WEBVTT - Hawaiian Air's Quality and Local Routes Will Offset Southwest, CEO Says

0:00:05.800 --> 0:00:08.720
<v Speaker 1>Welcome to the Bloomberg P and L Podcast. I'm pim Fox.

0:00:08.760 --> 0:00:11.560
<v Speaker 1>Along with my co host Lisa Abramowitz. Each day we

0:00:11.640 --> 0:00:15.120
<v Speaker 1>bring you the most important, noteworthy, and useful interviews for

0:00:15.200 --> 0:00:17.840
<v Speaker 1>you and your money, whether you're at the grocery store

0:00:17.960 --> 0:00:20.720
<v Speaker 1>or the trading floor. Find the Bloomberg P M L

0:00:20.840 --> 0:00:32.200
<v Speaker 1>Podcast on Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud, and Bloomberg dot com. Well,

0:00:32.240 --> 0:00:34.519
<v Speaker 1>I want to turn our attention now to the airline industry,

0:00:34.520 --> 0:00:38.680
<v Speaker 1>and specifically to Hawaiian Airlines. The president and chief executive

0:00:38.720 --> 0:00:41.800
<v Speaker 1>of Hawaiian Holdings joins us now, Mark Dunkley. Mark, always

0:00:41.800 --> 0:00:43.879
<v Speaker 1>a pleasure to speak with you. UM. I want to

0:00:43.880 --> 0:00:47.360
<v Speaker 1>set this stage back in July during the the earnings

0:00:47.360 --> 0:00:49.839
<v Speaker 1>conference call, and I just want to parenthetically say, I

0:00:49.880 --> 0:00:53.040
<v Speaker 1>know that you're going to be releasing your results next Thursday,

0:00:53.080 --> 0:00:55.960
<v Speaker 1>so you're a priet period, so UM, you know you

0:00:56.000 --> 0:00:57.800
<v Speaker 1>can kind of do the air quotes and we'll make

0:00:57.840 --> 0:01:01.560
<v Speaker 1>believe we understand what you're saying. But on the conference

0:01:01.600 --> 0:01:05.839
<v Speaker 1>call last quarter, you talked about things like the extra

0:01:05.920 --> 0:01:11.400
<v Speaker 1>comfort seats UH, the new A three NEOs from air Bush,

0:01:11.480 --> 0:01:14.640
<v Speaker 1>the relocation at the loss at the at L a X,

0:01:14.959 --> 0:01:20.160
<v Speaker 1>also first route expansion, because of the new aircraft. Now

0:01:20.200 --> 0:01:22.080
<v Speaker 1>I'm an invest not me, but i'm you know, an

0:01:22.080 --> 0:01:25.400
<v Speaker 1>investor comes to the call next Thursday and says, yeah,

0:01:25.400 --> 0:01:28.480
<v Speaker 1>but wait, the stock is down thirty this year. What

0:01:28.680 --> 0:01:33.319
<v Speaker 1>is happening? How? What can you say given the quiet period,

0:01:33.600 --> 0:01:36.480
<v Speaker 1>in order to at least make people not go bananas

0:01:36.480 --> 0:01:39.479
<v Speaker 1>when they when they get on the call. Yeah, well,

0:01:39.520 --> 0:01:41.399
<v Speaker 1>I think you know, when you look at our share

0:01:41.440 --> 0:01:44.040
<v Speaker 1>price performance over last several years, we were this sort

0:01:44.040 --> 0:01:49.000
<v Speaker 1>of bell of the industry. UM, seeing our stock appreciate. Uh.

0:01:49.040 --> 0:01:51.760
<v Speaker 1>In the last couple of months, there have been too

0:01:52.600 --> 0:01:56.840
<v Speaker 1>prominent announcements by competitors that they're going to add capacity

0:01:56.840 --> 0:02:00.000
<v Speaker 1>in our market. And that's clearly weighing Southwest for example,

0:02:00.560 --> 0:02:03.440
<v Speaker 1>Southwest has one and united with the other a couple

0:02:03.440 --> 0:02:06.120
<v Speaker 1>of months ago. UM. I think the things to to

0:02:06.200 --> 0:02:09.480
<v Speaker 1>look to though, are a couple of factors. One is

0:02:09.520 --> 0:02:12.960
<v Speaker 1>that we continue to talk with great confidence about the

0:02:13.000 --> 0:02:16.360
<v Speaker 1>superior superiority of our product. The fact that you know,

0:02:16.400 --> 0:02:19.480
<v Speaker 1>for for what we do, which is uh, flying to

0:02:19.520 --> 0:02:23.360
<v Speaker 1>Hawaiian selling, Hawaii's a destination around the world. Uh, nobody's

0:02:23.400 --> 0:02:25.240
<v Speaker 1>got a better formula than we do. And we we

0:02:25.320 --> 0:02:28.480
<v Speaker 1>frankly wouldn't trade places with with any of our competitors,

0:02:28.960 --> 0:02:31.400
<v Speaker 1>and you know, we're sort of backing up that confidence

0:02:31.440 --> 0:02:33.639
<v Speaker 1>as recently as a couple of days ago, we announced

0:02:33.800 --> 0:02:37.119
<v Speaker 1>a quarterly dividend that we're going to pay um and that's,

0:02:37.200 --> 0:02:40.160
<v Speaker 1>you know, very deliberately to to send a signal to

0:02:40.200 --> 0:02:43.280
<v Speaker 1>say that, you know, at least looking into the long term,

0:02:43.919 --> 0:02:48.000
<v Speaker 1>looking beyond what may happen with additional capacity coming in

0:02:48.040 --> 0:02:50.720
<v Speaker 1>next year, looking to the long term. We're in the

0:02:50.720 --> 0:02:53.760
<v Speaker 1>management team and the board of directors have great confidence

0:02:53.760 --> 0:02:57.120
<v Speaker 1>in our franchise. Okay, So, and the dividend what the

0:02:57.200 --> 0:02:59.200
<v Speaker 1>twelve centsers share, So that's like one in a quarter

0:02:59.280 --> 0:03:02.560
<v Speaker 1>percent based on today's a stock price of thirty eight dollars.

0:03:03.480 --> 0:03:06.840
<v Speaker 1>Can you maybe just describe to people the franchise that

0:03:06.960 --> 0:03:11.200
<v Speaker 1>you have inter Island and how perhaps the revenue from

0:03:11.280 --> 0:03:15.080
<v Speaker 1>that franchise almost offers a kind of annuity to the

0:03:15.160 --> 0:03:19.840
<v Speaker 1>business that other airlines may not have. Uh yeah, we

0:03:20.000 --> 0:03:22.640
<v Speaker 1>we we account for about eighty five of all the

0:03:22.680 --> 0:03:25.440
<v Speaker 1>travel between the islands of the state of Hawaii. And

0:03:25.480 --> 0:03:27.680
<v Speaker 1>for the for your listeners who may not be as

0:03:27.720 --> 0:03:30.680
<v Speaker 1>familiar with Hawaii, is that certainly like to be Um,

0:03:31.080 --> 0:03:33.200
<v Speaker 1>what I can say is it's a bigger business than

0:03:33.440 --> 0:03:36.920
<v Speaker 1>than people perhaps have in mind. I mean, we we

0:03:37.040 --> 0:03:40.520
<v Speaker 1>fly thirty two times a day in each direction between

0:03:40.560 --> 0:03:42.760
<v Speaker 1>Honolulu and Maui. Just to give you a sense of

0:03:42.760 --> 0:03:46.400
<v Speaker 1>the scale. We carry more passengers between Honolulu and can

0:03:46.640 --> 0:03:52.080
<v Speaker 1>Louis than all airlines combined fly between Washington National U

0:03:52.360 --> 0:03:56.040
<v Speaker 1>and LaGuardia Airports in New York. So it's a pretty

0:03:56.080 --> 0:04:01.400
<v Speaker 1>big business. We have eighty five or thereabouts of that market.

0:04:01.560 --> 0:04:04.800
<v Speaker 1>And it's a business that that sort of carries everyday

0:04:04.800 --> 0:04:09.600
<v Speaker 1>life here, school groups, people going to see their the doctors,

0:04:10.400 --> 0:04:13.160
<v Speaker 1>things like that. So it tends to have pretty low

0:04:13.640 --> 0:04:16.680
<v Speaker 1>price elastics you've demand and pretty low income elastics. You've

0:04:16.760 --> 0:04:21.520
<v Speaker 1>demat tell us a little bit about Japan Airlines alliances

0:04:21.560 --> 0:04:26.000
<v Speaker 1>and the new routes from Haneda and Narita. Well, you know,

0:04:26.040 --> 0:04:28.880
<v Speaker 1>you've followed our story for for a long time, and

0:04:29.800 --> 0:04:33.560
<v Speaker 1>as your listeners may perhaps again not appreciate fully, Um,

0:04:34.000 --> 0:04:36.400
<v Speaker 1>the bulk of our expansion over the last seven years,

0:04:36.440 --> 0:04:38.920
<v Speaker 1>and we've could roupled in size during that period of time.

0:04:38.960 --> 0:04:43.279
<v Speaker 1>That the bulk of that has come from expanding around

0:04:43.320 --> 0:04:48.480
<v Speaker 1>the Pacific room most prominently to Japan. And three three

0:04:48.600 --> 0:04:53.240
<v Speaker 1>or so weeks ago, we announced a relationship with Japan Airlines,

0:04:53.320 --> 0:04:56.160
<v Speaker 1>which is one of the world's absolute best airlines and

0:04:56.200 --> 0:05:01.200
<v Speaker 1>means a quality, quality company. Uh. And together we're going

0:05:01.240 --> 0:05:04.560
<v Speaker 1>to in the first instance, be code sharing and um

0:05:05.200 --> 0:05:09.599
<v Speaker 1>uh you know, doing those kinds of cooperative activities. But

0:05:09.600 --> 0:05:12.920
<v Speaker 1>but we're also both committed to seeking to enter into

0:05:12.920 --> 0:05:17.680
<v Speaker 1>a joint venture which we believe will it improve choices

0:05:17.720 --> 0:05:21.640
<v Speaker 1>to customers and also make us better able to compete

0:05:21.640 --> 0:05:25.000
<v Speaker 1>in the market and better for our company. If not

0:05:25.160 --> 0:05:27.440
<v Speaker 1>that you get to choose between seven eight sevens and

0:05:27.600 --> 0:05:30.960
<v Speaker 1>are NEOs. I know that that's been an issue, but

0:05:31.000 --> 0:05:34.880
<v Speaker 1>the trend is what to have aircraft that are more economical,

0:05:34.960 --> 0:05:38.120
<v Speaker 1>that can fly longer, such as even you know, the

0:05:38.480 --> 0:05:42.719
<v Speaker 1>the new seven three seven Max. Right. Yeah, we're taking

0:05:42.760 --> 0:05:45.120
<v Speaker 1>delivery in a couple of weeks time of our first

0:05:45.240 --> 0:05:49.000
<v Speaker 1>A three twenty one near which is a narrow body

0:05:49.360 --> 0:05:52.480
<v Speaker 1>UM in its class. It is the most fuel efficient

0:05:52.640 --> 0:05:55.440
<v Speaker 1>narrow body best suited for the markets that we're going

0:05:55.480 --> 0:05:59.080
<v Speaker 1>to fly with it, which is the small markets between

0:05:59.080 --> 0:06:03.640
<v Speaker 1>the US West Post and Hawaii. Uh. It is it's

0:06:03.640 --> 0:06:07.440
<v Speaker 1>a new breed of airplane and both Boeing and airbus

0:06:08.000 --> 0:06:10.920
<v Speaker 1>have airplanes a fit in that category, this particular one

0:06:11.240 --> 0:06:16.200
<v Speaker 1>for this particular mission. Uh, the near by airbus is

0:06:16.800 --> 0:06:19.160
<v Speaker 1>head and shoulders the superior airplane for the route. So

0:06:19.200 --> 0:06:21.320
<v Speaker 1>maybe just step back for a second and as someone

0:06:21.400 --> 0:06:24.600
<v Speaker 1>that's a veteran in the industry, what does an aircraft

0:06:24.800 --> 0:06:29.719
<v Speaker 1>like that and even the Boeing Max what does that

0:06:29.839 --> 0:06:32.440
<v Speaker 1>Due to the sort of whole strategy of where you fly,

0:06:32.680 --> 0:06:37.240
<v Speaker 1>how you fly, and how you allocate the fleet. We

0:06:37.279 --> 0:06:40.200
<v Speaker 1>spent a lot of time on that on that very question.

0:06:40.240 --> 0:06:42.599
<v Speaker 1>I mean, you know, costs are sort of everything in

0:06:42.600 --> 0:06:44.719
<v Speaker 1>the airline business, and finding the right aircraft of the

0:06:44.800 --> 0:06:49.360
<v Speaker 1>right roots and the right size is a paramount importance. Um.

0:06:49.800 --> 0:06:53.560
<v Speaker 1>You know for for many airlines, uh, they're blending their needs.

0:06:53.640 --> 0:06:57.360
<v Speaker 1>You know, they fly roots that are two hundred miles,

0:06:57.360 --> 0:07:01.400
<v Speaker 1>five hundred miles, thousand and three thousand miles and they

0:07:01.400 --> 0:07:04.839
<v Speaker 1>have to find aircraft that are sort of the ideal

0:07:04.880 --> 0:07:07.719
<v Speaker 1>compromised for all of those routes. What's I think pretty

0:07:07.760 --> 0:07:11.200
<v Speaker 1>unique about Hawaiian uh is that we have a very

0:07:11.200 --> 0:07:13.840
<v Speaker 1>shorthaul business between the islands, just one or two hundred

0:07:13.960 --> 0:07:18.640
<v Speaker 1>uticle miles. Then we have nothing until auticle miles where

0:07:18.680 --> 0:07:22.920
<v Speaker 1>we have almost half of our business is between the

0:07:23.000 --> 0:07:27.200
<v Speaker 1>US West Coast and Hawaii. UH, and then beyond that

0:07:27.280 --> 0:07:30.160
<v Speaker 1>we go to eight to ten hour up to almost

0:07:30.280 --> 0:07:35.320
<v Speaker 1>twelve flights. So we have these very specific needs, UM,

0:07:35.400 --> 0:07:38.239
<v Speaker 1>and a lot of time and attention goes into choosing

0:07:38.240 --> 0:07:40.840
<v Speaker 1>the aircraft that's right for the needs. And both air

0:07:40.880 --> 0:07:44.480
<v Speaker 1>framers a bus and going make terrific airplanes, as do

0:07:44.600 --> 0:07:48.160
<v Speaker 1>the engine manufacturers who power them. I want to thank

0:07:48.160 --> 0:07:50.600
<v Speaker 1>you very much for spending time with us. Mark Dunkley

0:07:50.760 --> 0:07:53.320
<v Speaker 1>is the president and the chief executive of Hawaiian Holdings

0:07:53.840 --> 0:07:58.400
<v Speaker 1>that is the ut parent company of Hawaiian Airlines, and

0:07:58.600 --> 0:08:12.840
<v Speaker 1>they will be releasing their results next Thursday. Our next

0:08:12.880 --> 0:08:15.600
<v Speaker 1>guest is Rick Lazio. He is the senior vice president

0:08:15.680 --> 0:08:18.360
<v Speaker 1>of Aliant Group. He's the former US representative from the

0:08:18.440 --> 0:08:22.600
<v Speaker 1>York serving in Congress from to two thousand and one.

0:08:22.960 --> 0:08:26.400
<v Speaker 1>Representative Lazio, thank you very much for being with us. UM.

0:08:26.400 --> 0:08:28.600
<v Speaker 1>I wonder if you can just get your response to

0:08:28.960 --> 0:08:32.640
<v Speaker 1>UH comments made earlier today on Bloomberg Television. Larry Summers,

0:08:32.760 --> 0:08:36.240
<v Speaker 1>former Treasury Secretary, was speaking with David Weston and Alex Steel,

0:08:36.320 --> 0:08:38.760
<v Speaker 1>and he said, I believe that when you put something

0:08:38.840 --> 0:08:41.400
<v Speaker 1>forth called tax plan, it has to be described in

0:08:41.440 --> 0:08:44.160
<v Speaker 1>a way where people can figure out what their taxes

0:08:44.160 --> 0:08:47.880
<v Speaker 1>would be under it. You need some data, and he says,

0:08:48.040 --> 0:08:52.599
<v Speaker 1>we're operating outside of those parameters. What's your response. My

0:08:52.720 --> 0:08:55.320
<v Speaker 1>response is that the bill hasn't been drafted yet, and

0:08:55.360 --> 0:08:58.760
<v Speaker 1>it will run through committee and those numbers will be

0:08:58.800 --> 0:09:02.720
<v Speaker 1>provided by what's called the Joint Tax Committee in Congress,

0:09:03.400 --> 0:09:07.800
<v Speaker 1>and UH Secretary Summons will have all the data that

0:09:07.840 --> 0:09:11.000
<v Speaker 1>he'd like. I'm sure he's going to have an issue

0:09:11.080 --> 0:09:15.280
<v Speaker 1>with with with the assumptions that are made, but they

0:09:15.320 --> 0:09:17.880
<v Speaker 1>will be plenty of dat it before the bill is

0:09:17.920 --> 0:09:21.160
<v Speaker 1>actually voted on and sent to the President's desk. Okay,

0:09:21.200 --> 0:09:24.239
<v Speaker 1>so understanding that we're going to get more details representative

0:09:24.320 --> 0:09:26.640
<v Speaker 1>Lawso so far the details that we have gotten have

0:09:26.800 --> 0:09:30.359
<v Speaker 1>led to a number of different think tanks to say

0:09:30.400 --> 0:09:33.800
<v Speaker 1>that it could potentially raise taxes on certain middle class

0:09:34.400 --> 0:09:38.239
<v Speaker 1>workers in the United States, and it could potentially provide

0:09:38.360 --> 0:09:43.160
<v Speaker 1>a boon to say hedge funds or independent contractors who

0:09:43.200 --> 0:09:45.720
<v Speaker 1>could claim to be passed through entities. What's your response

0:09:45.760 --> 0:09:48.280
<v Speaker 1>to that. My response to that, again is that we

0:09:48.320 --> 0:09:50.440
<v Speaker 1>have to sort of look at wait for the details

0:09:50.440 --> 0:09:53.079
<v Speaker 1>and see overall how this affects the general economy. The

0:09:53.160 --> 0:09:55.720
<v Speaker 1>name I think the challenge here is how do you

0:09:55.760 --> 0:10:00.840
<v Speaker 1>get growth rates back up to a consistent three cent rate?

0:10:01.120 --> 0:10:05.600
<v Speaker 1>And that is where we've been in past expansions. We've

0:10:05.640 --> 0:10:09.240
<v Speaker 1>been running at to to two since the beginning of

0:10:09.280 --> 0:10:13.360
<v Speaker 1>this expansion, so it's it's suboptimal. The major culprit, and

0:10:13.480 --> 0:10:16.920
<v Speaker 1>my sense of my belief, is a business investment that

0:10:16.960 --> 0:10:20.760
<v Speaker 1>has been holding down both productivity and overall GDP growth,

0:10:20.800 --> 0:10:22.320
<v Speaker 1>And the best way to get at that is to

0:10:22.360 --> 0:10:25.320
<v Speaker 1>incentivize more business investment. And that's partly through things like

0:10:25.360 --> 0:10:28.720
<v Speaker 1>the research and development tax credit and other business incentives,

0:10:28.880 --> 0:10:34.000
<v Speaker 1>as as well as expensing equipment and um and factories

0:10:34.000 --> 0:10:36.840
<v Speaker 1>and the kinds of things that we want businesses to

0:10:36.880 --> 0:10:40.120
<v Speaker 1>invest in. It ultimately to hiring more people and paying

0:10:40.120 --> 0:10:43.120
<v Speaker 1>their workers more more in salary. Understood, So this sort

0:10:43.120 --> 0:10:46.720
<v Speaker 1>of virtuous cycle. But representative laws, how are we able

0:10:46.760 --> 0:10:51.320
<v Speaker 1>to even uh negotiate or discuss a plan that, as

0:10:51.320 --> 0:10:54.520
<v Speaker 1>you say, is missing so many details? And you know,

0:10:54.679 --> 0:10:58.320
<v Speaker 1>is it unusual or unwise to not open it up

0:10:58.440 --> 0:11:02.640
<v Speaker 1>and be more forthcoming during the negotiation phases because normally

0:11:03.080 --> 0:11:06.640
<v Speaker 1>there are more details at this point in the process. Well,

0:11:06.679 --> 0:11:09.560
<v Speaker 1>I think we can talk about what we know so far.

0:11:09.679 --> 0:11:12.480
<v Speaker 1>We know that there is general consensus among Republicans in

0:11:12.520 --> 0:11:15.960
<v Speaker 1>the House and the Senate to collapse rates from seven

0:11:16.040 --> 0:11:18.040
<v Speaker 1>rates down to three and would probably will end up

0:11:18.080 --> 0:11:19.920
<v Speaker 1>being four before all is said and done. We know

0:11:20.000 --> 0:11:22.760
<v Speaker 1>that there is an effort to move towards an extra

0:11:22.840 --> 0:11:26.319
<v Speaker 1>territorial tax system and try and repatriate two and a

0:11:26.320 --> 0:11:29.920
<v Speaker 1>half or three trillion dollars of money that's trapped overseas.

0:11:29.960 --> 0:11:33.760
<v Speaker 1>We know that there's general agreement on reducing the c

0:11:34.000 --> 0:11:36.840
<v Speaker 1>corporate corporate tax rates, and we know that there's going

0:11:36.880 --> 0:11:39.920
<v Speaker 1>to be a extraordinary effort to try and make sure

0:11:39.960 --> 0:11:42.600
<v Speaker 1>that there is some rough parody with pass through entities

0:11:43.000 --> 0:11:46.080
<v Speaker 1>and the small businesses that employ about half of all

0:11:46.120 --> 0:11:51.199
<v Speaker 1>American workers will also see relief. So there are a

0:11:52.200 --> 0:11:56.680
<v Speaker 1>number of very critical pillars to the reform that's being

0:11:56.679 --> 0:11:59.760
<v Speaker 1>put forward that we do know a lot about. Do

0:11:59.800 --> 0:12:02.280
<v Speaker 1>we know exactly what the languages know? Will have to

0:12:02.280 --> 0:12:05.400
<v Speaker 1>wait until that bill is drafted, and it obviously won't

0:12:05.400 --> 0:12:07.800
<v Speaker 1>be voted on until it's drafted. Do you believe it

0:12:07.840 --> 0:12:12.240
<v Speaker 1>whatever bill is drafted and passed should be revenue neutral. Well,

0:12:12.280 --> 0:12:15.240
<v Speaker 1>I believe that they that that Congress and the President

0:12:15.480 --> 0:12:18.640
<v Speaker 1>need to be mindful and realistic about the budget deficite.

0:12:18.640 --> 0:12:21.200
<v Speaker 1>I think that the size of the deficit is a

0:12:21.280 --> 0:12:25.240
<v Speaker 1>threat to future growth, so that yes, that's a that's

0:12:25.280 --> 0:12:27.640
<v Speaker 1>a that's what do I think it needs to be

0:12:27.960 --> 0:12:31.040
<v Speaker 1>revenue neutral? I think they need to look at it

0:12:31.040 --> 0:12:33.319
<v Speaker 1>in terms should we be all able to understand how

0:12:33.360 --> 0:12:36.520
<v Speaker 1>it's going to be paid for? Yes? Of course. Okay,

0:12:36.640 --> 0:12:39.679
<v Speaker 1>then do you believe that threatening sitting senators like the

0:12:39.760 --> 0:12:45.679
<v Speaker 1>Democrat Joe Donnelly from Indiana who is on the committee, UH,

0:12:45.800 --> 0:12:47.960
<v Speaker 1>that the president is going to work for his defeat

0:12:48.000 --> 0:12:50.880
<v Speaker 1>unless he falls into line with the tax plan and

0:12:50.960 --> 0:12:54.480
<v Speaker 1>he's been asking for information about what exactly this is

0:12:54.520 --> 0:12:57.920
<v Speaker 1>going to do to the budget? Does that make any sense?

0:13:00.000 --> 0:13:04.200
<v Speaker 1>I always think that you are better off in the

0:13:04.280 --> 0:13:09.199
<v Speaker 1>long run appealing to somebody's better angels and to persuading

0:13:09.280 --> 0:13:15.319
<v Speaker 1>through positive UH, data and arguments. So you know this

0:13:16.000 --> 0:13:19.280
<v Speaker 1>part of the body politics these days, on both sides,

0:13:19.320 --> 0:13:21.640
<v Speaker 1>they are, of course it is. Do I think it's

0:13:21.679 --> 0:13:25.720
<v Speaker 1>what the way approach I would take. Now, it's not representative. Lazio,

0:13:25.960 --> 0:13:30.560
<v Speaker 1>you represented New York and New York could potentially be

0:13:30.679 --> 0:13:34.120
<v Speaker 1>the one of the bigger losers from this whole plan,

0:13:34.400 --> 0:13:38.839
<v Speaker 1>since the local deductions would be eliminated. What's your view

0:13:38.840 --> 0:13:42.080
<v Speaker 1>on that, Well, it's very difficult to get rates down,

0:13:42.160 --> 0:13:45.240
<v Speaker 1>marginal rates down if you don't address deductions, and then

0:13:45.320 --> 0:13:48.559
<v Speaker 1>one of the largest deductions of state local taxes about

0:13:48.559 --> 0:13:53.280
<v Speaker 1>one point three trillion dollars in revenues revenue lost through that. UM,

0:13:53.320 --> 0:13:55.760
<v Speaker 1>I think if you're from New York, or you're from California,

0:13:55.840 --> 0:13:58.760
<v Speaker 1>from New Jersey, and by the way, those states are

0:13:59.120 --> 0:14:03.280
<v Speaker 1>the are are major consumers of the state and local deduction,

0:14:03.760 --> 0:14:09.120
<v Speaker 1>especially upper income people. I mean about about for example,

0:14:09.520 --> 0:14:14.960
<v Speaker 1>of UM, the benefit for state income taxes and sales

0:14:14.960 --> 0:14:19.160
<v Speaker 1>taxes float for people making over two hundred thousand dollars,

0:14:19.200 --> 0:14:24.080
<v Speaker 1>So this is this would affect mostly upper income people

0:14:24.360 --> 0:14:27.040
<v Speaker 1>in high tax states, and of course California, New York,

0:14:27.040 --> 0:14:30.520
<v Speaker 1>New Jersey are are three of them. UM. If I'm

0:14:30.600 --> 0:14:33.080
<v Speaker 1>in a town hall meeting and I'm talking to a constituent,

0:14:33.280 --> 0:14:35.560
<v Speaker 1>I'm gonna be consistuents going to raise their hand and

0:14:35.640 --> 0:14:38.760
<v Speaker 1>about my state and local taxes, I'd say, well, number one,

0:14:38.920 --> 0:14:41.600
<v Speaker 1>let's see how you do overall. The standard deduction is

0:14:41.600 --> 0:14:46.200
<v Speaker 1>proposed to be doubled um Right now, most Americans don't

0:14:46.240 --> 0:14:51.000
<v Speaker 1>file itemized returns because they get a standard deduction. Even

0:14:51.120 --> 0:14:55.600
<v Speaker 1>fewer Americans will will file itemized returns if the standard

0:14:55.600 --> 0:15:03.040
<v Speaker 1>deduction is doubled to thousands. So it could potentially be

0:15:03.160 --> 0:15:05.600
<v Speaker 1>lesson than people are expected, or it might affect the

0:15:05.680 --> 0:15:08.600
<v Speaker 1>only the wealthiest people. Rick Lazio, I would love to

0:15:08.640 --> 0:15:10.560
<v Speaker 1>continue the conversation. We have to. We have to run

0:15:10.640 --> 0:15:13.960
<v Speaker 1>Rick Lazio as senior vice president for Alliant Group. He

0:15:14.000 --> 0:15:16.520
<v Speaker 1>also was a former US Representative from New York, serving

0:15:16.560 --> 0:15:31.880
<v Speaker 1>Congress from nWo one. Well, the hottest spot in credit

0:15:31.920 --> 0:15:35.880
<v Speaker 1>markets this year is arguably emerging markets credit credit and

0:15:35.880 --> 0:15:39.600
<v Speaker 1>the riskier the better. In fact, Aviva investors just came

0:15:39.640 --> 0:15:43.040
<v Speaker 1>out and so that they view local currency emerging markets

0:15:43.160 --> 0:15:46.400
<v Speaker 1>debt as safer than US treasuries. Here to weigh in

0:15:46.560 --> 0:15:49.680
<v Speaker 1>on what we've been seeing in the emerging market spaces.

0:15:49.720 --> 0:15:53.680
<v Speaker 1>Damian Sasaur fixing come strategist focused on developing markets for

0:15:53.760 --> 0:15:56.120
<v Speaker 1>Bloomberg Intelligence, and he joins us here in our Bloomberg

0:15:56.320 --> 0:16:02.480
<v Speaker 1>eleven three oh studios. Damien does it um Well, I

0:16:02.520 --> 0:16:04.360
<v Speaker 1>don't think it scares me. Per se. I mean, I

0:16:04.400 --> 0:16:07.080
<v Speaker 1>just think it speaks to the state of liquidity and

0:16:07.400 --> 0:16:11.000
<v Speaker 1>developed markets right now and tight spreads, low yields broadly

0:16:11.040 --> 0:16:14.440
<v Speaker 1>speaking across the whole of you know, fixed income. So

0:16:14.480 --> 0:16:16.320
<v Speaker 1>I think there's a lot of cash out there and

0:16:16.360 --> 0:16:17.920
<v Speaker 1>there aren't a lot of places to put it, and

0:16:17.920 --> 0:16:20.520
<v Speaker 1>that's what's driving y AM here. Well, one of the

0:16:20.560 --> 0:16:23.000
<v Speaker 1>places that people are putting it is in the e

0:16:23.200 --> 0:16:25.840
<v Speaker 1>t F e m B. This is the I Shares

0:16:26.280 --> 0:16:30.200
<v Speaker 1>Emerging Markets Debt Fund right this is uh the one

0:16:30.240 --> 0:16:33.720
<v Speaker 1>that JP Morgan has put together, and the fund is

0:16:33.800 --> 0:16:36.160
<v Speaker 1>up more than nine percent so far this year. But here,

0:16:36.200 --> 0:16:37.760
<v Speaker 1>this is what I want you to explain if you

0:16:37.840 --> 0:16:44.000
<v Speaker 1>can um Egypt, El Salvador, Argentina, Hungary, Uh, can you

0:16:44.120 --> 0:16:48.960
<v Speaker 1>explain what it is about these other than the yield? Peru, Poland,

0:16:49.000 --> 0:16:52.440
<v Speaker 1>I could go on Panama. You really, does anybody really

0:16:52.480 --> 0:16:55.320
<v Speaker 1>believe that these are better credits? These are governments now,

0:16:55.400 --> 0:16:58.760
<v Speaker 1>that these are better sovereign credits than the U. S. Treasury? Well, now,

0:16:58.800 --> 0:17:00.360
<v Speaker 1>I mean, I think what you have to get when

0:17:00.400 --> 0:17:03.120
<v Speaker 1>you're evaluating any sovereign issuers, you have to look at

0:17:03.240 --> 0:17:05.920
<v Speaker 1>their current account, their balance sheet, their current account balances.

0:17:05.920 --> 0:17:07.919
<v Speaker 1>You have to look at their external debt exposure, right,

0:17:07.920 --> 0:17:10.240
<v Speaker 1>because when we get into times where, for example, in

0:17:10.240 --> 0:17:13.720
<v Speaker 1>September twenty the Federal Reserve announced that, hey, they're not

0:17:13.760 --> 0:17:16.320
<v Speaker 1>going to be data dependent any longer, they're gonna be hiking.

0:17:16.320 --> 0:17:18.159
<v Speaker 1>And regardless, you know, you have to look at what

0:17:18.240 --> 0:17:21.080
<v Speaker 1>that means for local currencies, and and that means if

0:17:21.119 --> 0:17:23.119
<v Speaker 1>you have a lot of external debt exposure, i e.

0:17:23.359 --> 0:17:25.760
<v Speaker 1>You're hungry and you've issued a lot of US dollar debt,

0:17:26.280 --> 0:17:28.840
<v Speaker 1>you might be in for a little asset liability mismatch

0:17:28.880 --> 0:17:31.120
<v Speaker 1>if things go south on you. And then there's effects reserves,

0:17:31.119 --> 0:17:33.240
<v Speaker 1>there's real effective exchange rates. There's a lot of metrics

0:17:33.280 --> 0:17:35.760
<v Speaker 1>you can look at when you're evaluating sovereign risk exposure,

0:17:36.240 --> 0:17:39.760
<v Speaker 1>but by and large, that is um you know, that

0:17:39.920 --> 0:17:41.600
<v Speaker 1>is basically what investors are looking at, and that's what

0:17:41.760 --> 0:17:46.280
<v Speaker 1>driving returns. I'm struck by the flood of money into

0:17:46.440 --> 0:17:49.560
<v Speaker 1>local currency emerging market step because you're talking about the

0:17:49.560 --> 0:17:53.080
<v Speaker 1>currency exposure, and actually if you look at the flows

0:17:53.200 --> 0:17:55.800
<v Speaker 1>into e m B, which is the US dollar Emerging

0:17:55.840 --> 0:17:59.200
<v Speaker 1>market study t F versus e M l C, which

0:17:59.359 --> 0:18:01.680
<v Speaker 1>is the local currency e M debt, it's the money

0:18:01.720 --> 0:18:04.600
<v Speaker 1>has gone disproportionately to the local currency debt. And I'm

0:18:04.640 --> 0:18:08.639
<v Speaker 1>wondering how much is this completely a wager on the

0:18:08.720 --> 0:18:12.600
<v Speaker 1>dollar staying week and possibly weakening further. Oh, that's exactly

0:18:12.680 --> 0:18:15.640
<v Speaker 1>what it is. I mean, currency attribution for local currency

0:18:15.880 --> 0:18:18.720
<v Speaker 1>government debt from eroaching markets is roughly eight percent of

0:18:18.760 --> 0:18:21.640
<v Speaker 1>the equation, right, So you're absolutely right, it's a play

0:18:21.640 --> 0:18:24.359
<v Speaker 1>on currencies. But this is a more recent occurrence. I

0:18:24.359 --> 0:18:27.560
<v Speaker 1>mean the flows into em into local em rates. Uh,

0:18:27.680 --> 0:18:30.919
<v Speaker 1>that's really only been the last call it six months,

0:18:31.200 --> 0:18:32.440
<v Speaker 1>But for the better part of the last two and

0:18:32.440 --> 0:18:34.640
<v Speaker 1>a half years, you've been seeing flows into hard currency

0:18:34.640 --> 0:18:36.640
<v Speaker 1>e M debt and it's been off the charts. So

0:18:36.800 --> 0:18:40.760
<v Speaker 1>how much would the dollar have to strengthen to cause

0:18:40.800 --> 0:18:44.280
<v Speaker 1>some serious pain? That's a that's a tricky question. I

0:18:44.320 --> 0:18:46.359
<v Speaker 1>mean I can't really say. I know, our our friends

0:18:46.359 --> 0:18:49.920
<v Speaker 1>over in bi economics have basically called for a stronger

0:18:49.960 --> 0:18:52.480
<v Speaker 1>dollar over the better part of you know, well, really

0:18:52.480 --> 0:18:55.520
<v Speaker 1>when the FED starts, you know, uh, you know, rolling off,

0:18:56.040 --> 0:18:58.760
<v Speaker 1>you know, the excess, it's basically tapering, it's it's pulling

0:18:58.760 --> 0:19:01.880
<v Speaker 1>back the balanty, etcetera. I think I think it would

0:19:01.920 --> 0:19:03.800
<v Speaker 1>take quite a bit for you to see things start

0:19:03.880 --> 0:19:05.240
<v Speaker 1>to go, but when they go, that can go in

0:19:05.240 --> 0:19:08.000
<v Speaker 1>a hurry. I'm just looking at the difference in the

0:19:08.080 --> 0:19:11.960
<v Speaker 1>yield between the funds that invest in the local currency

0:19:12.080 --> 0:19:16.280
<v Speaker 1>debt and the hard currency debt of the same nations,

0:19:16.640 --> 0:19:18.840
<v Speaker 1>and you're talking about a spread of anywhere from four

0:19:18.880 --> 0:19:22.119
<v Speaker 1>and a half percent for the hard currency to getting

0:19:22.119 --> 0:19:24.439
<v Speaker 1>maybe a little bit more five and a quarter percent

0:19:24.640 --> 0:19:30.080
<v Speaker 1>for the local currency. UH funds, Is that really are

0:19:30.119 --> 0:19:32.480
<v Speaker 1>you taking more risk when you come when you think

0:19:32.520 --> 0:19:35.040
<v Speaker 1>about the reward? I mean, is seventy five basis points

0:19:35.160 --> 0:19:38.639
<v Speaker 1>really that much in the overall scheme of things that

0:19:38.760 --> 0:19:41.399
<v Speaker 1>you're gonna take that that risk not at all? And

0:19:41.440 --> 0:19:42.879
<v Speaker 1>I think you have to be clear about who the

0:19:42.880 --> 0:19:45.879
<v Speaker 1>constituents of those two industries are, right and eating hard currency,

0:19:45.920 --> 0:19:48.080
<v Speaker 1>You've got a lot of those, you know, single beast

0:19:48.080 --> 0:19:50.560
<v Speaker 1>sovereign names you had mentioned previously, kind of the Iraqs,

0:19:50.600 --> 0:19:53.480
<v Speaker 1>the Turk Medasin, I mean, Kajikistan. I mean like, there's

0:19:53.480 --> 0:19:55.399
<v Speaker 1>been a ton of single beast sovereigns that have come

0:19:55.440 --> 0:19:57.119
<v Speaker 1>to marketing hard currency debt of the better part of

0:19:57.119 --> 0:20:01.879
<v Speaker 1>the last few years. In local currency, UH investable local

0:20:01.920 --> 0:20:05.520
<v Speaker 1>currency government debt from emerging markets there's only a handful.

0:20:05.560 --> 0:20:07.520
<v Speaker 1>I would say, you know, twenty at the most, and

0:20:07.600 --> 0:20:10.760
<v Speaker 1>you're really talking about the majors there. I'm wondering how

0:20:10.880 --> 0:20:14.480
<v Speaker 1>much the investors who are pouring money into emerging markets

0:20:14.560 --> 0:20:17.560
<v Speaker 1>right now are looking at these specific countries and their

0:20:17.600 --> 0:20:21.200
<v Speaker 1>respective issues, and how much is coming in through broad

0:20:21.280 --> 0:20:23.679
<v Speaker 1>market index funds. The reason why I ask is because

0:20:23.880 --> 0:20:26.000
<v Speaker 1>it's sort of disingenuous for us to sort of lump

0:20:26.080 --> 0:20:28.959
<v Speaker 1>a whole vast swath of countries together as just emerging

0:20:28.960 --> 0:20:32.480
<v Speaker 1>markets and to view them completely unilaterally. I mean, do

0:20:32.520 --> 0:20:36.080
<v Speaker 1>you feel like people are delineating between better credits and

0:20:36.240 --> 0:20:38.640
<v Speaker 1>worst credits? No? I don't think they are at all.

0:20:38.680 --> 0:20:41.400
<v Speaker 1>I think it's as you said, I think it's passive investment.

0:20:41.440 --> 0:20:43.920
<v Speaker 1>I think it's UM. It's really just, you know, basically

0:20:43.960 --> 0:20:45.560
<v Speaker 1>people saying I want to own it all. I want

0:20:45.560 --> 0:20:47.119
<v Speaker 1>to own everything, and I want to own it in

0:20:47.320 --> 0:20:50.840
<v Speaker 1>whatever incremental side it's coming to marketing. UM. I will say, though,

0:20:50.960 --> 0:20:53.320
<v Speaker 1>just if you're looking at UMM, thank you the land

0:20:53.359 --> 0:20:56.000
<v Speaker 1>of ETF right, Well, I mean you don't get the

0:20:56.000 --> 0:20:57.719
<v Speaker 1>pick and shoes, right, I mean, you go into an

0:20:57.720 --> 0:20:59.439
<v Speaker 1>e t F like this, you don't get to say, oh,

0:20:59.480 --> 0:21:04.080
<v Speaker 1>I want rething, but debt from Uraguay. I just think

0:21:04.200 --> 0:21:07.119
<v Speaker 1>the risk that you're you're mentioning is structural, right. I

0:21:07.119 --> 0:21:10.400
<v Speaker 1>mean the fact that the underlying emerging market bonds, even

0:21:10.440 --> 0:21:13.639
<v Speaker 1>the hardcorency US dollar bonds, the fact that an e

0:21:13.760 --> 0:21:16.199
<v Speaker 1>t F is allowing you to provide daily liquidity in

0:21:16.240 --> 0:21:19.480
<v Speaker 1>and out of those positions when those bonds don't really

0:21:19.520 --> 0:21:23.040
<v Speaker 1>trade like that. That could be an area of concern

0:21:23.160 --> 0:21:26.159
<v Speaker 1>going forward, just that structural liquidity mismatch, so to speak.

0:21:26.200 --> 0:21:28.399
<v Speaker 1>And and so that is an area that I'm looking at.

0:21:28.440 --> 0:21:29.960
<v Speaker 1>It's an area that my peers, I know, I've looked

0:21:30.000 --> 0:21:32.480
<v Speaker 1>at very closely. But you know, we're not quite uh,

0:21:32.600 --> 0:21:34.280
<v Speaker 1>we're not quite sure what to makeup at this point.

0:21:34.320 --> 0:21:37.840
<v Speaker 1>And of course Chinese, the Chinese Congress meets next week,

0:21:38.000 --> 0:21:41.640
<v Speaker 1>and I could also throw some potential opotatoes. And it's

0:21:41.640 --> 0:21:46.359
<v Speaker 1>interesting how liquidity can dry up so quickly, uh, particularly

0:21:46.400 --> 0:21:51.680
<v Speaker 1>in the debt that is maybe not universally traded. I

0:21:51.800 --> 0:21:54.360
<v Speaker 1>have to watch this, and that's why we got Damian Sassar.

0:21:54.480 --> 0:22:09.240
<v Speaker 1>He is are fixed income strategist for Bloomberg Intelligence. Late

0:22:09.480 --> 0:22:13.359
<v Speaker 1>last night, the European Central Bank officials were said to

0:22:13.359 --> 0:22:16.720
<v Speaker 1>be considering cutting their monthly bond buying, but at least

0:22:16.920 --> 0:22:21.000
<v Speaker 1>half starting in January. This was reported by Bloomberg News,

0:22:21.240 --> 0:22:24.320
<v Speaker 1>and the reaction to this is sort of surprising because

0:22:24.359 --> 0:22:27.560
<v Speaker 1>you think, Okay, the e c B is tapering, it's stimulus.

0:22:27.800 --> 0:22:31.280
<v Speaker 1>People would sell their bonds, their German government bonds? What

0:22:31.320 --> 0:22:34.399
<v Speaker 1>do they do? They bought here to explain why and

0:22:34.480 --> 0:22:37.800
<v Speaker 1>what this means about the great Central Bank unwind, going

0:22:37.880 --> 0:22:40.840
<v Speaker 1>forward to Scott Kimball, portfolio manager of the b MO

0:22:41.080 --> 0:22:44.200
<v Speaker 1>at tc H Core Plus Bond Fund, which trades under

0:22:44.240 --> 0:22:47.240
<v Speaker 1>the ticker m c B i X, and he joins

0:22:47.320 --> 0:22:51.480
<v Speaker 1>us here in our eleven three oh studio, Scott, I

0:22:51.520 --> 0:22:54.880
<v Speaker 1>don't know. If this can't get people to sell their

0:22:54.960 --> 0:22:59.280
<v Speaker 1>government bonds, what will Well? That's first of all, thank

0:22:59.280 --> 0:23:01.280
<v Speaker 1>you for having me, and uh, just to chime in

0:23:01.320 --> 0:23:02.919
<v Speaker 1>on what you were talking about there with the e

0:23:03.000 --> 0:23:05.400
<v Speaker 1>c B. UH, you know Chairman grip Draggy coming out

0:23:05.440 --> 0:23:09.359
<v Speaker 1>and talking about reducing the quantitative easing program. Uh, it

0:23:09.720 --> 0:23:11.760
<v Speaker 1>comes with really two different lenses you have to look

0:23:11.800 --> 0:23:14.120
<v Speaker 1>through it. One is the view of what that means

0:23:14.160 --> 0:23:17.840
<v Speaker 1>inherently for the bond market, which is, UH, if people

0:23:17.880 --> 0:23:22.080
<v Speaker 1>are holding onto German bunds, Spanish debt, Italian debt at

0:23:22.200 --> 0:23:24.040
<v Speaker 1>and expecting that the ECB is going to come in

0:23:24.040 --> 0:23:27.480
<v Speaker 1>and purchase those securities from them over the near term.

0:23:27.640 --> 0:23:30.080
<v Speaker 1>Then they could be potentially disappointed in the fact that

0:23:30.119 --> 0:23:32.000
<v Speaker 1>they've come out and said, well, we're going to continue buying,

0:23:32.000 --> 0:23:34.600
<v Speaker 1>but not quite as much. What should, in theory put

0:23:34.600 --> 0:23:37.359
<v Speaker 1>pressure on the spreads between those two move higher in

0:23:37.440 --> 0:23:41.439
<v Speaker 1>rates to move higher accordingly, UH, what happened is that

0:23:41.480 --> 0:23:44.359
<v Speaker 1>we saw investors come in and actually begin purchasing bonds

0:23:44.400 --> 0:23:47.639
<v Speaker 1>again today very strongly at a faster pace, which we

0:23:47.720 --> 0:23:51.640
<v Speaker 1>interpret as meaning that while the ECB is reducing the

0:23:51.960 --> 0:23:55.320
<v Speaker 1>overall size of the program, UH, the investors are still

0:23:55.359 --> 0:23:57.760
<v Speaker 1>betting that it's going to continue further on into the future,

0:23:58.160 --> 0:23:59.840
<v Speaker 1>and that the e c B is rather just sort

0:23:59.880 --> 0:24:01.919
<v Speaker 1>of keeping pace with what the FED and other central

0:24:01.920 --> 0:24:04.920
<v Speaker 1>banks are doing, and that they're not taking away the

0:24:05.000 --> 0:24:07.600
<v Speaker 1>punch bowl entirely. There's still a lot of reasons why

0:24:07.640 --> 0:24:10.760
<v Speaker 1>liquidity needs to remain very high in these economies, but

0:24:11.000 --> 0:24:12.679
<v Speaker 1>they're just taking some of the sugar out of it.

0:24:12.920 --> 0:24:16.159
<v Speaker 1>We've seen a very strong recovery throughout certainly the US

0:24:16.520 --> 0:24:19.600
<v Speaker 1>from our cycle Japan, we've seen the equity market over

0:24:19.600 --> 0:24:21.960
<v Speaker 1>there come to life, and we're seeing that European data

0:24:22.000 --> 0:24:24.800
<v Speaker 1>has been strong. So, uh, this is probably a fairly

0:24:24.840 --> 0:24:27.560
<v Speaker 1>appropriate step from the ECB. But we don't anticipate that

0:24:27.600 --> 0:24:30.720
<v Speaker 1>they're going to be exiting this bond buying program in

0:24:30.760 --> 0:24:32.640
<v Speaker 1>the intermediate term, which is why we think you saw

0:24:32.640 --> 0:24:35.679
<v Speaker 1>investors come in and sort of reassert their position. Hey, Scott,

0:24:35.680 --> 0:24:39.360
<v Speaker 1>I'm just wondering maybe there's a third, a third possibility,

0:24:39.440 --> 0:24:41.600
<v Speaker 1>and this could then we get into some talk about

0:24:41.600 --> 0:24:44.800
<v Speaker 1>what's in the York portfolio. But um, all right, let's

0:24:44.800 --> 0:24:47.359
<v Speaker 1>say that rates do rise. If they ever do rise

0:24:47.359 --> 0:24:50.080
<v Speaker 1>in Europe, that's going to make the new bonds more expensive.

0:24:50.400 --> 0:24:52.680
<v Speaker 1>And if you are an investor rather than a speculator,

0:24:53.320 --> 0:24:56.159
<v Speaker 1>I mean, has anyone ever really gotten fired because you

0:24:56.200 --> 0:24:59.720
<v Speaker 1>know they missed twenty five basis points or fifty basis

0:24:59.720 --> 0:25:02.320
<v Speaker 1>points over a thirty year or twenty year period. I mean,

0:25:02.600 --> 0:25:04.040
<v Speaker 1>you know, what are you gonna do? You're gonna go

0:25:04.080 --> 0:25:06.919
<v Speaker 1>out and sell your whole insurance portfolio of government bonds

0:25:07.000 --> 0:25:10.040
<v Speaker 1>because you know, oh, I could get twenty five basis

0:25:10.080 --> 0:25:12.760
<v Speaker 1>points more. I think you bring up an important point,

0:25:12.800 --> 0:25:14.280
<v Speaker 1>and that's really something that's kind of been in the

0:25:14.280 --> 0:25:16.320
<v Speaker 1>heart of our positioning in the in the Core Plus Fund,

0:25:16.320 --> 0:25:18.479
<v Speaker 1>which is that when you look at what's going on

0:25:18.520 --> 0:25:20.960
<v Speaker 1>in the world and what these banks have engineered, it's

0:25:21.000 --> 0:25:23.840
<v Speaker 1>a world where there is a wash with cash. Insurance

0:25:23.880 --> 0:25:26.080
<v Speaker 1>companies in particular, you know, it's a very important name

0:25:26.080 --> 0:25:28.359
<v Speaker 1>that you brought up, is the insurance industry. They have

0:25:28.440 --> 0:25:31.880
<v Speaker 1>gigantic pools of cash and very long dated liabilities. There's

0:25:31.880 --> 0:25:34.800
<v Speaker 1>a bigger risk to them misstepping on liability management side

0:25:34.800 --> 0:25:37.280
<v Speaker 1>than missing twenty five or fifty basis points on interest rates.

0:25:37.320 --> 0:25:39.520
<v Speaker 1>So we would be complete agreement with that. Okay, So

0:25:39.560 --> 0:25:41.119
<v Speaker 1>then I want to want you to follow up on

0:25:41.280 --> 0:25:44.800
<v Speaker 1>what's in the portfolio and how you construct your portfolio

0:25:44.960 --> 0:25:46.919
<v Speaker 1>of the Core Plus Bond Fund, because one of the

0:25:46.920 --> 0:25:48.920
<v Speaker 1>things that I've note when I look at it, you've

0:25:48.920 --> 0:25:52.520
<v Speaker 1>got a lot of floating rate debt, absolutely, and that

0:25:52.600 --> 0:25:54.960
<v Speaker 1>floating rate debt is a strectural opportunity for us to

0:25:55.000 --> 0:25:57.359
<v Speaker 1>position Core Plus Fund and really any of our strategies

0:25:57.359 --> 0:26:00.000
<v Speaker 1>to take advantage of different segments of the bond market.

0:26:00.119 --> 0:26:02.639
<v Speaker 1>What we do is look for bottom up value across

0:26:02.680 --> 0:26:05.239
<v Speaker 1>the entire spectrum of fixed income and say where are

0:26:05.280 --> 0:26:08.760
<v Speaker 1>their structural and efficiencies. One inefficiency that we noticed that

0:26:08.840 --> 0:26:11.679
<v Speaker 1>went back really about twelve d eighteen months was that

0:26:11.840 --> 0:26:14.680
<v Speaker 1>libor and the FED funds rate, we're sort of behaving

0:26:15.040 --> 0:26:18.160
<v Speaker 1>uh counterintuitively to what you'd anticipate from a rising FED.

0:26:18.720 --> 0:26:21.000
<v Speaker 1>So that meant that floating rate notes were very cheap.

0:26:21.240 --> 0:26:23.919
<v Speaker 1>You could buy uh interest rate. These are interest rate

0:26:23.960 --> 0:26:26.119
<v Speaker 1>bond instruments just like any other corporate bond, and when

0:26:26.200 --> 0:26:29.080
<v Speaker 1>rates rise, their coupon rises, so there are sensitivity to

0:26:29.160 --> 0:26:31.879
<v Speaker 1>rates is not particularly strong, which we thought was very

0:26:31.920 --> 0:26:34.280
<v Speaker 1>important for protecting the dollars we had invested on the

0:26:34.280 --> 0:26:37.960
<v Speaker 1>front end. And we're talking about companies like Abbott Labs, eBay,

0:26:38.160 --> 0:26:42.280
<v Speaker 1>Daimler Finance, IBM, Craft, Hiens, Activision, Blizzard. I mean, those

0:26:42.280 --> 0:26:44.000
<v Speaker 1>are the kind of corporate names we're talking about with

0:26:44.080 --> 0:26:46.800
<v Speaker 1>some of this floating rate there absolutely so when we

0:26:46.880 --> 0:26:49.119
<v Speaker 1>use when we look at the core plus fund and

0:26:49.119 --> 0:26:50.679
<v Speaker 1>decide where we want to take risk and how we

0:26:50.680 --> 0:26:53.439
<v Speaker 1>want to budget risk, that is a pocket the floating

0:26:53.520 --> 0:26:55.480
<v Speaker 1>rate notes, the front end, the shorter day and securities

0:26:55.480 --> 0:26:58.040
<v Speaker 1>where we're looking for a lot of liquidity and we're

0:26:58.040 --> 0:27:00.199
<v Speaker 1>not looking for credit headaches, So we use a lot

0:27:00.240 --> 0:27:02.840
<v Speaker 1>of high quality companies whose equity prices have given their

0:27:02.840 --> 0:27:07.560
<v Speaker 1>balance shee's a tremendous cushion. Is there anything that you're avoiding? Certainly.

0:27:07.640 --> 0:27:09.280
<v Speaker 1>So when we look at where we are in the

0:27:09.280 --> 0:27:13.679
<v Speaker 1>credit cycle, we keep hearing that referenced by constituents, investors, UH,

0:27:13.880 --> 0:27:16.960
<v Speaker 1>fund managers, UH. The word credit cycle, the term credit

0:27:16.960 --> 0:27:19.639
<v Speaker 1>cycle keeps getting used. Our opinion is that we're in

0:27:19.680 --> 0:27:22.200
<v Speaker 1>the seventh inning stretch, UH and take me out to

0:27:22.240 --> 0:27:24.720
<v Speaker 1>the ball game keeps playing on repeat, and that's exactly

0:27:24.720 --> 0:27:27.520
<v Speaker 1>what central banks have engineered. So what we're looking at

0:27:27.600 --> 0:27:30.119
<v Speaker 1>is trying to balance the idea that risk probably still

0:27:30.320 --> 0:27:32.680
<v Speaker 1>does well for the next twelve months, but at the

0:27:32.720 --> 0:27:35.439
<v Speaker 1>same time keeping the powder dry to take advantage of

0:27:35.440 --> 0:27:37.679
<v Speaker 1>some opportunities that might be created. And that's say, for example,

0:27:37.760 --> 0:27:40.920
<v Speaker 1>high yield bonds. Our allocation to high yield bonds as

0:27:40.960 --> 0:27:43.920
<v Speaker 1>that's as that sector has outperformed, has been trimmed back

0:27:44.320 --> 0:27:46.199
<v Speaker 1>with the anticipation that is, we're not getting paid as

0:27:46.280 --> 0:27:48.480
<v Speaker 1>much to own it. Maybe we can raise some liquidity

0:27:48.480 --> 0:27:50.360
<v Speaker 1>and an event there's a market disruption, we could jump

0:27:50.400 --> 0:27:52.800
<v Speaker 1>in and buy some yields. What are you buying for yield? Then?

0:27:52.840 --> 0:27:56.160
<v Speaker 1>Are you buying emerging markets. We're not buying emerging market debt.

0:27:56.400 --> 0:27:58.520
<v Speaker 1>We've been focused primarily and moving a little further out

0:27:58.560 --> 0:28:01.159
<v Speaker 1>the yield curve and investment grade where we're willing to

0:28:01.160 --> 0:28:03.080
<v Speaker 1>take a little more duration. At this point, we think

0:28:03.080 --> 0:28:05.439
<v Speaker 1>that interest rates have been pretty subdued, and then we

0:28:05.480 --> 0:28:08.840
<v Speaker 1>look at the corporate bond market, we see dislocations occur

0:28:08.960 --> 0:28:10.760
<v Speaker 1>that don't make a lot of sense. So one example

0:28:10.760 --> 0:28:12.640
<v Speaker 1>I would give you is, you know, Amazon buys Whole

0:28:12.680 --> 0:28:15.800
<v Speaker 1>Foods and the debt of Kroger Corporation sells off. We

0:28:15.880 --> 0:28:18.159
<v Speaker 1>think that might be unjustified. We jump in and we

0:28:18.240 --> 0:28:20.040
<v Speaker 1>lock in the yields at higher rates than they were

0:28:20.040 --> 0:28:22.320
<v Speaker 1>over the day before. So it sounds like you're expecting

0:28:22.359 --> 0:28:25.719
<v Speaker 1>a flatter yield curve. I think that it's consistent with

0:28:25.880 --> 0:28:27.880
<v Speaker 1>the FED rhetoric and the FED action that the yield

0:28:27.880 --> 0:28:30.199
<v Speaker 1>curve continues to flatten some. But we do think that

0:28:30.240 --> 0:28:33.240
<v Speaker 1>the FED is very conscious of what the potential percursor

0:28:33.320 --> 0:28:35.119
<v Speaker 1>could be if the yel curve were to invert. So

0:28:35.160 --> 0:28:37.760
<v Speaker 1>we think that a flatter yel curve, but a very

0:28:37.760 --> 0:28:41.040
<v Speaker 1>incremental FED As it flattens, and you're to date, the

0:28:41.080 --> 0:28:43.280
<v Speaker 1>fund is up a little bit more than four percent,

0:28:43.480 --> 0:28:45.360
<v Speaker 1>and you're getting one of like a two point nine

0:28:45.440 --> 0:28:49.600
<v Speaker 1>to three the yield on the on the payoff. One

0:28:49.600 --> 0:28:51.560
<v Speaker 1>of the things I want to ask about has to

0:28:51.600 --> 0:28:54.240
<v Speaker 1>do with the way in which you construct your portfolio,

0:28:54.640 --> 0:28:58.000
<v Speaker 1>because I noticed, you know you're buying in very specific lots.

0:28:58.000 --> 0:29:00.360
<v Speaker 1>You know you're buying twenty thousand here, fifteen house and

0:29:00.440 --> 0:29:03.160
<v Speaker 1>there is how do you organize? I mean, you're gonna

0:29:03.200 --> 0:29:06.560
<v Speaker 1>buy the same amount of Fannie May paper as you

0:29:06.600 --> 0:29:09.280
<v Speaker 1>would eBay floating rate paper. How do you or is

0:29:09.320 --> 0:29:12.960
<v Speaker 1>it just inventory what's available? It really reflects what what

0:29:13.120 --> 0:29:16.040
<v Speaker 1>where we want the overall risk and return profile of

0:29:16.080 --> 0:29:18.320
<v Speaker 1>the fund to be. One thing you'll notice about the

0:29:18.320 --> 0:29:21.040
<v Speaker 1>Core Plus Fund relative to perhaps others, is that we

0:29:21.080 --> 0:29:25.080
<v Speaker 1>don't carry thousands of securities. We have two fifty individual

0:29:25.120 --> 0:29:27.760
<v Speaker 1>line items. So we really have a thorough understanding of

0:29:27.800 --> 0:29:31.080
<v Speaker 1>this bond adds value. There's a value proposition. We own

0:29:31.120 --> 0:29:33.800
<v Speaker 1>the security, and we own it an amount that reconciles

0:29:34.120 --> 0:29:37.160
<v Speaker 1>the way we expect the portfolio to perform in various scenarios.

0:29:37.520 --> 0:29:39.480
<v Speaker 1>Your ability to do that gets heavily deluded if you

0:29:39.520 --> 0:29:42.520
<v Speaker 1>have too many individual line items and just quickly give

0:29:42.560 --> 0:29:44.480
<v Speaker 1>you ten seconds. Cash, you got about four and a

0:29:44.520 --> 0:29:46.640
<v Speaker 1>half percent of cash going to just keep it there.

0:29:47.160 --> 0:29:49.320
<v Speaker 1>Cash is really residual of what we do, and that

0:29:49.360 --> 0:29:51.440
<v Speaker 1>reflects the fact that we do think, um, you know,

0:29:51.560 --> 0:29:54.720
<v Speaker 1>there's a lot of opportunities we have of our fund invested,

0:29:55.120 --> 0:29:56.640
<v Speaker 1>but we have a little bit there for those really

0:29:56.680 --> 0:29:58.960
<v Speaker 1>unique opportunities to come along, all right, just as you

0:29:58.960 --> 0:30:01.760
<v Speaker 1>said those floating right now about twelve to eighteen months ago.

0:30:01.840 --> 0:30:04.360
<v Speaker 1>Thanks very much for being here. Scott Kimball, always a pleasure.

0:30:04.560 --> 0:30:09.440
<v Speaker 1>Portfolio manager of the BEM t c H Core plus

0:30:09.760 --> 0:30:13.480
<v Speaker 1>bond fund symbol m c BIX m c b i X.

0:30:16.600 --> 0:30:19.160
<v Speaker 1>Thanks for listening to the Bloomberg P and L podcast.

0:30:19.480 --> 0:30:23.400
<v Speaker 1>You can subscribe and listen to interviews at Apple Podcasts, SoundCloud,

0:30:23.520 --> 0:30:26.960
<v Speaker 1>or whatever podcast platform you prefer. I'm pim Fox. I'm

0:30:27.000 --> 0:30:31.000
<v Speaker 1>on Twitter at pim Fox. I'm on Twitter at Lisa Abramo.

0:30:31.120 --> 0:30:33.719
<v Speaker 1>It's one before the podcast. You can always catch us

0:30:33.760 --> 0:30:35.360
<v Speaker 1>worldwide on Bloomberg Radio.