WEBVTT - FTX's Missing Billions and Neuralink's Promise

0:00:14.600 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>I met Ludlow in San Francisco. This is Bloomberg Technology,

0:00:17.920 --> 0:00:21.599
<v Speaker 1>Sam bankman Fried speaks, but questions remain. We discussed the

0:00:21.640 --> 0:00:25.919
<v Speaker 1>mystery that still surrounds the missing billions at spfs, bankrupt

0:00:25.960 --> 0:00:29.720
<v Speaker 1>crypto exchange f t X. Then we're turning into a

0:00:29.800 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 1>buy now, pay later economy, especially this holiday season as

0:00:33.960 --> 0:00:38.560
<v Speaker 1>shoppers try to stretch their dollar. Klaners CEO on its

0:00:38.600 --> 0:00:42.239
<v Speaker 1>fight to reach profitability and how regulation could impact the

0:00:42.280 --> 0:00:46.200
<v Speaker 1>buy now, pay later industry. And Musk takes a break

0:00:46.240 --> 0:00:49.519
<v Speaker 1>from Twitter to talk well brain surgery. The world's richest

0:00:49.520 --> 0:00:53.519
<v Speaker 1>person says Neuralink could start human implants within six months

0:00:53.840 --> 0:00:58.000
<v Speaker 1>and makes big promises for the tech, including cures for

0:00:58.080 --> 0:01:02.200
<v Speaker 1>paralysis and blindness. Welcome, fus, let's gonna check on those

0:01:02.240 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>markets here. It's been Katie Rfield high. Katie High ed Well,

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:08.720
<v Speaker 1>it was a pretty muted day overall. Remember we had

0:01:08.760 --> 0:01:12.160
<v Speaker 1>a big, big rally yesterday after Pal suggested that maybe

0:01:12.280 --> 0:01:15.480
<v Speaker 1>the FED might start dialing back the pace of rate hikes.

0:01:15.480 --> 0:01:18.039
<v Speaker 1>Then you look today ahead, the big payrolls print tomorrow.

0:01:18.319 --> 0:01:20.800
<v Speaker 1>Not too much movement in the SMP five hundred. The

0:01:20.880 --> 0:01:23.560
<v Speaker 1>NASA one squeaked out a little bit of a game.

0:01:23.640 --> 0:01:26.319
<v Speaker 1>You did see a big drop in the socks, but

0:01:26.680 --> 0:01:30.280
<v Speaker 1>again at the big benchmark level, not too much movement,

0:01:30.400 --> 0:01:32.840
<v Speaker 1>even though we're looking at a pretty big rally in

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:36.160
<v Speaker 1>the bond market, those tenure treasure yields dropping by about

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:40.319
<v Speaker 1>ten basis points or so. But this muted volatility that

0:01:40.319 --> 0:01:42.800
<v Speaker 1>we've been seeing in the markets, it's definitely a theme.

0:01:42.880 --> 0:01:45.600
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a look at the volatility index, the VIX,

0:01:45.920 --> 0:01:49.600
<v Speaker 1>if you will. It dropped below twenty. It's has a

0:01:49.760 --> 0:01:52.080
<v Speaker 1>nineteen handle, and as you can see, it's just been

0:01:52.080 --> 0:01:55.440
<v Speaker 1>grinding tighter and tighter in this very narrow range. So,

0:01:55.520 --> 0:01:57.160
<v Speaker 1>even though I don't know, it's felt like a pretty

0:01:57.200 --> 0:02:00.880
<v Speaker 1>volatile year, not too much action at the our market level.

0:02:00.920 --> 0:02:03.480
<v Speaker 1>But I'm dying to talk about crypto. Let's do that

0:02:03.600 --> 0:02:07.559
<v Speaker 1>right now and look at bitcoin, because Bitcoin, even amid

0:02:07.600 --> 0:02:09.800
<v Speaker 1>all of this chaos that we're seeing at the company

0:02:09.880 --> 0:02:11.720
<v Speaker 1>level in the wake of what we saw with f

0:02:11.840 --> 0:02:14.679
<v Speaker 1>t X, bitcoin is actually having a pretty good run.

0:02:14.760 --> 0:02:16.960
<v Speaker 1>It's up about two and a half percent or so

0:02:17.120 --> 0:02:19.799
<v Speaker 1>over the past five days, and I'm going to say

0:02:19.800 --> 0:02:23.440
<v Speaker 1>it's a macro asset. It's doing fine, all right, Let's

0:02:23.440 --> 0:02:26.120
<v Speaker 1>stick with this broader theme, Katie, stay with us. We

0:02:26.200 --> 0:02:28.640
<v Speaker 1>look at the biggest story in crypto right now, the

0:02:28.760 --> 0:02:31.560
<v Speaker 1>ongoing story f t X is collapse and Sam Bank

0:02:31.600 --> 0:02:34.280
<v Speaker 1>and and Freed, who was at one point worth twenty

0:02:34.400 --> 0:02:38.160
<v Speaker 1>six billion dollars he now claims quote that's worth close

0:02:38.240 --> 0:02:40.959
<v Speaker 1>to nothing. Those were his words at the New York

0:02:41.000 --> 0:02:44.560
<v Speaker 1>Times deal Books summit yesterday, and luckily for us, Bloomberg's

0:02:44.560 --> 0:02:46.919
<v Speaker 1>Annie Massa was in the room and joins us now

0:02:47.320 --> 0:02:51.280
<v Speaker 1>for more. Did we solve the mystery, Annie, of the

0:02:51.320 --> 0:02:54.480
<v Speaker 1>missing billions and where they are? I think that would

0:02:54.480 --> 0:02:57.040
<v Speaker 1>be a little bit too easy. We're far from fully

0:02:57.080 --> 0:03:00.919
<v Speaker 1>having solved the mystery. Um, So yes your day. SPF

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:03.200
<v Speaker 1>did speak at the deal book conference here in New York,

0:03:03.400 --> 0:03:06.720
<v Speaker 1>and I would say he answered a lot of questions,

0:03:06.760 --> 0:03:09.520
<v Speaker 1>but we didn't get a lot of answers. He's kind

0:03:09.560 --> 0:03:12.400
<v Speaker 1>of on an apology tour now, giving his side of

0:03:12.400 --> 0:03:15.280
<v Speaker 1>the story and saying that he's sorry that he screwed

0:03:15.400 --> 0:03:20.280
<v Speaker 1>up um and overextended basically, but he he as far

0:03:20.320 --> 0:03:24.280
<v Speaker 1>as actually offering any explanation of what went wrong. Uh,

0:03:24.480 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 1>he hasn't given us much and there was some surprise

0:03:27.800 --> 0:03:31.440
<v Speaker 1>that he actually turned up, albeit virtually, you know, he

0:03:31.680 --> 0:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>joined from the Bahamas. But you were there, there was

0:03:35.000 --> 0:03:38.600
<v Speaker 1>some protests on site against him appearing at the conference,

0:03:38.640 --> 0:03:41.520
<v Speaker 1>weren't there, absolutely So, even to get into the venue,

0:03:41.600 --> 0:03:45.920
<v Speaker 1>which was in Columbus Circle in Manhattan, there were protesters outside,

0:03:45.960 --> 0:03:49.560
<v Speaker 1>kind of these dueling camps of protesters who were protesting

0:03:49.560 --> 0:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>not just SPF and had pamphlets saying that this guy

0:03:53.200 --> 0:03:56.400
<v Speaker 1>is an embezzler, but they were also protesting others on

0:03:56.480 --> 0:03:58.440
<v Speaker 1>the on the program as well, which was a little

0:03:58.440 --> 0:04:00.760
<v Speaker 1>bit of a surprise to see all their name alongside

0:04:01.200 --> 0:04:04.040
<v Speaker 1>uh Sam Bankman, Freed's, but he was one of the

0:04:04.080 --> 0:04:07.160
<v Speaker 1>people making an appearance there that they were absolutely protesting.

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:11.560
<v Speaker 1>It was a little bit controversial that he appeared at all.

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:15.360
<v Speaker 1>He was on this program to appear at the conference

0:04:15.640 --> 0:04:17.920
<v Speaker 1>long before f t x S blow up, and so

0:04:18.000 --> 0:04:21.080
<v Speaker 1>some people were surprised that he got the platform to speak.

0:04:21.520 --> 0:04:24.280
<v Speaker 1>But to their credit, there were some really tough questions

0:04:24.400 --> 0:04:29.839
<v Speaker 1>and SPF tried to wriggle free but didn't really pull

0:04:29.920 --> 0:04:33.080
<v Speaker 1>that off. Well, Anny, to your point, it's just amazing

0:04:33.120 --> 0:04:35.640
<v Speaker 1>that this man keeps talking, and I want to talk

0:04:35.680 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 1>about where we could see him speak next, because the

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:42.159
<v Speaker 1>Senate did here held hearing today on the f t

0:04:42.440 --> 0:04:46.280
<v Speaker 1>X collapse. Can we expect to see SPF actually on

0:04:46.320 --> 0:04:49.239
<v Speaker 1>the floor of Congress at any point? I mean, it's

0:04:49.279 --> 0:04:52.760
<v Speaker 1>definitely possible. One thing that came up at the conference was, uh,

0:04:53.279 --> 0:04:56.640
<v Speaker 1>SPF was asked, what do your lawyers make of the

0:04:56.680 --> 0:04:59.560
<v Speaker 1>fact that you're appearing here today virtually? And he kind

0:04:59.560 --> 0:05:03.240
<v Speaker 1>of grumb that they didn't really they weren't too happy

0:05:03.279 --> 0:05:07.000
<v Speaker 1>about it. So he's going about rogue. It would appear, Katie,

0:05:07.000 --> 0:05:10.240
<v Speaker 1>we were glued to our computer screens, as we always are.

0:05:10.760 --> 0:05:14.520
<v Speaker 1>SPF not the only speaker, not at least on this topic.

0:05:15.040 --> 0:05:18.760
<v Speaker 1>Janet Yellen, Treasury Secretary, what she's been talking about. You know,

0:05:19.120 --> 0:05:21.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, I mean, I'll let me take this. I

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:24.279
<v Speaker 1>want to talk about Janet Yellen because it's interesting trying

0:05:24.320 --> 0:05:27.680
<v Speaker 1>to map the contagion. Obviously, when we talk about contagion,

0:05:27.680 --> 0:05:29.839
<v Speaker 1>there's been a lot of worries about spill over into

0:05:29.880 --> 0:05:33.160
<v Speaker 1>the broader financial system. But Jannet Yell and she did

0:05:33.160 --> 0:05:35.799
<v Speaker 1>say yesterday that if you look for the silver linings,

0:05:35.839 --> 0:05:39.520
<v Speaker 1>basically the good part of this explosion that it hasn't

0:05:39.560 --> 0:05:43.000
<v Speaker 1>really spilled over into the traditional banking sector, and that

0:05:43.040 --> 0:05:45.960
<v Speaker 1>point was actually echoed by Michael bar today, of course,

0:05:45.960 --> 0:05:48.719
<v Speaker 1>the FED Vice Chair for Supervision. He said that the

0:05:48.800 --> 0:05:52.480
<v Speaker 1>crypto risks to the core financial system, they've been muted

0:05:52.720 --> 0:05:55.760
<v Speaker 1>so far, So if you're looking for systemic sort of

0:05:55.839 --> 0:05:59.240
<v Speaker 1>fears here, they really haven't appeared yet. A lot of

0:05:59.320 --> 0:06:02.120
<v Speaker 1>folks have been going in. Annie. We just heard about

0:06:02.120 --> 0:06:05.800
<v Speaker 1>the kind of yelling perspective. Larry Fink, for example, what

0:06:05.839 --> 0:06:09.760
<v Speaker 1>are these voices saying about the f t X situation. Yeah,

0:06:09.800 --> 0:06:11.960
<v Speaker 1>Larry thinks an interesting one. He was also on the

0:06:11.960 --> 0:06:15.279
<v Speaker 1>program at the deal but conference yesterday and he mentioned

0:06:15.720 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 1>this is known, but black Rock had some exposure to

0:06:19.440 --> 0:06:21.600
<v Speaker 1>f t X. It had made a twenty four million

0:06:21.640 --> 0:06:25.080
<v Speaker 1>dollar investment through a fund of funds. So Fink was

0:06:25.120 --> 0:06:28.640
<v Speaker 1>saying that he thinks that there's definitely a reckoning to

0:06:28.720 --> 0:06:31.880
<v Speaker 1>come and black Rock is not immune from that, nor

0:06:31.920 --> 0:06:34.640
<v Speaker 1>are any number of vcs that invested in f t X.

0:06:35.839 --> 0:06:40.320
<v Speaker 1>Okay Bloombergs, Katie Growfeld and Annie Massa unraveling the unravellable

0:06:40.480 --> 0:06:43.800
<v Speaker 1>thank you. Meanwhile, Apple is ramping up work on its

0:06:43.839 --> 0:06:47.800
<v Speaker 1>long awaited mixed reality headset. The company changed the name

0:06:47.839 --> 0:06:51.520
<v Speaker 1>of the operating system to x r O S. According

0:06:51.520 --> 0:06:55.279
<v Speaker 1>to sources, that's a nod to extended reality, which encompasses

0:06:55.320 --> 0:06:59.160
<v Speaker 1>both augmented and virtual reality. The headset would be its

0:06:59.200 --> 0:07:02.440
<v Speaker 1>first major new product category since the Apple Watch in

0:07:02.480 --> 0:07:06.080
<v Speaker 1>twenty fifteen. Who had the scoop, of course, bloombergs Mark German,

0:07:06.320 --> 0:07:09.440
<v Speaker 1>who joins US now from Los Angeles, mark, x R

0:07:09.480 --> 0:07:12.560
<v Speaker 1>O S. What's the thinking behind it? Yeah, Ed, thank

0:07:12.560 --> 0:07:14.520
<v Speaker 1>you so much for having me so. Originally, when they've

0:07:14.560 --> 0:07:17.640
<v Speaker 1>been working on this mixed reality operating system, which, like

0:07:17.680 --> 0:07:19.680
<v Speaker 1>you said, blend's a R and v R, they were

0:07:19.720 --> 0:07:22.520
<v Speaker 1>calling it reality O S and r OS, but they've

0:07:22.520 --> 0:07:25.920
<v Speaker 1>shifted now to a term called x R O S.

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:30.920
<v Speaker 1>It's a bit shorter and it's more translatable across many geographies. Right,

0:07:31.000 --> 0:07:34.200
<v Speaker 1>reality is not a word like iPad or iPhone or

0:07:34.280 --> 0:07:37.440
<v Speaker 1>watch or TV that's very universal. Reality is not a

0:07:37.520 --> 0:07:40.120
<v Speaker 1>universal word, so they needed more of a universal term.

0:07:40.400 --> 0:07:43.640
<v Speaker 1>That's why they're leaning towards x R OS. They've also

0:07:43.840 --> 0:07:47.600
<v Speaker 1>trademarked x R O S in several countries internationally, and

0:07:47.640 --> 0:07:49.680
<v Speaker 1>they're fighting for the trademark in the U S as

0:07:49.720 --> 0:07:53.600
<v Speaker 1>well with an unrelated Chinese company who actually coincidentally filed

0:07:53.640 --> 0:07:55.720
<v Speaker 1>for the x r O S name back in March.

0:07:56.760 --> 0:07:59.680
<v Speaker 1>In real terms, this is a market that Meta dominates

0:07:59.800 --> 0:08:03.000
<v Speaker 1>right to the A A VA headset. What's the timeline

0:08:03.400 --> 0:08:07.160
<v Speaker 1>for Apple to bring this product to market. It's still

0:08:07.160 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 1>a pretty small market, but technically yes, Meta is the

0:08:10.800 --> 0:08:15.040
<v Speaker 1>dominant player there with their Quest headsets, Sony with their PSVR,

0:08:15.160 --> 0:08:18.000
<v Speaker 1>their PlayStation VR. There's a new one coming U soon

0:08:18.040 --> 0:08:23.120
<v Speaker 1>as well. They're a big player there. HTC Lenovo. Samsung

0:08:23.160 --> 0:08:25.440
<v Speaker 1>has played in a little bit with partnerships with back

0:08:25.480 --> 0:08:28.400
<v Speaker 1>in the day what was called Facebook. In terms of Apple,

0:08:29.960 --> 0:08:32.040
<v Speaker 1>is the year of the Apple headset. It's going to

0:08:32.120 --> 0:08:34.920
<v Speaker 1>be called probably the Reality one or the Reality Pro

0:08:35.000 --> 0:08:38.280
<v Speaker 1>headset run x r os. It's going to have mixed

0:08:38.320 --> 0:08:44.400
<v Speaker 1>reality versions of messages, of maps, of FaceTime, games, video watching, TV,

0:08:44.520 --> 0:08:48.280
<v Speaker 1>plus you name it, live sports streaming in virtual reality

0:08:48.320 --> 0:08:50.720
<v Speaker 1>in a three D like environment. This is going to

0:08:50.760 --> 0:08:53.640
<v Speaker 1>be the hot product of This is really gonna be

0:08:53.679 --> 0:08:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Apple's next big thing. It'll be introduced sometime around the

0:08:57.240 --> 0:08:59.640
<v Speaker 1>middle of the year. Most likely. It's going to be

0:08:59.679 --> 0:09:02.079
<v Speaker 1>quite a friendsive. Apple has been looking at price points

0:09:02.120 --> 0:09:04.959
<v Speaker 1>between two and three thousand dollars, certainly going to be

0:09:05.000 --> 0:09:08.199
<v Speaker 1>the most advanced mixed reality headset on the market today

0:09:08.520 --> 0:09:12.120
<v Speaker 1>really going you know, full throttle on both of those technologies.

0:09:12.160 --> 0:09:14.160
<v Speaker 1>It will have the best cameras on the market for

0:09:14.240 --> 0:09:16.960
<v Speaker 1>a R, but it will also have the best displays

0:09:17.000 --> 0:09:19.880
<v Speaker 1>on the market for VR in The real magic of

0:09:19.880 --> 0:09:21.600
<v Speaker 1>this headset is how Apple is going to be able

0:09:21.640 --> 0:09:24.200
<v Speaker 1>to blend the two in a way that you haven't

0:09:24.240 --> 0:09:28.280
<v Speaker 1>seen Meta or others do so far. Alright, three year

0:09:28.360 --> 0:09:30.760
<v Speaker 1>if the Apple Virtual Reality headset. You heard it here

0:09:30.800 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 1>first bloom bogs Mark, German, thank you. Black Friday has

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:47.160
<v Speaker 1>been boom time for by Now Pay Later products. It's

0:09:47.160 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 1>a financial product that lets you pay in installments, and

0:09:49.960 --> 0:09:55.440
<v Speaker 1>its use has skyrocketed during the holiday shopping extravaganza. Adobe

0:09:55.720 --> 0:10:00.640
<v Speaker 1>says that it's use climbed compared to pre a day,

0:10:00.720 --> 0:10:03.920
<v Speaker 1>and one provider after Pay said it's use actually rose

0:10:05.559 --> 0:10:08.160
<v Speaker 1>compared to the pre holiday season. But does this all

0:10:08.200 --> 0:10:11.280
<v Speaker 1>mean we're actually setting ourselves up for a debt headache

0:10:11.360 --> 0:10:15.560
<v Speaker 1>in the future. They do promise interest free payments only

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:19.760
<v Speaker 1>free if you follow the rules, so check the small print,

0:10:20.080 --> 0:10:22.920
<v Speaker 1>because if when you're a longer term monthly by Now

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 1>Pay Later plan, you could be up to thirty in

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:28.800
<v Speaker 1>terms of interest costs. Maybe if you do a late

0:10:28.840 --> 0:10:31.520
<v Speaker 1>fee or have to reschedule a payment, that could cost

0:10:31.520 --> 0:10:35.560
<v Speaker 1>you from one to ten dollars. Ago, roughly eleven of

0:10:35.640 --> 0:10:38.880
<v Speaker 1>all borrowers using by Now pay Later fell behind schedule

0:10:38.960 --> 0:10:43.000
<v Speaker 1>in their payments, and if you're years old, that lumber

0:10:43.040 --> 0:10:48.439
<v Speaker 1>grows to almost h That was, of course, Bloomberg's Caroline

0:10:48.520 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 1>hide there on by Now Pay Later trends in the

0:10:51.400 --> 0:10:54.800
<v Speaker 1>holiday shopping season. We also took to Twitter to ask

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:58.680
<v Speaker 1>our audience about this, and while b MPL is gaining ground,

0:10:58.800 --> 0:11:01.520
<v Speaker 1>it does seem, based on our phole, that the credit

0:11:01.559 --> 0:11:04.320
<v Speaker 1>card is still king when it comes to the preferred

0:11:05.240 --> 0:11:07.800
<v Speaker 1>means of spending. I want to bring in Claner CEO

0:11:08.200 --> 0:11:11.160
<v Speaker 1>Sebastian Shimmy Atkovski for more on this. We're going to

0:11:11.200 --> 0:11:14.920
<v Speaker 1>talk about your earnings. But first by Now pay Later.

0:11:15.440 --> 0:11:17.800
<v Speaker 1>I bet you've got a pretty interesting take on the

0:11:17.920 --> 0:11:22.120
<v Speaker 1>clan of you for buy now pay Later. Well sure,

0:11:22.160 --> 0:11:24.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, first of all, we actually think of ourselves

0:11:24.040 --> 0:11:27.920
<v Speaker 1>as a payment network, a third party payment network, you know,

0:11:28.640 --> 0:11:31.200
<v Speaker 1>VI sell master Card kind of thing, and so of

0:11:31.200 --> 0:11:34.720
<v Speaker 1>our volumes debitum. We're obviously associated with credit, but just

0:11:35.000 --> 0:11:38.480
<v Speaker 1>worth highlighting that fact. With that set, I do think

0:11:38.480 --> 0:11:42.240
<v Speaker 1>by an alpulator is a better formulated credit product than

0:11:42.240 --> 0:11:44.560
<v Speaker 1>a credit card, right, So it doesn't push you into revolving,

0:11:45.080 --> 0:11:47.600
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't. It's not borrowing against all of your spending.

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:50.640
<v Speaker 1>It's only for single transactions, and it has a fixed

0:11:50.640 --> 0:11:53.760
<v Speaker 1>installment period and it's no interest. Right. So we think

0:11:53.880 --> 0:11:57.120
<v Speaker 1>genuinely speaking, if more consumers ten years from now have

0:11:57.360 --> 0:12:00.360
<v Speaker 1>debit cards in use by alpulated for occasional purchases versus

0:12:00.360 --> 0:12:03.200
<v Speaker 1>everyone having credit cards, we are going to see that's

0:12:03.240 --> 0:12:06.120
<v Speaker 1>a better world. And losses on our portfolios are about

0:12:07.120 --> 0:12:09.760
<v Speaker 1>below crey card industry standards, so I think that's also

0:12:09.840 --> 0:12:14.200
<v Speaker 1>kind of some indications of this being in healthier form

0:12:14.200 --> 0:12:16.920
<v Speaker 1>of credit, but it is still credit, right, let's just

0:12:16.920 --> 0:12:20.400
<v Speaker 1>be here about her. So, Bacily, you just posted earnings

0:12:20.400 --> 0:12:24.000
<v Speaker 1>third quarter earnings two one million dollar operating loss and

0:12:24.120 --> 0:12:29.280
<v Speaker 1>improvement quarter on quarter but year on year, slightly worrying,

0:12:29.320 --> 0:12:31.880
<v Speaker 1>and yet you still have this goal to push to profitability.

0:12:31.960 --> 0:12:35.640
<v Speaker 1>How do you re ensure your reassure your investors that

0:12:35.679 --> 0:12:39.760
<v Speaker 1>you are on that path to profitability? Well, actually, because

0:12:39.800 --> 0:12:42.720
<v Speaker 1>exactly of that, right, So when um, you know last

0:12:42.800 --> 0:12:45.400
<v Speaker 1>year Obviously, investor sentiment looked very differently than it does

0:12:45.440 --> 0:12:48.040
<v Speaker 1>this year, and so everyone was asking us to lean

0:12:48.559 --> 0:12:51.280
<v Speaker 1>entirely into the future and was rewarding us right and

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:54.200
<v Speaker 1>as much as looking back now, you know, if you

0:12:54.280 --> 0:12:57.400
<v Speaker 1>think about at that point of time the investment trade,

0:12:57.440 --> 0:13:00.599
<v Speaker 1>you grab it was consuming about two and dilution on

0:13:00.640 --> 0:13:03.680
<v Speaker 1>an annual basis, so it wasn't crazy from that perspective.

0:13:03.920 --> 0:13:07.160
<v Speaker 1>But obviously invest sentimis has change. People want you to

0:13:07.160 --> 0:13:09.240
<v Speaker 1>focus on proftability and we have the benefit here Clona.

0:13:09.320 --> 0:13:11.600
<v Speaker 1>We were profitable up until eight nineteen when we started

0:13:11.600 --> 0:13:14.160
<v Speaker 1>investing heavily into the US market, so we know how

0:13:14.160 --> 0:13:17.520
<v Speaker 1>to make money. Our European business makes about a billion

0:13:17.520 --> 0:13:21.560
<v Speaker 1>dollars in gross profit annually UM. So we decided, you know,

0:13:21.720 --> 0:13:24.840
<v Speaker 1>we had to take the top decisions. We actually started

0:13:25.240 --> 0:13:27.439
<v Speaker 1>being a little bit more conservative on our underwriting already

0:13:27.440 --> 0:13:31.439
<v Speaker 1>in January, and then increased that conservatism in May in

0:13:31.840 --> 0:13:36.320
<v Speaker 1>combination with you know, reducing our investment into the long

0:13:36.440 --> 0:13:39.520
<v Speaker 1>term future. And they presented a plan. So obviously a

0:13:39.600 --> 0:13:42.920
<v Speaker 1>year year comparison right now isn't really relevant because the

0:13:43.000 --> 0:13:45.719
<v Speaker 1>plan came into effect in May June, and so far

0:13:45.880 --> 0:13:50.200
<v Speaker 1>already this quarter versus previous quarter. We reduced our are

0:13:50.240 --> 0:13:52.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, quary lost by fort so you know our

0:13:53.000 --> 0:13:55.640
<v Speaker 1>invest is looking at that feel confident, like, Okay. The

0:13:55.679 --> 0:13:57.960
<v Speaker 1>ambition that we set out when we raised money in

0:13:58.000 --> 0:14:01.679
<v Speaker 1>May June to reach profitability again somewhere a month by

0:14:01.720 --> 0:14:05.120
<v Speaker 1>month basis after summer next year is entirely achievable and

0:14:05.160 --> 0:14:07.480
<v Speaker 1>we're on target to to to be back at that.

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:10.040
<v Speaker 1>The US is an interesting one, isn't it. I think

0:14:10.040 --> 0:14:12.600
<v Speaker 1>you hit thirty one million customers in the US in

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:16.880
<v Speaker 1>the third quarter, just gone, what did you learn about

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:19.720
<v Speaker 1>this market? And then what does the expansion look like

0:14:19.840 --> 0:14:23.760
<v Speaker 1>going forward for you? Super super excited by the US.

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean in despite the fact that we've been a

0:14:26.160 --> 0:14:28.960
<v Speaker 1>little bit you know, we've tied up credit underwriting due

0:14:28.960 --> 0:14:32.400
<v Speaker 1>to the macro environment. We're also obviously in generally commerced

0:14:32.520 --> 0:14:36.240
<v Speaker 1>right now, everyone is not really comparing apples and apples

0:14:36.320 --> 0:14:38.080
<v Speaker 1>is all apple and bananas because you know, a year

0:14:38.080 --> 0:14:39.760
<v Speaker 1>ago I was in San Francisco and there was nobody

0:14:39.800 --> 0:14:42.360
<v Speaker 1>in the streets. You know, there was impossible to get

0:14:42.360 --> 0:14:45.720
<v Speaker 1>a meeting because there was COVID restrictions all over the place. Right,

0:14:45.760 --> 0:14:48.320
<v Speaker 1>So the comparisons are still not entirely there for you, commus,

0:14:48.360 --> 0:14:51.440
<v Speaker 1>but we're seeing n growth you know, ye versus last

0:14:51.520 --> 0:14:54.560
<v Speaker 1>year and seeing tremendous I mean, I just think more

0:14:54.560 --> 0:14:56.680
<v Speaker 1>and more consumers in the US are dead tired of

0:14:56.720 --> 0:14:59.520
<v Speaker 1>credit cards of you know, just go to Netflix and

0:14:59.560 --> 0:15:01.920
<v Speaker 1>watch cred Card Explains, and you see all the dirty

0:15:01.960 --> 0:15:04.520
<v Speaker 1>tactics that the industry has applied against the best interests

0:15:04.520 --> 0:15:06.840
<v Speaker 1>of its customers. This is a healthy model. You're seeing

0:15:06.840 --> 0:15:08.600
<v Speaker 1>that shift, right, and your seven eight percent in your

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:11.000
<v Speaker 1>Twitter poll is indicating that. But at the beginning, it's

0:15:11.000 --> 0:15:13.320
<v Speaker 1>still the beginning. You gotta remember in the Nordics, where

0:15:13.320 --> 0:15:15.920
<v Speaker 1>were active plan up processes more than half of all

0:15:16.080 --> 0:15:20.600
<v Speaker 1>e commerce payments, right, So it tells you something on

0:15:20.680 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 1>how effective and successful this mall can be once it's

0:15:23.360 --> 0:15:24.680
<v Speaker 1>what It takes a little bit time to get there,

0:15:25.320 --> 0:15:27.720
<v Speaker 1>sebasting very quickly. I know you stayed late for us

0:15:27.720 --> 0:15:33.360
<v Speaker 1>out there in Sweden. Layoffs in this industry, layoffs for you, well,

0:15:33.640 --> 0:15:37.240
<v Speaker 1>we we obviously unfortunately have to take that tough decision.

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:39.160
<v Speaker 1>We did it back in May. It was a little

0:15:39.200 --> 0:15:44.040
<v Speaker 1>bit earlier than a lot of other companies. And and

0:15:44.360 --> 0:15:46.600
<v Speaker 1>but because you know, I have the benefit of the noon.

0:15:46.640 --> 0:15:49.200
<v Speaker 1>This for seventeen years. So I was part of Plana

0:15:49.280 --> 0:15:51.840
<v Speaker 1>back in the financial press of seven and eight and

0:15:51.640 --> 0:15:54.760
<v Speaker 1>and we at least try to. Our ambition was to

0:15:54.800 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>take the tough decision that we unfortunately have to do,

0:15:57.200 --> 0:16:00.320
<v Speaker 1>to the shift investor sentiment and make those changes. So

0:16:00.480 --> 0:16:02.400
<v Speaker 1>we we hope that we've done what we what we

0:16:02.440 --> 0:16:06.120
<v Speaker 1>need to done, and consider if the market Maclaconna environment

0:16:06.160 --> 0:16:07.800
<v Speaker 1>stats the same, we think that we've done what we

0:16:07.800 --> 0:16:11.920
<v Speaker 1>need to do. Okay, klan A CEO, Sebasti and Schimyatkovski,

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:16.520
<v Speaker 1>thank you. Now. Chip maker TSMC will now offer advanced

0:16:16.600 --> 0:16:20.040
<v Speaker 1>four nanome to chips when it's new twelve billion dollar

0:16:20.120 --> 0:16:24.560
<v Speaker 1>plant in Arizona opens in this after US customers like

0:16:24.680 --> 0:16:27.760
<v Speaker 1>Apple pushed the company to do so. According to sources,

0:16:28.000 --> 0:16:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's Debbie We reported that Bloomberg scoop Debbie, what will

0:16:32.520 --> 0:16:35.600
<v Speaker 1>they be doing them when they open this plant? So,

0:16:35.880 --> 0:16:38.840
<v Speaker 1>like you said, add the t SMC will well announced

0:16:38.840 --> 0:16:42.400
<v Speaker 1>next Tuesday that they will start making an advanced for

0:16:42.600 --> 0:16:45.600
<v Speaker 1>nelometer chips in Arizon now when the plan comes in

0:16:45.720 --> 0:16:49.280
<v Speaker 1>light in two and this is an upgrade from their

0:16:49.280 --> 0:16:54.280
<v Speaker 1>original plan. After our customers, including an Apple, uh A

0:16:54.440 --> 0:16:56.800
<v Speaker 1>and d and and media urged them to make more

0:16:56.880 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 1>advanced chips in America. So, uh this comes at the

0:17:01.160 --> 0:17:05.359
<v Speaker 1>time that trade tensions and also a supply chain disruptions

0:17:05.359 --> 0:17:08.640
<v Speaker 1>over the past care years have sort of pushed the

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:13.160
<v Speaker 1>balmuzation to help bring more chip manufacturing back to America

0:17:13.320 --> 0:17:16.680
<v Speaker 1>and to make sure that the more advanced chips are

0:17:16.760 --> 0:17:21.040
<v Speaker 1>made on US oil tabby. My understanding is t SMC

0:17:21.160 --> 0:17:23.840
<v Speaker 1>are gonna be holding a pretty big party when they

0:17:24.160 --> 0:17:26.400
<v Speaker 1>unveil this plan, and that the President will be going.

0:17:26.440 --> 0:17:30.480
<v Speaker 1>What are the details? Yes, So President Biden and Secretary

0:17:30.520 --> 0:17:34.119
<v Speaker 1>of Commerce Jena Ramondo will be attending the so called

0:17:34.320 --> 0:17:38.000
<v Speaker 1>toy in ceremony next two day in Arizona. And this

0:17:38.119 --> 0:17:42.760
<v Speaker 1>ceremony is to celebrate a key construction milestone or for

0:17:42.960 --> 0:17:46.520
<v Speaker 1>t smc s first advanced plant in the US, and

0:17:46.600 --> 0:17:50.000
<v Speaker 1>in attendance will also be uh ND CEO or Lisa

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:54.399
<v Speaker 1>su and and media chief Jensen Huang and Apple's chief

0:17:54.440 --> 0:17:58.240
<v Speaker 1>executive Tim Cook. Uh is also a schedule to attend

0:17:58.280 --> 0:18:04.400
<v Speaker 1>the event next Tuesday. For nanometer technology, let's dig into

0:18:04.400 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 1>the technology. Why do we care if it's five nanometer

0:18:08.040 --> 0:18:10.440
<v Speaker 1>or four nanime? So why is that important for t

0:18:10.640 --> 0:18:15.080
<v Speaker 1>SMCS customers. Actually, it is also whatha important for the

0:18:15.440 --> 0:18:19.600
<v Speaker 1>administration because with the fifty Building and Chips Act, the

0:18:19.680 --> 0:18:23.880
<v Speaker 1>administration is hoping that the latest, the most cutting edge

0:18:24.480 --> 0:18:27.920
<v Speaker 1>chips will be made in the US eventually. So right

0:18:27.960 --> 0:18:31.160
<v Speaker 1>now the US is sort of like falling behind Asia

0:18:31.400 --> 0:18:34.800
<v Speaker 1>one generational, two generations at least when it comes to

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:39.720
<v Speaker 1>a chip manifacting technologies. But the Bandministration in the hope

0:18:39.760 --> 0:18:43.280
<v Speaker 1>to uh prevent future disruptions and to make sure that

0:18:43.320 --> 0:18:46.560
<v Speaker 1>the America will stay ahead in this competition with China

0:18:46.760 --> 0:18:50.120
<v Speaker 1>and the technology FUNCD So eventually, I mean, what kind

0:18:50.119 --> 0:18:52.560
<v Speaker 1>of technology is that the chip makers will be able

0:18:52.600 --> 0:18:56.800
<v Speaker 1>to offer us? Soil is so from uh most importance

0:18:56.840 --> 0:19:01.359
<v Speaker 1>for the government, not and not just for American companies.

0:19:02.200 --> 0:19:06.520
<v Speaker 1>This whole story is about expanding manufacturing capacity in the

0:19:06.600 --> 0:19:09.399
<v Speaker 1>United States right on shoring. Who are some of the

0:19:09.400 --> 0:19:12.760
<v Speaker 1>biggest names in the world of semiconductors that rely on

0:19:12.840 --> 0:19:17.280
<v Speaker 1>t SMC. So companies that rely on t SMC in

0:19:17.320 --> 0:19:21.760
<v Speaker 1>the US include the Apple and d N Media and

0:19:21.800 --> 0:19:26.240
<v Speaker 1>also a Qualcom and Alison Timer Intel Whila it makes

0:19:26.280 --> 0:19:29.000
<v Speaker 1>its own chips. Also, what relies on our t SMC

0:19:29.200 --> 0:19:32.680
<v Speaker 1>on some of its production, so t s m C

0:19:32.800 --> 0:19:37.400
<v Speaker 1>actually will also announced next Tuesday that it is committed

0:19:37.520 --> 0:19:41.240
<v Speaker 1>to build a second plant in Arizona to make even

0:19:41.280 --> 0:19:47.200
<v Speaker 1>more advanced three nelometer chips to help American companies. Okay,

0:19:47.200 --> 0:19:58.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg's deady, we're great reporting, Thank you very much. Time

0:19:58.840 --> 0:20:02.320
<v Speaker 1>now for talking tech layoffs in the tech industry still

0:20:02.359 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 1>in the headline. Serious XM is the latest to announce

0:20:05.600 --> 0:20:09.159
<v Speaker 1>job cuts in response to faltering revenue growth. Sales at

0:20:09.200 --> 0:20:11.800
<v Speaker 1>Serious grew three point seven in the third quarter, but

0:20:11.960 --> 0:20:15.720
<v Speaker 1>analysts now forecast more modest growth, just one percent in

0:20:15.720 --> 0:20:19.520
<v Speaker 1>the current period. All this comes as consultancy firm Challenger

0:20:19.600 --> 0:20:22.800
<v Speaker 1>Gray and Christmas says. While job cuts are announced across

0:20:22.840 --> 0:20:25.920
<v Speaker 1>the US, the tech sector was hit particularly hard. Of

0:20:26.000 --> 0:20:28.800
<v Speaker 1>the nearly seventy seven thousand jobs that announced to be

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:32.400
<v Speaker 1>cut in November, around fifty three thousand came from tech

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:36.680
<v Speaker 1>no surprise therefore, the West Coast was hit especially hard.

0:20:36.920 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 1>But that's not just in the US. This is a

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:43.159
<v Speaker 1>global story. Over in Ireland, for instance, tech companies ranging

0:20:43.200 --> 0:20:47.920
<v Speaker 1>from Twitter, Intel, Stripe or Meta have all been acting jobs.

0:20:47.920 --> 0:20:50.920
<v Speaker 1>Such layoffs, of course, have raised concerns with the European

0:20:50.920 --> 0:20:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Commission about tech companies and what they plan to do next,

0:20:55.000 --> 0:20:58.720
<v Speaker 1>particularly those that are caught up in the narrative around

0:20:59.040 --> 0:21:03.400
<v Speaker 1>privacy rule. Definitely one to watch. Go forward now stick

0:21:03.400 --> 0:21:05.159
<v Speaker 1>with us. Coming up on the show, we're going to

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:10.920
<v Speaker 1>speak to the CFO of Visa. Important spending, spending, spending,

0:21:10.960 --> 0:21:13.520
<v Speaker 1>credit cards. This is not one that you're going to

0:21:13.600 --> 0:21:16.480
<v Speaker 1>want to miss. Why holiday season and we want to

0:21:16.600 --> 0:21:19.080
<v Speaker 1>lend into what's going on that's fast and probably the

0:21:19.160 --> 0:21:59.280
<v Speaker 1>Visa CFO. Coming up next, this is Bloomberg Welcome back

0:21:59.280 --> 0:22:02.480
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg Chnology. I'm at loveloaw in San Francisco. Now.

0:22:02.600 --> 0:22:05.679
<v Speaker 1>Online spending is up nine percent this year compared to

0:22:06.440 --> 0:22:09.560
<v Speaker 1>one and Cyber Monday's record eleven point three billion dollars

0:22:09.800 --> 0:22:14.480
<v Speaker 1>in sales per Adobe show signs the consumer remains resilient

0:22:14.560 --> 0:22:17.280
<v Speaker 1>in an economic downturn. I've got just the guests for this.

0:22:17.359 --> 0:22:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Let's discussed with Visa's chief financial officer of Vascent, probably

0:22:20.920 --> 0:22:22.720
<v Speaker 1>Vass and thank you for coming on the program. It's

0:22:22.720 --> 0:22:26.439
<v Speaker 1>good to see you. Your assessment. Where do things stand?

0:22:26.560 --> 0:22:29.719
<v Speaker 1>You know we're entering kind of the backstages of this

0:22:29.760 --> 0:22:37.600
<v Speaker 1>holiday shopping period. What signs of visa seeing about consumer activity. Thanks. Yeah, Yes,

0:22:37.640 --> 0:22:40.480
<v Speaker 1>you use the word resilient, and I'd say that's the

0:22:41.119 --> 0:22:45.119
<v Speaker 1>that's probably the best adjective to use to describe the

0:22:45.160 --> 0:22:47.600
<v Speaker 1>state of the U. S consumer. You know, you've seen

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:51.840
<v Speaker 1>consumer spending state remarkably stable all year. You know, we

0:22:51.960 --> 0:22:55.280
<v Speaker 1>like to compare things to pandemic to get a clean look,

0:22:55.600 --> 0:22:59.760
<v Speaker 1>and it's amazing how stable spending. Husband, we're about forty

0:22:59.800 --> 0:23:04.240
<v Speaker 1>five forty ahead almost on a day by day, week

0:23:04.280 --> 0:23:07.080
<v Speaker 1>by week basis, And in fact, we just released numbers

0:23:07.080 --> 0:23:09.440
<v Speaker 1>through the twenty one November, and in the first three

0:23:09.480 --> 0:23:12.680
<v Speaker 1>weeks in November, just leading into the holiday period, we

0:23:12.680 --> 0:23:18.840
<v Speaker 1>were up roughly that from up about nine over last year,

0:23:19.560 --> 0:23:23.800
<v Speaker 1>and then holiday week twenty one to seven was roughly

0:23:23.840 --> 0:23:27.400
<v Speaker 1>in line on a ear over year basis, also high

0:23:27.440 --> 0:23:31.679
<v Speaker 1>single digits. We can't yet compared to because Thanksgiving was

0:23:32.200 --> 0:23:37.680
<v Speaker 1>later in so remarkable stability, remarkable resilience. I think that's

0:23:37.680 --> 0:23:42.000
<v Speaker 1>the best way to describe the US consumer right now.

0:23:42.040 --> 0:23:45.880
<v Speaker 1>We were a bit concerned with credit. We're talking out

0:23:45.920 --> 0:23:48.159
<v Speaker 1>of course, about the the impact of higher rates on

0:23:48.240 --> 0:23:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the consumer, and we're also talking a lot about buy now,

0:23:51.119 --> 0:23:54.159
<v Speaker 1>pay later. Do you have any sense of the split

0:23:54.240 --> 0:23:58.399
<v Speaker 1>on consumer spend between debit credit. What risks are the

0:23:58.440 --> 0:24:03.399
<v Speaker 1>consumer taking right now? Well, you know, it's been roughly

0:24:03.440 --> 0:24:06.880
<v Speaker 1>the same most of the year. Debt has been very

0:24:06.920 --> 0:24:12.520
<v Speaker 1>strong relative to even in November, devitt was up almost

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:17.320
<v Speaker 1>fifty over which is well about the pre COVID trend line.

0:24:17.359 --> 0:24:20.679
<v Speaker 1>So debt has been very resilient and credit has come

0:24:20.720 --> 0:24:23.600
<v Speaker 1>back in a very nice way. Credit was up thirty

0:24:23.840 --> 0:24:26.440
<v Speaker 1>percent or thirty eight percent over twenty nineteen. Both were

0:24:26.520 --> 0:24:31.560
<v Speaker 1>up high single digits over last year. So essentially, you know,

0:24:32.520 --> 0:24:36.679
<v Speaker 1>there's no sense of any consumer stress on the credit side.

0:24:36.960 --> 0:24:40.680
<v Speaker 1>Um debt has real stayed resilient, even has credit has

0:24:40.720 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 1>come back. All in all, you know, consumer spending has

0:24:44.800 --> 0:24:49.080
<v Speaker 1>stayed generally the same. It's changed a lot below the surface.

0:24:49.320 --> 0:24:52.960
<v Speaker 1>People are buying different things. People have adjusted to inflation

0:24:53.040 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 1>and so on. People are buying more services than goods,

0:24:56.000 --> 0:24:59.920
<v Speaker 1>more experiences, you know, than products, and there have been

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:02.760
<v Speaker 1>some changes in what people buy as a result of inflation.

0:25:03.080 --> 0:25:05.760
<v Speaker 1>But the aggregate level of spending, whether it's debit or credit,

0:25:05.800 --> 0:25:11.000
<v Speaker 1>remains very healthy. We maybe don't think of Visa as

0:25:11.040 --> 0:25:13.520
<v Speaker 1>a technology company, but if you think about it, visas

0:25:13.640 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 1>very much a technology company. My understanding is you have

0:25:17.880 --> 0:25:21.480
<v Speaker 1>a new boss, how is that going? What is what

0:25:21.640 --> 0:25:26.680
<v Speaker 1>is the three version of VISA look like? Well, hopefully

0:25:26.680 --> 0:25:29.520
<v Speaker 1>more of the same. We've had a good run, um.

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:31.879
<v Speaker 1>You know, we we had a good year in fiscal

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 1>year twenty two. Our revenues were up well over twenty

0:25:35.119 --> 0:25:39.880
<v Speaker 1>our profits are up well over You know, Ryan McNerney,

0:25:39.960 --> 0:25:43.359
<v Speaker 1>our new CEO, has been here a decade. He and

0:25:43.400 --> 0:25:46.440
<v Speaker 1>I I've worked together for a very long time. We're

0:25:46.440 --> 0:25:49.800
<v Speaker 1>all very sad to see our level was beloved within

0:25:49.880 --> 0:25:54.879
<v Speaker 1>the company. UM, but this was all very planned and expected. UM,

0:25:54.960 --> 0:25:59.040
<v Speaker 1>and our strategy remains the same. We have great momentum

0:25:59.040 --> 0:26:02.320
<v Speaker 1>on multiple fronts. We have tremendous growth in our core

0:26:02.400 --> 0:26:07.040
<v Speaker 1>consumer payments business. We have some significant opportunities in two

0:26:07.080 --> 0:26:10.440
<v Speaker 1>new vectors of growth, what we call new flows that

0:26:10.520 --> 0:26:13.760
<v Speaker 1>gets us into new use cases, UM, you know, like

0:26:14.160 --> 0:26:18.239
<v Speaker 1>person to person peter p like cross border remittances, like

0:26:18.400 --> 0:26:21.920
<v Speaker 1>businesses paying consumers, as well as in value added services.

0:26:22.000 --> 0:26:24.560
<v Speaker 1>So I think you should expect to see more to

0:26:24.640 --> 0:26:27.679
<v Speaker 1>the same, and we feel very good about you know

0:26:27.800 --> 0:26:32.840
<v Speaker 1>what's ahead of us and your new boss. Um, you

0:26:32.880 --> 0:26:35.320
<v Speaker 1>should have a mom one of these days and and

0:26:35.320 --> 0:26:38.399
<v Speaker 1>and see for yourself. Ryan is uh, you know, a

0:26:38.480 --> 0:26:43.640
<v Speaker 1>great guy. He is a you know, smart strategic He's

0:26:43.680 --> 0:26:46.679
<v Speaker 1>deeply knowledgeable about the business. He's very well known to

0:26:46.720 --> 0:26:50.600
<v Speaker 1>our clients around the world. Um, I think you know

0:26:50.760 --> 0:26:52.919
<v Speaker 1>we won't miss a beat, and of course Ryan will

0:26:53.080 --> 0:26:56.040
<v Speaker 1>set a new agenda for the future. I've got to

0:26:56.080 --> 0:26:59.920
<v Speaker 1>ask you about f t X and the historic relate

0:27:00.040 --> 0:27:03.040
<v Speaker 1>and ship between Visa and f t X. You had

0:27:03.040 --> 0:27:07.000
<v Speaker 1>a debit card partnership. My understanding is you've severed all

0:27:07.080 --> 0:27:10.200
<v Speaker 1>ties with f t X in any affiliation with sanbanger

0:27:10.240 --> 0:27:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Free and f t X. But could you explain to

0:27:12.680 --> 0:27:16.199
<v Speaker 1>us where that stands to clarify, But also how did

0:27:16.280 --> 0:27:18.720
<v Speaker 1>f t X get to that stage of relationship with

0:27:18.840 --> 0:27:23.560
<v Speaker 1>you given what we know now? Well, you know, we

0:27:23.560 --> 0:27:26.040
<v Speaker 1>we do business with a lot of partners. We do

0:27:26.119 --> 0:27:29.560
<v Speaker 1>the best we can to make sure we understand, you know,

0:27:29.640 --> 0:27:33.200
<v Speaker 1>how they're doing business. Like a lot of other people

0:27:33.320 --> 0:27:36.160
<v Speaker 1>looking at ft X from the outside, we certainly didn't

0:27:36.200 --> 0:27:38.960
<v Speaker 1>have the knowledge we now have about what was going on.

0:27:39.520 --> 0:27:41.639
<v Speaker 1>You know, our viewers, we don't have a position on

0:27:41.680 --> 0:27:44.520
<v Speaker 1>cryptocurrencies per se, whether they're a good thing or a

0:27:44.560 --> 0:27:47.200
<v Speaker 1>bad thing or how much bitcoin should be worth or not.

0:27:47.840 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 1>Our job is to facilitate what people want to buy,

0:27:51.000 --> 0:27:53.360
<v Speaker 1>as long as it's legal and as long as it's

0:27:53.359 --> 0:27:56.720
<v Speaker 1>in compliance with the regulation, and all indications were that

0:27:56.840 --> 0:28:00.960
<v Speaker 1>fd X was in compliance and all regulations. Buying bitcoin

0:28:01.119 --> 0:28:05.359
<v Speaker 1>or other cryptocurrencies is legal. We will enable people to

0:28:05.440 --> 0:28:09.679
<v Speaker 1>do things that are both legal and in compliance and regulations. Clearly,

0:28:09.800 --> 0:28:12.240
<v Speaker 1>we are as surprised as everybody else has been about

0:28:12.560 --> 0:28:14.720
<v Speaker 1>what was really going on in ft X. We no

0:28:14.800 --> 0:28:17.320
<v Speaker 1>longer have a relationship with them. We really had no

0:28:17.480 --> 0:28:21.800
<v Speaker 1>financial exposure to them. We were primarily enabling people to

0:28:21.960 --> 0:28:26.959
<v Speaker 1>buy and sell uh, you know, cryptocurrencies if they wanted to,

0:28:27.200 --> 0:28:29.960
<v Speaker 1>you know, buy things on ft X, much alike we

0:28:30.000 --> 0:28:33.400
<v Speaker 1>would do with any other exchange. UM. In any case,

0:28:33.800 --> 0:28:37.200
<v Speaker 1>you know, clearly this has been an eye opener for everybody.

0:28:37.560 --> 0:28:40.680
<v Speaker 1>We will all step up our diligence uh and and

0:28:41.000 --> 0:28:44.480
<v Speaker 1>hopefully there will be further regular tary actions that make

0:28:44.560 --> 0:28:49.360
<v Speaker 1>this all safer for all involved. Quickly, bass and broadly,

0:28:49.480 --> 0:28:52.600
<v Speaker 1>how has the crypto contagion or what we've seen in

0:28:52.640 --> 0:28:59.200
<v Speaker 1>the markets impacted visa well, our exposure to cryptos rather limited. Um,

0:28:59.240 --> 0:29:02.560
<v Speaker 1>you know, we have more sleep facilitators for people wanting

0:29:02.600 --> 0:29:06.720
<v Speaker 1>to buy cryptocurrencies, and that's a small part of our business. Uh.

0:29:06.760 --> 0:29:10.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, we have you know, some amount of card

0:29:10.600 --> 0:29:14.840
<v Speaker 1>issuance by crypto partners, some of whom may not survive,

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:19.000
<v Speaker 1>some of whom may may slow down some of their activities.

0:29:19.000 --> 0:29:21.840
<v Speaker 1>So it might slow things down in general. But all

0:29:21.840 --> 0:29:25.640
<v Speaker 1>in all, our exposure directly to the whole crypto I

0:29:25.680 --> 0:29:30.560
<v Speaker 1>guess economy is fairly limited. Now. We are long term,

0:29:30.600 --> 0:29:33.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, remain of the view that blockchain is a

0:29:33.240 --> 0:29:36.720
<v Speaker 1>significant technology. There will be things happening. We will remain

0:29:36.760 --> 0:29:41.080
<v Speaker 1>engaged with blockchains, with stable coins like us DC and others.

0:29:41.600 --> 0:29:45.840
<v Speaker 1>Or we will obviously monitor the situation very closely, but

0:29:46.320 --> 0:29:48.959
<v Speaker 1>you know, I wouldn't say it has much impact on

0:29:49.080 --> 0:29:52.920
<v Speaker 1>us UM at this point in time. Visus CFO best

0:29:53.000 --> 0:29:56.479
<v Speaker 1>and probably thank you very much. Thank you. Meanwhile, shares

0:29:56.560 --> 0:30:00.280
<v Speaker 1>of Salesforce down Thursday after the company gave and now look,

0:30:00.480 --> 0:30:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the analyst says, reflects a weak economic environment. It also

0:30:04.280 --> 0:30:08.880
<v Speaker 1>announced the exit of co CEO Brett Taylor next month,

0:30:09.000 --> 0:30:12.760
<v Speaker 1>leaving Mark Benioff at the helm. Blame Bug's Brady Force

0:30:13.160 --> 0:30:17.280
<v Speaker 1>covers sales Force. Brody A pretty simple question to start.

0:30:18.000 --> 0:30:21.480
<v Speaker 1>This is the second time a co CEO has left

0:30:21.520 --> 0:30:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Sales Force in recent history. Why that's the million dollar

0:30:26.760 --> 0:30:29.320
<v Speaker 1>question right now? Right, I mean, Mirke Berniop has been

0:30:29.360 --> 0:30:31.840
<v Speaker 1>in control of this company for a very long time.

0:30:32.400 --> 0:30:34.920
<v Speaker 1>There have been multiple moments where it appears that he

0:30:34.960 --> 0:30:38.040
<v Speaker 1>had found his successor. He has had multiple mentees that

0:30:38.120 --> 0:30:43.680
<v Speaker 1>were very public, very personal, um, and they have gone.

0:30:43.720 --> 0:30:46.120
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it's difficult to run a company, it's difficult

0:30:46.160 --> 0:30:50.239
<v Speaker 1>to find a successor, but specifically here it's been an issue, right,

0:30:50.240 --> 0:30:52.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean, this is the second co CEO to depart

0:30:52.680 --> 0:30:55.719
<v Speaker 1>in about three years. UM. So right now there are

0:30:55.720 --> 0:30:58.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of questions about what this means for you know,

0:30:58.680 --> 0:31:01.960
<v Speaker 1>a company that looking for a successor eventually, not this

0:31:02.080 --> 0:31:05.760
<v Speaker 1>second but in the in the future. What's interesting, I

0:31:05.800 --> 0:31:08.239
<v Speaker 1>guess is now the forward looking question what does this

0:31:08.280 --> 0:31:11.120
<v Speaker 1>mean for Salesforce and what does it mean for Benniff.

0:31:11.160 --> 0:31:15.040
<v Speaker 1>Does Mark Benioff become soul CEO again? For example? Currently, Yeah,

0:31:15.040 --> 0:31:17.360
<v Speaker 1>the planet is that it becomes Soul CEO. A lot

0:31:17.400 --> 0:31:19.760
<v Speaker 1>of folks have asked him, so do you now look

0:31:19.800 --> 0:31:23.360
<v Speaker 1>for another successor? He didn't quite answer that question directly,

0:31:23.480 --> 0:31:26.200
<v Speaker 1>But what we do know this comes at a difficult

0:31:26.240 --> 0:31:28.680
<v Speaker 1>time for Salesforce. I mean, their growth is at the

0:31:28.760 --> 0:31:32.040
<v Speaker 1>slowest it's been since I p o UM. They're under

0:31:32.120 --> 0:31:36.640
<v Speaker 1>pressure from activist investors to improve profitability, and they're experiencing

0:31:36.640 --> 0:31:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the same difficult market everybody in the industry is. And

0:31:39.720 --> 0:31:42.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean Bratt was seen as a very even hand,

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:45.800
<v Speaker 1>someone that kind of helped the company be more efficient,

0:31:46.120 --> 0:31:48.360
<v Speaker 1>kind of operate in a good way, and so losing

0:31:48.440 --> 0:31:51.360
<v Speaker 1>him it's it's a bad time. Most people would say,

0:31:52.080 --> 0:32:05.240
<v Speaker 1>all right, blame bugs, Brady Forward, thank you. This is

0:32:05.240 --> 0:32:08.760
<v Speaker 1>a setback for crypto. But there's an inevitability that digital

0:32:08.800 --> 0:32:10.960
<v Speaker 1>assets are gonna be part of our future, and we're

0:32:10.960 --> 0:32:12.880
<v Speaker 1>going to make that better. We are going to lean

0:32:12.920 --> 0:32:15.080
<v Speaker 1>into the opportunity set that we see. There are a

0:32:15.120 --> 0:32:17.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of cheap assets right now, there'll be a lot

0:32:17.320 --> 0:32:20.520
<v Speaker 1>of distressed assets. We're going to build for where they

0:32:20.520 --> 0:32:22.320
<v Speaker 1>think we think the puck will be in two years.

0:32:23.680 --> 0:32:27.160
<v Speaker 1>That was Galaxy Digital's Mike Novegrats earlier on bloom Doug

0:32:27.240 --> 0:32:30.360
<v Speaker 1>TV as Sam Bank and Freed's work to create trust

0:32:30.720 --> 0:32:33.400
<v Speaker 1>in the crypto ecosystem has been hurt for f t X,

0:32:33.440 --> 0:32:36.440
<v Speaker 1>but also for his rivals let's bring in d Y

0:32:36.560 --> 0:32:41.760
<v Speaker 1>d X founder and CEO Antonio Giuliano, your derivatives exchange,

0:32:41.840 --> 0:32:44.600
<v Speaker 1>so its activity triple in the wake of the f

0:32:44.680 --> 0:32:47.320
<v Speaker 1>t X implosion, right, I guess the question to start

0:32:47.400 --> 0:32:51.560
<v Speaker 1>with is this people shorting crypto? What is the behavior there?

0:32:52.840 --> 0:32:55.720
<v Speaker 1>So I think the biggest thing is somewhat of a

0:32:55.960 --> 0:33:00.880
<v Speaker 1>migration from centralized exchanges like an apt x to decentralized

0:33:00.920 --> 0:33:04.280
<v Speaker 1>exchanges like d I d X, unit slap and others.

0:33:04.720 --> 0:33:06.960
<v Speaker 1>At d I d X, we're proud to be one

0:33:07.000 --> 0:33:11.600
<v Speaker 1>of the leading decentralized exchanges. Decentralized exchanges have become a

0:33:11.600 --> 0:33:15.280
<v Speaker 1>pretty significant part of the ecosystem over the past few years.

0:33:15.280 --> 0:33:18.280
<v Speaker 1>Currently over a billion dollars a day is traded on

0:33:18.360 --> 0:33:21.200
<v Speaker 1>d I d X. That's still a relatively small piece

0:33:21.240 --> 0:33:24.120
<v Speaker 1>of the pie in terms of the crypto markets overall.

0:33:24.560 --> 0:33:27.560
<v Speaker 1>But d I d X and other decentralized exchanges there's

0:33:27.560 --> 0:33:29.640
<v Speaker 1>something that's really new and I think have been growing

0:33:29.640 --> 0:33:31.560
<v Speaker 1>a lot in the past couple of years, and I

0:33:31.600 --> 0:33:34.440
<v Speaker 1>think what's recently happened with f t X just underscores

0:33:34.520 --> 0:33:38.360
<v Speaker 1>the need for what we're building. I think volumes have

0:33:38.840 --> 0:33:41.680
<v Speaker 1>been growing immensely in your space, right, but it's still

0:33:41.720 --> 0:33:47.560
<v Speaker 1>a frank a fraction of what's being put through centralized platforms.

0:33:47.680 --> 0:33:51.440
<v Speaker 1>When does that equation change, I think it's going to

0:33:51.520 --> 0:33:55.880
<v Speaker 1>take a long time. UM. Right now, decentralized exchanges like

0:33:55.960 --> 0:33:58.600
<v Speaker 1>d I, d X, unit, SLAP and others are roughly

0:33:58.680 --> 0:34:01.880
<v Speaker 1>five percent of the fire market when it comes to

0:34:02.000 --> 0:34:05.480
<v Speaker 1>overall crypto trading volume. And I think the thing we

0:34:05.520 --> 0:34:08.600
<v Speaker 1>have to remember about decentralized exchanges is they're very new.

0:34:08.719 --> 0:34:11.640
<v Speaker 1>They were just invented about five years ago or so,

0:34:12.040 --> 0:34:14.200
<v Speaker 1>and only in the past two years or so have

0:34:14.320 --> 0:34:17.719
<v Speaker 1>they become a significant portion of the crypto volume at all.

0:34:18.200 --> 0:34:20.239
<v Speaker 1>I think if you're asking the question, when do you

0:34:20.320 --> 0:34:24.160
<v Speaker 1>decentralized exchanges become bigger in terms of trading volume than

0:34:24.239 --> 0:34:27.720
<v Speaker 1>centralized exchanges on crypto, I think it's certainly a longer

0:34:27.840 --> 0:34:30.960
<v Speaker 1>term play. I like to tell my team UM and

0:34:31.040 --> 0:34:33.040
<v Speaker 1>everyone else, I think it will be about five to

0:34:33.120 --> 0:34:35.840
<v Speaker 1>ten years from now, UM, But it's certainly something that

0:34:35.880 --> 0:34:38.440
<v Speaker 1>we're building towards, and I think it's certainly in the

0:34:38.440 --> 0:34:42.320
<v Speaker 1>cars for the future. We started this segment talking about

0:34:42.360 --> 0:34:46.080
<v Speaker 1>Sam Bankman Freed and how he's been speaking publicly. You know,

0:34:46.160 --> 0:34:48.759
<v Speaker 1>he was trying to build trust in f t X,

0:34:48.880 --> 0:34:51.760
<v Speaker 1>that trust is damaged. I guess my question is you're

0:34:51.760 --> 0:34:55.120
<v Speaker 1>seeing more business, right, but why should anyone trust you

0:34:55.440 --> 0:34:59.640
<v Speaker 1>any more than trusting Sam Bankman Freed. I think the

0:34:59.640 --> 0:35:02.239
<v Speaker 1>beauty of it is you don't have to trust me um,

0:35:02.400 --> 0:35:05.040
<v Speaker 1>you can just trust the code. Really, how d Y

0:35:05.120 --> 0:35:08.560
<v Speaker 1>d X and other decentralized exchanges work is they're based

0:35:08.560 --> 0:35:11.799
<v Speaker 1>on code, not humans or intermediaries, and that's kind of

0:35:11.800 --> 0:35:14.440
<v Speaker 1>the magic of what we're building. You can look at

0:35:14.520 --> 0:35:17.640
<v Speaker 1>our open source smart contracts on ether scan, you can

0:35:17.680 --> 0:35:20.640
<v Speaker 1>read our audit reports, and you only have to trust those.

0:35:20.719 --> 0:35:22.960
<v Speaker 1>You don't have to trust me um. I don't even

0:35:22.960 --> 0:35:25.680
<v Speaker 1>have access to any of the funds, So something like

0:35:25.719 --> 0:35:29.160
<v Speaker 1>what happened on ft X is literally impossible to happen

0:35:29.680 --> 0:35:32.960
<v Speaker 1>on the well functioning decentralized exchange like d I d X.

0:35:33.760 --> 0:35:38.360
<v Speaker 1>One of the reasons that defile more specifically decentralized exchanges

0:35:38.800 --> 0:35:41.400
<v Speaker 1>a kind of not more mainstream for bigger players is

0:35:41.440 --> 0:35:44.280
<v Speaker 1>because of the compliance risks. Right, there's always a risk

0:35:44.400 --> 0:35:48.120
<v Speaker 1>of potential money laundering. How do you circumvent that issue?

0:35:49.560 --> 0:35:54.200
<v Speaker 1>So we run automated compliance checks on the protocol using

0:35:54.239 --> 0:35:56.920
<v Speaker 1>a lot of data that exists on the blockchain, and

0:35:57.000 --> 0:36:00.960
<v Speaker 1>we do this in partnership with third party vendor UM.

0:36:00.960 --> 0:36:03.880
<v Speaker 1>And I think the thing that's interesting about cryptocurrencies is

0:36:03.920 --> 0:36:06.080
<v Speaker 1>they're both in some ways more private and in some

0:36:06.120 --> 0:36:09.920
<v Speaker 1>ways more public than traditional finance. One of the beauties

0:36:09.960 --> 0:36:12.360
<v Speaker 1>of d I d X and a d centralized exchanges

0:36:12.520 --> 0:36:15.680
<v Speaker 1>is that everything that's going on is transparent, so you

0:36:15.719 --> 0:36:18.919
<v Speaker 1>can see the history of funds that every address has

0:36:19.040 --> 0:36:21.440
<v Speaker 1>used UM, and that's all data that can go into

0:36:21.520 --> 0:36:24.880
<v Speaker 1>creating a robust compliance solution, and that's one of the

0:36:24.880 --> 0:36:28.560
<v Speaker 1>things we're also pushing forwards. All right, d Y d

0:36:28.840 --> 0:36:33.160
<v Speaker 1>X founder and CEO Antonio Giuliano, thank you. Now coming up,

0:36:33.239 --> 0:36:37.800
<v Speaker 1>Elon Musk's lofty promises with human implant technology goes viral.

0:36:38.440 --> 0:36:55.720
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg now going viral today. A big promise

0:36:55.800 --> 0:36:59.040
<v Speaker 1>as well hopes from Elon Musk, set out at Wednesday's

0:36:59.080 --> 0:37:02.640
<v Speaker 1>newer Link event. Musk says neural Links ready to start

0:37:02.680 --> 0:37:06.520
<v Speaker 1>putting its brain implant into human patients within six months.

0:37:06.560 --> 0:37:10.200
<v Speaker 1>The brain computer interface aims are allowing a person with

0:37:10.320 --> 0:37:15.000
<v Speaker 1>a debilitating condition to communicate via their thoughts. Musque said

0:37:15.080 --> 0:37:18.359
<v Speaker 1>that Neuralink is also developing implants that can go into

0:37:18.400 --> 0:37:23.719
<v Speaker 1>the spinal cord to possibly restore movement from paralysis. Bloomberg

0:37:23.880 --> 0:37:27.840
<v Speaker 1>Sarah McBride covered the event for US. The event exciting

0:37:28.239 --> 0:37:32.239
<v Speaker 1>a classic Elon Musk on stage affair. That's a good one.

0:37:32.440 --> 0:37:34.759
<v Speaker 1>What were the big takeaways? Well, for me, I thought

0:37:34.760 --> 0:37:36.880
<v Speaker 1>it was very interesting that while the rest of us

0:37:36.880 --> 0:37:40.000
<v Speaker 1>are still trying to just wrap our minds around implants

0:37:40.000 --> 0:37:42.879
<v Speaker 1>in the brain, he's already thinking about upgrades. He spent

0:37:43.000 --> 0:37:46.080
<v Speaker 1>a lot of time talking about how you wouldn't want

0:37:46.160 --> 0:37:49.000
<v Speaker 1>just an iPhone one if you could have the latest version,

0:37:49.120 --> 0:37:52.360
<v Speaker 1>and they're already thinking about if the first one doesn't

0:37:52.760 --> 0:37:55.279
<v Speaker 1>work as well, get another one, get a third, get

0:37:55.280 --> 0:37:57.319
<v Speaker 1>a fourth. I thought that was pretty We should point

0:37:57.320 --> 0:37:59.560
<v Speaker 1>out I guess that Elon Musk has a track record

0:37:59.640 --> 0:38:03.719
<v Speaker 1>of stating timelines and goals and predicted dates that he

0:38:03.760 --> 0:38:06.799
<v Speaker 1>doesn't meet. And actually, in the case of NEURALNK, that's

0:38:06.800 --> 0:38:10.760
<v Speaker 1>already true. Yes, it is. In fact, when he first

0:38:10.840 --> 0:38:13.400
<v Speaker 1>started talking about NEURALNK, he thought it would be in

0:38:13.640 --> 0:38:16.360
<v Speaker 1>humans by now. He gave an interview in two thousand

0:38:16.600 --> 0:38:21.800
<v Speaker 1>seventeen and said that by one would be in patients.

0:38:21.840 --> 0:38:25.960
<v Speaker 1>You know, wide adoption, and so that deadline has obviously slept,

0:38:26.000 --> 0:38:29.040
<v Speaker 1>and each year almost he gives another deadline that slept,

0:38:29.080 --> 0:38:32.520
<v Speaker 1>which is probably motivating to his staff. There was a

0:38:32.760 --> 0:38:38.680
<v Speaker 1>demonstration of a monkey essentially that was the recipient of

0:38:38.680 --> 0:38:42.799
<v Speaker 1>a neuralink implant, and they sort of demonstrated the use

0:38:42.840 --> 0:38:46.520
<v Speaker 1>of thoughts to translate that thought into a digital signal,

0:38:46.640 --> 0:38:50.600
<v Speaker 1>and Uh, it's astounding what they can do. The technology

0:38:50.640 --> 0:38:53.279
<v Speaker 1>seems to be there. The biggest block to it being

0:38:53.320 --> 0:38:57.319
<v Speaker 1>real appears to be the FDA. Let's say that's fair

0:38:57.880 --> 0:39:04.120
<v Speaker 1>because other similar less advanced implants have gone into people

0:39:04.400 --> 0:39:08.520
<v Speaker 1>in the past to treat things like epilepsy and Parkinson's.

0:39:08.600 --> 0:39:12.080
<v Speaker 1>The FDA obviously really wants to make sure that these

0:39:12.440 --> 0:39:15.760
<v Speaker 1>are safe, that they won't degrade over time in the brains.

0:39:15.840 --> 0:39:19.160
<v Speaker 1>So they have a lot of questions and he seemed

0:39:19.280 --> 0:39:22.480
<v Speaker 1>realistic about that. He did say the FDA had asked

0:39:22.520 --> 0:39:26.000
<v Speaker 1>some tough questions and that talks were progressing well. Yes,

0:39:26.920 --> 0:39:29.680
<v Speaker 1>is neural link on its own in this field? I

0:39:29.680 --> 0:39:32.720
<v Speaker 1>mean other people trying to do something similar right. Actually,

0:39:32.800 --> 0:39:34.840
<v Speaker 1>there are a lot of companies that are working on

0:39:34.920 --> 0:39:40.640
<v Speaker 1>different variations of this technology, including many founders from Neuralink

0:39:40.680 --> 0:39:42.960
<v Speaker 1>who have gone on to start I think they've left

0:39:43.040 --> 0:39:46.440
<v Speaker 1>the company, and exactly there was a big founding team.

0:39:46.560 --> 0:39:49.600
<v Speaker 1>Since the company several years old, many of those people

0:39:49.600 --> 0:39:54.959
<v Speaker 1>have moved on. They've started different companies. One founder, Max

0:39:55.000 --> 0:39:58.400
<v Speaker 1>hodak as this company Science that relies on the optical

0:39:58.480 --> 0:40:03.280
<v Speaker 1>nerve for implants. There's another one, Precision Neuroscience in New York.

0:40:03.719 --> 0:40:06.319
<v Speaker 1>And then there are some that don't have ties to

0:40:06.400 --> 0:40:10.400
<v Speaker 1>neural links, such as synchrome, which uses your blood vessels together.

0:40:10.400 --> 0:40:13.040
<v Speaker 1>And am I right in thinking very quickly? Elon Musk

0:40:13.160 --> 0:40:16.600
<v Speaker 1>said that he would get an implant himself. He said

0:40:16.640 --> 0:40:19.040
<v Speaker 1>that he also said he would be happy to put

0:40:19.080 --> 0:40:23.040
<v Speaker 1>one in one of his children. Okay, interesting, Well, this

0:40:23.080 --> 0:40:24.879
<v Speaker 1>is also the man that said he wouldn't get on

0:40:25.080 --> 0:40:27.680
<v Speaker 1>a SpaceX rocket until he was sure that he wouldn't

0:40:27.680 --> 0:40:31.160
<v Speaker 1>die on impact on his way to Mars. Bloomberg Sarah McBride,

0:40:31.480 --> 0:40:33.720
<v Speaker 1>thank you very much. That does it for this edition

0:40:33.760 --> 0:40:37.120
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Technology. Don't forget to check out our podcasts.

0:40:37.160 --> 0:40:39.359
<v Speaker 1>You can find it on the terminal as well as

0:40:39.360 --> 0:40:43.000
<v Speaker 1>online on Apple, Spotify and also on my Heart. It

0:40:43.080 --> 0:40:46.000
<v Speaker 1>has been a crazy week so far in the markets.

0:40:46.040 --> 0:40:49.320
<v Speaker 1>In crypto for Apple, for Elon Musk and his many,

0:40:49.480 --> 0:40:52.560
<v Speaker 1>many companies. Going into the end of the week, we're

0:40:52.560 --> 0:40:56.200
<v Speaker 1>expecting some pretty big news out of Twitter on progress

0:40:56.239 --> 0:40:59.839
<v Speaker 1>with verification. Is Twitter Blue coming? We're not quite sure,

0:41:00.120 --> 0:41:02.319
<v Speaker 1>but tune in either way. There's where you can find

0:41:02.360 --> 0:41:04.799
<v Speaker 1>the podcast, and of course you can find us on

0:41:04.880 --> 0:41:07.840
<v Speaker 1>all of our fantastic social media platforms, from here in

0:41:07.840 --> 0:41:10.520
<v Speaker 1>San Francisco to New York to around the world. This

0:41:10.560 --> 0:41:13.319
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Technology. This is Bloomberg