WEBVTT - Twilight of the Moa

0:00:04.559 --> 0:00:07.360
<v Speaker 1>Hi, everybody. It's Seth, the producer of Stuff to Blow

0:00:07.400 --> 0:00:11.360
<v Speaker 1>Your Mind. I'm here in March to just pop on

0:00:11.400 --> 0:00:14.440
<v Speaker 1>a quick note into this episode saying, hey, it's March,

0:00:15.320 --> 0:00:17.400
<v Speaker 1>and you know what that means. We're all recording from

0:00:17.440 --> 0:00:22.040
<v Speaker 1>our own homes, all separate, and all social distancing, so

0:00:22.160 --> 0:00:23.880
<v Speaker 1>that means the sound quality of this one is a

0:00:23.960 --> 0:00:27.240
<v Speaker 1>little strange. But just to let you know, each time

0:00:27.280 --> 0:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>we've been doing these home recordings, they've been getting better

0:00:30.120 --> 0:00:32.280
<v Speaker 1>and better and better. So I can guarantee you the

0:00:32.320 --> 0:00:33.960
<v Speaker 1>next one's going to sound a little better than this,

0:00:34.040 --> 0:00:35.559
<v Speaker 1>and the next one and after that's going to sound

0:00:35.560 --> 0:00:38.200
<v Speaker 1>a little bit better than that one, etcetera, etcetera. So

0:00:38.520 --> 0:00:40.760
<v Speaker 1>just so you know, this is all temporary and we'll

0:00:40.760 --> 0:00:43.360
<v Speaker 1>get back to our regular episodes as soon as we can,

0:00:43.560 --> 0:00:46.680
<v Speaker 1>sound quality wise. Thank you very much and enjoy the show.

0:00:49.960 --> 0:00:52.320
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to stot to Blow Your Mind, production of My

0:00:52.440 --> 0:01:01.680
<v Speaker 1>Heart Radio. Hey a, welcome to Stuff to Blow Your Mind.

0:01:01.840 --> 0:01:04.800
<v Speaker 1>My name is Robert Lamb and I'm Joe McCormick, and

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:08.080
<v Speaker 1>we're back. We're still social distancing. Now. There must have

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:11.600
<v Speaker 1>been a weird back and forth here because Thursday of

0:01:11.720 --> 0:01:14.920
<v Speaker 1>last week's episode we were broadcasting from our closet in

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:18.880
<v Speaker 1>our laundry room, right, But then Tuesday of this week's episode,

0:01:19.240 --> 0:01:21.680
<v Speaker 1>I think that was recorded in the studio before we

0:01:21.720 --> 0:01:24.720
<v Speaker 1>came home for the great retreat, that's right. And also

0:01:24.880 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 1>we record our vault episode intros about a month out,

0:01:28.280 --> 0:01:33.200
<v Speaker 1>so people might have noticed that as well. But this episode,

0:01:33.280 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 1>part two of our Look at the Moa Twilight of

0:01:36.560 --> 0:01:39.760
<v Speaker 1>the Moa we're calling it. This episode is recorded from

0:01:39.760 --> 0:01:43.039
<v Speaker 1>our respective closets in our homes. You're actually in a

0:01:43.080 --> 0:01:45.880
<v Speaker 1>closet now, as opposed to your your laundry room. Is

0:01:45.880 --> 0:01:48.760
<v Speaker 1>that correct? That's true. I decided to become a monster

0:01:48.840 --> 0:01:51.560
<v Speaker 1>in the closet. Uh, And I've got so I've got

0:01:51.560 --> 0:01:54.640
<v Speaker 1>the same talisman's that I had last time in order

0:01:54.680 --> 0:01:57.559
<v Speaker 1>to bring me good luck and watch over me while

0:01:57.720 --> 0:01:59.920
<v Speaker 1>making this recording. I've got tom Atkins from Night at

0:01:59.920 --> 0:02:02.320
<v Speaker 1>the Creeps. I've got my thor Christ. But this time

0:02:02.360 --> 0:02:06.040
<v Speaker 1>I also brought in an extremely tasteful novelty mug that

0:02:06.120 --> 0:02:09.359
<v Speaker 1>my wife found an East Tennessee thrift store, which is

0:02:09.360 --> 0:02:11.480
<v Speaker 1>great because I cannot bring this mug to the office.

0:02:11.560 --> 0:02:14.080
<v Speaker 1>I am sure I would get in trouble for that. Yeah,

0:02:14.320 --> 0:02:17.320
<v Speaker 1>the home office brings with it certain advantages, doesn't it?

0:02:17.840 --> 0:02:20.160
<v Speaker 1>For For me, I looked around the house. I would

0:02:20.160 --> 0:02:22.080
<v Speaker 1>have loved to have had a toy of a moa,

0:02:22.280 --> 0:02:26.320
<v Speaker 1>like a little plastic like Schleck moa, But sadly we

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:28.560
<v Speaker 1>do not have one, and it would be irresponsible for

0:02:28.600 --> 0:02:31.120
<v Speaker 1>me to even try and mail order one at the moment.

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:33.680
<v Speaker 1>So you have a plastic Shrek, No I have. I

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:37.600
<v Speaker 1>do have a plastic terror bird. So it's not accurate,

0:02:37.639 --> 0:02:41.160
<v Speaker 1>but it's it is still an extinct flightless bird. Uh

0:02:41.280 --> 0:02:42.800
<v Speaker 1>So I'm gonna set it right here next to my

0:02:42.840 --> 0:02:45.679
<v Speaker 1>microphone and it will it will serve as my mascot.

0:02:45.919 --> 0:02:49.080
<v Speaker 1>Well mayor pocket sized titles watch over us. So, so

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:51.160
<v Speaker 1>where do we leave off last time? All right? So

0:02:51.200 --> 0:02:53.720
<v Speaker 1>in our last episode, and if you didn't listen to it,

0:02:53.840 --> 0:02:56.200
<v Speaker 1>do go back and listen to that episode before this one.

0:02:56.480 --> 0:02:59.640
<v Speaker 1>In it, we discussed the evolution of flightless birds and

0:02:59.680 --> 0:03:04.200
<v Speaker 1>the eyes of the moa, nine species of large flightless

0:03:04.240 --> 0:03:07.959
<v Speaker 1>birds that evolved as the dominant vertebrates on the isolated

0:03:08.000 --> 0:03:11.080
<v Speaker 1>islands of what He's currently known as New Zealand. But

0:03:11.400 --> 0:03:14.000
<v Speaker 1>the rule of the moa did not last forever because

0:03:14.240 --> 0:03:18.200
<v Speaker 1>Homo sapiens arrived, and this episode will deal with the

0:03:18.240 --> 0:03:21.520
<v Speaker 1>subsequent extinction of the moa because you know what they say,

0:03:21.960 --> 0:03:27.960
<v Speaker 1>more humans moa problems. I wondered how you were going

0:03:28.000 --> 0:03:29.880
<v Speaker 1>to work that in, saying, you know, I had to

0:03:29.880 --> 0:03:33.840
<v Speaker 1>get to it eventually. Yeah, yeah, that's true for i'd

0:03:33.840 --> 0:03:37.640
<v Speaker 1>say every organism except us, right, except maybe like hathogens

0:03:37.680 --> 0:03:41.040
<v Speaker 1>that that prey upon us. Right. Yeah, it's certainly when

0:03:41.040 --> 0:03:45.680
<v Speaker 1>we're dealing with with megafauna um creatures of that nature.

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:50.000
<v Speaker 1>There's this is a tale of doom whenever humans enter

0:03:50.040 --> 0:03:52.720
<v Speaker 1>the equation, and we'll we'll point out some other examples

0:03:52.720 --> 0:03:54.960
<v Speaker 1>of that as we'd move along. No, wait a minute,

0:03:54.960 --> 0:03:57.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking of some more exceptions. We got rats too,

0:03:57.360 --> 0:04:01.600
<v Speaker 1>I mean rats were great for them. Rat will come up. Yeah,

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:04.119
<v Speaker 1>so so, yeah, a few exceptions there. But you don't

0:04:04.120 --> 0:04:06.560
<v Speaker 1>want to be a moa when humans show up, right,

0:04:07.200 --> 0:04:10.440
<v Speaker 1>So the rule of the moa was lengthy. They evolved

0:04:10.440 --> 0:04:13.920
<v Speaker 1>into the into these dominant positions in New Zealand, but

0:04:14.000 --> 0:04:17.400
<v Speaker 1>as we discussed on the show before, it can be

0:04:17.680 --> 0:04:21.560
<v Speaker 1>precarious at the top, certainly for apex predators, but also

0:04:21.640 --> 0:04:26.599
<v Speaker 1>from massive dominant herbivores, especially when something changes. Oh yeah,

0:04:26.680 --> 0:04:29.200
<v Speaker 1>we also talked about this in our episode. I believe

0:04:29.240 --> 0:04:33.240
<v Speaker 1>it was on the Leviattan or the Leviathan genus of

0:04:33.279 --> 0:04:36.560
<v Speaker 1>like the the ancient predatory sperm whale. That's right, yes,

0:04:36.880 --> 0:04:38.880
<v Speaker 1>where it's easy to look at a creature like that

0:04:39.120 --> 0:04:41.880
<v Speaker 1>or a creature like hosts eagle, which we discussed in

0:04:41.880 --> 0:04:44.280
<v Speaker 1>the last episode, to look at these creatures and think,

0:04:44.279 --> 0:04:47.400
<v Speaker 1>well that there's no taking that down. That's that's that's

0:04:47.440 --> 0:04:50.479
<v Speaker 1>a dominant organism. But it is, uh, you know, it

0:04:50.600 --> 0:04:53.719
<v Speaker 1>is the ruler, but it is it is it's thrown

0:04:53.839 --> 0:04:57.800
<v Speaker 1>rest upon a precarious pyramid of bones. Yeah, heavy lies

0:04:57.839 --> 0:05:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the crown exactly. So yeah, when something changes, it can

0:05:01.760 --> 0:05:06.279
<v Speaker 1>topple everything over. And in the thirteenth century c. I've

0:05:06.320 --> 0:05:09.120
<v Speaker 1>seen twelve a d c. As a potential date, a

0:05:09.200 --> 0:05:11.880
<v Speaker 1>major change arrived on the shores of New Zealand. And

0:05:11.880 --> 0:05:14.799
<v Speaker 1>that change came in the form of Homo sapiens. Uh.

0:05:14.880 --> 0:05:20.200
<v Speaker 1>The long world changing wave of human migration had finally

0:05:20.320 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 1>made its way to you know, near the bottom of

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:25.640
<v Speaker 1>the world, to this nation of the birds. And this

0:05:25.680 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 1>would have been what would come to be known as

0:05:28.440 --> 0:05:32.040
<v Speaker 1>the Mallory. Uh. These were uh, these settlers were a

0:05:32.360 --> 0:05:36.599
<v Speaker 1>Polynesian people who arrived in several waves uh in what

0:05:36.760 --> 0:05:39.320
<v Speaker 1>is now New Zealand. This is one of the later

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:44.040
<v Speaker 1>regions of planet Earth to be settled by humans. Absolutely

0:05:44.400 --> 0:05:48.320
<v Speaker 1>like these were some of the last in true pioneers

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:53.520
<v Speaker 1>heading into parts of the world, not not only parts

0:05:53.560 --> 0:05:55.440
<v Speaker 1>of the world that they had not been to before,

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:59.039
<v Speaker 1>but where no human had gone before. Um. You know,

0:05:59.240 --> 0:06:03.440
<v Speaker 1>the European colonists and explorers would only come in the

0:06:03.440 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 1>wake of these true pioneers. Now, Polynesian culture itself is

0:06:07.839 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 1>endlessly fascinating and I'd love to come back and deal

0:06:10.520 --> 0:06:13.680
<v Speaker 1>with some of the related topics on the show, such

0:06:13.720 --> 0:06:19.000
<v Speaker 1>as their amazing navigational abilities or the use of aquaculture

0:06:19.040 --> 0:06:22.320
<v Speaker 1>in the in the Hawaiian Islands. But essentially we're talking

0:06:22.360 --> 0:06:26.520
<v Speaker 1>about a long curving leg of human expansion that extends

0:06:26.800 --> 0:06:32.080
<v Speaker 1>from China through the Philippines, New Guinea, the Solomon Islands, Samoa, Tahiti,

0:06:32.400 --> 0:06:36.120
<v Speaker 1>uh Hawaii, Easter Island, and other islands in this broad

0:06:36.279 --> 0:06:39.840
<v Speaker 1>stretch of the ocean. Again, they were the Polynesians were

0:06:39.880 --> 0:06:44.120
<v Speaker 1>the last true pioneers of human expansion, and Polynesian expansion

0:06:44.160 --> 0:06:46.880
<v Speaker 1>took place over the course of thousands of years as well,

0:06:47.120 --> 0:06:49.680
<v Speaker 1>and the culture evolved along the way it took takes

0:06:49.680 --> 0:06:52.520
<v Speaker 1>on ends up taking on different forms in the locations

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:56.839
<v Speaker 1>where they land, often due to resulting isolation. Uh, you know,

0:06:56.880 --> 0:07:00.680
<v Speaker 1>because these are in many cases very far flung islands,

0:07:00.720 --> 0:07:03.160
<v Speaker 1>and and and sometimes we're talking about, you know, centuries

0:07:03.200 --> 0:07:08.120
<v Speaker 1>and centuries between people making it to one island versus another.

0:07:08.440 --> 0:07:11.720
<v Speaker 1>So New Zealand was discovered and colonized very late in

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:17.040
<v Speaker 1>human expansion, and when the archaic Mallory arrived, they encountered

0:07:17.080 --> 0:07:20.800
<v Speaker 1>the moa. Following this encounter, the nine species of moa

0:07:20.880 --> 0:07:24.320
<v Speaker 1>would scarcely last more than another century, and they were

0:07:24.360 --> 0:07:29.320
<v Speaker 1>extinct by fourtet. So let's get into what we're mainly

0:07:29.320 --> 0:07:33.000
<v Speaker 1>going to discuss in this episode, this this collision between

0:07:33.280 --> 0:07:36.000
<v Speaker 1>Homo sapiens and moa. And probably the best place to

0:07:36.040 --> 0:07:38.440
<v Speaker 1>start there is by talking about just the word moa.

0:07:39.040 --> 0:07:42.400
<v Speaker 1>Where does it come from? I was reading in Prodigious Birds,

0:07:42.480 --> 0:07:46.160
<v Speaker 1>MOA's and Moa Hunting in New Zealand by Athol Anderson,

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:50.480
<v Speaker 1>and the author shares that the earliest recorded use of

0:07:50.520 --> 0:07:55.480
<v Speaker 1>the word moa comes via Cornish missionary William Colenso who

0:07:55.520 --> 0:07:59.440
<v Speaker 1>in eighteen thirty eight heard that some Mallory described the

0:07:59.480 --> 0:08:03.600
<v Speaker 1>moa as a large bird, others as a large bird

0:08:03.640 --> 0:08:06.480
<v Speaker 1>with a face like that of a man who lived

0:08:06.520 --> 0:08:10.720
<v Speaker 1>in a mountain cavern that was guarded by two giant lizards. Wow.

0:08:11.200 --> 0:08:14.760
<v Speaker 1>This in other tales described the residents of Mount uh

0:08:14.880 --> 0:08:20.600
<v Speaker 1>Taranaki or Mount Egmonts described the very strange residents that

0:08:20.680 --> 0:08:24.760
<v Speaker 1>lived there, often taking the form of abnormal birds or lizards,

0:08:24.880 --> 0:08:28.840
<v Speaker 1>sometimes with human qualities. And this really lines up with

0:08:28.920 --> 0:08:31.600
<v Speaker 1>what we've talked about on the show before about sacred

0:08:31.640 --> 0:08:35.960
<v Speaker 1>mountains and holy mountains and the various myths that people

0:08:36.360 --> 0:08:39.559
<v Speaker 1>accumulate regarding the sorts of things you would find there,

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:42.760
<v Speaker 1>in the sorts of creatures that would populate those uh,

0:08:42.880 --> 0:08:46.240
<v Speaker 1>those mysterious cliffs up there. Yeah, there are a couple

0:08:46.280 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 1>of ways of looking at that. In our episode on

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:51.360
<v Speaker 1>the Sacred Mountains, I guess we did two of those episodes.

0:08:51.400 --> 0:08:53.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, one thing is we talked about the idea

0:08:53.400 --> 0:08:56.200
<v Speaker 1>that if you get really really high up there, there's

0:08:56.240 --> 0:08:59.679
<v Speaker 1>some evidence that people sometimes start, you know, experiencing psychosis

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:03.000
<v Speaker 1>or llucinations. Um, so, like that could be a source

0:09:03.040 --> 0:09:06.600
<v Speaker 1>of some supernatural beliefs in some cases. But but I'd

0:09:06.600 --> 0:09:09.880
<v Speaker 1>say probably the more prevalent issue is just that the

0:09:09.920 --> 0:09:13.199
<v Speaker 1>top of the mountain is inaccessible, so it is naturally

0:09:13.240 --> 0:09:16.079
<v Speaker 1>a place to put your mythical creatures at home in

0:09:16.240 --> 0:09:19.400
<v Speaker 1>You know that that is where they hide. Absolutely. Now

0:09:19.400 --> 0:09:21.280
<v Speaker 1>I know what some people are probably wondering here is

0:09:21.840 --> 0:09:25.920
<v Speaker 1>eight That sounds kind of late for the earliest recorded

0:09:26.040 --> 0:09:28.440
<v Speaker 1>use of the word moa. Yeah, so how long would

0:09:28.480 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the species have been extinct before the word appears in writing? Yeah? Yeah,

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:36.800
<v Speaker 1>it's uh. It seems a little confusing at first, right,

0:09:37.520 --> 0:09:42.480
<v Speaker 1>because first contact between Europeans and Maori occurred December eighteen,

0:09:42.679 --> 0:09:49.800
<v Speaker 1>sixteen forty two, with Able Tasman's Dutch East India Company expedition. Now, specifically,

0:09:49.880 --> 0:09:54.760
<v Speaker 1>Europeans had been asking the Maori about other giant creatures

0:09:54.760 --> 0:09:58.520
<v Speaker 1>recorded in their traditions since the seventeen seventies. In the

0:09:58.559 --> 0:10:02.559
<v Speaker 1>near two centuries at there was certainly communication and exchange

0:10:02.640 --> 0:10:07.960
<v Speaker 1>between Europeans and Maori, in addition to, of course colonial subjucation. UH.

0:10:08.000 --> 0:10:11.240
<v Speaker 1>Anderson discusses this uh in his book, and it points

0:10:11.240 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 1>out that earlier references to the moa might either have

0:10:15.720 --> 0:10:20.280
<v Speaker 1>not been recognized or not associated with the term moa. Itself,

0:10:20.360 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 1>so you know, descriptions of the animal might not have

0:10:22.559 --> 0:10:26.520
<v Speaker 1>been immediately tied with moa. For instance, there were accounts

0:10:26.520 --> 0:10:29.920
<v Speaker 1>of spirits covered in hair in the form of birds,

0:10:30.400 --> 0:10:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and there was talk of how a giant kiwi lived

0:10:33.800 --> 0:10:37.080
<v Speaker 1>in the mountains. Uh. And will again remind everyone that

0:10:37.320 --> 0:10:40.200
<v Speaker 1>the kiwi and the moa are not actually all that related.

0:10:40.600 --> 0:10:44.680
<v Speaker 1>But this, uh, this sort of discovery would have stemmed

0:10:44.720 --> 0:10:49.079
<v Speaker 1>from Earth, from general European interests in the extent kiwi.

0:10:49.280 --> 0:10:51.360
<v Speaker 1>So you know, they might have been asking about the kiwi,

0:10:51.559 --> 0:10:54.760
<v Speaker 1>and they would have been heard about myths of giant

0:10:54.840 --> 0:10:58.240
<v Speaker 1>birds that are in some way like a kiwi. That

0:10:58.400 --> 0:11:01.840
<v Speaker 1>is interesting. Yeah, the idea that that the concept could

0:11:01.880 --> 0:11:05.400
<v Speaker 1>persist over time, especially if you have like something that's

0:11:05.800 --> 0:11:10.520
<v Speaker 1>morphologically very similar but just like much smaller to refer to, right. Yeah,

0:11:10.559 --> 0:11:13.199
<v Speaker 1>And in all of this again we're just we're discussing

0:11:13.240 --> 0:11:17.600
<v Speaker 1>like European knowledge all of the moa, which is ultimately

0:11:17.640 --> 0:11:22.920
<v Speaker 1>tied to European knowledge and understanding of the mallory, which

0:11:22.960 --> 0:11:26.040
<v Speaker 1>of course is is a strained relationship, you know, to

0:11:26.040 --> 0:11:28.760
<v Speaker 1>say the least, because again you're talking about the the

0:11:28.760 --> 0:11:32.240
<v Speaker 1>indigenous people, the Mallory and you're talking about the the

0:11:32.360 --> 0:11:34.960
<v Speaker 1>colonial power that then arrives on their shore in the

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:38.120
<v Speaker 1>form of the Europeans. Anderson also points out that a

0:11:38.160 --> 0:11:42.720
<v Speaker 1>major factor might be that the Mallory conceptionalize the moa

0:11:42.800 --> 0:11:45.600
<v Speaker 1>as not being true birds but is just being is

0:11:45.640 --> 0:11:49.319
<v Speaker 1>being bird like, which Nights had a little confusing. But

0:11:49.360 --> 0:11:51.480
<v Speaker 1>then I think back to just some of the weird

0:11:51.520 --> 0:11:54.240
<v Speaker 1>things about the moa, you know, like that they the

0:11:54.280 --> 0:11:57.200
<v Speaker 1>thing that that the fact that they had no wings,

0:11:57.280 --> 0:12:01.480
<v Speaker 1>not even vestigial wings. They were just two limbed organisms. Um,

0:12:01.520 --> 0:12:05.760
<v Speaker 1>you can see why it might defy easy categorization. Likewise,

0:12:05.760 --> 0:12:09.160
<v Speaker 1>they're just the size of the larger species. Well sure,

0:12:09.160 --> 0:12:11.480
<v Speaker 1>I mean when we use the term bird now, I

0:12:11.480 --> 0:12:13.319
<v Speaker 1>think like you and I are going to be referring

0:12:13.400 --> 0:12:19.720
<v Speaker 1>to an evolutionary clade, uh that is defined by evolutionary relationships.

0:12:19.760 --> 0:12:22.360
<v Speaker 1>But if you're just categorizing animals that you see in

0:12:22.400 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 1>the world, what are the bases on which you form

0:12:25.800 --> 0:12:29.079
<v Speaker 1>your categories? Like a bird might well be understood as

0:12:29.200 --> 0:12:32.040
<v Speaker 1>something that flies. So if there's something that, look, this

0:12:32.160 --> 0:12:33.640
<v Speaker 1>is kind of like a bird, and that it has

0:12:33.640 --> 0:12:35.560
<v Speaker 1>a beak and all that, but it doesn't fly, it

0:12:35.600 --> 0:12:38.920
<v Speaker 1>doesn't meet your necessary criteria for what makes something a

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:43.040
<v Speaker 1>bird exactly. Yeah, and so the bones of the moa

0:12:43.120 --> 0:12:46.680
<v Speaker 1>were apparently not described by the Mallory as bird bones,

0:12:46.720 --> 0:12:50.160
<v Speaker 1>but they were described as moa bones. So here's a

0:12:50.240 --> 0:12:53.640
<v Speaker 1>here's a quote from from Anderson and all of this quote.

0:12:53.640 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 1>It is very difficult to document this point, but the

0:12:56.440 --> 0:13:01.160
<v Speaker 1>separation of dangerous mythological moa from large birds used as

0:13:01.200 --> 0:13:05.000
<v Speaker 1>food and easily hunted to extinction in Pollock's description, and

0:13:05.040 --> 0:13:08.800
<v Speaker 1>the lack of any comparable prosaic tradition about MOA's in

0:13:08.920 --> 0:13:13.200
<v Speaker 1>most of the moa stories collected by missionaries seems suggestive. Certainly,

0:13:13.520 --> 0:13:16.920
<v Speaker 1>it was the very lack of an unequivocal association between

0:13:16.920 --> 0:13:20.400
<v Speaker 1>the term moa and any straightforward account of large birds

0:13:20.480 --> 0:13:23.600
<v Speaker 1>hunted and eaten by maories which formed the main flaw

0:13:23.720 --> 0:13:27.760
<v Speaker 1>exploited throughout the long debate about what, if anything Maloris

0:13:27.800 --> 0:13:32.600
<v Speaker 1>had known about the dinner rithoforms. Oh, and the dinner eiforms.

0:13:32.640 --> 0:13:37.520
<v Speaker 1>That refers to the group to which the moa belong. Right, Yes, so,

0:13:37.800 --> 0:13:41.719
<v Speaker 1>well we'll ponder this dangerous versus easy to drive to

0:13:41.800 --> 0:13:45.120
<v Speaker 1>extinction question as we perceive, because I'm not entirely convinced

0:13:45.160 --> 0:13:48.080
<v Speaker 1>this species can't be both of these things, you know,

0:13:48.160 --> 0:13:51.720
<v Speaker 1>certainly when humans and the humans in question have tools, tactics,

0:13:51.800 --> 0:13:55.079
<v Speaker 1>and invasive species on their side. Oh sure. I mean,

0:13:56.679 --> 0:13:59.839
<v Speaker 1>some of the most dangerous creatures in a one on

0:14:00.040 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 1>in context are also some of the easiest to drive extinct.

0:14:03.360 --> 0:14:06.000
<v Speaker 1>I mean, if you just wanted to drive an animal extinct,

0:14:06.040 --> 0:14:08.199
<v Speaker 1>what would be like the easiest ones to do, Probably

0:14:08.240 --> 0:14:11.760
<v Speaker 1>like large carnivores, because there's already so few of them.

0:14:11.800 --> 0:14:14.480
<v Speaker 1>Of course, the moa were not carnivores like this, but yeah,

0:14:14.480 --> 0:14:17.920
<v Speaker 1>of course, like large animals generally being fewer in number

0:14:18.000 --> 0:14:21.400
<v Speaker 1>because of their energy requirements within the environment, would seem

0:14:21.440 --> 0:14:23.680
<v Speaker 1>to be easier to drive to extinction than if you

0:14:23.720 --> 0:14:26.120
<v Speaker 1>were trying to exterminate something that's very easy to kill,

0:14:26.240 --> 0:14:30.400
<v Speaker 1>like rats. Yeah, and again I think they the evidence

0:14:30.440 --> 0:14:33.160
<v Speaker 1>seems to indicate they would have been dangerous creatures because

0:14:33.160 --> 0:14:36.320
<v Speaker 1>these were big animals. Even the little bush moa was

0:14:36.640 --> 0:14:39.320
<v Speaker 1>four and a half feet tall. Now that's smaller than

0:14:39.360 --> 0:14:43.560
<v Speaker 1>an adult southern castlewary, which is generally five to six

0:14:43.560 --> 0:14:46.359
<v Speaker 1>ft taller one and a half to one point eight meters.

0:14:46.400 --> 0:14:49.240
<v Speaker 1>But if you see one, you would not mess with it, right, Yeah,

0:14:49.240 --> 0:14:53.080
<v Speaker 1>they're they're fierce creatures. So it seems like the larger

0:14:53.120 --> 0:14:56.440
<v Speaker 1>species of Moa especially would certainly be in a position

0:14:56.720 --> 0:14:58.880
<v Speaker 1>to put the hurt on an aggressor and do so

0:14:58.960 --> 0:15:01.120
<v Speaker 1>in a way that's in keeping with what we see

0:15:01.160 --> 0:15:05.480
<v Speaker 1>in in extant rattite species. But does that mean they

0:15:05.520 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 1>were a match for the humans that arrived on their shores. No,

0:15:08.520 --> 0:15:11.880
<v Speaker 1>because the archaic now we were a very skilled and

0:15:11.920 --> 0:15:17.160
<v Speaker 1>advanced people. They arrived in waves from Hawaiiki, this is

0:15:17.160 --> 0:15:21.280
<v Speaker 1>a mythical land that is usually identified as Tahiti by historians,

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:24.480
<v Speaker 1>and they were of course skilled sailors that arrived on

0:15:24.600 --> 0:15:29.200
<v Speaker 1>wooden vessels capable of traversing great distances at sea. For instance,

0:15:29.320 --> 0:15:32.840
<v Speaker 1>the distance between Tahiti and New Zealand is two thousand,

0:15:32.960 --> 0:15:35.920
<v Speaker 1>nine hundred and fifty miles or four thousand, seven hundred

0:15:36.000 --> 0:15:38.680
<v Speaker 1>forty seven kilometers. I mean, that's a long way to go,

0:15:39.360 --> 0:15:42.560
<v Speaker 1>even if you know exactly where you're going. But here

0:15:42.560 --> 0:15:46.040
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about like the settlement of a new, previously

0:15:46.120 --> 0:15:49.360
<v Speaker 1>unknown island, right, So yeah, I just I just really

0:15:49.360 --> 0:15:52.600
<v Speaker 1>want to drive home like the skilled nature of these

0:15:52.760 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 1>Homo sapiens that arrived um and what's more, they brought

0:15:56.640 --> 0:15:59.840
<v Speaker 1>with them both human cunning and human tool use. They

0:16:00.000 --> 0:16:03.680
<v Speaker 1>are masters of the club and the spear especially. They

0:16:03.680 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 1>also brought with them other animals, including a breed of

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:11.240
<v Speaker 1>domesticated Polynesian dog known as the curry, which, as with

0:16:11.280 --> 0:16:15.160
<v Speaker 1>other Polynesian dogs, did not bark, but apparently howl. They

0:16:15.240 --> 0:16:19.280
<v Speaker 1>also brought with them, quite by accident, the kiori, the

0:16:19.720 --> 0:16:23.200
<v Speaker 1>Polynesian rat um. Now the kori is still a pest

0:16:23.240 --> 0:16:26.280
<v Speaker 1>species in New Zealand because, as we know, once rats

0:16:26.520 --> 0:16:30.360
<v Speaker 1>become established anywhere, they're very difficult to get rid of.

0:16:30.760 --> 0:16:32.960
<v Speaker 1>The curry dog, on the other hand, has been extinct

0:16:33.040 --> 0:16:36.120
<v Speaker 1>since the arrival of Europeans, and we'll talk more about

0:16:36.120 --> 0:16:38.640
<v Speaker 1>that species in a minute. And they also brought with

0:16:38.680 --> 0:16:41.480
<v Speaker 1>them um plants as well, such as the sweet potato.

0:16:41.720 --> 0:16:44.040
<v Speaker 1>Well way, is there any thinking that the sweet potato

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:47.520
<v Speaker 1>could be involved in driving them oa extinct or I

0:16:47.600 --> 0:16:50.040
<v Speaker 1>am not. I have not read anything to suggest that,

0:16:50.360 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 1>but but I mean that kind of that sort of

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 1>thing is certainly possible. Right generally speaking, when you have

0:16:56.280 --> 0:17:00.200
<v Speaker 1>humans from a distant land show up and introduce into

0:17:00.240 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>the ecosystem not only their destructive selves, but also invasive organisms. Uh,

0:17:05.800 --> 0:17:08.920
<v Speaker 1>there's you know, you're just really upending the croc pie.

0:17:09.000 --> 0:17:11.920
<v Speaker 1>You know, you're really changing the chemistry of the whole

0:17:11.920 --> 0:17:15.080
<v Speaker 1>ecosystem around potentially. Oh yeah, well, actually, now that I

0:17:15.080 --> 0:17:16.840
<v Speaker 1>think about it, I could totally see how I'm not

0:17:16.880 --> 0:17:18.720
<v Speaker 1>saying this is the case here, but I could totally

0:17:18.720 --> 0:17:22.560
<v Speaker 1>see how something like the sweet potato could drive a

0:17:22.720 --> 0:17:25.640
<v Speaker 1>native species extinct. Because humans come, they bring with them

0:17:25.640 --> 0:17:28.840
<v Speaker 1>their crop staples. In order to plant those crops, they

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:33.359
<v Speaker 1>have to uh to establish agricultural zones that destroy natural ecosystem.

0:17:33.440 --> 0:17:35.399
<v Speaker 1>So yeah, I could see it. Again, not saying we

0:17:35.440 --> 0:17:38.400
<v Speaker 1>know that that happened here. All right, On that note,

0:17:38.480 --> 0:17:40.440
<v Speaker 1>let's take a quick break, and when we come back,

0:17:40.640 --> 0:17:44.640
<v Speaker 1>we will continue to discuss the collision between Homo sapiens

0:17:44.680 --> 0:17:50.280
<v Speaker 1>and the MOA. Than alright, we're back. So what do

0:17:50.359 --> 0:17:55.240
<v Speaker 1>you need as fresh colonists in a world like New Zealand. Well,

0:17:55.320 --> 0:17:58.480
<v Speaker 1>let's see classic hierarchy of needs. I'd say, first you

0:17:58.520 --> 0:18:01.840
<v Speaker 1>need you need fresh water, food, and shelter, probably right,

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:06.000
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, absolutely, Am I on the right track here? Yes? Yes,

0:18:06.240 --> 0:18:08.840
<v Speaker 1>But another need that I I didn't instantly think of,

0:18:08.920 --> 0:18:11.040
<v Speaker 1>And part of this is probably because I've never been

0:18:11.080 --> 0:18:13.639
<v Speaker 1>to New Zealand myself, so I don't have like the

0:18:13.920 --> 0:18:17.119
<v Speaker 1>bodily experience of this. But New Zealand can be quite cold,

0:18:17.840 --> 0:18:20.360
<v Speaker 1>so you know you're you're arriving in a new land,

0:18:20.400 --> 0:18:22.520
<v Speaker 1>but also a land where the temperatures dipped down a

0:18:22.520 --> 0:18:27.040
<v Speaker 1>bit more. Uh So the the Archaic Mallory, uh they

0:18:27.080 --> 0:18:30.040
<v Speaker 1>were fortunate and that they did bring within the coury dogs,

0:18:30.320 --> 0:18:33.240
<v Speaker 1>which helps solve some of these issues because the creatures

0:18:33.280 --> 0:18:37.600
<v Speaker 1>had many utalitarian uses. They could be eaten, their pelt

0:18:37.640 --> 0:18:40.280
<v Speaker 1>could be made into clothing, and other parts of its

0:18:40.280 --> 0:18:42.840
<v Speaker 1>body could be used for bits of clothing and tool

0:18:42.960 --> 0:18:45.920
<v Speaker 1>use and so forth. But beyond that, you know, when

0:18:45.920 --> 0:18:49.160
<v Speaker 1>they started exploring this new world, they very quickly would

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:52.240
<v Speaker 1>have discovered the Moa, and the Moa would be just

0:18:52.359 --> 0:18:55.680
<v Speaker 1>a gift of resources to these people. Now here's a

0:18:55.760 --> 0:18:58.680
<v Speaker 1>question that researchers and historians have have pondered over the years.

0:18:58.720 --> 0:19:03.040
<v Speaker 1>So what sore of Moa population did the Archaic Mallory encounter.

0:19:03.440 --> 0:19:06.119
<v Speaker 1>It's long been widely accepted that, you know, the newly

0:19:06.160 --> 0:19:08.680
<v Speaker 1>arrived humans at least played a role in the extinction

0:19:08.680 --> 0:19:11.440
<v Speaker 1>of the Moa. But there there there's been some disagreement

0:19:11.480 --> 0:19:14.199
<v Speaker 1>in the past over to what extent. For example, did

0:19:14.240 --> 0:19:19.080
<v Speaker 1>the archaic Mallory encounter thriving populations of moa across much

0:19:19.119 --> 0:19:22.280
<v Speaker 1>of the islands, or did they encounter dwindling populations of

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 1>moa that were restricted to certain areas, or did they

0:19:25.240 --> 0:19:29.960
<v Speaker 1>find moa populations that were already in severe decline. And

0:19:30.000 --> 0:19:32.560
<v Speaker 1>of course, depending on the answer, it paints a different

0:19:32.560 --> 0:19:37.080
<v Speaker 1>picture of the extent of Maori moa hunting and the

0:19:37.119 --> 0:19:40.600
<v Speaker 1>impact of their arrival. You know, some could argue that well,

0:19:40.600 --> 0:19:44.520
<v Speaker 1>in perhaps climate change, volcanic eruptions and or disease had

0:19:44.600 --> 0:19:49.399
<v Speaker 1>already impacted moa populations and humans were just the final straw.

0:19:50.440 --> 0:19:53.280
<v Speaker 1>So the moa certainly went extinct over the next century

0:19:53.359 --> 0:19:55.960
<v Speaker 1>or so. You know, there's no moa hiding in the

0:19:56.000 --> 0:19:58.760
<v Speaker 1>wilds of New Zealand, sadly, no matter what anybody might

0:19:58.760 --> 0:20:01.240
<v Speaker 1>try and tell you. And it wasn't until the nineteenth

0:20:01.240 --> 0:20:04.400
<v Speaker 1>century that Europeans discovered evidence of the great birds, consisting

0:20:04.440 --> 0:20:08.159
<v Speaker 1>of charred skeletons, gizzard stones and egg shells. They certainly

0:20:08.200 --> 0:20:12.040
<v Speaker 1>told the tale of their demise. DNA evidence, however, does

0:20:12.080 --> 0:20:15.639
<v Speaker 1>shine light on the question of pre Maori moa populations

0:20:16.040 --> 0:20:19.680
<v Speaker 1>as Rachel Newer wrote in The New York Times back

0:20:19.680 --> 0:20:24.159
<v Speaker 1>in quote Morton Eric Allentoft, a researcher of the University

0:20:24.200 --> 0:20:27.600
<v Speaker 1>of Copenhagen, and colleagues analyzed DNA from two hundred and

0:20:27.640 --> 0:20:31.760
<v Speaker 1>eighty one moas collected from museums and new excavations and

0:20:31.920 --> 0:20:35.159
<v Speaker 1>estimated the age of these specimens using radio carbon dating.

0:20:35.480 --> 0:20:38.800
<v Speaker 1>They found that in the millenniums before humans arrived in

0:20:38.840 --> 0:20:42.400
<v Speaker 1>New Zealand, the MOA displayed none of the genetic bottlenecking

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:47.360
<v Speaker 1>indicative of a declining population. So there's no genetic evidence

0:20:47.400 --> 0:20:50.359
<v Speaker 1>of a of a decline in the MOA during the

0:20:50.480 --> 0:20:55.359
<v Speaker 1>five thousand years prior to their rapid extinction. Uh, you know,

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:58.479
<v Speaker 1>via the human arrival. Okay, So what does that tell us?

0:20:58.880 --> 0:21:01.320
<v Speaker 1>What that leaves us with this version of the story,

0:21:01.520 --> 0:21:04.120
<v Speaker 1>The archaic Mallory arrived on the shores of a new

0:21:04.200 --> 0:21:08.480
<v Speaker 1>land where strange, often gigantic birds were roaming around, and

0:21:08.480 --> 0:21:11.800
<v Speaker 1>through the use of spears and snares and hunting dogs

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:14.280
<v Speaker 1>and the human cunning, they were able to bring the

0:21:14.320 --> 0:21:17.520
<v Speaker 1>birds down and process their kills with the same sort

0:21:17.520 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 1>of efficiency we see, you know, with the coury dogs.

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:24.119
<v Speaker 1>It's also possible that the moa had no natural fear

0:21:24.160 --> 0:21:26.639
<v Speaker 1>of humans as well, which would have just made them

0:21:26.680 --> 0:21:29.520
<v Speaker 1>even more susceptible to this kind of harvesting. Well, yeah,

0:21:29.520 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 1>i'd imagine that's possible, especially without um, without large mammalian

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:38.040
<v Speaker 1>predators on the island of New Zealand, Like they're only

0:21:38.160 --> 0:21:41.760
<v Speaker 1>real predator would have been the hostile eagle, right, which

0:21:42.440 --> 0:21:44.960
<v Speaker 1>they're adapted to a landscape in which the only thing

0:21:45.000 --> 0:21:48.240
<v Speaker 1>to worry about comes down at you from above. Uh.

0:21:48.800 --> 0:21:51.000
<v Speaker 1>Who knows what they would have done if, like, you know,

0:21:51.440 --> 0:21:55.359
<v Speaker 1>a bipedal hominid walks up to them in a group. Yeah, exactly.

0:21:55.840 --> 0:21:59.960
<v Speaker 1>And and plus their extinction didn't just come via the hunting.

0:22:00.000 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 1>Have grown adult MOA's because they're they're large, eggs were

0:22:04.600 --> 0:22:07.760
<v Speaker 1>certainly sought after foods as well. We see that from

0:22:07.760 --> 0:22:10.240
<v Speaker 1>some of the you know, the evidence of you know,

0:22:10.280 --> 0:22:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the finding egg shells and evidence of the eggs having

0:22:13.119 --> 0:22:16.040
<v Speaker 1>been consumed. And since the moa produced just one or

0:22:16.040 --> 0:22:18.720
<v Speaker 1>two eggs, the harvesting of their eggs would have further

0:22:18.840 --> 0:22:22.760
<v Speaker 1>spelled doom for the nine species of moa. For example,

0:22:23.040 --> 0:22:26.119
<v Speaker 1>the I believe this is a k Cora egg, the

0:22:26.200 --> 0:22:30.560
<v Speaker 1>largest moa egg ever uncovered would have weighed nine pounds

0:22:30.600 --> 0:22:34.760
<v Speaker 1>when fresh. Wow. To put that in perspective, an ostrich

0:22:34.800 --> 0:22:38.880
<v Speaker 1>egg typically weighs one point four kilograms or three point

0:22:38.920 --> 0:22:41.760
<v Speaker 1>one pounds, which is more than twenty times the weight

0:22:41.840 --> 0:22:44.879
<v Speaker 1>of a chicken egg. So we're talking about you know,

0:22:44.920 --> 0:22:48.840
<v Speaker 1>two two people, uh that have arrived on these islands,

0:22:48.880 --> 0:22:52.080
<v Speaker 1>you know, struggling for existence like that. That's huge bounty

0:22:52.080 --> 0:22:55.240
<v Speaker 1>of resources in that egg. Do you ever see anybody

0:22:55.320 --> 0:22:58.520
<v Speaker 1>eat an ostrich egg? I feel like I have before

0:22:59.240 --> 0:23:02.560
<v Speaker 1>in the past, but I haven't. It's not the kind

0:23:02.560 --> 0:23:04.480
<v Speaker 1>of thing I've seen on the menu recently. It did

0:23:04.480 --> 0:23:09.399
<v Speaker 1>not come highly recommended to me. Apparently, in addition to

0:23:09.440 --> 0:23:11.640
<v Speaker 1>being very large, it's got a it's got a tough shell.

0:23:11.720 --> 0:23:13.480
<v Speaker 1>I guess, as you might imagine. You know, it can't

0:23:13.520 --> 0:23:15.800
<v Speaker 1>just have like an egg shell thick like a chicken

0:23:15.840 --> 0:23:19.159
<v Speaker 1>egg shell thickness shell that's a little bit difficult to

0:23:19.160 --> 0:23:21.840
<v Speaker 1>get into. But then once you do get into it,

0:23:22.359 --> 0:23:26.120
<v Speaker 1>tremendous nutritional resources. Yeah, I mean that that that that's

0:23:26.119 --> 0:23:29.760
<v Speaker 1>a one egg omelet for you. Yeah. So basically the

0:23:29.800 --> 0:23:32.840
<v Speaker 1>situation is the Mauori ended up hunting and harvesting the

0:23:32.840 --> 0:23:37.000
<v Speaker 1>moa faster than the moa could reproduce, and as the

0:23:37.040 --> 0:23:40.760
<v Speaker 1>bounty of moa flesh and bone dwindled, the moa hunting

0:23:40.800 --> 0:23:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Maori diversified and came to depend on fishing, fouling, uh

0:23:45.320 --> 0:23:48.359
<v Speaker 1>in the gathering of mollusks, et cetera. And this led

0:23:48.359 --> 0:23:51.919
<v Speaker 1>to the establishment of more permanent and semi permanent settlements.

0:23:52.320 --> 0:23:53.960
<v Speaker 1>So then it looks like it really was us. It

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:57.119
<v Speaker 1>was people that drove the moa extinct. Oh yes, I

0:23:57.680 --> 0:24:00.000
<v Speaker 1>I think at this point, especially with the genetic evidence,

0:24:00.119 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 1>that's that's with without question now. Is reported in Why

0:24:04.040 --> 0:24:08.119
<v Speaker 1>did New Zealand's Moas Go Extinct? By Virginia Morrell Morton Allentoft,

0:24:08.160 --> 0:24:11.520
<v Speaker 1>who mentioned earlier evolutionary biologist at the University of Copenhagen

0:24:11.840 --> 0:24:15.679
<v Speaker 1>remarked in that the idea may run counter to some

0:24:15.840 --> 0:24:18.760
<v Speaker 1>ideas that we tend to have about indigenous people. We

0:24:18.840 --> 0:24:21.880
<v Speaker 1>often think of them, uh you know, living in equilibrium

0:24:21.960 --> 0:24:25.600
<v Speaker 1>with nature, but the mallory end up killing and eating

0:24:25.600 --> 0:24:29.320
<v Speaker 1>the moa at every stage of the creature's life. So

0:24:29.640 --> 0:24:33.000
<v Speaker 1>alan Toft contends that this sort of harmony with nature

0:24:33.200 --> 0:24:37.919
<v Speaker 1>that we sometimes envisioned ultimately rarely exists within human beings,

0:24:37.960 --> 0:24:41.520
<v Speaker 1>and that any arriving humans would have extinguished the moa

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:45.760
<v Speaker 1>the same way. And certainly we see other such extinctions, um,

0:24:45.800 --> 0:24:49.320
<v Speaker 1>you know, including the distinctions of large flightless birds due

0:24:49.400 --> 0:24:52.320
<v Speaker 1>to the arrival of humans. So again, don't think less

0:24:52.320 --> 0:24:55.040
<v Speaker 1>of the Maori for the extinction of the moa. Uh.

0:24:55.080 --> 0:24:58.520
<v Speaker 1>These great birds were always on a collision course with humans,

0:24:58.520 --> 0:25:01.760
<v Speaker 1>and if by some miracle the Polynesians had never found

0:25:01.800 --> 0:25:06.080
<v Speaker 1>New Zealand, the Europeans would have eradicated the moa on

0:25:06.119 --> 0:25:10.960
<v Speaker 1>their own. So again, it's an old story. Humans arrive somewhere,

0:25:11.320 --> 0:25:14.520
<v Speaker 1>mega fauna is hunted into extinction. We see that with

0:25:14.560 --> 0:25:17.960
<v Speaker 1>the mammoths, we see that with cave bears, giant kangaroos, etcetera.

0:25:18.359 --> 0:25:21.840
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, I mean it seems like a ubiquitous picture

0:25:21.880 --> 0:25:26.400
<v Speaker 1>of human development and geographical spread, Like it is absolutely

0:25:26.400 --> 0:25:31.680
<v Speaker 1>nothing unique about whatever individual culture reached this mega fauna first. Now,

0:25:31.960 --> 0:25:34.160
<v Speaker 1>I think one of the really fascinating questions in all

0:25:34.160 --> 0:25:37.720
<v Speaker 1>of this is beyond the questions of like Europeans figuring

0:25:37.760 --> 0:25:41.320
<v Speaker 1>out what the Mallory thought about the moa, is just

0:25:41.359 --> 0:25:44.479
<v Speaker 1>a question of like, what how does that impact a people?

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:46.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, to to have come to this, to come

0:25:46.480 --> 0:25:49.760
<v Speaker 1>to New Zealand to be essentially become the mallory. And

0:25:49.800 --> 0:25:52.360
<v Speaker 1>in the process of becoming the mallory, you go through

0:25:52.400 --> 0:25:55.680
<v Speaker 1>this period of Moa hunting mallory in which you have

0:25:55.800 --> 0:25:59.560
<v Speaker 1>this you know, this bounty of these these creatures to

0:25:59.560 --> 0:26:02.520
<v Speaker 1>to to hunt and feed on, and then they're gone.

0:26:02.600 --> 0:26:05.280
<v Speaker 1>Then you have to diversify and change the way you live,

0:26:05.680 --> 0:26:08.639
<v Speaker 1>like what is the memory of that like in a people.

0:26:09.680 --> 0:26:13.120
<v Speaker 1>I found a fascinating article about this published on The Conversation.

0:26:13.760 --> 0:26:20.679
<v Speaker 1>It's by conservation biologist Priscilla Way, University of Waikato, Associate

0:26:20.680 --> 0:26:26.439
<v Speaker 1>Professor him A Wanga and Professor of computational biology Murray Cox.

0:26:26.840 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 1>It was published in two thousand and eighteen and it's

0:26:29.119 --> 0:26:32.719
<v Speaker 1>titled Dead as the Moa Oral traditions show that early

0:26:32.800 --> 0:26:37.840
<v Speaker 1>Maori recognized extinction interesting. So the team of researchers here,

0:26:37.840 --> 0:26:42.119
<v Speaker 1>which includes a conservation biologist, a linguist, a bioinformationist, and

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:46.040
<v Speaker 1>experts in Maori culture. They stressed that tracing the centuries

0:26:46.040 --> 0:26:51.040
<v Speaker 1>old extinctions is difficult, but that through the collaborative analysis

0:26:51.119 --> 0:26:56.760
<v Speaker 1>of ancestral sayings traditional ancestral sayings in Maori culture, they

0:26:56.760 --> 0:27:00.000
<v Speaker 1>found that early Maori certainly paid attention to the stay

0:27:00.119 --> 0:27:02.680
<v Speaker 1>to flora and fauna in their environment, and that they

0:27:02.800 --> 0:27:07.199
<v Speaker 1>recognized the extinction of the moa. But despite knowing roughly

0:27:07.359 --> 0:27:09.960
<v Speaker 1>when and who you know regarding the mo extinction, and

0:27:10.160 --> 0:27:12.159
<v Speaker 1>we don't really know a lot about how the Malory

0:27:12.240 --> 0:27:15.040
<v Speaker 1>felt about and how they processed this event, which again

0:27:15.080 --> 0:27:17.879
<v Speaker 1>would have been a major event in their lives. This

0:27:17.960 --> 0:27:20.800
<v Speaker 1>was the destruction of an important food source as well

0:27:20.840 --> 0:27:23.879
<v Speaker 1>as a source of various tools and parts. Uh, some

0:27:24.040 --> 0:27:28.000
<v Speaker 1>of this remains in the Malory oral traditions, specifically in

0:27:28.080 --> 0:27:32.800
<v Speaker 1>these various ancestral sayings. So the researchers here they point out,

0:27:33.200 --> 0:27:36.840
<v Speaker 1>uh that of these ancestral sayings, uh, the ones that

0:27:36.920 --> 0:27:41.080
<v Speaker 1>refer to birds anyway, a disproportionate number of them refer

0:27:41.240 --> 0:27:44.479
<v Speaker 1>to the moa, to their appearance, to their into their nature,

0:27:44.800 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 1>and their uses to humans. All right, so what would

0:27:47.280 --> 0:27:50.760
<v Speaker 1>these things go like in translation? Well, yeah, I'm just

0:27:50.760 --> 0:27:52.960
<v Speaker 1>gonna share their translations. So they do. They include the

0:27:53.000 --> 0:27:56.639
<v Speaker 1>original Maori versions in this article, so and encourage anyone

0:27:56.680 --> 0:27:58.760
<v Speaker 1>to that it's interested to check that out. But like

0:27:58.800 --> 0:28:01.679
<v Speaker 1>one of them is law lost, as the moa was lost.

0:28:03.119 --> 0:28:05.639
<v Speaker 1>So that's kind of like an expression like dead as

0:28:05.680 --> 0:28:09.680
<v Speaker 1>a doornail, like yeah, yeah, or hidden as the moa hit.

0:28:10.160 --> 0:28:12.919
<v Speaker 1>And then here's another one, the people will disappear like

0:28:13.040 --> 0:28:16.240
<v Speaker 1>the moa. And this this one's really haunting because they

0:28:16.280 --> 0:28:20.800
<v Speaker 1>point out that as the Europeans arrived, the Maori compared

0:28:20.840 --> 0:28:24.240
<v Speaker 1>their plight to that of the Moa. So here's a

0:28:24.320 --> 0:28:29.360
<v Speaker 1>quote Mauori recalled the moa. After Europeans arrived, two Mauory

0:28:29.440 --> 0:28:33.160
<v Speaker 1>were suffering badly from diseases and deprivation. In the late

0:28:33.160 --> 0:28:36.639
<v Speaker 1>eighteen hundreds. It was as though the Maori world was

0:28:36.720 --> 0:28:39.880
<v Speaker 1>being felled along with the forests. There was a very

0:28:40.040 --> 0:28:43.880
<v Speaker 1>real fear among both Maori and Europeans that Maori people

0:28:44.120 --> 0:28:48.000
<v Speaker 1>and culture would also disappear, just like the Moa. Wow,

0:28:48.040 --> 0:28:51.480
<v Speaker 1>that is haunting. Yeah, I'm still thinking about these expressions.

0:28:51.520 --> 0:28:53.720
<v Speaker 1>I was trying to think of a point of comparison.

0:28:53.840 --> 0:28:57.280
<v Speaker 1>Of course, one is h is like gone the way

0:28:57.280 --> 0:29:01.120
<v Speaker 1>of the dinosaurs h An EXPI in English. Though, of course,

0:29:01.120 --> 0:29:03.600
<v Speaker 1>our knowledge of where the dinosaurs went does not come

0:29:03.640 --> 0:29:07.320
<v Speaker 1>from cultural memory. It comes from like something we learned

0:29:07.360 --> 0:29:10.720
<v Speaker 1>through science. I guess you could maybe say gone the

0:29:10.720 --> 0:29:13.640
<v Speaker 1>way of the dodos. Some people say that that, Yeah,

0:29:13.880 --> 0:29:16.480
<v Speaker 1>though I guess when people say that they tend, they

0:29:16.480 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 1>tend not to do it with any accepted role in

0:29:19.560 --> 0:29:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the in the extinction. You know, like I feel like

0:29:22.720 --> 0:29:26.160
<v Speaker 1>that's one of the aspects here worth pondering, is that,

0:29:26.360 --> 0:29:29.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, the Mallory would have have realized that their

0:29:29.680 --> 0:29:34.040
<v Speaker 1>ancestors played this role in the extinction. Now that's not

0:29:34.080 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 1>to say that, you know, did it on purpose. Obviously

0:29:36.160 --> 0:29:39.000
<v Speaker 1>there's a there's a huge difference between you know, a

0:29:39.080 --> 0:29:41.600
<v Speaker 1>setting out to cause an extinction and I don't. You know,

0:29:41.640 --> 0:29:43.800
<v Speaker 1>obviously they wouldn't want to have to have done that,

0:29:43.880 --> 0:29:47.120
<v Speaker 1>because these creatures were a source of of of of

0:29:47.240 --> 0:29:51.120
<v Speaker 1>vast resources to them. But you know, they were you know,

0:29:51.200 --> 0:29:54.000
<v Speaker 1>ultimately it was it was not something that were capable

0:29:54.080 --> 0:29:58.120
<v Speaker 1>of exerting control over, you know, I mean, like it's

0:29:58.120 --> 0:30:00.440
<v Speaker 1>it's really has always been a human struggle to figure

0:30:00.480 --> 0:30:04.720
<v Speaker 1>out to what extent we can exploit the natural world

0:30:05.160 --> 0:30:09.240
<v Speaker 1>without damaging it beyond control. And clearly, like that is

0:30:09.280 --> 0:30:13.520
<v Speaker 1>something that is still a major stumbling block to human beings.

0:30:13.560 --> 0:30:17.240
<v Speaker 1>We still mishandle that same equation on a on a

0:30:17.360 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 1>daily basis. All Right, we're gonna take one more break,

0:30:20.440 --> 0:30:22.520
<v Speaker 1>but when we come back you know we're gonna move

0:30:22.560 --> 0:30:26.200
<v Speaker 1>beyond the extinction of the moa and ponder the question, well,

0:30:26.600 --> 0:30:33.120
<v Speaker 1>could we bring the moa back? All right, we're back

0:30:33.440 --> 0:30:36.800
<v Speaker 1>a dinosaur story. Is that a movie? We're back a

0:30:36.840 --> 0:30:39.800
<v Speaker 1>dinosaur Story? You don't know that movie? I don't know that.

0:30:39.880 --> 0:30:42.760
<v Speaker 1>I do. Oh man, I think I rented that when

0:30:42.760 --> 0:30:47.240
<v Speaker 1>I was a kid. Let's see when did that come out? Based?

0:30:48.520 --> 0:30:50.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh yeah, I rented that one when I was a kid.

0:30:50.480 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 1>That was that was a Turtles video. Find that I

0:30:53.720 --> 0:30:57.360
<v Speaker 1>brought home, cavenge that from the from the Bone Heap.

0:30:57.440 --> 0:31:00.600
<v Speaker 1>And I don't think it was good. Mean, I haven't

0:31:00.600 --> 0:31:02.440
<v Speaker 1>seen it since I was a child. It does not

0:31:02.520 --> 0:31:05.000
<v Speaker 1>seem like one of the animated dinosaur movies that would

0:31:05.000 --> 0:31:07.080
<v Speaker 1>hold up best. I don't know. I'm looking it up.

0:31:07.120 --> 0:31:10.560
<v Speaker 1>And this voicecast. You got John Goodman, you got Jay

0:31:10.680 --> 0:31:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Leno cron Kite. I think Walter Cronkite plays like a

0:31:14.640 --> 0:31:18.680
<v Speaker 1>mad scientist who brings dinosaurs through a tieme portal or

0:31:18.720 --> 0:31:21.400
<v Speaker 1>something and puts him into New York in the in

0:31:21.440 --> 0:31:25.680
<v Speaker 1>the nineties. And Julia Child is in this really yeah,

0:31:25.960 --> 0:31:28.400
<v Speaker 1>does she play one of the dinosaurs? No, Sadly, she

0:31:28.480 --> 0:31:33.400
<v Speaker 1>plays a worker at the Museum of Natural History. Okay, well,

0:31:33.560 --> 0:31:36.400
<v Speaker 1>I don't know, maybe that would be uh interesting to

0:31:36.440 --> 0:31:38.920
<v Speaker 1>go back and excavate at some point, but yeah, it

0:31:38.960 --> 0:31:43.280
<v Speaker 1>looks great. It has four directors, always a good mark

0:31:43.360 --> 0:31:48.800
<v Speaker 1>of quality. Okay, so we're talking about the possible resurrection

0:31:48.880 --> 0:31:51.320
<v Speaker 1>of the moa. Now, there was a pretty good article

0:31:51.400 --> 0:31:53.840
<v Speaker 1>I was reading about this on stat by the science

0:31:53.880 --> 0:31:58.720
<v Speaker 1>writer Sharon Begley from February seven, uh, and it concerned

0:31:58.760 --> 0:32:01.680
<v Speaker 1>the possible d extinction and of one species of moa.

0:32:02.400 --> 0:32:04.400
<v Speaker 1>Of course, if you're not familiar with the concept of

0:32:04.480 --> 0:32:06.480
<v Speaker 1>d extinction, it has come up on the show before,

0:32:06.520 --> 0:32:08.600
<v Speaker 1>but you can probably figure it out from the name, right.

0:32:08.640 --> 0:32:12.000
<v Speaker 1>It's also known as a resurrection biology. It refers to

0:32:12.040 --> 0:32:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the process of bringing an extinct species back to life.

0:32:15.200 --> 0:32:19.560
<v Speaker 1>The pop culture example that everybody knows is Jurassic Park. Now,

0:32:19.600 --> 0:32:22.440
<v Speaker 1>what did they do in Jurassic Park? They found ancient

0:32:22.520 --> 0:32:27.120
<v Speaker 1>deposits of amber or fossilized tree sap in which dinosaur

0:32:27.280 --> 0:32:31.480
<v Speaker 1>era mosquitoes had been trapped when the sap was still soft,

0:32:31.840 --> 0:32:34.880
<v Speaker 1>and then the sap hardened over time and then fossilized

0:32:34.880 --> 0:32:38.560
<v Speaker 1>in the ground. Presumably the the mosquitoes in the sap

0:32:38.600 --> 0:32:41.600
<v Speaker 1>were trapped with their bellies full of dinosaur blood that

0:32:41.640 --> 0:32:44.640
<v Speaker 1>they had just feasted on. And so the scientists in

0:32:44.640 --> 0:32:46.960
<v Speaker 1>the book, in the movie Jurassic Park, they extract the

0:32:47.000 --> 0:32:51.000
<v Speaker 1>preserved dinosaur blood, they sequence it out, they get mr

0:32:51.080 --> 0:32:54.040
<v Speaker 1>DNA from the from the insect bellies, and then they

0:32:54.160 --> 0:32:56.680
<v Speaker 1>use that blood and the DNA sequenced from it to

0:32:56.720 --> 0:33:00.160
<v Speaker 1>clone dinosaurs. It was, of course, I would say, y

0:33:00.320 --> 0:33:03.280
<v Speaker 1>ingenious plot device, but unfortunately it looks like it probably

0:33:03.280 --> 0:33:06.400
<v Speaker 1>would not work in reality. What if? What if? The

0:33:06.480 --> 0:33:09.360
<v Speaker 1>reason it didn't work, though, was that it turns out

0:33:09.360 --> 0:33:12.920
<v Speaker 1>the mosquitoes had not consumed the blood of dinosaurs, but

0:33:13.000 --> 0:33:16.640
<v Speaker 1>it consumed the blood of the time travelers from Ray

0:33:16.680 --> 0:33:21.320
<v Speaker 1>Bradbury Sound of thunder Man. What what were the chances

0:33:21.640 --> 0:33:26.480
<v Speaker 1>that would be a very good closed time travel loop? What?

0:33:26.480 --> 0:33:29.000
<v Speaker 1>What do you like better the time travel movies where

0:33:29.000 --> 0:33:31.200
<v Speaker 1>you go back and actually changed the past, or the

0:33:31.200 --> 0:33:33.120
<v Speaker 1>ones where you go back and it proves to be

0:33:33.160 --> 0:33:36.560
<v Speaker 1>a closed loop where you just cause whatever present already happened.

0:33:37.720 --> 0:33:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Oh well, you have to go back and forth between

0:33:39.440 --> 0:33:41.640
<v Speaker 1>the two. You know, I feel like that's the only

0:33:41.640 --> 0:33:44.680
<v Speaker 1>way it really works. You know, It's like it's the

0:33:44.760 --> 0:33:48.080
<v Speaker 1>sour in the suite with your time travel. But let's

0:33:48.080 --> 0:33:51.880
<v Speaker 1>bring things back to Jurassic Park. Why didn't it work? Okay,

0:33:51.960 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 1>So basically there are several reasons, but they all come

0:33:55.400 --> 0:33:58.480
<v Speaker 1>down to time. Now. One of the reasons is not

0:33:58.720 --> 0:34:02.480
<v Speaker 1>in fact that you couldn't discover a mosquito with prehistoric

0:34:02.520 --> 0:34:05.440
<v Speaker 1>blood and its guts that uh. But believe it or not,

0:34:05.640 --> 0:34:10.759
<v Speaker 1>paleontologists actually have discovered preserved insects full of the remains

0:34:10.840 --> 0:34:14.040
<v Speaker 1>of not not intact, but the remains of prehistoric blood

0:34:14.440 --> 0:34:17.560
<v Speaker 1>in fossil beds. Uh. And this is a slight tangent.

0:34:17.600 --> 0:34:19.640
<v Speaker 1>But I didn't already know this, and I was amazed

0:34:19.680 --> 0:34:22.800
<v Speaker 1>by what I was reading here. So there's one prominent

0:34:22.840 --> 0:34:24.640
<v Speaker 1>example I could find. I don't know if this is

0:34:24.680 --> 0:34:28.200
<v Speaker 1>still the only major example known today, but it was

0:34:28.280 --> 0:34:30.640
<v Speaker 1>described in a research article published in p N A

0:34:30.880 --> 0:34:35.560
<v Speaker 1>s in called Hema Globin derived Porphyrion's preserved in a

0:34:35.640 --> 0:34:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Middle Eocene blood engorged mosquito. And it was by Dale E.

0:34:39.800 --> 0:34:44.760
<v Speaker 1>Greenwal To, Julia S. Garreva, Sandra M. Celia Strom, Tim Rose,

0:34:44.920 --> 0:34:48.360
<v Speaker 1>and Ralph E. Harback. And the discovery was also written

0:34:48.400 --> 0:34:50.560
<v Speaker 1>up by ed Young in a short news item for

0:34:50.560 --> 0:34:55.319
<v Speaker 1>the journal Nature on October four. So, the researchers here

0:34:55.360 --> 0:34:59.600
<v Speaker 1>were examining a total of thirty six mosquito specimens from

0:34:59.600 --> 0:35:03.200
<v Speaker 1>a shape old deposit known as the Coal Creek member

0:35:03.520 --> 0:35:08.120
<v Speaker 1>of the kischen In formation in northwestern Montana, and the

0:35:08.239 --> 0:35:11.840
<v Speaker 1>layer from which they were recovered is estimated to be

0:35:11.880 --> 0:35:14.600
<v Speaker 1>about forty six million years old. So this collection of

0:35:14.600 --> 0:35:20.560
<v Speaker 1>fossilized mosquitoes included two previously unknown species of the genus Cooliseda.

0:35:21.120 --> 0:35:24.479
<v Speaker 1>One was cool Asseda kischen in and one was cool

0:35:24.520 --> 0:35:29.280
<v Speaker 1>Asseda lemniscata. But one of the mosquitoes from the bonyard

0:35:29.440 --> 0:35:32.160
<v Speaker 1>was truly special and you can look up images if

0:35:32.200 --> 0:35:35.319
<v Speaker 1>you want on the internet. In the words of the researchers,

0:35:35.360 --> 0:35:38.880
<v Speaker 1>the image of this specimen was quote obviously that of

0:35:38.920 --> 0:35:44.200
<v Speaker 1>a female blood engorged mosquito with non plumos antennae and

0:35:44.239 --> 0:35:49.080
<v Speaker 1>a very dark red black distended abdomen compared with the

0:35:49.239 --> 0:35:53.319
<v Speaker 1>non hematophagus male. Uh so there's a new word for

0:35:53.320 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 1>your vampire fiction. By the way, him at a phagus

0:35:55.719 --> 0:35:59.440
<v Speaker 1>means eats blood or drinks blood. Non hematophagus would mean

0:35:59.480 --> 0:36:02.680
<v Speaker 1>does not blood like the male mosquitoes. The male mosquito

0:36:02.719 --> 0:36:06.359
<v Speaker 1>doesn't drink blood. Obviously, if your gut is busting with

0:36:06.440 --> 0:36:09.600
<v Speaker 1>blood like this, uh, this female mosquito here, you are

0:36:09.680 --> 0:36:12.680
<v Speaker 1>him out of vegas. But but ed Young writes in

0:36:12.680 --> 0:36:16.840
<v Speaker 1>his summary that prior to this discovery, paleontologists had found

0:36:16.880 --> 0:36:19.799
<v Speaker 1>fossils of blood sucking insects, but we always had to

0:36:19.920 --> 0:36:22.719
<v Speaker 1>guess what these insects were feeding on through kind of

0:36:22.760 --> 0:36:27.960
<v Speaker 1>indirect cues, like preserved evidence of blood borne parasites contained

0:36:27.960 --> 0:36:31.560
<v Speaker 1>in their digestive systems. This fossil find was totally different

0:36:31.600 --> 0:36:36.080
<v Speaker 1>because it contained direct molecular evidence of blood feeding within

0:36:36.160 --> 0:36:40.400
<v Speaker 1>the insects gut, specifically lots of iron and organic compounds

0:36:40.440 --> 0:36:44.760
<v Speaker 1>called porphyrans, which are constituents of hemoglobin that's the protein

0:36:44.840 --> 0:36:48.720
<v Speaker 1>responsible for transporting oxygen in blood. Uh. And the find

0:36:48.800 --> 0:36:52.000
<v Speaker 1>was also extremely unlikely. In the words of the lead author,

0:36:52.080 --> 0:36:56.239
<v Speaker 1>Dale Greenwalt quote, the abdomen of a blood engorged mosquito

0:36:56.360 --> 0:36:59.920
<v Speaker 1>is like a balloon ready to burst. It is very fragile.

0:37:00.360 --> 0:37:03.560
<v Speaker 1>The chances that it wouldn't have disintegrated prior to fossilization

0:37:03.640 --> 0:37:08.560
<v Speaker 1>were infinitesimally small. And it's amazing because that's on top

0:37:08.640 --> 0:37:12.520
<v Speaker 1>of the already minuscule chances of any animal being fossilized

0:37:12.560 --> 0:37:15.680
<v Speaker 1>in the first place. I mean, remember, the fossil lottery

0:37:15.760 --> 0:37:19.400
<v Speaker 1>has few winners. Almost all organisms that ever live just

0:37:19.520 --> 0:37:24.239
<v Speaker 1>decomposed and disappear without leaving a trace. But unfortunately, there

0:37:24.239 --> 0:37:27.120
<v Speaker 1>are a couple of reasons you cannot use this mosquito

0:37:27.280 --> 0:37:29.680
<v Speaker 1>or a mosquito like it to extract dino d n

0:37:29.760 --> 0:37:35.200
<v Speaker 1>a Bengal dino. Both of these reasons have to do

0:37:35.239 --> 0:37:38.320
<v Speaker 1>with time. So the first is that the fossil mosquito

0:37:38.360 --> 0:37:40.840
<v Speaker 1>is only forty six million years old. So the last

0:37:40.880 --> 0:37:43.440
<v Speaker 1>of the non avian dinosaurs we know died out in

0:37:43.480 --> 0:37:47.439
<v Speaker 1>the KPg extinction that was about sixty six million years ago.

0:37:47.719 --> 0:37:50.759
<v Speaker 1>This mosquito would have been from the Middle Eocene. H

0:37:50.880 --> 0:37:53.719
<v Speaker 1>So if it were possible to clone anything based on

0:37:53.800 --> 0:37:56.360
<v Speaker 1>what was in the mosquitoes guts, it would have to

0:37:56.360 --> 0:37:59.600
<v Speaker 1>be something that lived in North America around that period.

0:38:00.000 --> 0:38:02.600
<v Speaker 1>And I was like, well, hell, I'll look up a candidate,

0:38:02.800 --> 0:38:05.040
<v Speaker 1>and I found a pretty cool one that the coolest

0:38:05.080 --> 0:38:08.560
<v Speaker 1>candidate I could come up with was named Miss Sonics,

0:38:08.560 --> 0:38:11.759
<v Speaker 1>whose name means middle claw and who was part of

0:38:11.760 --> 0:38:17.640
<v Speaker 1>a now extinct, larger group of carnivorous ungulates. Carnivorous ungulates.

0:38:17.680 --> 0:38:23.080
<v Speaker 1>Remember the unguluts are the hoofed mammals. Uh. So examples

0:38:23.120 --> 0:38:29.239
<v Speaker 1>would be dear you know, bo vines, uh, horses, but these,

0:38:29.280 --> 0:38:31.880
<v Speaker 1>of course are carnivorous. You can't think of unguluts like

0:38:31.920 --> 0:38:37.480
<v Speaker 1>that today. There were once predatory carnivorous hoofed mammals roaming

0:38:37.480 --> 0:38:40.080
<v Speaker 1>the continents. Uh. You know, try to think of a

0:38:40.120 --> 0:38:43.040
<v Speaker 1>donkey that could eat you. Yeah, and this is a

0:38:43.120 --> 0:38:46.520
<v Speaker 1>really cool one to look up paleo art for because

0:38:46.760 --> 0:38:48.960
<v Speaker 1>it seems like it's just a very hard creature to

0:38:48.960 --> 0:38:51.920
<v Speaker 1>try and envision in your head. You know, a lot

0:38:51.960 --> 0:38:54.280
<v Speaker 1>of the illustrations end up just looking like this weird

0:38:54.400 --> 0:38:58.120
<v Speaker 1>kind of like long snouted, almost almost like a cross

0:38:58.200 --> 0:39:02.680
<v Speaker 1>between a rodent and a lion. Uh. You get a

0:39:02.719 --> 0:39:05.359
<v Speaker 1>really really weird sense of category confusion when you look

0:39:05.360 --> 0:39:08.719
<v Speaker 1>at these images. I mean, a lot of uh descriptions

0:39:08.719 --> 0:39:10.839
<v Speaker 1>say it would have been in some ways superficially like

0:39:10.880 --> 0:39:13.239
<v Speaker 1>a wolf, but of course it was not of the

0:39:13.800 --> 0:39:16.359
<v Speaker 1>order of the dogs. It was not like a big cat.

0:39:16.440 --> 0:39:18.879
<v Speaker 1>It's not like a wolf. It's not any of that

0:39:18.920 --> 0:39:21.880
<v Speaker 1>in terms of evolutionary relationships. It's more like a deer

0:39:22.160 --> 0:39:25.640
<v Speaker 1>or a cow or a horse or something, but it

0:39:25.760 --> 0:39:28.000
<v Speaker 1>is a carnivore that would you know, might bite your

0:39:28.080 --> 0:39:30.480
<v Speaker 1>leg off. So anyway, I'm all for cloning a ton

0:39:30.520 --> 0:39:33.320
<v Speaker 1>of those if we could. But again I want to

0:39:33.360 --> 0:39:37.279
<v Speaker 1>stress that, uh, there was not clonable material within that

0:39:37.320 --> 0:39:40.080
<v Speaker 1>mosquito's abdomen, and in fact, based on what we know,

0:39:40.200 --> 0:39:44.280
<v Speaker 1>there couldn't be because the other reason you couldn't clone

0:39:44.320 --> 0:39:47.440
<v Speaker 1>dinosaurs from the gut contents of any mosquito is that

0:39:47.520 --> 0:39:51.320
<v Speaker 1>DNA is extremely fragile. It breaks down very quickly, and

0:39:51.360 --> 0:39:53.960
<v Speaker 1>it starts breaking down within hours of the death of

0:39:53.960 --> 0:39:58.240
<v Speaker 1>an organism. After forty six million years, DNA would degrade

0:39:58.239 --> 0:40:01.320
<v Speaker 1>to the point where a genome can longer be recovered,

0:40:01.880 --> 0:40:04.919
<v Speaker 1>all the more at anything older than sixty six million years.

0:40:04.920 --> 0:40:07.680
<v Speaker 1>So you can't get to a dinosaur. Uh So then

0:40:07.760 --> 0:40:10.600
<v Speaker 1>you might wonder, well, how long can DNA last in

0:40:10.800 --> 0:40:13.640
<v Speaker 1>in preserved animal remains. What's the farthest back that we

0:40:13.680 --> 0:40:17.040
<v Speaker 1>could go to sequence the genome of an extinct creature,

0:40:17.120 --> 0:40:20.960
<v Speaker 1>extract all that information, and then maybe even clone it

0:40:21.000 --> 0:40:24.239
<v Speaker 1>back to life if possible. Well, the MOA has a

0:40:24.280 --> 0:40:26.520
<v Speaker 1>part to play in the answer to this question. I

0:40:26.800 --> 0:40:29.359
<v Speaker 1>found this out by total serendipity. I didn't even know

0:40:29.480 --> 0:40:32.640
<v Speaker 1>this when I started looking into this subject. Uh So,

0:40:32.719 --> 0:40:36.280
<v Speaker 1>to determine the period within which you could reasonably expect

0:40:36.280 --> 0:40:39.239
<v Speaker 1>to extract usable DNA from a sample, you need to

0:40:39.280 --> 0:40:43.520
<v Speaker 1>know the rate of molecular decay for DNA as a molecule.

0:40:43.960 --> 0:40:47.280
<v Speaker 1>And there was a study in that looked into this question.

0:40:47.400 --> 0:40:50.239
<v Speaker 1>It was by our friend Morton E. Allentoft that you

0:40:50.320 --> 0:40:55.080
<v Speaker 1>mentioned earlier, but also by Matthew Collins, David Harker, James Highly,

0:40:55.960 --> 0:41:01.040
<v Speaker 1>Charlotte L. Oscome, Marie L. Hale, Paula F. Campos uh oh,

0:41:01.080 --> 0:41:02.880
<v Speaker 1>and apparently at others. I guess it had a lot

0:41:02.920 --> 0:41:05.919
<v Speaker 1>of authors. Sorry, but it was called the Half Life

0:41:05.920 --> 0:41:08.920
<v Speaker 1>of DNA and Bone Measuring Decay Kinetics in a hundred

0:41:08.960 --> 0:41:12.239
<v Speaker 1>and fifty eight dated Fossils published in the Proceedings of

0:41:12.280 --> 0:41:16.160
<v Speaker 1>the Royal Society b So. The authors here examined mitochondrial

0:41:16.239 --> 0:41:19.280
<v Speaker 1>DNA from a hundred and fifty eight radio carbon dated

0:41:19.400 --> 0:41:23.400
<v Speaker 1>bones of the extinct New Zealand MOA, all from between

0:41:23.520 --> 0:41:27.480
<v Speaker 1>six hundred and eight thousand years ago, and all preserved

0:41:27.520 --> 0:41:31.319
<v Speaker 1>in roughly equivalent environmental conditions. And that's very important because

0:41:31.320 --> 0:41:33.360
<v Speaker 1>it gives us a point of reference. If like the

0:41:33.400 --> 0:41:36.880
<v Speaker 1>conditions under which the bones are preserved or roughly the same,

0:41:37.480 --> 0:41:39.880
<v Speaker 1>then you can start to get a good idea between

0:41:39.960 --> 0:41:42.759
<v Speaker 1>them what the average rate of decay is. It's not

0:41:42.800 --> 0:41:45.840
<v Speaker 1>going to vary as much due to differing environmental factors.

0:41:46.400 --> 0:41:50.240
<v Speaker 1>Um So they estimated from this sample that the average

0:41:50.239 --> 0:41:53.880
<v Speaker 1>half life of DNA was about five hundred and twenty

0:41:53.880 --> 0:41:56.200
<v Speaker 1>one years. So you start with an original sample of

0:41:56.320 --> 0:41:59.480
<v Speaker 1>DNA and a bone, and after five dred twenty one years,

0:41:59.520 --> 0:42:02.880
<v Speaker 1>half of it gone. Then after another five and twenty

0:42:02.880 --> 0:42:05.319
<v Speaker 1>one years, half of what remains is broken down, So

0:42:05.360 --> 0:42:07.919
<v Speaker 1>now you're down to a quarter of the original concentration.

0:42:08.360 --> 0:42:12.440
<v Speaker 1>So the the decay adds up fast. Uh. Now, of

0:42:12.480 --> 0:42:14.680
<v Speaker 1>course the decay rate of DNA will not be the

0:42:14.760 --> 0:42:17.239
<v Speaker 1>same in all cases. It's going to depend on factors

0:42:18.120 --> 0:42:21.839
<v Speaker 1>about in what conditions it's preserved. But even in ideal conditions,

0:42:22.239 --> 0:42:24.680
<v Speaker 1>there does appear to be a ceiling on how long

0:42:25.440 --> 0:42:28.319
<v Speaker 1>DNA lasts or or how long you could expect to

0:42:28.400 --> 0:42:32.040
<v Speaker 1>get any usable information out of it under the absolute

0:42:32.160 --> 0:42:36.360
<v Speaker 1>best conditions. This means basically, every molecular bond between the

0:42:36.440 --> 0:42:40.000
<v Speaker 1>nucleotides of the DNA would be broken down after about

0:42:40.000 --> 0:42:43.200
<v Speaker 1>six point eight million years, but long before that, even

0:42:43.200 --> 0:42:46.520
<v Speaker 1>if some bonds are still intact, the DNA would be

0:42:46.560 --> 0:42:50.760
<v Speaker 1>so broken up that would be unreadable. The maximum recoverability

0:42:50.800 --> 0:42:54.600
<v Speaker 1>threshold for meaningful genetic information might be something like one

0:42:54.640 --> 0:42:57.640
<v Speaker 1>point five million years or so. So it seems to

0:42:57.719 --> 0:43:00.480
<v Speaker 1>have been the scientific consensus for for several years now

0:43:00.520 --> 0:43:03.080
<v Speaker 1>that DNA is way too short lived for us to

0:43:03.120 --> 0:43:07.200
<v Speaker 1>ever clone dinosaurs. Except I did come across a really

0:43:07.239 --> 0:43:11.600
<v Speaker 1>recent study just from this month March. Uh Now, it

0:43:11.680 --> 0:43:16.080
<v Speaker 1>doesn't disprove that this, but it is a still controversial

0:43:16.200 --> 0:43:19.840
<v Speaker 1>reported finding that would seem to challenge this if it's correct,

0:43:20.440 --> 0:43:23.040
<v Speaker 1>and so it was published in National Science Review in

0:43:23.080 --> 0:43:28.680
<v Speaker 1>March by Alita im Baliol at All and uh so

0:43:28.800 --> 0:43:32.800
<v Speaker 1>the the author's right here quote a histological ground section

0:43:32.920 --> 0:43:36.879
<v Speaker 1>from a duck bill dinosaur nestling in the species is

0:43:37.080 --> 0:43:43.960
<v Speaker 1>uh Hippacrosaurus Stebben Jerry revealed micro structures morphologically consistent with

0:43:44.080 --> 0:43:50.040
<v Speaker 1>nuclei and chromosomes in cells within calcified cartilage. We hypothesize

0:43:50.080 --> 0:43:56.040
<v Speaker 1>that this exceptional cellular preservation extended to the molecular level

0:43:56.080 --> 0:44:00.719
<v Speaker 1>and had molecular features in common with extant A V cartilage.

0:44:00.960 --> 0:44:04.000
<v Speaker 1>So this is a duck build dinosaur. It's another Montana

0:44:04.040 --> 0:44:06.840
<v Speaker 1>special discovered in the nineteen eighties. It would have been

0:44:06.880 --> 0:44:09.800
<v Speaker 1>a nest of young duck build herbivores that all died

0:44:09.920 --> 0:44:14.360
<v Speaker 1>sometime around seventy five million years ago, and the paleontologists

0:44:14.400 --> 0:44:18.400
<v Speaker 1>here were examining skull shards from these juveniles, and the

0:44:18.440 --> 0:44:20.880
<v Speaker 1>shards would have been made out of cartilage rather than

0:44:20.920 --> 0:44:25.640
<v Speaker 1>out of bone. But when examining these cartilage skull shards

0:44:25.640 --> 0:44:29.600
<v Speaker 1>are the remains of them? Uh. The researchers believe that

0:44:29.680 --> 0:44:34.040
<v Speaker 1>they discovered signs of intact cell nuclei and DNA within

0:44:34.120 --> 0:44:37.200
<v Speaker 1>these fragments, But then again, I want to say a

0:44:37.239 --> 0:44:41.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of paleontologists are skeptical about this supposed find. Of course,

0:44:41.239 --> 0:44:45.040
<v Speaker 1>there's the theoretical limitation on how long DNA would last,

0:44:45.160 --> 0:44:48.360
<v Speaker 1>or at least disbelieved to last on a molecular basis.

0:44:48.440 --> 0:44:51.480
<v Speaker 1>But I was also reading a piece by a University

0:44:51.520 --> 0:44:55.680
<v Speaker 1>of Bristol vertebrate paleontologist named Michael Benton, who thinks it's

0:44:55.800 --> 0:44:58.920
<v Speaker 1>more likely that if there is any actual DNA in

0:44:58.920 --> 0:45:02.879
<v Speaker 1>this sample, it came from recent external contamination, not from

0:45:02.880 --> 0:45:05.000
<v Speaker 1>a dinosaur. So I guess we'll have to wait and

0:45:05.000 --> 0:45:08.719
<v Speaker 1>see what happens there with follow up research. But I

0:45:08.760 --> 0:45:13.120
<v Speaker 1>don't know. That's interesting and he gives us some hope, right,

0:45:13.360 --> 0:45:15.080
<v Speaker 1>But I've got to bring it back to the moa. So,

0:45:15.200 --> 0:45:17.799
<v Speaker 1>whatever the truth about DNA from millions of years ago,

0:45:17.920 --> 0:45:21.919
<v Speaker 1>as unlikely as that seems, the MOA has existed much

0:45:22.000 --> 0:45:24.600
<v Speaker 1>more recently, and for that reason, the idea of recovering

0:45:24.640 --> 0:45:27.640
<v Speaker 1>the genome of the moa and bringing a species of

0:45:27.680 --> 0:45:31.040
<v Speaker 1>moa back from extinction is much more plausible by orders

0:45:31.040 --> 0:45:35.960
<v Speaker 1>of magnitude. So back to that Sharon Begley article from

0:45:36.040 --> 0:45:38.279
<v Speaker 1>she writes about how there's a team of researchers based

0:45:38.280 --> 0:45:41.480
<v Speaker 1>out of Harvard University that we're able to assemble an

0:45:41.560 --> 0:45:45.560
<v Speaker 1>almost complete genome for our old friend we mentioned in

0:45:45.560 --> 0:45:47.600
<v Speaker 1>the last episode, and I think earlier in this one,

0:45:47.640 --> 0:45:51.279
<v Speaker 1>the little bush moa or a nomal opterics did aform us.

0:45:51.680 --> 0:45:53.920
<v Speaker 1>So these again would not be the biggest ones. These

0:45:53.960 --> 0:45:57.400
<v Speaker 1>are not the towering moa. These would be the smaller variety.

0:45:57.440 --> 0:45:59.200
<v Speaker 1>But I would not be surprised if they could still

0:45:59.280 --> 0:46:01.480
<v Speaker 1>kick your throat out. You know, there probably were some

0:46:01.520 --> 0:46:04.840
<v Speaker 1>tough little customers as we were talking about earlier, the

0:46:05.160 --> 0:46:08.560
<v Speaker 1>little bush moa when extinct in the thirteenth century. Now,

0:46:08.600 --> 0:46:11.560
<v Speaker 1>this work was dependent on DNA extracted from the tow

0:46:11.640 --> 0:46:14.200
<v Speaker 1>bone of a moa that was housed in the Royal

0:46:14.239 --> 0:46:17.239
<v Speaker 1>Ontario Museum in Toronto. And this kind of reconstruction is

0:46:17.280 --> 0:46:20.239
<v Speaker 1>not easy at all, because, well, you can extract a

0:46:20.280 --> 0:46:25.640
<v Speaker 1>lot of genetic information the physical genome, like the chromosomes

0:46:25.640 --> 0:46:27.920
<v Speaker 1>are often kind of shattered, so you have to figure

0:46:27.960 --> 0:46:31.080
<v Speaker 1>out how all the pieces of information that you've extracted

0:46:31.080 --> 0:46:35.440
<v Speaker 1>fit together into a broader chromosomal structure. And as with

0:46:35.480 --> 0:46:38.040
<v Speaker 1>other assemblies of this kind, the researchers here looked into

0:46:38.040 --> 0:46:41.520
<v Speaker 1>the genomes of living relatives for clues, basing the reconstruction

0:46:41.560 --> 0:46:44.360
<v Speaker 1>of the pieces on the reference template of an emu,

0:46:44.480 --> 0:46:47.440
<v Speaker 1>kind of like how mammoth reconstruction would be based on

0:46:47.480 --> 0:46:51.040
<v Speaker 1>the genome of of living elephants and things like that. Now,

0:46:51.080 --> 0:46:53.680
<v Speaker 1>at the time of Begley's article, there were several experts

0:46:53.680 --> 0:46:56.640
<v Speaker 1>in the field who praised the work. A Morton Allen Toft,

0:46:56.680 --> 0:46:59.160
<v Speaker 1>who we were talking about several times, uh he called

0:46:59.200 --> 0:47:03.279
<v Speaker 1>it a significant step forward. Also, the evolutionary molecular biologist

0:47:03.320 --> 0:47:06.160
<v Speaker 1>Beth Shapiro of you see Santa Cruz praise the research,

0:47:06.480 --> 0:47:11.440
<v Speaker 1>there was one concerning feature. So this paper was published

0:47:11.440 --> 0:47:14.960
<v Speaker 1>on bio archive, which is a non peer reviewed preprint server.

0:47:15.480 --> 0:47:18.040
<v Speaker 1>It's so it's like, nothing wrong with something going up

0:47:18.080 --> 0:47:20.400
<v Speaker 1>on there. It's a place to post research for public

0:47:20.440 --> 0:47:23.680
<v Speaker 1>access and review before it gets published in a journal.

0:47:24.040 --> 0:47:26.280
<v Speaker 1>But I was unable to find evidence of this paper

0:47:26.320 --> 0:47:28.920
<v Speaker 1>appearing in an actual journal since then, So I'm not

0:47:28.960 --> 0:47:32.160
<v Speaker 1>sure what that means. Uh, maybe it doesn't mean anything,

0:47:32.280 --> 0:47:34.799
<v Speaker 1>or maybe it means something about this genome assembly didn't

0:47:34.840 --> 0:47:37.279
<v Speaker 1>hold up to scrutiny. I guess. I guess we'll have

0:47:37.320 --> 0:47:40.680
<v Speaker 1>to wait and see. But either way, the recent disappearance

0:47:40.719 --> 0:47:43.280
<v Speaker 1>of the MOI I think absolutely makes them a potential

0:47:43.320 --> 0:47:46.839
<v Speaker 1>candidate for de extinction, and this research helps move things

0:47:46.920 --> 0:47:49.439
<v Speaker 1>in that direction. Now. Of course, just because we could

0:47:49.560 --> 0:47:52.239
<v Speaker 1>doesn't necessarily mean that we should. I I don't know.

0:47:52.640 --> 0:47:54.279
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if I have a position on the

0:47:54.320 --> 0:47:57.759
<v Speaker 1>ethics of the extinction overall, but uh, obviously that's a

0:47:57.840 --> 0:48:00.359
<v Speaker 1>question that should be considered before we bring the things

0:48:00.400 --> 0:48:03.040
<v Speaker 1>back and just set them loose at Disney World. But

0:48:03.160 --> 0:48:05.520
<v Speaker 1>what an attraction that would be at Disney World right,

0:48:05.560 --> 0:48:07.200
<v Speaker 1>you go up to the mickey, you get your picture

0:48:07.239 --> 0:48:09.160
<v Speaker 1>taken with the mickey. Then you go up to the moa,

0:48:09.400 --> 0:48:11.200
<v Speaker 1>you try to get your picture taken. You see if

0:48:11.200 --> 0:48:15.200
<v Speaker 1>it cooperates. Yeah, danger zone for sure. But it's like

0:48:15.239 --> 0:48:18.560
<v Speaker 1>what if what if Jnald Duck could kick? What if

0:48:18.560 --> 0:48:22.400
<v Speaker 1>you the Mighty Glotto? Yeah? I mean there's so many

0:48:22.840 --> 0:48:27.239
<v Speaker 1>factors to consider and potentially reintroducing a creature like this,

0:48:27.600 --> 0:48:31.640
<v Speaker 1>you know, even if it's feasible to to bring them back,

0:48:31.680 --> 0:48:35.440
<v Speaker 1>because again, you're you're, to a certain extent doing what

0:48:35.640 --> 0:48:38.720
<v Speaker 1>all these different waves of interference have done in the past.

0:48:38.800 --> 0:48:41.479
<v Speaker 1>You're taking the environment and you're shaking it up again.

0:48:41.560 --> 0:48:44.120
<v Speaker 1>You're you're adding something to it, even if it's something

0:48:44.160 --> 0:48:48.040
<v Speaker 1>that used to be there in some form. Um. It's uh,

0:48:48.080 --> 0:48:50.680
<v Speaker 1>it's a difficult equation. And then I imagine also there's

0:48:50.719 --> 0:48:53.319
<v Speaker 1>the argument of is this the best use of our

0:48:53.360 --> 0:48:56.800
<v Speaker 1>our energy towards Should we instead be focusing on creatures

0:48:56.800 --> 0:48:59.040
<v Speaker 1>that are still with us, that can be um that

0:48:59.120 --> 0:49:01.880
<v Speaker 1>can be saved, or creatures that are saying extinct in

0:49:01.880 --> 0:49:04.640
<v Speaker 1>the wild but can still be reintroduced. I mean a

0:49:04.640 --> 0:49:07.200
<v Speaker 1>lot of those are you know, entirely separate battles, so

0:49:07.360 --> 0:49:11.399
<v Speaker 1>that you know that you know, certainly involved genetics. But um, yeah,

0:49:11.440 --> 0:49:14.360
<v Speaker 1>it's it's it's it's a complex situation. It's not just

0:49:14.400 --> 0:49:15.960
<v Speaker 1>a matter of oh, well we can bring it back,

0:49:16.040 --> 0:49:19.120
<v Speaker 1>let's do it. MOA's everywhere. I'm just saying, if we

0:49:19.120 --> 0:49:22.000
<v Speaker 1>were going to make a park with de extinctive animals,

0:49:22.520 --> 0:49:28.120
<v Speaker 1>maybe maybe extinct giant birds rather than dinosaurs. Since you

0:49:28.120 --> 0:49:31.279
<v Speaker 1>can't do the non Abean dinosaurs, why not terror birds

0:49:31.280 --> 0:49:34.279
<v Speaker 1>in MOA's. Without a doubt, I would. I would love

0:49:34.480 --> 0:49:38.000
<v Speaker 1>to see one of these creatures in real life. They

0:49:38.080 --> 0:49:42.120
<v Speaker 1>just sound amazing. It's you know, to see these these

0:49:42.160 --> 0:49:48.319
<v Speaker 1>two legged organisms handling about, uh munchtioned on twigs and branches. Uh.

0:49:49.480 --> 0:49:52.719
<v Speaker 1>It would be beautiful, provided you know there was there

0:49:52.800 --> 0:49:54.960
<v Speaker 1>was the space for it. Um So, I don't know.

0:49:54.960 --> 0:49:56.400
<v Speaker 1>It would be interesting to see what happens with this.

0:49:56.480 --> 0:49:59.560
<v Speaker 1>I know it's been it's been brought up before sometimes

0:49:59.560 --> 0:50:03.480
<v Speaker 1>I think by politicians even um and it's been kind

0:50:03.480 --> 0:50:06.320
<v Speaker 1>of controversial. There's a New Zealand politician who for some

0:50:06.400 --> 0:50:09.560
<v Speaker 1>reason has been very in favor of bringing back the moa.

0:50:09.719 --> 0:50:13.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm not sure why. By the way, I just looked

0:50:13.040 --> 0:50:16.359
<v Speaker 1>it up Unfortunately, the terror birds appeared to be just

0:50:16.480 --> 0:50:20.040
<v Speaker 1>out of range. Given the figures we were citing earlier,

0:50:20.080 --> 0:50:22.799
<v Speaker 1>I think they went extinct probably around one point eight

0:50:22.840 --> 0:50:27.120
<v Speaker 1>million years ago. Ah, well, there you go, the moas

0:50:27.200 --> 0:50:31.680
<v Speaker 1>it is then MOA's elephant birds. Anything else you know

0:50:31.760 --> 0:50:35.040
<v Speaker 1>within within reach that would have to those would have

0:50:35.080 --> 0:50:37.160
<v Speaker 1>to be the main attractions at our park. Give me

0:50:37.160 --> 0:50:41.279
<v Speaker 1>a host eagle baby, Oh yeah, for for sure. All right,

0:50:41.600 --> 0:50:43.879
<v Speaker 1>So there you have it are two part look at

0:50:44.080 --> 0:50:46.759
<v Speaker 1>the Moa, The Rise of the Moa, the Twilight of

0:50:46.800 --> 0:50:49.040
<v Speaker 1>the Moa. I found this to be just a really

0:50:50.160 --> 0:50:54.560
<v Speaker 1>engrossing UH project to work on because it ends up,

0:50:54.600 --> 0:50:57.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, dealing with so many things you're dealing with,

0:50:56.800 --> 0:51:01.799
<v Speaker 1>uh with biology, evolution of of organisms, you're dealing with

0:51:02.320 --> 0:51:06.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, the history of human migration, uh, colonial disruption,

0:51:06.880 --> 0:51:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and then the possibility of of bringing an extinct creature

0:51:09.920 --> 0:51:13.200
<v Speaker 1>back to life through genetic science. Uh. It really has

0:51:13.239 --> 0:51:17.920
<v Speaker 1>everything spared no expense. Yeah all right, So obviously we

0:51:18.040 --> 0:51:19.640
<v Speaker 1>love to hear from everyone out there. I also know

0:51:19.680 --> 0:51:22.080
<v Speaker 1>that we have you know, we have plenty of listeners

0:51:22.440 --> 0:51:25.520
<v Speaker 1>who live in New Zealand and who have traveled to

0:51:25.560 --> 0:51:28.200
<v Speaker 1>New Zealand or have some sort of roots or connection

0:51:28.239 --> 0:51:31.000
<v Speaker 1>to New Zealand. We would love to hear from you

0:51:31.040 --> 0:51:33.920
<v Speaker 1>about this topic. What are your thoughts about the moa

0:51:34.360 --> 0:51:37.160
<v Speaker 1>uh and what you have to add to our discussion here.

0:51:37.520 --> 0:51:40.680
<v Speaker 1>What are your thoughts about being called Kiwi's? Oh yeah, yeah,

0:51:40.920 --> 0:51:43.120
<v Speaker 1>I would. I would love to hear from actual uh

0:51:43.280 --> 0:51:45.920
<v Speaker 1>New Zealand residents on the matter. Would they rather be

0:51:45.960 --> 0:51:53.400
<v Speaker 1>called MOA's Mm hmm, Sorry, I mean both of the

0:51:53.480 --> 0:51:57.200
<v Speaker 1>names of birds, so I don't know. In the meantime,

0:51:57.200 --> 0:51:58.919
<v Speaker 1>if you want to check out other episodes of Stuff

0:51:58.960 --> 0:52:01.080
<v Speaker 1>to Blow Your Mind, you know where to find them

0:52:01.080 --> 0:52:04.080
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcasts and wherever that happens to be.

0:52:04.520 --> 0:52:08.359
<v Speaker 1>Make sure you rate, review and subscribe. Huge thanks as

0:52:08.360 --> 0:52:11.880
<v Speaker 1>always to our excellent audio producer Seth Nicholas Johnson, who's

0:52:11.920 --> 0:52:14.760
<v Speaker 1>doing a heroic job of helping us cope with recording

0:52:14.800 --> 0:52:18.279
<v Speaker 1>from home, so so big shout out to Seth. If

0:52:18.280 --> 0:52:20.240
<v Speaker 1>you'd like to get in touch with us with feedback

0:52:20.280 --> 0:52:22.920
<v Speaker 1>on this episode or any other, to suggest a topic

0:52:22.960 --> 0:52:25.040
<v Speaker 1>for the future, just to say hi, you can email

0:52:25.120 --> 0:52:36.040
<v Speaker 1>us at contact at stuff to Blow your Mind dot com.

0:52:36.120 --> 0:52:38.600
<v Speaker 1>Stuff to Blow Your Mind is production of I Heart Radio.

0:52:38.960 --> 0:52:41.280
<v Speaker 1>For more podcasts. For my heart Radio, visit the iHeart

0:52:41.360 --> 0:52:44.080
<v Speaker 1>Radio app, Apple podcasts, or wherever you're listening to your

0:52:44.080 --> 0:53:02.080
<v Speaker 1>favorite shows. God bldiostats my pet Pee,