1 00:00:02,920 --> 00:00:10,600 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. You're listening to the 2 00:00:10,640 --> 00:00:14,560 Speaker 1: Bloomberg Balance of Power podcast. Catch us live weekdays at 3 00:00:14,560 --> 00:00:16,959 Speaker 1: noon Eastern on Apple car Play and then Roun Auto 4 00:00:17,040 --> 00:00:20,079 Speaker 1: with the Bloomberg Business App. Listen on demand wherever you 5 00:00:20,160 --> 00:00:25,320 Speaker 1: get your podcasts, or watch us live on YouTube. 6 00:00:25,720 --> 00:00:28,800 Speaker 2: Given it is Tuesday, that means we are now exactly 7 00:00:28,960 --> 00:00:33,080 Speaker 2: ten weeks out until election Day, seventy days for those 8 00:00:33,120 --> 00:00:35,519 Speaker 2: of you who are accounting, and we can bet the candidates, 9 00:00:35,520 --> 00:00:38,080 Speaker 2: we'll be spending a significant chunk of these next seventy 10 00:00:38,159 --> 00:00:41,519 Speaker 2: days on the campaign trail, specifically in the key battleground 11 00:00:41,560 --> 00:00:44,800 Speaker 2: states that ultimately will decide the outcome of this election. 12 00:00:44,880 --> 00:00:47,240 Speaker 2: We're already seeing that this week with Trump and Vance 13 00:00:47,280 --> 00:00:50,000 Speaker 2: in Michigan. They'll have to Pennsylvania later on this week 14 00:00:50,040 --> 00:00:50,360 Speaker 2: as well. 15 00:00:50,400 --> 00:00:50,559 Speaker 3: Well. 16 00:00:50,880 --> 00:00:53,640 Speaker 2: Kamala Harris and Tim Wallas are getting set to depart 17 00:00:53,720 --> 00:00:58,000 Speaker 2: on a bus tour of Georgia that begins tomorrow. So 18 00:00:58,600 --> 00:01:00,160 Speaker 2: let's get into all of this now with one of 19 00:01:00,160 --> 00:01:02,440 Speaker 2: our reporters on the campaign trail who was actually here 20 00:01:02,480 --> 00:01:05,039 Speaker 2: in Washington this week, or at least for these few days. 21 00:01:05,080 --> 00:01:08,039 Speaker 2: Stephanieli covers politics for US at Bloomberg and is joining 22 00:01:08,040 --> 00:01:09,800 Speaker 2: me in studio. So, Stephanie, I know it's only a 23 00:01:09,800 --> 00:01:11,680 Speaker 2: matter of time before you're back out on the trail 24 00:01:11,720 --> 00:01:14,560 Speaker 2: with these candidates, but it does feel like the pace 25 00:01:14,680 --> 00:01:17,120 Speaker 2: is picking up. And we understand this is by design, 26 00:01:17,120 --> 00:01:20,360 Speaker 2: at least on the Trump Vance campaign team, given all 27 00:01:20,360 --> 00:01:24,240 Speaker 2: of the oxygen and energy present in the Harris campaign, 28 00:01:24,280 --> 00:01:27,560 Speaker 2: they are starting to plan to spend more of their time. 29 00:01:27,400 --> 00:01:27,800 Speaker 4: On the road. 30 00:01:28,000 --> 00:01:31,119 Speaker 5: You're certainly right, And if we remember just two weeks ago, 31 00:01:31,280 --> 00:01:33,600 Speaker 5: Trump had only spent maybe two days on the road, 32 00:01:33,840 --> 00:01:36,800 Speaker 5: and so the pace that they're going is significantly more 33 00:01:37,120 --> 00:01:39,400 Speaker 5: intense than they were just you know, earlier this month 34 00:01:39,480 --> 00:01:41,600 Speaker 5: when it seemed like they were competing against Joe Biden 35 00:01:41,600 --> 00:01:44,240 Speaker 5: for the presidency. And as you mentioned, of course, part 36 00:01:44,280 --> 00:01:46,440 Speaker 5: of this is because of all the oxygen that Kamala 37 00:01:46,480 --> 00:01:49,600 Speaker 5: Harrison her campaign is taking up, but also it's just, 38 00:01:49,720 --> 00:01:51,920 Speaker 5: you know, it's ten weeks out until the election. We 39 00:01:52,040 --> 00:01:54,040 Speaker 5: know that the Harris Walls ticket is going to be 40 00:01:54,200 --> 00:01:58,560 Speaker 5: barnstorming day after day, and so it's just it's the 41 00:01:59,200 --> 00:02:00,840 Speaker 5: name of the game really at this point. 42 00:02:01,200 --> 00:02:03,440 Speaker 2: Yeah, it doesn't wait till after Labor Day, it seems 43 00:02:03,480 --> 00:02:05,640 Speaker 2: in this cycle. It's getting going in this week before 44 00:02:05,720 --> 00:02:07,960 Speaker 2: Labor Day. There's also the question though, of the resources 45 00:02:07,960 --> 00:02:09,640 Speaker 2: to be able to keep this up over the next 46 00:02:09,639 --> 00:02:11,880 Speaker 2: ten weeks. As we've talked a lot about the fundraising 47 00:02:11,919 --> 00:02:14,160 Speaker 2: machine the Harris campaign has been to this point over 48 00:02:14,200 --> 00:02:16,639 Speaker 2: half a billion dollars raised. How are we likely to 49 00:02:16,680 --> 00:02:24,280 Speaker 2: see Trump advance events changing with finance financial considerations in mind, 50 00:02:24,400 --> 00:02:26,320 Speaker 2: Perhaps not as many big rallies. 51 00:02:26,440 --> 00:02:28,760 Speaker 5: We've actually seen that play out, at least in these 52 00:02:28,840 --> 00:02:30,800 Speaker 5: last couple of weeks when he has been picking up 53 00:02:30,800 --> 00:02:33,919 Speaker 5: more of his campaign schedule. There's a handful of events 54 00:02:33,960 --> 00:02:37,639 Speaker 5: every week that tend to be a smaller audience, maybe 55 00:02:37,760 --> 00:02:41,079 Speaker 5: you know, at a sheriff's department or in just a 56 00:02:41,160 --> 00:02:43,840 Speaker 5: smaller arena really where he can still gather supporters, but 57 00:02:43,880 --> 00:02:47,440 Speaker 5: it doesn't necessarily associate with the cost of buying out 58 00:02:47,480 --> 00:02:51,200 Speaker 5: an entire arena, filling out an entire you know, stadium 59 00:02:51,280 --> 00:02:54,280 Speaker 5: with supporters. But this allows him to have a more 60 00:02:54,320 --> 00:02:57,760 Speaker 5: personalized experience with some of his voters in these key 61 00:02:57,760 --> 00:02:58,799 Speaker 5: swing states well. 62 00:02:58,800 --> 00:03:00,840 Speaker 2: And it also becomes a question of the message he's 63 00:03:00,880 --> 00:03:03,200 Speaker 2: bringing and the ticket is bringing as a whole to 64 00:03:03,240 --> 00:03:05,920 Speaker 2: these states. We have seen Donald Trump openly questioning the 65 00:03:06,080 --> 00:03:09,040 Speaker 2: advice of his own team when it comes to focusing 66 00:03:09,040 --> 00:03:12,639 Speaker 2: on policy and not personal attacks against Harris or others. Well, 67 00:03:12,720 --> 00:03:15,480 Speaker 2: Jady Vance does seem like he is talking more about policy. 68 00:03:15,520 --> 00:03:18,440 Speaker 2: He's supposed to talk about economic policy, specifically in Michigan 69 00:03:19,040 --> 00:03:20,880 Speaker 2: today he was talking about abortion and to Meet the 70 00:03:20,919 --> 00:03:24,400 Speaker 2: Press interview over this past weekend. Are we seeing for 71 00:03:24,440 --> 00:03:26,600 Speaker 2: all of the talk about Jade Vance possibly being able 72 00:03:26,600 --> 00:03:28,720 Speaker 2: to serve as the attack dog for Donald Trump with 73 00:03:29,040 --> 00:03:31,239 Speaker 2: his selection as his running mate, that actually it's Trump 74 00:03:31,280 --> 00:03:33,160 Speaker 2: who's still the attack dog and Jade Vance is the 75 00:03:33,160 --> 00:03:35,160 Speaker 2: one who's actually articulating policy. 76 00:03:35,480 --> 00:03:37,160 Speaker 5: I think it's a really great point. And part of 77 00:03:37,160 --> 00:03:39,440 Speaker 5: that is because some of the appeal of Donald Trump 78 00:03:39,520 --> 00:03:42,920 Speaker 5: is his personality, right, It's the personalized attacks that he 79 00:03:42,960 --> 00:03:45,200 Speaker 5: makes on his opponents, and that's something that his supporters 80 00:03:45,240 --> 00:03:48,040 Speaker 5: really admire and like of him because he doesn't come 81 00:03:48,040 --> 00:03:50,360 Speaker 5: off as a politician. So the fact that he's able 82 00:03:50,400 --> 00:03:53,160 Speaker 5: to still do that while his running mate takes on 83 00:03:53,200 --> 00:03:56,160 Speaker 5: some of more of that policy discussion does seem to 84 00:03:56,160 --> 00:03:58,960 Speaker 5: be playing out, you know exactly how you mentioned it. 85 00:03:59,440 --> 00:04:02,160 Speaker 2: Well, speaking of how things are playing out, we of 86 00:04:02,200 --> 00:04:05,839 Speaker 2: course saw a very energetic convention in Chicago last week 87 00:04:05,840 --> 00:04:09,280 Speaker 2: for the Democrats culminating, and that's acceptance speech from Kamala Harris. 88 00:04:09,520 --> 00:04:11,560 Speaker 2: Haven't seen much of her since then. She's not getting 89 00:04:11,600 --> 00:04:13,880 Speaker 2: back out on the trail in physical form at least 90 00:04:13,960 --> 00:04:16,520 Speaker 2: until tomorrow, and we still don't know if she's sitting 91 00:04:16,560 --> 00:04:18,800 Speaker 2: down for that big interview she said she wanted to 92 00:04:18,800 --> 00:04:21,080 Speaker 2: schedule before the month of August is out. There's only 93 00:04:21,080 --> 00:04:24,359 Speaker 2: four days left there in August, Stephanie. When are we 94 00:04:24,400 --> 00:04:25,600 Speaker 2: going to start seeing more from her? 95 00:04:25,839 --> 00:04:28,000 Speaker 5: I mean, so part of that is that they said 96 00:04:28,000 --> 00:04:29,960 Speaker 5: they would have its scheduled by the end of the month, 97 00:04:29,960 --> 00:04:31,919 Speaker 5: so that might not necessarily mean that she does the 98 00:04:31,960 --> 00:04:34,440 Speaker 5: sit down interview before then. But I think that you're 99 00:04:34,520 --> 00:04:37,719 Speaker 5: right in that she hasn't been as out there. She 100 00:04:37,760 --> 00:04:40,360 Speaker 5: hasn't been as accessible to the press as Donald Trump 101 00:04:40,440 --> 00:04:42,679 Speaker 5: has been, and that's exactly what their campaign is focusing 102 00:04:42,760 --> 00:04:45,120 Speaker 5: on the fact that she's you know, quote unquote hiding 103 00:04:45,160 --> 00:04:49,280 Speaker 5: behind her advisors and not necessarily getting her message out there. 104 00:04:49,279 --> 00:04:51,520 Speaker 5: And there's still a lot of questions about what policies 105 00:04:51,560 --> 00:04:54,599 Speaker 5: she's standing behind, how to actually see them through, and 106 00:04:54,640 --> 00:04:57,040 Speaker 5: so that's really what we're looking for you know, as 107 00:04:57,120 --> 00:04:59,880 Speaker 5: we get into these last ten weeks of this election cycle. 108 00:05:00,279 --> 00:05:02,200 Speaker 5: But time will tell, but it does seem like they 109 00:05:02,240 --> 00:05:05,000 Speaker 5: are picking up their campaign schedule quite a bit. 110 00:05:05,160 --> 00:05:07,719 Speaker 2: So beginning with the bus tour in Georgia tomorrow and 111 00:05:07,760 --> 00:05:10,479 Speaker 2: then assuming they might have a pace similar to the 112 00:05:10,480 --> 00:05:13,520 Speaker 2: Trump Vance ticket beyond that after Labor Day. 113 00:05:13,720 --> 00:05:15,840 Speaker 5: It certainly looks like that would be the case. I mean, 114 00:05:15,960 --> 00:05:18,320 Speaker 5: especially with the fact that there is only seventy or 115 00:05:18,320 --> 00:05:20,760 Speaker 5: so days left. That really is the only way to 116 00:05:21,000 --> 00:05:22,400 Speaker 5: get your name out there to voters. 117 00:05:22,760 --> 00:05:24,320 Speaker 2: Well, and of course it's not just about getting your 118 00:05:24,360 --> 00:05:26,560 Speaker 2: name out there, it's about getting people to give you 119 00:05:26,640 --> 00:05:29,400 Speaker 2: money as well. We talked about the kind of money 120 00:05:29,400 --> 00:05:31,520 Speaker 2: that Harris has been bringing in, but Jadie Vance is 121 00:05:31,560 --> 00:05:33,880 Speaker 2: starting to pull some money into given his ties to 122 00:05:34,240 --> 00:05:37,840 Speaker 2: Silicon Valley. We understand some big named donors are organizing 123 00:05:37,880 --> 00:05:40,280 Speaker 2: events for him both in New York and California in 124 00:05:40,320 --> 00:05:40,960 Speaker 2: the coming weeks. 125 00:05:41,240 --> 00:05:43,520 Speaker 5: Yeah, so one of the main reasons why Jade Vance 126 00:05:43,600 --> 00:05:45,719 Speaker 5: was picked as the renting mate was just because of 127 00:05:45,720 --> 00:05:48,120 Speaker 5: the ties that he has two really wealthy donors and 128 00:05:48,120 --> 00:05:50,960 Speaker 5: the peal that he has with these folks. And so 129 00:05:51,240 --> 00:05:53,359 Speaker 5: in the next two or three weeks. He has a 130 00:05:53,360 --> 00:05:56,960 Speaker 5: couple fundraisers lined up, one of which in Los Angeles, California, 131 00:05:57,040 --> 00:06:00,000 Speaker 5: with David Sachs, and another in New York with Jacob 132 00:06:00,040 --> 00:06:03,479 Speaker 5: helperg who runs Pallenteer is a co founder, and so 133 00:06:04,000 --> 00:06:06,400 Speaker 5: you know, just these names really signal that there is 134 00:06:06,440 --> 00:06:09,440 Speaker 5: a shift among you know, big tech, you know, big 135 00:06:09,480 --> 00:06:12,040 Speaker 5: Wall Street money coming in to support Trump. And that's 136 00:06:12,080 --> 00:06:14,320 Speaker 5: something that their campaign has been really highlighting in the 137 00:06:14,360 --> 00:06:15,840 Speaker 5: last couple of weeks, all. 138 00:06:15,800 --> 00:06:17,320 Speaker 2: Right, and of course over the last couple of weeks 139 00:06:17,320 --> 00:06:19,520 Speaker 2: and this entire cycle thus far, Stephanie Lai has been 140 00:06:19,720 --> 00:06:22,440 Speaker 2: covering the campaigns for US. Great to see you here 141 00:06:22,440 --> 00:06:24,440 Speaker 2: in Washington. Thank you so much for joining me. Now, 142 00:06:24,480 --> 00:06:27,000 Speaker 2: as we continue to talk about the messaging coming out 143 00:06:27,000 --> 00:06:28,600 Speaker 2: of these campaigns and the way in which they are 144 00:06:28,640 --> 00:06:31,480 Speaker 2: spending the money that they're raising, we know that Kamala 145 00:06:31,520 --> 00:06:33,279 Speaker 2: Harris has a big ad buy that's going to be 146 00:06:33,320 --> 00:06:35,560 Speaker 2: running through Labor Day and of course even more ad 147 00:06:35,560 --> 00:06:38,280 Speaker 2: buys coming after Labor Day. One launching today though in 148 00:06:38,279 --> 00:06:42,320 Speaker 2: some of these key swing states, is specifically about the economy. 149 00:06:42,839 --> 00:06:46,160 Speaker 2: It's titled every Day, and its cites some of the 150 00:06:46,160 --> 00:06:48,360 Speaker 2: things she said in her speech in North Carolina earlier 151 00:06:48,400 --> 00:06:50,719 Speaker 2: this month, when she outlined policy proposals when it comes 152 00:06:50,760 --> 00:06:54,640 Speaker 2: to affordable housing or price gouging. For example, here's a 153 00:06:54,680 --> 00:06:55,360 Speaker 2: little taste. 154 00:06:56,920 --> 00:07:01,000 Speaker 6: I will be laser focused on creating opportunity for the 155 00:07:01,040 --> 00:07:07,040 Speaker 6: middle class that advance their economic security, stability, and dignity. 156 00:07:07,279 --> 00:07:11,120 Speaker 6: If you want to know someone cares about, look who 157 00:07:11,160 --> 00:07:15,600 Speaker 6: they fight for. I'll try fights for bllionaires and large corporations. 158 00:07:16,000 --> 00:07:18,520 Speaker 6: I will fight to give money back to working in 159 00:07:18,560 --> 00:07:19,800 Speaker 6: middle class Americans. 160 00:07:22,320 --> 00:07:26,280 Speaker 2: But how is that kind of messaging resonating with voters, 161 00:07:27,080 --> 00:07:29,960 Speaker 2: especially when she's part of this Biden administration. In the 162 00:07:30,000 --> 00:07:32,760 Speaker 2: economy under Biden is something that a lot of voters 163 00:07:32,760 --> 00:07:35,760 Speaker 2: don't feel thrilled about. So to get into this conversation. 164 00:07:35,840 --> 00:07:37,800 Speaker 2: Now joining me in studio is Cliff Young. He is 165 00:07:38,040 --> 00:07:40,680 Speaker 2: US Public Affairs President at ipso's polling and of course 166 00:07:40,680 --> 00:07:43,400 Speaker 2: has been looking into the economy issue and other issues 167 00:07:43,640 --> 00:07:46,000 Speaker 2: throughout this entire cycle. So you put out a piece 168 00:07:46,080 --> 00:07:48,559 Speaker 2: last week, Cliff, and it's good to see you here 169 00:07:49,000 --> 00:07:54,480 Speaker 2: in studio about Biden's inflation orphans. Does Kamala Harris easily 170 00:07:54,520 --> 00:07:58,360 Speaker 2: adopt those inflation orphans? Are we seeing signs that she's 171 00:07:58,920 --> 00:08:03,040 Speaker 2: having some success, more so with the economy question than 172 00:08:03,080 --> 00:08:03,680 Speaker 2: Biden was. 173 00:08:03,880 --> 00:08:06,720 Speaker 3: Yeah, well, first and foremost, the primary issue is inflation 174 00:08:06,840 --> 00:08:11,600 Speaker 3: in the economy. Inflation, inflation, inflation, and that was Biden's 175 00:08:11,640 --> 00:08:15,040 Speaker 3: primary problem. He was weak in the polls. His numbers 176 00:08:15,080 --> 00:08:17,240 Speaker 3: were weak because of that. And what we can say 177 00:08:17,320 --> 00:08:20,080 Speaker 3: is we still don't know. I think we need to 178 00:08:20,120 --> 00:08:24,440 Speaker 3: wait a bit to see how Harris does. But part 179 00:08:24,480 --> 00:08:27,080 Speaker 3: of her jump in the polls is a function of 180 00:08:27,120 --> 00:08:32,520 Speaker 3: these very constituencies being more enthusiastic towards her in respect 181 00:08:32,559 --> 00:08:35,400 Speaker 3: to the inflation. So some effect in the short term 182 00:08:35,520 --> 00:08:38,439 Speaker 3: right now, whether it's a long term effect, we don't know. 183 00:08:38,679 --> 00:08:42,800 Speaker 3: What we can say definitively is that Harris and the 184 00:08:42,880 --> 00:08:45,559 Speaker 3: campaign are on message well. 185 00:08:45,400 --> 00:08:48,240 Speaker 2: And some of the things that they're saying are still 186 00:08:48,360 --> 00:08:51,480 Speaker 2: rather vague policy ideas, but specific enough that you have 187 00:08:51,760 --> 00:08:54,000 Speaker 2: folks here on Bloomberg, for example, questioning whether or all 188 00:08:54,040 --> 00:08:55,959 Speaker 2: these are things that actually work in reality, like when 189 00:08:55,960 --> 00:08:58,800 Speaker 2: it comes to price gouging or no tax on tips, 190 00:08:58,800 --> 00:09:00,920 Speaker 2: which is something Donald Trump is floating as well, that 191 00:09:01,400 --> 00:09:06,280 Speaker 2: many who are deficit wary say that could actually create 192 00:09:06,320 --> 00:09:08,840 Speaker 2: a bigger fiscal issue, But how does it actually resonate 193 00:09:08,880 --> 00:09:13,200 Speaker 2: with voters who may not be prioritizing those considerations, thinking 194 00:09:13,200 --> 00:09:14,480 Speaker 2: more about their own kitchen table. 195 00:09:14,800 --> 00:09:18,600 Speaker 3: These are populous measures. These are measures designed to win 196 00:09:18,640 --> 00:09:22,319 Speaker 3: the election. What she's doing, what Harris is doing in 197 00:09:22,320 --> 00:09:25,400 Speaker 3: the campaign, is doing, is showing the American populace, showing 198 00:09:25,440 --> 00:09:30,000 Speaker 3: these orphans that they're empathetic towards them, that they're worried 199 00:09:30,000 --> 00:09:34,320 Speaker 3: about those issues. And as I said before, part of 200 00:09:34,720 --> 00:09:37,040 Speaker 3: or in part the jump in the numbers are a 201 00:09:37,120 --> 00:09:39,920 Speaker 3: function of her reaching these constituencies. 202 00:09:40,559 --> 00:09:42,720 Speaker 2: Well, speaking of a jump in the numbers, we got 203 00:09:42,960 --> 00:09:46,480 Speaker 2: consumer confidence data today, obviously, something we watch very closely 204 00:09:46,520 --> 00:09:48,960 Speaker 2: here at Bloomberg six month high in August, in part 205 00:09:49,200 --> 00:09:52,440 Speaker 2: because of more optimism around inflation, in this idea that 206 00:09:52,480 --> 00:09:54,480 Speaker 2: interest rates could becoming lower as well. Is there a 207 00:09:54,640 --> 00:09:58,720 Speaker 2: historical relationship between where consumer confidences and the way in 208 00:09:58,760 --> 00:10:03,120 Speaker 2: which effective and Harris is part of this administration perform 209 00:10:03,320 --> 00:10:04,200 Speaker 2: in election cycles. 210 00:10:04,240 --> 00:10:06,560 Speaker 3: Yeah, there's a correlation. It's difficult to kind of line 211 00:10:06,600 --> 00:10:10,280 Speaker 3: it up as a one to one relationship. But the 212 00:10:10,320 --> 00:10:13,120 Speaker 3: more people feel optimistic, the more likely they are to 213 00:10:13,200 --> 00:10:17,000 Speaker 3: support the party in power. The more pessimistic they are, 214 00:10:17,040 --> 00:10:20,040 Speaker 3: the more likely they are to not support the party 215 00:10:20,040 --> 00:10:23,320 Speaker 3: in power to support the opposition. And this is good 216 00:10:23,360 --> 00:10:26,720 Speaker 3: for the Hairs campaign. Now, is it too little too late? 217 00:10:27,320 --> 00:10:30,480 Speaker 3: We will see, But at least directionally speaking, it's good 218 00:10:30,520 --> 00:10:34,080 Speaker 3: for the Hair aside, not as much for the Trump side. 219 00:10:34,320 --> 00:10:37,040 Speaker 2: Well, on this idea of incumbency, there was an op 220 00:10:37,160 --> 00:10:40,080 Speaker 2: ed published in the Washington Postmark This and Today that 221 00:10:40,240 --> 00:10:42,199 Speaker 2: talked about how in one hundred and eighty eight years, 222 00:10:42,200 --> 00:10:46,080 Speaker 2: we've only seen one current sitting vice president actually win 223 00:10:46,640 --> 00:10:49,080 Speaker 2: the presidency. It was George H. W. Bush, And in 224 00:10:49,160 --> 00:10:52,120 Speaker 2: this op ed, he says Bush succeeded where other modern 225 00:10:52,200 --> 00:10:55,360 Speaker 2: vice presidents failed for one simple reason. Americans wanted a 226 00:10:55,400 --> 00:10:59,080 Speaker 2: third Reagan term. Today, no one wants another Biden term, 227 00:10:59,480 --> 00:11:02,040 Speaker 2: pointing out that Ronald Reagan left office with sixty three 228 00:11:02,040 --> 00:11:05,760 Speaker 2: percent approval and Biden has fifty seven percent disapproval. The 229 00:11:05,800 --> 00:11:08,199 Speaker 2: suggestion here is if voters wanted another Biden term, he 230 00:11:08,240 --> 00:11:11,560 Speaker 2: would still be the Democratic nominee. How do you think 231 00:11:11,600 --> 00:11:13,720 Speaker 2: about that? Is there a point there? 232 00:11:13,920 --> 00:11:15,760 Speaker 3: Yeah, there is a point. I think it's a great point. 233 00:11:15,880 --> 00:11:20,000 Speaker 3: And indeed we have to juxtappose will vibes went out, 234 00:11:20,040 --> 00:11:24,319 Speaker 3: will that enthusiasm, you know, mobiliking the base, the energy 235 00:11:24,320 --> 00:11:29,400 Speaker 3: in the base, will that propel Harris forward? That's a 236 00:11:29,520 --> 00:11:33,319 Speaker 3: question mark because right now, the fundamentals, per this article, 237 00:11:33,920 --> 00:11:39,040 Speaker 3: the fundamentals are in Trump's favor, basically historically lower, almost 238 00:11:39,080 --> 00:11:44,120 Speaker 3: historically low approval ratings, the primary issue being inflation, but 239 00:11:44,200 --> 00:11:48,040 Speaker 3: Trump being stronger than Harris on inflation, and so therefore 240 00:11:48,040 --> 00:11:50,280 Speaker 3: we need to wait and see a bit. I think 241 00:11:50,280 --> 00:11:52,959 Speaker 3: the numbers are a bit overstated for Harris at this point. 242 00:11:53,000 --> 00:11:55,440 Speaker 3: I think there'll be a burnoff. I think that we 243 00:11:55,480 --> 00:11:58,240 Speaker 3: have to wait a couple of weeks, probably after Labor Day, 244 00:11:58,360 --> 00:12:01,040 Speaker 3: let's say, into the end of that week. But yes, 245 00:12:02,120 --> 00:12:04,600 Speaker 3: it really is the vibes versus the fundamentals. We would 246 00:12:04,600 --> 00:12:07,520 Speaker 3: expect the fundamentals to win out, but we don't know. 247 00:12:07,840 --> 00:12:10,000 Speaker 2: All right, fair enough, Well, I want to talk more 248 00:12:10,000 --> 00:12:12,280 Speaker 2: about Donald Trump, because he actually sat down for an 249 00:12:12,360 --> 00:12:15,720 Speaker 2: interview with doctor Phil in recent days. It's starting to 250 00:12:16,440 --> 00:12:19,400 Speaker 2: trickle out today, and he specifically talked about bases of 251 00:12:19,480 --> 00:12:21,920 Speaker 2: voters that may or may not turn out for him. 252 00:12:22,000 --> 00:12:26,960 Speaker 7: Take a listen, Christians for whatever reason, don't vote very much. 253 00:12:27,000 --> 00:12:32,920 Speaker 7: You know, proportionately NRA people and people that feel very 254 00:12:32,920 --> 00:12:36,040 Speaker 7: strongly about the Second Amendment, they're not voters. I don't 255 00:12:36,080 --> 00:12:40,360 Speaker 7: know why. Maybe it's a rebellious straight and I said 256 00:12:40,360 --> 00:12:43,959 Speaker 7: to the Christians, we got to win this election. If 257 00:12:43,960 --> 00:12:46,760 Speaker 7: we win this election, I'll straighten everything out in less 258 00:12:46,800 --> 00:12:48,080 Speaker 7: than four years by a lot. 259 00:12:49,800 --> 00:12:52,200 Speaker 2: But as we think about some of these groups, Cliff 260 00:12:52,200 --> 00:12:55,760 Speaker 2: in the way in which we've seen a messaging policy 261 00:12:55,800 --> 00:12:58,880 Speaker 2: evolution from Donald Trump when it comes to say abortion, 262 00:12:59,200 --> 00:13:02,080 Speaker 2: just in the last few days, suggesting he'd be great 263 00:13:02,080 --> 00:13:04,880 Speaker 2: for reproductive rights, JD. Van saying Donald Trump has committed 264 00:13:04,920 --> 00:13:07,600 Speaker 2: to him that he would veto a federal abortion ban. 265 00:13:07,720 --> 00:13:10,840 Speaker 2: Does he risk alienating parts of his base, like evangelical 266 00:13:10,920 --> 00:13:15,360 Speaker 2: Christians with that kind of turn on that policy Specifically. 267 00:13:14,960 --> 00:13:17,840 Speaker 3: He's really worried about turnout. He's really worried about his 268 00:13:17,880 --> 00:13:20,720 Speaker 3: base turning up. But he also is worried about the middle. 269 00:13:21,040 --> 00:13:23,240 Speaker 3: And what he's doing right now is tacking to the middle. 270 00:13:23,440 --> 00:13:28,040 Speaker 3: He's trying to be more moderate in tone. Whether that works, 271 00:13:28,080 --> 00:13:31,560 Speaker 3: that's the million dollar question. But ultimately it's all going 272 00:13:31,600 --> 00:13:32,480 Speaker 3: to be about turnout. 273 00:13:32,960 --> 00:13:35,679 Speaker 2: Well, so on this abortion issue specifically, we have seen 274 00:13:35,800 --> 00:13:39,120 Speaker 2: it be a driving turnout force for Democrats and special 275 00:13:39,120 --> 00:13:43,240 Speaker 2: elections and others. Certainly in the midterms in twenty twenty two. 276 00:13:43,520 --> 00:13:46,680 Speaker 2: Can he arrest that with this kind of policy shift 277 00:13:46,720 --> 00:13:49,280 Speaker 2: that he's seeming to try and turculate, leave it to 278 00:13:49,280 --> 00:13:52,199 Speaker 2: the states. I'm not for a federal ban. Can he 279 00:13:52,320 --> 00:13:56,120 Speaker 2: kind of stop that propellant force of women specifically being 280 00:13:56,200 --> 00:13:56,839 Speaker 2: driven to the poor. 281 00:13:57,160 --> 00:13:57,319 Speaker 1: Yeah. 282 00:13:57,880 --> 00:14:00,559 Speaker 3: Yeah, he wants to eat his cake, his cack to 283 00:14:00,640 --> 00:14:03,160 Speaker 3: excuse me, he wants to be on both sides of 284 00:14:03,200 --> 00:14:06,480 Speaker 3: the fence. Obviously he's worried about those moderate women in 285 00:14:06,559 --> 00:14:11,320 Speaker 3: suburbia that tend to be Republican. They are abortion orphans. 286 00:14:11,400 --> 00:14:15,920 Speaker 3: Let's say if the theme is is orphans ultimately, but 287 00:14:16,040 --> 00:14:17,960 Speaker 3: I would say the following it, I would say the 288 00:14:18,000 --> 00:14:24,440 Speaker 3: primary issue stills inflation. Obviously, abortion mobilizes especially the Democratic base, 289 00:14:24,720 --> 00:14:27,480 Speaker 3: and should be a worry in election of game adventures 290 00:14:27,520 --> 00:14:31,280 Speaker 3: for Trump. But it's still about inflation. We haven't heard 291 00:14:31,360 --> 00:14:34,520 Speaker 3: much from Trump talking about the economy inflation today. 292 00:14:35,040 --> 00:14:37,680 Speaker 2: Well, we know that he wins on inflation. He also 293 00:14:37,720 --> 00:14:40,000 Speaker 2: wins on the border consistently. We just have a minute 294 00:14:40,080 --> 00:14:43,960 Speaker 2: left here, Cliff. Other than abortion, what is Kamala Harris 295 00:14:44,240 --> 00:14:46,440 Speaker 2: winning on? What issues? Do voters trust her with? 296 00:14:47,120 --> 00:14:50,200 Speaker 3: Healthcare is one, but obviously it's less important today than 297 00:14:50,240 --> 00:14:53,240 Speaker 3: it was a number of years ago. The primary democratic 298 00:14:53,280 --> 00:14:55,960 Speaker 3: issue today, which is the second issue in people's minds 299 00:14:55,960 --> 00:15:00,480 Speaker 3: in Americans minds, are threats to democracy. She far out strips, 300 00:15:00,960 --> 00:15:03,840 Speaker 3: far up paces Trump on that critical issue that's been 301 00:15:03,880 --> 00:15:07,200 Speaker 3: a Biden theme, primarily a Biden theme. Obviously Harris is 302 00:15:07,280 --> 00:15:07,880 Speaker 3: using as well. 303 00:15:08,080 --> 00:15:10,640 Speaker 2: Yeah, and we heard some of that in her acceptance 304 00:15:10,640 --> 00:15:12,880 Speaker 2: speech last week, when she talked about Donald Trump as 305 00:15:12,920 --> 00:15:16,200 Speaker 2: an unserious man but described the consequences of him winning 306 00:15:16,720 --> 00:15:19,760 Speaker 2: this election as quite serious. Cliff Young of ipso's always 307 00:15:19,760 --> 00:15:21,800 Speaker 2: great to have you here in studio. Thank you so much. 308 00:15:24,920 --> 00:15:28,280 Speaker 1: You're listening to the Bloomberg Balance of Power podcast kens 309 00:15:28,440 --> 00:15:31,440 Speaker 1: just live weekdays at noon Eastern on Applecarplay and then 310 00:15:31,520 --> 00:15:34,120 Speaker 1: rod Oro with a Bloomberg Business app. You can also 311 00:15:34,200 --> 00:15:37,680 Speaker 1: listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station, 312 00:15:38,080 --> 00:15:42,120 Speaker 1: Just Say Alexa play Bloomberg eleven thirty. 313 00:15:43,120 --> 00:15:46,240 Speaker 2: We have our eye on geopolitics, not just what's happening 314 00:15:46,240 --> 00:15:49,920 Speaker 2: in the Middle East, though certainly it's consequential and worth discussion, discussion. 315 00:15:49,920 --> 00:15:51,880 Speaker 2: We will do that in just a moment, but I 316 00:15:51,880 --> 00:15:54,560 Speaker 2: also want to talk about what's taking place in China 317 00:15:54,600 --> 00:15:58,960 Speaker 2: this week. A visit from US National Security Advisor Jake 318 00:15:59,000 --> 00:16:01,320 Speaker 2: Sullivan to Beijing will who'll be meeting with the Chinese 319 00:16:01,320 --> 00:16:06,720 Speaker 2: foreign minister, potentially even with Chinese President Xijinping himself. China, 320 00:16:06,720 --> 00:16:08,240 Speaker 2: for its part, says it's going to be bringing up 321 00:16:08,280 --> 00:16:12,320 Speaker 2: issues related to Taiwan and tariffs. But the question is 322 00:16:12,320 --> 00:16:14,120 Speaker 2: ever with visits like these, is whether or not there 323 00:16:14,160 --> 00:16:18,320 Speaker 2: will be an actual tangible outcome to these kind of talks, 324 00:16:18,440 --> 00:16:21,800 Speaker 2: or if they're just talking for the sake of doing so. 325 00:16:22,000 --> 00:16:24,360 Speaker 2: Bloomberg's Ian Marlowe is here with me in our Washington, 326 00:16:24,440 --> 00:16:27,160 Speaker 2: d C. Studio now to help answer this question. He's 327 00:16:27,160 --> 00:16:31,320 Speaker 2: a senior reporter covering foreign policy for US here at Bloomberg. So, Ian, 328 00:16:31,360 --> 00:16:33,760 Speaker 2: what is the aim of this trip? Are we going 329 00:16:33,840 --> 00:16:37,160 Speaker 2: to see something firm that Sullivan will be taking away? 330 00:16:37,880 --> 00:16:40,680 Speaker 8: I assume no. I assume we're going to see much 331 00:16:40,760 --> 00:16:43,000 Speaker 8: of what we've seen over the last six months to 332 00:16:43,040 --> 00:16:48,040 Speaker 8: a year with this administration, which is sending senior delegations 333 00:16:48,080 --> 00:16:51,760 Speaker 8: over to try and to sort of maintain an acceptable 334 00:16:51,840 --> 00:16:55,880 Speaker 8: level of instability to some degree, because the US and 335 00:16:55,960 --> 00:16:59,160 Speaker 8: China do not agree across a range of fundamental issues. 336 00:17:00,000 --> 00:17:02,480 Speaker 8: The point now is to just manage those differences. And 337 00:17:02,520 --> 00:17:04,399 Speaker 8: I've been on some of these trips to China with 338 00:17:04,520 --> 00:17:07,160 Speaker 8: the Secretary of State and they're much the same. They 339 00:17:07,240 --> 00:17:09,879 Speaker 8: almost always say there's not going to be anything tangible 340 00:17:10,000 --> 00:17:12,760 Speaker 8: or concrete coming out of it, but the goal is 341 00:17:12,840 --> 00:17:16,560 Speaker 8: to keep the talks going. So I think that's to 342 00:17:16,600 --> 00:17:17,760 Speaker 8: some degree what we're seeing here. 343 00:17:18,440 --> 00:17:20,040 Speaker 2: I would be correct to say that this is the 344 00:17:20,080 --> 00:17:22,560 Speaker 2: first time we're seeing a Biden administration official make a 345 00:17:22,600 --> 00:17:25,720 Speaker 2: trip to China since Biden effectively made himself a lamb 346 00:17:25,760 --> 00:17:28,320 Speaker 2: duck president right and announced he's not seeking reelection. I 347 00:17:28,320 --> 00:17:30,639 Speaker 2: would just wonder how that might change the nature of 348 00:17:30,680 --> 00:17:33,560 Speaker 2: these conversations when it's kind of a notion we might 349 00:17:33,600 --> 00:17:35,199 Speaker 2: not be dealing with you a few months from now, 350 00:17:35,240 --> 00:17:38,000 Speaker 2: so why would we cooperate and collaborate. 351 00:17:37,760 --> 00:17:38,440 Speaker 9: At this point? 352 00:17:38,560 --> 00:17:40,800 Speaker 8: Yeah, I think so. I think there's definitely, like with 353 00:17:40,960 --> 00:17:43,239 Speaker 8: a lot of foreign policy at the moment, there's a 354 00:17:43,240 --> 00:17:46,840 Speaker 8: bit of a sort of Trump proofing idea here that 355 00:17:46,880 --> 00:17:49,760 Speaker 8: they're trying to solidify some gains to go through no 356 00:17:49,800 --> 00:17:53,800 Speaker 8: matter who wins in November. But I think there's still 357 00:17:53,880 --> 00:17:56,720 Speaker 8: always just with Jake Salvin, the National Security Advisor, I 358 00:17:56,720 --> 00:17:59,320 Speaker 8: think there's a lot of He's been doing these meetings 359 00:17:59,640 --> 00:18:03,520 Speaker 8: at a sort of regular cadence over the last few months, sorry, 360 00:18:03,520 --> 00:18:07,919 Speaker 8: the last year or so, with these senior Chinese officials, 361 00:18:07,960 --> 00:18:11,959 Speaker 8: and I think it's there is some stuff they do 362 00:18:12,040 --> 00:18:16,760 Speaker 8: want to continue pushing. There is China's economic aid to Russia, 363 00:18:17,600 --> 00:18:21,199 Speaker 8: which they worry has, you know, effectively given Russia more 364 00:18:21,200 --> 00:18:24,359 Speaker 8: of a fighting chance in Ukraine. They're still angry about that, 365 00:18:24,440 --> 00:18:27,680 Speaker 8: but they still aren't able to kind of twist China's 366 00:18:27,840 --> 00:18:30,160 Speaker 8: arm to some degree to get them to stop that aid. 367 00:18:31,240 --> 00:18:33,240 Speaker 8: That's the main thing, and then the other stuff is 368 00:18:33,560 --> 00:18:35,359 Speaker 8: really just it's sort of the laundry list of things 369 00:18:35,359 --> 00:18:38,520 Speaker 8: you see in these US China meetings, Taiwan tariffs and 370 00:18:38,560 --> 00:18:41,640 Speaker 8: other things. So I think there is still stuff to discuss. 371 00:18:42,040 --> 00:18:44,919 Speaker 8: It's just I don't think we're seeing any fundamental change 372 00:18:45,560 --> 00:18:47,240 Speaker 8: in either side's position right now. 373 00:18:47,400 --> 00:18:49,680 Speaker 2: All right, Well, that reminds me of some other talks 374 00:18:49,680 --> 00:18:51,440 Speaker 2: that are happening in which we haven't really seen many 375 00:18:51,480 --> 00:18:54,440 Speaker 2: changes in either side's position, which is the ongoing ceasefire 376 00:18:54,560 --> 00:18:58,280 Speaker 2: negotiations between Israel and Hamas and the other mediators including 377 00:18:58,800 --> 00:19:03,120 Speaker 2: the US did have success in rescuing a hostage from 378 00:19:03,160 --> 00:19:05,120 Speaker 2: Gaza today that was being held by Hamas, a fifty 379 00:19:05,160 --> 00:19:07,480 Speaker 2: two year old man, a father of eleven. There are 380 00:19:07,480 --> 00:19:12,120 Speaker 2: still one hundred more being held, either alive or otherwise ian. 381 00:19:12,720 --> 00:19:14,480 Speaker 2: What is the feeling today on the likelihood of a 382 00:19:14,480 --> 00:19:16,840 Speaker 2: deal to bring them home or are hostage? Family is 383 00:19:16,880 --> 00:19:20,000 Speaker 2: only going to get the kind of closure or their 384 00:19:20,040 --> 00:19:22,840 Speaker 2: own family members back that they need by these kind 385 00:19:22,840 --> 00:19:26,200 Speaker 2: of individual rescue operations that we know are very complicated 386 00:19:26,240 --> 00:19:27,840 Speaker 2: and have taken a lot of time to carry out. 387 00:19:28,560 --> 00:19:31,120 Speaker 8: Yeah, the US has been putting a lot of pressure 388 00:19:31,160 --> 00:19:33,680 Speaker 8: on Israel to try and bring home a deal here 389 00:19:34,280 --> 00:19:37,480 Speaker 8: there is the complicating factory that they're dealing both with 390 00:19:38,000 --> 00:19:41,920 Speaker 8: a country that has a very complicated internal political dynamic. 391 00:19:42,680 --> 00:19:46,399 Speaker 8: You know, Netnyaho has a fragile coalition, some of whom 392 00:19:46,720 --> 00:19:48,320 Speaker 8: some of the members of whom do not want a 393 00:19:48,359 --> 00:19:51,600 Speaker 8: ceasefire at all. And the other side of the table 394 00:19:51,720 --> 00:19:55,760 Speaker 8: there is a terrorist group, some of whom Israel has 395 00:19:55,880 --> 00:19:59,840 Speaker 8: assassinated over the last several months. So it's a fragile 396 00:20:00,040 --> 00:20:04,200 Speaker 8: dynamic that I believe ever since Biden kind of stepped 397 00:20:04,200 --> 00:20:08,240 Speaker 8: out and owned the ceasefire process, you know, laying out 398 00:20:08,280 --> 00:20:11,240 Speaker 8: this three stage proposal that he said Israel had agreed 399 00:20:11,280 --> 00:20:13,040 Speaker 8: to and then it was just on Hamas to agree to. 400 00:20:13,640 --> 00:20:16,480 Speaker 8: Ever since that, the US has been very positive, sort 401 00:20:16,480 --> 00:20:20,560 Speaker 8: of endlessly optimistic about the deal and the potential of 402 00:20:20,600 --> 00:20:24,000 Speaker 8: a deal. So we hear language like a bridging proposal, 403 00:20:24,119 --> 00:20:26,359 Speaker 8: or it's a final bridging proposal. We just need to 404 00:20:26,400 --> 00:20:29,120 Speaker 8: close the gaps on certain things. But really you're talking 405 00:20:29,119 --> 00:20:32,479 Speaker 8: about two sort of you know, fundamentally opposed, you know, 406 00:20:32,680 --> 00:20:35,600 Speaker 8: parties that are at war, some of whom have hostages, 407 00:20:35,640 --> 00:20:38,880 Speaker 8: the other whom's assassinating the negotiators for the other. And 408 00:20:39,600 --> 00:20:42,760 Speaker 8: I think we're still quite far. I mean, it's a 409 00:20:42,800 --> 00:20:46,960 Speaker 8: sense that there is a sense in Washington that this 410 00:20:47,040 --> 00:20:51,320 Speaker 8: deal is still not likely to come to fruition anytime soon. 411 00:20:51,400 --> 00:20:55,800 Speaker 8: And to some degree it's you know, for net Yahou, 412 00:20:56,680 --> 00:21:00,800 Speaker 8: keeping the negotiations spinning out while he's also doing military 413 00:21:00,840 --> 00:21:04,399 Speaker 8: operations is sort of to their benefit some degree. The 414 00:21:04,440 --> 00:21:08,800 Speaker 8: only pressure he feels, to some degree, faces is on 415 00:21:08,880 --> 00:21:11,679 Speaker 8: the hostages and from the hostage families within Israel. 416 00:21:11,840 --> 00:21:14,040 Speaker 2: But do you think that's also true of other Middle 417 00:21:14,080 --> 00:21:16,439 Speaker 2: East players? Largely the idea that because all of these 418 00:21:16,480 --> 00:21:19,960 Speaker 2: different actors are still either physically or otherwise at the 419 00:21:20,000 --> 00:21:24,080 Speaker 2: negotiating table that is preventing further escalation when it comes 420 00:21:24,080 --> 00:21:26,200 Speaker 2: to Israel and Hesbala, even though we did see those 421 00:21:26,240 --> 00:21:28,600 Speaker 2: preempti strikes from Israel over the weekend, or Israel and 422 00:21:28,640 --> 00:21:33,040 Speaker 2: Iran directly for that matter, how does that wider backdrop 423 00:21:33,080 --> 00:21:36,680 Speaker 2: of the other proxies and players fit into these ongoing 424 00:21:36,720 --> 00:21:38,760 Speaker 2: conversations around a ceasefire with the moss. 425 00:21:39,040 --> 00:21:41,359 Speaker 8: Yeah, I mean, I think the US believes that the 426 00:21:41,800 --> 00:21:46,359 Speaker 8: ceasefire deal and negotiations remains sort of the primary driver, 427 00:21:46,760 --> 00:21:49,440 Speaker 8: the only thing that can sort of end the sort 428 00:21:49,480 --> 00:21:52,880 Speaker 8: of endless cycle we've seen of escalation on Israel side, 429 00:21:52,960 --> 00:21:56,959 Speaker 8: escalation on Iran's side and through its proxies. So it 430 00:21:57,040 --> 00:21:59,880 Speaker 8: remains the sort of core focus. But at the same time, 431 00:22:00,000 --> 00:22:03,280 Speaker 8: there's now this sort of freezon of danger around the region, 432 00:22:03,320 --> 00:22:07,280 Speaker 8: of these of this sort of looming retaliation from Iran 433 00:22:07,359 --> 00:22:10,560 Speaker 8: that we haven't fully seen for the assassination of the 434 00:22:10,640 --> 00:22:13,960 Speaker 8: Hamas political chief in Tehran, which was quite bold obviously 435 00:22:14,040 --> 00:22:16,920 Speaker 8: and was bound to lead to something. So I think 436 00:22:16,920 --> 00:22:20,320 Speaker 8: at the moment there is still this general sense that 437 00:22:20,480 --> 00:22:23,280 Speaker 8: the region remains on edge, But to be honest, it 438 00:22:23,320 --> 00:22:27,280 Speaker 8: has remained on edge. You know for almost a year now, 439 00:22:27,359 --> 00:22:33,280 Speaker 8: since since October seventh, and both sides have managed to 440 00:22:33,400 --> 00:22:37,040 Speaker 8: calibrate their responses to the point where there isn't this 441 00:22:37,119 --> 00:22:41,159 Speaker 8: sort of like dangerous escalatory cycle that gets out of 442 00:22:41,240 --> 00:22:44,439 Speaker 8: control and then you see sort of Israel and Iran 443 00:22:44,600 --> 00:22:46,720 Speaker 8: in direct confrontation in the US getting pulled into that. 444 00:22:46,800 --> 00:22:48,919 Speaker 8: So I think that that remains a possibility, but I 445 00:22:48,920 --> 00:22:51,000 Speaker 8: think a lot of people are sort of confident that 446 00:22:51,400 --> 00:22:53,520 Speaker 8: it's been managed to some degree. 447 00:22:53,600 --> 00:22:55,399 Speaker 2: All Right, Ian, thank you so much for being here. 448 00:22:55,440 --> 00:22:58,359 Speaker 2: Ian Marlow is a senior reporter covering foreign policy for 449 00:22:58,480 --> 00:23:00,400 Speaker 2: US here at Bloomberg, and we want to ge continue 450 00:23:00,400 --> 00:23:03,760 Speaker 2: this conversation now and bring in Carmel arbit two Balance 451 00:23:03,800 --> 00:23:05,600 Speaker 2: of Power here on Bloomberg TV and radio. She is 452 00:23:05,600 --> 00:23:07,960 Speaker 2: a senior fellow for the Middle East Programs at the 453 00:23:07,960 --> 00:23:12,000 Speaker 2: Scowcroft Middle East Security Initiative at the Atlantic Council. Carmel, 454 00:23:12,040 --> 00:23:14,240 Speaker 2: welcome back. It's always good to have you. I'd like 455 00:23:14,320 --> 00:23:16,320 Speaker 2: to begin with just a point that Ian was just 456 00:23:16,359 --> 00:23:20,200 Speaker 2: making about how the US has seemed endlessly optimistic about 457 00:23:20,200 --> 00:23:23,880 Speaker 2: the prospects for a ceasefire agreement getting done. We've had 458 00:23:23,920 --> 00:23:25,679 Speaker 2: a number of head fakes. It feels like and it 459 00:23:25,680 --> 00:23:28,639 Speaker 2: never actually results in a finalized deal in which all 460 00:23:28,720 --> 00:23:32,560 Speaker 2: parties agree. So do you see that as the Biden 461 00:23:32,600 --> 00:23:38,840 Speaker 2: administration the US being disingenuous with the actual state of play, 462 00:23:39,160 --> 00:23:40,920 Speaker 2: or is it that they do feel like they keep 463 00:23:40,920 --> 00:23:43,239 Speaker 2: getting close and then the rug gets pulled out from 464 00:23:43,320 --> 00:23:45,200 Speaker 2: under them. 465 00:23:45,240 --> 00:23:47,280 Speaker 9: Thanks so much. I think it's a combination of the two. 466 00:23:47,359 --> 00:23:50,280 Speaker 9: The Biden administration has made clear that it is deeply 467 00:23:50,400 --> 00:23:53,960 Speaker 9: committed to bringing about this ceasefire, and so they're very 468 00:23:54,000 --> 00:23:57,600 Speaker 9: invested in that outcome and are bringing that optimism to 469 00:23:57,640 --> 00:24:00,480 Speaker 9: the table to try to cajole the parties along. I 470 00:24:00,520 --> 00:24:02,960 Speaker 9: think every time they think they get closer or they 471 00:24:03,000 --> 00:24:06,960 Speaker 9: find a resolution on one issue, another issue comes up. 472 00:24:07,840 --> 00:24:11,600 Speaker 9: Eventually there's going to be a cease fire, without a doubt. 473 00:24:11,600 --> 00:24:15,520 Speaker 9: The question really is one of timing. One negotiator described 474 00:24:15,680 --> 00:24:20,080 Speaker 9: the process at this moment as artificial respiration. I think 475 00:24:20,080 --> 00:24:24,479 Speaker 9: that's a little negative, but reflects how negotiators are feeling 476 00:24:24,800 --> 00:24:27,840 Speaker 9: that they're breathing and chugging along here, but that it's 477 00:24:27,920 --> 00:24:30,520 Speaker 9: not achieving the breakthrough that they had hoped for at 478 00:24:30,520 --> 00:24:32,280 Speaker 9: this stage. 479 00:24:32,600 --> 00:24:35,280 Speaker 2: So if you do operate under this assumption that eventually 480 00:24:35,359 --> 00:24:37,280 Speaker 2: there will be a cease fire. It is just a 481 00:24:37,359 --> 00:24:40,240 Speaker 2: question of when. What would your bet be on when 482 00:24:40,359 --> 00:24:43,199 Speaker 2: at this time? Kermeal, because the longer this draws on, 483 00:24:43,240 --> 00:24:45,480 Speaker 2: the closer we get to an election here in the 484 00:24:45,600 --> 00:24:47,960 Speaker 2: US and a new player potentially coming in who could 485 00:24:48,000 --> 00:24:51,719 Speaker 2: completely change the game theoretically, at least the policy position 486 00:24:51,760 --> 00:24:53,480 Speaker 2: of the US and the way in which they're trying 487 00:24:53,520 --> 00:24:56,920 Speaker 2: to exercise leverage in all of this. Is this something 488 00:24:56,920 --> 00:24:58,960 Speaker 2: that realistically can happen before November. 489 00:25:00,520 --> 00:25:03,440 Speaker 9: I think it's certainly possible for it to happen by November, 490 00:25:03,520 --> 00:25:07,440 Speaker 9: but there are significant factors that are pulling both parties 491 00:25:07,520 --> 00:25:11,240 Speaker 9: away from achieving agreement. You have, on the one hand, Natayah, 492 00:25:11,560 --> 00:25:15,280 Speaker 9: who sees the prospect of a Trump administration as a 493 00:25:15,320 --> 00:25:18,160 Speaker 9: positive outcome for him, who might want to take that 494 00:25:18,280 --> 00:25:22,359 Speaker 9: gamble as he thinks through negotiations and what types of 495 00:25:22,400 --> 00:25:25,000 Speaker 9: concessions he might have to make. On the other hand, 496 00:25:25,040 --> 00:25:27,520 Speaker 9: you have Sinoar, who sees the prospect of a regional 497 00:25:27,560 --> 00:25:30,560 Speaker 9: war is strengthening his hand. And so you have two 498 00:25:30,640 --> 00:25:35,920 Speaker 9: leaders who have really conflicting political interests, whose negotiators who 499 00:25:35,920 --> 00:25:38,040 Speaker 9: are working for them keep coming closer and closer to 500 00:25:38,119 --> 00:25:41,160 Speaker 9: an agreement. And yet the leaders themselves keep pulling back, 501 00:25:41,440 --> 00:25:43,920 Speaker 9: so I think it is certainly in the realm of possibility. 502 00:25:44,000 --> 00:25:46,879 Speaker 9: What we're hearing is that they keep getting closer. And 503 00:25:47,200 --> 00:25:50,440 Speaker 9: the two main sticking points right now are over Israel's 504 00:25:50,440 --> 00:25:53,720 Speaker 9: continued military presence in Gaza, which is key for Nata 505 00:25:53,800 --> 00:25:57,720 Speaker 9: Naho and something that Hamas and Egypt really are opposed to. 506 00:25:58,680 --> 00:26:02,000 Speaker 9: But we continue to see forward momentum on questions like 507 00:26:02,520 --> 00:26:05,800 Speaker 9: the identity and number of hostages that will be released, 508 00:26:06,680 --> 00:26:09,600 Speaker 9: or the identity and number of Palestinium prisoners that will 509 00:26:09,640 --> 00:26:13,160 Speaker 9: be released. So we see them getting very close. It's possible, 510 00:26:13,240 --> 00:26:15,720 Speaker 9: but the timeline really is a big question. 511 00:26:17,400 --> 00:26:19,560 Speaker 2: Well, and to ask you a different version of the question, 512 00:26:19,640 --> 00:26:21,800 Speaker 2: I just asked Ian, to what extent do you feel 513 00:26:21,800 --> 00:26:24,160 Speaker 2: that these conversations as close as they may be getting, 514 00:26:24,240 --> 00:26:26,480 Speaker 2: or the ebbs and flows, or what is actually preventing 515 00:26:26,560 --> 00:26:31,000 Speaker 2: the retaliation that's been expected by Iran and Hesbela for 516 00:26:31,640 --> 00:26:35,520 Speaker 2: well over a month now and reaction to the assassinations 517 00:26:35,520 --> 00:26:38,040 Speaker 2: of a Hesbela and Hamas leader back in July and 518 00:26:38,160 --> 00:26:41,639 Speaker 2: quick succession. We obviously saw Israel trying to thwart an 519 00:26:41,640 --> 00:26:44,080 Speaker 2: attempt by Hesbela. They say over this past weekend, But 520 00:26:44,119 --> 00:26:47,960 Speaker 2: I can't imagine that was really it carmeal. How does 521 00:26:48,000 --> 00:26:52,320 Speaker 2: the action of Hesbela and Iran moving forward have a 522 00:26:52,400 --> 00:26:54,840 Speaker 2: through line to what's happening with Hamas and Israel and 523 00:26:54,880 --> 00:26:56,080 Speaker 2: the mediators at the table. 524 00:26:57,240 --> 00:27:01,160 Speaker 9: Yeah, so their regional conflict has been eating up slowly 525 00:27:01,280 --> 00:27:05,280 Speaker 9: and continually. So what we saw over the weekend was 526 00:27:05,400 --> 00:27:09,560 Speaker 9: kind of a moderated escalation where there was a significant 527 00:27:09,680 --> 00:27:12,560 Speaker 9: strike by Israel but yet limited in range. It really 528 00:27:12,600 --> 00:27:16,560 Speaker 9: focused on the border areas and similarly in attack by 529 00:27:16,560 --> 00:27:19,240 Speaker 9: Hesbula that was larger than what we've seen in the past. 530 00:27:19,680 --> 00:27:22,919 Speaker 9: At the same time, we haven't seen either country push 531 00:27:23,000 --> 00:27:26,800 Speaker 9: forward into a full blown war. The US and regional 532 00:27:26,840 --> 00:27:30,000 Speaker 9: allies are really committed to keeping the temperature low to 533 00:27:30,160 --> 00:27:34,439 Speaker 9: moving forward with the ceasefire. Israel has significant constraints as 534 00:27:34,480 --> 00:27:37,040 Speaker 9: it deals with the multi front war. It is in 535 00:27:37,160 --> 00:27:39,640 Speaker 9: the interest of everyone to try to keep this quiet. 536 00:27:39,680 --> 00:27:43,479 Speaker 9: That being said, it's not going to go away. This 537 00:27:43,520 --> 00:27:45,879 Speaker 9: isn't going to just resolve itself on its own. I 538 00:27:45,920 --> 00:27:47,800 Speaker 9: think what we're going to continue to see is this 539 00:27:47,920 --> 00:27:51,840 Speaker 9: kind of wiet staging of escalation over time that we're 540 00:27:51,880 --> 00:27:55,720 Speaker 9: already in but not necessarily a full boil all at once. 541 00:27:57,400 --> 00:27:59,760 Speaker 2: Carmille, I also want to ask you about something that 542 00:28:00,280 --> 00:28:03,040 Speaker 2: the Trump campaign is paying a lot of attention to 543 00:28:03,160 --> 00:28:04,840 Speaker 2: this week, which is the third year mark of the 544 00:28:04,920 --> 00:28:08,639 Speaker 2: US withdrawal from Afghanistan yesterday, of course, marking three years 545 00:28:08,640 --> 00:28:11,760 Speaker 2: since thirteen US service members were killed in the suicide 546 00:28:11,800 --> 00:28:16,200 Speaker 2: bombing at the airport there. I asked Jennifer kavanav Defense 547 00:28:16,240 --> 00:28:18,199 Speaker 2: Priorities last night about whether or not it is a 548 00:28:18,200 --> 00:28:21,600 Speaker 2: fair characterization to describe the events we have seen take 549 00:28:21,600 --> 00:28:25,320 Speaker 2: place over the last three years, including these escalating tensions 550 00:28:25,320 --> 00:28:27,280 Speaker 2: in the Middle East, if part of the blame does 551 00:28:27,320 --> 00:28:30,159 Speaker 2: lie on that rather chaotic withdrawal from the US that 552 00:28:30,200 --> 00:28:32,480 Speaker 2: we saw back in twenty twenty one. This is what 553 00:28:32,560 --> 00:28:34,120 Speaker 2: she told me, and then I'd like your take. 554 00:28:34,720 --> 00:28:40,000 Speaker 10: Certainly, how left much to be desired in terms of 555 00:28:40,080 --> 00:28:43,880 Speaker 10: its organization and communication with allies and partners, But it 556 00:28:43,920 --> 00:28:47,880 Speaker 10: hasn't really damaged US relationships with any of its European 557 00:28:48,080 --> 00:28:51,320 Speaker 10: or Asian all alex Air partners. It didn't really have 558 00:28:51,560 --> 00:28:54,840 Speaker 10: any ramifications in the Middle East, And in terms of 559 00:28:54,880 --> 00:28:57,600 Speaker 10: the kind of broader terror threat that people have warned about, 560 00:28:58,280 --> 00:29:02,040 Speaker 10: that too hasn't really affected US national security, and in fact, 561 00:29:02,040 --> 00:29:06,080 Speaker 10: the intelligence apparatus has shown its proficiency in detecting these 562 00:29:06,080 --> 00:29:08,560 Speaker 10: attacks ahead of time. So I think it's a little 563 00:29:08,560 --> 00:29:10,280 Speaker 10: bit of a red herring. 564 00:29:12,880 --> 00:29:15,480 Speaker 2: Pil if you agree with that, and if we're assigning 565 00:29:15,480 --> 00:29:18,560 Speaker 2: blame here to what extent you believe that this was 566 00:29:18,800 --> 00:29:22,880 Speaker 2: just a Biden administration problem versus responsibility that may lie 567 00:29:22,880 --> 00:29:26,240 Speaker 2: with Donald Trump himself having agreed to the pull out 568 00:29:26,280 --> 00:29:28,000 Speaker 2: with the Taliban during his administration. 569 00:29:29,320 --> 00:29:31,800 Speaker 9: Yeah, I think there's plenty of blame to go around, 570 00:29:31,840 --> 00:29:36,520 Speaker 9: and both administrations are complicit in the withdrawal from Afghanistan 571 00:29:36,560 --> 00:29:39,600 Speaker 9: and the events that transpired afterwards. As you said, the 572 00:29:39,600 --> 00:29:43,640 Speaker 9: Trump administration had drawn down troops and committed to the 573 00:29:43,640 --> 00:29:47,560 Speaker 9: withdrawal on the timeline that Biden then executed. I think 574 00:29:47,560 --> 00:29:49,920 Speaker 9: what we're seeing right now in an election season is 575 00:29:49,920 --> 00:29:53,520 Speaker 9: that the Trump administration, excuse me, the Trump campaign sees 576 00:29:53,600 --> 00:29:56,560 Speaker 9: an opportunity here to really seize on this issue, to 577 00:29:56,680 --> 00:29:58,760 Speaker 9: point to one of the kind of gaffes of the 578 00:29:58,800 --> 00:30:03,040 Speaker 9: Biden Harris administration as a way to gain political leverage. 579 00:30:03,080 --> 00:30:05,560 Speaker 9: But there's plenty of blame to go around for both 580 00:30:05,720 --> 00:30:08,600 Speaker 9: campaigns on this issue. 581 00:30:08,840 --> 00:30:11,200 Speaker 2: But when it comes to what they are actually being 582 00:30:11,240 --> 00:30:15,040 Speaker 2: blamed for to kind of the point I was asking 583 00:30:15,120 --> 00:30:17,640 Speaker 2: Jennifer about as well. How much do you think of 584 00:30:17,680 --> 00:30:21,200 Speaker 2: the intensified conflict, the outright conflict of course between Israel 585 00:30:21,240 --> 00:30:23,800 Speaker 2: and a moss the trading a fire with other Iranian proxies, 586 00:30:23,800 --> 00:30:26,760 Speaker 2: the general higher tension in the Middle East as a 587 00:30:26,760 --> 00:30:30,880 Speaker 2: whole is because of the pullout from Afghanistan, or do 588 00:30:30,960 --> 00:30:33,640 Speaker 2: you think that these things actually are not as related 589 00:30:33,680 --> 00:30:35,000 Speaker 2: as they may be made out to be. 590 00:30:36,400 --> 00:30:39,360 Speaker 9: Yeah, I would actually really differentiate between what happened in 591 00:30:39,400 --> 00:30:41,720 Speaker 9: Afghanistan and the timing of what happened and what's going 592 00:30:41,760 --> 00:30:44,120 Speaker 9: on right now between Gaza and Israel, because what you 593 00:30:44,240 --> 00:30:48,080 Speaker 9: have are two really distinct conflicts in some largely distinct 594 00:30:48,640 --> 00:30:55,200 Speaker 9: territory regionally, where we've seen kind of the US fight 595 00:30:55,280 --> 00:30:58,800 Speaker 9: against terror and broader interests in the Middle East that 596 00:30:58,880 --> 00:31:03,280 Speaker 9: it has sought to disengage from overtime have been unsuccessful. 597 00:31:03,360 --> 00:31:06,160 Speaker 9: But that's really the extent of the through line that 598 00:31:06,240 --> 00:31:08,840 Speaker 9: I would see there. I think what you have instead 599 00:31:08,960 --> 00:31:11,800 Speaker 9: is a conflict between Israel and the Palestinians that has 600 00:31:11,840 --> 00:31:14,320 Speaker 9: been going on since the establishment of the Jewish state 601 00:31:14,360 --> 00:31:19,480 Speaker 9: that is being fueled by or run and by other 602 00:31:19,520 --> 00:31:22,640 Speaker 9: neighbors in the region. And at the same time, a 603 00:31:22,680 --> 00:31:25,960 Speaker 9: conflict that happened in Afghanistan, a war that has been 604 00:31:26,040 --> 00:31:30,160 Speaker 9: winding down, and the control of the Taliban that has 605 00:31:30,200 --> 00:31:32,720 Speaker 9: continued to subjugate the rights of people in Afghanistan. 606 00:31:34,360 --> 00:31:37,120 Speaker 2: All right, Canriel'll always appreciate your insight. Thank you so 607 00:31:37,200 --> 00:31:40,120 Speaker 2: much for joining us. That's Carmel Arbit of the Atlantic 608 00:31:40,160 --> 00:31:42,840 Speaker 2: Council joining us here on Balance of Power on Bloomberg 609 00:31:42,840 --> 00:31:45,440 Speaker 2: TV and Radio. And we still have much more ahead. 610 00:31:45,480 --> 00:31:48,640 Speaker 2: We'll reassemble our political panel next on Bloomberg. 611 00:31:52,320 --> 00:31:55,840 Speaker 1: You're listening to the Bloomberg Balance of Power podcast. Catch 612 00:31:55,920 --> 00:31:58,840 Speaker 1: Just Live weekdays at noon Eastern on Amocar Play and 613 00:31:58,840 --> 00:32:01,400 Speaker 1: then roun Otto with the blue Burn Business app. Listen 614 00:32:01,480 --> 00:32:04,520 Speaker 1: on demand wherever you get your podcasts, or watch us 615 00:32:04,560 --> 00:32:07,880 Speaker 1: live on YouTube. 616 00:32:08,240 --> 00:32:10,960 Speaker 2: I'm Kaylee lyin slam solo. Today is Joe Matthew takes 617 00:32:11,280 --> 00:32:13,400 Speaker 2: this Tuesday off. Welcome back to Balance of Power on 618 00:32:13,440 --> 00:32:15,960 Speaker 2: Bloomberg TV and Radio. And it is on this Tuesday 619 00:32:15,960 --> 00:32:19,640 Speaker 2: that a new ad is running in battleground States now 620 00:32:19,760 --> 00:32:24,040 Speaker 2: by the Harris Campaign, titled Every Day. It focuses on 621 00:32:24,120 --> 00:32:28,080 Speaker 2: the economy, specifically and includes some of the policy proposals 622 00:32:28,120 --> 00:32:31,640 Speaker 2: that Kamala Harris outlined in North Carolina earlier this month. 623 00:32:31,640 --> 00:32:35,360 Speaker 2: When it comes to price gouging and housing, here's a 624 00:32:35,360 --> 00:32:35,959 Speaker 2: little bit of it. 625 00:32:36,840 --> 00:32:40,880 Speaker 6: I will be laser focused on creating opportunities for the 626 00:32:40,920 --> 00:32:46,920 Speaker 6: middle class that advance their economic security, stability, and dignity. 627 00:32:47,160 --> 00:32:50,800 Speaker 6: If you want to know what someone cares about, look 628 00:32:50,840 --> 00:32:55,480 Speaker 6: who they fight for. I'll try fights pavillionaires and large corporations. 629 00:32:55,920 --> 00:32:58,400 Speaker 6: I will fight to give money back to working and 630 00:32:58,480 --> 00:32:59,720 Speaker 6: middle class Americans. 631 00:33:01,480 --> 00:33:04,040 Speaker 2: So she says she'll be fighting for working class, middle 632 00:33:04,040 --> 00:33:07,160 Speaker 2: class Americans. But a lot of these ideas still are 633 00:33:07,280 --> 00:33:10,760 Speaker 2: quite broad in nature. We don't have many specifics on 634 00:33:10,840 --> 00:33:13,680 Speaker 2: how exactly she does that. Granted, specifics are missing in 635 00:33:13,720 --> 00:33:17,240 Speaker 2: some of the policy platforms of the Republican ticket as well. 636 00:33:17,400 --> 00:33:19,880 Speaker 2: So let's bring in a Republican and a Democrat now 637 00:33:19,920 --> 00:33:22,920 Speaker 2: to discuss a Republican panelist today, Rick Davis, Bloomberg Politics 638 00:33:22,960 --> 00:33:26,800 Speaker 2: contributor and stone Court Capital partner, together with Democratic Strategistim 639 00:33:26,960 --> 00:33:31,960 Speaker 2: Jim Kessler, who is the executive vice president at Third Way. Rick, 640 00:33:32,160 --> 00:33:34,240 Speaker 2: I'll come to you first, as you've obviously had plenty 641 00:33:34,240 --> 00:33:37,600 Speaker 2: of experience putting campaign ads together as well. Is this 642 00:33:37,880 --> 00:33:40,600 Speaker 2: a message that is going to resonate considering the audience 643 00:33:40,600 --> 00:33:43,600 Speaker 2: where it is targeted, the battleground states that ultimately will 644 00:33:43,640 --> 00:33:47,040 Speaker 2: decide the outcome of this election or those do those voters, 645 00:33:47,040 --> 00:33:50,120 Speaker 2: the ones who could swing either way, those just thousands 646 00:33:50,160 --> 00:33:53,360 Speaker 2: realistically we're talking about niche of those states needs something 647 00:33:53,400 --> 00:33:54,080 Speaker 2: more specific. 648 00:33:56,000 --> 00:33:58,080 Speaker 4: That's a good question, Kaylee. I think that one of 649 00:33:58,120 --> 00:34:00,880 Speaker 4: the things that this represents is the big pivot away 650 00:34:00,920 --> 00:34:04,200 Speaker 4: from the national campaign that Kamala Harris has been running, 651 00:34:04,560 --> 00:34:07,880 Speaker 4: the big convention consolidation of power within the Democratic Party, 652 00:34:08,640 --> 00:34:12,480 Speaker 4: and really finally targeting even more so the suburbs in 653 00:34:12,719 --> 00:34:17,080 Speaker 4: key cities around these targeted six states, seven states, you know, 654 00:34:17,120 --> 00:34:21,920 Speaker 4: places like Pittsburgh suburbs, Philadelphia suburbs, Maricopa County, Arizona. And 655 00:34:21,960 --> 00:34:23,719 Speaker 4: they are talking to an issue that a lot of 656 00:34:23,800 --> 00:34:27,120 Speaker 4: voters have concerns about it, especially those voters that might 657 00:34:27,320 --> 00:34:31,080 Speaker 4: be willing to vote Democrat, who maybe are independent or 658 00:34:31,160 --> 00:34:33,960 Speaker 4: unaligned voters. And that is on housing, and that is 659 00:34:34,520 --> 00:34:37,000 Speaker 4: probably one of the areas where she's actually presented the 660 00:34:37,040 --> 00:34:43,319 Speaker 4: most specific kind of proposals that she's talked about. Two 661 00:34:43,360 --> 00:34:47,319 Speaker 4: Thursdays ago during her announcement of her economic plan, and 662 00:34:47,360 --> 00:34:50,000 Speaker 4: so this might be the one area where she's got 663 00:34:50,000 --> 00:34:52,920 Speaker 4: a little teeth to bear, and I think that that 664 00:34:53,000 --> 00:34:56,000 Speaker 4: gives her substance. It gives her something that sounds like 665 00:34:56,040 --> 00:34:59,240 Speaker 4: she's got well thought out proposals that don't really sound 666 00:34:59,280 --> 00:35:03,320 Speaker 4: too cradic in nature. And so I think she's trying 667 00:35:03,320 --> 00:35:05,360 Speaker 4: to do a lot of things at one time. But 668 00:35:05,400 --> 00:35:08,760 Speaker 4: you're right, they are chasing tens of thousands of votes 669 00:35:08,840 --> 00:35:11,919 Speaker 4: in these key locations, and this is where the rest 670 00:35:11,960 --> 00:35:15,080 Speaker 4: of the campaign is going to be seen, not by 671 00:35:15,120 --> 00:35:18,279 Speaker 4: the rest of the country, but by these suburban locations 672 00:35:18,440 --> 00:35:22,520 Speaker 4: around these major cities in the key swing states. 673 00:35:23,800 --> 00:35:23,920 Speaker 9: Well. 674 00:35:23,960 --> 00:35:25,919 Speaker 2: And it is worth pointing out in these key swing 675 00:35:25,960 --> 00:35:28,719 Speaker 2: states that Donald Trump and Jade Vance are spending a 676 00:35:28,719 --> 00:35:30,640 Speaker 2: great deal of time in them this week. In fact, 677 00:35:30,800 --> 00:35:33,000 Speaker 2: Jade Vance is speaking in Michigan right now, also on 678 00:35:33,040 --> 00:35:36,560 Speaker 2: the subject of the economy. But Jim, before we heed 679 00:35:36,600 --> 00:35:39,080 Speaker 2: back to what the Republicans are proposing and think more 680 00:35:39,120 --> 00:35:41,319 Speaker 2: about Harris and the language we just heard her use 681 00:35:41,360 --> 00:35:45,200 Speaker 2: in this ad talking about being for the middle class, 682 00:35:45,280 --> 00:35:48,520 Speaker 2: it does sound pretty similar to the message we've gotten 683 00:35:48,560 --> 00:35:51,239 Speaker 2: from the president she has served with over the last 684 00:35:51,320 --> 00:35:53,279 Speaker 2: three and a half years. Joe Biden, how often have 685 00:35:53,360 --> 00:35:56,239 Speaker 2: we heard him say the middle class built America and 686 00:35:56,360 --> 00:35:58,640 Speaker 2: unions built the middle class. Kamala Harris trying to paint 687 00:35:58,640 --> 00:36:01,759 Speaker 2: herself as union friendly as well. Is she creating enough 688 00:36:01,800 --> 00:36:04,799 Speaker 2: distance separation between the economy she would like to create 689 00:36:04,800 --> 00:36:06,839 Speaker 2: in the policy proposals she would like to use to 690 00:36:06,840 --> 00:36:09,960 Speaker 2: do it versus the one Joe Biden has created, knowing 691 00:36:09,960 --> 00:36:12,440 Speaker 2: that he didn't very well get good marks on that 692 00:36:12,480 --> 00:36:14,040 Speaker 2: while he was still in this race. 693 00:36:16,120 --> 00:36:19,360 Speaker 11: I think there's some cheap differences between the way Harris 694 00:36:19,480 --> 00:36:23,920 Speaker 11: talks about the economy and Biden. One is it just 695 00:36:23,960 --> 00:36:26,680 Speaker 11: feels a lot more modern when Harris is talking about 696 00:36:26,680 --> 00:36:29,080 Speaker 11: it and Biden's going back to you know what his 697 00:36:29,160 --> 00:36:30,840 Speaker 11: dad used to tell him when you know, in the 698 00:36:30,920 --> 00:36:34,440 Speaker 11: nineteen forties and nineteen fifties, Like I just felt very nostalgic. 699 00:36:35,040 --> 00:36:41,920 Speaker 11: I am struck by how Harris's language and proposals are 700 00:36:42,120 --> 00:36:48,800 Speaker 11: very centrist Democratic with a populist chaser there. So opportunity, economy, 701 00:36:48,800 --> 00:36:53,279 Speaker 11: those were not Biden words. Those are Harris words. You know, 702 00:36:53,320 --> 00:36:55,880 Speaker 11: security and stability for the middle class. Again, there's a 703 00:36:56,120 --> 00:36:59,719 Speaker 11: Harris words. There's aren't Biden words. And you know, in 704 00:36:59,840 --> 00:37:03,800 Speaker 11: terms of policy specifics, if you go back to twenty sixteen, 705 00:37:04,200 --> 00:37:06,920 Speaker 11: Hillary Clinton had two hundred and sixty four policy ideas 706 00:37:06,960 --> 00:37:10,959 Speaker 11: on a website, everything from Alzheimer's to Zeka. Donald Trump 707 00:37:11,040 --> 00:37:14,960 Speaker 11: had seven. So you know, this is not a quantity 708 00:37:15,040 --> 00:37:18,000 Speaker 11: game out there. It's really about quality. 709 00:37:20,080 --> 00:37:23,120 Speaker 2: Well, okay, if it's not about quantity but quality, what 710 00:37:23,200 --> 00:37:26,000 Speaker 2: about the quality of ideas that actually are the same 711 00:37:26,080 --> 00:37:28,840 Speaker 2: that both candidates seem to be agreeing with, Like, for example, 712 00:37:28,920 --> 00:37:32,359 Speaker 2: Jim no tax on tips. It was Donald Trump's idea 713 00:37:32,440 --> 00:37:37,400 Speaker 2: first before it became Kamala Harris's. What distinction will voters 714 00:37:37,440 --> 00:37:40,200 Speaker 2: actually make in that regard if both candidates are saying 715 00:37:40,719 --> 00:37:42,120 Speaker 2: similar populist. 716 00:37:41,680 --> 00:37:45,200 Speaker 11: Things, right, And I just want to be clear, I 717 00:37:45,200 --> 00:37:49,400 Speaker 11: don't love that idea from either candidate. Okay, this is 718 00:37:49,400 --> 00:37:53,160 Speaker 11: what Rick Davis was talking about. This is Nevada. You 719 00:37:53,160 --> 00:37:55,880 Speaker 11: know in some other places, but Nevada is very tip 720 00:37:55,960 --> 00:38:00,000 Speaker 11: centric state. Okay, So it's like, how are you getting 721 00:38:00,120 --> 00:38:02,680 Speaker 11: some younger voters, how are you getting service workers who 722 00:38:03,000 --> 00:38:08,000 Speaker 11: are who are relying on tips that are swing voters, 723 00:38:08,080 --> 00:38:12,239 Speaker 11: low propensity voters, and low information voters. So I do 724 00:38:12,320 --> 00:38:15,120 Speaker 11: think some of these ideas are like a direct play 725 00:38:15,200 --> 00:38:19,040 Speaker 11: for voters, and others are more broad economic ideas. 726 00:38:20,160 --> 00:38:20,319 Speaker 9: Well. 727 00:38:20,360 --> 00:38:22,319 Speaker 2: Novada of course one of the sun Belt states that 728 00:38:22,360 --> 00:38:24,440 Speaker 2: it does seem if polling is to be believed, Harris 729 00:38:24,440 --> 00:38:27,759 Speaker 2: stands a better chance than Joe Biden did of carrying them. 730 00:38:27,840 --> 00:38:30,319 Speaker 2: He was very focused on the rest Belt and it 731 00:38:30,360 --> 00:38:32,840 Speaker 2: is another sun Belt state. Rick. We will see Harris 732 00:38:32,840 --> 00:38:36,400 Speaker 2: and Walls spending a few days this week, beginning tomorrow, 733 00:38:36,520 --> 00:38:40,080 Speaker 2: a bus tour in Georgia that will run through Thursday. 734 00:38:40,239 --> 00:38:43,799 Speaker 2: What is the messaging that would actually put them over 735 00:38:43,840 --> 00:38:45,640 Speaker 2: the finish line in a state that, according to the 736 00:38:45,680 --> 00:38:48,520 Speaker 2: New York Times Sienna latest poll, Trump is up by 737 00:38:48,520 --> 00:38:51,319 Speaker 2: four It is within the margin of error. He does 738 00:38:51,400 --> 00:38:53,440 Speaker 2: have a little bit of beef if you will with 739 00:38:53,680 --> 00:38:57,640 Speaker 2: Governor Brian Kemp. How in play is Georgia really for Harris? 740 00:38:57,719 --> 00:39:00,239 Speaker 2: What would it take for her to win? It is 741 00:39:00,239 --> 00:39:03,000 Speaker 2: this economic messaging and she's going to. 742 00:39:03,000 --> 00:39:05,720 Speaker 4: Have to replicate some of the magic that Joe Biden 743 00:39:05,800 --> 00:39:09,640 Speaker 4: put onto the state in twenty twenty. It's not a 744 00:39:09,800 --> 00:39:13,200 Speaker 4: dissimilar election, not a dissimilar electorate. She has to sow 745 00:39:13,280 --> 00:39:19,279 Speaker 4: discontent with Republican voters. Obviously mentioned Donald Trump has a 746 00:39:19,680 --> 00:39:23,160 Speaker 4: love hate relationship with the GOP in Georgia, and so 747 00:39:23,200 --> 00:39:24,480 Speaker 4: she's going to have to do what she can to 748 00:39:24,520 --> 00:39:28,400 Speaker 4: suppress that vote, keep Republicans thinking maybe Trump's not the 749 00:39:28,440 --> 00:39:31,600 Speaker 4: guy for them, and then at the same time do 750 00:39:31,719 --> 00:39:34,160 Speaker 4: everything she can to boost her base, because the reality 751 00:39:34,239 --> 00:39:36,400 Speaker 4: is this is going to be a base election in Georgia. 752 00:39:36,400 --> 00:39:39,760 Speaker 4: More so than tipping the balance with some suburban voters 753 00:39:39,800 --> 00:39:44,280 Speaker 4: around Atlanta. She's going to need a bigger, bigger turnout, 754 00:39:44,719 --> 00:39:47,800 Speaker 4: especially amongst African American voters that have really supplied the 755 00:39:47,840 --> 00:39:50,560 Speaker 4: wins in the past when they've had them for Democratic 756 00:39:50,560 --> 00:39:51,560 Speaker 4: Canada statewide. 757 00:39:53,320 --> 00:39:56,719 Speaker 2: Well, So, when we consider what plays to the base, Jim, 758 00:39:56,719 --> 00:39:58,759 Speaker 2: it does bring us to the abortion issue, something that 759 00:39:58,800 --> 00:40:01,319 Speaker 2: we have seen does drive turnout, at least it did 760 00:40:01,320 --> 00:40:03,520 Speaker 2: in twenty twenty two, it has in special elections in 761 00:40:03,560 --> 00:40:06,200 Speaker 2: the states in which the abortion question has been on 762 00:40:06,560 --> 00:40:08,640 Speaker 2: the ballot. It also seems to be one that Donald 763 00:40:08,680 --> 00:40:12,280 Speaker 2: Trump is trying to get more moderates in his corner 764 00:40:12,320 --> 00:40:15,520 Speaker 2: on as well, with this kind of characterizing himself now 765 00:40:15,520 --> 00:40:18,239 Speaker 2: as someone who will be great for women's and reproductive rates. 766 00:40:18,280 --> 00:40:20,560 Speaker 2: Jade Van's saying that Donald Trump has committed to him 767 00:40:20,880 --> 00:40:24,319 Speaker 2: that he would veto a federal abortion band. Do you 768 00:40:24,320 --> 00:40:27,680 Speaker 2: think these voters who may actually vote on this issue, 769 00:40:27,760 --> 00:40:29,760 Speaker 2: a group of them who are driven to the polls 770 00:40:30,080 --> 00:40:31,839 Speaker 2: on this issue, will buy into that at all. 771 00:40:33,800 --> 00:40:35,920 Speaker 11: If you're driven by this issue, you are not going 772 00:40:36,000 --> 00:40:39,959 Speaker 11: to buy into the change of position essentially of JD. 773 00:40:40,080 --> 00:40:43,560 Speaker 11: Vans and Donald Trump. If you go back in time 774 00:40:43,680 --> 00:40:48,600 Speaker 11: six weeks, there were two issues bedeviling each campaign. For 775 00:40:49,280 --> 00:40:52,280 Speaker 11: the Biden campaign it was age and for the Trump 776 00:40:52,400 --> 00:40:56,439 Speaker 11: campaign it was the Dobbs decision and abortion. Harris has 777 00:40:56,520 --> 00:41:01,759 Speaker 11: solved the age issue, Republicans have not solved the abortion issue, 778 00:41:01,920 --> 00:41:07,120 Speaker 11: and Democrats have generally overperformed the polls and expectations in 779 00:41:07,239 --> 00:41:12,319 Speaker 11: every election since Dobs a few exceptions, but in almost everyone. 780 00:41:12,600 --> 00:41:15,520 Speaker 11: So I think Republicans have a right to be afraid. 781 00:41:17,760 --> 00:41:20,200 Speaker 2: Okay, well, Rick is the Republican I'd love for you 782 00:41:20,239 --> 00:41:21,759 Speaker 2: to weigh in on that, because we have been talking 783 00:41:21,840 --> 00:41:25,160 Speaker 2: about this issue being something that very much does dog 784 00:41:25,440 --> 00:41:27,480 Speaker 2: the party in that it's very hard for them to 785 00:41:27,600 --> 00:41:30,479 Speaker 2: find a clear messaging line on this that seems to work, 786 00:41:30,520 --> 00:41:32,600 Speaker 2: seems to stick. Do you think this one will this 787 00:41:32,760 --> 00:41:36,160 Speaker 2: leave it to the states. No, federal van is something 788 00:41:36,200 --> 00:41:39,200 Speaker 2: that Republicans can actually win on, not just Trump advance 789 00:41:39,280 --> 00:41:41,920 Speaker 2: but others as well. 790 00:41:42,160 --> 00:41:44,200 Speaker 4: Yeah, I think this is an effort not to win 791 00:41:44,280 --> 00:41:47,120 Speaker 4: on it, but just to keep the pain down to 792 00:41:47,200 --> 00:41:50,480 Speaker 4: a short threshold for Republican candidates. And so, you know, 793 00:41:50,560 --> 00:41:52,719 Speaker 4: but like they have a few things going against some 794 00:41:52,760 --> 00:41:55,839 Speaker 4: One is they got a referendum in Arizona that's going 795 00:41:55,880 --> 00:41:59,480 Speaker 4: to turn out voters on the choice issue, and so 796 00:41:59,480 --> 00:42:01,359 Speaker 4: they're going to be fighting a two front war there. 797 00:42:01,719 --> 00:42:03,520 Speaker 4: The other thing I would remind everybody is there were 798 00:42:03,520 --> 00:42:07,800 Speaker 4: a lot of Democrats who took advantage of the decision 799 00:42:07,840 --> 00:42:11,080 Speaker 4: on the DOBS to generate wins in a lot of states. 800 00:42:11,280 --> 00:42:13,200 Speaker 4: But some of those wins came because they have a 801 00:42:13,280 --> 00:42:17,319 Speaker 4: higher propensity voters than Republicans have in the off years, 802 00:42:17,400 --> 00:42:20,400 Speaker 4: especially they show up. And so this is an election 803 00:42:20,480 --> 00:42:22,520 Speaker 4: where I think you have to assume everybody's going to 804 00:42:22,520 --> 00:42:25,200 Speaker 4: show up, and so that advantage tends to get neutralized 805 00:42:25,200 --> 00:42:27,880 Speaker 4: a little bit, and so it tends to mask the 806 00:42:28,200 --> 00:42:30,920 Speaker 4: victories that a lot of pro choice voters have been 807 00:42:30,960 --> 00:42:34,160 Speaker 4: claiming for the last four years. But they should be 808 00:42:34,280 --> 00:42:37,840 Speaker 4: cautious because those victories may not show up on election 809 00:42:38,000 --> 00:42:41,080 Speaker 4: day in twenty twenty four, just because everybody else. 810 00:42:41,040 --> 00:42:45,480 Speaker 2: Is all right, fair enough, Jim, in our final minute 811 00:42:45,480 --> 00:42:48,040 Speaker 2: with you, just on this notion of voters potentially being 812 00:42:48,120 --> 00:42:51,279 Speaker 2: turned to the polls, especially in states where abortion is 813 00:42:51,280 --> 00:42:53,640 Speaker 2: on the ballot, like Arizona or even Florida, does it 814 00:42:53,680 --> 00:42:56,440 Speaker 2: make you reconsider as well, who can win the congressional 815 00:42:56,520 --> 00:43:01,000 Speaker 2: races in those states. What Democrats' odds maybe, say, flipping 816 00:43:01,760 --> 00:43:04,120 Speaker 2: Senator Scott's seat in Florida blue. 817 00:43:06,840 --> 00:43:10,480 Speaker 11: So that could happen if there's a wave. Certainly right 818 00:43:10,520 --> 00:43:13,440 Speaker 11: now there there doesn't appear to be a blue wave, 819 00:43:13,880 --> 00:43:16,920 Speaker 11: although the odds of a blue wave are certainly greater 820 00:43:17,040 --> 00:43:21,319 Speaker 11: than it was five weeks ago. If you talk to 821 00:43:22,200 --> 00:43:27,239 Speaker 11: Democrat congressional democrats, they are far more optimistic about their 822 00:43:27,360 --> 00:43:32,120 Speaker 11: chances to win battleground states and pick up, you know, 823 00:43:32,280 --> 00:43:35,919 Speaker 11: some tough races than they were five or six weeks ago. 824 00:43:36,080 --> 00:43:40,440 Speaker 11: So the optimism is there, the money's there. It feels 825 00:43:40,440 --> 00:43:46,640 Speaker 11: like there's some momentum. Florida's tough. Texas is tough, not impossible. 826 00:43:47,719 --> 00:43:51,160 Speaker 2: All right, Jim Kessler and Rick Davis our political panel today, 827 00:43:51,160 --> 00:43:53,920 Speaker 2: Thank you both so much for joining me. Appreciate your 828 00:43:53,920 --> 00:43:56,080 Speaker 2: time and we're going to continue this conversation on the 829 00:43:56,120 --> 00:43:59,120 Speaker 2: down ballot races to watch what the actual composition of 830 00:43:59,200 --> 00:44:02,320 Speaker 2: Congress could look like after November. Is that is just 831 00:44:02,360 --> 00:44:04,440 Speaker 2: as important potentially as who's going to be president in 832 00:44:04,520 --> 00:44:07,600 Speaker 2: terms of the actual policy making we've been discussing. Aaron 833 00:44:07,640 --> 00:44:10,880 Speaker 2: Covey of the Cook Political Report, who focuses on congressional races, 834 00:44:10,880 --> 00:44:13,120 Speaker 2: will be with me next here on Balance of Power. 835 00:44:13,200 --> 00:44:18,480 Speaker 2: So stick with us on Bloomberg TV and radio. 836 00:44:19,160 --> 00:44:22,560 Speaker 1: You're listening to the Bloomberg Balance of Power podcast kens 837 00:44:22,640 --> 00:44:25,680 Speaker 1: just live weekdays at noon Eastern on Applecarplay and then 838 00:44:25,760 --> 00:44:28,360 Speaker 1: Roud Otto with the Bloomberg Business App. You can also 839 00:44:28,440 --> 00:44:31,919 Speaker 1: listen live on Amazon Alexa from our flagship New York station, 840 00:44:32,320 --> 00:44:34,920 Speaker 1: Just Say Alexa Play Bloomberg eleven. 841 00:44:34,719 --> 00:44:40,400 Speaker 2: Thirty Minding everyone, I am counting seventy days until the election. 842 00:44:40,520 --> 00:44:43,000 Speaker 2: Ten weeks from today is when voters will head to 843 00:44:43,080 --> 00:44:45,160 Speaker 2: the polls. And while we spend a lot of our 844 00:44:45,160 --> 00:44:49,440 Speaker 2: time and energy talking about potential voter selection for president 845 00:44:49,440 --> 00:44:51,759 Speaker 2: between Donald Trump and Kamala Harris, it is worth noting 846 00:44:51,800 --> 00:44:55,080 Speaker 2: that depending on the state where they live, they will 847 00:44:55,080 --> 00:44:58,720 Speaker 2: have a number of congressional candidates to consider. As well 848 00:44:58,920 --> 00:45:00,600 Speaker 2: as they go to cast their vote, whether or not 849 00:45:00,680 --> 00:45:03,719 Speaker 2: they'll be splitting their ballots, voting R or D all 850 00:45:03,760 --> 00:45:06,360 Speaker 2: the way down. It is the composition of Congress we 851 00:45:06,440 --> 00:45:08,760 Speaker 2: have to consider as well, because whoever is elected president 852 00:45:09,239 --> 00:45:11,759 Speaker 2: will only have so much ability to accomplish their own 853 00:45:11,800 --> 00:45:15,279 Speaker 2: agenda if they don't have congressional support. And that is 854 00:45:15,320 --> 00:45:17,759 Speaker 2: where we go now to Aaron Covey, who is from 855 00:45:17,800 --> 00:45:20,040 Speaker 2: the Cook Political Report for she's an editor and she 856 00:45:20,120 --> 00:45:23,880 Speaker 2: does focus specifically on congressional races. Erin Welcome back to 857 00:45:23,920 --> 00:45:26,239 Speaker 2: Bloomberg TV and Radio. Always great to have you here. 858 00:45:26,640 --> 00:45:28,880 Speaker 2: On balance of power. Just a few minutes ago, I 859 00:45:28,920 --> 00:45:31,600 Speaker 2: was speaking with Jim Kessler of Third Way, who said 860 00:45:31,600 --> 00:45:34,560 Speaker 2: that the chances of a sweep for Democrats are higher 861 00:45:34,600 --> 00:45:37,880 Speaker 2: today than they were five weeks ago when Joe Biden 862 00:45:37,960 --> 00:45:40,560 Speaker 2: was still in the race. But higher is one thing. 863 00:45:41,600 --> 00:45:44,160 Speaker 2: Higher to the point that it actually seems likely is 864 00:45:44,400 --> 00:45:48,279 Speaker 2: entirely another. How have the last five weeks, in the 865 00:45:48,320 --> 00:45:50,880 Speaker 2: sudden energy and exuberance that has come along with the 866 00:45:50,920 --> 00:45:54,560 Speaker 2: Kamala Harris presidential campaign, changed your own calculus about the 867 00:45:54,560 --> 00:45:57,319 Speaker 2: way in which the balance of power in Congress is 868 00:45:57,480 --> 00:45:59,680 Speaker 2: likely to switch up? 869 00:46:00,000 --> 00:46:00,480 Speaker 4: November. 870 00:46:02,440 --> 00:46:04,759 Speaker 12: Hi, Kaylee, Well thanks for having me on. Yeah, so 871 00:46:04,880 --> 00:46:08,319 Speaker 12: Harris's entrance into the race has reset it not just 872 00:46:08,360 --> 00:46:10,799 Speaker 12: for the presidential race, as you mentioned, but for the 873 00:46:10,840 --> 00:46:13,399 Speaker 12: down ballot races as well, and I think it has 874 00:46:13,520 --> 00:46:17,280 Speaker 12: had a much larger effect on the battle for control 875 00:46:17,320 --> 00:46:21,160 Speaker 12: of the House, where Republicans only have a four seat majority, 876 00:46:21,239 --> 00:46:24,399 Speaker 12: and so all cycle, I think the House has kind 877 00:46:24,400 --> 00:46:27,680 Speaker 12: of looked like the best area for Democrats to succeed 878 00:46:27,800 --> 00:46:31,720 Speaker 12: in compared to the presidential race, where Biden was trailing 879 00:46:31,800 --> 00:46:33,759 Speaker 12: Trump for most of the cycle at the top of 880 00:46:33,760 --> 00:46:37,240 Speaker 12: the ticket, and the Senate, which is where the map 881 00:46:37,320 --> 00:46:41,080 Speaker 12: currently is very good for Republicans this cycle, and so 882 00:46:41,320 --> 00:46:43,239 Speaker 12: even now, I think with Harris at the top of 883 00:46:43,280 --> 00:46:47,440 Speaker 12: the ticket, Democrats would need to hold seats in Montana 884 00:46:47,520 --> 00:46:50,040 Speaker 12: and Ohio, which are states that Trump is still very 885 00:46:50,120 --> 00:46:53,839 Speaker 12: likely to win by single or double digits this year, 886 00:46:53,880 --> 00:46:57,799 Speaker 12: and so the Senate I think remains difficult for Democrats 887 00:46:57,840 --> 00:47:00,040 Speaker 12: for that reason, just because of the map, but the 888 00:47:00,120 --> 00:47:02,759 Speaker 12: House is a lot more feasible at this point. You know, 889 00:47:02,840 --> 00:47:06,920 Speaker 12: I saw him polling even before Biden's disastrous debate performance. 890 00:47:07,320 --> 00:47:10,920 Speaker 12: He was a huge anchor on House Democrats, and you know, 891 00:47:11,000 --> 00:47:13,640 Speaker 12: these a lot of these House candidates were overperforming Biden 892 00:47:13,680 --> 00:47:17,840 Speaker 12: pretty significantly, but it's very difficult at the end of 893 00:47:17,840 --> 00:47:21,000 Speaker 12: a day for a House candidate to separate themselves from 894 00:47:21,160 --> 00:47:23,080 Speaker 12: the top of the ticket, as they're so tied to 895 00:47:23,120 --> 00:47:26,600 Speaker 12: the national environment. You know, twenty twenty, we only saw 896 00:47:26,680 --> 00:47:29,640 Speaker 12: sixteen congressional districts that voted one way for president and 897 00:47:29,680 --> 00:47:33,520 Speaker 12: the other way for Congress, and so Biden could have 898 00:47:33,640 --> 00:47:37,080 Speaker 12: made it incredibly difficult for Democrats to take control of 899 00:47:37,080 --> 00:47:39,240 Speaker 12: the House. Now, with Harris at the top of the ticket, 900 00:47:39,239 --> 00:47:42,239 Speaker 12: they're in a much stronger position, and you know, we 901 00:47:42,360 --> 00:47:45,880 Speaker 12: still see control of the House to be close. You know, 902 00:47:45,960 --> 00:47:47,400 Speaker 12: I think if you look at the races in our 903 00:47:47,520 --> 00:47:50,759 Speaker 12: toss up column, you'll see that neither party has a 904 00:47:50,760 --> 00:47:52,560 Speaker 12: clear edge, and it looks like it's going to come 905 00:47:52,600 --> 00:47:54,680 Speaker 12: down to the two dozen or so races that we 906 00:47:54,719 --> 00:47:58,359 Speaker 12: consider pure toss ups. But Democrats now have a much 907 00:47:58,400 --> 00:48:02,320 Speaker 12: better shot at winning those toss races and gaining a majority. 908 00:48:03,840 --> 00:48:06,160 Speaker 2: Well, and let's talk about where those tass up braces 909 00:48:06,200 --> 00:48:08,359 Speaker 2: are actually concentrated, because we know a lot of them 910 00:48:08,400 --> 00:48:10,920 Speaker 2: are in states like New York, for example, which is 911 00:48:10,960 --> 00:48:14,200 Speaker 2: a safely blue state. When it comes to the presidential election, 912 00:48:14,320 --> 00:48:16,200 Speaker 2: but not so when it comes to the many different 913 00:48:16,239 --> 00:48:18,759 Speaker 2: districts that are in the Empire state. So how should 914 00:48:18,800 --> 00:48:20,640 Speaker 2: we be thinking about that kind of dynamic era, and 915 00:48:20,719 --> 00:48:23,920 Speaker 2: knowing that the presidential candidates themselves are focusing a lot 916 00:48:23,920 --> 00:48:27,880 Speaker 2: of their time, energy, and frankly resources into the swing 917 00:48:27,920 --> 00:48:31,000 Speaker 2: states that will decide the electoral college, We're not necessarily 918 00:48:31,040 --> 00:48:34,359 Speaker 2: going to see Paris or Trump frequently visiting New York, right, 919 00:48:34,400 --> 00:48:36,640 Speaker 2: And how does that affect the candidates that are running there? 920 00:48:38,080 --> 00:48:40,920 Speaker 12: Yeah, so you're right, Kaylee. It's an interesting dynamic. The 921 00:48:41,000 --> 00:48:43,719 Speaker 12: reason that you have a lot of competitive races and 922 00:48:43,800 --> 00:48:48,760 Speaker 12: states like New York, California, Oregon, New Mexico is because 923 00:48:48,800 --> 00:48:51,879 Speaker 12: of the fact that Republicans did pretty well in these 924 00:48:51,920 --> 00:48:55,440 Speaker 12: states here in the midterm cycle. Whereas Democrats did surprisingly 925 00:48:55,480 --> 00:48:57,719 Speaker 12: well in a lot of the swing states like Michigan 926 00:48:58,120 --> 00:49:01,600 Speaker 12: and Pennsylvania, Republicans made pretty significant gains in states like 927 00:49:01,640 --> 00:49:05,080 Speaker 12: California and New York. And so because of that, now 928 00:49:05,120 --> 00:49:08,600 Speaker 12: Republicans have several vulnerable incumbents who are in these states, 929 00:49:08,880 --> 00:49:11,400 Speaker 12: and because of the fact that you don't have the 930 00:49:11,440 --> 00:49:16,319 Speaker 12: presidential candidates fighting the battlegrounds on that territory. I think 931 00:49:16,360 --> 00:49:19,440 Speaker 12: that Republican incumbents are in a slightly better position to 932 00:49:19,520 --> 00:49:22,920 Speaker 12: separate themselves from the top of the tickets in some ways. 933 00:49:23,040 --> 00:49:25,120 Speaker 12: But at the end of the day, all of these 934 00:49:25,200 --> 00:49:28,600 Speaker 12: races have become so nationalized. I think it's going to 935 00:49:28,600 --> 00:49:32,920 Speaker 12: be difficult, whether you're a Republican member in California or 936 00:49:33,000 --> 00:49:36,800 Speaker 12: Republican member in Michigan, to distance yourselves from the national dynamics. 937 00:49:36,800 --> 00:49:39,319 Speaker 12: They'll certainly try to do so. And then on the 938 00:49:39,360 --> 00:49:42,439 Speaker 12: other hand, most of the Democratic incumbents who are most 939 00:49:42,480 --> 00:49:45,920 Speaker 12: vulnerable are actually in some of the more competitive states. 940 00:49:45,960 --> 00:49:50,359 Speaker 12: So that includes Pennsylvania, Michigan, Arizona, North Carolina. These are 941 00:49:50,400 --> 00:49:54,000 Speaker 12: the states that have the most competitive districts that Democrats 942 00:49:54,000 --> 00:49:58,279 Speaker 12: currently hold, and so you know, it's a weird geographic 943 00:49:58,719 --> 00:50:02,280 Speaker 12: divide here. I think that it could have a marginal 944 00:50:02,360 --> 00:50:05,279 Speaker 12: impact maybe on Republicans' ability to hold the House, which 945 00:50:05,280 --> 00:50:07,960 Speaker 12: couldn't matter if control of the House is decided on 946 00:50:08,000 --> 00:50:10,480 Speaker 12: the margins, which we think it will be. But I 947 00:50:10,520 --> 00:50:12,640 Speaker 12: do think at the end of the day, it is 948 00:50:12,840 --> 00:50:15,840 Speaker 12: very difficult as a member of the House and certainly 949 00:50:15,920 --> 00:50:19,320 Speaker 12: as a House candidate, to separate yourselves from the national 950 00:50:19,440 --> 00:50:20,880 Speaker 12: environment and from the top of the ticket. 951 00:50:22,680 --> 00:50:24,520 Speaker 2: Well, I want to talk about the Senate as well, 952 00:50:24,520 --> 00:50:26,560 Speaker 2: and I know you touched on it in your first answer, Aaron, 953 00:50:26,600 --> 00:50:28,880 Speaker 2: this idea that it still is going to be incredibly 954 00:50:28,920 --> 00:50:32,080 Speaker 2: difficult from a map perspective for Democrats to keep control 955 00:50:32,120 --> 00:50:35,160 Speaker 2: of the Senate, given the vulnerability of Senator Shared Brown 956 00:50:35,200 --> 00:50:38,279 Speaker 2: in Ohio and John Tester in Montana. But how do 957 00:50:38,320 --> 00:50:40,400 Speaker 2: you think their odds have changed with now Harris at 958 00:50:40,440 --> 00:50:42,920 Speaker 2: the top of the ticket. Do they have a greater 959 00:50:43,080 --> 00:50:46,520 Speaker 2: likelihood of holding on to their seats or if there 960 00:50:46,600 --> 00:50:48,799 Speaker 2: is any way for the Democrats to keep hold of 961 00:50:48,800 --> 00:50:50,840 Speaker 2: the Senate, do you think it's likely going to require 962 00:50:50,880 --> 00:50:54,160 Speaker 2: them flipping a seat that right now isn't actually seen, 963 00:50:54,239 --> 00:50:57,400 Speaker 2: at least in the prevailing thought as easily flippable, like 964 00:50:57,400 --> 00:50:58,600 Speaker 2: in Florida or Texas. 965 00:51:00,320 --> 00:51:00,560 Speaker 3: Yeah. 966 00:51:00,600 --> 00:51:03,320 Speaker 12: So, I think it is true that Harris has had 967 00:51:04,000 --> 00:51:07,800 Speaker 12: a positive effect on almost all of these down ballot 968 00:51:07,880 --> 00:51:11,840 Speaker 12: races across the country because she has injected new energy 969 00:51:11,880 --> 00:51:14,600 Speaker 12: into these Democratic base voters. And there was a question 970 00:51:15,000 --> 00:51:17,040 Speaker 12: when Biden was at the top of the ticket about 971 00:51:17,040 --> 00:51:19,960 Speaker 12: whether a lot of these Democratic voters would even turned out. 972 00:51:20,000 --> 00:51:21,640 Speaker 12: It wasn't a question of whether they were going to 973 00:51:21,719 --> 00:51:23,759 Speaker 12: vote for Trump, but it was a question of whether 974 00:51:23,760 --> 00:51:25,439 Speaker 12: they were going to vote at all, which of course 975 00:51:25,520 --> 00:51:28,239 Speaker 12: had a trickled out effect on the Senate races and 976 00:51:28,280 --> 00:51:30,399 Speaker 12: the House races as well. So yes, I do think 977 00:51:30,440 --> 00:51:35,000 Speaker 12: she has maybe given Democrats a better slightly better chance 978 00:51:35,160 --> 00:51:38,520 Speaker 12: in Ohio and in Montana. But these are both still 979 00:51:38,840 --> 00:51:41,640 Speaker 12: very difficult states for them, you know, I think they 980 00:51:41,719 --> 00:51:43,759 Speaker 12: have They certainly have a better chance in Ohio. I 981 00:51:43,760 --> 00:51:46,839 Speaker 12: would say we have both of these states rated as 982 00:51:46,920 --> 00:51:50,000 Speaker 12: toss up races. But I think Ohio, just at a 983 00:51:50,000 --> 00:51:53,759 Speaker 12: fundamental level, this is a state that Trump won by 984 00:51:53,840 --> 00:51:57,400 Speaker 12: about eight points in twenty twenty and twenty sixteen, whereas 985 00:51:57,480 --> 00:52:01,480 Speaker 12: Montana Trump won this state by digits in the teams 986 00:52:01,520 --> 00:52:04,080 Speaker 12: for the last couple of cycles. So just in terms 987 00:52:04,080 --> 00:52:08,680 Speaker 12: of the fundamentals of these states, Republicans have a slightly 988 00:52:08,719 --> 00:52:11,960 Speaker 12: better chance in Montana. But then if you're looking at 989 00:52:12,000 --> 00:52:14,120 Speaker 12: the rest of the map, you're right, they do have 990 00:52:14,560 --> 00:52:19,239 Speaker 12: potential offensive opportunities in Texas and in Florida. Now you know, 991 00:52:19,280 --> 00:52:22,000 Speaker 12: these are both states that we expect Trump to win. 992 00:52:22,520 --> 00:52:26,200 Speaker 12: Trump only won them by single digits in twenty twenty, 993 00:52:26,640 --> 00:52:28,719 Speaker 12: but by about mid single digits, and so I would 994 00:52:28,800 --> 00:52:32,160 Speaker 12: be surprised if Harris managed to win either. I think 995 00:52:32,160 --> 00:52:34,239 Speaker 12: they're going to be closer, and I think we're you know, 996 00:52:34,239 --> 00:52:36,520 Speaker 12: in twenty twenty two, we saw Republicans do really well 997 00:52:36,520 --> 00:52:38,480 Speaker 12: in Texas and Florida. I think it's going to be 998 00:52:38,560 --> 00:52:41,239 Speaker 12: more similar to twenty twenty, but that still might not 999 00:52:41,320 --> 00:52:45,680 Speaker 12: be enough for these Democratic Senate candidates to unseat Republican incumbents. 1000 00:52:45,760 --> 00:52:48,560 Speaker 12: So in Texas you have Ted Cruz, who was up 1001 00:52:48,560 --> 00:52:51,440 Speaker 12: for reelection, and obviously we all remember in twenty eighteen, 1002 00:52:51,840 --> 00:52:54,279 Speaker 12: the Democratic nominee there Better o' work only came a 1003 00:52:54,280 --> 00:52:56,719 Speaker 12: couple of points away from unseating him, but that was 1004 00:52:56,760 --> 00:53:00,360 Speaker 12: in a cycle that was uniquely good for Democrats. And 1005 00:53:00,400 --> 00:53:02,520 Speaker 12: we're going to have a much more a little much 1006 00:53:02,520 --> 00:53:05,719 Speaker 12: more even environment this time, and so that makes the 1007 00:53:05,719 --> 00:53:09,239 Speaker 12: Democratic nominee, Colin Alread's task a little bit harder. And 1008 00:53:09,280 --> 00:53:12,000 Speaker 12: then in Florida, here this is a state that used 1009 00:53:12,000 --> 00:53:16,040 Speaker 12: to be quite competitive at the federal level in presidential races, 1010 00:53:16,080 --> 00:53:19,440 Speaker 12: but has moved towards Republicans pretty dramatically over the last 1011 00:53:19,480 --> 00:53:21,719 Speaker 12: couple of cycles. So, you know, I think probably this 1012 00:53:21,840 --> 00:53:24,000 Speaker 12: is still a state that we're going to see Trump 1013 00:53:24,040 --> 00:53:26,600 Speaker 12: winning by single digits. I don't think we're going to 1014 00:53:26,600 --> 00:53:29,360 Speaker 12: see him carrying Florida by double digits, certainly, and especially 1015 00:53:29,360 --> 00:53:31,400 Speaker 12: now with Harris at the top of the ticket, but 1016 00:53:31,719 --> 00:53:33,880 Speaker 12: that is going to make it difficult for the Democratic 1017 00:53:33,920 --> 00:53:36,880 Speaker 12: nominee there to outperform Harris. 1018 00:53:38,800 --> 00:53:41,439 Speaker 2: All right, erin, and finally, before we let you go, 1019 00:53:41,560 --> 00:53:43,200 Speaker 2: this is some other news that I think took some 1020 00:53:43,239 --> 00:53:45,440 Speaker 2: of us a back today, but maybe won't be that 1021 00:53:45,560 --> 00:53:49,440 Speaker 2: surprising to you. I'm not sure Trump's transition team, according 1022 00:53:49,440 --> 00:53:51,359 Speaker 2: to the campaign, is going to be co chaired by 1023 00:53:51,400 --> 00:53:54,759 Speaker 2: two former Democrats, Robert F. Kennedy Junior, who of course 1024 00:53:54,800 --> 00:53:59,960 Speaker 2: just suspended his presidential campaign, and former Democratic Congresswoman Tolsi Gabber. 1025 00:54:00,800 --> 00:54:03,720 Speaker 2: Are you surprised by this or should we not actually 1026 00:54:03,760 --> 00:54:06,840 Speaker 2: be considering these people as former Democrats because they are 1027 00:54:06,880 --> 00:54:10,280 Speaker 2: so now far removed from where the party finds itself today. 1028 00:54:11,840 --> 00:54:14,920 Speaker 12: Yeah, it's a good question, you know. I think Tulci Gabbard, 1029 00:54:14,920 --> 00:54:18,920 Speaker 12: obviously she ran for the Democratic presidential nomination twenty twenty 1030 00:54:18,960 --> 00:54:21,640 Speaker 12: and used to be a Democratic congresswoman, but I think 1031 00:54:21,680 --> 00:54:24,880 Speaker 12: she has moved pretty consistently to the right over the 1032 00:54:24,880 --> 00:54:28,879 Speaker 12: past couple of years, and I'm not sure that her 1033 00:54:29,120 --> 00:54:33,839 Speaker 12: involvement with his campaign is going to have a significant impact, though, 1034 00:54:33,880 --> 00:54:37,240 Speaker 12: you know, it could have a marginal impact with undecided voters. 1035 00:54:37,640 --> 00:54:40,080 Speaker 12: I think we've seen the number of undecided voters has 1036 00:54:40,120 --> 00:54:43,560 Speaker 12: certainly shrunk since Harris got in the race. You know, 1037 00:54:43,600 --> 00:54:46,800 Speaker 12: before what we were seeing was that Trump was performing 1038 00:54:46,880 --> 00:54:51,280 Speaker 12: about steady, but Biden's numbers were dropping. Now we see 1039 00:54:51,360 --> 00:54:55,640 Speaker 12: that Harris has kind of consolidated Democratic support and Democratic 1040 00:54:55,719 --> 00:54:59,120 Speaker 12: leaning independent support, and so now the number of undecided 1041 00:54:59,200 --> 00:55:02,760 Speaker 12: voters who might vote for some of these third party 1042 00:55:02,800 --> 00:55:05,960 Speaker 12: candidates who are still on the ballot, that number has shrunk. 1043 00:55:06,440 --> 00:55:09,480 Speaker 12: So they're both both candidates are fighting over a pretty 1044 00:55:09,480 --> 00:55:12,800 Speaker 12: small group of voters at this point. So who knows. 1045 00:55:12,840 --> 00:55:17,400 Speaker 12: Maybe Gabbard and rfk's involvement in Trump's campaign could sway 1046 00:55:17,719 --> 00:55:21,120 Speaker 12: enough voters to make a key difference in the battleground states, 1047 00:55:21,640 --> 00:55:24,000 Speaker 12: but I don't think it's going to have ultimately a 1048 00:55:24,120 --> 00:55:25,759 Speaker 12: huge impact on the contours of this. 1049 00:55:25,800 --> 00:55:26,719 Speaker 4: Race, all right. 1050 00:55:26,760 --> 00:55:29,200 Speaker 2: Aaron Covey of the Cook Political Report, always great to 1051 00:55:29,200 --> 00:55:31,880 Speaker 2: get your analysis. Thank you so much, appreciate your insight 1052 00:55:32,200 --> 00:55:34,279 Speaker 2: into the down ballot races. We should be watching, and 1053 00:55:34,320 --> 00:55:35,840 Speaker 2: I would point out that we are still in the 1054 00:55:35,880 --> 00:55:38,680 Speaker 2: middle of primary season that will decide ultimately who the 1055 00:55:38,719 --> 00:55:41,880 Speaker 2: final general election candidates are in a number of these states, 1056 00:55:41,880 --> 00:55:45,840 Speaker 2: including next week after Labor Day, on September third, the 1057 00:55:45,880 --> 00:55:49,400 Speaker 2: Senate and House primaries take place in Massachusetts, and for 1058 00:55:49,440 --> 00:55:52,560 Speaker 2: our listeners in Massachusetts and all of New England here 1059 00:55:52,600 --> 00:55:56,520 Speaker 2: on Bloomberg Radio. Starting on September third, how convenient you 1060 00:55:56,560 --> 00:55:59,000 Speaker 2: can listen to Bloomberg Radio in and around Boston on 1061 00:55:59,080 --> 00:56:02,400 Speaker 2: our new signal nineth FM. It's your news source for 1062 00:56:02,520 --> 00:56:05,120 Speaker 2: business news from the financial center of New England. Of course, 1063 00:56:05,160 --> 00:56:07,759 Speaker 2: will on Balance of Power have all the politics news, 1064 00:56:07,760 --> 00:56:11,000 Speaker 2: including the results of those primaries cover for you as well. Again, 1065 00:56:11,040 --> 00:56:13,879 Speaker 2: Bloomberg Radio is moving to ninety two nine FM at 1066 00:56:13,880 --> 00:56:16,520 Speaker 2: noon on the day after Labor Day. 1067 00:56:20,200 --> 00:56:23,440 Speaker 1: Thanks for listening to the Balance of Power podcast. Make 1068 00:56:23,440 --> 00:56:26,400 Speaker 1: sure to subscribe if you haven't already, at Apple, Spotify, 1069 00:56:26,520 --> 00:56:29,080 Speaker 1: or wherever you get your podcasts, and you can find 1070 00:56:29,160 --> 00:56:32,400 Speaker 1: us live every weekday from Washington, DC at noontime Eastern 1071 00:56:32,680 --> 00:56:34,080 Speaker 1: at Bloomberg dot com.