> 0:46:46.839
<v Speaker 11>need to be looking at this is that I am

0:46:46.920 --> 0:46:49.640
<v Speaker 11>going to see the Federal Reserve move from a fighting

0:46:49.920 --> 0:46:54.920
<v Speaker 11>inflation campaign in twenty three to managing the economic cycle

0:46:55.040 --> 0:46:59.120
<v Speaker 11>in twenty four. And if the economy moderates as we expect,

0:46:59.480 --> 0:47:04.279
<v Speaker 11>they'll be latitude and scope to lower rates. Five and

0:47:04.320 --> 0:47:06.600
<v Speaker 11>a half's not the right number, so I think it's

0:47:06.640 --> 0:47:09.680
<v Speaker 11>more of a second half development. And again under the

0:47:09.760 --> 0:47:11.399
<v Speaker 11>heading of watch what you wish for? If they were

0:47:11.400 --> 0:47:14.319
<v Speaker 11>to move in March, given the fact there's only two

0:47:14.360 --> 0:47:17.200
<v Speaker 11>more labor reports, you would need to see more of

0:47:17.239 --> 0:47:21.000
<v Speaker 11>a rollover of economic data for them to move, and

0:47:21.560 --> 0:47:25.000
<v Speaker 11>I prefer to see the economy moderate than rollover.

0:47:25.200 --> 0:47:26.440
<v Speaker 5>I think we all would prefer that.

0:47:26.640 --> 0:47:30.520
<v Speaker 3>Yes, let's throw politics into the mix. I'm hearing the

0:47:30.560 --> 0:47:34.000
<v Speaker 3>word tariff pop up again again by a certain candidate.

0:47:34.080 --> 0:47:37.520
<v Speaker 3>What sort of risk does that bring it into the

0:47:38.239 --> 0:47:39.040
<v Speaker 3>equity space?

0:47:39.160 --> 0:47:41.600
<v Speaker 11>Well, it just adds to a fair amount of uncertainty

0:47:41.600 --> 0:47:45.440
<v Speaker 11>from a geopolitical and here in the US as well.

0:47:45.560 --> 0:47:49.200
<v Speaker 11>Obviously we're early, it's an election year. I think in

0:47:49.280 --> 0:47:51.879
<v Speaker 11>the first half of the year though, it will be

0:47:51.920 --> 0:47:55.160
<v Speaker 11>more about the economy and about the FED and inflation.

0:47:55.840 --> 0:47:57.560
<v Speaker 11>In the second half a year, I think you could

0:47:57.560 --> 0:48:00.200
<v Speaker 11>see market volatility attributed to political develop.

0:48:00.400 --> 0:48:04.160
<v Speaker 3>And the conventional wisdom is that FED policy makers aren't

0:48:04.200 --> 0:48:08.720
<v Speaker 3>going to act close to an election. Do you believe

0:48:08.719 --> 0:48:11.280
<v Speaker 3>that and how does that sort of change the timing

0:48:11.520 --> 0:48:14.360
<v Speaker 3>of the expectation of rate cuts.

0:48:14.560 --> 0:48:17.319
<v Speaker 11>Yeah, I do not believe that. I think they're in

0:48:17.360 --> 0:48:20.799
<v Speaker 11>an environment where they have been very aggressive needed to

0:48:20.840 --> 0:48:23.880
<v Speaker 11>be to fight inflation. I think their job is complete

0:48:24.280 --> 0:48:27.840
<v Speaker 11>on that front, and they are in a restrictive posture,

0:48:28.239 --> 0:48:30.919
<v Speaker 11>and as we move closer to election, there's a lot

0:48:30.920 --> 0:48:33.600
<v Speaker 11>of economic data to see where we end up and

0:48:33.640 --> 0:48:36.360
<v Speaker 11>whether it truly is a soft landing and where inflation

0:48:36.640 --> 0:48:38.839
<v Speaker 11>ends up, and I think in that regard, the FED

0:48:38.840 --> 0:48:43.000
<v Speaker 11>would like to moderate its stance and move from restrictive

0:48:43.040 --> 0:48:43.560
<v Speaker 11>to neutral.

0:48:43.920 --> 0:48:47.080
<v Speaker 5>I think they're also, you know, pretty decisively and you know,

0:48:47.600 --> 0:48:50.239
<v Speaker 5>a pivot right now toward lower interest rates. So I

0:48:50.239 --> 0:48:53.560
<v Speaker 5>don't think that it would really be as controversial if

0:48:53.560 --> 0:48:56.560
<v Speaker 5>they were to, you know, cut interest rates sometime around

0:48:56.560 --> 0:48:59.719
<v Speaker 5>the election. If that's obviously so pre calibrated at this.

0:48:59.680 --> 0:49:02.280
<v Speaker 11>Point, I'd agree with that, all right, they can't afford

0:49:02.280 --> 0:49:03.520
<v Speaker 11>to pass They kind of put.

0:49:03.440 --> 0:49:07.120
<v Speaker 3>You on the spot with my unfair questions, But how

0:49:07.120 --> 0:49:09.160
<v Speaker 3>many cuts this year from the Fed.

0:49:09.200 --> 0:49:13.640
<v Speaker 11>Did you say the Fed thinks three, the market thinks six,

0:49:13.960 --> 0:49:16.560
<v Speaker 11>and I think it's between three and six. It's at

0:49:16.640 --> 0:49:18.320
<v Speaker 11>least three, all right, And I'd say.

0:49:18.120 --> 0:49:24.799
<v Speaker 3>Four S and P five year in target.

0:49:24.160 --> 0:49:26.360
<v Speaker 11>So a modest return of five to seven percent for

0:49:26.400 --> 0:49:27.200
<v Speaker 11>the S and P five.

0:49:27.080 --> 0:49:30.719
<v Speaker 3>Hundred, all right, So five, that's okay, all right.

0:49:31.200 --> 0:49:33.600
<v Speaker 5>That sounds like a good number also for that round.

0:49:33.680 --> 0:49:38.400
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, okay, thanks, good to see it. Ron Bron Sanchez,

0:49:38.400 --> 0:49:43.040
<v Speaker 3>the chief investment Officer at Fiduciary Trust International, coming in

0:49:43.080 --> 0:49:45.600
<v Speaker 3>from the Islands, Long Island.

0:49:45.320 --> 0:49:47.239
<v Speaker 5>Best to the Island of Manhattan.

0:49:47.640 --> 0:49:50.719
<v Speaker 2>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg Markets podcast. You can

0:49:50.760 --> 0:49:54.560
<v Speaker 2>subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts or whatever

0:49:54.640 --> 0:49:58.360
<v Speaker 2>podcast platform you prefer. I'm Matt Miller. I'm on Twitter

0:49:58.560 --> 0:50:00.640
<v Speaker 2>at Matt Miller nineteen seven twenty three.

0:50:00.920 --> 0:50:03.320
<v Speaker 11>And I'm Paul Sweeney. I'm on Twitter at pt Sweeney.

0:50:03.440 --> 0:50:06.080
<v Speaker 11>Before the podcast, you can always catch us worldwide at

0:50:06.120 --> 0:50:06.839
<v Speaker 11>Bloomberg Radio.