WEBVTT - Defense Tech in Focus As Iran Conflict Widens

0:00:02.520 --> 0:00:13.800
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Audio Studios, podcasts, radio news. Bloomberg Tech is alive

0:00:13.880 --> 0:00:17.720
<v Speaker 1>from coast to coast with Caroline Hyde in New York

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:19.919
<v Speaker 1>and Vla Loow in sentences go.

0:00:22.440 --> 0:00:24.799
<v Speaker 2>This is Bloomberg Tech. I'm Caroline Hyde in New York

0:00:25.120 --> 0:00:27.319
<v Speaker 2>and let's go straight to our top story today, the

0:00:27.360 --> 0:00:30.960
<v Speaker 2>war with Iran. The conflict continues to reverberate across the

0:00:31.040 --> 0:00:33.800
<v Speaker 2>Middle East. Today. This is President Trump says the bombing

0:00:33.840 --> 0:00:37.360
<v Speaker 2>campaign against Iran could last for weeks. We are awaiting

0:00:37.479 --> 0:00:40.040
<v Speaker 2>more updates from the President this hour, but we want

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:42.440
<v Speaker 2>to bring you the latest of Bloomberg's Danie Williams, who

0:00:42.520 --> 0:00:45.720
<v Speaker 2>is in Jerusalem on the ground there in Israel. Dan,

0:00:45.760 --> 0:00:46.280
<v Speaker 2>what is it like?

0:00:47.840 --> 0:00:49.519
<v Speaker 3>Well, as you can see, the sun is set on

0:00:49.600 --> 0:00:51.960
<v Speaker 3>what has been the third day of this extraordinary war,

0:00:52.040 --> 0:00:55.360
<v Speaker 3>war that appears to be widening, engulfing not just some

0:00:55.480 --> 0:00:59.000
<v Speaker 3>at least now, but even lapping up against Southern Europe,

0:00:59.000 --> 0:01:02.480
<v Speaker 3>with Cyprus saying that a British air base on its

0:01:02.520 --> 0:01:06.840
<v Speaker 3>soil was apparently targeted by a Hesbala drone. Hesbola being

0:01:06.880 --> 0:01:11.240
<v Speaker 3>the Lebanese militia ally of Iran, in fact, an ally

0:01:11.240 --> 0:01:14.560
<v Speaker 3>of Iran in Lebanon, which opened a front from Lebanon

0:01:14.680 --> 0:01:18.120
<v Speaker 3>with Israel reopened that front overnight, and now these really

0:01:18.160 --> 0:01:21.560
<v Speaker 3>are saying they're bombing targets in Lebanon a pace as

0:01:21.600 --> 0:01:26.640
<v Speaker 3>they continue their bombing of Iran alongside US forces. So

0:01:26.760 --> 0:01:29.680
<v Speaker 3>we have several fronts opening up, a number of Gulf

0:01:29.760 --> 0:01:32.880
<v Speaker 3>Arab countries that also have found themselves in the firing

0:01:32.920 --> 0:01:36.520
<v Speaker 3>line being struck by Iranian missiles and drones, and not

0:01:36.680 --> 0:01:40.880
<v Speaker 3>just US bases on their turf, but also hotels and

0:01:40.920 --> 0:01:44.080
<v Speaker 3>the like. This is imposing a good deal of economic

0:01:44.120 --> 0:01:47.039
<v Speaker 3>pain on the region, and it would appear that what

0:01:47.120 --> 0:01:49.320
<v Speaker 3>the Iranian regime is trying to do, even though it's

0:01:49.400 --> 0:01:54.200
<v Speaker 3>massively outgunned by its enemies, is to wait out this

0:01:54.320 --> 0:01:57.680
<v Speaker 3>campaign in the hope that the pain and indeed the

0:01:57.720 --> 0:02:01.840
<v Speaker 3>patience of the American public that apparently disapproves of this

0:02:02.280 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 3>by quite a margin already will wear thin and some

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:08.400
<v Speaker 3>members of the Ranian regime might be able to survive.

0:02:09.160 --> 0:02:13.200
<v Speaker 2>Talk to us about what remains of the Iranian regime, Dan, it's.

0:02:13.160 --> 0:02:16.160
<v Speaker 3>Very hard to know. It's the supreme leader was killed

0:02:16.200 --> 0:02:19.200
<v Speaker 3>over the weekend in one of those opening salvos, and

0:02:19.280 --> 0:02:23.000
<v Speaker 3>almost by the minute we've received updates about other members

0:02:23.240 --> 0:02:26.359
<v Speaker 3>who have been killed, sometimes as successors of those who

0:02:26.360 --> 0:02:30.040
<v Speaker 3>were recently killed. However, to judge by the cycle of

0:02:30.160 --> 0:02:33.720
<v Speaker 3>fire being maintained by Iran, certainly in Israel, what we've

0:02:33.720 --> 0:02:38.760
<v Speaker 3>been experiencing every half hour a couple hours, sirens and

0:02:38.840 --> 0:02:42.320
<v Speaker 3>calls to take shelter in the face of missiles or

0:02:42.440 --> 0:02:45.200
<v Speaker 3>drones coming in, it would appear that there is still

0:02:45.200 --> 0:02:48.880
<v Speaker 3>a vestigious state functioning, managing to keep up the fight

0:02:49.240 --> 0:02:53.480
<v Speaker 3>and presumably domestically managing to deter members of the opposition

0:02:53.560 --> 0:02:56.560
<v Speaker 3>from trying to take control of the country. That is,

0:02:56.600 --> 0:03:01.040
<v Speaker 3>of course the vision enunciated both by Israel and the

0:03:01.120 --> 0:03:04.800
<v Speaker 3>United States at the outset a situation whereby the Iranian

0:03:04.880 --> 0:03:09.040
<v Speaker 3>regime is sufficiently degraded s officially destroyed to enable the

0:03:09.160 --> 0:03:12.120
<v Speaker 3>Ranian opposition, which many in the West would see as

0:03:12.160 --> 0:03:15.360
<v Speaker 3>the bulk of the Iranian population, certainly the young population

0:03:15.800 --> 0:03:17.799
<v Speaker 3>to take to the streets again as it did only

0:03:17.840 --> 0:03:20.400
<v Speaker 3>a few weeks ago, but this time not facing the

0:03:20.400 --> 0:03:23.400
<v Speaker 3>guns of the state and being able to assume control.

0:03:23.840 --> 0:03:26.240
<v Speaker 2>Extraordinary day in Jerusalem, as you say, a third day,

0:03:26.280 --> 0:03:29.359
<v Speaker 2>Dan Williams, we so appreciate you being with us of Bloomberg.

0:03:29.480 --> 0:03:32.160
<v Speaker 2>Now let's check out what is a human story that

0:03:32.240 --> 0:03:34.680
<v Speaker 2>is affecting markets right now, andw's that one hundred off

0:03:34.680 --> 0:03:37.240
<v Speaker 2>by four tenths seven percent. Big tech is seeing some

0:03:37.240 --> 0:03:39.840
<v Speaker 2>significant moves on individual names. Of course, money moving into

0:03:39.840 --> 0:03:42.320
<v Speaker 2>the likes of Nvidia, palant here as you're seeing up

0:03:42.360 --> 0:03:46.080
<v Speaker 2>six percent as a defense related name from the tech

0:03:46.120 --> 0:03:49.000
<v Speaker 2>perspective pushes high. These are your big points contributors on

0:03:49.040 --> 0:03:51.120
<v Speaker 2>the day and in video in fact making a deal

0:03:51.200 --> 0:03:53.400
<v Speaker 2>putting money into optical companies. We'll dig into that a

0:03:53.440 --> 0:03:56.360
<v Speaker 2>little bit later, but really we're also seeing significant moves

0:03:56.360 --> 0:04:00.600
<v Speaker 2>in other parts of the market, different industry groups, different classes.

0:04:00.640 --> 0:04:04.600
<v Speaker 2>Brent crude unsurprisingly up more than seven percent, extraordinary moves

0:04:04.600 --> 0:04:07.800
<v Speaker 2>as we consider the straight ofform moves an issue about

0:04:08.000 --> 0:04:11.360
<v Speaker 2>supply chains written large for the globe to try and digest.

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:13.800
<v Speaker 2>Bitcoin is up by more than five percent, with covering

0:04:13.840 --> 0:04:15.320
<v Speaker 2>some of its losses as it was one of the

0:04:15.320 --> 0:04:17.839
<v Speaker 2>main tradable assets over the course of the weekend, and

0:04:17.960 --> 0:04:21.040
<v Speaker 2>strategy if micro Strategy is currently up six point eight

0:04:21.040 --> 0:04:23.440
<v Speaker 2>percent on the back of that Bitcoin buying. Let's talk

0:04:23.440 --> 0:04:27.039
<v Speaker 2>about the market impact more with epec Oscar Deesco, Swiss

0:04:27.080 --> 0:04:30.760
<v Speaker 2>quote senior market analyst, and this is a moment of

0:04:30.920 --> 0:04:34.680
<v Speaker 2>knee jerk reaction of risk of sentiment. But interestingly, we

0:04:34.760 --> 0:04:37.480
<v Speaker 2>are still seeing big tech managing to see some flows

0:04:37.480 --> 0:04:37.840
<v Speaker 2>into it.

0:04:39.080 --> 0:04:41.640
<v Speaker 4>Exactly what we see right now is that as the

0:04:42.080 --> 0:04:45.640
<v Speaker 4>spike in oil prices is being retraced, technology companies are

0:04:45.640 --> 0:04:48.719
<v Speaker 4>also finding some breathing room right now. And we also

0:04:48.800 --> 0:04:52.479
<v Speaker 4>do see some individual divergences in the technologists phase. The

0:04:52.520 --> 0:04:56.600
<v Speaker 4>companies that do have exposure greater exposures to energy costs,

0:04:56.720 --> 0:05:00.400
<v Speaker 4>like the ones that run data centers, are being more

0:05:00.440 --> 0:05:03.960
<v Speaker 4>heavily than the others that are more or less capital intensive,

0:05:04.040 --> 0:05:07.440
<v Speaker 4>like Nvidia for example. The defense related names are also

0:05:07.800 --> 0:05:11.520
<v Speaker 4>gaining on the back of the Middle East conflict news.

0:05:12.160 --> 0:05:16.240
<v Speaker 2>Is that an automatic buying that you think we'll see

0:05:16.320 --> 0:05:19.040
<v Speaker 2>the likes of Palenteer hold on to gains going forward.

0:05:19.480 --> 0:05:22.920
<v Speaker 2>Is there something that is sticky about this demand for

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:23.920
<v Speaker 2>such defense tech.

0:05:25.080 --> 0:05:28.240
<v Speaker 4>Yes, we believe that globally the defense stocks have been

0:05:28.400 --> 0:05:32.279
<v Speaker 4>in demand due to the rapid shifts and the significant

0:05:32.320 --> 0:05:35.680
<v Speaker 4>shift in global geopolitics. And we have seen a couple

0:05:35.760 --> 0:05:39.480
<v Speaker 4>of times since last year that the geopolitical tensions are

0:05:39.520 --> 0:05:43.359
<v Speaker 4>not ready to ease from the actual levels. So the

0:05:43.480 --> 0:05:47.120
<v Speaker 4>risks are being quite high, and the technology companies are

0:05:47.480 --> 0:05:50.520
<v Speaker 4>in technology and defense companies are benefiting grande from it.

0:05:50.520 --> 0:05:52.920
<v Speaker 4>It's not only in the US, but we also think

0:05:52.960 --> 0:05:56.080
<v Speaker 4>that the defense stocks in Europe will also be will

0:05:56.080 --> 0:06:00.400
<v Speaker 4>also continue to benefit from the rising geopolitical tensions restling

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:01.080
<v Speaker 4>across the globe.

0:06:01.120 --> 0:06:03.479
<v Speaker 2>I mean, what's notable as benchmarks are actually trying to

0:06:03.520 --> 0:06:05.560
<v Speaker 2>turn around I'm looking at then that's that more broadly

0:06:05.560 --> 0:06:07.080
<v Speaker 2>only off by about a tenth of a percent now

0:06:07.120 --> 0:06:09.559
<v Speaker 2>the SMP and the US currently off by three ten percent,

0:06:09.600 --> 0:06:12.839
<v Speaker 2>even though we see market falls over in Asia and

0:06:12.880 --> 0:06:17.360
<v Speaker 2>European trading, epect just the macro picture for someone who

0:06:17.400 --> 0:06:20.280
<v Speaker 2>is in the audience right now trying to understand where

0:06:20.440 --> 0:06:25.640
<v Speaker 2>to be navigating if they're exposed to technology names well exactly.

0:06:25.680 --> 0:06:28.000
<v Speaker 4>I mean, what the big picture of today was the

0:06:28.080 --> 0:06:30.520
<v Speaker 4>rapids wise that we saw in energy prices at the

0:06:30.520 --> 0:06:33.520
<v Speaker 4>beginning of today's session, so the Asian and European stocks

0:06:33.520 --> 0:06:36.159
<v Speaker 4>were heavily hit. But as we move on towards the

0:06:36.360 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 4>US session, we see that these gains have been retraced.

0:06:39.400 --> 0:06:42.719
<v Speaker 4>So some of the hotys expectations regarding the major central

0:06:42.760 --> 0:06:44.880
<v Speaker 4>banks that would be lifted.

0:06:45.000 --> 0:06:47.080
<v Speaker 2>That would be that that was.

0:06:47.080 --> 0:06:49.479
<v Speaker 4>Coming actually from the fact that the energy.

0:06:49.160 --> 0:06:50.000
<v Speaker 2>Prices would lift.

0:06:50.080 --> 0:06:54.200
<v Speaker 4>Inflation expectations are also being trimmed right now as oil

0:06:54.279 --> 0:06:57.120
<v Speaker 4>prices are coming back down, and I think that that

0:06:57.360 --> 0:07:01.760
<v Speaker 4>is the global macroeconomic picture that investors should understand. It

0:07:01.839 --> 0:07:05.720
<v Speaker 4>is really today about the energy prices, the inflation expectations,

0:07:05.720 --> 0:07:09.040
<v Speaker 4>and the impact on central bank decisions. As energy prices

0:07:09.080 --> 0:07:12.240
<v Speaker 4>move lower, we are getting back to the levels of

0:07:13.080 --> 0:07:15.640
<v Speaker 4>risk that we saw in the beginning of the session.

0:07:15.720 --> 0:07:18.720
<v Speaker 4>Now we are still higher in terms of energy prices

0:07:18.760 --> 0:07:22.280
<v Speaker 4>and the risk of another upside potential move and sustain

0:07:22.720 --> 0:07:25.960
<v Speaker 4>again in energy prices due persist. But at the moment

0:07:26.000 --> 0:07:29.520
<v Speaker 4>it's quite interesting to see how fast the early gains

0:07:29.560 --> 0:07:34.000
<v Speaker 4>are being retraced and the global markets are immediately readjusting

0:07:34.040 --> 0:07:35.520
<v Speaker 4>to that retracement.

0:07:36.720 --> 0:07:39.560
<v Speaker 2>What is bitcoin acting as in this moment.

0:07:40.480 --> 0:07:44.600
<v Speaker 4>Well, it's interesting because bitcoin has not necessarily been as

0:07:45.320 --> 0:07:48.880
<v Speaker 4>risk haven or a safe haven asset over the past

0:07:48.960 --> 0:07:51.960
<v Speaker 4>few weeks. It was very much in line trend, very

0:07:52.000 --> 0:07:55.880
<v Speaker 4>much in line with technology companies and was hit along

0:07:55.920 --> 0:07:59.239
<v Speaker 4>with the cell off that we saw across the technology space.

0:07:59.240 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 4>So what we see to is that the bitcoin is

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:05.240
<v Speaker 4>actually acting as a safe haven asset, and we suspect

0:08:05.360 --> 0:08:10.200
<v Speaker 4>that the regional conflict could eventually bring some capital into

0:08:10.520 --> 0:08:16.720
<v Speaker 4>bitcoin regarding maybe the detentions or or the fact out

0:08:16.880 --> 0:08:19.760
<v Speaker 4>the gold has been overly valued and investors may be

0:08:19.960 --> 0:08:22.760
<v Speaker 4>looking for other safe haven. But to be perfectly honest

0:08:22.800 --> 0:08:25.240
<v Speaker 4>with you, the move that we see in bitcoin and

0:08:25.280 --> 0:08:28.680
<v Speaker 4>the coupling of the correlation with the technologists is quite

0:08:28.760 --> 0:08:32.199
<v Speaker 4>interesting right now, even more so as the higher energy

0:08:32.320 --> 0:08:36.800
<v Speaker 4>energy prices should normally also have negative impact on bitcoin impact.

0:08:37.000 --> 0:08:39.320
<v Speaker 2>It's great to catch up with you. Thank you very much. Indeed,

0:08:39.320 --> 0:08:41.640
<v Speaker 2>I thank you ipec's go desh guys with us on

0:08:41.720 --> 0:08:44.000
<v Speaker 2>Swiss quote. We appreciate it. Mean while coming up, we'll

0:08:44.000 --> 0:08:48.440
<v Speaker 2>speak with representatives Samncardo, a congressman from Silicon Valley about

0:08:48.440 --> 0:08:52.040
<v Speaker 2>the conflict in the Middle East and AI policy. Meanwhile,

0:08:52.320 --> 0:08:54.920
<v Speaker 2>check out shares of Apple. There is other news happening

0:08:54.920 --> 0:08:57.520
<v Speaker 2>amid of course the concerns in the Middle East. We're

0:08:57.600 --> 0:08:59.800
<v Speaker 2>up almost two tens of percent as Apple is unvailing

0:08:59.800 --> 0:09:02.760
<v Speaker 2>the iPhone seventeen E. It's the latest version of its

0:09:02.800 --> 0:09:06.280
<v Speaker 2>lower end smartphone, faster version of an iPad Air also

0:09:06.320 --> 0:09:10.040
<v Speaker 2>coming out with the iPhone seventeen e, including a faster processor,

0:09:10.320 --> 0:09:26.760
<v Speaker 2>new in house wireless chips. This is Bloomberg Tech. We

0:09:26.840 --> 0:09:29.720
<v Speaker 2>are awaiting remarks from President Trump in Washington, who is

0:09:29.720 --> 0:09:33.240
<v Speaker 2>about to participate in a public event, and we anticipate

0:09:33.280 --> 0:09:36.760
<v Speaker 2>there might be some commentary regarding the war with Iran.

0:09:37.160 --> 0:09:39.640
<v Speaker 2>We will be bringing you up to the moment breaking

0:09:39.679 --> 0:09:42.400
<v Speaker 2>news on that subject, but within the context of Middle

0:09:42.400 --> 0:09:45.320
<v Speaker 2>East Anthropic it has been saying that there's been an

0:09:45.320 --> 0:09:48.400
<v Speaker 2>outage that impacted thousands of Claud users, but it has

0:09:48.440 --> 0:09:51.120
<v Speaker 2>now been resolved. Reports of the issues with the chatbot

0:09:51.160 --> 0:09:54.480
<v Speaker 2>came is the AI provider experiences a surge in demand

0:09:54.840 --> 0:09:57.280
<v Speaker 2>driven by the company's feud with the Pentagon and for

0:09:57.360 --> 0:09:59.760
<v Speaker 2>the potential use of its technology for mass surveillance in

0:09:59.800 --> 0:10:02.880
<v Speaker 2>the development of autonomous weaponry. Now, Seth Figman, a Bloomberg

0:10:02.920 --> 0:10:04.680
<v Speaker 2>News and place to say, joins us to set the

0:10:04.679 --> 0:10:08.720
<v Speaker 2>context first, because while a feud is erupted between Anthropic,

0:10:09.080 --> 0:10:13.280
<v Speaker 2>we've actually seen Open Ai complete a contract with the

0:10:13.320 --> 0:10:15.880
<v Speaker 2>Pentagon in the use of its own AI technology. Just

0:10:15.880 --> 0:10:17.080
<v Speaker 2>take us through the weekend, Seth.

0:10:17.360 --> 0:10:19.319
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think this has to be the most dramatic

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:22.520
<v Speaker 5>weekend we've seen AI lands since the ouster Sam Altman

0:10:22.600 --> 0:10:26.960
<v Speaker 5>a couple of years ago. But to your point, Carolyn, Yes,

0:10:27.360 --> 0:10:32.520
<v Speaker 5>Openingey swooped in hours after Anthropic was effectively blacklisted by

0:10:32.559 --> 0:10:35.439
<v Speaker 5>the Defense Department and segaing to deal with the Defense

0:10:35.520 --> 0:10:39.040
<v Speaker 5>Department for classified AI work. Now, opening I is not

0:10:39.160 --> 0:10:42.360
<v Speaker 5>saying if this replaces Anthropics were, but they are signaling

0:10:42.440 --> 0:10:46.439
<v Speaker 5>that they are comfortable with the contractual safeguards to make

0:10:46.440 --> 0:10:50.040
<v Speaker 5>sure that their technology is not used for domestic surveillance

0:10:50.200 --> 0:10:52.880
<v Speaker 5>or for autonomous weaponry, which were the two red lines

0:10:53.240 --> 0:10:55.679
<v Speaker 5>that Anthropic really centered on and which led to this

0:10:55.960 --> 0:10:57.840
<v Speaker 5>fierce standoff with the Pentagon.

0:10:58.679 --> 0:11:02.480
<v Speaker 2>It's been a standoff that has erupted online, with many

0:11:02.840 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 2>people calling to stop using chat GBT to instead shift

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:10.280
<v Speaker 2>one's attention to Anthropics consumer apps. Now, it might be

0:11:10.280 --> 0:11:13.120
<v Speaker 2>said that Claude for Enterprise hasn't been affected by the

0:11:13.200 --> 0:11:16.760
<v Speaker 2>outages today. It's interesting that Treasury Secretary Scott Bessen has

0:11:16.800 --> 0:11:19.800
<v Speaker 2>been saying that he's following President Trump's direction on Anthropic

0:11:19.880 --> 0:11:22.679
<v Speaker 2>and in the Treasury Department is terminating all use of

0:11:22.720 --> 0:11:25.880
<v Speaker 2>Anthropic products. But there's reporting to show that it's of

0:11:25.920 --> 0:11:27.839
<v Speaker 2>course still being used at the moment and was over

0:11:27.880 --> 0:11:29.120
<v Speaker 2>the course of the weekend with Iran.

0:11:30.160 --> 0:11:31.960
<v Speaker 5>Yeah, I think to step back, let's just say that

0:11:32.040 --> 0:11:34.839
<v Speaker 5>what seems clear is that the federal government is moving

0:11:34.840 --> 0:11:39.199
<v Speaker 5>forward with rethinking its use of CLAUD. What's less clear

0:11:39.840 --> 0:11:42.079
<v Speaker 5>is what the broader impact than blasphe igus will be

0:11:42.160 --> 0:11:46.280
<v Speaker 5>unanthropic from the many other businesses and companies that work

0:11:46.400 --> 0:11:51.400
<v Speaker 5>with the government. To take headsets tweet literally, he's implying

0:11:51.440 --> 0:11:55.040
<v Speaker 5>that any business that does commercial business with Anthropic must

0:11:55.120 --> 0:11:57.920
<v Speaker 5>stop that if they also work with the military. But

0:11:58.320 --> 0:12:01.240
<v Speaker 5>Dario Miday, at the CEO of Anthropics there over the weekend,

0:12:01.400 --> 0:12:03.760
<v Speaker 5>he thinks it's much more limited in scope. It'll just

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:06.240
<v Speaker 5>be if they do military work with the anthropics. So

0:12:06.280 --> 0:12:07.760
<v Speaker 5>that remains to be seeing how it's interpreted.

0:12:08.000 --> 0:12:09.559
<v Speaker 2>Still a lot of work to be done by the

0:12:09.679 --> 0:12:13.280
<v Speaker 2>likes of Palenteer, for example, Bloomberg Seth Fiegeman across this story.

0:12:13.320 --> 0:12:16.120
<v Speaker 2>Thank you very much. Indeed, now look US lawmakers, they're

0:12:16.160 --> 0:12:19.360
<v Speaker 2>gearing up for a vote on a war powers resolution

0:12:19.559 --> 0:12:22.200
<v Speaker 2>following the strikes in Iran. This is unfolding as the

0:12:22.240 --> 0:12:26.000
<v Speaker 2>debate over AI used by the military continues. We're poased

0:12:26.040 --> 0:12:28.920
<v Speaker 2>to say we're joined by representatives Sam Nacardo his district

0:12:29.120 --> 0:12:33.040
<v Speaker 2>includes parts of Silicon Valley. There is drama in Washington,

0:12:33.080 --> 0:12:35.160
<v Speaker 2>where you've just got the train to us from. There

0:12:35.200 --> 0:12:38.360
<v Speaker 2>is drama in where you represent as well. Can I

0:12:38.440 --> 0:12:41.319
<v Speaker 2>just ask you, first and foremost, what do you think

0:12:41.360 --> 0:12:43.920
<v Speaker 2>the relationship of some of the companies that within your

0:12:43.960 --> 0:12:48.120
<v Speaker 2>district is evolving with the Pentagon? How do you observe

0:12:48.280 --> 0:12:49.680
<v Speaker 2>what occurred over the last few days.

0:12:50.120 --> 0:12:52.920
<v Speaker 6>I think Silica on Vallet, there's a strong libertarian streak,

0:12:53.160 --> 0:12:55.600
<v Speaker 6>and so there are many who are cheering to see

0:12:55.640 --> 0:12:59.360
<v Speaker 6>Anthropics step up as it had. And look, there's a

0:12:59.480 --> 0:13:03.120
<v Speaker 6>free market here in the Defense Department has many competitors

0:13:03.120 --> 0:13:05.160
<v Speaker 6>to choose from, and it has a right to choose

0:13:05.200 --> 0:13:08.480
<v Speaker 6>whoever it wants. But it seems to me that at

0:13:08.480 --> 0:13:10.880
<v Speaker 6>the end of the day, when we're talking about AI safeguards,

0:13:10.920 --> 0:13:14.800
<v Speaker 6>these ought to be decisions that are not confined to

0:13:15.240 --> 0:13:20.600
<v Speaker 6>back room negotiations between lawyers at the Pentagon and individual companies.

0:13:20.640 --> 0:13:24.080
<v Speaker 6>These ought to be very public discussions. The administration should

0:13:24.080 --> 0:13:27.320
<v Speaker 6>be setting rules, Congress should be setting rules. And the

0:13:27.360 --> 0:13:30.520
<v Speaker 6>way this all went down now with retribution against Anthropic

0:13:30.600 --> 0:13:33.920
<v Speaker 6>in the way that Secret Heseth and others have articulated,

0:13:34.120 --> 0:13:37.280
<v Speaker 6>I think is very damaging to Silicon Valley and frankly

0:13:37.320 --> 0:13:37.960
<v Speaker 6>to the country.

0:13:38.120 --> 0:13:40.960
<v Speaker 2>In many ways, Anthropic and Daria Amide have tried to

0:13:40.960 --> 0:13:43.480
<v Speaker 2>make it a public discussion, brought it into the light.

0:13:43.880 --> 0:13:47.240
<v Speaker 2>What's interesting is Dario has also said that the law

0:13:47.280 --> 0:13:50.880
<v Speaker 2>has not yet caught up with AI's ability. Therein lies

0:13:50.960 --> 0:13:54.440
<v Speaker 2>your role in Congress. How can Congress keep up at

0:13:54.440 --> 0:13:58.200
<v Speaker 2>this moment to ensure that there aren't these blurred red

0:13:58.240 --> 0:14:01.000
<v Speaker 2>lines that everyone's trying to digest from open AI's contract

0:14:01.080 --> 0:14:02.120
<v Speaker 2>and from Anthropics.

0:14:02.320 --> 0:14:04.640
<v Speaker 6>Well, this isn't the first time someone has said Congress

0:14:04.679 --> 0:14:07.040
<v Speaker 6>is not moving at the pace of technology. We've been

0:14:07.040 --> 0:14:10.120
<v Speaker 6>waiting thirty years for a data privacy bill, for protections

0:14:10.160 --> 0:14:15.000
<v Speaker 6>against for protections for children online, etc. But the reality

0:14:15.120 --> 0:14:17.079
<v Speaker 6>is this is an area where both Congress needs to

0:14:17.120 --> 0:14:20.440
<v Speaker 6>act and the administration needs to act. There should be

0:14:20.520 --> 0:14:23.320
<v Speaker 6>clear lines. I don't think a lot of folks argue

0:14:23.320 --> 0:14:26.480
<v Speaker 6>with the lines that Anthropic articulated. In fact, open Ai

0:14:26.600 --> 0:14:30.480
<v Speaker 6>seem to have embraced them. So why not rather than

0:14:30.480 --> 0:14:33.680
<v Speaker 6>punishing the company, hold these up as examples. This is

0:14:33.720 --> 0:14:36.880
<v Speaker 6>an opportunity where the industry can inform the government, and

0:14:36.920 --> 0:14:39.480
<v Speaker 6>we ought to be taking those cues you.

0:14:39.400 --> 0:14:43.320
<v Speaker 2>Say, open eyes, embrace the red lines that anthropy put forth.

0:14:43.360 --> 0:14:46.440
<v Speaker 2>There's reporting to suggest that the cynicism.

0:14:45.920 --> 0:14:50.360
<v Speaker 6>Around that, yes, well that is to be determined. I

0:14:50.360 --> 0:14:53.280
<v Speaker 6>guess I'm simply relying on what I'm hearing publicly.

0:14:53.360 --> 0:14:53.520
<v Speaker 7>Now.

0:14:53.560 --> 0:14:57.040
<v Speaker 6>Obviously I understand why there might be cynicism. Look, the

0:14:57.040 --> 0:15:01.680
<v Speaker 6>bottom line is this shouldn't be enforced by one particular

0:15:01.760 --> 0:15:04.880
<v Speaker 6>CEO at one company. There's a reason why there ought

0:15:04.880 --> 0:15:06.760
<v Speaker 6>to be a public discussion because this is going to

0:15:06.800 --> 0:15:09.000
<v Speaker 6>impact all of us, and certainly when we talk about

0:15:09.040 --> 0:15:11.400
<v Speaker 6>issues like public surveillance.

0:15:10.880 --> 0:15:14.560
<v Speaker 2>I mean, realistically, are you able to have the time,

0:15:14.680 --> 0:15:17.320
<v Speaker 2>the insight, the focus and the moment when we've got

0:15:17.360 --> 0:15:21.480
<v Speaker 2>an erupting war withether on and indeed, well government shut down?

0:15:21.640 --> 0:15:23.800
<v Speaker 2>How effective can you be at this moment? Congress?

0:15:24.120 --> 0:15:27.320
<v Speaker 6>Well, I'm not going to speak for Congress because frankly,

0:15:27.360 --> 0:15:30.680
<v Speaker 6>as you know, if you ever made a bet on

0:15:30.720 --> 0:15:33.680
<v Speaker 6>Congress not getting anything done, you win ninety nine times.

0:15:33.720 --> 0:15:37.360
<v Speaker 6>Out About Fumber's markets, yeah, they're doing pretty well. But

0:15:37.440 --> 0:15:40.360
<v Speaker 6>I will say this week I'll be introducing a provision

0:15:40.480 --> 0:15:43.600
<v Speaker 6>in what's called the Defense Productions Act really to prevent

0:15:44.840 --> 0:15:48.800
<v Speaker 6>any federal agency from retaliating against companies like Anthropic when

0:15:48.800 --> 0:15:53.280
<v Speaker 6>they proposed reasonable limits on the deployment of their technology.

0:15:53.480 --> 0:15:56.520
<v Speaker 6>Technology is obviously a wonderful thing. We know it has

0:15:56.640 --> 0:15:59.560
<v Speaker 6>enormous risks. We ought to take the cues from industry.

0:16:00.040 --> 0:16:03.760
<v Speaker 6>Tree tells us these risks are too great. Let's draw lines.

0:16:04.040 --> 0:16:06.000
<v Speaker 2>What do you think will be the support of that

0:16:06.000 --> 0:16:07.880
<v Speaker 2>bill across both aisles.

0:16:08.560 --> 0:16:12.160
<v Speaker 6>We'll be discussing it this week in the House Financial

0:16:12.160 --> 0:16:15.000
<v Speaker 6>Services Committe where we were having their markup. I'm still

0:16:15.040 --> 0:16:17.240
<v Speaker 6>having those conversations with my colleagues.

0:16:17.160 --> 0:16:19.360
<v Speaker 2>Okay, so maybe we can find some support that it

0:16:19.400 --> 0:16:21.840
<v Speaker 2>shouldn't be down. There shouldn't be retribution, There shouldn't be

0:16:21.840 --> 0:16:24.840
<v Speaker 2>sort of unprecedented moves where you deem a company a

0:16:24.920 --> 0:16:27.600
<v Speaker 2>homegrown domestic champion as a supply risk in some way.

0:16:27.960 --> 0:16:31.720
<v Speaker 2>But when you think more broadly about AI regulation in

0:16:31.760 --> 0:16:33.960
<v Speaker 2>the hands of Congress or in the hands of the

0:16:33.960 --> 0:16:37.120
<v Speaker 2>executive right now is are you comfortable with the amount

0:16:37.120 --> 0:16:39.320
<v Speaker 2>of executive orders that have been deemed around AI, the

0:16:39.360 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 2>way in which the administration has had to take maybe

0:16:42.880 --> 0:16:45.880
<v Speaker 2>the steps necessary if the Congress void is still there.

0:16:46.320 --> 0:16:49.560
<v Speaker 6>Well, I know this president is not unique and using

0:16:49.640 --> 0:16:52.240
<v Speaker 6>executive orders where Congress is failing to act. The way

0:16:52.240 --> 0:16:54.560
<v Speaker 6>in which these executive orders have been deployed a deeply

0:16:54.600 --> 0:16:58.400
<v Speaker 6>problematic and certainly we've seen in many cases quite unconstitutional.

0:16:58.760 --> 0:17:01.240
<v Speaker 6>Congress needs a step up, and that requires the majority

0:17:01.240 --> 0:17:05.520
<v Speaker 6>party to do its job, that is to defend the

0:17:05.560 --> 0:17:10.040
<v Speaker 6>progatives under Article one of the Constitution, where Congress has authority,

0:17:10.520 --> 0:17:13.439
<v Speaker 6>and we've seen a host of areas from tariffs, certainly

0:17:13.520 --> 0:17:16.480
<v Speaker 6>the AI where Congress has simply not been stepping up

0:17:16.640 --> 0:17:20.840
<v Speaker 6>and allowing this president to take too much of the turf.

0:17:21.560 --> 0:17:24.280
<v Speaker 6>There's a reason why we want Congress to be deciding this.

0:17:24.640 --> 0:17:29.000
<v Speaker 6>These are issues that have massive impacts in many communities

0:17:29.080 --> 0:17:33.280
<v Speaker 6>that are diverse communities that are simply not benefiting from

0:17:33.359 --> 0:17:35.919
<v Speaker 6>AI as much as my communities so Oka Valley might be.

0:17:36.720 --> 0:17:38.840
<v Speaker 6>That's why you need to have a national conversation.

0:17:39.160 --> 0:17:42.320
<v Speaker 2>You were having a national conversation before the conversation became

0:17:42.400 --> 0:17:45.120
<v Speaker 2>much more of war in the Middle East and war

0:17:45.160 --> 0:17:48.680
<v Speaker 2>with Iran. You were talking about how we shouldn't see

0:17:48.720 --> 0:17:52.840
<v Speaker 2>Congress just slam the brakes on AI innovation, and equally

0:17:52.840 --> 0:17:55.520
<v Speaker 2>they shouldn't accelerate. There should be a way of grabbing

0:17:55.560 --> 0:17:57.320
<v Speaker 2>the steering wheels. The way you wrote it in an

0:17:57.320 --> 0:18:02.119
<v Speaker 2>op ed. Can we get some sort of bipartisan approach

0:18:02.200 --> 0:18:04.800
<v Speaker 2>to grabbing a steering wheel in When you say so

0:18:04.880 --> 0:18:07.720
<v Speaker 2>many states are affected in different ways.

0:18:07.400 --> 0:18:10.320
<v Speaker 6>By AI, I'd like to think we can. Look, there's

0:18:10.359 --> 0:18:12.480
<v Speaker 6>a lot of fears right now around AI, around lots

0:18:12.520 --> 0:18:16.600
<v Speaker 6>of jobs, around impacts on utility bills. There are opportunities

0:18:16.600 --> 0:18:18.840
<v Speaker 6>for us to move together. For example, we know these

0:18:18.880 --> 0:18:23.680
<v Speaker 6>hyperscalers need speed. Let's give them federal permits enable them

0:18:23.680 --> 0:18:27.760
<v Speaker 6>to accelerate if they're keeping rate payers whole and protecting

0:18:27.760 --> 0:18:31.800
<v Speaker 6>them from these utility at the risk of higher prices

0:18:32.359 --> 0:18:36.280
<v Speaker 6>on their utility bills. And you know, investing in batteries

0:18:36.560 --> 0:18:38.679
<v Speaker 6>and the kinds of technology we know that will be

0:18:38.720 --> 0:18:43.520
<v Speaker 6>sustainable rather than simply pulling more natural gas and colon.

0:18:44.160 --> 0:18:46.119
<v Speaker 6>You know, for example, on jobs, there are things that

0:18:46.160 --> 0:18:49.160
<v Speaker 6>we can do that our bipyrason that can incentivize companies

0:18:49.160 --> 0:18:52.520
<v Speaker 6>to invest in community colleges and local state universities, up

0:18:52.520 --> 0:18:56.840
<v Speaker 6>skill and reskill. These are not necessarily partisan notions. This

0:18:56.920 --> 0:18:59.280
<v Speaker 6>is a time for us to be thinking more creatively

0:18:59.440 --> 0:19:02.400
<v Speaker 6>across the aisle on these kinds of solutions. We don't

0:19:02.400 --> 0:19:05.359
<v Speaker 6>have the kind of administration now in office that is

0:19:05.520 --> 0:19:08.480
<v Speaker 6>particularly bipartisan, and so it's really going to have to

0:19:09.000 --> 0:19:11.119
<v Speaker 6>come from ground up.

0:19:11.760 --> 0:19:15.400
<v Speaker 2>You mentioned social media, and I think in many ways

0:19:15.560 --> 0:19:18.200
<v Speaker 2>people have felt that there's been a void of lawmaking

0:19:18.200 --> 0:19:20.919
<v Speaker 2>around social media because there is so much nuance to

0:19:21.040 --> 0:19:24.720
<v Speaker 2>much of this. Is there sometimes too much nuance when

0:19:24.720 --> 0:19:29.080
<v Speaker 2>it comes to the likes of impact by the Pentagon's

0:19:29.080 --> 0:19:33.000
<v Speaker 2>decisions on mass surveillance, on issues of autonomous weaponry, that

0:19:33.080 --> 0:19:35.159
<v Speaker 2>really laws can't be made that can keep up.

0:19:35.320 --> 0:19:38.879
<v Speaker 6>Briefly, it's fair to say that this is incredibly complex,

0:19:39.040 --> 0:19:42.320
<v Speaker 6>and you can't simply declare amateur hour and start to

0:19:42.359 --> 0:19:47.880
<v Speaker 6>announce edicts that are going to apply broadly across multiple

0:19:47.880 --> 0:19:52.119
<v Speaker 6>industries where the impacts may be very different. What I

0:19:52.160 --> 0:19:55.320
<v Speaker 6>have been proposing, and we'll be coming out with legislation soon,

0:19:55.400 --> 0:19:59.600
<v Speaker 6>is how, for example, on AI, we can essentially enable

0:20:00.119 --> 0:20:03.760
<v Speaker 6>industry experts academic experts to be able to establish what

0:20:03.880 --> 0:20:07.320
<v Speaker 6>those best practices are in an industry, allow industry to

0:20:07.400 --> 0:20:10.560
<v Speaker 6>reach those best practices, rather than having some kind of

0:20:10.840 --> 0:20:15.199
<v Speaker 6>monolithic eedic come from Congress or the administration. Government's not

0:20:15.240 --> 0:20:17.360
<v Speaker 6>going to get it right. We have to acknowledge that

0:20:17.520 --> 0:20:20.679
<v Speaker 6>this is moving too fast. We need to rely on

0:20:20.720 --> 0:20:23.919
<v Speaker 6>the best thinking in the industry to establish what the

0:20:23.960 --> 0:20:27.920
<v Speaker 6>best practices are and then mandate that folks can reach

0:20:28.000 --> 0:20:30.960
<v Speaker 6>those they can have the benefits for example of preemption.

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:34.560
<v Speaker 6>If they don't, then they're subjected to the edicts of

0:20:34.600 --> 0:20:35.640
<v Speaker 6>fifty different states.

0:20:36.080 --> 0:20:37.320
<v Speaker 2>We appreciate you stopping by.

0:20:37.680 --> 0:20:38.600
<v Speaker 8>It's great to be with you.

0:20:38.520 --> 0:20:41.480
<v Speaker 2>You see here in New York Representative Sam Niicado, who

0:20:41.520 --> 0:20:44.960
<v Speaker 2>represents the heart of Silicon Valley and much more in California.

0:20:45.359 --> 0:20:48.760
<v Speaker 2>Now coming up Bitcoin, it shakes off invest a caution

0:20:48.920 --> 0:20:52.120
<v Speaker 2>as Middle East tensions they rattle global markets, will bring

0:20:52.119 --> 0:21:08.119
<v Speaker 2>you more market impact. Next, this is Blomberg Tech Bitcoin

0:21:08.359 --> 0:21:11.240
<v Speaker 2>staging and comeback nearing seventy thousand dollars levels after the

0:21:11.320 --> 0:21:14.560
<v Speaker 2>US and is really a taxed on Iran shook investor

0:21:14.600 --> 0:21:17.200
<v Speaker 2>confidence over the weekend. Who in the latest is Bloomberg

0:21:17.200 --> 0:21:20.399
<v Speaker 2>Cross asset reporter Isabelle Lee. They shape people with thinking

0:21:20.440 --> 0:21:22.399
<v Speaker 2>of a world of war. That is not something to

0:21:22.440 --> 0:21:24.960
<v Speaker 2>take lightly. But we think about the assets impacted. How

0:21:25.040 --> 0:21:27.800
<v Speaker 2>is bitcoin managing to rally through this? Definitely behaving like

0:21:27.840 --> 0:21:29.560
<v Speaker 2>a risk asset. I feel like, I mean, when you

0:21:29.840 --> 0:21:32.119
<v Speaker 2>see a big pullback like that, it's eventually going to

0:21:32.160 --> 0:21:34.359
<v Speaker 2>bounce back. It's now higher by around six percent after

0:21:34.440 --> 0:21:37.479
<v Speaker 2>dropping as much as sixty three percent sixty three thousand

0:21:37.520 --> 0:21:39.960
<v Speaker 2>over the weekend. Other less liquid, smaller coins are also

0:21:39.960 --> 0:21:42.560
<v Speaker 2>in degree in higher by six percent, like ether. The

0:21:42.600 --> 0:21:44.760
<v Speaker 2>thing I love about cryptocurrency is that trades twenty four

0:21:44.760 --> 0:21:46.679
<v Speaker 2>to seven, and you really can see and use it

0:21:46.720 --> 0:21:49.600
<v Speaker 2>as a risk sentiment when markets are closed, and now

0:21:49.640 --> 0:21:52.560
<v Speaker 2>that we see US stark open, you see worries about

0:21:52.560 --> 0:21:55.760
<v Speaker 2>an inflation resurgence. For instance, bonds are slumping, traders are

0:21:55.760 --> 0:21:58.800
<v Speaker 2>trimming their FED rate cuts, heaven assets are surging dollar

0:21:58.960 --> 0:21:59.800
<v Speaker 2>gold oil.

0:22:00.119 --> 0:22:02.880
<v Speaker 9>Of course, an interestingly higher oil prices will actually weigh

0:22:02.920 --> 0:22:06.120
<v Speaker 9>on crypto prices because crypto prices are behaving like tech

0:22:06.160 --> 0:22:08.600
<v Speaker 9>stocks and risk assets, and of course those are sensitive

0:22:08.680 --> 0:22:11.439
<v Speaker 9>defed erate moves. So everything is just interconnected, and I

0:22:11.440 --> 0:22:13.439
<v Speaker 9>find that very interesting. In the top of all of this,

0:22:13.720 --> 0:22:15.919
<v Speaker 9>it's a busy week for US ECO data. We have

0:22:16.000 --> 0:22:18.800
<v Speaker 9>non farm payrolls. We also have unemployment rate and now

0:22:18.800 --> 0:22:20.679
<v Speaker 9>for now we have more questions than answers. We have

0:22:20.680 --> 0:22:23.360
<v Speaker 9>President Trump saying that the attacks could last a few weeks.

0:22:23.400 --> 0:22:26.120
<v Speaker 9>So I think investors are just really preparing themselves for

0:22:26.160 --> 0:22:28.840
<v Speaker 9>the tailors events and preparing for worst case outcomes. But

0:22:28.880 --> 0:22:31.119
<v Speaker 9>at least for now that cooin is nearing seventy thousand.

0:22:31.359 --> 0:22:34.320
<v Speaker 2>You keep us prepared as WELLI we appreciate it on

0:22:34.400 --> 0:22:37.440
<v Speaker 2>all things of the market's reaction to a story that continues,

0:22:37.480 --> 0:22:40.560
<v Speaker 2>because coming up we will join by American Enterprise Institute's

0:22:40.560 --> 0:22:45.520
<v Speaker 2>senior fellow, Corey Shocky on all things defense, tech, geopolitics,

0:22:45.760 --> 0:22:46.440
<v Speaker 2>so much more.

0:22:47.240 --> 0:22:59.080
<v Speaker 8>This is Bloomberg Tech.

0:23:01.840 --> 0:23:03.639
<v Speaker 2>Welcome back to bluemmeg Tech. We take a look at

0:23:03.680 --> 0:23:07.520
<v Speaker 2>these markets, markets that are currently reacting to the news

0:23:07.600 --> 0:23:09.960
<v Speaker 2>over the course of the weekend war in the Middle East,

0:23:10.440 --> 0:23:12.719
<v Speaker 2>war with Iran. We're currently down on the Nastak one

0:23:12.800 --> 0:23:15.280
<v Speaker 2>hundred by some five ts percent, coming back into Low's

0:23:15.280 --> 0:23:17.639
<v Speaker 2>having tried to bounce into the green on the border indices.

0:23:18.040 --> 0:23:20.920
<v Speaker 2>Video is actually up more than two percent because deals

0:23:20.960 --> 0:23:23.040
<v Speaker 2>are still getting done. From an M and A perspective,

0:23:23.119 --> 0:23:25.440
<v Speaker 2>or from an investment perspective, this is as we see

0:23:25.440 --> 0:23:28.320
<v Speaker 2>in video making four billion dollars investment in data center

0:23:28.359 --> 0:23:32.399
<v Speaker 2>optics companies. That's coherent and momentum. Their stock surge. Palenteer

0:23:32.800 --> 0:23:35.919
<v Speaker 2>defense Tech. There is buying of this name for obvious reasons.

0:23:35.920 --> 0:23:38.919
<v Speaker 2>On the day we're up almost six percent, but CrowdStrike

0:23:39.040 --> 0:23:41.600
<v Speaker 2>is also interesting. Look are great colleagues at bloemmeg Intelligence

0:23:41.600 --> 0:23:45.240
<v Speaker 2>like mandat Si seeing putting out really great notes talking

0:23:45.280 --> 0:23:47.639
<v Speaker 2>about how palenteer of courses going to see buying a

0:23:47.680 --> 0:23:51.320
<v Speaker 2>mid geopolitical tensions. We'll also see tailwinds for security spending

0:23:51.520 --> 0:23:54.720
<v Speaker 2>with the larger companies such as CrowdStrike Palo Alto likely

0:23:54.880 --> 0:23:58.119
<v Speaker 2>to see some focus and mid concerns about cyber attacks.

0:23:58.160 --> 0:23:59.960
<v Speaker 2>We'll get into that in a little bit, but let's

0:24:00.080 --> 0:24:03.119
<v Speaker 2>head back now to DC, where it's notable that the

0:24:03.119 --> 0:24:06.639
<v Speaker 2>Pentagon is shifting AI providers after reaching a deal with

0:24:06.680 --> 0:24:10.720
<v Speaker 2>opening I to deploy its models within the department's classified network. Rumat.

0:24:10.840 --> 0:24:13.280
<v Speaker 2>Senior Tech editor Mike she But joins us on what

0:24:13.400 --> 0:24:18.000
<v Speaker 2>is an extraordinary story that intertwines with a geopolitical story.

0:24:18.400 --> 0:24:21.520
<v Speaker 2>How significant is this move that Sam Altman goes where

0:24:21.560 --> 0:24:23.080
<v Speaker 2>Daria Ama Day won't.

0:24:23.440 --> 0:24:26.960
<v Speaker 10>Well, it's not just significant that it happened, it's also

0:24:27.080 --> 0:24:30.879
<v Speaker 10>caraed that it happened so quickly after the Pentagon decided

0:24:30.880 --> 0:24:34.480
<v Speaker 10>that it would walk away from its relationship with Anthropic,

0:24:34.960 --> 0:24:38.760
<v Speaker 10>which had been in place for roughly a year and

0:24:39.160 --> 0:24:43.000
<v Speaker 10>the Anthropic had really worked itself into the classified space

0:24:43.600 --> 0:24:46.640
<v Speaker 10>that is crucial for the Pentagon being able to deploy

0:24:46.800 --> 0:24:52.120
<v Speaker 10>artificial intelligence in some fashion during critical operations, including combat,

0:24:52.200 --> 0:24:56.640
<v Speaker 10>and Anthropics products have been used bipalent here as part

0:24:56.680 --> 0:24:59.919
<v Speaker 10>of this so called maven system that colloquially might be

0:25:00.040 --> 0:25:03.560
<v Speaker 10>thought of as windows for war where battlefield commanders can

0:25:03.960 --> 0:25:08.800
<v Speaker 10>have access to information and have it interpreted and processed

0:25:08.840 --> 0:25:12.240
<v Speaker 10>and analyzed and assessed in a much faster fashion and

0:25:12.320 --> 0:25:15.960
<v Speaker 10>presented to them. Now, what this means is that within

0:25:16.040 --> 0:25:19.440
<v Speaker 10>six months, the Pentagon must transition to a new provider,

0:25:19.480 --> 0:25:22.840
<v Speaker 10>and open AI and arch rival to Anthropic, is stepping in.

0:25:23.160 --> 0:25:25.440
<v Speaker 10>And what they are saying also is that they are

0:25:25.480 --> 0:25:29.640
<v Speaker 10>willing to take the terms that Anthropic thought were unacceptable,

0:25:30.160 --> 0:25:34.720
<v Speaker 10>terms that open AI says still respects its own guidelines

0:25:34.760 --> 0:25:37.000
<v Speaker 10>when it comes to two key areas, and that is

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:42.840
<v Speaker 10>mass surveillance of Americans and also deployment of fully autonomous weapons.

0:25:42.880 --> 0:25:45.840
<v Speaker 10>Open AI says that the contract and the relationship with

0:25:45.920 --> 0:25:49.720
<v Speaker 10>the Pentagon are strong enough that those two requirements by

0:25:49.840 --> 0:25:54.040
<v Speaker 10>the firm are respected. Anthropic, from its standpoint, did not

0:25:54.200 --> 0:25:56.560
<v Speaker 10>see the same in the contract language, and it will

0:25:56.600 --> 0:26:00.399
<v Speaker 10>be interesting to see how this unfoldes, Carol, because the

0:26:00.520 --> 0:26:04.159
<v Speaker 10>US government has declared Anthropic a supply chain risk and

0:26:04.320 --> 0:26:10.320
<v Speaker 10>also ordered it off US government agency networks elsewhere, and Treasure.

0:26:10.000 --> 0:26:13.600
<v Speaker 2>Sectory Scott Besson talking this morning saying that the Treasure

0:26:13.600 --> 0:26:16.639
<v Speaker 2>Department is terminating all use of Anthropic products, is following

0:26:16.640 --> 0:26:20.000
<v Speaker 2>President Trump's direction on Anthropic, But of course this is

0:26:20.000 --> 0:26:22.840
<v Speaker 2>as the consumer moves in a different direction. Mike. We've

0:26:22.880 --> 0:26:26.200
<v Speaker 2>actually seen Anthropic in many ways not offline for consumers

0:26:26.240 --> 0:26:30.280
<v Speaker 2>because so many people were demanding the product and downloading it,

0:26:30.640 --> 0:26:33.720
<v Speaker 2>and maybe as some sort of pushback to open AI.

0:26:34.119 --> 0:26:37.160
<v Speaker 2>There's calls to cancel chat GPT on the internet.

0:26:37.680 --> 0:26:40.320
<v Speaker 10>Well, that's right, Kera, we are seeing some of this

0:26:40.840 --> 0:26:45.320
<v Speaker 10>popular sentiment swell in Anthropics favor. Certainly online there is

0:26:45.920 --> 0:26:48.840
<v Speaker 10>a lot of applause in favor of Dario Amiday and

0:26:48.840 --> 0:26:52.320
<v Speaker 10>would have seen as a principal stance by many against

0:26:52.320 --> 0:26:56.880
<v Speaker 10>depending on against the administration. That you know, look, if

0:26:57.000 --> 0:27:00.399
<v Speaker 10>you thought that you couldn't do business with and Thropic,

0:27:00.440 --> 0:27:03.439
<v Speaker 10>why not just cancel the contract? Declaring them a supply

0:27:03.560 --> 0:27:05.919
<v Speaker 10>chain risk was seen by many as going a step

0:27:05.960 --> 0:27:09.159
<v Speaker 10>too far and being vindictive. It's also important to remember

0:27:09.160 --> 0:27:12.719
<v Speaker 10>that Claude's products are gaining popularity because many see them

0:27:12.760 --> 0:27:13.400
<v Speaker 10>as quite good.

0:27:13.440 --> 0:27:14.720
<v Speaker 2>And we have talked.

0:27:16.040 --> 0:27:19.520
<v Speaker 10>In this space about how much Claude is threatening to

0:27:19.560 --> 0:27:23.720
<v Speaker 10>disrupt other industries such as law, such as financial services,

0:27:23.760 --> 0:27:27.560
<v Speaker 10>wealth management, you name it. And the tools that Claude

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:30.200
<v Speaker 10>offers really have some benefits, and that is yet another

0:27:30.280 --> 0:27:33.639
<v Speaker 10>reason in addition to perhaps this populist sentiment swing.

0:27:34.119 --> 0:27:36.520
<v Speaker 2>Mike Shepard always on the news. We appreciate it so

0:27:36.600 --> 0:27:40.200
<v Speaker 2>much from DC that let's bring in Corey Shocking, Senior

0:27:40.200 --> 0:27:43.240
<v Speaker 2>Fellow and Director of Foreign and Defense Policy Studies at

0:27:43.280 --> 0:27:47.280
<v Speaker 2>the American Enterprise Institute. You've been thinking about really the

0:27:47.320 --> 0:27:50.840
<v Speaker 2>Pentagon's reaction to this. Just talk us through your thinking

0:27:50.880 --> 0:27:54.320
<v Speaker 2>as to whether the step of banning Anthropic from the

0:27:54.359 --> 0:27:56.600
<v Speaker 2>supply chain in this way is the right step.

0:27:57.920 --> 0:28:02.040
<v Speaker 7>It's a petulant reaction by this Secretary of Defense that's

0:28:02.280 --> 0:28:06.240
<v Speaker 7>likely to turn out to be advantageous to Anthropic, but

0:28:06.440 --> 0:28:09.119
<v Speaker 7>it's going to be bad for the Defense Department and

0:28:09.240 --> 0:28:13.560
<v Speaker 7>bad for the security of the United States. The idea

0:28:13.720 --> 0:28:19.240
<v Speaker 7>that you could either nationalize or blacklist a leading American

0:28:19.320 --> 0:28:23.720
<v Speaker 7>company is outrageous and it's going to discourage other leading

0:28:23.840 --> 0:28:27.720
<v Speaker 7>edge tech firms from being willing to expose their business

0:28:28.000 --> 0:28:30.960
<v Speaker 7>by participating in the defense ecosystem.

0:28:31.640 --> 0:28:34.520
<v Speaker 2>Okay, there's going to be immediate shock, as you say,

0:28:34.600 --> 0:28:37.240
<v Speaker 2>from those in the space and the reaction function of

0:28:37.240 --> 0:28:41.760
<v Speaker 2>the Pentagon. But more broadly, how transparent should these sorts

0:28:41.760 --> 0:28:45.520
<v Speaker 2>of conversations become at this moment? Very difficult ethical questions

0:28:45.520 --> 0:28:48.280
<v Speaker 2>that seem to be shown a significant public light on

0:28:48.360 --> 0:28:51.200
<v Speaker 2>by dari Ama Day, the leader of Anthropic himself.

0:28:52.400 --> 0:28:55.320
<v Speaker 7>Yeah, I think that's exactly right. I mean, this is

0:28:55.680 --> 0:29:01.360
<v Speaker 7>a frontier technology that we are still understanding what its

0:29:01.400 --> 0:29:05.000
<v Speaker 7>consequences are going to be. And to suggest that we

0:29:05.160 --> 0:29:09.000
<v Speaker 7>have less transparency or that a firm has no right

0:29:09.280 --> 0:29:13.800
<v Speaker 7>to set standards on how a cutting edge technology will

0:29:13.840 --> 0:29:17.920
<v Speaker 7>be utilized by the Defense Department, I think is probably

0:29:17.920 --> 0:29:22.520
<v Speaker 7>a losing proposition for DoD What should.

0:29:22.200 --> 0:29:24.560
<v Speaker 2>Be forced, what could be forced by Congress? We just

0:29:24.640 --> 0:29:27.960
<v Speaker 2>had a representative of California to start the show talking

0:29:27.960 --> 0:29:32.000
<v Speaker 2>about wanting to bring law to bed that companies aren't

0:29:32.320 --> 0:29:34.760
<v Speaker 2>pushed off of any sort of national supply chain in

0:29:34.800 --> 0:29:38.560
<v Speaker 2>any retribution act. But what move already can be done

0:29:38.560 --> 0:29:41.360
<v Speaker 2>by Congress at this moment to make clearer the lines.

0:29:42.280 --> 0:29:45.920
<v Speaker 7>Well, Congress really runs defense policy and they can legislate

0:29:46.040 --> 0:29:49.560
<v Speaker 7>in this space and DoD will be required to be

0:29:49.760 --> 0:29:53.960
<v Speaker 7>compliant with it. It's actually shocking to think that the

0:29:54.040 --> 0:29:59.080
<v Speaker 7>Defense Department blacklisted an American company. That's the kind of

0:29:59.120 --> 0:30:03.560
<v Speaker 7>thing we do to Chinese firms, not to patriotic American

0:30:03.600 --> 0:30:08.480
<v Speaker 7>firms who are already participating in classified DoD activity.

0:30:09.160 --> 0:30:11.920
<v Speaker 2>Can you give us some guiding principles on then, how

0:30:12.440 --> 0:30:15.640
<v Speaker 2>open Ai and sam Altman might be able to find

0:30:16.320 --> 0:30:19.000
<v Speaker 2>appeasement in a contract. Do you think extra steps had

0:30:19.040 --> 0:30:21.640
<v Speaker 2>been taken? Is there though really a need at this

0:30:21.720 --> 0:30:25.400
<v Speaker 2>moment for companies to see the law as it stands

0:30:25.880 --> 0:30:28.400
<v Speaker 2>as where the line should be, rather than trying to

0:30:28.440 --> 0:30:30.880
<v Speaker 2>insert their own language into certain contracts.

0:30:31.600 --> 0:30:35.640
<v Speaker 7>Well, it's an open question, but I do think that

0:30:36.400 --> 0:30:39.800
<v Speaker 7>open Ai is saying, yes, we trust the government that

0:30:39.840 --> 0:30:42.160
<v Speaker 7>they won't use our product in a way they say

0:30:42.200 --> 0:30:47.600
<v Speaker 7>they won't, and Anthropic is saying, we actually need proof

0:30:48.080 --> 0:30:53.520
<v Speaker 7>and we need indemnification that our product is being used

0:30:53.600 --> 0:30:57.160
<v Speaker 7>as we are advertising our product. I think, given the

0:30:57.240 --> 0:31:00.760
<v Speaker 7>low level of trust in the Trump Department of Defense,

0:31:01.240 --> 0:31:06.400
<v Speaker 7>this is likely to be advantageous marketing for Anthropic and

0:31:06.680 --> 0:31:10.640
<v Speaker 7>very difficult for DoD to be able to say you

0:31:10.840 --> 0:31:13.520
<v Speaker 7>need to trust that we will abide by the law,

0:31:14.200 --> 0:31:18.880
<v Speaker 7>when so much of their behavior, including blacklisting an American company,

0:31:19.480 --> 0:31:22.680
<v Speaker 7>looks to be a bending of the law, or at

0:31:22.760 --> 0:31:26.560
<v Speaker 7>least an aggressive and predatory use of the law.

0:31:26.960 --> 0:31:29.040
<v Speaker 2>Corey, it is interesting open AI defended saying that it

0:31:29.080 --> 0:31:31.200
<v Speaker 2>built a number of safeguards into the contract with the

0:31:31.240 --> 0:31:34.240
<v Speaker 2>Pentagon and agrees with said the Pentagon actually agrees with

0:31:34.280 --> 0:31:38.200
<v Speaker 2>these principles and reflects them in law and policy. When

0:31:38.240 --> 0:31:42.640
<v Speaker 2>we're thinking about where AI's role now is in defense

0:31:43.120 --> 0:31:46.520
<v Speaker 2>in war, as we're currently seeing an unfold, can you

0:31:46.560 --> 0:31:49.520
<v Speaker 2>just educate our audience as to how integral AIS now become.

0:31:50.880 --> 0:31:54.920
<v Speaker 7>Yes, what AI is already proving incredibly valuable for in

0:31:54.960 --> 0:32:00.800
<v Speaker 7>the defense space is serving enormous amounts of data, for example,

0:32:00.960 --> 0:32:08.720
<v Speaker 7>identifying threat portfolios. You know, the ability to see patterns

0:32:08.760 --> 0:32:12.520
<v Speaker 7>in large amounts of data. But what Anthropic is saying

0:32:12.840 --> 0:32:15.880
<v Speaker 7>is we do not want it to be used for

0:32:16.320 --> 0:32:21.479
<v Speaker 7>domestic surveillance of the US or for decisions about the

0:32:21.640 --> 0:32:26.480
<v Speaker 7>use of lethal force before we have higher confidence in

0:32:26.520 --> 0:32:31.520
<v Speaker 7>the model and those are not unreasonable standards and provide

0:32:31.560 --> 0:32:34.960
<v Speaker 7>the basis for what Congress perhaps ought to put into

0:32:35.040 --> 0:32:39.600
<v Speaker 7>law until we have better transparency and better understanding of

0:32:39.640 --> 0:32:42.920
<v Speaker 7>what these models are capable of in future iterations.

0:32:43.280 --> 0:32:45.719
<v Speaker 2>Cry shocking. Great to speak with you of the American

0:32:45.800 --> 0:32:48.760
<v Speaker 2>Enterprise Institute. We appreciate your time and expertise today. Look

0:32:48.800 --> 0:32:52.920
<v Speaker 2>as the conflict with Iran intensifies, cybersecurity experts their warning

0:32:52.920 --> 0:32:56.320
<v Speaker 2>of a rise in Iranian linked cyber threats targeting critical

0:32:56.320 --> 0:32:59.880
<v Speaker 2>networks and infrastructure joining us to discuss Cynthia Kaiser as

0:33:00.400 --> 0:33:03.320
<v Speaker 2>senior vice president of Ransomware Research Center at House and

0:33:03.840 --> 0:33:07.560
<v Speaker 2>former Deputy Director of the FBI Cyber Division, Cynthia, are

0:33:07.560 --> 0:33:08.360
<v Speaker 2>those threats real?

0:33:09.840 --> 0:33:13.600
<v Speaker 11>They are? We're already seeing Iran have real threats and

0:33:13.920 --> 0:33:18.520
<v Speaker 11>conduct cyberactivity against organizations in the Middle East, and we

0:33:18.560 --> 0:33:22.400
<v Speaker 11>anticipate that they could follow on with operations here in

0:33:22.440 --> 0:33:23.280
<v Speaker 11>the United States.

0:33:23.880 --> 0:33:27.000
<v Speaker 2>And we said infrastructure in particular, where are the vulnerability

0:33:27.080 --> 0:33:28.840
<v Speaker 2>is likely to be targeting.

0:33:29.760 --> 0:33:33.680
<v Speaker 11>So throughout infrastructure in the Middle East and in the US,

0:33:33.960 --> 0:33:37.440
<v Speaker 11>we see Iran target what they can get into. So

0:33:37.480 --> 0:33:40.760
<v Speaker 11>it doesn't really matter the sector, It matters how the

0:33:41.040 --> 0:33:45.440
<v Speaker 11>specific organization has done with their cybersecurity, has been able

0:33:45.480 --> 0:33:49.760
<v Speaker 11>to fix those vulnerabilities, because what Iran does. They go on,

0:33:50.360 --> 0:33:54.040
<v Speaker 11>they try to exploit something, get into something, and then

0:33:54.080 --> 0:33:56.640
<v Speaker 11>they go out in the media and they say we've

0:33:56.680 --> 0:33:59.800
<v Speaker 11>done more. So I've gotten under one machine in an organization,

0:34:00.160 --> 0:34:02.560
<v Speaker 11>but I'm going to say that we've gotten onto the

0:34:02.720 --> 0:34:06.120
<v Speaker 11>entire facility, and say a water treatment facility is down.

0:34:06.240 --> 0:34:09.720
<v Speaker 11>So it's really a mix within critical infrastructure of getting

0:34:09.760 --> 0:34:14.000
<v Speaker 11>onto something but then moving on and lying and exaggerating

0:34:14.120 --> 0:34:16.080
<v Speaker 11>to try to stoke fear and chaos.

0:34:16.160 --> 0:34:19.880
<v Speaker 2>How sophisticated is their ability to get onto something.

0:34:21.040 --> 0:34:23.920
<v Speaker 11>So they are one of the world's most malicious and

0:34:24.120 --> 0:34:29.880
<v Speaker 11>capable cyber actors in critical infrastructure. Overall, there are many

0:34:29.960 --> 0:34:33.880
<v Speaker 11>many devices that are connected to the Internet and haven't

0:34:33.920 --> 0:34:38.640
<v Speaker 11>been hatched for vulnerabilities that Iran is exploiting. Just late

0:34:38.719 --> 0:34:42.040
<v Speaker 11>last year, FBI put out a warning about Iranian state

0:34:42.080 --> 0:34:45.440
<v Speaker 11>sponsored actors who are targeting critical infrastructure in the United

0:34:45.440 --> 0:34:47.920
<v Speaker 11>States through these types of vulnerabilities.

0:34:48.840 --> 0:34:51.880
<v Speaker 2>From the perspective that we see the market as always

0:34:52.120 --> 0:34:55.000
<v Speaker 2>trying to get ahead of any sort of concerns and

0:34:55.080 --> 0:34:57.520
<v Speaker 2>indeed well move money on the back of it, we've

0:34:57.520 --> 0:35:00.200
<v Speaker 2>seen cloud strike on the highest side, seeing padow to

0:35:00.280 --> 0:35:05.080
<v Speaker 2>networks in the green always seeing really a desire to

0:35:05.120 --> 0:35:08.680
<v Speaker 2>be fop the infrastructure of resistance, to be seeing our

0:35:08.760 --> 0:35:12.279
<v Speaker 2>companies have the right place, the right sort of restraints

0:35:12.280 --> 0:35:14.800
<v Speaker 2>on well use cases in place. At the moment.

0:35:16.040 --> 0:35:19.880
<v Speaker 11>Absolutely, we've seen a lot of movement tours, being able

0:35:19.960 --> 0:35:23.440
<v Speaker 11>to practice incident response plans, know what you're going to

0:35:23.520 --> 0:35:26.160
<v Speaker 11>do if you are hit, including what you're going to

0:35:26.200 --> 0:35:28.960
<v Speaker 11>do in the media to say if something's being exaggerated,

0:35:29.440 --> 0:35:32.480
<v Speaker 11>to patch devices that maybe we're on some type of

0:35:32.480 --> 0:35:37.200
<v Speaker 11>schedule to be patched later, doing that today, and conducting

0:35:37.600 --> 0:35:40.480
<v Speaker 11>a lot of engagement across industry as well as with

0:35:40.560 --> 0:35:43.600
<v Speaker 11>the FBI to be able to know the latest on

0:35:43.680 --> 0:35:46.320
<v Speaker 11>what might be coming down and what threats that they're.

0:35:46.160 --> 0:35:48.319
<v Speaker 2>Facing and the threats to all II in many ways,

0:35:48.320 --> 0:35:50.600
<v Speaker 2>I'm sure Cynthia, they are.

0:35:50.840 --> 0:35:53.640
<v Speaker 11>We've seen a lot of AI enabled threats and really

0:35:54.000 --> 0:35:57.360
<v Speaker 11>where we see the biggest risk with AI enabled threats

0:35:57.440 --> 0:36:01.799
<v Speaker 11>is in wanna be or very low level actors. But

0:36:01.840 --> 0:36:05.160
<v Speaker 11>that's who I RAN might use I RAN users proxies

0:36:05.200 --> 0:36:07.959
<v Speaker 11>to be able to conduct their activity. There's one group

0:36:08.000 --> 0:36:11.680
<v Speaker 11>our Healthy on Intel team had identified who named Sakari,

0:36:11.800 --> 0:36:16.760
<v Speaker 11>who is currently telling its members to conduct activity conduct

0:36:16.760 --> 0:36:20.960
<v Speaker 11>attacks in the Middle East. But they've used AI to

0:36:21.320 --> 0:36:25.440
<v Speaker 11>make their bad software. They're what they're deploying and it

0:36:25.440 --> 0:36:28.200
<v Speaker 11>doesn't work very well. But what it actually means is

0:36:28.239 --> 0:36:31.520
<v Speaker 11>it destroys networks when it gets on instead of being

0:36:31.560 --> 0:36:33.839
<v Speaker 11>this kind of ransom you're going to pay to try

0:36:33.880 --> 0:36:35.320
<v Speaker 11>to get back online.

0:36:35.719 --> 0:36:38.520
<v Speaker 2>Oh so like collateral damage when actually just trying to

0:36:38.880 --> 0:36:43.239
<v Speaker 2>exert financial damage, Cynthia. From the perspective of AI, we

0:36:43.360 --> 0:36:45.280
<v Speaker 2>just come off the back of a couple of weeks

0:36:45.320 --> 0:36:49.839
<v Speaker 2>where software names were pummeled, where particularly cyber companies were

0:36:49.920 --> 0:36:52.640
<v Speaker 2>under pressure because people thought general to AI companies were

0:36:52.640 --> 0:36:55.120
<v Speaker 2>going to be able to take their business. A plugin

0:36:55.200 --> 0:36:58.600
<v Speaker 2>from Anthropic would be the answer to our our ransomware

0:36:58.640 --> 0:37:01.759
<v Speaker 2>and cyber concerns. How are you seeing that evolve? How

0:37:01.760 --> 0:37:04.160
<v Speaker 2>are you seeing companies actually wanting to use and build

0:37:04.200 --> 0:37:06.959
<v Speaker 2>from within or still dependent on external offerings.

0:37:08.040 --> 0:37:10.640
<v Speaker 11>So being able to build within is really important in

0:37:10.680 --> 0:37:14.280
<v Speaker 11>a way to consistently know what's going on your network,

0:37:14.320 --> 0:37:17.040
<v Speaker 11>be able to fix those vulnerabilities I talked about in

0:37:17.120 --> 0:37:22.960
<v Speaker 11>real time, and then be able to identify other errors

0:37:23.040 --> 0:37:25.360
<v Speaker 11>or things that might be going on that are malicious

0:37:25.400 --> 0:37:29.720
<v Speaker 11>across a network. But it's only going to know what's

0:37:29.760 --> 0:37:31.719
<v Speaker 11>plugged into it. It's not going to have a lot

0:37:31.760 --> 0:37:35.040
<v Speaker 11>of these this additional information. What a threat group might

0:37:35.080 --> 0:37:38.279
<v Speaker 11>be saying in a dark web forum, what's the new

0:37:38.480 --> 0:37:41.360
<v Speaker 11>zero day that might be coming down the pike. Figuring

0:37:41.360 --> 0:37:45.400
<v Speaker 11>out that aspect, being able to plug the really sensitive

0:37:45.480 --> 0:37:49.480
<v Speaker 11>great information the private sector has into some of these

0:37:49.520 --> 0:37:54.279
<v Speaker 11>new processes. Organizations just mean the cyber security is going

0:37:54.320 --> 0:37:56.360
<v Speaker 11>to be better. It doesn't mean there's a replacement on

0:37:56.360 --> 0:37:57.239
<v Speaker 11>either side.

0:37:57.560 --> 0:38:00.000
<v Speaker 2>Can you take us to allies? Can you take us

0:38:00.120 --> 0:38:02.640
<v Speaker 2>as to how strong their defenses.

0:38:02.200 --> 0:38:08.840
<v Speaker 11>Are across the close allies the United States has, there

0:38:08.880 --> 0:38:13.040
<v Speaker 11>are lots of sharing implement things implemented as well as

0:38:13.320 --> 0:38:19.160
<v Speaker 11>these sharing mechanisms where we're sitting inside different governments, they're

0:38:19.200 --> 0:38:22.040
<v Speaker 11>sitting with us to be able to counter cyber threats.

0:38:22.040 --> 0:38:24.720
<v Speaker 11>Because this has been practiced for years.

0:38:24.920 --> 0:38:25.799
<v Speaker 2>Cyber threats just.

0:38:25.760 --> 0:38:29.840
<v Speaker 11>Don't have any boundaries. They're going across the entire world.

0:38:29.840 --> 0:38:33.520
<v Speaker 11>That's especially true with our European allies, with Australian allies,

0:38:33.640 --> 0:38:38.319
<v Speaker 11>with Israel, and so we have really identified ways to

0:38:38.360 --> 0:38:42.839
<v Speaker 11>share quickly share in real time these threats that are

0:38:42.920 --> 0:38:46.719
<v Speaker 11>facing all of us, and we all face the same challenges,

0:38:46.760 --> 0:38:48.759
<v Speaker 11>but we all can come up with the same solutions

0:38:49.200 --> 0:38:52.360
<v Speaker 11>and really counter these adversaries together.

0:38:52.840 --> 0:38:56.279
<v Speaker 2>And Cynthia, from just an audience perspective, is as likely

0:38:56.360 --> 0:38:59.560
<v Speaker 2>to be an attack that is focused in the end

0:38:59.680 --> 0:39:03.200
<v Speaker 2>prize in one's work environment, or could this be something

0:39:03.239 --> 0:39:05.440
<v Speaker 2>that you're navigating as a consumer.

0:39:05.520 --> 0:39:08.360
<v Speaker 11>Right now, it's mostly going to be focused within the

0:39:08.480 --> 0:39:12.720
<v Speaker 11>enterprise environment, especially within the United States. We have seen

0:39:13.280 --> 0:39:18.239
<v Speaker 11>Middle Eastern countries organizations in those countries being targeted by

0:39:18.360 --> 0:39:21.719
<v Speaker 11>Iranian state sponsored groups in the last few days for

0:39:21.840 --> 0:39:25.680
<v Speaker 11>some of the data they might have on people, whether

0:39:25.760 --> 0:39:31.880
<v Speaker 11>that's patients, customers, parts, and employees of that organization. We

0:39:31.960 --> 0:39:35.080
<v Speaker 11>do see Iran going out trying to identify personal information

0:39:35.160 --> 0:39:39.440
<v Speaker 11>for people they perceive maybe dissidents or enemies of the

0:39:39.480 --> 0:39:42.480
<v Speaker 11>Iranian regime, and that's something to watch out for there,

0:39:42.680 --> 0:39:45.520
<v Speaker 11>but we haven't necessarily seen that come over to the

0:39:45.640 --> 0:39:48.640
<v Speaker 11>United States or to our European allies.

0:39:49.239 --> 0:39:53.360
<v Speaker 2>Cynthia Kaiser of House and former FBI Deputy Director, we

0:39:53.480 --> 0:39:54.520
<v Speaker 2>appreciate your time