WEBVTT - Beating The Book: 2019 NFL MegaPod Week 12 Preview

0:00:03.400 --> 0:00:12.640
<v Speaker 1>Check it down man now down Now Thursday morning, November

0:00:13.000 --> 0:00:16.640
<v Speaker 1>one up Beating the Book podcast. It's Gil Alexander, it

0:00:16.760 --> 0:00:20.959
<v Speaker 1>is the megapod. Very excited back in the saddle, glad

0:00:20.960 --> 0:00:22.919
<v Speaker 1>to be alive. Uh. And it's always on the show.

0:00:23.120 --> 0:00:24.800
<v Speaker 1>And I'll introduce them all at once because they've been

0:00:24.800 --> 0:00:26.720
<v Speaker 1>so good filling in on a numbers game on Visa

0:00:26.800 --> 0:00:30.920
<v Speaker 1>for me. Mike Palm, Todd, Wishnev and also a rotating guest.

0:00:30.960 --> 0:00:33.400
<v Speaker 1>Today happens to be producing number five, Jeff Parlay. So

0:00:33.479 --> 0:00:38.280
<v Speaker 1>hello to everybody. Mike, thank you for raining Todd in

0:00:38.400 --> 0:00:41.280
<v Speaker 1>the last three days. I'm not sure I've been successful

0:00:41.320 --> 0:00:44.199
<v Speaker 1>at it, although I did make an effort well, and

0:00:44.320 --> 0:00:46.640
<v Speaker 1>effort is all is all you we can really ask for.

0:00:46.720 --> 0:00:49.520
<v Speaker 1>You guys were honestly, you guys were great. You were wonderful.

0:00:49.800 --> 0:00:51.120
<v Speaker 1>I listened to as much of it as I can,

0:00:51.120 --> 0:00:54.000
<v Speaker 1>but the reviews on Twitter seemed to be all spectacular.

0:00:54.080 --> 0:00:57.440
<v Speaker 1>It's important component of Todd being rained in Gil and

0:00:57.520 --> 0:00:59.800
<v Speaker 1>you you know this from experiences. His lack of show

0:01:00.280 --> 0:01:04.080
<v Speaker 1>sort of brains himself in lack of show prep. Uh.

0:01:04.160 --> 0:01:07.840
<v Speaker 1>The willingness, the willingness and almost happy to use the

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:11.440
<v Speaker 1>show as a vehicle to get people to research for him. Todd,

0:01:11.440 --> 0:01:14.000
<v Speaker 1>what am I missing? Look? I like crowdsourcing. I don't

0:01:14.000 --> 0:01:16.880
<v Speaker 1>think there's anything wrong with that. And uh, I don't

0:01:16.880 --> 0:01:19.160
<v Speaker 1>think there's anybody just more show prep than me When

0:01:19.200 --> 0:01:21.520
<v Speaker 1>I watch eight billion games. Mike just likes to take

0:01:21.560 --> 0:01:24.480
<v Speaker 1>snarky comments at me, snarky shots at me. You know,

0:01:24.560 --> 0:01:27.000
<v Speaker 1>it's unbelievable. Now the question is is will you have

0:01:27.040 --> 0:01:28.800
<v Speaker 1>a show when you come back on Monday? Because he

0:01:28.880 --> 0:01:31.480
<v Speaker 1>did fourteen hours of NHL this morning. That was an

0:01:31.480 --> 0:01:33.520
<v Speaker 1>interesting program my choice, But that's wonderful. You guys had

0:01:33.520 --> 0:01:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Matthew Barnaby on, so that's nothing wrong. That's a great guest, right,

0:01:36.600 --> 0:01:39.440
<v Speaker 1>Matthew Bonnaby. A lot of people thought it was great. Gil.

0:01:40.000 --> 0:01:43.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, Todd thinks it was excessive because he doesn't

0:01:43.360 --> 0:01:46.240
<v Speaker 1>know anything about the NHL and he didn't participate in

0:01:46.319 --> 0:01:49.400
<v Speaker 1>any of the three segments. But that's not true. What

0:01:49.520 --> 0:01:52.120
<v Speaker 1>about my question about the five overtime game that that

0:01:52.160 --> 0:01:54.920
<v Speaker 1>was that was great? If somebody posts the number on

0:01:54.960 --> 0:01:57.040
<v Speaker 1>that game twenty years later, you get that on him.

0:02:00.160 --> 0:02:03.720
<v Speaker 1>What about Mike Babcock not being the coach anymore? Uh?

0:02:03.720 --> 0:02:06.080
<v Speaker 1>Within you talking about with that can we do anything

0:02:06.080 --> 0:02:11.600
<v Speaker 1>about that number? Mike. That's fascinating listening. Okay, Todd, Well,

0:02:11.639 --> 0:02:14.079
<v Speaker 1>I'm glad you guys, relationship has been repaired over these

0:02:14.120 --> 0:02:17.240
<v Speaker 1>last three days. I'm glad it's moving forward. The the

0:02:17.320 --> 0:02:19.239
<v Speaker 1>Kevin Harlan like laugh that you hear is that of

0:02:19.320 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>jeff Parlay. What's happening in Jeffrey, Gil, it's a it's

0:02:22.440 --> 0:02:24.800
<v Speaker 1>a pleasure to hear you again. Uh. I will also

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:27.239
<v Speaker 1>say Todd and Mike have done a tremendous job and

0:02:27.800 --> 0:02:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Jacob Broach has done a tremendous job in my place

0:02:30.600 --> 0:02:32.600
<v Speaker 1>behind the glass on the numbers game to the last

0:02:32.600 --> 0:02:35.560
<v Speaker 1>few days. Well, all of us will be back in

0:02:35.600 --> 0:02:37.880
<v Speaker 1>the saddle sooner rather than later, which is good. Todd

0:02:37.960 --> 0:02:40.080
<v Speaker 1>put Jacob in a really good light at the end

0:02:40.120 --> 0:02:44.600
<v Speaker 1>of the end of Wednesday's program. Here we go. Okay,

0:02:45.120 --> 0:02:48.280
<v Speaker 1>the South Border kicker, m four Fiegal, Jacob, what do

0:02:48.320 --> 0:02:51.520
<v Speaker 1>you think about that? That's not what I said those

0:02:51.639 --> 0:02:56.519
<v Speaker 1>Jackson game. Okay, oh my god. We're all doing the

0:02:56.560 --> 0:02:59.840
<v Speaker 1>show tomorrow together, so I appreciate that you should hear

0:02:59.880 --> 0:03:01.840
<v Speaker 1>my when he finishes up the segment, Gil, you know

0:03:01.880 --> 0:03:05.040
<v Speaker 1>how like, yeah, I really appreciate your you doing the

0:03:05.040 --> 0:03:07.640
<v Speaker 1>show now, because that's so smooth. How you go in

0:03:07.680 --> 0:03:09.760
<v Speaker 1>and out of the commercials and you go in and

0:03:09.800 --> 0:03:11.680
<v Speaker 1>out of the segments where you have to do the reads.

0:03:11.919 --> 0:03:14.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you're just a consummate professional. Mike finishes up

0:03:14.919 --> 0:03:17.119
<v Speaker 1>the second with JVT on the NBA and he goes,

0:03:17.760 --> 0:03:23.240
<v Speaker 1>good hit Jonathan, just like rolls, I heard you. I

0:03:23.240 --> 0:03:25.040
<v Speaker 1>will thank you for that. I heard you did end

0:03:25.200 --> 0:03:28.400
<v Speaker 1>one segment with thank you? Was that correct? Well, I look,

0:03:28.520 --> 0:03:31.200
<v Speaker 1>I was thrown to the wolves. I didn't know about

0:03:31.240 --> 0:03:33.400
<v Speaker 1>this whole doing it myself. You know, I have to

0:03:33.400 --> 0:03:36.240
<v Speaker 1>give you a lot more credit. You and Colin Cowherd

0:03:36.280 --> 0:03:39.760
<v Speaker 1>do your own show. It's it's it's fantastic. Well, thank

0:03:39.760 --> 0:03:43.800
<v Speaker 1>you thoughts very nice. Maybe I appreciate it, but I

0:03:43.800 --> 0:03:46.200
<v Speaker 1>appreciate you guys doing it, and thank you for doing it. Tomorrow,

0:03:46.480 --> 0:03:48.280
<v Speaker 1>you guys will have to sit through this twice, so

0:03:48.320 --> 0:03:50.960
<v Speaker 1>I apologize for it. So we'll act tomorrow like you're

0:03:51.000 --> 0:03:53.200
<v Speaker 1>hearing it for the first time. Maybe, but the reason

0:03:53.280 --> 0:03:56.320
<v Speaker 1>that guessing lines was late on this podcast feed and

0:03:56.320 --> 0:03:58.640
<v Speaker 1>the reason that I wasn't on in numbers game, I

0:03:58.640 --> 0:04:02.160
<v Speaker 1>think most are aware that, um, I ruptured my achilles

0:04:02.160 --> 0:04:04.240
<v Speaker 1>tenant for the second time, not not the same one.

0:04:04.360 --> 0:04:06.840
<v Speaker 1>I ruptured one of them twenty three years ago. You

0:04:06.880 --> 0:04:09.080
<v Speaker 1>kind of live in fear. Once one ruptures, that the

0:04:09.080 --> 0:04:11.880
<v Speaker 1>other world rupture. And so finally it happened when I

0:04:11.880 --> 0:04:15.000
<v Speaker 1>played Todd and Tennis. Mike Palm was there about seventeen

0:04:15.080 --> 0:04:19.120
<v Speaker 1>days ago, now actually sixteen days ago. I ruptured the

0:04:19.120 --> 0:04:23.039
<v Speaker 1>achilles then, and you know, okay, I went in, I

0:04:23.080 --> 0:04:25.680
<v Speaker 1>did uh a numbers game. I did the podcast with

0:04:25.720 --> 0:04:27.800
<v Speaker 1>a freshly ruptured achilles. The only day I missed really

0:04:27.880 --> 0:04:31.400
<v Speaker 1>was the day of surgery, and then after that came

0:04:31.440 --> 0:04:34.839
<v Speaker 1>in with the you know, newly repaired achilles. And last

0:04:34.920 --> 0:04:38.400
<v Speaker 1>week during the show, if you were really a keen listener,

0:04:38.440 --> 0:04:40.360
<v Speaker 1>and I don't know that anybody could have figured this out,

0:04:40.960 --> 0:04:44.080
<v Speaker 1>but during first segments of a numbers game, I would

0:04:44.120 --> 0:04:47.159
<v Speaker 1>start to lose my breath. And because I was using

0:04:47.200 --> 0:04:49.600
<v Speaker 1>a scooter. So after this surgery, after the first one

0:04:49.640 --> 0:04:51.320
<v Speaker 1>when I was a young guy, that gave me crutches

0:04:51.680 --> 0:04:54.000
<v Speaker 1>and so I was, you know, going all around San Francisco.

0:04:54.000 --> 0:04:55.599
<v Speaker 1>You're in your twenties, You're like, I get out of

0:04:55.640 --> 0:04:58.400
<v Speaker 1>my way. I'm strong, and this time I was like, oh,

0:04:58.400 --> 0:04:59.720
<v Speaker 1>I'll take the crutches, and they were like, no, you

0:04:59.760 --> 0:05:02.880
<v Speaker 1>should really take this scooter, and so I was like, Okay,

0:05:02.920 --> 0:05:04.680
<v Speaker 1>I'll take the scooter. So I'm scooting all around the

0:05:04.680 --> 0:05:07.039
<v Speaker 1>South Point and we just sort of chalked it up

0:05:07.040 --> 0:05:08.719
<v Speaker 1>because it was only the first segment, and Mike, you

0:05:08.760 --> 0:05:10.600
<v Speaker 1>even noticed it one day when you were in with

0:05:10.640 --> 0:05:12.760
<v Speaker 1>me that you know, it was just, oh, it's the

0:05:12.800 --> 0:05:15.000
<v Speaker 1>cardio of going up the ramp, jumping in the chair,

0:05:15.120 --> 0:05:19.159
<v Speaker 1>all this kind of stuff. So you know, it happened

0:05:19.320 --> 0:05:21.679
<v Speaker 1>several times last week, and then on Friday it happened

0:05:21.680 --> 0:05:24.159
<v Speaker 1>in a Miles Garrett segment late in the show after

0:05:24.200 --> 0:05:26.000
<v Speaker 1>Alan Boston was on, and that was a little weird,

0:05:26.040 --> 0:05:28.200
<v Speaker 1>but Parlay sort of said, hey, it was really the

0:05:28.200 --> 0:05:30.320
<v Speaker 1>first segment. You talked a lot, so maybe that was it.

0:05:31.240 --> 0:05:33.720
<v Speaker 1>So anyway, long story short, if that's even possible. Now,

0:05:33.880 --> 0:05:36.479
<v Speaker 1>Monday of this week, I'm doing guessing lines with Chrissy,

0:05:36.560 --> 0:05:39.000
<v Speaker 1>and as people know, I do a lot of the talking.

0:05:39.040 --> 0:05:40.880
<v Speaker 1>Chrissy does a lot of talking. It's basically each of

0:05:40.960 --> 0:05:44.280
<v Speaker 1>us talking for an hour. And I noticed that every

0:05:44.320 --> 0:05:47.440
<v Speaker 1>single segment I lost my voice, like I was gasping

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:48.800
<v Speaker 1>for air, and I would have to throw it to

0:05:48.880 --> 0:05:51.920
<v Speaker 1>Parlay or to Chrissy prematurely, and if you go back

0:05:51.920 --> 0:05:53.800
<v Speaker 1>to guessing lines, maybe you'll be able to hear it.

0:05:54.000 --> 0:05:56.040
<v Speaker 1>But after the show, I come and I have to

0:05:56.240 --> 0:06:00.480
<v Speaker 1>for the podcast, I have to record a sixty second intro,

0:06:00.640 --> 0:06:02.920
<v Speaker 1>not a sixty second intro, but an intro for the show,

0:06:02.960 --> 0:06:05.040
<v Speaker 1>and then a sponsor read. And there's something about having

0:06:05.080 --> 0:06:06.640
<v Speaker 1>the software in front of me where I could actually

0:06:06.680 --> 0:06:08.159
<v Speaker 1>see the time. I have the time in the studio

0:06:08.200 --> 0:06:10.440
<v Speaker 1>too on the radio show, but I don't really pay

0:06:10.440 --> 0:06:14.320
<v Speaker 1>attention as much. But at home alone with the timer,

0:06:14.800 --> 0:06:16.679
<v Speaker 1>I could sense that I could only get through thirty

0:06:16.760 --> 0:06:19.800
<v Speaker 1>seconds without having to gasp for breath. And at that

0:06:19.839 --> 0:06:21.960
<v Speaker 1>point that was sort of the trigger for me that

0:06:22.120 --> 0:06:24.920
<v Speaker 1>something was terribly wrong. And so my brother happens to

0:06:24.960 --> 0:06:27.640
<v Speaker 1>be a doctor. I texted him and I said, hey, look,

0:06:27.680 --> 0:06:32.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm short of breath. What do you think? And he said,

0:06:32.640 --> 0:06:35.560
<v Speaker 1>you just had surgery, you're not as young as you

0:06:35.640 --> 0:06:38.920
<v Speaker 1>used to be, and you're a fatass. So he threw

0:06:38.960 --> 0:06:40.400
<v Speaker 1>that in, By the way, has nothing to do with anything,

0:06:40.400 --> 0:06:41.599
<v Speaker 1>but he just wanted to take a shot at me.

0:06:42.000 --> 0:06:44.400
<v Speaker 1>You could have a blood clot from your surgery that's

0:06:44.440 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 1>gone to your lungs. Go to the e R immediately,

0:06:48.000 --> 0:06:50.479
<v Speaker 1>So I did, and so I scooted in with my

0:06:50.480 --> 0:06:54.080
<v Speaker 1>scooter to the e R very quickly after a cat scan.

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:56.000
<v Speaker 1>And I'm losing my breath right now talking because they

0:06:56.000 --> 0:06:57.560
<v Speaker 1>didn't get all of this, but you'll understand what I'm

0:06:57.560 --> 0:07:01.240
<v Speaker 1>talking about. Momentarily, they recognized that I had a massive

0:07:01.600 --> 0:07:06.160
<v Speaker 1>pulmonary embolism. A blood clot because of my surgery had

0:07:06.200 --> 0:07:09.080
<v Speaker 1>gone up my leg in a ten day span and

0:07:09.160 --> 0:07:11.800
<v Speaker 1>had lodged right at the top of my lungs where

0:07:11.800 --> 0:07:14.680
<v Speaker 1>it attaches to the heart, so my heart was being

0:07:14.680 --> 0:07:18.360
<v Speaker 1>pressured too. So essentially what they did is they immediately

0:07:18.920 --> 0:07:21.120
<v Speaker 1>that night were like, first of all, They're like, we

0:07:21.160 --> 0:07:22.600
<v Speaker 1>gotta hand it to you. We don't see people come

0:07:22.640 --> 0:07:26.000
<v Speaker 1>into the hospital on a scooter, just willy nilly on

0:07:26.040 --> 0:07:28.800
<v Speaker 1>a on a with a pulmonary embolism. That said, we

0:07:28.840 --> 0:07:30.720
<v Speaker 1>need to give you a thromb beck to me immediately.

0:07:31.480 --> 0:07:34.920
<v Speaker 1>So they basically went into my femural vein and shot

0:07:35.000 --> 0:07:38.680
<v Speaker 1>up through there to attack my blood clot, and they

0:07:38.680 --> 0:07:40.800
<v Speaker 1>were able to They can't really remove it, but they

0:07:40.840 --> 0:07:43.360
<v Speaker 1>were able to get about half of it, and so

0:07:43.400 --> 0:07:46.560
<v Speaker 1>it saved my life. Period. I you know, you could

0:07:46.560 --> 0:07:50.040
<v Speaker 1>have died. Um. Serena Williams had this inn when she

0:07:50.080 --> 0:07:53.000
<v Speaker 1>was wearing sandals in a restaurant. She stepped on glass

0:07:53.920 --> 0:07:56.240
<v Speaker 1>and she needed foot surgery. She ended up having a

0:07:56.280 --> 0:07:58.280
<v Speaker 1>pulmonary embolism. I don't know if people remember that, if

0:07:58.280 --> 0:08:01.200
<v Speaker 1>their tennis fans. In part, they reminded me that Russell

0:08:01.200 --> 0:08:04.000
<v Speaker 1>Lokung had it this offseason in the NFL, and again,

0:08:04.120 --> 0:08:08.200
<v Speaker 1>pulmonary embolism left untreated could kill you. So anyway, that's

0:08:08.200 --> 0:08:10.920
<v Speaker 1>the long story. That's why I haven't been there, and

0:08:11.360 --> 0:08:15.240
<v Speaker 1>I'm just happy to be alive. Dude, so well, your

0:08:15.320 --> 0:08:20.400
<v Speaker 1>brother with a diagnosis over the phone, so like unbelievable.

0:08:20.440 --> 0:08:23.960
<v Speaker 1>That's incredible, don't you think, Yeah, no, it's it. There's

0:08:24.000 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>two lessons. One it's good to have a doctor in

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:29.280
<v Speaker 1>the family. That's lesson number one. But the one that's

0:08:29.320 --> 0:08:32.800
<v Speaker 1>more relatable is you really have to listen to your

0:08:32.840 --> 0:08:36.880
<v Speaker 1>body and for you know, the better part of a week.

0:08:37.520 --> 0:08:40.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, I was kind of like, ah, well, you know,

0:08:40.080 --> 0:08:43.040
<v Speaker 1>it's the first segment only and makes sense that you know,

0:08:43.120 --> 0:08:45.040
<v Speaker 1>my heart rate would be up because I'm scooting around

0:08:45.080 --> 0:08:47.640
<v Speaker 1>and I'm going up ramps and you know, maybe that's it.

0:08:47.679 --> 0:08:50.240
<v Speaker 1>And then finally it did get to a point where

0:08:50.240 --> 0:08:52.520
<v Speaker 1>that there's the evidence right in front of you, right,

0:08:53.040 --> 0:08:55.959
<v Speaker 1>and there's no denying. I can't speak for more than

0:08:56.000 --> 0:08:58.679
<v Speaker 1>thirty seconds at a time, and so I just want

0:08:58.760 --> 0:09:01.000
<v Speaker 1>people to remember that when her they have these kinds

0:09:01.000 --> 0:09:03.200
<v Speaker 1>of things, that they should always listen to their bodies,

0:09:03.280 --> 0:09:07.000
<v Speaker 1>because you never know what could be happening to, especially

0:09:07.040 --> 0:09:10.360
<v Speaker 1>in a post surgical situation. So anyway, to everybody who

0:09:10.400 --> 0:09:15.720
<v Speaker 1>wrote tremendously kind things on Twitter, I appreciated. I believe

0:09:15.760 --> 0:09:18.240
<v Speaker 1>I am told I will live now, so this will

0:09:18.280 --> 0:09:20.520
<v Speaker 1>go away, my loss of breath will go away, and

0:09:20.520 --> 0:09:24.840
<v Speaker 1>I will be able to talk at length again, either

0:09:25.320 --> 0:09:28.920
<v Speaker 1>two people's happiness or otherwise. So that's a story, gentlemen.

0:09:28.960 --> 0:09:31.040
<v Speaker 1>So that's why I appreciate you all very much for

0:09:31.080 --> 0:09:35.480
<v Speaker 1>doing and doing the I feel like David Letterman. Remember

0:09:35.480 --> 0:09:37.400
<v Speaker 1>when David Letterman had that heart problem and he thanked

0:09:37.440 --> 0:09:39.080
<v Speaker 1>all his surgeons. I just want to thank everybody at

0:09:39.080 --> 0:09:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Sunrise Hospital in Vegas. Man, it was awesome. That's the story. Well,

0:09:43.160 --> 0:09:44.880
<v Speaker 1>the only thing I would say is if your body

0:09:44.960 --> 0:09:48.199
<v Speaker 1>says to you, give me pizza every half an hour.

0:09:48.240 --> 0:09:49.839
<v Speaker 1>You probably don't want to listen to that one. That's

0:09:49.840 --> 0:09:51.800
<v Speaker 1>a little different. That's a bit of a different problem.

0:09:53.040 --> 0:09:56.480
<v Speaker 1>There you go, Todd, making the near death experience about

0:09:56.880 --> 0:10:01.560
<v Speaker 1>about yourself somehow. All right, Well, at Jeff Well, first though, Jeff,

0:10:01.559 --> 0:10:04.000
<v Speaker 1>I have a feeling your Boddy says that too. I'm

0:10:04.040 --> 0:10:08.480
<v Speaker 1>not I'm not disagreeing with you, Todd. All right, let's

0:10:08.480 --> 0:10:11.720
<v Speaker 1>start how we always start. Circus Sports. Update from Mike

0:10:11.760 --> 0:10:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Palm the conciliaria over there at Circus Sports. What's the latest, Michael, Well, Gil,

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:18.720
<v Speaker 1>as you know, this is the final weekend, Final Sunday

0:10:18.760 --> 0:10:21.880
<v Speaker 1>for quarter three, another hundred forty three thousand, seven hundred

0:10:21.880 --> 0:10:25.079
<v Speaker 1>and fifty on the line. We have one entry at

0:10:25.160 --> 0:10:29.720
<v Speaker 1>thirteen point five, two entries at thirteen points, and five

0:10:30.000 --> 0:10:32.280
<v Speaker 1>entries at twelve and a half, so eight within one

0:10:32.320 --> 0:10:35.160
<v Speaker 1>game of the lead we saw in the first quarter

0:10:35.360 --> 0:10:39.119
<v Speaker 1>seventeen and three one, it in the second quarter seventeen

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:40.960
<v Speaker 1>two and one one, and so I think we're gonna

0:10:40.960 --> 0:10:43.720
<v Speaker 1>be right there around that seventeen seventeen and a half mark.

0:10:44.080 --> 0:10:47.839
<v Speaker 1>What will be remarkable, what will be astounding, is if

0:10:47.880 --> 0:10:50.319
<v Speaker 1>for a third straight quarter, a single person wanted all

0:10:50.320 --> 0:10:53.480
<v Speaker 1>by themselves, really would be and Todd you you sleft off.

0:10:53.559 --> 0:10:57.120
<v Speaker 1>Yes you're not in this. I'm dead. I'm after being

0:10:57.760 --> 0:11:02.040
<v Speaker 1>fifteen and one, I'm now six and one. So I'm

0:11:02.120 --> 0:11:04.319
<v Speaker 1>just hoping to have all the rest of my losses

0:11:04.400 --> 0:11:07.439
<v Speaker 1>this week and then win every single game in December

0:11:07.640 --> 0:11:10.640
<v Speaker 1>to win the December contest. Yeah, and and it does

0:11:10.720 --> 0:11:13.360
<v Speaker 1>bear repeating one more time. The genius of the Circu

0:11:13.480 --> 0:11:18.199
<v Speaker 1>million Circus Sports million is that they have the quarterlies,

0:11:18.280 --> 0:11:20.360
<v Speaker 1>and so for the last five weeks of the season,

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:23.560
<v Speaker 1>we all started zero and zero. We're all still alive

0:11:23.600 --> 0:11:26.360
<v Speaker 1>for a big prize of close to a hundred fifty dollars.

0:11:26.400 --> 0:11:28.959
<v Speaker 1>So we're pumped about that. As you say, get get

0:11:29.040 --> 0:11:31.160
<v Speaker 1>rid of all your losses right now this week. I

0:11:31.160 --> 0:11:33.200
<v Speaker 1>got a teaser right last week. That's the head I

0:11:33.240 --> 0:11:35.720
<v Speaker 1>was just about to say that. You haven't said anything

0:11:35.720 --> 0:11:38.280
<v Speaker 1>about how you actually hit a teaser to what did

0:11:38.280 --> 0:11:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I say to you? I said, I'm gonna catch you

0:11:39.679 --> 0:11:42.000
<v Speaker 1>wish nev, I'm gonna catch you on the teasers, and

0:11:42.040 --> 0:11:45.760
<v Speaker 1>you laughed at me. You're not for I know you're

0:11:45.800 --> 0:11:48.120
<v Speaker 1>two and nine on teasers, on four, six and one

0:11:48.120 --> 0:11:51.000
<v Speaker 1>on teasers. So I could definitely be caught. Let's be clear,

0:11:51.040 --> 0:11:53.000
<v Speaker 1>Stanford Long is two and eight and teasers, I'm O

0:11:53.160 --> 0:11:55.240
<v Speaker 1>and one. I just want to point that out. All right,

0:11:55.280 --> 0:11:57.840
<v Speaker 1>We'll get to our teasers momentarily. Let's start with Thursday Nights,

0:11:57.960 --> 0:12:02.040
<v Speaker 1>Thursday Night footballers and I we start with the Thursday

0:12:02.080 --> 0:12:04.760
<v Speaker 1>night game, and it is Indian Apples at Houston, which

0:12:05.080 --> 0:12:06.880
<v Speaker 1>in a you know, last week we started out with

0:12:06.920 --> 0:12:09.600
<v Speaker 1>really good primetime games. This one sort of continues that

0:12:10.200 --> 0:12:12.439
<v Speaker 1>the battle for the top of the a f C

0:12:12.720 --> 0:12:15.760
<v Speaker 1>South winner will be the leader of the a f

0:12:15.840 --> 0:12:17.720
<v Speaker 1>C South of you tie well, and they're both on top.

0:12:18.040 --> 0:12:21.200
<v Speaker 1>Did this really open six somewhere? Is that true? Where

0:12:21.200 --> 0:12:23.400
<v Speaker 1>did that open six? I see a six opener? But

0:12:23.480 --> 0:12:25.600
<v Speaker 1>Houston is three and a half in this game. Three

0:12:25.640 --> 0:12:29.000
<v Speaker 1>and a half is the spread? Forty six? Forty six

0:12:29.000 --> 0:12:30.920
<v Speaker 1>and a half Somewhere in that pocket is the total?

0:12:31.240 --> 0:12:33.680
<v Speaker 1>Curious doesn't have to be a best bet, but curious

0:12:33.679 --> 0:12:36.560
<v Speaker 1>of any of you have any real conviction in this game? Jeff,

0:12:36.720 --> 0:12:39.880
<v Speaker 1>any thoughts here? I kind of like first half under here.

0:12:40.000 --> 0:12:44.480
<v Speaker 1>GIL three is the number that MC consensus on that

0:12:45.320 --> 0:12:50.280
<v Speaker 1>Houston's offensive line was exposed again last week against Baltimore.

0:12:50.840 --> 0:12:52.640
<v Speaker 1>I am a feeling they're gonna have a problem with

0:12:52.720 --> 0:12:56.440
<v Speaker 1>Indies defense. Indies defense is starting to play better as

0:12:56.480 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 1>we've seen over the last few weeks. Uh, Indie will

0:12:59.400 --> 0:13:01.600
<v Speaker 1>still try of the ground and pound offense. I know

0:13:01.679 --> 0:13:04.079
<v Speaker 1>Marlon Mack is on the shelf with the broken hand,

0:13:04.480 --> 0:13:06.599
<v Speaker 1>but that's the only angle. I kind of like a

0:13:06.720 --> 0:13:10.200
<v Speaker 1>slow start on a short week under first half twenty

0:13:10.240 --> 0:13:12.080
<v Speaker 1>three would be the angle I would look at tonight,

0:13:12.240 --> 0:13:14.720
<v Speaker 1>Mikey Kill It's not a play for me because I'm

0:13:14.760 --> 0:13:17.360
<v Speaker 1>conflicted here. I don't know if t Y Hilton is

0:13:17.360 --> 0:13:19.480
<v Speaker 1>gonna go. I think that makes a tremendous difference in

0:13:19.559 --> 0:13:22.520
<v Speaker 1>the Colts offense. If you look at the first game,

0:13:22.720 --> 0:13:26.600
<v Speaker 1>the statistics, the yards gain very even in this game

0:13:26.800 --> 0:13:30.400
<v Speaker 1>we had to Deshaun Watson turnovers. The key difference was

0:13:30.440 --> 0:13:32.839
<v Speaker 1>the Colts were four for four in the red zone

0:13:33.360 --> 0:13:36.839
<v Speaker 1>and the Bill O'Brien's were two for five. I look

0:13:36.880 --> 0:13:39.080
<v Speaker 1>at this game both ways. I think there maybe there's

0:13:39.120 --> 0:13:40.840
<v Speaker 1>a little bit of value in three and a half

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:43.680
<v Speaker 1>is the number because the look ahead before last week's

0:13:43.720 --> 0:13:46.600
<v Speaker 1>performances at Westgate with five and a half. But I'm

0:13:46.600 --> 0:13:49.320
<v Speaker 1>not playing this game. Maybe an endgame opportunity if we

0:13:49.400 --> 0:13:51.400
<v Speaker 1>see Helton out there. But I'm not playing the game

0:13:51.400 --> 0:13:53.760
<v Speaker 1>pre flop. Yeah, I'm trying to remember what I guessed.

0:13:53.760 --> 0:13:55.520
<v Speaker 1>Oh I did guess five and a half. I guess

0:13:55.559 --> 0:13:58.559
<v Speaker 1>Houston five and a half. So alright, starting to make sense.

0:13:58.720 --> 0:14:01.200
<v Speaker 1>I'm starting to come out of my uh my hospital

0:14:01.240 --> 0:14:04.360
<v Speaker 1>stay to Yeah, I know. I just wanted to say

0:14:04.400 --> 0:14:08.079
<v Speaker 1>that this is the rematch of the game that Jeff

0:14:08.160 --> 0:14:11.000
<v Speaker 1>had the under twenty three a couple of weeks ago

0:14:11.120 --> 0:14:13.960
<v Speaker 1>and he like barely survived with the push. I don't

0:14:13.960 --> 0:14:16.600
<v Speaker 1>know if you remember that, Jeff. That was the game

0:14:16.679 --> 0:14:20.520
<v Speaker 1>that Deshaun Watson, Deshaun Watson was called in the grasp

0:14:20.600 --> 0:14:22.800
<v Speaker 1>on what should have been a touchdown and I lost

0:14:22.840 --> 0:14:25.040
<v Speaker 1>because of that. Talked about that this morning on a

0:14:25.160 --> 0:14:27.560
<v Speaker 1>Numbers game with with my palm about the in the

0:14:27.600 --> 0:14:30.640
<v Speaker 1>grass touchdown, and I said, yes, I remember it while

0:14:30.760 --> 0:14:33.520
<v Speaker 1>Jeff was freaking out because he had the under twenty

0:14:33.520 --> 0:14:36.080
<v Speaker 1>three and he got a miracle push. Um. What I've

0:14:36.080 --> 0:14:38.440
<v Speaker 1>said about this game on a Numbers game all week

0:14:38.600 --> 0:14:41.280
<v Speaker 1>is I don't want to fat and happy. I don't

0:14:41.280 --> 0:14:44.720
<v Speaker 1>want to fat and happy team against the team the

0:14:44.840 --> 0:14:48.520
<v Speaker 1>Instapolis Colts come in fat and happy with a nice win.

0:14:48.960 --> 0:14:53.560
<v Speaker 1>The Houston Texans come in off an absolute destructive loss.

0:14:53.800 --> 0:14:57.320
<v Speaker 1>And I do not want Indianapolis in this spot. Now.

0:14:57.360 --> 0:15:00.480
<v Speaker 1>Do I want Houston? Probably not either, But I certainly

0:15:00.760 --> 0:15:03.400
<v Speaker 1>do not want to take Indianapolis when I when I've

0:15:03.440 --> 0:15:05.640
<v Speaker 1>got the uh, I don't want the fat and happy team.

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:09.480
<v Speaker 1>I want the game. Yeah, Houston fell behind Baltimore last

0:15:09.480 --> 0:15:12.400
<v Speaker 1>week thirty four to nothing. For those who need the reminder,

0:15:12.480 --> 0:15:14.800
<v Speaker 1>they came in with four wins in five games before

0:15:14.840 --> 0:15:17.920
<v Speaker 1>that game, had a by even and then proceeded to

0:15:17.920 --> 0:15:19.760
<v Speaker 1>fall behind the Ravens thirty four and nothing. They only

0:15:19.760 --> 0:15:21.800
<v Speaker 1>had a hundred two yards of offense in the first half,

0:15:22.240 --> 0:15:24.960
<v Speaker 1>gave up four sacks to fall behind fourteen nothing to

0:15:25.040 --> 0:15:28.320
<v Speaker 1>the dynamo that is Lamar Jackson. Two of ten on

0:15:28.400 --> 0:15:30.200
<v Speaker 1>third downs in the game, one of four and four down.

0:15:30.200 --> 0:15:32.400
<v Speaker 1>They were out game four ninety one to thirty two.

0:15:32.440 --> 0:15:35.280
<v Speaker 1>They were out time of possession if you will, thirty

0:15:35.320 --> 0:15:38.760
<v Speaker 1>six ninety one. They were sacked a grand total of

0:15:38.800 --> 0:15:40.880
<v Speaker 1>seven times if you add in the seventh to a J. Mccarren.

0:15:40.960 --> 0:15:42.400
<v Speaker 1>But let me just ask you this before we move

0:15:42.400 --> 0:15:44.840
<v Speaker 1>on from this game. How much of that game, and

0:15:44.880 --> 0:15:46.520
<v Speaker 1>I know it was forty one to seven, and as

0:15:46.520 --> 0:15:48.600
<v Speaker 1>I said, it was thirty four to nothing, but that

0:15:48.760 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 1>non p I which which even withstood a review on

0:15:53.560 --> 0:15:56.480
<v Speaker 1>DeAndre Hopkins. This is one of the big sort of

0:15:56.720 --> 0:15:59.960
<v Speaker 1>nuanced debates one has on Twitter, one has with their buddies.

0:16:01.000 --> 0:16:03.800
<v Speaker 1>Yes it was seven, but I'm in the camp that

0:16:03.880 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 1>if that goes Houston's way, none of us know how

0:16:07.920 --> 0:16:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the rest of that game's going. Probably Baltimore still wins,

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:14.680
<v Speaker 1>but like the entire complexion of that game, in my

0:16:14.720 --> 0:16:17.040
<v Speaker 1>opinion changed, and I'm curious how you guys come down

0:16:17.080 --> 0:16:19.520
<v Speaker 1>on that. You know, I thought about what you're saying, Bill,

0:16:19.560 --> 0:16:22.520
<v Speaker 1>because I had plus ten and a half with the Texans,

0:16:22.560 --> 0:16:25.480
<v Speaker 1>and I learned during the game that Deshaun Watson had

0:16:25.520 --> 0:16:28.760
<v Speaker 1>never lost a game by more than one possession or

0:16:28.800 --> 0:16:32.560
<v Speaker 1>one score in his entire NFL career until that game,

0:16:32.560 --> 0:16:34.160
<v Speaker 1>and I kept thinking, Wow, if we would have got

0:16:34.200 --> 0:16:37.320
<v Speaker 1>that past interference call, would everything have been different. I

0:16:37.360 --> 0:16:39.720
<v Speaker 1>think it might have been a little different, but that

0:16:39.760 --> 0:16:44.680
<v Speaker 1>game was such a dominant performance by Baltimore. Ultimately, I

0:16:44.720 --> 0:16:47.440
<v Speaker 1>think they still get get killed. Ultimately, I think they

0:16:47.440 --> 0:16:49.760
<v Speaker 1>still get beat. I just don't know. I just don't

0:16:49.800 --> 0:16:53.080
<v Speaker 1>think we can say anything with certainty. I don't know. Well,

0:16:53.360 --> 0:16:55.400
<v Speaker 1>Gi well, Gil alsaid, I would have put Houston up

0:16:55.400 --> 0:16:58.040
<v Speaker 1>seven nothing in all likelihoods, right, So then you would

0:16:58.040 --> 0:17:00.880
<v Speaker 1>have had Baltimore chasing the game. I know it was

0:17:00.920 --> 0:17:03.280
<v Speaker 1>still early, but they would have been down a touchdown.

0:17:03.320 --> 0:17:06.040
<v Speaker 1>It's a completely different game potentially, So I'm I'm kind

0:17:06.040 --> 0:17:08.840
<v Speaker 1>of with you, Gil. Uh, We're never gonna know. Baltimore

0:17:08.880 --> 0:17:10.679
<v Speaker 1>probably still wins the game, but it sure as hell

0:17:10.680 --> 0:17:12.480
<v Speaker 1>wouldn't have been a beat down that we saw. Yeah,

0:17:12.560 --> 0:17:14.760
<v Speaker 1>I guess the point here is, does that then change

0:17:14.800 --> 0:17:18.040
<v Speaker 1>your handicapping if you do feel that way? Right on

0:17:18.080 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 1>this particular game, sounds like nobody has any real conviction,

0:17:20.840 --> 0:17:23.480
<v Speaker 1>although Jeff has a first half play, let us start

0:17:23.520 --> 0:17:26.800
<v Speaker 1>with the best bets, parlay you get first shot, sir.

0:17:27.080 --> 0:17:31.600
<v Speaker 1>All right, This is as Todd usually says. Gil. It's

0:17:31.760 --> 0:17:34.639
<v Speaker 1>a tough week again in the National Football League, but

0:17:34.880 --> 0:17:38.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna start. Uh, let's let's go to East Rutherford first.

0:17:38.720 --> 0:17:42.720
<v Speaker 1>My Jets take on the upstart nearly end of a

0:17:42.840 --> 0:17:46.920
<v Speaker 1>f C West leading Oakland Raiders. I'm gonna go over

0:17:47.040 --> 0:17:49.919
<v Speaker 1>forty six and a half here, in this game. The

0:17:50.000 --> 0:17:54.440
<v Speaker 1>Raiders had a slow offensive performance against Cincinnati. I think

0:17:54.480 --> 0:17:56.560
<v Speaker 1>their offense will be able to move the ball against

0:17:56.560 --> 0:18:00.560
<v Speaker 1>the Jets, who just right now we're playing cornerbacks numbers six, seven,

0:18:00.560 --> 0:18:03.800
<v Speaker 1>and eight right now because of injury and just the

0:18:03.840 --> 0:18:06.840
<v Speaker 1>fact that the regular corners stink, they're on their fourth

0:18:06.840 --> 0:18:10.080
<v Speaker 1>and fifth backup linebackers. I feel like Oakland's gonna be

0:18:10.119 --> 0:18:11.760
<v Speaker 1>able to move the ball. They're really gonna be able to.

0:18:11.960 --> 0:18:13.880
<v Speaker 1>I think Jacobs will be able to run the ball

0:18:14.119 --> 0:18:16.359
<v Speaker 1>because of that Oakland offensive line. I know the Jets

0:18:16.359 --> 0:18:18.680
<v Speaker 1>have been good against the run, but I think Oakland's

0:18:18.680 --> 0:18:20.560
<v Speaker 1>old line will figure them out. And I think the

0:18:20.640 --> 0:18:22.960
<v Speaker 1>Jets are gonna move the ball against Oakland as well.

0:18:23.440 --> 0:18:25.960
<v Speaker 1>Uh Donald has played much better the last two weeks

0:18:25.960 --> 0:18:29.680
<v Speaker 1>against bad defenses, and the Giants and the Redskins. Oakland

0:18:29.760 --> 0:18:32.879
<v Speaker 1>is another bad defense. I think Donald plays well. Again,

0:18:33.240 --> 0:18:35.200
<v Speaker 1>this feels like a game where both teams are in

0:18:35.440 --> 0:18:39.480
<v Speaker 1>are in the high twenties. Someone's winning this game thirty

0:18:40.119 --> 0:18:43.240
<v Speaker 1>eight something in that category. So I like this well

0:18:43.280 --> 0:18:45.880
<v Speaker 1>over that forty six and a half consensus that I'm

0:18:45.880 --> 0:18:47.960
<v Speaker 1>seeing right now, over forty six and a half. The

0:18:48.040 --> 0:18:51.560
<v Speaker 1>Jets eclipsing four hundred yards of offense last time for

0:18:51.600 --> 0:18:53.960
<v Speaker 1>the first time in twenty games because they got to

0:18:53.960 --> 0:18:57.880
<v Speaker 1>play the Washington Redskins. Nineteen I thirty was donald for touchdowns,

0:18:57.920 --> 0:19:00.520
<v Speaker 1>one pick. He was sacked twice. Ryan Griffin was his

0:19:00.560 --> 0:19:02.199
<v Speaker 1>big target in that game, five for one on nine

0:19:02.240 --> 0:19:06.000
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown the Raiders. They flirted with disaster with the Bengals,

0:19:06.000 --> 0:19:07.800
<v Speaker 1>but they got it done eventually. Derek Carr had a

0:19:07.840 --> 0:19:10.960
<v Speaker 1>great game two nine two, one touchdown, one pick. He

0:19:11.000 --> 0:19:13.560
<v Speaker 1>was sacked three times, but Joshua Jacobs keeps doing his thing.

0:19:13.640 --> 0:19:16.359
<v Speaker 1>Twenty three carries for one twelve is fourth one yard

0:19:16.400 --> 0:19:19.960
<v Speaker 1>game in the last six weeks. Max Crosby with a

0:19:20.000 --> 0:19:22.159
<v Speaker 1>team rookie record for sacks. The Raiders were seven of

0:19:22.240 --> 0:19:25.240
<v Speaker 1>fifteen on third downs. Third straight win for the Raid

0:19:25.280 --> 0:19:27.920
<v Speaker 1>as all at home, by the way, after a seven

0:19:27.920 --> 0:19:31.040
<v Speaker 1>week stretch on the road, temporarily in a tie with

0:19:31.040 --> 0:19:33.080
<v Speaker 1>the Kansas City Chiefs until the Chiefs won that game

0:19:33.119 --> 0:19:36.040
<v Speaker 1>in Mexico City against the char j By the way, Todd,

0:19:36.080 --> 0:19:38.119
<v Speaker 1>you're supposed to learn the Charger song. We'll get back

0:19:38.160 --> 0:19:40.280
<v Speaker 1>to that place. Let's do that as a placeholder. We

0:19:40.280 --> 0:19:43.080
<v Speaker 1>were giggling in the middle of your little capsule there, Jeff,

0:19:43.080 --> 0:19:44.879
<v Speaker 1>I don't know if you caught. Todd chuckled, and then

0:19:44.960 --> 0:19:47.640
<v Speaker 1>I chuckled. The reason is because we get to see

0:19:47.680 --> 0:19:52.480
<v Speaker 1>Mike Palm on Skype video and Mike Hiss holding a

0:19:52.720 --> 0:19:57.520
<v Speaker 1>massive cross with his savior on that cross. What is

0:19:57.520 --> 0:20:00.960
<v Speaker 1>the significance here? Miked become up asked with the cross

0:20:01.000 --> 0:20:03.199
<v Speaker 1>in the background with the rabbit ears around it in

0:20:03.280 --> 0:20:05.959
<v Speaker 1>my office, and so I thought I'd hold it up

0:20:06.000 --> 0:20:08.040
<v Speaker 1>here for good. It's a very for those obviously you

0:20:08.080 --> 0:20:13.919
<v Speaker 1>can't see. It's a very baroque crucifix. Last week I

0:20:13.960 --> 0:20:16.000
<v Speaker 1>thought it was like some new thing where they have

0:20:16.160 --> 0:20:19.000
<v Speaker 1>rabbit ears with a cross in it. It turns out

0:20:19.200 --> 0:20:22.359
<v Speaker 1>that I was right. There are actually rabbit ears behind

0:20:22.359 --> 0:20:25.280
<v Speaker 1>the cross, but they're not put together. But maybe, now

0:20:25.320 --> 0:20:27.679
<v Speaker 1>that we think about it, Mike, maybe you could, you know,

0:20:28.119 --> 0:20:30.359
<v Speaker 1>come up with a new product of rabbit ears with

0:20:30.400 --> 0:20:32.879
<v Speaker 1>the cross. It's like a way to bring Jesus in

0:20:32.920 --> 0:20:34.680
<v Speaker 1>to listen to you better because you get the rabbit

0:20:34.720 --> 0:20:36.359
<v Speaker 1>ears or something. I don't know, maybe we got a

0:20:36.359 --> 0:20:40.840
<v Speaker 1>product there. Stupidest idea I ever heard. God. Todd brings

0:20:40.920 --> 0:20:43.560
<v Speaker 1>up a good point, though, although two thousand years old.

0:20:43.880 --> 0:20:47.520
<v Speaker 1>Christianity is always evolving. Oh wait to save Todd on

0:20:47.560 --> 0:20:50.359
<v Speaker 1>that one. Very nicely done, Mike with the cross in

0:20:50.400 --> 0:20:54.719
<v Speaker 1>his hand with a best bet. Well, I'd like to balance. Uh.

0:20:55.160 --> 0:20:59.240
<v Speaker 1>Mr Parlay, who Todd commented looked much much thinner on

0:20:59.359 --> 0:21:03.560
<v Speaker 1>market Watch yesterday. Then he remembered him his overplay with

0:21:03.640 --> 0:21:07.640
<v Speaker 1>an under. I like the under in the Steelers Bengals game.

0:21:08.040 --> 0:21:10.440
<v Speaker 1>You know, I don't know where the points coming from

0:21:10.480 --> 0:21:12.960
<v Speaker 1>in this game. Wait, Mike, you're not going to use

0:21:12.960 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 1>a hockey pick as your first pick? Done? Todd? Are

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:23.840
<v Speaker 1>you doing? Okay? Not everybody that tunes into the megapod

0:21:24.320 --> 0:21:27.200
<v Speaker 1>watches a Numbers game when Gil is out. Okay, let's

0:21:27.240 --> 0:21:29.440
<v Speaker 1>get that so that you're you're losing people with these

0:21:29.440 --> 0:21:34.320
<v Speaker 1>references unless you explain them. All right, Steelers Bengals, Uh,

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:37.320
<v Speaker 1>I gotta tell you Gil. I was up the camp

0:21:37.359 --> 0:21:41.520
<v Speaker 1>that when Mason Rudolph came into to replace Big Ben,

0:21:41.600 --> 0:21:44.640
<v Speaker 1>I thought Tomlin was really babying him. And with all

0:21:44.640 --> 0:21:47.840
<v Speaker 1>these as as as Todd says pushed passes that they

0:21:47.920 --> 0:21:50.680
<v Speaker 1>ran on Monday night against the Bengals the first time

0:21:50.720 --> 0:21:54.480
<v Speaker 1>they played, But after watching that performance in Cleveland last week,

0:21:54.520 --> 0:21:57.840
<v Speaker 1>I understand now he's not very good and uh and

0:21:57.960 --> 0:22:00.399
<v Speaker 1>I know that the Bengals defense is not great, but

0:22:00.440 --> 0:22:02.239
<v Speaker 1>they did go on the road and hold a very

0:22:02.280 --> 0:22:06.639
<v Speaker 1>good offense the seventeen points last week um in in Oakland.

0:22:07.000 --> 0:22:08.800
<v Speaker 1>And as far as the Bengals go, as long as

0:22:08.880 --> 0:22:12.040
<v Speaker 1>Dalton doesn't play, I don't see them getting getting past

0:22:12.080 --> 0:22:15.919
<v Speaker 1>ten with Finley at quarterback against a very very decent

0:22:15.960 --> 0:22:18.119
<v Speaker 1>Steelers defense. So I'm gonna go under thirty eight and

0:22:18.160 --> 0:22:20.800
<v Speaker 1>a half. Here is my best bet. First be under

0:22:21.080 --> 0:22:23.600
<v Speaker 1>thirty eight and a half. Todd confirming thirty eight and

0:22:23.600 --> 0:22:25.800
<v Speaker 1>a half. Good number. Yes, yes, I like to Mike

0:22:25.840 --> 0:22:28.200
<v Speaker 1>didn't try to uh, you know, give himself an extra

0:22:28.240 --> 0:22:31.760
<v Speaker 1>half a point, my prick. My first best bet. I

0:22:31.840 --> 0:22:34.160
<v Speaker 1>know we didn't get it last week, but we got

0:22:34.160 --> 0:22:37.520
<v Speaker 1>it the five previous weeks is once again the Miami

0:22:37.600 --> 0:22:41.600
<v Speaker 1>Football Dolphins. The Miami Dolphins. Yep, I'm doing it again.

0:22:41.800 --> 0:22:43.840
<v Speaker 1>And here's the reason that Cleveland Brown should not be

0:22:43.880 --> 0:22:49.080
<v Speaker 1>favored by ten and a half points against anybody Cleveland again,

0:22:49.119 --> 0:22:51.280
<v Speaker 1>coming off that win against the Steelers, I should say

0:22:51.280 --> 0:22:53.359
<v Speaker 1>a game that they desperately tried to give to the

0:22:53.359 --> 0:22:56.159
<v Speaker 1>Steelers but couldn't Baker Mayfield seventeen and thirty two for

0:22:56.240 --> 0:22:59.959
<v Speaker 1>one nine, two touchdowns, no picks, in a sack. Odell

0:23:00.040 --> 0:23:02.359
<v Speaker 1>Beckham was targeted ten times, but they only got the

0:23:02.400 --> 0:23:05.440
<v Speaker 1>ball to him four times for sixty yards. Eight penalties

0:23:05.480 --> 0:23:10.160
<v Speaker 1>against for the Brownies UM one yards and penalties. Dolphins

0:23:10.200 --> 0:23:12.760
<v Speaker 1>coming off a beat down at the hands of the Bills.

0:23:12.760 --> 0:23:17.520
<v Speaker 1>I think it was. Yeah, Miami kept on in teaser position,

0:23:17.640 --> 0:23:21.120
<v Speaker 1>but they were never in cover position. Ryan FITZPATRICKTT five

0:23:21.280 --> 0:23:25.080
<v Speaker 1>three twenty three, no touchdowns, no pick, sacked seven times.

0:23:25.119 --> 0:23:27.280
<v Speaker 1>And the Dolphins and what was the theme last week

0:23:27.800 --> 0:23:31.960
<v Speaker 1>of many teams very few yards rushing twenty three yards rushing.

0:23:32.400 --> 0:23:36.240
<v Speaker 1>I get it, you fall behind, but to completely abandon

0:23:36.320 --> 0:23:39.080
<v Speaker 1>the running game and to completely do nothing on the

0:23:39.080 --> 0:23:41.240
<v Speaker 1>ground is this new thing in the National Football League?

0:23:41.640 --> 0:23:43.440
<v Speaker 1>I guessed you know, this is one of these interesting

0:23:43.560 --> 0:23:46.639
<v Speaker 1>lines that you guess on a Monday, because I have

0:23:46.960 --> 0:23:51.640
<v Speaker 1>the the reference of the previous Steelers Dolphins game in Pittsburgh,

0:23:51.720 --> 0:23:54.000
<v Speaker 1>which was the most off guests of all time, where

0:23:54.040 --> 0:23:57.560
<v Speaker 1>I guessed Dolphins would be seven and a half point dogs,

0:23:57.560 --> 0:23:59.399
<v Speaker 1>when in fact they were fourteen and a half point

0:23:59.400 --> 0:24:01.160
<v Speaker 1>dogs or four team whatever it was at the time,

0:24:01.280 --> 0:24:04.000
<v Speaker 1>which was just outlandish. I knew that a guest of

0:24:04.080 --> 0:24:06.760
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half here would be short, but that's

0:24:06.800 --> 0:24:09.600
<v Speaker 1>what I would have this number and Chrissie's response Chris

0:24:09.640 --> 0:24:12.560
<v Speaker 1>Andrews South Point Casino Sports with director. He was like,

0:24:12.560 --> 0:24:15.400
<v Speaker 1>I like your number better, but it's not only ten,

0:24:15.520 --> 0:24:17.840
<v Speaker 1>it's ten and a half, and just on principle, Cleveland

0:24:17.880 --> 0:24:19.480
<v Speaker 1>should not be that big of a favorite. I'm taking

0:24:19.520 --> 0:24:22.680
<v Speaker 1>the Miami Dolphins based on the number here. Not gonna

0:24:22.680 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 1>watch it. I don't want to have to live through it.

0:24:25.200 --> 0:24:27.240
<v Speaker 1>But Dolphins plus ten and a half is picked number

0:24:27.240 --> 0:24:29.879
<v Speaker 1>one for me. I kind of agree. I kind of

0:24:29.920 --> 0:24:32.200
<v Speaker 1>agree with you, Gil. I'm just a little concerned that

0:24:32.280 --> 0:24:35.120
<v Speaker 1>Miami had covered all those zillion games in a row

0:24:35.160 --> 0:24:37.920
<v Speaker 1>and now maybe they'll have a fallback. But how can

0:24:37.920 --> 0:24:40.359
<v Speaker 1>Freddie Kitchen to be favored by kind and a half

0:24:40.359 --> 0:24:43.440
<v Speaker 1>against anybody? I mean, that's ridiculous. But anyways, you want

0:24:43.440 --> 0:24:45.800
<v Speaker 1>my best bet, I assume because we've had Jeff's over

0:24:46.520 --> 0:24:48.880
<v Speaker 1>and a half and Mike's under thirty eight and a half,

0:24:48.920 --> 0:24:52.720
<v Speaker 1>So my best bet is going to be do you

0:24:52.760 --> 0:24:55.840
<v Speaker 1>ever hear of the um saying if it ain't broke,

0:24:56.080 --> 0:24:59.359
<v Speaker 1>don't fix it. I know what's coming. Tampa Bay. Come

0:24:59.480 --> 0:25:06.520
<v Speaker 1>spoke your Tampa Bay Buccaneers over the total one more time, baby,

0:25:06.960 --> 0:25:13.639
<v Speaker 1>I half for fifty one gil, I see uh is?

0:25:13.800 --> 0:25:15.600
<v Speaker 1>I think is more than fifty one and a half.

0:25:15.800 --> 0:25:17.760
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what Mike palms waving at, but I

0:25:18.080 --> 0:25:19.520
<v Speaker 1>want to just tell you why I want to take

0:25:19.560 --> 0:25:22.640
<v Speaker 1>the Tampa Bay over. Tampa Bay has gone over eight

0:25:22.880 --> 0:25:26.280
<v Speaker 1>thousand weeks in a row. They're the greatest over team

0:25:26.400 --> 0:25:29.879
<v Speaker 1>since sliced bread. All. They don't play defense, which is

0:25:29.880 --> 0:25:32.800
<v Speaker 1>great for the other team's offense. They don't they can

0:25:32.880 --> 0:25:35.200
<v Speaker 1>play offense, so they can get you points on their

0:25:35.240 --> 0:25:38.200
<v Speaker 1>side of the football. So it's a fantastic over team

0:25:38.200 --> 0:25:40.480
<v Speaker 1>because every time somebody has the ball, there a threat

0:25:40.520 --> 0:25:43.920
<v Speaker 1>to score immediately. And on top of that, you get

0:25:43.920 --> 0:25:47.159
<v Speaker 1>the beautiful um idea that old Jamis can blow up

0:25:47.200 --> 0:25:48.800
<v Speaker 1>at any moment and throw a pick six for you

0:25:48.840 --> 0:25:51.320
<v Speaker 1>as well. So that's why Tampa Bay is such a

0:25:51.359 --> 0:25:53.439
<v Speaker 1>beautiful over. I'm not sure what their record is. I

0:25:53.440 --> 0:25:55.040
<v Speaker 1>think it's like eight and two or nine and two

0:25:55.080 --> 0:25:58.240
<v Speaker 1>to the over this year, but it's someone goodly record

0:25:58.320 --> 0:26:01.520
<v Speaker 1>and they're not even making us hey that much. Fifty

0:26:01.640 --> 0:26:06.080
<v Speaker 1>one it's not even that high Atlanta. Okay, here's Atlanta.

0:26:06.359 --> 0:26:09.960
<v Speaker 1>The worst defensive team in football beyond the Massachusetts Minutemen

0:26:10.359 --> 0:26:12.680
<v Speaker 1>until the last two weeks, when all of a sudden

0:26:12.920 --> 0:26:16.439
<v Speaker 1>they decided to play defense against New Orleans and whoever

0:26:16.480 --> 0:26:18.920
<v Speaker 1>they played last week I doesn't come to mind immediately,

0:26:18.960 --> 0:26:22.240
<v Speaker 1>but they played South Carolina and they played good on

0:26:22.320 --> 0:26:26.119
<v Speaker 1>defense against Logan. So basically, which Atlanta defense is the

0:26:26.160 --> 0:26:28.800
<v Speaker 1>real defense, the one that didn't play the entire season

0:26:29.040 --> 0:26:31.720
<v Speaker 1>or the one that played for two weeks. I don't know,

0:26:32.200 --> 0:26:37.040
<v Speaker 1>but I'll say this, give me Tampa Bay over fifty one,

0:26:37.240 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 1>thank you and thank you. He ends everything with thank you.

0:26:41.359 --> 0:26:43.520
<v Speaker 1>Go on, I'm gonna do a lot of those thank you.

0:26:43.640 --> 0:26:45.639
<v Speaker 1>People seem to like that. So that came down from

0:26:45.680 --> 0:26:47.800
<v Speaker 1>fifty four and a half. So you're chalking that up

0:26:47.840 --> 0:26:51.800
<v Speaker 1>to the recency effect of the Atlanta Falcons finding their defense?

0:26:51.840 --> 0:26:53.440
<v Speaker 1>Is that what you're chalking that up to? I don't

0:26:53.480 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 1>know what people are looking at. What in the hell

0:26:55.800 --> 0:26:58.560
<v Speaker 1>are they thinking? Last week the same thing against the Saints.

0:26:58.600 --> 0:27:02.160
<v Speaker 1>They people bet it down. I mean, it's unbelievable. Are

0:27:02.200 --> 0:27:05.240
<v Speaker 1>these people watching the games? I mean, last night again

0:27:05.280 --> 0:27:09.719
<v Speaker 1>in the Toledo Buffalo game. There was. It was at

0:27:09.760 --> 0:27:11.800
<v Speaker 1>the half and they were betting the second half under.

0:27:12.160 --> 0:27:14.440
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what they were seeing because both teams

0:27:14.440 --> 0:27:16.159
<v Speaker 1>were going up and down the field and it was

0:27:16.200 --> 0:27:19.119
<v Speaker 1>so pulled in Buffalo, nobody wanted to tackle anybody. I

0:27:19.160 --> 0:27:22.480
<v Speaker 1>took the over. Guess what we got there. It's ridiculous

0:27:22.520 --> 0:27:25.119
<v Speaker 1>sometimes these people. I had Buffalo in the over in

0:27:25.119 --> 0:27:27.800
<v Speaker 1>that game. Pre flow that worked out. Um, the MAC

0:27:27.960 --> 0:27:30.600
<v Speaker 1>is horrific, by the way, Like these teams in the

0:27:30.640 --> 0:27:34.280
<v Speaker 1>MAC are so bad this year. Whoever gets into bowl games.

0:27:34.320 --> 0:27:36.800
<v Speaker 1>He was mentioning this over the last night. He was

0:27:36.840 --> 0:27:39.800
<v Speaker 1>talking about this. It's almost an auto play against these

0:27:39.840 --> 0:27:42.680
<v Speaker 1>MAC teams. They are so bad this year. Those Tuesday

0:27:42.760 --> 0:27:46.480
<v Speaker 1>Wednesday games are awful. Like you wonder what level football

0:27:46.520 --> 0:27:49.480
<v Speaker 1>you're watching with that just a brief aside. By the way, Jeff,

0:27:49.520 --> 0:27:51.680
<v Speaker 1>we're back to you. I really liked them because it's

0:27:51.680 --> 0:27:53.320
<v Speaker 1>hard to get tickets to the game, so I just

0:27:53.359 --> 0:27:55.600
<v Speaker 1>like to watch them on TV. If you notice, the

0:27:55.600 --> 0:28:01.359
<v Speaker 1>crowds are who they're outstanding, outstanding, Not a ticket remains, Jeff.

0:28:01.720 --> 0:28:06.800
<v Speaker 1>Number two, I'm liking overs today this week for whatever reason, guys,

0:28:06.840 --> 0:28:10.120
<v Speaker 1>and this one it may come as a shock, uh

0:28:10.160 --> 0:28:12.800
<v Speaker 1>to to everyone listening and too you guys there, I'm

0:28:12.840 --> 0:28:16.720
<v Speaker 1>going over in Buffalo and Denvert thirty seven and a half. Now,

0:28:17.240 --> 0:28:20.199
<v Speaker 1>I understand that both of these teams are good defensive teams.

0:28:20.440 --> 0:28:23.520
<v Speaker 1>I know Denver's offense is led by Brandon Allen. I

0:28:23.560 --> 0:28:26.280
<v Speaker 1>know the Bills are led by the erratic Josh Allen.

0:28:26.760 --> 0:28:28.560
<v Speaker 1>But you know what else I'll say this with with

0:28:28.640 --> 0:28:32.360
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo's offense, now that's singletary is healthy. The run game

0:28:32.440 --> 0:28:36.200
<v Speaker 1>looks normal. John Brown has been great as a legitimate

0:28:36.280 --> 0:28:39.479
<v Speaker 1>number one wide receiver for Josh Allen. And I know

0:28:39.640 --> 0:28:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Denver's corners are good, but they really got exposed last

0:28:43.080 --> 0:28:46.920
<v Speaker 1>week in the second half against Minnesota. The third all

0:28:46.960 --> 0:28:49.240
<v Speaker 1>I need to get over and this is is twenty

0:28:49.360 --> 0:28:53.520
<v Speaker 1>is twenty. I feel that's uh, that's more than possible here.

0:28:53.760 --> 0:28:56.080
<v Speaker 1>And Brandon Allen has been pretty good and his two

0:28:56.160 --> 0:28:59.120
<v Speaker 1>starts for the Denver Broncos, which is a sentence I

0:28:59.160 --> 0:29:01.200
<v Speaker 1>don't think any of us would have expected to be

0:29:01.240 --> 0:29:04.960
<v Speaker 1>hearing at any point this year, and for regardless of

0:29:05.000 --> 0:29:07.719
<v Speaker 1>who Brandon Allen would be playing for. But I like

0:29:07.760 --> 0:29:09.720
<v Speaker 1>over thirty seven and a half in Buffalo the weather

0:29:09.800 --> 0:29:12.040
<v Speaker 1>is gonna be good too. It's supposed to be forty

0:29:12.080 --> 0:29:14.960
<v Speaker 1>and sunny, not much wind there in Orchard Park, under

0:29:14.960 --> 0:29:18.000
<v Speaker 1>ten miles an hour, so that we can get field

0:29:18.040 --> 0:29:21.200
<v Speaker 1>goals that without ridiculous wind. So I like I like

0:29:21.280 --> 0:29:23.520
<v Speaker 1>over thirty seven and a half in Buffalo and Denver

0:29:24.040 --> 0:29:26.719
<v Speaker 1>to a f C East a f C West matchups

0:29:26.960 --> 0:29:29.640
<v Speaker 1>over for me, so fun. I appreciate the fact that

0:29:29.680 --> 0:29:32.000
<v Speaker 1>you check your Doppler and check the weather forecast, Jeff,

0:29:32.040 --> 0:29:34.840
<v Speaker 1>because this is a perfect example, Todd, that you would

0:29:34.840 --> 0:29:36.520
<v Speaker 1>be in the middle of your rant on a game

0:29:36.560 --> 0:29:38.080
<v Speaker 1>on and over and you would be like, hey, can

0:29:38.120 --> 0:29:40.400
<v Speaker 1>anybody check the weather for me? Is what's that gonna

0:29:40.400 --> 0:29:41.880
<v Speaker 1>be like in the middle of it? So he, Jeff

0:29:41.920 --> 0:29:44.840
<v Speaker 1>did it before the show. I'm gonna pretend I didn't

0:29:44.840 --> 0:29:47.680
<v Speaker 1>hear the last ten seconds. Go ahead, all right, Mike,

0:29:48.160 --> 0:29:51.640
<v Speaker 1>Mike without a cross. He has Uh decided to converge,

0:29:51.880 --> 0:29:53.800
<v Speaker 1>or at least shun his religion for the moment and

0:29:53.840 --> 0:29:58.080
<v Speaker 1>make another bet. As much as Uh Todd believes in

0:29:58.160 --> 0:30:01.719
<v Speaker 1>Tampa Bay over, I believe been fading Dwayne Haskins. I'm

0:30:01.720 --> 0:30:04.160
<v Speaker 1>gonna lay three points with the Lions on the road.

0:30:05.720 --> 0:30:08.800
<v Speaker 1>Mike try again. You can move the line again, Todd.

0:30:08.840 --> 0:30:11.840
<v Speaker 1>You screwed me on half a goal on Tuesday. L Gil,

0:30:12.200 --> 0:30:15.720
<v Speaker 1>what's the line? It's not three in Detroit? Watch you know.

0:30:15.840 --> 0:30:17.120
<v Speaker 1>And the reason that I know it's three and a

0:30:17.160 --> 0:30:20.320
<v Speaker 1>half is because Mike has jumped exactly on my number two. Bet,

0:30:20.400 --> 0:30:22.760
<v Speaker 1>I'll let it. I'll let Mike go first. It's minus

0:30:22.800 --> 0:30:24.480
<v Speaker 1>three and a half. But do you notice how he

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:28.000
<v Speaker 1>tries to slide that past to skill in a certain way.

0:30:28.840 --> 0:30:31.120
<v Speaker 1>It brings to mind another person we always love to

0:30:31.120 --> 0:30:33.760
<v Speaker 1>talk about. But he tries to slide those half points.

0:30:33.760 --> 0:30:36.640
<v Speaker 1>But he tried to slide an entire half goal past

0:30:36.760 --> 0:30:39.480
<v Speaker 1>me on on on a numbers game, an entire half

0:30:39.480 --> 0:30:41.880
<v Speaker 1>a goal. That's a huge number five and half to

0:30:41.960 --> 0:30:48.280
<v Speaker 1>sex It's incredible. Like someone get him a respirator. You

0:30:48.360 --> 0:30:50.120
<v Speaker 1>still like it at three and a half, Mike? Yeah,

0:30:50.240 --> 0:30:52.840
<v Speaker 1>I do? Uh I just here's what I do, Gil.

0:30:52.920 --> 0:30:55.479
<v Speaker 1>I look at the circuit number right before we go

0:30:55.520 --> 0:30:57.280
<v Speaker 1>on the air, and it was three. So three and

0:30:57.320 --> 0:31:00.400
<v Speaker 1>a half here, Dwayne Haskins is not an NFL quarritor. Now,

0:31:00.600 --> 0:31:03.760
<v Speaker 1>it's a complete joke. The Jets are not a juggernaut

0:31:03.800 --> 0:31:05.920
<v Speaker 1>of a DV They tried to keep Washington in the

0:31:05.960 --> 0:31:09.360
<v Speaker 1>game last week with all their mistakes, and still Dwayne

0:31:09.360 --> 0:31:13.080
<v Speaker 1>Haskins cannot do it. He cannot read a defense. There's

0:31:13.120 --> 0:31:16.240
<v Speaker 1>a very limited playbook for Washington. He just doesn't belong

0:31:16.240 --> 0:31:18.080
<v Speaker 1>in the least. He's not ready. I'm not sure he'll

0:31:18.080 --> 0:31:21.280
<v Speaker 1>ever be ready. Um. You know the Lions. The Lions

0:31:21.320 --> 0:31:25.240
<v Speaker 1>are still gonna put up points with drisk call He's serviceable. Um,

0:31:25.320 --> 0:31:28.800
<v Speaker 1>and I just I have to fade Haskins until Callahan

0:31:28.880 --> 0:31:32.000
<v Speaker 1>decides where the organization decides that he's not the answer.

0:31:32.080 --> 0:31:34.640
<v Speaker 1>So it's just like pictures. When we get these pictures

0:31:34.640 --> 0:31:36.400
<v Speaker 1>in baseball. We hope they don't send them down to

0:31:36.440 --> 0:31:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Triple A. I hope they keep starting Dwayne Haskins every week. Well,

0:31:39.680 --> 0:31:41.680
<v Speaker 1>they the three and a hook with the Lions. Well,

0:31:41.720 --> 0:31:44.040
<v Speaker 1>they are going to start Dwayne Haskins Jr. Every week

0:31:44.040 --> 0:31:47.200
<v Speaker 1>because that's what they said they do, and Daniel Snyder

0:31:47.200 --> 0:31:49.440
<v Speaker 1>wants to be besties with him, So it's going to happen.

0:31:50.080 --> 0:31:52.080
<v Speaker 1>The Lions of lost six of seven. I don't care.

0:31:52.120 --> 0:31:53.800
<v Speaker 1>I don't care if it's Matthew Stafford, I don't care

0:31:53.800 --> 0:31:56.320
<v Speaker 1>it's Jeff drist call. I don't care if it's Greg Landry.

0:31:56.520 --> 0:31:59.000
<v Speaker 1>I don't care if it's Gary Danielson at his current

0:31:59.040 --> 0:32:03.560
<v Speaker 1>age for the Redskins worst ten games or Joey Harrington.

0:32:04.080 --> 0:32:06.239
<v Speaker 1>For the Skins it's their worst ten game starts its

0:32:06.320 --> 0:32:08.840
<v Speaker 1>nineteen sixty one. They were oh nine and one. Apparently

0:32:08.880 --> 0:32:11.560
<v Speaker 1>that year there one in nine right now. Haskins, by

0:32:11.560 --> 0:32:14.560
<v Speaker 1>the way, nineteen of thirty five last week for two touchdowns,

0:32:14.600 --> 0:32:18.760
<v Speaker 1>one pick, and here's the deal. Sacked six times. Redskins

0:32:18.800 --> 0:32:21.040
<v Speaker 1>could only muster two five total yards. They had eleven

0:32:21.040 --> 0:32:24.240
<v Speaker 1>penalties for sixty six yards. Did you see that video

0:32:24.320 --> 0:32:27.520
<v Speaker 1>with Dwayne Haskins pleading with his offensive lineman, tell me

0:32:27.640 --> 0:32:30.320
<v Speaker 1>what I need to do to help you? And the

0:32:30.440 --> 0:32:34.800
<v Speaker 1>lineman just sat there and were either speechless or almost snickered.

0:32:35.280 --> 0:32:39.920
<v Speaker 1>It was so uncomfortable to watch. It was just, what's

0:32:39.960 --> 0:32:44.280
<v Speaker 1>that full frontal lobotomy for Clem? He calls him Clem Haskins,

0:32:44.360 --> 0:32:47.600
<v Speaker 1>former watching a bullet, Former Golden Gopher coach Clem Haskins.

0:32:47.680 --> 0:32:51.720
<v Speaker 1>The Redskins had a sixteen quarter streak of not scoring

0:32:51.720 --> 0:32:54.400
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown until they broke that with the Darius Guys

0:32:54.760 --> 0:32:57.120
<v Speaker 1>forty five yards screen last week in the fourth quarter.

0:32:57.480 --> 0:32:59.920
<v Speaker 1>The last team we were mentioning this on guessing lines

0:33:00.000 --> 0:33:02.280
<v Speaker 1>this week, the last team to go sixteen quarters without

0:33:02.280 --> 0:33:05.360
<v Speaker 1>scoring a touchdown was, of all things, the two thousand

0:33:05.480 --> 0:33:09.600
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl champion Baltimore Ravens, who started that year five

0:33:09.600 --> 0:33:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and one with Tony Banks and then they had this

0:33:11.720 --> 0:33:14.800
<v Speaker 1>unbelievable drought and that's when they went to Trent Dilford

0:33:14.800 --> 0:33:16.600
<v Speaker 1>and the rest is history. They won the Super Bowl.

0:33:16.760 --> 0:33:19.280
<v Speaker 1>Whereas Redskins fans today like to say, so, you're saying

0:33:19.280 --> 0:33:22.760
<v Speaker 1>there's a chance Skins allowed thirty four points to the Jets,

0:33:22.760 --> 0:33:25.000
<v Speaker 1>by the way, who entered that game with the worst

0:33:25.040 --> 0:33:27.240
<v Speaker 1>offense in the league. And now it looks like Greg

0:33:27.280 --> 0:33:31.440
<v Speaker 1>Modowski's job is in jeopardy. Is decordinator. I'm with Mike.

0:33:32.080 --> 0:33:34.720
<v Speaker 1>I don't care who's playing quarterback. It's three and a half.

0:33:35.120 --> 0:33:38.480
<v Speaker 1>Give me the Lions, prove me wrong, Redskins one of

0:33:38.520 --> 0:33:41.560
<v Speaker 1>those bets. You've gotta be willing to lose Toddy number two. OK,

0:33:41.720 --> 0:33:43.840
<v Speaker 1>here's here's what I'm willing to do. I'm gonna pass

0:33:43.880 --> 0:33:46.880
<v Speaker 1>the hat right now, and I'm gonna offer both of

0:33:46.880 --> 0:33:49.280
<v Speaker 1>you to put money in the hat for me not

0:33:49.360 --> 0:33:52.400
<v Speaker 1>to bet Detroit. This week, because if I bet Detroit

0:33:52.920 --> 0:33:56.440
<v Speaker 1>along with you guys, here's what's gonna happens. Is going

0:33:56.480 --> 0:33:58.520
<v Speaker 1>to go back to past early in the first quarter,

0:33:58.880 --> 0:34:02.560
<v Speaker 1>take a Faroe just hit, be knocked out of the game,

0:34:02.680 --> 0:34:06.760
<v Speaker 1>bringing in yep, that's right, a c Keenum and then

0:34:07.360 --> 0:34:10.120
<v Speaker 1>Edskins go on to victory because I bet the game.

0:34:10.239 --> 0:34:12.319
<v Speaker 1>So if you guys would like to protect your bet,

0:34:12.640 --> 0:34:17.759
<v Speaker 1>I would suggest buying me off from betting that game. Okay,

0:34:18.320 --> 0:34:22.000
<v Speaker 1>there you go. You gotta you gotta protect your bet. No,

0:34:22.120 --> 0:34:26.560
<v Speaker 1>but do you know that if I do bet? Okay,

0:34:26.640 --> 0:34:28.520
<v Speaker 1>so now let me give you my second pick. That's

0:34:28.520 --> 0:34:30.600
<v Speaker 1>why I'm gonna stay off this game. I happen to

0:34:30.640 --> 0:34:33.080
<v Speaker 1>agree with both of you. You have to just keep

0:34:33.080 --> 0:34:35.719
<v Speaker 1>betting against Haskin. He's a gift. He's a He's a

0:34:35.760 --> 0:34:38.960
<v Speaker 1>Christmas gift. You gotta love it now. Um. Also, I

0:34:39.040 --> 0:34:41.400
<v Speaker 1>kind of like what Jeffrey said about the over thirty

0:34:41.440 --> 0:34:43.960
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half Buffalo Denver. I think those thirty

0:34:43.960 --> 0:34:47.719
<v Speaker 1>seven and a half should be reserved for really, really

0:34:48.080 --> 0:34:51.799
<v Speaker 1>really cruddy offensive teams like the Bears. Buffalo and Denver

0:34:51.880 --> 0:34:53.960
<v Speaker 1>are not that bad. So I kind of like what

0:34:54.000 --> 0:34:56.000
<v Speaker 1>Jeffrey had to say too. But I'm gonna go with

0:34:56.040 --> 0:34:59.840
<v Speaker 1>my second pick with the Sea Hattle. I mean the

0:35:00.000 --> 0:35:07.120
<v Speaker 1>Philadelphia Eagles. Fly. Eagles Fly. You faked us out, all right, Philli, Yes,

0:35:07.360 --> 0:35:11.080
<v Speaker 1>messed up there. The Philadelphia Eagles giving one? Is that

0:35:11.160 --> 0:35:12.640
<v Speaker 1>what you have to pick them? Or one? What do

0:35:12.719 --> 0:35:14.719
<v Speaker 1>you have kind of all over the place? Right, there's

0:35:14.760 --> 0:35:17.440
<v Speaker 1>a there's a couple of ones. There's actually more one

0:35:17.480 --> 0:35:19.400
<v Speaker 1>and a half than anything. So we'll say one of

0:35:19.440 --> 0:35:20.959
<v Speaker 1>the halfs. I'll take it at one and a half.

0:35:21.040 --> 0:35:24.439
<v Speaker 1>Then I'll take the Eagles at one and a half.

0:35:24.920 --> 0:35:27.680
<v Speaker 1>And here's why I like the Eagles. To me, I

0:35:27.800 --> 0:35:30.040
<v Speaker 1>can't get out of my head the fact that Seattle

0:35:30.200 --> 0:35:32.560
<v Speaker 1>should have lost to Cleveland on the road in a

0:35:32.680 --> 0:35:35.760
<v Speaker 1>game that Cleveland just gave away. They were up twelve

0:35:35.880 --> 0:35:38.360
<v Speaker 1>late in the first half, going in for another score

0:35:38.680 --> 0:35:41.360
<v Speaker 1>and Jesus Mayfield throws an interception in the back of

0:35:41.440 --> 0:35:44.840
<v Speaker 1>the end zone and totally changes the game. Um, you

0:35:44.920 --> 0:35:47.480
<v Speaker 1>know they barely won that Rams game. I know they've

0:35:47.520 --> 0:35:50.400
<v Speaker 1>got m V P. Russell Wilson. I know he's fantastic

0:35:50.480 --> 0:35:53.400
<v Speaker 1>and everything, But the Eagles to me, are a weird

0:35:53.560 --> 0:35:55.680
<v Speaker 1>kind of team. They seem to play up to the

0:35:55.840 --> 0:35:58.719
<v Speaker 1>level of the competition last week. They could have won

0:35:58.840 --> 0:36:01.960
<v Speaker 1>that game against New England. I mean, they played very

0:36:02.040 --> 0:36:04.680
<v Speaker 1>well on defense. You couldn't really fault them there. They

0:36:04.719 --> 0:36:06.920
<v Speaker 1>just couldn't get anything going on offense. But a lot

0:36:06.960 --> 0:36:09.120
<v Speaker 1>of people have had trouble with the New England defense.

0:36:09.360 --> 0:36:11.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean the New England. Yeah, the New England defense.

0:36:11.440 --> 0:36:13.960
<v Speaker 1>So I'm not that shocked that they lost the game,

0:36:14.000 --> 0:36:15.480
<v Speaker 1>but I thought they kept it close. I think it's

0:36:15.480 --> 0:36:17.680
<v Speaker 1>a real tough place to play. Seattle has to go

0:36:17.760 --> 0:36:20.080
<v Speaker 1>all the way across country to play him. Now. Granted,

0:36:20.160 --> 0:36:22.560
<v Speaker 1>Seattle has an excellent record, as heard on the Numbers

0:36:22.640 --> 0:36:26.560
<v Speaker 1>game uh this morning, doing these these cross country games,

0:36:26.880 --> 0:36:28.879
<v Speaker 1>but you know, one and a half is just such

0:36:28.920 --> 0:36:30.960
<v Speaker 1>a low number. All I gotta do is have the

0:36:31.000 --> 0:36:34.319
<v Speaker 1>Eagles win the game. Practically, I'll take the Eagles. How

0:36:34.360 --> 0:36:36.160
<v Speaker 1>do we feel about Carson Wentz. I mean, the Eagles

0:36:36.200 --> 0:36:37.960
<v Speaker 1>did not have the Shawn Jackson, they did not have

0:36:38.040 --> 0:36:41.120
<v Speaker 1>al Shan, Jeffrey h they didn't have Jordan Howard. So

0:36:41.239 --> 0:36:44.320
<v Speaker 1>there's that. But man, sometimes you look up in Carson

0:36:44.400 --> 0:36:47.240
<v Speaker 1>Wentz is really like some of his throws, I'm like, wow,

0:36:47.520 --> 0:36:49.480
<v Speaker 1>I don't really expect that from Carson Wentz. I'm not.

0:36:49.560 --> 0:36:52.239
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious where you stand on him now. Town. Uh.

0:36:52.640 --> 0:36:54.560
<v Speaker 1>You know, I used to think he was like, really

0:36:54.640 --> 0:36:58.799
<v Speaker 1>really good. Now I'm still thinking he's maybe just good. Um,

0:36:58.960 --> 0:37:00.839
<v Speaker 1>But you know, they have had some good games. To look,

0:37:00.880 --> 0:37:03.279
<v Speaker 1>they went into Buffalo, a tough place to to play

0:37:03.360 --> 0:37:05.800
<v Speaker 1>offensive football, and they played really well well on the

0:37:05.880 --> 0:37:09.280
<v Speaker 1>offensive end. So I just think they're They're an incomplete team.

0:37:09.640 --> 0:37:11.960
<v Speaker 1>They went into they went into Green Bay and played

0:37:12.080 --> 0:37:15.320
<v Speaker 1>very well on offense. They're very jekyl and highish. But

0:37:15.400 --> 0:37:17.560
<v Speaker 1>they wouldn't be the first team to have trouble against

0:37:17.600 --> 0:37:20.320
<v Speaker 1>New England defense. And I don't think Seattle's defense is

0:37:20.400 --> 0:37:23.399
<v Speaker 1>that good. So you know, that's why I want the Eagles. Yeah,

0:37:23.480 --> 0:37:25.279
<v Speaker 1>and I still think they win the NFC East. I

0:37:25.360 --> 0:37:28.920
<v Speaker 1>really do. Much of the chagrin of of Cowboys fans,

0:37:29.000 --> 0:37:32.920
<v Speaker 1>but I just think that they will be the ultimate survivor. Uh.

0:37:33.000 --> 0:37:36.080
<v Speaker 1>Do we know who's playing among those guys? By the way, well, well,

0:37:36.160 --> 0:37:39.720
<v Speaker 1>DeShawn Jackson season is over, Gil he was. I believe

0:37:39.800 --> 0:37:43.200
<v Speaker 1>he was placed on i R earlier this week, man um,

0:37:43.680 --> 0:37:48.400
<v Speaker 1>but al Jon Jeffrey it seems to be trending correctly though. Uh.

0:37:48.560 --> 0:37:51.600
<v Speaker 1>He was he actually was limited in practice yesterday. Same

0:37:51.680 --> 0:37:56.280
<v Speaker 1>deal with Jordan Howard. Uh. The only non participants yesterday

0:37:56.320 --> 0:37:59.560
<v Speaker 1>were Lane Johnson, who's in concussion protocol, and Nelson agal

0:37:59.680 --> 0:38:02.000
<v Speaker 1>Or was a knee injury. Thank you for that, Jeff.

0:38:02.560 --> 0:38:05.240
<v Speaker 1>I missed all of that while a massive pulmonary embolism

0:38:05.360 --> 0:38:07.640
<v Speaker 1>was being shot out of my my lungs. The the

0:38:07.880 --> 0:38:10.320
<v Speaker 1>Lane Johnson think is interesting though, right because the Eagles

0:38:10.480 --> 0:38:13.880
<v Speaker 1>Patriots game, you can kind of trace that game changing

0:38:14.080 --> 0:38:17.520
<v Speaker 1>on Lane Johnson's exit from that game was tending nothing Eagles.

0:38:18.160 --> 0:38:21.160
<v Speaker 1>Lane Johnson went out final score in New England's seventeen

0:38:21.680 --> 0:38:24.760
<v Speaker 1>Eagles ten. And we've had Lane Johnson's stats in previous

0:38:24.880 --> 0:38:26.680
<v Speaker 1>years in and out of lineup, so it's not like

0:38:26.760 --> 0:38:29.440
<v Speaker 1>it's just that one game with him. So that's big.

0:38:29.520 --> 0:38:31.239
<v Speaker 1>We'll see if he gets out of protocol or not.

0:38:31.920 --> 0:38:34.560
<v Speaker 1>Jeff big number three. Al right, Gil, I'm going to

0:38:34.719 --> 0:38:37.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to agree with your first pick here and

0:38:37.440 --> 0:38:39.759
<v Speaker 1>take the Miami Dolphins with the ten and a hook.

0:38:40.120 --> 0:38:43.200
<v Speaker 1>How is Freddie Kitchen a Freddie Kitchens coach team favored

0:38:43.200 --> 0:38:46.680
<v Speaker 1>by double digits against Eddie National Football League team? That's

0:38:46.800 --> 0:38:49.040
<v Speaker 1>that's the question I'll ask here. Even when they play

0:38:49.080 --> 0:38:51.719
<v Speaker 1>a Bengals in a few weeks, they should not be

0:38:51.840 --> 0:38:55.120
<v Speaker 1>favored by double digits. Miami has been playing better. I

0:38:55.400 --> 0:38:58.360
<v Speaker 1>know they never were in cover range last week against Buffalo,

0:38:58.840 --> 0:39:00.520
<v Speaker 1>but they still were compet it if they had a

0:39:00.560 --> 0:39:02.879
<v Speaker 1>two point conversion to get down eight in the fourth

0:39:02.960 --> 0:39:05.560
<v Speaker 1>quarter that they didn't convert in the Buffalo went right

0:39:05.600 --> 0:39:07.279
<v Speaker 1>down the field to end the end that game and

0:39:07.360 --> 0:39:10.160
<v Speaker 1>winning by sevent team. But the Dolphins have at least

0:39:10.239 --> 0:39:14.320
<v Speaker 1>resembled a National Football League team now since there, since

0:39:14.400 --> 0:39:17.719
<v Speaker 1>that game against Washington when they put Fitzpatrick back in

0:39:18.200 --> 0:39:21.000
<v Speaker 1>in the second half and something that Mike said a

0:39:21.080 --> 0:39:24.680
<v Speaker 1>few weeks ago, but he's not wrong. Um Brian Flores

0:39:24.920 --> 0:39:28.000
<v Speaker 1>has has done a tremendous job down there to get

0:39:28.080 --> 0:39:30.800
<v Speaker 1>that team that is has a roster that's not built

0:39:30.840 --> 0:39:33.000
<v Speaker 1>to win and not built to win for a while.

0:39:33.160 --> 0:39:37.400
<v Speaker 1>Now has them playing hard, has them competitive, and there's

0:39:37.480 --> 0:39:39.440
<v Speaker 1>no they should be able to lose this game by

0:39:39.480 --> 0:39:42.279
<v Speaker 1>a touchdown. It wouldn't shock me if if Cleveland has

0:39:42.360 --> 0:39:44.440
<v Speaker 1>dumb enough to lose this game out right. Is a

0:39:44.520 --> 0:39:46.799
<v Speaker 1>ten and a half point favorite at home. So I'm

0:39:46.840 --> 0:39:48.719
<v Speaker 1>with you, Gil on the Dolphins plus ten and a

0:39:48.760 --> 0:39:50.640
<v Speaker 1>half for my third one this week, all right, I

0:39:50.760 --> 0:39:53.879
<v Speaker 1>like it. Jeff's number three and my number one matchup, Mikey,

0:39:54.000 --> 0:39:56.320
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna make another play that's against the team and

0:39:56.440 --> 0:39:59.360
<v Speaker 1>not on a team. I'm gonna take Daniel Jones and

0:39:59.440 --> 0:40:03.239
<v Speaker 1>the New York Football Giants and six points going to

0:40:03.440 --> 0:40:08.640
<v Speaker 1>Soldier Field against this hapless Bears offense that lacks quarterback play,

0:40:08.800 --> 0:40:11.520
<v Speaker 1>that lacks the running game, and lacks a professional field

0:40:11.560 --> 0:40:15.360
<v Speaker 1>goal kicker. Uhs. At this point, I don't know. I

0:40:15.480 --> 0:40:17.760
<v Speaker 1>just don't know that the Bear should really be favored

0:40:17.840 --> 0:40:22.279
<v Speaker 1>over anybody other than Dwayne Haskins by six points. I mean, yes,

0:40:22.400 --> 0:40:25.080
<v Speaker 1>their their defense is still amongst the top six or

0:40:25.160 --> 0:40:29.719
<v Speaker 1>seven defenses in the league. But I mean, I personally

0:40:29.800 --> 0:40:32.520
<v Speaker 1>don't believe that there was some serious hip injury that

0:40:32.640 --> 0:40:36.440
<v Speaker 1>Mitchell Trobinsky suffered late in the fourth quarter that left

0:40:36.600 --> 0:40:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Naggy to pull him out. I don't under there wouldn't

0:40:39.480 --> 0:40:41.879
<v Speaker 1>have been a need for this emotional conversation to put

0:40:42.000 --> 0:40:44.160
<v Speaker 1>chase Daniel and with two and a half minutes and

0:40:44.200 --> 0:40:46.000
<v Speaker 1>go and tell him keep in bound so the clock

0:40:46.120 --> 0:40:49.560
<v Speaker 1>runs out. Um, it's just too much. I don't know

0:40:49.680 --> 0:40:52.359
<v Speaker 1>that the Bears are gonna score much more than six points.

0:40:52.440 --> 0:40:54.399
<v Speaker 1>I know the Giants secondary is bad, but you don't

0:40:54.400 --> 0:40:56.880
<v Speaker 1>have a quarterback that can take advantage of it. So

0:40:57.160 --> 0:40:59.200
<v Speaker 1>just too many points. I'll take the six. I had

0:40:59.239 --> 0:41:01.960
<v Speaker 1>no argument with him. Strabiskuite practice and full yesterday. He's

0:41:02.080 --> 0:41:04.600
<v Speaker 1>day to day, though officially listed as day to day.

0:41:05.320 --> 0:41:08.839
<v Speaker 1>My third pick was a toss up. Ultimately came down

0:41:08.960 --> 0:41:11.320
<v Speaker 1>to a couple of games, one of which was Baltimore

0:41:11.400 --> 0:41:13.880
<v Speaker 1>minus three against the Rams on the road on Monday night.

0:41:13.960 --> 0:41:16.120
<v Speaker 1>I decided not to make that play, even though that

0:41:16.280 --> 0:41:18.480
<v Speaker 1>was the uh my first cut. I am taking the

0:41:18.520 --> 0:41:23.279
<v Speaker 1>Atlanta Falcons giving four at home against the Tampa Bay Buccaneers.

0:41:24.080 --> 0:41:26.200
<v Speaker 1>High total in this game Todd's over on the game.

0:41:26.200 --> 0:41:27.680
<v Speaker 1>I think it's even higher than that. I agree with

0:41:27.719 --> 0:41:29.680
<v Speaker 1>Todd on that. And whenever you have high games like these,

0:41:30.480 --> 0:41:33.640
<v Speaker 1>I total score games that is, then the scores tend

0:41:33.680 --> 0:41:38.600
<v Speaker 1>to be volatile. I really believe in the Falcons transformation here.

0:41:38.640 --> 0:41:41.960
<v Speaker 1>On defense, they have outscored opponents here in the last

0:41:42.040 --> 0:41:46.640
<v Speaker 1>two games fifty hold on fifty five to twelve, fifty

0:41:46.680 --> 0:41:49.319
<v Speaker 1>five to twelve. That was against the Saints and last

0:41:49.360 --> 0:41:53.120
<v Speaker 1>week against Carolina, So they really shut down Drew Brees

0:41:53.160 --> 0:41:56.200
<v Speaker 1>and remember that game was just at the time, mind boggling.

0:41:56.840 --> 0:41:59.920
<v Speaker 1>And Carolina last week they were plus four in turn

0:42:00.000 --> 0:42:02.319
<v Speaker 1>and overs. They have been nothing short of dominant. They

0:42:02.320 --> 0:42:04.400
<v Speaker 1>have not yielded to touchdown, just four field goals in

0:42:04.400 --> 0:42:06.759
<v Speaker 1>the last two weeks. And Matt Ryan does Matt Ryan things.

0:42:07.360 --> 0:42:10.200
<v Speaker 1>Thirty one last week for three eleven, one touchdown, note picks,

0:42:10.200 --> 0:42:12.520
<v Speaker 1>sack three times. Calvin Ridley was his big target eight

0:42:12.600 --> 0:42:15.600
<v Speaker 1>for one forty three and a touchdown. Julio is still there.

0:42:16.040 --> 0:42:17.920
<v Speaker 1>And then there's Tampa Bay and here's there was a

0:42:17.960 --> 0:42:20.520
<v Speaker 1>quote from Mike will Mike Evans, who, by the way,

0:42:20.600 --> 0:42:23.000
<v Speaker 1>is uncoverable. Let me just say that, but Mike Evans

0:42:23.120 --> 0:42:26.040
<v Speaker 1>last week after Tampa Bay's lost to the Saints, where

0:42:26.080 --> 0:42:29.880
<v Speaker 1>the Saints outgained the Bucks one to eleven while building

0:42:29.920 --> 0:42:31.960
<v Speaker 1>an early twenty to nothing lead, controlled the ball for

0:42:32.040 --> 0:42:34.239
<v Speaker 1>twenty of the games first twenty five minutes and they

0:42:34.320 --> 0:42:36.719
<v Speaker 1>ended up losing. They were minus four in turnovers. By

0:42:36.719 --> 0:42:38.480
<v Speaker 1>the way, they had four turnovers. There were minus four

0:42:38.480 --> 0:42:41.279
<v Speaker 1>in turnovers against New Orleans. They only had thirty six

0:42:41.360 --> 0:42:43.960
<v Speaker 1>rushing yards. Again, this weird thing last week where there

0:42:44.040 --> 0:42:45.960
<v Speaker 1>was a bunch of teams, even in defeat and in

0:42:46.080 --> 0:42:49.600
<v Speaker 1>victory like the Niners, who barely had any rushing yards.

0:42:49.680 --> 0:42:52.400
<v Speaker 1>It was the weirdest thing mass throughout the NFL. But

0:42:52.440 --> 0:42:54.480
<v Speaker 1>Mike Evans said after the game, and and this this

0:42:54.600 --> 0:42:57.680
<v Speaker 1>for some reason resonated with me as just the denial

0:42:57.880 --> 0:43:00.520
<v Speaker 1>that the Bucks are in. He said, quote, it's very frustrating.

0:43:00.560 --> 0:43:03.280
<v Speaker 1>We've got the players. It's never been about the players

0:43:03.280 --> 0:43:07.080
<v Speaker 1>since I've been here. It's just we've been very, very inconsistent.

0:43:07.760 --> 0:43:10.160
<v Speaker 1>And I just think about him saying that. I'm like, no, dude,

0:43:10.200 --> 0:43:14.120
<v Speaker 1>you're not inconsistent. You just don't have winning football players.

0:43:14.760 --> 0:43:18.040
<v Speaker 1>You may be, but your teammates are not. And you

0:43:18.080 --> 0:43:19.680
<v Speaker 1>know the fact that they had Vernon Hargraves and they

0:43:19.719 --> 0:43:21.280
<v Speaker 1>had to just get rid of him for not hustling,

0:43:21.480 --> 0:43:23.960
<v Speaker 1>Like that's a perfect example. You guys are just not

0:43:24.040 --> 0:43:26.600
<v Speaker 1>a winning organization. And Bruce Arians, for all the love

0:43:26.680 --> 0:43:29.799
<v Speaker 1>that he gets, I'm not sure he gets it either.

0:43:30.320 --> 0:43:34.000
<v Speaker 1>In Tampa Bay, I actually believe in the Falcons transformation.

0:43:34.080 --> 0:43:36.000
<v Speaker 1>I think this is more of the team they should

0:43:36.040 --> 0:43:37.440
<v Speaker 1>have been at the beginning of the year than the

0:43:37.520 --> 0:43:39.920
<v Speaker 1>team we were seeing early on. I will give the

0:43:40.040 --> 0:43:43.479
<v Speaker 1>four I will take the Falcons. God, well, I'm gonna

0:43:43.600 --> 0:43:47.399
<v Speaker 1>do something here based on the fact that I've seen

0:43:47.480 --> 0:43:50.640
<v Speaker 1>this pattern now where you get these backup quarterbacks and

0:43:50.719 --> 0:43:53.239
<v Speaker 1>they're able to, like, you know, hold things together with

0:43:53.360 --> 0:43:55.880
<v Speaker 1>duct tape for a week or two or three even,

0:43:56.360 --> 0:43:58.640
<v Speaker 1>and then they start to fall apart, like Logan Allen

0:43:58.680 --> 0:44:05.960
<v Speaker 1>and Carolina, and we've got another Alan Alan. Wait, what's

0:44:06.000 --> 0:44:11.200
<v Speaker 1>the guy's name in Carol, Kyle Allen? Whatever? Don't we

0:44:11.239 --> 0:44:13.239
<v Speaker 1>haven't don't we have enough Allan's already? By the way,

0:44:13.239 --> 0:44:15.520
<v Speaker 1>how did you come up with Logan of all names?

0:44:16.440 --> 0:44:18.399
<v Speaker 1>I don't know how I messed up his first name.

0:44:18.440 --> 0:44:23.000
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry, but the guy Alan in in Carolina has

0:44:23.200 --> 0:44:27.239
<v Speaker 1>seemed to fall from the heights of Heaven back down

0:44:27.320 --> 0:44:30.040
<v Speaker 1>to Earth, and I think the same thing may happen

0:44:30.120 --> 0:44:32.719
<v Speaker 1>to another Alan. I believe his name is Brandon Allen.

0:44:32.760 --> 0:44:34.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm right about that. I think I think it was

0:44:34.719 --> 0:44:39.880
<v Speaker 1>Mel Allen in this case. Mellow mellow quarterback the Denver

0:44:40.080 --> 0:44:45.960
<v Speaker 1>Flaccio Fangios and uh, you know, quietly, the Fangio Flaccio's

0:44:46.080 --> 0:44:49.719
<v Speaker 1>have covered five out of the last six games, and

0:44:49.880 --> 0:44:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I just have to say, there has to be a

0:44:51.719 --> 0:44:54.520
<v Speaker 1>Fannie pack sighting in the next game because he can't

0:44:54.600 --> 0:44:58.399
<v Speaker 1>cover six out of seven. Come on, Mr Fangio, Uh,

0:44:58.719 --> 0:45:02.399
<v Speaker 1>you know, I think that Minnesota. Denver really went in there,

0:45:02.560 --> 0:45:05.080
<v Speaker 1>was up twenty nothing at the half, and then just

0:45:05.280 --> 0:45:08.800
<v Speaker 1>poorly fell Apart to Mike's Hall of Fame team, the

0:45:08.840 --> 0:45:12.520
<v Speaker 1>Minnesota Vikings. We had a little argument about the Vikings

0:45:12.560 --> 0:45:15.520
<v Speaker 1>on a Numbers game this week. I contend the quarterback

0:45:15.640 --> 0:45:20.840
<v Speaker 1>is still Kurt Cousins and he's not very good. I

0:45:21.280 --> 0:45:25.840
<v Speaker 1>hurt his cousins anyways. Uh, Mr Cousins is not very good. Anyways.

0:45:25.880 --> 0:45:29.200
<v Speaker 1>Here's the deal. Denver was up twenty to nothing against Minnesota.

0:45:29.520 --> 0:45:31.719
<v Speaker 1>I feel like they really, you know, we're all in

0:45:31.880 --> 0:45:35.240
<v Speaker 1>on that, and then blow the game. Uh. They haven't

0:45:35.320 --> 0:45:38.120
<v Speaker 1>had really a stinker in in four weeks since they

0:45:38.160 --> 0:45:41.680
<v Speaker 1>got whashed by Kansas City. They played well at Indianapolis,

0:45:42.000 --> 0:45:44.440
<v Speaker 1>they beat Cleveland, and then they played that great game

0:45:44.480 --> 0:45:47.280
<v Speaker 1>in Minnesota where they almost had the upset but couldn't

0:45:47.320 --> 0:45:49.440
<v Speaker 1>pull it off. I feel like they're due for a

0:45:49.520 --> 0:45:53.680
<v Speaker 1>stinker and going into Buffalo with a backup quarterback named

0:45:53.719 --> 0:45:58.120
<v Speaker 1>Logan mel Brandon, I don't care what his first name is,

0:45:58.200 --> 0:46:00.960
<v Speaker 1>but his last name is Alan and he's from the Razorbacks.

0:46:01.080 --> 0:46:04.920
<v Speaker 1>I think he might have some trouble against your Buffalo Bills.

0:46:05.040 --> 0:46:09.080
<v Speaker 1>That Bill's defense is still pretty darn good. And uh,

0:46:09.239 --> 0:46:12.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, Josh Allen, he keeps getting it more and

0:46:12.239 --> 0:46:15.080
<v Speaker 1>more together week after week. He's tough to he's tough

0:46:15.120 --> 0:46:17.799
<v Speaker 1>to defense. You know, he beats you with his legs.

0:46:17.880 --> 0:46:19.920
<v Speaker 1>He could throw the ball a little bit. Give me

0:46:20.000 --> 0:46:23.600
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo Bills minus the four? Is that the correct number,

0:46:23.640 --> 0:46:26.600
<v Speaker 1>gil h That is correct at his minus four, sir,

0:46:26.800 --> 0:46:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Buffalo minus four? Alright, Logan Allen. By the way, a

0:46:29.640 --> 0:46:32.360
<v Speaker 1>quick Google search reveals that he's a pitcher in the

0:46:32.440 --> 0:46:36.880
<v Speaker 1>Indians organization previously, well previously in the Padres organization. He

0:46:37.000 --> 0:46:38.480
<v Speaker 1>might be able to, he might be able to come

0:46:38.520 --> 0:46:42.200
<v Speaker 1>in for you know, a quarter, Logan Allen. Maybe Dick

0:46:42.239 --> 0:46:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Allen maybe maybe more likely. The Broncos first team since

0:46:46.160 --> 0:46:48.480
<v Speaker 1>to not score a fourth quarter touchdown in six straight games.

0:46:48.520 --> 0:46:50.719
<v Speaker 1>They had three cracks at it with ten seconds left

0:46:50.960 --> 0:46:53.200
<v Speaker 1>against the Vikings last week. Because Mike Zimmer and all

0:46:53.239 --> 0:46:55.920
<v Speaker 1>his infinite wisdom, with chaos and the Broncos having no

0:46:56.080 --> 0:46:58.440
<v Speaker 1>time outs and the clock running decides, you know what,

0:46:58.520 --> 0:47:00.040
<v Speaker 1>I'll call it time out and let them work and

0:47:00.120 --> 0:47:02.719
<v Speaker 1>eyes so they get three shots at this. Like, I

0:47:02.760 --> 0:47:05.320
<v Speaker 1>don't think enough was made of that gaff. Everyone's like,

0:47:05.360 --> 0:47:09.799
<v Speaker 1>whot Detroit the exact same thing, and they're like, oh,

0:47:09.880 --> 0:47:12.239
<v Speaker 1>they could have been called for pass interference? Who they

0:47:12.239 --> 0:47:14.160
<v Speaker 1>could have been this? How about not calling the time

0:47:14.239 --> 0:47:17.080
<v Speaker 1>out like that? That to me was the biggest thing

0:47:17.120 --> 0:47:19.160
<v Speaker 1>in that. But the Vikings dual race the twenty to

0:47:19.239 --> 0:47:21.680
<v Speaker 1>nothing half time deficit touchdowns on each of their first

0:47:21.719 --> 0:47:25.040
<v Speaker 1>four drives. In the second half, Kirk Cousins uh mr

0:47:25.160 --> 0:47:28.480
<v Speaker 1>Wishnev was twenty nine of thirty five for three nineteen

0:47:28.520 --> 0:47:31.600
<v Speaker 1>three touchdowns. Note Pixy was sacked five times. Uh Stefon

0:47:31.680 --> 0:47:33.560
<v Speaker 1>Diggs was big target five or one twenty and one

0:47:33.600 --> 0:47:36.000
<v Speaker 1>in a touchdown. According to sport Radar, it was only

0:47:36.080 --> 0:47:39.000
<v Speaker 1>the fourteenth time in the history of the National Football

0:47:39.080 --> 0:47:42.720
<v Speaker 1>League that a twenty plus point halftime lead turned into defeat.

0:47:43.000 --> 0:47:44.759
<v Speaker 1>By the way. That does not include by the way

0:47:44.880 --> 0:47:47.719
<v Speaker 1>span of a hundred games including the playoffs, since it

0:47:47.800 --> 0:47:50.520
<v Speaker 1>happened the last time, first time in five years, does

0:47:50.600 --> 0:47:54.239
<v Speaker 1>not include well, the real last time it happened, but

0:47:54.320 --> 0:47:57.279
<v Speaker 1>it wasn't. A twenty plus point halftime lead was the

0:47:57.320 --> 0:47:59.440
<v Speaker 1>Super Bowl between the Patriots and the Falcon. So these

0:47:59.520 --> 0:48:03.040
<v Speaker 1>is really only describing the regular well this is really

0:48:03.080 --> 0:48:06.240
<v Speaker 1>only described me specifically twenty point halftime deficits. But remember

0:48:06.280 --> 0:48:11.040
<v Speaker 1>in that game, New England was down eighteen point. They

0:48:11.080 --> 0:48:12.960
<v Speaker 1>were down eighteen points at the half, and then it

0:48:13.080 --> 0:48:15.839
<v Speaker 1>got to to three and they came all the way back.

0:48:15.880 --> 0:48:17.759
<v Speaker 1>But it gives you an indication, just so we can

0:48:17.800 --> 0:48:21.640
<v Speaker 1>appreciate it one more time. How amazing that Patriots comeback

0:48:21.760 --> 0:48:25.160
<v Speaker 1>was against the Falcons. It just doesn't happen, you know.

0:48:25.760 --> 0:48:28.400
<v Speaker 1>Uh So this was only fourteen such instance of this

0:48:28.600 --> 0:48:31.680
<v Speaker 1>particular thing happening. And again the Vikings were held to

0:48:31.719 --> 0:48:33.600
<v Speaker 1>thirty seven yards rushing. And you can say, well they

0:48:33.640 --> 0:48:36.000
<v Speaker 1>were down twenty to nothing, Gil, but you still have

0:48:36.160 --> 0:48:38.080
<v Speaker 1>Dalvin Cook and you still have the whole half. So

0:48:38.200 --> 0:48:39.719
<v Speaker 1>I get it. You don't go to the running game

0:48:39.719 --> 0:48:43.600
<v Speaker 1>as much, but to abandon it completely is a very

0:48:43.680 --> 0:48:48.400
<v Speaker 1>interesting thing. It happened all over the league last week. Alright, gentlemen,

0:48:48.719 --> 0:48:51.719
<v Speaker 1>teaser of the week, everybody, before you go on to

0:48:51.800 --> 0:48:54.560
<v Speaker 1>the teasers. I don't like those stats where people go, oh,

0:48:54.640 --> 0:48:57.640
<v Speaker 1>they abandoned, right, you know who abandons runs and passes

0:48:57.680 --> 0:49:00.520
<v Speaker 1>all the time. Yes, that's right, Billy Belloch. He doesn't

0:49:00.560 --> 0:49:03.520
<v Speaker 1>care about that nonsense. He just matches his guys up

0:49:03.560 --> 0:49:06.160
<v Speaker 1>against Urin's guys and he beats you. Yeah, but the

0:49:06.239 --> 0:49:08.440
<v Speaker 1>other guys aren't doing what Bill Belichick is doing, so

0:49:08.560 --> 0:49:11.560
<v Speaker 1>that's a false comeback. They're not doing it the way

0:49:11.600 --> 0:49:13.480
<v Speaker 1>that Belichick is doing. They're not going, oh, yes, I'm

0:49:13.520 --> 0:49:15.000
<v Speaker 1>going to beat the best thing on the other team.

0:49:15.000 --> 0:49:16.680
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to do this. I'm gonna do that. These

0:49:16.719 --> 0:49:21.160
<v Speaker 1>other guys aren't that smart. They should Well, that's different.

0:49:21.200 --> 0:49:25.040
<v Speaker 1>Time should as different. Alright, Teaser of the week. Everybody

0:49:25.120 --> 0:49:27.600
<v Speaker 1>knows I'm gonna catch Todd, so everybody's waiting for my teaser.

0:49:27.840 --> 0:49:30.480
<v Speaker 1>No one's waiting for Todd's. Jeff, we start with viewers.

0:49:33.760 --> 0:49:36.520
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna go with the Dolphins and the Giants. Gil.

0:49:36.800 --> 0:49:39.640
<v Speaker 1>Put put Miami up the sixteen and a half. Put

0:49:39.719 --> 0:49:43.200
<v Speaker 1>the Giants up to twelve. Gil, when I'm guessing lines

0:49:43.239 --> 0:49:45.000
<v Speaker 1>on Monday, what did I say to you about the

0:49:45.040 --> 0:49:47.040
<v Speaker 1>Bears being as big of a favorite as they were

0:49:47.440 --> 0:49:49.239
<v Speaker 1>on your guests when you guess six and a half,

0:49:49.360 --> 0:49:53.120
<v Speaker 1>My word was, that's gross. I don't think that. I

0:49:53.160 --> 0:49:55.320
<v Speaker 1>don't think the Bears have a chance of winning this

0:49:55.440 --> 0:49:58.399
<v Speaker 1>game by two touchdowns. So I like the Giants plus

0:49:58.520 --> 0:50:01.520
<v Speaker 1>the twelve, and I I like Miami ten and a half,

0:50:01.600 --> 0:50:03.439
<v Speaker 1>So why wouldn't I like them sixteen and a half.

0:50:03.480 --> 0:50:06.120
<v Speaker 1>So that's what I'll go with here. Mike Palmetto, Well,

0:50:06.360 --> 0:50:10.439
<v Speaker 1>despite a really tough spot for the Raiders, I'm gonna

0:50:10.480 --> 0:50:13.320
<v Speaker 1>tease them up to eight and a half. I know that.

0:50:13.440 --> 0:50:18.160
<v Speaker 1>It's how do you tease? They're the favorite? They're the favorite? Oh,

0:50:18.360 --> 0:50:20.879
<v Speaker 1>they're the favorite. Didn't this happen last week too? Yeah?

0:50:20.960 --> 0:50:23.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it did happen this week. It did happen

0:50:23.800 --> 0:50:28.359
<v Speaker 1>as well. Okay, uh, scratch debt. Okay, let me let

0:50:28.440 --> 0:50:31.759
<v Speaker 1>me substitute Parley's Giants at twelve. There then, for the

0:50:31.840 --> 0:50:35.399
<v Speaker 1>reasons already stated, because I gave the argument. Now, I'm

0:50:35.440 --> 0:50:39.040
<v Speaker 1>gonna take the Packers and I do this Todd and

0:50:39.120 --> 0:50:44.319
<v Speaker 1>tease them up to nine and a half. Nine, okay, nine?

0:50:44.800 --> 0:50:49.200
<v Speaker 1>All right? I think that we uh, and everybody's haste

0:50:49.239 --> 0:50:52.600
<v Speaker 1>to say the forty niners, Uh, we're better than we

0:50:52.680 --> 0:50:55.680
<v Speaker 1>thought they were. We have to consider the injuries, especially

0:50:55.719 --> 0:50:57.520
<v Speaker 1>on the offensive side of the ball, to a young

0:50:57.600 --> 0:51:01.640
<v Speaker 1>quarterback not having targets like Sanders and Kittle. I just

0:51:01.760 --> 0:51:04.600
<v Speaker 1>think that although I hate the Packers defense, I think

0:51:04.640 --> 0:51:06.880
<v Speaker 1>that the you know, this game is so big in

0:51:07.040 --> 0:51:10.480
<v Speaker 1>terms of playoff implications, in terms of seeding, in terms

0:51:10.520 --> 0:51:12.759
<v Speaker 1>of you know, really from being a one to a

0:51:12.840 --> 0:51:15.600
<v Speaker 1>two to a five seed UH in these in these

0:51:15.680 --> 0:51:19.200
<v Speaker 1>races in the NFC that San Francisco UH is not

0:51:19.280 --> 0:51:22.080
<v Speaker 1>going to route the Packers in this game. I think

0:51:22.120 --> 0:51:24.080
<v Speaker 1>this is a close game. I think either team can

0:51:24.160 --> 0:51:26.120
<v Speaker 1>win this game. It's a one score game, so we'll

0:51:26.160 --> 0:51:28.440
<v Speaker 1>pick it up to nine. For me, it is New

0:51:28.520 --> 0:51:32.520
<v Speaker 1>England and Green Bay. Green Bay, you know, look nine

0:51:32.560 --> 0:51:35.759
<v Speaker 1>points against these Niners. I'm not sold on Jimmy Garoppolo.

0:51:35.880 --> 0:51:38.520
<v Speaker 1>One week he looks great, another he doesn't. By the way,

0:51:38.600 --> 0:51:41.000
<v Speaker 1>in games, he has moments where he looks great, and

0:51:41.040 --> 0:51:42.840
<v Speaker 1>then I'm like, oh my god, they're never doing anything

0:51:42.920 --> 0:51:45.279
<v Speaker 1>with this guy. But you can be nine points with

0:51:45.360 --> 0:51:47.720
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay. I will take that happily. The New England

0:51:47.800 --> 0:51:49.719
<v Speaker 1>thing for me, which is basically just taking it down

0:51:49.760 --> 0:51:51.880
<v Speaker 1>to a pick them really a half point. But New

0:51:51.920 --> 0:51:56.160
<v Speaker 1>England for me is this is such the mismatch of

0:51:56.320 --> 0:51:59.120
<v Speaker 1>coaching and as we've said many times on a numbers game.

0:51:59.120 --> 0:52:01.480
<v Speaker 1>As we said many times, I'm beating the book podcast.

0:52:02.040 --> 0:52:04.640
<v Speaker 1>If you could only have one NFL handicapping tool at

0:52:04.680 --> 0:52:07.920
<v Speaker 1>your disposal, let it be your coach's power rankings. This

0:52:08.160 --> 0:52:12.360
<v Speaker 1>is Bill Belichick against the brain trust that is Jason

0:52:12.400 --> 0:52:15.840
<v Speaker 1>Garrett and Kellen Moore. I'm sorry, you're just in a

0:52:15.960 --> 0:52:19.319
<v Speaker 1>tease that's just to pick him all day, every day,

0:52:19.600 --> 0:52:24.040
<v Speaker 1>New England along with the Packers Stanford. I don't know

0:52:24.160 --> 0:52:26.920
<v Speaker 1>if you noticed this, but I was watching, you know what.

0:52:27.040 --> 0:52:29.360
<v Speaker 1>We get to the South Point early to try to

0:52:29.440 --> 0:52:31.880
<v Speaker 1>save seats for people. You know, Jeff Parls has always

0:52:31.920 --> 0:52:33.359
<v Speaker 1>asked me, can you save me a seat? And then

0:52:33.680 --> 0:52:35.080
<v Speaker 1>r J wants me to save him a seat, and

0:52:35.080 --> 0:52:37.080
<v Speaker 1>then Miguel wants me. It's like a million people. So

0:52:37.160 --> 0:52:39.600
<v Speaker 1>I get there early to try to save seats, and

0:52:39.680 --> 0:52:42.640
<v Speaker 1>I'm watching the pregame shows, you know, while I'm trying

0:52:42.680 --> 0:52:45.080
<v Speaker 1>to decide last minute things if I want to do anything,

0:52:45.520 --> 0:52:47.320
<v Speaker 1>and there's a you know how, like they have the

0:52:47.400 --> 0:52:50.439
<v Speaker 1>feeds from all the different games. They're right, and they've

0:52:50.520 --> 0:52:55.160
<v Speaker 1>got Garrett on the sidelines. He's throwing the football around

0:52:55.239 --> 0:52:57.920
<v Speaker 1>like he's at the park on a Sunday afternoon and

0:52:58.000 --> 0:53:00.600
<v Speaker 1>I'm thinking to myself, and he's literally doing this for like,

0:53:01.040 --> 0:53:03.239
<v Speaker 1>you know, three or four minutes. He's like throwing it

0:53:03.320 --> 0:53:05.760
<v Speaker 1>like he's gonna be the starting quarterback. And I'm thinking,

0:53:06.120 --> 0:53:08.600
<v Speaker 1>you know, twenty five minutes before the game, this is

0:53:08.680 --> 0:53:11.880
<v Speaker 1>what you're doing. I can't see Belichick throwing the ball around.

0:53:12.160 --> 0:53:13.840
<v Speaker 1>He would be like, you know, coming up with his

0:53:14.000 --> 0:53:17.640
<v Speaker 1>last second offensive lineman, blocking schemes, coming up with great

0:53:17.680 --> 0:53:20.520
<v Speaker 1>special teams plays or something. This guy's throwing the ball

0:53:20.600 --> 0:53:22.880
<v Speaker 1>around like he's in the park. I couldn't believe it.

0:53:22.960 --> 0:53:24.919
<v Speaker 1>I was really shocked by the way. Did you see

0:53:24.920 --> 0:53:26.920
<v Speaker 1>the field? Yates? Before I get off the Patriots for

0:53:26.960 --> 0:53:29.120
<v Speaker 1>a second and the Cowboys? Did you see the field?

0:53:29.239 --> 0:53:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Yates tweet earlier this week the active number of consecutive

0:53:32.480 --> 0:53:35.680
<v Speaker 1>winning seasons for NFL team, So he basically just goes

0:53:35.920 --> 0:53:39.080
<v Speaker 1>zero to nineteen. He just scrolls it down on a tweet,

0:53:39.800 --> 0:53:47.120
<v Speaker 1>and some active number of consecutive winning seasons zero Arizona, Atlanta, Carolina, Buffalo, Cincinnati, Cleveland, Denver, Detroit,

0:53:47.200 --> 0:53:50.480
<v Speaker 1>Green Bay, Jacksonville, Miami Giants, Jets, Oakland, Tampa Bay, Washington,

0:53:50.560 --> 0:53:54.080
<v Speaker 1>all coming off losing seasons. How many people have one

0:53:54.280 --> 0:53:57.360
<v Speaker 1>winning season currently and are trying to get to Chicago, Houston,

0:53:57.400 --> 0:54:00.719
<v Speaker 1>Indianapolis and San Francisco. How many have two or have

0:54:00.840 --> 0:54:04.000
<v Speaker 1>gotten to two this year that's also a possibility. Uh, Baltimore,

0:54:04.239 --> 0:54:07.600
<v Speaker 1>the Chargers, the Rams, the Vikings, the Saints, and the Eagles.

0:54:07.640 --> 0:54:09.759
<v Speaker 1>All right, how many have gotten to three? By the way,

0:54:10.320 --> 0:54:13.040
<v Speaker 1>we've we've just got to to There are only six

0:54:13.160 --> 0:54:16.400
<v Speaker 1>teams left in the NFL, so that we haven't mentioned

0:54:16.480 --> 0:54:20.359
<v Speaker 1>so far. Three Dallas and Tennessee. Dallas and Tennessee, which

0:54:20.440 --> 0:54:23.560
<v Speaker 1>might surprise some people, have three consecutive winning seats. We'll

0:54:23.600 --> 0:54:26.600
<v Speaker 1>have four teams left. We skipped four. Pittsburgh has had

0:54:26.680 --> 0:54:30.920
<v Speaker 1>five consecutive winning seasons, that's in jeopardy. Kansas City has

0:54:30.960 --> 0:54:36.279
<v Speaker 1>had six consecutive winning seasons, Seattle has had seven consecutive

0:54:36.320 --> 0:54:38.759
<v Speaker 1>winning seasons, and then you have to go all the

0:54:38.880 --> 0:54:44.880
<v Speaker 1>way to nineteen. For the Patriots. It's just unbelievable. The

0:54:45.040 --> 0:54:48.160
<v Speaker 1>difference between them and every other franchise in this league.

0:54:48.200 --> 0:54:51.279
<v Speaker 1>Just another way to put it in context. From field eight.

0:54:51.320 --> 0:54:53.880
<v Speaker 1>So I thought that was a great tweet from him. Anyway,

0:54:53.920 --> 0:54:57.520
<v Speaker 1>go ahead, that is pretty astounding, especially, I mean, they've

0:54:57.560 --> 0:55:00.040
<v Speaker 1>only been able to change the footballs for the for

0:55:00.120 --> 0:55:02.440
<v Speaker 1>the first fifteen of those seasons, So you know that

0:55:02.560 --> 0:55:04.880
<v Speaker 1>is pretty incredible. Da've been, you know, keep the street

0:55:04.880 --> 0:55:07.120
<v Speaker 1>going for the last four years. What's your teaser, Tidy,

0:55:08.160 --> 0:55:10.600
<v Speaker 1>My teaser is Green Bay as well. I am with

0:55:10.800 --> 0:55:14.200
<v Speaker 1>you a thousands with this Jimmy G nonsense. I think

0:55:14.280 --> 0:55:18.320
<v Speaker 1>he's good, but he's a little too uh interception prone,

0:55:18.400 --> 0:55:21.160
<v Speaker 1>fumble prone. He scares the bit Jesus out of me

0:55:21.239 --> 0:55:23.360
<v Speaker 1>every time he goes back to path. You know, in

0:55:23.440 --> 0:55:26.160
<v Speaker 1>the the offensive line sometimes has problems and you can

0:55:26.239 --> 0:55:28.680
<v Speaker 1>take some big hits. So I'm not a hundred percent

0:55:28.800 --> 0:55:31.680
<v Speaker 1>I think we'll have to be considering betting against Jimmy

0:55:31.719 --> 0:55:33.879
<v Speaker 1>G in the playoffs. And so give me Green Bay

0:55:33.920 --> 0:55:36.520
<v Speaker 1>plus the nine. And then in the other one, I'm

0:55:36.520 --> 0:55:39.279
<v Speaker 1>gonna go with Indie plus nine and a half, just

0:55:39.440 --> 0:55:42.440
<v Speaker 1>because this feels like a Bill O'Brien ish game that

0:55:42.520 --> 0:55:44.600
<v Speaker 1>will be tight, you know, all the way to the end,

0:55:44.680 --> 0:55:46.680
<v Speaker 1>and so I'll take the nine and a half. Alright,

0:55:46.760 --> 0:55:49.160
<v Speaker 1>final two questions, Speed round, gentleman, because Mike Palm's got

0:55:49.239 --> 0:55:51.800
<v Speaker 1>a roll and there's only four examples of games that

0:55:51.960 --> 0:55:55.200
<v Speaker 1>have spread larger than four points this week, So it's

0:55:55.280 --> 0:55:57.800
<v Speaker 1>very tight. Here are your choices. What is the biggest

0:55:57.960 --> 0:56:00.759
<v Speaker 1>favorite most likely to lose? Cleveland ten and a half

0:56:00.800 --> 0:56:04.399
<v Speaker 1>point favorites against Miami, New Orleans nine and a half

0:56:04.520 --> 0:56:07.320
<v Speaker 1>or ten point favorites at home against Caroline. I might allied.

0:56:07.360 --> 0:56:10.440
<v Speaker 1>It might be five examples. Chicago six point favorites at

0:56:10.480 --> 0:56:13.279
<v Speaker 1>home against the Giants, Pittsburgh six and a half point

0:56:13.320 --> 0:56:16.480
<v Speaker 1>favorites on the road against the Cincinnati Bungles in New

0:56:16.520 --> 0:56:18.440
<v Speaker 1>England six and a half point favorites at home against

0:56:18.480 --> 0:56:21.080
<v Speaker 1>the Dallas Cowboys. Jeff most likely to lose outright. Of

0:56:21.120 --> 0:56:25.440
<v Speaker 1>those favorites, These Chicago Bears are the most likely of

0:56:25.560 --> 0:56:27.880
<v Speaker 1>that group to lose out right for all the reasons

0:56:27.960 --> 0:56:31.600
<v Speaker 1>we've already stated. They stink on offense, and as long

0:56:31.640 --> 0:56:34.839
<v Speaker 1>as Daniel Jones doesn't throw a pick six in this game,

0:56:34.920 --> 0:56:36.600
<v Speaker 1>the Giants are gonna have a shot at the end.

0:56:36.920 --> 0:56:38.440
<v Speaker 1>So I think to win this game, so I'll go

0:56:38.480 --> 0:56:40.759
<v Speaker 1>to Bears. Have we lost Mike Pom I don't know. No,

0:56:40.960 --> 0:56:44.279
<v Speaker 1>we might have lost Mikey. Mikey might have bounced. He's

0:56:44.400 --> 0:56:46.680
<v Speaker 1>you want me to do pick for him? Yeah, let's

0:56:46.719 --> 0:56:51.560
<v Speaker 1>go do Mike Gonna go with the Vancouver Canucks likely

0:56:51.719 --> 0:56:56.400
<v Speaker 1>to lose tonight. I'm just kidding. We hit the We

0:56:56.480 --> 0:56:57.840
<v Speaker 1>hit the wall with Mike, so we might have had

0:56:57.880 --> 0:57:00.120
<v Speaker 1>to bounce out at the end. My pick, by well,

0:57:00.120 --> 0:57:02.080
<v Speaker 1>you'll go ahead, Todd, you already started go ahead. My

0:57:02.280 --> 0:57:06.920
<v Speaker 1>pick is gonna be the Pittsburgh your Picksburg Stiller's my

0:57:07.160 --> 0:57:12.000
<v Speaker 1>Picksburgh Steelers have one problem. They're good on defense, but

0:57:12.480 --> 0:57:14.960
<v Speaker 1>they don't have a guy who can get the ball

0:57:15.040 --> 0:57:17.640
<v Speaker 1>snapped him. I believe they call that the quarterback. We

0:57:17.800 --> 0:57:20.960
<v Speaker 1>don't have a quarterback. And you know, no team wants

0:57:21.000 --> 0:57:23.960
<v Speaker 1>to go in sixteen in the NFL. This could be

0:57:24.080 --> 0:57:26.560
<v Speaker 1>the week that Cincinnati gets off the schneid. I could

0:57:26.600 --> 0:57:30.240
<v Speaker 1>see the Pittsburgh Steelers on the road losing this game. Um,

0:57:30.720 --> 0:57:35.920
<v Speaker 1>Miles Garrett now this morning claiming a racial slur from

0:57:35.960 --> 0:57:38.800
<v Speaker 1>Mason Rudolph. Did you see this? Parland and I on

0:57:38.960 --> 0:57:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Monday before Guessing Lines, we were talking about unless or

0:57:43.080 --> 0:57:46.240
<v Speaker 1>excuse me before the show on Friday morning, after the

0:57:46.400 --> 0:57:48.560
<v Speaker 1>after the game between the Browns and the Steelers the

0:57:48.600 --> 0:57:52.200
<v Speaker 1>previous night, we said, unless there was you know what stated.

0:57:53.000 --> 0:57:55.000
<v Speaker 1>There is no justification for what Miles Garrett did and

0:57:55.040 --> 0:57:56.360
<v Speaker 1>he should be suspended for the rest of the year,

0:57:56.360 --> 0:57:58.640
<v Speaker 1>including the postseason. And that's in fact what happened. There

0:57:58.720 --> 0:58:00.600
<v Speaker 1>was no mention of any rea and if they let

0:58:00.680 --> 0:58:04.760
<v Speaker 1>me finish, Dodd, Todd, let me finish. So here's the thing.

0:58:05.520 --> 0:58:08.840
<v Speaker 1>It wasn't stated then, right, But here we are now

0:58:08.960 --> 0:58:12.080
<v Speaker 1>a week later. A if Mason Rudolph in fact did

0:58:12.240 --> 0:58:13.800
<v Speaker 1>use the racial slur, let's all just get on the

0:58:13.840 --> 0:58:16.560
<v Speaker 1>same page and say, I get it. But would you

0:58:16.640 --> 0:58:19.360
<v Speaker 1>really wait a week? Would you really wait a week

0:58:19.440 --> 0:58:22.640
<v Speaker 1>to mention this? And if it's not the case that

0:58:22.800 --> 0:58:26.120
<v Speaker 1>Mason Rudolph actually didn't say it and you're lying about

0:58:26.160 --> 0:58:30.400
<v Speaker 1>it now, you should king be ashamed of yourself, Myles Garrett,

0:58:30.640 --> 0:58:33.400
<v Speaker 1>you really should. I don't know how you guys come

0:58:33.440 --> 0:58:35.040
<v Speaker 1>down on that. Todd. I'm sure you have something to

0:58:35.080 --> 0:58:36.640
<v Speaker 1>say because you wanted to say it two minutes ago.

0:58:36.840 --> 0:58:40.320
<v Speaker 1>I apologize for interrupting you, but you know the I

0:58:40.400 --> 0:58:43.800
<v Speaker 1>got I got out of control there. But you know, um,

0:58:44.440 --> 0:58:47.720
<v Speaker 1>here's the thing. You can call me any racial slur

0:58:47.880 --> 0:58:50.480
<v Speaker 1>that in the world, and racial slurs are terrible. You

0:58:50.520 --> 0:58:52.560
<v Speaker 1>can call me anything you want. I don't think I

0:58:52.600 --> 0:58:57.400
<v Speaker 1>would swing a helmet at somebody's head Okay, I don't

0:58:57.440 --> 0:58:59.760
<v Speaker 1>even but all I'm saying it doesn't look too wrong

0:58:59.760 --> 0:59:01.640
<v Speaker 1>with some right what I'm saying. At least in that

0:59:01.800 --> 0:59:05.160
<v Speaker 1>case you might understand what I'm trying to go. You're

0:59:05.200 --> 0:59:07.400
<v Speaker 1>making a good point. You're making a good point that

0:59:07.520 --> 0:59:09.480
<v Speaker 1>if he says something racial, the guy might lose his

0:59:09.560 --> 0:59:12.120
<v Speaker 1>mind and go crazy. But I still think we have

0:59:12.280 --> 0:59:15.240
<v Speaker 1>to have some kind of you know, control of ourselves

0:59:15.480 --> 0:59:19.400
<v Speaker 1>where we don't swing a helmet at somebody's head. I mean,

0:59:19.480 --> 0:59:23.120
<v Speaker 1>nothing could have killed. You could charge him for assault

0:59:23.200 --> 0:59:26.800
<v Speaker 1>and battery. Legit, he could, he really could. And and

0:59:26.920 --> 0:59:29.240
<v Speaker 1>then the other thing is to how late this comes out.

0:59:29.520 --> 0:59:32.080
<v Speaker 1>This feels like the late call when you're when you're

0:59:32.520 --> 0:59:35.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, playing pick up basketball, and you shoot and

0:59:35.200 --> 0:59:36.720
<v Speaker 1>you you wait to see if it goes in, and

0:59:36.760 --> 0:59:38.800
<v Speaker 1>then you decide whether to call the foul at the end.

0:59:39.080 --> 0:59:42.600
<v Speaker 1>You can't call for a racial slur seven days later.

0:59:43.200 --> 0:59:46.320
<v Speaker 1>I mean, that's just not cool, right, not cool if

0:59:46.360 --> 0:59:48.840
<v Speaker 1>it did not happen. By the way, my pick on this,

0:59:48.960 --> 0:59:50.800
<v Speaker 1>and you guys hit on my two top choices for this,

0:59:51.360 --> 0:59:53.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna lean with Jeff here. I am going to

0:59:53.600 --> 0:59:57.280
<v Speaker 1>say it's the Chicago Bears. I could see a scenario

0:59:57.400 --> 1:00:00.440
<v Speaker 1>where they lose that out right against the Giants largely

1:00:00.480 --> 1:00:02.360
<v Speaker 1>because of that your biskuy factor. And I agree with

1:00:02.520 --> 1:00:05.600
<v Speaker 1>Mike Palm there was no hip injury. To me. I

1:00:05.680 --> 1:00:08.120
<v Speaker 1>think he just needed to be benched. And I think

1:00:08.200 --> 1:00:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Matt Matt Naggi finally realized that last question. If we

1:00:12.440 --> 1:00:14.520
<v Speaker 1>lived in a bizarro world and we were forced to

1:00:14.560 --> 1:00:16.560
<v Speaker 1>bet aside on each and every one of these football

1:00:16.600 --> 1:00:19.240
<v Speaker 1>games in Week twelve in the National Football League, including

1:00:19.240 --> 1:00:21.720
<v Speaker 1>to night's game Thursday Night, but you were allowed one

1:00:21.840 --> 1:00:24.000
<v Speaker 1>free pass parlay, what would it be? What would you

1:00:24.080 --> 1:00:27.320
<v Speaker 1>not bet at all? Let's let's I'll pass on the

1:00:27.480 --> 1:00:30.080
<v Speaker 1>a f C South matchup that I'm surprised that it's

1:00:30.120 --> 1:00:32.520
<v Speaker 1>not on Thursday Night for the second time this year.

1:00:32.920 --> 1:00:36.680
<v Speaker 1>And jack and that's Jacksonville at Tennessee, UH Titans off

1:00:36.760 --> 1:00:40.640
<v Speaker 1>of by Jags off a bad performance against Indy Gil.

1:00:40.720 --> 1:00:42.960
<v Speaker 1>I have no clue what what either of these teams

1:00:43.040 --> 1:00:46.120
<v Speaker 1>truly are now that folds us back for Jacksonville and

1:00:46.200 --> 1:00:48.840
<v Speaker 1>the Tennessee is really in a bizarro world where Ryan

1:00:48.960 --> 1:00:52.360
<v Speaker 1>Tannehill actually has looked pretty competent the last three games.

1:00:52.760 --> 1:00:55.360
<v Speaker 1>So I want absolutely nothing to do with that AFC

1:00:55.480 --> 1:01:00.120
<v Speaker 1>South Battle one my pick as well, no clue, no reading.

1:01:00.560 --> 1:01:02.640
<v Speaker 1>That was the one guest on Monday where I'm going,

1:01:02.760 --> 1:01:04.520
<v Speaker 1>this has to be three, right, Chrissy, because there's just

1:01:04.640 --> 1:01:07.120
<v Speaker 1>nothing else you can make it, And he's like absolutely

1:01:07.360 --> 1:01:10.640
<v Speaker 1>whenever that game comes up. That's usually the answer to

1:01:10.680 --> 1:01:13.720
<v Speaker 1>this question, Todd, I think you guys have a good answer,

1:01:13.760 --> 1:01:17.040
<v Speaker 1>but I'll throw one other one out of Carolina New Orleans.

1:01:17.600 --> 1:01:20.040
<v Speaker 1>I don't know what I'm getting from Logan or Kyle

1:01:20.120 --> 1:01:23.240
<v Speaker 1>Allen and Um, you know, I so, I don't really

1:01:23.280 --> 1:01:25.720
<v Speaker 1>know at this point. You know, is it the is

1:01:25.760 --> 1:01:28.560
<v Speaker 1>it the Kyle Aland we saw early who seemed to

1:01:28.600 --> 1:01:30.480
<v Speaker 1>be able to keep it together, or is it the

1:01:30.560 --> 1:01:33.040
<v Speaker 1>Kyle Island we saw the last two weeks? You know what?

1:01:33.280 --> 1:01:34.680
<v Speaker 1>Is that? All? So? I want to I don't want

1:01:34.680 --> 1:01:37.400
<v Speaker 1>any part of that Carolina game. And one other thing,

1:01:37.720 --> 1:01:40.560
<v Speaker 1>the NFL could probably get a bulk rate on a

1:01:40.760 --> 1:01:43.680
<v Speaker 1>therapist or a team of therapist to both talk to

1:01:44.280 --> 1:01:48.400
<v Speaker 1>the entire San Diego l a Charger team along with

1:01:48.840 --> 1:01:53.160
<v Speaker 1>Mitchell Troubinsky and the two both of those guys, you know,

1:01:53.320 --> 1:01:55.920
<v Speaker 1>maybe it would just be Rivers and Traubinsky, Um and

1:01:56.120 --> 1:01:59.080
<v Speaker 1>you could do a tremendous business on therapist because those

1:01:59.120 --> 1:02:04.800
<v Speaker 1>guys need tremendous headwork. Drabinski and who Philip Rivers? Yeah,

1:02:04.840 --> 1:02:08.440
<v Speaker 1>Philip Rivers? God bless, isn't he? I mean, did you know?

1:02:08.640 --> 1:02:10.439
<v Speaker 1>I mean I watched. I did not see the first

1:02:10.480 --> 1:02:12.440
<v Speaker 1>half of that game because I was under but I

1:02:12.520 --> 1:02:15.480
<v Speaker 1>got to watch the second half of that game from

1:02:15.680 --> 1:02:19.360
<v Speaker 1>the hospital gurnie. And it was funny because we were

1:02:19.360 --> 1:02:22.000
<v Speaker 1>in a recovery room and so I couldn't see anybody.

1:02:22.080 --> 1:02:24.520
<v Speaker 1>I was looking straight up at a TV and everybody

1:02:24.560 --> 1:02:28.080
<v Speaker 1>else in there was also in beds looking up at TV's,

1:02:28.080 --> 1:02:31.200
<v Speaker 1>but everybody was watching this game. And literally on the

1:02:31.320 --> 1:02:35.440
<v Speaker 1>last drive in that recovery room, people were like, oh god.

1:02:35.800 --> 1:02:38.520
<v Speaker 1>Every time Rivers did something wrong, like you could hear

1:02:38.600 --> 1:02:41.920
<v Speaker 1>people moaning, They're like, oh yeah, same all Chargers. Was

1:02:42.000 --> 1:02:44.720
<v Speaker 1>there any doubt in your mind that there was not

1:02:44.960 --> 1:02:46.720
<v Speaker 1>going to be a good ending for the Chargers in

1:02:46.800 --> 1:02:49.080
<v Speaker 1>that well? How could it be? I had plus six

1:02:49.160 --> 1:02:50.320
<v Speaker 1>and a half on the end game. I was like,

1:02:50.440 --> 1:02:52.560
<v Speaker 1>of course charge will get down to even said it

1:02:52.600 --> 1:02:54.560
<v Speaker 1>before the driver said they'll get inside it then and

1:02:54.680 --> 1:02:57.200
<v Speaker 1>won't get it in or Todd, how about me having

1:02:57.320 --> 1:03:00.400
<v Speaker 1>over twenty seven second half and having twenty two points

1:03:00.440 --> 1:03:05.760
<v Speaker 1>in the third quarter, and it's that is a. That

1:03:06.000 --> 1:03:07.840
<v Speaker 1>is a. I was thinking about that after the game.

1:03:07.880 --> 1:03:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I was thinking if people had the over in this

1:03:09.680 --> 1:03:11.560
<v Speaker 1>second half. I didn't even know you had the over

1:03:11.680 --> 1:03:15.600
<v Speaker 1>and that was just atrocious. Geez, that's horrible, Todd. If

1:03:15.640 --> 1:03:17.040
<v Speaker 1>I had known that information that you had a bit,

1:03:17.080 --> 1:03:18.840
<v Speaker 1>I would have shared that with everybody in the recovery room.

1:03:18.880 --> 1:03:21.120
<v Speaker 1>I'd be like, don't worry, Wishnev's got it's gonna happen.

1:03:21.160 --> 1:03:25.200
<v Speaker 1>It's not gonna it's not gonna happen. Everybody nurse to

1:03:25.200 --> 1:03:27.440
<v Speaker 1>their injuries. All right, We've done all we can do.

1:03:27.480 --> 1:03:29.440
<v Speaker 1>I'm sorry that we didn't get Mike's answer to the

1:03:29.520 --> 1:03:31.480
<v Speaker 1>last two questions, but we went over time on him.

1:03:31.800 --> 1:03:34.920
<v Speaker 1>But for Mike Palm, for Todd Wishneff, who is learning, Yes,

1:03:35.000 --> 1:03:37.439
<v Speaker 1>you are learning the Supercharger song. For those who have asked,

1:03:37.640 --> 1:03:42.480
<v Speaker 1>Sandy go Supercharger, It's a much harder song to sing

1:03:42.600 --> 1:03:47.320
<v Speaker 1>then mym it dop. Okay, okay, okay, we know you

1:03:47.520 --> 1:03:50.240
<v Speaker 1>like that song. But what I'm asking for you is

1:03:50.600 --> 1:03:53.160
<v Speaker 1>could you learn, And I'm really serious about this, could

1:03:53.200 --> 1:03:57.280
<v Speaker 1>you learn a verse and the chorus of the Supercharger. So, okay,

1:03:57.400 --> 1:03:59.040
<v Speaker 1>I will try to, but I want you to know

1:03:59.160 --> 1:04:02.040
<v Speaker 1>it's really a much diffic much more difficult song to sing.

1:04:02.160 --> 1:04:03.920
<v Speaker 1>I know, but I think people if as long as

1:04:03.960 --> 1:04:06.120
<v Speaker 1>people are enjoying your music, can you at least develop

1:04:06.160 --> 1:04:08.920
<v Speaker 1>a repertoire. And I think as well. Now, I mean

1:04:09.000 --> 1:04:11.200
<v Speaker 1>I might as well. And I think the Supercharger song

1:04:11.440 --> 1:04:13.200
<v Speaker 1>and you have to have a request from my buddy

1:04:13.240 --> 1:04:16.880
<v Speaker 1>E because he was a Chargers fan growing up. There's

1:04:16.920 --> 1:04:18.600
<v Speaker 1>like a part where it's where they say the word

1:04:18.640 --> 1:04:20.760
<v Speaker 1>sky and it's sky I I something like that, and

1:04:20.800 --> 1:04:23.080
<v Speaker 1>you have to nail these little things about the song.

1:04:23.360 --> 1:04:27.080
<v Speaker 1>He's so I really I I started listening to it

1:04:27.160 --> 1:04:30.040
<v Speaker 1>a little bit on YouTube. Um, it's more funk adelic.

1:04:31.600 --> 1:04:34.400
<v Speaker 1>It's a much harder song to sing. But I will

1:04:34.480 --> 1:04:39.200
<v Speaker 1>absolutely try my best to be able to coerce my

1:04:39.400 --> 1:04:42.280
<v Speaker 1>vocal cords into being able to sing it fair enough.

1:04:42.400 --> 1:04:44.560
<v Speaker 1>It's all I could ask for. Mike Palm for Todd

1:04:44.560 --> 1:04:46.960
<v Speaker 1>Wish for Jeff Parlay producing number five was kind enough

1:04:46.960 --> 1:04:49.400
<v Speaker 1>to step in on a short notice here on this week.

1:04:49.480 --> 1:04:52.160
<v Speaker 1>Thank you everybody writing very nice things on Twitter to

1:04:52.280 --> 1:04:54.720
<v Speaker 1>me really appreciate it. We'll talk to you on the

1:04:54.800 --> 1:04:56.600
<v Speaker 1>Numbers game tomorrow. Good luck with all your picks Week

1:04:56.640 --> 1:04:58.479
<v Speaker 1>twelve in the NFL. Thank you so much for listening

1:05:00.000 --> 1:05:06.640
<v Speaker 1>The ban Pasada Fast Time Bata bo to ta Pasata

1:05:07.000 --> 1:05:09.040
<v Speaker 1>Fast Time, The Bata