WEBVTT - 4/8/25: US Clothing Brand Sounds Alarm On Tariffs, Trump Pulls Chair For Bibi, Tucker Warns On Iran War, SCOTUS Greenlights Trump Deportations

0:00:00.080 --> 0:00:01.599
<v Speaker 1>Hey guys, Saga and Crystal here.

0:00:01.680 --> 0:00:05.240
<v Speaker 2>Independent media just played a truly massive role in this election,

0:00:05.360 --> 0:00:07.840
<v Speaker 2>and we are so excited about what that means for

0:00:07.880 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 2>the future of the show.

0:00:08.880 --> 0:00:10.760
<v Speaker 3>This is the only place where you can find honest

0:00:10.760 --> 0:00:13.280
<v Speaker 3>perspectives from the left and the right that simply does

0:00:13.320 --> 0:00:14.680
<v Speaker 3>not exist anywhere else.

0:00:14.760 --> 0:00:17.080
<v Speaker 2>So if that is something that's important to you, please

0:00:17.120 --> 0:00:19.599
<v Speaker 2>go to Breakingpoints dot com. Become a member today and

0:00:19.640 --> 0:00:22.920
<v Speaker 2>you'll access to our full shows, unedited, ad free, and

0:00:23.040 --> 0:00:25.600
<v Speaker 2>all put together for you every morning in your inbox.

0:00:25.680 --> 0:00:27.560
<v Speaker 3>We need your help to build the future of independent

0:00:27.560 --> 0:00:29.920
<v Speaker 3>news media and we hope to see you at Breakingpoints

0:00:29.960 --> 0:00:35.639
<v Speaker 3>dot com. Joining us now is Andrew Chanhe's the co

0:00:35.720 --> 0:00:38.600
<v Speaker 3>owner of three sixteen, a powerhouse fashion brand here in

0:00:38.640 --> 0:00:41.200
<v Speaker 3>the US of which I am a customer. And Andrew

0:00:41.200 --> 0:00:44.400
<v Speaker 3>recently did a video talking about the effects of tariffs

0:00:44.440 --> 0:00:47.400
<v Speaker 3>on smaller fashion brands like himself, and so we thought

0:00:47.479 --> 0:00:49.040
<v Speaker 3>that it would be great to actually have him on

0:00:49.080 --> 0:00:51.400
<v Speaker 3>the show and to discuss So the video you put

0:00:51.400 --> 0:00:54.240
<v Speaker 3>out is three ways that the new tariffs will affect

0:00:54.400 --> 0:00:56.720
<v Speaker 3>for fashion brands like yours, So why don't you just

0:00:56.720 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 3>break some of this down for the audience. Andrew and

0:00:59.040 --> 0:01:00.760
<v Speaker 3>tell us at some point do you actually run one

0:01:00.760 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 3>of these business clothing textiles, something that obviously there's been

0:01:04.120 --> 0:01:07.040
<v Speaker 3>a lot of outsourcing on will affect somebody like you.

0:01:08.120 --> 0:01:11.280
<v Speaker 4>Thank you for the opportunity to come on today, and yeah,

0:01:11.319 --> 0:01:13.399
<v Speaker 4>we're still trying to navigate all of this. There's a

0:01:13.400 --> 0:01:16.440
<v Speaker 4>lot of uncertainty in the air. But the number one

0:01:16.440 --> 0:01:19.319
<v Speaker 4>thing that we wanted to touch on was the increased

0:01:19.360 --> 0:01:22.880
<v Speaker 4>costs that we face. We bring in all of our

0:01:22.959 --> 0:01:25.440
<v Speaker 4>fabric for our denim, which were Denim Brand that's what

0:01:25.480 --> 0:01:29.200
<v Speaker 4>we make the most of from Japan, and the new

0:01:29.240 --> 0:01:32.360
<v Speaker 4>tariffs are we're looking at about a twenty four percent

0:01:32.760 --> 0:01:37.880
<v Speaker 4>additional cost on fabric that's coming in. I think something

0:01:37.880 --> 0:01:40.240
<v Speaker 4>that's difficult for customers to understand, and we saw this

0:01:40.280 --> 0:01:42.160
<v Speaker 4>in the comments section of the video that we posted,

0:01:42.319 --> 0:01:46.880
<v Speaker 4>is that a ten dollars increase in raw materials doesn't

0:01:46.920 --> 0:01:51.160
<v Speaker 4>just result in a ten dollars increase at retail. You know,

0:01:51.200 --> 0:01:53.280
<v Speaker 4>we're part of a value chain model, which means that

0:01:53.680 --> 0:01:56.760
<v Speaker 4>we buy the fabric, we contract a factory to produce

0:01:56.800 --> 0:01:59.080
<v Speaker 4>it for us in the US in San Francisco, so

0:01:59.160 --> 0:02:03.040
<v Speaker 4>we are made in America company, and then we wholesale

0:02:03.040 --> 0:02:07.360
<v Speaker 4>it to retail stores around the world. These wholesale accounts

0:02:07.440 --> 0:02:12.239
<v Speaker 4>are store owners. They have small boutiques in parts of America,

0:02:12.440 --> 0:02:16.320
<v Speaker 4>in Europe, in Japan and Asia, and then they need

0:02:16.360 --> 0:02:18.760
<v Speaker 4>to mark that garment up in order to sell it

0:02:18.760 --> 0:02:21.880
<v Speaker 4>to their customers. And so if our costs go up

0:02:21.880 --> 0:02:24.280
<v Speaker 4>by ten dollars, in order to preserve our margins, we

0:02:24.360 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 4>have to increase our wholesale cost, and then that wholesale

0:02:27.080 --> 0:02:30.519
<v Speaker 4>cost needs to also translate to a higher retail cost.

0:02:30.639 --> 0:02:34.000
<v Speaker 4>So that's why a ten dollars increase in just materials

0:02:34.520 --> 0:02:37.120
<v Speaker 4>could result in a forty to fifty dollars increase once

0:02:37.160 --> 0:02:41.200
<v Speaker 4>it hits market. And we've found a lot of customers

0:02:41.240 --> 0:02:42.440
<v Speaker 4>calling that like that's greedy.

0:02:42.919 --> 0:02:44.800
<v Speaker 5>Why can't you just increase.

0:02:44.400 --> 0:02:46.480
<v Speaker 4>It ten dollars at the at the very end and

0:02:46.720 --> 0:02:49.079
<v Speaker 4>call it a day. And the reality is that, like

0:02:49.120 --> 0:02:52.320
<v Speaker 4>everybody has a business to run, we all have employees

0:02:52.360 --> 0:02:55.160
<v Speaker 4>to pay, we have healthcare to cover, we have in

0:02:55.200 --> 0:02:58.680
<v Speaker 4>our case, we provide retirement accounts for our small team.

0:02:59.440 --> 0:03:02.239
<v Speaker 4>You can't do that if your margins continued to decrease.

0:03:03.080 --> 0:03:05.160
<v Speaker 4>So that's a really difficult thing. The customer is going

0:03:05.200 --> 0:03:07.480
<v Speaker 4>to face some sort of price increase, and it's going

0:03:07.560 --> 0:03:09.680
<v Speaker 4>to be a lot more than just the straight raw

0:03:09.720 --> 0:03:10.200
<v Speaker 4>materials that.

0:03:10.200 --> 0:03:12.919
<v Speaker 5>Are coming in. A second thing that I talked about

0:03:13.120 --> 0:03:14.359
<v Speaker 5>was uncertainty.

0:03:15.520 --> 0:03:18.800
<v Speaker 4>As a fashion brand, we don't just design things and

0:03:18.840 --> 0:03:23.000
<v Speaker 4>then release it to market. We have to design it,

0:03:23.040 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 4>We bring it to trade shows, we have people pre

0:03:25.600 --> 0:03:28.840
<v Speaker 4>ordered garments, and then we go to production on it

0:03:28.880 --> 0:03:32.560
<v Speaker 4>based off of whatever orders they place. That helps us

0:03:32.560 --> 0:03:34.440
<v Speaker 4>to be more efficient. We're not just guessing at what

0:03:34.480 --> 0:03:37.520
<v Speaker 4>to make in these cases. We have to quote a

0:03:37.560 --> 0:03:40.280
<v Speaker 4>price so that the retail stores can decide like is

0:03:40.320 --> 0:03:42.520
<v Speaker 4>this something that my customers can afford? Is this something

0:03:42.520 --> 0:03:46.280
<v Speaker 4>that I feel like I can present at a reasonable

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:50.160
<v Speaker 4>cost to them? Now, we already just went to Paris

0:03:50.160 --> 0:03:52.760
<v Speaker 4>in January to sell our fall Winter twenty five collection,

0:03:53.240 --> 0:03:55.280
<v Speaker 4>and we had to give them prices on it. This

0:03:55.360 --> 0:03:59.880
<v Speaker 4>is pre tariffs, and so we produce garments in the US,

0:04:00.040 --> 0:04:03.160
<v Speaker 4>we produce them in Peru, we produce them in India

0:04:04.000 --> 0:04:09.520
<v Speaker 4>and in Portugal. So Peru's the only one that's subject

0:04:09.600 --> 0:04:12.440
<v Speaker 4>right now to the flat ten percent. India has a

0:04:12.440 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 4>twenty six percent additional tariff, and the EU also is

0:04:16.720 --> 0:04:20.640
<v Speaker 4>facing additional tariffs. So now we stand to have to

0:04:20.680 --> 0:04:22.680
<v Speaker 4>pay more for that finished garment to land in the

0:04:22.800 --> 0:04:24.960
<v Speaker 4>US than what we had quoted the price on. And

0:04:24.960 --> 0:04:27.560
<v Speaker 4>that's really difficult for us because somebody is going to

0:04:27.600 --> 0:04:30.240
<v Speaker 4>have to take a margin, you know, a margin hit

0:04:30.279 --> 0:04:32.840
<v Speaker 4>on that. It could be us, the brand, We could

0:04:32.880 --> 0:04:34.760
<v Speaker 4>just eat it and then we end up not making

0:04:34.800 --> 0:04:35.760
<v Speaker 4>any money at wholesale.

0:04:37.040 --> 0:04:38.320
<v Speaker 5>It could be the retail store.

0:04:38.320 --> 0:04:40.200
<v Speaker 4>We might have to split the difference with them if

0:04:40.200 --> 0:04:41.719
<v Speaker 4>they don't want the cost to go up too much,

0:04:42.400 --> 0:04:44.200
<v Speaker 4>or we might all decide like, hey, there's no way

0:04:44.200 --> 0:04:46.400
<v Speaker 4>that we can function as businesses and we're going to

0:04:46.440 --> 0:04:47.280
<v Speaker 4>all have to.

0:04:47.160 --> 0:04:47.960
<v Speaker 5>Increase the cost.

0:04:49.200 --> 0:04:51.640
<v Speaker 4>That's going to cause some stores to bow out of

0:04:51.640 --> 0:04:54.839
<v Speaker 4>their their commitments. That means that we now have to

0:04:55.240 --> 0:04:57.560
<v Speaker 4>you know, hold extra stock and be more inefficient as

0:04:57.600 --> 0:04:59.160
<v Speaker 4>a company. That means we're going to have to discount

0:04:59.440 --> 0:05:02.440
<v Speaker 4>or offload somehow. We try to be very careful with

0:05:02.480 --> 0:05:04.840
<v Speaker 4>the quantities that we set. We try not to overproduce,

0:05:05.800 --> 0:05:09.479
<v Speaker 4>but that's just unavoidable. We've already had some Canadian customers

0:05:09.920 --> 0:05:13.440
<v Speaker 4>cancel orders this spring season because of the game of

0:05:13.520 --> 0:05:15.679
<v Speaker 4>Chicken that you know, we played with Canada and Mexico

0:05:15.839 --> 0:05:17.960
<v Speaker 4>just a month and a half ago with the five

0:05:17.960 --> 0:05:20.040
<v Speaker 4>percent tariffs, there was too much uncertainty. They were like,

0:05:20.080 --> 0:05:22.760
<v Speaker 4>hold our shipments, we can't take anything right now. Wow,

0:05:22.920 --> 0:05:25.360
<v Speaker 4>they had already placed orders for fall winter twenty five.

0:05:25.480 --> 0:05:28.800
<v Speaker 4>I'm almost certain that they will cancel orders. And then

0:05:28.839 --> 0:05:31.960
<v Speaker 4>the third one is just deterioration of overseas markets. What

0:05:32.120 --> 0:05:35.520
<v Speaker 4>happens when trade wars begin is that other nations or

0:05:35.520 --> 0:05:38.360
<v Speaker 4>other regions begin to try and find ways to cooperate

0:05:38.600 --> 0:05:41.240
<v Speaker 4>because they need to get their products from somewhere. So

0:05:41.320 --> 0:05:44.719
<v Speaker 4>in twenty nineteen there was a free trade agreement that

0:05:44.760 --> 0:05:47.640
<v Speaker 4>was established between the EU and Japan, and so all

0:05:47.680 --> 0:05:50.359
<v Speaker 4>of our EU accounts are now able to bring in

0:05:50.880 --> 0:05:54.719
<v Speaker 4>great denim and great clothing from Japan. This is the

0:05:54.720 --> 0:05:57.200
<v Speaker 4>same country that makes our fabric, so they're very good

0:05:57.200 --> 0:06:01.600
<v Speaker 4>at making this niche product that we do. And if

0:06:01.640 --> 0:06:04.360
<v Speaker 4>you're a retail store in Europe and you can buy

0:06:04.400 --> 0:06:08.039
<v Speaker 4>stuff from Japan with no tariffs, and then you have

0:06:08.080 --> 0:06:09.520
<v Speaker 4>to be faced with the decision of am I going

0:06:09.520 --> 0:06:11.600
<v Speaker 4>to buy from this American brand that's going to cost

0:06:11.680 --> 0:06:15.240
<v Speaker 4>me even more than it did before, You're probably going

0:06:15.279 --> 0:06:19.200
<v Speaker 4>to make your decisions Accordingly, business just goes in the path.

0:06:19.000 --> 0:06:20.599
<v Speaker 5>Of least resistance of course.

0:06:20.720 --> 0:06:23.839
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, we spent a decade trying to cultivate this market

0:06:23.839 --> 0:06:26.240
<v Speaker 4>in the EU and we're finding success and stores like

0:06:26.320 --> 0:06:28.680
<v Speaker 4>the brand, they like the product, it just becomes cost

0:06:28.760 --> 0:06:29.960
<v Speaker 4>prohibitive for them.

0:06:30.360 --> 0:06:32.360
<v Speaker 6>So, Andrew, let me ask you this.

0:06:33.279 --> 0:06:36.000
<v Speaker 2>So I think what the President has supporters and people say,

0:06:36.160 --> 0:06:38.400
<v Speaker 2>you know, this is good for the long term for

0:06:38.440 --> 0:06:41.400
<v Speaker 2>the country. What they would respond is, you know, it's

0:06:41.440 --> 0:06:44.159
<v Speaker 2>short term pain. Yes, we get it. We understand that

0:06:44.200 --> 0:06:46.040
<v Speaker 2>this is going to cause issues for you, and it's

0:06:46.040 --> 0:06:48.720
<v Speaker 2>going to cause potentially prices to go up for consumers,

0:06:49.240 --> 0:06:52.480
<v Speaker 2>but it's going to create an incentive structure for business

0:06:52.520 --> 0:06:56.080
<v Speaker 2>owners like yourself to bring the entire supply chain for

0:06:56.240 --> 0:06:59.880
<v Speaker 2>your product here internally to the US and will create

0:06:59.839 --> 0:07:02.799
<v Speaker 2>additional jobs in the US. So over the long term,

0:07:02.920 --> 0:07:04.920
<v Speaker 2>this is going to be a better direction.

0:07:05.240 --> 0:07:06.400
<v Speaker 6>What is your response to that?

0:07:06.560 --> 0:07:08.960
<v Speaker 2>And also, you know, just walk us through, like what

0:07:09.000 --> 0:07:12.360
<v Speaker 2>would it entail for that to actually occur for you?

0:07:13.920 --> 0:07:16.400
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean what I would respond to that is

0:07:16.400 --> 0:07:18.920
<v Speaker 4>that a lot of these small brands don't have five

0:07:19.000 --> 0:07:21.480
<v Speaker 4>years or ten years to be able to build up

0:07:21.920 --> 0:07:27.680
<v Speaker 4>infrastructure and to reshure these things that America doesn't do anymore,

0:07:28.200 --> 0:07:31.920
<v Speaker 4>and I'll just keep it super super focused on genes

0:07:31.920 --> 0:07:34.760
<v Speaker 4>because that is what most customers know us for, they

0:07:34.760 --> 0:07:37.480
<v Speaker 4>come to us for. And so a lot of people

0:07:37.480 --> 0:07:39.720
<v Speaker 4>who are not familiar with our brand, when they saw

0:07:39.760 --> 0:07:41.400
<v Speaker 4>this video go viral, they're like, why don't you just

0:07:41.480 --> 0:07:44.160
<v Speaker 4>make it in America? And to the extent that we're

0:07:44.200 --> 0:07:48.040
<v Speaker 4>able to, we do. We employ a factory in San

0:07:48.040 --> 0:07:50.720
<v Speaker 4>Francisco that used to make genes for Levi's before they

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:54.400
<v Speaker 4>offshore production. We entered there fifteen years ago as the

0:07:54.440 --> 0:07:57.160
<v Speaker 4>smallest brand there and now we are their biggest client

0:07:58.440 --> 0:08:02.080
<v Speaker 4>and they rely on us business. But the fabric that

0:08:02.080 --> 0:08:04.239
<v Speaker 4>we use, and I don't know if this is getting

0:08:04.280 --> 0:08:07.640
<v Speaker 4>too niche, but it is salvage denim. It is denim

0:08:07.680 --> 0:08:10.320
<v Speaker 4>that is woven the way that denham used to be

0:08:10.360 --> 0:08:13.640
<v Speaker 4>made in the forties to the sixties, when it was

0:08:13.840 --> 0:08:15.920
<v Speaker 4>more than just a work where fabric it was something

0:08:16.000 --> 0:08:20.640
<v Speaker 4>that people needed longevity out of. And it's a slow

0:08:21.440 --> 0:08:25.720
<v Speaker 4>and almost antiquated way of making denim that is largely

0:08:25.800 --> 0:08:28.240
<v Speaker 4>unavailable in the US. There are a few small mills

0:08:28.280 --> 0:08:31.120
<v Speaker 4>that still exist here, but the biggest one was Cone

0:08:31.160 --> 0:08:34.440
<v Speaker 4>Mills White Oak in North Carolina, and they closed in

0:08:34.480 --> 0:08:39.960
<v Speaker 4>twenty seventeen to lack of demand. Customers are not accustomed

0:08:40.000 --> 0:08:46.880
<v Speaker 4>to paying for clothing. Derek Guy die workwear on Twitter

0:08:46.920 --> 0:08:51.240
<v Speaker 4>and Blue Sky. He shared on one of his threads.

0:08:51.360 --> 0:08:53.800
<v Speaker 4>In the early nineteen sixties, US household spent twelve percent

0:08:53.840 --> 0:08:56.040
<v Speaker 4>of the income out apparel, and that would be four

0:08:56.440 --> 0:08:58.960
<v Speaker 4>one hundred and fifty seven dollars in today's dollars. In

0:08:59.000 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 4>twenty sixteen it was four percent, so eighteen hundred dollars.

0:09:03.960 --> 0:09:05.800
<v Speaker 4>But that's not because people are buying less clothes. They're

0:09:05.840 --> 0:09:09.640
<v Speaker 4>buying more clothes, they're buying cheap clothes. We're in niche brand,

0:09:09.679 --> 0:09:11.880
<v Speaker 4>we're small. We try and make clothes the way that

0:09:11.920 --> 0:09:16.679
<v Speaker 4>they used to be made. We pay attention to fabric, details, construction,

0:09:17.400 --> 0:09:19.840
<v Speaker 4>and the best denim in the world is being made

0:09:19.840 --> 0:09:23.560
<v Speaker 4>in Japan. It's not because they came and brought up

0:09:23.559 --> 0:09:24.400
<v Speaker 4>all of our old looms.

0:09:24.400 --> 0:09:25.040
<v Speaker 5>That's a rumor.

0:09:25.480 --> 0:09:28.120
<v Speaker 4>Japan has a long and storied history of textile development,

0:09:29.360 --> 0:09:33.360
<v Speaker 4>and they've invested into this industry, and there's also a

0:09:33.400 --> 0:09:37.800
<v Speaker 4>domestic appreciation for that craft and that level of authenticity

0:09:37.800 --> 0:09:40.800
<v Speaker 4>and fabric and it's just not achievable at that level.

0:09:40.840 --> 0:09:42.560
<v Speaker 4>And I know that may hurt for some people to hear,

0:09:43.000 --> 0:09:45.080
<v Speaker 4>but as a brand, it's our prerogative to make the

0:09:45.120 --> 0:09:48.640
<v Speaker 4>best possible product for our customers, and so it's not

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:51.880
<v Speaker 4>a matter of us being scared that this is going

0:09:51.920 --> 0:09:53.439
<v Speaker 4>to cost too much. We just want to maintain a

0:09:53.520 --> 0:09:57.400
<v Speaker 4>level of quality, and so there are no options for us.

0:09:58.200 --> 0:10:00.520
<v Speaker 4>For a little story, about six or seven years ago,

0:10:01.000 --> 0:10:02.719
<v Speaker 4>an email came in our inbox. It almost seemed like

0:10:02.760 --> 0:10:05.040
<v Speaker 4>a scam, but someone's like, do you want to buy

0:10:05.080 --> 0:10:07.240
<v Speaker 4>all these shuttle looms? Shuttle looms are the looms that

0:10:07.360 --> 0:10:10.360
<v Speaker 4>make this salvage dentim and we like, there's no way

0:10:10.360 --> 0:10:12.240
<v Speaker 4>this could be. It turned out that they were. They

0:10:12.240 --> 0:10:15.640
<v Speaker 4>were looms from the shuttered you know, Cone White White

0:10:15.640 --> 0:10:19.440
<v Speaker 4>Oak mills. In order for this whole story to work

0:10:19.920 --> 0:10:22.640
<v Speaker 4>for us to offshore, you're asking us as a brand

0:10:22.960 --> 0:10:28.640
<v Speaker 4>to come and buy looms, start a factory, start making fabric.

0:10:28.679 --> 0:10:30.600
<v Speaker 4>We have no expertise in this. We didn't go to

0:10:30.640 --> 0:10:33.640
<v Speaker 4>school for textile development. We do know how to manage

0:10:33.640 --> 0:10:37.080
<v Speaker 4>a factory. There would be so much inefficiency, we would

0:10:37.120 --> 0:10:39.640
<v Speaker 4>probably mess up a ton. We would probably shut We

0:10:39.679 --> 0:10:42.160
<v Speaker 4>definitely would have shut down. There's no way that there

0:10:42.240 --> 0:10:43.839
<v Speaker 4>was this would have been an option for us.

0:10:44.040 --> 0:10:46.920
<v Speaker 2>So basically, if you were to pursue this path of

0:10:47.120 --> 0:10:48.960
<v Speaker 2>I would just do it all in the US. You

0:10:48.960 --> 0:10:51.560
<v Speaker 2>would have a lower quality product and it would cost more.

0:10:52.200 --> 0:10:54.080
<v Speaker 4>It would cause it would yes, if we were not

0:10:54.120 --> 0:10:56.000
<v Speaker 4>going to go and own our own open our own mill,

0:10:56.679 --> 0:10:58.520
<v Speaker 4>it would not be the product would not be at

0:10:58.520 --> 0:10:59.600
<v Speaker 4>the level that we would want.

0:11:00.240 --> 0:11:02.600
<v Speaker 3>And that's I think that's very important for people to understand,

0:11:02.679 --> 0:11:05.120
<v Speaker 3>is that the administration is putting this all on you.

0:11:05.160 --> 0:11:07.640
<v Speaker 3>They're not offering you any tax break, They're not offering

0:11:07.679 --> 0:11:10.559
<v Speaker 3>you any relief for anything in the interim. And then

0:11:10.600 --> 0:11:12.760
<v Speaker 3>even on the cultural point, I think this is so important.

0:11:12.800 --> 0:11:13.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, as you.

0:11:13.320 --> 0:11:16.839
<v Speaker 3>Said about Japan, they have a literal decades long history

0:11:16.880 --> 0:11:20.480
<v Speaker 3>of appreciation for craft. They have a cost structure built

0:11:20.559 --> 0:11:25.840
<v Speaker 3>in to preserve that their tax incentives, economics incentives, cultural

0:11:25.840 --> 0:11:29.720
<v Speaker 3>incentives to build an entire ecosystem which actually does produce

0:11:29.760 --> 0:11:31.520
<v Speaker 3>something that many of the people who push this policy

0:11:31.520 --> 0:11:34.760
<v Speaker 3>extensibly want a return to quality away from fast fashion.

0:11:35.040 --> 0:11:38.000
<v Speaker 3>And so as somebody involved and again creating an extremely

0:11:38.240 --> 0:11:42.200
<v Speaker 3>high quality product, something that I literally purchase myself, what

0:11:42.400 --> 0:11:44.280
<v Speaker 3>are thus you know, what are the headwinds that you

0:11:44.320 --> 0:11:47.640
<v Speaker 3>are swimming against with the rise of fast fashion, which

0:11:47.679 --> 0:11:50.080
<v Speaker 3>ostensibly is something that they're trying to stop and boost

0:11:50.280 --> 0:11:54.080
<v Speaker 3>someone like you, Is this policy actually just going to perhaps,

0:11:54.200 --> 0:11:57.040
<v Speaker 3>like you know, increase the amount of fast fashion consumed,

0:11:57.559 --> 0:12:00.200
<v Speaker 3>cheaper goods that people will turn to in a time

0:12:00.520 --> 0:12:02.800
<v Speaker 3>of depression, Like have you seen a reduction perhaps in

0:12:02.840 --> 0:12:05.320
<v Speaker 3>demand like you said with Canada and Mexico. What is

0:12:05.360 --> 0:12:06.360
<v Speaker 3>the net effect of all of this?

0:12:07.400 --> 0:12:10.760
<v Speaker 4>Yeah, I mean the only way. So we already talked

0:12:10.760 --> 0:12:12.600
<v Speaker 4>about customers going to face they are going to face

0:12:12.640 --> 0:12:15.839
<v Speaker 4>increased costs. There's no way around it. I don't know

0:12:15.880 --> 0:12:17.439
<v Speaker 4>when that's going to happen. I don't know when it's

0:12:17.440 --> 0:12:20.120
<v Speaker 4>going to take effect. Even for us, I don't know

0:12:20.160 --> 0:12:22.120
<v Speaker 4>when our next shipment of fabric is going to get hit.

0:12:22.160 --> 0:12:24.160
<v Speaker 4>We have a huge shipment of denim that's supposed to

0:12:24.200 --> 0:12:26.199
<v Speaker 4>land in three to four days. I don't know if

0:12:26.200 --> 0:12:29.440
<v Speaker 4>that's subject to the new terraffs or the shipment after that. Like,

0:12:29.440 --> 0:12:31.000
<v Speaker 4>we're not going away, so we're going to have to

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:34.800
<v Speaker 4>take another shipment. But customers will face increase costs. For

0:12:34.840 --> 0:12:39.440
<v Speaker 4>the brands, it's going to be difficult because every brand

0:12:39.480 --> 0:12:43.360
<v Speaker 4>is going to have to decide whether they want to

0:12:43.400 --> 0:12:48.559
<v Speaker 4>increase costs or lower quality, or maybe some metric that

0:12:48.600 --> 0:12:51.440
<v Speaker 4>involves both of those two things. If they feel that

0:12:51.480 --> 0:12:54.720
<v Speaker 4>their customers cannot stomach and increase in costs, they're going

0:12:54.760 --> 0:12:56.640
<v Speaker 4>to have to reduce quality.

0:12:56.800 --> 0:12:58.959
<v Speaker 5>They're going to have to cut corners in terms of the.

0:12:58.880 --> 0:13:00.800
<v Speaker 4>Fabrics they use, that construction, they may have to move

0:13:00.800 --> 0:13:03.640
<v Speaker 4>to a different facility, any number of things. So there

0:13:03.679 --> 0:13:07.040
<v Speaker 4>is a cost all the way around. And we've already

0:13:07.120 --> 0:13:10.280
<v Speaker 4>established that. You know, it's not that people are buying

0:13:10.360 --> 0:13:13.480
<v Speaker 4>less clothes, they're just spending less on them, and so

0:13:13.559 --> 0:13:14.840
<v Speaker 4>I don't really see that changing.

0:13:15.040 --> 0:13:20.240
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, last question for you. Your video went viral. You know,

0:13:20.320 --> 0:13:22.800
<v Speaker 2>people who are trying to understand what this means for

0:13:22.880 --> 0:13:25.640
<v Speaker 2>individual business owners. I think really got a lot out

0:13:25.720 --> 0:13:27.400
<v Speaker 2>of it. I certainly got a lot out of it

0:13:27.480 --> 0:13:31.520
<v Speaker 2>watching it. Are you nervous at all about its virality?

0:13:31.960 --> 0:13:35.400
<v Speaker 2>Given you know this president can be very punitive if

0:13:35.440 --> 0:13:37.640
<v Speaker 2>someone is speaking on against him. You know, you see

0:13:37.640 --> 0:13:40.760
<v Speaker 2>the way that a lot of business leaders have made

0:13:40.800 --> 0:13:43.120
<v Speaker 2>efforts to getting close with him so that they don't

0:13:43.160 --> 0:13:47.080
<v Speaker 2>face retaliation. Is that something that concerns you all at all?

0:13:47.200 --> 0:13:49.440
<v Speaker 2>In just speaking out on the basics of how this

0:13:49.480 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 2>will impact your business and your future.

0:13:52.040 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 5>I mean, I'm talking to the t also.

0:13:55.000 --> 0:13:56.080
<v Speaker 6>Not too nervous anyway.

0:13:56.720 --> 0:13:59.199
<v Speaker 5>No, it's been surprising.

0:13:59.240 --> 0:14:00.840
<v Speaker 4>I think when we meet the video, we just tried

0:14:00.840 --> 0:14:03.040
<v Speaker 4>to speak from the heart, and we also tried to

0:14:03.080 --> 0:14:05.400
<v Speaker 4>speak in a non partisan ways, just like, hey, this

0:14:05.480 --> 0:14:08.479
<v Speaker 4>is what's happening to us, this is our perspective.

0:14:08.520 --> 0:14:11.760
<v Speaker 5>There was no political leaning.

0:14:11.880 --> 0:14:14.240
<v Speaker 4>I don't think in the things that we shared was

0:14:14.280 --> 0:14:16.760
<v Speaker 4>just the reality of like the types of decisions that

0:14:16.800 --> 0:14:19.320
<v Speaker 4>we're going to need to make in the coming weeks

0:14:19.320 --> 0:14:23.520
<v Speaker 4>and months. We're a pretty small fish. I hope that,

0:14:23.800 --> 0:14:27.240
<v Speaker 4>you know, we're not really attracting that kind of attention,

0:14:27.400 --> 0:14:29.840
<v Speaker 4>but you know, I do think that people want to

0:14:29.880 --> 0:14:31.760
<v Speaker 4>hear from small businesses.

0:14:31.320 --> 0:14:33.360
<v Speaker 6>Like ours, definitely that are you.

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:36.360
<v Speaker 4>Know, we're actually really trying to like making stuff in

0:14:36.400 --> 0:14:39.600
<v Speaker 4>America is has been central to what we do. When

0:14:39.600 --> 0:14:41.920
<v Speaker 4>we started making jeens in two thousand and eight, our

0:14:41.960 --> 0:14:45.800
<v Speaker 4>first samples came from China and they didn't come in

0:14:46.440 --> 0:14:48.800
<v Speaker 4>construction wise at the level that we wanted. So we

0:14:48.840 --> 0:14:52.320
<v Speaker 4>went we found historic factory that had been making geens

0:14:52.320 --> 0:14:56.160
<v Speaker 4>in America for decades and decades and they're staffed by

0:14:56.360 --> 0:14:58.080
<v Speaker 4>I don't know if I'm opening another can of worms here,

0:14:58.080 --> 0:15:01.000
<v Speaker 4>but they're staffed by immigrants. The people that make your

0:15:01.040 --> 0:15:03.920
<v Speaker 4>clothes don't in America, don't always look the way that

0:15:03.960 --> 0:15:08.160
<v Speaker 4>you think that they do. They're all legal citizens, but

0:15:08.200 --> 0:15:10.680
<v Speaker 4>they all came to America with a skill set that

0:15:10.720 --> 0:15:13.480
<v Speaker 4>America does not cultivate in a meaningful way either anymore. Right,

0:15:13.560 --> 0:15:16.560
<v Speaker 4>I mean, like I want to, I had homec class

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:18.560
<v Speaker 4>in middle school. Maybe that dates how old I am,

0:15:19.120 --> 0:15:21.200
<v Speaker 4>but I don't think that that really exists anymore. People

0:15:21.240 --> 0:15:22.600
<v Speaker 4>don't even know how to put a button on their

0:15:22.600 --> 0:15:23.160
<v Speaker 4>shirt anymore.

0:15:23.240 --> 0:15:23.440
<v Speaker 7>Yeah.

0:15:24.840 --> 0:15:29.040
<v Speaker 4>To expect this to come back, and to expect American

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 4>citizens to want to embrace these jobs. If there hasn't

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:37.080
<v Speaker 4>been a high value placed on craft and manufacturing, it's

0:15:37.080 --> 0:15:37.680
<v Speaker 4>going to be tough.

0:15:37.880 --> 0:15:38.360
<v Speaker 6>Yeah.

0:15:38.400 --> 0:15:43.920
<v Speaker 2>Well, I think Soccer's point and your point that in theory,

0:15:44.000 --> 0:15:47.080
<v Speaker 2>this policy is meant to support people like you. You know,

0:15:47.160 --> 0:15:49.760
<v Speaker 2>it's meant to push people more towards Okay, spend a

0:15:49.760 --> 0:15:52.040
<v Speaker 2>little bit more, but it'll be higher quality and it'll

0:15:52.080 --> 0:15:54.200
<v Speaker 2>be you know, from companies that put an emphasis on

0:15:54.240 --> 0:15:57.200
<v Speaker 2>making things here. And so the fact that even for

0:15:57.360 --> 0:15:59.880
<v Speaker 2>someone such as yourself and your business. You see this

0:16:00.080 --> 0:16:02.920
<v Speaker 2>as a major challenge to have to overcome. I think

0:16:02.960 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 2>is very illuminating about the practical realities of the policy.

0:16:06.480 --> 0:16:06.720
<v Speaker 6>Andrew.

0:16:06.760 --> 0:16:08.520
<v Speaker 2>We can't thank you enough for taking the time out

0:16:08.720 --> 0:16:10.680
<v Speaker 2>to talk to us and explain your perspective on all

0:16:10.720 --> 0:16:10.880
<v Speaker 2>of this.

0:16:11.080 --> 0:16:13.440
<v Speaker 3>Thank you, Andrew. Thank you for making the clothes that

0:16:13.440 --> 0:16:15.240
<v Speaker 3>you guys do. As I said, I'm a loyal customer.

0:16:15.280 --> 0:16:17.680
<v Speaker 3>I'll continue to be and I encourage everybody out there

0:16:17.680 --> 0:16:19.240
<v Speaker 3>if you can, we'll put a link down on the scription.

0:16:19.240 --> 0:16:20.160
<v Speaker 1>You should go check them out.

0:16:20.800 --> 0:16:22.280
<v Speaker 5>Thank you for the time and the opportunity.

0:16:22.320 --> 0:16:23.320
<v Speaker 6>See it's our pleasure.

0:16:26.000 --> 0:16:28.560
<v Speaker 2>All right, let's go ahead and get to bib Netanyah,

0:16:28.600 --> 0:16:31.280
<v Speaker 2>who's meeting with Trump at the White House. We can

0:16:31.320 --> 0:16:33.400
<v Speaker 2>go ahead and put this up on the screen. Yes,

0:16:33.520 --> 0:16:36.720
<v Speaker 2>ladies and gentlemen, he did once again push in the

0:16:36.760 --> 0:16:40.680
<v Speaker 2>seat for his dear friend, the ICC indicted war criminal

0:16:41.000 --> 0:16:45.320
<v Speaker 2>bb Netanyaho. It's especially galling because this comes on a

0:16:45.400 --> 0:16:49.840
<v Speaker 2>day when we found out that the Israelis have murdered

0:16:49.880 --> 0:16:54.240
<v Speaker 2>another American. This was a Palston American child who was

0:16:54.400 --> 0:16:58.120
<v Speaker 2>shot dead. Two others were shot and wounded by Israeli forces.

0:16:58.120 --> 0:17:01.800
<v Speaker 2>In the occupied West Bank reporting from Ryan our friends

0:17:01.800 --> 0:17:04.240
<v Speaker 2>over at drop Site News. By the way, make sure

0:17:04.240 --> 0:17:06.600
<v Speaker 2>and help them out because they appear to be getting

0:17:06.720 --> 0:17:10.120
<v Speaker 2>significantly suppressed and buried over on Twitter. If you try

0:17:10.119 --> 0:17:12.439
<v Speaker 2>to search for them, they don't come up, So make

0:17:12.480 --> 0:17:15.240
<v Speaker 2>sure you're supporting Ryan and drop Site and Jeremy over there.

0:17:15.760 --> 0:17:17.159
<v Speaker 2>In any case, let me go ahead and read their

0:17:17.200 --> 0:17:18.440
<v Speaker 2>report and keep this up on the screen.

0:17:18.560 --> 0:17:19.120
<v Speaker 6>Eric, they say.

0:17:19.240 --> 0:17:23.280
<v Speaker 2>Omar Mohammad Ravella, a fourteen year old Palestinian with US citizenship,

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:25.520
<v Speaker 2>was shot and killed on Sunday by Israeli forces near

0:17:25.520 --> 0:17:29.080
<v Speaker 2>the West Bank town of turmas Aya. I'm sorry, guys,

0:17:29.119 --> 0:17:32.959
<v Speaker 2>northeast of Ramala. Two other Palestinian American boys, age fourteen

0:17:33.000 --> 0:17:35.240
<v Speaker 2>and fifteen also shot and wounded, one in the abdomen,

0:17:35.320 --> 0:17:37.520
<v Speaker 2>the other in the thigh. Both were taken to a

0:17:37.600 --> 0:17:40.960
<v Speaker 2>nearby clinic. There's no dispute from the Israelis that they

0:17:41.040 --> 0:17:44.680
<v Speaker 2>were responsible for this killing. They say that this American

0:17:44.720 --> 0:17:48.840
<v Speaker 2>citizen was throwing rocks towards a highway, so that was

0:17:48.880 --> 0:17:53.480
<v Speaker 2>the reason for his killing. The President making, i guess,

0:17:53.480 --> 0:17:57.840
<v Speaker 2>not exactly making news, but reiterating his commitment to the

0:17:58.040 --> 0:18:02.720
<v Speaker 2>US having a peacekeeping force in a Gaza Strip that

0:18:02.760 --> 0:18:05.240
<v Speaker 2>has been ethnically cleansed of all Palestinians.

0:18:05.320 --> 0:18:07.000
<v Speaker 6>Let's go ahead and take a listen to what he

0:18:07.040 --> 0:18:07.560
<v Speaker 6>had to say.

0:18:07.960 --> 0:18:09.959
<v Speaker 8>Well, you know how I feel about the Gaza Strip.

0:18:10.000 --> 0:18:14.440
<v Speaker 8>I think it's an incredible piece of important real estate,

0:18:15.160 --> 0:18:18.800
<v Speaker 8>and I think it's something that we would be involved in.

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:22.119
<v Speaker 8>But you know, having a peace force like the United

0:18:22.119 --> 0:18:25.359
<v Speaker 8>States there controlling and owning the Gaza Strip would be

0:18:25.400 --> 0:18:28.119
<v Speaker 8>a good thing because right now all it is is

0:18:28.119 --> 0:18:30.879
<v Speaker 8>for years and years, all I hear about is killing

0:18:30.960 --> 0:18:34.520
<v Speaker 8>and Hamas and problems. And if you take the people,

0:18:34.880 --> 0:18:37.800
<v Speaker 8>the Palestinians and move them around to different countries, and

0:18:37.840 --> 0:18:41.199
<v Speaker 8>you have plenty of countries that will do that, and

0:18:41.720 --> 0:18:44.560
<v Speaker 8>you really have a freedom, a freedom zone. You call

0:18:44.600 --> 0:18:47.800
<v Speaker 8>it the freedom zone, A free zone, a zone where

0:18:47.800 --> 0:18:49.639
<v Speaker 8>people aren't going to be killed every day. That's a

0:18:49.760 --> 0:18:52.439
<v Speaker 8>hell of a place. It's a you know what, I

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:55.440
<v Speaker 8>call it, a great location that nobody wants to live

0:18:55.480 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 8>in because they really don't. And when they had good living,

0:18:58.760 --> 0:19:02.280
<v Speaker 8>when they have good living living, where Hamas and all

0:19:02.320 --> 0:19:06.240
<v Speaker 8>of the problems, the level of death on the Gaza

0:19:06.280 --> 0:19:11.359
<v Speaker 8>Strip is just incredible. And I've said it, I don't understand.

0:19:11.400 --> 0:19:14.080
<v Speaker 8>Why is your LEVI gave it up? Is you loaned it?

0:19:14.080 --> 0:19:16.240
<v Speaker 8>It wasn't this man so I can say it. He

0:19:16.280 --> 0:19:18.439
<v Speaker 8>wouldn't have given it up. I know him very well.

0:19:18.600 --> 0:19:22.240
<v Speaker 8>There's no way they took ocean front property and they

0:19:22.280 --> 0:19:23.639
<v Speaker 8>gave it to people for peace.

0:19:24.119 --> 0:19:25.080
<v Speaker 5>How did that work out?

0:19:25.359 --> 0:19:25.800
<v Speaker 8>Not good?

0:19:26.520 --> 0:19:31.280
<v Speaker 2>Just insane, just insane. It's ocean front property. Oh, incredible killing.

0:19:31.280 --> 0:19:32.879
<v Speaker 2>There the guy who's doing the killing and sitting right

0:19:32.960 --> 0:19:36.240
<v Speaker 2>next to you. But in case Sager, he is apparently

0:19:36.280 --> 0:19:37.479
<v Speaker 2>not joking about this.

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:40.359
<v Speaker 3>About this plan, freedom zone is like a two thousand

0:19:40.359 --> 0:19:44.000
<v Speaker 3>and five like fever dream of Paul Wolfewad. Not even

0:19:44.080 --> 0:19:47.160
<v Speaker 3>they would have the audacity Paul wolfo WIT's and Douglas

0:19:47.160 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 3>truth to suggest the United States should take occupation of

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:54.000
<v Speaker 3>the Gaza Strip. Their mere idiocy idea was let them

0:19:54.000 --> 0:19:56.879
<v Speaker 3>have elections and then we won't, you know, basically acknowledge

0:19:56.880 --> 0:20:00.439
<v Speaker 3>the result of set elections and effectively allow occupation from

0:20:00.520 --> 0:20:01.280
<v Speaker 3>that point forward.

0:20:01.280 --> 0:20:01.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know not.

0:20:01.880 --> 0:20:04.880
<v Speaker 3>I can't even express the rage which is necessary for

0:20:04.960 --> 0:20:08.240
<v Speaker 3>this idea. It just shows you that if you're my age,

0:20:08.440 --> 0:20:11.000
<v Speaker 3>everything just comes around. You get to live to see

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:14.119
<v Speaker 3>twice too great recessions and US troops in the Middle

0:20:14.160 --> 0:20:17.280
<v Speaker 3>East as a part of it. Literally tax dollars and

0:20:17.400 --> 0:20:22.200
<v Speaker 3>global treasure going to fund foreign wars which are basically inconsequential.

0:20:22.560 --> 0:20:24.879
<v Speaker 3>We just did a whole thing about trade and about China.

0:20:25.200 --> 0:20:28.720
<v Speaker 3>US bilateral trade with Israel is like fifty billion. It's

0:20:28.840 --> 0:20:32.840
<v Speaker 3>like a pimple on top of China. Yet with this

0:20:33.040 --> 0:20:36.800
<v Speaker 3>entire domination of our politics occupation there as if we

0:20:36.840 --> 0:20:38.240
<v Speaker 3>have any strategic.

0:20:38.080 --> 0:20:40.359
<v Speaker 1>Interest, the whole thing is preposterous.

0:20:40.440 --> 0:20:44.120
<v Speaker 3>It's not to mention the humanitarian disaster that we would

0:20:44.119 --> 0:20:48.240
<v Speaker 3>eventually be responsible for. The only bull case for this

0:20:48.480 --> 0:20:50.960
<v Speaker 3>is that he's bullshitting and then it won't happen. That's

0:20:51.000 --> 0:20:52.560
<v Speaker 3>not really a good case to be made in the

0:20:52.600 --> 0:20:55.360
<v Speaker 3>middle of a massive trade conflagration.

0:20:55.480 --> 0:20:56.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that we are right now.

0:20:56.400 --> 0:20:58.480
<v Speaker 3>So yeah, I'm going to take him seriously. I think

0:20:58.480 --> 0:21:01.240
<v Speaker 3>he definitely wants to do this and at an American

0:21:01.280 --> 0:21:05.080
<v Speaker 3>boot on the ground in Gaza, occupying this area is

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:09.639
<v Speaker 3>asking for a global ignition of terrorism, of attacks on

0:21:09.680 --> 0:21:15.119
<v Speaker 3>our troops, and of further conflagration intervention in the region.

0:21:15.320 --> 0:21:19.000
<v Speaker 2>Like anyway, Yeah, well, and I think if there's one

0:21:19.000 --> 0:21:20.840
<v Speaker 2>thing we've learned about Trump two point zero. It's that

0:21:20.880 --> 0:21:23.080
<v Speaker 2>you should take him both seriously and literally.

0:21:23.280 --> 0:21:25.360
<v Speaker 6>Yeah, like the idea.

0:21:25.440 --> 0:21:28.280
<v Speaker 2>Oh, he says things, but he doesn't relate. No, he's

0:21:28.359 --> 0:21:30.680
<v Speaker 2>doing the things. So the fact that he's said this

0:21:31.359 --> 0:21:34.080
<v Speaker 2>multiple times, he's never backed away from it. He's been

0:21:34.160 --> 0:21:36.480
<v Speaker 2>very consistent. I think you have to take it seriously.

0:21:36.640 --> 0:21:39.879
<v Speaker 2>And also in the context of baby grabbing onto him, this.

0:21:39.760 --> 0:21:40.160
<v Speaker 6>Is the greater.

0:21:40.320 --> 0:21:42.520
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, you've opened up he said something like, you've opened

0:21:42.560 --> 0:21:46.040
<v Speaker 2>up possibilities that never existed before. They've been actively reaching

0:21:46.040 --> 0:21:49.240
<v Speaker 2>out to countries be like, hey, will you take Palestinians.

0:21:49.600 --> 0:21:54.520
<v Speaker 2>So the plans are being put into place, and you know,

0:21:54.680 --> 0:21:58.879
<v Speaker 2>at the same time, the genocidal cartage continues in the

0:21:58.960 --> 0:22:04.600
<v Speaker 2>Gaza strip with our weaponry and our bombs and our blessing.

0:22:05.119 --> 0:22:10.520
<v Speaker 2>And the latest horror is these fifteen paramedics who were

0:22:10.680 --> 0:22:12.560
<v Speaker 2>shot and killed and some of them appeared to have

0:22:12.600 --> 0:22:16.560
<v Speaker 2>been shot execution style, and then they were buried and

0:22:16.600 --> 0:22:19.560
<v Speaker 2>the ambulances were buried by the IDF to try to

0:22:19.640 --> 0:22:24.119
<v Speaker 2>cover up their blatant war crimes. They lied to the

0:22:25.040 --> 0:22:27.919
<v Speaker 2>press and the international press and said that oh no, no,

0:22:27.960 --> 0:22:30.600
<v Speaker 2>they were approaching us suspiciously and they didn't have their

0:22:30.680 --> 0:22:34.480
<v Speaker 2>lights on, and that's why we responded in this particular way. Well,

0:22:34.920 --> 0:22:39.280
<v Speaker 2>they did not retrieve the phones of the paramedics who

0:22:39.280 --> 0:22:41.639
<v Speaker 2>they had slaughtered, and one of them was recording a

0:22:41.720 --> 0:22:46.240
<v Speaker 2>video of everything that happened. That directly robuts the IDFs

0:22:46.560 --> 0:22:50.840
<v Speaker 2>lies and Trey yinst Over on Fox News, who, to

0:22:50.880 --> 0:22:53.800
<v Speaker 2>his credit, I think, has covered this onslaught in Gaza

0:22:53.920 --> 0:22:57.160
<v Speaker 2>with a lot of integrity, including standing up for Palestinian journalists,

0:22:57.160 --> 0:23:00.000
<v Speaker 2>something that almost none of the American press corp outside

0:23:00.200 --> 0:23:03.600
<v Speaker 2>of him has actually done. He did an excellent report

0:23:03.880 --> 0:23:06.440
<v Speaker 2>on catching the IDF in these blatant Wise, let's go

0:23:06.480 --> 0:23:07.280
<v Speaker 2>ahead and take a listen.

0:23:07.720 --> 0:23:11.200
<v Speaker 9>Paramedics from the Palestine Red Crescent dig through the earth

0:23:11.240 --> 0:23:14.960
<v Speaker 9>of southern Gaza. They're recovering the bodies of their colleagues

0:23:15.240 --> 0:23:19.360
<v Speaker 9>killed by Israeli forces. On March twenty third, first responders

0:23:19.600 --> 0:23:22.879
<v Speaker 9>were dispatched to this area of Rufa. When they arrived,

0:23:23.040 --> 0:23:24.879
<v Speaker 9>Israeli soldiers opened fire.

0:23:30.280 --> 0:23:32.680
<v Speaker 10>Health workers should never be a target, and yet we're

0:23:32.720 --> 0:23:35.720
<v Speaker 10>here today digging up a mass grave of first responders

0:23:35.720 --> 0:23:36.480
<v Speaker 10>in paramedics.

0:23:36.760 --> 0:23:39.639
<v Speaker 9>On March thirty first, the IDF provided a statement to

0:23:39.680 --> 0:23:44.840
<v Speaker 9>Fox News saying quote several vehicles were identified advancing suspiciously

0:23:44.920 --> 0:23:50.000
<v Speaker 9>toward IDF troops without headlights or emergency signals. Video released

0:23:50.080 --> 0:23:53.960
<v Speaker 9>five days later by the Palestine Red Crescint directly contradicts

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 9>that statement. The IDEF also claimed in the initial findings

0:23:57.760 --> 0:24:01.280
<v Speaker 9>that nine out of the fifteen medics operatives in Hamas

0:24:01.320 --> 0:24:05.200
<v Speaker 9>and Islamic jihad. Asked multiple times for evidence to support

0:24:05.240 --> 0:24:08.800
<v Speaker 9>that claim, none was provided. Funerals were held late last

0:24:08.840 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 9>week for those killed by Israeli bullets. Families mourning the dead,

0:24:12.960 --> 0:24:17.560
<v Speaker 9>mothers trying to make sense of the senseless. He went

0:24:17.560 --> 0:24:20.119
<v Speaker 9>to save the martyrs and injured, and we've been waiting

0:24:20.160 --> 0:24:22.199
<v Speaker 9>for him for a week. We were told that he

0:24:22.320 --> 0:24:25.199
<v Speaker 9>was either martyred or injured. But I realized that they

0:24:25.240 --> 0:24:28.080
<v Speaker 9>had killed them from the very first moment. They had

0:24:28.160 --> 0:24:31.480
<v Speaker 9>killed them and buried them underground. As bodies of these

0:24:31.520 --> 0:24:35.280
<v Speaker 9>medics rest inside white plastic bags with a photo attached,

0:24:35.560 --> 0:24:38.920
<v Speaker 9>the face of refat Radwan stands out the man who

0:24:38.960 --> 0:24:44.240
<v Speaker 9>recorded his final moments with a final message forgive me mother.

0:24:44.800 --> 0:24:47.960
<v Speaker 9>This is the path I chose to help that, he said,

0:24:48.520 --> 0:24:49.760
<v Speaker 9>Sam Pinium.

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:53.600
<v Speaker 2>And Sager we were talking about is about this like

0:24:53.720 --> 0:24:56.200
<v Speaker 2>if you are a journalist who's interacting with the IDF.

0:24:56.280 --> 0:24:59.080
<v Speaker 2>At this point, how do you ever believe a word?

0:24:59.240 --> 0:25:01.400
<v Speaker 2>And I'm not even just talking about this incident. How

0:25:01.400 --> 0:25:06.000
<v Speaker 2>many times have they just lied flat out two journalists,

0:25:06.040 --> 0:25:09.120
<v Speaker 2>face to our face. It just they'll just make up anything,

0:25:09.720 --> 0:25:15.120
<v Speaker 2>and only when confronted with indisputable evidence that their narrative

0:25:15.280 --> 0:25:19.920
<v Speaker 2>was complete and total bullshit, then they'll do some you know, bullshit.

0:25:20.000 --> 0:25:22.320
<v Speaker 2>Oh well, we're going to conduct an investigation. We're going

0:25:22.359 --> 0:25:24.920
<v Speaker 2>to figure out Okay, sure, yeah, we've heard that one before.

0:25:25.000 --> 0:25:26.400
<v Speaker 1>No, I mean, it's genuinely sure.

0:25:26.440 --> 0:25:28.000
<v Speaker 3>I mean, the thing is is that we just have

0:25:28.040 --> 0:25:30.119
<v Speaker 3>to sit here and acknowledge the bravery of trade to

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:32.200
<v Speaker 3>even put that on the air over at Fox News.

0:25:32.240 --> 0:25:36.920
<v Speaker 3>You know, I have rarely seen anything like that in

0:25:37.040 --> 0:25:39.600
<v Speaker 3>the Western press. I guess the problem is is it

0:25:39.640 --> 0:25:44.160
<v Speaker 3>becomes it's only whenever it's genuinely something is completely undeniable,

0:25:44.640 --> 0:25:46.639
<v Speaker 3>is it able to make it to air? But then

0:25:46.680 --> 0:25:50.040
<v Speaker 3>all these other bullshit claims, oh they had rifles or there.

0:25:50.280 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 3>That was all also pushed by every MSNBC, you know,

0:25:54.280 --> 0:25:56.920
<v Speaker 3>all these New York Times, I mean, the New York Times.

0:25:56.920 --> 0:25:59.639
<v Speaker 3>Scandal of it is insane I remember Ryan alerting me

0:25:59.720 --> 0:26:02.040
<v Speaker 3>to that, just being like they literally just took the

0:26:02.119 --> 0:26:04.240
<v Speaker 3>Israelis word for it and then buried it in the

0:26:04.240 --> 0:26:05.240
<v Speaker 3>bottom of a paragraph.

0:26:05.359 --> 0:26:05.439
<v Speaker 10>Right.

0:26:05.520 --> 0:26:08.080
<v Speaker 3>They didn't call anyone at the Palestinian or were sorry

0:26:08.119 --> 0:26:10.760
<v Speaker 3>the Red Crescent, and we're like, what's going on here?

0:26:11.000 --> 0:26:13.560
<v Speaker 3>You know what, like what actually happened? They did no

0:26:13.960 --> 0:26:16.280
<v Speaker 3>reporting on the subject, and this is an organization which

0:26:16.320 --> 0:26:19.800
<v Speaker 3>won a Pulitzer Prize for their Gaza reporting.

0:26:20.520 --> 0:26:20.920
<v Speaker 5>That's right.

0:26:20.920 --> 0:26:23.400
<v Speaker 3>I mean, it's just nuts, But I don't know, it's

0:26:23.400 --> 0:26:26.720
<v Speaker 3>I think it's horrifying. The Freedom Zone, the continued, uh,

0:26:26.920 --> 0:26:29.920
<v Speaker 3>you know, the continuation of the war. They did say

0:26:30.000 --> 0:26:33.560
<v Speaker 3>some words about a ceasefire, but you know, nobody's particularly

0:26:33.600 --> 0:26:34.520
<v Speaker 3>optimistic right now.

0:26:34.800 --> 0:26:36.800
<v Speaker 2>Well, I guess the one thing he didn't give BB

0:26:36.960 --> 0:26:40.120
<v Speaker 2>is I think BB wanted the tariff's taken off of him.

0:26:40.640 --> 0:26:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, that's rank.

0:26:41.640 --> 0:26:44.399
<v Speaker 3>He didn't get that Trump is Trump is current. What's

0:26:44.440 --> 0:26:47.560
<v Speaker 3>the joke is like Trump is currently employing bds. Yes,

0:26:47.680 --> 0:26:49.399
<v Speaker 3>Trump is currently BDS in Israel.

0:26:49.920 --> 0:26:50.080
<v Speaker 8>More.

0:26:50.240 --> 0:26:52.399
<v Speaker 3>I mean, let's also just linger there on the propos

0:26:52.480 --> 0:26:55.359
<v Speaker 3>and this is where you know, uh, you have a

0:26:55.359 --> 0:26:58.199
<v Speaker 3>country which would not exist save for the United States,

0:26:58.359 --> 0:27:02.320
<v Speaker 3>which provides it some three billion per year, which basically

0:27:02.400 --> 0:27:06.920
<v Speaker 3>backstops their entire economy and extends this nuclear security umbrella

0:27:07.000 --> 0:27:10.720
<v Speaker 3>over them. Where do you get off having any tariffs

0:27:10.760 --> 0:27:11.760
<v Speaker 3>on American goods?

0:27:11.960 --> 0:27:12.760
<v Speaker 1>It's all They don't.

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:13.639
<v Speaker 6>They actually don't.

0:27:13.720 --> 0:27:17.000
<v Speaker 2>I think he rolled them back, okay before, but before then.

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:18.159
<v Speaker 6>When the trade war was threatened.

0:27:18.240 --> 0:27:18.679
<v Speaker 4>How is this?

0:27:20.080 --> 0:27:22.359
<v Speaker 1>Who do you think you are? You're tariffing? Are good?

0:27:22.600 --> 0:27:25.720
<v Speaker 1>You wouldn't exist if it wasn't for us. Many such cases.

0:27:28.800 --> 0:27:30.480
<v Speaker 1>Let's move on to Iran.

0:27:30.840 --> 0:27:33.840
<v Speaker 3>This is some very important news that's coming out about

0:27:33.880 --> 0:27:37.959
<v Speaker 3>potential deals. This is a potential bright spot and negotiations

0:27:38.040 --> 0:27:39.920
<v Speaker 3>that are going to begin to start with Iran. Here's

0:27:39.960 --> 0:27:42.720
<v Speaker 3>Trump sounding off about them, much to Bebi's discomfort.

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Let's take a listen.

0:27:43.880 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 8>I think if the talks aren't successful with Iran, I

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:50.879
<v Speaker 8>think Iran is going to be in great danger. And

0:27:50.920 --> 0:27:53.720
<v Speaker 8>I hate to say it great danger because they can't

0:27:53.720 --> 0:27:56.280
<v Speaker 8>have a nuclear weapon. So you know, it's not a

0:27:56.280 --> 0:28:01.439
<v Speaker 8>complicated formula. Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. That's all

0:28:01.480 --> 0:28:03.879
<v Speaker 8>there is. You can't have it. Right now, we have

0:28:04.000 --> 0:28:07.679
<v Speaker 8>countries that have nuclear power that shouldn't have it. But

0:28:08.840 --> 0:28:11.080
<v Speaker 8>I'm sure we'll be able to negotiate out of that

0:28:11.119 --> 0:28:13.600
<v Speaker 8>too as part of this later and down the line.

0:28:14.160 --> 0:28:18.240
<v Speaker 8>But Ran cannot have a nuclear weapon, and if the

0:28:18.400 --> 0:28:22.920
<v Speaker 8>talks are successful, I actually think it'll be a very

0:28:22.960 --> 0:28:25.160
<v Speaker 8>bad day for a rant if that's the case.

0:28:25.720 --> 0:28:27.520
<v Speaker 3>So Trump says that that we are going to be

0:28:27.640 --> 0:28:31.680
<v Speaker 3>continuing direct negotiations with Iran that will begin on Saturday.

0:28:31.800 --> 0:28:35.000
<v Speaker 3>It does appear that they are legitimate, and there's a

0:28:35.040 --> 0:28:37.399
<v Speaker 3>lot going on behind the scenes. Put E two please

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:40.360
<v Speaker 3>up on the screen so people can see. Christ is

0:28:40.360 --> 0:28:43.720
<v Speaker 3>from Barak Revid the Netsa Nyah who whisper quote Natanya,

0:28:43.800 --> 0:28:45.880
<v Speaker 3>who thinks that the chances of a US Iran deal

0:28:46.080 --> 0:28:48.640
<v Speaker 3>are extremely low, but will present to Trump today how

0:28:48.640 --> 0:28:51.600
<v Speaker 3>a good deal should look like. Netsayah, who wants the

0:28:51.760 --> 0:28:56.720
<v Speaker 3>full Libya model, the full dismantling of Iran's nuclear program. Christal,

0:28:56.760 --> 0:28:58.560
<v Speaker 3>can you enlighten me as to why no country on

0:28:58.600 --> 0:29:01.400
<v Speaker 3>Earth whatever agree to the full Libya that's the point.

0:29:02.320 --> 0:29:04.240
<v Speaker 6>How did that go for Libya?

0:29:04.800 --> 0:29:07.520
<v Speaker 2>How did that go for the leader of Libya who

0:29:07.640 --> 0:29:10.960
<v Speaker 2>is now dead and gone. Yeah, I earn on camera

0:29:11.160 --> 0:29:15.360
<v Speaker 2>the which is that is the intent of Venettnya, who

0:29:15.400 --> 0:29:17.760
<v Speaker 2>is to offer a solution that he knows Iran would

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:19.520
<v Speaker 2>in no country would.

0:29:19.360 --> 0:29:20.120
<v Speaker 6>Ever agree to.

0:29:20.720 --> 0:29:23.560
<v Speaker 2>And so that's why I think we should all be

0:29:23.880 --> 0:29:28.200
<v Speaker 2>glad that there are potentially direct talks happening and that

0:29:28.240 --> 0:29:31.520
<v Speaker 2>there is at least some gesture towards making a deal

0:29:31.560 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 2>with the run. But of course the content of those

0:29:33.400 --> 0:29:37.200
<v Speaker 2>talks is going to matter very much. And if BBE

0:29:37.280 --> 0:29:40.360
<v Speaker 2>is pushing the quote unquote Libya model, if Trump is

0:29:40.400 --> 0:29:43.120
<v Speaker 2>taking that seriously, then that is obviously going to be

0:29:43.160 --> 0:29:45.440
<v Speaker 2>a non starter. We don't know whether Trump is taking

0:29:45.440 --> 0:29:47.600
<v Speaker 2>that seriously, whether he has his own ideas Our friend

0:29:47.600 --> 0:29:49.760
<v Speaker 2>doctor Tree to Parsi was pointing out things that Trump

0:29:49.840 --> 0:29:51.760
<v Speaker 2>himself has said in the past about the quote unquote

0:29:51.760 --> 0:29:55.280
<v Speaker 2>Libya model when it was being pushed visa the North Korea.

0:29:55.680 --> 0:29:57.880
<v Speaker 2>He this was an attack on John Bolden. He said,

0:29:57.880 --> 0:30:00.200
<v Speaker 2>what would John Bolton, one of the dumbest people in Washington. No,

0:30:00.360 --> 0:30:02.880
<v Speaker 2>wasn't he the person who's so stupidly set on television

0:30:03.160 --> 0:30:06.480
<v Speaker 2>Libyan solution when describing what the US was going to

0:30:06.520 --> 0:30:08.880
<v Speaker 2>do from North Korea. I've got plenty of other Bolton

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:13.080
<v Speaker 2>stupid stories. So at least in theory, he knows what

0:30:13.200 --> 0:30:15.959
<v Speaker 2>a dumb idea. This is whether in practice it applies

0:30:16.000 --> 0:30:16.680
<v Speaker 2>in the situation.

0:30:16.800 --> 0:30:17.680
<v Speaker 6>We'll have to wait to find out.

0:30:17.760 --> 0:30:18.400
<v Speaker 1>Yeah, exactly.

0:30:18.440 --> 0:30:21.080
<v Speaker 3>And that's where we all just really have to be

0:30:21.240 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 3>very careful about what's all happening right now. For example,

0:30:24.600 --> 0:30:27.400
<v Speaker 3>let's put E three up on the screen. There is

0:30:28.000 --> 0:30:32.080
<v Speaker 3>massive movement of US assets in the Middle East right now,

0:30:32.240 --> 0:30:34.840
<v Speaker 3>quote from Haretz, record breaking US deployment in the Middle

0:30:34.880 --> 0:30:39.840
<v Speaker 3>East amid Trump's nuclear ultimatum for Iran. More US assets

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:42.720
<v Speaker 3>in the region than at any time since October seventh.

0:30:42.800 --> 0:30:46.240
<v Speaker 3>Don't forget, you know, despite signal gait, it wasn't just

0:30:46.320 --> 0:30:49.240
<v Speaker 3>the one off what happened with the Hoothies. We continue

0:30:49.280 --> 0:30:53.440
<v Speaker 3>to bomb the Hoothies on an almost daily basis, basically

0:30:53.480 --> 0:30:57.200
<v Speaker 3>continuing the Biden you know, the Biden operation that was

0:30:57.200 --> 0:31:01.040
<v Speaker 3>a complete failure. Here Trump, for example, we can put

0:31:01.040 --> 0:31:03.560
<v Speaker 3>this on the screen. Uh, this is a video that

0:31:03.680 --> 0:31:07.040
<v Speaker 3>was released a couple of days ago. Trump says, quote

0:31:07.080 --> 0:31:10.040
<v Speaker 3>these who these gathered for instructions on an attack. Oops,

0:31:10.280 --> 0:31:12.520
<v Speaker 3>there will be no attack by these who thies. They

0:31:12.560 --> 0:31:14.920
<v Speaker 3>will never sink our ships again.

0:31:15.760 --> 0:31:19.040
<v Speaker 2>This, by the way, this was this was not who

0:31:19.080 --> 0:31:23.520
<v Speaker 2>they militant rebels. These were tribesmen who were gathered for

0:31:23.600 --> 0:31:26.240
<v Speaker 2>a religious ceremony. And I do think we also have

0:31:26.360 --> 0:31:28.240
<v Speaker 2>to reflect on the fact that it once was a

0:31:28.280 --> 0:31:30.600
<v Speaker 2>scandal when the US.

0:31:30.520 --> 0:31:33.120
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, they would just classify this murdered civilians.

0:31:33.600 --> 0:31:36.320
<v Speaker 2>I mean, this was you know, one of the major

0:31:36.400 --> 0:31:40.959
<v Speaker 2>revelations of wikileace that created you know, international and certainly

0:31:41.000 --> 0:31:45.280
<v Speaker 2>domestic scandal. And now the president just posted himself and

0:31:45.640 --> 0:31:47.240
<v Speaker 2>brigs about it like that's.

0:31:47.160 --> 0:31:51.360
<v Speaker 3>Yeah, no legal authority, no justificating, like, no release of

0:31:51.400 --> 0:31:53.880
<v Speaker 3>like who exactly these people were, what it all meant.

0:31:54.120 --> 0:31:55.000
<v Speaker 1>It's just baked in.

0:31:55.240 --> 0:31:58.600
<v Speaker 3>You're basically killing people to feel good and for purposes

0:31:58.680 --> 0:32:01.640
<v Speaker 3>that's not actually working. There's been no reduction in the

0:32:01.680 --> 0:32:04.560
<v Speaker 3>amount of attacks from the Who theis there is no

0:32:05.160 --> 0:32:08.920
<v Speaker 3>military solution to this, say for a genuine invasion of Yemen.

0:32:09.080 --> 0:32:10.280
<v Speaker 1>Well, and I didn't sign up for that.

0:32:10.360 --> 0:32:13.479
<v Speaker 2>And they're they're considering it, Yeah, they are considering it.

0:32:13.680 --> 0:32:15.800
<v Speaker 2>So we can put this up on the screen from CNN.

0:32:16.800 --> 0:32:19.360
<v Speaker 2>So they kind of, in my opinion, bury the lead here.

0:32:19.440 --> 0:32:21.280
<v Speaker 2>They say, far from being cowed by US air strikes,

0:32:21.320 --> 0:32:24.480
<v Speaker 2>damons who this may be relishing them. But then they

0:32:24.520 --> 0:32:27.520
<v Speaker 2>go on to talk about how there are plans being

0:32:27.600 --> 0:32:32.760
<v Speaker 2>formed for us to potentially assist the previous Yumeni government

0:32:32.800 --> 0:32:34.400
<v Speaker 2>that you know, there's a big civil war between the

0:32:34.440 --> 0:32:37.760
<v Speaker 2>who this and the Yumenis. The Hohothis basically ultimately won

0:32:37.760 --> 0:32:38.440
<v Speaker 2>that civil war.

0:32:39.240 --> 0:32:40.520
<v Speaker 6>But apparently we're.

0:32:40.400 --> 0:32:44.520
<v Speaker 2>Gonna use our troops to support the Yumenis, maybe for

0:32:44.760 --> 0:32:49.000
<v Speaker 2>a ground another ground invasion, in order to deal with

0:32:49.040 --> 0:32:52.600
<v Speaker 2>the Houthis since the you know, just relentless bombing has

0:32:52.800 --> 0:32:55.760
<v Speaker 2>only continued to embolden them, not that they haven't taken

0:32:55.800 --> 0:32:58.440
<v Speaker 2>on damage and that they haven't you know that significant

0:32:59.040 --> 0:33:03.200
<v Speaker 2>Huthi members have not been killed and their capabilities diminished,

0:33:03.280 --> 0:33:06.400
<v Speaker 2>but they are still able to operate, and you know,

0:33:06.440 --> 0:33:09.080
<v Speaker 2>it sort of only does strengthen their domestic position. Really,

0:33:09.200 --> 0:33:11.680
<v Speaker 2>so this is these are the plans that are being

0:33:11.760 --> 0:33:13.680
<v Speaker 2>hatched right now to potentially get us involved in a

0:33:13.760 --> 0:33:15.200
<v Speaker 2>ground invasion in Yemen.

0:33:15.120 --> 0:33:18.800
<v Speaker 3>That worked really well for the Saudias and their bombing campaign.

0:33:18.920 --> 0:33:21.760
<v Speaker 3>And finally, I don't know, I still don't yet know what.

0:33:21.680 --> 0:33:22.040
<v Speaker 1>To make of this.

0:33:22.120 --> 0:33:24.320
<v Speaker 3>Let's put this on the screen. This is from Tucker Carlson.

0:33:24.640 --> 0:33:26.640
<v Speaker 3>Whatever you think of tariffs, it is clear now it

0:33:26.720 --> 0:33:28.440
<v Speaker 3>is the worst possible time for the United States to

0:33:28.440 --> 0:33:30.040
<v Speaker 3>participate in military strike on Iran.

0:33:30.280 --> 0:33:31.000
<v Speaker 1>We can't afford it.

0:33:31.080 --> 0:33:33.760
<v Speaker 3>Thousands of Americans who die, We'd lose a war that follows.

0:33:34.000 --> 0:33:36.080
<v Speaker 3>Nothing could be more destructive to our country, and yet

0:33:36.120 --> 0:33:38.479
<v Speaker 3>we are closer than ever thanks to unrelenting pressure from

0:33:38.560 --> 0:33:41.920
<v Speaker 3>neo cons This is suicidal. Anyone advocating for conflict with

0:33:42.000 --> 0:33:44.000
<v Speaker 3>Iran is not an ally of the United States, but

0:33:44.200 --> 0:33:48.320
<v Speaker 3>an enemy. I don't know what the impetus for this is.

0:33:48.640 --> 0:33:52.080
<v Speaker 3>I can only assume that it's clear that he knows

0:33:52.120 --> 0:33:55.960
<v Speaker 3>something that I don't know, or is hearing something clearly

0:33:56.160 --> 0:33:58.960
<v Speaker 3>and takes it seriously enough to be able to put

0:33:58.960 --> 0:34:02.040
<v Speaker 3>this out there. Because if you put together the bab visit,

0:34:02.520 --> 0:34:07.960
<v Speaker 3>the military assets there, the houthy military campaign, the fact

0:34:08.000 --> 0:34:11.480
<v Speaker 3>that Mike Wallace, the moron, gets to survive and live

0:34:11.520 --> 0:34:13.360
<v Speaker 3>another day in the White House.

0:34:13.719 --> 0:34:15.399
<v Speaker 1>They keep assuring me he is going to be fired

0:34:15.440 --> 0:34:16.040
<v Speaker 1>in a few months.

0:34:16.200 --> 0:34:17.560
<v Speaker 7>Not going to hold my breath.

0:34:17.440 --> 0:34:18.120
<v Speaker 1>For that one.

0:34:18.400 --> 0:34:21.879
<v Speaker 3>I think there's obviously something that's happening, like the drum

0:34:21.880 --> 0:34:25.680
<v Speaker 3>beats are there. I also saw the attack on this

0:34:25.960 --> 0:34:28.839
<v Speaker 3>was that it was unpatriotic to say that America would

0:34:28.840 --> 0:34:31.759
<v Speaker 3>lose a war that follows or to say that it's

0:34:31.760 --> 0:34:34.719
<v Speaker 3>preposterous that thousands of Americans would die.

0:34:34.760 --> 0:34:36.600
<v Speaker 1>Does anyone want to alert all.

0:34:36.480 --> 0:34:39.160
<v Speaker 3>Of these neocon geniuses to the number of US troops

0:34:39.200 --> 0:34:41.319
<v Speaker 3>that are currently in the Middle East? Like what you

0:34:41.320 --> 0:34:44.200
<v Speaker 3>think They're just going to sit there quietly the Iranians

0:34:44.239 --> 0:34:47.239
<v Speaker 3>if we do start some sort of military conflict with them,

0:34:47.360 --> 0:34:49.720
<v Speaker 3>is there any reason to put any of those people's

0:34:49.760 --> 0:34:51.759
<v Speaker 3>lives at risk? And also, do you know how much

0:34:51.800 --> 0:34:55.120
<v Speaker 3>it's cost the current just Trump military campaign two hundred

0:34:55.160 --> 0:34:59.160
<v Speaker 3>and six million dollars for the current Houthy operation. I

0:34:59.160 --> 0:35:02.279
<v Speaker 3>don't see dose anybody talking about that. Think about it,

0:35:02.280 --> 0:35:04.000
<v Speaker 3>if you had a two hundred and six million dollar

0:35:04.320 --> 0:35:08.080
<v Speaker 3>operation which was an abject to complete failure, continuation of

0:35:08.120 --> 0:35:10.880
<v Speaker 3>a failed policy, that sounds like a perfect job for Doge,

0:35:11.080 --> 0:35:11.600
<v Speaker 3>don't you think.

0:35:11.640 --> 0:35:11.719
<v Speaker 8>So.

0:35:11.760 --> 0:35:14.880
<v Speaker 3>There's so many layers upon layers of a lot of

0:35:14.880 --> 0:35:16.439
<v Speaker 3>this stupidity that's happening right now.

0:35:16.680 --> 0:35:21.400
<v Speaker 2>There's also some past indications that are troubling about the

0:35:21.440 --> 0:35:24.920
<v Speaker 2>way Trump thinks about a potential Iran war. So he

0:35:24.960 --> 0:35:27.960
<v Speaker 2>had famously claimed in twenty eleven and twenty twelve that

0:35:28.040 --> 0:35:30.520
<v Speaker 2>Obama is going to start with war with Iran in

0:35:30.640 --> 0:35:31.680
<v Speaker 2>order to get reelected.

0:35:31.719 --> 0:35:33.320
<v Speaker 6>This is something that he tweeted.

0:35:32.960 --> 0:35:35.799
<v Speaker 2>Out, thinking that oh, that would cause this rally around

0:35:35.800 --> 0:35:38.920
<v Speaker 2>the flag effect and that that would help get Obama elected,

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:41.279
<v Speaker 2>which isn't I mean, that's just insane to me that

0:35:41.400 --> 0:35:44.400
<v Speaker 2>to think at this point, especially where we are now,

0:35:44.600 --> 0:35:47.360
<v Speaker 2>that there would be any sort of US domestic appetite

0:35:47.560 --> 0:35:51.080
<v Speaker 2>for some giant war in the Middle East is complete insanity.

0:35:51.120 --> 0:35:53.839
<v Speaker 2>But at least in the past he has thought that way.

0:35:54.120 --> 0:35:56.959
<v Speaker 2>And so, you know, is he thinking that this would

0:35:56.960 --> 0:36:00.600
<v Speaker 2>be a way to bolster his flagging domestic folitt standing.

0:36:00.920 --> 0:36:03.560
<v Speaker 2>I think that's a possibility. I think when you put

0:36:03.600 --> 0:36:06.319
<v Speaker 2>together so ken Klippenstein has of course been doing great

0:36:06.360 --> 0:36:10.000
<v Speaker 2>reporting about the war plans that have been hatched, including

0:36:10.040 --> 0:36:13.680
<v Speaker 2>potential nuclear options for a war with a RN. He's

0:36:13.719 --> 0:36:18.960
<v Speaker 2>also reporting on this mass buildup of military assets in

0:36:19.080 --> 0:36:20.799
<v Speaker 2>the region. I'm just read a little bit from his

0:36:20.840 --> 0:36:23.600
<v Speaker 2>latest report. He says the largest single deployment of self

0:36:23.640 --> 0:36:27.040
<v Speaker 2>bombers in US history, the Pentagon has sent six B

0:36:27.160 --> 0:36:30.200
<v Speaker 2>two Spirit aircraft to Diego, Garcia and the Indian Ocean.

0:36:30.200 --> 0:36:33.240
<v Speaker 2>The long range bombers, which are uniquely suited to evade

0:36:33.320 --> 0:36:36.800
<v Speaker 2>Iranian air defenses and can carry America's most potent bunker

0:36:36.840 --> 0:36:40.040
<v Speaker 2>busting weapons flew in from Missouri last week in a

0:36:40.080 --> 0:36:42.080
<v Speaker 2>little noticed to operation. The B two is carried not

0:36:42.160 --> 0:36:44.520
<v Speaker 2>just bombs, but a message for Iran. Do you see

0:36:44.520 --> 0:36:47.920
<v Speaker 2>our sword? As one retired general told Newsmax this week.

0:36:48.440 --> 0:36:52.040
<v Speaker 2>Now there is a possibility, Sager, certainly, that all of

0:36:52.080 --> 0:36:55.560
<v Speaker 2>the military build up is meant as a credible military

0:36:55.760 --> 0:36:59.040
<v Speaker 2>threat to try to secure a better deal with Iran.

0:36:59.200 --> 0:37:01.960
<v Speaker 2>That's what we should all hoping for. But I do

0:37:02.000 --> 0:37:04.120
<v Speaker 2>think there are a lot of troubling indications. And all

0:37:04.160 --> 0:37:06.480
<v Speaker 2>of the neocon think tanks in DC. You cover this

0:37:06.520 --> 0:37:09.480
<v Speaker 2>from Quincy Institute that's been tracking this, they are beating

0:37:09.480 --> 0:37:12.320
<v Speaker 2>the war drums. And you know, if you have people

0:37:12.360 --> 0:37:14.440
<v Speaker 2>like Tucker, who are obviously very well read in and

0:37:14.520 --> 0:37:17.560
<v Speaker 2>very well sourced in this administration sounding the alarm, I

0:37:17.600 --> 0:37:23.040
<v Speaker 2>think we should all be very concerned. So Sixty Minutes

0:37:23.160 --> 0:37:27.719
<v Speaker 2>did a fantastic piece on Sunday breaking down what they

0:37:27.760 --> 0:37:31.120
<v Speaker 2>were able to figure out about the men who were

0:37:31.120 --> 0:37:34.120
<v Speaker 2>sent under the Alien Enemies Act to that notorious prison

0:37:34.160 --> 0:37:35.040
<v Speaker 2>in El Salvador.

0:37:35.360 --> 0:37:36.680
<v Speaker 6>We can put this up on the screen.

0:37:36.800 --> 0:37:39.960
<v Speaker 2>So the government has not released the names of these

0:37:40.040 --> 0:37:42.279
<v Speaker 2>individuals these two hundred and thirty eight migrants who were

0:37:42.280 --> 0:37:45.160
<v Speaker 2>sent to this Salvador In mega prison. But they were

0:37:45.200 --> 0:37:48.279
<v Speaker 2>able to get their hands on some leaked government documents

0:37:48.360 --> 0:37:53.480
<v Speaker 2>and dug into their you know, purported criminal records and

0:37:53.600 --> 0:37:55.520
<v Speaker 2>what they found, because remember we were told these are

0:37:55.520 --> 0:37:57.680
<v Speaker 2>gang members, these are the worst of the worst, et cetera.

0:37:58.360 --> 0:38:01.480
<v Speaker 2>What they actually found is that for seventy five percent

0:38:01.920 --> 0:38:06.880
<v Speaker 2>of these Venezuelans they had no criminal record whatsoever. There

0:38:06.880 --> 0:38:10.279
<v Speaker 2>were about thirteen percent that they were not able to determine,

0:38:10.360 --> 0:38:14.080
<v Speaker 2>and for the remaining twenty two percent, they did have

0:38:14.160 --> 0:38:18.160
<v Speaker 2>criminal records, the vast majority for things like theft, shoplifting,

0:38:18.280 --> 0:38:21.200
<v Speaker 2>and trespassing. At the same time, we can put these

0:38:21.200 --> 0:38:25.640
<v Speaker 2>images up on the screen. They delved in particular into

0:38:25.680 --> 0:38:29.280
<v Speaker 2>the case of Andre. He is the gay makeup artist

0:38:29.680 --> 0:38:33.719
<v Speaker 2>who was legally applying for asylum and was accused by

0:38:33.719 --> 0:38:37.200
<v Speaker 2>the government of being a gang member based on his tattoos.

0:38:37.840 --> 0:38:40.239
<v Speaker 2>They spoke to his lawyer. They also were able to

0:38:40.320 --> 0:38:44.359
<v Speaker 2>track down these horrific pictures of him being sentenced into

0:38:44.400 --> 0:38:47.160
<v Speaker 2>this prison from which no one can communicate with him.

0:38:47.200 --> 0:38:50.480
<v Speaker 2>He may be here now for life. And they also

0:38:50.520 --> 0:38:54.080
<v Speaker 2>went back through his social media postings and found absolutely

0:38:54.120 --> 0:38:58.880
<v Speaker 2>no indication of gang involvement whatsoever. So at the same time,

0:38:59.440 --> 0:39:03.160
<v Speaker 2>the Supreme Court has issued a significant victory for the

0:39:03.200 --> 0:39:07.560
<v Speaker 2>Trump administration with regards to these deportations to El Salvador.

0:39:07.840 --> 0:39:10.160
<v Speaker 6>Can put this tear sheet up on the screen.

0:39:10.360 --> 0:39:14.919
<v Speaker 2>They're lifting the temporary restraining order on Trump's removals under

0:39:14.920 --> 0:39:17.920
<v Speaker 2>the Alien Enemies Act. However, this was a five to

0:39:18.000 --> 0:39:20.560
<v Speaker 2>four decision. There were important to sense what this means

0:39:20.600 --> 0:39:23.160
<v Speaker 2>going forward, both for people here and for those who

0:39:23.160 --> 0:39:25.239
<v Speaker 2>have already been sent to This prison is a little

0:39:25.239 --> 0:39:27.840
<v Speaker 2>bit complex. So we wanted to bring in some legal

0:39:27.880 --> 0:39:30.879
<v Speaker 2>backup here. Let's go ahead and bring in Pisco. He's

0:39:30.920 --> 0:39:33.960
<v Speaker 2>a YouTuber, but more importantly for our purposes, he's a lawyer.

0:39:34.000 --> 0:39:37.000
<v Speaker 2>He's a a litigator and has done pro bono work

0:39:37.000 --> 0:39:39.319
<v Speaker 2>in immigration. I've really been relying on him for his

0:39:39.680 --> 0:39:41.440
<v Speaker 2>analysis of the legal challenges here.

0:39:41.440 --> 0:39:43.640
<v Speaker 1>Great to have you, Peace Go appreciate it.

0:39:43.640 --> 0:39:44.600
<v Speaker 7>Thank you so much, Crystal.

0:39:44.680 --> 0:39:46.399
<v Speaker 2>Yeah, of course. So let's just start with the most

0:39:46.400 --> 0:39:51.000
<v Speaker 2>basic question. Was this a true win for the administration.

0:39:51.920 --> 0:39:54.839
<v Speaker 10>It was a true win for the administration. There is

0:39:55.000 --> 0:39:58.440
<v Speaker 10>a core unanimous holding here that is generally good, but

0:39:58.640 --> 0:40:01.319
<v Speaker 10>It's kind of something that but most people think take

0:40:01.360 --> 0:40:03.640
<v Speaker 10>for granted, which is that people who are going to

0:40:03.640 --> 0:40:06.760
<v Speaker 10>be deported are, you know, have access to basic procedural

0:40:06.880 --> 0:40:10.440
<v Speaker 10>due process. And so a unanimous Supreme Court nine zero

0:40:10.600 --> 0:40:14.839
<v Speaker 10>held that the Trump administration was violating people's procedural due

0:40:14.840 --> 0:40:17.520
<v Speaker 10>process rights, or at the very least was they're entitled

0:40:17.560 --> 0:40:19.799
<v Speaker 10>to notice an opportunity to be heard before they're sent

0:40:19.880 --> 0:40:23.520
<v Speaker 10>off to this gulog in El Salvador. But at the

0:40:23.600 --> 0:40:25.520
<v Speaker 10>end of the day, the temporary Restraining Order, which was

0:40:25.520 --> 0:40:28.440
<v Speaker 10>protecting a lot of these migrants, were in fact vacated

0:40:28.440 --> 0:40:29.880
<v Speaker 10>by the Supreme Court. And that's a huge win for

0:40:29.920 --> 0:40:31.640
<v Speaker 10>the Tump administration for reasons that we can get into.

0:40:31.960 --> 0:40:37.560
<v Speaker 3>So can you explain the upholding of due process as

0:40:37.600 --> 0:40:40.920
<v Speaker 3>I understand it, It is a different way that they

0:40:40.960 --> 0:40:43.480
<v Speaker 3>can apply for scrutiny. There was what was it, the

0:40:43.560 --> 0:40:48.200
<v Speaker 3>Administrative Procedures Act, and instead they rule the Supreme Court

0:40:48.400 --> 0:40:51.720
<v Speaker 3>says that there must be an access to a habeas corpus,

0:40:51.760 --> 0:40:54.719
<v Speaker 3>but in the jurisdiction of where they're being held. So

0:40:55.320 --> 0:40:58.160
<v Speaker 3>just translate the things that I just said into something

0:40:58.160 --> 0:40:59.560
<v Speaker 3>a normal person can understand.

0:41:00.120 --> 0:41:03.680
<v Speaker 10>So what they said was the exclusive remedy for individuals

0:41:03.719 --> 0:41:07.160
<v Speaker 10>who are labeled alien enemies under the Alien Enemies Act

0:41:07.200 --> 0:41:10.800
<v Speaker 10>is to go through a habeas petition and hevieous corpuses

0:41:10.880 --> 0:41:14.279
<v Speaker 10>Latin for produce the body. And it essentially it's a

0:41:14.280 --> 0:41:17.879
<v Speaker 10>specific kind of old writ that has traditionally been used

0:41:17.880 --> 0:41:20.840
<v Speaker 10>in these kinds of cases where people will be allowed

0:41:21.080 --> 0:41:24.640
<v Speaker 10>to challenge whether they in fact are alien enemies. And

0:41:24.680 --> 0:41:27.040
<v Speaker 10>the court actually said maybe even suggesting they could challenge

0:41:27.080 --> 0:41:29.880
<v Speaker 10>the proclamation as a whole, and contrast that to the

0:41:29.920 --> 0:41:34.040
<v Speaker 10>Administrative Procedures Act, which is what some of these a

0:41:34.200 --> 0:41:37.319
<v Speaker 10>remedy for a lot of these sort of agency type

0:41:37.600 --> 0:41:40.600
<v Speaker 10>actions trying to strike down large agency action, and under

0:41:40.600 --> 0:41:43.000
<v Speaker 10>that procedure they could apply kind of on the general

0:41:43.040 --> 0:41:46.319
<v Speaker 10>policy as opposed to an individual petition to sort of

0:41:46.360 --> 0:41:51.840
<v Speaker 10>attack broad policy that the petitioners think is unlawful, and

0:41:51.840 --> 0:41:54.760
<v Speaker 10>in that situation you could file in DC. The ultimate

0:41:54.760 --> 0:41:57.319
<v Speaker 10>effect of this is you're going to be funneled into

0:41:57.400 --> 0:42:00.760
<v Speaker 10>all of these pro trump courts and tech in Louisiana

0:42:00.800 --> 0:42:04.520
<v Speaker 10>in the Fifth Circuit, where they're a lot less willing to,

0:42:04.600 --> 0:42:07.040
<v Speaker 10>you know, give these detainees the time of day than

0:42:07.280 --> 0:42:08.399
<v Speaker 10>in DC or New York.

0:42:08.480 --> 0:42:09.520
<v Speaker 6>Okay, so let's talk a.

0:42:09.520 --> 0:42:11.359
<v Speaker 2>Little bit more about this, because I think this piece

0:42:11.400 --> 0:42:13.520
<v Speaker 2>is really important because on the one hand, you go, okay, well,

0:42:13.520 --> 0:42:16.480
<v Speaker 2>they said the Trump administration can restart these deportations under

0:42:16.520 --> 0:42:18.960
<v Speaker 2>the Alien Enemies Act. On the other hand, all my

0:42:19.239 --> 0:42:22.840
<v Speaker 2>justices said, what you've been doing is illegal because the

0:42:22.840 --> 0:42:26.480
<v Speaker 2>administration's position was no due process whatsoever. Steven Miller has

0:42:26.520 --> 0:42:27.480
<v Speaker 2>been very vocal about this.

0:42:27.600 --> 0:42:29.640
<v Speaker 6>Christine know elm etcter no due process.

0:42:29.800 --> 0:42:33.040
<v Speaker 2>Supreme Court is saying unanimously that is not correct. You

0:42:33.200 --> 0:42:36.719
<v Speaker 2>have to offer what they describe as quote unquote reasonable notice,

0:42:36.840 --> 0:42:41.200
<v Speaker 2>an opportunity to file habeas corpus lawsuits in the jurisdictions

0:42:41.239 --> 0:42:44.120
<v Speaker 2>where they are being held. Can you talk to us

0:42:44.120 --> 0:42:48.439
<v Speaker 2>on like a real world, practical basis what this will

0:42:48.480 --> 0:42:53.280
<v Speaker 2>actually mean for immigrants who are being threatened with deportation

0:42:53.360 --> 0:42:57.560
<v Speaker 2>to present under the Alien Enemies Act, Especially because you

0:42:57.560 --> 0:43:00.719
<v Speaker 2>know the definition of quote unquote reasonable notice. It's not

0:43:00.800 --> 0:43:03.600
<v Speaker 2>like they say you have to give them a week.

0:43:03.880 --> 0:43:06.640
<v Speaker 2>You have to give them even twenty four hours. They're

0:43:06.760 --> 0:43:10.920
<v Speaker 2>leaving it up to the administration to define what, in

0:43:11.000 --> 0:43:14.280
<v Speaker 2>their view is quote unquote reasonable notice.

0:43:14.840 --> 0:43:16.319
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, you totally hit the nail on the head.

0:43:16.320 --> 0:43:18.600
<v Speaker 10>Like, on the formalism of it, it totally makes sense

0:43:18.640 --> 0:43:20.440
<v Speaker 10>right that this would be a great holding. Right there,

0:43:20.560 --> 0:43:23.120
<v Speaker 10>they're holding that you have procedural due process rights, you

0:43:23.120 --> 0:43:25.160
<v Speaker 10>have a notice to be an opportunity be heard, and

0:43:25.200 --> 0:43:27.320
<v Speaker 10>you have the right to notice, which, by the way,

0:43:27.160 --> 0:43:30.000
<v Speaker 10>the Trump administration was in court arguing that we don't

0:43:30.000 --> 0:43:31.799
<v Speaker 10>even need tell their lawyers where they are. So on

0:43:31.840 --> 0:43:33.920
<v Speaker 10>that basic premise, you would think, wow, it's a great holding.

0:43:34.160 --> 0:43:36.560
<v Speaker 10>The problem is we're leaving we're living in the real world,

0:43:36.800 --> 0:43:39.080
<v Speaker 10>and the reality of the situation is the Trump administration

0:43:39.400 --> 0:43:42.080
<v Speaker 10>is already running the government on emergency basis. You can

0:43:42.080 --> 0:43:44.520
<v Speaker 10>see this with the tariff situation, where they're declaring fake

0:43:44.600 --> 0:43:47.760
<v Speaker 10>emergencies and they're to invoke this limited kind of teriff

0:43:47.800 --> 0:43:50.479
<v Speaker 10>authority to have these broad standing tariffs. And the same

0:43:50.480 --> 0:43:53.839
<v Speaker 10>thing is true in respective immigration, that you can't rely

0:43:53.920 --> 0:43:56.680
<v Speaker 10>on this administration to be good faith about this situation

0:43:56.840 --> 0:44:00.560
<v Speaker 10>and actually give them their habeas petitions that they seem

0:44:00.600 --> 0:44:01.480
<v Speaker 10>to admit that they're owned.

0:44:01.560 --> 0:44:01.680
<v Speaker 7>Right.

0:44:01.719 --> 0:44:04.000
<v Speaker 10>One of the lines that the majority of the Percurium

0:44:04.000 --> 0:44:07.480
<v Speaker 10>decision relies on is a notion that the Trump administration

0:44:07.640 --> 0:44:11.120
<v Speaker 10>admits that these people are allowed to have habeas petitions,

0:44:11.160 --> 0:44:13.680
<v Speaker 10>but that right is meaningless if you're throwing them onto

0:44:13.719 --> 0:44:15.759
<v Speaker 10>a plane and taking them out of the country before

0:44:15.800 --> 0:44:18.000
<v Speaker 10>they have a chance to like hire a lawyer or

0:44:18.040 --> 0:44:19.880
<v Speaker 10>talk to their family. You know, most of these people

0:44:20.320 --> 0:44:22.200
<v Speaker 10>probably don't have access to lawyers. Most of the people

0:44:22.200 --> 0:44:25.279
<v Speaker 10>who are actually deported unlawfully, now that we know from

0:44:25.280 --> 0:44:27.600
<v Speaker 10>the Supreme Court, didn't have an opportunity to have a

0:44:27.640 --> 0:44:32.480
<v Speaker 10>real chance to file a petition. The problem is, of course,

0:44:32.600 --> 0:44:35.399
<v Speaker 10>is the government's interpretation and the Trump administration being bad

0:44:35.440 --> 0:44:37.879
<v Speaker 10>faith and they're going to interpret reasonable to me, who knows,

0:44:37.880 --> 0:44:40.920
<v Speaker 10>you know, a day thirty minutes, this administration is you know,

0:44:41.000 --> 0:44:43.480
<v Speaker 10>willing to do whatever it takes to get their agenda done.

0:44:43.480 --> 0:44:45.480
<v Speaker 10>And you saw as soon as the decision came down,

0:44:45.640 --> 0:44:47.440
<v Speaker 10>Stephen Miller is saying, you know, we're starting the planes

0:44:47.480 --> 0:44:48.879
<v Speaker 10>right now, We're going to deport them right away.

0:44:49.000 --> 0:44:50.319
<v Speaker 7>And so that's the big problem is that we.

0:44:50.280 --> 0:44:52.160
<v Speaker 10>Live in the real world, and in the real world,

0:44:52.320 --> 0:44:53.840
<v Speaker 10>all these cases are going to go to Texas in

0:44:53.840 --> 0:44:56.080
<v Speaker 10>the Fifth Circuit, where they're not going to be as sympathetic,

0:44:56.360 --> 0:44:59.319
<v Speaker 10>and we have an administration who's not going to be

0:44:59.400 --> 0:45:02.000
<v Speaker 10>you know, inclined to give them their actual due process rights,

0:45:02.040 --> 0:45:04.400
<v Speaker 10>and right now there is no order directing them not

0:45:04.480 --> 0:45:06.239
<v Speaker 10>to do so, it's just like the general opinion of

0:45:06.280 --> 0:45:08.200
<v Speaker 10>the court that they're not supposed to violate.

0:45:08.400 --> 0:45:11.560
<v Speaker 3>What is the practical meaning of reasonable time, like, let's say,

0:45:11.600 --> 0:45:14.880
<v Speaker 3>compared to a criminal justice proceding or a normal deportation hearing.

0:45:16.120 --> 0:45:18.279
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, when you say what the practical meaning.

0:45:18.120 --> 0:45:20.520
<v Speaker 3>Is, what, like, you know, obviously it's a term that

0:45:20.640 --> 0:45:22.640
<v Speaker 3>is being said to the government. I assume they can

0:45:22.680 --> 0:45:25.279
<v Speaker 3>interpret it to some sort of standard. What does it

0:45:25.320 --> 0:45:26.000
<v Speaker 3>normally look like?

0:45:27.080 --> 0:45:29.279
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, So it's like in the law, if you've ever

0:45:29.320 --> 0:45:32.279
<v Speaker 10>seen that the picture of Atlas holding up the world

0:45:32.600 --> 0:45:35.680
<v Speaker 10>and the underneath it, it's like the word reasonable. And

0:45:35.760 --> 0:45:39.200
<v Speaker 10>so I can't define in strict contours what the exact

0:45:39.400 --> 0:45:42.160
<v Speaker 10>amount of time is. You know, in a typical case

0:45:42.400 --> 0:45:44.960
<v Speaker 10>to respond to a complaint, it's you know, a matter

0:45:45.040 --> 0:45:47.040
<v Speaker 10>of weeks, two three weeks, you know, a month to

0:45:47.040 --> 0:45:49.000
<v Speaker 10>respond to like a civil complaint or something like that,

0:45:49.160 --> 0:45:52.600
<v Speaker 10>sometimes a bit longer. And so I think that if

0:45:52.600 --> 0:45:55.400
<v Speaker 10>you were to give these individuals some weeks maybe a

0:45:55.440 --> 0:45:58.080
<v Speaker 10>month to respond, I think that would be reasonable. Given

0:45:58.120 --> 0:46:01.840
<v Speaker 10>the other kinds of general litigation practices.

0:46:01.400 --> 0:46:03.040
<v Speaker 7>That we have and the other kind of time limits.

0:46:03.480 --> 0:46:06.840
<v Speaker 10>But again, you know, is there a strict legal holding

0:46:06.880 --> 0:46:09.560
<v Speaker 10>about what reasonable means in the context of removal proceedings.

0:46:09.840 --> 0:46:13.640
<v Speaker 10>The government also has access to expected removal procedures peceadures

0:46:13.680 --> 0:46:16.640
<v Speaker 10>in the context of the Immigration Nationality Act, where there's

0:46:16.680 --> 0:46:18.400
<v Speaker 10>not much time at all and there's not much procedure

0:46:18.400 --> 0:46:21.000
<v Speaker 10>other than you know, hearing before an immigration judge.

0:46:21.000 --> 0:46:23.040
<v Speaker 7>And so it's a good question and one that we

0:46:23.120 --> 0:46:24.200
<v Speaker 7>need to contend.

0:46:23.880 --> 0:46:26.560
<v Speaker 10>With now that you know that's the words of the

0:46:26.560 --> 0:46:29.440
<v Speaker 10>Supreme Court that the administration is left to interpret.

0:46:29.719 --> 0:46:31.600
<v Speaker 2>What does this mean for the people who already were

0:46:31.600 --> 0:46:33.920
<v Speaker 2>wrongly sent to El salvad Or with no due process.

0:46:34.000 --> 0:46:37.600
<v Speaker 2>I mean, we I just covered the sixty minutes fantastic

0:46:37.640 --> 0:46:41.480
<v Speaker 2>piece that they did, you know, uncovering this government document listing. Okay,

0:46:41.760 --> 0:46:47.160
<v Speaker 2>here's who they actually sent indefinitely into this notorious Megaprison,

0:46:47.760 --> 0:46:49.760
<v Speaker 2>seventy five percent of whom.

0:46:49.560 --> 0:46:50.680
<v Speaker 6>Zero criminal record.

0:46:51.400 --> 0:46:54.239
<v Speaker 2>The administration themselves has already admitted that at least one

0:46:54.960 --> 0:46:57.200
<v Speaker 2>was done in complete error.

0:46:57.800 --> 0:47:00.520
<v Speaker 6>So what is is there any.

0:47:00.360 --> 0:47:05.239
<v Speaker 2>Recourse for these individuals who have already been sent and

0:47:05.680 --> 0:47:08.320
<v Speaker 2>illegally sent at this point, according to what the Supreme

0:47:08.360 --> 0:47:09.640
<v Speaker 2>Court had to say to this person.

0:47:10.560 --> 0:47:14.080
<v Speaker 10>It's a great point, Crystal, this and the descent brings

0:47:14.120 --> 0:47:17.839
<v Speaker 10>this up. You should think of this opinion as dovetailing

0:47:17.880 --> 0:47:20.800
<v Speaker 10>with what's happening to mister Abdergo Garcia. In the case

0:47:20.960 --> 0:47:25.000
<v Speaker 10>of the individual, he's Salvadorian. He was granted with holding

0:47:25.040 --> 0:47:28.680
<v Speaker 10>a removal and the administration accepts that it was illegal

0:47:28.719 --> 0:47:32.120
<v Speaker 10>to deport this individual to El Salvador, to scat And

0:47:32.560 --> 0:47:35.200
<v Speaker 10>you're asking what can now be done for these individuals

0:47:35.239 --> 0:47:37.920
<v Speaker 10>who are already deported illegally right because they weren't given

0:47:37.960 --> 0:47:40.200
<v Speaker 10>their day in court, as the Supreme Court has now recognized.

0:47:40.400 --> 0:47:42.520
<v Speaker 7>And the answer is, this does not resolve that question.

0:47:42.719 --> 0:47:44.800
<v Speaker 10>There's another petition that's going to be before the Supreme

0:47:44.840 --> 0:47:48.279
<v Speaker 10>Court asking the uncomfortable question, which is, once you are

0:47:48.320 --> 0:47:51.560
<v Speaker 10>in the hands of a foreign government, can the court

0:47:51.800 --> 0:47:56.080
<v Speaker 10>order the US government to bring you back? And there

0:47:56.080 --> 0:47:57.880
<v Speaker 10>are complications. I want to give you a sort of

0:47:58.080 --> 0:47:59.960
<v Speaker 10>an example of the Trump administration.

0:48:00.120 --> 0:48:02.160
<v Speaker 2>Well, and let me put while you're talking, just guys

0:48:02.200 --> 0:48:04.520
<v Speaker 2>through five F five, I believe up on the screen,

0:48:04.560 --> 0:48:09.560
<v Speaker 2>which refers to the recent Supreme Court movement here with

0:48:09.600 --> 0:48:12.520
<v Speaker 2>regard to this particular case where they've now temporarily blocked

0:48:12.560 --> 0:48:16.320
<v Speaker 2>the order requiring an immediate return of this wrongly deported migrant,

0:48:16.320 --> 0:48:19.120
<v Speaker 2>but they haven't made an actual decision on the merits here.

0:48:20.480 --> 0:48:23.320
<v Speaker 10>So the Supreme Court issued an administrative stay. You shouldn't

0:48:23.360 --> 0:48:26.240
<v Speaker 10>read too much into that decision. It's not a merit

0:48:26.280 --> 0:48:29.279
<v Speaker 10>to stay, which means there's no indication from where the

0:48:29.320 --> 0:48:32.239
<v Speaker 10>Court's going to lie ultimately on this decision. But it's

0:48:32.280 --> 0:48:35.480
<v Speaker 10>important to think about this issue because it's a thorny issue.

0:48:35.640 --> 0:48:37.960
<v Speaker 10>On the one hand, think of the government's perspective. Imagine

0:48:38.000 --> 0:48:40.640
<v Speaker 10>that there were an order from a US court that

0:48:40.719 --> 0:48:44.200
<v Speaker 10>said some of the effect of, hey, you illegally sent

0:48:44.320 --> 0:48:47.600
<v Speaker 10>someone over to Gaza, and now that US citizen is

0:48:47.960 --> 0:48:51.000
<v Speaker 10>a hostage, let's say we're ordering you to bring him back.

0:48:51.200 --> 0:48:54.600
<v Speaker 10>You can imagine how that might seem like an unwarranted

0:48:54.600 --> 0:48:58.120
<v Speaker 10>intrusion into the executive prerogative to negotiate with Gaza. Or

0:48:58.160 --> 0:49:00.840
<v Speaker 10>if it were think about Britney Grinder in the hands

0:49:00.840 --> 0:49:03.320
<v Speaker 10>of the Russian Federation. Supposed that the government is alleged

0:49:03.320 --> 0:49:06.480
<v Speaker 10>to do something illegal that brought about that situation, and

0:49:06.920 --> 0:49:09.600
<v Speaker 10>a district court somewhere just orders the United States to

0:49:09.640 --> 0:49:12.319
<v Speaker 10>bring them back out of Russian detention. That could seem

0:49:12.400 --> 0:49:15.200
<v Speaker 10>like a crazy standard to allow all these courts to

0:49:15.440 --> 0:49:17.360
<v Speaker 10>intrude them to the executive progatives. So you have to

0:49:17.440 --> 0:49:20.759
<v Speaker 10>understand the government's perspective there. But the difference here and

0:49:20.880 --> 0:49:23.160
<v Speaker 10>what I think is the right outcome and why the

0:49:23.200 --> 0:49:26.439
<v Speaker 10>Fourth Circuit did not get rid of this district court

0:49:26.520 --> 0:49:29.080
<v Speaker 10>order to bring mister Bregogarcia back, is this is not

0:49:29.239 --> 0:49:32.560
<v Speaker 10>like those situations. This is very much like a contracting relationship.

0:49:32.680 --> 0:49:36.799
<v Speaker 10>The US government is hiring the El Salvadorian president to

0:49:37.000 --> 0:49:40.400
<v Speaker 10>essentially operate immigration attention on the US government's behalf. And

0:49:40.520 --> 0:49:42.080
<v Speaker 10>based on their statements, in the fact that the US

0:49:42.120 --> 0:49:44.560
<v Speaker 10>government is not willing to say that they can't bring

0:49:44.600 --> 0:49:47.279
<v Speaker 10>him back, it seems obvious who's in control here, who

0:49:47.280 --> 0:49:49.160
<v Speaker 10>has the power here, and that the US government, if

0:49:49.200 --> 0:49:52.359
<v Speaker 10>they wanted to, could absolutely bring mister bregog Garcia back.

0:49:52.400 --> 0:49:55.480
<v Speaker 10>And it's shocking that they have admitted that he is

0:49:56.040 --> 0:49:59.439
<v Speaker 10>illegally removed from to l Salvador, but they haven't even

0:49:59.440 --> 0:50:01.439
<v Speaker 10>tried to bring him back at all, or even state

0:50:01.480 --> 0:50:03.040
<v Speaker 10>that they couldn't. They're just saying that we don't have

0:50:03.120 --> 0:50:04.359
<v Speaker 10>to and we don't have to listen to any core

0:50:04.440 --> 0:50:04.920
<v Speaker 10>that says we do.

0:50:05.239 --> 0:50:08.680
<v Speaker 3>What about on the merits of the Alien Enemies Act yourself?

0:50:08.719 --> 0:50:11.120
<v Speaker 3>You said that they had not ruled on that and

0:50:11.160 --> 0:50:16.239
<v Speaker 3>that these future future people could be able to challenge that.

0:50:16.560 --> 0:50:19.680
<v Speaker 3>What does the landscape look like with respect to that

0:50:20.080 --> 0:50:21.240
<v Speaker 3>as a result of this court.

0:50:21.080 --> 0:50:24.640
<v Speaker 10>Decision, as Crystal laid out, a lot of these people

0:50:24.680 --> 0:50:26.960
<v Speaker 10>have really good factual cases for.

0:50:27.040 --> 0:50:29.200
<v Speaker 7>Not in fact being alien enemies.

0:50:29.480 --> 0:50:33.120
<v Speaker 10>The proclamation declaring the or invoking the Alien Enemies Act

0:50:33.520 --> 0:50:35.200
<v Speaker 10>said that you had to be a member of thrend

0:50:35.200 --> 0:50:38.279
<v Speaker 10>that AHUA. The President actually limited the scope of what

0:50:38.320 --> 0:50:40.359
<v Speaker 10>the proclamation could be if you wanted to and if

0:50:40.400 --> 0:50:43.600
<v Speaker 10>it were a valid invocation, he could target at every

0:50:43.600 --> 0:50:45.600
<v Speaker 10>single even as well and including Green card holders, but

0:50:45.680 --> 0:50:47.840
<v Speaker 10>he limited himself to thn that AWA members. And so

0:50:47.880 --> 0:50:50.719
<v Speaker 10>a lot of these individuals will have good factual cases

0:50:50.880 --> 0:50:54.280
<v Speaker 10>to challenge whether or not they're in fact alien enemies.

0:50:54.400 --> 0:50:57.480
<v Speaker 10>There's an additional legal question, which is is this even

0:50:57.480 --> 0:51:00.439
<v Speaker 10>a valid invocation of the Alien Enemies Act at all?

0:51:00.600 --> 0:51:04.320
<v Speaker 10>Which is, can you consider then that AWA a foreign

0:51:04.320 --> 0:51:07.000
<v Speaker 10>country or if they're not a foreign country, are they

0:51:07.000 --> 0:51:10.520
<v Speaker 10>actually in cahoots with the Venezuelan government, because you need

0:51:10.560 --> 0:51:11.960
<v Speaker 10>that link to a foreign government.

0:51:12.280 --> 0:51:13.600
<v Speaker 7>And then the additional question.

0:51:13.440 --> 0:51:16.120
<v Speaker 10>Of are they invading the United States or are they

0:51:16.120 --> 0:51:18.120
<v Speaker 10>threatening to invade the United States, or are they having

0:51:18.120 --> 0:51:20.480
<v Speaker 10>a physical incursion into the United States. And so there

0:51:20.480 --> 0:51:23.160
<v Speaker 10>are two kind of substantive merits legal questions, which are

0:51:23.440 --> 0:51:26.960
<v Speaker 10>the fundamentals of the proclamation itself related to whether this

0:51:27.040 --> 0:51:29.520
<v Speaker 10>is all fake and obviously it's all fake. There's no

0:51:29.600 --> 0:51:32.759
<v Speaker 10>actual physical invasion into the territory of the United States.

0:51:32.760 --> 0:51:33.480
<v Speaker 7>By then that ahwa.

0:51:34.000 --> 0:51:37.040
<v Speaker 10>And then there's the related question of are the people

0:51:37.120 --> 0:51:41.640
<v Speaker 10>actually designated, assuming the proclamation is valid, actually alien enemies

0:51:41.840 --> 0:51:44.480
<v Speaker 10>and the sort of the reporting that Crystal pointed to,

0:51:44.680 --> 0:51:46.239
<v Speaker 10>it seems that many of them are not. You know,

0:51:46.280 --> 0:51:48.520
<v Speaker 10>there's someone with a they were just picked up because

0:51:48.520 --> 0:51:51.040
<v Speaker 10>of their tattoos, someone with a tattoo for their autistic brother,

0:51:51.360 --> 0:51:53.760
<v Speaker 10>some of the tattoo. You know, who's a gay barber

0:51:53.760 --> 0:51:57.200
<v Speaker 10>who obviously is not a member of the by all reporting.

0:51:57.239 --> 0:52:00.200
<v Speaker 10>And so those are merits determinations that are now going

0:52:00.239 --> 0:52:02.920
<v Speaker 10>to be made much harder because they have to be individualized.

0:52:03.320 --> 0:52:06.200
<v Speaker 10>There's not kind of a broad class action challenge, and

0:52:06.239 --> 0:52:08.759
<v Speaker 10>so they've made it more difficult, but hopefully.

0:52:08.400 --> 0:52:11.839
<v Speaker 2>So even that determination on the whether or not the

0:52:11.880 --> 0:52:15.160
<v Speaker 2>invocation of the Alien Enemies Act itself that has to

0:52:15.239 --> 0:52:18.360
<v Speaker 2>start on an individual basis with these habeas petitions.

0:52:18.400 --> 0:52:20.000
<v Speaker 6>Is that what I'm hearing you to say.

0:52:20.280 --> 0:52:24.279
<v Speaker 10>So if a court, like an appellate court, held that

0:52:24.320 --> 0:52:29.160
<v Speaker 10>the invocation or proclamation was invalid people, and they had

0:52:29.200 --> 0:52:32.520
<v Speaker 10>like direct appellent overview of whatever court system that were

0:52:32.600 --> 0:52:35.400
<v Speaker 10>most like the Fifth Circuit, it would have presidential effect

0:52:35.800 --> 0:52:38.279
<v Speaker 10>and the effect would be that more courts would deny

0:52:38.280 --> 0:52:40.759
<v Speaker 10>the validity of the proclamation. One of the problems with

0:52:40.800 --> 0:52:43.040
<v Speaker 10>doing all these individualized petitions that you could start to

0:52:43.080 --> 0:52:46.040
<v Speaker 10>see divergent case law or something like that. So the

0:52:46.160 --> 0:52:48.200
<v Speaker 10>end result might be that this might all be funneled

0:52:48.200 --> 0:52:50.360
<v Speaker 10>into one on the actual proclamation itself.

0:52:50.480 --> 0:52:54.000
<v Speaker 7>Gotcha, But it would have to start there. It couldn't

0:52:54.080 --> 0:52:55.959
<v Speaker 7>start with this like kind of large case.

0:52:56.080 --> 0:52:56.400
<v Speaker 6>Gotcha.

0:52:56.560 --> 0:52:58.160
<v Speaker 2>And my last question for you is a piece go.

0:52:58.239 --> 0:52:59.840
<v Speaker 2>I watched some of your stream last night, which was

0:52:59.920 --> 0:53:03.320
<v Speaker 2>very helpful, by the way, and everybody should go subscribe

0:53:03.360 --> 0:53:06.480
<v Speaker 2>to Pisco's Hour, which I've you know, really been enjoying

0:53:06.480 --> 0:53:09.000
<v Speaker 2>glad to see that your growth over there. But you

0:53:09.120 --> 0:53:12.200
<v Speaker 2>mentioned that you thought Roberts might be kind of playing

0:53:12.200 --> 0:53:15.600
<v Speaker 2>politics here, like thinking, OK, I'm going to give the

0:53:15.640 --> 0:53:20.560
<v Speaker 2>administration some w's here, so maybe I build some credibility

0:53:20.760 --> 0:53:23.359
<v Speaker 2>so later on if we have to give him some ls,

0:53:23.440 --> 0:53:26.480
<v Speaker 2>that'll have more you know, purchase, because we gave them

0:53:26.520 --> 0:53:29.439
<v Speaker 2>things that they wanted earlier on. I've also been thinking

0:53:29.480 --> 0:53:31.560
<v Speaker 2>about the fact, I mean, this is an administration that

0:53:31.680 --> 0:53:35.080
<v Speaker 2>is at least playing with outright defiance of court orders.

0:53:35.320 --> 0:53:37.759
<v Speaker 2>And so if you're the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court,

0:53:38.040 --> 0:53:41.080
<v Speaker 2>you want your institutions still to matter. So maybe you're

0:53:41.120 --> 0:53:44.600
<v Speaker 2>thinking about, like, I really should go along with as

0:53:44.680 --> 0:53:48.000
<v Speaker 2>much as I can so that I don't end up

0:53:48.000 --> 0:53:51.200
<v Speaker 2>in a situation where he does blatantly defy a court

0:53:51.320 --> 0:53:54.600
<v Speaker 2>order and then all of our purported power is just done,

0:53:54.680 --> 0:53:58.759
<v Speaker 2>it's over. So what are you thinking? What is your

0:53:58.800 --> 0:54:01.440
<v Speaker 2>analysis in that regard? And one last note which I

0:54:01.480 --> 0:54:03.640
<v Speaker 2>also thought was interesting. Conservats were very upset about the

0:54:03.680 --> 0:54:06.880
<v Speaker 2>fact Amy Cony Barrett actually joined the Liberals on the descent,

0:54:06.920 --> 0:54:09.719
<v Speaker 2>which was also noteworthy here. And also there was a

0:54:09.760 --> 0:54:12.040
<v Speaker 2>lot of gender dynamics that play there, since you had

0:54:12.040 --> 0:54:14.160
<v Speaker 2>all the women on one side and all the men

0:54:14.360 --> 0:54:16.520
<v Speaker 2>on the other side. But in case if you could

0:54:16.719 --> 0:54:18.920
<v Speaker 2>lay on your analysis of what you think might be

0:54:18.960 --> 0:54:21.200
<v Speaker 2>going on with some of the John Roberts politics here.

0:54:22.080 --> 0:54:24.520
<v Speaker 10>Yeah, I get that impression, because, first of all, there's

0:54:24.520 --> 0:54:28.160
<v Speaker 10>inside reporting that Roberts is concerned about the legitimacy of

0:54:28.160 --> 0:54:30.640
<v Speaker 10>the court, and so there's direct reporting talking to that

0:54:30.640 --> 0:54:33.239
<v Speaker 10>that's a state of mind. He released that statement about

0:54:33.320 --> 0:54:36.600
<v Speaker 10>Judge Boseberg, who issued the opinion the District Court, and

0:54:36.920 --> 0:54:39.920
<v Speaker 10>that how do you interpret that other than sort of

0:54:39.960 --> 0:54:43.239
<v Speaker 10>a signaling political act. And so the fact that he's saying, hey,

0:54:43.280 --> 0:54:46.320
<v Speaker 10>we shouldn't impeach this judge. The proper course to complain

0:54:46.680 --> 0:54:49.440
<v Speaker 10>about overreach by the court and about whether or not

0:54:49.480 --> 0:54:51.359
<v Speaker 10>you're defining orders is to repeal. And by the way,

0:54:51.520 --> 0:54:55.480
<v Speaker 10>the defining orders portion of this is very much still

0:54:55.480 --> 0:54:58.920
<v Speaker 10>at play. Just because the order was ultimately deemed invalid

0:54:58.920 --> 0:55:01.120
<v Speaker 10>because there was no jurisdiction and doesn't mean that you

0:55:01.120 --> 0:55:03.360
<v Speaker 10>still don't have an obligation to follow that order, but

0:55:04.360 --> 0:55:07.160
<v Speaker 10>that it was inherently sort of a political signaling act

0:55:07.320 --> 0:55:08.839
<v Speaker 10>to defend the legitimacy of the court.

0:55:09.120 --> 0:55:12.080
<v Speaker 7>And so I see Judge Roberts.

0:55:11.680 --> 0:55:14.000
<v Speaker 10>As very much concerned about that based on reporting, based

0:55:14.080 --> 0:55:17.520
<v Speaker 10>upon his statements, and based upon these decisions, And the

0:55:17.560 --> 0:55:19.239
<v Speaker 10>same thing with Trump versus the United States, where they're

0:55:19.239 --> 0:55:21.279
<v Speaker 10>always trying to split the baby have a kind of

0:55:21.320 --> 0:55:24.359
<v Speaker 10>middle ground approach which is not giving a full win

0:55:24.480 --> 0:55:27.840
<v Speaker 10>to Trump and where the opinion seems completely untailored to

0:55:27.880 --> 0:55:31.280
<v Speaker 10>precedent and completely like preposterous in view of the actual

0:55:31.320 --> 0:55:33.759
<v Speaker 10>real world. Think about the Trump the United States case,

0:55:33.760 --> 0:55:36.680
<v Speaker 10>where he's really putting blinders on and not realizing that

0:55:36.960 --> 0:55:39.799
<v Speaker 10>justice delayed, you know, is justice denied with respect to

0:55:39.840 --> 0:55:43.000
<v Speaker 10>what happened in the January sixth cases. So that seems

0:55:43.000 --> 0:55:45.440
<v Speaker 10>to be his approach from what I can gather in

0:55:45.440 --> 0:55:47.560
<v Speaker 10>my intuition about it and based on the reporting that

0:55:47.600 --> 0:55:50.280
<v Speaker 10>we're seeing. And I think it's a dangerous game because

0:55:50.400 --> 0:55:54.160
<v Speaker 10>these Trump you know, sick of fans, the administration officials

0:55:54.320 --> 0:55:56.279
<v Speaker 10>are not going to be loyal to you or not

0:55:56.280 --> 0:55:58.520
<v Speaker 10>going to respect you anymore, just because you've issued a

0:55:58.560 --> 0:56:00.680
<v Speaker 10>couple of middle ground decisions.

0:56:00.840 --> 0:56:02.600
<v Speaker 7>And I think it's one that he's walking.

0:56:02.719 --> 0:56:03.920
<v Speaker 10>It's also one of the reasons why I think you

0:56:03.920 --> 0:56:06.279
<v Speaker 10>couldn't you shouldn't read into too much of the administrative

0:56:06.320 --> 0:56:10.360
<v Speaker 10>stay into the mister Barreirogarcia case, because in that situation,

0:56:10.840 --> 0:56:12.680
<v Speaker 10>I feel like one of the reasons why he might

0:56:12.760 --> 0:56:15.560
<v Speaker 10>issue an administrative stay is to if you were going

0:56:15.600 --> 0:56:18.160
<v Speaker 10>to rule on the right side, in my opinion, you know,

0:56:18.320 --> 0:56:21.000
<v Speaker 10>trying to get mister Bererogracia back would be to gather

0:56:21.080 --> 0:56:24.279
<v Speaker 10>a consensus to actually have an opinion. If there's going

0:56:24.360 --> 0:56:25.840
<v Speaker 10>to have to be a standoff between the courts and

0:56:25.880 --> 0:56:28.000
<v Speaker 10>the President, have it be with the Supreme Court as

0:56:28.000 --> 0:56:30.000
<v Speaker 10>opposed to the Fourth Circuit. And so I very much

0:56:30.040 --> 0:56:31.920
<v Speaker 10>see him in the game of trying to protect the

0:56:32.520 --> 0:56:34.160
<v Speaker 10>legitimacy of the court and the institution.

0:56:34.239 --> 0:56:35.479
<v Speaker 7>But I just think that he's off the mark.

0:56:35.840 --> 0:56:38.719
<v Speaker 2>I do have one last, sorry legal question for you.

0:56:38.880 --> 0:56:39.399
<v Speaker 6>Piece goes.

0:56:39.520 --> 0:56:41.920
<v Speaker 2>There was a question of whether or not the administration

0:56:42.040 --> 0:56:44.520
<v Speaker 2>did defy court orders with regard to you know, the

0:56:44.600 --> 0:56:46.480
<v Speaker 2>judge had said, even if you have to turn the

0:56:46.480 --> 0:56:48.879
<v Speaker 2>planes around, this cannot go forward. They did not turn

0:56:48.920 --> 0:56:50.640
<v Speaker 2>the planes around. They say the planes were gone, so

0:56:50.680 --> 0:56:52.440
<v Speaker 2>we couldn't do anything, or we didn't want to do anything, we.

0:56:52.440 --> 0:56:53.320
<v Speaker 6>Didn't have to do anything.

0:56:53.680 --> 0:56:57.399
<v Speaker 2>And there were hearings continuing to determine whether they should

0:56:57.400 --> 0:57:00.479
<v Speaker 2>be held in contempt for defiance of those orders. Wipe

0:57:00.480 --> 0:57:03.120
<v Speaker 2>that out? Is that still ongoing? Like, are where do

0:57:03.160 --> 0:57:03.879
<v Speaker 2>we go from here?

0:57:04.719 --> 0:57:04.879
<v Speaker 7>Yeah?

0:57:04.960 --> 0:57:07.800
<v Speaker 10>No, you're supposed to follow court orders, even if ultimately

0:57:08.080 --> 0:57:10.440
<v Speaker 10>it's determined that the court does not. It was not

0:57:10.560 --> 0:57:12.319
<v Speaker 10>right in the initial instance to issue the order. And

0:57:12.320 --> 0:57:14.719
<v Speaker 10>that's very much, by the way true. The holding of

0:57:14.719 --> 0:57:17.920
<v Speaker 10>this court is that Boseberg did not have the jurisdiction,

0:57:18.120 --> 0:57:20.320
<v Speaker 10>did not have the right venue to issue these orders.

0:57:20.440 --> 0:57:22.200
<v Speaker 10>But that doesn't mean that you're not still obligated to

0:57:22.240 --> 0:57:25.760
<v Speaker 10>follow that order. And so this does not eliminate the

0:57:25.920 --> 0:57:29.480
<v Speaker 10>contempt proceedings and the hearings that are occurring before Bosburg

0:57:29.520 --> 0:57:31.919
<v Speaker 10>about whether or not in fact they violated the order.

0:57:32.120 --> 0:57:35.600
<v Speaker 10>To me, it's completely obvious that they violated the order.

0:57:35.680 --> 0:57:37.760
<v Speaker 10>I mean, they're all but bragging about it. And if

0:57:37.800 --> 0:57:39.800
<v Speaker 10>you look at the timeline about when the order was given,

0:57:40.000 --> 0:57:43.200
<v Speaker 10>it was an oral order. But there's nothing less binding

0:57:43.240 --> 0:57:46.920
<v Speaker 10>about an oral order. They're completely aware about the existence

0:57:46.960 --> 0:57:50.439
<v Speaker 10>of the order. Boseburg is like talking and asking who

0:57:50.920 --> 0:57:53.600
<v Speaker 10>even up to like individual lawyers, was aware of what's

0:57:53.640 --> 0:57:55.400
<v Speaker 10>going on, and so he's doing some fact finding there.

0:57:55.440 --> 0:57:56.320
<v Speaker 7>But they knew about it.

0:57:56.360 --> 0:57:58.200
<v Speaker 10>They knew they were supposed to turn the planes around,

0:57:58.320 --> 0:58:01.520
<v Speaker 10>and it's preposterous the notion that courts could not order

0:58:01.560 --> 0:58:04.120
<v Speaker 10>a plane to turn around if it had, for example,

0:58:04.240 --> 0:58:06.800
<v Speaker 10>US citizens on board and they were trying to abscond illegally.

0:58:06.920 --> 0:58:08.200
<v Speaker 10>Which is also one of the reasons why all these

0:58:08.240 --> 0:58:10.720
<v Speaker 10>decisions are very problematic, is because they apply at their

0:58:10.720 --> 0:58:13.760
<v Speaker 10>maximum also to US citizens that they couldn't, you know,

0:58:13.920 --> 0:58:14.520
<v Speaker 10>give that order.

0:58:14.560 --> 0:58:15.640
<v Speaker 7>The order wasn't valid.

0:58:15.800 --> 0:58:17.480
<v Speaker 10>And at this point, you know, they're not even trying

0:58:17.520 --> 0:58:21.360
<v Speaker 10>to hide their defiance. They're invoking the state secret doctrine

0:58:21.360 --> 0:58:24.160
<v Speaker 10>when they're blatantly like posting the times of when it

0:58:24.240 --> 0:58:26.960
<v Speaker 10>landed and where the President of El Salvador is like

0:58:27.080 --> 0:58:30.720
<v Speaker 10>meaning over the orders and flouting them. And so to me,

0:58:30.800 --> 0:58:32.760
<v Speaker 10>there's not no question really about the defiance and the

0:58:32.760 --> 0:58:35.920
<v Speaker 10>descent all but accuses them of flagrant disrespect for the

0:58:35.960 --> 0:58:37.439
<v Speaker 10>rule of law and the judge's order.

0:58:38.040 --> 0:58:40.960
<v Speaker 3>Will we see a resolution of that at the court

0:58:41.080 --> 0:58:43.200
<v Speaker 3>or is that a Boseberg contempt?

0:58:44.040 --> 0:58:46.560
<v Speaker 1>Like would it stay within his jurisdiction?

0:58:48.080 --> 0:58:51.000
<v Speaker 10>It could definitely be appealable, and I expect this administration

0:58:51.040 --> 0:58:53.240
<v Speaker 10>appeals everything, and so I would always expect them to

0:58:53.320 --> 0:58:56.400
<v Speaker 10>appeal it. They're supposed to give deference to the factual

0:58:56.440 --> 0:58:58.760
<v Speaker 10>findings of the lower court. That's one of the principles here.

0:58:58.920 --> 0:59:01.560
<v Speaker 10>But you know, they're also not supposed to appeal tros.

0:59:01.800 --> 0:59:05.280
<v Speaker 10>And there's not supposed to be jurisdiction to the Supreme

0:59:05.320 --> 0:59:07.400
<v Speaker 10>Court for any appellate court to hear a kind of

0:59:07.440 --> 0:59:10.040
<v Speaker 10>disagreement on a TRO. But there's always seems to be

0:59:10.080 --> 0:59:12.960
<v Speaker 10>special rules when the president's evolved, special rules when Trump

0:59:13.000 --> 0:59:15.280
<v Speaker 10>is involved, And so I don't know if they're going

0:59:15.320 --> 0:59:18.000
<v Speaker 10>to pay deference to Judge both Boseburg's findings, and I

0:59:18.120 --> 0:59:20.800
<v Speaker 10>very much expect them to appeal the order and for

0:59:20.840 --> 0:59:23.680
<v Speaker 10>them to say that it's invalid if if he finds,

0:59:23.720 --> 0:59:26.040
<v Speaker 10>for example, that they violated the court order, to say

0:59:26.040 --> 0:59:28.600
<v Speaker 10>that that finding is not applicable as to the president,

0:59:28.880 --> 0:59:30.960
<v Speaker 10>I don't think the President himself is involved, but as

0:59:31.000 --> 0:59:33.840
<v Speaker 10>to the other officials, and so yeah, I don't think

0:59:33.880 --> 0:59:36.280
<v Speaker 10>it'll be finally resolved in the district court, even though

0:59:36.280 --> 0:59:38.480
<v Speaker 10>they're supposed to pay deference to those factual findings.

0:59:38.480 --> 0:59:38.880
<v Speaker 1>I don't know.

0:59:39.160 --> 0:59:42.520
<v Speaker 2>All right, Well, this has been very illuminating. Thank you

0:59:42.560 --> 0:59:44.400
<v Speaker 2>so much for taking some time to break these issues

0:59:44.400 --> 0:59:44.800
<v Speaker 2>down for us.

0:59:44.800 --> 0:59:45.120
<v Speaker 6>Peace go.

0:59:45.120 --> 0:59:47.400
<v Speaker 3>Great to see you, thanks man, Thanks so much, guys, Yeah,

0:59:47.520 --> 0:59:50.040
<v Speaker 3>appreciate Thank you guys so much for watching. We appreciate it.

0:59:50.080 --> 0:59:52.240
<v Speaker 3>Great counterpoint show for everybody tomorrow. We will see you

0:59:52.280 --> 0:59:52.840
<v Speaker 3>all later.