WEBVTT - #266 Packers Unscripted: Last chance

0:00:00.760 --> 0:00:20.520
<v Speaker 1>Hi, everyone, Welcome to Packers Unscripted from Packers dot Com.

0:00:20.560 --> 0:00:23.360
<v Speaker 1>I am Mike Spofford and he is my trusted colleague,

0:00:23.400 --> 0:00:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Wes Hodkowitz. Were coming to you here from our studios

0:00:26.680 --> 0:00:30.440
<v Speaker 1>at lambeau Field and West. Super Bowl weekend is almost

0:00:30.560 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>upon us, and with regards to Super Bowl weekend in Minneapolis,

0:00:34.760 --> 0:00:39.960
<v Speaker 1>the biggest news for Packers fans will occur on Saturday

0:00:40.000 --> 0:00:44.199
<v Speaker 1>evening because we will find out whether or not, at

0:00:44.280 --> 0:00:49.159
<v Speaker 1>long last, if Jerry Kramer will be inducted into the

0:00:49.200 --> 0:00:51.320
<v Speaker 1>Hall of Fame. Those decisions on the Hall of Fame

0:00:51.360 --> 0:00:54.440
<v Speaker 1>class are made the night before the Super Bowl. They'll

0:00:54.440 --> 0:00:58.280
<v Speaker 1>be announced on the NFL Honors Show on Saturday evening.

0:00:58.640 --> 0:01:01.880
<v Speaker 1>The inductions then would take place the following summer. Jerry Kramer,

0:01:02.680 --> 0:01:05.880
<v Speaker 1>for the eleventh time, is a finalist for the Hall

0:01:05.880 --> 0:01:10.000
<v Speaker 1>of Fame, the second time as a Senior Committee nominee.

0:01:10.400 --> 0:01:14.360
<v Speaker 1>And I know you and I share the same opinion

0:01:14.400 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 1>on this. It's got to happen now. Well, and here's

0:01:16.920 --> 0:01:19.200
<v Speaker 1>the It absolutely has to happen now. I mean, this

0:01:19.319 --> 0:01:21.959
<v Speaker 1>is it. Um. Jerry just turned eighty two years old

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:25.000
<v Speaker 1>last week, I believe so, uh, this is his final crack,

0:01:25.080 --> 0:01:28.720
<v Speaker 1>probably um. And here's the thing about this, this argument,

0:01:28.720 --> 0:01:30.880
<v Speaker 1>because I've heard it for a number of years, as

0:01:30.880 --> 0:01:32.920
<v Speaker 1>long as I've been covering the Packers, it's really hit

0:01:32.959 --> 0:01:35.160
<v Speaker 1>fever pitch and I don't know what it was like

0:01:36.200 --> 0:01:38.640
<v Speaker 1>the last time he was up as a senior finalist

0:01:38.720 --> 0:01:41.480
<v Speaker 1>and the conversation, what the narrative it was like. But

0:01:41.600 --> 0:01:44.120
<v Speaker 1>here's my argument. I laid it out an Insider inbox

0:01:44.240 --> 0:01:48.920
<v Speaker 1>on Thursday. Jerry Kramer stopped playing football fifty years ago,

0:01:49.280 --> 0:01:53.240
<v Speaker 1>be retired. This is still a topic. This is still

0:01:53.320 --> 0:01:55.720
<v Speaker 1>something from when he was thirty two years old, when

0:01:55.720 --> 0:01:58.000
<v Speaker 1>he was eighty two years old, that remains in the

0:01:58.000 --> 0:02:01.760
<v Speaker 1>public domain. I don't want to get into the minds

0:02:01.760 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 1>of Hall of Fame voters or why we're at the

0:02:03.480 --> 0:02:07.160
<v Speaker 1>point that we are, But if popular opinion, if overwhelming

0:02:07.360 --> 0:02:11.640
<v Speaker 1>public sentiment has us to this point, why is this

0:02:11.720 --> 0:02:16.079
<v Speaker 1>still a debate? It's an honest question because it's it's like,

0:02:16.560 --> 0:02:22.080
<v Speaker 1>are we doing what is right for the game of football?

0:02:22.520 --> 0:02:24.520
<v Speaker 1>And I think there's a lot of Pro Football Hall

0:02:24.560 --> 0:02:26.560
<v Speaker 1>of Fame voters, and I know several of them that

0:02:26.680 --> 0:02:28.679
<v Speaker 1>feel like everything up to this point has done that.

0:02:29.600 --> 0:02:31.240
<v Speaker 1>But it just seems to me that if this is

0:02:31.280 --> 0:02:35.120
<v Speaker 1>still a topic in two thousand, eighteen, fifty years after

0:02:35.320 --> 0:02:40.760
<v Speaker 1>he retired. Something in the program didn't work. And I

0:02:40.760 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 1>think that's why, as I said this Saturday night, the

0:02:44.800 --> 0:02:46.600
<v Speaker 1>Pro Football Hall of Fame voters have a chance to

0:02:46.639 --> 0:02:49.080
<v Speaker 1>write one of the game's biggest wrongs. Yeah, and I

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:52.359
<v Speaker 1>simplify this in a different way, because you're talking about

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:55.640
<v Speaker 1>that fifty years have gone by a perfectly and I

0:02:55.720 --> 0:02:59.079
<v Speaker 1>like the way you phrase that, a perfectly valid way

0:02:59.120 --> 0:03:01.200
<v Speaker 1>to think about it. I go back to the very

0:03:01.240 --> 0:03:04.520
<v Speaker 1>beginning in the way I simplify this, and that you

0:03:04.520 --> 0:03:07.000
<v Speaker 1>can talk about all the all the noise, and all

0:03:07.040 --> 0:03:09.400
<v Speaker 1>the reasons and all the comparisons and this and that.

0:03:10.480 --> 0:03:13.560
<v Speaker 1>But back in the beginning, essentially nineteen sixty nine, Jerry

0:03:13.639 --> 0:03:16.840
<v Speaker 1>Kramer was one of fifteen players fifteen players in the

0:03:16.919 --> 0:03:20.400
<v Speaker 1>league voted by the Hall of Fame voters onto the

0:03:20.480 --> 0:03:25.280
<v Speaker 1>NFL's fiftieth anniversary team. One of fifteen players. Fourteen of

0:03:25.320 --> 0:03:27.800
<v Speaker 1>those fifteen are in the Hall of Fame. Jerry Kramer

0:03:27.919 --> 0:03:30.320
<v Speaker 1>is the only one who is not. And if you

0:03:30.320 --> 0:03:33.240
<v Speaker 1>want to compare the number of all pros, and there's

0:03:33.280 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 1>the talk about, oh, there's too many Lombardi Packers in

0:03:35.560 --> 0:03:37.800
<v Speaker 1>the Hall of Fame. I mean, I just I'm sorry.

0:03:37.880 --> 0:03:40.360
<v Speaker 1>I toss all of it out, because if the guy

0:03:40.520 --> 0:03:44.480
<v Speaker 1>was voted to the NFL's fiftieth anniversary team, why is

0:03:44.520 --> 0:03:46.360
<v Speaker 1>he not in the Hall of Fame. It just to me,

0:03:46.520 --> 0:03:48.960
<v Speaker 1>it absolutely doesn't make sense if he was good enough

0:03:49.000 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 1>from that the same type of voters. And I realized

0:03:52.080 --> 0:03:54.160
<v Speaker 1>that people on the committee change over the years, but

0:03:54.200 --> 0:03:57.800
<v Speaker 1>if the same essentially the same voting body voted into

0:03:57.800 --> 0:04:01.560
<v Speaker 1>that fiftieth anniversary team, how can you know all these

0:04:01.600 --> 0:04:04.120
<v Speaker 1>these ten times as a finalist later he not get

0:04:04.160 --> 0:04:06.400
<v Speaker 1>the votes to get in. I don't understand it. And

0:04:06.400 --> 0:04:08.280
<v Speaker 1>I think you bring up a good point, Mike, because

0:04:08.720 --> 0:04:11.000
<v Speaker 1>it is the way that I view this thing. I honestly,

0:04:11.040 --> 0:04:12.840
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and eighteen, I don't view this as

0:04:12.880 --> 0:04:15.560
<v Speaker 1>a referendum on Jerry Kramer, as strange as it sounds,

0:04:15.560 --> 0:04:18.359
<v Speaker 1>because he's the one that's up to be a candidate

0:04:18.560 --> 0:04:21.440
<v Speaker 1>and inducting in the ProFootball of Fame. I honestly, and

0:04:21.480 --> 0:04:22.880
<v Speaker 1>I'll say this to all my friends that are on

0:04:22.920 --> 0:04:25.960
<v Speaker 1>that voting panel, I honestly think this is a referendum

0:04:25.960 --> 0:04:28.080
<v Speaker 1>on the Pro Football Hall of Fame. Itself, because I

0:04:28.080 --> 0:04:30.640
<v Speaker 1>think for too long the conversation about has been about

0:04:31.040 --> 0:04:34.159
<v Speaker 1>why Jerry Kramer doesn't deserve to get in, rather than

0:04:34.880 --> 0:04:37.400
<v Speaker 1>why are we standing in the way of it? And

0:04:37.440 --> 0:04:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I think a part of it is that not enough

0:04:39.400 --> 0:04:41.039
<v Speaker 1>people have gone to bat for him over the years.

0:04:41.040 --> 0:04:43.400
<v Speaker 1>And I commend his daughter, Alicia, I commend his family

0:04:43.800 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 1>for continuing to push his cause because you know how

0:04:46.480 --> 0:04:49.800
<v Speaker 1>Kramer is. For as much as you know the Instant

0:04:49.839 --> 0:04:53.040
<v Speaker 1>replaybook and things like that, people at times criticized him

0:04:53.080 --> 0:04:57.440
<v Speaker 1>for his outspokenness on certain different avenues. He's really not

0:04:57.520 --> 0:04:59.800
<v Speaker 1>a big self promoter in regards the pro football fame.

0:04:59.800 --> 0:05:02.800
<v Speaker 1>You talk to him earlier this year, he doesn't want

0:05:02.800 --> 0:05:04.880
<v Speaker 1>to talk about absolutes and I need I deserve to

0:05:04.920 --> 0:05:07.120
<v Speaker 1>be in. It's always been about I'm gonna be happy

0:05:07.400 --> 0:05:09.560
<v Speaker 1>at the end of the day if it happens. It happens,

0:05:09.560 --> 0:05:11.040
<v Speaker 1>if it doesn't, it's not going to change the way

0:05:11.040 --> 0:05:13.200
<v Speaker 1>I live. And I'll be honest with you, Mike, I

0:05:13.240 --> 0:05:16.440
<v Speaker 1>just feel like after this amount of time that if

0:05:16.480 --> 0:05:19.359
<v Speaker 1>we're still talking about this western Hockwitz, who wasn't born

0:05:20.040 --> 0:05:25.600
<v Speaker 1>in n Let six is in this conversation, it should

0:05:25.640 --> 0:05:27.480
<v Speaker 1>have ended a long time ago. Yeah, And I commend

0:05:27.560 --> 0:05:30.760
<v Speaker 1>Jerry Kramer frankly for the way he's handled this over

0:05:30.800 --> 0:05:34.080
<v Speaker 1>the years because I've I've had multiple conversations with him

0:05:34.120 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>about it, um for interviews on packers dot Com and whatnot.

0:05:38.800 --> 0:05:43.520
<v Speaker 1>And his his answer up until this latest opportunity now

0:05:43.560 --> 0:05:46.000
<v Speaker 1>to be a finalist again, his answer has always been,

0:05:46.800 --> 0:05:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the NFL has been so good to me and given

0:05:49.000 --> 0:05:52.239
<v Speaker 1>me so much in my life, because it hasn't given

0:05:52.279 --> 0:05:55.080
<v Speaker 1>me this one thing. I'm not going to let that

0:05:55.279 --> 0:05:57.640
<v Speaker 1>ruin everything. I'm not going to let that, you know,

0:05:57.800 --> 0:06:01.200
<v Speaker 1>affect me on a daily basis as as as as

0:06:01.200 --> 0:06:02.920
<v Speaker 1>he goes about it. And as you said, now it's

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:05.840
<v Speaker 1>been fifty years since he's been retired, it's been twenty

0:06:05.920 --> 0:06:09.440
<v Speaker 1>years since he was last a finalist in via the

0:06:09.480 --> 0:06:14.600
<v Speaker 1>Seniors Committee. Um, you know, I would I I personally

0:06:14.720 --> 0:06:17.839
<v Speaker 1>for him, would hate to see him go through this

0:06:18.120 --> 0:06:20.640
<v Speaker 1>again and not get it. I mean, it would almost

0:06:20.680 --> 0:06:22.039
<v Speaker 1>be better if he's not going to get it. It It

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:23.800
<v Speaker 1>would almost be better if he had never come up

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:27.680
<v Speaker 1>as a finalist again. In becomes the last chapter. So

0:06:27.760 --> 0:06:30.799
<v Speaker 1>I'm really hoping on a personal level for Jerry Kramer.

0:06:31.120 --> 0:06:33.080
<v Speaker 1>Referendum on the Pro Football Hall of Fame and all

0:06:33.120 --> 0:06:35.479
<v Speaker 1>that aside, which I agree with. For Jerry on a

0:06:35.520 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 1>personal level, he's got to get it. There's a human

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:39.160
<v Speaker 1>being involved with this at the end of the day.

0:06:39.160 --> 0:06:40.800
<v Speaker 1>And I want to point out two more things here

0:06:40.839 --> 0:06:42.039
<v Speaker 1>because I know we're gonna have to get to a

0:06:42.080 --> 0:06:44.960
<v Speaker 1>break Pro Football of Fame is about guys who changed

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:47.880
<v Speaker 1>the game, right, Yeah, that's that's who is supposed to

0:06:47.880 --> 0:06:50.919
<v Speaker 1>be included in this illustrious group. You can talk about

0:06:50.920 --> 0:06:52.560
<v Speaker 1>the sweep, you can talk about the fact he was

0:06:52.600 --> 0:06:55.080
<v Speaker 1>a place kicker. I mean, there's so many different things

0:06:55.080 --> 0:06:57.640
<v Speaker 1>that you can mention in terms of what his credentials are.

0:06:57.680 --> 0:06:59.600
<v Speaker 1>That the team that you mentioned, the Pro Bowls, the

0:06:59.640 --> 0:07:02.120
<v Speaker 1>All pre Os. The other thing I go back to

0:07:02.120 --> 0:07:04.720
<v Speaker 1>two is that he is one of the greatest ambassadors

0:07:04.920 --> 0:07:07.440
<v Speaker 1>of Green Bay Packers football. Whether it was in the

0:07:07.480 --> 0:07:09.800
<v Speaker 1>sixties or whether it's been in the two thousand's, he

0:07:10.000 --> 0:07:12.520
<v Speaker 1>is the face along with bart Starting a number of

0:07:12.520 --> 0:07:14.040
<v Speaker 1>other people, but he is one of the faces of

0:07:14.080 --> 0:07:16.360
<v Speaker 1>that generation of Packers and I just think that has

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:18.600
<v Speaker 1>to come for something. Yeah, I think so too. With that,

0:07:18.640 --> 0:07:19.960
<v Speaker 1>we do have to go to a break back with

0:07:20.000 --> 0:07:40.560
<v Speaker 1>more and Packers unscripted. Right after this Welcome Back to

0:07:40.640 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 1>Packers unscripted, Mike Spofford alongside West, hod Kowitz and West,

0:07:44.480 --> 0:07:47.520
<v Speaker 1>continuing our discussion of the upcoming Hall of Fame announcement.

0:07:47.560 --> 0:07:50.960
<v Speaker 1>To put Jerry Kramer's case aside for a minute. You've

0:07:50.960 --> 0:07:55.600
<v Speaker 1>got fifteen finalists for a maximum of five spots in

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:59.000
<v Speaker 1>what they call the Modern Era class for the Hall

0:07:59.040 --> 0:08:02.440
<v Speaker 1>of Fame. Kramer is a Senior Committee nominee. His case

0:08:02.520 --> 0:08:06.080
<v Speaker 1>is considered separately, just so people understand. When you look

0:08:06.080 --> 0:08:08.880
<v Speaker 1>at this group of fifteen finalists, maximum of five can

0:08:08.920 --> 0:08:13.320
<v Speaker 1>be chosen to be inducted. To me, this looks like

0:08:13.520 --> 0:08:16.480
<v Speaker 1>a tough class to crack. In the sense of what

0:08:16.520 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 1>I mean by that is, Brian er, Lacker, Ray Lewis,

0:08:19.880 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>and Randy Moss are all eligible for the first time

0:08:24.040 --> 0:08:26.000
<v Speaker 1>to get into the Hall of Fame. I think all

0:08:26.080 --> 0:08:28.200
<v Speaker 1>three of them are Hall of Famers and have a

0:08:28.320 --> 0:08:30.160
<v Speaker 1>very good chance of getting in. And then you add

0:08:30.240 --> 0:08:34.080
<v Speaker 1>Terrell Owens, who came like one or two votes away

0:08:34.280 --> 0:08:37.120
<v Speaker 1>last year from getting in. That right, there might be

0:08:37.200 --> 0:08:39.520
<v Speaker 1>four of the five in this class. Now, there are

0:08:39.559 --> 0:08:43.640
<v Speaker 1>some voters who don't necessarily always fully support guys the

0:08:43.679 --> 0:08:46.440
<v Speaker 1>first time they come up, they like to consider some

0:08:46.520 --> 0:08:48.120
<v Speaker 1>of the other guys who have been on the list

0:08:48.160 --> 0:08:51.680
<v Speaker 1>longer because they know that those guys who are newly

0:08:51.720 --> 0:08:55.120
<v Speaker 1>eligible basically have twenty five years potentially a twenty five

0:08:55.200 --> 0:08:58.120
<v Speaker 1>year window to get in. But that being said, those

0:08:58.280 --> 0:09:00.800
<v Speaker 1>those guys who are finalists and who are eligible for

0:09:00.840 --> 0:09:04.199
<v Speaker 1>the first time, those three plus Terrell Owens, that might

0:09:04.240 --> 0:09:07.160
<v Speaker 1>be of this Hall of Fame Modern era class, Yeah,

0:09:07.160 --> 0:09:08.719
<v Speaker 1>it very well might be. I mean, I look at

0:09:09.400 --> 0:09:11.719
<v Speaker 1>in my mind, I don't know how you can have

0:09:11.760 --> 0:09:13.560
<v Speaker 1>a Pro Football Hall of Fame class this year that

0:09:13.640 --> 0:09:15.760
<v Speaker 1>definitely doesn't have Ray Lewis and Brian or Lacker, and

0:09:15.800 --> 0:09:18.600
<v Speaker 1>I just think those guys completely changed the game. Randy

0:09:18.640 --> 0:09:21.960
<v Speaker 1>Mossa had just a phenomenal career, and then obviously that

0:09:22.040 --> 0:09:24.600
<v Speaker 1>resurgence with the New England Patriots that I kind of

0:09:24.640 --> 0:09:27.120
<v Speaker 1>like in a little bit to what Charles Woodson had

0:09:27.160 --> 0:09:29.760
<v Speaker 1>with the Packers, where he probably had the credentials to

0:09:29.800 --> 0:09:31.439
<v Speaker 1>begin with, but that just puts it over the top.

0:09:31.520 --> 0:09:34.040
<v Speaker 1>The twenty three touchdowns that one season. I know it

0:09:34.040 --> 0:09:36.000
<v Speaker 1>it ended kind of quietly in two thousand and ten

0:09:36.000 --> 0:09:38.600
<v Speaker 1>and two thousand twelve, but I'm guessing if he didn't

0:09:38.600 --> 0:09:40.959
<v Speaker 1>actually end up coming back with the forty, he'd probably

0:09:41.000 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>be in the Hall of Fame already. Owens is such

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:46.200
<v Speaker 1>a unique case just because of the ups and downs

0:09:46.200 --> 0:09:49.160
<v Speaker 1>of his career and certainly trying to figure out, you know,

0:09:49.200 --> 0:09:51.600
<v Speaker 1>the balance between his physical athleticism and some of the

0:09:51.600 --> 0:09:55.080
<v Speaker 1>controversy that followed him. Uh. I basically, I'm putting it

0:09:55.080 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 1>down to this, I'm very curious outside of those top

0:09:57.360 --> 0:09:59.840
<v Speaker 1>three new candidates, who I think are all first ballot

0:09:59.840 --> 0:10:02.800
<v Speaker 1>Hall famers, who potentially fills out the rest of that

0:10:02.880 --> 0:10:06.080
<v Speaker 1>class some really good offensive linemen that deserves consideration. I

0:10:06.120 --> 0:10:09.160
<v Speaker 1>think several of them will eventually get in. Um. I

0:10:09.200 --> 0:10:10.920
<v Speaker 1>mean just it's all over the board right now in

0:10:11.040 --> 0:10:13.000
<v Speaker 1>terms of what they're going to be looking for. I

0:10:13.000 --> 0:10:14.960
<v Speaker 1>know so many times when I talk to these guys,

0:10:15.200 --> 0:10:17.440
<v Speaker 1>they mentioned how they wish it we were voting for

0:10:17.960 --> 0:10:20.840
<v Speaker 1>ten guys. You know that that what you have to

0:10:20.880 --> 0:10:23.920
<v Speaker 1>limit it to is so exclusive that it really makes

0:10:23.920 --> 0:10:26.040
<v Speaker 1>those decisions heart wrenching. Yeah. I think one of the

0:10:26.120 --> 0:10:28.480
<v Speaker 1>one of the cases to follow that's very interesting. I

0:10:28.520 --> 0:10:31.280
<v Speaker 1>was reading a little bit about is a former Dallas

0:10:31.280 --> 0:10:35.520
<v Speaker 1>Cowboys cornerback Everson Wats. He's a finalist. And what makes

0:10:35.600 --> 0:10:38.960
<v Speaker 1>his case really interesting is he's at the end, I believe,

0:10:39.080 --> 0:10:41.680
<v Speaker 1>of the twenty five year win or the twenty five

0:10:41.760 --> 0:10:44.920
<v Speaker 1>years since he retired. This is his last chance to

0:10:44.960 --> 0:10:47.960
<v Speaker 1>get in through the modern era process without having to

0:10:48.320 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>to go the senior route later on. And there's you know,

0:10:52.400 --> 0:10:55.200
<v Speaker 1>him getting to the finalist stage. Now at this point,

0:10:55.400 --> 0:10:57.760
<v Speaker 1>there's been you know, an uptick in the interest in

0:10:57.920 --> 0:11:00.440
<v Speaker 1>revisiting his career and what he did for was Tom

0:11:00.480 --> 0:11:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Landry Cowboys teams and what he did with, you know,

0:11:03.520 --> 0:11:06.480
<v Speaker 1>on a defense that also had some some other Hall

0:11:06.520 --> 0:11:09.080
<v Speaker 1>of Fame players like Randy White and Too Tall Jones

0:11:09.120 --> 0:11:11.120
<v Speaker 1>and and guys like that. I just I think his

0:11:11.360 --> 0:11:13.679
<v Speaker 1>I think his case is interesting. I remember watching him

0:11:13.679 --> 0:11:16.880
<v Speaker 1>play for the Cowboys on television as a kid. I

0:11:16.960 --> 0:11:18.640
<v Speaker 1>don't know, you know, I mean back then. I'm not

0:11:18.800 --> 0:11:20.960
<v Speaker 1>looking at these games thinking about who's going to be

0:11:21.000 --> 0:11:23.600
<v Speaker 1>in the Hall of Fame, but he was definitely an

0:11:23.679 --> 0:11:26.960
<v Speaker 1>upper echelon cornerback and uh. And I'll just be very

0:11:27.000 --> 0:11:29.839
<v Speaker 1>curious to see what happens with his case because this

0:11:29.880 --> 0:11:33.120
<v Speaker 1>is sort of his his last chance by the regular route. Yeah,

0:11:33.120 --> 0:11:34.840
<v Speaker 1>And I think the one thing that's really interesting to

0:11:34.960 --> 0:11:37.680
<v Speaker 1>Mike the last few years, it seems like the narrative

0:11:37.840 --> 0:11:40.680
<v Speaker 1>and sort of the argument for defensive backs has changed

0:11:40.720 --> 0:11:42.480
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. Yeah, when you look at not only

0:11:42.520 --> 0:11:44.720
<v Speaker 1>I mean, safeties are a position where have really been

0:11:44.720 --> 0:11:46.719
<v Speaker 1>difficult to gain traction. But to some extent, if you're

0:11:46.720 --> 0:11:49.080
<v Speaker 1>not Dion Sanders, it's been really tough to get the

0:11:49.080 --> 0:11:52.000
<v Speaker 1>cornerbacks in there as well at times, just because you know,

0:11:52.240 --> 0:11:55.600
<v Speaker 1>being able to judge who really was the true, uh

0:11:55.640 --> 0:11:58.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, elite of of those generations. And I'll be

0:11:58.240 --> 0:12:00.199
<v Speaker 1>honest with you, I don't know a whole lot abouts,

0:12:00.240 --> 0:12:02.400
<v Speaker 1>but I do know those defenses he played on in

0:12:02.480 --> 0:12:05.240
<v Speaker 1>Dallas and then obviously the New York Giants. Um, there's

0:12:05.280 --> 0:12:08.360
<v Speaker 1>some talent, some really talented players around him. UM, so

0:12:08.400 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 1>it will be interesting. This is I think probably the

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:13.080
<v Speaker 1>most difficult thing for a lot of these these voters

0:12:13.160 --> 0:12:15.400
<v Speaker 1>is that it really you can have that twenty five

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:17.120
<v Speaker 1>year window, as you said, where it's like, okay, well

0:12:17.400 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the first time, and he'll have another chance next year.

0:12:19.920 --> 0:12:22.040
<v Speaker 1>But when you get to the end of that, um,

0:12:22.080 --> 0:12:25.720
<v Speaker 1>you really have a decision to make again. He can

0:12:25.760 --> 0:12:28.160
<v Speaker 1>go into Kevin mill lies up, I mean, ty Law

0:12:28.280 --> 0:12:31.480
<v Speaker 1>is up. Edgar and James Joe Jacobe from the Washington

0:12:31.520 --> 0:12:33.520
<v Speaker 1>teams over the years. I think another guy to watch

0:12:33.559 --> 0:12:35.880
<v Speaker 1>too that I'll throw in is is Tony Boselli and

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:39.280
<v Speaker 1>say that because his career was cut short by injuries,

0:12:39.280 --> 0:12:42.040
<v Speaker 1>he was considered the premier left tackle in the game

0:12:42.160 --> 0:12:45.960
<v Speaker 1>during his time. The fact that that Terrell Davis got

0:12:46.000 --> 0:12:50.480
<v Speaker 1>in with the shorten it opens another door. Now. I

0:12:50.520 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 1>still think Terrell Davis getting in a lot of that

0:12:53.000 --> 0:12:56.360
<v Speaker 1>had to do with his postseason domin on top of

0:12:56.360 --> 0:12:58.320
<v Speaker 1>what he did in a in a shortened career in

0:12:58.320 --> 0:13:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the regular season, but the fact that he got in

0:13:00.720 --> 0:13:04.040
<v Speaker 1>it changes the perception on a guy like Basselli who

0:13:04.120 --> 0:13:05.840
<v Speaker 1>was at the top of his game and at the

0:13:05.880 --> 0:13:07.959
<v Speaker 1>top of the league but then didn't play as long

0:13:08.000 --> 0:13:10.080
<v Speaker 1>as other guys like a Sterling Sharp people for that

0:13:10.120 --> 0:13:11.920
<v Speaker 1>matter as well. Yeah, I mean the fact that he

0:13:11.960 --> 0:13:15.079
<v Speaker 1>only had really six seasons. He wasn't expansion picked then

0:13:15.080 --> 0:13:17.920
<v Speaker 1>by the Texans, Don Papers Texans. The hope was he'd

0:13:17.920 --> 0:13:20.040
<v Speaker 1>be able to, you know, put everything behind him and

0:13:20.120 --> 0:13:23.240
<v Speaker 1>keep playing. He didn't. Um, So it'll be very interesting

0:13:23.280 --> 0:13:25.480
<v Speaker 1>to see this year and if it happens, you know,

0:13:25.520 --> 0:13:28.040
<v Speaker 1>proceeding on the next year's how people view his career. Yeah, well,

0:13:28.080 --> 0:13:30.240
<v Speaker 1>we gotta get to another breakback with more on Packers

0:13:30.320 --> 0:13:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Unscripted right after this. Welcome back to Packers Unscripted. Mike

0:13:52.200 --> 0:13:54.840
<v Speaker 1>Spofford in this chair, Wes Hodkowits in that one, and West.

0:13:54.880 --> 0:13:57.240
<v Speaker 1>Since it is Super Bowl weekend upon us here, we

0:13:57.280 --> 0:13:59.640
<v Speaker 1>should probably talk about the Super Bowl has been a

0:13:59.679 --> 0:14:01.439
<v Speaker 1>lot of time. I'm talking about the Hall of Fame stuff,

0:14:01.440 --> 0:14:05.760
<v Speaker 1>which I think is interesting debate. But Eagles against the Patriots.

0:14:06.320 --> 0:14:10.320
<v Speaker 1>The overarching storyline here I think is really interesting in

0:14:10.400 --> 0:14:13.080
<v Speaker 1>the fact that you have Tom Brady and Bill Belichick

0:14:13.120 --> 0:14:16.959
<v Speaker 1>going for their sixth Super Bowl together against a team

0:14:16.960 --> 0:14:20.080
<v Speaker 1>that is searching for its first Super Bowl championship in

0:14:20.080 --> 0:14:22.920
<v Speaker 1>the Philadelphia Eagles, a team that has not won an

0:14:23.040 --> 0:14:25.800
<v Speaker 1>NFL title since the pre Super Bowl era, that being

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:29.680
<v Speaker 1>nineteen sixty. They beat Vince Lombardi's Packers at Franklin Field.

0:14:29.920 --> 0:14:32.880
<v Speaker 1>That turned out to be the only postseason loss of

0:14:32.960 --> 0:14:37.440
<v Speaker 1>Vince Lombardi's coaching career, by the way, but six the

0:14:37.520 --> 0:14:39.480
<v Speaker 1>last time the Eagles want a title. They're trying to

0:14:39.520 --> 0:14:42.400
<v Speaker 1>break that drought, and uh and the Patriots trying to

0:14:42.440 --> 0:14:45.880
<v Speaker 1>simply add to an impressive legacy for me, Mike, this

0:14:46.000 --> 0:14:48.280
<v Speaker 1>is one of the most intriguing Super Bowls I think

0:14:48.280 --> 0:14:50.280
<v Speaker 1>in recent memory. And the reason I say that is

0:14:50.320 --> 0:14:54.160
<v Speaker 1>because you have two imperfect teams vying for what I

0:14:54.160 --> 0:14:56.760
<v Speaker 1>think a lot of people refer to as perfection in

0:14:56.840 --> 0:14:58.440
<v Speaker 1>terms of winning the Super Bowl. And I say that

0:14:58.480 --> 0:15:01.360
<v Speaker 1>because you look at this this Patriots team and how

0:15:01.400 --> 0:15:03.160
<v Speaker 1>they've had to sort of pull it together on defense

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:04.960
<v Speaker 1>a little bit. I think they finished the regular season

0:15:04.960 --> 0:15:08.280
<v Speaker 1>like twenty seven and total defense, but you know the

0:15:08.320 --> 0:15:11.320
<v Speaker 1>way that they've kind of made the pieces fit in

0:15:11.400 --> 0:15:13.640
<v Speaker 1>the playoffs, and you know, you bring in James Harrison,

0:15:13.920 --> 0:15:16.440
<v Speaker 1>he's playing significant snaps after not being on the roster

0:15:16.840 --> 0:15:19.560
<v Speaker 1>a month ago. Kyle van Noy, who was sort of

0:15:19.600 --> 0:15:23.200
<v Speaker 1>a discarded seen as a bus player coming out of Detroit,

0:15:23.600 --> 0:15:26.320
<v Speaker 1>he ends up being there starting outside backer. Uh. And

0:15:26.360 --> 0:15:29.520
<v Speaker 1>then you look at Philadelphia. They lose Carson Wentz, they

0:15:29.560 --> 0:15:32.480
<v Speaker 1>have to turn to a backup the running backs. They've

0:15:32.480 --> 0:15:34.560
<v Speaker 1>had a carousel there throughout the course of the year,

0:15:34.680 --> 0:15:38.160
<v Speaker 1>lost their starting left tack, lost their starting left tackle. Um,

0:15:38.240 --> 0:15:42.880
<v Speaker 1>all those things together, you still have to pull it. Oh,

0:15:43.000 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 1>you have to be able to find a way. And

0:15:45.080 --> 0:15:47.440
<v Speaker 1>I think both of these teams have done it. To me.

0:15:47.960 --> 0:15:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I think you look at the Atlanta Falcons from a

0:15:50.680 --> 0:15:52.120
<v Speaker 1>year ago, you look at a lot of these teams.

0:15:52.680 --> 0:15:55.680
<v Speaker 1>It's not a guarantee you get back, so when you're there,

0:15:55.720 --> 0:15:57.120
<v Speaker 1>you have to make the most of it. I think

0:15:57.120 --> 0:15:59.640
<v Speaker 1>both of these teams. Whoever comes out on top ultimately

0:15:59.720 --> 0:16:02.120
<v Speaker 1>is the team from this particular season. Yeah. From a

0:16:02.200 --> 0:16:05.280
<v Speaker 1>chess match standpoint, what intrigues me about this game is

0:16:05.320 --> 0:16:08.040
<v Speaker 1>the fact that we saw in the NFC Championship game

0:16:08.120 --> 0:16:11.880
<v Speaker 1>the Eagles change the narrative. They changed the storyline with

0:16:11.960 --> 0:16:15.040
<v Speaker 1>what Nick Foles and that offense was able to do

0:16:15.080 --> 0:16:17.960
<v Speaker 1>against the Minnesota Vikings, the number one defense in the league,

0:16:17.960 --> 0:16:21.360
<v Speaker 1>that game plan with Doug Peterson, Frank Reich, that coaching staff,

0:16:21.400 --> 0:16:24.000
<v Speaker 1>what they put together, and the way it was executed

0:16:24.040 --> 0:16:27.520
<v Speaker 1>by those players to explode for that many points against

0:16:27.880 --> 0:16:31.320
<v Speaker 1>the top defense in the NFL. On the other side,

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:36.840
<v Speaker 1>the customary procedure, I guess you'd say for a Bill

0:16:36.880 --> 0:16:40.520
<v Speaker 1>Belichick defense, when he's got two weeks to prepare and

0:16:40.560 --> 0:16:43.400
<v Speaker 1>he's been in these super bowls before, is they come

0:16:43.400 --> 0:16:46.080
<v Speaker 1>out with defensive looks that have not been on film

0:16:46.120 --> 0:16:48.800
<v Speaker 1>that the other team cannot be prepared for they haven't

0:16:48.840 --> 0:16:51.840
<v Speaker 1>seen it before, and that offense has to be able

0:16:51.840 --> 0:16:54.720
<v Speaker 1>to adjust on the fly to what the Patriots are doing,

0:16:54.760 --> 0:16:57.080
<v Speaker 1>because they're going to dig deeper in their playbook and

0:16:57.120 --> 0:17:00.760
<v Speaker 1>find some things that haven't been used, and they're going

0:17:00.800 --> 0:17:02.960
<v Speaker 1>to try to surprise the opponent with it and see

0:17:02.960 --> 0:17:05.760
<v Speaker 1>how they react. From a chess match standpoint, that makes

0:17:05.760 --> 0:17:08.760
<v Speaker 1>this really interesting. It does. It's a very compelling matchup.

0:17:08.840 --> 0:17:12.040
<v Speaker 1>I still think, in my opinion, though, that the Patriots

0:17:12.080 --> 0:17:13.879
<v Speaker 1>are the team with the most amount of pressure on

0:17:13.960 --> 0:17:16.360
<v Speaker 1>them because, as the Eagles up said, I mean, they're

0:17:16.359 --> 0:17:18.200
<v Speaker 1>the underdogs. They're gonna ride that all the way through.

0:17:18.280 --> 0:17:20.880
<v Speaker 1>Even though they've been a number one seed in THEFC,

0:17:21.280 --> 0:17:23.880
<v Speaker 1>they've been an underdog every single week. The reason why

0:17:23.920 --> 0:17:26.240
<v Speaker 1>I see the pressures on the Patriots is because Nick

0:17:26.280 --> 0:17:29.040
<v Speaker 1>Foles in that Philadelphia offense that was not supposed to

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:31.879
<v Speaker 1>do anything against that number one ranked defense in the NFL.

0:17:32.119 --> 0:17:33.879
<v Speaker 1>They surprised a lot of people. They opened up a

0:17:33.920 --> 0:17:35.280
<v Speaker 1>lot of eyes, and as you were seeing in our

0:17:35.280 --> 0:17:38.480
<v Speaker 1>pre production meeting, Doug Peterson, Frank right that the game

0:17:38.520 --> 0:17:42.120
<v Speaker 1>plan that they put together for that contest remarkable. Now,

0:17:42.160 --> 0:17:45.200
<v Speaker 1>the question is can Doug Peterson, the lifelong backup, the

0:17:45.240 --> 0:17:47.800
<v Speaker 1>former high school football coach. Can they do it again

0:17:47.840 --> 0:17:50.040
<v Speaker 1>against one of the game's very best it, I think

0:17:50.080 --> 0:17:51.800
<v Speaker 1>to me, I'm going to be glued to the television

0:17:51.800 --> 0:17:53.880
<v Speaker 1>for all four hours however long that thing goes. Yeah,

0:17:53.920 --> 0:17:56.680
<v Speaker 1>And Doug Peterson, the former backup quarterback in Green Bay,

0:17:56.720 --> 0:17:58.840
<v Speaker 1>he's got Brett Farve coming to get us to the

0:17:58.880 --> 0:18:02.240
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia Eagles in their final team meeting on Saturday night.

0:18:02.640 --> 0:18:05.000
<v Speaker 1>You know, maybe those little inspirational things, you never know

0:18:05.040 --> 0:18:07.040
<v Speaker 1>how those can go. Yeah, and hopefully that that pre

0:18:07.440 --> 0:18:10.200
<v Speaker 1>whatever meeting actually wraps up at the time kickoff starts

0:18:10.200 --> 0:18:12.680
<v Speaker 1>on Sunday. Who knows how long far we'll talk. Right

0:18:13.040 --> 0:18:15.320
<v Speaker 1>with that, Let's take care of a little sponsored business.

0:18:15.359 --> 0:18:16.960
<v Speaker 1>Today is a perfect day to fill up with some

0:18:17.040 --> 0:18:20.399
<v Speaker 1>new Campbell's Chunky Max Soup. Chunky Max is loaded with

0:18:20.440 --> 0:18:22.240
<v Speaker 1>more meat than you can handle, a lot more. We're

0:18:22.280 --> 0:18:25.760
<v Speaker 1>talking more than a comparable Chunky soup. So go on

0:18:25.880 --> 0:18:29.640
<v Speaker 1>fill up with new Campbell's Chunky Max Soup. Campbell's Chunky Soup,

0:18:29.680 --> 0:18:31.960
<v Speaker 1>the official sup partner the Green Bay Packers back with

0:18:32.000 --> 0:18:51.960
<v Speaker 1>more on Packers Unscripted right after this welcome back to

0:18:52.040 --> 0:18:55.240
<v Speaker 1>Packers unscripted Mike Spofford. Here, West, Hodko, It's over there,

0:18:55.280 --> 0:18:58.800
<v Speaker 1>okay West? Quickly before we go Super Bowl fifty two

0:18:58.840 --> 0:19:01.800
<v Speaker 1>Patriots against the Eagles, I want to know who you

0:19:01.840 --> 0:19:04.720
<v Speaker 1>think an X factor in this game is going to be,

0:19:04.800 --> 0:19:06.640
<v Speaker 1>and then I want your prediction on what you think

0:19:06.680 --> 0:19:08.280
<v Speaker 1>is gonna happen. I think the X factor is gonna

0:19:08.280 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 1>be Rick Lovado, the former Packers long snapper that was

0:19:11.600 --> 0:19:14.359
<v Speaker 1>serving sandwiches two years ago and now the New Jersey

0:19:14.400 --> 0:19:16.560
<v Speaker 1>sub shop. Yeah, he's gonna be snapping in the super Bowl.

0:19:16.560 --> 0:19:18.800
<v Speaker 1>And no credit toil Rick. I really liked him during

0:19:18.800 --> 0:19:20.960
<v Speaker 1>his time. A good dude. I wish him well. But

0:19:21.680 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 1>to me, I think the biggest X factor honestly is

0:19:24.320 --> 0:19:27.280
<v Speaker 1>going to be Nick Foles. And if Foles can can

0:19:27.520 --> 0:19:30.439
<v Speaker 1>really I don't want to say chop up, but I

0:19:30.440 --> 0:19:33.800
<v Speaker 1>mean he just did everything so darn effectively against Minnesota.

0:19:33.800 --> 0:19:35.920
<v Speaker 1>There were no holes in his game. In that game

0:19:36.320 --> 0:19:38.080
<v Speaker 1>he put that he made the plays that were there

0:19:38.119 --> 0:19:41.040
<v Speaker 1>down field, and he was smart with the football. You

0:19:41.119 --> 0:19:43.320
<v Speaker 1>have to do that against the New England Patriots, I

0:19:43.359 --> 0:19:46.359
<v Speaker 1>think you saw the downfall. Even when Blake Bortles played

0:19:46.400 --> 0:19:49.920
<v Speaker 1>a perfect game for fifty five minutes. When it came

0:19:49.920 --> 0:19:52.760
<v Speaker 1>down to crunch time, the Patriots defense, they had the

0:19:52.880 --> 0:19:55.280
<v Speaker 1>right calls. Bortles wasn't able to make enough plays. That

0:19:55.359 --> 0:19:59.359
<v Speaker 1>was the difference. I think if if Foles is able

0:19:59.400 --> 0:20:03.400
<v Speaker 1>to protect the football, I think that the Philadelphia Eagles

0:20:03.400 --> 0:20:05.480
<v Speaker 1>are going to get their first Super Bowl victory because

0:20:06.160 --> 0:20:08.720
<v Speaker 1>I see even with as you mentioned, all the changes

0:20:08.800 --> 0:20:11.480
<v Speaker 1>that the Patriots are gonna make it, I'm fully with you,

0:20:11.480 --> 0:20:13.880
<v Speaker 1>they're gonna show a lot of unscarted luck. I still

0:20:13.920 --> 0:20:16.240
<v Speaker 1>think this is a They played the best defense in

0:20:16.240 --> 0:20:18.240
<v Speaker 1>the league last week, and if he did that to them,

0:20:18.760 --> 0:20:20.560
<v Speaker 1>if you could find a way to replicate that again

0:20:20.560 --> 0:20:22.280
<v Speaker 1>in these two weeks that they have to prepare for it,

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:24.600
<v Speaker 1>I think the Philadelphia Eagles call it on top. Yeah.

0:20:24.600 --> 0:20:26.760
<v Speaker 1>For me, the X factor is also with the Eagles,

0:20:26.760 --> 0:20:29.199
<v Speaker 1>and I'm going with running back j A Gi if

0:20:29.240 --> 0:20:31.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm saying correctly, because when you talk about protecting Nick

0:20:31.880 --> 0:20:35.000
<v Speaker 1>Foles protecting the football, I think I think A Gi

0:20:35.240 --> 0:20:37.840
<v Speaker 1>and this running game of the Eagles is what is

0:20:37.840 --> 0:20:39.840
<v Speaker 1>going to be Nick Fole's best friend and his and

0:20:39.880 --> 0:20:43.639
<v Speaker 1>his potential protection against Matt Patricia's blitz is and whatever

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:47.200
<v Speaker 1>that New England defensive coordinator is gonna throw Adam. As

0:20:47.200 --> 0:20:50.040
<v Speaker 1>far as a prediction, I'll say this, I think when

0:20:50.040 --> 0:20:52.840
<v Speaker 1>the Patriots are in the Super Bowl, it's extremely hard

0:20:52.880 --> 0:20:55.040
<v Speaker 1>to predict what's going to happen because if you look

0:20:55.080 --> 0:20:57.119
<v Speaker 1>at the if you look at Tom Brady's career in

0:20:57.160 --> 0:21:00.639
<v Speaker 1>the Super Bowl, He's lost two Super Bowls, the David

0:21:00.680 --> 0:21:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Tyree helmet catch and the Mario Manningham diving sideline bomb catch,

0:21:06.320 --> 0:21:10.080
<v Speaker 1>and he's won two Super Bowls. When the Seattle Seahawks

0:21:10.119 --> 0:21:11.880
<v Speaker 1>decided to throw the ball from the one yard line

0:21:11.880 --> 0:21:14.520
<v Speaker 1>instead of run up with Marshawn Lynch and then last

0:21:14.560 --> 0:21:18.280
<v Speaker 1>year coming back from to three and the Julian Adelman

0:21:18.400 --> 0:21:20.520
<v Speaker 1>bounce all over the place, you know, catch in the

0:21:20.560 --> 0:21:22.160
<v Speaker 1>middle of the field. That was such a huge part

0:21:22.160 --> 0:21:25.760
<v Speaker 1>of that comeback. So prediction wise, I tell you, you know,

0:21:26.280 --> 0:21:29.040
<v Speaker 1>anything can happen. The Super Bowls with the Patriots have

0:21:29.080 --> 0:21:30.879
<v Speaker 1>shown us that. But I'm with you. I think the

0:21:30.880 --> 0:21:32.520
<v Speaker 1>Eagles pull this thing out. Yeah, And I'd like to

0:21:32.560 --> 0:21:35.119
<v Speaker 1>see if their backfield, as you mentioned, can outduel the

0:21:35.160 --> 0:21:37.000
<v Speaker 1>backfield of the Patriots. I think there's a ten or

0:21:37.040 --> 0:21:39.760
<v Speaker 1>eleven running backs playing in this game. They both have

0:21:39.920 --> 0:21:43.200
<v Speaker 1>stacked really use a lot of different looks. If Jay

0:21:43.320 --> 0:21:45.760
<v Speaker 1>and you know, Corey Clement, all those guys can pull

0:21:45.800 --> 0:21:47.919
<v Speaker 1>it together, I think they're gonna come up with a victory.

0:21:48.000 --> 0:21:49.920
<v Speaker 1>All right. With that, we will call it a rap

0:21:50.200 --> 0:21:52.800
<v Speaker 1>on this edition of Packers Unscripted. Be sure to follow

0:21:52.800 --> 0:21:55.400
<v Speaker 1>all of our coverage of the team on Packers dot

0:21:55.400 --> 0:21:57.760
<v Speaker 1>com on Twitter. He's at west Hot, I'm at Mike

0:21:57.800 --> 0:22:01.760
<v Speaker 1>Spofford at Packers for the m account. Thanks for tuning in, everybody.

0:22:02.040 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 1>We'll see you next time. M hmm.