1 00:00:03,520 --> 00:00:06,560 Speaker 1: Okay, cam Firs, rise and shine and don't forget your 2 00:00:06,559 --> 00:00:10,959 Speaker 1: booties because it's cool out there today. Yes, I cliched 3 00:00:11,039 --> 00:00:14,440 Speaker 1: it up. I'm starting with a groundhog Day reference. I 4 00:00:14,480 --> 00:00:18,439 Speaker 1: don't yet have the finances to pay for I've got you, 5 00:00:18,520 --> 00:00:22,200 Speaker 1: babe or that, of course, So just have that in 6 00:00:22,239 --> 00:00:23,520 Speaker 1: the back of your head as you hear that. But 7 00:00:23,560 --> 00:00:26,960 Speaker 1: we are on groundhog Day with the shutdown. I certainly 8 00:00:27,000 --> 00:00:29,319 Speaker 1: have other topics I want to get to before I 9 00:00:29,360 --> 00:00:31,680 Speaker 1: get to my interview. My interview for this episode's a 10 00:00:31,720 --> 00:00:35,040 Speaker 1: terrific one with Paul Glastros, editor chief of the Washington Monthly. 11 00:00:36,280 --> 00:00:40,640 Speaker 1: But it's about a different way to rank colleges and universities. 12 00:00:40,840 --> 00:00:43,680 Speaker 1: You know, the US News rankings get all the attention 13 00:00:43,840 --> 00:00:46,319 Speaker 1: they just came out. Well, Washington Monthly has been doing 14 00:00:46,400 --> 00:00:50,440 Speaker 1: rankings themselves, basically almost as a counter and the Washington 15 00:00:50,440 --> 00:00:54,480 Speaker 1: Monthly Rankings tries to prioritize best bang for your buck. 16 00:00:55,000 --> 00:00:58,640 Speaker 1: Does your degree translate into moving up the economic ladder? 17 00:00:59,040 --> 00:01:01,240 Speaker 1: Do you what you get for the money that you 18 00:01:01,320 --> 00:01:05,679 Speaker 1: spend for your education? It, I'm telling you you will, 19 00:01:06,000 --> 00:01:08,959 Speaker 1: whether you have kids headed to college, whether you are 20 00:01:09,040 --> 00:01:10,720 Speaker 1: tired of paying your student loans, and you want to 21 00:01:10,720 --> 00:01:15,200 Speaker 1: hear about it, whether it's about saving for college in 22 00:01:15,280 --> 00:01:18,000 Speaker 1: any way, whatever you've done about this, trust me, you 23 00:01:18,040 --> 00:01:23,440 Speaker 1: will enjoy this conversation. I learned a lot about the 24 00:01:23,480 --> 00:01:25,840 Speaker 1: different ways of higher education. And one of the things 25 00:01:25,880 --> 00:01:28,319 Speaker 1: you got to remember about the United States. You know 26 00:01:28,680 --> 00:01:31,400 Speaker 1: we I think we have massive problems in primary and 27 00:01:31,440 --> 00:01:34,280 Speaker 1: secondary these days. Our public school system needs a massive 28 00:01:34,959 --> 00:01:41,000 Speaker 1: overhaul revamp. The privatization movement is probably uh, sort of 29 00:01:41,160 --> 00:01:44,920 Speaker 1: over over cranked here a little bit. It's it's the 30 00:01:45,240 --> 00:01:50,120 Speaker 1: whole thing is is a tapestry of of good intentions 31 00:01:50,720 --> 00:01:54,320 Speaker 1: but yet still bad outcomes. In the world of higher education, 32 00:01:54,400 --> 00:01:57,320 Speaker 1: I mean, you know, we we have so many terrific 33 00:01:57,360 --> 00:02:01,520 Speaker 1: institutions in this country all over the country. It is 34 00:02:01,560 --> 00:02:03,400 Speaker 1: not you know, it is it is hard to say 35 00:02:03,440 --> 00:02:05,880 Speaker 1: that there is a state that has that doesn't have 36 00:02:06,320 --> 00:02:13,720 Speaker 1: a good higher education higher education school. So it is uh, 37 00:02:13,840 --> 00:02:17,440 Speaker 1: it's a fascinating conversation. I think you'll enjoy it. And 38 00:02:17,440 --> 00:02:19,560 Speaker 1: and you know, in the journalism world here in Washington, 39 00:02:19,600 --> 00:02:20,959 Speaker 1: a lot of us have known Paul for a long 40 00:02:21,000 --> 00:02:25,320 Speaker 1: time because he's been our In some cases, the Washington 41 00:02:25,320 --> 00:02:27,480 Speaker 1: Monthly would would be the first place to that some 42 00:02:27,520 --> 00:02:30,680 Speaker 1: of us got our long form magazine articles, and I 43 00:02:30,720 --> 00:02:33,960 Speaker 1: count myself among among one of those that was able 44 00:02:33,960 --> 00:02:37,639 Speaker 1: to get a byeline in the Monthly and among other 45 00:02:37,639 --> 00:02:39,760 Speaker 1: places when I was doing freelance during my days at 46 00:02:39,760 --> 00:02:44,160 Speaker 1: the hotline. So it is a always a privilege to 47 00:02:44,200 --> 00:02:48,760 Speaker 1: hear from Paul. He is he is certainly extraordine experience. 48 00:02:48,840 --> 00:02:51,920 Speaker 1: But this isn't I'm telling you. It's a great conversation 49 00:02:52,560 --> 00:02:57,440 Speaker 1: about college affordability, which of course is something I think 50 00:02:57,480 --> 00:03:00,160 Speaker 1: that touches so many of us. But here we are 51 00:03:00,200 --> 00:03:03,440 Speaker 1: with the shutdown, and look, I will fall on my 52 00:03:03,560 --> 00:03:06,040 Speaker 1: nostrodama sword. I really did think we were going to 53 00:03:06,080 --> 00:03:08,239 Speaker 1: be done after a week. I think we should be 54 00:03:08,400 --> 00:03:10,880 Speaker 1: done with this by now. I think the Democrats have 55 00:03:11,360 --> 00:03:15,440 Speaker 1: accomplished what they wanted to accomplish out of it politically. 56 00:03:15,919 --> 00:03:18,919 Speaker 1: Now they don't have an agreement yet to extend these 57 00:03:19,520 --> 00:03:22,480 Speaker 1: subsidies for the Affordable Care Act or Obamacare, whatever you 58 00:03:22,520 --> 00:03:25,160 Speaker 1: want to refer to it as. But it's pretty clear 59 00:03:25,200 --> 00:03:27,800 Speaker 1: that they've gotten the issue more front and center. They've 60 00:03:27,800 --> 00:03:31,200 Speaker 1: got more Republicans talking about it, They've got the President 61 00:03:31,200 --> 00:03:33,120 Speaker 1: of the United States concerned about it, they got the 62 00:03:33,160 --> 00:03:36,640 Speaker 1: Vice president. It is if they want, as I've said 63 00:03:37,280 --> 00:03:39,960 Speaker 1: in previous episodes this week, if they want to declare victory, 64 00:03:40,000 --> 00:03:43,040 Speaker 1: they could and say they got what they wanted to 65 00:03:43,080 --> 00:03:46,080 Speaker 1: get out of this. And if the Republicans back off 66 00:03:46,120 --> 00:03:49,400 Speaker 1: their agreement to try to hammer out a deal on Obamacare, 67 00:03:50,080 --> 00:03:53,360 Speaker 1: well this continuing Resolution is only for another six weeks, 68 00:03:53,360 --> 00:03:57,920 Speaker 1: so they have another leverage point. And I would say this, 69 00:03:58,120 --> 00:03:59,840 Speaker 1: I mean, look, there's no evidence that this is going 70 00:03:59,880 --> 00:04:03,680 Speaker 1: to and this weekend. I you know, so I was 71 00:04:03,720 --> 00:04:07,600 Speaker 1: wrong about that, but we're going to be missing a paycheck. 72 00:04:08,400 --> 00:04:11,680 Speaker 1: The first paycheck missing happens at the beginning of next week. 73 00:04:12,040 --> 00:04:18,479 Speaker 1: We've got already impacts on the traveling public right now. 74 00:04:19,560 --> 00:04:23,320 Speaker 1: You know, I didn't have any problems going from lax 75 00:04:23,360 --> 00:04:27,880 Speaker 1: to Washington Dulles after visiting USC. But I promise you 76 00:04:27,920 --> 00:04:33,799 Speaker 1: if you're traveling, whether it's Nashville, Indianapolis, Des Moines, Albuquerque, 77 00:04:34,360 --> 00:04:38,120 Speaker 1: any slightly smaller market than some of the large ones, 78 00:04:40,480 --> 00:04:43,880 Speaker 1: you know, it doesn't take too many air traffic controllers 79 00:04:43,880 --> 00:04:48,200 Speaker 1: in that region to suddenly call in sick to where 80 00:04:48,240 --> 00:04:51,480 Speaker 1: you're grounding all flights. Right. It had a huge impact 81 00:04:51,520 --> 00:04:54,360 Speaker 1: in Nashville a couple of days ago, this is in 82 00:04:54,400 --> 00:04:57,039 Speaker 1: the LA area. Burbank essentially had to go to a 83 00:04:57,080 --> 00:05:00,200 Speaker 1: ground stop for a few hours the other day. So 84 00:05:00,720 --> 00:05:03,240 Speaker 1: this is only going to grow. This is only going 85 00:05:03,279 --> 00:05:06,240 Speaker 1: to get worse. And this is where the more the 86 00:05:06,279 --> 00:05:10,440 Speaker 1: public is personally impacted by these things, the more they're 87 00:05:10,480 --> 00:05:14,520 Speaker 1: going to be upset at all parties involved, and they 88 00:05:14,560 --> 00:05:17,599 Speaker 1: may no longer be as focused on the issue that 89 00:05:17,680 --> 00:05:23,000 Speaker 1: I do think Democrats have successfully gotten into the pushed 90 00:05:23,040 --> 00:05:27,000 Speaker 1: into the zeitgeist here a little bit. Look, it's hard 91 00:05:27,000 --> 00:05:28,600 Speaker 1: for any issue to break through in the Trump era 92 00:05:29,440 --> 00:05:33,800 Speaker 1: for any given period of time, but this issue of 93 00:05:33,800 --> 00:05:37,479 Speaker 1: health care certainly has the attention of the Republicans on this. 94 00:05:37,640 --> 00:05:43,599 Speaker 1: So now it's a game of chicken and the longer, frankly, 95 00:05:43,640 --> 00:05:45,320 Speaker 1: if I look on the Democratic side, the longer they 96 00:05:45,320 --> 00:05:48,320 Speaker 1: hold out what I say yesterday, then this really isn't 97 00:05:48,320 --> 00:05:51,120 Speaker 1: about health care. This is about something else. And frankly, 98 00:05:51,160 --> 00:05:54,640 Speaker 1: it is about something else, right. It is about the 99 00:05:54,680 --> 00:05:57,640 Speaker 1: fact that Donald Trump is not respecting the Constitution, he's 100 00:05:57,680 --> 00:06:01,040 Speaker 1: not respecting the appropriations process, he's not respecting the legislative branch. 101 00:06:02,120 --> 00:06:03,880 Speaker 1: But the Democrats have a problem. They're not in charge 102 00:06:03,920 --> 00:06:06,800 Speaker 1: of the legislative branch right now, it's the Republicans who 103 00:06:06,800 --> 00:06:12,480 Speaker 1: are allowing the executive branch to steamroll them because they're 104 00:06:12,480 --> 00:06:15,120 Speaker 1: the ones in charge, and it's an issue that's hard 105 00:06:15,120 --> 00:06:17,800 Speaker 1: to get the public to rally around. They're going to 106 00:06:17,880 --> 00:06:21,279 Speaker 1: rally around things and impact their lives. Yes, what's happening 107 00:06:21,680 --> 00:06:24,120 Speaker 1: with the misuse of appropriations and the sort of the 108 00:06:24,960 --> 00:06:27,200 Speaker 1: aggressive nature of what O and B has tried to 109 00:06:27,240 --> 00:06:31,000 Speaker 1: do is impactful on people's lives, but it's much harder 110 00:06:31,040 --> 00:06:35,039 Speaker 1: for them to see it. You know, it's healthcare hits 111 00:06:35,080 --> 00:06:38,800 Speaker 1: their bottom line. That this is premiums doubling. That that 112 00:06:39,960 --> 00:06:42,320 Speaker 1: is the cost to live issue, which of course has 113 00:06:42,520 --> 00:06:46,120 Speaker 1: arguably been what's been hanging over our politics since we 114 00:06:46,200 --> 00:06:49,920 Speaker 1: got out of the COVID shutdown. And I think in 115 00:06:49,920 --> 00:06:54,719 Speaker 1: some ways, the healthcare the rising healthcare premiums would only 116 00:06:54,760 --> 00:07:00,040 Speaker 1: feed into the cost of to live issues that the 117 00:07:00,040 --> 00:07:04,640 Speaker 1: araffs and some of the other policies that President Trump 118 00:07:04,680 --> 00:07:08,760 Speaker 1: has pursued has done. I mean, we are, as I 119 00:07:08,760 --> 00:07:13,239 Speaker 1: said before, we we have this weird economy that will 120 00:07:13,560 --> 00:07:17,520 Speaker 1: statistically look good for those that have money, but it 121 00:07:17,640 --> 00:07:21,560 Speaker 1: is completely impossible to catch up or get ahead, or 122 00:07:21,720 --> 00:07:25,760 Speaker 1: if you don't already have a little bit of savings earning, 123 00:07:26,400 --> 00:07:31,520 Speaker 1: you know, or taking advantage of the supercharged markets that 124 00:07:31,560 --> 00:07:34,240 Speaker 1: we have right now, fueled by all of this artificial 125 00:07:34,240 --> 00:07:39,480 Speaker 1: intelligence investment. So we are in a situation where either 126 00:07:39,480 --> 00:07:42,680 Speaker 1: party can end the shutdown right now. Democrats could declare victory, 127 00:07:43,880 --> 00:07:46,880 Speaker 1: provide the eight votes, open the government up, and have 128 00:07:47,880 --> 00:07:50,120 Speaker 1: six weeks to hold them accountable again if they don't 129 00:07:50,160 --> 00:07:52,800 Speaker 1: come to the table. And of course Republicans could open 130 00:07:52,800 --> 00:07:55,400 Speaker 1: the government right now themselves. They don't need a single 131 00:07:55,440 --> 00:07:57,400 Speaker 1: Democratic vote. They'd have to get rid of the filibuster, 132 00:07:57,800 --> 00:07:59,480 Speaker 1: but they could do it on a party line vote 133 00:08:00,120 --> 00:08:03,560 Speaker 1: anytime they wanted to. So we are in the This 134 00:08:03,640 --> 00:08:06,680 Speaker 1: is a choice aspect of the shutdown. This is truly 135 00:08:06,720 --> 00:08:10,480 Speaker 1: a choice. And I just would warn Democrats on this one. 136 00:08:11,000 --> 00:08:13,960 Speaker 1: You've you've had some success here getting this issue more 137 00:08:13,960 --> 00:08:18,559 Speaker 1: front and center in the public's mind, but by the way, 138 00:08:19,040 --> 00:08:22,960 Speaker 1: your negatives are rising as a political party over the 139 00:08:23,000 --> 00:08:27,560 Speaker 1: pulling that that that matriculated out this past week one 140 00:08:28,160 --> 00:08:30,880 Speaker 1: on two, and that risks potentially at some point, the 141 00:08:30,920 --> 00:08:35,280 Speaker 1: more Americans have their lives disrupted, the more they're likely 142 00:08:36,120 --> 00:08:40,080 Speaker 1: to then sour on everybody and then whatever slight even 143 00:08:40,120 --> 00:08:43,120 Speaker 1: issue advantage of just getting the healthcare issue into the 144 00:08:43,160 --> 00:08:47,560 Speaker 1: ether disappears, and then it becomes, well, what did you 145 00:08:47,600 --> 00:08:51,080 Speaker 1: gain for all that adjuta with the shutdown? So you 146 00:08:51,120 --> 00:08:54,320 Speaker 1: know there's a there's there's a point of diminishing returns here. 147 00:08:54,880 --> 00:08:58,480 Speaker 1: At what point does Team Blue see that? We shall 148 00:08:58,600 --> 00:09:02,000 Speaker 1: find out. But again, before I get to a few 149 00:09:02,000 --> 00:09:04,640 Speaker 1: other issues I want to get to, Republicans could just 150 00:09:04,679 --> 00:09:06,560 Speaker 1: do it on their own if they chose to. They're 151 00:09:06,600 --> 00:09:09,360 Speaker 1: also apparently don't mind, and that that gets sort of 152 00:09:09,360 --> 00:09:12,360 Speaker 1: what I said yesterday my groundhog Day response here, which 153 00:09:12,400 --> 00:09:15,160 Speaker 1: is I think the base of both parties think they're winning, 154 00:09:16,040 --> 00:09:17,559 Speaker 1: and so when you think you're winning, you don't want 155 00:09:17,559 --> 00:09:22,920 Speaker 1: to stop. The problem is is how big you know, 156 00:09:23,120 --> 00:09:26,000 Speaker 1: first of all, your feedback loop is is unfortunately very small. 157 00:09:26,480 --> 00:09:31,000 Speaker 1: You know, where's everybody else? How big is the everybody 158 00:09:31,000 --> 00:09:35,760 Speaker 1: else pile there? And I think that's that's an open question. 159 00:09:36,720 --> 00:09:41,120 Speaker 1: But look, the the other issue that's sort of front 160 00:09:41,120 --> 00:09:42,720 Speaker 1: and center for a lot of people is what's happening 161 00:09:42,720 --> 00:09:47,720 Speaker 1: in Chicago and this sort of showdown between the Trump 162 00:09:47,760 --> 00:09:52,040 Speaker 1: administration and the governor of Illinois and the mayor of Chicago. 163 00:09:54,240 --> 00:09:58,880 Speaker 1: This is you know this it it is a few updates. Obviously, 164 00:09:58,920 --> 00:10:01,720 Speaker 1: you had the president escal his war of words with 165 00:10:02,120 --> 00:10:06,600 Speaker 1: the mayor and the governor, calling on the Democratic leaders 166 00:10:06,600 --> 00:10:10,960 Speaker 1: to be impeached, actually be imprisoned for failing to protect 167 00:10:11,080 --> 00:10:15,960 Speaker 1: ice officers. Trump wrote on his truth social post, Chicago 168 00:10:16,000 --> 00:10:18,600 Speaker 1: mayor should be in jail for failing to protect ice officers. 169 00:10:18,600 --> 00:10:23,120 Speaker 1: Governor Pritzker also, I don't think anybody's saying that they're 170 00:10:23,120 --> 00:10:26,160 Speaker 1: not protecting ice officers here. But of course this is 171 00:10:26,160 --> 00:10:31,280 Speaker 1: this sort of the the the pretext that it appears 172 00:10:31,360 --> 00:10:35,960 Speaker 1: the Trump administration is trying to create in order to 173 00:10:36,080 --> 00:10:39,200 Speaker 1: force this situation. I have to say, the most bizarre 174 00:10:39,240 --> 00:10:43,400 Speaker 1: aspect of all this is the is what the state 175 00:10:43,440 --> 00:10:46,240 Speaker 1: of Texas agreed to do? You know, It's one thing, Look, 176 00:10:46,720 --> 00:10:49,240 Speaker 1: the President has the authority to federalize the National Guard 177 00:10:49,240 --> 00:10:53,000 Speaker 1: in Illinois, so he did it. But to use Texas 178 00:10:53,040 --> 00:10:57,800 Speaker 1: troops to essentially invade Illinois, right, and I don't you know, 179 00:10:57,880 --> 00:11:00,360 Speaker 1: I know, it can come across that everybody's getting very 180 00:11:00,440 --> 00:11:05,280 Speaker 1: dramatic here about some of these things. But nobody seems 181 00:11:05,320 --> 00:11:09,000 Speaker 1: to remember the golden rule in life or in politics. Right, 182 00:11:09,040 --> 00:11:12,040 Speaker 1: do unto others as you want done unto you. And 183 00:11:12,120 --> 00:11:16,800 Speaker 1: I asked the governor of Texas, how would you feel 184 00:11:17,720 --> 00:11:21,400 Speaker 1: if a Democratic president decided to send an a governor 185 00:11:21,440 --> 00:11:29,440 Speaker 1: of Illinois decided to offer up National Guard troops to 186 00:11:29,600 --> 00:11:39,960 Speaker 1: occupy a city in Texas, right without the governor's essentially acquiescence. 187 00:11:41,000 --> 00:11:42,680 Speaker 1: I think I know where Texans would stand on this. 188 00:11:43,559 --> 00:11:47,920 Speaker 1: And that's the point here. Nobody seems to be thinking about, 189 00:11:48,480 --> 00:11:52,880 Speaker 1: Oh is you know what happens if the roles are reversed? Right, 190 00:11:53,520 --> 00:11:57,120 Speaker 1: And this has certainly been a virus. It's in our 191 00:11:57,240 --> 00:12:00,520 Speaker 1: politics these days where nobody thinks of the of the 192 00:12:00,600 --> 00:12:04,240 Speaker 1: reactionary consequence to anything. We don't treat people the way 193 00:12:04,280 --> 00:12:06,640 Speaker 1: we want to be treated. In some ways, we're treating 194 00:12:06,640 --> 00:12:09,600 Speaker 1: people the way we we think how poorly we're being 195 00:12:09,640 --> 00:12:12,760 Speaker 1: treated right. Part of that is internet brain, right. I 196 00:12:12,800 --> 00:12:16,240 Speaker 1: think there's way too many people right now in high 197 00:12:16,360 --> 00:12:20,280 Speaker 1: level leadership positions on the left and the right who 198 00:12:20,280 --> 00:12:23,200 Speaker 1: are live online and don't live in the real world. 199 00:12:23,800 --> 00:12:26,520 Speaker 1: And so I do think this is why there's a 200 00:12:26,559 --> 00:12:30,040 Speaker 1: disconnect between those that are extraordinarily alarmed by what's happening 201 00:12:30,360 --> 00:12:34,800 Speaker 1: and those that are like, here we go again with 202 00:12:34,800 --> 00:12:39,880 Speaker 1: with things now. I would say, you know, the courts 203 00:12:40,040 --> 00:12:44,520 Speaker 1: are are playing a role here and are providing you know, 204 00:12:44,559 --> 00:12:49,400 Speaker 1: the Constitution hasn't been shredded yet. Okay uh, And I 205 00:12:49,400 --> 00:12:53,200 Speaker 1: think that should be seen as a positive and not 206 00:12:53,360 --> 00:12:58,760 Speaker 1: something that is that is that is me being naive 207 00:12:59,520 --> 00:13:01,840 Speaker 1: on this front. We had a federal judge in Chicago 208 00:13:01,840 --> 00:13:06,360 Speaker 1: on Wednesday extending a nationwide consent decree that requires ICE 209 00:13:07,960 --> 00:13:12,640 Speaker 1: to better document and report probable cause for their immigration arrests, 210 00:13:13,360 --> 00:13:15,480 Speaker 1: and they have found this judge found that the agency 211 00:13:15,559 --> 00:13:19,000 Speaker 1: repeatedly has violated the twenty twenty two agreement by making 212 00:13:19,120 --> 00:13:25,040 Speaker 1: warrantless arrests, both before and during what they called Operation 213 00:13:25,280 --> 00:13:29,720 Speaker 1: Midway Blitz. The judge also took particular issue with the 214 00:13:29,720 --> 00:13:33,800 Speaker 1: practice by ICE agents here, according to the Chicago Tribune, 215 00:13:34,760 --> 00:13:38,960 Speaker 1: of carrying blank warrant forms known as I two hundreds 216 00:13:39,000 --> 00:13:42,440 Speaker 1: with them on missions and essentially filling them out at 217 00:13:42,480 --> 00:13:45,880 Speaker 1: the scene. Right, they cannot prove that where they're going 218 00:13:45,920 --> 00:13:49,040 Speaker 1: that there was a there was a criminal intent by 219 00:13:49,240 --> 00:13:52,240 Speaker 1: the person that they believe is in this country illegally, 220 00:13:53,600 --> 00:13:56,640 Speaker 1: so they're basically, you know, getting there and then coming 221 00:13:56,720 --> 00:13:59,880 Speaker 1: up filling out the form to try to try to 222 00:14:00,000 --> 00:14:04,240 Speaker 1: sort of come up with a legal pretext after the fact, 223 00:14:06,240 --> 00:14:08,920 Speaker 1: and the judges, rightfully, I think, lectured them about this. 224 00:14:09,040 --> 00:14:14,840 Speaker 1: And I can't imagine this one that this part of 225 00:14:14,920 --> 00:14:19,440 Speaker 1: the ruling somehow gets over overturned or overruled by a 226 00:14:19,520 --> 00:14:22,760 Speaker 1: higher court. We'll see on that front. But I think 227 00:14:22,760 --> 00:14:25,240 Speaker 1: more importantly it's what is the public see and what 228 00:14:25,280 --> 00:14:27,840 Speaker 1: are they thinking? Right? If you live online, right, if 229 00:14:27,840 --> 00:14:31,520 Speaker 1: you live only in the blue sphere, this is the 230 00:14:31,520 --> 00:14:33,720 Speaker 1: beginning of the end of the republic. If you only 231 00:14:33,760 --> 00:14:38,720 Speaker 1: live in the red sphere, it's about time that the 232 00:14:38,720 --> 00:14:43,080 Speaker 1: federal government did something that the mayors and the governor 233 00:14:43,120 --> 00:14:47,240 Speaker 1: refused to do in protecting Americans. Right. But the question 234 00:14:47,360 --> 00:14:49,600 Speaker 1: is that we live we you know, most of the 235 00:14:49,600 --> 00:14:53,080 Speaker 1: rest of us live in this gray area. And what's 236 00:14:53,080 --> 00:14:58,000 Speaker 1: interesting about the polling here is that there's there's comfort 237 00:14:58,080 --> 00:15:00,640 Speaker 1: in the poll numbers for both sides, and there's warnings 238 00:15:00,640 --> 00:15:02,440 Speaker 1: in the poll numbers for both sides. So there's a 239 00:15:02,480 --> 00:15:07,320 Speaker 1: new Reuter's zipso's poll that shows fifty eight percent of Americans, 240 00:15:08,120 --> 00:15:11,920 Speaker 1: including seventy percent of Democrats and fifty percent of Republicans, 241 00:15:13,000 --> 00:15:16,320 Speaker 1: they feel the president should only deploy armed troops to 242 00:15:16,440 --> 00:15:20,280 Speaker 1: face quote external threats. Now, part of that may explain 243 00:15:20,320 --> 00:15:23,240 Speaker 1: why the president and Stephen Miller in particular, keep using 244 00:15:24,240 --> 00:15:28,120 Speaker 1: overheated rhetoric to describe what they say ICE agents are 245 00:15:28,120 --> 00:15:30,720 Speaker 1: dealing with and what they say the threat is from 246 00:15:30,760 --> 00:15:38,280 Speaker 1: some of these undocumented immigrants. But it is there's clearly 247 00:15:38,320 --> 00:15:41,840 Speaker 1: a line here where the more militarized this looks, the 248 00:15:41,880 --> 00:15:48,440 Speaker 1: more uncomfortable the public gets, including plenty of Republicans. Now, 249 00:15:48,480 --> 00:15:53,200 Speaker 1: that said, and what's interesting here is that there is 250 00:15:53,240 --> 00:15:57,360 Speaker 1: not a majority that believe that the president has some 251 00:15:57,400 --> 00:16:01,760 Speaker 1: sort of huge authority to do this. Thirty seven percent 252 00:16:01,840 --> 00:16:04,360 Speaker 1: agree that the presidents of either party should have the 253 00:16:04,360 --> 00:16:07,400 Speaker 1: power to deploy troops into states even when state governors object, 254 00:16:07,680 --> 00:16:12,080 Speaker 1: but forty eight percent disagree with that, And in fact, 255 00:16:12,280 --> 00:16:16,480 Speaker 1: eighty three percent overall in this poll agreed that the 256 00:16:16,520 --> 00:16:19,960 Speaker 1: military quote should remain politically neutral and not take a 257 00:16:20,000 --> 00:16:24,960 Speaker 1: side in a domestic policy debate. Now, there's another poll 258 00:16:24,960 --> 00:16:27,560 Speaker 1: that was out in the New York Times seeing a poll, 259 00:16:27,600 --> 00:16:29,440 Speaker 1: and it's part of the same poll that came out 260 00:16:29,760 --> 00:16:31,560 Speaker 1: last week that I was telling you about. But they 261 00:16:31,920 --> 00:16:37,480 Speaker 1: released their immigration questions on Wednesday, and essentially it's showing 262 00:16:37,520 --> 00:16:39,120 Speaker 1: you the same thing that I've been telling you for 263 00:16:39,120 --> 00:16:43,760 Speaker 1: a while, which is a majority agree with the goal 264 00:16:43,920 --> 00:16:46,880 Speaker 1: of what Trump is doing, but a majority don't like 265 00:16:47,240 --> 00:16:49,640 Speaker 1: how he's trying to do it. Let me put some 266 00:16:49,760 --> 00:16:52,720 Speaker 1: numbers around that. Fifty four percent of registered voters broadly 267 00:16:52,760 --> 00:16:57,240 Speaker 1: favored deporting immigrants living in the country illegally. Okay, that's 268 00:16:57,320 --> 00:17:00,760 Speaker 1: ninety percent among Republicans, fifty two percent among independent and 269 00:17:00,840 --> 00:17:03,720 Speaker 1: about twenty percent of Democrats think this. Now, you'll see 270 00:17:03,760 --> 00:17:09,240 Speaker 1: on that issue of mass deportation, independence much closer to 271 00:17:09,280 --> 00:17:12,840 Speaker 1: Republicans than they are Democrats. Right, it's a majority of independents. 272 00:17:13,080 --> 00:17:15,399 Speaker 1: That to me a little warning sign there for Democrats 273 00:17:15,760 --> 00:17:19,960 Speaker 1: on their stance on immigration. Now, that said, fifty three 274 00:17:19,960 --> 00:17:22,960 Speaker 1: percent of voters feel the process of deporting people has 275 00:17:23,040 --> 00:17:27,399 Speaker 1: not been fair, and forty four percent said it was 276 00:17:27,600 --> 00:17:32,359 Speaker 1: mostly fair. So that tells you in fifty two percent 277 00:17:32,400 --> 00:17:35,160 Speaker 1: of those surveyed also disapproved of Trump's handling of immigration. 278 00:17:35,240 --> 00:17:37,760 Speaker 1: The point is this, a majority of people in this 279 00:17:37,840 --> 00:17:41,800 Speaker 1: country do think that too many people were let in 280 00:17:41,880 --> 00:17:47,520 Speaker 1: illegally and many of them should be returned. But there 281 00:17:47,560 --> 00:17:50,919 Speaker 1: is a discomfort in the aggressive tactics that are being used, 282 00:17:52,040 --> 00:17:55,200 Speaker 1: and the more that is front and Center, the more 283 00:17:55,359 --> 00:17:59,280 Speaker 1: Americans may sour on the policy itself, but this is 284 00:17:59,320 --> 00:18:05,240 Speaker 1: to me the warning sign here a little bit. What's 285 00:18:05,280 --> 00:18:07,840 Speaker 1: interesting is fifty one percent said they thought the government 286 00:18:07,920 --> 00:18:10,760 Speaker 1: was deporting mostly people who quote should be deported. Forty 287 00:18:10,760 --> 00:18:13,320 Speaker 1: two percent of the government was deporting the wrong people. 288 00:18:14,280 --> 00:18:16,600 Speaker 1: But there's a narrow majority there. So the point is 289 00:18:16,600 --> 00:18:21,560 Speaker 1: is that Democrats have to find realize that a majority 290 00:18:21,560 --> 00:18:25,800 Speaker 1: in this country want the law followed. At the same time, 291 00:18:26,440 --> 00:18:28,639 Speaker 1: a majority of the country's more open to immigration than 292 00:18:28,680 --> 00:18:32,679 Speaker 1: perhaps the Trump administration is behaving. So like everything in 293 00:18:32,720 --> 00:18:35,600 Speaker 1: our politics, there's more nuanced in gray area than the 294 00:18:35,640 --> 00:18:39,200 Speaker 1: two parties are presenting each other. But it is where 295 00:18:39,280 --> 00:18:46,040 Speaker 1: we are at this moment. I do think the Trump 296 00:18:46,119 --> 00:18:52,120 Speaker 1: White House believes that Pritzker and Mayor Johnson are good 297 00:18:52,160 --> 00:18:56,680 Speaker 1: foils for them politically. I think they're personalizing this on purpose, 298 00:18:57,400 --> 00:18:59,720 Speaker 1: and Pritzker and Johnson are playing right into it because 299 00:18:59,720 --> 00:19:02,080 Speaker 1: I think they think it's good politics to get personal 300 00:19:02,200 --> 00:19:07,200 Speaker 1: right back. It is worth noting that Trump put out 301 00:19:07,200 --> 00:19:11,240 Speaker 1: that truth social statement on Wednesday after Pritzker on Tuesday 302 00:19:11,320 --> 00:19:18,639 Speaker 1: night opened wondered aloud whether Trump has dementia, So it 303 00:19:18,720 --> 00:19:23,080 Speaker 1: is certainly getting personal and in that sense, that's also 304 00:19:23,119 --> 00:19:24,520 Speaker 1: a bit of a you know, it goes back to 305 00:19:24,600 --> 00:19:26,840 Speaker 1: my whole who's going to be the adult in the room. 306 00:19:27,880 --> 00:19:30,760 Speaker 1: And when you start to go name calling against Trump, 307 00:19:30,840 --> 00:19:33,840 Speaker 1: you have to remember the rule of the pig, which 308 00:19:33,920 --> 00:19:37,320 Speaker 1: is careful getting to a mudfight with a pig, because 309 00:19:37,359 --> 00:19:39,639 Speaker 1: you'll both get dirty and the pig will enjoy it. 310 00:19:40,040 --> 00:19:41,800 Speaker 1: This is a classic case. You want to get into 311 00:19:41,800 --> 00:19:44,840 Speaker 1: a name calling fight with Donald Trump, He's always willing 312 00:19:44,880 --> 00:19:50,119 Speaker 1: to go lower, He's always going to be more outlandish, 313 00:19:50,480 --> 00:19:55,440 Speaker 1: go to places you'll never be comfortable going, and you'll 314 00:19:55,480 --> 00:19:57,880 Speaker 1: look and then all of a sudden, you'll look feckless 315 00:19:57,920 --> 00:20:01,960 Speaker 1: for some reason. So it's warning there, and it's obvious 316 00:20:02,000 --> 00:20:06,240 Speaker 1: what the political motivation is there. Clearly is an attempt 317 00:20:06,280 --> 00:20:09,639 Speaker 1: by the Trump administration. Perhaps this is the Stephen Miller 318 00:20:09,680 --> 00:20:14,320 Speaker 1: plan to create a confrontation, to create a pretext to 319 00:20:14,400 --> 00:20:16,720 Speaker 1: then do more of this and get more aggressive of 320 00:20:16,760 --> 00:20:20,000 Speaker 1: these tactics. But the political warning signed to Miller and 321 00:20:20,040 --> 00:20:22,320 Speaker 1: the Trump White House is the more aggressive they get, 322 00:20:22,359 --> 00:20:24,080 Speaker 1: the more Americans are going to turn on them on this, 323 00:20:25,520 --> 00:20:29,440 Speaker 1: and even among Republicans, so as much as it looks 324 00:20:29,480 --> 00:20:34,439 Speaker 1: as if they're completely ignoring sort of the reality of 325 00:20:34,440 --> 00:20:37,600 Speaker 1: the situation, and they're frankly lying about the threat, the 326 00:20:37,680 --> 00:20:40,400 Speaker 1: level of threat that folks in Chicago are dealing with. 327 00:20:41,280 --> 00:20:43,919 Speaker 1: There's real political risk in how they're handling this, just 328 00:20:43,960 --> 00:20:46,840 Speaker 1: as much as there's real risk for Democrats not looking 329 00:20:47,200 --> 00:20:50,480 Speaker 1: like they're not in favor of the rule of law either. 330 00:20:51,160 --> 00:20:56,240 Speaker 1: So I wanted to deal I will say this, I'm not. 331 00:20:56,920 --> 00:20:59,639 Speaker 1: The reason I'm not my hair's not on fire on 332 00:20:59,680 --> 00:21:06,080 Speaker 1: this is that I do think the system is working 333 00:21:06,119 --> 00:21:09,040 Speaker 1: more than it isn't right. The courts are having their say. 334 00:21:10,480 --> 00:21:14,240 Speaker 1: There's a lot of loud rhetoric from Stephen Miller, irresponsible rhetoric, 335 00:21:14,520 --> 00:21:18,920 Speaker 1: but they're biting by the court rulings. So I'm not 336 00:21:18,960 --> 00:21:21,560 Speaker 1: saying this is something we shouldn't be concerned about. We 337 00:21:21,600 --> 00:21:24,960 Speaker 1: should be on high alert about. They should, but we 338 00:21:25,080 --> 00:21:30,040 Speaker 1: got to continue to use the system itself to enact 339 00:21:30,040 --> 00:21:35,280 Speaker 1: the guardrails rather than trying to take matters into anybody's 340 00:21:35,520 --> 00:21:44,800 Speaker 1: own hands. There's a reason results matter more than promises, 341 00:21:45,280 --> 00:21:47,600 Speaker 1: just like there's a reason Morgan and Morgan is America's 342 00:21:47,760 --> 00:21:50,880 Speaker 1: largest injury law firm. For the last thirty five years, 343 00:21:50,920 --> 00:21:53,960 Speaker 1: they've recovered twenty five billion dollars for more than half 344 00:21:54,000 --> 00:21:58,080 Speaker 1: a million clients. It includes cases where insurance companies offered 345 00:21:58,200 --> 00:22:00,960 Speaker 1: next to nothing, just hoping to get away with paying 346 00:22:01,000 --> 00:22:03,880 Speaker 1: as little as possible. Morgan and Morgan fought back ended 347 00:22:03,960 --> 00:22:06,720 Speaker 1: up winning millions. In fact, in Pennsylvania, one client was 348 00:22:06,720 --> 00:22:10,560 Speaker 1: awarded twenty six million dollars, which was a staggering forty 349 00:22:10,600 --> 00:22:13,760 Speaker 1: times the amount that the insurance company originally offered. That 350 00:22:13,840 --> 00:22:17,280 Speaker 1: original offer six hundred and fifty thousand dollars twenty six million, 351 00:22:17,520 --> 00:22:19,520 Speaker 1: six hundred fifty thousand dollars. So with more than one 352 00:22:19,520 --> 00:22:22,040 Speaker 1: thousand lawyers across the country, they know how to deliver 353 00:22:22,119 --> 00:22:24,639 Speaker 1: for everyday people. If you're injured, you need a lawyer. 354 00:22:25,080 --> 00:22:27,399 Speaker 1: You need somebody to get your back. Check out for 355 00:22:27,480 --> 00:22:31,080 Speaker 1: the People dot com, Slash podcast, or dial pound Law 356 00:22:31,800 --> 00:22:35,919 Speaker 1: Pound five two nine law on your cell phone. And 357 00:22:36,000 --> 00:22:38,240 Speaker 1: remember all law firms are not the same. So check 358 00:22:38,240 --> 00:22:41,040 Speaker 1: out Morgan and Morgan. Their fee is free unless they win. 359 00:22:46,119 --> 00:22:48,399 Speaker 1: All right, A few other notes that I want to 360 00:22:48,400 --> 00:22:51,399 Speaker 1: get to before we get to the interview with mister Glastrous. 361 00:22:52,960 --> 00:22:56,880 Speaker 1: The DNC is starting to circulate its after action report 362 00:22:57,960 --> 00:23:01,240 Speaker 1: on the twenty twenty four election Politico has gotten a 363 00:23:01,240 --> 00:23:03,639 Speaker 1: few sources to talk about the thwart of top lines 364 00:23:03,640 --> 00:23:10,639 Speaker 1: that are being circulated to certain Democratic leaders. And here's 365 00:23:10,680 --> 00:23:14,040 Speaker 1: sort of the early take on this. According to the 366 00:23:14,080 --> 00:23:18,440 Speaker 1: political report, DNC officials argued Democrats this is I'm reading 367 00:23:18,440 --> 00:23:21,560 Speaker 1: directly from the political article. DNC officials argued Democrats didn't 368 00:23:21,560 --> 00:23:25,400 Speaker 1: spend early or consistently enough to engage and persuade voters, 369 00:23:25,560 --> 00:23:28,000 Speaker 1: one of several problems the party faced in twenty twenty four. 370 00:23:28,000 --> 00:23:30,760 Speaker 1: According to the committee, swapping Joe Biden with Kamala Harris 371 00:23:30,760 --> 00:23:33,600 Speaker 1: the top of the ticket intensify those systemic long term 372 00:23:33,640 --> 00:23:35,960 Speaker 1: problems for the party, the official said. And this is 373 00:23:35,960 --> 00:23:38,040 Speaker 1: according to two people that were briefed by the DNC 374 00:23:38,160 --> 00:23:41,919 Speaker 1: this week and granted anonymity to discuss the conversations for 375 00:23:42,000 --> 00:23:45,080 Speaker 1: what it's worth. So far, in these early briefings of 376 00:23:45,119 --> 00:23:47,880 Speaker 1: this after action report, the so called autopsy of twenty 377 00:23:47,920 --> 00:23:50,800 Speaker 1: twenty four by the DNZ, Biden's age has not come 378 00:23:50,880 --> 00:23:54,760 Speaker 1: up now. The DNC officials also said the party's failure 379 00:23:54,800 --> 00:23:57,760 Speaker 1: to respond to voters's top issues led to losses across 380 00:23:57,800 --> 00:24:01,879 Speaker 1: once core constituencies, including class voters. That is one of 381 00:24:01,920 --> 00:24:05,800 Speaker 1: those duh right. When you don't talk about the issue 382 00:24:05,800 --> 00:24:08,359 Speaker 1: that's of most concerned to the voters, you're going to 383 00:24:08,520 --> 00:24:11,000 Speaker 1: likely be on the losing end of an election. I'm 384 00:24:11,040 --> 00:24:13,560 Speaker 1: glad it's taken them eight months to write an autopsy 385 00:24:13,600 --> 00:24:18,399 Speaker 1: to come to that conclusion on that front. Another person 386 00:24:18,400 --> 00:24:20,680 Speaker 1: briefed on the report said that they understood the assessment 387 00:24:20,720 --> 00:24:23,320 Speaker 1: to mean that Democrats quote didn't talk enough about bread 388 00:24:23,320 --> 00:24:26,240 Speaker 1: and butter issues, and instead we talked about social issues, 389 00:24:26,640 --> 00:24:32,480 Speaker 1: social anxieties. Now here's the thing. This idea that the 390 00:24:32,520 --> 00:24:37,959 Speaker 1: Democrats didn't spend early enough actually doesn't fit the facts. 391 00:24:39,119 --> 00:24:43,000 Speaker 1: The Joe back when Biden was still actively running for president, 392 00:24:43,080 --> 00:24:46,439 Speaker 1: their campaign actually bought twenty five million dollars worth of 393 00:24:46,480 --> 00:24:50,800 Speaker 1: ads in September of twenty twenty three. It was earlier 394 00:24:50,840 --> 00:24:54,560 Speaker 1: than either Barack Obama or Donald Trump aired ads during 395 00:24:54,600 --> 00:24:59,120 Speaker 1: their first reelections. They also spent another thirty million dollars 396 00:24:59,160 --> 00:25:02,679 Speaker 1: on ads in March on twenty four So, and they 397 00:25:02,680 --> 00:25:05,200 Speaker 1: were arguing. Biden's team at the time was arguing, according 398 00:25:05,240 --> 00:25:07,879 Speaker 1: to Political that this early investment for activate key voters. 399 00:25:07,920 --> 00:25:10,879 Speaker 1: So I'm confused here the DNC is claiming it was 400 00:25:10,920 --> 00:25:13,920 Speaker 1: too late of investments and money in this idea when 401 00:25:14,200 --> 00:25:18,679 Speaker 1: actually Democrats had the advantage early with money. Look, it 402 00:25:18,720 --> 00:25:21,800 Speaker 1: sounds like this autopsy is going to end up if 403 00:25:21,800 --> 00:25:23,960 Speaker 1: this is what it is, If this is what they concluded, 404 00:25:24,480 --> 00:25:30,080 Speaker 1: then they've it is just a a whole bunch of 405 00:25:30,119 --> 00:25:33,040 Speaker 1: words to not say what the real problem was, which 406 00:25:33,040 --> 00:25:36,480 Speaker 1: is Joe Biden shouldn't have run. Joe Biden didn't have 407 00:25:36,520 --> 00:25:39,920 Speaker 1: the capacity to articulate the message that they needed to do. 408 00:25:40,240 --> 00:25:45,639 Speaker 1: But more importantly, the Biden white House totally disagreed with 409 00:25:45,760 --> 00:25:49,000 Speaker 1: the public on what the top issue was. Remember you 410 00:25:49,040 --> 00:25:52,320 Speaker 1: had the Biden white House putting out surrogates constantly saying, 411 00:25:52,640 --> 00:25:56,080 Speaker 1: the economy is recovering, the economy is great, look at 412 00:25:56,080 --> 00:25:59,119 Speaker 1: all the job creation. And they kept arguing making the 413 00:25:59,280 --> 00:26:03,199 Speaker 1: job create argument, saying, this economy, you know, pay no 414 00:26:03,280 --> 00:26:08,000 Speaker 1: attention to what the rest of the country essentially we don't, 415 00:26:08,200 --> 00:26:10,760 Speaker 1: you know, pay no attention to what you think the 416 00:26:10,840 --> 00:26:13,520 Speaker 1: problem is with the economy, I e. Costs. You should 417 00:26:13,560 --> 00:26:15,720 Speaker 1: listen to us and we'll tell you that the economy 418 00:26:15,800 --> 00:26:20,360 Speaker 1: is okay. I mean it is, so this initial if 419 00:26:20,359 --> 00:26:23,520 Speaker 1: this is really the autopsy, it tells me that they're 420 00:26:23,600 --> 00:26:26,120 Speaker 1: just trying to I don't know Are they protecting people's 421 00:26:26,119 --> 00:26:29,639 Speaker 1: personal feelings or is it just I mean, do you 422 00:26:29,680 --> 00:26:31,679 Speaker 1: need an autopsy to find out you had a candidate 423 00:26:31,760 --> 00:26:35,080 Speaker 1: that wasn't capable of running for president? That was the issue. 424 00:26:35,080 --> 00:26:38,080 Speaker 1: He couldn't sell his agenda, and then more importantly, whoever 425 00:26:38,160 --> 00:26:42,359 Speaker 1: was surrounding him totally misread the did have any clue 426 00:26:42,560 --> 00:26:44,639 Speaker 1: at what the country was upset about, which was the 427 00:26:44,680 --> 00:26:51,680 Speaker 1: cost to live. I don't know what more the autopsy 428 00:26:51,720 --> 00:26:55,160 Speaker 1: should say other than that, and you know, other than 429 00:26:55,280 --> 00:26:56,840 Speaker 1: you know, do they do they want to try to 430 00:26:56,920 --> 00:27:01,240 Speaker 1: light on fire certain consulting groups or people. Obviously a 431 00:27:01,240 --> 00:27:03,479 Speaker 1: whole bunch of people made a whole bunch of money 432 00:27:05,280 --> 00:27:09,520 Speaker 1: based on bad strategy. Okay, that's a fair point. But 433 00:27:09,640 --> 00:27:12,679 Speaker 1: on the other hand, considering how poorly all of this 434 00:27:12,840 --> 00:27:17,320 Speaker 1: was handled, the fact that they came essentially about one 435 00:27:17,400 --> 00:27:19,720 Speaker 1: hundred thousand voters away from winning the electoral college is 436 00:27:19,720 --> 00:27:25,040 Speaker 1: still pretty remarkable. Again, if Kamala Harris simply flips Michigan, Wisconsin, 437 00:27:25,080 --> 00:27:27,359 Speaker 1: and Pennsylvania, she's at two hundred and seventy electoral votes. 438 00:27:28,160 --> 00:27:32,040 Speaker 1: So they're going to release the whole thing. Apparently they're 439 00:27:32,040 --> 00:27:35,880 Speaker 1: going to release the whole thing after this November's elections. 440 00:27:37,760 --> 00:27:42,639 Speaker 1: But it is if this is what the early word is, 441 00:27:42,680 --> 00:27:44,679 Speaker 1: I don't know if anything's going to be learned from this. 442 00:27:46,119 --> 00:27:48,600 Speaker 1: To me, if the autopsy doesn't say, hey, the DNC 443 00:27:48,680 --> 00:27:50,800 Speaker 1: has done a terrible job over the last fifteen years 444 00:27:50,840 --> 00:27:53,960 Speaker 1: in registering voters, then to me, the entire autopsy is 445 00:27:53,960 --> 00:27:57,720 Speaker 1: worthless because that has sort of been one of the 446 00:27:57,760 --> 00:28:01,560 Speaker 1: major problems. The party has had a complete and utter 447 00:28:01,680 --> 00:28:05,880 Speaker 1: dismissiveness of the fact that they were losing voters, basically 448 00:28:05,960 --> 00:28:08,880 Speaker 1: leaking voters for the last decade. And now, of course 449 00:28:08,920 --> 00:28:11,960 Speaker 1: you sort of see the accumulation of lost party registrations 450 00:28:11,960 --> 00:28:15,840 Speaker 1: and it is it is shocking what the numbers are. 451 00:28:16,040 --> 00:28:19,080 Speaker 1: It is almost a ten to one. Look, Republicans have 452 00:28:19,160 --> 00:28:22,720 Speaker 1: lost registered voters over the last few years, and so 453 00:28:22,800 --> 00:28:26,360 Speaker 1: of Democrats. Literally it's a ten to one ratio. Democrats 454 00:28:26,400 --> 00:28:30,000 Speaker 1: are losing ten voters for every one voter the Republicans 455 00:28:30,040 --> 00:28:34,480 Speaker 1: are losing. That is an unsustainable path on that front. 456 00:28:35,080 --> 00:28:42,240 Speaker 1: A few updates on Virginia. It does appear that everybody 457 00:28:42,320 --> 00:28:46,360 Speaker 1: is going to rally around for now, rally around on 458 00:28:46,440 --> 00:28:51,920 Speaker 1: the Democratic side, Jay Jones, I want to read you 459 00:28:52,000 --> 00:28:56,440 Speaker 1: a few statements that A few state Democrats are. They're 460 00:28:56,520 --> 00:29:02,720 Speaker 1: rationales for sticking by for sticking by Jones, the Attorney 461 00:29:02,720 --> 00:29:05,000 Speaker 1: general nominee, who, of course had those text messages that 462 00:29:05,040 --> 00:29:08,880 Speaker 1: were sort of fantasizing about the death of a former 463 00:29:08,920 --> 00:29:14,640 Speaker 1: Assembly speaker's kids. Virginia State Senator Lamont Bagbee, who chairs 464 00:29:14,680 --> 00:29:17,560 Speaker 1: the state's Democratic Party, asked the following question in an 465 00:29:17,600 --> 00:29:22,040 Speaker 1: interview and asked whether Jones should resign, and his response 466 00:29:22,160 --> 00:29:24,400 Speaker 1: was Republicans that are asking him to resign, where were 467 00:29:24,400 --> 00:29:28,440 Speaker 1: they when Trump and other Republicans have made their comments? Ah, 468 00:29:28,480 --> 00:29:33,680 Speaker 1: the old what aboutism defense? And another I want to 469 00:29:33,720 --> 00:29:36,760 Speaker 1: read you one more. West Belamy, a well connected progressive 470 00:29:36,760 --> 00:29:40,320 Speaker 1: activist who teaches at Virginia State University, said the following. 471 00:29:40,360 --> 00:29:42,560 Speaker 1: People on the left feel as if they have to 472 00:29:42,560 --> 00:29:46,120 Speaker 1: be the perfect, highest moral individuals in the world. Normal 473 00:29:46,240 --> 00:29:49,040 Speaker 1: everyday people stay stupid things and text messages online all 474 00:29:49,080 --> 00:29:51,120 Speaker 1: the time. If that is the thing that means the 475 00:29:51,160 --> 00:29:55,520 Speaker 1: Democratic ticket doesn't win the election, then they've got bigger issues. Look, 476 00:29:55,560 --> 00:29:57,080 Speaker 1: I don't think this is going to take down the 477 00:29:57,160 --> 00:29:59,600 Speaker 1: entire Democratic ticket. It probably is only going to take 478 00:29:59,600 --> 00:30:03,520 Speaker 1: down his His own candidacy could make the LG race 479 00:30:03,600 --> 00:30:06,920 Speaker 1: a lot closer, and maybe Spanburger wins by single digits 480 00:30:06,920 --> 00:30:10,000 Speaker 1: and it costs them some opportunities and down the ballot 481 00:30:10,000 --> 00:30:15,560 Speaker 1: and state legislative races and things like that. But this 482 00:30:15,720 --> 00:30:19,480 Speaker 1: public defense, this is exactly what I've been sort of 483 00:30:19,520 --> 00:30:24,320 Speaker 1: ranting about now for a few months, that the rationales 484 00:30:24,360 --> 00:30:30,640 Speaker 1: that many Republicans would use to overlook hateful and violent 485 00:30:30,760 --> 00:30:33,720 Speaker 1: rhetoric from Donald Trump and some of his supporters, and 486 00:30:33,760 --> 00:30:35,680 Speaker 1: the sort of oh, can't you take a joke and 487 00:30:36,000 --> 00:30:43,440 Speaker 1: nobody it's not that serious that the democratic defense of 488 00:30:43,480 --> 00:30:46,560 Speaker 1: when somebody on their side sort of behaves similarly as well, 489 00:30:46,720 --> 00:30:48,520 Speaker 1: is now going to go to the same thing. Is 490 00:30:48,520 --> 00:30:50,600 Speaker 1: that really the answer? I go back to the whole 491 00:30:50,640 --> 00:30:52,520 Speaker 1: golden rule. Right, you do unto others as you want 492 00:30:52,520 --> 00:30:55,600 Speaker 1: done under you. Right. And the Texas governor has decided 493 00:30:55,680 --> 00:30:58,640 Speaker 1: he is going to trounce on the tenth Amendment when 494 00:30:58,640 --> 00:31:00,640 Speaker 1: it comes to the state of Illinois. But he has 495 00:31:00,760 --> 00:31:05,520 Speaker 1: no apparently he is not worried about Texas's rights being 496 00:31:05,560 --> 00:31:11,840 Speaker 1: trampled upon if the roles were reversed. Okay, didn't hear right? 497 00:31:12,080 --> 00:31:15,720 Speaker 1: You know, if we are trying to tone the rhetoric down, 498 00:31:15,760 --> 00:31:18,360 Speaker 1: then somebody's got to got to take the high ground here, 499 00:31:18,640 --> 00:31:21,480 Speaker 1: somebody's got to want to have some moral authority here, 500 00:31:22,040 --> 00:31:27,720 Speaker 1: and these defenses and look, in fairness, not many well 501 00:31:27,800 --> 00:31:30,320 Speaker 1: known Democrats are willing to stick by and make the 502 00:31:30,360 --> 00:31:33,760 Speaker 1: defense like that. But that mindset, and I know it's 503 00:31:33,760 --> 00:31:35,560 Speaker 1: there in the base of the party. I get it. 504 00:31:35,600 --> 00:31:37,960 Speaker 1: They look at what the Republican, what Trump and his 505 00:31:38,480 --> 00:31:41,840 Speaker 1: minions get away with and think, geez, it doesn't hurt them, 506 00:31:41,960 --> 00:31:44,480 Speaker 1: So why do we care so much about it? And 507 00:31:44,520 --> 00:31:48,000 Speaker 1: I'm like, there's still a vast chunk in the middle 508 00:31:48,040 --> 00:31:51,680 Speaker 1: who do care about ethics, who do care a little 509 00:31:51,720 --> 00:31:57,600 Speaker 1: bit about character, who do want somebody to try to 510 00:31:57,840 --> 00:32:00,600 Speaker 1: pretend to be a role model for doing this the 511 00:32:00,680 --> 00:32:03,600 Speaker 1: right way instead of the wrong way. So you know, 512 00:32:03,760 --> 00:32:08,680 Speaker 1: I'm sort of shaking my head, but I will I 513 00:32:09,200 --> 00:32:14,400 Speaker 1: would be a little leary Democrats of giving up the 514 00:32:14,600 --> 00:32:17,520 Speaker 1: adult in the room voter, who I do believe they've 515 00:32:17,560 --> 00:32:20,800 Speaker 1: had an inside track on essentially during most of the 516 00:32:20,840 --> 00:32:24,920 Speaker 1: Trump era. But if you can't beat them join a mindset, 517 00:32:25,280 --> 00:32:28,560 Speaker 1: I don't know what happens. Then you don't know where 518 00:32:28,560 --> 00:32:31,480 Speaker 1: this goes. There's a go third party, does it go splintering? 519 00:32:31,520 --> 00:32:34,680 Speaker 1: There's a lot of ways that this could go. A 520 00:32:34,720 --> 00:32:36,920 Speaker 1: few campaign notes before we get to the interview with Paul, 521 00:32:41,280 --> 00:32:43,240 Speaker 1: I think we have another Democrat to add to the 522 00:32:43,240 --> 00:32:46,760 Speaker 1: presidential list. So we told you Andy Basheer has been 523 00:32:46,800 --> 00:32:48,880 Speaker 1: in New Hampshire. He was just there this week. I 524 00:32:48,960 --> 00:32:51,560 Speaker 1: told you there was already a pro Palestinian group running 525 00:32:51,560 --> 00:32:54,960 Speaker 1: an attack ad on Bashir. Sort of an early warning shot. 526 00:32:54,960 --> 00:32:56,760 Speaker 1: I think to all presidential candidates that there are going 527 00:32:56,840 --> 00:32:58,520 Speaker 1: to be some activist groups that are going to want 528 00:32:58,520 --> 00:33:02,880 Speaker 1: to make Israel and arming Israel e litmus test. Well, 529 00:33:03,920 --> 00:33:08,120 Speaker 1: we've got additional Democrats on the schedule in New Hampshire. 530 00:33:08,160 --> 00:33:11,520 Speaker 1: Chris Murphy. I think many people already knew the Connecticut 531 00:33:11,560 --> 00:33:14,320 Speaker 1: Democratic senator was sort of at least toying with a 532 00:33:14,440 --> 00:33:16,520 Speaker 1: national campaign in twenty twenty eight. He's going to do 533 00:33:16,560 --> 00:33:20,400 Speaker 1: a town all in New Hampshire November twelve. But Alyssa Slockton, 534 00:33:20,880 --> 00:33:24,400 Speaker 1: the first term senator from Michigan, is going to headline 535 00:33:24,480 --> 00:33:29,040 Speaker 1: a fundraiser for the Manchester Democratic Dinner on October fifteenth. 536 00:33:29,400 --> 00:33:32,440 Speaker 1: As my friend Chris Eliza likes to say, you know, 537 00:33:32,520 --> 00:33:34,880 Speaker 1: nobody shows up to ior in New Hampshire by accident 538 00:33:35,280 --> 00:33:38,640 Speaker 1: without at least you know, they're kicking the tires on something. 539 00:33:39,160 --> 00:33:45,040 Speaker 1: And what's interesting about Slockton is this is she's doing 540 00:33:45,080 --> 00:33:49,040 Speaker 1: this within about two weeks of Gretchen Whitmer, the term 541 00:33:49,120 --> 00:33:52,760 Speaker 1: limited governor of Michigan, sort of indicating that she's probably 542 00:33:52,800 --> 00:33:54,480 Speaker 1: not going to run for president in twenty twenty eight. 543 00:33:54,920 --> 00:33:59,240 Speaker 1: That's that she hopes to be participating in what's next, 544 00:33:59,280 --> 00:34:02,920 Speaker 1: but that she probably wouldn't be at the top of 545 00:34:03,000 --> 00:34:09,840 Speaker 1: the ticket herself. Is this is this coincidence? Is this related? 546 00:34:10,120 --> 00:34:14,799 Speaker 1: Let's just say inquiring minds want to know. And a 547 00:34:14,840 --> 00:34:17,120 Speaker 1: few other California notes. I was just out in California. 548 00:34:17,320 --> 00:34:19,640 Speaker 1: First of all, it does look like the redistricting effort 549 00:34:20,080 --> 00:34:24,120 Speaker 1: it is. I think Gavin Newsom's gonna win this prop. 550 00:34:24,719 --> 00:34:28,440 Speaker 1: It looks like they've successfully turned this into a referendum 551 00:34:28,440 --> 00:34:31,919 Speaker 1: on Trump, which was the way to win this. 552 00:34:32,840 --> 00:34:32,960 Speaker 2: Uh. 553 00:34:33,560 --> 00:34:36,600 Speaker 1: And it also looks like money is drying up on 554 00:34:36,719 --> 00:34:39,399 Speaker 1: the No side of things. Kevin McCarthy, according to punch 555 00:34:39,440 --> 00:34:42,560 Speaker 1: Bull News, who had pledged to raise and spend one 556 00:34:42,600 --> 00:34:45,880 Speaker 1: hundred million dollars to try to defeat the proposition in 557 00:34:45,920 --> 00:34:48,360 Speaker 1: the November elections, has so far only been able to 558 00:34:48,360 --> 00:34:51,239 Speaker 1: spend seven million, So it does seem as if that 559 00:34:51,400 --> 00:34:54,160 Speaker 1: it's possible. Some money is drying up. So if you're 560 00:34:54,440 --> 00:34:58,080 Speaker 1: you're if you're keeping track of the redistricting wars, so 561 00:34:58,239 --> 00:35:00,239 Speaker 1: if California is going to happen, and Tech this is 562 00:35:00,280 --> 00:35:02,720 Speaker 1: going to happen, they've canceled each other out. So now 563 00:35:03,160 --> 00:35:07,200 Speaker 1: it becomes this sort of knife fight one by one. 564 00:35:07,480 --> 00:35:10,960 Speaker 1: So we're gonna have Missouri, you might have Indiana. Then 565 00:35:11,000 --> 00:35:14,719 Speaker 1: there's the Utah redraw. There could be now a Maryland redraw. 566 00:35:17,040 --> 00:35:20,400 Speaker 1: Does Florida get into the game, right, There is another 567 00:35:20,480 --> 00:35:24,360 Speaker 1: potential seat or two they could attempt in Broward County, 568 00:35:25,080 --> 00:35:27,680 Speaker 1: if you remember my interview with Jared Moskowitz, even w 569 00:35:27,840 --> 00:35:31,040 Speaker 1: Wasserman Schultz's district, they think maybe they could they sort 570 00:35:31,040 --> 00:35:34,160 Speaker 1: of stretch it across Alligator Alley and essentially try to 571 00:35:34,200 --> 00:35:38,399 Speaker 1: create districts that would have nothing in common. I mean, 572 00:35:38,440 --> 00:35:41,160 Speaker 1: trust me, growing up in South Florida, you know, the 573 00:35:41,520 --> 00:35:46,920 Speaker 1: Fort Myers and Fort Lauderdale have nothing in common that 574 00:35:47,040 --> 00:35:49,319 Speaker 1: much other than one's on water and the others on water. 575 00:35:49,400 --> 00:35:51,120 Speaker 1: But one's on an ocean and one's in a gulf. 576 00:35:51,280 --> 00:35:54,360 Speaker 1: Right it is, but it is too far away to 577 00:35:54,800 --> 00:35:58,200 Speaker 1: call it a community of interest, but that doesn't mean 578 00:35:58,600 --> 00:36:01,880 Speaker 1: that isn't how they might attempt to draw the map 579 00:36:01,920 --> 00:36:04,800 Speaker 1: and make a couple of Democrats in the Broward County 580 00:36:05,120 --> 00:36:08,839 Speaker 1: area a little more a little more vulnerable. But if 581 00:36:08,880 --> 00:36:15,120 Speaker 1: we do have sort of this standoff between California and Texas, 582 00:36:15,760 --> 00:36:18,879 Speaker 1: then it probably means at best Republicans are gonna net 583 00:36:19,120 --> 00:36:22,279 Speaker 1: maybe three or four I think max out of this 584 00:36:22,480 --> 00:36:27,880 Speaker 1: redistricting effort now in an extraordinarily close midterm election, that 585 00:36:27,880 --> 00:36:31,800 Speaker 1: could be the difference. And if it is that close, 586 00:36:31,840 --> 00:36:35,080 Speaker 1: and to me, Democrats already have lost, right if they 587 00:36:35,320 --> 00:36:38,400 Speaker 1: if they can't make this where they're sort of winning 588 00:36:38,440 --> 00:36:42,319 Speaker 1: the national argument, you know, in the generic ballot five six, 589 00:36:42,480 --> 00:36:47,319 Speaker 1: seven points, well then you know we're going to be 590 00:36:47,440 --> 00:36:51,720 Speaker 1: looking at, you know, two or three seats on either side. 591 00:36:51,880 --> 00:36:55,319 Speaker 1: And speaking of California, I think what's notable if you're 592 00:36:55,320 --> 00:36:58,000 Speaker 1: listening to this podcast, my guess is you've already seen 593 00:36:58,880 --> 00:37:02,759 Speaker 1: the Katie Porter, the former member of Congress who lost 594 00:37:02,760 --> 00:37:07,640 Speaker 1: a Senate campaign against Adam Schiff, has been the nominal 595 00:37:07,680 --> 00:37:11,080 Speaker 1: front runner for governor ever since Kulanakis got out of 596 00:37:11,080 --> 00:37:13,440 Speaker 1: the race and Kamala Harris announced she wasn't going to run, 597 00:37:13,840 --> 00:37:15,720 Speaker 1: so Katie Bore has kind of been the front runner. 598 00:37:15,760 --> 00:37:17,600 Speaker 1: I've never really thought of her as the frontrunner because 599 00:37:17,640 --> 00:37:19,760 Speaker 1: I think Rick Caruso, the guy who lost the mayor's 600 00:37:19,840 --> 00:37:22,920 Speaker 1: race to Karen Bass in LA, when he jumps in, 601 00:37:23,080 --> 00:37:27,800 Speaker 1: he was likely going to be the new front runner 602 00:37:28,239 --> 00:37:29,840 Speaker 1: when he gets in. My guess is he gets in 603 00:37:29,880 --> 00:37:33,839 Speaker 1: after the November elections. But for now, Porter had been 604 00:37:33,880 --> 00:37:35,560 Speaker 1: the one. She had the most name ID from her 605 00:37:35,600 --> 00:37:39,200 Speaker 1: previous campaign for Senate, so she'd been ahead, but she 606 00:37:39,320 --> 00:37:40,920 Speaker 1: was like in the twenties, you know in some of 607 00:37:40,960 --> 00:37:45,319 Speaker 1: these polls. Well, anyway, that the viral interview, I'm not 608 00:37:45,320 --> 00:37:47,839 Speaker 1: going to sort of describe it in detail because it's 609 00:37:47,880 --> 00:37:50,600 Speaker 1: been everywhere. I think what's notable is how much both 610 00:37:50,640 --> 00:37:55,480 Speaker 1: Republicans and Democrats piled on this. Plenty of us who 611 00:37:55,560 --> 00:37:59,840 Speaker 1: have covered Katie Porter, covered Congress, covered the California delegation, 612 00:38:00,080 --> 00:38:03,640 Speaker 1: and have known that she's not very popular among Democrats. 613 00:38:03,760 --> 00:38:06,680 Speaker 1: You know, she may be popular among MSNBC viewers and 614 00:38:06,760 --> 00:38:11,720 Speaker 1: among many progressive activists, but among the sort of insider crowd, 615 00:38:12,719 --> 00:38:15,000 Speaker 1: she wasn't very popular, and not because of her stances, 616 00:38:15,040 --> 00:38:17,520 Speaker 1: but sort of because of her attitude. It's sort of 617 00:38:17,520 --> 00:38:20,759 Speaker 1: how she went about it. You know, she's in some 618 00:38:20,840 --> 00:38:25,560 Speaker 1: ways what's good outsider politics is not always good insider camaraderie. 619 00:38:26,120 --> 00:38:28,880 Speaker 1: And frankly, if you're going to be governor, you got 620 00:38:29,000 --> 00:38:32,600 Speaker 1: to you gotta work with other people. I think her 621 00:38:33,080 --> 00:38:38,000 Speaker 1: inability to handle what wasn't tough questions, these weren't hard questions, 622 00:38:39,200 --> 00:38:41,680 Speaker 1: it makes me wonder has she spent too much time 623 00:38:41,719 --> 00:38:45,400 Speaker 1: in a blue safe space when she interacts with maybe 624 00:38:45,480 --> 00:38:50,640 Speaker 1: blue leaning media that don't challenge her, and these were 625 00:38:50,719 --> 00:38:54,560 Speaker 1: lightly challenging questions. I mean, no, I'm not disrespecting the 626 00:38:54,600 --> 00:38:57,040 Speaker 1: reporter at all. I think the reporter it's clear what 627 00:38:57,160 --> 00:38:59,239 Speaker 1: she was doing. She was doing a larger package and 628 00:38:59,280 --> 00:39:01,680 Speaker 1: talking to all the candidates. You know, I think she 629 00:39:01,760 --> 00:39:07,319 Speaker 1: made that, made that pretty clear. But you want to 630 00:39:07,320 --> 00:39:12,239 Speaker 1: be governor of the world's fifth largest economy and you 631 00:39:12,280 --> 00:39:16,600 Speaker 1: can't handle a tiny bit of a tiny bit of 632 00:39:16,640 --> 00:39:19,960 Speaker 1: a follow up question about Trump voters and you sort 633 00:39:20,000 --> 00:39:22,439 Speaker 1: of lose it really quickly. I mean, you're not gonna 634 00:39:22,440 --> 00:39:25,279 Speaker 1: be able to control every setting in politics no matter 635 00:39:25,280 --> 00:39:28,160 Speaker 1: where you go. So but the most notable thing about 636 00:39:28,160 --> 00:39:30,920 Speaker 1: this is not the incident itself. To me, it's how 637 00:39:31,000 --> 00:39:35,560 Speaker 1: much everybody else piled on. She does not have a 638 00:39:35,600 --> 00:39:39,839 Speaker 1: reservoir of goodwill inside the Democratic Party, it seems. And 639 00:39:39,880 --> 00:39:43,680 Speaker 1: I think the way she behaved after losing, after not 640 00:39:43,800 --> 00:39:46,719 Speaker 1: making it into the top two with Adam Shift in 641 00:39:46,760 --> 00:39:50,680 Speaker 1: the Senate race, and you know, she she just she didn't, 642 00:39:50,800 --> 00:39:54,520 Speaker 1: you know, she was angry that Adam Schiff played to win. Right, 643 00:39:54,640 --> 00:39:59,680 Speaker 1: So Adam Schiff spent money promoting Steve Garvey during that 644 00:39:59,760 --> 00:40:03,880 Speaker 1: prime process so that Garvy would be seen as the 645 00:40:03,960 --> 00:40:08,280 Speaker 1: chief Republican opposition to Shift. And so that way the 646 00:40:08,320 --> 00:40:11,640 Speaker 1: top two face off would be Shift versus Garvey. D 647 00:40:11,800 --> 00:40:15,920 Speaker 1: versus are very easy campaign for Shift to win, rather 648 00:40:15,960 --> 00:40:18,640 Speaker 1: than Shift versus Porter, which would have been D versus 649 00:40:18,760 --> 00:40:24,359 Speaker 1: D might have been very awkward and a much closer race, 650 00:40:24,480 --> 00:40:26,680 Speaker 1: much more competitive, and we don't know which way it 651 00:40:26,680 --> 00:40:29,640 Speaker 1: would go. Obviously, Porter was still very bitter about it, 652 00:40:30,040 --> 00:40:31,960 Speaker 1: and sort of the way she went about it, you know, 653 00:40:31,960 --> 00:40:35,640 Speaker 1: it was sort of like sour grapes that Adam Shift 654 00:40:35,719 --> 00:40:40,680 Speaker 1: did something, you know, did a campaign tactic that is 655 00:40:40,719 --> 00:40:45,000 Speaker 1: not new, not that controversial anymore. It's sort of how 656 00:40:45,080 --> 00:40:48,200 Speaker 1: you you know, he had the resources to do it, 657 00:40:49,520 --> 00:40:52,879 Speaker 1: and because she didn't have the same resources in him. 658 00:40:52,960 --> 00:40:57,320 Speaker 1: She was frustrated that he got to have more impact 659 00:40:57,600 --> 00:41:01,680 Speaker 1: on who he got to run against than she could. 660 00:41:02,760 --> 00:41:06,839 Speaker 1: And so I do think that how she how she 661 00:41:07,080 --> 00:41:12,680 Speaker 1: carried herself in losing that primary didn't exactly win her 662 00:41:12,719 --> 00:41:17,000 Speaker 1: a lot of friends outside of her core base of supporters. 663 00:41:17,000 --> 00:41:21,920 Speaker 1: So this was a red flag and probably probably the 664 00:41:21,960 --> 00:41:24,839 Speaker 1: type of thing that will be hard for her to 665 00:41:24,840 --> 00:41:29,720 Speaker 1: to shake off, especially since how how easily everybody seemed 666 00:41:29,719 --> 00:41:35,440 Speaker 1: to pile onto her on that. One other interesting nugget 667 00:41:35,480 --> 00:41:36,520 Speaker 1: I want to put out there before I get to 668 00:41:36,560 --> 00:41:41,359 Speaker 1: glassters fashion Cure a long time political consultant. He ran 669 00:41:41,400 --> 00:41:47,320 Speaker 1: Bernie Sanders' camp campaign for president in twenty twenty. He's 670 00:41:47,640 --> 00:41:51,640 Speaker 1: right now aligned with the video, the progressive leaning video 671 00:41:51,920 --> 00:41:55,319 Speaker 1: More Perfect Union. They do some really good work. Yes, 672 00:41:55,360 --> 00:42:00,560 Speaker 1: it's it's sort of advocacy journalism. But what's interesting is 673 00:42:00,600 --> 00:42:04,480 Speaker 1: he was very critical of what he thought Democrats were 674 00:42:04,480 --> 00:42:07,759 Speaker 1: doing when it came to short form video. You know, 675 00:42:07,800 --> 00:42:10,880 Speaker 1: he was saying that while people like Gavin Newsom, and 676 00:42:10,960 --> 00:42:14,560 Speaker 1: you've seen Akim Jeffreys and Chuck Schumer all doing more 677 00:42:14,640 --> 00:42:17,600 Speaker 1: videos themselves, trying to talk to voters sort of explaining 678 00:42:17,600 --> 00:42:21,360 Speaker 1: different policies that he thinks it's not worked, and he 679 00:42:21,440 --> 00:42:26,200 Speaker 1: thinks that if you want more effective viral videos, you've 680 00:42:26,200 --> 00:42:29,480 Speaker 1: got to talk to people who's actually impacted by the situation. 681 00:42:29,560 --> 00:42:34,920 Speaker 1: And he noted the he said, the raw, emotionally jarring 682 00:42:35,000 --> 00:42:39,520 Speaker 1: clips of human suffering and Gaza and the outrages videos 683 00:42:39,520 --> 00:42:43,719 Speaker 1: of ice agents separating families, that those videos go more 684 00:42:43,840 --> 00:42:47,680 Speaker 1: viral than when a politician is telling you what they think, 685 00:42:48,320 --> 00:42:50,600 Speaker 1: and as he said, those clips have done more to 686 00:42:50,680 --> 00:42:53,440 Speaker 1: change public opinion on those issues than anything else. His 687 00:42:53,560 --> 00:42:59,040 Speaker 1: point is, real people are who you should be featuring 688 00:42:59,080 --> 00:43:01,439 Speaker 1: when you're trying to make a point on the cost 689 00:43:01,520 --> 00:43:05,560 Speaker 1: to live, on the impact of healthcare subsidies going away, 690 00:43:06,120 --> 00:43:09,520 Speaker 1: or the impact of no childcare tax credit, things like that. 691 00:43:10,120 --> 00:43:14,160 Speaker 1: And this goes back to some politics never change. Right. 692 00:43:15,280 --> 00:43:19,680 Speaker 1: If you make your campaign about the people you're trying 693 00:43:19,760 --> 00:43:22,800 Speaker 1: to convince to vote for you, they're more likely to listen. 694 00:43:23,200 --> 00:43:26,280 Speaker 1: If you make the campaign essentially about your own ideology 695 00:43:26,400 --> 00:43:29,000 Speaker 1: or your own views and you're trying to persuade others 696 00:43:29,360 --> 00:43:33,080 Speaker 1: to come to your side, you're more likely to be losing. 697 00:43:34,800 --> 00:43:38,160 Speaker 1: And so I just thought that deserved a highlight. I 698 00:43:38,239 --> 00:43:41,359 Speaker 1: caught what he had to say, and I thought it 699 00:43:41,400 --> 00:43:44,080 Speaker 1: was something worth pointing out. All right, So we're there. 700 00:43:45,120 --> 00:43:46,920 Speaker 1: We'll sneak in a break for those of you listening 701 00:43:46,960 --> 00:43:52,040 Speaker 1: to the full download here, My friend Paul Glasters on 702 00:43:52,200 --> 00:44:10,120 Speaker 1: college affordability is next. So joining me now is somebody 703 00:44:10,160 --> 00:44:12,480 Speaker 1: for many of us of a certain age in Washington 704 00:44:12,600 --> 00:44:16,000 Speaker 1: is that I would deem an institution. It's Paul Glasters, 705 00:44:16,080 --> 00:44:19,480 Speaker 1: the editor in chief of the Washington Monthly. Many of 706 00:44:19,560 --> 00:44:23,640 Speaker 1: us count the Washington Monthly as one of the first 707 00:44:23,719 --> 00:44:28,600 Speaker 1: magazines that published us. That would be me. So when 708 00:44:28,600 --> 00:44:31,560 Speaker 1: I started seeing could I do this? Could I write 709 00:44:31,640 --> 00:44:34,160 Speaker 1: long form? After all of my sort of wire copy 710 00:44:34,520 --> 00:44:37,040 Speaker 1: years at the National Journal and doing the hotline. And 711 00:44:37,960 --> 00:44:43,040 Speaker 1: Paul was an extraordinarily generous editor and a great mentor 712 00:44:43,080 --> 00:44:45,880 Speaker 1: to a lot of writers and reporters around Washington. So 713 00:44:45,960 --> 00:44:47,359 Speaker 1: this is a real treat for me. Paul. 714 00:44:47,360 --> 00:44:49,799 Speaker 2: It's good to see you, Chuck. What a pleasure. Thanks 715 00:44:49,800 --> 00:44:51,959 Speaker 2: for having me on. And I remember that story well 716 00:44:52,600 --> 00:44:53,319 Speaker 2: by John Carry. 717 00:44:53,360 --> 00:44:58,680 Speaker 1: I think, yes, yes it was, and so I have 718 00:44:58,719 --> 00:45:01,640 Speaker 1: you on because you did something that I love, and 719 00:45:01,680 --> 00:45:04,680 Speaker 1: it's something frankly that I remember the Obama administration wanted 720 00:45:04,719 --> 00:45:07,960 Speaker 1: to make a bigger deal out of which was how 721 00:45:08,000 --> 00:45:13,040 Speaker 1: can we create a list of best colleges for bang 722 00:45:13,120 --> 00:45:17,160 Speaker 1: for your buck? Essentially, you know what's going to provide 723 00:45:17,160 --> 00:45:20,600 Speaker 1: you the education that you need without making you have 724 00:45:20,719 --> 00:45:23,120 Speaker 1: to go into debt for the rest of your life 725 00:45:23,480 --> 00:45:26,520 Speaker 1: or to do blood oaths to people that maybe you 726 00:45:26,560 --> 00:45:28,799 Speaker 1: don't want to give blood oaths too, because you want 727 00:45:28,800 --> 00:45:32,440 Speaker 1: to get into this Ivy League university, that Ivy League university. 728 00:45:32,880 --> 00:45:35,640 Speaker 1: I will note the irony that you once worked at 729 00:45:35,719 --> 00:45:39,680 Speaker 1: US News and now you have a competing list. But 730 00:45:39,800 --> 00:45:42,520 Speaker 1: this is and look where I want to talk about 731 00:45:42,560 --> 00:45:45,680 Speaker 1: the future of journalism and and sort of and where 732 00:45:45,680 --> 00:45:49,360 Speaker 1: that goes too. But talk to me about the decision 733 00:45:49,400 --> 00:45:52,759 Speaker 1: to do this list and for the Washington Monthly, and 734 00:45:53,160 --> 00:45:56,880 Speaker 1: how would you describe it and what what what motivated 735 00:45:56,880 --> 00:45:57,399 Speaker 1: you to do it? 736 00:45:58,640 --> 00:46:02,000 Speaker 2: Well, you're right that that I used to work at 737 00:46:02,080 --> 00:46:06,080 Speaker 2: US News and the US News college rankings paid my 738 00:46:06,160 --> 00:46:09,279 Speaker 2: mortgage all of us Right, there was always a kind 739 00:46:09,280 --> 00:46:15,560 Speaker 2: of undercurrent of concern about the adequacy of the numbers. 740 00:46:16,400 --> 00:46:22,080 Speaker 2: And when my friend Jim Follows became the editor, he 741 00:46:22,920 --> 00:46:30,120 Speaker 2: commissioned internal study by a very reputable organization that found 742 00:46:30,400 --> 00:46:33,600 Speaker 2: that the use of their metrics. I think the quote 743 00:46:33,640 --> 00:46:38,799 Speaker 2: was something like made no logical or methodological sense. And 744 00:46:38,840 --> 00:46:42,680 Speaker 2: when he reported this to the owner, Mort Zuckerman of 745 00:46:42,719 --> 00:46:47,319 Speaker 2: the US News, and this was the major revenue driver 746 00:46:47,440 --> 00:46:51,759 Speaker 2: of the publication, Jim was shortly escorted out the door. 747 00:46:53,280 --> 00:46:56,880 Speaker 2: And uh, it was not too long after that. I 748 00:46:57,280 --> 00:47:00,680 Speaker 2: quit when Jim was fired. And it was a couple 749 00:47:00,719 --> 00:47:04,840 Speaker 2: of years later that, miraculously who knows that internal study 750 00:47:05,040 --> 00:47:09,919 Speaker 2: made its way into the Washington Monthly, and we did 751 00:47:10,000 --> 00:47:13,720 Speaker 2: a couple of deep dive investigative pieces about US News 752 00:47:14,360 --> 00:47:18,040 Speaker 2: and I determined the idea of ranking colleges is fine, 753 00:47:18,640 --> 00:47:23,560 Speaker 2: right often, how dare you rank colleges? Nobody could compare us? Well, 754 00:47:23,560 --> 00:47:26,839 Speaker 2: you know, we ranked football teams, we ranked students, we 755 00:47:26,960 --> 00:47:31,800 Speaker 2: rank colleges. But that basically US News does it in 756 00:47:32,320 --> 00:47:35,160 Speaker 2: a kind of a horrific way. And I'm going to 757 00:47:35,239 --> 00:47:40,920 Speaker 2: simplify their metrics, but it's basically this. They reward colleges 758 00:47:41,280 --> 00:47:46,000 Speaker 2: in their metrics for three things. Number one, exclusivity. How 759 00:47:46,280 --> 00:47:49,960 Speaker 2: few students do you let in? It's sort of the 760 00:47:50,040 --> 00:47:53,240 Speaker 2: idea that you know, college is like a country club 761 00:47:54,320 --> 00:48:01,120 Speaker 2: lectures instead of golf and velvet rope. Yeah, and you know, 762 00:48:02,360 --> 00:48:04,080 Speaker 2: which is kind of wacky when you think about it. 763 00:48:04,080 --> 00:48:08,680 Speaker 2: If you few restaurants, they don't count country clubs, right, 764 00:48:08,760 --> 00:48:10,640 Speaker 2: they say, the best restaurant in the city is this 765 00:48:10,680 --> 00:48:12,960 Speaker 2: country club. Well, I can't get into that country club. 766 00:48:13,080 --> 00:48:15,000 Speaker 2: Why are you telling me this? It's kind of useless 767 00:48:15,040 --> 00:48:18,879 Speaker 2: information to anybody who isn't you know, at the very 768 00:48:19,000 --> 00:48:23,600 Speaker 2: upper level of the SAT range. And you know the 769 00:48:23,640 --> 00:48:27,800 Speaker 2: way that thing works out. It's mostly people from affluent, 770 00:48:27,880 --> 00:48:30,080 Speaker 2: wealthy families who go to the best high schools, who 771 00:48:30,120 --> 00:48:32,239 Speaker 2: have years of prep. Those are the ones again into 772 00:48:32,239 --> 00:48:36,839 Speaker 2: the IVY League. So for ninety percent of Americans, they 773 00:48:36,840 --> 00:48:40,040 Speaker 2: don't even consider those schools. They're not for them, right, 774 00:48:40,560 --> 00:48:45,239 Speaker 2: So exclusivity is how US News And there's about a 775 00:48:45,280 --> 00:48:47,680 Speaker 2: dozen other rankings out there, and they all, almost all 776 00:48:47,680 --> 00:48:49,880 Speaker 2: of them do the same thing. They say, who do 777 00:48:49,920 --> 00:48:52,520 Speaker 2: you How many people can you say no to? That 778 00:48:52,600 --> 00:48:56,200 Speaker 2: must be you're good. The second thing they reward is 779 00:48:56,280 --> 00:48:59,680 Speaker 2: spending is wealth. How much money do we spend on 780 00:48:59,719 --> 00:49:04,120 Speaker 2: our students? Which if you're only mostly letting in wealthy students, 781 00:49:04,160 --> 00:49:06,040 Speaker 2: you got a lot of money, right, so you can 782 00:49:06,480 --> 00:49:11,759 Speaker 2: spend money. And then the third is reputation. US News 783 00:49:11,760 --> 00:49:15,440 Speaker 2: does this survey of college leaders and they ask you, 784 00:49:15,520 --> 00:49:17,680 Speaker 2: what do you think of that other college, as if 785 00:49:17,680 --> 00:49:19,440 Speaker 2: that leader knows anything about what's going on in the 786 00:49:19,560 --> 00:49:22,759 Speaker 2: classroom a thousand miles away. But it's sort of like, 787 00:49:22,840 --> 00:49:24,920 Speaker 2: you know, high school, who are the cool kids? Everybody 788 00:49:24,920 --> 00:49:27,200 Speaker 2: else's cool kids are, So the cool kids are the 789 00:49:27,200 --> 00:49:31,280 Speaker 2: cool kids because everybody says they're the cool kids. We said, 790 00:49:31,719 --> 00:49:35,080 Speaker 2: these are really terrible metrics. They're not useful for most students, 791 00:49:35,200 --> 00:49:36,640 Speaker 2: and they're very bad for the country. 792 00:49:36,719 --> 00:49:36,919 Speaker 1: Right. 793 00:49:37,280 --> 00:49:44,640 Speaker 2: They drive inequality, they drive snobbery, they drive expense, They 794 00:49:44,680 --> 00:49:49,640 Speaker 2: make college more expensive. Every college president and system wants 795 00:49:49,680 --> 00:49:52,120 Speaker 2: their college to go hire on the US News list. 796 00:49:52,480 --> 00:49:54,279 Speaker 2: And so they wellt's throw some more money at it. 797 00:49:54,360 --> 00:49:57,200 Speaker 2: Let's tell you know, our constituct our students. No, you 798 00:49:57,200 --> 00:50:01,160 Speaker 2: can't get in. Let's deny people at education. It's crazy. 799 00:50:02,360 --> 00:50:05,160 Speaker 2: So we said, all right. I actually hired the woman 800 00:50:05,680 --> 00:50:09,400 Speaker 2: who had done the study right for Jim Follows, and 801 00:50:09,440 --> 00:50:12,280 Speaker 2: I said, help me design a different set of rankings. 802 00:50:12,719 --> 00:50:16,760 Speaker 2: And so we said, what is it that the average person, 803 00:50:18,239 --> 00:50:21,440 Speaker 2: not the most affluent people, not people who went to Harvard, 804 00:50:21,800 --> 00:50:25,440 Speaker 2: but the average person wants out of their investment in 805 00:50:25,520 --> 00:50:28,120 Speaker 2: higher education. And when I say investment, I don't just 806 00:50:28,160 --> 00:50:33,520 Speaker 2: mean tuition dollars. I mean your tax dollars. Government at 807 00:50:33,560 --> 00:50:36,520 Speaker 2: every level Chuck spends half a trillion dollars a year 808 00:50:36,920 --> 00:50:41,000 Speaker 2: on higher ED. That is seventeen hundred dollars out of 809 00:50:41,080 --> 00:50:42,960 Speaker 2: pocket for the average taxpayer. 810 00:50:43,200 --> 00:50:45,520 Speaker 1: Right, whether you go, whether they go to college or not, 811 00:50:45,760 --> 00:50:49,759 Speaker 1: they have contributed, Right, They've contributed. 812 00:50:49,239 --> 00:50:52,800 Speaker 2: Dollars to the colleges, providing some value for the country 813 00:50:52,840 --> 00:50:56,319 Speaker 2: and for ourselves specifically. So what is that value? And 814 00:50:56,360 --> 00:50:59,799 Speaker 2: so we came up with three alternative metrics. Number one, 815 00:51:00,160 --> 00:51:03,839 Speaker 2: what you alluded to best bang for your buck upward mobility? 816 00:51:04,800 --> 00:51:10,440 Speaker 2: Does a college recruit and graduate students of modest means? Right, 817 00:51:10,600 --> 00:51:13,720 Speaker 2: working class students, middle class students, boards students. 818 00:51:13,400 --> 00:51:15,719 Speaker 1: First gen basically first gen college? 819 00:51:15,800 --> 00:51:19,720 Speaker 2: Right? Does it recruit and graduate students of modest means 820 00:51:20,040 --> 00:51:23,040 Speaker 2: with degrees that don't cost too much, don't load them 821 00:51:23,040 --> 00:51:26,560 Speaker 2: down with debt, and that means something in the market 822 00:51:27,000 --> 00:51:30,320 Speaker 2: such that they earn middle class or better incomes. 823 00:51:30,680 --> 00:51:33,359 Speaker 1: They've moved up. The latter they're making more money than 824 00:51:33,400 --> 00:51:34,880 Speaker 1: their parents exactly. 825 00:51:35,280 --> 00:51:42,120 Speaker 2: Number two research, Do colleges create the scholarship and scholars 826 00:51:42,560 --> 00:51:50,560 Speaker 2: that drive new economic growth, solutions to global problems, you know, 827 00:51:50,680 --> 00:51:55,480 Speaker 2: cures for diseases, et cetera. And number three, what we 828 00:51:55,600 --> 00:52:00,319 Speaker 2: call service. Open up the mission statement of just about 829 00:52:00,320 --> 00:52:02,319 Speaker 2: any college, and there's going to be a sentence in 830 00:52:02,320 --> 00:52:06,080 Speaker 2: there that's saying the point of this university is to create, 831 00:52:06,719 --> 00:52:09,560 Speaker 2: is to educate young people to take their place as 832 00:52:09,680 --> 00:52:13,360 Speaker 2: engaged members of their democracy. So we're the only ranking 833 00:52:13,360 --> 00:52:16,640 Speaker 2: that holds schools to account for their own mission statement 834 00:52:16,680 --> 00:52:20,440 Speaker 2: in that regard. And so a school gets extra points 835 00:52:20,440 --> 00:52:26,000 Speaker 2: in our ranking if they have a robust ROTC program 836 00:52:26,840 --> 00:52:29,439 Speaker 2: serving in the military, if they students go on into 837 00:52:29,480 --> 00:52:33,600 Speaker 2: the Peace Corps, if they are friendly to people financially 838 00:52:33,640 --> 00:52:39,280 Speaker 2: who serve in America Corps, if the voter registration numbers 839 00:52:39,440 --> 00:52:41,520 Speaker 2: are high and they do what they need to do 840 00:52:41,600 --> 00:52:46,600 Speaker 2: to make voting easier for their students. If they use 841 00:52:46,680 --> 00:52:51,280 Speaker 2: some of their work study money to provide community service 842 00:52:51,400 --> 00:52:55,160 Speaker 2: opportunities rather than just you know, free labor for the college, 843 00:52:55,320 --> 00:52:58,399 Speaker 2: that sort of thing. And so when you put those 844 00:52:58,440 --> 00:53:04,960 Speaker 2: three things together, you get an entirely different, you know ranking. 845 00:53:05,040 --> 00:53:07,880 Speaker 2: All the other rankings, it's all the top thirty or 846 00:53:07,920 --> 00:53:10,600 Speaker 2: all the colleges that are always there, right they're almost 847 00:53:10,640 --> 00:53:11,120 Speaker 2: never changed. 848 00:53:11,120 --> 00:53:14,960 Speaker 1: Harvard, Stanford, maybe a couple of states. They freak out 849 00:53:14,960 --> 00:53:18,880 Speaker 1: if they lose a notch er too. I mean, you know, 850 00:53:18,960 --> 00:53:21,640 Speaker 1: you hear about it. I mean you know, I think 851 00:53:21,680 --> 00:53:24,040 Speaker 1: Georgetown got all freaked out that they went from twenty 852 00:53:24,040 --> 00:53:26,840 Speaker 1: five to twenty seven. Yeah, like, oh my god, you know, 853 00:53:26,880 --> 00:53:27,720 Speaker 1: this guy's falling. 854 00:53:27,880 --> 00:53:32,760 Speaker 2: No, this is huge for these colleges. And and again. 855 00:53:33,000 --> 00:53:34,839 Speaker 2: So you go to the top twenty or thirty, and 856 00:53:34,880 --> 00:53:37,640 Speaker 2: they're all schools most people can't get into, right, they're 857 00:53:37,680 --> 00:53:44,040 Speaker 2: all country clubs and look, elite schools. They do a 858 00:53:44,040 --> 00:53:47,359 Speaker 2: good job. I wound up, you know, transferring to one 859 00:53:47,400 --> 00:53:51,040 Speaker 2: and got an elite degree after going to state school. 860 00:53:52,239 --> 00:53:54,560 Speaker 2: More power to it. If you can get in, you'll 861 00:53:54,600 --> 00:53:56,360 Speaker 2: make a lot of money, you'll have a great network. 862 00:53:56,640 --> 00:54:00,720 Speaker 2: But most people can't, right, that's the point. So yeah, 863 00:54:00,760 --> 00:54:04,960 Speaker 2: So the top schools in US News this year barely 864 00:54:05,000 --> 00:54:10,239 Speaker 2: budged the top thirty schools in Washington monthly. Half of 865 00:54:10,320 --> 00:54:14,239 Speaker 2: them were these elite schools. Well, and you know. 866 00:54:14,320 --> 00:54:18,200 Speaker 1: Duke and yeah, your Rice is your Vanderbilts there on there. 867 00:54:18,239 --> 00:54:19,799 Speaker 1: I was looking at the South, but then you got 868 00:54:20,080 --> 00:54:22,640 Speaker 1: a school like that's number. I was just looking right. 869 00:54:22,680 --> 00:54:25,239 Speaker 1: The number one school in the South for best bang 870 00:54:25,280 --> 00:54:27,280 Speaker 1: for your buck and the number one liberal arts college 871 00:54:27,680 --> 00:54:28,200 Speaker 1: is Barea. 872 00:54:28,680 --> 00:54:32,680 Speaker 2: Yeah, it's the number one school among fourteen hundred colleges 873 00:54:32,719 --> 00:54:33,800 Speaker 2: that we rank that. 874 00:54:34,280 --> 00:54:36,239 Speaker 1: I mean, nobody would have had that. Where's Brea in 875 00:54:36,280 --> 00:54:37,640 Speaker 1: the US News rank? Oh? 876 00:54:37,920 --> 00:54:40,360 Speaker 2: I mean, you know, if you off to the side 877 00:54:40,360 --> 00:54:42,279 Speaker 2: and some side ranking, they probably give it, you know, 878 00:54:42,600 --> 00:54:44,800 Speaker 2: some lip service. But we're the only ranking in the 879 00:54:44,840 --> 00:54:50,200 Speaker 2: country that says Berea University in Barrack in breat Kentucky. Berea, 880 00:54:50,280 --> 00:54:50,800 Speaker 2: by the way. 881 00:54:51,080 --> 00:54:54,000 Speaker 1: I mean, excuse me, Yeah, I know we're both is 882 00:54:54,040 --> 00:54:54,640 Speaker 1: the number. 883 00:54:54,400 --> 00:54:58,160 Speaker 2: One school and and why because they do it an 884 00:54:57,840 --> 00:55:03,239 Speaker 2: astonishing job of providing a great education to students of 885 00:55:03,280 --> 00:55:06,920 Speaker 2: modest means. Most of their students nine percent of their students, 886 00:55:06,920 --> 00:55:10,759 Speaker 2: by the way, are on pelgrants. That's the federal Where 887 00:55:10,840 --> 00:55:14,480 Speaker 2: is where is Brion Bria is in Borea and it's 888 00:55:14,560 --> 00:55:17,239 Speaker 2: I don't know, seventy five miles from Lexington, if that 889 00:55:17,800 --> 00:55:18,360 Speaker 2: puts you in the. 890 00:55:18,680 --> 00:55:20,040 Speaker 1: So it's in that side of Kentucky. 891 00:55:20,120 --> 00:55:23,480 Speaker 2: Yeah, Lexington, and almost all their students are from the 892 00:55:23,600 --> 00:55:27,840 Speaker 2: Appalachia College was founded in eighteen fifty five by abolitionists, 893 00:55:29,000 --> 00:55:30,840 Speaker 2: and it was the first college south of the Mason 894 00:55:30,840 --> 00:55:34,120 Speaker 2: Dixon line to educate both blacks and whites and women. 895 00:55:34,880 --> 00:55:37,319 Speaker 2: And for more than one hundred years it's had the 896 00:55:37,360 --> 00:55:40,879 Speaker 2: aspiration to charge no tuition to anybody. And they don't 897 00:55:40,960 --> 00:55:44,000 Speaker 2: quite get there, but the vast majority of the students 898 00:55:44,040 --> 00:55:46,480 Speaker 2: pay little to nothing and they do that. 899 00:55:46,560 --> 00:55:48,080 Speaker 1: How do they? Yeah, how do they do it? 900 00:55:48,080 --> 00:55:50,440 Speaker 2: It's fascinating. I did, We'll do a podcast and I 901 00:55:50,440 --> 00:55:53,200 Speaker 2: interviewed the president, Cynthia Nixon. 902 00:55:53,280 --> 00:55:53,640 Speaker 1: Is her name? 903 00:55:54,640 --> 00:55:55,040 Speaker 2: Number one? 904 00:55:55,080 --> 00:55:57,840 Speaker 1: That's not that Cynthia Nixon, right, Yeah, a difference. 905 00:55:58,080 --> 00:56:01,080 Speaker 2: I think they think that's your name. A very bright woman, 906 00:56:01,719 --> 00:56:04,400 Speaker 2: and she explained it to us. Number one, they're what 907 00:56:04,719 --> 00:56:09,360 Speaker 2: a really designated work college, meaning all of their students 908 00:56:09,360 --> 00:56:12,200 Speaker 2: get work study money. So and then some of that 909 00:56:12,280 --> 00:56:15,920 Speaker 2: money goes to pay their tuition and some of it 910 00:56:15,960 --> 00:56:22,440 Speaker 2: goes in their pocket. Number two And really the biggest 911 00:56:22,480 --> 00:56:26,000 Speaker 2: reason is for a hundred years they've been building a 912 00:56:26,560 --> 00:56:32,840 Speaker 2: a endowment through small donations that's now like a billion 913 00:56:32,880 --> 00:56:33,800 Speaker 2: and a half dollars. 914 00:56:34,080 --> 00:56:35,920 Speaker 1: Wow. They're just are really smart investors. 915 00:56:36,920 --> 00:56:39,000 Speaker 2: Smart investors. And if you start a hundred years ago 916 00:56:39,320 --> 00:56:43,600 Speaker 2: and you keep going, magic a compound interest and instead 917 00:56:43,600 --> 00:56:46,400 Speaker 2: of like using it to build sports stadiums or endow 918 00:56:46,760 --> 00:56:47,160 Speaker 2: you know. 919 00:56:47,280 --> 00:56:50,239 Speaker 1: Or beautiful dorms. Right, that becomes the arms race at 920 00:56:50,239 --> 00:56:53,880 Speaker 1: these universities for dorms that look like they look like 921 00:56:53,960 --> 00:56:56,360 Speaker 1: midtown Manhattan apartments exactly. 922 00:56:56,640 --> 00:56:58,799 Speaker 2: It all goes or not, you know, the bulk of 923 00:56:58,840 --> 00:57:02,920 Speaker 2: it goes to keeping costs down for students, and then 924 00:57:02,920 --> 00:57:06,120 Speaker 2: the students it's it's it's it's a selective ish university. 925 00:57:06,200 --> 00:57:09,600 Speaker 2: Not everybody gets in. It's not like Yale, but they 926 00:57:09,800 --> 00:57:16,080 Speaker 2: they it's a academically rigorous institution. When you go look 927 00:57:16,160 --> 00:57:18,840 Speaker 2: on the student reports, it's like, wow, I'm working my 928 00:57:19,000 --> 00:57:25,520 Speaker 2: tail off here. But when students leave, they earn five 929 00:57:25,680 --> 00:57:30,600 Speaker 2: thousand dollars more per year than their peers and their 930 00:57:30,600 --> 00:57:33,960 Speaker 2: demographic peers who will go to Coline. So you know, 931 00:57:34,200 --> 00:57:36,480 Speaker 2: that's just our idea of a great school. And if 932 00:57:36,520 --> 00:57:40,000 Speaker 2: you look at like just the top five, the most 933 00:57:40,720 --> 00:57:46,680 Speaker 2: the highest ranking elite school is Princeton at number five. 934 00:57:46,800 --> 00:57:49,560 Speaker 2: I think Harvard's down at twenty six or something. But 935 00:57:49,680 --> 00:57:55,440 Speaker 2: above Princeton are three campuses of the California State University system. 936 00:57:56,040 --> 00:57:59,880 Speaker 2: The number two Fresno State, which I'm going to guess 937 00:58:00,040 --> 00:58:04,040 Speaker 2: most of your listeners and viewers don't know much about 938 00:58:04,040 --> 00:58:05,320 Speaker 2: it or maybe have never heard of. 939 00:58:05,680 --> 00:58:08,040 Speaker 1: But it shows up on a Saturday night in college football. 940 00:58:08,200 --> 00:58:09,880 Speaker 1: It does bully, you do see that. 941 00:58:10,480 --> 00:58:15,680 Speaker 2: But they are a fabulous institution. They charge very little. 942 00:58:16,120 --> 00:58:19,680 Speaker 2: The students come from that central valley of California, many 943 00:58:19,720 --> 00:58:22,920 Speaker 2: of them from very poor backgrounds. The president of the 944 00:58:23,040 --> 00:58:26,480 Speaker 2: university grew up working on a farm in the area. 945 00:58:26,800 --> 00:58:31,000 Speaker 2: The students when they graduate tend to stay in the area. 946 00:58:31,000 --> 00:58:32,720 Speaker 2: They don't jet off to New York and work for 947 00:58:32,760 --> 00:58:36,800 Speaker 2: a hedge fund. And some of them go back to 948 00:58:36,920 --> 00:58:43,320 Speaker 2: work for agricultural companies where as children they pick crops. Right. 949 00:58:44,120 --> 00:58:48,240 Speaker 2: That is upward mobility, my friend. Right. And so you know, 950 00:58:48,280 --> 00:58:50,840 Speaker 2: these are the colleges that are really the ones we 951 00:58:50,880 --> 00:58:56,000 Speaker 2: should all elevate and try to support, and unfortunately they are. 952 00:58:56,280 --> 00:59:00,400 Speaker 2: They are underinvested in They don't get anywhere near the 953 00:59:00,840 --> 00:59:06,320 Speaker 2: money that that schools that you know, cater to the 954 00:59:06,480 --> 00:59:09,640 Speaker 2: wealthier student and it's it's kind of a crime. 955 00:59:10,280 --> 00:59:14,160 Speaker 1: You know. It's interesting if there's a pattern, loose pattern 956 00:59:14,200 --> 00:59:16,760 Speaker 1: that I've noticed a lot of colleges, meaning these are 957 00:59:16,880 --> 00:59:20,840 Speaker 1: schools that don't have graduate programs right. In many cases 958 00:59:21,160 --> 00:59:25,640 Speaker 1: they are just focused on the four year I assume 959 00:59:25,640 --> 00:59:27,840 Speaker 1: that's not a coincidence. And how your rankings work that 960 00:59:27,840 --> 00:59:31,280 Speaker 1: that those that these these colleges that are just focused 961 00:59:31,280 --> 00:59:34,800 Speaker 1: on there are not worried about because many many universities, 962 00:59:34,800 --> 00:59:37,880 Speaker 1: it is the graduate programs that pay the bills, right. 963 00:59:38,040 --> 00:59:40,320 Speaker 1: You know, in some ways undergrad is a loss leader, 964 00:59:42,360 --> 00:59:45,440 Speaker 1: and so is there. Do you get a sense that 965 00:59:45,480 --> 00:59:50,680 Speaker 1: those without the graduate schools, without the the the post 966 00:59:50,720 --> 00:59:55,120 Speaker 1: grad you know, whether it's med schools, law schools, et cetera, 967 00:59:56,000 --> 00:59:59,600 Speaker 1: that it it sort of concentrates the administration on running 968 00:59:59,600 --> 01:00:02,440 Speaker 1: a better for your undergrad system. 969 01:00:02,760 --> 01:00:06,600 Speaker 2: I think there's a lot to that. You know, there 970 01:00:06,640 --> 01:00:11,080 Speaker 2: are tiers of universities that are classified by an institution 971 01:00:11,200 --> 01:00:17,080 Speaker 2: called the Carnegie Classification for Institutions of Higher Education, and 972 01:00:17,720 --> 01:00:21,080 Speaker 2: we used to follow them kind of rigorously. Because US 973 01:00:21,160 --> 01:00:25,160 Speaker 2: News did funny you should mention this year, they really 974 01:00:25,160 --> 01:00:28,680 Speaker 2: switched up their rankings and that allowed us to kind 975 01:00:28,720 --> 01:00:31,000 Speaker 2: of free ourselves from how we used to do it. 976 01:00:31,800 --> 01:00:35,720 Speaker 2: And one of the things we did, afropope what you said, 977 01:00:35,800 --> 01:00:40,240 Speaker 2: is we pulled all the research data out of our 978 01:00:40,320 --> 01:00:44,680 Speaker 2: main rankings and just made a best colleges for research, 979 01:00:46,240 --> 01:00:49,480 Speaker 2: because that's where the grad programs are really really are. 980 01:00:50,800 --> 01:00:54,959 Speaker 2: And those are the universities, and there's maybe a couple 981 01:00:55,040 --> 01:00:59,720 Speaker 2: hundred of them that have very big, robust med schools, 982 01:00:59,800 --> 01:01:03,440 Speaker 2: law schools, engineering schools, and so forth. 983 01:01:03,960 --> 01:01:05,800 Speaker 1: Well you look at your list, and it is the 984 01:01:05,800 --> 01:01:08,720 Speaker 1: big These are the school the big schools. It's Michigan, 985 01:01:08,840 --> 01:01:12,480 Speaker 1: it's Stanford, it's Berkeley, it's Purdue, Texas A, and M 986 01:01:12,560 --> 01:01:16,040 Speaker 1: one through five, all of them huge research institutions. 987 01:01:16,120 --> 01:01:19,760 Speaker 2: Right, So we said, let's just put those guys in 988 01:01:19,840 --> 01:01:20,840 Speaker 2: their own category. 989 01:01:20,920 --> 01:01:23,040 Speaker 1: By the way, Texas A and m over. Mit, you 990 01:01:23,080 --> 01:01:25,320 Speaker 1: know how much some Texans would love seeing that at 991 01:01:26,600 --> 01:01:26,880 Speaker 1: they do. 992 01:01:27,160 --> 01:01:32,160 Speaker 2: They brag on it and and you know, not to 993 01:01:32,160 --> 01:01:36,120 Speaker 2: get too political here, but these are the schools that 994 01:01:36,160 --> 01:01:40,760 Speaker 2: the Trump administration is really going after cuts to research grants. 995 01:01:41,440 --> 01:01:44,120 Speaker 2: One of the things we found in doing this exercise, 996 01:01:44,160 --> 01:01:51,080 Speaker 2: and it's in the story, is that sure he's gone 997 01:01:51,120 --> 01:01:57,160 Speaker 2: after the big research universities in blue cities and states, 998 01:01:57,400 --> 01:01:59,800 Speaker 2: but the ones that are also being hit. There are 999 01:01:59,800 --> 01:02:02,920 Speaker 2: a lot of big research universities in red states and 1000 01:02:03,000 --> 01:02:07,880 Speaker 2: in rural areas, and they're getting hurt and and it's 1001 01:02:08,000 --> 01:02:11,920 Speaker 2: like a lot of Trump administration policy. It is aimed 1002 01:02:12,080 --> 01:02:17,120 Speaker 2: at his enemies, but it winds up damaging his boat. 1003 01:02:17,240 --> 01:02:18,800 Speaker 2: There's a whole Paul, I can tell you this. 1004 01:02:18,880 --> 01:02:21,080 Speaker 1: There's a whole bunch of lobbyists making money right now 1005 01:02:21,520 --> 01:02:23,920 Speaker 1: off of universities who've hired them to say, hey, get 1006 01:02:23,960 --> 01:02:26,439 Speaker 1: us off this target list. We're not what I don't 1007 01:02:26,480 --> 01:02:29,520 Speaker 1: think he mean. And and what you find out. I 1008 01:02:29,560 --> 01:02:33,120 Speaker 1: happen to know of one very public university that that's 1009 01:02:33,520 --> 01:02:37,000 Speaker 1: having some success doing that because they got as you 1010 01:02:37,120 --> 01:02:39,880 Speaker 1: just said, they lost some stuff that was aimed at 1011 01:02:39,920 --> 01:02:44,880 Speaker 1: punishing a Northeastern school and it ended up punishing this southern, 1012 01:02:45,040 --> 01:02:49,080 Speaker 1: big state school. And that is it wasn't the intent. 1013 01:02:49,480 --> 01:02:52,400 Speaker 1: And so like just like the farmers, he's trying, they're 1014 01:02:52,440 --> 01:02:54,400 Speaker 1: trying to create carve outs now you know, which of 1015 01:02:54,400 --> 01:02:56,720 Speaker 1: course just got gum up. The whole works. 1016 01:02:56,880 --> 01:02:59,400 Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, no, And it's and it's a it's a 1017 01:03:00,000 --> 01:03:04,440 Speaker 2: plotics truck that we've never seen in this country, never. 1018 01:03:04,560 --> 01:03:09,680 Speaker 1: As the weaponizing college research. Right like, that's another level. 1019 01:03:11,000 --> 01:03:16,360 Speaker 2: Specific targeting of your political enemies on funding that was 1020 01:03:16,400 --> 01:03:21,240 Speaker 2: never intended to be anything but given out on merit, 1021 01:03:21,360 --> 01:03:22,120 Speaker 2: right given out. 1022 01:03:22,120 --> 01:03:25,280 Speaker 1: And it's and not even really political stuff. I mean, 1023 01:03:25,320 --> 01:03:29,320 Speaker 1: you know, whether it's health funding, whether it's research, I mean, 1024 01:03:29,600 --> 01:03:32,400 Speaker 1: this is stuff that is arguably for the masses. 1025 01:03:32,720 --> 01:03:39,080 Speaker 2: Yeah yeah, so so so I hope that people take 1026 01:03:39,120 --> 01:03:43,480 Speaker 2: away from our rankings. I mean, I think our rankings 1027 01:03:43,920 --> 01:03:48,680 Speaker 2: resonate at this moment because there's so much fury at 1028 01:03:48,720 --> 01:03:52,680 Speaker 2: higher end, and the fury is in all directions from 1029 01:03:52,680 --> 01:03:56,640 Speaker 2: all quarters, and you know, a lot of it is 1030 01:03:56,680 --> 01:04:00,720 Speaker 2: political and partisan, and I think, you know, maybe have 1031 01:04:00,960 --> 01:04:04,560 Speaker 2: has grains of truth in it, but is also you know, 1032 01:04:04,880 --> 01:04:09,280 Speaker 2: kind of hypocritical. These people I'm furious about elite universities 1033 01:04:09,280 --> 01:04:12,320 Speaker 2: and college in general, and absolutely desperate to get their 1034 01:04:12,400 --> 01:04:19,040 Speaker 2: kids in there. But part of the fury is is real. 1035 01:04:19,200 --> 01:04:22,040 Speaker 2: Is it costs a lot of money now to send 1036 01:04:22,600 --> 01:04:25,320 Speaker 2: a kid to college or send yourself to college. I 1037 01:04:25,360 --> 01:04:30,840 Speaker 2: mean real inflation adjusted spending for two year schools has 1038 01:04:30,880 --> 01:04:34,760 Speaker 2: nearly doubled since nineteen ninety four, and more than doubled 1039 01:04:35,200 --> 01:04:39,120 Speaker 2: for four year schools. And you know, people are saying, 1040 01:04:39,160 --> 01:04:43,320 Speaker 2: you know, is college still worth it? Well, you go 1041 01:04:43,360 --> 01:04:45,520 Speaker 2: to the Washington Mother you see hundreds of colleges that 1042 01:04:45,560 --> 01:04:49,600 Speaker 2: are really very much worth it. But in general, you know, 1043 01:04:49,640 --> 01:04:53,120 Speaker 2: at Toyota is a great buy at thirty thousand dollars, 1044 01:04:54,080 --> 01:04:56,240 Speaker 2: roll or whatever. At one hundred and fifty thousand dollars, 1045 01:04:56,240 --> 01:04:58,920 Speaker 2: it's not worth it. Right, So, until we can get 1046 01:04:58,920 --> 01:05:03,360 Speaker 2: the cost of college down, prove the quality, because a 1047 01:05:03,360 --> 01:05:06,640 Speaker 2: lot of colleges are just not delivering quality. You're going 1048 01:05:06,720 --> 01:05:10,160 Speaker 2: to have this this fury, this this distrust. 1049 01:05:20,680 --> 01:05:22,840 Speaker 1: What's the best way to find out? I mean, I'll 1050 01:05:22,880 --> 01:05:26,600 Speaker 1: tell you all these rankings where I feel And it's 1051 01:05:26,640 --> 01:05:29,400 Speaker 1: one of those things I didn't really appreciate until after 1052 01:05:29,440 --> 01:05:33,080 Speaker 1: I got on a campus. But what kind of professors, 1053 01:05:33,080 --> 01:05:35,040 Speaker 1: what kind of teachers do they have? What how do 1054 01:05:35,080 --> 01:05:38,600 Speaker 1: they hire their professors? Do they demand professors that do 1055 01:05:38,680 --> 01:05:44,200 Speaker 1: research and prioritize their own work, or do they hire 1056 01:05:44,280 --> 01:05:47,240 Speaker 1: teachers real coaches? And when I mean a teacher, I 1057 01:05:47,280 --> 01:05:50,480 Speaker 1: mean like a coach. You know who who becomes that 1058 01:05:50,680 --> 01:05:55,120 Speaker 1: mentor you know? I mean, look, I teach part time. 1059 01:05:56,440 --> 01:06:01,280 Speaker 1: I'm I'm on use USC's campus right now. And I 1060 01:06:01,320 --> 01:06:03,080 Speaker 1: did an event last night and three of my former 1061 01:06:03,120 --> 01:06:05,880 Speaker 1: students showed up and it it brought a ton of 1062 01:06:05,920 --> 01:06:08,760 Speaker 1: joy to me. Right. It is that there is a 1063 01:06:08,920 --> 01:06:10,720 Speaker 1: joy you get out of it when you feel like 1064 01:06:11,200 --> 01:06:13,280 Speaker 1: you've you've been able to pass something on, you've been 1065 01:06:13,320 --> 01:06:17,160 Speaker 1: able to inspire a student, and not all people are 1066 01:06:17,160 --> 01:06:21,480 Speaker 1: motivated by that or have that. Is there a way 1067 01:06:21,520 --> 01:06:24,680 Speaker 1: to measure what kind of because you could you look 1068 01:06:24,720 --> 01:06:26,760 Speaker 1: at a resume of somebody, well, what a great resume, 1069 01:06:26,800 --> 01:06:27,880 Speaker 1: But you have no idea if there are any good 1070 01:06:27,880 --> 01:06:29,720 Speaker 1: at being a teacher and they know how to be 1071 01:06:29,760 --> 01:06:33,120 Speaker 1: a coach, you know that sort of mindset. You know, 1072 01:06:33,360 --> 01:06:35,520 Speaker 1: is that researchable? Is that rankable? 1073 01:06:36,360 --> 01:06:40,560 Speaker 2: So we've really struggled with this, and there are there 1074 01:06:40,640 --> 01:06:44,280 Speaker 2: is some data that you can use to measure the 1075 01:06:44,400 --> 01:06:49,880 Speaker 2: quality of student engagement, quality of teaching, but we are 1076 01:06:50,520 --> 01:06:56,040 Speaker 2: sufficiently doubtful of it to not We've written stories about it. 1077 01:06:56,080 --> 01:06:58,320 Speaker 1: We've you know, is this what sort of the student 1078 01:06:58,440 --> 01:07:01,600 Speaker 1: reaction to professors? Is it? Use those rate of professors? 1079 01:07:01,640 --> 01:07:06,840 Speaker 2: There's a professor there's something called the National Survey of 1080 01:07:07,080 --> 01:07:13,800 Speaker 2: Student Engagement. You know, they ask students and faculty how 1081 01:07:13,800 --> 01:07:16,440 Speaker 2: many times during the course of the week have you 1082 01:07:16,520 --> 01:07:19,240 Speaker 2: met with a professor outside the classroom? Right? How many 1083 01:07:20,040 --> 01:07:22,440 Speaker 2: ten page or more papers did you have to write? 1084 01:07:22,720 --> 01:07:29,640 Speaker 2: They try to measure the degree to which actual evidence 1085 01:07:29,800 --> 01:07:35,040 Speaker 2: based practices that we know lead to learning are happening 1086 01:07:35,040 --> 01:07:39,160 Speaker 2: on the ground. Not bad, but it's not of a 1087 01:07:39,240 --> 01:07:42,120 Speaker 2: quality that we've been felt comfortable to put in our rankings. 1088 01:07:42,120 --> 01:07:46,200 Speaker 2: But you're asking the right question anecdotally. Like I went 1089 01:07:46,240 --> 01:07:48,439 Speaker 2: to the University of Missouri my freshman year. It's good, 1090 01:07:48,520 --> 01:07:55,200 Speaker 2: good school, the flag that I transferred to Northwestern. Honestly, 1091 01:07:55,360 --> 01:07:57,600 Speaker 2: the quality of the teaching at Northwestern wasn't any better 1092 01:07:57,640 --> 01:08:00,320 Speaker 2: than the quality teaching that I had at MISSOI. 1093 01:08:00,400 --> 01:08:02,880 Speaker 1: I Betfess has just had to pay higher rent. Yeah, 1094 01:08:04,000 --> 01:08:05,000 Speaker 1: they did in Columbia. 1095 01:08:05,200 --> 01:08:08,440 Speaker 2: I've given lectures to, you know, many at many colleges. 1096 01:08:08,680 --> 01:08:11,040 Speaker 2: I've been doing this college ranking thing for twenty years. 1097 01:08:11,760 --> 01:08:17,360 Speaker 2: And you landed some small bu college, you know, not 1098 01:08:17,560 --> 01:08:22,840 Speaker 2: well known college in the middle of nowhere, and you know, 1099 01:08:23,479 --> 01:08:28,639 Speaker 2: you meet these professors who are just wonderful, and they're 1100 01:08:29,120 --> 01:08:32,200 Speaker 2: very smart, and the students adore them, and they have 1101 01:08:32,280 --> 01:08:38,200 Speaker 2: degrees from very prestigious universities. The thing is, we overproduce 1102 01:08:38,360 --> 01:08:41,280 Speaker 2: academic talent in this country. Right. Most people that get 1103 01:08:41,320 --> 01:08:46,519 Speaker 2: PhDs struggle to find teaching jobs. And that's tough if 1104 01:08:46,560 --> 01:08:49,160 Speaker 2: you're in that profession. But it's great if you're a 1105 01:08:49,400 --> 01:08:52,040 Speaker 2: college in some far flung place. Sure you got your 1106 01:08:52,120 --> 01:08:53,160 Speaker 2: pick a great talent. 1107 01:08:53,560 --> 01:08:57,040 Speaker 1: Yeah, you get a Harvard train, Princeton train, Michigan train 1108 01:08:57,200 --> 01:08:59,639 Speaker 1: at you know, at a small college in the middle 1109 01:08:59,680 --> 01:08:59,960 Speaker 1: of camp. 1110 01:09:00,479 --> 01:09:03,680 Speaker 2: Yeah. And and and the less research they're doing, the 1111 01:09:03,680 --> 01:09:07,080 Speaker 2: more time they're like, all right, I'll just put my 1112 01:09:07,080 --> 01:09:11,439 Speaker 2: my My mission is to is to educate these kids. So, uh, 1113 01:09:11,640 --> 01:09:16,839 Speaker 2: I do think that the quality of teaching between elite 1114 01:09:16,840 --> 01:09:21,000 Speaker 2: schools and non elite schools is very narrow, is very similar. 1115 01:09:22,680 --> 01:09:26,360 Speaker 1: So one of the challenges that's coming. I say this, 1116 01:09:26,520 --> 01:09:29,519 Speaker 1: I serve on a board at GW, so I hear 1117 01:09:29,600 --> 01:09:34,120 Speaker 1: these uh admissions concerns, meaning it's the so called demographic 1118 01:09:34,160 --> 01:09:38,000 Speaker 1: cliff that we are at the beginning of that. I 1119 01:09:38,000 --> 01:09:40,800 Speaker 1: guess it's I guess it's my generation's fault. I didn't 1120 01:09:40,800 --> 01:09:44,160 Speaker 1: have enough kids. I only had two, Right, we didn't 1121 01:09:44,160 --> 01:09:47,240 Speaker 1: have there and you did your job to Yeah, I 1122 01:09:47,360 --> 01:09:48,880 Speaker 1: replaced right, we replaced. 1123 01:09:48,520 --> 01:09:50,800 Speaker 2: The environment i'd had to and we can better close 1124 01:09:50,840 --> 01:09:51,200 Speaker 2: them back. 1125 01:09:52,000 --> 01:09:56,439 Speaker 1: So but there's I look at a lot of your 1126 01:09:56,880 --> 01:10:00,559 Speaker 1: the colleges that made the rankings, and I many of 1127 01:10:00,560 --> 01:10:03,800 Speaker 1: them are financially strapped, and I think there is going 1128 01:10:03,920 --> 01:10:07,080 Speaker 1: to be a you know, in the next ten or 1129 01:10:07,120 --> 01:10:09,200 Speaker 1: fifteen years, we're going to see colleges. I have a 1130 01:10:09,240 --> 01:10:12,160 Speaker 1: friend of mine who is the former well somebody you 1131 01:10:12,200 --> 01:10:19,240 Speaker 1: know Hobart who worked in the Clint administration yep, back 1132 01:10:19,280 --> 01:10:24,360 Speaker 1: in the day. And I remember Mark gearan great guy. 1133 01:10:24,880 --> 01:10:27,920 Speaker 1: And I remember Mark telling me this fifteen years ago 1134 01:10:28,160 --> 01:10:30,240 Speaker 1: when he was at Hobart and then he left and 1135 01:10:30,240 --> 01:10:33,880 Speaker 1: then he came back, that there's real financial challenges for 1136 01:10:33,920 --> 01:10:37,280 Speaker 1: these smaller basically the schools that performed best in your list. 1137 01:10:38,080 --> 01:10:41,240 Speaker 1: You know, Bria has sounds like they have a good endowment. 1138 01:10:41,520 --> 01:10:44,960 Speaker 1: Many of these smaller colleges do not. And if you 1139 01:10:45,040 --> 01:10:47,560 Speaker 1: take away international students and you take away some of 1140 01:10:47,600 --> 01:10:51,479 Speaker 1: these things, there's going to be some good colleges that 1141 01:10:51,560 --> 01:10:54,800 Speaker 1: go bankrupt in the next ten years, that just disappear. 1142 01:10:56,920 --> 01:11:00,000 Speaker 1: What are you sensing, you know, have you been able 1143 01:11:00,120 --> 01:11:02,479 Speaker 1: to pick up on how are some of these smaller 1144 01:11:02,479 --> 01:11:06,719 Speaker 1: colleges trying to survive in this in this tightening financial climate. 1145 01:11:07,360 --> 01:11:09,960 Speaker 2: Well, I'll add one one more piece of news for you. 1146 01:11:10,320 --> 01:11:14,519 Speaker 2: In the big beautiful Act that got passed, uh, there 1147 01:11:14,600 --> 01:11:22,320 Speaker 2: is uh statutory language that is saying colleges that don't 1148 01:11:22,720 --> 01:11:26,040 Speaker 2: demonstrate bang for the buck, that don't demonstrate a good 1149 01:11:26,040 --> 01:11:30,400 Speaker 2: return on investment will eventually get cut off from federal financing. 1150 01:11:30,920 --> 01:11:31,240 Speaker 1: Mmm. 1151 01:11:31,880 --> 01:11:34,160 Speaker 2: So there's going to be in addition to. 1152 01:11:34,080 --> 01:11:35,400 Speaker 1: The interesting reckoning. 1153 01:11:35,840 --> 01:11:38,880 Speaker 2: Yeah, and honestly, the Washington Monthly has been calling for 1154 01:11:38,920 --> 01:11:42,960 Speaker 2: something like this for years. You know, whether this bill 1155 01:11:43,000 --> 01:11:48,040 Speaker 2: got it quite right, we can debate, but the the the. 1156 01:11:47,280 --> 01:11:50,519 Speaker 1: Spirit, you like the spirit of it a hundred. Look, 1157 01:11:50,640 --> 01:11:53,040 Speaker 1: I remember the Obama administration couldn't get anything passed, so 1158 01:11:53,080 --> 01:11:54,760 Speaker 1: they decided they were going to put out their own 1159 01:11:55,120 --> 01:11:59,160 Speaker 1: best bang. It never really took you remember that they 1160 01:11:59,160 --> 01:12:00,760 Speaker 1: were going to make it a king and in the 1161 01:12:00,840 --> 01:12:02,599 Speaker 1: end they said, no, we'll just put out the data 1162 01:12:02,840 --> 01:12:04,639 Speaker 1: that I both know what happened. You know, I both 1163 01:12:04,640 --> 01:12:07,160 Speaker 1: know what happened. There so many of those they all 1164 01:12:07,160 --> 01:12:11,120 Speaker 1: had connections to some higher institution like don't you rank us? 1165 01:12:11,360 --> 01:12:13,879 Speaker 1: Don't you do that? You know exactly? 1166 01:12:13,920 --> 01:12:15,960 Speaker 2: They went about as far as they politically could. But 1167 01:12:17,720 --> 01:12:20,799 Speaker 2: uh so, so if you look at our fourteen hundred 1168 01:12:20,840 --> 01:12:24,400 Speaker 2: plus schools and our best best uh colleges for your 1169 01:12:24,400 --> 01:12:28,880 Speaker 2: tuition and tax dollar ranking, we've talked about the good ones, 1170 01:12:28,920 --> 01:12:34,479 Speaker 2: the great ones, the you know, uh, you know, uh President, 1171 01:12:36,120 --> 01:12:38,719 Speaker 2: there's a lot of colleges down on the blow that 1172 01:12:39,479 --> 01:12:45,120 Speaker 2: really should go, should disappear. Huh, they need some radical reform. 1173 01:12:45,320 --> 01:12:48,320 Speaker 2: They charged too much, Their students don't make that much money, 1174 01:12:48,360 --> 01:12:51,840 Speaker 2: they don't graduate it. There there almost predatory. 1175 01:12:52,640 --> 01:12:55,240 Speaker 1: Now, let's let's name some names. What's what's a what's 1176 01:12:55,280 --> 01:12:56,160 Speaker 1: one that people. 1177 01:12:56,880 --> 01:13:01,720 Speaker 2: But you know, you know, Liberty University, right? Uh, just 1178 01:13:01,800 --> 01:13:08,560 Speaker 2: a terrible college too Lane, Right, people think is a terrific. 1179 01:13:08,240 --> 01:13:11,559 Speaker 1: Yeah, my kids loved that was on the list, at. 1180 01:13:11,560 --> 01:13:14,080 Speaker 2: Least by our reckoning. Right, I'm sure if you're yeah, 1181 01:13:14,520 --> 01:13:18,160 Speaker 2: you know it has its But but so there's a 1182 01:13:18,160 --> 01:13:20,240 Speaker 2: lot of schools you hadn't heard of, a lot of 1183 01:13:20,680 --> 01:13:23,599 Speaker 2: you know, the arts schools and the music schools where 1184 01:13:23,800 --> 01:13:25,920 Speaker 2: you know, students go knowing they're never going to make 1185 01:13:25,920 --> 01:13:26,439 Speaker 2: any money. 1186 01:13:26,680 --> 01:13:31,240 Speaker 1: Berkeley School of Music, Yeah, one of those very expensive 1187 01:13:31,400 --> 01:13:34,479 Speaker 1: and and and selective and no guarantee you're going to 1188 01:13:34,520 --> 01:13:36,840 Speaker 1: make it. All right. Look, I was a I was 1189 01:13:36,880 --> 01:13:41,960 Speaker 1: a musician. Yeah, and I did get a music scholarship. 1190 01:13:41,960 --> 01:13:44,639 Speaker 1: But I remember toying with Berkeley and thought, man, I'm 1191 01:13:44,640 --> 01:13:49,120 Speaker 1: not that that's a you're you're you're, you're going for 1192 01:13:49,200 --> 01:13:52,120 Speaker 1: the dream and literally it's one percent that makes it 1193 01:13:52,280 --> 01:13:53,600 Speaker 1: exactly exactly. 1194 01:13:55,120 --> 01:14:01,919 Speaker 2: But so there are a lot of towns kept alive 1195 01:14:02,120 --> 01:14:06,799 Speaker 2: in part by their university. And those are the places 1196 01:14:06,800 --> 01:14:09,719 Speaker 2: my heart goes out to because one of the great 1197 01:14:09,720 --> 01:14:14,400 Speaker 2: things about the American system of higher education is it's dispersed. 1198 01:14:14,479 --> 01:14:18,880 Speaker 2: It's all over the country. And you know, you think of. 1199 01:14:19,360 --> 01:14:24,599 Speaker 1: The every European marvels at this. Yeah, you just marvel 1200 01:14:24,680 --> 01:14:27,720 Speaker 1: at it that we have these institutions everywhere. 1201 01:14:28,680 --> 01:14:31,519 Speaker 2: And I think we need a new deal. And we've 1202 01:14:31,560 --> 01:14:36,840 Speaker 2: written about this. Kevin Carry, one of our guest editors, 1203 01:14:36,840 --> 01:14:39,680 Speaker 2: have written extensively about it. We need a deal, a 1204 01:14:39,680 --> 01:14:42,240 Speaker 2: new deal for higher ed. We need to reach out 1205 01:14:42,240 --> 01:14:46,360 Speaker 2: to colleges and say, on a voluntary basis, if you're 1206 01:14:46,439 --> 01:14:50,720 Speaker 2: willing to control costs, to share your data so that 1207 01:14:50,800 --> 01:14:54,960 Speaker 2: we can monitor what's going on and improve quality and 1208 01:14:55,400 --> 01:14:59,360 Speaker 2: charge little to nothing to students of bodest means, we're 1209 01:14:59,360 --> 01:15:01,920 Speaker 2: going to cover you do all your costs up to 1210 01:15:01,960 --> 01:15:07,720 Speaker 2: a certain modest amount. This is an oversimplification, chock, but 1211 01:15:08,520 --> 01:15:14,040 Speaker 2: the average cost spending on a student, not accounting room 1212 01:15:14,080 --> 01:15:16,680 Speaker 2: and board, it's about ten thousand dollars a year to. 1213 01:15:16,640 --> 01:15:17,160 Speaker 1: Go to college. 1214 01:15:17,439 --> 01:15:22,879 Speaker 2: To cost to college, if you offered colleges ten thousand 1215 01:15:22,880 --> 01:15:26,960 Speaker 2: dollars per student. That's the deal. And oh, by the way, 1216 01:15:27,320 --> 01:15:31,320 Speaker 2: any credit at any college from a class transfers over 1217 01:15:31,400 --> 01:15:33,799 Speaker 2: if that student goes to another college in the network. 1218 01:15:34,840 --> 01:15:37,719 Speaker 2: That could save thousands of hundreds of these schools anyway, 1219 01:15:38,240 --> 01:15:41,160 Speaker 2: and I think a lot of state schools would join in. 1220 01:15:41,640 --> 01:15:45,760 Speaker 2: The elites would never do this, but that way you 1221 01:15:45,800 --> 01:15:50,200 Speaker 2: could deliver free college or virtually free college to the 1222 01:15:50,240 --> 01:15:54,960 Speaker 2: working middle class American. Save these schools, save these towns, 1223 01:15:55,400 --> 01:16:00,240 Speaker 2: save these regions, have better quality at lower cost, and 1224 01:16:00,320 --> 01:16:02,040 Speaker 2: I could be transformative for the country. 1225 01:16:02,320 --> 01:16:05,920 Speaker 1: Well look, I mean, and I can already hear you 1226 01:16:06,280 --> 01:16:08,720 Speaker 1: essentially making this pitch so that left and right both 1227 01:16:08,720 --> 01:16:12,960 Speaker 1: could embrace it. Which is that's as much as to 1228 01:16:13,080 --> 01:16:15,880 Speaker 1: save these rural towns that do love that. You know. 1229 01:16:15,920 --> 01:16:17,640 Speaker 1: It's funny, you know there's this sort of war on 1230 01:16:17,720 --> 01:16:21,160 Speaker 1: higher ed on the right, but locally they love you know. 1231 01:16:21,200 --> 01:16:23,519 Speaker 1: It's like, Frankly, it's like you're a member of Congress. 1232 01:16:23,560 --> 01:16:25,320 Speaker 1: I can't stay in Congress, but I like my guy, 1233 01:16:25,720 --> 01:16:27,679 Speaker 1: you know, right, I don't like these higher ed guys. 1234 01:16:27,720 --> 01:16:29,519 Speaker 1: But you know, we've got a nice little university right 1235 01:16:29,520 --> 01:16:31,680 Speaker 1: down the street here it's a good you know, you know, 1236 01:16:31,680 --> 01:16:34,240 Speaker 1: they produce really good people. I get my babysitters from there, 1237 01:16:34,280 --> 01:16:35,559 Speaker 1: you know, type of mindset. 1238 01:16:36,040 --> 01:16:38,080 Speaker 2: Yeah, yeah, And they have they have the local radio station, 1239 01:16:38,160 --> 01:16:41,240 Speaker 2: and they have right a lot of times they provide 1240 01:16:41,280 --> 01:16:44,720 Speaker 2: the local news exactly exactly. And you know, there are 1241 01:16:44,840 --> 01:16:48,280 Speaker 2: a lot of these regional public universities the Fresno states, 1242 01:16:48,560 --> 01:16:53,720 Speaker 2: the Northeast Missouri state or Southeast Missouri state, these colleges 1243 01:16:53,840 --> 01:16:59,320 Speaker 2: that are known regionally but have no national profile. That's 1244 01:16:59,360 --> 01:17:03,200 Speaker 2: where most people get their BA degrees. Right, and they're 1245 01:17:03,280 --> 01:17:08,000 Speaker 2: underinvested in I think they get about one thousand dollars 1246 01:17:08,040 --> 01:17:12,080 Speaker 2: per student, less than the flagship universities in those states, 1247 01:17:12,680 --> 01:17:15,559 Speaker 2: and maybe half or a third of what gets spent 1248 01:17:15,680 --> 01:17:18,880 Speaker 2: for these elite schools. And they're doing the yeomens work. 1249 01:17:19,479 --> 01:17:23,200 Speaker 2: They are up the engines of upward mobility in this country. 1250 01:17:24,840 --> 01:17:27,120 Speaker 1: If we had had a conversation in the early nineties 1251 01:17:29,920 --> 01:17:33,280 Speaker 1: the question, I would have assumed back then that we 1252 01:17:33,280 --> 01:17:36,800 Speaker 1: were going to get what I call mandatory thirteenth and 1253 01:17:36,880 --> 01:17:41,799 Speaker 1: fourteenth grade, meaning that the first two years if essentially 1254 01:17:41,840 --> 01:17:44,640 Speaker 1: community college was going to be free, that it was 1255 01:17:44,680 --> 01:17:47,040 Speaker 1: going to be available the way public the essentially, we 1256 01:17:47,040 --> 01:17:49,880 Speaker 1: were going to extend public education two more years. It 1257 01:17:50,000 --> 01:17:54,000 Speaker 1: seemed inevitable. It's where I remember, you know, one of 1258 01:17:54,040 --> 01:17:58,360 Speaker 1: the smarter strategic things that Bill Clinton did in ninety two, 1259 01:17:58,520 --> 01:18:02,559 Speaker 1: I remember was prioritize in campaign events at community colleges. Yeah, 1260 01:18:02,960 --> 01:18:05,679 Speaker 1: and you know, it was just you know, that could 1261 01:18:05,680 --> 01:18:07,240 Speaker 1: why do you do that? That's where the people are, 1262 01:18:07,439 --> 01:18:09,519 Speaker 1: right like, it was a you know, and he was 1263 01:18:09,720 --> 01:18:13,400 Speaker 1: he was making an economic argument, and what better place 1264 01:18:13,479 --> 01:18:15,760 Speaker 1: to do that where people are looking to make it 1265 01:18:15,760 --> 01:18:17,120 Speaker 1: to the middle class than there. 1266 01:18:19,200 --> 01:18:22,200 Speaker 2: And he took the he began the process of getting 1267 01:18:22,479 --> 01:18:25,000 Speaker 2: the banks out of student financing because they were making 1268 01:18:24,960 --> 01:18:28,280 Speaker 2: a boatload with no risk and making it some college 1269 01:18:28,360 --> 01:18:32,280 Speaker 2: could offer directly. No, he was absolutely right. And I 1270 01:18:32,320 --> 01:18:33,200 Speaker 2: don't know if you were. 1271 01:18:33,080 --> 01:18:34,880 Speaker 1: But we're not there. I don't know. I was. I 1272 01:18:35,000 --> 01:18:37,600 Speaker 1: was shocked. I am shocked that we didn't get the 1273 01:18:38,080 --> 01:18:40,640 Speaker 1: And I know it was in the I think it 1274 01:18:40,720 --> 01:18:44,000 Speaker 1: was in the initial draft of one of the bills 1275 01:18:44,320 --> 01:18:46,680 Speaker 1: Bill Better Yeah, black Bear. 1276 01:18:47,400 --> 01:18:52,280 Speaker 2: It was one of those different versions. It was doing 1277 01:18:52,320 --> 01:18:55,479 Speaker 2: for community colleges what I just said we should do 1278 01:18:55,880 --> 01:18:59,960 Speaker 2: for colleges. It was it was basically a set of 1279 01:19:00,080 --> 01:19:06,760 Speaker 2: funding and regulatory uh offers that said we're going to 1280 01:19:06,840 --> 01:19:12,599 Speaker 2: make community college free in America, and it came very close. 1281 01:19:13,520 --> 01:19:16,639 Speaker 2: No Republicans voted for it. I think Joe Manchin voted 1282 01:19:16,640 --> 01:19:20,400 Speaker 2: against it. But what really killed it was the four 1283 01:19:20,479 --> 01:19:24,559 Speaker 2: year elite schools didn't want all that money because it's 1284 01:19:24,600 --> 01:19:27,880 Speaker 2: a fixed pie. They thought they wanted the money for themselves, 1285 01:19:28,080 --> 01:19:32,000 Speaker 2: and so they quietly but non publicly bad mouthed it, 1286 01:19:32,320 --> 01:19:34,080 Speaker 2: and it didn't make it became mac close. 1287 01:19:34,560 --> 01:19:36,919 Speaker 1: Where what is the state the state of the community 1288 01:19:36,920 --> 01:19:39,320 Speaker 1: college system? You know, I grew up in Miami, and 1289 01:19:39,400 --> 01:19:41,880 Speaker 1: I grew up at the time Miami Day Community College 1290 01:19:42,240 --> 01:19:47,240 Speaker 1: was almost a model community college. It except it's now 1291 01:19:47,280 --> 01:19:49,760 Speaker 1: a college. It's a four year college, you know, but 1292 01:19:49,840 --> 01:19:53,400 Speaker 1: it is a tremendous I mean, it is your path, 1293 01:19:54,040 --> 01:19:57,120 Speaker 1: you know, out of out of struggles, and it really is. 1294 01:19:57,200 --> 01:20:01,760 Speaker 1: It's a I'm you know, I think it's it's I'm 1295 01:20:01,800 --> 01:20:03,880 Speaker 1: glad to hear it. Still it hangs in there because 1296 01:20:03,960 --> 01:20:08,679 Speaker 1: I have always been really proud of how successful it's been. 1297 01:20:09,160 --> 01:20:12,120 Speaker 1: What is the state of the community college system in general, 1298 01:20:12,160 --> 01:20:14,120 Speaker 1: because it still is the best path out of the 1299 01:20:14,680 --> 01:20:15,479 Speaker 1: out of poverty. 1300 01:20:16,479 --> 01:20:18,040 Speaker 2: I'm going to answer that question. But before I do 1301 01:20:18,240 --> 01:20:20,439 Speaker 2: one to say, I hope you'll go back to the 1302 01:20:20,479 --> 01:20:24,880 Speaker 2: Washington Monthly and read the story about I think we 1303 01:20:24,960 --> 01:20:32,120 Speaker 2: call it Florida's Fresh Squeezed Universities. It's about Florida, all 1304 01:20:32,160 --> 01:20:35,880 Speaker 2: about the history of how Florida managed. You know, when 1305 01:20:35,880 --> 01:20:39,400 Speaker 2: you think of Florida, you don't think higher education, right, No, And. 1306 01:20:39,520 --> 01:20:42,439 Speaker 1: I've always been personally frustrated that Florida doesn't have a 1307 01:20:42,560 --> 01:20:46,120 Speaker 1: UT system, a Sunni system or the UC system. And 1308 01:20:46,200 --> 01:20:48,759 Speaker 1: it's been They've they toyed with it a few times, 1309 01:20:48,800 --> 01:20:52,519 Speaker 1: but they never they never quite you know, built those 1310 01:20:52,600 --> 01:20:55,360 Speaker 1: type of systems like Texas and California and New Art. 1311 01:20:55,520 --> 01:20:58,559 Speaker 2: I invite you to read the story because what Florida 1312 01:20:58,600 --> 01:21:03,640 Speaker 2: doesn't have is Harvard level prestige schools. You know, for 1313 01:21:03,640 --> 01:21:06,200 Speaker 2: Florida's good school but nobody thinks of it as elite. 1314 01:21:06,800 --> 01:21:11,479 Speaker 2: But the system that they do have is more like 1315 01:21:12,320 --> 01:21:15,880 Speaker 2: UT or the California system or the New York system 1316 01:21:16,240 --> 01:21:20,679 Speaker 2: than you realize. And I'll give you one example. First 1317 01:21:20,680 --> 01:21:23,120 Speaker 2: of all. The end result is you can go to 1318 01:21:23,120 --> 01:21:26,519 Speaker 2: Florida and go to a four year school and the 1319 01:21:26,560 --> 01:21:29,439 Speaker 2: Florida schools do extremely well on our rankings. 1320 01:21:29,680 --> 01:21:30,960 Speaker 1: By the way, they did really well in the US 1321 01:21:31,040 --> 01:21:34,120 Speaker 1: News wreankings this year too. Yeah, because they are a 1322 01:21:34,160 --> 01:21:37,400 Speaker 1: good price. They are very good price. And that is 1323 01:21:37,520 --> 01:21:41,000 Speaker 1: engineered into the Florida system. They give you one example 1324 01:21:41,040 --> 01:21:47,360 Speaker 1: in nineteen the nineteen sixties, they passed a system whereby 1325 01:21:48,320 --> 01:21:55,400 Speaker 1: the every course at every public university in Florida was had. 1326 01:21:55,280 --> 01:21:59,200 Speaker 2: The same course number. And if you pass that course, 1327 01:21:59,760 --> 01:22:02,200 Speaker 2: you pass that course at any other school in Florida. 1328 01:22:03,479 --> 01:22:06,559 Speaker 2: Right as you may know, when you go to community college, 1329 01:22:06,640 --> 01:22:09,679 Speaker 2: you take English one oh one and then you transfer 1330 01:22:09,920 --> 01:22:12,240 Speaker 2: to a four year school. The four year schools like 1331 01:22:12,280 --> 01:22:14,000 Speaker 2: it to say, we don't. 1332 01:22:13,800 --> 01:22:15,759 Speaker 1: Think that the colge. No, but you're right in Florida. 1333 01:22:15,880 --> 01:22:20,240 Speaker 1: Santa Fe Community College which is next to Gainesville, it's automatic, 1334 01:22:21,600 --> 01:22:26,360 Speaker 1: TCC Tallahassee Community College automatic to Florida State It. 1335 01:22:26,520 --> 01:22:29,800 Speaker 2: Yeah, So Florida has more as I think a percentage 1336 01:22:29,840 --> 01:22:32,360 Speaker 2: of its students getting the first two years at a 1337 01:22:32,400 --> 01:22:35,439 Speaker 2: community college and then transferring than any other state in 1338 01:22:35,720 --> 01:22:36,160 Speaker 2: the Union. 1339 01:22:36,360 --> 01:22:39,200 Speaker 1: Well, it's it's more affordable. I mean, look, if I 1340 01:22:39,200 --> 01:22:41,639 Speaker 1: didn't get a scholarship, that was going to be my path. Yeah, 1341 01:22:41,680 --> 01:22:44,800 Speaker 1: you do the two years and then transfer because you know, 1342 01:22:44,880 --> 01:22:47,160 Speaker 1: it's a more affordable way to get a four year degree. 1343 01:22:47,360 --> 01:22:49,519 Speaker 2: I got a son, you know, at Montgomery College on 1344 01:22:49,640 --> 01:22:52,760 Speaker 2: and off, so it is a great way. And to 1345 01:22:52,800 --> 01:22:57,439 Speaker 2: answer the question, community college has benefited some in this 1346 01:22:57,880 --> 01:23:02,400 Speaker 2: big beautiful act because they're going to get they freed 1347 01:23:02,479 --> 01:23:05,200 Speaker 2: up money for short term certificates. 1348 01:23:05,240 --> 01:23:08,680 Speaker 1: These are kind of trade schoolish type of right. 1349 01:23:09,160 --> 01:23:11,639 Speaker 2: They do trade school stuff as community college. That's where 1350 01:23:11,640 --> 01:23:16,920 Speaker 2: most trade school stuff happens. And you know, people don't 1351 01:23:17,000 --> 01:23:19,439 Speaker 2: quite get that, but it's been the case for decades. 1352 01:23:20,120 --> 01:23:23,479 Speaker 2: But these are usually the federal government won't give you 1353 01:23:23,560 --> 01:23:26,280 Speaker 2: a PELL grant if it's not at least a year 1354 01:23:26,320 --> 01:23:28,400 Speaker 2: long program or two year long program. This is for 1355 01:23:28,479 --> 01:23:31,920 Speaker 2: six weeks, eight months. I can forget what the timeframe is. 1356 01:23:32,640 --> 01:23:34,640 Speaker 2: We'll see if it works. Because the quality, there's a 1357 01:23:34,680 --> 01:23:38,080 Speaker 2: question of quality. But this is a potential gusher of 1358 01:23:38,439 --> 01:23:42,800 Speaker 2: new funding for community colleges. But community college is like 1359 01:23:43,080 --> 01:23:47,559 Speaker 2: four year There's just a vast range of quality. Some 1360 01:23:47,600 --> 01:23:50,439 Speaker 2: of them have very low graduation rates, some of them 1361 01:23:50,479 --> 01:23:55,240 Speaker 2: much higher, even holding demographics studies. Some of them are 1362 01:23:55,400 --> 01:23:57,800 Speaker 2: well supported by their regions and states, some of them 1363 01:23:57,840 --> 01:23:58,400 Speaker 2: not so much. 1364 01:23:58,720 --> 01:24:00,840 Speaker 1: So it's a wide despair is what you're saying. There's 1365 01:24:00,840 --> 01:24:02,040 Speaker 1: not a consistency to it. 1366 01:24:02,400 --> 01:24:05,040 Speaker 2: Correct, correct, And and there are some states that just 1367 01:24:05,040 --> 01:24:08,200 Speaker 2: don't have a lot of community colleges. So it's they 1368 01:24:08,240 --> 01:24:12,360 Speaker 2: are fantastic as an institution. We need to do more 1369 01:24:12,400 --> 01:24:15,680 Speaker 2: for them, we need to ask more of them. But 1370 01:24:16,000 --> 01:24:18,880 Speaker 2: I completely agree with you. They are. They are the 1371 01:24:18,920 --> 01:24:20,320 Speaker 2: working end of higher education. 1372 01:24:33,040 --> 01:24:35,519 Speaker 1: Talk about community connection. I mean, I just you know, 1373 01:24:35,600 --> 01:24:38,719 Speaker 1: we had a the way the Miami Dade Community College 1374 01:24:38,720 --> 01:24:42,320 Speaker 1: has multiple campuses all around Dade County, and those campuses 1375 01:24:42,439 --> 01:24:46,400 Speaker 1: also served as sort of host for community events. You 1376 01:24:46,520 --> 01:24:49,719 Speaker 1: might you know, you might take a yoga class there, 1377 01:24:49,840 --> 01:24:55,000 Speaker 1: you might take a quilting class there, like you know. Look, 1378 01:24:55,000 --> 01:24:57,240 Speaker 1: because they had to make money, right, they would offer 1379 01:24:57,400 --> 01:24:59,960 Speaker 1: sort of classes not for degrees, but just sort of 1380 01:25:00,360 --> 01:25:03,240 Speaker 1: community interest classes to yeah, make a couple of bucks 1381 01:25:03,240 --> 01:25:06,000 Speaker 1: to support the education part of things. 1382 01:25:06,200 --> 01:25:10,520 Speaker 2: And the partnerships you find between community colleges and employers, 1383 01:25:11,040 --> 01:25:13,280 Speaker 2: oh yeah, find these at some of the regional public 1384 01:25:13,320 --> 01:25:16,320 Speaker 2: universities too, but even more at the community colleges. If 1385 01:25:16,360 --> 01:25:21,519 Speaker 2: you're an employer, you're you know, an airline, right, and 1386 01:25:21,600 --> 01:25:25,160 Speaker 2: you need people you work with the community college to 1387 01:25:25,240 --> 01:25:29,880 Speaker 2: structure your classes such that they're getting the certificates that 1388 01:25:29,920 --> 01:25:33,440 Speaker 2: they need to then work you know, in the logistics 1389 01:25:33,520 --> 01:25:36,879 Speaker 2: part of your airline or in the accounting or whatever. 1390 01:25:37,360 --> 01:25:40,440 Speaker 2: And you know, maybe they have a paid internship program. 1391 01:25:40,800 --> 01:25:45,200 Speaker 2: So that's where a lot of that academic to employment 1392 01:25:46,200 --> 01:25:51,360 Speaker 2: connection happens or doesn't happen, again, depending on the leadership 1393 01:25:51,400 --> 01:25:54,840 Speaker 2: and the quality of the community college. 1394 01:25:54,960 --> 01:25:56,960 Speaker 1: Well, look, I want to pivot now a little bit 1395 01:25:57,000 --> 01:26:00,720 Speaker 1: to sort of where the state of journalism and for 1396 01:26:00,800 --> 01:26:02,800 Speaker 1: profit all that stuff. But I will just say, I mean, 1397 01:26:02,800 --> 01:26:06,720 Speaker 1: I think this is this is this is what I 1398 01:26:06,760 --> 01:26:09,759 Speaker 1: call service journalism, and it sort of gets at something 1399 01:26:09,800 --> 01:26:14,240 Speaker 1: that I think is overall missing in the conversation that 1400 01:26:14,240 --> 01:26:16,840 Speaker 1: we're having about the future of journalism. And I think 1401 01:26:16,880 --> 01:26:19,439 Speaker 1: sort of where we lost our way collectively, which is 1402 01:26:20,120 --> 01:26:24,760 Speaker 1: just this there's not enough service journalism. We you know, 1403 01:26:26,680 --> 01:26:28,479 Speaker 1: I'm curious what you think of this statement, but I 1404 01:26:28,479 --> 01:26:31,800 Speaker 1: have a friend of mine named Richard Gingris who used 1405 01:26:31,800 --> 01:26:34,160 Speaker 1: to run the Google News Initiative, and he said, you know, 1406 01:26:34,200 --> 01:26:35,840 Speaker 1: the worst thing that happened to journalism was all the 1407 01:26:35,840 --> 01:26:42,000 Speaker 1: president's men. And you know where he's going, because ninety 1408 01:26:42,040 --> 01:26:46,040 Speaker 1: percent of the work of a journalist is in service 1409 01:26:46,080 --> 01:26:49,080 Speaker 1: to their community if they're doing it right, it's ten 1410 01:26:49,120 --> 01:26:52,840 Speaker 1: percent of your work over a lifetime. That is that accountability, right. 1411 01:26:52,920 --> 01:26:55,479 Speaker 1: That is the stuff you want to put in your resume, 1412 01:26:55,640 --> 01:26:58,439 Speaker 1: the stuff you might show up at your obituary, right, 1413 01:26:58,479 --> 01:27:01,600 Speaker 1: the stuff that, yeah, you might apply for an award for. 1414 01:27:02,880 --> 01:27:04,560 Speaker 1: But it's not what most people are going to know 1415 01:27:04,600 --> 01:27:07,559 Speaker 1: your journalism for. And it's not the impact, right, it's 1416 01:27:08,000 --> 01:27:11,719 Speaker 1: and it's it's one of these where this ranking system 1417 01:27:12,680 --> 01:27:18,519 Speaker 1: is more helpful to the average person than doing a 1418 01:27:18,520 --> 01:27:23,800 Speaker 1: ah an audit of of just how campaign spending is 1419 01:27:23,840 --> 01:27:27,200 Speaker 1: working these days between the NRCC and the NRSC. Right, 1420 01:27:27,400 --> 01:27:30,400 Speaker 1: I'm not saying it's an unimportant story, but it's it's 1421 01:27:30,439 --> 01:27:35,840 Speaker 1: not service journalism. And I will tell you in my 1422 01:27:35,920 --> 01:27:39,960 Speaker 1: conversations with young aspiring journalists, they're getting in not to 1423 01:27:40,600 --> 01:27:43,160 Speaker 1: help people figure out how to save money in their life, right, 1424 01:27:43,200 --> 01:27:46,200 Speaker 1: They're getting in because they want to get Joe Biden 1425 01:27:46,280 --> 01:27:48,600 Speaker 1: or get Donald Trump. Right that that they're gonna you know, 1426 01:27:48,600 --> 01:27:53,160 Speaker 1: they're gonna be the next Bob Boarder. How do we 1427 01:27:53,240 --> 01:27:56,200 Speaker 1: inspire people to want to be in service that that 1428 01:27:56,280 --> 01:27:59,160 Speaker 1: journalism is both a service and that part of the 1429 01:27:59,160 --> 01:28:03,400 Speaker 1: public service get you to the point where yes, you 1430 01:28:03,400 --> 01:28:06,200 Speaker 1: you're trying to build some trust so that when you 1431 01:28:06,320 --> 01:28:08,400 Speaker 1: do the accountability, they believe you. 1432 01:28:08,800 --> 01:28:13,280 Speaker 2: Yeah. Look, there's always been a hierarchy in journalism. The 1433 01:28:13,320 --> 01:28:16,880 Speaker 2: people who are out there doing the yeoman's work, right, 1434 01:28:18,400 --> 01:28:24,680 Speaker 2: covering the school board, covering uh, you know, government agencies, 1435 01:28:24,840 --> 01:28:26,920 Speaker 2: covering services. 1436 01:28:27,400 --> 01:28:30,360 Speaker 1: You know, snap benefits. How is that going to work? 1437 01:28:30,439 --> 01:28:32,840 Speaker 1: You know things like this. Yeah, you know, the. 1438 01:28:32,840 --> 01:28:36,519 Speaker 2: Beat reporters, they get their they get their share of 1439 01:28:36,880 --> 01:28:41,400 Speaker 2: of love from the editor. But who rules the roost 1440 01:28:42,200 --> 01:28:46,639 Speaker 2: the political reporters, right, it's the big time investigative reporters. 1441 01:28:47,040 --> 01:28:49,360 Speaker 2: That's where the glory is. That's where you know, you 1442 01:28:49,439 --> 01:28:54,960 Speaker 2: make your most money. And when you compound that by 1443 01:28:55,000 --> 01:29:00,479 Speaker 2: the utter devastation that has taken place in the last 1444 01:29:01,280 --> 01:29:06,519 Speaker 2: really ten years but really more like twenty of local journalism, Chuck, 1445 01:29:06,520 --> 01:29:09,560 Speaker 2: it's dead. They've it's been deloyed. 1446 01:29:09,920 --> 01:29:15,240 Speaker 1: I think it's the single I think it is the it. 1447 01:29:15,640 --> 01:29:19,519 Speaker 1: If you look at the proverbial house of journalism, it 1448 01:29:19,600 --> 01:29:23,400 Speaker 1: turned out local was a foundational right, and you knock 1449 01:29:23,479 --> 01:29:27,840 Speaker 1: out that it collapsed the entire structure. Right, nobody trusts 1450 01:29:27,880 --> 01:29:32,280 Speaker 1: anything because they lost that community tether and that turned 1451 01:29:32,280 --> 01:29:36,280 Speaker 1: out to be the single most important connection we had 1452 01:29:36,400 --> 01:29:37,040 Speaker 1: with the public. 1453 01:29:37,760 --> 01:29:43,280 Speaker 2: So so you know, there's good publications, you know, online, 1454 01:29:44,320 --> 01:29:48,240 Speaker 2: nonprofit publications trying to bring back local reporting, bring back 1455 01:29:48,840 --> 01:29:53,679 Speaker 2: not just accountability reporting like political and bureaucratic, but as 1456 01:29:53,680 --> 01:29:55,320 Speaker 2: you say, the service journalism. 1457 01:29:55,600 --> 01:29:57,320 Speaker 1: Where do I save money? Where can I take my 1458 01:29:57,400 --> 01:29:59,920 Speaker 1: family out of four out to dinner without breaking the bag? 1459 01:30:00,080 --> 01:30:04,639 Speaker 1: I know that seems not like the greatest scoop, but 1460 01:30:04,680 --> 01:30:06,519 Speaker 1: that's actually how you help your community. 1461 01:30:06,640 --> 01:30:08,719 Speaker 2: You know, what are the scores at the high school 1462 01:30:09,000 --> 01:30:13,479 Speaker 2: basketball game? People care about that, and you know it's 1463 01:30:13,560 --> 01:30:16,080 Speaker 2: you can't just get the data. There was a game there, 1464 01:30:16,240 --> 01:30:20,160 Speaker 2: Somebody tell me, tell me what happened. Uh, you know, 1465 01:30:20,960 --> 01:30:27,160 Speaker 2: weather Best drives within three hours of my town. I mean, 1466 01:30:27,240 --> 01:30:32,439 Speaker 2: there's a thousand things that people want and need. But again, 1467 01:30:32,680 --> 01:30:36,720 Speaker 2: the economic underpinnings of that kind of work have disappeared, 1468 01:30:37,080 --> 01:30:41,320 Speaker 2: primarily because of Google and Facebook, and you know there's 1469 01:30:41,360 --> 01:30:45,160 Speaker 2: other reasons for it, but it is primarily the advertising 1470 01:30:45,240 --> 01:30:50,479 Speaker 2: dollar has been hoarded by the Silicon Valley platforms, and 1471 01:30:50,600 --> 01:30:53,320 Speaker 2: without advertising, it is really hard to make it in 1472 01:30:53,360 --> 01:30:57,000 Speaker 2: this in this business, and I run a publication that 1473 01:30:57,520 --> 01:31:02,960 Speaker 2: for a while was doing very well producing online content 1474 01:31:03,040 --> 01:31:06,480 Speaker 2: that was supported by advertising, and then it disappeared. 1475 01:31:06,680 --> 01:31:08,679 Speaker 1: So I've lived in and you don't even know why 1476 01:31:08,680 --> 01:31:11,439 Speaker 1: it disappeared, right because they never were transparent about how 1477 01:31:11,439 --> 01:31:12,679 Speaker 1: the algorithm worked, right. 1478 01:31:12,960 --> 01:31:17,360 Speaker 2: Correct, But you know, in a general sense, we know, right, 1479 01:31:17,479 --> 01:31:26,240 Speaker 2: they monopolized. I mean Google has lost an anti trust 1480 01:31:26,280 --> 01:31:34,479 Speaker 2: case this year monopolizing the ad tech infrastructure, and and 1481 01:31:35,160 --> 01:31:43,120 Speaker 2: they you know, the connection between readers and advertisers at 1482 01:31:43,120 --> 01:31:47,200 Speaker 2: the local level has largely disappeared. There's still some and 1483 01:31:47,240 --> 01:31:49,320 Speaker 2: I think you can come back with the right policies, 1484 01:31:49,360 --> 01:31:53,040 Speaker 2: but boy, it's tough out there, and anybody doing local 1485 01:31:53,080 --> 01:31:57,400 Speaker 2: service journalism, I agree that my hat's off to them. 1486 01:31:57,720 --> 01:32:01,360 Speaker 1: Well, you know, it's interesting the what what I've discovered. 1487 01:32:01,400 --> 01:32:04,679 Speaker 1: I mean, I'm trying to throw myself into this issue 1488 01:32:04,720 --> 01:32:07,040 Speaker 1: a little bit and working on a few projects of 1489 01:32:07,080 --> 01:32:10,120 Speaker 1: trying to is it possible to bring back a to 1490 01:32:10,200 --> 01:32:14,200 Speaker 1: create a for profit local news environment. And what you 1491 01:32:14,280 --> 01:32:16,519 Speaker 1: do find is, you know who else hates the Google 1492 01:32:16,560 --> 01:32:20,400 Speaker 1: ad network? Local businesses. Yeah, they don't like it either. 1493 01:32:20,479 --> 01:32:27,519 Speaker 1: They prefer a personalized connection. They prefer to advertise in 1494 01:32:27,560 --> 01:32:30,759 Speaker 1: an entity that they that they know. Rather there's quote 1495 01:32:30,800 --> 01:32:34,720 Speaker 1: unquote programmatic advertising, you know, et cetera, or you just 1496 01:32:34,760 --> 01:32:37,360 Speaker 1: sort of find people that stumble upon your stuff. And 1497 01:32:39,040 --> 01:32:42,559 Speaker 1: I do think that, but the I don't know whether 1498 01:32:42,680 --> 01:32:46,479 Speaker 1: this is whether you can do this without the help 1499 01:32:46,520 --> 01:32:49,320 Speaker 1: of government, and I and I'm and I'm torn on 1500 01:32:49,400 --> 01:32:52,000 Speaker 1: it because I don't know how much we want government involved. 1501 01:32:52,240 --> 01:32:56,559 Speaker 2: So there's two ways government can help. Government can and philanthropy, right, 1502 01:32:56,720 --> 01:33:02,960 Speaker 2: can underwrite some of the call or government can change 1503 01:33:03,400 --> 01:33:06,840 Speaker 2: the rules of the marketplace from the ones that wrote 1504 01:33:06,880 --> 01:33:09,840 Speaker 2: yesterday or ten or twenty years ago that destroyed the 1505 01:33:09,880 --> 01:33:13,639 Speaker 2: AD dollars two new ones that bring the AD dollars back. 1506 01:33:13,760 --> 01:33:16,240 Speaker 1: Right, Yeah, you can. You can incentive you know, there 1507 01:33:16,280 --> 01:33:20,519 Speaker 1: is some work being done on the state level trying 1508 01:33:20,600 --> 01:33:24,240 Speaker 1: to you know, you might give a tax break to 1509 01:33:24,320 --> 01:33:27,400 Speaker 1: a local business that advertises in a local publication. So 1510 01:33:27,439 --> 01:33:30,200 Speaker 1: it's not a it's not a direct subsidy to the media. 1511 01:33:30,760 --> 01:33:34,400 Speaker 1: It actually you're helping the small business. So it's a frankly, 1512 01:33:34,439 --> 01:33:36,840 Speaker 1: it's a way to write, it's a way to make 1513 01:33:36,840 --> 01:33:39,840 Speaker 1: it a bipartisan ita to be frank yeh, Well. 1514 01:33:39,680 --> 01:33:42,200 Speaker 2: I hope you know the work of my friend and 1515 01:33:42,240 --> 01:33:43,639 Speaker 2: maybe yours, Steve Waldman. 1516 01:33:43,800 --> 01:33:46,719 Speaker 1: Oh, well it's Steve. Yeah, okay, yes, it's Steve's work. 1517 01:33:46,760 --> 01:33:51,120 Speaker 1: He's he's been he's been going legislature by legislature, making 1518 01:33:51,160 --> 01:33:52,120 Speaker 1: this argument. 1519 01:33:53,760 --> 01:33:55,920 Speaker 2: On my board. He's one of my best friends. His 1520 01:33:56,320 --> 01:34:00,400 Speaker 2: organization is Rebuilt Local News, and and you know, I 1521 01:34:00,400 --> 01:34:02,720 Speaker 2: think he's making real progress in this. 1522 01:34:03,240 --> 01:34:05,479 Speaker 1: No, he has. I mean I've We've been at a 1523 01:34:05,560 --> 01:34:08,800 Speaker 1: couple events together as we sort of a are pied 1524 01:34:08,840 --> 01:34:13,639 Speaker 1: pipering this stuff. And it is, it is. Unfortunately, there 1525 01:34:13,720 --> 01:34:16,960 Speaker 1: is a I do think it's still seen through a 1526 01:34:17,000 --> 01:34:21,400 Speaker 1: political lens, right, He's not making the case politic through 1527 01:34:21,439 --> 01:34:24,960 Speaker 1: a political lens, but it's unfortunately local media is being 1528 01:34:24,960 --> 01:34:27,760 Speaker 1: punished for the perception of cable news. You know, I 1529 01:34:27,880 --> 01:34:32,000 Speaker 1: used to scream about this that you know, actually the 1530 01:34:32,240 --> 01:34:34,599 Speaker 1: state of journalism is quite good over the last ten years. 1531 01:34:34,760 --> 01:34:37,200 Speaker 1: It's amazing some of the work that's out there. The 1532 01:34:37,280 --> 01:34:40,559 Speaker 1: problem is our curb appeal, you know. Right, the most 1533 01:34:40,600 --> 01:34:45,280 Speaker 1: prominent news organizations were the three cable channels that really 1534 01:34:45,320 --> 01:34:48,360 Speaker 1: gave journalism a bad reputation. All Right, I'm not going 1535 01:34:48,439 --> 01:34:50,120 Speaker 1: to sit here and say one is bad. I'm not 1536 01:34:50,160 --> 01:34:54,280 Speaker 1: going to get into that. It just the the opinion 1537 01:34:54,320 --> 01:34:58,000 Speaker 1: debates drove the perception of all journalism and it really 1538 01:34:58,080 --> 01:35:00,000 Speaker 1: harmed local more than anybody else. 1539 01:35:00,320 --> 01:35:05,600 Speaker 2: Yeah. I think that's right, and I think what happened is, 1540 01:35:07,320 --> 01:35:09,360 Speaker 2: you know, when I was a kid, when you were 1541 01:35:09,400 --> 01:35:12,280 Speaker 2: a kid, I'm a little older. You you lived in 1542 01:35:12,320 --> 01:35:16,160 Speaker 2: a medium sized city or a small town or rural area. 1543 01:35:17,240 --> 01:35:19,240 Speaker 2: My parents, you know, I grew up in Saint Louis. 1544 01:35:19,280 --> 01:35:24,559 Speaker 2: They read both the Saint Louis papers, and you were 1545 01:35:24,680 --> 01:35:28,719 Speaker 2: getting a lot of local news, and you were getting 1546 01:35:28,760 --> 01:35:31,400 Speaker 2: political news if you if you had a sizable town 1547 01:35:31,479 --> 01:35:35,160 Speaker 2: like Saint Louis, you had your own reporters in Washington 1548 01:35:36,160 --> 01:35:39,840 Speaker 2: covering the industries, covering government. 1549 01:35:39,680 --> 01:35:42,639 Speaker 1: But through the prism of somebody that lived in Saint Louis. Yeah, 1550 01:35:43,439 --> 01:35:44,839 Speaker 1: you know, and that's important. 1551 01:35:44,920 --> 01:35:49,000 Speaker 2: It's important to know what the you know, localizedeers going 1552 01:35:49,000 --> 01:35:51,240 Speaker 2: to do to the rivers, right, and so the best 1553 01:35:51,280 --> 01:35:54,040 Speaker 2: guy covering the Army Corps of Engineers was a Saint 1554 01:35:54,080 --> 01:35:59,160 Speaker 2: Louis Post dispassed reporter. But every town in Missouri, you know, 1555 01:35:59,520 --> 01:36:03,320 Speaker 2: was caring a p They were carrying post dispatch reporting 1556 01:36:03,760 --> 01:36:05,720 Speaker 2: and then they were doing local reporting. And a lot 1557 01:36:05,720 --> 01:36:09,840 Speaker 2: of those small towns they were very conservative, datorially, sure right. 1558 01:36:10,240 --> 01:36:13,479 Speaker 2: But but the news that they were covering, the national 1559 01:36:13,520 --> 01:36:17,400 Speaker 2: news that they were covering was whatever every you know, 1560 01:36:17,920 --> 01:36:23,000 Speaker 2: it was kind of everybody else read differences from writers 1561 01:36:23,000 --> 01:36:33,120 Speaker 2: from from ape, from your top, I'm that, and it 1562 01:36:33,160 --> 01:36:38,920 Speaker 2: was allable checked. Those those small towns no longer have 1563 01:36:39,120 --> 01:36:43,320 Speaker 2: national news, right, they can't afford it, and and a 1564 01:36:43,360 --> 01:36:45,800 Speaker 2: lot of them just disappeared completely. And so where do 1565 01:36:45,840 --> 01:36:48,800 Speaker 2: people small towns get their news. They go to Fox right, 1566 01:36:49,120 --> 01:36:51,960 Speaker 2: or maybe they go to MSNBC, and that's not news. 1567 01:36:52,000 --> 01:36:55,479 Speaker 2: I mean, they're getting bits of reormation, but in a 1568 01:36:56,280 --> 01:36:58,000 Speaker 2: package of partisanship. 1569 01:36:59,040 --> 01:37:01,920 Speaker 1: Now, and it's so in some ways when you're trying 1570 01:37:01,960 --> 01:37:05,560 Speaker 1: to salvage local news, people look at it. Yeah, but 1571 01:37:05,720 --> 01:37:08,040 Speaker 1: do you have an agenda? Right like that? You know, 1572 01:37:08,120 --> 01:37:11,240 Speaker 1: they've been convinced that that that every if the media 1573 01:37:11,320 --> 01:37:13,519 Speaker 1: is manipulated, it must be up and down the entire 1574 01:37:14,200 --> 01:37:16,479 Speaker 1: ecosystem of media, not just on the on the on 1575 01:37:16,560 --> 01:37:17,639 Speaker 1: the national cable side. 1576 01:37:17,640 --> 01:37:19,800 Speaker 2: But you're I'm really fascinated about what you said, Chuck, 1577 01:37:19,960 --> 01:37:25,479 Speaker 2: that businesses want a relationship with their customers. If you 1578 01:37:25,600 --> 01:37:28,759 Speaker 2: run a hospital and a you know, rural or vault 1579 01:37:28,800 --> 01:37:32,600 Speaker 2: in area, uh, you know, all of your business or 1580 01:37:32,680 --> 01:37:35,240 Speaker 2: most of it comes from the region. Right, you run 1581 01:37:35,280 --> 01:37:40,240 Speaker 2: an HVAC company, if you you know, uh, a grocery business, 1582 01:37:41,200 --> 01:37:43,320 Speaker 2: you need that relationship with the local and and the 1583 01:37:43,720 --> 01:37:47,320 Speaker 2: local papers aren't there to provide it. And I think 1584 01:37:47,560 --> 01:37:51,559 Speaker 2: there's an opportunity there. I keep following that trail. 1585 01:37:51,800 --> 01:37:54,080 Speaker 1: I'm like, no, I I am, And look, I'm a 1586 01:37:54,200 --> 01:37:57,800 Speaker 1: huge believer that that look we've got. As I joke, 1587 01:37:57,840 --> 01:38:01,080 Speaker 1: a man named Craig decided classifies out to be YadA, YadA, YadA. 1588 01:38:01,160 --> 01:38:03,759 Speaker 2: The entire local news industry got destroyed. 1589 01:38:06,000 --> 01:38:10,920 Speaker 1: But I still think that it's possible local sports and 1590 01:38:10,960 --> 01:38:15,919 Speaker 1: even youth sports below high school could be the connective 1591 01:38:16,000 --> 01:38:18,600 Speaker 1: tissue that starts the rebuilding process. It may not be 1592 01:38:18,680 --> 01:38:21,720 Speaker 1: the elixir, I mean might it'd be as helpful as 1593 01:38:21,760 --> 01:38:25,320 Speaker 1: classified advertising is. But boy, the one I just look 1594 01:38:25,360 --> 01:38:29,240 Speaker 1: at it as what can bring red and blue together kids? Right, 1595 01:38:29,600 --> 01:38:32,320 Speaker 1: and and we love sports in this country, and now 1596 01:38:32,439 --> 01:38:34,960 Speaker 1: sports is going to be a pipeline to college more 1597 01:38:35,040 --> 01:38:37,600 Speaker 1: than ever before. Right with the variety of you know, 1598 01:38:37,720 --> 01:38:40,639 Speaker 1: with this, with this NI, l're we're making a limp. 1599 01:38:40,800 --> 01:38:44,439 Speaker 1: We're sort of it's possible this new world of nil 1600 01:38:45,000 --> 01:38:49,240 Speaker 1: and sports might actually expand the opportunities of people paying 1601 01:38:49,280 --> 01:38:52,880 Speaker 1: for college with sports the way frankly the arts were 1602 01:38:53,000 --> 01:38:56,040 Speaker 1: used to pay for college, you know, previous generations, and 1603 01:38:56,479 --> 01:38:58,080 Speaker 1: and that's maybe. 1604 01:38:57,880 --> 01:39:00,760 Speaker 2: That's a good thing, let's hope. 1605 01:39:00,800 --> 01:39:03,559 Speaker 1: So I know, I'm not gonna sit here's saying it definitely, 1606 01:39:04,000 --> 01:39:06,880 Speaker 1: but it's possible that this is a that this is 1607 01:39:07,000 --> 01:39:13,080 Speaker 1: a it's a hand up the ladder, not necessarily. Uh uh. 1608 01:39:13,880 --> 01:39:16,439 Speaker 1: You know, I'm not saying some universities aren't going. I mean, 1609 01:39:16,520 --> 01:39:18,799 Speaker 1: what we're seeing in college football is a little insane, 1610 01:39:19,680 --> 01:39:22,880 Speaker 1: but if you go to that next level down, you know, 1611 01:39:23,000 --> 01:39:26,200 Speaker 1: it's really serving as an opportunity for young women. Yep, 1612 01:39:26,640 --> 01:39:28,280 Speaker 1: you know in ways that we've not seen before. 1613 01:39:29,680 --> 01:39:35,719 Speaker 2: And and you know, the Silicon Valley keeps throwing punches. 1614 01:39:37,000 --> 01:39:41,320 Speaker 2: And right now, what's happening to local news is their 1615 01:39:42,000 --> 01:39:47,439 Speaker 2: contents beings great by AI. Right and and there's a 1616 01:39:47,800 --> 01:39:53,920 Speaker 2: pretty fascinating movement happening, uh with a company by the 1617 01:39:54,040 --> 01:39:57,040 Speaker 2: name of cloud Stream. I think it's called you may 1618 01:39:57,080 --> 01:40:01,200 Speaker 2: have looked about it where they host media sites. It 1619 01:40:01,240 --> 01:40:03,600 Speaker 2: holds all kinds of sites and they give you the 1620 01:40:03,720 --> 01:40:08,120 Speaker 2: ability to say, I don't want AI scrape in my side, 1621 01:40:09,040 --> 01:40:11,760 Speaker 2: and you don't have to do anything. It's done automatically 1622 01:40:11,880 --> 01:40:15,720 Speaker 2: for you. Well, that's got the AI folks freaked out 1623 01:40:16,240 --> 01:40:22,280 Speaker 2: because the inability to have real time, fact checked information 1624 01:40:22,800 --> 01:40:27,880 Speaker 2: in local areas turns AI into mush. Right, they've already 1625 01:40:27,880 --> 01:40:30,040 Speaker 2: scraped all the old stuff, and so they've got a lot. 1626 01:40:30,200 --> 01:40:36,360 Speaker 2: But things change, right, Downtown's changed, roads change, people move, 1627 01:40:36,960 --> 01:40:40,280 Speaker 2: and if you can't get that information, and that's what 1628 01:40:40,360 --> 01:40:44,200 Speaker 2: the local you know, press has, so they've got more 1629 01:40:44,280 --> 01:40:45,320 Speaker 2: leverage than they think. 1630 01:40:46,320 --> 01:40:49,200 Speaker 1: Well, it's it's look, I'm not you know, I'm one 1631 01:40:49,240 --> 01:40:51,920 Speaker 1: of those who just views AI neutrally. It can be 1632 01:40:52,040 --> 01:40:55,479 Speaker 1: weaponized for good or weaponized for bad, or frankly, probably 1633 01:40:55,520 --> 01:40:58,560 Speaker 1: a little bit of both. We just have to be 1634 01:40:58,640 --> 01:41:02,679 Speaker 1: smart about how we use it as a tool. Yeah, Paul, 1635 01:41:02,720 --> 01:41:06,720 Speaker 1: this was great. The Washington Monthly is as innovative as ever. 1636 01:41:07,320 --> 01:41:09,160 Speaker 1: And what I like about it is that there's always 1637 01:41:09,640 --> 01:41:13,160 Speaker 1: it's a home for sort of different ideas. It's you know, 1638 01:41:13,600 --> 01:41:17,160 Speaker 1: it's not always the conventional, not just in some ways 1639 01:41:17,240 --> 01:41:21,280 Speaker 1: left right debates get conventional. And I hate to say this, 1640 01:41:21,360 --> 01:41:25,519 Speaker 1: but there's certain editorial pages that, ah, the editorials new 1641 01:41:25,560 --> 01:41:26,879 Speaker 1: but I've read it a hundred times. 1642 01:41:27,160 --> 01:41:30,519 Speaker 2: You kind of know where they're coming from and play 1643 01:41:30,560 --> 01:41:32,479 Speaker 2: in a different version of the same song. 1644 01:41:32,880 --> 01:41:35,760 Speaker 1: Yeah, I mean, you do seem to have a you know, 1645 01:41:36,000 --> 01:41:38,280 Speaker 1: what is it that makes a Washington Monthly story that 1646 01:41:38,560 --> 01:41:41,040 Speaker 1: doesn't make it into the Washington Post? What would be 1647 01:41:41,120 --> 01:41:45,519 Speaker 1: your what? What's the secret ingredient in your mind? 1648 01:41:46,800 --> 01:41:54,439 Speaker 2: We're not afraid to put the same reporting energy into 1649 01:41:55,479 --> 01:42:03,600 Speaker 2: figuring out solutions as slothing out problem and conventional journalism. 1650 01:42:04,439 --> 01:42:07,120 Speaker 2: You know, the opinion section may have a piece or 1651 01:42:07,160 --> 01:42:11,280 Speaker 2: two on some new policy idea, some new way out right, 1652 01:42:11,760 --> 01:42:14,599 Speaker 2: but mostly they feel that that's not their job. 1653 01:42:15,040 --> 01:42:16,679 Speaker 1: No, let me find problems. 1654 01:42:17,400 --> 01:42:21,080 Speaker 2: We find problems. There's no politics there, you know, every 1655 01:42:22,080 --> 01:42:25,080 Speaker 2: but solutions have a kind of political valance or they might. 1656 01:42:26,760 --> 01:42:29,360 Speaker 2: And we do this twenty four to seven. That's what 1657 01:42:29,520 --> 01:42:32,479 Speaker 2: we did. We're more guided by figuring out how to 1658 01:42:32,560 --> 01:42:36,519 Speaker 2: fix things than slew the out. I mean, obviously we uh, 1659 01:42:37,080 --> 01:42:39,040 Speaker 2: you know, one of my colleagues says, you know that 1660 01:42:39,280 --> 01:42:42,080 Speaker 2: the problem with the Monthly is we provide solutions to 1661 01:42:42,160 --> 01:42:45,160 Speaker 2: problems people don't know they have. Oh, there's not much 1662 01:42:45,200 --> 01:42:48,280 Speaker 2: of a market for it. But yeah, and I think 1663 01:42:48,280 --> 01:42:49,439 Speaker 2: that's the big the big difference. 1664 01:42:49,760 --> 01:42:51,280 Speaker 1: Yeah, No, I know. It's like, I think one of 1665 01:42:51,320 --> 01:42:54,160 Speaker 1: the big solutions to some of our political distrust is 1666 01:42:54,240 --> 01:42:58,679 Speaker 1: to expand Congress. Many people don't think that's a problem 1667 01:42:58,760 --> 01:43:00,600 Speaker 1: that needed to be solved. I've had I've had a 1668 01:43:00,680 --> 01:43:04,200 Speaker 1: hard time getting lay people to uh to see that 1669 01:43:04,520 --> 01:43:08,200 Speaker 1: right away. And it's like, just you know, but but 1670 01:43:08,320 --> 01:43:10,880 Speaker 1: I take your point. And yet you know a lot 1671 01:43:10,960 --> 01:43:13,719 Speaker 1: of times what you read today in the Washington Monthly 1672 01:43:14,080 --> 01:43:16,600 Speaker 1: will be a solution that government eventually agrees to in 1673 01:43:16,640 --> 01:43:17,400 Speaker 1: about five years. 1674 01:43:17,720 --> 01:43:20,360 Speaker 2: That's how it works. And we have we have a lot, 1675 01:43:20,400 --> 01:43:21,640 Speaker 2: we have a long record of that. 1676 01:43:22,040 --> 01:43:25,439 Speaker 1: Yes you do, yes, you do well. You recognize Paul 1677 01:43:25,520 --> 01:43:28,080 Speaker 1: Glasters always pleasure, Thank you sir, great to see it. 1678 01:43:28,400 --> 01:43:29,599 Speaker 2: Thanks for having me on. Buddy. 1679 01:43:41,080 --> 01:43:43,400 Speaker 1: Well, I don't know about you, but I am. I 1680 01:43:43,520 --> 01:43:47,080 Speaker 1: want to go visit Maria College now in Kentucky in particular, 1681 01:43:47,680 --> 01:43:51,080 Speaker 1: uh and just see it my see see it for myself. 1682 01:43:52,240 --> 01:43:54,720 Speaker 1: But that was very eye opening conversation I had with 1683 01:43:54,800 --> 01:43:58,679 Speaker 1: Paul and uh do dive in to the Washington Monthly 1684 01:44:00,120 --> 01:44:03,360 Speaker 1: drankings there and how they split it up and they 1685 01:44:03,520 --> 01:44:06,320 Speaker 1: split it up, research different ways to look at it, 1686 01:44:06,439 --> 01:44:10,000 Speaker 1: pure affordability. They have it by region, but it was 1687 01:44:12,040 --> 01:44:15,920 Speaker 1: it really frankly, it made me feel better about the 1688 01:44:16,040 --> 01:44:16,840 Speaker 1: state of Higher ed. 1689 01:44:16,920 --> 01:44:17,040 Speaker 2: Now. 1690 01:44:17,080 --> 01:44:21,519 Speaker 1: I'm obviously really concerned if we're gonna if if this, 1691 01:44:22,439 --> 01:44:27,320 Speaker 1: if the federal funding attacks end up making life miserable 1692 01:44:27,400 --> 01:44:31,240 Speaker 1: for the smaller colleges as we go forward. But anyway, 1693 01:44:31,360 --> 01:44:32,080 Speaker 1: let's do a few. 1694 01:44:32,000 --> 01:44:41,280 Speaker 2: Q and as as Chuck as Chuck. 1695 01:44:55,439 --> 01:44:57,680 Speaker 1: This one comes from John A from New Orleans. Hey, Chuck, 1696 01:44:57,760 --> 01:45:00,120 Speaker 1: really loved the cast. As Mayor Koch would say, you 1697 01:45:00,160 --> 01:45:02,720 Speaker 1: are a voice of reason. I appreciate that. Here's an 1698 01:45:02,760 --> 01:45:04,400 Speaker 1: idea that I would like your feedback on. We use 1699 01:45:04,439 --> 01:45:06,400 Speaker 1: the tax code to influence behavior all the time, yes, 1700 01:45:06,479 --> 01:45:08,760 Speaker 1: we do. Why not do it to encourage a true 1701 01:45:08,800 --> 01:45:11,320 Speaker 1: democratic good. Give people a seventy five dollars tax credit 1702 01:45:11,360 --> 01:45:13,800 Speaker 1: every time they vote in a national election. More voters 1703 01:45:13,800 --> 01:45:17,639 Speaker 1: would significantly change voting dynamics. It would give third parties 1704 01:45:17,640 --> 01:45:20,439 Speaker 1: a real shot in the arm. The effect would be profound, 1705 01:45:21,080 --> 01:45:23,880 Speaker 1: and we wouldn't need a constitutional convention to make the change. 1706 01:45:24,000 --> 01:45:33,479 Speaker 1: Thoughts interesting, So we're paying people to vote. I guess 1707 01:45:33,720 --> 01:45:36,240 Speaker 1: that's you know, it's not like Austria. What is I 1708 01:45:36,280 --> 01:45:42,760 Speaker 1: think it's Australia that has sort of mandatory voting. I 1709 01:45:42,840 --> 01:45:49,040 Speaker 1: don't know, I'm I hear what you're saying. There's a 1710 01:45:49,120 --> 01:45:52,559 Speaker 1: part of me. There's a lyric from an old Rush song. 1711 01:45:52,680 --> 01:45:54,840 Speaker 1: If you choose not to decide, you still have made 1712 01:45:54,880 --> 01:46:01,519 Speaker 1: a choice. It's their song free will. So are we 1713 01:46:01,560 --> 01:46:03,880 Speaker 1: going to financially penalize people who decide they want to 1714 01:46:03,880 --> 01:46:06,000 Speaker 1: sit out a national election? You see where I'm going here, 1715 01:46:06,160 --> 01:46:10,280 Speaker 1: So I hear where you're going. I you know, we 1716 01:46:10,360 --> 01:46:13,080 Speaker 1: had that back and I don't know. I'm not going 1717 01:46:13,160 --> 01:46:14,760 Speaker 1: to guess what your age is. But there was a 1718 01:46:14,840 --> 01:46:17,160 Speaker 1: time where you used to be able to check off 1719 01:46:17,200 --> 01:46:20,960 Speaker 1: on your tax returns. You know, yes, I want, you know, 1720 01:46:21,080 --> 01:46:24,000 Speaker 1: a dollar, one dollar of my tax return to go 1721 01:46:24,200 --> 01:46:29,479 Speaker 1: to the presidential presidential campaign fund. This was back when 1722 01:46:29,520 --> 01:46:32,599 Speaker 1: presidential candidates would get matching funds. We had a period 1723 01:46:32,640 --> 01:46:34,439 Speaker 1: of time where we were hoping to at least partially 1724 01:46:34,600 --> 01:46:37,880 Speaker 1: public fund elections to keep you know, to sort of 1725 01:46:38,120 --> 01:46:41,439 Speaker 1: keep the influence of money down. Well, eventually, you know, 1726 01:46:41,800 --> 01:46:43,439 Speaker 1: I think George W. Bush was the first one to 1727 01:46:43,439 --> 01:46:45,360 Speaker 1: be able to raise enough money not having to worry 1728 01:46:45,400 --> 01:46:47,200 Speaker 1: about the federal system. And then all of a sudden, 1729 01:46:47,200 --> 01:46:50,320 Speaker 1: everybody got out of it and so it's it's sort 1730 01:46:50,360 --> 01:46:54,720 Speaker 1: of lost its relevance. But I do agree with you 1731 01:46:54,960 --> 01:46:58,480 Speaker 1: generally that the tax code is a good that financial 1732 01:46:58,960 --> 01:47:01,400 Speaker 1: financial incentive. In some ways. It goes back to the 1733 01:47:01,640 --> 01:47:06,320 Speaker 1: incentive issue. Right, if you want if you want better outcomes, 1734 01:47:06,400 --> 01:47:09,040 Speaker 1: then create better incentives. Right. If you think more people 1735 01:47:09,120 --> 01:47:13,599 Speaker 1: need to participate, then that is one idea to certainly 1736 01:47:13,640 --> 01:47:18,080 Speaker 1: incentivize people to do it. I still think that the 1737 01:47:18,120 --> 01:47:21,519 Speaker 1: bigger issue is we need equal access to the ballot, 1738 01:47:21,600 --> 01:47:26,120 Speaker 1: and you need equal access to vote for everybody, right, 1739 01:47:26,200 --> 01:47:31,240 Speaker 1: And I do think primaries, particularly state run, state funded primaries, 1740 01:47:31,400 --> 01:47:34,880 Speaker 1: do violate equal protection. You know. The fact is, if 1741 01:47:34,880 --> 01:47:37,000 Speaker 1: I'm not a registered voter of that party, I can't 1742 01:47:37,000 --> 01:47:42,000 Speaker 1: participate in that taxpayer funded election. That feels like a penalty. 1743 01:47:44,080 --> 01:47:47,160 Speaker 1: And so I do think that if you're looking at 1744 01:47:47,200 --> 01:47:52,439 Speaker 1: one thing, one single thing that we could do differently 1745 01:47:52,520 --> 01:47:57,000 Speaker 1: that might actually have massive impact on our politics, is 1746 01:47:57,040 --> 01:48:02,360 Speaker 1: if we got rid of partisan primaries altogether and had 1747 01:48:02,640 --> 01:48:06,959 Speaker 1: essentially everybody, you know, like the mayor's races, all party primaries. 1748 01:48:09,040 --> 01:48:12,719 Speaker 1: So I'm with you on uh using the tax code 1749 01:48:12,720 --> 01:48:17,600 Speaker 1: as a way to incentivize better behavior. I struggle with 1750 01:48:17,720 --> 01:48:20,360 Speaker 1: the idea of using it as a reward for voting. 1751 01:48:21,760 --> 01:48:27,920 Speaker 1: You know, it's sort of there's it that I in 1752 01:48:28,000 --> 01:48:31,479 Speaker 1: a weird way that feels, you know, one step away 1753 01:48:31,520 --> 01:48:34,479 Speaker 1: from buying a vote. Right, So there's a I just 1754 01:48:34,840 --> 01:48:39,200 Speaker 1: I'll admit I'm slightly uncomfortable with that larger concept, but 1755 01:48:39,320 --> 01:48:42,479 Speaker 1: I am quite comfortable with using the tax code to 1756 01:48:42,560 --> 01:48:45,600 Speaker 1: incentive I mean, look, home ownership in some ways is 1757 01:48:47,360 --> 01:48:51,160 Speaker 1: promoted because of the tech. We promote home ownership through 1758 01:48:51,200 --> 01:48:55,960 Speaker 1: the tax code with mortgage deduction. So there's always I think, 1759 01:48:56,040 --> 01:49:00,280 Speaker 1: good ways to use the tax code to help to 1760 01:49:00,400 --> 01:49:05,080 Speaker 1: help people, if you will. But interesting thought and certainly 1761 01:49:05,120 --> 01:49:09,040 Speaker 1: worth chewing on. Thanks for the question, John, all right. 1762 01:49:09,080 --> 01:49:10,880 Speaker 1: Next question comes from Carry and saying Lewis, Hey, Chuck, 1763 01:49:10,920 --> 01:49:13,479 Speaker 1: You've mentioned the logistical challenge of third parties, but with 1764 01:49:13,600 --> 01:49:16,439 Speaker 1: Democrats wandering in the wilderness and Republicans without a platform, 1765 01:49:16,760 --> 01:49:19,439 Speaker 1: what about an American unity platform that anyone running could 1766 01:49:19,439 --> 01:49:22,479 Speaker 1: pledge to support. Focus on making government more responsive to 1767 01:49:22,560 --> 01:49:24,479 Speaker 1: the needs of citizens, working to get big money out 1768 01:49:24,479 --> 01:49:28,719 Speaker 1: of politics, constitutional convention ending germ mandering, maybe even required 1769 01:49:29,400 --> 01:49:32,719 Speaker 1: civic service for young people. Yes, I'm huge national service person. 1770 01:49:33,120 --> 01:49:35,200 Speaker 1: Could that work? What would you include in this platform. 1771 01:49:35,280 --> 01:49:38,880 Speaker 1: Thanks and I love the history highlights. Oh great best wishes. Look, 1772 01:49:38,920 --> 01:49:42,040 Speaker 1: I love this And in many ways what you're describing 1773 01:49:42,160 --> 01:49:46,280 Speaker 1: is what my late mentor Doug Bailey, when he Unity 1774 01:49:46,600 --> 01:49:48,679 Speaker 1: eight is what he called it back in two thousand 1775 01:49:48,720 --> 01:49:51,880 Speaker 1: and eight. In the run up to that election, he 1776 01:49:52,040 --> 01:49:54,519 Speaker 1: was trying to create a process that could help nominate 1777 01:49:54,600 --> 01:49:59,760 Speaker 1: a bipartisan ticket. Well, then the two parties nominated the 1778 01:49:59,760 --> 01:50:02,679 Speaker 1: two the most bipartisan people that were running. Right, Literally, 1779 01:50:03,000 --> 01:50:07,000 Speaker 1: the most popular Democrat among Republicans was Barack Obama and 1780 01:50:07,040 --> 01:50:10,800 Speaker 1: the most popular Republican among Democrats was John McCain. They 1781 01:50:10,920 --> 01:50:13,479 Speaker 1: both did well among independents, and they both won their nomination, 1782 01:50:13,600 --> 01:50:16,680 Speaker 1: So it made Unity eight kind of a pointless exercise. 1783 01:50:16,720 --> 01:50:21,400 Speaker 1: He was anticipating that it would be Hillary Clinton and 1784 01:50:21,479 --> 01:50:25,719 Speaker 1: Rudy Giuliani right, a more polarizing, divisive matchup that would 1785 01:50:25,720 --> 01:50:31,439 Speaker 1: then leave room for a more unifying bipartisan ticket. But 1786 01:50:31,720 --> 01:50:35,800 Speaker 1: it is, you know, he and in fact, what is 1787 01:50:36,320 --> 01:50:40,880 Speaker 1: the today's Forward Party has some of the remnants of 1788 01:50:41,080 --> 01:50:43,439 Speaker 1: what Doug began. Some of the folks that have been 1789 01:50:43,760 --> 01:50:47,320 Speaker 1: working on the Open Primaries movement to try to sort 1790 01:50:47,320 --> 01:50:50,880 Speaker 1: of get rid of partisan primaries. The gentleman that's been 1791 01:50:50,920 --> 01:50:56,479 Speaker 1: working on trying to get rank choice voting to be 1792 01:50:56,600 --> 01:50:59,519 Speaker 1: considered in other states. All of it is derivative of 1793 01:51:00,160 --> 01:51:06,960 Speaker 1: what Doug began with Unity O eight. And I will 1794 01:51:07,000 --> 01:51:09,320 Speaker 1: tell you this, You are to me on the right 1795 01:51:09,479 --> 01:51:14,000 Speaker 1: path of what kind of to me that look in 1796 01:51:14,040 --> 01:51:16,320 Speaker 1: an ideal word would be a four party system. I 1797 01:51:16,439 --> 01:51:18,880 Speaker 1: think that's I'm not gonna I'm trying to be realistic here. 1798 01:51:19,560 --> 01:51:24,320 Speaker 1: The most the most likely way that a third party 1799 01:51:24,360 --> 01:51:28,880 Speaker 1: could have an impact is sort of helping to reform 1800 01:51:29,200 --> 01:51:33,960 Speaker 1: the two major parties by sort of running a race 1801 01:51:34,040 --> 01:51:37,400 Speaker 1: that did this and I think you don't you want 1802 01:51:37,439 --> 01:51:40,000 Speaker 1: to plan And this gets it to a debate that 1803 01:51:40,680 --> 01:51:44,400 Speaker 1: I know some folks that are involved with the Forward Party, 1804 01:51:44,960 --> 01:51:47,439 Speaker 1: Andrew Yang, Christie Whitman Party, the sort of the third 1805 01:51:47,479 --> 01:51:50,639 Speaker 1: party movement where there's a debate are they a movement 1806 01:51:50,800 --> 01:51:53,120 Speaker 1: to try to get the two parties to become more 1807 01:51:53,200 --> 01:51:55,760 Speaker 1: rational or do they want to be their own standalone 1808 01:51:55,800 --> 01:51:58,400 Speaker 1: party that essentially replaces one of the two major parties 1809 01:51:59,640 --> 01:52:03,080 Speaker 1: and why? And if you're going to be one thing, 1810 01:52:03,160 --> 01:52:06,559 Speaker 1: then you're going to have more issues you might take 1811 01:52:06,560 --> 01:52:08,600 Speaker 1: a stand on. And the more issues you take a 1812 01:52:08,640 --> 01:52:12,559 Speaker 1: stand on the more opportunity you have of potentially pushing 1813 01:52:12,640 --> 01:52:14,640 Speaker 1: some people, you know, away, If you're trying to be 1814 01:52:14,760 --> 01:52:20,680 Speaker 1: this sort of moderate party that sort of shoots, you know, 1815 01:52:20,760 --> 01:52:23,400 Speaker 1: that sort of shoots the gap in between the two parties, 1816 01:52:24,400 --> 01:52:26,519 Speaker 1: then I do think you want a platform like the 1817 01:52:26,560 --> 01:52:29,000 Speaker 1: one you describe, where hey, look, we need to we 1818 01:52:29,080 --> 01:52:32,880 Speaker 1: need to make some massive reforms in how the democracy works. 1819 01:52:34,840 --> 01:52:36,759 Speaker 1: And this isn't going to be about whether we should 1820 01:52:36,800 --> 01:52:39,280 Speaker 1: have more immigrants or less immigrants. This is about whether 1821 01:52:39,360 --> 01:52:43,280 Speaker 1: we're going to have a system that is easily understandable 1822 01:52:43,280 --> 01:52:44,439 Speaker 1: and how immigration works. 1823 01:52:44,560 --> 01:52:44,640 Speaker 2: Right. 1824 01:52:44,960 --> 01:52:48,599 Speaker 1: It is almost like a technocratic campaign that you would run. Now, 1825 01:52:48,680 --> 01:52:50,439 Speaker 1: the problem with that is I think you need an 1826 01:52:50,520 --> 01:52:55,320 Speaker 1: incredibly charismatic individual to be the leader of that movement. 1827 01:52:55,439 --> 01:52:57,960 Speaker 1: Ross Perrot had his own charisma, Teddy Roosevelt had his 1828 01:52:58,000 --> 01:53:01,160 Speaker 1: own charisma. Shoot even George waller Us, who was arguably 1829 01:53:01,560 --> 01:53:05,840 Speaker 1: had some success at least in shifting that election to 1830 01:53:06,000 --> 01:53:12,200 Speaker 1: Nixon in sixty eight, had had enough charisma to lead 1831 01:53:12,240 --> 01:53:14,880 Speaker 1: a movement. So there is a you can't just do 1832 01:53:15,040 --> 01:53:21,519 Speaker 1: this as a dry technocratic exercise. But I do think 1833 01:53:23,320 --> 01:53:27,080 Speaker 1: going after process and talking about how we need the 1834 01:53:27,160 --> 01:53:30,240 Speaker 1: structural reform of the democracy. And I think post Trump 1835 01:53:30,360 --> 01:53:32,519 Speaker 1: there'll be an appetite for this. The question is is 1836 01:53:32,560 --> 01:53:34,479 Speaker 1: there an appetite for it in twenty eight or do 1837 01:53:34,600 --> 01:53:37,920 Speaker 1: we need sort of a couple more years removed from 1838 01:53:38,000 --> 01:53:42,160 Speaker 1: Trump before there'll be a full appetite for this. But 1839 01:53:43,520 --> 01:53:46,479 Speaker 1: American Unity Platform, I mean, I'm going to keep saying 1840 01:53:46,520 --> 01:53:48,160 Speaker 1: it over and over. So my friends at the Forward 1841 01:53:48,160 --> 01:53:52,439 Speaker 1: Party who I know listened to this podcast regularly. It's 1842 01:53:52,479 --> 01:53:56,880 Speaker 1: a good idea because, especially if it's about how you 1843 01:53:57,080 --> 01:53:59,280 Speaker 1: centered it, how do you make government more responsive? Right? 1844 01:53:59,360 --> 01:54:02,200 Speaker 1: Things I'd put in there is doubling the size of 1845 01:54:02,240 --> 01:54:05,240 Speaker 1: the House. Right, maybe it's a constitutional amendment that says, 1846 01:54:05,640 --> 01:54:09,000 Speaker 1: you know, no congressional district can be you know, bigger 1847 01:54:09,040 --> 01:54:11,519 Speaker 1: than point zero zero zero one percent of the population, 1848 01:54:11,840 --> 01:54:14,160 Speaker 1: which would give a metric so that way you could 1849 01:54:14,160 --> 01:54:17,679 Speaker 1: deal in case our population shrinks overtime rather than expands. 1850 01:54:18,640 --> 01:54:20,080 Speaker 1: But that's something I would put in there because I 1851 01:54:20,120 --> 01:54:22,200 Speaker 1: think that would be something that would make us more responsive. 1852 01:54:22,240 --> 01:54:25,160 Speaker 1: Getting rid of partisan primaries where you're doing things that 1853 01:54:25,280 --> 01:54:28,840 Speaker 1: are not about specific issues themselves, because that's where you 1854 01:54:28,920 --> 01:54:32,800 Speaker 1: start to a third Parties can sometimes lose support almost 1855 01:54:33,080 --> 01:54:38,880 Speaker 1: the more positions you start taking. So it is it is. 1856 01:54:39,560 --> 01:54:44,480 Speaker 1: You certainly have warmed my heart in what you're prescribing. 1857 01:54:44,600 --> 01:54:48,480 Speaker 1: But one of the things that I've learned is when 1858 01:54:48,480 --> 01:54:50,600 Speaker 1: you have the luxury to worry about this, and you 1859 01:54:50,640 --> 01:54:53,400 Speaker 1: don't have a financial crisis in your life or a 1860 01:54:53,440 --> 01:54:57,200 Speaker 1: healthcare crisis, you have the luxury to worry about the democracy. 1861 01:54:57,240 --> 01:54:59,280 Speaker 1: There's a lot of voters out there who, in theory 1862 01:54:59,680 --> 01:55:02,200 Speaker 1: might have with this platform, but are more worried about 1863 01:55:02,240 --> 01:55:04,240 Speaker 1: the near term and are going to be more in 1864 01:55:04,360 --> 01:55:08,400 Speaker 1: tune with somebody that's going to throw them a bone immediately, right, 1865 01:55:08,480 --> 01:55:11,600 Speaker 1: a benefit bone of some sort immediately. And I think 1866 01:55:11,680 --> 01:55:14,640 Speaker 1: that's that's the only risk in trying to run a 1867 01:55:14,880 --> 01:55:17,960 Speaker 1: very sort of let's fix the democracy, because you almost 1868 01:55:18,000 --> 01:55:20,480 Speaker 1: have to have a majority agreement that it's broken, and 1869 01:55:20,520 --> 01:55:23,520 Speaker 1: we're getting there, right. We have over sixty percent saying 1870 01:55:23,520 --> 01:55:27,160 Speaker 1: we're in a political crisis. So it may be that 1871 01:55:27,360 --> 01:55:31,560 Speaker 1: by the fall of twenty seven this is a very 1872 01:55:31,800 --> 01:55:36,800 Speaker 1: appealing idea, which is but the idea of just putting 1873 01:55:36,840 --> 01:55:41,160 Speaker 1: out a platform, almost without a candidate and even without 1874 01:55:41,160 --> 01:55:44,560 Speaker 1: a political party, is an interesting idea as well. So anyway, 1875 01:55:45,240 --> 01:55:46,800 Speaker 1: you've given me a lot to chew On that that's 1876 01:55:46,960 --> 01:55:48,440 Speaker 1: this is not something I want to give up. The 1877 01:55:48,480 --> 01:55:52,160 Speaker 1: American Unity platform. I love, I love how that sounds 1878 01:55:53,040 --> 01:55:57,320 Speaker 1: all right. Next question comes from Heather from Littleton, Colorado. Hey, there, 1879 01:55:57,360 --> 01:55:59,800 Speaker 1: I heard you chat your chat with Chrystaliza and appreciated 1880 01:55:59,840 --> 01:56:02,200 Speaker 1: what she said about Trump being the worst role model 1881 01:56:02,200 --> 01:56:03,840 Speaker 1: for our children. I have two boys, and my younger 1882 01:56:03,880 --> 01:56:06,200 Speaker 1: son was born on election Day twenty sixteen. I remember 1883 01:56:06,240 --> 01:56:08,440 Speaker 1: sitting in the hospital, heartbroken that our country had elected 1884 01:56:08,440 --> 01:56:10,880 Speaker 1: a man who embodied everything I didn't want them to become. 1885 01:56:11,280 --> 01:56:14,080 Speaker 1: As a lifelong Conservative and former staffer for Rix and Torum, 1886 01:56:14,600 --> 01:56:16,560 Speaker 1: I even voted for Hillary Clinton that year because I 1887 01:56:16,640 --> 01:56:19,360 Speaker 1: feared that would happen under his presidency. Sadly, both his 1888 01:56:19,480 --> 01:56:24,440 Speaker 1: temperament and character have only worsened. Sense Heather from Littleton, Colorado. Well, 1889 01:56:25,040 --> 01:56:28,040 Speaker 1: you know this goes to the issue of character, and 1890 01:56:28,160 --> 01:56:34,520 Speaker 1: it goes back to for whatever reason, and I think 1891 01:56:35,280 --> 01:56:39,560 Speaker 1: in sixteen, look, I think you and I share a 1892 01:56:39,600 --> 01:56:42,000 Speaker 1: similar way that we vote, which is, I do character 1893 01:56:42,080 --> 01:56:45,120 Speaker 1: matters a lot, right. I think character is destiny. I 1894 01:56:45,200 --> 01:56:47,440 Speaker 1: think high character people are going to do the right thing. 1895 01:56:47,520 --> 01:56:49,400 Speaker 1: Low character people are more likely to do the wrong 1896 01:56:49,440 --> 01:56:53,600 Speaker 1: thing or more likely to be out for themselves, and 1897 01:56:53,720 --> 01:57:01,000 Speaker 1: I certainly believe that. Unfortunately, a second Trump term has perhaps, Look, 1898 01:57:01,080 --> 01:57:05,720 Speaker 1: we're courser, we just are as a society, and you 1899 01:57:05,840 --> 01:57:12,440 Speaker 1: can't tell me it's disconnected from the way Donald Trump 1900 01:57:12,520 --> 01:57:17,920 Speaker 1: has modeled himself for the American people. I mean, you 1901 01:57:18,040 --> 01:57:20,800 Speaker 1: may have heard me say this. I think the American 1902 01:57:20,920 --> 01:57:26,800 Speaker 1: bad behavior at Bethpage Black during the Ryder Cup is 1903 01:57:27,280 --> 01:57:31,440 Speaker 1: representative of the Trump era. Do I say Trump himself 1904 01:57:31,680 --> 01:57:34,480 Speaker 1: go toed those people to behave that way? No, I'm 1905 01:57:34,520 --> 01:57:37,080 Speaker 1: not going to go that far. But I think his 1906 01:57:37,280 --> 01:57:40,040 Speaker 1: behavior gives a permission slip that it's okay to sort 1907 01:57:40,080 --> 01:57:46,720 Speaker 1: of be be rude, be dismissive, be dehumanizing. Hey, if 1908 01:57:46,760 --> 01:57:49,480 Speaker 1: the president does it, why can't I. And of course 1909 01:57:49,760 --> 01:57:52,600 Speaker 1: this gets it to what we're watching how the Democrats 1910 01:57:52,640 --> 01:58:01,280 Speaker 1: are dealing with this Virginia issue, where there was there 1911 01:58:01,400 --> 01:58:04,200 Speaker 1: was an attempt to hold Republicans accountable when they misbehaved 1912 01:58:04,680 --> 01:58:06,360 Speaker 1: like this, and there are a lot of Democrats who 1913 01:58:06,400 --> 01:58:11,040 Speaker 1: were lecturing Republicans for not holding their own side accountable. 1914 01:58:11,080 --> 01:58:14,560 Speaker 1: And here you have something on the Democratic side and 1915 01:58:15,040 --> 01:58:18,320 Speaker 1: they're not immediately taking the moral high ground here on character, 1916 01:58:18,400 --> 01:58:22,000 Speaker 1: and it's you know how much of that is and 1917 01:58:22,120 --> 01:58:25,360 Speaker 1: you see that sort of some supporters of Jay Jones 1918 01:58:25,360 --> 01:58:28,080 Speaker 1: have essentially said, well, if Trump can do it, why 1919 01:58:28,200 --> 01:58:31,720 Speaker 1: can't Why can't we is essentially, you know, if the 1920 01:58:31,840 --> 01:58:33,840 Speaker 1: voters are going to forgive him, why wouldn't the voters 1921 01:58:34,640 --> 01:58:38,040 Speaker 1: forgive j Jones? And maybe that is the case. Maybe 1922 01:58:38,680 --> 01:58:42,840 Speaker 1: the electorate has given up that politicians can be good people. 1923 01:58:44,600 --> 01:58:49,480 Speaker 1: But unfortunately, right now I do think the I think 1924 01:58:49,560 --> 01:58:51,640 Speaker 1: good people are afraid to run for office. And I 1925 01:58:51,800 --> 01:58:58,280 Speaker 1: think there is a sense that if you're morally ambiguous 1926 01:58:58,360 --> 01:59:03,280 Speaker 1: person but you're looking for legitimacy in society, holding office 1927 01:59:03,280 --> 01:59:06,320 Speaker 1: suddenly gives you legitimacy. You know. It brings up a 1928 01:59:06,400 --> 01:59:08,240 Speaker 1: quote I've been meaning to share with you guys, but 1929 01:59:08,320 --> 01:59:12,000 Speaker 1: I just haven't had the right I just haven't had 1930 01:59:12,040 --> 01:59:13,720 Speaker 1: the right moment to bring it up. But I'm going 1931 01:59:13,760 --> 01:59:16,680 Speaker 1: to go find the quote for you. So Madison Cawthorne, 1932 01:59:16,840 --> 01:59:21,440 Speaker 1: the kid who was sort of who when he came 1933 01:59:21,480 --> 01:59:24,600 Speaker 1: to Congress sort of was just he admitted the only 1934 01:59:24,600 --> 01:59:26,760 Speaker 1: staff he wanted to hire work communication staff. He didn't 1935 01:59:26,800 --> 01:59:29,600 Speaker 1: really see the job as representing his constituents. He saw 1936 01:59:29,680 --> 01:59:33,880 Speaker 1: it as just messaging and trolling. He offended so many 1937 01:59:33,960 --> 01:59:37,040 Speaker 1: Republicans that they recruited a candidate to primary m get 1938 01:59:37,120 --> 01:59:40,440 Speaker 1: him out of office. And he was a one term 1939 01:59:40,480 --> 01:59:43,320 Speaker 1: wonder Well, now he has shown up in Florida and 1940 01:59:43,360 --> 01:59:45,240 Speaker 1: he wants to run for the open seat that Byron 1941 01:59:45,280 --> 01:59:50,600 Speaker 1: Donald's is vacating to run for governor. Well, he's not 1942 01:59:50,760 --> 01:59:55,120 Speaker 1: the only former member of Congress running in that district 1943 01:59:55,800 --> 02:00:00,320 Speaker 1: for Byron Donalds. There's another disgraced former member of Congress 1944 02:00:00,800 --> 02:00:03,560 Speaker 1: that's also running in that race. It is Chris Collins. 1945 02:00:04,120 --> 02:00:05,880 Speaker 1: And if you're wondering who Chris Collins is, he was 1946 02:00:05,960 --> 02:00:09,760 Speaker 1: a Republican Member of Congress from the from Western New York, 1947 02:00:09,840 --> 02:00:15,240 Speaker 1: representing the Buffalo area and he was notable at first. 1948 02:00:15,320 --> 02:00:16,520 Speaker 1: I mean I could tell you how he got my 1949 02:00:16,720 --> 02:00:18,680 Speaker 1: radar and first time I interviewed me. He was the 1950 02:00:18,800 --> 02:00:21,080 Speaker 1: only member of congres. He's the first member of the 1951 02:00:21,160 --> 02:00:24,520 Speaker 1: House of Representative, the first House Republican to officially endorse 1952 02:00:24,560 --> 02:00:28,160 Speaker 1: Donald Trump. And for the longest time, he was the 1953 02:00:28,400 --> 02:00:32,680 Speaker 1: only one that endorsed Donald Trump. I mean, it was 1954 02:00:33,720 --> 02:00:37,440 Speaker 1: it was, it was something else, and he was the 1955 02:00:37,480 --> 02:00:39,560 Speaker 1: only one, and he was sort of he was kind 1956 02:00:39,600 --> 02:00:43,200 Speaker 1: of I enjoyed interviewing him, and in fact, I'm going 1957 02:00:43,280 --> 02:00:46,000 Speaker 1: to try to book him for the podcast because this 1958 02:00:46,200 --> 02:00:48,840 Speaker 1: quote really stood out to me, and I'll get to 1959 02:00:48,920 --> 02:00:50,800 Speaker 1: it in a minute, but it sort of gets it 1960 02:00:50,880 --> 02:00:54,440 Speaker 1: to what I fear elected office has become for too 1961 02:00:54,520 --> 02:00:59,680 Speaker 1: many character challenged people, and perhaps describing Chris Collins this 1962 02:00:59,760 --> 02:01:03,960 Speaker 1: way will make him not want to come on. But 1963 02:01:04,280 --> 02:01:06,280 Speaker 1: one of the things I found interesting about him is 1964 02:01:06,320 --> 02:01:09,280 Speaker 1: that he seemed to be comfortable in his own skin, 1965 02:01:09,400 --> 02:01:11,680 Speaker 1: willing to sort of take any question and sometimes say 1966 02:01:11,800 --> 02:01:14,280 Speaker 1: things out loud that you're shocked that he would say, 1967 02:01:14,920 --> 02:01:18,280 Speaker 1: which brings me to this quote. So he's among again. 1968 02:01:18,360 --> 02:01:22,640 Speaker 1: Madison Cawthorne is running in this race. So's Chris Collins, right, 1969 02:01:22,760 --> 02:01:24,520 Speaker 1: the former New Yorker you had to resign in twenty 1970 02:01:24,600 --> 02:01:29,360 Speaker 1: nineteen after he pled guilty to some insider trading. Collins, 1971 02:01:29,400 --> 02:01:34,000 Speaker 1: who's now seventy five, he suggested that he wasn't coming 1972 02:01:34,080 --> 02:01:37,520 Speaker 1: out of involuntary retirement purely because of his desire to 1973 02:01:37,680 --> 02:01:40,800 Speaker 1: serve his new community in Southwest Florida. Here's what he 1974 02:01:40,960 --> 02:01:44,640 Speaker 1: said to a podcast in August. He said, quote, if 1975 02:01:44,680 --> 02:01:47,640 Speaker 1: I then retire as a congressman from Florida nineteen and 1976 02:01:47,720 --> 02:01:50,919 Speaker 1: Marco Island in Naples. I think I would be welcomed 1977 02:01:51,000 --> 02:01:53,120 Speaker 1: then to serve on some of the you know, the 1978 02:01:53,240 --> 02:01:56,480 Speaker 1: not for profit boards and hospital boards and being invited 1979 02:01:56,560 --> 02:01:59,880 Speaker 1: to the you know, fundraisers in galas and being welcome. 1980 02:02:00,840 --> 02:02:03,360 Speaker 1: He said, that would be a great retirement because right 1981 02:02:03,480 --> 02:02:05,960 Speaker 1: now it's kind of lonely. He goes, you know, I'm 1982 02:02:06,000 --> 02:02:08,440 Speaker 1: not invited to any of those things, because all I 1983 02:02:08,560 --> 02:02:12,360 Speaker 1: am is, you know, the former congressman who resigned in disgrace, 1984 02:02:12,600 --> 02:02:17,200 Speaker 1: convicted felon was This is Chris Collins in a nutshell. 1985 02:02:17,880 --> 02:02:23,400 Speaker 1: He will he speaks some blunt truths. He's self aware 1986 02:02:23,440 --> 02:02:26,000 Speaker 1: and not self aware, sort of all at the same time. 1987 02:02:26,200 --> 02:02:29,920 Speaker 1: Right says the quiet part out loud that the only 1988 02:02:30,040 --> 02:02:31,920 Speaker 1: reason he wants to run if he could just win 1989 02:02:31,960 --> 02:02:35,840 Speaker 1: a term. Then suddenly he's invited to all the local 1990 02:02:35,920 --> 02:02:38,160 Speaker 1: events and he gets to, I guess, sit on the 1991 02:02:38,240 --> 02:02:41,280 Speaker 1: dais rather than I'm sure he could be invited to 1992 02:02:41,320 --> 02:02:45,040 Speaker 1: these events, but he doesn't want to beg to be there, 1993 02:02:45,120 --> 02:02:49,120 Speaker 1: I guess. Anyway, I use this as an example to 1994 02:02:49,200 --> 02:02:51,160 Speaker 1: sort of respond to your question on that, because that 1995 02:02:51,360 --> 02:02:55,560 Speaker 1: is my concern, is that politics is turned into this 1996 02:02:55,720 --> 02:02:58,920 Speaker 1: place where people rehab bad images because we now think 1997 02:02:59,440 --> 02:03:03,520 Speaker 1: politicians are kind of you know that we assume a 1998 02:03:03,600 --> 02:03:06,440 Speaker 1: politician is slimy. You know, you're guilty of being slimy 1999 02:03:06,480 --> 02:03:10,480 Speaker 1: until you prove that you're not. And that's sad, right. 2000 02:03:10,920 --> 02:03:15,680 Speaker 1: I got into this. I went to Washington because, man, 2001 02:03:16,240 --> 02:03:18,120 Speaker 1: I looked up to these people. And it's true, the 2002 02:03:18,200 --> 02:03:20,520 Speaker 1: more you get to know them, the more you realize 2003 02:03:21,640 --> 02:03:23,640 Speaker 1: not all of them are are worth looking up to. 2004 02:03:25,040 --> 02:03:27,440 Speaker 1: But there was a time more of them were. And 2005 02:03:27,520 --> 02:03:29,560 Speaker 1: it's a bummer. We're not there yet. All right, let 2006 02:03:29,560 --> 02:03:31,040 Speaker 1: me do one more question here and I'll do my 2007 02:03:31,240 --> 02:03:33,880 Speaker 1: little college football preview for you. Good evening. Loving the 2008 02:03:33,960 --> 02:03:36,920 Speaker 1: Check podcast find myself anxiously awaiting the next installment every 2009 02:03:36,960 --> 02:03:39,240 Speaker 1: other morning during the week. I appreciate that my question 2010 02:03:40,280 --> 02:03:43,960 Speaker 1: you recently cited congressional carve outs for pay during government shutdowns, 2011 02:03:43,960 --> 02:03:45,800 Speaker 1: such as military pay and solid security. I was listening 2012 02:03:45,840 --> 02:03:48,280 Speaker 1: to someone on Boston Public Radio a few days ago, 2013 02:03:48,320 --> 02:03:51,200 Speaker 1: where you are a frequent guest, discussed military pay would 2014 02:03:51,200 --> 02:03:53,760 Speaker 1: cease during the shutdown, So I'm confused. Thanks for a 2015 02:03:53,840 --> 02:03:56,560 Speaker 1: fantastic source of information critical of both sides of the aisle. 2016 02:03:57,800 --> 02:04:01,240 Speaker 1: The pay is guaranteed. The pay can be delayed, but 2017 02:04:01,360 --> 02:04:05,120 Speaker 1: it's guaranteed. And the military pay is was always guaranteed 2018 02:04:05,160 --> 02:04:07,240 Speaker 1: as a as a carve out, and then they have 2019 02:04:07,400 --> 02:04:10,000 Speaker 1: to a lot of times. Most of the times when 2020 02:04:10,000 --> 02:04:16,400 Speaker 1: they've done these shorts shutdowns, they do pass a bipartisan 2021 02:04:16,440 --> 02:04:18,280 Speaker 1: bill that says, hey, we're gonna go ahead and let 2022 02:04:18,360 --> 02:04:23,040 Speaker 1: military pay happen on time. And that was frequent when 2023 02:04:23,040 --> 02:04:26,480 Speaker 1: we always had some you know, some members of the 2024 02:04:26,520 --> 02:04:29,000 Speaker 1: military in a in a in a hot zone or 2025 02:04:29,040 --> 02:04:33,760 Speaker 1: a war zone, notably for whatever reason, they didn't you 2026 02:04:33,840 --> 02:04:36,560 Speaker 1: know Democrats. In fact, that's one of the ways that 2027 02:04:36,680 --> 02:04:39,600 Speaker 1: Democrats are now trying to go to Mike Johnson back 2028 02:04:39,800 --> 02:04:43,400 Speaker 1: to bringing the House back this this this week, is 2029 02:04:43,480 --> 02:04:46,720 Speaker 1: to just simply vote on that so that there's no 2030 02:04:47,200 --> 02:04:51,200 Speaker 1: interruption in their pay. But there but the carve out. 2031 02:04:51,240 --> 02:04:56,040 Speaker 1: They're guaranteed their pay and in the case of active 2032 02:04:56,120 --> 02:04:58,200 Speaker 1: duty military, you know, they're housing. The don't have to 2033 02:04:58,200 --> 02:05:00,160 Speaker 1: worry about that. So that's why it's it's let that 2034 02:05:00,640 --> 02:05:03,480 Speaker 1: carve out. If they weren't guaranteed their pay, I think 2035 02:05:03,480 --> 02:05:05,800 Speaker 1: you'd have a different situation. So where I may have 2036 02:05:05,920 --> 02:05:10,040 Speaker 1: confused you was I may have indicated that they were 2037 02:05:10,800 --> 02:05:15,000 Speaker 1: they were getting it without interruption, because they always do, 2038 02:05:15,920 --> 02:05:20,320 Speaker 1: but they hadn't. Actually each time they had to individually 2039 02:05:20,440 --> 02:05:23,160 Speaker 1: vote to make sure it was done without an interruption, 2040 02:05:23,320 --> 02:05:26,360 Speaker 1: and they didn't do that for this time, which was unusual. 2041 02:05:26,640 --> 02:05:30,760 Speaker 1: But there is no but the law guarantees that back 2042 02:05:30,840 --> 02:05:32,720 Speaker 1: pay for it's what the law guarantees the back pay 2043 02:05:32,760 --> 02:05:35,320 Speaker 1: now of all federal workers. That was a separate law 2044 02:05:35,360 --> 02:05:38,840 Speaker 1: that was passed in twenty nineteen that Donald Trump signed 2045 02:05:38,840 --> 02:05:41,000 Speaker 1: in the law and now that his current budget director 2046 02:05:41,080 --> 02:05:45,640 Speaker 1: is trying to claim does not abide. But anyway, apologies 2047 02:05:45,680 --> 02:05:50,120 Speaker 1: for confusing you on that, but that that's where that goes, 2048 02:05:50,520 --> 02:05:54,440 Speaker 1: all right. So with that, I am this is my 2049 02:05:54,560 --> 02:05:57,400 Speaker 1: first weekend and four weekends and I'm not traveling to 2050 02:05:57,600 --> 02:06:01,080 Speaker 1: see a football game. I will be honest, as a 2051 02:06:04,320 --> 02:06:08,200 Speaker 1: middling aged man, I am getting exhausted for mayor travel. 2052 02:06:08,320 --> 02:06:12,160 Speaker 1: So maybe I needed a weekend off from traveling to football. 2053 02:06:12,200 --> 02:06:14,760 Speaker 1: But that doesn't mean we don't have a great lineup 2054 02:06:14,800 --> 02:06:20,640 Speaker 1: of games this week. Look the most the one I'm 2055 02:06:20,680 --> 02:06:23,200 Speaker 1: most curious about, and I think the one that will 2056 02:06:23,240 --> 02:06:26,560 Speaker 1: be more determinative to me. You know, there's two big 2057 02:06:26,640 --> 02:06:28,840 Speaker 1: ones this week and they're both in the Big ten. Right, 2058 02:06:28,880 --> 02:06:33,960 Speaker 1: you have Indiana at Oregon. Do you fully believe in Indiana? 2059 02:06:34,200 --> 02:06:36,960 Speaker 1: And how good is Oregon? Right? Do we look at 2060 02:06:37,000 --> 02:06:39,680 Speaker 1: the Penn State loss to UCLA and start to question 2061 02:06:39,840 --> 02:06:44,400 Speaker 1: whether is was that just Penn State flat spot or 2062 02:06:44,480 --> 02:06:47,760 Speaker 1: is Penn State really just not that good without Tyler Warren? Right? 2063 02:06:47,920 --> 02:06:50,240 Speaker 1: And I think we're starting to come to the conclusion 2064 02:06:50,280 --> 02:06:53,600 Speaker 1: that they had a special, special talent in Tyler Warren. 2065 02:06:53,760 --> 02:06:55,360 Speaker 1: How good was he? He's so good He's made the 2066 02:06:55,480 --> 02:06:57,840 Speaker 1: Colts a playoff team right, all on his own. He's 2067 02:06:57,880 --> 02:07:02,440 Speaker 1: made Daniel Jones look like an MVP candidate. So shame 2068 02:07:02,520 --> 02:07:06,200 Speaker 1: on all of us for not realizing how maybe that 2069 02:07:06,400 --> 02:07:08,400 Speaker 1: dude should have been invited to New York at least 2070 02:07:08,440 --> 02:07:10,800 Speaker 1: to be a heusband finalist on that front. And then 2071 02:07:10,840 --> 02:07:13,880 Speaker 1: the other interesting game is Ohio State going to champagne 2072 02:07:14,520 --> 02:07:19,360 Speaker 1: in Illinois? Who is Illinois? Are they the team that 2073 02:07:19,440 --> 02:07:22,240 Speaker 1: beat USC or the team that got their clocks cleaned 2074 02:07:22,280 --> 02:07:27,880 Speaker 1: in Bloomington by Indiana? They're tough at home. Ohio State 2075 02:07:28,080 --> 02:07:31,560 Speaker 1: does appear to be getting better every week. Justin saying, 2076 02:07:32,680 --> 02:07:35,560 Speaker 1: I'm just saying I'm not going to get over that punditry, 2077 02:07:35,680 --> 02:07:38,520 Speaker 1: that that ability to do so many puns with the 2078 02:07:38,880 --> 02:07:43,080 Speaker 1: quarterback of Ohio State. We're all just saying that Justin 2079 02:07:43,200 --> 02:07:48,160 Speaker 1: saying is getting better every week. I'm not, by the way, 2080 02:07:48,280 --> 02:07:50,560 Speaker 1: I'm not somebody who will bet on individual players. I 2081 02:07:51,200 --> 02:07:53,520 Speaker 1: accept the premise that I think player props are very 2082 02:07:53,560 --> 02:07:59,760 Speaker 1: corruptible when it comes to when it comes to gambling, 2083 02:08:00,360 --> 02:08:02,240 Speaker 1: and in fact, in the state of Virginia, they don't 2084 02:08:02,280 --> 02:08:05,840 Speaker 1: even allow you to bet on awards. You can't bet 2085 02:08:05,920 --> 02:08:07,600 Speaker 1: on the Heisman in Virginia. I have to go across 2086 02:08:07,640 --> 02:08:09,120 Speaker 1: the river to DC if I wanted to do that. 2087 02:08:09,920 --> 02:08:12,840 Speaker 1: But if I were taking a long shot Heisman pick 2088 02:08:12,960 --> 02:08:15,640 Speaker 1: right now, Justin saying would be a pretty good bye 2089 02:08:15,760 --> 02:08:18,760 Speaker 1: at this point, because you know the way the Heisman 2090 02:08:18,960 --> 02:08:22,040 Speaker 1: stuff works, it's all recency bias. And as much as 2091 02:08:22,120 --> 02:08:24,480 Speaker 1: I think Reuben Bain and Miami, or Carson Beck and 2092 02:08:24,560 --> 02:08:30,320 Speaker 1: Miami both deserve consideration, their most high profile games are 2093 02:08:30,360 --> 02:08:34,760 Speaker 1: now over and Ohio State has a lot more high 2094 02:08:34,800 --> 02:08:38,080 Speaker 1: profile games to come, and of course that you know 2095 02:08:38,200 --> 02:08:40,720 Speaker 1: the whole recency bias, right, He's going to be having 2096 02:08:40,760 --> 02:08:42,960 Speaker 1: that Michigan game, you know, not very far from the 2097 02:08:43,320 --> 02:08:46,720 Speaker 1: voting itself. Perhaps Ohio State Oregon in the Big Ten 2098 02:08:46,840 --> 02:08:52,440 Speaker 1: Conference final itself is another stage for him. Anyway, It's 2099 02:08:52,720 --> 02:08:56,120 Speaker 1: it's interesting how good is he? How good is Illinois 2100 02:08:56,160 --> 02:08:59,680 Speaker 1: at slowing this game down in order to give themselves 2101 02:08:59,720 --> 02:09:02,280 Speaker 1: a check. They can't afford to trade scores with Ohio State, 2102 02:09:02,400 --> 02:09:05,760 Speaker 1: So I'm intrigued by that game. I don't know if 2103 02:09:05,760 --> 02:09:09,480 Speaker 1: I buy into Illinois, And in fact, their victory over 2104 02:09:09,600 --> 02:09:12,480 Speaker 1: USC makes me doubt USC more than it does make 2105 02:09:12,560 --> 02:09:17,600 Speaker 1: me more confident in Illinois. And then there's Indiana in 2106 02:09:17,720 --> 02:09:21,560 Speaker 1: Oregon right the other game, So it all depends on 2107 02:09:21,640 --> 02:09:23,600 Speaker 1: how much of a juggernaut you think Illinois. I think 2108 02:09:23,600 --> 02:09:25,400 Speaker 1: it's clear Indiana is better this year than they were 2109 02:09:25,480 --> 02:09:29,760 Speaker 1: last year. But does that mean they're they're they're a 2110 02:09:29,880 --> 02:09:33,040 Speaker 1: contender for the whole thing or not? If they can 2111 02:09:33,440 --> 02:09:35,400 Speaker 1: put up a once, you know, even lose just by 2112 02:09:35,400 --> 02:09:37,440 Speaker 1: one score in Eugene, I think it's fair to say, 2113 02:09:37,840 --> 02:09:40,160 Speaker 1: because that is one tough place to play, I think 2114 02:09:40,200 --> 02:09:44,240 Speaker 1: it's fair to say they are contenders. I can't believe 2115 02:09:44,280 --> 02:09:46,640 Speaker 1: I'm not that. The first game out of my mouth 2116 02:09:46,760 --> 02:09:51,080 Speaker 1: isn't about Texas Oklahoma. Here we have the Red River shootout, rivalry, 2117 02:09:51,120 --> 02:09:56,160 Speaker 1: whatever we're supposed to call it. Now, it does feel 2118 02:09:56,200 --> 02:10:00,720 Speaker 1: as if this is a This is become a very 2119 02:10:00,800 --> 02:10:06,320 Speaker 1: important game for Arch Manning's reputation, fairly or unfairly. I 2120 02:10:06,440 --> 02:10:10,560 Speaker 1: do think it's worth reminding people that Arch's grandfather, Archie, 2121 02:10:11,000 --> 02:10:13,120 Speaker 1: was the first one to say he's not turning pro 2122 02:10:13,280 --> 02:10:16,880 Speaker 1: in twenty six. Perhaps he knew his grandson needed more 2123 02:10:16,960 --> 02:10:20,040 Speaker 1: time to sort of in the football factory to get better. 2124 02:10:22,520 --> 02:10:25,200 Speaker 1: Look the hype machine. It's not as if the Manning 2125 02:10:25,240 --> 02:10:27,720 Speaker 1: family didn't contribute to the hype machine. And you know, 2126 02:10:27,880 --> 02:10:30,280 Speaker 1: it is what it is. Sometimes you can't do anything 2127 02:10:30,320 --> 02:10:33,760 Speaker 1: about it. You know, if he were Arch Smith, he 2128 02:10:33,800 --> 02:10:36,160 Speaker 1: wouldn't be He wouldn't have gotten the same amount of hype, 2129 02:10:36,200 --> 02:10:38,520 Speaker 1: nor would he be getting the same amount of criticism. 2130 02:10:44,200 --> 02:10:47,520 Speaker 1: But the real question is whether John Matteer, Oklahoma starting quarterback, 2131 02:10:47,640 --> 02:10:49,840 Speaker 1: is really going to try to play here in this game. 2132 02:10:50,160 --> 02:10:54,880 Speaker 1: Except look, Oklahoma are are they legit contenders for the 2133 02:10:54,960 --> 02:10:58,600 Speaker 1: whole thing? They beat Texas without matir as a as 2134 02:10:58,640 --> 02:11:02,280 Speaker 1: a relevant force. That's a big deal and that shouldn't 2135 02:11:02,280 --> 02:11:06,520 Speaker 1: be ignored. So that's probably the third most interesting game 2136 02:11:07,560 --> 02:11:10,800 Speaker 1: for me on the docket. Then After that, everything else 2137 02:11:10,960 --> 02:11:14,400 Speaker 1: is only interesting depending on how much money you plan 2138 02:11:14,480 --> 02:11:16,880 Speaker 1: on putting down there. I mean, Georgia Auburn, I think 2139 02:11:16,920 --> 02:11:19,360 Speaker 1: we thought that would be a big deal game. I 2140 02:11:19,600 --> 02:11:24,360 Speaker 1: assume Georgia wins that with a little bit of put 2141 02:11:24,400 --> 02:11:28,160 Speaker 1: it this way, I I will be surprised if that's 2142 02:11:28,200 --> 02:11:30,320 Speaker 1: a if that's a close game in the fourth quarter, 2143 02:11:30,440 --> 02:11:33,840 Speaker 1: and if it is, then maybe Georgia isn't a top 2144 02:11:33,920 --> 02:11:35,960 Speaker 1: ten team this year. And by the way, no shame 2145 02:11:36,040 --> 02:11:38,560 Speaker 1: in that. My goodness, look at how many people they've 2146 02:11:38,640 --> 02:11:41,280 Speaker 1: sent to the pros. At some point. I'm not saying 2147 02:11:41,280 --> 02:11:44,200 Speaker 1: the cupboard is empty, but their depth at some point 2148 02:11:44,400 --> 02:11:46,680 Speaker 1: is going to catch up with them. And in this environment, 2149 02:11:46,720 --> 02:11:48,800 Speaker 1: you don't get to stockball talent the way you used 2150 02:11:48,800 --> 02:11:52,280 Speaker 1: to be able to stockpilot. So that's a little bit 2151 02:11:52,320 --> 02:11:54,600 Speaker 1: of a we'll learn a little something there, depending on 2152 02:11:54,680 --> 02:11:59,720 Speaker 1: the on the spread of that game and if baseball's 2153 02:11:59,720 --> 02:12:02,800 Speaker 1: not doing it for you. That Friday night South Florida 2154 02:12:02,880 --> 02:12:05,960 Speaker 1: North Texas game, it's a big deal to South Florida 2155 02:12:05,960 --> 02:12:09,040 Speaker 1: if they want to be the group of five representative 2156 02:12:09,080 --> 02:12:11,040 Speaker 1: in the playoff. I think it's gonna be a great game. 2157 02:12:11,040 --> 02:12:13,160 Speaker 1: They're going on the road they got to win that game. 2158 02:12:14,320 --> 02:12:17,760 Speaker 1: And as a Floridian and as a team that the 2159 02:12:17,880 --> 02:12:21,160 Speaker 1: Hurricanes have defeated, I want to see everybody that Miami 2160 02:12:21,200 --> 02:12:24,720 Speaker 1: beat do well. So let's go Bulls. Let's go see 2161 02:12:24,760 --> 02:12:27,200 Speaker 1: if you can go to the other big game in 2162 02:12:27,960 --> 02:12:32,120 Speaker 1: North Texas this weekend and give them a good preview. 2163 02:12:32,280 --> 02:12:35,000 Speaker 1: Should be an entertaining game. If you're just looking for 2164 02:12:35,080 --> 02:12:38,440 Speaker 1: some entertaining football, North Texas and South Florida is one 2165 02:12:38,680 --> 02:12:40,920 Speaker 1: that will be worthy of your time. All right, With that, 2166 02:12:41,280 --> 02:12:44,200 Speaker 1: I have a relaxing weekend as my Hurricanes have another bye. 2167 02:12:44,200 --> 02:12:46,120 Speaker 1: We've get a bye week before Florida State bye. I 2168 02:12:46,160 --> 02:12:50,120 Speaker 1: have to tell you the scheduling this year for Miami 2169 02:12:50,200 --> 02:12:53,360 Speaker 1: has been fantastic, which means, let's not screw this season up. 2170 02:12:53,760 --> 02:12:55,840 Speaker 1: We are not going to have where we get a 2171 02:12:55,880 --> 02:12:58,160 Speaker 1: buye before Florida State and then a bye to recover 2172 02:12:58,640 --> 02:13:01,240 Speaker 1: from Florida State before going into this Friday night game 2173 02:13:01,600 --> 02:13:05,040 Speaker 1: that we have coming up next week with the always 2174 02:13:05,160 --> 02:13:10,400 Speaker 1: dangerous Louisville Cardinals. So with that, I'll see in about 2175 02:13:10,600 --> 02:13:14,600 Speaker 1: ninety six hours enjoy what is this is? Right now? 2176 02:13:14,680 --> 02:13:20,400 Speaker 1: We are at peak sports fandom. They're all coming together NHL, 2177 02:13:21,000 --> 02:13:27,600 Speaker 1: NBA regular seasons begin, baseball playoffs, college football, NFL. It 2178 02:13:27,840 --> 02:13:31,760 Speaker 1: is a smorgasboard, so enjoy it while it's here. Enjoy 2179 02:13:31,880 --> 02:13:34,960 Speaker 1: this October weekend, and with that I'll see in my 2180 02:13:35,040 --> 02:13:35,200 Speaker 1: name