Speaker 1: Good morning, peeps, and welcome to WIKA F Daily with
Speaker 1: Meet your Girl Danielle Moody, recording live from the Brooklyn Bunker.
Speaker 1: You know, folks, Happy Monday to you, and I really
Speaker 1: hope that each and every one of you had an enjoyable,
Speaker 1: rechargeable weekend, because you know, I think that I want
Speaker 1: to start off by saying that it is so important
Speaker 1: to rest. I cannot express enough how fast time feels
Speaker 1: like it has been moving these days. Like I woke
Speaker 1: up today and I blinked it, I said, what is
Speaker 1: the date? Like, how is it that November is literally
Speaker 1: around the corner? And I feel like time is moving
Speaker 1: at a breakneck pace because so many things are inundating
Speaker 1: us with time, toxicity and poison. And you know, on
Speaker 1: one hand, it's like, great, can we hurry up and
Speaker 1: get through all of this? On the other hand, I'm
Speaker 1: feeling like I want to be more intentional about the
Speaker 1: moments that I am living. What does that mean? It
Speaker 1: means to really be present in your moments of joy,
Speaker 1: really be present in your moments of peace, and acknowledge
Speaker 1: them for what they are, give gratitude for them. Because
Speaker 1: I feel like our nervous systems are just in such
Speaker 1: a tightened and heightened anxiety mode that if we are
Speaker 1: not being really conscious about how we are spending our
Speaker 1: peace time, and which I and I let me not suggest.
Speaker 1: This is not to suggest that your peace time should
Speaker 1: be bottled up within two days or really a day
Speaker 1: and a half, which is what the real weekends are. Right.
Speaker 1: You work on Friday, you have Friday night into Saturday
Speaker 1: and then Sunday, But then Sunday night is preparing for Monday.
Speaker 1: And so I'm not saying to bottle up all of
Speaker 1: your good time, peace and joy in those in that
Speaker 1: short time frame. No, it should be throughout your day, right.
Speaker 1: I think that we also live in a society where
Speaker 1: we're supposed to work, you know, fifty weeks out of
Speaker 1: the year and only get two weeks off. And that's America, right.
Speaker 1: Other places have six week vacations, have four to six
Speaker 1: week vacations that are spread either throughout the year or
Speaker 1: all at one time. And I'm thinking to myself, we
Speaker 1: never give ourselves a break, and then when we do
Speaker 1: have our break moments, we're riddled with guilt about taking
Speaker 1: a break because shouldn't we be doing something? And I
Speaker 1: realize nowadays that it is just so import to do
Speaker 1: nothing right, to just like let our nervous system relax,
Speaker 1: shut down social media, don't see what the next thing
Speaker 1: on Netflix is, go for a walk, you know, reconnect
Speaker 1: with friends, do some face times, or just like sit
Speaker 1: and be. But you know I do that. And I
Speaker 1: say that because in preparation for the week ahead, I
Speaker 1: have found that when I am very intentional about my
Speaker 1: alignment each day, when I'm very intentional about making time
Speaker 1: to rest, I am much better focused. I am a
Speaker 1: lot more creative. And that's the energy that I like
Speaker 1: to begin each week with. And so I offer that
Speaker 1: to all of you, to you know, if it's if
Speaker 1: it's necessary to be super intentional, meaning put it into
Speaker 1: your calendars each and every day. What are these moments
Speaker 1: that I am taking that I am owning. Do so
Speaker 1: if it's just the feeling of you know what, I
Speaker 1: need to take a pause, I need to take some breaths,
Speaker 1: do so because all of it is to help neutralize
Speaker 1: our nervous system so that we can just be at ease.
Speaker 1: And we live in a society that is not interested
Speaker 1: in anyone being at ease. And I say that because
Speaker 1: you know, taking in this political climate every single day
Speaker 1: and just kind of looking around at people who have
Speaker 1: the power to have such an impact. Right. I have
Speaker 1: always said that I've chosen a career and careers because
Speaker 1: I have moved around. I believe that life is a
Speaker 1: jungle gym, not a linear ladder, and that you should
Speaker 1: be able to jump from thing to thing whatever sparks
Speaker 1: your interests, your passion. And I understand that not everybody
Speaker 1: has the privilege to do that I in fact do,
Speaker 1: and so I honor that reality. I say that because
Speaker 1: being a part or wanting to be a part of
Speaker 1: a system that can have impact on our day to
Speaker 1: day lives, that can empower people, and then choosing not
Speaker 1: to is so absurd to me. It's I I look
Speaker 1: at these members of Congress, I look at these people
Speaker 1: and leadership, these CEOs, and I'm saying to myself, my
Speaker 1: life has always been about wanting to have impact, about
Speaker 1: wanting to create impact and sustain an impact for the good. Right,
Speaker 1: And what if we all were to just look at
Speaker 1: our life our work as that, how can I how
Speaker 1: can I be of support? How can I be of service? Right?
Speaker 1: What a different mindset to occupy then how can I
Speaker 1: be an obstacle? How can my life be about making
Speaker 1: sure that other people's are hard right and that are miserable.
Speaker 1: I just it's really hard for me to understand that
Speaker 1: that is a reality that half of this country really
Speaker 1: exists in, really does and it mirrors if you were
Speaker 1: to create a Ven diagram on all of these things
Speaker 1: that we're seeing, like people who don't believe in science,
Speaker 1: people who don't want to be vaccinated, people who are
Speaker 1: so deep into the into their tribes that they believe
Speaker 1: a criminal twice impeached man is their deity. If you
Speaker 1: look at the ven diagram of these things, it's like, Yes,
Speaker 1: these are the people that believe that they have they
Speaker 1: alone should have the power to tell other people how
Speaker 1: to lead their lives right or to take from them,
Speaker 1: And that to me is just an absurd way to exist.
Speaker 1: And it's such a waste of energy. You know. I
Speaker 1: believe that our bodies and are made of kinetic energy, right,
Speaker 1: and that when you come into contact with certain people.
Speaker 1: I say, nowadays, I am much more aware when energy shifts,
Speaker 1: whether it's for the good. I feel, you know, like
Speaker 1: I'm recharging. It's almost like standing in the sun, versus
Speaker 1: feeling very drained and waned and wondering why that feeling
Speaker 1: is happening. I, instead of just like wondering, I actually
Speaker 1: investigate and interrogate my emotions and my feelings because I
Speaker 1: don't want to spend time and energy around people or
Speaker 1: things that are not recharging. And when I look at
Speaker 1: how these people like the you know, Marjorie Taylor Greens
Speaker 1: and the Mitch McConnell's, and the Ted Cruises and the
Speaker 1: Jim Jordan's and the Matt Gateses and the Donald Trumps
Speaker 1: and the Steve Bannon's, when I look at these people,
Speaker 1: and each and every time that I said one of
Speaker 1: their names, my face scrunches up, my nose, you know,
Speaker 1: twitches as if something just smells rotten, because that's even
Speaker 1: the sentiment that is behind just utter ring these people's names.
Speaker 1: Right to make your existence so nasty? You know, nothing
Speaker 1: is about uplifting. It's always about me, me, me, And
Speaker 1: what can I do to increase my power? Right, my presence,
Speaker 1: assert myself one of the things that I'm hoping as
Speaker 1: because I believe that we are in an incredible transitional moment.
Speaker 1: I know that I am personally and many people that
Speaker 1: I talk to are feeling that sense as well, that
Speaker 1: you know, you can do what you feel like you
Speaker 1: can do, but then let the rest of it go.
Speaker 1: I used to be in a state where I could
Speaker 1: not let these things go. That I felt so deeply
Speaker 1: affected by all of the evil that I was seeing.
Speaker 1: And it's not to say that it's not happening, And
Speaker 1: I don't think that the alternative is to ignore it.
Speaker 1: I think that it's to acknowledge it, right, and then
Speaker 1: let it go and feel good about what you have done,
Speaker 1: to try and move the needle, to try and be
Speaker 1: of service, to be a ray of light to yourself
Speaker 1: and to other people, and then let the rest go,
Speaker 1: because it is going to fall where it's going to fall,
Speaker 1: you know, unlike how Donald Trump exists. We alone can't
Speaker 1: fix this, but we can continue to give ourselves the
Speaker 1: space to feel all of our feelings, to acknowledge what
Speaker 1: it is that we can do, and then let the
Speaker 1: rest go. And I think that that, to me is
Speaker 1: like what it means to really be abundant and align
Speaker 1: and to be woke, right, it is to be conscious
Speaker 1: of what you can impact right, do that what you can,
Speaker 1: and then let the rest go. I posted a quote
Speaker 1: over the weekend that was about that, that was about
Speaker 1: acknowledging that you've done everything that you could do this week.
Speaker 1: Be proud of what you've done right, what you were
Speaker 1: able to check off. You are not just your production,
Speaker 1: but you know, we all want to be doing good right,
Speaker 1: be doing well. And then it said, then let it
Speaker 1: go right, don't spend your weekend, don't spend the rest
Speaker 1: of your time ruminating over what could have been. Acknowledge
Speaker 1: what was, give gratitude for that, and then move on.
Speaker 1: And that's kind of the space that I think that
Speaker 1: we all need to be in because I'm going to
Speaker 1: be real, the signs are not pointing to things getting better,
Speaker 1: and so when things around you begin to fall apart
Speaker 1: or seemingly like they are falling apart, it is in
Speaker 1: humbit upon all of us to hold ourselves together right
Speaker 1: and really root and ground so that regardless of what
Speaker 1: the weather that comes in, that we'll still be standing tall.
Speaker 1: Because they want us to shrink, they want us to
Speaker 1: shrivel up, they want us to be broken. That's what
Speaker 1: their actions show us each and every day. I think
Speaker 1: there is a bigger shift that is at play here,
Speaker 1: and you know, maybe it isn't just about winning and losing.
Speaker 1: Maybe things do need to ebb and flow. Maybe we
Speaker 1: do need to see the realness, you know, the darkness
Speaker 1: of this country and like pull back, you know, the curtain,
Speaker 1: change out the rose colored lenses and see this place
Speaker 1: for what it is and what it has always been,
Speaker 1: and then do your part of what can be done
Speaker 1: to shift things. But understand that sometimes, you know, we
Speaker 1: need to go through darkness. And that's why it's important
Speaker 1: to create your own light, right, to create your own light,
Speaker 1: to be a light to others, and then let the
Speaker 1: rest go. Today I'm going to have a conversation with
Speaker 1: our friend Glenn Kirshner to understand where things are with
Speaker 1: you know, Steve Bannon, the insurrection, and whether or not
Speaker 1: we're ever going to see accountability. My feeling is, you know,
Speaker 1: as each and every day passes and we do these
Speaker 1: performative voting things, you know, to show that no one
Speaker 1: is above the law, and yet not one person inside
Speaker 1: of Trump's inner circle who's responsible for so much damage
Speaker 1: and criminality is indicted right now, and each and every
Speaker 1: day I lose hope that they ever will. And you
Speaker 1: know Glenn shed some light on how he feels about
Speaker 1: what will transpire with Steve Bannon and the timeline that
Speaker 1: we are functioning in and saying that we must not
Speaker 1: lose hope. So I want to hear from all of
Speaker 1: you in the comments section about what you thought about
Speaker 1: last week's vote and what you think, if anything, you
Speaker 1: will see from the Department of Justice this week with
Speaker 1: regard to actually making movements on trying to safeguard our democracy.
Speaker 1: That conversation is coming up next, folks. You know that
Speaker 1: when we have the opportunity to talk with our friend,
Speaker 1: the host of Justice Matters and MSNBC legal analyst, Glenn Kirshner,
Speaker 1: I am always thrilled because the legal news in America
Speaker 1: is much like Charlotte's Web. It is just tangled and
Speaker 1: all over the place. Glenn, let's start off with this
Speaker 1: this week and the fact that Steve Bannon in a
Speaker 1: vote of nine to zero with the one six commission,
Speaker 1: they voted to hold him in criminal content. We have
Speaker 1: talked about this and the different types of content that
Speaker 1: the Congress has the ability to hold individuals who ignore
Speaker 1: disregard their subpoenas. So talk to us about this vote
Speaker 1: and what we can expect next on the Steve benn
Speaker 1: In front. Because sadly, I wish that this justice system
Speaker 1: would treat guilty, wealthy, well connected white men the way
Speaker 1: that they do low income black and brown people and
Speaker 1: send sheriffs and battering rams to their homes and dragging
Speaker 1: them out. But that's not going to be the case here,
Speaker 1: is it, you know, not with Steve Bannon. I believe
Speaker 1: they'll continue to treat him with kid gloves, even though
Speaker 1: he is a repeat offender. Right he was pardoned by
Speaker 1: Donald Trump for stealing money from Trump's base courtesy of
Speaker 1: a bogus We Build the Wall foundation, and Trump pardoned him.
Speaker 1: But no, I suspect they'll still be treating him very, very,
Speaker 1: you know, civilly and cordially, and we'll be setting you know,
Speaker 1: long time frames for the upcoming litigation. But the good
Speaker 1: news is our government at least had a little spasm
Speaker 1: of accountability right this week by voting to hold him
Speaker 1: in contempt and refer him to the Department of Justice
Speaker 1: for criminal prosecution. It's sad that I am surprised that
Speaker 1: nine Republicans crossed over and voted to hold him in
Speaker 1: contempt and refer him for prosecution. But I think more importantly,
Speaker 1: two hundred and two Republicans, and let me say this
Speaker 1: as precisely as I can, aided and abetted Steve Bannon's
Speaker 1: contempt of Congress by voting no, by saying, we Congress
Speaker 1: can give you a lawful subpoena, and then if you
Speaker 1: defy it, if you deny it, if you are contemptuous,
Speaker 1: we've got your criminal back. All good. So I'm gonna
Speaker 1: begin calling them the traders two hundred and two. I
Speaker 1: think that fits them, and they assisted Bannon. They undermine
Speaker 1: their own legitimacy and their own power by announcing to
Speaker 1: all future witnesses who get Congressional subpoenis, we will not
Speaker 1: hold you accountable if you refuse to comply. That's insane.
Speaker 1: Currying favor with Trump's base while giving away your own
Speaker 1: power as a coequal branch of government is insane. But
Speaker 1: that's what the Traders two hundred and two just did.
Speaker 1: Now let me ask you. Let me ask a quick question,
Speaker 1: because this just literally popped into my head. This Republican
Speaker 1: Party is hell bent on authoritarianism, meaning that they want
Speaker 1: one sole person, one soul party, to be in power
Speaker 1: right by undermining their own authority. Is this their way
Speaker 1: of setting up that precise scenario where when the next
Speaker 1: Republican king or deity comes into power, that they don't
Speaker 1: even have to work in coordination with the Congress because
Speaker 1: they are they are effectively undermining their own power, their
Speaker 1: own legitimacy, their own authority given to them by the Constitution,
Speaker 1: in favor of this expanded executive branch. This you know,
Speaker 1: I alone can fix it. Do you think that this
Speaker 1: is part this could be part of their larger setup
Speaker 1: for twenty twenty four. I can see that argument. But
Speaker 1: what I don't understand is, first of all, they're not
Speaker 1: voting out of you know, their principled belief in a
Speaker 1: consolidated power in the chief executive. That's nonsense. They're voting
Speaker 1: because it's it's a calculation about getting reelected. Period. But
Speaker 1: what they're doing, I agree with you that what they're
Speaker 1: doing will have the effect of moving us closer and
Speaker 1: closer toward a dictatorship or an autocracy. But guess what,
Speaker 1: dictators have no need for congressional oversight, So they're really
Speaker 1: voting against their own interests in every conceivable way. Look
Speaker 1: at how Donald Trump treats Mitch McConnell. Now, maybe the
Speaker 1: one thing I agree with Donald Trump on Miss McConnell
Speaker 1: as a piec of you know what, who has to
Speaker 1: go but an autocrat, a dictator has no need for,
Speaker 1: and in fact will fight against and punish a coequal
Speaker 1: branch of government that has oversight of the dictator or
Speaker 1: the autocrat. So, you know, these members of Congress just
Speaker 1: don't think things through. They just in their determination to
Speaker 1: hold power because power equals money to them, they will
Speaker 1: vote for today even if it's going to hurt them tomorrow.
Speaker 1: I mean, that is one hundred percent right, And it's
Speaker 1: it is the short sidedness that is sending our democracy
Speaker 1: over a proverbial clip like it is this. We're about
Speaker 1: the immediacy. And I think the same way, you know,
Speaker 1: and I won't go off on a tangent, but I
Speaker 1: think the same way about mansion in cinema. It is
Speaker 1: about the immediacy of money in my pocket and the
Speaker 1: power that I feel like I'm holding onto now but
Speaker 1: not thinking about what this is going to do four years,
Speaker 1: six years, eight years, ten twelve down the road. And
Speaker 1: if you the purpose of us having these elected representatives
Speaker 1: is so that they are looking at the big picture, right,
Speaker 1: because all of us don't have the luxury of that
Speaker 1: kind of time. Right. Everybody else is working forty hours
Speaker 1: a week or plus more. That is still not providing
Speaker 1: food on the table. But but go ahead, go on
Speaker 1: with what are we going to see? Now? What happens
Speaker 1: next in the process. Once Congress has voted to refer
Speaker 1: a witness for criminal contempt, it goes over to the
Speaker 1: DCUs Attorney's office, and the federal law says the DCUs
Speaker 1: attorney shall not, may not might, but shall present the
Speaker 1: matter to the grand jury for its action. That action
Speaker 1: should be an indictment, and then it will move into
Speaker 1: the courts. I think it's helpful to look back, to
Speaker 1: look back in time to see when did this last happen?
Speaker 1: It last happened nearly forty years ago. And when I
Speaker 1: say it last happened, I mean Congress. A witness in
Speaker 1: the Reagan administration, an EPA administrator named Rita Lavelle, was
Speaker 1: subpoenaed by Congress. She thumbed her nose the subpoena, refused
Speaker 1: to appear, refused to comply. They voted her in contempt,
Speaker 1: and they voted to refer her for criminal prosecution. You
Speaker 1: know what the vote was, Danielle. The vote back then,
Speaker 1: the vote on the full floor of Congress was four
Speaker 1: hundred and thirteen to zero unanimous. Why because all Republicans
Speaker 1: and all Democrats recognized they had to protect their own
Speaker 1: power to subpoena and compel the testimony of witnesses. It
Speaker 1: wasn't a political calculation back then. It wasn't a reelection
Speaker 1: calculation back then. So look at how far we've fallen,
Speaker 1: because now we have the traitor as two hundred and
Speaker 1: two Republicans who voted against enforcing their own subpoena. So anyway,
Speaker 1: Rita Lavelle got voted into contempt, got referred for prosecution.
Speaker 1: One week later, one week later, my former office, the
Speaker 1: DCUs Attorney's Office, indicted Rita Lavelle and sent her over
Speaker 1: to the court for prosecution. That's the timetable, that is
Speaker 1: the measuring stick against which the Steve Bannon case should
Speaker 1: be judged. Now do we think Merrick Garland, the Department
Speaker 1: of Justice, my friends at the DCUs Attorney's Office are
Speaker 1: going to do this within a week. Let's wait and see,
Speaker 1: because if they don't, because there's a precedent for it.
Speaker 1: It's not a legal precedent, but it's an atmospheric precedent,
Speaker 1: it's a timing precedent, it's an historical precedent, because if
Speaker 1: they don't, that's going to begin to reinforce what I
Speaker 1: saw from Lawrence Tribe tweeted out that, you know, Merrick
Speaker 1: Garland is falling down on the job in any number
Speaker 1: of ways. I'm not prepared to say we've got to
Speaker 1: turn We've got to replace him, but I get more concerned,
Speaker 1: not less concerned, over time with his suitability to be
Speaker 1: the Attorney General at this precarious moment in our nation's history.
Speaker 1: You know, it just it feels in so many ways, Glenn,
Speaker 1: that so many people are falling down on the job.
Speaker 1: I'm going to be honest, because, you know, if it
Speaker 1: was just that we were dealing with this insurrectionist party,
Speaker 1: but all Democrats were on the same page and we
Speaker 1: were going full steam ahead, and this administration was going
Speaker 1: full steam ahead in order to secure pure our democracy,
Speaker 1: in order to close these loopholes and strengthen these guardrails
Speaker 1: that the past administration clearly broke wide open, then I
Speaker 1: wouldn't feel so frustrated as time goes on, I wouldn't
Speaker 1: be I wouldn't continue to be worried because I would
Speaker 1: know that, no, they sense the urgency of now. You know,
Speaker 1: what are you feeling about this administration's sense of urgency
Speaker 1: with the timetable that we are up against. You know,
Speaker 1: it seems like they have a sense of legislative urgency.
Speaker 1: They're trying as best they can to get infrastructure handled
Speaker 1: and voting rights handled. It's an open question about whether
Speaker 1: we'll see any success on those fronts, but we're hearing
Speaker 1: about that every day from Joe Biden and others. Right
Speaker 1: they seem to feel a sense of legislative urgency, But
Speaker 1: you know, I think that loses sight of the big
Speaker 1: picture because I think the greater need right now, what
Speaker 1: is more urgent is the survival of our democracy. And
Speaker 1: without holding Donald Trump accountable for his many election crimes
Speaker 1: and the insurrection, what I can all but guarantee is
Speaker 1: that you're never going to hear another Republican candidate after
Speaker 1: losing an election make a concession speech because they'll just
Speaker 1: announce that they won. They will have state legislatures that
Speaker 1: they've put in place to basically override the popular vote.
Speaker 1: In their jurisdiction and hand them the election. So I
Speaker 1: think what may become extinct is the Republican concession speech
Speaker 1: if we don't tackle this problem. Now. Did you see
Speaker 1: Condeliza Rice on the View where she said that America
Speaker 1: wants to turn the page on the insurrection, we have
Speaker 1: more important things to do. Yeah, I mean, I don't
Speaker 1: expect much from Condeliza Rice. I'm going to be honest
Speaker 1: with you, but that statement that we have better things,
Speaker 1: that we have more important things to do than the
Speaker 1: securing of it. And I said to myself, if America
Speaker 1: was watching what is unfolding here in any other country right,
Speaker 1: noticing seeing the red flags that this government that we're
Speaker 1: watching is unstable, right, what do you think that they
Speaker 1: would be recommending to do to turn the page on
Speaker 1: an attempted coup? I honestly I could not. I was
Speaker 1: I gasped audibly. I saw the reporting on that, and
Speaker 1: like you, what I heard her saying is we need
Speaker 1: to turn the page on free, fair elections. We need
Speaker 1: to turn the page on a healthy democracy. We need
Speaker 1: to turn the page on coequal branches of government. You know,
Speaker 1: that would be like me as a prosecutor telling the
Speaker 1: family of a homicide victim. Listen, we're not going to
Speaker 1: bring charges. We're not going to go to trial. We're
Speaker 1: not going to hold your son or your daughter, or
Speaker 1: your spouse or your partners kill or accountable. We just
Speaker 1: need to turn the page, y'all just need to heal.
Speaker 1: Or a rape victim. We're not going to go after
Speaker 1: the person who attacked you. We just have to turn
Speaker 1: the page. You just gotta heal, you gotta get over it.
Speaker 1: That's the kind of insanity represented by anyone, no disrespect
Speaker 1: to miss Rice, anyone who suggests you turn the page
Speaker 1: on crime. You turn the page on the attempt to
Speaker 1: overthrow our democracy without full accountability. That's insanity. And just
Speaker 1: hearing that. And this is from a different Republican time.
Speaker 1: That's why I'm signaling this out because Conna Liza Rice
Speaker 1: is a leader from a different time, right before the insurrection,
Speaker 1: before Trump is m So to see just how far
Speaker 1: everyone right, you know, and trust me, I have my
Speaker 1: own grievances. We all have our own grievances with Condoleeza Rice.
Speaker 1: But just to see that even those that were associated
Speaker 1: with the Bushes right and like that Republicanism is gone right,
Speaker 1: and they are fully on board with Sure, whatever you
Speaker 1: guys saw on one six, it just wasn't a big deal.
Speaker 1: So turn the page and let's not hold anybody accountable
Speaker 1: because we have bigger things to worry about. And in
Speaker 1: part that must be motivated by their understanding that if
Speaker 1: we hold accountable Donald Trump and all his criminal associates,
Speaker 1: there might not be another Republican elected to office for
Speaker 1: fifty years. So maybe at its core, that's what inspires
Speaker 1: people like Condoleeza Rice to say, Look, I am weighing
Speaker 1: the pros and cons in my own mind, and because
Speaker 1: I believe I'm giving miss Rice a lot of benefit
Speaker 1: of the doubt here. I believe in what were what
Speaker 1: used to be viewed as traditional Republican principles of government.
Speaker 1: I want to get back to that, and I fear
Speaker 1: that we will never get back to that if the
Speaker 1: criminal politicians in the Republican Party are held accountable for
Speaker 1: what they just did. So maybe she's like pulling back
Speaker 1: not to thirty thousand feet, but like she's sitting or
Speaker 1: butt on mars, looking down and saying, well, if I
Speaker 1: pull back this far, maybe I can see somehow this
Speaker 1: is for the greater good of the nation. I couldn't
Speaker 1: disagree more. That is it for me today. Folks on
Speaker 1: woke a f daily as always, Power to the people
Speaker 1: and to all the people. Power, Get woke and stay focus.
Speaker 1: Fuck