WEBVTT - Bloomberg Businessweek Weekend - October 8th, 2022

0:00:04.400 --> 0:00:07.920
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and

0:00:08.000 --> 0:00:13.680
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovik from Bloomberg Radio. Hi, everyone,

0:00:13.720 --> 0:00:16.360
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the weekend edition of Bloomberg Business Week. This

0:00:16.440 --> 0:00:18.600
<v Speaker 1>past week saw the biggest two day rally in U

0:00:18.640 --> 0:00:22.840
<v Speaker 1>s Dock since as investors continued a debate over a

0:00:22.920 --> 0:00:26.479
<v Speaker 1>more or less hawkish fed and then while Elon and

0:00:26.560 --> 0:00:29.120
<v Speaker 1>Twitter were the big tech topic of the week, it

0:00:29.240 --> 0:00:32.640
<v Speaker 1>is really Elon's other business of self driving cars that

0:00:32.680 --> 0:00:34.680
<v Speaker 1>makes the cover this week. We'll get to that in

0:00:34.720 --> 0:00:37.320
<v Speaker 1>just a moment. Speaking of innovation and change, we're going

0:00:37.360 --> 0:00:40.000
<v Speaker 1>to explore the new world order many are facing when

0:00:40.040 --> 0:00:42.800
<v Speaker 1>it comes to alternative energy, e commerce, and e learning.

0:00:43.040 --> 0:00:45.279
<v Speaker 1>We're gonna speak with the CEO of Pearson, as well

0:00:45.320 --> 0:00:47.320
<v Speaker 1>as the founder of All of It's an e commerce

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:50.040
<v Speaker 1>business with a mission to reduce waste, getting rid of

0:00:50.080 --> 0:00:53.199
<v Speaker 1>those cardboard boxes. Yeah, exactly. Let's stick around for a

0:00:53.320 --> 0:00:55.040
<v Speaker 1>second hour. That's when we're going to talk about the

0:00:55.080 --> 0:00:57.320
<v Speaker 1>power of quitting. We'll do that with former pro poker

0:00:57.360 --> 0:00:59.680
<v Speaker 1>player Annie Duke. All of that to come, but first

0:00:59.720 --> 0:01:01.600
<v Speaker 1>we'll be in with this week's cover story. In the

0:01:01.640 --> 0:01:04.840
<v Speaker 1>magazine's features section, it's all about the driverless debate are

0:01:04.920 --> 0:01:07.800
<v Speaker 1>humans better drivers than machines? For more, we turned to

0:01:07.840 --> 0:01:10.840
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg business Week columnist Max Chaffkin, along with the editor

0:01:11.080 --> 0:01:13.840
<v Speaker 1>of Business Week Joel Weber. If you go back maybe

0:01:13.840 --> 0:01:17.399
<v Speaker 1>a decade ago to ted in these conferences, you had

0:01:17.440 --> 0:01:21.319
<v Speaker 1>everyone basically going around, in particular Google, uh, kind of

0:01:21.400 --> 0:01:25.520
<v Speaker 1>leading the charge, but also lots of automakers, lots of technologists.

0:01:25.560 --> 0:01:28.160
<v Speaker 1>Basically everybody's saying, hey, you know, my kids ten and

0:01:28.400 --> 0:01:30.640
<v Speaker 1>you know they're never gonna need a driver's license. And

0:01:30.680 --> 0:01:35.120
<v Speaker 1>that really became baked almost like conventional wisdom, uh, not

0:01:35.200 --> 0:01:40.000
<v Speaker 1>just among technologists, but among policymakers, consultants everywhere. And you

0:01:40.080 --> 0:01:44.000
<v Speaker 1>saw basically about five years ago this amazing explosion of

0:01:44.080 --> 0:01:47.919
<v Speaker 1>investment um, not just Google and Cruise, but smaller companies,

0:01:48.440 --> 0:01:51.240
<v Speaker 1>basically everyone throwing billions into this field, and a lot

0:01:51.280 --> 0:01:53.200
<v Speaker 1>of those a lot of that money's gone nowhere. We've

0:01:53.240 --> 0:01:56.040
<v Speaker 1>seen a lot of stocks either crash in the case

0:01:56.040 --> 0:01:58.480
<v Speaker 1>of Aurora, which is one of these kind of bubbly

0:01:58.560 --> 0:02:01.560
<v Speaker 1>self driving companies, or you know, in the case of

0:02:01.680 --> 0:02:04.760
<v Speaker 1>coming like Zooks, which was super hyped, and then it

0:02:04.800 --> 0:02:06.960
<v Speaker 1>kind of got swallowed up by Amazon. So so it's

0:02:06.960 --> 0:02:09.200
<v Speaker 1>just been a lot of kind of um, you know,

0:02:09.240 --> 0:02:12.040
<v Speaker 1>difficulty in the industry. Okay, So one of the sources

0:02:12.080 --> 0:02:15.240
<v Speaker 1>in the story who has become something of a detractor,

0:02:15.800 --> 0:02:18.639
<v Speaker 1>uh is the name that we haven't really heard from

0:02:18.680 --> 0:02:22.440
<v Speaker 1>for a while, and that's Anthony Lewandowski. Who is Anthony Lewandowski?

0:02:22.840 --> 0:02:24.519
<v Speaker 1>And what did he have to tell you? So he is,

0:02:24.840 --> 0:02:27.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, one of the most interesting people in self

0:02:27.120 --> 0:02:29.720
<v Speaker 1>driving cars. He was for a really long time, I mean,

0:02:29.720 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>you know, leading the charge, the charge that I was

0:02:31.400 --> 0:02:33.840
<v Speaker 1>just talking about talking about how great driverless cars are

0:02:33.880 --> 0:02:36.840
<v Speaker 1>going to be. He is really the person who created

0:02:37.040 --> 0:02:39.560
<v Speaker 1>the in to the extent that one person created the

0:02:39.600 --> 0:02:43.040
<v Speaker 1>Google self driving car or even the industry, it was him.

0:02:43.639 --> 0:02:47.880
<v Speaker 1>And he went through this weird, very controversial journey. He

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:50.680
<v Speaker 1>went to uber um and then got caught up in

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:54.640
<v Speaker 1>this um massive, you know, multi billion dollar litigation over

0:02:54.800 --> 0:02:58.360
<v Speaker 1>alleged trade secrets theft, wound up with criminal charges, he

0:02:58.440 --> 0:03:00.959
<v Speaker 1>pled guilty, and then he is pardoned on the last

0:03:01.000 --> 0:03:03.560
<v Speaker 1>day of the Trump presidency. And he's kind of come

0:03:03.560 --> 0:03:08.239
<v Speaker 1>out the other end, obviously with tons of baggage. Very controversial,

0:03:08.520 --> 0:03:11.320
<v Speaker 1>but sort of saying some things out loud that I

0:03:11.360 --> 0:03:13.639
<v Speaker 1>think people in the industry were saying quietly for a

0:03:13.720 --> 0:03:16.440
<v Speaker 1>very long time, and that is this is not going

0:03:16.480 --> 0:03:18.280
<v Speaker 1>as well as we wanted it to go. What's incredible

0:03:18.320 --> 0:03:20.160
<v Speaker 1>about this guy is he's the one who sort of

0:03:20.200 --> 0:03:24.720
<v Speaker 1>created the first version of autonomous vehicle, right. He described

0:03:24.760 --> 0:03:28.000
<v Speaker 1>this situation years ago where he took a Toyota Prius

0:03:28.040 --> 0:03:31.320
<v Speaker 1>and got it to move across was it the Bay Bridge? Yeah, yeah, yeah,

0:03:31.320 --> 0:03:32.640
<v Speaker 1>and it was for It's funny, it was for a

0:03:32.680 --> 0:03:35.560
<v Speaker 1>reality show. So I mean in this kind of driverless

0:03:35.600 --> 0:03:38.160
<v Speaker 1>car world, he was sort of the scrappy entrepreneur, the

0:03:38.200 --> 0:03:40.720
<v Speaker 1>one who was kind of trying to push it to commercialize.

0:03:40.880 --> 0:03:43.360
<v Speaker 1>He took, as he said, he created a sort of

0:03:43.360 --> 0:03:46.120
<v Speaker 1>hack together a Prius, drove it across the Brave Bay Bridge,

0:03:46.320 --> 0:03:48.839
<v Speaker 1>and then that basically got swallowed up into Google became

0:03:48.840 --> 0:03:51.560
<v Speaker 1>the Google Driver. But now he's doing something that is

0:03:51.880 --> 0:03:54.360
<v Speaker 1>you could argue, is is sort of I don't know,

0:03:54.560 --> 0:03:57.080
<v Speaker 1>less complicated than that when it comes to the application

0:03:57.120 --> 0:03:59.800
<v Speaker 1>of evs, essentially using them on an industrial and that's

0:03:59.840 --> 0:04:02.000
<v Speaker 1>what one and this actually I think the part of

0:04:02.000 --> 0:04:04.840
<v Speaker 1>the article that's kind of interesting is like maybe self

0:04:04.920 --> 0:04:08.160
<v Speaker 1>driving cars do have a practical purpose, but again, it

0:04:08.200 --> 0:04:11.280
<v Speaker 1>doesn't look like what we've been told about, you know,

0:04:11.400 --> 0:04:13.880
<v Speaker 1>having a robo taxi pull up outside of your home

0:04:14.040 --> 0:04:16.520
<v Speaker 1>or driving into the office, or you doing all that

0:04:16.560 --> 0:04:19.280
<v Speaker 1>and then sending your vehicle off somewhere like run around

0:04:19.320 --> 0:04:21.400
<v Speaker 1>and make money for you all day. It actually looks

0:04:21.440 --> 0:04:23.919
<v Speaker 1>like we maybe a mining application mix. Yeah. Yeah, So

0:04:24.000 --> 0:04:27.839
<v Speaker 1>Lewandowski's company is doing what they call autonomous haulage, basically

0:04:27.960 --> 0:04:31.520
<v Speaker 1>driverless dump trucks. It sounds maybe harder than driverless cars,

0:04:31.560 --> 0:04:34.280
<v Speaker 1>but but you gotta remember these are closed sites. Uh,

0:04:34.360 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 1>these trucks are basically just going back and forth, back

0:04:36.400 --> 0:04:38.960
<v Speaker 1>and forth. I mean, they very much are like it's

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:42.200
<v Speaker 1>more like conventional robotics. And I think the one thing

0:04:42.240 --> 0:04:44.280
<v Speaker 1>that kind of opened my eyes is readiness. Thing is

0:04:44.520 --> 0:04:46.880
<v Speaker 1>there's been a lot of hype on driverless cars and

0:04:46.880 --> 0:04:49.000
<v Speaker 1>and the sort of robo taxi narrative that we all

0:04:49.040 --> 0:04:51.400
<v Speaker 1>thought was gonna be worth trillions of dollars caused Kathy

0:04:51.400 --> 0:04:54.159
<v Speaker 1>would to you know, value Tesla. You know, I don't

0:04:54.160 --> 0:04:57.000
<v Speaker 1>know in the in the many trillions of dollars um

0:04:57.080 --> 0:04:59.320
<v Speaker 1>that I think. There's a lot of questions, but there

0:04:59.320 --> 0:05:02.360
<v Speaker 1>have been A. There's been huge advances on kind of

0:05:02.400 --> 0:05:06.000
<v Speaker 1>more day to day autonomy. So we're talking about Advanced

0:05:06.040 --> 0:05:08.839
<v Speaker 1>driver Assistance a DOS, which is now like in every

0:05:08.839 --> 0:05:11.400
<v Speaker 1>new car. It's you know, dramatically changed the driving experience.

0:05:11.400 --> 0:05:13.799
<v Speaker 1>It's a big part of Elon musk strategy with Tesla.

0:05:14.080 --> 0:05:17.400
<v Speaker 1>And then we have these autonomous industrial applications what Anthony

0:05:17.480 --> 0:05:19.800
<v Speaker 1>Levandowski is doing with mining, but of course it's also

0:05:19.839 --> 0:05:22.880
<v Speaker 1>happening in agriculture. It's happening in lots of industries that

0:05:23.000 --> 0:05:24.880
<v Speaker 1>really no one's paying attention to. Can we talk about

0:05:24.880 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 1>the Derek Zulanda problem. My favorite point I've been talking

0:05:27.480 --> 0:05:30.280
<v Speaker 1>about the news room, so so self driving cars and

0:05:30.400 --> 0:05:32.200
<v Speaker 1>lots of problem. I mean, one of the challenges for

0:05:32.200 --> 0:05:34.760
<v Speaker 1>self driving cars is there all these parts of driving

0:05:35.200 --> 0:05:37.400
<v Speaker 1>that they struggle with, one of which is what the

0:05:37.440 --> 0:05:40.640
<v Speaker 1>industry calls unprotected left turn. This is a left turn

0:05:40.720 --> 0:05:43.600
<v Speaker 1>that's not um, you know, not one lane to one

0:05:43.680 --> 0:05:46.520
<v Speaker 1>lane or not with a left turn signal. And it's

0:05:46.560 --> 0:05:49.480
<v Speaker 1>kind of funny because be an anti turner any yeah, yeah,

0:05:49.520 --> 0:05:51.480
<v Speaker 1>like any normal driver just calls out a left and

0:05:51.480 --> 0:05:54.159
<v Speaker 1>it's just like Derek Zuland or kind of rebranding not

0:05:54.240 --> 0:05:56.400
<v Speaker 1>being able to turn left is like, I'm you know,

0:05:56.440 --> 0:05:58.840
<v Speaker 1>I'm not an ambi turner. Um, but I think that's

0:05:58.880 --> 0:06:00.359
<v Speaker 1>one of those jokes you have to be a certain

0:06:00.400 --> 0:06:02.880
<v Speaker 1>age to uh. I think three of the four of

0:06:02.920 --> 0:06:08.040
<v Speaker 1>us it's important, right, Like, no, no, absolutely. And it's

0:06:08.040 --> 0:06:10.200
<v Speaker 1>one of these things where you know, if you listen

0:06:10.200 --> 0:06:13.200
<v Speaker 1>to the industry, they're saying, hey, they're these edge cases,

0:06:13.200 --> 0:06:15.800
<v Speaker 1>these things nobody thinks about. And one of these things

0:06:15.880 --> 0:06:18.000
<v Speaker 1>that they are talking about is an edge case is

0:06:18.040 --> 0:06:21.680
<v Speaker 1>basically left turns so so like really like, there's just

0:06:21.760 --> 0:06:24.680
<v Speaker 1>a lot of problems that the industry has and they're

0:06:24.720 --> 0:06:29.039
<v Speaker 1>just so far away from from mastery that that I

0:06:29.040 --> 0:06:32.120
<v Speaker 1>think this this discussion we've had where people have been saying, oh,

0:06:32.160 --> 0:06:34.200
<v Speaker 1>they're the way there, they just need to get that

0:06:34.320 --> 0:06:37.400
<v Speaker 1>one more percent, it's it's I think it's very hard

0:06:37.400 --> 0:06:39.320
<v Speaker 1>to say with any kind of certainty that that's the

0:06:39.520 --> 0:06:42.160
<v Speaker 1>that's the ratio, that's the number. That was Bloomberg business

0:06:42.200 --> 0:06:44.280
<v Speaker 1>Week call him this, Max Chafkin, along with the editor

0:06:44.320 --> 0:06:47.120
<v Speaker 1>of the magazine Joel Weber, coming up how renewables could

0:06:47.160 --> 0:06:50.400
<v Speaker 1>move us closer to a clean energy future. That's next.

0:06:50.400 --> 0:07:00.520
<v Speaker 1>You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week. This is Bloomberg. This

0:07:00.920 --> 0:07:04.880
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes.

0:07:05.000 --> 0:07:09.359
<v Speaker 1>Tim Spinovik from Bloomberg Radio. Well, there was a story

0:07:09.400 --> 0:07:11.320
<v Speaker 1>on the Bloomberg this past week. It was about how

0:07:11.320 --> 0:07:15.080
<v Speaker 1>climate change made Hurricane Ian's most extreme rainfall about ten

0:07:15.600 --> 0:07:18.320
<v Speaker 1>worse than it would have been without two centuries of

0:07:18.320 --> 0:07:21.200
<v Speaker 1>greenhouse gas pollution. This is according to a first take

0:07:21.200 --> 0:07:24.240
<v Speaker 1>analysis of the storm by two US climate researchers. And

0:07:24.240 --> 0:07:26.200
<v Speaker 1>while climate change might not be on the mind of

0:07:26.200 --> 0:07:29.200
<v Speaker 1>the average energy consumer, we spoke with someone who thinks

0:07:29.240 --> 0:07:32.000
<v Speaker 1>about this stuff quite a bit. Jason Few is the

0:07:32.040 --> 0:07:35.120
<v Speaker 1>CEO of fuel Cell Energy. It's publicly traded at one

0:07:35.120 --> 0:07:38.320
<v Speaker 1>point for billion dollar market cap company. It produces units

0:07:38.360 --> 0:07:41.280
<v Speaker 1>that make electricity from hydrogen. He gave us an update

0:07:41.360 --> 0:07:43.520
<v Speaker 1>on the business as well as the concerns he sees

0:07:43.600 --> 0:07:46.480
<v Speaker 1>as we move towards a renewable future. We do two

0:07:46.520 --> 0:07:50.920
<v Speaker 1>things as a company. We decarbonized power and we produce hydrogen.

0:07:51.600 --> 0:07:54.560
<v Speaker 1>When you think about some of those concerns or areas

0:07:54.560 --> 0:07:58.120
<v Speaker 1>that you raised, you know we've had commercial available products

0:07:58.120 --> 0:08:01.360
<v Speaker 1>since two thousand and three, and in fact, our first

0:08:01.400 --> 0:08:04.480
<v Speaker 1>commercial fuel cell was sold actually in Japan to the

0:08:04.520 --> 0:08:08.400
<v Speaker 1>Cairn and Beer Company using biofuels. So, you know, it

0:08:08.480 --> 0:08:12.560
<v Speaker 1>just shows the fuel flexibility of the platform when it

0:08:12.640 --> 0:08:15.640
<v Speaker 1>comes to hydrogen and some of the concerns that you know,

0:08:15.720 --> 0:08:20.160
<v Speaker 1>get raised around hydrogen. You know, hydrogen is used widely,

0:08:20.560 --> 0:08:23.240
<v Speaker 1>you know, around the world. You know, ninety million metric

0:08:23.240 --> 0:08:25.920
<v Speaker 1>tons of year of hydrogen are used. There's some forecast

0:08:26.520 --> 0:08:30.640
<v Speaker 1>that suggests that you know, of the world's energy will

0:08:30.720 --> 0:08:34.559
<v Speaker 1>ultimately come from hydrogen, if not greater than that. We

0:08:34.679 --> 0:08:36.840
<v Speaker 1>tend to think that hydrogen is going to be an

0:08:36.880 --> 0:08:39.480
<v Speaker 1>important part of the solution, the same way we think

0:08:39.520 --> 0:08:41.960
<v Speaker 1>carbon capture will be an important part of the solution

0:08:42.280 --> 0:08:45.840
<v Speaker 1>to achieving the one and a half degree scenario in

0:08:45.960 --> 0:08:50.000
<v Speaker 1>terms of climate change itself. And and from a safety standpoint,

0:08:50.360 --> 0:08:53.320
<v Speaker 1>like I said, you know, hydrogen widely used today. It's

0:08:53.520 --> 0:08:58.199
<v Speaker 1>very safe and unlike a battery, which contains everything that

0:08:58.240 --> 0:09:01.439
<v Speaker 1>you need inside the battery to actually start a fire,

0:09:01.720 --> 0:09:04.560
<v Speaker 1>that's not the case with hydrogen. So it's actually quite today.

0:09:04.760 --> 0:09:08.280
<v Speaker 1>So why isn't adopted more widespread? Why will it maybe

0:09:08.280 --> 0:09:13.240
<v Speaker 1>only energy um production in the years to come. Why

0:09:13.280 --> 0:09:15.800
<v Speaker 1>not more Well, I think part of it is, uh

0:09:15.920 --> 0:09:19.240
<v Speaker 1>there's a cost question right in terms of this this

0:09:19.360 --> 0:09:22.360
<v Speaker 1>desire to have green hydrogen. One of the things that

0:09:22.400 --> 0:09:25.199
<v Speaker 1>I'm really excited about is the move not only in

0:09:25.240 --> 0:09:28.640
<v Speaker 1>the United States, but I'm I'm seeing in countries around

0:09:28.679 --> 0:09:31.719
<v Speaker 1>the world and the conversations we're having and in the

0:09:31.840 --> 0:09:36.040
<v Speaker 1>conversation I actually just got to participate in in Pittsburgh

0:09:36.200 --> 0:09:40.120
<v Speaker 1>with Secretary Grant Home and energy ministers from around the

0:09:40.160 --> 0:09:44.720
<v Speaker 1>world at a CEO Hydrogen roundtable, the conversation has shifted

0:09:44.760 --> 0:09:49.040
<v Speaker 1>from using colors to really talk about carbon intensity, and

0:09:49.080 --> 0:09:51.640
<v Speaker 1>I think that's one big change that's going to help

0:09:51.760 --> 0:09:56.640
<v Speaker 1>drive accelerated adoption. Another change or thing that's happening that's

0:09:56.640 --> 0:09:59.920
<v Speaker 1>going to help drive adoption is the work that you're

0:10:00.000 --> 0:10:01.800
<v Speaker 1>scene that's going to get done as a result of

0:10:01.840 --> 0:10:03.840
<v Speaker 1>the i ra A in the United States. You have

0:10:03.920 --> 0:10:07.800
<v Speaker 1>similar legislation in markets like Korea and Japan and across

0:10:07.880 --> 0:10:11.480
<v Speaker 1>the EU. And we've seen this movie play out before.

0:10:11.880 --> 0:10:16.360
<v Speaker 1>We saw how incentives, whether it's I t C, production

0:10:16.440 --> 0:10:19.240
<v Speaker 1>tax credits, those kind of things really helped drive the

0:10:19.320 --> 0:10:23.080
<v Speaker 1>cost curve down. We're gonna see that same thing happen

0:10:23.640 --> 0:10:27.480
<v Speaker 1>with fuel cells and with hydrogen as an effective way

0:10:27.520 --> 0:10:31.400
<v Speaker 1>to get us to the cost that everyone's targeting, you know,

0:10:31.440 --> 0:10:34.839
<v Speaker 1>which is you know, as low as a dollar a

0:10:34.920 --> 0:10:38.120
<v Speaker 1>kilogram for hydrogen, and that's going to make it highly competitive.

0:10:38.200 --> 0:10:41.240
<v Speaker 1>And I think as you look around the world today

0:10:41.280 --> 0:10:45.040
<v Speaker 1>and you're seeing increased energy prices, those sparks spreads are narrowing,

0:10:45.559 --> 0:10:47.680
<v Speaker 1>uh and and so I think you're gonna see adoption

0:10:47.800 --> 0:10:52.280
<v Speaker 1>start to accelerate with hydrogen as one of the answers

0:10:52.320 --> 0:10:55.360
<v Speaker 1>to solving this climate crisis we have today. From an

0:10:55.360 --> 0:10:58.680
<v Speaker 1>infrastructure perspective, when it comes to generating power, explain to

0:10:58.760 --> 0:11:01.920
<v Speaker 1>us how you take a hility and allow it to

0:11:02.040 --> 0:11:06.359
<v Speaker 1>create power using hydrogen using fuel cells versus using fossil fuels.

0:11:06.400 --> 0:11:09.760
<v Speaker 1>So when you think about an input fuel and you

0:11:09.800 --> 0:11:14.080
<v Speaker 1>think about hydrogen, hydrogen just becomes the input fuel that

0:11:14.240 --> 0:11:17.720
<v Speaker 1>we would be using with our solid oxide platform for instance,

0:11:18.040 --> 0:11:20.839
<v Speaker 1>in which we would take that hydrogen and we use

0:11:20.880 --> 0:11:25.640
<v Speaker 1>that hydrogen as the feedstock to create electricity. That hydrogen

0:11:26.280 --> 0:11:30.560
<v Speaker 1>interacts with the fuel cell, right, and and the chemistry

0:11:30.600 --> 0:11:34.120
<v Speaker 1>that we use in this case of solid oxide technology

0:11:34.520 --> 0:11:38.600
<v Speaker 1>to produce that power. And if that hydrogen was produced

0:11:38.600 --> 0:11:43.800
<v Speaker 1>by you know, a zero carbon source of electricity, let's

0:11:43.800 --> 0:11:47.439
<v Speaker 1>say you're using electrolysis, so you're taking electricity and water

0:11:47.600 --> 0:11:50.720
<v Speaker 1>and you're converting into hydrogen. Then you're using that hydrogen

0:11:50.800 --> 0:11:56.040
<v Speaker 1>to produce power. That hydrogen has zero carbon intensity, then

0:11:56.080 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>the power being produced from our platform is zero carbon.

0:12:00.320 --> 0:12:03.800
<v Speaker 1>But we also have the ability to use blended hydrogen

0:12:03.840 --> 0:12:06.840
<v Speaker 1>and natural gas, for example, which even lowers you know,

0:12:06.880 --> 0:12:10.000
<v Speaker 1>the carbon intensity of the fuel in that case. But

0:12:10.280 --> 0:12:15.120
<v Speaker 1>in all cases, whether it's hydrogen, renewmal natural gas, or

0:12:15.120 --> 0:12:18.440
<v Speaker 1>bio fuels, that serves as the input fuel that the

0:12:18.480 --> 0:12:23.319
<v Speaker 1>fuel cell needs to then convert that to power, whether

0:12:23.360 --> 0:12:26.800
<v Speaker 1>it's for the grid or for a commercial industrial customer,

0:12:26.920 --> 0:12:29.760
<v Speaker 1>UH and delivering that power as a as a product.

0:12:30.000 --> 0:12:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm curious, Jason about the business and the business outlook

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:36.000
<v Speaker 1>and the growth. And I know earlier this month you

0:12:36.080 --> 0:12:38.960
<v Speaker 1>came out with your latest update quarterly update. I think

0:12:38.960 --> 0:12:40.960
<v Speaker 1>there was a wider than expected loss for the quarter,

0:12:41.000 --> 0:12:44.560
<v Speaker 1>strongest quarterly revenue in five years. UM and you guys

0:12:44.559 --> 0:12:47.720
<v Speaker 1>talked about an increase in marketing and consulting costs because

0:12:47.840 --> 0:12:52.160
<v Speaker 1>you had raised headcount for rebranding, accelerated and accelerating your

0:12:52.200 --> 0:12:55.280
<v Speaker 1>sales and commercialization efforts. Give us some more color if

0:12:55.280 --> 0:12:58.320
<v Speaker 1>you will in terms of the business who's buying you

0:12:58.320 --> 0:13:01.439
<v Speaker 1>guys have custom are certainly in the energy space and

0:13:01.480 --> 0:13:03.600
<v Speaker 1>the corporate space, but give us an idea of where

0:13:03.640 --> 0:13:06.600
<v Speaker 1>the growth is coming from from your business. So are

0:13:06.760 --> 0:13:11.280
<v Speaker 1>the customers that we target largely cut across the utility

0:13:11.320 --> 0:13:15.160
<v Speaker 1>sector where we're providing grid based power, and we might

0:13:15.200 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 1>be providing that power purely is just a power resource

0:13:19.360 --> 0:13:22.000
<v Speaker 1>on the grid, or we might be providing that power

0:13:22.520 --> 0:13:25.360
<v Speaker 1>and using the thermal energy where we might be connected

0:13:25.400 --> 0:13:27.920
<v Speaker 1>to a district heating system and we're providing that thermal

0:13:28.000 --> 0:13:30.840
<v Speaker 1>energy in addition to the power. Or we might be

0:13:30.880 --> 0:13:34.840
<v Speaker 1>in an in a microgrid configuration where we're providing power

0:13:34.880 --> 0:13:37.440
<v Speaker 1>to the grid and in the power outage, we go

0:13:37.480 --> 0:13:40.320
<v Speaker 1>into what we refer to as island mode and we

0:13:40.400 --> 0:13:43.640
<v Speaker 1>provide power to a dedicated set of resources, keeping those

0:13:43.679 --> 0:13:49.720
<v Speaker 1>critical resources powered while the grid is down. We also

0:13:49.760 --> 0:13:53.240
<v Speaker 1>serve commercial and industrial customers, and in many of those cases,

0:13:53.280 --> 0:13:57.280
<v Speaker 1>we're providing power to those customers, and again we might

0:13:57.320 --> 0:14:00.920
<v Speaker 1>be providing the thermal energy such that the using steam

0:14:01.000 --> 0:14:04.880
<v Speaker 1>from our platform in their manufacturing process. And we also

0:14:04.920 --> 0:14:08.520
<v Speaker 1>have the ability to do things like provide carbon to

0:14:08.600 --> 0:14:12.359
<v Speaker 1>those customers. So when you think about carbonated beverage companies,

0:14:12.679 --> 0:14:16.000
<v Speaker 1>are you think about food processing where carbon is really

0:14:16.040 --> 0:14:20.920
<v Speaker 1>important to not only processing proteins, but then extending shelf

0:14:21.000 --> 0:14:25.840
<v Speaker 1>like by keeping those proteins shield. Those are always in

0:14:25.880 --> 0:14:28.640
<v Speaker 1>which we leverage our platform to deliver value to our

0:14:28.640 --> 0:14:33.280
<v Speaker 1>customers in addition to hydrogen, and we're building projects for Toyota.

0:14:33.360 --> 0:14:37.120
<v Speaker 1>Today we will deliver hydrogen to Toyota power and water

0:14:37.320 --> 0:14:39.360
<v Speaker 1>all from the same platform at the Port of Wana

0:14:39.360 --> 0:14:42.320
<v Speaker 1>Beach in California. That was fuel Cell CEO Jason Few

0:14:42.520 --> 0:14:45.200
<v Speaker 1>Still ahead on Bloomberg Business Week. Another company looking to

0:14:45.240 --> 0:14:48.320
<v Speaker 1>help combat climate change by partnering with retailers to keep

0:14:48.400 --> 0:14:52.120
<v Speaker 1>excess packaging out of landfills. That's coming up next. This

0:14:52.360 --> 0:15:00.880
<v Speaker 1>is Bloomberg Broadcasting from the financial capital of the World

0:15:01.000 --> 0:15:04.440
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Love Rio in New York to Washington, d C.

0:15:04.640 --> 0:15:09.359
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg to Boston, Bloomberg one O six one to San Francisco,

0:15:09.400 --> 0:15:12.880
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg nine six to the country Sirius XM Channer one

0:15:12.960 --> 0:15:16.680
<v Speaker 1>nineteen and around the globe the Bloomberg Business and Bloomberg

0:15:16.760 --> 0:15:20.840
<v Speaker 1>Radio dot Com. This is Bloomberg Business Week with Carol

0:15:20.920 --> 0:15:26.760
<v Speaker 1>Messer and Bloomberg Quick takes Tim Stenovin on Bloomberg Radio. Well,

0:15:26.760 --> 0:15:29.080
<v Speaker 1>in vision a world where every time a consumer buys

0:15:29.080 --> 0:15:32.240
<v Speaker 1>an item, they put another item back into the economy,

0:15:32.760 --> 0:15:36.600
<v Speaker 1>not a landfill, and the transaction produces little to no waste,

0:15:36.840 --> 0:15:39.240
<v Speaker 1>seem impossible. While we spoke with the founder of a

0:15:39.280 --> 0:15:42.200
<v Speaker 1>company that is doing just that. We're talking about Nate Faust.

0:15:42.280 --> 0:15:45.000
<v Speaker 1>He's the founder of Olive. It's an e commerce business

0:15:45.240 --> 0:15:47.840
<v Speaker 1>with a mission to reduce waste from online shopping. He

0:15:47.920 --> 0:15:50.000
<v Speaker 1>might be a familiar name to you if you follow

0:15:50.080 --> 0:15:53.240
<v Speaker 1>the industry well for the last decade. He who was

0:15:53.280 --> 0:15:55.360
<v Speaker 1>the co founder of jet. It was sold to Walmart

0:15:55.400 --> 0:15:58.600
<v Speaker 1>back in sixteen for a cool three point three billion dollars.

0:15:58.600 --> 0:16:00.720
<v Speaker 1>It was the largest U. S. E commer acquisition at

0:16:00.720 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 1>the time. Before that, he actually founded Quidsy dot com.

0:16:04.520 --> 0:16:06.680
<v Speaker 1>That was diapers dot com. He did that also along

0:16:06.720 --> 0:16:09.280
<v Speaker 1>with Mark Laurie. So already a few success He knows

0:16:09.280 --> 0:16:11.120
<v Speaker 1>the thing are too this is maybe this is like

0:16:11.160 --> 0:16:14.920
<v Speaker 1>retirement project exactly. Well, anyway, he explained the story behind

0:16:14.920 --> 0:16:17.400
<v Speaker 1>the company and how he expects the e commerce delivery

0:16:17.400 --> 0:16:21.640
<v Speaker 1>experience to evolve. That's really what started this whole journey

0:16:21.920 --> 0:16:25.000
<v Speaker 1>was just the frustration of of dealing with breaking down

0:16:25.040 --> 0:16:28.880
<v Speaker 1>boxes and all the trips up and down my driveway

0:16:29.000 --> 0:16:32.040
<v Speaker 1>and the epiphany that this this isn't how it has

0:16:32.280 --> 0:16:37.480
<v Speaker 1>to be. It's you know, incredibly inconvenient both for customers

0:16:37.560 --> 0:16:42.680
<v Speaker 1>and for the environment. And so what we've built at

0:16:42.720 --> 0:16:47.360
<v Speaker 1>olive to address that is really a closed loop system

0:16:47.360 --> 0:16:51.400
<v Speaker 1>where we partner with brands and retailers to deliver their

0:16:51.400 --> 0:16:56.000
<v Speaker 1>customer orders in reuse packaging that we pick up from

0:16:56.040 --> 0:17:01.120
<v Speaker 1>their doorsteps, along with any returns. And to really further

0:17:01.200 --> 0:17:04.960
<v Speaker 1>that circularity model, not only do we eliminate all that

0:17:05.040 --> 0:17:09.000
<v Speaker 1>packaging waste, but when we pick that up, consumers also

0:17:09.040 --> 0:17:12.600
<v Speaker 1>have the opportunity to drop in us clothes that we

0:17:12.720 --> 0:17:15.040
<v Speaker 1>then sell on their behalf, so that we keep them

0:17:15.280 --> 0:17:19.600
<v Speaker 1>out of landfills and increase the circularity of goods and

0:17:19.680 --> 0:17:22.359
<v Speaker 1>multiple uses along with the circularity of packaging. You know,

0:17:22.400 --> 0:17:24.560
<v Speaker 1>I think it's been more than a year year or

0:17:24.560 --> 0:17:26.320
<v Speaker 1>so since we last checked in with you, So tell

0:17:26.400 --> 0:17:29.439
<v Speaker 1>us about what's the update in terms of your business,

0:17:29.840 --> 0:17:32.119
<v Speaker 1>the volume that pick up, the usage and love some

0:17:32.200 --> 0:17:34.920
<v Speaker 1>insight on that. Since last time we spoke, we did

0:17:35.040 --> 0:17:39.480
<v Speaker 1>make a pretty significant shift in our business from a

0:17:39.640 --> 0:17:43.320
<v Speaker 1>business to consumer model through a business to business model.

0:17:43.480 --> 0:17:47.720
<v Speaker 1>You know, previously we had an offering where you could

0:17:47.760 --> 0:17:50.600
<v Speaker 1>basically order from a bunch of places that stuff would

0:17:50.600 --> 0:17:53.280
<v Speaker 1>come to us, we'd combine it for you into a

0:17:53.359 --> 0:17:57.119
<v Speaker 1>single weekly packaging and reusable packaging. But we actually had

0:17:57.160 --> 0:18:00.440
<v Speaker 1>a lot of our early brand partners saying, oh my gosh,

0:18:00.440 --> 0:18:03.440
<v Speaker 1>our customers love this. Could you just provide this experience

0:18:03.480 --> 0:18:07.800
<v Speaker 1>directly for us? And so we pivoted to a A

0:18:07.840 --> 0:18:10.920
<v Speaker 1>B two B model where now we work directly with

0:18:11.000 --> 0:18:16.399
<v Speaker 1>brands and Olive waste free delivery is a ship method

0:18:16.520 --> 0:18:20.160
<v Speaker 1>that shows up at checkout and you know, we're still

0:18:20.480 --> 0:18:24.600
<v Speaker 1>early on, but you know, we're doing several thousand deliveries

0:18:24.840 --> 0:18:28.639
<v Speaker 1>and pickups a week just in the New York metro area,

0:18:28.960 --> 0:18:32.359
<v Speaker 1>and you know, smattering of of other pickups across the

0:18:32.400 --> 0:18:35.640
<v Speaker 1>rest of the country, but with a big focus on

0:18:35.680 --> 0:18:38.840
<v Speaker 1>the New York market at the moment. How do you

0:18:38.880 --> 0:18:41.600
<v Speaker 1>scale this? How do you get it beyond fashion and

0:18:42.119 --> 0:18:45.119
<v Speaker 1>and get it beyond clothing. It really just comes down

0:18:45.160 --> 0:18:50.639
<v Speaker 1>to volume, and the greater scale of the supply chain,

0:18:51.480 --> 0:18:56.680
<v Speaker 1>the greater the ability to move through products that might

0:18:56.760 --> 0:19:02.280
<v Speaker 1>have you know, slightly lower rees values, but It really

0:19:02.320 --> 0:19:08.440
<v Speaker 1>just comes down to synchronizing that delivery and pick up

0:19:08.720 --> 0:19:13.200
<v Speaker 1>such that there's no incremental cost getting those used goods

0:19:13.680 --> 0:19:18.960
<v Speaker 1>out of people's homes and up for sale in secondhand markets.

0:19:19.160 --> 0:19:24.320
<v Speaker 1>So have you had a conversation with Amazon um there,

0:19:24.440 --> 0:19:29.480
<v Speaker 1>that's obviously the biggest e commerce player there is. I

0:19:29.520 --> 0:19:33.639
<v Speaker 1>love to one day be able to address all um

0:19:33.880 --> 0:19:37.720
<v Speaker 1>you know, e commerce categories, but right now we're more

0:19:37.760 --> 0:19:42.000
<v Speaker 1>focused on mid sized apparel. I was being a little silly,

0:19:42.040 --> 0:19:44.399
<v Speaker 1>but I do think about, you know, and as consumers,

0:19:44.400 --> 0:19:47.520
<v Speaker 1>I increasingly am thinking about, you know, I don't need

0:19:47.560 --> 0:19:49.840
<v Speaker 1>to get everything tomorrow. I don't need to get everything

0:19:49.880 --> 0:19:53.040
<v Speaker 1>in five million boxes. And I do wonder, as you

0:19:53.040 --> 0:19:56.400
<v Speaker 1>guys move along, how are you measuring that you are

0:19:56.480 --> 0:20:00.800
<v Speaker 1>indeed lowering carbon emissions by what you are doing. We're

0:20:00.880 --> 0:20:04.359
<v Speaker 1>actually in this new model putting there the data so

0:20:04.400 --> 0:20:07.560
<v Speaker 1>that we can perform a study similar to the one

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:10.960
<v Speaker 1>that we had started in the prior B two S model,

0:20:11.040 --> 0:20:15.440
<v Speaker 1>where that was more about the consolidation and the reduction

0:20:15.760 --> 0:20:19.640
<v Speaker 1>of the sort of last mile stops. And in that

0:20:19.680 --> 0:20:22.199
<v Speaker 1>first version, we weren't actually eliminating a lot of the

0:20:22.200 --> 0:20:25.719
<v Speaker 1>packaging because we were intercepting it and consolidating it. In

0:20:25.880 --> 0:20:31.679
<v Speaker 1>this new model, we're elimiting the packaging and we're also

0:20:32.000 --> 0:20:34.520
<v Speaker 1>with the driving the circularity of the goods having a

0:20:34.560 --> 0:20:38.440
<v Speaker 1>significant sustainability impact. And so we're getting close to kicking

0:20:38.480 --> 0:20:42.600
<v Speaker 1>off that study to really measure our our end end impact.

0:20:42.680 --> 0:20:45.399
<v Speaker 1>I think thanks to Olive founder net Fast, you're listening

0:20:45.440 --> 0:20:48.080
<v Speaker 1>to Bloomberg business Week for e commerce to e learning

0:20:48.160 --> 0:20:51.280
<v Speaker 1>as an iconic on seventy eight year old publishing company

0:20:51.320 --> 0:21:01.200
<v Speaker 1>continues to delve deeper into digital. This is Bloomberg. You're

0:21:01.240 --> 0:21:05.159
<v Speaker 1>listening to Bloomberg Business Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg

0:21:05.240 --> 0:21:10.639
<v Speaker 1>Quick Takes Tim Stinovic from Bloomberg Radio. According to a

0:21:10.680 --> 0:21:13.280
<v Speaker 1>report out late last year by Research Dive, the global

0:21:13.320 --> 0:21:17.040
<v Speaker 1>digital educational publishing market is predicted to garner a revenue

0:21:17.080 --> 0:21:21.520
<v Speaker 1>of nearly twenty eight billion dollars by seven. That's growing

0:21:21.600 --> 0:21:24.680
<v Speaker 1>rapidly at a compound annual growth rate of se to

0:21:24.760 --> 0:21:29.280
<v Speaker 1>him from during the forecast period. So that's seven, so

0:21:29.280 --> 0:21:32.359
<v Speaker 1>pretty rapid. Yeah, it's happening really really quickly. For some

0:21:32.400 --> 0:21:34.640
<v Speaker 1>thoughts on the industry and strategies for growth, we spoke

0:21:34.680 --> 0:21:37.560
<v Speaker 1>to Andy Bird. He's the CEO of Pearson, and prior

0:21:37.600 --> 0:21:40.560
<v Speaker 1>to that he was president and chairman of Walt Disney International.

0:21:40.840 --> 0:21:43.320
<v Speaker 1>He spent fourteen years at the company. Yeah, this was

0:21:43.359 --> 0:21:46.320
<v Speaker 1>a fun conversation. We began by asking him though about

0:21:46.320 --> 0:21:50.479
<v Speaker 1>the macro economic landscape and what he sees going forward.

0:21:50.800 --> 0:21:54.720
<v Speaker 1>It's very chaotic out there. I think there is a

0:21:54.800 --> 0:21:58.719
<v Speaker 1>flight quality certainly were seeing that. You know, we're listed

0:21:58.720 --> 0:22:01.000
<v Speaker 1>on the foot Sea and in London and we were

0:22:01.000 --> 0:22:03.960
<v Speaker 1>actually the best performing company for the first half of

0:22:03.960 --> 0:22:07.600
<v Speaker 1>this year. And I think that's down to the resilience

0:22:07.640 --> 0:22:10.760
<v Speaker 1>of what we do, not just the necessarily the sector

0:22:10.800 --> 0:22:13.520
<v Speaker 1>we're in, but but the range of businesses were in.

0:22:13.520 --> 0:22:16.040
<v Speaker 1>In the resilience of our business. And I think, you know,

0:22:16.119 --> 0:22:20.280
<v Speaker 1>the days of free money being over, um, you know,

0:22:20.480 --> 0:22:22.480
<v Speaker 1>it's starting to have an impact. I think, you know,

0:22:22.600 --> 0:22:26.240
<v Speaker 1>those days over are just paused. I'm not sure they're

0:22:26.240 --> 0:22:29.080
<v Speaker 1>going to come back to the you know, to the

0:22:29.119 --> 0:22:32.160
<v Speaker 1>recent past very quickly. I'm not I'm not so certain.

0:22:32.280 --> 0:22:36.400
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, in many ways, the last decade

0:22:36.480 --> 0:22:39.520
<v Speaker 1>or so, which we've all got used to, was somewhat abnormal.

0:22:39.560 --> 0:22:42.159
<v Speaker 1>If you look on a much longer time horizon, you know,

0:22:42.200 --> 0:22:44.440
<v Speaker 1>we all used to pay interest rates sort of around

0:22:44.600 --> 0:22:47.640
<v Speaker 1>mortgage rates. You know, I can remember paying mortgage rates

0:22:47.680 --> 0:22:50.480
<v Speaker 1>were very similar to what they were today, but certainly

0:22:50.520 --> 0:22:53.840
<v Speaker 1>we got used to free money and and and I

0:22:54.080 --> 0:22:55.880
<v Speaker 1>also see that about you know, and we see this

0:22:56.200 --> 0:23:00.440
<v Speaker 1>in terms of investor interest in in in person is like, oh, wow,

0:23:00.480 --> 0:23:04.080
<v Speaker 1>you're a real company with real sales and real cash

0:23:04.119 --> 0:23:08.080
<v Speaker 1>flow and real profits. Wow, well, Andy, talk about your

0:23:08.080 --> 0:23:12.480
<v Speaker 1>business right educational or like how resilient is it to recessions?

0:23:12.480 --> 0:23:17.639
<v Speaker 1>We're actually counter cyclical historically, whether it's inflation, unemployment. You know,

0:23:17.720 --> 0:23:20.920
<v Speaker 1>people turn. You see college admissions go up, for example.

0:23:22.240 --> 0:23:24.679
<v Speaker 1>You know. The other the other thing about Pierson is

0:23:24.720 --> 0:23:27.920
<v Speaker 1>that we're a lot more than educational textbook. You know.

0:23:28.040 --> 0:23:31.320
<v Speaker 1>I think what's unique about the business is we and

0:23:31.400 --> 0:23:34.879
<v Speaker 1>what attracted me to the business and your referenced you know,

0:23:34.960 --> 0:23:37.639
<v Speaker 1>Disney in many ways. When I came, I joined the

0:23:37.640 --> 0:23:41.760
<v Speaker 1>board of Pierson before I became CEO. And you know,

0:23:41.800 --> 0:23:45.080
<v Speaker 1>it's this continuum from the creation of intellectual property, which

0:23:45.080 --> 0:23:47.240
<v Speaker 1>we do. Used to be the form of a textbook,

0:23:47.240 --> 0:23:50.639
<v Speaker 1>it's now digital. That's I find a very interesting area

0:23:51.040 --> 0:23:55.280
<v Speaker 1>all the way through assessments and ultimately to certification, verification,

0:23:55.320 --> 0:23:57.920
<v Speaker 1>and we're seeing you know, the world move to you know,

0:23:58.119 --> 0:24:01.400
<v Speaker 1>skills based learning. You know this this notion of how

0:24:01.440 --> 0:24:05.960
<v Speaker 1>you redefine higher education. Well, let's go there, because Tim

0:24:06.000 --> 0:24:07.760
<v Speaker 1>and I have a lot of conversations and even with

0:24:07.880 --> 0:24:11.280
<v Speaker 1>heads of colleges universities who are also thinking, like I

0:24:11.280 --> 0:24:13.159
<v Speaker 1>don't know if the four year program makes anymore our

0:24:13.200 --> 0:24:16.199
<v Speaker 1>former heads and I do wonder are you seeing signs

0:24:16.320 --> 0:24:19.720
<v Speaker 1>increasingly where that model is kind of coming and done,

0:24:19.920 --> 0:24:22.879
<v Speaker 1>or people are going and getting maybe an associates or

0:24:22.880 --> 0:24:25.520
<v Speaker 1>a couple of years going to work, coming back, going

0:24:25.560 --> 0:24:28.720
<v Speaker 1>for other certifications. What insight can you tell us about that?

0:24:29.240 --> 0:24:32.880
<v Speaker 1>I mean it, we're currently in the back to school period,

0:24:32.960 --> 0:24:37.159
<v Speaker 1>and we'll have enrollment data for for this season in

0:24:37.600 --> 0:24:40.320
<v Speaker 1>four or five weeks time, and so we'll have a

0:24:40.320 --> 0:24:42.320
<v Speaker 1>better picture then. Certainly, the last couple of years has

0:24:42.320 --> 0:24:47.000
<v Speaker 1>seen declines in US higher ed college enrollments. How much

0:24:47.040 --> 0:24:50.440
<v Speaker 1>of that was cyclical or driven through by the pandemic,

0:24:50.600 --> 0:24:52.879
<v Speaker 1>how much of it is is a permanent you know,

0:24:52.920 --> 0:24:56.000
<v Speaker 1>I I tend to think of it in the following

0:24:56.040 --> 0:25:00.520
<v Speaker 1>ways that you know, when I graduated from high school,

0:25:00.560 --> 0:25:03.440
<v Speaker 1>if I wanted to further my higher education, I only

0:25:03.440 --> 0:25:06.560
<v Speaker 1>had one door to go through that was university or college.

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:10.720
<v Speaker 1>Now there's two. You know, there's enterprise learning and there's

0:25:10.800 --> 0:25:13.320
<v Speaker 1>institutional learning. And I've I've said in the pat I

0:25:13.320 --> 0:25:16.520
<v Speaker 1>think some of the biggest universities in the world arguably

0:25:16.560 --> 0:25:20.920
<v Speaker 1>now our institutions. You look what Amazon is doing, for example,

0:25:21.400 --> 0:25:23.639
<v Speaker 1>you know where if you're working, if you're one of

0:25:23.680 --> 0:25:26.600
<v Speaker 1>their one million workers in a fulfillment warehouse, you know,

0:25:26.840 --> 0:25:29.560
<v Speaker 1>Amazon will pay for your college education. And that I

0:25:29.600 --> 0:25:32.600
<v Speaker 1>think also plays into this hybrid mix of two year

0:25:32.720 --> 0:25:36.920
<v Speaker 1>versus four year, the role of community colleges in the mix,

0:25:37.359 --> 0:25:40.399
<v Speaker 1>saying if you're a barrista at Starbucks, you know, this

0:25:40.600 --> 0:25:45.399
<v Speaker 1>notion of an individual understanding the importance of learning and

0:25:45.480 --> 0:25:48.960
<v Speaker 1>the way that now technology allows us to deliver learning.

0:25:49.560 --> 0:25:51.720
<v Speaker 1>I think it's going to have a profound impact. I

0:25:51.760 --> 0:25:54.119
<v Speaker 1>think we're just at the start of a quite frankly

0:25:54.160 --> 0:25:56.359
<v Speaker 1>a revolution. We want to talk more about what you're

0:25:56.359 --> 0:25:58.080
<v Speaker 1>doing here a Pierson, but we were just talking about

0:25:58.119 --> 0:26:00.879
<v Speaker 1>Disney a little bit. How do you think about that

0:26:00.920 --> 0:26:03.840
<v Speaker 1>company the impact has had on you as how you

0:26:03.920 --> 0:26:05.920
<v Speaker 1>think about what you want to do at Pierson talked

0:26:05.920 --> 0:26:07.760
<v Speaker 1>to us a little bit about at that time it

0:26:07.960 --> 0:26:11.560
<v Speaker 1>had a profound impact on my life and my family's life.

0:26:11.720 --> 0:26:15.160
<v Speaker 1>I moved from the UK to Los Angeles. I had

0:26:15.200 --> 0:26:20.080
<v Speaker 1>the you know, the immense good fortune to work for

0:26:20.119 --> 0:26:25.159
<v Speaker 1>Bob Iger for those fourteen years and really, you know,

0:26:25.280 --> 0:26:28.199
<v Speaker 1>be part of a transformation which is very similar to

0:26:28.240 --> 0:26:30.160
<v Speaker 1>what we're doing it Piers, and from you know, back

0:26:30.160 --> 0:26:32.359
<v Speaker 1>in two thousand and to two thousand three when I

0:26:32.440 --> 0:26:36.840
<v Speaker 1>joined Disney, and you know, Disney start was twelve bucks

0:26:36.880 --> 0:26:40.600
<v Speaker 1>something and change. People sometimes forget that, and you know,

0:26:41.080 --> 0:26:43.639
<v Speaker 1>the journey from the acquisition of Pixar and Marvel to

0:26:43.800 --> 0:26:48.200
<v Speaker 1>Lucas and beyond. When I joined the Border Pierson, I went, wow,

0:26:48.720 --> 0:26:52.000
<v Speaker 1>there's so many similarities with this company and Disney. But

0:26:52.080 --> 0:26:55.760
<v Speaker 1>whereas Disney as the world's leading entertainment company, you know,

0:26:55.960 --> 0:26:59.760
<v Speaker 1>Pierson can become the world leading learning company. So let's

0:26:59.840 --> 0:27:02.000
<v Speaker 1>keep the comparison going. If you look at the way

0:27:02.000 --> 0:27:06.040
<v Speaker 1>that Disney transformed itself into a company that has really

0:27:06.080 --> 0:27:09.600
<v Speaker 1>been a powerhouse over well the last decade more so

0:27:09.680 --> 0:27:12.800
<v Speaker 1>than at any other time, with theme parks and the

0:27:12.800 --> 0:27:16.760
<v Speaker 1>acquisition of Lucasfilm and other companies that have done really

0:27:16.760 --> 0:27:19.560
<v Speaker 1>well for it um in transition to streaming as well.

0:27:20.160 --> 0:27:21.879
<v Speaker 1>How do you take what you learned at Disney and

0:27:21.920 --> 0:27:24.680
<v Speaker 1>apply that at Pearson for its own transformation. So that

0:27:24.800 --> 0:27:27.600
<v Speaker 1>at the heart of both companies is intellectual property. I

0:27:27.640 --> 0:27:32.679
<v Speaker 1>think that is so powerful and we content content is

0:27:33.440 --> 0:27:35.399
<v Speaker 1>so so important, and so that and the heart of

0:27:35.480 --> 0:27:38.919
<v Speaker 1>Pierson is intellectual property. You know, it's it used to

0:27:38.920 --> 0:27:42.840
<v Speaker 1>take the form of textbooks. It's now far more interactive.

0:27:42.920 --> 0:27:47.520
<v Speaker 1>You it's vis video, graphics, audio, who are talking about

0:27:47.560 --> 0:27:49.960
<v Speaker 1>the ways that you can ultimately it will go into

0:27:50.040 --> 0:27:54.000
<v Speaker 1>virtual reality, in the metaverse and beyond the way that

0:27:54.119 --> 0:27:59.399
<v Speaker 1>technology is allowing the delivery of learning experiences is radically changing.

0:27:59.400 --> 0:28:01.480
<v Speaker 1>And at the heart of our company is you know,

0:28:01.520 --> 0:28:05.840
<v Speaker 1>we have over five thousand authors. You create a content creators,

0:28:07.080 --> 0:28:09.919
<v Speaker 1>we have that learning ecosystem, and then you start to

0:28:10.440 --> 0:28:13.320
<v Speaker 1>put that out with distribution, the ability for us now

0:28:13.560 --> 0:28:16.560
<v Speaker 1>to go direct to a consumer, you know, with the

0:28:16.680 --> 0:28:19.800
<v Speaker 1>you know, we launched person plus for US college students

0:28:19.840 --> 0:28:22.000
<v Speaker 1>twelve months ago and in twelve months got four and

0:28:22.040 --> 0:28:25.720
<v Speaker 1>a half million registered users. Yeah, that's not many start

0:28:25.800 --> 0:28:29.520
<v Speaker 1>ups do that, right, So, how does you mentioned metaverse?

0:28:29.680 --> 0:28:31.800
<v Speaker 1>It's going to be difficult as they transition to metaverse.

0:28:31.840 --> 0:28:34.640
<v Speaker 1>It's not an easy transition, not everybody's buying in. Investors

0:28:34.640 --> 0:28:37.600
<v Speaker 1>certainly are How do you think about things like the metaverse?

0:28:37.640 --> 0:28:39.520
<v Speaker 1>How do you plan for it today when there's still

0:28:39.520 --> 0:28:41.480
<v Speaker 1>so many questions? How do you think about things like

0:28:41.720 --> 0:28:44.640
<v Speaker 1>n f T s and that probably plays to content

0:28:44.840 --> 0:28:48.160
<v Speaker 1>right in proprietary Yes, yes, you know in a way

0:28:48.240 --> 0:28:51.040
<v Speaker 1>if you break down, deconstruct the textbook, which are able

0:28:51.040 --> 0:28:53.960
<v Speaker 1>to do now, and think about learning modules rather than

0:28:54.080 --> 0:28:57.560
<v Speaker 1>chapters of text. They can be pieces of audio, pieces

0:28:57.600 --> 0:29:01.520
<v Speaker 1>of video, and if you meant each of those to

0:29:01.680 --> 0:29:05.040
<v Speaker 1>ensure that the author of that, the creator of that content,

0:29:05.280 --> 0:29:09.479
<v Speaker 1>and by placing on blockchain, gets paid appropriately throughout its life.

0:29:09.880 --> 0:29:12.360
<v Speaker 1>Do you need the blockchain to do that? No, but

0:29:12.440 --> 0:29:14.960
<v Speaker 1>the blockchain makes it a lot easier. So it's really

0:29:15.160 --> 0:29:19.280
<v Speaker 1>realties are really complex. So this this actually simplifies the right. Yes,

0:29:19.360 --> 0:29:22.240
<v Speaker 1>it's because I have yet to I'll be honest with you,

0:29:22.280 --> 0:29:25.040
<v Speaker 1>I've yet to hear a very compelling case for the

0:29:25.080 --> 0:29:28.120
<v Speaker 1>blockchain loyalty. Can I get blockchain more than I get

0:29:28.160 --> 0:29:29.960
<v Speaker 1>some other Yeah? Yeah, But I mean, you know, this

0:29:30.000 --> 0:29:31.880
<v Speaker 1>technology has been around for more than a dozen years.

0:29:31.880 --> 0:29:33.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, how has it actually made our lives? Well?

0:29:33.360 --> 0:29:36.120
<v Speaker 1>I think it gets crowded or clouded rather by the

0:29:36.120 --> 0:29:43.160
<v Speaker 1>whole crypto noise. But under the crypto okay, I mean

0:29:43.360 --> 0:29:45.800
<v Speaker 1>I would say skeptic too. I'm very interested in that.

0:29:46.360 --> 0:29:48.280
<v Speaker 1>But but then you know, if you think and you

0:29:48.360 --> 0:29:51.840
<v Speaker 1>move forward and you think of learning and technology, virtual

0:29:51.880 --> 0:29:55.800
<v Speaker 1>reality and everything like that, that plays right into learning.

0:29:56.040 --> 0:29:58.160
<v Speaker 1>But you can't make bet today. I like the metaverse.

0:29:58.560 --> 0:30:01.240
<v Speaker 1>But you can be curious, okay, but you run a

0:30:01.240 --> 0:30:04.600
<v Speaker 1>publicly held company. How curious, kid? We can be very curious.

0:30:04.600 --> 0:30:07.040
<v Speaker 1>And we have a whole team and all they're doing.

0:30:07.480 --> 0:30:11.880
<v Speaker 1>I participated in a in an innovation in house innovation.

0:30:11.960 --> 0:30:16.520
<v Speaker 1>We had eight entries from across the company around applications

0:30:16.560 --> 0:30:18.560
<v Speaker 1>for the metaverse, and we're going to take some of

0:30:18.600 --> 0:30:21.120
<v Speaker 1>those forward. All right. I cannot believe that we've run

0:30:21.160 --> 0:30:23.120
<v Speaker 1>through our time. I'm like blown away. We've got thirty

0:30:23.160 --> 0:30:24.520
<v Speaker 1>seconds left here. I'm going to yell that if I

0:30:24.520 --> 0:30:26.040
<v Speaker 1>don't ask you this question. And I know you were

0:30:26.040 --> 0:30:29.880
<v Speaker 1>with our editorial board team and talking about things Apolloglobal

0:30:30.560 --> 0:30:33.320
<v Speaker 1>third three offers, you guys said, turn and turn them down?

0:30:33.840 --> 0:30:35.680
<v Speaker 1>Are you going to stay independent? What are you gonna do?

0:30:35.760 --> 0:30:38.320
<v Speaker 1>Real quickly, very quickly? I mean, yes, we did. It

0:30:38.360 --> 0:30:41.280
<v Speaker 1>was all very public. They offered eight pound seventy. I

0:30:41.280 --> 0:30:43.720
<v Speaker 1>think our stock is trading at around eight pound seventy

0:30:43.760 --> 0:30:46.200
<v Speaker 1>if you look in pounds sterling, given everything else that's

0:30:46.240 --> 0:30:49.520
<v Speaker 1>going on, and I think, if anything, you know, their

0:30:49.520 --> 0:30:53.640
<v Speaker 1>approach validated our strategy and validated the great prospects that

0:30:53.720 --> 0:30:57.600
<v Speaker 1>this company has. But the right right, maybe I'm very

0:30:57.600 --> 0:31:00.480
<v Speaker 1>happy doing what we're doing. I focus on delivering results.

0:31:00.480 --> 0:31:04.640
<v Speaker 1>The next seating Expectations. That was Pierson's CEO, Andy birrd Well.

0:31:04.640 --> 0:31:06.440
<v Speaker 1>That wraps up the first hour of the weekend edition

0:31:06.440 --> 0:31:09.200
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Business Week from Bloomberg Radio. I'm Carol Masser

0:31:09.280 --> 0:31:11.640
<v Speaker 1>and I'm Tim Stanovic. Ahead in our next hour, how

0:31:11.680 --> 0:31:14.200
<v Speaker 1>the success of the world's most visible drug maker has

0:31:14.280 --> 0:31:18.600
<v Speaker 1>left investors impatient for an encore. This is really more

0:31:18.640 --> 0:31:23.000
<v Speaker 1>than blockbuster status. This is literally half their business this

0:31:23.200 --> 0:31:26.280
<v Speaker 1>given year, and it's a major success. But the question

0:31:26.360 --> 0:31:29.320
<v Speaker 1>is are they a victim of their own success? And

0:31:29.640 --> 0:31:32.600
<v Speaker 1>what happens after you ride the roller coaster all the

0:31:32.640 --> 0:31:35.480
<v Speaker 1>way up? Plus former pro poker player and author Anie

0:31:35.520 --> 0:31:37.920
<v Speaker 1>Duke a knowing when to quit, not just in poker

0:31:38.200 --> 0:31:40.239
<v Speaker 1>but in life. The thing is obviously that the more

0:31:40.280 --> 0:31:42.680
<v Speaker 1>uncertainty there is, the harder it is to figure out

0:31:42.720 --> 0:31:45.200
<v Speaker 1>that you're supposed to quit, and more importantly, the easier

0:31:45.200 --> 0:31:48.120
<v Speaker 1>it is to rationalize that you should keep going. So

0:31:48.240 --> 0:31:50.720
<v Speaker 1>when there's lots of uncertainty, like you know in the

0:31:50.760 --> 0:31:54.040
<v Speaker 1>startup world, it's easy to say it's just around the corner,

0:31:54.160 --> 0:31:56.880
<v Speaker 1>like next quarters when I'm going to start acquiring customers,

0:31:57.040 --> 0:31:59.280
<v Speaker 1>I'm going to start accruing net new a r R

0:31:59.360 --> 0:32:01.880
<v Speaker 1>that's going to show me that I'm successful. You've got

0:32:01.880 --> 0:32:04.040
<v Speaker 1>to get people to help you with the decision. That's

0:32:04.040 --> 0:32:16.720
<v Speaker 1>all coming up. This is Bloomberg. This is Bloomberg Business

0:32:16.800 --> 0:32:20.000
<v Speaker 1>Week inside from the reporters and editors who bring you

0:32:20.040 --> 0:32:24.400
<v Speaker 1>America's most trusted business magazine plus global business, finance and

0:32:24.480 --> 0:32:28.200
<v Speaker 1>tech news. As it happened. Bloomberg Business Week with Carol

0:32:28.240 --> 0:32:32.480
<v Speaker 1>Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovic on Bloomberg Radio.

0:32:32.920 --> 0:32:34.800
<v Speaker 1>Plenty ahead in our second hour of the weekend edition

0:32:34.800 --> 0:32:38.840
<v Speaker 1>of Bloomberg Business Week, including something Old, Something New, Something Poker,

0:32:38.960 --> 0:32:42.080
<v Speaker 1>and something huge in the Nevada Desert that's later in

0:32:42.120 --> 0:32:45.280
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Pursuits. As for the Something Old, Fiser, the more

0:32:45.280 --> 0:32:48.480
<v Speaker 1>than fifty year old company it provided a lifeline and

0:32:48.560 --> 0:32:51.480
<v Speaker 1>make some big profits thanks to its COVID vaccines. As

0:32:51.560 --> 0:32:54.320
<v Speaker 1>for something new, we're going to talk cryptocurrencies and the

0:32:54.360 --> 0:32:56.560
<v Speaker 1>millions that got away under the glare of those in

0:32:56.640 --> 0:32:59.200
<v Speaker 1>law enforcement. Well, speaking of Glaire, we'll paint the picture

0:32:59.240 --> 0:33:01.400
<v Speaker 1>of the massive, nu mental and epic artwork in the

0:33:01.440 --> 0:33:04.360
<v Speaker 1>middle of the harsh Nevada desert. That's are something huge.

0:33:04.400 --> 0:33:06.520
<v Speaker 1>Didn't you like what I did? I did something? Yeah?

0:33:07.080 --> 0:33:11.080
<v Speaker 1>Is that like something you know, Anniversary's wedding things? Yes,

0:33:11.120 --> 0:33:13.760
<v Speaker 1>it is. Well. First up this hour, though, we have

0:33:13.800 --> 0:33:16.080
<v Speaker 1>to talk about Fiser. It's the lead story in the

0:33:16.120 --> 0:33:18.600
<v Speaker 1>business section of the magazine. It was also Bloomberg Big

0:33:18.600 --> 0:33:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Take this past week. It's about the next chapter for

0:33:21.160 --> 0:33:24.440
<v Speaker 1>the pharmaceutical giant after the success of its COVID vaccine

0:33:24.480 --> 0:33:27.640
<v Speaker 1>has left investors wanting more. Back with us as the

0:33:27.760 --> 0:33:30.320
<v Speaker 1>editor of Bloomberg Business Week, Joel Weber, along with the

0:33:30.360 --> 0:33:33.880
<v Speaker 1>reporter on the story, Bloomberg News US Healthcare reporter Riley Griffin.

0:33:34.040 --> 0:33:36.680
<v Speaker 1>This is poised to be the best year on record

0:33:36.800 --> 0:33:40.720
<v Speaker 1>for Fiser. It's expecting over a hundred billion in revenue,

0:33:41.000 --> 0:33:43.520
<v Speaker 1>and more than half of that is coming from the

0:33:43.520 --> 0:33:47.400
<v Speaker 1>COVID nineteen vaccine and its pill. So this is really

0:33:47.920 --> 0:33:52.320
<v Speaker 1>more than blockbuster status. This is literally half their business

0:33:52.400 --> 0:33:55.360
<v Speaker 1>this given year, and it's a major success. But the

0:33:55.480 --> 0:33:58.720
<v Speaker 1>question is are they a victim of their own success?

0:33:58.800 --> 0:34:02.080
<v Speaker 1>And what happens after you ride the roller coaster all

0:34:02.080 --> 0:34:07.360
<v Speaker 1>the way up? So, Riley, if you've got this blockbuster success, um,

0:34:07.640 --> 0:34:09.759
<v Speaker 1>it starts to actually sound like Hollywood a little bit.

0:34:09.760 --> 0:34:12.879
<v Speaker 1>You know, you just become a blockbuster factory, but you've

0:34:12.880 --> 0:34:14.680
<v Speaker 1>got to be kind of like seen around the corner,

0:34:14.840 --> 0:34:17.160
<v Speaker 1>like what kind of what kind of bets don't we

0:34:17.160 --> 0:34:19.919
<v Speaker 1>know about yet? Yeah, Fiser is hoping that they can

0:34:20.040 --> 0:34:24.560
<v Speaker 1>take the messenger RNA technology behind its COVID nineteen vaccine

0:34:24.800 --> 0:34:28.320
<v Speaker 1>and apply that to other disease areas to um continue

0:34:28.360 --> 0:34:31.239
<v Speaker 1>to turn out blockbusters. Next year, we should expect to

0:34:31.320 --> 0:34:35.000
<v Speaker 1>see data from its m r and A flu vaccine,

0:34:35.440 --> 0:34:37.840
<v Speaker 1>and after that they're working on shingles. They're trying to

0:34:37.880 --> 0:34:40.960
<v Speaker 1>tackle cancer and rare diseases through messenger are and A.

0:34:41.520 --> 0:34:43.040
<v Speaker 1>But there are a lot of questions as to whether

0:34:43.160 --> 0:34:45.319
<v Speaker 1>or not any of those products can reap the same

0:34:45.440 --> 0:34:48.000
<v Speaker 1>kind of success we've seen from the COVID nineteen vaccine

0:34:48.040 --> 0:34:52.040
<v Speaker 1>and couple that with some major generic competition that Fiser

0:34:52.200 --> 0:34:55.920
<v Speaker 1>is facing before the end of the decade, they've got

0:34:55.960 --> 0:34:58.040
<v Speaker 1>a lot of questions to answer to Wall Street. You know,

0:34:58.080 --> 0:34:59.920
<v Speaker 1>we spent the last two years talking about m RNA,

0:35:00.400 --> 0:35:02.880
<v Speaker 1>But what does an m r and a flu shot

0:35:02.960 --> 0:35:06.160
<v Speaker 1>do that's better than a traditional flu shot, which, by

0:35:06.160 --> 0:35:08.719
<v Speaker 1>the way, it's flu shot season everyone, It is flu

0:35:08.800 --> 0:35:12.280
<v Speaker 1>shot season. So the hope that Fiser and its competitor

0:35:12.360 --> 0:35:15.440
<v Speaker 1>Maderna have here is that they can really compress the

0:35:15.520 --> 0:35:18.759
<v Speaker 1>production timeline for a shot. Part of the issue that

0:35:18.840 --> 0:35:21.200
<v Speaker 1>flu shots aren't as good as we'd really like them

0:35:21.200 --> 0:35:24.920
<v Speaker 1>to be is that ultimately scientists around the world they

0:35:24.920 --> 0:35:27.120
<v Speaker 1>can bene twice a year, once for the northern hemisphere,

0:35:27.200 --> 0:35:29.920
<v Speaker 1>once for the southern hemisphere, they have to give quite

0:35:29.960 --> 0:35:32.160
<v Speaker 1>a bit of lead time to be able to produce

0:35:32.239 --> 0:35:35.600
<v Speaker 1>those products, and as we now know with covid, virus

0:35:35.680 --> 0:35:38.919
<v Speaker 1>is mutate to survive. Influenza is pretty good at doing

0:35:38.960 --> 0:35:43.000
<v Speaker 1>that too, and so ultimately, over that long period, the

0:35:43.120 --> 0:35:46.359
<v Speaker 1>virus tends to change and the vaccine is often less

0:35:46.360 --> 0:35:48.640
<v Speaker 1>effective than we would hope. So Fiser is hoping it

0:35:48.640 --> 0:35:50.640
<v Speaker 1>can take that same model that we saw with covid

0:35:51.040 --> 0:35:53.200
<v Speaker 1>and apply that to flu and ultimately get a more

0:35:53.239 --> 0:35:56.240
<v Speaker 1>effective flu shot. Okay, so even if they do that, though,

0:35:56.680 --> 0:36:00.640
<v Speaker 1>I mean COVID, these numbers were insane, Like what, there's

0:36:00.640 --> 0:36:04.600
<v Speaker 1>a reality here, you know, maybe a bullish projection and

0:36:04.640 --> 0:36:08.759
<v Speaker 1>then something something a little smaller than that, Like what

0:36:08.880 --> 0:36:11.200
<v Speaker 1>do the what do analysts have to say about what

0:36:11.200 --> 0:36:13.239
<v Speaker 1>what the bottom line will look like at fights are

0:36:13.280 --> 0:36:16.920
<v Speaker 1>going forward? Wall Street doesn't feel too bullish about Fighter

0:36:17.040 --> 0:36:20.960
<v Speaker 1>right now. The stock is down to date this year,

0:36:21.440 --> 0:36:23.759
<v Speaker 1>and I think that you know, if you follow the

0:36:23.800 --> 0:36:27.960
<v Speaker 1>projections for the COVID vaccine next year and through, it

0:36:27.960 --> 0:36:31.120
<v Speaker 1>goes from you know, about thirty seven billion last year

0:36:31.200 --> 0:36:34.600
<v Speaker 1>to what analysts think is about ten billion in So

0:36:34.680 --> 0:36:37.560
<v Speaker 1>this is a big question. They're gonna have to fill

0:36:37.640 --> 0:36:41.920
<v Speaker 1>that gap, and their internal Messenger RNA pipeline is simply

0:36:41.920 --> 0:36:43.759
<v Speaker 1>not going to be enough. Fiser is saying that they

0:36:43.760 --> 0:36:46.200
<v Speaker 1>actually want to add twenty five billion in revenue just

0:36:46.440 --> 0:36:51.120
<v Speaker 1>via M and A throe. So we should expect a

0:36:51.200 --> 0:36:53.319
<v Speaker 1>great number of deals. And they're not doing this in

0:36:53.320 --> 0:36:56.880
<v Speaker 1>a vacuum. I mean, everybody else has got the you know,

0:36:57.000 --> 0:36:59.799
<v Speaker 1>Messenger rn A memos. At this point, they're all going

0:36:59.840 --> 0:37:02.360
<v Speaker 1>to be competing for top you know, talent, you know,

0:37:02.440 --> 0:37:05.000
<v Speaker 1>for startups that might have something innovative in this space.

0:37:05.040 --> 0:37:07.520
<v Speaker 1>So they've got to do this against this backdrop and

0:37:07.560 --> 0:37:10.280
<v Speaker 1>also against a backdrop of a company that was known

0:37:10.400 --> 0:37:13.480
<v Speaker 1>for like building the top and bottom line by acquisition.

0:37:14.000 --> 0:37:16.759
<v Speaker 1>No doubt, you've got Maderna, You've got bion Tech. It's

0:37:16.880 --> 0:37:19.000
<v Speaker 1>very own partner that is a real expert in this space.

0:37:19.000 --> 0:37:21.880
<v Speaker 1>But you also have other players like Eli Lily right,

0:37:22.400 --> 0:37:25.879
<v Speaker 1>um that just spent seven hundred million dollars to try

0:37:25.880 --> 0:37:30.160
<v Speaker 1>to create a genetic medicines facility in Boston. So even

0:37:30.200 --> 0:37:33.319
<v Speaker 1>if you haven't heard of certain m R and A players, um,

0:37:33.360 --> 0:37:36.319
<v Speaker 1>a lot of these bigger companies, say Fiser isn't the

0:37:36.320 --> 0:37:39.040
<v Speaker 1>only one. I actually spoke with the chief scientific officer

0:37:39.080 --> 0:37:41.640
<v Speaker 1>of Eli Lilly and they said, you know, with something

0:37:41.680 --> 0:37:44.600
<v Speaker 1>like Messenger and A, it's a technology, it's a platform.

0:37:44.640 --> 0:37:48.280
<v Speaker 1>You should expect every pharmaceutical company to use that same

0:37:48.320 --> 0:37:51.680
<v Speaker 1>technology as one of the fundamental pillars of building out

0:37:51.680 --> 0:37:55.200
<v Speaker 1>a drug business moving forward. Okay, so what you know,

0:37:55.520 --> 0:37:58.239
<v Speaker 1>boosters still going to be a part of the business

0:37:58.280 --> 0:38:00.920
<v Speaker 1>going forward. We would think, right, and like, there is

0:38:00.960 --> 0:38:04.360
<v Speaker 1>that version of this where your booster and your flu shot,

0:38:04.480 --> 0:38:07.400
<v Speaker 1>like all magically become one and we use Marne. That

0:38:07.440 --> 0:38:10.680
<v Speaker 1>sounds great, got it, Joe? Yeah, you know, gonna wait,

0:38:10.960 --> 0:38:12.520
<v Speaker 1>won't be happening this year. I have to wait two

0:38:12.560 --> 0:38:14.920
<v Speaker 1>weeks from getting my covid booster to get my flu booster.

0:38:15.200 --> 0:38:19.160
<v Speaker 1>So just arms flendar. But you know, say these things

0:38:19.160 --> 0:38:21.560
<v Speaker 1>stay separate even like what what does that? What does

0:38:21.560 --> 0:38:24.040
<v Speaker 1>that business look like? Are they Is there a conversation

0:38:24.080 --> 0:38:26.640
<v Speaker 1>about keeping these things separate, and maybe that's more lucrative

0:38:26.640 --> 0:38:29.360
<v Speaker 1>than if they're one. So ultimately, Fiser has said that

0:38:29.400 --> 0:38:31.920
<v Speaker 1>it wants to do a flu and covid combo, but

0:38:31.960 --> 0:38:34.279
<v Speaker 1>I think we're still a couple of years away from that.

0:38:34.320 --> 0:38:36.759
<v Speaker 1>We need that that flu shot, that messenger on a

0:38:36.800 --> 0:38:38.840
<v Speaker 1>flu shot to come to market first, and and the

0:38:38.920 --> 0:38:42.239
<v Speaker 1>earliest state is next or earliest timeframe is next year

0:38:42.280 --> 0:38:44.800
<v Speaker 1>for them to be able to do that. But look

0:38:44.800 --> 0:38:48.960
<v Speaker 1>at uptake of boosters now, I mean, Bloomberg Intelligence put

0:38:49.000 --> 0:38:52.000
<v Speaker 1>out a memo today um showing that only two point

0:38:52.040 --> 0:38:54.640
<v Speaker 1>seven percent of the US population has gotten a visor

0:38:54.800 --> 0:39:00.760
<v Speaker 1>or maderna by valent COVID booster, So uptake is increasingly waning.

0:39:00.880 --> 0:39:03.279
<v Speaker 1>Thanks to Bloomberg Business Week editor Joel Webber in US

0:39:03.320 --> 0:39:06.439
<v Speaker 1>healthcare reporter Riley Griffin. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week.

0:39:06.560 --> 0:39:08.960
<v Speaker 1>Coming up, the FED locked up a storage device full

0:39:09.080 --> 0:39:14.200
<v Speaker 1>of illegitimate crypto tokens, and then someone actually stole the loot.

0:39:14.440 --> 0:39:17.560
<v Speaker 1>We'll get more on that right after this. This is Bloomberg.

0:39:23.000 --> 0:39:26.360
<v Speaker 1>This is Bloomberg Business This Week with Carol Messer and

0:39:26.440 --> 0:39:31.839
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stenovik from Bloomberg Radio. A really

0:39:31.840 --> 0:39:34.400
<v Speaker 1>good read in the finance section of the magazine this

0:39:34.440 --> 0:39:37.840
<v Speaker 1>week details how millions of dollars worth of cryptocurrency just

0:39:38.040 --> 0:39:41.560
<v Speaker 1>vanished as federal agents watched helplessly. The story was written

0:39:41.600 --> 0:39:45.480
<v Speaker 1>by David Vorriakos of Bloomberg News and edited by Pat mcneer. Pats,

0:39:45.560 --> 0:39:48.440
<v Speaker 1>the markets and finance editor for the magazine, Patten Business.

0:39:48.440 --> 0:39:50.399
<v Speaker 1>We get her, Joel Webber. They are here to help

0:39:50.400 --> 0:39:52.640
<v Speaker 1>break down the scheme and talk a little bit about

0:39:52.719 --> 0:39:56.680
<v Speaker 1>it's blowback. Remotely swiping bitcoin that's been seized by the

0:39:56.719 --> 0:39:59.560
<v Speaker 1>government that doesn't like totally make sense. You would think

0:39:59.600 --> 0:40:02.319
<v Speaker 1>that couldn't do such a thing, but it turns out

0:40:02.360 --> 0:40:05.600
<v Speaker 1>maybe you could. Pat, So what happened? Yeah, So the

0:40:05.640 --> 0:40:08.040
<v Speaker 1>first thing I asked David when I read an early

0:40:08.120 --> 0:40:11.160
<v Speaker 1>draft of the story, was so the FEDS had basically

0:40:11.160 --> 0:40:12.919
<v Speaker 1>sees these things that kind of look like a small

0:40:12.960 --> 0:40:14.560
<v Speaker 1>hard driver, actually they kind of look like an MP

0:40:14.640 --> 0:40:16.359
<v Speaker 1>three player and put it in a storage locker. And

0:40:16.480 --> 0:40:19.400
<v Speaker 1>I asked the dumb questions, So why didn't they just

0:40:19.560 --> 0:40:25.200
<v Speaker 1>unplug it? Um? Uh, it's not that simple, and the

0:40:25.239 --> 0:40:28.120
<v Speaker 1>FEDS knew it isn't that simple. Uh, you know what's

0:40:28.200 --> 0:40:31.239
<v Speaker 1>actually on one of these storage devices is really just

0:40:31.600 --> 0:40:36.440
<v Speaker 1>uh series of cryptographic private keys Bitcoin of course crypto

0:40:36.560 --> 0:40:40.960
<v Speaker 1>with on the blockchain, and um, if you have the

0:40:41.120 --> 0:40:44.920
<v Speaker 1>right set of passwords, you can reconstruct all those keys

0:40:45.000 --> 0:40:50.839
<v Speaker 1>somewhere else. So when the FEDS basically seized this cash

0:40:50.960 --> 0:40:54.480
<v Speaker 1>of bitcoin as evidence in a money laundering case, um,

0:40:54.520 --> 0:40:56.640
<v Speaker 1>they knew from the get go that, uh, this money

0:40:56.719 --> 0:40:59.600
<v Speaker 1>was very vulnerable to being taken. So they were kind

0:40:59.640 --> 0:41:01.920
<v Speaker 1>of like watching on the blockchain what was happening with

0:41:01.960 --> 0:41:06.040
<v Speaker 1>these wallets, and um they very quickly uh saw those

0:41:06.120 --> 0:41:10.319
<v Speaker 1>coins going away. So what what's what's also interesting here?

0:41:10.400 --> 0:41:15.080
<v Speaker 1>So this arrest, Let's talk about Larry because there are uh,

0:41:15.120 --> 0:41:18.200
<v Speaker 1>there are people uh in the story and in crypto

0:41:18.400 --> 0:41:21.200
<v Speaker 1>or memorable Larry might be one of them. Um uh,

0:41:21.440 --> 0:41:28.239
<v Speaker 1>something of a milestone, just kidding, except for your dad,

0:41:29.000 --> 0:41:33.279
<v Speaker 1>but you've referred to it. But in David's where there's

0:41:33.280 --> 0:41:36.799
<v Speaker 1>something of a milestone in crypto enforcement. What the first

0:41:36.880 --> 0:41:40.040
<v Speaker 1>character in the story, Warry ran what's called a tumbler

0:41:40.200 --> 0:41:43.000
<v Speaker 1>or a mixer. So basically, this is a thing that

0:41:43.040 --> 0:41:45.920
<v Speaker 1>you can use to if you want to sort of

0:41:46.120 --> 0:41:49.600
<v Speaker 1>make your cryptocurrency transaction truly private, right, because you can

0:41:49.600 --> 0:41:53.400
<v Speaker 1>always see addresses on the blockchain, and if you can

0:41:53.440 --> 0:41:55.160
<v Speaker 1>kind of stitch together and that information, you can kind

0:41:55.160 --> 0:41:57.960
<v Speaker 1>of figure out where a bit of bitcoin came from.

0:41:58.000 --> 0:42:00.320
<v Speaker 1>There are these services called mixers and tone where is

0:42:00.320 --> 0:42:02.799
<v Speaker 1>where you sort of like it's what it sounds like, right,

0:42:02.840 --> 0:42:05.600
<v Speaker 1>you just would have mixed together a lot of cryptocurrency

0:42:05.680 --> 0:42:07.600
<v Speaker 1>and and then spit them out in different ways so

0:42:07.680 --> 0:42:10.040
<v Speaker 1>that you can't find it. I'm visualizing pat like a

0:42:10.120 --> 0:42:11.920
<v Speaker 1>rock tumbler that you had when you're a kid, and

0:42:11.960 --> 0:42:13.960
<v Speaker 1>I think that's I don't know, is perhaps that's where

0:42:13.960 --> 0:42:15.440
<v Speaker 1>the name comes from. Right, You put a bunch of

0:42:15.520 --> 0:42:17.759
<v Speaker 1>rocks in, you let it set for a month, and

0:42:17.960 --> 0:42:20.160
<v Speaker 1>the rocks that come out look completely different. Yeah, yeah,

0:42:20.160 --> 0:42:21.839
<v Speaker 1>I think that I think that's basically right, or you're

0:42:21.840 --> 0:42:23.840
<v Speaker 1>just sort of you're you're stirring everything together so that

0:42:23.880 --> 0:42:27.759
<v Speaker 1>you can't figure out sort of where where they came from.

0:42:27.800 --> 0:42:30.080
<v Speaker 1>And that's not per se illegal, but as with a

0:42:30.080 --> 0:42:32.120
<v Speaker 1>lot of things in money wondering, you know, running a

0:42:32.160 --> 0:42:34.799
<v Speaker 1>secret car watch isn't necessarily illegal either, but if you're

0:42:34.840 --> 0:42:37.560
<v Speaker 1>doing it to hide where the money is coming from,

0:42:37.800 --> 0:42:40.600
<v Speaker 1>then that's what's happening. So the Feds win after our

0:42:40.640 --> 0:42:46.440
<v Speaker 1>first character, Larry, for for basically money wandering, um. And

0:42:46.480 --> 0:42:49.439
<v Speaker 1>then suddenly the money began to disappear, and they started asking, okay,

0:42:49.480 --> 0:42:53.279
<v Speaker 1>so who's actually taking the money out of it? And um.

0:42:53.360 --> 0:42:58.400
<v Speaker 1>Ultimately they decided they've actually accused not Larry but his

0:42:58.440 --> 0:43:01.879
<v Speaker 1>brother Gary of doing that. And so I can't make

0:43:01.920 --> 0:43:05.399
<v Speaker 1>this up, right Hilary and Gary. So Gary is still

0:43:05.400 --> 0:43:07.799
<v Speaker 1>awaiting trial, we should say, so this is not this

0:43:07.840 --> 0:43:11.200
<v Speaker 1>is an allegation, but they're looking at uh sort of

0:43:11.360 --> 0:43:13.960
<v Speaker 1>they've they've been following the money. Well, speaking of following

0:43:13.960 --> 0:43:16.320
<v Speaker 1>the money, I cannot do an interview with you, Pat

0:43:16.360 --> 0:43:19.440
<v Speaker 1>without talking about this picture of Gary Harmon that's featured

0:43:19.560 --> 0:43:22.239
<v Speaker 1>in a tub full of money. Uh. This is a

0:43:22.280 --> 0:43:24.520
<v Speaker 1>picture that the U. S. District Court for the District

0:43:24.520 --> 0:43:27.319
<v Speaker 1>of Columbia has. What's going on here? Well, so that's

0:43:27.320 --> 0:43:32.720
<v Speaker 1>a picture that prosecutors found on his phone, um, And

0:43:33.200 --> 0:43:37.280
<v Speaker 1>basically they were collecting evidence that he had come into money.

0:43:37.360 --> 0:43:39.200
<v Speaker 1>So they're sort of looking at that and saying, it's like,

0:43:39.239 --> 0:43:42.239
<v Speaker 1>it looks like this guy, Um, suddenly, you know, had

0:43:42.320 --> 0:43:43.840
<v Speaker 1>had a fair had a fair amount of money. So

0:43:43.920 --> 0:43:47.399
<v Speaker 1>that's nothing only he's bathing in cash. To be fair,

0:43:47.680 --> 0:43:51.920
<v Speaker 1>it does look if you look closely, mostly one dollar bills,

0:43:52.280 --> 0:43:54.560
<v Speaker 1>maybe a couple of two dollar bills in there, Like Grandma,

0:43:54.880 --> 0:43:56.640
<v Speaker 1>you're saying, like like six hundred bucks at the most.

0:43:56.719 --> 0:43:59.239
<v Speaker 1>Here Joel, it looks a little bit less than that.

0:43:59.239 --> 0:44:00.880
<v Speaker 1>But is this what you to do for your birthday?

0:44:00.960 --> 0:44:05.560
<v Speaker 1>I mean, it certainly seems like a good idea. Don't

0:44:05.600 --> 0:44:07.520
<v Speaker 1>take a photo of it? Right, So how do this

0:44:07.600 --> 0:44:09.600
<v Speaker 1>all kind of unfold? I mean? And how it all

0:44:09.640 --> 0:44:13.040
<v Speaker 1>came to be? So, you know, our reporter David vyakas mean,

0:44:13.040 --> 0:44:15.040
<v Speaker 1>he's always sort of like watching court cases, and so

0:44:15.160 --> 0:44:17.160
<v Speaker 1>he's been, you know, sort of looking at how these

0:44:17.200 --> 0:44:19.560
<v Speaker 1>cases have been moving through court. But what this is,

0:44:19.640 --> 0:44:22.080
<v Speaker 1>this is really a case of like in the early.

0:44:22.719 --> 0:44:25.040
<v Speaker 1>You know, there are people who want to use bitcoin

0:44:25.160 --> 0:44:30.440
<v Speaker 1>to make transactions that maybe you shouldn't be making. UM

0:44:30.719 --> 0:44:33.800
<v Speaker 1>and uh, there's a place called the darknet where people

0:44:33.840 --> 0:44:35.560
<v Speaker 1>do that, sort of a part of the Internet that's

0:44:35.560 --> 0:44:38.319
<v Speaker 1>not easily accessible on Google. And so first of all,

0:44:38.360 --> 0:44:40.400
<v Speaker 1>you're connecting in buyers and sellers. But then the question is,

0:44:40.440 --> 0:44:41.880
<v Speaker 1>so how do the buyers since sellers pay for the

0:44:41.920 --> 0:44:44.120
<v Speaker 1>things that you're not supposed to be paying for. Bitcoin

0:44:44.200 --> 0:44:46.399
<v Speaker 1>is one way, but as we've just discussed, it's not

0:44:47.320 --> 0:44:52.040
<v Speaker 1>perfectly anonymous. There are services that are actually very good

0:44:52.200 --> 0:44:57.080
<v Speaker 1>at following the bread crumbs. So, uh, Larry Herman's innovation

0:44:57.640 --> 0:45:02.400
<v Speaker 1>was finding a way to obscure those transactions, and it

0:45:02.520 --> 0:45:04.719
<v Speaker 1>was very successful and it got the government's attention. And

0:45:04.800 --> 0:45:06.960
<v Speaker 1>as as you know, it's not this is not the

0:45:06.960 --> 0:45:09.279
<v Speaker 1>only service that's gotten the government's attention since then, right,

0:45:09.680 --> 0:45:11.919
<v Speaker 1>you know, there's a there's another one called Tornado Cash,

0:45:11.920 --> 0:45:13.239
<v Speaker 1>and I think a lot of people who are in

0:45:13.239 --> 0:45:16.319
<v Speaker 1>this um are asking like, how how long will these

0:45:16.360 --> 0:45:19.920
<v Speaker 1>mixers be around? So we've got some interesting people and

0:45:20.320 --> 0:45:24.359
<v Speaker 1>there's a hard drive full of bitcoin, Bitcoin now worse

0:45:24.440 --> 0:45:27.320
<v Speaker 1>more than it was. Then, What what did law enforcement observe.

0:45:27.480 --> 0:45:30.400
<v Speaker 1>They've got the devices in a locker, but what they

0:45:30.440 --> 0:45:32.960
<v Speaker 1>what you really want to watch where the action is

0:45:33.239 --> 0:45:35.360
<v Speaker 1>on the blockchain, and so you're looking at wallets. So

0:45:35.400 --> 0:45:38.160
<v Speaker 1>they had a list of like sixteen wallets. What does

0:45:38.160 --> 0:45:39.640
<v Speaker 1>the wallet look like? I mean, you're just looking at

0:45:39.640 --> 0:45:42.240
<v Speaker 1>an address for a bunch of numbers and then there's

0:45:42.280 --> 0:45:44.600
<v Speaker 1>just a certain number of bitcoin assigned to it, and

0:45:44.600 --> 0:45:46.480
<v Speaker 1>then they could begin to see like those bitcoin, we're

0:45:46.520 --> 0:45:49.040
<v Speaker 1>just going away or they were getting transactual way and

0:45:49.320 --> 0:45:52.240
<v Speaker 1>like you know, and um, so you should have unplugged

0:45:52.239 --> 0:45:54.239
<v Speaker 1>the hard drive. You should have unplugged hard drive. As

0:45:54.239 --> 0:45:56.720
<v Speaker 1>we said, it doesn't really matter whether you un wondering

0:45:57.160 --> 0:45:59.560
<v Speaker 1>that's what I was wondering. If if if you if

0:45:59.560 --> 0:46:01.600
<v Speaker 1>you do have one of these USB like our old

0:46:01.600 --> 0:46:04.879
<v Speaker 1>school you know, MP three player type things, and that's

0:46:04.920 --> 0:46:07.520
<v Speaker 1>what you store your bitcoin on, does that mean it's

0:46:07.520 --> 0:46:10.560
<v Speaker 1>not safe? Like it can still be accessed because it's well,

0:46:10.600 --> 0:46:12.880
<v Speaker 1>what everyone in crypto will tell you the most important

0:46:12.920 --> 0:46:15.279
<v Speaker 1>thing is to never give away your seed phrase. So

0:46:15.800 --> 0:46:17.880
<v Speaker 1>seed phrase is a thing that can be used to

0:46:18.480 --> 0:46:22.760
<v Speaker 1>basically reconstruct raven lands at midnight. So that's not mine.

0:46:24.280 --> 0:46:26.879
<v Speaker 1>So is that what you mean, do you it's it's

0:46:26.960 --> 0:46:30.760
<v Speaker 1>it's something literally like, um, a bunch of random numbers,

0:46:30.840 --> 0:46:32.879
<v Speaker 1>you know, or I'm sorry, not a bunch of randrooms.

0:46:32.640 --> 0:46:36.480
<v Speaker 1>A string of random words. There's usually twelve, sometimes twenty four.

0:46:36.960 --> 0:46:39.120
<v Speaker 1>And um, I am not an expert on how the

0:46:39.160 --> 0:46:42.920
<v Speaker 1>cryptography works, but it's cryptographically related to I believe the

0:46:42.920 --> 0:46:45.480
<v Speaker 1>private keys that you're using. And so if you enter

0:46:45.520 --> 0:46:47.440
<v Speaker 1>that seed phrase and this this, this is not just

0:46:47.480 --> 0:46:49.520
<v Speaker 1>with the hardware, while this is with a software whallet,

0:46:49.760 --> 0:46:54.400
<v Speaker 1>that seed phrase is the thing that's it's it's the

0:46:54.440 --> 0:46:56.800
<v Speaker 1>key to everything. That was Bloomberg business Week Markets and

0:46:56.840 --> 0:47:00.680
<v Speaker 1>Finance editor Pat Regnier alongside Bloomberg business Week editor Joel Webber.

0:47:00.719 --> 0:47:02.640
<v Speaker 1>All right, still to come on Bloomberg business Week. We

0:47:02.719 --> 0:47:06.120
<v Speaker 1>might think that quitters never win and winners never quit,

0:47:06.200 --> 0:47:09.400
<v Speaker 1>but the truth is winners quit a lot. Carol You

0:47:09.440 --> 0:47:11.880
<v Speaker 1>and Ed Ludlow spoke with former pro poker player and

0:47:11.960 --> 0:47:14.640
<v Speaker 1>author Any Duke and how the art of quitting is

0:47:14.960 --> 0:47:18.120
<v Speaker 1>something that extends far beyond the poker table. That's coming

0:47:18.200 --> 0:47:25.880
<v Speaker 1>up next. This is Bloomberg Broadcasting from the financial capital

0:47:25.920 --> 0:47:29.719
<v Speaker 1>of the world, Bloomberg eleven Frio in New York to Washington,

0:47:29.800 --> 0:47:33.919
<v Speaker 1>d C. Bloomberg to Boston, Bloomberg one, O six one

0:47:34.000 --> 0:47:37.440
<v Speaker 1>to San Francisco, Bloomberg nine sixty to the country, Sirius

0:47:37.640 --> 0:47:40.799
<v Speaker 1>XM General one nine and around the globe, the Bloomberg

0:47:40.800 --> 0:47:45.440
<v Speaker 1>Business and Bloomberg Radio dot Com. This is Bloomberg Business

0:47:45.440 --> 0:47:49.239
<v Speaker 1>Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes. Tim Stenovan

0:47:49.600 --> 0:47:53.160
<v Speaker 1>on Bloomberg Radio. I'm not sure about you, but I

0:47:53.200 --> 0:47:55.640
<v Speaker 1>grew up with parents that stress. Not giving up easily

0:47:55.719 --> 0:47:57.839
<v Speaker 1>or at all, to be quite honest, not walking away

0:47:57.880 --> 0:48:00.480
<v Speaker 1>from things and yet learning to do just that may

0:48:00.520 --> 0:48:03.560
<v Speaker 1>be a very very important life lesson. And our next

0:48:03.560 --> 0:48:05.640
<v Speaker 1>guest writes about that. Yeah, we're talking about the former

0:48:05.680 --> 0:48:08.640
<v Speaker 1>professional poker player Annie Duke. She's also the best selling

0:48:08.680 --> 0:48:11.040
<v Speaker 1>author of Thinking in Bets and the co founder of

0:48:11.080 --> 0:48:14.239
<v Speaker 1>the Alliance for Decision Education. It's a nonprofit that has

0:48:14.280 --> 0:48:17.839
<v Speaker 1>the mission of empowering students through decision skills. The latest book, Quit,

0:48:17.880 --> 0:48:19.680
<v Speaker 1>The Power of Knowing When to Walk Away, has a

0:48:19.719 --> 0:48:21.960
<v Speaker 1>lot of advice when it comes to making tough choices,

0:48:22.320 --> 0:48:24.960
<v Speaker 1>and not just at the poker table. She spoke with

0:48:24.960 --> 0:48:28.440
<v Speaker 1>Blueberg News West Coast correspondent Ed Ludlow and myself. I

0:48:28.440 --> 0:48:31.160
<v Speaker 1>think there's just a really interesting conversation to be had

0:48:31.239 --> 0:48:34.719
<v Speaker 1>between poker, which is this very high stakes decision making

0:48:34.800 --> 0:48:39.480
<v Speaker 1>under uncertainty exercise, and cognitive science, which is thinking about,

0:48:39.680 --> 0:48:42.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, how do we make decisions? And I think

0:48:42.080 --> 0:48:44.640
<v Speaker 1>that the two disciplines can really inform each other. So,

0:48:45.120 --> 0:48:47.000
<v Speaker 1>you know, the way I started thinking about quitting was

0:48:47.040 --> 0:48:50.120
<v Speaker 1>that realizing that the option to quit, that option is

0:48:50.120 --> 0:48:54.320
<v Speaker 1>so incredibly valuable in poker, because if you couldn't fold

0:48:54.360 --> 0:48:57.359
<v Speaker 1>your hand, it wouldn't really be that skillful game, right,

0:48:57.400 --> 0:48:59.279
<v Speaker 1>and poker players have to really think about how to

0:48:59.320 --> 0:49:01.640
<v Speaker 1>get good at cut and their losses. And actually, when

0:49:01.640 --> 0:49:05.160
<v Speaker 1>you look at the difference between elite players and merely okay,

0:49:05.160 --> 0:49:09.000
<v Speaker 1>one one of the biggest differences between amateurs and experts

0:49:09.000 --> 0:49:11.520
<v Speaker 1>and poker is how often they fold. When you just

0:49:11.640 --> 0:49:14.000
<v Speaker 1>look at they get their first two card combination in

0:49:14.040 --> 0:49:17.000
<v Speaker 1>a game of Texas hold them, amateurs will play over

0:49:17.000 --> 0:49:19.759
<v Speaker 1>fifty of their hands, so they're folding less than half

0:49:19.800 --> 0:49:26.719
<v Speaker 1>the time, whereas experts are playing about fifteen. You were

0:49:26.719 --> 0:49:29.479
<v Speaker 1>one of the top poker players for twenty years, right,

0:49:29.960 --> 0:49:32.319
<v Speaker 1>and you've written this book, and it's hard to get

0:49:32.360 --> 0:49:36.400
<v Speaker 1>one's head around the strength of being able to walk away.

0:49:36.600 --> 0:49:40.040
<v Speaker 1>Talk me through the psychology of that. So here's the thing.

0:49:40.080 --> 0:49:43.120
<v Speaker 1>Whenever we make a decision, we don't have all the facts,

0:49:43.200 --> 0:49:45.480
<v Speaker 1>and luck is going to influence the outcome. So I'm

0:49:45.480 --> 0:49:47.719
<v Speaker 1>sure you've had that feeling d of Oh, I wish

0:49:47.719 --> 0:49:49.440
<v Speaker 1>I knew then what I know now. I might have

0:49:49.480 --> 0:49:52.239
<v Speaker 1>made a daily basis of course, right. I mean, look

0:49:52.239 --> 0:49:54.040
<v Speaker 1>at what's happening with the market right like you're You're

0:49:54.040 --> 0:49:57.160
<v Speaker 1>finding out information very rapidly every single day. So this

0:49:57.200 --> 0:49:59.680
<v Speaker 1>is where the option to equip become so valuable because

0:49:59.719 --> 0:50:02.640
<v Speaker 1>it'll allows us to start things even though we don't

0:50:02.719 --> 0:50:04.800
<v Speaker 1>have all the facts. That we know very little, because

0:50:04.840 --> 0:50:08.279
<v Speaker 1>we know theoretically that when we find out new information,

0:50:08.520 --> 0:50:10.760
<v Speaker 1>we can actually change our minds and we can change course.

0:50:11.239 --> 0:50:14.200
<v Speaker 1>The problem for us as decision makers, though, is that

0:50:14.200 --> 0:50:17.080
<v Speaker 1>that decision is itself made under uncertainty. I got to

0:50:17.120 --> 0:50:19.120
<v Speaker 1>cool you out on that though, because you are also

0:50:19.160 --> 0:50:21.560
<v Speaker 1>a venture capitalists, and this is what fascinates me. You're

0:50:21.600 --> 0:50:25.279
<v Speaker 1>a seed stage venture capitalist, right, you invest in many companies,

0:50:25.600 --> 0:50:28.160
<v Speaker 1>not all of them are going to be successful. How

0:50:28.200 --> 0:50:30.200
<v Speaker 1>do you say, right? I have to say no, I

0:50:30.239 --> 0:50:33.400
<v Speaker 1>have to walk away from this potential opportunity, So you

0:50:33.480 --> 0:50:36.440
<v Speaker 1>have to be thinking in a structured way about the decision.

0:50:36.960 --> 0:50:41.319
<v Speaker 1>So essentially you're taking all of your experience and you

0:50:41.400 --> 0:50:44.640
<v Speaker 1>are thinking about what are the signals that I see

0:50:45.000 --> 0:50:48.759
<v Speaker 1>that tell me that an investment is worthwhile? And then

0:50:48.800 --> 0:50:52.640
<v Speaker 1>you have to systematize that. So, as an example, let's

0:50:52.640 --> 0:50:54.560
<v Speaker 1>say that you know at Seed what you care about.

0:50:54.640 --> 0:50:56.960
<v Speaker 1>What's the quality of the market, what's the quality of

0:50:56.960 --> 0:50:59.440
<v Speaker 1>the product, what's quality of the founder, what's quality of

0:50:59.440 --> 0:51:02.480
<v Speaker 1>the team. You have to be systematic and making very

0:51:02.480 --> 0:51:05.360
<v Speaker 1>clear and precise ratings of those things every time a

0:51:05.400 --> 0:51:07.560
<v Speaker 1>founder comes into pitch, and then you also have to

0:51:07.600 --> 0:51:10.920
<v Speaker 1>be thinking ahead. And by doing that, what it allows

0:51:10.920 --> 0:51:13.719
<v Speaker 1>you to do, first of all, is to overcome some bias,

0:51:13.760 --> 0:51:16.719
<v Speaker 1>and you're creating a record that then allows you, as

0:51:16.760 --> 0:51:19.560
<v Speaker 1>you see how those companies do, to go back and

0:51:19.640 --> 0:51:21.640
<v Speaker 1>check on them and say, what was I thinking at

0:51:21.680 --> 0:51:25.719
<v Speaker 1>the time, and like, how were my forecasts? You know,

0:51:25.760 --> 0:51:28.120
<v Speaker 1>I was looking at your book and you're right, you know.

0:51:28.160 --> 0:51:31.440
<v Speaker 1>We need to redefine what failed and wasted means. You know,

0:51:31.480 --> 0:51:34.560
<v Speaker 1>when we worry so much about quitting, and that quitting

0:51:34.600 --> 0:51:36.879
<v Speaker 1>means that we failed. What exactly are we failing at

0:51:36.920 --> 0:51:39.359
<v Speaker 1>If you quit something that's no longer worth pursuing, that's

0:51:39.400 --> 0:51:42.560
<v Speaker 1>not a failure of that's a success. Talk about Anie

0:51:42.600 --> 0:51:45.759
<v Speaker 1>turning it upside down. So the problem, Carol, is that

0:51:45.800 --> 0:51:49.160
<v Speaker 1>we tend to think about waste as a backward looking problem. Right,

0:51:49.200 --> 0:51:51.480
<v Speaker 1>So we're worried if we are in a job and

0:51:51.560 --> 0:51:52.880
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't work out and we have to quit and

0:51:52.880 --> 0:51:55.040
<v Speaker 1>walk away, that we'll have wasted our time in it.

0:51:55.760 --> 0:51:58.279
<v Speaker 1>So these have to do with like resources that we've

0:51:58.280 --> 0:52:00.400
<v Speaker 1>already sunk into this, And this is part of the

0:52:00.440 --> 0:52:04.359
<v Speaker 1>sunk cost fallacy prevents us from walking away because that's

0:52:04.400 --> 0:52:06.720
<v Speaker 1>the moment that you go from failing to having failed.

0:52:07.120 --> 0:52:08.879
<v Speaker 1>That's the moment you go from having a ten dollar

0:52:08.960 --> 0:52:12.439
<v Speaker 1>loss on the books to having a realized ten dollar

0:52:12.520 --> 0:52:14.920
<v Speaker 1>loss or a sure loss of ten dollars. And the

0:52:15.000 --> 0:52:18.600
<v Speaker 1>problem with that backward looking perspective is that it causes

0:52:18.640 --> 0:52:21.160
<v Speaker 1>you to put more time, effort, and money into something

0:52:21.200 --> 0:52:24.719
<v Speaker 1>that isn't worthwhile. Was there a real life lesson that

0:52:24.760 --> 0:52:26.960
<v Speaker 1>you learned where you didn't quit when you should have?

0:52:27.600 --> 0:52:32.400
<v Speaker 1>Oh my gosh, absolutely so. I think I, like most people,

0:52:32.640 --> 0:52:35.719
<v Speaker 1>have stuck to things too long. I should have quit

0:52:35.760 --> 0:52:38.440
<v Speaker 1>poker earlier. I wasn't happy. And the other thing was

0:52:38.520 --> 0:52:40.560
<v Speaker 1>that the game was changing in a way where players

0:52:40.560 --> 0:52:43.759
<v Speaker 1>were getting way better than me, and I, honestly, at

0:52:43.760 --> 0:52:45.520
<v Speaker 1>that point in my career didn't want to put in

0:52:45.560 --> 0:52:48.080
<v Speaker 1>the time to keep up. And so I think I

0:52:48.120 --> 0:52:50.319
<v Speaker 1>took too long to get to that decision. And I

0:52:50.360 --> 0:52:52.040
<v Speaker 1>think part of the reason why, and this is a

0:52:52.200 --> 0:52:54.840
<v Speaker 1>really important lesson, is that when your identity is wrapped

0:52:54.920 --> 0:52:57.160
<v Speaker 1>up in it, but I was a poker player, I

0:52:57.160 --> 0:52:59.440
<v Speaker 1>think it becomes very, very hard to walk away. And

0:52:59.480 --> 0:53:01.520
<v Speaker 1>we need to be thinking about that in these types

0:53:01.560 --> 0:53:04.279
<v Speaker 1>of decisions. Is is it because you know, am I happy?

0:53:04.400 --> 0:53:05.920
<v Speaker 1>Or is it because I feel like it's kind of

0:53:05.920 --> 0:53:08.600
<v Speaker 1>who I am. That's former professional poker player and author

0:53:08.600 --> 0:53:11.120
<v Speaker 1>Annie Duke. Be sure to check out her latest book, Quit,

0:53:11.320 --> 0:53:14.080
<v Speaker 1>The Power of Knowing When to walk Away gets out. Now,

0:53:14.120 --> 0:53:16.399
<v Speaker 1>Do you know when to quit? Don't? It's hard? Yeah,

0:53:16.400 --> 0:53:19.040
<v Speaker 1>it's really hard. All right. You're listening to Bloomberg Business Week.

0:53:19.080 --> 0:53:21.920
<v Speaker 1>Coming up, we talk desert art and New York City

0:53:21.960 --> 0:53:24.120
<v Speaker 1>co ops as we take on the pursuit section of

0:53:24.160 --> 0:53:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the magazine. This is Bloomberg. You're listening to Bloomberg business

0:53:34.920 --> 0:53:38.640
<v Speaker 1>Week with Carol Messer and Bloomberg Quick Takes Tim Stinovich

0:53:38.920 --> 0:53:42.680
<v Speaker 1>from Bloomberg Radio. Every new walk is like a new

0:53:42.719 --> 0:53:44.919
<v Speaker 1>piece of box. It does in different stories to tell

0:53:45.000 --> 0:53:47.680
<v Speaker 1>the time. Wines as a whole really speak to that

0:53:47.760 --> 0:53:51.160
<v Speaker 1>quintessential Need is the most powerful car made in the

0:53:51.239 --> 0:53:54.960
<v Speaker 1>US period. You get the beautiful interior, the iconic design.

0:53:55.000 --> 0:53:57.600
<v Speaker 1>It's very chee and pos even if you be for it.

0:53:57.719 --> 0:54:00.719
<v Speaker 1>It's something that when I can get Tom Neper a

0:54:00.760 --> 0:54:04.040
<v Speaker 1>weekly dive into the Pursuit section of Bloomberg Business Week magazine.

0:54:04.160 --> 0:54:06.439
<v Speaker 1>So happy to have with us Bloomberg Business Week Arts

0:54:06.440 --> 0:54:09.480
<v Speaker 1>columnist James Tarmy. I believe he's arts extraordinary, is it? Yeah?

0:54:09.480 --> 0:54:11.239
<v Speaker 1>He can be whatever he wants. And this is a

0:54:11.239 --> 0:54:13.959
<v Speaker 1>space where we can come up with our own titles.

0:54:13.200 --> 0:54:16.719
<v Speaker 1>So James welcome. You've got the lead story in this

0:54:16.760 --> 0:54:20.040
<v Speaker 1>week's Pursuits section in which you ventured out in the

0:54:20.120 --> 0:54:24.400
<v Speaker 1>vast Nevada desert to explore artists Michael Heiser's two ninety

0:54:24.440 --> 0:54:27.680
<v Speaker 1>nine acre work of art. It's called City. Yes, James

0:54:27.719 --> 0:54:30.200
<v Speaker 1>is here. We also have the editor of the Pursuits

0:54:30.239 --> 0:54:33.720
<v Speaker 1>section World Chris Rouser. He is with us um alright.

0:54:33.760 --> 0:54:35.839
<v Speaker 1>So first of all, all right, who found out about

0:54:35.880 --> 0:54:38.600
<v Speaker 1>this first? So James has been working on this, uh

0:54:38.800 --> 0:54:42.719
<v Speaker 1>for a very long time. The artist Michael Heiser is reclusive.

0:54:42.760 --> 0:54:45.879
<v Speaker 1>He's been working on this for decades. Uh. And it's

0:54:46.040 --> 0:54:47.839
<v Speaker 1>very hard. It was very hard to get access to it.

0:54:47.880 --> 0:54:49.839
<v Speaker 1>But James has been working on it for a really

0:54:49.840 --> 0:54:52.239
<v Speaker 1>long time. And one is one of the first humans

0:54:52.280 --> 0:54:54.560
<v Speaker 1>to actually have ventured inside. Why is it so hard

0:54:54.560 --> 0:54:56.120
<v Speaker 1>to get access to you can't you just drive up

0:54:56.160 --> 0:54:58.040
<v Speaker 1>and like sneak in. This thing is huge. I just

0:54:58.040 --> 0:54:59.560
<v Speaker 1>want to know, you said first humans? Are you telling

0:54:59.600 --> 0:55:02.359
<v Speaker 1>me like a terrestrial people? I mean, if you've been there,

0:55:02.440 --> 0:55:04.839
<v Speaker 1>that's what it looks like. Well. And also it's very

0:55:04.880 --> 0:55:10.640
<v Speaker 1>close to Area fifty one. Actually, the conspiracy theories, it

0:55:10.760 --> 0:55:14.000
<v Speaker 1>is around three hours north of Las Vegas. You've got

0:55:14.000 --> 0:55:15.799
<v Speaker 1>to drive for an hour and a half to a

0:55:15.920 --> 0:55:18.440
<v Speaker 1>small town called Alamo, and then there's a driver who

0:55:18.440 --> 0:55:21.000
<v Speaker 1>picks you up, puts you in a big suv, drives

0:55:21.000 --> 0:55:22.840
<v Speaker 1>you through the desert for another hour and a half

0:55:22.880 --> 0:55:26.279
<v Speaker 1>into something that resembles the middle of nowhere. It's this

0:55:26.480 --> 0:55:30.600
<v Speaker 1>vast Nevada plane with mountain ranges and it's actually on

0:55:30.640 --> 0:55:33.120
<v Speaker 1>a private ranch, so you definitely cannot just sort of

0:55:33.239 --> 0:55:35.759
<v Speaker 1>drive up and see it. And lots of people have

0:55:35.800 --> 0:55:38.239
<v Speaker 1>actually tried, and lots of people have actually failed. But

0:55:38.719 --> 0:55:40.799
<v Speaker 1>the artist Michael Heiser, who's been working on this for

0:55:40.840 --> 0:55:44.680
<v Speaker 1>fifty years, has finally decided that it's open to the public,

0:55:44.719 --> 0:55:48.440
<v Speaker 1>if not complete fifty years, that's incredible. What I what

0:55:48.520 --> 0:55:50.600
<v Speaker 1>I love about that is that he was thinking about

0:55:50.600 --> 0:55:52.839
<v Speaker 1>this before. And I hate to say this, but anyone

0:55:52.880 --> 0:55:55.440
<v Speaker 1>who's traveled anywhere over the last five years, it's like

0:55:55.480 --> 0:55:58.440
<v Speaker 1>just people with their phones taking photos for Instagram. Well,

0:55:58.480 --> 0:56:01.400
<v Speaker 1>I'm like very concerned that's been like this could easily

0:56:01.440 --> 0:56:03.880
<v Speaker 1>turn into that. You don't need to worry because I

0:56:03.920 --> 0:56:07.399
<v Speaker 1>had to sign several legal forms saying that I wasn't

0:56:07.440 --> 0:56:09.960
<v Speaker 1>allowed to take photographs and hey, their photos in here,

0:56:10.000 --> 0:56:12.960
<v Speaker 1>they're great. Yes, well I didn't take them, unfortunately, But

0:56:13.400 --> 0:56:15.680
<v Speaker 1>you know what I what I will say is that

0:56:15.800 --> 0:56:18.040
<v Speaker 1>it is not a place that photographs will because it's

0:56:18.160 --> 0:56:23.200
<v Speaker 1>so vast that it doesn't look cute in shots. But

0:56:23.320 --> 0:56:27.560
<v Speaker 1>when you're there, the actual experience of being there is overwhelming.

0:56:27.600 --> 0:56:29.239
<v Speaker 1>So describe it for us. What is it, what does

0:56:29.280 --> 0:56:30.799
<v Speaker 1>it look like, and what does it feel like, so

0:56:31.440 --> 0:56:34.400
<v Speaker 1>you drive up to this ranch and it doesn't actually

0:56:34.480 --> 0:56:36.719
<v Speaker 1>look like very much when you get there, because the

0:56:36.760 --> 0:56:39.920
<v Speaker 1>majority of this structure, which is over a mile and

0:56:39.920 --> 0:56:42.319
<v Speaker 1>a half long, half a mile wide, right, I mean

0:56:42.360 --> 0:56:45.680
<v Speaker 1>this is more than half of Central Park. So you

0:56:45.800 --> 0:56:48.600
<v Speaker 1>get there and the majority of it has been excavated,

0:56:48.719 --> 0:56:51.560
<v Speaker 1>so you actually walk down into it and it's these

0:56:51.719 --> 0:56:58.880
<v Speaker 1>undulating rolling valleys and crescents and stadia um covered in

0:56:58.960 --> 0:57:02.680
<v Speaker 1>two different kinds of ground ale with these concrete curbs

0:57:02.719 --> 0:57:05.200
<v Speaker 1>that are sort of decorative but also sort of delineate

0:57:05.280 --> 0:57:08.040
<v Speaker 1>large pebbles from small pebbles. It's very weird. And then

0:57:08.080 --> 0:57:11.480
<v Speaker 1>there are two colossal and when I say colossal, actually

0:57:11.520 --> 0:57:15.200
<v Speaker 1>mean colossal, but the word is thrown around quite casually

0:57:15.239 --> 0:57:18.880
<v Speaker 1>these days. But these things are seventy feet high, I

0:57:18.880 --> 0:57:22.560
<v Speaker 1>mean humongous. These sculptures at either end, and the entire

0:57:22.560 --> 0:57:24.440
<v Speaker 1>work can be conceived of as a sculpture too, So

0:57:24.680 --> 0:57:27.640
<v Speaker 1>you just sort of wander through for hours. I mean,

0:57:27.680 --> 0:57:30.000
<v Speaker 1>it takes a really long time to get from one

0:57:30.080 --> 0:57:32.000
<v Speaker 1>end to the other, and it's this kind of all

0:57:32.160 --> 0:57:36.440
<v Speaker 1>encompassing experience. It's also ever changing, right, because of the materials,

0:57:36.480 --> 0:57:40.000
<v Speaker 1>It's been changed a lot because Michael Heiser keeps changing it.

0:57:40.200 --> 0:57:43.200
<v Speaker 1>But the idea is actually that it's going to stay

0:57:43.200 --> 0:57:45.840
<v Speaker 1>basically the same. A lot of it is concrete. It

0:57:45.920 --> 0:57:50.160
<v Speaker 1>has around a million dollar operating budget every year to

0:57:50.240 --> 0:57:52.720
<v Speaker 1>just maintain the place. It's supposed to stay the way

0:57:52.720 --> 0:57:56.240
<v Speaker 1>that it is. That being said, Nevada and the Nevada

0:57:56.320 --> 0:58:00.160
<v Speaker 1>Desert is a pretty harsh place, and so invariably things

0:58:00.200 --> 0:58:02.000
<v Speaker 1>are going to happen to it that sort of change

0:58:02.040 --> 0:58:03.880
<v Speaker 1>the way that it looks and feels. So Heiser is

0:58:03.880 --> 0:58:06.680
<v Speaker 1>part of of the land art movement, right, and some

0:58:07.120 --> 0:58:09.280
<v Speaker 1>land ar is meant to decay and fade away like

0:58:09.320 --> 0:58:11.960
<v Speaker 1>spiral jetty. People might be familiar with. Tell us a

0:58:12.000 --> 0:58:14.640
<v Speaker 1>little bit about the movements. Um and then also what

0:58:14.720 --> 0:58:19.360
<v Speaker 1>these sculptures look like. It's very interesting because in pictures

0:58:19.360 --> 0:58:22.160
<v Speaker 1>they look like something really specific. They look like kind

0:58:22.200 --> 0:58:25.640
<v Speaker 1>of giant sort of abstract chess pieces or sun dials.

0:58:25.800 --> 0:58:30.920
<v Speaker 1>They're like triangles, exactly triangle squares modern day stonehegees, Yeah,

0:58:31.600 --> 0:58:33.760
<v Speaker 1>And then there's another sculpture that sort of looks like

0:58:33.800 --> 0:58:37.200
<v Speaker 1>this really long bunker, and then there's this other part

0:58:37.280 --> 0:58:39.800
<v Speaker 1>that sort of looks like a pyramid. But then you

0:58:39.880 --> 0:58:42.720
<v Speaker 1>get there, and it's reminiscent of all of these things.

0:58:42.840 --> 0:58:46.440
<v Speaker 1>So there's but it actually doesn't look like anything that

0:58:46.520 --> 0:58:49.360
<v Speaker 1>you've seen before, which is obviously a bit of a

0:58:49.400 --> 0:58:52.600
<v Speaker 1>trial to explain it to people with without the photographs.

0:58:52.600 --> 0:58:57.720
<v Speaker 1>But in reality it looks otherworldly but also like this

0:58:57.960 --> 0:59:02.240
<v Speaker 1>incredible monumental relic. What's pretty amazing about this, James, is

0:59:02.280 --> 0:59:05.160
<v Speaker 1>that you said he's been working on it since nineteen seventy.

0:59:05.720 --> 0:59:08.120
<v Speaker 1>It's still not done in his mind. It's not, but

0:59:08.160 --> 0:59:10.880
<v Speaker 1>it feels pretty complete when you got there. What's not

0:59:10.920 --> 0:59:13.360
<v Speaker 1>done about it in his mind? Um? I think that

0:59:13.560 --> 0:59:16.720
<v Speaker 1>so he didn't have a master plan, so he as

0:59:16.720 --> 0:59:19.880
<v Speaker 1>you got more money, or as you got any money, um,

0:59:19.920 --> 0:59:23.640
<v Speaker 1>he would periodically updated and expand it, and it would grow.

0:59:23.720 --> 0:59:28.240
<v Speaker 1>There wasn't a sort of overarching strategy for it, and

0:59:28.280 --> 0:59:30.160
<v Speaker 1>I think in his mind it can keep growing in

0:59:30.240 --> 0:59:32.960
<v Speaker 1>a sort of organic way and he can keep modifying

0:59:33.360 --> 0:59:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the existing parts of it once it actually continues to expand.

0:59:37.480 --> 0:59:39.800
<v Speaker 1>That being said, um, a lot of people seem to

0:59:39.800 --> 0:59:43.480
<v Speaker 1>feel that it's done, and being there myself, it definitely

0:59:43.480 --> 0:59:47.400
<v Speaker 1>felt like a cogent, sort of clear work of art.

0:59:47.560 --> 0:59:49.440
<v Speaker 1>And sorry, if you want to go see it what

0:59:49.600 --> 0:59:52.960
<v Speaker 1>this year because she can't. Well, so a couple of

0:59:52.960 --> 0:59:54.920
<v Speaker 1>thousand people applied in the first week that it was

0:59:55.200 --> 0:59:57.320
<v Speaker 1>said to be open. Six people can visit it at

0:59:57.240 --> 1:00:00.960
<v Speaker 1>a time, no more per his instructions, um and something

1:00:01.000 --> 1:00:04.320
<v Speaker 1>for the masses everybody. Well, you know, and it feels

1:00:04.320 --> 1:00:06.600
<v Speaker 1>like it should be. But I understand. Yeah, the thing

1:00:06.680 --> 1:00:09.680
<v Speaker 1>is that you want to be there by yourself. Like

1:00:10.200 --> 1:00:12.720
<v Speaker 1>the minute that becomes an amusement park is the minute

1:00:12.760 --> 1:00:17.000
<v Speaker 1>it doesn't have this kind of other worldly sense of contemplation.

1:00:17.280 --> 1:00:19.280
<v Speaker 1>What is it costs that negotiate around a hundred and

1:00:19.280 --> 1:00:24.200
<v Speaker 1>fifty dollars for general tickets in theory, but currently they're

1:00:24.240 --> 1:00:27.880
<v Speaker 1>not really charging anyone anything to show up, and anyone

1:00:27.920 --> 1:00:29.960
<v Speaker 1>in the surrounding counties can go for free. All right.

1:00:30.000 --> 1:00:31.960
<v Speaker 1>I would love to actually just keep talking about this,

1:00:32.040 --> 1:00:33.200
<v Speaker 1>but I do feel like we have to go from

1:00:33.240 --> 1:00:36.400
<v Speaker 1>those massive monuments to the elite buildings known as co ops,

1:00:36.440 --> 1:00:42.960
<v Speaker 1>a different kind of monument in some people's minds. Tell

1:00:43.040 --> 1:00:45.920
<v Speaker 1>us about this story, Well, how come co ops, Chris,

1:00:45.920 --> 1:00:48.680
<v Speaker 1>This is a bit of a city and country especial.

1:00:48.760 --> 1:00:52.200
<v Speaker 1>We've we've reviewed two hotels where and Michael Heiser's artwork

1:00:52.240 --> 1:00:55.560
<v Speaker 1>is called city. It's and uh so we thought, really,

1:00:55.640 --> 1:00:58.840
<v Speaker 1>let's get into um commentary on the city, and then like,

1:00:58.920 --> 1:01:01.800
<v Speaker 1>let's do our own commentary on the city. And these

1:01:01.800 --> 1:01:04.440
<v Speaker 1>are perceived to be relics from a different time. So

1:01:04.560 --> 1:01:08.280
<v Speaker 1>just generally speaking, the kind of best co ops in

1:01:08.320 --> 1:01:10.200
<v Speaker 1>New York City or on the Upper East Side and

1:01:10.320 --> 1:01:12.920
<v Speaker 1>on Central Park West on the West Side, and they

1:01:13.280 --> 1:01:17.439
<v Speaker 1>are places that are owned by their shareholders, which means

1:01:17.440 --> 1:01:19.640
<v Speaker 1>that everyone who lives in these buildings has a financial

1:01:19.640 --> 1:01:23.760
<v Speaker 1>responsibility to maintain them. And what that has ultimately led

1:01:23.800 --> 1:01:29.200
<v Speaker 1>to for decades is super super super restrictive entry requirements

1:01:29.280 --> 1:01:31.320
<v Speaker 1>to actually get in, and the co upboard can just

1:01:31.360 --> 1:01:35.360
<v Speaker 1>say no, they can't be a part of ours. But

1:01:35.600 --> 1:01:37.280
<v Speaker 1>this is a thing that people outside of New York

1:01:37.320 --> 1:01:39.560
<v Speaker 1>City have no idea how how they work. I mean,

1:01:39.600 --> 1:01:42.520
<v Speaker 1>we're talking about buildings where you have to pay in

1:01:42.560 --> 1:01:45.720
<v Speaker 1>all cash in order to actually buy a place there,

1:01:45.720 --> 1:01:47.800
<v Speaker 1>and you're not even actually buying the place, you're buying

1:01:47.840 --> 1:01:50.160
<v Speaker 1>shares in the building. And to be clear, all cash

1:01:50.240 --> 1:01:52.560
<v Speaker 1>to the tune of tens of millions of dollars, and

1:01:52.640 --> 1:01:55.280
<v Speaker 1>oftentimes there's a requirement that you have tens of million

1:01:55.320 --> 1:01:57.920
<v Speaker 1>dollars left in your bank account. What's great about that

1:01:58.000 --> 1:02:00.400
<v Speaker 1>is what's great about that is um it comes with

1:02:00.560 --> 1:02:03.120
<v Speaker 1>all these amenities, usually like a brand new pool, a

1:02:03.200 --> 1:02:07.280
<v Speaker 1>state of the art gym, was right right right? Yeah?

1:02:07.400 --> 1:02:10.880
<v Speaker 1>Terrorist none of that? Wait what no central air all

1:02:10.880 --> 1:02:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the time? That would be that would be this is insane,

1:02:15.080 --> 1:02:17.280
<v Speaker 1>This is completely crazy. Didn't a co op turn down

1:02:17.280 --> 1:02:23.680
<v Speaker 1>Madonna way? That's the Bearsford famously famously fun. That being said,

1:02:24.040 --> 1:02:27.360
<v Speaker 1>this is not a piece about how awful co ops are.

1:02:27.480 --> 1:02:30.320
<v Speaker 1>This is a piece about how co ops, very very

1:02:30.360 --> 1:02:33.200
<v Speaker 1>slowly have sort of woken up and realized that they

1:02:33.240 --> 1:02:35.760
<v Speaker 1>are being left in the dust by super high end

1:02:35.760 --> 1:02:39.080
<v Speaker 1>condominiums where you just simply own your apartment out right,

1:02:39.400 --> 1:02:44.440
<v Speaker 1>very different less restrictions, and co ops have basically decided

1:02:44.480 --> 1:02:47.360
<v Speaker 1>that they are going to lower the entry requirements ever

1:02:47.440 --> 1:02:50.520
<v Speaker 1>so slightly in an effort to not only raise their

1:02:50.560 --> 1:02:54.200
<v Speaker 1>property values but also get a different generation of people inside.

1:02:54.320 --> 1:02:56.920
<v Speaker 1>Hence the co op flip flip flap. Even co op

1:02:56.960 --> 1:02:58.720
<v Speaker 1>flip flaps say that five times fast. But hey, we

1:02:58.800 --> 1:03:00.640
<v Speaker 1>only have about a minute or so, Chris, what else

1:03:00.720 --> 1:03:02.600
<v Speaker 1>is in h I know there's a place Tim is

1:03:02.680 --> 1:03:04.400
<v Speaker 1>dying to go to that I'm not going to be

1:03:04.400 --> 1:03:07.240
<v Speaker 1>able to go okay, So there's We have two hotel reviews.

1:03:07.280 --> 1:03:10.120
<v Speaker 1>The first is Wildflower Farm, which is a new Oh

1:03:10.120 --> 1:03:14.040
<v Speaker 1>Bears resort upstate, which is uh a, it's a sort

1:03:14.040 --> 1:03:16.320
<v Speaker 1>of a working farm. You can go feed chickens, you

1:03:16.320 --> 1:03:19.280
<v Speaker 1>can go feed pigs. Are Jim Gaddy went and reviewed

1:03:19.280 --> 1:03:22.360
<v Speaker 1>it said it's very luxurious. You can spend a thousand

1:03:22.400 --> 1:03:25.520
<v Speaker 1>dollars a night to feed those those chickens. And then

1:03:25.880 --> 1:03:29.360
<v Speaker 1>Hannah Elliott, who is, as you know, the coolest person

1:03:29.400 --> 1:03:31.640
<v Speaker 1>in the world, who's also nice. Um, we had her

1:03:31.680 --> 1:03:34.560
<v Speaker 1>fly into from l A to review the Chelsea Hotel,

1:03:34.680 --> 1:03:38.240
<v Speaker 1>which is which has been resurrected. It's still full of ghosts.

1:03:38.280 --> 1:03:41.320
<v Speaker 1>It's you know, the famous hotel where Arthur Miller stay,

1:03:41.400 --> 1:03:44.680
<v Speaker 1>Leonard Cohen, Patti Smith and Robert and Robert Mayblethorpe were

1:03:45.360 --> 1:03:48.040
<v Speaker 1>roommates there. It's been closed for many years and being

1:03:48.200 --> 1:03:50.680
<v Speaker 1>been been renovated. It's been a hundred million dollars renovating

1:03:50.680 --> 1:03:52.680
<v Speaker 1>it and now it's it's this kind of combo of

1:03:52.760 --> 1:03:57.720
<v Speaker 1>glamorous and also kind of crappy, like it really feels

1:03:57.720 --> 1:04:00.600
<v Speaker 1>like it should be uh and handled loved it and

1:04:01.240 --> 1:04:04.800
<v Speaker 1>rooms there started at about a night, so it's a

1:04:04.800 --> 1:04:07.200
<v Speaker 1>little cheaper than the wild Flower. Oh my god, what

1:04:07.240 --> 1:04:09.240
<v Speaker 1>a great section. You guys really loved it and loved

1:04:09.280 --> 1:04:11.400
<v Speaker 1>reading through and it. Thank you so much. Yeah, big

1:04:11.440 --> 1:04:13.840
<v Speaker 1>thank you to Bloomberg Business Week Arts columns James Tarmy

1:04:13.880 --> 1:04:16.720
<v Speaker 1>and Bloomberg Pursuits editor Chris Rouser. Thanks so much, guys,

1:04:16.760 --> 1:04:18.600
<v Speaker 1>And that wraps up the weekend edition to Bloomberg Business

1:04:18.640 --> 1:04:21.120
<v Speaker 1>Week from Bloomberg Radio. I'm Carol Master, thanks so much

1:04:21.120 --> 1:04:23.040
<v Speaker 1>for joining us, and I'm Tim Snanovik. Be sure to

1:04:23.080 --> 1:04:25.520
<v Speaker 1>tune into Bloomberg Business Week Monday through Friday, starting at

1:04:25.520 --> 1:04:27.880
<v Speaker 1>two pm Wall Street Time on Bloomberg Radio. You can

1:04:27.880 --> 1:04:30.640
<v Speaker 1>also watch our daily broadcast on YouTube. Just search Bloomberg

1:04:30.680 --> 1:04:33.160
<v Speaker 1>Global News and check out our Bloomberg Business Week podcast.

1:04:33.200 --> 1:04:35.160
<v Speaker 1>You can find that at Bloomberg dot com, Apple, or

1:04:35.160 --> 1:04:37.920
<v Speaker 1>wherever you get your podcast. Bloomberg Business Week is available

1:04:37.920 --> 1:04:40.280
<v Speaker 1>on newstands now, at Bloomberg dot com and on the

1:04:40.280 --> 1:04:42.920
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Terminal. You can also see me on Bloomberg Quick Take,

1:04:42.960 --> 1:04:45.840
<v Speaker 1>available on Bloomberg dot com, slash qt, and streaming platforms

1:04:45.840 --> 1:04:48.360
<v Speaker 1>like Roku, Apple TV, Samsung TV, and more. Have a

1:04:48.400 --> 1:04:51.080
<v Speaker 1>great weekend, everyone day, say this, this Bloomberg