WEBVTT - AFC South overview for 2021. Even Houston.

0:00:00.640 --> 0:00:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to Fantasy Football Weekly, a production of I Heart Radio.

0:00:06.440 --> 0:00:09.840
<v Speaker 1>Time now for Fantasy Football Weekly from I Heart Radio,

0:00:10.080 --> 0:00:14.480
<v Speaker 1>your weekly source for the nation's best fantasy football advice, speculation,

0:00:14.640 --> 0:00:18.240
<v Speaker 1>and whatever stupid stuff they decided to drop into the show. Now,

0:00:18.280 --> 0:00:24.240
<v Speaker 1>here's your host, Paul. Welcome to another edition of Fantasy

0:00:24.360 --> 0:00:27.120
<v Speaker 1>Football Weekly. I'm Paul Charchy and my co host is

0:00:27.160 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 1>Brian Johnson. It is I how it be you? Uh,

0:00:32.400 --> 0:00:35.640
<v Speaker 1>it's going great, Thank you very much. It's another opportunity

0:00:35.640 --> 0:00:38.760
<v Speaker 1>to go through the various divisions of the NFL and

0:00:39.200 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 1>really project what we expect to happen this year. We're

0:00:43.360 --> 0:00:46.360
<v Speaker 1>not replaying last year. You already know what happened last year.

0:00:46.360 --> 0:00:48.000
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna tell you what we think is going to

0:00:48.080 --> 0:00:51.839
<v Speaker 1>happen this season, what's different, and specifically, at the end

0:00:51.880 --> 0:00:55.760
<v Speaker 1>of each each team by team breakdown, we will talk

0:00:55.800 --> 0:01:00.840
<v Speaker 1>about the riskiest player at his current eight P and

0:01:00.920 --> 0:01:05.120
<v Speaker 1>the player with the most upside compared to ADP. So

0:01:05.160 --> 0:01:09.480
<v Speaker 1>that's coming up. Let's do it. Yeah, but first, hey,

0:01:09.520 --> 0:01:11.200
<v Speaker 1>you might want to play in a Guilloteam League. We

0:01:11.200 --> 0:01:13.800
<v Speaker 1>think it's a fantastic format. Eighteen teams start the season.

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:16.160
<v Speaker 1>No had to head every week, the lowest scoring team

0:01:16.160 --> 0:01:19.320
<v Speaker 1>goes to the waiver wire, and that team's entire roster

0:01:19.560 --> 0:01:24.760
<v Speaker 1>goes to free agency, where pandemonium ensues. It's a Week

0:01:24.800 --> 0:01:27.720
<v Speaker 1>one and a whole roster of players hits the waiver wire.

0:01:27.760 --> 0:01:30.840
<v Speaker 1>Do you spend a bunch of money on Aaron Jones

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:33.440
<v Speaker 1>has a bad Week one? For example? Do you spend

0:01:33.480 --> 0:01:35.240
<v Speaker 1>a bunch of money on Aaron Jones knowing you could

0:01:35.280 --> 0:01:36.840
<v Speaker 1>start him the rest of the year, or do you

0:01:36.840 --> 0:01:39.600
<v Speaker 1>wait and hope you don't get chopped and save that

0:01:39.640 --> 0:01:42.039
<v Speaker 1>money for later. On a scale from one to ten,

0:01:42.800 --> 0:01:45.520
<v Speaker 1>let's put it this way, how much weight do you

0:01:45.520 --> 0:01:49.360
<v Speaker 1>put into the Week one matchup in your early round picks,

0:01:50.400 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 1>primarily first, second, third round me, I'm like a seven

0:01:54.200 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 1>out of ten put right on that um. On the

0:01:57.760 --> 0:02:02.640
<v Speaker 1>premium Guillot League cheat sheet that we offer on the site,

0:02:02.680 --> 0:02:08.200
<v Speaker 1>we show you the the Vegas implied total points for

0:02:08.240 --> 0:02:10.960
<v Speaker 1>each team through the first three weeks of the season.

0:02:11.600 --> 0:02:13.760
<v Speaker 1>So if you want to make sure that your players

0:02:13.760 --> 0:02:16.040
<v Speaker 1>do well, uh, we encourage you to check that out.

0:02:16.080 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 1>I believe I will have that posted. I'm almost got

0:02:19.200 --> 0:02:21.120
<v Speaker 1>that sheet ready. It's so filled with data. It just

0:02:21.160 --> 0:02:24.080
<v Speaker 1>takes time and and tip of the hat to our

0:02:24.320 --> 0:02:26.800
<v Speaker 1>our our super intern Tyler, who has done a very

0:02:26.840 --> 0:02:30.920
<v Speaker 1>good job helping me fill data on this. Um. Yeah,

0:02:31.000 --> 0:02:34.480
<v Speaker 1>so that's coming early next week, I believe, sweet guillote

0:02:34.600 --> 0:02:36.320
<v Speaker 1>leagues dot com. And also check out super Chop, our

0:02:36.360 --> 0:02:39.000
<v Speaker 1>new high stakes format for guillotine leagues as well super

0:02:39.120 --> 0:02:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Chop yet guillote leagues dot com. Let's start with Houston, Brian,

0:02:44.720 --> 0:02:46.920
<v Speaker 1>if we must. Yeah, let's just get out of the way.

0:02:47.000 --> 0:02:50.400
<v Speaker 1>That was my thinking of us. You know, there's not

0:02:50.480 --> 0:02:52.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot of fantasy relevance on this team that could

0:02:52.560 --> 0:02:56.360
<v Speaker 1>easily have the worst record in the NFL. And you know,

0:02:56.440 --> 0:03:00.079
<v Speaker 1>we're all operating under the assumption that the way to

0:03:00.280 --> 0:03:06.160
<v Speaker 1>twenty two class action lawsuits against uh um Deshaun Watson

0:03:06.240 --> 0:03:10.160
<v Speaker 1>is going to be enough to torpedo his season. That's

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:14.079
<v Speaker 1>the way it seems. But he's I'm not gonna say

0:03:14.120 --> 0:03:16.680
<v Speaker 1>out of the woods. He's not in the either way

0:03:16.720 --> 0:03:21.239
<v Speaker 1>he might play this year. He might right now. There's

0:03:21.240 --> 0:03:24.240
<v Speaker 1>no criminal charges against him. Now the NFL doesn't have

0:03:24.320 --> 0:03:27.239
<v Speaker 1>to care about that, but I certainly think that that

0:03:27.240 --> 0:03:29.560
<v Speaker 1>that works in his favor. Yeah, well, we'll get to

0:03:29.639 --> 0:03:32.240
<v Speaker 1>Deshaun Watson and then the passing game with or without him.

0:03:32.320 --> 0:03:34.320
<v Speaker 1>In a second, just real quick. The Texans do have

0:03:34.360 --> 0:03:37.280
<v Speaker 1>a new head coach and David Culley. He was the

0:03:37.360 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>passing coordinator from the Baltimore Ravens. We had another passing

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:43.400
<v Speaker 1>coordinator head coach who were new head coach or at

0:03:43.440 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 1>least new o see who we talked about last week.

0:03:46.080 --> 0:03:47.840
<v Speaker 1>I think he was on. It doesn't matter. I've seen

0:03:47.840 --> 0:03:51.280
<v Speaker 1>a lot of passing coordinators getting promoted. Passing out a

0:03:51.320 --> 0:03:53.240
<v Speaker 1>passing coordinator was a thing, and it's thought that would

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:55.720
<v Speaker 1>fall into the offensive coordinator. But uh, new head coach

0:03:56.000 --> 0:03:59.760
<v Speaker 1>in David Culley. Last year, the Texans were very pass heavy.

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:02.560
<v Speaker 1>They passed the ball more than of the time at

0:04:02.600 --> 0:04:05.720
<v Speaker 1>the third highest clip in the league, meaning they ran

0:04:05.760 --> 0:04:08.640
<v Speaker 1>the ball up the third fewest amount of times. They

0:04:08.640 --> 0:04:12.000
<v Speaker 1>were thirty in the league. So pass heavy offense probably

0:04:12.000 --> 0:04:14.880
<v Speaker 1>gonna lean that way this year. But who's gonna be

0:04:14.920 --> 0:04:20.039
<v Speaker 1>a quarterback? Probably not DeShawn Watson, probably not, but could be.

0:04:20.440 --> 0:04:23.760
<v Speaker 1>Then there's Tarrod Taylor. Yep, of course, that's my guess,

0:04:23.800 --> 0:04:26.160
<v Speaker 1>is your week one starter. He'll be the Week one starter.

0:04:26.240 --> 0:04:28.560
<v Speaker 1>But they like Davis Mills, and we like Davis Mills.

0:04:28.560 --> 0:04:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Here rookie rookie at a Stanford a third round pick um,

0:04:31.960 --> 0:04:35.039
<v Speaker 1>but with just the eleven college starts, the presumption was

0:04:35.080 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>that Mills would spend his first year on the bench.

0:04:37.920 --> 0:04:40.480
<v Speaker 1>I like him, I like his prospects long term. But

0:04:40.520 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 1>I think the best thing for Davis Mills, assuming unless

0:04:44.080 --> 0:04:45.760
<v Speaker 1>it turns out he's even better than I think he

0:04:45.800 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 1>can be UH, is for him to spend as much

0:04:48.000 --> 0:04:49.560
<v Speaker 1>time as possible on the bench. I don't I don't

0:04:49.560 --> 0:04:52.400
<v Speaker 1>want to see him until November. Maybe, well, Tarad deserves

0:04:52.440 --> 0:04:56.159
<v Speaker 1>this week one started if Watson is disciplined, suspended or whatever.

0:04:56.240 --> 0:04:58.200
<v Speaker 1>So we'll go into the assumption to Rod is the

0:04:58.279 --> 0:05:03.320
<v Speaker 1>quarterback um. Looking at the wide receivers, Brandon Cooks is

0:05:03.360 --> 0:05:05.919
<v Speaker 1>the only wide receiver I want any part of on

0:05:06.000 --> 0:05:08.159
<v Speaker 1>this team. The other ones you're looking at our rookie

0:05:08.240 --> 0:05:11.039
<v Speaker 1>Nico Collins. Then he got Randall Cobb and Kick Qt

0:05:11.560 --> 0:05:15.880
<v Speaker 1>sharing slot duties. Not interested there, but Cooks I don't

0:05:15.920 --> 0:05:18.200
<v Speaker 1>mind him at wide receiver thirty eight right now, that's

0:05:18.360 --> 0:05:20.600
<v Speaker 1>that's a pretty good price for Cooks. And they're gonna

0:05:20.880 --> 0:05:23.960
<v Speaker 1>behind a lot. They're gonna throw a ton of Cooks.

0:05:23.960 --> 0:05:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Didn't scored a ton of touchdowns last year. I believe

0:05:26.000 --> 0:05:27.400
<v Speaker 1>he had at least five or six. But he was

0:05:27.440 --> 0:05:30.560
<v Speaker 1>top twenty in catches, top ten in yards among wide receivers,

0:05:30.560 --> 0:05:34.040
<v Speaker 1>So no reason he can't repeat those numbers and a quarterback.

0:05:34.360 --> 0:05:37.520
<v Speaker 1>The quarterback significant or injury, of course, but I think

0:05:37.520 --> 0:05:40.359
<v Speaker 1>he'll see the volume to certainly be a viable wide

0:05:40.360 --> 0:05:43.720
<v Speaker 1>receiver at three with potential wide receiver too upside. He's

0:05:43.720 --> 0:05:47.800
<v Speaker 1>still a very good player, just on a very bad team.

0:05:47.839 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 1>And now to the running backs, real quick, I mean,

0:05:50.560 --> 0:05:53.440
<v Speaker 1>do we even want to it's a mess. Houston is

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:58.839
<v Speaker 1>hoarding fading stars. David Johnson, Philip Lindsay marketing room. And

0:05:58.839 --> 0:06:00.680
<v Speaker 1>if that wasn't enough, and they went on signed Rex

0:06:00.760 --> 0:06:05.080
<v Speaker 1>Birkhead a few weeks ago, a major head scratcher, major

0:06:05.160 --> 0:06:09.080
<v Speaker 1>bald head scratcher. Um The line is decent in Houston.

0:06:09.120 --> 0:06:13.320
<v Speaker 1>There ranked by Pro Football Focus uh ranks twenty going

0:06:13.360 --> 0:06:15.880
<v Speaker 1>into this season. Laramy Counsel a big name left tackle.

0:06:15.960 --> 0:06:18.640
<v Speaker 1>He's a far better pass protector than run blocker. Though

0:06:19.520 --> 0:06:21.599
<v Speaker 1>you basically don't want to touch this backfield with a

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:23.760
<v Speaker 1>ten foot at all, not at all, And for that reason,

0:06:24.240 --> 0:06:27.159
<v Speaker 1>I think over the course of the season there will

0:06:27.200 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 1>be eight to ten rushing touchdowns to be had, and

0:06:34.440 --> 0:06:36.280
<v Speaker 1>you know the problem is you're gonna be divvying up

0:06:36.400 --> 0:06:40.120
<v Speaker 1>let's call it nine rushing touchdowns three different ways, and

0:06:40.160 --> 0:06:43.440
<v Speaker 1>then they're each good for like three touchdowns. You're good

0:06:43.480 --> 0:06:46.400
<v Speaker 1>luck guessing in any given game if this is a

0:06:46.560 --> 0:06:50.480
<v Speaker 1>David Johnson touchdown game or a Philip Lindsay or a

0:06:50.560 --> 0:06:52.680
<v Speaker 1>mark Ingram And I just don't think you're gonna know.

0:06:52.960 --> 0:06:54.599
<v Speaker 1>You're not gonna know most of the most of the

0:06:54.600 --> 0:06:56.719
<v Speaker 1>time what's coming, not at all. And for that reason,

0:06:56.800 --> 0:06:59.800
<v Speaker 1>David Johnson my riskiest player based on a DPS, not

0:07:00.080 --> 0:07:03.479
<v Speaker 1>expensive by any means. He's RB thirty seven right now,

0:07:03.520 --> 0:07:06.120
<v Speaker 1>And if I had to have, if I had to

0:07:06.160 --> 0:07:08.720
<v Speaker 1>have a Houston running back on my roster, it would

0:07:08.720 --> 0:07:10.680
<v Speaker 1>be David Johnson. But the beauty is you don't have

0:07:10.720 --> 0:07:13.200
<v Speaker 1>to have. You gonna make you by your roster and

0:07:13.280 --> 0:07:15.960
<v Speaker 1>looking at RB thirty seven right now and guys going

0:07:16.000 --> 0:07:18.520
<v Speaker 1>after him. So I'm on the clock and I'm contemplating

0:07:18.560 --> 0:07:22.880
<v Speaker 1>David Johnson, I'm taking I'll put him in order. My

0:07:22.920 --> 0:07:26.840
<v Speaker 1>preference is Zack Moss, Tony Pollard, Gus Edwards, Kenyan, Drake

0:07:26.880 --> 0:07:29.680
<v Speaker 1>All going after David Johnson all day, every day. So

0:07:29.760 --> 0:07:33.480
<v Speaker 1>David Johnson biggest risk with very minimal upside. Uh, with

0:07:33.520 --> 0:07:39.400
<v Speaker 1>that crowded running back room and upside try to find

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 1>right now? This is not easy. It's DeShawn Watson. You

0:07:42.440 --> 0:07:46.640
<v Speaker 1>get him at quarterback nineteen right now. Honestly nine team

0:07:46.720 --> 0:07:51.680
<v Speaker 1>feels high quarterback. You're very deep, but it is at nineteen.

0:07:51.720 --> 0:07:54.080
<v Speaker 1>I can still get a good starting quarterback. But if

0:07:54.080 --> 0:07:56.280
<v Speaker 1>I told you right now, you give you Carson Wentz

0:07:56.400 --> 0:08:00.640
<v Speaker 1>or Deshaun Watson Wentz and I I'm not gonna fault

0:08:00.640 --> 0:08:04.240
<v Speaker 1>anyone who doesn't want the toxic toxicity of Deshaun Watson

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:06.560
<v Speaker 1>on their fantasy team. I'm not gonna even more just

0:08:06.680 --> 0:08:11.760
<v Speaker 1>moral ground aside. Even if Watson, say starts the season, man,

0:08:11.840 --> 0:08:13.760
<v Speaker 1>I'd be on pins and needles every week, like is

0:08:13.880 --> 0:08:16.760
<v Speaker 1>this the week the NFL suspends him? Is this the

0:08:16.760 --> 0:08:19.920
<v Speaker 1>week the NFL suspends him? But you get him QB nineteen.

0:08:20.240 --> 0:08:23.000
<v Speaker 1>That's the tail end of your draft. You you can

0:08:23.040 --> 0:08:27.000
<v Speaker 1>always drop him and add another as you know, you know,

0:08:27.120 --> 0:08:28.880
<v Speaker 1>you know what. You've kind of convinced me you're right

0:08:28.880 --> 0:08:32.600
<v Speaker 1>at QB nineteen. It's fourteenth round. Yeah, I mean it's

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:35.079
<v Speaker 1>to ah is going right after him and then to

0:08:35.280 --> 0:08:37.080
<v Speaker 1>his I can pick up to him. He's not a

0:08:37.120 --> 0:08:39.360
<v Speaker 1>dead cat or anything like that. Then it's justin fields,

0:08:39.480 --> 0:08:42.040
<v Speaker 1>David Jones, I mean, Deshaun Watson plays. We're not going

0:08:42.120 --> 0:08:44.920
<v Speaker 1>to talk about is off the field stuff, but there's

0:08:44.960 --> 0:08:48.560
<v Speaker 1>certainly upside there because he had the most one yard

0:08:48.559 --> 0:08:53.240
<v Speaker 1>completions among all quarterbacks last year. He's the top five quarterback. Okay, okay,

0:08:53.240 --> 0:08:55.960
<v Speaker 1>but let's factor this in as well. He won't play

0:08:55.960 --> 0:08:58.000
<v Speaker 1>for the Texas. He doesn't want to play. This whole

0:08:58.000 --> 0:09:01.400
<v Speaker 1>thing before all of the criminal charges, I'll started, remember,

0:09:01.880 --> 0:09:05.040
<v Speaker 1>he wanted to leave the team. So you know, not

0:09:05.240 --> 0:09:07.480
<v Speaker 1>only do I need him to not be suspended, I

0:09:07.600 --> 0:09:11.360
<v Speaker 1>have to I have to have him decide he's willing

0:09:11.400 --> 0:09:14.920
<v Speaker 1>to play for the Texans, and that might not happen either.

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:17.680
<v Speaker 1>So you know that's the double lammy on him that

0:09:17.679 --> 0:09:20.680
<v Speaker 1>that worries me. Now that's not to say that Watson

0:09:21.320 --> 0:09:24.680
<v Speaker 1>somehow doesn't find himself on another team. I mean, it

0:09:24.840 --> 0:09:28.760
<v Speaker 1>takes balls of steel to have some other team. Let's

0:09:28.760 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 1>say Denver, where everybody wants Aaron Rodgers to go. General

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:37.080
<v Speaker 1>manager George Peyton would have to say, I'm willing to

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:40.680
<v Speaker 1>take the heat on bringing in a guy with twenty

0:09:40.720 --> 0:09:45.120
<v Speaker 1>two sexual assault charges against him, well, accusations against him,

0:09:45.160 --> 0:09:48.480
<v Speaker 1>not charges. Um, I'm willing to take the heat that

0:09:48.480 --> 0:09:50.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to get because I want Watson and I

0:09:50.920 --> 0:09:52.719
<v Speaker 1>don't think there's a GM who will do that. But

0:09:52.840 --> 0:09:56.880
<v Speaker 1>it's not Why doesn't Bay in a clean swap? Because

0:09:58.640 --> 0:10:00.800
<v Speaker 1>but there Rogers is want to play for them. He's

0:10:00.880 --> 0:10:04.400
<v Speaker 1>thirty six years old. Like, Okay, look if it were,

0:10:04.440 --> 0:10:06.120
<v Speaker 1>they're not in the same conference, so they're not going

0:10:06.160 --> 0:10:08.600
<v Speaker 1>to be uh sure, crossing each other's lines. I just

0:10:08.640 --> 0:10:13.199
<v Speaker 1>think I just think Bryan Goudkuts got enough problems. Adding

0:10:13.240 --> 0:10:17.120
<v Speaker 1>in twenty two sexual assault accusations is probably not something

0:10:17.120 --> 0:10:20.040
<v Speaker 1>that he wants to bring on himself. Let's turn our

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:23.760
<v Speaker 1>attention to a more, much more interesting team, the Indianapolis Colts.

0:10:25.080 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 1>There was a change of offensive coordinator quarterbacks coach. Last

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:32.960
<v Speaker 1>year's quarterbacks coach Marcus eber Flos is now taking over

0:10:33.000 --> 0:10:36.520
<v Speaker 1>for Nick Serrani, who got the Eagles job. But Frank

0:10:36.559 --> 0:10:39.079
<v Speaker 1>Wright is the mastermind of this offense and likely very

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:43.400
<v Speaker 1>little changes schematically. Last year, the Colts were a slightly

0:10:43.520 --> 0:10:46.640
<v Speaker 1>run heavy team, finishing ninth and run percentage, and why

0:10:46.640 --> 0:10:50.960
<v Speaker 1>not their best Their best skilled position player is Jonathan Taylor,

0:10:51.760 --> 0:10:54.079
<v Speaker 1>so let's start with him. After a quiet first ten

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:57.040
<v Speaker 1>games last year, Taylor went on an epic league winning

0:10:57.160 --> 0:11:01.880
<v Speaker 1>run from weeks UH eleven four award. His average line

0:11:02.000 --> 0:11:05.600
<v Speaker 1>in those games from week eleven forward twenty carries, one

0:11:06.200 --> 0:11:11.880
<v Speaker 1>seventeen yards, five point nine yards per carry, and one

0:11:11.960 --> 0:11:15.920
<v Speaker 1>point one touchdowns per game. About yeah, that is That

0:11:16.120 --> 0:11:20.160
<v Speaker 1>is rock star territory for Jonathan Taylor. They also won

0:11:20.200 --> 0:11:22.360
<v Speaker 1>five of those seven games, which I mentioned because I

0:11:22.400 --> 0:11:25.000
<v Speaker 1>think it's really important because when you win five of

0:11:25.120 --> 0:11:27.720
<v Speaker 1>seven by and you gave the ball to Jonathan Taylor

0:11:27.760 --> 0:11:30.040
<v Speaker 1>twenty times, that creates a mandate for this year to

0:11:30.120 --> 0:11:34.920
<v Speaker 1>keep giving the ball to Jonathan Taylor. Um Frank Reich, however,

0:11:36.040 --> 0:11:40.800
<v Speaker 1>has a long history of running back by committee, and

0:11:40.840 --> 0:11:44.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm not totally sold that Taylor is gonna be twenty

0:11:44.840 --> 0:11:47.520
<v Speaker 1>carries every game, or even just the work horse back

0:11:47.559 --> 0:11:50.400
<v Speaker 1>every game, because Reich's got that long history of not

0:11:50.160 --> 0:11:53.680
<v Speaker 1>not going that way. And we still got Nahim Hines,

0:11:54.559 --> 0:11:59.920
<v Speaker 1>Marlon Mack, Jordan Wilkins, and everybody listening knows those guys

0:12:00.040 --> 0:12:04.440
<v Speaker 1>hop up for big games with disturbing regularity and you

0:12:04.440 --> 0:12:08.400
<v Speaker 1>can't see them coming. So I still think there's just

0:12:08.840 --> 0:12:12.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of danger with Jonathan Taylor that people

0:12:12.400 --> 0:12:15.920
<v Speaker 1>aren't really thinking about at his current ADP, which is

0:12:15.920 --> 0:12:18.680
<v Speaker 1>the middle of the first round, so people are taking

0:12:18.679 --> 0:12:23.280
<v Speaker 1>the leap taking him over and uh and certainly zeke

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:25.760
<v Speaker 1>and uh um and I would do actually I think

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:28.360
<v Speaker 1>I would as well. But there is inherent risk, like

0:12:28.400 --> 0:12:30.959
<v Speaker 1>you're saying, because of this Frank Rake situation. His current

0:12:30.960 --> 0:12:34.280
<v Speaker 1>ADP is running back eight, going mid to late round one,

0:12:34.480 --> 0:12:36.439
<v Speaker 1>and you know, it does make sense. I don't have

0:12:36.480 --> 0:12:40.080
<v Speaker 1>a problem with him going there, but man, I just

0:12:40.320 --> 0:12:46.680
<v Speaker 1>did again. You know, if you're if it's picked, I

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:48.960
<v Speaker 1>still want I want to work course back there. I

0:12:48.960 --> 0:12:51.760
<v Speaker 1>don't want to. I'm just I'm nervous about the possible

0:12:51.800 --> 0:12:53.840
<v Speaker 1>time share, because that's who Frank Reik span. All right,

0:12:53.880 --> 0:12:56.160
<v Speaker 1>let's go to the passing game. Carson Wentz prime for

0:12:56.160 --> 0:12:58.280
<v Speaker 1>a bounce back season. I think he's an excellent candidate

0:12:58.280 --> 0:13:00.600
<v Speaker 1>to win Comeback Player of the Year. He will play

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:05.480
<v Speaker 1>behind a better offensive line than Philly's always injured version.

0:13:06.120 --> 0:13:09.559
<v Speaker 1>Wentz handled pressure badly last year and made a lot

0:13:09.600 --> 0:13:14.400
<v Speaker 1>of bad decisions under pressure where he looked terrible. His

0:13:14.520 --> 0:13:19.120
<v Speaker 1>swagger was completely shot. He you know, everything unraveled badly.

0:13:21.520 --> 0:13:26.520
<v Speaker 1>The offensive line is better, although Anthony Costanzo retired and

0:13:26.520 --> 0:13:28.320
<v Speaker 1>they brought in Eric Fisher to fill in for him.

0:13:28.320 --> 0:13:30.880
<v Speaker 1>That should be okay. But Profitball Focus ranks the Colts

0:13:30.920 --> 0:13:34.040
<v Speaker 1>offensive line is number two in the NFL. So Wentz

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:37.760
<v Speaker 1>is going to have time to set up and that

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:40.600
<v Speaker 1>part is encouraging and also encouraging the fact that he's

0:13:40.640 --> 0:13:43.880
<v Speaker 1>reunited with Frank Reich, who was in Philadelphia for once

0:13:43.920 --> 0:13:47.160
<v Speaker 1>his best years. He's got good receivers, he's got capable

0:13:47.240 --> 0:13:50.960
<v Speaker 1>tight ends, he's got past catching backs. He's an ideal

0:13:51.080 --> 0:13:54.439
<v Speaker 1>second quarterback for your roster with quarterback one upside. His

0:13:54.520 --> 0:14:04.800
<v Speaker 1>ADP right now is quarterback twenty in the round. UM

0:14:06.240 --> 0:14:08.800
<v Speaker 1>this year. Quarterback is so deep and I think has

0:14:08.880 --> 0:14:11.240
<v Speaker 1>ever been. I think it is the deepest it's ever been.

0:14:11.720 --> 0:14:13.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's talk about the wide receivers. I'm just done on

0:14:13.840 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 1>t Y Hilton and apparently you are too, because his

0:14:16.880 --> 0:14:19.800
<v Speaker 1>his his ADP has slumped down to a wide receiver

0:14:19.960 --> 0:14:25.880
<v Speaker 1>fifty one Brian, that's round eleven UM. Last year he

0:14:26.120 --> 0:14:29.120
<v Speaker 1>led the team in targets, receptions, receiving yards and receiving

0:14:29.160 --> 0:14:32.600
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns and nobody wants to touch him. I'm still all

0:14:32.600 --> 0:14:36.000
<v Speaker 1>those numbers I mentioned your targets, receptions, receiving yards, receiving touchdowns.

0:14:36.800 --> 0:14:38.640
<v Speaker 1>He led the team, but he only had fifty six

0:14:38.720 --> 0:14:42.840
<v Speaker 1>catches for seven hundred fifty yards and five touchdowns because

0:14:43.040 --> 0:14:46.920
<v Speaker 1>he was so cheap weekend in week out, draft kings, draftings,

0:14:47.320 --> 0:14:49.840
<v Speaker 1>and he burned me weekend and week I could not

0:14:49.920 --> 0:14:52.040
<v Speaker 1>help myself. I'm like, okay, I gotta keep going back

0:14:52.040 --> 0:14:53.680
<v Speaker 1>to the well because if I don't, I know he's

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:56.400
<v Speaker 1>but he never did. He had one good game that

0:14:56.440 --> 0:14:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I can recall. He finished his wide receiver forty one

0:14:59.320 --> 0:15:02.000
<v Speaker 1>last year, and so is adp s wide receiver fifty one.

0:15:02.160 --> 0:15:06.400
<v Speaker 1>That's actually probably makes sense for where t Y Hilton

0:15:06.480 --> 0:15:08.800
<v Speaker 1>is in his career arc right now because of the

0:15:08.880 --> 0:15:14.480
<v Speaker 1>return of uh Paris Campbell. Yeah, alright, let's talk about

0:15:14.520 --> 0:15:17.360
<v Speaker 1>Paris Cambel who made you jump ahead? And okay, that's fine.

0:15:17.400 --> 0:15:19.440
<v Speaker 1>I love Paris Campbell, and I'm like the only guy

0:15:19.520 --> 0:15:22.080
<v Speaker 1>that I'm with you, Me, you, Sigmund Bloom, I think

0:15:22.080 --> 0:15:23.960
<v Speaker 1>are the only three that like him. Uh, he's a

0:15:24.000 --> 0:15:26.040
<v Speaker 1>wild card, and you think he'll open the season as

0:15:26.080 --> 0:15:28.400
<v Speaker 1>the slot receiver. He was a second round draft pick

0:15:28.440 --> 0:15:30.840
<v Speaker 1>three years ago, and it's been hobbled by a crazy

0:15:30.960 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 1>series of injuries, none of which I think are really

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:35.440
<v Speaker 1>that reflective of who he is, and a lot of

0:15:35.520 --> 0:15:38.880
<v Speaker 1>them are just odd ball injuries, and I just I

0:15:38.920 --> 0:15:42.480
<v Speaker 1>want to believe that he's He's ultimately going to make

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:46.440
<v Speaker 1>good on the remarkable athleticism he showed that led him

0:15:46.480 --> 0:15:48.440
<v Speaker 1>to being his second round pick. He's at the Byron

0:15:48.480 --> 0:15:51.480
<v Speaker 1>Buckston in the NFL. Yeah, that might be well. Buckston

0:15:51.520 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 1>has proven more then Paris Campbell has barely been on

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:56.920
<v Speaker 1>the field long enough to prove anything. But man, the

0:15:57.000 --> 0:16:00.240
<v Speaker 1>upside is there. And last pick your draft can sitter

0:16:00.320 --> 0:16:02.960
<v Speaker 1>Paris Campbell. I like it. Michael Pittman is the future, though,

0:16:03.000 --> 0:16:05.080
<v Speaker 1>and he's going to lead the team in all categories.

0:16:05.120 --> 0:16:09.040
<v Speaker 1>I believe this year. From Week eight forward. Last year,

0:16:09.720 --> 0:16:12.320
<v Speaker 1>he got targeted at least five times in six of

0:16:12.360 --> 0:16:14.480
<v Speaker 1>the final nine games. He caught at least two balls

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:17.160
<v Speaker 1>in every game, was on the field for of the snaps,

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 1>which I loved. His current ADP for Michael Pittman is

0:16:20.040 --> 0:16:24.960
<v Speaker 1>the ninth round as wide receiver, thirty nine. That's whatever

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:28.440
<v Speaker 1>twelve spots ahead of t Y Hilton. I think that's right, Yeah, definitely,

0:16:28.520 --> 0:16:30.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm really intrigued by what he can do in year two.

0:16:30.840 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 1>T Y Hilton clearly the third receiver you'd want on

0:16:33.440 --> 0:16:37.560
<v Speaker 1>this team, and like a distant thirds Campbell as well.

0:16:37.600 --> 0:16:39.920
<v Speaker 1>You think, okay, all right, well you're not like camb

0:16:39.920 --> 0:16:42.480
<v Speaker 1>a lot more than everybody else. People listening right now

0:16:42.480 --> 0:16:44.920
<v Speaker 1>are based on airp if we're baking in a DP

0:16:45.080 --> 0:16:48.080
<v Speaker 1>without a doubt, But don't touch t Y wild Also,

0:16:48.160 --> 0:16:50.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm not touching the tight ends um, even though Carson

0:16:50.440 --> 0:16:53.040
<v Speaker 1>Wentz grew up feeding Philadelphia's tight ends. You've got Jack

0:16:53.080 --> 0:16:55.480
<v Speaker 1>Doyle and mo Ali Cox and they're gonna split time

0:16:55.560 --> 0:16:59.520
<v Speaker 1>just like last year. And no, it's not exactly a

0:16:59.680 --> 0:17:04.639
<v Speaker 1>Zack Lee Um. Neither one put up even remotely startable

0:17:04.640 --> 0:17:08.199
<v Speaker 1>fantasy numbers and we're utterly unpredictable last year, so we're

0:17:08.200 --> 0:17:10.560
<v Speaker 1>not gonna even We're not gonna go there. The riskiest

0:17:10.600 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 1>player at his current a DP. It's it's hard to

0:17:15.240 --> 0:17:17.439
<v Speaker 1>find risk because there's only one player. Get this, and

0:17:17.480 --> 0:17:21.480
<v Speaker 1>the entire Cults roster. One player is going before round nine,

0:17:22.600 --> 0:17:24.600
<v Speaker 1>Jonathan t So, I mean that's you know, it's the

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:27.560
<v Speaker 1>only guy I can even list for riskiest at current

0:17:27.600 --> 0:17:31.040
<v Speaker 1>ADP and as I said earlier, his dangers are entirely

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:34.080
<v Speaker 1>volume related, not talent related. The player with the most

0:17:34.160 --> 0:17:37.280
<v Speaker 1>upside compared to current ADP here tons of options because

0:17:37.280 --> 0:17:40.320
<v Speaker 1>everybody's going every else is going round nine or later. Um,

0:17:40.359 --> 0:17:42.160
<v Speaker 1>I think it's Michael Pittman, who I said it's gonna

0:17:42.240 --> 0:17:46.200
<v Speaker 1>lead the team and all the receiving categories and going

0:17:46.280 --> 0:17:49.800
<v Speaker 1>off the board at receiver thirty nine gives you ninth round.

0:17:49.840 --> 0:17:53.400
<v Speaker 1>You know you've got a lot of upside. I love

0:17:53.520 --> 0:17:56.840
<v Speaker 1>the the idea of targeting Pittman and Campbell and best

0:17:56.880 --> 0:17:58.600
<v Speaker 1>Ball how cheap can get them and ozz are you're

0:17:58.600 --> 0:18:01.159
<v Speaker 1>gonna get the number one receiver for the cold in

0:18:01.200 --> 0:18:03.480
<v Speaker 1>any given game, in any given I like that angle.

0:18:03.600 --> 0:18:05.359
<v Speaker 1>That's a that's a nice one now and and you know,

0:18:05.400 --> 0:18:07.080
<v Speaker 1>when you actually got to set your lineup, that's a

0:18:07.119 --> 0:18:09.760
<v Speaker 1>little more of a headaches. But best Ball, don't worry

0:18:09.760 --> 0:18:12.520
<v Speaker 1>about it. When we come back, we will talk through

0:18:12.840 --> 0:18:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the Tennessee Titans, the Jacksonville Jaguars, the Titans influx with

0:18:16.440 --> 0:18:20.439
<v Speaker 1>a sudden injection of Julio Jones into their lineup, Jacksonville

0:18:20.600 --> 0:18:24.359
<v Speaker 1>influx across the entire offense. So we'll tell you about

0:18:24.400 --> 0:18:27.359
<v Speaker 1>those two teams when we come back to Fantasy Football Weekly,

0:18:28.920 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 1>Segment number two. Fantasy Football Weekly, Paul Chiarchi and Brian

0:18:32.200 --> 0:18:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Johnson with you. We already broke down Houston and Indianapolis.

0:18:37.920 --> 0:18:40.320
<v Speaker 1>As we continue going through the a f C South,

0:18:40.920 --> 0:18:44.600
<v Speaker 1>let's turn our attention to the Tennessee Titans. Brian, and

0:18:45.119 --> 0:18:48.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, the lead story is Julio Jones, but you

0:18:48.320 --> 0:18:52.720
<v Speaker 1>know the lead player is still going to be Derrick Henry.

0:18:52.960 --> 0:18:56.000
<v Speaker 1>It's certainly gonna be Derrick Henry. Tennessee ran the ball

0:18:56.119 --> 0:18:58.119
<v Speaker 1>more than fifty percent of the time last year. It

0:18:58.200 --> 0:19:00.640
<v Speaker 1>was the third highest clip in the NFL. All means

0:19:00.720 --> 0:19:04.640
<v Speaker 1>they ran the ball the most among all teams under

0:19:04.720 --> 0:19:07.040
<v Speaker 1>fifty percent of the time. And that that's not that's

0:19:07.760 --> 0:19:10.760
<v Speaker 1>but that's not a necessarily a balanced offense, not in

0:19:10.840 --> 0:19:14.720
<v Speaker 1>today's NFL. That's not, in today's NFL a very effective offense. Though.

0:19:14.760 --> 0:19:17.439
<v Speaker 1>They were fourth in yards per game, fourth and points

0:19:17.480 --> 0:19:20.520
<v Speaker 1>per game. But uh, like you said, it all revolved

0:19:20.520 --> 0:19:23.560
<v Speaker 1>around Derrick Henry. We're all too familiar with Derrick Henry

0:19:23.560 --> 0:19:26.800
<v Speaker 1>in the run game. Uh, Henry still a beast pretty

0:19:26.880 --> 0:19:29.679
<v Speaker 1>much in the prime of his career. Titans are returning

0:19:29.760 --> 0:19:33.439
<v Speaker 1>what is a pretty good offensive line, ranked fourteenth by

0:19:33.480 --> 0:19:36.879
<v Speaker 1>Pro Football Focus going into this season. UH finished sixth

0:19:37.000 --> 0:19:40.040
<v Speaker 1>in their run blocking grading system last year, but in

0:19:40.119 --> 0:19:44.440
<v Speaker 1>past blocking UM that's probably because left tackle Taylor lu

0:19:44.480 --> 0:19:49.200
<v Speaker 1>Ann Louanne or Loui lu Luwan only played nine snaps.

0:19:49.400 --> 0:19:52.240
<v Speaker 1>He missed a good chunk of the season, so Tannehill

0:19:52.760 --> 0:19:56.600
<v Speaker 1>was missing his blindside protection. UM. The only really but

0:19:56.680 --> 0:19:59.360
<v Speaker 1>back to King Henry, the only real concern is will

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:02.720
<v Speaker 1>they lightened his load after totaling six hundred and eighty

0:20:02.800 --> 0:20:05.960
<v Speaker 1>one carries over the last two years. I know that's

0:20:06.080 --> 0:20:08.680
<v Speaker 1>that part. That is a that's a real concern, and honestly,

0:20:09.160 --> 0:20:13.240
<v Speaker 1>they probably should. New offensive coordinator Todd Downing would be wise,

0:20:13.320 --> 0:20:15.680
<v Speaker 1>in my opinion, to dial it back at least a

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:19.159
<v Speaker 1>little bit. But when they dial that back, what do

0:20:19.240 --> 0:20:22.119
<v Speaker 1>they die in link up? The assumption is Julio Jones.

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:25.320
<v Speaker 1>One would think now that Julio Jones isn't toe UM,

0:20:25.640 --> 0:20:29.000
<v Speaker 1>so that Ryan Tannehill's stock has gone way up since that.

0:20:29.160 --> 0:20:33.320
<v Speaker 1>And by the way, Tannehill the six the most passing

0:20:33.359 --> 0:20:36.760
<v Speaker 1>touchdowns last year with thirty three. Uh, he finished eighteen

0:20:37.040 --> 0:20:40.520
<v Speaker 1>in past attempts and that's good efficiency, right, very efficient.

0:20:40.560 --> 0:20:43.160
<v Speaker 1>He also had seven rushing touchdowns too. I didn't realize

0:20:43.160 --> 0:20:45.000
<v Speaker 1>he had that many rushing touchdowns that I knew you'd

0:20:45.040 --> 0:20:47.080
<v Speaker 1>have like three, four, maybe five, But he had seven,

0:20:47.200 --> 0:20:51.320
<v Speaker 1>so forty total touchdowns last year. And his price tag

0:20:51.400 --> 0:20:55.120
<v Speaker 1>reflects it right now currently QB twelve, which is quite

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:57.879
<v Speaker 1>the honor in these days. Is he said quarterback is

0:20:58.080 --> 0:21:00.760
<v Speaker 1>ridiculously deep, so it to be a top soll have quarterback.

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:03.240
<v Speaker 1>That's really saying something. And again it's it's all about

0:21:03.280 --> 0:21:06.359
<v Speaker 1>the wide receiver room now with A J. Brown, Julio

0:21:06.480 --> 0:21:09.119
<v Speaker 1>Jones of course, and uh, Josh Reynolds. I guess who

0:21:09.200 --> 0:21:12.919
<v Speaker 1>was who was something before the h the Julio acquisition,

0:21:13.040 --> 0:21:16.600
<v Speaker 1>But um, sticking with the wide receivers, A J. Brown

0:21:17.160 --> 0:21:20.760
<v Speaker 1>is my riskiest guy based on ADP for the Titans

0:21:21.160 --> 0:21:24.439
<v Speaker 1>um eleven touchdowns last year over a thousand yards, only

0:21:24.440 --> 0:21:27.400
<v Speaker 1>a hundred and two targets. Of course, Corey Davis was there,

0:21:27.760 --> 0:21:30.600
<v Speaker 1>but he's gone replaced by Julio Jones. Johnny Smith was there,

0:21:31.160 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 1>he's gone. Really only one tight end Anthony Firkster and

0:21:34.760 --> 0:21:38.800
<v Speaker 1>very popular sleeper for for sir, no tea oh firk, sir,

0:21:39.000 --> 0:21:43.520
<v Speaker 1>thank you sir. But um, everyone before Julio was acquired

0:21:43.840 --> 0:21:45.879
<v Speaker 1>was like a J. Brown a lock for a hundred

0:21:45.880 --> 0:21:49.800
<v Speaker 1>and fifty tarrogets plus easily after only getting barely over

0:21:49.800 --> 0:21:53.679
<v Speaker 1>a hundred last year. That changed drastically when Julio came

0:21:53.720 --> 0:21:56.600
<v Speaker 1>to town. So what if a J. Brown doesn't see

0:21:56.640 --> 0:21:59.600
<v Speaker 1>a huge upticking targets? What if Tennessee continues to be

0:21:59.720 --> 0:22:02.720
<v Speaker 1>run heavy, which there's the reason they really shouldn't improved

0:22:02.760 --> 0:22:05.800
<v Speaker 1>defense and uh even you know, more weapons to take

0:22:05.840 --> 0:22:08.320
<v Speaker 1>the pressure off at Derrick Henry. So the fact that

0:22:09.040 --> 0:22:11.000
<v Speaker 1>a J. Brown is going off the board at wide

0:22:11.040 --> 0:22:14.800
<v Speaker 1>receiver eight and he m he's just not a true

0:22:15.080 --> 0:22:18.600
<v Speaker 1>alpha yet, especially with he is. He has the making

0:22:20.119 --> 0:22:21.920
<v Speaker 1>he is, but I don't know if he's gonna see

0:22:21.960 --> 0:22:26.400
<v Speaker 1>more targets with Michael Thomas, Keenan Allen, Allen Robinson, Terry McLaurin.

0:22:26.440 --> 0:22:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Guys going after a J. Brown, You don't get me wrong,

0:22:29.640 --> 0:22:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Like Dynasty wise, a J. Brown wide receiver one, no concerns,

0:22:33.640 --> 0:22:38.760
<v Speaker 1>but just specifically speaking, I would take him at wide

0:22:38.800 --> 0:22:42.000
<v Speaker 1>receiver bride receiver eight to me, is a value for

0:22:42.400 --> 0:22:44.000
<v Speaker 1>for a j Brown. That's how much I like him.

0:22:44.000 --> 0:22:47.480
<v Speaker 1>I think Julio is let's talk Julio for a minute. Alright,

0:22:47.600 --> 0:22:51.399
<v Speaker 1>So last year's wide receiver eighteen right eighteen and that's

0:22:51.400 --> 0:22:56.320
<v Speaker 1>almost exactly right, right, Um, Julio, if he had stayed

0:22:56.359 --> 0:23:03.760
<v Speaker 1>with the Falcons, would be boring for frustrating, injured oft injured. Uh.

0:23:03.840 --> 0:23:05.440
<v Speaker 1>There's a litany of owners that have had him the

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:08.159
<v Speaker 1>past few years that have sworn off Julio Jones because

0:23:08.359 --> 0:23:09.679
<v Speaker 1>you know how many times you have to see him

0:23:09.680 --> 0:23:11.800
<v Speaker 1>as questionable. How many times are you fretting on Sunday

0:23:11.840 --> 0:23:14.520
<v Speaker 1>morning whether Julio Jones is going to be playing today

0:23:14.960 --> 0:23:17.359
<v Speaker 1>and will this play be his last play? And we're just,

0:23:17.480 --> 0:23:19.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, fred up with that. But you put him

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:21.000
<v Speaker 1>in this change of scenery and all of a sudden

0:23:21.040 --> 0:23:23.359
<v Speaker 1>he's fascinating and people are and people seem to have

0:23:23.440 --> 0:23:26.680
<v Speaker 1>forgotten all of the frustrations that Julio Jones have Hall

0:23:26.680 --> 0:23:28.640
<v Speaker 1>of Fame receiver. And don't get me wrong, when healthy

0:23:28.720 --> 0:23:33.960
<v Speaker 1>Julio Jones a freaking nightmare. But because he's broken down

0:23:34.080 --> 0:23:36.800
<v Speaker 1>so much, I just I just think people are are

0:23:37.880 --> 0:23:42.880
<v Speaker 1>are overly they're overly willing to look past Julio Jones

0:23:42.920 --> 0:23:45.639
<v Speaker 1>as warts because he's got a fresh start in a

0:23:45.680 --> 0:23:48.439
<v Speaker 1>new city. But those words aren't necessarily any different here

0:23:48.480 --> 0:23:52.560
<v Speaker 1>than they were before. And Atlanta was as past happy

0:23:52.640 --> 0:23:55.160
<v Speaker 1>as any team over the past three four five years,

0:23:55.600 --> 0:23:57.360
<v Speaker 1>and now he goes to the team that's exact opposite.

0:23:57.400 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 1>The volume should be down this year for Julio Jones.

0:24:00.600 --> 0:24:03.119
<v Speaker 1>I think the move. I think the move if anything

0:24:03.280 --> 0:24:07.119
<v Speaker 1>hurts Julio Jones value. He was my second candidate for

0:24:07.240 --> 0:24:10.640
<v Speaker 1>the biggest downside, and I should say a j. Brown

0:24:10.640 --> 0:24:13.200
<v Speaker 1>doesn't have big downside. I could see him dropping to

0:24:13.240 --> 0:24:15.680
<v Speaker 1>the wide receiver twelve fifteen range, but you're paying wide

0:24:15.720 --> 0:24:18.440
<v Speaker 1>receiver eight that's the very premium price. I don't really

0:24:18.480 --> 0:24:20.720
<v Speaker 1>like Julio Jones wide receiver eighteen either, for all the

0:24:20.760 --> 0:24:23.719
<v Speaker 1>reasons you just mentioned. They're they're both. They're both kind

0:24:23.720 --> 0:24:27.080
<v Speaker 1>of risky because everyone they're like real shiny new teammate

0:24:27.160 --> 0:24:29.800
<v Speaker 1>toys right now. But again, this could be all about

0:24:30.320 --> 0:24:32.680
<v Speaker 1>Derrick Henry like it was the last couple of years.

0:24:32.760 --> 0:24:37.480
<v Speaker 1>But I love Brown. I know I can't. There's it's

0:24:37.520 --> 0:24:40.080
<v Speaker 1>tough to find rationally, so but I just I have him.

0:24:40.200 --> 0:24:43.560
<v Speaker 1>Was wide receiver three. He was wide receiver one before

0:24:43.720 --> 0:24:46.640
<v Speaker 1>the Julio Jones trade, and I've begrudgingly moved him down

0:24:46.720 --> 0:24:50.320
<v Speaker 1>too spots. It's really a four man fantasy team from

0:24:50.760 --> 0:24:53.800
<v Speaker 1>Henry Jones and Brown and Dan Hill. So I went

0:24:53.880 --> 0:24:56.560
<v Speaker 1>with a J. Brown. It was a tough those four

0:24:57.200 --> 0:25:00.680
<v Speaker 1>all of my roster. But you mentioned Anthon Firkser. He

0:25:00.840 --> 0:25:04.560
<v Speaker 1>is my highest upside player. People were his stock was

0:25:04.760 --> 0:25:07.000
<v Speaker 1>going way up before the Julio signing. He was essentially

0:25:07.640 --> 0:25:11.360
<v Speaker 1>uh the second wide receiver on that team over Josh Reynolds,

0:25:11.359 --> 0:25:13.959
<v Speaker 1>and Firkser had some good games last year even when

0:25:14.040 --> 0:25:16.040
<v Speaker 1>john who Smith was healthy, and when Johnny was out,

0:25:16.080 --> 0:25:18.680
<v Speaker 1>he was a primary target for Tanne Hill. So right

0:25:18.720 --> 0:25:23.959
<v Speaker 1>now Ferkes are his tight end seven three And if

0:25:24.000 --> 0:25:27.840
<v Speaker 1>something happens to a J. Brown Julio Jones, yeah, I've

0:25:27.840 --> 0:25:30.680
<v Speaker 1>got first star at seventeen right now. Um, And and

0:25:30.840 --> 0:25:32.760
<v Speaker 1>he was he was higher. I think I'm at fourteen

0:25:32.760 --> 0:25:35.160
<v Speaker 1>before the Julio Jones trade. I still think he there's

0:25:35.160 --> 0:25:37.720
<v Speaker 1>a lot there. And remember Todd Downing, the offensive coordinator,

0:25:37.840 --> 0:25:41.200
<v Speaker 1>was the tight end. He knows, he knows what Fokster

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:44.360
<v Speaker 1>is all up. So a great backup dart throw tight

0:25:44.480 --> 0:25:46.720
<v Speaker 1>end but uh not as great as Dan Arnold. All right,

0:25:48.280 --> 0:25:53.400
<v Speaker 1>let's go to the Jacksonville Jaguars. What has changed? Everything

0:25:53.560 --> 0:25:56.720
<v Speaker 1>has changed, coaches, all new coaches. Urban Meyer makes his

0:25:56.840 --> 0:26:00.520
<v Speaker 1>NFL debut. The offensive coordinator is Darryl Bevel, which is

0:26:00.600 --> 0:26:02.480
<v Speaker 1>nice because we do have a long book on Darryl Bevil.

0:26:02.520 --> 0:26:04.320
<v Speaker 1>We know a lot, we know of what to expect.

0:26:04.680 --> 0:26:07.879
<v Speaker 1>Bebel was a very run heavy coach when he was

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:12.640
<v Speaker 1>offensive coordinator in Minnesota and at Seattle. But he had

0:26:12.720 --> 0:26:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Adrian Peterson and Marshawn Lynch, two Hall of famers, yes

0:26:18.600 --> 0:26:23.119
<v Speaker 1>first ballot probably well, Peterson for sure. For Man he

0:26:23.200 --> 0:26:27.320
<v Speaker 1>probably will be too. Then Detroit brought in Bevil to

0:26:27.400 --> 0:26:30.440
<v Speaker 1>be their offensive coordinator the past two years, and he

0:26:30.520 --> 0:26:33.600
<v Speaker 1>did not have an Adrian Peterson or Marshawn Lynch. And

0:26:33.760 --> 0:26:36.080
<v Speaker 1>he had a terrible defense that was just giving up

0:26:36.160 --> 0:26:39.240
<v Speaker 1>tons and tons of points and he did not have

0:26:39.480 --> 0:26:43.119
<v Speaker 1>any longer the luxury of running as much, and Bevel

0:26:43.320 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 1>ended up ranking over the past two years twenty nine

0:26:46.960 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 1>and twenty in rushing play percentage, way down from when

0:26:51.800 --> 0:26:54.280
<v Speaker 1>he used to be a top five guy with Adrian

0:26:54.320 --> 0:26:57.679
<v Speaker 1>Peterson and Marshawn Lynch. So I think we're looking at

0:26:57.720 --> 0:27:00.280
<v Speaker 1>the same thing with Bevil. He I think he wants

0:27:00.320 --> 0:27:03.520
<v Speaker 1>to run when he can. But the Jaguars defense is

0:27:03.520 --> 0:27:07.159
<v Speaker 1>gonna be just as bad as the lines defensive, so

0:27:08.160 --> 0:27:09.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, this may be a little bit more of

0:27:09.800 --> 0:27:13.240
<v Speaker 1>a balanced offense under Darryl Bubble. The offensive lines is

0:27:13.640 --> 0:27:16.720
<v Speaker 1>kind of a bumber. The Jaguars return all five starters,

0:27:17.320 --> 0:27:20.600
<v Speaker 1>which I love continuity on the offensive line, but they

0:27:20.680 --> 0:27:23.800
<v Speaker 1>finished twenty second. They ranked two for line play last

0:27:23.880 --> 0:27:26.240
<v Speaker 1>year by Pro Football Focus, and I don't know you

0:27:26.320 --> 0:27:28.200
<v Speaker 1>bring all those guys back. They put the franchise tag

0:27:28.280 --> 0:27:30.760
<v Speaker 1>on left tackle Cam Robinson, who was ben Bait was

0:27:30.760 --> 0:27:32.880
<v Speaker 1>a bad He's had a bad He was a first

0:27:32.960 --> 0:27:36.280
<v Speaker 1>rounder who has had mostly an underwhelming career until last year.

0:27:36.359 --> 0:27:39.240
<v Speaker 1>His mon his money year, and he played at like

0:27:39.320 --> 0:27:42.240
<v Speaker 1>an average NFL level, and out of desperation, they tagged

0:27:42.280 --> 0:27:43.480
<v Speaker 1>him because I think they didn't want to have to

0:27:43.560 --> 0:27:46.240
<v Speaker 1>draft a left tackle and they had plenty of money,

0:27:46.320 --> 0:27:49.159
<v Speaker 1>so why not just tag him and kick that can

0:27:49.320 --> 0:27:51.159
<v Speaker 1>down the road one season on what you're gonna do

0:27:51.200 --> 0:27:53.760
<v Speaker 1>a left tackle? Nothing like a contract year to motivate

0:27:53.840 --> 0:27:57.639
<v Speaker 1>you to average little status. Correct. Jackson will also drafted

0:27:57.680 --> 0:27:59.600
<v Speaker 1>Walker Little in the second round this year. But he's

0:27:59.600 --> 0:28:02.480
<v Speaker 1>a major project and may not start this season, so

0:28:02.560 --> 0:28:04.680
<v Speaker 1>the offensive lines of Bomber, So just keep that in

0:28:04.720 --> 0:28:06.400
<v Speaker 1>mind all other things we're gonna talk about. Let's talk

0:28:06.400 --> 0:28:09.640
<v Speaker 1>Trevor Lawrence. He will be your Week one starter. Obviously.

0:28:09.840 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 1>He is as pro ready as any rookie quarterback since

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 1>Andrew luck The in Dynasty super Flex. He's the first

0:28:17.400 --> 0:28:21.600
<v Speaker 1>overall pick in rookie drafts in my opinion. And even

0:28:21.640 --> 0:28:23.879
<v Speaker 1>if you don't need a quarterback and you can't trade

0:28:23.960 --> 0:28:27.760
<v Speaker 1>it immediately, the pick you got that you can deal

0:28:27.840 --> 0:28:29.639
<v Speaker 1>him later. You got that arrow in your quill, right,

0:28:30.560 --> 0:28:32.560
<v Speaker 1>I like that. Most of you know a lot about

0:28:32.560 --> 0:28:35.720
<v Speaker 1>Trevor Lawrence because he's performing on a highly visible stage

0:28:35.760 --> 0:28:37.880
<v Speaker 1>for a long time. But just allow me to reiterate

0:28:38.080 --> 0:28:43.520
<v Speaker 1>his remarkable abilities. Laser arm, incredible football i Q, terrific

0:28:43.560 --> 0:28:47.360
<v Speaker 1>against the blitz and NFL level of pocket poise, better

0:28:47.440 --> 0:28:50.200
<v Speaker 1>wheels than people think. He can run in four or five, six,

0:28:50.280 --> 0:28:54.160
<v Speaker 1>seven touchdowns this season. I think you know, ten years

0:28:54.200 --> 0:28:56.560
<v Speaker 1>from now he's probably not gonna be a mobile quarterback,

0:28:56.960 --> 0:28:59.920
<v Speaker 1>but especially here in these early days, he's got he's

0:29:00.000 --> 0:29:03.800
<v Speaker 1>got wheels, and he can he can run something. Jacksonville

0:29:03.840 --> 0:29:08.280
<v Speaker 1>had the highest passing play percentage last year. Again, all

0:29:08.280 --> 0:29:11.280
<v Speaker 1>those coaches are gone, um and that was with Mike

0:29:11.360 --> 0:29:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Glennon Glennon Gardner, Minshew and Jake Lewton. So you know

0:29:15.040 --> 0:29:18.080
<v Speaker 1>they were forced into passing by this terrible defense last season.

0:29:18.120 --> 0:29:19.720
<v Speaker 1>They're going to see a lot of that. Lawrence is

0:29:19.760 --> 0:29:22.720
<v Speaker 1>gonna throw a lot. Volume will be there, Talent is there.

0:29:22.960 --> 0:29:25.280
<v Speaker 1>He's right now is a DPS Quarterback fifteen, which I

0:29:25.320 --> 0:29:30.320
<v Speaker 1>think feels about right for Trevor Lawrence. People either sort

0:29:30.360 --> 0:29:34.480
<v Speaker 1>of banking on him as a low end QB one

0:29:34.640 --> 0:29:39.600
<v Speaker 1>or a high end backup basically range. Uh, let's go

0:29:39.640 --> 0:29:41.880
<v Speaker 1>to the white outs. We'll talk about laviska channel in

0:29:41.960 --> 0:29:44.480
<v Speaker 1>a few minutes. DJ Chark is an all or nothing

0:29:44.760 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 1>producer who's a deep downfield guy. He had that dynamite

0:29:48.280 --> 0:29:50.479
<v Speaker 1>season two years ago, so three years ago, he did

0:29:50.680 --> 0:29:53.560
<v Speaker 1>nothing as a rookie. Two years ago, explodes on the

0:29:53.640 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 1>scene a hundred or thousand yards and came out of nowhere.

0:29:56.720 --> 0:29:58.480
<v Speaker 1>He had like a one hundred yard rookie or and

0:29:58.480 --> 0:30:02.040
<v Speaker 1>put out a thousand yard sophomores season. And then last year, Nah,

0:30:02.880 --> 0:30:05.520
<v Speaker 1>he scored just twice after Week four only managed seven

0:30:05.600 --> 0:30:08.320
<v Speaker 1>hundred yards. He was he was ding up all year

0:30:08.360 --> 0:30:12.280
<v Speaker 1>long after he was Now he gets a big, armed,

0:30:12.400 --> 0:30:14.960
<v Speaker 1>accurate quarterback, and I think Chark is going to be

0:30:15.000 --> 0:30:19.040
<v Speaker 1>a fascinating guy with some serious upside because of the

0:30:19.240 --> 0:30:23.040
<v Speaker 1>deep connection he can have with Trevor Lawrence. His ADP

0:30:23.200 --> 0:30:25.800
<v Speaker 1>right now, his wide receiver twenty eight. That's round seven.

0:30:26.240 --> 0:30:29.200
<v Speaker 1>He's the first receiver taken among the Jaguars by you

0:30:29.440 --> 0:30:33.640
<v Speaker 1>fantasy drafters. Marvin Jones has been a steady fantasy producer,

0:30:33.680 --> 0:30:36.240
<v Speaker 1>but his talent levels clearly behind Chark and Channel, and

0:30:36.280 --> 0:30:39.000
<v Speaker 1>I worried that he's gonna have some invisible games, which

0:30:39.040 --> 0:30:40.600
<v Speaker 1>has always been a problem for him in both Detroit

0:30:40.680 --> 0:30:44.640
<v Speaker 1>and Cincinnati earlier in his career. Now, in fairness, Marvin

0:30:44.720 --> 0:30:47.480
<v Speaker 1>Jones always lives up to his ADP, in fact surpasses

0:30:47.520 --> 0:30:50.360
<v Speaker 1>his ADP. Nobody ever wants to draft him, and then

0:30:50.360 --> 0:30:52.320
<v Speaker 1>you got him on your team and he's like almost

0:30:52.360 --> 0:30:54.720
<v Speaker 1>every week starter and more often than not, you get

0:30:54.840 --> 0:30:58.280
<v Speaker 1>something from him. So right now is ADP is the

0:30:58.360 --> 0:31:01.760
<v Speaker 1>twelfth round. I think he's receiver seventy one. I didn't

0:31:01.760 --> 0:31:03.360
<v Speaker 1>write down, but as I recall, I think he was

0:31:03.400 --> 0:31:06.280
<v Speaker 1>receiver seventy one off the board. That seems pretty good

0:31:06.280 --> 0:31:08.840
<v Speaker 1>from Rvin Jones. I'll buy all day at that range.

0:31:08.880 --> 0:31:10.720
<v Speaker 1>For sure. We're not even gonna talk about tight ends,

0:31:10.720 --> 0:31:13.600
<v Speaker 1>including Tim Tebow because in my estimation, they don't have

0:31:13.680 --> 0:31:17.080
<v Speaker 1>any running backs. Tim Tebow is going to score the

0:31:17.120 --> 0:31:19.200
<v Speaker 1>first touchdown of the year for the Jaguars. I'm putting

0:31:19.200 --> 0:31:22.000
<v Speaker 1>it on wax right now. I love it. I want

0:31:22.040 --> 0:31:26.120
<v Speaker 1>to see the problem. Love it, kevn't. It's gonna be

0:31:26.640 --> 0:31:30.400
<v Speaker 1>but BS two. It's not even gonna be like a

0:31:30.920 --> 0:31:34.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, like run it in. It'll light end past battern.

0:31:34.040 --> 0:31:37.000
<v Speaker 1>It's yeah, it's gonna be some subject. It'll be like

0:31:37.120 --> 0:31:40.240
<v Speaker 1>some jet sweep to the tight end. Yeah. Uh, James,

0:31:40.520 --> 0:31:42.600
<v Speaker 1>we're gonna We're gonna circle back to James Robinson in

0:31:42.680 --> 0:31:45.000
<v Speaker 1>a minute. Let me let's talk Trevis e t n

0:31:45.400 --> 0:31:49.920
<v Speaker 1>amazing burst, so many big highlight players in college. Shockingly strong,

0:31:50.080 --> 0:31:55.080
<v Speaker 1>breaks tackles, elusive, good receiver, but probably not a workhorse back.

0:31:55.920 --> 0:32:00.840
<v Speaker 1>His last twenty carry game was in went to eighteen

0:32:01.440 --> 0:32:04.120
<v Speaker 1>for Travis e TN. Was he in high school but

0:32:04.240 --> 0:32:07.040
<v Speaker 1>almost Um. The worry is that he's going to fall

0:32:07.120 --> 0:32:11.520
<v Speaker 1>into this eight touch game, ten touch game. Twelve touch

0:32:11.680 --> 0:32:14.320
<v Speaker 1>game and it's gonna be hard to get fantasy value

0:32:14.320 --> 0:32:17.760
<v Speaker 1>out of that. He's gonna be like Reggie Bush. That's yes,

0:32:17.880 --> 0:32:21.880
<v Speaker 1>that's a great comparison. Reggie Bush was never an ongoing

0:32:22.040 --> 0:32:27.200
<v Speaker 1>fantasy factor, reliable fantasy factor because he just didn't get

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:31.640
<v Speaker 1>the ball enough. Um. But that's enough too, seriously, Mescal,

0:32:31.720 --> 0:32:34.400
<v Speaker 1>James Robinson, we'll talk about a minute now. Maybe we're wrong.

0:32:35.040 --> 0:32:38.600
<v Speaker 1>And if if ETN could get into the fourteen, sixteen,

0:32:39.680 --> 0:32:43.760
<v Speaker 1>even eighteen will be great touch territory. Etn could be

0:32:43.760 --> 0:32:47.200
<v Speaker 1>a star because he's so talented and he could reward

0:32:47.240 --> 0:32:48.920
<v Speaker 1>his owners. If you think he's going to get up

0:32:48.960 --> 0:32:51.920
<v Speaker 1>to that level, he really needs to be active in

0:32:52.000 --> 0:32:54.520
<v Speaker 1>the passing game weekend in week out, four or five

0:32:54.640 --> 0:32:57.560
<v Speaker 1>catches consistently to really live up to his ADP to

0:32:57.640 --> 0:33:00.280
<v Speaker 1>get like Reggie Bush needed that because the Carrs weren't

0:33:00.280 --> 0:33:03.280
<v Speaker 1>always there for Reggie Bush. That's such a good comparison.

0:33:03.320 --> 0:33:04.880
<v Speaker 1>I haven't heard anybody else make that, and that's a

0:33:04.960 --> 0:33:07.680
<v Speaker 1>great one. Let's talk about the riskiest player at his

0:33:07.760 --> 0:33:10.680
<v Speaker 1>current ADP, and it's James Robinson running back twenty two

0:33:10.840 --> 0:33:13.560
<v Speaker 1>round four. Uh. He was found money last year, but

0:33:13.680 --> 0:33:16.080
<v Speaker 1>I don't see a repeat happening. Teams who love their

0:33:16.120 --> 0:33:20.280
<v Speaker 1>running back and have a need at like every other position,

0:33:20.480 --> 0:33:23.160
<v Speaker 1>like the Jaguars do, don't spend a first round pick

0:33:23.200 --> 0:33:27.120
<v Speaker 1>on a running back. E t N is going to

0:33:27.240 --> 0:33:32.400
<v Speaker 1>factor in enough to chisel away serious value from James Robinson. Now,

0:33:32.600 --> 0:33:35.000
<v Speaker 1>nobody expects Robinson to account for eight six percent of

0:33:35.040 --> 0:33:37.360
<v Speaker 1>the team's rushing attempts again like he did last year.

0:33:37.360 --> 0:33:40.040
<v Speaker 1>And if you recall, like through something like we twelve,

0:33:40.160 --> 0:33:41.720
<v Speaker 1>he had all but two of the carries for the

0:33:41.760 --> 0:33:43.320
<v Speaker 1>team and it was only the very end of the

0:33:43.400 --> 0:33:45.400
<v Speaker 1>year when a few other people got in and got

0:33:45.480 --> 0:33:49.600
<v Speaker 1>some carries. Um. But the question is how far down

0:33:49.760 --> 0:33:52.000
<v Speaker 1>is he gonna go? How far James Robinson is gonna

0:33:52.000 --> 0:33:54.440
<v Speaker 1>get less work? But how much less work is it

0:33:54.560 --> 0:33:57.520
<v Speaker 1>going to be? I think it's gonna be a significant

0:33:57.520 --> 0:33:59.920
<v Speaker 1>amount because E t N is about a grillion time

0:34:00.000 --> 0:34:08.920
<v Speaker 1>times better than James Robinson. Grillian Grilli a lot grilling. Wait, no,

0:34:09.320 --> 0:34:12.960
<v Speaker 1>isn't hit hold on, it's nine times. That's how much

0:34:12.960 --> 0:34:16.319
<v Speaker 1>a Grillian is. A grillion is nine times better than

0:34:16.440 --> 0:34:21.399
<v Speaker 1>James Robinson. UM. One other X factor that I haven't

0:34:21.400 --> 0:34:26.560
<v Speaker 1>heard anybody say about James Robinson. This all new coaching

0:34:26.640 --> 0:34:30.160
<v Speaker 1>staff has no allegiance to James Robinson. They didn't pick him.

0:34:30.680 --> 0:34:32.879
<v Speaker 1>They spent their first round pick and their second pick.

0:34:33.920 --> 0:34:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Urban Meyer spent his second ever NFL pick on Travis E.

0:34:37.200 --> 0:34:41.040
<v Speaker 1>T N. You know, no a lot, no allegiance to

0:34:41.120 --> 0:34:43.279
<v Speaker 1>James Robinson. Best man can just win that job. And

0:34:43.360 --> 0:34:46.799
<v Speaker 1>if the best man wins that job, it's not James Robinson. Well, well,

0:34:46.880 --> 0:34:49.680
<v Speaker 1>last I checked, they were basically right next to each

0:34:49.680 --> 0:34:53.640
<v Speaker 1>other in ADP, So gun to head, you gotta gotta

0:34:53.719 --> 0:34:58.000
<v Speaker 1>have one around or I'm pretty sure that's where they're at.

0:34:58.000 --> 0:35:00.719
<v Speaker 1>Who do you want most formats? I'm taking Travis E.

0:35:00.840 --> 0:35:03.200
<v Speaker 1>T N now in a guillotine league format where I

0:35:03.320 --> 0:35:05.320
<v Speaker 1>I don't I don't want to sweat week one. You know,

0:35:05.440 --> 0:35:07.360
<v Speaker 1>rookies are always a way more dangerous there, and I

0:35:07.400 --> 0:35:10.200
<v Speaker 1>don't know if Travis E. T N is as much

0:35:10.280 --> 0:35:11.719
<v Speaker 1>of a factor in week one as he will be

0:35:11.800 --> 0:35:15.080
<v Speaker 1>in November and December when he's learned all the nuances

0:35:15.400 --> 0:35:18.239
<v Speaker 1>of being a third down back pass catching, the route

0:35:18.320 --> 0:35:19.719
<v Speaker 1>running and all the things that will go into that

0:35:20.239 --> 0:35:23.439
<v Speaker 1>good point player with the most upside compared to current

0:35:23.520 --> 0:35:28.640
<v Speaker 1>ADP not close Lavishka Channel current ADP is the tenth

0:35:28.800 --> 0:35:32.160
<v Speaker 1>round wide receiver forty four. He is the best receiver

0:35:32.520 --> 0:35:35.960
<v Speaker 1>on the Jaguars, terrific down the stretch last year. Wow,

0:35:35.960 --> 0:35:40.920
<v Speaker 1>would everybody in mini camp is this past month, Channel

0:35:41.040 --> 0:35:45.040
<v Speaker 1>looks ready to explode With Trevor Lawrence. You may have

0:35:45.160 --> 0:35:49.080
<v Speaker 1>forgotten unless you heard us talking about sophomore receivers a

0:35:49.120 --> 0:35:52.000
<v Speaker 1>couple of weeks ago on Fantasy Football Weekly that he

0:35:52.160 --> 0:35:56.160
<v Speaker 1>scored four times in the final five weeks of last year,

0:35:56.200 --> 0:35:59.200
<v Speaker 1>and from week twelve forward he was wide receiver twenty

0:35:59.320 --> 0:36:05.240
<v Speaker 1>two chel catching passes from Jake Lewton and Gardner Minshew

0:36:05.560 --> 0:36:07.200
<v Speaker 1>and Mike Glennon, and he was why do you see

0:36:07.200 --> 0:36:08.520
<v Speaker 1>her twenty two and he's going up the ports? Why

0:36:08.520 --> 0:36:10.080
<v Speaker 1>do you see her forty four right now? And now

0:36:10.160 --> 0:36:13.680
<v Speaker 1>he's luten free. He's luten free. I did forget that.

0:36:13.800 --> 0:36:15.919
<v Speaker 1>Thank you for him healing Cole now with the Jets

0:36:15.960 --> 0:36:17.799
<v Speaker 1>stole a lot of his work from the slot last year.

0:36:18.080 --> 0:36:21.879
<v Speaker 1>He's gone so and he leaves behind four snaps from

0:36:21.960 --> 0:36:28.000
<v Speaker 1>the slot for Laviska Channel. He has top twelve upside

0:36:28.680 --> 0:36:31.560
<v Speaker 1>Channel does if they decide to focus that passing game

0:36:31.640 --> 0:36:34.480
<v Speaker 1>on his freakish athletic ability, and you know they're gonna

0:36:34.520 --> 0:36:36.600
<v Speaker 1>try to give him a couple of carries per game

0:36:36.680 --> 0:36:39.759
<v Speaker 1>most weeks and uh and he returns kicks to those

0:36:39.800 --> 0:36:41.880
<v Speaker 1>don't always produce points, but sometimes they do. It's a

0:36:41.920 --> 0:36:45.480
<v Speaker 1>nice something. It's nice to have that option. Chanel's got

0:36:45.719 --> 0:36:48.800
<v Speaker 1>I'm i'm I love him as to I'll produce his

0:36:48.880 --> 0:36:54.560
<v Speaker 1>wide receiver for ADP Channel's Fascinating Player. Next week, we

0:36:54.640 --> 0:36:56.439
<v Speaker 1>wrap up the a f C with the trip through

0:36:56.520 --> 0:36:59.680
<v Speaker 1>the a f C West Brian. That means, um we

0:36:59.800 --> 0:37:04.840
<v Speaker 1>get to talk about my favorite dark horse team to

0:37:04.960 --> 0:37:08.360
<v Speaker 1>make the Super Bowl from the a f C, the

0:37:08.480 --> 0:37:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Los Angeles Chargers. H that is where I'm at. If

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:18.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm making a bit odds implied, of course, and I would,

0:37:18.360 --> 0:37:22.040
<v Speaker 1>I would parlay it with air Bear Justin Herbert for

0:37:22.200 --> 0:37:25.000
<v Speaker 1>m v PNP because if that happens, air Bear is

0:37:25.000 --> 0:37:26.719
<v Speaker 1>gonna have an m v P type season and he

0:37:27.000 --> 0:37:29.520
<v Speaker 1>certainly is capable. Yeah. Now I look forward to that.

0:37:29.640 --> 0:37:31.360
<v Speaker 1>They got to get through their own division in the Chiefs,

0:37:31.480 --> 0:37:34.840
<v Speaker 1>which is no small task, but anything happens to Patrick

0:37:34.920 --> 0:37:38.440
<v Speaker 1>Mahomes and that helps pave the way. And you know,

0:37:39.320 --> 0:37:42.000
<v Speaker 1>if you think back to week two, and I probably

0:37:42.040 --> 0:37:45.680
<v Speaker 1>shouldn't put so much stock in this one game. It's

0:37:46.400 --> 0:37:50.840
<v Speaker 1>five minutes before kickoff of week two to Rod Taylor

0:37:51.440 --> 0:37:55.279
<v Speaker 1>gets the misinjection from his uh from from his coach

0:37:55.320 --> 0:37:57.920
<v Speaker 1>and gets a collapsed along or whatever it was. It

0:37:58.000 --> 0:38:07.400
<v Speaker 1>was basically like John Travolta giving um and um and

0:38:07.520 --> 0:38:10.840
<v Speaker 1>here comes here. They are facing the Chiefs and Patrick

0:38:10.960 --> 0:38:17.120
<v Speaker 1>mahomes and justin air Bear comes in cold and nearly

0:38:17.400 --> 0:38:21.120
<v Speaker 1>beats the Chiefs in that game. It's um. It's only

0:38:21.160 --> 0:38:23.880
<v Speaker 1>one game, small sample size. And remember the Chargers, by

0:38:23.880 --> 0:38:27.960
<v Speaker 1>the way, they won their final four or five games

0:38:28.040 --> 0:38:30.959
<v Speaker 1>of last year, and and there were seven win team

0:38:31.760 --> 0:38:34.279
<v Speaker 1>and their head coach costs them at least two or

0:38:34.320 --> 0:38:38.279
<v Speaker 1>three wins by himself, Anthony Lynn, and he's gone. So

0:38:39.320 --> 0:38:41.120
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's a lot to like for those Chargers.

0:38:41.320 --> 0:38:45.040
<v Speaker 1>That's gonna be a fun division West. It almost always is.

0:38:45.760 --> 0:38:48.080
<v Speaker 1>We'll break that down next Weekly. Thanks you, thank you

0:38:48.120 --> 0:38:49.360
<v Speaker 1>for listening all the way to the end of a

0:38:49.400 --> 0:38:52.200
<v Speaker 1>thirty nine ishue minute podcast, and we will talk to

0:38:52.239 --> 0:38:56.360
<v Speaker 1>you next week. Everybody, Bye bye. Fantasy Football Weekly is

0:38:56.400 --> 0:38:59.080
<v Speaker 1>a production of I Heart Radio. For more podcast from

0:38:59.080 --> 0:39:02.319
<v Speaker 1>my Heart Radio, visit the i heart radio, app, Apple podcasts,

0:39:02.480 --> 0:39:04.440
<v Speaker 1>or wherever you listen to your favorite shows.